QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x

ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20062009


orOr


o



TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-11499

WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

04-2916536

Delaware

04-2916536
(State or Other Jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer


Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


815 Chestnut Street, North Andover, MA


 


01845

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 688-1811

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(978) 688-1811


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class



Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Class A Common Stock, par value $.10$0.10 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ýx    No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o    No ýx

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrantregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrantregistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ýo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated"large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and large accelerated filer”"smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerýAccelerated filero

Non-accelerated filero


Smaller reporting companyo

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Large Accelerated filer x             Accelerated filer o            Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ýx

As of June 30, 2006,26, 2009, the aggregate market value of the registrant’sregistrant's common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $846,359,576$611,035,661 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’sissuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class

ClassOutstanding at February 23, 200719, 2010

Class A Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share

31,241,29829,585,969 shares

Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share

7,293,8807,193,880 shares

DOCUMENTS INCOPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’sRegistrant's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2007,12, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





PART I

Item 1.BUSINESS.

This annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K contains statements whichthat are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements contain projections of our future results of operations or our financial position or state other forward-looking information. In some cases you can identify these forward-looking statements by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will”"anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "should," and “would”"would" or similar words. You should not rely on forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that might cause these differences are described under Item 1A—"Risk Factors." You should carefully review all of these factors, and you should be aware that there may be other factors that could cause these differences. These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans and estimates at the date of this report, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.

In this annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, references to “the"the Company,” “Watts,” “we,” “us”" "Watts," "we," "us" or “our”"our" refer to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Overview

Watts Regulator Co. was founded by Joseph E. Watts in 1874 in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Watts Regulator Co. started as a small machine shop supplying parts to the New England textile mills of the 19th century and grew into a global manufacturer of products and systems focused on the control, conservation and quality of water and the comfort and safety of the people using it. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and became the parent Company of Watts Regulator Co.

Our “Water"Water by Watts”Watts" strategy is to be the leading provider of water quality, water conservation, water safety and water flow control products for the residential and commercial markets in North America and Europe with an emerginga growing presence in China.Asia. Our primary objective is to grow earnings by increasing sales within existing markets, expanding into new markets, leveraging our distribution channels and customer base, making selected acquisitions, reducing manufacturing costs and advocating for the development and enforcement of industry standards.

We intend to continue to introduce products in existing markets by enhancing our preferred brands, developing new complementary products, promoting plumbing code development to drive sales of safety and water quality products and continually improving merchandising in both the do-it-yourself (DIY) and wholesale distribution channels. We continually target selected new product and geographic markets based on growth potential, including our ability to leverage our existing distribution channels. Additionally, we continually leverage our distribution channels through the introduction of new products, as well as the integration of products of our acquired companies.

        We intend to continue to generate growth by targeting selected acquisitions, both in our core markets as well as new complementary markets. We have completed 3032 acquisitions since divesting our industrial and oil and gas business in 1999, including five acquisitions in 2006 and nine acquisitions in 2005.1999. Our acquisition strategy focuses on businesses that manufacture preferred brand name products that address our themes of water quality, water safety,conservation, water conservation,safety, water flow control and comfort and related complementary markets. We target businesses that will provide us with one or more of the following: an entry into new markets, an increase in shelf space with existing customers, strong brand names, a new or improved technology or an expansion of the breadth of our Water by Watts offering.offerings.


        We are committed to reducing our manufacturing and operating costs through a combination of expanding manufacturing in lower-cost countries, using Lean Six Sigma to drive continuous improvement across all key processes, and consolidating our diverse manufacturing operations in North


America, Europe and Europe.China. We have acquired a number of manufacturing facilities in lower-cost regions such as China, Bulgaria and Tunisia,Tunisia. In both 2007 and 2009, we announced global restructuring plans to reduce our manufacturing footprint in order to reduce our costs and to realize additional operating efficiencies. In February 2010, we announced a plan to continue to shift production to these lower-cost regions.consolidate our manufacturing operations in France. See Recent Developments in Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for more details.

Our products are sold to wholesale distributors and dealers, major DIY chains and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Most of our sales are for products that have been approved under regulatory standards incorporated into state and municipal plumbing, heating, building and fire protection codes in North America and Europe. We have consistently advocated the development and enforcement of plumbing codes and are committed to providing products to meet these standards, particularly for safety and control valve products. These codes serve as a competitive barrier to entry by requiring that products sold in select statesjurisdictions meet stringent criteria.

Additionally, a majority of our manufacturing facilities are ISO 9000, 9001 or 9002 certified by the International Organization for Standardization.

Our business is reported in three geographic segments: North America, Europe and China. The contributions of each segment to net sales, operating income and the presentation of certain other financial information by segment are reported in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report.

Recent AcquisitionsDisposition and Liquidation

On August 14, 2006, we acquired 100%        In September 2009, our Board of Directors approved the outstanding stocksale of Black Teknigas, Limited (Teknigas) locatedour investment in St. Neots, United Kingdom for approximately $8,700,000, which is net of cash acquired of approximately $300,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $3,585,000 and $4,493,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for technology and customer relationships that have estimated useful lives ranging from 6 to 9 years and trade names with indefinite lives. Teknigas designs, develops and manufactures a range of gas control products and systems for combustion, industrial, medical, laboratory and specialty gas.

On June 7, 2006, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Kim Olofsson Safe Corporation AB (KimSafe) located in Almhult, Sweden for approximately $5,800,000, which is net of cash acquired of approximately $2,900,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $887,000 and $4,436,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated useful lives of 5 years and trade names with indefinite lives. KimSafe manufactures electronic controls for heat pump, solar and pellet heaters, which provide the ability to heat water using renewable energy.

On June 2, 2006, we acquired the assets and business of Calflex Manufacturing, Inc. (Calflex) located in Vernon, California and the stock of Ningo Best Metal & Plastic Manufacturing, Ltd (Ningbo) located in Ningbo, China for an aggregate of approximately $6,600,000. The allocation for intangible assets is approximately $2,389,000. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated useful lives of 12 years and trade names with indefinite lives. Calflex and Ningbo distribute and manufacture water connectors.

On May 19, 2006, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of ATS Expansion Group (ATS) located in Sorgues, Grenoble and Hautvillers, France for approximately $62,100,000, which is net of cash acquired of approximately $5,600,000 plus assumed debt of approximately $14,100,000. The preliminary allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $32,690,000 and $26,520,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships with estimated useful lives of 6 years, patents with estimated useful lives from 6 to 12 years and trade names with indefinite lives. ATS’ products include a broad range of fittings, valves and manifolds for water, gas and heating applications and stainless steel flexible hoses. The purchase price allocation for ATS is preliminary pending the final determination of fair values of intangible assets and certain assumed assets and liabilities.


On April 26, 2006, we acquired the assets and business of ChangshaWatts Valve Works (Changsha) Co., Ltd. (CWV), located in Changsha, China for approximately $9,200,000,China. We completed the sale of which approximately $1,184,000 remains to be paid subject to certain conditions being met. The preliminary allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $3,447,000 and $3,971,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assetsCWV in January 2010. CWV is primarily for non-compete agreements that have estimated useful lives of 10 years and customer order backlog with an estimated useful life of 1 year. Changsha is a leading manufacturer of large diameter hydraulic-actuated butterfly valves for thermo-power and hydro-power plants, water distribution projects and water works projects in China. The purchase price allocationManagement determined the CWV business no longer fit strategically with the Company.

        In May 2009, we commenced proceedings to liquidate our TEAM Precision Pipework, Ltd. (TEAM) business, located in Ammanford, U.K. TEAM custom designed and manufactured manipulated pipe and hose tubing assemblies and served the heating, ventilation and air conditioning and automotive markets in Western Europe. Management determined the business no longer fit strategically with the Company and that a sale of TEAM was not feasible. On May 22, 2009, we appointed an administrator for Changsha is preliminary pendingTEAM under the final determinationUnited Kingdom Insolvency Act of fair values of certain assumed1986. During the administration process, the administrator has sole control over, and responsibility for, TEAM's operations, assets and liabilities.

On April 5, 2006, We deconsolidated TEAM when the administrator obtained control of TEAM. During the third quarter of 2009, we were informed that the administrator completed the planned increasesale of our ownershipTEAM's assets for funds sufficient to pay all creditors. We evaluated the operations of TEAM and determined that it will not have a continuing involvement in Watts Stern Rubinetti, S.r.l. (Stern) from 85%TEAM's operations and cash flows. During the fourth quarter, the administrator determined that all TEAM creditors had been contacted and they had agreed to 100%. The price paid for this additional 15% interest was approximately $387,000.

On December 28, 2005, we acquired 100%full settlements of the stockrespective debts owed by TEAM. Further, the administrator believes that liquidation of Dormont Manufacturing Company (Dormont) locatedTEAM will result in Export, Pennsylvania, for approximately $93,916,000 net$0.8 million being returned to us as excess proceeds from liquidation. We recorded this amount in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter. The legal liquidation of cash acquired of approximately $1,506,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $39,190,000 and $38,600,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assetsTEAM is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated 13-year lives and trade names with indefinite lives. Dormont provides flexible stainless steel connectors for natural and liquid propane gas. Dormont works with appliance OEMsexpected to provide internal component assemblies and private label gas connectors, which are sold underbe finalized by the OEM brand with the appliance in multiple leading retail chains. Dormont also supplies residential gas connectors through multiple trade channels and home improvement retailers. Dormont provides a core-plumbing product, which is complementary to our existing water product lines.

On December 2, 2005, we acquired 100%end of the stockfirst quarter of Core Industries Inc. (Core) from SPX Corporation for approximately $46,369,0002010.

        Detailed financial information concerning these two disposals is provided in cash. Core consists of FEBCO, Mueller Steam Specialty and Polyjet Valves product lines. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $16,559,000 and $8,320,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for trade names with indefinite lives and customer relationships that have estimated 12-year lives. FEBCO is a manufacturer of backflow prevention valves and has a strong presence in both residential and commercial landscape irrigation. Mueller Steam Specialty allows us to expand into large diameter commercial strainers and check valves. Polyjet Valves offers a customized sleeve valve, which is used in severe service applications to provide precise flow and pressure control.

On November 4, 2005, we acquired the assets of Flexflow Tubing LLP (Flexflow), located in Langley, British Columbia, Canada for approximately $6,500,000. The purchase agreement contains an earn-out provision to be calculated over a five-year period ending December 31, 2010. Earn-out payments under the purchase agreement, if any, will not exceed $4,300,000 and will be treated as additional purchase price. For 2006, we recorded approximately $260,000 in additional goodwill related to the first year earn-out provision. Flexflow manufactures pex tubing for potable and non-potable applications. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $3,500,000 and $868,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated 12-year lives. The acquisition of Flexflow is consistent with our strategy to increase our presence in the under floor radiant heating and potable water markets. This acquisition allows us to expand our presence in the market for flexible pex pipes for hot and cold-water transport.

On July 8, 2005, we acquired the water connector businessNote 3 of the Donald E. Savard Company  (Savard)Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in an asset purchase transactionthis report. All prior years amounts for approximately $3,680,000. The allocations for goodwillCWV and intangible assets are approximately $1,350,000 and $1,750,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for trade names with indefinite lives and customer relationships thatTEAM have 14-year lives. The acquisition of the water connector business of Savard is consistent with our theme ofbeen reclassified to discontinued operations throughout this document.


water safety and control. This acquisition allows us to expand our presence in one of our leading product lines withProducts

        We have a brand name that is well known to the plumbing wholesale market.

On July 5, 2005, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Microflex N.V. (Microflex) located in Rotselaar, Belgium for approximately $14,900,000 net of cash acquired of approximately $875,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $6,507,000 and $5,315,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have 7-year lives and trade names that have indefinite lives. Microflex produces and distributes flexible, pre-insulated, pex pipes for hot and cold-water transport, as well as a range of accessory products including couplings, caps, and insulation kits to the HVAC and water protection markets.

On June 20, 2005, we acquired the water softener business of Alamo Water Refiners, Inc. (Alamo) located in San Antonio, Texas in an asset purchase transaction for approximately $5,100,000. The allocation for intangible assets is approximately $285,000 and is primarily for the trade name with an indefinite life. There was no allocation to goodwill. The water softener products of Alamo are consistent with our theme of water quality and provide many synergistic opportunities when utilized in conjunction with our existing water filtration and water quality businesses. The acquisition of Alamo also expands our distribution presence into the southwestern U.S. markets.

On May 11, 2005, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Electro Controls Ltd. (Electro Controls) located in Hounslow, United Kingdom for approximately $11,737,000 net of cash acquired of approximately $5,014,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $5,788,000 and $315,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for trade names that have indefinite lives. Electro Controls designs and assembles a range of electrical controls for the HVAC market, with sales primarily in the United Kingdom.

On January 5, 2005, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of HF Scientific, Inc. (HF) located in Fort Myers, Florida for approximately $7,260,000 in cash plus $800,000 in assumed debt. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $4,178,000 and $2,660,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have 15-year lives and trade names that have indefinite lives.  HF manufactures and distributes a line of instrumentation equipment, test kits and chemical reagents used for monitoring water quality in a variety of applications.

On January 4, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Sea Tech, Inc. (Sea Tech) located in Wilmington, North Carolina for approximately $10,100,000 in cash. The purchase agreement contains an earn-out provision to be calculated on a cumulative basis over a three-year period ending December 31, 2007. Payments under the agreement, if any, will not exceed $5,000,000 and will be treated as additional purchase price. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $6,505,000 and $3,033,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have 15-year lives and trade names that have indefinite lives. Sea Tech provides cost-effective solutions for fluidic connection needs. Sea Tech offers a wide range of standard and custom quick connect fittings, valves and manifolds and pex tubing designed to address specific customer requirements.

Products

We believe that we have the broadestbroad range of products in terms of design distinction, size and configuration in a majority of our principal product lines. In 2009 and 2008, water quality products accounted for approximately 14% and 17%, respectively, of our total sales. Our principal product lines include:

    ·water quality products, including backflow preventers and check valves for preventing contamination of potable water caused by reverse flow within water supply lines and fire protection systems;

    systems and point-of-use and point-of-entry water filtration and reverse osmosis systems for both commercial and residential applications;·

    a wide range of water pressure regulators for both commercial and residential applications;

    ·

    drainage products for industrial, commercial, marine and residential applications;

    water supply and drainage products for commercial and residential applications;



    ·temperature and pressure relief valves for water heaters, boilers and associated systems;

    ·

           point-of-use water filtration and reverse osmosis systems for both commercial and residential applications;

    ·thermostatic mixing valves for tempering water in commercial and residential applications;

    ·

    systems for under-floor radiant applications and hydraulic pump groups for gas boiler manufacturers and renewable energy applications, including solar and heat pump control packages;

    and·

    flexible stainless steel connectors for natural and liquid propane gas in commercial food service and residential applications; and

    applications.

·       large diameter butterfly valves for use in China’s water infrastructure.

Customers and Markets

We sell our products to plumbing, heating and mechanical wholesale distributors, major DIY chains and OEMs.

Wholesalers.Approximately 65% and 64% of our sales in 2006both 2009 and 2005, respectively,2008 were to wholesale distributors for both commercial and residential applications. We rely on commissioned manufacturers’manufacturers' representatives, some of which maintain a consigned inventory of our products, to market our product lines. Additionally, various water quality products are sold to independent dealers throughout North America.

DIY.Approximately 16% and 18%14% of our sales in 20062009 and 2005,2008, respectively, were to DIY customers in North America.customers. Our DIY customers demand less technical products, but are highly receptive to innovative designs and new product ideas. Our DIY sales over the past several years have increased as a result of our development of unique new products and successful merchandising efforts and the expansion of the market with the large national chains. We expect that our DIY sales in Europe will increase significantly as a result of our recent acquisition of ATS.

OEMs.Approximately 19% and 18%21% of our sales in 20062009 and 2005,2008, respectively, were to OEMs in both North America and Europe.OEMs. In North America, our typical OEM customers are water heater manufacturers, equipment manufacturers needing flow control devices and water systems manufacturers needing backflow preventers. Our sales to OEMs in Europe are primarily to boiler manufacturers, and radiant systems manufacturers. Our sales to OEMs in China are primarily to boiler and bath manufacturers including manufacturers of faucet and shower products.

        In both 2009 and 2008, no customer accounted for more than 10% of our total net sales. Our largest customer, The Home Depot, Inc. and its subsidiaries,top ten customers accounted for approximately $122,700,000,$306.4 million, or 10.0%25%, of our total net sales in 20062009 and $98,500,000,$302.2 million, or 10.7 %, of our total net sales in 2005. Our top ten customers accounted for approximately $282,300,000, or 22.9%21%, of our total net sales in 2006 and $238,100,000, or 25.8%, of our total net sales in 2005.2008. Thousands of other customers constituted the remaining 77.1%75% of our net sales in 20062009 and 74.2%79% of our net sales in 2005.2008.

Marketing and Sales

We rely primarily on commissioned manufacturers’manufacturers' representatives to sell our products, some of which maintain a consigned inventory of our products. These representatives sell primarily to plumbing and heating wholesalers or service DIY store locations in North America. We also sell products for the residential construction and home repair and remodeling industries through DIY plumbing retailers,



national catalog distribution companies, hardware stores, building material outlets and retail home center chains and through plumbing and heating wholesalers. In addition, we sell products directly to certain large OEMs and private label accounts.


Manufacturing

We have integrated and automated manufacturing capabilities, including a bronze and iron foundries,foundry, machining, plastic extrusion and injection molding and assembly operations. Our foundry operations include metal pouring systems, automatic core making, yellow brass forging and brass and bronze die-castings. Our machining operations feature computer-controlled machine tools, high-speed chucking machines with robotics and automatic screw machines for machining bronze, brass and steel components. We have invested heavily in recent years to expand our manufacturing basecapabilities and to ensure the availability of the most efficient and productive equipment. We are committed to maintaining our manufacturing equipment at a level consistent with current technology in order to maintain high levels of quality and manufacturing efficiencies.

Capital expenditures and depreciation for each of the last three years were as follows:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

44,648

 

$

18,590

 

$

20,999

 

Depreciation

 

$

26,656

 

$

23,542

 

$

26,290

 

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Capital expenditures

 $24.2 $26.2 $36.9 

Depreciation

 $33.7 $31.5 $28.1 

The Company’s 2006 capital expenditures included approximately $18,000,000 related to the purchase and subsequent sale-leaseback of a building in Italy.

Raw Materials

We require substantial amounts of raw materials to produce our products, including bronze, brass, cast iron, steel, plastic, and plastic,components used in products, and substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from outside sources. WeThe commodity markets have experienced increases intremendous volatility over the costspast several years, particularly copper. The market prices of certain raw materials, particularly copper.many commodities decreased during the latter half of 2008, but increased throughout 2009. Bronze and brass are copper-based alloys. The spot price of copper increased approximately 33%153.1% from December 31, 20052008 to December 31, 2006. In response, we have implemented price increases for some2009. We typically carry several months of our products that have become more expensive to manufactureinventory on-hand primarily due to the increases in raw material costs. During 2006, cost increases in raw materials were not completely recovered by increased selling prices or other product cost reductions.significant extent of our international sourcing. We are not able to predict whether commodity costs, including copper, will significantly increase or for how long these cost increases will continue.decrease in the future. If these cost increases continuecommodity costs increase in the future and we are not able to reduce or eliminate the effect of the cost increases by reducing production costs or implementing price increases, our profit margins could decrease. If commodity costs were to decline, we may experience pressures from customers to reduce our selling prices. The timing of any price reductions and decreases in commodity costs may not align. As a result, our near-term margins in 2010 could decline.

        With limited exceptions, we do not single source our commodities or other raw materials. Generally we have multiple suppliers for our commodities and other raw materials. We believe our relationships with our key suppliers are good and that an interruption in supply from any supplier would not materially affect our ability to meet our immediate demands while another supplier is qualified. We regularly review our suppliers to evaluate their strengths. If a supplier is evaluated as having potential financial troubles or will be unable to meet our demands, we believe that our inventory of raw materials will allow for sufficient time to identify and obtain the necessary commodities and other raw materials from an alternate source. We believe that the nature of our commodities or other raw materials are such that multiple sources are generally available in the market.


Code Compliance

Products representing a majority of our sales are subject to regulatory standards and code enforcement which typically require that these products meet stringent performance criteria. Standards are established by such industry test and certification organizations as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (A.S.M.E.), the Canadian Standards Association (C.S.A.), the American Society of Sanitary Engineers (A.S.S.E.), the University of Southern California Foundation for Cross-Connection Control (USC FCC), the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (I.A.P.M.O.), Factory Mutual (F.M.), the National Sanitation Foundation (N.S.F.) and Underwriters Laboratory (U.L.). TheseMany of these standards are incorporated into state and municipal plumbing and heating, building and fire protection codes.

National regulatory standards in Europe vary by country. The major standards and/or guidelines whichthat our products must meet are AFNOR (France), DVGW (Germany), UNI/ICIN (Italy), KIWA (Netherlands), SVGW (Switzerland), SITAC (Sweden) and WRAS (United Kingdom). Further, there are local regulatory standards requiring compliance as well.


Together with our commissioned manufacturers’manufacturers' representatives, we have consistently advocated for the development and enforcement of plumbing codes. We maintain stringent quality control and testing procedures at each of our manufacturing facilities in order to manufacture products in compliance with code requirements.

We believe that product-testing capability and investment in plant and equipment is needed to manufacture products in compliance with code requirements. Additionally, a majority of our manufacturing facilities are ISO 9000, 9001 or 9002 certified by the International Organization for Standardization.

New Product Development and Engineering

We maintain our own product development staff, design teams, and testing laboratories in North America, Europe and China that continuously work to enhance our existing products and develop new products. We maintain sophisticated product development and testing laboratories. Research and development costs included in selling, general, and administrative expense amounted to $12,650,000, $11,576,000$17.8 million, $17.5 million and $9,942,000$15.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.

        On January 1, 2010, California and Vermont enacted laws that require all pipes, pipe and plumbing fittings and plumbing fixtures sold in those states that convey or dispense water for human consumption to contain virtually no lead content. Other states are currently considering similar legislation and we expect that similar laws may be adopted in other states in the future. We have invested considerable resources over the past several years to develop lead free versions of our plumbing products to comply with these new laws, and we introduced our lead free product offerings in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Competition

The domestic and international markets for water safety and flow control devices are intensely competitive and require us to compete against some companies possessing greater financial, marketing and other resources than ours. Due to the breadth of our product offerings, the number and identities of our competitors vary by product line and market. We consider brand preference, engineering specifications, plumbing code requirements, price, technological expertise, delivery times and breadth of product offerings to be the primary competitive factors. We believe that new product development and product engineering are also important to success in the water industry and that our position in the industry is attributable in part to our ability to develop new and innovative products quickly and to adapt and enhance existing products. We continue to develop new and innovative products to enhance market position and are continuing to implement manufacturing and design programs to reduce costs. We cannot be certain that our efforts to develop new products will be successful or that our customers



will accept our new products. Although we own certain patents and trademarks that we consider to be of importance, we do not believe that our business and competitiveness as a whole are dependent on any one of our patents or trademarks or on patent or trademark protection generally.

Backlog

Backlog was approximately $114,000,000$86.6 million at February 16, 200712, 2010 and also was approximately $79,000,000$77.6 million at February 20, 2006.13, 2009. We do not believe that our backlog at any point in time is indicative of future operating results.results and we expect our entire current backlog to be converted to sales in 2010.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006,2009, our wholly-owned and majority-owned domestic and foreign operations employed approximately 8,3005,900 people. None of our employees in North America or China are covered by collective bargaining agreements. In some European countries our employees are subject to the traditional national collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our employee relations are good.

In June 2006, we notified the employees of Tianjin Tanggu Watts Valve Co. Ltd., our 60% owned joint venture in Tianjin, China, that the Chinese government had informed us of its decision to take over the land on which the facility is located by eminent domain by December 31, 2007. As a result, we informed the employees that we would be required to close the facility and relocate its operations. In response, the employees commenced an unauthorized strike and demanded, among other things, certain


severance benefits in connection with the shut down of the facility. We and our joint venture partner negotiated an agreement with the striking workers to provide the employees of the facility with severance and other benefits in connection with the shut down of the facility and the employees returned to work. The strike resulted in a work stoppage that lasted approximately four weeks.

Available Information

We maintain a website with the addresswww.wattswater.com. The information contained on our website is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than an investor’sinvestor's own internet access charges, we make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Certifications

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have provided the certifications required by rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, an annual chief executive officer certification was submitted by our chief executive officer to the New York Stock Exchange on May 8, 2006 in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements.


Executive Officers and Directors

Set forth below are the names of our executive officers and directors, their respective ages and positions with our Company and a brief summary of their business experience for at least the past five years:

Name
AgePosition

Name  J. Dennis Cawte

59Group Managing Director, Europe

David J. Coghlan


50

AgeChief Operating Officer

Position

Ernest E. Elliott


58

Executive Vice President of Marketing

Michael P. Flanders


51

President, Asia

Kenneth R. Lepage


39

General Counsel, Executive Vice President of Administration and Secretary

William C. McCartney


55

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Patrick S. O’KeefeO'Keefe


57

54

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

William D. MartinoRobert L. Ayers(1)(3)


64

60

Chief Operating Officer and President of North American and Asian Operations

Director

William C. McCartneyKennett F. Burnes(1)(3)


67

52

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Director

Richard J. Dennis CawteCarthcart(2)(3)


65

56

Group Managing Director Europe

Ernest E. ElliottTimothy P. Horne


71

55

Executive Vice President of Marketing

Director

Paul A. Lacourciere

51

Executive Vice President of Manufacturing

Lynn A. McVay

39

Executive Vice President of Sales and President of the Retail Division

Gregory J. Michaud

45

Executive Vice President of Human Resources

Lester J. Taufen

63

General Counsel,Vice President of Legal Affairs and Secretary

Douglas T. White

62

Group Vice President

Robert L. Ayers (1)(3)

61

Director

Timothy P. Horne

68

Director

Ralph E. Jackson Jr.(2)(3)


68

65

Director

Kenneth J. McAvoy (1)McAvoy(1)(3)


69

66

Director

John K. McGillicuddy (1)McGillicuddy(1)(3)


66

63

Director

Gordon W. Moran (2)Moran(2)(3)


71

68

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board and Director

Daniel J. Murphy, III (2)III(2)(3)


68

65

Director


(1)
Member of the Audit Committee



(2)
Member of the Compensation Committee



(3)
Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Patrick S. O’Keefe joined our Company in 2002. Prior to joining our Company, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Industrial Distribution Group, a supplier of maintenance, repair, operating and production products, from 1999 to 2001. He was Chief Executive Officer of Zep Manufacturing, a unit of National Service Industries and a manufacturer of specialty chemicals throughout North America, Europe and Australia, from 1997 to 1999. He also held various senior management positions with Crane Co. from 1994 to 1997.

William D. Martino joined our Company in October 2005. Prior to joining our Company, he served as President of the Cooper Power Systems Division of Cooper Industries, a manufacturer of electrical enclosures, lighting and wiring devices used in hazardous locations, from 1994 through December 2004. He was Vice President, Operations of the Crouse Hinds Division of Cooper Industries from 1989 until 1994.


He also served as president of the McEvoy-Willis Division of Smith International from 1981 to 1989 and held various positions with General Electric Company from 1972 to 1981.

William C. McCartney joined our Company in 1985 as Controller. He was appointed our Vice President of Finance in 1994 and served as our Corporate Controller from 1988 to 1999. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in 2000. He served as Secretary of the Company from January 2000 to November 2005.

J. Dennis Cawte joined our Company in 2001 and was appointed Group Managing Director, Europe. Prior to joining our Company, he was European President of PCC Valve and Controls, a division of Precision Castparts Corp., a manufacturer of components and castings to the aeronautical industry, from 1999 to 2001. He had also worked for approximately 20 years for Keystone Valve International, a manufacturer and distributor of industrial valves, where his most recent position was the Managing Director Northern Europe, Middle East, Africa and India.

David J. Coghlan was appointed Chief Operating Officer in January 2010. He originally joined our Company in June 2008 as President of North America and Asia. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Coghlan served as Vice President, Global Parts for Trane Inc., a global manufacturer of commercial and residential heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, from April 2004 through May 2008. He also held several management positions within the Climate Control Technologies segment of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a manufacturer of transport temperature control units and refrigerated display merchandisers, from 1995 to December 2003. Before joining Ingersoll-Rand, Mr. Coghlan worked for several years with the management consulting firm of McKinsey & Co. in both the United Kingdom and United States.


Ernest E. Elliott joined our Company in 1986 and has served in a variety of sales and marketing roles. He was appointed Vice President of Sales in 1991, served as Executive Vice President of Wholesale Sales and Marketing from 1996 to March 2003, Executive Vice President of Wholesale Marketing from March 2003 to February 2006 and as Executive Vice President of Marketing since February 2006. Mr. Elliott temporarily assumed responsibilities of our former Chief Operating Officer and President of North American and Asian Operations in September 2007. Prior to joining our Company, he was Vice President of BTR Inc.’s's Valve Group, a diversified manufacturer of industrial and commercial valve products.

Paul A. LacourciereMichael P. Flanders joined our Company in 1986. He became Vice President of New Hampshire operations in 1989. He also served our wholly-owned subsidiary Watts Regulator Co.October 2007 as Executive Vice President of Manufacturing from 1991 to 1993, Executive Vice President from 1993 to 1995Operations, North America and President from 1995 to 1997.Asia. He was appointed CorporatePresident, Asia in 2009. From August 2005 to July 2007, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Aavid Thermalloy, LLC, an international manufacturing company providing thermal management solutions to the computer and electronics industries. From July 2003 to April 2005, he was Vice President and General Manager of ManufacturingWaukesha Bearings Corporation, a manufacturer of ourhydrodynamic and active magnetic bearings and a subsidiary of Dover Corporation. From November 1998 to July 2003, he was General Manager of the LCN Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, which manufactured mechanical and electronic door control products.

Kenneth R. Lepage was appointed General Counsel and Secretary of the Company in 1997August 2008 and Executive Vice President of ManufacturingAdministration in February 2006.

Lynn A. McVayDecember 2009. Mr. Lepage originally joined our Company in MarchSeptember 2003 as Executive Vice President of Wholesale Sales. In October 2005, he was appointed President of the Retail DivisionAssistant General Counsel and in February 2006 became Executive Vice President of Sales and President of the Retail Division.Assistant Secretary. Prior to joining our Company, he was a junior partner at the Vice Presidentlaw firm of SalesHale and Marketing for Little Giant Pump Company, a water pump manufacturing companyDorr LLP (now Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tecumseh Products Company, from 1997 to March 2003.Dorr LLP).

Gregory J. MichaudWilliam C. McCartney joined our Company in April 20061985 as ExecutiveController. He was appointed our Vice President of Human Resources.Finance in 1994 and served as our Corporate Controller from 1988 to 1999. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in 2000. He served as Secretary of the Company from January 2000 to November 2005.

Patrick S. O'Keefe joined our Company in 2002. Prior to joining our Company, he served as Vice President, Human ResourcesChief Executive Officer and Director of the Compact Equipment divisionIndustrial Distribution Group, a supplier of Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a diversified industrial companymaintenance, repair, operating and production products, from June 2003 through March 2006. He served as Vice President, Human Resources of the Productivity Solutions division of Ingersoll-Rand from January 20031999 to June 2003 and as Director, Human Resources & Corporate Organizational Planning of Ingersoll-Rand from June 2000 to December 2002.

Lester J. Taufen joined our Company in 1999 as Associate Corporate Counsel.2001. He was appointed General Counsel, Vice PresidentChief Executive Officer of Legal AffairsZep Manufacturing, a unit of National Service Industries and Assistant Secretary in January 2000. He was appointed Secretary in November 2005. Prior to joining our Company, he was employed for 13 years at Elf Atochema manufacturer of specialty chemicals throughout North America, a chemical manufacturing company, serving as Senior Counsel.Europe and Australia, from 1997 to 1999. He also held various senior management positions with Crane Co. from 1994 to 1997.

Douglas T. White joined our Company in 2001 as Group Vice President. Prior to joining our Company he was employed by Honeywell International, Inc., a diversified technology and manufacturing company, as Vice President of Marketing—Consumer Products Group from 1998 to 2001.

Robert L. Ayers has served as a director of our Company since October 2006. He was Senior Vice President of ITT Industries and President of ITT Industries’Industries' Fluid Technology from October 1999 until September 2005. Mr. Ayers continued to be employed by ITT Industries from September 2005 until his


retirement in September 2006, during which time he focused on special projects for the company. Mr. Ayers originally joined ITT Industries in 1998 as President of ITT Industries’Industries' Industrial Pump Group. Before joining ITT Industries, Mr. Ayershe was President of Sulzer Industrial USA and Chief Executive Officer of Sulzer Bingham, a pump manufacturer. He is a director of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.

Kennett F. Burnes became a director of our Company in February 2009. Mr. Burnes is the retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cabot Corporation, a global specialty chemicals company. He was Chairman from 2001 to March 2008, President from 1995 to January 2008 and Chief Executive Officer from 2001 to January 2008. Prior to joining Cabot Corporation in 1987, Mr. Burnes was a partner at the Boston-based law firm of Choate, Hall & Stewart, where he specialized in corporate and business law for nearly 20 years. He is a director of State Street Corporation, a member of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute's Board of Trustees and a board member of the New England Conservatory. Mr. Burnes is also Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Schepens Eye Research Institute.


Richard J. Cathcart has served as a director of our Company since October 2007. He was Vice Chairman and a member of the Board of Directors of Pentair, Inc. from February 2005 until his retirement in September 2007. Pentair is a diversified manufacturing company consisting of two operating segments: Water Technologies and Technical Products. He was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of Pentair's Water Technologies Group in January 2001 and served in that capacity until his appointment as Vice Chairman in February 2005. He began his career at Pentair in March 1995 as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development, where he identified water as a strategic area of growth. In February 1996, he was named Executive Vice President and President of Pentair's Water Technologies Group. Prior to joining Pentair, he held several management and business development positions during his 20-year career with Honeywell International Inc. He is a director of Fluidra S.A.

Timothy P. Horne has served as a director of our Company since 1962. He became an employee of our Company in 1959 and served as our President from 1976 to 1978, from 1994 to 1997 and from 1999 to 2002. He served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1978 to 2002, and he served as Chairman of our Board of Directors from 1986 to 2002. He retired as an employee of our Company on December 31, 2002. Since his retirement, Mr. Hornehe has continued to serve our Company as a consultant.

Ralph E. Jackson, Jr. has served as a director of our Company since 2004. He worked for Cooper Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of electrical products, from 1985 until his retirement in December 2003. Prior to joining Cooper Industries, Mr. Jacksonhe worked for the Bussmann and Air Comfort divisions of McGraw-Edison from 1976 until McGraw-Edison was acquired by Cooper Industries in 1985. While with Cooper Industries, Mr. Jacksonhe served as Chief Operating Officer from 2000 to December 2003, Executive Vice President, Electrical Operations from 1992 to 2000, and President, Bussmann Division from the time McGraw-Edison was acquired by Cooper Industries to 1992. Mr. JacksonHe served as a member of the Board of Directors of Cooper Industries from 2000 to December 2003.

Kenneth J. McAvoy has served as a director of our Company since 1994. He was Controller of our Company from 1981 to 19861985 and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from 1986 to 1999. He also served as Vice President of Finance from 1984 to 1994; Executive Vice President of European Operations from 1994 to 1996; and Secretary from 1985 to 1999. He retired from our Company on December 31, 1999.

John K. McGillicuddy has served as a director of our Company since 2003. He was employed by KPMG LLP, a public accounting firm, from 1965 until his retirement in 2000. He was elected into the Partnership at KPMG LLP in June 1975 where he served as Audit Partner, SEC Reviewing Partner, Partner-in-Charge of Professional Practice, Partner-in-Charge of College Recruiting and Partner-in-Charge of Staff Scheduling. He is a director of Brooks Automation, Inc. and Cabot Corporation.

Gordon W. Moran has served as a director of our Company since 1990. He has been the Chairman of Hollingsworth & Vose Company, a paper manufacturer, since 1997, and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 1983 to 1998.

Daniel J. Murphy, III has served as a director of our Company since 1986. He has been the Chairman of Northmark Bank, a commercial bank he founded, since 1987. Prior to forming Northmark Bank in 1987, he was a Managing Director of Knightsbridge Partners, a venture capital firm, from January to August 1987, and President and a director of Arltru Bancorporation, a bank holding company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Arlington Trust Company, from 1980 to 1986.


Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters

We are subject to a variety of potential liabilities connected with our business operations, including potential liabilities and expenses associated with possible product defects or failures and compliance with environmental laws. We maintain product liability and other insurance coverage, which we believe to be generally in accordance with industry practices. Nonetheless, such insurance coverage may not be adequate to protect us fully against substantial damage claims.


Contingencies

James Jones Litigation

On June 25, 1997,        As has been previously disclosed, we were party to a lawsuit filed by Nora Armenta in California Superior Court against us, James Jones Company, Mueller Co. and Tyco International (the Relator)"Armenta case") and a separate lawsuit filed in California Superior Court on behalf of the City of Banning, California and 42 other cities and water districts in California against us, James Jones Company and Mueller Co. (the "City of Banning case"). At a civil action inmediation session held with the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County (theon June 9-10, 2009, the parties to the Armenta case) againstcase and the City of Banning case agreed in principle to settle both cases. The agreement in principle was effective and binding only upon approval by the plaintiffs in the Armenta and City of Banning cases, and final approval of the settlement by the California Superior Court after a fairness hearing. An agreement in principle also was reached to settle the related insurance coverage casesWatts Industries, Inc. vs. Zurich American Insurance Company, et al., andZurich American Insurance Company vs. Watts Industries, Inc., et al., pending in California Superior Court; andZurich American Insurance Company vs. Watts Industries, Inc. and James Jones Company (James Jones), Mueller Co., Tyco International (U.S.), andpending in the Company. We formerly owned James Jones.United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Relator filed under the qui tam provisionsettlement of the California state False Claims Act, Cal. Govt. Code § 12650 et seq. (California False Claims Act)insurance coverage cases was effective and generally alleged that James Jones and the other defendants violated this statute by delivering some “defective” or “non-conforming” waterworks parts to thirty-four municipal water systems in the State of California. The Relator filed a First Amended Complaint in November 1998 and a Second Amended Complaint in December 2000, which brought the total number of plaintiffs to 161. To date, 11binding upon approval of the named cities have intervened, and attempts by four other named cities to intervene have been denied.

In June 2002, the trial court excluded 47 cities from this December 2000 total of 161, but this exclusion was reversed by an August 30, 2006 California Court of Appeal ruling that is now final. This August 30, 2006 Court of Appeal ruling also reversed dismissals of Tyco International and Mueller Co., and this allowed the Relator to make a timely motion that would remove the Armenta Case litigation from Judge Lichtman’s court to another complex litigation judge’s court.

Onesettlement of the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint and the Complaints-in-Intervention is that purchased non-conforming James Jones waterworks parts may leach into public drinking water elevated amounts of lead that may create a public health risk because they were made out of ‘81 bronze alloy (UNS No. C8440) and contain more lead than the specified and advertised ‘85 bronze alloy (UNS No. C83600). This contention is based on the average difference of about 2% lead content between ‘81 bronze (6% to 8% lead) and ‘85 bronze (4% to 6% lead) and the assumption that this would mean increased consumable lead in public drinking water that could cause a public health concern. We believe the evidence and discovery available to date indicates that this is not the case.

In addition, ‘81 bronze is used extensively in municipal and home plumbing systems and is approved by municipal, local and national codes. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency also defines metal for pipe fittings with no more than 8% lead as “lead free” under Section 1417 of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act.

In this case, the Relator seeks three times an unspecified amount of actual damages and alleges that the municipalities have suffered hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. She also seeks civil penalties of $10,000 for each false claim and alleges that defendants are responsible for tens of thousands of false claims. Finally, the Relator requests an award of costs of this action, including attorneys’ fees.

In December 1998, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) intervened in thisunderlying Armenta case and filed a complaint. We settled with the city of Los Angeles, by far the most significant city, for $7,300,000 plus attorneys’ fees. Co-defendants contributed $2,000,000 toward this settlement.

In August 2003, an additional settlement payment was made for $13,000,000 ($11,000,000 from us and $2,000,000 from James Jones), which settled the claims of the three Phase I cities (Santa Monica, San Francisco and East Bay Municipal Utility District) chosen by the Relator as having the strongest claims to be tried first. This settlement payment included the Relator’s statutory share, and the claims of these three cities have been dismissed. In addition to this $13,000,000 payment, we are obligated to pay the Relator’s attorney’s fees.

After the Phase I settlement, the Court permitted the defendants to select five additional cities to serve as the plaintiffs in a second trial phase of the case. Contra Costa, Corona, Santa Ana, Santa Cruz and Vallejo were chosen. The Company and James Jones then reached an agreement to settle the claims of the City of Santa Ana for a total of $45,000, an amount which approximates Santa Ana’s purchases of JamesBanning case as described above.


Jones products during the relevant period.        The Santa Ana settlement agreement was approved by the plaintiffs in both the Armenta and City of Banning cases and, at the fairness hearing held on November 5, 2009, the California Superior Court and then completed.

On June 22, 2005,approved the Court dismissed the claimssettlement of the remaining Phase II cities (Contra Costa, Corona, Santa CruzArmenta case and Vallejo). The Court ruled thatCity of Banning case. There were no objectors to the Relator and these cities were required to show thatsettlement. Based on the cities had received out of spec parts which were related to specific invoices and that this showing had not been made. Although each city’s claim is unique, this ruling is significant for the claimscontemporaneous final settlement of the remaining cities,underlying insurance coverage cases, our contribution to the settlement was $15.3 million. As a result of the settlements, all lawsuits and all claims were dismissed. In addition, separate from the settlement, we paid our outside counsel an additional $5.0 million for services rendered in connection with the above described litigation.

        As a result of the settlement of the above described litigation, we recorded a non-cash, pre-tax gain in discontinued operations of approximately $9.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 to reduce previously recorded estimates of the loss and related fees to the amounts noted above.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigation

        In July 2009, we received information that employees of CWV, at that time an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in China, made payments to employees of state-owned agencies. Such payments may violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We are conducting an investigation utilizing outside counsel and voluntarily disclosed this matter to the United States Department of Justice and the Relator has appealed. Litigation is inherently uncertain,Securities and we are unable toExchange Commission. We cannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

On September 15, 2004, the Relator’s attorneys filed a new common law fraud lawsuit in the California Superior Court for the City of Banning and forty-five other cities and water districts against James Jones, Watts and Mueller Co. based on the same transactions alleged in the Armenta case. About thirty-four of the plaintiffs inmatter at this new lawsuit are also plaintiffs in the Armenta case. On January 4, 2006, the Court denied much of the defendants’ demurrer, which had been filed on claim-splitting and statute of limitations grounds. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and we are unable to predict the outcome of this new lawsuit.

We have a reserve of approximately $26,000,000 with respect to the James Jones Litigation in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. We believe, on the basis of all available information, that this reserve is adequate to cover the probable and reasonably estimable losses resulting from the Armenta case and the insurance coverage litigation with Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) discussed below. We are currently unable to make an estimate of the range of any additional losses.

On February 14, 2001, after our insurers had denied coverage for the claims in the Armenta case, we filed a complaint for coverage against our insurers in the California Superior Court (the coverage case). James Jones filed a similar complaint, the cases were consolidated, and the trial court made summary adjudication rulings that Zurich must pay all reasonable defense costs incurred by us and James Jones in the Armenta case since April 23, 1998 as well as such defense costs in the future until the end of the Armenta case. In July 2004, the California Court of Appeal affirmed these rulings, and, on December 1, 2004, the California Supreme Court denied Zurich’s appeal of this decision. This denial permanently established Zurich’s obligation to pay Armenta defense costs for both us (approximately $16,600,000 plus future costs) and James Jones (which we estimate to be $17,000,000 plus future costs), and Zurich is currently making payments of incurred Armenta defense costs. However, as noted below, Zurich asserts that the defense costs paid bytime or whether it are subject to reimbursement.

On November 22, 2002, the trial court made a summary adjudication ruling that Zurich must indemnify and pay us and James Jones for amounts paid to settle with the City of Los Angeles. Zurich’s attempt to obtain appellate review of this order was denied, but Zurich will still be able to appeal this order at the end of the coverage case. On August 6, 2004, the trial court made another summary adjudication ruling that Zurich must indemnify and pay us and James Jones for the $13,000,000 paid to settle the claims of the Phase I cities described above. Zurich’s attempt to obtain appellate review of this ruling was denied on December 3, 2004 by the California Court of Appeal, but Zurich will still be able to appeal this order at the end of the coverage case. Zurich has now made most of the payments required by these indemnity orders.

On February 8, 2006, Zurich filed a motion to set aside as void the November 22, 2002 and August 6, 2004 summary adjudication indemnity payment orders. After this motion was denied, Zurich appealed and this appeal is not yet resolved. We are currently unable to predict the finality of these indemnity payment orders since Zurich can also appeal them at the end of the coverage case. We have recorded reimbursed indemnity settlement amounts (but not reimbursed defense costs) as a liability pending court resolution of the indemnification matter as it relates to Zurich.


Zurich has asserted that all amounts (which we estimate to be $51,000,000 for both defense costs and indemnity amounts paid for settlements) paid by it to us and James Jones are subject to reimbursement under Deductible Agreements related to the insurance policies between Zurich and Watts. If Zurich were to prevail on this argument, James Jones would have a possible indemnity claim against us for its exposure from the Armenta case. We believe the Armenta case should be viewed as one occurrence and the deductible amount should be $500,000 per occurrence.

These reimbursement claims are subject to arbitration under the Watts/Zurich Deductible Agreements. Zurich claims its reimbursement right for defense costs paid arises under six Deductible Agreements, and we contend that only two Deductible Agreements apply. We further contend that a final decision in California supports our position on the number of Deductible Agreements that should apply to defense costs. On January 31, 2006, the federal district court in Chicago, Illinois determined that there are disputes under all Deductible Agreements in effect during the period in which Zurich issued primary policies and that the arbitrator could decide which agreements would control reimbursement claims. We appealed this ruling. On October 20, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed that an arbitration panel could decide which deductible agreements between Zurich and us would control Zurich’s reimbursement claim for defense costs paid in the James Jones case. As a result of this development, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $5,000,000 to discontinued operations in 2006.

Based on management’s assessment, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of the James Jones Litigation will have a materialmaterially adverse effectimpact on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. While this assessment is based on all available information, litigation is inherently uncertain, the actual liability to us to resolve this litigation fully cannot be predicted with any certainty and there exists a reasonable possibility that we may ultimately incur lossesWe sold CWV in the James Jones Litigation in excess of the amount accrued. We intend to continue to contest vigorously all aspects of the James Jones Litigation.January 2010.

Environmental Remediation

We have been named as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to a limited number of identified contaminated sites. The levels of contamination vary significantly from site to site as do the related levels of remediation efforts. Environmental liabilities are recorded based on the most probable cost, if known, or on the estimated minimum cost of remediation. We accrue estimated environmental liabilities based on assumptions, which are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties.



Circumstances which can affect the reliability and precision of these estimates include identification of additional sites, environmental regulations, level of cleanup required, technologies available, number and financial condition of other contributors to remediation and the time period over which remediation may occur. We recognize changes in estimates as new remediation requirements are defined or as new information becomes available. At December 31, 2006, we have a reserve of approximately $1,400,000 (environmental accrual), which we estimate will likely be paid for environmental remediation liabilities over the next five to ten years.

        Based on the facts currently known to us, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. Some of our environmental matters are inherently uncertain and there exists a possibility that we may ultimately incur losses from these matters in excess of the amount accrued. However, we cannot currently estimate the amount of any such additional losses.

Asbestos Litigation

We are defending approximately 104 cases105 lawsuits in different jurisdictions, with the greatest number filed primarily, but not exclusively, in Mississippi and New JerseyCalifornia state courts, alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos. These filingsThe complaints in these cases typically name multiplea large number of defendants and are filed on behalf of many plaintiffs. They do not identify any particular Watts products as a source of asbestos exposure. To date, we have been dismissed from eachobtained a dismissal in every case when the scheduledbefore it has reached trial date comes near or whenbecause discovery failshas failed to yield any evidence of substantial exposure to any of our


Watts products. Based on the facts currently known to us, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Other Litigation

On or about March 26, 2003, a class action complaint was filed against us by North Carolina Hospitality Group, Inc. in the Circuit Court of Maryland, Prince George’s County. It alleges that certain commercial valve models contain a design defect that causes them to fail prematurely. On June 7, 2004, the trial court issued an opinion and order that denied the plaintiff’s request for class certification. This ruling was appealed at the end of 2004, and on January 17, 2006, this ruling was affirmed by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. A release has been obtained from the plaintiff and this matter has now been successfully concluded.

Other lawsuits and proceedings or claims, arising from the ordinary course of operations, are also pending or threatened against us. Based on the facts currently known to us, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these other litigation matters will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

16




Item 1A.    RISK FACTORSFACTORS.

.Current economic cycles, particularly reduced levels of commercial and residential starts and remodeling, may continue to have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.

        We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in revenues and operating results due to economic and business cycles. The businesses of most of our customers, particularly plumbing and heating wholesalers and home improvement retailers, are cyclical. Therefore, the level of our business activity has been cyclical, fluctuating with economic cycles. The current economic downturn may also affect the financial stability of our customers, which could affect their ability to pay amounts owed vendors, including us. We also believe our level of business activity is influenced by commercial and residential starts and renovation and remodeling, which are, in turn, heavily influenced by interest rates, consumer debt levels, changes in disposable income, employment growth and consumer confidence. The current credit market conditions may prevent commercial and residential builders or developers from obtaining the necessary capital to continue existing projects or to start new projects. This may result in the delay or cancellation of orders from our customers or potential customers and may adversely affect our revenues and our ability to manage inventory levels, collect customer receivables and maintain profitability. The current conditions in the housing and debt markets have caused a significant reduction in commercial and residential starts and renovation and remodeling. These conditions have caused a decrease in our revenue and profit. If these conditions continue or worsen in the future, our revenues and profits could decrease and could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to make large acquisitions may be limited due to the current credit market conditions.

        As widely reported, the financial markets worldwide have been experiencing, among other things, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability. One of our strategies is to increase our revenues



and profitability and expand our business through acquisitions. We may require capital in excess of our available cash and the unused portion of our revolving credit facility to make large acquisitions, which we would generally obtain from access to the credit markets. However, the current economic environment may adversely affect the availability and cost of credit in the future. There can be no assurance that if a large acquisition is identified that we would have access to sufficient capital to complete such acquisition.

We face intense competition and, if we are not able to respond to competition in our markets, our revenues may decrease.

Competitive pressures in our markets could adversely affect our competitive position, leading to a possible loss of market share or a decrease in prices, either of which could result in decreased revenues and profits. We encounter intense competition in all areas of our business. Additionally, customers forwe believe our productscustomers are attempting to reduce the number of vendors from which they purchase in order to reduce the size and diversity of their inventories and their transaction costs. To remain competitive, we will need to invest continually in manufacturing, marketing, customer service and support and our distribution networks. We may not have sufficient resources to continue to make such investments and we may be unable to maintain our competitive position. In addition, we anticipate that we may have to reduce the prices of some of our products to stay competitive, potentially resulting in a reduction in the profit margin for, and inventory valuation of, these products. Some of our competitors are based in foreign countries and have cost structures and prices in foreign currencies. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause our U.S. dollar-priced products to be less competitive than our competitors’competitors' products which are priced in other currencies.

Reductions or interruptions in the supply of raw materials and increasesChanges in the costs of raw materials could reduce our profit margins andmargins. Reductions or interruptions in the supply of components or finished goods from international sources could adversely affect our ability to meet our customer delivery commitments.

We require substantial amounts of raw materials, including bronze, brass, cast iron, steel and plastic and substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from outside sources. The availability and costs of raw materials may be subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, interruptions in production by suppliers and changes in exchange rates and worldwide price and demand levels. We typically do not enter into long-term supply agreements. Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials for our products at favorable costs or at all, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations by decreasing our profit margins and by hindering our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis. During 2006,margins. The commodity markets have experienced tremendous volatility over the costspast several years, particularly copper. The market prices of many commodities decreased during the latter half of these raw materials were at the highest levels that they have been in many years. We may2008, but increased significantly during 2009 and into February 2010. Should commodity costs continue to experience further cost increases of these materials. In  2006, cost increases in raw materials wereincrease substantially, we may not completely recovered by increased selling prices or other product cost reductions. If we are notbe able to reduce or eliminate the effect of these cost increasescompletely recover such costs, through lowering other costs of production or successfully implementingselling price increases to our customers suchor other product cost increases from our vendors could continue toreductions, which would have a negative effect on our financial results. Additionally, we continue to purchase increased levels of components and finished productgoods from international sources. If there is an interruptionIn limited cases, these components or finished goods are single-sourced. The availability of components and finished goods from international sources could be adversely impacted by, among other things, interruptions in delivering these finishedproduction by suppliers, suppliers' allocations to other purchasers and new laws or regulations. This could impact our ability to deliver products to our domestic warehouses, this could havecustomers on a negative effect on our financial results.timely basis.

Implementation of our acquisition strategy may not be successful, which could affect our ability to increase our revenues or our profitability.

One of our strategies is to increase our revenues and profitability and expand our marketsbusiness through acquisitions that will provide us with complementary water-related products and increase market share for our existing product lines. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional companies or successfully integrate such additional companies without substantial costs, delays or other problems. Also, companies acquired recently and in the future may not achieve revenues, profitability or cash flows that justify our investment in them. In 2009, we



recorded losses associated with the fairly recent CWV and TEAM acquisitions, resulting from their pending disposal and liquidation, respectively. We expect to spend significant time and effort in expanding our existing businesses and identifying, completing and integrating acquisitions. In particular, we expect that management will continue to devote a significant amount of time and effort in 2007 to improve the operational results of our recently acquired subsidiary, Core Industries Inc., including improvements in its profitability, customer satisfaction and revenue growth rate. If we are not successful in


implementing these improvements, our financial results may be negatively affected. We have faced increasing competition for acquisition candidates which have resulted in significant increases in the purchase prices of many acquisition candidates. This competition, and the resulting purchase price increases, may limit the number of acquisition opportunities available to us, possibly leading to a decrease in the rate of growth of our revenues and profitability. In addition, acquisitions may involve a number of special risks, including, but not limited to:

    ·inadequate internal controls over financial reporting and our ability to bring such controls into compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in a timely manner;

    ·

    adverse short-term effects on our reported operating results;

    ·

    diversion of management’smanagement's attention;

    ·

    investigations of, or challenges to, acquisitions by competition authorities;

    ·

    loss of key personnel at acquired companies; and

    ·

    unanticipated management or operational problems or legal liabilities.

We are subject to risks related to product defects, which could result in product recalls and could subject us to warranty claims in excess of our warranty provisions or which are greater than anticipated due to the unenforceability of liability limitations.

We maintain strict quality controls and procedures, including the testing of raw materials and safety testing of selected finished products. However, we cannot be certain that our testing will reveal latent defects in our products or the materials from which they are made, which may not become apparent until after the products have been sold into the market. We also cannot be certain that our suppliers will always eliminate latent defects in products we purchase from them. Accordingly, there is a risk that product defects will occur, which could require a product recall. Product recalls can be expensive to implement and, if a product recall occurs during the product’sproduct's warranty period, we may be required to replace the defective product. In addition, a product recall may damage our relationship with our customers and we may lose market share with our customers. Our insurance policies may not cover the costs of a product recall.

Our standard warranties contain limits on damages and exclusions of liability for consequential damages and for misuse, improper installation, alteration, accident or mishandling while in the possession of someone other than us. We record an accrual for estimated warranty costs at the time revenue is recognized. We may incur additional operating expenses if our warranty provision does not reflect the actual cost of resolving issues related to defects in our products. If these additional expenses are significant, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We face risks from product liability and other lawsuits, which may adversely affect our business.

We have been and mayexpect to continue to be subject to various product liability claims or other lawsuits, including, among others, that our products include inadequate or improper instructions for use or installation, or inadequate warnings concerning the effects of the failure of our products. In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification, damages from these claims would have to be paid from our assets and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. We, like other manufacturers and distributors of products designed to control and regulate fluids and gases, face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims and other lawsuits in the event that the use of our products results in personal injury, property damage or business interruption to our customers. Although we maintain strict quality controls and procedures, including the testing of raw materials and safety testing of selected finished products, we cannot be certain that our products will be completely free from defect. In addition, in certain cases,



we rely on third-party manufacturers for our


products or components of our products. Although we have product liability and general insurance coverage, we cannot be certain that this insurance coverage will continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or, if available, will be adequate to cover any such liabilities. For more information, see “Item"Item 1. Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters."

Down economic cycles, particularly reduced levels of residential and non-residential starts and remodeling, could have an adverse effect on our revenues and operating results.

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in revenues and operating results due to economic and business cycles. The businesses of most of our customers, particularly plumbing and heating wholesalers and home improvement retailers, are cyclical. Therefore, the level of our business activity has been cyclical, fluctuating with economic cycles. We also believe our level of business activity is influenced by residential and non-residential starts and renovation and remodeling, which are, in turn, heavily influenced by interest rates, consumer debt levels, changes in disposable income, employment growth and consumer confidence. If these and other factors cause a material reduction in residential and non-residential and remodeling starts, our revenues and profits would decrease and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Economic and other risks associated with international sales and operations could adversely affect our business and future operating results.

Since we sell and manufacture our products worldwide, our business is subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. Our business and future operating results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

Fluctuations in foreign exchange rates could materially affect our reported results.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies, as a portion of our sales and certain portions of our costs, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Approximately 38.0%45.1% of our sales during the year ended December 31, 20062009 were from sales outside of the U.S. compared to 37.0%44.2% for the year ended December 31, 2005.2008. For the year ended December 31, 2006,2009, the depreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar had a negative impact on sales of approximately $17.7 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. In 2008, the appreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar had a positive impact on sales of approximately $7,107,000. For$30.2 million compared to 2007. There were also minor impacts on sales in other European currencies such as the year ended December 31, 2005 the depreciation of the europound sterling and Danish krone against the U.S. dollar had a negative impact on sales of approximately $2,857,000.dollar. Additionally, our Canadian operations require significant amounts of U.S. purchases for their operations. Instead of buying or manufacturing domestically, we currently have a favorable cost structure for certain goods we source from our joint venture, our wholly-owned subsidiaries in China and our outside vendors. In 2005, China revalued its currency higher againstAlthough the U.S. dollar and


stated it would no longer tievalue of the yuan to a fixed rate against the U.S. currency. The yuan was valuedunchanged at 7.80 and 8.07 at6.8 from December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. China also stated it will peg2008 to December 31, 2009, history has shown that when the currency does float, changes of up to 15% have occurred. Although there are currently no indicators that the yuan against numerous currencies, although it will keepappreciate or depreciate in the yuannear term, any decision by the Chinese government to manage their currency in a tight band rather than letting it trade freely.different manner could result in additional volatility to the Company. The spot rate of the euro and Canadian dollar and yuan increased in value fromas of December 31, 20052008 to December 31, 20062009 by approximately 11%, 1%3% and 3%16%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar.dollar, while the yuan remained flat. If our share of revenue and purchases in non-dollar denominated currencies continues to increase in future periods, exchange rate fluctuations will likelymay have a greater impact on our results of operations and financial condition.



There are risksOur ability to achieve savings through our restructuring plans may be adversely affected by local regulations or factors beyond the control of management.

        We implemented restructuring plans in expanding our manufacturing operations and acquiring companies in China.

As part of our strategy, we are shifting a portion of our manufacturing operations to China to reduce our production costs and to sell product into the Chinese market. This shift will subject a greater portion of our operations to the risks of doing business in China. In addition, we have increased our participation in the Chinese water and power infrastructure markets with our recent acquisition of Changsha Valve Works. Changsha sells exclusively into the domestic Chinese marketplace and enters into long-term sales contracts. The increased production levels in China require increased levels of working capital as we are rapidly increasing headcount and manufacturing equipment. If we are unable to quickly train these new employees we may experience product quality issues. The Chinese central and local government authorities have a higher degree of control over our businesses in China than is customary in many of the countries in which we operate, and  this makes the process of obtaining necessary regulatory approval in China inherently unpredictable. For instance, the local Chinese authorities in Tianjin, China informed us that property occupied by our TWT joint venture will be taken over by eminent domain by December 31, 2007 and we will incur significant costs in connection with the relocation of our operations there. In addition, the protection accorded our proprietary technology2009 and know-how under the Chinese legal system is not as strong asannounced a new restructuring plan for France in the United States and, as a result, we may lose valuable trade secrets and competitive advantage.

If we cannot continue operating our manufacturing facilities at current or higher utilization levels, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

The equipment and management systems necessary for the operation of our manufacturing facilities may break down, perform poorly or fail, resulting in fluctuations in our ability to manufacture our products and to achieve manufacturing efficiencies. We operate2010. Management's plans include a number of manufacturing facilities, all of whichsteps that we believe are subjectnecessary to this risk, and such fluctuations at any of these facilities could cause an increase in our productionreduce operating costs and a corresponding decrease inincrease efficiencies throughout our profitability. We alsomanufacturing, sales and distribution footprint. Although we have a vertically-integrated manufacturing process. Each segment is dependent uponconsidered the prior processimpact of local regulations, negotiations with employee representatives, the timing of capital expenditures necessary to prepare facilities and any breakdown in one segment will adversely affect all later components. Fluctuations in our production processthe related costs associated with these activities, factors beyond the control of management may affect our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis. Our inability to meet our delivery obligations could result in a loss of our customersthe timing and negativelytherefore affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition,when the savings will be achieved under the plans. Further, if we have an ongoing manufacturing restructuring program to reduce our manufacturing costs. As we transition more of our operations overseas as a result of the manufacturing restructuring plan, we are transferring capacity utilization. If our planned manufacturing plant consolidations in the United States and Europe and our production capability expansion in China are not successful in completing the restructuring projects in the time frames contemplated or if additional issues arise during the projects that add costs or disrupt customer service, then our operating results of operations and financial condition could be materially adverselynegatively affected.


If we experience delays in introducing new products or if our existing or new products do not achieve or maintain market acceptance and regulatory approvals, our revenues and our profitability may decrease.

Our failure to develop new and innovative products or to custom design existing products could result in the loss of existing customers to competitors or the inability to attract new business, either of which may adversely affect our revenues. Our industry is characterized by:

·       intense competition;

·       changes in specifications required by our customers, plumbing codes and/or regulatory agencies;

·       technically complex products; and

·       constant improvement to existing products and introductions of new products.

We believe our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate or adapt to these factors and to offer, on a timely basis, products that meet customer demands and the requirements of plumbing codes and/or regulatory agencies. The development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring the anticipation of technological and market trends. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties, such as an inability to attract a sufficient number of experienced engineers, that could delay or prevent our development, introduction, approval or marketing of new products or enhancements and result in unexpected expenses. Such difficulties could cause us to lose business from our customers and could adversely affect our competitive position; in addition, added expenses could decrease the profitability associated with those products that do not gain market acceptance.

Environmental compliance costs and liabilities could increase our expenses or reduce our profitability.

Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and increasingly stringent laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including laws and regulations governing air emissions, water discharges, waste management and disposal and workplace safety. Such laws and regulations can impose substantial fines and sanctions for violations and require the installation of costly pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit pollution emissions and/or decrease the likelihood of accidental hazardous substance releases. We could be required to halt one or more portions of our operations until a violation is cured. We could also be liable for the costs of property damage or personal injury to others. Although we attempt to operate in compliance with these environmental laws, we may not succeed in this effort at all times. The costs of curing violations or resolving enforcement actions that might be initiated by government authorities could be substantial.

Under certain environmental laws, the current and past owners or operators of real property may be liable for the costs of cleaning up contamination, even if they did not know of or were not responsible for such contamination. These laws also impose liability on any person who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous waste at any site. We have been named as a potentially responsible party or are otherwise conducting remedial activities with respect to a limited number of identified contaminated sites, including sites we currently own or operate. There can be no assurances that our ownership and operation of real property and our disposal of waste will not lead to other liabilities under these laws.

We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, costs relating to environmental matters. In addition, new laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new clean-up requirements could require us to incur additional costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could be significant. Environmental litigation, enforcement and compliance are inherently uncertain and we may experience significant costs in connection with environmental matters. For more information, see “Item 1. Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters.”


Third parties may infringe our intellectual property and we may expend resources enforcing our rights or suffer competitive injury.

We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and licensing arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary rights. We may be required to spend resources to monitor and police our intellectual property rights. If we fail to successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could suffer, which could harm our operating results. We have been limited from selling products from time-to-time because of existing patents.

The requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, “Goodwillto evaluate goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142)non-amortizable assets for impairment may result in a write-off of all or a portion of our goodwill,recorded amounts, which would negatively affect our operating results and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, we recorded goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets of $356,090,000$425.1 million and $50,519,000,$51.2 million, respectively. If we are required to take an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets in connection with the requirements of FAS 142, our operating results may decrease and our financial condition may be harmed. Under FAS 142, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. In lieu of amortization, we are required to perform an annual impairment review of both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets. We concludedIn performing our annual review in 2009, we recognized a non-cash pre-tax charge of approximately $3.3 million as an impairment of some of the indefinite lived intangible assets. In performing our annual goodwill review in 2008, we recognized a non-cash pre-tax charge of approximately $22.0 million as an impairment of all the goodwill value related to one reporting unit. Although we have not experienced goodwill impairment in our remaining reporting units, there can be no assurances that nofuture goodwill impairment existed at October 29, 2006, the time of our latest annual review.will not occur. We perform our annual test for indications of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets impairment in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year or sooner if indicators of impairment exist.

The loss or financial instability of a major customer could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Our largest customer, The Home Depot Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,        In 2009, our top ten customers accounted for approximately $122,700,000, or 10.0%,25% of our total net sales with no one customer accounting for the year ended December 31, 2006 and $98,500,000, or 10.7%,more than approximately 6% of our total net sales for year ended December 31, 2005.sales. Our customers generally are not obligated to purchase any minimum volume of products from us and are able to terminate their relationships with us at any time. In addition, increases in the prices of our products could result in a reduction in orders for our products from Home Depot and other customers. A significant reduction in orders from, or change in terms of contracts with, Home Depot or otherany significant customers could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations. Furthermore, some of our major customers are facing financial challenges due to market declines and heavy debt levels; should these challenges become acute, our results could be materially adversely affected due to reduced orders and/or payment delays or defaults.

Certain indebtedness may limit our ability to pay dividends, incur additional debt and make acquisitions and other investments.

Our revolving credit facility and other senior indebtedness contain operational and financial covenants that restrict our ability to make distributions to stockholders, incur additional debt and make acquisitions and other investments unless we satisfy certain financial tests and comply with various financial ratios. If we do not maintain compliance with these covenants, our creditors could declare a default under our revolving credit facility or senior notes and our indebtedness could be declared immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with the provisions of our indebtedness may be affected by changes in economic or business conditions beyond our control. Further, given the current condition of the credit markets, should we require additional debt financing above our existing credit limit, we cannot be assured such financing would be available to us or available to us on reasonable economic terms.



We are investigating potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the results of this investigation could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operations, financial condition and cash flow.

        As previously disclosed, we have received information that employees of a former subsidiary of the Company in China made payments to employees of state-owned agencies. Such payments may violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA. We are conducting an investigation utilizing outside counsel and voluntarily disclosed this matter to the United States Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. If violations are found, we may be subject to criminal and/or civil sanctions, including substantial fines. Negotiated dispositions of these types of violations also often result in an acknowledgement of wrongdoing by the entity and the appointment of a monitor on terms agreed upon with the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission to review and monitor current and future business practices with the goal of assuring future FCPA compliance. The amount of any fines or monetary penalties which could be assessed would depend on, among other factors, findings regarding the amount, timing, nature and scope of any improper payments, whether any such payments were authorized by or made with knowledge of Watts or its affiliates, the amount of gross pecuniary gain or loss involved, and the level of cooperation provided to the government authorities during the investigation. Any determination that we have violated the FCPA could result in sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, operations, financial condition and cash flow.

One of our stockholders can exercise substantial influence over our Company.

        Our Class B Common Stock entitles its holders to ten votes for each share and our Class A Common Stock entitles its holders to one vote per share. As of February 1, 2007,2010, Timothy P. Horne, a member of our board of directors, beneficially owned approximately 18.8%19.5% of our outstanding shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock (assuming conversion of all shares of Class B common stockCommon Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Horne into Class A common stock)Common Stock) and approximately 99.0% of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock,Common Stock, which represents approximately 69.3%70.2% of the total outstanding voting power. As long as Mr. Horne controls shares representing at least a majority of the total voting power of our outstanding stock, Mr. Horne will be able to unilaterally


determine the outcome of most stockholder votes, and other stockholders will not be able to affect the outcome of any such votes.

Conversion and sale of a significant number of shares of our Class B common stockCommon Stock could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.Common Stock.

As of February 1, 2007,2010, there were outstanding 31,239,11129,505,918 shares of our Class A common stockCommon Stock and 7,293,8807,193,880 shares of our Class B common stock.Common Stock. Shares of our Class B common stockCommon Stock may be converted into Class A common stockCommon Stock at any time on a one for one basis. Under the terms of a registration rights agreement with respect to outstanding shares of our Class B common stock,Common Stock, the holders of our Class B common stockCommon Stock have rights with respect to the registration of the underlying Class A common stock.Common Stock. Under these registration rights, the holders of Class B common stockCommon Stock may require, on up to two occasions, that we register their shares for public resale. If we are eligible to use Form S-3 or a similar short-form registration statement, the holders of Class B common stockCommon Stock may require that we register their shares for public resale up to two times per year. If we elect to register any shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock for any public offering, the holders of Class B common stockCommon Stock are entitled to include shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock into which such shares of Class B common stockCommon Stock may be converted in such registration. However, we may reduce the number of shares proposed to be registered in view of market conditions. We will pay all expenses in connection with any registration, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. If all of the available registered shares are sold into the public market the trading price of our Class A common stockCommon Stock could decline.

Our Class A common stock has insignificant voting power.

Our Class B common stock entitles its holders to ten votes for each share and our Class A common stock entitles its holders to one vote per share. As of February 1, 2007, our Class B common stock constituted 18.9% of our total outstanding common stock and 70.0% of the total outstanding voting power and thus is able to exercise a controlling influence over our business.

Item 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSCOMMENTS.

        None.


Item 2.    .PROPERTIES.

None.

23




Item 2.    PROPERTIES.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, we maintained approximately 8470 facilities worldwide, including our corporate headquarters located in North Andover, Massachusetts. The remaining facilities consist of foundries, manufacturing facilities, warehouses, sales offices and distribution centers. The principal properties in each of our three geographic segments and their location, principal use and ownership status are set forth below:

North America:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

North Andover, MA

Corporate Headquarters

Owned

Export, PA

Manufacturing

Owned

Franklin, NH

Manufacturing/
Distribution

Owned

Burlington, ON, Canada

Manufacturing

Manufacturing/Distribution

Owned

Kansas City, KS

Manufacturing

Owned

Fort Myers, FL

Manufacturing

Owned

St. Pauls, NC

Manufacturing

Owned

Spindale, NC

Manufacturing/
Distribution

Owned

Chesnee, SC

Manufacturing

Owned

Palmdale, CA

Dunnellon, FL

Manufacturing

Warehouse

Owned

Dunnellon, FL

Warehouse

Owned

San Antonio, TX

Warehouse

Owned

Springfield, MO

Manufacturing/
Distribution

Leased

Langley, BC, Canada

Peoria, AZ

Manufacturing

Manufacturing/Distribution

Leased

Santa Ana, CA

Kansas City, MO

Manufacturing

Manufacturing/Distribution

Leased

Woodland, CA

Reno, NV

Manufacturing

Distribution Center

Leased

Houston, TX

Manufacturing

Leased

Wilmington, NC

Manufacturing

Leased

Phoenix, AZ

Warehouse

Leased

Chicago, IL

Distribution Center

Leased

Reno, NV

Distribution Center

Leased

Vernon, CA

Distribution Center

Leased

Calgary, AB, Canada

Distribution Center

Leased

Europe:


Europe:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

Eerbeek, NetherlandsEuropean Headquarters/ManufacturingOwned

Eerbeek, Netherlands

Biassono, Italy

European Headquarters/
Manufacturing

Owned

Biassono,Brescia, Italy

Manufacturing

Owned

Brescia, Italy

Landau, Germany

Manufacturing

Owned

Landau, Germany

Fresseneville, France

Manufacturing

Owned

Fresseneville,Hautvillers, France

Manufacturing

Owned

Hautvillers, France

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Manufacturing

Owned

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Vildjberg, Denmark

Manufacturing

Owned

Ammanford, United Kingdom

Rosières, France

Manufacturing

Owned

Leased

Rosières, France

Monastir, Tunisia

Manufacturing

Leased

Monastir, Tunisia

Gardolo, Italy

Manufacturing

Leased

Gardolo, Italy

Sorgues, France

Manufacturing

Leased

Sorgues,Grenoble, France

Manufacturing

Leased

Grenoble, France

Vojens, Denmark

Manufacturing

Warehouse

Leased

China:

Location

Principal Use

Owned/Leased

Shanghai, ChinaAsian HeadquartersLeased

Tianjin Tanggu District, THMT, China

Manufacturing

Owned

Taizhou, Yuhuan, China

Manufacturing

Owned

Hunan, Changsha, China

Manufacturing

Owned

Ningbo, Beilun, China

Manufacturing

Owned

Tianjin Tanggu District, China

Manufacturing

Leased

Ningbo, Beilun Port, China

Distribution Center

Leased


        

Certain of our facilities are subject to mortgages and collateral assignments under loan agreements with long-term lenders. In general, we believe that our properties, including machinery, tools and equipment, are in good condition, well maintained and adequate and suitable for their intended uses. We believe thatMany of our manufacturing facilitiesplants are currently operating at a levellevels that our management considers below normal capacity exceptdue to the current worldwide recession. As part of our continuous manufacturing footprint review, management plans to further consolidate its operations. See Recent Developments in Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," for our plants in St. Pauls, North Carolina, Langley, BC, Canada and Gardolo, Italy which are under-utilized. Management believes capacity utilization will continue to increase in 2007 at these plants, subject to unexpected changes in our sales volume.more details.

Item 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are from time to time involved in various legal and administrative procedures. See Part I, Item 1, “Business—1. "Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters," which is incorporated herein by referencereference.


Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no matters submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report to a vote of security holders through solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

25




PART II

Item 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’SREGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of our Class A common stockCommon Stock on the New York Stock Exchange during 20062009 and 20052008 and cash dividends paid per share.

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

 

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

 

First Quarter

 

$

37.00

 

$

29.55

 

 

$

.09

 

 

$

34.87

 

$

29.00

 

 

$

0.08

 

 

Second Quarter

 

40.03

 

29.00

 

 

.09

 

 

36.22

 

29.70

 

 

0.08

 

 

Third Quarter

 

36.24

 

28.08

 

 

.09

 

 

37.55

 

27.46

 

 

0.08

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

45.43

 

30.71

 

 

.09

 

 

31.72

 

25.80

 

 

0.08

 

 

 
 2009 2008 
 
 High Low Dividend High Low Dividend 

First Quarter

 $25.90 $15.76 $0.11 $30.75 $24.02 $0.11 

Second Quarter

  22.49  19.30  0.11  31.00  24.17  0.11 

Third Quarter

  32.36  19.67  0.11  33.00  21.89  0.11 

Fourth Quarter

  32.38  28.15  0.11  29.90  16.67  0.11 

        

There is no established public trading market for our Class B common stock,Common Stock, which is held exclusively by members of the Horne family. The principal holders of such stock are subject to restrictions on transfer with respect to their shares. Each share of our Class B common stockCommon Stock (10 votes per share) is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock (1 vote per share).

        On February 9, 2010, we declared a quarterly dividend of eleven cents ($0.11) per share on each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.

Aggregate common stock dividend payments in both 2009 and 2008 were $16.2 million, which consisted of $13.0 million and $3.2 million for 2006Class A shares and 2005 were $12,445,000 and $10,480,000,Class B shares, respectively. While we presently intend to continue to pay cash dividends, the payment of future cash dividends depends upon the Board of Directors’Directors' assessment of our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors.

The number of record holders of our Class A common stockCommon Stock as of February 23, 200719, 2010 was 166.156. The number of record holders of our Class B common stockCommon Stock as of February 19, 2010 was 7.

        We satisfy the minimum withholding tax obligation due upon the vesting of shares of restricted stock and the conversion of restricted stock units into shares of Class A Common Stock by automatically withholding from the shares being issued a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value on the date of such vesting or conversion that would satisfy the withholding amount due.

        We did not withhold any Class A Common Stock for withholding tax obligations during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

        The following table includes information with respect to repurchases we made of our Class A Common Stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2009.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
(a) Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (or Unit)
(c) Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs(1)
(d) Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares (or
Units) that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs(1)

September 28, 2009 - October 25, 2009

553,615

October 26, 2009 - November 22, 2009

553,615

November 23, 2009 - December 31, 2009

553,615

Total

553,615

(1)
On November 9, 2007, was 8.

we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. Under the program, we may repurchase up to an aggregate of 3.0 million shares of our Class A Common Stock in open market purchases or in privately negotiated transactions. On October 28, 2008, we announced that we had temporarily suspended our stock repurchase program. No shares were repurchased during the quarter ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, we had repurchased 2.45 million shares of stock for a total cost of $68.1 million. We did not repurchase any shares of stock in 2009.

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on our classClass A common stockCommon Stock for the last five years with the cumulative return of companies on the Standard & Poor’sPoor's 500 Stock Index and the Russell 2000 Index. We chose the Russell 2000 Index because it represents companies with a market capitalization similar to that of Watts. We have ceased using a peer group because we believe that there are few public companies engaged in lines of business directly comparable to those of Watts. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our classClass A common stockCommon Stock and each index was $100 at December 31, 20012004 and that all dividends were reinvested.

COMPARISON OF FIVE5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Watts Water Technologies, Inc.,
the The S&P 500 Index
and theThe Russell 2000 Index


*                    $100
$100 invested on December 31, 20012004 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

Cumulative Total Return

 

 

12/31/01

 

12/31/02

 

12/31/03

 

12/31/04

 

12/31/05

 

12/31/06

 

 

Watts Water Technologies, Inc.

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

106.43

 

 

 

152.25

 

 

 

223.53

 

 

 

212.17

 

 

 

290.85

 

 

S & P 500

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

77.90

 

 

 

100.24

 

 

 

111.15

 

 

 

116.61

 

 

 

135.03

 

 

Russell 2000

 

 

100.00

 

 

 

79.52

 

 

 

117.09

 

 

 

138.55

 

 

 

144.86

 

 

 

171.47

 

 

 
 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 

Watts Water Technologies, Inc

  100.00  94.92  130.11  95.43  81.41  102.68 

S & P 500

  100.00  104.91  121.48  128.16  80.74  102.11 

Russell 2000

  100.00  104.55  123.76  121.82  80.66  102.58 

        

The foregoingabove Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material”"soliciting material" or to be “filed”"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that the Companywe specifically incorporatesincorporate it by reference into such filing.


27




Item 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related Notes thereto and “Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations" included herein.

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except per share and cash dividend information)

 

 

Year Ended
12/31/06(1)(6)

 

Year Ended
12/31/05(2)(3)(6)

 

Year Ended
12/31/04(4)(5)(6)

 

Year Ended
12/31/03(6)(7)

 

Year Ended
12/31/02(8)

 

Statement of operations data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

$

1,230,777

 

 

 

$

924,346

 

 

 

$

824,558

 

 

 

$

701,859

 

 

 

$

615,526

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

77,093

 

 

 

55,020

 

 

 

48,738

 

 

 

36,419

 

 

 

32,622

 

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

(3,357

)

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(1,918

)

 

 

(3,057

)

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

73,736

 

 

 

54,599

 

 

 

46,820

 

 

 

33,362

 

 

 

32,622

 

 

Income per share from continuing operations—diluted

 

 

2.29

 

 

 

1.67

 

 

 

1.49

 

 

 

1.32

 

 

 

1.21

 

 

Loss per share from discontinued operations—diluted

 

 

(0.10

)

 

 

(0.01

)

 

 

(0.06

)

 

 

(0.11

)

 

 

 

 

Net income per share—diluted

 

 

2.19

 

 

 

1.66

 

 

 

1.43

 

 

 

1.21

 

 

 

1.21

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

 

$

0.36

 

 

 

$

0.32

 

 

 

$

0.28

 

 

 

$

0.25

 

 

 

$

0.24

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (at year end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

 

$

1,660,850

 

 

 

$

1,100,970

 

 

 

$

922,680

 

 

 

$

840,918

 

 

 

$

635,472

 

 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 

 

$

441,697

 

 

 

$

293,350

 

 

 

$

180,562

 

 

 

$

179,061

 

 

 

$

56,276

 

 

 
 Year Ended
12/31/09(1)(7)
 Year Ended
12/31/08(2)(7)
 Year Ended
12/31/07(3)(7)
 Year Ended
12/31/06(4)(7)
 Year Ended
12/31/05(5)(6)(7)
 

Statement of operations data:

                

Net sales

 $1,225.9 $1,431.4 $1,356.3 $1,211.3 $914.3 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 

  41.0  45.2  75.7  74.6  53.5 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (23.6) 1.4  1.7  (0.9) 1.1 

Net income attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 

  17.4  46.6  77.4  73.7  54.6 

DILUTED EPS

                

Income (loss) per share attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

                
 

Continuing operations

  1.10  1.23  1.94  2.22  1.62 
 

Discontinued operations

  (0.63) 0.04  0.04  (0.03) 0.04 
 

NET INCOME

  0.47  1.26  1.99  2.19  1.66 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 $0.44 $0.44 $0.40 $0.36 $0.32 

Balance sheet data (at year end):

                

Total assets

 $$1,591.4 $1,660.1 $1,729.3 $1,660.9 $1,101.0 

Long-term debt, net of current portion

 $304.0 $409.8 $432.2 $441.7 $293.4 

(1)
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net income includes the following net pre-tax costs: intangible impairments, severance costs, asset write-downs and other costs in North America of $2.6 million, $1.4 million, $2.4 million and $0.4 million respectively; intangible impairments, severance costs, asset write-downs and other costs in Europe of $0.7 million, $5.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million respectively; severance costs, asset write-downs and income from the gain on the sale of TWT in China of $1.3 million, $7.4 million, and $1.1 million respectively. Additionally, net income includes a tax charge of $3.9 million, or $0.11 per share, relating to previously realized tax benefits, which are expected to be recaptured as a result of our decision to restructure our operations in China. The after-tax cost of these items was $20.7 million.

(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2008, net income includes the following net pre-tax costs: goodwill impairment, severance costs, asset write-downs and other costs in North America of $22.0 million, $2.6 million, $0.4 million and $1.5 million respectively; accelerated depreciation and other costs in China of $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively and minority interest income of $0.2 million; severance costs in Europe of $0.2 million. The after-tax cost of these items was $21.2 million.

(3)
For the year ended December 31, 2007, net income includes the following net pre-tax costs: change in estimate of workers' compensation costs of $2.9 million, severance and product line discontinuance costs in North America of $0.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively; accelerated depreciation and asset write-downs, product line discontinuance costs and severance costs in China

(1)

    of $2.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and minority interest income of $0.9 million. The after-tax cost of these items was $6.9 million.

(4)
For the year ended December 31, 2006, net income includes the following net pre-tax gain: gain on sales of buildings of $8,188,000,$8.2 million, restructuring costs consisting primarily of European severance of $2,150,000$2.2 million and amortization of $390,000,$0.4 million, other costs consisting of accelerated depreciation and severance in our Chinese joint venture of $4,667,000$4.7 million and minority interest income of $1,530,000.$1.5 million. The after-tax gain of these items was $1,465,000.

(2)$1.5 million.

(5)
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net income includes the following pre-tax costs: restructuring of $729,000$0.7 million and other costs consisting of accelerated depreciation and asset write downswrite-downs of $1,816,000.$1.8 million. The after-tax cost of these items was $1,633,000.

(3)$1.6 million.

(6)
For the year ended December 31, 2005, net income includes a net after-tax charge of $933,000$0.9 million for a selling, general and administrative expense charge of $1,505,000$1.5 million related to a contingent earn-out agreement.

(4)          For

(7)
In September 2009, the year ended December 31, 2004, net income includes a net after-tax chargeCompany's Board of $2,289,000 for certain accrued expense adjustments, whichDirectors approved the sale of its investment in Watts Valve (Changsha) Co., Ltd. (CWV) and subsequently sold CWV in January 2010. Results from operation and estimated loss on disposal are included in selling, general and administrative expense after-tax charges of $3,475,000 related to a contingent earn-out agreement and $724,000 for various accrual adjustments and $462,000 recorded as an income tax benefit.

(5)          For the year ended December 31, 2004, net income includes the following pre-tax costs: restructuring of $95,000 and other costs consisting of accelerated depreciation of $2,873,000. The after-tax cost of these items was $1,825,000.


(6)          In December 2004, we decided to divest our interest in our minority-owned subsidiary, Jameco International, LLC (Jameco LLC). We recorded in discontinued operation a net of tax impairment charge of $739,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. Also includedCWV in discontinued operations isfor 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006. In May 2009, the Company liquidated its TEAM Precision Pipework, Ltd. (TEAM) business. Results from operation and loss on disposal are included net of tax operating resultsfrom the deconsolidation of Jameco LLC of $54,000 of lossTEAM in discontinued operations for 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and $54,000 of income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.2005. In September 1996, we divested our Municipal Water Group of businesses, which included Henry Pratt, James Jones Company and Edward Barber and Company Ltd. Costs and expenses related to the Municipal Water Group, for 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 2005, 2004 and 20032005 relate to legal and settlement costs associated with the James Jones Litigation. The loss,Income (loss) for total discontinued operations, net of taxes, consists of $3,401,000, $421,000, $1,125,000($23.6) million, $1.4 million, $1.7 million, ($0.9) million and $3,111,000$1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.


(7)
          For the year ended December 31, 2003, net income includes the following pre-tax costs: restructuring of $426,000; other costs consist of inventory and other asset write-downs and accelerated depreciation of $479,000; and $750,000 of other related charges. The after-tax cost of these items was $1,084,000.

(8)          For the year ended December 31, 2002, net income includes the following pre-tax costs: restructuring of $638,000; other costs consist of: inventory and other asset write-downs and accelerated depreciation of $2,491,000; and $960,000 of other related charges. The after-tax cost of these items was $2,552,000.

29




Item 7.MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Overview

We are a leading supplier of products for use in the water quality, water safety, water flow control and water conservation markets in both North America and Europe with an emerginga presence in China.Asia. For over 130135 years, we have designed and manufactured products that promote the comfort and safety of people and the quality and conservation of water used in commercial and residential applications. We earn revenue and income almost exclusively from the sale of our products. Our principal product lines include:include:

·       large diameter butterfly valves for use in China’s water infrastructure.

Our business is reported in three geographic segments,segments: North America, Europe and China. We distribute our products through three primary distribution channels,channels: wholesale, do-it-yourself (DIY) and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Interest rates have an indirect effect on the demand for our products due to the effect such rates have on the number of new residential and commercial construction starts and remodeling projects. All three of these activities have an impact on our levels of sales and earnings. An additional factor that has had an effect on our sales is fluctuation in foreign currencies, as a portion of our sales and certain portions of our costs, assets and liabilities are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

We believe that the factors relating to our future growth include our ability to continue to make selective acquisitions, both in our core markets as well as in new complementary markets, regulatory requirements relating to the quality and conservation of water, increased demand for clean water, with continued enforcement of plumbing and building codes and a healthy economic environment. We have completed 3032 acquisitions since divesting our industrial and oil and gas business in 1999. Our acquisition strategy focuses on businesses that manufacture preferred brand name products that address our themes of water quality, water conservation, water safety and water flow control and related complementary markets. We target businesses that will provide us with one or more of the following: an entry into new markets, an increase in shelf space with existing customers, a new or improved technology or an expansion of the breadth of our water quality, water conservation, water safety and water flow control products for the residential and commercial markets. In 2006, sales from acquisitions contributed approximately 20.9% to our total sales growth over the prior year.

Products representing a majority of our sales are subject to regulatory standards and code enforcement, which typically require that these products meet stringent performance criteria. Together


with our commissioned manufacturers’manufacturers' representatives, we have consistently advocated for the development and enforcement of such plumbing codes. We are focused on maintaining stringent quality control and testing procedures at each of our manufacturing facilities in order to manufacture products



in compliance with code requirements and take advantage of the resulting demand for compliant products. We believe that the product development, product testing capability and investment in plant and equipment needed to manufacture products in compliance with code requirements, represent a barrier to entry for competitors. We believe that, over the long term, there is an increasing demand among consumers for products to ensure water quality, which creates growth opportunities for our products.

        Our sales in 2009 were affected by downward pressure from a weak U.S. commercial construction marketplace. In addition, U.S. residential construction activity was at historically low levels. We continued to see marked reductions in European sales as the European economy migrated into a recession. Plant under-absorption and negative foreign currency movements affected operating results in 2009. Foreign currency movements, mainly related to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Canadian dollar, negatively affected 2009 diluted earnings per share by $0.03 compared to 2008. In response to these concerns, we took numerous steps to ensure we remain on a firm fiscal platform. In the latter half of 2008, we announced a reduction of the United States workforce, implemented a ten-month salary freeze in North America and initiated a review of discretionary spending in order to reduce operating expenses. In 2009, we expanded our cost savings programs on a worldwide basis. We initiated salary reductions, worker furloughs and other cost reductions in an effort to leverage our costs against anticipated lower sales volumes. Additionally, in February 2009, we expanded and accelerated our restructuring program to consolidate our manufacturing footprint in North America and China. Savings from this program will be realized in 2010. Lastly, we are continuing our implementation of lean manufacturing and Six Sigma disciplines to partially offset negative pressures on operating income.

We require substantial amounts of raw materials to produce our products, including bronze, brass, cast iron, steel, plastic and plastic,components used in products, and substantially all of the raw materials we require are purchased from outside sources. We have experienced increasesvolatility in the costs of certain raw materials, particularly copper. Bronze and brass are copper-based alloys. During 2006, theThe spot price of copper during 2009 increased approximately 33%.153.1% from December 31, 2008. We typically carry several months of inventory on-hand primarily due to the significant extent of our international sourcing.

A risk we face is our ability to deal effectively with increaseschanges in raw material costs. We manage this risk by monitoring related market prices, working with our suppliers to achieve the maximum level of stability in their costs and related pricing, seeking alternative supply sources when necessary, implementing cost reduction programs and passing increases in costs to our customers, to the maximum extent possible, when they occur.customers. Additionally from time to time we may use commodity futures contracts on a limited basis to manage this risk. We are not able to predict whether or for how long these cost increasesthis volatility will continue. If these cost increases continue and we are not able to reduce or eliminate the effect of the cost increases by reducing production costs or implementing price increases, our profit margins could decrease.

Another risk we face in all areas of our business is competition. We consider brand preference, engineering specifications, code requirements, price, technological expertise, delivery times and breadth of product offerings to be the primary competitive factors. As mentioned previously, we believe that the product development, product testing capability and investment in plant and equipment needed to manufacture products in compliance with code requirements, represent a barrier to entry for competitors. We are committed to maintaining our capital equipment at a level consistent with current technologies, and thus we spent approximately $44,648,000$24.2 million in 2006 (including approximately $18,000,000 related to the purchase2009 and subsequent sale-leaseback of a building$26.2 million in Italy) and $18,590,000 in 2005. We are committed to expanding our manufacturing capacity in lower cost countries such as China, Tunisia and Bulgaria.2008.

Recent Developments

In February 2007,September 2009, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of sharessale of our Class A common stock authorizedinvestment in Watts Valve (Changsha) Co., Ltd. (CWV). We completed the sale of CWV in January 2010. Additionally, in May 2009, we liquidated our TEAM Precision Pipework, Ltd. (TEAM) subsidiary through an administration process under the United Kingdom law, as more fully described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We classified CWV and TEAM's results of operations and any related losses as discontinued operations for issuance from 80,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. This amendment remains subject to approval of our stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for May 2, 2007.all periods presented.


Recent Developments

In        On February 2007,9, 2010, we declared a quarterly dividend of teneleven cents ($0.10)0.11) per share on each outstanding share of Class A common stockCommon Stock and Class B common stock. ThisCommon Stock.

        On February 8, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring program with respect to our operating facilities in France. The restructuring program is an increaseexpected to include the shutdown of $0.01 per share comparedthree facilities, including two manufacturing sites and one distribution center. The program is expected to the dividend paidinclude pre-tax charges totaling approximately $12.5 million, including costs for the comparable period last year.

In November 2006, we issuedseverance, relocation, clean-up and sold 5,750,000 shares of Class A common stock in an underwritten public offering. The price to the public of the shares soldcertain asset write-downs, and result in the offering was $40.00 per share. The proceedselimination of approximately 95 positions. Total net after-tax charges for this restructuring program are expected to the Company, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, wasbe approximately $218,611,000.$8.3 million ($1.1 million in non-cash charges), with costs being incurred through 2011. We expect to usespend approximately $6.6 million in capital expenditures to consolidate operations. Annual cash savings, net of tax, are estimated to be $3.9 million, which we expect to fully realize by 2012. We recorded after-tax charges of approximately $3.0 million, or ($0.08) per share, in the net proceeds fromfourth quarter of 2009 for severance and other costs related to this program.

        On February 8, 2010, Daniel J. Murphy, III, one of our directors, informed the offeringBoard of his decision not to stand for general corporate purposes, includingre-election at our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, which will be held on May 12, 2010. Mr. Murphy advised the fundingBoard that his decision was made for personal reasons and was not the result of future acquisitions.any dispute or disagreement with us on any matter relating to our operations, policies or practices. Mr. Murphy currently serves as a member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.


        Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no member of the Board shall be nominated by the Board to serve as a director after he has passed his 72nd birthday, unless the Board has voted to waive the mandatory retirement age of such person as a director. Timothy P. Horne, a member of our Board, will pass his 72nd birthday in April 2010, prior to our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders. On February 8, 2010, Mr. Horne advised the Board that he does not wish to have the Board waive the mandatory retirement age for him under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and therefore Mr. Horne will also not stand for re-election at our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.

        On January 18, 2010, David J. Coghlan was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. In his new role, Mr. Coghlan will assume responsibility for our European operations in addition to his continuing responsibilities for our operations in North America and Asia. Mr. Coghlan has served as our President of North America and Asia since June 2008.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 20062009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20052008

Net Sales.Our business is reported in three geographic segments: North America, Europe and China. Our net sales in each of these segments for the years ended December 31, 20062009 and 20052008 were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended
 December 31, 2006

 

Year Ended
 December 31, 2005

 

 

 

Change to
 Consolidated

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

% Sales

 

Net Sales

 

% Sales

 

Change

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

North America

 

$

821,276

 

 

66.7

%

 

$

629,937

 

 

68.2

%

 

$

191,339

 

 

20.7

%

 

Europe

 

367,522

 

 

29.9

 

 

266,346

 

 

28.8

 

 

101,176

 

 

11.0

 

 

China

 

41,979

 

 

3.4

 

 

28,063

 

 

3.0

 

 

13,916

 

 

1.5

 

 

Total

 

$

1,230,777

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

924,346

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

306,431

 

 

33.2

%

 

 
 Year Ended December 31, 2009 Year Ended December 31, 2008  
  
 
 
  
 Change to
Consolidated
Net Sales
 
 
 Net Sales % Sales Net Sales % Sales Change 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

North America

 $738.5  60.2%$866.2  60.5%$(127.7) (8.9)%

Europe

  466.5  38.1  532.0  37.2  (65.5) (4.6)

China

  20.9  1.7  33.2  2.3  (12.3) (0.9)
              

Total

 $1,225.9  100.0%$1,431.4  100.0%$(205.5) (14.4)%
              

        

The increasechange in net sales is attributable to the following:

Change
As a % of Consolidated
Net Sales

Change
As a % of Segment
Net Sales

North
 America

Europe

China

Total

North
 America

Europe

China

Total

North
 America

Europe

China

(Dollars in thousands)

Internal growth

 

 

$

53,962

 

 

$

45,207

 

$

2,981

 

$

102,150

 

 

5.9

%

 

 

4.9

%

 

 

.3

%

 

 

11.1

%

 

 

8.6

%

 

 

17.0

%

 

 

10.6

%

 

Foreign exchange

 

 

3,518

 

 

7,107

 

851

 

11,476

 

 

.3

 

 

 

.8

 

 

 

.1

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

.6

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

133,859

 

 

48,862

 

10,084

 

192,805

 

 

14.5

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

20.9

 

 

 

21.2

 

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

35.9

 

 

Total

 

 

$

191,339

 

 

$

101,176

 

$

13,916

 

$

306,431

 

 

20.7

%

 

 

11.0

%

 

 

1.5

%

 

 

33.2

%

 

 

30.4

%

 

 

38.0

%

 

 

49.5

%

 

 
  
  
  
  
 Change As a %
of Consolidated Net Sales
 Change As a %
of Segment Net Sales
 
 
 North
America
 Europe China Total North
America
 Europe China Total North
America
 Europe China 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Organic

 $(123.1)$(75.3)$(5.7)$(204.1) (8.6)% (5.3)% (0.4)% (14.3)% (14.2)% (14.2)% (17.2)%

Foreign exchange

  (4.6) (17.7) 0.3  (22.0) (0.3) (1.2)   (1.5) (0.5) (3.3) 0.9 

Acquisitions

    27.5    27.5    1.9    1.9    5.2   

Disposal

      (6.9) (6.9)     (0.5) (0.5)     (20.7)
                        

Total

 $(127.7)$(65.5)$(12.3)$(205.5) (8.9)% (4.6)% (0.9)% (14.4)% (14.7)% (12.3)% (37.0)%
                        

        

The internal growthorganic decline in net sales in North America was primarily due to increased price anddecreased unit sales in certainof our plumbing and heating, backflow and gas connector product lineslines. Organic sales into both the wholesale and DIY markets. OurNorth American wholesale market in 2006, excluding the sales from the acquisitions of Alamo, Savard, Calflex, Flexflow, Core and Dormont, grew2009 declined by 9.7%17.9% compared to 2005,2008. This was primarily due to increaseddecreased unit sales across most of water pressure regulators, relief valves and backflow preventer units, as well as in our plumbing and under-floor radiant heating product lines. OurOrganic sales into the North American DIY market in 20062009 increased by 5.4%0.6% compared to 2005,2008 primarily due to increased sales of fittingsincremental product line penetration at certain retail customers and supply lines and plumbing and under-floor radiant heating product lines partiallyselected market share gains being offset by fewer new retail product introductionslower sales to certain customers.

        Organic net sales declined in 2006 thanEurope primarily due to decreased sales in the European wholesale and OEM markets. Our sales into the European wholesale market in 2009 decreased by 13.5% and our sales into the European OEM market decreased by 15.7% compared to 2008 primarily due to the markets in Italy and Germany being soft. Acquired sales growth in Europe was due to the inclusion of Blücher Metal A/S (Blücher), which was acquired on May 30, 2008.

        Organic net sales declined in China primarily due to decreased sales in the Chinese export markets. China sales were also negatively affected as compared to 2008 from the disposal of TWT during 2005.the fourth quarter of 2008.

The increasedecreases in net sales due to foreign exchange in North America was due to the Canadian dollar appreciating against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the Canadian dollar will continue to appreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net sales.

The acquired growth in net sales in North America was due to the inclusion of net sales of Alamo, acquired on June 20, 2005, Savard, acquired on July 8, 2005, Flexflow, acquired on November 4, 2005, Core, acquired on December 2, 2005, Dormont, acquired on December 28, 2005, and Calflex acquired on June 2, 2006.

The internal sales growth in Europe was broad-based with most markets and channels exhibiting improvement. Our sales into the wholesale and OEM markets in 2006, excluding the sales from the acquisitions of Electro Controls, Microflex, ATS, Kimsafe and Teknigas, grew by 18.5% and 16.4% respectively, compared to 2005.

The increase in net sales due to foreign exchange in Europe waswere primarily due to the appreciationdepreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the euro will appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net sales.


The acquired growth in net sales in Europe was due to the inclusion of the net sales of Electro Controls, acquired on May 11, 2005, Microflex, acquired on July 5, 2005, ATS, acquired on May 19, 2006, Kimsafe, acquired on June 7, 2006, and Teknigas, acquired on August 14, 2006.

The internal sales growth in China was due to increased sales into the domestic and export markets, partially offset by lost sales due to an approximately four- week work stoppage at our joint-venture facility in Tianjin. Additionally, the yuan strengthened against the U.S. dollar.

The acquired growth in net sales in China was due to the inclusion of the net sales of Changsha, acquired on April 26, 2006, and Ningbo, acquired on June 2, 2006.

Gross Profit.   Gross profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales (gross margin) for 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

Point

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

$

425,018

 

$

324,702

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin

 

34.5

%

35.1

%

 

(.6%

)

 

Gross margin as a percent of sales for 2006 decreased slightly from 2005. Raw materials cost increases have been predominantly offset by increased sales prices with the exception of the North American retail market and certain markets in Europe. In particular, price increases have been difficult to pass along to customers in Germany.  Margins have also been negatively affected by sales of lower margin products sold by Core and by European acquisition costs. North American gross margin percentage decreases were partially offset by a favorable sales mix toward higher margin wholesale sales.

Margins were also negatively affected in 2006 by increased charges related to our manufacturing restructuring efforts. We recorded $4,667,000 to cost of sales for primarily severance costs in 2006 as compared to $1,816,000 in 2005 for accelerated depreciation and other costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A expenses, for 2006 increased $70,761,000, or 30.8%, compared to 2005. The increase in SG&A expenses is attributable to the following:

 

 

(in thousands)

 

% Change

 

Internal growth

 

 

$

24,575

 

 

 

10.7

%

 

Foreign exchange

 

 

2,106

 

 

 

.9

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

44,080

 

 

 

19.2

 

 

Total

 

 

$

70,761

 

 

 

30.8

%

 

The internal increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to increased variable selling expenses due to increased sales volumes, increased insurance costs, increased compensation costs and corporate administration costs including costs incurred for compliance with FAS 123R, partially offset by lower costs for complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) and lower earn-out costs related to a prior acquisition. The increase in SG&A expenses from foreign exchange was primarily due to the appreciation of the euro, Canadian dollar and yuan against the U.S. dollar. The increase in SG&A expenses from acquisitions was due to the inclusion of Electro Controls, Alamo, Microflex, Savard, Flexflow, Core, Dormont, Changsha, ATS, Calflex, Ningbo, Kimsafe and Teknigas.

Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges.Restructuring and other (income) charges for 2006 decreased $6,377,000 primarily due to a gain of approximately $8,188,000 related to the sale of two buildings in Italy partially offset by a charge of $2,540,000 primarily for severance costs related to our European


restructuring plans. During 2005, we recorded $729,000 primarily for severance costs related to our European restructuring plans.

Operating Income.Operating income by geographic segment for 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change to

 

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

Income

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

North America

 

 

$

98,507

 

 

 

$

79,067

 

 

$

19,440

 

 

20.6

%

 

Europe

 

 

49,976

 

 

 

31,528

 

 

18,448

 

 

19.5

 

 

China

 

 

7,155

 

 

 

3,533

 

 

3,622

 

 

3.8

 

 

Corporate

 

 

(25,151

)

 

 

(19,573

)

 

(5,578

)

 

(5.9

)

 

Total

 

 

$

130,487

 

 

 

$

94,555

 

 

$

35,932

 

 

38.0

%

 

The increase in operating income is attributable to the following:

Change
As a % of Consolidated
Operating Income

Change
As a % of Segment
Operating Income

North
America

Europe

China

Corp.

Total

North
America

Europe

China

Corp.

Total

North
America

Europe

China

Corp.

(Dollars in thousands)

Internal growth

 

$

6,469

 

$

7,380

 

$

6,690

 

$

(5,578

)

$

14,961

 

 

6.9

%

 

7.8

%

 

7.1

%

 

(5.9

)%

 

15.9

%

 

8.2

%

 

23.4

%

189.4

%

(28.5

)%

Foreign exchange

 

787

 

949

 

295

 

 

2,031

 

 

.8

 

 

1.0

 

 

.3

 

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

1.0

 

 

3.0

 

8.3

 

 

Acquisitions

 

11,179

 

2,541

 

1,694

 

 

15,414

 

 

11.8

 

 

2.7

 

 

1.8

 

 

 

 

16.3

 

 

14.1

 

 

8.1

 

47.9

 

 

Other— Restructuring

 

1,005

 

7,578

 

(5,057

)

 

3,526

 

 

1.1

 

 

8.0

 

 

(5.4

)

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

1.3

 

 

24.0

 

(143.1

)

 

Total

 

$

19,440

 

$

18,448

 

$

3,622

 

$

(5,578

)

$

35,932

 

 

20.6

%

 

19.5

%

 

3.8

%

 

(5.9

)%

 

38.0

%

 

24.6

%

 

58.5

%

102.5

%

(28.5

)%

The internal growth in North America was primarily due to our increased gross profit from price increases and a favorable sales mix towards the wholesale market, benefits resulting from our completed manufacturing restructuring projects and product outsourcing, partially offset by increased net SG&A expense and inventory write-downs. In 2006, we did not record any costs associated with our manufacturing restructuring plan compared to costs of $1,005,000 for 2005. The acquired growth was due to the inclusion of operating income from Alamo, Savard, Flexflow, Core, Dormont and Calflex.

The internal growth in Europe was primarily due to increased gross profit from price and unit increases in the wholesale and OEM markets and benefits resulting from our completed manufacturing restructuring projects, partially offset by increased net SG&A expense. In 2006, we recorded a net gain of $6,038,000 associated with our manufacturing restructuring plan compared to a charge of $1,540,000 for 2005. We recorded a gain of $8,188,000 for the building sales in Italy partially offset by $2,150,000 primarily for severance costs. The acquired growth in Europe was due to the inclusion of the operating income from Electro Controls, Microflex, ATS, Kimsafe and Teknigas.

The increase in internal growth in China was attributable to sales volume increase, favorable material purchases and improved manufacturing efficiencies associated with our wholly owned manufacturing plants, partially offset by increased net SG&A expense. The acquired growth in China was due to the inclusion of the operating income from Changsha and Ningbo. In 2006, we recorded $5,057,000 of severance and accelerated depreciation costs associated with the planned move of our Chinese joint venture facility. We expect to record approximately $2,000,000 in 2007 for accelerated depreciation, severance and other costs related to this move. We did not record any costs associated with our manufacturing restructuring plan in 2005.

The decrease in internal operating income in Corporate was primarily attributable to incremental administration charges for variable compensation including costs incurred for compliance with FAS 123R, increased audit costs and increased pension costs, partially offset by lower costs incurred for SOX compliance.


The net increase in operating income from foreign exchange was primarily due to the appreciation of the euro, Canadian dollar and yuanrespectively, against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether these currencies will continue to appreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our operating income.

Interest Income.Interest income increased $3,782,000, or 307.0%, for 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to the investment of the residual proceeds from the private placement of $225,000,000 5.85% senior notes in April 2006 and the net proceeds from the public offering of 5,750,000 shares of our class A common stock in November 2006.

Interest Expense.Interest expense increased $11,795,000, or 113.9%, for 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to interest expense associated with our $225,000,000 5.85% senior notes, increased debt levels for acquisitions made in 2005 and 2006, and an increase in the average variable rates charged on the revolving credit facility.

Effective July 1, 2005, we entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of 25,000,000 outstanding on our revolving credit facility. We swapped three month EURIBOR plus 0.6%, for a fixed rate of 3.02%. We recorded a reduction to interest expense of approximately $673,000 to recognize the fair value of the swap for 2006. The swap was terminated on October 3, 2006.

Other (Income) Expense.Other (income) expense increased $201,000, or 27.6%, for 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to the gains on settlements of officers’ life insurance policies.

Minority interest.Minority interest increased $2,178,000, or 622.3%, for 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to the credit recorded for the 40% liability of our joint venture partner’s share in the recording of the $5,057,000 manufacturing restructuring costs.

Income Taxes.Our effective tax rate for continuing operations decreased to 33.6% in 2006 from 35.9% in 2005. The decrease is primarily due to higher earnings in our European and China segments. The shift in the mix of earnings to these segments causes our rate to decrease as these segments have lower effective tax rates than our worldwide average. The effect of the European earnings mix is partially offset by a higher effective tax from the gain on the sales of our Italian facilities. We were able to claim tax credits based on qualified fixed asset purchases in China that helped reduce the worldwide rate.

Income From Continuing Operations.Income from continuing operations for 2006 increased $22,073,000, or 40.1%, to $77,093,000, or $2.29 per common share, from $55,020,000, or $1.67 per common share, for 2005, in each case, on a diluted basis. Income from continuing operations for 2006 and 2005 includes income, net of tax, for our restructuring plan of $1,465,000, or $0.04 per share, and costs of $1,633,000, or ($0.05) per share, respectively. The gains on the sales of our buildings in Italy resulted in an after-tax gain of $5,138,000, or $0.15 per share. The appreciation of the Canadian dollar, euro and Chinese yuan against the U.S. dollar resulted in a positive impact on income from continuing operations of $1,262,000, or $0.04 per share, for 2006 compared to 2005. We cannot predict whether the euro, Canadian dollar or yuan will continue to appreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net income.

Loss From Discontinued Operations   We recorded a charge, net of tax, to discontinued operations for 2006 and 2005 of $3,357,000, or ($0.10) per common share, and $421,000, or ($0.01) per common share, respectively, in each case, on a diluted basis. In the third quarter of 2006, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $5,000,000 due to a recent federal appellate court decision which affirmed that an arbitration panel could decide which deductible agreements between Watts and Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) would control Zurich’s reimbursement claim for defense costs paid in the James Jones case. Other charges were primarily attributable to legal fees associated with the James Jones litigation, as described in Part I, Item 1. “Business-Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters.”


Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004

Net Sales.Our net sales in each of the three segments for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2005

 

Year Ended
December 31, 2004

 

 

 

Change
to
Consolidated

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

% Sales

 

Net Sales

 

% Sales

 

Change

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

North America

 

$

629,937

 

 

68.2

%

 

$

545,139

 

 

66.1

%

 

$

84,798

 

 

10.3

%

 

Europe

 

266,346

 

 

28.8

 

 

253,234

 

 

30.7

 

 

13,112

 

 

1.6

 

 

China

 

28,063

 

 

3.0

 

 

26,185

 

 

3.2

 

 

1,878

 

 

0.2

 

 

Total

 

$

924,346

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

824,558

 

 

100.0

%

 

$

99,788

 

 

12.1

%

 

The increase in net sales is attributable to the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change
As a % of Consolidated
Net Sales

 

Change
As a % of Segment
Net Sales

 

 

 

North
America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Total

 

North
America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Total

 

North
America

 

Europe

 

China

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Internal growth

 

 

$

51,796

 

$

5,533

 

$

1,529

 

$

58,858

 

 

6.3

%

 

0.7

%

 

0.2

%

 

7.1

%

 

9.5

%

 

2.2

%

 

5.9

%

Foreign exchange

 

 

3,112

 

(2,857

)

349

 

604

 

 

0.4

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

0.6

 

 

(1.1

)

 

1.3

 

Acquisitions

 

 

29,890

 

10,436

 

 

40,326

 

 

3.6

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

4.9

 

 

5.5

 

 

4.1

 

 

 

Total

 

 

$

84,798

 

$

13,112

 

$

1,878

 

$

99,788

 

 

10.3

%

 

1.6

%

 

0.2

%

 

12.1

%

 

15.6

%

 

5.2

%

 

7.2

%

The internal growth in net sales in North America was broad-based in both our wholesale and DIY markets. Our wholesale market for 2005, excluding the sales from acquisitions, grew by 8.5% compared to 2004, primarily due to increased sales of backflow preventor units, as well as increased under-floor radiant heating product lines and increased unit selling prices in most of our product lines. Our sales into the North American DIY market for 2005 increased organically by 12.3% compared to 2004 primarily due to increased sales of fittings and supply lines and under-floor radiant heating products.

The increase in net sales due to foreign exchange in North America is due to the Canadian dollar appreciating against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the Canadian dollar will continue to appreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net sales.

Acquired growth in net sales in North America is due to the inclusion of net sales of Dormont, acquired on December 28, 2005, Core, acquired on December 2, 2005, Flexflow, acquired on November 4, 2005, Savard, acquired on July 8, 2005, Alamo, acquired on June 20, 2005, HF, acquired on January 5, 2005, Sea Tech, acquired on January 4, 2005, and Orion, acquired on May 21, 2004.

Internal growth in Europe net sales results from increased sales into the wholesale market as a result of gaining market share, particularly in Germany. Sales into the European OEM market were primarily flat compared to last year.

Net sales were negatively affected by foreign exchange in Europe primarily from the depreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the euro will continue to depreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net sales.

Acquired growth in Europe net sales is due to the inclusion of the net sales of Microflex, which we acquired on July 5, 2005, Electro Controls, which we acquired on May 11, 2005, and TEAM, acquired on April 16, 2004.


The increase in net sales in China is primarily attributable to increased sales in both the Chinese domestic and export markets.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales (gross margin) for 20052009 and 20042008 were as follows:

 

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

Point

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

$

324,702

 

$

290,561

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin

 

35.1

%

35.2

%

 

(.1%

)

 

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Gross profit

 $435.1 $481.8 

Gross margin

  35.5% 33.7%

        

Gross margin as a percent of sales for 2005profit declined due to decreased slightly from 2004. We experienced internal sales volume, growth in all regions. However, commodity costs, especially for copper-based products and oil-based products, and a sales mix shift in North America and Europe, dampened our margin percentage growth. In 2005, we experienced raw material cost increases, which we were not able to fully recover through price increases on some of our products. North America experienced higher growth in lower-margin retail sales partially offset by a reclassification of product liability costs from cost of sales to selling, general and administrative expense. Europe’s OEM business was flat with an increase in lower margin wholesale product sales. Both regions benefited from completed manufacturing restructuring efforts. The China segment increased gross margin. Gross margin increased by 180 basis points in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily due to lower raw material costs and fewer acquisition charges. Our European gross margin increased sales volume in the domestic marketplace.

Margins were positively affected in 2005 by decreased manufacturing restructuring and other costs. We recorded $1,816,000 to cost of sales primarily for accelerated depreciation and other costs in 20052009 compared to $2,873,0002008 primarily due to the inclusion of higher margin Blücher sales and reduced acquisition costs, offset partially by plant under-absorption. Our China segment's gross margin increased as a result of operational improvements at one of our more significant facilities and the divestiture of TWT. Our North American margin also increased for accelerated depreciation2009 when compared to last year due to lower raw material costs and other costs for 2004.cost savings initiatives offset by recessionary unit volume sales declines and plant under absorption.


Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A expenses, for 2005 increased $22,552,000,2009 decreased $32.1 million, or 10.9%9.0%, compared to 2004.2008. The increasedecrease in SG&A expenses is attributable to the following:

 

 

(in thousands)

 

% Change

 

Internal growth

 

 

$

14,151

 

 

 

6.8

%

 

Foreign exchange

 

 

391

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

Acquisitions

 

 

10,464

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

Other

 

 

(2,454

)

 

 

(1.2

)

 

Total

 

 

$

22,552

 

 

 

10.9

%

 

 
 (in millions) % Change 

Organic

 $(31.1) (8.7)%

Foreign exchange

  (4.7) (1.3)

Acquisitions

  9.0  2.5 

Disposal

  (5.3) (1.5)
      

Total

 $(32.1) (9.0)%
      

        

InternalThe organic decrease in SG&A expenses increasedwas primarily from higherdue to decreased variable selling expenses caused by increased sales volumes in North Americadue to lower shipments, various cost savings measures, lower product liability costs and China, from due-diligence related charges, and from increased bad debt reserves. These cost increases werethe net settlement of two lawsuits, partially offset by lower costs for complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). Additionally, we recorded $1,000,000 in reserve reductions in 2004 related to a favorable ruling in aincreased legal matter.and pension expenses. The increasedecrease in SG&A expenses from foreign exchange iswas primarily due to the appreciationdepreciation of the Canadian dollar and the yuaneuro against the U.S. dollar partially offset byand to a lesser extent the depreciation of the euroCanadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. The increase in SG&A expenses from acquisitions iswas due to the inclusion of Dormont, Core, Savard, Microflex, Alamo, Electro Controls, HF, Sea Tech, OrionBlücher. The reduction due to the disposal relates to the sale of TWT. Total SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 26.4% in 2009 compared to 24.8% in 2008.

        Restructuring and TEAM. Other includesCharges.    In 2009, we recorded a net charge of $16.1 million primarily for asset impairments, severance and relocation costs in North America, Europe and China. Included in the 2009 restructuring and other charges is a $1.1 million gain from the 2008 disposition of $2,454,000TWT. The gain was deferred until all legal and regulatory matters relating to the sale of TWT were resolved. In 2008, we recorded $5.6 million for prior period corrections including an earn-out arrangement from a prior period acquisition that was accountedseverance and relocation costs in North America and China. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for as compensation expense. The earn-out arrangement was completed on August 31, 2005.additional information regarding our restructuring plans.

37




        Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment Charges.    We recorded $3.3 million in 2009 for intangible impairment charges related to certain trademarks and technology. The goodwill impairment charge in 2008 of approximately $22.0 million related to our water quality business unit in North America. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information regarding these impairments.

Operating Income.Operating income by geographic segment for 20052009 and 2004 were2008 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Change to

 

 

 

Years Ended

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Change

 

Income

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

North America

 

 

$

76,757

 

 

 

$

68,558

 

 

$

8,199

 

 

9.8

%

 

Europe

 

 

31,528

 

 

 

31,597

 

 

(69

)

 

(0.1

)

 

China

 

 

3,533

 

 

 

1,857

 

 

1,676

 

 

2.0

 

 

Corporate

 

 

(17,263

)

 

 

(18,412

)

 

1,149

 

 

1.4

 

 

Total

 

 

$

94,555

 

 

 

$

83,600

 

 

$

10,955

 

 

13.1

%

 

 
 Years Ended  
  
 
 
  
 % Change to
Consolidated
Operating
Income
 
 
 December 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 Change 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

North America

 $78.6 $67.8 $10.8  11.0%

Europe

  51.0  65.7  (14.7) (14.9)

China

  (6.6) (7.7) 1.1  1.1 

Corporate

  (30.8) (27.2) (3.6) (3.7)
          

Total

 $92.2 $98.6 $(6.4) (6.5)%
          

        

The increasechange in operating income is attributable to the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As a % of Consolidated Operating Income

 

As a % of Segment Operating Income

 

 

 

North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Corp.

 

Total

 

America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Corp.

 

Total

 

America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Corp.

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Internal growth

 

$(467

)

$(1,100

)

$1,622

 

$1,873

 

$1,928

 

(0.6

)%

(1.3

)%

1.9

%

2.3

%

2.3

%

(0.7

)%

(3.5

)%

87.4

%

(10.2

)%

Foreign exchange

 

658

 

(404

)

54

 

 

308

 

0.8

 

(0.5

)

0.1

 

 

.4

 

1.0

 

(1.3

)

2.9

 

 

Acquisitions

 

2,867

 

2,975

 

 

 

5,842

 

3.4

 

3.6

 

 

 

7.0

 

4.2

 

9.4

 

 

 

Other

 

3,178

 

 

 

(724

)

2,454

 

3.8

 

 

 

(0.9

)

2.9

 

4.6

 

 

 

4.0

 

Other—Restructuring

 

1,963

 

(1,540

)

 

 

423

 

2.4

 

(1.9

)

 

 

.5

 

2.9

 

(4.9

)

 

 

Total

 

$8,199

 

$(69

)

$1,676

 

$1,149

 

$10,955

 

9.8

%

(0.1

)%

2.0

%

1.4

%

13.1

%

12.0

%

(0.3

)%

90.3

%

(6.2

)%

 
  
  
  
  
  
 Change as a % of
Consolidated Operating Income
 Change as a % of
Segment Operating Income
 
 
 North
America
 Europe China Corp. Total North
America
 Europe China Corp. Total North
America
 Europe China Corp. 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Organic

 $(8.2)$(9.4)$1.6 $(3.4)$(19.4) (8.3)% (9.5)% 1.6% (3.5)% (19.7)% (12.1)% (14.4)% 20.8% (12.5)%

Foreign exchange

  (0.7) (1.3)     (2.0) (0.7) (1.3)     (2.0) (1.0) (2.0)    

Acquisitions

    2.4      2.4    2.4      2.4    3.7     

Disposal

      5.8    5.8      5.9    5.9      75.3   

Restructuring, goodwill and other

  19.7  (6.4) (6.3) (0.2) 6.8  20.0  (6.5) (6.4) (0.2) 6.9  29.1  (9.7) (81.8) (0.7)
                              

Total

 $10.8 $(14.7)$1.1 $(3.6)$(6.4) 11.0% (14.9)% 1.1% (3.7)% (6.5)% 16.0% (22.4)% (14.3)% (13.2)%
                              

        

Internally our North American segment experienced aThe decrease in consolidated organic operating income was due primarily from increased commodity costs and increased SG&A expenses,to recessionary unit volume sales declines partially offset by benefits resultingstronger gross margins from our completed manufacturing restructuring projects and outsourcing. In 2005, we experiencedlower raw material costs and from reductions in variable SG&A expenses such as commissions and shipping costs and from cost increases, which we were not ablesavings derived from various cost reduction programs. Corporate costs increased due to fully recover through price increases on someincreased legal and pension costs, partially offset by the recovery of past legal expenses. The Blücher acquisition accounts for the net increase in operating profits from acquisitions. China's improved organic operating profit was due to operational improvements at one of our products. For 2005, we recorded $1,005,000 for net costs associated with our manufacturing restructuring plan compared to $2,968,000 for 2004. The acquired growth ismore significant facilities. China's operating profit from disposal was due to the inclusiondivestiture of operating income from Dormont, Core, Savard, Alamo, HF, Sea Tech and Orion. Other represents costs accrued for an earn-out arrangement from a prior period acquisition. This earn-out arrangement was completed on August 31, 2005.TWT.

The increase in operating income due to foreign exchange in North America is due to the Canadian dollar appreciating against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the Canadian dollar will continue to appreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net sales.

Internally our European segment also experienced a decrease in operating income. This was primarily due to a soft European economy, increased sales in lower margin wholesale products and increased SG&A expenses, offset by benefits resulting from our completed manufacturing restructuring projects and outsourcing. For 2005, we recorded $1,540,000 for costs associated with our manufacturing restructuring plan and we did not record any costs for 2004.

The decrease in Europe’s operating income from foreign exchange iswas primarily due to the depreciation of the euro against the U.S. dollar and, to a lesser extent, the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. We cannot predict whether the eurothese currencies will continue toappreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our operating income.

        Interest Income.    Interest income decreased $4.2 million, or 82.4%, in 2009 compared to 2008. This decrease was primarily a result of lower market interest rates.

        Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased $4.2 million, or 16.0%, in 2009 compared to 2008, primarily due to a decrease in the average variable rates charged on the revolving credit facility and to a reduction in the amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility.

        Other (Income) Expense.    Other expense decreased $10.7 million in 2009 compared to 2008, primarily because foreign currency transactions resulted in gains in 2009, while in 2008 losses were realized as a result of foreign currency movements primarily in Europe.

        Income Taxes.    Our effective rate for continuing operations increased to 43.3% from 36.3% in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase was primarily due to previously realized tax benefits in China, which are expected to be recaptured as a result of our decision to restructure our operations and intangible asset impairments that were not tax deductible. In North America, less tax exempt interest income was generated in 2009 as compared with 2008.

        Net Income From Continuing Operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.    Net income from continuing operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. in 2009 was $41.0 million, or $1.10 per common share, compared to $45.2 million, or $1.23 per common share, in 2008. Results for 2009 included after-tax charges totaling $18.1 million, or $0.49 per share, related to restructuring programs compared to an after-tax charge of $3.9 million, or $0.10 per share, for 2008. Also, results for 2009 included a non-cash net after-tax charge of $2.6 million, or $0.07 cents per share, to write off certain intangible assets. In 2008, net loss and loss from continuing operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. included a non-cash after-tax charge of $17.3 million, or $0.47 cents per share, to write-off goodwill for one reporting unit. The depreciation of the euro and Canadian dollar against



the U.S. dollar resulted in a negative impact on our operations of $0.03 per common share in 2009 compared to last year. We cannot predict whether the euro, Canadian dollar or Chinese yuan will appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar in future periods or whether future foreign exchange rate fluctuations will have a positive or negative impact on our net income.

        Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations.    The income (loss) from discontinued operations was primarily attributable to the deconsolidation of TEAM and the loss on the disposal and loss from operations of CWV offset by the resolution of the James Jones Litigation as described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as described in Part I, Item 1. "Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters."

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007

        Net Sales.    Our net sales in each of these segments for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:

 
 Year Ended
December 31, 2008
 Year Ended
December 31, 2007
  
  
 
 
  
 Change to
Consolidated
Net Sales
 
 
 Net Sales % Sales Net Sales % Sales Change 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

North America

 $866.2  60.5%$871.0  64.2%$(4.8) (0.4)%

Europe

  532.0  37.2  439.8  32.4  92.2  6.8 

China

  33.2  2.3  45.5  3.4  (12.3) (0.9)
              

Total

 $1,431.4  100.0%$1,356.3  100.0%$75.1  5.5%
              

        The change in net sales is attributable to the following:

 
  
  
  
  
 Change as a % of
Consolidated Net Sales
 Change as a % of
Segment Net Sales
 
 
 North
America
 Europe China Total North
America
 Europe China Total North
America
 Europe China 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Organic

 $(18.2)$11.2 $(12.1)$(19.1) (1.3)% 0.9% (0.9)% (1.3)% (2.1)% 2.5% (26.6)%

Foreign exchange

  0.5  30.2  3.0  33.7    2.2  0.2  2.4    6.9  6.6 

Acquisitions

  12.9  50.8    63.7  0.9  3.7    4.6  1.5  11.6   

Disposal

      (3.2) (3.2)     (0.2) (0.2)     (7.0)
                        

Total

 $(4.8)$92.2 $(12.3)$75.1  (0.4)% 6.8% (0.9)% 5.5% (0.6)% 21.0% (27.0)%
                        

        Organic net sales for 2008 decreased in North America primarily due to decreased sales in the wholesale market, where sales were 2.5% lower than in 2007. Unit sale declines, due in large part to the soft economy, were widespread across a number of product lines, with our backflow product line impacted the most. Organic sales in our North American retail market for 2008 remained relatively flat compared with 2007, decreasing 0.6%. Unit sale reductions in the retail market due to the soft economy were offset by selected price increases and new product rollouts. Growth in North America due to acquisitions is due to the inclusion of sales from Topway Global Inc. (Topway), acquired in November 2007.

        Organic net sales for 2008 increased in Europe primarily due to an 11.0% increase in sales into the European OEM market as compared to 2007. OEM sales were positively affected in Germany where sales of our products into alternative energy and energy conservation markets were strong. Sales into the wholesale market for 2008 decreased by 4.5% as compared to 2007 and were negatively affected by declines in construction activity. Acquired sales growth in Europe was due to the inclusion of Blücher for seven months in 2008.

        Organic net sales for 2008 declined in China due to decreased sales in both the Chinese domestic and export markets. China sales were also negatively affected as compared to 2007 from the disposal of a commodity butterfly valve business during the fourth quarter of 2008. This decrease was partially



offset by an increase in sales of large diameter butterfly valves to our water infrastructure customers during 2008.

        The increases in net sales due to foreign exchange in North America, Europe and China were primarily due to the appreciation of the Canadian dollar, euro and yuan, respectively, against the U.S. dollar.

        Gross Profit.    Gross profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales (gross margin) for 2008 and 2007 were as follows:

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2008 2007 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Gross profit

 $481.8 $454.2 

Gross margin

  33.7% 33.5%

        Gross margin improved by 20 basis points to 33.7% in 2008 compared to 2007. The improvement was attributable primarily to margin improvements in North America and Europe offset by declines in China. North America's margin improved 70 basis points to 34.4% primarily due to the price increases implemented to offset prior raw material cost increases and, to a lesser extent, the mix of products sold. North American gross margins in 2007 were negatively affected by approximately $6.5 million, or approximately 100 basis points on the prior year gross margin, for charges associated with product discontinuances and a change in estimate for workers' compensation costs. Gross margin in Europe increased to 32.8% from 31.4% primarily due to our ability to leverage additional volume from alternative energy product sales with better factory absorption levels due to the rationalization efforts made over the last two years in Italy. China gross margin deteriorated when compared to 2007 primarily due to excess capacity due to sales declines, value added tax increases, negative impact from the increase in the value of the Chinese yuan against the U.S. dollar and disruptions from a plant move and labor disputes.

        Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A expenses, for 2008 increased $28.6 million, or 8.7%, compared to 2007. The increase in internal growth in China of $1,622,000SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to increased capacity utilization and low cost sourcing to our domestic facilities offset by increasedthe following:

 
 (in millions) % Change 

Organic

 $4.0  1.2%

Foreign exchange

  8.0  2.5 

Acquisitions

  17.8  5.4 

Disposal

  (1.2) (0.4)
      

Total

 $28.6  8.7%
      

        The organic increase in SG&A expenses was primarily relateddue to increased incentive compensation costs and increased variable European selling expenses due to increased sales volumes partially offset by decreased shipping costs and increased bad debt reserves.


other variable North American selling expenses due to decreased sales volumes. The increase in internalSG&A expenses from foreign exchange was primarily due to the appreciation of the euro, yuan and Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. The increase in SG&A expenses from acquisitions was due to the inclusion of Blücher and Topway. Total SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, was 24.8% in 2008 compared to 24.1% 2007.

        Restructuring and Other Charges.    In 2008, we recorded $5.6 million for severance, asset write-downs and accelerated depreciation in North America, China and Europe. In 2007, we recorded $3.2 million for asset write-downs, accelerated depreciation and severance in North America and China.


        Goodwill and Other Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment Charges.    The goodwill impairment charge in 2008 of approximately $22.0 million related to our water quality business unit in North America. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for additional information regarding the impairment.

        Operating Income.    Operating income by geographic segment for 2008 and 2007 was as follows:

 
 Years Ended  
  
 
 
  
 % Change to
Consolidated
Operating
Income
 
 
 December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007 Change 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

North America

 $67.8 $93.3 $(25.5) (20.6)%

Europe

  65.7  53.2  12.5  10.1 

China

  (7.7) 6.6  (14.3) (11.5)

Corporate

  (27.2) (29.1) 1.9  1.5 
          

Total

 $98.6 $124.0 $(25.4) (20.5)%
          

        The change in operating income in Corporate of $1,149,000 is primarily attributable to reductionsthe following:

 
  
  
  
  
  
 Change as a % of
Consolidated Operating Income
 Change as a % of
Segment Operating Income
 
 
 North
America
 Europe China Corp. Total North
America
 Europe China Corp. Total North
America
 Europe China Corp. 
 
 (Dollars in millions)
 

Organic

 $(2.1)$6.1 $(17.2)$1.9 $(11.3) (1.7)% 4.9% (13.9)% 1.5% (9.2)% (2.3)% 11.5% (260.6)% 6.5%

Foreign exchange

    3.9  (0.6)   3.3    3.2  (0.4)   2.8    7.3  (9.1)  

Acquisitions

  (0.6) 2.7      2.1  (0.5) 2.2      1.7  (0.6) 5.1     

Disposal

      0.8    0.8      0.6    0.6      12.1   

Restructuring, goodwill and other

  (22.8) (0.2) 2.7    (20.3) (18.4) (0.2) 2.2    (16.4) (24.4) (0.4) 40.9   
                              

Total

 $(25.5)$12.5 $(14.3)$1.9 $(25.4) (20.6)% 10.1% (11.5)% 1.5% (20.5)% (27.3)% 23.5% (216.7)% 6.5%
                              

        The decrease in SOXconsolidated organic operating income was due primarily to underutilization of capacity, in both China and, auditto a lesser extent, in North America caused by recessionary unit volume declines and one-off events in China such as the labor strike and a plant move. Also, SG&A expenses such as salaries, product liability costs and other fixed spending increased. These items were partially offset by a $1,000,000 reserve reductionhigher sales and better productivity in Europe and reductions in certain SG&A expenses such as shipping, pension costs and bad debts. Corporate costs decreased as the first quarterresult of 2004lower benefit costs, including lower stock-based compensation and reduced costs from our nonqualified deferred compensation plan, and lower costs related to our Sarbanes Oxley compliance efforts and reduced legal costs.

        The Blücher acquisition accounts for the net increase in operating profits from acquisitions.

        The net increase in operating income from foreign exchange was primarily due to a favorable ruling in a legal matter. Other consiststhe appreciation of $724,000 of adjustments made in the fourth quarter of 2004 to correct errors for accrued expenses.euro against the U.S. dollar.

        Interest Income.    Interest income decreased $9.4 million, or 64.8%, in 2008 compared to 2007, primarily due to cash used to fund the Blücher acquisition and the stock buy-back program initiated in November 2007, as well as, a lower interest rate environment in 2008 as compared to 2007.

Interest Expense.Interest expense decreased $211,000,$0.9 million, or 2.0%3.3%, for 2005in 2008 compared to 2004,2007, primarily due to reduced debt levelslower outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility partially offset by an increase in Europe. Debt levelsthe average variable rates charged on the revolving credit facility.


        Other (Income) Expense.    Other expense increased $7.2 million, or 313.0%, in 2008 compared to 2007, primarily due to foreign currency transaction losses, losses on metal commodity transactions and negative changes in asset valuation of our nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Foreign currency transaction losses increased in the U.S., but not until December 2005,China, Europe and Canada in 2008 as a result of the fourth quarter acquisition activity.

Effective July 1, 2005, we entered into a three-year interest rate swap with a counter party for a notional amount of 25,000,000, which is outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility. We swapped the three-month EURIBOR plus 0.6% for a fixed rate of 3.02%. The impact of the swap was immaterialcompared to the overall interest expense.

We had previously entered into an interest rate swap for a notional amount of 25,000,000 outstanding on our prior revolving credit facility. We swapped the three-month EURIBOR plus 0.7%, for a fixed rate of 2.3%. The swap was terminated at June 30, 2005. The impact of the swap was immaterial to the overall interest expense.2007.

Income Taxes.Our effective tax rate for continuing operations for 2005 increased to 35.9%36.3% for 2008 from 32.9%33.2% for 2004.2007. The main driver of the increase was goodwill impairment. A portion of the goodwill relates to stock acquisitions, which when impaired is primarilynot tax deductible. Our European effective rate declined due to provision releases and favorable tax treatments related to the benefits realized in 2004 of approximately $800,000 for previously unrecognized deferred tax assets in China. In addition in 2004 we recorded multi-year refund claims relating to state tax credits; in 2005 those tax credits were realized for the current year only. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in our European tax rate for 2005 compared to 2004 due to earnings mix in Europe.Blücher acquisition financing.

        Net Income From Continuing Operations.Operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.Income    Net income from continuing operations for 2005 increased $6,282,000,attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. in 2008 decreased $30.5 million, or 12.9%40.3%, to $55,020,000,$45.2 million, or $1.67$1.23 per common share, from $48,738,000,$75.7 million, or $1.49$1.94 per common share, for 2004,2007, in each case, on a diluted basis. Repurchased shares had an accretive impact of $0.07 per common share in 2008. Income from continuing operations included an after-tax goodwill impairment charge of $17.3 million, or $0.47 per common share, for 2008. Income from continuing operations for 20052007 included a tax refund of $1.9 million, or $0.05 per common share. Income from continuing operations for 2008 and 2004 includes2007 included costs, net costs incurred forof tax, from our manufacturing restructuring plan, reduction-in-force and product line discontinuances of $1,633,000,$3.9 million, or ($0.05)$0.10 per common share, and $1,825,000,$5.1 million, or ($0.06)$0.13 per common share, respectively. Also includedThe appreciation of the euro, Chinese yuan and Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar resulted in a positive impact on income from continuing operations for 2004 is the net charge of $2,289,000, or ($0.07) per share, for accounting corrections relating to certain accrued expenses.

Loss From Discontinued Operations   We recorded a charge net of tax to discontinued operations for 2005 of $421,000, or ($0.01) per common share, and $1,918,000, or ($0.06)$0.07 per common share for 2004, in each case, on a diluted basis. Included in loss2008 compared to the comparable period last year.

        Income From Discontinued Operations.    Income from discontinued operations for 20052008 and 2004 are charges2007 was primarily attributable to the operating income of CWV and TEAM being partially offset by increased legal fees associated with the James Jones litigation and obligations to the former shareholders of the James Jones Company of $421,000, or ($0.01) per share, and $1,125,000, or ($0.04) per share, respectively. SeeLitigation, as described in Part I, Item 1, “Business—1. "Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters.” Additionally, losses from discontinued operations for 2004 include an impairment charge and an operating loss totaling $793,000, or ($0.02) per share, for the divesture of our interest in Jameco LLC."

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We        In 2009, we generated $82,231,000$204.6 million of cash from operating activities as compared to $145.0 million in 2008. We generated approximately $181.2 million of free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure, which we reconcile below, defined as net cash provided by continuing operating activities minus capital expenditures plus proceeds from sale of assets), which compares favorably to free cash flow of $119.9 million in 2008. Free cash flow as a percentage of net income from continuing operations for 2006. We experienced an increaseattributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. was 442% in inventory and accounts receivable2009 as compared to 265% in North America, Europe and China. The increase in accounts receivable of $16,957,000 was2008 primarily due to increased sales volumebetter working capital management, temporary decreases in commodity costs, cash containment measures and selling prices. The increase in inventorycareful monitoring of $37,293,000 was primarily due to increased cost of raw materials and planned increases in European safety stocks. The increase in inventory and accounts receivable was partially offset by increased accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $29,524,000.our capital spending.

We        In 2009, we used $119,213,000$21.3 million of net cash forfrom investing activities in 2006.primarily for purchases of capital equipment. We used $91,093,000expect to fund the acquisitions of Changsha, ATS, Calflex and Ningbo, Kimsafe and Teknigas, $1,940,000 in additional costs


related to 2005 acquisitions and $387,000 to complete the planned increase of our ownership in Stern. We invested $11,825,000 in investment grade auction rate securities. We invested $44,648,000invest approximately $31.0 in capital equipment. Capital expenditures consisted of approximately $26,648,000 for manufacturing machinery and equipment in 2010 as part of our ongoing commitment to improve our manufacturing capabilities and approximately $18,000,000 for the purchase of land and building and for infrastructure improvements for a site in Italy. We subsequently entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with respect to the building.capabilities. We received proceeds of $31,867,000, which primarily included $15,957,000$1.7 million from the sale of auction rate securities. We received $1.1 million of cash for a purchase price settlement related to a prior-year acquisition. We paid $0.4 million for earn-out payments related to an acquisition from prior years.

        As of December 31, 2009, we held $5.4 million in investments with an auction reset feature, or auction rate securities (ARS), with a total par value of $6.6 million. At the sale-leasebacktime of purchase, all the auction rate securities carried an AAA credit rating. These auction rate securities are all long-term debt obligations secured by municipal bonds and student loans. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we elected to participate in Italy and $13,414,000a settlement offer by UBS AG (UBS). Under the terms of the settlement, we were issued rights by UBS. Each right entitles the holder to sell the underlying ARS at par to UBS at any time during the period June 30, 2010, through July 2, 2012. UBS could elect at anytime from the sales



settlement date through July 2, 2012 to purchase the ARS at par value. The rights are valued at $1.1 million at December 31, 2009.

        Liquidity for these ARS is typically provided by an auction process, which allows holders to sell their notes and resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually every 7 to 35 days. Each of two facilitiesthe auction rate securities in northern Italy.our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2009 has experienced failed auctions. There is no assurance that future auctions for these securities will succeed. We also received proceeds from two buildings held for sale, totaling approximately $2,496,000 during 2006.have classified the investment in ARS and the UBS rights as short-term investments as we will exercise our right to put the ARS on UBS at par on the earliest date possible.

        We expect to invest approximately $38,000,000 in capital equipment in 2007.

We generated $332,091,000used $77.2 million of net cash from financing activities for 2006. On November 21, 2006, we completed a public offering of 5,750,000 shares of newly issued Class A common stock at $40.00 per share. Net proceeds were approximately $218,611,000 after taking into account underwriting discounts and expenses associated with the transaction. Additionally, we generated cash through the completion of our $225,000,000 private placement of 5.85% notes in April 2006, increased borrowings under our line of credit for use in Europe and proceeds from the exercise of stock options, partially offset byduring 2009. This was primarily due to payments of debt and dividend payments and debt issue costs.payments.

In April 2006, we amended our        We maintain a $350.0 million revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks to provide for multi-currency unsecured borrowings and stand-by letters of credit of up to $350,000,000 and to extend the maturity date through April 2011. The original facility provided $300,000,000 in borrowings and would have expired in September 2009. The revolving credit facility is being used to support our acquisition program, working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes.

Outstanding indebtedness under the revolving credit facility bears interest at a rate determined by the type of loan plus an applicable margin determined by our debt rating, depending on the applicable base rate and our bond rating. For 20062009, the average interest rate under the revolving credit facility for euro-based borrowings was approximately 3.5%2.2%. There were no U.S. dollar borrowings under the credit facility at December 31, 2006. The2009.

Covenant compliance

        Under our revolving credit facility, includes operationalwe are required to satisfy and maintain specified financial covenants customary for facilities of this type, including, among others, restrictions on additional indebtedness, liensratios and investments and maintenance of certain leverage ratios.other financial condition tests. As of December 31, 2006,2009, we were in compliance with all covenants related to the revolving credit facility. The financial ratios include a consolidated interest coverage ratio based on consolidated earnings before income taxes, interest expense, depreciation, and amortization ("Consolidated EBITDA") to consolidated interest expense, as defined in the revolving credit facility agreement. Our revolving credit facility defines Consolidated EBITDA to exclude unusual or non-recurring charges and gains. In addition, the definition excludes charges or gains associated with certain discontinued operations. We are also required to maintain a consolidated leverage ratio of consolidated funded debt to Consolidated EBITDA. Consolidated funded debt, as defined in the revolving credit facility agreement, includes all long and short-term debt, capital lease obligations and any trade letters of credit that are outstanding. Finally, we are required to maintain a consolidated net worth that exceeds a minimum net worth calculation. Consolidated net worth is defined as the total stockholders' equity as reported adjusted for any cumulative translation adjustments.

        As of December 31, 2009, our actual financial ratios calculated in accordance with our revolving credit facility compared to the required levels under our revolving credit facility were as follows:


Actual RatioRequired Level

Minimum level

Interest Charge Coverage Ratio

6.70 to 1.003.50 to 1.00

Maximum level

Leverage Ratio

2.51 to 1.003.25 to 1.00

Minimum level

Consolidated Net Worth

$857.2 million$745.4 million

        As of December 31, 2009, our actual financial ratio calculated in accordance with our senior note agreements compared to the required levels under our senior note agreements were as follows:


Actual RatioRequired Level

Minimum level

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio

4.87 to 1.002.00 to 1.00

        In addition to the above financial ratios, the revolving credit facility and senior note agreements contain affirmative and negative covenants that include limitations on disposition or sale of assets, prohibitions on assuming or incurring any liens on assets with limited exceptions and limitations on making investments other than those permitted by the agreements.

        We have several note agreements as further detailed in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These note agreements require us to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of consolidated EBITDA plus consolidated rent expense during the period to consolidated fixed charges. Consolidated fixed charges are the sum of consolidated interest expense for the period and consolidated rent expense.

        As of December 31, 2009, we had $226,300,000$314.4 million of unused and potentially available credit under the revolving credit facility and had $91,059,000 of euro-based borrowings outstanding and $32,641,000$35.6 million for stand-by letters of credit outstanding on our revolving credit facility.

Effective July 1, 2005, Due primarily to the consolidated leverage ratio, we entered into a three-year interest rate swap with a counter party for a notional amount of 25,000,000, which was outstandingcould borrow approximately $108.5 million under the original revolvingexisting facility, excluding the stand-by-letters of credit, facility.before we would violate one of the above covenants.

        We swapped the three-month EURIBOR plus 0.6% for a fixed rate of 3.02%. The swap was terminated on October 3, 2006.

We generated $903,000used $21.2 million of net cash byfrom operating activities of discontinued operations from discontinued operations. During 2006, we received approximately $16,500 in cash as an indemnification payment for2009 primarily due to the settlement costs we incurred in the James Jones Litigation. This cash has been recorded as a liability at December 31, 2006 because of the possibility that we might have to reimburse the insurance company if it is ultimately successful with a future appeal. We also received approximately $2,783,000 in cash for reimbursement of defense costs$15.3 million related to the James Jones Litigation. During 2006,litigation. In addition, separate from the settlement, we paid approximately $600,000our outside counsel an additional $5.0 million for defense costs and approximately $530,000 for indemnity costs we incurredservices rendered in connection with the James Jones Litigation.litigation.

        We used $0.3 million of net cash from investing activities of discontinued operations in 2009 primarily due to purchasing capital equipment.

Working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) as of December 31, 20062009 was $653,024,000$489.8 million compared to $305,092,000$497.8 million as of December 31, 2005.2008. This increase isdecrease was primarily due to increasesreductions in cash, inventoriesinventory and accounts receivable.receivable and the classification of our $50 million 4.87% notes due in May 2010 to current liabilities offset by the increase in cash. Although, we are currently exploring alternatives in refinancing these notes, we have the ability to pay off this debt with our available cash. Cash and cash equivalents increased to $342,979,000$258.2 million as of December 31, 20062009 compared to $45,758,000$165.6 million as of December 31, 20052008 primarily due to the Class A


common stock public offering, residual proceeds from the completion of the $225,000,000 private placementfewer acquisitions costs in 2009 and from cash generated by operations.to better working capital management. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 3.22.6 to 1 as of December 31, 20062009 compared to 2.42.7 to 1 as of December 31, 2005.2008.

We2008 Cash Flows

        In 2008, we generated $51,867,000$145.0 million of cash from continuing operationsoperating activities as compared to $90.0 million in 2005. We experienced an increase2007. With management's enhanced focus in 2008 on working capital management, net working capital cash outflows decreased from $22.8 million in 2007, to a net working capital cash inflow of $45.5 million in 2008, a $68.3 million positive change. Better overall management of our inventory, accounts receivable in North America, Europe and China totaling  $16,546,000. This increase is primarily due to increased sales volume. Additionally, we experienced an increase in inventories in North America, Europe and China totaling $20,330,000. A portion of the overall increase in inventory is due to the increased costs of raw materials. The increase in inventory in Europe is primarily due to increased finished goods to support the delivery requirements of OEM customers in Europe and an increase in safety stocks during restructuring. North American and China inventories increased primarily due to the incremental volume of products being sourced from our extended China supply chain. The increase in inventory and accounts receivablepayable drove the improvement in working capital. This change was partially offset to some extent by increased accounts payable of approximately $14,257,000.lower income from continuing operations.

We used $183,203,000$170.0 million of net cash for investing activities in 2005.2008. We used $191,396,000approximately $167.9 million of net cash to fund the acquisitionsacquisition of Dormont, Core, Flexflow, Savard, Microflex, Alamo, Electro Controls, HFBlücher and Sea Tech.we spent $7.6 million for acquisition costs related to prior years acquisitions. We received proceeds of $33.3 million from the sale of auction rate securities. We invested $26.2 million in capital equipment as part of our ongoing commitment to improve our manufacturing capabilities.


        We used $92.4 million of net cash from financing activities in 2008. This was primarily due to payments for our stock repurchase program, payments of debt and dividend payments, partially offset by increased borrowings under our line of credit.

        We generated $0.8 million of net cash from operating activities of discontinued operations in 2008 primarily attributable to TEAM and CWV partially offset by approximately $1.2 million for defense and other legal costs we incurred in the James Jones Litigation. We also received $1.3 million for reimbursements of defense costs.

        We used $2.2 million of net cash from investing activities of discontinued operations in 2008 primarily due to acquisition costs related to TEAM and to purchase capital equipment.

2007 Cash Flows

        We generated $90.0 million of cash from operating activities in 2007. We experienced increases in inventory in North America and China. The increases were primarily due to increased raw material costs. There was also a decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, primarily in Europe and North America. In Europe, accounts payable declined in 2007 due to a decline in inventory. In North America, payments for cash compensation increased in 2007. Also, cash payments to cover income tax obligations were greater during 2007. Accounts receivable decreased in all three segments.

        We used $84.7 million of net cash for investing activities in 2007. We invested $18,590,000$36.9 million in capital equipment. Capital expenditures were primarily for manufacturing machinery and equipment as part of our ongoing commitment to improve our manufacturing capabilities. We generated $26,600,000 byinvested $27.5 million in auction rate securities. We used $18.1 million to fund the saleacquisition of investment securities.Topway. We paid $3.2 million for additional acquisition costs related to prior years acquisitions.

We generated $112,924,000used $66.5 million of net cash from financing activities in 20052007. This was primarily fromdue to payments of debt, payments for our stock repurchase program and dividend payments, partially offset by increased borrowings in the U.S.under our line of credit and Europe for acquisitions and proceedstax benefits from the exercise of stock options, offset by dividend payments and payments of debt.awards.

        We paid $3,750,000 of debt owed to the former shareholders of Hunter Innovations.

We used $1,050,000generated $1.8 million of net cash from operating activities of discontinued operations in 2007 primarily attributable to CWV and TEAM. We paid approximately $0.5 million for discontinued operations. During 2005, we receiveddefense costs and approximately $548,000 in cash as a settlement payment$0.5 million for indemnificationother legal costs we incurred in the James Jones case. An offsetting liability has been recorded at December 31, 2005 because of the possibility that we might have to reimburse the insurance company if it is ultimately successful with a future appeal.Litigation. We also received approximately $2,100,000$1.0 million in cash for reimbursement of defense costs related to the James Jones case. During 2005, we paid approximately $2,503,000 for defense costs, $550,000 for legal costs and approximately $1,021,000 for indemnity costs we incurred in the James Jones case.payments.

We generated $40,210,000 of cash from continuing operations in 2004. We experienced an increase in inventory in North America and China. The North America increase was primarily due to planned increases in finished goods as we set up additional distribution centers and a lengthened supply chain from producing more products abroad and increased sales volume. In addition, due to the cost increases in certain raw materials, the carrying value of our inventory in North America for 2004 has increased approximately $9,000,000 compared to 2003. Additionally, we experienced an increase in accounts receivable in North America partially offset by a decrease in Europe. The North America increase was primarily due to increased sales volume and timing of certain cash receipts from certain large customers.

We used $111,379,000$2.7 million of net cash from investing activities of discontinued operations in 2004. We invested $20,999,000 in capital equipment. Capital expenditures were primarily for manufacturing machinery and equipment as part of our ongoing commitment to improve our manufacturing capabilities. We received $2,143,000 of proceeds primarily from a sale of one of our North American manufacturing facilities with respect to which we entered into a sale and lease back arrangement. Our business acquisitions, net of cash acquired, consisted of cash purchases of $16,796,000 for the assets of Flowmatic, $5,750,000 for the 40% equity interest in Shida that had been held by our former joint venture partner, $17,247,000 for the TEAM acquisition, $27,873,000 for the Orion acquisition and $787,000 for an additional 34% investment in Watts Stern Rubinetti S.r.l. Additionally, our net investment in securities, primarily investment grade auction rate securities, increased to $26,600,000 in 2004 from $4,000,000 in 2003.


We used $16,526,000 of net cash from financing activities in 2004 primarily for dividend payments, debt repayment in China and $3,750,000 of debt paid to the former shareholders of Hunter Innovations partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises.

We had free cash flow of $57,005,000 (a non-GAAP financial measure defined as net cash provided by continuing operations minus capital expenditures and dividends plus proceeds from sale of assets) during the year ended December 31, 2006 versus free cash flow of $23,449,000 in 2005. This increase in 2006 compared to 2005 was2007 primarily due to growth in cash generated by operations, less netacquisition costs related to CWV and to purchase capital expenditures partially offset by increased dividends.equipment.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

        Our net debt to capitalization ratio (defined(a non-GAAP financial measure, as reconciled below, defined as short and long-term interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents as a percentage of the sum of short and long term interest-bearing liabilities less cash and cash equivalents plus total stockholders’ equity, including minority interest)stockholders' equity) decreased to 11.3%9.9% for 20062009 from 33.1%22.8% for 2005.2008. The decrease resulted from an increase in cash from the Class A common stock public offeringdecreased borrowings under our line of credit and residual proceeds from the completion of the $225,000,000 private placement.increased cash.

We had free cash flow of $23,449,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005 versus free cash flow of $12,283,000 in 2004. This increase in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily due to decreased growth in inventories partially offset by increased accounts receivable.

We believe free cash flow to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating performance because it provides investors with a measure of our ability to generate cash, to repay debt and to fund acquisitions. We may not be comparable to other companies that may define free cash flow differently. Free cash flow does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Therefore it should not be considered an alternative to net cash provided by operations as an indication of our performance. Free cash flow should also not be considered an alternative to net cash provided by operations as defined by GAAP.


A reconciliation of net cash provided by continuing operations to free cash flow is provided below:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net cash provided by continuing operations

 

$

82,231

 

$

51,867

 

$

40,210

 

Less: additions to property, plant, and equipment

 

(44,648

)

(18,590

)

(20,999

)

Plus: proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

31,867

 

652

 

2,143

 

Less: dividends

 

(12,445

)

(10,480

)

(9,071

)

Free cash flow

 

$

57,005

 

$

23,449

 

$

12,283

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net cash provided by continuing operations

 $204.6 $145.0 $90.0 

Less: additions to property, plant, and equipment

  (24.2) (26.2) (36.9)

Plus: proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment

  0.8  1.1  0.6 
        

Free cash flow

 $181.2 $119.9 $53.7 
        

        

Our net debt to capitalization ratio is also a non-GAAP financial measure used by management. Management believes it to be an appropriate supplemental measure because it helps investors understand our ability to meet our financing needs and as a basis to evaluate our financial structure. Our computation may not be comparable to other companies that may define net debt to capitalization differently.

A reconciliation of long-term debt (including current portion) to net debt and our net debt to capitalization ratio is provided below:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

7,522

 

$

13,635

 

Plus: long-term debt, net of current portion

 

441,697

 

293,350

 

Less: cash and cash equivalents

 

(342,979

)

(45,758

)

Net debt

 

$

106,240

 

$

261,227

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Current portion of long-term debt

 $50.9 $4.5 

Plus: long-term debt, net of current portion

  304.0  409.8 

Less: cash and cash equivalents

  (258.2) (165.6)
      

Net debt

 $96.7 $248.7 
      

        


A reconciliation of capitalization is provided below:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net debt

 

$

106,240

 

$

261,227

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

826,553

 

519,476

 

Plus: minority interest

 

5,971

 

7,831

 

Capitalization

 

$

938,764

 

$

788,534

 

Net debt to capitalization ratio

 

11.3

%

33.1

%

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net debt

 $96.7 $248.7 

Total stockholders' equity

  879.6  842.4 
      

Capitalization

 $976.3 $1,091.1 
      

Net debt to capitalization ratio

  9.9% 22.8%
      

Contractual Obligations

        

We anticipate that available funds from current operations, existing cash, our revolving credit facility and other sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet current operating requirements and anticipated capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. However, we may have to consider external sources of financing for any large future acquisitions.

43




Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20062009 are presented in the following table:

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

Contractual Obligations

 

 

 

Total

 

Less than
1 year

 

1-3 years

 

3-5 years

 

More than
5 years

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Long-term debt obligations, including current maturities(a)

 

$

449,219

 

 

$

7,522

 

 

$

444

 

$

141,253

 

$

300,000

 

Operating lease obligations

 

19,037

 

 

5,850

 

 

8,263

 

3,558

 

1,366

 

Capital lease obligations(a)

 

15,318

 

 

1,071

 

 

2,532

 

2,449

 

9,266

 

Pension contributions

 

13,803

 

 

3,691

 

 

1,971

 

178

 

7,963

 

Interest(b)

 

180,619

 

 

24,902

 

 

47,554

 

41,309

 

66,854

 

Earnout payments(a)

 

4,003

 

 

4,003

 

 

 

 

 

Other(c)

 

25,956

 

 

21,582

 

 

1,930

 

1,577

 

867

 

Total

 

$

707,955

 

 

$

68,621

 

 

$

62,694

 

$

190,324

 

$

386,316

 

 
 Payments Due by Period 
Contractual Obligations
 Total Less than
1 year
 1–3 years 3–5 years More than
5 years
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Long-term debt obligations, including current maturities(a)

 $354.9 $50.9 $1.4 $76.5 $226.1 

Operating lease obligations

  29.0  7.8  9.9  6.3  5.0 

Capital lease obligations(a)

  13.6  1.3  2.7  2.7  6.9 

Pension contributions(b)

  34.7  10.6  10.5  0.9  12.7 

Interest(c)

  104.5  19.1  35.6  29.1  20.7 

Earnout payments(a)

  0.5  0.5       

Other (d)

  25.7  22.3  1.5  1.3  0.6 
            

Total

 $562.9 $112.5 $61.6 $116.8 $272.0 
            

(a)
as recognized in the consolidated balance sheet



(b)
Expected pension contributions include amounts to fully fund the defined benefit pension plan through 2011. Potential funding for service costs beyond 2011 are not included in contractual obligations. Those costs are currently estimated at $5 million per year.

(c)
assumes the balance onno borrowings against the revolving credit facility remains at $91,059,000 and the interest rate remains at approximately 4.0% for the presented periods

(c)

(d)
includes commodity, capital expenditure commitments and other benefits at December 31, 2006

2009

We maintain letters of credit that guarantee our performance or payment to third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. Amounts outstanding were approximately $49,637,000$37.0 million as of December 31, 20062009 and $48,651,000$39.3 million as of December 31, 2005.2008. Our letters of credit are primarily associated with insurance coverage and to a lesser extent foreign purchases and generally expire within one year of issuance. These instruments may exist or expire without being drawn down, therefore they do not necessarily represent future cash flow obligations.

We divested our 20% interest in www.plumbworld.co.uk Limited (Plumbworld), a variable interest entity, on August 21, 2006. We had a nominal investment of approximately $500 in Plumbworld and maintained a loan receivable that was paid in full, at which time we relinquished our shares in Plumbworld.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Except for operating lease commitments, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Key Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. A critical accounting estimate is an assumption about highly uncertain matters and could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements if another, also reasonable, amount were used, or, a change in the estimate is reasonably likely from period to period. We base our assumptions on historical experience and on other estimates that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. There were no changes in our accounting policies or significant changes in our accounting estimates during 2006.2009.

We periodically discuss the development, selection and disclosure of the estimates with our Audit Committee. Management believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions.


Revenue recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: (1) we have entered into a binding agreement, (2) the product has shipped and title has passed, (3) the sales price to the customer is fixed or is determinable and (4) collectibilitycollectability is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue based upon a determination that all criteria for revenue recognition have been met, which, based on the majority of our shipping terms, is considered to have occurred upon shipment of the finished product. Some shipping terms require the goods to be received by the customer before title passes. In those instances, revenues are not recognized until the customer has received the goods. We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer returns and allowances and for customer programs. Provisions for returns and allowances are made at the time of sale, derived from historical trends and form a portion of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Customer programs, which are primarily annual volume incentive plans, allow customers to earn credit for attaining agreed upon purchase targets from us. We record estimated reductions to revenue, made at the time of sale, for customer programs as an adjustment to net sales.based on estimated purchase targets.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is established to represent our best estimate of the net realizable value of the outstanding accounts receivable. The development of our allowance for doubtful accounts varies by region but in general is based on a review of past due amounts, historical write-off experience, as well as aging trends affecting specific accounts and general operational factors affecting all accounts. In North America, management specifically analyzes individual accounts receivable and establishes specific reserves against financially troubled customers. In addition, factors are developed utilizing historical trends in bad debts, returns and allowances. The ratio of these factors to sales on a rolling twelve-month basis is applied to total outstanding receivables (net of accounts specifically identified) to establish a reserve. In Europe, management develops theirits bad debt allowance through an aging analysis of all their accounts. In China, management specifically analyzes individual accounts receivable and establishes specific reserves as needed. In addition, for waterworks customers, whose payment terms are generally extended, we reserve the majority of accounts receivable in excess of one year from the invoice date.needed along with providing reserves based on aging analysis.

We uniformly consider current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We also aggressively monitor the creditworthiness of our largest customers, and periodically review customer credit limits to reduce risk. If circumstances relating to specific customers change or unanticipated changes occur in the general business environment, our estimates of the recoverability of receivables could be further adjusted.

Inventory valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with costs generally determined primarily on a first-in first-out basis. We utilize both specific product identification and historical product demand as the basis for determining our excess or obsolete inventory reserve. We identify all inventories that exceed a range of one to four years in sales. This is determined by comparing the current inventory balance against unit sales for the trailing twelve months. New products added to inventory within the past twelve months are excluded from this analysis. A portion of our products contain recoverable materials, therefore the excess and obsolete reserve is established net of any recoverable amounts. Changes in market conditions, lower than expectedlower-than-expected customer demand or changes in technology or features could result in additional obsolete inventory that is not saleable and could require additional inventory reserve provisions.

In certain countries, additional inventory reserves are maintained for potential shrinkage experienced in the manufacturing process. The reserve is established based on the prior year’syear's inventory losses adjusted for any change in the gross inventory balance.


Goodwill and other intangibles

        We have made numerous acquisitions over the years which included the recognition of a significant amount of goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives areis tested annually for impairment in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 “Goodwill and Other


Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). We use judgment in assessing whether assetsannually or more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have become impaired between annualbeen incurred. Application of the goodwill impairment tests. We concluded that no impairment existed at October 29, 2006,test requires judgment, including the timeidentification of reporting units, assignment of assets and liabilities to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. In 2008 and 2009, we estimated the fair value of our latest annual review.reporting units using an income approach based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. We performbelieve this approach yields the most appropriate evidence of fair value as our annual test for indicators of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets impairmentreporting units are not easily compared to other corporations involved in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year or sooner if indicators of impairment exist.similar businesses.

Intangible assets such as purchased technology are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. Values assigned to intangible assets are determined by an independent valuation firm based on our estimates and judgments regarding expectations of the success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. As of our October 25, 2009 testing date, we determined we had seven reporting units in continuing operations, one which had no goodwill.

Since        We review goodwill for impairment utilizing a two-step process. The first step of the adoptionimpairment test requires a comparison of FAS 142the fair value of each of our valuations have been greater thanreporting units to the respective carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit is less than its fair value, no indication of impairment exists and a second step is not performed. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is higher than its fair value, there is an indication that an impairment may exist and a second step must be performed. In the second step, the impairment is computed by comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of the goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized for the excess and charged to operations.

        Inherent in our goodwilldevelopment of the present value of future cash flow projections are assumptions and intangibles.estimates derived from a review of our operating results, business plans, expected growth rates, cost of capital and tax rates. We also make certain assumptions about future economic conditions and other market data. We develop our assumptions based on our historical results including sales growth, operating profits, working capital levels and tax rates.

        We believe that the discounted cash flow model is sensitive to the selected discount rate. We use third-party valuation specialists to help develop appropriate discount rates for each reporting unit. We use standard valuation practices to arrive at a weighted average cost of capital based on the market and guideline public companies. The higher the discount rate, the lower the discounted cash flows. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such factors as future sales volume, selling price changes, material cost changes, cost savings programs and capital expenditures could significantly affect our valuations. Other changes that may affect our valuations include, but are not limited to product acceptances and regulatory approval. If actual product acceptance differs significantly fromresult in impairments in the estimates,future.

        During 2009, we may be required to recordrecognized a non-cash pre-tax charge of approximately $3.3 million as an impairment charge to write downof some of the assets to their realizable value. A severe decline in market value could result inindefinite lived intangible assets.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, we recognized an unexpectedaggregate non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $22.0 million related to our water quality business unit within our North America segment. The charge reflected the challenges of the residential construction cycle, as well as the broader economic and credit environment.

        As of our October 25, 2009 testing date, we had approximately $435.8 million of goodwill which could have a material impact on our balance sheet. Our impairment testing indicated that the fair values of the reporting units exceeded the



carrying values, thereby resulting in no impairment. The results of operationsthis impairment analysis are summarized in the table below:

 
 Goodwill balance at
October 25, 2009
 Book value of
reporting unit at
October 25, 2009
 Estimated fair value at
October 25, 2009
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Reporting unit

          

Regulator

 $124.2 $328.2 $406.0 

Europe

  153.3  362.5  422.7 

Blücher

  86.7  159.6  185.4 

Dormont

  39.2  77.7  88.8 

Orion

  24.6  34.2  38.2 

China

  7.8  53.8  83.4 

        The underlying analyses supporting our fair value assessment related to our outlook of the business' long-term performance, which included key assumptions as to the appropriate discount rate and financial position.long-term growth rate. In connection with our October 25, 2009 impairment test, we utilized discount rates ranging from 11.3% to 15% and long-term terminal growth rates from 3% to 5% beyond our planning periods.

Product liability and workers’workers' compensation costs

Because of retention requirements associated with our insurance policies, we are generally self-insured for potential product liability claims and for workers’workers' compensation costs associated with workplace accidents. For product liability cases in the U.S., management estimates expected settlement costs by utilizing loss reports provided by our third-party administrators as well as developing internal historical trend factors based on our specific claims experience. Management utilizes the internal trend factors that reflect final expected settlement costs. In other countries, we maintain insurance coverage with relatively high deductible payments, as product liability claims tend to be smaller than those experienced in the U.S. Changes in the nature of claims or the actual settlement amounts could affect the adequacy of this estimate and require changes to the provisions. Because the liability is an estimate, the ultimate liability may be more or less than reported.

Workers’        Workers' compensation liabilities in the U.S. are recognized for claims incurred (including claims incurred but not reported) and for changes in the status of individual case reserves. At the time a workers’workers' compensation claim is filed, a liability is estimated to settle the claim. The liability for workers’workers' compensation claims is determined based on management’smanagement's estimates of the nature and severity of the claims and based on analysis provided by third partythird-party administrators and by various state statutes and reserve requirements. We have developed our own trend factors based on our specific claims experience.experience, discounted based on risk-free interest rates. In other countries where workers’workers' compensation costs are applicable, we maintain insurance coverage with limited deductible payments. Because the liability is an estimate, the ultimate liability may be more or less than reported.reported and is subject to changes in discount rates.

        We determine the trend factors for product liability and workers' compensation liabilities based on consultation with outside actuaries.

We maintain excess liability insurance with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in excess of all self-insured positions. Any material change in the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on our operating results.

Legal contingencies

We are a defendant in numerous legal matters including those involving environmental law and product liability as discussed further in “Business—more detail in Part I, Item 1. "Business—Product Liability, Environmental and Other Litigation Matters." As required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies” (FAS 5),GAAP, we determine whether an



estimated loss from a loss contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and the loss amount can be reasonably estimated,


net of any applicable insurance proceeds. Estimates of potential outcomes of these contingencies are developed in consultation with outside counsel. While this assessment is based upon all available information, litigation is inherently uncertain and the actual liability to fully resolve this litigation cannot be predicted with any assurance of accuracy. Final settlementresolution of these matters could possibly result in significant effects on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

Pension benefits

We account for our pension plans in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87 “Employers Accounting for Pensions” (FAS 87)GAAP, which involves recording a liability or asset based on the projected benefit obligation and Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendmentthe fair value of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) ,” (FAS 158). In applying FAS 87 and FAS 158, assumptionsplan assets. Assumptions are made regarding the valuation of benefit obligations and the performance of plan assets. The primary assumptions are as follows:

    ·Weighted average discount rate—this rate is used to estimate the current value of future benefits. This rate is adjusted based on movement in long-term interest rates.

    ·

    Expected long-term rate of return on assets—this rate is used to estimate future growth in investments and investment earnings. The expected return is based upon a combination of historical market performance and anticipated future returns for a portfolio reflecting the mix of equity, debt and other investments indicative of our plan assets.

    ·

    Rates of increase in compensation levels—this rate is used to estimate projected annual pay increases, which are used to determine the wage base used to project employees’employees' pension benefits at retirement.

We determine these assumptions based on consultation with outside actuaries and investment advisors. Any variance in these assumptions could have a significant impact on future recognized pension costs, assets and liabilities.

Income taxes

We estimate and use our expected annual effective income tax rates to accrue income taxes. Effective tax rates are determined based on budgeted earnings before taxes, including our best estimate of permanent items that will affect the effective rate for the year. Management periodically reviews these rates with outside tax advisors and changes are made if material discrepanciesvariances from expectations are identified.

We recognize deferred taxes for the expected future consequences of events that have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with the rules of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes” (FAS 109). Under FAS 109, deferredstatements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the book values and tax bases of particular assets and liabilities, using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider estimated future taxable income and ongoing prudent tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.


New Accounting Standards

In February 2007,October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement (FAS) No. 159, “The Fair Value Optionan accounting standard update to improve disclosures related to fair value measurements. This update will require new disclosures when significant transfers in and out of the various fair value levels occur. This update will require a reconciliation for Financial Assetsfair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) be prepared on a gross basis, separately presenting information about purchases, sales, issuance and Financial Liabilities—including an Amendment to FAS No. 115,” (FAS 159) which permits entities to chose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. FAS 159 issettlements. In addition, this update will amend current disclosure requirements for postretirement benefit plan assets. This update will be effective for financial statements issuedinterim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures regarding level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal


years. Earlier application is encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact of FAS 159 on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB 108), which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The impact of SAB 108 was not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (FAS 158), which requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status; (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year; and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes will be reported in other comprehensive income. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 20062010, and for companies with publicly traded equity securities. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, although earlier adoption is permitted. As a result of the requirement to recognize the funded status of our benefit plans as of December 31, 2006, we recorded an increase in our pension liability of approximately $8,300,000, a decrease of approximately $1,300,000 in other assets: other, net and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $5,800,000, net of tax.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged providedWe are evaluating the impact that the reporting company has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. Wethis update will have but do not expect the adoption of FAS 157 willto have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, theOctober 2009, FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48), which clarifies thean accounting standard update to address accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized inmultiple-deliverable arrangements, specifically addressing how to separate deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. This update established a hierarchy for determining the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits. This interpretation also provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and the impact is not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (FAS 156). FAS 156 amends FAS Statement No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. FAS 156 addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities and provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. We adopted FAS 156 as of January 1, 2007 and the impact is not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (FAS 155). FAS 155 amends FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” and FAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers


and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” and allows an entity to remeasure at fair value a hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation from the host, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the instrument would be recognized in earnings. We adopted FAS 155 as of January 1, 2007 and the impact is not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued FAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Correction Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (FAS 154). FAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” (APB 20), and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reportingselling price of a change in accounting principle. APB 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changingdeliverable. This standard also expands disclosures relating to the new accounting principle. FAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle. FAS 154 defines retrospective application as the application of a different accounting principle to prior accounting periods as if that principle had always been used. FAS 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle. The impact of FAS 154 was not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (FAS 153). The amendments made by FAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion No. 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. The statemententity's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This update is effective prospectively for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurringall arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance. The impact of FAS 153 was not material to our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (FAS 151). FAS 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for inventory costs. The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.2010. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact of FAS 151 was not material toon our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, FASB issued a new standard which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This standard also establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in the preparation of non-governmental financial statements. This standard is effective for all interim and annual financial statements issued after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, FASB issued a new standard which requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether the variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest. This statement also requires an entity to regularly reassess whether the entity has a controlling financial interest in the variable interest or interests. This statement will also expand disclosures on variable interest or interests in the footnotes. This standard is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 as well as the interim period therein. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, FASB issued a new standard which eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity as defined in other GAAP literature. This statement also establishes more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale and changes the initial measurement of a transferor's interest in transferred financial assets. This statement expands disclosures for interim and annual reports and is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements


Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We use derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce exposure to adverse fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and costs of certain raw materials used in the manufacturing process. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As a matter of policy, all derivative positions are used to reduce risk by hedging underlying economic exposure. The derivatives we use are instruments with liquid markets.

Our consolidated earnings, which are reported in United States dollars, are subject to translation risks due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This risk is concentrated in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the euro; the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar; and the U.S. dollar and the Chinese yuan.

Our foreign subsidiaries transact most business, including certain intercompany transactions, in foreign currencies. Such transactions are principally purchases or sales of materials and are denominated in European currencies or the U.S. or Canadian dollar. We use foreign currency forward exchange


contracts to manage the risk related to intercompany purchases that occur during the course of a year and certain open foreign currency denominated commitments to sell products to third parties. For 2006,2009, the amounts recorded in other income for the change in the fair value of such contracts was immaterial.

We have historically had a very low exposure on the cost of our debt to changes in interest rates. Interest rate swaps are used to mitigate the impact of interest rate fluctuations on certain variable rate debt instruments and reduce interest expense on certain fixed rate instruments. Information about our long-term debt including principal amounts and related interest rates appears in noteNote 11 of notesNotes to consolidated financial statementsthe Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.2009.

We purchase significant amounts of bronze ingot, brass rod, cast iron, steel and plastic, which are utilized in manufacturing our many product lines. Our operating results can be adversely affected by changes in commodity prices if we are unable to pass on related price increases to our customers. We manage this risk by monitoring related market prices, working with our suppliers to achieve the maximum level of stability in their costs and related pricing, seeking alternative supply sources when necessary and passing increases in commodity costs to our customers, to the maximum extent possible, when they occur.

        During 2008, we entered into a series of copper swap contracts to fix the price per pound of copper for one customer which expired in 2009. These swaps are classified as economic hedges, as more fully explained in Note 16 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a $0.3 million gain and $1.6 million loss, respectively, associated with the copper swaps in other expense.

        We used a discounted cash flow model for determining the value of the ARS and the UBS rights. As there is no active market for the ARS and the rights are non-transferable, we believe that the discounted cash flow model gives the best estimate of fair value at December 31, 2009 and 2008. The model includes assumptions that are more fully explained in Note 16 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The most sensitive of these assumptions is the illiquidity spread. We engaged valuation experts to develop the models. The illiquidity spread increases the discount rate, thereby decreasing the estimated fair value. To value the rights issued by UBS, we used a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value based on the assumption we will exercise our option at the earliest convenience. While we believe the assumptions used are consistent with the current market view on the ARS and are reasonable, different assumptions could significantly affect our valuation of ARS.

Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The documents listed on the index to financial statements on page 55listed in section (a) (1) of "Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules" of this Reportannual report are incorporated herein by reference.



Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures. The effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures is also necessarily limited by the staff and other resources available to us and the geographic diversity of our operations. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sCommission's rules and forms and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2006,2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. In connection with these rules, we will continue to review and document our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.


50




Management’sManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

    (i)
    pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;



    (ii)
    provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and



    (iii)
    provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’sCompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.2009.

The audited consolidated financial statements of the Company include the results of Black Teknigas, Limited, which the Company acquired on August 14, 2006, Kim Olofsson Safe Corporation AB, which the Company acquired on June 7, 2006, the assets and business of Calflex Manufacturing, Inc., and Ningbo Best Metal & Plastic Manufacturing, Ltd, which the Company acquired on June 2, 2006, ATS Expansion Group, which the Company acquired on May 19, 2006, and the assets and business of Changsha Valve Works, which the Company acquired on April 26, 2006, but management’s assessment does not include an assessment of the internal control over financial reporting of these entities.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company's consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K has audited management’s assessment ofissued an attestation report on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting and issued an attestation report.reporting. That report appears immediately following this report.


51




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Watts Water Technologies, Inc. maintained effective's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO). Watts Water Technologies, Inc.’s's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, included in the accompanyingManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of Watts Water Technologies, Inc.’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control andbased on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Watts Water Technologies, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our opinion, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. acquired ATS Expansion Group; Black Teknigas Limited; Kim Olofsson Safe Corporation AB; Calflex Manufacturing, Inc.; Ningbo Best Metal and Plastic Manufacturing, Ltd.; and Changsha Valve Works during 2006 (collectively the 2006 acquisitions). Management excluded from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, the 2006 acquisitions representing consolidated total assets of $164 million and consolidated revenues of $58 million


included in the consolidated financial statements of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the 2006 acquisitions.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule,2009, and our report dated March 1, 20072010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and included explanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)”.statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 1, 20072010

Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.

        None.


None.

53




PART III

Item 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEGOVERNANCE.
.

Information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Report under the caption “Executive"Executive Officers and Directors”Directors" and is incorporated herein by reference. The information provided under the captions “Information"Information as to Nominees for Director,” “Corporate" "Corporate Governance,” “Legal Proceeding Involving Director,”" and “Section"Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”Compliance" in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200712, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all officers, employees and Board members. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted in the Investor Relations section of our website,www.wattswater.com. We will provide you with a print copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics free of charge on written request to Lester J. Taufen,Kenneth R. Lepage, Secretary, Watts Water Technologies, Inc., 815 Chestnut Street, North Andover, MA 01845. Any amendments to, or waivers of, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which appliesapply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, corporate controller or any person performing similar functions will be disclosed on our website promptly following the date of such amendment or waiver.

Item 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONCOMPENSATION.
.

The information provided under the captions “Director"Director Compensation,” “Corporate" "Corporate Governance,” “Compensation" "Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive" "Executive Compensation,” “Compensation" "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and “Compensation"Compensation Committee Report”Report" in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200712, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

The “Compensation"Compensation Committee Report”Report" contained in our Proxy Statement shall not be deemed “soliciting material”"soliciting material" or “filed”"filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate such information by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Item 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSMATTERS..

The information providedappearing under the captions “Principal Stockholders” and “Shares Available for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans”caption "Principal Stockholders" in our definitivethe Registrant's Proxy Statement for our 2007relating to the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200712, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009, about the shares of Class A Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options issued under the Company's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 1991 Directors' Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option Plan and 2003 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the settlement of restricted stock units granted



under our Management Stock Purchase Plan as well as the number of shares remaining for future issuance under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and Management Stock Purchase Plan.

 
 Equity Compensation Plan Information 
Plan Category
 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
 Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plan (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  1,650,199(1)$24.53  2,428,706(2)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  None  None  None 

Total

  1,650,199(1)$24.53  2,428,706(2)

(1)
Represents 1,299,733 outstanding options under the 1991 Directors' Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 2003 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, and 350,466 outstanding restricted stock units under the Management Stock Purchase Plan.

(2)
Includes 1,604,860 shares available for future issuance under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, and 823,846 shares available for future issuance under the Management Stock Purchase Plan.

Item 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCEINDEPENDENCE..

The information provided under the captions “Corporate Governance”"Corporate Governance" and “Policies"Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions”Transactions" in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200712, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICESSERVICES..

The information provided under the caption “Ratification"Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”Firm" in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20072010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 200712, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.


54




PART IV

Item 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESSCHEDULES..

(a)(1)Financial Statements

The following financial statements are included in a separate section of this Report commencing on the page numbers specified below:

(a)(2)Schedules

        

All other required schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a)(3)Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


55




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.




By:


By:


/s/S/ PATRICK S. O’KEEFEO'KEEFE



Patrick S. O’Keefe

O'Keefe

Chief Executive Officer
President and Director


DATED: March 1, 2007

2010





        

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date







/s/S/ PATRICK S. O’KEEFEO'KEEFE


Patrick S. O'Keefe

Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

March 1, 2007

2010

Patrick S. O’Keefe

/s/S/ WILLIAM C. MCCARTNEY


William C. McCartney

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

March 1, 20072010

William C. McCartney/S/ ROBERT L. AYERS


Robert L. Ayers

Director

February 26, 2010

/S/ KENNETT F. BURNES


Kennett F. Burnes

Director

February 26, 2010

/s/S/ RICHARD J. CATHCART


Richard J. Cathcart

Director

February 26, 2010

/S/ TIMOTHY P. HORNE


Timothy P. Horne

Director

Director

March 1, 2007February 26, 2010

Timothy P. Horne

/s/  ROBERT L. AYERS

Director

March 1, 2007

Robert L. Ayers

/s/S/ RALPH E. JACKSON, JR.

Director

March 1, 2007



Ralph E. Jackson, Jr.

Director

February 26, 2010


Signature
Title
Date





/S/ KENNETH J. MCAVOY


Kenneth J. McAvoy

Director

February 26, 2010

/S/ JOHN K. MCGILLICUDDY


John K. McGillicuddy

Director

February 26, 2010

/s/  KENNETH J. MCAVOY

Director

March 1, 2007

Kenneth J. McAvoy

/s/  JOHN K. MCGILLICUDDY

Director

March 1, 2007

John K. McGillicuddy

/s/S/ GORDON W. MORAN


Gordon W. Moran

Chairman of the Board

March 1, 2007February 26, 2010

Gordon W. Moran

/s/S/ DANIEL J. MURPHY, III

Director

March 1, 2007



Daniel J. Murphy, III

Director

February 26, 2010


56




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.2009. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have also audited the financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” effective January 1, 2006, utilizing the modified prospective application transition method.

Also, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” effective December 31, 2006.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Watts Water Technologies, Inc.’s's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 1, 2007,2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessmentthe effectiveness of and the effective operation of,Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 1, 20072010


57




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except per share information)

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net sales

 

$

1,230,777

 

$

924,346

 

$

824,558

 

Cost of goods sold

 

805,759

 

599,644

 

533,997

 

GROSS PROFIT

 

425,018

 

324,702

 

290,561

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

300,179

 

229,418

 

206,866

 

Restructuring and other (income) charges

 

(5,648

)

729

 

95

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

130,487

 

94,555

 

83,600

 

Other (income) expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

(5,014

)

(1,232

)

(1,135

)

Interest expense

 

22,148

 

10,353

 

10,564

 

Minority interest

 

(1,828

)

350

 

1,203

 

Other

 

(928

)

(727

)

296

 

 

 

14,378

 

8,744

 

10,928

 

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

116,109

 

85,811

 

72,672

 

Provision for income taxes

 

39,016

 

30,791

 

23,934

 

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

77,093

 

55,020

 

48,738

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes of $2,101 in 2006, $258 in 2005 and $1,156 in 2004

 

(3,357

)

(421

)

(1,918

)

NET INCOME

 

$

73,736

 

$

54,599

 

$

46,820

 

Basic EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

2.32

 

$

1.69

 

$

1.51

 

Discontinued operations

 

(0.10

)

(0.01

)

(0.06

)

NET INCOME

 

$

2.21

 

$

1.68

 

$

1.45

 

Weighted average number of shares

 

33,295

 

32,489

 

32,276

 

Diluted EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

2.29

 

$

1.67

 

$

1.49

 

Discontinued operations

 

(0.10

)

(0.01

)

(0.06

)

NET INCOME

 

$

2.19

 

$

1.66

 

$

1.43

 

Weighted average number of shares

 

33,671

 

33,002

 

32,719

 

Dividends per share

 

$

0.36

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.28

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 

Net sales

 $1,225.9 $1,431.4 $1,356.3 

Cost of goods sold

  790.8  949.6  902.1 
        
 

GROSS PROFIT

  435.1  481.8  454.2 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  323.5  355.6  327.0 

Restructuring and other charges

  16.1  5.6  3.2 

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charges

  3.3  22.0   
        
 

OPERATING INCOME

  92.2  98.6  124.0 
        

Other (income) expense:

          
 

Interest income

  (0.9) (5.1) (14.5)
 

Interest expense

  22.0  26.2  27.1 
 

Other

  (1.2) 9.5  2.3 
        

Total other expense

  19.9  30.6  14.9 
        

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

  72.3  68.0  109.1 

Provision for income taxes

  31.3  24.7  36.2 
        

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

  41.0  43.3  72.9 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (23.6) 1.4  1.7 
        

NET INCOME BEFORE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

  17.4  44.7  74.6 

Plus: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

    1.9  2.8 
        

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

 $17.4 $46.6 $77.4 
        
 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 

 $41.0 $45.2 $75.7 
        

Basic EPS

          

Income (loss) per share attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

          
 

Continuing operations

 $1.11 $1.23 $1.96 
 

Discontinued operations

  (0.64) 0.04  0.04 
        
 

NET INCOME

 $0.47 $1.27 $2.00 
        

Weighted average number of shares

  37.0  36.6  38.6 
        

Diluted EPS

          

Income (loss) per share attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc.:

          
 

Continuing operations

 $1.10 $1.23 $1.94 
 

Discontinued operations

  (0.63) 0.04  0.04 
        
 

NET INCOME

 $0.47 $1.26 $1.99 
        

Weighted average number of shares

  37.1  36.8  39.0 
        

Dividends per share

 $0.44 $0.44 $0.40 
        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


58




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except share information)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

342,979

 

$

45,758

 

Investment securities

 

11,825

 

 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $10,543 in 2006 and $9,296 in 2005

 

228,502

 

177,364

 

Inventories, net

 

316,416

 

242,837

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

15,842

 

25,361

 

Deferred income taxes

 

26,739

 

27,540

 

Assets of discontinued operations

 

10,079

 

9,555

 

Total Current Assets

 

952,382

 

528,415

 

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

 

206,160

 

164,999

 

OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

356,090

 

296,636

 

Other, net

 

146,218

 

110,920

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

1,660,850

 

$

1,100,970

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

120,954

 

$

91,053

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

100,437

 

67,071

 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 

42,593

 

28,496

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

7,522

 

13,635

 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

27,852

 

23,068

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

299,358

 

223,323

 

LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT PORTION

 

441,697

 

293,350

 

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

 

34,585

 

24,803

 

OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

 

52,686

 

32,187

 

MINORITY INTEREST

 

5,971

 

7,831

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock, $.10 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding

 

 

 

Class A Common Stock, $.10 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; 1 vote per share; issued and outstanding, 31,239,111 shares in 2006 and 25,205,210 shares in 2005

 

3,124

 

2,521

 

Class B Common Stock, $.10 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 10 votes per share; issued and outstanding, 7,293,880 shares in 2006 and 7,343,880 in 2005

 

729

 

734

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

367,795

 

142,694

 

Retained earnings

 

429,555

 

368,264

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

25,350

 

5,263

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

826,553

 

519,476

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

1,660,850

 

$

1,100,970

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 

ASSETS

       

CURRENT ASSETS:

       
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $258.2 $165.6 
 

Short-term investment securities

  6.5   
 

Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7.5 million in 2009 and $9.6 million in 2008

  181.3  215.4 
 

Inventories, net

  266.7  333.7 
 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  22.1  14.0 
 

Deferred income taxes

  35.4  40.1 
 

Assets held for sale

  11.3   
 

Assets of discontinued operations

  15.3  23.9 
      
  

Total Current Assets

  796.8  792.7 

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

  206.5  231.0 

OTHER ASSETS:

       
 

Goodwill

  425.1  417.5 
 

Long-term investment securities

    8.3 
 

Intangible assets, net

  151.2  166.0 
 

Deferred income taxes

  3.0  6.9 
 

Other, net

  8.8  8.9 
 

Other noncurrent assets of discontinued operations

    28.8 
      

TOTAL ASSETS

 $1,591.4 $1,660.1 
      

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

       

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

       
 

Accounts payable

 $102.3 $112.5 
 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  105.9  101.4 
 

Accrued compensation and benefits

  45.9  41.3 
 

Current portion of long-term debt

  50.9  4.5 
 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

  2.0�� 35.2 
      
  

Total Current Liabilities

  307.0  294.9 

LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT PORTION

  304.0  409.8 

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

  43.0  40.3 

OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

  57.8  70.6 

OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

    2.1 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

       
 

Preferred Stock, $0.10 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding

     
 

Class A Common Stock, $0.10 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; 1 vote per share; issued and outstanding, 29,506,523 shares in 2009 and 29,250,175 shares in 2008

  3.0  2.9 
 

Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 10 votes per share; issued and outstanding, 7,193,880 shares in 2009 and 7,293,880 shares at 2008

  0.7  0.7 
 

Additional paid-in capital

  393.7  386.9 
 

Retained earnings

  452.1  451.7 
 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  30.1  0.2 
      
  

Total Stockholders' Equity

  879.6  842.4 
      

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 $1,591.4 $1,660.1 
      

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


59




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Amounts in thousands,millions, except share information)

 

 

Class A
Common Stock

 

Class B
Common Stock

 

Additional
Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

 

Total
Stockholders’

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

Equity

 

Balance at December 31, 2003

 

24,459,121

 

 

$

2,446

 

 

7,605,224

 

 

$

761

 

 

 

$

132,983

 

 

 

$

286,396

 

 

 

$

13,805

 

 

 

$

436,391

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,820

 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,833

 

 

 

12,833

 

 

Pension plan additional minimum liability, net of tax of ($54)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(20

)

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59,633

 

 

Shares of Class B Common Stock converted to Class A Common Stock

 

261,344

 

 

27

 

 

(261,344

)

 

(27

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

 

258,247

 

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,794

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,819

 

 

Tax benefit for stock options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

969

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

969

 

 

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

 

32,133

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of deferred compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

157

 

 

Net change in restricted stock units

 

38,493

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

886

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

890

 

 

Common Stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,071

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,071

)

 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 

25,049,338

 

 

$

2,505

 

 

7,343,880

 

 

$

734

 

 

 

$

138,786

 

 

 

$

324,145

 

 

 

$

26,618

 

 

 

$

492,788

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54,599

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54,599

 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,377

)

 

 

(19,377

)

 

Pension plan additional minimum liability, net of tax of ($1,203)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,978

)

 

 

(1,978

)

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,244

 

 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

 

107,823

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,507

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,518

 

 

Tax benefit for stock options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

875

 

 

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

 

5,616

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of deferred compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

289

 

 

Net change in restricted stock units

 

42,433

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,242

 

 

Common Stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,480

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,480

)

 

Balance at December 31, 2005

 

25,205,210

 

 

$

2,521

 

 

7,343,880

 

 

$

734

 

 

 

$

142,694

 

 

 

$

368,264

 

 

 

$

5,263

 

 

 

$

519,476

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,736

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,736

 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment and other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,006

 

 

 

25,006

 

 

Pension plan additional liability, net of tax of $569

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

908

 

 

 

908

 

 

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,650

 

 

Initial impact upon adoption of FAS 158, net of tax of ($3,752)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,827

)

 

 

(5,827

)

 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

 

106,499

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,837

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,847

 

 

Tax benefit for stock options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,432

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,985

 

 

Shares of Class B Common Stock converted to Class A Common Stock

 

50,000

 

 

5

 

 

(50,000

)

 

(5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

 

59,008

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in restricted stock units

 

68,394

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

824

 

 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued in Stock Offering, net of offering costs of $11,389

 

5,750,000

 

 

575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

218,611

 

 

Common Stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12,445

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12,445

)

 

Balance at December 31, 2006

 

31,239,111

 

 

$

3,124

 

 

7,293,880

 

 

$

729

 

 

 

$

367,795

 

 

 

$

429,555

 

 

 

$

25,350

 

 

 

$

826,553

 

 

 
 Class A
Common Stock
 Class B
Common Stock
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
 
 
 Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 
 
 Shares Amount Shares Amount 

Balance at December 31, 2006

  31,239,111 $3.1  7,293,880 $0.7 $367.8 $429.6 $25.4 $826.6 
 

Comprehensive income:

                         
  

Net income

                 77.4     77.4 
  

Cumulative translation adjustment

                    39.1  39.1 
  

Pension plan gain arising during the year, net of tax of $3.0 million

                    4.2  4.2 
                         
  

Comprehensive income

                       120.7 
                         
 

Impact upon adoption of new GAAP

                 (0.8)    (0.8)
 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

  66,658           1.1        1.1 
 

Tax benefit for stock options exercised

              1.0        1.0 
 

Stock-based compensation

              6.0        6.0 
 

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

  58,726                     
 

Net change in restricted stock units

  109,977           1.7        1.7 
 

Repurchase and retirement of Class A Common Stock

  (874,416)             (25.2)    (25.2)
 

Common Stock dividends

                 (15.6)    (15.6)
                  
  

Balance at December 31, 2007

  30,600,056 $3.1  7,293,880 $0.7 $377.6 $465.4 $68.7 $915.5 
 

Comprehensive income:

                         
  

Net income

                 46.6     46.6 
  

Cumulative translation adjustment

                    (51.8) (51.8)
  

Pension plan loss arising during the year, net of tax of $9.7 million

                    (16.7) (16.7)
                         
  

Comprehensive loss

                       (21.9)
                         
 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

  85,512           1.6        1.6 
 

Stock-based compensation

              5.3        5.3 
 

Issuance of shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

  73,542                      
 

Net change in restricted stock units

  109,689           2.4        2.4 
 

Repurchase and retirement of Class A Common Stock

  (1,618,624) (0.2)          (44.1)    (44.3)
 

Common Stock dividends

                 (16.2)    (16.2)
                  

Balance at December 31, 2008

  29,250,175 $2.9  7,293,880 $0.7 $386.9 $451.7 $0.2 $842.4 
 

Comprehensive income:

                         
  

Net income

                 17.4     17.4 
  

Cumulative translation adjustment

                    26.2  26.2 
  

Pension plan gain arising during the year, net of tax of $1.4 million

                    3.7  3.7 
                         
  

Comprehensive income

                       47.3 
                         
 

Shares of Class B Common Stock converted to Class A Common Stock

  100,000     (100,000)               
 

Shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon the exercise of stock options

  30,194  0.1        0.4        0.5 
 

Stock-based compensation

              4.9        4.9 
 

Issuance of net shares of restricted Class A Common Stock

  58,454                      
 

Net change in restricted stock units

  67,700           1.5        1.5 
 

Repurchase and retirement of Class A Common Stock

                 (0.8)    (0.8)
 

Common Stock dividends

                 (16.2)    (16.2)
                  
 

Balance at December 31, 2009

  29,506,523 $3.0  7,193,880 $0.7 $393.7 $452.1 $30.1 $879.6 
                  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


60




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Amounts in thousands)millions)

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

77,093

 

$

55,020

 

$

48,738

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

26,656

 

23,542

 

26,290

 

Amortization

 

8,635

 

2,576

 

1,761

 

(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and other

 

(8,267

)

572

 

707

 

Stock-based compensation

 

2,985

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes (benefit)

 

(2,081

)

(1,279

)

(5,735

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(16,957

)

(16,546

)

(5,745

)

Inventories

 

(37,293

)

(20,330

)

(36,177

)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

1,936

 

(4,098

)

1,394

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

29,524

 

12,410

 

8,977

 

Net cash provided by continuing operations

 

82,231

 

51,867

 

40,210

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(44,648

)

(18,590

)

(20,999

)

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

 

31,867

 

652

 

2,143

 

Investments in securities

 

(11,825

)

 

(25,000

)

Proceeds from sale of securities

 

 

26,600

 

2,400

 

Increase in other assets

 

(1,187

)

(469

)

(1,470

)

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(93,420

)

(191,396

)

(68,453

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(119,213

)

(183,203

)

(111,379

)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term debt

 

356,568

 

161,476

 

92,480

 

Payments of long-term debt

 

(228,314

)

(41,995

)

(104,693

)

Payment of capital lease

 

(4,055

)

 

 

Shares transactions under employee stock plans

 

2,671

 

3,048

 

4,868

 

Tax benefit of stock options exercised

 

1,432

 

875

 

969

 

Debt issue costs

 

(2,377

)

 

(1,079

)

Proceeds from stock offering, net

 

218,611

 

 

 

Dividends

 

(12,445

)

(10,480

)

(9,071

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

332,091

 

112,924

 

(16,526

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

1,209

 

(693

)

2,054

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations

 

903

 

(1,050

)

6,553

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

297,221

 

(20,155

)

(79,088

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

45,758

 

65,913

 

145,001

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

 

$

342,979

 

$

45,758

 

$

65,913

 

NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition of businesses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of assets acquired

 

$

161,535

 

$

230,587

 

$

80,126

 

Cash paid, net of cash acquired

 

93,420

 

191,396

 

68,453

 

Liabilities assumed

 

$

68,115

 

$

39,191

 

$

11,673

 

Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment under capital lease

 

$

15,957

 

$

 

$

 

Retirement of variable rate demand bonds with cash collateral

 

$

(8,900

)

$

8,900

 

$

 

CASH PAID FOR:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

21,678

 

$

9,529

 

$

9,815

 

Taxes

 

$

35,332

 

$

30,698

 

$

33,000

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

          
 

Net income attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 

 $17.4 $46.6 $77.4 
 

Less: Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (23.6) 1.4  1.7 
        
 

Net income from continuing operations attributable to Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 

  41.0  45.2  75.7 
 

Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operating activities:

          
   

Depreciation

  33.7  31.5  28.1 
   

Amortization

  13.1  12.2  9.2 
   

Loss on disposal and impairment of goodwill, property, plant and equipment and other

  12.1  24.0  2.0 
   

Stock-based compensation

  4.9  5.3  6.0 
   

Deferred income tax (benefit)

  9.4  (18.7) (8.2)
   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestures:

          
    

Accounts receivable

  38.3  20.9  7.1 
    

Inventories

  71.5  15.1  (7.4)
    

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (7.6) 8.3  (1.3)
    

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  (11.8) 1.2  (21.2)
        
  

Net cash provided by continuing operations

  204.6  145.0  90.0 
        

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

          
 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

  (24.2) (26.2) (36.9)
 

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

  0.8  1.1  0.6 
 

Investments in securities

    (2.7) (27.5)
 

Proceeds from sale of securities

  1.7  33.3  0.4 
 

Other, net

  0.7     
 

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  (0.3) (175.5) (21.3)
        
  

Net cash used in investing activities

  (21.3) (170.0) (84.7)
        

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

          
 

Proceeds from long-term debt

  1.7  22.9  43.8 
 

Payments of long-term debt

  (61.5) (54.9) (71.5)
 

Payment of capital leases

  (1.3) (1.3) (1.7)
 

Proceeds from share transactions under employee stock plans

  0.4  1.6  1.1 
 

Tax benefit of stock awards exercised

  (0.3)   1.0 
 

Payments to repurchase common stock

    (44.5) (23.6)
 

Dividends

  (16.2) (16.2) (15.6)
        
  

Net cash used in financing activities

  (77.2) (92.4) (66.5)
        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  8.0  (5.9) 9.4 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations

  (21.2) 0.8  1.8 

Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations

  (0.3) (2.2) (2.7)
        

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  92.6  (124.7) (52.7)
        

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  165.6  290.3  343.0 
        

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

 $258.2 $165.6 $290.3 
        

NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

          

Acquisition of businesses:

          

Fair value of assets acquired

 $ $231.5 $23.7 

Cash paid, net of cash acquired

    176.8  22.7 
        

Liabilities assumed

 $ $54.7 $1.0 
        

Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment under capital lease

 $ $ $1.4 
        

Issuance of stock under management stock purchase plan

 $1.5 $1.6 $1.7 
        

Liability for shares repurchased

 $ $ $1.4 
        

CASH PAID FOR:

          
 

Interest

 $22.0 $26.9 $27.1 
        
 

Taxes

 $36.6 $45.1 $48.0 
        

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


61





Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Description of Business

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (the Company) designs, manufactures and sells an extensive line of water safety and flow control products primarily for the water quality, water conservation, water safety and water flow control and water conservation markets located predominantly in North America, Europe, and China.

(2) Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority and wholly owned subsidiaries. Upon consolidation, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investmentsinstruments with remaining maturities of three months or less at the date of original issuance.purchase and consist primarily of money market funds, for which the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment Securities

Investment securities at December 31, 20062009 and 2008 consisted of auction rate certificatessecurities (ARS) whose underlying investments were in AAA rated municipal bonds.bonds and student loans and investments in rights issued by UBS, AG (UBS). The certificates are bought and sold at auction with reset dates of up to 35 days. The certificates are tradedsecurities were purchased at par value, which approximates market value at December 31, 2006.value. The rights issued by UBS were received in connection with a settlement agreement. See Note 16 for additional information regarding the rights issued by UBS. The Company classifiesclassified its debt securities and investment in rights from UBS as available for sale.trading securities.

Available-for-sale        Trading securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses, netThe Company determines the fair value by obtaining market value when available from quoted prices in active markets. In the absence of quoted prices, the Company uses other inputs to determine the fair value of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reportedinvestments. All changes in the fair value as a separate component of other comprehensive income until realized. Realizedwell as any realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-salethe securities are determined on a specific-identification basis.

A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidencerecorded when incurred to the contrary. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and durationconsolidated statements of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year-end, and forecasted performance of the investee.operations as other income or expense.

Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related available-for-sale security as an adjustment to yield using the effective-interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Allowance for doubtful accounts includes reserves for bad debts and sales returns and allowances. The Company analyzes the aging of accounts receivable, individual accounts receivable, historical bad debts, concentration of receivables by customer, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms. The Company specifically analyzes individual accounts receivable and


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

establishes specific reserves against financially troubled customers. In addition, factors are developed in certain regions utilizing historical trends of sales and returns and allowances to derive a reserve for returns and allowances.

Concentration of Credit

The Company sells products to a diversified customer base and, therefore, has no significant concentrations of credit risk, except that approximatelyrisk. In 2009 and 2008, no one customer accounted for 10.0%, 10.7% and 10.3% or more of the Company’sCompany's total sales in 2006, 2005sales.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and 2004, respectively, wereSubsidiaries

Notes to one company. These sales were transacted within the North America geographic segment.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Inventories(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (primarily(using primarily the first-in, first-out method) or market. Market value is determined by replacement cost or net realizable value. Historical experience is used as the basis for determining the reserve for excess or obsolete inventories.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid for acquisitions exceeds the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but rather are tested annually for impairment. The test was performed as of October 29, 2006.25, 2009.

Assets held for sale

        The Company accounts for assets held for sale when management has committed to a plan to sell the asset or group of assets, is actively marketing the asset or group of assets, the asset or group of assets can be sold in its current condition in a reasonable period of time and the plan is not expected to change. As of December 31, 2009, the Company is actively marketing two properties and one group of assets worldwide and expects to complete the sale of these assets or group of assets in the next twelve months. The Company recorded estimated losses of $7.8 million to reduce these assets or group of assets down to their estimated fair value, less any costs to sell. This amount is recorded as a component of restructuring and other costs in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 4 for additional information associated with the Company's restructuring charges.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill        The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by geographic segment are as follows:

 
 North
America
 Europe China Discontinued
Operations
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Gross balance at January 1, 2008

 $211.0 $151.9 $6.1 $16.8 $385.8 

Accumulated impairment losses

           
            

Net goodwill at January 1, 2008

  211.0  151.9  6.1  16.8  385.8 

Goodwill acquired during the period

    89.5  3.3    92.8 

Adjustments to goodwill during the period

  0.4    (2.1) (0.5) (2.2)

Goodwill impairment charge

  (22.0)       (22.0)

Effect of change in exchange rates used for translation

  (1.1) (20.1) 0.6  (2.5) (23.1)
            

Net change in goodwill

  (22.7) 69.4  1.8  (3.0) 45.5 
            

Gross balance at December 31, 2008

 $210.3 $221.3 $7.9 $13.8 $453.3 

Accumulated impairment losses

  (22.0)       (22.0)
            

Net goodwill at December 31, 2008

 $188.3 $221.3 $7.9 $13.8 $431.3 

Adjustments to goodwill during the period, net

  (0.6)       (0.6)

Goodwill related to discontinued operations

        (14.5) (14.5)

Effect of change in exchange rates used for translation

  0.7  7.5    0.7  8.9 
            

Net change in goodwill

  0.1  7.5    (13.8) (6.2)
            

Gross balance at December 31, 2009

 $210.4 $228.8 $7.9 $ $447.1 

Accumulated impairment losses

  (22.0)       (22.0)
            

Net goodwill at December 31, 2009

 $188.4 $228.8 $7.9 $ $425.1 
            


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and intangibleSubsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In 2008, the Company completed an assessment of the fair value of the net assets with indefinite lives are tested annually forof its water quality business unit, which includes a number of businesses that were purchased over time, and recorded a pre-tax goodwill impairment in accordance withcharge of $22.0 million due to sales declining from prior year levels and from the provisionsCompany's expectations of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142 “Goodwilllower commercial and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142).residential project activity. The Company’s impairment review is based on a discounted cash flow approach atCompany estimated the fair value of the reporting unit levelusing the expected present value of future cash flows.

        In February 2009, the Company reached a settlement with the seller regarding a purchase price adjustment to the Core Industries, Inc. acquisition that requires management judgmentresulted in the Company receiving $1.1 million. In May 2009, the Company deconsolidated TEAM Precision Pipework, Ltd. (TEAM). As a result of the deconsolidation, the Company reduced goodwill by $8.4 million associated with respectTEAM. See Note 3 for additional information relating to revenue and expense growth rates, changesthe deconsolidation of TEAM. In September 2009, the Company's Board of Directors approved a plan to dispose of its investment in working capital andWatts Valve (Changsha) Co., Ltd. (CWV), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate.Company located in China. The Company uses its judgmentclassified the net assets of CWV as a discontinued operation and recorded a decrease in assessing whetherthe net assets may have becometo their estimated fair value less costs to sell. As a result, the Company reduced goodwill by $6.1 million associated with CWV. See Note 3 and Note 5 for additional information relating to CWV.

        Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that it is "more likely than not" that goodwill might be impaired, between annual impairment tests. Indicators such as unexpected adversea change in business conditions, economic factors, unanticipated technological change or competitive activities, lossconditions. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of key personnel and acts by governments and courts, may signal that an asset has become impaired.each year.

Intangible assets with estimable lives and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (FAS 144).recoverable. Recoverability of intangible assets with estimable lives and other long-lived assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to future net undiscounted pretax cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If these comparisons indicate that an asset is not recoverable, the impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the related estimated fair value. Estimated fair value is based on either discounted future pretax operating cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset. The Company determines the discount rate for this analysis based on the expected internal rate of return for the related business and


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

does not allocate interest charges to the asset or asset group being measured. Judgment is required to estimate discounted future operating cash flows.

        In connection with the restructuring plan announced in February 2009, the Company will be closing several facilities to reduce the overall size of its manufacturing footprint. The changes inCompany concluded that it is more likely than not that the carrying amount of goodwillcertain assets held and used may not be recoverable. Specifically, the Company identified a long-lived asset group primarily comprised of buildings and land use rights in China. The Company used an undiscounted future cash flow model to test the long-lived asset group based on the primary asset identified, the current economic outlook and the estimated fair value from the ultimate disposition of the asset group. The inputs used in this analysis are as follows:

 

 

North
America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Carrying amount at December 31, 2004

 

$

123,539

 

$

98,117

 

$

4,522

 

$

226,178

 

Goodwill acquired during the period

 

69,712

 

12,295

 

 

82,007

 

Adjustments to goodwill during the period

 

252

 

(188

)

939

 

1,003

 

Effect of change in exchange rates used for translation

 

94

 

(12,786

)

140

 

(12,552

)

Carrying amount at December 31, 2005

 

193,597

 

97,438

 

5,601

 

296,636

 

Goodwill acquired during the period

 

 

37,161

 

3,447

 

40,608

 

Adjustments to goodwill during the period

 

5,264

 

 

 

5,264

 

Effect of change in exchange rates used for translation

 

2

 

13,304

 

276

 

13,582

 

Carrying amount at December 31, 2006

 

$

198,863

 

$

147,903

 

$

9,324

 

$

356,090

 

The adjustments to North American goodwillunobservable inputs (level 3). Based on the analysis performed, the Company recorded a $5.5 million impairment charge for one asset group in China during the yearquarter ended December 31, 2006 relateSeptember 27, 2009. This charge is reported in restructuring and other charges in the consolidated statements of operations.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to an accrualConsolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In connection with the plan to dispose of approximately $4,000,000CWV, certain long-lived assets were reduced by $3.9 million to reflect their estimated fair value less cost to sell. This charge was recorded in earn-out provisions and the finalizationdiscontinued operations as part of the Dormont Manufacturing Company and Core Industries, Inc. purchase price allocations. Dormont Manufacturing Company and Core Industries, Inc. were acquired in December 2005.$8.5 million loss on disposal.

Other intangible        Intangible assets include the following and are presented in “Other Assets: Other, net”, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Gross
Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Patents

 

$

13,179

 

 

$

(5,301

)

 

$

9,264

 

 

$

(4,669

)

 

Customer relationships

 

65,304

 

 

(7,478

)

 

49,795

 

 

(1,988

)

 

Technology

 

7,513

 

 

(1,210

)

 

3,673

 

 

(330

)

 

Other

 

15,321

 

 

(4,015

)

 

5,398

 

 

(2,382

)

 

Total amortizable intangible assets

 

101,317

 

 

(18,004

)

 

68,130

 

 

(9,369

)

 

Intangible assets not subject to amortization

 

50,519

 

 

 

 

40,582

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

151,836

 

 

$

(18,004

)

 

$

108,712

 

 

$

(9,369

)

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 

Patents

 $17.3 $(8.5)$17.4 $(7.3)

Customer relationships

  103.6  (31.5) 101.1  (20.7)

Technology

  15.0  (4.2) 7.5  (3.3)

Other

  13.9  (5.6) 14.6  (5.3)
          
 

Total amortizable intangibles

  149.8  (49.8) 140.6  (36.6)
          

Intangible assets not subject to amortization

  51.2    62.0   
          
 

Total

 $201.0 $(49.8)$202.6 $(36.6)
          

        

Aggregate amortization expense for amortized other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007 was $8,635,000, $2,576,000$13.1 million, $12.2 million and $1,761,000,$9.2 million, respectively. Additionally, future amortization expense on amortizable intangible assets approximates $10,056,000 for 2007, $8,582,000 for 2008, $8,294,000 for 2009, $8,287,000is expected to be $13.1 million for 2010, $12.7 million for 2011, $10.3 million for 2012, $9.9 million for 2013, and $7,861,000$9.7 million for 2011.2014. Amortization expense is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. The weighted-average remaining life of total amortizable intangible assets is 11.510.2 years. Patents, customer relationships, technology and other amortizable intangibles have weighted-average remaining lives of 10.7


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

8.2 years, 10.29.2 years, 7.215.2 years and 21.514.1 years, respectively. Intangible assets not subject to amortization primarily include trademarks.

        Adjustments to indefinite lived intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2009 relate primarily to a reclassification of one technology related intangible asset and the results from the annual impairment analysis evaluation performed as of October 25, 2009. The Company had previously classified a technology intangible asset as an indefinite lived intangible asset as it could not determine the time horizon over which that asset was expected to be used. During 2009, the Company concluded that this technology asset no longer has an indefinite life due in part to recent competition and changes in regulations. As a result, the Company increased technology amortizable intangible assets and reduced intangible assets not subject to amortization by approximately $7.5 million. The Company uses a royalty relief method to evaluate the current fair value of its trademarks and unpatented technology. Due to the decreases in sales experienced in several of its brands and technology in 2009 as well as the estimated outlook for future sales of these brands and technology, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $3.3 million to decrease these assets to their estimated fair value.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

Taxes, Other than Income Taxes

        Taxes assessed by governmental authorities on sale transactions are recorded on a net basis and excluded from sales, in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

        The Company accounts for tax benefits when the item in question meets the more-likely-than-not (greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities) threshold. During 2009, the Company reduced its unrecognized tax benefits by approximately $0.6 million as a result of finalizing the federal tax audit and by $0.4 million resulting from voluntary disclosure agreements. The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that a portion of the currently remaining unrecognized tax benefit may be recognized by the end of 2011 as a result of the conclusion of federal and foreign income tax audits. The amount of expense accrued for penalties and interest is $0.5 million worldwide.

        As of December 31, 2009, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $2.8 million of which, approximately $2.5 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The difference between the amount of unrecognized tax benefits and the amount that would impact the effective tax rate consists of the federal tax benefit of state income tax items. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits and a separate analysis of accrued interest related to the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 
 (in millions) 

Balance at January 1, 2009

 $2.3 

Increases related to prior year tax positions

  1.6 

Decreases related to prior year tax positions

  (0.4)

Decreases related to statute expirations

  (0.1)

Settlements

  (0.6)
    

Balance at December 31, 2009

 $2.8 
    

        The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2008 and 2007 tax years. The expected completion date for these audits is March 2011. The Company does not anticipate any significant adjustments at this time. Watts conducts business in a variety of locations throughout the world resulting in tax filings in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is subject to tax examinations regularly as part of the normal course of business. The Company's major jurisdictions are the U.S., Canada, China, Netherlands, U.K., Germany, Italy and France. With few exceptions the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2003.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

        The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.

        The statute of limitations in our major jurisdictions is open in the U.S. for the year 2006 and later; in Canada for 2005 and later; and in the Netherlands for 2005 and later.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside the United States generally are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Balance sheet accounts, including goodwill, of foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at weighted average exchange rates for each period. Net translation gains or losses are included in other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’stockholders' equity. The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments since it does not provide for such taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions of these subsidiaries are included in net earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006,        The Company records compensation expense in the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”(FAS 123R) utilizingfinancial statements for share-based awards based on the “modified prospective” method as described in FAS 123R. Under the “modified prospective” method,grant date fair value of those awards. Stock-based compensation costexpense includes an estimate for pre-vesting forfeitures and is recognized for all share-based payments granted afterover the effective date and for all unvestedrequisite service periods of the awards granted prior toon a straight-line basis, which is generally commensurate with the effective date. In accordance with FAS 123R, prior period amounts were not restated. FAS 123R also requires the excess taxvesting term. The benefits associated with these share-based payments to be classifiedtax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as a financing activities in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows, rather than as operating cash flows as required under previous regulations.flow.

        At December 31, 2006,2009, the Company had three stock-based compensation plans with total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock-based compensation arrangements of approximately $7,271,000$7.7 million and a total weighted average remaining term of 2.02.4 years. For 2006,2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized compensation costs related to stock-based programs of approximately $2,985,000$4.9 million, $5.3 million and $6.0 million respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company recorded approximately $360,000$0.6 million, $0.7 million and $0.7 million of tax benefitbenefits during 20062009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, for the compensation expense relating to its stock options. For 2006,2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded approximately $592,000$1.2 million, $1.1 million and $1.3 million respectively, of tax benefit for its other stock-based plans. For 2006,2009, 2008 and 2007, the recognition of total stock-based compensation expense impacted both basic net income per common share and diluted net income per common share by $0.06.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc.$0.08, $0.10 and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Prior to the effective date, the stock-based compensation plans were accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. Pro-forma information regarding the impact of total stock-based compensation on net income and income per share for prior periods is required by FAS 123R.$0.10, respectively.

Such pro-forma information, determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) under the fair value method to measure stock-based compensation as required under the disclosure provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123) as amended by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure” (FAS 148) during 2005 and 2004, is illustrated in the following tables:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net income, as reported

 

$

54,599

 

$

46,820

 

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense from the Management Stock Purchase Plan included in reported net income, net of tax

 

531

 

384

 

Deduct: Stock-based employee expense determined under the fair value method, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted stock units (Management Stock Purchase Plan)

 

(560

)

(381

)

Employee stock options

 

(1,144

)

(670

)

Pro forma net income

 

$

53,426

 

$

46,153

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic—as reported

 

$

1.68

 

$

1.45

 

Basic—pro forma

 

$

1.64

 

$

1.43

 

Diluted—as reported

 

$

1.66

 

$

1.43

 

Diluted—pro forma

 

$

1.62

 

$

1.42

 

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The calculation of diluted earningsincome per share assumes the conversion of all dilutive securities (see Note 13).



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

Net income attributable to Watt's Water Technologies, Inc. and number of shares used to compute net earningsincome per share, basic and assuming full dilution, are reconciled below:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

Net
Income

 

Shares

 

Per
Share
Amount

 

Net
Income

 

Shares

 

Per
Share
Amount

 

Net
Income

 

Shares

 

Per
Share
Amount

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands, except per share information)

 

Basic EPS

 

$

73,736

 

33,295

 

 

$

2.21

 

 

$

54,599

 

32,489

 

 

$

1.68

 

 

$

46,820

 

32,276

 

 

$

1.45

 

 

Dilutive securities principally common stock options

 

 

376

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

513

 

 

(0.02

)

 

 

443

 

 

(0.02

)

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

73,736

 

33,671

 

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

54,599

 

33,002

 

 

$

1.66

 

 

$

46,820

 

32,719

 

 

$

1.43

 

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 Net
Income
 Shares Per
Share
Amount
 Net
Income
 Shares Per
Share
Amount
 Net
Income
 Shares Per
Share
Amount
 
 
 (Amounts in millions, except per share information)
 

Basic EPS

 $17.4  37.0 $0.47 $46.6  36.6 $1.27 $77.4  38.6 $2.00 

Dilutive securities principally common stock options

    0.1      0.2  (0.01)   0.4  (0.01)
                    

Diluted EPS

 $17.4  37.1 $0.47 $46.6  36.8 $1.26 $77.4  39.0 $1.99 
                    

        The computation of diluted net income per share for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 excludes the effect of the potential exercise of options to purchase approximately 0.9 million, 1.0 million and 0.5 shares, respectively, because the exercise price of the option was greater than the average market price of the Class A Common Stock, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

        During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares and 0.9 million shares, respectively, of its Class A Common Stock.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company manages risks associated with commodity prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates through a variety of strategies, including the use of hedging transactions, executed in accordance with the Company’sCompany's policies. The Company’sCompany's hedging transactions include, but are not limited to, the use of various derivative financial and commodity instruments. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivative instruments unless there is an underlying exposure. Any change in value of the derivative instruments would be substantially offset by an opposite change in the value of the underlying hedged items. The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Using qualifying criteria defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 133, “Accounting for        Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (FAS 133), derivative instruments aremay be designated and accounted for as either a hedge of a recognized asset or liability (fair value hedge) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge). For a fair value hedge, both the effective and ineffective portions of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument, along with an adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item for fair value changes attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument that are highly effective are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss until the underlying hedged item is recognized in earnings.

If a fair value or cash flow hedge were to cease to qualify for hedge accounting or be terminated, it would continue to be carried on the balance sheet at fair value until settled, but hedge accounting would be discontinued prospectively. If a forecasted transaction werewas no longer probable of occurring, amounts previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income would be recognized immediately in earnings. On occasion, the Company may enter into a derivative instrument that does not qualify for which hedge accounting is not required because it is entered into to offset changes in the fair value of an underlying transaction which is required to be recognized in earnings (natural hedge). These instruments are reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.


Certain forecasted transactions,
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(2) Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Foreign currency derivatives include forward foreign exchange contracts primarily intercompany sales between the United Statesfor Canadian dollars. Metal derivatives included commodity swaps for copper. During 2009 and Canada, and assets are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company monitors its foreign currency exposures on an ongoing basis to maximize the overall effectiveness of its foreign currency hedge positions. During 2006 and 2005,2008, the Company used foreign currency forward contractsa copper swap as a means of hedging exposure to foreign


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
metal prices (see Note 16).

currency risks. The Company’s foreign currency forwards did not qualify as a cash flow hedge under the criteria of FAS 133.

Portions of the Company’sCompany's outstanding debt are exposed to interest rate risks. The Company monitors its interest rate exposures on an ongoing basis to maximize the overall effectiveness of its interest rates. During 2006 and 2005, the Company used an interest rate swap as a means of hedging exposure to interest rate risks (see Note 11). The Company’s interest rate swap did not qualify as a cash flow hedge under the criteria of FAS 133.

Shipping and Handling

Shipping and handling costs included in selling, general and administrative expense amounted to $37,257,000, $28,123,000$31.4 million, $39.4 million and $25,110,000$38.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.

Research and Development

Research and development costs included in selling, general, and administrative expense amounted to $12,650,000, $11,576,000$17.8 million, $17.5 million and $9,942,000$15.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: the Company has entered into a binding agreement, the product has been shipped and title passes, the sales price to the customer is fixed or is determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Provisions for estimated returns and allowances are made at the time of sale, and are recorded as a reduction of sales and included in the allowance for doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company records provisions for sales incentives (primarily volume rebates), as an adjustment to net sales, in accordance withat the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-14, “Accounting for Certain Sales Incentives” (EITF 00-14) and EITF Issue No 01-9, “Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Resellertime of the Vendor’s Products”.sale based on estimated purchase targets.

Basis of PresentationEstimates

Certain amounts for 2006 have been reclassified to permit comparison with the 2005 presentation.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

New Accounting Standards

In February 2007,October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement (FAS) No. 159, “The Fair Value Optionan accounting standard update to improve disclosures related to fair value measurements. This update will require new disclosures when significant transfers in and out of the various fair value levels occur. This update will require a reconciliation for Financial Assetsfair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) be prepared on a gross basis, separately presenting information about purchases, sales, issuance and Financial Liabilities—including an Amendment to FAS No. 115,” (FAS 159) which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. FAS 159 issettlements. In addition, this update will amend current disclosure requirements for postretirement benefit plan assets. This update will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal yearsinterim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB 108), which provides interpretive guidance on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company adopted the provisions of SAB 108 for fiscal year 2006 and the impact of SAB 108 was not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” (FAS 158) which requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status; (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year; and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes will be reported in other comprehensive income. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 20062009, except for companies with publicly traded equity securities. The requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008, although earlier adoption is permitted. As a result of the requirement to recognize the funded status of the Company benefit plans as of December 31, 2006, the Company recorded an increase in its pension liability of approximately $8,300,000, a decrease of approximately $1,300,000 in other assets: other, net and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of approximately $5,800,000, net of tax.

In September 2006, FASB issued FAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures aboutregarding level 3 fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged provided that the reporting company has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS 157 to have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits. This interpretation also


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 will becomeThose disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 482010, and for fiscal year 2007 and the impact is not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 156 “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140,” (FAS 156). FAS 156 amends FAS Statement No.140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. FAS 156 addresses the recognition and measurement of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities and provides an approach to simplify efforts to obtain hedge-like (offset) accounting. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 156 for fiscal year 2007 and the impact is not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (FAS 155). FAS 155 amends FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” and FAS 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,” and allows an entity to remeasure at fair value a hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation from the host, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the instrument would be recognized in earnings. The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 155 for fiscal year 2007 and the impact is not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued FAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Correction Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3” (FAS 154). FAS 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” (APB 20), and FASB Statement No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements,” and changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. APB 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principles be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. FAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle. FAS 154 defines retrospective application as the application of a different accounting principle to prior accountinginterim periods as if that principle had always been used. FAS 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle. The impact was not material to its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” (FAS 153). The amendments made by FAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Previously, Opinion No. 29 required that the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded amount of the asset relinquished. The statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurringwithin those



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

in (2) Accounting Policies (Continued)


fiscal periods beginning after the date of issuance.years. The provisions of this statement were applied prospectively andCompany is evaluating the impact wasthat this update will have but does not expect the adoption to have a material to the Company’simpact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2004,October 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (FAS 151). FAS 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,”an accounting standard update to clarify theaddress accounting for inventory costs. The provisionsmultiple-deliverable arrangements, specifically addressing how to separate deliverables and how to measure and allocate arrangement consideration to one or more units of this statement areaccounting. This update established a hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. This standard also expands disclosures relating to an entity's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This update is effective prospectively for all arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.2010. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact was not material toon the Company’sCompany's consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued a new standard which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This standard also establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in the preparation of non-governmental financial statements. This standard is effective for all interim and annual financial statements issued after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued a new standard which requires an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether the variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest. This statement also requires an entity to regularly reassess whether the entity has a controlling financial interest in the variable interest or interests. This statement will also expand disclosures on variable interest or interests in the footnotes. This standard is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009 as well as the interim period therein. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        In June 2009, the FASB issued a new standard which eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity as defined in other GAAP literature. This statement also establishes more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale and changes the initial measurement of a transferor's interest in transferred financial assets. This statement expands disclosures for interim and annual reports and is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

(3) Discontinued Operations

        In September 2009, the Company's Board of Directors approved the sale of its investment in CWV. CWV is a manufacturer of large diameter hydraulic-actuated butterfly valves for thermo-power and hydro-power plants, water distribution projects and water works projects in China. Management determined that CWV's business no longer fit strategically with the Company. The Company completed the sale of CWV in January 2010. See Note 5 for further information related to CWV.

        The Company evaluated the classification of the assets and liabilities of CWV and concluded that the net assets qualified as discontinued operations. The Company evaluated the fair value less cost to sell of the net assets of CWV and recorded an estimated pre-tax non-cash loss of approximately $8.5 million based on the final agreement with the buyer (level 1). The Company concluded that the future cash flows associated with CWV will be completely eliminated from the continuing operations of



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(3) Discontinued Operations (Continued)


the Company. As such, the Company classified CWV's result of operations and the loss from the disposition as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

        In May 2009, the Company liquidated its TEAM business, located in Ammanford, U.K. TEAM custom designed and manufactured manipulated pipe and hose tubing assemblies and served the heating, ventilation and air conditioning and automotive markets in Western Europe. Management determined the business no longer fit strategically with the Company and that a sale of TEAM was not feasible. On May 22, 2009, the Company appointed an administrator for TEAM under the United Kingdom Insolvency Act of 1986. During the administration process, the administrator has sole control over, and responsibility for, TEAM's operations, assets and liabilities. The Company deconsolidated TEAM when the administrator obtained control of TEAM. The deconsolidation resulted in the recognition of a $18.0 million pre-tax non-cash loss in 2009. The Company evaluated the operations of TEAM and determined that it will not have a continuing involvement in TEAM's operations and cash flows. As a result of the loss of control, TEAM's cash flows and operations have been eliminated from the continuing operations of the Company. As such, the Company has classified TEAM's results of operations and the loss from deconsolidation as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

In September 1996, the Company divested its Municipal Water Group businesses, which included Henry Pratt, James Jones Company and Edward Barber and Company Ltd. CostsThe discontinued operating expense for 2009 and expenses2008 are related to the Municipal Water Group relate tooperations and write-off of TEAM, operations and estimated loss on the net assets of CWV and legal and settlement costs, net of reserve adjustments, associated with the James Jones Litigation (see Note 15).

In 2004 the Company divested its interest in its minority-owned subsidiary Jameco International, LLC (Jameco LLC) that had been previously consolidated as a result of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities—Revised” (FIN 46R). Jameco LLC was recorded in the North American segment. Management determined that Jameco LLC did not have a long-term strategic fit with the Company and decided to divest its interest. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge net of tax of $739,000 to write down its investment to estimated fair value of $250,000. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a net loss of $54,000 from the operations of Jameco LLC. Jameco LLC imports and sells vitreous china, imported faucets and faucet parts and imported bathroom accessories to the North American home improvement retail market.

Condensed operating statements and balance sheets for discontinued operations are summarized below:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net sales—Jameco International, LLC

 

$

 

$

 

$

20,187

 

Costs and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jameco International, LLC

 

 

 

(20,231

)

Municipal Water Group

 

(5,458

)

(679

)

(1,828

)

Loss on disposal of Jameco International, LLC

 

 

 

(1,202

)

Loss before income taxes

 

(5,458

)

(679

)

(3,074

)

Income tax benefit

 

2,101

 

258

 

1,156

 

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

$

(3,357

)

$

(421

)

$

(1,918

)

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Operating income (loss)—TEAM

 $(0.3)$0.4 $0.6 

Operating income (loss)—CWV

  (5.3) 2.0  1.3 

Costs and expenses—Municipal Water Group

  (0.3) (1.1) (0.4)

Write down of net assets—CWV

  (8.5)    

Adjustments to reserves for litigation—Municipal Water Group

  9.5       

Loss on disposal—TEAM

  (18.0)    
        

Income (loss) before income taxes

  (22.9) 1.3  1.5 

Income tax expense (benefit)

  0.7  (0.1) (0.2)
        

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 $(23.6)$1.4 $1.7 
        

        The Company did not recognize any tax benefits on the write down of net assets of CWV as the Company does not believe that it is more likely than not that the tax benefits would be realized.


71




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(3) Discontinued Operations (Continued)

        Revenues reported in discontinued operations are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

$

328

 

$

2,511

 

Deferred income taxes

 

9,751

 

7,044

 

Assets of discontinued operations

 

$

10,079

 

$

9,555

 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

27,852

 

23,068

 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

$

27,852

 

$

23,068

 

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Revenues—CWV

 $11.5 $14.0 $13.2 

Revenues—TEAM

  2.6  13.9  12.8 
        

Total revenues—discontinued operations

 $14.1 $27.9 $26.0 
        

        

The carrying amounts of major classes of assets and liabilities for 2006at December 31, 2009 and 2005 primarily relate to reserves for the James Jones Litigation. Statements of Cash Flows amounts for 2006, 2005 and 2004 primarily relate to operating activities.December 31, 2008 associated with discontinued operations are as follows:

 
 December 31,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Accounts receivable

 $4.2 $5.9 

Inventories

  4.2  5.3 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  2.3  1.9 

Property, plant & equipment, net

  1.3  6.4 

Deferred income taxes

  1.8  10.8 

Intangible assets

  1.5  8.6 

Goodwill

    13.8 
      

Assets of discontinued operations

 $15.3 $52.7 
      

Accounts payable

 $2.1 $2.7 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

  (0.6) 32.5 

Deferred taxes payable

  0.5  2.1 
      

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 $2.0 $37.3 
      

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges

For 2006,        The Company's Board of Directors approves all major restructuring programs that involve the discontinuance of product lines or the shut down of facilities. From time to time, the Company takes additional restructuring actions including involuntary terminations that are not part of a major program. The Company accounts for these costs in the period that the individual employees are notified or the liability is incurred. These costs are included in restructuring and other charges in the



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges (Continued)


Company's consolidated statements of operations. The Company also includes as part of other charges costs associated with asset impairments. A summary of the cost by restructuring program is as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Restructuring costs:

          
 

2007 Actions

 $3.2 $3.8 $5.1 
 

2009 Actions

  9.3     
 

2010 Actions

  4.6     
 

Other Actions

  1.8  2.1  2.4 
        

Total restructuring costs incurred

  18.9  5.9  7.5 

Gain on sale of TWT

  (1.1)    

Non-controlling interest

    (0.2) (0.9)
        

Net restructuring costs and other charges

 $17.8 $5.7 $6.6 
        

        The Company recorded net pre-tax restructuring and other charges in its business segments as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

North America

 $4.3 $4.5 $3.5 

Europe

  5.9  0.2   

China (net of non-controlling interest)

  7.6  1.0  3.1 
        

Total

 $17.8 $5.7 $6.6 
        

        For 2009, pre-tax costs of $4,667,000$1.7 million recorded in costs of goods sold were primarily for manufacturingaccelerated depreciation. Net pre-tax costs of $16.1 million recorded in restructuring and other charges included $8.0 million in severance costs and $9.2 million in other charges, principally $8.4 million in impairment charges for certain long-lived assets and $0.8 million of relocation costs associated with the 2009 actions described below, offset by a $1.1 million gain from the disposition of Tianjin Tanggu Watts Valve Co. Ltd. (TWT). The TWT gain was deferred from the year ended December 31, 2008 until local government approvals were finalized. Of the $8.0 million in severance costs, approximately $1.6 million relates to involuntary termination benefits incurred during 2009 which were not part of a previously announced restructuring plan, $4.2 million were associated with the 2010 actions described below, $1.7 million were associated with the 2009 actions described below and $0.5 million related primarily to involuntary termination benefits and relocation expenses associated with the 2007 actions described below.

        Also, during 2009, the Company recorded a tax charge of $3.9 million related to previously realized tax benefits in China, which the Company expects will be recaptured as a result of the Company's decision to restructure its operations in 2009. This tax charge is part of the 2009 actions.

        For 2008, pre-tax costs of $0.3 million recorded in costs of goods sold were primarily for accelerated depreciation. Pre-tax costs of $5.6 million recorded in restructuring and other charges were primarily severance costs, asset write-downs, accelerated depreciation related to the Company’s Company's



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges (Continued)


relocation and restructuring plan forof its then 60% owned Chinese joint venture. Of the $5.6 million in restructuring costs, approximately $2.2 million relates to involuntary termination benefits incurred during 2008 which were not part of a previously announced restructuring plan and $3.4 million related primarily to involuntary termination benefits and relocation expenses associated with the 2007 actions described below. The Company recordedalso recognized income of $5,648,000$0.2 million in non-controlling interest representing the 40% liability of its then Chinese joint venture partner in the restructuring plan.

        For 2007, the Company recorded pre-tax charges of approximately $7.5 million. Pre-tax costs of $4.3 million recorded in costs of goods sold were primarily for product line discontinuances, of which $1.2 million relates to product line discontinuances and accelerated depreciation related to the Company's relocation of its then 60% owned Chinese joint venture which were not part of a previously announced restructuring plan. Pre-tax costs of $3.2 million recorded in restructuring and other (income) charges which is primarily comprisedconsisted of gains$2.0 million for asset write-downs and severance costs in both China and North America and $1.2 million of approximately $8,188,000accelerated depreciation related to the salesCompany's relocation of buildings in Italy, partially offset by chargesits then 60% owned Chinese joint venture which was not part of approximately $2,150,000 for severance costs related to the Company’s European restructuring plans and approximately $390,000 for accelerated amortization related to the Company’s Chinesea previously announced restructuring plan. The Company also recognized income of $1,530,000$0.9 million in minority interest representing the 40% liability of its then Chinese joint venture partnerpartners in the restructuring plan.

        The following information outlines the Company's current restructuring plans.

2007 Actions

        During 2007, the Company undertook a review of certain product lines and its overall manufacturing capacity. Based on that review, the Company initiated a global restructuring program that was approved by the Company's Board of Directors on October 30, 2007. The Company recordedalso discontinued certain product lines. This program included the shutdown of several manufacturing facilities and the right-sizing of another facility. The restructuring program and charges net of recoveries, of  $2,545,000 and $2,968,000 for 2005 and 2004, respectively. The expenses incurred for 2005certain product line discontinuances was expected to include pre-tax charges totaling approximately $12.9 million. Charges were primarily for accelerated depreciation for both the planned closure of a U.S. manufacturing plantasset write-downs and a reduction in the estimated useful lives of certain manufacturing equipment,expected net losses on asset disposals, severance costs and facility exit and other costs. Annual cash savings, net of recoveries and for European severance related charges and asset write-downs.tax, are estimated to be $1.1 million, which are expected to be fully realized by 2010.

        The expenses incurred for 2004 were primarily for accelerated depreciation for bothCompany reviewed the planned closure of a U.S. manufacturing plant and a reductionremaining activities associated with the 2007 actions associated with Europe. Due in the estimated useful lives of certain manufacturing equipment and for severance costs.

Asset write-downs consist primarily of write-offs of inventory relatedlarge part to product lines thatthis review, the Company has discontinued asconcluded that no further charges will be incurred under this program. In February 2010, the Company's Board of Directors approved a new program for Europe to be launched in 2010 that will include some of the components identified in the 2007 actions. The following table presents the total pre-tax charges incurred for the global restructuring program and product line discontinuances initiated in 2007 by the Company's reportable segments:

Reportable Segment
 Total Expected
Costs
 Incurred through
December 31, 2009
 
 
 (in millions)
 

North America

 $5.7 $8.6 

Europe

  3.9  0.6 

China (exclusive of non-controlling interest)

  3.3  2.9 
      

Total

 $12.9 $12.1 
      

        North America incurred restructuring costs in excess of the planned amount primarily due to the write-down of a vacated facility to its estimated fair value. As part of this restructuringthe 2007 plan, and are primarily recorded in cost of goods sold. Accelerated depreciation is based on shorter remaining estimated useful lives of certain fixed assets and is primarily recorded in cost of goods sold. Other costs consist primarily of gains on sales of buildings in 2006 and of removal and shipping costs associated with relocation of manufacturing equipment in 2005. Other costs have been primarily recorded in cost of goods sold and have been expensed as incurred. Severance costs are primarily recorded in restructuring and other charges for the European restructuring plan and in cost of goods sold for the Chinese restructuring plan.Company




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges (Continued)


closed one facility and consolidated the operations into an existing facility. The plan, when created, called for the sale of the building once vacated. The plan did not anticipate the significant downturn in the commercial real estate market, which occurred shortly after the consolidation was completed in 2008. As a result of the continued poor commercial real estate market conditions, in 2009 the Company recorded a reduction in the carrying cost of the building to its estimated fair value, less the estimated costs to sell, of $2.3 million. The remaining excess was primarily as a result of higher costs incurred to complete the consolidation of the two facilities than originally anticipated.

        The following table summarizes incurred cost for 2007 restructuring actions by segment:

 
 Costs incurred
Year Ended
December 31,
2009
 Costs incurred
Year Ended
December 31,
2008
 Costs incurred
Year Ended
December 31,
2007
 
 
 (in millions)
 

North America

 $2.8 $2.3 $3.5 

Europe

  0.4  0.2   

China (exclusive of minority interest)

    1.3  1.6 
        

Total

 $3.2 $3.8 $5.1 
        

Details of the Company’s manufacturingCompany's 2007 restructuring plansactions through December 31, 20062009 are as follows:

 

 

Restructuring

 

Asset Write-downs

 

Other Costs

 

Minority Interest

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance as of December 31, 2003

 

 

$

41

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

41

 

Provisions during 2004

 

 

95

 

 

 

2,873

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,968

 

Utilized during 2004

 

 

(136

)

 

 

(2,873

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,009

)

Balance as of December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions during 2005

 

 

729

 

 

 

1,360

 

 

 

456

 

 

 

 

 

2,545

 

Utilized during 2005

 

 

(729

)

 

 

(1,360

)

 

 

(456

)

 

 

 

 

(2,545

)

Balance as of December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provisions during 2006

 

 

6,701

 

 

 

506

 

 

 

(8,188

)

 

 

(1,530

)

 

(2,511

)

Utilized during 2006

 

 

(2,513

)

 

 

(506

)

 

 

8,188

 

 

 

1,530

 

 

6,699

 

Balance as of December 31, 2006

 

 

$

4,188

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

 

$

4,188

 

 
 Severance Asset write-
downs
 Product line
discontinuance
 Facility exit
and other
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance as of December 31, 2006

 $ $ $ $ $ 

Net pre-tax restructuring charges

  0.6  1.3  3.1  0.1  5.1 

Utilization

  (0.5) (1.3) (3.1) (0.1) (5.0)
            

Balance at December 31, 2007

  0.1        0.1 

Net pre-tax restructuring charges

  1.5  0.6    1.7  3.8 

Utilization

  (1.6) (0.6)   (1.7) (3.9)
            

Balance at December 31, 2008

           

Net pre-tax restructuring charges

  0.5  2.6    0.1  3.2 

Utilization

  (0.5) (2.6)   (0.1) (3.2)
            

Balance at December 31, 2009

 $ $ $ $ $ 
            

        The following table summarizes the incurred cost for 2007 restructuring actions by type:

 
 Severance Asset write-
downs
 Product line
discontinuance
 Facility exit
and other
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Costs incurred—year ended December 31, 2007

 $0.6 $1.3 $3.1 $0.1 $5.1 

Costs incurred—year ended December 31, 2008

  1.5  0.6    1.7  3.8 

Costs incurred—year ended December 31, 2009

  0.5  2.6    0.1  3.2 
            

Total costs at December 31, 2009

 $2.6 $4.5 $3.1 $1.9 $12.1 
            

        Other consists primarily of relocation costs.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges (Continued)

2008 Actions

        In 2008, the Company announced a reduction-in-force in its United States workforce. The severance charge of $2.2 million, recorded in 2008, was included in restructuring and other charges related to its North America segment and was substantially spent by the end of 2008.

2009 Actions

        On February 8, 2009, the Board of Directors approved a plan to expand the Company's program to consolidate its manufacturing footprint in North America and China. The plan provides for the closure of three additional plants, with those operations being moved to existing facilities in either North America or China or relocated to a new central facility in the United States.

        The footprint consolidation pre-tax charge was estimated at approximately $11.7 million, including severance charges of approximately $3.2 million, relocation costs of approximately $3.3 million and asset write-downs of approximately $5.2 million. One-time tax charges of approximately $3.9 million were incurred as part of the relocations. The Company may incur an additional one-time tax charge in connection with the restructuring activities that could range from $0 to $4.4 million, depending on the Company's final plans. Approximately 400 positions could be eliminated by this program. The net after-tax charge for this manufacturing consolidation program is expected to range from $12.8 to $17.2 million ($4.4 million non cash), with costs being incurred in fiscal 2009 and 2010. The Company expects to spend approximately $4.8 million in capital expenditures to consolidate operations.

        The Company is still evaluating the remaining plant consolidations originally anticipated with the 2009 actions. The original plan called for the closure and relocation of the manufacturing activities associated with two facilities located in China. The Company has substantially completed the closure and relocation of one of the facilities during 2009. Throughout 2009, the other facility identified in the plan that was to be closed has improved its operations substantially. Due to this improvement, the Company is evaluating if the closure and relocation of the manufacturing activities for this location is still an appropriate action to take. The Company expects to conclude on the additional actions in 2010.

        The following table summarizes the total estimated pre-tax charges expected, incurred and remaining cost for the footprint consolidation-restructuring program initiated in 2009 by the Company's reportable segments:

Reportable Segment
 Total Expected
Costs
 Incurred through
December 31, 2009
 Remaining Costs 
 
  
 (in millions)
  
 

North America

 $2.7 $0.8 $1.9 

China

  9.0  8.5  0.5 
        

Total

 $11.7 $9.3 $2.4 
        


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(4) Restructuring and Other (Income) Charges (Continued)

        Details of the Company's footprint consolidation-restructuring program through December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 
 Severance Asset write-
downs
 Facility exit
and other
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $ $ $ $ 

Net pre-tax restructuring charges

  1.8  7.4  0.1  9.3 

Utilization

  (1.8) (7.4) (0.1) (9.3)
          

Balance at December 31, 2009

 $ $ $ $ 
          

2010 Actions

        On February 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a restructuring program with respect to the Company's operating facilities in France. The restructuring program is expected to include the shutdown of three facilities, including two manufacturing sites and one distribution center. The program is expected to include pre-tax charges totaling approximately $12.5 million, including costs for severance, relocation, clean-up and certain asset write-downs, and result in the elimination of approximately 95 positions. Total net after-tax charges for this restructuring program are expected to be approximately $8.3 million ($1.1 million in non-cash charges), with costs being incurred through 2011. The Company expects to spend approximately $6.6 million in capital expenditures to consolidate operations. Annual cash savings, net of tax, are estimated to be $3.9 million, which the Company expects to fully realize by 2012. The Company recorded certain severance costs related to this program in 2009 as the amounts related to contractual or statutory obligations.

Reportable Segment
 Total Expected
Costs
 Incurred through
December 31, 2009
 Remaining Costs 
 
 (in millions)
 

Europe

 $12.5 $4.6 $7.9 

        Details of the Company's footprint consolidation-restructuring program through December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 
 Severance Asset write-
downs
 Facility exit
and other
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 $ $ $ $ 

Net pre-tax restructuring charges

  4.2    0.4  4.6 

Utilization

      (0.4) (0.4)
          

Balance at December 31, 2009

 $4.2 $ $ $4.2 
          

(5) Business Acquisitions and Disposition

The following acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, their results have been included in the Company’s consolidated results of operation since their respective dates of acquisition.

On August 14, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary ofMay 30, 2008, the Company acquired 100%all of the outstanding stock of Black Teknigas, Limited (Teknigas) located in St. Neots, United KingdomBlücher Metal A/S (Blücher) for approximately $8,700,000, which is$183.5 million. The purchase price consisted of $170.1 million in cash and the assumption of debt of $13.4 million, net of cash acquiredacquired. Blücher is a leading provider of approximately $300,000.stainless steel drainage systems in Europe to the residential, commercial and industrial market places and is a worldwide leader in providing stainless steel drainage products to the marine industry. Blücher provides



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(5) Business Acquisitions and Disposition (Continued)


the Company with a new product platform in Europe while allowing the Company to offer a broader product line to its existing customer base. The allocations for goodwill andCompany completed a purchase price allocation that resulted in the recognition of $64.5 million in intangible assets and $89.5 million in goodwill. Intangible assets are approximately $3,585,000 and $4,493,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets iscomprised primarily for technology andof customer relationships that haveand patents with estimated useful lives ranging from 6 to 9of 10 years and trade names with indefinite lives. Teknigas designs, develops and manufactures a rangeThe consolidated results of gas control products and systems for combustion, industrial, medical, laboratory and specialty gas.operations include the results of Blücher since the acquisition date of May 30, 2008.

On June 7, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary        During the second quarter of the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Kim Olofsson Safe Corporation AB (KimSafe) located in Almhult, Sweden for approximately $5,800,000, which is net of cash acquired of approximately $2,900,000. The allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $887,000 and $4,436,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated useful lives of 5 years and trade names with indefinite lives. KimSafe manufactures electronic controls for heat pump, solar and pellet heaters, which provide the ability to heat water using renewable energy.

On June 2, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company acquired the assets and business of Calflex Manufacturing, Inc. (Calflex) located in Vernon, California and the stock of Ningbo Best Metal & Plastic Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (Ningbo) located in Ningbo, China for an aggregate of approximately $6,600,000. The allocation for intangible assets is approximately $2,389,000. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships that have estimated useful lives of 12 years and trade names with indefinite lives. Calflex and Ningbo distribute and manufacture water connectors.




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

On May 19, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of ATS Expansion Group (ATS) located in Sorgues, Grenoble and Houtvillers, France for approximately $62,100,000, which is net of cash acquired of approximately $5,600,000 plus assumed debt of approximately $14,100,000. The preliminary allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $32,690,000 and $26,520,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for customer relationships with estimated useful of 6 years, patents with estimated useful lives ranging from 6 to 12 years and trade names with indefinite lives. ATS’ products include a broad range of fittings, valves and manifolds for water, gas and heating applications and stainless steel flexible hoses. The purchase price allocation for ATS is preliminary pending the final determination of fair values of intangible assets and certain assumed assets and liabilities.

On April 26, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company acquired the assets and business of Changsha Valve Works (Changsha) located in Changsha, China for approximately $9,200,000, of which approximately $1,184,000 remains to be paid subject to certain conditions being met. The preliminary allocations for goodwill and intangible assets are approximately $3,447,000 and $3,971,000, respectively. The amount recorded as intangible assets is primarily for non-compete agreements that have estimated useful lives of 10 years and customer order backlog with an estimated useful life of 1 year. Changsha is a leading manufacturer of large diameter hydraulic-actuated butterfly valves for thermo-power and hydro-power plants, water distribution projects and water works projects in China.  The purchase price allocation for Changsha is preliminary pending the final determination of fair values of certain assumed assets and liabilities.

On April 5, 2006, a wholly owned subsidiary of2008, the Company completed the planned increaseacquisition of the remaining 40% ownership of its joint venture in China, TWT, for $3.3 million in cash. TWT manufactured products to support the U.S. operations as well as to sell into the local China market. In the third quarter of 2008, the Company relocated the business supporting the U.S. from TWT into an existing operation in China. The Company then entered into an agreement to sell TWT. Under this agreement, the Company determined that the risks and rewards of ownership of TWT were effectively transferred to the buyer as of October 18, 2008. The Company further determined that it was no longer the primary beneficiary of the operating results of TWT and therefore deconsolidated TWT as of October 18, 2008. The Company recognized a $1.1 million gain from the sale in Watts Stern Rubinetti, S.r.l. (Stern)2009 upon the final approval of the transfer by Chinese government authority. See Note 3 for additional information concerning dispositions.

        Certain acquisition agreements from 85% to 100%. The price paid for this additional 15% interest was approximately $387,000.

Certain prior years acquisition agreements contain either an earn-out provision or a put feature on the remaining common stock not yet purchased by the Company.provisions. In 2006,2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company accrued approximately $4,000,000 in$0.5 million, $0.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for earn-out provisions which were charged to goodwill and will bewere paid in 2007. During 2005, the Company charged to operations approximately $1,500,000 in earn-out costs from a prior year acquisition, which were also paid in 2005.following each earn-out. The calculations are typically based on a multiple of future gross margins or operating earnings as defined in the agreements. The amount

(6) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

        Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of a certain contingent consideration agreement is not determinable beyond a reasonable doubt and therefore no liability has been established for that agreement. All future earn-outs payments, if any, will be accounted for as additional purchase price.the following:

 
 Foreign
Currency
Translation
 Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Balance December 31, 2007

 $77.2 $(8.5)$68.7 

Change in period

  (51.8) (16.7) (68.5)
        

Balance December 31, 2008

  25.4  (25.2) 0.2 

Change in period

  26.2  3.7  29.9 
        

Balance December 31, 2009

 $51.6 $(21.5)$30.1 
        



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(6) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following:

 

 

Foreign
Currency
Translation
and Other

 

Pension
Adjustment

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance December 31, 2004

 

 

$

32,467

 

 

 

$

(5,849

)

 

 

$

26,618

 

 

Change in period

 

 

(19,377

)

 

 

(1,978

)

 

 

(21,355

)

 

Balance December 31, 2005

 

 

13,090

 

 

 

(7,827

)

 

 

5,263

 

 

Change in period

 

 

25,006

 

 

 

(4,919

)

 

 

20,087

 

 

Balance December 31, 2006

 

 

$

38,096

 

 

 

$

(12,746

)

 

 

$

25,350

 

 

(7) Inventories, net

Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Raw materials

 

$

103,587

 

$

84,087

 

Work in process

 

39,593

 

23,201

 

Finished goods

 

173,236

 

135,549

 

 

 

$

316,416

 

$

242,837

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Raw materials

 $88.0 $106.7 

Work in process

  36.5  43.2 

Finished goods

  142.2  183.8 
      

 $266.7 $333.7 
      

        

Finished goods of $18,275,000$13.8 million and $15,423,000$19.1 million as of December 31, 20062009 and 2005,2008, respectively, were consigned.

(8) Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Land

 

$

12,532

 

$

12,274

 

Buildings and improvements

 

124,321

 

99,217

 

Machinery and equipment

 

247,352

 

210,695

 

Construction in progress

 

7,718

 

6,626

 

 

 

391,923

 

328,812

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(185,763

)

(163,813

)

 

 

$

206,160

 

$

164,999

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Land

 $13.7 $14.8 

Buildings and improvements

  128.7  145.0 

Machinery and equipment

  300.4  289.2 

Construction in progress

  12.1  7.6 
      

  454.9  456.6 

Accumulated depreciation

  (248.4) (225.6)
      

 $206.5 $231.0 
      



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes

The significant components of the Company’sCompany's deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Deferred income tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Excess tax over book depreciation

 

$

16,032

 

$

12,874

 

Intangibles

 

18,777

 

10,522

 

Other

 

11,098

 

10,654

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

45,907

 

34,050

 

Deferred income tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

16,957

 

13,641

 

Net operating loss carry-forward

 

3,343

 

4,450

 

Inventory reserves

 

8,024

 

7,707

 

Other

 

9,737

 

10,989

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

38,061

 

36,787

 

Less: valuation allowance

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

 

38,061

 

36,787

 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 

$

(7,846

)

$

2,737

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Deferred income tax liabilities:

       
 

Excess tax over book depreciation

 $16.4 $15.8 
 

Intangibles

  30.5  31.4 
 

Other

  9.5  8.5 
      
  

Total deferred tax liabilities

  56.4  55.7 

Deferred income tax assets:

       
 

Accrued expenses

  21.6  23.9 
 

Net operating loss carry-forward

  10.0  4.3 
 

Inventory reserves

  6.3  10.3 
 

Other

  23.7  28.6 
      
  

Total deferred tax assets

  61.6  67.1 

Less: valuation allowance

  (9.8) (4.7)
      
 

Net deferred tax assets

  51.8  62.4 
      
 

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 $(4.6)$6.7 
      

        

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations is based on the following pre-tax income:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Domestic

 

$

49,597

 

$

46,418

 

$

39,300

 

Foreign

 

66,512

 

39,393

 

33,372

 

 

 

$

116,109

 

$

85,811

 

$

72,672

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Domestic

 $21.5 $0.9 $47.6 

Foreign

  50.8  67.1  61.5 
        

 $72.3 $68.0 $109.1 
        


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes (Continued)

        

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Current tax expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

18,037

 

$

15,209

 

$

15,428

 

Foreign

 

20,453

 

14,027

 

10,380

 

State

 

4,067

 

3,484

 

3,318

 

 

 

42,557

 

32,720

 

29,126

 

Deferred tax expense (benefit):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(1,638

)

(963

)

(4,044

)

Foreign

 

(1,531

)

(747

)

(331

)

State

 

(372

)

(219

)

(817

)

 

 

(3,541

)

(1,929

)

(5,192

)

 

 

$

39,016

 

$

30,791

 

$

23,934

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Current tax expense:

          
 

Federal

 $1.9 $7.5 $19.2 
 

Foreign

  23.5  24.2  20.0 
 

State

  0.6  1.9  4.8 
        

  26.0  33.6  44.0 
        

Deferred tax expense (benefit):

          
 

Federal

  6.8  (0.2) (5.6)
 

Foreign

  (3.3) (7.4) (0.9)
 

State

  1.8  (1.3) (1.3)
        

  5.3  (8.9) (7.8)
        

 $31.3 $24.7 $36.2 
        

        




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Actual income taxes reported from continuing operations are different than would have been computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes. The reasons for this difference are as follows:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Computed expected federal income expense

 

$

40,638

 

$

30,033

 

$

25,435

 

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

 

2,402

 

2,122

 

1,626

 

Foreign tax rate differential

 

(4,359

)

(508

)

(1,632

)

Tax credits

 

 

 

(1,041

)

Other, net

 

335

 

(856

)

(454

)

 

 

$

39,016

 

$

30,791

 

$

23,934

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Computed expected federal income expense

 $25.3 $23.8 $38.2 

State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

  1.5  0.4  2.3 

Foreign tax rate differential

  2.5  (6.9) (2.4)

Valuation allowance

    4.2   

Goodwill impairment

    3.2   

Other, net

  2.0    (1.9)
        

 $31.3 $24.7 $36.2 
        

        

At December 31, 2006,2009, the Company has foreign net operating loss carry forwards of $10,800,000$38.9 million for income tax purposes. $9,100,000purposes; $5.6 million of the losses can be carried forward indefinitely, and $1,700,000$6.9 million of the losses expiresexpire in 2008.2014, $5.0 million expire in 2016, $5.1 million expire in 2017, and $16.3 million expire in 2018. The net operating losses consist of $7,400,000$5.5 million related to German operations, $1,700,000$0.1 million to Austrian operations, $26.4 million to Dutch operations, and $1,700,000$6.9 related to Chinese operations.


The
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(9) Income Taxes (Continued)

        At December 31, 2009, the Company did not providehad a valuation allowance of $9.8 million. In the U.S., $4.6 million relates to a capital loss as management believes it is not more likely than not that the Company would use such loss within the applicable carryforward period. In Europe, a valuation allowance of December 31, 2006 or 2005 against$3.0 million pertains to a portion of the net operating loss carry forwards. The Company’s earnings relatedin our Dutch operations. In China, a valuation allowance of $2.2 million relates to certain German operations have improved; thereforeTWVC's deferred tax assets that the Company believes thatwill not be utilized. The entire $4.7 million beginning of year valuation allowance pertained to the U.S. capital loss. The Company does not have a valuation allowance is no longer necessary.

The Companyon other deferred tax assets, as management believes that it is more likely than not that itthe Company will be able to recover the net deferred tax assets.

        Enacted changes in income tax laws did not have a material effect on the Company in 2009, 2008 or 2007.

Undistributed earnings of the Company’sCompany's foreign subsidiaries amounted to approximately $168,900,000$320.3 million at December 31, 2006.2009, $311.7 million at December 31, 2008, and $249.9 million at December 31, 2007. Those earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes has been recorded thereon. Upon distribution of those earnings, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company will be subject to withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of U.S. income tax liability that would be incurred is not practicable because of the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation; however, unrecognized foreign tax credits wouldmay be available to reduce some portion of any U.S. income tax liability. Withholding taxes of approximately $2,780,000$7.2 million would be payable upon remittance of all previously unremitted earnings at December 31, 2006.2009.

The American Job Creation Act of 2004 (the AJCA) was signed into federal law on October 22, 2004. The AJCA contain a one-time foreign dividend repatriation provision. This provision provides an 85% special deduction with respect to certain qualifying dividends from foreign subsidiaries for a limited period. The Company did not repatriate any dividends from foreign affiliates under this provision.




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(10) Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Commissions and sales incentives payable

 

$

37,015

 

$

30,807

 

Accrued insurance

 

15,064

 

11,836

 

Other

 

39,287

 

21,255

 

Income taxes payable

 

9,071

 

3,173

 

 

 

$

100,437

 

$

67,071

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commissions and sales incentives payable

 $37.2 $41.2 

Accrued product liability and workers' compensation

  32.5  30.5 

Other

  34.2  25.6 

Income taxes payable

  2.0  4.1 
      

 $105.9 $101.4 
      


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(11) Financing Arrangements

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

5.85% notes due April 2016

 

$

225,000

 

$

 

4.87% notes due May 2010

 

50,000

 

50,000

 

5.47% notes due May 2013

 

75,000

 

75,000

 

$350,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility maturing in April 2011. Eurocurrency rate loans interest accruing at LIBOR or Euro LIBOR plus an applicable percentage (Euro LIBOR at 3.6% and 2.7% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively) (LIBOR 5.0% at December 31, 2005) At December 31, 2006, $91,059,000 was for euro based borrowings and there were no outstanding U.S. borrowings. At December 31, 2005, $40,263,000 were for euro based borrowings and $127,000,000 were for U.S. borrowings.

 

91,059

 

167,263

 

Hunter Innovations notes with principal payable in three equal annual installments, accruing interest monthly, due May 2006 (annual interest rate of 5.0% at December 31, 2005)

 

 

3,750

 

Variable rate demand bonds (4.3% at December 31, 2005)

 

 

8,900

 

Other—consists primarily of European borrowings (at interest rates ranging from 3.7% to 8.5%)

 

8,160

 

2,072

 

 

 

449,219

 

306,985

 

Less Current Maturities

 

7,522

 

13,635

 

 

 

$

441,697

 

$

293,350

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

5.85% notes due April 2016

 $225.0 $225.0 

4.87% notes due May 2010

  50.0  50.0 

5.47% notes due May 2013

  75.0  75.0 

$350.0 million Revolving Credit Facility maturing in April 2011. Eurocurrency rate loans interest accruing at LIBOR or Euro LIBOR plus an applicable percentage (Euro LIBOR at 0.4% at December 31, 2008). At December 31, 2009, there were no outstanding U.S. or euro based borrowings. At December 31, 2008, $55.0 million was for euro based borrowings and there were no outstanding U.S. borrowings. 

    55.0 

Other—consists primarily of European borrowings (at interest rates ranging from 4.1% to 6.0%)

  4.9  9.3 
      

  354.9  414.3 

Less Current Maturities

  50.9  4.5 
      

 $304.0 $409.8 
      

        

Principal payments during each of the next five years and thereafter are due as follows (in thousands)millions): 2007—$7,522; 2008—$235; 2009—$209; 2010—$50,194;50.9; 2011—$91,0590.7; 2012—$0.7; 2013—$75.7; 2014—$0.8 and thereafter—$300,000.226.1.

The Company maintains letters of credit that guarantee its performance or payment to third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. Amounts outstanding were approximately $49,637,000$37.0 million as of December 31, 20062009 and $48,651,000$39.3 million as of December 31, 2005.2008. The Company’sCompany's letters of credit are primarily associated with insurance coverage and to a lesser extent foreign purchases. The Company’s




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Company's letters of credit generally expire within one year of issuance and are drawn down against the revolving credit facility. The increase is primarily associated with insurance coverage. These instruments may exist or expire without being drawn down. Therefore, they do not necessarily represent future cash flow obligations.

On April 27, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of $225,000,000$225.0 million of 5.85% senior unsecured notes due April 2016 (the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement). The 2006 Note Purchase Agreement includes operational and financial covenants, with which the Company is required to comply, including, among others, maintenance of certain financial ratios and restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens and dispositions. Events of default under the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement include failure to comply with its financial and operational covenants, as well as bankruptcy and other insolvency events. The Company may, at its option, upon notice to the noteholders, prepay at any time all or part of the Notes in an amount not less than $1$1.0 million by paying the principal amount plus a make-whole amount, which is dependent upon the yield of respective U.S. Treasury Securities. The Company used the net proceeds from the private placement to repay $147,000,000 outstanding under its revolving credit facility. The balance of the net proceeds will be used to finance future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement. The payment of interest on the senior unsecured notes is due semi-annually on April 30th and October 30th of each year. Additionally, the Company amended its 2003 Note Purchase Agreement to reflect the existence of the subsidiary guarantors and to substantially conform certain provisions of the 2003 Note Purchase Agreement to the 2006 Note Purchase Agreement.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(11) Financing Arrangements (Continued)

On April 27, 2006, the Company amended and restated its unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks (as amended, the revolving credit facility). The revolving credit facility provides for multi-currency unsecured borrowings and stand-by letters of credit of up to $350,000,000$350.0 million and expires in April 2011. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility bear interest at a fluctuating rate per annum equal to an applicable percentage equal to (i) in the case of Eurocurrency rate loans, the British Bankers Association LIBOR rate plus an applicable percentage of 0.60%0.625%, which is determined by reference to the Company’sCompany's consolidated leverage ratio and debt rating, or (ii) in the case of base rate loans and swing line loans, the higher of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as announced by Bank of America, N.A. as its “prime"prime rate." For 2006,2009, the average interest rate under the revolving credit facility for euro-based borrowings was approximately 3.5%2.2%. The revolving credit facility includes operational and financial covenants customary for facilities of this type, including, among others, restrictions on additional indebtedness, liens and investments and maintenance of certain leverage ratios. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the revolving credit facility; the Company had $226,300,000$314.4 million of unused and potentially available credit under the revolving credit facility; had no U.S dollar denominated debtfacility and $91,059,000 of euro-based borrowings outstanding on its revolving credit facility; and had $32,641,000$35.6 million for stand-by letters of credit outstanding on its revolving credit facility.

At the closing of the Dormont acquisition, Dormont had long-term debt outstanding of $8,900,000 in the form of two series of taxable variable rate demand bonds (1998 Series with $1,500,000 outstanding and the 2000 Series with $7,400,000 outstanding) which, due Due primarily to the provisions ofcurrent leverage ratio, the trust agreements,Company could only be redeemed at dates subsequent toborrow approximately $108.5 million under the closing. Each of these bonds was secured by a letterexisting facility, excluding the stand-by-letters of credit, from a bank, which maintained a security interest inbefore it would violate the assets of Dormont. As a condition of the purchase and to gain the bank’s consent to the sale of Dormont to the Company, Dormont’s former owners were required to establish a cash collateral account for the bonds in an amount equal to the potential obligation




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

of Dormont to the bank under the letter of credit reimbursement agreements. The entire obligation under the bonds approximates $9,096,000, which represents the $8,900,000 in bond principal plus interest and related fees. At closing, a portion of the Dormont purchase price was placed in a cash collateral account as a guarantee of payment. The Company recorded this escrow deposit in prepaid expenses and other assets at December 31, 2005. The 1998 series bonds were repaid in full on January 17, 2006 and the 2000 series bonds were repaid in full on February 1, 2006 by the former owners using the cash collateral account.above covenants.

Effective July 1, 2005, the Company entered into a three-year interest rate swap with a counter party for a notional amount of 25,000,000, which was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. The Company swapped three-month EURIBOR plus 0.6% for a fixed rate of 3.02%. The change in the fair value of the swap during 2006 approximated $673,000 and was recorded as a reduction of interest expense in 2006. The swap was terminated on October 3, 2006.

On May 15, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of $125,000,000$125.0 million of senior unsecured notes consisting of $50,000,000$50.0 million principal amount of 4.87% senior notes due 2010 and $75,000,000$75.0 million principal amount of 5.47% senior notes due 2013. The payment of interest on the senior unsecured notes is due semi-annually on May 15th and November 15th of each year. The senior unsecured notes were issued by Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and arepari passu with the revolving credit facility, which is at the subsidiary level.facility. The senior unsecured notes allow the Company to have (i) debt senior to the notes in an amount up to $150,000,000$150.0 million plus 5% of stockholders’stockholders' equity and (ii) debtpari passu or junior to the senior unsecured notes to the extent the Company maintains compliance with a 2.002.0 to 1.001.0 fixed charge coverage ratio. The notes include a prepayment provision which might require a make-whole payment to the note holders. Such payment is dependent upon the level of the respective treasuries. The notes include other customary terms and conditions, including events of default.

(12) Common Stock

The Class A common stockCommon Stock and Class B common stockCommon Stock have equal dividend and liquidation rights. Each share of the Company’sCompany's Class A common stockCommon Stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to stockholders and each share of Class B common stockCommon Stock is entitled to ten votes on all such matters. Shares of Class B common stockCommon Stock are convertible into shares of Class A common stock,Common Stock, on a one-to-one basis, at the option of the holder. As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Company has reserved a total of 3,881,3084,078,905 of Class A common stockCommon Stock for issuance under its stock-based compensation plans and 7,293,8807,193,880 shares for conversion of Class B common stockCommon Stock to Class A common stock.Common Stock.

On February 6,        In November 2007, the Company’sCompany announced that its Board of Directors approved an amendmenthad authorized a repurchase of up to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of3,000,000 shares of its Class A commonCommon Stock. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had repurchased 2.45 million shares of stock authorized for issuance from 80,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares. This amendment remains subject to approvala total cost of the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for May 2, 2007.$68.1 million.

(13) Stock-Based Compensation

The Company maintains fourthree stock incentive plans under which key employees and outside directors have been granted outstanding incentive stock options (ISOs) and nonqualified stock options (NSOs) to



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)


purchase the Company’sCompany's Class A common stock.Common Stock. Only one plan, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, is currently available for the grant of new equity awards. Stock options granted under prior plans became exercisable over a five-year period at the rate of 20% per year and expire ten years after the date of grant. Under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, options become exercisable over a four -yearfour-year period at the rate of 25% per year




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

and expire ten years after the grant date. ISOs and NSOs granted under the plans may have exercise prices of not less than 100% and 50% of the fair market value of the common stockClass A Common Stock on the date of grant, respectively. The Company’sCompany's current practice is to issuegrant all options at fair market value on the grant date. At December 31, 2006, 2,230,7432009, 2,428,706 shares of Class A common stockCommon Stock were authorized for future grants of optionsnew equity awards under the Company’sCompany's stock optionincentive plans.

The Company has also grantedgrants shares of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee members of the Company’sCompany's Board of Directors under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, which vest either immediately or over three years.a three-year period at the rate of one-third per year. The restricted stock awards are amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

The Company also has a Management Stock Purchase Plan that allows for the purchasegranting of Restricted Stock Unitsrestricted stock units (RSUs) byto key employees. On an annual basis, key employees may elect to receive a portion of uptheir annual incentive compensation in RSUs instead of cash. Each RSU provides the key employee with the right to an aggregate of 1,000,000 sharespurchase a share of Class A common stockCommon Stock at 67% of the fair market value on the date of grant. RSUs vest annually over a three-year period from the dategrant date. An aggregate of grant. On February 6, 2007, the Board2,000,000 shares of Directors of the Company approved an amendment toClass A Common Stock may be issued under the Management Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 1,000,000 shares to 2,000,000 shares. This amendment remains subject to approval of the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for May 2, 2007.Plan.

2004 Stock Incentive Plan

Total        At December 31, 2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested stock options was approximately $4,206,000 at December 31, 2006,$3.9 million with a total weighted average remaining term of 2.8 years. For 2009, 2008 and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a five or four-year vesting period. For 2006,2007, the Company recognized compensation cost of $1,428,000$1.7 million, $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following is a summary of stock option activity and related information:

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Intrinsic
Value

 

Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

(Options in thousands)

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

 

1,089

 

 

 

$

21.70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

$

17.82

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

$

14.90

 

 

Granted

 

 

164

 

 

 

35.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

31.66

 

 

 

254

 

 

 

25.02

 

 

Cancelled

 

 

(7

)

 

 

34.16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(113

)

 

 

21.49

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

16.10

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(106

)

 

 

17.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(108

)

 

 

14.26

 

 

 

(258

)

 

 

14.24

 

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

 

1,140

 

 

 

$

23.96

 

 

 

$

17.15

 

 

 

1,089

 

 

 

$

21.70

 

 

 

1,000

 

 

 

$

17.82

 

 

Exercisable at end of year

 

 

566

 

 

 

$

19.13

 

 

 

$

21.98

 

 

 

422

 

 

 

$

16.05

 

 

 

392

 

 

 

$

14.29

 

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Intrinsic
Value
 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 Options Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
 
 (Options in thousands)
 

Outstanding at beginning of year

  1,216 $26.07     1,168 $25.32  1,140 $23.99 

Granted

  214  26.34     202  29.35  189  33.36 

Cancelled/Forfeitures

  (101) 27.63     (68) 31.68  (94) 31.08 

Exercised

  (29) 14.23     (86) 19.08  (67) 17.17 
                    

Outstanding at end of year

  1,300 $26.25 $4.67  1,216 $26.07  1,168 $25.32 
                    

Exercisable at end of year

  882 $24.98 $5.94  800 $23.22  705 $21.42 
                    

        

As of December 31, 2006,2009, the aggregate intrinsic values of outstanding and exercisable options were approximately $19,558,000 and $12,450,000, respectively,$5.2 million, representing the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the Company’sCompany's closing Class A common stockCommon Stock price of $41.11$30.92 as of December 31, 2006,2009, which would have been received by the



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)


option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for 20062009, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $2,244,000.$0.3 million, $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

        Upon exercise of options, the Company issues shares of Class A common stock.Common Stock.

81






Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at December 31, 2006:2009:

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

 

 

Number
Outstanding

 

Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)

 

Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

 

Number
Exercisable

 

Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

 

 

 

(options in thousands)

 

$10.58

 

 

43

 

 

 

3.6

 

 

 

$

10.58

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

$

10.58

 

 

$11.75—$12.44

 

 

38

 

 

 

3.2

 

 

 

12.03

 

 

 

38

 

 

 

12.03

 

 

$15.40—$35.20

 

 

1,059

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

 

24.98

 

 

 

485

 

 

 

20.46

 

 

 

 

 

1,140

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

$

23.96

 

 

 

566

 

 

 

$

19.13

 

 

 
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise Prices
 Number
Outstanding
 Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)
 Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
 Number
Exercisable
 Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
 
 
 (Options in thousands)
 

$10.56–$14.08

  29  1.93 $10.97  29 $10.97 

$14.09–$17.60

  308  2.93  16.54  308  16.54 

$17.61–$28.16

  353  7.39  25.76  155  25.02 

$28.17–$31.68

  173  8.50  29.35  46  29.35 

$31.69–$35.21

  437  6.34  33.28  344  33.12 
               

  1,300  6.00 $26.25  882 $24.98 
               

        

The fair value of each option granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is estimated on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes-Merton Model, based on the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Expected life (years)

 

5.8

 

5.8

 

5.0

 

Expected stock price volatility

 

35.9

%

36.2

%

20.3

%

Expected dividend yield

 

1.0

%

1.0

%

1.1

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.9

%

4.0

%

3.5

%

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 

Expected life (years)

  6.0  6.0  5.8 

Expected stock price volatility

  41.2% 35.6% 37.2%

Expected dividend yield

  1.7% 1.5% 1.2%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.8% 3.5% 4.6%

        

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant for the respective expected life of the option. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of options and volatility were calculated using historical data. The expected dividend yield of stock is the Company’sCompany's best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 15%6.75% for 2009 for its stock options. These rates were calculated based upon historical activity and are an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from the expected rates, the Company may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods.

The above assumptions were used to determine the weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options of $13.50, $11.54$9.70, $10.10 and $9.01$12.75 for the years ending December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.


Additionally at December 31, 2006, there were 73,463
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

        The following is a summary of unvested shares of restricted stock outstanding that were granted to key employeesactivity and non-employee membersrelated information:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 Shares Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 Shares Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
 
 (Shares in thousands)
 

Unvested at beginning of year

  115 $31.28  89 $34.05  73 $33.62 

Granted

  86  26.21  80  29.35  74  33.21 

Cancelled/Forfeitures

  (16) 29.15  (7) 33.71  (15) 34.10 

Vested

  (68) 30.62  (47) 32.92  (43) 31.85 
                 

Unvested at end of year

  117 $28.20  115 $31.28  89 $34.05 
                 

        The total fair value of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company issued 59,008 shares 5,616 sharesvested during 2009, 2008 and 32,133 shares of restricted stock during 2006, 20052007 was $2.1 million, $1.4 million and 2004, respectively. The restricted shares were issued at fair market prices of between $35.20 and $41.14, $26.71 and between $25.00 and $26.50 in 2006, 2005 and 2004,$1.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006,2009, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock was approximately $1,855,000, which is being amortized on$2.6 million with a straight-line basis over the three-year vesting period.total weighted average remaining term of 2.0 years. For 2006,2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized compensation costs of $599,000$2.0 million, $1.8 million and $1.6 million, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 10%5.2% for restricted stock issued to key employees. The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock granted and outstanding approximated $3,020,000$3.6 million representing the total pre-tax intrinsic value based on the Company’sCompany's closing Class A common stockCommon Stock price of $41.11$30.92 as of December 31, 2006.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2009.

Management Stock Purchase Plan

The        Total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was approximately $1.2 million at December 31, 2009 with a total weighted average remaining term of 1.8 years. For 2009, 2008 and 2007 the Company also has a Management Stock Purchase Plan that allows for the grantingrecognized compensation cost of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) to key employees to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Class A common stock at 67% of the fair market value on the date of grant. RSUs vest annually over a three-year period from the date of grant.$1.2 million, $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses. Dividends declared for RSUs, that are paid to individuals, that remain unpaid at December 31, 20062009 total approximately $210,000.$0.2 million.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Total unrecognized compensation cost relatedNotes to unvested RSUs was approximately $1,210,000 at December 31, 2006, and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a three-year vesting period. For 2006 the Company recognized compensation cost of $958,000 in selling, general and administrative expenses.Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s RSUsCompany's RSU activity and related information for 20062009 is shown in the following table:

 

 

As of December 31, 2006

 

 

 

RSUs

 

Weighted
Average
Purchase Price

 

Intrinsic
Value

 

 

 

(RSUs in thousands)

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

 

328

 

 

 

$

16.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

87

 

 

 

23.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settled

 

 

(68

)

 

 

10.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

 

347

 

 

 

$

19.00

 

 

 

$

22.11

 

 

Vested at end of period

 

 

148

 

 

 

$

15.64

 

 

 

$

25.47

 

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 RSUs Weighted
Average
Purchase Price
 Intrinsic
Value
 RSUs Weighted
Average
Purchase Price
 RSUs Weighted
Average
Purchase Price
 
 
 (RSU's in thousands)
 

Outstanding at beginning of period

  297 $21.86     366 $18.98  347 $19.00 

Granted

  150  13.25     60  19.09  160  25.73 

Cancelled/Forfeitures

  (7) 18.08     (19) 23.23  (31) 25.03 

Settled

  (90) 22.31     (110) 22.06  (110) 15.62 
                    

Outstanding at end of period

  350 $18.13 $12.79  297 $21.86  366 $22.45 
                    

Vested at end of period

  131 $21.12 $9.80  133 $20.27  141 $18.98 
                    

        

As of December 31, 2006,2009, the aggregate intrinsic values of outstanding and vested RSUs were approximately $7,665,000$4.5 million and $3,767,000,$1.3 million, respectively, representing the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the Company’sCompany's closing Class A common stockCommon Stock price of $41.11$30.92 as of December 31, 2006,2009 which would have been received by the RSUs holders had all RSUs settled as of that date. The total intrinsic value of RSUs settled for 20062009, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $1,397,000.$0.1 million, $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Upon settlement of RSUs, the Company issues shares of Class A common stock.Common Stock.

The following table summarizes information about RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2006:2009:

 

 

RSUs Outstanding

 

RSUs Vested

 

Range of Purchase Prices

 

Number
Outstanding

 

Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)

 

Weighted Average
Purchase
Price

 

Number
Vested

 

Weighted Average
Purchase
Price

 

 

 

(RSUs in thousands)

 

$7.98—$8.34

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

8.13

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

$

8.13

 

 

$9.36—$9.54

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.47

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

9.47

 

 

$10.00—$12.30

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.66

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

10.66

 

 

$15.50—$23.34

 

 

307

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

20.22

 

 

 

108

 

 

 

17.84

 

 

 

 

 

347

 

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

$

19.00

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

$

15.64

 

 

 
 RSUs Outstanding RSUs Vested 
Range of Purchase Prices
 Number
Outstanding
 Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Life (years)
 Weighted Average
Purchase
Price
 Number
Vested
 Weighted Average
Purchase
Price
 
 
 (RSUs in thousands)
 

$7.04–$10.56

  29  2.1 $9.44  29 $9.44 

$10.57–$17.60

  147  2.2  13.25     

$17.61–$21.11

  51  1.2  19.09  17  19.09 

$21.12–$24.64

  5  0.7  22.65  5  22.65 

$24.65–$25.73

  118  0.2  25.73  80  25.73 
               

  350  1.4 $18.13  131 $21.12 
               


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(13) Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)

The fair value of each share issued under the Management Stock Purchase Plan is estimated on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes-Merton Model, based on the following weighted average assumptions:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Expected life (years)

 

3.0

 

3.0

 

3.0

 

Expected stock price volatility

 

25.7

%

26.0

%

20.3

%

Expected dividend yield

 

1.5

%

1.4

%

1.2

%

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.5

%

3.4

%

2.3

%

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2009 2008 2007 

Expected life (years)

  3.0  3.0  3.0 

Expected stock price volatility

  45.0% 37.2% 35.3%

Expected dividend yield

  2.2% 1.5% 1.0%

Risk-free interest rate

  1.4% 2.2% 4.8%

        

The risk-free interest rate is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant for the respective expected life of the RSU’s.RSU's. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of RSU’sRSU's and volatility were calculated using historical data. The expected dividend yield of stock is the Company’sCompany's best estimate of the expected future dividend yield. The Company applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 10%5.2% for its RSUs. These rates were calculated based upon historical activity and are an estimate of granted shares not expected to vest. If actual forfeitures differ from the expected rates, the Company may be required to make additional adjustments to compensation expense in future periods.

The above assumptions were used to determine the weighted average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted were $13.60, $12.41of $8.14, $11.44 and $8.41$16.79 during 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.

The Company distributed dividends of $0.36$0.44 per share for 2006, $0.322009, $0.44 per share for 20052008 and $0.28$0.40 per share for 20042007 on the Company’sCompany's Class A common stockCommon Stock and Class B common stock.Common Stock.

(14) Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors funded and unfunded non-contributing defined benefit pension plans that together cover substantially all of its domestic employees. Benefits are based primarily on years of service and employees’employees' compensation. The funding policy of the Company for these plans is to contribute an annual amount that does not exceed the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its plans.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

The funded status of the defined benefit plans and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Change in projected benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of the year

 

$

69,114

 

$

59,225

 

Service cost

 

3,549

 

2,861

 

Administration cost

 

(395

)

(299

)

Plan change

 

679

 

88

 

Interest cost

 

3,780

 

3,351

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

(1,942

)

5,934

 

Benefits paid

 

(2,187

)

(2,046

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

72,598

 

$

69,114

 

Change in fair value of plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of the year

 

$

40,009

 

$

37,021

 

Actual gain on assets

 

1,890

 

3,511

 

Employer contributions

 

3,223

 

1,822

 

Administration cost

 

(395

)

(299

)

Benefits paid

 

(2,187

)

(2,046

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of the year

 

$

42,540

 

$

40,009

 

Funded status at end of year

 

$

(30,058

)

$

(29,105

)

Unrecognized prior service costs

 

*

 

1,310

 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

 

*

 

20,562

 

Contributions after measurement date and on or before fiscal year end

 

6,633

 

29

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

(23,425

)

$

(7,204

)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Change in projected benefit obligation

       

Balance at beginning of the year

 $87.1 $73.4 

Service cost

  4.1  3.4 

Administration cost

  (0.7) (0.8)

Plan change

    0.8 

Interest cost

  5.2  4.7 

Actuarial loss

  3.2  8.1 

Benefits paid

  (2.8) (2.5)
      
 

Balance at end of year

 $96.1 $87.1 
      

Change in fair value of plan assets

       

Balance at beginning of the year

 $44.9 $58.8 

Actual (loss) gain on assets

  9.0  (13.8)

Employer contributions

  16.2  3.2 

Administration cost

  (0.7) (0.8)

Benefits paid

  (2.8) (2.5)
      
 

Fair value of plan assets at end of the year

 $66.6 $44.9 
      

Funded status at end of year

 $(29.5)$(42.2)
      

        

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Current liabilities

 

$

(115

)

$

*

 

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(23,310

)

*

 

Accrued benefit costs

 

*

 

(7,204

)

Minimum pension liability

 

*

 

(13,934

)

Intangible assets

 

*

 

1,310

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

(23,425

)

$

(19,828

)

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Current liabilities

 $(0.1)$(0.1)

Noncurrent liabilities

  (29.4) (42.1)
      

Net amount recognized

 $(29.5)$(42.2)
      

        


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

19,021

 

$

*

 

Prior service cost

 

1,705

 

*

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

20,726

 

$

*

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net actuarial loss

 $32.8 $37.6 

Prior service cost

  2.0  2.3 
      

Net amount recognized

 $34.8 $39.9 
      


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        


*                    Not applicable due to change in accounting standard

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

72,598

 

$

69,114

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

64,328

 

$

61,175

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

$

42,540

 

$

40,009

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Projected benefit obligation

 $96.1 $87.1 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 $88.2 $78.0 

Fair value of plan assets

 $66.6 $44.9 

        

The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows:

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Service cost—benefits earned

 

$

3,549

 

$

2,861

 

$

2,462

 

Interest costs on benefits obligation

 

3,780

 

3,351

 

3,054

 

Expected return on assets

 

(3,502

)

(3,174

)

(2,856

)

Transitional obligation amortization

 

 

 

(148

)

Prior service cost amortization

 

284

 

240

 

229

 

Net actuarial loss amortization

 

1,212

 

862

 

756

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

5,323

 

$

4,140

 

$

3,497

 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Service cost—benefits earned

 $4.1 $3.4 $3.8 

Interest costs on benefits obligation

  5.2  4.7  4.3 

Expected return on assets

  (4.0) (4.9) (4.4)

Prior service cost amortization

  0.3  0.2  0.2 

Net actuarial loss amortization

  3.0  0.4  0.9 

Curtailment charge

      0.2 
        
 

Net periodic benefit cost

 $8.6 $3.8 $5.0 
        

        

The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next year are $1,065,000$2.3 million and $201,000,$0.3 million, respectively.

Additional Information:

 

 

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

$

1,978

 

 


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Assumptions:

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations:

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Discount rate

 

5.875

%

5.50

%

Rate of compensation increase

 

4.00

%

4.00

%

 
 2009 2008 

Discount rate

  6.00% 6.00%

Rate of compensation increase

  4.00% 4.00%

        

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs:

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

Discount rate

 

5.50

%

5.75

%

6.00

%

Long-term rate of return on asset

 

8.50

%

8.50

%

8.50

%

Rate of compensation increase

 

4.00

%

4.00

%

4.00

%

 
 2009 2008 2007 

Discount rate

  6.00% 6.00% 5.87%

Long-term rate of return on assets

  8.50% 8.50% 8.50%

Rate of compensation increase

  4.00% 4.00% 4.00%

        

Discount rates are selected based upon rates of return at the measurement date utilizing a bond matching approach to match the expected benefit cash flows. In selecting the expected long-term rate of return on assets, the Company considers the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits of this plan. This includes considering the trust’strust's asset allocation and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the plan. This basis is consistent with the prior year.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

Plan assets:

The weighted average asset allocations by asset category is as follows:

Asset Category

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Equity securities

 

64.4

%

66.0

%

Debt securities

 

30.0

 

28.3

 

Other

 

5.6

 

5.7

 

Total

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

Asset Category
 2009 2008 

Equity securities

  60.6% 50.3%

Debt securities

  33.4  45.7 

Other

  6.0  4.0 
      

Total

  100.0% 100.0%
      

        

The Company’sCompany's written Retirement Plan Investment Policy sets forth the investment policy, objectives and constraints of the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan. This Retirement Plan Investment Policy, set forth by the Pension Plan Committee, defines general investment principles and directs investment management policy, addressing preservation of capital, risk aversion and adherence to investment discipline. Investment managers are to make a reasonable effort to control risk and are evaluated quarterly against commonly accepted benchmarks to ensure that the risk assumed is commensurate with the given investment style and objectives.

The portfolio is designed to achieve a balanced return of current income and modest growth of capital, while achieving returns in excess of the rate of inflation over the investment horizon in order to preserve purchasing power of Plan assets. All Plan assets are required to be invested in liquid securities. Derivative investments willare not be allowed.

Prohibited investments include, but are not limited to the following: commodities and futures contracts, private placements, options, limited partnerships, venture-capital investments, real estate properties, interest-only (IO), principal-only (PO), and residual tranche CMOs, and Watts Water Technologies, Inc. stock.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Prohibited transactions include, but are not limited to the following: short selling and margin transactions.

Allowable assets include: cash equivalents, fixed income securities, equity securities, mutual funds, and GICs.

Specific guidelines regarding allocation of assets are as follows: equities shall comprise between 25% and 75% of the total portfolio, while fixed income shall comprise between 30% and 65%. Investment performance is monitored on a regular basis and investments are re-allocated to stay within specific guidelines. An equity/fixed income allocation of 55%/45% is preferred. The securities of any one company or government agency should not exceed 10% of the total fund, and no more than 20% of the total fund should be invested in any one industry. Individual treasury securities may represent 50% of the total fund, while the total allocation to treasury bonds and notes may represent up to 100% of the Plan’sPlan's aggregate bond position.



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        The following table presents the investments in the pension plan measured at fair value at December 31, 2009:

 
 Level
1
 Level
2
 Level
3
 Total 
 
 (in millions)
 

Equity securities

             
 

U.S. and non-U.S. equity securities(a)

 $22.2 $ $ $22.2 
 

Other equity securities(b)

  18.3      18.3 

Debt securities

             
 

U.S. government and federal agency

  3.0  6.4    9.4 
 

U.S. and non-U.S. corporate

    2.0    2.0 
 

Other debt securities(c)

  10.8        10.8 

Other investments(d)

    3.9    3.9 
          

Total investments

 $54.3 $12.3 $ $66.6 
          

(a)
Primarily represented by investments in common stock from diverse industries

(b)
Primarily represented by investments in index funds

(c)
Primarily represented by investments in mutual funds

(d)
Primarily represented by investments in money market funds

Cash flows:

The information related to the Company’sCompany's pension funds cash flow is as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Employer Contributions

 

$

9,856

 

$

1,816

 

Benefit Payments

 

$

2,187

 

$

2,046

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Employer Contributions

 $16.2 $3.2 

Benefit Payments

 $2.8 $2.5 

        The Company expects to contribute approximately $10.0 million in 2010.

Contributions expected to be made in 2007 approximate $3,700,000.

Expected benefit payments to be paid by the pension plans are as follows:

 

 

(in thousands)

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2007

 

 

$

2,267

 

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2008

 

 

$

2,368

 

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2009

 

 

$

2,555

 

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2010

 

 

$

2,796

 

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2011

 

 

$

3,003

 

 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2016

 

 

$

19,445

 

 

 
 (in millions) 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2010

 $3.2 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2011

 $3.4 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2012

 $3.7 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2013

 $4.1 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2014

 $4.6 

During fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2019

 $32.2 

        

Additionally, substantially all of the Company’sCompany's domestic employees are eligible to participate in certain 401(k) savings plans. Under these plans, the Company matches a specified percentage of employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. The Company’sCompany's match contributions (included in selling, general and administrative expense) for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $0.5 million,



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)


and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,2008 and 20042007 were $633,000, $423,000, and $421,000,$0.6 million in each year, respectively. Charges for European pension plans approximated $1,900,000, $2,000,000$2.8 million, $3.3 million and $1,900,000$3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005,2009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively. These costs relate to plans administered by certain European subsidiaries, with benefits calculated according to government requirements and paid out to employees upon retirement or change of employment.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

The Company entered into a Supplemental Compensation Agreement (the Agreement) with Timothy P. Horne on September 1, 1996. Per the Agreement, upon ceasing to be an employee of the Company, Mr. Horne must make himself available, as requested by the Board, to work a minimum of 300 but not more than 500 hours per year as a consultant in return for certain annual compensation as long as he is physically able to do so. If Mr. Horne complies with the consulting provisions of the agreement above, he shall receive supplemental compensation on an annual basis of $400,000 per year, subject to cost of living increases each year, in exchange for the services performed, as long as he is physically able to do so. In the event of physical disability, subsequent to commencing consulting services for the Company, Mr. Horne will continue to receive $400,000this payment annually. The payment for consulting services provided by Mr. Horne will be expensed as incurred by the Company. Mr. Horne retired effective December 31, 2002, and therefore the Supplemental Compensation period began on January 1, 2003. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 106, “Employers Accounting for Post Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions”,GAAP, the Company will accrueaccrues for the future post-retirement disability benefits over the period from January 1, 2003, to the time in which Mr. Horne becomes physically unable to perform his consulting services (the period in which the disability benefits are earned).

(15) Contingencies and Environmental Remediation

James Jones Litigation

On June 25, 1997,        As has been previously disclosed, the Company was party to a lawsuit filed by Nora Armenta in California Superior Court against us, James Jones Company, Mueller Co. and Tyco International (the Relator)"Armenta case") and a separate lawsuit filed in California Superior Court on behalf of the City of Banning, California and 42 other cities and water districts in California against the Company, James Jones Company and Mueller Co. (the "City of Banning case"). At a civil action inmediation session held with the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County (theon June 9-10, 2009, the parties to the Armenta case) againstcase and the City of Banning case agreed in principle to settle both cases. The agreement in principle was effective and binding only upon approval by the plaintiffs in the Armenta and City of Banning cases, and final approval of the settlement by the California Superior Court after a fairness hearing. An agreement in principle also was reached to settle the related insurance coverage casesWatts Industries, Inc. vs. Zurich American Insurance Company, et al., andZurich American Insurance Company vs. Watts Industries, Inc., et al., pending in California Superior Court; andZurich American Insurance Company vs. Watts Industries, Inc. and James Jones Company (James Jones), Mueller Co., Tyco International (U.S.), andpending in the Company.United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The Company formerly owned James Jones. The Relator filed under the qui tam provisionsettlement of the California state False Claims Act, Cal. Govt. Code § 12650 et seq. (California False Claims Act)insurance coverage cases was effective and generally alleged that James Jones and the other defendants violated this statute by delivering some “defective” or “non-conforming” waterworks parts to thirty-four municipal water systems in the State of California. The Relator filed a First Amended Complaint in November 1998 and a Second Amended Complaint in December 2000, which brought the total number of plaintiffs to 161. To date, 11binding upon approval of the named cities have intervenedsettlement of the underlying Armenta case and attemptsCity of Banning case as described above.

        The settlement agreement was approved by four other named cities to intervene have been denied.

In June 2002, the trial court excluded 47 cities from this December 2000 total of 161, but this exclusion was reversed by an August 30, 2006 California Court of Appeal ruling that is now final. This August 30, 2006, Court of Appeal ruling also reversed dismissals of Tyco International and Mueller Co. and this allowed the Relator to make a timely motion that would removeplaintiffs in both the Armenta Case litigation from Judge Lichtman’s court to another complex litigation judge’s court.

Oneand City of Banning cases and, at the fairness hearing held on November 5, 2009, the California Superior Court approved the settlement of the allegations inArmenta case and City of Banning case. There were no objectors to the Second Amended Complaint and the Complaints-in-Intervention is that purchased non-conforming James Jones waterworks parts may leach into public drinking water elevated amounts of lead that may create a public health risk because they were made out of ‘81 bronze alloy (UNS No. C8440) and contain more lead than the specified and advertised ‘85 bronze alloy (UNS No. C83600). This contention is basedsettlement. Based on the average differencecontemporaneous final settlement of about 2% lead content between ‘81 bronze (6%the underlying insurance coverage cases, the Company's contribution to 8% lead)the settlement was $15.3 million. As a result of the settlements, all lawsuits and ‘85 bronze (4%to 6% lead) andall claims were dismissed. In addition, separate from the assumption that this would mean increased consumable lead in public drinking water that could cause a public health concern. Thesettlement, the Company believes the evidence and discovery available to date indicates that this is not the case.paid its


89




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

In addition, ‘81 bronze is used extensively(15) Contingencies and Environmental Remediation (Continued)


outside counsel an additional $5.0 million for services rendered in municipal and home plumbing systems and is approved by municipal, local and national codes. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency also defines metal for pipe fittingsconnection with no more than 8% lead as “lead free” under Section 1417the above described litigation.

        As a result of the Federal Safe Drinking Watersettlement of the above described litigation, the Company recorded a non-cash, pre-tax gain in discontinued operations of approximately $9.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 to reduce previously recorded estimates of the loss and related fees to the amounts noted above.

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Investigation

        In July 2009, the Company received information that employees of CWV, at that time an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in China, made payments to employees of state-owned agencies. Such payments may violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In The Company is conducting an investigation utilizing outside counsel and voluntarily disclosed this case,matter to the Relator seeks three times an unspecified amount of actual damages and alleges that the municipalities have suffered hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. She also seeks civil penalties of $10,000 for each false claim and alleges that defendants are responsible for tens of thousands of false claims. Finally, the Relator requests an award of costs of this action, including attorneys’ fees.

In December 1998, the Los AngelesUnited States Department of WaterJustice and Power (LADWP) intervened in this casethe Securities and filed a complaint.Exchange Commission. The Company settled with the city of Los Angeles, by far the most significant city, for $7,300,000 plus attorneys’ fees. Co-defendants contributed $2,000,000 toward this settlement.

In August 2003, an additional settlement payment was made for $13,000,000 ($11,000,000 from the Company and $2,000,000 from James Jones), which settled the claims of the three Phase I cities (Santa Monica, San Francisco and East Bay Municipal Utility District) chosen by the Relator as having the strongest claims to be tried first. This settlement payment included the Relator’s statutory share, and the claims of these three cities have been dismissed. In addition to this $13,000,000 payment, the Company is obligated to pay the Relator’s attorney’s fees.

After the Phase I settlement, the Court permitted the defendants to select five additional cities to serve as the plaintiffs in a second trial phase of the case. Contra Costa, Corona, Santa Ana, Santa Cruz and Vallejo were chosen. The Company and James Jones then reached an agreement to settle the claims of the City of Santa Ana for a total of $45,000, an amount which approximates Santa Ana’s purchases of James Jones products during the relevant period. The Santa Ana settlement was approved by the Court and then completed.

On June 22, 2005, the Court dismissed the claims of the remaining Phase II cities (Contra Costa, Corona, Santa Cruz and Vallejo). The Court ruled that the Relator and these cities were required to show that the cities had received out of spec parts which were related to specific invoices and that this showing had not been made. Although each city’s claim is unique, this ruling is significant for the claims of the remaining cities, and the Relator has appealed. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and the Company is unable tocannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

On September 15, 2004, the Relator’s attorneys filed a new common law fraud lawsuit in the California Superior Court for the City of Banning and forty-five other cities and water districts against James Jones, Watts and Mueller Co. based on the same transactions alleged in the Armenta case. About thirty-four of the plaintiffs inmatter at this new lawsuit are also plaintiffs in the Armenta case. On January 4, 2006, the Court denied much of the defendants’ demurrer, which had been filed on claim-splitting and statute of limitations grounds. Litigation is inherently uncertain, and the Company is unable to predict the outcome of this new lawsuit.

The Company has a reserve of approximately $26,000,000 with respect to the James Jones Litigation in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. The Company believes, on the basis of all available information, that this reserve is adequate to cover the probable and reasonably estimable losses resulting from the Armenta case and the insurance coverage litigation with Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich) discussed below. The Company is currently unable to make an estimate of the range of any additional losses.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

On February 14, 2001, after the Company’s insurers had denied coverage for the claims in the Armenta case,time or whether it filed a complaint for coverage against its insurers in the California Superior Court (the coverage case). James Jones filed a similar complaint, the cases were consolidated, and the trial court made summary adjudication rulings that Zurich must pay all reasonable defense costs incurred by the Company and James Jones in the Armenta case since April 23, 1998 as well as such defense costs in the future until the end of the Armenta case. In July 2004, the California Court of Appeal affirmed these rulings, and, on December 1, 2004, the California Supreme Court denied Zurich’s appeal of this decision. This denial permanently established Zurich’s obligation to pay Armenta defense costs for both the Company (approximately $16,600,000 plus future costs) and James Jones (which the Company estimates to be $17,000,000 plus future costs), and Zurich is currently making payments of incurred Armenta defense costs. However, as noted below, Zurich asserts that the defense costs paid by it are subject to reimbursement.

On November 22, 2002, the trial court made a summary adjudication ruling that Zurich must indemnify and pay the Company and James Jones for amounts paid to settle with the City of Los Angeles. Zurich’s attempt to obtain appellate review of this order was denied, but Zurich will still be able to appeal this order at the end of the coverage case. On August 6, 2004, the trial court made another summary adjudication ruling that Zurich must indemnify and pay us and James Jones for the $13,000,000 paid to settle the claims of the Phase I cities described above. Zurich’s attempt to obtain appellate review of this ruling was denied on December 3, 2004 by the California Court of Appeal, but Zurich will still be able to appeal this order at the end of the coverage case. Zurich has now made most of the payments required by these indemnity orders.

On February 8, 2006, Zurich filed a motion to set aside as void the November 22, 2002 and August 6, 2004 summary adjudication indemnity payment orders.  After this motion was denied, Zurich appealed and this appeal is not yet resolved. The Company is currently unable to predict the finality of these indemnity payment orders since Zurich can also appeal them at the end of the coverage case. The Company has recorded reimbursed indemnity settlement amounts (but not reimbursed defense costs) as a liability pending court resolution of the indemnification matter as it relates to Zurich.

Zurich has asserted that all amounts (which the Company estimates to be $51,000,000 for both defense costs and indemnity amounts paid for settlements) paid by it to the Company and James Jones are subject to reimbursement under Deductible Agreements related to the insurance policies between Zurich and Watts. If Zurich were to prevail on this argument, James Jones would have a possible indemnity claim against the Company for its exposure from the Armenta case. The Company believes the Armenta case should be viewed as one occurrence and the deductible amount should be $500,000 per occurrence.

These reimbursement claims are subject to arbitration under the Watts/Zurich Deductible Agreements. Zurich claims its reimbursement right for defense costs paid arises under six Deductible Agreements, and the Company contend that only two Deductible Agreements apply. The Company further contend that a final decision in California supports our position on the number of Deductible Agreements that should apply to defense costs. On January 31, 2006, the federal district court in Chicago, Illinois determined that there are disputes under all Deductible Agreements in effect during the period in which Zurich issued primary policies and that the arbitrator could decide which agreements would control reimbursement claims. The Company appealed this ruling. On October 20, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed that an arbitration panel could decide which deductible agreements between Zurich and the Company would control Zurich’s reimbursement claim for defense


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

costs paid in the James Jones case. As a result of this development, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $5,000,000 to discontinued operations in 2006.

Based on management’s assessment, the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of the James Jones Litigation will have a materialmaterially adverse effectimpact on its liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. While this assessment is based on all available information, litigation is inherently uncertain, the actual liability to us to resolve this litigation fully cannot be predicted with any certainty and there exists a reasonable possibility that the Company may ultimately incur losses in the James Jones Litigation in excess of the amount accrued. The Company intends to continue to contest vigorously all aspects of the James Jones Litigation.sold CWV in January 2010.

Environmental Remediation

The Company has been named as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to a limited number of identified contaminated sites. The levels of contamination vary significantly from site to site as do the related levels of remediation efforts. Environmental liabilities are recorded based on the most probable cost, if known, or on the estimated minimum cost of remediation. TheThe Company accrues estimated environmental liabilities based on assumptions, which are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties. Circumstances which can affect the reliability and precision of these estimates include identification of additional sites, environmental regulations, level of cleanup required, technologies available, number and financial condition of other contributors to remediation and the time period over which remediation may occur. The Company recognizes changes in estimates as new remediation requirements are defined or as new information becomes available. At December 31, 2006, the Company has a reserve of approximately $1,400,000 (environmental accrual), which it estimates will likely be paid for environmental remediation liabilities over the next five to ten years.

        Based on the facts currently known to it, the Company, it does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, financial condition or results of operations. Some of its environmental matters are inherently uncertain and there exists a possibility that itwe may ultimately incur losses from these matters in excess of the amount accrued. However, the Company cannot currently estimate the amount of any such additional losses.

Asbestos Litigation

The Company is defending approximately 104 cases105 lawsuits in different jurisdictions, with the greatest number filed primarily, but not exclusively, in Mississippi and New JerseyCalifornia state courts, alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos. These filingsThe complaints in these cases typically name multiplea large number of defendants and are filed on behalf of many plaintiffs. They do not identify any particular Watts products as a source of asbestos exposure. To date, the Company has been dismissed from eachobtained a dismissal in every case when the scheduledbefore it has reached trial date comes near or whenbecause discovery failshas failed to yield any evidence of substantial exposure to any of itsWatts products. Based on the facts currently known to it, the Company, it does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these claims will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Other Litigation

On or about March 26, 2003, a class action complaint was filed against the Company by North Carolina Hospitality Group, Inc. in the Circuit Court of Maryland, Prince George’s County. It alleges that certain commercial valve models contain a design defect that causes them to fail prematurely. On June 7,



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2004, the trial court issued an opinion and order that denied the plaintiff’s request for class certification. This ruling was appealed at the end of 2004, and on January 17, 2006, this ruling was affirmed by the Maryland Court of Special Appeals. A release has been obtained from the plaintiff and this matter has now been successfully concluded.

(15) Contingencies and Environmental Remediation (Continued)

Other Litigation

Other lawsuits and proceedings or claims, arising from the ordinary course of operations, are also pending or threatened against the Company.us. Based on the facts currently known to it, the Company, it does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these other litigation matters will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

(16) Financial Instruments

Fair Value

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities,short-term investments, trade receivables and trade payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.

The fair value of the Company’sCompany's 4.87% senior notes due 2010, 5.47% senior notes due 2013 and 5.85% senior notes due 2016 is based on quoted market prices.prices of similar notes (level 2). The fair value of the Company’sCompany's variable rate debt approximates its carrying value. The carrying amount and the estimated fair market value of the Company’sCompany's long-term debt, including the current portion, are as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Carrying amount

 

$

449,219

 

$

306,985

 

Estimated fair value

 

$

447,544

 

$

306,485

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Carrying amount

 $354.9 $414.3 

Estimated fair value

 $360.9 $339.4 

Derivative Instruments

The Company usesmeasures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including auction rate securities, foreign currency derivatives, deferred compensation plan assets and related liability, and metal derivatives. The fair value of these certain financial assets and liabilities was determined using the following inputs at December 31, 2009:

 
 Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using: 
 
  
 Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical Assets
 Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
 
 
 Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) 
 
 (in millions)
 

Assets

             

Trading securities(1)

 $6.5 $ $ $6.5 

Plan asset for deferred compensation(2)

  3.5  3.5     
          

Total assets

 $10.0 $3.5 $ $6.5 
          

Liabilities

             

Foreign currency derivatives(3)

 $0.9 $ $0.9 $ 

Plan liability for deferred compensation(4)

  3.5  3.5     
          

Total liabilities

 $4.4 $3.5 $0.9 $ 
          

(1)
Included in short-term investment securities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

(2)
Included in other, net on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

(3)
Included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

(4)
Included in other noncurrent liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

        The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009.

 
  
  
 Total realized and
unrealized gains
(losses) included in:
  
 
 
 Balance
December 31,
2008
 Purchases,
sales,
settlements, net
 Earnings Comprehensive
income
 Balance
December 31,
2009
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Trading securities

 $8.3 $(1.7)$(0.1)$ $6.5 

        Trading securities comprise auction rate securities and rights issued by UBS. The Company holds a variety of interest bearing auction rate securities, or ARS, including $4.7 million in municipal bonds and $0.7 million in student loans at December 31, 2009. These ARS investments are intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at predetermined calendar intervals, allowing investors to either roll over their holdings or sell their interests at par. The uncertainties in the credit markets have affected all of the Company's holdings in ARS investments, and auctions for the Company's investments in these securities have failed on their respective auction dates. Consequently, the investments are not currently liquid and the Company will not be able to access these funds until a future auction of these investments is successful or a buyer is found outside of the auction process. Maturity dates for these ARS investments range from 2027 to 2036.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company elected to participate in a settlement offer from UBS for all of the outstanding ARS investments. Under the terms of the settlement offer, the Company was issued rights by UBS entitling the holder to require UBS to purchase the underlying ARS at par value during the period from June 30, 2010, through July 2, 2012. The rights, valued at $1.1 million at December 31, 2009, also entitle UBS to purchase or find a buyer for the ARS at any time at par value.

        While the Company continues to earn interest on its ARS investments, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not currently have a readily determinable market value.

        The Company used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of its investment in ARS and investments in UBS rights as of December 31, 2009. The assumptions used in preparing the discounted cash flow model include estimates for interest rates, credit quality of the ARS issuer, timing and amount of cash flows, government guarantees related to student loans and the expected holding periods of the ARS. Based on this assessment of fair value, the Company recorded income of approximately $0.4 million to other income in the consolidated statement of operations for its investment in ARS in 2009. To determine the fair value of the rights issued by UBS in connection with the settlement, the Company used a discounted cash flow model for the period up to the first date which the Company can exercise the rights. Based on this assessment of fair value, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $0.5 million to other expense in 2009.

        The Company used financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk, including foreign currency and commodity pricing exposures, which exist as part of its ongoing business operations. The



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)


use of derivatives exposes the Company to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance and to market risk related to changes in currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The Company manages its exposure to counterparty credit risk through diversification of counterparties. The Company's counterparties in derivative transactions are substantial commercial banks with significant experience using such derivative instruments. The impact of market risk on the fair value and cash flows of the Company's derivative instruments is monitored and the Company restricts the use of derivative financial instruments to hedging activities. The Company does not enter into contracts for trading purposes nor does the Company enter into any contracts for speculative purposes. The use of derivative instruments is approved by senior management under written guidelines.

        The Company has exposure to a number of foreign currency rates, including the Canadian Dollar, the Euro, the Chinese Yuan and the British Pound. To manage this risk, the Company generally uses a layering methodology whereby at the end of any quarter, the Company has generally entered into forward exchange contracts which hedge approximately 50% of the projected intercompany purchase transactions for the next twelve months. The Company primarily uses this strategy for the purchases between Canada and the U.S. The average volume of contracts can vary but generally approximates $10 to $12 million in open contracts at the end of any given quarter. At December 31, 2009, the Company had contracts for notional amounts aggregating approximately $9.0 million to buy various currencies. The Company accounts for the forward exchange contracts as an economic hedge to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations on certain anticipated intercompany purchase transactions that are expected to occur during the next twelve months and certain other foreign currency transactions.hedge. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in other income/expense.(income) expense in the consolidated statement of operations. These contracts do not subject the Company to significant market risk from exchange movement because they offset gains and losses on the related foreign currency denominated transactions. At December 31, 2006,

        In 2008, the Company entered into a series of copper swaps to fix the price per pound for copper from October 2008 through September 2009 for 1 million pounds to be delivered over 12 months for one customer. The Company determined that these copper swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting and accounted for these financial instruments as an economic hedge. Therefore, any changes in the fair value of the copper swaps were recorded immediately in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company does not enter into swap or forward contracts approximated $159,000. Atfor speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004,2009, the Company had no outstanding forward contracts to buy foreign currencies.swaps.

The Company occasionally uses commodity futures contracts to fixfollowing table discloses the pricefair values of derivative instruments on a certain portionthe Company's balance sheet as of certain raw materials used in the manufacturing process. There were no commodity contracts utilized for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009 and 2004.2008:

Liability Derivatives Balance Sheet Location Fair Value 
 
  
 2009 2008 
 
  
 (in millions)
 

Foreign currency derivatives

 Accrued expenses and other liabilities $0.9 $1.6 

        The following table discloses the impact of derivative instruments on the Company's operations for 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 
  
 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
 
 
 Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivatives
 
Derivatives 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
  
 (in millions)
 

Foreign currency derivatives

 Other income (expense) $(1.1)$0.1 $0.1 

Copper swap

 Other income (expense)  0.3  (1.6)  
          

Total

   $(0.8)$(1.5)$0.1 
          


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Leases(16) Financial Instruments (Continued)

Leases

The Company leases certain manufacturing facilities, sales offices, warehouses, and equipment. Generally, the leases carry renewal provisions and require the Company to pay maintenance costs. Future minimum lease payments under capital leases and non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 20062008 are as follows:

 

 

Capital Leases

 

Operating Leases

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2007

 

 

$

1,489

 

 

 

$

5,850

 

 

2008

 

 

1,727

 

 

 

4,920

 

 

2009

 

 

1,566

 

 

 

3,343

 

 

2010

 

 

1,566

 

 

 

2,264

 

 

2011

 

 

1,540

 

 

 

1,294

 

 

Thereafter

 

 

10,735

 

 

 

1,366

 

 

Total

 

 

$

18,623

 

 

 

$

19,037

 

 

Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 4.2% to 8.7%)

 

 

(3,305

)

 

 

 

 

 

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments

 

 

15,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less current installments of obligations under capital leases

 

 

(1,071

)

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations under capital leases, excluding installments

 

 

$

14,247

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 Capital Leases Operating Leases 
 
 (in millions)
 

2010

 $1.7 $7.8 

2011

  1.7  5.5 

2012

  1.6  4.4 

2013

  1.6  3.6 

2014

  1.5  2.7 

Thereafter

  7.9  5.0 
      
 

Total

 $16.0 $29.0 
       

Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 4.2% to 8.7%)

  (2.4)   
       

Present value of net minimum capital lease payments

  13.6    

Less current installments of obligations under capital leases

  (1.3)   
       
 

Obligations under capital leases, excluding installments

 $12.3    
       

        Carrying amounts of assets under capital lease include:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

Carrying amounts of assets under capital lease include:

 

 

 

 

 

Buildings

 

 

$

18,286

 

 

Machinery and equipment

 

 

3,073

 

 

 

 

 

21,359

 

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(2,875

)

 

 

 

 

$

18,484

 

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 
 
 (in millions)
 

Buildings

 $18.2 $17.7 

Machinery and equipment

  6.5  7.8 
      

  24.7  25.5 

Less accumulated depreciation

  (3.9) (4.3)
      

 $20.8 $21.2 
      

(17) Segment Information

Under the criteria set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the        The Company operates in three geographic segments: North America, Europe, and China. Each of these segments sell similar products, is managed separately and has separate financial results that are reviewed by the Company’sCompany's chief operating decision-maker. All intercompany sales transactions have been eliminated. Sales by region are based upon location of the entity recording the sale. The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2).



Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(17) Segment Information (Continued)

The following is a summary of the Company’sCompany's significant accounts and balances by segment, reconciled to its consolidated totals:

 

 

North
America

 

Europe

 

China

 

Corporate(*)

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

As of or for the year ended December 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

821,276

 

$

367,522

 

$

41,979

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

1,230,777

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

98,507

 

49,976

 

7,155

 

 

(25,151

)

 

 

130,487

 

 

Identifiable assets

 

1,046,782

 

493,413

 

120,655

 

 

 

 

 

1,660,850

 

 

Long-lived assets

 

99,652

 

78,390

 

28,118

 

 

 

 

 

206,160

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

14,550

 

27,467

 

2,631

 

 

 

 

 

44,648

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

17,055

 

12,964

 

5,272

 

 

 

 

 

35,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of or for the year ended December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

629,937

 

$

266,346

 

$

28,063

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

924,346

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

79,067

 

31,528

 

3,533

 

 

(19,573

)

 

 

94,555

 

 

Identifiable assets

 

717,424

 

288,783

 

94,763

 

 

 

 

 

1,100,970

 

 

Long-lived assets

 

92,904

 

45,674

 

26,421

 

 

 

 

 

164,999

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

9,502

 

6,082

 

3,006

 

 

 

 

 

18,590

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

13,050

 

8,888

 

4,180

 

 

 

 

 

26,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of or for the year ended December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

545,139

 

$

253,234

 

$

26,185

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

824,558

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

68,558

 

31,597

 

1,857

 

 

(18,412

)

 

 

83,600

 

 

Identifiable assets

 

537,898

 

303,981

 

80,801

 

 

 

 

 

922,680

 

 

Long-lived assets

 

72,019

 

52,276

 

26,394

 

 

 

 

 

150,689

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

8,029

 

6,374

 

6,596

 

 

 

 

 

20,999

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

14,961

 

8,870

 

4,220

 

 

 

 

 

28,051

 

 

 
 December 31, 
 
 2009 2008 2007 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net Sales

          
 

North America

 $738.5 $866.2 $871.0 
 

Europe

  466.5  532.0  439.8 
 

China

  20.9  33.2  45.5 
        
  

Consolidated net sales

 $1,225.9 $1,431.4 $1,356.3 
        

Operating income (loss)

          
 

North America

 $78.6 $67.8 $93.3 
 

Europe

  51.0  65.7  53.2 
 

China

  (6.6) (7.7) 6.6 
        
  

Subtotal reportable segments

  123.0  125.8  153.1 
 

Corporate (*)

  (30.8) (27.2) (29.1)
        
  

Consolidated operating income

  92.2  98.6  124.0 
  

Interest income

  0.9  5.1  14.5 
  

Interest expense

  (22.0) (26.2) (27.1)
  

Other

  1.2  (9.5) (2.3)
        

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $72.3 $68.0 $109.1 
        

Identifiable Assets

          
 

North America

 $804.7 $810.1 $1,055.6 
 

Europe

  686.0  698.3  504.3 
 

China

  85.4  99.0  109.2 
 

Discontinued operations

  15.3  52.7  60.2 
        
  

Consolidated identifiable assets

 $1,591.4 $1,660.1 $1,729.3 
        

Long-Lived Assets

          
 

North America

 $81.5 $92.3 $100.2 
 

Europe

  108.5  106.0  84.0 
 

China

  16.5  32.7  31.7 
        
  

Consolidated long-lived assets

 $206.5 $231.0 $215.9 
        

Capital Expenditures

          
 

North America

 $9.3 $8.3 $13.9 
 

Europe

  14.4  13.5  12.1 
 

China

  0.5  4.4  10.9 
        
  

Consolidated capital expenditures

 $24.2 $26.2 $36.9 
        

Depreciation and Amortization

          
 

North America

 $17.9 $18.7 $17.8 
 

Europe

  23.1  20.4  14.3 
 

China

  5.8  4.6  5.2 
        
  

Consolidated depreciation and amortization

 $46.8 $43.7 $37.3 
        

*
Corporate expenses are primarily for compensation expense, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, professional fees, including legal and audit expenses, shareholder services and benefit administration costs. These costs are not allocated to the geographic segments as they are viewed as corporate functions that support all activities.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(17) Segment Information (Continued)

The North America segment consists of U.S. net sales of $762,692,000,  $582,279,000$672.6 million, $798.1 million and $507,061,000$805.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively. The North American segment also consists of U.S. long-lived assets of $93,060,000, $86,099,000$74.8 million, $86.6 million and $67,032,000$92.7 million as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, respectively.


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Intersegment sales for the year ended December 31, 20062009 for North America, Europe and China were $6,880,000, $2,987,000$3.6 million, $5.8 million and $82,343,000,$110.4 million, respectively. Intersegment sales for the year ended December 31, 20052008 for North America, Europe and China were $4,847,000, $5,279,000$6.4 million, $6.4 million and $48,770,000,$133.1 million, respectively. Intersegment sales for the year ended December 31, 20042007 for North America, Europe and China were $6,040,000, $6,834,000$6.6 million, $6.0 million and $27,030,000,$137.1 million, respectively.

(18) Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

 

 

First
Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Third
Quarter

 

Fourth
Quarter

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share information)

 

Year ended December 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

274,950

 

$

300,175

 

$

325,137

 

$

330,515

 

Gross profit

 

95,818

 

106,359

 

111,919

 

110,922

 

Income from continuing operations

 

15,087

 

22,543

 

21,324

 

18,139

 

Net income

 

14,963

 

22,446

 

18,187

 

18,140

 

Per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

0.46

 

0.69

 

0.65

 

0.52

 

Net income

 

0.46

 

0.69

 

0.56

 

0.52

 

Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

0.46

 

0.68

 

0.65

 

0.51

 

Net income

 

0.46

 

0.68

 

0.55

 

0.51

 

Dividends per common share

 

0.09

 

0.09

 

0.09

 

0.09

 

Year ended December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

219,027

 

$

228,183

 

$

232,729

 

$

244,407

 

Gross profit

 

77,378

 

81,183

 

79,813

 

86,328

 

Income from continuing operations

 

12,397

 

13,988

 

13,439

 

15,196

 

Net income

 

12,358

 

13,913

 

13,368

 

14,960

 

Per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

0.38

 

0.43

 

0.41

 

0.47

 

Net income

 

0.38

 

0.43

 

0.41

 

0.46

 

Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

0.37

 

0.42

 

0.41

 

0.46

 

Net income

 

0.37

 

0.42

 

0.40

 

0.45

 

Dividends per common share

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

0.08

 

 
 First
Quarter
 Second
Quarter
 Third
Quarter
 Fourth
Quarter
 
 
 (in millions, except per share information)
 

Year ended December 31, 2009

             

Net sales

 $290.7 $308.2 $303.8 $323.2 

Gross profit

  97.0  109.2  109.4  119.5 

Income from continuing operations

  4.1  15.2  11.6  10.1 

Net income (loss)

  3.4  (3.6) 3.4  14.2 

Per common share:

             

Basic

             
 

Income from continuing operations

  0.11  0.41  0.31  0.27 
 

Net income (loss)

  0.09  (0.10) 0.09  0.38 

Diluted

             
 

Income from continuing operations

  0.11  0.41  0.31  0.27 
 

Net income (loss)

  0.09  (0.10) 0.09  0.38 

Dividends per common share

  0.11  0.11  0.11  0.11 

Year ended December 31, 2008

             

Net sales

 $337.0 $380.8 $372.0 $341.6 

Gross profit

  112.3  130.4  122.4  116.7 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  13.0  19.6  16.3  (3.7)

Net income (loss)

  13.7  19.8  16.7  (3.6)

Per common share:

             

Basic

             
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  0.35  0.54  0.44  (0.10)
 

Net income (loss)

  0.37  0.54  0.46  (0.10)

Diluted

             
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  0.35  0.53  0.44  (0.10)
 

Net income (loss)

  0.37  0.54  0.45  (0.10)

Dividends per common share

  0.11  0.11  0.11  0.11 

(19) Related Party Transactions

On August 21, 2006, the Company divested its 20% interest in www.plumbworld.co.uk Limited (Plumbworld), a variable interest entity. The Company had a nominal investment of approximately $500 in Plumbworld and maintained a loan receivable that was paid in full, at which time it relinquished its shares in Plumbworld.

In 2004, an agreement was executed with a relocation firm to purchase and sell the home of the Company’s chief executive officer, who is also a member of the Company’s board of directors. The relocation firm purchased the home from the Company’s chief executive officer, on the Company’s behalf,


Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

at a price based on fair market appraisals obtained by the Company. Accordingly, the Company charged income from continuing operations for approximately $285,000 representing the difference between the original appraised value of the home and the final sale price to the third party.

The Company leases the land and buildings occupied by its 60% Chinese joint venture Tianjin Tanggu Watts Valve Co. Ltd. (TWT) from the joint venture partner venture in Tianjin China. The lease is classified as an operating lease. Total rental expense for 2006 approximated $284,000. Total rental expense for 2005 and 2004 approximated $275,000 each year. During 2006, the local Chinese government  informed the Company that the property owned by TWT would be taken over by eminent domain by December 31, 2007. The Company has therefore established a plan to relocate and rationalize those operations. The Chinese government is expected to partially compensate the Company for the move, but the exact reimbursement amount is yet to be determined (see note 4).

(20) Subsequent Events

In        On February 2007,9, 2010, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of teneleven cents ($0.10)0.11) per share on each outstanding share of Class A common stockCommon Stock and Class B common stock. This is an increase of $0.01 per share compared to the dividend paid for the comparable period last year.Common Stock.


97




Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(Amounts in thousands)millions)

For the Three Years Ended December 31:

 

 

Balance At
Beginning of
Period

 

Additions
Charged To
Expense

 

Additions
Charged To
Other Accounts

 

Deductions

 

Balance At
End of
Period

 

Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

$

7,772

 

 

 

2,100

 

 

 

337

 

 

 

(2,658

)

 

 

$

7,551

 

 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 

 

$

14,245

 

 

 

7,325

 

 

 

289

 

 

 

(5,660

)

 

 

$

16,199

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

$

7,551

 

 

 

3,914

 

 

 

341

 

 

 

(2,510

)

 

 

$

9,296

 

 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 

 

$

16,199

 

 

 

2,593

 

 

 

1,074

 

 

 

(2,262

)

 

 

$

17,604

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

$

9,296

 

 

 

3,481

 

 

 

297

 

 

 

(2,531

)

 

 

$

10,543

 

 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 

 

$

17,604

 

 

 

9,140

 

 

 

953

 

 

 

(7,150

)

 

 

$

20,547

 

 

 
 Balance At
Beginning of
Period
 Additions
Charged To
Expense
 Additions
Charged To
Other Accounts
 Deductions Balance At
End of
Period
 

Year Ended December 31, 2007

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $10.1  4.4  0.7  (1.9)$13.3 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 $20.5  9.1  2.2  (7.5)$24.3 

Year Ended December 31, 2008

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $13.3  5.1  0.4  (9.2)$9.6 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 $24.3  7.5  0.2  (6.0)$26.0 

Year Ended December 31, 2009

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $9.6  0.6  (0.6) (2.1)$7.5 

Allowance for excess and obsolete inventories

 $26.0  7.8  0.5  (8.6)$25.7 

98




EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.Description

3.1

Description

  3.1

Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (21)(14)

3.2

Amended and Restated By-Laws as amended (1)

9.1

The Amended and Restated George B. Horne Voting Trust Agreement—1997 dated as of September 14, 1999 (15)

10.1*

Supplemental Compensation Agreement effective as of September 1, 1996 between the Registrant and Timothy P. Horne (9), Amendment No. 1, dated July 25, 2000 (16), and Amendment No. 2 dated October 23, 2002 (3)

10.2*

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and certain directors and officers of the Registrant (22)(17)

10.3*

1996 Stock Option Plan, dated October 15, 1996 (10), and First Amendment dated February 28, 2003 (3)

10.4*

Watts Industries, Inc. Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees dated December 30, 1994, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1994 (8), Amendment No. 1 (9), Amendment No. 2 (9), Amendment No. 3 (9), Amendment No. 4 dated September 4, 1996 (12), Amendment No. 5 dated January 1, 1998 (15), Amendment No. 6 dated May 3, 1999 (15), and Amendment No. 7 dated June 7, 1999 (15)

10.5*

Watts Industries,Water Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan (amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1997) (3)2006) and First Amendment dated October 25, 2002 (3)effective as of January 1, 2008 (20)

10.610.5

Registration Rights Agreement dated July 25, 1986 (5)

10.7*10.6*

Executive Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended and restated (20)as of January 1, 2008 (8)

10.810.7

Amended and Restated Stock Restriction Agreement dated October 30, 1991 (2), and Amendment dated August 26, 1997 (12)

10.9*10.8*

Watts Industries, Inc. 1991 Non-Employee Directors’Directors' Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (6), and Amendment No. 1 (9)

10.10*10.9*

Watts Industries, Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Directors’Directors' Stock Option Plan (3)

10.1110.10*

Letter of Credit issued by Fleet National Bank (as successor to BankBoston, N.A.) forResignation Agreement dated July 8, 2009 between the benefit of Zurich-American Insurance Company dated June 25, 1999, as amended January 22, 2001 (17)Registrant and Josh C. Fu (11)

10.12*10.11

Non-Competition Agreement dated July 8, 2009 between Watts (Shanghai) Management Co., Ltd. And Josh C. Fu (11)

10.12*

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Management Stock Purchase Plan (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005), as amended and restated (20)(19)

10.13

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of June 19, 1996 by and among Mueller Co., Tyco Valves Limited, Watts Investment Company, Tyco International Ltd. and the Registrant (11)

10.14

Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2003 between the Registrant and the Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto relating to the Registrant’sRegistrant's $50,000,000 4.87% Senior Notes, Series A, due May 15, 2010 and $75,000,000 5.47% Senior Notes, Series B, due May 15, 2013 (7)

10.1510.14

Form of 4.87% Senior Note due May 15, 2010 (7)

10.1610.15

Form of 5.47% Senior Note due May 15, 2013 (7)

10.17*10.16*

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, (17)as amended (19)

10.18*10.17*

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements (1)

10.19*10.18*

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. Supplemental Employees Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated Effective May 4, 2004, (18)First Amendment effective March 1, 2005 and Second Amendment effective January 1, 2008 (20)

10.20*10.19*

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (19)(18)

10.21*10.20*

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (19)


10.22*10.21*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees under the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Incremental Vesting) (19)

10.23*10.22*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Employees under the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (19)(Cliff Vesting) (18)

10.24*10.23*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the Watts Water Technologies, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (19)(18)

10.2510.24

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, between the Registrant and the Purchasers named in Schedule A thereto relating to the Registrant’sRegistrant's $225,000,000 5.85% Senior Notes due April 30, 2016 (4)

10.2610.25

Form of 5.85% Senior Note due April 30, 2016 (4)

10.2710.26

Subsidiary Guaranty, dated as of April 27, 2006, in connection with the Registrant’sRegistrant's 5.85% Senior Notes due April 30, 2016 executed by the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, including the form of Joinder to Subsidiary Guaranty (4)


Exhibit No.Description

10.27

First Amendment, dated as of April 27, 2006, to Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2003 amongstamong the Registrant and the purchasers named therein (4)

10.2910.28

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 27, 2006, among the Registrant, certain subsidiaries of the Registrant as Borrowers, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and the other lenders referred to therein (4)

10.3010.29

Amended and Restated Guaranty, dated as of April 27, 2006, by the Registrant, the Subsidiaries of the Registrant set forth therein and Watts Industries Europe B.V., in favor of Bank of America, N.AN.A. (4)

1110.30*

Resignation Agreement dated December 1, 2009 between the Registrant and Gregory Michaud

10.31*

Severance Agreement dated February 16, 2009 between the Registrant and Douglas T. White (17)

11

Statement Regarding Computation of Earnings per Common Share (13)

21

Subsidiaries

23

Consent of KPMG LLP

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 20078, 2010 (File No. 001-11499).



(2)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 1991 (File No. 001-11499).



(3)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 001-11499).



(4)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2006 (File No. 001-11499).



(5)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Form S-1 (No. 33-6515) as part of the Second Amendment to such Form S-1 dated August 21, 1986.



(6)
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1992 (File No. 001-11499).



(7)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2003 (File No. 001-11499).



(8)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s AnnualRegistrant's Current Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 19958-K dated May 14, 2008 (File No. 001-11499).



(9)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1996 (File No. 001-11499).



(10)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Form S-8 (No. 333-32685) dated August 1, 1997.



(11)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s  CurrentRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 8-K dated September 4, 199610-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2009 (File No. 001- 11499)001-11499).



(12)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1997(File1997 (File No. 001- 11499)001-11499).



(13)
Incorporated by reference to notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2 of this Report.

(14)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s CurrentRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 8-K dated December 28,10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 (File No. 001-11499). The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or similar attachment to this agreement to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.



(15)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 001-11499).



(16)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2000 (File No. 001-11499).



(17)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20032008 (File No. 001-11499).



(18)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2004 (File No. 001-11499).

(19)   Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2004 (File No. 001-11499).

(20)

(19)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005 (File No. 001-11499).

(21)   Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 20051, 2007 (File No. 001-11499).

(22)

(20)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s QuarterlyRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-Q10-K for the quarteryear ended October 1, 2006December 31, 2007 (File No. 001-11499).



*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


101
QuickLinks

PART I

PART II
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations (Amounts in millions, except per share information)
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (Amounts in millions, except share information)
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Amounts in millions, except share information)
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Amounts in millions)
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (Amounts in millions)
EXHIBIT INDEX