UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
| | |
| (Mark One) |
| x | | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | | For the fiscal year ended October 31, 20122015 |
| or |
| o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | | For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 001-15405
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
| | |
| Delaware | | 77-0518772 |
State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization | | I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
Address of principal executive offices: 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95051
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 345-8886
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| | |
| Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock par value $0.01 per share | | New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨¬
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨¬ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨¬
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨¬
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. |
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer ¨¬ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨¬ | | Smaller reporting company ¨¬ |
| | | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨¬ No x
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common equity held by non-affiliates as of April 30, 2012,2015, was approximately $13.621$9.6 billion. Shares of stock held by officers, directors and 5 percent or more stockholders have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of December 1, 2012,2015, there were 347,934,544332,170,890 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE |
| | |
| Document Description | | 10-K Part |
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") to be held on March 20, 2013,16, 2016, and to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after registrant's fiscal year ended October 31, 20122015 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report | | III |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward‑lookingforward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements regarding trends, seasonality cyclicality and growth in, and drivers of, the markets we sell into, our strategic direction, our future effective tax rate and tax valuation allowance, earnings from our foreign subsidiaries, lease and site service income from Keysight, the impact of foreign currency movements on our performance, remediation activities, indemnification, new product and service introductions, the ability of our products to meet market needs, adoption of our products, changes to our manufacturing processes, the use of contract manufacturers and out sourcing, source and supply of materials used in our products, the impact of local government regulations on our ability to pay vendors or conduct operations, our liquidity position, our ability to generate cash from operations, growth in our businesses, our investments, the potential impact of adopting new accounting pronouncements, our financial results, our operating margin, our sales, our purchase commitments, our capital expenditures, our contributions to our pension plans, the selection of discount rates and recognition of any gains or losses for our benefit plans,strategic initiatives, our cost-control activities, compliance withtiming of completion of our restructuring programs, timing of savings and headcount reduction recognized from our restructuring programs and other cost saving initiatives, continuation of service support to the rules and regulations of the U.S.NMR installed base, uncertainties relating to Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”("FDA") and other regulatory agencies,approvals, the integration of our Dako acquisitionacquisitions and other transactions, impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, remediation of our material weakness, our stock repurchase program, our declared dividends, our transition to lower-cost regions, and the existence of economic instability, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward‑ lookingforward-looking statements due to various factors, including those discussed in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Agilent Technologies Inc. (“we”("we", “Agilent”"Agilent" or the “company”"company"), incorporated in Delaware in May 1999, is the world's premier measurement company providing core bio-analytical and electronic measurement solutions to thea global leader in life sciences, diagnostics and applied chemical markets, providing application focused solutions that includes instruments, software, services and consumables for the entire laboratory workflow.
On November 1, 2014, we completed the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Keysight Technologies, Inc. ("Keysight") to Agilent stockholders who received one share of Keysight common stock for every two shares of Agilent held as of the close of business on the record date, October 22, 2014. The historical results of operations and the financial position of Keysight are included in the consolidated financial statements of Agilent and are reported as discontinued operations within this Form 10-K.
In November 2014, we announced a change in organizational structure designed to better serve our customers. Our life sciences business, excluding the nucleic acid solutions division, together with the chemical analysis business combined to form a new segment called life sciences and applied markets business. Our diagnostics and genomics communicationsbusinesses combined with the nucleic acid solutions division from our life sciences business and electronics industries.
Inbecame the third fiscal quarter of 2012, we formed a new operating segment. The new diagnostics and genomics segment. Finally, the Agilent CrossLab segment was formed from a portion of our pre-existing life sciences business plus the business of our recent acquisition of Dako A/S ("Dako"). Following this reorganization, Agilent has four business segments comprisedservices and consumables businesses previously part of the life sciences business, theand chemical analysis business, the diagnosticsbusinesses. Financial reporting under this new structure is included within this report on Form 10-K and genomics business and the electronic measurement business. The historical financial segment financial information for both the life sciences and diagnostics and genomics segments havehas been recast to conform to this new reporting structure inpresentation within our financial statements.
Our life sciences and applied markets business focuses onprovides application-focused solutions that include instruments and software that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the pharmaceutical, biotech, academicphysical and government, bio-agriculturebiological properties of substances and food safety industries. Our chemical analysis business focuses onproducts, as well as enable customers in the petrochemical, environmental, forensicsclinical and food safety industries.life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the molecular level. Our diagnostics and genomics business focuses onis comprised of three areas of activity providing solutions that include reagents, instruments, software and consumables, which enable customers in the clinical markets, academic and government, pharmaceutical, biotechnologylife sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the cellular and contract research organization industries. Our electronic measurementmolecular level. The Agilent CrossLab business addressesspans the communications, electronicsentire lab with its extensive consumables and other industries.services portfolio, which is designed to improve customer outcomes. In addition to our four businesses, we conduct centralized manufacturing and order fulfillment and supply chain operations for our businesses through Agilent Order Fulfillment ("AOF") as well as research through Agilent Technologies Laboratoriesthe order fulfillment and supply chain organization (“Agilent Labs”OFS”). OFS provides resources for manufacturing, engineering and strategic sourcing to our respective businesses. Each of our four businesses, AOF and Agilent Labs,together with OFS, is supported by our global infrastructure organization, which provides shared services in the areas of finance, information technology, legal, workplace services and human resources.
On June 21, 2012, we acquired Dako through the purchase of 100% of the share capital of Dako, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Denmark, under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. Dako provides antibodies, reagents, scientific instruments and software primarily to customers in pathology laboratories. As a result of the acquisition, Dako has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. The consideration paid was approximately $2.143 billion, of which $1.4 billion was paid directly to the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy the outstanding debt of Dako. Agilent funded the acquisition using our existing cash.
On May 14, 2010, we acquired Varian, Inc., a leading supplier of scientific instrumentation and associated consumables for life science and applied market applications, for a total cash purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion. Varian's products include analytical instruments, research products and related software, consumable products, accessories and services, as well as vacuum products and related services and accessories. The acquisition broadens Agilent's applications and solutions offerings in both of our chemical analysis and life sciences businesses. It expands Agilent's product portfolio into atomic and molecular spectroscopy; establishes a strong position in nuclear magnetic resonance, imaging and vacuum technologies; and strengthens our consumables portfolio. We financed the purchase price of Varian using the proceeds from our September 2009 offering of senior notes and other existing cash. Varian's cash acquired at completion of the acquisition was approximately $226 million.
On May 1, 2010, we completed the sale of our Network Solutions Division ("NSD") of our electronic measurement business to JDS Uniphase Corporation. NSD included Agilent's network assurance solutions, network protocol test and drive test products. On February 2, 2010, the company sold Hycor Biomedical Inc., a subsidiary of Agilent and part of our life sciences business, to Linden LLC, a Chicago-based healthcare private equity firm. Hycor is a global manufacturer and marketer of in-vitro diagnostics products.
We sell our products primarily through direct sales, but we also utilize distributors, resellers, manufacturer's representatives telesales and electronic commerce. Of our total net revenue of $6.9$4.0 billion for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012,2015, we generated 3230 percent in the U.S. and 6870 percent outside the U.S. As of October 31, 2012,2015, we employed approximately 20,50011,800 people worldwide. Our
primary research and development and manufacturing sites are in California, Colorado, Delaware and DelawareTexas in the U.S. and in Australia, China, Denmark, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Poland, Singapore and the United Kingdom.
The net revenue, income from operations and assets by business segment, as of and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 20122015 and for each of the past three years are shown in Note 21,22, "Segment Information", to our consolidated financial statements, which we incorporate by reference herein.
Life Sciences and Applied Markets Business
Our life sciences and applied markets business provides application‑focusedapplication-focused solutions that include instruments software, consumables, and servicessoftware that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products.products, as well as enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the molecular level. Key product categories in life sciences include: liquid chromatography (“LC”("LC") systems columns and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (“LCMS”("LCMS") systems; gas chromatography ("GC") systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry ("GCMS") systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ("ICP-MS") instruments; atomic absorption ("AA") instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (“MP-AES”) instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry ("ICP-OES") instruments; laboratory software and informatics systems; laboratory automation and robotic systems; dissolution testing; nucleic acid solutions; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (“NMR”); Magnetic Resonance Imaging (“MRI”);vacuum pumps and X-Ray Diffraction (“XRD”) systems; and services and support for the aforementioned products.measurement technologies.
We employed approximately 4,0004,200 people as of October 31, 20122015 in our life sciences and applied markets business. This business generated revenue of $1.6$2.0 billion in fiscal 2012, $1.52015, $2.1 billion in fiscal 20112014 and $1.2$2.0 billion in fiscal 2010.2013.
Life ScienceSciences and Applied Markets
Our life sciences and applied markets business focuses primarily on the following twofive markets:
The Pharma, Biotech,Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, CRO & CMO Market. This market consists of “for-profit” companies who participate across the pharmaceutical value chain in the areas of therapeutic research, discovery & development, clinical trials, manufacturing and quality assurance and quality control. One sub-segment of this market is core and emerging pharmaceutical companies (“Pharma”pharma”). A second sub-segment includes biotechnology companies (“biotech”), contract research organizations (“CROs”) and contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”). Biotech companies and, to a somewhat lesser extent, CROs and CMOs typically participate in specific points in the Pharmapharmaceutical industry value chain. Additionally, due to the relatively low drug efficacy within oncology, pharma companies are partnering with diagnostic companies to bring validated tests to the market with their new drugs.
The Academic and GovernmentLife Science Research Market. This market consists primarily of “not-for-profit” organizations and includes academic institutions, large government institutes and privately funded organizations. The academic and governmentlife science research market plays an influential role in technology adoption and therapeutic developments for Pharmapharmaceutical and molecular diagnostics companies. After decades of investment in basic biomedical research by government funding bodies, the focus has widened to include translational research - multidisciplinary scientific efforts directed at “acceleratingaccelerating therapy development”.development.
The Chemical & Energy Market. The natural gas and petroleum refining markets use our products to measure and control the quality of their finished products and to verify the environmental safety of their operations. Petroleum refiners use our measurement solutions to analyze crude oil composition, perform raw material analysis, verify and improve refining processes and ensure the overall quality of gasoline, fuels, lubricants and other products. Our solutions are also used in the development, manufacturing and quality control of fine chemicals.
The Environmental & Forensics Market. Our instruments, software and workflow solutions are used by the environmental market for applications such as laboratory and field analysis of chemical pollutants in air, water, soil and solid waste. Environmental industry customers include all levels of government, the industrial and manufacturing sectors, engineering and consulting companies, commercial testing laboratories and colleges and universities. Drug testing and forensics laboratories use our instruments, software and workflow solutions for applications such as analyzing evidence associated with crime, screening athletes for performance enhancing drugs, analyzing samples for recreational drugs, or detecting and identifying biological and chemical warfare agents. This instrumentation is used in either static or mobile laboratories. Customers include local, state, federal, and international law enforcement agencies and health laboratories.
The Food Market. Our instruments, software, and workflow solutions are used throughout the food production chain, including incoming inspection, new product development, quality control and assurance, and packaging. For example, our mass spectrometer portfolio is used to analyze contaminants and residual pesticides in food. There is also a significant food safety market involved in analyzing food for pathogen contamination, accurate verification of species type and evidence of genetically modified content.
Life Science MeasurementSciences and Applied Markets Products and Applications
A key factor in allOur products fall into nine main areas of our life science measurement target markets is the need for new products that increase customer productivitywork: liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, software and provide high quality data that enable decision‑making by our customers. informatics, lab automation and robotics, automated electrophoresis and microfluidics, vacuum technology and nuclear magnetic resonance systems.
Our key product segments include:and applications include the following technologies:
Liquid Chromatography Products
A liquid chromatograph (“LC”) or a high performance liquid chromatograph (“HPLC”) is used to separate molecules of a liquid mixture to determine the quantity and identity of the molecules present. The Agilent LC portfolio is modular in construction and can be configured as analytical and preparative systems. These systems can be stepwise upgraded to highly sophisticated, automated workflow solutions such as method development, multi‑method/walk-up, high-capacity/high-throughput or multi‑dimensional LC and can be extended to application‑based analyzers e.g. for bio-molecular separations, chiral analysis or size exclusion chromatography. As a leader in liquid chromatography, we continue to expand our application space with new HPLC columns, new services and diagnostics offerings and ongoing instrument and software product enhancements.
Gas Chromatography
TableAgilent is the world's leading provider of Contentsgas chromatographs, both laboratory and portable models. A gas chromatograph ("GC") is used to separate any gas, liquid or solid that can be vaporized and then detect the molecules present to determine their identity and quantity. Agilent provides custom or standard analyzers configured for specific chemical analysis applications, such as detailed speciation of a complex hydrocarbon stream, calculation of gas calorific values in the field, or analysis of a new bio-fuel formulation. We also offer related software, accessories and consumable products for these and other similar instruments.
Mass Spectrometry Products
A mass spectrometer (“MS”) identifies and quantifies chemicals based on a chemical's molecular mass and characteristic patterns of fragment ion masses that result when a molecule is broken apart. Liquid chromatography (“LC”) is commonly used to separate compounds and introduce them to the MS system. The combined use of LC and MS (“LCMS”) is frequently used both to identify and quantify chemical compounds. Mass spectrometry is an important tool in analyzing small molecules and can also be used to characterize and quantify proteins and other biological entities. Agilent's LCMS portfolio includes instruments built around four main analyzer types - single quadrupole, triple quadrupole, time-of-flight (“TOF”) and quadrupole time-of-flight (“QTOF”). We significantly expanded our mass spectrometry portfolio in recent years with a focus on improving performance, reliability,sensitivity, and ease of use.
Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy is a technique for analyzing the individual chemical components of substances based on the absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation of specific wavelengths of light. Our spectroscopy instruments include atomic absorption ("AA") spectrometers, microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometers (“MP-AES”), inductively coupled plasma-optical emissions spectrometers ("ICP-OES"), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers ("ICP-MS"), fluorescence spectrophotometers, ultraviolet- visible ("UV-Vis") spectrophotometers, Fourier Transform infrared ("FT-IR") spectrophotometers, near-infrared ("NIR") spectrophotometers, Raman spectrometers and sample automation products. We also offer related software, accessories and consumable products for these and other similar instruments.
Software and Informatics Products
We provide software for instrument control, data acquisition, data analysis, laboratory content and business process management, and informatics. Our software facilitates the regulatory‑compliant use of instruments in pharmaceutical quality assurance/
quality control environments. With OpenLab Laboratory Software Suite, Agilent has introduced a scalable, open architecturesoftware platform that enables customers to easily capture, analyze, and share scientific data throughout the lab and across the enterprise.
Lab Automation and Robotics
We offer a comprehensive suite of workflow solutions to our life science customers with the addition of automated liquid handling and robotics that range from standalone instrumentation to bench-top automation solutions to large, multi‑armed robotic systems. These solutions strengthen our offering of automated sample‑sample preparation solutions across a broad range of applications. In fiscal 2012 we acquired AssayMAP technology, which in combination with Agilent's Bravo liquid handling platform enables highly parallel automated microchromatography
Automated Electrophoresis and Microfluidics
Automated electrophoresis is a separation technique for protein purification and characterization.
NMR and MRI systems
With the acquisition of Varian during fiscal 2010, Agilent has enriched its portfolio with NMR, spectrometers, MRI systems and XRD systems used in a variety of industries including academic and not-for-profit research, life sciences (pharma and biotech), and industrial companies. All of these technologies are utilized for basic and applied research, and NMR is also used in process development and manufacturing QA/QC.
Nucleic Acid Solutions
We provide highly specialized contract manufacturing of nucleic acidbio molecules designed for use as active pharmaceutical ingredients (“API”) for pharmaceutical and biotech companies. The API we produce are custom modified versions of human DNA or RNA molecules that serve as the key component in drugs targeted at diseases that involve genetic disorders. We offer proprietary manufacturing process know-how for synthesis and purification of these complex molecules, and capability to support the quantities customers need for use in preclinical studies, clinical trials, and commercial production. We also provide an array of manufacturing related support-services, including development of analytical methods and processes, stability studies, process validation, and regulatory support.
Consumables and Services
We also offer a broad range of consumable products, which support our LC, and MS technology platforms. These consumable products include sample preparation products; self-manufactured LC columns, instrument replacement parts, and consumable supplies to meet our customers' analysis needs. All of our products are designed to Agilent's specifications to improve and maximize the performance of our instruments.
We offer a wide range of startup, operational, educational and compliance support services for our measurement and data handling systems. Our support services include maintenance, troubleshooting, repair and training for all of our chemical and bioinstrumentation analysis hardware and software products. Special service bundles have also been designed to meet the specific application needs of various industries.
Life Sciences Customers
We had over 30,000 customers for our life sciences business in 2012. No single customer represented a material amount of the net revenue of the life sciences business. A significant number of our life sciences customers are also customers of our chemical analysis and diagnostics and genomics businesses.
The life sciences business is susceptible to seasonality in its orders and revenues primarily based on U.S. government and large pharmaceutical company budgets. In general, the result is that our first and fourth fiscal quarters tend to deliver the strongest profits for this group. However, general economic trends, new product introductions and competition might overshadow this trend in any given year.
Life Sciences Sales, Marketing and Support
The life science channel focuses on the therapeutics customer base (Pharma, biotech, CRO, CMO and Generics) and on emerging life sciences opportunities in academic and government life science research institutes. We deploy a multi-channel approach, marketing products to our customers through direct sales, electronic commerce, resellers, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. We use direct sales to market our solutions to all of our pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical accounts. Sales agents supplement direct sales by providing broader geographic coverage and coverage of smaller accounts. Our active reseller program augments our ability to provide more complete solutions to our customers. We sell our consumable products through distributors, telesales, electronic commerce and direct sales.
We deliver our support services to customers in a variety of ways, including on-site assistance with repair or exchange of returned products, telephone support and self-diagnostic services provided over the Internet. We also offer special industry‑focused service bundles that are designed to meet the specific needs of hydrocarbon processing, environmental, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical customers to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements. Our products typically come with standard warranties, and extended warranties are available for additional cost.
Life Sciences Manufacturing
Our manufacturing supports our diverse product range and customer‑centric focus. We assemble highly configurable products to individual customer orders and make standard products to stock. We employ advanced manufacturing techniques and supply chain management systems to reduce costs and manufacturing cycle times. We selectively use third parties to provide some supply chain processes for manufacturing, warehousing and logistics. We have manufacturing facilities in California, Colorado and North Carolina in the U.S. Outside of the U.S., we have manufacturing facilities in Germany, Malaysia, Poland, Singapore and U.K. We utilize just-in-time manufacturing.
Life Sciences Competition
The markets for analytical instruments in which we compete are characterized by evolving industry standards and intense competition. Our principal competitors in the life sciences arena include: Bruker Corp., Danaher Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Waters Corp. Agilent competes on the basis of product performance, reliability, support quality, applications expertise, global channel coverage and price.
Chemical Analysis Business
Our chemical analysis business provides application-focused solutions that include instruments, software, consumables, and services that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products. Key product categories in chemical analysis include: gas chromatography ("GC") systems, columns and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry ("GC-MS") systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ("ICP-MS") instruments; atomic absorption ("AA") instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (“MP-AES”) instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry ("ICP-OES") instruments; software and data systems; vacuum pumps and measurement technologies; services and support for our products.
We employed approximately 4,000 people as of October 31, 2012 in our chemical analysis business. This business generated revenue of $1.6 billion in fiscal 2012, $1.5 billion in fiscal 2011, and $1.2 billion in fiscal 2010.
Chemical Analysis Markets
Within chemical analysis, we focus primarily on the following markets:
The Chemical & Energy Market. The natural gas and petroleum refining markets use our products to measure and control the quality of their finished products and to verify the environmental safety of their operations. Petroleum refiners use our measurement solutions to analyze crude oil composition, perform raw material analysis, verify and improve refining processes and ensure the overall quality of gasoline, fuels, lubricants and other products. Our solutions are also used in the development, manufacturing and quality control of fine chemicals.
The Environmental & Forensics Market. Our instruments, software and workflow solutions are used by the environmental market for applications such as laboratoryproteins, peptides and field analysis of chemical pollutants in air, water, soilnucleic acids (RNA and solid waste. Environmental industry customers include all levels of government, the industrialDNA) and manufacturing sectors, engineering and consulting companies, commercial testing laboratories and colleges and universities. Drug testing and forensics laboratories use our instruments, software and workflow solutions for applications such as analyzing evidence associated with crime, screening athletes for performance enhancing drugs, analyzing samples for recreational drugs, or detecting and identifying biological and chemical warfare agents. This instrumentation is used in either static or mobile laboratories. Customers include local, state, federal, and international law enforcement agencies and health laboratories.
The Food Market. Our instruments, software, and workflow solutions are used throughout the food production chain, including incoming inspection, new product development, quality control and assurance, and packaging. For example, our mass spectrometer portfolio, including triple quad liquid chromatography mass spectrometers, is used to analyze contaminants and residual pesticides in food. There is also a significant food safety market involved in analyzing food for pathogen contamination, accurate verification of species type and evidence of genetically modified content.
Chemical Analysis Products
A key factor in all of our chemical analysis markets isdetermine the need for new products that increase customer productivity and provide high quality data that enable decision-making by our customers. Our key product segments include:
Gas Chromatography Products
Agilent is the world's leading provider of gas chromatographs, both laboratory and portable models. A gas chromatograph ("GC") is used to separate any gas, liquid or solid that can be vaporized and then detect the molecules present to determine their identity and quantity. Agilent provides custom or standard analyzers configured for specific chemical analysis applications, such as detailed speciation of a complex hydrocarbon stream, calculationmolecule by either size or charge. It is widely used as a QC tool to check sample integrity prior to subsequent analysis. Prominent examples are nucleic acid preparation products in front of gas calorific values in the field, or analysis of a new bio-fuel formulation. We also offer related software, accessoriespolymerase chain reaction, NGS and consumable products for these and other similar instruments.
Mass Spectrometry Products
Mass spectrometry ("MS") is a technique for analyzing the individual chemical components of substances by ionizing them and determining their mass-to-charge ratios. Our MS products incorporate various technologies for measuring mass, including single-quadrupole, triple-quadrupole, quadrupole time-of-flight and ion trap mass spectrometers. We combine our mass spectrometers with other instruments to create high-performance instruments such as gas chromatograph mass spectrometers ("GC/MS"), and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers ("ICP-MS"). We also offer related software, accessories and consumable products for these and other similar instruments.
Spectroscopy Products
Spectroscopy is a technique for analyzing the individual chemical components of substances based on the absorption or emission of electromagnetic radiation of specific wavelengths of light. Our spectroscopy instruments include atomic absorption ("AA") spectrometers, microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometers (“MP-AES”), inductively coupled plasma-optical emissions spectrometers ("ICP-OES"), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometers ("ICP-MS"), fluorescence spectrophotometers, ultraviolet- visible ("UV-Vis") spectrophotometers, Fourier Transform infrared ("FT-IR") spectrophotometers, near-infrared ("NIR") spectrophotometers, Raman spectrometers and sample automation products. We also offer related software, accessories and consumable products for these and other similar instruments.
microarrays.
Vacuum Technology Products
Our vacuum technologies products are used to create, control, measure and test vacuum environments in life science, industrial and scientific applications where ultra-clean, high-vacuum environments are needed. Vacuum technologies' customers are typically OEMs that manufacture equipment for these applications. Products include a wide range of high and ultra-high vacuum pumps (diffusion, turbomolecular and ion getter), intermediate vacuum pumps (rotary vane, sorption and dry scroll), vacuum instrumentation (vacuum control instruments, sensor gauges and meters) and vacuum components (valves, flanges and other mechanical hardware). These products also include helium mass spectrometry and helium-sensing leak detection instruments used to identify and measure leaks in hermetic or vacuum environments. In addition to product sales, we also offer a wide range of services including an exchange and rebuild program, assistance with the design and integration of vacuum systems, applications support and training in basic and advanced vacuum technologies.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
7
Consumablesindustries including academic and Servicesnot-for-profit research, life sciences (pharma and biotech), and industrial companies. All of these technologies are utilized for basic and applied research, and NMR is also used in process development and manufacturing QA/QC. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we announced the termination of our involvement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging systems ("MRI"). In the fourth quarter of 2014, we announced the termination of our NMR product line and our decision to cease the manufacture and sale of these items.
We offer a broad range of consumable products, which support our technology platforms, including sample preparation consumables such as solid phase extraction ("SPE")Life Sciences and filtration products, self manufactured GC and LC columns, chemical standards, and instrument replacement parts. Consumable products also include scientific instrument parts and supplies such as filters and fittings for GC systems; xenon lamps and cuvettes for UV-Vis-NIR, fluorescence, FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy instruments; and graphite furnace tubes, hollow cathode lamps and specialized sample introduction glassware for our AA, ICP-OES and ICP-MS products.
We offer a wide range of startup, operational, educational and compliance support services for our measurement and data handling systems. Our support services include maintenance, troubleshooting, repair and training for all of our chemical and bioinstrumentation analysis hardware and software products. Special service bundles have also been designed to meet the specific application needs of various industries.
Chemical AnalysisApplied Markets Customers
We had approximately 35,00023,000 customers for our chemical analysislife sciences and applied markets business in 2012.fiscal 2015. No single customer represented a material amount of the net revenue of the chemical analysislife sciences and applied markets business. A significant number of our chemical analysislife sciences and applied markets customers are also customers of our Agilent CrossLab business.
The life sciences business.
The chemical analysisand applied markets business is susceptible to seasonality in its orders and revenues primarily based on U.S. and foreign government budgets and large pharmaceutical company budgets. TheHistorically, the result is that our first and fourth fiscal quarter tendsquarters tend to deliver the strongest profits for this business.group. However, general economic trends, new product introductions and competition might overshadow this trend in any given year.
Chemical AnalysisLife Sciences and Applied Markets Sales, Marketing and Support
Our salesThe life science and support deliveryapplied markets channels are aligned by key markets.focus on the therapeutics and human disease research customer base (pharma, biotech, CRO, CMO and generics), clinical customer base (high complexity clinical testing labs) and on emerging life sciences opportunities in life science research institutes. We marketdeploy a multi-channel approach, marketing products to our customers through direct sales, electronic commerce, resellers, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. Additionally, we are optimizing our worldwide distribution capabilities to address high-growth opportunities such as the environmental and food safety markets in the Asia-Pacific region.
We primarily use direct sales to market our solutions to our large-pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and medium-sized chemical customers and environmentalclinical accounts. Sales agents supplement direct sales by providing broader geographic coverage and coverage of smaller accounts. Our active reseller program augments our ability to provide more complete solutions to our customers. We sell our consumable products through distributors, telesales, electronic commerce and direct sales.
We deliver our support services to customers in a variety of ways, including on-site assistance with repair or exchange of returned products, telephone support and self-diagnostic services provided over the Internet. We also offer special industry-focused service bundles that are designed to meet the specific needs including those for hydrocarbon processing and environmental customers to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements. Our products typically come with standard warranties, and extended warranties are available for additional cost.
Chemical AnalysisLife Sciences and Applied Markets Manufacturing
Our manufacturing supports our diverse product range and customer-centriccustomer‑centric focus. We assemble highly configurable products to individual customer orders and make standard products to stock. We employ advanced manufacturing techniques and supply chain management systems to reduce costs and manufacturing cycle times. Our manufacturing process then converts these designs into custom products for shipment to customers. We selectively use third parties to provide some supply chain processes for manufacturing, warehousing and logistics. We have manufacturing facilities in California Delaware, Connecticut, and MassachusettsDelaware in the U.S. Outside of the U.S., we have manufacturing facilities in Australia, Canada, China, Italy,Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Japan,Singapore and the United Kingdom.U.K. We have a FDA registered site in California, Germany and Singapore. We utilize just-in-time manufacturingmanufacturing.
Life Sciences and so typically do not maintain a high level of inventory.
Chemical AnalysisApplied Markets Competition
The markets for analytical instruments in which we compete are characterized by evolving industry standards and intense competition. Our principal competitors in the chemical analysislife sciences and applied markets arena include: BrukerDanaher Corporation, PerkinElmer Inc., Shimadzu Corporation and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waters Corp. and Shimadzu Corp.. Agilent competes on the basis of product performance, reliability, support quality, applications expertise, global channel coverage and price.
Diagnostics and Genomics Business
Our diagnostics and genomics business providesincludes the reagent partnership, pathology, companion diagnostics, genomics and the nucleic acid contract manufacturing businesses.
Our diagnostics and genomics business is comprised of three areas of activity providing solutions that include reagents, instruments, software and consumables, thatwhich enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the cellular and molecular level. With the acquisition of Dako, a new group ofFirst, our pathology solutions have been added that extend ourbusiness is focused on product offerings to cancer diagnostics withand anatomic pathology workflows. OurThe broad portfolio of offerings includeincludes immunohistochemistry (“IHC”), In Situ Hybridization (“ISH”), Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining,(“H&E”) staining and special staining,staining. We also collaborate with a number of major pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also known as companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy. Second, our genomics business includes arrays for DNA mutation detection, genotyping, gene copy number determination, identification of gene rearrangements, DNA methylation profiling, gene expression profiling, as well as automated gel electrophoresis-based sample analysis systems. We also collaborate with a numberNext Generation Sequencing ("NGS") target enrichment. Finally, our nucleic acid solutions business provides equipment and expertise focused on production of majorsynthesized oligonucleotides under pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also called companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targetedGood Manufacturing Practices ("GMP") conditions for use as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients ("API") in an emerging class of drugs that utilize nucleic acid molecules for disease therapy.
We employed approximately 2,000 people as of October 31, 20122015 in our diagnostics and genomics business. This business generated revenue of $0.4$0.7 billion in fiscal 2012 and $0.32015, $0.7 billion in fiscal 20112014, and 2010.$0.6 billion in fiscal 2013.
Diagnostics and Genomics MarketsMarket
OurWithin diagnostics and genomics business, focuseswe focus primarily on the following three markets:market:
The Diagnostics and Clinical Market. A significant part of our clinical diagnostic customers are in pathology labs throughout the world. Our high-quality, automated pathology tissue staining platforms and solutions are used most heavily by the large labs located in hospitals, medical centers, and reference labs. The market is skewed towards the mature economies, with approximately 75%most of the market in North America, Western Europe and Japan. The mix is changing, however, as emerging markets increase spending on human health.
The clinical market for genomics consists of high complexity clinical labs performing patient testing, including “for-profit” reference laboratories, hospital labs, and molecular diagnostic companies. While these labs primarily purchase in vitro diagnostics (“IVD”) labeled testing kits, they often develop and validate their own molecular based tests. Analyte Specific Reagents (“ASRs”) are often used by these labs.
The Academic and Government Market. This market consists primarily7
The Pharma, Biotech, & CRO Market. This market consists of “for-profit” companies who participate across the pharmaceutical value chain in the areas of therapeutic research, discovery and development and clinical trials. There has been much activity in this market space, where most large Pharma companies have acquired a biopharma arm, enabling development of therapeutics based on both small molecules (classic pharmaceuticals) and large molecules (protein/ antibody based). Due to the relative low drug efficacy within oncology, Pharma companies are partnering with diagnostic companies to bring validated test to the market with their new drugs. Additionally, Pharma companies are more often outsourcing clinical trial work to CRO's, making them a growing portion of this market segment.
Diagnostics and Genomics Products and Applications
Our products fall into sevensix main areas of work: pathology products, specific proteins and flow reagents, target enrichment, cytogenetic research solutions and microarrays, nucleic acid quality control,PCR and qPCR instrumentation and molecular biology products.reagents and nucleic acid solutions.
Pathology Products
This area consists of routine clinical solutions for tissue based cancer diagnostics with solutions that comprise antibodies, reagents, instruments and software targeting both primary and advanced cancer diagnostics. Our CoverStainer and Artisan based product families target primary cancer diagnostics through Hematoxylin and Eosin (“H&E”) staining as well as Special Stains for additional insights and detection of potentially carcinogenic infections. Ourtissue. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we launched our new combined IHC/ISH platform, Dako Omnis. The Dako Omnis and Autostainer based IHC solution and Instant Quality Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ("IQFISH") technologies provide advanced tumor typing through investigation of protein and gene expression. ThisThese products also includes so calledinclude companion diagnostic tests that are used to help identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy.
Specific Proteins and Flow Reagents
Our reagent partnershipOEM business is a provider of clinical diagnostic products within the areas of specific proteins for turbidimetry and reagents for flow cytometry. These are sold OEM as customized reagent solutions supplied to top IVD companies or through retail partners.
Target Enrichment
Agilent continues to be a strong player in the next generation sequencing market. We provide a target enrichment portfolio composed of two main platforms, SureSelect enables researchersand HaloPlex, both enabling customers to enrich their samples for only theselect specific target regions of the genome for sequencing. Customers can customize our products for their regions of interest (for example,using the SureDesign software, or they can choose from a wide range of catalog products, including gene coding region), thus vastly reducing the amountpanels for specific applications and Exome designs, which allow analysis of sequencing needed per sample, and thereby reducing the overall experiment cost. The level of customization available for the SureSelect product line enables researchers to accurately enrich for and sequence the entire exome (gene coding region), as well as other subsetssequences of genes or regions theythe genome. After preparing samples with SureSelect and HaloPlex, products can be sequenced in the main next generation sequencing platforms available in the market. The technologies provide an easy sample prep workflow that can be automated with the Agilent Bravo platform for scalability. HaloPlex provides less-than-24-hours fast workflow, which makes it suitable for labs that require fast turnaround time from sample to results. These products are interested inused for specific research. This is particularly useful for researchers who focus on DNA mutation detection and genotyping. SureSelect is compatible with major next generation sequencing platforms.Results can be easily analyzed using Agilent software solutions GeneSpring or SureCall.
Cytogenetic Research Solutions and Microarrays
Agilent is a leading provider of microarrays for Comparative Genomic Hybridization (“CGH”), mostmostly used by customers in cytogenetic laboratories. The product portfolio has been expandedarrays allow customers to include microarrays that detect bothgenome-wide copy number alterations, with high levels of resolution (from entire chromosomal copy number changes to specific microdeletions or duplications). The arrays are offered in many formats allowing the customers to choose from different levels of resolution and copy neutral changes by utilizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (“SNPs”) onnumber of samples per arrays. Arrays can also be customized using the same microarray.SureDesign software. In addition to the microarrays, Agilent's research solution includes reagents for sample processing, hardware for reading the microarrays, and software to help users view the data in a meaningful way.
Microarrays
In addition to the CGH portfolio, the cytogenetics solution comprises a line of oligonucleotide probes for Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization ("FISH") called SureFISH. Over 400 probes are available in our catalog, covering most relevant regions in the genome. Cytogenetic labs can use SureFISH probes to detect specific translocations or copy number changes in samples. Additionally, Agilent provides a wide range of microarrays to the research market. We offer custom arraysmarket for different types of applications: gene expression, microRNA, methylation, splice variants, and chromatin immunoprecipitation applications. Arrays are offered as catalog designs or customizable designs, with no minimum order size and short delivery time, which differentiates us from other vendors and enables researchers the maximum flexibility in their studies. Our end-to-end solution includes reagents for sample preparation and microarray processing; hardware for sample QC and high-throughput microarray scanning; 60-mer oligo microarrays on industry‑standardindustry-standard 1” × 3” glass slides for key applications (gene expression, microRNA, methylation, splice variants, and chromatin immunoprecipitation applications);applications; custom microarray design services; and GeneSpring and CytoGenomics software products for data analysis.
Nucleic Acid QC
Agilent provides an instrument platform for sizing, quantitation,PCR and quality control of DNA, RNA, and proteins for researchers performing gene expression and next generation sequencing experiments. This platform includes instruments that address the range of throughput needs for genomics scientists. The flagship Bioanalyzer has typically been targeted towards customers with lower throughput needs while the TapeStation is targeted towards higher throughput researchers. Both systems include dedicated analysis software plus pre-packaged consumables and pre-validated methods.
PCR & qPCR Instrumentation and Molecular Biology Reagents
Polymerase Chain Reaction (“PCR”) is a standard laboratory method used to amplify the amount of genetic material of a given sample to enable further interrogation. Quantitative PCR (“qPCR”) or real time PCR is also a standard method used in genomic research facilities to measure the amount of a specific nucleic acid sequence within a sample. There are several applications for qPCR, among the most common are identifying the expression level of a specific gene, or calculating the amount of a specific pathogen present in a sample. Agilent offers a complete portfolio of PCR & qPCR instruments, as well as specialty enzymes for
amplifying difficult sample types. In addition to PCR and qPCR enzymes, Agilent offers a wide range of molecular biology reagents including tools for cloning and mutagenesis applications.
Nucleic Acid Solutions
Our Nucleic Acid Solutions division ("NASD") is a contract manufacturing and development services business with equipment and expertise focused on mid to large scale production of synthesized oligonucleotide APIs (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients) under pharmaceutical GMP conditions for an emerging class of drugs that utilize oligonucleotide molecules for disease therapy. State of the art for these drugs has advanced from single strand DNA molecules to complex, highly modified molecules including antisense, aptamers, double-stranded RNA, and RNA mixtures. These advancements in the technology have greatly improved the efficacy of delivery and stability of the oligos in-vivo. NASD offers industry leading experience to efficiently advance our customer’s oligo drug candidates from clinical trials to commercial launch with a common goal of patient health and safety.
Diagnostics and Genomics Customers
We had over 15,000approximately 14,000 customers infor our diagnostics and genomics business in 2012.fiscal 2015. No single customer represented a material amount of the net revenue of the diagnostics and genomics business. A significant number of our diagnostics and genomics customers are also customers of our life sciences business.
The genomics business is susceptible to seasonality in its orders and revenues primarily based on U.S. and foreign government budgets. In general, the result is that our second and fourth quarters tend to be the strongest quarters for revenues. The diagnostics business is generally a fairly stable business impacted primarily by local holidays. However, general economic trends, new product
introductions and competition might overshadow this trend in any given year.
Diagnostics and Genomics Sales, Marketing and Support
The diagnostics and genomics channel focuseschannels focus on the therapeutics and human disease research customer base (pharma, biotech, CRO, CMO and generics), clinical customer base (pathology labs and high complexity clinical testing labs) as well asand on human disease research customers within Pharma, Biotech, CRO, academic and government genomicsemerging life sciences opportunities in life science research institutes. We deploy a multi-channel approach, marketing products to our customers through direct sales, electronic commerce, resellers, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. We primarily use direct sales to market our pathology clinical solutions in major markets and our genomic solutions to all of our genomicspharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical and clinical accounts. Sales agents and distributors supplement direct sales by providing broader geographic coverage and coverage of smaller accounts. Our active reseller program augments our ability to provide more complete solutions to our customers. We sell our consumable products through distributors, telesales, electronic commerce and direct sales. We utilize telesales for more mature product lines, as well as for reorders of reagent products.
We deliver our support services to customers in a variety of ways, including on-site assistance with repair or exchange of returned products, telephone support and self-diagnostic services provided over the internet. Our genomics products typically come with standard warranties, and extended warranties are available for additional cost. Our complete pathology solutions are often sold with both application and technical service support.
Diagnostics and Genomics Manufacturing
Our manufacturing supports our diverse product range and customer-centric focus. We offer customers the abilityassemble highly configurable products to customize their designs for microarraysindividual customer orders and target enrichment for free through our web portal. Our manufacturing process then converts these designs into custommake standard products for shipment to customers.stock. We employ advanced manufacturing techniques and supply chain management systems to reduce costs and manufacturing cycle times. We selectively use third parties to provide some supply chain processes for manufacturing, warehousing and logistics. We have genomics manufacturing facilities in California, Colorado and Texas (FDA registered) in the U.S. Outside of the U.S., we have genomics manufacturing facilities in Germany, Malaysia Singapore and the U.K.Germany. Our FDA registered sites include California, Colorado, Texas and Denmark. We utilize just-in-time manufacturing. Manufacturingmanufacturing and so typically do not maintain a high level of our pathology products, specific proteins and flow reagents takes place in Denmark and in California, both sites are FDA registered.inventory.
Diagnostics and Genomics Competition
The markets for diagnostics and genomicgenomics analytical products in which we compete are characterized by evolving industry standards and intense competition. Our principal competitors in the diagnostics and genomics arena include: AffymetrixRoche Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Illumina,a member of the Roche Group, Leica Biosystems, Inc., Life Technologies Corp,a division of Danaher Corporation, Abbott Laboratories, Roche, Bio-RadIlumina, Inc. and Perkin-Elmer. Affymetrix, Inc. Agilent competes on the basis of product performance, reliability, support quality, applications expertise, whole solution offering, global channel coverage and price.
Diagnostics and Genomics Government Regulation
Some of the products the diagnostics and genomics business sells are subject to regulatory approval by the FDA and other regulatory bodies throughout the world. These regulations govern a wide variety of product related activities, from quality management, design and development to labeling, manufacturing, promotion, sales and distribution. We continually invest in our manufacturing infrastructure to gain and maintain certifications necessary for the level of clearance. During 2014 and 2015, we have made investments to address the issues identified in the FDA warning letter, now lifted, received by our Glostrup, Denmark facility.
Agilent CrossLab Business
The Agilent CrossLab business spans the entire lab with its extensive consumables and services portfolio, which is designed to improve customer outcomes. The majority of the portfolio is vendor neutral, meaning we can serve and supply customers regardless of their instrument purchase choices. Solutions range from chemistries and supplies to services and software helping to connect the entire lab. Key product categories in consumables include GC and LC columns, sample preparation products, custom chemistries, and a large selection of laboratory instrument supplies. Services include startup, operational, training and compliance support, as well as asset management and consultation services that help increase customer productivity. Custom service and consumable bundles are tailored to meet the specific application needs of various industries and to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements.
Our Agilent CrossLab business employed approximately 3,800 people as of October 31, 2015. Our Agilent CrossLab business generated $1.3 billion in revenue in fiscal 2015, $1.3 billion in revenue in fiscal 2014 and $1.2 billion in revenue in fiscal 2013.
Agilent CrossLab Markets
The Pharmaceutical, Biotechnology, CRO & CMO Market. Our services and consumable products support customers in this market that consists of “for-profit” companies who participate across the pharmaceutical value chain in the areas of therapeutic research, discovery and development, clinical trials, manufacturing and quality assurance and quality control. One sub-segment of this market is core and emerging pharmaceutical companies (“pharma”). A second sub-segment includes biotechnology companies (“biotech”), contract research organizations (“CROs”) and contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”). Biotech companies and, to a somewhat lesser extent, CROs and CMOs typically participate in specific points in the pharmaceutical industry value chain. Additionally, due to the relatively low drug efficacy within oncology, pharma companies are partnering with diagnostic companies to bring validated tests to the market with their new drugs.
The Life Science Research Market. Our services and consumable products support customers in this market that consists primarily of “not-for-profit” organizations and includes academic institutions, large government institutes and privately funded organizations. The life science research market plays an influential role in technology adoption and therapeutic developments for pharmaceutical and molecular diagnostics companies. After decades of investment in basic biomedical research by government funding bodies, the focus has widened to include translational research - multidisciplinary scientific efforts directed at accelerating therapy development.
The Chemical & Energy Market. The natural gas and petroleum refining markets use our services and consumable products to support their quality control and environmental safety reviews.
The Environmental & Forensics Market. Our services and consumable products support the environmental industry customers that perform laboratory and field analysis of chemical pollutants in air, water, soil and solid waste. Environmental industry customers include all levels of government, the industrial and manufacturing sectors, engineering and consulting companies, commercial testing laboratories and colleges and universities. Our services and consumable products also support drug testing and forensics laboratories that are involved with analyzing evidence associated with crime, screening athletes for performance enhancing drugs, analyzing samples for recreational drugs, or detecting and identifying biological and chemical warfare agents. Customers include local, state, federal, and international law enforcement agencies and commercial testing laboratories.
The Food Market. Our services and consumable products support the food production chain, including incoming inspection, new product development, quality control and assurance, and packaging.
The Diagnostics and Clinical Market. Our services and consumable products support clinical diagnostic customers in pathology labs throughout the world. The market is skewed towards the mature economies, with most of the market in North America, Western Europe and Japan. The mix is changing, however, as emerging markets increase spending on human health.
Agilent CrossLab Applications
Chemistries and Supplies
We offer a broad range of consumable products, which support our technology platforms, including sample preparation consumables such as solid phase extraction ("SPE") and filtration products, self-manufactured GC and LC columns, chemical standards, and instrument replacement parts. Consumable products also include scientific instrument parts and supplies such as filters and fittings for GC systems; xenon lamps and cuvettes for UV-Vis-NIR, fluorescence, FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy
instruments; and graphite furnace tubes, hollow cathode lamps and specialized sample introduction glassware for our AA, ICP-OES and ICP-MS products.
Services and Support
We offer a wide range of startup, operational, educational and compliance support services for our measurement and data handling systems. Our support services include maintenance, troubleshooting, repair and training for all of our chemical and bioinstrumentation analysis hardware and software products. Special service bundles have also been designed to meet the specific application needs of various industries.
Remarketed Instruments
We refurbish and resell certified pre-owned instruments to value oriented customers who demand Agilent quality and performance at a budget conscious price.
Agilent CrossLab Customers
We had approximately 39,000 Agilent CrossLab customers in fiscal 2015 and no single customer represented a material amount of the net revenue of the Agilent CrossLab business.
The service and consumables business is mostly recurring in nature, and is not as susceptible to market seasonality and industry cycles in comparison to our instrument businesses. The vendor neutral portion of the portfolio allows the business to perform relatively independent from our instrument business.
Agilent CrossLab Sales, Marketing and Support
We deploy a multi-channel approach, marketing products and services to our customers through direct sales, electronic commerce, resellers, manufacturers' representatives and distributors. We primarily use direct sales to market our solutions to our large accounts. Sales agents supplement direct sales by providing broader geographic coverage and coverage of smaller accounts. Our active reseller program augments our ability to provide more complete solutions to our customers. We utilize telesales to enhance the transactional sales model of our products. All channels are supported by technical product and application specialists to meet our customer’s specific requirements.
We deliver our support services to customers in a variety of ways, including on-site assistance with repair or exchange of returned products, telephone support and self-diagnostic services provided over the Internet. We also offer special industry-focused service bundles that are designed to meet the specific needs of hydrocarbon processing, environmental, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical customers to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements. Our products typically come with standard warranties, and extended warranties are available for additional cost.
Agilent CrossLab Manufacturing
Our primary manufacturing sites for the consumables business are in California and Delaware in the U.S., and outside of the U.S. in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Our direct service delivery organization is regionally based operating in 30 countries.
Agilent CrossLab Competition
Our principal competitors in the pathologyservices and consumable products arena include Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. (Roche Tissue Diagnostics), Leica Biosystems Nussloch GmbH (Danaher Corporation),many of our competitors from the instrument business, such as: Danaher Corporation, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., SakuraWaters Corp, and Abbott Laboratories.Shimadzu Corporation, as well as numerous niche consumables and service providers. Agilent competes on the basis of product performance, reliability, support quality, applications expertise, global channel coverage and price.
Diagnostics and Genomics Government Regulation
Some of the products the diagnostics and genomics group sells are subject to regulatory approval by the FDA and other regulatory bodies throughout the world. As such, we continually invest in our manufacturing infrastructure to gain and maintain certifications necessary for the level of clearance. Our pathology manufacturing facilities in Denmark and California have established quality management systems and manufacturing practices designed to comply with the adequate standards for the in vitro diagnostics industry, including ISO 13485 Medical devices and FDA 21CFR Part 820 quality system regulation as well as additional international standards. Our genomics Cedar Creek, Texas manufacturing facility has been registered with the FDA as a medical device manufacturing facility. This FDA registered facility is the site where our class I ASR SureFISH products are manufactured. Additionally, other facilities maintain ISO 13485 manufacturing compliance.
Electronic Measurement Business
Our electronic measurement business provides electronic measurement instruments and systems, software design tools and related services that are used in the design, development, manufacture, installation, deployment and operation of electronics equipment, and microscopy products. Related services include start-up assistance, instrument productivity and application services and instrument calibration and repair. We also offer customization, consulting and optimization services throughout the customer's product lifecycle.
Our electronic measurement business employed approximately 8,000 people as of October 31, 2012. Our electronic measurement business generated $3.3 billion in revenue in fiscal 2012 and 2011 and $2.8 billion in revenue in fiscal 2010.
Electronic Measurement Markets
Our electronic measurement products serve the following markets:
The Communications Test Market
We market our electronic measurement products and services to network equipment manufacturers ("NEMs"), handset manufacturers, and communications service providers, including the component manufacturers within the supply chain for these customers.
NEMs manufacture and sell products to facilitate the transmission of voice, data and video traffic. The NEMs' customers are the distributors of end-user subscriber devices, including wireless personal communication devices and set-top boxes, as well as communications service providers that deploy and operate the networks and services. To meet their customers' demands, NEMs require test and measurement instruments, systems and solutions for the development, production and installation of each network technology.
Communications service providers require reliable network equipment that enables new service offerings and allows their networks to operate at ever-increasing capacities. To achieve this, communications service providers require a range of sophisticated test instruments and systems to monitor and evaluate network performance and to identify any sources of communications failure.
Handset manufacturers require test and measurement products for the design, development, manufacture and repair of mobile handsets. These mobile handsets are used for voice, data and video delivery to individuals who connect wirelessly to the service provider's network. The handset manufacturers' primary customers are large and small service providers. The handset manufacturers require test and measurement products that enable technology development in conformance with the latest communications standards.
Component manufacturers design, develop and manufacture electronic components and modules used in network equipment and handsets. The component manufacturers require test and measurement products to verify that the performance of their components and modules meet the specifications of their NEM and handset customers.
The communications test market accounted for approximately 37 percent of revenue from our electronic measurement business in 2012.
The General Purpose Test Market
We market our general purpose test products and services to the electronics industry and other industries with significant electronic content such as the aerospace and defense, computer and semiconductor industries. These electronics and electronics-dependent industries design, develop and manufacture a wide range of products, including those produced in high volumes, such as computers, computer peripherals, electronic components, consumer electronics, enterprise servers, storage networks and automotive electronics. The components, printed circuit assemblies and functional devices for these products may be designed, developed and manufactured by electronic components companies, by original equipment manufacturers or by contract manufacturers.
For the development and timely commercialization of new technologies, manufacturers require state-of-the-art test instruments, systems and design software in order to design products for efficient and cost-effective manufacturing and to validate product performance in a variety of configurations and environments.
Customers use our general purpose test solutions in developing and manufacturing a wide variety of electronic components and systems. These customers' test requirements include testing the electrical parameters of digital, radio frequency, and microwave frequency components and assemblies; testing multiple parameters of the printed circuit boards used in almost every electronic device; testing of the final product; and testing of systems containing multiple electronic instruments. For semiconductor and board test applications, customers use our solutions in the design, development, manufacture, installation, deployment, and operation of semiconductor and printed circuit assembly fabrication.
We address the biology, life sciences and material science markets by providing solutions such as the atomic force microscope, nano indenters and scanning electron microscope. For nanotechnology applications, customers use our products to study biological samples at the cellular and molecular level including imaging of DNA and proteins, and to study and research polymers, electrochemistry, and thin films.
The general purpose test market accounted for approximately 63 percent of revenue from our electronic measurement business in 2012.
Electronic Measurement Products
We divide our electronic measurement products into communications test products and general purpose test products.
Communications Test Products
We sell products and services applicable to a wide range of communications networks and systems including wireless communications and microwave networks, voice, broadband, data, and fiber optic networks. Test products include electronic design automation ("EDA") software, vector and signal analyzers, signal generators, vector network analyzers, one box testers, oscilloscopes, logic and protocol analyzers, and bit-error ratio testers.
Our wireless communications and microwave network products include radio frequency and microwave test instruments and EDA software tools. These products are required for the design and production of wireless network products, communications links, cellular handsets and base stations. We provide handheld instruments for the installation and maintenance of wireless networks. Our high-frequency EDA software tools and instruments are used by radio frequency integrated circuit design engineers to model, simulate and analyze communications product designs at the circuit and system levels. Our customers are also applying this technology more frequently to model signal integrity problems in digital design applications as digital speeds continue to increase.
Our suite of fiber optic test products measure and analyze a wide variety of critical optical and electrical parameters in fiber optic networks and their components. Components which can be tested with Agilent solutions include source lasers, optical amplifiers, filters and other passive components. Test products include optical modulation analyzers, optical component analyzers, optical power meters, and optical laser source products.
General Purpose Test Products
We sell the following types of products into the general purpose test market: general purpose instruments, modular instruments and test software, digital test products, semiconductor and board test solutions, electronics manufacturing test equipment, atomic force microscopes and network surveillance solutions.
General purpose instruments are used principally by engineers in research and development laboratories, manufacturing, and calibration and service, for measuring voltage, current, frequency, signal pulse width, modulation and other complex electronics measurements. Our general purpose products include spectrum analyzers, network analyzers, signal generators, logic analyzers, digitizing oscilloscopes, voltmeters, multimeters, frequency counters, bench and system power supplies, function generators and waveform synthesizers.
Modular instruments and test software are used by the designers and manufacturers of electronic devices as the building blocks of systems that can be configured for a wide variety of test applications, and changed as needed by a combination of modular hardware and software components. Examples include test systems for aviation systems maintenance and multi-function university labs.
Our digital test products are used by research and development engineers across a broad range of industries to validate the function and performance of their digital product and system designs. These designs include a wide range of products from simple digital control circuits to complex high speed systems such as computer servers and the latest generation gaming consoles. The test products offered include high-performance oscilloscopes, logic and serial protocol analyzers, logic-signal sources and data generators.
Our semiconductor and board test solutions enable customers to develop and test state of the art semiconductors, test and inspect printed circuit boards, perform functional testing, and measure position and distance information to the sub-nanometer level. We supply parametric test instruments and systems used primarily to examine semiconductor wafers during the manufacturing process. Our in-circuit test system helps identify quality defects, such as faulty or incorrect parts, that affect electrical performance. Our laser interferometer measurement systems are based on precision optical technology and provide precise position or distance information for dimensional measurements.
Our atomic force microscopes ("AFM") are high-resolution imaging devices that can resolve features as small as an atomic
lattice. An AFM allows researchers to observe and manipulate molecular and atomic level features. Our expanding portfolio of AFM products provides customers with reliable, easy-to-use tools for a wide range of nanotechnology applications, including semiconductor, data storage, polymers, materials science and life science studies.
Our surveillance systems and subsystems are used by defense and government engineers and technicians to detect, locate and analyze signals of interest. These signals may be transmitted via radio frequency signals or wire lines. The products offered include receivers for detecting radio frequency signals, probes for detecting wire line signals and software that enables the identification and analysis of these signals.
Electronic Measurement Customers
Agilent's electronic measurement customers include contract manufacturers of electronic products, handset manufacturers and network equipment manufacturers who design, develop, manufacture and install network equipment, service providers who implement, maintain and manage communication networks and services, and companies who design, develop, and manufacture semiconductors and semiconductor lithography systems. Our customers use our products to conduct research and development, manufacture, install and maintain radio frequency, microwave frequency, digital, semiconductor, and optical products and systems and conduct nanotechnology research. Many of our customers purchase solutions across several of our major product lines for their different business units.
We had approximately 15,000 customers for electronic measurement products in fiscal 2012 and no single customer represented a material amount of the net revenue of the electronic measurement business.
In general, the orders and revenues from many of the electronic measurement markets and product categories are seasonal, traditionally marked by lower business levels in the first quarter of the fiscal year and higher volumes in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. This seasonality is particularly evident in products that we sell into the aerospace and defense industry, as well as those linked to consumer spending, which includes some of our communications test equipment. The seasonal impact of our business is tempered by broader economic trends and the diversity of our electronic measurement products and customers, which span multiple industries.
Electronic Measurement Sales, Marketing and Support
We have a focused sales strategy, using a direct sales force, resellers, manufacturer's representatives and distributors to meet our customers' needs. Our direct sales force is focused on identifying customer needs and recommending solutions involving the effective use and deployment of our equipment, services, systems and capabilities. Some members of our direct sales force focus on global accounts, providing uniform services on a worldwide basis. Others focus on our more complex products such as our high-performance instruments, where customers require strategic consultation. Our sales force also engages with the contract manufacturer market by collaborating with original equipment manufacturers to specify our test equipment for contract manufacturer test applications, as well as marketing to contract manufacturers directly.
Our direct sales force consists of field engineers and systems engineers who have in-depth knowledge of the customers' business and technology needs. Our systems engineers provide a combination of consulting, systems integration and application and software engineering services and are instrumental in all stages of the sale, implementation and support of our complex systems and solutions.
To complement our direct sales force we have agreements with many channel partners around the world. These partners, including resellers, manufacturer's representatives, and distributors, serve Agilent's customers across a number of product lines and provide the same level of service and support expected from our direct channel. Lower dollar transactions can also be served by our tele-sales and electronic commerce channels.
Our products typically come with standard warranties, and extended warranties are available at additional cost.
Electronic Measurement Manufacturing
We concentrate our electronic measurement manufacturing efforts primarily on final assembly and test of our products. To maximize our productivity and our ability to respond to market conditions, we use contract manufacturers for the production of printed circuit boards, sheet metal fabrication, metal die-casting, plastic molding and standard electronic components. We also manufacture proprietary devices and assemblies in our own fabrication facilities for competitive advantage. We have manufacturing facilities in California and Colorado in the U.S. Outside of the U.S. we have manufacturing facilities in China, Germany, Japan and Malaysia.
We generally only manufacture products when we have received firm orders for delivery and do not generally hold large stocks of finished inventory.
Electronic Measurement Competition
The market for electronic measurement equipment is highly competitive. Our electronic measurement business competes with a number of significant competitors in all our major product categories and across our targeted industries. In the communications test market our primary competitors are Aeroflex Incorporated, Anritsu Corporation, Ansoft Corporation (a subsidiary of Ansys Corporation), National Instruments Corporation, Rohde & Schwartz GmbH & Co. KG, Spirent plc, Tektronix, Inc. (a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation) and Teradyne, Inc. In the general purpose test market, we compete against companies such as Aeroflex Incorporated, Bruker Corporation, Fluke Corporation (a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, National Instruments Corporation, Rohde & Schwartz GmbH & Co. KG, Tektronix, Inc. (a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation), Teradyne, Inc., Test Research Inc., and Zygo Corporation.
Our electronic measurement business offers a wide range of products, and these products compete primarily on the basis of product quality and functionality, as well as performance and reliability.
Agilent Technologies Research Laboratories
Agilent Technologies Research Laboratories ("Research Labs") is our research organization based in Santa Clara, California, with offices in Europe and China.Asia. The Research Labs create competitive advantage through high-impact technology, driving market leadership and growth in Agilent's core businesses and expanding Agilent's measurement footprint into adjacent markets. At the cross-roads of the organization, the Research Labs are able to identify and enable synergies across Agilent's businesses to create competitive differentiation and compelling customer value.
The technical staff have advanced degrees that cover a wide range of scientific and engineering fields, including biology, chemistry, computer science, distributed measurement, electrical engineering, image processing, materials science, mathematics, nano/microfabrication, microfluidics, software, informatics, optics, physics physiology and signal processing. As of the end of October 2012, Research Labs employed approximately 250 personnel worldwide.physiology.
Global Infrastructure Organization
We provide support to our businesses through our global infrastructure organization. This support includes services in the areas of finance, legal, workplace services, human resources and information technology. Generally these organizations are centrally operated from Santa Clara, California, with services provided worldwide. As of the end of October 2012,2015, our global infrastructure organization employed approximately 3,0001,800 people worldwide including Research Labs.worldwide.
Agilent Order Fulfillment OrganizationOrganizations
Beginning in fiscal year 2012, we created the Agilent Order FulfillmentOur order fulfillment and supply chain organization to centralize(“OFS”) centralizes all order fulfillment and supply organizations and operations. AOF leverageschain operations in our strength inbusinesses. OFS provides resources for manufacturing, engineering and strategic sourcing and logistics for life sciences, chemical analysis and electronic measurementto our respective businesses. In general, AOFOFS employees are dedicated to specific businesses and business headcount numbers include AOF employees.the associated costs are directly allocated to those businesses.
The following discussions of Research and Development, Backlog, Intellectual Property, Materials, Environmental, International Operations and Acquisition and Disposal of Material Assets include information common to each of our businesses.
Research and Development
Research and development ("R&D") expenditures were $668$330 million in 2012, $6492015, $358 million in 20112014 and $612$337 million in 2010,2013, the vast majority of which was company-sponsored. We anticipate that we will continue to have significant R&D expenditures in order to maintain our competitive position with a continuing flow of innovative, high-quality products and services.
Backlog
Backlog represents the amount of revenue expected from orders that have already been booked, including orders for goods and services that have not been delivered to customers, orders invoiced but not yet recognized as revenue, and orders for goods
that were shipped but not invoiced, awaiting acceptance by customers. Backlog amounts have been restated for the year ended October 31, 2011 to conform to this definition.
On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the electronic measurement business was approximately $800 million, as compared to approximately $850 million at October 31, 2011. On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the chemical analysis business was approximately $360 million, as compared to approximately $320 million at October 31, 2011. Within our life sciences business, our unfilled backlog was approximately $500 million on October 31, 2012 as compared to approximately $490 million at October 31, 2011. On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the diagnostics and genomics business was approximately $30 million, as compared to approximately $30 million at October 31, 2011. We expect that a majority of the unfilled backlog for all four businesses will be delivered to customers within six months. On average, our unfilled backlog represents approximately three months' worth of revenues. We believe that backlog on any particular date, while indicative of short-term revenue performance, is not necessarily a reliablemeaningful indicator of medium or long-termfuture business prospects for our business segments since a significant portion of our revenue performance.for a given quarter is derived from the current quarter's orders. Therefore, we believe that backlog information is not material to an understanding of our business.
Intellectual Property
We generate patent and other intellectual property rights covering significant inventions and other innovations in order to create a competitive advantage. While we believe that our licenses, patents and other intellectual property rights have value, in general no single license, patent or other intellectual property right is in itself material. In addition, our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or may otherwise not provide significant competitive advantage.
Materials
Our manufacturing operations employ a wide variety of semiconductors, electromechanical components and assemblies and raw materials such as plastic resins and sheet metal. Our electronic measurement, chemical analysis, life sciences and applied markets, diagnostics and genomics and Agilent CrossLab businesses all purchase materials from thousands of suppliers on a global basis. Some of the parts that require custom design work are not readily available from alternate suppliers due to their unique design or the length of time necessary for design work. Our long-term relationships with suppliers allow us to proactively manage technology road maps and product discontinuance plans and monitor their financial health. Even so, some suppliers may still extend their lead times, limit supplies, increase prices or cease to produce necessary parts for our products. If these are unique components, we may not be able to find a substitute quickly or at all. To address the potential disruption in our supply chain, we use a number of techniques, including qualifying multiple sources of supply and redesign of products for alternative components. In addition, while we generally attempt to keep our inventory at minimal levels, we do purchase incremental inventory as circumstances warrant to protect the supply chain.
Environmental
Our R&D, manufacturing and distribution operations involve the use of hazardous substances and are regulated under international, federal, state and local laws governing health and safety and the environment. We apply strict standards for protection of the environment and occupational health and safety to sites inside and outside the U.S., even if not subject to regulation imposed by foreign governments. We believe that our properties and operations at our facilities comply in all material respects with applicable environmental laws and occupational health and safety laws. However, the risk of environmental liabilities cannot be completely eliminated and there can be no assurance that the application of environmental and health and safety laws to Agilent will not require us to incur significant expenditures. We are also regulated under a number of international, federal, state, and local laws regarding recycling, product packaging and product content requirements. The environmental, product content/disposal and recycling laws are gradually becoming more stringent and may cause us to incur significant expenditures in the future.
SomeCertain properties transferred to Keysight as part of our operations are located on properties thatthe separation are known to have subsurface contamination undergoing remediation by our former parent company,HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP"Enterprise (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company) (together "HP"). In addition, a subset of these properties are undergoing remediation by HP under an order of an agency of the state in which the property is located. As part of the initial separation agreement from HP in 1999, HP agreed to retain the liability for the contamination, perform the required remediation and indemnify us with respect to claims arising out of the contamination. In connection with the separation of Keysight, HP has agreed to transfer that indemnity to Keysight. The determination of the existence and cost of remediation of additional contamination caused by us prior to the separation of Keysight, if any, could involve costly and time-consuming negotiations and litigation. While we expect that HP will meet its remediation and indemnification obligations in this regard, there can be no guarantee that it will do so.so, in which case Keysight may seek indemnification from us. It is also possible that one or more of the governmental agencies will require us to be named under a remediation order. The naming of Agilent will not affect HP’s obligation to indemnify us or Keysight with regard to these matters. Under our agreement with HP and now HP’s agreement with Keysight, HP will have access to thesethose Keysight properties to perform the remediation. HP has agreed to minimize interference with on-site operations at those properties during the course of the remediation, but there can be no guarantee that our operations will not be interrupted or that weKeysight will not be required to incur unreimbursed costs associated with the remediation. The remediation could also harm on-site operations and the future use and negatively affect the value and future use of the properties. We cannot be sure that Keysight will not seek additional reimbursement from us for that interference or unreimbursed costs. Several of the sites under the initial separation agreement from HP have been sold.
In addition, some of these properties are undergoing remediation by HP under an order of an agency of the state in which
the property is located. Although HP has agreed to indemnify us with respect to such subsurface contamination, it is possible that one or more of the governmental agencies will require us to be named on any of these orders. The naming of Agilent will not affect HP's obligation to indemnify us with regard to these matters.
We are liable and are indemnifying HP for any contamination found at all facilities transferred to us by HP excluding the properties undergoing remediation. In addition, we are obligated to indemnify HP for liability associated with past non-compliance with environmental laws regulating ongoing operations, if any, at all properties transferred to us by HP, as well as at sold or discontinued businesses that are related to our businesses. While we are not aware of any material liabilities associated with such indemnified matters, there is no guarantee that such contamination or regulatory non-compliance does not exist, and will not expose us to material liability in the future.
According to the separation agreement with Keysight, we are liable and are indemnifying Keysight with respect to any liability associated with contamination prior to the separation at properties transferred by us to Keysight. While we are not aware of any material liabilities associated with such indemnified matters, other than the remediation by HP, there is no guarantee that such contamination does not exist, and will not expose us to material liability in the future.
We are being indemnified by HP with respect to all environmental liabilities for which HP accrued a reserve, and we are not aware of any material environmental liabilities assumed by us which are not subject to the indemnity.
As part of our acquisition of Varian Inc., ("Varian") in 2010, we assumed the liabilities of Varian, including Varian's costs and potential liabilities for environmental matters. One such cost is our obligation, along with the obligation of Varian
Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. ("VSEA") (under the terms of a Distribution Agreement between Varian, VSEA and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("VMS")) to each indemnify VMS for one-third of certain costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs) relating to (a) environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities at certain facilities previously operated by Varian Associates, Inc. ("VAI") and third-party claims made in connection with environmental conditions at those facilities, and (b) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or third-party claims alleging that VAI or VMS is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA") in connection with certain sites to which VAI allegedly shipped manufacturing waste for recycling, treatment or disposal (the "CERCLA sites"). With respect to the facilities formerly operated by VAI, VMS is overseeing the environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities, in most cases under the direction of, or in consultation with, federal, state and/or local agencies, and handling third-party claims. VMS is also handling claims relating to the CERCLA sites. Although any ultimate liability arising from environmental- related matters could result in significant expenditures that, if aggregated and assumed to occur within a single fiscal year, could be material to our financial statements, the likelihood of such occurrence is considered remote. Based on information currently available and our best assessment of the ultimate amount and timing of environmental-related events, management believes that the costs of environmental-related matters are unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We maintain a comprehensive Environmental Site Liability insurance policy which may cover certain clean-up costs or legal claims related to environmental contamination. This policy covers specified active, inactive and divested locations.
International Operations
Our net revenue originating outside the U.S., as a percentage of our total net revenue, was approximately 68 percent in fiscal 2012, 70 percent in fiscal 2011, and 682015, 75 percent in fiscal 2010,2014, and 72 percent in fiscal 2013, the majority of which was from customers other than foreign governments. Annual revenues derived from China were approximately 16 percent in fiscal 2012 and 2011 and 142015, 13 percent in fiscal 2010. Approximately 10 percent of our revenue in fiscal 2012, 112014 and 16 percent in fiscal 2011 and 10 percent in fiscal 2010 was derived from Japan.2013. Revenues from external customers are generally attributed to countries based upon the location of the Agilent sales representative.
Long-lived assets located outside of the U.S., as a percentage of our total long-lived assets, was approximately 6049 percent in fiscal year 2012, 562015 and 54 percent in fiscal year 2011 and 52 percent in fiscal year 2010. Approximately 12, 13 and 13 percent of our long-lived assets were located in Japan in fiscal years 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.2014.
Most of our sales in international markets are made by foreign sales subsidiaries. In countries with low sales volumes, sales are made through various representatives and distributors. However, we also sell into international markets directly from the U.S.
Our international business is subject to risks customarily encountered in foreign operations, including interruption to transportation flows for delivery of parts to us and finished goods to our customers, changes in a specific country's or region's political or economic conditions, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements, consequences from changes in tax laws and regulatory requirements, difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations, differing labor regulations, differing protection of intellectual property and geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war. We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales and expenses, and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the local functional currency, and may also become subject to interest rate risk inherent in any debt we incur, or investment portfolios we hold. There may be an increased risk of political unrest in regions where we have significant
manufacturing operations such as Southeast Asia. However, we believe that our international diversification provides stability to our worldwide operations and reduces the impact on us of adverse economic changes in any single country. Financial information about our international operations is contained in Note 21,22, "Segment Information", to our consolidated financial statements.
Acquisition and Disposal of Material Assets
On June 21, 2012,September 19, 2013, Agilent announced plans to separate into two publicly traded companies, one comprising of the life sciences, diagnostics and chemical analysis businesses that retained the Agilent name, and the other one that comprised of the electronic measurement business that was renamed Keysight Technologies, Inc. (“Keysight”). Keysight was incorporated in Delaware as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent on December 6, 2013. On November 1, 2014, we acquired Dako throughcompleted the purchasedistribution of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Keysight to Agilent stockholders who received one share capital of Dako, a limited liability company incorporated under the lawsKeysight common stock for every two shares of Denmark, under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. Dako provides antibodies, reagents, scientific instruments and software primarily to customers in pathology laboratories. As a resultAgilent held as of the acquisition, Dako has become a wholly-owned subsidiaryclose of Agilent. The consideration paid was approximately $2.143 billion, of which $1.4 billion was paid directly tobusiness on the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy the outstanding debt of Dako. Agilent funded the acquisition using our existing cash.record date, October 22, 2014.
On May 14 2010, we completed our acquisition
Table of Varian, Inc., a leading supplier of scientific instrumentation and associated consumables for life science and applied market applications, for a total cash purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion. Varian's products include analytical instruments, research products and related software, consumable products, accessories and services, as well as vacuum products and related services and accessories. The acquisition broadens Agilent's applications and solutions offerings in life sciences, environmental, and energy and materials. It also expands Agilent's product portfolio into atomic and molecular spectroscopy; establishes a leading position in nuclear magnetic resonance, imaging and vacuum technologies; and strengthens our consumables portfolio. We financed the purchase price of Varian using the proceeds from our September 2009 offering of senior notes and other existing cash. Varian's cash acquired at completion of the acquisition was approximately $226 million.Contents Executive Officers of the Registrant
The names of our current executive officers and their ages, titles and biographies appear below:
Solange Glaize,Henrik Ancher-Jensen, 50, has served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Order Fulfillment since September 2013. From September 2012 to September 2013, Mr. Ancher-Jensen served as our Vice President, Global Product Supply, Diagnostics and Genomics Group. From September 2010 to September 2012 he served as Corporate Vice President, Global Operations of Dako A/S, a Danish diagnostics company, and as Dako’s Vice President, Supply Chain and Chief Information Officer from 2006 to September 2010. Prior to joining Dako, he spent more than 15 years in senior management roles and management consulting with Chr. Hansen, Deloitte Consulting and NVE.
Mark Doak, 60, has served as our Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Agilent CrossLab Group (formerly a group within the Life Sciences & Applied Markets Group) since September 2014. From August 2008 to September 2014, Mr. Doak served as our Senior Vice President, Agilent and General Manager of the Services and Support Division. Prior to that, he held several senior management positions across functions in marketing, quality and services.
Rodney Gonsalves, 48,50, has served as our Vice President, Corporate Controllership and Chief Accounting Officer since March, 2012.May 2015. From June 2011September 2009 to March 2012, Ms. GlaizeMay 2015, Mr. Gonsalves served as Vice President and operational CFO for various business groups within the Company, most recently for the Life Sciences and Applied Markets Group. From January 2007 to August 2009 he served as our Vice Presidentvice president of Finance and Business Development, Group CFO, Life Sciences Group and from September 2009Investor Relations. Prior to June 2011 as Vice President of Finance, Group CFO, Life Sciences Group. From May 2005 to November 2009, she served as Senior Director of Finance, Life Sciences Solution Unit. Ms. Glaize has previouslyassuming this position, Mr. Gonsalves served in various capacities for Agilent, including as Director of Finance, Worldwide Order Fulfillment, Director of Sales Financecontroller, corporate governance and Administration, Semiconductor Products Groupcustomer financing in Agilent’s Global Infrastructure Organization, and as Managing Director, European Financial Services.controller for the Photonics Systems Business Unit. Prior to joining Agilent, Ms. GlaizeMr. Gonsalves held a variety of positions in finance with Hewlett-Packard Company.Hewlett- Packard Co. Mr. Gonsalves holds a master’s degree in business administration from Santa Clara University in California.
Jean M. Halloran,Dominique P. Grau 60,56, has served as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources since from August 1999.2014. From 1997May 2012 to 1999, Ms. HalloranAugust 2014 Mr. Grau served as Director of Corporate Education and Development for Hewlett‑Packard.Vice President, Worldwide Human Resources. Prior to assuming this position,that, he served as Vice President, Compensation, Benefits and HR Services from 1993May 2006 to 1997, Ms. Halloran acted as human resources managerMay 2012. Mr. Grau had previously served in various capacities for Hewlett‑Packard's Measurement Systems Organization. Ms. Halloran joined Hewlett‑Packard in 1980 in the Medical Products Group, where she held a variety of positions in human resources, manufacturingAgilent and strategic planning.Hewlett-Packard Company.
Didier Hirsch, 61,64, has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2010 and served as interim Chief Financial Officer from April 2010 to July 2010. Prior to that he served as Vice President, Corporate Controllership and Tax from November 2006 to July 20, 2010 and as Chief Accounting Officer from November 2007 to July 20, 2010. From April 2003 to October 2006, Mr. Hirsch served as Vice President and Controller. Prior to assuming this position, Mr. Hirsch served as Vice President and Treasurer from September 1999 to April 2003. Mr. Hirsch had joined Hewlett‑Packard Company in 1989 as Director of Finance and Administration of Hewlett‑Packard France. In 1993, he became Director of Finance and Administration of Hewlett‑ Packard Asia Pacific, and in 1996 Director of Finance and Administration of Hewlett‑Packard Europe, Middle East, and Africa. Mr. Hirsch serves on the Board of Directors of Logitech International and International RectifierKnowles Corporation.
Marie Oh Huber,Patrick K. Kaltenbach, 52 51,, has served as Senior Vice President, General CounselAgilent and SecretaryPresident, Life Sciences and Applied Markets Group since September 2009 and serves as an officer or director for a variety of Agilent subsidiaries. SheNovember 2014. From January 2014 to November 2014 he served as our Vice President Deputyand General CounselManager of the Life Sciences Products and Assistant Secretary from June 2007Solutions organization. Prior to September 2009 andthat he served as our Vice President Assistantand General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from July 2002 to June 2007. She is also a directorManager of the American Leadership Forum - Silicon Valley.Liquid Phase Division from December 2012 to January 2014. From July 2010 to December 2012 he served as Vice President and General Manager of the Liquid Phase Separations Business. Prior to that he served as General Manager of the Liquid Chromatography Business from February 2008 to July 2010. Mr. Kaltenbach has held various positions in R&D management and senior management beginning at Hewlett-Packard Co.
Michael R. McMullen, 51,54, has served as Chief Executive Officer since March 2015 and as President since September 2014. From September 2014 to March 2015 he also served as Chief Operating Officer. From September 2009 to September 2014 he served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Chemical Analysis Group since September 2009.Group. From January 2002 to September 2009, he served as our Vice President and General Manager of the Chemical Analysis Solutions Unit of the Life Sciences and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to assuming this position, from March 1999 to December 2001, Mr. McMullen served as Country Manager for Agilent's China, Japan and Korea Life Sciences and Chemical
Analysis Group. Prior to this position, Mr. McMullen served as our Controller for the Hewlett‑Packard Company and Yokogawa Electric Joint Venture from July 1996 to March 1999.
Ronald S. Nersesian, 53, has served as President since November 2012 and as Chief Operating Officer since November 2011. From November 2011 to November 2012 Mr. Nersesian served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. He served as our Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Electronic Measurement Group from March 2009 to November 2011, as our Vice President and General Manager of the Wireless Business Unit of the Electronics Measurement Group from February 2005 to February 2009, and as our Vice President and General Manager of the Design Validation Division from May 2002 to February 2005. Prior to joining Agilent, Mr. Nersesian served in management positions with LeCroy Corporation from 1996 to 2002. Mr. Nersesian serves on the Board of Directors of Trimble Navigation Limited.
Nicolas H. Roelofs,Jacob Thaysen 54,, 40, has served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Life SciencesDiagnostics and Genomics Group since September 2009.November 2014. From June 2006October 2013 to September 2009November 2014 he served as our Vice President and General Manager of the Life Sciences Solutions Unit of the Life SciencesDiagnostics and Chemical Analysis Group. Prior to joining Agilent, Mr. Roelofs served as Group Operations Officer of the Life Sciences Group of Bio-Rad Laboratories from January 2005 to May 2006.Genomics business. Prior to that Mr. Roelofshe served as Chief Operating Officer of Stratagene Corporation from September 2001 to December 2004.
Guy Séné, 58, has served as Senior Vice President, Agilent and President, Electronic Measurement Group since November 2011. From May 2009 to November 2011, Mr. Séné served as our Vice President and General Manager Microwave and Communications Division of the Electronic Measurement Group, andGenomics Solutions unit from January 2013 to October 20062013. Before joining Agilent, he was Corporate Vice President of R&D at Dako A/S, a Danish diagnostics
company from April 2011 to January 2013. His previous positions at Dako include Vice President, System Development, R&D from March 2010 to April 2009, he served as our2011, Vice President, Strategic Marketing from April 2009 to March 2010 and General Manager, Signal Analysis Division. Vice President, Global Sales Operations from August 2008 to March 2009. Prior to that,Dako, Mr. Séné heldThaysen worked as a broad variety of positions in sales, marketingmanagement consultant and support in Europe and Asia for Agilent and Hewlett‑Packard Company.
William P. Sullivan, 62, has served as Agilent's Chief ExecutiveTechnical Officer and founder of a Director since March 2005 and as President from March 2005 to November 2012. Before being named as Agilent's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sullivan served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2002 to March 2005. In that capacity, he shared the responsibilities of the president's office with Agilent's former President and Chief Executive Officer, Edward W. Barnholt. Mr. Sullivan also had overall responsibility for Agilent's Electronic Products and Solutions Group, the company's largest business group. Prior to assuming that position, Mr. Sullivan served as our Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group, from August 1999 to March 2002. Before that, Mr. Sullivan held various management positions at Hewlett‑Packard Company. Mr. Sullivan serves on the Board of the Children's Discovery Museum in San Jose, California, as well as on the Board of Directors of URS Corporation and Avnet, Inc.high-tech start-up company.
Investor Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Therefore, we file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such reports, proxy statements and other information may be read and copied by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
You can access financial and other information at our Investor Relations website. The address is www.investor.agilent.com. We make available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC.
Our Amended and Restated Corporate Governance Standards, the charters of our Audit and Finance Committee, our Compensation Committee, our Executive Committee and our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, as well as our Standards of Business Conduct (including code of ethics provisions that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and senior financial officers) are available on our website at www.investor.agilent.com under “Corporate Governance”. These items are also available in print to any stockholder in the United States and Canada who requests them by calling (877) 942-4200. This information is also available by writing to the company at the address on the cover of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ItemITEM 1A. Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS
Risks, Uncertainties and Other Factors That May Affect Future Results
Depressed general economic conditions may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Our business is sensitive to changes in general economic conditions, both inside and outside the U.S. An economic downturn may adversely impact our business resulting in:
reduced demand for our products, delays in the shipment of orders, or increases in order cancellations;
increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories;
increased price pressure for our products and services; and
greater risk of impairment to the value, and a detriment to the liquidity, of our investment portfolio.
Our operating results and financial condition could be harmed if the markets into which we sell our products decline or do not grow as anticipated.
Visibility into our markets is limited. Our quarterly sales and operating results are highly dependent on the volume and timing of orders received during the fiscal quarter, which are difficult to forecast and may be cancelled by our customers. A large amount of our orders are back-end loaded toward the end of our second and fourth fiscal quarters and their timing may be influenced by the sales incentive programs we have in place. In addition, our revenues and earnings forecasts for future fiscal quarters are often based on the expected seasonality or cyclicality of our markets. However, the markets we serve do not always experience the seasonality or cyclicality that we expect. Any decline in our customers' markets or in general economic conditions including declines related to the current market disruptions described above, would likely result in a reduction in demand for our products and services. The broader semiconductor market is one of the drivers for our electronic measurement business, and therefore, a decrease in the semiconductor market could harm our electronic measurement business. Also, if our customers' markets decline, we may not be able to collect on outstanding amounts due to us. Such declines could harm our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows and stock price, and could limit our profitability. Also, in such an environment, pricing pressures could intensify. Since a significant portion of our operating expenses is relatively fixed in nature due to sales, research and development and manufacturing costs, if we were unable to respond quickly enough these pricing pressures could further reduce our operating margins.
If we do not introduce successful new products and services in a timely manner to address increased competition through frequent new product and service introductions, rapid technological changes and changing industry standards, our products and services will become obsolete, and our operating results will suffer.
We generally sell our products in industries that are characterized by rapid technological changes,increased competition through frequent new product and service introductions, rapid technological changes and changing industry standards. In addition, many of the markets in which we operate are seasonal and cyclical.seasonal. Without the timely introduction of new products, services and enhancements, our products and services will become technologically obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer. The success of our new products and services will depend on several factors, including our ability to:
properly identify customer needs and predict future needs;
innovate and develop new technologies, services and applications;
successfully commercialize new technologies in a timely manner;
manufacture and deliver our products in sufficient volumes and on time;
differentiate our offerings from our competitors' offerings;
price our products competitively;
anticipate our competitors' development of new products, services or technological innovations; and
control product quality in our manufacturing process.
Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing other portions of our supply chainGeneral economic conditions may adversely affect our ability to bring products to marketoperating results and damage our reputation. Dependence on outsourced information technology and other administrative functions may impair our ability to operate effectively.financial condition.
As partOur business is sensitive to negative changes in general economic conditions, both inside and outside the U.S. Slower global economic growth and uncertainty in the markets in which we operate may adversely impact our business resulting in:
reduced demand for our products, delays in the shipment of orders, or increases in order cancellations;
increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories;
increased price pressure for our products and services; and
greater risk of impairment to the value, and a detriment to the liquidity, of our efforts to streamline operations and to cut costs, we outsource aspects of our manufacturing processes and other functions and continue to evaluate additional outsourcing. If our contract manufacturers or other outsourcers fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. For example, during a market upturn, our contract manufacturers may be unable to meet our demand requirements, which may preclude us from fulfilling our customers' orders on a timely basis. The ability of these manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control. Additionally, changing or replacing our contract manufacturers or other outsourcers could cause disruptions or delays. In addition, we outsource significant portions of our information technology ("IT") and other administrative
functions. Since IT is critical to our operations, any failure to perform on the part of our IT providers could impair our ability to operate effectively. In addition to the risks outlined above, problems with manufacturing or IT outsourcing could result in lower revenues, unexecuted efficiencies, and impact our results of operations and our stock price. Much of our outsourcing takes place in developing countries and, as a result, may be subject to geopolitical uncertainty.
If we are unable to successfully manage the consolidation and streamlining of our manufacturing operations, we may not achieve desired efficiencies and our ability to deliver products to our customers could be disrupted.
Although we utilize manufacturing facilities throughout the world, we have been consolidating, and may continue to consolidate, our manufacturing operations to certain of our plants to achieve efficiencies and gross margin improvements. Additionally, we typically consolidate the production of products from our acquisitions into our supply chain and manufacturing processes, which are technically complex and require expertise to operate. If we are unable to establish processes to efficiently and effectively produce high quality products in the consolidated locations, we may not achieve the anticipated synergies and production may be disrupted, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.investment portfolio.
Failure to adjust our purchases due to changing market conditions or failure to estimate our customers' demand could adversely affect our income.
Our income could be harmed if we are unable to adjust our purchases to reflect market fluctuations, including those caused by the seasonal or cyclical nature of the markets in which we operate. The sale of our products and services are dependent, to a large degree, on customers whose industries are subject to seasonal or cyclical trends in the demand for their products. For example, the consumer electronics market is particularly volatile, making demand difficult to anticipate. During a market upturn, we may not be able to purchase sufficient supplies or components to meet increasing product demand, which could materially affect our results. In the past we have seen a shortage of parts for some of our products. In addition, some of the parts that require custom design are not readily available from alternate suppliers due to their unique design or the length of time necessary for design work. Should a supplier cease manufacturing such a component, we would be forced to reengineer our product. In addition to discontinuing parts, suppliers may also extend lead times, limit supplies or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. In order to secure components for the production of products, we may continue to enter into non-cancelable purchase commitments with vendors, or at times make advance payments to suppliers, which could impact our ability to adjust our inventory to declining market demands. Prior commitments of this type have resulted in an excess of parts when demand for our communications and electronics products has decreased. If demand for our products is less than we expect, we may experience additional excess and obsolete inventories and be forced to incur additional charges.
Demand for some of our products and services depends on capital spending policies of our customers, research and development budgets and on government funding policies.
Our operating results may suffer if our manufacturing capacity does not matchcustomers include pharmaceutical companies, laboratories, universities, healthcare providers, government agencies and public and private research institutions. Fluctuations in the research and development budgets at these organizations could have a significant effect on the demand for our products.
Because we cannot immediately adaptproducts and services. Many factors, including public policy spending priorities, available resources, mergers and consolidation, spending priorities, institutional and governmental budgetary policies and product and economic cycles, have a significant effect on the capital spending policies of these entities. Research and development budgets fluctuate due to changes in available resources, consolidation, spending priorities, general economic conditions and institutional and governmental budgetary policies. The timing and amount of revenues from customers that rely on government funding or research may vary significantly due to factors that can be difficult to forecast. These policies in turn can have a significant effect on the demand for our production capacityproducts and related cost structures to rapidly changing market conditions, whenservices. If demand does not meetfor our expectations,products and services is adversely affected, our manufacturing capacity will likely exceed our production requirements. If, during a general market upturn or an upturn in one of our segments, we cannot increase our manufacturing capacity to meet product demand, we will not be able to fulfill orders in a timely manner which could lead to order cancellations, contract breaches or indemnification obligations. This inability could materially and adversely limit our ability to improve our results. By contrast, if during an economic downturn we had excess manufacturing capacity, then our fixed costs associated with excess manufacturing capacity would adversely affect our income, margins,revenue and operating results.results would suffer.
Economic, political, foreign currency and other risks associated with international sales and operations could adversely affect our results of operations.
Because we sell our products worldwide, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. We anticipate that revenue from international operations will continue to represent a majority of our total revenue. International revenues and costs are subject to the risk that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our financial results when translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. The unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates has decreased revenues by approximately 6 percentage points in the year ended October 31, 2015. In addition, many of our employees, contract manufacturers, suppliers, job functions and manufacturing facilities are located outside the U.S. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
interruption to transportation flows for delivery of parts to us and finished goods to our customers;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
changes in a specific country's or region's political, economic or other conditions;
trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
negative consequences from changes in tax laws;laws including changes to U.S. tax legislation that could materially increase our effective tax rate;
difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations;
differing labor regulations;
differing protection of intellectual property;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and
geopolitical turmoil, including terrorism and war.
We centralized most of our accounting and tax processes to two locations: India and Malaysia. These processes include general accounting, cost accounting, accounts payable, and accounts receivables and tax functions. If conditions change in those countries, it may adversely affect operations, including impairing our ability to pay our suppliers and collect our receivables. Our results of operations, as well as our liquidity, may be adversely affected and possible delays may occur in reporting financial results.
Additionally, we must comply with complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials, and anti-competition regulations. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions, restrictions on our business conduct and on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries, and could also materially affect our brand, our ability to attract and retain employees, our international operations, our business and our operating results. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, or agents will not violate our policies.
In addition, although the majority of our products are priced and paid for in U.S. dollars, a significant amount of certain types of expenses, such as payroll, utilities, tax, and marketing expenses, are paid in local currencies. Our hedging programs reduce, but do not always entirely eliminate, within any given twelve month period, the impact of currency exchange rate movements, and therefore fluctuations in exchange rates, including those caused by currency controls, could impact our business operating results and financial condition by resulting in lower revenue or increased expenses. However, for expenses beyond that twelve month period, our hedging strategy does not mitigate our exposure. In addition, our currency hedging programs involve third party financial institutions as counterparties. The weakening or failure of financial institution counterparties may adversely affect our hedging programs and our financial condition through, among other things, a reduction in available counterparties, increasingly unfavorable terms, and the failure of the counterparties to perform under hedging contracts.
Our strategic initiatives could have long-term adverse effects on our business and we may not realize the operational or financial benefits from such actions.
We have implemented multiple strategic initiatives across our businesses to adjust our cost structure, and we may engage in similar activities in the future. These strategic initiatives and our regular ongoing cost reduction activities may distract management, could slow improvements in our products and services and limit our ability to increase production quickly if demand for our products increases. In addition, delays in implementing our strategic initiatives, unexpected costs or failure to meet targeted improvements may diminish the operational and financial benefits we realize from such actions. Any of the above circumstances could have an adverse effect on our business and financial statements.
Our business will suffer if we are not able to retain and hire key personnel.
Our future success depends partly on the continued service of our key research, engineering, sales, marketing, manufacturing, executive and administrative personnel. If we fail to retain and hire a sufficient number of these personnel, we will not be able to maintain or expand our business. The markets in which we operate are very dynamic, and our businesses continue to respond with reorganizations, workforce reductions and site closures. We believe our pay levels are very competitive within the regions that we operate. However, there is alsoan intense competition for certain highly technical specialties in geographic areas where we continue to recruit, and it may become more difficult to retain our key employees, especially in light of our ongoing restructuring efforts.employees.
Our acquisitions, strategic alliances, joint ventures and divestitures may result in financial results that are different than expected.
In the normal course of business, we frequently engage in discussions with third parties relating to possible acquisitions, strategic alliances, joint ventures and divestitures, and generally expect to complete several transactions per year. For example, during fiscal 2010, we closed our acquisition of Varian, Inc. and the sale of our Network Solutions Division. During fiscal 2011, we completed the acquisitions of A2 Technologies, Lab901 and Biocius Life Sciences Inc. During fiscal 2012, we completed various acquisitions, including Dako A/S, BioSystem Development LLC, Halo Genomics AB, the test systems division of AT4 wireless, and the test and measurement businesses of Centellax Inc. As a result of such transactions, our financial results may differ from our own or the investment community's expectations in a given fiscal quarter, or over the long term. Such transactions often have post-closing arrangements including but not limited to post-closing adjustments, transition services, escrows or indemnifications, the financial results of which can be difficult to predict. In addition, acquisitions and strategic alliances may require us to integrate a different company culture, management team and business infrastructure. We may have difficulty developing, manufacturing and marketing the products of a newly acquired company in a way that enhances the performance of our combined businesses or product lineslines. Transactions such as acquisitions have resulted, and may in the future result, in unexpected significant costs and expenses. In the future, we may be required to realizerecord charges to earnings during the period if we determine there is an impairment of goodwill or intangible assets, up to the full amount of the value from expected synergies.of the assets. In addition, acquisitions and strategic alliances may require us to integrate a different company culture, management team and business infrastructure. Depending on the size and complexity of an acquisition, our successful integration of the entity depends on a variety of factors, including:
including introducing new products and meeting revenue targets as expected, the retention of key employees;
the management of facilitiesemployees and employees in different geographic areas;
the retention of key customers;
the compatibility of our sales programs and facilities with those of the acquired company; and
the compatibility of our existing infrastructure with that of an acquired company.customers.
In addition, effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial reports and to effectively
prevent fraud. The integration of acquired businesses is likely to result in our systems and internal controls becoming increasingly complex and more difficult to manage. We devote significant resources and time to comply with the internal control over financial reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. However, we cannot be certain that these measures will ensure that we design, implement and maintain adequate control over our financial processes and reporting in the future, especially in the context of acquisitions of other businesses. Any difficulties in the assimilation of acquired businesses into our control system could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock and our access to capital.
A successful divestiture depends on various factors, including our ability to:
to effectively transfer liabilities, contracts, facilities and employees to the purchaser;
purchaser, identify and separate the intellectual property to be divested from the intellectual property that we wish to keep;keep and
reduce fixed costs previously associated with the divested assets or business.
In addition, if customers of the divested business do not receive the same level of service from the new owners, this may adversely affect our other businesses to the extent that these customers also purchase other Agilent products. All of these efforts require varying levels of management resources, which may divert our attention from other business operations. Further, if market conditions or other factors lead us to change our strategic direction, we may not realize the expected value from such transactions. If we do not realize the expected benefits or synergies of such transactions, our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows and stock price could be negatively impacted.
If we dofail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not achievebe able to accurately report our financial results, which could lead to a loss of investor confidence in our financial statements and have an adverse effect on our stock price.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial statements and to effectively prevent fraud. We devote significant resources and time to comply with the contemplated benefitsinternal control over financial reporting requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. As further described in Part II Item 9A “Controls and Procedures.” management has concluded that, because of a material weakness in accounting for income taxes, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of October 31, 2015. The Company has and will continue to enhance its controls and expects to remediate the material weakness. However, we cannot be certain that these measures will be successful or that we will be able to prevent future significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. Inadequate internal controls could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on investor confidence in our financial statements, the trading price of our acquisitionstock and our access to capital.
Integrating Dako A/S may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected and our business and financial condition may be materially impaired.
We may not achieve the desired benefits from our acquisition and integration of Dako. In addition, the operation of Dako within Agilent couldmay be a difficult, costly and time-consuming process that involves a number of risks, including, but not limited to:
our response to significant competitive pressure;
difficulties in meeting new product timelines;
the ability to grow in emerging markets;
increased exposure to certain governmental regulations and compliance requirements;
increased costs to address certain governmental regulations and compliance issues, such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) warning letter received in August 2013 which has now been lifted by the FDA;
increased costs and use of resources; and
difficulties in the assimilation of different corporate cultures, practices and sales and distribution methodologies, as well as in the assimilation and retention of geographically dispersed, decentralized operations and personnel;personnel.
the potential loss of key personnel who choose not to remain with Dako or Agilent;
the potential loss of key customers or suppliers who choose not to do business with the combined business; and
the use of cash resources and increased capital expenditures on additional investment or research and development activities in excess of our current expectations, which could offset any synergies resulting from the Dako acquisition and limit other potential uses of our cash, including stock repurchases and retirement of outstanding debt.
Even if we are able to successfully operate Dako within Agilent, we may not be able to realize the revenue and other synergies and growth that we anticipateanticipated from the acquisition in the time frame that we currently expect,expected, and the costs of achieving these benefits may be higher than what we currently expect, because of a number of risks, including, but not limited to:
the possibility that the acquisition may not further our business strategy as we expected;
the possibility that we may not be able to expand the reach and customer base for Dako current and future products as expected;
the possibility that we may not be able to expand the reach and customer base for Agilent products as expected;
the possibility that the carrying amounts of goodwill and other purchased intangible assets may not be recoverable;
and
the fact that the acquisition will substantially expand our diagnostics business, and we may not experience anticipated growth in that market.
expected. As a result, of these risks, the Dako acquisition and integration may not contribute to our earnings as expected, we may not achieve expected revenue synergies or our return on invested capitaloperating margin targets when expected, or at all, and we may not achieve the other anticipated strategic and financial benefits of this transaction.
The impact of consolidation and acquisitions of competitors is difficult to predict and may harm our business.
The electronic measurement and life sciences industries are intensely competitive and have been subject to increasing consolidation. For instance, Danaher Corporation completed its acquisitions of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in June 2011 and IRIS
International in November 2012; Thermo Fisher Scientific completed its acquisitions of Phadia in August 2011, Doe & Ingalls in May 2012, and One Lambda in September 2012; and PerkinElmer completed its acquisitions of Haoyuan Biotech in November 2012 and Caliper Life Sciences in November 2011. Consolidation in our industries could result in existing competitors increasing their market share through business combinations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to compete successfully in increasingly consolidated industries and cannot predict with certainty how industry consolidation will affect our competitors or us.
Environmental contamination from past operations could subject us to unreimbursed costs and could harm on-site operations and the future use and value of the properties involved and environmental contamination caused by ongoing operations could subject us to substantial liabilities in the future.
Some of our properties are undergoing remediation by the Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") for subsurface contaminations that were known at the time of our separation from HP. HP has agreed to retain the liability for this subsurface contamination, perform the required remediation and indemnify us with respect to claims arising out of that contamination. HP will have access to our properties to perform remediation. While HP has agreed to minimize interference with on-site operations at those properties, remediation activities and subsurface contamination may require us to incur unreimbursed costs and could harm on-site operations and the future use and value of the properties. We cannot be sure that HP will continue to fulfill its indemnification or remediation obligations. In addition, the determination of the existence and cost of any additional contamination caused by us could involve costly and time-consuming negotiations and litigation.
We have agreed to indemnify HP for any liability associated with contamination from past operations at all other properties transferred from HP to us, other than those properties currently undergoing remediation by HP. While we are not aware of any material liabilities associated with any potential subsurface contamination at any of those properties, subsurface contamination may exist, and we may be exposed to material liability as a result of the existence of that contamination.
Our current and historical manufacturing processes involve, or have involved, the use of substances regulated under various international, federal, state and local laws governing the environment. As a result, we may become subject to liabilities for environmental contamination, and these liabilities may be substantial. While we have divested substantially all of our semiconductor related businesses to Avago and Verigy and regardless of indemnification arrangements with those parties, we may still become subject to liabilities for historical environmental contamination related to those businesses. Although our policy is to apply strict standards for environmental protection at our sites inside and outside the U.S., even if the sites outside the U.S. are not subject to regulations imposed by foreign governments, we may not be aware of all conditions that could subject us to liability.
As part of our acquisition of Varian, we assumed the liabilities of Varian, including Varian's costs and potential liabilities for environmental matters. One such cost is our obligation, along with the obligation of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. ("VSEA") (under the terms of a Distribution Agreement between Varian, VSEA and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("VMS")) to each indemnify VMS for one-third of certain costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs) relating to (a) environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities at certain facilities previously operated by Varian Associates, Inc. ("VAI") and third-party claims made in connection with environmental conditions at those facilities, and (b) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or third-party claims alleging that VAI or VMS is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA") in connection with certain sites to which VAI allegedly shipped manufacturing waste for recycling, treatment or disposal (the "CERCLA sites"). With respect to the facilities formerly operated by VAI, VMS is overseeing the environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities, in most cases under the direction of, or in consultation with, federal, state and/or local agencies, and handling third-party claims. VMS is also handling claims relating to the CERCLA sites. Although any ultimate liability arising from environmental- related matters could result in significant expenditures that, if aggregated and assumed to occur within a single fiscal year, could be material to our financial statements, the likelihood of such occurrence is considered remote. Based on information currently available and our best assessment of the ultimate amount and timing of environmental-related events, management believes that the costs of environmental-related matters are unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our customers and we are subject to various governmental regulations, compliance with whichor changes in such regulations may cause us to incur significant expenses, and if we fail to maintain satisfactory compliance with certain regulations, we may be forced to recall products and cease their manufacture and distribution, and we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
Our businessescustomers and we are subject to various significant international, federal, state and local regulations, including but not limited to health and safety, packaging, product content, labor and import/export regulations. These regulations are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. We may be required to incur significant expenses to comply with these regulations or to remedy violations of these regulations. Any failure by us to comply with applicable government regulations
could also result in cessation of our operations or portions of our operations, product recalls or impositions of fines and restrictions on our ability to carry on or expand our operations. In addition, because many of our products are regulated or sold into regulated industries, we must comply with additional regulations in marketing our products. We develop, configure and market our products to meet customer needs created by these regulations. Any significant change in these regulations could reduce demand for our products, force us to modify our products to comply with new regulations or increase our costs of producing these products. If demand for our products is adversely affected or our costs increase, our business would suffer.
Our products and operations are also often subject to the rules of industrial standards bodies, like the International Standards Organization, as well as regulation by other agencies such as the U.S. Federal Communications Commission.United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). We also must comply with work safety rules. If we fail to adequately address any of these regulations, our businesses could be harmed.
We are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and certain similar foreign regulatory agencies, and failure to comply with such regulations could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
A number of our products are subject to regulation by the FDA and certain similar foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, a number of our products may be in the future subject to regulation by the FDA and certain similar foreign regulatory agencies. These regulations govern a wide variety of product related activities, from quality management, design and development to labeling, manufacturing, promotion, sales and distribution. If we or any of our suppliers or distributors fail to comply with FDA and other applicable regulatory requirements or are perceived to potentially have failed to comply, we may face, among other things, warning letters, adverse publicity affecting both us and our customers; investigations or notices of non-compliance, fines, injunctions, and civil penalties; import or export restrictions; partial suspensions or total shutdown of production facilities or the imposition of operating restrictions; increased difficulty in obtaining required FDA clearances or approvals or foreign equivalents; seizures or recalls of our products or those of our customers; or the inability to sell our products. Any such FDA actions could disrupt our business and operations, lead to significant remedial costs and have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Some of our chemical analysisproducts are exposed to particular complex regulations such as regulations of toxic substances and failure to comply with such regulations could harm our business.
Some of our products and related consumables marked by our chemical analysis and life sciences businesses are used in conjunction with chemicals whose manufacture, processing, distribution and notification requirements are regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) under the Toxic Substances Control Act, and by regulatory bodies in other countries with similar laws. The Toxic Substances Control Act regulations govern, among other things, the testing, manufacture, processing and distribution of chemicals, the testing of regulated chemicals for their effects on human health and safety and import and export of chemicals. The Toxic Substances Control Act prohibits persons from manufacturing any chemical in the U.S. that has not been reviewed by EPA for its effect on health and safety, and placed on an EPA inventory of chemical substances. We must conformensure conformance of the manufacturing, processing, distribution of and notification about these chemicals to these laws and adapt to regulatory requirements in all applicable countries as these requirements change. If we fail to comply with the notification, record-keeping and other requirements in the manufacture or distribution of our products, , then we could be made to pay civil penalties, face criminal prosecution and, in some cases, be prohibited from distributing or marketing our products until the products or component substances are brought into compliance.
A number of our products from our life sciences, chemical analysis and diagnostics and genomics businesses are subject to regulation by the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and certain similar foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, a number of our products may be in the future subject to regulation by the FDA and certain similar foreign regulatory agencies. As such, we continually invest in our manufacturing infrastructure to gain and maintain certifications necessary for the level of clearance. Our pathology manufacturing facilities in Denmark and California have established quality management systems and manufacturing practices designed to comply with the adequate standards for the in vitro diagnostics industry, including ISO 13485 Medical devices and FDA 21CFR Part 820 quality system regulation as well as additional international standards. Our genomics Cedar Creek, Texas manufacturing facility has been registered with the FDA as a medical device manufacturing facility. This FDA registered facility is the site where our class I ASR SureFISH products are manufactured. Additionally, other facilities maintain ISO 13485 manufacturing compliance. If we or any of our suppliers or distributors fail to comply with FDA and other applicable regulatory requirements or are perceived to potentially have failed to comply, we may face, among other things, adverse publicity affecting both us and our customers, investigations or notices of non-compliance, fines, injunctions, and civil penalties; partial suspensions or total shutdown of production facilities or the imposition of operating restrictions; increased difficulty in obtaining required FDA clearances or approvals; seizures or recalls of our products or those of our customers; or the inability to sell our products.
Our business may suffer if we fail to comply with government contracting laws and regulations.
We derive a portion of our revenues from direct and indirect sales to U.S., state, local, and foreign governments and their respective agencies. Such contracts are subject to various procurement laws and regulations, and contract provisions relating to their formation, administration and performance. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations or provisions in our government contracts could result in the imposition of various civil and criminal penalties, termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, or suspension from future government contracting. If our government contracts are terminated, if we are suspended from government work, or if our ability to compete for new contracts is adversely affected, our business could suffer.
Our retirement and post retirement pension plans are subject to financial market risks that could adversely affect our future results of operations and cash flows.
We have significant retirement and post retirement pension plans assets and obligations. The performance of the financial markets and interest rates impact our plan expenses and funding obligations. Significant decreases in market interest rates, decreases in the fair value of plan assets and investment losses on plan assets will increase our funding obligations, and adversely impact our results of operations and cash flows.
The impact of consolidation and acquisitions of competitors is difficult to predict and may harm our business.
The life sciences industry is intensely competitive and has been subject to increasing consolidation. Consolidation in our industries could result in existing competitors increasing their market share through business combinations and result in stronger competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to compete successfully in increasingly consolidated industries and cannot predict with certainty how industry consolidation will affect our competitors or us.
If we are unable to successfully manage the consolidation and streamlining of our manufacturing operations, we may not achieve desired efficiencies and our ability to deliver products to our customers could be disrupted.
Although we utilize manufacturing facilities throughout the world, we have been consolidating, and may continue to consolidate, our manufacturing operations to certain of our plants to achieve efficiencies and gross margin improvements. Additionally, we typically consolidate the production of products from our acquisitions into our supply chain and manufacturing processes, which are technically complex and require expertise to operate. If we are unable to establish processes to efficiently and effectively produce high quality products in the consolidated locations, we may not achieve the anticipated synergies and production may be disrupted, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our operating results may suffer if our manufacturing capacity does not match the demand for our products.
Because we cannot immediately adapt our production capacity and related cost structures to rapidly changing market conditions, when demand does not meet our expectations, our manufacturing capacity will likely exceed our production requirements. If, during a general market upturn or an upturn in one of our segments, we cannot increase our manufacturing capacity to meet product demand, we will not be able to fulfill orders in a timely manner which could lead to order cancellations, contract breaches or indemnification obligations. This inability could materially and adversely limit our ability to improve our
results. By contrast, if during an economic downturn we had excess manufacturing capacity, then our fixed costs associated with excess manufacturing capacity would adversely affect our income, margins, and operating results.
Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing other portions of our supply chain including logistics services, may adversely affect our ability to bring products to market and damage our reputation. Dependence on outsourced information technology and other administrative functions may impair our ability to operate effectively.
As part of our efforts to streamline operations and to cut costs, we outsource aspects of our manufacturing processes and other functions and continue to evaluate additional outsourcing. If our contract manufacturers or other outsourcers fail to perform their obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. For example, during a market upturn, our contract manufacturers may be unable to meet our demand requirements, which may preclude us from fulfilling our customers' orders on a timely basis. The ability of these manufacturers to perform is largely outside of our control. Additionally, changing or replacing our contract manufacturers, logistics providers or other outsourcers could cause disruptions or delays. In addition, we outsource significant portions of our information technology ("IT") and other administrative functions. Since IT is critical to our operations, any failure to perform on the part of our IT providers could impair our ability to operate effectively. In addition to the risks outlined above, problems with manufacturing or IT outsourcing could result in lower revenues, unexecuted efficiencies, and impact our results of operations and our stock price. Much of our outsourcing takes place in developing countries and, as a result, may be subject to geopolitical uncertainty.
Environmental contamination from past operations could subject us to unreimbursed costs and could harm on-site operations and the future use and value of the properties involved and environmental contamination caused by ongoing operations could subject us to substantial liabilities in the future.
Certain properties transferred to Keysight as part of the separation are undergoing remediation by HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company) (together "HP") for subsurface contaminations that were known at the time of our separation from HP. HP has agreed to retain the liability for this subsurface contamination, perform the required remediation and indemnify Keysight with respect to claims arising out of that contamination. HP will have access to those Keysight properties to perform remediation. While HP has agreed to minimize interference with on-site operations at those properties, remediation activities and subsurface contamination may require Keysight to incur unreimbursed costs and could harm on-site operations and the future use and value of the properties. We cannot be sure that Keysight will not seek additional reimbursement from us for that interference or unreimbursed costs. We cannot be sure that HP will continue to fulfill its indemnification or remediation obligations, in which case Keysight may seek indemnification from us. In addition, the determination of the existence and cost of any additional contamination caused by us prior to the separation could involve costly and time-consuming negotiations and litigation.
Other than those properties currently undergoing remediation by HP, we have agreed to indemnify HP, with respect to any liability associated with contamination from past operations, and Keysight, with respect to any liability associated with contamination prior to the separation, at, respectively, properties transferred from HP to us and properties transferred by us to Keysight. While we are not aware of any material liabilities associated with any potential subsurface contamination at any of those properties, subsurface contamination may exist, and we may be exposed to material liability as a result of the existence of that contamination.
Our current and historical manufacturing processes involve, or have involved, the use of substances regulated under various international, federal, state and local laws governing the environment. As a result, we may become subject to liabilities for environmental contamination, and these liabilities may be substantial. While we have divested substantially all of our semiconductor related businesses to Avago and Advantest Corporation and regardless of indemnification arrangements with those parties, we may still become subject to liabilities for historical environmental contamination related to those businesses. Although our policy is to apply strict standards for environmental protection at our sites inside and outside the U.S., even if the sites outside the U.S. are not subject to regulations imposed by foreign governments, we may not be aware of all conditions that could subject us to liability.
As part of our acquisition of Varian, we assumed the liabilities of Varian, including Varian's costs and potential liabilities for environmental matters. One such cost is our obligation, along with the obligation of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. ("VSEA") (under the terms of a Distribution Agreement between Varian, VSEA and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("VMS")) to each indemnify VMS for one-third of certain costs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds and tax benefits recognized or realized by VMS for such costs) relating to (a) environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities at certain facilities previously operated by Varian Associates, Inc. ("VAI") and third-party claims made in connection with environmental conditions at those facilities, and (b) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or third-party claims alleging that VAI or VMS is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of
1980, as amended ("CERCLA") in connection with certain sites to which VAI allegedly shipped manufacturing waste for recycling, treatment or disposal (the "CERCLA sites"). With respect to the facilities formerly operated by VAI, VMS is overseeing the environmental investigation, monitoring and/or remediation activities, in most cases under the direction of, or in consultation with, federal, state and/or local agencies, and handling third-party claims. VMS is also handling claims relating to the CERCLA sites. Although any ultimate liability arising from environmental- related matters could result in significant expenditures that, if aggregated and assumed to occur within a single fiscal year, could be material to our financial statements, the likelihood of such occurrence is considered remote. Based on information currently available and our best assessment of the ultimate amount and timing of environmental-related events, management believes that the costs of environmental-related matters are unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.
In August 2012, the SEC adopted a new rule requiring disclosures by public companies of specified minerals, known as conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. The rule, which went into effect for calendar year 2013 and requires an annual disclosure report to be filed with the SEC by May 31st of each year, requires companies to perform due diligence, disclose and report whether or not such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo or an adjoining country. There are costs associated with complying with these disclosure requirements, including for diligence in regards to the sources of any conflict minerals used in our products, in addition to the cost of remediation and other changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. In addition, our ongoing implementation of these rules could adversely affect the sourcing, supply, and pricing of materials used in our products. The rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including tin, tantalum, gold and tungsten. The number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals may be limited. In addition, there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to the due diligence process of determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. As our supply chain is complex and we use contract manufacturers for some of our products, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. We may also encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict-free, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so.
Third parties may claim that we are infringing their intellectual property and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling products or services.
From time to time, third parties may claim that one or more of our products or services infringe their intellectual property rights. We analyze and take action in response to such claims on a case by case basis. Any dispute or litigation regarding patents
or other intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming due to the complexity of our technology and the uncertainty of intellectual property litigation and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. A claim of intellectual property infringement could force us to enter into a costly or restrictive license agreement, which might not be available under acceptable terms or at all, could require us to redesign our products, which would be costly and time-consuming, and/or could subject us to significant damages or to an injunction against development and sale of certain of our products or services. Our intellectual property portfolio may not be useful in asserting a counterclaim, or negotiating a license, in response to a claim of intellectual property infringement. In certain of our businesses we rely on third party intellectual property licenses and we cannot ensure that these licenses will be available to us in the future on favorable terms or at all.
Third parties may infringe our intellectual property and we may suffer competitive injury or expend significant resources enforcing our rights.
Our success depends in large part on our proprietary technology, including technology we obtained through acquisitions. We rely on various intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, as well as confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements, to establish our proprietary rights. If we do not enforce our intellectual property rights successfully our competitive position may suffer which could harm our operating results.
Our pending patent applications, and our pending copyright and trademark registration applications, may not be allowed or competitors may challenge the validity or scope of our patents, copyrights or trademarks. In addition, our patents, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property rights may not provide us a significant competitive advantage.
We may need to spend significant resources monitoring our intellectual property rights and we may or may not be able to detect infringement by third parties. Our competitive position may be harmed if we cannot detect infringement and enforce our
intellectual property rights quickly or at all. In some circumstances, we may choose to not pursue enforcement because an infringer has a dominant intellectual property position or for other business reasons. In addition, competitors might avoid infringement by designing around our intellectual property rights or by developing non-infringing competing technologies. Intellectual property rights and our ability to enforce them may be unavailable or limited in some countries which could make it easier for competitors to capture market share and could result in lost revenues. Furthermore, some of our intellectual property is licensed to others which allow them to compete with us using that intellectual property.
We are subject to ongoing tax examinations of our tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. An adverse outcome of any such audit or examination by the IRS or other tax authority could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We are subject to ongoing tax examinations of our tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities in various jurisdictions. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from ongoing tax examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. These assessments can require considerable estimates and judgments. Intercompany transactions associated with the sale of inventory, services, intellectual property and cost share arrangements are complex and affect our tax liabilities. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from ongoing tax examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. A difference in the ultimate resolution of tax uncertainties from what is currently estimated could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
If tax incentives change or cease to be in effect, our income taxes could increase significantly.
Agilent benefits from tax incentives extended to its foreign subsidiaries to encourage investment or employment. Several jurisdictions have granted Agilent tax incentives which require renewal at various times in the future. The incentives are conditioned on achieving various thresholds of investments and employment, or specific types of income. Agilent's taxes could increase if the incentives are not renewed upon expiration. If Agilent cannot or does not wish to satisfy all or parts of the tax incentive conditions, we may lose the related tax incentive and could be required to refund tax incentives previously realized. As a result, our effective tax rate could be higher than it would have been had we maintained the benefits of the tax incentives.
We have substantial cash requirements in the United States while most of our cash is generated outside of the United States. The failure to maintain a level of cash sufficient to address our cash requirements in the United States could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Although the cash generated in the United States from our operations coversshould cover our normal operating requirements and debt service requirements, a substantial amount of additional cash is required for special purposes such as the maturity of our debt obligations, including our senior notes coming due in July 2013, our stock repurchase program, our declared dividends and
acquisitions of third parties. Our business operating results, financial condition, and strategic initiatives could be adversely impacted if we were unable to address our U.S. cash requirements through (1) the efficient and timely repatriations of overseas cash or (2) other sources of cash obtained at an acceptable cost.
We have outstanding debt and may incur other debt in the future, which could adversely affect our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We currently have outstanding an aggregate principal amount of $2.25$1.6 billion in senior unsecured notes, and a $44$38 million secured mortgage. We also are a party to a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility which expires in October, 2016 andSeptember 2019. On June 9, 2015, we increased the commitments under which we may borrow up to $400the existing credit facility by $300 million so that the aggregate commitments under the facility now total $700 million and retained a Danish Krone denominatedprovision that allows us to further increase commitments to the credit facility equivalentby $300 million in the aggregate, subject to $9 million.certain conditions. We may borrow additional amounts in the future and use the proceeds from any future borrowing for general corporate purposes, other future acquisitions, expansion of our business or repurchases of our outstanding shares of common stock.
Our incurrence of this debt, and increases in our aggregate levels of debt, may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition by, among other things:
increasing our vulnerability to downturns in our business, to competitive pressures and to adverse economic and industry conditions;
requiring the dedication of an increased portion of our expected cash from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of expected cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures, acquisitions stock repurchases and stock repurchases;dividends; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry.
Our current revolving credit facility imposes restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to create liens on our assets and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur indebtedness, and requires us to maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. Our ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control. In addition, the indenture governing our senior notes contains covenants that may adversely affect our ability to incur certain liens or engage in certain types of sale and leaseback transactions. If we breach any of the covenants and do not obtain a waiver from the lenders, then, subject to applicable cure periods, our outstanding indebtedness could be declared immediately due and payable.
If we suffer a loss to our factories, facilities or distribution system due to catastrophe, our operations could be seriously harmed.
Our factories, facilities and distribution system are subject to catastrophic loss due to fire, flood, terrorism or other natural or man-made disasters. In particular, several of our facilities could be subject to a catastrophic loss caused by earthquake due to their locations. Our production facilities, headquarters and Agilent Technologies Laboratories in California, and our production facilities in Japan, are all located in areas with above-average seismic activity. If any of these facilities were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could disrupt our operations, delay production, shipments and revenue and result in large expenses to repair or replace the facility. If such a disruption were to occur, we could breach agreements, our reputation could be harmed, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, since we have consolidated our manufacturing facilities, we are more likely to experience an interruption to our operations in the event of a catastrophe in any one location. Although we carry insurance for property damage and business interruption, we do not carry insurance or financial reserves for interruptions or potential losses arising from earthquakes or terrorism. Also, our third party insurance coverage will vary from time to time in both type and amount depending on availability, cost and our decisions with respect to risk retention. Economic conditions and uncertainties in global markets may adversely affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain third party insurance. If our third party insurance coverage is adversely affected, or to the extent we have elected to self-insure, we may be at a greater risk that our operations will be harmed by a catastrophic loss.
If we experience a significant disruption in, or breach in security of, our information technology systems, or if we fail to implement new systems and software successfully, our business could be adversely affected.
We rely on several centralized information technology systems throughout our company to provide products and services, keep financial records, process orders, manage inventory, process shipments to customers and operate other critical functions. Our information technology systems may be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to power outages, hardware failures, computer viruses, attacks by computer hackers, telecommunication failures, user errors, catastrophes or other unforeseen events. Our information technology systems also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with system integration, software upgrades or system migration work that takes place from time to time. If we were to experience a prolonged system disruption in the information technology systems that involve our interactions with customers or suppliers, it could result in the loss of sales and customers and significant incremental costs, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, security breaches of our information technology systems could result in
the misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information belonging to us or to our employees, partners, customers or suppliers, which could result in our suffering significant financial or reputational damage.
Adverse conditions in the global banking industry and credit markets may adversely impact the value of our cash investments or impair our liquidity.
As of October 31 2012,2015, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.35$2.0 billion invested or held in a mix of money market funds, time deposit accounts and bank demand deposit accounts. Disruptions in the financial markets may, in some cases, result in an inability to access assets such as money market funds that traditionally have been viewed as highly liquid. Any failure of our counterparty financial institutions or funds in which we have invested may adversely impact our cash and cash equivalent positions and, in turn, our results and financial condition.
We could incur significant liability if the distribution of Keysight common stock to our shareholders is determined to be a taxable transaction.
We have received an opinion from outside tax counsel to the effect that the separation and distribution of Keysight qualifies as a transaction that is described in Sections 355(a) and 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code. The opinion relies on certain facts, assumptions, representations and undertakings from Keysight and us regarding the past and future conduct of the companies’ respective businesses and other matters. If any of these facts, assumptions, representations or undertakings are incorrect or not satisfied, our shareholders and we may not be able to rely on the opinion of tax counsel and could be subject to significant tax liabilities. Notwithstanding the opinion of tax counsel we have received, the IRS could determine on audit that the separation is
taxable if it determines that any of these facts, assumptions, representations or undertakings are not correct or have been violated or if it disagrees with the conclusions in the opinion. If the separation is determined to be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes, our shareholders that are subject to U.S. federal income tax and we could incur significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities.
We may be exposed to claims and liabilities as a result of the separation with Keysight.
We entered into a separation and distribution agreement and various other agreements with Keysight to govern the separation and the relationship of the two companies going forward. These agreements provide for specific indemnity and liability obligations and could lead to disputes between us. The indemnity rights we have against Keysight under the agreements may not be sufficient to protect us. In addition, our indemnity obligations to Keysight may be significant and these risks could negatively affect our financial condition.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
As of October 31, 20122015 we owned or leased a total of approximately 11.15.7 million square feet of space worldwide including the Dako acquisition.worldwide. Of that, we owned approximately 8.64.1 million square feet and leased the remaining 2.51.6 million square feet. Our sales and support facilities occupied a total of approximately 1.40.7 million square feet. Our manufacturing plants, R&D facilities and warehouse and administrative facilities occupied approximately 9.75.0 million square feet. All of our businesses share sales offices throughout the world.
Information about each of our businesses appears below:
Life Sciences Group.& Applied Markets Business. Our life science measurement business has manufacturingsciences and R&D facilities in Singapore, Malaysia, Germany, Poland, U.K. and the U.S.
Chemical Analysis Group. Our chemical analysis measurementapplied markets business has manufacturing and R&D facilities in Australia, China, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Italy, Japan, Netherlands,Singapore, U.K. and the U.S.
Diagnostics &and Genomics GroupBusiness.. Our diagnosticdiagnostics and genomics business has manufacturing and R&D facilities in Denmark, Germany, Malaysia and the U.S.
Electronic Measurement Group.Agilent CrossLab Business. Our electronic measurementAgilent CrossLab business has manufacturing and R&D facilities in China,Australia, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, IndiaNetherlands, U.K. and the U.S.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including, but not limited to, patent, commercial and environmental matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. There are no matters pending that we currently believe are reasonably possible of having a material impact to our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange with the ticker symbol “A”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and the dividend paymentsdeclarations per quarter for the 20112014 and 20122015 fiscal years as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system for the New York Stock Exchange:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2011 | | High | Low | Dividends |
| First Quarter (ended January 31, 2011) | $ | 44.45 |
| $ | 34.38 |
| N/A |
| Second Quarter (ended April 30, 2011) | $ | 50.68 |
| $ | 39.94 |
| N/A |
| Third Quarter (ended July 31, 2011) | $ | 55.33 |
| $ | 41.29 |
| N/A |
| Fourth Quarter (ended October 31, 2011) | $ | 42.78 |
| $ | 28.67 |
| N/A |
| | | | |
| Fiscal 2012 | | High | Low | Dividends |
| First Quarter (ended January 31, 2012) | $ | 44.85 |
| $ | 32.51 |
| N/A |
| Second Quarter (ended April 30, 2012) | $ | 46.28 |
| $ | 39.15 |
| $0.10 |
| Third Quarter (ended July 31, 2012) | $ | 43.27 |
| $ | 35.32 |
| $0.10 |
| Fourth Quarter (ended October 31, 2012) | $ | 40.97 |
| $ | 35.38 |
| $0.10 |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2014 (1) | | High | Low | Dividends |
| First Quarter (ended January 31, 2014) | $ | 61.22 |
| $ | 49.84 |
| $0.132 |
| Second Quarter (ended April 30, 2014) | $ | 60.46 |
| $ | 51.96 |
| $0.132 |
| Third Quarter (ended July 31, 2014) | $ | 59.58 |
| $ | 53.66 |
| $0.132 |
| Fourth Quarter (ended October 31, 2014) | $ | 59.40 |
| $ | 49.80 |
| $0.132 |
| | | | |
| Fiscal 2015 | | High | Low | Dividends |
| First Quarter (ended January 31, 2015) | $ | 42.99 |
| $ | 37.68 |
| $0.10 |
| Second Quarter (ended April 30, 2015) | $ | 43.59 |
| $ | 37.71 |
| $0.10 |
| Third Quarter (ended July 31, 2015) | $ | 42.93 |
| $ | 38.48 |
| $0.10 |
| Fourth Quarter (ended October 31, 2015) | $ | 41.35 |
| $ | 33.12 |
| $0.10 |
| | | | |
(1) The stock prices in the above table on or prior to November 1, 2014, the date of Keysight separation, have not been adjusted for the distribution.
As of December 1, 2012,2015, there were 33,75026,412 common stockholders of record.
We paid our first quarterly dividend on April 25, 2012 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 3, 2012. During fiscal 2012,2015, we issued threefour quarterly dividends each in the amount of $0.10 per share. On November 16, 2012, we announced a dividend in the amount of $0.10 per share payable on January 23, 2013 to the shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2012. All decisions regarding the declaration and payment of dividends are at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be evaluated regularly in light of our financial condition, earnings, growth prospects, funding requirements, applicable law, and any other factors that our Board deems relevant. The information required by this item with respect to equity compensation plans is included under the caption Equity Compensation Plans in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held March 20, 2013,16, 2016, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, and is incorporated herein by reference.
On November 1, 2014, we completed the distribution of the issued and outstanding common stock of Keysight to our shareholders. Agilent shareholders of records as of the close of business on October 22, 2014, the record date for the distribution, received one share of Keysight common stock for every two shares of Agilent common stock held as of the record date. Agilent shareholders received cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Keysight common stock.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The table below summarizes information about the company'sCompany’s purchases, based on trade date; of its equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the quarterly period ended October 31, 2012.2015. The total number of shares of common stock purchased by the companyCompany during the fiscal year ended October 31, 20122015 is 4,500,000.6,471,464 shares.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares of Common Stock Purchased(1) | | Weighted Average Price Paid per Share of Common Stock(3) | | Total Number of Shares of Common Stock Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)(2) | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares of Common Stock that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions)(1)(2) |
| | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | (d) |
Aug. 1, 2015 through
Aug. 31, 2015 | | — |
| | N/A | | — |
| | N/A |
Sep. 1, 2015 through
Sep. 30, 2015 | �� | — |
| | N/A | | — |
| | N/A |
Oct. 1, 2015 through
Oct. 31, 2015 | | — |
| | N/A | | — |
| | N/A |
| Total | | — |
| | N/A | | — |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares of Common Stock Purchased(1) | | Weighted Average Price Paid per Share of Common Stock(2) | | Total Number of Shares of Common Stock Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1) | | Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares of Common Stock that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions) |
| | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | (d) |
Aug. 1, 2012 through
Aug. 31, 2012 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | NA |
Sep. 1, 2012 through
Sep. 30, 2012 | | 500,000 |
| | 38.49 |
| | 500,000 |
| | NA |
Oct. 1, 2012 through
Oct. 31, 2012 | | 2,000,000 |
| | $ | 37.53 |
| | 2,000,000 |
| | NA |
| Total | | 2,500,000 |
| | $ | 37.72 |
| | 2,500,000 |
| | |
| |
| (1) | On November 19, 200922, 2013 we announced that our Boardboard of Directors approveddirectors had authorized a share repurchase program. The existing program is designed to reduce or eliminate dilution of basic outstanding shares in connection with issuancesresulting from issuance of stock under the company's employee equity incentive plans.programs to target maintaining a weighted average share count of approximately 335 million diluted shares. The share repurchaseexisting program does not require the company to acquire a specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. There is no fixed termination date for the share repurchase program. |
| |
| (2) | On May 28, 2015 we announced that our board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program (the "2015 Repurchase Program"). The 2015 Repurchase Program authorizes the purchase of up to $1.14 billion of the company's common stock through and including November 1, 2018. The 2015 Repurchase Program will commence at the option of the company, on either (1) November 1, 2015 or (2) the date in which we complete the purchase of $365 million of common stock under the existing share repurchase program in fiscal 2015. Upon commencement, the 2015 Repurchase Program replaces our existing share repurchase program. The 2015 Repurchase Program does not require the company to acquire a specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. |
| |
| (3) | The weighted average price paid per share of common stock does not include the cost of commissions. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| | (in millions, except per share data) |
| Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 6,858 |
| | $ | 6,615 |
| | $ | 5,444 |
| | $ | 4,481 |
| | $ | 5,774 |
|
| Income before taxes | $ | 1,043 |
| | $ | 1,032 |
| | $ | 692 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 815 |
|
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,153 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
| | $ | 684 |
| | $ | (31 | ) | | $ | 693 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share — Basic: | $ | 3.31 |
| | $ | 2.92 |
| | $ | 1.97 |
| | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | 1.91 |
|
| Net income (loss) per share — Diluted: | $ | 3.27 |
| | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
| | $ | (0.09 | ) | | $ | 1.87 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share | 348 |
| | 347 |
| | 347 |
| | 346 |
| | 363 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share | 353 |
| | 355 |
| | 353 |
| | 346 |
| | 371 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.30 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) | | 2013 (As Revised) | | 2012 (As Revised) | | 2011 (As Revised) |
| | (in millions, except per share data) |
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data (3): | | | | | | | (1) | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 4,038 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
| | $ | 3,894 |
| | $ | 3,543 |
| | $ | 3,299 |
|
| Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 480 |
| | $ | 229 |
| | $ | 293 |
| | $ | 237 |
| | $ | 232 |
|
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 438 |
| | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 225 |
| | $ | 353 |
| | $ | 252 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 509 |
| | $ | 775 |
| | $ | 776 |
|
| Net income | $ | 401 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 734 |
| | $ | 1,128 |
| | $ | 1,028 |
|
| Net income per share — basic: | | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (0.12 | ) | | 0.95 |
| | 1.49 |
| | 2.23 |
| | 2.24 |
|
| Net income per share - basic | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 2.15 |
| | $ | 3.24 |
| | $ | 2.97 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted: | | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 1.00 |
| | $ | 0.71 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (0.11 | ) | | 0.93 |
| | 1.48 |
| | 2.20 |
| | 2.19 |
|
| Net income per share - diluted | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.62 |
| | $ | 2.13 |
| | $ | 3.20 |
| | $ | 2.90 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing basic net income per share | 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 341 |
| | 348 |
| | 347 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net income per share | 335 |
| | 338 |
| | 345 |
| | 353 |
| | 355 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.400 |
| | $ | 0.528 |
| | 0.460 |
| | $ | 0.300 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2008 |
| | (in millions) |
| Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | (2) | | | | (1) | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ | 2,351 |
| | $ | 3,527 |
| | $ | 2,649 |
| | $ | 2,493 |
| | $ | 1,429 |
|
| Working capital | $ | 2,736 |
| | $ | 3,732 |
| | $ | 3,086 |
| | $ | 2,838 |
| | $ | 1,852 |
|
| Long-term restricted cash and cash equivalents | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,566 |
| | $ | 1,582 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 10,536 |
| | $ | 9,057 |
| | $ | 9,696 |
| | $ | 7,612 |
| | $ | 7,007 |
|
| Long-term debt | $ | 2,112 |
| | $ | 1,932 |
| | $ | 2,190 |
| | $ | 2,904 |
| | $ | 2,125 |
|
| Stockholders' equity | $ | 5,182 |
| | $ | 4,308 |
| | $ | 3,228 |
| | $ | 2,506 |
| | $ | 2,559 |
|
(1) Consolidated financial data includes Varian, acquired on May 14, 2010.
(2) Consolidated financial data includes Dako, acquired on June 21, 2012 and non-recurring tax benefit relating to the reversal of U.S. valuation allowance.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) | | 2013 (As Revised) | | 2012 (As Revised) | | 2011 (As Revised) |
| | (in millions) |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (3): | | | (2) | | (2) | | (1)(2) | | (2) |
| Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments | $ | 2,003 |
| | $ | 2,218 |
| | $ | 2,675 |
| | $ | 2,351 |
| | $ | 3,527 |
|
| Working capital | $ | 2,710 |
| | $ | 3,817 |
| | $ | 3,392 |
| | $ | 2,775 |
| | $ | 3,732 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 7,479 |
| | $ | 10,815 |
| | $ | 10,608 |
| | $ | 10,439 |
| | $ | 9,049 |
|
| Long-term debt | $ | 1,655 |
| | $ | 1,663 |
| | $ | 2,699 |
| | $ | 2,112 |
| | $ | 1,932 |
|
| Stockholders' equity | $ | 4,167 |
| | $ | 5,301 |
| | $ | 5,297 |
| | $ | 5,183 |
| | $ | 4,346 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| (1) Consolidated financial data includes Dako, acquired on June 21, 2012 and a non-recurring tax benefit relating to the reversal of U.S. valuation allowance of $280 million. |
| (2) The above consolidated balance sheet includes Keysight which is presented as a discontinued operation until October 31, 2014. See Note 4, "Discontinued Operations" for additional information. |
(3) We made adjustments to correct immaterial misstatements within this selected financial data. For a detailed explanation of these adjustments, please refer to Note 2, "Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements". These adjustments also affected years 2012 and 2011. There was a $17 million decrease of income from continuing operations and $8 million decrease of income from discontinued operations, net of taxes in 2012. In addition, there was a $20 million increase of income from continuing operations and $4 million decrease of income from discontinued operations, net of taxes in 2011. Working Capital increased $11 million, $39 million and zero as of October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively with total assets decreasing $78 million, $97 million and $8 million as of October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stockholders’ Equity increased $38 million as of October 31, 2011.
|
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This report contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements regarding trends, seasonality cyclicality and growth in, and drivers of, the markets we sell into, our strategic direction, our future effective tax rate and tax valuation allowance, earnings from our foreign subsidiaries, lease and site service income from Keysight, the impact of foreign currency movements on our performance, remediation activities, indemnification, new product and service introductions, the ability of our products to meet market needs, adoption of our products, changes to our manufacturing processes, the use of contract manufacturers and out sourcing, source and supply of materials used in our products, the impact of local government regulations on our ability to pay vendors or conduct operations, our liquidity position, our ability to generate cash from operations, growth in our businesses, our investments, the potential impact of adopting new accounting pronouncements, our financial results, our operating margin, our sales, our purchase commitments, our capital expenditures, our contributions to our pension plans, the selection of discount rates and recognition of any gains or losses for our benefit plans,strategic initiatives, our cost-control activities, timing of completion of our restructuring programs, timing of savings and headcount reduction recognized from our restructuring programs and other cost saving initiatives, continuation of service support to the NMR installed base, uncertainties relating to Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") and other regulatory approvals, the integration of our acquisitions and other transactions, impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, remediation of our material weakness, our stock repurchase program, our declared dividends, our transition to lower-cost regions, and the existence of economic instability, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to various factors, including those discussed in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview and Executive Summary
Agilent Technologies Inc. ("we", "Agilent" or the "company"), incorporated in Delaware in May 1999, is a global leader in life sciences, diagnostics and applied chemical markets, providing application focused solutions that includes instruments, software, services and consumables for the world's premier measurement company, providing core bio-analyticalentire laboratory workflow.
On November 1, 2014, we completed the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Keysight Technologies, Inc. ("Keysight") to Agilent stockholders who received one share of Keysight common stock for every two shares of Agilent held as of the close of business on the record date, October 22, 2014. The historical results of operations and electronic measurementthe financial position of Keysight are included in the consolidated financial statements of Agilent and are reported as discontinued operations within this Form 10-K. For additional information see Note 4, "Discontinued Operations".
The results from operations presented within management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are reported for the continuing operations of Agilent. Income taxes are presented on a revised basis for prior periods see Note 2, " Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements".
In November 2014, we announced a change in organizational structure designed to better serve our customers. Our life sciences business, excluding the nucleic acid solutions division, together with the chemical analysis business combined to form a new segment called life sciences and applied markets business. Our diagnostics and genomics businesses combined with the nucleic acid solutions division from our life sciences business and became the diagnostics and genomics segment. Finally, the Agilent CrossLab segment was formed from the services and consumables businesses previously part of the life sciences and chemical analysis diagnosticsbusinesses. Financial reporting under this new structure is included within this report on Form 10-K and genomics, communications and electronics industries. Our fiscal year end is October 31. Unless otherwise stated, all years and dates referhistorical financial segment information has been recast to conform to this new presentation within our financial statements.
On April 30, 2015 we announced that we have completed an agreement with Rigaku, a privately held scientific instrumentation company headquartered in Tokyo, to acquire Agilent's X-ray diffraction (XRD) business, a key manufacturer of single-crystal X-ray instruments for the global chemical crystallography market. The transaction did not have a material impact to our results of operations, statement of financial position or statement of cash flows in the current or prior fiscal year.periods.
On May 19, 2015 we announced that we have completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Cartagenia, a leading provider of software and services for clinical genetics and molecular pathology laboratories for €60 million. Cartagenia, provides software solutions for variant assessment and reporting of clinical genomics data from next-generation sequencing and microarrays. The Cartagenia Bench platform enables technicians, laboratory directors and clinicians to visualize, assess and report clinical genetics data in the context of patient information.
On November 2, 2015 we announced that we have completed the acquisition of Seahorse Bioscience ("Seahorse"), a leader in providing instruments and assay kits for measuring cell metabolism and bioengergetics for $242 million in cash. Seahorse's
technology enables researchers to better understand cell health, function and signaling, and how the cell may be impacted by the introduction of a specific drug, by providing real-time kinetics to unlock essential cellular bioenergetics data. The financial results of Seahorse will be included within Agilent's from the beginning of the first quarter of 2016.
Agilent's total ordersnet revenue of $4,038 million in 2012 were $6,877 million, an increase of 2 percent2015 was flat when compared to 2011. 2014. Foreign currency movements for 2015 had an unfavorable impact of approximately 6 percentage points compared to 2014. Agilent's net revenue of $4,048 million increased 4 percent in 2014 when compared to 2013.
The increaselife sciences and applied markets business brings together Agilent's analytical laboratory instrumentation and informatics. Revenue decreased 2 percent in orders associated with the Dako acquisition accounted for2015 when compared to 2014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 5 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. In addition, an unfavorable impact on revenue of approximately 2 percentage points of order growth forpoint in 2015 was largely due to the NMR business which we are exiting. For the year ended October 31, 2012 when compared to 2011. Within each2015 and excluding the impact of currency movements and the NMR business, our performance within the life sciences business showed consistent revenue growth from sales to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market partially offset by a decrease in the revenue generated from sales to the life sciences research market. Within applied markets and excluding the impact of currency movements and the NMR business, there was weakness in the chemical analysis and electronic measurement businesses, orders were flatenergy markets in the year ended October 31, 2015 when compared to the prior year. Orders within our diagnosticsRevenue from sales to the life sciences and genomicsapplied markets business increased 442 percent in 2014 when compared to last year and was attributable to the Dako acquisition. Agilent's total orders in 2011 increased 18 percent when compared to 2010. The increase in orders associated with the Varian acquisition less the orders attributable to our divested businesses accounted for 5 percentage points of order growth for2013. For the year ended October 31, 2011 when compared to 2010.
Agilent's net revenue of $6,858 million increased 4 percent when compared to 2011. The revenue increase associated with2014 our performance within the Dako acquisition accounted for approximately 2 percentage points of the revenue increase for the year ended October 31, 2012 when compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of approximately1 percentage point compared to 2011. There was modest growth in demand for life sciences products led by an increase in revenue frombusiness improved with sales to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market but there was alsopartially offset by a corresponding decrease in the revenue generated from the academic and governmentlife sciences research market for the year ended October 31, 2012, when compared to the prior year. Within our chemical analysis businessapplied markets there was revenue grew moderately compared withgrowth from sales to all markets in the prior year. There were modest increases in revenue from the food safety and forensics markets, but environmental and petrochemical markets were relatively flatyear ended October 31, 2014 when compared to the prior year.
The diagnostics and genomics business growth comparedis comprised of three areas of activity. First, we are focused on pathology, companion diagnostics and reagent partnerships. Second, the genomics business includes our arrays, NGS target enrichment and our other genomics solutions. Third, the nucleic acid solutions business manufactures synthetic RNA to the prior year was attributable to the acquisition of Dako. Within electronic measurement, total revenue from general purpose marketsbe potentially used as active pharmaceutical ingredients. Revenue was flat in 20122015 when compared to 2014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 8 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. Excluding the impact of foreign currency movements, growth in revenue from sales to the diagnostics and clinical research market was strong in the year ended October 31, 2015 when compared to the prior year with a modest shortfallyear. Revenue increased 5 percent in revenue from aerospace and defense offset by an increase in revenue from the computer and semi-conductor market. Also within electronic measurement, the communications test business was flat for2014 when compared to 2013. For the year ended October 31, 20122014 our performance within the diagnostics and genomics business improved from sales to the diagnostics and clinical markets when compared to the prior year with wireless manufacturing reporting good revenue growthyear.
The Agilent CrossLab business combines our analytical laboratory services and consumables business. Revenue increased 2 percent in the year offset by a decline in the revenue from the wireless R&D market. Agilent's total net revenue in 2011 increased 22 percent2015 when compared to 2010. The revenue increase associated with the Varian acquisition less the revenue attributable to our divested businesses accounted for 52014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 7 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. Excluding the impact of revenue increase forforeign currency movements there was growth in sales to all key end markets, in particular, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market in the year ended October 31, 20112015 when compared to 2010.last year. Within the applied markets revenue in chemical and energy end markets were slower but still reported growth when adjusted for currency movements. Revenue increased 7 percent in 2014 when compared to 2013. Revenue growth from sales to all markets was similar to that of our life sciences and applied markets business in the year ended October 31, 2014 when compared to last year.
Net income from continuing operations was $1,153$438 million in 20122015 compared to net income from continuing operations of $1,012$232 million and $684$225 million in 20112014 and 2010, respectively. In 2012, 2011 and 2010 we generated operating cash flows of $1,228 million, $1,260 million and $718 million,2013, respectively. As of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 we had cash and cash equivalents balances of $2,351$2,003 million and $3,527$2,218 million, respectively.
On June 21, 2012,November 22, 2013 we completedannounced that our acquisitionboard of Dako A/Sdirectors had authorized a share repurchase program. The existing program is designed to reduce or eliminate dilution resulting from issuance of stock under the company's employee equity incentive programs to target maintaining a weighted average share count of approximately 335 million diluted shares. For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 we repurchased 6 million shares for $267 million, 4 million shares for $200 million and 20 million shares for $900 million, respectively. All such shares and related costs are held as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method. On May 28, 2015 we announced that our board of directors had approved a new share repurchase program (the "2015 repurchase program"). The 2015 share repurchase program authorizes the purchase of up to $1.14 billion of our common stock through and including November 1, 2018. The 2015 share repurchase program will commence, at the acquisition of 100%option of the share capitalcompany, on either November 1, 2015, or the date on which we complete the purchase of Dako A/S,the remaining $98 million for a limited liability company incorporatedtotal of $365 million of common stock in fiscal 2015 under the lawsexisting stock repurchase program. Upon commencement, the 2015 share repurchase program replaces our existing stock repurchase program, which authorized the repurchase of Denmark (“Dako”), under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. Dako provides antibodies, reagents, scientific instruments and software primarilyshares to customers in pathology laboratories. As a result of the acquisition, Dako became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. The consideration paid was approximately $2,143 million, of which $1,400 million was paid directly to the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy thereduce or
outstanding debteliminate share dilution from equity programs. The 2015 repurchase program does not require the company to acquire a specific number of Dako. Agilent funded the acquisition using existing cash. The acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidanceshares and the results of Dako are included in Agilent's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The acquisition of Dako and its portfolio is another step to increase our growth in several rapidly expanding areas of diagnostics, including anatomic pathology and molecular diagnostics, as well as strengthen our existing offerings with a focus on product development to help in the fight against cancer. For additional details related to the acquisition of Dako, see Note 3, "Acquisitions".may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 cash dividends of $133 million, $176 million and $156 million were paid on the company's outstanding common stock, respectively. On November 19, 2015, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.115 per share of common stock, or approximately $38 million which will be paid on January 27, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on January 5, 2016. The timing and amounts of any future dividends are subject to determination and approval by our board of directors.
In 2015 we introduced an improvement initiative to transform a number of the company's operations. These actions produced savings of approximately $40 million in total in 2015.
Looking forward, we believe we have entered a slow-growth environment where continued uncertainty will dampen demand for our products and services. There are improvements to be achieved in operating performance by leveraging our value engineering, purchase power, logistics and manufacturing capabilities. We also have a number of variable cost mechanisms that we are able to use moving forward. We expect to focus on organic growth and expand the operating margin of our businesses. In addition, we anticipate returning a significant proportion of our cash flow to shareholders through our dividend and share repurchase programs. The unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates has decreased revenue by approximately 6 percentage points for the year ended October 31, 2015. Costs and expenses, incurred in local currency, were subject to the favorable effects due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates reducing our overall net exposure. The impact of foreign currency exchange rates movements can be positive or negative in any period and is calculated by applying the prior period foreign currency exchange rates to the current year period.We anticipate that changes in foreign currency exchange rates will continue to introduce innovative technologies and deliver market-leading products, while we make progress in optimizinghave an unfavorable impact on our order fulfillment and manufacturing operations.performance for the near future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the company in the future, actual results may be different from the estimates. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur could materially change the financial statements. Our critical accounting policies are those that affect our financial statements materially and involve difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management. Those policies are revenue recognition, inventory valuation, share-based compensation, retirement and post-retirement plan assumptions, valuation of goodwill and purchased intangible assets, restructuring and accounting for income taxes.
Revenue recognition. We enter into agreements to sell products (hardware or software), services, and other arrangements (multiple element arrangements) that include combinations of products and services. Revenue from product sales, net of trade discounts and allowances, is recognized provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. Revenue is reduced for estimated product returns, when appropriate. For sales that include customer-specified acceptance criteria, revenue is recognized after the acceptance criteria have been met. For products that include installation, if the installation meets the criteria to be considered a separate element, product revenue is recognized upon delivery, and recognition of installation revenue occurs when the installation is complete. Otherwise, neither the product nor the installation revenue is recognized until the installation is complete. Revenue from services is deferred and recognized over the contractual period or as services are rendered and accepted by the customer. We allocate revenue to each element in our multiple-element arrangements based upon their relative selling prices. We determine the selling price for each deliverable based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on our vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available, third-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Revenue from the sale of software products that are not required to deliver the tangible product's essential functionality are accounted for under software revenue recognition rules. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria for that element have been met. The amount of product revenue recognized is affected by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements.
We use VSOE of selling price in the selling price allocation in all instances where it exists. VSOE of selling price for products and services is determined when a substantial majority of the selling prices fall within a reasonable range when sold separately. TPE of selling price can be established by evaluating largely interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone sales to similarly situated customers. As our products contain a significant element of proprietary technology and the solution offered differs substantially from that of competitors, it is difficult to obtain the reliable standalone competitive pricing
necessary to establish TPE. ESP represents the best estimate of the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a standalone basis. We determine ESP for a product or service by using historical selling prices which reflect multiple factors including, but not limited to customer type, geography, market conditions, competitive landscape, gross margin objectives and pricing practices. The determination of ESP is made through consultation with and approval by management. We may modify or develop new pricing practices and strategies in the future. As these pricing strategies evolve wechanges may modify our pricing practices in the future, which may result in changesoccur in ESP. The aforementioned factors may result in a different allocation of revenue to the deliverables in multiple element arrangements, which may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for these elements but will not change the total revenue recognized for the arrangement.
Inventory valuation. We assess the valuation of our inventory on a periodic basis and make adjustments to the value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based upon estimates about future demand and actual usage. Such estimates are difficult to make under most economic conditions. The excess balance determined by this analysis becomes the basis for our excess inventory charge. Our excess inventory review process includes analysis of sales forecasts, managing product rollovers and working with manufacturing to maximize recovery of excess inventory. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional write-downs may be required. If actual market conditions are more favorable than anticipated, inventory previously written down may be sold to customers, resulting in lower cost of sales and higher income from operations than expected in that period. In the fourth quarter of 2014, Agilent announced it is exiting the NMR business, and as a result, recorded an excess inventory charge of $30 million. For the year ended October 31, 2015 additional excess inventory charges were recorded in respect of the exiting of the NMR business of $4 million.
Share-based compensation. We account for share-based awards in accordance with the authoritative guidance. Under the authoritative guidance, share-based compensation expense is primarily based on estimated grant date fair value and is recognized on a straight line basis. The fair value of share-based awards for employee stock option awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Shares granted under the LTPPLong-Term Performance Program ("LTPP") were valued using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The estimated fair value of restricted stock unit awards is determined based on the market price of Agilent's common stock on the date of grant adjusted for expected dividend yield. On January 17, 2012, the company's Board of Directors approved the initiation of quarterly cash dividends to the company's shareholders. The fair value of all the awards granted prior to the declaration of quarterly cash dividend was measured based on an expected dividend yield of 0%. The ESPPEmployee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at 85 percent of the fair market value at the purchase date.
Both the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation fair value models require the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, including the option's expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. TheDue to the separation of Keysight on November 1, 2014, expected volatility for grants of options in 2015 was based on a 5.5 year average historical stock price volatility of a group of our peer companies. We believe our historical volatility prior to the separation of Keysight is no longer relevant. For the grants of options prior to November 1, 2014, the expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using the historical volatility of Agilent'sAgilent’s stock optionoptions over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life.life of 5.8 years. A 10 percent increase in our historical estimated volatility from 3828 percent to 4838 percent for our most recent employee stock option grant would generally increase the value of an award and the associated compensation cost by approximately 2331 percent if no other factors were changed.
In 2010 the expected life of our employee stock options was 4.4 years. In the first quarter of 2011, we revised our estimate of the expected life of our employee stock options from 4.4 to 5.8 years. For the grants awarded under the 2009 stock plan after November 1, 2010, we increased the period available to retirement eligible employees to exercise their options from three years at retirement date to the full contractual term of ten years. In developing our estimated life of our employee stock options of 5.8 years for 2013 to 2014, we considered the historical option exercise behavior of our executive employees who were granted the majority of the options in the annual grants, which we believe is representative of future behavior. There was no change to the expected life of our employee stock options in 2012. See Note 4,5, "Share-based Compensation," to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, changes in assumptions could materially impact our reported financial results.
Retirement and post-retirement benefit plan assumptions. Retirement and post-retirement benefit plan costs are a significant cost of doing business. They represent obligations that will ultimately be settled sometime in the future and therefore are subject to estimation. Pension accounting is intended to reflect the recognition of future benefit costs over the employees' average expected future service to Agilent based on the terms of the plans and investment and funding decisions. To estimate the impact of these future payments and our decisions concerning funding of these obligations, we are required to make assumptions using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Two critical assumptions are the discount rate and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Other important assumptions include, expected future salary increases, expected future increases to benefit payments, expected retirement dates, employee turnover, retiree mortality rates, and portfolio composition. We evaluate these assumptions at least annually.
The discount rate is used to determine the present value of future benefit payments at the measurement date - October 31
for both U.S. and non-U.S. plans. For 20122014 and 2011,2015, the U.S. discount rates were based on the results of matching expected plan benefit payments with cash flows from a hypothetically constructed bond portfolio and decreased in 2012portfolio. In 2015, discount rates for the U.S. Plans remained relatively flat from the previous year. For 20122015 and 2011,2014, the discount rate for non-U.S. plans was generally based on published rates for high quality corporate bonds and eitherin 2015, remained unchangedthe same or decreased.decreased from the previous year. If we changed our discount rate by 1 percent, the impact would be $5 million on U.S. pension expense and $12 million on non-U.S. pension expense. Lower discount rates increase present values and subsequent year pension expense; higher discount rates decrease present values and subsequent year pension expense.
The company uses alternate methods of amortization as allowed by the authoritative guidance which amortizes the actuarial gains and losses on a consistent basis for the years presented. For U.S. Plans, gains and losses are amortized over the average future working lifetime. For most Non-U.S. Plans and U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans, gains and losses are amortized using
a separate layer for each year's gains and losses. The expected long-term return on plan assets is estimated using current and expected asset allocations as well as historical and expected returns. Plan assets are valued at fair value. If we changed our estimated return on assets by 1 percent, the impact would be $6$3 million on U.S. pension expense and $17$8 million on non-U.S. pension expense. For 2015, actual return on assets was below expectations which, along with contributions during the year, increased next year’s pension cost as well as resulting in a degradation of the funded status at year end. The net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs recorded in continuing operations excluding curtailments and settlements were $52$26 million in 2012, $582015, $15 million in 2011,2014, and $82$36 million in 2010.2013.
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets.Purchased Intangible Assets. Agilent reviews goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. As defined inUnder the authoritative guidance a reporting unit is an operating segment, or one level below an operating segment. We aggregated components of an operating segment thatwe have similar economic characteristics into our reporting units. At the time of an acquisition, we assign goodwill to the reporting unit that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Subsequent to October 31, 2011, we formed a fourth segment, diagnostics and genomics, from a portion of our life sciences segment. As a result, Agilent now has four segments, life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement, which are the same as our reporting units
In September 2011, the FASB approved changes to the goodwill impairment guidance which are intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual impairment test. The changes provide entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The revisedaccounting standard gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether performing the current two-step test is necessary. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. >greater than 50% chance) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test will be required. Otherwise, no further testing will be required.
The revised guidance includes examples of events and circumstances that might indicate that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount. These include macro-economic conditions such as deterioration in the entity's operating environment or industry or market considerations; entity-specific events such as increasing costs, declining financial performance, or loss of key personnel; or other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or a sustained decrease in the stock price on either an absolute basis or relative to peers.
The qualitative indicators replace those previously used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required. Agilent opted to early adopt this guidance for the year ended October 31, 2011.
If it is determined, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the provisions of authoritative guidance require that we perform a two-step impairment test on goodwill. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The second step (if necessary) measures the amount of impairment by applying fair-value-based tests to the individual assets and liabilities within each reporting unit. As defined in the authoritative guidance, a reporting unit is an operating segment, or one level below an operating segment. We aggregate components of an operating segment that have similar economic characteristics into our reporting units.
In fiscal year 2012,2015, we assessed goodwill impairment for our fourthree reporting units;units which consisted of three segments: life sciences chemical analysis,and applied markets, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement. Based on our results of our qualitativeAgilent CrossLab. Due to the new segment structure in November 2014 we performed a quantitative test for goodwill impairment byof the three reporting unit,units, as of September 30, 2012, we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that2015. Based on the results of our testing, the fair value of each of our fourthese reporting units life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement, isare greater than their respective carrying values. There was no impairment of goodwill during the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. Each quarter we review the events and circumstances to determine if goodwill impairment is indicated. There was no impairment of goodwill during the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Purchased intangible assets consist primarily of acquired developed technologies, proprietary know-how, trademarks, and customer relationships and are amortized using the best estimate of the asset's useful life that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed or used up or a straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 6 months to 15 years. In-process research and development (IPR&D)("IPR&D") is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter. When the IPR&D project is complete, it is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and is amortized over its estimated useful life. If an IPR&D project is abandoned, Agilent will record a charge for the value of the related intangible asset to Agilent's condensed consolidated statement of operations in the period it is abandoned.
In July 2012, the FASB simplified the guidance for testing for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. The changes are intended to reduce compliance costs. Agilent's indefinite-lived intangible assets are in the IPR&D intangible assets. The revisedaccounting guidance allows a qualitative approach for testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, similar to the recently issued impairment testing guidance for goodwill and allows the option to first assess qualitative factors (events and circumstances) that could have affected the significant inputs used in determining the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to determine whether it is more likelymore-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than not (meaning a likelihood of more than 50 percent)50% chance) that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. An organization may choose to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to calculating its fair value. The amendments are effectiveWe performed a qualitative test for annual andimpairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets as of September 30, 2015. Based on the results of our qualitative
interimtesting, we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets is greater than their respective carrying values. Each quarter we review the events and circumstances to determine if impairment tests performed for fiscalof indefinite-lived intangible asset is indicated. In the years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. Agilent adopted this guidance forended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recorded an impairment of $3 million, $4 million and zero, respectively due to the cancellation of certain IPR&D projects. In addition, in the year ended October 31, 2012. We2014, we also recorded an$12 million of impairment of $1 million in 2012, relatingother intangibles due to an IPR&D project that was abandoned. No impairments were recorded in 2011 and 2010.the exit of our NMR business.
Restructuring and exit of NMR business. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, we made the decision to cease the manufacture and sale of our nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) product line within our life sciences and applied markets segment.
The main components of expenses are related to workforce reductions, assets impairments and write-downs and special charges to inventory, which mainly relates to exiting of one of our businesses. Workforce reduction charges are accrued when payment of benefits that the employees are entitled to becomes probable and the amounts can be estimated. We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets, may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, we assesshave also assessed the recoverability of our long-lived assets, by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the totalAsset impairments primarily consist of property, plant and equipment and are based on an estimate of the undiscountedamounts and timing of future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. In 2012, we recorded $1 million of impairments of other intangibles related to the cancellationexpected future remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of an in-process researchbuildings and development project. We performed impairment analysesequipment net of purchased intangible assets in 2011costs to sell. The charges related to inventory include estimated future inventory disposal payments that we are contractually obliged to make to our suppliers and recorded $3 millioninventory written-down to net realizable value. If the amounts and timing of cash flows from restructuring activities are significantly different from what we have estimated, the actual amount of restructuring and asset impairment charges primarily related to a business wherecould be materially different, either higher or lower, than those we ceased operations. We performed impairment analyses of purchased intangible assets in 2010 and recorded $13 million of impairment charges primarily related to a divested business.have recorded.
Accounting for income taxes.We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits, benefits and deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes, as well as interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Significant changes to these estimates may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a subsequent period.
Significant management judgment is also required in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. When it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that all or some portion of specific deferred tax assets such as net operating losses or foreign tax credit carryforwards will not be realized, a valuation allowance must be established for the amount of the deferred tax assets that cannot be realized. We consider all available positive and negative evidence on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis when assessing whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. We consider evidence such as our past operating results, the existence of losses in recent years and our forecast of future taxable income. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 we released the valuation allowance for the majority of our U.S. deferred tax assets. At October 31, 2012,2015, we providedcontinue to recognize a valuation allowance for certain U.S. state and foreign deferred tax assets. We intend to maintain a valuation allowance in these jurisdictions until sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, we concluded that the valuation allowance for most of our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets is no longer needed primarily due to the emergence from cumulative losses in recent years, the return to sustainable U.S. operating profits and the expectation of sustainable profitability in future periods. As of October 31, 2012, the cumulative positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence regarding the likelihood that most of the deferred tax asset for Agilent's U.S. consolidated income tax group will be realized. Accordingly, we recognized a non-recurring, non-cash tax benefit of $280 million relating to the valuation allowance reversal.
We have not provided for all U.S. federal income and foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings of some of our foreign subsidiaries because we intend to reinvest such earnings indefinitely. Should we decide to remit this income to the U.S. in a future period, our provision for income taxes will increase materially in that period.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax law and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. Although the guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes the use of a recognition and measurement model, the determination of whether an uncertain tax position has met those thresholds will continue to require significant judgment by management. In accordance with the guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, for all U.S. and other tax jurisdictions, we recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. The ultimate resolution of tax uncertainties may differ from what is currently estimated, which could result in a material impact on income tax expense. If our estimate of income tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would be required. If events occur and the payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. We include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations.
As a part of our accounting for business combinations, intangible assets are recognized at fair values and goodwill is measured as the excess of consideration transferred over the net estimated fair values of assets acquired. Impairment charges associated with goodwill are generally not tax deductible and will result in an increased effective income tax rate in the period that any impairment is recorded. Amortization expenses associated with acquired intangible assets are generally not tax deductible and therefore deferred tax liabilities have been recorded for non-deductible amortization expenses as a part of the accounting for business combinations.
Adoption of New Pronouncements
See Note 2,3, "New Accounting Pronouncements," to the consolidated financial statements for a description of new accounting pronouncements.
Restructuring Costs, Asset ImpairmentsExit of NMR Business
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, we made the decision to cease the manufacture and Other Charges
Our 2009 restructuring program,sale of our nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) product line within our life sciences and applied markets segment. The exit of the ("FY 2009 Plan"), announcedNMR business was primarily due to the lack of growth and profitability of the product line. These actions involved severance and other personnel costs related to the workforce reduction of approximately 300 employees primarily located in the first halfUnited Kingdom and California and non-cash charges related to intangible asset impairments and other asset write-downs including inventory. After including employee reductions due to attrition and the application to open positions and acceptance of 2009,employment within the company of some employees previously affected, we have approximately 30 employees that are pending termination under the above actions as of October 31, 2015. We expect to complete these restructuring activities by early fiscal 2016. For the year ended October 31, 2015, the exit of the NMR business has positively impacted our operating profit by $15 million. As of October 31, 2015, approximately $15 million was conceived in responsepaid to deteriorating economic conditions and was designeddate under these restructuring activities. We will continue to deliver sufficient savingsprovide service support to enable our businesses to reach their profitability targets throughout the cycle. Workforce reduction payments, primarily severance, were largely complete in fiscal year 2010. Lease payments should primarily be complete by the end of fiscal 2014.NMR installed base.
Foreign Currency
Our revenues, costs and expenses, and monetary assets and liabilities are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates as a result of our global operating and financing activities. The unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates has decreased revenue by approximately 6 percentage points for the year ended October 31, 2015. Costs and expenses, incurred in local currency, were subject to the favorable effects due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates for the year ended October 31, 2015, reducing our overall net exposure. The impact of foreign currency exchange rates movements can be positive or negative in any period and is calculated by applying the prior period foreign currency exchange rates to the current year period. We hedge revenues, expenses and balance sheet exposures that are not denominated in the functional currencies of our subsidiaries on a short term and anticipated basis. We do experience some fluctuations within individual lines of the condensed consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet because our hedging program is not designed to offset the currency movements in each category of revenues, expenses, monetary assets and liabilities. Our hedging program is designed to hedge currency movements on a relatively short-term basis (up to a rolling twelve month period). Therefore, we are exposed to currency fluctuations over the longer term. To the extent that we are required to pay for all, or portions, of an acquisition price in foreign currencies, Agilent may enter into foreign exchange contracts to reduce the risk that currency movements will impact the U.S. dollar cost of the transaction.
Results from Operations
Orders and Net Revenue
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
% Change | | 2011 over 2010
% Change | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
% Change | | 2014 over 2013
% Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | | (in millions) | | | | |
| Orders | $ | 6,877 |
| | $ | 6,769 |
| | $ | 5,744 |
| | 2% | | 18% | |
| Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 5,659 |
| | $ | 5,482 |
| | $ | 4,464 |
| | 3% | | 23% | $ | 3,146 |
| | $ | 3,185 |
| | $ | 3,083 |
| | (1)% | | 3% |
| Services and other | $ | 1,199 |
| | $ | 1,133 |
| | $ | 980 |
| | 6% | | 16% | $ | 892 |
| | $ | 863 |
| | $ | 811 |
| | 4% | | 6% |
| Total net revenue | $ | 6,858 |
| | $ | 6,615 |
| | $ | 5,444 |
| | 4% | | 22% | $ | 4,038 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
| | $ | 3,894 |
| | — | | 4% |
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Ppts Change | | 2011 over 2010
Ppts Change | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Ppts Change | | 2014 over 2013
Ppts Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| % of total net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Products | 83 | % | | 83 | % | | 82 | % | | — | | 1 ppt | 78 | % | | 79 | % | | 79 | % | | (1) ppt | | — |
| Services and other | 17 | % | | 17 | % | | 18 | % | | — | | (1) ppt | 22 | % | | 21 | % | | 21 | % | | 1 ppt | | — |
| Total | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | 100 | % | | | | |
Agilent's total ordersnet revenue of $4,038 million in 2012 were $6,877 million, an increase of 2 percent2015 was flat when compared to 2011. 2014. Foreign currency movements for 2015 had an unfavorable impact of approximately 6 percentage points compared to 2014. Agilent's net revenue of $4,048 million increased 4 percent in 2014 when compared to 2013.
The increaselife sciences and applied markets business brings together Agilent's analytical laboratory instrumentation and informatics. Revenue decreased 2 percent in orders associated with the Dako acquisition accounted for2015 when compared to 2014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 5 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. In addition, an unfavorable impact on revenue of approximately 2 percentage points of order growth forpoint in 2015 was largely due to the NMR business which we are exiting. For the year ended October 31, 2012 when compared to 2011. Within each2015 and excluding the impact of currency movements and the NMR business, our performance within the life sciences business showed consistent revenue growth from sales to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market partially offset by a decrease in the revenue generated from sales to the life sciences research market. Within applied markets and excluding the impact of currency movements and the NMR business, there was weakness in the chemical analysis and electronic measurement businesses, orders were flatenergy markets in the year ended October 31, 2015 when compared to the prior year. Orders within our diagnosticsRevenue from sales to the life sciences and genomicsapplied markets business increased 442 percent in 2014 when compared to last year and was attributable to the Dako acquisition. Agilent's total orders in 2011 increased 18 percent when compared to 2010. The increase in orders associated with the Varian acquisition less the orders attributable to our divested businesses accounted for 5 percentage points of order growth for2013. For the year ended October 31, 2011 when compared to 2010.
Agilent's net revenue of $6,858 million increased 4 percent when compared to 2011. The revenue increase associated with2014 our performance within the Dako acquisition accounted for approximately 2 percentage points of the revenue increase for the year ended October 31, 2012 when compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of approximately 1 percentage point
compared to 2011. There was modest growth in demand for life sciences products led by an increase in revenue frombusiness improved with sales to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market but there was alsopartially offset by a corresponding decrease in the revenue generated from the academic and governmentlife sciences research market for the year ended October 31, 2012, when compared to the prior year. Within our chemical analysis businessapplied markets there was revenue grew moderately compared withgrowth from sales to all markets in the prior year. There were modest increases in revenue from the food safety and forensics markets, but environmental and petrochemical markets were relatively flatyear ended October 31, 2014 when compared to the prior year.
The diagnostics and genomics business growth comparedis comprised of three areas of activity. First, we are focused on pathology, companion diagnostics and reagent partnerships. Second, the genomics business includes our arrays, NGS target enrichment and our other genomics solutions. Third, the nucleic acid solutions business manufactures synthetic RNA to the prior year was attributable to the acquisition of Dako. Within electronic measurement, total revenue from general purpose marketsbe potentially used as active pharmaceutical ingredients. Revenue was flat in 20122015 when compared to 2014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 8 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. Excluding the impact of foreign currency movements, growth in revenue from sales to the diagnostics and clinical research market was strong in the year ended October 31, 2015 when compared to the prior year with a modest shortfallyear. Revenue increased 5 percent in revenue from aerospace and defense offset by an increase in revenue from the computer and semi-conductor market. Also within electronic measurement, the communications test business was flat for2014 when compared to 2013. For the year ended October 31, 20122014 our performance within the diagnostics and genomics business improved from sales to the diagnostics and clinical markets when compared to the prior year with wireless manufacturing reporting good revenue growthyear.
The Agilent CrossLab business combines our analytical laboratory services and consumables business. Revenue increased 2 percent in the year offset by a decline in the revenue from the wireless R&D market. Agilent's total net revenue in 2011 increased 22 percent2015 when compared to 2010. The revenue increase associated with the Varian acquisition less the revenue attributable to our divested businesses accounted for 52014. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable impact of approximately 7 percentage points in 2015 when compared to 2014. Excluding the impact of revenue increase forforeign currency movements there was growth in sales to all key end markets, in particular, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology market in the year ended October 31, 20112015 when compared to 2010. Note 21, "Segment Information" shows a reconciliation between segmentlast year. Within the applied markets revenue in chemical and net revenue.energy end markets were slower but still reported growth when adjusted for currency movements. Revenue increased 7 percent in 2014 when compared to 2013. Revenue growth from sales to all markets was similar to that of our life sciences and applied markets business in the year ended October 31, 2014 when compared to last year.
Services and other revenue includeincludes revenue generated from servicing our installed base of products, warranty extensions and consulting.consulting including companion diagnostics. Services and other revenue increased 64 percent in 20122015 as compared to 2011.2014. The service and other revenue growth is higher than product revenue growth due toimpacted by a portion of the revenue being driven more by the current and previously installed base than current period product sales.base. Service and other revenue increased due to increased service contract renewals, laboratory productivity services and strong companion diagnostics revenue. Services and other revenue increased 166 percent in 20112014 as compared to 2010. The increase in services and other revenue associated with the Varian acquisition less the revenue attributable to the network solutions divestiture accounted for 2 percentage points of revenue increase in 2011.2013.
Backlog
On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the electronic measurement business was approximately $800 million, as compared to approximately $850 million at October 31, 2011. On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the chemical analysis business was approximately $360 million, as compared to approximately $320 million at October 31, 2011. Within our life sciences business, our unfilled backlog was approximately $500 million on October 31, 2012 as compared to approximately $490 million at October 31, 2011. On October 31, 2012, our unfilled backlog for the diagnostics and genomics business was approximately $30 million, as compared to approximately $30 million at October 31, 2011. We expect that a majority of the unfilled backlog for all four businesses will be delivered to customers within six months. On average, our unfilled backlog represents approximately three months' worth of revenues. We believe backlog on any particular date, while indicative of short-term revenue performance, is not necessarily a reliable indicator of medium or long-term revenue performance.
Costs and Expenses
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| Gross margin on products | 53.9 | % | | 54.9 | % | | 55.7 | % | | (1) ppt | | (1) ppt | 52.5 | % | | 50.8 | % | | 50.6 | % | | 2 ppts | | — |
| Gross margin on services and other | 46.1 | % | | 45.9 | % | | 45.1 | % | | — | | 1 ppt | 43.8 | % | | 41.6 | % | | 43.0 | % | | 2 ppts | | (1) ppt |
| Total gross margin | 52.6 | % | | 53.3 | % | | 53.8 | % | | (1) ppt | | (1) ppt | 50.5 | % | | 48.8 | % | | 49.0 | % | | 2 ppts | | — |
| Operating margin | 16.3 | % | | 16.2 | % | | 10.3 | % | | — | | 6 ppts | 12.9 | % | | 10.4 | % | | 9.9 | % | | 3 ppts | | 1 ppt |
| | | (in millions) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 668 |
| | $ | 649 |
| | $ | 612 |
| | 3% | | 6% | $ | 330 |
| | $ | 358 |
| | $ | 337 |
| | (8)% | | 6% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 1,817 |
| | $ | 1,809 |
| | $ | 1,752 |
| | — | | 3% | $ | 1,189 |
| | $ | 1,199 |
| | $ | 1,184 |
| | (1)% | | 1% |
In 2012, totalTotal gross margin decreased 1margins for the year ended October 31, 2015 increased 2 percentage pointpoints when compared to last year. Increases in comparison to 2011. The unfavorable impact of product mix, increased intangible amortization and inventory fair value adjustments related to the Dako acquisition were offset by lower variable and incentive pay. In 2011, total gross margins decreased 1 percentage point in comparison to 2010. The unfavorable impactfor the year ended October 31, 2015 were the result of the Varian acquisition (including fair value adjustments)lower intangible asset amortization, favorable product mix and higher variable and incentive pay were largelyimproved manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by the benefitsimpact of favorable volume impacts, decreased businessunfavorable currency movements and infrastructure programs and lower restructuring costs. Operatingwage increases. Total gross margins in
2012for the year ended October 31, 2014 were flat when compared to 2011. This wasprior year. Total gross margins for the year ended October 31, 2014 were impacted by favorable product mix offset by higher regulatory costs to address an FDA warning letter, which is now lifted and wage increases.
Total operating margins increased 3 percentage points for the year ended October 31, 2015, when compared to last year. Operating margins improved due to increased gross margins and reduced expenses on lower revenue compared to last year. Total operating margins increased 1 percentage point for the year ended October 31, 2014, when compared to last year. In 2014 there were higher costs as a result of maintaining cost control through a decrease in variable and incentive pay while absorbing increases in expenditurethe exit from acquisitions and wage increases. Operating margins in 2011 increased 6 percentage points as compared to 2010 due to higher volume partly offset by increased variable and incentive pay.the NMR business together with some pre separation expenses associated with the separation of Keysight.
Gross inventory charges, included in continuing operations, were $30 million in 2012, 20112015, $46 million in 2014 and 2010.$27 million in 2013. Sales of previously written down inventory, included in continuing operations, were $5$13 million in 2012, 20112015, $8 million in 2014 and 2010.$6 million in 2013.
Our research and development efforts focus on potential new products and product improvements covering a wide variety of technologies, none of which is individually significant to our operations. We conduct fivethree types of research and development: basic research, foundation technologies communications,and life sciences and measurement.sciences. Our research seeks to improve on various technical competencies in electronics, software, systems and solutions, life sciences and photonics.diagnostics. In each of these research fields, we conduct research that is focused on specific product development for release in the short-term as well as other research that is intended to be the foundation for future products over a longer time-horizon. Some of our product development research is designed to improve on the more than 20,000 products already in production, focus on major new product releases, and develop new product segments for the future. Due to the breadth of research and development projects across all of our businesses, there are a number of drivers of this expense. We remain committed to invest about 10 percent of revenuessignificantly in research and development and have focused our development efforts on key strategic opportunities to align our business with available markets and position ourselves to capture market share.
Research and development expenditures increased 3expenses decreased 8 percent in 2012for the year ended October 31, 2015 when compared to 2011. Increasedwith last year. R&D expenditure wasdecreased due to ourthe impact of foreign currency movements, savings from the exit from the NMR business and transformation initiatives, offset by wage increases. Research and development expenses increased 6 percent for the year ended October 31, 2014 when compared with last year. R&D expenditure increased due to continued investment in newnext generation products and expanding our product development and technologies and increased costs due to acquisitions, primarily Dako, offset by lower variable and incentive pay. Research and development expenditures increased 6 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. Increases were due to new product development, the Varian acquisition and higher variable and incentive pay. These increases were partly offset by the impact of the divested businesses (the network solutions and Hycor businesses) and decreased restructuring expenses.portfolios.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were flatdecreased 1 percent in 2012 when2015 compared to 2011. Increases2014. There were increases in expenditure mostly due to the acquisitionimpact of Dako, wage increases, higher commissions and investments in sales channel coveragecosts associated with business improvement and transformation initiatives more than offset by decreasesfavorable foreign currency movements and the decline in variable and incentive pay and lower commissions.NMR expenses due to the exiting of that business together with a decrease in pre separation expenses related to the separation of Keysight. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 31 percent in 20112014 compared to 2010. Increased2013. Selling, general and administrative expenditure wasincreased mostly due to the Varian acquisitionimpact of wage increases and higher variable and incentive pay offset by the impact of decreased restructuring expenses and the costs associated with the divested businesses (the network solutions and Hycor businesses).
For the year ended October 31, 2010 we recorded a $132 million gain on the sale of our network solutions business and $54 million of other income in respect of a tax sharing settlement with Hewlett Packard Company.commissions.
Interest expense for the years ended October 31, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was $101$66 million, $86$110 million and $96$107 million, respectively, and relates to the interest charged on our senior notes offset by the amortization of deferred gains recorded upon
termination of interest rate swap contracts. The decrease in interest expense in 2015 compared with 2014 and 2013 is due to debt redemptions as part of the debt repositioning as a result of the separation of the Keysight business.
At October 31, 2012,2015, our headcount was approximately 20,50011,800 compared to 18,70011,900 in 2011 and 18,5002014.
Other income (expense), net
For the year ended October 31, 2015 other income (expense), net includes $25 million of income in 2010. A significant proportionrespect of the increase in our headcount in 2012, comparedprovision of certain IT and site service costs to, 2011, was dueand lease income from, Keysight. The costs associated with these services are reported within income from operations. Agilent expects to receive lease income and site service income from Keysight over the Dako acquisition.next 4-5 years of approximately $13 million per year. For the year ended October 31, 2014 other income (expense) net, included a net loss on the early redemption of senior notes of $89 million.
Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (in millions) |
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | 42 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 68 |
|
For 2012,2015, the company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations was 8.7 percent. The income tax expense from continuing operations was $42 million. The income tax provision from continuing operations for the year ended October 31, 2015 included net discrete tax benefits of $55 million. The net discrete tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2015 included $32 million of net tax benefit primarily due to the settlement of an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS) audit in the U.S. and the recognition of tax expense related to the repatriation of dividends to the U.S. The remaining $23 million net tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2015 included $16 million of tax benefit related to the de-registration of certain foreign branches and statutue of limitations lapses, $6 million of tax benefit for the extension of the U.S. research and development tax credit attributable to the company's prior fiscal year and $1 million of other discrete benefits.
For 2014, the company's effective tax rate from continuing operations was (1.3) percent. The income tax benefit from continuing operations was $3 million. The income tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2014 included a net discrete benefit of $33 million primarily due to the settlement of an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") audit in the U.S. and the recognition of tax expense related to the repatriation of dividends.
For 2013, the effective tax rate reflects a favorable benefit of 11from continuing operations was 23.4 percent. The 1123.4 percent effective tax rate benefit reflects tax on earnings in jurisdictions that have low effective tax rates and includes a $280 million tax benefit due tois lower than the reversal of a valuation allowance for most U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances require an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. In the fourth quarter of 2012, management concluded that the valuation allowance for most of Agilent's U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets is no longer neededstatutory rate primarily due to the emergence from cumulative losses in recent years, the return to sustainable U.S. operating profits and the expectationmix of sustainable profitability in future periods. As of October 31, 2012, the cumulative positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence regarding the likelihood that most of the deferred tax asset for Agilent's U.S. consolidated income tax group will be realized. Accordingly, we recognized a
non-recurring tax benefit of $280 million relating to the valuation allowance reversal. The effective tax rate also includes a non-recurring tax expense of $88 million relating to an increase in the overall residual U.S. tax expected to be imposed upon the repatriation of unremitted foreign earnings previously considered permanently reinvested. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we assessed the forecasted cash needs and overall financial position of our foreign subsidiaries and determined that a portion of previously permanently reinvested earnings would no longer be reinvested overseas. The effective tax rate is also reduced by a $68 million tax benefit primarily associated with the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of the related interest accruals due to the reassessment of certain uncertain tax positions relating to foreign jurisdictions.
For 2011, the effective tax rate was 2 percent. The 2 percent effective tax rate reflects tax on earnings in non-U.S. jurisdictions that had low effectivetaxed at lower statutory rates; in particular Singapore where we enjoy tax rates and includes a $97 million net tax benefit primarily associated with a refund in Canada and the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of the related interest accruals due to the reassessment of certain uncertain tax positions. The income tax provision also included a $26 million out of period adjustment to reduce the carrying value of certain U.K. deferred tax assets for which the majority was recorded in the quarter ended April 30, 2011. The overstatement of these deferred tax assets resulted in an overstatement of the U.K. valuation allowance release in the fourth quarter of 2010. For the full year, this out of period adjustment was substantially offset by other out of period adjustments. The net impact of all out of period adjustments on the effective tax rate was immaterial. Without considering interest and penalties, the effective rate reflected taxes in all jurisdictions except the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions in which income tax expense or benefit continued to be offset by adjustments to valuation allowances.
For 2010, the effective tax rate was 1 percent. The 1 percent effective tax rate included a $101 million beneficial release of the U.K. valuation allowance, a $32 million current year increase in prior year tax reserves, and tax on earnings in jurisdictions that had low effective tax rates. Also included is a $17 million tax benefit related to a $54 million non-taxable settlement payment received in connection with a tax sharing agreement between Agilent and Hewlett Packard Company. Without considering interest and penalties, the effective rate reflected taxes in all jurisdictions except the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions in which income tax expense or benefit continued to be offset by adjustments to valuation allowances.holidays.
Agilent enjoys tax holidays in several different jurisdictions, most significantly in Singapore and Malaysia.Singapore. The tax holidays provide lower rates of taxation on certain classes of income and require various thresholds of investments and employment or specific types of income in those jurisdictions. The tax holidays are due for renewal between 20152016 and 2023. As a result of the incentives, the impact of the tax holidays decreased income taxes by $122$65 million, $127$27 million, and $62$44 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. The benefit of the tax holidays on net income per share (diluted) was approximately $0.35, $0.36,$0.19, $0.08, and $0.18$0.13 in 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively.
In accordance with the guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, for all U.S. and other tax jurisdictions, we recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. If our estimate of income tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would be required. If events occur and the payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary. We include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations.
On November 1, 2014, Agilent transferred deferred tax assets of $237 million, deferred tax liabilities of $37 million, current income tax payable of $40 million, and other long-term liabilities related to uncertain tax positions totaling $8 million to Keysight as part of its separation from Agilent. A current prepaid income tax asset of $19 million and long-term prepaid income tax asset of $3 million related to sales of intercompany assets was also transferred to Keysight upon separation from Agilent. In addition,
for the year ended October 31, 2015, a $6 million return to provision adjustment for Keysight associated with bonus depreciation was recognized through retained earnings.
In the U.S., tax years remain open back to the year 20062012 for federal income tax purposes and the year 2000 for significant states. In 2011, Agilent and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)On September 22, 2015, we reached an agreement with the IRS for the tax years 2008 through 2011. We expect to make a payment of approximately $9 million as part of closing the exam. As a result, in 2015 we reclassified a portion of other long-term liabilities to other accrued liabilities related to uncertain tax positions of continuing operations that we expect to pay within the next twelve months. This amount is partially offset by a prepaid tax account of approximately $3 million that the IRS is allowing as an offset to the $12 million in incremental taxes. The settlement resulted in the recognition, within the continuing operations, of previously unrecognized tax benefits of $119 million, offset by a tax liability on transfer pricing issues coveringforeign distributions of approximately $99 million principally related to the repatriation of foreign earnings.
On January 29, 2014, we reached an agreement with the IRS for the tax years 2003 - 2007. Tax adjustments resulting from these agreements were offset with net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Agilent's U.S. federal income tax returns for 2006 through 2007 are currently under audit2007. The settlement resulted in the recognition, within the continuing operations, of previously unrecognized tax benefits of $111 million, offset by the IRS. During the three months ended July 31, 2012, we received a Revenue Agents Report (“RAR”) for these years and filed a protest to dispute certain adjustments, the most significanttax liability on foreign distributions of which pertainsapproximately $75 million principally related to the amountrepatriation of a gain from the disposition of a business that was allocated to the U.S. for income tax purposes. There can be no assurance that the outcome of this dispute will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. foreign earnings.
In other major jurisdictions where we conductthe company conducts business, the tax years generally remain open back to the year 2003. With these jurisdictions and the U.S., it is reasonably possible that there could be significant changes to our unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months due to either the expiration of a statute of limitation or a tax audit settlement.settlement which will be partially offset by an anticipated tax liability related to unremitted foreign earnings, where applicable. Given the number of years and numerous matters that remain subject to examination in various tax jurisdictions, we aremanagement is unable to estimate the range of possible changes to the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits.
On July 27, 2015, the U.S. Tax Court issued an opinion in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in an intercompany cost-sharing arrangement. A final decision was entered by the U.S. Tax Court on December 1, 2015. At this time, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement from its regulations to include stock-based compensation. The I.R.S. has the right to appeal the U.S. Tax Court decision. We concluded that no adjustment to our consolidated financial statements is appropriate at this time due to the uncertainties with respect to the ultimate resolution of this case.
Segment Overview
Agilent isIn November 2014, we announced a measurement company providing core bio-analytical and electronic measurement solutionschange in organizational structure designed to thebetter serve our customers. Our life sciences business, excluding the nucleic acid solutions division, together with the chemical analysis communicationsbusiness combined to form a new segment called life sciences and electronics,applied markets business. Our diagnostics and genomics industries. Inbusinesses combined with the third fiscal quarter of 2012, we formed a new operating segment. The newnucleic acid solutions division from our life sciences business and became the diagnostics and genomics segment. Finally, the Agilent CrossLab segment was formed from a portion of our pre-existing life
sciences business plus the business of our recent acquisition of Dako A/S ("Dako"). Following this reorganization, Agilent has four business segments comprisedservices and consumables businesses previously part of the life sciences business, theand chemical analysis business, diagnosticsbusinesses. Financial reporting under this new structure is included within this report on Form 10-K and genomics business and the electronic measurement business. The historical financial segment numbers for both the life sciences and diagnostics and genomics segments haveinformation has been recast to conform to this new reporting structure inpresentation within our financial statements.
Life Sciences and Applied Markets
Our life sciences and applied markets business provides application-focused solutions that include instruments software, consumables, and servicessoftware that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products.products, as well as enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the molecular level. Key product categories in life sciences include: liquid chromatography ("LC") systems columns and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry ("LCMS") systems; gas chromatography ("GC") systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry ("GCMS") systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ("ICP-MS") instruments; atomic absorption ("AA") instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (“MP-AES”) instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry ("ICP-OES") instruments; laboratory software and informatics systems; laboratory automation and robotic systems; dissolution testing; nucleic acid solutions; Nuclear Magnetic Resonance ("NMR"), Magnetic Resonance Imaging ("MRI"),vacuum pumps and X-Ray Diffraction (“XRD”) systems; and services and support for the aforementioned products.measurement technologies.
Orders and Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Orders | $ | 1,594 |
| | $ | 1,597 |
| | $ | 1,279 |
| | — | | 25% |
| Net revenue from products | $ | 1,180 |
| | $ | 1,147 |
| | $ | 926 |
| | 3% | | 24% |
| Net revenue from services and other | 402 |
| | 368 |
| | 300 |
| | 9% | | 23% |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,582 |
| | $ | 1,515 |
| | $ | 1,226 |
| | 4% | | 24% |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 2,046 |
| | $ | 2,078 |
| | $ | 2,035 |
| | (2)% | | 2% |
Life sciences ordersscience and applied markets business revenue in 2012 were flat2015 decreased 2 percent compared to 2011.2014. Foreign currency movements for 2015 had an unfavorable impact of 25 percentage pointpoints on orderrevenue growth when compared to the priorsame period last year. OrderGeographically, revenue grew 4 percent in the Americas with a 3 percentage point unfavorable currency impact, grew 2 percent in Asia Pacific excluding Japan with a 1 percentage point unfavorable currency impact, declined 8 percent in Europe with a 10 percentage point unfavorable currency impact and declined 20 percent in Japan with a 13 percentage point unfavorable currency impact. Double digit revenue growth in the pharmaceutical market helped drive the revenue growth in the Americas, but was partially offset by declines in the life science and research market due to reductions in academia and government spending. In Europe, our pharmaceutical market revenue growth was not enough to offset declines in revenue from our life science and research market and softness in applied markets. Product revenue results were led by solid demand across the entire product folio, offset by decline in NMR revenue reducing overall growth by 2 percentage points. Life science and applied markets business revenue in 2014 increased 2 percent compared to 2013. Product revenue results in 2014 were led by growth in GCMS and spectroscopy, and partially offset by declines in LCMS and NMR.
End market performance reflected mixed growth across markets in 2015. Our pharmaceutical and biotechnology market revenue growth was strong, and driven by technology refreshes. Larger pharmaceutical companies, continue to upgrade to the latest technologies and help drive revenue growth in this market. In life science research, reduced budgets and delayed spending on capital equipment from government entities, led to a decline in revenue in this market segment. Applied market revenue growth was weaker primarily due to the revenue from the chemical and energy market where lower oil prices have reduced capital spending. Excluding currency movements and the NMR business, environmental decreased when compared to last year as weakness in the informatics, automation, nucleic acid,US oil and services portfolios. Geographically, orders grew 6 percentgas markets is now spreading to related environmental testing markets. Sales to the food market were down slightly when compared to last year excluding currency movements and the NMR business. Revenue growth in 2014 was led by strong pharmaceutical sales and moderate revenue growth in applied markets, partially offset by a reduction in revenue from the Americas, declined 10 percentlife science and research markets compared to the prior year.
Looking forward we are optimistic about continued growth from pharmaceutical sales and the technology replacement business from our strong portfolio offering. While low spending levels in Europe, grew 19 percent in Japan,life science research and reduced chemical and energy spending continue to be a concern, we continue to see opportunities for customers buying replacement instruments and we will keep strengthening our product and technology portfolio accordingly.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the life sciences and applied markets business' margins, expenses and income from operations for 2015 versus 2014, and 2014 versus 2013.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| Total gross margin | 56.2 | % | | 55.8 | % | | 53.9 | % | | — | | 2 ppts |
| Operating margin | 18.6 | % | | 17.7 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 1 ppt | | 1 ppt |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 192 |
| | $ | 215 |
| | $ | 207 |
| | (10)% | | 4% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 576 |
| | $ | 576 |
| | $ | 551 |
| | — | | 4% |
| Income from operations | $ | 380 |
| | $ | 369 |
| | $ | 338 |
| | 3% | | 9% |
Gross margins were flat in other Asia Pacific during 2012 when2015 compared to 2011. Budget constraints2014. The effects of product mix in 2015 had a negligible affect on gross margins relative to 2014 . Increases for wages and cautious spending weighed on the resultsmaterials were largely offset by improvement in Europe. Life sciences ordersoperational efficiencies. Gross margins in 20112014 increased 25 percent compared to 2010, driven by strength in the LCMS, automation, and informatics portfolios, along with consumables and services. Excluding the impact of the Varian and Biocius acquisitions and the Hycor divestiture, orders grew 13 percent year over year.
Life sciences net revenue in 2012 increased 4 percent compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of 2 percentage points compared to 2011. Revenue growth was led by strength2013. Improvement in the LCMS, informatics, automation, nucleic acid solutions, and services portfolios. Services business was strong dueall major product groups contributed to demand for service contracts, maintenance, and multi-vendor services. Geographically, revenue grew 6 percent in the Americas, 1 percent in Europe, 4 percent in Japan, and 7 percent in other Asia Pacific during 2012 when compared to 2011. Life sciences revenue in 2011 increased 24 percent compared to 2010, with growth in the Americas helped by an expanded sales channel selling a broader portfolio of products to our customers. Excluding the impact of the Varian and Biocius acquisitions and the Hycor divestiture, revenue grew 13 percent year over year.
During this fiscal year, revenue grew in the pharmaceutical and biotech markets, food testing, and all other applied markets including forensics, petrochemical, and environmental. Despite tightening of budgets, growth in the pharmaceutical market was driven by technology refresh programs leading to replacement business, quality assurance, and quality control. The food market saw moderate growth as global food regulations continue to drive demand. LCMS food testing was driven by the continued uptake of metabolomics LCMS Quadrupole Time-of-Flight (Q-TOF) based solutions in the food industry and improved software analysis tools. Applied markets also grew from last year, with forensics, petrochemical, and environmental applications all making moderate gains. The academia and government market was rather weak, reflecting the macroeconomic environment.
The overall macroeconomic weakness has affected demand for our instruments and application solutions, and we expect that to continue at the start of the next fiscal year. Despite this weakness, we continue to invest in expanding and improving our life sciences applications and solutions portfolio. Our new products released during the year, such as the 1290 Infinity Quaternary LC System, continue our technology leadership in the LC market by setting new benchmarks for performance, versatility and cost-of-ownership. In addition, we continue to focus on application-specific solutions in emerging countries and markets.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the life sciences business' margins, expenses and income from operations for 2012 versus 2011, and 2011 versus 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| Total gross margin | 50.8 | % | | 50.4 | % | | 52.4 | % | | — | | (2) ppts |
| Operating margin | 14.5 | % | | 13.3 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 1 ppt | | (3) ppts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 141 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 104 |
| | 5% | | 29% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 433 |
| | $ | 427 |
| | $ | 335 |
| | 1% | | 28% |
| Income from operations | $ | 230 |
| | $ | 202 |
| | $ | 203 |
| | 14% | | (1)% |
Gross margins in 2012 remained flat comparedyear on year gain due partly to 2011. Favorable revenueincreased sales volume and lower material costs were offset by higher infrastructure costs and unfavorable product mix. Gross margins declined by 2 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to theimproved operational efficiency. Product mix also had a favorable impact of the Varian portfolio, which has loweron gross margins, higher logistics costs, and higher consumables costs partially offset by favorable volume impact.margins.
Research and development expenses increased 5decreased 10 percent in 20122015 when compared to 2011. The increase was mainly due to continued investment in new products2014. Excluding NMR, research and technologies.development expenses were down 4 percent from the prior year impacted by our transformation initiatives. Research and development expenses increased 294 percent in 20112014 compared to 2010, mostly2013. Investments in software and higher infrastructure costs contributed to the increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were flat in 2015 compared to 2014. Excluding NMR, selling, general and administrative expenses grew 3 percent primarily due to our Varian and Biocius acquisitions and investmentsdis-synergies in new product development.
infrastructure costs from the separation of Keysight. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 14 percent in 20122014 compared to 2011.2013. The 2014 increase was dueprimarily related to investments in sales channel coverage with a focus on emerging markets, partially offset by lowerincreased commissions and discretionary spending. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 28 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was due to acquisitions (Varian and Biocius), higher commissions, and investments in sales channel coverage.infrastructure costs.
Operating margins increased by 1 percentage point in 20122015 compared to 2011. The increase was mainly2014. Expenses declined more than revenue to help with the improvement. Our NMR business, which we made a decision to exit at the end of 2014, had an unfavorable impact on operating margin for fiscal year 2015 as we continued to ship off backlog in winding down the operation. Operating margins increased by 1 percentage point in 2014 compared to 2013, due to favorable gross profit fromslightly higher revenue outpacing operating expense growth. Operating margins declined by 3 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010 as the operating expense growth slightly outpaced the increasedand improved gross profit.margins.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 2012 increased by $28 million or 14 percent on a revenue increase of $67 million, a 41 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental. Income from operations in 2011 decreased by $1 million or 1 percent despite a revenue increase of $289 million. Operating margin incremental is measured by the increase in income from operations compared to the prior period divided by the increase in revenue compared to the prior period.
Chemical Analysis
Our chemical analysis business provides application-focused solutions that include instruments, software, consumables, and services that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products. Key product categories in chemical analysis include: gas chromatography (GC) systems, columns and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) instruments; atomic absorption (AA) instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) instruments; molecular spectroscopy instruments; software and data systems; vacuum pumps and measurement technologies; services and support for our products.
Orders and Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Orders | $ | 1,604 |
| | $ | 1,589 |
| | $ | 1,224 |
| | 1% | | 30% |
| Net revenue from products | $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 1,194 |
| | $ | 954 |
| | 3% | | 25% |
| Net revenue from services and other | 340 |
| | 324 |
| | 246 |
| | 5% | | 32% |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,559 |
| | $ | 1,518 |
| | $ | 1,200 |
| | 3% | | 27% |
Chemical analysis orders in 2012 increased 1 percent compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of 1 percentage point compared to 2011. Order results were led by solid performance in services and consumables, along with GC-MS and ICP-MS instruments. Service orders were led by strength in contracts and lab management services. ICP-MS orders were led by our 7700 Series ICP-MS and 8800 ICP-MS Triple Quadrupole (ICP-QQQ). Growth was largely offset by declines in GC instruments and the vacuum pump portfolio. Geographically, orders grew 5 percent in the Americas, declined 5 percent in Europe, declined 4 percent in Japan, and grew 4 percent in other Asia Pacific during 2012 when compared to 2011. Europe was negatively impacted by the budget constraints and cautious spending. Chemical analysis orders in 2011 increased 30 percent compared to 2010, driven by strength in the GC, GC-MS, ICP-MS portfolios, along with consumables and services. Excluding the impact of the Varian and A2 Technologies acquisitions, orders grew 11 percent year over year.
Chemical analysis net revenue in 2012 increased 3 percent compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of 2 percentage points compared to 2011. Revenue growth was led by services and consumables, along with the strength in ICP-MS instruments. However, we continue to face challenges in the vacuum pump portfolio as weakness in semiconductor and industrial markets affected results. Geographically, revenue grew 2 percent in the Americas, declined 1 percent in Europe, declined 2 percent in Japan, and grew 8 percent in other Asia Pacific during 2012 when compared to 2011. Many U.S. government purchases have been slowed or put on hold due to continued weakness at the federal, state, and local levels, which slowed growth in the Americas. Other Asia Pacific was a bright spot, boosted by a strong finish in China during the last quarter. Chemical analysis revenue in 2011 increased 27 percent compared to 2010, with particularly strong growth in other Asia Pacific including China. Excluding the impact of the Varian and A2 Technologies acquisitions, revenues grew 8 percent year over year.
Growth was mixed in core end markets. The worldwide food market remains strong in all sectors, and demand to export safe and high quality food in the emerging markets remains robust. The food safety segment continues to drive increased testing capacity and instrument purchases in all product categories, consumables, and services. Forensics market growth was encouraging, particularly in developing countries. Increasing demand for screening and identification of abused prescription pharmaceuticals and designer drugs is driving purchasing of new, high resolution mass spectrometry technologies. Environmental has softened as government budget constraints impacted demand. Petrochemical market results were relatively flat. Weak industrial demand in chemical and energy end markets, along with declining prices, have negatively impacted profitability of companies in the energy and chemical market segment. This has resulted in customer cut backs on capital spending, and some slowing in the replacement business, particularly in the Americas and Europe. Other applied markets showed net growth as growth in the pharmaceutical and biotech markets was partially offset by decline in the academic and government markets.
The overall macroeconomic weakness has affected demand for our instruments and application solutions, and we expect that to continue in the near term. Despite this weakness, we will continue to invest in research and development and seek to expand our position in developing countries and emerging markets. Our new products released during the year, such as the GC-MS Q-TOF, ICP-QQQ, and MP-AES, have demonstrated strong market acceptance. In addition, we are focusing on improvements in profitability of the Varian portfolio by refreshing products and consolidating supply chain activities.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the chemical analysis business's margins, expenses and income from operations for 2012 versus 2011, and 2011 versus 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| Total gross margin | 51.4 | % | | 51.1 | % | | 53.5 | % | | — | | (2) ppts |
| Operating margin | 21.7 | % | | 20.6 | % | | 23.3 | % | | 1 ppt | | (3) ppts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 93 |
| | $ | 92 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | — | | 35% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 371 |
| | $ | 371 |
| | $ | 294 |
| | — | | 26% |
| Income from operations | $ | 338 |
| | $ | 313 |
| | $ | 279 |
| | 8% | | 12% |
Gross margins in 2012 remained flat compared to 2011. Higher product discounts were offset by favorable revenue volume and lower material costs. Gross margins declined by 2 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the addition of the Varian portfolio, which has lower gross margins and higher logistics costs.
Research and development expenses remained flat in 2012 compared to 2011. We continue to make investments in product R&D. Research and development expenses increased 35 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily driven by the Varian acquisition.
Selling, general and administrative expenses remained flat in 2012 compared to 2011. Investments in sales channel coverage with a focus on emerging markets were offset by lower commissions and discretionary spending. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 26 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, primarily driven by the Varian acquisition.
Operating margins increased by 1 percentage point in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was mainly due to favorable gross profit from higher revenue while holding expenses flat. Operating margins declined by 3 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010 due to decline in gross margins and increase in incremental operating expenses.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 2012 increased by $25 million or 8 percent on a revenue increase of $41 million, a 60 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental. Income from operations in 2011 increased by $34 million or 12 percent compared to 2010 on a revenue increase of $318 million, an 11 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental.
Diagnostics and Genomics
Our diagnostics and genomics business provides solutions that include reagents, instruments, software and consumables that enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the molecular level. With the acquisition of Dako, a new group of solutions have been added that extend our product offerings to cancer diagnostics with anatomic pathology workflows. Our broad portfolio of offerings include immunohistochemistry (“IHC”), In Situ Hybridization (“ISH”), Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining, special staining, DNA mutation detection, genotyping, gene copy number determination, identification of gene rearrangements, DNA methylation profiling, gene expression profiling, as well as automated gel electrophoresis-based sample analysis systems. We also collaborate with a number of major pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also called companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy.
Orders and Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Orders | $ | 399 |
| | $ | 278 |
| | $ | 247 |
| | 44% | | 13% |
| Net revenue from products | $ | 398 |
| | $ | 277 |
| | $ | 253 |
| | 45% | | 9% |
| Net revenue from services and other | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — | | — |
| Total net revenue | $ | 402 |
| | $ | 277 |
| | $ | 253 |
| | 45% | | 9% |
Diagnostics and genomics orders in 2012 increased 44 percent compared to 2011. The incremental orders associated with the acquisition of Dako accounted for 32 percent of our diagnostics and genomics business, and 45 percentage points of the order growth in 2012. Foreign currency movements had an unfavorable currency impact of 1 percentage points on the year-over-year. Excluding the impact of the Dako acquisition, the 2012 order growth was led by strength in CGH array, HaloPlex, GeneSpring and Bioanalyzer Chips & Reagents. Geographically, excluding the impact of the Dako acquisition, orders declined 5 percent in the Americas, 2 percent in Europe and 2 percent in other Asia Pacific as a result of macro-economic pressures in the Americas and Europe. Japan saw order growth of 12 percent compared to 2011 driven by the strong order performance as the country recovers from the triple disaster (tsunami, earthquake and nuclear reactor meltdown) in 2011. Diagnostics and genomics orders in 2011 increased 13 percent compared to 2010. Order results were led by strength in SureSelect, microarrays and Bioanalyzer sales. Geographically, orders grew 5 percent in the Americas, 15 percent in Europe, 21 percent in Japan, and 32 percent in other Asia Pacific during 2011 when compared to 2010.
Diagnostics and genomics net revenue in 2012 increased 45 percent compared to 2011. There was $126 million in revenue associated with the acquisition of Dako in 2012. The incremental revenue associated with the acquisition of Dako accounted for 31 percent of our diagnostics and genomics business, and 45 percentage points of revenue growth in 2012 compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements for 2012 had an unfavorable impact of 1 percentage point compared to 2011. The increase in services and other revenue in 2012 was due to the Dako acquisition. Excluding the impact of the Dako acquisition, revenue growth was led by TapeStations, HaloPlex, Bioanalyzer consumables and CGH arrays, offset by declines in microarrays and SureSelect. Revenue associated with the Dako acquisition consisted primarily of IHC product offerings. Geographically, excluding the impact of the Dako acquisition, revenues declined 1 percent in the Americas, 4 percent in Europe, 36 percent in other Asia Pacific, and grew 74 percent in Japan during 2012 when compared to 2011. Diagnostics and genomics net revenue in 2011 increased 9 percent compared to 2010. Foreign currency movements for 2011 had a favorable impact of 3 percentage points compared to 2010. Revenue growth was led by SureSelect and followed by solid performance in CGH and gene expression microarrays as well as Bioanalyzers. Geographically, revenues declined 2 percent in the Americas, grew 19 percent in Europe, 17 percent in Japan, and 26 percent in other Asia Pacific during 2011 when compared to 2010.
During 2012, we saw strong revenue growth in the clinical, diagnostics, and the pharmaceutical and biotech markets, with offsetting declines in the academic and government market. Solid growth in the clinical market reflected increased investments in genomics applications driven by aging populations all over the world and greater use of next generation sequencing within clinical centers. The cancer diagnostics market remained robust within pathology staining as the fundamental socio-demographic growth drivers continued to increase test volumes, while the more efficient automation solutions and test procedure standardization drove demand due to its cost and labor reduction advantages. Growth in the pharmaceutical and biotech market was strong, reflecting worldwide outsourcing demand for preclinical research and development as patents expire and generic drugs expand rapidly. The academia and government market remained soft in 2012 due to the U.S. and European cautious funding environments. However, next generation sequencing continues to attract government funding in many fields, including medical science, microbiology, and bio-agriculture. In 2011, we saw positive revenue growth in the pharmaceutical and biotech, academic and government markets, as well as solid growth in the clinical market.
Looking forward, we are optimistic about our growth opportunities in the clinical research market as our broad portfolio of products especially SureFISH, HaloPlex and CGH microarrays are well suited to address customer needs. The addition of HaloPlex has strengthened our target enrichment offerings and sales have exceeded our expectation. We have plans to continue investing in target enrichment as next generation sequencing moves into the research clinic. We are committed to the microarray business and have partnered with a former competitor who is exiting the microarray business to transition their customers onto Agilent microarrays, further growing our installed base. We continue to expand our SureFISH menu of probes and are now at over 450 probes targeting both cancer and constitutional applications including translocation probes targeting leukemia for cancer market. We are always looking selectively at acquisition opportunities to better serve our customers and to drive future growth.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows diagnostics and genomics' margins, expenses and income from operations for 2012 versus 2011, and 2011 versus 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| Total gross margin | 62.9 | % | | 61.0 | % | | 58.7 | % | | 2 ppts | | 2 ppts |
| Operating margin | 16.1 | % | | 12.5 | % | | 7.1 | % | | 4 ppts | | 5 ppts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | 37% | | 4% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 93 |
| | 41% | | 3% |
| Income from operations | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 35 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | 88% | | 92% |
Gross margins improved by 2 percentage points in 2012 compared to 2011. The improved gross margins were due to the acquisition of Dako, lower royalty expenses, due to a decline of certain key royalty-bearing products, and a favorable hedging impact in 2012. Gross margins improved by 2 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to favorable currency impacts, lower royalty expenses, due to a decline of certain key royalty-bearing products, and favorable product mix in favor of higher margin consumable and reagent revenues.
Research and development expenses increased 37 percent in 2012 compared to 2011, due to the acquisition of Dako offset by lower project expenses. Research and development expenses increased 4 percent in 2011 compared to 2010, driven mainly by the Lab901 acquisition.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 41 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was due to the acquisition of Dako, partially offset by decreases in commission expenses and infrastructure expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 3 percent in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the Lab901 acquisition.
Operating margins improved by 4 percentage points in 2012 compared to 2011. Operating margins improved by 5 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010. Factors which led to operating margin improvement over both periods have been explained in the above discussions on better gross margins and well controlled operating expenses.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 2012 increased by $30 million or 88 percent on a revenue increase of $125 million, a 24 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental. Income from operations in 2011 increased by $17 million or 92 percent compared to 2010 on a revenue increase of $24 million, a 69 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental.
Electronic Measurement
Our electronic measurement business provides electronic measurement instruments and systems, software design tools and related services that are used in the design, development, manufacture, installation, deployment and operation of electronics equipment, and microscopy products. Related services include start-up assistance, instrument productivity and application services and instrument calibration and repair. We also offer customization, consulting and optimization services throughout the customer's product lifecycle.
Orders and Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Orders | $ | 3,280 |
| | $ | 3,305 |
| | $ | 2,994 |
| | (1)% | | 10% |
| Net revenue from products | $ | 2,862 |
| | $ | 2,875 |
| | $ | 2,345 |
| | — | | 23% |
| Net revenue from services and other | 453 |
| | 441 |
| | 439 |
| | 3% | | — |
| Total net revenue | $ | 3,315 |
| | $ | 3,316 |
| | $ | 2,784 |
| | — | | 19% |
Electronic measurement orders declined 1 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. Foreign currency movements had a slightly unfavorable impact on the year-over-year growth rate. Growth in our communications test business reflected solid wireless communications demand partially offset by a decline in broadband communications orders. General purpose test was lower year-over-year on weaker industrial and lower aerospace and defense business partially offset by higher computer and semiconductor test orders. On a geographic basis, orders increased 13 percent in the Americas but declined by 3 percent in Japan, 7 percent in Europe, and 11 percent in Asia Pacific excluding Japan. Year-over-year changes in communications test demand contributed to the order growth in the Americas and the decline in Asia Pacific excluding Japan. Electronic measurement orders increased 10 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. Order growth in wireless manufacturing, industrial, and computers and semiconductor test was partially offset by a decline in network monitoring orders associated with the divestiture of the network solutions business.
Electronic measurement revenue was flat in 2012 compared to 2011 on flat demand for both general purpose and communications test. Foreign currency movements had minimal impact on year-over-year growth. Regionally, revenue from the Americas increased 10 percent, reflecting strong communications test business, offset by declines of 1 percent in Japan, 5 percent in Asia Pacific excluding Japan, and 11 percent in Europe. The decline in Europe reflected a broader market slowdown and general economic weakness. Revenue from products was flat year-over-year while service related revenue increased 3 percent due to our installed base. Electronic measurement revenue increased 19 percent in 2011 compared to 2010 on strong demand from industrial, computers and semiconductor, and wireless communications test partially offset by a decrease in network monitoring associated with the divestiture of the networks solutions business.
General purpose test revenue, representing approximately 63 percent of electronic measurement revenue, reflected slight growth in computers and semiconductor business, flat industrial test demand, and a slight decline in aerospace and defense. Growth in the computers and semiconductor business reflected continuing demand for digital test driven in part by the proliferation of high speed data transmission and increased investments in new semiconductor processes and technology partially offset by a decline in semiconductor manufacturing. Uncertain global economic conditions contributed to flat revenue for industrial or general purpose application test. Our aerospace and defense business reflected stronger demand from the United States government offset by softer demand from international customers, including Asia. In 2011, general purpose test represented 63 percent of electronic measurement revenue with strong demand from industrial, computer, and semiconductor test customers.
Communications test revenue, representing approximately 37 percent of electronic measurement revenue, reflected strong wireless manufacturing test demand offset by lower wireless R&D and broadband communications business. Strength in wireless manufacturing was driven by capacity expansion for smartphones and the associated supply chain. Though investments continued in high data rate applications including long-term evolution (“LTE”), economic uncertainty and cautious spending by customers contributed to soft wireless R&D demand. Broadband communications moderated following a period of strong investment associated with the evolution to data-driven services. In 2011, communications test represented 37 percent of electronic measurement revenue, reflecting growth in wireless and broadband communications partially offset by a decline in network monitoring revenue due to the divestiture of the network solutions business.
Looking forward, we expect a cautious spending environment driven by ongoing global economic uncertainty. There continues to be downward pressure on the aerospace and defense market with near-term uncertainty relating to the budget for the United States government. We anticipate continued interest in high-speed digital test applications with limited investment in semiconductor manufacturing capacity. Communications test demand is expected to moderate on decelerating smartphone capacity expansion and conservative spending in R&D.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the electronic measurement business's margins, expenses and income from operations for 2012 versus 2011 and 2011 versus 2010.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2012 over 2011
Change | | 2011 over 2010
Change |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | |
| Total gross margin | 56.9 | % | | 58.4 | % | | 58.4 | % | | (2) ppts | | — |
| Operating margin | 22.7 | % | | 22.9 | % | | 15.7 | % | | — | | 7 ppts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 375 |
| | $ | 379 |
| | $ | 391 |
| | (1)% | | (3)% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 761 |
| | $ | 798 |
| | $ | 798 |
| | (5)% | | — |
| Income from operations | $ | 751 |
| | $ | 760 |
| | $ | 438 |
| | (1)% | | 74% |
Gross margins declined 2 percentage points in 2012 compared to 2011 on flat revenue. The unfavorable impact of a higher proportion of lower gross margin wireless manufacturing business and slightly higher expenses were partially offset by lower variable and incentive pay. Gross margins were flat in 2011 compared to 2010 with the favorable impact of volume offset by the unfavorable impact of currency movements, unfavorable mix with a higher proportion of lower gross margin wireless manufacturing business, increased variable and incentive pay, and higher infrastructure costs.
Research and development expenses declined 1 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. Decreases in variable and incentive pay and infrastructure costs were partially offset by incremental spending associated with new acquisitions and wage increases. Research and development expenses declined 3 percent in 2011 compared to 2010. Lower infrastructure costs and spending reductions of which a portion related to the network solutions business divestiture were partially offset by higher variable and incentive pay and the unfavorable impact of currency movements.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 5 percent in 2012 compared to 2011. Lower variable and incentive pay, infrastructure costs, and commissions were partially offset by wage increases. Selling, general and administrative expenses were flat in 2011 compared to 2010. Lower infrastructure costs and spending reductions partially related to the network solutions divestiture were offset by the unfavorable impact of currency movements and higher variable and incentive pay.
Operating margins were approximately the same in 2012 compared to 2011 on flat revenue; lower gross margins were mostly offset by reductions in operating expenses. Operating margins improved by 7 percentage points in 2011 compared to 2010. Higher revenue volume and lower infrastructure costs were partially offset by increased variable and incentive pay and the unfavorable impact of currency movements.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 20122015 increased by $11 million or 3 percent compared to 2014 on a revenue decrease of $32 million. Income from operations in 2014 increased by $31 million or 9 percent compared to 2013 on a revenue increase of $43 million, a 72 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental. Operating margin incremental is measured by the increase in income from operations compared to the prior period divided by the increase in revenue compared to the prior period.
Diagnostics and Genomics
Our diagnostics and genomics business includes the reagent partnership, pathology, companion diagnostics, genomics and the nucleic acid solutions businesses.
Our diagnostics and genomics business is comprised of three areas of activity providing solutions that include reagents, instruments, software and consumables, which enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the cellular and molecular level. First, our pathology solutions business is focused on product offerings to cancer diagnostics and anatomic pathology workflows. The broad portfolio of offerings includes immunohistochemistry (“IHC”), In Situ Hybridization (“ISH”), Hematoxylin and Eosin (“H&E”) staining and special staining. We also collaborate with a number of major pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also known as companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy. Second, our genomics business includes arrays for DNA mutation detection, genotyping, gene copy number determination, identification of gene rearrangements, DNA methylation profiling, gene expression profiling, as well as Next Generation Sequencing ("NGS") target enrichment. Finally, our nucleic acid solutions business provides equipment and expertise focused on production of synthesized oligonucleotides under pharmaceutical Good Manufacturing Practices ("GMP") conditions for use as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients ("API") in an emerging class of drugs that utilize nucleic acid molecules for disease therapy.
Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 662 |
| | $ | 663 |
| | $ | 635 |
| | — | | 5% |
Diagnostics and genomics business revenue in 2015 was flat compared to 2014, significantly impacted by currency. Foreign currency movements for 2015 had an unfavorable currency impact of 8 percentage points on revenue growth when compared to the same period last year. Geographically, revenue grew 4 percent in the Americas with a 1 percentage point unfavorable currency impact, grew 1 percent in Europe with a 13 percentage point unfavorable currency impact, but declined 25 percent in Japan with a 12 percentage point unfavorable currency impact and declined 2 percent in Asia Pacific excluding Japan with a 6 percentage point unfavorable currency impact.
The positive local currency revenue growth was driven by continued market demand in the nucleic acid solutions business related to therapeutic oligo programs, good revenue performance in pathology and companion diagnostics businesses as well as continued growth momentum of the NGS solution offering within the genomics business. The end markets in diagnostics and clinical research continue to be strong and growing driven by aging population and life style. We saw a revenue growth trend in 2015 in our pathology business as we regained customer confidence once the FDA warning letter was lifted earlier in the year. The growth was driven by Omnis instruments placements throughout the year with record shipments and installations in the last quarter. We also continued to see strong performance from our companion diagnostics business driven by our new and existing pharmaceutical partners. Our genomics business continued to see strong demand for our target enrichment portfolio due to the increasing adoption of next-generation sequencing at a rapid pace by delivering products that suit the changing market in this research and clinical research space.
Looking forward, we are optimistic about our growth opportunities in the diagnostics markets and continue to invest in expanding and improving our applications and solutions portfolio. We remain positive about our revenue growth in our markets, as adoption of our Omnis products, SureSelect and HaloPlex sequencing target enrichment solutions continue. We will continue to invest in research and development, and seek to expand our position in developing countries and emerging markets.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the diagnostics and genomics business's margins, expenses and income from operations for 2015 versus 2014, and 2014 versus 2013.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| Total gross margin | 54.4 | % | | 56.4 | % | | 60.1 | % | | (2) ppts | | (4) ppts |
| Operating margin | 13.3 | % | | 14.0 | % | | 15.0 | % | | (1) ppt | | (1) ppt |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 78 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 83 |
| | (10)% | | 3% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 195 |
| | $ | 195 |
| | $ | 202 |
| | — | | (4)% |
| Income from operations | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 93 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | (5)% | | (3)% |
Gross margins decreased by $92 percentage points in 2015 compared to 2014. Gross margins reflected unfavorable currency movement impact, change in business mix, higher inventory charges, and wage increases. Gross margins in 2014 decreased by 4 percentage points compared to 2013. Gross margins reflected higher costs to address the now lifted FDA warning letter and higher infrastructure expenses and wage increases.
Research and development expenses decreased 10 percent in 2015 when compared to 2014; however remained flat as a percentage of revenue. The decline was mainly due to favorable currency movements and business improvement intiatives partially offset by wage increases. Research and development expenses increased 3 percent in 2014 compared to 2013. The increase was due to higher wages, higher cost to address the now lifted FDA warning letter partially offset by lower infrastructure costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were flat in 2015 compared to 2014, favorable currency movements, and business improvement initiatives and were offset by higher allocated infrastructure expenses following the Keysight separation and wage increases.Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 4 percent in 2014 compared to 2013. The reduction was due to lower program spending and efficiency gains in sales channels partially offset by wage increases.
Operating margins decreased by 1 percentage point in 2015 compared to 2014. The reduction was due to lower gross margins due to higher inventory charges and wage increases. Operating margins decreased by 1 percentage point in 2014 compared to 2013 due to higher costs to address the now lifted FDA warning letter, higher infrastructure expenses and wage increases.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 2015 decreased by $5 million or 5 percent compared to 2014 on a revenue decrease of $1 million. The reduction was due to lower gross margins. Income from operations in 2014 decreased by $2 million or 3 percent compared to 2013 on a revenue increase of $28 million mainly due to higher costs to address the now lifted FDA warning letter.
Agilent CrossLab
The Agilent CrossLab business spans the entire lab with its extensive consumables and services portfolio, which is designed to improve customer outcomes. The majority of the portfolio is vendor neutral, meaning Agilent can serve and supply customers regardless of their instrument purchase choices. Solutions range from chemistries and supplies to services and software helping to connect the entire lab. Key product categories in consumables include GC and LC columns, sample preparation products, custom chemistries, and a large selection of laboratory instrument supplies. Services include startup, operational, training and compliance support, as well as asset management and consultative services that help increase customer productivity. Custom service and consumable bundles are tailored to meet the specific application needs of various industries and to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements.
Net Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| | (in millions) | | | | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,330 |
| | $ | 1,307 |
| | $ | 1,224 |
| | 2% | | 7% |
Agilent CrossLab business revenue in 2015 increased 2 percent compared to 2014. Foreign currency movements for 2015 had an unfavorable impact of 7 percentage points compared to 2014. Revenue growth in 2015 was led by strength in the overall aftermarket service agreement business, the remarketed instrument business, and our chemistries portfolio of LC columns and sample preparation products. Revenue grew 6 percent over 2014 in the Americas with a 3 percentage point unfavorable currency impact. Revenue declined 5 percent below 2014 in Europe with a 13 percentage point unfavorable currency impact. Revenue declined 13 percent below 2014 in Japan with a 14 percentage point unfavorable currency impact. Revenue grew 10 percent over 2014 in Asia Pacific excluding Japan with a 4 percentage point unfavorable currency impact. Agilent CrossLab business revenue in 2014 increased 7 percent compared to 2013. Revenue growth in 2014 was led by strength in the overall service agreement business, the remarketed instrument business, and our portfolio of LC columns and generic supply products.
Agilent CrossLab business saw positive revenue growth in all the key end markets after accounting for the unfavorable currency impact in 2015. Growth was led by the pharmaceutical and biotechnology markets. Revenue in chemical and energy end markets were slower but still reported growth, adjusted for currency movements.
Looking forward, we expect strength in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology markets will continue to offset weakness in the chemical and energy markets in the near term. The drivers of organic revenue growth in the short-term will be our commitment to bringing innovative solutions to market and our focus on expanding the partnerships we have with our customers. Our launch of the Agilent CrossLab brand promise is beginning to help us communicate the value we bring to our customers, and we are optimistic that this will translate into continued long-term growth. We will also remain committed to fiscal discipline by optimizing gross margins across all our product lines.
Gross Margin and Operating Margin
The following table shows the Agilent CrossLab business's margins, expenses and income from operations for 2015 versus 2014 and 2014 versus 2013.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, | | 2015 over 2014
Change | | 2014 over 2013
Change |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | |
| Total gross margin | 49.6 | % | | 48.5 | % | | 48.7 | % | | 1 ppt | | — |
| Operating margin | 22.5 | % | | 23.0 | % | | 24.4 | % | | (1) ppt | | (1) ppt |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | | | | | | | | |
| Research and development | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | 3% | | 45% |
| Selling, general and administrative | $ | 315 |
| | $ | 287 |
| | $ | 266 |
| | 10% | | 8% |
| Income from operations | $ | 299 |
| | $ | 301 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | (1)% | | 1% |
Gross margins increased by 1 percentage point in 2015 compared to 2014, primarily due to the favorable currency hedging gains recognized in 2015, which were partially offset by higher logistical costs. Gross margins remained flat in 2014 compared to 2013.
Research and development expenses increased 3 percent in 2015 when compared to 2014, due to higher project expenses and wage increases. Research and development expenses increased 45 percent in 2014 compared to 2013, due to increased investment into expanding our biocolumn and LC column product portfolio.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 10 percent in 2015 compared to 2014, due to the increase in allocated infrastructure costs following our separation of Keysight and wage increases. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 8 percent in 2014 compared to 2013, due to higher field selling costs and higher infrastructure expenses.
Operating margins declined 1 percentage point in 2015 compared to 2014, due to the increase in allocated infrastructure costs following our separation of Keysight, which were partially offset by the favorable currency hedging gains recognized in 2015. Operating margins decreased 1 percentage point in 2014 compared to 2013, due to the higher infrastructure expenses.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in 2015 decreased by $2 million or 1 percent compared to 2011 on flat revenue, reflecting the net impact of lower gross margins mostly offset by reductions in expenses. Income from operations in 2011 increased by $322 million or 74 percent compared to 20102014 on a revenue increase of $532$23 million. Income from operations in 2014 increased by $2 million or 1 percent compared to 2013 on a revenue increase of $83 million, a 613 percent year-over-year operating margin incremental that reflected the benefits of higher revenue volume and limited expense growth.
incremental.
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our financial position as of October 31, 20122015 consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $2,351$2,003 million as compared to $3,527$2,218 million as of October 31, 2011.2014, which excludes $810 million of cash and cash equivalents held by Keysight.
On November 1, 2014, we completed the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Keysight to Agilent stockholders who received one share of Keysight common stock for every two shares of Agilent held as of the close of business on the record date, October 22, 2014. The separation agreement provided that prior to the distribution, Keysight make a cash distribution to Agilent in an amount equal to $900 million. The distribution of such cash to Agilent was intended to be a return of capital to Agilent that ensures that Keysight had approximately $700 million of total cash immediately following distribution. For the year ended October 31 2015, we transferred a net amount of $734 million to Keysight.
As of October 31, 2012,2015, approximately $2,245$1,780 million of our cash and cash equivalents is held outside of the U.S. in our foreign subsidiaries. Most of the amounts held outside of the U.S. could be repatriated to the U.S. but, under current law, would be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. Agilent has accrued for U.S. federal and state
tax liabilities on the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries except when the earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. Repatriation could result in additional material U.S. federal and state income tax payments in future years. We utilize a variety of funding strategies in an effort to ensure that our worldwide cash is available in the locations in which it is needed.
On June 21, 2012, we completed the acquisition of Dako A/S through the acquisition of 100% of the share capital of Dako A/S, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Denmark (“Dako”), under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. As a result of the acquisition, Dako has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. The consideration paid was approximately $2,143 million, $1,400 million was paid directly to the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy the outstanding debt of Dako. Agilent funded the acquisition using our existing cash. The acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance and the results of Dako are included in Agilent's consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.
We believe our cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, and ability to access capital markets and credit lines will satisfy, for at least the foreseeable future,next twelve months, our liquidity requirements, both globally and domestically, including the following: working capital needs, capital expenditures, business acquisitions, stock repurchases, cash dividends, contractual obligations, commitments, principal and interest payments on debt, and other liquidity requirements associated with our operations.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,228$491 million in 20122015 as compared to $1,260$711 million provided in 2011.2014 and $1,152 million provided in 2013. For the years ended 2014 and 2013, net cash provided by operating activities included the cash provided by Keysight operating activities. We received $65paid approximately $129 million of net taxes in 2015, as compared to net $131 million in interest rate swap proceedstaxes in 2014 and $61net $110 million in respect of a tax sharing settlement with Hewlett Packard Company during2013. Income taxes, including those paid for the Keysight business, were paid by Agilent for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013. The increase in cash paid for income taxes for the year ended October 31, 2011. We paid approximately net $862015 was due to tax payments related to the separation. Operating cash flows in 2014 were impacted by pre-separation costs and separation related taxes, the redemption of senior notes including payments related to accrued interest and the timing of the purchase of shares under the employee stock purchase plan. For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 other assets and liabilities used cash of $262 million, $45 million and provided cash of $8 million, respectively. The increase in the usage of cash for the
year ended October 31, 2015 in other assets and liabilities was largely the result of contributions to defined benefit plans, changes in interest and restructuring accruals, income tax liabilities and transaction tax assets and liabilities.
In 2015, the change in accounts receivable used cash of $24 million, $119 million in taxes in 2012 as compared to net $222014 and provided cash of $14 million in 2011. In 2010, we generated $7182013. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 the change in accounts receivable included $25 million in netof cash used and $44 million of cash provided by operating activities.
In 2012,Keysight, respectively. Days' sales outstanding were 53 days in 2015, 49 days in 2014 and 47 days in 2013. The change in accounts receivablepayable used cash of $26 million in 2015, provided cash of $19 million, provided cash of $11$50 million in 20112014 and used cash of $166$27 million in 2010. Days' sales outstanding were 47 days2013. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 the change in 2012, 45 days in 2011accounts payable included $32 million of cash provided and 50 days in 2010. Accounts payable$24 million of cash used cash of $31 million in 2012, used cash of $35 million in 2011 and provided cash of $113 million in 2010.by Keysight, respectively. Cash used in inventory was $52$24 million in 2012, $2082015, $99 million in 20112014 and $51$100 million in 2010.2013. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 the change in inventory included $31 million and $53 million of cash used by Keysight, respectively. Inventory days on-hand increaseddecreased to 10897 days in 20122015 compared to 100106 days in 20112014 and 87118 days in 2010.2013.
We contributed $30$15 million, $33$30 million and $30 million to our U.S. defined benefit plans in 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 we contributed $15 million and $15 million, respectively, to our U.S. defined benefit plans on behalf of Keysight. We contributed $54$25 million, $59$72 million and $47$89 million to our non-U.S. defined benefit plans in 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 we contributed $41 million and $45 million, respectively, to our non-U.S. defined benefit plans on behalf of Keysight. We did not contributecontributed less than $1 million to our U.S. post-retirement benefit plans in 2012 or 20112015 and contributed $1 million in 2010.both 2014 and 2013. Our non-U.S. defined benefit plans are generally funded ratably throughout the year. Total contributions in 20122015 were $84$40 million or 961 percent less than 2011.2014. Total contributions in 20112014 were $14$103 million or 1814 percent more than in 2010.2013. Our annual contributions are highly dependent on the relative performance of our assets versus our projected liabilities, among other factors. We expect to contribute approximately $84$25 million to our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit plans and $2$1 million to our U.S. post-retirement benefit plans during 2013.2016.
Net Cash Provided by/Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities in 20122015 was $2,372$400 million primarily due to acquisition of Dako and other smaller acquisitionsin 2014 was $230 million as compared to net cash providedused of $1,294$248 million in 2011. In 2010, we2013. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 cash used $1,174in investing activities included $82 million and $85 million of net cash in the investing activities of operations.used by Keysight, respectively.
Investments in property, plant and equipment were $194$98 million in 2012, $1882015, $205 million in 20112014 and $121$195 million in 2010.2013. For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013 investments in plant and equipment included $70 million and $69 million, respectively, related to Keysight. Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment were zero in 2012, $18$12 million in 2011 and $72015, $14 million in 2010.2014 and $2 million in 2013. In 2012,2015 we invested $2,257$74 million in acquisitions of businesses and intangible assets, net of cash acquired compared to $98$13 million in 2011. In 2010, we invested $1,3132014 and $21 million in acquisitions2013. In 2015 we increased our investment in our equity method investment by $1 million. In 2014, there were $25 million of businesses and purchasepurchases of intangible assets whichequity method investments including a $3.5 million loan converted to equity compared with $46 million of purchases of investments including $21 million for equity method investments in 2013. Proceeds from a divestiture was primarily related$3 million in 2015 compared to our acquisition of Varian.$2 million in 2014. Proceeds from the sale of investment securities in 20122015 were $5 million, $16zero, $1 million in 20112014 and $38$12 million in 2010. The amounts2013. We made a payment of and changes$2 million in restricted cash were not materialexchange for the fiscal year ended 2012. In 2011convertible note in 2015. Change in restricted cash decreased $1,545 million mostly due to the reclassification of restricted cash to cash and cash equivalents following the settlement of the World Trade repurchase obligation. Proceeds from divestitures werewas $240 million in 2015 related to our Seahorse Biosciences acquisition and $4 million and zero in 2012, $1 million in 20112014 and $205 million in 2010.2013 respectively.
Net Cash Provided by/Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities in 20122015 was $31$1,068 million compared to $1,693$97 million in 20112014 and $601$554 million in 2013, respectively. The increase in cash used in 2015 when compared to 2014 was largely due to the net cash provided in 2010,transferred to Keysight.
Treasury stock repurchases
On November 22, 2013 we announced that our board of directors had authorized a share repurchase program. The existing program is designed to reduce or eliminate dilution resulting from issuance of stock under the company's employee equity incentive programs to target maintaining a weighted average share count of approximately 335 million diluted shares. For the years ended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 we repurchased 6 million shares for $267 million, 4 million shares for $200 million and 20 million shares for $900 million, respectively. We satisfiedAll such shares and related costs are held as treasury stock and accounted for using the $1,500 million financing obligationcost method.
On May 28, 2015 we announced that our board of World Trade in its entirety on December 10, 2010.directors had approved a new share repurchase program (the "2015 repurchase program"). The 2015 share repurchase program authorizes the purchase of up to $1.14 billion of our common stock through and including November 1, 2018. The 2015 share repurchase program will commence, at the option of the company,
Treasuryon either November 1, 2015, or the date on which we complete the purchase of the remaining $98 million for a total of $365 million of common stock repurchases and dividends
On November 19, 2009in fiscal 2015 under the existing stock repurchase program. Upon commencement, the 2015 share repurchase program replaces our Boardexisting stock repurchase program, which authorized the repurchase of Directors approved a share-repurchase programshares to reduce or eliminate share dilution of basic outstanding shares in connection with issuances of stock under the company'sfrom equity incentive plans.programs. The share-repurchase2015 repurchase program does not require the company to acquire a specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. There is no fixed termination date for the new share-repurchase program.
Dividends
For the yearyears ended October 31, 20122015, 2014 and 2013 cash dividends of $133 million, $176 million and $156 million were paid on the company's outstanding common stock, respectively. On November 19, 2015, we repurchased approximately 5 million shares for $172 million. For the year ended October 31, 2011 we repurchased 12 million shares for $497 million. For the year ended October 31, 2010 we repurchased 13 million shares for $411 million.
We paid our firstdeclared a quarterly dividend of $0.115 per share of common stock, or approximately $38 million which will be paid on April 25, 2012January 27, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 3, 2012. During the year ended October 31, 2012, cash dividends of $0.30 per share, or $104 million were declared and paid on the company's outstanding common stock. On November 16, 2012, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share of common stock, or approximately $35 million which will be paid on January 23, 2013 to shareholders of record as of close of business on December 31, 2012.5, 2016. The timing and amounts of any future dividends are subject to determination and approval by our board of directors.
Credit Facility
On October 20, 2011, weSeptember 15, 2014, Agilent entered into a five-year credit agreement with a financial institution which provides for a $400 million five-year unsecured credit facility that will expire on October 20, 2016. The company may use amounts borrowedSeptember 15, 2019. On June 9, 2015, the commitments under the existing credit facility were increased by $300 million so that the aggregate commitments under the facility for general corporate purposes.now total $700 million. As of October 31, 20122015, the company hashad no borrowings outstanding under the facility. We were in compliance with the covenants for the credit facilitiesfacility during the yearyears ended October 31, 2012.
As a result of the Dako acquisition, we have a credit facility in Danish Krone equivalent of $9 million with a Danish financial institution. During the year ended October 31, 2012 $1 million was repaid2015 and no borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of October 31, 2012.
Short-term debt
On September 9, 2009, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $250 million in senior notes ("2012 senior notes"). The 2012 senior notes matured on September 14, 2012 and were fully redeemed.
In July 2010, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $250 million in senior notes ("2013 senior notes"). The 2013 senior notes were issued at 99.82% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on July 15, 2013, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.50% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on January 15th and July 15th of each year, payments commenced on January 15, 2011. The 2013 senior notes are repayable within one year and have been classified to short-term as of October 31, 2012, see Note 18, "Short-term debt".
All notes issued are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with all of Agilent's other senior unsecured indebtedness. The company incurred issuance costs of $2 million in connection with the 2013 senior notes. These costs were capitalized in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and the costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the senior notes.2014.
Long-term debt
OnIn October 24, 2007, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $600 million in senior notes maturing in 2017 ("2017 senior notes"). The 2017 senior notes were issued at 99.60% of their principal amount,amount. The notes will mature on November 1, 2017, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum, and mature on November 1, 2017. Interestannum. The interest is payable semi-annually on May 1st1st and November 1st1st of each year and payments commenced on May 1, 2008.
On November 25, 2008, we terminated two interest rate swap contracts associated with our 2017 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $400 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination was approximately $43 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 20122015 was $26$2 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2017 senior notes.
On September 9, 2009,October 20, 2014, we settled the company issued anredemption of $500 million of the $600 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of $500 million inour 2017 senior notes maturing in 2015 ("2015 senior notes"). The 2015 senior notes were issued at 99.69% of their principal amount, bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% per annum, and maturedue November 1, 2017 that had been called for redemption on September 14, 2015. Interest is payable semi-annually on March 14th and September 14th of each year, and payments commenced on March 14, 2010.
19, 2014.
On June 6, 2011, we terminated our interest rate swap contracts related to our 2015 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination for these contracts was approximately $31 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 2012 was $18 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2015 senior notes.
In July 2010, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $500 million in senior notes ("2020 senior notes"). The 2020 senior notes were issued at 99.54% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on July 15, 2020, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.00% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on January 15th and July 15th of each year, payments commenced on January 15, 2011.
On August 9, 2011, we terminated our interest rate swap contracts related to our 2020 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination for these contracts was approximately $34 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 20122015 was $29$19 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2020 senior notes.
In September 2012, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $400 million in senior notes ("2022 senior notes"). The senior notes were issued at 99.80% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on October 1, 2022, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.20% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on April 1st and October 1st of each year, payments commencecommenced on April 01,1, 2013. We used part
In June 2013, the company issued aggregate principal amount of the proceeds from the issuance of the 2022$600 million in senior notes to redeem the 2012("2023 senior notes.
All notes issued are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with all of Agilent's other senior unsecured indebtedness.notes"). The company incurred issuance costs of $5 million in connection with the 20172023 senior notes were issued at 99.544% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on July 15, 2023 and incurred $3 millionbear interest at a fixed rate of 3.875% per annum. Interest is payable semi-annually on January 15th and July 15th of each in connection with the 2015, 2020year and 2022 senior notes. These costs were capitalized in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and the costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the senior notes.payments commenced January 15, 2014.
As of October 31, 2012, and as a result of the Dako acquisition,2015, we have a mortgage debt,debts, secured on buildings in Denmark, in Danish Krone equivalent of $44$38 million aggregate principal outstanding with a Danish financial institution. The loan hasloans have a variable interest rate based on 3
months Copenhagen Interbank Rate ("Cibor") and will mature on September 30, 2027. Interest payments are made in March, June, September and December of each year.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other
We have contractual commitments for non-cancelable operating leases. See Note 1718, "Commitments and Contingencies", to our consolidated financial statements for further information on our non-cancelable operating leases.
Our liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which are based on normal ongoing operations of our business and some of which arise from fluctuations related to global economics and markets. Our cash balances are generated and held in many locations throughout the world. Local government regulations may restrict our ability to move cash balances to meet cash needs under certain circumstances. We do not currently expect such regulations and restrictions to impact our ability to pay vendors and conduct operations throughout our global organization.
Contractual Commitments
Our cash flows from operations are dependent on a number of factors, including fluctuations in our operating results, accounts receivable collections, inventory management, and the timing of tax and other payments. As a result, the impact of contractual obligations on our liquidity and capital resources in future periods should be analyzed in conjunction with such factors.
The following table summarizes our total contractual obligations at October 31, 20122015 for Agilent operations and excludes amounts recorded in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
| | | | Less than one year | | One to three years | | Three to five years | | More than five years | Less than one year | | One to three years | | Three to five years | | More than five years |
| Operating leases | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 79 |
| | $ | 36 |
| | $ | 16 |
| $ | 35 |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 34 |
|
| Commitments to contract manufacturers and suppliers | 771 |
| | 47 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| 581 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other purchase commitments | 84 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 53 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Retirement plans | 86 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 26 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 992 |
| | $ | 127 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 16 |
| $ | 695 |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 34 |
|
Operating leases. Commitments under operating leases relate primarily to leasehold property, see Note 17,18, "Commitments and Contingencies".
Commitments to contract manufacturers and suppliers. We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several contract manufacturers to provide manufacturing services for our products. During the normal course of business, we issue purchase orders with estimates of our requirements several months ahead of the delivery dates. However, our agreements with these suppliers usually provide us the option to cancel, reschedule, and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders being placed. Typically purchase orders outstanding with delivery dates within 30 days are non-cancelable. Therefore, only approximately 5538 percent of our reported purchase commitments arising from these agreements are firm, non-cancelable, and unconditional commitments. We expect to fulfill most of our purchase commitments for inventory within one year.
In addition to the above mentioned commitments to contract manufacturers and suppliers, we record a liability for firm, non-cancelable and unconditional purchase commitments for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts consistent with our policy relating to excess inventory. As of October 31, 2012,2015, the liability for our firm, non-cancelable and unconditional purchase commitments was $5 million compared to $5$10 million, as of October 31, 2011.2014 and less than $1 million as of October 31, 2013. These amounts are included in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.
Other purchase commitments. We have categorized "other purchase commitments" related to contracts with professional services suppliers. Typically we can cancel these contracts within 90 days without penalties. For those contracts that are not cancelable within 90 days without penalties, we are disclosing the amountstermination fees and costs or commitments for continued spending that we are obligated to pay to a supplier under each contract in thatcontact's termination period before such contract can be cancelled. Our contractual obligations with these suppliers under "other purchase commitments" were approximately $84$53 million within the next year and $1 million thereafter.year.
Retirement Plans. Commitments under the retirement plans relate to expected contributions to be made to our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit plans and to our post-retirement medical plans for the next year only. Contributions after next year are impractical to estimate.
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as of October 31, 20122015 or October 31, 2011.2014.
On Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table summarizes our total contractual obligations recorded in our consolidated balance sheet pertainingat October 31, 2015 related to our short-term and long-term debt as of October 31, 2012and interest expense (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less than one year | | One to three years | | Three to five years | | More than five years |
| Senior notes | $ | 250 |
| | $ | 500 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 900 |
|
| Other debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
| Total | $ | 250 |
| | $ | 500 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 944 |
|
We have contractual obligations for interest payments on the above debts. Interest rates and payment dates are detailed in "Short-term debt" and "Long-term debt". |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Less than one year | | One to three years | | Three to five years | | More than five years |
| Senior notes | $ | — |
| | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 500 |
| | $ | 1,000 |
|
| Other debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 38 |
|
| Interest expense | 68 |
| | 132 |
| | 123 |
| | 96 |
|
| Total | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 623 |
| | $ | 1,134 |
|
Other long-term liabilities include $320$227 million and $356$286 million of liabilities for uncertain tax positions as of October 31, 20122015 and October 31, 2011,2014, respectively. We are unable to accurately predict when these amounts will be realized or released. However, it is reasonably possible that there could be significant changes to our unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months due to either the expiration of a statute of limitations or a tax audit settlement.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in our sales commitments, anticipated sales, and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries. We hedge future cash flows denominated in currencies other than the functional currency using sales forecasts up to twelve months in advance. Our exposure to exchange rate risks is managed on an enterprise-wide basis. This strategy utilizes derivative financial instruments, including option and forward contracts, to hedge certain foreign currency exposures with the intent of offsetting gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging them. We do not currently and do not intend to utilize derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
Our operations generate non-functional currency cash flows such as revenues, third party vendor payments and inter-company payments. In anticipation of these foreign currency cash flows and in view of volatility of the currency market, we enter into such foreign exchange contracts as are described above to manage our currency risk. Approximately 6357 percent of our revenue in 2015, 61 percent of our revenues in 2012, 64 percent of our revenues in 20112014 and 63 percent of our revenues in 20102013 were generated in U.S. dollars.
We performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10 percent adverse movement in foreign exchange rates to the hedging contracts and the underlying exposures described above. As of October 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, the analysis indicated that these hypothetical market movements would not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, statement of comprehensive income or cash flows.
We are also exposed to interest rate risk due to the mismatch between the interest expense we pay on our loans at fixed rates and the variable rates of interest we receive from cash, cash equivalents and other short-term investments. We have issued long-term debt in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies at fixed interest rates based on the market conditions at the time of financing. We believe that the fair value of our fixed rate debt changes when the underlying market rates of interest change, and we may use interest rate swaps to modify such market risk.
We performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10 percent adverse movement in interest rates relating to the underlying fair value of our fixed rate debt. As of October 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, the sensitivity analyses indicated that a hypothetical 10 percent adverse movement in interest rates would result in an immaterial impact to the fair value of our fixed interest rate debt.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
| | |
| Index to Consolidated Financial Statements | | Page |
| | | |
| Consolidated Financial Statements: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Tothe Stockholders and Board of Directors of Agilent Technologies, Inc.:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financialbalance sheets and the related consolidated statements listed in the index appearing under Item 8of operations, of comprehensive income, of cash flows, and of equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Agilent Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries at October 31, 20122015 and October 31, 2011,2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 20122015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012,2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). because a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for income taxes existed as of that date. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness referred to above is described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the October 31, 2015 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements. The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.management's report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company'scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A, management has excluded Dako A/S (“Dako”) from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2012. We have also excluded Dako from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Dako is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company whose total assets and total net revenue represent less than 3% and less than 2%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended October 31, 2012.
|
| |
| /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP | |
| | |
San Jose, California | |
December 20, 201218, 2015 | |
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) | | 2013 (As Revised) |
| | (in millions, except per share data) | (in millions, except per share data) |
| Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Products | $ | 5,659 |
| | $ | 5,482 |
| | $ | 4,464 |
| $ | 3,146 |
| | $ | 3,185 |
| | $ | 3,083 |
|
| Services and other | 1,199 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 980 |
| 892 |
| | 863 |
| | 811 |
|
| Total net revenue | 6,858 |
| | 6,615 |
| | 5,444 |
| 4,038 |
| | 4,048 |
| | 3,894 |
|
| Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of products | 2,608 |
| | 2,473 |
| | 1,976 |
| 1,496 |
| | 1,568 |
| | 1,525 |
|
| Cost of services and other | 646 |
| | 613 |
| | 538 |
| 501 |
| | 504 |
| | 462 |
|
| Total costs | 3,254 |
| | 3,086 |
| | 2,514 |
| 1,997 |
| | 2,072 |
| | 1,987 |
|
| Research and development | 668 |
| | 649 |
| | 612 |
| 330 |
| | 358 |
| | 337 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 1,817 |
| | 1,809 |
| | 1,752 |
| 1,189 |
| | 1,199 |
| | 1,184 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | 5,739 |
| | 5,544 |
| | 4,878 |
| 3,516 |
| | 3,629 |
| | 3,508 |
|
| Income from operations | 1,119 |
| | 1,071 |
| | 566 |
| 522 |
| | 419 |
| | 386 |
|
| Interest income | 9 |
| | 14 |
| | 20 |
| 7 |
| | 9 |
| | 7 |
|
| Interest expense | (101 | ) | | (86 | ) | | (96 | ) | (66 | ) | | (110 | ) | | (107 | ) |
| Gain on sale of network solutions business, net | — |
| | — |
| | 132 |
| |
| Other income (expense), net | 16 |
| | 33 |
| | 70 |
| 17 |
| | (89 | ) | | 7 |
|
| Income before taxes | 1,043 |
| | 1,032 |
| | 692 |
| |
| Income from continuing operations before taxes | | 480 |
| | 229 |
| | 293 |
|
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (110 | ) | | 20 |
| | 8 |
| 42 |
| | (3 | ) | | 68 |
|
| Income from continuing operations | | 438 |
| | 232 |
| | 225 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax expense (benefit) of $(2), $100 and $57 | | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 509 |
|
| Net income | $ | 1,153 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
| | $ | 684 |
| $ | 401 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
| Net income per share: | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 3.31 |
| | $ | 2.92 |
| | $ | 1.97 |
| |
| Diluted | $ | 3.27 |
| | $ | 2.85 |
| | $ | 1.94 |
| |
| | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - basic: | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | (0.12 | ) | | 0.95 |
| | 1.49 |
|
| Net income per share - basic | | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | $ | 2.15 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - diluted: | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | (0.11 | ) | | 0.93 |
| | 1.48 |
|
| Net income per share - diluted | | $ | 1.20 |
| | $ | 1.62 |
| | $ | 2.13 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 348 |
| | 347 |
| | 347 |
| 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 341 |
|
| Diluted | 353 |
| | 355 |
| | 353 |
| 335 |
| | 338 |
| | 345 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.30 |
| | — |
| | — |
| $ | 0.400 |
| | $ | 0.528 |
| | $ | 0.460 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) | | 2013 (As Revised) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 401 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 734 |
| |
| Other comprehensive income (loss): |
| |
| |
| |
| Unrealized gain on investments, net of tax (expense) benefit of $0, $(1) and $(2) | — |
| | 11 |
| | 7 |
| |
| Amounts reclassified into earnings related to investments, net of tax of $0, $0 and $0 | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| |
| Gain on derivative instruments, net of tax (expense) of $(3), $(5) and $(2) | 8 |
| | 8 |
| | 8 |
| |
| Amounts reclassified into earnings related to derivative instruments, net of tax benefit of $6, $0 and $3 | (12 | ) | | 1 |
| | (10 | ) | |
| Foreign currency translation, net of tax benefit of $24, $8 and $8 | (336 | ) | | (269 | ) | | 1 |
| |
| Net defined benefit pension cost and post retirement plan costs: |
| |
| |
| |
| Change in actuarial net loss, net of tax (expense) benefit of $17, $65, and $(114) | (38 | ) | | (143 | ) | | 228 |
| |
| Change in net prior service benefit, net of tax benefit of $6, $16, and $16 | (11 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (32 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (389 | ) | | (425 | ) | | 202 |
| |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 12 |
| | $ | 124 |
| | $ | 936 |
| |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET |
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) |
| | (in millions, except par value and share data) |
| ASSETS | | | |
| Current assets: | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,003 |
| | $ | 2,218 |
|
| Short-term restricted cash and cash equivalents | 242 |
| | — |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 606 |
| | 626 |
|
| Inventory | 541 |
| | 574 |
|
| Other current assets | 294 |
| | 263 |
|
| Current assets of discontinued operations | — |
| | 1,828 |
|
| Total current assets | 3,686 |
| | 5,509 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 604 |
| | 631 |
|
| Goodwill | 2,366 |
| | 2,507 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 445 |
| | 649 |
|
| Long-term investments | 86 |
| | 96 |
|
| Other assets | 292 |
| | 268 |
|
| Non-current assets of discontinued operations | — |
| | 1,155 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 7,479 |
| | $ | 10,815 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 279 |
| | $ | 302 |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | 221 |
| | 228 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 258 |
| | 260 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 218 |
| | 279 |
|
| Current liabilities of discontinued operations | — |
| | 623 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 976 |
| | 1,692 |
|
| Long-term debt | 1,655 |
| | 1,663 |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | 264 |
| | 209 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 414 |
| | 513 |
|
| Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | — |
| | 1,434 |
|
| Total liabilities | 3,309 |
| | 5,511 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 18) |
|
| |
|
|
| Total equity: | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 125 million shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock; $0.01 par value; 2 billion shares authorized; 611 million shares at October 31, 2015 and 608 million shares at October 31, 2014 issued | 6 |
| | 6 |
|
| Treasury stock at cost; 279 million shares at October 31, 2015 and 273 million shares at October 31, 2014 | (10,074 | ) | | (9,807 | ) |
| Additional paid-in-capital | 9,045 |
| | 8,967 |
|
| Retained earnings | 5,581 |
| | 6,469 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (391 | ) | | (334 | ) |
| Total stockholders' equity | 4,167 |
| | 5,301 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
| Total equity | 4,170 |
| | 5,304 |
|
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 7,479 |
| | $ | 10,815 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 (As Revised) | | 2013 (As Revised) |
| | (in millions) |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 401 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 253 |
| | 384 |
| | 372 |
|
| Accelerated amortization of interest rate swap gain (due to early redemption of debt) | — |
| | (22 | ) | | — |
|
| Share-based compensation | 54 |
| | 96 |
| | 85 |
|
| Excess tax benefit from share-based plans | (8 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Deferred taxes | 70 |
| | (192 | ) | | (4 | ) |
| Excess and obsolete inventory and inventory related charges | 30 |
| | 79 |
| | 48 |
|
| Non-cash restructuring and asset impairment charges | 3 |
| | 23 |
| | 3 |
|
| Net gain on sale of investments | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Net (gain) loss on sale of assets and divestitures | 3 |
| | (10 | ) | | 3 |
|
| Other | 13 |
| | 10 |
| | 3 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net | (24 | ) | | (119 | ) | | 14 |
|
| Inventory | (24 | ) | | (99 | ) | | (100 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (26 | ) | | 50 |
| | (27 | ) |
| Employee compensation and benefits | 8 |
| | 9 |
| | 16 |
|
| Other assets and liabilities | (262 | ) | | (45 | ) | | 8 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 491 |
| | 711 |
| | 1,152 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Investments in property, plant and equipment | (98 | ) | | (205 | ) | | (195 | ) |
| Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment | 12 |
| | 14 |
| | 2 |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of investment securities | — |
| | 1 |
| | 12 |
|
| Proceeds from divestitures | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
|
| Payment to acquire equity method investment | (1 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (21 | ) |
| Payment in exchange for convertible note | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchase of other investments | — |
| | — |
| | (25 | ) |
| Change in restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments, net | (240 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — |
|
| Acquisitions of businesses and intangible assets, net of cash acquired | (74 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (21 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (400 | ) | | (230 | ) | | (248 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 58 |
| | 188 |
| | 161 |
|
| Treasury stock repurchases | (267 | ) | | (200 | ) | | (900 | ) |
| Payment of dividends | (133 | ) | | (176 | ) | | (156 | ) |
| Issuance of senior notes | — |
| | 1,099 |
| | 597 |
|
| Debt issuance costs | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Repayment of senior notes | — |
| | (1,000 | ) | | (250 | ) |
| Purchase of non-controlling interest | — |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) |
| Proceeds from debts and credit facility | — |
| | 87 |
| | — |
|
| Net transfer of cash and cash equivalents to Keysight | (734 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Repayment of debts and credit facility | — |
| | (87 | ) | | — |
|
| Excess tax benefit from share-based plans | 8 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
|
| Net cash used in financing activities | (1,068 | ) | | (97 | ) | | (554 | ) |
| Effect of exchange rate movements | (48 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (26 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,025 | ) | | 353 |
| | 324 |
|
| Change in cash and cash equivalents within current assets of discontinued operations | 810 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 2,218 |
| | 2,675 |
| | 2,351 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 2,003 |
| | $ | 3,028 |
| | $ | 2,675 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSTATEMENT OF EQUITY |
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (in millions, except par value and share data) |
| ASSETS | | | |
| Current assets: | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,351 |
| | $ | 3,527 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 923 |
| | 860 |
|
| Inventory | 1,014 |
| | 898 |
|
| Other current assets | 341 |
| | 284 |
|
| Total current assets | 4,629 |
| | 5,569 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,164 |
| | 1,006 |
|
| Goodwill | 3,025 |
| | 1,567 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 1,086 |
| | 429 |
|
| Long-term investments | 109 |
| | 117 |
|
| Other assets | 523 |
| | 369 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 10,536 |
| | $ | 9,057 |
|
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 461 |
| | $ | 472 |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | 387 |
| | 424 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 420 |
| | 389 |
|
| Short-term debt | 250 |
| | 253 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 375 |
| | 299 |
|
| Total current liabilities | 1,893 |
| | 1,837 |
|
| Long-term debt | 2,112 |
| | 1,932 |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | 554 |
| | 329 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 792 |
| | 643 |
|
| Total liabilities | 5,351 |
| | 4,741 |
|
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) |
|
| |
|
|
| Total equity: | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | | |
| Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 125 million shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
| Common stock; $0.01 par value; 2 billion shares authorized; 595 million shares at October 31, 2012 and 591 million shares at October 31, 2011 issued | 6 |
| | 6 |
|
| Treasury stock at cost; 249 million shares at October 31, 2012 and 244 million shares at October 31, 2011 | (8,707 | ) | | (8,535 | ) |
| Additional paid-in-capital | 8,489 |
| | 8,265 |
|
| Retained earnings | 5,505 |
| | 4,456 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (111 | ) | | 116 |
|
| Total stockholders' equity | 5,182 |
| | 4,308 |
|
| Non-controlling interest | 3 |
| | 8 |
|
| Total equity | 5,185 |
| | 4,316 |
|
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 10,536 |
| | $ | 9,057 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Par Value | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Number of Shares | | Treasury Stock at Cost | | Retained Earnings | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | Non- Controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| | (in millions, except number of shares in thousands) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2012 | 595,259 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,489 |
| | (248,786 | ) | | $ | (8,707 | ) | | $ | 5,505 |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 5,182 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,185 |
|
| Cumulative impact of revision, see Note 2 "Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements" | — |
| | — |
| | (12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Revised Balance as of October 31, 2012 | 595,259 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,477 |
| | (248,786 | ) | | $ | (8,707 | ) | | $ | 5,518 |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 5,183 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,186 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 734 |
| | — |
| | 734 |
| | — |
| | 734 |
|
| Other comprehensive income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 202 |
| | 202 |
| | — |
| | 202 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 936 |
| | |
| 936 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.46 per common share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (156 | ) | | — |
| | (156 | ) | | — |
| | (156 | ) |
| Share-based awards issued | 6,370 |
| | — |
| | 147 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 147 |
| | — |
| | 147 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (20,544 | ) | | (900 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (900 | ) | | — |
| | (900 | ) |
| Tax benefits from share-based awards issued | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 85 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 85 |
| | — |
| | 85 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2013 | 601,629 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,711 |
| | (269,330 | ) | | $ | (9,607 | ) | | $ | 6,096 |
| | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 5,297 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,300 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 549 |
| | — |
| | 549 |
| | — |
| | 549 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (425 | ) | | (425 | ) | | — |
| | (425 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 124 |
| | | | 124 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.528 per common share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (176 | ) | | — |
| | (176 | ) | | — |
| | (176 | ) |
| Change in non-controlling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Share-based awards issued | 6,261 |
| | — |
| | 170 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 170 |
| | — |
| | 170 |
|
| Adjustment to cumulative excess tax benefits realized from share based awards issued, see Note 5, "Share-based Compensation" | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Tax benefits from share-based awards issued | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (3,594 | ) | | (200 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (200 | ) | | — |
| | (200 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 96 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 96 |
| | — |
| | 96 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2014 | 607,890 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,967 |
| | (272,924 | ) | | $ | (9,807 | ) | | $ | 6,469 |
| | $ | (334 | ) | | $ | 5,301 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,304 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 401 |
| | — |
| | 401 |
| | — |
| | 401 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (389 | ) | | (389 | ) | | — |
| | (389 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 12 |
| | | | 12 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.40 per common share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (133 | ) | | — |
| | (133 | ) | | — |
| | (133 | ) |
| Distribution of Keysight | — |
| | — |
| | (28 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1,156 | ) | | 332 |
| | (852 | ) | | — |
| | (852 | ) |
| Share-based awards issued | 2,964 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 44 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
| Tax benefit from share based awards issued | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6,471 | ) | | (267 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (267 | ) | | — |
| | (267 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 54 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 54 |
| | — |
| | 54 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2015 | 610,854 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 9,045 |
| | (279,395 | ) | | $ | (10,074 | ) | | $ | 5,581 |
| | $ | (391 | ) | | $ | 4,167 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 4,170 |
|
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (in millions) |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 1,153 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
| | $ | 684 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 301 |
| | 253 |
| | 202 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 74 |
| | 72 |
| | 66 |
|
| Deferred taxes | (158 | ) | | 38 |
| | (109 | ) |
| Excess and obsolete inventory and inventory related charges | 30 |
| | 30 |
| | 30 |
|
| Non-cash restructuring and asset impairment charges | 1 |
| | 10 |
| | 26 |
|
| Net gain on sale of investments | (4 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Net (gain) loss on sale of assets and divestitures | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | (127 | ) |
| Other | 5 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net | 19 |
| | 11 |
| | (166 | ) |
| Inventory | (52 | ) | | (208 | ) | | (51 | ) |
| Accounts payable | (31 | ) | | (35 | ) | | 113 |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | (54 | ) | | 24 |
| | 17 |
|
| Interest rate swap proceeds | — |
| | 65 |
| | — |
|
| Other assets and liabilities | (58 | ) | | (16 | ) | | 35 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,228 |
| | 1,260 |
| | 718 |
|
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | | | |
| Investments in property, plant and equipment | (194 | ) | | (188 | ) | | (121 | ) |
| Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment | — |
| | 18 |
| | 7 |
|
| Proceeds from lease receivable | 80 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from the sale of investment securities | 5 |
| | 16 |
| | 38 |
|
| Proceeds from divestitures, net | — |
| | 1 |
| | 205 |
|
| Change in restricted cash, cash equivalents and investments, net | — |
| | 1,545 |
| | 10 |
|
| Purchase of non-controlling interest | (6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisitions of businesses and intangible assets, net of cash acquired | (2,257 | ) | | (98 | ) | | (1,313 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (2,372 | ) | | 1,294 |
| | (1,174 | ) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | | | |
| Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans | 100 |
| | 304 |
| | 299 |
|
| Treasury stock repurchases | (172 | ) | | (497 | ) | | (411 | ) |
| Payment of dividends | (104 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Issuance of senior notes | 399 |
| | — |
| | 747 |
|
| Debt issuance costs | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (5 | ) |
| Repayment of senior notes | (250 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Repayment of debts and credit facility | (1 | ) | | (1,500 | ) | | (29 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (31 | ) | | (1,693 | ) | | 601 |
|
| Effect of exchange rate movements | (1 | ) | | 17 |
| | 25 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (1,176 | ) | | 878 |
| | 170 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 3,527 |
| | 2,649 |
| | 2,479 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 2,351 |
| | $ | 3,527 |
| | $ | 2,649 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Par Value | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Number of Shares | | Treasury Stock at Cost | | Retained Earnings | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | Non- Controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| | (in millions, except number of shares in thousands) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2009 | 566,067 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 7,552 |
| | (219,919 | ) | | $ | (7,627 | ) | | $ | 2,760 |
| | $ | (185 | ) | | $ | 2,506 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 2,514 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 684 |
| | — |
| | 684 |
| | — |
| | 684 |
|
| Change in unrealized gain on investments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
| Losses reclassified into earnings related to derivative instruments, net of tax of $1 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (6 | ) | | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) |
| Change in foreign currency translation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70 |
| | 70 |
| | — |
| | 70 |
|
| Change in net defined benefit pension and post retirement plan costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net gain, net of tax of $9 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53 |
| | 53 |
| | — |
| | 53 |
|
| Net prior service cost | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (25 | ) | | (25 | ) | | — |
| | (25 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 781 |
| | — |
| | 781 |
|
| Share-based awards issued | 12,760 |
| | — |
| | 288 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 288 |
| | — |
| | 288 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (12,764 | ) | | (411 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (411 | ) | | — |
| | (411 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 64 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 64 |
| | — |
| | 64 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2010 | 578,827 |
| | 6 |
| | 7,904 |
| | (232,683 | ) | | (8,038 | ) | | 3,444 |
| | (88 | ) | | 3,228 |
| | 8 |
| | 3,236 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,012 |
| | — |
| | 1,012 |
| | — |
| | 1,012 |
|
| Change in unrealized gain on investments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) |
| Losses reclassified into earnings related to derivative instruments, net of tax benefit of $(2) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
| Change in foreign currency translation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 94 |
| | 94 |
| | — |
| | 94 |
|
| Change in net defined benefit pension and post retirement plan costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss, net of tax benefit of $(3) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (38 | ) | | (38 | ) | | — |
| | (38 | ) |
| Net prior service gain | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 149 |
| | 149 |
| | — |
| | 149 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1,216 |
| | — |
| | 1,216 |
|
| Share-based awards issued | 11,841 |
| | — |
| | 289 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 289 |
| | — |
| | 289 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11,603 | ) | | (497 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (497 | ) | | — |
| | (497 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 72 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 72 |
| | — |
| | 72 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2011 | 590,668 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,265 |
| | (244,286 | ) | | $ | (8,535 | ) | | $ | 4,456 |
| | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 4,308 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 4,316 |
|
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY — (Continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares | | Par Value | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Number of Shares | | Treasury Stock at Cost | | Retained Earnings | | Total Stockholders' Equity | | Non- Controlling Interests | | Total Equity |
| | (in millions, except number of shares in thousands) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2011 | 590,668 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,265 |
| | (244,286 | ) | | $ | (8,535 | ) | | $ | 4,456 |
| | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 4,308 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 4,316 |
|
| Components of comprehensive income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,153 |
| | — |
| | 1,153 |
| | — |
| | 1,153 |
|
| Change in unrealized gain on investments, net of tax benefit of $(8) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
| Change in unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax of $1 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
| Gains reclassified into earnings related to derivative instruments, net of tax of $0 | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) | | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Change in foreign currency translation | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (28 | ) | | (28 | ) | | — |
| | (28 | ) |
| Change in net defined benefit pension and post retirement plan costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss, net of tax benefit of $(61) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (175 | ) | | (175 | ) | | — |
| | (175 | ) |
| Net prior service loss, net of tax benefit of $(17) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (31 | ) | | (31 | ) | | — |
| | (31 | ) |
| Total comprehensive income | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 926 |
| | — |
| | 926 |
|
| Cash dividends declared ($0.30 per common share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (104 | ) | | — |
| | (104 | ) | | — |
| | (104 | ) |
| Change in non-controlling interest | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Share-based awards issued | 4,591 |
| | — |
| | 84 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 84 |
| | — |
| | 84 |
|
| Cumulative excess tax benefits realized from share-based awards issued | — |
| | — |
| | 66 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 66 |
| | — |
| | 66 |
|
| Repurchase of common stock | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4,500 | ) | | (172 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (172 | ) | | — |
| | (172 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| | — |
| | 74 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 74 |
| | — |
| | 74 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2012 | 595,259 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8,489 |
| | (248,786 | ) | | $ | (8,707 | ) | | $ | 5,505 |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 5,182 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,185 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Overview. Agilent Technologies Inc. ("we", "Agilent" or the "company"), incorporated in Delaware in May 1999, is a measurement company, providing core bio-analytical and electronic measurement solutions to theglobal leader in life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics, communicationsapplied chemical markets, providing application focused solutions that includes instruments, software, services and electronics, industries.consumables for the entire laboratory workflow.
Acquisition of Dako A/S.Keysight Separation. On June 21, 2012,November 1, 2014, we completed our acquisition of Dako A/S through the acquisitiondistribution of 100% of the outstanding common shares of Keysight Technologies, Inc. ("Keysight") to Agilent stockholders who received one share capital of Dako A/S, a limited liability company incorporated under the lawsKeysight common stock for every two shares of Denmark (“Dako”), under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. Dako provides antibodies, reagents, scientific instruments and software primarily to customers in pathology laboratories. As a resultAgilent held as of the acquisition, Dako became a wholly-owned subsidiaryclose of Agilent.business on the record date, October 22, 2014. The consideration paid was approximately $2,143 million,historical results of which $1,400 million was paid directly to the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy the outstanding debt of Dako. Agilent funded the acquisition using existing cash. The acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidanceoperations and the resultsfinancial position of DakoKeysight are included in Agilent'sthe consolidated financial statements of Agilent and are reported as discontinued operations within this Form 10-K.
Exit of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Business. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, we made the decision to cease the manufacture and sale of our nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) product line within our life sciences and applied markets segment. In connection with the exit from the date of acquisition. The acquisition of Dakothis business, we recorded approximately $6 million and its portfolio is another step to increase our growth$68 million in several rapidly expanding areas of diagnostics, including anatomic pathologyrestructuring and molecular diagnostics, as well as strengthen our existing offerings with a focus on product development to helpother related costs in the fight against cancer.2015 and 2014, respectively. For additional details related to the acquisitionexit of Dako,the NMR business see Note 3, "Acquisitions"15, "Exit of NMR Business". We will continue to provide service support to the NMR installed base.
Acquisition of Varian, Inc.New Segment Structure. On May 14, 2010,In November 2014, we completedannounced a change in organizational structure designed to better serve our acquisition of Varian, Inc. ("Varian"), a leading supplier of scientific instrumentation and associated consumables forcustomers. Our life science andsciences business, excluding the nucleic acid solutions division, together with the chemical analysis market applications, by means ofbusiness combined to form a merger of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries withnew segment called life sciences and into Varian such that Varian became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. The $1.5 billion total purchase price of Varian included $52 cash per share of Varian's outstanding common stock including vestedapplied markets business. Our diagnostics and non-vested in-the-money stock options at $52 cash per share less their exercise price. We financed the purchase price of Varian using the proceeds from our September 2009 offering of senior notes and other existing cash. The Varian merger has been accounted for in accordancegenomics businesses combined with the authoritative accounting guidance and the results of Varian are included in Agilent's consolidated financial statementsnucleic acid solutions division from the date of merger. For additional details related to the acquisition of Varian, see Note 3, "Acquisitions ".
Sale of Network Solutions Division. On May 1, 2010, we completed the sale of the Network Solutions Division (“NSD”) of our electronic measurement business to JDS Uniphase Corporation (“JDSU”), a leading communications test and measurement company. JDSU paid Agilent $160 million and we recorded a net gain on the sale of NSD of $132 million in fiscal 2010. NSD includes Agilent's network assurance solutions, network protocol test and drive test products. The results of operations of NSD were not significant to the income from operations of Agilent for the year ended October 31, 2010.
Sale of Hycor Biomedical, Inc. On February 2, 2010, the company sold Hycor Biomedical Inc., a subsidiary of Agilent and part of our life sciences business and became the diagnostics and genomics segment. Finally, the Agilent CrossLab segment was formed from the services and consumables businesses previously part of the life sciences and chemicals analysis businesses. Financial reporting under this new structure is included within this report on Form 10-K and historical financial segment information has been recast to Linden LLC, a Chicago-based healthcare private equity firm. Hycor is a global manufacturer and marketer of in-vitro diagnostics products.conform to this new presentation within our financial statements.
Basis of presentation. The accompanying financial data has been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and is in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Our fiscal year end is October 31. Unless otherwise stated, all years and dates refer to our fiscal year.
Reclassifications. Certain prior year financial statement and disclosure amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation with no impact on previously reported net income.
Management is responsible for the fair presentation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and has full responsibility for their integrity and accuracy. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our consolidated balance sheet, statement of operations, statement of cash flows and statement of stockholders' equity for all periods presented.
Principles of consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and our wholly- and majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Revision of Services and other and Product Net Revenues and related Cost of Sales.In 2015 we revised amounts shown in our consolidated statement of operations to more accurately reflect the character of items delivered to customers. Our diagnostic and genomics segment identified a stream of service revenues that had been presented as product revenue in previous years. We have now revised those years’ presentation to show the revenue within services and other. The cost of sales associated with these newly identified service revenues has also been revised to align with the new presentation. For the year ended October 31, 2014 service and other revenue increased $21 million and service and other cost of sales increased $19 million with corresponding reductions in product revenue and cost of sales. For the year ended October 31, 2013 service and other revenue increased $17 million and service and other cost of sales increased$12 million with corresponding reductions in product revenue and cost of sales.These corrections to the classifications are not considered to be material to current or prior periods and had no impact to our consolidated statement of operations.
Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the company in the future, actual results may be different from the estimates. Our critical accounting policies are those that affect our financial statements materially and involve difficult, subjective or complex judgments by management. Those policies are revenue recognition, valuation of goodwill and purchased intangible assets, inventory valuation, share-based compensation, retirement and post-retirement plan assumptions, valuation of goodwill and purchased intangible assetsrestructuring and accounting for income taxes.
Revenue recognition. We enter into agreements to sell products (hardware and/or software), services and other arrangements (multiple element arrangements) that include combinations of products and services.
We recognize revenue, net of trade discounts and allowances, provided that (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred, (3) the price is fixed or determinable and (4) collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer for products, or when the service has been provided. We consider the price to be fixed or determinable when the price is not subject to refund or adjustments. We consider arrangements with extended payment terms not to be fixed or determinable, and accordingly we defer revenue until amounts becomefor these sales arrangements for which the payment is not yet due. At the time of the transaction, we evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers to determine the appropriate timing of revenue recognition.
Product revenue. Our product revenue is generated predominantly from the sales of various types of test equipment.analytical instrumentation. Product revenue, including sales to resellers and distributors, is reduced for estimated returns when appropriate. For sales or arrangements that include customer-specified acceptance criteria, including those where acceptance is required upon achievement of performance milestones, revenue is recognized after the acceptance criteria have been met. For products that include installation, if the installation meets the criteria to be considered a separate element, product revenue is recognized upon delivery, and recognition of installation revenue is delayed until the installation is complete. Otherwise, neither the product nor the installation revenue is recognized until the installation is complete.
Where software is licensed separately, revenue is recognized when the software is delivered and has been transferred to the customer or, in the case of electronic delivery of software, when the customer is given access to the licensed software programs.
We also evaluate whether collection of the receivable is probable, the fee is fixed or determinable and whether any other undelivered elements of the arrangement exist on which a portion of the total fee would be allocated based on vendor-specific objective evidence.
Service revenue. Revenue from services includes extended warranty, customer and software support, consulting including companion diagnostics and training and education. Service revenue is deferred and recognized over the contractual period or as services are rendered and accepted by the customer. For example, customer support contracts are recognized ratably over the contractual period, while training revenue is recognized as the training is provided to the customer. In addition the four revenue recognition criteria described above must be met before service revenue is recognized.
Revenue Recognition for Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Our multiple-element arrangements are generally comprised of a combination of measurement instruments, installation or other start-up services, and/or software and/or support or services. Hardware and software elements are typically delivered at the same time and revenue is recognized upon delivery once title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Delivery of installation, start-up services and other services varies based on the complexity of the equipment, staffing levels in a geographic location and customer preferences, and can range from a few days to a few months. Service revenue is deferred and recognized over the contractual period or as services are rendered and accepted by the customer. Revenue from the sale of software products that are not required to deliver the tangible product's essential functionality are accounted for under software revenue recognition rules which require vendor specific objective evidence ("VSOE")(VSOE) of fair value to allocate revenue in a multiple element arrangement. Our arrangements generally do not include any provisions for cancellation, termination, or refunds that would significantly impact recognized revenue.
We have evaluated the deliverables in our multiple-element arrangements and concluded that they are separate units of accounting if the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis and for an arrangement that includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in our control. We allocate revenue to each element in our multiple-element arrangements based upon their relative selling prices. We determine the selling price for each deliverable based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on VSOE if available, third-party evidence ("TPE")(TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price ("ESP")(ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Revenue allocated to each element is then recognized when the basic revenue recognition criteria for that element have been met.
We use VSOE of selling price in the selling price allocation in all instances where it exists. VSOE of selling price for
products and services is determined when a substantial majority of the selling prices fall within a reasonable range when sold separately. TPE of selling price can be established by evaluating largely interchangeable competitor products or services in standalone sales to similarly situated customers. As our products contain a significant element of proprietary technology and the solution offered differs substantially from that of competitors, it is difficult to obtain the reliable standalone competitive pricing necessary to establish TPE. ESP represents the best estimate of the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a standalone basis. We determine ESP for a product or service by using historical selling prices which reflect multiple factors including, but not limited to customer type, geography, market conditions, competitive landscape, gross margin objectives
and pricing practices. The determination of ESP is made through consultation with and approval by management. We may modify or develop new pricing practices and strategies in the future. As these pricing strategies evolve wechanges may modify our pricing practices in the future, which may result in changesoccur in ESP. The aforementioned factors may result in a different allocation of revenue to the deliverables in multiple element arrangements, which may change the pattern and timing of revenue recognition for these elements but will not change the total revenue recognized for the arrangement.
Deferred revenue. Deferred revenue represents the amount that is allocated to undelivered elements in multiple element arrangements. We limit the revenue recognized to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services or meeting other specified performance conditions.
Accounts receivable, net. Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Such accounts receivable has been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We determine the allowance based on customer specific experience and the aging of such receivables, among other factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 was not material. We do not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to our customers. Accounts receivable are also recorded net of product returns.
Share-based compensation.Shipping and handling costs. ForOur shipping and handling costs charged to customers are included in net revenue, and the years ended 2012, 2011 and 2010, we accounted for share-based awards made to our employees and directors including employee stock option awards, restricted stock units, employee stock purchases made under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") and performance share awards under Agilent Technologies, Inc. Long-Term Performance Program ("LTPP") using the estimated grant date fair value methodassociated expense is recorded in cost of accounting. Under the fair value method, we recorded compensation expenseproducts for all share-based awards of $76 million in 2012, $73 million in 2011 and $66 million in 2010.periods presented.
Inventory. Inventory is valued at standard cost, which approximates actual cost computed on a first-in, first-out basis, not in excess of market value. We assess the valuation of our inventory on a periodic basis and make adjustments to the value for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based on estimates about future demand. The excess balance determined by this analysis becomes the basis for our excess inventory charge. Our excess inventory review process includes analysis of sales forecasts, managing product rollovers and working with manufacturing to maximize recovery of excess inventory.
Warranty. Our standard warranty terms typically extend for one year from the date of delivery. We accrue for standard warranty costs based on historical trends in warranty charges as a percentage of net product revenue. The accrual is reviewed regularly and periodically adjusted to reflect changes in warranty cost estimates. Estimated warranty charges are recorded within cost of products at the time products are sold. See Note 16, "Guarantees".
Taxes on income. Income tax expense or benefit is based on income or loss before taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized principally for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts.
Shipping and handling costs. Our shipping and handling costs charged to customers are included in net revenue, and the associated expense is recorded in cost of products for all periods presented.
Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets. In September 2011,Under the FASB approved changes toauthoritative guidance we have the goodwill impairment guidance which are intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual impairment test. The changes provide entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The revisedaccounting standard gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether performing the current two-step test is necessary. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not (i.e. >greater than 50% chance) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test will be required. Otherwise, no further testing will be required.
The revised guidance includes examples of events and circumstances that might indicate that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying amount. These include macro-economic conditions such as deterioration in the entity's operating environment
or industry or market considerations; entity-specific events such as increasing costs, declining financial performance, or loss of key personnel; or other events such as an expectation that a reporting unit will be sold or a sustained decrease in the stock price on either an absolute basis or relative to peers. Agilent opted to early adopt this guidance for the year ended October 31, 2011.
If it is determined, as a result of the qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the provisions of authoritative guidance require that we perform a two-step impairment test on goodwill. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The second step (if necessary) measures the amount of impairment by applying fair-value-based tests to the individual assets and liabilities within each reporting unit. As defined in the authoritative guidance, a reporting unit is an operating segment, or one level below an operating segment. We aggregatedaggregate components of an operating segment that have similar economic characteristics into our reporting units. Subsequent to October 31, 2011, we formed a fourth segment, diagnostics and genomics, from a portion of our life sciences segment. As a result, Agilent now has four segments, life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement, which are the same as our reporting units.
In fiscal year 2012,2015, we assessed goodwill impairment for our three reporting units;units which consisted of three segments: life sciences chemical analysis,and applied markets, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement. Based on our results of our qualitativeAgilent CrossLab. Due to the new segment structure in November 2014 we performed a quantitative test for goodwill impairment byof the three reporting unit,units, as of September 30, 2012, we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that2015. Based on the results of our testing, the fair value of each of ourthese reporting units life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement isare greater than their respective carrying values. Each quarter we review the events and circumstances to determine if goodwill impairment is indicated. There was no impairment of goodwill during the years ended October 31, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010.2013.
Purchased intangible assets consist primarily of acquired developed technologies, proprietary know-how, trademarks, and customer relationships and are amortized using the best estimate of the asset's useful life that reflect the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed or used up or a straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 6 months to 15 years. In-process research and development ("IPR&D") is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter. When the IPR&D project is complete, it is reclassified as an amortizable purchased intangible asset and is amortized
over its estimated useful life. If an IPR&D project is abandoned, Agilent will record a charge for the value of the related intangible asset to Agilent's condensed consolidated statement of operations in the period it is abandoned.
In July 2012, the FASB simplified the guidance for testing for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. The changes are intended to reduce compliance costs. Agilent's indefinite-lived intangible assets are in the IPR&D intangible assets. The revisedaccounting guidance allows a qualitative approach for testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, similar to the recently issued impairment testing guidance for goodwill and allows the option to first assess qualitative factors (events and circumstances) that could have affected the significant inputs used in determining the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to determine whether it is more likelymore-likely-than-not (i.e. greater than not (meaning a likelihood of more than 50 percent)50% chance) that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. An organization may choose to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to calculating its fair value. The amendments are effectiveWe performed a qualitative test for annualimpairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets as of September 30, 2015. Based on the results of our qualitative testing, we believe that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets is greater than their respective carrying values. Each quarter we review the events and interimcircumstances to determine if impairment tests performed for fiscalof indefinite-lived intangible asset is indicated. In the years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. Agilent adopted this guidance forended October 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recorded an impairment of $3 million, $4 million and zero, respectively due to the cancellation of certain IPR&D projects. In addition, in the year ended October 31, 2012. We2014, we also recorded an$12 million of impairment of $1other intangibles due to the exit of our NMR business.
Share-based compensation. For the years ended 2015, 2014 and 2013, we accounted for share-based awards made to our employees and directors including employee stock option awards, restricted stock units, employee stock purchases made under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") and performance share awards under Agilent Technologies, Inc. Long-Term Performance Program ("LTPP") using the estimated grant date fair value method of accounting. Under the fair value method, we recorded compensation expense, in continuing operations, for all share-based awards of $55 million in 2015, $59 million in 2012, relating2014 and $51 million in 2013. For the stock option and long term performance plan grants in 2015 we are now using a volatility measure derived from a selection of our peer companies. In prior periods, we used Agilent stock historical volatility. We currently consider this method to not be reflective of our future volatility due to the separation of Keysight. See Note 5, "Share-based compensation" for additional information.
Retirement and post-retirement plans. Substantially all of our employees are covered under various defined benefit and/or defined contribution retirement plans. Additionally we sponsor post-retirement health care benefits for our eligible U.S. employees. Assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations and the expense for these plans are derived annually. See Note 16, “Retirement plans and post-retirement pension plans” for additional information.
Restructuring and exit of NMR business. The main components of expenses are related to workforce reductions, assets impairments and write-downs and special charges to inventory, which mainly relates to exiting of one of our businesses. Workforce reduction charges are accrued when payment of benefits that the employees are entitled to becomes probable and the amounts can be estimated. We have also assessed the recoverability of our long-lived assets, by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted future cash flows. Asset impairments primarily consist of property, plant and equipment and are based on an IPR&D projectestimate of the amounts and timing of future cash flows related to the expected future remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of buildings and equipment net of costs to sell. The charges related to inventory include estimated future inventory disposal payments that was abandoned. No impairments werewe are contractually obliged to make to our suppliers and inventory written-down to net realizable value. If the amounts and timing of cash flows from restructuring activities are significantly different from what we have estimated, the actual amount of restructuring and asset impairment charges could be materially different, either higher or lower, than those we have recorded.
Taxes on income. Income tax expense or benefit is based on income or loss before taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized principally for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts. See Note 6, "Income Taxes" for more information.
Warranty. Our standard warranty terms typically extend for one year from the date of delivery. We accrue for standard warranty costs based on historical trends in warranty charges as a percentage of net product revenue. The accrual is reviewed regularly and periodically adjusted to reflect changes in warranty cost estimates. Estimated warranty charges are recorded in 2011 and 2010.within cost of products at the time products are sold. See Note 17, "Guarantees".
Advertising. Advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred and amounted to $5025 million in 20122015, $5531 million in 20112014 and $4528 million in 20102013.
Research and development. Costs related to research, design and development of our products are charged to research and development expense as they are incurred.
Sales Taxes. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are not included in our revenue.
Net income per share. Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income - the numerator - by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding - the denominator - during the period excluding the dilutive effect of stock options and other employee stock plans. Diluted net income per share gives effect to all potentially dilutivepotential common stock equivalentsshares outstanding during the period.period unless the effect is anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of share-based awards is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method, which includes consideration of unamortized share-based compensation expense, the tax benefits and shortfalls charged to additional paid-in capital and the dilutive effect of in-the-money options and non-vested restricted stock units. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, and unamortized share-based compensation expense lessand tax benefits or shortfalls isare assumed proceeds to be used to repurchase hypothetical shares. See Note 6,7, "Net Income Per Share".
Cash, cash equivalents and short term investments. We classify investments as cash equivalents if their original or remaining maturity is three months or less at the date of purchase. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
As of October 31, 20122015, approximately $2.2 billion1,780 million of our cash and cash equivalents is held outside of the U.S. in our foreign subsidiaries. Under current tax laws, most of the cash could be repatriated to the U.S. but most of it would be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. Our cash and cash equivalents mainly consist of short term deposits held at major global financial institutions, institutional money market funds, and similar short duration instruments with original maturities of 90 days or less. We continuously monitor the creditworthiness of the financial institutions and institutional money market funds in which we invest our funds.
We classify investments as short-term investments if their original maturities are greater than three months and their remaining maturities are one year or less. Currently, we have no short-term investments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.The carrying values of certain of our financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued compensation and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The fair value of long-term equity investments is determined using quoted market prices for those securities when available. For those long-term equity investments accounted for under the cost or equity method, their carrying value approximates their estimated fair value. Equity method investments are reported at the amount of the company’s initial investment and adjusted each period for the company’s share of the investee’s income or loss and dividend paid. The fair value of our short-term and long-term debt, calculated from quoted prices which are primarily Level 1 inputs under the accounting guidance fair value hierarchy, exceeds the carrying value by approximately $4$30 million and $210$53 million, respectively, as of October 31, 20122015. and 2014, respectively. The fair value of foreign currency contracts used for hedging purposes is estimated internally by using inputs tied to active markets. These inputs, for example, interest rate yield curves, foreign exchange rates, and forward and spot prices for currencies are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. See also Note 12,13, "Fair Value Measurements" for additional information on the fair value of financial instruments.
Concentration of credit risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject Agilent to significant concentration of credit risk include money market fund investments, time deposits and demand deposit balances. These investments are categorized as cash and cash equivalents and long-term investments.equivalents. In addition, Agilent has credit risk from derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities and accounts receivable. We invest in a variety of financial instruments and limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution. We have a comprehensive credit policy in place and credit exposure is monitored on an ongoing basis.
Credit risk with respect to our accounts receivable is diversified due to the large number of entities comprising our customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. Credit evaluations are performed on customers requiring credit over a certain amount and we sell the majority of our products through our direct sales force. Credit risk is mitigated through collateral such as letter of credit, bank guarantees or payment terms like cash in advance. Credit evaluation is performed by an independent team to ensure proper segregation of duties. No single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of combined accounts receivable as of October 31, 20122015, or 20112014.
Derivative instruments. Agilent is exposed to global foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risks in the normal course of business. We enter into foreign exchange hedging contracts, primarily forward contracts and purchased options and, in the past, interest rate swaps to manage financial exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In the vast majority of cases, these contracts are designated at inception as hedges of the related foreign currency or interest exposures. Foreign currency exposures include committed and anticipated revenue and expense transactions and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the subsidiary. Interest rate exposures are associated with the company's fixed-rate debt. For option contracts, we exclude time value from the measurement of effectiveness.
To qualify for hedge accounting, contracts must reduce the foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risk otherwise inherent in the amount and duration of the hedged exposures and comply with established risk management policies; foreign exchange hedging contracts generally mature within twelve months and interest rate swaps, if any, mature at the same time as the maturity of the debt. In order to manage foreign currency exposures in a few limited jurisdictions such as China, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting. In such circumstances, the local foreign currency exposure is offset by contracts owned by the parent company. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, changes in value of the derivative are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the current period, along with the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedges, changes in the value of the effective portion of the derivative instrument is recognized in accumulated comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders' equity. Amounts associated with cash flow hedges are reclassified and recognized in income when either the forecasted transaction occurs or it becomes probable the forecasted transaction will not occur. Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value
and changes in the fair values are recorded in the income statement in the current period. Derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements and qualify for net presentationare disclosed gross in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of the ineffective portion of derivative instruments are recognized in earnings in the current period. Ineffectiveness in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013 was not significant.material. Cash flows from derivative instruments are classified in the statement of cash flows in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged or economically hedged item, primarily in operating activities.
Property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Additions, improvements and major renewals are capitalized; maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from our general ledger, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statement of operations. Buildings and improvements are depreciated over the lesser of their useful lives or the remaining term of the lease and machinery and equipment over three to ten years.years. We use the straight-line method to depreciate assets.
Leases. We lease buildings, machinery and equipment under operating leases for original terms ranging generally from 1one year to 20twenty years. Certain leases contain renewal options for periods up to 6six years. In addition, we lease equipment to customers in connection with our diagnostics business using both capital and operating leases. As of October 31, 2015 and 2014 our diagnostics and genomics segment has approximately $11 million and $8 million, respectively, of lease receivables related to capital leases and approximately $31 million and $33 million, respectively, of net assets for operating leases. We depreciate the assets related to the operating leases over their estimated useful lives.
Capitalized software. We capitalize certain internal and external costs incurred to acquire or create internal use software. Capitalized software is included in property, plant and equipment and is depreciated over three to five years once development is complete.
Impairment of long-lived assets. We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including intangible assets, may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the total of the undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of those assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.
Restructuring and asset impairment charges. The four main components of past restructuring plans are related to workforce reductions, the consolidation of excess facilities, asset impairments and special charges related to inventory. Workforce reduction charges are accrued when it is determined that a liability has been incurred, which is generally after individuals have been notified of their termination dates and expected severance payments. Plans to consolidate excess facilities result in charges for lease termination fees and future commitments to pay lease charges, net of estimated future sublease income. We recognize charges for consolidation of excess facilities generally when we have vacated the premises. These estimates were derived using the authoritative accounting guidance. We have also assessed the recoverability of our long-lived assets, by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted future cash flows. Asset impairments primarily consist of property, plant and equipment and are based on an estimate of the amounts and timing of future cash flows related to the expected future remaining use and ultimate sale or disposal of buildings and equipment net of costs to sell. The charges related to inventory include estimated future inventory disposal payments that we are contractually obliged to make to our suppliers and reserves taken against inventory on hand. If the amounts and timing of cash flows from restructuring activities are significantly different from what we have estimated, the actual amount of restructuring and asset impairment charges could be materially different, either higher or lower, than those we have recorded.
Employee compensation and benefits. Amounts owed to employees, such as accrued salary, bonuses and vacation benefits are accounted for within employee compensation and benefits. The total amount of accrued vacation benefit was $156$86 million and $144$100 million as of October 31, 2012,2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.
Foreign currency translation. We translate and remeasure balance sheet and income statement items into U.S. dollars. For those subsidiaries that operate in a local currency functional environment, all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates at the balance sheet date; revenue and expenses are translated using monthly exchange rates which approximate to average exchange rates in effect during each period. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive lossincome (loss) in stockholders' equity.
For those subsidiaries that operate in a U.S. dollar functional environment, foreign currency assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at current exchange rates except for nonmonetarynon-monetary assets and capital accounts which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are generally remeasured at monthly exchange rates which approximate average exchange rates in effect during each period. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement are included in consolidated
net income. Net gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, including hedging gains and losses, are reported in other income (expense), net and was $199 million loss for fiscal year 20122015, $4 million loss for 2014 and $12 million loss for both fiscal2013, respectively.
2. REVISION OF PRIOR PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
During the year ended October 31, 2014 the company identified and recorded various out of period income tax adjustments. Specifically, $13 million tax expense for corrections to U.S. deferred taxes, $12 million tax expense for the correction of transfer pricing for prior years, 2011$9 million tax benefit related to the correction of the tax basis of land in the U.K. and 2010.$3 million of tax expense to correct tax related balance sheet accounts. During the year ended October 31, 2015 the company identified additional income tax out of period adjustments. Specifically, $13 million of tax benefit from the reduction in deferred tax liabilities due to tax rate changes in Denmark occurring in the prior year, $10 million of tax benefit to correct the overstatement of U.S. income taxes payable, $7 million of tax benefit to correct the understatement of international prepaid income taxes, $17 million of tax expense to correct deferred tax liabilities associated with unremitted foreign earnings, $4 million of tax expense attributable to an error discovered on a prior year U.S. tax return, $4 million tax expense related to foreign deferred tax assets, and a $2 million net tax benefit associated with errors in prior year international income tax provisions. The aggregated impact of the out of period income tax adjustments identified, including the reversing effect of prior year errors, resulted in the provision for income taxes in 2014 and 2013 to be overstated by $45 million and $10 million, respectively.
We evaluated the aggregate effects of the errors to our previously issued financial statements in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins No. 99 and No. 108 and, based upon quantitative and qualitative factors, determined that the errors were not material to the previously issued financial statements and disclosures included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2014 or for any quarterly periods included therein or through our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As part of this evaluation, we considered a number of qualitative factors, including, among others, that the errors did not change a net loss recordedinto net income or vice versa, did not have an impact on our long-term debt covenant compliance, and did not mask a change in earnings or other trends when considering the overall competitive and economic environment within the industry during the periods. However, as a result of the Company presenting continuing operations and discontinued operations for the first time in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, we determined the effect of the errors is significant to our financial results for the year ending October 31, 2014 and 2013. Accordingly, we are revising our historical financial statements.
Due to the immaterial nature of the misstatement corrections, the cumulative adjustments required to correct the misstatements in the financial statements prior to the fiscal year 2012ended October 31, 2013 are reflected in the revised stockholders’ equity as of October 31, 2012. The cumulative effect of those adjustments increased previously reported retained earnings by $13 million and reduced additional paid in capital by $12 million. The cumulative effect to retained earnings includes $14the $65 million related to adjusting the cumulative effect of loss associated witha change in accounting principle to reduce our long-term tax liabilities that was previously recorded in 2014.
These adjustments also cumulatively impacted the settlementfollowing balance sheet line items as of currency contracts entered intoOctober 31, 2014:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | October 31, 2014 |
| | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Revised |
| | (in millions) |
| Other current assets | $ | 261 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 263 |
|
| Current assets of discontinued operations | $ | 1,821 |
| | 7 |
| | $ | 1,828 |
|
| Total current assets | $ | 5,500 |
| | 9 |
| | $ | 5,509 |
|
| Other assets | $ | 283 |
| | (15 | ) | | $ | 268 |
|
| Non-current assets of discontinued operations | $ | 1,165 |
| | (10 | ) | | $ | 1,155 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 10,831 |
| | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | 10,815 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Other accrued liabilities | $ | 289 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 279 |
|
| Total current liabilities | $ | 1,702 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 1,692 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | $ | 522 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 513 |
|
| Total liabilities | $ | 5,530 |
| | $ | (19 | ) | | $ | 5,511 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Retained earnings | $ | 6,466 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 6,469 |
|
| Total stockholders equity | $ | 5,298 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 5,301 |
|
The errors discussed above resulted in an understatement of net income of $45 million and $10 million relating to the provision for income taxes for the purchase of Dako.years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, 2014 |
| | As Reported | | Adjustments | | Revised | | Reclassified for Discontinued Operations |
| | (in millions, except per share data) |
| Income before taxes | $ | 646 |
| | | | $ | 646 |
| | |
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 142 |
| | (45 | ) | | 97 |
| | |
| Income from continuing operations before taxes | | | | | | | 229 |
|
| Provision for income taxes on continuing operations | | | | | | | (3 | ) |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | 232 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense of $100 | | | | | | | 317 |
|
| Net income | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 549 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.51 |
| | $ | 0.14 |
| | $ | 1.65 |
| | |
| Diluted | $ | 1.49 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 1.62 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - basic | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.70 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.95 |
|
| Net income per share - basic | | | | | | | $ | 1.65 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - diluted | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.69 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.93 |
|
| Net income per share - diluted | | | | | | | $ | 1.62 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 79 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 124 |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, 2013 |
| | As Reported | | Adjustments | | Revised | | Reclassified for Discontinued Operations |
| | (in millions, except per share data) |
| Income before taxes | $ | 859 |
| | | | $ | 859 |
| | |
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 135 |
| | (10 | ) | | 125 |
| | |
| Income from continuing operations before taxes | | | | | | | 293 |
|
| Provision for income taxes on continuing operations | | | | | | | 68 |
|
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | 225 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax expense of $57 | | | | | | | 509 |
|
| Net income | $ | 724 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 734 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share: | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 2.12 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 2.15 |
| | |
| Diluted | $ | 2.10 |
| | $ | 0.03 |
| | $ | 2.13 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - basic | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.66 |
|
| Income form discontinued operations | | | | | | | $ | 1.49 |
|
| Net income per share - basic | | | | | | | $ | 2.15 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Net income per share - diluted | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | | | | | | $ | 0.65 |
|
| Income form discontinued operations | | | | | | | $ | 1.48 |
|
| Net income per share - diluted | | | | | | | $ | 2.13 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 926 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 936 |
| | |
The adjustments resulted in the following revisions to our consolidated cash flow statements.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, 2014 |
| | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Revised |
| | (in millions) |
| Net income | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 549 |
|
| Deferred taxes | $ | (132 | ) | | $ | (60 | ) | | $ | (192 | ) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Other assets and liabilities | $ | (60 | ) | | $ | 15 |
| | $ | (45 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, 2013 |
| | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Revised |
| | (in millions) |
| Net income | $ | 724 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
| Deferred taxes | $ | 31 |
| | (35 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| Other assets and liabilities | $ | (17 | ) | | 25 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
All financial information presented in the accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements was revised to reflect the correction of these errors.
2.3. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, theApril 2014, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”("FASB") issued amendments to the guidance on discontinued operations. The guidance changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those
strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. Additionally, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that requireswill provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, expenses of discontinued operations and of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. The new disclosures for fair value measurements and provides clarification for existing disclosure requirements. The guidance is effective for interimAgilent prospectively for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur after November 1, 2016.
The disposal of Keysight meets the definition of a discontinued operation under both the existing and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for gross presentationamended accounting guidance. The historical results of activityoperations and the financial position of Keysight are included in level 3 which is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods in those years. We adopted the guidance for new disclosures for fair value measurements and clarification for existing disclosure requirements as of February 1, 2010 and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we adopted the guidance regarding level 3 activity on November 1, 2011statements of Agilent and there was no material impact to our consolidated financial statements. See Note 12-, “Fair Value Measurements” for additional information on the fair value of financial instruments.
are reported as discontinued operations within this Form 10-K.
In May 2011,2014, the FASB amended fair value measurementissued an amendment to the accounting guidance related to revenue recognition. The amendment was the result of a joint project between the FASB and disclosure guidancethe International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") to achieve convergence withclarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop common revenue standards for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”("IFRS"). The amendedTo meet those objectives, the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and the IASB is issuing IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. We are evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance modifies the measurement of fair value, clarifies verbiage, and changes disclosure or other requirements in US GAAP and IFRS. The guidance is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted the guidance as of February 1, 2012 and there was no material impact onto our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, theJanuary 2015, FASB issued guidance relatedon simplifying income statement presentation by eliminating the concept of extraordinary items from U.S. GAAP. The amendments in this update are effective for us from November 1, 2016, and in interim periods during that year. A reporting entity may apply the amendments prospectively and retrospectively to all periods presented in the presentation of comprehensive income. The guidance aims to improvefinancial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,applied from the beginning after December 15, 2011. We expect to make presentational changes to our consolidated financial statements beginningof the fiscal year 2013 upon adoptionof adoption. We have evaluated the accounting guidance and determined that there is no impact of this guidance. This guidance impacts financial statement presentation requirements only; its adoption will not have a material impact onupdate to our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011,February 2015, FASB issued an amendment to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. The amendments in this update are effective for us from November 1, 2016, and for interim periods within that year. We do not expect that adopting this guidance will have an impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, FASB issued an amendment to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs remain unchanged. The amendments in this update are effective for us from November 1, 2016, and for interim periods within that year. Earlier adoption is permitted and we are currently evaluating when we will implement the guidance. We do not expect the impact of adopting this guidance to be material to our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2015, FASB issued guidance related to simplify the enhanced disclosures that will enable the users of financial statementsaccounting for inventory and to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements of an entity's financial position.more closely align their guidance with international accounting standards. The amendments require improved information about financial instrumentsin this update apply to companies which use inventory valuation methods other than last in, first-out and derivative instrumentsthe retail inventory method to change the way that are either offset or subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreement.they subsequently measure the value of inventory on their balance sheet. Under the new guidance, inventory should be valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value rather than the lower of cost and market. The guidance isamendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after Januaryus from November 1, 2013,2017, and for interim periods within those annual periods.in the following year. We do not expect this amended guidance to have an impact to our consolidated financial statements, as the new guidance aligns with our current practice of using net realizable value as our estimate of market value.
In July 2015, FASB announced that the implementation date of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, would be delayed by one year. It will now be effective for us in fiscal 2019, with early adoption permitted for us from November 1, 2017. We are evaluating the timing of our adoption and the impact of this guidance to our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, FASB issued guidance intended to simplify accounting for adjustments to provisional amounts recorded in connection with business combinations. Beginning in November 1, 2017 and in the interim periods from November 1, 2018, adjustments will be recorded in the period that they are determined rather than applied retrospectively via revision to the period of acquisition and each period thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements, due tobut we are currently evaluating the adoptiontiming of this guidance.our adoption.
In July 2012, theNovember 2015, FASB simplified theissued guidance for testing for impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill. The changes are intended to reduce compliance costs. Agilent's indefinite-lived intangible assets are in- process research and development intangible assets. The revisedsimplify accounting for deferred taxes. Beginning on November 1, 2017 including the interim periods following that date we will present all deferred tax balances as non-current. Existing GAAP guidance allows a qualitative approach for testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, similarrequires us to the recently issued impairment testing guidance for goodwill and allows the option to first assess qualitative factors (events and circumstances) that could have affected the significant inputs used in determining the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to determine whether it is more likely than not (meaning a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. An organization may choose to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to calculating its fair value. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. Agilent early adopted this guidance for the year ended October 31, 2012. There was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements due to the adoption of this guidance.
3. ACQUISITIONS
Acquisition of Dako
On June 21, 2012, we completed the acquisition of Dako through the acquisition of 100% of share capital of Dako, a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Denmark, under the share purchase agreement, dated May 16, 2012. As a result of the acquisition, Dako has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. Accordingly, the results of Dako are included in Agilent's consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition. For the period from June 22, 2012 to October 31, 2012, Dako's net revenue was $126 million and net loss was $37 million. The acquisition of Dako and its portfolio is another step to increase our growth in several rapidly expanding areas of diagnostics, including anatomic pathology and molecular diagnostics,record deferred tax balances as well as strengthen our existing offerings with a focus on product development to help in the fight against cancer.
The consideration paid was approximately $2,143 million, of which $1,400 million was paid directly to the seller and $743 million was paid to satisfy outstanding debt. Agilent funded the acquisition using our existing cash. In connection with the acquisition of Dako, Agilent entered into several foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the currency exchange risk associated with the payment of the purchase price in Danish Krone and the repayment of debt in multiple currencies. The aggregate notional amount of the currencies hedged was $1.7 billion. These foreign exchange contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and were not designated as hedging instruments. The resulting loss on settlement, on the date of acquisition, was $14 million and was recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended October 31, 2012.
The Dako acquisition was accounted foreither current or non-current in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance. The acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recorded by Agilent at their estimated fair values. Agilent determined the estimated fair values with the assistanceclassification of appraisals or valuations performed by third party specialists, discounted cash flow analyses, and estimates made by management. We expect to realize revenue synergies, leverage and expand the existing sales channels and product development resources, and utilize the assembled workforce. The company also anticipates opportunities for growth through expanded geographic and customer segment diversity and the ability to leverage additional products and capabilities. These factors, among others, contributed to a purchase price in excess of the estimated fair value of Dako's net identifiable assets acquired (see summary of net assets below), and, as a result, we have recorded goodwill in connection with this transaction.
Goodwill acquired was allocated to our operating segments and reporting units as a part of the purchase price allocation. All goodwill was allocated to the diagnostics and genomics reporting unit. We do not expect the goodwill recognized to be deductible for income tax purposes. Any impairment charges made in the future associated with goodwill will not be tax deductible.
A portion of the overall purchase price was allocated to acquired intangible assets. Amortization expense associated with acquired intangible assets is not deductible for tax purposes. Therefore, approximately $185 million was established as a deferred tax liability for the future amortization of these intangibles and is included in "other long-term liabilities" in the table below.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the closing date of June 21, 2012 (in millions):
|
| | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | | $ | 11 |
| |
| Accounts receivable | | | 96 |
| |
| Inventories | | | 90 |
| |
| Other current assets | | | 5 |
| |
| Property, plant and equipment | | | 146 |
| |
| Long term investments | | | 11 |
| |
| Intangible assets | | | 738 |
| |
| Other assets | | | 13 |
| |
| Goodwill | | | 1,382 |
| |
| Total assets acquired | | 2,492 | |
|
| Accounts payable | | | (24 | ) | |
| Employee compensation and benefits | | | (24 | ) | |
| Other accrued liabilities | | | (47 | ) | |
| Long-term debt | | | (43 | ) | |
| Other long-term liabilities | | | (211 | ) | |
| Net assets acquired | | | $ | 2,143 |
| |
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities were generally determined using historical carrying values given the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities.
The fair values for acquired inventory, property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets were determined with the
input from third party valuation specialists.
The fair valuesunderlying attributes. Early adoption is permitted. We are still evaluating when we will adopt this guidance as we expect adoption will cause significant balance sheet reclassifications. See Note 6, “Income Taxes” for details of certain other assets, investments, long-term debt,the current and certain other long-term liabilities were determined internally using historical carrying values and estimates made by management.
Valuations of intangible assets acquired
The components of intangible assets acquired in connection with the Dako acquisition were as follows (in millions):
non-current deferred tax liability balances.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | Estimated Useful Life |
| Developed product technology | | $ | 287 |
| | | 8 - 9 yrs |
| Customer relationships | | 140 |
| | | 4 yrs |
| Tradenames and trademarks | | 128 |
| | | 12 yrs |
| Total intangible assets subject to amortization | | 555 |
|
| | |
| In-process research and development | | 183 |
| | | |
| Total intangible assets | | $ | 738 |
| | | |
As noted above, the intangible assets, including in-process research and development, were valued with input from valuation specialists. The In-Process Research and Development was valued using the multi-period excess earnings method under the income approach by discounting forecasted cash flows directly relatedOther amendments to the products expecting to result from the projects, net of returns on contributory assets. The primary in-process project acquired relates to a major new product platform which will be releasedGAAP in the near future. Total costsU.S. that have been issued by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to completehave a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On September 19, 2013, Agilent announced its intention to separate its electronic measurement business, Keysight, which was previously a separate reportable segment, into a stand-alone publicly traded company. Keysight was incorporated in Delaware as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent on December 6, 2013. On November 1, 2014, we completed the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Keysight to Agilent stockholders, who received one share of Keysight common stock for all Dako In- Process Research and Development were estimated at approximately $49 million over timeevery two shares of Agilent common stock held as of the close date.
Acquisitionof business on the record date, October 22, 2014. The separation agreement ensured that Keysight had approximately $700 million of total cash and integration costs directly related to the Dako acquisition totaled $15 million forcash equivalents immediately following distribution. For the year ended October 31, 20122015, we transferred a total amount of cash and were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. Such costs are expensed in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance.cash equivalents of $734 million to Keysight.
The historical results of operations and statement of financial position of Keysight have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements and prior periods have been restated. Discontinued operations include results of Keysight's business except for certain allocated corporate overhead costs and certain costs associated with transition services provided by Agilent to Keysight. Discontinued operations also includes other costs incurred by Agilent to separate Keysight. These costs include transaction charges, advisory and consulting fees and information system expenses.
The following represents pro forma operatingtable summarizes results as if Dako had beenfrom discontinued operations of Keysight included in the company's condensed consolidated statementsstatement of operations as of the beginning of fiscal 2011(in millions, except per share amounts):operations:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| Net revenue | $ | 7,100 |
| | $ | 6,976 |
|
| Net income | $ | 1,145 |
| | $ | 909 |
|
| Net income per share — basic | $ | 3.29 |
| | $ | 2.62 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted | $ | 3.24 |
| | $ | 2.56 |
|
The pro forma financial information assumes that the companies were combined as of November 1, 2010 and include business combination accounting effects from the acquisition including amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, the impact on cost of sales due to the respective estimated fair value adjustments to inventory, changes to interest income for cash used in the acquisition, interest expense and currency losses associated with debt paid in connection with the acquisition and acquisition related transaction costs and tax related effects. The pro forma information as presented above is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2011. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Net revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,933 |
| | $ | 2,888 |
|
| Costs and expenses | 39 |
| | 2,521 |
| | 2,323 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | (39 | ) | | 412 |
| | 565 |
|
| Other income (expense), net | — |
| | 5 |
| | 1 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations before tax | (39 | ) | | 417 |
| | 566 |
|
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (2 | ) | | 100 |
| | 57 |
|
| Net income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 509 |
|
The unaudited pro forma financialNet income (loss) from discontinued operations includes transaction, information systems and other costs to effect the separation of $39 million and $178 million for the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In the year ended October 31, 2012 combines2015 only those costs incurred to effect the historical results of Agilentseparation have been included. No income or expense has been recorded for the year ended October 31, 2012 (which includes DakoKeysight business after the acquisition date) and for Dako for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and the two months ended May 31, 2012.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended October 31, 2011 combines the historical results ofseparation from Agilent for the year ended October 31, 2011 and for Dako the year ended December 31, 2011 (due to differences in reporting periods).on November 1, 2014.
The unaudited pro financial information forfollowing table presents Agilent's electronic measurement business assets and liabilities removed from the years endedconsolidated balance sheet as of November 1, 2014 and presented as discontinued operations as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 includes the fourth quarter of Dako's calendar reporting period, October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, in both years.2014:
|
| | | |
| | October 31, 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
| Assets: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 810 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 357 |
|
| Inventory | 498 |
|
| Other current assets | 163 |
|
| Current assets of discontinued operations | 1,828 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, net | 470 |
|
| Goodwill | 392 |
|
| Other intangible assets, net | 18 |
|
| Long-term investments | 63 |
|
| Other assets | 212 |
|
| Non-current assets of discontinued operations | 1,155 |
|
| Total assets of discontinued operations | $ | 2,983 |
|
| Liabilities: |
|
| Accounts payable | $ | 173 |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | 167 |
|
| Deferred revenue | 175 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 108 |
|
| Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 623 |
|
| Long-term debt | 1,099 |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | 213 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities | 122 |
|
| Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | 1,434 |
|
| Total liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 2,057 |
|
AcquisitionIn addition, $332 million of Varian
On May 14, 2010, we completedaccumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes, primarily related to pension and other post-retirement benefits plans and currency translation was also transferred to Keysight together with $28 million of additional paid in capital related to share based compensation windfall tax benefits. The removal of Keysight net assets and equity related adjustments is presented as a reduction in Agilent's retained earnings and represents a non cash financing activity excluding cash transferred. See Note 6 “Income Taxes” for tax implications and adjustments due to the acquisition of Varian through the merger of Variandistribution and Cobalt Acquisition Corp., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent under the Merger Agreement, dated July 26, 2009. AsNote 5 “Share Based Compensation” for changes to share based compensation awards as a result of the merger, Varian becamedistribution of Keysight.
In order to effect the separation and govern our relationship with Keysight after the separation, we entered into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Agilent. Accordingly,Separation and Distribution Agreement and other agreements including a Tax Matters Agreement, an Employee Matters Agreement and a Transition Services Agreement. The Separation and Distribution Agreement governs the results of Varian are included in Agilent's consolidated financial statements from the dateseparation of the merger. Forelectronic measurement business, the period from May 15, 2010 to October 31, 2010, Varian's net revenue was $320 million.
The consideration paid was approximately $1,507 million, comprising $52 cash per sharetransfer of Varian's outstanding common stock. We also paid $17 million to acquire Varian's vested in-the money stock options at $52 cash per share less their exercise price. In addition we paid $12 million for Varian's non-vested in-the-money stock options at $52 cash per share less their exercise price, and Varian's non-vested restricted stock awards and non-vested performance shares, each at 100 percent of target and at $52 cash per share. In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance, settlement of the non-vested awards is considered to be for the performance of post combination services and is therefore stock-based compensation expensed immediately after acquisition. Agilent funded the acquisition using the proceeds from our September 2009 offering of senior notesassets and other existing cash.matters related to our relationship with Keysight. Any costs incurred by Agilent in respect of these agreements after separation are recorded in the continuing operations of Agilent.
The Varian merger was accounted for in accordanceTax Matters Agreement governs the respective rights, responsibilities and obligations of Keysight and Agilent with the authoritative accounting guidance. The acquired assetsrespect to taxes, tax attributes, tax returns, tax proceedings and assumed liabilities were recorded by Agilent at their estimated fair values. Agilent determined the estimated fair values with the assistance of appraisals or valuations performed by third party specialists, discounted cash flow analyses, quoted market prices where available, and estimates made by management. We expect to realize operational and cost synergies, leverage the existing sales channels and product development resources, and utilize the assembled workforce. The company expects the combined entity to achieve significant savings in corporate and divisional overhead costs. The company also anticipates opportunities for growth through expanded geographic and customer segment diversity and the ability to leverage additional products and capabilities. These factors, among others, contributed to a purchase price in excess of the estimated fair value of Varian's net identifiable assets acquired, and, as a result, we have recorded goodwill in connection with this transaction.certain other tax matters.
Goodwill acquired was allocated to our operating segmentsThe Employee Matters Agreement governs the compensation and reporting units as a part of the purchase price allocation. Goodwill was allocatedemployee benefit obligations with respect to the life sciencescurrent and chemical analysis reporting units. We do not expect the goodwill recognizedformer employees and non-employee directors of Keysight and Agilent, and generally allocates liabilities and responsibilities relating to be deductible for income tax purposes. Any impairment charges made in the future associated with goodwill will not be tax deductible.
A portionemployee compensation, benefit plans and programs. The Employee Matters Agreement provides that employees of the overall purchase price was allocated to acquired intangible assets. Amortization expense associated with acquired intangible assets is not deductible for tax purposes. Therefore, approximately $138 million was established as a deferred tax liability for the future amortization of these intangibles.
The following table summarizesKeysight will no longer participate in benefit plans sponsored or maintained by Agilent. In addition, the allocationEmployee Matters Agreement provides that each of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquiredparties will be responsible for their respective former and liabilities assumed on the closing date of May 14, 2010 (in millions):current employees and compensation plans for such current employees.
|
| | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 226 |
|
| Accounts receivable | 138 |
|
| Inventories | 170 |
|
| Other current assets | 47 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 126 |
|
| Intangible assets | 417 |
|
| Other assets | 13 |
|
| Goodwill | 787 |
|
| Total assets acquired | 1,924 |
|
| Accounts payable | (65 | ) |
| Employee compensation and benefits | (43 | ) |
| Deferred revenue | (30 | ) |
| Other accrued liabilities | (72 | ) |
| Long-term debt | (15 | ) |
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | (18 | ) |
| Other long-term liabilities | (157 | ) |
| Net assets acquired | $ | 1,524 |
|
Under the terms of the Transition Services Agreement, we agreed to provide administrative, site services, information technology systems and various other corporate and support services to Keysight over the period of 12-18 months after the separation on a cost or cost-plus basis. The fair valuemost significant component of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities were generally determined using historical carrying values given the short-term natureservice income is the provision of these assets and liabilities.
The fair valuesIT services that was completed by the end of the second quarter of 2015. In total we have recorded income for acquired inventory, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, retirement and post-retirement benefits, and deferred revenue were determinedall services provided to Keysight of approximately $12 million. In addition, Agilent expects to receive lease income together with site service income from Keysight over the assistancenext 4-5 years of valuations performed by independent valuation specialists.
The fair values of certain other assets, long-term debt, and certain other long-term liabilities were determined internally using discounted cash flow analyses and estimates made by management.
The company has completed its business combination accounting as of May 14, 2010.
Valuations of intangible assets acquired
The components of intangible assets acquired in connection with the Varian acquisition were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | Estimated Useful Life |
| Developed product technology | $ | 221 |
| | 1-7 yrs |
| Customer relationships | 157 |
| | 2-10 yrs |
| Tradenames and trademarks | 10 |
| | 1.5 yrs |
| Order backlog | 9 |
| | 0.5-1 yr |
| Total intangible assets subject to amortization | 397 |
| | |
| In-process research and development | 20 |
| | |
| Total intangible assets | $ | 417 |
| | |
Acquisition and integration costs directly related to the Varian merger totaled $102approximately $13 million for per year. In the year ended October 31, 2010. These costs were substantially recorded2015 other income (expense), net includes $25 million of income in selling, general and administrative expenses. Such costs are expensed in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance.
The following represents pro forma operating results as if Varian had been included in the company's consolidated statements of operations asrespect of the beginningprovision of the fiscal year presented (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | |
| | | 2010 |
| Net revenue | | $ | 5,871 |
|
| Net income | | $ | 648 |
|
| Net income per share — basic | | $ | 1.87 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted | | $ | 1.84 |
|
The unaudited pro forma financial information assumes that the companies were combined as of November 1, 2009services to, and includes business combination accounting effectslease income from the acquisition including amortization charges from acquired intangible assets, reduction in revenue and increase in cost of sales due to the respective estimated fair value adjustments to deferred revenue and inventory, decrease to interest income for cash used in the acquisition, increase in interest expense associated with debt issue to fund the acquisition, acquisition related transaction costs and tax related effects. The unaudited pro forma information as presented above is for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2010.
The unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended October 31, 2010 combines the historical results of Agilent for the year ended October 31, 2010 and the historical results of Varian for the six months ended April 2, 2010 and the period May 1, 2010 to May 14, 2010.Keysight.
4.5. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Agilent accounts for share-based awards in accordance with the provisions of the revised accounting guidance which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to our employees and directors including employee stock option awards, restricted stock units, employee stock purchases made under our ESPP and performance share awards granted to selected members of our senior management under the LTPP based on estimated fair values.
Description of Share-Based Plans
Employee stock purchase plan. Effective November 1, 2000, we adopted the ESPP. The ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute up to ten percent of their base compensation to purchase shares of our common stock at 85 percent of the closing market price at purchase price, but only uses the purchase date to establish the fair market value.date. Shares authorized for issuance in connection with the ESPP are subject to an automatic annual increase of the lesser of one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Agilent on November 1, or an amount determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of the ESPP, in no event shall the number of shares issued under the ESPP exceed 75 million shares.
Under our ESPP, employees purchased 1,405,774346,472 shares for $4712 million in 20122015, 1,205,4311,604,406 shares for $4373 million in 20112014 and 1,577,3881,454,724 shares for $4048 million in 20102013. As of October 31, 20122015, the number of shares of common stock authorized and available for issuance under our ESPP was 35,605,229. This excludes the number of shares of common stock to be issued to participants in consideration of the aggregate participant contributions totaling $24 million as of October 31, 201242,605,407.
Incentive compensation plans. On November 19, 2008 and March 11, 2009, the Compensation Committee of Board of Directors and the stockholders, respectively, approved the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan (the "2009 Stock Plan") to replace the Company's 1999 Stock Plan and 1999 Stock Non-Employee Director Stock Plan and subsequently reserved 25 million shares of Company common stock that may be issued under the 2009 Plan, plus any shares forfeited or cancelled under the 1999 Stock Plan. The 2009 Stock Plan provides for the grant of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"), restricted stock, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), performance shares and performance units with performance-based conditions on vesting or exercisability, and cash awards. The 2009 Plan has a term of ten years.years. As of October 31, 20122015, 16,712,46113,524,407 shares were available for future awards under the 2009 Stock Plan.
Stock options granted under the 2009 Stock Plans may be either "incentive stock options", as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or non-statutory. Options generally vest at a rate of 25 percent per year over a period of four years from the date of grant and generally have a maximum contractual term of ten years. The exercise price for stock options is generally not less than 100 percent of the fair market value of our common stock on the date the stock award is granted.
Effective November 1, 2003, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the LTPP, which is a
performance stock award program administered under the 1999 and 2009 Stock Plans,Plan, for the company's executive officers and other key employees. Participants in this program are entitled to receive unrestricted shares of the company's stock after the end of a three-year period, if specified performance targets are met. LTPP awards are generally designed to meet the criteria of a performance award with the performance metrics and peer group comparison set at the beginning of the performance period. Based on the performance metrics the final award may vary from zero to 200 percent of the target award. The maximum contractual term for awards under the LTPP program is three years. We consider the dilutive impact of this program in our diluted net income per share calculation only to the extent that the performance conditions are met.
In March 2007, we began to issue restricted stock units under our share-based plans. The estimated fair value of the restricted stock unit awards granted under the Stock Plans is determined based on the market price of Agilent's common stock on the date
of grant adjusted for expected dividend yield. Restricted stock units generally vest, with some exceptions, at a rate of 25 percent per year over a period of four years from the date of grant.
In connection with the separation of Keysight Technologies on November 1, 2014 and in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement we made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of our share-based compensation awards with the intention of preserving the intrinsic value of the awards prior to the separation. Exercisable and non-exercisable stock options converted to those of the entity where the employee is working post-separation. Restricted stock units awards and long-term performance plan grants were adjusted to provide holders restricted stock units and long-term performance plan grants in the company that employs such employee following the separation. These adjustments to our stock-based compensation awards did not have a material impact on compensation expense.
Impact of Share-based Compensation Awards
We have recognized compensation expense based on the estimated grant date fair value method under the authoritative guidance. For all share-based awards we have recognized compensation expense using a straight-line amortization method. As the guidance requires that share-based compensation expense be based on awards that are ultimately expected to vest, estimated share-based compensation has been reduced for estimated forfeitures.
The impact on our results for share-based compensation was as follows:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cost of products and services | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 14 |
| $ | 11 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 12 |
|
| Research and development | 10 |
| | 10 |
| | 10 |
| 5 |
| | 7 |
| | 5 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | 50 |
| | 47 |
| | 42 |
| 39 |
| | 39 |
| | 34 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense in continuing operations | | 55 |
| | 59 |
| | 51 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense in discontinued operations | | — |
| | 39 |
| | 37 |
|
| Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 76 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 66 |
| $ | 55 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | 88 |
|
At October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 there was no share-based compensation capitalized within inventory. IncomeThe windfall income tax benefit realized from the exercised stock options and similar awards recognized was $8 million in 20122015, $1 million in 20112014 and $2 million in 20102013, respectively. Approximately $11 million of previously recognized windfall tax benefits was reversed due to the favorable settlement of a tax authority examination in the statementfirst quarter of operations for share-based compensation was not material.2014. The weighted average grant date fair value of options, granted in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013 was $13.6910.58, $12.4818.73 and $9.8112.18 per share, respectively.
Included in the 20102015, 2014 and 2013 expense is incremental expense for acceleration of share-based compensation related to the announced workforce reduction plan of $2$2 million,. In 2012 $1 million and 2011 the expense for the acceleration of share-based compensation related to the announced workforce reduction plan was immaterial.$2 million, respectively. Upon termination of the employees impacted by workforce reduction, the non-vested Agilent awards held by these employees immediately vests. Employees have a period of up to three months in which to exercise the Agilent options before such options are cancelled. In addition, in 2010, we reversed approximately $3 million of expense for the cancellation of non-vested awards related to the separation of a senior executive.
Valuation Assumptions
For all periods presented, the fair value of share based awards for employee stock option awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For all periods presented, shares granted under the LTPP were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. The estimated fair value of restricted stock unit awards was determined based on the market price of Agilent's common stock on the date of grant adjusted for expected dividend yield. On January 17, 2012, the company's Board of Directors approved the initiation of quarterly cash dividends to the company's shareholders. The fair value of all the awards granted prior to the declaration of quarterly cash dividend was measured based on an expected dividend yield of 0%. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of our common stock at 85 percent of the fair market value at the purchase date.
The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of employee stock options and LTPP grants.
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| Stock Option Plans: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average risk-free interest rate | 0.88% | | 1.49% | | 2.19% | 1.75% | | 1.69% | | 0.86% |
| Dividend yield | 0% | | 0% | | 0% | 1% | | 1% | | 1% |
| Weighted average volatility | 38% | | 35% | | 37% | 28% | | 39% | | 39% |
| Expected life | 5.8 years | | 5.8 years | | 4.4 years | 5.5 years | | 5.8 years | | 5.8 years |
| LTPP: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Volatility of Agilent shares | 41% | | 40% | | 39% | 25% | | 36% | | 37% |
| Volatility of selected peer-company shares | 17%-75% | | 20%-76% | | 20%-80% | 12%-57% | | 13%-57% | | 6%-64% |
| Price-wise correlation with selected peers | 62% | | 55% | | 53% | 37% | | 47% | | 49% |
Both the Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation fair value models require the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions, including the option'soption’s expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. Due to the separation of Keysight on November 1, 2014, expected volatility for grants of options in fiscal 2015 was based on a 5.5 year average historical stock price volatility of a group of our peer companies. For all the years presented,volatility of our 2015 LTPP grants, we used the 3 year average historical stock price volatility of a group of our peer companies. We believe our historical volatility prior to the separation of Keysight is no longer relevant to use. For the grants of options and LTPP prior to November 1, 2014, the expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using the historical volatility of Agilent'sAgilent’s stock options over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life.life of the stock options and LTPP.
In 2010, the expecteddeveloping our estimated life of our employeeemployees' stock options was 4.4 years. Inof 5.5 years, we considered the first quarterseparation of 2011, we revisedKeysight and the historical option exercise behavior for our estimateexecutive employees who were granted the majority of the expected lifeoptions in the annual grants made which we believe is representative of our employee stock options from 4.4 to 5.8 years. For the grants awarded under the 2009 stock plan after November 1, 2010, we increased the period available to retirement eligible employees to exercise their options from three years at retirement date to the full contractual term of ten years.future behavior. In developing our estimated life of our employee stock options of 5.8 years for 2013 to 2014, we considered the historical option exercise behavior of our executive employees who were granted the majority of the options in the annual grants made which we believe is representative of future behavior. There was no change to the expected life of our employee stock options in 2012.
Share-based Payment Award Activity
Employee Stock Options
The following table summarizes employee stock option award activity made to our employees and directors for 20122015:. The amount of options outstanding and the weighted average exercise price at October 31, 2014, have been revised to reflect the impact of the Keysight separation.
| | | | Options Outstanding | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Options Outstanding | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| Outstanding at October 31, 2011 | 13,071 |
| | $ | 28 |
| |
| Outstanding at October 31, 2014 | | 6,584 |
| | $ | 27 |
|
| Granted | 1,381 |
| | $ | 37 |
| 1,347 |
| | $ | 41 |
|
| Exercised | (2,214 | ) | | $ | 23 |
| (1,925 | ) | | $ | 24 |
|
| Cancelled/Forfeited/Expired | (161 | ) | | $ | 29 |
| (294 | ) | | $ | 35 |
|
| Outstanding at October 31, 2012 | 12,077 |
| | $ | 30 |
| |
| Outstanding at October 31, 2015 | | 5,712 |
| | $ | 31 |
|
Forfeited and expired options from total cancellations in 20122015 were as follows:
| | | | Options Cancelled | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Options Cancelled | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| Forfeited | 88 |
| | $ | 32 |
| 277 |
| | $ | 36 |
|
| Expired | 73 |
| | $ | 25 |
| 17 |
| | $ | 20 |
|
| Total Options Cancelled during 2012 | 161 |
| | $ | 29 |
| |
| Total Options Cancelled during 2015 | | 294 |
| | $ | 35 |
|
The options outstanding and exercisable for equity share-based payment awards at October 31, 20122015 were as follows:
| | | | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Prices | Number Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Number Exercisable | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | Number Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Number Exercisable | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
| | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) | | (in thousands) | | (in years) | | | | (in thousands) |
| $0 - 25 | 2,878 |
| | 3.3 | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 46,693 |
| | 2,487 |
| | 2.9 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 40,046 |
| 1,120 |
| | 1.9 | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 18,873 |
| | 1,120 |
| | 1.9 | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 18,873 |
|
| $25.01 - 30 | 1,411 |
| | 6.6 | | $ | 29 |
| | 9,358 |
| | 669 |
| | 6.2 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | 4,516 |
| 2,425 |
| | 6.1 | | $ | 26 |
| | 27,504 |
| | 1,539 |
| | 5.7 | | $ | 26 |
| | 17,545 |
|
| $30.01 - 40 | 7,782 |
| | 4.8 | | $ | 34 |
| | 18,245 |
| | 5,449 |
| | 3.2 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | 17,470 |
| 921 |
| | 8.1 | | $ | 39 |
| | — |
| | 224 |
| | 8.1 | | $ | 39 |
| | — |
|
| $40.01 & over | 6 |
| | 9.4 | | $ | 45 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| |
| $40.01 - over | | 1,246 |
| | 9.1 | | $ | 41 |
| | — |
| | 13 |
| | 8.6 | | $ | 41 |
| | — |
|
| | 12,077 |
| | 4.7 | | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 74,296 |
| | 8,605 |
| | 3.3 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 62,032 |
| 5,712 |
| | 6.2 | | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 46,377 |
| | 2,896 |
| | 4.4 | | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 36,418 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the company's closing stock price of $35.9937.76 at October 31, 20122015, which would have been received by award holders had all award holders exercised their awards that were in-the-money as of that date. The total number of in-the-money awards exercisable at October 31, 20122015 was approximately 82.7 million.
The following table summarizes the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised and the fair value of options granted in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Value Using Black-Scholes Model |
| | (in thousands) | | | | |
| Options exercised in fiscal 2010 | $ | 72,325 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes value of options granted during fiscal 2010 | |
| | |
| | $ | 10 |
|
| Options exercised in fiscal 2011 | $ | 164,738 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes value of options granted during fiscal 2011 | |
| | |
| | $ | 12 |
|
| Options exercised in fiscal 2012 | $ | 38,188 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes value of options granted during fiscal 2012 | |
| | |
| | $ | 14 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Per Share Value Using Black-Scholes Model |
| | (in thousands) | | | | |
| Options exercised in fiscal 2013 | $ | 71,499 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes per share value of options granted during fiscal 2013 | |
| | |
| | $ | 12 |
|
| Options exercised in fiscal 2014 | $ | 98,075 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes per share value of options granted during fiscal 2014 | |
| | |
| | $ | 19 |
|
| Options exercised in fiscal 2015 | $ | 33,258 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | |
|
| Black-Scholes per share value of options granted during fiscal 2015 | |
| | |
| | $ | 11 |
|
As of October 31, 20122015, the unrecognized share-based compensation costs for outstanding stock option awards, net of expected forfeitures, was approximately $135 million which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of 2.32.0 years. The amount of cash received from the exercise of share-based awards granted was $10058 million in 20122015, $304188 million in 20112014 and $299161 million in 20102013. See Note 5,6, "Income Taxes" for the tax impact on share-based award exercises.
Non-vested Awards
The following table summarizes non-vested award activity in 20122015 primarily for our LTPP and restricted stock unit awards:awards. The amount of non-vested awards and the weighted average grant price at October 31, 2014, have been revised to reflect the impact of the Keysight separation.
| | | | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Price | Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Price |
| | (in thousands) | | | (in thousands) | | |
| Non-vested at October 31, 2011 | 3,604 |
| | $ | 31 |
| |
| Non-vested at October 31, 2014 | | 2,750 |
| | $ | 32 |
|
| Granted | 1,496 |
| | $ | 38 |
| 955 |
| | $ | 42 |
|
| Vested | (1,568 | ) | | $ | 34 |
| (1,016 | ) | | $ | 30 |
|
| Forfeited | (106 | ) | | $ | 35 |
| (159 | ) | | $ | 36 |
|
| FY2009 LTPP Incremental Issuance | 88 |
| | $ | 39 |
| |
| Non-vested at October 31, 2012 | 3,514 |
| | $ | 35 |
| |
| Change in LTPP shares vested in the year due to performance conditions | | (113 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Non-vested at October 31, 2015 | | 2,417 |
| | $ | 36 |
|
As of October 31, 20122015, the unrecognized share-based compensation costs for non-vested restricted stock awards, net of expected forfeitures, was approximately $5832 million which is expected to be amortized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years. The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested was $31 million for 2015, $54 million for 20122014, and $4344 million for 2011 and $35 million for 20102013.
5.6. INCOME TAXES
The domestic and foreign components of income from continuing operations before taxes are:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| U.S. operations | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 163 |
| $ | 77 |
| | $ | (72 | ) | | $ | 5 |
|
| Non-U.S. operations | 998 |
| | 944 |
| | 529 |
| 403 |
| | 301 |
| | 288 |
|
| Total income before taxes | $ | 1,043 |
| | $ | 1,032 |
| | $ | 692 |
| |
| Total income from continuing operations before taxes | | $ | 480 |
| | $ | 229 |
| | $ | 293 |
|
The provision (benefit) for income taxes is comprised of:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| U.S. federal taxes: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (91 | ) | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Deferred | (144 | ) | | — |
| | 37 |
| 97 |
| | (80 | ) | | 3 |
|
| Non-U.S. taxes: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | 41 |
| | (6 | ) | | 145 |
| 62 |
| | 176 |
| | 88 |
|
| Deferred | (22 | ) | | 28 |
| | (141 | ) | (27 | ) | | (111 | ) | | (43 | ) |
| State taxes, net of federal benefit: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current | 1 |
| | (11 | ) | | 12 |
| 1 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Deferred | 8 |
| | 10 |
| | (5 | ) | — |
| | (5 | ) | | 5 |
|
| Total provision | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 8 |
| |
| Total provision (benefit) | | $ | 42 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 68 |
|
The income tax provision (benefit) does not reflect potential future tax savings resulting from excess deductions associated with our various share-based award plans.
The significant components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities included on the consolidated balance sheet are:
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | Deferred Tax Assets | | Deferred Tax Liabilities | | Deferred Tax Assets | | Deferred Tax Liabilities | Deferred Tax Assets | | Deferred Tax Liabilities | | Deferred Tax Assets | | Deferred Tax Liabilities |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Inventory | $ | 24 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 13 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Intangibles | — |
| | 239 |
| | — |
| | 82 |
| — |
| | 95 |
| | — |
| | 142 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 32 |
| 17 |
| | — |
| | 18 |
| | — |
|
| Warranty reserves | 21 |
| | — |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| 11 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
|
| Retiree medical benefits | 5 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| |
| Pension benefits | 136 |
| | — |
| | 110 |
| | — |
| |
| Pension benefits and retiree medical benefits | | 93 |
| | — |
| | 85 |
| | — |
|
| Employee benefits, other than retirement | 60 |
| | — |
| | 84 |
| | — |
| 26 |
| | — |
| | 27 |
| | — |
|
| Net operating loss, capital loss, and credit carryforwards | 293 |
| | — |
| | 272 |
| | — |
| 173 |
| | — |
| | 176 |
| | — |
|
| Unrealized gains/losses on investments | 26 |
| | — |
| | 47 |
| | — |
| |
| Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries | — |
| | 88 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 57 |
| | — |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| 39 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
| | — |
|
| Deferred revenue | 27 |
| | — |
| | 18 |
| | — |
| 41 |
| | — |
| | 41 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 51 |
| | 1 |
| | 56 |
| | 36 |
| 4 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | 3 |
|
| Subtotal | 711 |
| | 328 |
| | 695 |
| | 150 |
| 417 |
| | 128 |
| | 424 |
| | 189 |
|
| Tax valuation allowance | (93 | ) | | — |
| | (369 | ) | | — |
| (131 | ) | | — |
| | (134 | ) | | — |
|
| Total deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities | $ | 618 |
| | $ | 328 |
| | $ | 326 |
| | $ | 150 |
| $ | 286 |
| | $ | 128 |
| | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 189 |
|
The significant increase in 20122015 as compared to 20112014 for the deferred tax asset relating to pension benefits is due mainly to the tax effect of changes in pension plans recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The decrease in the deferred tax liability
relating to intangible assets is due primarily to amortization of acquired intangible assets from Dako. The amortization expenses associated with acquired intangible assets isare not deductible for tax purposes. Accordingly, approximately $185 million was established as a deferred tax liability for the future amortization of these intangibles as a part of the accounting for business combinations of Dako.
Agilent records U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries' earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. As of October 31, 20122015 the Company recognized ana $8833 million deferred tax liability for the overall residual tax expected to be imposed upon the repatriation of unremitted foreign earnings that are not considered permanently reinvested. The increase in 2012 as compared to 2011 primarily relates to a non-recurring distribution of previously considered permanently reinvested earnings. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company assessed the forecasted cash needs and the overall financial position of its foreign subsidiaries and determined that a portion of previously permanently reinvested earnings would no longer be reinvested overseas. As of October 31, 20122015, the cumulative amount of undistributed earnings considered indefinitely reinvested iswas $5.25 billion. No deferred tax liability has been recognized on the basis difference created by such earnings since it is our intention to utilize those earnings in the company’s foreign operations. Because of the availability of U.S. foreign tax credits, the determination of the unrecognized deferred tax liability on these earnings is not practicable.
The breakdown between current and long-term deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities was as follows for the years 20122015 and 20112014:
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Current deferred tax assets (included within other current assets) | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 54 |
| $ | 84 |
| | $ | 88 |
|
| Long-term deferred tax assets (included within other assets) | 400 |
| | 168 |
| 180 |
| | 145 |
|
| Current deferred tax liabilities (included within other accrued liabilities) | (2 | ) | | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | | (7 | ) |
| Long-term deferred tax liabilities (included within other long-term liabilities) | (203 | ) | | (42 | ) | (96 | ) | | (125 | ) |
| Total | $ | 290 |
| | $ | 176 |
| $ | 158 |
| | $ | 101 |
|
Valuation allowances require an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. In the fourth quarter of 2012, management concluded that the valuation allowance for most of Agilent's U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets is no longer needed primarily due to the emergence from cumulative losses in recent years, the return to sustainable
U.S. operating profits and the expectation of sustainable profitability in future periods. As of October 31, 2012, the cumulative positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence regarding the likelihood that most of the deferred tax asset for Agilent's U.S. consolidated income tax group will be realized. Accordingly, we recognized a non-recurring tax benefit of $280 million relating to the valuation allowance reversal. As of October 31, 2012,2015, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance of $93$131 million for certain U.S. state and foreign deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal. The valuation allowance is mainly related to deferred tax assets for California R&D credits, net operating losses in the Netherlands and capital losses in Australia.
At October 31, 20122015, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $237 million and zerotax credit carryforwards of approximately $129 million.carryforwards. The federal net operating losses expire in years beginning 20212022 through 2026, and the federal tax credits begin to expire in 2018, if not utilized.2026. At October 31, 20122015, we had state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $214228 million which expire in years beginning 20132016 through 2031,, if not utilized. In addition, we had net state tax credit carryforwards of $2836 million that do not expire. All of the federal and some of the state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to change of ownership limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. These annual loss limitations may result in the expiration or reduced utilization of the net operating losses. At October 31, 20122015, we also had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $478358 million. Of this foreign loss, $276234 million will expire in years beginning 20132016 through 2022,2024, if not utilized. The remaining $202124 million has an indefinite life. Some of the foreign losses are subject to annual loss limitation rules. These annual loss limitations in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions may result in the expiration or reduced utilization of the net operating losses.
The authoritative guidance prohibits recognition of a deferred tax asset for excess tax benefits related to stock and stock option plans that have not yet been realized through reduction in income taxes payable. Such unrecognized deferred tax benefitsbenefit totals $140193 million as of October 31, 20122015 and will be accounted for as a credit to shareholders' equity, if and when realized, through a reduction in income taxes payable. During the fourth quarter of 2012, due to the reversal of the U.S. valuation allowance, theThe Company recognized approximately $6628 million as a credit to shareholders' equity for cumulative excess tax benefits related to stock and stock option plans that have been realized as of October 31, 2012.2015.
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and our effective tax rate are:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Profit before tax times statutory rate | $ | 365 |
| | $ | 361 |
| | $ | 242 |
| $ | 167 |
| | $ | 80 |
| | $ | 103 |
|
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 8 |
| | (1 | ) | | 4 |
| (8 | ) | | (7 | ) | | 5 |
|
| Non-U.S. income taxed at different rates | (144 | ) | | (153 | ) | | (98 | ) | (72 | ) | | (39 | ) | | (34 | ) |
| Change in unrecognized non-U.S. tax benefits | (68 | ) | | (97 | ) | | 32 |
| |
| Hewlett Packard tax sharing agreement adjustment | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (17 | ) | |
| Change in unrecognized U.S. tax benefits | | (116 | ) | | (111 | ) | | — |
|
| Repatriation of foreign earnings | | 68 |
| | 75 |
| | — |
|
| Valuation allowances | (280 | ) | | (84 | ) | | (162 | ) | (2 | ) | | 2 |
| | (8 | ) |
| Transfer pricing adjustments for prior years | | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Adjustment to income taxes payable | | — |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
|
| Other, net | 9 |
| | (3 | ) | | 7 |
| 5 |
| | 3 |
| | (6 | ) |
| Provision for income taxes | $ | (110 | ) | | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 8 |
| |
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes | | $ | 42 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 68 |
|
| Effective tax rate | (11 | )% | | 2 | % | | 1 | % | 8.7 | % | | (1.3 | )% | | 23.4 | % |
Agilent enjoys tax holidays in several different jurisdictions, most significantly in Singapore and Malaysia.Singapore. The tax holidays provide lower rates of taxation on certain classes of income and require various thresholds of investments and employment or specific types of income in those jurisdictions. The tax holidays are due for renewal between 20152016 and 2023. As a result of the incentives, the impact of the tax holidays decreased income taxes by $12265 million, $12727 million, and $6244 million in 20122015, 20112014, and 20102013, respectively. The benefit of the tax holidays on net income per share (diluted) was approximately $0.350.19, $0.360.08, and $0.180.13 in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively.
For 2012,2015, the company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations was 8.7 percent. The income tax expense from continuing operations was $42 million. The income tax provision from continuing operations for the year ended October 31, 2015 included net discrete tax benefits of$55 million. The net discrete tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2015 included $32 million of net tax benefit primarily due to the settlement of an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS) audit in the U.S. and the recognition of tax expense related to the repatriation of dividends to the U.S. The remaining $23 million net tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2015 included $16 million of tax benefit related to the de-registration of certain foreign branches and statutue of limitations lapses, $6 million of tax benefit for the extension of the U.S. research and development tax credit attributable to the company's prior fiscal year and $1 million of other discrete benefits.
For 2014, the company's effective tax rate from continuing operations was (1.3) percent. The income tax benefit from continuing operations was $3 million. The income tax benefit for the year ended October 31, 2014 included a net discrete benefit of $33 million Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") audit in the U.S. and the recognition of tax expense related to the repatriation of dividends.
For 2013, the effective tax rate reflects a favorable benefit of 11from continuing operations was 23.4 percent. The 1123.4 percent effective tax rate benefit reflects tax on earnings in jurisdictions that have low effective tax rates and includes a $280 million tax benefit due tois lower than the reversal of a valuation allowance for most U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. Valuation allowances require an assessment of both positive and negative evidence when determining whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets are recoverable. Such assessment is required on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. In the fourth quarter of 2012, management concluded that the valuation allowance for most of Agilent's U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets is no longer neededstatutory rate primarily due to the emergence from cumulative losses in recent years, the return to sustainable U.S. operating profits and the expectationmix of sustainable profitability in future periods. As of October 31, 2012, the cumulative positive evidence outweighed the negative evidence regarding the likelihood that most of the deferred tax asset for Agilent's U.S. consolidated income tax group will be realized. Accordingly, the Company recognized a non-recurring tax benefit of $280 million relating to the valuation allowance reversal. The effective tax rate also includes a non-recurring tax expense of $88 million relating to an increase in the overall residual U.S. tax expected to be imposed
upon the repatriation of unremitted foreign earnings previously considered permanently reinvested. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company assessed the forecasted cash needs and the overall financial position of its foreign subsidiaries and determined that a portion of previously permanently reinvested earnings would no longer be reinvested overseas. The effective tax rate is also reduced by a $68 million tax benefit primarily associated with the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of the related interest accruals due to the reassessment of certain uncertain tax positions relating to foreign jurisdictions.
For 2011, the effective tax rate was 2 percent. The 2 percent effective tax rate reflected tax on earnings in non-U.S. jurisdictions that had low effectivetaxed at lower statutory rates; in particular Singapore where we enjoy tax rates and included a $97 million net tax benefit primarily associated with a refund in Canada and the recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits and the reversal of the related interest accruals due to the reassessment of certain uncertain tax positions. The income tax provision also included a $26 million out of period adjustment to reduce the carrying value of certain U.K. deferred tax assets for which the majority was recorded in the quarter ended April 30, 2011. The overstatement of these deferred tax assets resulted in an overstatement of the U.K. valuation allowance release in the fourth quarter of 2010. For the full year, this out of period adjustment was substantially offset by other out of period adjustments. The net impact of all out of period adjustments on the effective tax rate was immaterial. Without considering interest and penalties, the effective rate reflected taxes in all jurisdictions except the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions in which income tax expense or benefit continued to be offset by adjustments to valuation allowances.
For 2010, the effective tax rate was 1 percent. The 1 percent effective tax rate includes a $101 million beneficial release of the U.K. valuation allowance, a $32 million current year increase in prior year tax reserves, and tax on earnings in jurisdictions that had low effective tax rates. Also included is a $17 million tax benefit related to a $54 million non-taxable settlement payment received in connection with a tax sharing agreement between Agilent and Hewlett Packard Company. Without considering interest and penalties, the effective rate reflected taxes in all jurisdictions except the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions in which income tax expense or benefit continued to be offset by adjustments to valuation allowances.holidays.
The breakdown between current and long-term income tax assets and liabilities, excluding deferred tax assets and liabilities, was as follows for the years 20122015 and 2011:2014:
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Current income tax assets (included within other current assets) | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 42 |
| $ | 104 |
| | $ | 82 |
|
| Long-term income tax assets (included within other assets) | 49 |
| | 30 |
| 20 |
| | 45 |
|
| Current income tax liabilities(included within other accrued liabilities) | (115 | ) | | (62 | ) | |
| Current income tax liabilities (included within other accrued liabilities) | | (62 | ) | | (100 | ) |
| Long-term income tax liabilities (included within other long-term liabilities) | (320 | ) | | (356 | ) | (227 | ) | | (285 | ) |
| Total | $ | (321 | ) | | $ | (346 | ) | $ | (165 | ) | | $ | (258 | ) |
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax law and regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. Although the guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes the use of a
recognition and measurement model, the determination of whether an uncertain tax position has met those thresholds will continue to require significant judgment by management. In accordance with the guidance on the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, for all U.S. and other tax jurisdictions, we recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. The ultimate resolution of tax uncertainties may differ from what is currently estimated, which could result in a material impact on income tax expense. If our estimate of income tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would be required. If events occur and the payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary.
The aggregate changes in the balances of our unrecognized tax benefits including all federal, state and foreign tax jurisdictions isare as follows:
| | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 469 |
| | $ | 656 |
| | $ | 930 |
| $ | 417 |
| | $ | 512 |
| | $ | 457 |
|
| Additions for acquisitions | — |
| | — |
| | 15 |
| |
| Additions for tax positions related to the current year | 56 |
| | 41 |
| | 46 |
| 33 |
| | 45 |
| | 52 |
|
| Additions for tax positions from prior years | 40 |
| | 18 |
| | 75 |
| 3 |
| | 11 |
| | 15 |
|
| Reductions for tax positions from prior years | (90 | ) | | (170 | ) | | (284 | ) | (156 | ) | | (141 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Settlements with taxing authorities | (2 | ) | | (67 | ) | | (119 | ) | (4 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) |
| Statute of limitations expirations | (9 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (7 | ) | (4 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (3 | ) |
| Balance, end of year | $ | 464 |
| | $ | 469 |
| | $ | 656 |
| $ | 289 |
| | $ | 417 |
| | $ | 512 |
|
As of October 31, 20122015, we had $464289 million of unrecognized tax benefits of which $450269 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate.
We recognized a tax benefit of $4$2 million,, a tax benefit of $1410 million and a tax expense of $5benefit $5 million of interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013, respectively. Interest and penalties accrued as of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 were $3424 million and $3829 million, respectively.
On November 1, 2014, Agilent transferred deferred tax assets of $237 million, deferred tax liabilities of $37 million, current income tax payable of $40 million, and other long-term liabilities related to uncertain tax positions totaling $8 million to Keysight as part of its separation from Agilent. A current prepaid income tax asset of $19 million and long-term prepaid income tax asset of $3 million related to sales of intercompany assets was also transferred to Keysight upon separation from Agilent.
In the U.S., tax years remain open back to the year 20062012 for federal income tax purposes and the year 2000 for significant states. In 2011, Agilent and the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)On September 22, 2015, we reached an agreement with the IRS for the tax years 2008 through 2011. We expect to make a payment of approximately $9 million as part of closing the exam. As a result, in 2015 we reclassified a portion of other long-term liabilities to other accrued liabilities related to uncertain tax positions of continuing operations that we expect to pay within the next twelve months. This amount is partially offset by a prepaid tax account of approximately $3 million that the IRS is allowing as an offset to the $12 million in incremental taxes. The settlement resulted in the recognition, within the continuing operations, of previously unrecognized tax benefits of $119 million, offset by a tax liability on transfer pricing issues coveringforeign distributions of approximately $99 million principally related to the repatriation of foreign earnings.
On January 29, 2014 we reached an agreement with the IRS for the tax years 2003 - 2007. Tax adjustments resulting from these agreements were offset with net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Agilent's U.S. federal income tax returns for 2006 through 2007 are currently under audit2007. The settlement resulted in the recognition, within the continuing operations, of previously unrecognized tax benefits of $111 million, offset by the IRS. During the three months ended July 31, 2012, we received a Revenue Agents Report (“RAR”) for these years and filed a protest to dispute certain adjustments, the most significanttax liability on foreign distributions of which pertainsapproximately $75 million principally related to the amountrepatriation of a gain from the disposition of a business that was allocated to the U.S. for income tax purposes. There can be no assurance that the outcome of this dispute will not have a material adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition. foreign earnings.
In other major jurisdictions where we conductthe company conducts business, the tax years generally remain open back to the year 2003. With these jurisdictions and the U.S., it is reasonably possible that there could be significant changes to our unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months due to either the expiration of a statute of limitation or a tax audit settlement.settlement which will be partially offset by an anticipated tax liability related to unremitted foreign earnings, where applicable. Given the number of years and numerous matters that remain subject to examination in various tax jurisdictions, we aremanagement is unable to estimate the range of possible changes to the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits.
On July 27, 2015, the U.S. Tax Court issued an opinion in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner related to the treatment of stock-based compensation expense in an intercompany cost-sharing arrangement. A final decision was entered by the U.S. Tax Court on December 1, 2015. At this time, the U.S. Department of the Treasury has not withdrawn the requirement from its regulations
to include stock-based compensation. The I.R.S. has the right to appeal the U.S. Tax Court decision. We concluded that no adjustment to our consolidated financial statements is appropriate at this time due to the uncertainties with respect to the ultimate resolution of this case.
6.7. NET INCOME PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computations for the periods presented below.
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Numerator: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 438 |
| | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 225 |
|
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations | | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 317 |
| | $ | 509 |
|
| Net income | $ | 1,153 |
| | $ | 1,012 |
| | $ | 684 |
| 401 |
| | 549 |
| | 734 |
|
| Denominators: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic weighted average shares | 348 |
| | 347 |
| | 347 |
| 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 341 |
|
| Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents — stock options and other employee stock plans | 5 |
| | 8 |
| | 6 |
| |
| Potential common shares — stock options and other employee stock plans | | 2 |
| | 5 |
| | 4 |
|
| Diluted weighted average shares | 353 |
| | 355 |
| | 353 |
| 335 |
| | 338 |
| | 345 |
|
In connection with the separation of Keysight on November 1, 2014 and in accordance with the Employee Matters Agreement we made certain adjustments to the exercise price and number of our share-based compensation awards. These adjustments to our share-based awards did not have a material impact on our dilutive weighted average shares.
The dilutive effect of share-based awards is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method, which includes consideration of unamortized share-based compensation expense, the tax benefits or shortfalls charged to additional paid-in capital and the dilutive effect of in-the-money options and non-vested restricted stock units. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options and unamortized share-based compensation expense lessand tax benefits or shortfalls iscollectively are assumed proceeds to be used to repurchase hypothetical shares. An increase in the fair market value of the company's common stock can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive awards. The total number of share-based awards issued in 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013 were 53 million, 126 million and 136 million, respectively.
The following table presentsWe exclude stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price of our common stock from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For 2015, 2014 and 2013, options to purchase 1.2 million, 1,500 and 4,200 shares respectively were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. In addition, we also exclude from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, stock options, ESPP, LTPP and restricted stock awards whose combined exercise price, unamortized fair value and excess tax benefits or shortfalls collectively were greater than the average market price of our common stock whichbecause their effect would also be anti-dilutive. For the year ended 2015, 2014 and 2013, options to purchase 368,900, 383,200 and 18,300 shares respectively were not included inexcluded from the computationcalculation of diluted net incomeearnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| Options to purchase shares of common stock (in millions) | — |
| | 1 |
| | 11 |
|
7.8. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Net cash paid for income taxes was $86129 million in 20122015, $22131 million in 20112014, and $48110 million in 20102013. Cash paid for interest was $11171 million in 20122015, $95142 million in 20112014 and $89112 million in 20102013.
9. INVENTORY
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Finished goods | $ | 509 |
| | $ | 452 |
| $ | 362 |
| | $ | 366 |
|
| Purchased parts and fabricated assemblies | 505 |
| | 446 |
| 179 |
| | 208 |
|
| Inventory | $ | 1,014 |
| | $ | 898 |
| $ | 541 |
| | $ | 574 |
|
Inventory-related excess and obsolescence charges, included in continuing operations, of $30$30 million each were recorded in total cost of products in 20122015, $46 million in 20112014 and $27 million in 20102013, respectively. We record excess and obsolete inventory charges for both inventory on our site as well as inventory at our contract manufacturers and suppliers where we have non-cancellable purchase commitments.
9.10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Land | $ | 142 |
| | $ | 138 |
| $ | 53 |
| | $ | 58 |
|
| Buildings and leasehold improvements | 1,475 |
| | 1,271 |
| 705 |
| | 714 |
|
| Machinery and equipment | 882 |
| | 833 |
| 401 |
| | 443 |
|
| Software | 383 |
| | 370 |
| 168 |
| | 154 |
|
| Total property, plant and equipment | 2,882 |
| | 2,612 |
| 1,327 |
| | 1,369 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,718 | ) | | (1,606 | ) | (723 | ) | | (738 | ) |
| Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 1,164 |
| | $ | 1,006 |
| $ | 604 |
| | $ | 631 |
|
Asset impairments other than restructuringrelated to our exit of the NMR business were zero in 20122015 and, $7 millionzero in 20112014 and $3 million in 20102013. Asset impairments in connection with the exit of the NMR business were $7 million in 2014. Depreciation expenses were $17198 million in 20122015, $142120 million in 20112014 and $124116 million in 20102013. For the year ended October 31, 2012 we recorded $15 million of accelerated depreciation related to a building classified as held and used. In accordance with the accounting guidance, it was determined that the building had been abandoned and an assessment was made of the remaining useful life of the building. The building was written down to its appropriate fair value.
10.11. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The goodwill balances at October 31, 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013 and the movements in 20122015 and 20112014 for each of our reportable segments are shown in the table below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Life Sciences | | Chemical Analysis | | Diagnostics and Genomics | | Electronic Measurement | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2010 | $ | 270 |
| | $ | 747 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 398 |
| | $ | 1,456 |
|
| Foreign currency translation impact and other adjustments | 3 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 37 |
| | 47 |
|
| Goodwill arising from acquisitions | 46 |
| | 11 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 64 |
|
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2011 | $ | 319 |
| | $ | 765 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 435 |
| | $ | 1,567 |
|
| Foreign currency translation impact | (4 | ) | | (10 | ) | | 29 |
| | (9 | ) | | 6 |
|
| Goodwill arising from acquisitions | 32 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,387 |
| | 32 |
| | 1,452 |
|
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2012 | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 756 |
| | $ | 1,464 |
| | $ | 458 |
| | $ | 3,025 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Life Sciences and Applied Markets | | Diagnostics and Genomics | | Agilent CrossLab | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2013 | $ | 626 |
| | $ | 1,546 |
| | $ | 456 |
| | $ | 2,628 |
|
| Foreign currency translation impact | 42 |
| | (201 | ) | | 38 |
| | (121 | ) |
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2014 | $ | 668 |
| | $ | 1,345 |
| | $ | 494 |
| | $ | 2,507 |
|
| Foreign currency translation impact | (18 | ) | | (166 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (196 | ) |
| Goodwill arising from acquisitions | — |
| | 55 |
| | — |
| | 55 |
|
| Goodwill as of October 31, 2015 | $ | 650 |
| | $ | 1,234 |
| | $ | 482 |
| | $ | 2,366 |
|
In the third quarter of 2012, we formed a fourth segment, diagnostics and genomics segment, from a portion of our life sciences segment plus the Dako acquisition discussed in Note 3, "Acquisitions". As a result, Agilent has four segments: life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics and electronic measurement, which are the same as our reporting units for the years presented above. We assigned a portion of goodwill from our life sciences segment to our diagnostics and genomics segment. As of September 30, 2012,2015, we assessed goodwill impairment for our fourreporting units: life sciences, chemical analysis, diagnostics and genomics, and electronic measurementunits and no impairment of goodwill was indicated.
The component parts of other intangible assets at October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 are shown in the table below:
| | | | Other Intangible Assets | Other Intangible Assets |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization and Impairments | | Net Book Value | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization and Impairments | | Net Book Value |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| As of October 31, 2011: | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2014: | | | | | | |
| Purchased technology | $ | 510 |
| | $ | 246 |
| | $ | 264 |
| $ | 880 |
| | $ | 475 |
| | $ | 405 |
|
| Backlog | 12 |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| |
| Trademark/Tradename | 40 |
| | 20 |
| | 20 |
| 167 |
| | 52 |
| | 115 |
|
| Customer relationships | 249 |
| | 114 |
| | 135 |
| 368 |
| | 257 |
| | 111 |
|
| Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 811 |
| | $ | 392 |
| | $ | 419 |
| $ | 1,415 |
| | $ | 784 |
| | $ | 631 |
|
| In-Process R&D | 10 |
| | — |
| | 10 |
| 18 |
| | — |
| | 18 |
|
| Total | $ | 821 |
| | $ | 392 |
| | $ | 429 |
| $ | 1,433 |
| | $ | 784 |
| | $ | 649 |
|
| As of October 31, 2012: | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2015: | | | | | | |
| Purchased technology | $ | 849 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 516 |
| $ | 746 |
| | $ | 476 |
| | $ | 270 |
|
| Backlog | 14 |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| |
| Trademark/Tradename | 168 |
| | 27 |
| | 141 |
| 141 |
| | 50 |
| | 91 |
|
| Customer relationships | 391 |
| | 155 |
| | 236 |
| 230 |
| | 168 |
| | 62 |
|
| Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 1,422 |
| | $ | 529 |
| | $ | 893 |
| $ | 1,117 |
| | $ | 694 |
| | $ | 423 |
|
| In-Process R&D | 193 |
| | — |
| | 193 |
| 22 |
| | — |
| | 22 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,615 |
| | $ | 529 |
| | $ | 1,086 |
| $ | 1,139 |
| | $ | 694 |
| | $ | 445 |
|
In 2012,2015, we recorded additions to goodwill of $1,452$55 million and to other intangible assets of $13 million related to ten businesses including the Dakosingle acquisition discussed in Note 3, "Acquisitions".of the company, Cartagenia. During the year other intangible assets decreased $58 million, due to the impact of foreign exchange translation. During 2015, we also recordedremoved the gross carrying amount of $246 million and the related accumulated amortization of fully amortized intangible assets which were no longer being used.
In 2014, there were no additions to goodwill and intangible assets. In 2014, we recorded $12 million of impairment of other intangibles due to the exit of the NMR business.
In addition, we recorded $7863 million, including $183$4 million and zero of Dakoimpairments of other intangibles related to the cancellation of in-process research and development related to the same ten businesses. We recorded $8 million of foreign exchange translation impact to other intangibles in 2012.
In 2011, recorded additions to goodwill of $64 million relating to the purchase of three businesses. We also recorded a $27 million addition to goodwillprojects during the year in the electronic measurement segment relating to deferred taxes from a prior
acquisition. In 2011, we recorded additions to other intangibles of $42 million related to the purchase of three businesses. We also recorded $7 million of foreign exchange translation impact to other intangibles for the year. In 2011, in-process research2015, 2014 and development decreased $9 million from the prior year as amounts for completed projects were reclassified to purchased technology and we began amortization.2013, respectively.
Amortization of intangible assets was $136156 million in 20122015, $111189 million in 20112014, and $76190 million in 20102013. In addition, we recorded $1 million of impairments of other intangibles related to the cancellation of an in-process research and development project during 2012.
Future amortization expense related to existing finite-lived purchased intangible assets for the next five fiscal years and thereafter is estimated to be $188 million in 2013, $174 million for 2014, $154 million for 2015, $125 million for 2016, $78 million for 2017, and $367 million thereafter.below:
|
| | | |
| Estimated future amortization expense: | |
| (in millions) | |
| 2016 | $ | 131 |
|
| 2017 | $ | 92 |
|
| 2018 | $ | 61 |
|
| 2019 | $ | 47 |
|
| 2020 | $ | 36 |
|
| Thereafter | $ | 56 |
|
12. INVESTMENTS
Equity Investments
The following table summarizes the company's equity investments as of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 (net book value):
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Short-Term | | | | |
| Cost method investments | $ | 11 |
| | — |
| |
| | | | | |
| Long-Term | | | | | | |
| Cost method investments | $ | 59 |
| | $ | 65 |
| $ | 23 |
| | $ | 25 |
|
| Trading securities | 50 |
| | 49 |
| 35 |
| | 35 |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | — |
| | 3 |
| |
| Equity method investments | | 28 |
| | 36 |
|
| Total | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 117 |
| $ | 86 |
| | $ | 96 |
|
Cost method investments consist of non-marketable equity securities and two funds and are accounted for at historical cost. Short-term cost method investments are in the process of being sold, as of October 31, 2012 and are included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2012. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized currently in earnings. As of October 31, 2011Equity method investments designated as available-for-sale wereare reported at fair value, with unrealized gainsthe amount of the company’s initial investment and losses, netadjusted each period for the company’s share of tax, included in stockholders' equity.
All investments in available-for-sale securities were sold during the year ended October 31, 2012. Investments in available-for-sale securities at estimated fair value were as follows as of investee’s income or loss and dividend paid.October 31, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | October 31, 2011 |
| | | Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Estimated Fair Value |
| | (in millions) |
| Equity securities | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
| | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3 |
|
All of our investments, excluding trading securities, are subject to periodic impairment review. The impairment analysis requires significant judgment to identify events or circumstances that would likely have significant adverse effect on the future value of the investment. We consider various factors in determining whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, including the severity and duration of the impairment, forecasted recovery, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.
Amounts included in other income (expense), net for realized gains and lossesthe appropriate share of loss on the sale of available-for-sale securities and other than temporary impairmentsequity method investments were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 |
| | (in millions) |
| Available-for-sale investments — realized gain | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Other than temporary impairment on investments | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Equity method investments - share of losses | (9 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Net unrealized gains and losses on our trading securities portfolio were $52 million of unrealized gains in 20122015, $12 million of unrealized gains in 20112014 and $6 million of unrealized losses in 2010.
Realized gains from the sale of cost method securities were $2 million for 2012 and zero for 2011 and 2010.
Investments in Leases
In February 2001, we sold a parcel of surplus land in San Jose, California for $287 million in cash. In August 2001, we acquired a long-term leasehold interest in several municipal properties in southern California. In 2002, we received $237 million in non-refundable prepaid rent related to the leasehold interests described above.
In December 2011, we terminated our leasehold interest in the municipal properties, received $80 million in cash and recognized a loss of approximately $2 million2013.
12.13. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market and assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
Fair Value Hierarchy
The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels. A financial instrument's categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the asset or liability such as: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in less active markets; or other inputs that can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3 — applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are
significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 20122015 were as follows:
| | | | | | Fair Value Measurement at
October 31, 2012 Using | | | Fair Value Measurement at
October 31, 2015 Using |
| | October 31,
2012 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | October 31,
2015 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash equivalents (money market funds) | $ | 1,834 |
| | $ | 1,834 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,411 |
| | $ | 1,411 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange and interest rate swap contracts) | 7 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| |
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange contracts) | | 4 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
|
| Long-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities | 50 |
| | 50 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 35 |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 1,891 |
| | $ | 1,884 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,450 |
| | $ | 1,446 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange contracts) | $ | 6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Long-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred compensation liability | 48 |
| | — |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| 35 |
| | — |
| | 35 |
| | — |
|
| Total liabilities measured at fair value | $ | 54 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 40 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | — |
|
Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 20112014 were as follows:
| | | | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2011 Using | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2014 Using |
| | October 31,
2011 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | October 31,
2014 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Short-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash equivalents (money market funds) | $ | 1,972 |
| | $ | 1,972 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,117 |
| | $ | 1,117 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange and interest rate swap contracts) | 37 |
| | — |
| | 37 |
| | — |
| |
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange contracts) | | 10 |
| | — |
| | 10 |
| | — |
|
| Long-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading securities | 49 |
| | 49 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 35 |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Available-for-sale investments | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 2,061 |
| | $ | 2,024 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 1,162 |
| | $ | 1,152 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
| Short-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments (foreign exchange contracts) | $ | 11 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Long-term | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deferred compensation liability | 46 |
| | — |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| 35 |
| | — |
| | 35 |
| | — |
|
| Total liabilities measured at fair value | $ | 57 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 57 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 39 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 39 |
| | $ | — |
|
Our money market funds and trading securities and available-for-sale investments are generally valued using quoted market prices and therefore are classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Our derivative financial instruments are classified within level 2, as there is not an active market for each hedge contract, but the inputs used to calculate the value of the instruments are tied to active markets. Our deferred
compensation liability is classified as level 2 because although the values are not directly based on quoted market prices, the inputs used in the calculations are observable.
Trading securities and deferred compensation liability are reported at fair value, with gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized currently in net income. Investments designated as available-for-sale and certainCertain derivative instruments are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in stockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses from the sale of these instruments are recorded in net income.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Long-Lived Assets
For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the following table summarizes the impairments included in net income for the years ended October 31, 20122015, 2014 and 2011:2013:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Long-lived assets held and used | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 7 |
| $ | 3 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
| Long-lived assets held for sale | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
|
Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of $13 million were written down to their fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment charge of $13 million, which was included in net income for 20122015.
Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of $823 million were written down to their fair value of $1 millionzero, resulting in an impairment charge of $723 million, which was included in net income for 20112014. The impairment charge for 2014 includes $19 million relating to the exit of a business and $4 million related to various IPR&D projects that were written down to their fair value of zero. Long-lived assets held and used with a carrying amount of $1 million were written down to their fair value of zero, resulting in an impairment charge of $1 million, which was included in net income for 2013.
There were no impairments of long-lived assets held for sale in 2015 and 2014. Long-lived assets held for sale with a carrying amount of $4$3 million were written down to their fair value of $3$2 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $1$1 million which was included in net income for 2011.2013.
Fair values for the impaired long-lived assets were measured using level 2 inputs.
13.14. DERIVATIVES
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and interest rate changes in the normal course of our business. As part of risk management strategy, we use derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts, purchased options, and interest rate swaps, to hedge economic and/or accounting exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
Fair Value Hedges
We are exposed to interest rate risk due to the mismatch between the interest expense we pay on our loans at fixed rates and the variable rates of interest we receive from cash, cash equivalents and other short-term investments. We have issued long-term debt in U.S. dollars at fixed interest rates based on the market conditions at the time of financing. The fair value of our fixed rate debt changes when the underlying market rates of interest change, and, in the past, we have used interest rate swaps to change our fixed interest rate payments to U.S. dollar LIBOR-based variable interest expense to match the floating interest income from our cash, cash equivalents and other short term investments. As of October 31, 20122015, all interest rate swap contracts had either been terminated or had expired.
On November 25, 2008,, we terminated two interest rate swap contracts associated with our 2017 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $400$400 million. On October 20, 2014 we prepaid $500 million out of $600 million principal of our 2017 senior notes and fully amortized the associated proportionate deferred gain to other income (expense). The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination was approximately $43 million and the amountremaining gain to be amortized related to the $100 million of 2017 senior notes at October 31, 20122015 was $26 million.$2 million. On June 6, 2011, we also terminated five interest rate swap contracts associated with our 2015 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million. The asset value, including interest accrual, upon termination was approximately $31 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 2012 was $18 million. On August 9, 2011,, we
terminated five interest rate swap contracts related to our 2020 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million.$500 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination for these contracts was approximately $34 million and the amountgain to be amortized at October 31, 20122015 was $29 million. The proceeds$19 million. All deferred gains from all such terminated interest rate swaps are recorded as operating cash flows and the gain is being deferred and amortized over the remaining life of the respective senior notes.
Cash Flow Hedges
We enter into foreign exchange contracts to hedge our forecasted operational cash flow exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These foreign exchange contracts, carried at fair value, have maturities between one and twelve months.months. These derivative instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under the criteria prescribed in the authoritative guidance. The changes in the fair value of the effective portion of the derivative instrument are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. Amounts associated with cash flow hedges are reclassified to cost of sales in the consolidated statement of operations when either the forecasted transaction occurs oroccurs. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur.occur, the hedge relationship will be de-designated and amounts accumulated in other comprehensive income will be reclassified to other income (expense) in the current period. Changes in the fair value of the ineffective portion of derivative instruments are recognized in earningsother income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations in the current period. We record the premium paid (time value) of an option on the date of purchase as an asset. For options designated as cash flow hedges, changes in the time value are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are recognized in other income (expense) over the life of the option contract. Ineffectiveness in 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 was not significant. For the year ended October 31, 2012, we recognized a gain of less than $1 million in earnings in respect of cash flow hedge contracts which were de-designated. For the years ended October 31, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 gains and losses recognized in earnings due to de-designation of cash flow hedge contracts were not significant.
In July 2012, Agilent executed treasury lock agreements for $400 million in connection with future interest payments to be made on our 2022 senior notes issued on September 10, 2012. We designated the treasury lock as a cash flow hedge. The treasury lock contracts were terminated on September 10, 2012 and we recognized a deferred gain in accumulated other comprehensive income of $3 million to bewhich is being amortized to interest expense over the life of the 2022 senior notes. The remaining gain to be amortized related to the treasury lock agreements at October 31, 2015 was $2 million.
Other Hedges
Additionally, we enter into foreign exchange contracts to hedge monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of our subsidiaries. These foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value and do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are not designated as hedging instruments. Changes in value of the derivative are recognized in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations, in the current period, along with the offsetting foreign currency gain or loss on the underlying assets or liabilities.
In connection with the acquisition of Dako, Agilent entered into several foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the currency exchange risk associated with the payment of the purchase price in Danish Krone and the repayment of debt in multiple currencies. The aggregate notional amount of the currencies hedged was $1.7 billion. These foreign exchange contracts did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and were not designated as hedging instruments. The resulting loss on settlement, on the date of acquisition, was $14 million and was recorded in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended October 31, 2012.
Our use of derivative instruments exposes us to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. We do, however, seek to mitigate such risks by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions which are selected based on their credit ratings and other factors. We have established policies and procedures for mitigating credit risk that include establishing counterparty credit limits, monitoring credit exposures, and continually assessing the creditworthiness of counterparties.
A number of our derivative agreements contain threshold limits to the net liability position with counterparties and are dependent on our corporate credit rating determined by the major credit rating agencies. The counterparties to the derivative instruments may request collateralization, in accordance with derivative agreements, on derivative instruments in net liability positions.
The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position as of October 31, 20122015, was $4 million.$2 million. The credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had not been triggered as of October 31, 20122015.
There were 108 foreign exchange forward contracts and 8 foreign exchange option contracts open as of October 31, 2012 and designated as cash flow hedges. There were 18053 foreign exchange forward contracts open as of October 31, 20122015 and designated as cash flow hedges. There were 170 foreign exchange forward contracts open as of October 31, 2015 not designated as hedging instruments. The aggregated U.S. Dollar notional amounts by currency and designation as of October 31, 20122015 were as follows:
| | | | | Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | | Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Derivatives Designated as
Cash Flow Hedges
| | Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
| | | Forward Contracts | | Option Contracts | | Forward Contracts | | Forward
Contracts USD | | Forward
Contracts USD | | Forward Contracts DKK |
| Currency | | Buy/(Sell) | | Buy/(Sell) | | Buy/(Sell) | | Buy/(Sell) | | Buy/(Sell) | | Buy/(Sell) |
| | | (in millions) | | (in millions) |
| Euro | | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 273 |
| | $ | (19 | ) | | $ | 186 |
| | $ | (60 | ) |
| British Pound | | — |
| | — |
| | 53 |
| | (15 | ) | | (10 | ) | | (4 | ) |
| Canadian Dollar | | (46 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (23 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
| Australian Dollars | | — |
| | — |
| | 59 |
| | 10 |
| | 13 |
| | (3 | ) |
| Malaysian Ringgit | | 128 |
| | — |
| | 25 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
|
| Japanese Yen | | (29 | ) | | (111 | ) | | 103 |
| | (67 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| American Dollar | | | — |
| | — |
| | 33 |
|
| Other | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (24 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 21 |
| | (9 | ) |
| | | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 489 |
| | $ | (116 | ) | | $ | 201 |
| | $ | (46 | ) |
Derivative instruments are subject to master netting arrangements and are disclosed gross in the balance sheet in accordance with the authoritative guidance. The gross fair values and balance sheet location of derivative instruments held in the consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 were as follows:
| | Fair Values of Derivative Instruments | | Asset Derivatives | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives | Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| | | Fair Value | | | | Fair Value | | Fair Value | | | | Fair Value |
| Balance Sheet Location | | October 31,
2012 | | October 31,
2011 | | Balance Sheet Location | | October 31,
2012 | | October 31,
2011 | | October 31,
2015 | | October 31,
2014 | | Balance Sheet Location | | October 31,
2015 | | October 31,
2014 |
(in millions) | | Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value hedges | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest rate contracts | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other current assets | | $ | — |
| | $ | 3 |
| | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Other assets | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Other long-term liabilities | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Cash flow hedges | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other current assets | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
| | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | | | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other current assets | | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | Other accrued liabilities | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 3 |
|
| Total derivatives | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | | | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
The effect of derivative instruments for interest rate swap contracts and for foreign exchange contracts designated as hedging instruments and not designated as hedging instruments in our consolidated statement of operations were as follows:
| | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value Hedges | | | | | | |
| Gain on interest rate swap contracts, including interest accrual, recognized in interest expense | $ | — |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 78 |
| |
| Gain (loss) on hedged item, recognized in interest expense | $ | 3 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | (57 | ) | |
| Cash Flow Hedges | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
| $ | 11 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 10 |
|
| Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into cost of sales | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | 7 |
| $ | 18 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 13 |
|
| Treasury Lock Agreements | | | | | | |
| Gain recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income | $ | 3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gain (loss) recognized in other income (expense), net | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | 13 |
| | $ | (14 | ) | |
| Gain (loss) recognized in other income (expense), net within continuing operations | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | 10 |
|
The estimated net amount of existing gain at October 31, 20122015 that is expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income to the cost of sales within the next twelve months is $21 million.
14. RESTRUCTURING COSTS, ASSET IMPAIRMENTS AND OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES15. EXIT OF NMR BUSINESS
Our 2009 restructuring program,During the ("FY 2009 Plan"fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, we made the decision to cease the manufacture and sale of our nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”), announced product line within our life sciences and applied markets segment. The exit of the NMR business was primarily due to the lack of growth and profitability of the product line. These actions involved severance and other personnel costs related to the workforce reduction of approximately 300 employees primarily located in the first halfUnited Kingdom and California and non-cash charges related to intangible asset impairments and other asset write-downs including inventory. After including employee reductions due to attrition and the application to open positions and acceptance of 2009, was conceived in responseemployment within the company of some employees previously affected, we have approximately 30 employees that are pending termination under the above actions as of October 31, 2015. We expect to deteriorating economic conditions and was designed to deliver sufficient savings to enable our businesses to reach their profitability targets throughout the cycle. Workforce reduction payments, primarily severance, were largely complete inthese restructuring activities by early fiscal year 2010. Lease payments should primarily be complete by the end of fiscal 2014.2016.
A summary of total “NMR” restructuring activity and other special charges is shown in the table below:
| | | | Workforce Reduction | | Consolidation of Excess Facilities | | Impairment of Building and Purchased Intangible Assets | | Special Charges related to Inventory | | Total | Workforce Reduction | Impairments of Building and Other Assets | Special Charges Related to Inventory and Others | Total |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2009 | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 69 |
| |
| Balance as of October 31, 2013 | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
| Income statement expense | 39 |
| | 19 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 64 |
| 16 |
| 19 |
| 33 |
| 68 |
|
| Asset impairments/inventory charges | — |
| | — |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | (6 | ) | — |
| (19 | ) | (30 | ) | (49 | ) |
| Cash payments | (80 | ) | | (12 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (92 | ) | (2 | ) | — |
| — |
| (2 | ) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2010 | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 35 |
| |
| Income statement expense | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| |
| Balance as of October 31, 2014 | | $ | 14 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 3 |
| $ | 17 |
|
| Income statement expense/(reversal) | | (2 | ) | — |
| 8 |
| 6 |
|
| Asset impairments/inventory charges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) |
| Cash payments | (9 | ) | | (12 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (22 | ) | (10 | ) | — |
| (3 | ) | (13 | ) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2011 | $ | — |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15 |
| |
| Income statement expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Asset impairments/inventory charges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Cash payments | — |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
| |
|
| | (4 | ) | |
| Balance as of October 31, 2012 | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
| |
| Balance as of October 31, 2015 | | $ | 2 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 8 |
|
The restructuring and other special accruals for all plans,related to the NMR closure, which totaled $11$8 million at October 31, 2012,2015, are recorded in other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. These balances reflect estimated future cash outlays.
A summary of the charges in the consolidated statement of operations resulting from all restructuring plansthe NMR closure is shown below:
| | | | Years Ended | Year Ended | | Year Ended |
| | October 31, | October 31, | | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cost of products and services | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 8 |
| $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 48 |
|
| Research and development | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| 4 |
| | 5 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative | — |
| | 2 |
| | 53 |
| 4 |
| | 15 |
|
| Total restructuring, asset impairments and other special charges | $ | — |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 64 |
| $ | 6 |
| | $ | 68 |
|
15.16. RETIREMENT PLANS AND POST RETIREMENT PENSION PLANS
General. Substantially all of our employees are covered under various defined benefit and/or defined contribution retirement plans. Additionally, we sponsor post-retirement health care benefits for our eligible U.S. employees.
Agilent provides U.S. employees, who meet eligibility criteria under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Retirement Plan ("RP"(the "RP"), defined benefits which are based on an employee's base or target pay during the years of employment and on length of service. For eligible service through October 31, 1993, the benefit payable under the Agilent Retirement PlanPlans is reduced by any amounts due to the eligible employee under ourthe Agilent defined contribution Deferred Profit-Sharing Plan ("DPSP"(the "DPSP"), which was closed to new participants as of November 1993. Effective November 1, 2014, Agilent’s U.S. defined benefit retirement plan is closed to new entrants including new employees, new transfers to the U.S. payroll and rehires. These employees will instead be eligible for an enhanced 6 percent employer match in the Agilent 401(k) plan. Current eligible employees will continue to participate in the U.S. defined benefit retirement plan and will remain eligible for the 401(k) plan with the current 4 percent employer match. Retirees maintain the retirement benefits they are eligible for as of November 1, 2014.
As of October 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of plan assets of the DPSP was $169 million and $520 million, respectively. Note that the projected benefit obligation for the DPSP equals the fair value of plan assets.
In addition to the DPSP, in the U.S., Agilent maintains thea Supplemental Benefits Retirement Plan ("SBRP"), a supplemental unfunded non-qualified defined benefit plan to provide benefits that would be provided under the RP but for limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The RP and the SBRP comprise the "U.S. Plans".
As of October 31, 2012 and 2011, in the fair value of plan assets of the DPSP for U.S. Agilent Employees was $534 million and $515 million, respectively. Note that the projected benefit obligation for the DPSP equals the fair value of plan assets.tables below.
Eligible employees outside the U.S. generally receive retirement benefits under various retirement plans based upon factors such as years of service and/or employee compensation levels. Eligibility is generally determined in accordance with local statutory requirements.
401(k) defined contribution plan.plan. Eligible Agilent U.S. employees may participate in the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"). Enrollment in the 401(k) Plan is automatic for employees who meet eligibility requirements unless they decline participation.Plan. Under the 401(k) Plan, we provide matching contributions to employees up to a maximum of 4 percent of an employee's annual eligible compensation. Effective November 1, 2014, new employees and new transfers to the U.S. payroll and rehires are eligible for an enhanced 6 percent employer match in the Agilent 401(k) Plan. The maximum contribution to the 401(k) Plan is 50 percent of an employee's annual eligible compensation, subject to regulatory limitations. The 401(k) Plan employer expense included in income from continuing operations was $25$14 million in 2012, $242015, $15 million in 20112014 and $21$13 million in 2010.2013.
Post-retirement medical benefit plans. In addition to receiving retirement benefits, Agilent U.S. employees who meet eligibility requirements as of their termination date may participate in the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Health Plan for Retirees. Eligible retirees who were less than age 50 as of January 1, 2005 and who retire after age 55 with 15 or more years of service are eligible for a fixed amount which can be utilized to pay for either Agilent sponsored plans and/or individual medicare plans. Eligible retirees who were at least age 50 as of January 1, 2005 and who retire after age 55 with 15 or more years of service currently choose from managed-care, indemnity options or individual medicare plans, with the company subsidization level or stipend dependent on a number of factors including eligibility and length of service. See Plan Amendments below for changes to these benefits.
Plan Amendments.On April 1, 2011, changes to the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Health Plan for Retirees were approved. Effective January 1, 2012, employees who were at least age 50 as of January 1, 2005 and who retire after age 55 with 15 or more years of service are eligible for fixed dollar subsidies and stipends. Grandfathered retirees receive a fixed monthly subsidy toward pre-65 premium costs (subsidy capped at 2011 levels) and a fixed monthly stipend post-65. The subsidy amounts will not increase. In connection with these changes, we reduced our Accumulated Prospective Benefit Obligation by $194 million withaddition, any new employee hired on or after November 1, 2014, will not be eligible to participate in the offset goingretiree medical plans upon retiring. Current eligible employees will continue to accumulated other comprehensive income.
participate in the retiree medical program in place as of November 1, 2014. Retirees will maintain the retiree medical benefits they are eligible for as of November 1, 2014.
Components of net periodic cost. The company uses alternate methods of amortization as allowed by the authoritative guidance which amortizes the actuarial gains and losses on a consistent basis for the years presented. For U.S. Plans, gains and losses are amortized over the average future working lifetime. For most Non-U.S. Plans and U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans, gains and losses are amortized using a separate layer for each year's gains and losses. For the years ended October 31, 20122015, 20112014 and 20102013, components of net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income were comprised of:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pensions | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | Pensions | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | |
| | U.S. Plans | | Non-U.S. Plans | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost — benefits earned during the period | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | 25 |
| | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 44 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 36 |
| | $ | 36 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
| Interest cost on benefit obligation | 27 |
| | 28 |
| | 27 |
| | 74 |
| | 72 |
| | 72 |
| | 15 |
| | 21 |
| | 26 |
| 14 |
| | 34 |
| | 24 |
| | 23 |
| | 74 |
| | 68 |
| | 4 |
| | 12 |
| | 12 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | (46 | ) | | (44 | ) | | (41 | ) | | (92 | ) | | (94 | ) | | (87 | ) | | (19 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (20 | ) | (27 | ) | | (64 | ) | | (51 | ) | | (42 | ) | | (118 | ) | | (97 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (20 | ) |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | 7 |
| | 4 |
| | 7 |
| | 42 |
| | 40 |
| | 35 |
| | 16 |
| | 14 |
| | 16 |
| 3 |
| | 1 |
| | 13 |
| | 25 |
| | 48 |
| | 55 |
| | 6 |
| | 14 |
| | 18 |
|
| Amortization of prior service benefit | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (26 | ) | | (14 | ) | (5 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (35 | ) |
| Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) | 16 |
| | 18 |
| | 22 |
| | 56 |
| | 49 |
| | 49 |
| | (20 | ) | | (9 | ) | | 11 |
| |
| Curtailments and settlements | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Total periodic benefit cost (benefit) | | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 39 |
| | $ | 61 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) |
| Summary of total periodic benefit cost (benefit): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations | | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 38 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) |
| Discontinued operations | | — |
| | 3 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | (14 | ) | | (10 | ) |
| Total periodic benefit cost (benefit) | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 49 |
| | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 11 |
| $ | 10 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 39 |
| | $ | 61 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (28 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) |
| Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net actuarial (gain) loss | $ | 69 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | $ | (25 | ) | | $ | 214 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 44 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | (122 | ) | | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 173 |
| | $ | (85 | ) | | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 12 |
| | $ | (57 | ) |
| Amortization of net actuarial loss | (7 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (42 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (35 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (16 | ) | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (25 | ) | | (48 | ) | | (55 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (14 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Prior service cost (benefit) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (194 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of prior service benefit | 12 |
| | 12 |
| | 12 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 35 |
| | 26 |
| | 14 |
| 5 |
| | 12 |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 12 |
| | 35 |
| | 35 |
|
| Foreign currency | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | 11 |
| | 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10 |
| | (28 | ) | | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss | $ | 74 |
| | $ | 39 |
| | $ | (20 | ) | | $ | 168 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | (170 | ) | | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 97 |
| | $ | (123 | ) | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 96 |
| | $ | (137 | ) | | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | (40 | ) |
| Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost (benefit) and other comprehensive (income) loss | $ | 90 |
| | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 224 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | (179 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 56 |
| | $ | 102 |
| | $ | (105 | ) | | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 135 |
| | $ | (76 | ) | | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | (61 | ) |
In 2010, due to reductions in workforce which impacted two non-U.S. plans, we recorded curtailment losses as required by authoritative guidance with no impact to the income statement.
In 2011, due to payments exceeding the sum of service cost plus interest cost in the U.S. Supplemental Benefits Retirement Plan, we recorded a $1 million settlement gain in the income statement as required by authoritative guidance.
Funded status. As of October 31, 20122015 and 20112014, the funded status of the defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans was:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value — beginning of year | $ | 837 |
| | $ | 782 |
| | $ | 2,108 |
| | $ | 2,045 |
| | $ | 284 |
| | $ | 288 |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 6 |
| | 64 |
| | 53 |
| | 180 |
| | 2 |
| | 18 |
|
| Employer contributions | 15 |
| | 30 |
| | 25 |
| | 72 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Participants' contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefits paid | (21 | ) | | (39 | ) | | (20 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (23 | ) |
| Transfer due to Keysight separation | (490 | ) | | — |
| | (1,327 | ) | | — |
| | (187 | ) | | — |
|
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | (62 | ) | | (130 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Fair value — end of year | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 837 |
| | $ | 778 |
| | $ | 2,108 |
| | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 284 |
|
| Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation — beginning of year | $ | 889 |
| | $ | 763 |
| | $ | 2,344 |
| | $ | 2,199 |
| | $ | 309 |
| | $ | 307 |
|
| Service cost | 25 |
| | 46 |
| | 18 |
| | 36 |
| | 2 |
| | 3 |
|
| Interest cost | 14 |
| | 34 |
| | 23 |
| | 74 |
| | 4 |
| | 12 |
|
| Participants' contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Plan amendment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 23 |
| | 85 |
| | 40 |
| | 236 |
| | 11 |
| | 10 |
|
| Benefits paid | (22 | ) | | (39 | ) | | (20 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (23 | ) |
| Transfer due to Keysight separation | (514 | ) | | — |
| | (1,429 | ) | | — |
| | (206 | ) | | — |
|
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | (77 | ) | | (140 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefit obligation — end of year | $ | 415 |
| | $ | 889 |
| | $ | 900 |
| | $ | 2,344 |
| | $ | 112 |
| | $ | 309 |
|
| Overfunded (underfunded) status of PBO | $ | (68 | ) | | $ | (52 | ) | | $ | (122 | ) | | $ | (236 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (25 | ) |
| Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Continuing operations: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | (66 | ) | | (28 | ) | | (148 | ) | | (147 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Net asset (liability) - continuing operations | $ | (68 | ) | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (122 | ) | | $ | (125 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) |
| Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | — |
| | (22 | ) | | — |
| | (159 | ) | | — |
| | (19 | ) |
| Net asset (liability) - discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (19 | ) |
| Total net asset (liability) | $ | (68 | ) | | $ | (52 | ) | | $ | (122 | ) | | $ | (236 | ) | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (25 | ) |
| Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Actuarial (gains) losses | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 256 |
| | $ | 621 |
| | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 118 |
|
| Prior service costs (benefits) | (18 | ) | | (55 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) | | (40 | ) | | (149 | ) |
| Total | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 256 |
| | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | (31 | ) |
In connection with the separation of Keysight Technologies on November 1, 2014, Agilent transferred certain liabilities and assets of the U.S. and Non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans, and U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans to similar plans created for Keysight Technologies employees. Total transfers are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (in millions) |
| Change in fair value of plan assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair value — beginning of year | $ | 578 |
| | $ | 538 |
| | $ | 1,684 |
| | $ | 1,598 |
| | $ | 258 |
| | $ | 263 |
|
| Actual return on plan assets | 65 |
| | 37 |
| | 158 |
| | 35 |
| | 25 |
| | 18 |
|
| Employer contributions | 30 |
| | 30 |
| | 54 |
| | 59 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Participants' contributions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefits paid | (19 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (23 | ) |
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | (49 | ) | | 31 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fair value — end of year | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 578 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 1,684 |
| | $ | 261 |
| | $ | 258 |
|
| Change in benefit obligation: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation — beginning of year | $ | 637 |
| | $ | 575 |
| | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | 1,742 |
| | $ | 319 |
| | $ | 502 |
|
| Service cost | 40 |
| | 42 |
| | 33 |
| | 32 |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
|
| Interest cost | 27 |
| | 28 |
| | 74 |
| | 72 |
| | 15 |
| | 21 |
|
| Participants' contributions | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Plan amendment | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | (194 | ) |
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 87 |
| | 21 |
| | 280 |
| | (20 | ) | | 28 |
| | 8 |
|
| Benefits paid | (20 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (46 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (21 | ) |
| Curtailments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
|
| | — |
|
| Currency impact | — |
| | — |
| | (54 | ) | | 37 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefit obligation — end of year | $ | 771 |
| | $ | 637 |
| | $ | 2,117 |
| | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | 343 |
| | $ | 319 |
|
| Overfunded (underfunded) status of PBO | $ | (117 | ) | | $ | (59 | ) | | $ | (316 | ) | | $ | (146 | ) | | $ | (82 | ) | | $ | (61 | ) |
| Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other assets | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Employee compensation and benefits | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Retirement and post-retirement benefits | (115 | ) | | (57 | ) | | (316 | ) | | (164 | ) | | (82 | ) | | (61 | ) |
| Net asset (liability) | $ | (117 | ) | | $ | (59 | ) | | $ | (316 | ) | | $ | (146 | ) | | $ | (82 | ) | | $ | (61 | ) |
| Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Actuarial (gains) losses | $ | 127 |
| | $ | 66 |
| | $ | 683 |
| | $ | 524 |
| | $ | 194 |
| | $ | 188 |
|
| Prior service costs (benefits) | (79 | ) | | (91 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (218 | ) | | (253 | ) |
| Total | $ | 48 |
| | $ | (25 | ) | | $ | 675 |
| | $ | 515 |
| | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | (65 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | (in millions) |
| Fair value of plan assets transferred to Keysight | $ | 490 |
| | $ | 1,327 |
| | $ | 187 |
|
| Benefit obligation transferred to Keysight | $ | 514 |
| | $ | 1,429 |
| | $ | 206 |
|
The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized by Agilent as components of net expense during 20132016 are as follows:
| | | | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Amortization of net prior service cost (benefit) | $ | (12 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (10 | ) |
| Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain) | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 18 |
| $ | 8 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 10 |
|
Investment policies and strategies as of October 31, 2012, 20112015 and 20102014. In the U.S., target asset allocations for our Agilent Retirement Planretirement and post-retirement benefit target asset allocationsplans are approximately 80 percent to equities and approximately 20 percent to fixed income investments. Our DPSP target asset allocation is approximately 60 percent to equities and approximately 40 percent to fixed income investments. Approximately, 5 percent of our U.S. equity portfolio consists of limited partnerships. The general investment objective for all our plan assets is to obtain the optimum rate of investment return on the total investment portfolio consistent with the assumption of a reasonable level of risk. Specific investment objectives for the plans' portfolios are to: maintain and enhance the purchasing power of the plans' assets; achieve investment returns consistent with the level of risk being taken;
and earn performance rates of return in accordance with the benchmarks adopted for each asset class. Outside the U.S., our target asset allocation is from 37 to 60 percent to equities, from 40 to 60 percent to fixed income investments, and from zero to 6 percent to real estate investments and from zero to 7 percent to cash, depending on the plan. All plans' assets are broadly diversified. Due to fluctuations in equity markets, our actual allocations of plan assets at October 31, 20122015 and 20112014 differ from the target allocation. Our policy is to bring the actual allocation in line with the target allocation.
Equity securities include exchange-traded common stock and preferred stock of companies from broadly diversified industries. Fixed income securities include a global portfolio of corporate bonds of companies from diversified industries, government securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, derivative instruments and other. Other investments include a group trust consisting primarily of private equity partnerships as well as other investments. Portions of the cash and cash equivalent, equity, and fixed income investments are held in commingled funds.
Fair Value. The measurement of the fair value of pension and post-retirement plan assets uses the valuation methodologies and the inputs as described in Note 12.13, "Fair Value Measurements".
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents consist of short-term investment funds. The funds also invest in short-term domestic fixed income securities and other securities with debt-like characteristics emphasizing short-term maturities and quality. Cash and cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 investments except when the cash and cash equivalents are held in commingled funds, which have a daily net value derived from quoted prices for the underlying securities in active markets; these are classified as Level 2 investments.
Equity - Some equity securities consisting of common and preferred stock are held in commingled funds, which have daily net asset values derived from quoted prices for the underlying securities in active markets; these are classified as Level 2 investments. Commingled funds which have quoted prices in active markets are classified as Level 1 investments.
Fixed Income - Some of the fixed income securities are held in commingled funds, which have daily net asset values derived from the underlying securities; these are classified as Level 2 investments. Commingled funds which have quoted prices in active markets are classified as Level 1 investments.
Other Investments - Other investments includes property based pooled vehicles which invest in real estate. Market net asset values are regularly published in the financial press or on corporate websites and so these investments are classified as Level 2. Other investments also includes partnership investments where, due to their private nature, pricing inputs are not readily observable. Asset valuations are developed by the general partners that manage the partnerships. These valuations are based on proprietary appraisals, application of public market multiples to private company cash flows, utilization of market transactions that provide valuation information for comparable companies and other methods. Holdings of limited partnerships are classified as Level 3.
The following table presentstables present the fair value of U.S. Defined Benefit Plans assets classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 20122015 and 2014.
| | | | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2012 Using | | | Fair Value Measurement
at October 31, 2015 Using |
| | October 31,
2012 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | October 31,
2015 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 3 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 486 |
| | 134 |
| | 352 |
| | — |
| 258 |
| | 61 |
| | 197 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 137 |
| | 15 |
| | 122 |
| | — |
| 76 |
| | 22 |
| | 54 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 23 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 21 |
| 10 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 9 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 152 |
| | $ | 481 |
| | $ | 21 |
| $ | 347 |
| | $ | 84 |
| | $ | 254 |
| | $ | 9 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurement
at October 31, 2014 Using |
| | October 31,
2014 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 668 |
| | 156 |
| | 512 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 145 |
| | 40 |
| | 105 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 15 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 14 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 837 |
| | $ | 199 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 14 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Assets measured at fair value - continuing operations | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 260 |
| | $ | 14 |
|
| Assets measured at fair value - discontinued operations | 490 |
| | 126 |
| | 364 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 837 |
| | $ | 199 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 14 |
|
For U.S. Defined Benefit Plans assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), the following table summarizes the change in balances during 20122015 and 20112014: for continuing operations:
| | | | Years Ended October 31. | Years Ended October 31. |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 29 |
| $ | 14 |
| | $ | 17 |
|
| Realized gains | 3 |
| | 8 |
| |
| Realized gains/(losses) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Unrealized gains/(losses) | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | | 2 |
|
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements | (6 | ) | | — |
| (2 | ) | | (4 | ) |
| Transfers in (out) | — |
| | (8 | ) | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance, end of year | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 26 |
| $ | 9 |
| | $ | 14 |
|
The following table presentstables present the fair value of U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans assets classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 20122015 and 2014.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurement at
October 31, 2015 Using |
| | October 31,
2015 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 62 |
| | 15 |
| | 47 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 20 |
| | 6 |
| | 14 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | 62 |
| | $ | 6 |
|
| | | | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2012 Using | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2014 Using |
| | October 31,
2012 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | October 31,
2014 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 6 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 189 |
| | 52 |
| | 137 |
| | — |
| 217 |
| | 51 |
| | 166 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 54 |
| | 6 |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| 53 |
| | 14 |
| | 39 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 13 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 12 |
| 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 261 |
| | $ | 61 |
| | $ | 188 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | 284 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 208 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Assets measured at fair value - continuing operations | | $ | 97 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| Assets measured at fair value - discontinued operations | | 187 |
| | 49 |
| | 138 |
| | — |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | | $ | 284 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 208 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
For U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), the following table summarizes the change in balances during 20122015 and 20112014: for continuing operations:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 16 |
| $ | 8 |
| | $ | 10 |
|
| Realized gains | 2 |
| | 5 |
| |
| Realized gains/(losses) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Unrealized gains/(losses) | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements | (4 | ) | | — |
| (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Transfers in (out) | — |
| | (4 | ) | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance, end of year | $ | 12 |
| | $ | 15 |
| $ | 6 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
The following table presentstables present the fair value of non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans assets classified under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of October 31, 20122015: and 2014:
| | | | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2012 Using | | | Fair Value Measurement at October 31, 2015 Using |
| | October 31,
2012 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | October 31,
2015 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 3 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 861 |
| | 226 |
| | 635 |
| | — |
| 396 |
| | 172 |
| | 224 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 900 |
| | 19 |
| | 881 |
| | — |
| 379 |
| | 13 |
| | 366 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 37 |
| | — |
| | 37 |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | $ | 1,553 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 778 |
| | $ | 186 |
| | $ | 592 |
| | $ | — |
|
Table of Contents |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value Measurement
at October 31, 2014 Using |
| | October 31,
2014 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| | (in millions) |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity | 1,078 |
| | 335 |
| | 743 |
| | — |
|
| Fixed Income | 974 |
| | 37 |
| | 937 |
| | — |
|
| Other Investments | 46 |
| | — |
| | 25 |
| | 21 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 2,108 |
| | $ | 375 |
| | $ | 1,712 |
| | $ | 21 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Assets measured at fair value - continuing operations | $ | 790 |
| | $ | 200 |
| | $ | 586 |
| | $ | 4 |
|
| Assets measured at fair value - discontinued operations | 1,318 |
| | 175 |
| | 1,126 |
| | 17 |
|
| Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 2,108 |
| | $ | 375 |
| | $ | 1,712 |
| | $ | 21 |
|
For non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans, there was no activity relating to assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), the following table summarizes the changes in balances during fiscal year 20122015 and 2011.2014 for continuing operations:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| Balance, beginning of year | $ | 4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Realized gains/(losses) | 1 |
| | — |
|
| Unrealized gains/(losses) | — |
| | — |
|
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements | (5 | ) | | — |
|
| Transfers in (out) | — |
| | 4 |
|
| Balance, end of year | $ | — |
| | $ | 4 |
|
The table below presents the combined projected benefit obligation ("PBO"), accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") and fair value of plan assets, grouping plans using comparisons of the PBO and ABO relative to the plan assets as of October 31, 20122015 or 2011.2014.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | Benefit Obligation | | | | Benefit Obligation | | |
| | Fair Value of Plan Assets | | Fair Value of Plan Assets |
| | PBO | | PBO | |
| | (in millions) |
| U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds the fair value of plan assets | $ | 771 |
| | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 637 |
| | $ | 578 |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds PBO | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 771 |
| | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 637 |
| | $ | 578 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets | $ | 2,117 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 1,760 |
| | $ | 1,598 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds PBO | — |
| | — |
| | 70 |
| | 86 |
|
| Total | $ | 2,117 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 1,830 |
| | $ | 1,684 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | ABO | | | | ABO | | |
| U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds the fair value of plan assets | $ | 749 |
| | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 578 |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where the fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 749 |
| | $ | 654 |
| | $ | 624 |
| | $ | 578 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets | $ | 2,034 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 1,699 |
| | $ | 1,598 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO | — |
| | — |
| | 67 |
| | 86 |
|
| Total | $ | 2,034 |
| | $ | 1,801 |
| | $ | 1,766 |
| | $ | 1,684 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | Benefit Obligation | | | | Benefit Obligation | | |
| | Fair Value of Plan Assets | | Fair Value of Plan Assets |
| | PBO | | PBO | |
| | (in millions) |
| U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds the fair value of plan assets - continuing operations | $ | 415 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 375 |
| | $ | 347 |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds the fair value of plan assets - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 514 |
| | 490 |
|
| Total | $ | 415 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 889 |
| | $ | 837 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets - continuing operations | $ | 771 |
| | $ | 623 |
| | $ | 754 |
| | $ | 607 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where PBO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 1,111 |
| | 952 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds PBO - continuing operations | 129 |
| | 155 |
| | 161 |
| | 183 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds PBO - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 318 |
| | 366 |
|
| Total | $ | 900 |
| | $ | 778 |
| | $ | 2,344 |
| | $ | 2,108 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | ABO | | | | ABO | | |
| U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds the fair value of plan assets - continuing operations | $ | 389 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | — |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds the fair value of plan assets - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where the fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO - continuing operations | — |
| | — |
| | 340 |
| | 347 |
|
| U.S. defined benefit plans where the fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 472 |
| | 490 |
|
| Total | $ | 389 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 826 |
| | $ | 837 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets - continuing operations | $ | 732 |
| | $ | 623 |
| | $ | 714 |
| | $ | 607 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where ABO exceeds or is equal to the fair value of plan assets - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 1,081 |
| | 952 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO - continuing operations | 127 |
| | 155 |
| | 158 |
| | 183 |
|
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans where fair value of plan assets exceeds ABO - discontinued operations | — |
| | — |
| | 310 |
| | 366 |
|
| Total | $ | 859 |
| | $ | 778 |
| | $ | 2,263 |
| | $ | 2,108 |
|
Contributions and estimated future benefit payments. During fiscal year 20132016, we expect to contribute $300 million to the U.S. defined benefit plans, $54$25 million to plans outside the U.S., and $21 million to the Post-retirement Medical Plans. The following table presents expected future benefit payments for the next 10 years.years:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | (in millions) |
| 2013 | $ | 59 |
| | $ | 53 |
| | $ | 25 |
|
| 2014 | $ | 60 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 25 |
|
| 2015 | $ | 61 |
| | $ | 59 |
| | $ | 26 |
|
| 2016 | $ | 62 |
| | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 26 |
|
| 2017 | $ | 63 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 26 |
|
| 2018 - 2022 | $ | 266 |
| | $ | 449 |
| | $ | 128 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans | | U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plans |
| | (in millions) |
| 2016 | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| 2017 | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 9 |
|
| 2018 | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| 2019 | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| 2020 | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 8 |
|
| 2021 - 2025 | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 40 |
|
Assumptions. The assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations and expense for our defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans are presented in the tables below. The expected long-term return on assets below represents an estimate of long-term returns on investment portfolios consisting of a mixture of equities, fixed income and alternative investments in proportion to the asset allocations of each of our plans. We consider long-term rates of return, which are weighted based on the asset classes (both historical and forecasted) in which we expect our pension and post-retirement funds to be invested. Discount rates reflect the current rate at which pension and post-retirement obligations could be settled based on the measurement dates of the plans - October 31. The U.S. discount rates at October 31, 20122014 and 20112015, were determined based on the results of matching expected plan benefit payments with cash flows from a hypothetically constructed bond portfolio. The non-U.S. rates
were generally based on published rates for high-quality corporate bonds. The range of assumptions that were used for the non-U.S. defined benefit plans reflects the different economic environments within various countries.
Assumptions used to calculate the net periodic cost in each year were as follows:
| | | | For years ended October 31, | For years ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| U.S. defined benefit plans: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.50% | | 5.00% | | 5.25% | 4.00% | | 4.00-4.50% | | 3.25% |
| Average increase in compensation levels | 3.50% | | 3.50% | | 3.50% | 3.50% | | 3.50% | | 3.50% |
| Expected long-term return on assets | 8.00% | | 8.25% | | 8.50% | 8.00% | | 8.00% | | 8.00% |
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 2.00-5.50% | | 2.00-5.25% | | 2.25-5.75% | 1.50-4.00% | | 1.50-4.50% | | 1.50-4.50% |
| Average increase in compensation levels | 2.50-3.25% | | 2.50-3.75% | | 2.50-3.75% | 2.5-3.25% | | 2.50-3.25% | | 2.50-3.00% |
| Expected long-term return on assets | 4.00-6.50% | | 4.00-6.75% | | 4.25-7.00% | 4.00-6.50% | | 4.00-6.50% | | 4.00-6.50% |
| U.S. post-retirement benefits plans: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 4.75% | | 5.50% | | 5.50% | 4.00% | | 4.00-4.25% | | 3.50% |
| Expected long-term return on assets | 8.00% | | 8.25% | | 8.50% | 8.00% | | 8.00% | | 8.00% |
| Current medical cost trend rate | 9.00% | | 10.00% | | 10.00% | 8.00% | | 8.00% | | 9.00% |
| Ultimate medical cost trend rate | 4.50% | | 4.75% | | 5.00% | 3.50% | | 3.50% | | 3.50% |
| Medical cost trend rate decreases to ultimate rate in year | 2026 | | 2025 | | 2019 | 2028 | | 2028 | | 2027 |
Assumptions used to calculate the benefit obligation were as follows:
| | | | As of the Years Ending October 31, | As of the Years Ending October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| U.S. defined benefit plans: | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.25% | | 4.50% | 4.20% | | 4.00% |
| Average increase in compensation levels | 3.50% | | 3.50% | 3.50% | | 3.50% |
| Non-U.S. defined benefit plans: | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 1.50-4.50% | | 2.00-5.50% | 0.77-3.76% | | 1.50-4.00% |
| Average increase in compensation levels | 2.50-3.00% | | 2.50-3.25% | 2.25-4.00% | | 2.50-3.25% |
| U.S. post-retirement benefits plans: | | | | | | |
| Discount rate | 3.50% | | 4.75% | 4.00% | | 3.75-4.00% |
| Current medical cost trend rate | 9.00% | | 9.00% | 7.00% | | 8.00% |
| Ultimate medical cost trend rate | 3.50% | | 4.50% | 3.50% | | 3.50% |
| Medical cost trend rate decreases to ultimate rate in year | 2027 | | 2026 | 2029 | | 2028 |
Due to the benefit changes discussed previously, healthHealth care trend rates do not have a significant effect on the total service and interest cost components or on the post-retirement benefit obligation amounts reported for the U.S. Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for the year ended October 31, 20122015.
16.17. GUARANTEES
Standard Warranty
We accrue for standard warranty costs based on historical trends in warranty charges as a percentage of net product shipments. The accrual is reviewed regularly and periodically adjusted to reflect changes in warranty cost estimates. Estimated warranty charges are recorded within cost of products at the time products are sold. The standard warranty accrual balances are held in other accrued and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. Our standard warranty terms typically extend between one and three years from the date of delivery, depending on the product.
A summary of the standard warranty accrual activity is shown in the table below. The standard warranty accrual balances are held in other accrued and other long-term liabilities.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (in millions) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2011 and 2010 | $ | 50 |
| | $ | 45 |
|
| Reserve acquired upon close of Dako acquisition | 1 |
| | — |
|
| Accruals for warranties including change in estimates | 87 |
| | 72 |
|
| Settlements made during the period | (78 | ) | | (67 | ) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2012 and 2011 | $ | 60 |
| | $ | 50 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2014 and 2013 | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 31 |
|
| Accruals for warranties including change in estimates | 53 |
| | 44 |
|
| Settlements made during the period | (52 | ) | | (45 | ) |
| Balance as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 30 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| Accruals for warranties due within one year | 29 |
| | 26 |
|
| Accruals for warranties due after one year | 2 |
| | 4 |
|
| Balance as of October 31, 2015 and 2014 | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 30 |
|
Indemnifications to Keysight
In connection with the separation of Keysight from Agilent on November 1, 2014 we agreed to indemnify Keysight and its affiliates against certain damages and expenses that might occur in the future. These indemnifications cover a variety of liabilities, including, but not limited to, employee, tax and environmental matters. The agreements containing these indemnifications have been previously disclosed as exhibits to our current report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2014. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 2015.
Indemnifications to Avago
In connection with the sale of our semiconductor products business in December 2005, we agreed to indemnify Avago, its affiliates and other related parties against certain damages and expenses that it might incur in the future. The continuing indemnifications primarily cover damages and expenses relating to liabilities of the businesses that Agilent retained and did not transfer to Avago, as well as pre-closing taxes and other specified items. In connection with the separation of Keysight from Agilent, Keysight assumed the indemnification obligations to Avago. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
Indemnifications to Verigy
In connection with the spin-off of Verigy, we agreed to indemnify Verigy and its affiliates against certain damages which it might incur in the future. These indemnifications primarily cover damages relating to liabilities of the businesses that Agilent did not transfer to Verigy, liabilities that might arise under limited portions of Verigy's IPO materials that relate to Agilent, and costs and expenses incurred by Agilent or Verigy to effect the IPO, arising out of the distribution of Agilent's remaining holding in Verigy ordinary shares to Agilent's stockholders, or incurred to effect the separation of the semiconductor test solutions business from Agilent to the extent incurred prior to the separation on June 1, 2006. On July 4, 2011, Verigy announced the completion by Advantest Corporation of its acquisition of Verigy. Verigy will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Advantest and our indemnification obligations to Verigy should be unaffected. In connection with the separation of Keysight from Agilent, Keysight assumed the indemnification obligations to Verigy. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
Indemnifications to HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company)
We have given multiple indemnities to HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (formerly Hewlett-Packard Company) (together "HP") in connection with our activities prior to our spin-off from HP for the businesses that constituted Agilent prior to the spin-off. These indemnifications cover a variety of aspects of our business, including, but not limited to, employee, tax, intellectual property and environmental matters. The agreements containing these indemnifications have been previously disclosed as exhibits to our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on August 16, 1999. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
Indemnifications to Varian Medical Systems and Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates
In connection with our acquisition of Varian, we are subject to certain indemnification obligations to Varian Medical Systems (formerly Varian Associates, Inc. ("VAI")) and Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates ("VSEA") in connection with the Instruments business as conducted by VAI prior to the Distribution (as described in Note 1 of Varian's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 25, 2009). These indemnification obligations cover a variety of aspects of our business, including, but not limited to, employee, tax, intellectual property, litigation and environmental matters. Certain of the agreements containing these indemnification obligations are disclosed as exhibits to Varian's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on November 25, 2009. On November 10, 2011, Applied Materials announced that it had completed the acquisition of VSEA, which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Applied Materials; our indemnification obligations to VSEA should be unaffected. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
Indemnifications to Officers and Directors
Our corporate by-laws require that we indemnify our officers and directors, as well as those who act as directors and officers of other entities at our request, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any proceedings arising out of their services to Agilent and such other entities, including service with respect to employee benefit plans. In addition, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each director and each board-appointed officer of Agilent which provide for indemnification of these directors and officers under similar circumstances and under additional circumstances. The indemnification obligations are more fully described in the by-laws and the indemnification agreements. We purchase standard insurance to cover claims or a portion of the claims made against our directors and officers. Since a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated in our by-laws or in our indemnification agreements and will depend on the facts and circumstances that arise out of any future claims, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, we have not made payments related to these obligations, and the fair value for these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
Other Indemnifications
As is customary in our industry and as provided for in local law in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, many of our standard contracts provide remedies to our customers and others with whom we enter into contracts, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of our products. From time to time, we indemnify customers, as well as our suppliers, contractors, lessors, lessees, companies that purchase our businesses or assets and others with whom we enter into contracts, against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various triggering events related to the sale and the use of our products and services, the use of their goods and services, the use of facilities and state of our owned facilities, the state of the assets and businesses that we sell and other matters covered by such contracts, usually up to a specified maximum amount. In addition, from time to time we also provide protection to these parties against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. In our experience, claims made under such indemnifications are rare and the associated estimated fair value of the liability was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
In connection with the sale of several of our businesses, we have agreed to indemnify the buyers of such business, their respective affiliates and other related parties against certain damages that they might incur in the future. The continuing indemnifications primarily cover damages relating to liabilities of the businesses that Agilent retained and did not transfer to the buyers, as well as other specified items. In our opinion, the fair value of these indemnification obligations was not material as of October 31, 20122015.
17.18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Lease Commitments: We lease certain real and personal property from unrelated third parties under non-cancelable operating leases. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at October 31, 20122015 were $51 million for 2013, $46 million for 2014, $33 million for 2015, $2135 million for 2016, $1531 million for 2017, $23 million for 2018, $15 million for 2019, $11 million for 2020 and $1634 million thereafter. Future minimum subleaselease income under leases at October 31, 20122015 was $6 million for 2013, $5 million for 2014, $4 million for 2015, $19 million for 2016, $9 million for 2017, $7 million for 2018, and zero$23 million thereafter. Certain leases require us to pay property taxes, insurance and routine maintenance, and include escalation clauses. Total rent expense including charges relating to the consolidation of excess facilities was $8465 million in 20122015, $8255 million in 20112014 and $8953 million in 20102013.
Contingencies: We are involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including, but not limited to, patent, commercial and environmental matters.matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. There are no matters pending that we currently believe are reasonably possible of having a material impact to our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
18.19. SHORT-TERM DEBT
Credit FacilityFacilities
On October 20, 2011, weSeptember 15, 2014, Agilent entered into a five-year credit agreement with a financial institution which provides for a $400$400 million five-year unsecured credit facility that will expire on October 20, 2016. The company may use amounts borrowedSeptember 15, 2019. On June 9, 2015, the commitments under the existing credit facility were increased by $300 million so that the aggregate commitments under the facility for general corporate purposes.now total $700 million. As of October 31, 20122015, the company hashad no borrowings outstanding under the facility. We were in compliance with the covenants for the credit facilitiesfacility during the year ended October 31, 2012.
As a result of the Dako acquisition, we have a credit facility in Danish Krone equivalent of $9 million with a Danish financial institution. For the yearyears ended October 31, 2012, $1 million was repaid2015 and no borrowings were outstanding under the facility as2014.
of October 31, 2012.
2012 Senior Notes
On September 9, 2009, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $250 million in senior notes ("2012 senior notes"). The 2012 senior notes matured on September 14, 2012 and were fully redeemed.
2013 Senior Notes
In July 2010, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $250 million in senior notes ("2013 senior notes"). The 2013 senior notes were issued at 99.82% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on July 15, 2013, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 2.50% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on January 15th and July 15th of each year, payments commenced on January 15, 2011. The 2013 senior notes are repayable within one year and have been reclassified from long-term debt, see Note 19, "Long-term debt".
All notes issued are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with all of Agilent's other senior unsecured indebtedness. The company incurred issuance costs of $2 million in connection with the 2013 senior notes. These costs were capitalized in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and the costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the senior notes.
19.20. LONG-TERM DEBT
Senior Notes
The following table summarizes the company's long-term senior notes and the related interest rate swaps:
| | | | October 31, 2012 | | October 31, 2011 | October 31, 2015 | | October 31, 2014 |
| | Amortized Principal | | Swap | | Total | | Amortized Principal | | Swap | | Total | Amortized Principal | | Swap | | Total | | Amortized Principal | | Swap | | Total |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| 2013 Senior Notes | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 250 |
| | — |
| | 250 |
| |
| 2015 Senior Notes | 499 |
| | 18 |
| | 517 |
| | 499 |
| | 24 |
| | 523 |
| |
| 2017 Senior Notes | 599 |
| | 26 |
| | 625 |
| | 598 |
| | 31 |
| | 629 |
| 100 |
| | 2 |
| | 102 |
| | 100 |
| | 3 |
| | 103 |
|
| 2020 Senior Notes | 498 |
| | 29 |
| | 527 |
| | 498 |
| | 32 |
| | 530 |
| 499 |
| | 19 |
| | 518 |
| | 499 |
| | 22 |
| | 521 |
|
| 2022 Senior Notes | 399 |
| | — |
| | 399 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 399 |
| | — |
| | 399 |
| | 399 |
| | — |
| | 399 |
|
| 2023 Senior Notes | | 598 |
| | — |
| | 598 |
| | 598 |
| | — |
| | 598 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,995 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 2,068 |
| | $ | 1,845 |
| | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 1,932 |
| $ | 1,596 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 1,617 |
| | $ | 1,596 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 1,621 |
|
2013 Senior Notes
The 2013 senior notes are repayable within one year and have been reclassified to short-term debt, see Note 18, "Short-term debt".
2015 Senior Notes
In September 2009, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $500 million in senior notes ("2015 senior notes"). The senior notes were issued at 99.69% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on September 14, 2015, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on March 14th and September 14th of each year, payments commenced on March 14, 2010.
On June 6, 2011, we terminated our interest rate swap contracts related to our 2015 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination for these contracts was approximately $31 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 2012 was $18 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2015 senior notes.
2017 Senior Notes
In October 2007, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $600 million in senior notes ("2017 senior notes"). The 2017 senior notes were issued at 99.60% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on November 1, 2017, and bear
interest at a fixed rate of 6.50% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on May 1st and November 1st of each year and payments commenced on May 1, 2008.2008.
On November 25, 2008, we terminated two interest rate swap contracts associated with our 2017 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $400 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination was approximately $43 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 20122015 was $262 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2017 senior notes.
On October 20, 2014, we settled the redemption of $500 million of the $600 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of our 2017 senior notes due November 1, 2017 that had been called for redemption on September 19, 2014. The redemption price of approximately $580 million included a $80 million prepayment penalty computed in accordance with the terms of the 2017 senior notes as the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and unpaid interest related to $500 million partial redemption. The prepayment penalty less partial amortization of previously deferred interest rate swap gain of approximately $14 million together with $2 million of amortization of debt issuance costs and discount was disclosed in other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. We also paid accrued and unpaid interest of $15 million on the 2017 senior notes up to but not including the redemption date.
2020 Senior Notes
In July 2010, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $500 million in senior notes ("2020 senior notes"). The 2020 senior notes were issued at 99.54% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on July 15, 2020, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.00% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on January 15th and July 15th of each year, payments commenced on January 15, 2011.2011.
On August 9, 2011, we terminated our interest rate swap contracts related to our 2020 senior notes that represented the notional amount of $500 million. The asset value, including interest receivable, upon termination for these contracts was approximately $34 million and the amount to be amortized at October 31, 20122015 was $2919 million. The gain is being deferred and amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the 2020 senior notes.
2022 Senior Notes
In September 2012, the company issued an aggregate principal amount of $400 million in senior notes ("2022 senior notes"). The 2022 senior notes were issued at 99.80% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on October 1, 2022, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.20% per annum. The interest is payable semi-annually on April 1st and October 1st of each year, payments commencecommenced on April 1, 2013.
2023 Senior Notes
In June 2013, the company issued aggregate principal amount of $600 million in senior notes ("2023 senior notes"). The 2023 senior notes were issued at 99.544% of their principal amount. The notes will mature on April 1, 2013July 15, 2023. and bear interest at a fixed rate of 3.875% per annum. The interest is payable semi annually on January 15th and July 15th of each year and payments will commence January 15, 2014.
All notes issued are unsecured and rank equally in right of payment with all of Agilent's other senior unsecured indebtedness. The company incurred issuance costs of $5 million in connection with the 2017 senior notes and incurred $3 million each in connection with the 2015, 2020 and 2022 senior notes. These costs were capitalized in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet and the costs are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the senior notes.
Other debt
As of October 31, 20122015, and as a result of the Dako acquisition, we have a mortgage debt,debts, secured on buildings in Denmark, in Danish Krone equivalent of $4438 million aggregate principal outstanding with a Danish financial institution. The loan hasloans have a variable interest rate based on 3 months Copenhagen Interbank Rate ("Cibor") and will mature on September 30, 2027.2027. Interest payments are made in March, June, September and December of each year.
20.21. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Stock Repurchase Program
On November 19, 200922, 2013 we announced that our Boardboard of Directors approveddirectors had authorized a share-repurchaseshare repurchase program. The existing program is designed to reduce or eliminate dilution of basic outstanding shares in connection with issuancesresulting from issuance of stock under the company's employee equity incentive plans. The share-repurchase program does not require the companyprograms to acquiretarget maintaining a specific numberweighted average share count of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. There is no fixed termination date for the new share-repurchase program.approximately 335 million diluted shares. For the year ended October 31, 20122015, we repurchased approximately 56 million shares for $172267 million. For the year ended 2011October 31, 2014, we repurchased approximately 124 million shares for $497200 million. For the year ended October 31, 2013 we repurchased 20 million shares for $900 million. All such shares and related costs are held as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method.
On May 28, 2015 we announced that our board of directors had approved a new share repurchase program (the "2015 repurchase program"). The 2015 share repurchase program authorizes the purchase of up to $1.14 billion of our common stock through and including November 1, 2018. The 2015 share repurchase program will commence, at the option of the company, on either November 1, 2015, or the date on which we complete the purchase of the remaining $98 million for a total of $365 million of common stock in fiscal 2015 under the existing stock repurchase program. Upon commencement, the 2015 share repurchase program replaces our existing stock repurchase program, which authorized the repurchase of shares to reduce or eliminate share dilution from equity programs. The 2015 repurchase program does not require the company to acquire a specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
Cash Dividends on Shares of Common Stock
During the fiscal 2012,year ended October 31, 2015, cash dividends of $0.30$0.40 per share, or $104133 million were declared and paid on the company's outstanding common stock. OnDuring the year ended November 16, 2012October 31, 2014, cash dividends of $0.53 per share, or $176 million were declared and paid on the company's outstanding common stock. During the year ended October 31, 2013, cash dividends of $0.46 per share, or $156 million were declared and paid on the company's outstanding common stock. On November 19, 2015, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.10$0.115 per share of common stock, or approximately $35$38 million which will be paid on January 23, 201327, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2012.January 5, 2016. The timing and amounts of any future dividends are subject to determination and approval by our board of directors.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The following table summarizes the components of our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of October 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, net of tax effect:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | (in millions) |
| Unrealized gain on equity securities, net of $(8) of tax for 2011 | $ | — |
| | $ | (6 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation, net of $(102) of tax for 2012 and 2011 | 424 |
| | 452 |
|
| Unrealized losses on defined benefit plans, net of tax of $162 and $84 for 2012 and 2011, respectively | (537 | ) | | (331 | ) |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax of $(3)and $(2) for 2012 and 2011, respectively | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total accumulated other comprehensive income | $ | (111 | ) | | $ | 116 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) |
| Unrealized gain on equity securities, net of $(0) and $(3) of tax expense for 2015 and 2014, respectively | $ | — |
| | $ | 17 |
|
| Foreign currency translation, net of $(2) and $(86) of tax expense for 2015 and 2014, respectively | (189 | ) | | 156 |
|
| Unrealized losses on defined benefit plans, net of tax benefit of $126 and $145 for 2015 and 2014, respectively | (204 | ) | | (516 | ) |
| Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax expense of $(2) and $(7) for 2015 and 2014, respectively | 2 |
| | 9 |
|
| Total accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (391 | ) | | $ | (334 | ) |
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component and related tax effects for the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Net defined benefit pension cost and post retirement plan costs | | | | |
| | | Unrealized gain on investments | | Foreign currency translation | | Prior service credits | | Actuarial Losses | | Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives | | Total |
| | | (in millions) |
| As of October 31, 2013 | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 425 |
| | $ | 287 |
| | $ | (628 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 91 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | | 12 |
| | (277 | ) | | — |
| | (273 | ) | | 13 |
| | (525 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (48 | ) | | 65 |
| | 1 |
| | 17 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax (expense) benefit | | (1 | ) | | 8 |
| | 16 |
| | 65 |
| | (5 | ) | | 83 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | 10 |
| | (269 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (143 | ) | | 9 |
| | (425 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2014 | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 156 |
| | $ | 255 |
| | $ | (771 | ) | | $ | 9 |
| | $ | (334 | ) |
| Transfer to Keysight | | $ | (17 | ) | | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (83 | ) | | $ | 444 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 332 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance after transfer to Keysight | | — |
| | 147 |
| | 172 |
| | (327 | ) | | 6 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | | — |
| | (360 | ) | | — |
| | (90 | ) | | 11 |
| | (439 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income | | — |
| | — |
| | (17 | ) | | 35 |
| | (18 | ) | | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax benefit | | — |
| | 24 |
| | 6 |
| | 17 |
| | 3 |
| | 50 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | (336 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (38 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (389 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2015 | | $ | — |
| | $ | (189 | ) | | $ | 161 |
| | $ | (365 | ) | | $ | 2 |
| | $ | (391 | ) |
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Details about accumulated other |
| Amounts Reclassified | Affected line item in |
| comprehensive income components |
| from other comprehensive income | statement of operations |
|
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unrealized gain on equity securities |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1 |
| | Other income (expense), net |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| Total before income tax |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | Provision for income tax |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
|
| Total net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unrealized gains and (losses) on derivatives |
| 18 |
|
| (1 | ) | | Cost of products |
|
| 18 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| Total before income tax |
|
| (6 | ) |
| — |
| | (Provision)/benefit for income tax |
|
| 12 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| Total net of income tax |
| Net defined benefit pension cost and post retirement plan costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Actuarial net loss |
| (35 | ) |
| (65 | ) |
|
|
| Prior service benefit |
| 17 |
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
|
| (18 | ) |
| (17 | ) |
| Total before income tax |
|
| 5 |
|
| (2 | ) | | (Provision)/benefit for income tax |
|
| (13 | ) |
| (19 | ) |
| Total net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total reclassifications for the period |
| $ | (1 | ) |
| $ | (19 | ) |
|
|
Amounts in parentheses indicate reductions to income and increases to other comprehensive income.
Reclassifications of prior service benefit and actuarial net loss in respect of retirement plans and post retirement pension plans are included in the computation of net periodic cost (see Note 16 "Retirement Plans and Post Retirement Pension Plans").
21.22. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Description of segments. We are a measurement companyglobal leader in life sciences, diagnostics and applied chemical markets, providing core bio-analyticalapplication focused solutions that include instruments, software, services and consumables for the entire laboratory workflow. In the first fiscal quarter of 2015, we completed the separation of our electronic measurement business. See Note 4, "Discontinued Operations" for further information.
In November 2014, we announced a change in organizational structure designed to better serve our customers. Our new structure reflects our strategy to focus our expertise on the market segments we serve and utilize our resources to offer product solutions to theaddress our customer needs. The new operating structure ensures that we are able to respond to market demand while reducing costs through increased efficiencies. As a result, our life sciences business, excluding the nucleic acid solutions division, together with the chemical analysis communicationsbusiness merged to form a new segment called life sciences and electronics,applied markets business. Our diagnostics and genomics industries. Inbusinesses combined and includes the third fiscal quarternucleic acid solutions division of 2012, we formed a new operating segment. The newour life sciences business and became the diagnostics and genomics segment. Finally, the Agilent CrossLab segment was formed from a portion of our pre-existing life sciences business plus the business of our recent acquisition of Dako. services and consumables businesses. The historical financial segment information has been recast to conform to this new presentation.
Following this reorganization, Agilent has fourthree business segments comprised of the life sciences business, the chemical analysisand applied markets business, diagnostics and genomics business and the electronic measurement business.Agilent CrossLab business each of which comprises a reportable segment. The fourthree operating segments were determined based primarily on how the chief operating decision maker views and evaluates
our operations. Operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and to assess its performance. Other factors, including market separation and customer specific applications, go-to-market channels, products and services and manufacturing are considered in determining the formation of these operating segments.
A description of our fourthree reportable segments is as follows:
Our life sciences and applied markets business provides application-focused solutions that include instruments software, consumables, and servicessoftware that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products. Key product categories in life sciences include: liquid chromatography systems, columns and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; laboratory software and informatics systems; laboratory automation and robotic systems; dissolution testing; nucleic acid solutions; nuclear magnetic resonance, magnetic resonance imaging, and x-ray diffraction systems; and services and support for the aforementioned products.
Our chemical analysis business provides application-focused solutions that include instruments, software, consumables, and services that enable customers to identify, quantify and analyze the physical and biological properties of substances and products. Key product categories in chemical analysis include: gas chromatography systems, columns and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry instruments; molecular spectroscopy instruments; software and data systems; vacuum pumps and measurement technologies; services and support for our products.
Our diagnostics and genomics business provides solutions that include reagents, instruments, software and consumables thatproducts, as well as enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the molecular level. WithKey product categories include: liquid chromatography ("LC") systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry ("LCMS") systems; gas chromatography ("GC") systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry ("GCMS") systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ("ICP-MS") instruments; atomic absorption ("AA") instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (“MP-AES”) instruments; inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry ("ICP-OES") instruments; laboratory software and informatics systems; laboratory automation and robotic systems; dissolution testing; vacuum pumps and measurement technologies.
Our diagnostics and genomics business is comprised of three areas of activity providing solutions that include pathology, reagents, instruments, software and consumables, which enable customers in the acquisition of Dako, a new group ofclinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the cellular and molecular level. First, our Pathology solutions have been added that extend ourbusiness is focused on product offerings to cancer diagnostics withand anatomic pathology workflows. OurThe broad portfolio of offerings includeincludes immunohistochemistry in situ hybridization (“IHC”), hematoxylinIn Situ Hybridization (“ISH”), Hematoxylin and eosinEosin (“H&E”) staining and special staining,staining. We also collaborate with a number of major pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also known as companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy. Second, our genomics business includes arrays for DNA mutation detection, genotyping, gene copy number determination, identification of gene rearrangements, DNA methylation profiling, gene expression profiling, as well as automated gel electrophoresis-based sample analysis systems. We also collaborate with a number of major pharmaceutical companies to develop new potential pharmacodiagnostics, also called companion diagnostics, which may be used to identify patients most likely to benefit from a specific targeted therapy.
Our electronic measurementNext Generation Sequencing ("NGS") target enrichment. Finally, our nucleic acid solutions business provides electronic measurement instruments and systems, software design tools and
related services that are used in the design, development, manufacture, installation, deployment and operation of electronics equipment and microscopy products. Related services include start-up assistance, instrument productivity and application services and instrument calibration and repair. We also offer customization, consulting and optimization services throughout the customer's product lifecycle.expertise focused on production of synthesized oligonucleotides under pharmaceutical Good Manufacturing Practices ("GMP") conditions for use as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients ("API") in an emerging class of drugs that utilize nucleic acid molecules for disease therapy.
The historical segment numbers for bothAgilent CrossLab business spans the life sciencesentire lab with its extensive consumables and diagnosticsservices portfolio, which is designed to improve customer outcomes. The majority of the portfolio is vendor neutral, meaning Agilent can serve and genomics segments have been recastsupply customers regardless of their instrument purchase choices. Solutions range from chemistries and supplies to conformservices and software helping to this new reporting structureconnect the entire lab. Key product categories in our financial statements.consumables include GC and LC columns, sample preparation products, custom chemistries, and a large selection of laboratory instrument supplies. Services include startup, operational, training and compliance support, as well as asset management and consultative services that help increase customer productivity. Custom service and consumable bundles are tailored to meet the specific application needs of various industries and to keep instruments fully operational and compliant with the respective industry requirements.
A significant portion of the segments' expenses arise from shared services and infrastructure that we have historically provided to the segments in order to realize economies of scale and to efficiently use resources. These expenses, collectively called corporate charges, include costs of centralized research and development, legal, accounting, real estate, insurance services, information technology services, treasury, and other corporate infrastructure expenses.expenses and costs of centralized research and development. Charges are allocated to the segments, and the allocations have been determined on a basis that we consider to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the segments. Beginning in fiscal year 2012, we created the Agilent Order Fulfillment ("AOF") organizationCorporate charges previously allocated to centralize all order fulfillment and supply organizations and operations. AOF provides resources for manufacturing, engineering, strategic sourcing and logistics to life sciences, chemical analysis andour electronic measurement businesses.business, but not classified within discontinued operations, were not reallocated to our other segments. These charges are presented below as a component of the reconciliation between segments' income from operations and Agilent's income from continuing operations and are classified as unallocated corporate charges. In general, AOF employees are dedicatedaddition, we do not allocate amortization and impairment of acquisition-related intangible assets, restructuring and transformational expenses, acquisition and integration costs and certain other charges to specific businesses and the associated costs are directly allocated to businesses.operating margin for each segment because management does not include this information in its measurement of the performance of the operating segments.
The following tables reflect the results of our reportable segments under our management reporting system. These results are not necessarily in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The performance of each segment is measured based on several metrics, including adjustedsegment income from operations. These results are used, in part, by the chief operating decision maker in evaluating the performance of, and in allocating resources to, each of the segments.
The profitability of each of the segments is measured after excluding restructuring and asset impairment charges, investment gains and losses, interest income, interest expense, acquisition and integration costs, non-cash amortization and other items as noted in the reconciliations below.
| | | | Life Sciences | | Chemical Analysis | | Diagnostics and Genomics | Electronic Measurement | | Total Segments | Life Sciences and Applied Markets | | Diagnostics and Genomics | | Agilent CrossLab | | Total Segments |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Year ended October 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended October 31, 2015: | | | | | | | | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,582 |
| | $ | 1,559 |
| | $ | 402 |
| $ | 3,315 |
| | $ | 6,858 |
| $ | 2,046 |
| | $ | 662 |
| | $ | 1,330 |
| | $ | 4,038 |
|
| Income from operations | $ | 230 |
| | $ | 338 |
| | $ | 65 |
| $ | 751 |
| | $ | 1,384 |
| $ | 380 |
| | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | $ | 767 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 16 |
| $ | 83 |
| | $ | 171 |
| $ | 27 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 98 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 3 |
| $ | 37 |
| | $ | 76 |
| $ | 27 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2011: | | | | | | | | — |
| |
| Total segment revenue | $ | 1,515 |
| | $ | 1,518 |
| | $ | 277 |
| $ | 3,316 |
| | $ | 6,626 |
| |
| Varian acquisition deferred revenue fair value adjustment | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| | $ | (11 | ) | |
| Year ended October 31, 2014: | | | | | | | | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,511 |
| | $ | 1,511 |
| | $ | 277 |
| $ | 3,316 |
| | $ | 6,615 |
| $ | 2,078 |
| | $ | 663 |
| | $ | 1,307 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
|
| Income from operations | $ | 202 |
| | $ | 313 |
| | $ | 35 |
| $ | 760 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| $ | 369 |
| | $ | 93 |
| | $ | 301 |
| | $ | 763 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 15 |
| $ | 75 |
| | $ | 142 |
| $ | 29 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 105 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 4 |
| $ | 36 |
| | $ | 73 |
| $ | 29 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 56 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2010: | | | | | | | | — |
| |
| Total segment revenue | $ | 1,226 |
| | $ | 1,200 |
| | $ | 253 |
| $ | 2,784 |
| | $ | 5,463 |
| |
| Varian acquisition deferred revenue fair value adjustment | $ | (15 | ) | | $ | (4 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | $ | (19 | ) | |
| Year ended October 31, 2013: | | | | | | | | |
| Total net revenue | $ | 1,211 |
| | $ | 1,196 |
| | $ | 253 |
| $ | 2,784 |
| | $ | 5,444 |
| $ | 2,035 |
| | $ | 635 |
| | $ | 1,224 |
| | $ | 3,894 |
|
| Income from operations | $ | 203 |
| | $ | 279 |
| | $ | 18 |
| $ | 438 |
| | $ | 938 |
| $ | 338 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 299 |
| | $ | 732 |
|
| Depreciation expense | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | $ | 12 |
| $ | 66 |
| | $ | 124 |
| $ | 28 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 98 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 4 |
| $ | 34 |
| | $ | 64 |
| $ | 27 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 47 |
|
For the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, depreciation expense and share-based compensation expense exclude unallocated corporate charges.
The following table reconciles reportable segments' income from operations to Agilent's total enterprise income before taxes:
| | | | Years Ended October 31, | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Total reportable segments' income from operations | $ | 1,384 |
| | $ | 1,310 |
| | $ | 938 |
| $ | 767 |
| | $ | 763 |
| | $ | 732 |
|
| Restructuring related costs | — |
| | (2 | ) | | (64 | ) | |
| Restructuring and business exit related costs | | (12 | ) | | (66 | ) | | (34 | ) |
| Acceleration of depreciation for held and used assets | (15 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Asset Impairments | (1 | ) | | (9 | ) | | (19 | ) | (3 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Transformational programs | (25 | ) | | (51 | ) | | (39 | ) | (56 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (19 | ) |
| Amortization of intangibles | (136 | ) | | (113 | ) | | (77 | ) | (156 | ) | | (189 | ) | | (190 | ) |
| Acquisition and integration costs | (74 | ) | | (54 | ) | | (102 | ) | (13 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (22 | ) |
| Varian acquisition related fair value adjustments | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (51 | ) | |
| Acceleration of share-based compensation expense related to workforce reduction | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| One-time and pre-separation costs | | — |
| | (14 | ) | | — |
|
| Other | (14 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (20 | ) | (3 | ) | | 10 |
| | (13 | ) |
| Interest Income | 9 |
| | 14 |
| | 20 |
| 7 |
| | 9 |
| | 7 |
|
| Interest Expense | (101 | ) | | (86 | ) | | (96 | ) | (66 | ) | | (110 | ) | | (107 | ) |
| Gain on sale of network solutions division, net | — |
| | — |
| | 132 |
| |
| Other income (expense), net | 16 |
| | 33 |
| | 70 |
| 17 |
| | (89 | ) | | 7 |
|
| Unallocated corporate charges | | — |
| | (40 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| Income before taxes, as reported | $ | 1,043 |
| | $ | 1,032 |
| | $ | 692 |
| $ | 480 |
| | $ | 229 |
| | $ | 293 |
|
Major customers. No customer represented 10 percent or more of our total net revenue in 20122015, 20112014 or 20102013.
The following table presents assets and capital expenditures directly managed by each segment. Unallocated assets primarily consist of cash, cash equivalents, accumulated amortization of other intangibles the valuation allowance relating to deferred tax assets and other assets.
| | | | Life Sciences | | Chemical Analysis | | Diagnostics and Genomics | Electronic Measurement | | Total Segments | Life Sciences and Applied Markets | | Diagnostics and Genomics | | Agilent CrossLab | | Total Segments |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| As of October 31, 2012: | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2015: | | | | | | | | |
| Assets | $ | 1,477 |
| | $ | 1,768 |
| | $ | 2,595 |
| $ | 2,157 |
| | $ | 7,997 |
| $ | 1,539 |
| | $ | 2,027 |
| | $ | 1,008 |
| | $ | 4,574 |
|
| Capital expenditures | $ | 43 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 13 |
| $ | 106 |
| | $ | 194 |
| $ | 28 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 98 |
|
| As of October 31, 2011: | | | | | | | | | |
| As of October 31, 2014: | | | | | | | | |
| Assets | $ | 1,479 |
| | $ | 1,772 |
| | $ | 358 |
| $ | 2,156 |
| | $ | 5,765 |
| $ | 1,663 |
| | $ | 2,302 |
| | $ | 1,001 |
| | $ | 4,966 |
|
| Capital expenditures | $ | 33 |
| | $ | 23 |
| | $ | 8 |
| $ | 124 |
| | $ | 188 |
| $ | 33 |
| | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 110 |
|
The following table reconciles segment assets to Agilent's total assets:
| | | | October 31, | October 31, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | 2015 | | 2014 |
| | (in millions) | (in millions) |
| Total reportable segments' assets | $ | 7,997 |
| | $ | 5,765 |
| $ | 4,574 |
| | $ | 4,966 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments | 2,351 |
| | 3,527 |
| 2,003 |
| | 2,218 |
|
| Short-term restricted cash and cash equivalents | | 242 |
| | — |
|
| Prepaid expenses | 128 |
| | 107 |
| 105 |
| | 85 |
|
| Investments | 109 |
| | 114 |
| 86 |
| | 96 |
|
| Long-term and other receivables | 161 |
| | 221 |
| 104 |
| | 90 |
|
| Other, including valuation allowance | (210 | ) | | (677 | ) | |
| Other | | 365 |
| | 377 |
|
| Current and non-current assets of discontinued operations | | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,983 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 10,536 |
| | $ | 9,057 |
| $ | 7,479 |
| | $ | 10,815 |
|
The other category primarily represents the difference between how segments report deferred taxes.
The following table represents total revenue by product category:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended October 31, |
| | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
| | (in millions) |
| Instrumentation | $ | 1,827 |
| | $ | 1,839 |
| | $ | 1,802 |
|
| Analytical lab services | 843 |
| | 831 |
| | 768 |
|
| Analytical lab consumables | 489 |
| | 476 |
| | 456 |
|
| Diagnostics and genomics solutions | 662 |
| | 663 |
| | 635 |
|
| Informatics and other | 217 |
| | 239 |
| | 233 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,038 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
| | $ | 3,894 |
|
The following table presents summarized information for net revenue and long-lived assets by geographic region for continuing operations.region. Revenues from external customers are generally attributed to countries based upon the location of the Agilent sales representative. Long lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment, long-term receivables and other long-term assets excluding intangible assets. The rest of the world primarily consists of rest of Asia and Europe.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | China | | Japan | | Rest of the World | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Net revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
| Year ended October 31, 2012 | $ | 2,218 |
| | $ | 1,078 |
| | $ | 716 |
| | $ | 2,846 |
| | $ | 6,858 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2011 | $ | 2,016 |
| | $ | 1,035 |
| | $ | 700 |
| | $ | 2,864 |
| | $ | 6,615 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2010 | $ | 1,760 |
| | $ | 744 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 2,391 |
| | $ | 5,444 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | China | | Rest of the World | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Net revenue: | | | | | | | |
| Year ended October 31, 2015 | $ | 1,206 |
| | $ | 633 |
| | $ | 2,199 |
| | $ | 4,038 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2014 | $ | 1,019 |
| | $ | 543 |
| | $ | 2,486 |
| | $ | 4,048 |
|
| Year ended October 31, 2013 | $ | 1,077 |
| | $ | 619 |
| | $ | 2,198 |
| | $ | 3,894 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | Japan | | Rest of the World | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Long-lived assets: | | | | | | | |
| October 31, 2012 | $ | 550 |
| | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 645 |
| | $ | 1,362 |
|
| October 31, 2011 | $ | 567 |
| | $ | 170 |
| | $ | 551 |
| | $ | 1,288 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | United States | | Rest of the World | | Total |
| | (in millions) |
| Long-lived assets: | | | | | |
| October 31, 2015 | $ | 391 |
| | $ | 379 |
| | $ | 770 |
|
| October 31, 2014 | $ | 379 |
| | $ | 451 |
| | $ | 830 |
|
23. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On November 2, 2015 we completed the acquisition of Seahorse Bioscience ("Seahorse"), a leader in providing instruments and assay kits for measuring cell metabolism and bioenergetics for $242 million in cash. Seahorse's technology enables researchers to better understand cell health, function and signaling, and how the cell may be impacted by the introduction of a specific drug, by providing real-time kinetics to unlock essential cellular bioenergetics data. As of October 31, 2015 $242 million of cash and cash equivalents was held in escrow relating to the Seahorse acquisition and was classified as short-term restricted cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheet. We have not yet finished allocating the purchase price to the net assets acquired. The financial results of Seahorse will be included within Agilent's from the beginning of the first quarter of 2016.
QUARTERLY SUMMARY
(Unaudited)
| | | | Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended |
| | January 31, | | April 30, | | July 31, | | October 31, | January 31, (As Revised) | | April 30, (As Revised) | | July 31, (As Revised) | | October 31, (As Revised) |
| | (in millions, except per share data) | (in millions, except per share data) |
| 2012 | | | | | | | (1) | |
| 2015 | | | | | | | |
|
| Net revenue | $ | 1,635 |
| | $ | 1,733 |
| | $ | 1,723 |
| | $ | 1,767 |
| $ | 1,026 |
| | $ | 963 |
| | $ | 1,014 |
| | $ | 1,035 |
|
| Gross profit | 874 |
| | 918 |
| | 890 |
| | 922 |
| 513 |
| | 480 |
| | 513 |
| | 535 |
|
| Income from operations | 271 |
| | 300 |
| | 270 |
| | 278 |
| 115 |
| | 107 |
| | 144 |
| | 156 |
|
| Income from continuing operations | | 93 |
| | 92 |
| | 113 |
| | 140 |
|
| Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | | (30 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (2 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income | $ | 230 |
| | $ | 255 |
| | $ | 243 |
| | $ | 425 |
| $ | 63 |
| | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 111 |
| | $ | 140 |
|
| Net income per share — Basic: | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 1.22 |
| |
| Net income per share — Diluted: | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.69 |
| | $ | 1.20 |
| |
| Net income per share — basic: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
|
| Loss from discontinued operations | | (0.09 | ) | | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.01 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Net income per share - basic | | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.28 |
| | $ | 0.27 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
|
| Loss from discontinued operations | | (0.09 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income per share — diluted | | $ | 0.19 |
| | $ | 0.26 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 348 |
| | 348 |
| | 348 |
| | 348 |
| 336 |
| | 334 |
| | 332 |
| | 331 |
|
| Diluted | 352 |
| | 354 |
| | 353 |
| | 353 |
| 338 |
| | 337 |
| | 334 |
| | 333 |
|
| Cash dividends per common share | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| $ | 0.100 |
| | $ | 0.100 |
| | $ | 0.100 |
| | $ | 0.100 |
|
| Range of stock prices on NYSE | $ 32.51-44.85 |
| | $ 39.15-46.28 |
| | $ 35.32-43.27 |
| | $ 35.38-40.97 |
| $ 37.68-42.99 |
| | $ 37.71-43.59 |
| | $ 38.48-42.93 |
| | $ 33.12-41.35 |
|
| 2011 | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | | | | | | | |
| Net revenue | $ | 1,519 |
| | $ | 1,677 |
| | $ | 1,691 |
| | $ | 1,728 |
| $ | 1,008 |
| | $ | 988 |
| | $ | 1,009 |
| | $ | 1,043 |
|
| Gross profit | 816 |
| | 900 |
| | 892 |
| | 921 |
| 510 |
| | 485 |
| | 502 |
| | 479 |
|
| Income from operations | 211 |
| | 266 |
| | 281 |
| | 313 |
| 124 |
| | 94 |
| | 131 |
| | 70 |
|
| Income from continuing operations | | 123 |
| | 53 |
| | 54 |
| | 2 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | | 75 |
| | 100 |
| | 85 |
| | 57 |
|
| Net income | $ | 193 |
| | $ | 200 |
| | $ | 330 |
| | $ | 289 |
| $ | 198 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 139 |
| | $ | 59 |
|
| Net income per share — Basic: | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
| | $ | 0.95 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| |
| Net income per share — Diluted: | $ | 0.54 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.92 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
| |
| Net income per share — basic: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations | | 0.22 |
| | 0.30 |
| | 0.26 |
| | 0.17 |
|
| Net income per share - basic | | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.18 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted: | | | | | | | | |
| Income from continuing operations | | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
| | $ | 0.01 |
|
| Income from discontinued operations | | 0.23 |
| | 0.29 |
| | 0.25 |
| | 0.16 |
|
| Net income per share — diluted | | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.45 |
| | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.17 |
|
| Weighted average shares used in computing net income per share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 347 |
| | 347 |
| | 348 |
| | 347 |
| 333 |
| | 333 |
| | 334 |
| | 334 |
|
| Diluted | 355 |
| | 355 |
| | 357 |
| | 351 |
| 338 |
| | 337 |
| | 338 |
| | 338 |
|
| Cash dividends per common share | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 0.132 |
| | $ | 0.132 |
| | $ | 0.132 |
| | $ | 0.132 |
|
| Range of stock prices on NYSE | $ 34.38-44.45 |
| | $ 39.94-50.68 |
| | $ 41.29-55.33 |
| | $ 28.67-42.78 |
| $ 49.84-61.22 |
| | $ 51.96-60.46 |
| | $ 53.66-59.58 |
| | $ 49.80-59.40 |
|
| (1) Consolidated financial data includes Dako, acquired on June 21, 2012, and non-recurring tax benefit relating to the U.S. valuation allowance reversal. | |
The above quarterly financial data includes Keysight which is presented as discontinued operations. See Note 4, "Discontinued Operations" for additional information. In addition, we made adjustments to correct immaterial misstatements within our quarterly financial statements. For a detailed explanation of these adjustments, please refer to Note 2, "Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements."
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of October 31, 2012,2015, pursuant to and as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of October 31, 2012,2015, the company's disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, were not effective and designeddue to ensure that (i) information required to be discloseda material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Notwithstanding the company's reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated toidentified material weakness, management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, believes the Chief Executive Officerconsolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K fairly represent in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.cash flows at and for the periods presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management's assessmentCommission ("COSO"). As a result of that evaluation, management concluded that a material weakness exists as described below. A material weakness is “a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the effectivenessregistrant’s annual or interim financial statement will not be prevented or detected in a timely basis.”
During the year ended October 31, 2015, management identified certain errors in the tax accounts, primarily related to prior years, and as a result, concluded that the Company did not design and maintain effective controls over the accounting for income taxes. Specifically, certain controls activities over the completeness and accuracy of our accounting for (i) U.S. taxes on foreign earnings, (ii) international provision for income taxes and (iii) reconciliation of income taxes payable were not performed on a timely basis or at the appropriate level of precision. The errors identified by management during the year ended October 31, 2015, when combined with errors identified in prior years, resulted in the Company revising its consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, for the years ended October 31, 2014 and 2013, and for each of the Company'squarters of the years ended October 31, 2015 and 2014. These control deficiencies in the accounting for income taxes could result in a material misstatement that would not be prevented or detected.
Because of the material weakness, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2012 excluded Dako A/S (“Dako”), which was acquired2015 based on criteria in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Company in a purchase business combination during June 2012. Dako is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company whose total assets and total net revenue represent less than 3 percent and less than 2 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended October 31, 2012. Companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control over financial reporting during the first year of an acquisition while integrating the acquired company under guidelines established by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on the results of this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2012.COSO.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 20122015 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Agilent's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Material Weakness Remediation Efforts
Management has and will continue to enhance its controls which include refinements and enhancements to the design (including the review and supervision and the level of precision) of certain controls over the accounting for income taxes. Enhancements previously made to certain controls contributed to the identification of the errors which impacted prior periods. The Company’s enhanced controls however had an insufficient period of time to operate for management to conclude that they were operating effectively. As such, at October 31, 2015 there continues to be a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement related to the accounting for income taxes may still not be prevented or detected. With the effective operation of these enhanced controls, the Company expects remediation of the material weakness in fiscal 2016.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information regarding our directors appears under “Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”), to be held March 20, 2013.16, 2016. That portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this report. Information regarding our executive officers appears in Item 1 of this report under “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” Information regarding our Audit and Finance Committee and our Audit and Finance Committee's financial expert appears under “Audit and Finance Committee Report” and “Board Structure and Compensation” in our Proxy Statement. That portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this report.
There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors. Information regarding our code of ethics (the company's Standards of Business Conduct) applicable to our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our controller and other senior financial officers appears in Item 1 of this report under “Investor Information.” We will post amendments to or waivers from a provision of the Standards of Business Conduct with respect to those persons on our website at www.investor.agilent.com.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Information about compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act appears under “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement. That portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this report.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information about compensation of our named executive officers appears under “Executive Compensation”, “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement. Information about compensation of our directors appears under “Director Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report” and “Stock Ownership Guidelines” in the Proxy Statement. Those portions of the Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference into this report.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information about security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management appears under "Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement. That portion of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this report.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of October 31, 20122015. All outstanding awards relate to our common stock.
| | | Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) |
| | (a) | | (b) | | (c) | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)(2)(3) | 15,597,796 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | 52,317,690 |
| 8,129,449 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | 56,129,814 |
|
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | 15,597,796 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | 52,317,690 |
| 8,129,449 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | 56,129,814 |
|
| |
| (1) | The number of securities remaining available for future issuance in column (c) includes 35,605,22942,605,407 shares of common stock authorized and available for issuance under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("423(b) Plan"). The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 423(b) Plan is subject to an automatic annual increase of the lesser of one percent of the outstanding common stock of Agilent or an amount determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of the 423(b) Plan, in no event shall the aggregate number of shares issued under the Plan exceed 75 million shares. |
Plan"). The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 423(b) Plan is subject to an automatic annual increase of the lesser of one percent of the outstanding common stock of Agilent or an amount determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of the 423(b) Plan, in no event shall the aggregate number of shares issued under the Plan exceed 75 million shares. The number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights in column (a) does not include shares of common stock issued to participants in consideration of the aggregate participant contributions under the 423(b) Plan totaling $24 million as of October 31, 2012.
| |
| (2) | We issue securities under our equity compensation plans in forms other than options, warrants or rights. On November 19, 2008 and March 11, 2009, the Board and the stockholders, respectively, approved the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan ("2009 Plan") to replace the company's 1999 Plan and 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan for awards of stock-based incentive compensation to our employees (including officers), directors and consultants. The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units with performance-based conditions to vesting or exercisability, and cash awards. The 2009 Plan has a term of ten years. |
| |
| (3) | We issue securities under our equity compensation plans in forms which do not require a payment by the recipient to us at the time of exercise or vesting, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units. Accordingly, the weighted-average exercise price in column (b) does not take these awards into account. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information about certain relationships and related transactions appears under "Related Person Transaction Policy and Procedures" in the Proxy Statement. Information about director independence appears under the heading "Board Structure and Compensation — Director Independence" in the Proxy Statement. Each of those portions of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this report.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information about principal accountant fees and services as well as related pre-approval policies appears under "Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers" and "Policy on Audit and Finance Committee Preapproval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Auditors" in the Proxy Statement. Those portions of the Proxy Statement are incorporated by reference into this report.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
| |
| (a) | The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 on Page 5451 of this report.
| |
| 2. | Financial Statement Schedule. |
The following additional financial statement schedule should be considered in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. All other schedules have been omitted because the required information is either not applicable or not sufficiently material to require submission of the schedule:
SCHEDULE II
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
| | | Column A | | Column B | | Column C | | Column D | | Column E | | Column B | | Column C | | Column D | | Column E |
| Description | | Balance at
Beginning
of Period | | Additions Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts* | | Deductions Credited to Expenses or Other Accounts** | | Balance at
End of
Period | | Balance at
Beginning
of Period | | Additions Charged to
Expenses or
Other Accounts* | | Deductions Credited to Expenses or Other Accounts** | | Balance at
End of
Period |
| | | (in millions) | | (in millions) |
| 2012 | | | | | | | | | |
| 2015 | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax valuation allowance | | $ | 369 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | (280 | ) | | $ | 93 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 131 |
|
| 2011 | | | | | | | | | |
| 2014 | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax valuation allowance | | $ | 527 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | (161 | ) | | $ | 369 |
| | $ | 131 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 134 |
|
| 2010 | | | | | | | | | |
| 2013 | | | | | | | | | |
| Tax valuation allowance | | $ | 684 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (157 | ) | | $ | 527 |
| | $ | 139 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 131 |
|
* Additions include current year additions charged to expenses and current year build due to increases in net deferred tax assets, return to provision true-ups, other adjustments and OCI impact to deferred taxes.
** Deductions include current year releases credited to expenses and current year reductions due to decreases in net deferred tax assets, return to provision true-ups, other adjustments and OCI impact to deferred taxes. For 2012, the amount reflects the reversal of the valuation allowance for most of our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets since management concluded that it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will be realized primarily due to the emergence from cumulative losses in recent years, the return to sustainable U.S. operating profits and the expectation of sustainable profitability in future periods.
Exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed with this report as indicated below (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
| | | | | | Incorporation by Reference | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 2.1 |
| | Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc., effective as of August 12, 1999. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.1 | |
| | Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc., effective as of August 12, 1999. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.1 | |
| 2.2 |
| | General Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.2 | |
| | General Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.2 | |
| 2.3 |
| | Master Technology Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.3 | |
| | Master Technology Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.3 | |
| 2.4 |
| | Master Patent Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.4 | |
| | Master Patent Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.4 | |
| 2.5 |
| | Master Trademark Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.5 | |
| | Master Trademark Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.5 | |
| 2.6 |
| | ICBD Technology Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.6 | |
| | ICBD Technology Ownership and License Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.6 | |
| 2.7 |
| | Employee Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.7 | |
| | Employee Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.7 | |
| 2.8 |
| | Tax Sharing Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.8 | |
| | Tax Sharing Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.8 | |
| 2.9 |
| | Master IT Service Level Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.9 | |
| | Master IT Service Level Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.9 | |
| 2.10 |
| | Real Estate Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.10 | |
| | Real Estate Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.10 | |
| 2.11 |
| | Environmental Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.11 | |
| | Environmental Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.11 | |
| 2.12 |
| | Master Confidential Disclosure Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.12 | |
| | Master Confidential Disclosure Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.12 | |
| 2.13 |
| | Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.13 | |
| | Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement between Hewlett‑Packard and Agilent Technologies, Inc. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.13 | |
| 2.14 |
| | Non U.S. Plan. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.14 | |
| | Non U.S. Plan. | | S-1/A | | 11/10/1999 | | 2.14 | |
| 2.15 |
| | Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2005, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Agilent LED International, Philips Lumileds Holding B.V. and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | | 8-K | | 8/15/2005 | | 2.2 | |
| | Share Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2005, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Agilent LED International, Philips Lumileds Holding B.V. and Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | | 8-K | | 8/15/2005 | | 2.2 | |
| 2.16 |
| | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 26, 2009, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Cobalt Acquisition Corp. and Varian, Inc. | | 10-Q | | 9/4/2009 | | 2.1 | |
| | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 26, 2009, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Cobalt Acquisition Corp. and Varian, Inc. | | 10-Q | | 9/4/2009 | | 2.1 | |
| 2.17 |
| | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 10, 2010, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and JDS Uniphase Corporation (pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, schedules to the Asset Purchase Agreement have been omitted; they will be supplementally provided to the SEC upon request) | | 10-Q | | 3/10/2010 | | 2.1 | |
| | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 10, 2010, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and JDS Uniphase Corporation (pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, schedules to the Asset Purchase Agreement have been omitted; they will be supplementally provided to the SEC upon request) | | 10-Q | | 3/10/2010 | | 2.1 | |
| 2.18 | |
| | Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc. (pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, schedules to the Separation and Distribution Agreement have been omitted; they will be supplementally provided to the SEC upon request)
| | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 2.1 | |
| 3.1 |
| | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | | S-1 | | 8/16/1999 | | 3.1 | |
| | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. | | S-1 | | 8/16/1999 | | 3.1 | |
| 3.2 |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | | 8-K | | 11/20/2012 | | 3.1 | |
| | Amended and Restated Bylaws. | | 8-K | | 11/20/2012 | | 3.1 | |
| 4.1 |
| | Preferred Stock Rights Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Harris Trust and Savings Bank dated as of May 12, 2000. | | 8-A12B/A | | 5/24/2000 | | 1 | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Incorporation by Reference | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 4.2 |
| | Registration Rights Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. dated November 27, 2001. | | 8-K | | 11/27/2001 | | 99.3 | |
| | Registration Rights Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. dated November 27, 2001. | | 8-K | | 11/27/2001 | | 99.3 | |
| 4.3 |
| | Indenture, dated October 24, 2007, between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and the trustee for the debt securities. | | S-3ASR | | 10/24/2007 | | 4.01 | |
| | Indenture, dated October 24, 2007, between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and the trustee for the debt securities. | | S-3ASR | | 10/24/2007 | | 4.01 | |
| 4.4 |
| | Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 29, 2007, between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for Agilent Technologies, Inc. 6.50% Senior Notes due 2017. | | 8-K | | 10/26/2007 | | 4.01 | |
| | Form of First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 29, 2007, between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for Agilent Technologies, Inc. 6.50% Senior Notes due 2017. | | 8-K | | 10/26/2007 | | 4.01 | |
| 4.5 |
| | Form of Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2009, between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for Agilent Technologies, Inc. 4.45% Senior Notes due 2012. | | 8-K | | 9/14/2009 | | 4.01 | |
| | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for the Company's 5.00% Senior Notes due 2020. | | 8-K | | 7/20/2010 | | 4.02 | |
| 4.6 |
| | Form of Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 14, 2009, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for Agilent Technologies, Inc. 5.50% Senior Notes due 2015. | | 8-K | | 9/14/2009 | | 4.02 | |
| | Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2012, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 4.01 | |
| 4.7 |
| | Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for the Company's 2.50% Senior Notes due 2013. | | 8-K | | 7/20/2010 | | 4.01 | |
| | Form of Global Note for the Company's 3.20% Senior Notes due 2022 (contained in Exhibit 4.01) | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 4.02 | |
| 4.8 |
| | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 20, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for the Company's 5.00% Senior Notes due 2020. | | 8-K | | 7/20/2010 | | 4.02 | |
| | Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 21, 2013, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association and Form of Global Note for the Company’s 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023. | | 8-K | | 6/21/2013 | | 4.01 | |
| 4.9 |
| | Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2012, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 4.01 | |
| | Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, between Keysight Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
| | 8-K | | 10/15/2014 | | 4.1 | |
| 4.10 |
| | Form of Global Note for the Company's 3.20% Senior Notes due 2022 (contained in Exhibit 4.01) | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 4.02 | |
| | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 15, 2014, to the Indenture dated as of October 15, 2014, between Keysight Technologies, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee.
| | 8-K | | 10/15/2014 | | 4.2 | |
| 4.11 | |
| | Guarantee, dated as of October 15, 2014, by Agilent Technologies, Inc. in favor of U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for the Holders of Notes specified therein of Keysight Technologies, Inc.
| | 8-K | | 10/15/2014 | | 4.3 | |
| 4.12 | |
| | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2014, by and among Keysight Technologies, Inc., Agilent Technologies, Inc., and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated as representatives of the Initial Purchasers.
| | 8-K | | 10/15/2014 | | 4.4 | |
| 10.1 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan (Amendment and Restatement Effective November 14, 2006).* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2006 | | 10.8 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan (Amendment and Restatement Effective November 14, 2006).* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2006 | | 10.8 | |
| 10.2 |
| | Form of Award Agreement (U.S.) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.1 | |
| | Form of Award Agreement (U.S.) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.1 | |
| 10.3 |
| | Form of Award Agreement (Non-U.S.) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.2 | |
| | Form of Award Agreement (Non-U.S.) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.2 | |
| 10.4 |
| | Form of Award Agreement (SAR) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2004 | | 10.37 | |
| | Form of Award Agreement (SAR) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2004 | | 10.37 | |
| 10.5 |
| | Form of Award Agreement (restricted stock) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2004 | | 10.39 | |
| | Form of Award Agreement (restricted stock) for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2004 | | 10.39 | |
| 10.6 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan Stock Award Agreement For Standard Awards Granted to Employees.* | | 10-Q | | 6/5/2007 | | 10.3 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan Stock Award Agreement For Standard Awards Granted to Employees.* | | 10-Q | | 6/5/2007 | | 10.3 | |
| 10.7 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan Stock Award Agreement Under The Long-Term Performance Program.* | | 10-Q | | 6/5/2007 | | 10.7 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan Stock Award Agreement Under The Long-Term Performance Program.* | | 10-Q | | 6/5/2007 | | 10.7 | |
| 10.8 |
| | Form of Amendment to the Form of Standard Long-Term Performance Program Award Agreement for awards granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Stock Plan during FY07-09 and FY 08-10.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.22 | | |
| 10.9 |
| | Form of Standard Long-Term Performance Program Award Agreement for awards granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.23 | | |
| | | |
| | | | | | Incorporation by Reference | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 10.8 | |
| | Form of Amendment to the Form of Standard Long-Term Performance Program Award Agreement for awards granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. Stock Plan during FY07-09 and FY 08-10.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.22 | |
| 10.9 | |
| | Form of Standard Long-Term Performance Program Award Agreement for awards granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.23 | |
| 10.10 |
| | Form of Standard Stock Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.24 | |
| | Form of Standard Stock Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units granted under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.24 | |
| 10.11 |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for awards granted to New Executives under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.25 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for awards granted to New Executives under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.25 | |
| 10.12 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated, effective November 1, 2008).* | | 10-Q | | 9/5/2008 | | 10.1 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated, effective November 1, 2008).* | | 10-Q | | 9/5/2008 | | 10.1 | |
| 10.13 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (Amended and Restated Effective November 14, 2007).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2007 | | 10.23 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (Amended and Restated Effective November 14, 2007).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2007 | | 10.23 | |
| 10.14 |
| | Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.3 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Agreement for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 11/12/2004 | | 10.3 | |
| 10.15 |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.* | | 10-Q | | 9/5/2008 | | 10.2 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for grants under the Agilent Technologies, Inc. 1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.* | | 10-Q | | 9/5/2008 | | 10.2 | |
| 10.16 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan.* | | DEF14A | | 1/27/2009 | | Appendix A | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan.* | | DEF14A | | 1/27/2009 | | Appendix A | |
| 10.17 |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for U.S. Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.17 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for U.S. Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.17 | |
| 10.18 |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for U.S. Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.31 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for U.S. Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.31 | |
| 10.19 |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for non-U.S. Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.19 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for non-U.S. Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.19 | |
| 10.20 |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for non-U.S. Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.32 | |
| | Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for non-U.S. Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.32 | |
| 10.21 |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for Standard Awards granted to Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.21 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for Standard Awards granted to Employees (for awards made after October 31, 2010).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.21 | |
| 10.22 |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for Standard Awards granted to Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.33 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement for Standard Awards granted to Employees.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.33 | |
| 10.23 |
| | Form of New Executive Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 3/25/2009 | | 10.4 | |
| | Form of New Executive Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 3/25/2009 | | 10.4 | |
| 10.24 |
| | Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 3/25/2009 | | 10.5 | |
| | Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 8-K | | 3/25/2009 | | 10.5 | |
| 10.25 |
| | Form of Long-Term Performance Program Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.36 | |
| | Form of Long-Term Performance Program Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.36 | |
| 10.26 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2007 | | 10.25 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for Standard Awards granted to Employees (for awards made after November 17, 2015).*
| | X |
| 10.27 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Long-Term Performance Program (Amended and Restated through November 1, 2005).* | | 10-Q | | 3/9/2006 | | 10.63 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for Standard Awards granted to Officers (for awards made after November 17, 2015). *
| | X |
| 10.28 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Amended and Restated Effective November 18, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.39 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for Long-Term Performance Program Awards (for awards made after November 17, 2015). *
| | X |
| 10.29 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2011).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.29 | | |
| 10.30 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective October 28, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.40 | | |
| 10.31 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2010 Performance‑Based Compensation Plan for Covered Employees. | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.31 | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | Incorporation by Reference | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith | Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 10.29 | |
| | Form of Stock Award Agreement under the 2009 Stock Plan for New Executives (for awards made after November 17, 2015). *
| | X |
| 10.30 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Benefit Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2005).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2007 | | 10.25 | |
| 10.31 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Long-Term Performance Program (Amended and Restated through November 1, 2005).* | | 10-Q | | 3/9/2006 | | 10.63 | |
| 10.32 |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Performance‑Based Compensation Plan for Covered Employees (Amended and Restated December 18, 2008).* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.34 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Amended and Restated Effective November 18, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.39 | |
| 10.33 |
| | Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by Agilent Technologies, Inc. with each of its directors and board‑appointed officers.* | | S-1 | | 8/16/1999 | | 10.9 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2011).* | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.29 | |
| 10.34 |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Directors of the Company, Section 16 Officers and Board‑elected Officers of the Company.* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.1 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Effective October 28, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.40 | |
| 10.35 |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and the Chief Executive Officer.* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.2 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2010 Performance‑Based Compensation Plan for Covered Employees. | | 10‑K | | 12/20/2010 | | 10.31 | |
| 10.36 |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Section 16 Officers (other than the Company's Chief Executive Officer).* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.3 | |
| | Agilent Technologies, Inc. Performance‑Based Compensation Plan for Covered Employees (Amended and Restated December 18, 2008).* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2008 | | 10.34 | |
| 10.37 |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and specified executives of the Company.* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.4 | |
| | Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by Agilent Technologies, Inc. with each of its directors and board‑appointed officers.* | | S-1 | | 8/16/1999 | | 10.9 | |
| 10.38 |
| | Form of New Section 16 Officer Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Section 16 Officers (other than the Company's Chief Executive Officer) (for executives hired, elected or promoted after July 14, 2009).* | | 8-K | | 9/28/2009 | | 10.1 | |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Directors of the Company, Section 16 Officers and Board‑elected Officers of the Company.* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.1 | |
| 10.39 |
| | Form of New Executive Officer Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and specified executives of the Company (for executives hired, elected or promoted after July 14, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.50 | |
| | Form of Tier I Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and the Chief Executive Officer*
| | 10-K | | 12/22/2014 | | 10.35 | |
| 10.40 |
| | Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and certain other executive officers.* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2007 | | 10.79 | |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Section 16 Officers (other than the Company's Chief Executive Officer).* | | 8-K | | 4/10/2008 | | 10.3 | |
| 10.41 |
| | Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of May 31, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.66 | |
| | Form of Tier II Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Section 16 Officers (other than the Company’s Chief Executive Offier)*
| | 10-K | | 12/22/2014 | | 10.37 | |
| 10.42 |
| | General Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.67 | |
| | Form of New Executive Officer Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and specified executives of the Company (for executives hired, elected or promoted after July 14, 2009).* | | 10-K | | 12/21/2009 | | 10.50 | |
| 10.43 |
| | Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc., Verigy Ltd., and Verigy (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.68 | |
| | Form of Tier III Change of Control Severance Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and specified executives of the Company*
| | 10-K | | 12/22/2014 | | 10.39 | |
| 10.44 |
| | Tax Sharing Agreement by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.70 | |
| | Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of May 31, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.66 | |
| 10.45 |
| | Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated October 20, 2011, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administration Agent and J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, as London Agent. | | 8-K | | 10/25/2011 | | 10.1 | |
| | General Assignment and Assumption Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.67 | |
| 10.46 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated October 24, 2007, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 10/26/2007 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.47 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 9, 2009, by and among the Company, Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 9/14/2009 | | 1.01 | | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 10.48 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated July 13, 2010, by and among the Company, Banc of America Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 7/19/2010 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.49 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 10, 2012, by and among the Company, Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.5 |
| | Share Purchase Agreement by and among Delphi S.a.r.l., Agilent Technologies Europe B.V. and Agilent Technologies, Inc., dated May 16, 2012. | | 8-K | | 5/22/2012 | | 10.1 | | |
| 11.1 |
| | See Note 6, “Net Income Per Share”, to our Consolidated Financial Statements on page 80. | | | | | | | | X |
| 12.1 |
| | Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges. | | | | | | | | X |
| 14.1 |
| | See Investor Information in Item 1: Business on page 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | | | | X |
| 21.1 |
| | Significant subsidiaries of Agilent Technologies, Inc. as of October 31, 2012. | | | | | | | | X |
| 23.1 |
| | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | | | | | | | | X |
| 24.1 |
| | Powers of Attorney. Contained in the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.1 |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 |
| | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 32.1 |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 32.2 |
| | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.INS |
| | XBRL Instance Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.SCH |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.CAL |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.LAB |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.PRE |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.DEF |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit Number | | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit Number | | Filed Herewith |
| 10.46 |
| | Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between Agilent Technologies, Inc., Verigy Ltd., and Verigy (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.68 | | |
| 10.47 |
| | Tax Sharing Agreement by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Verigy Ltd., dated as of June 1, 2006. | | 10-Q | | 6/6/2006 | | 10.7 | | |
| 10.48 |
| | Tax Matters Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
| | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.49 |
| | Employee Matters Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
| | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.50 |
| | Intellectual Property Matters Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
| | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 10.3 | | |
| 10.51 |
| | Trademark License Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc.
| | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 10.4 | | |
| 10.52 |
| | Real Estate Matters Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and between Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Keysight Technologies, Inc. | | 8-K | | 8/1/2014 | | 10.5 | | |
| 10.53 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated October 24, 2007, by and among Agilent Technologies, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 10/26/2007 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.54 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 9, 2009, by and among the Company, Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 9/14/2009 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.55 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated July 13, 2010, by and among the Company, Banc of America Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 7/19/2010 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.56 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated September 10, 2012, by and among the Company, Barclays Capital Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein | | 8-K | | 9/13/2012 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.57 |
| | Underwriting Agreement, dated June 21, 2013, by and among the Company, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, on behalf of the several underwriters named therein. | | 8-K | | 6/21/2013 | | 1.01 | | |
| 10.58 |
| | Credit Agreement, dated September 15, 2014, by and among the Company, the Lenders party thereto and BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent.
| | 8-K | | 9/15/2014 | | 10.2 | | |
| 10.59 |
| | Letter Agreement dated as of June 9, 2015 by and among the Company, BNP Paribas, as Administrative Agent under the Credit Agreement and certain banks | | 8-K | | 6/10/2015 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.60 |
| | Credit Agreement, dated September 15, 2014, by and among the Company, Keysight Technologies, Inc., as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.
| | 8-K | | 9/15/2014 | | 10.1 | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit
Number |
| | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit
Number | | Filed
Herewith |
| 10.61 |
| | Share Purchase Agreement by and among Delphi S.a.r.l., Agilent Technologies Europe B.V. and Agilent Technologies, Inc., dated May 16, 2012. | | 8-K | | 5/22/2012 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.62 |
| | Separation Agreement and General Release, effective as of November 7, 2013 by and between Nicolas Roelofs and the Company. | | 8-K | | 11/13/2013 | | 10.1 | | |
| 10.63 |
| | Executive Service Contract - Chief Executive Officer, by and among Dako Denmark A/S, Dako A/S and Lars Holmkvist*+ | | 10-K | | 12/19/2013 | | 10.53 | | |
| 10.64 |
| | Bonus Retention Agreement by and between the Company and Lars Holmkvist* | | 10-K | | 12/19/2013 | | 10.54 | | |
| 10.65 |
| | Settlement Agreement by and between the Company and Lars Holmkvist*
| | 10-K | | 12/22/2015 | | 10.6 | | |
| 10.66 |
| | Contract of Employment - Corporate Vice President, by and among Dako Denmark A/S and Jacob Thaysen* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2015 | | 10.61 | | |
| 10.67 |
| | Letter of Terms and Conditions International Long Term Assignment, by and among Jacob Thaysen and the Company* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2015 | | 10.62 | | |
| 10.68 |
| | Bonus Retention Agreement, by and among Jacob Thaysen and the Company* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2015 | | 10.63 | | |
| 10.69 |
| | Bonus Retention Notification for FY 13 and FY13-FY15 Performance Periods, by and among Jacob Thaysen and the Company* | | 10-K | | 12/22/2015 | | 10.64 | | |
| 10.70 |
| | Letter of Terms and Conditions Localization Program by and among Jacob Thaysen and the Company *
| | | | | | | | X |
| 10.71 |
| | Letter of Terms and Conditions Localization Program by and among Patrick Kaltenbach and the Company *
| | | | | | | | X |
| 11.1 |
| | See Note 7, “Net Income Per Share”, to our Consolidated Financial Statements on page 80. | | | | | | | | X |
| 12.1 |
| | Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges. | | | | | | | | X |
| 14.1 |
| | See Investor Information in Item 1: Business on page 3 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | | | | X |
| 21.1 |
| | Significant subsidiaries of Agilent Technologies, Inc. as of October 31, 2014. | | | | | | | | X |
| 23.1 |
| | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | | | | | | | | X |
| 24.1 |
| | Powers of Attorney. Contained in the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.1 |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 31.2 |
| | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 32.1 |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 32.2 |
| | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.INS |
| | XBRL Instance Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.SCH |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.CAL |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.LAB |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Incorporation by Reference |
Exhibit
Number |
| | Description | | Form | | Date | | Exhibit
Number | | Filed
Herewith |
| 101.PRE |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| 101.DEF |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | | | | | | | | X |
| |
| * | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
+ Pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, confidential portions of this Exhibit have been redacted and have been
filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | |
| | | AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| | | | | |
| | | BY | | /s/ MARIE OH HUBERMICHAEL TANG |
| | | | | Marie Oh HuberMichael Tang |
| | | | | Senior Vice President, |
| | | | | Assistant General Counsel and Secretary |
Date: December 20, 201218, 2015
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Marie Oh HuberMichael Tang and Stephen D. Williams,P. Diana Chiu, or either of them, his or her attorneys-in-fact, for such person in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that eitherany of said attorneys-in-fact, or substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | |
| Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | | |
/s/ WILLIAM P. SULLIVANMICHAEL R. MCMULLEN | | Director and Chief Executive Officer | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
William P. SullivanMichael R. McMullen | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ DIDIER HIRSCH | | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Didier Hirsch | | (Principal Financial Officer) | | |
| | | | | |
/s/ SOLANGE GLAIZERODNEY GONSALVES | | Vice President, Corporate Controllership | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
Solange GlaizeRodney Gonsalves | | (Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ JAMES G. CULLEN |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| James G. Cullen |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| /s/ PAUL N. CLARK | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Paul N. Clark | | | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ HEIDI FIELDS | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Heidi Fields | | | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ ROBERT J. HERBOLD | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Robert J. Herbold | | | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ KOH BOON HWEE | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Koh Boon Hwee | | | | |
| | | | | |
/s/ DAVID M. LAWRENCE,DANIEL K. PODOLSKY, M.D. | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
David M. Lawrence,Daniel K. Podolsky, M.D. | | | | |
| | | | | |
/s/ A. BARRY RANDSUE H. RATAJ | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Sue H. Rataj | | | | |
| | | | |
/s/ GEORGE A. Barry RandSCANGOS, Ph D | | Director | | December 18, 2015 |
| George A. Scangos, Ph D. | | | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ TADATAKA YAMADA, M.D. | | Director | | December 20, 201218, 2015 |
| Tadataka Yamada, M.D. | | | | |