UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 20142016
Commission File No.: 0-255811-36691
The Priceline Group Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware (State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | 06-1528493 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
800 Connecticut Avenue Norwalk, Connecticut (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | 06854 (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 299-8000
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
| Title of Each Class: | | Name of Each Exchange on which Registered: |
| Common Stock, par value $0.008 per share | | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
| 2.150% Senior Notes Due 2022 | | New York Stock Exchange |
| 2.375% Senior Notes Due 2024 | | New York Stock Exchange |
| 1.800% Senior Notes Due 2027 | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
|
| | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer o |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of The Priceline Group Inc. as of June 30, 20142016 was approximately $62.8$61.6 billion based upon the closing price reported for such date on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by executive officers and directors of The Priceline Group Inc. on June 30, 20142016 have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of The Priceline Group Inc. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
The number of outstanding shares of The Priceline Group Inc.’s common stock was 51,939,19149,170,417 as of February 11, 2015.21, 2017.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, to the extent not set forth in this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference from The Priceline Group Inc.'s definitive proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 4, 2015,8, 2017, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of The Priceline Group Inc.'s fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2016.
The Priceline Group Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 20142016 Index
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our views regarding current expectations and projections about future events and conditions and are based on currently available information. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including the Risk Factors identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report; therefore, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed, implied or forecast in any such forward-looking statements.
Expressions of future goals and expectations and similar expressions, including "may," "will," "should," "could," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "intends," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "targets," and "continue," reflecting something other than historical fact are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements for various reasons including the risks we face, which are more fully described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors." Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. However, readers should carefully review the reports and documents we file or furnish from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC" or the "Commission"), particularly our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
PART I
Item 1. Business
We are a leading provider of online travel and travel related reservation and search services. Through our online travel agent ("OTA") services, we connect consumers wishingOur mission is to make travel reservations with providers of travel services aroundhelp people experience the world. We offerseek to achieve our mission by providing consumers, accommodation reservations (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties) through our Booking.com, priceline.com and agoda.com brands. Our priceline.com brand also offers consumers reservations for rental cars, airline tickets, vacation packages and cruises. We offer rental car reservations worldwide through rentalcars.com. We also allow consumers to easily compare airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information from hundreds of travel websites at once through KAYAK. We recently acquired OpenTable, a leading provider of online restaurant reservations. We believe that the online restaurant reservation business is complementary to our online travel businesses, and that both OpenTable and our travel businesses will benefit from adding OpenTable to The Priceline Group. We refer to our company and all of our subsidiaries and brands, including Booking.com, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.com and, as of July 24, 2014, OpenTable, collectively as "The Priceline Group," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us."
We launched our business in the United States in 1998 under the priceline.com brand and have since expanded our operations to include Booking.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.com and OpenTable, which are independently managed and operated brands. Our principal goal is to serve consumers and our travel service providerproviders and restaurant partnersrestaurants with worldwide leadership in online reservation and related services. We operate six primary, independently managed brands:
Booking.com - the world’s leading brand for booking online accommodation reservations, based on room nights booked.
priceline.com - a leading hotel, rental car, airline ticket and vacation package reservation service in the United States.
KAYAK - a leading meta-search service allowing consumers to easily search and compare travel itineraries and prices, including airline ticket, accommodation and rental car reservation information.
agoda.com - a leading accommodation reservation service catering primarily to consumers in the Asia-Pacific region.
Rentalcars.com - a leading worldwide rental car reservation service.
OpenTable - a leading provider of restaurant reservation and information services to consumers and restaurant reservation management services to restaurants.
Our business is driven primarily by international results, which consist of the results of Booking.com, agoda.com and rentalcars.comRentalcars.com and the results of the internationally based websitesinternational businesses of KAYAK and as of July 24, 2014, OpenTable (in each case regardless of where the consumer resides, where the consumer is physically located while making a reservationusing our services or the location of the travel service provider or restaurant). During the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, our international business (the substantial majority of which is generated by Booking.com) represented approximately 87% of our gross bookings (an operating and statistical metric referring to the total dollar value, generally inclusive of all taxes and fees, of all travel services purchased by our customers), and approximately 94%88% of our consolidated operating income.gross profit. A significant majority of our gross profit is earned in connection with facilitating accommodation reservations. See Note 1816 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more geographic information.
The Priceline Group Inc. was formed as a Delaware limited liability company in 1997 and was converted into a Delaware corporation in July 1998. On April 1, 2014, the Company changed its name from priceline.com Incorporated to The Priceline Group Inc. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "PCLN." Our principal executive offices are located at 800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut 06854. We refer to our company and all of our subsidiaries and brands collectively as "The Priceline Group," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us."
The Priceline Group Business Model
We derive substantially all of our revenues and gross profit from the following sources:
Commissions earned from facilitating reservations of accommodations, rental cars, cruises and other travel services;services on an agency basis;
Transaction gross profit on a merchant basis and customer processing fees from our accommodation, rental car, airline ticket and vacation package reservation services;
Advertising revenues primarily earned by KAYAK from sending referrals to OTAsonline travel companies ("OTCs") and travel service providers, as well as from advertising placements on KAYAK's websites and mobile apps;
Beginning on July 24, 2014, revenues recognized by OpenTable, which consist of reservation revenues (a feepaid by restaurants for each restaurant guestdiners seated through OpenTable's online reservation service),service, subscription fees for restaurant reservation management services provided by OpenTable and other OpenTable revenues; and
| |
• | GlobalDamage excess waiver fees, travel insurance fees and global distribution system ("GDS") reservation booking fees related to our Name Your Own Price® hotel, rental car and airline ticket reservation services and our price-disclosed airline ticket and rental car reservation booking fees, in each case related to certain of our travel services. |
Our priceline.com brand offers merchant Name Your Own Price® opaque travel services, which are recorded in revenue on a "gross" basis and have associated cost of revenue. All of our other services are recorded in revenue on a "net" basis and have no associated cost of revenue. Therefore, revenue increases and decreases are impacted by changes in the mix of our revenues between Name Your Own Price® travel services and other services. Gross profit reflects the commission or net margin earned for all of our retail, Name Your Own Price® and semi-opaque travel services and our advertising and other services. Consequently, gross profit is an important measure to evaluate growth in our business because, in contrast to our revenues, it is not affected by the different methods of recording revenue and cost of revenue between our Name Your Own Price® travel reservation services and our other services.
For the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, we had gross profit of approximately $7.6$10.3 billion comprised of "agency" gross profit, "merchant" gross profit, and "other""advertising and other" gross profit. Agency gross profit is derived from travel relatedtravel-related transactions where we aredo not the merchant of record and where the prices offacilitate payments for the travel services reserved through our websites are determined by third parties.provided. Agency gross profit, which represented the substantial majority of our total gross profit in 2014,2016, consists primarily of: (1) travel commissions earned from reservations at Booking.com, priceline.com and rentalcars.com;reservation commissions; (2) certain GDS reservation booking fees related to certain of the agency services listed above; and (3) processingtravel insurance fees. Merchant gross profit is derived from transactionsservices where we are the merchant of record and therefore charge the consumer's credit cardfacilitate payments for the travel services provided, and consists of: (1) transaction gross profit representing the amount charged to a consumer, less the amount charged to us by travel service providers, and travel reservation commissions in connection with (a) the accommodation reservations provided through our merchant accommodation reservation service at agoda.com and priceline.com and (b) the reservations provided through our merchant rental car service at rentalcars.comretail and Express Deals® service at priceline.com;travel reservation services; (2) transaction gross profitrevenues representing revenue charged to a consumer less the costprice of revenue amount charged to us by travel service providers in connection with the reservations provided through our Name Your Own Price® and vacation package reservation services;reservations charged to a customer (with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues); (3) processing fees charged in connection with our priceline.com merchant reservation services; and (4) ancillary fees, including damage excess waiver and travel insurance fees and certain GDS reservation booking fees related to certain of the services listed above.and (4) customer processing fees. Advertising and other revenues are derived primarily from (1) revenues earned by KAYAK for (a) sending referrals to OTAsOTCs and travel service providers; (2)providers and (b) advertising placements on KAYAK's websites and mobile apps; (3) reservation(2) revenues earned by OpenTable (a fee for each restaurant guest(a) reservation fees paid by restaurants for diners seated through OpenTable's online reservation service);service and (4)(b) subscription fees earned by OpenTable for restaurant reservation management services. Revenues from KAYAK are net of intercompanyservices; (3) revenues earned from other Priceline Group brands.by priceline.com for advertising on its websites; and (4) revenues generated by Booking.com's BookingSuite branded accommodation marketing and business analytics services. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
The Priceline Group Strategy
We aim to achieve our mission to help people experience the world through global leadership in online travel and restaurant reservation and related services. We focus on relentless innovation and a commitment to serve both consumers and our travel service provider and restaurant partners with unmatched service and best-in-class digital technology. The online travel category has continuedand dining categories continue to experience significant worldwide growthgrow as consumer purchasing shifts from traditional off-lineoffline channels to interactive online channels, including mobile channels. We are the leader in the worldwide online accommodation reservation market based on room nights booked. Our strategy is to continue to participate broadly in this online travel growth by expanding our service offerings and markets. In particular, we aim to be the world leader in online travel and travelrestaurant reservation and related services by (a) providing consumers with the best experience, through relentless execution and constant innovation, (b) partnering with travel service providers and restaurants to our mutual benefit, (c) operating entrepreneurial, independent brands that share best practices, and (d) investing in profitable and sustainable growth.
Providing the best consumer experience. We believe that offering consumers an outstanding online experience is essential for our future success. To accomplish this, we focus on providing consumers withwith: (a) a variety of intuitive, easy-to-use online travel and restaurant reservation and search services,services; (b) a continually increasing number, location and variety of accommodations and restaurants available through our services,services: (c) informative and useful content, such as pictures, accommodation and restaurant details and reviews,reviews; and (d) excellent customer service. For example, Booking.com increasingly provides reservation services for accommodations other than hotels.hotels, such as vacation rentals. Booking.com included over 1,115,000 properties on its website as of December 31, 2016, which included over 568,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are available on the Booking.com website). Further, we endeavor to provide excellent customer service in a variety of ways, including through our call centers and websites, so that our customersconsumers can be confident that booking reservations through us will lead to a positive experience. We are
constantly innovating ourin order to provide a best-in-class user experience with intuitive, easy-to-use websites and mobile offeringsapps to ensure that we are meeting the needs of online consumers while aiming to exceed their expectations.
Partnering with travel service providers and restaurants. We aim to establish mutually beneficial relationships with travel service providers and restaurants around the world. We believe that travel service providers and restaurants can benefit from participating in our services by increasing their distribution channels, demand and inventory utilization in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Travel service providers and restaurants benefit from our well-known brands and online marketing efforts, expertise in offering an excellent consumer experience through our websites and mobile apps and ability to offer their inventory in markets and to consumers that the travel service provider or restaurant may be unable or unlikely to reach. For example, an independent hotel may not have the means or expertise to market itself to international travelers, including in other languages, to build and operate effective desktop and mobile websites and online reservation services, or to engage in sophisticated online marketing techniques. Further, we are increasingly providing services, other than reservations booked through our websites and mobile apps, designed to help our partners grow their business. For example, Booking.com's BookingSuite services are designed to offer accommodation providers with affordable marketing and business analytics tools to help them attract customers and more effectively manage their properties. Similarly, OpenTable is continuously working to improve its reservation management software services to help restaurants more effectively manage their reservations and more efficiently market their available tables to diners.
Maintaining multiple, independently managed brands. We employ a strategy of operating multiple, independently managed brands, which we believe allows us the opportunity to offer our reservation services in ways that appeal to different consumers while maintaining an entrepreneurial, competitive spirit among our brands. We intend to invest resources to support organic growth by all of our brands, whether through increased advertising, geographic expansion, technology innovation or increased access to accommodations, rental cars, restaurants or other services. For example, we spend significant and increasing amounts on performance and brand advertising to acquire customers and establish and strengthen our brands. We also believe that by operating independently managed brands, we encourage innovation and experimentation by our brands, which allows us to more quickly discern and adapt to changing consumer behaviors and market dynamics. Although our brands are independently operated, we intend to continue efforts to share best practices, access to servicestravel service provider offerings and customers across our brands. We believe that by promoting our brands worldwide, sharing accommodation reservation supplyavailability and customer flow,demand, and applying our industry experiences in Europeacross brands and the United States to other regions,markets, we can furthermore effectively expand our reservation services globally and maintain and grow our position as a leading provider of worldwide online travel and travelrestaurant reservation and related reservation services.
Investing in profitable and sustainable growth. Our strategy isWe seek to ensure that we offer online services that meet the needs and the expectations of both consumers, and travel service providers and restaurants and that we believe are or will be likely to result in long-term profitability and growth. We intend to accomplish this through continuous investment and innovation, in growing our businesses in new and current markets, expanding our services and ensuring that we provide an appealing, intuitive and easy-to-use consumer experience through our websites and mobile applications.apps. We also may pursue strategic transactions. For example, in 2013 we entered the meta-search business when we acquired KAYAK and in 2014 we entered the online restaurant reservation market when we acquired OpenTable. We regularly evaluate, and may pursue and consummate, other potential strategic acquisitions, partnerships, joint ventures or investments, whether to expand our businesses into complementary areas, expand our current businesses, acquire innovative technology or for other reasons. For example, we have a commercial relationship with, and have made significant financial investments in, Ctrip, a leading OTC operating primarily in China.
Service Offerings
Through our OTAonline travel reservation services, we connect consumers wishing to make travel reservations with providers of travel services around the world. We offer consumers a broad array of accommodation reservations (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties) through our Booking.com, priceline.com and agoda.com brands. Our priceline.com brand also offers consumers reservations for rental cars, airline tickets, vacation packages and cruises. We offer rental car reservations worldwide through rentalcars.com.Rentalcars.com. We also allow consumers to easily compare travel reservation information, such as airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information, from hundreds of travel websites at once through KAYAK. Through OpenTable, we offer restaurant reservation services to consumers andWe provide restaurants with reservation management services and consumers with the ability to restaurants.make restaurant reservations at participating restaurants through OpenTable.
Booking.com. Booking.com is the world's leading brand for booking online accommodation reservations, based on room nights booked, with operations worldwide and headquarters in the Netherlands. As of February 13, 2015,December 31, 2016, Booking.com offered accommodation reservation services for more than 600,000over 1,115,000 properties in over 200220 countries and territories on its various websites and in 42over 40 languages, which includes over 245,000568,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are
available on the Booking.com website). Vacation rentals generally consist of, among others, properties categorized as single-unit and multi-unit villas, apartments, "aparthotels" (which are apartments with a front desk and cleaning service) and chalets and are generally self-catered (i.e., include a kitchen), directly bookable properties. Accommodation providers participate in Booking.com, which operates primarily under an agency model, by filing rates and information about the property in Booking.com's proprietary extranet. In addition, Booking.com has begun to offeroffers website and other marketing services and business analytics to accommodation providers as part of its BookingSuite initiative.
Priceline.com. Priceline.com offers online travel reservation services primarily in the United States and is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut. Through priceline.com, we offer consumers hotel, rental car and airline ticket reservationsreservation services, as well as vacation packages and cruises. Priceline.com is a leader in the "opaque"discount travel reservation business, including through its pioneering Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® hotel, rental car and airline reservation services. We describe our Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® travel services as "opaque" becauseofferings where certain elements of the service, including the identity of the travel service provider, are not disclosed to the consumer prior to making a reservation. Reservations made through priceline.com's opaque services are subject to various restrictions, depending on the type of reservation, such as being nonrefundable, not being eligible for frequent flyer or award program points and, in the case of airline tickets, requiring flexibility with respect to travel times and stops. We believe that the combination of priceline.com's retail and opaque models allows it to provide a broad array of options to value-conscious consumers. Priceline.com operates under both a merchant and agency model.
KAYAK. KAYAK, headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, provides an online price comparison service (often referred to as "meta-search") that allows consumers to easily search and compare travel itineraries and prices, including airline ticket, accommodation reservation and rental car reservation information, from hundreds of travel websites at once. KAYAK derives revenues from sending referrals to OTCs and travel service providers and from advertising placements on its websites and mobile apps. KAYAK offers its services in approximately 40 countries, with the United States being its largest market.
Agoda.com. Agoda.com is a leading online accommodation reservation service catering primarily to consumers in the Asia-Pacific region, with headquarters in Singapore and operations in Bangkok, Thailand and throughout the region. Accommodation providers participate in agoda.com, which operates primarily under a merchant model, by filing rates and information about the property in agoda.com's proprietary extranet.
Rentalcars.com. Rentalcars.com is a leading worldwide online rental car reservation service and is headquartered in Manchester, England. Rentalcars.com, which operates primarily under a merchant model, offers a primarily merchant, online retail and opaque rental car reservation serviceservices allowing consumers to make rental car reservations in more than 28,000approximately 49,000 locations throughout the world, with customer support provided in 40 languages. CustomersConsumers using rentalcars.comRentalcars.com can book a full range of vehicles online through rentalcars.com'sRentalcars.com's website or mobile app, or they can reserve their cars by phone.
KAYAK. KAYAK, headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, provides an online price comparison service (often referred to as "meta-search") that allows consumers to easily search and compare travel itineraries and prices, including airline ticket, accommodation reservation and rental car reservation information, from hundreds of travel websites at once. KAYAK derives revenues from advertising placements on its websites and mobile apps and from sending referrals to travel service providers and OTAs. KAYAK currently does business primarily in the United States, though it intends to continue to invest in expanding its international offerings.
OpenTable. In July 2014, we acquired OpenTable, a leading brand for booking online restaurant reservations. Headquartered in San Francisco, California, OpenTable provides online restaurant reservation services to consumers and reservation management services to restaurants. OpenTable does business primarily in the United States, though it intends to continue to invest in expanding its international offerings.
Marketing and Brand Awareness
Booking.com, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.comRentalcars.com and OpenTable have established widely used and recognized e-commerce brands through aggressive marketing and promotionpromotional campaigns. As a result, bothBoth our online and offlineperformance advertising expense hasand brand advertising expense have increased significantly in recent years, a trend we expect to continue. During 2014,2016, our total onlineperformance advertising expense was approximately $2.4$3.5 billion, a substantial portionprimarily related to the use of which was spent internationally through Internetonline search engines (primarily Google), meta-search and travel research services and affiliate marketing.marketing to generate traffic to our websites. We also invested $231approximately $296 million in offline advertising.brand advertising during 2016. We intend to continue a strategy of aggressively promoting brand awareness primarily through both online means although we also intend to increase ourand offline advertising efforts, including by expanding offlinebrand campaigns into additional markets. For example, building on its first offline advertising campaign, which it launched inWe expense the United States in 2013, Booking.com has begun offline advertising campaigns in other markets, including Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany. We recognize a substantial majority of onlineour advertising activities as the expense asis incurred, atwhich is typically in the time a reservation isquarter in which reservations are booked, but recognize most of our gross profit when the consumer's travel or dining experience is completed. As a result, onlineperformance advertising expense may not be recognized in the same period as the associated gross profit.
Online advertising efficiency, expressed as online advertising as a percentage of gross profit, is impacted by a number of factors that are subject to variability and that are, in some cases, outside of our control, including average daily rates ("ADRs"), costs per click, cancellation rates, foreign exchange rates, our ability to convert paid traffic to booking customers and the extent to which consumers come directly to our websites or mobile apps for bookings. From 2011 to 2013 our online advertising grew faster than our gross profit due to (1) year-over-year declines in online advertising returns on investment ("ROIs") and (2) brand mix within The Priceline Group as our international brands grew faster than our U.S. brands and spent a higher percentage of gross profit on online advertising. In 2014, these trends continued, but were more than offset by the inclusion of KAYAK and OpenTable because they spend a lower percentage of gross profit on online advertising than our other
brands. Also, our consolidated results exclude intercompany advertising by our brands on KAYAK since our acquisition of KAYAK in May 2013.
Competition
We compete globally with both online and traditional travel and restaurant reservation and related services. The marketmarkets for the travel reservation services we offer isare intensely competitive, a trend we expect to continue, and current and new competitors can launch new services at a relatively low cost. Some of our current and potential competitors, such as Google, Apple, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon and Facebook, have access to significantly greater and more diversified resources than we do, and they may be able to leverage other aspects of their businesses (e.g., search or mobile device businesses) to enable them to compete more effectively with us. For example, Google has entered various aspects of the online travel market, through its acquisition in 2011 of ITA Software, Inc.,including by establishing a major
flight information software company, itsmeta-search product (“Google Flights”) and a hotel meta-search service knownbusiness ("Hotel Ads") that are growing rapidly, as "Hotel Finder" andwell as its license of hotel-booking software from Room 77."Book on Google" reservation functionality.
We currently, or may potentially may in the future, compete with a variety of companies, including:
online travel reservation services such as Expedia, Hotels.com, Hotwire, Orbitz, Travelocity, Elong, Wotif, CarRentals.comCheaptickets, ebookers, HotelClub, RatesToGo and Venere,CarRentals.com, which are owned by Expedia; Orbitz.com, Cheaptickets, ebookers, HotelClub and RatesToGo, which are owned by Orbitz Worldwide (which has agreed to be acquired by Expedia); laterooms and asiarooms, which are owned by Tui Travel; Hotel Reservation Service (HRS) and hotel.de, which are owned by Hotel Reservation Service; and AutoEurope, Car Trawler,CarTrawler, Ctrip (in which we hold a minority interest), eLong (in which Ctrip has acquired a significant minority ownership interest), Meituan, ezTravel, MakeMyTrip, OYO Rooms, Yatra, Cleartrip, Traveloka, Webjet, Rakuten, Jalan Hotel Urbano,(which is owned by Recruit), ViajaNet, Submarino Viagens, Despegar/Decolar (in which Expedia holds a minority ownership interest), Fliggy (operated by Alibaba), 17u.com, Bookit.com,HotelTonight, CheapOair, Mr. and Mrs. Smith and eDreams ODIGEO;
online accommodation search and/or reservation services, such as Airbnb and HomeAway and Airbnb,(which is owned by Expedia), currently focused on vacation rental properties and other non-hotel accommodations, including individually owned properties;
large online companies, including search, social networking and marketplace companies such as Google, Facebook, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon, Baidu and Groupon;
traditional travel agencies, travel management companies, wholesalers and tour operators, many of which combine physical locations, telephone services and online services, such as Carlson Wagonlit, American Express, BCD Travel, Concur, Thomas Cook, TUI, Hotelbeds and Tui Travel,Tourico (which have agreed to merge) and Kuoni as well as thousands of individual travel agencies around the world;
travel service providers such as accommodation providers, rental car companies and airlines, many of which have their own branded websites to which they drive business, including large hotel chains such as Marriott International, Hilton and Hyatt Hotels, as well as joint efforts by travel service providers such as Room Key, an online hotel reservation service owned by several major hotel companies;
online travel search services and price comparison services (generally referred to as "meta-search" services), such as TripAdvisor, trivago (in which Expedia has acquiredholds a majority ownership interest), Qunar (which is controlled by Ctrip), Skyscanner (in which Ctrip holds a majority ownership interest), Google Flights, Google Hotel Ads and HotelsCombined; and
online restaurant reservation services, such as TripAdvisor's LaFourchette, Yelp's SeatMe, Zomato, Bookatable (which is owned by Michelin), Quandoo (which is owned by Recruit) and Yelp's SeatMe.Resy (in which Airbnb holds a minority investment); and
companies offering new rental car business models or car- or ride-sharing services that affect demand for rental cars, some of which have developed innovative technologies to improve efficiency of point-to-point transportation and extensively utilize mobile platforms, such as Uber, Lyft, Gett, Zipcar (which is owned by Avis), BlaBlaCar, Didi Chuxing and Ola.
TripAdvisor, a leading travel research and review website, Google, the world's largest search engine, and other large, established companies with substantial resources and expertise in developing online commerce and facilitating Internet traffic have launched search, meta-search and/or reservation booking services and may create additional inroads into online travel, both in the United States and internationally. Meta-search services leverage their search technology to aggregate travel search results for the consumer's specific itinerary across travel service provider (e.g., accommodations, rental car companies or airlines), OTAOTC and other travel websites and, in many instances, compete directly with us for customers. Meta-search services intend to appeal to consumers by showing broader travel search results than may be available through OTAsOTCs or other travel websites, which could lead to travel service providers or others gaining a larger share of search traffic. TripAdvisor has begun supporting its meta-search service with offline advertising, and trivago, atwo leading meta-search service in Europe, has been aggressively advertising in the United States since 2013. Google offers "Hotel Finder", acompanies, support their meta-search service that Google has at times placed at or near the top of its hotel-related search results.services with significant brand and performance advertising. Through our KAYAK meta-search service, we compete directly with other meta-search services. KAYAK depends on access to information related to travel service pricing, schedules, availability and other related information from OTAs and travel service providers.
Consumers may favor travel services offered by meta-search websites or search companies over OTAs, which could reduce traffic to our travel reservation websites, increase consumer awareness of our competitors' brands and websites and
increase our advertising and other customer acquisition costs. To the extent any such consumer behavior leads to growth in our KAYAK meta-search business, such growth may not result in sufficient increases in profits from our KAYAK meta-search business to offset any related decrease in profits experienced by our OTA brands. Further, meta-search services may evolve into more traditional OTAsOTCs by offering consumers the ability to make travel reservations directly through their websites. For example, TripAdvisor facilitates hotel reservations on its transactional websites Tingo and Jetsetter and now allows consumers to make a reservation at some accommodations while staying on TripAdvisor through its "Instant Booking" offering. We currently do not participate in "Instant Booking"offering, which includes participation by many of the leading global hotel chains, and therefore risk losing sharefacilitates hotel reservations on its transaction websites Tingo and Jetsetter.
There has been a proliferation of reservations sourcednew channels through TripAdvisor. Other meta-searchwhich accommodation providers can offer reservations. For example, companies such as Airbnb and HomeAway (which is owned by Expedia) offer services providing vacation rental property owners, particularly individuals, an online place to list their accommodations where travelers can search and book such properties and compete directly with our vacation rental accommodation services. Airbnb may also offer direct booking services with travel service providers, which may leadseek to more consumers booking directly with a travel service provider rather than an OTA. To the extent consumers book travel services through a meta-search website or directly with a travel service provider after visiting a meta-search website or meta-search utility on a traditional search engine without using an OTA like us, or if meta-search services limit our participation within their search results, we may need to increase our advertising or other customer acquisition costs to maintain or grow our reservation bookings and our business, gross bookings and results of operations could be adversely affected.
As a result of our acquisition of OpenTable, we now compete or may in the futurefurther compete with us by offering hotel and other restaurant reservation providers, such as LaFourchette, a European restaurant reservation business owned by TripAdvisor,non-vacation rental accommodations through their online and Yelp's SeatMe service.mobile platforms.
Travel service providers, including multi-national hotel chains, rental car companies and airlines with which we conduct business, compete with us in online channels to drive consumers to their own websites in lieu of third-party distributors likesuch as us. Travel service providers that sell on their own websites may charge lower prices and, in some instances, offer advantages such as loyalty points or special discounts to members of closed user groups (such as loyalty program participants or customers with registered accounts), any of which could make their offerings more attractive to consumers than our services. Discounting may increase as competition authorities seek to allow increased pricing flexibilityFurther, consolidation among providers of travel service reservations. We may needproviders, such as Marriott International's acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts, could result in lower rates of commission paid to offer similar advantagesOTCs, increased discounting and greater incentives for consumers to maintain or grow our reservation bookings, which could adversely impact our profitability.join closed user groups as such travel service providers expand their offerings.
Widespread adoption of mobile devices, such asGoogle's Android operating system is the iPhone, Android-enabled smart phones and tablets such asleading smartphone operating system in the iPad, coupled with the improved web browsing functionality and development of thousands of useful "apps" available on these devices, is driving substantial online traffic and commerce to mobile platforms. We have experienced a significant shift of business to mobile platforms and our advertising partners are also seeing a rapid shift of traffic to mobile platforms. Our major competitors and certain new market entrants are offering mobile applications for travel products and other functionality, including proprietary last-minute discounts for accommodation reservations. Advertising and distribution opportunities may be more limited on mobile devices given their smaller screen sizes. The gross profit earned on a mobile transaction may be less than a typical desktop transaction due to different consumer purchasing patterns. For example, accommodation reservations made on a mobile device typically are for shorter lengths of stay and are not made as far in advance. Further, given the device sizes and technical limitations of tablets and smart phones, mobile consumers may not be willing to download multiple apps from multiple companies providing a similar service and instead prefer to use one or a limited number of apps for their mobile travel and restaurant research and reservation activity.world. As a result, Google could leverage its Android operating system to give its travel services a competitive advantage, either technically or with prominence on its Google Play app store or within its mobile search results. Further, Google is the consumer experience with mobile apps as well as brand recognitionleading Internet search service and loyalty are likelyhas leveraged its search popularity to become increasingly important. Our mobile offerings have received strong reviews and are driving a material and increasing share of our business. We believe that mobile bookings present an opportunity for growth and are necessary to maintain and grow our business as consumers increasingly turn to mobile devices instead of a personal computer. If we are unable to continue to rapidly innovate and create new, user-friendly and differentiated mobile offerings and efficiently and effectively advertise and distribute on these platforms, or if our mobile offerings are not used by consumers, we could lose market share to existing competitors or new entrants and our future growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.
promote its travel meta-search services. Similarly, Apple, Inc., one of the most innovative and successful companies in the world and producer of, among other things, the iPhone and iPad, obtained a patent for "iTravel," a mobile app that would allow a traveler to check in for a travel reservation. In addition, Apple's iPhone operating system includes "Passbook,""Wallet" (formerly known as "Passbook"), a virtual wallet app that holds tickets, boarding passes, coupons and gift cards, and, along with iTravel, may be indicative of Apple's intent to enter the travel reservations business in some capacity. Apple has substantial market share in the smart phonesmartphone category and controls integration of offerings, including travel services, into its mobile operating system. Apple also has more experience producing and developing mobile apps and has access to greater resources than we have. Apple may use or expand iTravel, Passbook,Wallet, Siri (Apple's voice recognition "concierge" service), Apple Pay (Apple's new mobile payment system) or another mobile app or functionality as a means of entering the travel reservations marketplace. Similarly, Google's Android operating system is the leading smart phone operating system in the world. As a result, Google could leverage its Android operating system to give its travel services a competitive advantage, either technically or with prominence on its Google Play app store or within its mobile
search results. To the extent Apple or Google use their mobile operating systems, or app distribution channels or, in the case of Google, search services, to favor their own travel service offerings, our business could be harmed.
There has been a proliferation of new channels through which accommodation providers can offer reservations. For example, companies such as HomeAway and Airbnb offer services focused on providing vacation rental property owners, particularly individuals, an online place to list their accommodations where travelers can search and book such properties. Companies such as HotelTonight, Tingo and Hipmunk have developed new and differentiated offerings that endeavor to provide savings on accommodation reservations to consumers and that compete directly with us. Further, meta-search services may lower the cost for new companies to enter the market by providing a distribution channel without the cost of promoting the new entrant's brand to drive consumers directly to its website. If any of these services are successful in attracting consumers who would otherwise use our services, our business and results of operations wouldcould be harmed.
Competition in U.S. online travel remains intense and online travel companies are creating new promotions and consumer value features in an effort to gain competitive advantages. In particular, the competition to provide "opaque" accommodation reservation services to consumers, an area in which our priceline.com business has been a leader, has become more intense. For example, Expedia makes opaque accommodation room reservations available on its principal website under the name "Expedia Unpublished Rates" and has, we believe, supported this initiative with steeper discounts through lower margins. We believe these offerings, in particular "Expedia Unpublished Rates," have adversely impacted the market share and year-over-year growth rate of priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® opaque hotel reservation service, which has been experiencing a decline in room night reservations since 2011. These and other competitors could also launch opaque rental car services, which could negatively impact priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® opaque rental car reservation services. As a result of this increased competition, our share of the discount accommodation reservation market in the United States could further decrease, which would harm our business and results of operations.
Operations and Technology
Our business is supported by multiple systems platforms, which were designed with an emphasis on scalability, performance and reliability. The platforms are largely independent among Booking.com, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.comRentalcars.com and OpenTable. The software platforms and architecture use a variety of tools within each corporate implementation, including server-side Java, C++, ASP, .Net, Perl, PHP, JavaScript and SQL scripts integrated with Oracle, MySQL, MongoDB, Cassandra and Microsoft SQL-server database systems. These internal platforms were designed to include open application protocol interfaces that can provide connectivity to vendors in the industries in which we operate. These include large global systems, such as accommodation, room, airline ticket and rental car reservation systems and financial service providers, as well as individual accommodation service providers, such as individual hotels. Our applications utilize digital certificates to help us conduct secure communications and transactions, as appropriate.
The systems infrastructure and web and database servers of our worldwide operations are primarily hosted in England,the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Hong Kong Switzerland and fivefour locations in the United States, each of which provides network connectivity, networking infrastructure, UPS conditioned power and 24-hour monitoring and engineering support typical of hosted data centers. All data center facilities have a continuous power supply system, generators, redundant servers and multiple back-up systems. IfAlthough we take steps to mitigate the effects of any loss or reduction in service at one of our hosting facilities, if a hosting facility were inaccessible or otherwise experienced a disruption in service for any reason, we would need to divert traffic to another hosting facility, which may lead tocould experience a disruption to our services, foregoneloss of transactions and revenue and consumer complaints.
CustomerWe provide customer service for our international business is provided primarily through a mix of in-house call centers. We outsource most of the call centercenters and customer service functions for our U.S. businesses.outsourced third party services.
Intellectual Property
Over time and through acquisitions, we have assembled a portfolio of patents, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, domain names, and trade secrets covering our services. We regard the protection of our intellectual property as critical to our success. We protect our intellectual property rights by relying on national, federal, state and common law rights in the United
States and internationally, as well as a variety of administrative procedures, regulations, conventions and treaties. We also rely on contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights in our services. We enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with employees and contractors and nondisclosure agreements with parties with whom we conduct business in order to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary information.
WeAs we deem appropriate, we pursue the registration of our intellectual property, such as domain names, trademarks and service marks, in the United States and internationally. We currently hold numerousvarious issued U.S. and international patents and pending U.S. and international patent applications. We file additional patent applications on new inventions, as we deem appropriate. Effective trademark,
copyright, patent, domain name, trade dress and trade secret protection is expensive to maintain and may require litigation. As we continue to expand internationally, protecting our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights involves an increasing number of jurisdictions, a process that is expensive and time consumingtime-consuming and may not be successful in every location. See "Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "We face risks related to our intellectual property."
Governmental Regulation
The services we provide are subject to various laws and regulations. For example, our travel services are subject to laws governing the offer and/or sale of travel services as well as laws requiring us to register as a "seller of travel" in certain jurisdictions. In addition, our services may be subject to various taxing regulations. See "Risk Factors - We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities," "Risk Factors - Our financial results will likely be materially impacted by payment of income taxes in the future" and "Risk Factors - Adverse application of state and local tax laws could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations."
We are subject to laws that require protection of user privacy and user data. In our processing of reservations, we receive and store a large volume of personally identifiable data in the United States, Europe and Asia. This data is increasingly subject to laws and regulations in numerous jurisdictions around the world, including the Commission of the European Union through its Data Protection Directive and variations and implementations of that directive in the member states of the European Union. Such government action is typically intended to protect the privacy of personal data that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. See "Risk Factors - Our processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data exposes us to risks of internal or external security breaches and could give rise to liabilities" and "Risk Factors - 'Cookie' laws could negatively impact the way we do business."
We are also subject to anti-trust and competition laws, and the competition authorities in various jurisdictions have begun investigations into competitive practices within the online travel industry, including with respect to our business. See "Risk Factors - As the size of our business grows, we may become increasingly subject to the scrutiny of anti-trust and competition regulators."
In addition, our strategy involves rapid geographic expansion around the world, including in Asia, South America and elsewhere, many of which regions and countries have different legislation, regulatory environments and tax laws. Compliance with legal, regulatory and tax requirements around the world places demands on our time and resources, and we may nonetheless experience unforeseen and potentially adverse legal, regulatory or tax consequences, which may have an adverse effect on our business. See "Risk Factors - Regulatory and legal requirements and uncertainties could harm our business."
Seasonality
A meaningful amount of our gross bookings are generated early in the year, as customers plan and reserve their spring and summer vacations in Europe and North America. FromHowever, we generally do not recognize revenue from these bookings until the travel occurs, which can be in a cost perspective,quarter other than when the reservation is booked. In contrast, we expense the substantial majority of our advertising activities as the expense is incurred, which, in the case of performance advertising in particular, is typically in the quarter in which associated reservations are booked. However,As a result of this potential timing difference between when we generally do notrecord advertising expense and when we recognize associated revenue, until future quarters when the travel occurs. As a result, we typically experiencehave historically experienced our highest levels of profitability in the second and third quarters of the year, which is when we experience the highest levels of accommodation checkouts for the year for our European and North American businesses. The first quarter of the year is typically our lowest level of profitability and European businesses.may experience volatility in earnings growth rates due to these seasonal timing factors. For our Asia-Pacific business, we experience the highest levels of accommodation bookings in the third and fourth quarters of the year, and the highest levels of travel consumption in the fourth quarter. As the relative growth rates for these businesses fluctuate, the quarterly distribution of our operating results may vary.
In addition, the date on which certain holidays fall can have an impact on our quarterly results. For example, in 20132016, our secondfirst quarter year-over-year growth rates in revenue, gross profit, operating income and operating margins were adversely affectedpositively impacted by Easter falling in the first quarter instead of the second quarter, as it did in 2012.2015. Conversely, our second quarter 20142016 year-over-year growth rates in revenue, gross profit, operating income and operating margins were favorablyadversely impacted by Easter falling in the first quarter instead of the second quarter, as it did in 2015. Similarly to 2015, in 2017 Easter will fall in the second quarter instead of the first quarter, and will therefore have a negative effect on our first quarter 2017 year-over-year growth rates and a positive effect on our second quarter 2017 year-over-year growth rates as it didcompared to the same periods in 2013.2016 when Easter fell in the first quarter. The timing of other holidays such as Chinese New Year, Carnival and Ramadan can also impact our quarterly year-over-year growth rates.
The impact of seasonality can be exaggerated in the short-termshort term by the gross bookings growth rate of the business. For example, in periods where our gross bookings growth rate substantially decelerates, our operating margins typically benefit from relatively less variable advertising expense. In addition, gross profit growth is typically less impacted by decelerating gross bookings growth in the near term due to the benefit of revenue related to reservations booked in previous quarters. Conversely, in periods where our gross bookings growth rate accelerates, our operating margins are typically negatively impacted by relatively more variable advertising expense. In addition, gross profit growth is typically less impacted by accelerating gross bookings growth in the near term as a portion of the revenue recognized from such gross bookings will occur in future quarters.
We experience the highest levels of booking and travel consumption for our Asia-Pacific and South American businesses in the first and fourth quarters. Therefore, if these businesses continue to grow faster than our North American and European businesses, our operating results for the first and fourth quarters of the year may become more significant over time as a percentage of full year operating results.
Employees
As of December 31, 2014,2016, we employed approximately 12,70018,500 employees, of which approximately 2,800 are3,600 were based in the United States and approximately 9,900 are14,900 were based outside the United States. We also retain independent contractors to support our customer service, website content translation and system support functions.
We have never had a work stoppage and our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit. Wewe consider our relations with our employees to be good. Although we have works councils or employee representatives in certain countries, our U.S. employees are not represented by a labor union and are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, integrate, retain and motivate highly qualified technical and managerial personnel, for whom competition is intense.
See "Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - -"We rely on the performance of highly skilled personnelpersonnel; and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel or hire, retain and motivate qualified personnel, our business would be harmed."
The Priceline Group Websites
We maintain websites with the addresses www.pricelinegroup.com, www.booking.com, www.priceline.com, www.kayak.com, www.agoda.com, www.rentalcars.com and www.opentable.com, among others. We are not including the information contained on our websites as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available free of charge through the www.pricelinegroup.com website our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. These reports and other information are also available, free of charge, at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the The Priceline Group Inc.Company's Code of Conduct is available through the www.pricelinegroup.com website and any amendments to or waivers fromof the Code of Conduct will be disclosed on that website.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business, results of operations or financial condition. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Declines or disruptions in the travel industry could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Our financial results and prospects are significantlyalmost entirely dependent upon the sale of travel services, particularly leisure travel.services. Travel, including accommodation (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties), rental car and airline ticket reservations, is significantly dependent on discretionary spending levels. As a result, sales of travel services tend to decline during general economic downturns and recessions when consumers engage in less discretionary spending, are concerned about unemployment or inflation, have reduced access to credit or experience other concerns or effects that reduce their ability or willingness to travel. For example, the recent worldwide recession that began in 2007 led to a weakening in the fundamental demand for our travel reservation services and an increase in the number of consumers who canceled existing travel reservations with us. Also during the recession, the accommodation industry experienced a significant decrease in occupancy rates and average daily rates ("ADRs"). While lower occupancy rates have historically resulted in accommodation providers increasing their distribution of accommodation reservations through third-party intermediaries such as us, our remuneration for accommodation reservation transactions changes proportionately with price, and therefore, lower ADRs generally have a negative effect on our accommodation reservation business and a negative effect on our gross profit. Further, during periods of higher occupancy rates, accommodation providers may decrease their distribution of accommodation reservations through third-party intermediaries like us,
Concerns persist about the outlook for the global economy in particular through our discount services such as priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals®.
Many governments aroundgeneral, including uncertainty in the world, including the U.S. government and certain European governments, are operating at large financial deficits, resulting in high levels of sovereign debt in such countries. Greece, Ireland, Portugal and certain other European Union countries with high levels of sovereign debt at times have had difficulty refinancing their debt. Failure to reach political consensus regarding workable solutions to these issues has resulted in a high level of uncertainty regarding the futureand China. Perceived or actual adverse economic outlook. This uncertainty,conditions, including slow, slowing or negative economic growth, unemployment rates and weakening currencies and concerns over government responses such as well as concern over governmental austerity measures including higher taxes and reduced government spending, could impair consumer spending and adversely affect travel demand. Greece's newly elected government, which campaigned against austerity measures, may not be able to reach an acceptable solution toFurther, uncertainty regarding the country's debt crisis with the European Union. This may increase the likelihood that Greece, and in turn other countries, could exitfuture of the European Union whichfollowing the United Kingdom's vote to leave ("Brexit") and concerns regarding certain E.U. members with sovereign debt default risks could lead to added economic uncertaintyalso negatively affect consumer spending and further devaluation or eventual abandonment of the Euro common currency.adversely affect travel demand. At times, we have experienced volatility in transaction growth rates, increased cancellation rates and weaker trends in hotel ADRs across many regions of the world, particularly in those European countries that appear to be most affected by economic uncertainties. Weuncertainties, which we believe that these business trends are likely impacted by weak economicdue at least in part to macro-economic conditions and sovereign debt concerns. Disruptions in the economies of such countries could cause, contribute to or be indicative of deteriorating macro-economic conditions.conditions, which in turn could negatively affect travel to or from such countries or the travel industry in general and therefore have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
These and other macro-economic uncertainties, such as sovereign default risk becoming more widespread, declining oil prices, geopolitical tensions and differing central bank monetary policies, have led to significant volatility in the exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro, the British Pound Sterling and other currencies. Significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates, stock markets and oil prices can also impact consumer travel behavior. For example, although lower oil prices may lead to increased travel activity as consumers have more discretionary funds and airline fares decrease, recent declines in oil prices and stock market volatility may be indicative of broader macro-economic weakness, which in turn could negatively affect the travel industry and our business.
Since the United Kingdom's Brexit vote, global markets and foreign exchange rates have experienced increased volatility, including a sharp decline in the value of the British Pound Sterling as compared to the U.S. Dollar. Upon leaving the European Union, among other things, the United Kingdom could lose access to the single European Union market and travel between the United Kingdom and European Union countries could be restricted. We could face new regulatory costs and challenges if U.K. regulations and policies diverge from those of the European Union. Since the timing and terms of the United Kingdom's exit from the European Union are unknown, we are unable to predict the effect Brexit will have on our business and results of operations. The United Kingdom's decision to leave the European Union could result in other member countries also determining to leave, which could lead to added economic and political uncertainty and further devaluation or eventual abandonment of the Euro common currency, any of which could have a negative impact on travel and therefore our business and results of operations. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2016, U.K. destination gross profit and U.K. source market gross bookings were 10% or less as a share of our business.
The uncertainty of macro-economic factors and their impact on consumer behavior, which may differ across regions, makes it more difficult to forecast industry and consumer trends and the timing and degree of their impact on our markets and business, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our business and adversely affect our results of
operations. For example, we have experienced an increase in cancellation rates, which we expect to continue and which we believe is due in part to these macro-economic factors and a resulting lack of consumer confidence. Increased cancellation rates negatively affect our advertising efficiency and our results of operations.
In addition, other unforeseen events beyond our control, such as worldwide recession, oil prices, terrorist attacks, unusual or extreme weather patterns,or natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, droughts and volcanic eruptions, travel relatedtravel-related health concerns including pandemics and epidemics such as Ebola, Zika, Influenza H1N1, avian bird flu, SARS and SARS,MERS, political instability, regional hostilities, imposition of taxes or surcharges by regulatory authorities, changes in trade or travel relatedimmigration policies or travel-related accidents, can disrupt travel or otherwise result in declines in travel demand. Because these events or concerns are largely unpredictable, they can dramatically and suddenly affect travel behavior by consumers, and therefore demand for our services, which can adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, our business and operations were negatively impacted by the terrorist attacks in late 2012Paris in November 2015, Brussels in March 2016, Orlando in June 2016, Nice in July 2016, and Istanbul in July 2016 and January 2017; the coup attempt in Turkey in July 2016; Hurricane Sandy, which disrupted travel in the northeastern United States. In early 2011, Japan was struck byStates in late 2012; a major earthquake, tsunami and nuclear emergency. In October 2011,emergency in Japan in 2011; severe flooding in Thailand a key market for our agoda.com businessin October 2011; and the Asian business of Booking.com, negatively impacted booking volumes and cancellation rates in that market. In addition, Thailand recently experienced disruptive civil unrest in Thailand in 2014. In addition, MERS had an adverse impact on our business in northeast Asia in 2015. Also, since 2015, regional hostilities in the Middle East have spurred an unprecedented flow of migrants from that region to Europe and other areas. As countries respond to the migrant crisis, travel between countries within the European Union and to and from the region could be subject to increased restrictions or the closing of borders, which could negatively impacted booking volumesimpact travel to, from or within the European Union and cancellation ratesadversely affect our business and results of operations. In the United States, the Trump administration has proposed or is considering various actions that could affect U.S. trade policy or practices, which in this market. In early 2010, Thailand also experienced civil unrest, which causedturn could adversely affect travel to or from the temporary relocation of agoda.com's Thailand-based operations.United States. Future terrorist attacks, natural disasters, health
concerns, or civil or political unrest or other events out of our control such as the ones described above could further disrupt our business and operations and adversely affect our results of operations.
Intense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance.
We compete globally with both online and traditional travel and restaurant reservation and related services. The markets for the services we offer are intensely competitive, and current and new competitors can launch new services at a relatively low cost. Some of our current and potential competitors, such as Google, Apple, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon and Facebook, have access to significantly greater and more diversified resources than we do, and they may be able to leverage other aspects of their businesses (e.g., search or mobile device businesses) to enable them to compete more effectively with us. For example, Google has entered various aspects of the online travel market, including by establishing a flight meta-search product ("Google Flights") and a hotel meta-search business ("Hotel Ads") that are growing rapidly, as well as its "Book on Google" reservation functionality.
We currently, or may potentially in the future, compete with a variety of companies, including:
online travel reservation services such as Expedia, Hotels.com, Hotwire, Orbitz, Travelocity, Wotif, Cheaptickets, ebookers, HotelClub, RatesToGo and CarRentals.com, which are owned by Expedia; Hotel Reservation Service (HRS) and hotel.de, which are owned by Hotel Reservation Service; and AutoEurope, Car Trawler, Ctrip (in which we hold a minority interest), eLong (in which Ctrip has acquired a significant minority ownership interest), Meituan, ezTravel, MakeMyTrip, OYO Rooms, Yatra, Cleartrip, Traveloka, Webjet, Rakuten, Jalan (which is owned by Recruit), ViajaNet, Submarino Viagens, Despegar/Decolar (in which Expedia holds a minority interest), Fliggy (operated by Alibaba), 17u.com, HotelTonight, CheapOair, Mr. and Mrs. Smith and eDreams ODIGEO;
online accommodation search and/or reservation services, such as Airbnb and HomeAway (which is owned by Expedia), currently focused on vacation rental properties and other non-hotel accommodations, including individually owned properties;
large online companies, including search, social networking and marketplace companies such as Google, Facebook, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon, Baidu and Groupon;
traditional travel agencies, travel management companies, wholesalers and tour operators, many of which combine physical locations, telephone services and online services, such as Carlson Wagonlit, American Express, BCD Travel, Concur, Thomas Cook, TUI, Hotelbeds and Tourico (which have agreed to merge) and Kuoni, as well as thousands of individual travel agencies around the world;
travel service providers such as accommodation providers, rental car companies and airlines, many of which have their own branded websites to which they drive business, including large hotel chains such as Marriott International, Hilton and Hyatt Hotels, as well as joint efforts by travel service providers such as Room Key, an online hotel reservation service owned by several major hotel companies;
online travel search and price comparison services (generally referred to as "meta-search" services), such as TripAdvisor, trivago (in which Expedia holds a majority ownership interest), Qunar (which is controlled by Ctrip), Skyscanner (in which Ctrip holds a majority interest), Google Flights, Google Hotel Ads and HotelsCombined;
online restaurant reservation services, such as TripAdvisor's LaFourchette, Yelp's SeatMe, Zomato, Bookatable (which is owned by Michelin), Quandoo (which is owned by Recruit) and Resy (in which Airbnb holds a minority interest); and
companies offering new rental car business models or car- or ride-sharing services that affect demand for rental cars, some of which have developed innovative technologies to improve efficiency of point-to-point transportation and extensively utilize mobile platforms, such as Uber, Lyft, Gett, Zipcar (which is owned by Avis), BlaBlaCar, Didi Chuxing and Ola.
TripAdvisor, a leading travel research and review website, Google, the world's largest search engine, and other large, established companies with substantial resources and expertise in developing online commerce and facilitating Internet traffic have launched search, meta-search and/or reservation booking services and may create additional inroads into online travel, both in the United States and internationally. Meta-search services leverage their search technology to aggregate travel search results for the consumer's specific itinerary across travel service provider (e.g., accommodations, rental car companies or airlines), online travel company ("OTC") and other travel websites and, in many instances, compete directly with us for customers. Meta-search services intend to appeal to consumers by showing broader travel search results than may be available through OTCs or other travel websites, which could lead to travel service providers or others gaining a larger share of search traffic. TripAdvisor and trivago, two leading meta-search companies, support their meta-search services with significant brand and performance advertising. Through our KAYAK meta-search service, we compete directly with other meta-search services. KAYAK depends on access to information related to travel service pricing, schedules, availability and other related information from OTCs and travel service providers. To the extent OTCs or travel service providers do not provide such information to KAYAK, KAYAK's business and results of operations could be harmed.
Consumers may favor travel services offered by meta-search websites or search companies over OTCs, which could reduce traffic to our travel reservation websites, increase consumer awareness of our competitors' brands and websites and increase our advertising and other customer acquisition costs. To the extent any such consumer behavior leads to growth in our KAYAK meta-search business, such growth may not result in sufficient increases in profits from our KAYAK meta-search business to offset any related decrease in profits experienced by our travel service reservation brands. Further, meta-search services may evolve into more traditional OTCs by offering consumers the ability to make travel reservations directly through their websites. For example, TripAdvisor allows consumers to make a reservation at some accommodations while staying on TripAdvisor through its "Instant Booking" offering, which includes participation by many of the leading global hotel chains, and facilitates hotel reservations on its transaction websites Tingo and Jetsetter. We have been participating in Instant Booking since 2015, however such participation may not result in substantial incremental bookings and could cannibalize business that would otherwise come to us through other ad offerings on TripAdvisor, directly (including after a consumer first visits TripAdvisor) or through other channels, some of which may be more profitable to us than reservations generated through "Instant Booking." To the extent consumers book travel services through a service such as Google's "Book on Google," a meta-search website or directly with a travel service provider after visiting a meta-search website or meta-search utility on a traditional search engine without using an OTC like us, or if meta-search services limit our participation within their search results or evolve into more traditional OTCs, we may need to increase our advertising or other customer acquisition costs to maintain or grow our reservation bookings and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
There has been a proliferation of new channels through which accommodation providers can offer reservations. For example, companies such as Airbnb and HomeAway (which is owned by Expedia) offer services providing vacation rental property owners, particularly individuals, an online place to list their accommodations where travelers can search and book such properties and compete directly with our vacation rental accommodation services. Airbnb may also seek to further compete with us by offering hotel and other accommodations through their online and mobile platforms. Further, meta-search services may lower the cost for new companies to enter the market by providing a distribution channel without the cost of promoting the new entrant's brand to drive consumers directly to its website. If any of these services are successful in attracting consumers who would otherwise use our services, our business and results of operations would be harmed.
Travel service providers, including hotel chains, rental car companies and airlines with which we conduct business, compete with us in online channels to drive consumers to their own websites in lieu of third-party distributors such as us. Travel service providers may charge lower prices and, in some instances, offer advantages such as loyalty points or special discounts to members of closed user groups (such as loyalty program participants or consumers with registered accounts), any of which could make their offerings more attractive to consumers than our services. For example, Marriott International, Hilton, Hyatt Hotels, Intercontinental Hotel Group and Choice Hotels International have announced additional initiatives to encourage consumers to book accommodations directly through their websites, with increased discounting and incentives. Discounting may increase as competition authorities seek to allow increased pricing flexibility among providers of travel service reservations. We may need to offer similar advantages to maintain or grow our reservation bookings, which could adversely impact our profitability. Further, consolidation among travel service providers, such as Marriott International's acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts, could result in lower rates of commission paid to OTCs, increased discounting and greater incentives for consumers to join closed user groups as such travel service providers expand their offerings. If we are not as effective as our competitors (including hotel chains) in offering discounted prices to closed user groups or if we are unable to entice members of our competitors' closed user groups to use our services, our ability to grow and compete could be harmed.
We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
We conduct a substantial majority of our business outside the United States but we report our results in U.S. Dollars. As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international businesses are translated from local currency (principally Euros and British Pounds Sterling) into U.S. Dollars. Throughout 2015, the U.S. Dollar strengthened significantly year-over-year relative to substantially all currencies in which we transact, most notably the Euro, Brazilian Real, British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and Australian Dollar. In 2016, the U.S. Dollar continued to be stronger year-over-year relative to the British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and many other major currencies in which we transact. Since the “Brexit” referendum in the United Kingdom in June 2016, the U.S. Dollar has strengthened significantly against the British Pound Sterling. Potential tax law changes, such as a U.S. border adjustment tax on imported goods, could, if implemented, lead to additional foreign exchange rate volatility and potentially additional strengthening of the U.S. dollar. As a result of these currency exchange rate changes, our foreign currency denominated net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses and net income have been negatively impacted as expressed in U.S. Dollars, although to a much lesser extent in 2016 than in 2015. For example, gross profit from our international operations grew 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, but, without the negative impact of changes in currency exchange rates, grew year-over-year on a constant-currency basis by approximately 25%. If the U.S. dollar strengthens further, our foreign currency denominated net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses and net income when expressed in U.S. dollars would be adversely affected.
Recent macro-economic conditions, such as sovereign default risk of certain European Union countries with high levels of sovereign debt, concern around devaluation or abandonment of the Euro common currency, declining oil prices, Brexit, geopolitical tensions and differing central bank monetary policies, have led to significant volatility in the exchange rate between the Euro, the British Pound Sterling, the U.S. Dollar and other currencies. Significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates can affect consumer travel behavior. For example, the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar relative to the Euro in 2015 made it more expensive for Europeans to travel to the United States, and dramatic depreciation of the Russian Ruble in 2014 and 2015 made it more expensive for Russians to travel to Europe and most other non-Ruble destinations. Consumers traveling from a country whose currency has weakened against other currencies may book lower ADR accommodations, choose to shorten or cancel their international travel plans or choose to travel domestically rather than internationally, any of which could adversely affect our gross bookings, revenues and results of operations, in particular when expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains and losses that are reflected in our financial results.
Volatility in foreign exchange rates and its impact on consumer behavior, which may differ across regions, make it more difficult to forecast industry and consumer trends and the timing and degree of their impact on our markets and business, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our business and adversely affect our results of operations.
We face risks related to the growth rate and the global expansion of our international business.
We derive a substantial portion of our revenues, and have significant operations, outside the United States. Our international operations include the Netherlands-based accommodation reservation service Booking.com, the Asia-based
accommodation reservation service agoda.com, the U.K.-based rental car reservation service rentalcars.comRentalcars.com and, to a lesser extent, KAYAK's international meta-search services and OpenTable's international restaurant reservation business. Our international OTC operations have achieved significant year-over-year growth in their gross bookings (an operating and statistical metric referring to the total dollar value, generally inclusive of all taxes and fees, of all travel services purchasedbooked by our customers)customers, net of cancellations). This growth rate, which has contributed significantly to our growth in consolidated revenue, gross profit and earnings, per share, has declined, a trend we expect to continue as the absolute level of our gross bookings grows larger.increases. Other factors may also slow the growth rates of our revenues derived from our international business,businesses, including, for example, worldwide or regional economic conditions, any strengthening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, the British Pound Sterling and other currencies, declines in ADRs, increases in cancellations, adverse changes in travel market conditions and the competitiveness of the market. A decline in the growth rates of our international businesses could have a negative impact on our future consolidated revenue, gross profit and earnings per share growth rates and, as a consequence, our stock price.
Our strategy involves continued rapid international expansion in regions throughout the world. Many of these regions have different economic conditions, customs, languages, currencies, consumer expectations, levels of consumer acceptance and use of the Internet for commerce, legislation, regulatory environments (including labor laws and customs), tax laws and levels of political stability.stability, and we are subject to associated risks typical of international businesses. International markets may have strong local competitors with an established brand and travel service provider or restaurant relationships that may make expansion in that market difficult and costly and take more time than anticipated. In addition, compliance with legal, regulatory or tax requirements in multiple jurisdictions places demands on our time and resources, and we may nonetheless experience unforeseen and potentially adverse legal, regulatory or tax consequences. In some markets such as China, legal and other regulatory requirements may prohibit or limit participation by foreign businesses, such as by making foreign ownership or management of Internet or travel-related businesses illegal or difficult, or may make direct participation in those markets uneconomic, which could make our entry into and expansion in those markets difficult or impossible, require that we work with a local partner or result in higher operating costs. If we are unsuccessful in rapidly expanding in new and existing markets and effectively managing that expansion, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Certain markets in which we operate that are in earlier stages of development have lower operating margins compared to more mature markets, which could have a negative impact on our overall margins as these markets increase in size over time. Also, we intend to continue to invest in adding accommodations available for reservation on our websites, including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels and vacation rentals. Vacation rentals generally consist of, among others, properties categorized as single-unit and multi-unit villas, apartments, "aparthotels" (which are apartments with a front desk and cleaning service) and chalets and are generally self-catered (i.e., include a kitchen), directly bookable properties. Many of the newer accommodations we add to our travel reservation services, especially in highly penetrated markets, may have fewer rooms lower ADRs or higher credit risk and may appeal to a smaller subset of consumers (e.g., hostels and bed and breakfasts), and therefore may also negatively impact our margins. For example, because. Because a vacation rental is typically either a single unit or a small collection of independent units, vacation rental properties represent more limited booking opportunities than non-vacation rental properties, which generally have more units to rent per property. Our non-hotelvacation rental accommodations in general may be subject to increased seasonality due to local tourism seasons, weather or other factors. Our vacation rental accommodation business may also experience lower profit margins due to certain additional costs related to offering these accommodations on our websites. As we increase our non-hotelvacation rental accommodation business, these different market characteristics could negatively impact our profit margins; and, to the extent these properties represent an increasing percentage of the properties added to our websites, we expect that our gross bookings growth rate and property growth rate will likelycontinue to diverge over time (since each such property has fewer booking opportunities). As a result of the foregoing, as the percentage of non-hotel accommodationsvacation rental properties increases, the number of reservations per property will likely continue to decrease.
In addition, non-hotel accommodations, includingas our vacation rental reservation business grows, we may incur increasing numbers of complaints related to non-existent properties or properties that are significantly different than as described in the listing, as well as claims of liability based on events occurring at such properties such as robbery, injury, death and other similar events. Such complaints or claims could result in negative publicity and increased costs, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Further, the regulatory environment related to vacation rentals tendis evolving and laws, regulations or property association rules could impose restrictions or burdens on vacation rental property owners that limit or negatively affect their ability to berent their properties. Some jurisdictions have adopted or are considering statutes or ordinances that prohibit owners and managers from renting certain properties for fewer than a stated number of consecutive days or for more seasonal in nature and may close during "off-season," which impactsthan an aggregate total number of days per year. Such regulations could negatively impact the growth of our property counts quarter to quarter.vacation rental reservation business.
We believe that the increase in the number of accommodation providers that participate on our websites, and the corresponding access to accommodation room nights, has been a key driver of the growth of our accommodation reservation business. The growth in our accommodation bookings typically makes us an attractive source of consumer demand for our accommodation providers. However, accommodation providers may wish to limit the amount of business that flows through a
single distribution channel. As a result, we may experience constraints on the number of accommodation room nights available to us, which could negatively impact our growth rate and results of operations.
The number of our employees worldwide has grown from less than 700 in the first quarter of 2007 to approximately 12,70018,500 as of December 31, 2014,2016, which growth is mostly comprised of hires by our international operations, including as a
result of our international acquisitions.operations. We may not be able to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage required personnel, which may limit our growth, damage our reputation, negatively affect our financial performance, and otherwise harm our business. In addition, expansion increases the complexity of our business and places additional strain on our management, operations, technical performance, financial resources and internal financial control and reporting functions. Our current and planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support and effectively manage this growth and our future operations, especially as we employ personnel in multiple geographic locations around the world. We are subject to risks typical of international businesses, including differing economic conditions, differing customs, languages and consumer expectations, changes in political climate, differing tax structures and other regulations and restrictions, including labor laws and customs, and foreign exchange rate volatility.
Intense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance.
We compete with both online and traditional travel reservation services. The market for the travel reservation services we offer is intensely competitive, and current and new competitors can launch new services at a relatively low cost. Some of our current and potential competitors, such as Google, Apple, Alibaba, Amazon and Facebook, have access to significantly greater and more diversified resources than we do, and they may be able to leverage other aspects of their businesses (e.g., search or mobile device businesses) to enable them to compete more effectively with us. For example, Google has entered various aspects of the online travel market through its acquisition in 2011 of ITA Software, Inc., a major flight information software company, its hotel meta-search service known as "Hotel Finder" (discussed below) and its license of hotel-booking software from Room 77.
We currently, or potentially may in the future, compete with a variety of companies, including:
online travel reservation services such as Expedia, Hotels.com, Hotwire, Travelocity, eLong, Wotif, CarRentals.com and Venere, which are owned by Expedia; Orbitz.com, Cheaptickets, ebookers, HotelClub and RatesToGo, which are owned by Orbitz Worldwide (which has agreed to be acquired by Expedia); laterooms and asiarooms, which are owned by Tui Travel; Hotel Reservation Service and hotel.de, which are owned by Hotel Reservation Service; and AutoEurope, Car Trawler, Ctrip, MakeMyTrip, Webjet, Rakuten, Jalan, Hotel Urbano, ViajaNet, Submarino Viagens, Despegar/Decolar, 17u.com, Bookit.com, CheapOair, Mr. and Mrs. Smith and eDreams ODIGEO;
online accommodation search and/or reservation services, such as HomeAway and Airbnb, focused on vacation rental properties, including individually owned properties;
large online companies, including search, social networking and marketplace companies such as Google, Facebook, Alibaba, Amazon and Groupon;
traditional travel agencies, wholesalers and tour operators, many of which combine physical locations, telephone services and online services, such as Carlson Wagonlit, American Express, Thomas Cook and Tui Travel, as well as thousands of individual travel agencies around the world;
travel service providers such as accommodation providers, rental car companies and airlines, many of which have their own branded websites to which they drive business, including joint efforts by travel service providers such as Room Key, an online hotel reservation service owned by several major hotel companies;
online travel search and price comparison services (generally referred to as "meta-search" services), such as TripAdvisor, trivago (in which Expedia has acquired a majority ownership interest), Qunar, Skyscanner and HotelsCombined; and
online restaurant reservation services, such as TripAdvisor's LaFourchette and Yelp's SeatMe.
TripAdvisor, a leading travel research and review website, Google, the world's largest search engine, and other large, established companies with substantial resources and expertise in developing online commerce and facilitating Internet traffic have launched meta-search services and may create additional inroads into online travel, both in the United States and internationally. Meta-search services leverage their search technology to aggregate travel search results for the consumer's specific itinerary across travel service provider (e.g., accommodations, rental car companies or airlines), online travel agent ("OTA") and other travel websites and, in many instances, compete directly with us for customers. Meta-search services intend to appeal to consumers by showing broader travel search results than may be available through OTAs or other travel websites, which could lead to travel service providers or others gaining a larger share of search traffic. TripAdvisor has begun supporting its meta-search service with offline advertising, and trivago, a leading meta-search service in Europe, has been aggressively
advertising in the United States since 2013. Google offers "Hotel Finder", a meta-search service that Google has at times placed at or near the top of hotel-related search results. Through our KAYAK meta-search service, we compete directly with other meta-search services. KAYAK depends on access to information related to travel service pricing, schedules, availability and other related information from OTAs and travel service providers. To the extent OTAs or travel service providers do not provide such information to KAYAK, KAYAK's business and results of operations could be harmed.
Consumers may favor travel services offered by meta-search websites or search companies over OTAs, which could reduce traffic to our travel reservation websites, increase consumer awareness of our competitors' brands and websites and increase our advertising and other customer acquisition costs. To the extent any such consumer behavior leads to growth in our KAYAK meta-search business, such growth may not result in sufficient increases in profits from our KAYAK meta-search business to offset any related decrease in profits experienced by our OTA brands. Further, meta-search services may evolve into more traditional OTAs by offering consumers the ability to make travel reservations directly through their websites. For example, TripAdvisor facilitates hotel reservations on its transaction websites Tingo and Jetsetter and intends to allow consumers to make a reservation while staying on TripAdvisor through its "Instant Booking" offering. We currently do not participate in "Instant Booking" and therefore risk losing share of reservations sourced through TripAdvisor. Other meta-search providers may also offer direct booking services with travel service providers, which may lead to more consumers booking directly with a travel service provider rather than an OTA. To the extent consumers book travel services through a meta-search website or directly with a travel service provider after visiting a meta-search website or meta-search utility on a traditional search engine without using an OTA like us, or if meta-search services limit our participation within their search results, we may need to increase our advertising or other customer acquisition costs to maintain or grow our reservation bookings and our business, gross bookings and results of operations could be adversely affected.
As a result of our acquisition of OpenTable, we now compete or may in the future compete with other restaurant reservation providers, such as LaFourchette, a European restaurant reservation business owned by TripAdvisor, and Yelp's SeatMe service.
Travel service providers, including multi-national hotel chains, rental car companies and airlines with which we conduct business, compete with us in online channels to drive consumers to their own websites in lieu of third-party distributors such as us. Travel service providers may charge lower prices and, in some instances, offer advantages such as loyalty points or special discounts to members of closed user groups (such as loyalty program participants or customers with registered accounts), any of which could make their offerings more attractive to consumers than our services. Discounting may increase as competition authorities seek to allow increased pricing flexibility among providers of travel service reservations. We may need to offer similar advantages to maintain or grow our reservation bookings, which could adversely impact our profitability.
There has been a proliferation of new channels through which accommodation providers can offer reservations. For example, companies such as HomeAway and Airbnb offer services focused on providing vacation rental property owners, particularly individuals, an online place to list their accommodations where travelers can search and book such properties. Companies such as HotelTonight, Tingo and Hipmunk have developed new and differentiated offerings that endeavor to provide savings on accommodation reservations to consumers and that compete directly with us. Further, meta-search services may lower the cost for new companies to enter the market by providing a distribution channel without the cost of promoting the new entrant's brand to drive consumers directly to its website. If any of these services are successful in attracting consumers who would otherwise use our services, our business and results of operations would be harmed.
Competition in U.S. online travel remains intense and online travel companies are creating new promotions and consumer value features in an effort to gain competitive advantages. In particular, the competition to provide "opaque" accommodation reservation services to consumers, an area in which our priceline.com business has been a leader, has become more intense. For example, Expedia makes opaque accommodation room reservations available through its Hotwire brand and on its principal website under the name "Expedia Unpublished Rates" and has, we believe, supported this initiative with steeper discounts through lower margins. We believe these offerings, in particular "Expedia Unpublished Rates," have adversely impacted the market share and year-over-year growth rate for priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® opaque hotel reservation service, which has been experiencing a decline in room night reservations since 2011. These and other competitors could also launch opaque rental car services, which could negatively impact priceline.com's opaque Name Your Own Price® rental car reservation service. If Expedia or others are successful in growing their opaque reservation services, we may have less consumer demand for our opaque reservation services over time, and we would face more competition for access to the limited supply of discounted reservation rates. As a result of this increased competition, our share of the discount accommodation reservation market in the United States could further decrease, which could harm our business and results of operations. In addition, high hotel occupancy levels in the United States have had an adverse impact on our access to hotel rooms for our opaque hotel reservation services. Further, growth in discounted closed user group retail prices for hotel rooms lessens the
price difference for members of the closed user group between a retail hotel reservation and an opaque hotel reservation, which may lead to fewer consumers using our opaque hotel reservation services.
In addition, after entering into an exclusive, long-term strategic marketing agreement in August 2013, Expedia acquired Travelocity in January 2015. On February 12, 2015, Expedia announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Orbitz. To the extent these acquisitions enhance Expedia's ability to compete with us, in particular in the United States, which is Expedia's, Travelocity's and Orbitz's largest market, our market share and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
We conduct a substantial majority of our business outside the United States but we report our results in U.S. Dollars. As a result, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international business are translated from local currency (principally the Euro and the British Pound Sterling) into U.S. Dollars. The U.S. Dollar significantly strengthened against the Euro during 2014, moving from an exchange rate of 1.38 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 1, 2014 to 1.21 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of December 31, 2014. The U.S. Dollar also strengthened significantly during this time frame as compared to many other currencies. As a result, our foreign currency denominated net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses and net income have been negatively impacted as expressed in U.S. Dollars. For example, gross profit from our international businesses grew year-over-year on a local currency basis by approximately 32% for the three months ended December 31, 2014, but, as a result of the impact of changes in currency exchange rates, grew by 24.2% as reported in U.S. Dollars.
Certain European Union countries with high levels of sovereign debt have had difficulty at times refinancing their debt. Concern around devaluation or abandonment of the Euro common currency, or that sovereign default risk may become more widespread and could include the United States, has led to significant volatility in the exchange rate between the Euro, the British Pound Sterling, the U.S. Dollar and other currencies. The European Central Bank, in an effort to stimulate the European economy, recently launched a quantitative easing program to purchase public debt, which in turn has caused the Euro exchange rate to weaken compared to the U.S. Dollar.
Significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates can affect consumer travel behavior. For example, recent dramatic depreciation of the Russian Ruble has resulted in it becoming more expensive for Russians to travel to Europe and most other non-Ruble destinations. Consumers traveling from a country whose currency has weakened against other currencies may book lower ADR accommodations, choose to shorten or cancel their international travel plans or choose to travel domestically rather than internationally, any of which could adversely affect our gross bookings, revenues and results of operations, in particular when expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains and losses that are reflected in our financial results.
The volatility in foreign exchange rates and their impact on consumer behavior, which may differ across regions, makes it more difficult to forecast industry and consumer trends and the timing and degree of their impact on our markets and business, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our business and adversely affect our results of operations.
We rely on onlineperformance and brand advertising channels to enhance our brand awareness and to generate a significant amount of traffic to our websites.websites and grow our business.
We believe that maintaining and expanding the Booking.com, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.com and OpenTable brands, along withstrengthening our other owned brands are important aspects of our efforts to attract and retain customers. Effective onlineWe have invested considerable money and resources in the establishment and maintenance of our brands, and we will continue to invest resources in brand advertising, marketing and other brand building efforts to preserve and enhance consumer awareness of our brands. In addition, effective performance advertising has been an important factor in our growth, and we believe it will continue to be important to our future success. As our competitors spend increasingly more on advertising, we are required to spend more in order to maintain our brand recognition and, in the case of onlineperformance advertising, to maintain and grow traffic to our websites. In addition, we have invested considerable money and resources in the establishment and maintenance of our brands, and we will continue to invest resources in advertising, marketing and other brand building efforts to preserve and enhance consumer awareness of our brands. We may not be able to successfully maintain or enhance consumer awareness and acceptance of our brands, and, even if we are successful in our branding efforts, such efforts may not be cost-effective. If we are unable to maintain or enhance consumer awareness and acceptance of our brands in a cost-effective manner, our business, market share and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
Our online performance advertising efficiency, expressed as onlineperformance advertising expense as a percentage of gross profit, is impacted by a number of factors that are subject to variability and that are, in some cases, outside of our control, including ADRs, costs per click, cancellation rates, foreign exchange rates, our ability to convert paid traffic to booking customers and the extent to which consumers come directly to our websites or mobile apps for bookings. For example, competition for desired rankings in search results and/or a decline in ad clicks by consumers could increase our costs-per-click and reduce our onlineperformance advertising efficiency. We use third partythird-party websites, including online search engines (primarily Google), meta-search and travel research services and affiliate marketing as primary means of generating traffic to our websites. Our onlineperformance advertising expense has increased significantly and our performance advertising efficiency has declined in recent years, a trend we expect to continue. In addition, from 20112016, performance advertising efficiency declined compared to 2013 our online advertising grew faster than our gross profitthe prior year, mainly due to (1) year-over-year declines in online advertising returns on investmentgrowth of paid traffic channels, lower ROIs and (2) brand mix within The Priceline Group as our international brands grew faster than our U.S. brands and spent a higher percentagetiming of booking versus travel resulting from accelerating gross profit on online advertising. In 2014, these trends continued, but were more than offset bybookings growth during the inclusion of KAYAK and OpenTable because they spend a lower percentage of gross profit on online advertising than our other brands. Also, our consolidated results exclude intercompany advertising by our brands on KAYAK since our acquisition of KAYAK in May 2013.year. Any reduction in our onlineperformance advertising efficiency could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, whether through reduced gross profit or gross profit growth or through advertising expenses increasing faster than gross profit and thereby reducing margins and earnings growth.
We believe that a number of factors could cause consumers to engage in increasedincrease their shopping behavioractivity before making a travel purchase than they engaged in previously.purchase. Increased shopping behavioractivity reduces our onlineperformance advertising efficiency and effectiveness because traffic becomes less likely to result in a purchase on our website, and such traffic is more likely to be obtained through paid onlineperformance advertising channels than through free direct channels. Further, consumers may favor travel services offered by search companies or meta-search sitescompanies over OTAs,OTCs, which could reduce traffic to our travel reservation websites, increase consumer awareness of our competitors' brands and websites, increase our advertising and other customer acquisition costs and adversely affect our business, margins and results of operations. To the extent any such increased shopping behavior leads to growth in our KAYAK meta-search business, such growth may not result in sufficient increases in revenues from our KAYAK meta-search business to offset any related decrease in gross profit or increase in advertising and other customer acquisition costs experienced by our OTAOTC brands.
Our business could be negatively affected by changes in Internet search engine algorithms and dynamics or traffic-generating arrangements.
We use Google to generate a significant portion of the traffic to our websites, and, to a lesser extent, we use other search engines and meta-search websites to generate traffic to our websites, principally through pay-per-click advertising campaigns. The pricing and operating dynamics on these search engines can experience rapid change commercially, technically and competitively. For example, Google frequently updates and changes the logic which determines the placement and display of results of a consumer's search, such that the placement of links to our websites can be negatively affected and our costs to improve or maintain our placement in search results can increase. Google's "Hotel Finder," a utility that allows consumers to search and compare hotel accommodations, has at times placed at or near the top of hotel-related search results. IfChanges by Google changesin how it presents travel
search results,including its promotion of its travel meta-search services, or the manner in which it conducts the auction for placement among search results in either case in a manner that ismay be competitively disadvantageous to us whether to support its own travel related services or otherwise,and may impact our ability to efficiently generate traffic to our websites, could be harmed, which in turn would have an adverse effect on our business, market share and results of operations.
In addition, we purchase website traffic from a number of other sources, including some operated by our competitors, in the form of pay-per-click arrangements that can be terminated with little or no notice. If one or more of such arrangements is terminated, our business, market share and results of operations could be adversely affected. Lastly, we rely on various third partythird-party distribution channels (i.e., marketing affiliates) to distribute accommodation, rental car and airline ticket reservations. Should one or more of such third parties cease distribution of reservations made through us, or suffer deterioration in its search engine ranking, due to changes in search engine algorithms or otherwise, our business, market share and results of operations could be negatively affected.
Recent trends in consumerConsumer adoption and use of mobile devices createcreates new challenges and may enable device companies such as Apple to compete directly with us.
Widespread adoption of mobile devices, such as the iPhone, Android-enabled smart phonessmartphones and tablets such as the iPad, coupled with the improved web browsing functionality and development of thousands of useful "apps"apps available on these devices, is driving substantial online traffic and commerce to mobile platforms. We have experienced a significant shift of business, both direct and indirect, to mobile platforms and our advertising partners are also seeing a rapid shift of traffic to mobile platforms. Our major competitors and certain new market entrants are offering mobile applicationsapps for travel products and other functionality,
including proprietary last-minute discounts for accommodation reservations. Advertising and distribution opportunities may be more limited on mobile devices given their smaller screen sizes. The gross profit earned on a mobile transaction may be less than a typical desktop transaction due to different consumer purchasing patterns. For example, accommodation reservations made on a mobile device typically are for shorter lengths of stay and are not made as far in advance. Further, given the device sizes and technical limitations of tablets and smartphones, mobile consumers may not be willing to download multiple apps from multiple companies providing a similar service and instead prefer to use one or a limited number of apps for their mobile travel and restaurant research and reservation activity. As a result, the consumer experience with mobile apps as well as brand recognition and loyalty are likely to become increasingly important. Our mobile offerings have received generally strong reviews and are driving a material and increasing share of our business. We believe that mobile bookings present an opportunity for growth and are necessary to maintain and grow our business as consumers increasingly turn to mobile devices instead of a personal computer. As a result, it is increasingly important for us to develop and maintain effective mobile apps and websites optimized for mobile devices to provide customersconsumers with an appealing, easy-to-use mobile experience. If we are unable to continue to rapidly innovate and create new, user-friendly and differentiated mobile offerings and efficiently and effectively advertise and distribute on these platforms, or if our mobile offerings are not used by consumers, we could lose market share to existing competitors or new entrants and our business, future growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Apple, one of the most innovative and successful companies in the world and producer of, among other things, the iPhone and iPad, obtained a patent for "iTravel," a mobile app that would allow a traveler to check in for a travel reservation. In addition, Apple's iPhone operating system includes "Passbook," a virtual wallet app that holds tickets, boarding passes, coupons and gift cards, and, along with iTravel, may be indicative of Apple's intent to enter the travel reservations business in some capacity. Apple has substantial market share in the smart phone category and controls integration of offerings, including travel services, into its mobile operating system. Apple also has more experience producing and developing mobile apps and has access to greater resources than we have. Apple may use or expand iTravel, Passbook, Siri (Apple's voice recognition "concierge" service), Apple Pay (Apple's new mobile payment system) or another mobile app or functionality as a means of entering the travel reservations marketplace. Similarly, Google's Android operating system is the leading smart phonesmartphone operating system in the world. As a result, Google could leverage its Android operating system to give its travel services a competitive advantage, either technically or with prominence on its Google Play app store or within its mobile search results. Further, Google is the leading Internet search service and has leveraged its search popularity to promote its travel meta-search services. Similarly, Apple, the producer of, among other things, the iPhone and iPad, obtained a patent for "iTravel," a mobile app that would allow a traveler to check in for a travel reservation. In addition, Apple's iPhone operating system includes "Wallet" (formerly known as "Passbook"), a virtual wallet app that holds tickets, boarding passes, coupons and gift cards, and, along with iTravel, may be indicative of Apple's intent to enter the travel reservations business in some capacity. Apple has substantial market share in the smartphone category and controls integration of offerings, including travel services, into its mobile operating system. Apple also has more experience producing and developing mobile apps and has access to greater resources than we have. Apple may use or expand iTravel, Wallet, Siri (Apple's voice recognition "concierge" service), Apple Pay (Apple's mobile payment system) or another mobile app or functionality as a means of entering the travel reservations marketplace. To the extent Apple or Google use their mobile operating systems, or app distribution channels or, in the case of Google, search services, to favor their own travel service offerings, our business and results of operations could be harmed.
We may not be able to keep up with rapid technological changes.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, consolidation, frequent new service announcements, introductions and enhancements and changing consumer demands. We may not be able to keep up with these rapid changes. In addition, these market characteristics are heightened by the progress of technology adoption in various markets, including the continuing adoption of the Internet and online commerce in certain geographies and the emergence and growth of the use of smartphones and tablets for mobile e-commerce transactions, including through the increasing use of mobile apps. As a result, our future success will depend on our ability to adapt to
rapidly changing technologies, to adapt our services to evolving industry standards and to continually innovate and improve the performance, features and reliability of our services in response to competitive service offerings and the evolving demands of the marketplace. In particular, we believe that it is increasingly important for us to effectively offer our services through mobile apps and mobile-optimized websites on smartphones and tablets. Any failure by us to successfully develop and achieve customer adoption of our mobile apps and mobile-optimized websites would likely have a material and adverse effect on our growth, market share, business and results of operations. Further, to the extent mobile devices enable users to block advertising content on their devices, our advertising revenue and our ability to market our brands and acquire new customers may be negatively affected. We believe that ease-of-use, comprehensive functionality and the look and feel of our mobile apps and mobile-optimized websites increasingly will be competitively critical as consumers obtain more of their travel and restaurant services through mobile devices. As a result, we intend to continue to spend significant resources maintaining, developing and enhancing our websites and mobile platforms, including our mobile-optimized websites and mobile apps, and other technologies.
In addition, the widespread adoption of new Internet, networking or telecommunications technologies or other technological changes (including new devices and services, such as Amazon's Echo and Alexa and Google Home, and developing technologies, such as artificial intelligence and chatbot technologies) could require us to incur substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure to those new technologies, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. For example, KAYAK generates revenues, in part, by allowing consumers to compare search results that appear in additional "pop-under" windows. Changes in browser functionality, such as changes that either block or otherwise limit the use of "pop-under" windows, at times have had a negative impact on our revenues. Any failure to implement or adapt to new technologies in a timely manner or at all could adversely affect our ability to compete, increase our customer acquisition costs or otherwise adversely affect our business, and therefore adversely affect our brand, market share and results of operations.
Our processing, storage, use and disclosure of personal data exposes us to risks of internal or external security breaches and could give rise to liabilities.
The security of data when engaging in electronic commerce is essential to maintaining consumer and travel service provider confidence in our services. Any security breach whether instigated internally or externally on our systemsystems or other Internet basedInternet-based systems could significantly harm our reputation and therefore our business, brand, market share and results of operations. We currently require consumers who use certain of our services to guarantee their offers with their credit card, either online or, in some instances, through our toll-free telephone service.card. We require user names and passwords in order to access our information technology systems. We also use encryption and authentication technologies to secure the transmission and storage of data and prevent unauthorized access to our data or accounts. It is possible that computer circumvention capabilities, new discoveries or advances or other developments, including our own acts or omissions, could result in a compromise or breach of consumer data. For example, third parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees or customers to disclose user names, passwords or other sensitive information ("phishing"), which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems or to defraud our customers. We have experienced targeted and organized phishing attacks and may experience more in the future. Our efforts to protect information from unauthorized access may be unsuccessful or may result in the rejection of legitimate attempts to book reservations through our services, any of which could result in lost business and materially adversely affect our business, reputation and results of operations.
Our existing security measures may not be successful in preventing security breaches. A party (whether internal, external, an affiliate or unrelated third party) that is able to circumvent our security systems could steal consumer information or transaction data or other proprietary information. In the last few years, several major companies, including Yahoo!, Sony, HomeDepot,Home Depot, JPMorgan, Target, Zappos, Apple, AOL, LinkedIn Google, and Yahoo!Google experienced high-profile security breaches that exposed their customers' andand/or employees' personal information. We expend significant resources to protect against security breaches, and we may need to increase our security relatedsecurity-related expenditures to maintain or increase our systems' security or to address problems caused and liabilities incurred by breaches. These issues are likely to become more difficult to manage as we expand the number of places where we operate and as the tools and techniques used in such attacks become more advanced. As recently experienced by Sony, security breaches could result in severe damage to our information technology infrastructure, including damage that could impair our ability to offer our services or the ability of consumers to make reservations or conduct searches through our services, as well as loss of customer, financial or other data that could materially
and adversely affect our ability to conduct our business, satisfy our commercial obligations or meet our public reporting requirements in a timely fashion or at all. Security breaches could also result in negative publicity, damage our reputation, expose us to risk of loss or litigation and possible liability, subject us to regulatory penalties and sanctions, or cause consumers to lose confidence in our security and choose to use the services of our competitors, any of which would have a negative effect on the value of our brand, our market share and our results of operations. Our insurance policies carry low coverage limits, and would likely not be adequate to reimburse us for all losses caused by security breaches.
We also face risks associated with security breaches affecting third parties conducting business over the Internet. Consumers generally are concerned with security and privacy on the Internet, and any publicized security problems could inhibit the growth of the Internet and negatively affect consumers' willingness to provide private information or effect commercial transactions on the Internet generally, including through our services. Some of our business is conducted with third partythird-party marketing affiliates, which may generate travel reservations through our infrastructure or through other systems. Additionally, consumers using our services could be affected by security breaches at third parties such as travel service providers, payroll providers, health plan providers, payment processors or global distribution systems ("GDSs") upon which we rely. A security breach at any such third partythird-party marketing affiliate, travel service provider, GDS or other third party on which we rely could be perceived by consumers as a security breach of our systems and in any event could result in negative publicity, damage our reputation, expose us to risk of loss or litigation and possible liability and subject us to regulatory penalties and sanctions. In addition, such third parties may not comply with applicable disclosure requirements, which could expose us to liability.
In our processing of travel transactions, we receive and store a large volume of personally identifiable data. This data is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous jurisdictions around the world, includingsuch as the European Union's Data Protection Directive and variations and implementations of that directive in the member states of the European Union. In addition, in April 2016 the European Union is actively consideringadopted a new General Data Protection Regulation designed to unify data protection withwithin the European Union under a single law, which may result in significantly greater compliance burdens and costs for companies with users and operations in the European Union. Under the draft General Data Protection Regulation, fines of up to 100,000,00020 million Euros or up to 5%4% of the annual global turnover of the infringer, whichever is greater, could be imposed. This government action is typically intended to protect the privacy of personal data that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also to transfers of information between us and our subsidiaries, including employee information. The new General Data Protection Regulation is not expected to apply to us until May 2018. In February 2016, E.U. and U.S. authorities announced that they had reached agreement on a new data transfer framework, called the E.U.-U.S. Privacy Shield, which was formally adopted by the European Commission on July 12, 2016. The European Union and the United States are implementing the new framework, but it is expected to be subject to legal challenge. These laws and their interpretations continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Non-compliance with these laws could result in penalties or significant legal liability. We could be adversely affected if legislation or regulations are expanded to require changes in our business practices or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We are also subject to payment card association rules and obligations under our contracts with payment card processors. Under these rules and obligations, if information is compromised, we could be liable to payment card issuers for associated expenses and penalties. In addition, if we fail to follow payment card industry security standards, even if no customer information is compromised, we could incur significant fines or experience a significant increase in payment card transaction costs.
System capacity constraints, system failures or "denial-of-service" or other attacks could harm our business.
We have experienced rapid growth in consumer traffic to our websites and through our mobile apps, the number of accommodations on our extranets and the geographic breadth of our operations. If our systems cannot be expanded to cope with increased demand or fail to perform, we could experience unanticipated disruptions in service, slower response times, decreased customer service and customer satisfaction and delays in the introduction of new services, any of which could impair our reputation, damage our brands and materially and adversely affect our results of operations. Further, as an online business, we are dependent on the Internet and maintaining connectivity between ourselves and consumers, sources of Internet traffic, such as Google, and our travel service providers. As consumers increasingly turn to mobile devices, we also become dependent on consumers' access to the Internet through mobile carriers and their systems. Disruptions in Internet access, such as the denial of service attack against Dyn in October 2016 that resulted in a service outage for a number of major Internet companies, whether generally, in a specific market or otherwise, especially if widespread or prolonged, could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. While we do maintain redundant systems and hosting services, it is possible that we could experience an interruption in our business, and we do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for all losses that may occur.
Our computer hardware for operating our services is currently located at hosting facilities around the world. These systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from human error, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures and similar events. They are also subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism, terrorism and similar misconduct. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of any disruption of service due to any
such misconduct, natural disaster or other unanticipated problems at such facilities, or the failure by such facilities to provide our required data communications capacity could result in lengthy interruptions or delays in our services. Any system failure
that causes an interruption or delay in service could impair our reputation, damage our brands or result in consumers choosing to use a competitive service, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our existing security measures may not be successful in preventing attacks on our systems, and any such attack could cause significant interruptions in our operations. For instance, from time to time, we have experienced "denial-of-service" type attacks on our systems that have made portions of our websites slow or unavailable for periods of time. There are numerous other potential forms of attack, such as "phishing" (where a third party attempts to infiltrate our systems or acquire information by posing as a legitimate inquiry or electronic communication), SQL injection (where a third party attempts to obtain information or otherwise insert malicious code into our software through data entry fields in our websites)websites in order to gain control of the system) and attempting to use our websites as a platform to launch a "denial-of-service" attack on another party, each of which could cause significant interruptions in our operations and potentially adversely affect our brand, operations and results of operations or involve us in legal or regulatory proceedings. We expend significant resources in an attempt to prepare for and mitigate the effects of any such attacks. Reductions in website availability and response time could cause loss of substantial business volumes during the occurrence of any such attack on our systems, and measures we may take to divert suspect traffic in the event of such an attack could result in the diversion of bona fide customers. These issues are likely to become more difficult to manage as we expand the number of places where we operate and as the tools and techniques used in such attacks become more advanced. Successful attacks could result in negative publicity, damage our reputation and prevent consumers from booking travel services, researching travel services or making restaurant reservations through us during the attack, any of which could cause consumers to use the services of our competitors, which would have a negative effect on the value of our brands, our market share, business and our results of operations.
We rely on certain third partythird-party computer systems and third partythird-party service providers, including GDSs and computerized central reservation systems of the accommodation, rental car and airline industries in connection with providing some of our services. Any interruption in these third partythird-party services and systems or deterioration in their performance could prevent us from booking related accommodation, rental car and airline reservations and have a material adverse effect on our business, brands and results of operations. Our agreements with some third partythird-party service providers are terminable upon short notice and often do not provide recourse for service interruptions. In the event our arrangement with any such third party is terminated, we may not be able to find an alternative source of systems support on a timely basis or on commercially reasonable terms and, as a result, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We depend upon various third parties to process payments, including credit cards, for our merchant transactions around the world. In addition, we rely on third parties to provide credit card numbers which we use as a payment mechanism for merchant transactions. If any such third party were wholly or partially compromised, our cash flows could be disrupted or we may not be able to generate merchant transactions (and related revenues) until such a time as a replacement process could be put in place with a different vendor.
We do not have a completely formalized or comprehensive disaster recovery plan in every geographic region in which we conduct business. In the event of certain system failures, we may not be able to switch to back-up systems immediately and the time to full recovery could be prolonged. Like many online businesses, we have experienced system failures from time to time. In addition to placing increased burdens on our engineering staff, these outages create a significant amount of consumer questions and complaints that need to be addressed by our customer support personnel. Any unscheduled interruption in our service could result in an immediate loss of revenues that cancould be substantial, increase customer service cost,costs, harm our reputation and causeresult in some consumers to switchswitching to our competitors. If we experience frequent or persistent system failures, our reputation and brand could be permanently and significantly harmed. We have taken and continue to take steps to increase the reliability and redundancy of our systems. These steps are expensive, may reduce our margins and may not be successful in reducing the frequency or duration of unscheduled downtime.
We use both internally developed systems and third-party systems to operate our services, including transaction processing, order management and financial systems. If the number of consumers using our services increases substantially, or if critical third-party systems stop operating as designed, we will need to significantly expand and upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems, financial and accounting systems and other infrastructure. We may not be able to upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate such conditions in a timely manner, and, depending on the third-party systems affected, our transactional, financial and accounting systems could be impacted for a meaningful amount of time before upgrade, expansion or repair.
We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities.
As an international business providing reservation and advertising services around the world, we are subject to income taxes and non-income basednon-income-based taxes in both the United States and various non-U.S.international jurisdictions. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates and tax regimes in various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. Our future effective tax rates
could be affected by changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets or changes in tax laws or their interpretation. If our effective tax rates were to increase, our cash flows,results of operations, financial condition and results of operationscash flows would be adversely affected.
Although we believe that our tax filing positions are reasonable and comply with applicable law, the final determination of tax audits or tax disputes may be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. To date, we have been audited in severalmany taxing jurisdictions with no significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. If future audits find that additional taxes are due, we may be subject to incremental tax liabilities, possibly including interest and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows,results of operations, financial condition and results of operations.cash flows.
For example, French tax authorities have initiatedrecently concluded an audit to determine whether wethat started in 2013 of the tax years 2003 through 2012. The French authorities are in compliance with our tax obligationsasserting that Booking.com has a permanent establishment in France and we expectare seeking to get a preliminary response inrecover what they claim are unpaid income taxes and value-added taxes. In December 2015, the first halfFrench tax authorities issued assessments for approximately 356 million Euros, the majority of 2015. While wewhich represents penalties and interest. We believe that we complyBooking.com has been, and continues to be, in compliance with French tax law, and we intend to contest the assessments. If we are unable to resolve the matter with the French authorities, we would expect to challenge the assessments in the French tax authorities to assert that we owe additional taxes and issue an assessment, which could be significant and which could include penalties and interest. In addition, wecourts. We may be required to pay, upfront, the full amount or a significant part of any such assessment in order to appeal it,assessments, though any such payment would not constitute an admission by us that we owe the tax.taxes. At the end of 2016, the French authorities announced their intent to also audit the tax years 2013 to 2015, which could result in additional assessments.
Italian tax authorities have initiated a process to determine whether we should be subject to additional tax obligations in Italy. Italian tax authorities may determine that we owe additional taxes, and may also assess penalties and interest. We believe that we have been, and continue to be, in compliance with Italian tax law. In general, governments in the United States and Europe are increasingly focused on ways to increase tax revenues, which has contributed to an increase in audit activity and harsher stances taken by tax authorities. Any such additional taxes or other assessments may be in excess of our current tax provisions or may require us to modify our business practices in order to reduce our exposure to additional taxes going forward, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We will be subject to increased income taxes in the event that our cash balances held outside the United States are remitted to the United States.
As of December 31, 2014,2016, we held approximately $6.9$12.6 billion of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments outside of the United States. We currently intend to use our cash held outside the United States to reinvest in our non-U.S.international operations. If ourthat intention changes and we decide to repatriate that cash balances outsideto the United States, continuewhether due to grow and our ability to reinvest those balances outside the United States diminishes, it will become increasingly likely that we will be subject to additional income tax expensecash needs in the United States with respect to our unremitted non-U.S. earnings. Weor otherwise, we would notincur related U.S. income tax expense, and we would only make additional income tax payments unlesswhen we were to actually repatriate our international cash to the United States.cash. We would pay only U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and certain U.S. state income taxes as long as we have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset our U.S. taxable income. ThisIf our foreign earnings were repatriated, this could result in us being subject to a cash income tax liability on the earnings of our U.S. businesses sooner than would otherwise have been the case. After our net operating loss carryforwards have been fully utilized, foreign tax credits associated with the repatriation of international cash may be used to reduce U.S. federal taxes on the repatriation.
Various legislative proposals that wouldhave been put forward to reform U.S. corporate income tax laws have been proposed by President Obama's administration as well as members of the U.S. Congress,law, including proposals that would significantly impact how and at what rates U.S. multinational corporationsmultinationals are taxed on foreigninternational earnings. SuchThese proposals include changes that would reducerange from changing the U.S. worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system on the one hand to eliminating the current tax deferral system altogether on the other, introducing a border-adjustment tax that exempts exports but taxes imports, and permitting the expensing of the full cost of certain foreign digital goodstangible and services transactions, impose a minimum U.S.intangible property in the year of investment, but limiting interest deductions to interest income with any excess deduction being carried forward to the following year. Other tax on foreign earnings, limit U.S. deductions forreform proposals advanced include limiting interest expense related to un-repatriated non-U.S.-source income, limit interest and royalty deductions in connection with certain related party transactionsthin capitalization circumstances or eliminating all interest deductions, eliminating all business tax expenditures including deductions, exemptions and put in place certainmost credits (excluding R&D credits), changing the rules on the use of net operating losses, potential reduction of U.S. corporate tax disincentives for offshoring jobs or business segments.rates and allowing international earnings accumulated under the current system to be repatriated to the U.S. at a favorable tax rate. We cannot determine whether some or all of these or other proposals will be enacted into law or what, if any, changes may be made to such proposals prior to being enacted into law. If U.S. tax laws change in a manner that increases our tax obligations, our financial position and results of operations could be adversely impacted.
Additionally, in October 2015, the Organisation for Economic Co-OperationCo-operation and Development ("OECD") issued an action plan"final reports" in July 2013 calling for a coordinated multi-jurisdictional approach toconnection with its "base erosion and profit shifting" by multinational companies.("BEPS") project. The action plan expressedOECD, with the OECD's viewsupport of the G20, initiated this project in 2013 in response to concerns that international tax standards have not kept pace with changes in global business practices and concluded that changes are needed to international tax laws to address situations where multinationalsmultinational businesses may pay little or no tax in certain jurisdictions by shifting profits away from jurisdictions where the activities creating those
profits may take place. The action plan identifiedfinal reports were endorsed by the G20 leaders in November 2015. The final reports propose 15 actions the OECD determined are needed to address "basebase erosion and profit shifting"shifting, including: (a) enhancing transparency through the sharing of tax information between countries; (b) prescribing standardized country-by-country reporting and generally set target datesother documentation requirements aimed at identifying where profits, tax and economic activities occur; (c) preventing harmful tax practices including the use of preferential tax regimes; (d) modernizing the OECD's transfer pricing rules related to intangibles; (e) changing the definition of permanent establishment to prevent artificial avoidance of tax nexus; and (f) limiting tax base erosion through interest deductions and other financial payments. The measures have resulted in the development of a multilateral instrument to incorporate and facilitate changes to tax treaties. On January 28, 2016, the European Commission unveiled a new package of proposals aimed at providing a framework for completion of eachfairer taxation and to provide a coordinated European Union response to combating corporate tax avoidance. Following agreement among the European Union member states on the final content of the items between 2014package, the European Council formally adopted an Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive on July 12, 2016. The Directive is aimed at preventing aggressive tax planning, increasing tax transparency and 2015. Reports addressing 7 ofcreating a fairer tax environment for all businesses in the European Union. We expect many countries to change their tax laws in response to these actions were released by the OECDdevelopments, and several countries have already changed or proposed changes to their tax laws in September 2014. The proposed measures contained in these reports are not yet finalized as they may be affected by the proposals to be made with respectresponse to the remaining actions.final BEPS reports and/or the developments in the European Union. Any changes to international tax laws, including new definitions of permanent establishment or changes affecting the benefits of preferential tax regimes such as the Dutch "Innovation Box Tax" (discussed below), could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings and adversely impact our effective tax rate. Further, changes to tax laws and additional reporting requirements could increase the complexity, burden and cost of compliance. Due to the large and expanding scale of our international business activities, any changes in U.S.
or international taxation of our activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate, increase the complexity and couldcosts associated with tax compliance (especially if changes are implemented or interpreted inconsistently across tax jurisdictions) and adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
We are also subject to non-income basednon-income-based taxes, such as value-added, payroll, sales, use, net worth, property and goods and services taxes, in the United States and various non-U.S.international jurisdictions, as well as the potential for travel transaction taxes in the United States as discussed below and in Note 1614 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. For example, in July 2012 and December 2013, the Dutch Government enacted certain amendments to Dutch tax law including one-time levies on an employer applied to employee earnings, equal to 16% of an employee's earnings in excess of 150,000 Euros. These irrevocable levies resulted in additional payroll taxes of approximately $12 million (approximately $9 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and approximately $14 million (approximately $10 million after tax) principally recorded in the third quarter of 2012. From time to time, we are under audit by tax authorities with respect to these non-income basednon-income-based taxes and may have exposure to additional non-income basednon-income-based tax liabilities.
We may not be able to maintain our "Innovation Box Tax" benefit.
The Netherlands corporate income tax law provides that income generated from qualifying "innovative"innovative activities is taxed at the rate of 5% ("Innovation Box Tax") rather than the Dutch statutory rate of 25%. Booking.com obtained a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities confirming that aA portion of itsBooking.com's earnings ("qualifying earnings") is eligiblecurrently qualifies for Innovation Box Tax treatment. This ruling was renewed in July 2013 and is valid throughIn the year ended December 31, 2017.2016, the Innovation Box Tax benefit reduced our consolidated income tax expense by approximately $324.6 million.
In order to be eligible for Innovation Box Tax treatment, Booking.com must, among other things, apply for and obtain a research and development ("R&D") certificate from a Dutch governmental agency every six months confirming that the activities that Booking.com intends to be engaged in over the subsequent six monthsix-month period are "innovative." The R&D certificate is current but should Booking.com fail to secure such a certificate in any future period - for example, because the governmental agency does not view Booking.com's new or anticipated activities as innovative - or should this agency determine that the activities contemplated to be performed in a prior period were not performed as contemplated or did not comply with the agency's requirements, Booking.com may lose its certificate and, as a result, the Innovation Box Tax benefit may be reduced or eliminated. Booking.com intends to apply for continued Innovation Box Tax treatment for future periods. However, Booking.com's application may not be accepted, or, if accepted, the amount of qualifying earnings may be reduced or the applicable tax rate on qualifying earnings may be higher than the current rate.reduced.
In addition, the tax lawlaws may change resulting in a reduction or elimination of the tax benefit. As discussed above, the OECD's action plan involves, in part, evaluation of preferential tax regimes such as the Innovation Box Tax. The European Union Council of Economics and Finance Ministers ("ECOFIN") has endorsed changes to limit member states' existing innovation and patent box tax regimes providing benefits related to profits derived from intangible assets such as intellectual property. The changesOECD's October 2015 final reports recommend that intellectual property qualifying for such tax regimes generally be limited to patents and other intellectual property assets that are functionally equivalent to patents (such as copyrighted software) if those other assets are both legally protected and subject to similar approval and registration processes as apply to patents. ECOFIN has endorsed by ECOFIN would, if adopted, limit such benefits onlythe OECD's modified nexus approach and the European Union Code of Conduct Group will monitor legislative processes in 2016 necessary for European Union member states to profits derived from patentable intellectual property. It is expected that the legislative process relatedchange their existing "IP box" regimes to conform to the proposed changes will beginmodified nexus approach, which requires full implementation in 2015. However, the proposals may not be adopted in the form endorsed by ECOFIN or at all, and it is expected that any changes will include transition rules and will be fully implementedmember states no later than July 2021. ToOn May 19, 2016, the extent Booking.com's intellectual property developed by its innovative activitiesDutch government launched a public Internet consultation process on proposed legislative changes to the Dutch Innovation Box Tax regime based on the above-mentioned recommendations made in the OECD's final BEPS report and recent evaluations on the working of the Dutch Innovation Box Tax. The proposed legislative changes were
introduced in the Dutch Parliament in September 2016 and approved in December 2016. The new innovation tax rules took effect on January 1, 2017, but also include transition rules. We do not meetexpect the requirements under any new legislation Booking.com would eventually lose the benefit ofto have a significant impact on Booking.com's eligibility for the Innovation Box Tax.
The loss of the Innovation Box Tax benefit (or any material portion thereof), whether due to a change in tax law or a determination by the Dutch government that Booking.com's activities are not "innovative" or for any other reason, would substantially increase our effective tax rate and adversely impact our results of operations.
Our financial results will likely be materially impacted by payment of income taxes in the future.
Until our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards are utilized or expire, we do not expect to make tax payments on most of our U.S. income, except for U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and state income taxes. However, we expect to pay non-U.S. taxes on our non-U.S. income other than in countries where we have operating loss carryforwards. We expect that our international business will continue to generate most of our revenues and profits and will continue to grow pretax income at a higher rate than our U.S. business and, therefore, we expect that our tax payments will continue to increase. Any increase in our effective tax rate would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Adverse application of U.S. state and local tax laws could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
A number of jurisdictions in the United States have initiated lawsuits against online travel companies, including us, related to, among other things, the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). In addition, a number of U.S. states, counties and municipalities have initiated audit proceedings, issued proposed tax
assessments or started inquiries relating to the payment of travel transaction taxes. See Part I Item 3 Legal Proceedings and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of these pending cases and proceedings. Additional state and local jurisdictions may assert that we are subject to, among other things, travel transaction taxes and could seek to collect such taxes, either retroactively or prospectively, or both.
In connection with some travel transaction tax audits and assessments, we may be required to pay any assessed taxes, which amounts may be substantial, prior to being allowed to contest the assessments and the applicability of the laws in judicial proceedings. This requirement is commonly referred to as "pay to play" or "pay first." Payment of these amounts, if any, is not an admission that we believe that we are subject to such taxes and, even if we make such payments, we intend to continue to vigorously assert our position that we should not be subject to such taxes.
Litigation is subject to uncertainty and there could be adverse developments in these pending or future cases and proceedings. For example, in September 2012, the Superior Court in the District of Columbia granted a summary judgment in favor of the city and against online travel companies. Similarly, in January 2013, the Tax Appeal Court for the State of Hawaii held that online travel companies, including us, are liable for the State's general excise tax on the full amount the online travel company collects from the customer for a hotel room reservation, without any offset for amounts passed through to the hotel. We recorded an accrual for travel transaction taxes (including estimated interest and penalties) of approximately $16.5 million in December 2012 and approximately $18.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily related to this ruling. During the year ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014 the Company paid approximately $20.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the State of Hawaii related to this ruling. The Company has filed an appeal with the Tax Appeal Court and intends to vigorously appeal this ruling. These decisions and any similar decisions in other jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, margins and results of operations. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending litigation may encourage the commencement of additional litigation, audit proceedings or other regulatory inquiries. In addition, an unfavorable outcome or settlement of these actions or proceedings could result in substantial liabilities for past and/or future bookings, including, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorney fees and costs. There have been, and will continue to be, substantial ongoing costs, which may include "pay first" payments, associated with defending our position in pending and any future cases or proceedings. An adverse outcome in one or more of these unresolved proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could be material to our results of operations or cash flows in any given fiscal period.
To the extent that any tax authority succeeds in asserting that we have a tax collection responsibility, or we determine that we have such a responsibility, with respect to future transactions we may collect any such additional tax obligation from our customers, which would have the effect of increasing the cost of travel reservations to our customers and, consequently, could make our travel reservation service less competitive (i.e., versus the websites of other online travel companies or travel service providers) and reduce our travel reservation transactions; alternatively, we could choose to reduce our profit on affected travel transactions. Either action could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In many of the judicial and other proceedings initiated to date, the taxing jurisdictions seek not only historical taxes that are claimed to be owed on our gross profit, but also, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorneyattorneys' fees and costs. Therefore, any liability associated with travel transaction tax matters is not constrained to our liability for tax owed, but may also include, among other things, penalties, interest and attorneys' fees. To date, the majoritymany of the taxing jurisdictions in which we facilitate travel reservations have not asserted that taxes are due and payable on our travel services. With respect to taxing jurisdictions that have not initiated proceedings to date, it is possible that they will do so in the future or that they will seek to amend their tax statutes and seek to collect taxes from us only on a prospective basis.
We face increased risks as the level of our debt increases.
We have a substantial amount of outstanding indebtednessIn connection with some travel transaction tax audits and we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, including through public or private offerings of debt securities. Our outstanding indebtedness and any additional indebtedness we incur may have significant consequences, which could include:
requiring the dedication of a significant portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures, share repurchases and acquisitions;
increased vulnerability to downturns in our business, to competitive pressures and to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions;
decreased ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, share repurchases or other general corporate purposes; and
decreased flexibility when planning for or reacting to changes in our business and industry.
Our ability to make payments of principal of and interest on our indebtedness depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our consolidated results of operations and financial condition, many of which are beyond our control. Further, we may not have access to equity or debt markets or other sources of financing, or such financing may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, to repay or refinance our debt as it comes due or, in the case of our convertible notes, upon conversion. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from our U.S. operations in the future to service our debt,assessments, we may be required to pay any assessed taxes, which amounts may be substantial, prior to being allowed to contest the assessments and the applicability of the laws in judicial proceedings. Payment of these amounts, if any, is not an admission that we believe that we are subject to such taxes and, even if we make such payments, we intend to continue to assert our position that we should not be subject to such taxes.
Litigation is subject to uncertainty and there could be adverse developments in these pending or future cases and proceedings. Adverse tax decisions could have a material adverse effect on our business, margins and results of operations. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending litigation may encourage the commencement of additional litigation, audit proceedings or other regulatory inquiries. In addition, an unfavorable outcome or settlement of these actions or proceedings could result in substantial liabilities for past and/or future bookings, including, among other things, repatriate funds to the United States at substantial tax cost.interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorneys' fees and costs.
We are dependent on providers of accommodations, rental cars and airline tickets and on restaurants.
We rely on providers of accommodations, rental cars and airline tickets and on restaurants to make their services available to consumers through us. Our arrangements with travel service providers generally do not require them to make available any specific quantity of accommodation reservations, rental cars or airline tickets, or to make accommodation reservations, rental cars or airline tickets available in any geographic area, for any particular route or at any particular price. Similarly, our arrangements with restaurants generally do not require them to provide all of their available tables and reservations to customers through us. During the course of our business, we are in continuous dialogdialogue with our major travel service providers about the nature and extent of their participation in our services. A significant reduction on the part of any of our major travel service providers or providers that are particularly popular with consumers in their participation in our services for a sustained period of time or their complete withdrawal could have a material adverse effect on our business, market share and results of operations. To the extent any of those major or popular travel service providers ceased to participate in our services in favor of one of our competitors' systems or decided to require consumers to purchase services directly from them, our business, market share and results of operations could be harmed. During periods of higher occupancy rates, accommodation providers may decrease their distribution of accommodation reservations through third-party intermediaries like us, in particular through our discount services such as priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® services. Further, as consolidation among travel service providers increases, the potential adverse effect of a decision by any particular significant travel service provider (such as a large hotel chain, airline or rental car company) to withdraw from or reduce its participation in our services also increases. To the extent restaurants limit the availability of reservations through OpenTable, consumers may not continue to use our services and/or our revenues could be adversely affected, especially if reservations during highly desirable times on high volume days are not made available through us.
Further, KAYAK, a meta-search service, depends on access to information related to travel service pricing, schedules, availability and other related information from OTAsOTCs and travel service providers to attract consumers. To obtain this information, KAYAK maintains relationships with travel service providers and OTAs.OTCs. Many of KAYAK's agreements with travel service providers and OTAsOTCs are short-term agreements that may be terminated on 30 days' notice. To the extent OTAsOTCs or travel service providers no longer provide such information to KAYAK, KAYAK's ability to provide comprehensive travel service information to consumers could be diminished and its brand, business and results of operations could be harmed. To the extent consumers do not view KAYAK as a reliable source of comprehensive travel service information, fewer consumers would likely visit its websites, which would also likely have a negative impact on KAYAK's advertising revenue and results of operations. In addition, if travel service providers or OTAsOTCs choose not to advertise with KAYAK or choose to reduce or eliminate the fees paid to KAYAK for referrals from query results, KAYAK's business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on the performance of highly skilled personnel; and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel or hire, retain and motivate qualified personnel, our business would be harmed.
Our performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. In particular, the contributions of certain key senior management in the United States, Europe and Asia are critical to the overall management of our business. We may not be able to retain the services of any members of our senior management or other key employees, the loss of whom could harm our business.business and competitive position.
In addition, competition for well-qualified employees in all aspects of our business, including software engineers, mobile communication talent and other technology professionals, is intense both in the United States and abroad. Our international success in particular has led to increased efforts by our competitors and others to hire our international employees. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate existing employees. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified employees or retaining and motivating existing employees, our business, competitive position and results of operations would be adversely affected. We do not maintain any key person life insurance policies.
As the size of our business grows, we may become increasingly subject to the scrutiny of anti-trust and competition regulators.
In July 2012, the Office of Fair Trading (the "OFT"), the predecessor competition authority in the United Kingdom to the Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA"), issued a "Statement of Objections" ("SO") to Booking.com, which set out the OFT's preliminary views on why it believed Booking.com and others in the online accommodation reservation sector were allegedly in breach of E.U. and U.K. competition law. The SO alleged, among other things, that there were agreements or concerted practices between accommodations and Booking.com and at least one other online travel company that restrictedindustry has become the subject of investigations by various national competition authorities ("NCAs"), particularly in Europe. We are or have been involved in investigations predominately related to whether Booking.com's (and the other online travel company's) abilitycontractual parity arrangements with accommodation providers, sometimes also referred to discount hotelas "most favored nation" or "MFN" provisions, are anti-competitive because they require accommodation providers to provide Booking.com with room reservations, which the OFT alleged was a form of resale price maintenance. We dispute the allegations in the SO. Booking.com runs an agency model accommodation reservation platform in which accommodations have complete discretion and control over setting the prices that appear on the Booking.com website. Booking.com is a facilitator of accommodation room reservations; it does not take possession of or title to accommodation rooms and is not a reseller of accommodation rooms. Because Booking.com plays no role in price setting, does not control pricing and does not resell accommodation rooms, it does not believe that it engages in the conduct alleged in the SO. On January 31, 2014, the OFT announced that it had accepted commitments offered by Booking.com, as well as by Expedia and Intercontinental Hotel Group, ("Commitments") to close the investigation on the basis that they address the OFT's competition concerns. The OFT closed its investigation with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine. The Commitments provide, among other things, that hotels will continue to be able to set retail prices for hotel room reservations on all online travel company websites, such as Booking.com. Under the Commitments, online travel companies, such as Booking.com, have the flexibility to discount a hotel's retail price, but only to members of closed groups, a concept that is defined in the Commitments, who have previously made a reservation with the online travel company. The discount may be up to Booking.com's commission. In addition, the Commitments provide that Booking.com will not require rate parity from hotels in relation to discounted rates that are providedat least as low as those offered to other OTCs or through the accommodation provider's website.
Investigations into Booking.com's parity provisions were initiated in 2013 and 2014 by other online travel companies or hotels to members of their closed groups, provided the discounted rate is not made public. The Commitments apply to bookings by European Economic Area residents at U.K. hotels. On March 31, 2014, Skyscanner, a meta-search site basedNCAs in the United Kingdom, filed an appeal in the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") against the OFT's decision to accept the Commitments. Booking.com intervened in support of the CMA in the CAT. In its decision dated September 26, 2014, the CAT found that the CMA was wrong to reject Skyscanner's arguments about the negative impact of the Commitments on its business and price transparency generally without properly exploring these arguments. The CAT's decision vacates the CMA's Commitments decision and remits the matter to the CMA for reconsideration in accordance with the CAT's ruling. It is uncertain what action the CMA will take in response to the CAT's ruling, which could involve re-opening, closing or suspending the investigation. The CMA did not appeal the CAT's decision. As many industry participants have been operating based on the substance of the Commitments since they were adopted, it is uncertain how the CAT's decision and any resulting action by the CMA will affect industry practice, including discounting to closed user groups, the status of rate parity clauses found in many online travel companies' contracts with hotels and other travel service providers, and our business and results of operations.
The competition authorities of many governments have begun investigations into competitive practices within the online travel industry, and we may be involved or affected by such investigations and their results. In addition to the U.K. investigation discussed above, national competition authorities in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Sweden, Ireland Denmark and Switzerland,Switzerland. A number of other NCAs have openedalso looked at these issues. On April 21, 2015, the French, Italian and Swedish NCAs, working in close cooperation with the European Commission, announced that they had accepted "commitments" offered by Booking.com to resolve and close the investigations in France, Italy and Sweden. Under the commitments, Booking.com replaced its existing price parity agreements with accommodation providers with "narrow" price parity agreements. Under a "narrow" price parity agreement, subject to certain exceptions, an accommodation provider is still required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offers to a consumer directly online, but it is no longer required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offers to other OTCs. The commitments also allow an accommodation provider to, among other things, offer different terms and conditions (e.g., free WiFi) and availability to consumers that focusbook with online travel companies that offer lower rates of commission or other benefits, offer lower rates to consumers that book through offline channels and continue to discount through, among other things, accommodation loyalty programs, as long as those rates are not published or marketed online. The commitments apply to accommodations in France, Italy and Sweden and were effective on July 1, 2015. The foregoing description is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the commitments published by the NCAs on April 21, 2015.
On July 1, 2015, Booking.com voluntarily implemented the commitments given to the French, Italian and Swedish NCAs throughout the European Economic Area and Switzerland. Nearly all NCAs in the European Economic Area have now closed their investigations following Booking.com's rateimplementation of the commitments in their jurisdictions. Booking.com has also recently resolved the concerns of the NCAs in Australia, New Zealand and Georgia by agreeing to implement the "narrow" price parity clause in its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions. Competition related inquiries have also been received from the competition authority in China.these countries. The Turkish NCA recently imposed fines on Booking.com following an investigation into Booking.com's "wide" parity clauses. We are in ongoing discussions with the relevant regulatory authorities various NCAs in other countries
regarding their concerns. We are currently unable to predict the outcome of alllong-term impact the implementation of these commitments will have on Booking.com's business, on investigations by other countries, or on industry practice more generally.
On December 23, 2015, the German NCA issued a final decision prohibiting Booking.com's "narrow" price parity agreements with accommodations in Germany. The German NCA did not issue a fine, but has reserved its position regarding an order for disgorgement of profits. Booking.com is appealing the German NCA's decision. An Italian hotel association has appealed the Italian NCA's decision to accept the commitments by Booking.com.
A working group of 10 European NCAs (France, Germany, Belgium, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and Sweden) was established by the European Commission in December 2015 to monitor the effects of the narrow price parity clause in Europe. This working group (the "ECN Working Group") issued questionnaires during 2016 to online travel agencies, including Booking.com and Expedia, meta-search sites and hotels about the narrow price parity clause. On February 17, 2017 the ECN Working Group issued a statement that it would publish its report soon and that it had decided to keep the sector under review and re-assess the competitive situation in due course. Separately, the French NCA, which is conducting its own review of the effects of the narrow price parity clause, issued a report on February 9, 2017, stating that it has not ruled out the possibility of issuing an opinion at its own initiative if a change in competition requires it, and that it would continue to contribute actively to the ECN Working Group process.
We are unable to predict how our business maythese appeals and the remaining investigations in other countries will ultimately be affected.resolved, or whether further action in Europe will be taken as a result of the working group's findings. Possible outcomes include requiring Booking.com to amend or remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions and/or the imposition of fines.
On December 15, 2014,In August 2015, French legislation known as the French, Italian and Swedish national competition authorities, working in close cooperation with"Macron Law" became effective. Among other things, the European Commission, announced their intention to seek public feedback on commitments offered by Booking.com in connection with investigations of Booking.com's rate parity provisions in its contractual arrangements with accommodation providers. If the proposed commitments are accepted by the French, Italian and Swedish competition authorities, the investigations in those countries will be closed with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine. Under the terms of the proposed commitments, Booking.com would replace its existingMacron Law makes price parity agreements with accommodation providers - sometimes also referred to as "most favored nation" or "MFN" provisions - with "narrow" price parity agreements. Underillegal, including the "narrow" price parity agreement, an accommodation provider would still be requiredagreements agreed to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to a consumer directly, but it would no longer be required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to other on-line travel companies. If the commitments are accepted by the French NCA in April 2015. Legislation in Austria prohibiting "narrow" price parity agreements (including the narrow parity clause) became effective on December 31, 2016. Similar legislation was approved by the Italian Senate in June 2016 but not ultimately passed, and could be introduced again in 2017. A motion to prohibit the narrow price parity clause has also been proposed in Switzerland. It is not yet clear how the Macron Law and the Austrian legislation or the proposed Italian and Swedish competition authorities after they have beenSwiss legislation may affect our business in the long term in France, Austria, Italy and Switzerland, respectively.
Further, the European Commission published a communication on online platforms and the digital single market tested, Booking.comin May 2016 in which it stated that it will implementengage in targeted fact-finding to investigate concerns raised in a recent public consultation regarding potential unfair terms imposed by online platforms, including price parity clauses. The European Commission plans to report on its findings in the commitments within six monthsspring of their being accepted.2017. We are currently unable to predict the outcome of the market test of the proposed commitments offered in France, Italy and Sweden or the impact the proposed commitments in France, Italy and Swedenwhat, if any, effect this inquiry will
have on the on-going investigations in other European countries or how our business, may be affected by the proposed commitments if accepted. We note that the German competition authority has required Hotel Reservation Service to remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with hotels, and Hotel Reservation Service's initial appeal was denied. industry practices or online commerce more generally.
To the extent that regulatory authorities impose fines on us or require changes to our business practices or to those currently common to the industry, our business, competitive position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Negative publicity regarding any suchcompetition investigations could adversely affect our brands and therefore our market share and results of operations. Further, the Macron Law, the Italian and Austrian laws and any similar legislation enacted by other countries, and the decision by the German NCA to prohibit "narrow" price parity agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations, in particular if consumers use our services to shop for accommodation reservations but make their reservations directly with an accommodation provider.
Further,Competition-related investigations, legislation or issues could also give rise to private litigation. For example, Booking.com is involved in private litigation in Sweden related to its "narrow" price parity provisions. We are unable to predict how this litigation will be resolved, or whether it will impact Booking.com's business in Sweden.
In addition, as our business grows, we may increasingly become the target of suchcompetition investigations or be limited by anti-trust or competition laws. For example, our size and market share may negatively affect our ability to obtain regulatory approval of proposed acquisitions, or our ability to expand into complementary businesses or our latitude in dealing with travel service providers (such as by limiting our ability to provide discounts, rebates or incentives or to exercise contractual rights), any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations or ability to grow and compete.
Regulatory and legal requirements and uncertainties could harm our business.
The services we offer are subject to legal regulations (including laws, ordinances, rules and other requirements and regulations) of national and local governments and regulatory authorities around the world, many of which are evolving and subject to the possibility of new or revised interpretations. Our ability to provide our services is and will continue to be affected by such regulations. For example, laws and proposed legislation relating to data localization in some countries could adversely affect our ability to conduct business in those countries. The implementation of unfavorable regulations or unfavorable interpretations of existing regulations by judicial or regulatory bodies could require us to incur significant compliance costs, cause the development of the affected markets to become impractical and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Compliance with the laws and regulations of multiple jurisdictions increases our cost of doing business. These laws and regulations, which vary and sometimes conflict, include the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and local laws which also prohibit corrupt payments to governmental officials or third parties, data privacy requirements, labor relations laws, tax laws, anti-trust or competition laws, U.S., E.U. or U.N. sanctioned country or sanctioned persons mandates, and consumer protection laws. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and/or criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees and/or prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could result in prohibitions on our ability to offer our services in one or more countries, could delay or prevent potential acquisitions, and could also materially damage our reputation, our brands, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, our business and our operating results. Even if we comply with these laws and regulations, doing business in certain jurisdictions could harm our reputation and brands, which could adversely affect our results of operations or stock price. In addition, these restrictions may provide a competitive advantage to our competitors unless they are also subject to comparable restrictions. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate these risks and manage these difficulties. We are also subject to a variety of other regulatory and legal risks and challenges in managing an organization operating in various countries, including those related to:
regulatory changes or other government actions;
additional complexity to comply with regulations in multiple jurisdictions, as well as overlapping or inconsistent legal regimes, in particular with respect to tax, labor, consumer protection, digital content, advertising, promotions, privacy and anti-trust laws;
our ability to repatriate funds held by our non-U.S.international subsidiaries to the United States at favorable tax rates;
difficulties in transferring funds from or converting currencies in certain countries; and
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries.
Our business has grown substantially over the last several years and continues to expand into new geographic locations. In addition, we have made efforts and expect to make further efforts to integrate access to travel services across our various brands. These changes add complexity to legal and tax compliance, and our increased size and operating history may increase the likelihood that we will be subject to audits by tax authorities in various jurisdictions.
We face increased risks as the level of our debt increases.
24
"Cookie" lawsWe have a substantial amount of outstanding indebtedness and we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future, including through public or private offerings of debt securities. Our outstanding indebtedness and any additional indebtedness we incur may have significant consequences, which could negatively impactinclude:
requiring the waydedication of a portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures, share repurchases and acquisitions;
increased vulnerability to downturns in our business, to competitive pressures and to adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions;
decreased, or loss of, the ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, share repurchases or other general corporate purposes; and
decreased flexibility when planning for or reacting to changes in our business and industry.
Our ability to make payments of principal of and interest on our indebtedness depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our consolidated results of operations and financial condition, many of which are beyond our control. Further, we do business.
A "cookie" is a text file that is storedmay not have access to equity or debt markets or other sources of financing, or such financing may not be available to us on a user's web browser by a website. Cookiescommercially reasonable terms, to repay or refinance our debt as it comes due or, in the case of our convertible notes, upon conversion. If we are common tools used by thousands of websites, including ours,unable to generate sufficient cash flow from our U.S. operations in the future to service our debt, we may be required to, among other things, store or gather information (e.g., remember log-on details so a user does not have to re-enter them when revisiting a website), market to consumers and enhance the user experience on a website. Cookies are valuable tools for websites like ours to improve the customer experience and increase conversion on their websites.
The European Union's ePrivacy Directive requires member countries to adopt regulations governing the use of "cookies" by websites servicing consumers in the European Union. For example, on June 5, 2012, an amendmentrepatriate funds to the Dutch Telecommunications Act became effective. The amended act requires websites, including Booking.com, to provide Dutch users with clear and comprehensive information about the storage and use of certain cookies and obtain prior consent from the user before placing certain cookies on a user's web browser. To the extent any such regulations require "opt-in" consent before certain cookies can be placed on a user's web browser, our ability, in particular Booking.com's ability, to serve certain customers in the manner we currently do might be adversely affected and our ability to continue to improve and optimize performance on our websites might be impaired, either of which could negatively affect a consumer's experience using our services. As a result, these regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, market share and results of operations.United States at substantial tax cost.
Our stock price is highly volatile.
The market price of our common stock is highly volatile and is likely to continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors such as the following, some of which are beyond our control:
operating results that vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
quarterly variations in our operating results;
changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;
worldwide economic conditions in general and in Europe in particular;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, particularly between the U.S. Dollar and the Euro;
announcements of technological innovations or new services by us or our competitors;
changes in our capital structure;
changes in market valuations of other Internet or online service companies;
announcements by us or our competitors of price reductions, promotions, significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
loss of a major travel service provider participant, such as a hotel chain, rental car company or airline, from our services;
changes in the status of our intellectual property rights;
lack of success in the expansion of our business modelmodels geographically;
announcements by third parties of significant claims or initiation of litigation proceedings against us or adverse developments in pending proceedings;
occurrences of a significant security breach;
additions or departures of key personnel; and
trading volume fluctuations.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, including through the conversion of our convertible notes, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock by introducing a large number of sellers to the market. Given the volatility that exists for our shares, such sales could cause the market price of our common stock to decline significantly. In addition, fluctuations in our stock price and our price-to-earnings multiple may have made our stock attractive to momentum, hedge or day-trading investors who often shift funds into and out of stocks rapidly, exacerbating price fluctuations in either direction, particularly when viewed on a quarterly basis.
The trading prices of Internet company stocks in general, including ours, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. To the extent that the public's perception of the prospects of Internet or e-commerce companies is negative, our
stock price could decline, regardless of our results. Other broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Market fluctuations, as well as general political and economic conditions, such as a recession, or interest rate or currency rate fluctuations, political instability (e.g., "Brexit" or the recent coup attempt in Turkey) or a natural disaster or terrorist attack affecting a significant market for our business, such as Europe or the United States, could cause our stock price to decline. Negative market conditions could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital or the value of our stock for purposes of acquiring other companies or businesses.
We have, in the past, been a defendant in securities class action litigation. Securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. To the extent our stock price declines or is volatile, we may in the future be the target of additional litigation. This additional litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention and resources, either of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may"Cookie" laws could negatively impact the way we do business.
A "cookie" is a text file that is stored on a user's web browser by a website. Cookies are common tools used by thousands of websites, including ours, to, among other things, store or gather information (e.g., remember log-on details so a user does not be ablehave to keep up with rapid technological changes.re-enter them when revisiting a website), market to consumers and enhance the user experience on a website. Cookies are valuable tools for websites like ours to improve the customer experience and increase conversion on their websites.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, consolidation, frequent new service announcements, introductions and enhancements and changing consumer demands. We may not be ableEuropean Union's ePrivacy Directive requires member countries to keep up with these rapid changes. In addition, these market characteristics are heightened by the progress of technology adoption in various markets, including the continuing adoption of the Internet and online commerce in certain geographies and the emergence and growth ofadopt regulations governing the use of smart phones"cookies" by websites servicing consumers in the European Union. For example, a June 2012 amendment to the Dutch Telecommunications Act requires websites, including Booking.com, to provide Dutch users with clear and tablets for mobile e-commerce transactions, including throughcomprehensive information about the increasingstorage and use of mobile apps. Ascertain cookies and obtain prior consent from the user before placing certain cookies on a result,user's web browser. To the extent any such regulations require "opt-in" consent before certain cookies can be placed on a user's web browser, our future success will depend onability, in particular Booking.com's ability, to serve certain customers in the manner we currently do might be adversely affected and our ability to adaptcontinue to rapidly changing technologies, to adaptimprove and optimize performance on our websites might be impaired, either of which could negatively affect a consumer's experience using our services to evolving industry standards and to continually innovate and improve the performance, features and reliability of our services in response to competitive service offerings and the evolving demands of the marketplace. In particular, we believe that it will be increasingly important for us to effectively offer our services through mobile applications and mobile optimized websites on smart phones and tablets. Any failure by us to successfully develop and achieve customer adoption of our mobile applications and mobile optimized websites would likely have a material and adverse effect on our growth, market share, business and results of operations. We believe that increasingly ease-of-use, comprehensive functionality and the look and feel of our mobile apps and mobile optimized websites will be competitively critical as consumers obtain more of their travel and restaurant services through mobile devices. As a result, we intend to continue to spend significant resources maintaining, developing and enhancing our websites, including our mobile optimized websites, and our mobile apps and other technology.
In addition, the widespread adoption of new Internet, networking or telecommunications technologies or other technological changes could require us to incur substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure to those new technologies, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition. For example, KAYAK generates revenues, in part, by allowing consumers to compare search results that appear in additional "pop-under" windows. Changes in browser functionality, such as changes that either block or otherwise limit the use of "pop-under" windows, at times has had a negative impact on our revenues. Any failure to implement or adapt to new technologies in a timely manner or at all could adversely affect our ability to compete, increase our customer acquisition costs or otherwise adversely affect our business, and therefore adversely affect our brand, market share and results of operations.
We face risks related to our intellectual property.
We regard our intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on domain name, trademark, copyright and patent law, trade secret protection and confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, travel service providers, partners and others to protect our proprietary rights. We have filed various applications for protection of certain aspects of our intellectual property in the United States and other jurisdictions, and we currently hold a number of issued patents in multipleseveral jurisdictions. Further, in the future we may acquire additional patents or patent portfolios, which could require significant cash expenditures. However, we may choose not to patent or otherwise register some of our intellectual property and instead rely on trade secret or other means of protecting our intellectual property. We have licensed in the past, and may license in the future, certain of our proprietary rights, such as trademarks or copyrighted material, to third parties, and these licensees may take
actions that diminish the value of our proprietary rights or harm our reputation. In addition, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our services are made available online. We may be required to expend significant time and resources to prevent infringement or to enforce our intellectual property rights.
While weWe believe that our intellectual property rights, including our issued patents and pending patent applications, help to protect our business, there canbusiness. However, we may not be no assurance that:
a third party will not have or obtain one or more patents that can prevent us from practicing features of our business or that will require usable to pay for a license to use those features;
our operations do not or will not infringe valid, enforceable patents of third parties;
we can successfully defend our patents against challenges by third parties;
pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents;
competitorsintellectual property rights or potential competitors will not devise new methods of competing with us that are not covered by our patents or patent applications;
because of variations in the application of our business model to each of our services, our patents will be effective in preventing one or more third parties from utilizing a copycat business model to offer the same service in one or more categories;
new prior art willthey may not be discovered that may diminish the value of or invalidate an issued patent; or
legislative or judicial action will not directly or indirectly affect the scope and validity of any ofsufficient to effectively protect our patent rights, including the ability to obtain and enforce so called "business method patents".
business.
If we are not successful in protecting our intellectual property it could have a material adverse effect onor if our intellectual property is ineffective in protecting our business, our business, brands and results of operations.operations could be materially adversely affected.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, we have been subject to, and are currently subject to, legal proceedings and claims relating to the intellectual property rights of others, and we expect that third parties will continue to assert intellectual property claims, in particular patent claims, against us, particularly as we expand the complexity and scope of our business. For example, in February 2015, IBM sued us and certain of our subsidiaries asserting that we infringeinfringed certain IBM patents and claiming damages and injunctive relief. While we believe the suit to be without merit and intend to contestare contesting it, vigorously, litigation is uncertain and we may not be successful. We endeavor to defend our intellectual property rights diligently, but intellectual property litigation is extremely expensive and time consuming,time-consuming, and may divert managerial attention and resources from our business objectives. Successful infringement claims against us could result in a significant monetary liability or
prevent us from operating our business, or portions of our business. In addition, resolution of claims may require us to obtain licenses to use intellectual property rights belonging to third parties, which may be expensive to procure, or possibly to cease using those rights altogether. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations orand financial condition.
The success of our acquisition of OpenTable is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.
On July 24, 2014, we acquired OpenTable, a leading brand for booking online restaurant reservations. We believe that the online restaurant reservation business is complementary to our online travel businesses, and that both OpenTable and our travel businesses will benefit from the addition of OpenTable to The Priceline Group. As a result of our acquisition of OpenTable, we are subject to risks associated with OpenTable's business, many of which are the same risks that our other businesses face. Other risks include: OpenTable's ability to increase the number of restaurants and diners using its products and services and retain existing restaurants and diners; OpenTable's ability to expand internationally; competition both to provide reservation management services to restaurants and to attract diners to make reservations through OpenTable's websites and apps; OpenTable's ability to effectively and efficiently market to new restaurants and diners; and any risks that cause people to refrain from dining at restaurants, such as economic downturns, severe weather, outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, or threats of terrorist attacks.
OpenTable's post-acquisition strategy was premised on significant and rapid investment in international expansion and various other growth initiatives, resulting in near-term reduced earnings and profit margins but with the goal of achieving significantly increased revenues and profitability in the long term. As this strategy was achieving limited progress, in the third quarter of 2016 OpenTable modified its strategy. As a result, while OpenTable intends to continue to pursue and invest in international expansion and its other growth initiatives, it intends to do so in a more measured and deliberate manner. This change in strategy resulted in OpenTable updating its forecasted financial results to reflect (a) a material reduction in forecasted long-term financial results from these initiatives, partially offset by (b) improved earnings and profit margins in the near term as a result of the reduced investments. As previously disclosed, based on the updated forecast, we estimated a significant reduction in the fair value of the OpenTable business and, for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, recognized a non-deductible goodwill impairment charge of $940.7 million.
Future events and changing market conditions may lead us to again re-evaluate the assumptions reflected in the updated forecast, including key assumptions regarding OpenTable's expected growth rates and operating margins and the success and timing of its international expansion and other growth initiatives, as well as other key assumptions with respect to matters outside of our control, such as discount rates, currency exchange rates, market EBITDA comparables, and changes in accounting policies or practices, including proposed changes affecting measurement of goodwill and/or impairment testing methodology. If OpenTable does not achieve the results currently expected, if its investments, in particular its investments in its international expansion efforts and other growth initiatives, are not successful, or if any of the assumptions underlying our estimate of the value of the OpenTable business, including those mentioned above, prove to be incorrect, we may further refine our forecast for the OpenTable business and recognize an additional goodwill impairment and an impairment of intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
The value of our investments could decline, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These securities are predominantly classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Our portfolio includes fixed-income securities and equity securities of publicly traded companies, the values of which are subject to market price volatility. If such investments suffer market price declines, we may recognize in earnings the decline in the fair value of our investments below their cost basis when the decline is judged to be other than temporary. We have invested a significant amount in Ctrip convertible notes and ADSs. See Note 4 to our Consolidated Balance Sheets for more information regarding our investments in Ctrip securities. The value of these securities is subject to the risks associated with Ctrip's business, as well as any changes by the Chinese government in foreign investment laws or elevated scrutiny or regulation of foreign investments in Chinese companies. For example, because of foreign ownership restrictions applicable to its business, Ctrip is a Cayman Islands company operating in China through what is commonly referred to as a variable interest entity, or VIE, structure where it conducts part of its business through contractual relationships with affiliated Chinese entities. Although VIE structures are commonly used by Chinese Internet and e-commerce companies, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations to VIE structures, and it is possible that the PRC government may view the VIE structure as in violation of PRC law. VIE contractual relationships are not as effective in providing control over the affiliated Chinese companies as direct ownership, and Ctrip would have to rely on the PRC legal system to enforce those contracts in the event of a breach by one of these entities. Further, conflicts of interest could arise to the extent Ctrip's officers or directors are
also shareholders, officers or directors of the affiliated Chinese entities. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect Ctrip's business and therefore the value of our investment in Ctrip.
We also invest from time to time in private companies and these investments are generally accounted for under the cost method. Such investments are inherently risky in that such companies are typically at an early stage of development, may have no or limited revenues, may not be or ever become profitable, may not be able to secure additional funding or their technologies, services or products may not be successfully developed or introduced to the market. Further, our ability to liquidate any such investments is typically dependent on a liquidity event, such as a public offering or acquisition, as no public market exists for such securities. Valuations of privately-held companies are inherently complex and uncertain due to the lack of a liquid market for the company's securities. If we determine that any of our investments in such companies have experienced a decline in value, we may be required to record an other-than-temporary impairment. For example, during the first quarter of 2016, we recognized an other-than-temporary impairment of approximately $50 million related to our cost-method investment in Hotel Urbano, and in the second quarter of 2016, after discussions with Hotel Urbano's management, we recognized a further impairment of approximately $10 million to write-off the remainder of our investment in Hotel Urbano. In addition, during the second quarter of 2016 we recognized an impairment of approximately $3 million for an investment in another private company. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We could lose the full amount of any of our investments, and any impairment of our investments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Investment in new business strategies and acquisitions could disrupt our ongoing business and present risks not originally contemplated.
We have invested, and in the future may invest, in new business strategies and acquisitions. Such endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, greater than expected liabilities and expenses, inadequate return on capital, and unidentified issues not discovered in our investigations and evaluations of those strategies and acquisitions. We may decide to make minority investments, including through joint ventures, in which we have limited or no management or operational control. The controlling person in such a case may have business interests, strategies or goals that are inconsistent with ours, and decisions of the company or venture in which we invested may result in harm to our reputation or adversely affect the value of our investment. A substantial portion of our goodwill and intangible assets were acquired in acquisitions. If we determine that any of the goodwill and intangible assets, or any goodwill or intangible assets acquired in future transactions, experiences a decline in value, we may be required to record an other-than-temporary impairment, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Further, we may issue shares of our common stock in these transactions, which could result in dilution to our stockholders.
Our use of "open source" software could adversely affect our ability to protect our proprietary software and subject us to possible litigation.
We use open source software in connection with our software development. From time to time, companies that use open source software have faced claims challenging the use of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. We could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software, or claiming non-compliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source licenses require users who distribute software containing open source to make available all or part of such software, which in some circumstances could include valuable proprietary code of the user. While we monitor our use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would require us to disclose our proprietary source code or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could inadvertently occur, in part because open source license terms are often ambiguous. Any requirement to disclose our proprietary source code or pay damages for breach of contract could be harmful to our business, results of operations or financial condition, and could help our competitors develop services that are similar to or better than ours.
Our business is exposed to risks associated with processing credit card transactions.
Our results have been negatively impacted by purchases made using fraudulent credit cards. Because we act asfacilitate the merchantprocessing of recordcustomer credit cards in many of our transactions, including a majority of our priceline.com, transactions as well as those of agoda.com and rentalcars.com,Rentalcars.com transactions, we may be held liable for accepting fraudulent credit cards on our websites as well as other payment disputes with our customers. Additionally, we may be held liable for accepting fraudulent credit cards in certain retail transactions when we do not act as merchantfacilitate the processing of record.customer credit cards. Accordingly, we calculate and record an allowance for the resulting credit cardcustomer chargebacks. If we are unable to combat the use of fraudulent credit cards on our websites, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
In addition, in the event that one of our major travel service providers voluntarily or involuntarily declares bankruptcy, we could experience an increase in credit card chargebacks from customers with travel reservations with such travel service provider. For example, airlines that participate in our services and declare bankruptcy or cease operations may be unable or unwilling to honor tickets sold for their flights. Our policy in such event is to direct customers seeking a refund or exchange to the airline, and not to provide a remedy ourselves. Because we are the merchant-of-record onprocess sales ofName Your Own Price® and Express Deals® airline tickets to our customers, however,on a merchant basis, we could experience a significant increase in demands for refunds or credit card chargebacks from customers, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For example,We have in April 2008, Aloha Airlines and ATA Airlines each ceased operations, and wethe past experienced an increase in credit card chargebacks from customers with tickets on those airlines. Agoda.com and rentalcars.comairlines that ceased operations. We process credit card transactions and operate in numerous currencies. Credit card and other payment processing costs are typically higher for foreign currency transactions and in instances where cancellations occur.
The success of our acquisition of OpenTable is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.
On July 24, 2014, we acquired OpenTable, a leading brand for booking online restaurant reservations. We believe that the online restaurant reservation business is complementary to our online travel businesses, and that both OpenTable and our travel businesses will benefit from adding OpenTable to The Priceline Group. As a result of our acquisition of OpenTable, we are subject to risks associated with OpenTable's business, many of which are the same risks that our other businesses face. Other risks include: OpenTable's ability to increase the number of restaurants and diners using its products and services and retain existing restaurants and diners; competition both to provide reservation management services to restaurants and to attract diners to make reservations through OpenTable's websites and apps; OpenTable's ability to expand internationally; OpenTable's ability to effectively and efficiently market to new restaurants and diners; and any risks that cause people to refrain from dining at restaurants, such as economic downturns, severe weather, outbreaks of pandemic or contagious diseases, or threats of terrorist attacks. If OpenTable is unsuccessful in profitably growing its global online restaurant reservation business or it experiences a significant reduction in revenues due to factors such as competition, increased capital expenditures or investments we make in growing OpenTable's business, in particular internationally, or any other reason, the value of our investment in OpenTable may be adversely affected and we may incur an impairment charge related to goodwill.
Investment in new business strategies and acquisitions could disrupt our ongoing business and present risks not originally contemplated.
We have invested, and in the future may invest, in new business strategies and acquisitions. Such endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, greater than expected liabilities and expenses, inadequate return on capital, and unidentified issues not discovered in our investigations and evaluations of those strategies and acquisitions. We may decide to make minority investments, including through joint ventures, in which we have limited or no management or operational control. The controlling person in such a case may have business interests, strategies or goals that are inconsistent with ours, and decisions of the company or venture in which we invested may result in harm to our reputation or adversely affect the value of our investment. Further, we may issue shares of our common stock in these transactions, which could result in dilution to our stockholders.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters and the headquarters of our priceline.com business are located in Norwalk, Connecticut, United States of America, where we lease approximately 70,00090,000 square feet of office space. Our Booking.com business is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, where weWe lease approximately 202,000258,000 square feet of office space;space in Amsterdam, Netherlands for the headquarters of our Booking.com business; our agoda.com business has significant support operations in Bangkok, Thailand, where we lease approximately 118,000140,000 square feet of office space; our KAYAK business is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America, where we lease approximately 18,000 square feet of office space; our OpenTable business is headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States of America, where we lease approximately 51,00060,000 square feet of office space; and our rentalcars.comRentalcars.com business is headquartered in Manchester, England, where we lease approximately 63,00045,000 square feet of office space. We lease additional office space to support our operations in various locations around the world, including hosting and data center facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, andGermany, Singapore, Hong Kong and China and sales and support facilities in numerous locations. WeOther than the office building in the Netherlands that is currently under construction (see the section "Building Construction" withinNote 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for more details, which is incorporated into this Item 2 by reference thereto), we do not own any real estate as of December 31, 2014.2016.
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current requirements, and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any further expansion of corporate operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Competition Reviews
In July 2012, the OfficeA description of Fair Trading (the "OFT"), the predecessor competition authority in the United Kingdommaterial legal proceedings to the Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA"), issued a "Statement of Objections" ("SO") to Booking.com, which set out the OFT's preliminary views on why it believed Booking.com and others in the online hotel reservation industry were allegedly in breach of E.U. and U.K. competition law. The SO alleged, among other things, that there were agreements or concerted practices between hotels and Booking.com and between hotels and at least one other OTC that restricted Booking.com's (and the other OTC's) ability to discount hotel room reservations, which the OFT alleged was a form of resale price maintenance. We dispute the allegations in the SO.
On January 31, 2014, the OFT announced that it had accepted commitments offered by Booking.com, as well as Expedia and Intercontinental Hotel Group, (the "Commitments") to close the investigation on the basis that they address the OFT's competition concerns. The OFT closed its investigation with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine.
The Commitments provide, among other things, that hotels will continue to be able to set retail prices for hotel room reservations on all OTC websites, such as Booking.com. Under the Commitments, OTCs, such as Booking.com, have the flexibility to discount a hotel's retail price, but only to members of closed groups, a concept that is defined in the Commitments, who have previously made a reservation through the OTC. The discount may be up to Booking.com's commission. In addition, the Commitments provide that Booking.com will not require rate parity from hotels in relation to discounted rates that are provided by other OTCs or hotels to members of their closed groups, provided the discounted rate is not made public. The Commitments apply to bookings by European Economic Area residents at U.K. hotels.
On March 31, 2014, Skyscanner, a meta-search site based in the United Kingdom, filed an appeal in the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") against the OFT's decision to accept the Commitments. Booking.com intervened in support of the CMA in the CAT. In its decision dated September 26, 2014, the CAT found that the CMA was wrong to reject Skyscanner's arguments about the negative impact of the Commitments on its business and price transparency generally without properly exploring these arguments. The CAT's decision vacates the CMA's Commitments decision and remits the matter to the CMA for reconsideration in accordance with the CAT's ruling. The CMA did not appeal the CAT's decision. It is uncertain what action the CMA will take in response to the CAT's ruling, which could involve re-opening, closing or suspending the investigation.
Investigations have also been opened by the national competition authorities in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Sweden, Ireland, Denmark and Switzerland that focus on Booking.com's rate parity clause in its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions. Competition related inquiries have also been received from the competition authority in China. We are in ongoing discussions with the relevant regulatory authorities regarding their concerns. We are currently unable to predict the outcome of these investigations or how our business may be affected. Possible outcomes include requiring Booking.com to amend or remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions and/or the imposition of fines.
On December 15, 2014, the French, Italian and Swedish national competition authorities, working in close cooperation with the European Commission, announced their intention to seek public feedback on commitments offered by Booking.com in connection with investigations of Booking.com's rate parity provisions in its contractual arrangements with accommodation providers. If the proposed commitments are accepted by the French, Italian and Swedish competition authorities, the investigations in those countries will be closed with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine. Under the terms of the proposed commitments, Booking.com would replace its existing price parity agreements with accommodation providers - sometimes also referred to as "most favored nation" or "MFN" provisions - with "narrow" price parity agreements. Under the "narrow" price parity agreement, an accommodation provider would still be required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to a consumer directly, but it would no longer be required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to other on-line travel companies. If the commitments are accepted by the French, Italian and Swedish competition authorities after they have been market tested, Booking.com will implement the commitments within six months of their being accepted. We are currently unable to predict the outcome of the market test of the proposed commitments offered in France, Italy and Sweden or the impact the proposed commitments in France, Italy and Sweden will have on the on-going investigations in other European countries or how our business may be affected by the proposed commitments if accepted. We note that the German competition authority has required Hotel Reservation Service to remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with hotels, and Hotel Reservation Service's initial appeal was denied. To the extent that
regulatory authorities require changes to our business practices or to those currently common to the industry, our business, competitive position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Negative publicity regarding any such investigations could adversely affect our brands and therefore our market share and results of operations.
Lawsuits Alleging Antitrust Violations
On August 20, 2012, one complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased hotel room reservations from certain hotels (the "Hotel Defendants") through certain OTC defendants, including us. The initial complaint, Turik v. Expedia, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-4365, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleged that the Hotel Defendants and the OTC defendants violated U.S. federal and state laws by entering into a conspiracy to enforce a minimum resale price maintenance scheme pursuant to which putative class members paid inflated prices for hotel room reservations that they purchased through the OTC defendants. Thirty-one other complaints containing similar allegations were filed in a number of federal jurisdictions across the country. Plaintiffs in these actions sought treble damages and injunctive relief.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated all of the pending cases under 28 U.S.C. §1407 before Judge Boyle in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On May 1, 2013, an amended consolidated complaint was filed.
On February 18, 2014, Judge Boyle dismissed the amended consolidated complaint without prejudice. On October 27, 2014 the court denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a proposed Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, and on October 28, 2014 the court issued a final judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. The time to appeal the court's October 27, 2014 decision has expired and the matter is closed.
Litigation Related to Travel Transaction Taxes
We and certain third-party online travel companies ("OTCs") are currently involved in approximately forty lawsuits, including certified and putative class actions, brought by or against U.S. states, cities and counties over issues involving the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). Our subsidiaries priceline.com LLC, Lowestfare.com LLC and Travelweb LLC are named in some but not all of these cases. Generally, the complaints allege, among other things, that the OTCs violated each jurisdiction's respective relevant travel transaction tax ordinance with respect to the charge and remittance of amounts to cover taxes under each law. The complaints typically seek compensatory damages, disgorgement, penalties available by law, attorneys' fees and other relief. In addition, approximately seventy-nine municipalities or counties, and at least eleven states, have initiated audit proceedings (including proceedings initiated by more than forty municipalities in California, which have been inactive for several years), issued proposed tax assessments or started inquiries relating to the payment of travel transaction taxes. Additional state and local jurisdictions are likely to assert that we are subject to travel transaction taxes and could seek to collect such taxes, retroactively and/or prospectively.
With respect to the principal claims in these matters, we believe that the laws at issue do not apply to the services we provide, namely the facilitation of travel reservations, and, therefore, that we do not owe the taxes that are claimed to be owed. Rather, we believe that the laws at issue generally impose travel transaction taxes on entities that own, operate or control hotels (or similar businesses) or furnish or provide hotel rooms or similar accommodations or other travel services. In addition, in many of these matters, the taxing jurisdictions have asserted claims for "conversion" - essentially, that we have collected a tax and wrongfully "pocketed" those tax dollars - a claim that we believe is without basis and have vigorously contested. The taxing jurisdictions that are currently involved in litigation and other proceedings with us, and that may be involved in future proceedings, have asserted contrary positions and will likely continue to do so. From time to time, we have found it expedient to settle, and may in the future agree to settle, claims pending in these matters without conceding that the claims at issue are meritorious or that the claimed taxes are in fact due to be paid.
In connection with some of these tax audits and assessments, we may be required to pay any assessed taxes, which amounts may be substantial, prior to being allowed to contest the assessments and the applicability of the laws in judicial proceedings. This requirement is commonly referred to as "pay to play" or "pay first." For example, the City and County of San Francisco assessed the Company approximately $3.4 million (an amount that includes interest and penalties) relating to hotel occupancy taxes, which the Company paid in July 2009, and issued a second assessment totaling approximately $2.7 million, which the Company paid in January 2013. Payment of these amounts, if any, is not an admission that we believe we are subject to such taxes. In the San Francisco action, for example, the court ruled in February 2013 that we and OTCs do not owe transient accommodations tax to the city and ordered the city to refund the amount paid in July 2009; we also are seeking a refund of the amount paid in January 2013. San Francisco has appealed the court's ruling and has not refunded the amount paid
in July 2009 pending resolution of the appeal. The matter has been stayed while the appeal in another case with the City of San Diego is pending before the California Supreme Court.
Litigation is subject to uncertainty and there could be adverse developments in these pending or future cases and proceedings. For example, in January 2013, the Tax Appeal Court for the State of Hawaii held that we and other OTCs are not liable for the State's transient accommodations tax, but held that the OTCs, including us, are liable for the State's general excise tax on the full amount the OTC collects from the customer for a hotel room reservation, without any offset for amounts passed through to the hotel. We recorded an accrual for travel transaction taxes (including estimated interest and penalties), with a corresponding charge to cost of revenues, of approximately $16.5 million in December 2012 and approximately $18.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily related to this ruling. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, we paid approximately $20.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the State of Hawaii related to this ruling. We have filed an appeal now pending before the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Other adverse rulings include a decision in September 2012, in which the Superior Court in the District of Columbia granted summary judgment in favor of the District and against the OTCs ruling that tax is due on the OTCs' margin and service fees, which we are appealing. As a result, we increased our accrual for travel transaction taxes (including estimated interest), with a corresponding charge to cost of revenues, by approximately $4.8 millionparty, and updates thereto, is included in September 2012 and by approximately $5.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2013. Also, in July 2013, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, ruled that we and the other OTCs are liable for tax and other obligations under the Chicago Hotel Accommodations Tax. In July 2014, we resolved all claims in this case through settlement and the claims against us were dismissed on September 3, 2014. In addition, in October 2009, a jury in a San Antonio class action found that we and the other OTCs that are defendants in the lawsuit "control" hotels for purposes of the local hotel occupancy tax ordinances at issue and are, therefore, subject to the requirements of those ordinances. We intend to vigorously appeal the trial court's judgment when it becomes final.
An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending litigation may encourage the commencement of additional litigation, audit proceedings or other regulatory inquiries and also could result in substantial liabilities for past and/or future bookings, including, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorney fees and costs. There have been, and will continue to be, substantial ongoing costs, which may include "pay first" payments, associated with defending our position in pending and any future cases or proceedings. An adverse outcome in one or more of these unresolved proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business and could be materialNote 14 to our results of operations or cash flowConsolidated Financial Statements included in any given operating period. However, we believe that even if we were to suffer adverse determinations in the near term in more of the pending proceedings than currently anticipated, given results to date it would not have a material impactAnnual Report on our liquidity because of our available cash.
To the extent that any tax authority succeeds in asserting that our services are subject to travel transaction taxes and that we have a tax collection responsibility for those taxes, or we determine that we have such a responsibility, with respect to future transactions we may collect any such additional tax obligation from our customers, which would have the effect of increasing the cost of travel reservations to our customers and, consequently, could make our travel reservation services less competitive (as compared to the services of other OTCs or travel service providers) and reduce our travel reservation transactions; alternatively, we could choose to reduce the compensation for our services. Either action could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In many of the judicial and other proceedings initiated to date, the taxing jurisdictions seek not only historical taxes that are claimed to be owed on our gross profit, but also, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorney fees and costs. Therefore, any liability associated with travel transaction tax matters is not constrained to our liability for tax owed on its historical gross profit, but may also include, among other things, penalties, interest and attorneys' fees. To date, the majority of the taxing jurisdictions in which we facilitate hotel reservations have not asserted that these taxes are due and payable. With respect to taxing jurisdictions that have not initiated proceedings to date, it is possible that they will do so in the future or that they will seek to amend their tax statutes and seek to collect taxes from us only on a prospective basis.
Accrual for Travel Transaction Taxes
As a result of this litigation and other attempts by jurisdictions to levy similar taxes, we have established an accrual (including estimated interest and penalties)Form 10-K for the potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes in the amount of approximately $52 million at year Ended December 31, 2014 compared to approximately $55 million at December 31, 2013. Our legal expenses for these matters are expensed as incurred2016, and are not reflected in the amount accrued. The actual cost may be less or greater, potentially significantly, than the liabilities recorded. An estimate for a reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued cannot be reasonably made.
We intend to vigorously defend against the claims in all of the proceedings described below.
Statewide Class Actions and Putative Class Actions
Such actions include:
City of Los Angeles, California v. Hotels.com, Inc., et al. (California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; filed in December 2004); (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in March 2014);
City of San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al. (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; filed in May 2006);
Pine Bluff Advertising and Promotion Commission, Jefferson County, Arkansas, et al. v. Hotels.com, LP, et al. (Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Arkansas; filed in September 2009); (Arkansas Supreme Court; appeal filed in March 2013);
County of Lawrence, Pennsylvania v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al. (Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County, Pennsylvania; filed Nov. 2009); (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania; appeal filed in November 2010);
City of Columbia, South Carolina, et al. v. Hotelguides.com, Inc. et al. (Court of Common Pleas, Ninth Judicial Circuit, County of Charleston; filed in July 2013); and
City of Charleston, et al. v. Hotelguides.com, Inc. et al. (Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South Carolina; filed January 2014).
Actions Filed on Behalf of Individual Cities, Counties and States
Such actions include:
City of San Diego, California v. Hotels.com L.P., et al. (California Superior Court, San Diego County; filed in September 2006) (Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County) (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in August 2012); (California Supreme Court; petition for review granted in July 2014);
City of Atlanta, Georgia v. Hotels.com L.P., et al. (Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia; filed in March 2006); (Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia; appeal filed in January 2007); (Georgia Supreme Court; further appeal filed in December 2007; petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition filed in December 2012; further appeal filed in November 2013 but transferred to Georgia Court of Appeals in July 2014);
Leon County, et al. v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Second Judicial Circuit Court for Leon County, Florida; filed November 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; appeal filed in May 2012); (Florida Supreme Court; jurisdiction accepted in September 2013);
Leon County v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (Second Judicial Circuit Court for Leon County, Florida; filed in December 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; appeal filed in October 2012); (Florida Supreme Court; notice to invoke jurisdiction filed in October 2013);
Montana Department of Revenue v. Priceline.com, Inc., et al. (First Judicial District Court of Lewis and Clark County, Montana; filed in November 2010); (Montana Supreme Court; appeal filed in May 2014);
District of Columbia v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Superior Court of District of Columbia; filed in March 2011); (District of Columbia Court of Appeals; appeal filed in March 2014);
Volusia County, et al. v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Circuit Court for Volusia County, Florida; filed in April 2011);
Town of Breckenridge, Colorado v. Colorado Travel Company, LLC, et al. (District Court for Summit County, Colorado; filed in July 2011);
County of Nassau v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Supreme Court of Nassau County, New York; filed in September 2011); (Appellate Division, Second Department; appeal filed in April 2013);
State of Mississippi v. Priceline.com Inc., et al., (Chancery Court of Hinds County, Mississippi; filed in January 2012);
Fargo v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (District Court for the County of Cass; filed in February 2013)
Village of Bedford Park, et al. v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; filed in July 2013);
Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Expedia Inc., et al. (Franklin Circuit Court, Kentucky; filed in July 2013);
State of New Hampshire v. priceline.com Inc., et al. (Merrimack Superior Court; filed in October 2013);
Puerto Rico Tourism Company v. Priceline.com Incorporated, et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico; filed in April 2014); and
City of Phoenix, et al. v. Priceline.com Inc., et al. (Arizona Tax Court; filed in August 2014).
Judicial Actions Relating to Assessments Issued by Individual Cities, Counties and States
We may seek judicial review of assessments issued by an individual city or county. Currently pending actions seeking such a review include:
Priceline.com, Inc., et al. v. Broward County, Florida (Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County, Florida; filed in January 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; filed in February 2013); (Florida Supreme Court; notice to invoke jurisdiction filed in February 2014);
Priceline.com, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (Indiana Tax Court; filed in March 2009);
Priceline.com, Inc., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. (California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles; filed in June 2009); (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in December 2013); Priceline.com, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. (California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles; filed in November 2013);
Priceline.com, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, Florida, et al. (Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court for Miami-Dade, County, Florida; filed in December 2009);
priceline.com Incorporated, et al. v. Osceola County, Florida, et al. (Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County, Florida; filed in January 2011);
In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in March 2011) (Hawaii Supreme Court; appeal transferred in December 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii, filed in July 2012) (Hawaii Supreme Court; appeal transferred in December 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii, filed in June 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in January 2014); In the Matter of the Appeal of priceline.com Incorporated (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in August 2014);
Expedia, Inc. et al. v. City of Portland (Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Oregon, filed in February 2012);
Expedia, Inc., et al. v. City and County of Denver, et al. (District Court for Denver County, Colorado, filed in March 2012); (Colorado Court of Appeal; appeal filed in April 2013); (Colorado Supreme Court; petition for review filed in August 2014); and
Expedia, Inc., et al. v. Oregon Department of Revenue (Oregon Tax Court; filed in September 2013).
Administrative Proceedings and Other Possible Actions
At various times, we have also received inquiries or proposed tax assessments from municipalities and other taxing jurisdictions relating to our charges and remittance of amounts to cover state and local travel transaction taxes. Among others, the City of Paradise Valley, Arizona; fifteen cities (and one county) in Colorado; Arlington, Texas; Lake County, Indiana; and state tax officials from Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin have begun formal or informal administrative procedures or stated that they may assert claims against us relating to allegedly unpaid state or local travel transaction taxes. Between 2008 and 2010, we received audit notices from more than forty cities in the state of California. The audit proceedings in those cities have not been active but have not been formally closed. We have also been contacted for audit by five counties in the state of Utah.
Patent Infringement
On February 9, 2015, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against us and our subsidiaries KAYAK Software Corporation, OpenTable, Inc. and priceline.com LLC (the "Subject Companies"). In the complaint, IBM alleges that the Subject Companies have infringed and continue to willfully infringe certain IBM patents that IBM claims relate to the presentation of applications and advertising in an interactive service, preserving state information in online transactions and single sign-on processes in a computing environment and seeks unspecified damages (including a request that the amount of compensatory damages be trebled), injunctive relief and costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. We believe the claims to be without merit and intend to contest them vigorously.
Other
We intend to defend vigorously against the claims in all of the proceedings described inis incorporated into this Item 3. We have accrued for certain legal contingencies where it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Except as disclosed, such amounts accrued are not material to our consolidated balance sheets and provisions recorded have not been material to our consolidated results of operations or cash flows. We are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss.
From time to time, we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third party intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources, divert management's attention from our business objectives and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.3 by reference thereto.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "PCLN." The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market:
| | | 2014 | | High | | Low | |
| 2016 | | | High | | Low |
| | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | | $ | 1,378.96 |
| | $ | 1,103.90 |
| | $ | 1,361.63 |
| | $ | 954.02 |
|
| Second Quarter | | 1,292.66 |
| | 1,087.26 |
| | 1,394.00 |
| | 1,148.06 |
|
| Third Quarter | | 1,329.90 |
| | 1,139.27 |
| | 1,481.78 |
| | 1,245.51 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | | 1,229.00 |
| | 1,017.28 |
| | 1,600.93 |
| | 1,422.19 |
|
| | | 2013 | | High | | Low | |
| 2015 | | | High | | Low |
| | | | | | | | | |
| First Quarter | | $ | 728.70 |
| | $ | 627.67 |
| | $ | 1,264.00 |
| | $ | 990.69 |
|
| Second Quarter | | 847.33 |
| | 677.72 |
| | 1,280.97 |
| | 1,103.45 |
|
| Third Quarter | | 1,019.95 |
| | 831.11 |
| | 1,395.00 |
| | 1,115.77 |
|
| Fourth Quarter | | 1,198.75 |
| | 972.40 |
| | 1,476.52 |
| | 1,212.00 |
|
Holders
As of February 11, 2015,21, 2017, there were approximately 239203 stockholders of record of The Priceline Group Inc.'s common stock.
Dividend Policy
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception and do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of our business.
Performance Measurement Comparison
The following graph shows the total stockholder return through December 31, 20142016 of an investment of $100 in cash on December 31, 20092011 for The Priceline Group Inc. common stock and an investment of $100 in cash on December 31, 20092011 for (i) the NASDAQ Composite Index, (ii) the Standard and Poor's 500 Index and (iii) the Research Data Group ("RDG") Internet Composite Index. The RDG Internet Composite Index is an index of stocks representing the Internet industry, including Internet software and service companies and e-commerce companies. Historic stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. All values assume reinvestment of the full amount of all dividends and are calculated as of the last day of each month:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Measurement Point December 31 | | The Priceline Group Inc. | | NASDAQ Composite Index | | S&P 500 Index | | RDG Internet Composite |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2011 | | 100.00 |
| | 100.00 |
| | 100.00 |
| | 100.00 |
|
| 2012 | | 132.64 |
| | 116.41 |
| | 116.00 |
| | 119.34 |
|
| 2013 | | 248.53 |
| | 165.47 |
| | 153.58 |
| | 195.83 |
|
| 2014 | | 243.79 |
| | 188.69 |
| | 174.60 |
| | 192.42 |
|
| 2015 | | 272.59 |
| | 200.32 |
| | 177.01 |
| | 264.96 |
|
| 2016 | | 313.45 |
| | 216.54 |
| | 198.18 |
| | 277.56 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Measurement Point December 31 | | The Priceline Group Inc. | | NASDAQ Composite Index | | S&P 500 Index | | RDG Internet Composite |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2009 | | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 100.00 |
|
| 2010 | | 182.94 |
| | 117.61 |
| | 115.06 |
| | 117.87 |
|
| 2011 | | 214.14 |
| | 118.70 |
| | 117.49 |
| | 119.73 |
|
| 2012 | | 284.05 |
| | 139.00 |
| | 136.30 |
| | 143.58 |
|
| 2013 | | 532.21 |
| | 196.83 |
| | 180.44 |
| | 234.21 |
|
| 2014 | | 522.05 |
| | 223.74 |
| | 205.14 |
| | 229.15 |
|
Sales of Unregistered Securities
Between October 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014, we issued 599 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $250,000 principal amount of our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015. The conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture, which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election. The issuances of the shares were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act") pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table sets forth information relating to repurchases of our equity securities during the three months ended December 31, 2014:2016:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| October 1, 2014 — | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 382 |
| | (1) |
| October 31, 2014 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 507,236,207 |
| | (2) |
| | | 646 |
| (3) | $ | 1,155.13 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | (3) |
| | | — |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| November 1, 2014 — | | — |
| (1) | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | (1) |
| November 30, 2014 | | 7,514 |
| (2) | 1,149.61 |
| | 7,514 |
| | $ | 498,598,401 |
| | (2) |
| | | 3,574 |
| (3) | $ | 1,154.81 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | (3) |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| December 1, 2014 — | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | |
| December 31, 2014 | | 431,383 |
| (2) | 1,139.04 |
| | 431,383 |
| | $ | 7,237,309 |
| | (2) |
| | | — |
| | — |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | (3) |
| Total | | 443,117 |
| | $ | 1,139.37 |
| | 438,897 |
| | $ | 7,237,309 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| October 1, 2016 — | | 8,964 |
| (1) | $ | 1,441.09 |
| | 8,964 |
| | $ | 2,389,097,571 |
| | (1) |
| October 31, 2016 | | 342 |
| (2) | $ | 1,474.99 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | |
| | | — |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| November 1, 2016 — | | 39,030 |
| (1) | $ | 1,500.69 |
| | 39,030 |
| | $ | 2,330,525,514 |
| | (1) |
| November 30, 2016 | | 2,237 |
| (2) | $ | 1,545.39 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | |
| December 1, 2016 — | | 128,189 |
| (1) | $ | 1,498.12 |
| | 128,189 |
| | $ | 2,138,483,581 |
| | (1) |
| December 31, 2016 | | 2,394 |
| (2) | $ | 1,484.35 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | |
| Total | | 181,156 |
| | $ | 1,496.21 |
| | 176,183 |
| | $ | 2,138,483,581 |
| | |
_____________________________
| |
| (1) | Pursuant to a stock repurchase program announced on March 4, 2010,February 17, 2016, whereby the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $500,000,000$3,000,000,000 of its common stock. |
| |
| (2) | Pursuant to a stock repurchase program announced on May 29, 2013, whereby the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $1,000,000,000 of its common stock. |
| |
(3) | Pursuant to a general authorization, not publicly announced, whereby the Company is authorized to repurchase shares of its common stock to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data presented below is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes of the Company, and should be read in connection with those statements, some of which are included herein. Selected financial data reflects data related to rentalcars.comKAYAK from its acquisition date of May 2010, KAYAK from its acquisition date of May21, 2013 and OpenTable from its acquisition date of July 24, 2014. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future results and should be read in conjunction with Part II Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 8,441,971 |
| | $ | 6,793,306 |
| | $ | 5,260,956 |
| | $ | 4,355,610 |
| | $ | 3,084,905 |
| $ | 10,743,006 |
| | $ | 9,223,987 |
| | $ | 8,441,971 |
| | $ | 6,793,306 |
| | $ | 5,260,956 |
|
| Cost of revenues | 857,841 |
| | 1,077,420 |
| | 1,177,275 |
| | 1,275,730 |
| | 1,175,934 |
| 428,314 |
| | 632,180 |
| | 857,841 |
| | 1,077,420 |
| | 1,177,275 |
|
| Gross profit | 7,584,130 |
| | 5,715,886 |
| | 4,083,681 |
| | 3,079,880 |
| | 1,908,971 |
| 10,314,692 |
| | 8,591,807 |
| | 7,584,130 |
| | 5,715,886 |
| | 4,083,681 |
|
Total operating expenses | 4,510,818 |
| | 3,303,472 |
| | 2,253,888 |
| | 1,680,958 |
| | 1,122,174 |
| 7,408,379 |
| | 5,332,900 |
| | 4,510,818 |
| | 3,303,472 |
| | 2,253,888 |
|
Operating income | 3,073,312 |
| | 2,412,414 |
| | 1,829,793 |
| | 1,398,922 |
| | 786,797 |
| 2,906,313 |
| | 3,258,907 |
| | 3,073,312 |
| | 2,412,414 |
| | 1,829,793 |
|
| Total other expense | 83,864 |
| | 115,877 |
| | 67,924 |
| | 31,128 |
| | 40,514 |
| 193,075 |
| | 130,587 |
| | 83,864 |
| | 115,877 |
| | 67,924 |
|
| Income tax expense | 567,695 |
| | 403,739 |
| | 337,832 |
| | 308,663 |
| | 218,141 |
| 578,251 |
| | 576,960 |
| | 567,695 |
| | 403,739 |
| | 337,832 |
|
Net income | 2,421,753 |
| | 1,892,798 |
| | 1,424,037 |
| | 1,059,131 |
| | 528,142 |
| 2,134,987 |
| | 2,551,360 |
| | 2,421,753 |
| | 1,892,798 |
| | 1,424,037 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(1)(2) | — |
| | 135 |
| | 4,471 |
| | 2,760 |
| | 601 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 135 |
| | 4,471 |
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders | 2,421,753 |
| | 1,892,663 |
| | 1,419,566 |
| | 1,056,371 |
| | 527,541 |
| 2,134,987 |
| | 2,551,360 |
| | 2,421,753 |
| | 1,892,663 |
| | 1,419,566 |
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | 46.30 |
| | 37.17 |
| | 28.48 |
| | 21.27 |
| | 11.00 |
| 43.14 |
| | 50.09 |
| | 46.30 |
| | 37.17 |
| | 28.48 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted share | 45.67 |
| | 36.11 |
| | 27.66 |
| | 20.63 |
| | 10.35 |
| |
Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share (1) | | 42.65 |
| | 49.45 |
| | 45.67 |
| | 36.11 |
| | 27.66 |
|
| Total assets | 14,940,563 |
| | 10,444,460 |
| | 6,569,742 |
| | 3,970,671 |
| | 2,905,953 |
| 19,838,973 |
| | 17,420,575 |
| | 14,770,977 |
| | 10,428,543 |
| | 6,547,771 |
|
Long-term obligations, redeemable noncontrolling interests(2)(3) | 5,031,073 |
| | 2,304,917 |
| | 1,731,385 |
| | 788,218 |
| | 621,624 |
| 8,127,895 |
| | 7,185,796 |
| | 4,862,730 |
| | 2,289,039 |
| | 1,710,194 |
|
| Total liabilities | 6,373,540 |
| | 3,526,198 |
| | 2,457,825 |
| | 1,191,971 |
| | 1,046,828 |
| 9,990,293 |
| | 8,625,106 |
| | 6,203,954 |
| | 3,510,281 |
| | 2,435,854 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity | 8,566,694 |
| | 6,909,729 |
| | 3,896,975 |
| | 2,574,295 |
| | 1,813,336 |
| 9,820,142 |
| | 8,795,469 |
| | 8,566,694 |
| | 6,909,729 |
| | 3,896,975 |
|
_____________________________
| |
(1) | tIncludes a non-cash charge related to an impairment of OpenTable goodwill of $940.7 million, which is not tax deductible, for the year ended December 31, 2016 (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The goodwill impairment charge reduced the 2016 basic and diluted net income per share by $19.01 and $18.79, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Redeemable noncontrolling interests beginning in 2010 relates to the Company's purchase of rentalcars.comRentalcars.com in May 2010. In April 2011, in connection with the exercise of certain call and put options in March 2011, the redeemable noncontrolling interests in rentalcars.com were reduced from 24.4% to 19.0%. In April 2012, in connection with the exercise of certain call and put options in March 2012, the redeemable noncontrolling interests in rentalcars.comRentalcars.com were reduced from 19.0% to 12.7%. In April 2013, in connection with the exercise of certain call and put options in March 2013, the Company purchased the remaining outstanding shares underlying the redeemable noncontrolling interests. |
| |
(2)(3)
| Includes convertible debt which is classified as a current liability.liability from 2011 through 2014 and 2016. |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes to those statements, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the Section entitled "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As discussed in more detail in the Section entitled "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements," this discussion contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause those differences include those discussed in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We evaluate certain operating and financial measures on both an as-reported and constant-currency basis. We calculate constant currency by converting our current-year period financial results for transactions recorded in currencies other than U.S. Dollars using the corresponding prior-year period monthly average exchange rates rather than the current-year period monthly average exchange rates.
Overview
Our mission is to help people experience the world. We areseek to achieve our mission by providing consumers, travel service providers and restaurants with worldwide leadership in online reservation and related services. We operate six primary, independently managed brands:
Booking.com - the world’s leading brand for booking online accommodation reservations, based on room nights booked.
priceline.com - a leading hotel, rental car, airline ticket and vacation package reservation service in the United States.
KAYAK - a leading meta-search service allowing consumers to easily search and compare travel itineraries and prices, including airline ticket, accommodation and rental car reservation information.
agoda.com - a leading accommodation reservation service catering primarily to consumers in the Asia-Pacific region.
Rentalcars.com - a leading worldwide rental car reservation service.
OpenTable - a leading provider of online travel and travel relatedrestaurant reservation and search services. Through our online travel agent ("OTA")information services we connectto consumers wishing to make travel reservations with providers of travel services around the world. We offer consumers accommodation reservations (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties) through our Booking.com, priceline.com and agoda.com brands. Our priceline.com brand also offers consumers reservations for rental cars, airline tickets, vacation packages and cruises. We offer rental car reservations worldwide through rentalcars.com. We also allow consumers to easily compare airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information from hundreds of travel websites at once through KAYAK. We recently acquired OpenTable, a leading provider of online restaurant reservations. We believe that the online restaurant reservation business is complementarymanagement services to our online travel businesses, and that both OpenTable and our travel businesses will benefit from adding OpenTable to The Priceline Group. restaurants.
We refer to our company and all of our subsidiaries and brands including Booking.com, priceline.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.com and, as of July 24, 2014, OpenTable, collectively as "The Priceline Group," the "Company," "we," "our" or "us."
We launched our business in the United States in 1998 under the priceline.com brand and have since expanded our operations to include Booking.com, KAYAK, agoda.com, rentalcars.com and OpenTable, which are independently managed and operated brands. Our principal goal is to serve consumers and our travel service provider and restaurant partners with worldwide leadership in online reservation services. Our business is driven primarily by international results, which consist of the results of Booking.com, agoda.com and rentalcars.comRentalcars.com and the results of the internationally based websitesinternational businesses of KAYAK and as of July 24, 2014, OpenTable (in each case regardless of where the consumer resides, where the consumer is physically located while making a reservationusing our services or the location of the travel service provider or restaurant). During the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, our international business (the substantial majority of which is generated by Booking.com) represented approximately 87% of our gross bookings (an operating and statistical metric referring to the total dollar value, generally inclusive of all taxes and fees, of all travel services purchased by our customers), and approximately 94%88% of our consolidated operating income. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more geographic information.gross profit. A significant majority of our gross profit is earned in connection with facilitating accommodation reservations. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more geographic information.
We derive substantially all of our gross profit from the following sources:
Commissions earned from facilitating reservations of accommodations, rental cars, cruises and other travel services;services on an agency basis;
Transaction gross profit on a merchant basis and customer processing fees from our accommodation, rental car, airline ticket and vacation package reservation services;
Advertising revenues primarily earned by KAYAK from sending referrals to OTAsOTCs and travel service providers, as well as from advertising placements on KAYAK's websites and mobile apps;
Beginning on July 24, 2014, revenues recognized by OpenTable, which consist of reservation revenues (a feepaid by restaurants for restaurant guestsdiners seated through OpenTable's online reservation service),services, subscription fees for restaurant reservation management services provided by OpenTable and other OpenTable revenues; and
| |
• | Global distribution system ("GDS") reservation booking fees related to our Name Your Own Price® hotel, rental car and airline ticket reservation services, and price-disclosed airline ticket and rental car reservation services.Damage excess waiver fees, travel insurance fees and global distribution system ("GDS") reservation booking fees, in each case related to certain of our travel services.
|
Our priceline.com brand offers merchant Name Your Own Price® opaque travel services, which are recorded in revenue on a "gross" basis and have associated cost of revenue. All of our other services are recorded in revenue on a "net" basis and have no associated cost of revenue. Therefore, revenue increases and decreases are impacted by changes in the mix of our revenues between Name Your Own Price® travel services and other services. Gross profit reflects the commission or net margin earned for all of our retail, Name Your Own Price® and semi-opaque travel services and our advertising and other services. Consequently, gross profit is an important measure to evaluate growth in our business because, in contrast to our revenues, it is not affected by
the different methods of recording revenue and cost of revenue between our Name Your Own Price® travel reservation services and our other services.
Trends
Over the last several years we have experienced strong growth in our accommodation reservation services. We believe this growth is the result of, among other things, the broader shift of travel purchases from offline to online, the widespread adoption of mobile devices, the high growth of travel overall in emerging markets such as Asia-Pacific and South America, and the continued innovation and execution by our teams around the world to build accommodation supply, content and distribution and to improve the customerconsumer experience on our websites and mobile apps. These year-over-year growth rates have generally decelerated in recent years. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2014, our accommodation room night reservation growth was 28%, a deceleration from 37% in 2013, 40% in 2012 and 53% in 2011.decelerated. Given the size of our hotelaccommodation reservation business, we expect that our year-over-year growth rates will generally continue to decelerate, though the rate of deceleration may fluctuate.fluctuate and there may be periods of acceleration from time to time. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2016, our accommodation room night reservation growth was 29%, as compared to 25% in 2015, 28% in 2014, 37% in 2013 and 40% in 2012.
Our international business represents the substantial majority of our financial results, and we expect our operating results and other financial metrics to continue to be largely driven by international performance. The size of the travel market outside of the United States is substantially greater than that within the United States. Historically, Internet use and e-commerce activity of international consumers have trailed that of consumers in the United States. However, international consumers are rapidlyincreasingly moving to online means for purchasing travel. Accordingly, recent international online travel growth rates have substantially exceeded, and are expected to continue to exceed, the growth rates within the United States. We expect that over the long-term,long term, international online travel growth rates will follow a similar trend to that experienced in the United States. In addition, the base of hotel properties in Europe and Asia is particularly fragmented compared to that in the United States, where the hotel market is dominated by large hotel chains. We believe online reservation systems like ours may be more appealing to small chains and independent hotels more commonly found outside of the United States. Our growth has primarily been generated by our international accommodation reservation service brands, Booking.com and agoda.com. Booking.com, our most significant brand, included over 600,000 properties on its website as of February 13, 2015, which included over 245,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are available on the Booking.com website). Booking.com has added properties over the past year in its core European market as well as higher-growth markets such as North America (which is a newer market for Booking.com), Asia-Pacific and South America. An increasing amount of our business from both a destination and point-of-sale perspective is conducted in our newer markets which are growing faster than our overall growth rate. We believe that the opportunity to continue to grow our business exists for the markets in which we operate. We believe these trends and factors have enabled us to become the leading online accommodation reservation service provider in the world as measured by room nights booked.
As our international business represents We believe that the substantial majority of our financial results, we expectopportunity to continue to seegrow our operating results and other financial metrics largely driven by international performance. For example, certainbusiness exists for the markets in which we operate thatoperate.
Our growth has primarily been generated by our worldwide accommodation reservation service brand, Booking.com, which is our most significant brand, and has been due, in part, to the availability of a large and growing number of directly bookable properties through Booking.com. Booking.com included over 1,115,000 properties on its website as of December 31, 2016, which included over 568,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are in earlier stagesavailable on the Booking.com website), and compares to over 852,000 properties (including over 390,000 vacation rental properties) as of development have lower operating margins compared to more mature markets, which could have a negative impact on our overall margins as these markets increase in size over time. Also, weDecember 31, 2015.
We intend to continue to invest in adding accommodations available for reservation on our websites, including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels and vacation rentals. Vacation rentals generally consist of, among others, properties categorized as single-unit and multi-unit villas, apartments, "aparthotels" (which are apartments with a front desk and cleaning service) and chalets and are generally self-catered (i.e., include a kitchen), directly bookable properties. Many of the newer accommodations we add to our travel reservation services, especially in highly penetrated markets, may have fewer rooms lower average daily rates ("ADRs") or higher credit risk and may appeal to a smaller subset of consumers (e.g., hostels and bed and breakfasts), and therefore may also negatively impact our margins. For example, because. Because a vacation rental is typically either a single unit or a small collection of independent units, vacation rental propertiesaccommodations represent more limited booking opportunities than non-vacation rental properties, which generally have more units to rent per property. Our non-hotelvacation rental accommodations in general may be subject to increased seasonality due to local tourism seasons, weather or other factors. Our vacation rental accommodation business may also experience lower profit margins due to certain additional costs related to offering these accommodations on our websites. As we increase our non-hotelvacation rental accommodation business, these different market characteristics could negatively impact our profit margins; and, to the extent these properties represent an increasing percentage of the properties added to our websites, we expect that our gross bookings growth rate and property growth rate will likelycontinue to diverge over time (since each such property has fewer booking opportunities). As a result of the foregoing, as the percentage of non-hotel accommodationsvacation rental properties increases, we expect that the number of reservations per property will likely continue to decrease. In addition, non-hotelWe believe that continuing to expand the number and variety of accommodations including vacation rentals, tendavailable through our services, in particular Booking.com, will help us to be more seasonal in nature and may close during "off-season," which impactscontinue to grow our property counts quarter to quarter.accommodation reservation business.
As part of our strategy to increase the number and variety of accommodations available on Booking.com, Booking.com is increasingly processing transactions on a merchant basis where it facilitates payments on behalf of customers. This allows Booking.com to process transactions for properties that do not accept credit cards and to increase its ability to offer flexible transaction terms to consumers, such as the form and timing of payment. Although we will incur additional payment processing costs and chargebacks related to these transactions, which are recorded as sales and marketing expenses in our statement of operations and which will negatively impact our operating margins, we believe that adding these types of properties and service offerings will benefit our customers and our gross bookings, room night and earnings growth rates.
Concerns persist about the outlook for the global economy in general, andincluding uncertainty in the European Union in particular, with recent declines in broad Eurozoneand China. Perceived or actual adverse economic indicators raising fears about the pace ofconditions, including slow, slowing or negative economic growth, unemployment rates and the risk of deflation. In addition, many governments around the world, including the U.S.weakening currencies and concerns over government and certain European governments, continue to operate at large financial deficits, resulting in high levels of sovereign debt inresponses such countries. Greece, Ireland, Portugal and certain other European Union countries with high levels of sovereign debt at times have had difficulty refinancing
their debt. Failure to reach political consensus regarding workable solutions to these issues has resulted in a high level of uncertainty regarding the future economic outlook. This uncertainty, as well as concern over governmental austerity measures including higher taxes and reduced government spending, could impair consumer spending and adversely affect travel demand. Further, uncertainty regarding the future of the European Union following the United Kingdom’s vote to leave (“Brexit”) and concerns regarding certain E.U. members with sovereign debt default risks could also negatively affect consumer spending and adversely affect travel demand. At times, we have experienced volatility in transaction growth rates, increased cancellation rates and weaker trends in hotel ADRs across many regions of the world, particularly in those European countries that appear to be most affected by economic uncertainties. Weuncertainties, which we believe that these business trends are likely impacted by weak economicdue at least in part to macro-economic conditions and sovereign debt concerns. DisruptionsFor more detail, see Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "Declines or disruptions in the economies of such countriestravel industry could cause, contribute to or be indicative of deteriorating macro-economic conditions.adversely affect our business and financial performance."
Greece's newly elected government, which campaigned against austerity measures, may not be able to reach an acceptable solution to the country's debt crisis with the European Union. This may increase the likelihood that Greece, and in turn other countries, could exit the European Union, which could lead to added economic uncertainty and further devaluation or eventual abandonment of the Euro common currency. These and other macro-economic uncertainties, such as sovereign default risk becoming more widespread, declining oil prices, and geopolitical tensions and differing central bank monetary policies, have led to significant volatility in the exchange raterates between the Euro, the U.S. Dollar and the Euro, the British Pound Sterling and other currencies. The European Central Bank,Significant fluctuations in an effort to stimulate the European economy, recently launched a quantitative easing program to purchase public debt, which in turn has caused the Eurocurrency exchange rate to weaken compared to the U.S. Dollar.rates, stock markets and oil prices can also impact consumer travel behavior.
OurAs noted earlier, our international business represents a substantial majority of our financial results. During the year ended December 31, 2014, our international business (the substantial majority of which is generated by Booking.com) represented approximately 87% of our gross bookings (an operating and statistical metric referring to the total dollar value, generally inclusive of all taxes and fees, of all travel services purchased by our customers), and approximately 94% of our consolidated operating income. Therefore, because we report our results in U.S. Dollars, we face exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of our international businesses are translated from local currency (principally the EuroEuros and the British PoundPounds Sterling) into U.S. Dollars. TheThroughout 2015, the U.S. Dollar strengthened significantly year-over-year relative to substantially all currencies in which we transact, most notably the Euro, Brazilian Real, British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and Australian Dollar. In 2016, the U.S. Dollar continued to be stronger year-over-year relative to the British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and many other major currencies in which we transact. Since the "Brexit" referendum in the United Kingdom in June 2016, the U.S. Dollar has strengthened significantly against the Euro during 2014, moving from anBritish Pound Sterling. As a result of these currency exchange rate of 1.38 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 1, 2014 to 1.13 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 31, 2015. The U.S. Dollar also strengthened significantly during this time frame as compared to many other currencies. As a result,changes, our foreign currency denominated net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses and net income have been negatively impacted as expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Dollars, although to a much lesser extent in 2016 than in 2015. For example, gross profit from our international operations grew year-over-year on a local currency basis by approximately 32%22.3% for the three monthsyear ended December 31, 2014,2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, but, as a result ofwithout the negative impact of changes in currency exchange rates, grew 24% as reportedyear-over-year on a constant-currency basis by approximately 25%. Since our expenses are generally denominated in U.S. Dollars.foreign currencies on a basis similar to our revenues, our operating margins are not significantly impacted by currency fluctuations. The U.S. Dollar significantly strengthened against the Euro during 2014, moving from an exchange rate of 1.38 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 1, 2014 to 1.21 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of December 31, 2014. The U.S. Dollar strengthened further in January 2015 to an exchange rate of 1.13 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 31, 2015. The U.S. Dollar has also strengthened against many other currencies since January 1, 2014. At these exchange rates, the growthaggregate principal value of our totalEuro-denominated 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and international gross bookings, expressed2027 Notes, and accrued interest thereon, provide a natural hedge of the net assets of certain of our Euro functional currency subsidiaries. For more information, see Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "We are exposed to fluctuations in U.S. Dollars, will be significantly adversely impacted in 2015. currency exchange rates."
We generally enter into derivative instruments to minimize the impact of short-term currency fluctuations on the translation of our consolidated operating results.results into U.S. Dollars. However, such derivative instruments are short-termshort term in nature and not designed to hedge against currency fluctuations that could impact growth rates for our gross bookings, revenues or gross profit (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our derivative contracts).
Significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates can also impact consumer travel behavior. For example, recent dramatic depreciation of the Russian Ruble has resulted in it becoming more expensive for Russians to travel to Europe and most other non-Ruble destinations. Consumers traveling from a country whose currency has weakened against other currencies may book lower ADR accommodations, choose to shorten or cancel their international travel plans or choose to travel domestically rather than internationally, any of which could adversely affect our gross bookings, revenues and results of operations, in particular when expressed in U.S. Dollars.
The uncertainty of macro-economic factors, the volatility in foreign exchange rates and their impact on consumer behavior, which may differ across regions, makes it more difficult to forecast industry and consumer trends and the timing and degree of their impact on our markets and business, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to effectively manage our business and adversely affect our results of operations.
We compete globally with both online and traditional providers of travel and travel relatedrestaurant reservation and searchrelated services. The marketmarkets for the travel reservation and search services we offer isare intensely competitive a trend we expect to continue, and current and new competitors can launch new services at a relatively low cost. We currently, or potentially may in the future, compete with a varietySome of companies, including:
online travel reservation services such as those owned by Expedia, Orbitz (which has agreed to be acquired by Expedia), Ctrip, Rakuten, eDreams ODIGEOour current and Jalan;
online accommodation search and/or reservation services, such as HomeAway and Airbnb, focused on vacation rental properties, including individually owned properties;
large online companies, including search, social networking and marketplace companiespotential competitors, such as Google, Facebook,Apple, Alibaba, Amazon and Groupon;
traditionalFacebook, have access to significantly greater and more diversified resources than we do, and they may be able to leverage other aspects of their businesses (e.g., search or mobile device businesses) to enable them to compete more effectively with us. For example, Google has entered various aspects of the online travel agencies, wholesalersmarket, including by establishing a flight meta-search product (“Google Flights”) and tour operators, such as Carlson Wagonlit, American Express, Thomas Cook and Tui Travel,a hotel meta-search business ("Hotel Ads") that are growing rapidly, as well as thousands of individual travel agencies around the world;
its "Book on Google" reservation functionality. Our markets are also subject to rapidly changing conditions, including technological developments, consumer behavior changes, regulatory changes and travel service providers such as accommodation providers, rental car companies and airlines;
online travel search and price comparison services (generally referredprovider consolidation. We expect these trends to as "meta-search" services), such as TripAdvisor, trivago (in which Expedia has acquired a majority ownership interest), Qunar and HotelsCombined; and
online restaurant reservation services, such as TripAdvisor's LaFourchette and Yelp's SeatMe.
continue. For more detail regarding the competitive trends and risksexample, we face, see Part I Item 1 Business - "Competition" and Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "Intense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance." and "Recent trends in consumer adoption and use of mobile devices create new challenges and may enable device companies such as Apple to compete directly with us."
After entering into an exclusive, long-term strategic marketing agreement in August 2013, Expedia acquired Travelocity in January 2015. On February 12, 2015, Expedia announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Orbitz. To the extent these acquisitions enhance Expedia's ability to compete with us, in particular in the United States, which is Expedia's, Travelocity's and Orbitz's largest market, our market share and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Widespread adoption of mobile devices, such as the iPhone, Android-enabled smart phones and tablets such as the iPad, coupled with the improved web browsing functionality and development of thousands of useful "apps" available on these devices, is driving substantial online traffic and commerce to mobile platforms. We have experienced a significant shift of both direct and indirect business to mobile platforms and our advertising partners are also seeing a rapid shift of traffic to mobile platforms. Our major competitors and certain new market entrants are offering mobile applications for travel products and other mobile functionality, including proprietary last-minute discounts for accommodation reservations. Advertising and distribution
opportunities may be more limited on mobile devices given their smaller screen sizes. TheIn addition, the gross profit earned on a mobile transaction may be less than a typical desktop transaction due to different consumer purchasing patterns. For example, accommodation reservations made on a mobile device typically are for shorter lengths of stay and are not made as far in advance. Further, givenFor more detail regarding the competitive trends and risks we face, see Part I Item 1 Business - "Competition", Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "Intense competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance." and "Consumer adoption and use of mobile devices creates new challenges and may enable device sizescompanies such as Apple to compete directly with us." and technical limitations of tablets and smart phones, mobile consumers"We may not be willingable to download multiple apps from multiple companies providing a similar service and instead prefer to use one or a limited number of apps for their mobile travel and restaurant research and reservation activity. As a result, the consumer experiencekeep up with mobile apps as well as brand recognition and loyalty are likely to become increasingly important. Our mobile offerings have received strong reviews and achieved solid download trends, and are driving a material and increasing share of our business. We believe that mobile bookings present an opportunity for growth and are necessary to maintain and grow our business as consumers increasingly turn to mobile devices instead of a personal computer and to mobile applications in addition to a web browser. If we are unable to continue to rapidly innovate and create new, user-friendly and differentiated mobile offerings and efficiently and effectively advertise and distribute on these platforms, or if our mobile apps are not downloaded and used by consumers, we could lose market share to existing competitors or new entrants and our future growth and results of operations could be adversely affected.rapid technological changes."
In addition, weWe have observed an increase in promotional pricing to closed user groups (such as loyalty program participants or customersconsumers with registered accounts), including through mobile apps. If weFor example, Marriott International, Hilton, Hyatt Hotels, InterContinental Hotel Group and Choice Hotels International have launched additional initiatives to encourage consumers to book accommodations directly through their websites, with increased discounting and incentives.
In addition to providing retail travel reservation services, our priceline.com brand is a leading provider of discounted opaque travel reservation services in the United States through its Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® offerings. These discounted services are referred to as "opaque" because certain elements of the reservation, including the name of the travel service provider, are not as effective asmade known to the traveler until after the reservation is made. In general, we expect that over time our opaque services will continue to decrease in relative importance to our overall business due, we believe, to a variety of factors, including the growth rates of our retail businesses, competition, relative complexity, travel restrictions often required by the travel service provider, difficulty in offering discounted pricesthese services on mobile devices, increased discounts available to consumers through closed user groups, or if we are unable to entice membersand limited availability of our competitors' closed user groups to use our services, our ability to grow and compete could be harmed. Further, growth in discounted closed user group retail prices for hotel rooms lessens the price difference for memberstravel reservations from travel service providers, particularly during periods of closed user groups between a retail hotel reservation and an opaque hotel reservation, which may lead to fewer consumers using our opaque hotel reservation services. If we need to fund discounts out of our gross profit, our profitability could be adversely affected.high consumer demand.
We have established widely used and recognized e-commerce brands through aggressive marketing and promotional campaigns. As a result, bothBoth our onlineperformance and offlinebrand advertising expense hasexpenses have increased significantly in recent years, a trend we expect to continue. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, our total onlineperformance advertising expense was approximately $2.4$3.5 billion, a substantial portion$2.7 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, primarily related to the use of
which was spent internationally through Internet online search engines (primarily Google), meta-search and travel research services and affiliate marketing.marketing to generate traffic to our websites. We also invested $231approximately $296 million, $274 million and $257 million in offlinebrand advertising during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, primarily related to costs associated with producing and airing television advertising, online video advertising (for example, on YouTube and Facebook) and online display advertising. We intend to continue a strategy of aggressively promoting brand awareness primarily through both online means although we also intend to increase ourand offline advertising efforts, including by expanding offlinebrand campaigns into additional markets. For example, building on its first offline advertising campaign, which it launched in the United States in 2013, Booking.com has begun offline advertising campaigns in other markets, including Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany. We have observed increased offlinebrand advertising by OTAs,OTCs, meta-search services and travel service providers, particularly in North America and Europe, which may make our offlinebrand advertising efforts more expensive and less effective.
OnlinePerformance advertising efficiency, expressed as onlineperformance advertising expense as a percentage of gross profit, is impacted by a number of factors that are subject to variability and that are, in some cases, outside of our control, including ADRs, costs per click, cancellation rates, foreign exchange rates, our ability to convert paid traffic to booking customers and the extent to which consumers come directly to our websites or mobile apps for bookings. For example, competition for desired rankings in search results and/or a decline in ad clicks by consumers could increase our costs-per-click and reduce our onlineperformance advertising efficiency. From 2011We have also experienced increasing cancellation rates, which we expect to 2013continue and which negatively affects our online advertising grew faster than our gross profit due to (1) year-over-year declinesefficiency and results of operations. Changes by Google in online advertising returns on investment ("ROIs") and (2) brand mix within The Priceline Group as our international brands grew faster than our U.S. brands and spent a higher percentage of gross profit on online advertising. In 2014, these long-term trends were more than offset by the inclusion of KAYAK and OpenTable because they spend a lower percentage of gross profit on online advertising than our other brands. Also, our consolidated results exclude intercompany advertising by our brands on KAYAK since our acquisition of KAYAK in May 2013. If Google changes how it presents travel search results, including by placing its own offerings at or near the top of search results, or the manner in which it conducts the auction for placement among search results in a manner that ismay be competitively disadvantageous to us whether to support its own travel related services or otherwise,and may impact our ability to efficiently generate traffic to our websites couldwebsites. We have observed a long-term trend of decreasing performance advertising returns on investment ("ROIs"), a trend we expect to continue, though the rate of decrease may fluctuate and there may be harmed.periods of stable or increasing ROIs from time to time. See Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "We rely on onlineperformance and brand advertising channels to enhance our brand awareness and to generate a significant amount of traffic to our websites.websites and grow our business." and "Our business could be negatively affected by changes in Internet search engine algorithms and dynamics or traffic-generating arrangements."
The national competition authorities ("NCAs") of many governments have begunconducted or are conducting investigations into competitive practices within the online travel industry, and we may be involved or affected by such investigations and their results. Some countries have adopted or proposed legislation that could also affect business practices within the online travel industry. For example, Booking.com has beenin August 2015, France adopted legislation known as the subject of a competition investigation by U.K. competition authorities since July 2012. Other national competition authorities,"Macron Law" making price parity agreements illegal, including those that had been approved by the French NCA, and similar legislation may be enacted in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Sweden and Switzerland, haveother counties. For more recently opened investigations that focusinformation on Booking.com's rate parity clause in its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions. We are currently unable to predict the outcome of all of these investigations or howand their potential effects on our business, may be affected. Possible outcomes include requiring Booking.com to remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions. In the U.K. investigation, Booking.com and the other subjects of the investigation had reached a settlement with the competition authorities; however, that settlement has been vacated on appeal. On December 15, 2014, the French, Italian and Swedish national competition authorities, working in close cooperation with the European Commission, announced their intention to seek public feedback on commitments offered by Booking.com in connection with investigations of Booking.com's rate parity provisions in its contractual arrangements with accommodation providers. See Footnote 16see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements and Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "As the size of our business grows, we may become increasingly subject to the scrutiny of anti-trust and competition regulators." We note that the German competition authority has required Hotel Reservation Service, a leading OTA in Germany, to remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with hotels, and Hotel Reservation Service's initial appeal was denied. To the extent that regulatory authorities require changes to our business practices or to those currently common to the industry, our business, competitive position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Negative publicity regarding any such investigations could adversely affect our brand and therefore our market share and results of operations.
Hotels typically make available only a limited number of hotel rooms for opaque services like ours, especially during periods of high occupancy. As a result, recent high hotel occupancy levels in the United States have had an adverse impact on our access to hotel rooms for our opaque hotel reservation services, which has negatively affected our opaque hotel reservation gross profits.
Seasonality
A meaningful amount of our gross bookings are generated early in the year, as customers plan and reserve their spring and summer vacations in Europe and North America. FromHowever, we generally do not recognize revenue from these bookings until the travel occurs, which can be in a cost perspective,quarter other than when the reservation is booked. In contrast, we expense the substantial majority of our advertising activities as the expense is incurred, which, in the case of performance advertising in particular, is typically in the quarter in which associated reservations are booked. However,As a result of this potential timing difference between when we generally do notrecord advertising expense and when we recognize associated revenue, until future quarters when the travel occurs. As a result, we typically experiencehave historically experienced our highest levels of profitability in the second and third quarters of the year, which is when we experience the highest levels of accommodation checkouts for the year for our European and North American businesses. The first quarter of the year is typically our lowest level of profitability and may experience volatility in earnings growth rates due to these seasonal timing factors. For our Asia-Pacific business, we experience the highest levels of accommodation bookings in the third and fourth quarters of the year, and the highest levels of travel consumption in the fourth quarter. As the relative growth rates for these businesses fluctuate, the quarterly distribution of our operating results may vary.
In addition, the date on which certain holidays fall can have an impact on our quarterly results. For example, in 20132016, our secondfirst quarter year-over-year growth rates in revenue, gross profit, operating income and operating margins were adversely affectedpositively impacted by Easter falling in the first quarter instead of the second quarter, as it did in 2012.2015. Conversely, our second quarter 20142016 year-over-year growth rates in revenue, gross profit, operating income and operating margins were favorablyadversely impacted by Easter falling in the first quarter instead of the second quarter, as it did in 2015. Similarly to 2015, in 2017 Easter will fall in the second quarter instead of the first quarter, and will therefore have a negative effect on our first quarter 2017 year-over-year growth rates and a positive effect on our second quarter 2017 year-over-year growth rates as it didcompared to the same periods in 2013.2016 when Easter fell in the first quarter. The timing of other holidays such as Chinese New Year, Carnival and Ramadan can also impact our quarterly year-over-year growth rates.
The impact of seasonality can be exaggerated in the short-termshort term by the gross bookings growth rate of the business. For example, in periods where our gross bookings growth rate substantially decelerates, our operating margins typically benefit from relatively less variable advertising expense. In addition, gross profit growth is typically less impacted by decelerating gross bookings growth in the near term due to the benefit of revenue related to reservations booked in previous quarters.
We experience the highest levels of booking and travel consumption for Conversely, in periods where our Asia-Pacific and South American businessesgross bookings growth rate accelerates, our operating margins are typically negatively impacted by relatively more variable advertising expense. In addition, gross profit growth is typically less impacted by accelerating gross bookings growth in the first and fourth quarters. Therefore, if these businesses grow faster than our North American and European businesses, our operating results for the first and fourth quartersnear term as a portion of the year may become more significant over time as a percentage of full year operating results.revenue recognized from such gross bookings will occur in future quarters.
Other Factors
We believe that our future success depends in large part on our ability to continue to profitably grow our brands worldwide, and, over time, to offer other travel and travel related services and further expand into other international markets.travel-related services. Factors beyond our control, such as worldwide recession, oil prices, terrorist attacks, unusual or extreme weather patterns,or natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, droughts and volcanic eruptions, travel relatedtravel-related health concerns including pandemics and epidemics such as Ebola, Zika, Influenza H1N1, avian bird flu, SARS and SARS,MERS, political instability, regional hostilities, imposition of taxes or surcharges by regulatory authorities or travel-related accidents, can disrupt travel related accidents, couldor otherwise result in declines in travel demand. Because these events or concerns are largely unpredictable, they can dramatically and suddenly affect travel behavior by consumers, and therefore demand for our services, which can adversely affect our business and results of operations and impair our ability to effectively implement alloperations. See Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - “Declines or some of the initiatives described above.
For example, in late 2012 Hurricane Sandy disrupted traveldisruptions in the northeastern United States. In early 2011, Japan was struck by a major earthquake, tsunami and nuclear emergency. In October 2011, severe flooding in Thailand, a key market for our agoda.com business and the Asian business of Booking.com, negatively impacted booking volumes and cancellation rates in this market. In addition, Thailand has recently experienced disruptive civil unrest, which has negatively impacted booking volumes and cancellation rates in this market. In early 2010, Thailand also experienced civil unrest, which caused the temporary relocation of agoda.com's Thailand-based operations. Future natural disasters, health concerns or civil or political unresttravel industry could further disruptadversely affect our business and operations.financial performance.”
We intend to continue to invest in marketing and promotion, technology and personnel within parameters consistent with attempts to improve long-term operating results, even if those expenditures create pressure on operating margins. We have experienced pressure on operating margins as we prioritize initiatives that drive growth. We also intend to broaden the scope of our business, and to that end, we explore strategic alternatives from time to time in the form of, among other things, mergers and acquisitions. Our goal is to grow gross profit and achieve healthy operating margins in an effort to maintain profitability. The uncertain and highly competitive environment described abovein which we operate makes the prediction of future results of operations difficult, and accordingly, we may not be able to sustain gross profit growth and profitability.
On July 24, 2014, we acquired OpenTable, a leading provider of online restaurant reservations, for $2.5 billion ($2.4 billion net of cash acquired) and on May 21, 2013, we acquired KAYAK Software Corporation, a leading travel meta-search service, for $2.1 billion ($1.9 billion net of cash acquired). A substantial portion of the total consideration for these acquisitions related to identifiable acquired intangibles and goodwill (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). In 2015, we intend to invest in OpenTable to accelerate its global expansion, increase the value offered to its restaurant partners and enhance the end-to-end experience for customers across desktop and mobile devices. As a result, we expect OpenTable's profitability in 2015 to decline year-over-year as we invest for future growth. If the investments we intend to make in 2015 and beyond, in particular internationally, are unsuccessful in growing OpenTable's global online restaurant reservation business or OpenTable experiences a significant reduction in revenues or profitability due to factors such as competition, increased capital expenditures or investments in its business, we may incur an impairment. Likewise, if KAYAK is unsuccessful in profitably growing its global online travel brand or it experiences a significant reduction in advertising revenues on its websites or mobile apps or profitability due to factors such as a loss of continued access to travel services information provided by other OTAs or travel service providers, we may incur an impairment.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our significant accounting policies and estimates are more fully described in Note 2 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Certain of our accounting policies and estimates are particularly important to our financial position and results of operations and require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. In applying those policies, ourOur management uses its judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. On an on-going basis, weWe evaluate our estimates including those related to the items described below. Those estimateson an ongoing basis. Estimates are based on, among other things, historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the travel industry and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our significantcritical accounting policies that involve significant estimates and judgments of management include the following:
Accounting for Travel Transaction Taxes. As discussed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are currently involved in approximately forty lawsuits brought by or against states, cities and counties over issues involving the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g. hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). In addition, over seventy-nine municipalities or counties, and at least eleven states, have initiated audit proceedings, issued proposed tax assessments or started inquiries relating to the payment of travel transaction taxes. Additional state and local jurisdictions are likely to assert that we are subject to travel transaction taxes and could seek to collect such taxes, retroactively and/or prospectively. Historically, we have not collected travel transaction taxes on the gross profit earned from merchant hotel transactions; however, in a handful of jurisdictions, we have been required recently by passage of a new statute or by court order to start collecting and remitting certain taxes (local occupancy and/or sales or excise tax) imposed upon our margin and/or service fee, or in the case of Hawaii, on the full amount collected from the consumer. The ultimate resolution of these matters in all jurisdictions cannot be determined at this time. We have established an accrual (including estimated interest and penalties) for potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes for prior and current periods, consistent with applicable accounting principles and in light of all current facts and circumstances. We accrue for legal contingencies where it is probable that a loss has occurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated; our legal expenses for these matters are expensed as incurred and are not reflected in the amount accrued. A variety of factors could affect the amount of the liability (both past and future), which factors include, but are not limited to, the number of, and amount of gross profit represented by, jurisdictions that ultimately assert a claim and prevail in assessing such additional tax or negotiate a settlement and changes in relevant statutes. The ultimate resolution of these matters may be greater or less than the liabilities recorded.
Stock-Based Compensation. We record stock-based compensation expense for equity-based awards over the recipient's service period based upon the grant date fair value of the award. A number of our equity awards have performance targets (a performance "contingency") which, if satisfied, can increase the number of shares issued to the recipients at the end of the performance period or, in certain instances, if not satisfied, reduce the number of shares issued to the recipients, sometimes to zero, at the end of the performance period. The performance periods for our performance based equity awards are typically three years. We record stock-based compensation expense for these performance-based awards based upon our estimate of the probable outcome at the end of the performance period (i.e., the estimated performance against the performance targets). We periodically adjust the cumulative stock-based compensation expense recorded when the probable outcome for these performance-based awards is updated based upon changes in actual and forecasted operating results. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 20122014 includes charges amounting to $20.6$20.7 million, $24.1$22.6 million and $0.9$20.6 million, respectively, representing the impact of adjusting the estimated probable outcome of unvested performance share units. Our actual performance against the performance targets could differ materially from our estimates.
We record stock-based compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures. In determining the estimated forfeiture rates, we periodically review actual forfeitures.forfeitures and update our estimates for future forfeitures, if necessary. To the extent that actual forfeiture rates differ from current estimates, such amounts are recorded as a cumulative expense adjustment is recorded in the period in which the estimate is revised.revised (see "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for accounting changes that are effective January 1, 2017).
Valuation of Goodwill, Long-Lived Assets and Intangibles. The application of the purchase method of accounting for business combinations requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions to determine
the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in order to properly allocate the purchase price consideration between identifiable intangible assets from goodwill.assumed. Our estimates of the fair value of assets and liabilities assumed are based upon assumptions that we believe are reasonable and, when we deem appropriate, include assistance from a third party valuation firm. The purchase price consideration is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price consideration over the net of the amounts allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. Goodwill is reviewed at leastassigned to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination as of the acquisition date.
We review goodwill for impairment annually for impairment. Excludingand whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. A substantial portion of our intangibles and goodwill relates to the acquisitions of OpenTable which was acquired in July 2014 and KAYAK in May 2013. As of September 30, 2016, we performed our annual goodwill impairment testing. Other than OpenTable, the fair values of our reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. For OpenTable, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge for goodwill of $940.7 million, which is not tax deductible, resulting in an adjusted carrying value of OpenTable goodwill of $580.1 million as of September 30, 2016. The goodwill impairment charge was included in operating expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. OpenTable’s estimated fair value was determined using a combination of our other reporting units substantially exceed their respective carrying values.standard valuation techniques, including an income approach (discounted cash flows) and market approaches (EBITDA multiples of comparable publicly-traded companies and precedent transactions). Since the annual impairment test inas of September 2014,30, 2016, there have been no further events or changes in circumstances to indicate a potential impairment.
The goodwill impairment is primarily the result of a change in OpenTable’s business strategy that occurred during the third quarter of 2016. OpenTable’s post-acquisition strategy was premised on significant and rapid investment in international expansion and various other growth initiatives, resulting in near-term reduced earnings and profit margins but with the goal of achieving significantly increased revenues and profitability
in the long term. This strategy has resulted in limited progress to date. As a result, while OpenTable intends to continue to pursue and invest in international expansion and its other growth initiatives, it intends to do so in a more measured and deliberate manner. This change in strategy resulted in OpenTable updating its forecasted financial results to reflect (a) a material reduction in forecasted long-term financial results from these initiatives, partially offset by (b) improved earnings and profit margins in the near term as a result of the reduced investments. Based on the updated forecast, we estimated a significant reduction in the fair value of the OpenTable business and recorded the goodwill impairment discussed above.
Future events and changing market conditions may lead us to again re-evaluate the assumptions reflected in the updated forecast, including key assumptions regarding OpenTable's expected growth rates and operating margins and the success and timing of its international expansion and other growth initiatives, as well as other key assumptions with respect to matters outside of our control, such as discount rates, currency exchange rates, market EBITDA comparables, and changes in accounting policies or practices, including the January 2017 accounting update that changes the goodwill impairment testing methodology (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). If OpenTable does not achieve the results currently expected, its investments, in particular its investments in its international expansion efforts and other growth initiatives, are not successful, or any of the assumptions underlying our estimate of the value of the OpenTable business, including those mentioned above, prove to be incorrect, we may further refine our forecast for the OpenTable business and recognize an additional goodwill impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Additionally, we evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred which indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets and intangibles may not be impaired.recoverable. The significant factors that are considered that could trigger an impairment review include changes in business strategies, market conditions, or the manner of use of an asset; under performance relative to historical or expected future operating results; and negative industry or economic trends. In evaluating an asset for possible impairment, management estimates that asset's future undiscounted cash flows to measure whether the carrying value of the asset is recoverable. If it is determined that the asset is not recoverable, we measure the impairment based upon the fair value of the asset compared to its carrying value. The fair value represents the projected discounted cash flows of the asset over its remaining life.
As a result We tested the recoverability of our recent acquisitionsOpenTable’s other long-lived assets and concluded there was no impairment as of OpenTable and KAYAK in July 2014 and May 2013, respectively, we have recorded a significant amount of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Refer to Note 20 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. In 2015, we intend to invest in OpenTable to accelerate its global expansion, increase the value offered to its restaurant partners and enhance the end-to-end experience for customers across desktop and mobile devices. As a result, we expect OpenTable's profitability in 2015 to decline year-over-year as we invest for future growth. If the investments we intend to make in 2015 and beyond, in particular internationally, are unsuccessful in growing OpenTable's global online restaurant reservation business or OpenTable experiences a significant reduction in revenues or profitability due to factors such as competition, increased capital expenditures or investments in its business, we may incur an impairment. Likewise, if KAYAK is unsuccessful in profitably growing its global online travel brand or it experiences a significant reduction in advertising revenues on its websites or mobile apps or profitability due to factors such as a loss of continued access to travel services information provided by other OTAs or travel service providers, we may incur an impairment charge.September 30, 2016.
Income Taxes. We determine our tax expense based on our income and statutory tax rates applicable in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Due to the complex nature of tax legislation and frequent changes with such associated legislation, significant judgment is required in computing our tax expense and determining our tax positions. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability considering historical profitability, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of temporary differences and tax planning strategies and record valuation allowances as required.
We are subject to ongoing tax examinations and assessments in various jurisdictions. To date, we have been audited in several taxing jurisdictions with no significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Although we believe that our tax filing positions are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits or tax disputes may be different from what is reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Accordingly, we may incur additional tax expense based upon our assessment of the more likely than not outcomes or we may adjust previously recorded tax expense to reflect examination results.
We intend to indefinitely reinvest the unremitted earnings of our foreign earnings in our non-U.S. operations.international subsidiaries outside of the United States. At December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, we had approximately $7.3$13.0 billion and $4.9$9.9 billion, respectively, of foreign earnings indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determinecumulative unremitted international earnings. We estimate that the U.S. federal incomedeferred tax liability thatwe would be payablerecord if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested.reinvested internationally is approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2016.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details, which is incorporated into this Item 7 by reference thereto.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") issued a new accounting standard on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers that is designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and jurisdictions. The core principle of the standard is that an "entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services." Additionally, the new
guidance specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. The new standard will also require enhanced disclosures. The accounting standard is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted under U.S. GAAP and retrospective application is permitted but not required. We are currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements of adopting this new guidance.
In April 2014, the FASB issued an accounting update which amends the definition of a discontinued operation. The new definition limits discontinued operations reporting to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The new definition includes an acquired business that is classified as held for sale at the date of acquisition. The accounting update requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity. The accounting update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. We adopted this update in the first quarter of 2015 and this accounting update did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued an accounting update which provides guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward exists in the same taxing jurisdiction. Per this guidance, an entity must present the unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to a deferred tax asset, except when the carryforward is not available as of the reporting date under the governing tax law to settle taxes or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This amendment does not impact the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions or the disclosure reconciliation of gross unrecognized tax benefits. The update is effective for public companies beginning after December 15, 2013. We adopted this update in the first quarter of 2014 and this accounting update did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 20142016 compared to Year Ended December 31, 20132015
Operating and Statistical Metrics
Our financial results are driven by certain operating metrics that encompass the booking and other business activity generated by our travel and travel relatedtravel-related services. Specifically, reservations of accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets capture the volume of units purchasedbooked through our OTC brands by our travel reservation services customers. Gross bookings is an operating and statistical metric that captures the total dollar value, generally inclusive of taxes and fees, of all travel services booked through our OTC brands by our customers, net of cancellations, and is widely used in the travel business. International gross bookings reflect gross bookings generated principally by our Booking.com, agoda.comOur non-OTC brands (KAYAK and rentalcars.com businesses and domestic gross bookings reflect gross bookings generated principally by our priceline.comOpenTable) have different business in each case regardless of where the consumer resides, where the consumer is physically located while making a reservation or the location of the travel service provider or restaurant. We follow a similar approach for reporting the international and domestic revenue and gross profit ofmetrics from those businesses.
Gross bookings resulting from accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets reserved through our international and U.S. operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows (numbers may not total due to rounding):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
| International | $ | 43,639 |
| | $ | 33,300 |
| | 31.0 | % |
| Domestic | 6,661 |
| | 5,873 |
| | 13.4 | % |
| Total | $ | 50,300 |
| | $ | 39,173 |
| | 28.4 | % |
Gross bookings increased by 28.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013 (growth on a local currency basis was approximately 30%), principally due to growth of 27.9% in accommodation room night reservations, 3% growth on a local currency basis in accommodation ADRs, growth of 18.1% in rental car day reservations and 12.0% growth in airline ticket reservations. International gross bookings grew by 31.0% (growth on a local currency basis was approximately 33%) for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of growth in accommodation room night reservations for our Booking.com and agoda.com businesses, as well as growth in rental car day reservations for our rentalcars.com business. The U.S. Dollar significantly strengthened against the Euro during 2014, moving from an exchange rate of 1.38 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 1, 2014 to 1.21 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of December 31, 2014. The U.S. Dollar strengthened further in January 2015 to an exchange rate of 1.13 U.S. Dollars per Euro as of January 31, 2015. The U.S. Dollar has also strengthened against many other currencies since January 1, 2014. At these exchange rates, the growth of our totalOTC brands and internationaltherefore search queries through KAYAK and restaurant reservations through OpenTable do not contribute to our gross bookings, expressed in U.S. Dollars, will be significantly adversely impacted in 2015. We therefore believe that unit growth rates and total gross bookings, international gross bookings and gross profit growth on a local currency basis, excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, are important measures to understand the fundamental performance of the business.
Domestic gross bookings increased by 13.4% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to increases in priceline.com's retail airline ticket, retail hotel, Express Deals®hotel and retail rental car services, partially offset by declines in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price®reservation services. Travel service providers typically provide a limited amount of availability to opaque services like ours, especially during periods of healthy travel demand. As a result, the recent healthy travel environment in the United States has had an adverse impace on our access to availability for our opaque reservation services.bookings.
Gross bookings resulting from reservations of accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets made through our agency and merchant models for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were as follows (numbers may not total due to rounding):
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | | (in millions) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Agency | $ | 42,892 |
| | $ | 32,672 |
| | 31.3 | % | $ | 58,638 |
| | $ | 47,969 |
| | 22.2 | % |
| Merchant | 7,409 |
| | 6,501 |
| | 14.0 | % | 9,449 |
| | 7,559 |
| | 25.0 | % |
| Total | $ | 50,300 |
| | $ | 39,173 |
| | 28.4 | % | $ | 68,087 |
| | $ | 55,528 |
| | 22.6 | % |
Agency grossGross bookings increased 31.3%by 22.6% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily2015 (growth on a constant-currency basis was approximately 25%), principally due to growth of 28.7% in Booking.com accommodation room night reservations priceline.com's retailand growth of 11.2% in rental car day reservations, partially offset by the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, a slight decrease in accommodation ADRs (the decline on a constant-currency basis was less than 1%) and decreases in airfares and airline ticket rental carreservations. We believe that unit growth rates and hotel reservationtotal gross bookings and gross profit growth on a constant-currency basis, each of which exclude the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, are important measures to understand the fundamental performance of the business.
Agency gross bookings are derived from travel-related transactions where we do not facilitate payments for the travel services and rentalcars.com rental car reservation service. Merchantprovided. Agency gross bookings increased 14.0%by 22.2% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, primarily due to increasesgrowth in agoda.com hotelgross bookings from Booking.com agency retail accommodation room night reservations.
Merchant gross bookings are derived from services where we facilitate payments for the travel services provided. Merchant gross bookings increased by 25.0% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to growth in gross bookings from the merchant accommodation reservation services rentalcars.comfor Booking.com and agoda.com, the merchant rental car reservation servicesservice for Rentalcars.com and priceline.com Express Deals®hotel and retail hotelthe merchant airline ticket reservation services, partially offset by declines in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price®services.service for priceline.com.
Units sold for accommodationAccommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets reserved through our services for the years ended December 31, 20142016 and 20132015 were as follows:
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | | (in millions) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Room Nights | 346.0 |
| | 270.5 |
| | 27.9 | % | 556.6 |
| | 432.3 |
| | 28.7 | % |
| Rental Car Days | 51.8 |
| | 43.9 |
| | 18.1 | % | 66.6 |
| | 59.9 |
| | 11.2 | % |
| Airline Tickets | 7.8 |
| | 7.0 |
| | 12.0 | % | 7.3 |
| | 7.7 |
| | (5.2 | )% |
Accommodation room night reservations increased by 27.9%28.7% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, primarily due to an increase in Booking.com, agoda.com and priceline.comaccommodation room night reservations. Booking.com,strong execution by our most significant brand included over 600,000 properties on its website as of February 13, 2015, which included over 245,000 vacation rental properties, comparedteams to approximately 425,000 properties as of February 18, 2014, which included over 110,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are available on the Booking.com website). Booking.com has added properties over the past year in its core European market as well as higher-growth markets such as North America (which is a newer market for Booking.com), Asia-Pacific and South America. An increasing amount ofadd accommodations to our business from a destination and point-of-sale perspective is conducted in our newer markets which are growing faster than our overall growth rate and our core European market.websites,
advertise our brands to consumers and provide a continuously improving experience for customers on our desktop and mobile platforms.
Rental car day reservations increased by 18.1%11.2% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, due to an increase in price-disclosed rental car day reservations for rentalcars.com and priceline.com, partially offset by a decline in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® rental car reservation service.Rentalcars.com.
Airline ticket reservations increaseddecreased by 12.0%5.2% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, due to an increasea decline in price-disclosedpriceline.com's retail airline ticket reservations for priceline.com driven primarily by increased paid advertising placementsand the discontinuation on KAYAK (which began in the third quarterSeptember 1, 2016 of 2013), partially offset by a decline in priceline.com'spriceline.com’s Name Your Own Price® airline ticket reservation service.offering, partially offset by an increase in priceline.com's Express Deals® airline ticket reservations.
Revenues
We classify our revenue into three categories:
Agency revenues are derived from travel relatedtravel-related transactions where we aredo not the merchant of record and where the prices offacilitate payments for the travel services are determined by third parties.provided. Agency revenues includeconsist primarily of travel reservation commissions, as well as certain GDS reservation booking fees related to certainand travel services, travel insurance fees and customer processing fees, and are reported at the net amounts received, without any associated cost of revenue. Substantially all of the revenue for Booking.com is agency revenue comprised of travelaccommodation reservation commissions.
| |
| • | Merchant revenues are derived from services where we are the merchant of record and therefore charge the customer's credit cardfacilitate payments for the travel services provided. Merchant revenues include (1) transaction net revenues (i.e., the amount charged to a customer, less the amount charged to us by travel service providers) and travel reservation commissions in connection with (a) the accommodation reservations provided through our merchant retail accommodation reservation services at agoda.com, Booking.com and priceline.com and (b) the reservations provided through our merchant rental car service at Rentalcars.com and priceline.com’s Express Deals® reservation services; (2) transaction revenues representing the price of Name Your Own Price® hotel, rental carreservations charged to a customer (with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues); (3) ancillary fees, including damage excess waiver and airline ticket reservationstravel insurance fees and vacationcertain GDS reservation booking fees; and (4) customer processing fees charged in connection with (a) priceline.com's opaque reservation services and (b) the merchant retail accommodation reservation services at priceline.com and agoda.com. |
packages charged to a customer; (2) transaction revenues representing the amount charged to a customer, less the amount charged to us by travel service providers in connection with (a) the accommodation reservations provided through our merchant price-disclosed hotel reservation services at agoda.com and priceline.com and (b) the reservations provided through our merchant rental car service at rentalcars.com and merchant Express Deals® reservation services at priceline.com; (3) customer processing fees charged in connection with priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services, Express Deals® reservation services and merchant price-disclosed hotel reservation services; and (4) ancillary fees, including GDS reservation booking fees related to certain of the services listed above.
Advertising and other revenues are derived primarily from (1) revenues earned by KAYAK for (a) sending referrals to OTAsOTCs and travel service providers; (2)providers and (b) advertising placements on KAYAK's websites and mobile apps; (3) reservation(2) revenues earned by OpenTable (a fee for restaurant guests(a) reservation fees (fees paid by restaurants for diners seated through OpenTable's online reservation service); (4) and (b) subscription fees earned by OpenTable for restaurant reservation management services; (3) revenues earned by priceline.com for advertising on its websites; and (5)(4) revenues generated by Booking.com's hotelBookingSuite branded accommodation marketing and business analytics services. Revenue from KAYAK is net of intercompany revenues earned by KAYAK from other Priceline Group brands.
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Agency Revenues | $ | 5,845,802 |
| | $ | 4,410,689 |
| | 32.5 | % | $ | 7,982,116 |
| | $ | 6,527,898 |
| | 22.3 | % |
| Merchant Revenues | 2,186,054 |
| | 2,211,474 |
| | (1.1 | )% | 2,048,005 |
| | 2,082,973 |
| | (1.7 | )% |
| Advertising and Other Revenues | 410,115 |
| | 171,143 |
| | 139.6 | % | 712,885 |
| | 613,116 |
| | 16.3 | % |
| Total Revenues | $ | 8,441,971 |
| | $ | 6,793,306 |
| | 24.3 | % | $ | 10,743,006 |
| | $ | 9,223,987 |
| | 16.5 | % |
Agency Revenues
Agency revenues increased by 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased 32.5%2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, primarily as a result of growth in the business ofagency accommodation room night reservations at Booking.com. Our priceline.com agency revenues benefited from growth in our retail rental car, agency airline ticket and agency hotel reservation businesses.
Merchant Revenues
Merchant revenues decreased by 1.7% for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased 1.1%2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, primarily due to decreases in revenues from priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services, mostly
partially offset by increasesin our agoda.com business, rentalcars.com business, priceline.com's Express Deals®and retail merchant hotelprice-disclosed accommodation reservation services, particularly at Booking.com, as well as our merchant price-disclosed rental car and priceline.com'sairline ticket reservation services. On September 1, 2016, priceline.com’s Express DealsName Your Own Price® rental carairline ticket reservation services. Merchant revenue declined versus the prior year despite growth in merchant gross bookings, because our merchant revenues are disproportionately affected by priceline.com'soffering was discontinued. Our priceline.com Name Your Own Price® service. Name Your Own Price® revenues,reservation services, which declined year-over-year, are recorded "gross" with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues. Our other merchant revenues, and represented a smaller percentage,which in total grew year-over-year, of total revenues compared to our faster-growing agoda.com, rentalcars.com and priceline.com retail merchant hotel and Express Deals® reservation services, which are recorded in revenue "net" of travel service provider costs. As a result, we believe that gross profit is an important measurechanges in Name Your Own Price® reservation revenue disproportionately affect merchant revenues as compared to evaluate growth in our business.other merchant revenues.
Advertising and Other Revenues
Advertising and other revenues during the year ended December 31, 20142016 consisted primarily of advertising revenues, restaurant reservation revenues and subscription revenues for restaurant reservation management services. OtherAdvertising and other revenues increased by 16.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes $100.6 million of2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to growth in our KAYAK business, reservation fees at OpenTable, advertising revenue earned since its acquisition on July 24, 2014.at priceline.com and subscription revenue at OpenTable.
Cost of Revenues
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
| Cost of Revenues | $ | 857,841 |
| | $ | 1,077,420 |
| | (20.4 | )% |
Cost of Revenues |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Cost of Revenues | $ | 428,314 |
| | $ | 632,180 |
| | (32.2 | )% |
For the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, cost of revenues consisted primarily of: (1) the cost paid to travel service providers for priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and vacation package reservation services, net of applicable taxes and charges; and (2) fees paid to third parties by KAYAK and priceline.com to return travel itinerary information in response tofor consumer search queries; and (3) costs related to accruals for travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.).queries. Cost of revenues decreased by 32.2% for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased by 20.4%,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, primarily due to a decrease in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes an accrual2016 was positively impacted by a reduction of travel transaction taxes of $5.1 million recorded in the third quarter of 2016 related to a cash refund from the State of Hawaii based on a favorable ruling in the first quarter of 2015. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 was positively impacted by a reversal of previously accrued travel transaction taxes of $16.4 million (including estimated interest and penalties) recorded in the first quarter of 20132015 and a reduction of approximately $20.5travel transaction taxes of $13.7 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes,recorded in the third quarter of 2015, principally related to unfavorable rulings ina cash refund from the State of Hawaii, andin both cases based on the District of Columbia, partially offset by a reduction in our accrual related to travel transaction taxes of $6.3 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013, principally related to aaforementioned favorable agreement and ruling in the District of Columbia.ruling.
Agency revenues have no cost of revenue. Agency revenues principally consist of travel commissions on accommodation reservations.
Gross Profit
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Gross Profit | $ | 7,584,130 |
| | $ | 5,715,886 |
| | 32.7 | % | $ | 10,314,692 |
| | $ | 8,591,807 |
| | 20.1 | % |
| Gross Margin | 89.8 | % | | 84.1 | % | | |
| 96.0 | % | | 93.1 | % | | |
|
Total gross profit increased by 20.1% for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased by 32.7%2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 20132015 (growth on a local currencyconstant-currency basis was approximately 34%23%), primarily as a result of the increased revenue discussed above. Total gross margin (gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue) increased during the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2015, because our revenues are disproportionately affected by priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services. Name Your Own Price® revenues are recorded "gross" with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues, and in the year ended December 31, 20142016 these revenues represented a smaller percentage of total revenues than in the year ended December 31, 2013.2015. Our retail and semi-opaqueprice-disclosed reservation services, which are recorded in revenue "net" of travel service provider costs, have been growing and priceline.com's Name Your Own Price®reservation services have been declining. As a result, we believe that gross profit is an important measure for evaluating growth in our business.
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was positively impacted by a reduction of travel transaction taxes of $5.1 million recorded in the third quarter of 2016 related to a cash refund from the State of Hawaii based on a favorable ruling in the first quarter of 2015. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2015 was positively impacted by a reversal of previously accrued travel transaction taxes of $16.4 million (including estimated interest and penalties) recorded in the first quarter of 2015 and a reduction of travel transaction taxes of $13.7 million (including estimated interest and penalties) recorded in the third quarter of 2015, principally related to a cash refund from the State of Hawaii, in both cases based on the aforementioned favorable ruling.
Gross profit as a percentage of gross bookings was 15.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease is due in part to the timing of booking versus travel resulting from the impact of accelerating gross bookings growth in the year ended December 31, 2016 and an expanding booking window (a lengthening of the average time between the making of a travel reservation and the travel). Other contributing factors to the variance are business mix impacts and the use of discounted closed user group rates.
Our international operations accounted for approximately $9.1 billion of our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $7.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. Gross profit attributable to our international operations increased by 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 (growth on a constant-currency basis was approximately 25%). Gross profit attributable to our U.S. businesses increased by 5.7% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 due to growth in gross profit for the U.S. businesses of KAYAK and OpenTable, partially offset by a decrease in gross profit for priceline.com resulting from higher favorable travel transaction tax adjustments recorded in 2015 as compared to 2016.
Operating Expenses
Advertising
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Performance Advertising | $ | 3,479,287 |
| | $ | 2,738,218 |
| | 27.1 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 33.7 | % | | 31.9 | % | | |
|
| Brand Advertising | $ | 295,698 |
| | $ | 273,704 |
| | 8.0 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 2.9 | % | | 3.2 | % | | |
|
Performance advertising expenses consist primarily of the costs of (1) search engine keyword purchases; (2) referrals from meta-search and travel research websites; (3) affiliate programs; and (4) other performance-based advertisements. For the year ended December 31, 2016, performance advertising expenses increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily to generate increased gross bookings and gross profit. Performance advertising as a percentage of gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 due to growth of paid traffic channels, a year-over-year decline in advertising ROIs and timing of booking versus travel resulting from acceleration in gross bookings growth during the year.
Brand advertising expenses are primarily related to our Booking.com, KAYAK, priceline.com and agoda.com businesses and consist mainly of television advertising, online video advertising (including the airing of our television advertising online) and online display advertising. For the year ended December 31, 2016, brand advertising expenses increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to increased online video and television advertising, including associated production costs, at Booking.com, partially offset by lower television advertising at KAYAK and priceline.com.
In January 2016, we changed the presentation of advertising expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Sales and Marketing
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Sales and Marketing | $ | 435,225 |
| | $ | 353,221 |
| | 23.2 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.2 | % | | 4.1 | % | | |
|
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of (1) credit card and other payment processing fees associated with merchant transactions; (2) fees paid to third parties that provide call center, website content translations and other services; (3) customer relations costs; (4) provisions for customer chargebacks associated with merchant transactions; (5) provisions for bad debt, primarily related to agency accommodation commission receivables; and (6) promotional and trade show costs. For the year ended December 31, 2016, sales and marketing expenses, which are substantially variable in nature, increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 due primarily to increased transaction volumes and a higher provision for customer chargebacks associated with merchant transactions.
Personnel
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Personnel | $ | 1,350,032 |
| | $ | 1,166,226 |
| | 15.8 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 13.1 | % | | 13.6 | % | | |
|
Personnel expenses consist of compensation to our personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, bonuses, payroll taxes, and employee health and other benefits. Personnel expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, due primarily to increased headcount to support the growth of our businesses.
General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| General and Administrative | $ | 455,909 |
| | $ | 415,420 |
| | 9.7 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.4 | % | | 4.8 | % | | |
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of: (1) occupancy and office expenses; (2) personnel-related expenses such as travel, recruiting and training expenses; and (3) fees for outside professionals, including litigation expenses. General and administrative expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, due primarily to higher occupancy and office expenses related to the expansion of our international businesses, higher fees for outside professionals and higher personnel-related expenses related to increased headcount in our businesses. These increases were partially offset by $7.7 million of expense recognized in 2015 for a fair value adjustment to the contingent liability related to an acquisition.
Information Technology
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Information Technology | $ | 142,393 |
| | $ | 113,617 |
| | 25.3 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 1.4 | % | | 1.3 | % | | |
|
Information technology expenses consist primarily of: (1) software license and system maintenance fees; (2) data communications and other expenses associated with operating our services; (3) outsourced data center costs; and (4) payments to outside consultants. Information technology expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, due primarily to growth in our worldwide operations.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 309,135 |
| | $ | 272,494 |
| | 13.4 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 3.0 | % | | 3.2 | % | | |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of: (1) amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives; (2) depreciation on computer equipment; (3) depreciation of internally developed and purchased software; and (4) depreciation of leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures and office equipment. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of increased depreciation expenses due to capital expenditures for additional data center capacity and office build-outs to support growth and geographic expansion, as well as increased capitalized software development costs.
Impairment of Goodwill
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Impairment of Goodwill | $ | 940,700 |
| | $ | — |
| | N/A |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 9.1 | % | | — | % | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge for goodwill related to OpenTable, which is not tax deductible, of $940.7 million (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations).
Other Income (Expense)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Interest Income | $ | 94,946 |
| | $ | 55,729 |
| | 70.4 | % |
| Interest Expense | (207,900 | ) | | (160,229 | ) | | 29.8 | % |
| Foreign Currency Transactions and Other | (16,913 | ) | | (26,087 | ) | | (35.2 | )% |
| Impairment of Cost-method Investments | (63,208 | ) | | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Total | $ | (193,075 | ) | | $ | (130,587 | ) | | 47.9 | % |
For the year ended December 31, 2016, interest income on cash and marketable securities increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to an increase in the average invested balance and higher yields. Interest
expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily due to interest expense attributable to our Senior Notes issued in March 2015, November 2015 and May 2016, partially offset by the maturity of our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes in March 2015. See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
"Foreign currency transactions and other" includes foreign exchange gains or losses on derivative contracts, foreign exchange transaction gains or losses, including costs related to foreign exchange transactions, and net realized gains or losses on investments.
Derivative contracts that hedge our exposure to the impact of currency fluctuations on the translation of our international operating results into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation resulted in foreign exchange gains of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to foreign exchange losses of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Foreign exchange transaction losses, including costs related to foreign exchange transactions, resulted in foreign exchange losses of $19.6 million and $21.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Foreign exchange losses for the year ended December 31, 2015 included approximately $5.7 million of hedging cost and a foreign exchange loss related to the devaluation of the Argentine Peso.
For the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we recognized $1.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of net realized gains related to investments.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized impairments of $63.2 million, most of which was not tax deductible, related to cost-method investments (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
| Income Tax Expense | $ | 578,251 |
| | $ | 576,960 |
| | 0.2 | % |
Our effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were 21.3% and 18.4%, respectively. Our 2016 effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%, due to lower international tax rates, partially offset by the non-deductible impairment charge for goodwill of $940.7 million related to OpenTable recognized in 2016 (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and the non-deductible impairment of our cost-method investment in Hotel Urbano recognized in 2016 (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). Our 2015 effective tax rate differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate as a result of lower international tax rates, partially offset by U.S. state income taxes.
The non-deductible impairment charges referred to above have caused our effective tax rate to be higher for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase has been partially offset by the favorable impact of an increased proportion of our income being taxed at lower international tax rates due to the growth of our international businesses and the tax benefits recorded in 2016 arising from U.S. state tax law changes resulting in a net decrease to deferred tax liabilities, mostly associated with acquired intangible assets.
A portion of Booking.com's earnings during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 qualified for Innovation Box Tax treatment, which had a significant beneficial impact on the Company's effective tax rate for those periods. While we expect Booking.com to continue to qualify for Innovation Box Tax treatment with respect to a portion of its earnings for the foreseeable future, the loss of the Innovation Box Tax benefit, whether due to a change in tax law or a determination by the Dutch government that Booking.com's activities are not "innovative" or for any other reason, would substantially increase our effective tax rate and adversely impact our results of operations. See Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "We may not be able to maintain our 'Innovation Box Tax' benefit."
Until our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards are utilized or expire, most of our U.S. income will not be subject to a cash tax liability, other than U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and state income taxes. However, we expect to pay foreign taxes on our international income except in countries where we have net operating loss carryforwards. We expect that our international operations will grow their pretax income faster than our U.S. businesses over the long term and, therefore, it is our expectation that our cash tax payments will increase as our international businesses generate an increasing share of our pretax income and as our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards are utilized or expire.
As of December 31, 2016, we held approximately $12.6 billion of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments outside of the United States. We intend to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of our international subsidiaries outside of the United States. If that intention changes and we decide to repatriate that cash to the United States, whether due to cash needs in the United States or otherwise, we would incur related U.S. income tax expense, but we would only make income tax payments when we repatriate the cash. We would pay only U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and U.S. state income taxes as long as we have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset our U.S. taxable income. As of December 31, 2016, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $727.8 million and $583.9 million for U.S. federal and state tax purposes, respectively. If our foreign earnings were repatriated, we could be subject to a cash income tax liability on the earnings of our U.S. businesses sooner than would otherwise have been the case. After our net operating loss carryforwards have been fully utilized or expire, foreign tax credits associated with the repatriation of international cash may be used to reduce U.S. federal taxes on the repatriation.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2015 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014
Operating and Statistical Metrics
Gross bookings resulting from reservations of accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets made through our agency and merchant models for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (numbers may not total due to rounding):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Agency | $ | 47,969 |
| | $ | 42,892 |
| | 11.8 | % |
| Merchant | 7,559 |
| | 7,409 |
| | 2.0 | % |
| Total | $ | 55,528 |
| | $ | 50,300 |
| | 10.4 | % |
Gross bookings increased by 10.4% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 (growth on a constant-currency basis was approximately 25%), principally due to growth of 24.9% in accommodation room night reservations, 2% growth on a constant-currency basis in ADRs and growth of 15.6% in rental car day reservations, partially offset by the impact foreign exchange rate fluctuations. We believe that unit growth rates and total gross bookings and gross profit growth on a constant-currency basis, each of which exclude the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, are important measures to understand the fundamental performance of the business.
Agency gross bookings are derived from travel-related transactions where we do not facilitate payments for the travel services provided. Agency gross bookings increased 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to growth in gross bookings from Booking.com agency accommodation room night reservations, as well as growth in gross bookings by priceline.com and Rentalcars.com agency retail rental car reservation services, and priceline.com and agoda.com agency retail hotel reservation services, partially offset by lower retail airfares.
Merchant gross bookings are derived from services where we facilitate payments for the travel services provided. Merchant gross bookings increased 2.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to increases in gross bookings by merchant retail hotel reservation services for Booking.com and priceline.com, Rentalcars.com's rental car reservation service, and priceline.com's Express Deals®hotel reservation service as well as the inclusion of our Rocketmiles hotel reservation service since its acquisition in February 2015.These increases were partially offset by declines in gross bookings by priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services and the impact of the stronger U.S. Dollar on agoda.com's merchant retail hotel reservation service. The U.S. Dollar was significantly stronger against the Euro and many other currencies throughout 2015 compared to 2014, which significantly adversely affected the growth of our agency and merchant gross bookings, expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets reserved through our services for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Room Nights | 432.3 |
| | 346.0 |
| | 24.9 | % |
| Rental Car Days | 59.9 |
| | 51.8 |
| | 15.6 | % |
| Airline Tickets | 7.7 |
| | 7.8 |
| | (1.6 | )% |
Accommodation room night reservations increased by 24.9% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, due to an increase in Booking.com, agoda.com and priceline.comaccommodation room night reservations and the inclusion of Rocketmiles accommodation room night reservations since its acquisition in February 2015. Booking.com included over 850,000 properties on its website as of February 15, 2016, which included approximately 390,000 vacation rental properties (updated property counts are available on the Booking.com website), compared to over 635,000 properties (including approximately 269,000 vacation rental properties) a year ago. In September 2015, Booking.com changed the way it calculates property counts. As a result, properties that are contracted with Booking.com but temporarily do not have availability on Booking.com (for example properties that are closed during their off-peak season or for renovations) will remain
included in Booking.com's property counts during these temporary periods. Booking.com previously excluded properties that were temporarily unavailable for booking. We believe that continuously including them provides a more consistent and useful property count.
Rental car day reservations increased by 15.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, due to an increase in price-disclosed rental car day reservations for Rentalcars.com and priceline.com, partially offset by a decline in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® rental car day reservations.
Airline ticket reservations decreased by 1.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, due to a decline in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® airline ticket reservations.
Revenues
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Agency Revenues | $ | 6,527,898 |
| | $ | 5,845,802 |
| | 11.7 | % |
| Merchant Revenues | 2,082,973 |
| | 2,186,054 |
| | (4.7 | )% |
| Advertising and Other Revenues | 613,116 |
| | 410,115 |
| | 49.5 | % |
| Total Revenues | $ | 9,223,987 |
| | $ | 8,441,971 |
| | 9.3 | % |
Agency Revenues
Agency revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased 11.7% compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of growth in the business of Booking.com, the agency rental car businesses of Rentalcars.com and priceline.com and the agency hotel businesses of priceline.com and agoda.com. The U.S. Dollar was significantly stronger against the Euro and many other currencies throughout 2015 compared to 2014, which significantly adversely affected the growth of our agency revenues, expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Merchant Revenues
Merchant revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased 4.7% compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to decreases in revenues from priceline.com's Name Your Own Price®hotel, airline ticket and rental car reservation services, partially offset by increases in our merchant price-disclosed hotel and rental car businesses. Our priceline.com Name Your Own Price® reservation services, which declined year-over-year, are recorded "gross" with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues. Our other merchant revenues, which in total grew year-over-year, are recorded in revenue "net" of travel service provider costs. As a result, changes in Name Your Own Price® reservation revenue disproportionately affect merchant revenues as compared to our other merchant revenues. The U.S. Dollar was significantly stronger against the Euro and many other currencies throughout 2015 compared to 2014, which significantly adversely affected the growth of our merchant revenues, expressed in U.S. Dollars.
Advertising and Other Revenues
Advertising and other revenues during the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted primarily of advertising revenues, restaurant reservation revenues and subscription revenues for restaurant reservation management services. Advertising and other revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased 49.5% compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of the inclusion of a full year of OpenTable revenues in 2015 compared to only a partial year's results in 2014, as well as growth in our KAYAK business.
Cost of Revenues
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Cost of Revenues | $ | 632,180 |
| | $ | 857,841 |
| | (26.3 | )% |
For the year ended December 31, 2015, cost of revenues consisted primarily of: (1) the cost paid to travel service providers for priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and vacation package reservation services, net of applicable taxes and charges; and (2) fees paid to third parties by KAYAK and priceline.com to return travel itinerary information for consumer search queries. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015 decreased by 26.3%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to a decrease in priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services. For the year ended December 31, 2015, cost of revenue benefited from a reversal of previously accrued travel transaction taxes of $16.4 million (including estimated interest and penalties) recorded in the first quarter of 2015 related to a favorable ruling in the State of Hawaii. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized a net reduction in cost of revenue in the third quarter of 2015 of $13.7 million related to travel transaction taxes, principally due to a cash refund from the State of Hawaii for the aforementioned favorable ruling.
Agency revenues have no cost of revenue.
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Gross Profit | $ | 8,591,807 |
| | $ | 7,584,130 |
| | 13.3 | % |
| Gross Margin | 93.1 | % | | 89.8 | % | | |
|
Total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased by 13.3% compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 (growth on a constant-currency basis was approximately 27%), primarily as a result of the increased revenue discussed above. Total gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) increased during the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, because our revenues are disproportionately affected by priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services. Name Your Own Price® revenues are recorded "gross" with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues, and in the year ended December 31, 2015 these revenues represented a smaller percentage of total revenues than in the year ended December 31, 2014. Our price-disclosed reservation services, which are recorded in revenue "net" of travel service provider costs, have been growing faster than priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® reservation services. As a result, we believe that gross profit is an important measure to evaluatefor evaluating growth in our business.
Our international operations accounted for approximately $6.6$7.4 billion of our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2014, which compares2015, compared to $5.0$6.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. Gross profit attributable to our international operations increased on a local currency basis, by approximately 34%11.6% for the year ended December 31, 20142015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (growth on a constant-currency basis was approximately 28%). Gross profit attributable to our U.S. businesses increased by approximately 35.4%25.0% for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 20142015 was positively impacted by the inclusion of OpenTable, and KAYAK since their acquisitionswhich benefited year-over-year comparisons through the anniversary of the acquisition on July 24, 20142015. In addition, gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2015 was positively impacted by a reversal of previously accrued travel transaction taxes of $16.4 million (including estimated interest and May 21, 2013, respectively.penalties) recorded in the first quarter of 2015 related to a favorable ruling in the State of Hawaii. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 20132015 was negativelyalso positively impacted by an accrual recordeda net reduction in cost of revenue in the firstthird quarter of 20132015 of approximately $20.5$13.7 million (including estimated interest and penalties) forrelated to travel transaction taxes, principally relateddue to unfavorable rulings ina cash refund from the State of Hawaii andfor the District of Columbia, partially offset by a credit in the fourth quarter of 2013 of $6.3 million, principally related to aaforementioned favorable agreement and ruling in the District of Columbia.ruling.
The U.S. Dollar iswas significantly stronger against the Euro and many other currencies as of January 31,throughout 2015 compared to 2014. At these exchange rates, the growth of our total and international gross bookings, expressed in U.S. Dollars, will bewas significantly adversely impacted in 2015.
Operating Expenses
Advertising
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Online Advertising | $ | 2,360,221 |
| | $ | 1,798,645 |
| | 31.2 | % | |
| Performance Advertising | | $ | 2,738,218 |
| | $ | 2,334,453 |
| | 17.3 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 31.1 | % | | 31.5 | % | | |
| 31.9 | % | | 30.8 | % | | |
|
| Offline Advertising | $ | 231,309 |
| | $ | 127,459 |
| | 81.5 | % | |
| Brand Advertising | | $ | 273,704 |
| | $ | 257,077 |
| | 6.5 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 3.0 | % | | 2.2 | % | | |
| 3.2 | % | | 3.4 | % | | |
|
OnlinePerformance advertising expenses consist primarily consist of the costs of (1) search engine keyword purchases; (2) referrals from meta-search and travel research websites; (3) affiliate programs; and (4) banner, pop-up and other Internet and mobile advertisements. For the year ended December 31, 2014, online2015, performance advertising expenses increased 31.2%17.3%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, primarily due to increased spending on online performance marketing to generate increased gross bookings. OnlinePerformance advertising as a percentage of gross profit for the year ended December 31, 20142015 benefited from the inclusion of KAYAK and OpenTable because they spendOpenTable spends a lower percentage of gross profit on onlineperformance advertising thanrelative to our other brands. Also, our consolidated results exclude intercompany advertising by our brands on KAYAK since the acquisition on May 21, 2013. In addition, the share of our business coming directly to our websites with no associated onlineperformance advertising expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. These favorable impacts were almost entirelymore than offset for the year ended December 31, 20142015 by (1) a year-over-year decline in advertising ROIs and (2) brand mix within The Priceline Group as Booking.com, agoda.com and rentalcars.com grew faster than priceline.com and typically spend a higher percentage of gross profit on online advertising, trends that we expect to continue. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was negatively impacted by an accrual recorded in the first quarter of 2013 of approximately $20.5 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes, principally related to unfavorable rulings in the State of Hawaii and the District of Columbia, partially offset by a reduction in our accrual related to travel transaction taxes of $6.3 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013, principally related to a favorable agreement and ruling in the District of Columbia.ROIs.
OfflineBrand advertising expenses are primarily related to our Booking.com, KAYAK and priceline.com businesses and primarily consist of television advertising. For the year ended December 31, 2014, offline2015, brand advertising increased 81.5%6.5% compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, primarily due to the launch of offlineincreased online video and television advertising, campaignsincluding associated production costs, at Booking.com, partially offset by Booking.com in Germany, the United Kingdomlower television advertising at KAYAK and, Canada in 2014 and Australia in the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as incremental offline advertising by KAYAK. Offline advertising growth for the year ended December 31, 2014 was also impacted by the inclusion of KAYAK in our consolidated results since its acquisition on May 21, 2013.to a lesser extent, priceline.com.
Sales and Marketing
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Sales and Marketing | $ | 310,910 |
| | $ | 235,817 |
| | 31.8 | % | $ | 353,221 |
| | $ | 310,910 |
| | 13.6 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.1 | % | | 4.1 | % | | |
| 4.1 | % | | 4.1 | % | | |
|
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of (1) credit card and other payment processing fees associated with merchant transactions; (2) fees paid to third parties that provide call center, website content translations and other services; (3) provisions for credit card chargebacks; andcustomer relations costs; (4) public relations costs; (5) provisions for bad debt, primarily related to agency accommodation commission receivables.receivables; and (6) provisions for customer chargebacks. For the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, sales and marketing expenses, which are substantially variable in nature, increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014 due primarily due to increased gross booking volumes, higher publiccustomer relations costs and the inclusion of OpenTable since its acquisition on July 24, 2014. Sales and marketing expensesa full year of OpenTable's results as a percentage of gross profit are typically higher for our merchant businesses, which incur credit card processing fees. Our merchant business grew more slowly than our agency business, and as a result, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2014 were favorably impacted compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. This impact was offset during the year ended December 31, 2014 by the inclusion of OpenTableonly a partial year's results in our consolidated results since its acquisition on July 24, 2014 because OpenTable spends a higher percentage of gross profit on sales and marketing than our agency businesses.2014.
Personnel
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Personnel | $ | 950,191 |
| | $ | 698,692 |
| | 36.0 | % | $ | 1,166,226 |
| | $ | 950,191 |
| | 22.7 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 12.5 | % | | 12.2 | % | | |
| 13.6 | % | | 12.5 | % | | |
|
Personnel expenses consist of compensation to our personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, bonuses, payroll taxes and employee health benefits. Personnel expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, due primarily to increased headcount to support the growth of our businesses. TheAdditionally, the inclusion of OpenTable and KAYAKa full year of OpenTable's results in our 2015 consolidated results since their acquisitions on July 24,as compared to only a partial year's results in 2014 and May 21, 2013, respectively, contributed to thisthe increase in personnel expenses.
Stock-based compensation expense was approximately $186.4 millionexpenses for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015 compared to $140.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes charges amounting to $20.6 million and $24.1 million, respectively, representing the impact of adjusting the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period for outstanding unvested performance share units. Stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 also includes $26.5 million of compensation expense related to 2014 acquisitions.
In December 2013, the Dutch Government enacted certain amendments to Dutch tax law including a one-time irrevocable levy on an employer applied to employee earnings, equal to 16% of an employee's earnings in excess of 150,000 Euros. This levy resulted in additional payroll taxes recorded in personnel expense of approximately $12 million (approximately $9 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of 2013. There was no similar tax levy in 2014.
General and Administrative
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| General and Administrative | $ | 352,869 |
| | $ | 252,994 |
| | 39.5 | % | $ | 415,420 |
| | $ | 352,869 |
| | 17.7 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.7 | % | | 4.4 | % | | |
| 4.8 | % | | 4.7 | % | | |
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of: (1) occupancy and office expenses; (2) personnel relatedpersonnel-related expenses such as travel, recruiting and training expenses; and (3) fees for outside professionals, including litigation expenses. General and administrative expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, due primarily to higher occupancy and office expenses related to the expansion of our international businesses and higher personnel relatedpersonnel-related expenses related to increased headcount in all of our businesses. TheAdditionally, the inclusion of OpenTable and KAYAKa full year of OpenTable's results in our 2015 consolidated results since their acquisitions on July 24,as compared to only a partial year's results in 2014 and May 21, 2013, respectively, contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 20142015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 included approximately $6.9 million of professional fees related to consummated acquisitions. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 included approximately $8.5 million of professional fees related to the acquisition of KAYAK.
Information Technology
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Information Technology | $ | 97,498 |
| | $ | 71,890 |
| | 35.6 | % | $ | 113,617 |
| | $ | 97,498 |
| | 16.5 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 1.3 | % | | 1.3 | % | | |
| 1.3 | % | | 1.3 | % | | |
|
Information technology expenses consist primarily of: (1) software license and system maintenance fees; (2) data communications and other expenses associated with operating our services; (3) outsourced data center costs; and (4) payments to outside consultants. Information technology expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, due primarily to growth in our worldwide operations. TheAdditionally, the inclusion of OpenTable and KAYAKa full year of OpenTable's results in our 2015 consolidated results since their acquisitions on July 24,as compared to only a partial year's results in 2014 and May 21, 2013, respectively, contributed to the increase in information technology expenses for the year ended December 31, 20142015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.2014.
Depreciation and Amortization
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 207,820 |
| | $ | 117,975 |
| | 76.2 | % | $ | 272,494 |
| | $ | 207,820 |
| | 31.1 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 2.7 | % | | 2.1 | % | | |
| 3.2 | % | | 2.7 | % | | |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of: (1) amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives; (2) depreciation on computer equipment; (3) depreciation of internally developed and purchased software; and (4) depreciation of leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures and office equipment. For the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, depreciation and amortization expense increased, fromcompared to the year ended December 31, 20132014, due primarily to increased intangible amortization from the OpenTable and KAYAK acquisitionsacquisition and increased depreciation expense due to capital expenditures for additional data center capacity and office build outsbuild-outs to support growth and geographic expansion, principally related to our Booking.com business.
business. Additionally, the inclusion of OpenTable in our consolidated results since its acquisition on July 24, 2014 contributed to the increase in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.
Other Income (Expense)
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Interest Income | $ | 13,933 |
| | $ | 4,167 |
| | 234.4 | % | $ | 55,729 |
| | $ | 13,933 |
| | 300.0 | % |
| Interest Expense | (88,353 | ) | | (83,289 | ) | | 6.1 | % | (160,229 | ) | | (88,353 | ) | | 81.4 | % |
| Foreign Currency Transactions and Other | (9,444 | ) | | (36,755 | ) | | (74.3 | )% | (26,087 | ) | | (9,444 | ) | | 176.2 | % |
| Total | $ | (83,864 | ) | | $ | (115,877 | ) | | (27.6 | )% | $ | (130,587 | ) | | $ | (83,864 | ) | | 55.7 | % |
For the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, interest income on cash and marketable securities increased compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, primarily due to an increase in the average invested balance and higher yields. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, primarily due to interest expense attributable to our Senior Notes issued in August 2014, and September 2014, March 2015 and interest expense attributable to our Senior Convertible Notes issued in May 2013,November 2015, partially offset by early conversionsthe maturity of our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes duein March 2015. See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Derivative contracts that hedge our exposure to the impact of currency fluctuations on the translation of our international operating results into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation resulted in foreign exchange losses of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to foreign exchange gains of $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with foreign exchange gains of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, whichand are recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" onin the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Foreign exchange transaction losses, including costs related to foreign exchange transactions, resulted in losses of $21.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, which includes approximately $5.7 million of hedging cost and a foreign exchange loss recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015 related to the devaluation of the Argentine Peso, compared to foreign exchange losses of $17.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to foreign exchange transaction losses of $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013,and are recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" onin the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
DuringFor the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, we delivered cash of $122.9 million to repay the aggregate principal amount and issued 300,256 shares of our common stock and paid cash ofrecognized $2.2 million of net realized gains related to investments, which are recorded in satisfaction"Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statement of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount associated with our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2015 that were converted prior to maturity. Operations.
The conversion of our convertible debt prior to maturity resulted in a non-cash loss of $6.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to aresulted in non-cash losslosses of $26.7$6.3 million, for the year ended December 31, 2013, which isare recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" onin the Consolidated StatementsStatement of Operations.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
| Income Tax Expense | $ | 567,695 |
| | $ | 403,739 |
| | 40.6 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | Change |
| Income Tax Expense | $ | 576,960 |
| | $ | 567,695 |
| | 1.6 | % |
Our effective tax rates expressed as income tax expense as a percentage of earnings before income taxes, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were 18.4% and 2013 were 19.0% and 17.6%, respectively. Our effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%, due to lower tax rates outside the United States, partially offset by U.S. state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses. Our effective tax rate was higherlower for the year ended December 31, 2014,2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to the acquisitions of OpenTable on July 24, 2014, and KAYAK on May 21, 2013, both of which are principally taxed at the higher U.S. tax rates.
Under Dutch corporate income tax law, income generated from qualifying "innovative" activities is taxed at a rate of 5% ("Innovation Box Tax") rather than the Dutch statutory rate of 25%. Booking.com obtained a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities confirming that a portion of its earnings is eligible for Innovation Box Tax treatment. The ruling from the Dutch tax authorities is valid through December 31, 2017.
Until our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards are utilized or expire, most of our U.S. income will not be subject to a cash tax liability, other than federal alternative minimum tax and state income taxes. However, we expect to pay foreign taxes on our non-U.S. income except in countries where we have operating loss carryforwards. We expect that our international operations will grow their pretax income faster than the U.S. business over the long term and, therefore, it is our expectation that our cash tax payments will increase as our international businesses generate an increasing share of our pre-tax income.
We will be subject to increased income taxes in the event that our cash balances held outside the United States are remitted to the United States. As of December 31, 2014, we held approximately $6.9 billion of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments outside of the United States. We currently intend to use our cash held outside the United States to reinvest in our non-U.S. operations. If our cash balances outside the United States continue to grow and our ability to reinvest those balances outside the United States diminishes, it will become increasingly likely that we will be subject to additional income tax expense in the United States with respect to our unremitted non-U.S. earnings. We would not make additional income tax payments unless we were to actually repatriate our international cash to the United States. We would pay only U.S. federal alternative minimum tax and certain U.S. state income taxes as long as we have net operating loss carryforwards available to offset our U.S. taxable income. This could result in us being subject to a cash income tax liability on the earnings of our U.S. businesses sooner than would otherwise have been the case.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Change |
| Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | $ | — |
| | $ | 135 |
| | NA |
We purchased the remaining outstanding shares underlying the redeemable noncontrolling interests in April 2013.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2013 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012
Operating and Statistical Metrics
Gross bookings resulting from accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets reserved through our international and U.S. operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (numbers may not total due to rounding):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| International | $ | 33,300 |
| | $ | 23,370 |
| | 42.5 | % |
| Domestic | 5,873 |
| | 5,086 |
| | 15.5 | % |
| Total | $ | 39,173 |
| | $ | 28,456 |
| | 37.7 | % |
Gross bookings increased by 37.7% for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012 (growth on a local currency basis was approximately 38%), principally due to growth of 36.9% in accommodation room night reservations and growth of 37.0% in rental car day reservations. The 42.5% increase in international gross bookings (growth on a local currency basis was approximately 42%) was primarily attributable to growth in hotel and accommodation room night reservations for our Booking.com and agoda.com businesses, as well as growth in rental car day reservations for our rentalcars.com business. Domestic gross bookings increased by 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to an increase in priceline.com's retail airline ticket service, Express Deals®hotel reservation service, and retail rental car service, partially offset by a decline in our Name Your Own Price®opaque hotel reservation service (driven in part by customer shift to Express Deals®).
Gross bookings resulting from reservations of accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets made through our agency and merchant models for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows (numbers may not total due to rounding):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Agency | $ | 32,672 |
| | $ | 23,284 |
| | 40.3 | % |
| Merchant | 6,501 |
| | 5,172 |
| | 25.7 | % |
| Total | $ | 39,173 |
| | $ | 28,456 |
| | 37.7 | % |
Agency gross bookings increased 40.3% for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to growth in Booking.com accommodation room night reservations, as well as growth in priceline.com's retail airline ticket and rental car services. Merchant gross bookings increased 25.7% for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the sale of agoda.com accommodation room night reservations, priceline.com Express Deals®hotel room night reservations, rentalcars.com rental car day reservations and Name Your Own Price®airline ticket reservations, partially offset by a decline in our Name Your Own Price®opaque hotel reservation service.
Units sold for accommodation room nights, rental car days and airline tickets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in millions) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Room Nights | 270.5 |
| | 197.5 |
| | 36.9 | % |
| Rental Car Days | 43.9 |
| | 32.0 |
| | 37.0 | % |
| Airline Tickets | 7.0 |
| | 6.4 |
| | 9.1 | % |
Accommodation room night reservations increased by 36.9% for the year ended December 31, 2013, over the same period in 2012, principally due to an increase in Booking.com, agoda.com and priceline.com Express Deals®and retailaccommodation room night reservations, partially offset by a decline in our Name Your Own Price® opaque hotel room night reservations in part due to a concerted effort to emphasize Express Deals® over Name Your Own Price® in our offline advertising campaigns. Booking.com, our most significant brand, includes over 425,000 properties on its website as compared to about 275,000 properties last year (updated property counts are available on the Booking.com website). Booking.com has added properties over the past year in its core European market as well as higher-growth markets such as North America (which is a newer market for Booking.com), Asia-Pacific and South America. An increasing amountproportion of our business from a destination and point-of-sale perspective is conducted in these newer markets which are growing faster than our overall growth rate and our core European market. Our priceline.com agency hotel reservations benefited from the integrationincome being taxed at lower international tax rates. A portion of the growing number of properties on the Booking.com extranet.
Rental car day reservations increased by 37.0% for the year ended December 31, 2013, over the same period in 2012, due to an increase in rental car day reservations for rentalcars.com and priceline.com.
Airline ticket reservations increased by 9.1% for the year ended December 31, 2013, over the same period in 2012, due to an increase in Name Your Own Price®and price-disclosed airline ticket reservations.
Revenues
We classify our revenue into three categories:
Agency revenues are derived from travel related transactions where we are not the merchant of record and where the prices of the travel services are determined by third parties. Agency revenues include travel commissions, GDS reservation booking fees related to certain travel services and customer processing fees and are reported at the net amounts received, without any associated cost of revenue. Substantially all of the revenue for Booking.com is agency revenue comprised of travel commissions.
| |
• | Merchant revenues are derived from services where we are the merchant of record and therefore charge the customer's credit card for the travel services provided. Merchant revenues include (1) transaction revenues representing the selling price of Name Your Own Price® hotel room night, rental car and airline ticket reservations and vacation packages; (2) transaction revenues representing the amount charged to a customer, less the amount charged by travel service providers in connection with (a) the accommodation room reservations provided through our merchant price-disclosed hotel service at agoda.com and priceline.com and (b) the reservations provided through our merchant rental car service at rentalcars.com and merchant Express Deals® hotel service at priceline.com, which allows customers to see the price of the reservation prior to purchase but not the identity of the travel service provider; (3) customer processing fees charged in connection with the sale of Name Your Own Price® hotel room night, rental car and airline ticket reservations and merchant price-disclosed hotel reservations; and (4) ancillary fees, including GDS reservation booking fees related to certain of the services listed above.
|
Advertising and other revenues are derived primarily from KAYAK for sending referrals to travel service providers and OTAs as well as from advertising placements on KAYAK's websites and mobile applications.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Agency Revenues | $ | 4,410,689 |
| | $ | 3,142,815 |
| | 40.3 | % |
| Merchant Revenues | 2,211,474 |
| | 2,104,752 |
| | 5.1 | % |
| Advertising and Other Revenues | 171,143 |
| | 13,389 |
| | 1,178.2 | % |
| Total Revenues | $ | 6,793,306 |
| | $ | 5,260,956 |
| | 29.1 | % |
Agency Revenues
Agency revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased 40.3% compared to the same period in 2012, primarily as a result of growth in the business of Booking.com. Our priceline.com agency revenues benefited from growth in our retail rental car business as well as the integration on the priceline.com website of the growing number of properties on the Booking.com extranet.
Merchant Revenues
Merchant revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased 5.1% compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to increases in our agoda.com hotel reservation service, rentalcars.com rental car reservation service and priceline.com Express Deals® hotel reservation and Name Your Own Price®air services, partially offset by a decline in Name Your Own Price®opaque hotel revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012. Merchant revenue growth over the prior year period was substantially lower than merchant gross bookings growth because our merchant revenues are disproportionately affected by our Name Your Own Price® service. Name Your Own Price® revenues are recorded "gross" with a corresponding supplier cost recorded in cost of revenues, and represented a smaller percentage, year-over-year, of total revenues compared to our faster-growing agoda.com, rentalcars.com and priceline.com Express Deals® services, which are recorded in revenue "net" of supplier cost. As a result, we believe that gross profit is an important measure to evaluate growth in our business.
Advertising and Other Revenues
Advertising and other revenuesBooking.com's earnings during the year ended December 31, 2013 consisted primarily of advertising revenues. Advertising revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes $154.5 million as a result of the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013,2015 and excludes intercompany revenues earned by KAYAK from other Priceline Group brands.
Cost of Revenues
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Cost of Revenues | $ | 1,077,420 |
| | $ | 1,177,275 |
| | (8.5 | )% |
Cost of Revenues
For the year ended December 31, 2013, cost of revenues consisted primarily of: (1) the cost of Name Your Own Price® hotel room reservations from our suppliers, net of applicable taxes, (2) the cost of Name Your Own Price® rental cars from our suppliers, net of applicable taxes; (3) the cost of Name Your Own Price® airline tickets, net of the federal air transportation tax, segment fees and passenger facility charges imposed in connection with the sale of airline tickets; (4) the cost of vacation packages from our suppliers, net of applicable taxes; and (5) the cost related to accruals for travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by 8.5%, primarily due to a decrease in our Name Your Own Price® hotel reservation service, partially offset by increases in our other Name Your Own Price® services and higher accruals for travel transaction taxes. Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes an accrual recorded in the first quarter of 2013 of approximately $20.5 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes, principally related to unfavorable rulings in the State of Hawaii and the District of Columbia, partially offset by a reduction in our accrual related to travel transaction taxes of $6.3 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013, principally related to a favorable agreement and ruling in the District of Columbia. Cost of revenue for the year ended December, 2012 includes an accrual of approximately $21 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes, principally related to unfavorable rulings in the State of Hawaii and in the District of Columbia.
Agency revenues have no cost of revenue. Agency revenues principally consist of travel commissions on accommodation reservations.
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Gross Profit | $ | 5,715,886 |
| | $ | 4,083,681 |
| | 40.0 | % |
| Gross Margin | 84.1 | % | | 77.6 | % | | |
|
Total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by 40.0% compared to the same period in 2012, primarily as a result of increased revenue discussed above. Total gross margin (gross profit expressed as a percentage of total revenue) increased during the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, because our revenues are disproportionately affected by our Name Your Own Price® service. Name Your Own Price® revenues are recorded "gross" with a corresponding travel service provider cost recorded in cost of revenues, and in the year ended December 31, 2013 represented a smaller percentage of total revenues than in the same period in 2012. Our retail and semi-opaque services, which are recorded in revenue "net" of supplier cost have been growing faster than our Name Your Own Price®services. As a result, we believe that gross profit is an important measure to evaluate growth in our business. Our international operations accounted for approximately $5.02 billion of our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013, which compares to $3.56 billion for the same period in 2012. Gross profit attributable to our international operations increased, on a local currency basis, by approximately 40% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. Gross profit attributable to our U.S. businesses increased by approximately 32.5% for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was positively impacted by the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was negatively impacted by an accrual recorded in the first quarter of 2013 of approximately $20.5 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes, principally related to unfavorable rulings in the State of Hawaii and the District of Columbia, partially offset by a credit in the fourth quarter of 2013 of $6.3 million, principally related to a favorable agreement and ruling in the District of Columbia. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was negatively impacted by an accrual of approximately $21 million (including estimated interest and penalties) for travel transaction taxes, principally related to unfavorable rulings in the State of Hawaii and in the District of Columbia.
Operating Expenses
Advertising
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Online Advertising | $ | 1,798,645 |
| | $ | 1,273,637 |
| | 41.2 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 31.5 | % | | 31.2 | % | | |
|
| Offline Advertising | $ | 127,459 |
| | $ | 35,492 |
| | 259.1 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 2.2 | % | | 0.9 | % | | |
|
Online advertising expenses primarily consist of the costs of (1) search engine keyword purchases; (2) referrals from meta-search and travel research websites; (3) affiliate programs; (4) banner, pop-up and other Internet advertisements; and (5) e-mail campaigns. For the year ended December 31, 2013, online advertising expenses increased 41.2% over the same period in 2012, primarily to generate increased gross bookings. Online advertising as a percentage of gross profit increased for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due to (1) lower ROIs for our online advertising, (2) brand mix within The Priceline Group and (3) channel mix within certain of our brands. Our online advertising ROIs were down year-over-year for the year ended December 31, 2013. Furthermore, our international brands are generally growing faster than our U.S. brands, and typically spend a higher percentage of gross profit on online advertising. Finally, certain of our brands are obtaining an increasing share of traffic through paid online advertising channels.
The inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013 had a favorable impact on online advertising as a percentage of gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 because KAYAK spends a lower percentage of gross profit on online advertising than our other brands, and our consolidated results exclude intercompany advertising by our brands on
KAYAK. This favorable impact will benefit year-over-year comparisons until the anniversary of the acquisition on May 21, 2014.
Offline advertising expenses are related to our television, print and radio advertising for our Booking.com, priceline.com and KAYAK businesses. For the year ended December 31, 2013, offline advertising increased 259.1% compared to the same period in 2012, due mainly to Booking.com launching in the United States its first offline advertising campaign in 2013, as well as the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013. Booking.com also launched an offline advertising campaign in Australia in the fourth quarter of 2013. Booking.com recently launched offline advertising campaigns in Canada and the United Kingdom and may expand its offline advertising into other markets during 2014.
Sales and Marketing
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Sales and Marketing | $ | 235,817 |
| | $ | 195,934 |
| | 20.4 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.1 | % | | 4.8 | % | | |
|
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of (1) credit card processing fees associated with merchant transactions; (2) fees paid to third-parties that provide call center, website content translations and other services; (3) provisions for bad debt, primarily related to agency accommodation commission receivables; and (4) provisions for credit card chargebacks. For the year ended December 31, 2013, sales and marketing expenses, which are substantially variable in nature, increased over the same period in 2012, primarily due to increased gross booking volumes as well as expenses related to increased content translations and the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of gross profit are typically higher for our merchant business, which incurs credit card processing fees. Our merchant business grew more slowly than our agency business, and as a result, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of total gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 declined compared to the same period in 2012. In addition, our agoda.com business achieved a year-over-year decline in its sales and marketing expense per transaction.
Personnel
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Personnel | $ | 698,692 |
| | $ | 466,828 |
| | 49.7 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 12.2 | % | | 11.4 | % | | |
|
Personnel expenses consist of compensation to our personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, bonuses, payroll taxes and employee health benefits. For the year ended December 31, 2013, personnel expenses increased over the same period in 2012, due primarily to increased headcount to support the growth of our businesses and the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013. Stock-based compensation expense was approximately $140.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Stock-based compensation expense of $30.9 million for KAYAK unvested assumed employee stock options and payroll taxes of $3.4 million for KAYAK stock option exercises were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013. Stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 also includes charges amounting to $24.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, representing the cumulative impact of adjusting the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period for outstanding unvested performance share units.
In July 2012 and December 2013, the Dutch Government enacted certain amendments to Dutch tax law including a one-time irrevocable levy on an employer applied to employee earnings, equal to 16% of an employee's earnings in excess of 150,000 Euros. This levy resulted in additional payroll taxes recorded in personnel expense of approximately $12 million (approximately $9 million after tax) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and approximately $14 million (approximately $10 million after tax) principally recorded in the third quarter of 2012.
General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| General and Administrative | $ | 252,994 |
| | $ | 173,171 |
| | 46.1 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 4.4 | % | | 4.2 | % | | |
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of: (1) personnel related expenses such as recruiting, training and travel expenses; (2) occupancy expenses; and (3) fees for outside professionals, including litigation expenses. General and administrative expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2013 over the same period in 2012, primarily due to higher recruiting, training and travel expenses related to increased headcount in all our businesses, higher occupancy and office expenses related to the expansion of our international businesses, and the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 included approximately $8.5 million of professional fees related to the acquisition of KAYAK. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes approximately $3 million of professional fees related to the acquisition of KAYAK and a charge of approximately $3 million related to certain leased space that was vacated in connection with the relocation of Booking.com's headquarters to a new location in Amsterdam.
Information Technology
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Information Technology | $ | 71,890 |
| | $ | 43,685 |
| | 64.6 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 1.3 | % | | 1.1 | % | | |
|
Information technology expenses consist primarily of: (1) outsourced data center costs; (2) system maintenance and software license fees; (3) data communications and other expenses associated with operating our services; and (4) payments to outside consultants. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the increase in information technology expenses compared to the same period in 2012 was due primarily to growth in our worldwide operations and the inclusion of KAYAK since its acquisition on May 21, 2013.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 117,975 |
| | $ | 65,141 |
| | 81.1 | % |
| % of Total Gross Profit | 2.1 | % | | 1.6 | % | | |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of: (1) amortization of intangible assets with determinable lives; (2) depreciation on computer equipment; (3) depreciation of internally developed and purchased software; and (4) depreciation of leasehold improvements, office equipment and furniture and fixtures. For the year ended December 31, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense increased from the same period in 2012 due primarily to intangible amortization from the KAYAK acquisition for $33.4 million, and increased depreciation expense due to capital expenditures for additional data center capacity and office build outs to support growth and geographic expansion, principally related to our Booking.com brand.
Other Income (Expense)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Interest Income | $ | 4,167 |
| | $ | 3,860 |
| | 8.0 | % |
| Interest Expense | (83,289 | ) | | (62,064 | ) | | 34.2 | % |
| Foreign Currency Transactions and Other | (36,755 | ) | | (9,720 | ) | | 278.1 | % |
| Total | $ | (115,877 | ) | | $ | (67,924 | ) | | 70.6 | % |
For the year ended December 31, 2013, interest income on cash and marketable securities increased over the same period in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the average invested balance partially offset by lower yields. Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the average outstanding debt resulting from the May 2013 issuance of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes and the March 2012 issuance of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes.
Derivative contracts that hedge our exposure to the impact of currency fluctuations on the translation of our international operating results into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation resulted in foreign exchange gains of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with foreign exchange gains of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and are recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Foreign exchange transaction losses, including costs related to foreign exchange transactions, resulted in losses of $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to foreign exchange transaction losses of $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and are recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company delivered cash of $414.6 million to repay the aggregate principal amount and issued 972,235 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount associated with the 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2015 that were converted prior to maturity. The conversion of our convertible debt prior to maturity resulted in a non-cash loss of $26.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, and is recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Income Tax Expense | $ | 403,739 |
| | $ | 337,832 |
| | 19.5 | % |
Our effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were 17.6% and 19.2%, respectively. Our effective tax rate differs from the expected tax provision at the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally due to lower tax rates outside the United States, partially offset by state income taxes and certain non-deductible expenses. Our effective tax rates were lower for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, due to growth in our international businesses.
According to Dutch corporate income tax law, income generated from qualifying "innovative" activities is taxed at a rate of 5% ("Innovation Box Tax") rather than the Dutch statutory rate of 25%. Booking.com obtained a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities in February 2011 confirming that a portion of its earnings is eligible2014 qualified for Innovation Box Tax treatment. The ruling fromtreatment, which had a significant beneficial impact on the DutchCompany's effective tax authorities is valid through December 31, 2017.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | (in thousands) | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 | | Change |
| Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 135 |
| | $ | 4,471 |
| | (97.0 | )% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest is lowerrate for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, mainly due to a reduction in redeemable noncontrolling interests. We purchased the remaining outstanding shares underlying the redeemable noncontrolling interests in April 2013.those periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2014,2016, we had $8.0$13.9 billion in cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments. Approximately $6.9$12.6 billion is held by our international subsidiaries and is denominated primarily in U.S. Dollars, Euros and, to a lesser extent, British Pounds Sterling and other currencies. Cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments are comprised of U.S. and international corporate bonds, U.S. and international government securities, high-grade commercial paper, U.S. government agency securities, convertible debt securities and equity securities of Ctrip, money market funds and time deposits (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
We currently intend to indefinitely reinvest these fundsthe unremitted earnings of our international subsidiaries outside of the United States. At December 31, 2016, we had approximately $13.0 billion cumulative unremitted international earnings. We estimate that the deferred tax liability we would record if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested internationally is approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2016. If we repatriate cash to the United States, we would utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and beyond that amount incur additional tax payments in the United States. Cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments are comprised of U.S. and foreign corporate bonds, U.S. and foreign government securities, high grade commercial paper, foreign equity securities, U.S. government agency securities, U.S. municipal securities and bank deposits.
In October 2011,May 2016, we issued Senior Notes due June 1, 2026, with an interest rate of 3.6% (the "2026 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. Interest on the 2026 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1, beginning December 1, 2016. The net proceeds of these notes may be used for general corporate purposes, which may include share repurchases, repayment of debt and acquisitions. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on the 2026 Notes.
In June 2015, we entered into a $1.0$2.0 billion five-year unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of lenders. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear interest, at our option, at a rate per annum equal to either (i) the adjusted LIBOR for the interest period in effect for such borrowing plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00%0.875% to 1.50%; or (ii) the greatest of (a) JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association'sof America, N.A.'s prime lending rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%0.5%, and (c) an adjusted LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50%. Undrawn balances available under the revolving credit facility are subject to commitment fees at the applicable rate ranging from 0.10%0.085% to 0.25%0.20%. The revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of up to $100.0$70.0 million of letters of credit as well as borrowings of up to $50.0 million on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros, British Pounds Sterling and any other foreign currency agreed to by the lenders. The proceeds of loans made under the facility will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2014,2016, there were no borrowings under the facility,outstanding and approximately $4.0$3.8 million of letters of credit issued under the facility.
On July 24, 2014, we acquired OpenTable, Inc., a leading provider of online restaurant reservations, in a cash transaction for a purchase price of approximately $2.5 billion (approximately $2.4 billion net of cash acquired) or $103.00 per share of OpenTable common stock. We funded the acquisition from cash on hand in the United States and $995 million borrowed under our revolving credit facility, which was repaid during the third quarter of 2014.
In August 2014, we issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount ofOur Convertible Senior Notes due 2021,March 15, 2018, with an interest rate of 0.9%. Interest on1.0% (the "2018 Notes"), are convertible at the notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year. We used approximately $147.3 millionoption of the net proceedsholders as of December 31, 2016, and, accordingly, we reported the carrying value of the 2018 Notes as a current liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016. We have received a notice for conversion of $3 thousand aggregate principal amount for the 2018 Notes throughFebruary 24, 2017. If note holders exercise their option to concurrently repurchase outstandingconvert, we would be required to repay the principal amount of the 2018 Notes in cash and may deliver shares of our common stock. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include repurchases of our common stock or cash, at our option, to satisfy the conversion value in excess of the principal amount. We may borrow under the revolving credit facility to satisfy our obligation.
In September 2016, we invested $25 million in a Ctrip six-year senior convertible note issued at par value and $25 million in Ctrip ordinary shares.
In September 2016, we signed a turnkey agreement to construct an office building in the Netherlands for the future headquarters of Booking.com for approximately 270 million Euros. Upon signing the agreement, we paid approximately 48 million Euros to the developer, principally related to acquired land use rights, and we expect to pay approximately 34 million Euros related to building construction during 2017, with the remainder of payments being paid periodically beginning in 2018 until the expected completion of the building in late 2020. We will also incur capital expenditures to fit out and furnish the office space. We utilized international cash for the September 2016 payment and we expect all future payments to be made from time to time, repaying outstanding debt and corporate acquisitions.international cash. See Note 1114 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on these notes.Statements.
In August 2014, we used $500 million of our non-U.S. cash to invest in a five-year senior convertible note issued by Ctrip.com International Ltd. ("Ctrip"). Additionally, duringDuring the year ended December 31, 2014, we invested $421.9 million of our non-U.S. cash in Ctrip American Depositary Shares. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on these investments.
In September 2014, we issued 1.0 billion Euro aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes due 2024, with an interest rate of 2.375%. Interest on the notes is payable annually on September 23, beginning September 23, 2015. We intend to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include repurchases of our common stock from time to time, repaying outstanding debt and corporate acquisitions. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details on these notes.
In the third and fourth quarters of 2014,2016, we repurchased 114,645762,984 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $1.0 billion, which includes stock repurchases in privately negotiated, off-market transactions and 438,897December 2016 of 10,215 shares for an aggregate cost of $15.0 million that were settled in January 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a remaining authorization of $2.1 billion to purchase its common stock. In the first quarter of 2017, the Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $2.0 billion of our common stock, in the open market for aggregate costs of $147.3 million and $500.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, we had a remaining aggregate amount of $7.2 million authorized by our Board of Directorsaddition to purchase our common stock. On February 5, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized us to repurchase up to an additional $3.0 billion of our common stock.amounts previously authorized. We may from time to time make additional repurchases of our common stock, depending on prevailing market conditions, alternate uses of capital and other factors. We
may use cash-on-hand and cash generated by our operations in the United States to fund our share repurchases. We may also utilize our revolving credit facility or raise funds through the debt capital markets to fund share repurchases.
On February 7, 2017, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire the Momondo Group. We will use approximately $550 million of our international cash to fund this acquisition. The deal is expected to close later in the year, subject to regulatory approval.
Our merchant transactions are structured such that we collect cash up front from our customersconsumers and then we pay most of our travel service providers at a subsequent date. We therefore tend to experience significant seasonal swings in accounts receivable, deferred merchant bookings and travel service provider payables seasonally depending on the absolute level of our merchant transactions during the last few weeks of every quarter.
DuringNet cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2014, we paid $122.92016, was $3.9 billion, resulting from net income of $2.1 billion, a favorable impact of $1.6 billion for non-cash items not affecting cash flows and net favorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities of $215.9 million to satisfy. The changes in working capital for the aggregate principal amount due and issued 300,256 shares of our common stock and paid cash of $2.2 million in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount for debt converted prior to maturityyear ended December 31, 2016, were primarily related to the conversiona $516.4 million increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, offset by a $284.2 million increase in accounts receivable. The increase in these working capital balances was primarily related to increases in business volumes. Non-cash items were principally associated with impairment of goodwill, stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment of cost-method investments, amortization of debt discount on our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2015.convertible notes and deferred income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, was $3.1 billion, resulting from net income of $2.6 billion and a favorable impact of $558.9 million for non-cash items not affecting cash flows, partially offset by net unfavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities of $8.0 million. The changes in working capital for the year ended December 31, 2015, were primarily related to a $166.2 million increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, offset by a $68.7 million increase in accounts receivable and $81.6 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets. The increase in these working capital balances was primarily related to increases in business volumes. Non-cash items were primarily associated with stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, amortization of debt discount and deferred income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2014, was $2.9$2.9 billion,, resulting from net income of $2.4$2.4 billion and a favorable impact of non-cash items not affecting cash flows of $518.0$518.0 million,, slightly offset by net unfavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities of $25.4 million.$25.4 million. The changes in working capital for the year ended December 31, 2014, were primarily related to a $203.9$203.9 million increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, offset by a $182.2$182.2 million increase in accounts receivable and $48.9 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets. The increase in these working capital balances was primarily related to increases in business volumes. Non-cash items were primarily associated with stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, amortization of debt discount and deferred income taxes.
Net cash provided by operatingused in investing activities was $3.3 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013, was $2.32016 were principally affected by net purchases of investments of $3.1 billion resulting from net income of $1.9 billion, a favorable impact of non-cash items not affecting cash flows of $355.7and $48.5 million and net favorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities of $52.9 million. The changes in working capital for the year ended December 31, 2013, were primarily related to a $182.2 million increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, partially offset by a $111.6 million increase in accounts receivable. The increase in these working capital balances was primarily related to increases in business volumes. Non-cash items were primarily associated with stock-based compensation expense, depreciation and amortization, amortizationacquisition of debt discount, a non-cash loss on convertible notes converted prior to maturity, and deferred income taxes.
land use rights. Net cash used in investing activities was $2.3$3.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015. Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were affected by net purchases of investments of $3.6 billion, $140.3 million used for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, partially offset by net proceeds of $5.2 million for the settlement of foreign currency contracts. Net cash used in investing activities was $2.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014. Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 were affected by payments of $2.5$2.5 billion for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and net cash payments of $80.3$80.3 million for the settlement of foreign currency contracts slightly offset by net sales of investments of $350.3 million and a change in restricted cash of $9.3 million. Net cash used in investing activities was $2.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013. Investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 were affected by net purchases of investments of $1.7 billion, payments of $331.9 million for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, a change in restricted cash of $2.8 million, and net cash payments of $78.6 million for the settlement of foreign currency contracts.$350.3 million. Cash invested in the purchase of property and equipment was $131.5$219.9 million, $173.9 and $84.4$131.5 million in the years ended December 31, 20142016, 2015 and 2013,2014, respectively. The increase in 2014 wasincreases for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were related to additional data center capacity and new offices to support growth and geographic expansion, principally related to our Booking.com business.and agoda.com brands in 2016 and principally related to our Booking.com brand in 2015.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $57.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily consisted of net proceeds of $994.7 million from the issuance of Senior Notes, excess tax benefits on stock-based awards and other equity deductions of $61.0 million and the exercise of employee stock options of $15.6 million, partially offset by treasury stock purchases of $1.0 billion. Net cash used in financing activities was $730.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily consisted of treasury stock purchases of $3.1 billion, payments of $147.6 million related to
the conversion of Senior Notes and payment of $10.7 million related to the settlement of the acquisition-date estimated contingent liability related to an acquisition, primarily offset by the total proceeds of $2.4 billion from the issuance of Senior Notes, excess tax benefits on stock-based awards of $101.5 million and the exercise of employee stock options of $20.9 million. Net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $1.4$1.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2014. Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 primarily consisted of total proceeds of $2.3$2.3 billion from the issuance of Convertible Senior Notes and Euro denominated Senior Notes, excess tax benefits fromon stock-based compensationawards of $23.4$23.4 million and the exercise of employee stock options of $16.4$16.4 million,, partially offset by treasury stock purchases of $750.4$750.4 million and payments of $125.1$125.1 million related to the conversion of Senior Notes. Net cash used in financing activities was approximately $403.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily related to payments for treasury stock purchases of $883.5 million, $192.5 million spent to purchase the remaining shares underlying noncontrolling interests in rentalcars.com, $414.6 million to satisfy the aggregate principal amount due upon the early conversion of senior notes, and $1.0 million of debt issuance costs, partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of convertible senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion, $91.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options, and $17.7 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation.
Contingencies
ContingenciesFrench tax authorities recently concluded an audit that started in 2013 of the years 2003 through 2012 to determine whether Booking.com is in compliance with its tax obligations in France. Booking.com received formal assessments in December 2015 in which the French tax authorities claim that Booking.com has a permanent establishment in France and seek to recover unpaid income taxes and value-added taxes of approximately 356 million Euros, the majority of which would represent penalties and interest. We believe that Booking.com has been, and continues to be, in compliance with French tax law and we intend to contest the assessments. If we are unable to resolve the matter with the French authorities, we would expect to challenge the assessments in the French courts. In order to contest the assessments in court, we may be required to pay, upfront, the full amount or a significant part of any such assessments, though any such payment would not constitute an admission by us that we owe the taxes. At the end of 2016, French authorities announced their intention to also audit the tax years 2013 to 2015, which could result in additional assessments. See Part I Item IA Risk Factors - "We may have exposure to additional tax liabilities."
A number of U.S. jurisdictions have initiated lawsuits against online travel companies, including us, related to, among other things, the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). In addition, a number of U.S. states, counties and municipalities have initiated audit proceedings, issued proposed tax assessments or started inquiries relating to the payment of travel transaction taxes. To date, the majority of taxing jurisdictions in which we facilitate the making of travel reservations have not asserted that taxes are due and payable on our travel services. With respect to jurisdictions that have not initiated proceedings to date, it is possible that they will do so in the future or that they will seek to amend their tax statutes and seek to collect taxes from us only on a prospective basis. SeeFor additional information, see Note 1614 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of these pending cases and proceedings and Part I Item 1A Risk Factors - "Adverse application of U.S. state and local tax laws could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations." in this Annual Report.
As a result of this litigation and other attempts by U.S. jurisdictions to levy similar taxes, we have established an accrual (including estimated interest and penalties) for the potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes in the amount of approximately $52$27 million atas of both December 31, 20142016 and approximately $55 million at December 31, 2013.2015. The accrual is based on our estimate of the probable cost of resolving these issues. Our legal expenses for these matters are expensed as incurred and are not reflected in the amount accrued. The actual cost may be less or greater, potentially significantly, than the liabilities recorded. An estimate for a reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued cannot be reasonably made. We believe that, even ifIf we were to suffer adverse determinations in the near term in more of the pending proceedings than currently anticipated given results to date, because of our available cash we believe that it would not have a material impact on our liquidity.
The following table represents our material contractual obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2014 (see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements):2016:
| | | | | Payments due by Period (in thousands) | | Payments due by Period (in thousands) |
| Contractual Obligations | | Total | | Less than 1 Year | | 1 to 3 Years | | 3 to 5 Years | | More than 5 Years | | Total | | Less than 1 Year | | 1 to 3 Years | | 3 to 5 Years | | More than 5 Years |
Operating lease obligations | | $ | 437,386 |
| | $ | 79,902 |
| | $ | 133,436 |
| | $ | 93,157 |
| | $ | 130,891 |
| | $ | 523,820 |
| | $ | 102,339 |
| | $ | 193,885 |
| | $ | 134,124 |
| | $ | 93,472 |
|
Senior Notes(1) | | 4,681,331 |
| | 102,891 |
| | 102,478 |
| | 1,084,534 |
| | 3,391,428 |
| |
Revolving credit facility(2) | | 3,212 |
| | 1,938 |
| | 1,274 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Land lease obligation(1) | | | 63,851 |
| | 1,317 |
| | 2,633 |
| | 2,633 |
| | 57,268 |
|
Building construction obligation(1) | | | 233,385 |
| | 34,860 |
| | 136,516 |
| | 62,009 |
| | — |
|
Senior Notes(2) | | | 8,481,228 |
| | 137,794 |
| | 1,260,587 |
| | 2,250,337 |
| | 4,832,510 |
|
Revolving credit facility(3) | | | 9,447 |
| | 3,188 |
| | 5,075 |
| | 1,184 |
| | — |
|
| Earnout - acquisition | | 10,700 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,700 |
| | — |
| | 9,170 |
| | — |
| | 9,170 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total(3) | | $ | 5,132,629 |
| | $ | 184,731 |
| | $ | 237,188 |
| | $ | 1,188,391 |
| | $ | 3,522,319 |
| |
Total(4) | | | $ | 9,320,901 |
| | $ | 279,498 |
| | $ | 1,607,866 |
| | $ | 2,450,287 |
| | $ | 4,983,250 |
|
_____________________________
| |
| (1) | See the section on "Operating Leases" and "Building Construction" section of Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more details. |
| |
| (2) | Represents the aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes outstanding as of December 31, 20142016 and cumulative interest to maturity of $434 million.$1.1 billion. Convertible debt does not reflect the market value in excess of the outstanding principal amount because we can settle the conversion premium amount in cash or shares of common stock at our option. See Note 11 |
principal amount because we can settle the conversion premium amount in cash or shares of common stock at our option. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| |
(2)(3) | Represents fees on uncommitted funds and outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2014.2016. |
| |
(3)(4) | We reported "Other long-term liabilities" of $104$139 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014,2016, of which approximately $52$53 million related to deferred rents, approximately $30 million related to unrecognized tax benefits (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and approximately $27 million related to our accrual for the potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes (see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and approximately $32 million related to unrecognized tax benefits (see Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). A variety of factors could affect the timing of payments for these liabilities.the liabilities related to travel transaction taxes and unrecognized tax benefits. We believe that these matters will likely not be resolved in the next twelve months and accordingly we have classified the estimated liability as "non-current" onnon-current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. WeTherefore, we have excluded "Other long-term liabilities" in the amountliabilities of $93$130 million from the contractual obligations table above because we cannot reasonably estimate the timing of such payments. payments or the liability is related to deferred rents, which represents the difference in rent expense recognized in the income statements and rent payments related to operating leases. |
On December 15, 2014, our 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2015 became convertible at the option of the holders without regard to our stock price and will remain convertible without regard to our stock price until the trading day prior to the maturity date of March 15, 2015. If the holders elect to convert, we will be required to pay the aggregate principal amount in cash and we have elected to deliver cash for the conversion value in excess of the aggregate principal amount. We would likely fund our conversion obligations from cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
We believe that our existing cash balances and liquid resources will be sufficient to fund our operating activities, capital expenditures and other obligations through at least the next twelve months. However, if during that period or thereafter, we are not successful in generating sufficient cash flow from operations or in raising additional capital when required in sufficient amounts and on terms acceptable to us, we may be required to reduce our planned capital expenditures and scale back the scope of our business plan, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our future financial condition or results of operations. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then current stockholders would be diluted. We may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, revenue growth or sustained profitability may not be realized, and future borrowings or equity sales may not be available in amounts sufficient to make anticipated capital expenditures, finance our strategies or repay our indebtedness.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
As of December 31, 2014,2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We manage our exposure to interest rate risk and foreign currency risk through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We use foreigncurrency exchange derivative contracts to manage short-term foreign currency risk.
The objective of our policies is to mitigate potential income statement, cash flow and fair value exposures resulting from possible future adverse fluctuations in rates. We evaluate our exposure to market risk by assessing the anticipated near-term and long-term fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. This evaluation includes the review of leading market indicators, discussions with financial analysts and investment bankers regarding current and future economic conditions and the review of market projections as to expected future rates. We utilize this information to determine our own investment strategies as well as to determine if the use of derivative financial instruments is appropriate to mitigate any potential future market exposure that we may face. Our policy does not allow speculation in derivative instruments for profit or execution of derivative instrument contracts for which there are no underlying exposures. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. To the extent that changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates affect general economic conditions, we would also be affected by such changes.
We did not experience any material changes in interest rate exposures during the year ended December 31, 2014.2016. Based upon economic conditions and leading market indicators at December 31, 2014,2016, we do not foresee a significant adverse change in interest rates in the near future.
Fixed rate investments are subject to unrealized gains and losses due to interest rate volatility. We performed a sensitivity analysis to determine the impact a change in interest rates would have on the fair value of our available for saleavailable-for-sale investments assuming an adverse change of 100 basis points. AAs of December 31, 2016, a hypothetical 100 basis point (1.0%) increase in interest rates would have resulted in a decrease in the fair values of our investments as of December 31, 2014 ofin debt securities by approximately $85$204 million. These hypothetical losses would only be realized if we sold the investments prior to their maturity. This amount excludes our investment in Ctrip.com International Ltd. ("Ctrip") senior convertible notes, which are also subject to market price risk, which could potentially have a more significant impact on the change in fair value. The fair
value of our Ctrip senior convertible notes will likely increase as the market price of Ctrip's American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") increase and decrease as the price of Ctrip's ADSs fall.
As of December 31, 2014,2016, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of our debt is $4.2was approximately $7.4 billion. We estimate that the market value of such debt was approximately $4.8$8.4 billion as of December 31, 2014.2016. A substantial portion of the market value of our debt in excess of the outstanding principal amount is related to the conversion premium on our outstanding convertible bonds.notes.
We conduct a significant portion of our business outside the United States through subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the U.S. Dollar (primarily Euros). As a result, we face exposureexposures to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the operating results of our international operations are translated from local currencycurrencies into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation. If the U.S. Dollar weakens against the local currency,currencies, the translation of these foreign-currency-denominated balances will result in increased net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses, and net income. Similarly, our net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses, and net income will decrease if the U.S. Dollar strengthens against the local currency. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions, denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, resultsresult in gains and losses that are reflected in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations.
Throughout 2015, the U.S. Dollar strengthened significantly year-over-year relative to substantially all currencies in which we transact, most notably the Euro, Brazilian Real, British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and Australian Dollar. In 2016, the U.S. Dollar continued to be stronger year-over-year relative to the British Pound Sterling, Russian Ruble and many other major currencies in which we transact. Since the “Brexit” referendum in the United Kingdom in June 2016, the U.S. Dollar has strengthened significantly against the British Pound Sterling. As a result of these currency exchange rate changes, our foreign currency denominated net assets, gross bookings, gross profit, operating expenses and net income have been negatively impacted as expressed in U.S. Dollars, although to a much lesser extent in 2016 than in 2015. Since our expenses are generally denominated in foreign currencies on a basis similar to our revenues, our operating margins are not significantly impacted by currency fluctuations. The aggregate principal value of our Euro-denominated 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2027 Notes, and accrued interest thereon, provide a natural hedge of the net assets of certain of our Euro functional currency subsidiaries.
From time to time, we enter into foreign exchange derivative contracts to minimize the impact of short-term foreign currency fluctuations onin our consolidated operating results. Our derivative contracts principally address foreign exchange fluctuation risk for the Euro, and the British Pound Sterling and certain other currencies versus the U.S. Dollar. As of December 31, 20142016 and 2013,2015, there were no such outstanding derivative contracts associated withcontracts. Foreign exchange gains of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, foreign currency translation risk. Foreignexchange losses of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and foreign exchange gains of $13.7 million $0.3 million, and $0.7 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014 2013, and 2012, respectively, were recorded in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (See Part IV Item 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules).
: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013;2015; Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012;2014; Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements; and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we include a report of our management's assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2014.2016.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2014.2016. Our independent registered public accounting firm also attested to, and reported on our management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Controls. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) occurred during the three months ended December 31, 20142016 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Priceline Group Inc.
Norwalk, Connecticut
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of The Priceline Group Inc. (formerly known as priceline.com Incorporated) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying "Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" appearing in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20142016 of the Company and our report dated February 18, 201527, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
February 18, 201527, 2017
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information required by Part III Item 10 will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information required by Part III Item 11 will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information required by Part III Item 12 will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by Part III Item 13 will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2016, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by Part III Item 14 will be included in our Proxy Statement relating to our 20152017 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 20142016 and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) List of Documents Filed as a Part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the report of our independent registered public accounting firm are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
10-K: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20142016 and 2013; and the related2015; Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132016, 2015 and 2012;2014; Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, not material or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.
(b) Exhibits
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. Some agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
| |
| • | may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, whichdisclosuresarenot necessarily reflected in the agreement; |
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K and the Company's other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
| |
| Exhibit Number | Description |
| 3.1(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. |
| 3.2(b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant. |
| 4.1 | Reference is hereby made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
| 4.2(c) | Specimen Certificate for Registrant's Common Stock. |
| 4.3(d) | Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2012, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
| 4.4(e) | Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2013, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
| 4.5(f) | Indenture, dated as of August 20, 2014, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
| 4.6(g) | Indenture for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024, 1.800% Senior Notes due 2027, 3.650% Senior Notes due 2025, 2.15% Senior Notes due 2022 and 3.600% Senior Notes due 2026, between the Registrant and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. |
| 4.7(h) | Form of 2.375% Senior Note due 2024. |
| 4.8(i) | Officers' Certificate, dated September 23, 2014, for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024. |
| 4.9(j) | Form of 1.800% Senior Note due 2027. |
| 4.10(k) | Officers' Certificate, dated March 3, 2015, for the 1.800% Senior Notes due 2027. |
| 4.11(l) | Form of 3.650% Senior Note due 2025. |
| 4.12(m) | Officers' Certificate, dated March 13, 2015, for the 3.650% Senior Notes due 2025. |
| 4.13(g) | Form of 2.15% Senior Note due 2022. |
| 4.14(g) | Officers' Certificate, dated November 25, 2015, for the 2.15% Senior Notes due 2022. |
| 4.15(n) | Form of 3.600% Senior Note due 2026. |
| 4.16(n) | Officers' Certificate, dated May 23, 2016, for the 3.600% Senior Notes due 2026. |
| 10.1(o)+ | priceline.com Incorporated 1999 Omnibus Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 6, 2013). |
| 10.2(p)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees in the Netherlands under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
| 10.3(q)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for awards under the 1999 Omnibus Plan to non-employee directors. |
| 10.4(r)+ | 2014 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
| 10.5(s)+ | 2015 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
| 10.6(t)+ | 2016 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
| 10.7(u)+ | Amended and Restated KAYAK Software Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. |
| 10.8(v)+ | OpenTable, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan. |
| 10.9(w)+ | Buuteeq, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Plan. |
| 10.10(x)+ | Amended and Restated Rocket Travel, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. |
| 10.11(x)+ | The Priceline Group Inc. Amended and Restated Annual Bonus Plan. |
| 10.12(y)+ | Form of Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. |
| 10.13(z)+ | Transition Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
|
| |
| Exhibit Number | Description |
| 10.14(t)+ | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated March 5, 2015 by and between the Registrant, Booking.com Holding B.V. and Darren R. Huston. |
| 10.15(z)+ | Amended and Restated Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
| 10.16(aa)+ | Indemnification Agreement, dated September 12, 2011 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
| 10.17(bb)+ | Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
| 10.18(cc)+ | Letter amendment, dated December 16, 2008, to letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
| 10.19(dd)+ | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated April 21, 2015 by and between the Registrant and Peter J. Millones. |
| 10.20(ee)+ | Amended and Restated Employment contract, dated May 19, 2016 by and between Booking.com Holding B.V. and Gillian Tans. |
| 10.21(ff)+ | Separation Letter, dated April 27, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
| 10.22(ee)+ | Employment Letter Agreement, dated May 19, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
| 10.23(gg)+ | Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.24(gg)+ | Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.25(gg)+ | Employee Confidentiality and Assignment Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.26(gg)+ | Letter Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
| 10.27(hh) | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent. |
| 12.1 | Statement of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| 21 | List of Subsidiaries. |
| 23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
| 24.1 | Power of Attorney (included in the Signature Page). |
| 31.1 | Certification of Glenn D. Fogel, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 32.1(ii) | Certification of Glenn D. Fogel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
| 32.2(ii) | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
| 101 | The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2016 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
____________________________
| |
| + | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
| |
| |
| (a) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (b) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (c) | Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on March 18, 1999 (File No. 333-69657). |
| (d) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2012 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (e) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (f) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (g) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (h) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
|
| |
| (i) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (j) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (k) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (l) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (m) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (n) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (o) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on June 6, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (p) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 8, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (q) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (r) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (s) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (t) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (u) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2014 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (v) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (w) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 13, 2014 (File No. 333-196756). |
| (x) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (y) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (z) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (aa) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (bb) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (cc) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (dd) | Previously filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ee) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ff) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (gg) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (hh) | Previously filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ii) | This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33‑8212 and 34‑47551. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| THE PRICELINE GROUP INC. |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ Glenn D. Fogel |
| | Name: | Glenn D. Fogel |
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President |
| | Date: | February 27, 2017 |
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Glenn D. Fogel, Daniel J. Finnegan and Peter J. Millones, and each of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power of substitution and resubstitution to sign in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any and all instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments hereto, as fully and for all intents and purposes as he or she might do or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, and his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Glenn D. Fogel | | Director, Chief Executive Officer and President | | February 27, 2017 |
| Glenn D. Fogel | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jeffery H. Boyd | | Director, Executive Chairman of the Board | | February 27, 2017 |
| Jeffery H. Boyd | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Daniel J. Finnegan | | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting | | February 27, 2017 |
| Daniel J. Finnegan | | Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Timothy M. Armstrong | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Timothy M. Armstrong | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jan L. Docter | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Jan L. Docter | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Jeffrey E. Epstein | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Jeffrey E. Epstein | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ James M. Guyette | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| James M. Guyette | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Charles H. Noski | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Charles H. Noski | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Nancy B. Peretsman | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Nancy B. Peretsman | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Thomas E. Rothman | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Thomas E. Rothman | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Craig W. Rydin | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Craig W. Rydin | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ Lynn M. Vojvodich | | Director | | February 27, 2017 |
| Lynn M. Vojvodich | | | | |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
| |
| Page No. |
| |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 | |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 | |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 | |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 | |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 | |
| |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Priceline Group Inc.
Norwalk, Connecticut
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Priceline Group Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Priceline Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
February 27, 2017
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
| Current assets: | | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,081,075 |
| | $ | 1,477,265 |
|
| Short-term investments | | 2,218,880 |
| | 1,171,246 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,565 and $15,014, respectively | | 860,115 |
| | 645,169 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 241,449 |
| | 259,557 |
|
| Total current assets | | 5,401,519 |
| | 3,553,237 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | | 347,017 |
| | 274,786 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | | 1,993,885 |
| | 2,167,533 |
|
| Goodwill | | 2,396,906 |
| | 3,375,000 |
|
| Long-term investments | | 9,591,067 |
| | 7,931,363 |
|
| Other assets | | 108,579 |
| | 118,656 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 19,838,973 |
| | $ | 17,420,575 |
|
| | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
| Current liabilities: | | |
| | |
|
| Accounts payable | | $ | 419,108 |
| | $ | 322,842 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 857,467 |
| | 681,587 |
|
| Deferred merchant bookings | | 614,361 |
| | 434,881 |
|
| Convertible debt | | 967,734 |
| | — |
|
| Total current liabilities | | 2,858,670 |
| | 1,439,310 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 822,334 |
| | 892,576 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | | 138,767 |
| | 134,777 |
|
| Long-term debt | | 6,170,522 |
| | 6,158,443 |
|
| Total liabilities | | 9,990,293 |
| | 8,625,106 |
|
| | | |
| | |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 14) | |
|
| |
|
|
| Convertible debt | | 28,538 |
| | — |
|
| | | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | |
| | |
|
| Common stock, $0.008 par value, authorized 1,000,000,000 shares, 62,379,247 and 62,039,516 shares issued, respectively | | 485 |
| | 482 |
|
| Treasury stock, 13,190,929 and 12,427,945 shares, respectively | | (6,855,164 | ) | | (5,826,640 | ) |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 5,482,653 |
| | 5,184,910 |
|
| Retained earnings | | 11,326,852 |
| | 9,191,865 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | (134,684 | ) | | 244,852 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity | | 9,820,142 |
| | 8,795,469 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 19,838,973 |
| | $ | 17,420,575 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Agency revenues | | $ | 7,982,116 |
| | $ | 6,527,898 |
| | $ | 5,845,802 |
|
| Merchant revenues | | 2,048,005 |
| | 2,082,973 |
| | 2,186,054 |
|
| Advertising and other revenues | | 712,885 |
| | 613,116 |
| | 410,115 |
|
| Total revenues | | 10,743,006 |
| | 9,223,987 |
| | 8,441,971 |
|
| Cost of revenues | | 428,314 |
| | 632,180 |
| | 857,841 |
|
| Gross profit | | 10,314,692 |
| | 8,591,807 |
| | 7,584,130 |
|
| Operating expenses: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Performance advertising | | 3,479,287 |
| | 2,738,218 |
| | 2,334,453 |
|
| Brand advertising | | 295,698 |
| | 273,704 |
| | 257,077 |
|
| Sales and marketing | | 435,225 |
| | 353,221 |
| | 310,910 |
|
| Personnel, including stock-based compensation of $249,574, $247,395, and $186,425, respectively | | 1,350,032 |
| | 1,166,226 |
| | 950,191 |
|
| General and administrative | | 455,909 |
| | 415,420 |
| | 352,869 |
|
| Information technology | | 142,393 |
| | 113,617 |
| | 97,498 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 309,135 |
| | 272,494 |
| | 207,820 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | | 940,700 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 7,408,379 |
| | 5,332,900 |
| | 4,510,818 |
|
| Operating income | | 2,906,313 |
| | 3,258,907 |
| | 3,073,312 |
|
| Other income (expense): | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest income | | 94,946 |
| | 55,729 |
| | 13,933 |
|
| Interest expense | | (207,900 | ) | | (160,229 | ) | | (88,353 | ) |
| Foreign currency transactions and other | | (16,913 | ) | | (26,087 | ) | | (9,444 | ) |
| Impairment of cost-method investments | | (63,208 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total other expense | | (193,075 | ) | | (130,587 | ) | | (83,864 | ) |
| Earnings before income taxes | | 2,713,238 |
| | 3,128,320 |
| | 2,989,448 |
|
| Income tax expense | | 578,251 |
| | 576,960 |
| | 567,695 |
|
| Net income | | $ | 2,134,987 |
| | $ | 2,551,360 |
| | $ | 2,421,753 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | | $ | 43.14 |
| | $ | 50.09 |
| | $ | 46.30 |
|
| Weighted-average number of basic common shares outstanding | | 49,491 |
| | 50,940 |
| | 52,301 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share | | $ | 42.65 |
| | $ | 49.45 |
| | $ | 45.67 |
|
| Weighted-average number of diluted common shares outstanding | | 50,063 |
| | 51,593 |
| | 53,023 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Net income | | $ | 2,134,987 |
| | $ | 2,551,360 |
| | $ | 2,421,753 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments(1) | | (93,984 | ) | | (114,505 | ) | | (187,356 | ) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities(2) | | (285,552 | ) | | 619,259 |
| | (157,275 | ) |
| Comprehensive income | | $ | 1,755,451 |
| | $ | 3,056,114 |
| | $ | 2,077,122 |
|
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustments includes a tax charge of $34,268, $60,418 and $55,597 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, associated with net investment hedges (See Note 12). The remaining balance in foreign currency translation adjustments excludes income taxes as a result of the Company's intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its international subsidiaries outside of the United States (See Note 13).
(2) Net of a tax charge of $15,313 and $1,551 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and net of a tax benefit of $7,621 for the year ended December 31, 2014.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2013 | 61,265 |
| | $ | 476 |
| | (9,257 | ) | | $ | (1,987,207 | ) | | $ | 4,592,979 |
| | $ | 4,218,752 |
| | $ | 84,729 |
| | $ | 6,909,729 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,421,753 |
| | — |
| | 2,421,753 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax charge of $55,597 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (187,356 | ) | | (187,356 | ) |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax benefit of $7,621 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (157,275 | ) | | (157,275 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,204 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,204 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 256 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,389 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,391 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (631 | ) | | (750,378 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (750,378 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 189,292 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 189,292 |
|
| Conversion of debt | 300 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,656 | ) |
| Issuance of senior convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,873 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,873 |
|
| Stock options and restricted stock units assumed in acquisitions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,751 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,751 |
|
| Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards and other equity deductions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,366 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,366 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | 61,821 |
| | $ | 480 |
| | (9,888 | ) | | $ | (2,737,585 | ) | | $ | 4,923,196 |
| | $ | 6,640,505 |
| | $ | (259,902 | ) | | $ | 8,566,694 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,551,360 |
| | — |
| | 2,551,360 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax charge of $60,418 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (114,505 | ) | | (114,505 | ) |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax charge of $1,551 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 619,259 |
| | 619,259 |
|
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 329 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 329 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 219 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,849 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,851 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (2,540 | ) | | (3,089,055 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,089,055 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,133 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,133 |
|
| Conversion of debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (110,105 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (110,105 | ) |
| Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards and other equity deductions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 101,508 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 101,508 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | 62,040 |
| | $ | 482 |
| | (12,428 | ) | | $ | (5,826,640 | ) | | $ | 5,184,910 |
| | $ | 9,191,865 |
| | $ | 244,852 |
| | $ | 8,795,469 |
|
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,134,987 |
| | — |
| | 2,134,987 |
|
| Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax charge of $34,268 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (93,984 | ) | | (93,984 | ) |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax charge of $15,313 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (285,552 | ) | | (285,552 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (28,538 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (28,538 | ) |
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 339 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,569 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15,572 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (763 | ) | | (1,028,524 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,028,524 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,726 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 249,726 |
|
| Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards and other equity deductions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,986 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 60,986 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | 62,379 |
| | $ | 485 |
| | (13,191 | ) | | $ | (6,855,164 | ) | | $ | 5,482,653 |
| | $ | 11,326,852 |
| | $ | (134,684 | ) | | $ | 9,820,142 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | $ | 2,134,987 |
| | $ | 2,551,360 |
| | $ | 2,421,753 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
| Depreciation | | 140,059 |
| | 101,517 |
| | 78,241 |
|
| Amortization | | 169,076 |
| | 170,977 |
| | 129,579 |
|
| Provision for uncollectible accounts, net | | 46,241 |
| | 24,324 |
| | 22,990 |
|
| Deferred income tax expense (benefit) | | (111,905 | ) | | (61,335 | ) | | 31,707 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense and other stock-based payments | | 249,726 |
| | 249,133 |
| | 189,292 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | | 7,758 |
| | 7,578 |
| | 5,229 |
|
| Amortization of debt discount | | 68,974 |
| | 66,687 |
| | 54,731 |
|
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | 3 |
| | 6,270 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill | | 940,700 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Impairment of cost-method investments | | 63,208 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Accounts receivable | | (284,221 | ) | | (68,694 | ) | | (182,209 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 5,495 |
| | (81,611 | ) | | (48,932 | ) |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 516,356 |
| | 166,201 |
| | 203,870 |
|
| Other | | (21,757 | ) | | (23,909 | ) | | 1,876 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | 3,924,697 |
| | 3,102,231 |
| | 2,914,397 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Purchase of investments | | (6,741,202 | ) | | (8,669,690 | ) | | (10,552,214 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | | 3,684,103 |
| | 5,084,238 |
| | 10,902,500 |
|
| Additions to property and equipment | | (219,889 | ) | | (173,915 | ) | | (131,504 | ) |
| Acquisitions and other investments, net of cash acquired | | (7,813 | ) | | (140,338 | ) | | (2,496,366 | ) |
| Acquisition of land use rights | | (48,494 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from foreign currency contracts | | — |
| | 453,818 |
| | 14,354 |
|
| Payments on foreign currency contracts | | — |
| | (448,640 | ) | | (94,661 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (3,333,295 | ) | | (3,894,527 | ) | | (2,357,891 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Proceeds from revolving credit facility | | — |
| | 225,000 |
| | 995,000 |
|
| Payments related to revolving credit facility | | — |
| | (225,000 | ) | | (995,000 | ) |
| Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | | 994,705 |
| | 2,399,034 |
| | 2,264,753 |
|
| Payment of debt issuance costs - revolving credit facility | | — |
| | (4,005 | ) | | — |
|
| Payments related to conversion of senior notes | | — |
| | (147,629 | ) | | (125,136 | ) |
| Repurchase of common stock | | (1,013,526 | ) | | (3,089,055 | ) | | (750,378 | ) |
| Payments of contingent consideration | | — |
| | (10,700 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | 15,572 |
| | 20,851 |
| | 16,389 |
|
| Excess tax benefits on stock-based awards and other equity deductions | | 60,986 |
| | 101,508 |
| | 23,366 |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 57,737 |
| | (729,996 | ) | | 1,428,994 |
|
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | (45,203 | ) | | (149,131 | ) | | (136,476 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | 603,936 |
| | (1,671,423 | ) | | 1,849,024 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period | | 1,478,071 |
| | 3,149,494 |
| | 1,300,470 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period | | $ | 2,082,007 |
| | $ | 1,478,071 |
| | $ | 3,149,494 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash paid during the period for income taxes | | $ | 636,550 |
| | $ | 534,105 |
| | $ | 491,530 |
|
| Cash paid during the period for interest | | $ | 125,912 |
| | $ | 54,299 |
| | $ | 16,950 |
|
| Non-cash investing activity for contingent consideration | | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,170 |
| | $ | 10,700 |
|
| Non-cash financing activity for acquisitions | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 13,751 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Priceline Group Inc. ("The Priceline Group" or the "Company") helps people experience the world by providing consumers, travel service providers and restaurants with leading travel and restaurant online reservation and related services. Through its online travel companies ("OTCs"), the Company connects consumers wishing to make travel reservations with providers of travel services around the world. The Company is the leader in the worldwide online accommodation reservation market based on room nights booked. The Company offers consumers a broad array of accommodation reservations (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties) through its Booking.com, priceline.com and agoda.com brands. The Company's priceline.com brand also offers consumers reservations for rental cars, airline tickets, vacation packages and cruises. The Company offers rental car reservations worldwide through Rentalcars.com. The Company also allows consumers to easily compare airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information from hundreds of travel websites at once through KAYAK. The Company provides restaurants with reservation management services and consumers with the ability to make restaurant reservations at participating restaurants through OpenTable, a leading provider of online restaurant reservations.
| |
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation — The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including OpenTable, Inc. ("OpenTable") since its acquisition in July 2014. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes thereto. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. The estimates underlying the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements relate to, among other things, stock-based compensation, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of goodwill, long-lived assets and intangibles, income taxes, the accrual for loyalty programs and the accrual for travel transaction taxes.
Reclassifications — Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company's financial instruments, including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred merchant bookings, are carried at cost which approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. See Notes 4, 5 and 10 for information on fair value for investments, derivatives, and the Company's outstanding Senior Notes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents consists primarily of cash and highly liquid investment grade securities with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are recognized based on settlement date.
Restricted Cash — Restricted cash at December 31, 2016 and 2015 collateralizes office leases. In 2016, the Company changed the presentation of restricted cash on the balance sheet to include it in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets." The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 was adjusted to conform with this change.
The following table shows a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total amount shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| As included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 2,081,075 |
| | $ | 1,477,265 |
| | $ | 3,148,651 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 932 |
| | 806 |
| | 843 |
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | | $ | 2,082,007 |
| | $ | 1,478,071 |
| | $ | 3,149,494 |
|
Investments — The Company has classified its investments in debt securities and equity securities with readily determinable fair value as available-for-sale securities. These securities are recognized based on trade date and carried at estimated fair value with the aggregate unrealized gains and losses related to these investments, net of taxes, reflected as a part of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" within stockholders' equity.
The fair value of the investments is based on the specific quoted market price of the securities or comparable securities at the balance sheet dates. Investments in debt securities are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary because the Company either intends to sell or it is more-likely-than not that it will have to sell the impaired security before recovery. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. If the Company does not intend to sell the debt security, but it is probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due, then only the impairment due to the credit risk would be recognized in earnings and the remaining amount of the impairment would be recognized in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" within stockholders' equity. Marketable securities are presented as current assets on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets if they are available to meet short-term working capital needs of the Company. Marketable debt securities not held to meet short-term working capital needs of the Company are classified as short-term or long-term investments on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the maturity date of the debt security. See Notes 4 and 5 for further detail of investments.
Equity investments without readily determinable fair values, in companies over which the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for using the cost method of accounting and classified within "Other assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under the cost method, investments are carried at cost and are adjusted to fair value only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value.
Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, when applicable, the life of the lease related to leasehold improvements, whichever is shorter.
Building Construction-in-progress — Building construction-in-progress is associated with the construction of an office building in the Netherlands and is included in “Property and equipment, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016. Depreciation of the building and its related components will commence once it is ready for the Company’s use.
Website and Internal-use Software Capitalization — Certain direct development costs associated with website and internal-use software are capitalized and include external direct costs of services and payroll costs for employees devoting time to the software projects principally related to website and mobile app development, including support systems, software coding, designing system interfaces and installation and testing of the software. These costs are recorded as property and equipment and are generally amortized over a period of two to five years beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional features or functionality are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the enhancements. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred. Additions to capitalized costs during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $54.2 million, $44.2 million and $20.9 million, respectively. Costs capitalized in 2016 were higher than in 2015 primarily related to activity for agoda.com. Costs for 2015 reflect a full year of activity for OpenTable compared to a partial year's activity in 2014 and higher development costs for priceline.com.
Land use rights—Land use rights represent prepayments for the lease of land where the Company is constructing an office building in the Netherlands. The land use rights are recorded as rent expense in "General and administrative" expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease period. At December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $45.3 million associated with land use rights recorded in “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 14 for further details.
Goodwill — The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements reflect an acquired business starting at the date of the acquisition.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization and is reviewed at least annually for impairment, or earlier if an event occurs or circumstances change and there is an indication of impairment. The Company tests goodwill at a reporting unit level. The fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair values are determined using a
combination of standard valuation techniques, including an income approach (discounted cash flows) and market approaches (EBITDA multiples of comparable publicly-traded companies and precedent transactions) and based on market participant assumptions. An impairment is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill. See Note 9 for further information.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets — The Company reviews long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based upon the Company's ability to recover the carrying value of the assets from the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, before interest and taxes, of the related operations. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over the present value of estimated future cash flows, using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved and based on assumptions representative of market participants.
Agency Revenues
Agency revenues are derived from travel-related transactions where the Company does not facilitate payments for the travel services provided. Agency revenues consist primarily of accommodation reservation commissions, as well as certain global distribution system ("GDS") reservation booking fees and travel insurance fees, and are reported at the net amounts received, without any associated cost of revenue. Such revenues are primarily recognized by the Company when the customer's travel is completed.
Merchant Revenues
Merchant revenues are derived from services where the Company facilitates payments for the travel services provided. Name Your Own Price®travel reservation services are presented in the income statement on a gross basis so merchant revenue and costs of revenues include the reservation price to the customer and the cost charged by the service provider, respectively. For all other merchant transactions, the Company presents merchant revenue on a net basis in the income statement.
Merchant revenue also includes ancillary fees, including damage excess waiver and travel insurance and certain GDS reservation booking fees, customer processing fees associated with priceline.com's opaque reservation services and merchant retail accommodation reservation services at priceline.com and agoda.com and are generally recognized by the Company when the customer completes his/her travel.
Merchant Retail Services: Merchant revenues for the Company's merchant retail services are derived from transactions where customers book accommodation reservations or rental car reservations from travel service providers at disclosed rates which are subject to contractual arrangements. The Company charges the customer at the time of booking and any amounts owed to the travel service provider along with the Company's deferred revenue are included in deferred merchant bookings. Reservations are generally refundable upon cancellation, subject to cancellation penalties in certain cases. Merchant revenue and the cost charged by travel service provider for priceline.com, agoda.com and Rentalcars.com are recognized when the customer completes their travel. Revenue for Booking.com's merchant transactions is comprised of accommodation reservation commissions which are recognized when the customer completes their travel.
Merchant Opaque Services: The Company describes its priceline.com Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® travel services as "opaque" because certain elements of the service, including the identity of the travel service provider, are not disclosed to the consumer prior to making a reservation. The Name Your Own Price® service connects consumers that are willing to accept a level of flexibility regarding their travel itinerary with travel service providers that are willing to accept a lower price in order to sell their excess capacity without disrupting their existing distribution channels or retail pricing structures. The Company's Name Your Own Price® services use a pricing system that allows consumers to "bid" the price they are prepared to pay when submitting an offer for a particular travel service. The Company accesses databases in which participating travel service providers file secure discounted rates, not generally available to the public, to determine whether it can fulfill the consumer's offer. The Company selects the travel service provider and determines the price it will accept from the consumer. Express Deals® allows consumers to select hotel, rental car and airline ticket reservations with price and certain information regarding amenities disclosed prior to making the reservation. The Company recognizes revenues and costs for these services when it confirms the customer's non-refundable offer. In circumstances where the Company makes certain customer concessions, the Company accrues for such estimated losses.
Pursuant to the terms of the Company's retail and opaque merchant services, its travel service providers are permitted to bill the Company for the underlying cost of the service during a specified period of time. In the event that the Company is not billed by the travel provider within the specified time period, the Company reduces its cost by the unbilled amounts.
Advertising and Other Revenues
Advertising and other revenues are primarily earned by KAYAK and OpenTable and to a lesser extent by priceline.com for advertising placements on its website and Booking.com's BookingSuite branded accommodation marketing and business analytics services. KAYAK earns advertising revenue primarily by sending referrals to OTCs and travel service providers and from advertising placements on its websites and mobile apps. Revenue related to referrals is earned when a customer clicks on a referral placement or upon completion of the travel. Revenue for advertising placements is earned based upon when a customer clicks on an advertisement or when KAYAK displays an advertisement. OpenTable earns reservation fees when diners are seated through its online restaurant reservation service and subscription fees for restaurant management services on a straight-line basis over the contractual period that the service is provided.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists primarily of the cost paid to travel service providers for priceline.com's Name Your Own Price® and vacation package reservation services, net of applicable taxes and charges, and fees paid to third parties by KAYAK and priceline.com to return travel itinerary information for consumer search queries.
Loyalty Programs
The Company provides various loyalty programs. Participating customers earn loyalty points on current transactions that can be redeemed for future qualifying transactions. When the points are earned, the Company estimates the amount of loyalty points expected to be redeemed and records a reduction in revenue. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, a liability of $84.4 million and $71.1 million, respectively, for loyalty points programs was included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Tax Recovery Charge, Occupancy Taxes and State and Local Taxes
The Company provides an online travel service to facilitate online travel purchases by consumers from travel service providers, including accommodation, rental car and airline ticket reservations, and sometimes as part of a vacation package reservation. For merchant transactions, the Company charges the consumer an amount intended to cover the taxes that the Company anticipates the travel service provider will owe and remit to the local taxing authorities ("tax recovery charge"). Tax rate information for calculating the tax recovery charge is provided to the Company by the travel service providers.
In certain taxing jurisdictions, the Company is required by statute or court order to collect and remit certain taxes (local occupancy tax, general excise and/or sales tax) imposed upon its margin and/or service fee. The tax recovery charge and occupancy and other related taxes collected from customers and remitted to those jurisdictions are reported on a net basis in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Except in those jurisdictions, the Company does not charge the customer or remit occupancy or other related taxes based on its margin or service fee (see Note 14).
Performance Advertising — Advertising expenses classified as performance advertising are generally managed by the Company by monitoring return on investment. These expenses primarily consist of: (1) search engine keyword purchases; (2) referrals from meta-search and travel research websites; (3) affiliate programs; and (4) other performance-based advertisements. Performance advertising expense is recognized as incurred. Included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are accrued performance advertising liabilities of $267.5 million and $188.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Brand Advertising — Advertising expenses classified as brand advertising are generally managed by the Company to a targeted spending level to drive brand awareness. This includes both online and offline activities such as online videos (for example, on YouTube and Facebook), television advertising, billboards and subway and bus advertisements. Brand advertising expense is generally recognized as incurred with the exception of advertising production costs, which are expensed the first time the advertisement is displayed or broadcast.
In 2016, the Company changed the presentation of advertising expenses from "Advertising - Online" and "Advertising - Offline" to "Performance advertising" and "Brand advertising" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This change in presentation had no impact on total advertising expenses, operating income or net income. As a result, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, brand advertising in online channels of $59.0 million and $25.8 million , respectively, is now recorded in "Brand advertising" rather than "Advertising - Online". The Company believes its new presentation is helpful because it separates performance advertising that is typically managed on a return on investment basis from brand advertising
that is generally spent to build brand awareness and managed to a targeted spending level. See above for the descriptions and accounting policies of performance advertising and brand advertising.
Sales and Marketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of (1) credit card and other payment processing fees associated with merchant transactions; (2) fees paid to third parties that provide call center, website content translations and other services; (3) customer relations costs; (4) public relations costs; (5) provisions for bad debt, primarily related to agency accommodation commission receivables; and (6) provisions for customer chargebacks.
Personnel — Personnel expenses consist of compensation to the Company's personnel, including salaries, stock-based compensation, bonuses, payroll taxes and employee health benefits. Included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are accrued compensation liabilities of $242.6 million and $186.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation is recognized in the financial statements based upon fair value. The fair value of performance share units and restricted stock units is determined based on the number of units granted and the quoted price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date or acquisition date. Stock-based compensation related to performance share units reflects the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period. The fair value of employee stock options assumed in acquisitions was determined using the Black Scholes model and the market value of the Company's common stock at the respective acquisition dates. Fair value is recognized as expense on a straight line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the employee requisite service period (see "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" described later in this footnote for accounting changes that are effective January 1, 2017).
The benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs are reported as a credit to additional paid-in capital and as financing cash flows, but only when such excess tax benefits are realized by a reduction to current taxes payable. See Note 3 for further information on stock-based awards.
Information Technology — Information technology expenses consist primarily of: (1) software license and system maintenance fees; (2) data communications and other expenses associated with operating our services; (3) outsourced data center costs; and (4) payments to outside consultants.
Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. The Company records the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred taxes are classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet.
The Company records deferred tax assets to the extent it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability considering historical profitability, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, and tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the period in which related temporary differences become deductible. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, significant judgments, estimates, and interpretation of statutes are required.
Deferred taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of such change.
Income taxes are not accrued for unremitted earnings of international subsidiaries that have been or are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States.
The Company recognizes liabilities when it believes that uncertain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by the tax authorities. Liabilities recognized for uncertain tax positions are based on a two step approach for recognition and measurement. First, the Company evaluates the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit based on its technical merits. Secondly, the Companymeasures the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Interest and penalties attributable to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recognized as a component of income tax expense. See Note 13 for further details on income taxes.
Segment Reporting — The Company determined that its brands constitute its operating segments. The Company's Booking.com brand represents a substantial majority of gross profit and net income. Based on similar economic characteristics and other similar operating factors, the Company has aggregated the operating segments into one reportable segment. For geographic information, see Note 16.
Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is generally their respective local currency. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of exchange existing at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates applicable for the period. Translation gains and losses are included as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In November 2015, the Company issued Senior Notes due November 25, 2022 for an aggregate principal amount of 750 million Euros. In March 2015, the Company issued Senior Notes due March 3, 2027 for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros. In September 2014, the Company issued Senior Notes due September 23, 2024 for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros. The Company designated the carrying value, plus accrued interest, of these Euro-denominated Senior Notes as a hedge of the Company's net investment in Euro functional currency subsidiaries. The foreign currency transaction gains or losses on these liabilities and the foreign currency translation gains or losses from translating the Euro-denominated net assets of these subsidiaries into U.S. Dollars are included as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Notes 10 and 12).
Derivative Financial Instruments — As a result of the Company's international operations, it is exposed to various market risks that may affect its consolidated results of operations, cash flow and financial position. These market risks include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in currency exchange rates. The Company's primary foreign currency exposures are in Euros and British Pound Sterling, in which it conducts a significant portion of its business activities. As a result, the Company faces exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of its international operations are translated from local currencies into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains and losses that are reflected in income.
The Company may enter into derivative instruments to hedge certain net exposures of nonfunctional currency denominated assets and liabilities and the volatility associated with translating earnings for its international businesses into U.S. Dollars, even though it does not elect to apply hedge accounting or hedge accounting does not apply. Gains and losses resulting from a change in fair value for these derivatives are reflected in income in the period in which the change occurs and are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in "Foreign currency transactions and other." Cash flows related to these contracts are classified within "Net cash provided by operating activities" on the cash flow statement.
The Company, from time to time, utilizes derivative instruments to hedge the impact of changes in currency exchange rates on the net assets of its foreign subsidiaries. These instruments are designated as net investment hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness is assessed and measured based on changes in forward exchange rates. The Company records gains and losses on these derivative instruments as currency translation adjustments, which offset a portion of the translation adjustments related to the foreign subsidiaries' net assets. Gains and losses are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and will be realized upon a partial sale or liquidation of the investment. The Company formally documents all derivatives designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, both at hedge inception and on an on-going basis. These net investment hedges expose the Company to liquidity risk as the derivatives have an immediate cash flow impact upon maturity, which is not offset by the translation of the underlying hedged equity. The cash flows from these contracts are classified within "Net cash used in investing activities" on the cash flow statement.
The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value and its derivative instruments are generally short-term in duration. The derivative instruments do not contain leverage features.
The Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative instruments may fail to meet their contractual obligations. The Company regularly reviews its credit exposure as well as assessing the creditworthiness of its counterparties. See Note 5 for further detail on derivatives.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a new accounting update to simplify the test for goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2, which measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation, with the carrying amount of that reporting unit’s goodwill. Under this update, an entity would perform its quantitative annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test using the current Step 1 test and recognize an impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value of a reporting unit over its fair value.
For public business entities, this update is effective for their annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests occurring after January 1, 2017. The accounting update will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating when it will adopt this update and what the impact upon adoption will be, if any.
Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued a new accounting update to clarify the definition of a business and provide additional guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as asset acquisitions (or disposals) or business combinations (or disposals of a business). Under this update, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this criterion is met, the transaction should be accounted for as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination. This distinction is important because the accounting for an asset acquisition significantly differs from the accounting for a business combination. This update eliminates the requirement to evaluate whether a market participant could replace missing elements (e.g. inputs or processes), narrows the definition of outputs and requires that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs.
For public business entities, this update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The accounting update will be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to early adopt this update in the first quarter of 2017 and does not expect a significant impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restricted Cash
In November 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting update on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows to address the diversity in practice. This accounting update requires entities to show changes in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on a combined basis in the statement of cash flows. In addition, this accounting guidance requires a reconciliation of the total cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash in the statement of cash flows to the related captions in the balance sheet if cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash are presented in more than one line item in the balance sheet.
This accounting update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including those interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company early adopted this accounting update in the fourth quarter of 2016 and applied it retrospectively to all prior periods presented, therefore, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were adjusted. See the section above on accounting policies related to "Restricted Cash" for the reconciliation of cash, cash equivalent and restricted cash reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Intra-entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
In October 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on income tax accounting associated with intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. This accounting update, which is part of the FASB's simplification initiative, is intended to reduce diversity in practice and the complexity of tax accounting, particularly for those transfers involving intellectual property. This new guidance requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.
For public business entities, this update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities are required to apply this accounting update on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment to
retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company expects to early adopt this update in the first quarter of 2017 and the adoption of this accounting update will have an insignificant impact to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on the measurement of credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost, which includes accounts receivable and available-for-sale debt securities. For financial assets measured at amortized cost, this new guidance requires an entity to (1) estimate its lifetime expected credit losses upon recognition of the financial assets and establish an allowance to present the net amount expected to be collected, (2) recognize this allowance and changes in the allowance during subsequent periods through net income and (3) consider relevant information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts in assessing the lifetime expected credit losses. For available-for-sale debt securities, this new guidance made several targeted amendments to the existing other-than-temporary impairment model, including (1) requiring disclosure of the allowance for credit losses, (2) allowing reversals of the previously recognized credit losses until the entity has the intent to sell, is more-likely-than-not required to sell the securities or the maturity of the securities, (3) limiting impairment to the difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value and (4) not allowing entities to consider the length of time that fair value has been less than amortized cost as a factor in evaluating whether a credit loss exists.
This update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Entities are required to apply this accounting update on a modified retrospective basis with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements of adopting this new guidance.
Share-based Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to improve the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payment transactions as part of its simplification initiative. The key provisions of this accounting update are: (1) recognizing current excess tax benefits in the income statement in the period the benefits are deducted on the income tax return as opposed to an adjustment to additional paid-in capital in the period the benefits are realized by reducing a current income tax liability; (2) allowing an entity-wide election to account for forfeitures related to service conditions as they occur instead of estimating the total number of awards that will be forfeited because the requisite service period will not be rendered; (3) allowing the net settlement of an equity award for employee statutory tax withholding purposes to not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate by relevant tax jurisdiction instead of withholding taxes for each employee based on a minimum statutory withholding tax rate; and (4) requiring the presentation of excess tax benefits as operating cash flow and cash payments for employee statutory tax withholding related to vested stock awards as financing cash flow in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Under this new accounting standard, all previously unrecognized equity deductions will be recognized as a deferred tax asset, net of any valuation allowance, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption of this standard.
For public business entities, this update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption was permitted. The Company will adopt this accounting update in the first quarter of 2017. The Company will record a deferred tax asset of approximately $300 million related to previously unrecognized U.S. equity deductions, with an offsetting cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2017. The Company will elect to account for forfeitures related to service conditions as they occur, as a result, there will be a cumulative net charge to retained earnings for $7.0 million (forfeiture true-up adjustment less deferred tax benefit) and recognition of deferred tax assets for $2.0 million, with an offsetting credit to additional paid-in capital for $9.0 million. In addition, the Company will elect to change the presentation of excess tax benefits in the consolidated statements of cash flows for periods prior to January 1, 2017 to reflect these excess tax benefits in operating cash flows instead of financing cash flows.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting standard intended to improve the financial reporting of lease transactions. The new accounting standard requires lessees to recognize an asset and a liability on the balance sheet for the right and obligation created by entering into a lease transaction for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. The new standard retains the dual-model concept by requiring entities to determine if a lease is an operating or financing lease and the
current "bright line" percentages could be used as guidance in applying the new standard. The lessor accounting model remains largely unchanged. The new standard significantly expands qualitative and quantitative disclosures for lessees.
The update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is allowed. Entities are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact to its Consolidated Financial Statements of adopting this new guidance.
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Instruments
In January 2016, the FASB issued a new accounting update which amends the guidance on the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The update requires (1) an entity to measure equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income rather than accumulated other comprehensive income (loss); (2) allows an entity to elect to measure those equity investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value at cost less impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (3) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; and (4) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s evaluation of their other deferred tax assets.
This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption, although allowed in certain circumstances, is not applicable to the Company. An entity would apply this update by a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. After the adoption of this new accounting guidance, in the first quarter of 2018, the Company will record fair value changes in its investments in Ctrip equity securities in net income, which could vary significantly quarter to quarter (see Note 4 for their carrying values and fair values of these equity investments). In addition, the Company intends to continue to use the cost method of accounting for equity investments without a readily determinable fair value.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers that was designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and jurisdictions. The core principle of this standard is that an "entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services." The new standard also requires enhanced disclosures on the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue from contracts with customers. Since May 2014, the FASB has issued several amendments to this standard, including additional guidance, and deferred the effective date for public business entities to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
The Company will adopt this new standard in the first quarter of 2018 by applying the modified retrospective transition approach, which means that revenues for 2016 and 2017 will be reported on a historical basis and revenues for 2018 will be reported on the new basis and historical basis. Based on the Company's preliminary analysis, the revenue standard is expected to change the timing of revenue recognition for travel reservation services, but the Company does not currently expect material impacts to its annual gross profit or net income, although the effects on quarterly gross profit and net income may be more significant. In addition, the adoption of the revenue standard is expected to change the presentation of Name Your Own Price® revenue from "gross" to "net" reporting, which will decrease revenue and cost of revenue equally, but have no impact on gross profit or net income.
| |
3. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company's 1999 Omnibus Plan, as amended and restated effective June 6, 2013, (the "1999 Plan") is the primary stock compensation plan from which broad-based employee equity awards may be made. As of December 31, 2016, there were 2,292,522 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 1999 Plan. In addition, under plans assumed in connection with various acquisitions, there were 107,637 shares of common stock available for future grant as of December 31, 2016.
Stock-based compensation issued under the plans generally consists of restricted stock units, performance share units and stock options. Restricted stock units and performance share units generally vest over periods from 1 to 3 years. Stock
options granted to employees generally have a term of 10 years. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units and the exercise of stock options. See Note 2 for the Company's accounting policy on stock-based compensation.
Stock-based compensation included in personnel expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was approximately $249.6 million, $247.4 million and $186.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 includes charges amounting to $20.7 million, $22.6 million and $20.6 million, respectively, representing the impact of adjusting the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period for outstanding unvested performance share units. Included in stock-based compensation are approximately $2.6 million, $2.6 million, and $2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, for restricted stock units awarded to non-employee directors. The related tax benefit for stock-based compensation is $45.3 million, $52.9 million and $38.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units
The following table summarizes the activity of restricted stock units and performance share units ("share-based awards") during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Share-based Awards | | Shares | Weighted-average Grant Date Fair Value |
| | | | | | |
| Unvested at December 31, 2013 | | 534,319 |
| | $ | 615.10 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 128,484 |
| | $ | 1,308.13 |
| |
| Assumed in an acquisition | | 43,993 |
| | $ | 1,238.68 |
| |
| Vested | | (195,730 | ) | | $ | 492.22 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 68,499 |
| | $ | 1,085.94 |
| |
| Forfeited/Canceled | | (9,250 | ) | | $ | 972.19 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2014 | | 570,315 |
| | $ | 912.26 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 198,141 |
| | $ | 1,226.41 |
| |
| Vested | | (161,862 | ) | | $ | 757.66 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 64,328 |
| | $ | 1,238.30 |
| |
| Forfeited/Canceled | | (33,665 | ) | | $ | 1,151.70 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2015 | | 637,257 |
| | $ | 1,070.10 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 202,740 |
| | $ | 1,314.93 |
| |
| Vested | | (298,753 | ) | | $ | 858.23 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 52,224 |
| | $ | 1,294.84 |
| |
| Forfeited/Canceled | | (77,862 | ) | | $ | 1,278.06 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2016 | | 515,606 |
| | $ | 1,287.88 |
| |
Share-based awards granted by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 had aggregate grant date fair values of approximately $266.6 million, $243.0 million and $168.1 million, respectively. Share-based awards that vested during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 had grant date fair values of $256.4 million, $122.6 million and $96.3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, there was $320.0 million of total future compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made broad-based grants of 117,005 restricted stock units that generally have a three-year vesting period, subject to certain exceptions for terminations other than for "cause," for "good reason" or on account of death or disability. These share-based awards had a total grant date fair value of $154.9 million based on a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $1,324.21.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 85,735 performance share units to executives and certain other employees. The performance share units had a total grant date fair value of $111.7 million based upon a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $1,302.25. The performance share units are payable in shares of the Company's common stock upon vesting. Subject to certain exceptions for terminations other than for "cause," for "good reason" or on account of death or disability, recipients of these performance share units generally must continue their service through the requisite service period in order to receive any shares. Stock-based compensation related to performance share units reflects the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period. The actual number of shares to be issued on the vesting date will be determined upon completion of the performance period which generally ends December 31, 2018, assuming there is no accelerated vesting for, among other things, a termination of employment under certain circumstances. As of December 31, 2016, the estimated number of probable shares to be issued is a total of 118,132 shares, net of performance share units forfeited and vested since the grant date. If the maximum performance thresholds are met at the end of the performance period, a maximum number of 172,930 total shares could be issued. If the minimum performance thresholds are not met, 45,962 shares would be issued at the end of the performance period.
2015 Performance Share Units
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 107,623 performance share units with a grant date fair value of $133.2 million, based on a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $1,237.53. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined upon completion of the performance period which generally ends December 31, 2017, assuming there is no accelerated vesting for, among other things, a termination of employment under certain circumstances.
At December 31, 2016, there were 75,929 unvested 2015 performance share units outstanding, net of performance share units that were forfeited or vested since the grant date. As of December 31, 2016, the number of shares estimated to be issued pursuant to these performance share units at the end of the performance period is a total of 131,844 shares. If the maximum performance thresholds are met at the end of the performance period, a maximum of 188,240 total shares could be issued pursuant to these performance share units. If the minimum performance thresholds are not met, 43,953 shares would be issued at the end of the performance period.
2014 Performance Share Units
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company granted 72,277 performance share units with a grant date fair value of $96.1 million, based on a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $1,329.11. The actual number of shares to be issued will be determined based upon completion of the performance period which ended December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2016, there were 43,428 unvested 2014 performance share units outstanding, net of performance share units that were forfeited or vested since the grant date. As of December 31, 2016, the total number of shares expected to be issued pursuant to these performance share units during 2017 is 70,474 shares.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes the activity for stock options during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee Stock Options | | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000's) | | Weighted-average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) |
| Balance, December 31, 2013 | | 137,708 |
| | | $ | 315.36 |
| | | $ | 116,686 |
| | 6.6 |
| Assumed in acquisitions | | 61,897 |
| | | $ | 457.67 |
| | | | | |
| Exercised | | (51,003 | ) | | | $ | 293.59 |
| | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (2,217 | ) | | | $ | 517.91 |
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | | 146,385 |
| | | $ | 380.05 |
| | | $ | 111,277 |
| | 6.5 |
| Assumed in acquisitions | | 1,422 |
| | | $ | 230.37 |
| | | | | |
| Exercised | | (52,697 | ) | | | $ | 355.85 |
| | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (6,006 | ) | | | $ | 511.87 |
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2015 | | 89,104 |
| | | $ | 383.03 |
| | | $ | 79,474 |
| | 5.4 |
| Exercised | | (38,150 | ) | | | $ | 404.40 |
| | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (1,971 | ) | | | $ | 241.65 |
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2016 | | 48,983 |
| | | $ | 372.07 |
| | | $ | 53,587 |
| | 4.4 |
| Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016 | | 46,601 |
| | | $ | 351.22 |
| | | $ | 51,953 |
| | 4.3 |
| Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016 and expected to vest thereafter, net of estimated forfeitures | | 48,931 |
| | | $ | 372.11 |
| | | $ | 53,528 |
| | 4.4 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of employee stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $35.1 million, $46.3 million and $49.2 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, stock options assumed in acquisitions vested for 12,180, 38,689 and 41,524 shares with an acquisition-date fair value of $7.6 million, $24.4 million and $24.2 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options of $6.8 million, $24.9 million and $24.7 million, respectively. Employee stock options assumed in acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2015 had a total acquisition-date fair value of $1.4 million based on a weighted-average acquisition date fair value of $1,015.81 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2014, employee stock options assumed in acquisitions had a total acquisition date fair value of $45.5 million based on a weighted average acquisition date fair value of $734.76 per share. As of December 31, 2016, there was $1.3 million of total future compensation costs related to unvested employee stock options to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.0 year.
Short-term and Long-term Investments in Available for Sale Securities
See Note 2 for the Company's accounting policy related to its investments in available-for-sale securities. The following table summarizes, by major security type, the Company's investments as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| International government securities | $ | 249,552 |
| | $ | 221 |
| | $ | (89 | ) | | $ | 249,684 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 456,971 |
| | 57 |
| | (140 | ) | | 456,888 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | 1,510,119 |
| | 1,119 |
| | (928 | ) | | 1,510,310 |
|
| Commercial paper | 1,998 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,998 |
|
| Total short-term investments | $ | 2,218,640 |
| | $ | 1,397 |
| | $ | (1,157 | ) | | $ | 2,218,880 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| International government securities | $ | 655,857 |
| | $ | 4,110 |
| | $ | (623 | ) | | $ | 659,344 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 773,718 |
| | 337 |
| | (7,463 | ) | | 766,592 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | 6,042,271 |
| | 9,973 |
| | (50,455 | ) | | 6,001,789 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | 4,979 |
| | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 4,952 |
|
| Ctrip convertible debt securities | 1,275,000 |
| | 65,800 |
| | (47,712 | ) | | 1,293,088 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | 655,311 |
| | 213,233 |
| | (3,242 | ) | | 865,302 |
|
| Total long-term investments | $ | 9,407,136 |
| | $ | 293,453 |
| | $ | (109,522 | ) | | $ | 9,591,067 |
|
The Company's investment policy seeks to preserve capital and maintain sufficient liquidity to meet operational and other needs of the business. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted-average life of the Company’s fixed income investment portfolio, excluding the Company's investment in Ctrip convertible debt securities, was approximately 2.0 years with an average credit quality of A+/A1/A+.
The Company invests in international government securities with high credit quality. As of December 31, 2016, investments in international government securities principally included debt securities issued by the governments of the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany and Austria.
On August 7, 2014 and May 26, 2015, the Company invested $500 million and $250 million, respectively, in five-year senior convertible notes issued at par by Ctrip.com International Ltd. ("Ctrip"). On December 11, 2015, the Company invested $500 million in a Ctrip ten-year senior convertible note issued at par value, which included a put option allowing the Company to require a prepayment in cash from Ctrip at the end of the sixth year of the note. On September 12, 2016, the Company invested $25 million in a Ctrip six-year senior convertible note issued at par value, which included a put option allowing the Company to require prepayment in cash from Ctrip at the end of the third year of the note. The conversion feature associated with this September 2016 Ctrip convertible note met the definition of an embedded derivative (see Note 5). As of December 31, 2016, the Company had also invested $630.3 million and $25.0 million of its international cash in Ctrip American Depositary Shares ("ADSs") and Ctrip ordinary shares, respectively. The convertible debt and equity securities of Ctrip have been marked-to-market in accordance with the accounting guidance for available-for-sale securities.
In connection with the Company's investments in Ctrip's convertible notes, Ctrip granted the Company the right to appoint an observer to its board of directors and permission to acquire its shares (through the acquisition of Ctrip ADSs in the open market) so that combined with ADSs issuable upon conversion of the August 2014, May 2015 and September 2016 convertible notes and ordinary shares, the Company could hold up to an aggregate of approximately 15% of Ctrip's outstanding equity. As of December 31, 2016, the Company did not have significant influence over Ctrip.
The following table summarizes, by major security type, the Company's investments as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| International government securities | $ | 395,404 |
| | $ | 497 |
| | $ | (104 | ) | | $ | 395,797 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 457,001 |
| | — |
| | (507 | ) | | 456,494 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | 305,654 |
| | 25 |
| | (419 | ) | | 305,260 |
|
| Commercial paper | 11,688 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,688 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | 2,009 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 2,007 |
|
| Total short-term investments | $ | 1,171,756 |
| | $ | 522 |
| | $ | (1,032 | ) | | $ | 1,171,246 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| International government securities | $ | 718,947 |
| | $ | 1,367 |
| | $ | (683 | ) | | $ | 719,631 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 580,155 |
| | 277 |
| | (1,982 | ) | | 578,450 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | 4,294,282 |
| | 1,273 |
| | (18,941 | ) | | 4,276,614 |
|
| U.S. municipal securities | 1,080 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 1,083 |
|
| Ctrip convertible debt securities | 1,250,000 |
| | 158,600 |
| | (30,050 | ) | | 1,378,550 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | 630,311 |
| | 346,724 |
| | — |
| | 977,035 |
|
| Total long-term investments | $ | 7,474,775 |
| | $ | 508,244 |
| | $ | (51,656 | ) | | $ | 7,931,363 |
|
The Company recognized net realized gains of $1.1 million and $2.2 million related to investments for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. There were no significant realized gains or losses related to investments for the year ended December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2016, the Company does not consider any of its investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Cost-method Investments
The Company held investments in equity securities of private companies, which are typically at an early stage of development, of approximately $7.6 million and $62.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These investments are accounted for under the cost method and included in "Other assets" in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company evaluates its investments quarterly to determine if any indicators of other-than-temporary impairment exist.
In March 2016, the Company received an operating performance update from Hotel Urbano, which showed 2015 results significantly below expectations, significantly reduced forecasts and the need for additional funding in the near term. This update combined with increased political turmoil, the declaration of a public health emergency related to the Zika virus and sustained poor macroeconomic conditions in Brazil in the first quarter of 2016 indicated a potential other-than-temporary impairment in the fair value of the Company’s investment. As a result, the Company analyzed all information available and based on the best estimate of the fair value of this investment, recognized an impairment of approximately $50 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. In the second quarter of 2016, after discussions with Hotel Urbano's management, the Company reviewed their additional funding needs and based on its business prospects, the Company recognized an impairment of approximately $10 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to write-off the remainder of its investment in Hotel Urbano. In addition, the Company recognized an impairment of approximately $3 million for an investment in another private company during the three months ended June 30, 2016.
There has been no further identified events or changes in circumstances to indicate a potential impairment with the Company's cost-method investments as of December 31, 2016.
| |
| 5. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2016 are classified in the categories described in the tables below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| ASSETS: | | | | | | |
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | |
| Money market funds | | $ | 977,468 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 977,468 |
|
| International government securities | | — |
| | 30,266 |
| | 30,266 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 176,140 |
| | 176,140 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 9,273 |
| | 9,273 |
|
| Commercial paper | | — |
| | 1,998 |
| | 1,998 |
|
| Time deposits | | 49,160 |
| | — |
| | 49,160 |
|
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | |
| International government securities | | — |
| | 249,684 |
| | 249,684 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 456,888 |
| | 456,888 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 1,510,310 |
| | 1,510,310 |
|
| Commercial paper | | — |
| | 1,998 |
| | 1,998 |
|
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | |
| International government securities | | — |
| | 659,344 |
| | 659,344 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 766,592 |
| | 766,592 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 6,001,789 |
| | 6,001,789 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | | — |
| | 4,952 |
| | 4,952 |
|
| Ctrip convertible debt securities | | — |
| | 1,293,088 |
| | 1,293,088 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | | 865,302 |
| | — |
| | 865,302 |
|
| Derivatives: | | | | | | |
| Currency exchange derivatives | | — |
| | 756 |
| | 756 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | | $ | 1,891,930 |
| | $ | 11,163,078 |
| | $ | 13,055,008 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| LIABILITIES: | | | | | | |
| Currency exchange derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,015 |
| | $ | 1,015 |
|
Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2015 are classified in the categories described in the tables below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| ASSETS: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | |
| Money market funds | | $ | 99,117 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 99,117 |
|
| International government securities | | — |
| | 10,659 |
| | 10,659 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 90,441 |
| | 90,441 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 1,855 |
| | 1,855 |
|
| Commercial paper | | — |
| | 335,663 |
| | 335,663 |
|
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | |
| International government securities | | — |
| | 395,797 |
| | 395,797 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 456,494 |
| | 456,494 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 305,260 |
| | 305,260 |
|
| Commercial paper | | — |
| | 11,688 |
| | 11,688 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | | — |
| | 2,007 |
| | 2,007 |
|
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | |
| International government securities | | — |
| | 719,631 |
| | 719,631 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 578,450 |
| | 578,450 |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 4,276,614 |
| | 4,276,614 |
|
| U.S. municipal securities | | — |
| | 1,083 |
| | 1,083 |
|
| Ctrip convertible debt securities | | — |
| | 1,378,550 |
| | 1,378,550 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | | 977,035 |
| | — |
| | 977,035 |
|
| Derivatives: | | | | | | |
| Currency exchange derivatives | | — |
| | 363 |
| | 363 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | | $ | 1,076,152 |
| | $ | 8,564,555 |
| | $ | 9,640,707 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| LIABILITIES: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Currency exchange derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 644 |
| | $ | 644 |
|
There are three levels of inputs to measure fair value. The definition of each input is described below:
| |
Level 1: | Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible by the Company at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. |
| |
Level 2: | Inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Such prices may be based upon quoted prices for identical or comparable securities in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. |
| |
Level 3: | Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. |
Investments in corporate debt securities, U.S. and international government securities, commercial paper, government agency securities, convertible debt securities and municipal securities are considered "Level 2" valuations because the Company has access to quoted prices, but does not have visibility to the volume and frequency of trading for all of these investments. For the Company's investments, a market approach is used for recurring fair value measurements and the valuation techniques use inputs that are observable, or can be corroborated by observable data, in an active marketplace.
The Company's derivative instruments are valued using pricing models. Pricing models take into account the contract terms as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as interest rate yield curves, option volatility and currency rates. Derivatives are considered "Level 2" fair value measurements. The Company's derivative instruments are typically short-term in nature.
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company's cash consisted of bank deposits. Other financial assets and liabilities, including restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred merchant bookings are carried at cost which approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company held investments in equity securities of private companies of approximately $7.6 million and $62.3 million, respectively, and these investments are accounted for under the cost method of accounting (see Note 4). See Note 4 for information on the carrying value of available-for-sale investments, Note 10 for the estimated fair value of the Company's outstanding Senior Notes and Note 18 for the Company's contingent liabilities associated with business acquisitions.
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivatives. See Note 2 for the Company's accounting policy on derivative financial instruments.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments — The Company is exposed to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the operating results of its international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation. The Company enters into average-rate derivative contracts to hedge translation risk from short-term foreign exchange rate fluctuations for the Euro, British Pound Sterling and certain other currencies versus the U.S. Dollar. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no outstanding derivative contracts related to foreign currency translation risk. Foreign exchange gains of $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, foreign exchange losses of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and foreign exchange gains of $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, were recorded related to these derivatives in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its exposure to the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on its transactional balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Currency exchange derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2016 associated with foreign currency transaction risks resulted in a net liability of $0.3 million, with a liability in the amount of $1.0 million recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" and an asset in the amount of $0.7 million recorded in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Currency exchange derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2015 associated with foreign exchange transaction risks resulted in a net liability of $0.3 million, with a liability in the amount of $0.7 million recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" and an asset in the amount of $0.4 million recorded in "Prepaid expense and other current assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Derivatives associated with these transaction risks resulted in foreign exchange losses of $15.8 million, $15.3 million and $21.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These mark-to-market adjustments on the derivative contracts, offset by the effect of changes in currency exchange rates on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, resulted in net losses of $13.9 million, $13.8 million and $11.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These net impacts are reported in “Foreign currency transactions and other” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The settlement of derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments resulted in a net cash inflow of $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and net cash outflows of $33.9 million and $8.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and were reported within "Net cash provided by operating activities" in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments — The Company had no foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges of its net investment in a foreign subsidiary outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. A net cash inflow of $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and a net cash outflow of $80.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 were reported within "Net cash used in investing activities" in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Embedded Derivative — In September 2016, the Company invested $25 million in a Ctrip convertible note (see Note 4). The Company determined that the conversion option for this note met the definition of an embedded derivative. At December 31, 2016, the embedded derivative had an estimated fair value of $1.8 million and is reported in the balance sheet with its host contract in "Long-term investments." The embedded derivative is bifurcated for measurement purposes only and the mark-to-market for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1.1 million loss and included in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations.
| |
6. | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE RESERVES |
The Company records a provision for uncollectible agency commissions, principally receivables from accommodations related to agency reservations. The Company also accrues for costs associated with merchant transactions made on its websites by individuals using fraudulent credit cards and for other amounts "charged back" as a result of payment disputes. Changes in accounts receivable reserves consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 15,014 |
| | $ | 14,212 |
| | $ | 14,116 |
|
| Provision charged to expense | 46,241 |
| | 24,324 |
| | 22,990 |
|
| Charge-offs and adjustments | (35,233 | ) | | (22,682 | ) | | (21,546 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | (457 | ) | | (840 | ) | | (1,348 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 25,565 |
| | $ | 15,014 |
| | $ | 14,212 |
|
The Company computes basic net income per share by dividing net income applicable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Common equivalent shares related to stock options, restricted stock units, and performance share units are calculated using the treasury stock method. Performance share units are included in the weighted-average common equivalent shares based on the number of shares that would be issued if the end of the reporting period were the end of the performance period, if the result would be dilutive.
The Company's convertible notes have net share settlement features requiring the Company upon conversion to settle the principal amount of the debt for cash and the conversion premium for cash or shares of the Company's common stock, at the Company's option. The convertible notes are included in the calculation of diluted net income per share if their inclusion is dilutive under the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding used in calculating diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Weighted-average number of basic common shares outstanding | 49,491 |
| | 50,940 |
| | 52,301 |
|
| Weighted-average dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units | 238 |
| | 395 |
| | 340 |
|
| Assumed conversion of Convertible Senior Notes | 334 |
| | 258 |
| | 382 |
|
| Weighted-average number of diluted common and common equivalent shares outstanding | 50,063 |
| | 51,593 |
| | 53,023 |
|
| Anti-dilutive potential common shares | 2,443 |
| | 2,563 |
| | 2,574 |
|
Anti-dilutive potential common shares for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 include approximately 2.0 million shares, 2.1 million shares and 2.1 million shares, respectively, that could be issued under the Company's outstanding convertible notes. Under the treasury stock method, the convertible notes will generally have an anti-dilutive impact on net income per share if the conversion prices for the convertible notes exceed the Company's average stock price.
Property and equipment at December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Estimated
Useful Lives
(years) |
| Computer equipment and software | $ | 522,675 |
| | $ | 396,961 |
| | 2 to 5 years |
| Leasehold improvements | 143,191 |
| | 109,724 |
| | 2 to 11 years |
| Office equipment, furniture and fixtures | 34,176 |
| | 28,447 |
| | 2 to 10 years |
| Building construction-in-progress | 5,945 |
| | — |
| | |
| Total | 705,987 |
| | 535,132 |
| | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (358,970 | ) | | (260,346 | ) | | |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 347,017 |
| | $ | 274,786 |
| | |
Fixed asset depreciation expense was approximately $140.1 million, $101.5 million and $78.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
| |
| 9. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL |
The Company's intangible assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 | | | | |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Amortization Period | | Weighted Average Useful Life |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Supply and distribution agreements | $ | 809,287 |
| | $ | (270,813 | ) | | $ | 538,474 |
| | $ | 824,932 |
| | $ | (227,994 | ) | | $ | 596,938 |
| | 10 - 20 years | | 16 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Technology | 112,141 |
| | (80,549 | ) | | 31,592 |
| | 112,639 |
| | (61,404 | ) | | 51,235 |
| | 1 - 5 years | | 5 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Patents | 1,623 |
| | (1,598 | ) | | 25 |
| | 1,623 |
| | (1,562 | ) | | 61 |
| | 15 years | | 15 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Internet domain names | 39,495 |
| | (25,089 | ) | | 14,406 |
| | 40,352 |
| | (20,954 | ) | | 19,398 |
| | 2 - 20 years | | 8 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade names | 1,667,221 |
| | (261,412 | ) | | 1,405,809 |
| | 1,671,356 |
| | (183,101 | ) | | 1,488,255 |
| | 4-20 years | | 20 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-compete agreements | 21,900 |
| | (18,321 | ) | | 3,579 |
| | 22,847 |
| | (11,201 | ) | | 11,646 |
| | 3-4 years | | 3 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 135 |
| | (135 | ) | | — |
| |
| |
|
| Total intangible assets | $ | 2,651,667 |
| | $ | (657,782 | ) | | $ | 1,993,885 |
| | $ | 2,673,884 |
| | $ | (506,351 | ) | | $ | 2,167,533 |
| | | | |
Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. Amortization expense was approximately $169.1 million, $171.0 million and $129.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The annual estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2017 | $ | 159,451 |
|
| 2018 | 141,161 |
|
| 2019 | 130,997 |
|
| 2020 | 124,216 |
|
| 2021 | 119,469 |
|
| Thereafter | 1,318,591 |
|
| | $ | 1,993,885 |
|
A roll-forward of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 3,375,000 |
| | $ | 3,326,474 |
|
| Acquisitions | — |
| | 74,584 |
|
| Impairment | (940,700 | ) | | — |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | (37,394 | ) | | (26,058 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 2,396,906 |
| | $ | 3,375,000 |
|
A substantial portion of the intangibles and goodwill relates to the acquisitions of OpenTable in July 2014 and KAYAK in May 2013. See Note 18 for further information on the acquisition of OpenTable.
As of September 30, 2016, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment testing. Other than OpenTable, the fair values of the Company’s reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. For OpenTable, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge to goodwill of $940.7 million, which is not tax deductible, resulting in an adjusted carrying value of OpenTable goodwill of $580.1 million as of September 30, 2016. The goodwill impairment charge was included in operating expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. OpenTable’s estimated fair value was determined using a combination of standard valuation techniques, including an income approach (discounted cash flows) and market approaches (EBITDA multiples of comparable publicly-traded companies and precedent transactions). Also, the Company tested the recoverability of OpenTable’s other long-lived assets and concluded there was no impairment as of September 30, 2016. Since the annual impairment test, there have been no further events or changes in circumstances to indicate a potential impairment.
The goodwill impairment was primarily the result of a change in OpenTable’s business strategy that occurred during the third quarter 2016. OpenTable’s post-acquisition strategy was premised on significant and rapid investment in international expansion and various other growth initiatives, resulting in near-term reduced earnings and profit margins but with the goal of achieving significantly increased revenues and profitability in the long term. This strategy had resulted in limited progress as of September 30, 2016. As a result, while OpenTable intends to continue to pursue and invest in international expansion and its other growth initiatives, it intends to do so in a more measured and deliberate manner. This change in strategy resulted in OpenTable updating its forecasted financial results to reflect (a) a material reduction in forecasted long-term financial results from these initiatives, partially offset by (b) improved earnings and profit margins in the near term as a result of the reduced investments. Based on the updated forecast, the Company estimated a significant reduction in the fair value of the OpenTable business and recorded the goodwill impairment discussed above.
Revolving Credit Facility
In June 2015, the Company entered into a $2.0 billion five-year unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of lenders. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear interest, at the Company’s option, at a rate per annum equal to either (i) the adjusted LIBOR for the interest period in effect for such borrowing plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.50%; or (ii) the greatest of (a) Bank of America, N.A.'s prime lending rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (c) an adjusted LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to
0.50%. Undrawn balances available under the revolving credit facility are subject to commitment fees at the applicable rate ranging from 0.085% to 0.20%.
The revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of up to $70.0 million of letters of credit as well as borrowings of up to $50.0 million on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros, British Pounds Sterling and any other foreign currency agreed to by the lenders. The proceeds of loans made under the facility would be used for working capital and general corporate purposes, which could include acquisitions, share repurchases or debt repayments. The Company paid $4.0 million in debt issuance costs related to the revolving credit facility during the year ended December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no borrowings outstanding and approximately $3.8 million and $2.5 million of letters of credit issued under this facility.
Upon entering into this new revolving credit facility, the Company terminated its $1.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility entered into in October 2011 and recognized interest expense of $1.0 million related to the write-off of the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs in 2015.
Outstanding Debt
Outstanding debt as of December 31, 2016 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | Unamortized Debt
Discount and Debt
Issuance Cost | | Carrying Value |
| Short-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2018 | | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | (32,266 | ) | | $ | 967,734 |
|
| Long-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 0.35% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2020 | | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | (90,251 | ) | | $ | 909,749 |
|
| 0.9% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2021 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (104,592 | ) | | 895,408 |
|
| 2.15% (€750 Million) Senior Notes due November 2022 | | 791,063 |
| | (5,336 | ) | | 785,727 |
|
| 2.375% (€1 Billion) Senior Notes due September 2024 | | 1,054,750 |
| | (12,861 | ) | | 1,041,889 |
|
| 3.65% Senior Notes due March 2025 | | 500,000 |
| | (3,727 | ) | | 496,273 |
|
| 3.6% Senior Notes due June 2026 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (7,619 | ) | | 992,381 |
|
| 1.8% (€1 Billion) Senior Notes due March 2027 | | 1,054,750 |
| | (5,655 | ) | | 1,049,095 |
|
| Total long-term debt | | $ | 6,400,563 |
| | $ | (230,041 | ) | | $ | 6,170,522 |
|
Outstanding debt as of December 31, 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2015 | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | Unamortized Debt
Discount and Debt
Issuance Cost | | Carrying Value |
| Long-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2018 | | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | (58,929 | ) | | $ | 941,071 |
|
| 0.35% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2020 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (114,898 | ) | | 885,102 |
|
| 0.9% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2021 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (125,258 | ) | | 874,742 |
|
| 2.15% (€750 Million) Senior Notes due November 2022 | | 815,217 |
| | (6,555 | ) | | 808,662 |
|
| 2.375% (€1 Billion) Senior Notes due September 2024 | | 1,086,957 |
| | (14,688 | ) | | 1,072,269 |
|
| 3.65% Senior Notes due March 2025 | | 500,000 |
| | (4,160 | ) | | 495,840 |
|
| 1.8% (€1 Billion) Senior Notes due March 2027 | | 1,086,957 |
| | (6,200 | ) | | 1,080,757 |
|
| Total long-term debt | | $ | 6,489,131 |
| | $ | (330,688 | ) | | $ | 6,158,443 |
|
Based upon the closing price of the Company's common stock for the prescribed measurement periods during the three months ended December 31, 2016, the contingent conversion threshold on the 2018 Notes (as defined below) was exceeded. Therefore, the 2018 Notes are currently convertible at the option of the holders, and, accordingly, the Company reported the carrying value of the 2018 Notes as a current liability in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016.
Since these notes are convertible at the option of the holders and the principal amount is required to be paid in cash, the Company reclassified the unamortized debt discount for the 2018 Notes in the amount of $28.5 million before tax as of December 31, 2016 from additional paid-in-capital to convertible debt in the mezzanine section in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The contingent conversion threshold on the 2018 Notes was not exceeded at December 31, 2015, therefore, the 2018 Notes were reported as a non-current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The determination of whether or not the 2018 Notes are convertible is performed on a quarterly basis. Consequently, the 2018 Notes may not be convertible in future quarters.
The contingent conversion thresholds on the 2020 Notes (as defined below) and the 2021 Notes (as defined below) were not exceeded at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and therefore these notes were reported as a non-current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fair Value of Debt
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the estimated fair value of the outstanding Senior Notes was approximately $8.4 billion and $7.0 billion, respectively, and was considered a "Level 2" fair value measurement (see Note 5). Fair value was estimated based upon actual trades at the end of the reporting period or the most recent trade available as well as the Company's stock price at the end of the reporting period. A substantial portion of the market value of the Company's debt in excess of the outstanding principal amount relates to the conversion premium on the Convertible Senior Notes.
Convertible Debt
If the note holders exercise their option to convert, the Company delivers cash to repay the principal amount of the notes and delivers shares of common stock or cash, at its option, to satisfy the conversion value in excess of the principal amount. In cases where holders decide to convert prior to the maturity date, the Company charges the proportionate amount of remaining debt issuance costs to interest expense.
Description of Senior Convertible Notes
In August 2014, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due September 15, 2021, with an interest rate of 0.9% (the "2021 Notes"). The Company paid $11.0 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2014, related to this offering. The 2021 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $2,055.50 per share. The 2021 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to September 15, 2021, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2021 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2021 Notes in an aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $375 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of June 15, 2021, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2021 Notes. The 2021 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2021 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
In May 2013, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2020, with an interest rate of 0.35% (the "2020 Notes"). The 2020 Notes were issued with an initial discount of $20.0 million. The Company paid $1.0 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2013, related to this offering. The 2020 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $1,315.10 per share. The 2020 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to June 15, 2020, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2020 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2020 Notes in an aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $397 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of
March 15, 2020, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2020 Notes. The 2020 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2020 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2020 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
In March 2012, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2018, with an interest rate of 1.0% (the "2018 Notes"). The Company paid $20.9 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2012, related to this offering. The 2018 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $944.61 per share. The 2018 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to March 15, 2018, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2018 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2018 Notes in aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $344 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of December 15, 2017, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2018 Notes. The 2018 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2018 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2018 Notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
In March 2010, the Company issued in a private placement $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015, with an interest rate of 1.25% (the "2015 Notes"). The Company paid $13.3 million in debt issuance costs associated with the 2015 Notes for the year ended December 31, 2010. The 2015 Notes were convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $303.06 per share. In March 2015, in connection with the maturity or conversion prior to maturity of the 2015 Notes, the Company paid $37.5 million to satisfy the aggregate principal amount due and paid an additional $110.1 million in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount, which was charged to additional paid-in capital. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company delivered cash of $122.9 million to repay the aggregate principal amount and issued 300,256 shares of its common stock and paid cash of $2.2 million in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount associated with the 2015 Notes that were converted prior to maturity.
Cash-settled convertible debt, such as the Company's Convertible Senior Notes, is separated into debt and equity components at issuance and each component is assigned a value. The value assigned to the debt component is the estimated fair value, as of the issuance date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature. The difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated fair value, representing the value assigned to the equity component, is recorded as a debt discount. Debt discount is amortized using the effective interest rate method over the period from the origination date through the stated maturity date. The Company estimated the straight debt borrowing rates at debt origination to be 3.50% for the 2018 Notes, 3.13% for the 2020 Notes and 3.18% for the 2021 Notes. The yield to maturity was estimated at an at-market coupon priced at par.
Debt discount after tax of $82.5 million ($142.9 million before tax) less financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $1.6 million after tax was recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2021 Notes at December 31, 2014. Debt discount after tax of $92.4 million ($154.3 million before tax) less financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $0.1 million after tax was recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2020 Notes at June 30, 2013. Debt discount after tax of $80.9 million ($135.2 million before tax) less financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $2.8 million after tax was recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2018 Notes at March 31, 2012. Debt discount after tax of $69.1 million ($115.2 million before tax) less financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $1.6 million after tax was recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2015 Notes at March 31, 2010.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized interest expense of $94.5 million, $92.7 million and $75.3 million, respectively, related to convertible notes, comprised of $22.5 million, $22.6 million and $17.1 million, respectively, for the contractual coupon interest, $67.5 million, $65.6 million and $54.4 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt discount and $4.5 million, $4.5 million and $3.8 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, included in the amortization of debt discount mentioned above was $2.8 million, $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively, of original issuance discount amortization related to the 2020 Notes. In addition, the Company incurred interest expense for the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs related to debt conversions of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The remaining period for amortization
of debt discount and debt issuance costs is the period until the stated maturity date for the respective debt. The weighted-average effective interest rates for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 are 3.4%, 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively.
In addition, if the Company's convertible debt is redeemed or converted prior to maturity, a gain or loss on extinguishment is recognized. The gain or loss is the difference between the fair value of the debt component immediately prior to extinguishment and its carrying value. To estimate the fair value of the debt at the conversion date, the Company estimated its straight debt borrowing rate, considering its credit rating and straight debt of comparable corporate issuers. For the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company recognized non-cash losses of $6.3 million ($3.8 million after tax) in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in connection with the conversion of the 2015 Notes.
Other Long-term Debt
In May 2016, the Company issued Senior Notes due June 1, 2026, with an interest rate of 3.6% (the "2026 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. The 2026 Notes were issued with an initial discount of $1.9 million. In addition, the Company paid $6.2 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2016. Interest on the 2026 Notes is payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1, beginning December 1, 2016.
In November 2015, the Company issued Senior Notes due November 25, 2022, with an interest rate of 2.15% (the "2022 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of 750 million Euros. The 2022 Notes were issued with an initial discount of 2.2 million Euros. In addition, the Company paid $3.7 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest on the 2022 Notes is payable annually on November 25. Subject to certain limited exceptions, all payments of interest and principal, including payments made upon any redemption of the 2022 Notes will be made in Euros.
In March 2015, the Company issued Senior Notes due March 15, 2025, with an interest rate of 3.65% (the "2025 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of $500 million. The 2025 Notes were issued with an initial discount of $1.3 million. In addition, the Company paid $3.2 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest on the 2025 Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15.
In March 2015, the Company issued Senior Notes due March 3, 2027, with an interest rate of 1.8% (the "2027 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros. The 2027 Notes were issued with an initial discount of 0.3 million Euros. In addition, the Company paid $6.3 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest on the 2027 Notes is payable annually on March 3. Subject to certain limited exceptions, all payments of interest and principal for the 2027 Notes will be made in Euros.
In September 2014, the Company issued Senior Notes due September 23, 2024, with an interest rate of 2.375% (the "2024 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros. The 2024 Notes were issued with an initial discount of 9.4 million Euros. In addition, the Company paid $6.5 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2014. Interest on the 2024 Notes is payable annually on September 23. Subject to certain limited exceptions, all payments of interest and principal, including payments made upon any redemption of the 2024 Notes, will be made in Euros.
The aggregate principal value of the 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2027 Notes and accrued interest thereon are designated as a hedge of the Company's net investment in certain Euro functional currency subsidiaries. The foreign currency transaction gains or losses on these liabilities are measured based upon changes in spot rates and are recorded in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Euro-denominated net assets of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars at each balance sheet date, with effects of foreign currency changes also reported in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Since the notional amount of the recorded Euro-denominated debt and related interest are not greater than the notional amount of the Company's net investment, the Company does not expect to incur any ineffectiveness on this hedge.
Debt discount is amortized using the effective interest rate method over the period from the origination date through the stated maturity date. The Company estimated the effective interest rates at debt origination to be 3.62% for the 2026 Notes, 2.20% for the 2022 Notes, 3.68% for the 2025 Notes, 1.80% for the 2027 Notes and 2.48% for the 2024 Notes.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized interest expense of $108.0 million and $61.5 million, respectively, related to other long-term debt which was comprised of $104.1 million and $59.0 million, respectively, for the contractual coupon interest, $1.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt discount and $2.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. The remaining
period for amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs is the period until the stated maturity dates for the respective debt.
In March 2016, the Company received a ten-year loan from the State of Connecticut in the amount of $2.5 million with an interest rate of 1% in connection with the construction of office space in Connecticut. As of December 31, 2016, the loan is reported in "Other long-term liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The loan will be forgiven if certain employment and salary conditions are met in 2017 for a portion of the loan and in 2019 for the remaining balance of the loan.
In the first quarter of 2016, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $3.0 billion of the Company's common stock, in addition to amounts previously authorized. In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 635,877 shares of its common stock in the open market for an aggregate cost of $861.5 million, which included stock repurchases in December 2016 of 10,215 shares for an aggregate cost of $15.0 million that were settled in January 2017. As a result, the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016 includes $15.0 million in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" for these unsettled stock repurchases. The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 excludes the impact of these stock repurchases settled in January 2017.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company had a remaining authorization of $2.1 billion to purchase its common stock. In the first quarter of 2017, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $2.0 billion of the Company's common stock, in addition to amounts previously authorized. The Company may make additional repurchases of shares under its stock repurchase program, depending on prevailing market conditions, alternate uses of capital and other factors. Whether and when to initiate and/or complete any purchase of common stock and the amount of common stock purchased will be determined at the Company's discretion.
In the first quarter of 2015, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $3.0 billion of the Company's common stock, in addition to amounts previously authorized. In the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased 2,468,259 shares of its common stock in the open market for an aggregate cost of $3.0 billion related to this authorization and 5,813 shares for an aggregate cost of $7.2 million covered under the remaining authorization as of December 31, 2014 to repurchase common stock.
In 2014, the Company repurchased 114,645 share of its common stock in privately negotiated, off-market transactions and 438,897 shares of its common stock in the open market for aggregate costs of $147.3 million and $500.0 million, respectively. All these shares were covered under the Company's remaining authorizations as of December 31, 2013 to repurchase common stock.
The Board of Directors has given the Company the general authorization to repurchase shares of its common stock to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. In the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company repurchased 127,107, 65,849, and 77,761 shares at an aggregate cost of $167.0 million, $81.9 million and $103.1 million, respectively, to satisfy employee withholding taxes related to stock-based compensation.
As of December 31, 2016, there were 13,190,929 shares of the Company's common stock held in treasury.
| |
| 12. | ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
The table below provides the balances for each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (1) | $ | (311,247 | ) | | $ | (217,263 | ) |
Net unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax (2) | 176,563 |
| | 462,115 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (134,684 | ) | | $ | 244,852 |
|
(1)Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, include net losses from fair value adjustments of $35.0 million after tax ($52.6 million before tax) and $34.8 million after tax ($52.6 million before tax) at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, associated with settled derivatives that previously had been designated as net investment hedges (see Note 5).
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, include foreign currency transaction gains of $182.6 million after tax ($310.4 million before tax) and $126.8 million after tax ($220.5 million before tax) at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, associated with the Company's 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2027 Notes. The 2022 Notes, 2024 Notes and 2027 Notes are Euro-denominated debt and are designated as hedges of certain of the Company's Euro-denominated net assets (see Note 10).
The remaining balance in foreign currency translation adjustments excludes income taxes as a result of the Company's intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its international subsidiaries outside of the United States.
(2)The unrealized gains before tax at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $185.9 million and $456.1 million, respectively, of which unrealized gains of $148.5 million and $481.3 million, respectively, were exempt from tax in the Netherlands and unrealized gains of $37.4 million and unrealized losses of $25.2 million, respectively, were taxable.
International pre-tax income was $3.7 billion, $3.1 billion and $2.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. U.S. pre-tax loss was $983.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and U.S. pre-tax income was $35.4 million and $98.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 627,718 |
| | $ | (14,359 | ) | | $ | 613,359 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 63,613 |
| | (32,405 | ) | | 31,208 |
|
| U.S. State | (1,175 | ) | | (65,141 | ) | | (66,316 | ) |
| Total | $ | 690,156 |
| | $ | (111,905 | ) | | $ | 578,251 |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 526,052 |
| | $ | (17,789 | ) | | $ | 508,263 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 88,237 |
| | (68,696 | ) | | 19,541 |
|
| U.S. State | 24,006 |
| | 25,150 |
| | 49,156 |
|
| Total | $ | 638,295 |
| | $ | (61,335 | ) | | $ | 576,960 |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 496,719 |
| | $ | (10,613 | ) | | $ | 486,106 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 10,316 |
| | 47,847 |
| | 58,163 |
|
| U.S. State | 28,953 |
| | (5,527 | ) | | 23,426 |
|
| Total | $ | 535,988 |
| | $ | 31,707 |
| | $ | 567,695 |
|
The U.S. pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the pre-tax income for the year December 31, 2015 is primarily due to the impairment charge for goodwill of $940.7 million related to OpenTable (see Note 9) and increased interest expense in 2016. Income tax expense on the Company’s U.S. pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes the impact of the non-deductible impairment charge of OpenTable goodwill, U.S. income tax on the Company’s international interest income, which increased during the year, and the tax benefits arising from U.S. state tax law changes resulting in a net decrease to deferred tax liabilities, mostly associated with acquired intangible assets.
The U.S. pre-tax income for the year ended December 31, 2015, decreased compared to the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily due to higher interest expense and increased intangible amortization from the OpenTable acquisition. Income tax expense on the Company's U.S. pre-tax income for the year ended December 31, 2015, includes the impact of increases in state income tax rates on the Company's deferred tax liabilities and U.S. income tax on the Company's international interest income which increased during the year.
Deferred Income Taxes
At December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $727.8 million of available net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs") for U.S. federal income tax purposes, comprised of approximately $22.8 million of NOLs generated from operating losses and approximately $705.0 million of NOLs generated from equity-related transactions, including equity-based compensation and stock warrants. The NOLs mainly expire from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2021 and an additional $207 million expires at December 31, 2033. The Company also had approximately $583.9 million of U.S. state NOLs, the majority of which were generated from equity related transactions and mainly expire between December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2034. In addition, the Company has $133.5 million of non-U.S. NOLs, of which $66.1 million expire between December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2023. Further at December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $34.3 million of U.S. research tax credit carryforwards, subject to annual limitation, that mainly expire between December 31, 2028 and December 31, 2034, and $26.0 million of federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards, that do not expire, that are available to reduce future tax liabilities.
The utilization of these NOLs, allowances and credits is dependent upon the Company's ability to generate sufficient future taxable income and the tax laws in the jurisdictions where the losses were generated. Because of a 2016 change in state tax law, the Company estimates that approximately $230 million of unrecognized state NOLs ($20.7 million tax-effected) generated from equity-related transactions will expire before the Company has the capacity to utilize them. The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduces the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets, including its recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future income, tax planning strategies, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Deferred tax assets/(liabilities): | |
| | |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward — U.S. | $ | 15,977 |
| | $ | 59,220 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward — International | 18,371 |
| | 18,153 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 72,631 |
| | 61,703 |
|
| Stock-based compensation and other stock based payments | 60,937 |
| | 77,761 |
|
| Other | — |
| | 8,001 |
|
| Subtotal | 167,916 |
| | 224,838 |
|
| | | | |
| Discount on convertible notes | (77,845 | ) | | (112,886 | ) |
| Intangible assets and other | (740,329 | ) | | (822,685 | ) |
| Euro denominated debt | (117,737 | ) | | (92,230 | ) |
| Fixed assets | (2,245 | ) | | (3,658 | ) |
| Other | (3,958 | ) | | — |
|
| Less valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | (24,475 | ) | | (64,845 | ) |
Net deferred tax liabilities (1) | $ | (798,673 | ) | | $ | (871,466 | ) |
(1) Includes deferred tax assets of $23.7 million and $21.1 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, reported in "Other assets" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $24.5 million at December 31, 2016 includes $4.1 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards derived from equity transactions, $18.5 million related to international operations and $1.9 million related to U.S. research credits and capital loss carryforwards. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company utilized the majority of its pre-2006 federal equity NOLs resulting in a $40 million decrease in the valuation allowance. Additionally, since January 1, 2006, the Company has generated tax benefits arising from equity transactions that are not included in the deferred tax table above in accordance with current accounting principles. Pursuant to the adoption of an accounting update issued in March 2016, the Company will record a deferred tax asset for approximately $300 million, net of valuation allowances, with a corresponding credit to retained earnings on January 1, 2017, representing the previously unrecognized tax benefit related to equity transactions (see Note 2).
It is the practice and intention of the Company to indefinitely reinvest the unremitted earnings of its international subsidiaries outside of the United States, therefore, at December 31, 2016, no provision has been made for U.S. taxes on approximately $13.0 billion of cumulative unremitted international earnings. The Company estimates that the deferred tax liability it would record if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested internationally is approximately $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2016.
Reconciliation of U.S. Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate to Effective Income Tax Rate
A significant portion of the Company's taxable earnings are generated in the Netherlands. According to Dutch corporate income tax law, income generated from qualifying innovative activities is taxed at a rate of 5% ("Innovation Box Tax") rather than the Dutch statutory rate of 25%. A portion of Booking.com's earnings during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 qualifies for Innovation Box Tax treatment, which had a significant beneficial impact on the Company's effective tax rate for those years.
The effective income tax rate of the Company is different from the amount computed using the expected U.S. statutory federal rate of 35% as a result of the following items (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Income tax expense at federal statutory rate | $ | 949,633 |
| | $ | 1,094,912 |
| | $ | 1,046,307 |
|
| Adjustment due to: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign rate differential | (377,542 | ) | | (316,078 | ) | | (289,692 | ) |
| Innovation Box Tax benefit | (324,633 | ) | | (260,193 | ) | | (233,545 | ) |
| Impairment of goodwill and cost-method investment | 343,484 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | (12,691 | ) | | 58,319 |
| | 44,625 |
|
| Income tax expense | $ | 578,251 |
| | $ | 576,960 |
| | $ | 567,695 |
|
Uncertain Tax Positions
See Note 2 for the Company's accounting policy on uncertain tax positions. The following is a reconciliation of the total beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Unrecognized tax benefit — January 1 | $ | 42,594 |
| | $ | 52,356 |
| | $ | 22,104 |
|
| Gross increases — tax positions in current period | 2,468 |
| | 3,411 |
| | 9,305 |
|
| Gross increases — tax positions in prior periods | 859 |
| | 4,305 |
| | 6,569 |
|
| Increase acquired in business combination | — |
| | — |
| | 17,767 |
|
| Gross decreases — tax positions in prior periods | (217 | ) | | (10,365 | ) | | (2,164 | ) |
| Reduction due to lapse in statute of limitations | (9,077 | ) | | (7,113 | ) | | (346 | ) |
| Reduction due to settlements during the current period | (3,912 | ) | | — |
| | (879 | ) |
| Unrecognized tax benefit — December 31 | $ | 32,715 |
| | $ | 42,594 |
| | $ | 52,356 |
|
The unrecognized tax benefits are included in "Other long-term liabilities" and "Deferred income taxes" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014. The Company does not expect further significant changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.
The Company's Netherlands, U.S. federal, Connecticut, Singapore, and U.K. income tax returns, constituting the returns of the major taxing jurisdictions, are subject to examination by the taxing authorities as prescribed by applicable statute. The statute of limitations remains open for: the Company's Netherlands returns from 2010 and forward; the Company's Singapore returns from 2012 and forward; the Company's U.S. Federal and Connecticut returns from 2013 and forward; and the Company's U.K. returns for the tax years 2008, 2015, and 2016. No income tax waivers have been executed that would extend the period subject to examination beyond the period prescribed by statute in the major taxing jurisdictions in which the company is a taxpayer. See Note 14 for more information regarding tax contingencies.
| |
| 14. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Competition Reviews
The online travel industry has become the subject of investigations by various national competition authorities ("NCAs"), particularly in Europe. The Company is or has been involved in investigations predominately related to whether Booking.com's contractual parity arrangements with accommodation providers, sometimes also referred to as "most favored nation" or "MFN" provisions, are anti-competitive because they require accommodation providers to provide Booking.com with room rates that are at least as low as those offered to other online travel companies ("OTCs") or through the accommodation provider's website.
In Europe, investigations into Booking.com's price parity provisions were initiated in 2013 and 2014 by NCAs in France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Sweden, Ireland and Switzerland. A number of other NCAs have also looked at these issues. On April 21, 2015, the French, Italian and Swedish NCAs, working in close cooperation with the European Commission, announced that they had accepted "commitments" offered by Booking.com to resolve and close the investigations in France,
Italy and Sweden. Under the commitments, Booking.com replaced its existing price parity agreements with accommodation providers with "narrow" price parity agreements. Under a "narrow" price parity agreement, subject to certain exceptions, an accommodation provider is still required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offers to a consumer directly online, but it is no longer required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offers to other OTCs. The commitments also allow an accommodation provider to, among other things, offer different terms and conditions (e.g., free WiFi) and availability to consumers that book with online travel companies that offer lower rates of commission or other benefits, offer lower rates to consumers that book through offline channels and continue to discount through, among other things, accommodation loyalty programs, as long as those rates are not published or marketed online. The commitments apply to accommodations in France, Italy and Sweden and were effective on July 1, 2015. The foregoing description is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the commitments published by the NCAs on April 21, 2015.
On July 1, 2015, Booking.com voluntarily implemented the commitments given to the French, Italian and Swedish NCAs throughout the European Economic Area and Switzerland. Nearly all NCAs in the European Economic Area have now closed their investigations following Booking.com's implementation of the commitments in their jurisdictions. Booking.com has also recently resolved the concerns of the NCAs in Australia, New Zealand and Georgia further to agreeing to implement the "narrow" price parity clause in these countries. The Turkish NCA recently imposed fines on Booking.com following an investigation into Booking.com's "wide" parity clauses. Booking.com is in ongoing discussions with various NCAs in other countries regarding their concerns. The Company is currently unable to predict the long-term impact the implementation of these commitments will have on Booking.com's business, on investigations by other countries, or on industry practice more generally.
On December 23, 2015, the German NCA issued a final decision prohibiting Booking.com's "narrow" price parity agreements with accommodations in Germany. The German NCA did not issue a fine, but has reserved its position regarding an order for disgorgement of profits. Booking.com is appealing the German NCA's decision. An Italian hotel association has appealed the Italian NCA's decision to accept the commitments by Booking.com.
A working group of 10 European NCAs (France, Germany, Belgium, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and Sweden) was established by the European Commission in December 2015 to monitor the effects of the narrow price parity clause in Europe. This working group (the "ECN Working Group") issued questionnaires during 2016 to online travel agencies, including Booking.com and Expedia, meta-search sites and hotels about the narrow price parity clause. On February 17, 2017 the ECN Working Group issued a statement that it would publish its report soon and that it had decided to keep the sector under review and re-assess the competitive situation in due course. Separately, the French NCA, which is conducting its own review of the effects of the narrow price parity clause, on February 9, 2017, issued a report stating that it has not ruled out the possibility of issuing an opinion at its own initiative if a change in competition requires it, and that it would continue to contribute actively to the ECN Working Group process.
The Company is unable to predict how these appeals and the remaining investigations in other countries will ultimately be resolved, or whether further action in Europe will be taken as a result of the working group's findings. Possible outcomes include requiring Booking.com to amend or remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions and/or the imposition of fines. The Company is unable to predict the impact these possible outcomes might have on its business.
In August 2015, French legislation known as the "Macron Law" became effective. Among other things, the Macron Law makes price parity agreements illegal, including the "narrow" price parity agreements agreed to by the French NCA in April 2015. Legislation in Austria prohibiting "narrow" price parity agreements (including the narrow parity clause) became effective on December 31, 2016. Similar legislation was approved by the Italian Senate in June 2016 but not ultimately passed, and could be introduced again in 2017. A motion to prohibit the narrow price parity clause has also been proposed in Switzerland. It is not yet clear how the Macron Law and the Austrian legislation or the proposed Italian and Swiss legislation may affect the Company's business in the long term in France, Austria, Italy and Switzerland, respectively.
Competition-related investigations, legislation or issues could also give rise to private litigation. For example, Booking.com is involved in private litigation in Sweden related to its "narrow" price parity provisions. We are unable to predict how this litigation will be resolved, or whether it will impact Booking.com's business in Sweden.
Litigation Related to Travel Transaction Taxes
The Company and certain third-party OTCs are currently involved in approximately thirty lawsuits, including certified and putative class actions, brought by or against U.S. states, cities and counties over issues involving the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.) related to the priceline.com business. Generally,
the complaints allege, among other things, that the OTCs violated each jurisdiction's respective relevant travel transaction tax ordinance with respect to the charge and remittance of amounts to cover taxes under each law. The Company believes that the laws at issue generally do not apply to the services it provides, namely the facilitation of travel reservations, and, therefore, that it does not owe the taxes that are claimed to be owed. However, the Company has been involved in this type of litigation for many years, and state and local jurisdictions where these issues have not been resolved could assert that the Company is subject to travel transaction taxes and could seek to collect such taxes, retroactively and/or prospectively. From time to time, the Company has found it expedient to settle claims pending in these matters without conceding that the claims at issue are meritorious or that the claimed taxes are in fact due to be paid. The Company may also settle current or future travel transaction tax claims.
On August 5, 2016, the tax appeal court of the State of Hawaii ruled that online travel companies, including the Company, owe General Excise Tax (GET) on the gross amounts collected from consumers on rental car reservations. The tax appeal court rejected the online travel companies’ arguments that GET applies only to amounts retained by online travel companies and does not include amounts paid to rental car company suppliers. The online travel companies argued that GET should not apply to gross amounts charged to consumers for rental car reservations pursuant to the 2015 decision of the Hawaii Supreme Court in Travelocity.com, L.P., et al. v. Director of Taxation that GET applies to amounts retained by online travel companies for hotel reservations and not for gross amounts charged to consumers. The Company intends to appeal the tax appeal court decision to the Hawaii appellate courts. The Company must pay the amount of the judgment, which has not yet been entered and which we believe will be immaterial to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, in order to appeal the decision.
Litigation is subject to uncertainty and there could be adverse developments in these pending or future cases and proceedings. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending litigation may encourage the commencement of additional litigation, audit proceedings or other regulatory inquiries and also could result in substantial liabilities for past and/or future bookings, including, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorneys’ fees and costs. An adverse outcome in one or more of these unresolved proceedings could have an adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or cash flows in any given operating period. However, the Company believes that even if the Company were to suffer adverse determinations in the near term in more of the pending proceedings than currently anticipated, given results to date it would not have a material impact on its liquidity or financial condition.
As a result of the travel transaction tax litigation generally and other attempts by U.S. jurisdictions to levy similar taxes, the Company has established an accrual (including estimated interest and penalties) for the potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes in the amount of approximately $27 million at both December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Company's legal expenses for these matters are expensed as incurred and are not reflected in the amount accrued. The actual cost may be less or greater, potentially significantly, than the liabilities recorded. An estimate for a reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued cannot be reasonably made.
Patent Infringement
On February 9, 2015, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against The Priceline Group Inc. and its subsidiaries KAYAK Software Corporation, OpenTable, Inc. and priceline.com LLC (the "Subject Companies"). In the complaint, IBM alleges that the Subject Companies have infringed and continue to willfully infringe certain IBM patents that IBM claims relate to the presentation of applications and advertising in an interactive service, preserving state information in online transactions and single sign-on processes in a computing environment and seeks unspecified damages (including a request that the amount of compensatory damages be trebled), injunctive relief and costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Subject Companies believe the claims to be without merit and are contesting them. The Subject Companies asked the court to dismiss the case due to lack of patentable subject matter in the asserted patents, and on March 30, 2016 that motion was denied without prejudice to refiling later in the case. Concurrently with the litigation, the Subject Companies filed two Inter Partes Review ("IRP") petitions and four Covered Business Method (“CBM”) petitions for the patents-in-suit with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the "PTAB"). The PTAB denied one of the IPR petitions and granted one of the IPR petitions, and denied the four CBM petitions. Expert discovery has concluded and summary judgment briefing has begun. Trial in the District Court is scheduled for August 2017. The Company does not believe a loss contingency is probable or reasonably estimable and therefore has not recorded a liability for this matter.
French and Italian Tax Matters
French tax authorities recently concluded an audit of Booking.com that started in 2013 of the years 2003 through 2012. They are asserting that Booking.com has a permanent establishment in France and are seeking to recover what they claim are unpaid income taxes and value-added taxes. In December 2015, the French tax authorities issued Booking.com assessments for approximately 356 million Euros, the majority of which would represent penalties and interest. The Company believes that Booking.com has been, and continues to be, in compliance with French tax law, and the Company intends to contest the assessments. If the Company is unable to resolve the matter with the French authorities, it would expect to challenge the assessments in the French courts. In order to contest the assessments in court, the Company may be required to pay, upfront, the full amount or a significant part of any such assessments, though any such payment would not constitute an admission by it that it owes the taxes. At the end of 2016, French authorities announced their intention to also audit the tax years 2013 to 2015, which could result in additional assessments.
Italian tax authorities have initiated a process to determine whether Booking.com should be subject to additional tax obligations in Italy. Italian tax authorities may determine that the Company owes additional taxes, and may also assess penalties and interest. The Company believes that it has been, and continues to be, in compliance with Italian tax law.
Other
The Company accrues for certain legal contingencies where it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Such accrued amounts are not material to the Company's consolidated balance sheets and provisions recorded have not been material to the Company's consolidated results of operations or cash flows. An estimate for a reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued cannot be reasonably made.
From time to time, the Company has been, and expects to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources, divert management's attention from the Company's business objectives and adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Contingent Consideration for Business Acquisitions (see Note 18)
Employment Contracts
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of senior management that provide for cash severance payments of up to approximately $17.8 million, accelerated vesting of equity instruments, including without limitation, stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units upon, among other things, death or termination without "cause" or "good reason," as those terms are defined in the agreements. In addition, certain of the agreements provide for the extension of health and insurance benefits after termination for periods up to two years.
Building Construction
In September 2016, the Company signed a turnkey agreement to construct an office building in the Netherlands, which will be the future headquarters of the Booking.com business. The turnkey agreement provides for payments by Booking.com of approximately 270 million Euros and consists of two components, land use rights and the building to be constructed. Upon signing this agreement, Booking.com paid approximately 48 million Euros to the developer, which included approximately 43 million Euros for the acquired land use rights and approximately 5 million Euros for the building construction. The land use rights are included in “Other assets” and the building construction-in-progress is included in “Property and equipment, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2016, and both are reflected as investing activities in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. The land use rights asset and required future lease payments to the Municipality in Amsterdam of approximately 60 million Euros are recognized as rent expense on a straight-line basis over the remaining 49-year term of the lease and are recorded in general and administrative expense in the statements of operations. In 2017, Booking.com expects to pay approximately 34 million Euros related to the building construction, with the remainder of payments being paid periodically beginning in 2018 until the expected completion of the building in late 2020. The Company utilized its international cash for the September 2016 payment and expects all future payments to be made from its international cash.
Operating Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment through operating leases. Rental expense for leased office space was approximately $77.3 million, $64.8 million and $57.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Rental expense for data center space was approximately $22.2 million, $21.6 million and $14.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The Company's headquarters and the headquarters of the priceline.com business are located in Norwalk, Connecticut, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 90,000 square feet of office space. The Company leases approximately 258,000 square feet of office space in Amsterdam, Netherlands for the headquarters of the Booking.com business; the KAYAK business is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 18,000 square feet of office space; the agoda.com business has significant support operations in Bangkok, Thailand, where the Company leases approximately 140,000 square feet of office space; the OpenTable business is headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 60,000 square feet of office space; and the Rentalcars.com business is headquartered in Manchester, England, where the Company leases approximately 45,000 square feet of office space. The Company leases additional office space to support its operations in various locations around the world, including hosting and data center facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, Hong Kong and China and sales and support facilities in numerous locations.
Other than the office building in the Netherlands that is currently under construction, as discussed above, the Company does not own any real estate as of December 31, 2016. Minimum payments for operating leases for office space, data centers and equipment having initial or remaining non-cancellable terms in excess of one year have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the December 31, 2016 spot exchange rates, as applicable, and are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | After 2021 | | Total |
| $ | 103,656 |
| | $ | 103,561 |
| | $ | 92,958 |
| | $ | 79,340 |
| | $ | 57,418 |
| | $ | 150,738 |
| | $ | 587,671 |
|
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the "Plan") covering certain U.S. employees. In connection with acquisitions, effective as of the date of such acquisitions, the Company assumed defined contribution plans covering the U.S. employees of the acquired companies. The Company also maintains certain other defined contribution plans outside of the United States for which it provides contributions for participating employees. The Company's matching contributions during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were approximately $10.2 million, $8.4 million and $6.2 million, respectively.
| |
| 16. | GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
The Company's international information consists of the results of Booking.com, agoda.com and Rentalcars.com and the results of the international businesses of KAYAK and OpenTable since July 24, 2014 (in each case regardless of where the consumer resides, where the consumer is physically located while using our services or the location of the travel service provider or restaurant). The Company's geographic information is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | International | | Total Company |
| | | The Netherlands | | Other | |
| 2016 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,680,446 |
| | $ | 7,783,376 |
| | $ | 1,279,184 |
| | $ | 10,743,006 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 1,918,095 |
| | 51,317 |
| | 24,473 |
| | 1,993,885 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,801,835 |
| | 228,670 |
| | 366,401 |
| | 2,396,906 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 102,457 |
| | 195,669 |
| | 123,485 |
| | 421,611 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,817,360 |
| | $ | 6,205,116 |
| | $ | 1,201,511 |
| | $ | 9,223,987 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 2,052,351 |
| | 78,027 |
| | 37,155 |
| | 2,167,533 |
|
| Goodwill | 2,742,535 |
| | 232,982 |
| | 399,483 |
| | 3,375,000 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 89,656 |
| | 138,329 |
| | 103,142 |
| | 331,127 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,798,484 |
| | $ | 5,519,207 |
| | $ | 1,124,280 |
| | $ | 8,441,971 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 2,183,957 |
| | 108,650 |
| | 42,154 |
| | 2,334,761 |
|
| Goodwill | 2,712,479 |
| | 224,731 |
| | 389,264 |
| | 3,326,474 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 80,668 |
| | 97,056 |
| | 77,915 |
| | 255,639 |
|
17. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2016 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 2,148,119 |
| | $ | 2,555,902 |
| | $ | 3,690,552 |
| | $ | 2,348,433 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross profit | 2,019,450 |
| | 2,429,818 |
| | 3,589,063 |
| | 2,276,361 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Net income(1) | 374,424 |
| | 580,638 |
| | 506,017 |
| | 673,908 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share(1) | $ | 7.54 |
| | $ | 11.71 |
| | $ | 10.24 |
| | $ | 13.66 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share(1) | $ | 7.47 |
| | $ | 11.60 |
| | $ | 10.13 |
| | $ | 13.47 |
|
(1) tIncludes a non-cash charge in the third quarter of 2016 related to an impairment of OpenTable goodwill of $940.7 million, which is not tax deductible (see Note 9). The goodwill impairment charge reduced basic and diluted net income per share for the third quarter of 2016 by $19.03 and $18.82, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 1,840,694 |
| | $ | 2,280,397 |
| | $ | 3,102,901 |
| | $ | 1,999,995 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross profit | 1,672,236 |
| | 2,092,906 |
| | 2,947,282 |
| | 1,879,383 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 333,327 |
| | 517,032 |
| | 1,196,732 |
| | 504,269 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | $ | 6.42 |
| | $ | 10.02 |
| | $ | 23.67 |
| | $ | 10.14 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 6.36 |
| | $ | 9.94 |
| | $ | 23.41 |
| | $ | 10.00 |
|
18. ACQUISITIONS
Subsequent Event - Acquisition activity in 2017
On February 7, 2017, the Company signed a definitive agreement to acquire the Momondo Group, which operates the travel meta-search websites Momondo and Cheapflights. The Company will use approximately $550 million of its international cash to fund this acquisition. The deal is expected to close later in the year, subject to regulatory approval.
Acquisition activity in 2015
The Company paid approximately $75 million, net of cash acquired, to acquire certain businesses in 2015. The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these businesses starting at their respective acquisition dates.Revenues and earnings of these businesses since their respective acquisition date and pro forma results of operations have not been presented separately as such financial information is not material to the Company's results of operations. As of both December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets include a long-term liability of approximately $9 million for estimated contingent consideration for a business acquisition. The estimated acquisition-date contingent liability is based upon the probability-weighted average payments for specific performance factors from the acquisition date through the performance period which ends at March 31, 2019. The range of undiscounted outcomes for the estimated contingent payments is approximately $0 to $90 million.
Acquisition activity in 2014
OpenTable, Inc.
On July 24, 2014, the Company acquired OpenTable, Inc., a leading online restaurant reservation business, in a cash transaction. The purchase price of OpenTable was approximately $2.5 billion (approximately $2.4 billion net of cash acquired) or $103.00 per share of OpenTable common stock. The Company funded the acquisition from cash on hand in the United States and $995 million borrowed under the Company's previous revolving credit facility, which the Company repaid during the third quarter of 2014. Also, in connection with this acquisition, the Company assumed unvested employee stock options and restricted stock units with an acquisition fair value of approximately $95 million.
OpenTable has built a strong brand helping diners secure restaurant reservations online across the United States and select non-U.S. markets. OpenTable also helps restaurants manage their reservations and connect directly with their customers. The Company believes that OpenTable has significant global potential and intends to leverage its international experience and capabilities in support of OpenTable's international growth. During the third quarter of 2016, the Company changed its business strategy to pursue and invest in OpenTable international expansion and other growth initiatives in a more measured and deliberate manner. This change in strategy resulted in a material reduction in forecasted long-term financial results for OpenTable. As a result, the Company recognized a non-cash impairment charge for OpenTable goodwill of $940.7 million. See Note 9 for further information.
The purchase price allocations were completed as of December 31, 2014. The aggregate purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions): |
| | | | |
Current assets (1) | | $ | 203 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets (2) | | 1,435 |
|
Goodwill (3) | | 1,500 |
|
| Other long-term assets | | 38 |
|
Total liabilities (4) | | (647 | ) |
| Total consideration | | $ | 2,529 |
|
(1) Includes cash acquired of $126 million.
(2) Acquired definite-lived intangibles, with a weighted-average life of 18.8 years, consisted of trade names of $1.1 billion with an estimated useful life of 20 years, supply and distribution agreements of $290 million with an estimated useful life of 15 years, and technology of $15 million with estimated useful life of 5 years.
(3) Goodwill is not tax deductible.
(4) Includes deferred tax liabilities of $543 million.
The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OpenTable starting on July 24, 2014. OpenTable's revenues and earnings since the acquisition date and pro forma results of operations have not been presented separately as such financial information is not material to the Company's results of operations.
Other
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired certain businesses that provide hotel marketing services. The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these businesses starting at their respective acquisition dates. The Company paid approximately $98 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase these businesses. As of December 31, 2014, the Company recognized a liability of $10.7 million for estimated contingent payments related to an acquisition. In 2015, the Company paid $18.4 million to settle this contingent liability. The cash payment related to the acquisition-date estimated fair value of $10.7 million is reported as a financing activity and the remaining cash payment of $7.7 million, which was charged to general and administrative expenses as a fair value adjustment, is included as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The Company incurred $6.9 million of professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2014 related to these consummated acquisitions. These acquisition-related expenses were included in general and administrative expenses.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. Some agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
| |
| • | may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; |
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K and the Company's other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
| |
| Exhibit Number | Description |
2.1(a) | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 8, 2012, by and among KAYAK Software Corporation, the Registrant and Produce Merger Sub, Inc. |
2.2(b) | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 12, 2014, by and among OpenTable, Inc., the Registrant and Rhombus, Inc. |
3.1(c)3.1(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. |
3.2(d)3.2(b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant. |
| 4.1 | Reference is hereby made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
4.2(e)4.2(c) | Specimen Certificate for Registrant's Common Stock. |
4.3(f) | Indenture, dated as of March 10, 2010, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.4(g)4.3(d) | Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2012, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.5(h)4.4(e) | Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2013, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.6(i)4.5(f) | Indenture, dated as of August 20, 2014, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
|
| 4.6(g) | |
4.7(j) | Form of Indenture for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024, 1.800% Senior Notes due 2027, 3.650% Senior Notes due 2025, 2.15% Senior Notes due 2022 and 3.600% Senior Notes due 2026, between the Registrant and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee. |
4.8(k)4.7(h) | Form of 2.375% Senior Note due 2024. |
4.9(l)4.8(i) | Officers' Certificate, dated September 23, 2014, for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024. |
10.1(m)4.9(j) | Form of 1.800% Senior Note due 2027. |
| 4.10(k) | Officers' Certificate, dated March 3, 2015, for the 1.800% Senior Notes due 2027. |
| 4.11(l) | Form of 3.650% Senior Note due 2025. |
| 4.12(m) | Officers' Certificate, dated March 13, 2015, for the 3.650% Senior Notes due 2025. |
| 4.13(g) | Form of 2.15% Senior Note due 2022. |
| 4.14(g) | Officers' Certificate, dated November 25, 2015, for the 2.15% Senior Notes due 2022. |
| 4.15(n) | Form of 3.600% Senior Note due 2026. |
| 4.16(n) | Officers' Certificate, dated May 23, 2016, for the 3.600% Senior Notes due 2026. |
| 10.1(o)+ | The Priceline Group Inc.priceline.com Incorporated 1999 Omnibus Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 6, 2013). |
10.2(n)+ | Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.3(o)10.2(p)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees in the Netherlands under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.4(p)10.3(q)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for awards under the 1999 Omnibus Plan to non-employee directors. |
10.5(q)+ | 2012 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.6(r)+ | 2013 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.7(s)10.4(r)+ | 2014 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.8+10.5(s)+ | 2015 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
| 10.6(t)+ | 2016 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
|
| |
| 10.7(u)+ | Amended and Restated KAYAK Software Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. |
10.9(t)10.8(v)+ | OpenTable, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan. |
10.10(u)10.9(w)+ | Buuteeq, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Plan. |
10.11(v)10.10(x)+ | Amended and Restated Rocket Travel, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan. |
| 10.11(x)+ | The Priceline Group Inc. Amended and Restated Annual Bonus Plan, adopted on February 20, 2007.Plan. |
10.12(r)10.12(y)+ | Form of Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. |
10.13(w)10.13(z)+ | Transition Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
10.14(w)10.14(t)+ | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 7, 2013March 5, 2015 by and between the Registrant, Booking.com Holding B.V. and Darren R. Huston. |
10.15(w)10.15(z)+ | Amended and Restated Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
10.16(x)10.16(aa)+ | Indemnification Agreement, dated September 12, 2011 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
10.17(y)10.17(bb)+ | Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
10.18(z)10.18(cc)+ | Letter amendment, dated December 16, 2008, to letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
10.19(z)10.19(dd)+ | Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 18, 2008,April 21, 2015 by and between the Registrant and Peter J. Millones. |
10.20(z)10.20(ee)+ | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement,contract, dated December 18, 2008,May 19, 2016 by and between Booking.com Holding B.V. and Gillian Tans. |
| 10.21(ff)+ | Separation Letter, dated April 27, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Chris Soder.Darren R. Huston. |
10.21(x)10.22(ee)+ | Employment Letter Agreement, dated May 19, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
| 10.23(gg)+ | Employment Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.24(gg)+ | Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.25(gg)+ | Employee Confidentiality and Assignment Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Glenn D. Fogel. |
| 10.26(gg)+ | Letter Agreement, dated December 15, 2016 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
| 10.27(hh) | Credit Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2011,June 19, 2015, among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time party thereto, RBS Citizens, N.A., as Documentation Agent,and Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co‑Syndication Agents and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. |
10.22(h) | Purchase Agreement, dated May 29, 2013, between the Registrant and Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
10.23(i) | Purchase Agreement, dated August 14, 2014, between The Priceline Group Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as the Initial Purchasers. |
10.24(k) | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 16, 2014, among the Registrant, Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Limited and Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
| 12.1 | Statement of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| 21 | List of Subsidiaries. |
| 23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
| 24.1 | Power of Attorney (included in the Signature Page). |
| 31.1 | Certification of Darren R. Huston,Glenn D. Fogel, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1(aa)32.1(ii) | Certification of Darren R. Huston,Glenn D. Fogel, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
32.2(aa)32.2(ii) | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
| 101 | The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 20142016 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
____________________________
| |
+ | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
| |
| |
(a) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 9, 2012 (File No. 0-25581). |
(b) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(c) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2014 (file No. 0-25581). |
(d) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(e) | Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-69657) filed on March 18, 1999. |
(f) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2010 (File No. 0-25581). |
(g) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2012 (File No. 0-25581). |
(h) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(i) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(j) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the post-effective amendment filed on September 8, 2014 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 2, 2014 (File No. 333-198515). |
(k) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(l) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(m) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on June 6, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(n) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-122414) filed on January 31, 2005. |
(o) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 8, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
(p) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
(q) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2012 (File No. 0-25581). |
(r) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(s) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(t) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(u) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 13, 2014 (File No. 333-196756). |
(v) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on February 23, 2007 (File No. 0-25581). |
(w) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(x) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
(y) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
(z) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-25581). |
(aa) | This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33‑8212 and 34‑47551. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| THE PRICELINE GROUP INC. |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ Darren R. Huston |
| | Name: | Darren R. Huston |
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | Date: | February 19, 2015 |
Power of Attorney
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Darren R. Huston, Daniel J. Finnegan and Peter J. Millones, and each of them severally, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power of substitution and resubstitution to sign in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any and all instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any and all amendments hereto, as fully and for all intents and purposes as he or she might do or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, and his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Jeffery H. Boyd | | Director, Chairman of the Board | | February 19, 2015 |
Jeffery H. Boyd | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Darren R. Huston | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | February 19, 2015 |
Darren R. Huston | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Daniel J. Finnegan | | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting | | February 19, 2015 |
Daniel J. Finnegan | | Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Timothy M. Armstrong | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Timothy M. Armstrong | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Howard W. Barker, Jr. | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Howard W. Barker, Jr. | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Jan L. Docter | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Jan L. Docter | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Jeffrey E. Epstein | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Jeffrey E. Epstein | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ James M. Guyette | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
James M. Guyette | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Nancy B. Peretsman | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Nancy B. Peretsman | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Thomas E. Rothman | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Thomas E. Rothman | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Craig W. Rydin | | Director | | February 19, 2015 |
Craig W. Rydin | | | | |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
| |
| Page No. |
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
| |
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 | |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 | |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 | |
| |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 | |
| |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
The Priceline Group Inc.
Norwalk, Connecticut
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Priceline Group Inc. (formerly known as priceline.com Incorporated) and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Priceline Group Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 18, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
February 18, 2015
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
| Current assets: | | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 3,148,651 |
| | $ | 1,289,994 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 843 |
| | 10,476 |
|
| Short-term investments | | 1,142,182 |
| | 5,462,720 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,212 and $14,116, respectively | | 643,894 |
| | 535,962 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 178,050 |
| | 107,102 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 153,754 |
| | 74,687 |
|
| Total current assets | | 5,267,374 |
| | 7,480,941 |
|
| Property and equipment, net | | 198,953 |
| | 135,053 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | | 2,334,761 |
| | 1,019,985 |
|
| Goodwill | | 3,326,474 |
| | 1,767,912 |
|
| Long-term investments | | 3,755,653 |
| | — |
|
| Other assets | | 57,348 |
| | 40,569 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 14,940,563 |
| | $ | 10,444,460 |
|
| | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
| Current liabilities: | | |
| | |
|
| Accounts payable | | $ | 281,480 |
| | $ | 247,345 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | 600,758 |
| | 545,342 |
|
| Deferred merchant bookings | | 460,558 |
| | 437,127 |
|
| Convertible debt | | 37,195 |
| | 151,931 |
|
| Total current liabilities | | 1,379,991 |
| | 1,381,745 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 1,040,260 |
| | 326,425 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | | 103,533 |
| | 75,981 |
|
| Long-term debt | | 3,849,756 |
| | 1,742,047 |
|
| Total liabilities | | 6,373,540 |
| | 3,526,198 |
|
| | | |
| | |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 16) | |
|
| |
|
|
| Convertible debt | | 329 |
| | 8,533 |
|
| | | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | |
| | |
|
| Common stock, $0.008 par value, authorized 1,000,000,000 shares, 61,821,097 and 61,265,160 shares issued, respectively | | 480 |
| | 476 |
|
| Treasury stock, 9,888,024 and 9,256,721, respectively | | (2,737,585 | ) | | (1,987,207 | ) |
| Additional paid-in capital | | 4,923,196 |
| | 4,592,979 |
|
| Accumulated earnings | | 6,640,505 |
| | 4,218,752 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | (259,902 | ) | | 84,729 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity | | 8,566,694 |
| | 6,909,729 |
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | | $ | 14,940,563 |
| | $ | 10,444,460 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Agency revenues | $ | 5,845,802 |
| | $ | 4,410,689 |
| | $ | 3,142,815 |
|
| Merchant revenues | 2,186,054 |
| | 2,211,474 |
| | 2,104,752 |
|
| Advertising and other revenues | 410,115 |
| | 171,143 |
| | 13,389 |
|
| Total revenues | 8,441,971 |
| | 6,793,306 |
| | 5,260,956 |
|
| Cost of revenues | 857,841 |
| | 1,077,420 |
| | 1,177,275 |
|
| Gross profit | 7,584,130 |
| | 5,715,886 |
| | 4,083,681 |
|
| Operating expenses: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Advertising — Online | 2,360,221 |
| | 1,798,645 |
| | 1,273,637 |
|
| Advertising — Offline | 231,309 |
| | 127,459 |
| | 35,492 |
|
| Sales and marketing | 310,910 |
| | 235,817 |
| | 195,934 |
|
| Personnel, including stock-based compensation of $186,425, $140,526 and $71,565, respectively | 950,191 |
| | 698,692 |
| | 466,828 |
|
| General and administrative | 352,869 |
| | 252,994 |
| | 173,171 |
|
| Information technology | 97,498 |
| | 71,890 |
| | 43,685 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 207,820 |
| | 117,975 |
| | 65,141 |
|
| Total operating expenses | 4,510,818 |
| | 3,303,472 |
| | 2,253,888 |
|
| Operating income | 3,073,312 |
| | 2,412,414 |
| | 1,829,793 |
|
| Other income (expense): | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest income | 13,933 |
| | 4,167 |
| | 3,860 |
|
| Interest expense | (88,353 | ) | | (83,289 | ) | | (62,064 | ) |
| Foreign currency transactions and other | (9,444 | ) | | (36,755 | ) | | (9,720 | ) |
| Total other income (expense) | (83,864 | ) | | (115,877 | ) | | (67,924 | ) |
| Earnings before income taxes | 2,989,448 |
| | 2,296,537 |
| | 1,761,869 |
|
| Income tax expense | 567,695 |
| | 403,739 |
| | 337,832 |
|
| Net income | 2,421,753 |
| | 1,892,798 |
| | 1,424,037 |
|
| Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — |
| | 135 |
| | 4,471 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | $ | 2,421,753 |
| | $ | 1,892,663 |
| | $ | 1,419,566 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | $ | 46.30 |
| | $ | 37.17 |
| | $ | 28.48 |
|
| Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding | 52,301 |
| | 50,924 |
| | 49,840 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 45.67 |
| | $ | 36.11 |
| | $ | 27.66 |
|
| Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding | 53,023 |
| | 52,413 |
| | 51,326 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Net income | | $ | 2,421,753 |
| | $ | 1,892,798 |
| | $ | 1,424,037 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments(1) | | (187,356 | ) | | 97,970 |
| | 69,683 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities(2) | | (157,275 | ) | | 21 |
| | (620 | ) |
| Comprehensive income | | 2,077,122 |
| | 1,990,789 |
| | 1,493,100 |
|
| Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests | | — |
| | (10,279 | ) | | 9,628 |
|
| Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders | | $ | 2,077,122 |
| | $ | 2,001,068 |
| | $ | 1,483,472 |
|
(1) Foreign currency translation adjustments includes a tax of $55,597 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and tax benefits of $55,001 and $18,001 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, associated with hedges of foreign denominated net assets (See Note 14). The remaining balance in currency translation adjustments excludes income taxes due to the Company's practice and intention to reinvest the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in those operations (See Note 15).
(2) Net of tax benefits of $7,621, $43 and $158 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Accumulated Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2011 | 57,579 |
| | $ | 446 |
| | (7,780 | ) | | $ | (803,586 | ) | | $ | 2,431,279 |
| | $ | 1,033,738 |
| | $ | (87,582 | ) | | $ | 2,574,295 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,419,566 |
| | — |
| | 1,419,566 |
|
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax benefit of $158 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (620 | ) | | (620 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit of $18,001 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 64,526 |
| | 64,526 |
|
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests fair value adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (84,693 | ) | | — |
| | (84,693 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt in mezzanine | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22,705 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22,705 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 477 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,679 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,683 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (405 | ) | | (257,021 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (257,021 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72,035 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72,035 |
|
| Issuance of senior convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 78,310 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 78,310 |
|
| Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,189 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,189 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2012 | 58,056 |
| | $ | 450 |
| | (8,185 | ) | | $ | (1,060,607 | ) | | $ | 2,612,197 |
| | $ | 2,368,611 |
| | $ | (23,676 | ) | | $ | 3,896,975 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,892,663 |
| | — |
| | 1,892,663 |
|
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax benefit of $43 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| | 21 |
|
| Currency translation adjustments, net of tax benefit of $55,001 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 108,384 |
| | 108,384 |
|
| Redeemable noncontrolling interests fair value adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (42,522 | ) | | — |
| | (42,522 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt in mezzanine | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,122 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46,122 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 715 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 91,601 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 91,607 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (1,030 | ) | | (883,515 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (883,515 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 142,098 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 142,098 |
|
| Issuance of senior convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 93,402 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 93,402 |
|
| Common stock issued in an acquisition | 1,522 |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,281,122 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,281,134 |
|
| Vested stock options assumed in an acquisition | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 264,423 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 264,423 |
|
| Conversion of debt | 972 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,224 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,232 |
|
| Settlement of conversion spread hedges | — |
| | — |
| | (42 | ) | | (43,085 | ) | | 43,104 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
|
| Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,686 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,686 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2013 | 61,265 |
| | $ | 476 |
| | (9,257 | ) | | $ | (1,987,207 | ) | | $ | 4,592,979 |
| | $ | 4,218,752 |
| | $ | 84,729 |
| | $ | 6,909,729 |
|
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,421,753 |
| | — |
| | 2,421,753 |
|
| Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax benefit of $7,621 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (157,275 | ) | | (157,275 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $55,597 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (187,356 | ) | | (187,356 | ) |
| Reclassification adjustment for convertible debt in mezzanine | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,204 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,204 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units | 256 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,389 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,391 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | (631 | ) | | (750,378 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (750,378 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation and other stock-based payments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 189,292 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 189,292 |
|
| Conversion of debt | 300 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1,658 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,656 | ) |
| Issuance of senior convertible notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,873 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 80,873 |
|
| Stock options and restricted stock units assumed in acquisitions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,751 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,751 |
|
| Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,366 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23,366 |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | 61,821 |
| | $ | 480 |
| | (9,888 | ) | | $ | (2,737,585 | ) | | $ | 4,923,196 |
| | $ | 6,640,505 |
| | $ | (259,902 | ) | | $ | 8,566,694 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | $ | 2,421,753 |
| | $ | 1,892,798 |
| | $ | 1,424,037 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Depreciation | 78,241 |
| | 48,365 |
| | 32,818 |
|
| Amortization | 129,579 |
| | 69,610 |
| | 32,323 |
|
| Provision for uncollectible accounts, net | 22,990 |
| | 16,451 |
| | 16,094 |
|
| Deferred income tax expense (benefit) | 31,707 |
| | (11,104 | ) | | 19,596 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense and other stock based payments | 189,292 |
| | 142,098 |
| | 72,035 |
|
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 5,229 |
| | 7,898 |
| | 5,212 |
|
| Amortization of debt discount | 54,731 |
| | 55,718 |
| | 39,820 |
|
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 6,270 |
| | 26,661 |
| | — |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Accounts receivable | (182,209 | ) | | (111,572 | ) | | (105,277 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (48,932 | ) | | (6,909 | ) | | (40,793 | ) |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 203,870 |
| | 182,163 |
| | 256,021 |
|
| Other | 1,876 |
| | (10,741 | ) | | 33,864 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,914,397 |
| | 2,301,436 |
| | 1,785,750 |
|
| | | | | | |
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Purchase of investments | (10,552,214 | ) | | (9,955,800 | ) | | (6,352,495 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of investments | 10,902,500 |
| | 8,291,283 |
| | 4,799,412 |
|
| Additions to property and equipment | (131,504 | ) | | (84,445 | ) | | (55,158 | ) |
| Acquisitions and other equity investments, net of cash acquired | (2,496,366 | ) | | (331,918 | ) | | (33,861 | ) |
| Proceeds from foreign currency contracts | 14,354 |
| | 3,266 |
| | 86,159 |
|
| Payments on foreign currency contracts | (94,661 | ) | | (81,870 | ) | | (4,014 | ) |
| Change in restricted cash | 9,347 |
| | (2,783 | ) | | (2,756 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (2,348,544 | ) | | (2,162,267 | ) | | (1,562,713 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Proceeds from revolving credit facility | 995,000 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payments related to revolving credit facility | (995,000 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt | 2,282,217 |
| | 980,000 |
| | 1,000,000 |
|
| Payment of debt issuance costs | (17,464 | ) | | (1,018 | ) | | (20,916 | ) |
| Payments related to conversion of senior notes | (125,136 | ) | | (414,569 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Repurchase of common stock | (750,378 | ) | | (883,515 | ) | | (257,021 | ) |
| Payments to purchase subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests | — |
| | (192,530 | ) | | (61,079 | ) |
| Payments of stock issuance costs | — |
| | (1,191 | ) | | — |
|
| Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 16,389 |
| | 91,607 |
| | 2,683 |
|
| Proceeds from the termination of conversion spread hedges | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
|
| Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | 23,366 |
| | 17,686 |
| | 5,189 |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,428,994 |
| | (403,511 | ) | | 668,855 |
|
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (136,190 | ) | | 17,987 |
| | 11,621 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,858,657 |
| | (246,355 | ) | | 903,513 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 1,289,994 |
| | 1,536,349 |
| | 632,836 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 3,148,651 |
| | $ | 1,289,994 |
| | $ | 1,536,349 |
|
| | | | | | |
| SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | 491,530 |
| | $ | 391,169 |
| | $ | 300,539 |
|
| Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 16,950 |
| | $ | 20,954 |
| | $ | 13,933 |
|
| Non-cash fair value increase for redeemable noncontrolling interests | $ | — |
| | $ | 42,522 |
| | $ | 84,693 |
|
| Non-cash investing activity for contingent consideration | $ | 10,700 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Non-cash financing activity for acquisitions | $ | 13,751 |
| | $ | 1,546,748 |
| | $ | — |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Priceline Group Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On April 1, 2014, the Company changed its name from priceline.com Incorporated to The Priceline Group Inc. The Priceline Group Inc. ("The Priceline Group" or the "Company") is a leading provider of online travel and travel related reservation and search services. Through the Company's online travel agent ("OTA") services, the Company connects consumers wishing to make travel reservations with providers of travel services around the world. The Company offers consumers accommodation reservations (including hotels, bed and breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties) through its Booking.com, priceline.com and agoda.com brands. The Company's priceline.com brand also offers consumers reservations for rental cars, airline tickets, vacation packages and cruises. The Company offers rental car reservations worldwide through rentalcars.com. The Company also allows consumers to easily compare airline ticket, hotel reservation and rental car reservation information from hundreds of travel websites at once through KAYAK. The Company acquired OpenTable, a leading provider of online restaurant reservations in July 2014.
| |
2.
| SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation — The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including KAYAK Software Corporation ("KAYAK") since its acquisition in May 2013 and OpenTable, Inc. ("OpenTable") since its acquisition in July 2014. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes thereto. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. The estimates underlying the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements relate to, among other things, the accrual for travel transaction taxes, stock-based compensation, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of goodwill, long-lived assets and intangibles, income taxes, the accrual for loyalty programs and the valuation of redeemable noncontrolling interests.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company's financial instruments, including cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred merchant bookings, are carried at cost which approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments. See Notes 4, 5, 11 and 13 for information on fair value for investments, derivatives, the Company's outstanding Senior Notes and redeemable noncontrolling interests.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents consists primarily of cash and highly liquid investment grade securities with an original maturity of three months or less.
Restricted Cash — Restricted cash at December 31, 2014 and 2013 collateralizes office leases and supplier obligations.
Investments — The Company has classified its investments as available-for-sale securities. These securities are carried at estimated fair value with the aggregate unrealized gains and losses related to these investments, net of taxes, reflected as a part of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" within stockholders' equity.
The fair value of the investments is based on the specific quoted market price of the securities or comparable securities at the balance sheet dates. Investments in debt securities are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary because the Company either intends to sell or it is more-likely-than not that it will have to sell the impaired security before recovery. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. If the Company does not intend to sell the debt security, but it is probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due, then only the impairment due to the credit risk would be recognized in earnings and the remaining amount of the impairment would be recognized in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" within stockholders' equity. Marketable securities are presented as current assets on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets if they are available to meet the short-term working capital needs of the Company. See Notes 4 and 5 for further detail of investments.
Property and Equipment — Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, when applicable, the life of the lease, whichever is shorter.
Website and Software Capitalization — Certain direct development costs associated with website and internal-use software are capitalized and include external direct costs of services and payroll costs for employees devoting time to the software projects principally related to website and mobile app development, including support systems, software coding, designing system interfaces and installation and testing of the software. These costs are recorded as property and equipment and are generally amortized over a period of two to five years beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use. Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional features or functionality are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the enhancements. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as maintenance and training costs, are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill — The Company accounts for acquired businesses using the purchase method of accounting which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements reflect an acquired business starting at the date of the acquisition.
Goodwill is not subject to amortization and is reviewed at least annually for impairment, or earlier if an event occurs or circumstances change and there is an indication of impairment. The Company tests goodwill at a reporting unit level. The fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value, including goodwill. Fair values are determined based on discounted cash flows, market multiples or appraised values and are based on market participant assumptions. An impairment is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill. See Note 9 for further information.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets — The Company reviews long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based upon the Company's ability to recover the carrying value of the assets from the estimated undiscounted future net cash flows, before interest and taxes, of the related operations. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over the present value of estimated future cash flows, using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved and based on assumptions representative of market participants.
Agency Revenues
Agency revenues are derived from travel-related transactions where the Company is not the merchant of record and where the prices of the services sold are determined by third parties. Agency revenues include travel commissions, global distribution system ("GDS") reservation booking fees and customer processing fees, and are reported at the net amounts received, without any associated cost of revenue. Such revenues are generally recognized by the Company when the customers complete their travel.
Merchant Revenues and Cost of Merchant Revenues
Merchant revenues and related cost of revenues are derived from services where the Company is the merchant of record and therefore charges the customer's credit card and subsequently pays the travel service provider for the services provided.
Opaque Services: The Company describes its priceline.com Name Your Own Price® and Express Deals® travel services as "opaque" because certain elements of the service, including the identity of the travel service provider, are not disclosed to the consumer prior to making a reservation. The Name Your Own Price® service connects consumers that are willing to accept a level of flexibility regarding their travel itinerary with travel service providers that are willing to accept a lower price in order to sell their excess capacity without disrupting their existing distribution channels or retail pricing structures. The Company's Name Your Own Price® services use a unique pricing system that allows consumers to "bid" the price they are prepared to pay when submitting an offer for a particular leisure travel service. The Company accesses databases in which participating travel service providers file secure discounted rates, not generally available to the public, to determine whether it can fulfill the consumer's offer. The Company selects the travel service provider and determines the price it will accept from the consumer. Merchant revenues and cost of revenues include the selling price and cost, respectively, of the Name Your Own Price® travel services and are reported on a gross basis.
In 2012, the Company launched Express Deals® as a merchant semi-opaque hotel reservation service at priceline.com. The Company has since expanded the Express Deals®service to include rental car and air reservation services. Express Deals® allows consumers to select hotel, car and air reservations with price and certain information regarding amenities disclosed prior to making the reservation. The identity of the travel service provider is not known prior to committing to the non-refundable reservation. The Company records the difference between the reservation price to the consumer and the travel service provider cost to the Company of its merchant Express Deals® reservation services on a net basis in merchant revenue.
The Company recognizes revenues and costs for these services when it confirms the customer's non-refundable offer. In very limited circumstances, the Company makes certain customer concessions to satisfy disputes and complaints. The Company accrues for such estimated losses and classifies the resulting expense as adjustments to merchant revenue and cost of merchant revenues.
Merchant Retail Services: Merchant revenues for the Company's merchant retail services are derived from transactions where consumers book accommodation reservations or rental car reservations from travel service providers at disclosed rates which are subject to contractual arrangements. Charges are billed to consumers by the Company at the time of booking and are included in deferred merchant bookings until the consumer completes the accommodation stay or returns the rental car. Such amounts are generally refundable upon cancellation, subject to cancellation penalties in certain cases. Merchant revenues and accounts payable to the travel service provider are recognized at the conclusion of the consumer's stay at the accommodation or return of the rental car. The Company records the difference between the reservation price to the consumer and the travel service provider cost to the Company of its merchant retail reservation services on a net basis in merchant revenue.
Pursuant to the terms of the Company's opaque and retail merchant services, its travel service providers are permitted to bill the Company for the underlying cost of the service during a specified period of time. In the event that the Company is not billed by the travel provider within the specified time period, the Company reduces its cost of revenues by the unbilled amounts.
Advertising and Other Revenues
Advertising and other revenues are primarily earned by KAYAK and OpenTable. KAYAK earns advertising revenue primarily by sending referrals to travel service providers and OTAs and from advertising placements on its websites and mobile applications. Generally, revenue related to referrals is earned based upon the completion of travel by a consumer or when a consumer clicks on a referral placement and revenue for advertising placements is earned based upon when a customer clicks on an advertisement or when the Company displays an advertisement. OpenTable earns revenue primarily by facilitating reservations and providing computerized host-stand operations to restaurants through proprietary restaurant management reservation services. The Company recognizes other revenues related to OpenTable for reservation revenues when diners are seated and for subscription revenues on a straight-line basis during the contractual period over which the service is delivered. Revenues are recorded net of redeemable dining points issued to diners during each period presented.
Loyalty Programs
The Company provides various loyalty programs. Participating customers earn loyalty points on current transactions that can be redeemed for future qualifying transactions. When the points are earned, the Company estimates the amount of loyalty points expected to be redeemed and records a reduction in revenue. As of December 31, 2014, a liability of $71.1 million for loyalty points programs is included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Tax Recovery Charge, Occupancy Taxes and State and Local Taxes
The Company provides an online travel service to facilitate online travel purchases by consumers from travel service providers, including accommodation, rental car and airline ticket reservations, and sometimes as part of a vacation package reservation. For merchant model transactions, the Company charges the consumer an amount intended to cover the taxes that the Company anticipates the travel service provider will owe and remit to the local taxing authorities ("tax recovery charge"). Tax rate information for calculating the tax recovery charge is provided to the Company by the travel service providers.
In certain taxing jurisdictions, the Company is required by passage of a new statute or by court order to collect and remit certain taxes (local occupancy tax, general excise and/or sales tax) imposed upon its margin and/or service fee, or in the case of Hawaii, on the full amount collected from the consumer. In those jurisdictions, the Company is collecting and remitting tax as required. The tax recovery charge and occupancy and other related taxes collected from customers and remitted to those jurisdictions are reported on a net basis on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Except in those jurisdictions, the Company does not charge the customer or remit occupancy or other related taxes based on its margin or service fee, because the Company believes that such taxes are not owed on its compensation for its services (see Note 16).
Advertising - Online — Online advertising expenses consist primarily of the costs of (1) search engine keyword purchases; (2) referrals from meta-search and travel research websites; (3) affiliate programs; and (4) banner, pop-up and other Internet and mobile advertisements. Online advertising expense is generally recognized as incurred. Included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are accrued online advertising liabilities of $164.0 million and $130.3 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Advertising - Offline — Offline advertising expenses are primarily related to the Company's Booking.com, KAYAK and priceline.com businesses and primarily consist of television advertising. The Company expenses advertising production costs the first time the advertising is broadcast.
Sales and Marketing — Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of (1) credit card processing fees associated with merchant transactions; (2) fees paid to third parties that provide call center, website content translations and other services; (3) provisions for credit card chargebacks; and (4) provisions for bad debt, primarily related to agency accommodation commission receivables.
Personnel — Personnel expenses consist of compensation to the Company's personnel, including salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation, payroll taxes and employee health benefits. Included in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are accrued compensation liabilities of $159.0 million and $142.7 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation — The cost of stock-based compensatory transactions is recognized in the financial statements based upon fair value. The fair value of performance share units and restricted stock units is determined based on the number of units or shares, as applicable, granted and the quoted price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date or acquisition date. Stock-based compensation related to performance share units reflects the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period. The fair value of employee stock options assumed in acquisitions was determined using the Black Scholes model and the market value of the Company's common stock at the respective acquisition dates. Fair value is recognized as expense on a straight line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the employee requisite service period.
The benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation costs are reported as a credit to additional paid-in capital and as financing cash flows, but only when such excess tax benefits are realized by a reduction to current taxes payable. See Note 3 for further information on stock-based awards.
Information Technology — Information technology expenses consist primarily of: (1) software license and system maintenance fees; (2) data communications and other expenses associated with operating our services; (3) outsourced data center costs; and (4) payments to outside consultants.
Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. The Company records the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred taxes are classified as current or noncurrent based on the balance sheet classification of the related assets and liabilities.
The Company records deferred tax assets to the extent it believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability considering historical profitability, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, and tax planning strategies. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the period in which related temporary differences become deductible. In determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, significant judgments, estimates, and interpretation of statutes are required.
Deferred taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of such change.
Income taxes are not accrued for unremitted earnings of international operations that have been or are intended to be reinvested indefinitely.
The Company recognizes liabilities when it believes that uncertain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by the tax authorities. Liabilities recognized for uncertain tax positions are based on a two step approach for recognition and measurement. First, the Company evaluates the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit based on its technical merits. Secondly, the Company measures the tax benefit as the largest amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Interest and penalties attributable to uncertain tax positions, if any, are recognized as a component of income tax expense. See Note 15 for further details on income taxes.
Segment Reporting — The Company determined that its brands constitute its operating segments. Based on similar economics characteristics and other similar operating factors, the Company has aggregated the operating segments into one reportable segment. The Company manages its business as one unit. For geographic related information, see Note 18.
Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is generally their respective local currency. Assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of exchange existing at the balance sheet date. Income statement amounts are translated at average monthly exchange rates applicable for the period. Translation gains and losses are included as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In September 2014, the Company issued Senior Notes due September 23, 2024 for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros and designated the carrying value, plus accrued interest, as a hedge of the Company's net investment in a Euro functional currency subsidiary. The foreign currency transaction gains or losses on these liabilities and the Euro denominated net assets of the subsidiary are translated into U.S. Dollars and are included as a component of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Notes 11 and 14).
Derivative Financial Instruments — As a result of the Company's international operations, it is exposed to various market risks that may affect its consolidated results of operations, cash flow and financial position. These market risks include, but are not limited to, fluctuations in currency exchange rates. The Company's primary foreign currency exposures are in Euros and British Pound Sterling, in which it conducts a significant portion of its business activities. As a result, the Company faces exposure to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the financial results of its international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation. Additionally, foreign exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency result in gains and losses that are reflected in income.
The Company may enter into derivative instruments to hedge certain net exposures of nonfunctional currency denominated assets and liabilities and the volatility associated with translating earnings for its international businesses into U.S. Dollars, even though it does not elect to apply hedge accounting or hedge accounting does not apply. Gains and losses resulting from a change in fair value for these derivatives are reflected in income in the period in which the change occurs and are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in "Foreign currency transactions and other." Cash flows related to these contracts are classified within "Net cash provided by operating activities" on the cash flow statement.
The Company, from time to time, utilizes derivative instruments to hedge the impact of changes in currency exchange rates on the net assets of its foreign subsidiaries. These instruments are designated as net investment hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness is assessed and measured based on changes in forward exchange rates. The Company records gains and losses on these derivative instruments as currency translation adjustments, which offset a portion of the translation adjustments related to the foreign subsidiary's net assets. Gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" and will be realized upon a partial sale or liquidation of the investment. The Company formally documents all derivatives designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, both at hedge inception and on an on-going basis. These net investment hedges expose the Company to liquidity risk as the derivatives have an immediate cash flow impact upon maturity, which is not offset by the translation of the underlying hedged equity. The cash flows from these contracts are classified within "Net cash used in investing activities" on the cash flow statement.
The Company does not use financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value and its derivative instruments are generally short-term in duration. The derivative instruments do not contain leverage features.
The Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts may fail to meet their contractual obligations. The Company regularly reviews its credit exposure as well as assessing the creditworthiness of its counterparties. See Note 5 for further detail on derivatives.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") issued a new accounting standard on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers that is designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and jurisdictions. The core principle of the standard is that an "entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services." Additionally, the new guidance specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. The new standard will also require enhanced disclosures. The accounting standard is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is not permitted under U.S. GAAP and retrospective application is permitted but not required. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements of adopting this new guidance.
In April 2014, the FASB issued an accounting update which amends the definition of a discontinued operation. The new definition limits discontinued operations reporting to disposals of components of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The new definition includes an acquired business that is classified as held for sale at the date of acquisition. The accounting update requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity. The accounting update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued. The Company adopted this update in the first quarter of 2015 and this accounting update did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB issued an accounting update which provides guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward exists in the same taxing jurisdiction. Per this guidance, an entity must present the unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to a deferred tax asset, except when the carryforward is not available as of the reporting date under the governing tax law to settle taxes or the entity does not intend to use the deferred tax asset for this purpose. This amendment does not impact the recognition or measurement of uncertain tax positions or the disclosure reconciliation of gross unrecognized tax benefits. The update is effective for public companies beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company adopted this update in the first quarter of 2014 and this accounting update did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.
In February 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires entities to provide additional information about items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") to net income. Changes in AOCI balances by component, both before tax and after tax, must be disclosed and significant items reclassified out of AOCI by component must be reported either on the face of the income statement or in a separate footnote to the financial statements. The accounting guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. See Note 14 for information on AOCI balances. There were no reclassifications out of AOCI to net income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted the amended accounting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") concerning the presentation of comprehensive income. The new guidance requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and other comprehensive income. The Company selected to present two consecutive statements. This amended guidance did not change the items that constitute net income or other comprehensive income, the timing of when other comprehensive income is reclassified to net income, or the earnings per share computation.
In September 2011, the FASB issued an accounting update, which amended the guidance on testing goodwill for impairment. Under the revised guidance, entities testing goodwill for impairment have the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. If, based on the qualitative factors, it is more-likely-than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then the unchanged two-step approach previously used would be required. The new accounting guidance did not change how goodwill is calculated, how goodwill is assigned to the
reporting unit, or the requirements for testing goodwill annually or when events and circumstances warrant testing. The accounting update was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. In September 2014, the Company performed its annual quantitative goodwill impairment testing and concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill.
In May 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on fair value to largely achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The new accounting guidance did not extend the use of fair value but rather provided guidance about how fair value should be determined. For U.S. GAAP, most of the changes were clarifications of existing guidance or wording changes to align with IFRS. The amended guidance expanded disclosure, particularly that relating to fair value measurements based on unobservable inputs, permitted fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities on a net position if market or credit risks are managed on a net basis and other criteria are met, and allowed premiums and discounts only if a market participant would also include them in the fair value measurement. This accounting update was effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this accounting guidance, effective with the three months ended March 31, 2012, did not impact the Company's consolidated financial statements or disclosure.
| |
3.
| STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company's 1999 Omnibus Plan, as amended and restated effective June 6, 2013, (the "1999 Plan") is the primary stock compensation plan from which broad-based employee equity awards may be made. As of December 31, 2014, there were 2,650,485 shares of common stock available for future grant under the 1999 Plan. In addition, in connection with the acquisition of KAYAK in May 2013, Buuteeq, Inc. in June 2014 and OpenTable in July 2014, the Company assumed the KAYAK Software Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "KAYAK Plan"), the Buuteeq, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Plan (the "Buuteeq Plan") and the OpenTable, Inc. 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the "OpenTable Plan"). As of December 31, 2014, there were 14,351, 191 and 238,804 shares of common stock available for future grant under the KAYAK Plan, Buuteeq Plan and OpenTable Plan, respectively.
Stock-based compensation issued under the plans generally consists of restricted stock units, performance share units and stock options. The cost of share-based transactions is recognized in the financial statements based upon fair value. Fair value is recognized as expense on a straight line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the employee's requisite service period. The fair value of restricted stock units and performance share units is determined based on the number of shares or units, as applicable, granted and the quoted price of the Company's common stock as of the grant date. Stock-based compensation related to performance share units reflects the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period. The fair value of the employee stock options assumed in acquisitions was determined using the Black-Scholes model and the market value of the Company's common stock at the respective merger date. Stock options granted to employees have a term of 10 years. Restricted stock units, performance share units and restricted stock generally vest over periods from 1 to 4 years. The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the issuance of restricted stock, the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units and performance share units.
Stock-based compensation included in personnel expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was approximately $186.4 million, $140.5 million and $71.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 includes charges amounting to $20.6 million, $24.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, representing the impact of adjusting the estimated probable outcome at the end of the performance period for outstanding unvested performance share units. Included in the stock-based compensation are approximately $2.3 million, $2.1 million, and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, for grants to non-employee directors. The related tax benefit for stock-based compensation is $38.4 million, $18.5 million and $7.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units
The following table summarizes the activity of unvested restricted stock units ("RSUs") and performance share units during the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Share-Based Awards | | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
| | | | | | |
| Unvested at December 31, 2011 | | 799,980 |
| | $ | 231.87 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 95,062 |
| | $ | 643.12 |
| |
| Vested | | (353,819 | ) | | $ | 108.31 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 6,649 |
| | $ | 532.26 |
| |
| Forfeited | | (7,744 | ) | | $ | 444.18 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2012 | | 540,128 |
| | $ | 389.21 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 162,341 |
| | $ | 730.47 |
| |
| Vested | | (258,198 | ) | | $ | 242.63 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 101,490 |
| | $ | 681.13 |
| |
| Forfeited | | (11,442 | ) | | $ | 579.71 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2013 | | 534,319 |
| | $ | 615.10 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| Granted | | 128,484 |
| | $ | 1,308.13 |
| |
| Assumed in an acquisition | | 43,993 |
| | $ | 1,238.68 |
| |
| Vested | | (195,730 | ) | | $ | 492.22 |
| |
| Performance Shares Adjustment | | 68,499 |
| | $ | 1,085.94 |
| |
| Forfeited | | (9,250 | ) | | $ | 972.19 |
| |
| Unvested at December 31, 2014 | | 570,315 |
| | $ | 912.26 |
| |
RSUs and performance share units granted by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 had aggregate grant date fair values of approximately $168.1 million, $118.6 million and $61.1 million, respectively. Share-based awards that vested during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 had grant date fair values of $96.3 million, $62.6 million and $38.3 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2014, there is $263.8 million of total future compensation cost related to unvested share-based awards to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.7 years.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, stock based awards included grants of 72,277 performance share units to executives and certain other employees. The performance share units had a total grant date fair value of $96.1 million based upon the weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $1,329.11. The performance share units are payable in shares of the Company's common stock upon vesting. Stock-based compensation for performance share units is recorded based on the estimated probable outcome if the Company, and with respect to certain grants, the businesses of its subsidiaries, achieve certain financial goals at the end of the performance period. The actual number of shares to be issued on the vesting date will be determined upon completion of the performance period which ends December 31, 2016, assuming there is no accelerated vesting for, among other things, a termination of employment under certain circumstances, or a change in control. At December 31, 2014, there were 72,098 unvested 2014 performance share units outstanding, net of performance share units that were forfeited or vested since the grant date. As of December 31, 2014, the number of shares estimated to be issued pursuant to these performance shares units is a total of 109,618 shares. If the maximum performance thresholds are met at the end of the performance period, a maximum of 145,981 total shares could be issued. If the minimum performance thresholds are not met, 50,884 shares would be issued at the end of the performance period.
2013 Performance Share Units
During the year ended December 31, 2013, stock-based awards included grants of 104,865 performance share units with a grant date fair value of $74.4 million, based on a weighted average grant date fair value of $709.74 per share. The actual number of shares will be determined upon completion of the performance period which ends December 31, 2015.
At December 31, 2014, there were 102,816 unvested 2013 performance share units outstanding, net of performance share units that were forfeited or vested since the grant date. As of December 31, 2014, the number of shares estimated to be issued pursuant to these performance share units at the end of the performance period is a total of 197,225 shares. If the maximum performance thresholds are met at the end of the performance period, a maximum of 225,202 total shares could be issued pursuant to these performance share units. If the minimum performance thresholds are not met, 40,120 shares would be issued at the end of the performance period.
2012 Performance Share Units
During the year ended December 31, 2012, stock-based awards included grants of 60,365 performance share units with a grant date fair value of $39.0 million, based on a weighted average grant date fair value of $645.86 per share. The actual number of shares will be determined after completion of the performance period which ended on December 31, 2014.
At December 31, 2014, there were 57,571 unvested 2012 performance share units outstanding, net of performance share units that were forfeited or vested since the grant date. As of December 31, 2014, the total number of shares expected to be issued pursuant to these performance shares units on the March 4, 2015 vesting date is 100,190 shares.
Stock Options - Other than Stock Options Assumed in Acquisitions
During the year ended December 31, 2014, stock options were exercised for 7,780 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price per share of $22.47. As of December 31, 2014, there were 1,220 shares of common stock subject to outstanding and exercisable stock options with a weighted average exercise price per share of $23.08, a weighted average remaining term of 0.5 years, and an aggregate intrinsic value of $1.4 million. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $9.3 million, $44.9 million and $75.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, there were no outstanding and unvested stock options originally granted by the Company. No stock options were granted by the Company during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Stock Options Assumed in Acquisitions
The following table summarizes for the year ended December 31, 2014 stock option activity for employee stock options assumed in acquisitions:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Assumed Employee Stock Options | | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000's) | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) |
| Balance, January 1, 2013 | | — |
| | | $ | — |
| | | $ | — |
| | 0 |
| Assumed in acquisition | | 540,179 |
| | | $ | 260.96 |
| | | | | |
| Exercised | | (387,669 | ) | | | $ | 222.73 |
| | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (23,802 | ) | | | $ | 478.83 |
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2013 | | 128,708 |
| | | $ | 335.83 |
| | | $ | 106,386 |
| | 6.9 |
| Assumed in acquisitions | | 61,897 |
| | | $ | 457.67 |
| | | | | |
| Exercised | | (43,223 | ) | | | $ | 342.39 |
| | | | | |
| Forfeited | | (2,217 | ) | | | $ | 517.91 |
| | | | | |
| Balance, December 31, 2014 | | 145,165 |
| | | $ | 383.05 |
| | | $ | 109,914 |
| | 6.5 |
| Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2014 | | 88,118 |
| | | $ | 306.32 |
| | | $ | 73,481 |
| | 5.7 |
| Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2014 and expected to vest thereafter, net of estimated forfeitures | | 144,077 |
| | | $ | 382.81 |
| | | $ | 109,124 |
| | 6.5 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised employee stock options assumed in acquisitions during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $39.9 million and $236.9 million, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, employee stock options assumed in acquisitions had a total acquisition date fair value of $45.5 million based on a weighted average acquisition date fair value of $734.76 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, assumed unvested employee stock options vested for 41,524 and 65,293 shares with a fair value of $24.2 million and $30.9 million, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $24.7 million and $30.9 million, respectively related to unvested assumed employee stock options. As of December 31, 2014, there was $36.2 million of total future compensation costs related to unvested assumed employee stock options to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
The following table summarizes, by major security type, the Company's investments as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Available for sale securities: | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign government securities | $ | 52,524 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | 52,490 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 364,276 |
| | 24 |
| | (34 | ) | | 364,266 |
|
| U.S. commercial paper | 621,252 |
| | 15 |
| | (652 | ) | | 620,615 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | 104,829 |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) | | 104,811 |
|
| Total short-term investments | $ | 1,142,881 |
| | $ | 39 |
| | $ | (738 | ) | | $ | 1,142,182 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign government securities | $ | 12,707 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | 12,671 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 557,130 |
| | 80 |
| | (762 | ) | | 556,448 |
|
| U.S. corporate debt securities | 2,332,030 |
| | 2,299 |
| | (5,296 | ) | | 2,329,033 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | 95,108 |
| | 97 |
| | (111 | ) | | 95,094 |
|
| U.S. municipal securities | 1,114 |
| | — |
| | (12 | ) | | 1,102 |
|
| Ctrip corporate debt securities | 500,000 |
| | — |
| | (74,039 | ) | | 425,961 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | 421,930 |
| | — |
| | (86,586 | ) | | 335,344 |
|
| Total long-term investments | $ | 3,920,019 |
| | $ | 2,476 |
| | $ | (166,842 | ) | | $ | 3,755,653 |
|
As of December 31, 2014, foreign government securities included investments in debt securities issued by the governments of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.
In August 2014, the Company used its non-U.S. cash to invest in a five-year Senior Convertible Note issued by Ctrip.com International Ltd. ("Ctrip"). The note was issued at par in an aggregate principal amount of $500 million. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company invested $421.9 million of its non-U.S. cash in Ctrip American Depositary Shares ("ADSs"). The convertible debt and equity securities of Ctrip have been marked to market in accordance with the accounting guidance for available-for-sale securities and at December 31, 2014 show a $74.0 million and $86.6 million unrealized loss, respectively, as a result of decreases in Ctrip's publicly traded shares since the convertible debt and equity purchases were made. In connection with the purchase of the convertible note, Ctrip granted the Company the right to appoint an observer to Ctrip's board of directors and permission to acquire Ctrip shares (including through the acquisition of Ctrip ADSs in the open market) over the twelve months following the purchase date, so that combined with ADSs issuable upon conversion of the note, the Company may hold up to 10% of Ctrip's outstanding equity.
The following table summarizes, by major security type, the Company's short-term investments as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Available for sale securities: | | | | | | | |
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign government securities | $ | 4,019,530 |
| | $ | 233 |
| | $ | (356 | ) | | $ | 4,019,407 |
|
| U.S. government securities | 1,443,083 |
| | 250 |
| | (20 | ) | | 1,443,313 |
|
| Total | $ | 5,462,613 |
| | $ | 483 |
| | $ | (376 | ) | | $ | 5,462,720 |
|
The Company has classified its investments as available-for-sale securities. These securities are carried at estimated fair value with the aggregate unrealized gains and losses related to these investments, net of taxes, reflected as a part of "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Classification as short-term or long-term is based upon the maturity of the debt securities.
There were no significant realized gains or losses related to investments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
| |
5. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
Financial assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and are classified in the categories described in the tables below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| ASSETS: | | | | | | |
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | |
| Money market funds | | $ | 155,608 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 155,608 |
|
| Foreign government securities | | — |
| | 974,855 |
| | 974,855 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 676,503 |
| | 676,503 |
|
| U.S. commercial paper | | — |
| | 427,884 |
| | 427,884 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | | — |
| | 10,000 |
| | 10,000 |
|
| Short-term investments: | | | | | | |
| Foreign government securities | | — |
| | 52,490 |
| | 52,490 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 364,266 |
| | 364,266 |
|
| U.S. commercial paper | | — |
| | 620,615 |
| | 620,615 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | | — |
| | 104,811 |
| | 104,811 |
|
| Foreign exchange derivatives | | — |
| | 336 |
| | 336 |
|
| Long-term investments: | | | | | | |
| Foreign government securities | | — |
| | 12,671 |
| | 12,671 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 556,448 |
| | 556,448 |
|
| U.S. corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 2,329,033 |
| | 2,329,033 |
|
| U.S. government agency securities | | — |
| | 95,094 |
| | 95,094 |
|
| U.S. municipal securities | | — |
| | 1,102 |
| | 1,102 |
|
| Ctrip corporate debt securities | | — |
| | 425,961 |
| | 425,961 |
|
| Ctrip equity securities | | 335,344 |
| | — |
| | 335,344 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | | $ | 490,952 |
| | $ | 6,652,069 |
| | $ | 7,143,021 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| LIABILITIES: | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 129 |
| | $ | 129 |
|
Financial assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and are classified in the categories described in the tables below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| ASSETS: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash equivalents: | | | | | | |
| Money market funds | | $ | 433,850 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 433,850 |
|
| Foreign government securities | | — |
| | 238,202 |
| | 238,202 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 28,000 |
| | 28,000 |
|
| Short-term investments: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign government securities | | — |
| | 4,019,407 |
| | 4,019,407 |
|
| U.S. government securities | | — |
| | 1,443,313 |
| | 1,443,313 |
|
| Foreign exchange derivatives | | — |
| | 292 |
| | 292 |
|
| Total assets at fair value | | $ | 433,850 |
| | $ | 5,729,214 |
| | $ | 6,163,064 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
| LIABILITIES: | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign exchange derivatives | | $ | — |
| | $ | 122,091 |
| | $ | 122,091 |
|
There are three levels of inputs to measure fair value. The definition of each input is described below:
| |
Level 1:
| Quoted prices in active markets that are accessible by the Company at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. |
| |
Level 2:
| Inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Such prices may be based upon quoted prices for identical or comparable securities in active markets or inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. |
| |
Level 3:
| Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. |
Investments in corporate debt securities, sovereign debt, commercial paper, government agency securities and municipal securities are considered "Level 2" valuations because the Company has access to quoted prices, but does not have visibility to the volume and frequency of trading for all of these investments. For the Company's investments, a market approach is used for recurring fair value measurements and the valuation techniques use inputs that are observable, or can be corroborated by observable data, in an active marketplace.
The Company's derivative instruments are valued using pricing models. Pricing models take into account the contract terms as well as multiple inputs where applicable, such as interest rate yield curves, option volatility and currency rates. Derivatives are considered "Level 2" fair value measurements. The Company's derivative instruments are typically short-term in nature.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company's cash consisted of bank deposits and cash held in investment accounts. Other financial assets and liabilities, including restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred merchant bookings are carried at cost which approximates their fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. See Note 4 for information on the carrying value of investments and Note 11 for the estimated fair value of the Company's Senior Convertible Notes.
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivatives. See Note 2 for further information on our accounting policy for derivative financial instruments.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments — The Company is exposed to adverse movements in currency exchange rates as the operating results of its international operations are translated from local currency into U.S. Dollars upon consolidation. The Company's derivative contracts principally address short-term foreign exchange fluctuations for the Euro and British Pound Sterling versus the U.S. Dollar. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no outstanding derivative contracts related to foreign currency translation risk. Foreign exchange gains of $13.7 million, $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were recorded related to these derivatives in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its exposure to the impact of movements in currency exchange rates on its transactional balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Foreign exchange derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2014 associated with foreign currency transaction risks resulted in a net asset of $0.2 million, with an asset in the amount of $0.3 million recorded in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" and a liability in the amount of $0.1 million recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Foreign exchange derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2013 associated with foreign exchange transaction risks resulted in a net liability of $0.5 million, with a liability in the amount of $0.6 million recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" and an asset in the amount of $0.1 million recorded in "Prepaid and other current assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Derivatives associated with these transaction risks resulted in foreign exchange losses of $21.8 million compared to foreign exchange gains of $3.6 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These mark-to-market adjustments on the derivative contracts, offset by the effect of changes in currency exchange rates on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, resulted in net losses of $11.8 million, $5.5 million and $5.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These net impacts are reported in “Foreign currency transactions and other” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The settlement of derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments for the year ended December 31, 2014 resulted in a net cash outflow of $8.9 million, compared to net cash inflows of $4.4 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and were reported within "Net cash provided by operating activities" on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments — The Company had no foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges of its net investment in a foreign subsidiary outstanding as of December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts with a notional value of 3.0 billion Euros to hedge a portion of its net investment in a foreign subsidiary. These contracts were all short-term in nature. Hedge ineffectiveness is assessed and measured based on changes in forward exchange rates. The fair value of these derivatives at December 31, 2013 was a net liability of $121.3 million, with a liability in the amount of $121.5 million recorded in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" and an asset in the amount of $0.2 million recorded in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These hedging instruments generated net cash outflows of $80.3 million and $78.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, compared to a net cash inflows of $82.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and were reported within "Net cash used in investing activities" on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
| |
6.
| ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE RESERVES |
The Company records a provision for uncollectible agency commissions, principally receivables from accommodations related to agency reservations. The Company also accrues for costs associated with merchant transactions made on its websites by individuals using fraudulent credit cards and for other amounts "charged back" as a result of payment disputes. Changes in accounts receivable reserves consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 14,116 |
| | $ | 10,322 |
| | $ | 6,103 |
|
| Provision charged to expense | 22,990 |
| | 16,451 |
| | 16,094 |
|
| Charge-offs and adjustments | (21,546 | ) | | (13,072 | ) | | (11,977 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | (1,348 | ) | | 415 |
| | 102 |
|
| Balance, end of year | $ | 14,212 |
| | $ | 14,116 |
| | $ | 10,322 |
|
The Company computes basic net income per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
Common equivalent shares related to stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance share units are calculated using the treasury stock method. Performance share units are included in the weighted average common equivalent shares based on the number of shares that would be issued if the end of the reporting period were the end of the performance period, if the result would be dilutive.
The Company's convertible debt issues have net share settlement features requiring the Company upon conversion to settle the principal amount of the debt for cash and the conversion premium for cash or shares of the Company's common stock at the Company's option. The convertible notes are included in the calculation of diluted net income per share if their inclusion is dilutive under the treasury stock method.
A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in calculating diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding | 52,301 |
| | 50,924 |
| | 49,840 |
|
| Weighted average dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and performance share units | 340 |
| | 382 |
| | 501 |
|
| Assumed conversion of Convertible Senior Notes | 382 |
| | 1,107 |
| | 985 |
|
| Weighted average number of diluted common and common equivalent shares outstanding | 53,023 |
| | 52,413 |
| | 51,326 |
|
| Anti-dilutive potential common shares | 2,574 |
| | 2,384 |
| | 2,202 |
|
Anti-dilutive potential common shares for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include approximately 2.1 million shares, 2.0 million shares and 2.0 million shares, respectively, that could be issued under the Company's convertible notes if the Company experiences substantial increases in its common stock price. Under the treasury stock method, the convertible notes will generally have a dilutive impact on net income per share if the Company's average stock price for the period exceeds the conversion price for the convertible notes.
In 2006, the Company issued $172.5 million aggregate principal amount of convertible notes due September 30, 2013 (the "2013 Notes"). In 2006, the Company also entered into hedge transactions (the "Conversion Spread Hedges") relating to the potential dilution of the Company's common stock upon conversion of the 2013 Notes at their stated maturity date. The Conversion Spread Hedges were settled in October 2013 and the Company received 42,160 shares of common stock from the counterparties. The settlement was accounted for as an equity transaction. Since the impact of the Conversion Spread Hedges
was anti-dilutive, it was excluded from the calculation of net income per share until the shares of common stock were received in October 2013.
Property and equipment at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | Estimated Useful Lives (years) |
| Computer equipment and software | $ | 332,650 |
| | $ | 244,845 |
| | 2 to 5 |
| Office equipment, furniture, fixtures & leasehold improvements | 110,297 |
| | 67,942 |
| | 2 to 11 |
| Total | 442,947 |
| | 312,787 |
| | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (243,994 | ) | | (177,734 | ) | | |
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 198,953 |
| | $ | 135,053 |
| | |
Fixed asset depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $78.2 million, $48.4 million and $32.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
| |
9. | INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL |
The Company's intangible assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 | | | | |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Amortization Period | | Weighted Average Useful Life |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Supply and distribution agreements | $ | 842,642 |
| | $ | (188,441 | ) | | $ | 654,201 |
| | $ | 581,742 |
| | $ | (160,499 | ) | | $ | 421,243 |
| | 10 - 20 years | | 16 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Technology | 108,987 |
| | (43,746 | ) | | 65,241 |
| | 93,322 |
| | (29,271 | ) | | 64,051 |
| | 1 - 5 years | | 5 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Patents | 1,623 |
| | (1,524 | ) | | 99 |
| | 1,623 |
| | (1,478 | ) | | 145 |
| | 15 years | | 15 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Internet domain names | 41,652 |
| | (16,895 | ) | | 24,757 |
| | 45,799 |
| | (12,112 | ) | | 33,687 |
| | 2 - 20 years | | 8 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trade names | 1,674,218 |
| | (100,850 | ) | | 1,573,368 |
| | 548,243 |
| | (47,388 | ) | | 500,855 |
| | 5 - 20 years | | 20 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-compete agreements | 21,000 |
| | (3,908 | ) | | 17,092 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 years | | 3 years |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | 141 |
| | (138 | ) | | 3 |
| | 141 |
| | (137 | ) | | 4 |
| | 3 - 10 years | | 3 years |
| Total intangible assets | $ | 2,690,263 |
| | $ | (355,502 | ) | | $ | 2,334,761 |
| | $ | 1,270,870 |
| | $ | (250,885 | ) | | $ | 1,019,985 |
| | | | |
Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets amortization expense is approximately $129.6 million, $69.6 million and $32.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The annual estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years and thereafter is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| 2015 | $ | 171,007 |
|
| 2016 | 167,887 |
|
| 2017 | 160,296 |
|
| 2018 | 141,776 |
|
| 2019 | 131,727 |
|
| Thereafter | 1,562,068 |
|
| | $ | 2,334,761 |
|
A roll-forward of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 1,767,912 |
| | $ | 522,672 |
|
| Acquisitions | 1,590,829 |
| | 1,232,342 |
|
| Currency translation adjustments | (32,267 | ) | | 12,898 |
|
| Balance, end of year | $ | 3,326,474 |
| | $ | 1,767,912 |
|
A substantial portion of the intangibles and goodwill relates to the acquisition of OpenTable in July 2014 and KAYAK in May 2013. See Note 20 for further information on these acquisitions.
In September 2014, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment testing using standard valuation techniques. Since the annual impairment test, there have been no events or changes in circumstances to indicate a potential impairment.
Other assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Deferred debt issuance costs | $ | 27,204 |
| | $ | 16,465 |
|
| Security deposits | 12,368 |
| | 10,617 |
|
| Deferred tax assets | 8,548 |
| | 7,055 |
|
| Other | 9,228 |
| | 6,432 |
|
| Total | $ | 57,348 |
| | $ | 40,569 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs arose from (i) the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 1.0% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2018, issued in March 2012; (ii) a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility entered into in October 2011; (iii) the $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes, due March 15, 2015, issued in March 2010; (iv) the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 0.35% Convertible Senior Notes, due June 15, 2020, issued in May 2013; (v) the $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 0.9% Convertible Senior Notes, due September 15, 2021, issued in August 2014; and (vi) the 1.0 billion Euro aggregate principal amount of 2.375% Senior Notes, due September 23, 2024, issued in September 2014. Deferred debt issuance costs are being amortized using the effective interest rate method and the period of amortization was determined at inception of the related debt agreements based upon the stated maturity dates. Unamortized debt issuance costs written off to interest expense in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to early conversion of convertible debt and amounted to $0.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
Revolving Credit Facility
In October 2011, the Company entered into a $1.0 billionfive-year unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of lenders. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear interest, at the Company's option, at a rate per annum equal to either (i) the adjusted LIBOR for the interest period in effect for such borrowing plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.00% to 1.50%; or (ii) the greatest of (a) JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association's prime lending rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, and (c) an adjusted LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50%. Undrawn balances available under the revolving credit facility are subject to commitment fees at the applicable rate ranging from 0.10% to 0.25%.
The revolving credit facility provides for the issuance of up to $100.0 million of letters of credit as well as borrowings of up to $50 million on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros, British Pounds Sterling and any other foreign currency agreed to by the lenders. The proceeds of loans made under the facility will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The Company funded the acquisition of OpenTable in July 2014 from cash on hand in the United States and $995 million borrowed under the Company's revolving credit facility, which the Company repaid during the third quarter of 2014. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no borrowings under the facility, and approximately $4.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued under the facility.
Outstanding Debt
Outstanding debt as of December 31, 2014 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2014 | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | Unamortized Debt Discount | | Carrying Value |
| Short-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2015 | | $ | 37,524 |
| | $ | (329 | ) | | $ | 37,195 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2018 | | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | (74,834 | ) | | $ | 925,166 |
|
| 0.35% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2020 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (138,114 | ) | | 861,886 |
|
| 0.9% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2021 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (136,299 | ) | | 863,701 |
|
| 2.375% (€1 Billion) Senior Notes due September 2024 | | 1,210,068 |
| | (11,065 | ) | | 1,199,003 |
|
| Total long-term debt | | $ | 4,210,068 |
| | $ | (360,312 | ) | | $ | 3,849,756 |
|
Outstanding debt as of December 31, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2013 | | Outstanding Principal Amount | | Unamortized Debt Discount | | Carrying Value |
| Short-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.25% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2015 | | $ | 160,464 |
| | $ | (8,533 | ) | | $ | 151,931 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt: | | | | | | |
| 1.0% Convertible Senior Notes due March 2018 | | $ | 1,000,000 |
| | $ | (96,797 | ) | | $ | 903,203 |
|
| 0.35% Convertible Senior Notes due June 2020 | | 1,000,000 |
| | (161,156 | ) | | 838,844 |
|
| Total long-term debt | | $ | 2,000,000 |
| | $ | (257,953 | ) | | $ | 1,742,047 |
|
Based upon the closing price of the Company's common stock for the prescribed measurement periods during the three months ended December 31, 2013, the contingent conversion threshold on the 2015 Notes (as defined below) was exceeded.
The 2015 Notes became convertible on December 15, 2014, at the option of the holders, and will remain convertible until the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date of March 15, 2015, regardless of the Company's stock price. Therefore, the 2015 Notes were convertible at the option of the holders as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and accordingly the Company reported the carrying value of the 2015 Notes as a current liability as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Since these notes are convertible at the option of the holders and the principal amount is required to be paid in cash, the difference between the principal amount and the carrying value is reflected as convertible debt in the mezzanine section on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Therefore, with respect to the 2015 Notes, the Company reclassified the unamortized debt discount for these 1.25% Notes in the amount of $0.3 million and $8.5 million before tax as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from additional paid-in-capital to convertible debt in the mezzanine section on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The contingent conversion thresholds on the 2018 Notes (as defined below), the 2020 Notes (as defined below) and the 2021 Notes (as defined below) were not exceeded at December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013, and therefore these Notes are reported as a non-current liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Fair Value of Debt
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the estimated market value of the outstanding Senior Notes was approximately $4.8 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, and was considered a "Level 2" fair value measurement (see Note 5). Fair value was estimated based upon actual trades at the end of the reporting period or the most recent trade available as well as the Company's stock price at the end of the reporting period. A substantial portion of the market value of the Company's debt in excess of the outstanding principal amount relates to the conversion premium on the Convertible Senior Notes.
Convertible Debt
If the note holders exercise their option to convert, the Company is required to deliver cash to repay the principal amount of the notes and may deliver shares of common stock or cash, at its option, to satisfy the conversion value in excess of the principal amount. In cases where holders decide to convert prior to the maturity date, the Company writes off the proportionate amount of remaining debt issuance costs to interest expense. In the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid $122.9 million to satisfy the aggregate principal amount due and issued 300,256 shares of its common stock and paid cash of $2.2 million in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount for debt converted prior to maturity. In the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company delivered cash of $414.6 million to repay the principal amount and issued 972,235 shares of its common stock in satisfaction of the conversion value in excess of the principal amount for convertible debt that was converted prior to maturity.
Description of Senior Convertible Notes
In August 2014, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due September 15, 2021, with an interest rate of 0.9% (the "2021 Notes"). The Company paid $11.0 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2014, related to this offering. The 2021 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $2,055.50 per share. The 2021 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to September 15, 2021, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the applicable conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2021 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2021 Notes in an aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $375 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of June 15, 2021, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2021 Notes. The 2021 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2021 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
In May 2013, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due June 15, 2020, with an interest rate of 0.35% (the "2020 Notes"). The 2020 Notes were issued with an initial discount of $20.0 million. The Company paid $1.0 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2013, related to this offering. The 2020 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $1,315.10 per share. The 2020 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to
June 15, 2020, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the applicable conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2020 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2020 Notes in an aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $397 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of March 15, 2020, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2020 Notes. The 2020 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2020 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2020 Notes is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
In March 2012, the Company issued in a private placement $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2018, with an interest rate of 1.0% (the "2018 Notes"). The Company paid $20.9 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2012, related to this offering. The 2018 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $944.61 per share. The 2018 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to March 15, 2018, upon the occurrence of specific events, including but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the applicable conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. In the event that all or substantially all of the Company's common stock is acquired on or prior to the maturity of the 2018 Notes in a transaction in which the consideration paid to holders of the Company's common stock consists of all or substantially all cash, the Company would be required to make additional payments in the form of additional shares of common stock to the holders of the 2018 Notes in aggregate value ranging from $0 to approximately $344 million depending upon the date of the transaction and the then current stock price of the Company. As of December 15, 2017, holders will have the right to convert all or any portion of the 2018 Notes. The 2018 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2018 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2018 Notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
In March 2010, the Company issued in a private placement $575.0 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes due March 15, 2015, with an interest rate of 1.25% (the "2015 Notes"). The Company paid $13.3 million in debt issuance costs associated with the 2015 Notes for the year ended December 31, 2010. The 2015 Notes are convertible, subject to certain conditions, into the Company's common stock at a conversion price of approximately $303.06 per share. The 2015 Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, prior to March 15, 2015, upon the occurrence of specified events, including, but not limited to a change in control, or if the closing sales price of the Company's common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 150% of the applicable conversion price in effect for the notes on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. The 2015 Notes are currently convertible and will remain convertible until the trading day prior to the maturity date of March 15, 2015, regardless of the Company's stock price. The 2015 Notes may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity. The holders may require the Company to repurchase the 2015 Notes for cash in certain circumstances. Interest on the 2015 Notes is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each year.
Accounting guidance requires that cash-settled convertible debt, such as the Company's Convertible Senior Notes, be separated into debt and equity components at issuance and each be assigned a value. The value assigned to the debt component is the estimated fair value, as of the issuance date, of a similar bond without the conversion feature. The difference between the bond cash proceeds and this estimated fair value, representing the value assigned to the equity component, is recorded as a debt discount. Debt discount is amortized using the effective interest method over the period from the origination date through the stated maturity date. The Company estimated the straight debt borrowing rates at debt origination to be 5.89% for the 2015 Notes, 3.50% for the 2018 Notes, 3.13% for the 2020 Notes and 3.18% for the 2021 Notes. The yield to maturity was estimated at an at-market coupon priced at par.
Debt discount after tax of $69.1 million ($115.2 million before tax) net of financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $1.6 million after tax were recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2015 Notes in March 2010. Debt discount after tax of $80.9 million ($135.2 million before tax) net of financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $2.8 million after tax were recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2018 Notes in March 2012. Debt discount after tax of $92.4 million ($154.3 million before tax) and financing costs associated with the equity component of convertible debt of $0.1 million after tax were recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2020 Notes at June 30, 2013. Debt discount after tax of $82.5 million ($142.9 million before tax) net of financing costs associated
with the equity component of convertible debt of $1.6 million after tax were recorded in additional paid-in capital related to the 2021 Notes at December 31, 2014.
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized interest expense of $75.3 million, $78.2 million and $59.4 million, respectively, related to convertible notes, comprised of $17.1 million, $17.7 million and $15.2 million, respectively, for the contractual coupon interest, $54.4 million, $55.7 million and $39.8 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt discount and $3.8 million, $4.8 million and $4.4 million, respectively, related to the amortization of debt issuance costs. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, included in the amortization of debt discount mentioned above was $2.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of original issuance discount amortization related to the 2020 Notes. In addition, the Company incurred interest expense for the write off of unamortized debt issuance costs related to debt conversions of $0.5 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The remaining period for amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs is the period until the stated maturity date for the respective debt. The weighted-average effective interest rates for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 are 3.5%, 4.5% and 4.8%, respectively.
In addition, if the Company's convertible debt is redeemed or converted prior to maturity, a gain or loss on extinguishment is recognized. The gain or loss is the difference between the fair value of the debt component immediately prior to extinguishment and its carrying value. To estimate the fair value of the debt at the conversion date, the Company estimated its straight debt borrowing rate, considering its credit rating and straight debt of comparable corporate issuers. For the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized non-cash losses of $6.3 million ($3.8 million after tax) and $26.7 million ($16.2 million after tax), respectively, in "Foreign currency transactions and other" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in connection with the conversion of the 2015 Notes.
Euro Denominated Debt
In September 2014, the Company issued Senior Notes due September 23, 2024, with an interest rate of 2.375% (the "2024 Notes") for an aggregate principal amount of 1.0 billion Euros. The 2024 Notes were issued with an initial discount of 9.4 million Euros. In addition, the Company paid $6.5 million in debt issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2014. Interest on the 2024 Notes is payable annually on September 23, beginning September 23, 2015. Subject to certain limited exceptions, all payments of interest and principal, including payments made upon any redemption of the 2024 Notes, will be made in Euros.
The aggregate principal value of the 2024 Notes and accrued interest thereon are designated as a hedge of the Company's net investment in a Euro functional currency subsidiary. The foreign currency transaction gains or losses on these liabilities are measured based on changes in spot rates and are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Euro denominated net assets of the subsidiary are translated into U.S. Dollars at each balance sheet date, with effects of foreign currency changes also reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Since the notional amount of the recorded Euro denominated debt and related interest are not greater than the notional amount of the Company's net investment, the Company does not expect to incur any ineffectiveness on this hedge.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized interest expense of $8.6 million related to the 2024 Notes. The remaining period for amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs is the stated maturity date for this debt. The effective interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 was 2.5%.
In the second quarter of 2013, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a program to purchase $1.0 billion of the Company's common stock, in addition to amounts previously authorized. In the second quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased 431,910 shares for an aggregate cost of $345.5 million in privately negotiated, off-market transactions and in the third and fourth quarters of 2014, the Company repurchased 114,645 shares of its common stock in privately negotiated, off-market transactions and 438,897 shares of its common stock in the open market for aggregate costs of $147.3 million and $500.0 million, respectively, related to this authorization. The Company has $7.2 million remaining to repurchase common stock related to this authorization.
In connection with the issuance of the 2018 Notes, the Company repurchased 263,913 shares in the first quarter of 2012 for an aggregate cost of $166.2 million.
In the third quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased 484,361 shares for an aggregate cost of $459.2 million. These shares were covered under our remaining authorizations as of December 31, 2012 to repurchase common stock.
In October 2013, the Company settled Conversion Spread Hedges and received 42,160 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $43.1 million, from the counterparties (see Note 7 for further detail on the Conversion Spread Hedges).
The Board of Directors has also given the Company the general authorization to repurchase shares of its common stock to satisfy employee withholding tax obligations related to stock-based compensation. In the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company repurchased 77,761, 113,503, and 141,229 shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $103.1 million, $78.8 million and $90.8 million, respectively, to satisfy employee withholding taxes related to stock-based compensation.
The Company may make additional repurchases of shares under its stock repurchase program, depending on prevailing market conditions, alternate uses of capital and other factors. On February 5, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to an additional $3.0 billion of the Company's common stock. Whether and when to initiate and/or complete any purchase of common stock and the amount of common stock purchased will be determined in the Company's complete discretion. As of December 31, 2014, there were approximately 9.9 million shares of the Company's common stock held in treasury.
| |
13. | REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
On May 18, 2010, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, priceline.com International Ltd. ("PIL"), paid $108.5 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase a controlling interest of the outstanding equity of TravelJigsaw Holdings Limited (now known as rentalcars.com), a Manchester, U.K.-based international rental car reservation service. Certain key members of rentalcars.com's management team retained a noncontrolling ownership interest in rentalcars.com. In addition, certain key members of the management team of Booking.com purchased a 3% ownership interest in rentalcars.com from PIL in June 2010 (together with rentalcars.com management's investment, the "Redeemable Shares"). The holders of the Redeemable Shares had the right to put their shares to PIL and PIL had the right to call the shares in each case at a purchase price reflecting the fair value of the Redeemable Shares at the time of exercise. Subject to certain exceptions, one-third of the Redeemable Shares were subject to the put and call options in each of 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, during specified option exercise periods.
In April 2012 and 2011, in connection with the exercise of call and put options, PIL purchased a portion of the shares underlying redeemable noncontrolling interests for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $61.1 million and $13.0 million, respectively. As a result of the April 2011 purchase, the redeemable noncontrolling interests in rentalcars.com were reduced from 24.4% to 19.0%. As a result of the April 2012 purchase, the redeemable noncontrolling interests in rentalcars.com were further reduced to 12.7%. In April 2013, in connection with the exercise of the March 2013 call and put options, PIL purchased the remaining outstanding shares underlying redeemable noncontrolling interests for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $192.5 million.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests are measured at fair value, both at the date of acquisition and subsequently at each reporting period. The redeemable noncontrolling interests are reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in mezzanine equity in "Redeemable noncontrolling interests."
A reconciliation of redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 160,287 |
| | $ | 127,045 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 135 |
| | 4,471 |
|
Fair value adjustments(1) | 42,522 |
| | 84,693 |
|
Purchase of subsidiary shares at fair value(1) | (192,530 | ) | | (61,079 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | (10,414 | ) | | 5,157 |
|
| Balance, end of period | $ | — |
| | $ | 160,287 |
|
_____________________________
(1)The fair value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests was determined by industry peer comparable analysis and a discounted cash flow valuation model.
| |
14. | ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
The table below provides the balances for each classification of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (1) | $ | (102,758 | ) | | $ | 84,598 |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, net of tax (2) | (157,144 | ) | | 131 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (259,902 | ) | | $ | 84,729 |
|
_____________________________
(1)Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, includes net losses from fair value adjustments at December 31, 2014of $37.8 million after tax ($57.8 million before tax) and a net losses from fair value adjustments at December 31, 2013 of $58.7 million after tax ($98.8 million before tax) associated with derivatives designated as net investment hedges (see Note 5).
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax, includes foreign currency transaction gains at December 31, 2014 of $48.3 million after tax ($83.8 million before tax) associated with the Company's 2024 Notes, which are Euro denominated debt, designated as a net investment hedge (see Note 11).
The remaining balance in currency translation adjustments excludes income taxes as a result of the Company's intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries outside of the United States.
(2)The unrealized loss before tax at December 31, 2014 was $164.7 million compared to an unrealized gain before tax at December 31, 2013 of $0.2 million.
International pre-tax income was $2.9 billion, $2.2 billion and $1.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Domestic pre-tax income was $98.4 million, $48.5 million, and $95.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 496,719 |
| | $ | (10,613 | ) | | $ | 486,106 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 10,316 |
| | 47,847 |
| | 58,163 |
|
| U.S. State | 28,953 |
| | (5,527 | ) | | 23,426 |
|
| Total | $ | 535,988 |
| | $ | 31,707 |
| | $ | 567,695 |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 396,162 |
| | $ | (16,314 | ) | | $ | 379,848 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 5,250 |
| | 11,454 |
| | 16,704 |
|
| U.S. State | 13,431 |
| | (6,244 | ) | | 7,187 |
|
| Total | $ | 414,843 |
| | $ | (11,104 | ) | | $ | 403,739 |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Current | | Deferred | | Total |
| International | $ | 302,352 |
| | $ | (13,792 | ) | | $ | 288,560 |
|
| U.S. Federal | 3,681 |
| | 37,956 |
| | 41,637 |
|
| U.S. State | 12,203 |
| | (4,568 | ) | | 7,635 |
|
| Total | $ | 318,236 |
| | $ | 19,596 |
| | $ | 337,832 |
|
The Company has significant deferred tax assets, resulting principally from U.S. net operating loss carryforwards ("NOLs"). The amount of NOLs available for the Company's use is limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC Section 382"). IRC Section 382 imposes limitations on the availability of a company's NOLs after a more than 50% ownership change occurs. It was determined that ownership changes, as defined in IRC Section 382 have occurred. The amount of the Company's NOLs incurred prior to each ownership change is limited based on the value of the Company on the respective dates of ownership change.
At December 31, 2014, after considering the impact of IRC Section 382, the Company had approximately $1.2 billion of available NOL's for U.S. federal income tax purposes, comprised of approximately $22 million of NOLs generated from operating losses and approximately $1.2 billion of NOLs generated from equity-related transactions, including equity-based compensation and stock warrants. The NOLs mainly expire from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2021. The utilization of these NOLs is dependent upon the Company's ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in the United States. The Company periodically evaluates the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets, and reduces the carrying amount of these deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of the deferred tax assets, including its recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future income, the carryforward periods available for tax reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Deferred tax assets/(liabilities): | |
| | |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward — U.S. | $ | 176,786 |
| | $ | 263,994 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward — International | 22,353 |
| | 21,660 |
|
| Fixed assets | — |
| | 818 |
|
| Accrued expenses | 41,117 |
| | 22,708 |
|
| Stock-based compensation and other stock based payments | 54,935 |
| | 40,346 |
|
| Other | 24,456 |
| | 33,530 |
|
| Subtotal | 319,647 |
| | 383,056 |
|
| | | | |
| Discount on convertible notes | (141,193 | ) | | (97,550 | ) |
| Intangible assets and other | (856,807 | ) | | (356,669 | ) |
| Euro denominated debt | (35,441 | ) | | — |
|
| Fixed assets | (3,409 | ) | | — |
|
| Less valuation allowance on deferred tax assets | (161,997 | ) | | (173,558 | ) |
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)(1) | $ | (879,200 | ) | | $ | (244,721 | ) |
(1) Includes non-current deferred tax assets of $8.5 million and $7.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, reported in "Other assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and current deferred tax liabilities of $1.2 million and $38 thousand as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, reported in "Accrued expenses and other current liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $162.0 million at December 31, 2014 includes $140.4 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards derived from equity transactions and $21.6 million related to international operations. Additionally, since January 1, 2006, the Company has generated additional federal tax benefits of
$250.0 million related to equity transactions that are not included in the deferred tax asset table above. Pursuant to accounting guidance, these tax benefits related to equity deductions will be recognized by crediting paid in capital, if and when they are realized by reducing the Company's current income tax liability.
It is the practice and intention of the Company to reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. Thus at December 31, 2014, no provision had been made for U.S. taxes on approximately $7.3 billion of international earnings because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be payable if such earnings were not indefinitely reinvested.
At December 31, 2014, the Company has approximately $673.4 million of U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards that expire mainly between December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2033, $131.2 million of non-U.S. net operating loss carryforwards, of which $49.3 million expire between December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2021 and $3.7 million which expire between December 31, 2028 and December 31, 2030, and $1.7 million of foreign capital allowance carryforwards that do not expire. At December 31, 2014, the Company also had approximately $29.6 million of U.S. research credit carryforwards that mainly expire between December 31, 2033 and December 31, 2034 and are also subject to annual limitation.
A significant portion of the Company's taxable earnings are derived from the Netherlands. Under Dutch corporate income tax law, income generated from qualifying innovative activities is taxed at a rate of 5% ("Innovation Box Tax") rather than the Dutch statutory rate of 25%. Booking.com obtained a ruling from the Dutch tax authorities in February 2011 confirming that a portion of its earnings ("qualifying earnings") is eligible for Innovation Box Tax treatment. The ruling from the Dutch tax authorities is valid until December 31, 2017.
The effective income tax rate of the Company is different from the amount computed using the expected U.S. statutory federal rate of 35% as a result of the following items (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Income tax expense at federal statutory rate | $ | 1,046,307 |
| | $ | 803,788 |
| | $ | 616,654 |
|
| Adjustment due to: | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Foreign rate differential | (289,692 | ) | | (226,894 | ) | | (175,932 | ) |
| Innovation Box Tax benefit | (233,545 | ) | | (177,195 | ) | | (118,916 | ) |
| Other | 44,625 |
| | 4,040 |
| | 16,026 |
|
| Income tax expense | $ | 567,695 |
| | $ | 403,739 |
| | $ | 337,832 |
|
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions based on a two step approach of recognition and measurement. The first step involves assessing whether the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination based upon its technical merits. The second step involves measurement of the amount to recognize. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are measured at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate finalization with the taxing authority.
The following is a reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
| Unrecognized tax benefit — January 1 | $ | 22,104 |
| | $ | 7,343 |
| | $ | 3,192 |
|
| Gross increases — tax positions in current period | 9,305 |
| | 8,597 |
| | 4,423 |
|
| Gross increases — tax positions in prior periods | 6,569 |
| | 3,507 |
| | 343 |
|
| Increase acquired in business combination | 17,767 |
| | 7,089 |
| | — |
|
| Gross decreases — tax positions in prior periods | (2,164 | ) | | (495 | ) | | (615 | ) |
| Reduction due to lapse in statute of limitations | (346 | ) | | (3,937 | ) | | — |
|
| Reduction due to settlements during the current period | (879 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Unrecognized tax benefit — December 31 | $ | 52,356 |
| | $ | 22,104 |
| | $ | 7,343 |
|
The unrecognized tax benefits are included in "Other long-term liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The Company does not expect further significant changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.
The Company's Netherlands, U.S. federal and Connecticut, Singapore, and U.K. income tax returns, constituting the returns of the major taxing jurisdictions, are subject to examination by the taxing authorities as prescribed by applicable statute. The statute of limitations remains open for: the Company's Netherlands returns from 2008 and forward; the Company's Singapore returns from 2011 and forward; the Company's U.S. Federal and Connecticut returns from 2011 and forward; and the Company's U.K. returns for the tax years 2008, 2013, and 2014. No income tax waivers have been executed that would extend the period subject to examination beyond the period prescribed by statute in the major taxing jurisdictions in which the company is a taxpayer.
| |
16. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Competition Reviews
In July 2012, the Office of Fair Trading (the "OFT"), the predecessor competition authority in the United Kingdom to the Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA"), issued a "Statement of Objections" ("SO") to Booking.com, which set out the OFT's preliminary views on why it believed Booking.com and others in the online hotel reservation industry were allegedly in breach of E.U. and U.K. competition law. The SO alleged, among other things, that there were agreements or concerted practices between hotels and Booking.com and between hotels and at least one other OTC that restricted Booking.com's (and the other OTC's) ability to discount hotel room reservations, which the OFT alleged was a form of resale price maintenance. The Company disputes the allegations in the SO.
On January 31, 2014, the OFT announced that it had accepted commitments offered by Booking.com, as well as Expedia and Intercontinental Hotel Group, (the "Commitments") to close the investigation on the basis that they address the OFT's competition concerns. The OFT closed its investigation with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine.
The Commitments provide, among other things, that hotels will continue to be able to set retail prices for hotel room reservations on all OTC websites, such as Booking.com. Under the Commitments, OTCs, such as Booking.com, have the flexibility to discount a hotel's retail price, but only to members of closed groups, a concept that is defined in the Commitments, who have previously made a reservation through the OTC. The discount may be up to Booking.com's commission. In addition, the Commitments provide that Booking.com will not require rate parity from hotels in relation to discounted rates that are provided by other OTCs or hotels to members of their closed groups, provided the discounted rate is not made public. The Commitments apply to bookings by European Economic Area residents at U.K. hotels.
On March 31, 2014, Skyscanner, a meta-search site based in the United Kingdom, filed an appeal in the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") against the OFT's decision to accept the Commitments. Booking.com intervened in support of the CMA in the CAT. In its decision dated September 26, 2014, the CAT found that the CMA was wrong to reject Skyscanner's arguments about the negative impact of the Commitments on its business and price transparency generally without properly exploring these arguments. The CAT's decision vacates the CMA's Commitments decision and remits the matter to the CMA for reconsideration in accordance with the CAT's ruling. The CMA did not appeal the CAT's decision. It is uncertain what action the CMA will take in response to the CAT's ruling, which could involve re-opening, closing or suspending the investigation.
Investigations have also been opened by the national competition authorities in the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Hungary, Sweden, Ireland, Denmark and Switzerland that focus on Booking.com's rate parity clause in its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions. Competition related inquiries have also been received from the competition authority in China. The Company is in ongoing discussions with the relevant regulatory authorities regarding their concerns. The Company is currently unable to predict the outcome of these investigations or how the Company's business may be affected. Possible outcomes include requiring Booking.com to amend or remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with accommodation providers in those jurisdictions and/or the imposition of fines.
On December 15, 2014, the French, Italian and Swedish national competition authorities, working in close cooperation with the European Commission, announced their intention to seek public feedback on commitments offered by Booking.com in connection with investigations of Booking.com's rate parity provisions in its contractual arrangements with accommodation providers. If the proposed commitments are accepted by the French, Italian and Swedish competition authorities, the investigations in those countries will be closed with no finding of infringement or admission of wrongdoing and no imposition of a fine. Under the terms of the proposed commitments, Booking.com would replace its existing price parity agreements with accommodation providers - sometimes also referred to as "most favored nation" or "MFN" provisions - with "narrow" price parity agreements. Under the "narrow" price parity agreement, an accommodation provider would still be required to offer the
same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to a consumer directly, but it would no longer be required to offer the same or better rates on Booking.com as it offered to other on-line travel companies. If the commitments are accepted by the French, Italian and Swedish competition authorities after they have been market tested, Booking.com will implement the commitments within six months of their being accepted. The Company is currently unable to predict the outcome of the market test of the proposed commitments offered in France, Italy and Sweden or the impact the proposed commitments in France, Italy and Sweden will have on the on-going investigations in other European countries or how its business may be affected by the proposed commitments if accepted. The Company notes that the German competition authority has required Hotel Reservation Service to remove its rate parity clause from its contracts with hotels, and Hotel Reservation Service's initial appeal was denied. To the extent that regulatory authorities require changes to the Company's business practices or to those currently common to the industry, the Company's business, competitive position and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Negative publicity regarding any such investigations could adversely affect the Company's brands and therefore its market share and results of operations.
Lawsuits Alleging Antitrust Violations
On August 20, 2012, one complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased hotel room reservations from certain hotels (the "Hotel Defendants") through certain OTC defendants, including the Company. The initial complaint, Turik v. Expedia, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-4365, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleged that the Hotel Defendants and the OTC defendants violated U.S. federal and state laws by entering into a conspiracy to enforce a minimum resale price maintenance scheme pursuant to which putative class members paid inflated prices for hotel room reservations that they purchased through the OTC defendants. Thirty-one other complaints containing similar allegations were filed in a number of federal jurisdictions across the country. Plaintiffs in these actions sought treble damages and injunctive relief.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated all of the pending cases under 28 U.S.C. §1407 before Judge Boyle in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. On May 1, 2013, an amended consolidated complaint was filed.
On February 18, 2014, Judge Boyle dismissed the amended consolidated complaint without prejudice. On October 27, 2014 the court denied plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a proposed Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, and on October 28, 2014 the court issued a final judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. The time to appeal the court's October 27, 2014 decision has expired and the matter is closed.
Litigation Related to Travel Transaction Taxes
The Company and certain third-party online travel companies ("OTCs") are currently involved in approximately forty lawsuits, including certified and putative class actions, brought by or against U.S. states, cities and counties over issues involving the payment of travel transaction taxes (e.g., hotel occupancy taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes, etc.). The Company's subsidiaries priceline.com LLC, Lowestfare.com LLC and Travelweb LLC are named in some but not all of these cases. Generally, the complaints allege, among other things, that the OTCs violated each jurisdiction's respective relevant travel transaction tax ordinance with respect to the charge and remittance of amounts to cover taxes under each law. The complaints typically seek compensatory damages, disgorgement, penalties available by law, attorneys' fees and other relief. In addition, approximately seventy-nine municipalities or counties, and at least eleven states, have initiated audit proceedings (including proceedings initiated by more than forty municipalities in California, which have been inactive for several years), issued proposed tax assessments or started inquiries relating to the payment of travel transaction taxes. Additional state and local jurisdictions are likely to assert that the Company is subject to travel transaction taxes and could seek to collect such taxes, retroactively and/or prospectively.
With respect to the principal claims in these matters, the Company believes that the laws at issue do not apply to the services it provides, namely the facilitation of travel reservations, and, therefore, that it does not owe the taxes that are claimed to be owed. Rather, the Company believes that the laws at issue generally impose travel transaction taxes on entities that own, operate or control hotels (or similar businesses) or furnish or provide hotel rooms or similar accommodations or other travel services. In addition, in many of these matters, the taxing jurisdictions have asserted claims for "conversion" - essentially, that the Company has collected a tax and wrongfully "pocketed" those tax dollars - a claim that the Company believes is without basis and has vigorously contested. The taxing jurisdictions that are currently involved in litigation and other proceedings with the Company, and that may be involved in future proceedings, have asserted contrary positions and will likely continue to do so. From time to time, the Company has found it expedient to settle, and may in the future agree to settle, claims pending in these matters without conceding that the claims at issue are meritorious or that the claimed taxes are in fact due to be paid.
In connection with some of these tax audits and assessments, the Company may be required to pay any assessed taxes, which amounts may be substantial, prior to being allowed to contest the assessments and the applicability of the laws in judicial proceedings. This requirement is commonly referred to as "pay to play" or "pay first." For example, the City and County of San Francisco assessed the Company approximately $3.4 million (an amount that includes interest and penalties) relating to hotel occupancy taxes, which the Company paid in July 2009, and issued a second assessment totaling approximately $2.7 million, which the Company paid in January 2013. Payment of these amounts, if any, is not an admission that the Company believes it is subject to such taxes. In the San Francisco action, for example, the court ruled in February 2013 that the Company and OTCs do not owe transient accommodations tax to the city and ordered the city to refund the amount paid in July 2009; the Company also is seeking a refund of the amount paid in January 2013. San Francisco has appealed the court's ruling and has not refunded the amount paid in July 2009 pending resolution of the appeal. The matter has been stayed while the appeal in another case with the City of San Diego is pending before the California Supreme Court.
Litigation is subject to uncertainty and there could be adverse developments in these pending or future cases and proceedings. For example, in January 2013, the Tax Appeal Court for the State of Hawaii held that the Company and other OTCs are not liable for the State's transient accommodations tax, but held that the OTCs, including the Company, are liable for the State's general excise tax on the full amount the OTC collects from the customer for a hotel room reservation, without any offset for amounts passed through to the hotel. The Company recorded an accrual for travel transaction taxes (including estimated interest and penalties), with a corresponding charge to cost of revenues, of approximately $16.5 million in December 2012 and approximately $18.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2013, primarily related to this ruling. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, the Company paid approximately $20.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, to the State of Hawaii related to this ruling. The Company has filed an appeal now pending before the Hawaii Supreme Court.
Other adverse rulings include a decision in September 2012, in which the Superior Court in the District of Columbia granted summary judgment in favor of the District and against the OTCs ruling that tax is due on the OTCs' margin and service fees, which the Company is appealing. As a result, the Company increased its accrual for travel transaction taxes (including estimated interest), with a corresponding charge to cost of revenues, by approximately $4.8 million in September 2012 and by approximately $5.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2013. Also, in July 2013, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, ruled that the Company and the other OTCs are liable for tax and other obligations under the Chicago Hotel Accommodations Tax. In July 2014, the Company resolved all claims in this case through settlement and the claims against the Company were dismissed on September 3, 2014. In addition, in October 2009, a jury in a San Antonio class action found that the Company and the other OTCs that are defendants in the lawsuit "control" hotels for purposes of the local hotel occupancy tax ordinances at issue and are, therefore, subject to the requirements of those ordinances. The Company intends to vigorously appeal the trial court's judgment when it becomes final.
An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending litigation may encourage the commencement of additional litigation, audit proceedings or other regulatory inquiries and also could result in substantial liabilities for past and/or future bookings, including, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorney fees and costs. There have been, and will continue to be, substantial ongoing costs, which may include "pay first" payments, associated with defending the Company's position in pending and any future cases or proceedings. An adverse outcome in one or more of these unresolved proceedings could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and could be material to the Company's results of operations or cash flow in any given operating period. However, the Company believes that even if it were to suffer adverse determinations in the near term in more of the pending proceedings than currently anticipated, given results to date it would not have a material impact on the Company's liquidity because of the Company's available cash.
To the extent that any tax authority succeeds in asserting that the Company's services are subject to travel transaction taxes and that the Company has a tax collection responsibility for those taxes, or the Company determines that it has such a responsibility, with respect to future transactions the Company may collect any such additional tax obligation from its customers, which would have the effect of increasing the cost of travel reservations to its customers and, consequently, could make the Company's travel reservation services less competitive (as compared to the services of other OTCs or travel service providers) and reduce the Company's travel reservation transactions; alternatively, the Company could choose to reduce the compensation for its services. Either action could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results of operations.
In many of the judicial and other proceedings initiated to date, the taxing jurisdictions seek not only historical taxes that are claimed to be owed on the Company's gross profit, but also, among other things, interest, penalties, punitive damages and/or attorney fees and costs. Therefore, any liability associated with travel transaction tax matters is not constrained to the Company's liability for tax owed on its historical gross profit, but may also include, among other things, penalties, interest and attorneys' fees. To date, the majority of the taxing jurisdictions in which the Company facilitates hotel reservations have not
asserted that these taxes are due and payable. With respect to taxing jurisdictions that have not initiated proceedings to date, it is possible that they will do so in the future or that they will seek to amend their tax statutes and seek to collect taxes from the Company only on a prospective basis.
Accrual for Travel Transaction Taxes
As a result of this litigation and other attempts by jurisdictions to levy similar taxes, the Company has established an accrual (including estimated interest and penalties) for the potential resolution of issues related to travel transaction taxes in the amount of approximately $52 million at December 31, 2014 compared to approximately $55 million at December 31, 2013. The Company's legal expenses for these matters are expensed as incurred and are not reflected in the amount accrued. The actual cost may be less or greater, potentially significantly, than the liabilities recorded. An estimate for a reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued cannot be reasonably made.
The Company intends to vigorously defend against the claims in all of the proceedings described below.
Statewide Class Actions and Putative Class Actions
Such actions include:
City of Los Angeles, California v. Hotels.com, Inc., et al. (California Superior Court, Los Angeles County; filed in December 2004); (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in March 2014);
City of San Antonio, Texas v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al. (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas; filed in May 2006);
Pine Bluff Advertising and Promotion Commission, Jefferson County, Arkansas, et al. v. Hotels.com, LP, et al. (Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Arkansas; filed in September 2009); (Arkansas Supreme Court; appeal filed in March 2013);
County of Lawrence, Pennsylvania v. Hotels.com, L.P., et al. (Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County, Pennsylvania; filed Nov. 2009); (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania; appeal filed in November 2010);
City of Columbia, South Carolina, et al. v. Hotelguides.com, Inc. et al. (Court of Common Pleas, Ninth Judicial Circuit, County of Charleston; filed in July 2013); and
City of Charleston, et al. v. Hotelguides.com, Inc. et al. (Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South Carolina; filed January 2014).
Actions Filed on Behalf of Individual Cities, Counties and States
Such actions include:
City of San Diego, California v. Hotels.com L.P., et al. (California Superior Court, San Diego County; filed in September 2006) (Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County) (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in August 2012); (California Supreme Court; petition for review granted in July 2014);
City of Atlanta, Georgia v. Hotels.com L.P., et al. (Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia; filed in March 2006); (Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia; appeal filed in January 2007); (Georgia Supreme Court; further appeal filed in December 2007; petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition filed in December 2012; further appeal filed in November 2013 but transferred to Georgia Court of Appeals in July 2014);
Leon County, et al. v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Second Judicial Circuit Court for Leon County, Florida; filed November 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; appeal filed in May 2012); (Florida Supreme Court; jurisdiction accepted in September 2013);
Leon County v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (Second Judicial Circuit Court for Leon County, Florida; filed in December 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; appeal filed in October 2012); (Florida Supreme Court; notice to invoke jurisdiction filed in October 2013);
Montana Department of Revenue v. Priceline.com, Inc., et al. (First Judicial District Court of Lewis and Clark County, Montana; filed in November 2010); (Montana Supreme Court; appeal filed in May 2014);
District of Columbia v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Superior Court of District of Columbia; filed in March 2011); (District of Columbia Court of Appeals; appeal filed in March 2014);
Volusia County, et al. v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Circuit Court for Volusia County, Florida; filed in April 2011);
Town of Breckenridge, Colorado v. Colorado Travel Company, LLC, et al. (District Court for Summit County, Colorado; filed in July 2011);
County of Nassau v. Expedia, Inc., et al. (Supreme Court of Nassau County, New York; filed in September 2011); (Appellate Division, Second Department; appeal filed in April 2013);
State of Mississippi v. Priceline.com Inc., et al., (Chancery Court of Hinds County, Mississippi; filed in January 2012);
Fargo v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (District Court for the County of Cass; filed in February 2013)
Village of Bedford Park, et al. v. Expedia, Inc. et al. (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; filed in July 2013);
Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Expedia Inc., et al. (Franklin Circuit Court, Kentucky; filed in July 2013);
State of New Hampshire v. priceline.com Inc., et al. (Merrimack Superior Court; filed in October 2013);
Puerto Rico Tourism Company v. Priceline.com Incorporated, et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico; filed in April 2014); and
City of Phoenix, et al. v. Priceline.com Inc., et al. (Arizona Tax Court; filed in August 2014).
Judicial Actions Relating to Assessments Issued by Individual Cities, Counties and States
The Company may seek judicial review of assessments issued by an individual city or county. Currently pending actions seeking such a review include:
Priceline.com, Inc., et al. v. Broward County, Florida (Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County, Florida; filed in January 2009); (Florida First District Court of Appeal; filed in February 2013); (Florida Supreme Court; notice to invoke jurisdiction filed in February 2014);
Priceline.com, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (Indiana Tax Court; filed in March 2009);
Priceline.com, Inc., et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. (California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles; filed in June 2009); (California Court of Appeal; appeal filed in December 2013); Priceline.com, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. (California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles; filed in November 2013);
Priceline.com, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, Florida, et al. (Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court for Miami-Dade, County, Florida; filed in December 2009);
priceline.com Incorporated, et al. v. Osceola County, Florida, et al. (Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County, Florida; filed in January 2011);
In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in March 2011) (Hawaii Supreme Court; appeal transferred in December 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii, filed in July 2012) (Hawaii Supreme Court; appeal transferred in December 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii, filed in June 2013); In the Matter of the Tax Appeal of priceline.com Inc. and In the Matter of Tax Appeal of Travelweb LLC (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in January 2014); In the Matter of the Appeal of priceline.com Incorporated (Tax Appeal Court of the State of Hawaii; filed in August 2014);
Expedia, Inc. et al. v. City of Portland (Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Oregon, filed in February 2012);
Expedia, Inc., et al. v. City and County of Denver, et al. (District Court for Denver County, Colorado, filed in March 2012); (Colorado Court of Appeal; appeal filed in April 2013); (Colorado Supreme Court; petition for review filed in August 2014); and
Expedia, Inc., et al. v. Oregon Department of Revenue (Oregon Tax Court; filed in September 2013).
Administrative Proceedings and Other Possible Actions
At various times, the Company has also received inquiries or proposed tax assessments from municipalities and other taxing jurisdictions relating to the Company's charges and remittance of amounts to cover state and local travel transaction taxes. Among others, the City of Paradise Valley, Arizona; fifteen cities (and one county) in Colorado; Arlington, Texas; Lake County, Indiana; and state tax officials from Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin have begun formal or informal administrative procedures or stated that they may assert claims against the Company relating to allegedly unpaid state or local travel transaction taxes. Between 2008 and 2010, the Company received audit notices from more than forty cities in the state of California. The audit proceedings in those cities have not been active but have not been formally closed. The Company has also been contacted for audit by five counties in the state of Utah.
Patent Infringement
On February 9, 2015, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against The Priceline Group Inc. and its subsidiaries KAYAK Software Corporation, OpenTable, Inc. and priceline.com LLC (the "Subject Companies"). In the complaint, IBM alleges that the Subject Companies have infringed and continue to willfully infringe certain IBM patents that IBM claims relate to the presentation of applications and advertising in an interactive service, preserving state information in online transactions and single sign-on processes in a computing environment and seeks unspecified damages (including a request that the amount of compensatory damages be trebled), injunctive relief and costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The Company believes the claims to be without merit and intends to contest them vigorously.
Other
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the claims in all of the proceedings described in this Note 16. The Company has accrued for certain legal contingencies where it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Except as disclosed, such amounts accrued are not material to the Company's consolidated balance sheets and provisions recorded have not been material to the Company's consolidated results of operations or cash flows. The Company is unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss.
From time to time, the Company has been, and expects to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of third party intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources, divert management's attention from the Company's business objectives and adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Contingent Consideration for Business Acquisitions (see Note 20)
Employment Contracts
The Company has employment agreements with certain members of senior management that provide for cash severance payments of up to approximately $26 million, accelerated vesting of equity instruments, including without limitation, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share units upon, among other things, death or termination without "cause" or "good reason," as those terms are defined in the agreements, and a gross-up for the payment of "golden parachute" excise taxes. In addition, certain of the agreements provide for the extension of health and insurance benefits after termination for periods up to three years.
Operating Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment through operating leases. Rental expense for leased office space was approximately $57.2 million, $40.0 million and $30.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Rental expense for leased facility space was approximately $15 million, $13 million and $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Company's headquarters and the headquarters of the priceline.com business are located in Norwalk, Connecticut, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 70,000 square feet of office space. The Booking.com business is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, where the Company leases approximately 202,000 square feet of office space; the KAYAK business is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 18,000 square feet of office space; the agoda.com business has significant support operations in Bangkok, Thailand, where the Company leases approximately 118,000 square feet of office space; the OpenTable business is headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States of America, where the Company leases approximately 51,000 square feet of office space; and the rentalcars.com business is headquartered in Manchester, England, where the Company leases approximately 63,000 square feet of office space. The Company leases additional office space to support its operations in various locations around the world, including hosting and data center facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Hong Kong and sales and support facilities in numerous locations.
The Company does not own any real estate as of December 31, 2014. Minimum payments for operating leases for office space, data centers and equipment having initial or remaining non-cancellable terms in excess of one year have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the December 31, 2014 spot exchange rates, as applicable, and are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | After 2019 | | Total |
| $79,902 | | $73,853 | | $59,583 | | $50,239 | | $42,918 | | $130,891 | | $437,386 |
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the "Plan") covering certain U.S. employees. In connection with acquisitions, effective as of the date of such acquisitions, the Company assumed defined contribution plans covering the U.S. employees of the acquired companies. The Company also maintains certain other defined contribution plans outside of the United States for which it provides contributions for participating employees. The Company's matching contributions during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $6.2 million, $5.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively.
| |
18. | GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION |
The Company's international information consists of the results of Booking.com, agoda.com and rentalcars.com and the results of the internationally based websites of KAYAK since May 21, 2013 and OpenTable since July 24, 2014 (in each case regardless of where the consumer resides, where the consumer is physically located while making a reservation or the location of the travel service provider or restaurant). The Company's geographic information is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | The Netherlands | | Other | | Total Company |
| 2014 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,798,484 |
| | $ | 5,519,207 |
| | $ | 1,124,280 |
| | $ | 8,441,971 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 2,183,957 |
| | 108,650 |
| | 42,154 |
| | 2,334,761 |
|
| Goodwill | 2,712,479 |
| | 224,731 |
| | 389,264 |
| | 3,326,474 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 80,668 |
| | 97,056 |
| | 77,915 |
| | 255,639 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,769,696 |
| | $ | 4,103,393 |
| | $ | 920,217 |
| | $ | 6,793,306 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 838,494 |
| | 123,847 |
| | 57,644 |
| | 1,019,985 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,247,686 |
| | 156,261 |
| | 363,965 |
| | 1,767,912 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 49,750 |
| | 61,164 |
| | 64,708 |
| | 175,622 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| 2012 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Revenues | $ | 1,661,710 |
| | $ | 2,675,976 |
| | $ | 923,270 |
| | $ | 5,260,956 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 1,337 |
| | 137,255 |
| | 69,521 |
| | 208,113 |
|
| Goodwill | 37,306 |
| | 149,464 |
| | 335,902 |
| | 522,672 |
|
| Other long-lived assets | 76,623 |
| | 37,035 |
| | 42,924 |
| | 156,582 |
|
19. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Total revenues(1) | $ | 1,641,802 |
| | $ | 2,123,575 |
| | $ | 2,836,497 |
| | $ | 1,840,097 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross profit | 1,406,471 |
| | 1,882,996 |
| | 2,619,978 |
| | 1,674,685 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 331,218 |
| | 576,451 |
| | 1,062,253 |
| | 451,831 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | 331,218 |
| | 576,451 |
| | 1,062,253 |
| | 451,831 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | $ | 6.35 |
| | $ | 11.00 |
| | $ | 20.27 |
| | $ | 8.65 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 6.25 |
| | $ | 10.89 |
| | $ | 20.03 |
| | $ | 8.56 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter |
| | (In thousands, except per share data) |
| | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
Total revenues(1) | $ | 1,302,012 |
| | $ | 1,680,238 |
| | $ | 2,269,903 |
| | $ | 1,541,153 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Gross profit | 1,009,665 |
| | 1,383,855 |
| | 1,989,065 |
| | 1,333,301 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income | 244,292 |
| | 437,440 |
| | 832,989 |
| | 378,077 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders | 244,271 |
| | 437,326 |
| | 832,989 |
| | 378,077 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per basic common share | $ | 4.89 |
| | $ | 8.62 |
| | $ | 16.22 |
| | $ | 7.32 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income applicable to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 4.76 |
| | $ | 8.39 |
| | $ | 15.72 |
| | $ | 7.14 |
|
_____________________________
(1)As the Company's retail accommodation business, which recognizes revenue at the completion of the stay, continues to expand, our quarterly results become increasingly impacted by seasonal factors.
20. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition activity in 2014
OpenTable, Inc.
On July 24, 2014, the Company acquired OpenTable, Inc., a leading online restaurant reservation business, in a cash transaction. The purchase price of OpenTable was approximately $2.5 billion (approximately $2.4 billion net of cash acquired) or $103.00 per share of OpenTable common stock. The Company funded the acquisition from cash on hand in the United States and $995 million borrowed under the Company's revolving credit facility, which the Company repaid during the third quarter of 2014 (see Note 11 for a description of the credit facility). Also, in connection with this acquisition, the Company assumed unvested employee stock options and restricted stock units with an acquisition fair value of approximately $95 million (see Note 3).
OpenTable has built a strong brand helping diners secure restaurant reservations online at over 32,000 restaurants across the United States and select non-U.S. markets. OpenTable also helps restaurants manage their reservations and connect directly with their customers. The Company believes that OpenTable has significant global potential and intends to leverage its international experience and capabilities in support of OpenTable's international growth.
The purchase price allocations were completed as of December 31, 2014. The aggregate purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | |
Current assets (1) | | $ | 203 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets (2) | | 1,435 |
|
Goodwill (3) | | 1,500 |
|
| Other long-term assets | | 38 |
|
Total liabilities (4) | | (647 | ) |
| Total consideration | | $ | 2,529 |
|
(1) Includes cash acquired of $126 million.
(2) Acquired definite-lived intangibles, with a weighted average life of 18.8 years, consisted of trade names of $1.1 billion with an estimated useful life of 20 years, supply and distribution agreements of $290 million with an estimated useful life of 15 years, and technology of $15 million with estimated useful life of 5 years.
(3) Goodwill is not tax deductible.
(4) Includes deferred tax liabilities of $543 million.
The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OpenTable starting on July 24, 2014. OpenTable's revenues and earnings since the acquisition date and pro forma results of operations have not been presented separately as such financial information is not material to the Company's results of operations.
Other
In the second quarter of 2014, the Company acquired certain businesses that provide hotel marketing services. The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these businesses starting at their respective acquisition dates. The Company paid approximately $98 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase these businesses. As of December 31, 2014, the Company recognized a liability of approximately $10.7 million for estimated contingent payments related to these acquisitions. The estimated contingent payments are based upon probability weighted average payments for specific performance factors from the acquisition dates through December 31, 2018. The range of undiscounted outcomes for the estimated contingent payments is approximately $0 to $71 million.
The Company incurred $6.9 million of professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2014 related to these consummated acquisitions. These acquisition-related expenses were included in "General and administrative" expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Acquisition activity in 2013
KAYAK Software Corporation
On May 21, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of KAYAK Software Corporation in a stock and cash transaction. The purchase value was $2.1 billion ($1.9 billion net of cash acquired). The Company paid $0.5 billion in cash, from cash on hand in the United States, and $1.6 billion in shares of its common stock (based upon the market value of the Company's common stock at the merger date) and the fair value of the assumed vested KAYAK stock options. These assumed vested KAYAK stock options are related to pre-combination service. A significant amount of the aggregate purchase price was allocated to definite-lived intangibles and goodwill.
Also in conjunction with the acquisition, the Company assumed unvested KAYAK employee stock options, which relate to post-combination service, with an acquisition date fair value of $57.4 million (see Note 3).
As a result of the acquisition of KAYAK, the Company expensed approximately $8.5 million of professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2013. These acquisition-related expenses were included in "General and administrative" expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company paid approximately $1.2 million of stock issuance costs for the year ended December 31, 2013, with an offsetting charge to additional paid-in capital.
The Company's consolidated financial statements include the accounts of KAYAK starting on May 21, 2013. KAYAK's revenues and earnings since the acquisition date and pro forma results of operations have not been presented as such financial information is not material to the Company's results of operations.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. Some agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
should not be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
| |
• | may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which-disclosuresarenot necessarily reflected in the agreement;
|
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10‑K and the Company's other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.
|
| |
Exhibit Number | Description |
2.1(a) | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 8, 2012, by and among KAYAK Software Corporation, the Registrant and Produce Merger Sub, Inc. |
2.2(b) | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 12, 2014, by and among OpenTable, Inc., the Registrant and Rhombus, Inc. |
3.1(c) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. |
3.2(d) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant. |
4.1 | Reference is hereby made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2. |
4.2(e) | Specimen Certificate for Registrant's Common Stock. |
4.3(f) | Indenture, dated as of March 10, 2010, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.4(g) | Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2012, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.5(h) | Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2013, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.6(i) | Indenture, dated as of August 20, 2014, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC as Trustee. |
4.7(j) | Form of Indenture for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024, between the Registrant and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee. |
4.8(k) | Form of 2.375% Senior Note due 2024. |
4.9(l) | Officers' Certificate, dated September 23, 2014, for the 2.375% Senior Notes due 2024. |
10.1(m)+ | The Priceline Group Inc. 1999 Omnibus Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective June 6, 2013). |
10.2(n)+ | Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.3(o)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Employees in the Netherlands under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.4(p)+ | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for awards under the 1999 Omnibus Plan to non-employee directors. |
10.5(q)+ | 2012 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.6(r)+ | 2013 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.7(s)+ | 2014 Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement under the 1999 Omnibus Plan. |
10.8+ | Amended and Restated KAYAK Software Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. |
10.9(t)+ | OpenTable, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Award Plan. |
10.10(u)+ | Buuteeq, Inc. Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Plan. |
|
| |
10.11(v)+ | The Priceline Group Inc. Annual Bonus Plan, adopted on February 20, 2007. |
10.12(r)+ | Form of Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement. |
10.13(w)+ | Transition Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Jeffery H. Boyd. |
10.14(w)+ | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant, Booking.com Holding B.V. and Darren R. Huston. |
10.15(w)+ | Amended and Restated Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement dated November 7, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
10.16(x)+ | Indemnification Agreement, dated September 12, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Darren R. Huston. |
10.17(y)+ | Letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
10.18(z)+ | Letter amendment, dated December 16, 2008, to letter agreement, dated October 19, 2005 by and between the Registrant and Daniel J. Finnegan. |
10.19(z)+ | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 18, 2008, by and between the Registrant and Peter J. Millones. |
10.20(z)+ | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 18, 2008, by and between the Registrant and Chris Soder. |
10.21(x) | Credit Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2011, among the Registrant, the lenders from time to time party thereto, RBS Citizens, N.A., as Documentation Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co‑Syndication Agents and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. |
10.22(h) | Purchase Agreement, dated May 29, 2013, between the Registrant and Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
10.23(i) | Purchase Agreement, dated August 14, 2014, between The Priceline Group Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as the Initial Purchasers. |
10.24(k) | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 16, 2014, among the Registrant, Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Limited and Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
12.1 | Statement of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
21 | List of Subsidiaries. |
23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (included in the Signature Page). |
31.1 | Certification of Darren R. Huston, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1(aa) | Certification of Darren R. Huston, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
32.2(aa) | Certification of Daniel J. Finnegan, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code). |
101 | The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2014 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
____________________________
| |
| + | Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
| |
| | |
| (a) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K8-K filed on November 9, 2012July 18, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (b) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 13, 2014November 9, 2015 (File No. 0-25581)1-36691). |
| (c) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2014 (file No. 0-25581). |
(d) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(e) | Previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-69657) filed on March 18, 1999. |
(f) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 20101999 (File No. 0-25581)333-69657). |
(g)(d) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2012 (File No. 0-25581). |
(h)(e) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(i)(f) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(j)(g) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the post-effective amendmentCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on September 8, 2014 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 2, 2014November 25, 2015 (File No. 333-198515)1-36691). |
(k)(h) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 22, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(l)(i) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
| (j) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (k) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (l) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (m) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (n) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 23, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (o) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on June 6, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(n) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-122414) filed on January 31, 2005. |
(o)(p) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 8, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
(p)(q) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
(q)(r) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 20127, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(r)(s) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 6, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (t) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (u) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2014 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (v) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (w) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 13, 2014 (File No. 333-196756). |
| (x) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (y) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(s) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 7, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(t) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 0-25581). |
(u) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 13, 2014 (File No. 333-196756). |
(v) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on February 23, 2007 (File No. 0-25581). |
(w)(z) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2013 (File No. 0-25581). |
(x)(aa) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 0-25581). |
(y)(bb) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2005 (File No. 0-25581). |
(z)(cc) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-25581). |
(aa)(dd) | Previously filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ee) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ff) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (gg) | Previously filed as an exhibit to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2016 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (hh) | Previously filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2015 (File No. 1-36691). |
| (ii) | This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33‑8212 and 34‑47551. |
