QuickLinks-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 20072010

THE TORO COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

1-8649

41-0580470

Delaware

1-864941-0580470
(State of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number)

8111 Lyndale Avenue South
Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-1196
Telephone number: (952) 888-8801

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’sregistrant's principal executive offices)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Preferred Share Purchase Rights

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes ýxNo o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.      Yes o      No xý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.      Yes xý      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).      Yes ý      No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.      ýo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “accelerated"large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and large accelerated filer”"smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer        x        Accelerated filer        o        Non-accelerated filer        o

Large accelerated filer ýAccelerated filer oNon-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes o      No xý

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of the Common Stock on May 4, 2007,April 30, 2010, the last business day of the registrant’sregistrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $2.1$1.9 billion.

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 13, 200716, 2010 was 38,253,743.31,531,175.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant’sregistrant's Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders expected to be held March 11, 200815, 2011 are incorporated by reference into Part III.





THE TORO COMPANY
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS


Description
Page Number

PART I

ITEM 1.

Business


     3-10

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

   11-18

ITEM 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

        18

ITEM 2.

Properties

        19

ITEM 3.

Legal Proceedings

        19

ITEM 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

        19

Description

Page Number

PART I

ITEM 1.

Business

3

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

11

ITEM 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

17

ITEM 2.

Properties

18

ITEM 3.

Legal Proceedings

18

ITEM 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

19

Executive Officers of the Registrant

20

PART II

ITEM 5.

Market for Registrant’sRegistrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


21

The Toro Company Common Stock Comparative Performance Graph

22

ITEM 6.

Selected Financial Data

23

ITEM 7.

Management’s Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

23

   23-35

ITEM 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

36

   36-37

ITEM 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

38

Management’s   Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

38

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

39

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

40

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009

41

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

42

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

43

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

44

   44-61

ITEM 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

57

        62

ITEM 9A.

Controls and Procedures

58

        62

ITEM 9B.

Other Information

58

        62

PART III

ITEM 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

58


        62

ITEM 11.

Executive Compensation

58

        62

ITEM 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

59

        63

ITEM 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

59

        63

ITEM 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

59

        63

PART IV

ITEM 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

59


   63-67

Signatures

63

        68

2




PART I


ITEM 1.   BUSINESS
            BUSINESS

Introduction

The Toro Company was incorporated in Minnesota in 1935 as a successor to a business founded in 1914 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1983. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “company,” “Toro,” “we,” “us,”"company," "Toro," "we," "us," and “our”"our" refer to The Toro Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our executive offices are located at 8111 Lyndale Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55420-1196, telephone number (952) 888-8801. Our Internet address for corporate and investor information iswww.thetorocompany.com, which also contains links to our branded product sites. The information contained on our web sites or connected to our web sites is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report.

We design, manufacture, and market professional turf maintenance equipment and services, turf and micro irrigationagricultural micro-irrigation systems, landscaping equipment, and residential yard and snow removal products. We produced our first mower for golf course use in 1921 when we mounted five reel mowers on a Toro Tractor,tractor, and we introduced our first lawn mower for residential use in 1939.1935. We have continued to enhance our product lines ever since. We classify our operations into twothree reportable business segments: professionalProfessional, Residential, and residential. A thirdDistribution. Our distribution segment, called “other”which consists of our company-owned domestic company-owned distributorships, has been combined with our corporate functions,activities and Toro Credit Company, a wholly owned financing subsidiary.is shown as "Other." Net sales of our three reportable segments accounted for the following approximate percentages of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007:2010: Professional, 6864 percent; Residential, 3035 percent; and Other, 21 percent.

Our products are advertised and sold at the retail level under the primary trademarks of Toro®Toro®, Exmark®Exmark®, Irritrol®Irritrol®, Lawn-Boy®Hayter®, Hayter®Pope®, Pope®Lawn-Boy®, and Lawn Genie®Genie®, most of which are registered in the United States and/or in the principalprimary foreign countries where we market oursuch products. This report also contains trademarks, trade names, and service marks that are owned by other persons or entities, such as The Home Depot.

We emphasize quality and innovation in our products, customer service, manufacturing, and marketing. We strive to provide well-built, dependable products supported by an extensive service network. We have committed funding for engineering and research in order to improve existing products and develop new products. Through these efforts, we seek to be responsive to trends that may affect our target markets now and in the future. A significant portion of our revenue has historically been, and we expect it to continue to be, attributable to new and enhanced products. At the same time, we plan to pursue targeted acquisitions using a disciplined approach that adds value towhile considering our existing brands and product portfolio. Our mission is to be the leading worldwide provider of outdoor landscaping products, support services, and integrated systems that help customers preserve and beautify their outdoor landscapes with environmentally responsible solutions of customer-valued quality and innovation. Additional information on our next-generation initiative is included in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this report.

Products by Market

We strive to be a leader in adapting advanced technologies to products and services that provide solutions for landscapes, agricultural fields, turf care maintenance, and residential demands. The following is a summary of our products, by market, for the professional segment and our products for the residential segment:

ProfessionalProfessionalWe design professional turf and agricultural products and market them worldwide through a network of distributors and dealers as well as directly to government customers, rental companies, and rental companies.large retailers. Products are sold by distributors and dealers to professional users engaged in creating landscapes, irrigating turf and agricultural fields, and maintaining turf, such as golf courses, sports fields, municipal properties, and residential and commercial landscapes.

Landscape Contractor Market.Products for the landscape contractor market include zero-turn radius riding mowers, 21-inch heavy-duty walk behind mowers, mid-size walk behind mowers, andstand-on mowers, compact utility loaders.loaders, walk-behind trenchers, and stump grinders. These products are sold through distributors and dealers and are also available through rental centers to individuals and companies who maintain and create residential and commercial landscapes on behalf of property owners. We market products to landscape contractors under multiplethe Toro and Exmark brands. In fiscal 2007,2010, we introducedexpanded the Toro T2 T-Bar Hydro, a mid-size commercial walk-behind mower that features our easy-to-use T2 T-Bar steering controls and high performance Turboforce® cutting deck technology.GrandStand® series of stand-on mowers to include two new compact models for smaller properties. In fiscal 2007,2010, we also introduced the Toro Z Master® Z300 PROExmark Vantage® premium stand-on mower, featuring our UltraCut™ Series sub-compact zero-turn radius riding mowers, combining the productivity of a zero-turn radius rider4 cutting deck, versatile fold-up platform, and the accessibility of a walk-behind mower, and the Exmark Quest®fatigue-reducing suspension., a zero-turn radius riding mower that delivers commercial grade features to homeowners seeking professional results.

Our compact utility loaders are cornerstone products for the Toro Sitework Systems product line. These productsline, which are designed to improve efficiency in the creation of landscapes. We offer over 35 attachments for our compact utility loaders, including trenchers, augers, vibratoryvibra-tory plows, and backhoes. In fiscal 2010, we acquired a line of stump grinders, wood chippers, and log splitters to broaden and strengthen our equipment solutions line for the rental and landscape markets. In fiscal 2010, we introduced the STX Stump Grinder, featuring a stable yet maneuverable track drive design and the same easy-to-use control system as the Toro Dingo® TX.


Sports Fields and Grounds Market.Products for the sports fields and grounds market include riding rotary units with cutting widths ranging from 21 inches to 16 feet,mowers and attachments, aerators, attachments, and debris management products, which include



versatile debris vacuums, blowers, and sweepers. Other products include multipurpose vehicles, such as the Workman®Toro Workman®, that can be used for turf maintenance, towing, and industrial hauling. These products are sold through distributors, who then sell to owners and/or managers of sports fields, municipalgovernmental properties, and residential and commercial landscapes. In fiscal 2007,2010, we introduced the Groundsmaster® 7200/7210,Groundsmaster® 4300-D, featuring our patented Contour Plus™ cutting units that virtually eliminate scalping, the Toro Polar Trac™ SystemCrossTrax® all-wheel drive traction system, and full-length striping rear rollers. In fiscal 2010, we also introduced the Groundsmaster® 4100-D, featuring an out-front mower deck and bi-directional four-wheel drive traction system that transforms this zero-turn radiusassures full-time four-wheel drive in both forward and reverse on hilly terrain.

Golf Course Market.   Products for the golf course market include large reel and rotary mower intoriding products for fairway, rough and trim cutting; riding and walking mowers for putting greens and specialty areas; turf sprayer equipment; utility vehicles; aeration equipment; and bunker maintenance equipment. We also manufacture and market underground irrigation systems, including sprinkler heads, controllers, turf sensors, and electric, battery-operated, and hydraulic valves. Our golf course irrigation systems are designed to use computerized management systems and a snow removal machinevariety of other technologies to help customers manage their consumption of water. Our 835S/855S Series golf sprinklers are equipped with a unique TruJectory™ feature that provides enhanced water distribution control as well as uniformity, nozzle flexibility, and system efficiency. Our Network VP® Satellite combines modular flexibility, ease of use, and increased control in a single controller with programming to the individual station level that supports station-based flow management. Our Turf Guard® wireless soil monitoring systems are designed to measure soil moisture, salinity, and temperature through buried wireless sensors that communicate through an Internet server for processing and presentation to a user through the web. In fiscal 2010, we introduced the ProPass™ 200 series broadcast-style topdresser and the Toro Quick Attachment SystemMH-400 material handler, both of which feature available wireless controllers that enables attachment changes withoutallow for real-time adjustments. In fiscal 2010, we also introduced the use of tools.Lynx™ central control system that gathers golf course management information from multiple irrigation system components, including weather stations, pump stations, electrical systems, field controllers, and soil sensors.

Residential/Commercial Irrigation Market.Turf irrigation products we marketmarketed under multiplethe Toro and Irritrol brands include rotors, sprinkler heads,bodies and nozzles, plastic and brass valves, drip tubing and plastic valves,subsurface irrigation, and electric and hydraulic control devices designed to be used in residential and commercial turf irrigation systems. These products are professionally installed as new systems and can also be used to replace or retrofit existing systems. Most of the product line is designed for underground irrigation systems. Electric and hydraulic controllers activate valves and sprinkler headsbodies and nozzles in a typical irrigation system. We also offer wired and wireless rain and freeze switches on somea number of products in an effort to help conserve water usage. Our IntelliSense™ and Rain Master™Master® controllers self-adjust their watering schedules based on current environmentenvironmental conditions. In fiscal 2007,2010, we introduced the TDCrugged T7 Rotor, designed to withstand the conditions of harsh commercial landscapes. In fiscal 2010, we also introduced the new Precision™ Series Advanced Two Wire Decoder Control,Rotating Nozzles, featuring an innovative two-wire communication path to buried decoders that eliminatesa high-torque gear-drive design for greater debris resistance.

   Our retail irrigation products are marketed under the costs associated with traditional wire bundlesToro and enables easyLawn Genie brand names. These products are designed for homeowner installation and expansion.

Golf Course Market.Products for the golf course market include large reel and rotary riding products for fairway, rough and trim cutting; riding and walking mowers for putting greens and specialty areas; turf sprayer equipment; utility vehicles; aeration equipment; and bunker maintenance equipment. We also manufacture and market underground irrigation systems, including sprinkler heads, valves, timers, and controllers that activate electric, battery-operated, or hydraulic valves.drip irrigation systems. Our professional irrigation systems are designed to use computerized management systems and a variety of technologies to help customers manage their consumption of water. Our 835S/855S Series golf sprinklers are equippedECXTRA™ sprinkler timers can be used with a unique TruJectory™ feature that provides enhanced water distribution control as well as uniformity, nozzle flexibility,home computer and system efficiency. Our Network VP™ Satellite also provides an upgrade path to customers with existing controllers. In late fiscal 2006, we introducedour Scheduling Advisor™ recommends the Reelmaster® 5010 Series of reel mowers for golf course fairways, featuring Dual Precision Adjustment cutting unitsproper watering schedule based on the local weather, plant type, and the CrossTrax™ all-wheel drive system. In fiscal 2007, we introduced the Toro DT Series of golf rotors, featuring dual trajectory and full- and part-circle adjustments.sprinkler.

Micro-Irrigation Market.Products for the micro-irrigation market include emission devicesproducts that regulate the flow of water for drip irrigation, including Aqua-TraXX®Aqua-Traxx® PBX drip tape, patented Aqua-TraXX®Aqua-Traxx® PC (pressure-compensating), drip tape, Blue Stripe®Stripe® polyethylene tubing, and Drip In®BlueLine® drip line, and NGE® emitters, all used in agriculture, mining, and landscape applications. In addition to these core products, we offer a full complement of control devices and connection options to complete the system. These products are sold primarily through dealers and distributors who then sell to end usersend-users for use primarily in vegetable fields, fruit and nut orchards, vineyards, landscapes, and landscapes. We also offer a product life-cycle management program that includes an industry-first recycling service and permanent identification for ease of installation.mines. In fiscal 2007,2010, we introduced the Aqua-Traxx® Ultra Low Flow Premium Drip Tapenew BlueLine Classic® emitter, a non-pressure compensating emitter that reducesprovides tree and vine growers exceptional performance when the amountterrain does not require the use of water applieda pressure compensating emitter. We also introduced a variety of accessories to a field, preventing infiltrationhelp growers complete their Toro micro-irrigation system, such as Pro-Loc fittings, PVC Flex hose, Layflat hose, and runoff for growers on heavy or tight soils.our new SD disc filters.

ResidentialResidentialWe market our residential products to homeowners through a variety of distribution channels, including outdoor power equipment dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, mass retailers, and over the Internet, mainly through Internet retailers.Internet. These products are sold mainly in North America, Europe, and Australia, with the exception of snow removal products whichthat are sold primarily in North America and Europe. We also license our trade name to other manufacturers and retailers on certain products as a means of expanding our brand presence.

Walk Power Mower Products.We manufacture and market numerous walk power mower models under multiple brands, includingour Toro and Lawn-Boy brand names, as well as the Pope brand in Australia and the Hayter brand in the United Kingdom. Models differ as to cutting width, type of starter mechanism, ability to mulch, bag or sidemethod of grass clipping discharge, grass clippings, cast aluminum or steel decks,deck type, operational controls, and power sources, and



are either self-propelled or push mowers. Toro brand lawn mowers are backed by our “Guaranteed To Start” program. We also offer a line of rear roller walk power mowers, a design that provides a striped finish, for the United Kingdom market. In fiscal 2007,2010, we introduced an enhanced line of Toro Super Recycler® walk power mowers,the all new e-Cycler™ cordless electric mower, featuring the “Quick Connect” bagging systemsame reliability and the “Quick Change” mulching system that converts from bagging to mulching effortlessly with no loose parts. In addition, these new innovative walk powerperformance of our gas-powered Recycler® mowers feature the “Quick Wash” wash-out port for easy cleaning and two of the models feature the Key-Lectric® electric start that starts the mower at the turn of a key. In fiscal 2007, we also introduced the Toro Multicycler line of walk power mowers to the European market, featuring our Recycle-on-Demand mulching technology, and the Lawn-Boy Insight™ Platinum Series of walk-behind mowers, featuring fully enclosed transmissions, cast aluminum decks, and a five-year warranty.in an emissions-free platform.


Riding Products.We manufacture and market riding products under multiple brands.the Toro brand name worldwide and under the Hayter brand name in the United Kingdom. We also manufacture riding mower products plusand attachments for a third party under a private label agreement. Riding products primarily consist of zero-turn radius mowers that save homeowners time by using superior maneuverability to cut around obstacles more quickly and tractors include aeasily than tractor technology. We also sell lawn and garden tractor models, as well as rear engine and direct-collect riding mowermowers manufactured and sold in the European market; lawn tractor models; and garden tractor models.market. Many models are available with a variety of engines, decks, transmissions, and accessories. Recycler cutting decks are available on some models. Models can be equipped with automatic or hydrostatic transmissions. In recent years, we introduced a new line of riding products, the TimeCutter® zero-turning radius riding mowers. In fiscal 2007, we introduced the redesigned Toro TimeCutter® Z Series of zero-turning radius riding mowers, featuring larger engines and deck options and other enhancements designed to further reduce mowing time for homeowners.

Home Solutions Products.We design and market home solutions products under multiple brands,the Toro and Pope brand names, including electric and battery operated flexible line grass trimmers, electric blowers,blower-vacuums, electric blower-vacuums,blowers, and electric snow throwers. In fiscal 2007, we introduced three new electric blower-vacuum models, featuring a more powerful air force and an improved flow rate.

Retail Irrigation Products.We design and market underground retail irrigation products under multiple brands. In Australia, we also design and market underground and hose-end retail irrigation products under the Pope brand name. These products are designed for homeowner installationIn fiscal 2010, we introduced the 1800 Power Curve® electric snow thrower, featuring redesigned handles and include sprinkler heads, valves,chute controls that enhance operator comfort and electronic and mechanical timers. Our ECXTRA™ sprinkler timers can be used with a home computer, and our Scheduling Advisor™ recommends the proper watering schedule based on the local weather, plant type, and sprinkler. We also design and market drip irrigation systems for residential landscapes and gardens.convenience.

Gas Snow Removal Products.We manufacture and market a range of gas-powered single-stage and two-stage snow thrower models under multiple brands.models. Single-stage snow throwers are walk behind units with lightweight two- and four-cycle gasoline engines. Most single-stage snow thrower models include Power Curve®Curve® snow thrower technology.technology and some feature our Quick Shoot™ control system that enable operators to quickly change snow throwing direction. Our largeinnovative pivoting scraper also keeps the rotor in constant contact with the pavement. Our two-stage snow throwers are generally designed for relatively large areas of deep, heavy snow falls and use two- and four-cycle engines. Our two-stage snow throwers include a line of innovative models featuring the Power Max®Max® auger system for enhanced performance and the Quick Stick®Stick® chute control technology. In early fiscal 2007,2010, we introduced the Power Clear™a new line of snow throwers, featuring redesigned single-stage snow thrower to the North American and European markets, featuring our Quick Shoot™ control system that enables operators to quickly change snow throwing direction, and an innovative pivoting scraper that keeps the rotor in constant contact with the pavement.two-stage models for residential customers.

Financial Information Aboutabout Foreign Operations
and Business Segments

We manufacture our products in the United States, Mexico, Australia, Italy, and the United Kingdom for sale throughout the world and maintain sales offices in the United States, Belgium, the United Kingdom, France, Australia, Singapore, Japan, China, Italy, and Switzerland.Korea. New product development is pursued primarily in the United States. Our net sales outside the United States were 29.031.8 percent, 27.032.0 percent, and 24.832.4 percent of total consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively.

A portion of our cash flow is derived from sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies. To reduce the uncertainty of foreign currency exchange rate movements on these sales and purchase commitments, we enter into foreign currency exchange contracts for select transactions. For additional information regarding our foreign currency exchange contracts, see Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk”Risk" of this report. For additional financial information regarding our foreign operations and each of our three reportable business segments, see Note 1112 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, in the section entitled “Segment"Segment Data," included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”Data" of this report.

Engineering and Research

We are committed to an ongoing engineering program dedicated to developing innovative new products and improvements in the quality and performance of existing products. However, a focus on innovation also carries certain risks that new technology could be slow to be accepted or not accepted by the marketplace. We attempt to mitigate these risks through our focus on and commitment to understanding our customers' needs and requirements. We have invested more time upfront with customers, using "Voice of the Customer" tools, to help us develop innovative products that we expect to meet or exceed customer expectations. We use Design for Manufacturing and Assembly ("DFM/A") tools to ensure early manufacturing involvement in new product designs to reduce production costs. DFM/A focuses on reducing the number of parts required to assemble new products, as well as designing products to move more efficiently through the manufacturing process. We are also making improvements to our new product development system as part of our continuing focus on Lean methods to shorten development time, reduce costs, and improve quality.

   Our engineering expenses are primarily incurred in connection with the development of new products that may have additional applications or represent extensions of existing product lines, improvements to existing products, and cost reduction efforts. Our expenditures for engineering and research were $53.3 million (3.2 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2010, $52.7 million (3.5 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2009, and $63.0 million (3.4 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2008.

Manufacturing and Production

In some areas of our business we are primarily an assembler, while in others we serve as a fully integrated manufacturer.manufacturer, while in others we are primarily an assembler. We have strategically identified specific core manufacturing competencies for vertical integration and have chosen outside vendors to provide other services. We design component parts in cooperation with our vendors, contract with them for the development of tooling, and


then enter into agreements with these vendors to purchase component parts manufactured using the tooling. In addition, our vendors regularly test new technologies to be applied to the design and production of component parts. Manufacturing operations include robotic and computer-automated equipment to speed production, reduce costs, and improve the quality, fit, and finish of products. Operations are also designed to be flexible enough to accommodate product design changes requiredthat are necessary to respond to market demand.

In order to utilize our manufacturing facilities and technology more effectively, we pursue continuous improvements in our manufacturing processes with the use of Lean methods whichthat are intended to streamline work and eliminate waste. We also have some flexible assembly lines that can handle a wide product mix and deliver products to meet customer demand. Additionally, we spend considerable effort to reduce manufacturing costs through Lean methods and process improvement, product and platform design, application of advanced technology,technologies, enhanced environmental management systems, SKU consolidation, safety improvements, and betterimproved supply-chain management. We also manufacture products sold under a private label agreement to a


third party on a competitive basis, and we have agreements with other third party manufacturers to manufacture products on our behalf.

Our professional products are manufactured throughout the year. Our residential lawn and garden products are also generally manufactured throughout the year. However, our residential snow removal equipment products are generally manufactured in the summer and fall months.months but may be extended into the winter months depending upon demand. Our products are tested in conditions and locations similar to those in which they are used. We use computer-aided design and manufacturing systems to shorten the time between initial concept and final production. DFM/A principles are used throughout the product development process to optimize product quality and cost.

Our production levels and inventory management goals are based on estimates of retail demand for our products, taking into account production capacity, timing of shipments, and field inventory levels. In fiscal 2007,2010, we continued to roll-out a pull-based production system at some of our manufacturing facilities to better synchronizealign the production of our products to meet customer demand at just the right time. Along with improved service levels for our participating suppliers, distributors, and distributors, the programdealers, this system has resulted in inventory reductions through thefor us and throughout our distribution system.

We periodically shut down production at our manufacturing facilities in order to allow for maintenance, rearrangement, and capital equipment installation, at our manufacturing facilities.and as needed to adjust for market demand. Capital expenditures for fiscal 20082011 are expectedplanned to be approximately $45 to $50$60 million which is approximately $3 to $8 million higher than fiscal 2007 capital expenditures, as we expect to continue to invest in tooling for new products and manufacturing equipment.

Engineering and Research

We are committed to an ongoing engineering program dedicated to developing innovative new products and improvements in the quality and performance of existing products. However, a focus on innovation also carries certain risks that new technology could be slow to be accepted or not accepted by the marketplace. We attempt to mitigate this risk through our focus on and commitment to understanding our customers’ needs and requirements. We are investing more time upfront with customers, using “Voice of the Customer” tools to ensure we develop innovative products that meet or exceed customer expectations. We are also utilizing Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) tools and enhancing our New Product Development System to ensure early manufacturing involvement in new product designs to reducetooling, replacement production costs. DFMA focuses on reducing the numberequipment, expansion of parts required to assemble new productsour vertical integration capabilities, as well as designing productsa new manufacturing facility in Eastern Europe.

Raw Materials

During fiscal 2010, we experienced higher average commodity costs compared to move more efficiently through the manufacturing process. We are also making several improvements to our engineering process as part of our Lean initiatives.

Our engineering expenses are primarily incurred in connection with the development of new products that may have additional applications or represent extensions of existing product lines, improvements to existing products, and cost reduction efforts. Our expendituresaverage prices paid for engineering and research were $59.9 million (3.2 percent of net sales)commodities in fiscal 2007, $57.3 million (3.1 percent2009, particularly in the second half of net sales)fiscal 2010, which hampered our gross margin growth rate in fiscal 2006, and $52.6 million (3.0 percent of net sales) in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2008, we anticipate engineering and research costs to increase2010 as compared to fiscal 2007 as2009. We anticipate the rising commodity prices we planexperienced during the second half of fiscal 2010 will continue into fiscal 2011. Historically, we have offset, and we currently expect to continue to investmitigate, commodity cost increases in engineering, research,part by continuing efforts to engage in proactive vendor negotiations, reviewing alternative sourcing options, substituting materials, engaging in internal cost reduction efforts, and new product development.increasing prices on some of our products, all as appropriate.

Raw Materials

Most of the components of our products are also affected by commodity cost pressures and are commercially available from a number of sources and are in adequate supply. Therefore, we are generally not dependent on any one supplier, except for engines from Japanese suppliers used in some of our professional segment products.

sources. In fiscal 2007,2010, we experienced no significant work stoppages as a result of shortages of raw materials or commodities. The highest valueraw material and component costs are generally for steel, engines, steel,hydraulic components, transmissions, transaxles, hydraulics,plastic resin, and electric motors, and plastic resinwhich are purchased from several suppliers around the world. We have some long-term commitments for the purchase of various component parts and raw materials that management believes are unlikely to be terminated prematurely.

During fiscal 2007, we continued to experience an increase in commodity costs, which hampered our gross margin growth rate in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. We have offset and expect to continue to mitigate in part the impact of these increased costs by engaging in proactive vendor negotiations and internal cost reduction efforts, reviewing alternative sourcing options, and introducing moderate price increases on some products.

Service and Warranty

Our products are warranted to ensure customer confidence in design, workmanship, and overall quality. Warranty length varies depending on whether product usagecoverage is for “residential” or “professional” applications within individual product lines. Somespecified periods of time and on select products have an over-the-counter exchange option and some have a 30-day satisfaction guarantee. Warranty coverage ranges from a periodhours of six months to seven years,usage, and generally covers parts, labor, and other expenses for non-maintenance repairs. Warranty coverage generally does not cover operator abuse andor improper use. An authorized Toro, Lawn-Boy, Hayter, Exmark, or Pope distributor or dealer must perform warranty work. Distributors dealers, and contractorsdealers submit claims for warranty reimbursement and are credited for the cost of repairs, labor, and other expenses as long as the repairs meet our prescribed standards. AtWarranty expense is accrued at the time of sale we accrue a warranty reserve based on amongthe type and estimated number of products under warranty, historical average costs incurred to service warranty claims, the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, and other factors, historical claims experience by individual product lines for estimated costs in connection with futureminor factors. Special warranty claims. Warranty reserves are also accrued for major rework campaigns and product recalls.campaigns. Service support outside of the warranty period is provided by independent Toro, Lawn-Boy, Hayter, or Exmark


authorized distributors and dealers at the customer’scustomer's expense. We also sell extended warranty coverage on select products for a prescribed period after the original factory warranty period expires.

Product Liability

We have rigorous product safety standards and continually work continually to improve the safety and reliability of our products. We monitor for accidents and possible claims and establish liability estimates with


respect to claims based on internal evaluations of the merits of individual claims. We purchase excess insurance coverage for catastrophic product liability claims for incidents that exceed our self-insured retention levels.

Patents and Trademarks

We hold patents in the United States and foreign countries and apply for patents as applicable. Although we believe our patents are valuable and patent protection is beneficial, our patent protection will not necessarily deter or prevent competitors from attempting to develop similar products. We are not materially dependent on any one or more of our patents.

To prevent possible infringement of our patents by others, we periodically review competitors’competitors' products. To help avoid potential liability with respect to others’others' patents, we regularly review certain patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)("USPTO") and foreign patent offices. We believe these activities help us minimize our risk of being a defendant in patent infringement litigation. We are currently involved in patent litigation cases both where we are asserting infringement of our patents and where we are defending against charges of infringement. While the ultimate results of the current cases are unknown at this time, we believe that the outcome of these cases is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.by competitors.

Seasonality

Sales of our residential products, which accounted for approximately 3035 percent of total consolidated net sales in fiscal 2007,2010, are seasonal, with sales of lawn and garden products occurring primarily between February and May, depending upon seasonal weather conditions and salesdemand for our products. Sales of snow removal equipment occurringproducts occur primarily between July and January.January, depending upon seasonal snow falls, product availability, and demand for our snow removal products. Opposite seasons in some global markets somewhat moderate this seasonality of residential product sales. Seasonality of professional product sales also exists but is tempered because the selling season onin the West Coast, in Southern states and in our markets in the Southern hemisphere such as Australia, Latin America, and parts of Asia continuecontinues for a longer portion of the year than in Northern regions of the world.

Overall, worldwide sales levels are historically highest in our fiscal second quarter and retail demand is generally highest in our fiscal third quarter. Typically, accounts receivable balances increase between January and April as a result of higher sales volumes and extended payment terms made available to our customers. Accounts receivable balances decrease between May and December when payments are received. Our financing requirements are subject to variations due to seasonal changes in working capital levels which typically increase in the first half of our fiscal year and then decrease in the second half of our fiscal year. Seasonal cash requirements of our business are financed from a combination of cash balances, cash flows from operations, and with our bank credit lines. Peak borrowing generally occurs between January and April.

The following table shows total consolidated net sales and net earnings for each fiscal quarter as a percentage of the total fiscal year.

 

Fiscal 2007

 

Fiscal 2006

 

 

 

Net

 

Net

 

Net

 

Net

 

 Fiscal 2010  Fiscal 2009  

Quarter

 

Sales

 

Earnings

 

Sales

 

Earnings

 

 Net
Sales
 Net
Earnings
 Net
Sales
 Net
Earnings
(Loss)
 
 

First

 

 

20

%

 

13

%

 

20

%

 

11

%

 20% 12% 22% 11%

Second

 

 

37

 

 

53

 

 

36

 

 

54

 

 33 49 33 59 

Third

 

 

25

 

 

30

 

 

26

 

 

31

 

 27 36 26 31 

Fourth

 

 

18

 

 

4

 

 

18

 

 

4

 

 20 3 19 (1)
 

Effects of Weather

From time to time, weather conditions in a particular geographic region or market may adversely or positively affect sales of some of our products and field inventory levels and result in a negative or positive impact on our future net sales. As the percentage of our net sales from outside the United States has continued to increase,increases, our dependency on weather in any one part of the world has decreased.decreases. Nonetheless, weather conditions could materially affect our future net sales.

Working Capital

We fund our operations through a combination of cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, short-term borrowings under our credit facilities, and long-term debt. Wherever possible, cash management is centralized and intercompany financing is used to provide working capital to subsidiaries as needed. In addition, our credit facilities are available for additional working capital needs, acquisitions, or other investment opportunities.

Distribution and Marketing

We market the majority of our products through approximately 5040 domestic and 100120 foreign distributors, as well as a large number of outdoor power equipment dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, and mass retailers in more than 90 countries worldwide.

Toro and Lawn-Boy residential   Residential products, such as walk power mowers, riding products, and snow throwers, are mainly sold directly to home centers, dealers, hardware retailers, and mass retailers. In certain markets, these same products are sold to distributors, including Toro-owned distributors for resale to retail dealers throughout the United States. Walk power mowers, snow throwers, and riding products are also sold directly to dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, and mass retailers.dealers. Home solutions products and retail irrigation products are primarily sold directly to home centers, mass retailers, hardware retailers, and dealers. We also sell selected residential products over the Internet, mainly through Internet retailers.Internet. Internationally, residential products are sold directdirectly to retail dealers and mass merchandisers in Australia, Belgium, Canada, and the United Kingdom.select countries in Europe. In most other countries, products are mainly sold to distributors for resale to dealers and mass retailers.

Worldwide, professional   Professional products are sold mainly to distributors for resale to dealers, sports complexes, industrial facilities, contractors, municipalities,government customers, rental stores, and golf courses. We also sell


some professional segment products directly to government


customers and rental companies. Selectedcompanies, as well as directly to end-users in certain international markets. Select residential/commercial irrigation products are also sold directly to professional irrigation distributors.distributors and certain retail irrigation products are sold directly to home centers. Compact utility loaders and attachments are sold directly to dealers and directly to large rental companies. Toro and Exmark landscape contractor products are also sold directdirectly to dealers in certain regions of the United States.

We currently own two domestic   During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our wholly owned distribution companies.company completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of an independent U.S. Midwestern-based distribution company. On October 29, 2010, we completed the purchase of an independent U.S. Western-based distribution company. Our primary purposes in owning domestic distributorships are to facilitate ownership transfers while improving operations and to test and deploy new strategies and business practices that could be replicated by our independent distributors. These distribution companies sell professional and residential products directly to retail dealers and customers in the United States and a majority of their revenues are derived from Toro-manufactured products.

Our distribution systems are intended to assure quality of sales and market presence as well as effective after-purchase service and support. We believe our distribution network provides a competitive advantage in marketing and selling our products.products in part because our primary distribution network is focused on selling and marketing our products and also because of the long-term relationships they have established and experienced personnel they utilize to deliver high levels of customer satisfaction.

Our current marketing strategy is to maintain distinct brands and brand identification for Toro®Toro®, Exmark®Exmark®, Irritrol®Irritrol®, Lawn-Boy®Hayter®, Hayter®Pope®, Lawn Genie®, Pope®Lawn-Boy®, and Rain Master™Lawn Genie® products.

We advertise our residential products during appropriate seasons throughout the year mainly on television, on the radio, in print, and via the Internet. Professional products are advertised mainly in print and through direct mail programs, as well as on the Internet. Most of our advertising emphasizes our brand names. Advertising is purchased by the companyus as well as through cooperative programs with distributors, dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, and mass retailers.

Customers

Overall, we believe that in the long-term we are not dependent on any single customer. However, The Home Depot accounted for greater than 10approximately 13.1 percent of our total consolidated netgross sales in fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005.2010. The residential segment of our business is dependent on The Home Depot as a customer. While the loss of any substantial customer, including The Home Depot, could have a material adverse short-term impact on our business, we believe that our diverse distribution channels and customer base should reduce the long-term impact of any such loss.

Backlog of Orders

Our backlog of orders is dependent upon when customers place orders, and not necessarily an indicator of our expected results for the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 20082011 or our fiscal 2008 sales growth.2011 net sales. The approximate backlog of orders believed to be firm as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was $70.0$96.3 million and $120.6$85.1 million, respectively, a decreasean increase of 4213.2 percent. This declineincrease was primarily the result of higher stocking orders for our professional segment products due to our domestic customers purchasing product closer to retailcontinued strong demand becauseas a result of the uncertainty of the economy. Residential segmentimproving economic conditions. Somewhat offsetting this increase were lower open orders for snow thrower products were also downas of the end of fiscal 2010 as compared to lastthe end of fiscal year2009 due to customers’ uncertaintythe timing of the upcoming snow season because of lower levelsintroduction for our redesigned offering of snow fall during the 2006-2007 winter season in key markets. In addition, backlog of orders for our international businesses were also down as of October 31, 2007 compared to October 31, 2006 due to international customers placing ordersthrower products last year that shipped in the first quarter of fiscal 20082010 instead of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.2009. We expect the existing backlog of orders will be filled in early fiscal 2008.2011.

Competition

Our products are sold in highly competitive markets throughout the world. The principal competitive factors in our markets are pricing, product innovation, quality and reliability, product support and customer service, pricing, warranty, brand awareness, reputation, distribution, shelf space, and financing options. Pricing volatility has become an increasingly important competitive factor for a majority of our products. We believe we offer total solutions and full service packages with high quality products that have the latest technology and design innovations. Also, by selling our products through a network of distributors, dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, and mass retailers, we offer comprehensive service support during and after the warranty period. We compete in many product lines with numerous manufacturers, many of which have greater operationaloperations and financial resources than us. We believe that we have a competitive advantage because we manufacture a broad range of product lines, we are committed to product innovation and customer service, we focus on Lean manufacturing methods, we have a strong focus in maintaining landscapes, and our distribution channels position us well to compete in various markets.

Internationally, residential segment products face more competition where foreign competitors manufacture and market products in their respective countries. We experience this competition primarily in Europe and Asia.Europe. In addition, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may affect the price of our products in foreign markets, thereby impacting their competitiveness. We provide pricing support to foreign customers, as needed, to remain competitive in international markets.

Environmental Matters and
Other Governmental Regulation

We are subject to a wide variety ofnumerous federal, state, international, and other governmental laws, rules, and regulations. Theseregulations relating to, among others, climate change; emissions to air and discharges to water;


product and associated packaging; import and export compliance, including country of origin certification requirements; worker and product user health and safety; energy efficiency; product life-cycles; and the generation, use, handling, labeling, collection, management, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of hazardous substances, wastes, and other regulated materials. For example:

The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the California Air Resources Board, and similar regulators in other U.S. states and foreign jurisdictions in which we sell our products have phased in, or are phasing in, emission regulations setting maximum emission standards for certain equipment. Specifically, the EPA has adopted increasingly stringent engine emission regulations, including Tier 4 emission requirements that beginning in 2012 are applicable to diesel engines in a specified horsepower range that are used in some of our products.
The United States federal government, several U.S. states and certain foreign jurisdictions in which we sell our products, including the European Union ("EU") and each of its member states, have implemented one or more of the following: (i) the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment ("WEEE") directive or similar product life-cycle management laws, rules, or regulations, which mandate the labeling, collection, and disposal of specified waste electrical and electronic equipment, including some of our products; (ii) the Restriction on the use of Hazardous Substances ("RoHS") directive or similar substance level laws, rules, or regulations, which restrict the use of several specified hazardous materials in the manufacture of specific types of electrical and electronic equipment, including some of our products; (iii) country of origin laws, rules, or regulations, which require certification of the geographic origin of our finished goods products and/or components used in our products through documentation and/or physical markings, as applicable; (iv) energy efficiency laws, rules, or regulations, which are intended to reduce the use and inefficiencies associated with energy and natural resource consumption and require specified efficiency ratings and capabilities for certain products, including some of our products; and (v) product life-cycle laws, rules, or regulations, which are intended to reduce waste and environmental and human health impact and require manufacturers to collect, dispose, and recycle certain products, including some of our products, at the end of their useful life.
Our residential products are subject to various federal, state, and international laws, rules, and regulations that are designed to protect consumers and we are subject to the rules and regulations of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

   Although we believe that we are in substantial compliance with currently applicable laws, rules, and regulations, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact of adopted or future laws, rules, and regulations on our business. Such laws, rules, or regulations may cause us to incur significant expenses to achieve or maintain compliance, may require us to modify our products, may adversely affect the price of or demand for some of our products, and may ultimately affect the way we conduct our operations, and failureoperations. Failure to comply with these current or future regulations could lead to fines and other penalties.penalties, including restrictions on the importation of our products into, or the sale of our products in, one or more jurisdictions until compliance is achieved.

   We are also involved in the evaluation and clean-up of a limited number of properties currently and previously owned. We do not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

The European Union (EU) has adopted the following environmental directives: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment


(WEEE) and Restriction on the use of Hazardous Substances (RoHS). Both directives are transposed into legislation in the 27 EU member states. The WEEE directive mandates the labeling, collection, and disposal of electrical and electronic equipment. The RoHS directive bans the sale of electrical and electronic equipment containing certain, or certain levels of, hazardous substances, such as lead, mercury, chromium, cadmium, and brominated-flame retardants. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with these regulations.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) have adopted emission regulations setting maximum emission standards for certain off-road equipment. New engine emission regulations are being phased in by the federal government and the State of California. Our products are also subject to international laws and regulations related to emissions in places where we sell our products outside the United States. We are currently unable to predict the ultimate impact of the adopted and proposed regulations on our business.

Our residential products are subject to various United States statutes designed to protect consumers and are subject to the administrative jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. We are also subject to international, federal and state environmental, occupational safety, transportation, and other regulations. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all such regulations, none of which has had a material adverse effect on our operations or business.

Customer Financing

Wholesale Financing – Financing.Toro Credit Company, our wholly owned finance   In fiscal 2009, we established a joint venture with TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. ("TCFIF"), a subsidiary providesof TCF National Bank, named Red Iron Acceptance, LLC ("Red Iron"). The purpose of Red Iron is to provide inventory financing, for select products we manufacture for North American Toro distributorsincluding floor plan and approximately 180 selected U.S. dealers. Toro Credit Company purchases select receivables from our distributors for extended periods that assist theopen account receivable financing, to distributors and dealers of our products in the U.S. and to carry representative inventoriesselect distributors of equipment. Downour products in Canada. Red Iron began financing open account receivables, as well as floor plan receivables previously financed by a third party financing company, during our first quarter of fiscal 2010. Under a separate arrangement, TCF Commercial Finance Canada, Inc. ("TCFCFC") implemented a program to provide inventory financing to dealers of our products in Canada during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Under these financing arrangements, down payments are not required and, depending on the finance program for each product line, finance charges are incurred by us, shared between us and the distributor and/or the dealer, or paid by the distributor or dealer. ARed Iron retains a security interest is retained in the distributors’distributors' and dealers’dealers' financed inventories, and those inventories are monitored regularly. TermsFloor plan terms to the distributors and dealers require payment as the equipment, which secures the indebtedness, is sold to customers, or when payment terms become due, whichever occurs first. Rates are based on prime rategenerally indexed to LIBOR plus a fixed percentage that differs based on whether the financing is for a distributor or dealer. Rates may also vary based on the product that is financed.

Independent   Toro continues to provide inventory financing directly to home centers and mass retailers; general line irrigation dealers; international distributors and dealers, that do not finance through Toro Credit Companyother than the Canadian distributors and dealers to whom Red Iron provides financing arrangements; and government customers. Some independent international dealers continue to finance their inventoriesproducts with third party sources. The finance charges represent interest for a pre-established length of time based on a predefined rate by a contract

End-User Financing.   We have agreements with third party financing sources. Exmark and some international products sold through dealers are financed primarily with third party financing sources or by the distributor.

End-User Financing – We have agreements with a third party financing companycompanies to provide lease-financing options to golf course and sports fields and grounds equipment customers and micro-irrigation customers in North America, Europe, and Australia.the U.S. The purpose of these agreements is to increase sales by giving buyers of our products alternative financing options when purchasing our products.


We also have a multi-year agreementagreements with a third party financing companycompanies to provide financing programs under aboth generic and private label programprograms in the U.S. This program,and Canada. These programs, offered primarily to Toro and Exmark dealers, providesprovide end-user customers a revolving lineand installment lines of credit for Toro and Exmark products, parts, and services.

Distributor Financing – Financing.Occasionally, we enter into long-term loan agreements with some distributors. These transactions are used for expansion of the distributors’distributors' businesses, acquisitions, refinancing working capital agreements, or ownership changes.transitions.

Employees

During fiscal 2007,2010, we employed an average of 5,3204,607 employees. The total number of employees as of October 31, 20072010 was 5,273.4,609. We consider our employee relations to be good. Three collective bargaining agreements cover approximately 1719 percent of these employees. These three agreements expire in October 2008,2011, October 2013, and May 2010, and October 2010.2014. From time to time, we also retain consultants,temporary and part-time workers, independent contractors, and temporary and part-time workers.consultants.

Available Information

Filings with the SEC – We are a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), and file reports, proxy statements, and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)("SEC"). Copies of these reports, proxy statements, and other information can be inspected and copied at the SEC’sSEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Because we make filings to the SEC electronically, you may also access this information from the SEC’sSEC's home page on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov.

We make available, free of charge on our Internet web sitewww.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information”"Investor Information" link and then the “Financials”"Financials" link), our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statementsProxy Statements on Schedule 14A, amendments to those reports, and other documents filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The


information contained on our web site or connected to our web site is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report.

Corporate Governance – We have a Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, a Code of Conduct for all employees, and a Board of Directors Business Ethics Policy Statement. Copies of these documents are posted on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link). If we amend or grant any waivers to the codes that are applicable to our executive officers, which we do not anticipate doing, we have committed that we will post the amendments or waivers on our web site under “Corporate Governance.”

We also make available, free of charge on our web site at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link) and in print to any stockholder who requests, our corporate governance guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Resources Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, and Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. Requests for copies can be directed to Investor Relations, telephone: (952) 887-7141.

We have furnished to the SEC the required certifications under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding the quality of our public disclosures as Exhibits 31(a) and 31(b) to this report. We have filed with the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the CEO certification regarding our compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards as required by NYSE Rule 3030A.12(a) on March 21, 2007.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains, or incorporates by reference, not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, and that are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. In addition, we or others on our behalf may make forward-looking statements from time to time in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or web casts open to the public, in press releases or reports, on our web sites or otherwise. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations and assumptions. We try to identify forward-looking statements in this report and elsewhere by using words such as “expect”, “looking ahead”, “outlook”, “optimistic”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “estimate”, “believe”, “should”, “could”, “may”, “intend”,"expect," "strive," "looking ahead," "outlook," "forecast," "optimistic," "anticipate," "continue," "plan," "estimate," "believe," "should," "could," "will," "would," "possible," "may," "likely," "intend," and similar expressions.expressions or future dates. Our forward-looking statements generally relate to our future performance, including our anticipated operating results, and liquidity requirements, and financial condition; our business strategies and goals,goals; and the effect of laws, rules, regulations, as well as new accounting pronouncements, and outstanding litigation on our business operating results, and financial condition.future performance.

Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market as well as matters specific to Toro. The most significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position, or future financial performance are described in this reportbelow in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk"Risk Factors." We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement which speaks only as of the date made and to recognize that forward-looking statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this report, including in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk"Risk Factors," as well as others that we may consider immaterial or do not anticipate at this time. The risks and uncertainties described in this report, including in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk"Risk Factors," are not exclusive and further information concerning our company and our businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect our operating results or financial condition, may emerge from time to time.

We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. We advise you, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our future quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and current reportsCurrent Reports on Form 8-K that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.



10




ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following are significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry,operating results, financial position,condition, or future financial performance.

Changes inIf economic conditions and outlook in the United States and aroundin the world could adversely affectother countries in which we conduct business do not continue to improve or if they worsen, our net sales.sales and earnings could be adversely affected.

The demandDemand for our products is dependentdepends upon economic conditions and outlook includingin the U.S. and in the other countries in which we conduct business, which include but are not limited to recessionary conditions; slow or negative economic growth rates; continued slow downsdown or reductions in levels of golf course development, renovation, and improvement; increased levels of golf course closures; continued slow down or reductions in levels of home ownership, construction, and home sales; home foreclosures; reduced consumer spending levels; employment rates;reduced credit availability or unfavorable credit terms for our distributors, dealers, and end-user customers; higher commodity costs and fuel prices; higher short-term, mortgage, and other interest rates; inflation;continued high unemployment rates; inflationary or deflationary pressures; negative consumer confidence; and general economic and political conditions and expectationsexpectations. Several of these factors have, in the United Statespast, caused our distributors, dealers, and the foreign economies in which we conduct business. Inflationary pressures, higher fuel prices, higher short-term and mortgage interest rates, and a negative economic outlook could cause consumersend-user customers to reduce spending and delay or forego purchases of our products, which could havehas had an adverse effect on our net sales and earnings. If economic conditions and outlook in the U.S. and in the other countries in which we conduct business do not continue to improve, or if they worsen, our net sales and earnings could continue to be adversely affected in the future.

Increases in the cost, andor disruption in the availability, of raw materials and components that we purchase and increases in our other costs of doing business, such as transportation costs, may adversely affect our profit margins and business.

We purchase raw materials such as steel, aluminum, fuel, petroleum-based resins, linerboard, and other commodities, and components, such as engines, transmissions, transaxles, hydraulics, and electric motors, for use in our products. Increases in the cost of such raw materials and components may adversely affect our profit margins if we are unable to pass along anyto our customers these cost increases in the form of price increases or otherwise reduce our cost of goods sold. In the past, the benefits from ourHistorically, we have used internal cost reduction efforts, as well as proactive vendor negotiations, reviewing alternativealternate sourcing options, substitute materials, and moderate price increases on some of our products haveto offset a portion of increased raw material, component, and componentother costs. However, we cannot commit that we willmay not be able to continue tofully offset any such increased costs in the future. Further, if our price increases are not accepted by our customers and the market, our net sales, earnings, and market share could be adversely affected. Although most of the raw materials and components ofused in our products are commercially available from a number of sources and in adequate supply, any disruption in the availability of such raw materials and components, our inability to timely or otherwise obtain substitutes for such items, or any deterioration in our relationships with or the financial viability of our suppliers could adversely affect our business. Increases in our other costs of doing business may also adversely affect our profit margins and business. For example, an increase in fuel costs may also result in an increase in our transportation costs, which also could adversely affect our operating results and business.

Weather conditions may reduce demand for some of our products and adversely affect our net sales.

From time to time, weather conditions in a particular geographic region may adversely affect sales and field inventory levels of some of our products and field inventory levels.products. For example, in the past, drought conditions have had an adverse effect on sales of certain mowing equipment products, unusually rainy weather or severe drought conditions that result in watering bans have had an adverse effect on sales of our irrigation products, and lower snow fall accumulations in key markets have had an adverse effect on sales of our snow thrower products. To the extent that such unfavorable weather conditions are exacerbated by global climate change or otherwise, our sales may be affected to a greater degree than we have previously experienced.

Our professional segment net sales are dependent upon the level of growth in the residentialgolf course revenues and commercial construction markets, growth of homeowners’ outsourcing lawn care, the amount of investment in golf course renovations and improvements,improvements; the level of new golf course development and golf course closures,closures; the level of homeowners who outsource their lawn care; the level of residential and commercial construction; the availability of credit to professional segment customers on acceptable terms to finance new product purchases; and amount of government spending.revenues, budget, and spending levels for grounds maintenance equipment.

Our professional segment products are sold by distributors or dealers, or sold directly to government customers, rental companies, and professional users engaged in maintaining and creating landscapes, such as golf courses, sports fields, municipal properties, and residential and commercial landscapes. Ourlandscapes, and governmental and municipal properties. Accordingly, our professional segment net sales therefore, are dependent upon the level of growth in residentialimpacted by golf course revenues and commercial construction markets, growth of homeowners’ outsourcing lawn care, the amount of investment in golf course renovations and improvements,improvements; the level of new golf course construction,development and golf course closures; the level of homeowners' who outsource their lawn care; the level of residential and commercial



construction; availability of credit to professional segment customers on acceptable terms to finance new product purchases; and the amount of government spending. Reduced tax revenue, increased expenses, and tighter government budgets generally result in reduced government spending for new grounds maintenance equipment, whichequipment. Among other things, any one or a combination of the following factors could have an adverse effect on our professional segment net sales. In addition, a slow ratesales:

reduced levels of growthinvestment in golf course renovations and improvements and new golf course development; reduced number of golf rounds played that impactsat public and private golf courses resulting in reduced revenue for such golf courses; decreased membership at private golf courses resulting in reduced revenue and, in certain cases, financial difficulties for such golf courses; and increased number of golf course closures, any one of which or any combination of which could adversely affectresult in a decrease in spending and demand for our salesproducts;
reduced consumer and business spending, causing homeowners not to outsource lawn care and landscape contractor professionals to forego or postpone purchases of golf course equipmentour products;
low or reduced levels of commercial and irrigation products.

residential construction, resulting in a decrease in demand for our products; and
reduced tax revenue, increased governmental expenses in other areas, tighter government budgets and government deficits, generally resulting in reduced government spending for grounds maintenance equipment;

Our residential segment net sales are dependent upon The Home Depot, Inc. as a major customer, the amount of product placement at retailers, consumer confidence and spending levels, and changing buying patterns of customers, and The Home Depot, Inc. as a major customer.customers.

The elimination or reduction of shelf space assigned to our residential products by retailers could adversely affect our residential segment net sales. Our residential segment net sales are also dependent upon changing buying patterns of customers. For example, in the last decade, there has been a trend away from purchasesconsumer purchasing at dealer outlets and hardware retailers to purchasing at home centers and mass retailers, as well as a trend for broader and lower price and value sensitive


purchasespoints at home centers and mass retailers. This trend hasThese trends have resulted in aan increased demand for residential segment products purchased at retailers, such as The Home Depot, which accounted for greater thanapproximately 10 to 14 percent of our total consolidated net sales in each of fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005.2008. We believe that our diverse distribution channels and customer base should reduce the long-term impact on us if we were to lose The Home Depot or any other substantial customer. However, the loss of any substantial customer, a significant reduction in sales to The Home Depot or other customers, or our inability to respond to future changes in buying patterns of customers and new distribution channels could have a material adverse impact on our business and operating results. Changing buying patterns of customers also could result in reduced sales of one or more of our residential segment products, resulting in increased inventory levels. Although our residential lawn and garden products are generally manufactured throughout the year, our residential snow removal equipment products are generally manufactured in the summer and fall months.months but may be extended into the winter months depending upon demand. Our production levels and inventory management goals are based on estimates of retail demand for our products, taking into account production capacity, timing of shipments, and field inventory levels. If we overestimate or underestimate demand during a given season, we may have excessnot maintain the appropriate inventory levels, which could negatively impact our net sales, working capital, or sub-optimal inventories.hinder our ability to meet customer demand.

If we are unable to continue to enhance existing products and develop and market new products that respond to customer needs and preferences and achieve market acceptance, we may experience a decrease in demand for our products, and our business could suffer.net sales, which have historically benefited from sales of new products, may be adversely affected.

One of our growth strategies is to develop innovative, customer-valued products to generate revenue growth. OurIn the past, our sales from new products, which we define as those introduced in the pastcurrent and previous two fiscal years, have represented a significant component of our net sales and are expected to continue to represent a significant component of our future net sales. We may not be able to compete as effectively with our competitors, and ultimately satisfy the needs and preferences of our customers, unless we can continue to enhance existing products and develop new innovative products in the markets in which we compete. Product development requires significant financial, technological, and other resources. Although in the past we have implemented Lean manufacturing and other productivity improvement initiatives to provide investment funding for product enhancements and new products, we cannot be certain that we will be able to continue to do so in the future. Product improvements and new product introductions also require significant planning, design, development, and testing at the technological, product, and manufacturing process levels and we may not be able to timely develop and introduce product improvements or new products. Our competitors’competitors' new products may beat our products to market, may be more effective with more features and/or less expensive than our products, obtain better market acceptance, or render our products obsolete. Any new products that we develop may not receive market acceptance or otherwise generate any meaningful net sales or profits for us relative to our expectations based on, among other things, existing and anticipated investments in manufacturing capacity and commitments to fund advertising, marketing, promotional programs, and research and development.



We face intense competition in all of our product lines with numerous manufacturers, including from some that have greater financialoperations and otherfinancial resources than we do.us. We may not be able to compete effectively against competitors’competitors' actions, which could harm our business and operating results.

Our products are sold in highly competitive markets throughout the world. Principal competitive factors in our markets include pricing, product innovation, quality and reliability, product support and customer service, pricing, warranty, brand awareness, reputation, distribution, product placement and shelf space, and financing options. We compete in all of our product lines with numerous manufacturers, some which have substantially greater financial, marketing,operations and otherfinancial resources than we do.us. As a result, they may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer preferences, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion, and sale of their products than we can. In addition, competition could increase if new companies enter the market or if existing competitors expand their product lines or intensify efforts within existing product lines. Our current products, products under development, and our ability to develop new and improved products may be insufficient to enable us to compete effectively with our competitors. Internationally, our residential segment products typically face more competition where foreign competitors manufacture and market products in their respective countries. We experience this competition primarily in Europe and Asia.Europe. In addition, fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may affect the price of our products in foreign markets, thereby impacting their competitiveness. Pricing volatility has also become an increasingly important competitive factor for many of our products. We may not be able to compete effectively against competitors’competitors' actions, which may include the movement by competitors of significant manufacturing to Chinalow cost countries for significant cost and price reductions, and which could harm our business and operating results.


A significant percentage of our consolidated net sales isare generated outside of the United States, and we intend to continue to expand our international operations. Our international operations require significant management attention and financial resources;resources, expose us to difficulties presented by international economic, political, legal, accounting, and business factors;factors, and may not be successful or produce desired levels of net sales.

We currently manufacture our products in the United States, Mexico, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Italy for sale throughout the world and maintain sales offices in the United States, Belgium, the United Kingdom, France, Australia, Singapore, Japan, China, Italy, and Switzerland.Korea. Additionally, in fiscal 2010, we purchased land in Eastern Europe where we intend to build a manufacturing facility. Our net sales outside the United States were 29.031.8 percent, 27.032.0 percent, and 24.832.4 percent of our total consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively. International markets have, in the past and will continue to be, a focus for us to grow our revenues. For example, in February 2005, we completed the acquisition of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Hayter Limited, a company located in the United Kingdom that designs, manufactures, and markets residential and professional turf maintenance equipment, primarily for the United Kingdom market.revenue growth. We believe many opportunities exist in the international markets, and our goal isover time we intend for international net sales to comprise a larger percentage of our total consolidated net sales. TheSeveral factors, including weakened international economic conditions, could adversely affect our international net sales. Additionally, the expansion of our existing international operations and entry into additional international markets requiresrequire significant management attention and financial resources. Many of the countries in which we sell our products, or otherwise have an international presence are, to some degree, subject to political, economic, and/or social instability.instability, including drug cartel-related violence, which may disrupt our production activities and maquiladora operations based in Juarez, Mexico. Our international operations expose us and our representatives, agents, and distributors to risks inherent in operating in foreign jurisdictions. These risks include:

·

increased costs of customizing products for foreign countries;

·

difficulties in managing and staffing international operations and increases in infrastructure costs including legal, tax, accounting, and information technology;

·

the imposition of additional U.S. and foreign governmental controls or regulations; new or enhanced trade restrictions and restrictions on the activities of foreign agents, representatives, and distributors; and the imposition of our increases in, costly and lengthy import and export licensing and other compliance requirements, customs duties and tariffs, import and export quotas and other trade restrictions, license obligations, and other non-tariff barriers to trade;

·

the imposition of U.S. and/or international sanctions against a country, company, person, or entity with whom we do business that would restrict or prohibit our continued business with the sanctioned country, company, person, or entity;

·

international pricing pressures;

·

laws and business practices favoring local companies;

·

adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations;

·

longer payment cycles and difficulties in enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through certain foreign legal systems;

·

difficulties in enforcing or defending intellectual property rights; and

·

multiple, changing, and often inconsistent enforcement of laws, rules, and regulations, including in particular, rules relating to environmental, health, and safety matters.

Our international operations in other countries may not produce desired levels of net sales or one or more of the factors listed above may harm our business and operating results. Any material decrease in our international sales or profitability could also adversely impact our operating results.

   In addition, a portion of our international net sales are financed by third parties. The termination of our agreements with these third


parties, any material change to the terms of our agreements with these third parties or in the availability or terms of credit offered to our international customers by these third parties, or any delay in securing replacement credit sources, could adversely affect our sales and operating results.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could result in declines in our reported net sales and net earnings.

Because the functional currency of our foreign operations is the applicable local currency, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk arising from transactions in the normal course of business, such as sales and loans to wholly owned subsidiaries as well as sales to third party customers, purchases from suppliers, and bank lines of credit with creditors denominated in foreign currencies. Our reported net sales and net earnings are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Because our products are manufactured or sourced primarily from the United States and Mexico, a stronger U.S. dollar and Mexican peso generally has a negative impact on our operating results, from operations outside the United States while a weaker dollar and peso generally has a positive effect. Our primary foreign currency exchange rate exposure is with the EU Euro, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Mexican peso, and the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar. While we actively manage the exposure of our foreign currency market risk in the normal course of business by entering into various foreign exchange contracts, these instruments involve risks and may not effectively limit our underlying exposure from currency exchange rate fluctuations or minimize our net earnings and cash volatility associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. Further, a number of financial institutions similar to those that serve as counterparties to our foreign exchange contracts have been adversely affected by the unprecedented distress in the worldwide credit markets. The failure of one or more counterparties to our foreign currency exchange rate contracts to fulfill their obligations to us could adversely affect our operating results.

We manufacture our products at and distribute our products from several locations in the United States and internationally. Any disruption at any of these facilities or in our inability to cost-effectively expand existing, open and manage new, and/or move production between manufacturing facilities could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We currently manufacture most of our products at seven locations in the United States, two locations in Mexico, and one location in each of Australia, Italy, and the United Kingdom. We also have several locations that serve as distribution centers, warehouses, test facilities, and corporate offices. In addition, we have agreements to manufacture products at several third-party manufacturers. These


facilities may be affected by natural or man-made disasters.disasters and other external events, including drug cartel-related violence that may disrupt our production activities and maquiladora operations based in Juarez, Mexico. In the event that one of our manufacturing facilities was affected by a disaster or other event, we could be forced to shift production to one of our other manufacturing facilities. Although we purchase insurance for damage to our property and disruption of our business from casualties, such insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our potential losses. Any disruption in our manufacturing capacity could have an adverse impact on our ability to produce sufficient quantitiesinventory of our products or may require us to incur additional expenses in order to produce sufficient quantities,inventory, and therefore, may adversely affect our net sales and operating results. Any disruption or delay at our manufacturing facilities, including a work slowdown, strike, or similar action at any one of our three facilities operating under a collective bargaining agreement or the failure to renew or enter into a new collective bargaining agreements, including one such agreement that expires in fiscal 2011, could impair our ability to meet the demands of our customers, and our customers may cancel orders or purchase products from our competitors, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

   Our operating results may also be adversely affected if we are unable to cost-effectively expand existingopen and manage new manufacturing and distribution facilities, and move production between manufacturingsuch facilities as needed from time to time. In fiscal 2010, we purchased land in Eastern Europe where we intend to build a manufacturing facility for micro-irrigation products. If the facility does not produce the anticipated manufacturing and operational efficiencies, or if the micro-irrigation products to be produced at this facility are not accepted into new geographic markets at expected levels, we may not recover the costs of the new facility and our operating results may be adversely affected.

We intend to grow our business through additional acquisitions and alliances, stronger customer relations, and new joint ventures and partnerships, which are risky and could harm our business.

One of our growth strategies is to drive growth in our businesses and accelerate opportunities to expand our global presence through targeted acquisitions and alliances, stronger customer relations, and new joint ventures and partnerships that complementadd value while considering our existing brands and product portfolio. In February 2005, we completed the acquisition of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Hayter Limited in the United Kingdom, and in August 2007 we completed the acquisition of the stock of Rain Master Irrigation Systems, Inc. The benefits of an acquisition or new alliance, joint venture, or partnership may take more time than expected to develop or integrate into our operations, and we cannot guarantee that our Hayter acquisition, our Rain Master acquisition,previous or any future acquisitions, alliances, or joint ventures, or partnerships will in fact produce any benefits. In addition, acquisitions, alliances, joint ventures, and partnerships involve a number of risks, including:

·

diversion of management’smanagement's attention;

·


difficulties in integrating and assimilating the operations and products of an acquired business or in realizing projected efficiencies, cost savings, and synergies;

·

potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired businesses or adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;

·

adverse impact on overall profitability if acquired businesses do not achieve the financial results projected in our valuation models;

·

reallocation of amounts of capital from other operating initiatives and/or an increase in our leverage and debt service requirements to pay the acquisition purchase prices, which could in turn restrict our ability to access additional capital when needed or to pursue other important elements of our business strategy;

·

inaccurate assessment of undisclosed, contingent or other liabilities or problems, unanticipated costs associated with an acquisition, and an inability to recover or manage such liabilities and costs; and

·

incorrect estimates made in the accounting for acquisitions, incurrence of non-recurring charges, and write-off of significant amounts of goodwill or other assets that could adversely affect our operating results.

Our ability to grow through acquisitions will depend, in part, on the availability of suitable acquisition candidates at an acceptable price,prices, terms, and conditions, our ability to compete effectively for these acquisition candidates, and the availability of capital and personnel to complete such acquisitions and run the acquired business effectively. These risks could be heightened if we complete a large acquisition or severalmultiple acquisitions within a relatively short period of time. In addition, some acquisitions may require the consent of the lenders under our credit agreements. We cannot predict whether such approvals would be forthcoming or the terms on which the lenders would approve such acquisitions. Any potential acquisition could impair our operating results, and any large acquisition could impair our financial condition, among other things.

As a result of our financing joint venture with TCFIF, we are dependent upon the joint venture to provide competitive inventory financing programs, including floor plan and open account receivable financing, to certain distributors and dealers of our products. Any material change in the availability or terms of credit offered to our customers by the joint venture, any termination or disruption of our joint venture relationship or any delay in securing replacement credit sources could adversely affect our net sales and operating results.

In 2009, we established a financing joint venture with TCFIF for the purpose of providing reliable, competitive financing to our distributors and dealers in the U.S. and to select distributors of our products in Canada to support their businesses and increase our net sales, as well as to free up our working capital for our other strategic purposes. As a result, we are now dependent upon the joint venture for our inventory financing programs, including floor plan and open account receivable financing. Additionally, we are dependent upon TCFCFC to provide inventory financing to dealers of our products in Canada.

   The availability of financing from our joint venture or otherwise will be affected by many factors, including, among others, the overall credit markets, the credit worthiness of our dealers and distributors, and regulations that may affect TCFIF, as the majority owner of the joint venture and a subsidiary of TCF National Bank, a national banking association. Any material change in the availability or terms of credit offered to our customers by the joint venture, any termination or disruption of our joint venture relationship or any delay in securing replacement credit sources could adversely affect our sales and operating results.

We rely on our management information systems for inventory management, distribution, and other functions. If our information systems fail to adequately perform these functions or if we experience an interruption in their operation, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our management information systems. We rely on our management information systems to effectively manage accounting and financial functions, manageand manufacturing and supply chain processes, and to maintain our research and development data. The failure of our management information systems to perform properly could disrupt our business and product development and could result in decreased sales, increased overhead costs, excess or obsolete inventory, and product shortages, causing our business and operating results to suffer. In addition, our management information systems, including our computer systems, Internet web sites, telecommunications, and data networks, are vulnerable to damage or interruption from natural or man-made disasters, terrorist attacks and attacks by computer viruses or hackers, or power loss. Any such interruption could adversely affect our business and operating results.


A significant portion of our net sales are financed by third parties. Some Toro dealers and Exmark distributors and dealers finance their inventories with third party financing sources. The termination of our agreements with these third parties, any material change to the terms of our agreements with these third parties or in the availability or terms of credit offered to our customers by these third parties, or any delay in securing replacement credit sources, could adversely affect our sales and operating results.

Some Toro and Lawn-Boy dealers and Exmark distributors and dealers generally finance their inventories with third party financing companies. These third party financing companies purchase select receivables from us and our distributors and dealers for extended periods that assist our distributors and dealers in carrying representative inventories of our products. We also have agreements with third party financing companies to provide financing options to golf course and sports fields and grounds equipment customers and micro-irrigation customers in North America and Europe. The purpose of these agreements is to increase our net sales by giving buyers of our products alternative financing options when purchasing our products. We also have an agreement with a third party financing company to provide financing programs under a private label program offered primarily to Toro, Lawn-Boy, and Exmark dealers that provides our end-user customers a revolving line of credit for Toro and Exmark products, parts, and services. Termination of our agreements with these third parties, any material change to the terms of our agreements with these third parties or in the availability or terms of credit for our customers from these third parties, or any delay in securing replacement credit sources, could adversely affect our operating results.

Our reliance upon patents, trademark laws, and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient to protect our intellectual property from others who may sell similar products. Our products may infringe the proprietary rights of others.

We hold patents relating to various aspects of our products and believe that proprietary technical know-how is important to our business generally, as well as to many of our products.business. Proprietary rights relating to our products are protected from unauthorized use by third parties only to the extent that they are



covered by valid and enforceable patents or are maintained in confidence as trade secrets. We cannot be certain that we will be issued any patents from any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us or that the claims allowed under any issued patents will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. In the absence of enforceable patent protection, we may be vulnerable to competitors who attempt to copy our products or gain access to our trade secrets and know-how. Our competitorsOthers may initiate litigation to challenge the validity of our patents, or allege that we infringe their patents, or they may use their resources to design comparable products that do not infringe our patents. We may incur substantial costs if our competitors initiate litigation to challenge the validity of our patents, or allege that we infringe their patents, or if we initiate any proceedings to protect our proprietary rights, and ifrights. If the outcome of any such litigation is unfavorable to us, our business, consolidated operating results, and consolidated financial condition could be adversely affected. We also cannot be certain that our products or technologies have not infringed or will not infringe the proprietary rights of others. Any such infringement could cause third parties, including our competitors, to bring claims against us, resulting in significant costs, possible damages and substantial uncertainty. We could also be forced to develop an alternative whichthat could be costly and time-consuming, or acquire a license, which we might not be able to do on terms favorable to us, or at all. For example, we are currently a defendant in an action in which Textron Innovations, Inc. is alleging that we willfully infringe certain claims of three patents by selling our Groundsmaster® commercial mowers. Textron Innovations, Inc. seeks damages for past sales and an injunction against future infringement. This litigation is currently stayed, as reexamination proceedings are pending in the USPTO. For additional information regarding this lawsuit, see Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” of this report.

   We continue to evaluate this lawsuit and are unable to reasonably estimate the likelihood of loss or the amount or range of potential loss that could result from the litigation.

In addition, wealso rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. Even if these confidentiality agreements are not breached, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors.

Our business, properties, and products are subject to governmental regulation with which compliance may require us to incur expenses or modify our products or operations and non-compliance may expose us to penalties for non-compliance.penalties. Governmental regulation may also adversely affect the demand for some of our products and our operating results.

Our business, properties, and products are subject to a wide variety ofnumerous international, federal, state, and localother governmental laws, rules, and regulations relating to, among other things; climate change,change; emissions to air and discharges to water,water; product and associated packaging; import and export compliance, including country of origin certification requirements; worker and product user health and safety,safety; energy efficiency; product life-cycles; and the generation, use, handling, labeling, collection, management, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of hazardous substances, wastes, and other regulated materials. TheseAlthough we believe that we are in substantial compliance with currently applicable laws, rules, and regulations, we are unable to predict the ultimate impact of adopted or future laws, rules, and regulations on our business, properties, or products. Any of these laws, rules, or regulations may cause us to incur significant expenses to achieve or maintain compliance, require us to modify our products, adversely affect the price of or demand for some of our products, and ultimately affect the way we conduct our operations, and the failureoperations. Failure to comply


with any of these laws, rules, or regulations could lead to fines and other penalties.penalties, including restrictions on the importation of our products into, and the sale of our products in, one or more jurisdictions until compliance is achieved.

   The EPA has adopted increasingly stringent engine emission regulations, including Tier 4 emission requirements that beginning in 2012 are applicable to diesel engines in a specified horsepower range that are used in certain of our products. Although we are developing plans to achieve substantial compliance with Tier 4 requirements, these plans will be subject to many variables and if we are unable to successfully execute such plans our ability to sell our products into the market may be inhibited, which could adversely affect our competitive position and financial results. Additionally, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur research, development and engineering costs to design Tier 4 compliant products. The extent to which we are able to pass along to our customers these costs in the form of price increases may adversely affect market demand for our products and/or our profit margins, which may adversely affect our financial results.

   Because we own and lease real property, various environmental laws also may impose liability on us for the costs of cleaning up and responding to hazardous substances that may have been released on our property, including releases unknown to us. These environmental laws and regulations also could require us to pay for environmental remediation and response costs at third-party locations where we disposed of or recycled hazardous substances. We are currently involved in the evaluation and clean-up of a limited number of properties we either currently or previously owned. Although we do not expect that these current matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or operating results, our future costs of complying with the various environmental requirements, as they now exist or may be altered in the future, could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. We are also subject to other international, federal and state laws, rules and regulations, the future non-compliance with which may harm our business or may adversely affect the demand for some of our products. For example, our residential products are subject to various United States statutes designed to protect consumers and are subject to the administrative jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The EPA and CARB adopted emissions regulations setting maximum emission standards for certain off-road equipment. The EU also adopted environmental directives that mandate the labeling, collection, and disposal of electrical and electronic equipment and bans the sale of electrical and electronic equipment containing certain, or certain levels of, hazardous substances.

   In addition, governmental restrictions placed on water usage as well as water availability may adversely affect demand for our irrigation products. Changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards, taxation changes, including tax rate changes, new tax laws, and revised tax law interpretations, also may adversely affect our operating results.

Legislative enactments could impact the competitive landscape within our markets and affect demand for our products.

Various legislative proposals, if enacted, could put us in a competitively advantaged or disadvantaged position and affect customer



demand for our products relative to the product offerings of our competitors. For example, any fiscal-stimulus or other legislative enactment that impacts the lawn and garden, outdoor power equipment, or irrigation industries generally by promoting the purchase, such as through customer rebate or other incentive programs, of certain types of mowing or irrigation equipment or other products that we sell, could impact us positively or negatively, depending on whether we manufacture products that meet the specified legislative criteria, including in areas such as fuel efficiency, alternative energy or water usage, or if, as a result of such legislation, customers perceive our product offerings to be relatively more or less attractive than our competitors' product offerings. We cannot currently predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, what any such legislation's specific terms and conditions would encompass, how any such legislation would impact the competitive landscape within our markets, or how, if at all, any such legislation might ultimately affect customer demand for our products or our operating results.

We are subject to product liability claims, product quality issues, and other litigation from time to time that could adversely affect our operating results or financial condition.

The manufacture, sale, and usage of our products expose us to significant risk ofrisks associated with product liability claims. If a product liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of our insurance coverage, and it is ultimately determined that we are liable, our business could suffer. While we instruct our customers on the proper usage of our products, we cannot ensure that they will implement our instructions accurately or completely. If our products are defective or used incorrectly by our customers, injury may result and this could give rise to product liability claims against us.us or adversely affect our brand image or reputation. Any losses that we may suffer from any liability claims, and the effect that any product liability litigation may have upon the reputation and marketability of our products, may divert management’s attention from other matters and may have a negative impact on our business and operating results. Some of our products or product improvements were developed relatively recently and defects or risks that we have not yet identified may give rise to product liability claims. Additionally, we could experience a material design or manufacturing failure in our products, a quality system failure, other safety issues, or heightened regulatory scrutiny that could warrant a recall of some of our products. A recall of some of our products could also result in increased product liability claims. Unforeseen product quality problems in the development and production of new and existing products could also result in loss of market share, reduced sales, and higher warranty expense.

We are also subject to other litigation from time to time that could adversely affect our operating results or financial condition. For example, we are currently one of ninecondition, including without limitation the pending litigation against us and other defendants in a purported class action in which the plaintiffs are allegingit is alleged that the horsepower labels on the products the plaintiffs purchased were inaccurate. The amended complaint asserts violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and statutory and common law claims arising from the laws of 48 states. The amended complaint seeks an injunction, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, treble damages under the RICO Act, and attorneys’ fees. For additional information regarding this lawsuit, see Part III,Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under the heading "Litigation" included in Item I, “Legal Proceedings”8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Date of this report. Even if the plaintiffs’ claims are found to be without merit, we have incurred and may continue to incur substantial costs in defending the lawsuit. The lawsuit could divert the time and attention of our management and could result in adverse publicity, either of which could significantly harm our operating results and financial condition. Although we are currently unable to assess whether the litigation would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results or financial condition, any adverse determination in the litigation might result in material liability, which could adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.

If we are unable to retain our key employees and attract and retain other qualified personnel, we may not be able to meet strategic objectives and our business could suffer.

Our ability to meet our strategic objectives and otherwise grow our business will depend to a significant extent on the continued contributions of our senior managementleadership team. Our future success will also depend in large part on our ability to identify, attract, and retain other highly qualified managerial, technical, sales and marketing, and customer service personnel. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we may not succeed in identifying, attracting, or retaining qualified personnel. The loss or interruption of services of any of our key personnel, the inability to identify, attract, or retain qualified


personnel in the future, delays in hiring qualified personnel, or any employee work slowdowns, strikes, or similar actions could make it difficult for us to conduct and manage our business and meet key objectives, which could harm our business, financial condition, and operating results.

The terms of our credit arrangements and the indentures governing our senior notes and debentures could limit our ability to conduct our business, take advantage of business opportunities and respond to changing business, market, and economic conditions. Additionally, we are subject to counterparty risk in our credit arrangements.

Our credit arrangements and the indentures governing our 6.625% senior notes and 7.800% debentures include a number of financial and operating restrictions. For example, our credit arrangements contain financial covenants that, among other things, require us to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum debt to total capitalizationearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ratio. Our credit arrangements and/or indentures also contain provisions that restrict our ability, subject to specified exceptions, to, among other things:

·

make loans or investments, including acquisitions;

·

create liens or other encumbrances on our assets;

·

sell assets;

·

engage in mergers or consolidations; and

·

pay dividends that are significantly higher than those currently being paid, make other distributions to our stockholdersshareholders or redeem shares of our common stock.


These provisions may limit our ability to conduct our business, take advantage of business opportunities, and respond to changing business, market, and economic conditions. In addition, they may place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to other companies that may be subject to fewer, if any, restrictions or may otherwise adversely affect our business. Transactions that we may view as important opportunities, such as significant acquisitions, may be subject to the consent of the lenders under our credit arrangements, which consent may be withheld or granted subject to conditions specified at the time that may affect the attractiveness or viability of the transaction.

   The overall availability of credit continues to be limited. Although our $175 million revolving credit facility does not expire until January 2012, market deterioration or other factors could jeopardize the counterparty obligations of one or more of the banks participating in our facility, which could have an adverse effect on our business if we are not able to replace such credit facility or find other sources of liquidity on acceptable terms. In addition, we intend to amend or replace our revolving credit facility prior to its expiration in January 2012. Our ability to amend or replace this facility and to obtain any other additional financing we may need for acquisitions or other general business purposes, and the terms thereof, will depend on our operating and financial performance and is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We may not ultimately be able to refinance, amend or otherwise replace our revolving credit facility at all or on terms that we believe are commercially reasonable.

If we are unable to comply with the terms of our credit arrangements and indentures, especially the financial covenants, our credit arrangements could be terminated and our senior notes and debentures could become due and payable.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with all of the terms of our credit arrangements and indentures, especially the financial covenants. Our ability to comply with such terms depends on the success of our business and our operating results. Various risks, uncertainties, and events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with the terms of our credit arrangements and/or indentures. If we were out of compliance with any covenant required by our credit arrangements following any applicable cure periods, the banks could terminate their commitments unless we could negotiate a covenant waiver. The banks could condition such waiver fromon amendments to the banks.terms of our credit arrangements that may be unfavorable to us. In addition, our 6.625% senior notes and 7.800% debentures could become due and payable if we were unable to obtain a covenant waiver or refinance our medium-term debt under our credit arrangements. If our credit rating falls below investment grade, the interest rate we currently pay on outstanding debt under our credit arrangements could increase, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business is subject to a number of other miscellaneous risks that may adversely affect our operating results, financial condition, or business.

Other miscellaneous risks that could affect our business include:

·

natural or man-made disasters or global pandemics, which may result in shortages of raw materials and components, higher fuel costs, and increase in insurance premiums;

·

financial viability of distributors and dealers, changes in distributor ownership, changes in channel distribution of our products, relationships with our distribution channel partners, our success in partnering with new dealers, and our customers’customers' ability to pay amounts owed to us; and

·

a decline in retail sales or financial difficulties of our distributors or dealers, which could cause us to repurchase financed product;
termination or material change to the terms of our end-user financing arrangements, availability of credit for our customers, including any delay in securing replacement credit sources, or significant financed product repurchase requirements, which could have a material adverse impact on our future operating results.
continued threat of terrorist acts and war, which may result in heightened security and higher costs for import and export shipments of components or finished goods, reduced leisure travel, and contraction of the U.S. and worldwide economies.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


17




item 2.PropertieS

ITEM 2.   PROPERTIES

As of October 31, 2007,2010, we utilized manufacturing, distribution, warehouse, and office facilities totaling approximately 5.85.6 million square feet of space.space worldwide. We also utilizehad approximately 2072 acres of excess land in California asWisconsin adjacent to a testing facility, 16 acres of land in Nebraska as a parking lot and testing facility, anddistribution center, 36 acres of land in Minnesota utilized as a testing and storage facility, 15 acres of land in Minnesota held for future expansion, 21 acres of land in California used as a testing site, and approximately 9 acres of buildable land in Eastern Europe, the planned future site for a micro-irrigation manufacturing facility. Plant utilization varies during the year depending on the production cycle. We consider each of our current facilities in use to be in good operating condition and adequate for its present use.condition. Management believes we have sufficient manufacturing capacity for fiscal 2008. The following schedule outlines our2011 after taking into account the aforementioned manufacturing facility in Eastern Europe expected to open in fiscal 2011. Our significant facilities are listed below by location, ownership, and function as of October 31, 2007:2010:

Location


Ownership


Products Manufactured / Use


Bloomington, MN

Owned/Leased

Corporate headquarters, warehouse, and test facility

El Paso, TX

Owned/Leased

Components for professional and residential products, and distribution center

Plymouth, WI

Owned

Professional and residential parts distribution center

Juarez, Mexico

Leased

Professional and residential products

Tomah, WI

Owned/Leased

Professional products and warehouse

distribution center

Windom, MN

Owned/Leased

Residential and professional products, and warehouse

Baraboo, WI

Beatrice, NE

Owned/Leased

Professional and residentialproducts, test facility, distribution center,

and office

Beatrice, NE

Riverside, CA

Owned/Leased

Professional products, office,test facility, distribution center, and test facility

office

Riverside, CA

Lakeville, MN

Owned/Leased

OfficeResidential and test facility

professional distribution center

Lakeville, MN

Leased

Residential distribution center

Lincoln, NE

Leased

Professional distribution center

Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Owned

Professional and residential products, and distribution center, test lab, and office

Shakopee, MN

Owned

Components for professional and residential products

Braeside, Australia

Leased

Distribution facility

center

El Cajon, CA

Owned/LeasedProfessional and residential products, distribution center, test lab, and office
Brooklyn Center, MNLeasedDistribution facility, service area, and office
St. Louis, MOLeasedDistribution facility and office
Sanford, FLLeasedProfessional products
Fiano Romano, ItalyOwnedProfessional products, warehouse, and office
Beverley, Australia

Owned

Professional products, office, and distribution center

El Cajon, CA

Capena, Italy

Owned/Leased

ProfessionalDistribution center

Oevel, BelgiumOwnedDistribution center and residentialoffice
Kent, WALeasedDistribution facility, service area, and office
Abilene, TXLeasedOffice, professional products, and distributionservice center office

Brooklyn Center, MN

Leased

Distribution facility and office

Capena, Italy

Leased

Distribution facility

Oevel, Belgium

Owned

Distribution facility and office

Hazelwood, MO

Leased

Distribution facility and office

Sanford, FL

Leased

Professional products and distribution center

Franklin Park, IL

Leased

Distribution facility


Item 3.Legal ProceedingS ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

General

We are a party to litigation in the ordinary course of business. Litigation occasionally involves claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages arising out of the use of our products. Although we are self-insured to some extent, we maintain insurance against certain product liability losses. We are also subject to administrative proceedings with respect to claims involving the discharge of hazardous substances into the environment. Some of these claims assert damages and liability for remedial investigations and clean up costs. We are also typically involved in commercial disputes, employment disputes, and patent litigation cases in the ordinary course of business. To prevent possible infringement of our patents by others, we periodically review competitors’competitors' products. To avoid potential liability with respect to others’others' patents, we regularly review certain patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)USPTO and foreign patent offices. We believe these activities help us minimize our risk of being a defendant in patent infringement litigation. We are currently involved in patent litigation cases both where we are asserting patents and where we are defending against chargespatent infringement.

   For a description of infringement. While the ultimate resultsour material legal proceedings, see Note 13 of the current cases are unknown at this time, we believe that the outcome of these cases is unlikelyNotes to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

On June 3, 2004, eight individuals who claim to have purchased lawnmowers in Illinois and Minnesota filed a lawsuit in Illinois state court against the company and eight other defendants alleging that the horsepower labels on the products the plaintiffs purchased were inaccurate. On May 17, 2006, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to add 84 additional plaintiffs and an engine manufacturer as an additional defendant. The amended complaint asserts violations of the federal RICO Act and statutory and common law claims arising from the laws of 48 states. The plaintiffs seek certification of a class of all persons in the United States who, beginning January 1, 1994 through the present, purchased a lawnmower containing a two-stroke or four-stroke gas combustible engine up to 30 horsepower that was manufactured or sold by the defendants. The amended complaint seeks an injunction, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, treble damagesConsolidated Financial Statements under the RICO Act,heading "Litigation" included in Item 8, Financial Statements and attorneys’ fees. In late May 2006, the case was removed to Federal court in the Southern DistrictSupplementary Data of Illinois. Onthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated into this Item 3 by reference.

ITEM 4.   (REMOVED AND RESERVED)


August 1, 2006, all of the defendants, except MTD Products Inc., filed motions to dismiss the claims in the amended complaint. On August 4, 2006, the plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement with MTD Products Inc. and certification of a settlement class. All remaining non-settling defendants have filed counterclaims against MTD Products Inc. for potential contribution amounts, and MTD Products Inc. has filed cross claims against the non-settling defendants. On December 21, 2006, another defendant, American Honda Motor Company, notified us that it had reached an agreement of settlement with the plaintiffs. On March 30, 2007, the court entered an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, subject to the ability to re-plead certain claims pursuant to a detailed written order to follow. As of the date hereof, the court has not yet entered the detailed written order. We continue to evaluate this lawsuit and are unable to reasonably estimate the likelihood of loss or the amount or range of potential loss that could result from this litigation. Therefore, no accrual has been established for potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. We are also unable to assess at this time whether the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our annual consolidated operating results or financial condition, although an unfavorable resolution could be material to our consolidated operating results for a particular period.

In July 2005, Textron Innovations Inc., the patent holding company of Textron, Inc., filed a lawsuit in Delaware Federal District Court against the company for patent infringement. Textron alleges that we willfully infringe certain claims of three Textron patents by selling our Groundsmaster® commercial mowers. Textron seeks damages for our past sales and an injunction against future infringement. In August and November 2005, we answered the complaint, asserting defenses and counterclaims of non-infringement, invalidity, and equitable estoppel. Following the Court’s order in October 2006 construing the claims of Textron’s patents, discovery in the case was closed in February 2007. In March 2007, following unsuccessful attempts to mediate the case, we filed with the USPTO to have Textron’s patents reexamined. The reexamination proceedings are pending in the USPTO. In April 2007, the Court granted our motion to stay the litigation and, in June 2007, denied Textron’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order staying the proceedings. We continue to evaluate this lawsuit and are unable to reasonably estimate the likelihood of loss or the amount or range of potential loss that could result from the litigation. Therefore, no accrual has been established for potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. While we do not believe that the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, an unfavorable resolution could be material to our consolidated operating results for a particular period.

ITEM 4.            SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The list below identifies those persons designated by our Board of Directors as executive officers"executive officers" of the company, including theircompany. The list sets forth each such person's age and position with the company as of December 14, 2007 and16, 2010, as well as positions held by them duringfor at least the last five years. There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or more years. Officersperson nominated to become a director or executive officer of the company. There are elected byno arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer of the Board of Directors or appointed by the Chief Executive Officer annually. All executive officers listed below are subject to Section 16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.company.

Name, Age, and Position with the Company


Business Experience During the Last Five or More Years


Michael J. Hoffman
52,55, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer

Chairman of the Board since March 2006, Chief Executive Officer since March 2005 and President since October 2004. He also

Judy L. Altmaier
49, Vice President, Operations
Vice President, Operations since October 2009. From January 2009 to October 2009, she served as Chief Operating Officer from October 2004Vice President/General Manager of Operations, Auto Group Americas for Eaton Corporation, a diversified industrial manufacturer. From July 2007 to March 2005. From November 2002 to October 2004, heJanuary 2009, she served as Group Vice President, Consumer, Exmark, Landscape Contractor, and International Businesses.

President/General Manager of Global Engine Valve Division in Turin, Italy for Eaton Corporation. From October 2003 to July 2007, she served as Manufacturing Operations Manager for the Engine Air Management Operations for Eaton Corporation.

William E. Brown, Jr.
46,49, Vice President, ConsumerInternational Business
Vice President, International Business since August 2010. From February 2009 to July 2010, he served as Vice President, Residential and Landscape
Contractor Business – Toro

Businesses. From November 2006 to February 2009, he served as Vice President, Consumer and Landscape Contractor Business – Toro since November 2006.— Toro. From February 2003 to October 2006, he served as Vice President and General Manager, Commercial Business.

Philip A. Burkart
45,48, Vice President, Irrigation Businesses

Business

Vice President, Irrigation BusinessesBusiness since November 2006. From February 2003 to October 2006, he served as Vice President and General Manager, Irrigation Business.

Timothy P. Dordell
45,48, Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel

Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since May 2007. From November 2006 to May 2007, he served as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel. From May 2002 to November 2006, he served as Associate General Counsel-Corporate and Assistant Secretary at Ecolab Inc., a developer and marketer of products and services for the hospitality, foodservice, healthcare, and industrial markets.

Michael D. Drazan
53, Vice President, Contractor Business and
Chief Information Officer
50,
Vice President, Contractor Business and Chief Information Officer since February 2009, which includes responsibility for our Exmark and
Vice President, Sitework Systems businesses and our information services function. In September 2010, he also assumed responsibility for our Micro-Irrigation Business and Corporate Services

Accounts. From November 2007 to February 2009, he served as Chief Information Officer and Vice President, Corporate Services since November 2007.Services. From November 2006 to October 2007, he served as Vice President, Chief Information Officer. From March 2000 to November 2006, he served as Vice President, Corporate Information Services.

Blake M. Grams
43, Vice President, Corporate Controller
40,
Vice President, Corporate Controller since December 2008. From February 2006 to December 2008, he served as Managing Director, Corporate Controller

Managing Director, Corporate Controller since February 2006.Controller. From November 2003 to January 2006, he served as Director, Corporate Finance.

Michael J. Happe
39, Vice President,
Residential and Landscape
Contractor Businesses
Vice President, Residential and Landscape Contractor Businesses since August 2010. From February 2003December 2008 to October 2003,July 2010, he served as Senior Manager, Corporate Finance and Planning.

Michael J. Happe
36, General Manager,
Vice President, Commercial Business

Business. From November 2007 to December 2008, he served as General Manager, Commercial Business since November 2007.Business. From November 2006 to October 2007, he served as Managing Director, Commercial Business. From November 2004 to October 2006, he served as Director of Marketing, International Business.

Thomas J. Larson
53, Vice President, Treasurer
Vice President, Treasurer since December 2008. From April 2002February 2006 to November 2004,December 2008, he served as National Account Manager – The Home Depot for the Consumer Business.

Dennis P. Himan
63, Vice President, Group

Group Vice President, Commercial, Corporate Accounts, Exmark, MTI, International, and Irrigation Businesses sinceTreasurer. From November 2006. From February 2003 to OctoberJanuary 2006, he served as Vice President and General Manager, International Business.

Assistant Treasurer.

Sandra J. Meurlot
59, Vice President, Operations

Vice President, Operations since November 2002.

Karen M. Meyer
57, Vice President, Administration

Vice President, Administration since August 1998. On January 31, 2008, she will retire as an employee of The Toro Company.

Peter M. Ramstad
50,53, Vice President, Human Resources and
Business Development

Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development since November 2007. From November 2006 to OctoberNovember 2007, he served as Vice President, Business and Strategic Development. From December 2003 to November 2006, he served as Executive Vice President, Strategy and Finance at Personnel Decisions International, a consulting company that helps clients build organizational and talent strategies and assess and develop leaders.

Darren L. Redetzke
46, Vice President,
Commercial Business
Vice President, Commercial Business since August 2010. From April 2001December 2008 to December 2003,July 2010, he served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer at Personnel Decisions International.

Darren L. Redetzke
43, General Manager,
International Business

Business. From November 2007 to December 2008, he served as General Manager, International Business since November 2007.Business. From NovemberOctober 2006 to OctoberNovember 2007, he served as Managing Director, International Business. From November 2004 to October 2006, he served as Director of Marketing  Golf for the Commercial Business. From December 2001 to October 2004, he served as Director of Marketing – Irrigation and Commercial for the International Business.

Richard W. Rodier
47, General Manager, Landscape Contractor
Business – Toro

General Manager, Landscape Contractor Business – Toro since November 2004. From February 2003 to October 2004, he served as Managing Director, Landscape Contractor Business – Toro.

Mark B. Stinson
42, General Manager, Exmark

General Manager, Exmark since November 2004. From February 2003 to October 2004, he served as Managing Director, Exmark.

Stephen P. Wolfe
59,62, Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer since February 2006. From June 1997 to JanuaryFebruary 2006, he served as Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer.

There are no family relationships between any director, executive officer, or person nominated to become a director or executive officer of the company. There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which he or she was selected as an officer of the company.



PART II

ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and issuer purchases of equity securitieS

Toro common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol “TTC.”"TTC." The high, low, and last sales prices for Toro common stock and cash dividends paid for each of the quarterly periods for fiscal 20072010 and 20062009 were as follows:

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2007

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

Market price per share of common stock –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High sales price

 

$

52.00

 

 

$

57.11

 

$

63.69

 

$

61.56

 

Low sales price

 

42.06

 

 

49.20

 

51.17

 

50.73

 

Last sales price

 

51.68

 

 

51.46

 

56.47

 

55.66

 

Cash dividends per share of common stock1

 

0.12

 

 

0.12

 

0.12

 

0.12

 

  

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2010

  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
  

Market price per share of common stock –

             
  

High sales price

 $43.91 $57.50 $58.50 $58.00 
  

Low sales price

  36.47  37.50  46.32  48.39 
  

Last sales price

  38.95  56.94  52.05  56.76 

Cash dividends per share of common stock1

  0.18  0.18  0.18  0.18 
  


Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2006

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

Market price per share of common stock –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High sales price

 

$

46.78

 

 

$

52.52

 

$

50.71

 

$

45.00

 

Low sales price

 

36.30

 

 

43.00

 

40.50

 

37.77

 

Last sales price

 

43.19

 

 

50.06

 

42.30

 

43.16

 

Cash dividends per share of common stock1

 

0.09

 

 

0.09

 

0.09

 

0.09

 

  

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2009

  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
  

Market price per share of common stock –

             
  

High sales price

 $36.55 $31.66 $36.18 $42.03 
  

Low sales price

  24.80  20.26  26.57  34.06 
  

Last sales price

  29.61  29.75  34.66  37.02 

Cash dividends per share of common stock1

  0.15  0.15  0.15  0.15 
  

1
Future cash dividends will depend upon the company’scompany's financial condition, capital requirements, results of operations, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

Common Stock100,000,000 shares authorized, $1.00 par value, 37,950,83131,394,942 and 40,355,71433,369,486 shares outstanding as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.

Preferred Stock1,000,000 voting shares authorized and 850,000 non-voting shares authorized, $1.00 par value, no shares outstanding.

ShareholdersStockholdersAs of December 13, 2007,16, 2010, Toro had approximately 4,359 stockholders4,074 shareholders of record.

Purchases of Equity SecuritiesThe following table sets forth information with respect to shares of Toro common stock purchased by the company during each of the three fiscal months in the period ended October 31, 2007.2010.

Period

 

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
1,2

 

Average
Price
Paid Per
Share

 

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs

 

Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
1,2

 

August 4, 2007 through August 31, 2007

 

 

80,000

 

 

$

55.50

 

 

80,000

 

 

2,966,563

 

September 1, 2007 through September 28, 2007

 

 

951,588

 

 

59.67

 

 

951,588

 

 

2,014,975

 

September 29, 2007 through October 31, 2007

 

 

882,490

3

 

58.18

 

 

880,800

 

 

1,134,175

 

Total

 

 

1,914,078

 

 

$

58.81

 

 

1,912,388

 

 

 

 

  

Period

  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased1
  Average
Price
Paid Per
Share
  Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
  Maximum
Number of
Shares that
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs1
 
  

July 31, 2010 through August 27, 2010

        1,338,150 

August 28, 2010 through October 1, 2010

  8,912  56.96  8,912  1,329,238 

October 2, 2010 through October 31, 2010

  1,2892 57.86    1,329,238 
  

Total

  10,201 $57.07  8,912    
     

1
On July 18, 2006,21, 2009, the company’scompany's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 3,000,0005,000,000 shares of the company’scompany's common stock in open-market or in privately negotiated transactions. This program has no expiration date but may be terminated by the company’scompany's Board of Directors at any time. The company purchased an aggregate of 46,5638,912 shares during the periodsperiod indicated above under this program. There are no shares remaining for repurchase under this program.

2    On May 22, 2007, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional 3,000,000 shares of the company’s common stock in open-market or in privately negotiated transactions. This program has no expiration date but may be terminated by the company’s Board of Directors at any time. The company purchased an aggregate of 1,865,825 shares during the periods indicated above under this program.

3

Includes 1,6901,289 units (shares) of Toro common stock purchased in open-market transactions at an average price of $56.85$57.86 per share on behalf of a rabbi trust formed to pay benefit obligations of the company to participants in deferred compensation plans. These 1,6901,289 shares were not repurchased under the company’scompany's repurchase programs,program, as described in footnotesfootnote 1 and 2 above.

On December 1, 2010, the company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 3,000,000 shares of its common stock in open-market or privately negotiated transactions. This repurchase authorization has no expiration date but may be terminated by the company's Board of Directors at any time.



The Toro Company Common Stock Comparative Performance Graph

The information contained in The Toro Company Common Stock Comparative Performance Graph section shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material”"soliciting material" or “filed”"filed" or incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, except to the extent that we specifically request that it be treated as soliciting material or incorporate it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act.

The following graph and table depict the cumulative total stockholdershareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on $100 invested in each of Toro Common Stock,common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and an industry peer indexgroup for the five year period from October 31, 20022005 through October 31, 2007.2010.

 

Fiscal year ending October 31

 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

 

10/02

 

10/03

 

10/04

 

10/05

 

10/06

 

10/07

 

 

The Toro Company

 

100.00

 

156.63

 

215.96

 

232.43

 

276.97

 

359.65

 

 $100.00 $119.16 $155.05 $95.02 $106.60 $165.81 

S&P 500

 

100.00

 

120.80

 

132.18

 

143.71

 

167.19

 

191.54

 

 100.00 116.34 133.28 85.17 93.52 108.97 

Peer Group

 

100.00

 

139.07

 

164.08

 

180.17

 

223.69

 

299.32

 

 100.00 125.29 170.11 89.66 120.77 164.57 
 

The industry peer indexgroup is based on the companies previously included in the Fortune 500 Industrial and Farm Equipment Index, forwhich was discontinued after 2002 the most recent year available, including:and includes: AGCO Corporation, The Alpine Group, American Standard Companies, Inc., The Black & Decker Corporation, Briggs & Stratton Corporation, Caterpillar Inc., Crane Co., Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Deere & Company, Dover Corporation, Flowserve Corporation, General Cable Corporation, Harsco Corporation, Illinois Tool Works Inc., International Game Technology, ITT Industries, Inc., Kennametal Inc., Lennox International Inc., Milacron Inc., NACCO Industries, Inc., Pall Corporation, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pentair, Inc., Snap-On Incorporated, The Shaw Group Inc., Tecumseh Products Company, Teleflex, Terex Corporation, The Timken Company, and Walter Industries Inc. Companies removed from the Index were Unova, Inc., York International Corporation, and Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.

Publication of the Fortune 500 Industrial and Farm Equipment Index was discontinued after 2002. Management believes, however, that the companies in the index continue to provide a good representation of our peer issuers on an industry basis and have continued to use the group to provide continuity.

22





ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

20051

 

2004

 

2003

 

OPERATING RESULTS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,876,904

 

$

1,835,991

 

$

1,779,387

 

$

1,652,508

 

$

1,496,588

 

Net sales growth from prior year

 

2.2

%

3.2

%

7.7

%

10.4

%

7.0

%

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales

 

36.1

%

35.0

%

34.6

%

35.9

%

35.8

%

Selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales

 

24.2

%

24.0

%

24.3

%

25.9

%

27.3

%

Earnings from operations

 

$

223,649

 

$

202,876

 

$

182,726

 

$

165,225

 

$

126,994

 

Interest expense

 

19,445

 

17,672

 

17,733

 

15,523

 

16,285

 

Net earnings

 

142,436

 

129,145

 

114,082

 

102,666

 

81,620

 

As a percentage of net sales

 

7.6

%

7.0

%

6.4

%

6.2

%

5.5

%

Basic net earnings per share2

 

$

3.50

 

$

3.01

 

$

2.55

 

$

2.11

 

$

1.63

 

Diluted net earnings per share2

 

3.40

 

2.91

 

2.45

 

2.02

 

1.56

 

Return on average stockholders’ equity

 

37.4

%

33.0

%

28.1

%

23.5

%

19.8

%

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

950,837

 

$

919,073

 

$

914,860

 

$

929,846

 

$

926,493

 

Average net working capital as a percentage of net sales3

 

29.4

%

29.5

%

30.4

%

30.6

%

34.3

%

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

$

229,209

 

$

175,000

 

$

175,046

 

$

175,091

 

$

178,921

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

370,438

 

392,029

 

390,034

 

420,819

 

451,523

 

Debt-to-capitalization ratio

 

38.3

%

30.9

%

31.0

%

29.5

%

28.6

%

CASH FLOW DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

$

183,574

 

$

190,271

 

$

174,083

 

$

185,149

 

$

115,984

 

Repurchases of Toro common stock

 

182,843

 

146,543

 

156,972

 

169,821

 

18,726

 

Cash dividends per share of Toro common stock2

 

0.48

 

0.36

 

0.24

 

0.12

 

0.12

 

OTHER STATISTICAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market price range –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High sales price2

 

$

63.69

 

$

52.52

 

$

49.02

 

$

35.825

 

$

25.205

 

Low sales price2

 

42.06

 

36.30

 

33.90

 

22.225

 

15.075

 

Average number of employees

 

5,320

 

5,343

 

5,185

 

5,164

 

5,367

 

  

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

                

Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
  

OPERATING RESULTS:

                
 

Net sales

 $1,690,378 $1,523,447 $1,878,184 $1,876,904 $1,835,991 
 

Net sales growth (decline) from prior year

  11.0% (18.9)% 0.1% 2.2% 3.2%
 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales

  34.1% 33.5% 34.8% 36.1% 35.0%
 

Selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales

  25.1% 26.0% 24.2% 24.2% 24.0%
 

Earnings from operations

 $151,266 $115,197 $198,409 $223,649 $202,876 
 

Interest expense

  17,113  17,578  19,333  19,445  17,672 
 

Net earnings

  93,237  62,837  119,651  142,436  129,145 
  

As a percentage of net sales

  5.5% 4.1% 6.4% 7.6% 7.0%
 

Basic net earnings per share

 $2.83 $1.76 $3.17 $3.50 $3.01 
 

Diluted net earnings per share

  2.79  1.73  3.10  3.40  2.91 
 

Return on average stockholders' equity

  31.6% 18.5% 32.6% 37.4% 33.0%

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL POSITION:

                
 

Total assets

 $885,622 $872,682 $932,260 $950,837 $919,073 
 

Average net working capital as a percentage of net sales1

  13.9% 26.2% 27.5% 29.4% 29.5%
 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 $225,548 $228,811 $230,791 $229,209 $175,000 
 

Stockholders' equity

  275,810  315,212  364,675  370,438  392,029 
 

Debt-to-capitalization ratio

  45.1% 42.5% 39.0% 38.3% 30.9%

CASH FLOW DATA:

                
 

Cash provided by operating activities

 $193,507 $251,470 $215,722 $183,574 $190,271 
 

Repurchases of Toro common stock

  135,777  115,283  110,355  182,843  146,543 
 

Cash dividends per share of Toro common stock

  0.72  0.60  0.60  0.48  0.36 

OTHER STATISTICAL DATA:

                
 

Market price range –

                
  

High sales price

 $58.50 $42.03 $59.16 $63.69 $52.52 
  

Low sales price

  36.47  20.26  27.16  42.06  36.30 
 

Average number of employees

  4,607  4,612  5,133  5,320  5,343 
  


1    The company’s consolidated financial statements include results of Hayter Limited from February 8, 2005, date of acquisition.

2    Per share data has been adjusted for all fiscal years presented to reflect two separate two-for-one stock splits effective on March 28, 2005 and April 1, 2003.

3

Average net working capital is defined as monthly average accounts receivable plus inventory less trade payables.


ITEM 7.            MANAGEMENT’S   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)("MD&A") provides material historical and prospective disclosures intended to enable investors and other usersreaders to assess our financial condition and results of operations. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this report. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future performance suggested below.

This MD&A is organized in the following major sections:

·       Overview, Summary of Fiscal 2007 Results, GrowLean Initiative, and Outlook for Fiscal 2008

·       Results of Operations

·       Performance by Business Segment

·       Financial Condition

·       Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

·       Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

OVERVIEW

We design, manufacture, and market professional turf maintenance equipment and services, turf and micro irrigationagricultural micro-irrigation systems, landscaping equipment, and residential yard and snow removal products worldwide. We sell our products worldwide through a network of distributors, dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, mass retailers, and over the Internet, mainly through Internet retailers.Internet. Our businesses are organized into two operatingthree reportable business segments: professionalProfessional, Residential, and residential. A thirdDistribution. Our Distribution segment, called “other”which consists of our company-owned domestic distribution companies anddistributorships, has been combined with our corporate activities including corporate financing activities.and is shown as "Other." Our emphasis is to provide innovative, well-built, dependable, and innovativedependable products supported by an extensive service network. A significant portion of our revenues hashave historically been, and we expect it tothey will continue to be, attributable to new and enhanced products. We define new products as those introduced in the current and previous two fiscal years.

23




Summary of Fiscal 20072010 Results

Fiscal 20072010 was another gooda recovery year with record net sales and double digit diluted net earnings per share growth.after experiencing a difficult year during fiscal 2009. Our fiscal 20072010 results included the following items of significance:

·       Our after-tax return on

Net sales for fiscal 2007 rose2010 increased by 11.0 percent to 7.6 percent$1,690.4 million compared to 7.0 percentfiscal 2009. This increase was primarily attributable to increased demand for our products largely resulting from improved economic conditions in the U.S. and certain international markets where we conduct business, the successful introduction of new products that were well received by customers, and the significant reduction in field inventory levels during fiscal 2009 that was not duplicated in fiscal 2006.

·       Net sales growth for fiscal 2007 was 2.2 percent over fiscal 2006, despite difficult economic and weather conditions.

·       International2010.


Professional segment net sales, continued to grow faster thanwhich represented over 64 percent of our total consolidated net sales with an increase of 9.6in fiscal 2010, grew 12.4 percent to $1,085.5 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2006. Almost half2009 due to strong sales in the golf market and customer acceptance of new products introduced, particularly for landscape contractor equipment.
Our residential segment net sales were also up by 10.7 percent to $589.7 million in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 as a result of continued strong demand for our products and additional product placement for our zero-turn radius riding mowers. Shipments of snow thrower products also increased due to strong demand from heavy snow falls during the winter season of 2009-2010 and the timing of the introduction for our redesigned offering of snow thrower products.
International net sales for fiscal 2010 were up 10.3 percent to $537.6 million compared to fiscal 2009, due to increased demand as a result of new golf development projects, mainly in Asia, additional manufacturing capacity that increased production and sales of our water conserving products for agricultural markets to meet growing worldwide demand, and improved economic conditions in certain international markets resulting in increased demand for our products. Approximately $12 million of this increasenet sales growth was the result of the weakerweakening of the U.S. dollar compared to other currencies in which we transact business. This increase was also attributable to our continued investments in new products, including products designed specifically for international markets and customers, and investments in infrastructure around the world that connects us closer to international customers and increases our global presence. International net sales comprised 29.031.8 percent of our total consolidated net sales in fiscal 20072010 compared to 27.032.0 percent in fiscal 20062009 and 24.832.4 percent in fiscal 2005.

·       Professional segment2008.

Fiscal 2010 net sales, which represents over two-thirds of our total consolidated net sales, increased 3.7earnings rose 48.4 percent in fiscal 2007to $93.2 million compared to fiscal 2006 due primarily to the successful introduction of new products, continued strong growth in the international golf market, and increased worldwide demand and growth in the sports fields and grounds market.

·       Our residential segment net sales were slightly down by 0.6 percent in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006. Sales of our recently introduced redesigned innovative TimeCutter Z Series zero-turning radius riding mowers and enhanced walk power mower products were not enough to offset the decline in snow thrower sales as a result of the lack of snow fall in key markets during the 2006-2007 winter season.

·       Fiscal 2007 net earnings increased 10.3 percent compared to fiscal 2006,2009, and diluted net earnings per share increased 16.861.3 percent over fiscal 2006. This was our 9th consecutive fiscal year of double digit diluted net earnings per share growth before accounting changes.

·       Despite continued commodity cost increases, fiscal 2007 gross margin rose to 36.1 percent$2.79 compared to 35.0fiscal 2009. Our one-year initiative, "5 in One: Back on Course," was successful as we surpassed our goal of five percent profit after tax as a percentage of net sales for fiscal 2010 by achieving 5.5 percent profit after tax as a percentage of net sales.

Gross margin was 34.1 percent in fiscal 2006 due2010, up 60 basis points from 33.5 percent in partfiscal 2009. As we experienced increased demand for our products in fiscal 2010, our manufacturing costs were lower from increased plant utilization, which benefited our gross margin in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. In addition, our gross margin for fiscal 2010 was positively impacted by increased sales of our higher-margin products as compared to fiscal 2009 and continued cost reduction efforts. However, higher commodity prices in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 hindered our gross margin growth rate.
Although selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A") expense was up 7.4 percent in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009, primarily from higher employee incentive compensation related to improved margins on new products, moderate price increases introduced on some products,financial performance, most other SG&A costs were down, reflecting structural cost reductions and continued use of Lean methods to reduce costs, and a weaker U.S. dollar compared to other currencies in which we transact business.

·       Selling, general, and administrativespending discipline. SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales slightly increasedin fiscal 2010 was down to 24.225.1 percent compared to 26.0 percent in fiscal 2007 compared to 24.0 percent in fiscal 2006.

·2009.

We continued to generate strong cash flows from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $183.6 millionplace emphasis on, and take proactive measures related to, reducing working capital and improving asset management. As a result of these efforts, we achieved our long-term goal to reduce average net working capital (accounts receivable plus inventory less trade payables) as a percent of net sales below 20 percent, or "to the teens," in fiscal 20072010. Our average net working capital as a percent of net sales as of the end of fiscal 2010 was 13.9 percent. Our domestic field inventory levels were also slightly down as of the end of fiscal 2010 compared to $190.3 millionthe end of fiscal 2009 due in fiscal 2006, a decreasepart to our continued focus to improve field inventory management.
We continued our history of 3.5 percent.

·       Wepaying cash dividends and we increased our fiscal 20072010 quarterly cash dividend for the third consecutive year.

·       We continued withby 20 percent to $0.18 per share compared to our quarterly cash dividend in fiscal 2009 of $0.15 per share.

Our stock repurchase program inreturned a significant amount of cash to our shareholders during fiscal 2007,2010, which reduced our number of shares outstanding. This reduction resulted in an increase ina benefit to our diluted net earnings per share of approximately $0.19$0.22 per share in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006.

2009.

·       We completed the acquisition of Rain Master Irrigation Systems, Inc. (Rain Master), which broadened our product offering for our Irritrol brand of irrigation products.

·       We issued $125.0 million 30-year senior notes, which were used to pay off higher interest rate debt and for general corporate purposes.

·       Our financial condition remained strong in fiscal 2007 with continued emphasis on asset management. Average inventory levels and average receivable balances increased by 4.3 percent and 0.3 percent, respectively, compared to fiscal 2006. This allowed us to continue to reinvest in product development, brand building, and new technologies; repurchase shares of our stock; fund acquisitions; and increase our cash dividend in fiscal 2007.

GrowLean Initiative

In fiscal 2007, we launched our next-generation “GrowLean” initiative for fiscal years 2007 through 2009. This initiative focuses our efforts more intensely on revenue growth and asset management while maximizing our use of Lean methods to reduce costs and improve quality and efficiency in our manufacturing facilities and corporate offices. We believe we have opportunities to create a leaner, cohesive enterprise that has the potential to deliver sustainable financial performance.

Building a Growth Enterprise. We have identified several strategic focus areas to drive revenue growth in our businesses and accelerate opportunities to expand our global presence through stronger customer relations, acquisitions, alliances, and new partnerships. In order to meet our “GrowLean” initiative goal to grow net sales at an average annual rate of 8 percent or more over the three-year period ending October 31, 2009, we plan to invest in new product development, marketing, distribution, and other strategies to help build market share and strengthen our brands worldwide. At the same time, we plan to pursue targeted acquisitions using a disciplined approach that will add value to our existing brands and product portfolio. We also expect to increase our investment in developing innovative, customer-valued products to generate revenue growth. In the first year of our “GrowLean” initiative, our net sales growth rate was 2.2 percent .

Building a Lean Enterprise. Our continuous improvement journey, which was part of our two previous three-year initiatives, created awareness on our part of the root causes of waste and


inefficiency throughout our entire organization. We believe we now have a strong foundation on which to elevate our internal use of Lean tools while expanding them externally to our suppliers and distribution partners. The profitability goal within our “GrowLean” initiative is to achieve a consistent after-tax return on sales of 7 percent or more over the three-year period ending October 31, 2009. To accomplish this, we plan to continue to employ Lean methods, such as Value Stream Mapping, to identify and eliminate constraints and barriers within and across our businesses and functions. In addition, we plan to fine-tune enterprise-wide systems, such as Design for Manufacturing and Assembly, to deliver products more competitively and efficiently. In the first year of our “GrowLean” initiative, our after-tax return on sales was 7.6 percent.

Improving Asset Management.In our quest to become an integrated Lean enterprise, we are placing additional emphasis on asset management. This is an endeavor that we believe will fundamentally change the way we do business, and we are in the early stages of this journey. Our long-term goal within our “GrowLean” initiative is to reduce average net working capital as a percent of net sales below 20 percent, or in the “teens.” We define net working capital as accounts receivable plus inventory less trade payables. In fiscal 2007, our average net working capital as a percentage of net sales was 29.4 percent.

We have begun to reduce inventory everywhere in the system – within our plants and warehouses as well as at our distributors. Throughout the supply chain, we expect to reduce our costs as more of our products use the same components and we locate and negotiate better supplier agreements to only purchase what we need. In fiscal 2007, we continued to roll-out a pull-based production system that we plan to implement in all of our plants. The pull model is based on customer demand that trigger replenishment cycles throughout the supply chain. As manufacturing is then better synchronized with customer demand, we expect significant inventory reductions at our production facilities, somewhat tempered by the seasonal nature of our business. We expect that our focus on asset management will improve customer satisfaction by delivering the right products to the right distributor or dealer – at just the right time – to meet current demand.

Outlook for Fiscal 20082011

Overall, fiscal 2007 was a good year and we believeWhile worldwide economic uncertainty remains, we are in a position for yet another good yearencouraged by the financial results we achieved in fiscal 2008.2010. We understand the path to economic recovery will occur at different times and at different rates across our markets and the regions of the world in which we compete. As a result, we have taken, and continue to take, proactive measures to manage through this volatile economic environment to ensure we are positioned to drive strong financial results and gain market share throughout the recovery. We believe the key drivers for our anticipated growth in fiscal 20082011 financial performance will include, among many others, thesethe following main factors:

·       International markets will

We intend to continue to be a focus for uson international markets to grow our revenues as werevenues. We plan to continue to investinvesting in new products designed specifically for international markets and customers. Many opportunities exist abroad, especially in infrastructure around the golfworld that will connect us more closely to international customers, increasing our global presence. For example, during fiscal 2011, we plan to open a new facility in Eastern Europe to manufacture micro-irrigation products as we anticipate market demand for our water conserving products to increase in and ouraround that geographic region, which should reduce transportation and other manufacturing costs and increase operating efficiencies. Sales in Australia and Asia were strong in fiscal 2010 and we expect continued growth in fiscal 2011 in those regions of the world. A long-term goal is for international sales to comprise a larger percentage of our total consolidated net sales.

    As we anticipate economic conditions in some international markets to improve, we expect our international sales to increase in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010.

    ·

We anticipate continued successfiscal 2011 net sales in our product innovation effortsprofessional segment to increase compared to those in fiscal 2010, as we expect continued strong demand for our landscape contractor equipment, namely new products that we plan to introduce in fiscal 2011 together with products we introduced within the past two fiscal years, to positively impact our professional segment net sales during fiscal 2011. We also anticipate the golf market to continue to grow and customer acceptancesales of our golf market products to increase in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 as we plan to continue to enhance our product offering for that market with innovative new and improved products, which should drive higher sales. However, we expect governmental budgets to remain tight in fiscal 2011, impacting our sales to municipalities and other governmental units. We anticipate growth in the irrigation market for products that help conserve the use of water, namely for the commercial, residential, and agricultural markets, as the need to become more efficient in water use is expected to drive demand for our products. We plan to invest in new products, manufacturing capacity, and infrastructure globally as products used for water conservation are expected to be a long-term focus for us. Our long-term goal is for water related products to comprise a larger percentage of our total consolidated net sales.
As we anticipate a continued slow economic recovery in fiscal 2011 for residential consumers, we expect our residential segment net sales to slightly increase compared to fiscal 2010. We anticipate our broad array of new riding product offerings to continue to be well received by customers in fiscal 2011.
During fiscal 2011, we anticipate our gross margin rate to slightly increase compared to fiscal 2010. We anticipate average prices for commodities to be higher in fiscal 2011 compared to the average prices paid for commodities in fiscal 2010. We plan to mitigate anticipated higher commodity costs by continuing to aggressively pursue cost reduction efforts.
We expect net earnings and diluted net earnings per share to be up in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010, driven mainly by our expectation of sales growth, leveraging of SG&A expense, and an improvement in our gross margin rate, as well as a reduction in our diluted shares outstanding due to anticipated repurchases of our common stock.
In fiscal 2011, we plan to continue our focus on efficient asset utilization. We anticipate our average net working capital as a percentage of net sales in fiscal 2011 to be relatively even compared to fiscal 2010. Consistent with our focus on asset management, we believe our overalldomestic field inventory levels are within our expectations,currently appropriate and we anticipate field inventory levels for landscape contractor equipment are downto be approximately even as of October 31, 2007the end of fiscal 2011 compared to October 31, 2006.

·       We anticipate growth in our professional segment as we plan to increase our market share by enhancing our product offering with innovative new and improved products. For example, inthe end of fiscal 2008 we plan to increase our product offering of precision irrigation products designed to conserve water usage.

2010.

·       Fiscal 2007 was a challenging year for our residential segment as weather and economic conditions were unfavorable to our business. These conditions continue to be a concern for us as we enter fiscal 2008. However, we are anticipating continued growth in the zero-turning radius riding mower market from the traditional riding tractor mowers and we expect the new products we introduced in fiscal 2007 will continue to be well received by our customers in fiscal 2008.

·       During fiscal 2007, we again experienced rising costs for commodities, and anticipate commodity costs to continue to increase in fiscal 2008. These rising costs are expected to impede our gross margin growth rate in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, as we anticipate that increased worldwide demand and other factors will drive commodity prices higher. We have made significant progress using Lean methods and principles, and we plan to continue this focus as part of our “GrowLean” initiative to offset these rising costs and implement select price increases on some products.

·       Cash flows provided from operations are expected to improve in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 as we plan to continue our focus on improving asset utilization as part of our GrowLean initiative. We intend to reinvest this additional cash generated back into our businesses through investments in product development, brand building, share repurchases, and acquisitions.

We will continue to keep a cautionary eye on the worldglobal economies and the pace and degree of recovery, retail demand, field inventory levels, commodity prices, weather, competitive actions, expenses, and other factors identified in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" of this report, which could cause our actual results to differ from our anticipated outlook.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 20072010 net earnings were $142.4$93.2 million compared to $129.1$62.8 million in fiscal 2006,2009, an increase of 10.348.4 percent. Fiscal 20072010 diluted net earnings per share were $3.40,$2.79, an increase of 16.861.3 percent over $2.91from $1.73 per share in fiscal 2006.2009. The primary factors contributing to the net earnings increaseimprovement were higher net sales volumes, an increase in gross margin, and an increase in gross margins,other income, somewhat offset by higher selling, general, and administrative expenses, and an increase in our effective tax rate.SG&A expenses. In addition, our share repurchase program


resulted in an increase in diluted net earnings per diluted share ofwere benefited by approximately $0.19$0.22 per share in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006.2009 as a result of reduced shares outstanding from repurchases of our common stock.

Fiscal 20062009 net earnings were $129.1$62.8 million compared to $114.1$119.7 million in fiscal 2005, an increase2008, a decrease of 13.247.5 percent. Fiscal 20062009 diluted net earnings per share were $2.91, an increase$1.73, a decrease of 18.844.2 percent over $2.45from $3.10 per share in fiscal 2005.2008. The primary factors contributing to the net earnings increasedecline were higher netlower sales volumes, a decline in gross margin, and an increase in gross margins, improved leveragingother expense, somewhat offset by lower SG&A expenses. However, our net earnings per diluted share were benefited by approximately $0.10 per share in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 as a result of selling, general, and administrative expense, and higher other income, net.reduced shares outstanding from repurchases of our common stock.

The following table summarizes our results of operations as a percentage of our consolidated net sales.

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Net sales

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Cost of sales

 

(63.9

)

(65.0

)

(65.4

)

 (65.9) (66.5) (65.2)
 

Gross margin

 

36.1

 

35.0

 

34.6

 

 34.1 33.5 34.8 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

 

(24.2

)

(24.0

)

(24.3

)

SG&A expense

 (25.1) (26.0) (24.2)

Interest expense

 

(1.0

)

(1.0

)

(1.0

)

 (1.0) (1.1) (1.0)

Other income, net

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

0.3

 

Other income (expense), net

 0.4 (0.1) 0.1 

Provision for income taxes

 

(3.8

)

(3.5

)

(3.2

)

 (2.9) (2.2) (3.3)
 

Net earnings

 

7.6

%

7.0

%

6.4

%

 5.5% 4.1% 6.4%
 

Fiscal 20072010 Compared With Fiscal 20062009

Net Sales.   Worldwide net sales in fiscal 20072010 were $1,876.9$1,690.4 million compared to $1,836.0$1,523.4 million in fiscal 2006,2009, an increase of 2.211.0 percent. NetThis net sales growthimprovement was primarily driven by:

Higher shipments of worldwide professional segment products largely resulting from improved economic conditions, a significant reduction in field inventory levels during fiscal 2009 that was not duplicated during fiscal 2010, the successful introduction of new products that were well received by customers resulting in

An increase in residential segment net sales attributable to continued strong demand, resulting in part from customer acceptance of and additional product placement for zero-turn radius riding mowers. In addition, shipments of snow thrower products were up due to increased demand from heavy snow falls during the winter season of 2009-2010 and the timing of the introduction for our redesigned offering of snow thrower products that grew 9.6 percent as a resultshipped to customers in the first quarter of continuedfiscal 2010 instead of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
International net sales were also up for both our professional and residential segments due also to increased demand primarily from improved economic conditions in our key international markets particularly in the golf market, and the successful introduction of new products.

·       Aproducts that were well received by customers, as well as a weaker average U.S. dollar compared to other worldwide currencies in which we transact business whichthat accounted for approximately $24$12 million of our sales growth.

·       Increased professional segment net sales due to the successful introduction of new products and growth in the sports fields and grounds market.

increase.

SomewhatPartially offsetting those positive factors was:

·       Awas a decline in residential segment net sales primarily from lower shipments of snow thrower productsfor our other segment due to the lackelimination of snow fall in key markets duringToro Credit Company ("TCC"), our wholly owned financing company, floor plan interest costs resulting from the winter seasonestablishment of 2006-2007, which was partially offset by an increase of riding and walk power mower product shipmentsRed Iron Acceptance LLC ("Red Iron"), our financing joint venture with TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. ("TCFIF"), as we introduced new innovative and enhanced products that were well received by consumers.

·       Lower landscape contractor equipment product sales due mainly to efforts to reduce field inventory levels as part of our asset improvement initiative, somewhat offset by the successful introduction of new products.

Looking ahead, we expect ourlower net sales annual growth rate to be higher in fiscal 2008 than in fiscal 2007, driven primarily by the successful introduction of new products and anticipated continued growth inat our international businesses and zero-turning radius riding mower market.wholly owned Midwestern distributorship.

Gross Margin.   Gross margin represents gross profit (net sales less cost of sales) as a percentage of net sales. See Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, in the section entitled Cost"Cost of Sales," for a description of expenses included in cost of sales. Gross margin increased by 1.1 percentage60 basis points to 36.134.1 percent in fiscal 20072010 from 35.033.5 percent in fiscal 2006.2009. This increaseimprovement was mainly the result of the following factors:

·       Increased

A higher proportionate share of professional segment sales of higher-marginthat carry higher average gross margins than residential segment sales.
Lower manufacturing costs from higher plant utilization, mainly related to increased demand for our products.

·       Price increases introduced on some products.

·

Cost reduction efforts including benefits fromimplemented during the past and continuing profit improvement initiatives.

·       A weaker U.S. dollar compared to most other worldwide currencies in which we transact business.

·       A charge for customs duties lasttwo fiscal year that negatively impacted gross margins in fiscal 2006.

years.

Somewhat offsetting those positive factors were:

·       Continued rising commodity costs.

·

Higher manufacturing costs from lower plant utilization as we cut productionaverage prices paid for commodities in an effort to lower inventory levels.

Looking ahead, we expect gross margin for fiscal 20082010 compared to fiscal 20072009.

An increase in our last-in first-out ("LIFO") reserve of $0.6 million in fiscal 2010, as compared to be flat ora reduction in our LIFO reserve in fiscal 2009 that benefited our gross margin by $3.3 million in fiscal 2009.
An increase in freight expense due to slightly improve. We anticipate that price increases and benefits from our ongoing profit improvement initiatives, driven by our emphasis on Lean manufacturing, will in part offset anticipated higher costs of commodities.

fuel prices.

Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expense.SG&A expense increased $14.3$29.3 million, or 3.27.4 percent, from fiscal 2006.2009. See Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, in the section entitled Selling,"Selling, General, and Administrative Expense," for a description of expenses included in SG&A expense. SG&A expense rate represents SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales. SG&A expense rate increased slightlyin fiscal 2010 decreased to 24.225.1 percent compared to 26.0 percent in fiscal 20072009 due to fixed SG&A costs spread over higher sales volumes. The following factors increased our SG&A expense:

An increase of $21.2 million in employee incentive compensation expense as a result of improved financial performance in fiscal 2010, as compared to 24.0 percent in fiscal 2006. The2009.
Higher marketing and warehousing costs of nearly $9 million as a result of increased sales volumes.
An increase in SG&Aproduct liability expense rate was due to the rate of increase$2.5 million as a result of our overall SG&A costs that outpaced our sales growth rate of 2.2 percent as well as the following other factors:

·       Fiscal 2007 self-insurance costs were up because we did not have the same reduction of insurance costs from favorableunfavorable claims experience as in fiscal 2006.

·       Continued increases in investments for engineering.

·       Higher incentive compensation expense.

experience.

Somewhat offsetting those increases were:

·       Lower warranty expense due to a reduction of special warranty provisions for major product modificationswere costs incurred in fiscal 2007, compared to fiscal 2006 in which we incurred special warranty provisions2009 for major product modifications and a product recall.

Looking ahead, SG&A expense is expected to increase, and our SG&A expense rate is expected to remain the same or increase slightlywork force adjustments of $4.3 million that were not duplicated in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, as we expect to continue to increase our investments in engineering, marketing, and information systems.2010.


Interest Expense.   Interest expense for fiscal 2007 increased2010 decreased by 10.02.6 percent compared to fiscal 2006 due to higher2009 as a result of lower average levels of debt and slightly higher average interest rates.levels.

Other Income (Expense), Net.   Other income (expense), net consists mainly of interest income, financing revenue, litigation settlements and recoveries, currency exchange rate gains and losses, equity income and equity losses from investments.investments, and financing revenue. Other income net for fiscal 2007 increased $1.52010 was $7.1 million compared to other expense of $1.8 million in fiscal 2006.2009. This increase in other income, net was due mainly to the following factors:

·       Higher interest income.

·       Lower losses on investments.

Expenses incurred in fiscal 2009 for several legal matters in the aggregate of $6.8 million that were not duplicated in fiscal 2010.
An increase in income from equity investments of nearly $3 million.

Somewhat offsetting those increases were:

·       Lower litigation settlement recoveries compared to those we received in fiscal 2006.

·       Awas a decline in financing revenue.revenue of $1.8 million.

Provision for Income Taxes.   The effective tax rate for fiscal 20072010 was 33.234.0 percent compared to 33.034.4 percent in fiscal 2006.2009. The realization of deferred tax assets is assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded to the extent it is more likely than not that any portion of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due to a valuation allowance recorded in fiscal 2009 of $1.5 million for foreign subsidiaries' net operating loss carry-forwards that was not duplicated in fiscal 2010 and the favorable resolution of a transfer pricing issue. This decrease was somewhat offset by the expiration of the domestic research tax credit on December 31, 2009.

   We anticipate our tax rate for fiscal 2011 to be lower than fiscal 2010 due to the extension of the domestic research tax credit in mid-December 2010.


Fiscal 2009 Compared With Fiscal 2008

Net Sales.   Worldwide net sales in fiscal 2009 were $1,523.4 million compared to $1,878.2 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease of 18.9 percent. This net sales decline was primarily driven by:

Lower shipments of domestic professional segment products largely resulting from the global recession.
A significant decline in international sales due also to reduced demand as a result of recessionary conditions affecting our key international markets, as well as a stronger average U.S. dollar compared to other currencies in which we transact business that accounted for approximately $32 million of our net sales decrease.
A slight decline in residential segment net sales by 1.9 percent in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 primarily attributable to lower demand of riding products as a result of poor economic conditions, despite customer acceptance for our new line of zero-turn radius riding mowers, a decrease in electric blower product sales, and a decrease in sales of snow thrower products due to the timing of the introduction for our redesigned offering of snow thrower products that shipped to customers in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Lower domestic field inventory levels as of the end of fiscal 2009 compared to the end of fiscal 2008 as our shipments decline more than retail demand, as well as improved field inventory management.

Partially offsetting those negative factors were strong shipments of walk power mowers due to additional product placement at a key retailer and a new and broader line of walk power mowers.

Gross Margin.   Gross margin decreased by 130 basis points to 33.5 percent in fiscal 2009 from 34.8 percent in fiscal 2008. This decline was mainly the result of the following factors:

Lower sales of our higher-margin products.
Higher manufacturing costs from lower plant utilization as we cut production to align it with the decline in sales volumes, combined with our ongoing efforts to lower inventory levels.
A stronger average U.S. dollar compared to most other currencies in which we transact business.

Somewhat offsetting those negative factors were:

A reduction in our LIFO reserve of $3.3 million that benefited our gross margin due to a significant decline in our inventory levels.
A decline in freight expense.

Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expense.   SG&A expense decreased $58.5 million, or 12.9 percent, from fiscal 2008. SG&A expense rate in fiscal 2009 increased to 26.0 percent compared to 24.2 percent in fiscal 2008 due to fixed SG&A costs spread over significantly lower sales volumes. The following factors decreased our SG&A expense:

Overall reduced spending in response to the worldwide recessionary economic conditions during fiscal 2009.
A decline in incentive compensation expense of $5.7 million due to lower than planned financial performance in fiscal 2009.

Offsetting those decreases were:

An increase in product liability costs of $5.3 million as a result of unfavorable claims experience.
Higher bad debt expense and costs for distributor changes of $4.0 million.

Interest Expense.   Interest expense for fiscal 2009 decreased by 9.1 percent compared to fiscal 2008 as a result of lower average short-term debt levels and a decline in average interest rates.

Other Income (Expense), Net.   Other expense, net for fiscal 2009 was $1.8 million compared to other income, net of $2.2 million in fiscal 2008. This increase in other expense, net was due mainly to the following factors:

Expenses of $6.8 million in the aggregate for several legal matters.
A decline in financing revenue of $1.5 million.
Lower interest income of $1.0 million.

Somewhat offsetting those increases were foreign currency exchange rate gains in fiscal 2009 of $0.6 million compared to foreign currency exchange losses in fiscal 2008 of $5.0 million.

Provision for Income Taxes.   The effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 34.4 percent compared to 34.0 percent in fiscal 2008. The increase in the effective tax rate was due to a valuation allowance of $1.5 million for foreign subsidiaries' net operating loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets reflecting the unfavorable timing of the phase-out/phase-in provisions of the United States export exclusion compared to the domestic manufacturing deduction, somewhat offset by an increase in benefits related to the domestic research credit in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 as a result of the retroactive extension of this credit by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006.

Looking ahead, the tax rate for fiscal 2008 is expected to be approximately 34.3 percent. This increase is the result of the retroactive extension of the domestic research credit that allowed a residual amount of our domestic research credit generated in fiscal 2006 to be recognized in fiscal 2007, which benefited our fiscal 2007 tax rate.

Fiscal 2006 Compared With Fiscal 2005

Net Sales. Worldwide net sales in fiscal 2006 were $1,836.0 million compared to $1,779.4 million in fiscal 2005, an increase of 3.2 percent. Factoring out the effect of the additional sales from Hayter Limited (Hayter), which we acquired in February 2005, net sales increased 2.8 percent in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005. Net sales growth was primarily driven by:

·       Strong international net sales that grew 12.6 percent as a result of the acquisition of Hayter, as well as increased worldwide demand and new products introduced within the past two years.

·       Select price increases on some products.

·       Increased sales in most of the professional segment markets due to the success of introducing new products, strong retail demand, and growth in the worldwide golf market.

Somewhat offsetting those positive factors was:

·       A decline in domestic residential segment net sales for most product lines primarily as a result of a slow down in consumer spending for outdoor power equipment in the U.S. during the spring/summer season in 2006 and unfavorable weather conditions.

·       Unfavorable currency exchange rates that reduced our net sales by approximately $6.5 million.

Gross Margin. Gross margin increased by 0.4 percentage points to 35.0 percent in fiscal 2006 from 34.6 percent in fiscal 2005.uncertainty over their future realization. This increase was mainlypartially offset by the resulttax impact of the following factors:

·       Price increases introduced on some products.

·       A higher proportionate share of professional segment sales that carry higher average gross margins than residential segment sales.

·       Cost reduction efforts, including benefitsincome from past and continuing profit improvement initiatives.

·       Lower excess and obsolete parts inventory expense.

·       The Hayter acquisition, which negatively impacted gross margins in fiscal 2005, due to the purchase accounting effect of recording the fair value of the inventory acquired as the inventory was sold.

Somewhat offsetting those positive factors were:

·       Continued rising commodity costs, as well as higher freight costs due to higher fuel costs and an increase in demand for transportation.

·       Lower gross margins for a new line of riding products in the residential segment introduced in fiscal 2006.

·       A charge for customs duties.

Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) Expense.SG&A expense increased $7.8 million or 1.8 percent from fiscal 2005. SG&A expense rate decreased to 24.0 percent in fiscal 2006 compared to 24.3 percent in fiscal 2005. The decrease in SG&A expense rate was due primarily to the following factors:

·       A reduction in self-insurance costs due to favorable claims experience.

·       Lower incentive compensation expense due mainly to less favorable financial results for our long-term incentive plans.

·       Leveraging the fixed portion of SG&A costs over higher sales volumes.

Somewhat offsetting those decreases were:

·       Increased investments in engineering, marketing, service, and information systems.

·       Higher warranty expense due mainly to special provisions for major product modifications and a product recall.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for fiscal 2006 slightly decreased by 0.3 percent compared to fiscal 2005 dueforeign jurisdictions subject to lower average levels of short-term debt, which was somewhat offset by higher average interesttax rates.


Other Income, Net. Other income, net for fiscal 2006 increased $2.3 million compared to fiscal 2005. This increase was due mainly to the following factors:

·       Currency exchange rate gains in fiscal 2006 compared to currency exchange rate losses in fiscal 2005.

·       Higher litigation settlement recoveries.

·       A loss on the sale of a business in fiscal 2005.

Provision for Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 remained unchanged at 33.0 percent compared to fiscal 2005.

PERFORMANCE BY BUSINESS SEGMENT

As more fully described in Note 1112 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, we operate in twothree reportable business segments: professionalProfessional, Residential, and residential. A third reportableDistribution. Our Distribution segment, called “other”which consists of our company-owned distributor operations in the United States,domestic distributorships, has been combined with our corporate activities and financing functions.is shown as "Other." Operating earnings for each of our two businessProfessional and Residential segments isare defined as earnings from operations plus other income (expense), net. Operating loss for the “other”Other segment includes earnings (loss) from domestic wholly owned domestic distribution company operations, corporate activities, including corporate financing activities, other income (expense), and interest expense.

The following information provides perspective on our business segments’segments' net sales and operating results.

Professional

Professional segment net sales represented 68 percent, 67 percent, and 64 percent of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 63 percent for fiscal 2009, and 2005, respectively.


68 percent for fiscal 2008. The following table shows the professional segment net sales, operating earnings, and operating earnings as a percent of net sales.

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31

 


2007

 


2006

 

2005

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31
 2010 2009 2008 
 

Net sales

 

$

1,270.5

 

$

1,224.8

 

$

1,145.4

 

Net sales $1,085.5 $965.9 $1,304.1 

% change from prior year

 

3.7

%

6.9

%

11.3

%

% change from prior year 12.4% (25.9)% 0.9%

Operating earnings

 

$

254.2

 

$

227.7

 

$

207.4

 

Operating earnings $173.8 $127.6 $233.4 

As a percent of net sales

 

20.0

%

18.6

%

18.1

%

As a percent of net sales 16.0% 13.2% 17.9%
 

Net Sales.   Worldwide net sales for the professional segment in fiscal 20072010 were up 3.7by 12.4 percent compared to fiscal 20062009 primarily from higher shipments for most domestic and international product categories as a result of improved economic conditions and a significant reduction in field inventory levels during fiscal 2009 that was not duplicated in fiscal 2010. In addition, professional segment sales increased due to the following other factors:

Higher shipments of worldwide golf maintenance equipment and irrigation systems as customers increased capital spending after delayed investments during the past two fiscal years from poor economic conditions and new golf development projects, particularly in Asia, as well as the positive customer response for new products we introduced.
Strong sales of landscape contractor equipment as a result of the following factors:

·       Higher internationalsuccessful introduction of new products that were well received by customers.

Increased net sales as a result of continued strong demand and growthmicro-irrigation products due to our investments in international markets, particularly inadditional manufacturing capacity that increased production of our water conserving products to meet the golfgrowing worldwide market as well as ademand.
A weaker average U.S. dollar compared to themost other worldwide currencies in which we transact business.

·       Strong worldwide demand and growth in the sports fields and grounds markets that resulted in higher equipment product sales.

·       The success of new products introduced within the past two years.

·       Additional sales from the acquisition of Rain Master.

Somewhat offsetting those positive factors were:

·       Lower shipments of landscape contractor equipment due mainly to efforts to reduceOur domestic field inventory levels whichof our professional segment products were lowerslightly down as of the end of fiscal 20072010 as compared to the end of fiscal 2006, moderated by the successful introduction of new products.2009 due to continued field inventory management.

Worldwide net sales for the professional segment in fiscal 20062009 were up 6.9significantly down by 25.9 percent compared to fiscal 2005. Worldwide2008 primarily from lower shipments offor most domestic and international product lines increasedcategories due to decreased demand largely as a result of the successful introductionworldwide recessionary economic conditions during fiscal 2009. Sales of new products and price increases introduced on some products. In addition, strong worldwide demand in the golf and sports fields and grounds markets resulted in highermaintenance equipment and irrigation product sales. International professional segmentsystems declined as customers delayed investments in new equipment at existing golf courses and new golf course construction slowed, and sales of residential/commercial irrigation systems were down as a result of weakness in the housing and commercial construction markets. In addition, landscape contractor equipment net sales decreased, despite the fact that our new products, which included our next generation of zero-turn radius riding mowers and Toro GrandStand® stand-on mowers, were up significantly duewell received by customers. A stronger average U.S. dollar compared to strong demandmost other currencies in which we transact business also negatively impacted our net sales. Our domestic field inventory levels were also down as of the golf market andend of fiscal 2009 as compared to the acquisitionend of Hayter.

Looking ahead, net sales for the professional segment are expected to increase in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 as we expect new products to be well received and to increase our market share, and we anticipate continued growth in international marketsshipments declined more than retail demand, as well as the incremental impact of additional sales from the acquisition of Rain Master.improved field inventory management.

Operating Earnings.Operating earnings for the professional segment in fiscal 20072010 increased 11.636.2 percent compared to fiscal 2006.2009. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, professional segment operating margins increased to 20.0 percent compared to 18.616.0 percent in fiscal 2006.2010 compared to 13.2 percent in fiscal 2009. The following factors impacted professional segment operating earnings:

·

Higher gross margins in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 20062009 as a result of increased sales volumes and lower manufacturing costs from increased plant utilization due to increased sales of higher margindemand for our products, price increases on some products,combined with our continued cost reduction efforts, including benefits from pastefforts. However, increased freight expense driven by higher fuel prices and continuing profit improvement initiatives, and a weaker U.S. dollar compared to most other worldwide currenciesrising commodity prices hampered our professional segment gross margin improvement.
A decline in which we transact business. However, higher manufacturing costs from lower plant utilization somewhat tempered the increase in gross margins and operating earnings.

· SG&A expense rate was higher in fiscal 20072010 compared to 2006fiscal 2009 due mainly to increased investments in engineering and marketing, somewhat offset by a decline in warranty expense.

leveraging SG&A costs over higher sales volumes.

Operating earnings for the professional segment in fiscal 2006 increased 9.82009 decreased 45.3 percent compared to fiscal 2005.2008. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, professional segment operating margins increaseddecreased to 18.613.2 percent in fiscal 20062009 compared to 18.117.9 percent in fiscal 2005.2008. The operating profit improvementdecline was due mainly to higherlower gross margins as a result of cost reduction effortshigher manufacturing costs from profit improvement initiatives, price increases on some products,lower plant utilization as we cut production to align it with the decline in sales volumes, a stronger average U.S. dollar compared to most other currencies in which we transact business, and increased sales of higher margin products, somewhat offset bytooling costs from investments in tools for new products. A higher commodity costs and freight expense. Higher SG&A


expense rate somewhatalso hampered the increase in operating earnings due mainly to higher warranty expense and increased investments for marketing, engineering, and service.

Looking ahead, professional segment operating earnings are anticipated to improve in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 due to expected sales growth, expected improvement in gross margins, and leveraging fixed SG&A expensecosts spread over anticipatedlower sales volumes, as well as higher sales volumes.product liability expense.

Residential

Residential segment net sales represented 30 percent, 31 percent, and 3335 percent of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2007, 2006,2010 and 2005, respectively.fiscal 2009, and 30 percent for fiscal 2008. The following table shows the residential segment net sales, operating earnings, and operating earnings as a percent of net sales.

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31

 


2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31
 2010 2009 2008 
 

Net sales

 

$

563.5

 

$

566.6

 

$

583.3

 

Net sales $589.7 $532.7 $542.9 

% change from prior year

 

(0.6

)%

(2.9

)%

5.2

%

% change from prior year 10.7% (1.9)% 0.3%

Operating earnings

 

$

41.8

 

$

34.1

 

$

50.2

 

Operating earnings $58.0 $46.4 $35.3 

As a percent of net sales

 

7.4

%

6.0

%

8.6

%

As a percent of net sales 9.8% 8.7% 6.5%
 


Net Sales.   Worldwide net sales for the residential segment in fiscal 20072010 were slightly downup by 0.610.7 percent compared to fiscal 20062009 primarily as a result of the following factors:

·       A reduction

Strong shipments of zero-turn radius riding mowers attributable to continued strong demand, resulting in shipmentspart from customer acceptance of new products and additional product placement.
An increase in sales of snow thrower products as a resultdue to increased demand from heavy snow falls during the winter season of 2009-2010 and the timing of the lower levelsintroduction for our redesigned offering of snow fall duringthrower products that shipped to customers in the 2006-2007 winter seasonfirst quarter of fiscal 2010 instead of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
A weaker average U.S. dollar compared to most other currencies in key markets.

·       Lower electric trimmer product shipments due to lost placement at a key retailer.

Somewhat offsetting those negative factors were:

·       Strong worldwide demand of riding products aswhich we introduced our new generation zero-turning radius riding mowers.

transact business.

·       Higher shipments of walk power mowers due to the successful introduction of new and enhanced models.

Worldwide net sales for the residential segment in fiscal 20062009 were slightly down 2.9by 1.9 percent compared to fiscal 2005.2008. This declinedecrease was due primarily to decreased demand primarily resulting from the global recessionary economic conditions, as well as a stronger U.S. dollar compared to most other currencies in which we transact business. Electric blower product sales were also down as a result of lost product placement at a mass retailer, and sales of snow thrower products were lower salesas a result of the timing of the introduction for our redesigned offering of snow thrower products that shipped to customers in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Somewhat offsetting those positive factors were increased shipments of walk power mowers and electric trimmers as a result of weakened domestic economic conditions and lower consumer spending for outdoor power equipment during the spring/summer season in 2006. Snow thrower product sales in the domestic market also decreased as a result of lower levels of snow fall in the U.S. during the 2005-2006 winter season. In addition, retail irrigation product sales sold through the home center distribution channel were down due to unfavorable weather conditions in key domestic markets and lost placement of certain models at a key retailer. However, shipments of riding products increased as we introduced new models and expandedadditional product placement at a key retailer. International residential segment sales also increased due toretailer and a new product introductions, higher snow thrower product shipments due to heavy snow falls in Europe during the 2005-2006 winter season, and strong salesbroader line of Pope products in Australia.

Looking ahead, residential segment net sales are expected to increase in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 primarilywalk power mowers, as a resultwell as positive customer response for our new line of anticipated continued growth in the zero-turningzero-turn radius riding mower market.mowers.

Operating Earnings.Operating earnings for the residential segment in fiscal 20072010 increased 22.725.0 percent compared to fiscal 2006.2009. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, residential segment operating margins roseimproved to 7.4 percent compared to 6.09.8 percent in fiscal 2006.2010 compared to 8.7 percent in fiscal 2009. The following factors impacted residential segment operating earnings:

·       Higher

An improvement in gross margins primarily from increased sales volumes of higher-margin products and the resulting effects of cost reduction efforts. These favorable benefits were somewhat offset by higher commodity costs, an increase in freight expense, and higher manufacturing costs due to operating inefficiencies as a result of improved margins on new products and a weaker U.S. dollar compared to most other worldwide currencieshigher than anticipated customer demand.
An increase in which we transact business. In addition, last year gross margins were hampered by a charge for customs duties.

·       Lower SG&A expense rate due primarily to a decline in warranty expense and lowerfrom higher spending for marketing.

marketing, product liability, incentive compensation, and warehousing costs.

Operating earnings for the residential segment in fiscal 2006 decreased 32.02009 increased 31.3 percent compared to fiscal 2005.2008. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, residential segment operating margins declinedimproved to 6.08.7 percent compared to 8.66.5 percent in fiscal 2005 mainly2008 due to a slight improvement in gross margins and a decline in SG&A expense from lower spending for marketing, engineering, administration, and warehousing costs as a result of lower gross margins due to higher costs for commodities combined with minimal price increases due to competitive conditions, lower margins for riding products introduced in fiscal 2006, higher freight expense, and a charge for customs duties. SG&A expense rate increased as a result of lower sales volumes and an increase in warranty expense for a product recall.budget reductions.

Looking ahead, residential segment operating earnings in fiscal 2008 are expected to improve compared to fiscal 2007 due to anticipated increased sales volumes and an anticipated improvement in gross margins.

Other

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31
 2010 2009 2008 
 

Net sales

 

$

42.9

 

$

44.6

 

$

50.7

 

Net sales $15.2 $24.8 $31.2 

% change from prior year

 

(3.9

)%

(12.1

)%

(26.7

)%

% change from prior year (38.5)% (20.5)% (27.2)%

Operating loss

 

$

(82.8

)

$

(69.0

)

$

(87.3

)

Operating loss $(90.4)$(78.2)$(87.4)
 

Net Sales.Net sales for the otherOther segment includes sales from our wholly owned domestic distribution companies less sales from the professionalProfessional and residentialResidential segments to those distribution companies. In addition,fiscal 2009, the Other segment also included elimination of the professional and residential segments’segments' floor plan interest costs from TCC. With the Toro Credit Company are also includedestablishment of Red Iron beginning in thisfiscal 2010, net sales for the Other segment no longer includes corporate financing activities, including the elimination of floor plan costs from TCC, which results in lower net sales for the other segment. The other segment net sales in fiscal 20072010 decreased 3.938.5 percent compared to fiscal 2006 due mainly to2009 as a result of the elimination of TCC floor plan interest costs, as well as lower net sales at a company-owned distributor.our wholly owned Midwestern distributorship.

29




The other segment net sales in fiscal 20062009 decreased 12.120.5 percent compared to fiscal 20052008 due to lower sales at our company-owned distributorsreduced demand largely resulting from the domestic economic recession, as well as a reduction in the elimination of floor plan interest costs as a result of the changelower receivables with TCC and a reduction in the method of product distribution (to shipping our Exmark product directly to dealers) that impacted the territory served by our Midwestern distributorship.interest rates.

Operating Loss.Operating loss for the other segment in fiscal 20072010 increased by 19.915.7 percent compared to fiscal 2006.2009. This loss increase was primarily the result of last fiscal year’s reductionattributable to an increase in self-insurance costs from favorable claims experience in fiscal 2006, increasedemployee incentive compensation expense lower financing revenue,due to improved financial performance in fiscal 2010, as compared to fiscal 2009, and an increasethe elimination of TCC floor plan costs. Somewhat offsetting those factors was a decline in interest expense.expenses incurred in fiscal 2009 for several legal matters that were not duplicated in fiscal 2010, income from our investment in Red Iron, overall reduced spending from our leaner cost structure as a result of actions we implemented in fiscal 2009, as well as elimination of costs incurred in fiscal 2009 for workforce adjustments.

Operating loss for the other segment in fiscal 20062009 decreased by 20.910.5 percent compared to fiscal 2005.2008. This loss decrease was primarily attributable to overall reduced spending in response to the result of lower incentive compensation expense, a reduction in self-insurance costs, andeconomic downturn, foreign currency exchange rate gains in fiscal 20062009 compared to foreign currency exchange rate losses in fiscal 2005.2008, a decrease in incentive compensation expense, and a decline in interest expense, somewhat offset by expenses for several legal matters, an increase in bad debt expense, and higher costs for distributor changes.


FINANCIAL CONDITION

Working Capital

OurWe have taken proactive measures to improve working capital utilization, including managing our assets, controlling costs, and adjusting production plans. As such, our financial condition remains strong, and we are placing additionalstrong. We continue to place emphasis on asset management, with our GrowLean initiative, with a focus on: (i) ensuring strong profitability of our products and services all the way through the retail sale; (ii)on minimizing the amount of working capital in the supply chain;chain and (iii) maintaining or improving order replenishment and service levels to end users. In connection with the established of Red Iron, our financing joint venture with TCFIF, we sold certain receivables, including floor plan and open account receivables, from most U.S. and Canadian distributors and dealers of our products at a purchase price equal to the face value of the receivables or the purchase price paid for such receivables. Red Iron began financing floor plan receivables in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Red Iron also began financing open account receivables, as well as floor plan receivables previously financed by a third party financing company, during our first quarter of fiscal 2010. The sale of these receivables enables us to use our working capital for strategic purposes, such as research and development of innovative new products, improvements in the quality and performance of existing products, strategic acquisitions and investments, and return value to shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends.

The following table highlights several key measures of our working capital performance.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

 
(Dollars in millions)
Fiscal years ended October 31
 2010 2009 
 

Average cash and cash equivalents

 

$

57.0

 

$

30.4

 

 $175.3 $86.2 

Average receivables, net

 

376.9

 

375.9

 

 174.4 273.6 

Average inventories, net

 

275.3

 

263.9

 

 188.7 213.3 

Average accounts payable

 

100.4

 

98.1

 

 128.3 87.2 

Average days outstanding for receivables

 

73

 

75

 

 38 66 

Average inventory turnover

 

4.35

x

4.52

x

 5.90x 4.75x
 

   

Average net receivables net increased slightlydecreased 36.3 percent in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006 due to higher sales volumes; however,2009, and average days outstanding for receivables decreased to 7338 days in fiscal 20072010 compared to 7566 days in fiscal 2006.2009 due mainly to the sale of our floor plan and open account receivables to Red Iron during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal 2010, respectively. Average net inventories increased by 4.3decreased 11.5 percent in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006,2009, and average inventory turnover declinedimproved by 3.824.2 percent in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006 due to lower2009 as we continued our focus on improving asset management and greater than planned sales volumes in the first halfexpected demand during fiscal 2010. In addition, as part of fiscal 2007, which resulted in production cuts in the second half of fiscal 2007 in an effort to reduce inventory levels.

We expect thatour working capital initiative, average receivables, netaccounts payable increased 47.1 percent in fiscal 2008 to increase2010 compared to fiscal 20072009, driven by our supply chain initiatives and higher levels of production due to higher planned sales volumes, while average inventories, net are expected to slightly declineincreased demand for our products. As a result of the culmination of these efforts, in fiscal 2008 compared2010 we achieved our long-term goal to reduce average net working capital (accounts receivable plus inventory less trade payables) as a percentage of net sales at a level below 20 percent, or "to the teens." Our average net working capital as a percentage of net sales as of the end of fiscal 2007.2010 was 13.9 percent.

   We anticipate bothexpect average receivables to increase slightly and average days outstanding for receivables andin fiscal 2011 to remain flat as compared to fiscal 2010. We anticipate average inventory turnover to improvedecline in fiscal 20082011 compared to fiscal 20072010 as demand exceeded our expectations in fiscal 2010 resulting in lower than average inventory levels. Therefore, we planexpect to continueincrease our effortsaverage inventory levels in fiscal 2011 to improve asset utilization as part ofmeet anticipated higher demand for our GrowLean initiative.products. We also anticipate average accounts payable to increase slightly in fiscal 2011 compared to fiscal 2010 driven by our supply chain initiatives.

Capital Expenditures and
Other Long-Term Assets

Fiscal 20072010 capital expenditures of $42.2$48.7 million were 5.728.4 percent higher compared to fiscal 2006.2009. This increase was primarily attributable to production equipment and tooling expenditures for new products, as well as investments in additional manufacturing capacity that increased production for our water conserving products. Capital expenditures for fiscal 20082011 are anticipated to be approximately $3 to $8$60 million higher than fiscal 2007 as we planexpect to continue to invest in new product tooling, forreplacement production equipment, expansion of our vertical integration capabilities, as well as a new products andmicro-irrigation manufacturing equipment.facility in Eastern Europe.

Long-term assets as of October 31, 20072010 were $285.9$300.6 million compared to $264.9$290.5 million as of October 31, 2006, an2009, a slight increase of 7.93.5 percent. This increase was due mainlyprimarily to the acquisition of Rain Master, which resulted in the addition of $4.3 million of goodwill and $9.5 million of net intangible assets. See Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information.assets from an acquisition.

Capital Structure

The following table details the components of our total capitalization and key ratios.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

 
(Dollars in millions)
October 31
 2010 2009 
 

Short-term debt

 

$

0.4

 

$

0.3

 

 $1.0 $4.5 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

229.2

 

175.0

 

 225.5 228.8 

Stockholders’ equity

 

370.4

 

392.0

 

Stockholders' equity 275.8 315.2 

Debt-to-capitalization ratio

 

38.3

%

30.9

%

 45.1% 42.5%
 

   

Our debt-to-capitalization ratio was higher in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 20062009 due mainly to a decrease in stockholders’stockholders' equity as a resultwe continued to repurchase shares of a higher average price paid per share forour common stock repurchases in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 as well as an increase in long-term debt discussed below.stock.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our businesses are seasonally working capital intensive and require funding for purchases of raw materials used in production, replacement parts inventory, payroll and other administrative costs,


capital expenditures, expansion and upgrading of existing facilities, as well as for financing receivables from customers. We believe that cash generated from operations, together with our fixed rate long-term debt, bank credit lines, and cash on hand, will provide us with adequate liquidity to meet our


anticipated operating requirements. One of the purposes of establishing Red Iron, our previously discussed joint venture with TCFIF is to free up our working capital for strategic purposes, which may include, among other things, research and development of innovative new products, improvements in the quality and performance of existing products, strategic acquisitions and investments, and returning value to shareholders through share repurchases and cash dividends. We believe that the combination of funds available through existing financing arrangements and forecasted cash flows will be sufficient to provide the necessary capital resources for our anticipated working capital needs, capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, debt repayments, quarterly cash dividend payments, and stock repurchases for at least the next twelve months.

On April 26, 2007, we issued $125.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% senior notes due May 1, 2037. The senior notes were priced at 98.513% of par value, and the resulting discount of $1.9 million associated with the issuance of these senior notes is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest rate method. The underwriting fee and direct debt issue costs totaling $1.5 million will be amortized over the life of the notes. Although the coupon rate of the senior notes is 6.625%, the effective interest rate is 6.741% after taking into account the issuance discount. Interest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually, on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The senior notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The indentures under which the senior notes were issued contain customary covenants and event of default provisions. We have the right to redeem some or all of the senior notes at any time at the greater of the full principal amount of the senior notes being redeemed, or the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the treasury rate plus 30 basis points, plus, in both cases, accrued and unpaid interest. In the event of the occurrence of both (i) a change of control of the company and (ii) a downgrade of the notes below an investment grade rating by both Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services within a specified period, we would be required to make an offer to purchase the senior notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the senior notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. We used the proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes to repay $75.0 million outstanding principal amount of 7.125% notes that were due on June 15, 2007 as well as for general corporate purposes.

Cash Dividends

Each quarter in fiscal 2007,2010, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.12$0.18 per share, which was a 3320 percent increase over our cash dividend of $0.09$0.15 per share paid each quarter in fiscal 2006.2009. Our Board of Directors recently increased our first quarter of fiscal 20082011 quarterly cash dividend by 2511 percent to $0.15$0.20 per share from the quarterly cash dividend paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.2010.

Cash Flow

Cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities during the past three fiscal years are shown in the following table.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Cash Provided by (Used in)

 

 Cash Provided by (Used in)  

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Operating activities

 

$

183.6

 

$

190.3

 

$

174.0

 

 $193.5 $251.5 $215.7 

Investing activities

 

(50.3

)

(38.1

)

(68.4

)

 (60.8) (46.0) (51.5)

Financing activities

 

(128.8

)

(138.2

)

(154.4

)

 (142.3) (121.3) (124.0)

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

2.0

 

0.1

 

(0.6

)

 (0.8) 4.2 (2.8)

Net cash provided (used)

 

$

6.5

 

$

14.1

 

$

(49.4

)

 
Net cash (used) provided $(10.4)$88.4 $37.4 
 

Cash and cash equivalents as of fiscal year end

 

$

62.0

 

$

55.5

 

$

41.4

 

 $177.4 $187.8 $99.4 
 

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities.   Our primary source of funds is cash generated from operations. In fiscal 2007,2010, cash provided by operating activities decreased by 3.5$58.0 million, or 23.0 percent, from fiscal 2006.2009. This decrease was due primarily attributable to a declinecash received in accrued liabilities, mainlyfiscal 2009 from a reductionthe initial sale of deferred compensation liability when we electedfloor plan receivables to fund a majority of our deferred compensation plans. Somewhat moderating the declineRed Iron and an increase in cash providedinventory levels, somewhat offset by operating activities was higher net earnings and a larger reductionan increase in accounts receivabletrade payables, all in fiscal 20072010 as compared to fiscal 2006.2009. In fiscal 2010, net earnings accounted for nearly 50 percent of our cash flows from operations, whereas in fiscal 2009, 25 percent of our cash flows from operations was attributable to net earnings.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities.   Capital expenditures and acquisitions are our primary uses of capital resources. These investments have enabled ourare intended to enable sales growth in diverse and new markets helpedand expand existing markets, help us to meet product demand, and increasedincrease our manufacturing efficiencies.efficiencies and capacity. Cash used in investing activities increased 32.1was up 32.3 percent in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 20062009 due mainly to cash utilized for acquisitions and an increase in purchases of property, plant, and equipment in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.and higher amounts of cash used for acquisitions.

Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities.   Cash used in financing activities was lower by 6.8increased 17.3 percent in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006.2009. This declineincrease was primarily attributable to proceeds we received from the issuancehigher levels of 30-year senior notes previously discussed. This decline was somewhat offset by increased repayments of long-term debt, higher cash dividends paid on Toro common stock, and an increase in funds used for repurchases ofto repurchase our common stock in fiscal 20072010 compared to fiscal 2006.2009.

Credit Lines and Other Capital Resources

Our business isbusinesses are seasonal, with accounts receivable balances historically increasing between January and April, as a result of higher sales volumes and extended payment terms made available to our customers and decreasing between May and December when payments are received. The seasonality of production and shipments causes our working capital requirements to fluctuate during the year. Our peak borrowing usually occurs between


January and April. SeasonalAs of October 31, 2010, seasonal cash requirements arewere financed from operations and with short-term financing arrangements, including a $175.0 millionour unsecured senior five-year revolving credit facility whichthat expires in January 2012. Interest expense on this credit linefacility is determined based on a LIBOR rate plus a basis point spread defined in the credit agreement. We had no outstanding short-term debt under this revolving credit facility as of October 31, 2010 and 2009. We intend to amend or replace this credit facility prior to its expiration in January 2012. In addition, our non-U.S. operations maintain unsecured short-term lines of credit in the aggregate amount of approximately $16$19 million. These facilities bear interest at various rates depending on the rates in their respective countries of operation. As of October 31, 2010, we had $0.8 million outstanding short-term debt under these lines of credit. We also have a letter of credit subfacility as part of our credit agreement. Average short-term debt was $48.9 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $43.4 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $5.5 million or 12.9 percent. This increase was primarily attributable to cash used for funding a majority of our deferred compensation plans in fiscal 2007 and additional working capital requirements as a result of higher average receivables and inventory levels, mainly during the first half of fiscal 2007 compared to the first half of fiscal 2006. As of October 31, 2007,2010, we had $190.7$10.4 million of outstanding standby letters of credit. As of October 31, 2010, we had $232.6 million of unutilized availability under our credit agreements.

Significant financial covenants in our credit agreement areduring fiscal 2010 included interest coverage and debt-to-capitalization ratios.

   On November 9, 2010, we amended the terms of our credit agreement for our revolving credit facility to better match our financing needs to our ongoing capital requirements. The amendment included the following changes: (i) replace the debt-to-capitalization covenant with a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") covenant


that shall not exceed 3.25 to 1.00 for any four-quarter period; (ii) remove language that prohibits us from repurchasing our own debt; and (iii) reduce the total amount of the credit line from $225.0 million to $175.0 million. This amendment provides us with more flexibility in the deployment of our capital, while reducing ongoing costs to maintain the amount of credit required for ongoing operations. We were in compliance with all prior and current covenants related to our credit agreement for our revolving credit facility as of October 31, 2007,2010, and we expect to be in compliance with all covenants during fiscal 2008.2011. Our credit agreement for our revolving credit facility requires compliance with all of the covenants defined in the agreement. If we were out of compliance with any debt covenant required by ourthis credit agreement following the applicable cure period, the banks could terminate their commitments unless we could negotiate a covenant waiver from the banks. In addition, our long-term publicsenior notes and debentures could become due and payable if we were unable to obtain a covenant waiver or refinance our short-term debt under our credit agreement. If our credit rating falls below investment grade and/or if our average short-term debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA)EBITDA ratio falls below a certain level,rises above 1.50 to 1.00, the interest rate we currently pay on our outstanding short-term debt under the credit agreement would increase. However, the credit commitment could not be cancelled by the banks based solely on a ratings downgrade. Our debt rating for long-term unsecured senior, non-credit enhanced debt has beenwas unchanged during fiscal 20072010 by Standard and Poor’sPoor's Ratings Group at BBB- and by Moody’sMoody's Investors Service at Baa3.

Share Repurchase Plan

During fiscal 2007,2010, we continued our emphasis on repurchasing shares of our common stock as a means of utilizing excess cash andthereby reducing our shares outstanding. In addition, our repurchase programs provided shares for use in connection with our equity compensation programs. In May 2007,As of October 31, 2010, 1,329,238 shares remained available for repurchase under our Board authorization.

   On December 1, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 3,000,000 shares of our common stock in open-market or privately negotiated transactions. This repurchase authorization has no expiration date but may be terminated by our Board of Directors at any time. As of October 31, 2007, 1,134,175 shares remained available for repurchase under our Board authorization.

The following table provides information with respect to repurchases of our common stock during the past three fiscal years.

 

(Dollars in millions, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions, except per share data) 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Shares of common stock purchased

 

3,342,729

 

3,369,285

 

3,922,805

 

 2,678,474 3,316,536 2,809,927 

Cost to repurchase common stock

 

$

182.8

 

$

146.5

 

$

157.0

 

 $135.8 $115.3 $110.4 

Average price paid per share

 

$

54.70

 

$

43.49

 

$

40.02

 

 $50.69 $34.76 $39.27 
 

   We expect to continue repurchasing shares of our common stock in fiscal 2011 depending upon market conditions and our cash position.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONSCustomer Financing Arrangements

We do not customarily enter into off-balance sheet arrangements, except for off-balance sheet arrangements related to our customer financing activities, inventory purchase commitments, deferred compensation arrangements, and operating lease commitments disclosed in the contractual obligations table below. Moreover, it is not our normal policy to issue guarantees to third parties.

Wholesale Financing. Toro Credit Company (TCC), a wholly owned   In fiscal 2009, we established our Red Iron joint venture with TCFIF. The purpose of Red Iron is to provide inventory financing, subsidiary, providesincluding floor plan and open account receivable financing, for our North American Toro distributors and approximately 180 of our domestic dealers for select products that we manufacture. Independent North American Toro and Exmarkto distributors and dealers that do not finance through TCC generally finance their inventories with third party financing companies. All outstanding receivables of TCC are reflected on our consolidated balance sheets.

TCCproducts in the U.S. and third party financing companies purchase selected receivables from us andto select distributors of our products in Canada to enable our distributors and dealers for extended periods that assist our distributors and dealers in carryingto carry representative inventories of our products. DownUnder a separate arrangement, during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we implemented a program with TCFCFC to provide inventory financing to dealers of our products in Canada. Under these financing arrangements, down payments are not required and, depending on the finance program for each product line, finance charges are incurred by us, shared between us and the distributor and/or the dealer, or paid by the distributor or dealer. We retainRed Iron retains a security interest in the distributors’distributors' and dealers’dealers' financed inventories, and those inventories are monitored regularly. Under the salesFloor plan terms to the distributors and dealers finance charges are applied to outstanding balances fromrequire payment as the earlier ofequipment, which secures the date when productindebtedness, is sold to a customer,customers, or the expiration of company-supported financewhen payment terms granted at the time of sale, until payment is received by TCC or the third party finance company.become due, whichever occurs first. Rates are generally fixed or based on the prime rateindexed to LIBOR plus a fixed percentage dependingthat differs based on whether the financing is for a distributor or dealer. Rates may also vary based on the product that is financed. Distributors and dealers cannot cancel purchases after goods are shipped and are responsible for payment even if the equipment is not sold to retail customers.


Third party financing companiesRed Iron purchased $164.6$804.1 million of receivables from us during fiscal 2007,2010, of which $57.7$131.4 million was outstanding as of October 31, 2007. Our maximum exposure for credit recourse2010.

   Some independent international dealers continue to finance their products with athird party sources. These third party financing company related tocompanies purchased $11.1 million of receivables under these financing arrangementsfrom us during fiscal 2010, of which $5.0 million was $0.6 millionoutstanding as of October 31, 2007.2010.

   We also enter into limited inventory repurchase agreements with third party financing companies which includes and Red Iron for receivables soldfinanced by us to third party financing companies as well as receivables sold by our distributors to the third party financing companies.and Red Iron. As of October 31, 2007,2010, we were contingently liable to repurchase up to $5.8a maximum amount of $12.1 million of inventory related to receivables under these financing arrangements. We have repurchased immaterial amounts of inventory from third party financing companies over the past three fiscal years. However, a decline in retail sales or financial difficulties of our distributors or dealers could cause this situation to change and thereby require us to repurchase financed product.product, which could have an adverse effect on our operating results.

   We continue to provide inventory financing to home centers and mass retailers; general line irrigation dealers; international distributors and dealers other than the Canadian distributors and dealers to whom Red Iron provides financing arrangements; and government customers.

End-User Financing.We have agreements with a third party financing companycompanies to provide lease-financing options to golf course and sports fields and grounds equipment customers in North America, Europe,the



U.S. and Australia.Europe. The purpose of these agreements is to increase sales by giving buyers of our products alternative financing options when purchasing our products. During fiscal 2007, we entered into an amended agreement with a third party financing company that eliminated our contingent liability for any residual value risk on the underlying equipment financed under this program. In addition, under the terms of the amended agreement, we are only contingently liable for a portion of the credit collection risk for leases entered into prior to the effective date of the amended agreement. From time to time, we enter into agreements where we provide recourse to the third party finance company in the event of default by the customer for lease payments to the third party finance company. Our maximum exposure for credit collection as of October 31, 20072010 was $7.2$7.9 million. We have established a reserve for our estimated exposure related to this credit collection risk.

We also have an agreement to sell certain accounts receivable and notes to a third party. The total amount of receivables and notes outstanding under this agreement may not exceed $10.0 million at any time. During fiscal 2007, the company sold $1.1 million of receivables and notes under the terms of this agreement.

In the normal course of business, we have arrangements with other financial institutions to provide various forms of financing options to end-user customers. From time to time, our company-owned distributorships also guarantee the residual value at the end of leases with third-party financing companies for product sold to customers. The amount of this potential contingent liability as of October 31, 2007 was $4.4 million. None of these other arrangements requires any additional material financial involvement by us.

Termination of our end-user financing arrangements, or any material change to the terms in theof our end-user financing arrangements, availability of credit for our customers, including any delay in securing replacement credit sources, or significant financed product repurchase requirements could have a material adverse impact on our future operating results or financial condition; however, we do not believe those events are likely to occur.results.

Distributor Financing.   From time to time, we enter into long-term loan agreements with some distributors. These transactions are used for expansion of the distributors’distributors' businesses, acquisitions, refinancing working capital agreements, or facilitation of ownership changes. As of October 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, we had outstanding notes receivable in the aggregate of $2.3$3.1 million and $2.8$3.2 million, respectively, from two distribution companies. The amounts are included in other current and long-term assets on our consolidated balance sheets. The decrease of $0.5 million was the result of repayments on these loans.

Purchase Commitments.Contractual Obligations We have purchase commitments with some suppliers for materials and supplies as part of the normal course of business.

Contractual Obligations.The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of October 31, 2007.2010.

(Dollars in
thousands)

 

Payments Due By Period

 

Contractual
Obligation

 

Less Than
1 Year

 

1-3
Years

 

3-5
Years

 

More than
5 Years

 

Total

 

 

 Payments Due By Period  

(Dollars in thousands)
Contractual Obligation

 Less Than
1 Year
 1-3
Years
 3-5
Years
 More than
5 Years
 Total 
 

Long-term debt1

 

 

$

1,611

 

$

3,923

 

$

503

 

$

225,000

 

$

231,037

 

 $1,970 $220 $ $225,000 $227,190 

Short-term debt1

 

 

372

 

 

 

 

372

 

 776    776 

Interest payments

 

 

16,354

 

32,438

 

32,169

 

324,742

 

405,703

 

 16,162 32,171 32,162 276,498 356,993 

Deferred compensation arrangements2

 

 

513

 

1,774

 

1,441

 

2,730

 

6,458

 

 799 1,633 1,061 1,501 4,994 

Purchase obligations

 

 

2,877

 

 

 

 

2,877

 

 3,933    3,933 

Operating leases3

 

 

13,706

 

11,613

 

2,362

 

82

 

27,763

 

 12,956 17,854 9,128 15,523 55,461 
 

Total

 

 

$

35,433

 

$

49,748

 

$

36,475

 

$

552,554

 

$

674,210

 

 $36,596 $51,878 $42,351 $518,522 $649,347 
 

1
Principal payments

under our lines of credit.

2
The unfunded deferred compensation arrangements, covering certain current and retired management employees, consists primarily of salary and bonus deferrals under our deferred compensation plans. Our estimated distributions in the contractual obligations table are based upon a number of assumptions including termination dates and participant elections. Deferred compensation balances earn interest based on rates of return on funds established byare invested according to the Compensation and Human Resources Committeeelection of the Boardparticipant in an array of Directors,funds that is substantially similar to the array of funds offered under The Toro Company Investment, Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and are payable at the election of the participants.

participant.

3
Operating lease obligations do not include payments to landlords covering real estate taxes and common area maintenance.

As of October 31, 2007,2010, we also had $11.7$13.3 million in outstanding letters of credit issued during the normal course of business, as required by some vendor contracts. In addition to the above contractual obligations, we may be obligated for additional cash outflows of $6.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits. The payment and timing of any such payments is affected by the ultimate resolution of the tax years that are under audit or remain subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities.

Market Risk

Due to the nature and scope of our operations, we are subject to exposures that arise from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices. We are also exposed to equity market risk pertaining to the trading price of our common stock. Additional information is presented in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market


Risk," and Note 1314 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Inflation

We are subject to the effects of inflation, deflation, and changing prices. As previously mentioned,During fiscal 2010, we experienced risinghigher average commodity costs compared to the average prices paid for steel; fuel; petroleum-based resins; steel-, lead-, and copper-based component parts; and other commodities duringin fiscal 2007,2009, particularly in the second half of fiscal 2010, which hampered our gross margin growth rate in fiscal 20072010 as compared to fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2008,2009. We will continue to closely follow the commodities that affect our product lines, and we expectanticipate average prices paid for commodities to increasebe higher in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2007.2010. We plan to attemptexpect to mitigate the impact of these anticipated increases in commodity costs and other inflationary pressures by engaging in proactive vendor negotiations, andreviewing alternative sourcing options, substituting materials, engaging in internal cost reduction efforts, reviewing alternative sourcing options, and introducing moderate price increasesincreasing prices on some products.of our products, all as appropriate.

Acquisitions and Divestiture

In fiscal 2007,On April 30, 2010, we completed the acquisition of Rain Master. Rain Master manufactures irrigation central controllers and other products for the commercial landscape market, with annual sales of approximately $10 million.

In fiscal 2007, we also completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities from USPraxis, Inc., a manufacturer of Allen Hover Mower. Allen Hover Mower sells walk power mowers worldwide that are specifically designed to perform well on steep inclinesstump grinders, wood chippers, and log splitters for rental centers and landscape professionals. The addition of these products broadens and strengthens our equipment solutions for the golf courserental and grounds maintenance market, with annual sales of approximately $2 million.landscape markets.

In fiscal 2005,   On October 29, 2010, we completed the acquisition of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Hayter. Hayter designs, manufactures,one of our independent U.S. Western-based distributorships. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, our wholly owned domestic distribution company also completed the acquisition of certain assets and markets residentialassumed certain liabilities of one of our independent U.S. Midwestern-based distribution companies. During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we also completed the sale of a portion of the operations of our company-owned distributorship.


   In fiscal 2009, we completed the purchase of certain assets and professionalassumed certain liabilities of Ty-Crop Manufacturing Ltd., a leading manufacturer of topdressing and material handling equipment for golf course and sports fields applications. The acquisition of Ty-Crop's topdressing and material handling equipment enhanced our product offering of application and cultivation equipment to help customers achieve improved agronomic conditions of turf.

   In fiscal 2008, we completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Southern Green, Inc., a leading manufacturer of deep-tine aeration equipment. The acquisition of Southern Green's versatile line of Soil Reliever® aerators increased our offering of highly-productive turf maintenancecultivation equipment primarilyand provided entry into a new product category for our golf course and sports field markets.

   In fiscal 2008, we also completed the United Kingdom market, with annual salespurchase of approximately $50 million.Turf Guard wireless monitoring technology from JLH Labs, LLC, a leader in wireless soil monitoring technology. The Turf Guard system is designed to measure soil moisture, salinity, and temperature through buried wireless sensors that communicate data to an internet server for processing and presentation to a user through the web.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we must make decisions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, we apply judgments based on our understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances, historical experience, and actuarial valuations. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared.

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Some of those significant accounting policies require us to make difficult subjective or complex judgments or estimates. An accounting estimate is considered to be critical if it meets both of the following criteria: (i) the estimate requires assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and (ii) different estimates reasonably could have been used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period wouldmay have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition, or results of operations. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:

Warranty Reserve.   Warranty coverage on our products ranges from a periodis for specified periods of six months to seven years,time and on select products hours of usage, and generally covers parts, labor, and other expenses for non-maintenance repairs. Warranty coverage generally does not cover operator abuse andor improper use. At the time of sale, we accrue a warranty reserve by product line for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims. We also establish reserves for major rework campaigns. The amount of our warranty reserves is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty, historical average costs incurred to service warranty claims, the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, and the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty reserves based on changes in these factors and record any necessary adjustments if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Actual claims could be higher or lower than amounts estimated, as the amount and value of warranty claims are subject to variation due to such factors as performance of new products, significant manufacturing or design defects not discovered until after the product is delivered to customers, product failure rates, and higher or lower than expected service costs for a repair. We believe that analysis of historical trends and knowledge of potential manufacturing or design problems provide sufficient information to establish a reasonable estimate for warranty claims at the time of sale. However, since we cannot predict with certainty future warranty claims or costs associated with servicing those claims, our actual warranty costs may differ from our estimates. An unexpected increase in warranty claims or in the costs associated with servicing those claims would result in an increase in our warranty accrual and a decrease in our net earnings.

Sales Promotions and Incentives.   At the time of sale to a customer, we record an estimate for sales promotion and incentive costs which are classified as a reduction from gross sales or as a component of SG&A expense. Examples of sales promotion and incentive programs include rebate programs on certain professional products sold to distributors, volume discounts, retail financing support, floor planning, cooperative advertising, commissions, and other sales discounts and promotional programs. The estimates for sales promotion and incentive costs are based on the terms of the arrangements with customers, historical payment


experience, field inventory levels, volume purchases, and expectations for changes in relevant trends in the future. Actual results may differ from these estimates if competitive factors dictate the need to enhance or reduce sales promotion and incentive accruals or if customer usage and field inventory levels vary from historical trends. Adjustments to sales promotions and incentive accruals are made from time to time as actual usage becomes known in order to properly estimate the amounts necessary to generate consumer demand based on market conditions as of the balance sheet date.

Inventory Valuation.   We value our inventories at the lower of the cost of inventory or net realizable value, with cost determined by either the last-in, first-out (LIFO)LIFO method for most U.S. inventories or the first-in, first-out (FIFO)("FIFO") method for all other inventories. We establish



reserves for excess, slow moving, and obsolete inventory based on inventory levels, expected product lives,life, and forecasted sales demand. Valuation of inventory can also be affected by significant redesign of existing products or replacement of an existing product by an entirely new generation product. In assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future demand requirements compared with inventory levels. Reserve requirements are developed according to our projected demand requirements based on historical demand, competitive factors, and technological and product life cycle changes. It is possible that an increase in our reserve may be required in the future if there is a significant decline in demand for our products and we do not adjust our manufacturing production accordingly.

We also record a reserve for inventory shrinkage. Our inventory shrinkage reserve represents anticipated physical inventory losses that are recorded based on historical loss trends, ongoing cycle-count and periodic testing adjustments, and inventory levels. Though management considers reserve balances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in specific markets in which we operate could have an effect on the reserve balances required.

Accounts and Notes Receivable Valuation.   We value accounts and notes receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Each fiscal quarter, we prepare an analysis of our ability to collect outstanding receivables that provides a basis for an allowance estimate for doubtful accounts. In doing so, we evaluate the age of our receivables, past collection history, current financial conditions of key customers, and economic conditions. Based on this evaluation, we establish a reserve for specific accounts and notes receivable that we believe are uncollectible, as well as an estimate of uncollectible receivables not specifically known. Portions of our accounts receivable are protected by a security interest in products held by customers, which minimizes our collection exposure. A deterioration in the financial condition of any key customer, inability of customers to obtain bank credit lines, or a significant slow-down in the economy could have a material negative impact on our ability to collect a portion or all of the accounts and notes receivable. We believe that an analysis of historical trends and our current knowledge of potential collection problems provide us with sufficient information to establish a reasonable estimate for an allowance for doubtful accounts. However, since we cannot predict with certainty future changes in the financial stability of our customers or in the general economy, our actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates. In the event we determined that a smaller or larger uncollectible accounts reserve is appropriate, we would record a credit or charge to SG&A expense in the period that we made such a determination.

New Accounting Pronouncements to be Adopted

In December 2007,January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)Update ("ASU") No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations.” SFAS2010-06, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)." ASU No. 141R applies to all business combinations2010-06 requires new disclosures about recurring and nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and a description of the reasons for the transfers. In addition, ASU No. 2010-06 requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired to be recorded at “full fair value.” We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 141R to any business combination occurring on or after November 1, 2009, as required.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 definesnew disclosures regarding activity in Level 3 fair value establishes a framework for measuring fair value,measurements, including information on purchases, sales, issuances, and expands disclosures concerning fair value. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair valuesettlements on a recurringgross basis duringin the firstreconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. We adopted the provision of ASU No. 2010-06 for Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements in our second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2009,ended April 30, 2010, as required. We will adopt the provisionsprovision of SFASASU No. 1572010-06 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measuredLevel 3 fair-value measurements for our second fiscal quarter beginning on a recurring basis during the first quarter of fiscal 2010,January 30, 2011, as required. We are currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 157 and, we do not expect this new pronouncementthe adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 for Level 3 fair value measurements will have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.disclosures.

In August 2006,December 2009, the FASB issued Staff PositionASU No. AUG AIR-1, “Accounting2009-16, "Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities.”Transfers of Financial Assets," which amends Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 860, "Transfers and Servicing (FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140)." This Staff Position prohibitsASU eliminates the usequalifying special purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. It requires additional disclosures about the accrue-in-advance method of accountingrisks from continuing involvement in transferred financial assets accounted for planned major maintenance activities in annual and interim financial reporting periods.as sales. We adopted the provisions of this Staff Position as ofASU No. 2009-16 on November 1, 2007,2010, as required, and therequired. The adoption of this Staff Position willdid not have a material impacteffect on our fiscal 2008 consolidated results of operations or financial condition.statements.

In July 2006,December 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-17, "Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities," which amends ASC 810, "Consolidation (FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty46(R))." This ASU requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE"). The analysis identifies the primary beneficiary as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. This ASU also requires additional disclosures about an enterprise's involvement in Income Taxes” (FIN No. 48). This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance


with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” It prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.VIE. We adopted the provisions of this interpretation as ofASU No. 2009-17 on November 1, 2007,2010, as required, and therequired. The adoption of this Interpretation willdid not have a material impact toeffect on our fiscal 2008 consolidated financial condition or results of operations.statements.

No other new accounting pronouncement that has been issued but not yet effective for us during fiscal 20072010 has had or is expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. We are also exposed to equity market risk pertaining to the trading price of our common stock. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our net earnings and cash flows. See further discussions on these market risks below.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk.In the normal course of business, we actively manage the exposure of our foreign currency exchange rate market risk by entering into various hedging instruments, authorized under company policies that place controls on these activities, with counterparties that are highly rated financial institutions. Our hedging activities involve the primary use of forward currency contracts. We use derivative instruments only in an attempt to limit underlying exposure from currency fluctuations and to minimize earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes and not for trading purposes. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk arising from transactions in the normal course of business, such as sales and loans to wholly owned foreign subsidiaries, as well as sales to third party customersforeign plant operations, and purchases from suppliers. Because our products are manufactured or sourced primarily from the United States and Mexico, a stronger U.S. dollar and Mexican peso generally has a negative impact on our results from operations, outside the United States, while a weaker dollar and peso generally has a positive effect. Our primary currency exchange rate exposure isexposures are with the Euro, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Mexican peso, and the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar.

We enter into various contracts, principally forward contracts that change in value as foreign currency exchange rates change, to protect the value of existing foreign currency assets, liabilities, anticipated sales, and probable commitments. Decisions on whether to use such contracts are made based on the amount of exposures to the currency involved and an assessment of the near-term market value for each currency. Worldwide foreign currency exchange rate exposures are reviewed monthly. The gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the valuemarket values of the related exposures. Therefore, changes in market values of these hedge instruments are highly correlated with changes in market values of underlying hedged items both at inception of the hedge and over the life of the hedge contract. During fiscal 2007, 2006,Further information regarding gains and 2005,losses on our derivative instruments is presented in Note 14 of the amount of losses treated as a reduction of net sales for contractsnotes to hedge sales were $2.2 million, $0.4 million, and $3.0 million, respectively. The gains treated as a reduction to cost of sales for contracts to hedge inventory purchases were $1.0 million for fiscal 2007, $0.1 million for fiscal 2006, and $1.3 million for fiscal 2005.our consolidated financial statements.

The following foreign currency exchange contracts held by us have maturity dates in fiscal 2008.2011 and 2012. All items are non-trading and stated in U.S. dollars. Some derivative instruments we enter into do not meet the cash flow hedging criteria of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;”criteria; therefore, changes in fair value are recorded in other income (expense), net. The average contracted rate, notional amount, pre-tax value of derivative instruments in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL)("AOCL"), and fair value impact of derivative instruments in other income (expense), net as of and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 20072010 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Value in

 

Fair Value

 

Dollars in thousands

 

Average

 

 

 

AOCL

 

Impact

 

(except average
contracted rate)

 

Contracted
Rate

 

Notional
Amount

 

Income
(Loss)

 

(Loss)
Gain

 

Buy U.S. $/Sell Canadian dollar

 

 

0.9899

 

$

7,919.0

 

$

(551.0

)

$

43.5

 

Buy U.S. $/Sell Australian dollar

 

 

0.8722

 

57,973.3

 

(2,222.2

)

(2,667.2

)

Buy U.S. $/Sell Euro

 

 

1.3961

 

94,516.7

 

(3,438.5

)

(1,344.7

)

Buy U.S. $/Sell British pound

 

 

2.0598

 

3,707.6

 

 

(31.1

)

Buy Australian dollar/Sell U.S. $ 

 

 

0.9311

 

74.5

 

 

 

Buy Euro/Sell Australian dollar

 

 

0.6163

 

79.1

 

 

(3.4

)

Buy British pound/Sell U.S. $ 

 

 

2.0898

 

104.5

 

 

(0.6

)

Buy Japanese yen/Sell U.S. $ 

 

 

114.6200

 

87.2

 

 

(0.6

)

Buy Mexican peso/Sell U.S. $ 

 

 

11.0828

 

9,654.6

 

239.1

 

1,008.3

 

  

Dollars in thousands
(except average contracted rate)

  Average
Contracted
Rate
  Notional
Amount
  Value in
AOCL
Income
(Loss)
  Fair Value
Impact
(Loss)
Gain
 
  

Buy U.S. $/Sell Canadian dollar

  0.9535 $8,772.0 $(145.0)$(293.0)

Buy U.S. $/Sell Australian dollar

  0.9387  65,537.8  (1,893.7) (5,157.0)

Buy U.S. $/Sell Euro

  1.3387  76,643.0  (2,844.3) 1,563.1 

Buy U.S. $/Sell British pound

  1.5761  2,836.9    (46.9)

Buy Mexican peso/Sell U.S. $

  13.0919  20,088.8  703.9  240.4 

Buy Romanian New Lei/Sell Euro

  4.263  2,516.6    (8.6)
  

   

Our net investment in foreign subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars is not hedged. Any changes in foreign currency exchange rates would be reflected as a foreign currency translation adjustment, a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’stockholders' equity, and would not impact net earnings.

Interest Rate Risk.   Our market risk on interest rates relates primarily to LIBOR-based short-term debt from commercial banks, as well as the potential increase in fair value of long-term debt resulting from a potential decrease in interest rates. However, we do not have a cash flow or earnings exposure due to market risks on long-term debt. We generally do not use interest rate swaps to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. As of October 31, 2007, our financial liabilities with exposure to changes


in interest rates consisted mainly of $0.4 million of short-term debt outstanding. Assuming a hypothetical increase of one percent (100 basis points) in short-term interest rates, with all other variables remaining constant, including the average balance of short-term debt outstanding during fiscal 2007,2010, interest expense would have increased $0.5 million$12 thousand in fiscal 2007.2010. Included in long-term debt is $229.2$225.5 million of fixed-rate debt that is not subject to variable interest rate fluctuations. As a result, we have no earnings or cash flow exposure due to market risks on our long-term debt obligations. As of October 31, 2007,2010, the estimated fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates was $241.6$227.4 million compared to its carrying valueamount of $229.2$225.5 million. The fair value is estimated by discounting the projected cash flows using the rate that similar amounts and terms of debt could currently be borrowed.borrowed.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, we entered into three treasury lock agreements based on a 30-year U.S. Treasury security with a principal balance of $30 million for two of the agreements and $40 million for the third agreement. These treasury lock agreements provided for a single payment at maturity, which was April 23, 2007, based on the change in value of the reference treasury security. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges and resulted in a net settlement of $0.2 million. This loss iswas recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and will


be amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term of the senior notes.

Commodity Risk.We are subject to market risk from fluctuating market prices of certain purchased commodity raw materials including steel, aluminum, fuel, petroleum-based resin, and linerboard. In addition, we are a purchaser of components and parts containing various commodities, including steel, aluminum, copper, lead, rubber, and others which are integrated into our end products. While such materials are typically available from numerous suppliers, commodity raw materials are subject to price fluctuations. We generally buy these commodities and components based upon market prices that are established with the vendor as part of the purchase process. We generally attempt to obtain firm pricing from most of our suppliers for volumes consistent with planned production. To the extent that commodity prices increase and we do not have firm pricing from our suppliers, or our suppliers are not able to honor such prices, we may experience a decline in our gross margins to the extent we are not able to increase selling prices of our products or obtain manufacturing efficiencies to offset increases in commodity costs. Further information regarding rising prices for commodities is presented in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”Operations" of this report in the section entitled “Inflation.”"Inflation."

We enter into fixed-price contracts for future purchases of natural gas in the normal course of operations as a means to manage natural gas price risks. These contracts meet the definition of “normal purchases or normal sales” and therefore, are not considered derivative instruments for accounting purposes. Our manufacturing facilities enter into these fixed-price contracts for approximately 70 to 8580 percent of their monthly anticipated usage.

Equity Price Risk.The trading price volatility of Toro common stock impacts compensation expense related to our stock-based compensation plans. Further information is presented in Note 910 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements regarding our stock-based compensation plans.



37




ITEM 8.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for The Toro Company and its subsidiaries. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Companycompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective, can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projection of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management, with the participation of the Company’scompany's Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007.2010. In making this evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)("COSO") inInternal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31, 2007.2010.

/s/ Michael J. Hoffman



Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Stephen P. Wolfe



Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Further discussion of the Company’sCompany's internal controls and procedures is included in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls"Controls and Procedures”Procedures" of this report.


38




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Stockholders and Board of Directors
The Toro Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Toro Company and subsidiaries as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2007.2010. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a) 2. We also have audited The Toro Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007,2010 based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Toro Company’sCompany's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and the identified financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule and an opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Toro Company as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009 and the results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2007,2010, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the relatedidentified financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. It is alsoAlso in our opinion, The Toro Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007,2010 based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 22, 2010

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,” as of October 31, 2007.


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 21, 2007

39




CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010 2009 2008 
 

Net sales

 

$

1,876,904

 

$

1,835,991

 

$

1,779,387

 

Net sales

 $1,690,378 $1,523,447 $1,878,184 

Cost of sales

 

1,198,529

 

1,192,675

 

1,164,021

 

Cost of sales

  1,113,987 1,012,472 1,225,474 

Gross profit

 

678,375

 

643,316

 

615,366

 

 

Gross profit

  576,391 510,975 652,710 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

 

454,726

 

440,440

 

432,640

 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

  425,125 395,778 454,301 

Earnings from operations

 

223,649

 

202,876

 

182,726

 

 

Earnings from operations

  151,266 115,197 198,409 

Interest expense

 

(19,445

)

(17,672

)

(17,733

)

Interest expense

  (17,113) (17,578) (19,333)

Other income, net

 

9,023

 

7,550

 

5,279

 

Earnings before income taxes

 

213,227

 

192,754

 

170,272

 

Other income (expense), net

Other income (expense), net

  7,115 (1,831) 2,213 
 

Earnings before income taxes

  141,268 95,788 181,289 

Provision for income taxes

 

70,791

 

63,609

 

56,190

 

Provision for income taxes

  48,031 32,951 61,638 

Net earnings

 

$

142,436

 

$

129,145

 

$

114,082

 

 

Net earnings

 $93,237 $62,837 $119,651 
 

Basic net earnings per share of common stock

 

$

3.50

 

$

3.01

 

$

2.55

 

Basic net earnings per share of common stock

 $2.83 $1.76 $3.17 
 

Diluted net earnings per share of common stock

 

$

3.40

 

$

2.91

 

$

2.45

 

Diluted net earnings per share of common stock

 $2.79 $1.73 $3.10 
 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding –
Basic

 

40,682

 

42,887

 

44,714

 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding – Basic

  32,982 35,788 37,736 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding –
Diluted

 

41,864

 

44,344

 

46,539

 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding – Diluted

  33,437 36,240 38,579 
 

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


40





CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

62,047

 

$

55,523

 

Receivables, net:

 

 

 

 

 

Customers (net of $3,647 and $2,339 as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for allowance for doubtful accounts)

 

273,527

 

284,082

 

Other

 

9,588

 

10,751

 

Total receivables, net

 

283,115

 

294,833

 

Inventories, net

 

251,275

 

238,544

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

10,677

 

9,437

 

Deferred income taxes

 

57,814

 

55,846

 

Total current assets

 

664,928

 

654,183

 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

 

170,672

 

166,323

 

Deferred income taxes

 

5,185

 

1,862

 

Other assets

 

9,153

 

10,011

 

Goodwill

 

86,224

 

81,469

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

14,675

 

5,225

 

Total assets

 

$

950,837

 

$

919,073

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

1,611

 

$

 

Short-term debt

 

372

 

320

 

Accounts payable

 

90,966

 

89,673

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Warranty

 

62,030

 

65,235

 

Advertising and marketing programs

 

53,765

 

50,124

 

Compensation and benefit costs

 

61,462

 

77,721

 

Income taxes

 

2,089

 

8,060

 

Other

 

69,175

 

51,496

 

Total current liabilities

 

341,470

 

342,629

 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

227,598

 

175,000

 

Deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities

 

11,331

 

9,415

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, par value $1.00, authorized 1,000,000 voting and 850,000 non-voting shares, none issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $1.00, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 37,950,831 shares as of October 31, 2007 (net of 16,081,389 treasury shares) and 40,355,714 shares as of October 31, 2006 (net of 13,676,506 treasury shares)

 

37,951

 

40,356

 

Retained earnings

 

335,384

 

358,522

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(2,897

)

(6,849

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

370,438

 

392,029

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

950,837

 

$

919,073

 

  

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) October 31

  2010  2009 
  

ASSETS

       
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $177,366 $187,773 
 

Receivables, net:

       
  

Customers (net of $3,828 and $4,075 as of October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for allowance for doubtful accounts)

  128,354  134,627 
  

Other

  14,547  9,082 
  
   

Total receivables, net

  142,901  143,709 
  
 

Inventories, net

  194,402  176,275 
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  10,766  14,914 
 

Deferred income taxes

  59,538  59,467 
  
   

Total current assets

  584,973  582,138 
  
 

Property, plant, and equipment, net

  173,407  166,716 
 

Deferred income taxes

  842  3,585 
 

Other assets

  17,038  10,512 
 

Goodwill

  86,400  86,407 
 

Other intangible assets, net

  22,962  23,324 
  
   

Total assets

 $885,622 $872,682 
  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

       
 

Current portion of long-term debt

 $1,970 $3,765 
 

Short-term debt

  1,034  4,529 
 

Accounts payable

  125,138  91,074 
 

Accrued liabilities:

       
  

Warranty

  56,934  54,273 
  

Advertising and marketing programs

  43,095  45,298 
  

Compensation and benefit costs

  58,707  47,214 
  

Insurance

  24,858  18,924 
  

Income taxes

  7,645  440 
  

Other

  48,902  51,284 
  
   

Total current liabilities

  368,283  316,801 
  
 

Long-term debt, less current portion

  223,578  225,046 
 

Deferred revenue

  10,944  8,510 
 

Other long-term liabilities

  7,007  7,113 
 

Stockholders' equity:

       
  

Preferred stock, par value $1.00, authorized 1,000,000 voting and 850,000 non-voting shares, none issued and outstanding

     
  

Common stock, par value $1.00, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 31,394,942 shares as of October 31, 2010 and 33,369,486 shares as of October 31, 2009

  31,395  33,369 
  

Retained earnings

  253,477  291,246 
  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (9,062) (9,403)
  
   

Total stockholders' equity

  275,810  315,212 
  
   

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $885,622 $872,682 
  

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


41





CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 (Dollars in thousands) Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings

 

$

142,436

 

$

129,145

 

$

114,082

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash asset impairment

 

 

 

23

 

Provision for depreciation and amortization

 

42,105

 

42,564

 

42,829

 

Equity losses from investments

 

361

 

1,559

 

1,468

 

Gain on disposal of property, plant, and equipment

 

(194

)

(110

)

(260

)

Increase in deferred income taxes

 

(522

)

(1,709

)

(9,012

)

Stock-based compensation expense

 

7,293

 

6,641

 

9,312

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net

 

9,033

 

75

 

7,381

 

Inventories, net

 

(1,915

)

(522

)

(1,210

)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(977

)

9,390

 

462

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and deferred revenue

 

(14,046

)

3,238

 

9,008

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

183,574

 

190,271

 

174,083

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

 

(42,168

)

(39,885

)

(37,432

)

Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment

 

267

 

1,033

 

2,740

 

Investments in affiliates

 

 

(371

)

(757

)

Decrease in other assets

 

1,494

 

1,161

 

1,550

 

Proceeds from sale of a business

 

 

 

765

 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(9,881

)

 

(35,285

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(50,288

)

(38,062

)

(68,419

)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in short-term debt, net

 

(10

)

(5

)

(774

)

Issuance of long-term debt, net of costs

 

121,491

 

 

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(75,000

)

(46

)

(45

)

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

 

13,775

 

13,131

 

5,989

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

13,255

 

10,683

 

8,164

 

Purchases of Toro common stock

 

(182,843

)

(146,543

)

(156,972

)

Dividends paid on Toro common stock

 

(19,459

)

(15,421

)

(10,755

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(128,791

)

(138,201

)

(154,393

)

Effect of exchange rates on cash

 

2,029

 

113

 

(625

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

6,524

 

14,121

 

(49,354

)

Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the fiscal year

 

55,523

 

41,402

 

90,756

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the fiscal year

 

$

62,047

 

$

55,523

 

$

41,402

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the fiscal year for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

18,234

 

$

18,365

 

$

18,310

 

Income taxes

 

61,257

 

56,985

 

46,761

 

Stock issued in connection with stock-based compensation plans

 

4,971

 

6,176

 

4,284

 

Long-term debt issued in connection with an acquisition

 

6,000

 

 

 

  

(Dollars in thousands) Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010  2009  2008 
  

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

          
 

Net earnings

 $93,237 $62,837 $119,651 
 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

          
  

Provision for depreciation and amortization

  45,011  44,535  48,194 
  

Equity (income) losses from affiliates

  (2,599) 136  859 
  

Gain on disposal of property, plant, and equipment

  (85) (18) (196)
  

Gain on sale of a business

      (113)
  

Decrease (increase) in deferred income taxes

  2,940  4,691  (5,466)
  

Stock-based compensation expense

  6,442  4,116  5,684 
 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

          
  

Receivables, net

  (80) 126,721  14,770 
  

Inventories, net

  (9,920) 40,036  29,949 
  

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  3,056  (4,360) 719 
  

Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, deferred revenue, and other long-term liabilities

  55,505  (27,224) 1,671 
  
   

Net cash provided by operating activities

  193,507  251,470  215,722 
  

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

          
 

Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

  (48,699) (37,939) (48,914)
 

Proceeds from asset disposals

  574  208  1,021 
 

Increase in investments in affiliates

  (3,659) (3,811) (250)
 

Decrease (increase) in other assets

  635  1,982  (35)
 

Proceeds from sale of a business

      1,048 
 

Acquisitions, net of cash acquired

  (9,657) (6,400) (4,430)
  
   

Net cash used in investing activities

  (60,806) (45,960) (51,560)
  

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

          
 

Increase (decrease) in short-term debt, net

  776  (2,326) 2,887 
 

Repayments of long-term debt

  (3,646) (3,422) (1,497)
 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards

  3,396  7,403  3,522 
 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  16,680  13,726  3,997 
 

Purchases of Toro common stock

  (135,777) (115,283) (110,355)
 

Dividends paid on Toro common stock

  (23,721) (21,403) (22,615)
  
   

Net cash used in financing activities

  (142,292) (121,305) (124,061)
  

Effect of exchange rates on cash

  (816) 4,209  (2,789)
  

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (10,407) 88,414  37,312 

Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the fiscal year

  187,773  99,359  62,047 
  

Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of the fiscal year

 $177,366 $187,773 $99,359 
  

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

          
 

Cash paid during the fiscal year for:

          
  

Interest

 $17,281 $17,724 $19,797 
  

Income taxes

  28,569  29,803  55,850 
 

Shares issued in connection with stock-based compensation plans

  903  1,524  2,305 
 

Long-term debt issued in connection with acquisitions

  440  1,500  3,130 
  

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


42





CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Common
Stock

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

 

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

 

Comprehensive
Income

 

Balance as of October 31, 2004

 

$

45,036

 

$

386,925

 

 

$

(11,142

)

 

$

420,819

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.24 per share

 

 

(10,755

)

 

 

 

(10,755

)

 

 

 

Issuance of 784,610 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 

785

 

13,374

 

 

 

 

14,159

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 Common
Stock
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
Stockholders'
Equity
 Comprehensive
Income
 
 

Balance as of October 31, 2007

 $37,951 $335,384 $(2,897)$370,438   
   

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.60 per share

  (22,615)  (22,615)   

Issuance of 343,862 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 344 9,035  9,379   

Contribution of stock to a deferred compensation trust

 

 

3,151

 

 

 

 

3,151

 

 

 

 

  302  302   

Purchase of 3,922,805 shares of common stock

 

(3,922

)

(153,050

)

 

 

 

(156,972

)

 

 

 

Purchase of 2,809,927 shares of common stock

 (2,810) (107,545)  (110,355)   

Excess tax benefits from stock options

 

 

5,989

 

 

 

 

5,989

 

 

 

 

  3,522  3,522   

Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax

 

 

 

 

(43

)

 

(43

)

 

$

(43

)

Retirement benefits adjustment, net of tax

   359 359 $359 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

(2,395

)

 

(2,395

)

 

(2,395

)

   (18,367) (18,367) (18,367)

Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

1,999

 

 

1,999

 

 

1,999

 

   12,361 12,361 12,361 

Net earnings

 

 

114,082

 

 

 

 

114,082

 

 

114,082

 

  119,651  119,651 119,651 
   

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

113,643

 

         $114,004 

Balance as of October 31, 2005

 

$

41,899

 

$

359,716

 

 

$

(11,581

)

 

$

390,034

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.36 per share

 

 

(15,421

)

 

 

 

(15,421

)

 

 

 

Issuance of 1,826,536 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 

1,826

 

10,940

 

 

 

 

12,766

 

 

 

 

   

Balance as of October 31, 2008

 $35,485 $337,734 $(8,544)$364,675   
   

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.60 per share

  (21,403)  (21,403)   

Issuance of 1,201,256 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 1,201 16,524  17,725   

Contribution of stock to a deferred compensation trust

 

 

4,185

 

 

 

 

4,185

 

 

 

 

  118  118   

Purchase of 3,369,285 shares of common stock

 

(3,369

)

(143,174

)

 

 

 

(146,543

)

 

 

 

Purchase of 3,316,536 shares of common stock

 (3,317) (111,967)  (115,284)   

Excess tax benefits from stock options

 

 

13,131

 

 

 

 

13,131

 

 

 

 

  7,403  7,403   

Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax

 

 

 

 

2,077

 

 

2,077

 

 

$

2,077

 

Retirement benefits adjustment, net of tax

   (2,633) (2,633)$(2,633)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

2,798

 

 

2,798

 

 

2,798

 

   13,286 13,286 13,286 

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

(143

)

 

(143

)

 

(143

)

   (11,512) (11,512) (11,512)

Net earnings

 

 

129,145

 

 

 

 

129,145

 

 

129,145

 

  62,837  62,837 62,837 
   

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

133,877

 

         $61,978 

Balance as of October 31, 2006

 

$

40,356

 

$

358,522

 

 

$

(6,849

)

 

$

392,029

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.48 per share

 

 

(19,459

)

 

 

 

(19,459

)

 

 

 

Issuance of 937,846 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 

938

 

18,862

 

 

 

 

19,800

 

 

 

 

   

Balance as of October 31, 2009

 $33,369 $291,246 $(9,403)$315,212   
   

Cash dividends paid on common stock – $0.72 per share

  (23,721)  (23,721)   

Issuance of 703,930 shares under stock-based compensation plans

 704 22,348  23,052   

Contribution of stock to a deferred compensation trust

 

 

748

 

 

 

 

748

 

 

 

 

  70  70   

Purchase of 3,342,729 shares of common stock

 

(3,343

)

(179,500

)

 

 

 

(182,843

)

 

 

 

Purchase of 2,678,474 shares of common stock

 (2,678) (133,099)  (135,777)   

Excess tax benefits from stock options

 

 

13,775

 

 

 

 

13,775

 

 

 

 

  3,396  3,396   

Adjustment related to adoption of SFAS No. 158, net of tax

 

 

 

 

(1,484

)

 

(1,484

)

 

 

 

Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

41

 

 

$

41

 

Retirement benefits adjustment, net of tax

   681 681 $681 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

9,757

 

 

9,757

 

 

9,757

 

   (640) (640) (640)

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments, net of tax

 

 

 

 

(4,362

)

 

(4,362

)

 

(4,362

)

Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax

   300 300 300 

Net earnings

 

 

142,436

 

 

 

 

142,436

 

 

142,436

 

  93,237  93,237 93,237 
   

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

147,872

 

         $93,578 

Balance as of October 31, 2007

 

$

37,951

 

$

335,384

 

 

$

(2,897

)

 

$

370,438

 

 

 

 

   

Balance as of October 31, 2010

 $31,395 $253,477 $(9,062)$275,810   
   

The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


43




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


1

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
AND RELATED DATA

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. The company uses the equity method to account for investments over which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. Consolidated net earnings include the company’scompany's share of the net earnings (losses) of these companies. The cost method is used to account for investments in companies that the company does not control and for which it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. In accordance with the cost method, theseThese investments are recorded at cost or fair value, as appropriate.cost. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation ofIn preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires("GAAP"), management tomust make estimates and assumptionsdecisions that affectimpact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and liabilities, and disclosurethe related disclosures, including disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities asliabilities. Such decisions include the selection of the dateappropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. Estimates are used in determining, among other items, sales promotions and incentives accruals, inventory valuation, warranty reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, pension and postretirement accruals, useful lives for intangible assets, and future cash flows associated with impairment testing for goodwill and other long-lived assets. These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and judgments. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, including the current economic environment. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. A number of these factors are discussed in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of this report, which include, among others, economic conditions, foreign currency exchange rate impact, commodity costs, credit conditions, and consumer spending and confidence levels, all of which may increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual amounts could differ significantly from those estimated at the time the consolidated financial statements andare prepared. Changes in those estimates resulting from changes in the reported amounts of revenue and expenses duringeconomic environment will be reflected in the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts from prior years’consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no impact on results of operations as previously reported.in future periods.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with aan original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.equivalents and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Receivables

The company's financial exposure to collection of accounts receivable is reduced due to its Red Iron Acceptance, LLC ("Red Iron") joint venture with TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. ("TCFIF"), as further discussed in Note 3. For receivables not serviced through the company's joint venture with TCFIF, the company grants credit to customers in the normal course of business. Managementbusiness, performs on-going credit evaluations of customers, and maintains allowances for potential credit losses. Receivables are recorded at original carrying valueamount less reserves for estimated uncollectible accounts.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO)("LIFO") method for most inventories. The first-in, first-out (FIFO)("FIFO") method is used for all other inventories, constituting approximately 3533 percent of total inventories as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006.2009. The company establishes a reserve for excess, slow-moving, and obsolete inventory that is based onequal to the difference between the cost and estimated net realizable value for that inventory. These reserves are based on a review and comparison of current inventory levels to the planned production and product life, as well as planned and historical sales of the inventory.

During fiscal 2006,2010, no LIFO inventory layers were reduced. This reductionDuring fiscal 2009, LIFO inventory layers were reduced that resulted in charging lower inventory costs prevailing in previous years to cost of sales, thus reducing cost of sales by $713$3,284 in fiscal 2009 below the amount that would have resulted from replacing the liquidated inventory at end of year prices. During fiscal 2007, LIFO inventory layers were also reduced, which resulted in an immaterial impact to cost of sales.

Inventories as of October 31 were as follows:

 

 2010 2009 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

Raw materials and work in progress

Raw materials and work in progress

 

$ 68,367

 

$ 67,976

 

 $66,152 $56,679 

Finished goods and service parts

Finished goods and service parts

 

242,965

 

229,137

 

 183,992 169,739 

 

311,332

 

297,113

 

 

Less: LIFO reserve

 

42,889

 

40,860

 

Total FIFO value

 250,144 226,418 

Less: adjustment to LIFO value

 55,742 50,143 

Reserves for excess and obsolete inventory

 

17,168

 

17,709

 

 

Total

Total

 

$ 251,275

 

$ 238,544

 

 $194,402 $176,275 
 

Property and Depreciation

Property, plant, and equipment are carried at cost. The company provides for depreciation of plant and equipment utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Buildings, including leasehold improvements, are generally depreciated over 10 to 45 years, and equipment over 3three to 7seven years. Tooling costs are generally depreciated over 3three to 5five years using the straight-line method. Software and web site development costs are generally amortized over 2two to 5five years utilizing the straight-line method. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements, which substantially increase the useful lives of existing assets, are capitalized, and maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Interest is capitalized during the construction period for significant capital projects. During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, the company capitalized $820, $760,$131, $98, and $408$419 of interest, respectively.


Property, plant, and equipment as of October 31 was as follows:

 

 2010 2009 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

Land and land improvements

 

$ 22,670

 

$ 22,256

 

 $24,667 $22,736 

Buildings and leasehold improvements

 

111,789

 

107,650

 

 115,480 114,905 

Machinery and equipment

 

394,942

 

362,136

 

 396,228 358,575 

Computer hardware and software

 

47,681

 

48,297

 

 57,695 55,531 
 

Subtotal

 

577,082

 

540,339

 

 594,070 551,747 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

406,410

 

374,016

 

 420,663 385,031 
 

Total property, plant, and equipment, net

 

$ 170,672

 

$ 166,323

 

 $173,407 $166,716 
 

   

During fiscal years 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, the company recorded depreciation expense of $40,529, $41,219,$42,108, $42,031, and $41,579,$46,099, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired and accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires that goodwill and certain other tangible assets having indefinite lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested annually for impairment or more frequently if events suggest the remaining value may not be recoverable.

Other intangible assets with determinable lives consist primarily of patents, non-compete agreements, customer relationships, and developed technology that are amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to 13 years.

Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets

The company reviews long-lived assets, includingindefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill, for impairment annually during each fourth fiscal quarter or more frequently if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest the remaining value may not be recoverable. An asset is deemed impaired and written down to its fair value if estimated related future cash flows are less than its carrying amount.

   The company reviewed the fair value of its reporting units that have goodwill on their respective balance sheets with their corresponding carrying amount (with goodwill) during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The company determined that it has seven reporting units, which are the same as its seven operating segments. Five reporting units contain goodwill on their respective balance sheets. As of August 27, 2010, the company performed a discounted cash flow analysis for all of its reporting units to estimate their respective fair values. The carrying amount is based on the assets and liabilities associated with the operations of each reporting unit, which includes an allocation of corporate assets and liabilities based on key financial ratios, such as a proportion of the total account balances to net sales or cost of sales of the respective reporting unit. Growth rates for sales and profits are determined using inputs from the company's annual long-range planning process. Management also makes estimates of discount rates, perpetuity growth assumptions, and other factors.

   The company also performed an assessment of its indefinite-life intangible assets, mainly trade names, as of October 31, 2010. The company's estimate of the fair value of its trade names are based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs which included: projected revenues from the company's annual plan; assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the company did not own the trade name; and a discount rate.

   Other long-lived assets, including property, plant, and equipment and definite-life intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset (or asset group) may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the operation or disposition of the asset group are less than the carrying amount of the asset group. Asset groups have identifiable cash flows and are largely independent of other asset groups. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset group over its fair value. Fair value is measured using a discounted cash flow model or independent appraisals, as appropriate. For long-lived assets to be abandoned, the company tests for potential impairment. If the company commits to a plan to abandon a long-lived asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life, depreciation estimates are revised.

   Based on the company’s annualcompany's impairment analysis, the company wrote down $348, $1,071, and $3,843 of long-lived assets during fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005, no long-lived assets, goodwill,2008, respectively.

Accounts Payable

In fiscal 2009, the company entered into a customer-managed services agreement with a third party to provide a web-based platform that facilitates participating suppliers' ability to finance payment obligations from the company with a designated third party financial institution. Participating suppliers may, at their sole discretion, make offers to finance one or other intangible assets were deemed impaired.

Accrued Warranties

The company provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs at the time of sale. The amountmore payment obligations of the liabilitycompany prior to their scheduled due dates at a discounted price to a participating financial institution.

   The company's obligations to its suppliers, including amounts due and scheduled payment dates, are not impacted by suppliers'


decisions to finance amounts under this arrangement. However, the company's right to offset balances due from suppliers against payment obligations is based uponrestricted by this arrangement for those payment obligations that have been financed by suppliers. As of October 31, 2010 and 2009, $7,312 and $2,752, respectively, of the historical relationship of warranty claims to sales by product line and major rework campaigns. The changes in warranty reserves were as follows:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

Beginning Balance

 

$ 65,235

 

$ 61,385

 

Warranty provisions

 

44,040

 

41,997

 

Warranty claims

 

(44,416

)

(41,700

)

Changes in estimates

 

(2,829

)

3,553

 

Ending Balance

 

$ 62,030

 

$ 65,235

 

company's outstanding payment obligations had been placed on the accounts payable tracking system.

Insurance

The company is self-insured for certain losses relating to medical, dental, workers’and workers' compensation claims, and product liability claims.occurrences. Specific stop loss coverages are provided for catastrophic claims in order to limit exposure to significant claims. Losses and claims are charged to operations when it is probable a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Accrued insurance liabilities are based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported.

Accrued Warranties

The company provides an accrual for estimated future warranty costs at the time of sale. The company also establishes accruals for major rework campaigns. The amount of warranty accruals is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty, historical average costs incurred to service warranty claims, the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, and the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim. The company periodically assesses the adequacy of its warranty accruals based on changes in these factors and records any necessary adjustments if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary.

   The changes in accrued warranties were as follows:

  

Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010  2009 
  

Beginning Balance

 $54,273 $58,770 

Warranty provisions

  36,540  32,721 

Warranty claims

  (32,570) (38,225)

Changes in estimates

  (1,334) 907 

Addition from acquisitions

  25  100 
  

Ending Balance

 $56,934 $54,273 
  

Derivatives

Derivatives, consisting mainly of forward currency contracts, are used to hedge most foreign currency transactions, including forecasted sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies. Derivatives are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded to a separate component of stockholders’stockholders' equity, captioned accumulated other comprehensive loss, and recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. Derivatives that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting are adjusted to fair value through other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions

The functional currency of the company’scompany's foreign operations is the applicable local currency. The functional currency is translated into U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using current exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using a weighted-average exchange rate during the fiscal year. The translation adjustments are deferred as a separate component of stockholders’stockholders' equity captioned accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains or losses resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of earnings.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years that those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided when, in management’smanagement's judgment, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The company has reflected the necessary deferred tax assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Management believes the future tax deductions will be


realized principally through carryback to taxable income in prior years, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, and future taxable income.

   The company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The company also records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

Revenue Recognition

ToroThe company recognizes revenue for product sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risk of ownership passes, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is probable. These criteria are typically met at the time product is shipped, or in the case of certain agreements, when product is delivered. The company ships some of its products on consignment to a key retailer. Toro recognizes revenue for these consignment transactions when the product is shipped from the retailer’s distribution centers to their stores. A provision is made at the time the related revenue is recognized for estimated product returns, cost of product warranties, floor plan costs, rebates, and other sales promotional expenses. Sales, use, value-added,


and other excise taxes are not recognized in revenue. Freight revenue billed to customers is also included in net sales.

Retail customers may obtain financing through a third-party financing companycompanies to assist in their purchase of the company’scompany's products. Most of these leases are classified as sales-type leases. However, based on the terms and conditions of the financing agreements, some transactions are classified as operating leases, which results in recognition of revenue over the lease term on a straight-line basis.

   The company ships some of its products to a key retailer's seasonal distribution centers on a consignment basis. The company retains title of its products stored at the seasonal distribution centers. As the company's products are removed from the seasonal distribution centers by the key retailer and shipped to the key retailer's stores, title passes from the company to the key retailer. At that time, the company invoices the key retailer and recognizes revenue for these consignment transactions. The company does not offer a right of return for products shipped to the key retailer's stores from the seasonal distribution centers. The amount of consignment inventory as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $12,819 and $11,103, respectively.

Revenue earned from service and maintenance contracts is recognized ratably over the contractual period. Revenue from extended warranty programs is deferred at the time the contract is sold and amortized into net sales using the straight-line method over the extended warranty period.

Sales Promotions and Incentives

At the time of sale, the company records an estimate for sales promotion and incentive costs. Examples of sales promotion and incentive programs include rebate programs on certain professional products sold to distributors, volume discounts, retail financing support, cooperative advertising, commissions, and other sales discounts and promotional programs. The estimates of sales promotion and incentive costs are based on the terms of the arrangements with customers, historical payment experience, field inventory levels, volume purchases, and expectations for changes in relevant trends in the future. The expense of each program is either classified as a reduction from gross sales or as a component of selling, general, and administrative expense.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales primarily comprises direct materials and supplies consumed in the manufacture of product, as well as manufacturing labor, depreciation expense, and direct overhead expense necessary to convert purchased materials and supplies into finished product. Cost of sales also includes inbound freight costs, outbound freight costs for shipping products to customers, obsolescence expense, cost of services provided, and cash discounts on payments to vendors.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense

Selling, general, and administrative expense primarily comprises payroll and benefit costs, occupancy and operating costs of distribution and corporate facilities, warranty expense, depreciation and amortization expense on non-manufacturing assets, advertising and marketing expenses, selling expenses, engineering and research costs, information systems costs, incentive and profit sharing expense, and other miscellaneous administrative costs, such as legal costs for internal and outside services that are expensed as incurred.

Cost of Financing Distributor/Dealer Inventory

The company enters into limited inventory repurchase agreements with a third party financing companies.company and Red Iron. The company has repurchased immaterial amounts of inventory from third party financing companiesunder these repurchase agreements over the last three fiscal years. However, an adverse change in retail sales could cause this situation to change and thereby require Torothe company to repurchase a portion of financed product. See Note 1213 for additional information regarding the company’scompany's repurchase arrangements.

Included as a reduction to net sales are costs associated with programs under which the company shares the expense of financing distributor and dealer inventories, referred to as floor plan expenses. This charge represents interest for a pre-established length of time based on a predefined rate from a contract with a third party financing sourcesources to finance distributor and dealer inventory purchases. These financing arrangements are used by the company as a marketing tool to assist customers to buy inventory. The financing costs for distributor and dealer inventories were $13,559, $13,952,$14,490, $9,452, and $11,866$12,597 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively.

Advertising

General advertising expenditures and the related production costs are expensed in the period incurred or the first time advertising takes place. Cooperative advertising represents expenditures for shared advertising costs that the company reimburses to customers. These obligations are accrued and expensed when the related revenues are recognized in accordance with the programs established for various product lines. Advertising costs were $39,877, $44,134,$39,281, $33,496, and $42,827$43,137 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The company accounts for stock-based compensation awards in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004),


“Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services through stock-based payment transactions and requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for the award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award as of the date of grant. The company’scompany's stock-based compensation awards include performance shares issued to key employees that are contingent on the achievement of performance goals of the company, as well as non-qualified options.stock options and limited restricted stock awards. Compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value is recognized for these awards over the vesting period. See Note 910 for additional information regarding stock-based compensation plans.


Net Earnings Per Share

Basic net earnings per share is calculated using net earnings available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year plus the assumed issuance of contingent shares. Diluted net earnings per share is similar to basic net earnings per share except that the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the assumed issuance of contingent shares is increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of all potentially dilutive shares, such as common stock to be issued upon exercise of options, contingently issuable shares, and non-vested restricted shares.

Reconciliations of basic and diluted weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding are as follows:

BASIC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

(Shares in thousands)
Fiscal years ended October 31

 


2007

 


2006

 


2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock

 

40,661

 

42,848

 

44,679

 

 32,980 35,784 37,730 

Assumed issuance of contingent shares

 

21

 

39

 

35

 

 2 4 6 
 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock and assumed issuance of contingent shares

 

40,682

 

42,887

 

44,714

 

 32,982 35,788 37,736 
 

DILUTED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

(Shares in thousands)
Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock and assumed issuance of contingent shares

 

40,682

 

42,887

 

44,714

 

 32,982 35,788 37,736 

Effect of dilutive securities

 

1,182

 

1,457

 

1,825

 

 455 452 843 
 

Weighted-average number of shares of common stock, assumed issuance of contingent and restricted shares, and effect of dilutive securities

 

41,864

 

44,344

 

46,539

 

 33,437 36,240 38,579 
 

   Options to purchase an aggregate of 330,555, 1,406,871, and 763,802 shares of common stock outstanding during fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net earnings per share calculation because their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the company's common stock during the same respective periods.

Cash Flow Presentation

The consolidated statements of cash flows are prepared using the indirect method which reconciles net earnings to cash flow from operating activities. The necessary adjustments include the removal of timing differences between the occurrence of operating receipts and payments and their recognition in net earnings. The adjustments also remove from operating activities cash flows arising from investing and financing activities, which are presented separately from operating activities. Cash flows from foreign currency transactions and operations are translated at an average exchange rate for the period. Cash paid for acquisitions is classified as investing activities.

Statement of Stockholders’Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income Information

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of October 31 were as follows:

 

 2010 2009 2008 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

$ (2,713

)

$ 7,044

 

$ 9,842

 

 $3,008 $2,368 $15,654 

Adjustment related to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, net of tax

 

1,484

 

 

 

Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax

 

184

 

225

 

2,302

 

Adjustments to employee retirement benefits, net of tax

 3,261 3,942 1,309 

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments, net of tax

 

3,942

 

(420

)

(563

)

 2,793 3,093 (8,419)
 

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$ 2,897

 

$ 6,849

 

$ 11,581

 

 $9,062 $9,403 $8,544 
 

New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In September 2006,April 2008, the SecuritiesFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued revised guidance on determining the useful life of intangible assets. The revised guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The revised guidance applies to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “Consideringboth intangible assets acquired in business combinations and asset acquisitions. The company adopted this revised guidance on November 1, 2009, as required and the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (SAB No. 108). Due to diversity in practice among registrants, SAB No. 108 expresses SEC staff views regarding the process by which misstatements in financial statements are evaluated for purposes of determining whether financial statement restatement is necessary. We adopted the provisions of SAB No. 108 as of October 31, 2007, as required. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have anonly has a prospective impact on our consolidatedits financial position or results of operations.

In October 2006,December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accountingguidance for Defined Benefit Pensionbusiness combinations that requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and Other Postretirement Plans.” SFAS No. 158 requires employers to recognize on their balance sheets the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans. In addition, employers will recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income, changes in the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plans, such as actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs that arise during the year but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS No. 158 will require the measurement date of plan assets and benefit obligations to be as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 158, which require the funded status of pension and other postretirement benefit plansgoodwill acquired to be recorded at full fair value. It also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The company adopted this new guidance for any business combination occurring on the balance sheet as of October 31, 2007, as required, and we will adopt the provisions that require the


measurement date of plan assets and benefit obligations to be the same as our fiscal year end as of October 31,or after November 1, 2009, as required. The effectsadoption of adopting the provisionsnew guidance did not have a material impact on the company's financial position or results of SFAS No. 158operations.

   In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance that establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB deferred the implementation for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The company adopted the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not required to be measured on our consolidated balance sheeta recurring basis during the first quarter of fiscal 2010, as required, and for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the second quarter of October 31, 2007 are presented infiscal 2010, as required. The adoption of the following table.guidance had no impact on the company's financial position or results of operations.



 

Prior to
Adopting
SFAS No. 158

 

Effect of
Adopting
SFAS No. 158

 

As Reported
as of October
31, 2007

 

Deferred income taxes – current portion

 

 

$ 58,307

 

 

$ (493

)

 

$ 57,814

 

Deferred income taxes – long-term portion

 

 

3,637

 

 

1,548

 

 

5,185

 

Other assets

 

 

10,249

 

 

(1,096

)

 

9,153

 

Total assets

 

 

950,878

 

 

(41

)

 

950,837

 

Accrued liabilities – compensation and benefit costs

 

 

60,019

 

 

1,443

 

 

61,462

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

340,027

 

 

1,443

 

 

341,470

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(1,413

)

 

(1,484

)

 

(2,897

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

 

371,922

 

 

(1,484

)

 

370,438

 


2

BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURE

On August 16, 2007,October 29, 2010, the company completed the acquisition of Rain Master Irrigation Systems,certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of one of its independent U.S. Western-based distribution companies. On April 30, 2010, the company completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities from USPraxis, Inc. (Rain Master), a manufacturer of irrigation central controllersstump grinders, wood chippers, and other productslog splitters for rental centers and landscape professionals. On December 1, 2009, the commercial landscape market, with annual salescompany's wholly owned domestic distribution company completed the acquisition of approximately $10,000.certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of one of the company's independent U.S. Midwestern-based distribution companies. The aggregate estimated net purchase price of these acquisitions during fiscal 2010 was $9,137, which included cash payments, the issuance of a long-term note, and an estimated earnout consideration.

   On October 13, 2009, the company completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities for Ty-Crop Manufacturing Ltd., a leading manufacturer of topdressing and material handling equipment for golf course and sports fields applications. The purchase price was $17,882,$7,900, with $11,882$6,400 paid in cash and $6,000$1,500 in a long-term note. During the first quarter of long-term notes issued.fiscal 2009, the company also completed the sale of a portion of the operations of its company-owned distributorship.

On January 19, 2007,October 10, 2008, the company completed the purchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Allen Hover Mower. Allen Hover Mower sells walk power mowers worldwide that are specifically designed to perform well on steep inclines for the golf course and grounds maintenance market, with annual salesSouthern Green, Inc., a leading manufacturer of approximately $2,000.

deep-tine aeration equipment. On February 8, 2005,December 6, 2007, the company completed the acquisitionpurchase of certain assets and assumed certain liabilitiesTurf Guard wireless monitoring technology from JLH Labs, LLC, a leader in wireless soil monitoring technology. In accordance with the terms of Hayter Limited (Hayter). Hayter designs, manufactures, and markets residential and professional turf maintenance equipment primarily for the United Kingdom market, with annual salesasset purchase agreement, as amended, the company may be obligated to make earn-out payments to JLH Labs, LLC over the six-year period ending October 31, 2013 based on the financial results of approximately $50,000.Turf Guard systems.

   The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions during fiscal 2008 was $35,285, which was$7,560, with $4,430 paid in cash and included $31,043 of current assets; $10,585 of property, plant, and equipment; $7,188 of intangible assets; and $13,531 of assumed liabilities.$3,130 in long-term notes.

The purchase price of these acquisitions was allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of their fair value, with the excess purchase price for business acquisitions recorded as goodwill. These acquisitions were immaterial based on the company’scompany's consolidated financial condition and results of operations. See Note 45 for further details related to the acquired intangible assets.

3

INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE

On August 12, 2009, the company and TCFIF, a subsidiary of TCF National Bank, established Red Iron as a joint venture to provide inventory financing, including floor plan and open account receivable financing, to distributors and dealers of the company's products in the U.S. and to select distributors of the company's products in Canada. The initial term of Red Iron will continue until October 31, 2014, subject to unlimited automatic two-year extensions thereafter. Either the company or TCFIF may elect not to extend the initial term or any subsequent term by giving one-year notice to the other party of its intention not to extend the term. Additionally, in connection with the joint venture, the company and an affiliate of TCFIF entered into an arrangement to provide inventory financing to dealers of the company's products in Canada. In connection with the establishment of Red Iron, the company terminated its agreement with a third party financing company that previously provided floor plan financing to dealers of the company's products in the U.S. and Canada. During the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Red Iron began financing open account receivables, as well as floor plan receivables previously financed by such third party financing company. Red Iron also began financing floor plan receivables during the company's fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.

   The company sold to Red Iron certain inventory receivables, including floor plan and open account receivables, from distributors and dealers of the company's products, at a purchase price equal to the face value of the receivables. The initial transactions occurred during the company's fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 and included the sale of the company's floor plan receivables in the aggregate amount of $72,757. A subsequent transaction occurred during the company's first quarter of fiscal 2010 and included the sale of open account receivables for customers whose floor plan receivables were sold to Red Iron in October 2009, as well as for customers whose floor plan receivables were previously financed by a third party financing company, in the aggregate amount of $18,108. As the company sold receivables to Red Iron, the company derecognized receivables from its books upon receipt of cash from Red Iron for receivables sold. Red Iron purchased $804,083 of receivables from the company during fiscal 2010.

   On October 29, 2010, the company and Red Iron amended their repurchase agreement under which Red Iron provides financing for certain dealers and distributors. Instead of transactions under the agreements being characterized as a sale of receivables from the company to Red Iron, the transactions are structured as an advance in the form of a payment by Red Iron to the company on behalf of a distributor or dealer with respect to invoices financed by Red Iron that extinguishes the obligation of the dealer or distributor to make payment to the company under the terms of the invoice. Under separate agreements between Red Iron and the dealers


and distributors, Red Iron provides loans to the dealers and distributors for the advances paid by Red Iron to the company.

   The company owns 45 percent of Red Iron and TCFIF owns 55 percent of Red Iron. The company accounts for its investment in Red Iron under the equity method of accounting. Red Iron is managed through a management committee consisting of eight persons, four of whom are designated by the company and four of whom are designated by TCFIF. Each of the company and TCFIF contributed a specified amount of the estimated cash required to enable Red Iron to purchase the company's inventory financing receivables and to provide financial support for Red Iron's inventory financing programs. Red Iron borrows the remaining requisite estimated cash utilizing a $450,000 secured revolving credit facility established under a credit agreement between Red Iron and TCFIF. The company's total investment in Red Iron as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $9,693 and $3,535, respectively. The company has not guaranteed the outstanding indebtedness of Red Iron. The company has agreed to repurchase products repossessed by Red Iron and the TCFIF Canadian affiliate, up to a maximum aggregate amount of $7,500 in a calendar year. In addition, the company has provided recourse to Red Iron for certain outstanding receivables, which amounted to a maximum amount of $731 and $4,529 as of October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

   As of October 31, 2010 and 2009, Red Iron's total assets were $190,732 and $65,894, respectively and total liabilities were $169,193 and $58,038, respectively. Red Iron's net income for fiscal 2010 was $5,850 and Red Iron's net loss for fiscal 2009 was $613.

4OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET

Other income (expense) is as follows:

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Interest income

 

$ 3,148

 

$ 1,433

 

$ 1,519

 

 $1,056 $898 $1,856 

Gross finance charge revenue

 

1,791

 

2,557

 

2,991

 

  543 1,032 

Retail financing revenue

 

1,786

 

2,257

 

2,275

 

 779 1,716 2,717 

Royalty and licensing income

 

 

 

743

 

Foreign currency exchange rate gain (loss)

 

1,330

 

961

 

(791

)

 813 641 (5,041)

Loss on sale of a business

 

 

 

(775

)

Equity losses from investments

 

(361

)

(1,559

)

(1,468

)

Litigation recovery

 

50

 

862

 

65

 

Equity income (losses) from investments

 2,599 (136) (859)

Litigation recovery (settlements), net

 57 (6,811) 1,025 

Miscellaneous

 

1,279

 

1,039

 

720

 

 1,811 1,318 1,483 

Total

 

$ 9,023

 

$ 7,550

 

$ 5,279

 

 

Total other income (expense), net

 $7,115 $(1,831)$2,213 
 

4

5GOODWILL AND OTHER
INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for fiscal 20072010 and 20062009 were as follows:



 

Professional
Segment

 

Residential
Segment

 


Total

 

Balance as of October 31, 2005

 

 

$ 70,801

 

 

$ 10,396

 

$ 81,197

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

147

 

 

125

 

272

 

Balance as of October 31, 2006

 

 

$ 70,948

 

 

$ 10,521

 

$ 81,469

 

Goodwill acquired

 

 

4,290

 

 

 

4,290

 

Translation adjustment

 

 

219

 

 

246

 

465

 

Balance as of October 31, 2007

 

 

75,457

 

 

$ 10,767

 

86,224

 

  

  Professional
Segment
  Residential
Segment
  Total 
  

Balance as of October 31, 2008

 $75,456 $10,736 $86,192 

Translation adjustment

  58  157  215 
  

Balance as of October 31, 2009

 $75,514 $10,893 $86,407 

Translation and other adjustments

  (92) 85  (7)
  

Balance as of October 31, 2010

 $75,422 $10,978 $86,400 
  

   

Other Intangible Assets Total other intangible assets, net as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 were $14,675 and $5,225, respectively. As of October 31, 2007 and 2006, the company also had $2,910 and $2,671, respectively, of non-amortizable intangible assets related to the Hayter brand name, which was acquired in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2007, the company added $2,800 of non-amortizable intangible assets related to the Rain Master trade name, which was acquired in fiscal 2007.

The components of other amortizable intangible assets were as follows:

October 31, 2007

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

 

October 31, 2010

 Estimated
Life
(Years)
 Gross
Carrying
Amount
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net 
 

Patents

 

 

$ 6,553

 

 

$ (6,155

)

 5-13 $8,703 $(7,034)$1,669 

Non-compete agreements

 

 

1,400

 

 

(938

)

 2-10 3,039 (1,910) 1,129 

Customer-related

 

 

6,655

 

 

(504

)

 6-13 7,471 (2,061) 5,410 

Developed technology

 

 

3,490

 

 

(1,536

)

 2-10 13,984 (4,511) 9,473 

Other

 

 

800

 

 

(800

)

   800 (800)  

Total

 

 

$ 18,898

 

 

$ (9,933

)

 

Total amortizable

   33,997 (16,316) 17,681 
 

Non-amortizable – trade name

   5,281  5,281 
 

Total other intangible assets, net

   $39,278 $(16,316)$22,962 
 

 


  

October 31, 2009

  Estimated
Life
(Years)
  Gross
Carrying
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net 
  

Patents

  5-13 $8,654 $(6,641)$2,013 

Non-compete agreements

  2-10  2,839  (1,517) 1,322 

Customer-related

  10-13  6,549  (1,458) 5,091 

Developed technology

  2-10  12,799  (3,182) 9,617 

Other

     800  (800)  
  

Total amortizable

     31,641  (13,598) 18,043 
  

Non-amortizable – trade name

     5,281    5,281 
  

Total other intangible assets, net

    $36,922 $(13,598)$23,324 
  

   

October 31, 2006

 

Gross Carrying
Amount

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Patents

 

 

$ 6,553

 

 

$ (5,964

)

Non-compete agreements

 

 

1,000

 

 

(885

)

Customer-related

 

 

1,336

 

 

(234

)

Developed technology

 

 

1,563

 

 

(815

)

Other

 

 

800

 

 

(800

)

Total

 

 

$ 11,252

 

 

$ (8,698

)

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008 was $1,200, $864,$2,903, $2,504, and $770,$1,938, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the succeeding fiscal years is as follows: 2008, $1,493; 2009, $1,147; 2010, $854; 2011, $780;$2,852; 2012, $747;$2,816; 2013, $2,623; 2014, $2,288; 2015, $2,115; and after 2012, $3,944.2015, $4,987.


5

6SHORT-TERM CAPITAL RESOURCES

TheAs of October 31, 2010, the company hashad a $175,000$225,000 unsecured senior five-year revolving credit facility whichthat expires in January 2012. WeThe company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of October 31, 2007 and 2006.2010 or 2009. Interest expense on this credit line is determined based on a LIBOR rate plus a basis point spread defined in the credit agreement. The company had no outstanding short-term debt as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 under this line of credit. On November 9, 2010, the company amended the terms of its credit agreement to better match its financing needs to its ongoing capital requirements. The amendment included the following changes: (i) replace the debt-to-capitalization covenant with a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") covenant that shall not exceed 3.25 to 1.00 for any four-quarter period; (ii) remove language that prohibits the company from repurchasing its own debt; and (iii) reduce the total amount of the credit line from $225,000 to $175,000. This amendment provides the company more flexibility in the deployment of its capital, while reducing ongoing costs to maintain the amount of credit required for ongoing operations. In addition, the company’scompany's non-U.S. operations maintain unsecured short-term lines of credit in the aggregate amount of $16,069.$18,785. These facilities bear interest at various rates depending on the rates in their respective countries of operation. The company had $372 and $320$776 of outstanding short-term debt as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,2010 under these lines of credit. The weighted-average interest rate onIn addition, the company had $258 and $4,529 in short-term debt outstandingfor certain receivables the company has provided recourse with Red Iron as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006 was 6.89 percent and 6.15 percent,2009, respectively. The company was in compliance with all covenants related to the several lines of credit described above as of October 31, 2007.2010 and 2009.

6

7LONG-TERM DEBT

A summary of long-term debt as of October 31 is as follows:

 

2007

 

2006

 

7.125% Notes, due June 15, 2007

 

$          

 

$ 75,000

 

 

 2010 2009 
 

7.800% Debentures, due June 15, 2027

 

100,000

 

100,000

 

 $100,000 $100,000 

6.625% Senior Notes, due May 1, 2037

 

123,172

 

 

 123,358 123,296 

Other

 

6,037

 

 

 2,190 5,515 

 

229,209

 

175,000

 

 

Total long-term debt

 225,548 228,811 

Less current portion

 

1,611

 

 

 1,970 3,765 
 

Long-term debt, less current portion

 

$ 227,598

 

$ 175,000

 

 $223,578 $225,046 
 

   

As of October 31, 2006, the company had $75,000 of notes due on June 15, 2007 that were classified as long-term debt as the company had the ability and intent to refinance the obligation on a long-term basis. The notes were repaid at maturity during fiscal 2007.

On April 26, 2007, the company issued $125,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% senior notes due May 1, 2037. The senior notes were priced at 98.513% of par value, and the resulting discount of $1,859 associated with the issuance of these senior notes is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest rate method. The underwriting fee and direct debt issue costs totaling $1,524 will be amortized over the life of the notes. Although the coupon rate of the senior notes is 6.625%, the effective interest rate is 6.741% after taking into account the issuance discount. Interest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The senior notes are unsecured senior obligations of the company and rank equally with ourthe company's other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The indentures under which the senior notes were issued contain customary covenants and event of default provisions. The company may redeem some or all of the senior notes at any time at the greater of the full principal amount of the senior notes being redeemed or the present value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the treasury rate plus 30 basis points, plus, in both cases, accrued and unpaid interest. In the event of the occurrence of both (i) a change of control of the company, and (ii) a downgrade of the notes below an investment grade rating by both Moody’sMoody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’sPoor's Ratings Services within a specified period, the company would be required to make an offer to purchase the senior notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of the senior notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. The proceeds from the issuance of the senior notes were used to repay the $75,000 outstanding principal amount of 7.125% notes on the maturity date of June 15, 2007 as well as for general corporate purposes.

In connection with the issuance in June 1997 of the $175,000 in long-term debt securities, the company paid $23,688 to terminate three forward-starting interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $125,000. These swap agreements had been entered into to reduce exposure to interest rate risk prior to the issuance of the new long-term debt securities. As of the inception of one of the swap agreements, the company had received payments that were recorded as deferred income to be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the new debt securities. As of the date the swaps were terminated, this deferred income totaled $18,710. The excess termination fees over the deferred income recorded has been deferred and is being recognized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the debt securities issued.

Principal payments required on long-term debt in each of the next five fiscal years ending October 31 are as follows: 2008, $1,611; 2009, $1,911; 2010, $2,012; 2011, $503;$1,970; 2012, $220; 2013, $0; 2014, $0; 2015, $0; and after 2012,2015, $225,000.

49




7

STOCKHOLDERS’8STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Stock repurchase program – program.The company’scompany's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of shares of the company’scompany's common stock as follows:

·  In March 2004, 1,000,000 shares

·

In May 2004, 2,000,0002008, 4,000,000 shares

·  In September 2004, 1,000,000 shares, which was doubled to 2,000,000 shares as a result of a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005

·

In July 2005, 2,000,0002009, 5,000,000 shares

·  In July 2006, 3,000,000 shares

·  In May 2007, 3,000,000 shares


During fiscal 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, the company paid $182,843, $146,543,$135,777, $115,283, and $156,972$110,355 to repurchase an aggregate of 3,342,729 shares, 3,369,2852,678,474, 3,316,536 shares, and 3,922,8052,809,927 shares, respectively. As of October 31, 2007, 1,134,1752010, 1,329,238 shares remained authorized for repurchase.

   On December 1, 2010, the company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 3,000,000 shares of its common stock in open-market or privately negotiated transactions. This repurchase authorization has no expiration date but may be terminated by the company's Board of Directors at any time.

Shareholder rights plan –plan.Under   On June 14, 2008, the terms of a Rights Agreement, dated as of May 20, 1998, as amended, between Torothe company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, each share ofand the company’s common stock entitles its holder to onerelated preferred share purchase right. These rights, become exercisable only if a person or group acquires, or announces a tender offer that would result in, ownership of 15 percent or more of Toro’s common stock. Each right will then entitle the holder to buy a one four-hundredth interest in a share of a series of preferred stock, at a price of $180 per one one-hundredth of a preferred share. Among other things under the plan, if a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of Toro’s outstanding common stock, each right entitles its holder (other than the acquiring person or group) to purchase the number of shares of common stock of Toro having a market value of twice the exercise price of the right. The Board of Directors may redeem the rights for $0.0025 per right at any time before a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the common stock. The rights expire at the close of business on June 14, 2008, unless extended or earlier redeemed or exchanged.expired by their terms.

Treasury shares –shares.As of October 31, 2007,2010, the company had 16,081,38922,637,278 treasury shares at a cost of $593,290.$876,620. As of October 31, 2006,2009, the company had 13,676,50620,662,734 treasury shares at a cost of $441,190.$764,015.

8

9INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the company’scompany's consolidated effective tax rate is summarized as follows:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

 

35.0

%

35.0

%

35.0

%

Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits from export incentives

 

(0.1

)

(1.3

)

(1.7

)

Domestic manufacturer’s deduction

 

(0.5

)

(0.5

)

 

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

 

1.7

 

1.4

 

1.0

 

Effect of foreign source income

 

(1.2

)

(0.8

)

(0.3

)

Other, net

 

(1.7

)

(0.8

)

(1.0

)

Consolidated effective tax rate

 

33.2

%

33.0

%

33.0

%

  

Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010  2009  2008 
  

Statutory federal income tax rate

  35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:

          
  

Domestic manufacturer's deduction

  (1.1) (0.8) (1.2)
  

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

  1.4  1.2  1.7 
  

Effect of foreign source income

  0.2  0.1  0.4 
  

Other, net

  (1.5) (1.1) (1.9)
  

Consolidated effective tax rate

  34.0% 34.4% 34.0%
  

   

Components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Provision for income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

59,941

 

$

57,285

 

$

58,420

 

State

 

5,501

 

4,115

 

3,329

 

Non-U.S.

 

5,812

 

3,262

 

1,209

 

Current provision

 

$

71,254

 

$

64,662

 

$

62,958

 

Deferred –

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

1,837

 

$

(523

)

$

(5,953

)

State

 

137

 

175

 

(671

)

Non-U.S.

 

(2,437

)

(705

)

(144

)

Deferred benefit

 

(463

)

(1,053

)

(6,768

)

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

70,791

 

$

63,609

 

$

56,190

 

  

Fiscal years ended October 31

  2010  2009  2008 
  

Provision for income taxes:

          

Current –

          
 

Federal

 $34,582 $23,954 $57,211 
 

State

  2,918  1,951  4,456 
 

Non-U.S.

  4,436  4,972  1,488 
  
 

Current provision

 $41,936 $30,877 $63,155 
  

Deferred –

          
 

Federal

 $5,305 $1,948 $(3,229)
 

State

  198  (110) 383 
 

Non-U.S.

  592  236  1,329 
  
 

Deferred benefit

  6,095  2,074  (1,517)
  

Total provision for income taxes

 $48,031 $32,951 $61,638 
  

   

As of October 31, 2007,2010, the company hashad net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $2,757$5,988 in foreign jurisdictions with expiration periods ranging from seven years to unlimited.unlimited expiration.

Earnings before income taxes were as follows:

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Earnings before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes:

 

U.S.

 

$

198,274

 

$

180,734

 

$

165,536

 

Non-U.S.

 

14,953

 

12,020

 

4,736

 

U.S.

 $127,508 $83,357 $175,172 

Non-U.S.

 13,760 12,431 6,117 
 

Total

 

$

213,227

 

$

192,754

 

$

170,272

 

Total

 $141,268 $95,788 $181,289 
 

   

During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively, $13,775, $13,131,$3,397, $7,403, and $5,989$3,522 was added to stockholders’stockholders' equity reflecting the permanent book to tax difference in accounting for tax benefits related to employee stock-based award transactions.


The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred income tax assets are presented below:

October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

Deferred Tax Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

2,147

 

$

1,688

 

Inventory items

 

1,260

 

744

 

Warranty reserves and other accruals

 

34,705

 

30,053

 

Employee benefits

 

21,619

 

18,885

 

Depreciation

 

4,094

 

1,862

 

Other

 

1,829

 

7,386

 

Deferred tax assets

 

$

65,654

 

$

60,618

 

Valuation allowance

 

(2,655

)

(2,910

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

62,999

 

$

57,708

 

  

October 31

  2010  2009 
  

Deferred tax assets (liabilities):

       
 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $1,865 $2,062 
 

Inventory items

  1,750  (1,837)
 

Warranty reserves and other accruals

  40,156  37,643 
 

Employee benefits

  16,159  17,081 
 

Depreciation

  (2,411) 168 
 

Other

  7,399  12,833 
  

Deferred tax assets

 $64,918 $67,950 
 

Valuation allowance

  (4,538) (4,898)
  

Net deferred tax assets

 $60,380 $63,052 
  

   

The valuation allowance as of October 31, 20072010 and 2009 principally applies to unexpired capital loss carryforwards.carryforwards and foreign net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to expire prior to utilization.

As of October 31, 2007,2010, the company had approximately $27,022$44,624 of accumulated undistributed earnings from subsidiaries outside the United States that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely. No deferred tax liability has been provided for such earnings.

   A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

  

Balance as of October 31, 2009

 $5,264 

Increase as a result of tax positions
taken during a prior period

  712 

Increase as a result of tax positions
taken during the current period

  259 

Decrease relating to settlements with taxing authorities

  (386)

Reduction as a result of a lapse
of the applicable statute of limitations

  (97)
  

Balance as of October 31, 2010

 $5,752 
  

   Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of October 31, 2010 are potential benefits of $4,278 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate from continuing operations.

   The company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of the provision for income taxes. In addition to the liability of $5,752 for unrecognized tax benefits as of October 31, 2010 was an amount of approximately $1,049 for accrued interest and penalties. To the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, the amounts accrued will be revised and reflected as an adjustment to the provision for income taxes.

   The company anticipates that total unrecognized tax benefits will not change significantly within the next 12 months.

   The company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of numerous state and foreign jurisdictions. The company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for taxable years before fiscal 2008 and with limited exceptions, state and foreign income tax examinations for fiscal years before 2006.

9

10STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

Under the company’s stockcompany's equity-based compensation plans, option plans, certain employees and non-employee directors have beenawards are granted options to purchase shares of common stock at priceswith an exercise price equal to the fair market valueclosing price of the company’scompany's common stock on the date the option was granted. A majority of these awards are non-qualified options, and for certain non-officer employees, the options vest after two years from the date of grant, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange. Options are generally granted to non-employee directors, officers, and have a five-year contractual term. Other options granted duringother key employees in the first quarter of the company's fiscal 2007year. Option awards generally vest one-third each year over a three-year period and have a ten-year contractual term. The company also issues limited restricted stock awards with varying vesting terms. Compensation expense equal to the grant date fair value is generally recognized for these awards over the vesting period. The numberHowever, if a non-employee director has served on the company's Board of unissued sharesDirectors for ten full fiscal years or longer, the fair value of common stock available for future grants under the company’s stock-based compensation plans was 527,296options granted is fully expensed as of October 31, 2007.

In 1999, the company’s stockholders approved,date of the grant. Similarly, options granted to officers and in March 2007, the company’s stockholders re-approved, a long-term incentive plan called The Toro Company Performance Share Plan. Under this plan,other key employees are also subject to accelerated expensing if the option holder meets the retirement definition set forth in the applicable equity-based compensation plan. In that case, the fair value of the options is expensed in the year of grant because the option holder must be employed as of the end of the fiscal year in which the options are granted in order for the option to continue to vest following retirement.

   The company also grants to key employees long-term performance share awards pursuant to which they are entitled to the right to receive shares of common stock or deferred common stockperformance share units contingent on the achievement of performance goals of the company, which are generally measured over a three-year period. The number of shares of common stock a participant receives will be increased (up to 200 percent of target levels) or reduced (down to zero) based on the level of achievement of performance goals and vest over a three-year period. Performance share awards are granted in the first quarter of the company's fiscal year. Compensation expense is recognized for these awards on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the fair value as of the date of grant and the probability of achieving performance goals.

   The number of unissued shares of common stock available for future equity-based grants under the company’s Performance Share Plancompany's equity-based compensation plans was 832,4482,747,525 as of October 31, 2007.2010.

A summary of activity under the plans previously described is presented below:

 

 

Options
Outstanding

 

Price1

 

Life2

 

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

 

Performance
Shares
Potentially
Issuable

 

Outstanding as of November 1, 2006

 

 

3,012,899

 

$

21.48

 

 

4.7

 

 

$

65,334

 

 

580,000

 

Granted

 

 

441,752

 

44.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127,600

 

Exercised /earned

 

 

(662,334

)

19.58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(205,765

)

Cancelled/forfeited

 

 

(17,985

)

42.34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(75,435

)

Outstanding as of October 31, 2007

 

 

2,774,332

 

$

25.52

 

 

4.6

 

 

$

83,624

 

 

426,400

 

Exercisable as of October 31, 2007

 

 

1,930,248

 

$

18.21

 

 

3.9

 

 

$

72,294

 

 

 

  

  Options
Outstanding
  Price1  Life2  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  Performance
Shares
Potentially
Issuable
 
  

Outstanding as of October 31, 2009

  2,231,025 $36.20  4.7 $11,979  344,868 

Granted

  390,958  40.42        119,200 

Exercised/earned

  (509,328) 32.18        (20,104)

Cancelled/forfeited

  (19,421) 42.54        (102,964)
             

Outstanding as of October 31, 2010

  2,093,234 $37.91  5.4 $39,461  341,000 
  

Exercisable as of October 31, 2010

  1,396,770 $38.03  3.9 $26,157   
  

1
Weighted-average exercise price

2
Weighted-average contractual life in years

Total stock-based compensation expense for these plans was $7,293, $6,269,$6,442, $4,116, and $9,145$5,684 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the stock price exceeded the strike price of the option on the date of exercise) that were exercised during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008 was $35,752, $37,469,$8,198, $18,394, and $20,674,$8,398, respectively.

The table below presents the non-vestedunvested options and performance share awards as of October 31, 2007,2010 and changes during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007:2010:

Options and shares

 


Stock
Options

 

Weighted-
Average
Fair Value
at date
of grant

 


Performance
Shares

 

Weighted-
Average
Fair Value
at date
of grant

 

Non-vested as of November 1, 2006

 

902,127

 

 

$

10.64

 

 

580,000

 

 

$

31.84

 

 

  Stock
Options
 Weighted-
Average
Fair Value
at Date
of Grant
 Performance
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Fair Value
at Date
of Grant
 
 

Unvested as of October 31, 2009

 717,326 $10.76 344,868 $42.25 

Granted

 

441,752

 

 

12.32

 

 

127,600

 

 

44.90

 

 390,958 12.33 119,200 40.73 

Vested/earned

 

(481,810

)

 

10.30

 

 

(205,765

)

 

24.16

 

 (405,449) 11.45 (20,104) 44.90 

Forfeited/cancelled

 

(17,985

)

 

8.62

 

 

(75,435

)

 

24.16

 

 (6,371) 10.18 (102,964) 44.90 

Non-vested as of October 31, 2007

 

844,084

 

 

$

11.76

 

 

426,400

 

 

$

40.81

 

       

Unvested as of October 31, 2010

 696,464 $11.25 341,000 $40.87 
 

   

As of October 31, 2007,2010, there was $2,332$2,189 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vestedunvested stock option compensation arrangements granted under the company’s plans.arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. As of October 31, 2007,2010, there was $2,298$3,469 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vestedunvested performance share compensation arrangements granted under the company’s plan.arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.81.9 years.


The fair value of each share-based option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation method that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. The expected life is a significant assumption as it determines the period for which the risk-free interest rate, volatility, and dividend yield must be applied. The expected life is the average length of time over which thethat non-employee director and employee groups are expected to exercise their options, which is based on historical experience with similar grants. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Expected volatilities are based on the movement of the company’scompany's common stock price over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life at the time of grant. Dividend yield is estimated over the expected life based on the company’scompany's dividend policy, historical cash dividends paid, expected increase in future cash dividends, and expected increasechanges in the company’scompany's stock price.

The following table illustrates the valuation assumptions of stock-based compensation in the following fiscal years.

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008

Stock option valuation assumptions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected life of option in years

 

3 – 6.5

 

2.5 – 6.5

 

3 – 7

 

 6 6 3 – 6.5

Expected volatility

 

25.0% – 26.4

%

25.3% – 27.0

%

25.9% – 30.4

%

 33.0% – 33.1% 30.6% 24.8% – 25.8%

Weighted-average volatility

 

25.65

%

26.13

%

28.04

%

 33.0% 30.60% 25.26%

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.42% – 4.53

%

4.40% – 4.53

%

3.22% – 4.04

%

 2.51% – 2.87% 2.26% – 3.16% 3.10% – 4.08%

Expected dividend yield

 

0.78% – 0.90

%

0.65% – 0.70

%

0.18% – 0.25

%

 1.52% – 1.68% 1.53% – 1.81% 0.92% – 0.95%

Weighted-average dividend yield

 

0.84

%

0.67

%

0.22

%

 1.54% 1.79% 0.94%

Grant date weighted-average fair value of stock options

 

$12.32

 

$10.94

 

$11.14

 

 $12.33 $7.93 $13.87

Performance share grant date fair value

 

$44.90

 

$41.44

 

$37.02

 

 $40.73 $28.62 $58.96

On July 31, 1995, the company issued 68,968 shares of restricted stock and 68,968 performance units to its former Chief Executive Officer under the terms of The Toro Company Chief Executive Officer Succession Incentive Award Agreement, which was approved by the company’s stockholders in 1994. The value of each performance unit was equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock. The restricted stock and performance units were to vest based upon achievement of specified succession planning goals. For each of fiscal 2000 and 1999, 10,480 shares and 10,480 performance units vested. During fiscal 2005, the remaining 48,908 restricted shares and 48,908 performance units vested due to the completion of the succession planning goals. Compensation expense related to this plan was $372 and $167 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

10

11EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS

The company maintains The Toro Company Investment, Savings, and Employee Stock Ownership Plan for eligible employees. The company’scompany's expenses under this plan were $17,170, $15,150,$15,500, $15,200, and $14,780$16,150 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively.

The company also sponsors a plan that provides health-care benefits to eligible employees upon retirement, up to age 65. The health-care benefit plan is contributory, with retiree contributions based on active employee participation rates. The company funds these benefits for retirees on an annual basis. The company uses fiscal year end as the measurement date for this plan.

Reconciliation of the funded status of this plan is as follows:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

Projected Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning obligations

 

$

8,914

 

$

9,172

 

Service cost

 

378

 

381

 

Interest cost

 

495

 

510

 

Actuarial loss (gain)

 

129

 

(626

)

Benefits paid

 

(654

)

(523

)

Ending obligations

 

$

9,262

 

$

8,914

 

Funded Status of Plan

 

$

(9,262

)

$

(8,914

)

Unrecognized prior service credit

 

N/A

 

(1,594

)

Unrecognized actuarial loss

 

N/A

 

4,247

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

(9,262

)

$

(6,261

)

Assumptions used in calculations are:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

Discount rate used to determine year end obligation

 

5.75

%

5.75

%

Discount rate used to determine fiscal year expense

 

5.75

%

5.75

%

Annual increase in cost of benefits

 

9.0

%

10.0

%

The annual increase in cost of postretirement benefits is assumed to decrease gradually in future years, reaching an ultimate rate of 5 percent in fiscal 2015.

Components of net benefit cost each fiscal year are as follows:

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Service cost

 

$

378

 

$

381

 

$

525

 

Interest cost

 

495

 

510

 

511

 

Prior service credit

 

(194

)

(194

)

(193

)

Amortization of losses

 

217

 

275

 

333

 

Net expense

 

$

896

 

$

972

 

$

1,176

 

Assumed trend rates for health-care costs have an important effect on the amounts reported for postretirement benefit plans. If the health-care cost trend rate increased by 1 percentage point, the postretirement benefit obligation as of October 31, 2007 would increase by $671. If the health-care cost trend rate decreased by 1 percentage point, the postretirement benefit obligation as of October 31, 2007 would decrease by $604.


The benefits expected to be paid by the company in each fiscal year from fiscal years 2008-2012 are $629, $835, $992, $1,082, and $1,023, respectively. The aggregate benefits expected to be paid by the company in the five fiscal years from 2013-2017 are $4,860. The expected benefits to be paid are based on the same assumptions used to measure the company’s benefit obligation as of October 31, 2007.

In addition, the company and its subsidiaries have defined benefit, supplemental, and other retirement plans covering certain employees in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. The measurement date for these plans was July 31, 2007. The projected benefit obligation of these plans as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was $31,445$38,696 and $31,127,$39,114, respectively, and the net liability amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was $3,145$4,272 and $3,144,$8,911, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation of these plans as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was $27,270$36,685 and $26,882,$36,076, respectively. The funded status of these plans as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $10,022 and $15,574, respectively. The fair value of the plan assets as of October 31, 20072010 and 20062009 was $28,584$28,674 and $24,586,$23,540, respectively. The net expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements for these plans was $954, $846,$326, $1,629, and $606$1,803 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively.

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of October 31, 2007, consisted of:

 


Defined Benefit
Pension Plans

 

Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans

 


Total

 

Net actuarial (gain) loss

 

 

$

(554

)

 

$

2,620

 

$

2,066

 

 

October 31

 Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
 Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Total 
 

2010

 

Net actuarial loss

 $1,309 $2,221 $3,530 

Net prior service cost (credit)

 

 

484

 

 

(882

)

(398

)

 248 (517) (269)
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

$

(70

)

 

$

1,738

 

$

1,668

 

 $1,557 $1,704 $3,261 
 

2009

 

Net actuarial loss

 $2,577 $1,627 $4,204 

Net prior service cost (credit)

 376 (638) (262)
 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $2,953 $989 $3,942 
 

   

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, consisted of:



 


Defined Benefit
Pension Plans

 

Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans

 


Total

 

Incremental effect of adopting SFAS No. 158

 

 

$

254

 

 

$

(1,738

)

$

(1,484

)

Net loss

 

 

295

 

 

(1,738

)

(1,443

)

Total recognized in other comprehensive income

 

 

$

(41

)

 

$

 

$

(41

)

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income

 

 

$

913

 

 

$

896

 

$

1,809

 

The following amounts are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of October 31, 20072010 and are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during fiscal 2008.2011.

 

  Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
 Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Total 



 


Defined Benefit
Pension Plans

 

Other
Postretirement 
Benefit Plans

 


Total

 

 

Net loss

 

 

$

25

 

 

$

213

 

$

238

 

 $292 $184 $476 

Net prior service cost (credit)

 

 

78

 

 

(193

)

(115

)

 67 (193) (126)
 

   Amounts recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income consisted of:

  

Fiscal years ended October 31

  Defined Benefit
Pension Plans
  Other
Postretirement
Benefit Plans
  Total 
  

2010

          

Net (gain) loss

 $(411)$669 $258 

Curtailment gain

  (578)   (578)

Amortization of unrecognized prior service (credit) cost

  (56) 121  65 

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial gain

  (351) (75) (426)
  

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss

 $(1,396)$715 $(681)
  

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss

 $(1,621)$1,266 $(355)
  

2009

          

Net loss (gain)

 $2,545 $(675)$1,870 

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost

  130  122  252 

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial loss (gain)

  632  (121) 511 
  

Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)

 $3,307 $(674)$2,633 
  

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss

 $4,020 $242 $4,262 
  

   

DuringThe company has omitted the first quarter of fiscal 2007,remaining disclosures for its defined benefit plans and postretirement healthcare plan as the company begandeems these plans to offer participantsbe immaterial to its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

12SEGMENT DATA

The company's businesses are organized, managed, and internally grouped into segments based on differences in products and services. Segment selection was based on the company’s deferred compensation plans the option to invest their deferred compensationmanner in multiple investment options. At the same time, thewhich management organizes segments for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The company elected to fund the majorityhas identified seven operating segments and has aggregated those segments into three reportable segments: Professional, Residential, and Distribution. The aggregation of the deferred compensation plans, which amounted to $17,935. The fair valuecompany's segments is based upon the segments having the following similarities: economic characteristics, types of the investment in the deferred compensation plans as of October 31, 2007 was $19,734, which reduced the company’s deferred compensation liability reflected in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.

11

SEGMENT DATA

Toro develops, manufactures, and sells a wide variety of turf maintenance equipment and services, turf and micro irrigation systems, landscaping equipment, and residential yard products used in professional and residential markets. The company’s principal businesses are based on Toro’s ability to provide comprehensive, integrated solutions that create, maintain, enhance, and conserve beautiful and functional landscapes. The company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services, types of production processes, type or class of customers, and are managed separately based on fundamental differences in their operations.method of distribution. The company's Distribution segment, which consists of company-owned domestic distributorships, has been combined with the company's corporate activities and elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses and is shown as "Other" due to the insignificance of the segment.

Reportable Segments

The professionalProfessional segment consists of turf equipment and irrigation products. Turf equipment products include sports fields and grounds maintenance equipment, golf course mowing and maintenance equipment, landscape contractor mowing equipment, landscape creation equipment, and other maintenance equipment. Irrigation products consist of sprinkler heads, electric and hydraulic valves, controllers, computer irrigation central control systems, and micro-irrigation drip tape and hose products. These products are sold mainly through a network of distributors and dealers to professional users engaged in maintaining golf courses, sports fields, municipal properties, agricultural fields, and residential and commercial landscapes, as well as directly to government customers and rental companies.

53




The residentialResidential segment consists of walk power mowers, riding mowers, snow throwers, homeowner-installed irrigation systems, replacement parts, and electrical home solutions products, including trimmers, blowers, blower-vacuums, and blower-vacuums.underground and hose-end retail irrigation products sold in Australia. These products are sold to homeowners through a network of distributors and dealers, and through a broad array of home centers, hardware retailers, home centers, and mass retailers, as well as over the Internet.

The otherOther segment consists of company-owned domestic distributor operations,the company's distribution segment and corporate activities, including corporate financing activities and elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses. Corporate activities include general corporate expenditures (finance, human resources, legal, information services, public relations, and similar activities) and other unallocated corporate assets and liabilities, such as corporate facilities, financing receivables, parts inventory, and deferred tax assets.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. The company evaluates the performance of its professionalProfessional and residentialResidential business segment results based on earnings from operations plus other income (expense), net. The otherOperating loss for the Other segment operating loss includes earnings (loss) from domestic wholly owned distribution companycompanies operations, corporate activities, other income (expense), and interest expense. The business segment’ssegment's operating profits or losses include direct costs incurred at the segment’ssegment's operating level plus allocated expenses, such as profit sharing and manufacturing expenses. The allocated expenses represent costs that these operations would have incurred otherwise but do not include general corporate expenses, interest expense, and income taxes. The company accounts for intersegment gross sales at current market prices.


The following table shows summarized financial information concerning the company’scompany's reportable segments:

 

Fiscal years ended
October 31

 

 Professional

 

Residential

 

Other

 

Total

 

 Professional Residential Other Total 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

Net sales

 

$

1,270,530

 

$

563,524

 

$

42,850

 

$

1,876,904

 

 $1,085,457 $589,677 $15,244 $1,690,378 

Intersegment gross sales

 

43,727

 

7,201

 

(50,928

)

 

 17,271 487 (17,758)  

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

254,178

 

41,828

 

(82,779

)

213,227

 

 173,752 57,956 (90,440) 141,268 

Total assets

 

500,908

 

210,082

 

239,847

 

950,837

 

 437,987 173,919 273,716 885,622 

Capital expenditures

 

26,864

 

8,515

 

6,789

 

42,168

 

 34,017 8,599 6,083 48,699 

Depreciation and amortization

 

20,980

 

11,682

 

9,443

 

42,105

 

 27,261 10,259 7,491 45,011 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

Net sales

 

$

1,224,775

 

$

566,641

 

$

44,575

 

$

1,835,991

 

 $965,935 $532,707 $24,805 $1,523,447 

Intersegment gross sales

 

48,439

 

7,835

 

(56,274

)

 

 20,208 1,079 (21,287)  

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

227,692

 

34,094

 

(69,032

)

192,754

 

 127,609 46,351 (78,172) 95,788 

Total assets

 

457,861

 

202,306

 

258,906

 

919,073

 

 418,806 171,892 281,984 872,682 

Capital expenditures

 

18,556

 

14,399

 

6,930

 

39,885

 

 25,871 7,531 4,537 37,939 

Depreciation and amortization

 

19,701

 

12,078

 

10,785

 

42,564

 

 25,197 11,040 8,298 44,535 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

Net sales

 

$

1,145,361

 

$

583,291

 

$

50,735

 

$

1,779,387

 

 $1,304,101 $542,886 $31,197 $1,878,184 

Intersegment gross sales

 

50,709

 

8,043

 

(58,752

)

 

 29,849 8,337 (38,186)  

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

207,398

 

50,160

 

(87,286

)

170,272

 

 233,359 35,304 (87,374) 181,289 

Total assets

 

452,274

 

204,428

 

258,158

 

914,860

 

 460,241 187,371 284,648 932,260 

Capital expenditures

 

24,259

 

6,067

 

7,106

 

37,432

 

 35,140 8,948 4,826 48,914 

Depreciation and amortization

 

21,272

 

11,454

 

10,103

 

42,829

 

 22,841 16,403 8,950 48,194 
 

   

The following table presents the details of the other segment operating loss before income taxes:

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Corporate expenses

 

$

(86,655

)

$

(78,247

)

$

(90,713

)

 $(74,758)$(70,802)$(77,297)

Interest expense

 

(19,445

)

(17,672

)

(17,733

)

 (17,113) (17,578) (19,333)

Finance charge revenue

 

1,791

 

2,557

 

2,991

 

  543 1,032 

Elimination of corporate financing expense

 

14,142

 

17,657

 

17,998

 

  7,052 9,960 

Other

 

7,388

 

6,673

 

171

 

Other income (expense)

 1,431 2,613 (1,736)
 

Total

 

$

(82,779

)

$

(69,032

)

$

(87,286

)

 $(90,440)$(78,172)$(87,374)
 

   

The following table presents net sales for groups of similar products and services:

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 2010 2009 2008 
 

Equipment

 $1,371,615 $1,227,023 $1,511,230 

Irrigation

 

$

381,097

 

$

373,823

 

$

365,322

 

 318,763 296,424 366,954 

Equipment

 

1,495,807

 

1,462,168

 

1,414,065

 

 

Total

 

$

1,876,904

 

$

1,835,991

 

$

1,779,387

 

 $1,690,378 $1,523,447 $1,878,184 
 

   

Sales to one customer accounted for 1213 percent of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2007, and 132010, 14 percent in fiscal 20062009, and 2005.10 percent in fiscal 2008.


Geographic Data

The following geographic area data includes net sales based on product shipment destination. Long-lived assets consist of goodwill, intangible assets, and net property, plant, and equipment, which is determined based on physical location in addition to allocated capital tooling from U.S. plant facilities.

 

Fiscal years ended October 31

 

United
States

 

Foreign
Countries

 


Total

 

 United
States
 Foreign
Countries
 Total 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

Net sales

 

$

1,333,305

 

 

$

543,599

 

$

1,876,904

 

 $1,152,790 $537,588 $1,690,378 

Long-lived assets

 

230,246

 

 

41,325

 

271,571

 

 145,409 27,998 173,407 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

Net sales

 

$

1,339,998

 

 

$

495,993

 

$

1,835,991

 

 $1,036,253 $487,194 $1,523,447 

Long-lived assets

 

213,896

 

 

39,121

 

253,017

 

 142,045 24,671 166,716 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

Net sales

 

$

1,338,743

 

 

$

440,644

 

$

1,779,387

 

 $1,269,905 $608,279 $1,878,184 

Long-lived assets

 

214,726

 

 

39,200

 

253,926

 

 140,723 28,144 168,867 
 

12

13COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Leases

Total rental expense for operating leases was $19,677, $19,448,$19,401, $20,108, and $19,698$20,428 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005,2008, respectively. As of October 31, 2007,2010, future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases amounted to $27,763$55,461 as follows: 2008, $13,706; 2009, $7,693; 2010, $3,920; 2011, $1,948;$12,956; 2012, $414;$9,812; 2013, $8,042; 2014, $5,036; 2015, $4,092 and after 2012, $82.2015, $15,523.

Customer Financing

Wholesale Financing – Financing.   During October 2009, Toro Credit Company ("TCC") sold its receivable portfolio to Red Iron, the company's joint venture with TCFIF. See Note 3 for additional information related to Red Iron. Independent Toro dealers that dodid not finance through Toro Credit Company financeTCC, as well as Exmark distributors and dealers, financed their inventories with third party financing sources. Exmark and internationalBeginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Red Iron began financing open account receivables, as well as floor plan receivables previously financed by a third party financing company. Some products sold to independent dealers are financed primarilyin Australia finance their products with third party financing sources or by the distributor. Thirdsources. Excluding Red Iron, third party financing companies purchased $164,614$11,090 of receivables from the company during fiscal 2007, of which $57,739 was outstanding as2010. As of October 31, 2007. The company’s maximum exposure for credit recourse with a2010, $12,711 of receivables financed by third party financing company related to receivables under these financing arrangementscompanies, excluding Red Iron, was $550 as of October 31, 2007.outstanding.


Toro   The company also enters into limited inventory repurchase agreements with third party financing companies which includesand Red Iron for receivables soldfinanced by the company to third party financing companies as well as receivables sold by the company’s distributors to the third party financing companies.and Red Iron. As of October 31, 2007,2010, the company was contingently liable to repurchase up to $5,788a maximum amount of $12,109 of inventory related to receivables under these financing arrangements. ToroThe company has repurchased only immaterial amounts of inventory from third party financing companies over the last three years.under these repurchase agreements.

End-User Financing – Financing.The company has agreements with a third party financing companycompanies to provide lease-financing options to golf course and sports fields and grounds equipment customers in North America, Europe,the U.S. and Australia.Europe. During fiscal 2007, the company entered into an amended agreement with a third party financing company that eliminated the company’scompany's contingent liability for any residual value risk on the underlying equipment financed under this program. In addition, under the terms of the amended agreement, the company is only contingently liable for a portion of the credit collection risk for leases entered into prior to the effective date of the amended agreement. From time to time, the company enters into agreements where it provides recourse to the third party finance company in the event of default by the customer for lease payments to the third party finance company. The company’scompany's maximum exposure for credit collection as of October 31, 20072010 was $7,172. The company has established a reserve for the estimated exposure related to the credit collection risk, which was $907 and $2,310 as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.$7,886.

The company entered into an agreement to sell certain accounts receivable and notes to a third party. The total amount of receivables and notes outstanding under this agreement may not exceed $10,000 at any time. During fiscal 2007, the company sold $1,051 of receivables and notes under the terms of this agreement.

In the normal course of business, the company has arrangements with other financial institutions to provide various forms of financing options to end-user customers. From time to time, Toro’s wholly owned subsidiaries also guarantee the residual value at the end of leases with third party financing companies for product sold to customers. The amount of this potential contingent liability as of October 31, 2007 and 2006 was $4,393 and $3,962, respectively.

Purchase Commitments

As of October 31, 2007,2010, the company had $2,877$3,933 of noncancelable purchase commitments with some suppliers for materials and supplies as part of the normal course of business.

Letters of Credit

Letters of credit are issued by the company during the normal course of business, as required by some vendor contracts. As of October 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, the company had $11,689$13,269 and $11,655,$12,792, respectively, in outstanding letters of credit.

Customs Duties

The company is liable for customs duties for certain products that are imported and exported between countries. The company has determined that it has a potential liability for unpaid customs duties on certain products. The company accrued an estimate of this liability and is currently working to resolve the matter with the appropriate governmental officials. Although the ultimate resolution of this matter could potentially be different than the original estimate, the matter is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated operating results or financial position of the company.


Litigation

InGeneral.   The company is party to litigation in the ordinary course of business,business. Litigation occasionally involves claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages arising out of use of the company's products. Although the company may become liableis self-insured to some extent, the company maintains insurance against certain product liability losses. The company is also subject to administrative proceedings with respect to pendingclaims involving the discharge of hazardous substances into the environment. Some of these claims assert damages and threatened litigation, tax, environmental, and other matters. While the ultimate results of current claims,liability for remedial investigations and lawsuits involvingclean up costs. The company is also typically involved in commercial disputes, employment disputes, and patent litigation cases in the company are unknown at this time, management does not expect that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operating results or financial positionordinary course of the company.

business. To prevent possible infringement of itsthe company's patents by others, the company periodically reviews competitors’competitors' products. To avoid potential liability with respect to others’others' patents, the company regularly reviews certain patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)("USPTO") and foreign patent offices. This patent program, consistingManagement believes these activities help minimize its risk of both types of activities, helps the company minimize risk ofbeing a defendant in patent infringement litigation. The company is currently involved in commercial disputes and patent litigation cases both where it is asserting patentspatent infringement.

Lawnmower Engine Horsepower Marketing and where it is defending against charges of infringement. While the ultimate results of the current cases are unknown at this time, management believes that the outcome of these cases is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operation or financial condition of the company.

OnSales Practices Litigation.   In June 3, 2004, eight individuals who claim to have purchased lawnmowers in Illinois and Minnesota filed a class action lawsuit in Illinois state court against the company and eight other defendants alleging that the horsepower labels on the products the plaintiffs purchased were inaccurate. On May 17, 2006, the plaintiffs filed anThose individuals later amended their complaint to add 84 additional plaintiffs and an engine manufacturer as an additional defendant. The amended complaint assertsplaintiffs asserted violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) Act and state statutory and common law claims arising from the laws of 48 states.claims. The plaintiffs seeksought certification of a class of all persons in the United States who, beginning January 1, 1994 through the present, purchased a lawnmower containing a two-stroke or four-stroke gas combustible engine up to 30 horsepower that was manufactured or sold by the defendants. The amended complaint seeksalso sought an injunction, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, treble damages under the RICO, Act, and attorneys’attorneys' fees. In late May 2006, the case was removed to Federalfederal court in the Southern District of Illinois. On August 1, 2006,

   In May 2008, the Court issued a memorandum and order that, among other things, (i) dismissed the RICO claim in its entirety; and (ii) dismissed all ofnon-Illinois state-law claims but with instructions that such claims could be re-filed in local courts. The plaintiffs subsequently (i) re-filed the defendants, except MTD Products Inc.,Illinois claims with the court; and (ii) filed motions to dismiss thenon-Illinois claims in federal courts throughout the amended complaint. On August 4, 2006,U.S. with essentially the same state law claims.

   In September 2008, the company and other defendants filed a motion with the MDL Panel that sought to transfer the multiple actions for coordinated pretrial proceedings. In December 2008, the MDL Panel issued an order that (i) transferred the lawsuits for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings; (ii) selected the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin as the transferee district; and (iii) provided that additional lawsuits would be treated as "tag-along" actions in accordance with its rules.


   In January 2009, at the initial hearing held in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the Court (i) appointed lead plaintiffs' counsel, and (ii) entered a stay of all litigation so that the parties could explore mediation. The company and certain other defendants entered into a settlement agreement with plaintiffs in February 2010 and, ultimately, all defendants entered into various settlement agreements with the plaintiffs. The company's settlement agreement provides for, among other things, (i) a monetary settlement, (ii) an additional warranty period for some engines that are subject to the litigation, and (iii) injunctive relief relating to power rating labeling practices. The plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of athe company's settlement agreement and for certification of the settlement class. The court granted the motion.

   Notice was given to the settlement class and, in June 2010, the Court conducted a hearing to consider objections from certain members of the settlement class and to determine whether the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. In August 2010, the Court filed an order and judgment in which it determined that the company's settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and approved the settlement. The Court filed similar orders and judgments approving the settlements entered into by other defendants. Also in August 2010, certain objectors filed notices with MTD Products Inc.the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (the "Appellate Court") to appeal the order and judgment approving the company's settlement and the other orders and judgments approving the settlements with the other defendants. At this time, management is unable to provide assurance that the Appellate Court will uphold the Court's approval of the company's settlement or that the settlement will become final for all purposes. In the event the appeal is not withdrawn, the company's settlement will not become final for all purposes until the settlement order is affirmed on appeal and the affirmance is no longer subject to the possibility of further appeal or review.

   In March 2010, individuals who claim to have purchased lawnmowers in Canada filed class action litigation against the company and other defendants that (i) contains allegations under applicable Canadian law that are similar to the allegations made by the United States plaintiffs, (ii) seeks certification of a settlement class. All remaining non-settlingclass of all persons in Canada who, beginning January 1, 1994 purchased a lawnmower containing a gas combustible engine up to 30 horsepower that was manufactured or sold by the defendants, have filed counterclaims against MTD Products Inc. for potential contribution amounts, and MTD Products Inc. has filed cross claims against the non-settling defendants. On December 21, 2006, another defendant, American Honda Motor Company, notified the company that it had reached an agreement of settlement with the plaintiffs. On March 30, 2007, the court entered an order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, subject to the ability to re-plead certain claims pursuant to a detailed written order to follow. As of the date hereof, the court has not yet entered the detailed written order.(iii) seeks under applicable Canadian law unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys' costs and fees, and equitable relief.

   Management continues to evaluate this lawsuit andlitigation. If the settlement with the United States plaintiffs becomes final, the company's obligations under the settlement agreement will not have a material adverse effect on the company's operating results or financial position. The expected costs of the company's settlement obligations are consistent with accruals established in prior periods. In the event the settlement with the United States plaintiffs does not become final for all purposes or in the event that the company is unable to reasonably estimatefavorably resolve the likelihood of loss or the amount or range of potential loss that could result from this litigation. Therefore, no accrual has been established for potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. ManagementCanadian litigation, management is also unable to assess at this time whether the lawsuit willthis litigation would have a material adverse effect on the company’scompany's annual consolidated operating results or financial condition, although an unfavorable resolution or outcome could be material to the company’s consolidated operating results for a particular period.

In July 2005, Textron Innovations Inc., the patent holding company of Textron, Inc., filed a lawsuit in Delaware Federal District Court against the company for patent infringement. Textron alleges that Toro willfully infringes certain claims of three Textron patents by selling its Groundsmaster® commercial mowers. Textron seeks damages for the company’s past sales and an injunction against future infringement. In August and November 2005, management answered the complaint, asserting defenses and counterclaims of non-infringement, invalidity, and equitable estoppel. Following the Court’s order in October 2006 construing the claims of Textron’s patents, discovery in the case was closed in February 2007. In March 2007, following unsuccessful attempts to mediate the case, management filed with the USPTO to have Textron’s patents reexamined. The reexamination proceedings are pending in the USPTO. In April 2007, the Court granted the company’s motion to stay the litigation and, in June 2007, denied Textron’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order staying the proceedings. Management continues to evaluate this lawsuit and is unable to reasonably estimate the likelihood of loss or the amount or range of potential loss that could result from the litigation. Therefore, no accrual has been established for potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. While management does not believe that the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial condition, an unfavorable resolution could be material to the company’scompany's consolidated operating results for a particular period.

13

14FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of accounts receivable that are concentrated in two business segments: professionalProfessional and residentialResidential markets for outdoor landscape equipment and irrigation systems. The credit risk associated with these segments is limited because of the large number of customers in the company’scompany's customer base and their geographic dispersion, except for the residential segment that has significant sales to The Home Depot.


Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The company uses derivative instruments to manage exposureis exposed to foreign currency exchange rates. Tororate risk arising from transactions in the normal course of business, such as sales to third party customers, sales and loans to wholly owned foreign subsidiaries, foreign plant operations, and purchases from suppliers. The company actively manages the exposure of its foreign currency exchange rate market risk by entering into various hedging instruments, authorized under company policies that place controls on these activities, with counterparties that are highly rated financial institutions. The company's hedging activities involve the primary use of forward currency contracts. The company uses derivative instruments only in an attempt to limit underlying exposure from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and to minimize earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency exchange rate changes. Decisions on whether to use such contracts are made based on the amount of exposure to the currency involved, and an assessment of the near-term market value for each currency. The company's policy is not to allow the use of derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The company's primary foreign currency exchange rate exposures are with the Euro, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the British pound, the Mexican peso, and the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar.

Cash flow hedges.   The company recognizes all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet and formally documents all relationships between cash flow hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its



risk-management objectivesobjective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives to the forecasted transactions, such as sales to third parties and foreign plant operations. Derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, all changes in fair values of outstanding cash flow hedge derivatives, except the ineffective portion, are recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI), until net earnings is affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in net earnings. The consolidated statement of earnings classification of effective hedge results is the same as that of the underlying exposure. Results of hedges of sales and foreign plant operations are recorded in net sales and cost of sales, respectively, when the underlying hedged transaction affects net earnings. The maximum amount of time the company hedges its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted trade sales and purchases is two years.

The company formally assesses both at the hedge’sa hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instrumentsderivatives that are used in the hedging transactions aretransaction have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item.

The company enters into foreign currency exchange contractsitems and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not, or has ceased to be, highly effective as a hedge, the risk fromcompany discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. When the company discontinues hedge accounting because it is no longer probable, but it is still reasonably possible that the forecasted settlementtransaction will occur by the end of the originally expected period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in local currenciesaccumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) and is reclassified to net earnings when the forecasted transaction affects net earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of trade salesthe originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gains and purchases. Theselosses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are recognized immediately in net earnings. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the company carries the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, recognizing future changes in the fair value in other income (expense), net. For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no gains or losses on contracts arereclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges. As of October 31, 2010, the notional amount outstanding of forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges withwas $101,866.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.   The company also enters into forward currency contracts to mitigate the change in fair value of specific assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of hedges of recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and as a hedge asset or liability in prepaid expenses or accrued liabilities, as applicable. Once the forecasted transaction has been recognized as a sale or inventory purchase and a related asset or liability recorded in the balance sheet positions, such as cash, receivables, payables, intercompany notes, and other various contractual claims to pay or receive foreign currencies other than the related fair valuefunctional currency, are recognized immediately in other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of earnings together with the derivative hedge contract is reclassifiedtransaction gain or loss from accumulated other comprehensive loss to sales or cost of sales. During fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, the amount of losses treated as a reduction of net sales for contracts to hedge sales were $2,240, $446, and $3,016, respectively. During fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, thedged balance sheet position.he amount of gains treated as a reduction to cost of sales for contracts to hedge inventory purchases were $1,002, $61, and $1,280, respectively.

   The unrecognized after-tax (loss) gain portion offollowing table presents the fair value of the contracts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losscompany's derivatives and consolidated balance sheet location.

  

 Asset Derivatives  Liability Derivatives  

 October 31, 2010  October 31, 2009  October 31, 2010  October 31, 2009  

 Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 Balance
Sheet
Location
  Fair
Value
 
  

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

                     

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses

 
$

 

Prepaid expenses

 
$

 

Accrued liabilities

 
$

3,886
 

Accrued liabilities

 
$

4,311
 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

                     

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Prepaid expenses

  
 

Prepaid expenses

  
 

Accrued liabilities

  
2,626
 

Accrued liabilities

  
2,468
 
                  

Total Derivatives

   
$

   
$

   
$

6,512
   
$

6,779
 
  

   The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the company's derivatives designed as cash flow hedging instruments for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

  

  Gain (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives
(Effective Portion)
 

Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)

  Gain (Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into Income
(Effective Portion)
 

Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in
Income on Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion and excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)

  Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Income on Derivatives
(Ineffective Portion and
Excluded from
Effectiveness Testing)
 
            

For the fiscal year ended

  October 31,
2010
  October 31,
2009
    October 31,
2010
  October 31,
2009
    October 31,
2010
  October 31,
2009
 
  

Foreign exchange contracts

 $(6,177)$7,371 

Net sales

 $(1,294)$11,777 

Other income (expense), net

 $(55)$183 
                  

Foreign exchange contracts

  976  (4,444)

Cost of sales

  272  (4,205)        
            

Total

 $(5,201)$2,927   $(1,022)$7,572         
          

   As of October 31, 2007 and 2006 was $(3,763) and $420, respectively.2010, the company anticipates to reclassify approximately $3,737 of losses from AOCL to earnings during the next twelve months.

   The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments on the consolidated statements of earnings for the company's derivatives not designated as hedging instruments.

  

 Location of Gain (Loss)  Gain (Loss) Recognized
in Net Earnings
Fiscal Year Ended
 
      

 Recognized in
Net Earnings
  October 31,
2010
  October 31,
2009
 
  

Foreign exchange contracts

 Other income (expense), net $1,619 $(10,282)
  

During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the company entered into three treasury lock agreements based on a 30-year U.S. Treasury security with a principal balance of $30 million$30,000 for two of the agreements and $40 million$40,000 for the third agreement. These treasury lock agreements provided for a single payment at maturity, which was April 23, 2007, based on the change in value of the reference treasury security. These agreements were designated as cash flow hedges and resulted in a net settlement of $182, which was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, and will be amortized to interest expense over the 30-year term of the senior notes. The unrecognized loss portion of the fair value of these agreements in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of October 31, 20072010 and 2009 was $179.$161 and $167, respectively.

Fair Value

The company also enterscategorizes its assets and liabilities into other foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge intracompany financing transactions and other activities, which do not meetone of three levels based on the hedge accounting criteria of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;” therefore, changesassumptions (inputs) used in fair value of these instruments are recorded in other income, net.

Fair Value

Estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Because considerable judgment is required in developingvaluing the estimatesasset or liability. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, these estimateswhile Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

   Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

   Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not necessarily indicativeactive; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the amounts that could be realizedassets or liabilities.

   Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting management's assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

   Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a current market exchange. For cashrecurring basis, as of October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are summarized below:

  

October 31, 2010

  Fair
Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
  

Assets:

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $177,366 $177,366     
  
   

Total assets

 $177,366 $177,366     
  

Liabilities:

             
 

Foreign exchange contracts

 $6,512   $6,512   
 

Deferred compensation liabilities

  4,994    4,994   
  
   

Total liabilities

 $11,506   $11,506   
  


  

October 31, 2009

  Fair
Value
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
  

Assets:

             
 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $187,773 $187,773     
  
   

Total assets

 $187,773 $187,773     
  

Liabilities:

             
 

Foreign exchange contracts

 $6,779   $6,779   
 

Deferred compensation liabilities

  5,814    5,814   
  
   

Total liabilities

 $12,593   $12,593   
  

   Cash and cash equivalents receivables, short-term debt, are valued at their carrying amounts in the consolidated balance sheets, which are reasonable estimates of their fair value due to their short maturities. Foreign currency forward exchange contracts are valued at fair market value using the market approach based on exchange rates as of the reporting date, which is the amount the company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts. The unfunded deferred compensation liability is primarily subject to changes in fixed-income investment contracts based on current yields. For accounts receivable


and accounts payable, carrying valueamounts is a reasonable estimate of fair value. The estimate of fair value for the company’s foreign currency contracts was a net liability of $7,178 and $361 as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.given their short-term nature.

As of October 31, 2007,2010, the estimated fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates was $241,607$227,388 compared to its carrying valueamount of $229,209.$227,190. As of October 31, 2006,2009, the estimated fair value of long-term debt with fixed interest rates was $184,910$232,891 compared to its carrying valueamount of $175,000.$230,515. The fair value is estimated by discounting the projected cash flows using the rate at which similar amounts of debt could currently be borrowed.

14

15SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The company evaluated all subsequent events and concluded that no additional subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.

16QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)

Summarized quarterly financial data for fiscal 20072010 and 20062009 are as follows:

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2007
Quarter

 


First

 


Second

 


Third

 


Fourth

 

Net sales

 

$

379,088

 

$

686,653

 

$

478,707

 

$

332,456

 

Gross profit

 

140,065

 

244,716

 

177,443

 

116,151

 

Net earnings

 

18,450

 

74,966

 

42,486

 

6,534

 

Basic net earnings per share1

 

0.45

 

1.82

 

1.05

 

0.16

 

Diluted net earnings per share1

 

0.44

 

1.77

 

1.02

 

0.16

 

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2006
Quarter

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2010
Quarter

 First Second Third Fourth 
 

Net sales

 

$

369,640

 

$

659,004

 

$

477,861

 

$

329,486

 

 $331,358 $562,819 $458,890 $337,311 

Gross profit

 

131,874

 

230,256

 

170,336

 

110,850

 

 116,391 187,412 161,633 110,955 

Net earnings

 

14,279

 

70,082

 

40,322

 

4,462

 

 10,918 45,661 33,414 3,244 

Basic net earnings per share1

 

0.33

 

1.62

 

0.94

 

0.11

 

 0.32 1.35 1.03 0.10 

Diluted net earnings per share1

 

0.32

 

1.56

 

0.91

 

0.10

 

 0.32 1.34 1.01 0.10 
 


  

Fiscal year ended
October 31, 2009
Quarter

  First  Second  Third  Fourth 
  

Net sales

 $340,172 $499,852 $394,859 $288,564 

Gross profit

  118,260  161,225  133,798  97,692 

Net earnings

  6,731  36,861  19,777  (532)

Basic net earnings (loss) per share1

  0.19  1.01  0.55  (0.02)

Diluted net earnings (loss) per share1

  0.18  1.00  0.54  (0.02)
  
1
Net earnings per share amounts do not sum to equal full year total due to changes in the number of shares outstanding during the periods and rounding.


ITEM 9.   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)) that are designed to reasonably ensureprovide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company’scompany's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognizethe company recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and we aremanagement is required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible internal controls. The company’scompany's management evaluated, with the participation of the company’scompany's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’scompany's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered inby this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, the company’scompany's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’scompany's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’sSEC's rules and forms, and that materialsuch information relating to Torothe company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made knownaccumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. The company’scompany's management report on internal control over financial reporting is included in this report in Part II, Item 8, “Financial"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”Data" under the caption “Management’s"Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting." The report of KPMG LLP, the company’scompany's independent registered public accounting firm, regarding the effectiveness of the company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is included in this report in Part II, Item 8, “Financial"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”Data" under the caption “Report"Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm." There was no change in the company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’scompany's fourth fiscal quarter ended October 31, 20072010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.


PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information on executive officers required by this item is incorporated by reference from “Executive"Executive Officers of the Registrant”Registrant" in Part I of this report. Additional information on certain executive officers and other information required by this item is incorporated by reference to information to be contained under the captions “Stock Ownership – Section"Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, “ProposalCompliance," "Proposal One – Election of Directors – Information About Board Nominees and Continuing Directors”, “CorporateDirectors," "Corporate Governance – Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for theour CEO and Senior Financial Officers”,Officers," and “Corporate"Corporate Governance – Board Committees – Audit Committee,”," in the company’s 2008company's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007,2010, the company made nodid not make any material changes to the procedures by which stockholdersshareholders may recommend nominees to the board of directors, as described in the company’s most recentcompany's proxy statement.statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The company has a Code of Ethics for its CEO and Senior Financial Officers, a copy of which is posted on the company's web site atwww.thetorocompany.com (select the "Investor Information" link and then the "Corporate Governance" link). The company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirements regarding its code of ethics, includingItem 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding amendments to or waivers from theany provision of its code of ethics by posting such information on ourits web site atwww.thetorocompany.com – select(select the “Investor Information”"Investor Information" link and then the “Corporate Governance” link."Corporate Governance" link).

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to information to be contained under the captions “Executive Officer Compensation”"Executive Compensation" and “Corporate"Corporate Governance – Director Compensation”Compensation" in the company’s 2008company's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

58





ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to information to be contained under the captions “Stock Ownership”"Stock Ownership" and “Equity"Equity Compensation Plan Information”Information" in the company’s 2008company's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to information to be contained under the caption “Corporate"Corporate Governance – Director Independence”Independence" and “Corporate"Corporate Governance – Policies and Procedures Regarding Related Person Transactions”Transactions" in the company’s 2008company's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to information to be contained under the captions “Proposal Three"Proposal Two – Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and Other Fees”Fees" and “Proposal Three"Proposal Two – Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures”Procedures" in the company’s 2008company's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


SEC.


PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) 1.  List of Financial Statements

The following consolidated financial statements of The Toro Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial"Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”Data" of this report:

·       Management’s

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

·

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

·

Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005.

·2008.

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 20072010 and 2006.

·2009.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005.

·2008.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 2005.

·2008.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(a) 2.  List of Financial Statement Schedules

The following financial statement schedule of The Toro Company and its subsidiaries is included herein:

·

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules are omitted because the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(a)(a) 3.  List of Exhibits

The following exhibits are incorporated herein by reference or are filed or furnished with this report as indicated below:

Exhibit Number


Description


2.1 (1)   Agreement to Form Joint Venture dated August 12, 2009 by and between The Toro Company and TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).**

2.2 (1)    Limited Liability Company Agreement of Red Iron Acceptance, LLC dated August 12, 2009 by and between Red Iron Holding Corporation and TCFIF Joint Venture I, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).**

2.3    Receivable Purchase Agreement, by and among Toro Credit Company, as Seller, The Toro Company, and Red Iron Acceptance, LLC, as Buyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).**

2.4    Second Amended and Restated Repurchase Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2010, by and between The Toro Company and Red Iron Acceptance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 29, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).**

3(i)


3.1 and 4.1    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 17, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).

3.2 and 4.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 17, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4.3    Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4.4    Indenture dated as of January 31, 1997, between Registrant and First National Trust Association, as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company's 7.80% Debentures due June 15, 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 24, 1997, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4.5    Indenture dated as of April 20, 2007, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company's 6.625% Notes due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2007, Registration No. 333-142282).

4.6    First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007, between Registrant and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company's 6.625% Notes due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4.7    Form of The Toro Company 6.625% Note due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.1    Form of Employment Agreement in effect for certain executive officers of The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.2    The Toro Company First Amendment to Employment Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 30, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.3    The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 16, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.4    The Toro Company 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.5    The Toro Company Performance Share Plan (As Amended January 15, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 15, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.6    The Toro Company 2000 Stock Option Plan (As Amended December 3, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.7    The Toro Company Supplemental Benefit Plan, Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.8    The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan, Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.9    The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers, Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.10    The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 1, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.11    The Toro Company 2000 Directors Stock Plan (As Amended March 18, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 1, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.12   Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Non-Employee Directors under The Toro Company 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.13    Form of Nonemployee Director Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Non-Employee Directors under The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.14    Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Officers and other employees under The Toro Company 2000 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.15    Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Officers and other employees under The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.16    Form of Performance Share Award Agreement between The Toro Company and its Officers and other employees under The Toro Company Performance Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.17    Form of Performance Share Award Agreement between The Toro Company and its officers and certain other employees under The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (filed herewith).*

10.18    Form of Annual Performance Award Agreement between The Toro Company and its officers and certain other employees under The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (filed herewith).*

10.19    Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement between The Toro Company and its Officers and other employees under The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.20    Indemnification Agreement with the members of the Board of Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.21    Restricted Stock Agreement – Judy Altmaier (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.22    Post-Retirement Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of December 31, 2005 between The Toro Company and Kendrick B. Melrose (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10.23    Credit Agreement dated as of September 8, 2004, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and Certain Subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer and Banc of America Securities LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 2004, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.24    Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of October 25, 2005, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, and Certain Subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.25    Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of January 10, 2007, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.26    Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement executed and delivered as of April 10, 2007 but effective as of February 28, 2007, by and among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 10, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.27    Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2008, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and certain subsidiaries as Borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 29, 2008, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.28    Amendment No. 5 to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2010, by and among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, Toro International Company, Tover Overseas B.V., and Toro Factoring Company Limited, each as a Borrower, each lender from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 9, 2010, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.29    Underwriting Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2007, between The Toro Company and Banc of America Securities LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.30 (1)    Credit and Security Agreement dated August 12, 2009 by and between Red Iron Acceptance, LLC and TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2009, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10.31    Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by and among Editland Limited, Toro Hayter (Guernsey) Limited, Hayter Limited, and The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

12    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

21    Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith).

23    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).

31.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).

31.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).

32    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

101    The following financial information from The Toro Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on December 22, 2010, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Statements of Earnings for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2010, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended October 31, 2010, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.***
(1)
Portions of this exhibit have been redacted and 4(a)The Toro Company Amended and Restated Certificateare subject to an order granting confidential treatment under the Securities Exchange Act of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(a) and 4(a) to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

3(ii) and 4(b)   Bylaws of The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4(c)Specimen Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006).

4(d)   Rights Agreement dated as of May 20, 1998, between The Toro Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. relating to rights to purchase Series B Junior Participating Voting Preferred Stock,1934, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 1998, Commission File(File No. 1-8649)001-08649, CF # 24035).

4(e)Certificate of Adjusted Purchase Price or Number of Shares dated April 14, 2003 The redacted material was filed by The Toro Company with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent, in connection with Rights Agreement dated as of May 20, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A dated April 14, 2003, Commission File No. 1-8649).


4(f)Certificate of Adjusted Purchase Price or Number of Shares dated April 12, 2005 filed by The Toro Company with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Rights Agent, in connection with Rights Agreement dated as of May 20, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A dated March 21, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4(g)Indenture dated as of January 31, 1997, between The Toro Company and First National Trust Association, as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company’s June 15, 2007 and its 7.80% Debentures due June 15, 2027 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K for June 24, 1997, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4(h)Indenture dated as of April 20, 2007, between The Toro Company, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company’s 6.625% Notes due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 as filedseparately with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2007, Registration No. 333-142282).

4(i)First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007, between The Toro Company, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to The Toro Company’s 6.625% Notes due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

4(j)Form of The Toro Company 6.625% Note due May 1, 2037 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10(a)Form of Employment Agreement in effect for executive officers of The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999).Commission.

*

10(b)The Toro Company Annual Management Incentive Plan II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2005).*

10(c)The Toro Company 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999).*

10(d)The Toro Company Performance Share Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(e)The Toro Company 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2006).*

10(f)The Toro Company Supplemental Benefit Plan (formerly The Toro Company Supplement Management Retirement Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999).*

10(g)Amendment to The Toro Company Supplemental Benefit Plan (formerly The Toro Company Supplement Management Retirement Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2004).*

10(h)Amendment No. 2 to The Toro Company Supplemental Benefit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(i)The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan (formerly The Toro Company Supplemental Retirement Plan) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 1999).*

10(j)Amendment No. 1 to The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(h) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(k)Post-Retirement Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement dated as of December 31, 2005 between The Toro Company and Kendrick B. Melrose (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10(l)The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002).*

10(m)Amendment No. 1 to The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(n)   The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(l) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 28, 2000).*

10(o)Amendment No. 1 to The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(p)The Toro Company 2000 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 20, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).*


10(q)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 20, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10(r)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between The Toro Company and its Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2004, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10(s)Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).*

10(t)Form of Performance Share Award Agreement.*

10(u)Indemnification Agreement with the members of the Board of Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006).*

10(v)Summary of Employment Inducement Award – Timothy P. Dordell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(w)Summary of Employment Inducement Award – Peter M. Ramstad (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 2, 2007).*

10(x)Credit Agreement dated as of September 8, 2004, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and Certain Subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer and Banc of America Securities LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 2004, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10(y)Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement dated as of October 25, 2005, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, and Certain Subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005).

10(z)Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement dated as of January 10, 2007, among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10(aa)   Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement executed and delivered as of April 10, 2007 but effective as of February 28, 2007, by and among The Toro Company, Toro Credit Company, Toro Manufacturing LLC, Exmark Manufacturing Company Incorporated, and certain subsidiaries, as Borrowers, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swingline Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 10, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10(bb)   Underwriting Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2007, between The Toro Company and Banc of America Securities LLC, as representative of the several underwriters named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 23, 2007, Commission File No. 1-8649).

10(cc)   Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 8, 2005, by and among Editland Limited, Toro Hayter (Guernsey) Limited, Hayter Limited, and The Toro Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 8, 2005, Commission File No. 1-8649).

12   Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

21   Subsidiaries of Registrant

23   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

31(a)Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).

31(b)Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).

32   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 15(b).

of Regulation S-K.

**
All exhibits and schedules to this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Toro will furnish the omitted exhibits and schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

***
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of those sections, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings.

(b(b)  Exhibits)   Exhibits

See Item 15(a)(3) above.

(c)(c)  Financial Statement Schedules

See Item 15(a)(2) above.



61




SCHEDULE II

THE TORO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Balance as of
the beginning
of the fiscal year

 

Charged to
costs and
expenses
1

 


Other
2

 


Deductions
3

 

Balance as of
the end of
the fiscal year

 

 Balance as of
the beginning
of the fiscal year
 Charged to
costs and
expenses1
 Other2 Deductions3 Balance as of
the end of
the fiscal year
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves

 

 

$

2,839

 

 

$

1,237

 

 

$

186

 

 

$

115

 

 

$

4,147

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves

 

 

2,349

 

 

723

 

 

 

 

233

 

 

2,839

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2010

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves

 

 

2,195

 

 

570

 

 

147

 

 

563

 

 

2,349

 

 $4,151 $666 $70 $983 $3,904 
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2009

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves

 2,726 1,811  386 4,151 
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2008

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable reserves

 4,147 (291)  1,130 2,726 
 

1     Provision.

Provision/(recovery).
2
Addition, net due to acquisitions and divestitures.

3
Uncollectible accounts charged off.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Balance as of
the beginning
of the fiscal year

 

Charged to
costs and
expenses
1

 

Deductions2

 

Other3

 

Balance as of
the end of
the fiscal year

 

 Balance as of
the beginning
of the fiscal year
 Charged to
costs and
expenses1
 Deductions2 Balance as of
the end of
the fiscal year
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued advertising and marketing programs

 

 

$

50,124

 

 

$

203,806

 

 

$

200,165

 

 

$

 

 

$

53,765

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued advertising and marketing programs

 

 

48,367

 

 

189,607

 

 

187,850

 

 

 

 

50,124

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2010

 

Accrued advertising and marketing programs

 

 

41,973

 

 

174,106

 

 

168,301

 

 

589

 

 

48,367

 

 $45,298 $191,799 $194,002 $43,095 
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2009

 

Accrued advertising and marketing programs

 48,412 187,724 190,838 45,298 
 

Fiscal year ended October 31, 2008

 

Accrued advertising and marketing programs

 53,765 202,435 207,788 48,412 
 

1
Provision consists of rebates, cooperative advertising, floor planning costs, commissions, and other promotional program expenses. The expense of each program is either classified as a reduction of net sales or as a component of selling, general, and administrative expense.
2
Claims paid.

2
     Claims paid.

3     Addition due to acquisition.

62




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

THE TORO COMPANY



(Registrant)


By:

(Registrant)


By


/s/   Stephen P. Wolfe

Dated: December 21, 2007



Stephen P. Wolfe



Dated: December 22, 2010

Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Signature
Title


Date


/s/ Michael J. Hoffman



Michael J. Hoffman

Chairman of the Board, President and

December 21, 2007

Michael J. Hoffman


Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)

December 22, 2010


/s/ Stephen P. Wolfe



Stephen P. Wolfe



Vice President, Finance and

December 21, 2007

Stephen P. Wolfe


Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)



December 22, 2010


/s/ Blake M. Grams

Managing Director, Corporate Controller

December 21, 2007



Blake M. Grams



Vice President, Corporate Controller
(principal accounting officer)



December 22, 2010

/s/   Ronald O. Baukol

Director

December 21, 2007

Ronald O. Baukol


/s/ Robert C. Buhrmaster

Director

December 21, 2007



Robert C. Buhrmaster



Director



December 22, 2010

/s/   Winslow H. Buxton

Director

December 21, 2007

Winslow H. Buxton


/s/ Janet K. Cooper

Director

December 21, 2007



Janet K. Cooper



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Gary L. Ellis

Director

December 21, 2007



Gary L. Ellis



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Jeffrey M. Ettinger


Jeffrey M. Ettinger


Director


December 22, 2010

/s/ Katherine J. Harless

Director

December 21, 2007



Katherine J. Harless



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Robert H. Nassau

Director

December 21, 2007



Robert H. Nassau



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Gregg W. Steinhafel

Director

December 21, 2007



Gregg W. Steinhafel



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Inge G. Thulin

Director

December 21, 2007



Inge G. Thulin



Director



December 22, 2010


/s/ Christopher A. Twomey

Director

December 21, 2007



Christopher A. Twomey



Director



December 22, 2010

63





QuickLinks

THE TORO COMPANY FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PART II
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
PART III
PART IV
SCHEDULE II
SIGNATURES