Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Pages 14 through 33, 47 through 70 and 86 through 88 of the Registrant’s prospectus dated May 10, 1989, as supplemented by Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2 dated July 25, 1989 and September 18, 1989, respectively, filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933, and filed as Exhibits hereto, are incorporated by reference into Part I of this Annual Report.

American Tax Credit Properties II L.P. (the "Registrant"), a Delaware limited partnership, was formed on October 26, 1988 to invest primarily in leveraged low-income multifamily residential complexes (the "Property" or "Properties") that qualified for the low-income housing tax credit (the "Low-income Housing Tax Credit") in accordance with Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”), through the acquisition of limited partner equity interests (the “Local Partnership Interests”) in partnerships (the "Local Partnership" or "Local Partnerships") that are the owners of the Properties. The Local Partnerships hold their respective Properties in fee. Registrant initially invested in fifty such Local Partnerships, including one whose Property also qualified for the historic rehabilitation tax credit in accordance with IRC Section 47 (the “Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit”). Registrant considers its activity to constitute a single industry segment.

Richman Tax Credit Properties II L.P. (the "General Partner"), a Delaware limited partnership, was formed on October 26, 1988 to act as the General Partner of Registrant. The general partner of the General Partner is Richman Tax Credits Inc. ("Richman Tax Credits"), a Delaware corporation that is wholly-owned by Richard Paul Richman. Richman Tax Credits is an affiliate of The Richman Group, Inc. ("Richman Group"), a Delaware corporation founded by Richard Paul Richman in 1988.

The Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on April 21, 1989 pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 under Registration Statement File No. 33-25337, and was declared effective on May 9, 1989. Reference is made to the prospectus dated May 10, 1989, as supplemented by Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2 dated July 25, 1989 and September 18, 1989, respectively, filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Prospectus"). Pursuant to Rule 12b-23 of the SEC’s General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the description of Registrant's business set forth under the heading "Investment Objectives and Policies" at pages 47 through 70 of the Prospectus is hereby incorporated into this Annual Report by reference.

On June 14, 1989, Registrant commenced, through Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("Merrill Lynch"), the offering of up to 100,000 units of limited partnership interest (the "Units") at $1,000 per Unit to investors (the “Limited Partners”). On June 28, 1989, July 31, 1989 and September 22, 1989, the closings for 13,533, 20,560 and 21,653 Units, respectively, took place, amounting to aggregate Limited Partners’ capital contributions of $55,746,000.

Registrant's primary objective, to provide Low-income Housing Tax Credits to the Limited Partners, has been completed.  The relevant state tax credit agency allocated each of the Local Partnerships an amount of Low-income Housing Tax Credits, which are generally available for a ten year period from the year the Property is placed in service (the “Ten Year Credit Period”). The Ten Year Credit Period was fully exhausted with respect to all of the Properties as of December 31, 2005. The required holding period of each Property, in order to avoid Low-income Housing Tax Credit recapture, is fifteen years from the year in which the Low-income Housing Tax Credits commence on the last building of the Property (the "Compliance Period"). The Compliance Period of all of the Local Partnerships had expired as of December 31, 2006.  In addition, certain of the Local Partnerships entered into agreements with the relevant state tax credit agencies whereby the Local Partnerships must maintain the low-income nature of the Properties for a period which exceeds the Compliance Period (in certain circumstances, up to 50 years from when the Property is placed in service, but commonly 30 years from the date any such Property is placed in service), regardless of a sale of the Properties by the Local Partnerships after the Compliance Period (the “Extended Use Provisions”). Note that the existence of Extended Use Provisions does not extend the Compliance Period of the respective Local Partnerships. However, such provisions may limit the number and availability of potential purchasers of the Properties. Accordingly, a sale of a Property may happen well after the expiration of the Compliance Period and/or may be significantly discounted.

Registrant is in the process of disposing of its remaining Local Partnership Interests. As of June 2014,26, 2015, Registrant owns nineteenfive of the fifty Local Partnership Interests initially acquired (see discussion below regarding Queen Lane Investors’ (“Queen Lane”) sale of its underlying Property).acquired.  In a prior year, Registrant served a demand on the general partners of all then remaining Local Partnerships (the “Local General Partners”) to commence a sale process to dispose of the Properties. In the event a sale cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. It is not possible to ascertain the amount, if any, that Registrant will receive with respect to each specific Property from such sales or assignments. Registrant intends to dissolve after the final disposition of its remaining Local Partnership Interests; there can be no assurance as to when Registrant will dispose of its remaining Local Partnership Interests.

Pursuant to Rule 12b-23 of the SEC’s General Rules and Regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act, the description of Registrant's competition, general risks, tax risks and partnership risks set forth under the heading "Risk Factors" at pages 20 through 33 of the Prospectus is hereby incorporated into this Annual Report by reference.

Registrant employs no personnel and incurs no payroll costs. All management activities of Registrant are conducted by the General Partner. Affiliates of the General Partner employ individuals who perform the management activities of Registrant. These entities also perform similar services for other affiliates of the General Partner.

The following is a brief summary of certain regulations applicable to Registrant and is not, nor should it be considered, a full summary of the law or all related issues. Other than as set forth above and below, Registrant is not aware of any existing or probable federal, state or local governmental regulations, or any recent changes to such governmental regulations, which would have an effect on Registrant’s business.

Virtually allFour of the five remaining Properties owned by the Local Partnerships have some form of a government funded rental subsidy that affords the low-income tenants the ability to reside at the Properties. During the period that a subsidy agreement between the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and a Local Partnership is in existence, the Local Partnership Interest of such Local Partnership may not be sold, and the Property may not be transferred by the Local Partnership to another entity, without HUD’s approval, which may be subject to various conditions. In particular, the transfer of title of the Properties by the Local Partnerships is expected to be required to be closed in escrow pending HUD approval. In addition, as a condition to certain disposals, Registrant anticipates that HUD will require the Local Partnerships to dedicate resources to maintenance in order to correct deficiencies in the physical condition of the Properties. Correction of such deficiencies will probably require expenditures of significant amounts of funds, thus effectively reducing the amount of any net proceeds from the sale of the Property. There can be no assurance that the required governmental agencies will approve any of the requested transfers, that such approvals will be received in a timely manner or that other conditions will not be imposed for such approvals. The failure to obtain or a delay in obtaining any required approvals would have adverse consequences to the Limited Partners.

In the case of certain of the Local Partnerships, the local housing authority has the right, for a period of time, to find a purchaser for the Property prior to the Local General Partner beginning its own efforts to sell the Property. There can be no assurance that the local housing authorities will be successful in finding purchasers for such Properties, which may adversely impact the timing of Property sales.

Certain of the Local Partnerships are subject to restrictions on the amount of annual cash distributions to partners under the terms of such Local Partnerships’ loan, regulatory or other agreements.

Registrant is not aware of any non-compliance by the Local Partnerships with respect to federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of material into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, and is not aware of any condition that would have a material effect on the capital expenditures or competitive position of Registrant.

It is generally expected, therefore, that in the event a sale of a Property by a Local Partnership can be consummated, the net proceeds of such sale, after repayment of any outstanding debt and other liabilities, are not likely to be significant. Moreover, a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of a Property by a Local Partnership may be payable to the Local General Partner and/or affiliates thereof for prior operating advances and deferred fees. As such, there will likely not be significant proceeds, if any, upon a sale of a Property that will be available for distribution by the Local Partnership to Registrant. In the event a sale cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. However, it is not possible to ascertain the amount, if any, that Registrant will receive with respect to each specific Property from such sales or assignments.

Registrant’s investment in the Local Partnerships is subject to the risks associated with multi-family rental property and real estate in general, including retail, commercial and residential real estate. Such risks, which are subject to change and are not in the control of Registrant, include risks related to:

 

The occurrence of any of the above risks could have a negative impact on the operating results of such Properties and the respective Local Partnerships and, in turn, may render the sale or refinancing of the Properties difficult or unattractive, which could adversely affect Registrant’s investment in such Local Partnerships.

Virtually allFour of the five remaining Properties owned by the Local Partnerships have some form of a government funded rental subsidy, which affords the low-income tenants the ability to reside at the Properties. The Local Partnerships are extremely reliant on such subsidies. If the respective rental subsidy programs were to be materially modified or eliminated, the Local Partnerships’ rental revenue would likely be significantly reduced. To the extent that revenues are not sufficient to meet operating expenses and service the respective mortgages of the Properties, such Local Partnership would be required to use reserves and any other funds available to avoid foreclosure of the subject Property. Registrant’s investments in the Local Partnerships are highly leveraged, and there can be no assurance that additional funds would be available to any Local Partnership or Registrant, if needed. In addition, there can be no assurance that, when a Property is sold, the proceeds from a sale will be sufficient to pay the balance due on the mortgage loans or any other outstanding indebtedness to which the Local Partnership is subject.

While a limited exception is provided for Low-income Housing Tax Credits in the case of individuals, tax losses and credits allocated to a Limited Partner who is an individual, trust, estate or personal service corporation generally may be used to reduce the Limited Partner’s tax liability only to the extent that such liability arises from passive activities.  Therefore, tax losses and credits allocated to such a Limited Partner are not expected to be available to offset tax liabilities that arise from salaries, dividends and interest and other forms of income. In addition, Low-income Housing Tax Credits cannot be used to offset alternative minimum tax. Accordingly, there is no guarantee that Limited Partners will be able to utilize all of the carried forward Low-income Housing Tax Credits.

There is no trading market for Units and there are no assurances that any market will develop. In addition, the Units may be transferred only if certain requirements are satisfied, including requirements that such transfer would not impair Registrant’s tax status for federal income tax purposes and would not be a violation of federal or state securities laws.  Accordingly, Limited Partners may not be able to sell their Units promptly and bear the economic risk of their investment for an indefinite period of time.

At some point, Registrant’s operations (including the sale or refinancing of the Properties owned by the Local Partnerships) may generate less cash flow than taxable income, and the income, as well as the income taxes payable with respect to Registrant’s taxable income, may exceed cash flow available for distribution to the Limited Partners in such years. This may result in an out-of-pocket tax cost to the Limited Partners. In addition, a Limited Partner may experience taxable gain on disposition of Units or upon a disposition of the Local Partnership Interests or of the Properties even though no cash is realized on the disposition; in such circumstances, the Limited Partners may experience an out-of-pocket tax cost.

Not applicable.

The executive offices of Registrant and the General Partner are located at 340 Pemberwick Road, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831. Registrant does not own or lease any properties. Registrant pays no rent; all charges for leased space are borne by an affiliate of the General Partner.

In the event a sale of the remaining Properties cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. It is not possible to ascertain the amount, if any, that Registrant will receive with respect to each specific Property from such sales or assignments. In addition, certain of the Local Partnerships entered into agreements with Extended Use Provisions with the relevant state tax credit agencies whereby the Local Partnerships must maintain the low-income nature of the Properties for a period which exceeds the Compliance Period (in certain circumstances, up to 50 years from when the Property is placed in service, but commonly 30 years from the date any such Property is placed in service), regardless of a sale of the Properties by the Local Partnerships after the Compliance Period. While the Extended Use Provisions do not extend the Compliance Period of the respective Local Partnerships, such provisions may limit the number and availability of potential purchasers of the Properties. Accordingly, a sale of a Property may happen well after the expiration of the Compliance Period and/or may be significantly discounted. There can be no assurance as to when the Local Partnerships will dispose of the Properties, when Registrant will dispose of the remaining Local Partnership Interests or the amount of proceeds which may be received in such dispositions. In addition to amounts that remain outstanding under the terms of the debt structure of the respective Local Partnerships, certain Local Partnerships have outstanding obligations to the Local General Partners and/or affiliates thereof for operating advances made over the years and for certain fees that were deferred.

ManyFour of the five remaining Local Partnerships receive rental subsidy payments, five of which include payments under Section 8 of Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (“Section 8”) (see descriptions of the subsidies below). The subsidy agreements expire at various times. Since October 1997, HUD has issued a series of directives related to project based Section 8 contracts that define owners’ notification responsibilities, advise owners of project based Section 8 properties of what their options are regarding the renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide guidance and procedures to owners, management agents, contract administrators and HUD staff concerning renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide policies and procedures on setting renewal rents and handling renewal rent adjustments and provide the requirements and procedures for opting-out of a Section 8 project based contract. Registrant cannot predict legislative initiatives and governmental budget negotiations, the outcome of which could result in a reduction in funds available for the various federal and state administered housing programs including the Section 8 program. Such changes could adversely affect the future net operating income before debt service (“NOI”) and debt structure of any or allthe Local Partnerships currently receiving such subsidy or similar subsidies.subsidy. The fivefour Local Partnerships’ Section 8 contracts, certain of which cover only certain rental units, are currently subject to renewal under applicable HUD guidelines. OfTwo of the fivefour Local Partnerships noted above, two entered into restructuring agreements in a prior year, resulting in changes to both rent subsidy and mandatory debt service.

None.

There is no established public trading market for the Units. Accordingly, accurate information as to the market value of a Unit at any given date is not available. The number of record holders of Units as of June 17, 201415, 2015 was approximately 2,287,2,073, holding an aggregate of 55,746 Units.

Registrant may provide an estimate of value to Unit holders from time to time in Registrant's reports to Limited Partners. Estimated values for limited partnership interests may also be provided by independent valuation services, whose estimated values are based on financial and other information available to them. The estimated values provided by the independent services and Registrant, which may differ, are not market values and Unit holders may not be able to sell their Units or realize either amount upon a sale of their Units. Unit holders may not realize such estimated values upon the liquidation of Registrant.

Low-income Housing Tax Credits and Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits (collectively, the “Tax Credits”), which are subject to various limitations, may be used by the Limited Partners to offset federal income tax liabilities. Registrant generated total Tax Credits from investments in Local Partnerships of approximately $1,499 per Unit, net of circumstances which have given rise to recapture. The Ten Year Credit Period with respect to all of the Properties was fully exhausted as of December 31, 2005 and the Compliance Periods of the Local Partnerships had expired as of December 31, 2006. In a prior year, Registrant served a demand on the Local General Partners of all then remaining Local Partnerships to commence a sale process to dispose of the Properties. In the event a sale cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. It is not possible to ascertain the amount, if any, that Registrant will receive with respect to each specific Property from such sales or assignments.

None.

Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this Item.

Registrant admitted limited partners (the “Limited Partners”) in three closings with aggregate Limited Partners’ capital contributions of $55,746,000. In connection with the offering of the sale of units (the “Units”), Registrant incurred organization and offering costs of approximately $6,534,000 and established a working capital reserve of approximately $3,345,000. The remaining net proceeds of approximately $45,867,000 (the “Net Proceeds”) were available to be applied to the acquisition of limited partner interests (the “Local Partnership Interests”) in partnerships (the “Local Partnerships”) that own low-income multifamily residential complexes (the “Property” or “Properties”) that qualified for the low-income housing tax credit (the “Low-income Housing Tax Credit”) in accordance with Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”); one Local Partnership ownsowned a Property that also qualified for the historic rehabilitation tax credit in accordance with IRC Section 47. The Net Proceeds were utilized in acquiring a Local Partnership Interest in fifty Local Partnerships.

Cumulative losses and cash distributions in excess of investment in local partnerships may result from a variety of circumstances, including a Local Partnership's accounting policies, subsidy structure, debt structure and operating deficits, among other things. Accordingly, cumulative losses and cash distributions in excess of the investment are not necessarily indicative of adverse operating results of a Local Partnership.

Registrant’s operations for the years ended March 30, 20142015 and 20132014 resulted in net income of $177,493$4,518,605 and $2,156,636,$177,493, respectively. The decrease in net income from fiscal 2013 to fiscal 2014increase is primarily attributable to (i) a decreasean increase in gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties of approximately $2,241,000$4,625,000 and (ii) a decrease in equity in income of investment in local partnerships of approximately $206,000, which decrease is attributable to Registrant’s investment in local partnerships reaching a zero balance as of March 30, 2013, all partially offset by (i) an increase in other income from local partnerships of approximately $365,000 and (ii) a net decrease in operating expenses of approximately $91,000, resulting primarily from a decrease in administration and management fees in the aggregate of approximately $67,000.$68,000, all partially offset by a decrease in other income from local partnerships of approximately $358,000. Other comprehensive loss for the year ended March 30, 20132015 resulted from the reclassification of unrealized gain on investment in Pemberwick of $9,383 and an unrealized loss on investment in Pemberwick of $10,930.$5,712.

The Local Partnerships’ net income of approximately $8,402,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes gain on sale of property of approximately $8,820,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $1,312,000 and interest on non-mandatory debt of approximately $290,000, and does not include principal payments on permanent mortgages of approximately $515,000. The Local Partnerships’ net income of approximately $1,036,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes gain on sale of property of approximately $2,043,000, depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $1,851,000 and interest on non-mandatory debt of approximately $310,000, and does not include principal payments on permanent mortgages of approximately $648,000. The Local Partnerships’ net loss of approximately $294,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $2,584,000 and interest on non-mandatory debt of approximately $203,000, and does not include principal payments on permanent mortgages of approximately $572,000. The results of operations of the Local Partnerships for the year ended December 31, 20132014 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected in future periods. Revenue and expense fluctuations from 20122013 to 20132014 have resulted primarily from Registrant’s sales of Local Partnership Interests and certain Local Partnerships’ Property sales.

Registrant's primary objective, to provide Low-income Housing Tax Credits to the Limited Partners, has been completed.  The relevant state tax credit agency allocated each of the Local Partnerships an amount of Low-income Housing Tax Credits, which are generally available for a ten year period from the year the Property is placed in service (the “Ten Year Credit Period”). The Ten Year Credit Period was fully exhausted with respect to all of the Properties as of December 31, 2005. The required holding period of each Property, in order to avoid Low-income Housing Tax Credit recapture, is fifteen years from the year in which the Low-income Housing Tax Credits commence on the last building of the Property (the "Compliance Period"). The Compliance Period of all of the Local Partnerships had expired as of December 31, 2006. In addition, certain of the Local Partnerships entered into agreements with the relevant state tax credit agencies whereby the Local Partnerships must maintain the low-income nature of the Properties for a period which exceeds the Compliance Period (in certain circumstances, up to 50 years from when the Property is placed in service, but commonly 30 years from the date any such Property is placed in service), regardless of a sale of the Properties by the Local Partnerships after the Compliance Period (the “Extended Use Provisions”). Although the Extended Use Provisions do not extend the Compliance Period of the respective Local Partnerships, such provisions may limit the number and availability of potential purchasers of the Properties. Accordingly, a sale of a Property may happen well after the expiration of the Compliance Period and/or may be significantly discounted. Registrant is in the process of disposing of its remaining Local Partnership Interests. As of June 2014,26, 2015, Registrant owns nineteenfive of the fifty Local Partnership Interests initially acquired (see discussion below regarding Queen Lane Investors’ (“Queen Lane”) sale of its underlying Property).acquired. In a prior year, Registrant served a demand on the general partners of all then remaining Local Partnerships (the “Local General Partners”) to commence a sale process to dispose of the Properties. In the event a sale cannot be consummated, it is the General Partner’s intention to sell or assign Registrant’s remaining Local Partnership Interests. It is uncertain as to the amount, if any, that Registrant will receive with respect to each specific Property from such sales or assignments. Registrant intends to dissolve after the final disposition of its remaining Local Partnership Interests; there can be no assurance as to when Registrant will dispose of its remaining Local Partnership Interests.

The remaining Properties are principally comprised of subsidized and leveraged low-income multifamily residential complexes located throughoutin Arkansas, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Four of the United States. Many of thefive remaining Local Partnerships receive rental subsidy payments, five of which include payments under Section 8 of Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 ("Section 8”). The subsidy agreements expire at various times. Since October 1997, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) has issued a series of directives related to project based Section 8 contracts that define owners’ notification responsibilities, advise owners of project based Section 8 properties of what their options are regarding the renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide guidance and procedures to owners, management agents, contract administrators and HUD staff concerning renewal of Section 8 contracts, provide policies and procedures on setting renewal rents and handling renewal rent adjustments and provide the requirements and procedures for opting-out of a Section 8 project based contract. Registrant cannot predict legislative initiatives and governmental budget negotiations, the outcome of which could result in a reduction in funds available for the various federal and state administered housing programs including the Section 8 program. Such changes could adversely affect the future net operating income before debt service (“NOI”) and debt structure of any or allthe Local Partnerships currently receiving such subsidy or similar subsidies.subsidy. The fivefour Local Partnerships’ Section 8 contracts, certain of which cover only certain rental units, are currently subject to renewal under applicable HUD guidelines. OfTwo of the fivefour Local Partnerships noted above, two entered into restructuring agreements in a prior year, resulting in changes to both rent subsidy and mandatory debt service.

The remaining Local Partnerships have various financing structures which include (i) required debt service payments (“Mandatory Debt Service”) and (ii) debt service payments which are payable only from available cash flow subject to the terms and conditions of the notes, which may be subject to specific laws, regulations and agreements with appropriate federal and state agencies (“Non-Mandatory Debt Service or Interest"). Registrant has no legal obligation to fund any operating deficits of the Local Partnerships.

During the year ended March 30, 2013, Registrant sold its Local Partnership Interest in North Hills Farms Limited Partnership (“North Hills Farms”) to affiliates of the Local General Partners of North Hills Farms for $3,586,431 under the terms of a purchase agreement (the “North Hills Farms Purchase Agreement”). AfterRegistrant recognized a gain of $2,185,051 in connection with the sale. During the year ended March 30, 2014, after further resolution of the accounts of North Hills Farms’ accountsFarms under the terms of the North Hills Farms Purchase Agreement, the sale price was increased by $28,364; such amount is included in due from local partnerships in the accompanying balance sheet as of March 30, 2014 and was recorded as gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties for the year then then ended. The adjustment to the sale price was later reduced by $7,544; such amount is included in gain on sale of limited partner interests/local partnership properties in the accompanying statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year then ended.ended March 30, 2015.

The non-mandatory mortgages of Littleton Avenue Community Village, L.P. (“Littleton”) matured in October 2006 but have not been repaid or formally extended. In May 2014,During the year ended March 30, 2015, the first mortgage holder issued a declaration of default demanding Littleton’s immediate payment of an amount in excess of $6.5 million. Such amount includes all unpaid principal and accrued interest to date and amounts for real estate tax liens that had been sold to third parties and were redeemed by the lender. Unpaid principal and accrued interest on the second mortgage as of June 2014March 30, 2015 is in excess of $3.1 million. Littleton’s Local General Partner reports that a refinancing of the mortgages is unlikely.

Inflation is not expected to have a material adverse impact on Registrant's operations.

Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this Item.

Registrant does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on Registrant’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

The accompanying financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which requires Registrant to make certain estimates and assumptions. A summary of significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements. The following section is a summary of certain aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of Registrant’s financial condition and results of operations. Registrant believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the accompanying financial statements.

As a cautionary note, with the exception of historical facts, the matters discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, current expectations, forecasts of future events, future actions, future performance generally, business development activities, capital expenditures, strategies, the outcome of contingencies, future financial results, financing sources and availability and the effects of regulation and competition. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “estimate” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with discussions of future operating or financial performance signify forward-looking statements. Registrant may also provide written forward-looking statements in other materials released to the public. Such statements are made in good faith by Registrant pursuant to the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Reform Act. Registrant undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Such forward-looking statements involve known risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause Registrant’s actual results of operations or actions to be materially different from future results of operations or actions expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this Item.