Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

 

x      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

OR

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended

December 31, 2007

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to                    

 

Commission file number 001-32324

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Maryland

 

20-1024732

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

 

(IRS Employer

Incorporation or Organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

50 Public Square460 East Swedesford Road

 

 

Suite 28003000

 

 

Cleveland, OhioWayne, Pennsylvania

 

4411319087

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (216) 274-1340(610) 293-5700

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares, $0.01 par value per share

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES xNOo¨

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES oNOx

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES xNOo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large Accelerated Filer x           Accelerated Filer o          Non-Accelerated Filer o             Smaller Reporting Company o

Accelerated Filer x

Non-Accelerated Filer o

Smaller Reporting Company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES oNOx

 

As of June 30, 2007,2010, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $942,351,737.$693,467,344.

 

As of February 27, 2008,25, 2011 the number of common shares of the registrant outstanding was 57,847,325.99,427,944.

 

Documents incorporated by reference:  Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20082011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Registrant to be filed subsequently with the SEC are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 



Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I

 

3

 

 

 

Item 1.

Business

34

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

10

 

 

 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

21

 

 

 

Item 2.

Properties

2122

 

 

 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

30

 

 

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersRemoved and Reserved

30

 

 

 

PART II

 

3031

 

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

31

 

 

 

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

33

 

 

 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

36

 

 

 

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4948

 

 

 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

5048

 

 

 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

5048

 

 

 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

5049

 

 

 

Item 9B.

Other Information

5049

 

 

 

PART III

 

50

 

 

 

Item 10.

Trustees, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

5150

 

 

 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

5150

 

 

 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

5150

 

 

 

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Trustee Independence

5150

 

 

 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

51

 

 

 

PART IV

 

5251

 

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

5251

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K together withand other statements and information publicly disseminated by U-Store-ItU- Store-It Trust (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to:

 

·         national and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions;

 

·         the competitive environment in which we operate;operate, including our ability to raise rental rates;

 

·         the execution of our business plan;

 

·         the availability of external sources of capital;

·financing risks, including the risk of over-leverage and the corresponding risk of default on our mortgage and other debt;debt and potential inability to refinance existing indebtedness;

 

·         increases in interest rates and operating costs;

 

·         counterparty non-performance related to the use of derivative financial instruments;

·our ability to maintain our status as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes;

 

·         acquisition and development risks;

 

·         increases in taxes, fees, and assessments from state and local jurisdictions;

·changes in real estate and zoning laws or regulations;

 

·         risks related to natural disasters;

 

·         potential environmental and other liabilities;

 

·         other factors affecting the real estate industry generally or the self-storage industry in particular; and

 

·         other risks identified in Item 1A of thisour Annual Report on Form 10-K and, from time to time, in other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or in other documents that we publicly disseminate.

 

We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as may be required in securities laws.

 

3



Table of Contents

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

Overview

 

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate company focused primarily on the ownership, operation, acquisition and development of self-storage facilities in the United States.

 

As of December 31, 2007,2010, we owned 409363 self-storage facilities located in 26 states and aggregatingin the District of Columbia containing an aggregate of approximately 26.123.6 million rentable square feet.  As of December 31, 2007,2010, approximately 76.3% of the rentable square footage at our 409owned facilities were approximately 79.5%was leased to approximately 180,000152,000 tenants, and no single tenant accounted for more than 1%represented a significant concentration of our annual rental revenue.revenues.  In addition, as of December 31, 2010, we managed 93 properties for third parties, bringing the total number of properties we owned and/or managed to 456.

3



 

Our self-storage facilities are designed to offer affordable, easily-accessible and secure storage space for our residential and commercial customers.  Our customers rent storage units for their exclusive use, typically on a month-to-month basis. Additionally, some of our facilities offer outside storage areas for vehicles and boats.  Our facilities are specifically designed to accommodate both residential and commercial customers, with features such as security systems and wide aisles and load-bearing capabilities for large truck access.  All of our facilities have an on-site manager during business hours, and 307,267, or approximately 75%74%, of our facilities have a manager who resides in an apartment at the facility.  Our customers can access their storage units during business hours, and some of our facilities provide customers with 24-hour access through computer controlled access systems.syste ms.  Our goal is to provide customers with the highest standard of facilities and service in the industry. To that end, approximately 53%69% of our facilities include climate controlled units, compared to the national average of 39%36% reported by the 20072010 Self-Storage Almanac.

 

We were formed in July 2004 to succeed the self-storage operations owned directly and indirectly by Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell, and their affiliated entities and related family trusts (which entities and family trusts are referred to herein as the “Amsdell Entities”). We are organized as a REIT under Maryland law,REIT.  We own our assets and we believe that we qualify for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning with our short taxable year ended December 31, 2004. From our inception until October 2004, we did not have any operations. We commenced operations as a publicly-traded REIT in October 2004 after completing the mergers of certain Amsdell Entities with and into us, our initial public offering (“IPO”), and the consummation of various other formation transactions that occurred concurrently with, or shortly after, completion of our IPO.

We conduct all of our business through our operating partnership, U-Store-It, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”), of which we serveand its subsidiaries.  We control the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner and, its subsidiaries. Asas of December 31, 2007,2010, we heldowned an approximately 91.9% of95.4% interest in the aggregate partnership interests in our operating partnership. Since its formation in 1996, our operating partnershipOperating Partnership.  Our Operating Partnership has been engaged in virtually all aspects of the self-storage business, including the development, acquisition, ownership and operation of self-storage facilities.

 

Acquisition and Disposition Activity

 

As of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, we owned 409363 and 399367 facilities, respectively, that contained an aggregate of 26.123.6 million and 25.423.7 million rentable square feet with occupancy rates of 79.5%76.3% and 78.2%75.2%, respectively.  As of December 31, 20072010 we had facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 26 states:  Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.  A complete listing of, and certainadditional information about, our facilities is included in Item 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The following acquisitions occurred during the years ended December 31, 2007is a summary of our 2010 and 2006:2009 acquisition and disposition activity:

 

4



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Purchase / Sale Price (in

 

Facility/Portfolio

 

Transaction Date

 

Facilities

 

thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sanford Portfolio

 

January 2007

 

1

 

$

6,300

 

Grand Central Portfolio

 

January 2007

 

2

 

13,200

 

Rising Tide Portfolio

 

September 2007

 

14

 

121,000

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

$

140,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 Dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South Carolina Assets

 

May 2007

 

3

 

$

12,750

 

Arizona Assets

 

December 2007

 

2

 

6,440

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

$

19,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nashville, TN Portfolio

 

January 2006

 

2

 

$

13,100

 

Dallas, TX Portfolio

 

January 2006

 

2

 

11,500

 

U-Stor Self Storage Portfolio

 

February 2006

 

3

 

10,800

 

Sure Save Portfolio

 

February 2006

 

24

 

164,500

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

March 2006

 

4

 

22,500

 

Nickey Portfolio

 

April 2006

 

4

 

13,600

 

SecurCare Portfolio

 

May 2006

 

4

 

35,700

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

June 2006

 

1

 

6,500

 

Jernigan Portfolio

 

July 2006

 

9

 

45,300

 

U-Stor Self Storage Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

1

 

3,500

 

Bailes Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

3

 

15,600

 

In & Out Self Storage Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

1

 

7,600

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

September 2006

 

2

 

12,200

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

$

362,400

 

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of Facilities

 

Purchase / Sales
Price (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frisco Asset

 

Frisco, TX

 

July 2010

 

1

 

$

 5,800

 

New York City Assets

 

New York, NY

 

September 2010

 

2

 

26,700

 

Northeast Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ, NY and MA

 

November 2010

 

5

 

18,560

 

Manassas Asset

 

Manassas, VA

 

November 2010

 

1

 

6,050

 

Apopka Asset

 

Orlando, FL

 

November 2010

 

1

 

4,235

 

Wyckoff Asset

 

New York, NY

 

December 2010

 

1

 

13,600

 

McLearen Asset

 

McLearen, VA

 

December 2010

 

1

 

10,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

$

 85,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sun City Asset

 

Sun City, CA

 

October 2010

 

1

 

$

 3,100

 

Inland Empire/Fayetteville Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA amd NC

 

December 2010

 

15

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

$

 38,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

January 2009

 

1

 

$

 2,973

 

Albuquerque, NM Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

April 2009

 

1

 

2,825

 

S. Palmetto Asset

 

Ontario, CA

 

June 2009

 

1

 

5,925

 

Hotel Circle Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

July 2009

 

1

 

3,600

 

Jersey City Asset

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

August 2009

 

1

 

11,625

 

Dale Mabry Asset

 

Tampa, FL

 

August 2009

 

1

 

2,800

 

Winner Assets 1

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

September 2009

 

6

 

17,300

 

Baton Rouge Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

Baton Rouge, LA

 

September 2009

 

 

(b)

1,918

 

North H Street Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

September 2009

 

1

 

 

(c)

Boulder Assets (a)

 

Boulder, CO

 

September 2009

 

4

 

32,000

 

Winner Assets 2

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

October 2009

 

2

 

6,600

 

Brecksville Asset

 

Brecksville, OH

 

November 2009

 

1

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

 90,866

 

2008 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uptown Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

January 2008

 

1

 

$

 13,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

$

 2,175

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

2,400

 

Lakeland Asset

 

Lakeland, FL

 

April 2008

 

1

 

2,050

 

Endicott Asset

 

Union, NY

 

May 2008

 

1

 

2,250

 

Linden Asset

 

Linden, NJ

 

June 2008

 

1

 

2,825

 

Baton Rouge/Prairieville Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA

 

June 2008

 

2

 

5,400

 

Churchill Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS

 

August 2008

 

4

 

8,333

 

Biloxi/Gulf Breeze Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS/FL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

10,760

 

Deland Asset

 

Deland, FL

 

September 2008

 

1

 

2,780

 

Mobile Assets

 

Mobile, AL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

6,140

 

Hudson Assets

 

Hudson, OH

 

October 2008

 

2

 

2,640

 

Stuart/Vero Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

October 2008

 

2

 

4,550

 

Skipper Road Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2008

 

2

 

5,020

 

Waterway Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

December 2008

 

1

 

4,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

$

 61,958

 

 

5



Table of Contents


(a)We provided $17.6 million in seller financing to the buyer as part of the Boulder Assets disposition.  This financing was subsequently repaid during 2010.

(b)Approximately one third of the Baton Rouge Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings.  We continue to own and operate the remaining two thirds of the asset and include the asset in our total portfolio property count.

(c)The entirety of the North H Street Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings and we have removed this asset from our total portfolio asset count.  We expect to finalize compensatory terms with the State of California during 2011.

The comparability of our results of operations is affected by the timing of acquisition and disposition activities during the periods reported.  At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we owned 363 and 367 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.  The following table summarizes the change in number of owned self-storage facilities from January 1, 20062009 through December 31, 2007:2010:

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Balance - Beginning of year

 

399

 

339

 

Facilities acquired

 

17

 

60

 

Facilities consolidated

 

(2

)

 

Facilities sold

 

(5

)

 

Balance - End of year

 

409

 

399

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1

 

367

 

387

 

Facilities acquired

 

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(1

)

Balance - March 31

 

367

 

386

 

Facilities acquired

 

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(2

)

Balance - June 30

 

367

 

384

 

Facilities acquired

 

3

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(16

)

Balance - September 30

 

370

 

368

 

Facilities acquired

 

9

 

 

Facilities sold

 

(16

)

(1

)

Balance - December 31

 

363

 

367

 

 

Financing Activities

 

We entered into theThe following significant financingssummarizes certain financing activities during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:2010:

·

Amended Credit Facility.  On September 29, 2010, we amended our existing $450 million credit facility. The amended credit facility consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The amended credit facility has a three year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest at a borrowing spread based on the our leverage levels plus LIBOR. We incurred $2.5 million in connection with executing this amendment. Such costs are included as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on our consolidated balance sheet.

·

Third Party Management.  On April 28, 2010, we acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”). The transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The 85 management contracts relate to facilities located in 16 states and the District of Columbia. We paid $4.1 million in cash for the contracts and recognized $1.8 million in contingent consideration. We will account for the contingent consideration in our earnings by recording the changes in fair value of the liability.

·

FacilityAcquisitions.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, we acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $85.1 million. In connection with these acquisitions, we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.

 

·6Lehman Brothers Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan.  In July 2005, one of our subsidiaries entered into a fixed rate mortgage loan agreement with Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB in the principal amount of $80.0 million. The mortgage loan, which is secured by 24 of our self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.13% and matures in August 2012.

5



·LaSalle Bank Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan.  In August 2005, oneTable of our subsidiaries entered into a fixed rate mortgage loan agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association in the principal amount of $80.0 million. The mortgage loan, which is secured by 29 of our self-storage facilities, bears interest at 4.96% and matures in September 2012.Contents

 

·AEGON USA Fixed Rate Mortgage Loan.  In November 2005, one of our subsidiaries entered into a fixed rate mortgage loan with Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of AEGON USA Realty Advisors, Inc., in the principal amount of $72.5 million. The mortgage loan, which is secured by 36 of our self-storage facilities, bears interest at 5.97% and matures in November 2015. We assumed the obligation to enter into this loan in connection with the National Self Storage acquisition.

Facility Dispositions.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, we sold 16 self-storage facilities located throughout California and North Carolina for an aggregate sales price of approximately $38.1 million. These sales resulted in the recognition of gains that totaled $1.9 million.

·

Offering Proceeds.  During 2010, we sold 5.6 million common shares under our “at-the-market” program for an average sales price of $8.62 per share resulting in net proceeds of $47.6 million ($57.6 million of net proceeds and 8.1 million shares sold with an average sales price of $7.28 from program inception to December 31, 2010). We used the net proceeds to fund the acquisition of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.

 

·Repayment of Balance under Revolving CreditFacility.  We used a portion of the proceeds from our October 2005 public offering to pay down the outstanding balance under our then existing $150.0 million secured revolving credit facility. The facility was scheduled to terminate on October 27, 2007, with the option for us to extend the termination date to October 27, 2008.  As described below, we replaced our secured revolving credit facility with a $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility in February 2006.  Borrowings under the facility bore interest at a variable rate based upon the prime rate or LIBOR and in each case, a spread depending on our leverage ratio. The credit facility was secured by certain of our self-storage facilities and required that we maintain a minimum “borrowing base” of properties. As of December 31, 2005, we had no outstanding balance under our revolving credit facility.

·Term Loan Agreement.  In February 2006, we and our operating partnership entered into a 60-day, unsecured $30 million term loan agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association as the lender. The term loan bore interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points. The loan proceeds were used to finance a portion of the Sure Save Portfolio. The loan was paid in full from proceeds obtained upon entering into a new revolving credit facility in February 2006.

·Revolving Credit Facility.  In February 2006, we and our operating partnership entered into a three-year $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with Wachovia Bank, National Association, replacing our $150.0 million secured revolving facility. The revolving credit facility was scheduled to terminate in February 2009, but we replaced it with a new revolving credit facility in November 2006 as described below.  The terms of the revolving credit facility allowed us to increase the amount that may be borrowed up to $350.0 million at a later date, if necessary. The facility required that we satisfy certain financial coverage ratios and operating covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. Borrowings under the facility bore interest, at the Company’s option, at either an alternate base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case plus an applicable margin. The alternative base interest rate was a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points. The applicable margin for the alternative base rate varied from 0.15% to 0.60% depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Eurodollar rate was a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR. The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate varied from 1.15% to 1.60% based on the Company’s leverage ratio.

·Term Loan Agreement.  In November 2006, we and our operating partnership entered into a 30-day, unsecured $50 million term loan agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association as the lender. The term loan bears interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The loan proceeds, along with borrowings under our revolving credit facility, were used to finance the repayment of maturing secured loans. The loan was paid in full from proceeds obtained upon entering into a new revolving credit facility in November 2006.

·Revolving Credit Facility.  In November 2006, we and our operating partnership entered into a new three-year $450.0 million unsecured credit facility with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Keybanc Capital Markets, replacing our existing $250.0 million unsecured revolving facility. The facility consists of a $200 million term loan and a $250 million revolving credit facility.  The new facility has a three-year term with a one-year extension option and scheduled termination in November 2009.  Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio or our credit rating.  The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points.  The applicable margin for the alternative base rate will vary from 0.00% to 0.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grade rating, and will vary from 0.00% to 0.25% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.  The Eurodollar rate is a rate of interest that is fixed for interest periods of one, two, three or six months based on the LIBOR rate determined two business days prior to the commencement of the applicable interest period.  The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate will vary from 1.00% to 1.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grade rating, and will vary from

6



0.425% to 1.00% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.  At December 31, 2007, borrowings under the unsecured credit facility had a weighted average interest rate of 6.06%.

·Secured Term Loan.  In September 2007, we and our Operating Partnership entered into a secured term loan agreement that allows for term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $50 million. Each term loan matures on November 20, 2009, subject to extension in the sole discretion of the lenders. Each term loan bears interest at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, at our option, in each case plus an applicable margin at terms identical to the unsecured revolving credit facility.  As of December 31, 2007, there was one term loan outstanding for $47.4 million.  The outstanding term loan is secured by a pledge by our Operating Partnership of all equity interests in YSI RT LLC, the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that acquired eight self-storage facilities in September 2007.  At December 31, 2007, the outstanding term loan had an interest rate of 6.18%.

Capital Markets Activity

In October 2005, we completed a follow-on public offering, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 19,665,000 common shares (including 2,565,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ option) at an offering price of $20.35 per share, for gross proceeds of $400.2 million. The offering resulted in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriting discount and commissions and expenses of the offering, of approximately $378.7 million.

Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy consists of several elements:

 

·                  Maximize cash flow from our facilities — Our operating strategy focuses on achieving the highestmaximizing sustainable rent levelsrents at each of our facilities while at the same time meetingachieving and sustaining occupancy targets.  We utilize our operating systems and experienced personnel to manage the balance between rental rates, discounts, and physical occupancy with an objective of maximizing our rental revenue.

 

·                  Acquire facilities within our targeted markets — We will continueDuring 2011, we expect to selectively acquire facilitiescomplete selective acquisitions in markets that we believe have high barriers to entry, strong demographic fundamentals and existing supply at or below the demand for storage in the market.excess of storage capacity.  We expect to focus our evaluation of acquisition opportunities in markets where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities.  We believe the self-storage industry will continue to provideafford us with opportunities for growth through acquisitions due to the highly fragmented composition of the industry. We intend to acquire facilities primarily in areas that we consider to be growth markets, such as Arizona, California, Florida and the Northeastern United States.

·Utilize our expertise in selective newdevelopments — We seek to use our development expertise and access to multiple financing sources to pursue new developments in areas where we have facilities and perceive there to be unmet demand. We expect to pursue our development primarily in conjunction with joint venture partners.

 

Investment and Market Selection Process

 

We maintain a disciplined and focused process in the acquisition and development of self-storage facilities.  Our investment committee, which consistscomprised of certain of our executive officers and is led by Dean Jernigan, our President and Chief Executive Officer, oversees our investment process.  Our investment process involves fivesix stages — identification, initial due diligence, economic assessment, investment committee approval (and when required, Board approval) and, final due diligence, and documentation.  Through our investment committee, we intend to focus on the following criteria:

 

·                  Targeted markets — Our targeted markets include areas where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities, or where we believe that we can acquire a significant number of facilities efficiently and within a short period of time.  We evaluate both the broader market and the immediate area, typically five miles around the facility, for their ability to support above-average demographic growth.  We will seek to growincrease our presence primarily in areas that we consider to beexpect will experience growth, markets, such as Arizona,including areas within Illinois, Texas, Florida, California Florida and the Northeastern United States and to enter new markets should suitable opportunities arise.

 

·                  Quality of facility — We focus on self-storage facilities that have good visibility and are located near retail centers, which typically provide high traffic corridors and are generally located near residential communities and commercial customers.

7



 

·                  Growth potential — We target acquisitions that offer growth potential through increased operating efficiencyefficiencies and, in some cases, through additional leasing efforts, renovations or expansions.  In addition to acquiring single facilities, we seek to invest in portfolio acquisitions, searching for situations where there isincluding those offering significant potential for increased operating efficiency and anthe ability to spread our fixed costs across a large base of facilities.

From the completion of our IPO through December 31, 2007, we acquired 269 facilities totaling approximately 16.9 million rentable square feet for consideration of approximately $1.3 billion. We believe that the self-storage industry will continue to provide us with opportunities for future growth through consolidation due to the highly-fragmented composition of the industry.

 

Operating Segment

 

We have one reportable operating segment:  we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.

7



Table of Contents

 

Concentration

 

Our self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan areas as well as rural areas and have numerous tenants per facility.  No single tenant represents 1% or morerepresented a significant concentration of our 2010 revenues.  TheOur facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 19%18%, 15%, 8%10% and 7% of total revenues, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007.  Florida, California, Illinois and New Jersey provided total revenues of approximately 19%, 16%, 7% and 6%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006.of our total 2010 and 2009 revenues.

 

Seasonality

 

We typically experience minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels ofat our facilities, which arewith the levels generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

 

Financing Strategy

 

Although our organizational documents contain no limitation ondo not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, we maintain what we consider to be a conservative capital structure characterized by the use of leverage in a manner that we believe is reasonable and prudent and that will enable us to have ample cash flow to cover debt service and make distributions to our shareholders.  As of December 31, 2007,2010, our debt to total capitalization ratio determined(determined by dividing the carrying value of our total indebtedness by the sum of (a) the market value of our outstanding common shares and operating partnership units and (b) the carrying value of our total indebtedness,indebtedness) was approximately 64.1%.38.5% compared to approximately 51.9% as of December 31, 2009.  Our ratio of debt to the depreciated cost of our real estate assets as of December 31, 2010 was approximately 43.1% compared to approximately 53.7% as of December 31, 2009.  We expect to finance additional investmentsinvestme nts in self-storage facilities through the most attractive available sourcesources of capital at the time of the transaction, in a manner consistent with maintaining a strong financial position and future financial flexibility.  These capital sources may include borrowings under the revolving portion of our revolvingunsecured credit facility sellingand through additional secured financings, sales of common or preferred shares or debt securities throughin public offerings or private placements, incurring additional secured indebtedness, issuingissuances of common or preferred units in our operating partnershipOperating Partnership in exchange for contributed property, issuing preferred units in our operating partnership to institutional partnersproperties or cash and formingformations of joint ventures.  We also may consider selling less productive self-storagesell facilities from timethat we no longer view as core assets and reallocate the sales proceeds to time in order to reallocate proceeds from these sales into more productive facilities.fund other growth.

 

Competition

 

The continuedNew self-storage facility development of new self-storage facilities has intensified the competition among self-storage operators in many market areas in which we operate.  Self-storage facilities compete based on a number of factors, including location, rental rates, security, suitability of the facility’s design to prospective customers’ needs and the manner in which the facility is operated and marketed.  In particular, the number of competing self-storage facilities in a particular market could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on the overall operating performance of our facilities.  We believe that the primary competition for potential customers of any of our self-storage facilities comes from other self-storage facilities within a three-mile radius of that facility.  We believe we have positioned our facilities are well-positioned within their respective markets as high-quality operators that emphasizeand we emphasi ze customer convenience, security and professionalism.

 

Our key competitors include local and regional operators as well as the other public self-storage REITS, including Public Storage, Sovran Self Storage and Extra Space Storage Inc.  These companies, some of which operate significantly more facilities than we do and have greater resources than we have, and other entities may generally be able to accept more risk

8



than we determine is prudent for us, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of facility investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition may generally reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities available to us, increase the price required to be able to consummate the acquisition of particular facilities and reduce the demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our facilities are located.  Nevertheless, we believe that our experience in operating, acquiring, developingdevelopi ng and obtaining financing for self-storage facilities should enable us to compete effectively.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to lien sale rights and procedures and various federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released on or in its property.  These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.  The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, when released, may

8



Table of Contents

adversely affect the property owner’s ability to sell the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral, and may cause the property owner to incur substantial remediation costs.  In addition to claims for cleanup costs, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in a claim by a private party for personal injury or a claim by an adjacent property owner or user for property damage.  We may also become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances stored at the facilities by a customer even though storage of hazardous substances would be without our knowledge or approval and in violation of the customer’s storage lease agreement with us.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  Whenever the environmental assessment for one of our facilities indicates that a facility is impacted by soil or groundwater contamination from prior owners/operators or other sources, we will work with our environmental consultants and, where appropriate, state governmental agencies, to ensure that the facility is either cleaned up, that no cleanup is necessary because the low level of contamination poses no significant risk to public health or the environment, or that the responsibility for cleanup rests with a third party.

 

We are not aware of any environmental cleanup liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  We cannot assure you, however, that these environmental assessments and investigations have revealed or will reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that no prior owner created any material environmental condition not known to us or the independent consultant or that future events or changes in environmental laws will not result in the imposition of environmental liability on us.

 

We have not received notice from any governmental authority of any material noncompliance, claim or liability in connection with any of our facilities, nor have we been notified of a claim for personal injury or property damage by a private party in connection with any of our facilities relating to environmental conditions.

 

We are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our facilities that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and we do not expect that the cost of compliance with environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  We cannot assure you, however, that this will continue to be the case.

 

Insurance

 

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, flooding,environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorist activities, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses.  We also carry liability insurance to insure against personal injuries that might be sustained on our propert ies and director and officer liability insurance.

9



 

Offices

 

Our principal executive office is located at 50 Public Square,460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 2800, Cleveland, OH 44113.3000, Wayne, PA  19087.  Our telephone number is (216) 274-1340.(610) 293-5700.  We believe that our current facilities are adequate for our present and future operations.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2007,2010, we employed approximately 9891,172 employees, of whom approximately 112178 were corporate executive and administrative personnel and approximately 877994 were property level personnel.  We believe that our relations with our employees are good.  None of ourOur employees are not unionized.

 

Available Information

 

We file registration statements, proxy statements, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  You may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.  Our

9



Table of Contents

internet website address is www.ustoreit.com.  You also can obtain on our website, free of charge, a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports or amendments with, or furnish them to, the SEC.  Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Also available on our website, free of charge, are copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for each of the committees of our Board of Trustees — the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Compensation Committee. Copies of each of these documents are also available in print free of charge, upon request by any shareholder.  You can obtain copies of these documents by contacting Investor Relations by mail at 460 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 3000, Wayne, PA 19087.

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

Overview

 

Investors should carefully consider, among other factors, the risks set forth below. These risks are not the only ones that we may face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations and hinder our ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

 

Risks Related to our Business and Operations

Our performanceAdverse macroeconomic and the valuebusiness conditions may significantly and negatively affect our revenues, profitability and results of our self-storage facilities are subject to risks associated with our properties and with the real estate industry.operations.

The United States has recently experienced an economic slowdown that has resulted in higher unemployment, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets.  Our rental revenuesresults of operations may be sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures.  A continuation of ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and operatingenergy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services.  A general reduction in the valuelevel of our real estate assets, and consequently the value of our securities, are subject to the risk that if our facilities do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, our cash flow and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.  Eventsdiscretionary spending or conditions beyond our control that mayshifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our operationsgrowth and profitability.

It is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the economic and financial market problems and the many ways in which they may affect our customers and our business in general.  Nonetheless, continuation or further worsening of these difficult financial and macroeconomic conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our sales, profitability and results of operations.

Many states and local jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

Many states and jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems.  Action that may be taken in response to these problems, such as increases in property taxes on commercial properties, changes to sales taxes or other governmental efforts, including mandating medical insurance for employees, could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

Our financial performance is dependent upon the valueeconomic and other conditions of the markets in which our facilities are located.

We are susceptible to adverse developments in the markets in which we operate, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors.  Our facilities in Florida, California,  Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, Illinois and Arizona accounted for approximately 16%, 14%, 12%, 8%, 7%, 7% and 5%, respectively, of our total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2010.  As a result of this geographic concentration of our facilities, include:

·downturnswe are particularly susceptible to adverse market conditions in these areas.  Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, or in any of the national, regional and local economic climate;

·localother markets in which we operate, or regional oversupply, increased competition or reductionany decrease in demand for self-storage space;

·vacancies, changes in market rents for self-storage space;

·inability to collect rentspace resulting from customers;

·increased operating costs, including maintenance, insurance premiums and real estate taxes;

·changes in interest rates and availability of financing;

10



·hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters, civil disturbances, terrorist acts or acts of war that may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;

·significant expenditures associated with acquisitions and development projects, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property;

·costs of complying with changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

·the relative illiquidity of real estate investments.

In addition, prolonged periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for self-storage, or the public perception that any of these events may occur,local business climate could result in a general decline inadversely affect our rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions to our shareholders.

10



Table of Contents

We face risks associated with facility acquisitions.

We have in the past acquired, and intend at some time in the future to acquire, individual and portfolios of self-storage facilities that would increase our size and potentially alter our capital structure.  Although we believe that the acquisitions that we expect to undertake in the future will enhance our future financial performance, the success of such transactions is subject to a number of factors, including the risks that:

·we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms;

·acquisitions may fail to perform as expected;

·the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired facilities may be higher than our estimates;

·acquisitions may be located in new markets where we may have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area or an unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;

·there is only limited recourse, or no recourse, to the former owners of newly acquired facilities for unknown or undisclosed liabilities such as the clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination; claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the facilities; ordinary course of business expenses; and claims by local governments, adjoining property owners, property owner associations, and easement holders for fees, assessments, taxes on other property-related changes.

As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of an acquired facility, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our financial results and cash flow.

We will incur costs and will face integration challenges when we acquire additional facilities.

As we acquire or develop additional self-storage facilities, we will be subject to risks associated with integrating and managing new facilities, including customer retention and mortgage default risks. In the case of a large portfolio purchase, we could experience strains in our existing management information capacity.  In addition, acquisitions or developments may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management’s attention away from day-to-day operations.  Furthermore, our profitability may suffer because we will be required to expense acquisition-related costs and amortize in future periods costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.  Our failure to successfully integrate any future facilities into our portfolio could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Rental revenues are significantlyThe acquisition of new facilities that lack operating history with us will give rise to difficulties in predicting revenue potential.influenced by demand for self-storage space generally, and a decrease in such demandwould likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

 

BecauseWe intend to continue to acquire additional facilities.  These acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with expectations.  If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, rental rates, operating costs or costs of improvements to bring an acquired facility up to the standards established for our portfoliointended market position, the performance of the facility may be below expectations.  Acquired facilities may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered.  We cannot assure you that the performance of facilities consists primarily of self-storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry. A decrease in the demand for self-storage space would have a greater adverse effect onacquired by us will increase or be maintained under our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio. Demand for self-storage space has been and could be adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies, changes in supply of, or demand for, similar or competing self-storage facilities in an area and the excess amount of self-storage space in a particular market. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for self-storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue. Any such decrease could impair our ability to satisfy debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.management.

 

We face risks associated with actions taken bydepend on external sources of capital that are outside of our competitors.control; the unavailability of capital from external sources could adversely affect our ability to acquire or develop facilities, satisfy our debt obligations and/or make distributions to shareholders.

 

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increasesWe depend on external sources of the occupancycapital to fund acquisitions and rental rates of our properties.  We compete with other owners and operators of self-storage, some of which own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located.  If our competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may lose potential tenants, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when our tenants’ leases expire.  As a result, our financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution, market price of our stock and abilityfacility development, to satisfy our debt service obligations couldand to make the required distributions to our shareholders in order to maintain our status as a REIT, which may or may not be materially adversely affected.

We face risks relatedavailable on favorable terms, if at all.  Our access to balloon payments.

Approximately 50% (or approximately $573.5 million)external sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market’s perception of our mortgagegrowth potential and revolving indebtedness is due on or before December 31, 2009.  Certainour current and potential future earnings and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  If we are unable to obtain external sources of our mortgages will have significant outstanding balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.”  There can be no assurance thatcapital, we willmay not be able to refinance theacquire or develop facilities when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our debt on favorable termsobligations or at all. To the extent we cannot refinance debt on favorable termsmake distributions to shareholders that would permit us to qualify as a REIT or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which would have an adverse impactavoid paying tax on our financial performance and ability to pay dividends to investors.REIT taxable income.

11



Table of Contents

 

Rising operating expenses could reduce our cash flow and funds available for future distributions.

 

Our facilities and any other facilities we acquire or develop in the future are and will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us.  Our facilities are subject to increases in operating expenses such as real estate and other taxes, personnel costs including the cost of providing specific medical coverage to our employees, utilities, insurance, administrative expenses and costs for repairs and maintenance.  If operating expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish and limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

11



We face risks associated with facility acquisitions that could impedecannot assure you of our growth.ability to pay dividends in the future.

Historically, we have paid quarterly distributions to our shareholders, and we intend to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our shareholders in amounts such that all or substantially all of our taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments, is distributed.  This, along with other factors, should enable us to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.  We have innot established a minimum dividends payment level and all future distributions will be made at the past acquired, and intend in the futurediscretion of our Board of Trustees.  Our ability to acquire, individual and portfolios of self-storage facilities that would increase our size and potentially alter our capital structure.  Although we believe that the acquisitions that we expect to undertake in the futurepay dividends will enhance our future financial performance, the success of such transactions is subject to a number of factors, including the risk that:depend upon, among other factors:

 

·                we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms;the operational and financial performance of our facilities;

 

·                acquisitions may failcapital expenditures with respect to performexisting and newly acquired facilities;

·general and administrative costs associated with our operation as expected;a publicly-held REIT;

·maintenance of our REIT status;

 

·                the actual costsamount of, repositioning or redeveloping acquired facilities may be higher thanand the interest rates on, our estimates;debt;

·the absence of significant expenditures relating to environmental and other regulatory matters; and

 

·                acquisitions may be locatedother risk factors described in new markets where we may have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area or an unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

We also faceCertain of these matters are beyond our control and any significant competition for acquisitionsdifference between our expectations and development opportunities.  Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire facilities.  These competitors may also be willing and/or able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our facilities are located and, as a result, adversely affect our operating results.

Financing our future growth plan or refinancing existing debt maturities could be impacted by negative capital market conditions.

Recently, domestic financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. While this condition has occurred most visibly within the “subprime” mortgage lending sector of the credit market, liquidity has tightened in overall domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity capital markets. Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit markets in order to attract financing on reasonable terms nor can there be any assurance we can issue common or preferred equity securities at a reasonable price. Our ability to finance new acquisitions as well as our ability to refinance debt maturities could be adversely affected by our inability to secure permanent financing on reasonable terms, if at all.

We may not be able to adapt our management and operation systems to respond to theintegration of additional facilities without disruption or expense.

From the completion of our IPO in October 2004 through December 31, 2007, we acquired 269 facilities, containing approximately 15.6 million rentable square feet for an aggregate cost of approximately $1.3 billion. In 2008 we acquired two additional self-storage facilities.  In addition, we expect to acquire additional self-storage facilities in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be able to adapt our management, administrative, accounting and operational systems or hire and retain sufficient operational staff to integrate these facilities into our portfolio and manage any future acquisition or development of additional facilities without operating disruptions or unanticipated costs. As we acquire or develop additional facilities, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new facilities, including customer retention and mortgage default risks. In addition, acquisitions or developments may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management’s attention away from day-to-day operations. Furthermore, our profitability may suffer because of acquisition-related costs or amortization costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Our failure to successfully integrate any future facilities into our portfolioactual results could have ana material adverse effect on our operating costscash flow and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

AcquiredIf we are unable to promptly re-let our units or if the rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected, then our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

We derive revenues principally from rents received from customers who rent units at our self-storage facilities may subject us to unknown liabilities.

Facilities that we have acquired or may acquireunder month-to-month leases.  Any delay in the future may be subject to unknown liabilities for which were-letting units as vacancies arise would have no recourse, or only limited recourse, to the former owners of such facilities.  As a result, if a liability were asserted against us basedreduce our revenues and harm our operating results.  In addition, lower than expected rental rates upon ownership of an acquired facility, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, whichre-letting could adversely affect our financial resultsrevenues and cash flow.  Unknown liabilities relating to acquired facilities could include:impede our growth.

 

12



·liabilities for clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination;

·claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the facilities; and

·liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business.

We face significant competition from other developers, owners and operators in the self-storage industry.

We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators in the self-storage industry, including other REITs, some of which own or may in the future own facilities similar to ours in the same markets in which our facilities are located, and some of which may have greater capital resources. In addition, due to the relatively low cost of each individual self-storage facility, other developers, owners and operators have the capability to build additional facilities that may compete with our facilities.

If our competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential customers and we may be pressured to discount our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain customers. As a result, our rental revenues may decrease, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to pay distributions to our shareholders. In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to facilities that we would not have otherwise made. Any unbudgeted capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

Property ownership through joint ventures may limit our ability to act exclusively in our interest.

We have in the past, and may continue to, co-invest with third parties through joint ventures.  In any such joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the facilities owned through joint ventures. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions.  Joint venture partners may have business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.  Such investments also have the potential risk of impasse on strategic decisions, such as a sale, becausein cases where neither we nor the joint venture partner would have full controlcontro l over the joint venture. In other circumstances, joint venture partners may have the ability without our agreement to make certain major decisions, including decisions about sales, capital expenditures and/or financing.  Any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that could increase our expenses and distract our officers and/or Trustees from focusing their time and effort on our business.  In addition, we might in certain

12



Table of Contents

circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners, and the activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, even though we do not control the joint venture.

 

Because real estate is illiquid,We face risks and significant competition associated with actions taken by our competitors.

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases of the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.  We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of self-storage, including other REITs, some of which own or may in the future own properties similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our properties are located and some of which may have greater capital resources.  In addition, due to the relatively low cost of each individual self-storage facility, other developers, owners and operators have the capability to build additional facilities that may compete with our facilities.

If our competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants, we may notlose potential tenants, and we may be ablepressured to sell propertiesreduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenants when appropriate.

Real estate property investments generally cannotour tenants’ leases expire.  As a result, our financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution, market price of our stock and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be sold quickly. Also, the tax laws applicablematerially adversely affected.  In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to REITs requiremake capital improvements to facilities that we holdwould not have otherwise made.  Any unbudgeted capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

We also face significant competition for acquisitions and development opportunities.  Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire facilities.  These competitors may also be willing to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our facilities for investment, rather than sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of facilities that otherwise would be in our best interest. Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or on favorable terms, in response to economic or other market conditions, which mayare located and, as a result, adversely affect our financial position.operating results.

 

We face system security risks as we depend upon automated processesmay become subject to litigation or threatened litigation which may divert management’s time and attention, require us to pay damages and expenses or restrict the Internet.operation of our business.

 

We are increasingly dependent upon automated information technology processes.  Whilemay become subject to disputes with commercial parties with whom we attemptmaintain relationships or other parties with whom we do business.  Any such dispute could result in litigation between us and the other parties.  Whether or not any dispute actually proceeds to mitigate this risk through offsite backup procedureslitigation, we may be required to devote significant management time and contracted data centers that include, in some cases, redundant operations, weattention to its successful resolution (through litigation, settlement or otherwise), which would detract from our management’s ability to focus on our business.  Any such resolution could stillinvolve the payment of damages or expenses by us, which may be severely impacted by a catastrophic occurrence, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.significant.  In addition, an increasing portionany such resolution could involve our agreement with terms that restrict the operation of our business operations are conducted over the Internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system failures and disruptions of operations despite our deployment of anti-virus measures. Experienced computer programmers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns.business.

 

13One type of commercial dispute could involve our use of our brand name and other intellectual property (for example, logos, signage and other marks), for which we generally have common law rights but no federal trademark registration.  There are other commercial parties, at both a local and national level, that may assert that our use of our brand names and other intellectual property conflict with their rights to use brand names and other intellectual property that they consider to be similar to ours.  Any such commercial dispute and related resolution would involve all of the risks described above, including, in particular, our agreement to restrict the use of our brand name or other intellectual property.



We also could be sued for personal injuries and/or property damage occurring on our properties.  We maintain liability insurance with limits that we believe adequate to provide for the defense and/or payment of any damages arising from such lawsuits.  There can be no assurance that such coverage will cover all costs and expenses from such suits.

 

Potential losses may not be covered by insurance, which could result in the loss of our investment in a facility and the future cash flows from the facility.

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, flooding and environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorism, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be

13



Table of Contents

sufficient to cover losses.  If we experience a loss at a facility that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in that facility as well as the anticipated future cash flows from that facility.  Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it impractical or undesirable to use insurance proceeds to replace a facility after it has been damaged or destroyed.  In addition, if the damaged facilities are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these facilities were irreparably damaged.

 

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or warOur insurance coverage may adversely impact our performance and may affect the markets on which our securities are traded.not comply fully with certain loan requirements.

Terrorist attacks againstCertain of our properties serve as collateral for our mortgage-backed debt, some of which was assumed in connection with our acquisition of facilities that requires us to maintain insurance at levels and on terms that are not commercially reasonable in the United States current insurance environment.  We may be unable to obtain required insurance coverage if the cost and/or availability make it impractical or impossible to comply with debt covenants.  If we cannot comply with a lender’s requirements in any respect, the lender could declare a default that could affect our interests, may negatively impactability to obtain future financing and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows and our ability to obtain future financing.  In addition, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or the value of our securities.  Attacks or armed conflicts could negatively impact the demand for self-storage facilities and increase the cost ofCompany’s insurance coverage for our facilities, which could reduce our profitability and cash flow.  Furthermore, any terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could result in increased volatility in or damage to the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy.costs may increase.

Potential liability for environmental contamination could result in substantial costs.

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.  If we fail to comply with those laws, we could be subject to significant fines or other governmental sanctions.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a facility and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean up costs incurred by such parties in connection with contamination.  Such liability may be imposed whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of these hazardous or toxic substances.  The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such facility or to borrow using such facility as collateral.  In addition, in connection with the ownership, operation and management of real properties, we are potentially liable for property damage or injuries to persons and property.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  We obtain or examine environmental assessments from qualified and reputable environmental consulting firms (and intend to conduct such assessments prior to the acquisition or development of additional facilities).  The environmental assessments received to date have not revealed, nor aredo we awarehave actual knowledge of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  However, we cannot assure you that any environmental assessments performed have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions, that any prior owner of any facility did not create a material environmental condition not actually known to us or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist with respect to any of our facilities.

 

Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable state accessibility act compliance may require unanticipated expenditures.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (theand applicable state accessibility act laws (collectively, the “ADA”), all places of public accommodation are required to meet federal requirements related to physical access and use by disabled persons.  A number of other federal, state and local laws may also impose access and other similar requirements at our facilities.  A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements could result in the governmental imposition of fines or the award of damages to private litigants affected by the noncompliance.  Although we believe that our facilities comply in all material respects with these requirements (or would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material requirements because of adaptive assistance provided), a

14



determination that one or more of our facilities is not in compliance with the ADA or similars imilar state or local requirements would result in the incurrence of additional costs associated with bringing the facilities into compliance.  If we are required to make substantial modifications to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements, we may be required to incur significant unanticipated expenditures.expenditures, which could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

14



Table of Contents

 

WePrivacy concerns could result in regulatory changes that may become subject to litigation or threatened litigation which may divert management time and attention, require us to pay damages and expenses or restrict the operation ofharm our business.

 

Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the jurisdictions in which we operate.  Many jurisdictions in which we operate have imposed restrictions and requirements on the use of personal information by those collecting such information. Changes to law or regulations affecting privacy, if applicable to our business, could impose additional costs and liability on us and could limit our use and disclosure of such information.

We face system security risks as we depend upon automated processes and the Internet.

We are increasingly dependent upon automated information technology processes.  While we attempt to mitigate this risk through offsite backup procedures and contracted data centers that include, in some cases, redundant operations, we could still be severely impacted by a catastrophic occurrence, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.  In addition, an increasing portion of our business operations are conducted over the Internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system failures and disruptions of operations despite our deployment of anti-virus measures.  Experienced computer programmers may become subjectbe able to disputes with commercial parties with whom we maintain relationshipspenetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns.

Terrorist attacks and other parties with whom we do business. Any such disputeacts of violence or war may adversely impact our performance and may affect the markets on which our securities are traded.

Terrorist attacks against our facilities, the United States or our interests, may negatively impact our operations and the value of our securities.  Attacks or armed conflicts could negatively impact the demand for self-storage facilities and increase the cost of insurance coverage for our facilities, which could reduce our profitability and cash flow.  Furthermore, any terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could result in litigation between usincreased volatility in or damage to the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy.

Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry

Our performance and the other parties. Whether or not any dispute actually proceeds to litigation, we may be required to devote significant management time and attention to its successful resolution (through litigation, settlement or otherwise), which would detract from our management’s ability to focus on our business. Any such resolution could involve the payment of damages or expenses by us, which may be significant. In addition, any such resolution could involve our agreement with terms that restrict the operationvalue of our business.

One type of commercial dispute could involve our use of our brand name and other intellectual property (for example, logos, signage and other marks), for which we generally have common law rights but no federal trademark registration. There are other commercial parties, at both a local and national level, that may assert that our use of our brand names and other intellectual property conflict with their rights to use brand names and other intellectual property that they consider to be similar to ours. Any such commercial dispute and related resolution would involve all of the risks described above, including, in particular, our agreement to restrict the use of our brand name or other intellectual property.

The terms and covenants relating to our indebtedness could adversely impact our economic performance.

Like other real estate companies that incur debt, weself-storage facilities are subject to risks associated with debt financing, such asour properties and with the insufficiencyreal estate industry.

Our rental revenues and operating costs and the value of cash flowour real estate assets, and consequently the value of our securities, are subject to the risk that if our facilities do not generate revenues sufficient to meet requiredour operating expenses, including debt service payment obligations and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness.  If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, we may not be able to make distributions to shareholders at expected levels or at all and may not be able to acquire new properties.  Failure to make distributions to our shareholders could result in our failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  Furthermore, an increase in our interest expense could adversely affectcapital expenditures, our cash flow and ability to makepay distributions to shareholders.  If we do not meet our debt service obligations, any facilities securing such indebtedness couldshareholders will be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect onadversely affected.  Events or conditions beyond our cash flow and ability to make distributions and, depending on the number of facilities foreclosed on, could threaten our continued viability.

Our unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loan each contain (and any new or amended facility will likely contain) customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including total debt to asset ratios, secured debt to total asset ratios, debt service coverage ratios and minimum ratios of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt which we must maintain.  Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is (and any new or amended facility will be) subject to compliance with such financial and other covenants.  In the eventcontrol that we fail to satisfy these covenants, we would be in default under the credit facility and term loan and may be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources.  Under such circumstances, other sources of debt or equity capital may not be available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.

Increases in interest rates on variable rate indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  Rising interest rates could also restrict our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures.  In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts that third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to alter our portfolio promptly in relation to economicoperations or other conditions.  We have entered into and may, from time to time, enter into agreements such as interest rate hedges, swaps, floors, caps and other interest rate hedging contracts with respect to a portion of our variable rate debt.  Although these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that we cannot enforce the agreements.

Our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.  As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future.

15



Our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or our operating partnership may incur. We could alter the balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our assets at any time. If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness and to pay our anticipated distributions and/or the distributions required to maintain our REIT status, and could harm our financial condition.

Our ability to make distributions is subject to various risks.

Historically, we have paid quarterly distributions to our shareholders.  Our ability to make distributions in the future will depend upon:facilities include but are not limited to:

 

·                  downturns in the operationalnational, regional and financial performance of our facilities;local economic climate;

 

·                  capital expenditures with respect to existing and newly acquired facilities;local or regional oversupply, increased competition or reduction in demand for self-storage space;

 

·                  general and administrative costs associated with our operation as a publicly-held REIT;vacancies or changes in market rents for self-storage space;

 

·                  the amount of,inability to collect rent from customers;

·increased operating costs, including maintenance, insurance premiums and thereal estate taxes;

·changes in interest rates on, our debt;and availability of financing;

·hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters, civil disturbances, terrorist acts or acts of war that may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;

·significant expenditures associated with acquisitions and development projects, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property;

15



Table of Contents

·costs of complying with changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

 

·                  the absencerelative illiquidity of significant expenditures relating to environmental and other regulatory matters.real estate investments.

 

CertainIn addition, prolonged periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for self-storage, or the public perception that any of these mattersevents may occur, could result in a general decline in rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.

Rental revenues are beyond our controlsignificantlyinfluenced by demand for self-storage space generally, and any significant difference between our expectations and actual results coulda decrease in such demandwould likely have a materialgreater adverse effect on our cash flowrental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

Because our portfolio of facilities consists primarily of self-storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry.  A decrease in the demand for self-storage space would have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.  Demand for self-storage space has been and could be adversely affected by ongoing weakness in the national, regional and local economies, changes in supply of, or demand for, similar or competing self-storage facilities in an area and the excess amount of self-storage space in a particular market. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for self-storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue.  Any such decrease could impair our ability to satisfy debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.

 

We depend on external sources of capital that are outside of our control; the unavailability of capital from external sources could adversely affect our ability to acquire or develop facilities, satisfy our debt obligations and/or make distributions to shareholders.

To continue to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains or pay applicable income taxes. In order to eliminate federal income tax, we will be required to distribute annually 100% of our net taxable income, including capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we likely will not be able to fund all future capital needs, including capital for acquisitions and facility development, with income from operations. We therefore will have to rely on third-party sources of capital, which may or may not be available on favorable terms, if at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of things, including the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If we are unable to obtain third-party sources of capital,real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to acquiresell properties when appropriate.

Real estate property investments generally cannot be sold quickly.  Also, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our facilities for investment, rather than sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or developdefer sales of facilities when strategic opportunities exist, satisfythat otherwise would be in our debt obligationsbest interest.  Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or make distributionson favorable terms, in response to shareholders that would permit useconomic or other market conditions, which may adversely affect our financial position.

Risks Related to our Qualification and Operation as a REIT

Failure to qualify as a REIT or avoid paying tax on our REIT taxable income.

If we failwould subject us to qualify as a REIT, our distributions to shareholders would not bedeductible forU.S. federal income tax purposes, and therefore we would be required to paycorporate income  tax at applicable rates on our taxable income, which would substantiallyreduce our earnings and may substantially reduce the value ofcash available for distribution to our common shares andadversely affect our ability to raise additional capitalshareholders..

 

We operate our business to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not binding on the IRS or any court.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the income that we distribute currently to our shareholders.  Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex.  The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control.  For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, such as rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws.  In addition, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot own specified amounts of debt and equity securities of some issuers.  We also are required to distribute to our shareholders with respect to each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding,excluding net capital gains).gains.  The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through the operating partnershipOperating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements for us.  Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status and, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs and the ongoing importance of factual determinations, we cannot provide any assurance that we will continue to qualify as a REIT.  Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and

16



the courts might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT.  If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and are able to avail ourselves of one or more of the statutory savings provisions in order to maintain our REIT status, we would nevertheless be required to pay penalty taxes of $50,000 or more for each such failure.

 

If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and are unable to avail ourselves of certain savings provisions set forth in the Internal Revenue Code, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates on all of our income.  As a taxable corporation, we would not be allowed to take a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income or pass through long term capital gains to individual shareholders at favorable rates.  We also could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes.  We would not be able to

16



Table of Contents

elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify unless the IRS were to grant us relief under certain statutory provisions.  If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes, which would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to our shareholders.  This likely would have a significant adverse effect on our earnings and likely would adversely affect the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to pay any distributions to shareholders.

 

Failure of the Operating Partnership (or a subsidiary partnership) to be treated as a partnership would have serious adverse consequences to out shareholders.

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the tax status of the Operating Partnership or any of its subsidiary partnerships for federal income tax purposes, the Operating Partnership or the affected subsidiary partnership would be taxable as a corporation.  In such event we would cease to qualify as a REIT and the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership or a subsidiary partnership would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution from the Operating Partnership to us and ultimately to our shareholders.

To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds on a short term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

As a REIT, we are subject to certain distribution requirements, including the requirement to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income, that may result in our having to make distributions at a disadvantageous time or to borrow funds at unfavorable rates.  Compliance with this requirement may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

 

We will pay some taxes even if we qualify as a REIT.REIT, which will reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

 

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.  For example, we will be subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including capital gains.  Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which dividends paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax.  In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.  The determination as tot o whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale.  We cannot guarantee that sales of our properties would not be prohibited transactions unless we comply with certain statutory safe-harbor provisions. The need to avoid prohibited transactions could cause us to forego or defer sales of facilities that our predecessors otherwise would have sold or that might otherwise be in our best interest to sell.

 

In addition, any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax.  We have elected to treat some of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, including U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co. as a taxable REIT subsidiary,, and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future.  In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation.  For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT.  In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some paymentspa yments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.  Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs.  To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

 

We face possible federal, state and local tax audits.

Because we are organized and qualify as a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but are subject to certain state and local taxes.  Certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone, or are currently undergoing, tax audits.  Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions in the ongoing audits, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance on the specific point at issue.  Collectively, tax deficiency notices received to date from the jurisdictions conducting the ongoing audits have not been

17



Table of Contents

material.  However, there can be no assurance that future audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Risks Related to our Debt Financings

We face risks related to current debt maturities, including refinancing and counterparty risk.

Certain of our mortgages will have significant outstanding balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.”  We may not have the cash resources available to repay those amounts, and we may have to raise funds for such repayment either through the issuance of capital stock, additional borrowings (which may include extension of maturity dates), joint ventures or asset sales.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance the debt on favorable terms or at all.  To the extent we cannot assure yourefinance debt on favorable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which would have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to pay dividends to investors

In addition, we may be exposed to the potential risk of counterparty default or non-payment with respect to interest rate hedges, swap agreements, floors, caps and other interest rate hedging contracts that we may enter into from time to time, in which event we could suffer a material loss on the value of those agreements.  Although these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that we cannot enforce the agreements.  There is no assurance that our potential counterparties on these agreements are likely to perform their obligations under such agreements.

Financing our future growth plan or refinancing existing debt maturities could be impacted by negative capital market conditions.

Recently, domestic financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and uncertainty.  Overall liquidity has tightened in the domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity capital markets for which we historically sought financing.  Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit markets in order to attract financing on reasonable terms nor can there be any assurance we can issue common or preferred equity securities at a reasonable price.  Our ability to finance new acquisitions and refinance future debt maturities could be adversely impacted by our inability to secure permanent financing on reasonable terms, if at all.

The terms and covenants relating to our indebtedness could adversely impact our economic performance.

Like other real estate companies that incur debt, we are subject to risks associated with debt financing, such as the insufficiency of cash flow to meet required debt service payment obligations and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness.  If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, we may not be able to make distributions to shareholders at expected levels or at all and may not be able to acquire new properties.  Failure to make distributions to our shareholders could result in our failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  Furthermore, an increase in our interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  If we do not meet our debt service obligations, any facilities securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect on our cas h flow and ability to make distributions and, depending on the number of facilities foreclosed on, could threaten our continued viability.

Our credit facility contains (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will likely contain) customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that, among other things, require us to comply with certain liquidity and net worth tests.  Our ability to borrow under our credit facility is (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will be) subject to compliance with such financial and other covenants.  In the event that we fail to satisfy these covenants, we would be in default under the credit facility and may be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources.  Under such circumstances, other sources of debt or equity capital may not be available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.  Moreover, the presence of such covenants in our credit agreements could cause us to ope rate our business with a view toward compliance with such covenants, which might not produce optimal returns for shareholders.

Increases in interest rates on variable rate indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  Rising interest rates could also restrict our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures.  In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts that third parties

18



Table of Contents

are willing to pay dividendsfor our assets, thereby limiting our ability to alter our portfolio promptly in relation to economic or other conditions.

Our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.  As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future.

 

Our organizational documents contain no limitations on the amount of indebtedness that we or our Operating Partnership may incur.  We intend to pay quarterly dividendscould alter the balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and to make distributions to our shareholders in amounts such that all or substantially allthe value of our taxable incomeassets at any time.  If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in each year, subject to certain adjustments, is distributed.  This, along with other factors, should enable us to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.  We have not established a minimum dividends payment level anddebt service could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  All distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will dependmake payments on our earnings,outstanding indebtedness and to pay our financial condition, maintenance ofanticipated distributions and/or the distributions required to maintain our REIT status, and such other factors ascould harm our Board of Trustees may deem relevant from time to time.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to pay dividends in the future.financial condition.

 

17Risks Related to our Organization and Structure



 

We are dependent upon our key personnelsenior management team whose continued service is not guaranteed.

Our top executives, Dean Jernigan, Christopher Marr, Kathleen Weigand, Stephen Nichols and Timothy Martin,executive team, including our Named Executive Officers, have extensive self-storage, real estate and public company experience.  Although we have employment agreements with all of thethese members of our senior management team, we cannot provide any assurance that any of them will remain in our employ.employment.  The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team particularly Dean Jernigan, our President and Chief Executive Officer, could adversely affect our operations and our future growth.

 

We are dependent upon our on-site personnel to maximize customer satisfaction; any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training and retaining skilled field personnel may adversely affect our rental revenues.

 

As of December 31, 2007,2010, we had approximately 880994 field personnel involved in the management and operation of our facilities.  The customer service, marketing skills and knowledge of local market demand and competitive dynamics of our facility managers are contributing factors to our ability to maximize our rental income and to achieve the highest sustainable rent levels at each of our facilities.  We compete with various other companies in attracting and retaining qualified and skilled personnel. Competitive pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel.  If there is an increase in these costs or if we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our business and operating results could be harmed.

Our insurance coverage may not comply fully with certain loan requirements.

We maintain comprehensive insurance on each of our self-storage facilities in amounts sufficient to permit replacement of the property, subject to applicable deductibles. Certain of our properties serve as collateral for our mortgage-backed debt, some of which was assumed in connection with our acquisition of facilities, that requires us to maintain insurance at levels and on terms that are not commercially reasonable in the current insurance environment. We may be unable to obtain required insurance coverage if the cost and/or availability make it impractical or impossible to comply with debt covenants. If we cannot comply with a lender’s requirements in any respect, the lender could declare a default that could affect our ability to obtain future financing and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows and our ability to obtain future financing. In addition, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or the Company’s insurance costs may increase.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control, which may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for our shares or otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of those shares, including:

 

·         “business combination moratorium/fair price” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter imposes stringent fair price and super-majority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

 

·         “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing Trustees) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares” from a party other than the issuer) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares, and are subject to redemption in certain circumstances.

 

We have opted out of these provisions of Maryland law.  However, our Board of Trustees may opt to make these provisions applicable to us at any time.time without shareholder approval.

 

1819



Table of Contents

Our Trustees also have the discretion, granted in our bylaws and Maryland law, without shareholder approval to, among other things (1) create a staggered Board of Trustees, and (2) amend our bylaws or repeal individual bylaws in a manner that provides the Board of Trustees with greater authority.  Any such action could inhibit or impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us at a price that could be beneficial to our shareholders.

 

Robert J. Amsdell, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Barry L. Amsdell, a former Trustee; Todd C. Amsdell, our former Chief Operating Officer and former President of our development subsidiary; and the Amsdell Entities (collectively, “The Amsdell Family”) collectively own an approximate 23.3%13.3% beneficial interest in our company on a fully diluted basis and therefore have the ability to exercise significant influence on any matter presented to our shareholders.

 

The Amsdell Family collectively owns approximately 21.3%11.97% of our outstanding common shares, and an approximate 23.3% 13.3%beneficial interest in our company on a fully diluted basis.  Consequently, the Amsdell Family may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for shareholder action, including the election of our Board of Trustees and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers.  As a result, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell have substantial influence on us and could exercise their influence in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our other shareholders.

Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell have interests, through their ownership of limited partner unitsin our operating partnership that may conflict with the interests of our othershareholders.

Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell own limited partner units in our operating partnership. These individuals may have personal interests that conflict with the interests of our shareholders with respect to business decisions affecting us and our operating partnership, such as interests in the timing and pricing of facility sales or refinancings in order to obtain favorable tax treatment.

 

Our shareholders have limited control to prevent us from making any changes to our investment and financing policies.

 

Our Board of Trustees has adopted policies with respect to certain activities.  These policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Trustees without a vote of our shareholders.  This means that our shareholders have limited control over changes in our policies.  Such changes in our policies intended to improve, expand or diversify our business may not have the anticipated effects and consequently may adversely affect our business and prospects, results of operations and share price.

 

Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our Trustees and officers are limited.

 

Maryland law provides that a trustee or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.  Our declaration of trust and bylaws require us to indemnify our Trustees and officers for actions taken on behalf of the Company by them in those capacities to the extent permitted by Maryland law.  Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any Trustee or officer impede our performance, our and our shareholders’ ability to recover damages from that Trustee or officer will be limited.

Many factors could have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

A number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control.  These factors include:

·increases in market interest rates, relative to the dividend yield on our shares.  If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of our securities may require a higher yield.  Higher market interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution.  Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common shares to go down;

·anticipated benefit of an investment in our securities as compared to investment in securities of companies in other industries (including benefits associated with tax treatment of dividends and distributions);

·perception by market professionals of REITs generally and REITs comparable to us in particular;

·level of institutional investor interest in our securities;

·relatively low trading volumes in securities of REITs;

19



·our results of operations and financial condition;

·investor confidence in the stock market generally; and

·additions and departures of key personnel.

The market value of our common shares is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.  Consequently, our common shares may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per common share.  If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our common shares will diminish.

Additional issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to shareholders.

The interests of our shareholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities to finance future developments or acquisitions or to repay indebtedness.  Our Board of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional equity securities without shareholder approval.  Our ability to execute our business strategy depends upon our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including the issuance of common and preferred equity.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue preferred shares with terms that may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for our shares or otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue up to 40,000,000 preferred shares, having those preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption as determined by our Board.  In addition, our Board may reclassify any unissued common shares into one or more classes or series of preferred shares.  Thus, our Board could authorize, without shareholder approval, the issuance of preferred shares with terms and conditions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some or a majority of our shares might receive a premium for their shares over the then-prevailing market price of our shares.  We currently do not expect that the Board would require shareholder approval prior to such a preferred issuance.  In addition,addi tion, any preferred shares that we issue would rank senior to our common shares with respect to the payment of distributions, in which case we could not pay any distributions on our common shares until full distributions have been paid with respect to such preferred shares.

 

The acquisition of new facilities that lack operating history with us will give riseRisks Related to difficulties in predicting revenue potential.

We will continue to acquire additional facilities.  These acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with expectations.  If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, operating costs or costs of improvements to bring an acquired facility up to the standards established for our intended market position, the performance of the facility may be below expectations.  Acquired facilities may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered.  We cannot assure you that the performance of facilities acquired by us will increase or be maintained under our management.Securities

 

Additional issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to shareholders.

The interests of our shareholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities to finance future acquisitions or developments or to repay indebtedness.  Our financial performance is dependentBoard of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional equity securities without shareholder approval.  Our ability to execute our business strategy depends upon the economicour access to an appropriate blend

20



Table of Contents

of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other conditionsforms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including the markets in which our facilities are located.

We are susceptible to adverse developments in the markets in which we operate, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocationsissuance of businesses, changing demographicscommon and other factors. Our facilities in Florida, California, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee, Illinois and Arizona accounted for approximately 16%, 16%, 10%, 8%, 7%, 6% and 5%, respectively, of our total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2007. As a result of this geographic concentration of our facilities, we are particularly susceptible to adverse market conditions in these areas. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, or in any of the other markets in which we operate, or any decrease in demand for self-storage space resulting from the local business climate could adversely affect our rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions to our shareholders.preferred equity.

 

Our business may be sensitive to economic conditions that impact consumer spending.Many factors could have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

 

20A number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control.  These factors include:



 

Our·increases in market interest rates, relative to the dividend yield on our shares.  If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of our securities may require a higher yield.  Higher market interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution.  Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common shares to go down;

·anticipated benefit of an investment in our securities as compared to investment in securities of companies in other industries (including benefits associated with tax treatment of dividends and distributions);

·perception by market professionals of REITs generally and REITs comparable to us in particular;

·level of institutional investor interest in our securities;

·relatively low trading volumes in securities of REITs;

·our results of operations and financial condition;

·investor confidence in the stock market generally; and

·additions and departures of key personnel.

The market value of our common shares is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.  Consequently, our common shares may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per common share.  If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our common shares will diminish.

The market price of our common shares has been, and may continue to be, particularly volatile, and our shareholders may be sensitiveunable to changesresell their shares at a profit.

The market price of our common shares has been subject to significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate or decline.  Between 2009 and December 31, 2010, our common stock has been particularly volatile as the price of our common stock has ranged from a high of $9.62 to a low of $1.50.  In the past several years, REIT stocks have experienced high levels of volatility and significant declines in overallvalue from their historic highs.  Additionally, as a result of the current global credit crisis and the concurrent economic conditionsdownturn in the U.S. and globally, there have been significant declines in the values of equity securities generally in the U.S. and abroad.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending.  Future economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energycompany.  If our stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other productsdivert our management’s attention and services.  A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affectresources from our growth and profitability.business.

 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

21



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

Overview

 

As of December 31, 2007,2010, we owned 409363 self-storage facilities located in 26 states and the District of Columbia; and aggregating approximately 26.123.6 million rentable square feet.  The following table sets forth certain summary information regarding our facilities by state as of December 31, 2007.2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

% of Total

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

Rentable

 

Rentable

 

Occupied

 

State

 

Facilities

 

Units

 

Square Feet

 

Square Feet

 

Square Feet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

California

 

60

 

37,018

 

4,133,441

 

15.8

%

69.7

%

Florida

 

59

 

39,973

 

4,173,724

 

16.0

%

80.2

%

Texas

 

43

 

21,003

 

2,627,795

 

10.1

%

81.1

%

Ohio

 

35

 

16,364

 

1,999,099

 

7.7

%

79.9

%

Illinois

 

27

 

14,020

 

1,610,610

 

6.2

%

79.9

%

Arizona

 

24

 

12,526

 

1,247,447

 

4.8

%

84.0

%

Tennessee

 

24

 

12,930

 

1,686,433

 

6.3

%

82.5

%

Colorado

 

20

 

10,389

 

1,200,834

 

4.6

%

87.9

%

Connecticut

 

17

 

7,255

 

845,781

 

3.2

%

76.5

%

New Jersey

 

15

 

10,266

 

1,003,586

 

3.8

%

75.0

%

Georgia

 

13

 

9,245

 

1,060,144

 

4.1

%

76.8

%

New Mexico

 

11

 

4,247

 

459,020

 

1.8

%

89.6

%

Indiana

 

9

 

5,302

 

599,457

 

2.3

%

80.4

%

North Carolina

 

8

 

4,810

 

557,459

 

2.1

%

86.5

%

Mississippi

 

6

 

2,824

 

353,431

 

1.4

%

82.5

%

New York

 

6

 

3,208

 

349,453

 

1.3

%

83.8

%

Louisiana

 

5

 

2,358

 

304,555

 

1.2

%

93.2

%

Maryland

 

5

 

4,232

 

517,895

 

2.0

%

86.5

%

Utah

 

5

 

2,336

 

241,823

 

0.9

%

93.8

%

Michigan

 

4

 

1,888

 

270,769

 

1.0

%

78.6

%

Alabama

 

3

 

1,632

 

237,583

 

0.9

%

81.5

%

Massachusetts

 

3

 

1,776

 

172,928

 

0.7

%

74.7

%

Nevada

 

2

 

940

 

99,882

 

0.4

%

83.0

%

Pennsylvania

 

2

 

1,609

 

176,577

 

0.7

%

79.0

%

Virginia

 

2

 

1,214

 

130,943

 

0.5

%

59.8

%

Wisconsin

 

1

 

486

 

58,515

 

0.2

%

84.1

%

Total/Weighted Average

 

409

 

229,851

 

26,119,184

 

100.0

%

79.5

%

21



 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

% of Total

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

Rentable

 

Rentable

 

 

 

State

 

Facilities

 

Units

 

Square Feet

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida

 

52

 

36,595

 

3,871,103

 

16.3

%

75.9

%

California

 

44

 

27,849

 

3,203,558

 

13.5

%

70.0

%

Texas

 

44

 

21,374

 

2,718,409

 

11.5

%

79.9

%

Ohio

 

33

 

15,336

 

1,873,017

 

7.8

%

75.9

%

Illinois

 

27

 

13,875

 

1,608,368

 

6.8

%

82.0

%

Tennessee

 

24

 

12,821

 

1,683,937

 

7.1

%

77.7

%

Arizona

 

24

 

11,569

 

1,246,379

 

5.3

%

80.7

%

Connecticut

 

17

 

7,091

 

847,311

 

3.6

%

78.0

%

New Jersey

 

16

 

10,366

 

1,039,610

 

4.4

%

67.5

%

Georgia

 

9

 

6,033

 

759,575

 

3.2

%

75.8

%

Indiana

 

9

 

5,157

 

592,790

 

2.5

%

73.3

%

New York

 

9

 

7,269

 

559,239

 

2.4

%

75.1

%

New Mexico

 

9

 

3,408

 

387,340

 

1.6

%

82.4

%

Colorado

 

8

 

4,061

 

492,344

 

2.1

%

83.9

%

North Carolina

 

6

 

3,859

 

462,998

 

2.0

%

74.0

%

Maryland

 

5

 

4,162

 

518,252

 

2.2

%

80.2

%

Virginia

 

4

 

2,517

 

273,267

 

1.2

%

72.3

%

Michigan

 

4

 

1,885

 

270,869

 

1.2

%

72.7

%

Utah

 

4

 

2,253

 

241,523

 

1.0

%

73.0

%

Massachusetts

 

4

 

2,378

 

207,326

 

0.9

%

65.3

%

Louisiana

 

3

 

1,415

 

195,017

 

0.8

%

80.1

%

Pennsylvania

 

2

 

1,615

 

173,819

 

0.7

%

83.2

%

Nevada

 

2

 

893

 

96,732

 

0.4

%

84.9

%

Alabama

 

1

 

797

 

128,999

 

0.6

%

73.5

%

Washington DC

 

1

 

752

 

63,085

 

0.3

%

89.9

%

Mississippi

 

1

 

507

 

61,251

 

0.3

%

80.9

%

Wisconsin

 

1

 

485

 

58,500

 

0.3

%

76.2

%

Total/Weighted Average

 

363

 

206,322

 

23,634,618

 

100.0

%

76.3

%

 

Our Facilities

 

The following table sets forth certain additional information with respect to each of our facilities as of December 31, 2007.2010. Our ownership of each facility consists of a fee interest in the facility held by U-Store-It, L.P., our operating partnership,Operating Partnership, or one of its subsidiaries, except for our Morris Township, NJ facility, where we havethat is subject to a ground lease.  In addition, small parcels of land at five of our other facilities are subject to ground leases.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Mobile I, AL

 

1997

 

1987

 

65,198

 

91.1

%

468

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mobile II, AL †

 

1997

 

1974/90

 

129,260

 

73.2

%

801

 

Y

 

1.1

%

Mobile III, AL

 

1998

 

1988/94

 

43,125

 

91.9

%

363

 

Y

 

34.5

%

Chandler, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

47,520

 

93.8

%

466

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Glendale, AZ

 

1998

 

1987

 

56,830

 

81.3

%

554

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Green Valley, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

25,200

 

67.8

%

277

 

N

 

7.9

%

Mesa I, AZ

 

2006

 

1985

 

52,375

 

91.1

%

535

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mesa II, AZ

 

2006

 

1981

 

45,295

 

85.4

%

420

 

Y

 

8.4

%

Mesa III, AZ

 

2006

 

1986

 

58,264

 

78.3

%

514

 

Y

 

4.1

%

Phoenix I, AZ

 

2006

 

1987

 

100,887

 

76.5

%

822

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Phoenix II, AZ

 

2006

 

1974

 

45,270

 

75.8

%

440

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1998

 

1995

 

80,925

 

90.3

%

692

 

Y

 

9.5

%

Tempe, AZ

 

2005

 

1975

 

54,000

 

84.1

%

410

 

Y

 

14.0

%

Tucson I, AZ

 

1998

 

1974

 

59,350

 

87.7

%

505

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson II, AZ

 

1998

 

1988

 

43,950

 

84.7

%

543

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Tucson III, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

49,822

 

78.2

%

535

 

N

 

0.0

%

Tucson IV, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

47,840

 

88.5

%

524

 

Y

 

3.7

%

Tucson IX, AZ

 

2005

 

1984

 

67,656

 

81.7

%

653

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson V, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

45,160

 

82.8

%

452

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Tucson VI, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

40,778

 

89.3

%

451

 

Y

 

3.5

%

Tucson VII, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

52,738

 

85.4

%

637

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

46,800

 

83.9

%

504

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson X, AZ

 

2005

 

1981

 

46,350

 

84.6

%

491

 

N

 

0.0

%

Tucson XI, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,800

 

82.0

%

465

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,375

 

87.7

%

474

 

Y

 

4.8

%

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

45,792

 

90.0

%

583

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

2005

 

1976

 

49,470

 

84.0

%

579

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Apple Valley I, CA

 

1997

 

1984

 

73,340

 

48.3

%

594

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Apple Valley II, CA

 

1997

 

1988

 

62,115

 

62.9

%

495

 

Y

 

7.0

%

Benicia, CA

 

2005

 

1988/93/05

 

74,920

 

82.9

%

762

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bloomington I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

28,550

 

65.8

%

218

 

N

 

0.0

%

Bloomington II, CA †

 

1997

 

1987

 

25,860

 

97.1

%

20

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cathedral City, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/92

 

129,048

 

54.3

%

1029

 

Y

 

1.9

%

Citrus Heights, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

75,620

 

62.0

%

693

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Diamond Bar, CA

 

2005

 

1988

 

103,228

 

81.7

%

918

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Escondido, CA

 

2007

 

2002

 

143,145

 

77.2

%

1296

 

Y

 

6.7

%

Fallbrook, CA

 

1997

 

1985/88

 

46,370

 

82.8

%

461

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Hemet, CA

 

1997

 

1989

 

66,040

 

76.1

%

445

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Highland I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

76,765

 

58.0

%

860

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Highland II, CA

 

2006

 

1982

 

62,257

 

70.1

%

536

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lancaster, CA

 

2001

 

1987

 

61,275

 

53.1

%

414

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Long Beach, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

125,213

 

76.5

%

1424

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murrieta, CA

 

2005

 

1996

 

49,895

 

68.0

%

474

 

Y

 

3.3

%

North Highlands, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

57,244

 

89.6

%

481

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Orangevale, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

50,492

 

79.4

%

556

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Palm Springs I, CA

 

2006

 

1989

 

72,775

 

68.0

%

582

 

Y

 

8.6

%

Palm Springs II, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/89

 

122,745

 

57.8

%

634

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Pleasanton, CA

 

2005

 

2003

 

82,415

 

86.0

%

718

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

53,928

 

79.0

%

484

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Redlands, CA

 

1997

 

1985

 

62,805

 

80.0

%

548

 

N

 

0.0

%

Rialto, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

57,371

 

64.5

%

519

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rialto II, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

99,393

 

67.2

%

779

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Riverside I, CA

 

1997

 

1989

 

27,485

 

76.4

%

238

 

N

 

0.0

%

Riverside II, CA †

 

1997

 

1989

 

20,420

 

91.6

%

18

 

N

 

0.0

%

Riverside III, CA

 

1998

 

1989

 

46,809

 

70.9

%

442

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Riverside IV, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

67,320

 

60.5

%

715

 

Y

 

4.0

%

Riverside V, CA

 

2006

 

1985

 

85,521

 

58.1

%

834

 

Y

 

12.7

%

Riverside VI, CA

 

2007

 

2004

 

74,900

 

67.6

%

466

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Roseville, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

59,944

 

87.6

%

582

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento I, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

50,764

 

88.0

%

536

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento II, CA

 

2005

 

1986

 

61,890

 

72.8

%

583

 

Y

 

4.7

%

San Bernardino I, CA

 

1997

 

1985

 

47,350

 

63.2

%

460

 

Y

 

2.0

%

San Bernardino II, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

83,278

 

60.5

%

609

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino III, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

31,070

 

74.8

%

259

 

N

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

1997

 

1989

 

57,245

 

68.7

%

597

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

2006

 

1975

 

117,928

 

44.8

%

1076

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino V, CA

 

1997

 

1991

 

41,646

 

72.7

%

406

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino VI, CA

 

1997

 

1985/92

 

35,671

 

76.0

%

405

 

N

 

11.8

%

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

83,507

 

77.9

%

776

 

Y

 

4.2

%

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

56,820

 

56.9

%

507

 

Y

 

1.3

%

San Bernardino X, CA

 

2006

 

1978

 

78,839

 

66.1

%

669

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino XI, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

112,154

 

58.0

%

1037

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Marcos, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

37,430

 

91.8

%

247

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Mobile, AL †

 

1997

 

1974/90

 

128,999

 

73.5

%

797

 

Y

 

1.4

%

Chandler, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

47,520

 

77.4

%

437

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Glendale, AZ

 

1998

 

1987

 

56,850

 

78.6

%

517

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Green Valley, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

25,100

 

62.2

%

253

 

N

 

8.2

%

Mesa I, AZ

 

2006

 

1985

 

52,375

 

85.9

%

482

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mesa II, AZ

 

2006

 

1981

 

45,445

 

87.3

%

383

 

Y

 

8.4

%

Mesa III, AZ

 

2006

 

1986

 

58,264

 

75.1

%

489

 

Y

 

4.5

%

Phoenix I, AZ

 

2006

 

1987

 

100,762

 

76.4

%

756

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Phoenix II, AZ

 

2006

 

1974

 

45,270

 

89.0

%

402

 

Y

 

4.7

%

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1998

 

1995

 

80,425

 

83.2

%

657

 

Y

 

9.6

%

Tempe, AZ

 

2005

 

1975

 

53,890

 

77.8

%

403

 

Y

 

13.0

%

Tucson I, AZ

 

1998

 

1974

 

59,350

 

82.2

%

483

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson II, AZ

 

1998

 

1988

 

43,950

 

82.7

%

528

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Tucson III, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

49,822

 

84.6

%

481

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson IV, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

48,008

 

78.5

%

494

 

Y

 

3.6

%

Tucson V, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

45,234

 

75.8

%

416

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Tucson VI, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

40,766

 

81.5

%

408

 

Y

 

3.4

%

Tucson VII, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

52,688

 

86.4

%

595

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

46,650

 

84.4

%

445

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson IX, AZ

 

2005

 

1984

 

67,648

 

74.1

%

604

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson X, AZ

 

2005

 

1981

 

46,350

 

73.0

%

421

 

N

 

0.0

%

Tucson XI, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,800

 

84.1

%

423

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,325

 

86.9

%

435

 

Y

 

4.8

%

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

45,792

 

80.4

%

509

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

2005

 

1976

 

49,095

 

88.4

%

548

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Apple Valley I, CA

 

1997

 

1984

 

73,440

 

59.3

%

527

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Apple Valley II, CA

 

1997

 

1988

 

61,555

 

75.1

%

458

 

Y

 

5.3

%

Benecia, CA

 

2005

 

1988/93/05

 

74,770

 

85.8

%

736

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Cathedral City, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/92

 

109,340

 

59.2

%

708

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Citrus Heights, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

75,620

 

70.8

%

659

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Diamond Bar, CA

 

2005

 

1988

 

103,034

 

75.0

%

898

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Escondido, CA

 

2007

 

2002

 

142,870

 

80.0

%

1,228

 

Y

 

6.5

%

Fallbrook, CA

 

1997

 

1985/88

 

46,620

 

87.5

%

449

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lancaster, CA

 

2001

 

1987

 

60,625

 

53.8

%

367

 

N

 

0.0

%

Long Beach, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

125,163

 

62.0

%

1,351

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murrieta, CA

 

2005

 

1996

 

49,815

 

83.5

%

421

 

Y

 

2.9

%

North Highlands, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

57,244

 

85.7

%

469

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Orangevale, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

50,392

 

75.1

%

525

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Palm Springs I, CA

 

2006

 

1989

 

72,675

 

62.0

%

572

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Palm Springs II, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/89

 

122,370

 

54.9

%

627

 

Y

 

8.5

%

Pleasanton, CA

 

2005

 

2003

 

85,055

 

88.0

%

692

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

54,128

 

73.0

%

454

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rialto I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

57,411

 

59.7

%

505

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rialto II, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

99,783

 

72.0

%

749

 

N

 

0.0

%

Riverside I, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

67,170

 

80.6

%

641

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Riverside II, CA

 

2006

 

1985

 

85,196

 

50.9

%

828

 

Y

 

3.9

%

Roseville, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

59,869

 

78.2

%

549

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento I, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

51,114

 

77.9

%

540

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento II, CA

 

2005

 

1986

 

61,856

 

61.7

%

551

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

31,070

 

61.4

%

250

 

N

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino II, CA

 

1997

 

1991

 

41,546

 

69.3

%

375

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

1997

 

1985/92

 

35,671

 

73.0

%

398

 

N

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino V, CA

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

83,507

 

61.6

%

733

 

Y

 

11.8

%

San Bernardino VI, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

57,145

 

52.8

%

501

 

Y

 

4.2

%

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

2006

 

1975

 

103,860

 

55.8

%

951

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

2006

 

1978

 

78,729

 

82.0

%

623

 

Y

 

1.3

%

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

95,129

 

52.5

%

890

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Marcos, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

37,430

 

76.4

%

244

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Santa Ana, CA

 

2006

 

1984

 

63,571

 

81.4

%

714

 

Y

 

2.4

%

South Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

51,940

 

68.0

%

412

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Spring Valley, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

55,045

 

79.5

%

714

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Temecula I, CA

 

1998

 

1985/2003

 

81,700

 

65.7

%

684

 

Y

 

46.4

%

Temecula II, CA

 

2006

 

2003

 

84,398

 

80.3

%

627

 

Y

 

51.3

%

Thousand Palms, CA

 

2006

 

1988/01

 

75,445

 

57.8

%

766

 

Y

 

27.1

%

Vista I, CA

 

2001

 

1988

 

74,405

 

83.9

%

615

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Vista II, CA

 

2005

 

2001/02/03

 

147,281

 

74.7

%

1,270

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Walnut, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

50,708

 

72.5

%

536

 

Y

 

9.2

%

West Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1984

 

39,715

 

78.1

%

484

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westminster, CA

 

2005

 

1983/98

 

68,148

 

75.2

%

558

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora, CO

 

2005

 

1981

 

75,827

 

80.9

%

603

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

2005

 

1986

 

47,975

 

92.0

%

455

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

2006

 

2001

 

62,400

 

92.9

%

425

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Denver, CO

 

2006

 

1997

 

59,200

 

83.2

%

451

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

23



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Santa Ana, CA

 

2006

 

1984

 

65,528

 

72.5

%

742

 

Y

 

2.4

%

South Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

52,290

 

60.5

%

434

 

Y

 

0.0

%

South Palmetto, CA

 

1998

 

1982

 

80,505

 

70.1

%

820

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Spring Valley, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

55,070

 

57.9

%

718

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sun City, CA

 

1998

 

1989

 

38,435

 

70.1

%

383

 

N

 

0.0

%

Temecula I, CA

 

1998

 

1985/2003

 

81,740

 

80.0

%

716

 

Y

 

46.4

%

Temecula II, CA

 

2006

 

2003

 

84,580

 

42.0

%

723

 

Y

 

51.3

%

Thousand Palms, CA

 

2006

 

1988/01

 

76,336

 

52.0

%

896

 

Y

 

60.7

%

Vista I, CA

 

2001

 

1988

 

74,405

 

90.4

%

621

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Vista II, CA

 

2005

 

2001/02/03

 

147,721

 

78.4

%

1293

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Walnut, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

50,708

 

85.6

%

539

 

Y

 

9.2

%

West Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1984

 

39,715

 

88.2

%

488

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westminster, CA

 

2005

 

1983/98

 

68,048

 

93.2

%

572

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Yucaipa, CA

 

1997

 

1989

 

77,560

 

69.4

%

671

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora I, CO

 

2005

 

1981

 

75,867

 

81.5

%

623

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora II, CO

 

2005

 

1984

 

57,753

 

89.6

%

475

 

Y

 

5.3

%

Aurora III, CO

 

2005

 

1977

 

28,730

 

91.4

%

311

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora IV, CO

 

2006

 

1998/99

 

49,700

 

87.3

%

352

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Avon, CO

 

2005

 

1989

 

28,227

 

91.5

%

387

 

Y

 

22.7

%

Boulder I, CO

 

2006

 

1972/75/77

 

47,296

 

88.8

%

531

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Boulder II, CO

 

2006

 

1983/84

 

101,245

 

90.9

%

1093

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Boulder III, CO

 

2006

 

1974/78

 

80,174

 

82.9

%

781

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Boulder IV, CO

 

2006

 

1983/98

 

95,148

 

94.0

%

715

 

Y

 

7.1

%

Colorado Springs, CO

 

2005

 

1986

 

47,975

 

87.3

%

474

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

2006

 

2001

 

62,400

 

91.5

%

433

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Denver I, CO

 

2005

 

1987

 

58,050

 

79.1

%

431

 

Y

 

4.4

%

Denver II, CO

 

2006

 

1997

 

59,200

 

86.7

%

451

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Denver III, CO

 

2006

 

1999

 

63,700

 

81.9

%

454

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Englewood, CO

 

2005

 

1981

 

51,000

 

87.9

%

366

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Federal Heights, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

54,770

 

88.2

%

554

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Golden, CO

 

2005

 

1985

 

87,832

 

90.7

%

645

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Littleton I , CO

 

2005

 

1987

 

53,490

 

89.0

%

452

 

Y

 

37.4

%

Littleton II, CO

 

2005

 

1982

 

46,175

 

90.4

%

363

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Northglenn, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

52,102

 

87.4

%

498

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bloomfield, CT

 

1997

 

1987/93/94

 

48,700

 

63.9

%

450

 

Y

 

6.6

%

Branford, CT

 

1995

 

1986

 

49,079

 

91.3

%

433

 

Y

 

2.2

%

Bristol, CT

 

2005

 

1989/99

 

47,825

 

83.4

%

479

 

N

 

22.6

%

East Windsor, CT

 

2005

 

1986/89

 

45,900

 

68.7

%

309

 

N

 

0.0

%

Enfield, CT

 

2001

 

1989

 

52,775

 

84.5

%

381

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Gales Ferry, CT

 

1995

 

1987/89

 

54,230

 

70.6

%

599

 

N

 

7.5

%

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

2002

 

1999/00/01

 

47,125

 

65.1

%

491

 

N

 

37.6

%

Manchester II, CT

 

2005

 

1984

 

52,725

 

72.5

%

411

 

N

 

0.0

%

Milford, CT

 

1994

 

1975

 

44,885

 

76.0

%

384

 

Y

 

4.0

%

Monroe, CT

 

2005

 

1996/03

 

58,500

 

87.7

%

405

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mystic, CT

 

1994

 

1975/86

 

50,800

 

67.0

%

538

 

Y

 

2.4

%

Newington I, CT †

 

2005

 

1978/97

 

42,620

 

75.1

%

258

 

N

 

0.0

%

Newington II, CT

 

2005

 

1979/81

 

35,810

 

88.1

%

213

 

N

 

0.0

%

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

2005

 

1982/88/00

 

87,700

 

76.5

%

723

 

N

 

6.3

%

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

2005

 

1988/02

 

26,425

 

84.4

%

257

 

N

 

55.3

%

South Windsor, CT

 

1994

 

1976

 

71,725

 

66.4

%

557

 

Y

 

1.1

%

Stamford, CT

 

2005

 

1997

 

28,957

 

95.1

%

367

 

N

 

32.8

%

Boca Raton, FL

 

2001

 

1998

 

37,958

 

90.9

%

605

 

N

 

68.2

%

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

62,013

 

87.4

%

812

 

Y

 

54.2

%

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

2005

 

2001

 

61,841

 

79.2

%

601

 

Y

 

81.3

%

Bradenton I, FL

 

2004

 

1979

 

68,502

 

53.8

%

659

 

N

 

2.8

%

Bradenton II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

87,760

 

80.4

%

881

 

Y

 

40.0

%

Cape Coral, FL

 

2000*

 

2000

 

76,592

 

83.8

%

883

 

Y

 

83.5

%

Dania, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

58,270

 

98.4

%

498

 

Y

 

26.9

%

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

2004

 

1984

 

183,393

 

82.5

%

2011

 

N

 

20.7

%

Davie, FL

 

2001*

 

2001

 

81,035

 

85.9

%

853

 

Y

 

55.7

%

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

1998*

 

1998

 

57,600

 

80.6

%

526

 

Y

 

39.2

%

DeLand, FL

 

1998

 

1987

 

37,552

 

87.1

%

401

 

Y

 

34.5

%

Delray Beach, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

67,809

 

90.6

%

821

 

Y

 

39.3

%

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

1996

 

1986

 

111,030

 

74.7

%

897

 

Y

 

35.7

%

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

1999

 

1999

 

70,596

 

90.9

%

703

 

Y

 

46.5

%

Ft. Myers, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

67,546

 

78.3

%

610

 

Y

 

67.0

%

Gulf Breeze, FL

 

2005

 

1982/04

 

79,449

 

91.8

%

700

 

N

 

62.7

%

Jacksonville I, FL

 

2005

 

2005

 

80,401

 

60.1

%

753

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

65,020

 

86.0

%

688

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville III, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

65,603

 

82.5

%

723

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

2007

 

2006

 

78,604

 

33.9

%

756

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville V, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

81,860

 

73.1

%

753

 

N

 

82.3

%

Kendall, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

75,395

 

84.7

%

710

 

N

 

71.0

%

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

54,770

 

84.8

%

559

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Golden, CO

 

2005

 

1985

 

86,580

 

81.6

%

623

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Littleton I , CO

 

2005

 

1987

 

53,490

 

80.8

%

447

 

Y

 

37.4

%

Northglenn, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

52,102

 

77.2

%

498

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bloomfield, CT

 

1997

 

1987/93/94

 

48,700

 

71.6

%

436

 

Y

 

6.6

%

Branford, CT

 

1995

 

1986

 

50,679

 

75.9

%

431

 

Y

 

2.2

%

Bristol, CT

 

2005

 

1989/99

 

47,950

 

82.2

%

443

 

N

 

22.4

%

East Windsor, CT

 

2005

 

1986/89

 

45,800

 

78.8

%

298

 

N

 

0.0

%

Enfield, CT

 

2001

 

1989

 

52,875

 

87.9

%

369

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Gales Ferry, CT

 

1995

 

1987/89

 

54,230

 

70.9

%

597

 

N

 

6.5

%

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

2002

 

1999/00/01

 

47,125

 

76.0

%

459

 

N

 

37.6

%

Manchester II, CT

 

2005

 

1984

 

52,725

 

72.4

%

394

 

N

 

0.0

%

Milford, CT

 

1994

 

1975

 

44,885

 

82.4

%

376

 

N

 

4.0

%

Monroe, CT

 

2005

 

1996/03

 

58,500

 

71.5

%

394

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mystic, CT

 

1994

 

1975/86

 

50,725

 

82.9

%

560

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Newington I, CT

 

2005

 

1978/97

 

42,520

 

68.4

%

247

 

N

 

0.0

%

Newington II, CT

 

2005

 

1979/81

 

36,140

 

89.0

%

197

 

N

 

0.0

%

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

2005

 

1982/88/00

 

86,950

 

86.1

%

716

 

N

 

5.9

%

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

2005

 

1988/02

 

26,425

 

85.1

%

254

 

N

 

54.2

%

South Windsor, CT

 

1994

 

1976

 

72,125

 

68.3

%

553

 

Y

 

1.1

%

Stamford, CT

 

2005

 

1997

 

28,957

 

84.8

%

367

 

N

 

32.8

%

Washington, DC

 

2008

 

2002

 

63,085

 

89.9

%

752

 

Y

 

96.5

%

Boca Raton, FL

 

2001

 

1998

 

37,958

 

81.2

%

605

 

N

 

68.2

%

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

61,977

 

81.4

%

763

 

Y

 

54.2

%

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

2005

 

2001

 

61,727

 

66.9

%

580

 

Y

 

82.3

%

Bradenton I, FL

 

2004

 

1979

 

68,391

 

63.9

%

635

 

N

 

2.7

%

Bradenton II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

87,815

 

81.3

%

854

 

Y

 

40.1

%

Cape Coral, FL

 

2000*

 

2000

 

76,567

 

75.6

%

865

 

Y

 

83.5

%

Dania, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

58,270

 

69.9

%

497

 

Y

 

26.9

%

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

2004

 

1984

 

181,463

 

64.8

%

1,969

 

N

 

20.4

%

Davie, FL

 

2001*

 

2001

 

81,135

 

81.3

%

843

 

Y

 

55.6

%

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

1998*

 

1998

 

57,280

 

84.6

%

517

 

Y

 

38.8

%

Delray Beach, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

67,821

 

72.6

%

832

 

Y

 

39.3

%

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

1996

 

1986

 

110,785

 

74.9

%

828

 

Y

 

35.7

%

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

1999

 

1999

 

70,093

 

88.0

%

694

 

Y

 

46.8

%

Ft. Myers, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

67,558

 

60.3

%

592

 

Y

 

67.2

%

Jacksonville I, FL

 

2005

 

2005

 

80,376

 

86.8

%

716

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

65,070

 

91.4

%

650

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville III, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

65,575

 

93.7

%

683

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

2007

 

2006

 

77,515

 

78.7

%

701

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville V, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

82,165

 

80.4

%

702

 

N

 

82.4

%

Kendall, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

75,395

 

85.1

%

703

 

N

 

71.0

%

Lake Worth, FL †

 

1998

 

1998/02

 

161,808

 

89.6

%

1,367

 

Y

 

37.2

%

Lakeland, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

49,095

 

79.3

%

491

 

Y

 

79.4

%

Lutz I, FL

 

2004

 

2000

 

66,895

 

70.6

%

614

 

Y

 

37.0

%

Lutz II, FL

 

2004

 

1999

 

69,232

 

78.3

%

538

 

Y

 

20.6

%

Margate I, FL †

 

1994

 

1979/81

 

54,505

 

78.4

%

339

 

N

 

10.0

%

Margate II, FL †

 

1996

 

1985

 

65,186

 

78.2

%

425

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Merrit Island, FL

 

2000

 

2000

 

50,417

 

78.7

%

465

 

Y

 

56.7

%

Miami I, FL

 

1995

 

1995

 

46,825

 

83.9

%

560

 

Y

 

52.1

%

Miami II, FL

 

1994

 

1989

 

67,060

 

71.3

%

568

 

Y

 

8.0

%

Miami IV, FL

 

2005

 

1988/03

 

150,590

 

71.3

%

1,523

 

N

 

86.9

%

Naples I, FL

 

1996

 

1996

 

48,150

 

95.1

%

328

 

Y

 

26.6

%

Naples II, FL

 

1997

 

1985

 

65,850

 

83.1

%

637

 

Y

 

44.6

%

Naples III, FL

 

1997

 

1981/83

 

80,627

 

68.4

%

818

 

Y

 

23.8

%

Naples IV, FL

 

1998

 

1990

 

40,475

 

75.3

%

435

 

N

 

43.3

%

Ocoee, FL

 

2005

 

1997

 

76,130

 

80.1

%

627

 

Y

 

15.5

%

Orange City, FL

 

2004

 

2001

 

59,586

 

80.2

%

648

 

N

 

39.1

%

Orlando I, FL (6)

 

1997

 

1987

 

52,170

 

62.0

%

497

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Orlando II, FL

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

63,084

 

87.0

%

580

 

N

 

74.2

%

Orlando III, FL

 

2006

 

1988/90/96

 

104,140

 

65.6

%

791

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Orlando IV, FL

 

2010

 

2009

 

76,615

 

44.8

%

645

 

N

 

64.4

%

Oviedo, FL

 

2006

 

1988/1991

 

49,251

 

70.6

%

426

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1997

 

1997

 

67,321

 

81.6

%

697

 

Y

 

63.2

%

Royal Palm Beach I, FL †

 

1994

 

1988

 

98,961

 

61.1

%

675

 

N

 

54.5

%

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

81,415

 

69.5

%

767

 

N

 

82.3

%

Sanford, FL

 

2006

 

1988/2006

 

61,810

 

72.3

%

440

 

Y

 

28.6

%

Sarasota, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

71,102

 

65.2

%

525

 

Y

 

42.5

%

St. Augustine, FL

 

1996

 

1985

 

59,725

 

71.9

%

698

 

Y

 

29.9

%

Stuart, FL

 

1997

 

1995

 

86,883

 

64.4

%

978

 

Y

 

51.7

%

SW Ranches, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

64,955

 

81.8

%

648

 

N

 

85.3

%

Tampa, FL

 

2007

 

2001/2002

 

83,738

 

83.6

%

796

 

N

 

28.5

%

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1997

 

68,063

 

79.0

%

984

 

Y

 

47.2

%

 

24



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Lake Worth, FL †

 

1998

 

1998/02

 

163,683

 

82.0

%

1408

 

Y

 

36.4

%

Lakeland I, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

48,911

 

82.2

%

484

 

Y

 

79.6

%

Lakeland II, FL

 

1996

 

1984

 

47,680

 

81.1

%

351

 

Y

 

19.0

%

Leesburg, FL

 

1997

 

1988

 

59,840

 

82.4

%

484

 

Y

 

17.7

%

Lutz I, FL

 

2004

 

2000

 

72,495

 

49.7

%

633

 

Y

 

34.1

%

Lutz II, FL

 

2004

 

1999

 

69,292

 

70.3

%

536

 

Y

 

20.6

%

Margate I, FL †

 

1994

 

1979/81

 

54,405

 

87.5

%

339

 

N

 

9.8

%

Margate II, FL †

 

1996

 

1985

 

65,168

 

87.3

%

437

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Merrit Island, FL

 

2000

 

2000

 

50,427

 

86.8

%

465

 

Y

 

56.8

%

Miami I, FL

 

1995

 

1995

 

46,925

 

89.7

%

565

 

Y

 

52.2

%

Miami II, FL

 

1994

 

1987

 

57,040

 

73.0

%

612

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Miami III, FL

 

1994

 

1989

 

67,060

 

85.2

%

571

 

Y

 

8.0

%

Miami IV, FL

 

1995

 

1987

 

58,315

 

86.1

%

614

 

Y

 

7.3

%

Miami V, FL

 

1995

 

1976

 

78,465

 

79.2

%

344

 

Y

 

4.0

%

Miami VI, FL

 

2005

 

1988/03

 

150,510

 

70.8

%

1518

 

N

 

86.8

%

Naples I, FL

 

1996

 

1996

 

48,050

 

81.1

%

351

 

Y

 

26.6

%

Naples II, FL

 

1997

 

1985

 

65,850

 

81.1

%

671

 

Y

 

44.6

%

Naples III, FL

 

1997

 

1981/83

 

81,145

 

67.2

%

876

 

Y

 

24.3

%

Naples IV, FL

 

1998

 

1990

 

40,975

 

67.8

%

458

 

N

 

43.4

%

Ocala, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

41,891

 

86.5

%

375

 

Y

 

9.8

%

Ocoee, FL

 

2005

 

1997

 

76,250

 

87.7

%

652

 

Y

 

15.5

%

Orange City, FL

 

2004

 

2001

 

59,636

 

80.5

%

669

 

N

 

39.2

%

Orlando I, FL (6)

 

1997

 

1987

 

52,170

 

84.9

%

515

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Orlando II, FL

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

62,864

 

89.9

%

592

 

N

 

74.1

%

Orlando III, FL

 

2006

 

1988/90/96

 

104,165

 

77.3

%

796

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Oviedo, FL

 

2006

 

1988/1991

 

49,256

 

80.2

%

444

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1997

 

1997

 

67,337

 

88.8

%

718

 

Y

 

63.2

%

Royal Palm Beach I, FL †

 

1994

 

1988

 

98,961

 

67.7

%

692

 

Y

 

54.5

%

Royal Palm Beach II, FL †

 

2007

 

2004

 

81,515

 

73.5

%

817

 

N

 

82.3

%

Sanford, FL

 

2006

 

1988/2006

 

61,810

 

90.4

%

452

 

Y

 

28.6

%

Sarasota, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

70,788

 

76.0

%

554

 

Y

 

42.3

%

St. Augustine, FL

 

1996

 

1985

 

59,670

 

78.7

%

734

 

Y

 

29.9

%

Stuart I, FL

 

1997

 

1986

 

41,324

 

78.7

%

542

 

Y

 

26.9

%

Stuart II, FL

 

1997

 

1995

 

86,924

 

77.8

%

1007

 

Y

 

51.4

%

SW Ranches, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

64,955

 

80.1

%

650

 

N

 

85.3

%

Tampa I, FL

 

1994

 

1987

 

60,700

 

86.6

%

421

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tampa II, FL

 

2001

 

1985

 

55,997

 

84.1

%

480

 

Y

 

17.1

%

Tampa III, FL

 

2007

 

2001/2002

 

83,788

 

77.7

%

807

 

N

 

28.4

%

Vero Beach, FL

 

1997

 

1986/1987

 

50,390

 

75.6

%

513

 

N

 

23.7

%

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1997

 

67,973

 

84.0

%

1025

 

Y

 

47.2

%

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

93,764

 

89.4

%

890

 

Y

 

74.4

%

Alpharetta, GA

 

2001

 

1996

 

90,485

 

76.5

%

678

 

Y

 

75.1

%

Austell , GA

 

2006

 

2000

 

83,615

 

74.2

%

676

 

Y

 

65.9

%

Decatur, GA

 

1998

 

1986

 

148,480

 

82.9

%

1356

 

Y

 

3.1

%

Norcross, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

85,390

 

80.8

%

607

 

Y

 

55.3

%

Peachtree City, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

49,845

 

83.5

%

453

 

N

 

75.6

%

Smyrna, GA

 

2001

 

2000

 

56,820

 

94.9

%

507

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Snellville, GA

 

2007

 

1996/1997

 

79,950

 

89.9

%

772

 

Y

 

27.1

%

Suwanee I, GA

 

2007

 

2000/2003

 

85,450

 

82.8

%

633

 

Y

 

28.6

%

Suwanee II, GA

 

2007

 

2005

 

79,640

 

62.8

%

630

 

N

 

60.8

%

Addison, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

31,275

 

82.4

%

370

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora, IL

 

2004

 

1996

 

73,845

 

67.7

%

563

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Bartlett, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

51,525

 

81.6

%

414

 

Y

 

33.6

%

Bellwood, IL

 

2001

 

1999

 

86,575

 

83.3

%

747

 

Y

 

52.2

%

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

2004

 

1978

 

74,600

 

79.4

%

644

 

N

 

0.0

%

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

64,304

 

87.8

%

648

 

Y

 

5.6

%

Glenview, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

100,115

 

84.5

%

743

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Gurnee, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

80,300

 

78.3

%

728

 

Y

 

34.1

%

Hanover, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

41,174

 

92.7

%

419

 

Y

 

0.4

%

Harvey, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

60,315

 

90.0

%

584

 

Y

 

2.9

%

Joliet, IL

 

2004

 

1993

 

74,350

 

52.6

%

480

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Kildeer, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

46,475

 

85.8

%

429

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lombard, IL

 

2004

 

1981

 

57,736

 

88.6

%

547

 

Y

 

9.9

%

Mount Prospect, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

65,000

 

81.3

%

603

 

Y

 

12.7

%

Mundelein, IL

 

2004

 

1990

 

44,700

 

80.1

%

493

 

Y

 

8.9

%

North Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1985

 

53,300

 

83.5

%

435

 

N

 

0.0

%

Plainfield I, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

53,900

 

80.2

%

403

 

N

 

3.3

%

Plainfield II, IL

 

2005

 

2000

 

52,100

 

64.2

%

357

 

N

 

22.7

%

Schaumburg, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

31,235

 

83.5

%

323

 

N

 

5.6

%

Streamwood, IL

 

2004

 

1982

 

64,305

 

74.9

%

572

 

N

 

4.4

%

Warrensville, IL

 

2005

 

1977/89

 

48,796

 

84.6

%

385

 

N

 

0.0

%

Waukegan, IL

 

2004

 

1977

 

79,750

 

77.7

%

703

 

Y

 

8.4

%

West Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

48,475

 

80.6

%

435

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

94,503

 

84.8

%

836

 

Y

 

73.9

%

Alpharetta, GA

 

2001

 

1996

 

90,485

 

77.5

%

665

 

Y

 

75.1

%

Austell , GA

 

2006

 

2000

 

83,625

 

70.8

%

644

 

Y

 

66.0

%

Decatur, GA

 

1998

 

1986

 

148,480

 

72.9

%

1,281

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Norcross, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

85,410

 

77.1

%

573

 

Y

 

55.8

%

Peachtree City, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

49,875

 

86.7

%

438

 

N

 

75.6

%

Smyrna, GA

 

2001

 

2000

 

56,820

 

82.1

%

488

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Snellville, GA

 

2007

 

1996/1997

 

80,000

 

85.3

%

755

 

Y

 

27.1

%

Suwanee I, GA

 

2007

 

2000/2003

 

85,240

 

68.5

%

616

 

Y

 

28.7

%

Suwanee II, GA

 

2007

 

2005

 

79,640

 

69.9

%

573

 

N

 

61.8

%

Addison, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

31,325

 

88.9

%

367

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora, IL

 

2004

 

1996

 

74,435

 

75.8

%

554

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Bartlett, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

51,425

 

83.2

%

411

 

Y

 

33.5

%

Bellwood, IL

 

2001

 

1999

 

86,650

 

83.6

%

742

 

Y

 

52.1

%

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

2004

 

1978

 

74,400

 

89.1

%

637

 

N

 

0.0

%

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

64,129

 

88.0

%

626

 

Y

 

5.5

%

Glenview, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

100,115

 

95.0

%

738

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Gurnee, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

80,300

 

78.7

%

722

 

N

 

34.1

%

Hanover, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

41,178

 

76.0

%

408

 

Y

 

0.4

%

Harvey, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

60,090

 

84.2

%

575

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Joliet, IL

 

2004

 

1993

 

73,175

 

72.0

%

528

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Kildeer, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

46,275

 

89.0

%

429

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lombard, IL

 

2004

 

1981

 

58,188

 

85.3

%

548

 

Y

 

9.8

%

Mount Prospect, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

65,000

 

88.2

%

587

 

Y

 

12.7

%

Mundelein, IL

 

2004

 

1990

 

44,700

 

79.6

%

490

 

Y

 

8.9

%

North Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1985

 

53,350

 

74.2

%

428

 

N

 

0.0

%

Plainfield I, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

53,800

 

88.7

%

401

 

N

 

3.3

%

Plainfield II, IL

 

2005

 

2000

 

51,900

 

72.3

%

353

 

N

 

22.8

%

Schaumburg, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

31,160

 

88.3

%

321

 

N

 

5.6

%

Streamwood, IL

 

2004

 

1982

 

64,305

 

73.9

%

567

 

N

 

4.4

%

Warrensville, IL

 

2005

 

1977/89

 

48,796

 

77.6

%

378

 

N

 

0.0

%

Waukegan, IL

 

2004

 

1977

 

79,500

 

79.1

%

691

 

Y

 

8.4

%

West Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

48,175

 

83.5

%

426

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westmont, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

53,700

 

90.6

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Wheeling I, IL

 

2004

 

1974

 

54,210

 

81.6

%

493

 

N

 

0.0

%

Wheeling II, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

67,825

 

68.7

%

603

 

Y

 

7.3

%

Woodridge, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

50,262

 

79.9

%

466

 

Y

 

6.7

%

Indianapolis I, IN

 

2004

 

1987

 

43,600

 

76.9

%

326

 

N

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis II, IN

 

2004

 

1997

 

44,900

 

75.9

%

454

 

Y

 

15.6

%

Indianapolis III, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

60,850

 

77.8

%

496

 

Y

 

32.8

%

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

62,105

 

68.6

%

526

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis V, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

74,825

 

88.7

%

584

 

Y

 

33.6

%

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

73,003

 

68.7

%

717

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

2004

 

1992

 

91,777

 

71.5

%

808

 

Y

 

6.4

%

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

2004

 

1975

 

79,998

 

63.8

%

702

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

61,732

 

70.5

%

544

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

1997

 

1980

 

35,200

 

80.5

%

329

 

N

 

11.6

%

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

1997

 

1980/1995

 

80,277

 

80.6

%

563

 

Y

 

40.5

%

Slidell, LA

 

2001

 

1998

 

79,540

 

79.5

%

523

 

Y

 

46.6

%

Boston I, MA

 

2010

 

555

 

33,993

 

51.1

%

592

 

N

 

98.5

%

Boston II, MA

 

2002

 

2001

 

60,695

 

71.6

%

630

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Leominster, MA

 

1998

 

1987/88/00

 

53,823

 

65.3

%

500

 

Y

 

38.5

%

Medford, MA

 

2007

 

2001

 

58,815

 

67.1

%

656

 

Y

 

96.0

%

Baltimore, MD

 

2001

 

1999/00

 

93,350

 

77.2

%

809

 

Y

 

45.3

%

California, MD

 

2004

 

1998

 

77,865

 

86.7

%

723

 

Y

 

39.0

%

Gaithersburg, MD

 

2005

 

1998

 

87,045

 

85.8

%

784

 

Y

 

42.0

%

Laurel, MD †

 

2001

 

1978/99/00

 

162,792

 

73.8

%

1,020

 

N

 

41.1

%

Temple Hills, MD

 

2001

 

2000

 

97,200

 

83.4

%

826

 

Y

 

68.8

%

Grand Rapids, MI

 

1996

 

1976

 

87,381

 

66.3

%

525

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Portage, MI (6)

 

1996

 

1980

 

50,280

 

92.6

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Romulus, MI

 

1997

 

1997

 

42,050

 

73.8

%

339

 

Y

 

7.4

%

Wyoming, MI

 

1996

 

1987

 

91,158

 

67.2

%

635

 

N

 

0.0

%

Gulfport, MS

 

1997

 

1977/93

 

61,251

 

80.9

%

507

 

Y

 

33.5

%

Belmont, NC

 

2001

 

1996/97/98

 

81,448

 

71.7

%

581

 

N

 

24.2

%

Burlington I, NC

 

2001

 

1990/91/93/94/98

 

109,346

 

61.5

%

947

 

N

 

4.7

%

Burlington II, NC

 

2001

 

1991

 

42,205

 

69.3

%

394

 

Y

 

12.0

%

Cary, NC

 

2001

 

1993/94/97

 

112,324

 

75.2

%

793

 

N

 

7.3

%

Charlotte, NC

 

1999

 

1999

 

69,000

 

86.0

%

736

 

Y

 

52.8

%

Raleigh, NC

 

1998

 

1994/95

 

48,675

 

90.4

%

408

 

N

 

8.2

%

Brick, NJ

 

1994

 

1981

 

51,725

 

71.1

%

431

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cherry Hill, NJ

 

2010

 

2004

 

52,600

 

51.5

%

374

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Clifton, NJ

 

2005

 

2001

 

105,550

 

78.1

%

1,018

 

Y

 

85.5

%

 

25



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Westmont, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

53,700

 

89.0

%

402

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Wheeling I, IL

 

2004

 

1974

 

54,210

 

81.5

%

502

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Wheeling II, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

67,825

 

68.2

%

619

 

Y

 

7.3

%

Woodridge, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

50,725

 

91.3

%

472

 

Y

 

7.6

%

Indianapolis I, IN

 

2004

 

1987

 

43,600

 

91.5

%

327

 

N

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis II, IN

 

2004

 

1997

 

44,900

 

80.3

%

456

 

Y

 

15.6

%

Indianapolis III, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

60,850

 

83.3

%

501

 

Y

 

32.8

%

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

68,250

 

77.8

%

615

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

61,732

 

83.7

%

549

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis V, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

74,825

 

91.1

%

587

 

Y

 

33.6

%

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

73,353

 

74.1

%

728

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

2004

 

1992

 

91,807

 

77.7

%

818

 

Y

 

6.4

%

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

2004

 

1975

 

80,140

 

71.1

%

721

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

1997

 

1980

 

55,474

 

92.2

%

464

 

Y

 

8.3

%

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

1997

 

1980/1995

 

80,452

 

94.1

%

585

 

Y

 

40.4

%

Baton Rouge III, LA

 

1997

 

1982

 

60,770

 

95.6

%

445

 

Y

 

10.3

%

Prairieville, LA

 

1998

 

1991

 

28,319

 

83.5

%

341

 

Y

 

6.3

%

Slidell, LA

 

2001

 

1998

 

79,540

 

94.5

%

523

 

Y

 

46.6

%

Boston, MA

 

2002

 

2001

 

60,270

 

76.7

%

619

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Leominster, MA

 

1998

 

1987/88/00

 

54,081

 

74.8

%

504

 

Y

 

38.5

%

Medford, MA

 

2007

 

2001

 

58,577

 

72.5

%

653

 

Y

 

96.0

%

Baltimore, MD

 

2001

 

1999/00

 

93,700

 

84.1

%

843

 

Y

 

45.5

%

California, MD

 

2004

 

1998

 

77,678

 

83.8

%

761

 

Y

 

38.9

%

Gaithersburg, MD

 

2005

 

1998

 

86,970

 

84.0

%

795

 

Y

 

41.7

%

Laurel, MD †

 

2001

 

1978/99/00

 

162,297

 

92.4

%

1018

 

Y

 

41.0

%

Temple Hills, MD

 

2001

 

2000

 

97,250

 

83.3

%

815

 

Y

 

68.8

%

Grand Rapids, MI

 

1996

 

1976

 

87,031

 

72.8

%

526

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Portage, MI (6)

 

1996

 

1980

 

50,280

 

82.3

%

387

 

N

 

0.0

%

Romulus, MI

 

1997

 

1997

 

42,175

 

81.6

%

340

 

Y

 

7.5

%

Wyoming, MI

 

1996

 

1987

 

91,283

 

80.5

%

635

 

N

 

0.0

%

Biloxi, MS

 

1997

 

1978/93

 

66,394

 

85.4

%

594

 

Y

 

12.2

%

Gautier, MS

 

1997

 

1981

 

35,925

 

83.5

%

305

 

Y

 

7.4

%

Gulfport I, MS

 

1997

 

1970

 

68,320

 

83.2

%

494

 

Y

 

11.0

%

Gulfport II, MS

 

1997

 

1986

 

64,445

 

92.6

%

448

 

Y

 

18.7

%

Gulfport III, MS

 

1997

 

1977/93

 

61,251

 

83.7

%

517

 

Y

 

33.5

%

Waveland, MS

 

1998

 

1982/83/84/93

 

57,096

 

64.8

%

466

 

Y

 

37.9

%

Belmont, NC

 

2001

 

1996/97/98

 

80,512

 

91.8

%

605

 

N

 

25.2

%

Burlington I, NC

 

2001

 

1990/91/93/94/98

 

109,545

 

73.2

%

966

 

N

 

0.7

%

Burlington II, NC

 

2001

 

1991

 

42,280

 

77.3

%

397

 

Y

 

12.1

%

Cary, NC

 

2001

 

1993/94/97

 

111,772

 

82.3

%

798

 

N

 

7.3

%

Charlotte, NC

 

1999

 

1999

 

69,000

 

95.5

%

738

 

Y

 

52.8

%

Fayetteville I, NC

 

1997

 

1981

 

41,450

 

97.9

%

347

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fayetteville II, NC

 

1997

 

1993/95

 

54,225

 

97.1

%

547

 

Y

 

11.9

%

Raleigh, NC

 

1998

 

1994/95

 

48,675

 

91.6

%

412

 

Y

 

8.2

%

Brick, NJ

 

1994

 

1981

 

52,740

 

73.5

%

452

 

N

 

0.0

%

Clifton, NJ

 

2005

 

2001

 

105,550

 

85.7

%

1015

 

Y

 

85.5

%

Cranford, NJ

 

1994

 

1987

 

91,250

 

82.4

%

846

 

Y

 

7.9

%

East Hanover, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

107,679

 

62.5

%

1013

 

N

 

1.6

%

Elizabeth, NJ

 

2005

 

1925/97

 

38,892

 

56.5

%

677

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fairview, NJ

 

1997

 

1989

 

27,676

 

87.3

%

449

 

N

 

100.0

%

Hamilton, NJ

 

2006

 

1990

 

70,550

 

58.9

%

622

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Hoboken, NJ

 

2005

 

1945/97

 

34,280

 

85.0

%

745

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jersey City, NJ

 

1994

 

1985

 

91,361

 

81.3

%

1093

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Linden I, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

95,575

 

73.6

%

1059

 

N

 

2.9

%

Linden II, NJ †

 

1994

 

1982

 

35,800

 

92.5

%

23

 

N

 

0.0

%

Morris Township, NJ (5)

 

1997

 

1972

 

75,576

 

69.9

%

595

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Parsippany, NJ

 

1997

 

1981

 

66,325

 

81.0

%

605

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Randolph, NJ

 

2002

 

1998/99

 

52,565

 

76.8

%

593

 

Y

 

81.5

%

Sewell, NJ

 

2001

 

1984/98

 

57,767

 

67.6

%

479

 

N

 

5.0

%

Albuquerque I, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

65,927

 

86.7

%

607

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Albuquerque II, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

58,834

 

89.2

%

547

 

Y

 

4.2

%

Albuquerque III, NM

 

2005

 

1978

 

41,016

 

93.6

%

455

 

N

 

4.3

%

Albuquerque IV, NM

 

2005

 

1986

 

57,536

 

87.4

%

535

 

Y

 

4.7

%

Albuquerque V, NM

 

2006

 

1994

 

52,217

 

91.0

%

424

 

Y

 

10.2

%

Carlsbad, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

39,999

 

97.8

%

343

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Deming, NM

 

2005

 

1973/83

 

33,005

 

81.9

%

246

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Cruces, NM

 

2005

 

1984

 

43,850

 

85.7

%

401

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Lovington, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

15,751

 

95.2

%

264

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Silver City, NM

 

2005

 

1972

 

26,875

 

91.8

%

255

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

2005

 

1977/99/00

 

24,010

 

92.3

%

170

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Vegas I, NV †

 

2006

 

1986

 

50,882

 

80.6

%

402

 

Y

 

5.0

%

Las Vegas II, NV

 

2006

 

1997

 

49,000

 

85.4

%

538

 

Y

 

76.5

%

Endicott, NY

 

2005

 

1989

 

35,930

 

90.8

%

296

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Cranford, NJ

 

1994

 

1987

 

91,250

 

72.6

%

852

 

Y

 

7.9

%

East Hanover, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

107,579

 

64.4

%

970

 

N

 

1.6

%

Egg Harbor I, NJ

 

2010

 

2005

 

39,425

 

37.3

%

284

 

N

 

11.5

%

Egg Harbor II, NJ

 

2010

 

2002

 

71,175

 

37.5

%

706

 

N

 

16.4

%

Elizabeth, NJ

 

2005

 

1925/97

 

38,830

 

77.3

%

673

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fairview, NJ

 

1997

 

1989

 

27,925

 

68.5

%

449

 

N

 

100.0

%

Hamilton, NJ

 

2006

 

1990

 

70,550

 

60.5

%

610

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Hoboken, NJ

 

2005

 

1945/97

 

34,180

 

80.3

%

742

 

N

 

100.0

%

Linden, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

100,325

 

62.9

%

1,117

 

N

 

2.8

%

Morris Township, NJ (5)

 

1997

 

1972

 

71,776

 

72.4

%

565

 

Y

 

1.3

%

Parsippany, NJ

 

1997

 

1981

 

66,325

 

84.2

%

566

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Randolph, NJ

 

2002

 

1998/99

 

52,565

 

75.7

%

546

 

Y

 

82.5

%

Sewell, NJ

 

2001

 

1984/98

 

57,830

 

83.5

%

463

 

N

 

5.3

%

Albuquerque I, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

65,927

 

83.3

%

610

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Albuquerque II, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

58,598

 

83.1

%

514

 

Y

 

4.1

%

Albuquerque III, NM

 

2005

 

1986

 

57,536

 

87.3

%

503

 

Y

 

4.7

%

Carlsbad, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

39,999

 

95.2

%

341

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Deming, NM

 

2005

 

1973/83

 

33,005

 

83.5

%

232

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Cruces, NM

 

2005

 

1984

 

65,740

 

69.2

%

532

 

Y

 

2.1

%

Lovington, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

15,550

 

85.5

%

250

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Silver City, NM

 

2005

 

1972

 

26,975

 

86.2

%

252

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

2005

 

1977/99/00

 

24,010

 

74.2

%

174

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Vegas I, NV †

 

2006

 

1986

 

47,882

 

79.8

%

375

 

Y

 

5.6

%

Las Vegas II, NV

 

2006

 

1997

 

48,850

 

89.9

%

518

 

Y

 

75.2

%

Jamaica, NY

 

2001

 

2000

 

88,415

 

74.6

%

919

 

Y

 

30.7

%

Bronx, NY

 

2010

 

1931/2004

 

66,865

 

74.7

%

1,333

 

N

 

100.0

%

Brooklyn, NY

 

2010

 

1917/2004

 

56,970

 

76.6

%

861

 

N

 

100.0

%

Queens, NY

 

2010

 

1962/2003

 

61,090

 

65.9

%

1,143

 

N

 

25.2

%

Wyckoff, NY

 

2010

 

1910/2007

 

62,245

 

81.3

%

1,039

 

N

 

90.2

%

New Rochelle, NY

 

2005

 

1998

 

48,431

 

80.1

%

399

 

N

 

15.0

%

North Babylon, NY

 

1998

 

1988/99

 

78,188

 

79.5

%

650

 

N

 

9.0

%

Riverhead, NY

 

2005

 

1985/86/99

 

38,240

 

71.2

%

326

 

N

 

0.0

%

Southold, NY

 

2005

 

1989

 

58,795

 

70.5

%

599

 

N

 

3.0

%

Boardman, OH

 

1980

 

1980/89

 

65,495

 

74.9

%

515

 

Y

 

24.0

%

Canton I, OH

 

2005

 

1979/87

 

39,750

 

73.2

%

407

 

N

 

0.0

%

Canton II, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

26,200

 

88.9

%

192

 

N

 

0.0

%

Centerville I, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

80,690

 

68.2

%

619

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Centerville II, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

43,150

 

63.9

%

304

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cleveland I, OH

 

2005

 

1997/99

 

46,000

 

87.6

%

338

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Cleveland II, OH

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,425

 

53.2

%

568

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Columbus, OH

 

2006

 

1999

 

72,155

 

73.1

%

607

 

Y

 

26.1

%

Dayton I, OH

 

2004

 

1978

 

43,100

 

64.3

%

341

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dayton II, OH

 

2005

 

1989/00

 

48,149

 

80.0

%

391

 

Y

 

1.7

%

Euclid I, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

46,710

 

71.6

%

423

 

N

 

22.3

%

Euclid II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,275

 

59.5

%

376

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Grove City, OH

 

2006

 

1997

 

89,290

 

75.1

%

772

 

Y

 

16.9

%

Hilliard, OH

 

2006

 

1995

 

89,690

 

71.9

%

780

 

Y

 

24.5

%

Lakewood, OH

 

1989*

 

1989

 

39,337

 

81.2

%

456

 

Y

 

24.6

%

Louisville, OH

 

2005

 

1988/90

 

53,900

 

74.5

%

387

 

N

 

0.0

%

Marblehead, OH

 

2005

 

1988/98

 

52,300

 

78.8

%

378

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mason, OH

 

1998

 

1981

 

33,900

 

79.3

%

279

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mentor, OH

 

2005

 

1983/99

 

51,225

 

90.4

%

366

 

N

 

16.1

%

Miamisburg, OH

 

2004

 

1975

 

59,930

 

66.4

%

430

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980

 

93,025

 

88.5

%

669

 

Y

 

3.8

%

North Canton I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

45,200

 

78.7

%

318

 

Y

 

0.0

%

North Canton II, OH

 

1983*

 

1983

 

44,140

 

80.0

%

346

 

Y

 

15.8

%

North Olmsted I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

48,665

 

76.6

%

440

 

Y

 

7.0

%

North Olmsted II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,850

 

75.6

%

397

 

Y

 

14.2

%

North Randall, OH

 

1998*

 

1998/02

 

80,099

 

84.9

%

799

 

N

 

90.8

%

Perry, OH

 

2005

 

1992/97

 

63,700

 

75.7

%

420

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

2006

 

1979

 

66,895

 

71.9

%

664

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Strongsville, OH

 

2007

 

1978

 

43,727

 

85.0

%

399

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980/82/98

 

90,281

 

80.6

%

713

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westlake, OH

 

2005

 

2001

 

62,750

 

86.9

%

453

 

Y

 

6.1

%

Willoughby, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

34,064

 

70.4

%

266

 

Y

 

10.1

%

Youngstown, OH

 

1977*

 

1977

 

65,950

 

72.6

%

523

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Levittown, PA

 

2001

 

2000

 

76,180

 

79.6

%

654

 

Y

 

36.3

%

Philadelphia, PA

 

2001

 

1999

 

97,639

 

86.0

%

961

 

N

 

47.1

%

Alcoa, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

42,325

 

83.9

%

355

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Antioch, TN

 

2005

 

1985/98

 

76,160

 

83.3

%

618

 

Y

 

8.5

%

Cordova I, TN

 

2005

 

1987

 

54,125

 

72.5

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

26



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Jamaica, NY

 

2001

 

2000

 

89,455

 

75.7

%

924

 

Y

 

100.0

%

New Rochelle, NY †

 

2005

 

1998

 

48,431

 

94.2

%

407

 

N

 

15.0

%

North Babylon, NY

 

1998

 

1988/99

 

78,338

 

83.5

%

652

 

N

 

9.2

%

Riverhead, NY

 

2005

 

1985/86/99

 

38,690

 

91.0

%

341

 

N

 

0.0

%

Southold, NY †

 

2005

 

1989

 

58,609

 

79.0

%

588

 

N

 

3.1

%

Boardman, OH

 

1980

 

1980/89

 

65,495

 

70.5

%

532

 

Y

 

24.0

%

Brecksville, OH

 

1998

 

1970/89

 

58,452

 

88.5

%

448

 

Y

 

25.2

%

Canton I, OH

 

2005

 

1979/87

 

39,750

 

72.4

%

416

 

N

 

0.0

%

Canton II, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

26,200

 

90.3

%

197

 

N

 

0.0

%

Centerville I, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

86,390

 

73.2

%

640

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Centerville II, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

43,400

 

66.1

%

308

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cleveland I, OH

 

2005

 

1997/99

 

45,950

 

86.9

%

341

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Cleveland II, OH

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,450

 

64.1

%

582

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Columbus, OH

 

2006

 

1999

 

66,875

 

71.9

%

600

 

Y

 

28.1

%

Dayton I, OH

 

2004

 

1978

 

43,100

 

78.0

%

345

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dayton II, OH

 

2005

 

1989/00

 

48,149

 

90.1

%

387

 

Y

 

1.7

%

Euclid I, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

46,910

 

83.6

%

438

 

Y

 

22.2

%

Euclid II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,275

 

87.6

%

378

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Grove City, OH

 

2006

 

1997

 

89,290

 

80.5

%

776

 

Y

 

16.9

%

Hilliard, OH

 

2006

 

1995

 

89,715

 

67.1

%

780

 

Y

 

24.5

%

Hudson, OH †

 

1998

 

1987

 

65,240

 

82.7

%

393

 

N

 

9.3

%

Lakewood, OH

 

1989*

 

1989

 

39,267

 

82.3

%

467

 

Y

 

24.5

%

Louisville, OH

 

2005

 

1988/90

 

53,960

 

79.1

%

387

 

N

 

0.0

%

Marblehead, OH

 

2005

 

1988/98

 

52,300

 

75.9

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mason, OH

 

1998

 

1981

 

33,900

 

90.0

%

283

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mentor, OH

 

2005

 

1983/99

 

51,275

 

80.7

%

369

 

N

 

16.1

%

Miamisburg, OH

 

2004

 

1975

 

59,930

 

78.7

%

432

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980

 

93,025

 

84.3

%

694

 

Y

 

3.8

%

North Canton I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

45,400

 

83.5

%

321

 

Y

 

0.0

%

North Canton II, OH

 

1983*

 

1983

 

44,180

 

84.3

%

351

 

Y

 

15.8

%

North Olmsted I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

48,665

 

89.1

%

442

 

Y

 

7.0

%

North Olmsted II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,850

 

88.7

%

398

 

Y

 

14.2

%

North Randall, OH

 

1998*

 

1998/02

 

80,099

 

87.0

%

792

 

N

 

90.8

%

Perry, OH

 

2005

 

1992/97

 

63,850

 

79.1

%

425

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

2006

 

1979

 

67,545

 

68.2

%

669

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Strongsville, OH

 

2007

 

1978

 

43,727

 

80.8

%

399

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980/82/98

 

90,331

 

80.8

%

734

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westlake, OH

 

2005

 

2001

 

62,750

 

89.8

%

455

 

Y

 

6.1

%

Willoughby, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

34,454

 

79.5

%

269

 

Y

 

10.0

%

Youngstown, OH

 

1977*

 

1977

 

65,950

 

83.9

%

530

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Levittown, PA

 

2001

 

2000

 

76,230

 

81.0

%

667

 

Y

 

36.3

%

Philadelphia, PA

 

2001

 

1999

 

100,347

 

77.5

%

942

 

N

 

29.8

%

Alcoa, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

42,325

 

86.7

%

364

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Antioch, TN

 

2005

 

1985/98

 

76,150

 

91.9

%

602

 

Y

 

8.2

%

Cordova I, TN

 

2005

 

1987

 

54,225

 

88.2

%

388

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Cordova II, TN

 

2006

 

1995

 

67,600

 

86.7

%

720

 

Y

 

7.2

%

Knoxville I, TN

 

1997

 

1984

 

29,377

 

89.3

%

296

 

Y

 

6.8

%

Knoxville II, TN

 

1997

 

1985

 

38,000

 

87.7

%

340

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville III, TN

 

1998

 

1991

 

45,736

 

85.3

%

452

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville IV, TN

 

1998

 

1983

 

58,852

 

82.2

%

440

 

N

 

1.1

%

Knoxville V, TN

 

1998

 

1977

 

42,790

 

94.8

%

372

 

N

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VI, TN

 

2005

 

1975

 

63,440

 

79.5

%

587

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VII, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

54,994

 

84.1

%

448

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

2005

 

1978

 

96,518

 

79.1

%

771

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis I, TN

 

2001

 

1999

 

91,300

 

92.6

%

700

 

N

 

51.3

%

Memphis II, TN

 

2001

 

2000

 

71,960

 

84.7

%

560

 

N

 

46.3

%

Memphis III, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

41,137

 

87.3

%

356

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Memphis IV, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

38,750

 

86.9

%

326

 

Y

 

7.9

%

Memphis V, TN

 

2005

 

1981

 

60,370

 

84.2

%

499

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VI, TN

 

2006

 

1985/93

 

109,317

 

79.4

%

873

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Memphis VII, TN

 

2006

 

1980/85

 

115,303

 

77.6

%

582

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VIII, TN †

 

2006

 

1990

 

96,060

 

70.3

%

562

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville I, TN

 

2005

 

1984

 

106,930

 

65.8

%

700

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville II, TN

 

2005

 

1986/00

 

83,274

 

86.5

%

633

 

Y

 

6.5

%

Nashville III, TN

 

2006

 

1985

 

99,600

 

75.0

%

638

 

Y

 

5.1

%

Nashville IV, TN

 

2006

 

1986/00

 

102,425

 

88.6

%

721

 

Y

 

7.0

%

Austin I, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

59,520

 

70.3

%

547

 

Y

 

59.1

%

Austin II, TX

 

2006

 

2000/03

 

65,401

 

94.8

%

594

 

Y

 

38.8

%

Austin III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

71,030

 

79.7

%

581

 

Y

 

84.9

%

Baytown, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

38,950

 

92.2

%

365

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bryan, TX

 

2005

 

1994

 

60,450

 

78.9

%

495

 

Y

 

0.0

%

College Station, TX

 

2005

 

1993

 

26,550

 

88.7

%

346

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dallas, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,707

 

79.2

%

552

 

Y

 

26.3

%

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Cordova II, TN

 

2006

 

1995

 

67,700

 

83.3

%

715

 

Y

 

7.1

%

Knoxville I, TN

 

1997

 

1984

 

29,337

 

87.1

%

283

 

Y

 

6.8

%

Knoxville II, TN

 

1997

 

1985

 

38,000

 

75.0

%

328

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville III, TN

 

1998

 

1991

 

45,736

 

73.2

%

443

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville IV, TN

 

1998

 

1983

 

58,752

 

64.6

%

438

 

N

 

1.1

%

Knoxville V, TN

 

1998

 

1977

 

42,790

 

70.0

%

370

 

N

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VI, TN

 

2005

 

1975

 

63,440

 

71.9

%

586

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VII, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

55,094

 

67.2

%

442

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

2005

 

1978

 

95,868

 

65.6

%

761

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis I, TN

 

2001

 

1999

 

92,320

 

88.3

%

695

 

N

 

57.1

%

Memphis II, TN

 

2001

 

2000

 

71,710

 

80.2

%

556

 

N

 

46.3

%

Memphis III, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

40,807

 

79.8

%

347

 

Y

 

6.4

%

Memphis IV, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

38,750

 

81.5

%

322

 

Y

 

4.3

%

Memphis V, TN

 

2005

 

1981

 

60,120

 

84.7

%

498

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VI, TN

 

2006

 

1985/93

 

108,771

 

85.1

%

874

 

Y

 

3.3

%

Memphis VII, TN

 

2006

 

1980/85

 

115,253

 

68.3

%

578

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VIII, TN †

 

2006

 

1990

 

96,060

 

72.6

%

553

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville I, TN

 

2005

 

1984

 

103,310

 

80.7

%

693

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville II, TN

 

2005

 

1986/00

 

83,584

 

82.7

%

633

 

Y

 

6.6

%

Nashville III, TN

 

2006

 

1985

 

101,475

 

72.8

%

620

 

Y

 

5.2

%

Nashville IV, TN

 

2006

 

1986/00

 

102,450

 

89.8

%

727

 

Y

 

7.0

%

Austin I, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

59,520

 

81.0

%

536

 

Y

 

58.8

%

Austin II, TX

 

2006

 

2000/03

 

65,241

 

88.3

%

594

 

Y

 

38.9

%

Austin III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

70,560

 

80.8

%

579

 

Y

 

85.4

%

Baytown, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

38,950

 

77.4

%

360

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bryan, TX

 

2005

 

1994

 

60,450

 

68.1

%

495

 

Y

 

0.0

%

College Station, TX

 

2005

 

1993

 

26,550

 

69.8

%

346

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dallas, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,382

 

86.7

%

536

 

Y

 

28.5

%

Denton, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

60,836

 

83.5

%

462

 

Y

 

3.9

%

El Paso I, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

59,652

 

82.4

%

519

 

Y

 

0.9

%

El Paso II, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

48,704

 

92.5

%

413

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso III, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

71,276

 

76.2

%

595

 

Y

 

2.0

%

El Paso IV, TX

 

2005

 

1983

 

67,058

 

81.9

%

523

 

Y

 

3.2

%

El Paso V, TX

 

2005

 

1982

 

62,300

 

74.4

%

398

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VI, TX

 

2005

 

1985

 

36,570

 

91.6

%

258

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VII, TX †

 

2005

 

1982

 

34,545

 

82.1

%

13

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fort Worth I, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

50,621

 

76.4

%

406

 

Y

 

26.6

%

Fort Worth II, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

72,925

 

83.5

%

655

 

Y

 

49.0

%

Frisco I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

50,854

 

84.0

%

431

 

Y

 

17.5

%

Frisco II, TX

 

2005

 

1998/02

 

71,299

 

83.5

%

511

 

Y

 

23.8

%

Frisco III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

75,215

 

74.9

%

610

 

Y

 

88.0

%

Frisco IV, TX

 

2010

 

2007

 

74,835

 

73.7

%

511

 

Y

 

16.4

%

Garland I, TX

 

2006

 

1991

 

70,100

 

79.8

%

652

 

Y

 

4.4

%

Garland II, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

68,425

 

79.1

%

470

 

Y

 

39.6

%

Greenville I, TX

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

59,385

 

73.4

%

451

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Greenville II, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

44,900

 

63.7

%

312

 

N

 

36.3

%

Houston I, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

100,630

 

79.8

%

626

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston II, TX

 

2005

 

1977

 

71,300

 

79.0

%

391

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston III, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

61,120

 

70.4

%

462

 

Y

 

4.3

%

Houston IV, TX

 

2005

 

1987

 

43,975

 

70.9

%

383

 

Y

 

6.1

%

Houston V, TX †

 

2006

 

1980/1997

 

125,930

 

85.6

%

1,011

 

Y

 

55.1

%

Keller, TX

 

2006

 

2000

 

61,885

 

79.5

%

486

 

Y

 

21.1

%

La Porte, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

44,850

 

81.0

%

429

 

Y

 

18.6

%

Lewisville, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

58,140

 

62.7

%

429

 

Y

 

20.2

%

Mansfield, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

63,075

 

81.3

%

495

 

Y

 

38.4

%

McKinney I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

47,040

 

89.4

%

363

 

Y

 

9.0

%

McKinney II, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

70,050

 

80.2

%

539

 

Y

 

46.3

%

North Richland Hills, TX

 

2005

 

2002

 

57,175

 

82.8

%

432

 

Y

 

47.6

%

Roanoke, TX

 

2005

 

1996/01

 

59,300

 

83.7

%

448

 

Y

 

30.0

%

San Antonio I, TX

 

2005

 

2005

 

73,330

 

84.2

%

573

 

Y

 

79.0

%

San Antonio II, TX

 

2006

 

2005

 

73,230

 

89.2

%

670

 

N

 

82.3

%

San Antonio III, TX

 

2007

 

2006

 

72,075

 

85.6

%

566

 

N

 

87.0

%

Sherman I, TX

 

2005

 

1998

 

54,975

 

77.3

%

506

 

Y

 

21.1

%

Sherman II, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

48,425

 

78.3

%

391

 

Y

 

30.9

%

Spring, TX

 

2006

 

1980/86

 

72,751

 

74.6

%

538

 

N

 

14.1

%

Murray I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

60,180

 

69.9

%

647

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murray II, UT †

 

2005

 

1978

 

71,221

 

85.6

%

371

 

Y

 

2.6

%

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

56,446

 

70.2

%

732

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

2005

 

1978

 

53,676

 

62.8

%

503

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

69,475

 

67.4

%

601

 

N

 

21.4

%

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

2005

 

1998/01

 

61,257

 

65.9

%

558

 

N

 

100.0

%

McLearen, VA

 

2010

 

2002

 

69,490

 

79.0

%

719

 

Y

 

91.2

%

 

27



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Denton, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

60,836

 

83.8

%

514

 

Y

 

3.9

%

El Paso I, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

59,864

 

87.7

%

515

 

Y

 

0.9

%

El Paso II, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

48,692

 

84.8

%

415

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso III, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

71,276

 

87.7

%

611

 

Y

 

2.0

%

El Paso IV, TX

 

2005

 

1983

 

48,962

 

78.0

%

383

 

Y

 

4.6

%

El Paso V, TX

 

2005

 

1982

 

62,825

 

85.4

%

395

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VI, TX

 

2005

 

1985

 

36,620

 

81.0

%

264

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VII, TX †

 

2005

 

1982

 

34,545

 

80.8

%

17

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fort Worth I, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

49,778

 

72.7

%

405

 

Y

 

27.0

%

Fort Worth II, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

72,925

 

75.7

%

668

 

Y

 

49.0

%

Frisco I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

50,854

 

89.8

%

443

 

Y

 

17.5

%

Frisco II, TX

 

2005

 

1998/02

 

71,339

 

78.1

%

519

 

Y

 

22.4

%

Frisco III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

72,275

 

66.5

%

594

 

Y

 

87.5

%

Garland I, TX

 

2006

 

1991

 

70,000

 

83.5

%

682

 

Y

 

4.6

%

Garland II, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

68,475

 

69.1

%

476

 

Y

 

39.7

%

Greenville I, TX

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

59,385

 

90.7

%

452

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Greenville II, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

44,900

 

71.8

%

318

 

N

 

36.3

%

Houston I, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

101,350

 

93.9

%

635

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston II, TX

 

2005

 

1977

 

71,300

 

88.3

%

389

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston III, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

60,820

 

88.0

%

479

 

Y

 

4.0

%

Houston IV, TX

 

2005

 

1987

 

43,775

 

94.7

%

378

 

Y

 

6.2

%

Houston V, TX †

 

2006

 

1980/1997

 

127,145

 

79.0

%

1016

 

Y

 

54.7

%

Keller, TX

 

2006

 

2000

 

61,885

 

96.9

%

488

 

Y

 

21.1

%

La Porte, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

45,100

 

86.3

%

434

 

Y

 

18.6

%

Lewisville, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

58,465

 

82.8

%

439

 

Y

 

19.3

%

Mansfield, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

63,025

 

83.9

%

501

 

Y

 

38.4

%

McKinney I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

47,020

 

96.7

%

370

 

Y

 

9.2

%

McKinney II, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

70,050

 

92.7

%

540

 

Y

 

46.3

%

North Richland Hills, TX

 

2005

 

2002

 

57,025

 

78.3

%

451

 

Y

 

47.4

%

Roanoke, TX

 

2005

 

1996/01

 

59,400

 

93.3

%

455

 

Y

 

30.1

%

San Antonio I, TX

 

2005

 

2005

 

75,270

 

39.4

%

584

 

Y

 

78.8

%

San Antonio II, TX

 

2006

 

2005

 

73,205

 

62.3

%

672

 

N

 

82.3

%

San Antonio III, TX

 

2007

 

2006

 

72,525

 

49.6

%

579

 

N

 

87.1

%

Sherman I, TX

 

2005

 

1998

 

55,050

 

85.5

%

514

 

Y

 

20.8

%

Sherman II, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

48,425

 

85.2

%

392

 

Y

 

30.9

%

Spring, TX

 

2006

 

1980/86

 

72,801

 

88.2

%

536

 

Y

 

14.2

%

Murray I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

60,280

 

93.1

%

679

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murray II, UT †

 

2005

 

1978

 

71,421

 

98.0

%

384

 

Y

 

2.6

%

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

56,446

 

88.5

%

763

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

2005

 

1978

 

53,676

 

94.6

%

510

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

69,450

 

62.6

%

634

 

N

 

21.5

%

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

2005

 

1998/01

 

61,493

 

56.7

%

580

 

N

 

100.0

%

Milwaukee, WI

 

2004

 

1988

 

58,515

 

84.1

%

486

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total/Weighted Average (409 facilities)

 

 

 

26,119,184

 

79.5

%

229,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Mannasas, VA

 

2010

 

1998

 

73,045

 

76.0

%

639

 

Y

 

51.1

%

Milwaukee, WI

 

2004

 

1988

 

58,500

 

76.2

%

485

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total/Weighted Average (363 Facilities)

 

 

 

 

 

23,634,618

 

76.3

%

206,322

 

 

 

 

 

 


* Denotes facilities developed by us.

 

† Denotes facilities that contain a significant amount of commercial rentable square footage.  All of this commercial space, which was developed in conjunction with the self-storage units, is located within or adjacent to our self-storage facilities and is managed by our self-storage facility managers.  As of December 31, 2007,2010, there was an aggregate of approximately 753,000420,000 rentable square feet of commercial space at these facilities.

 

(1) Represents the year acquired for those facilities acquired from a third party or the year developed for those facilities developed by us.

 

(2) Represents occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet at December 31, 2007.2010.

 

(3) Indicates whether a facility has an on-site apartment where a manager resides.

 

(4) Represents the percentage of rentable square feet in climate-controlled units.

 

(5) We do not own the land at this facility.  We leasedlease the land pursuant to a ground lease that expires in 2008,2013, but have nineeight five-year renewal options.

 

(6) We have ground leases for certain small parcels of land adjacent to these facilities that expire between 20082010 and 2015.

28



 

Our growth has been achieved by internal growth and by adding facilities to our portfolio each year through acquisitions and development. The tables set forth below show the average occupancy, annual rent per occupied square foot, average occupied square feet and total revenues for our facilities owned as of December 31, 20072010, and for each of the lastprevious three years, grouped by the year end during which we first owned or operated the facility.

 

Our Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupied Square Feet (2)(1)

 

 

 

 

Rentable Square

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

Feet

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2004 and earlier

 

195

 

12,606,750

 

82.8

%

81.4

%

80.6

%

2005

 

137

 

7,614,578

 

81.9

%

80.2

%

82.6

%

2006

 

60

 

4,578,622

 

 

 

75.6

%

75.2

%

2007

 

17

 

1,319,234

 

 

 

 

 

71.3

%

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2007

 

409

 

26,119,184

 

82.6

%

80.2

%

80.0

%

 

 

 

 

Rentable Square

 

Average Occupancy

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

Feet

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

22,811,295

 

76.7

%

76.0

%

79.8

%

2008

 

1

 

84,975

 

80.1

%

72.3

%

69.5

%

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

738,348

 

67.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

23,634,618

 

76.7

%

75.9

%

79.8

%

28



Table of Contents

 

Our Facilities by Year Acquired - Annual Rent Per Occupied Square Foot (2)(1)

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2004 and earlier

 

195

 

$

10.80

 

$

11.38

 

$

11.57

 

2005

 

137

 

8.34

 

10.53

 

10.43

 

2006

 

60

 

 

 

10.22

 

10.26

 

2007

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

11.16

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2007

 

409

 

$

9.88

 

$

10.61

 

$

10.99

 

 

 

 

 

Rent per Square Foot

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

$

11.57

 

$

11.73

 

$

11.49

 

2008

 

1

 

21.59

 

22.13

 

21.12

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

13.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

$

11.66

 

$

11.76

 

$

11.52

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupied Square Feet (3)

 

 

 

 

Average Occupied Square Feet

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

17,512,913

 

17,982,611

 

18,961,704

 

2008

 

1

 

67,973

 

61,113

 

58,844

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

480,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

18,061,804

 

18,043,724

 

19,020,548

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Total Revenues (dollars in thousands) (4)

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

$

209,222

 

$

215,245

 

$

222,748

 

2008

 

1

 

1,527

 

1,404

 

1,309

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

1,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

$

212,412

 

$

216,649

 

$

224,057

 

 


(1)  For facilities developed by us, “Year Acquired” represents the year in which such facilities were acquired by our operating partnership from an affiliated entity, which in some cases is later than the year developed.

(2)  Determined by dividing the aggregate rental revenue for each twelve-month period by the average of the month-end occupied square feet for the period.  Rental revenue includes customer rental revenues, access, administrative and late fees and revenues from auctions, but does not include ancillary revenues generated at our facilities.

 

29



Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupied Square Feet (2)

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2004 and earlier

 

195

 

10,575,509

 

10,348,470

 

10,189,296

 

2005

 

137

 

6,256,685

 

6,238,827

 

6,299,831

 

2006

 

60

 

 

 

3,465,677

 

3,452,109

 

2007

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

934,799

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2007

 

409

 

16,832,194

 

20,052,974

 

20,876,035

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Total Revenues (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2004 and earlier

 

195

 

117,248

 

122,022

 

124,466

 

2005

 

137

 

28,105

 

63,610

 

69,603

 

2006

 

60

 

 

 

26,659

 

37,837

 

2007

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

4,969

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2007 (4)

 

409

 

145,353

 

212,291

 

236,875

 


(1)  For facilities developed by us, “Year Acquired” represents the year in which such facilities were acquired by our operating partnership from an affiliated entity, which in some cases is later than the year developed.

 

(2)(3)  Represents the average of the aggregate month-end occupied square feet for the twelve-month period for each group of facilities.

 

(3)29



Table of Contents

(4)  Represents the result obtained by multiplying annual renttotal income per occupied square foot by the average occupied square feet for the twelve-month period for each group of facilities.

(4)  Represents total revenues as presented in our historical  This result will vary from amounts reported on the financial statements.

 

Planned Renovations and Improvements

 

We have a capital improvement and property renovation program that includes office upgrades, adding climate control at selected units, construction of parking areas, safety and security enhancements, and general facility upgrades.  For 2008,2011, we anticipate spending approximately $7 million to $9 million associated with these capital expenditures and expect to enhance the safety and improve the aesthetic appeal of our facilities.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are not presently involved in any material litigation nor,claims from time to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us or our properties. We are involved in routine litigation arisingtime, including the proceeding identified below, which arise in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, we have made adequate provisions for potential liabilities, if any, arising from any such matters.  However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the costs and other effects of pending or future litigation, governmental investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings (whether civil or criminal), settlements, judgments and investigations, claims and changes in any such matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, nonefinancial condition and operating results.

On November 4, 2009, our Operating Partnership was sued in the Delaware Court of Chancery by Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, and Amsdell Holdings I, Inc. (collectively, the “Amsdell Plaintiffs”).  The Amsdell Plaintiffs amended their complaint in 2010 to include the Company as a defendant.  The Amsdell Plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeks to compel our Operating Partnership to indemnify the Amsdell Plaintiffs for losses and expenses allegedly incurred by the Amsdell Plaintiffs from legal proceedings filed against the Amsdell Plaintiffs, which we believeproceedings alleged, inter alia, that the Amsdell Plaintiffs breached an agreement to be material.purchase certain real estate located in Brighton, Massachusetts in 2001.  We are vigorously defending against this action.  The matter is presently in the discovery phase and no trial date has been set by the Court.  Wh ile management currently believes that resolving this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results, litigation, as noted above, is subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of this matter may change in the future.

 

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERSREMOVED AND RESERVED

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

30



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

As of December 31, 2007,2010, there were approximately 2952 registered record holders of our common shares.  This figure does not include beneficial owners who hold shares in nominee name.  The following table shows the high and low closing prices per share for our common shares, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and the cash dividends declared with respect to such shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Dividends

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Cash Dividends 
Declared

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Declared

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

22.28

 

$

19.94

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

5.03

 

$

1.40

 

$

0.025

 

Second quarter

 

19.75

 

16.05

 

0.29

 

 

$

4.93

 

$

2.12

 

$

0.025

 

Third quarter

 

21.94

 

18.51

 

0.29

 

 

$

6.83

 

$

4.23

 

$

0.025

 

Fourth quarter

 

22.66

 

20.35

 

0.29

 

 

$

7.60

 

$

5.70

 

$

0.025

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

23.20

 

19.57

 

0.29

 

 

$

7.70

 

$

6.31

 

$

0.025

 

Second quarter

 

20.11

 

16.14

 

0.29

 

 

$

8.98

 

$

7.25

 

$

0.025

 

Third quarter

 

16.61

 

12.15

 

0.29

 

 

$

8.86

 

$

6.88

 

$

0.025

 

Fourth quarter

 

14.31

 

9.16

 

0.18

 

 

$

9.56

 

$

8.19

 

$

0.070

 

 

Since our initial quarter as a publicly-traded REIT, we have made regular quarterly distributions to our shareholders.  Distributions to shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, we provide each of our shareholders a statement detailing distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of our dividends for 20072010 was 29.42%100% ordinary income 6.39% capital gain distribution and 64.19% return of capital.distribution.

 

We intend to continue to declare quarterly distributions.  However, we cannot provide any assurance as to the amount or timing of future distributions.  Under our new revolving credit facility, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we are restricted from paying distributions on our common shares that would exceed an amount equal to the greater of (i) a certain percentage95% of our funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status.

 

To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our earnings and profits, as computed for federal income tax purposes, these distributions will represent a return of capital, rather than a dividend, for federal income tax purposes. Distributions that are treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes generally will not be taxable as a dividend to a U.S. shareholder, but will reduce the shareholder’s basis in its shares (but not below zero) and therefore can result in the shareholder having a higher gain upon a subsequent sale of such shares.  Return of capital distributions in excess of a shareholder’s basis generally will be treated as gain from the sale of such shares for federal income tax purposes.

 

In October 2005, we completed a follow-on public offering of our common shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $378.7 million, after deducting underwriting discount and commissions and expenses of the offering. A portion of these proceeds was used to repay certain outstanding indebtedness, including (i) $108.3 million to repay the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving credit facility, and (ii) $39.8 million to repay outstanding mortgage loans secured by 37 of our facilities. Net proceeds of approximately $110.2 million were used to fund the acquisition of 19 self-storage facilities. The remaining net proceeds of approximately $120.4 million were used for the acquisition and development of additional self-storage facilities, budgeted capital improvements and general corporate purposes.

Share Performance Graph

 

The SEC requires us to present a chart comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares with the cumulative total shareholder return of (i) a broad equity index and (ii) a published industry or peer group index. The following chart compares the yearly cumulative total shareholder return for our common shares with the cumulative shareholder return of companies on (i) the S&P 500 Index, (ii) the Russell 2000 and (iii) the NAREIT All Equity REIT Index as provided by NAREIT for the period beginning with October 22, 2004 (the first closing share price following the initial public offering of our common shares)December 31, 2005 and ending December 31, 2007.2010.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Period Ending

 

Index

 

10/22/04

 

12/31/04

 

06/30/05

 

12/31/05

 

06/30/06

 

12/31/06

 

06/30/07

 

12/31/07

 

U-Store-It Trust

 

$

100.00

 

$

108.44

 

$

120.81

 

$

133.37

 

$

122.93

 

$

137.82

 

$

112.91

 

$

65.58

 

S&P 500

 

100.00

 

110.97

 

110.65

 

116.30

 

119.45

 

134.67

 

144.26

 

142.29

 

Russell 2000

 

100.00

 

115.08

 

113.64

 

120.32

 

130.20

 

142.42

 

151.60

 

140.19

 

NAREIT All Equity REIT Index

 

100.00

 

111.12

 

118.21

 

124.64

 

140.74

 

168.34

 

158.43

 

141.92

 

 

 

Period Ending

 

Index

 

12/31/05

 

12/31/06

 

12/31/07

 

12/31/08

 

12/31/09

 

12/31/10

 

U-Store-It Trust

 

100.00

 

103.33

 

49.25

 

25.62

 

43.25

 

57.05

 

S&P 500

 

100.00

 

115.79

 

122.16

 

76.96

 

97.33

 

111.99

 

Russell 2000

 

100.00

 

118.37

 

116.51

 

77.15

 

98.11

 

124.46

 

NAREIT All Equity REIT Index

 

100.00

 

135.06

 

113.87

 

70.91

 

90.76

 

116.12

 

 

The following table provides information about repurchases of the Company’s common shares during the three-month period ended December 31, 2007:2010.

 

Total Number of
Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid
Per Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs

Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
(1)

October

N/A

N/A

N/A

3,000,000

November

N/A

N/A

N/A

3,000,000

December

N/A

N/A

N/A

3,000,000

Total

N/A

N/A

3,000,000

 

 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased (1)

 

Average Price Paid 
Per Share

 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased as 
Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 
Programs

 

Maximum Number 
of Shares that May 
Yet Be Purchased 
Under the Plans

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October

 

171

 

$

8.43

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

November

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

December

 

544

 

$

8.79

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

715

 

 

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

 


(1)  Represents common shares withheld by the Company upon the vesting of restricted shares to cover employee tax obligations.

32



Table of Contents

(2)  On June 27, 2007, the Company announced that the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program for up to 3.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares.  Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Trustees, the program will expire when the number of authorized shares has been repurchased.  For the three-month period ended December 31, 2007, theThe Company has made no repurchases under this program.

32



 

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on a historical consolidated basis for the Company, and on a combined historical basis for Acquiport/Amsdell (the “Predecessor”).Company.  The selected historical financial information as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the periods indicated in the five-year period ended December 31, 2007 were2010 was derived from the Company’s and the Predecessor’s financial statements. Historical information for the Company has not been presented prior to October 21, 2004, the date on which the Company consummated the mergers of Amsdell Partners, Inc. and High Tide LLC with and into the Company, because during the period prior to the mergers, the Company did not have material corporate activity.

The Predecessor’s combined historical financial information includes the following entities, which are the entities referred to collectively in this Form 10-K as Acquiport/Amsdell, for periods prior to October 21, 2004: the operating partnership (formerly known as Acquiport/Amsdell I Limited Partnership, which is sometimes referred to herein as “Acquiport I”) and its consolidated subsidiaries, Acquiport/Amsdell III, LLC (“Acquiport III”), Acquiport/Amsdell IV, LLC, Acquiport/Amsdell V, LLC, Acquiport/Amsdell VI, LLC, Acquiport/Amsdell VII, LLC, and USI II, LLC. The Predecessor also includes three additional facilities: Lakewood, OH; Lake Worth, FL; and Vero Beach I, FL which were contributed to our operating partnership in connection with the IPO. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation and combination. At October 20, 2004, the Predecessor owned 155 self-storage facilities.

 

The following data should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto of the Company and the Predecessor and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

 

The Company

 

The Predecessor (1)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Period
October 21,
through
December 31,

 

Period
January 1,
through
October 20,

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

211,974

 

$

195,331

 

$

135,169

 

$

21,410

 

$

65,722

 

$

76,898

 

Other property related income

 

16,828

 

14,816

 

10,001

 

1,452

 

3,211

 

3,916

 

Other - related party

 

365

 

457

 

405

 

71

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

229,167

 

210,604

 

145,575

 

22,933

 

68,933

 

80,814

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

96,802

 

85,415

 

54,793

 

9,767

 

26,170

 

28,089

 

Property operating expense -related party

 

59

 

69

 

43

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

70,192

 

64,079

 

39,479

 

5,800

 

16,528

 

19,494

 

Asset write-off

 

 

305

 

 

 

 

 

Lease abandonment charge

 

1,316

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

17,786

 

4,140

 

 

 

General and administrative -related party

 

337

 

613

 

736

 

114

 

 

 

Management fees — related party (2)

 

 

 

 

 

3,689

 

4,361

 

Total operating expenses

 

190,672

 

172,156

 

112,837

 

19,821

 

46,387

 

51,944

 

Operating income

 

38,495

 

38,448

 

32,738

 

3,112

 

22,546

 

28,870

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

(31,907

)

(4,428

)

(19,385

)

(15,128

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

(2,045

)

(286

)

(5,958

)

(1,296

)

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

(1,907

)

(93

)

(7,012

)

 

 

Costs incurred to acquire management company —  related party

 

 

 

 

(22,152

)

 

 

Interest income

 

401

 

1,336

 

2,404

 

37

 

69

 

12

 

Other

 

118

 

191

 

(47

)

(78

)

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before minority interest

 

(16,866

)

(9,532

)

1,050

 

(30,807

)

(2,728

)

12,458

 

Minority interest

 

1,385

 

790

 

(71

)

898

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(15,481

)

(8,742

)

979

 

(29,909

)

(2,728

)

12,458

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

102

 

208

 

452

 

 

 

171

 

Gain on sale of storage facilities

 

2,517

 

 

179

 

 

 

3,329

 

Minority interest attributable to discontinued operations

 

(215

)

(17

)

(42

)

 

 

 

Income from discontinued
operations

 

2,404

 

191

 

589

 

 

 

3,500

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

$

1,568

 

$

(29,909

)

$

(2,728

)

$

15,958

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.02

 

$

(0.80

)

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations

 

$

0.04

 

$

 

$

0.02

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.04

 

$

(0.80

)

 

 

 

 

Weighted average basic common shares outstanding (3)

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,120

 

37,478

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (3)

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,203

 

37,478

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution declared (4)

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.16

 

$

1.13

 

$

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

$

186,330

 

$

171,059

 

Other property related income

 

18,640

 

16,086

 

15,130

 

15,148

 

13,344

 

Other - related party

 

 

 

 

365

 

457

 

Property management fee income

 

2,829

 

56

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

216,826

 

210,732

 

217,330

 

201,843

 

184,860

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

93,696

 

91,380

 

92,533

 

86,358

 

75,921

 

Property operating expenses - related party

 

 

 

 

59

 

69

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

62,945

 

69,125

 

71,974

 

63,183

 

58,043

 

Asset write-off

 

 

 

 

 

305

 

Lease abandonment

 

 

 

 

1,316

 

 

General and administrative

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

24,964

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

General and administrative - related party

 

 

 

 

337

 

613

 

Total operating expenses

 

182,047

 

183,074

 

189,471

 

173,219

 

156,626

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

34,779

 

27,658

 

27,859

 

28,624

 

28,234

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(37,794

)

(45,269

)

(52,014

)

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

(1,929

)

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

(1,907

)

Interest income

 

621

 

681

 

153

 

401

 

1,336

 

Acquisition related costs

 

(759

)

 

 

 

 

Other

 

(235

)

(33

)

94

 

118

 

191

 

Total other expense

 

(44,630

)

(46,960

)

(53,696

)

(55,361

)

(47,980

)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

(9,851

)

(19,302

)

(25,837

)

(26,737

)

(19,746

)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

9,973

 

10,422

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

2,517

 

 

Total discontinued operations

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

12,490

 

10,422

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

3,102

 

(14,247

)

(9,324

)

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

381

 

60

 

(310

)

1,170

 

773

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

 

 

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.32

)

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.04

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.46

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.17

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding (1)

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

$

(24,542

)

$

(18,108

)

Total discontinued operations

 

3,656

 

17,984

 

26,595

 

11,465

 

9,557

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

 

34



Table of Contents

 

 

The Company

 

The Predecessor (1)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Period
October 21,
through
December 31,

 

Period
January 1,
through
October 20,

 

Year Ended
December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Balance Sheet Data (as of end of period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

$

1,246,295

 

$

729,155

 

 

 

$

395,599

 

Total assets

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

1,476,321

 

774,272

 

 

 

410,636

 

Revolving credit facility

 

219,000

 

90,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured term loan

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured term loan

 

47,444

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

561,057

 

588,930

 

669,282

 

380,496

 

 

 

271,571

 

Total liabilities

 

1,083,230

 

930,948

 

714,157

 

406,243

 

 

 

280,743

 

Minority interest

 

48,982

 

56,898

 

63,695

 

10,804

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’/owners’ equity

 

555,619

 

627,493

 

698,469

 

357,225

 

 

 

129,893

 

Total liabilities and
shareholders’/owners’ equity

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

1,476,321

 

774,272

 

 

 

410,636

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of facilities (end of period)

 

409

 

399

 

339

 

201

 

155

 

155

 

Total rentable square feet (end of period)

 

26,119

 

25,436

 

20,828

 

12,978

 

9,683

 

9,863

 

Occupancy (end of period)

 

79.5

%

78.2

%

81.2

%

82.2

%

85.2

%

82.6

%

Cash dividends declared per share (4)

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.16

 

$

1.13

 

$

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

1,559,958

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

Total assets

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

1,597,659

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

Revolving credit facility

 

43,000

 

 

172,000

 

219,000

 

90,500

 

Unsecured term loan

 

200,000

 

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

Secured term loan

 

 

200,000

 

57,419

 

47,444

 

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

548,085

 

561,057

 

588,930

 

Total liabilities

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

1,028,705

 

1,083,230

 

930,948

 

Noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

46,026

 

48,982

 

107,606

 

U-Store-It Trust shareholders’ equity

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

522,928

 

555,619

 

576,785

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

1,597,659

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of facilities

 

363

 

367

 

387

 

409

 

399

 

Total rentable square feet (in thousands)

 

23,635

 

23,749

 

24,973

 

26,119

 

25,436

 

Occupancy percentage

 

76.3

%

75.2

%

78.9

%

79.5

%

78.2

%

Cash dividends declared per share (2) 

 

$

0.145

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.565

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.16

 

 


(1)      Represents historical financial data of our operating partnership, including three additional facilities acquired by our operating partnership from certain of the Amsdell Entities in connection with the IPO.

(2)          Prior to the IPO, management fees to related parties were paid to U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., the prior manager of our self-storage facilities that was acquired at the time of our IPO.

(3)Excludes 5,198,855 operating partnership units issued at our IPO and in connection with the acquisition of facilities subsequent to our IPO.  Operating partnership units have been excluded from the earnings per share calculations as there would be no effect on the earnings per share since, upon conversion,related income or loss is presented in Noncontrolling interests in the minority interests’ share of income would also be added back to net income.Operating Partnership.

 

(4)(2)          The Company announced a pro rata dividend of $0.2009 per common share on November 24, 2004, full quarterly dividends of $0.28 per common share on March 2, 2005; May 31, 2005 and August 24, 2005 and dividends of $0.29 per common share on December 1, 2005;2005, February 22, 2006;2006, April 24, 2006;2006, August 23, 2006;2006, November 3, 2006;2006, February 21, 2007;2007, May 8, 2007;2007, and August 14, 2007;  and a dividenddividends of $0.18 per common share on December 13, 2007.2007,  February 27, 2008,  May 7, 2008, and August 6, 2008; dividends of $0.025 per common share on December 11, 2008, January 22, 2009, April 22, 2009, July 22, 2009, October 22, 2009, December 5, 2009, February 24, 2010, June 2, 2010, and August 4, 2010; and dividends of $0.07 per common share on December 14, 2010.

 

(5)35          For the period from October 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004, amount includes a one-time management contract termination charge of approximately $22.2 million related to the termination of our management contracts as a result of the purchase of U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co. and approximately $7.0 million of expenses related to the early extinguishment of debt at the time of our IPO. Additionally, for the period from October 21, 2004 through December 31, 2004, general and administrative expense includes a one-time compensation charge of approximately $2.4 million for deferred shares granted to certain members of our senior management team in connection with our IPO.

35



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.  The Company makes certain statements in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws.  For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements, see the section in this report entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.”  Certain risk factors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the following discussion.  For a discussion of such risk factors, see the section in this report entitled “Risk Factors.”

 

Overview

On October 27, 2004, the Company completed its IPO, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 28,750,000 common shares (including 3,750,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) at an offering price of $16.00 per share. The IPO resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of $460.0 million. On October 7, 2005, the Company completed a follow-on public offering, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 19,665,000 common shares (including 2,565,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) at an offering price of $20.35 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $400.2 million.

 

The Company is an integrated self-storage real estate company, which means that it has in-house capabilities in the operation, design, development, leasing, and acquisition of self-storage facilities.  The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal tax purposes.  At December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, the Company owned 409363 and 399367 self-storage facilities, respectively, totaling approximately 26.123.6 million and 25.423.7 million rentable square feet, respectively.  In addition, as of December 31, 2010, the Company managed 93 properties for third parties, bringing the total number of properties which it owned and/or managed to 456.

 

The Company derives revenues principally from rents received from its customers who rent units at its self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases.  Therefore, our operating results depend materially on our ability to retain our existing customers and lease our available self-storage units to new customers while maintaining and, where possible, increasing our pricing levels.  In addition, our operating results depend on the ability of our customers to make required rental payments to us.  We believe that ourhave a decentralized approach to the management and operation of our facilities, which places an emphasis on local, market level oversight and control,control.  We believe this approach allows us to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local market conditions, where appropriate increasing rents while maintainingand to maximize revenues by managing rental rates and occupancy levels, or increasing occupancy levels while maintaining pricing levels.

 

The Company typically experiences minor seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which are generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

 

The United States has recently experienced an economic downturn that has resulted in higher unemployment, stagnant employment growth, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets.  Our results of operations may be sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures.  A continuation of ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services.  A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

In the future, the Company intends to focus on increasing ourmaximizing internal growth opportunities and selectively pursuing targeted acquisitions and developments of self-storage facilities.  We intend to incur additional debt in connection with any such future acquisitions or developments.

 

The Company has one reportable operating segment:  we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.

 

The Company’s self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan and rural areas and have numerous tenants per facility.  No single tenant represents 1% or morea significant concentration of our revenues.  The facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided approximately 19%18%, 15%, 8%10% and 7%, respectively, of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007.2010.

 

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report.  Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report.  A summary of significant accounting policies is also provided in the notes to our consolidated financial statements (See Note 2 to the consolidated

36



Table of Contents

financial statements).  These policies require the application of judgment and assumptions by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.  Due to this uncertainty, actual results could differ materially from estimates calculated and utilized by management.

 

36



Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company, and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries.  The portion of these entities not owned by the operatingCompany is presented as noncontrolling interests as of and during the periods presented.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) on the consolidation of VIEs.  When an entity is not deemed to be a VIE, the Company considers the provisions of additional FASB guidance to determine whether a general partner, or the general partners as a group, controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights.  The Company consolidates (i) entities that are VIEs and of which the wholly-owned subsidiaries ofCompany is deemed to be the operating partnership. primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs which the Company control s and which the limited partners do not have the ability to dissolve or remove the Company without cause nor substantive participating rights.

For analytical presentation, all percentages are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Self-Storage Facilities

 

The Company records self-storage facilities at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation on the buildings and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 40 years. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized.  Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

 

When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values.  When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.  Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

 

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities.  Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts.  Accordingly, to date no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles.  To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenant relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant tenants and the average tenant turnover is fairly frequent. While intangible assets for in-place leases have not historically been recorded,

During 2008, the Company recordedacquired a $6.8self storage facility and allocated approximately $1.0 million to the intangible value of the in-place leases.  This asset to recognizerepresents the value of in-place leases at the time of acquisition and was fully amortized at December 31, 2009.

On April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which includes the intangible value related to its acquisitionthe management contracts as other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  The average estimated life of 14the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.9 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States.   In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.  The estimated life of these in-place leases is 12 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during the third quarter2010 was approximately $0.7 million.

37



Table of 2007.Contents

 

Long-lived assets classified as “held for use” are reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances such as declines in occupancy and operating results indicate that there may be an impairment.  The carrying valuesvalue of these long-lived assets areis compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets. Anassets to determine if the property’s basis is recoverable.  If a property’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded ifto the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value based on its undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the asset and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the real estate asset may not be recoverable.value.  The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.  The Company recorded an assetThere were no impairment charge of $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 related to hurricane damage (See Note 17 to the Consolidatedlosses recognized in accordance with these procedures during 2010, 2009 and Combined Financial Statements) and impairment charges totaling $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, related to fire and flood damage.2008.

 

The Company considers long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

 

Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant asset is under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing.  In most transactions, these contingencies are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; and, accordingly, the facility is not identified as held for sale until the closing actually occurs. However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances.  Properties classified as held for sale are reported at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Management has determined that all our leases with tenants are operating leases.  Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the lease agreements or contracts, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues

The Company recognizes gains on disposition of properties only upon closing in accordance with the guidance on sales of real estate.  Payments received from long-term operating leasespurchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits.  Profit on real estate sold is recognized on a straight-line basis overusing the termfull accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the lease. The excesssales price is reasonably assured and the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale.  Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of rents recognized over

37



amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in deferred revenue, and contractually due but unpaid rents are included in other assets.profit recognition on sales under this guidance.

 

Share Based Payments

 

We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our equity incentive plans.  Accordingly, share compensation expense was recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options.  The Company has elected to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period. Additionally, certain restricted share units awarded to our former Chief Executive Officer in 2005 were scheduled to vest immediately upon his retirement from the Company as he had reached the retirement age set forth in his award agreement. Accordingly, share compensation expense related to this issuance was expensed fully in 2005.

MinorityNoncontrolling Interests

 

AsNoncontrolling interests are the portion of September 30, 2005,equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests.  In accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company recordedand noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, i ncluding beginning balances, activity for the operating partnership units issued in connectionperiod and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.

38



Table of Contents

Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code beginning with the National Self Storage transaction as conditionally redeemable asperiod from October 21, 2004 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2004.  In management’s opinion, the result of a special redemption right (see Note 4 and Note 7requirements to maintain these elections are being met.  Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements)statements other than for operations conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and the allocation of net income and loss for financial versus tax reporting purposes.

The Company is subject to a discussion4% federal excise tax if sufficient taxable income is not distributed within prescribed time limits.  The excise tax equals 4% of the National Self Storage transaction). On October 25, 2005,annual amount, if any, by which the sellers insum of (a) 85% of the National Self Storage transaction agreed to terminateCompany’s ordinary income and (b) 95% of the Special Redemption Right, effective as of July 15, 2005 (the first date on which National Self Storage facilities were acquiredCompany’s net capital gain exceeds cash distributions and certain taxes paid by the operating partnership under the purchase agreement). From the issuance date until October 25, 2005, the Company elected to accrete changes in the redemption value of the National Self Storage units issued over the period from the date of issuance to the earliest redemption date (one year from the date of initial issuance) on a pro rata basis. Upon termination of the Special Redemption Right, the Company classified these units in minority interest. The amount of accretion recorded through October 25, 2005 was approximately $3.0 million. Effective October 26, 2005, minority interest represents issued and outstanding operating partnership units.Company.

Minority Interests include income allocated to holders of the operating partnership units. Income is allocated to the minority interests based on their ownership percentage of the operating partnership. This ownership percentage, as well as the total net assets of the operating partnership, changes when additional common shares or operating partnership units are issued. Such changes result in an allocation between shareholders’ equity and Minority Interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due to the number of such capital transactions that occur each period, we have presented a single net effect of all such allocations for the period as the “Adjustment for Minority Interest in Operating Partnership” in our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Owners’ Equity (Deficit) (rather than separately allocating the minority interest for each individual capital transaction).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2007,The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assetsin June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statemententity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets.  It also eliminates the concept of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“FAS 141(R)a “qualifying special-purpose entity,).  FAS 141(R) establishes principles and changes the requirements for recognizing identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, goodwill acquired in the combination or the gain from a bargain purchase, and disclosure requirements.  Under this revised statement, all costs incurred to effect an acquisition will be recognized separately from the acquisition.  Also, restructuring costs that are expected but the acquirer is not obligated to incur will be recognized separately from the acquisition.  FAS 141(R) is effective for the Company beginning with its quarter ending March 31, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidatedderecognizing financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“FAS 160”).  FAS 160 requires that ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent are clearly identified.  In addition, it requires that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the income statement.  FAS 160 is effective for the Company beginning with its quarter ending March 31, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.

38



This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. This statement clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This statement is effective in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.requires additional disclosures.  The Company believes that the adoption of this standard on January 1, 2008 willapplication did not have a material effectan impact on our consolidated financial statements.position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In June 2006, theThe FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertaintyauthoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in Income Taxes,June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”).  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized inentity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s financial statements and prescribesability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.  The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a recognition threshold and measurement attribute forcompany is the financial statement recognition and measurementprimary beneficiary of a tax position taken or expectedvariable interest entity.  It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to be taken in a tax return.  FIN 48 also provides guidance on description, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007.that involvement.  The adoption of FIN 48 in 2007application did not have a material effectan impact on theour consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments — An Amendmentposit ion, results of FASB Nos. 133 and 140.  The purpose of SFAS No. 155 is to simplify the accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments by permitting fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation.  SFAS No. 155 also eliminates the restriction on passive derivative instruments that a qualifying special-purpose entity may hold.  SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquiredoperations or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after September 15, 2006.  The adoption of SFAS No. 155 in 2007 did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.cash flows.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following discussion of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto.  Historical results set forth in the consolidated statements of operations reflect only the existing facilities and should not be taken as indicative of future operations.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006(not including discontinued operations)

Acquisition and Development Activities

The comparability of the Company’s results of operations is significantly affected by acquisition activities in 2007 and 2006 as listed below. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company owned 409 and 399 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.

·     In 2007, 17 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $140.5 million (the “2007 Acquisitions”).

·     In 2007, 5 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $19.2 million (the “2007 Dispositions”).

·     In 2006, 60 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $362.4 million (the “2006 Acquisitions”).

39



A comparison of net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

REVENUES

 

(in thousands)

 

Rental income

 

$

211,974

 

$

195,331

 

Other property related income

 

16,828

 

14,816

 

Other - related party

 

365

 

457

 

Total revenues

 

229,167

 

210,604

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

96,802

 

85,415

 

Property operating expenses - related party

 

59

 

69

 

Depreciation

 

70,192

 

64,079

 

Asset write-off

 

 

305

 

Lease abandonment

 

1,316

 

 

General and administrative

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

General and administrative - related party

 

337

 

613

 

Total operating expenses

 

190,672

 

172,156

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

38,495

 

38,448

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

Write-off of loan procurement cost due to
early extinguishment of debt

 

 

(1,907

)

Interest income

 

401

 

1,336

 

Other

 

118

 

191

 

Total other expense

 

(55,361

)

(47,980

)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

$

(16,866

)

$

(9,532

)

Total Revenues

Rental income increased from $195.3 million in 2006 to $211.9 million in 2007, an increase of $16.6 million, or 8%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) additional rental income from the 2007 Acquisitions, (ii) a full year contribution from the 2006 Acquisitions, and (iii) an increase in rental income from our pool of same-store facilities of approximately $3.0 million resulting from rate increases and an increase in average occupancy from 81.2% to 81.7%.

Other property related income, including Other – related party, increased from $15.3 million in 2006 to $17.2 million in 2007, an increase of $1.9 million, or 12%. This increase is primarily attributable to the other property income from the 2007 Acquisitions and a full year contribution from the 2006 Acquisitions.

Total Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses, including property operating expenses – related party, increased from $85.5 million in 2006 to $96.9 million in 2007, an increase of $11.4 million, or 13%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) additional operating expenses from the 2007 Acquisitions, (ii) a full year of operating expenses from the 2006 Acquisitions, and (iii) an increase in repair and maintenance expenses of $1.2 million as part of the Company’s effort to address deferred maintenance items during 2007.

General and administrative expenses, including General and administrative expenses – related party, remained unchanged at $22.3 million.  The 2006 period includes approximately $2.7 million of severance costs related to a Company restructuring of certain management positions; the 2007 period includes approximately $1.2 million of non-recurring legal and professional costs associated with the litigation and related settlement with the Amsdells.

40



Depreciation increased from $64.1 million in 2006 to $70.1 million in 2007, an increase of $6.0 million, or 9%. The increase is primarily attributable to additional depreciation expense related to the 2007 Acquisitions and a full year of depreciation expense related to the 2006 Acquisitions.

Asset write-off of $0.3 million represents the disposal of the Company’s former point of sale system, which was replaced with CentershiftTM in the third quarter of 2006.

In August 2007, the Company abandoned certain office space in Cleveland, OH that was previously used for its corporate offices.  The related leases have expiration dates ranging from December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2014. Upon vacating the space, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement with a sub-tenant to lease the majority of the space for the duration of the term.  As a result of this exit activity, the Company recognized a “Lease abandonment charge” of $1.3 million during 2007.

Total Other Expenses

Interest expense increased from $45.6 million in 2006 to $54.1 million in 2007, an increase of $8.5 million, or 19%. The increase is attributable to a higher amount of outstanding debt in 2007 primarily resulting from the financing of the 2007 Acquisitions, which was primarily funded through the revolving credit facility and secured term loan.  An additional source of the increase is a full year of interest expense related to debt assumed in conjunction with the 2006 Acquisitions.

Loan procurement amortization expense decreased from $2.0 million in 2006 to $1.8 million in 2007, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 10%.  The decrease is attributable to the repayment of five mortgages during 2007.

In conjunction with the two revolving credit facility financings during 2006, the Company incurred charges of $1.9 million relating to the write-off of unamortized loan procurement costs.

Interest income decreased to $0.4 million in 2007 from $1.3 million in 2006. This decrease is primarily attributable to the Company’s investment of excess proceeds from the 2005 follow-on public offering in interest bearing accounts and in short-term marketable securities until the excess proceeds were used to fund acquisitions or pay down existing debt during the first quarter of 2006.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2006 and 2005(not including discontinued operations)

Acquisition and Development Activities

The comparability of the Company’s results of operations is significantly affected by acquisition activities in 2006 and 2005. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company owned 399 and 339 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.

In 2006, 60 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $362.4 million (the “2006 Acquisitions”).

In 2005, 146 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $547.9 million. During 2005, four self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $6.2 million, and accordingly results of operations for these facilities have been accounted for as discontinued operations. The Company also reduced its reported number of facilities during 2005 by consolidating four facilities into existing adjacent facilities.  Based upon total acquisitions, dispositions and consolidations, the Company had a net increase of 138 facilities in 2005 (the “2005 Acquisitions”).

41



A comparison of net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

REVENUES

 

(in thousands)

 

Rental income

 

$

195,331

 

$

135,169

 

Other property related income

 

14,816

 

10,001

 

Other - related party

 

457

 

405

 

Total revenues

 

210,604

 

145,575

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

85,415

 

54,793

 

Property operating expenses - related party

 

69

 

43

 

Depreciation

 

64,079

 

39,479

 

Asset write-off

 

305

 

 

General and administrative

 

21,675

 

17,786

 

General and administrative - related party

 

613

 

736

 

Total operating expenses

 

172,156

 

112,837

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

38,448

 

32,738

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(45,628

)

(31,907

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(1,972

)

(2,045

)

Write-off of loan procurement cost due to
early extinguishment of debt

 

(1,907

)

(93

)

Interest income

 

1,336

 

2,404

 

Other

 

191

 

(47

)

Total other expense

 

(47,980

)

(31,688

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

$

(9,532

)

$

1,050

 

Total Revenues

Rental income increased from $135.2 million in 2005 to $195.3 million in 2006, an increase of $60.2 million, or 45%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) additional rental income from the 2006 Acquisitions, (ii) a full year contribution from the 2005 Acquisitions, and (iii) an increase in rental income from our pool of same-store facilities of approximately $4.6 million.

Other property related income, including Other – related party, increased from $10.4 million in 2005 to $15.3 million in 2006, an increase of $4.9 million, or 47%. This increase is primarily attributable to the other property income from the 2006 Acquisitions and a full year contribution from the 2005 Acquisitions.

Total Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses, including Property operating expenses – related party, increased from $54.8 million in 2005 to $85.5 million in 2006, an increase of $30.6 million, or 56%. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) additional operating expenses from the 2006 Acquisitions, (ii) a full year of operating expenses from the 2005 Acquisitions, and (iii) an increase in operating expenses from our “same-store” facilities of approximately $5.7 million.

General and administrative, including General and administrative – related party, expenses increased from $18.5 million in 2005 to $22.3 million in 2006, an increase of $3.8 million, or 20.5%.  The increase is primarily attributable to (i) approximately $2.7 million of severance costs during 2006, (ii) approximately $0.4 million related to the settlement of a claim made based on actions taken by the Predecessor Company prior to the initial public offering, and (iii) $0.2 million related to professional fees incurred in 2006 related to reorganization.

42



Depreciation increased from $39.5 million in 2005 to $64.1 million in 2006, an increase of $24.6 million, or 62%. The increase is primarily attributable to additional depreciation expense related to the 2006 Acquisitions and a full year of depreciation expense related to the 2005 Acquisitions.

Asset write-off in 2006 of $0.3 million represents the disposal of the Company’s former point of sale system, which was replaced with CentershiftTM in the fourth quarter of 2006.

Total Other Expenses

Interest expense increased from $31.9 million in 2005 to $45.6 million in 2006, an increase of $13.7 million, or 43%. The increase is attributable to a higher amount of outstanding debt in 2006 primarily resulting from the financing of certain of the 2006 Acquisitions with additional borrowings.

In conjunction with the two revolving credit facility financings during 2006, the Company incurred charges of $1.9 million relating to the write-off of unamortized loan procurement costs.

Interest income decreased to $1.3 million in 2006 from $2.4 million in 2005. This decrease is primarily attributable to the Company’s 2005 follow-on public offering.  The Company invested excess proceeds from the follow-on offering in interest bearing accounts and in short-term marketable securities until the excess proceeds were used to fund acquisitions or pay down existing debt during the first quarter of 2006.

Impact of Hurricanes

As a result of hurricanes that occurred during the third quarter of 2005, the Company incurred damage at certain of its self-storage facilities located in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), the Company determined that there were indicators of impairment and accordingly tested the assets for recoverability. After an assessment of the damage sustained at the Waveland, Mississippi facility, the Company determined that a charge for impairment of approximately $2.3 million was required because the estimated undiscounted future cash flows did not support the carrying value of the assets. The Company expected that insurance proceeds from its comprehensive insurance for property damage would cover the entire loss incurred, and in 2005 appropriately recorded the impairment charge and an offsetting insurance recovery of $2.3 million, of which $0.5 million was received in October 2005. The related insurance receivable was included in other assets as of December 31, 2005, and the asset impairment charge and related insurance recovery were presented net in operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005.  During 2006, insurance proceeds were sufficient to satisfy the insurance receivable and no balance remained as of December 31, 2007.

Same-Store Facility Results

The Company considers its same-store portfolio to consist of only those facilities owned and operated on a stabilized basis at the beginning and at the end of the applicable periodsyears presented. The following same-store presentation isSame-store results are considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance because it provides information relating to changes in facility-level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions, developments or dispositions. The following table sets forth operating data for our same-store portfolio for the periods presented.

 

43The Company’s results of operations are affected by the acquisition and disposition activity during the 2010, 2009, and 2008 periods as listed below.  At December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the Company owned 363, 367, and 387 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.

·In 2010, 12 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $85.1 million (the “2010 Acquisitions”) and 16 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $38.1 million (the “2010 Dispositions”).

·In 2009, 20 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $90.9 million (the “2009 Dispositions”).

·In 2008, one self-storage facility was acquired for approximately $13.3 million (the “2008 Acquisition”) and 23 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $62.0 million (the “2008 Dispositions”).

39



Table of Contents

 

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20072010 to the Year Ended December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands)2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

192,739

 

$

193,383

 

$

(644

)

0

%

$

2,618

 

$

1,207

 

$

 

$

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

767

 

0

%

Other property related income

 

16,854

 

15,654

 

1,200

 

8

%

1,190

 

432

 

596

 

 

18,640

 

16,086

 

2,554

 

16

%

Property management fee income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,829

 

56

 

2,829

 

56

 

2,773

 

4952

%

Total revenues

 

209,593

 

209,037

 

556

 

0

%

3,808

 

1,639

 

3,425

 

56

 

216,826

 

210,732

 

6,094

 

3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

82,179

 

82,835

 

(656

)

-1

%

2,258

 

972

 

9,259

 

7,573

 

93,696

 

91,380

 

2,316

 

3

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

127,414

 

126,202

 

1,212

 

1

%

1,550

 

667

 

(5,834

)

(7,517

)

123,130

 

119,352

 

3,778

 

3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,945

 

69,125

 

(6,180

)

-9

%

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

2,837

 

13

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88,351

 

91,694

 

(3,343

)

-4

%

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,779

 

27,658

 

7,121

 

26

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(37,794

)

(45,269

)

7,475

 

-17

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

(4,124

)

176

%

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

621

 

681

 

(60

)

-9

%

Acquisition related costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(759

)

 

(759

)

100

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(235

)

(33

)

(202

)

612

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(44,630

)

(46,960

)

2,330

 

-5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,851

)

(19,302

)

9,451

 

49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

(2,825

)

-58

%

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

(12,313

)

-87

%

Total discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

(15,138

)

-80

%

NET LOSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

(5,687

)

-1713

%

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

381

 

60

 

321

 

535

%

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

(1,090

)

-164

%

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

(6,456

)

-689

%

The following table provides information pertaining to our Same-Store portfolio for 2007 and 2006:

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Properties

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same Store Property Portfolio

 

Acquired

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

173,409

 

$

170,103

 

$

3,306

 

2%

 

$

38,564

 

$

25,181

 

$

1

 

$

47

 

$

211,974

 

$

195,331

 

$

16,643

 

9

%

Other property related income

 

13,301

 

12,653

 

648

 

5%

 

3,299

 

2,150

 

228

 

13

 

16,828

 

14,816

 

2,012

 

14

 %

Other — related party

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

365

 

457

 

365

 

457

 

(92

-20

 %

Total revenues

 

186,710

 

182,756

 

3,954

 

2%

 

41,863

 

27,331

 

594

 

517

 

229,167

 

210,604

 

18,563

 

9

%

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

72,010

 

69,262

 

2,748

 

4%

 

17,753

 

10,384

 

7,039

 

5,769

 

96,802

 

85,415

 

11,387

 

13

%

Property operating expenses — related party

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

59

 

69

 

59

 

69

 

(10

)

-14

%

Subtotal

 

72,010

 

69,262

 

2,748

 

4%

 

17,753

 

10,384

 

7,098

 

5,838

 

96,861

 

85,484

 

11,377

 

13

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

114,700

 

113,494

 

1,206

 

1%

 

24,110

 

16,947

 

(6,504

)

(5,321

)

132,306

 

125,120

 

7,186

 

6

%

Depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

70,192

 

64,079

 

6,113

 

10

%

Asset write-off

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

305

 

(305

)

-100

%

Lease bandonment charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,316

 

 

1,316

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

291

 

1

%

General and administrative — related party

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

337

 

613

 

(276

)

-45

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

93,811

 

86,672

 

7,139

 

8

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,495

 

38,448

 

47

 

0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

(8,480

)

19

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

200

 

-10

%

Write-off of loan procurement due to early extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,907

)

(1907)

 

100

%

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

401

 

1,336

 

(935

)

-70

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

191

 

(73

)

-38

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(55,361

)

(47,980

)

(7,381

)

15

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(16,866

)

(9,532

)

(7,334

)

77

%

MINORITY INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,385

 

790

 

595

 

75

%

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(15,481

)

(8,742

)

(6,739

)

77

%

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

 

208

 

(106

)

-51

%

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,517

 

 

2,517

 

 

Minority interest attributable to discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(215

)

(17

)

(198

)

1165

%

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,404

 

191

 

2,213

 

1159

%

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

$

(4,526

)

53

%

Same-store revenuesRental income increased from $182.8$194.6 million in 20062009 to $186.7$195.4 million in 2007,2010, an increase of $3.9$0.8 million. This increase is primarily attributable to additional income from the 2010 acquisitions of approximately $1.6 million in 2010 with no similar income in 2009, offset by a decrease in the realized annual rent per square foot of 1% related to the same-store property portfolio which resulted in a $0.6 million decrease in same-store rental income.

Other property related income increased from $16.1 million in 2009 to $18.6 million in 2010, an increase of $2.5 million, or 2%16%Same-storeThis increase is primarily attributable to increased fee revenue and insurance commissions related to the same-store properties of $1.3 million and an increase in other property related income of $1.4 million related to the 2010 Acquisitions and other non-same store revenue during 2010 as compared to 2009.

Property management fee income increased to $2.8 million in 2010 from $56,000 during 2009, an increase of $2.8 million.  This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business, which included 93 facilities as of December 31, 2010 compared to eight facilities as of December 31, 2009.

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased from $69.3$91.4 million in 20062009 to $72.0$93.7 million in 2007,2010, an increase of $2.7$2.3 million, or 3%.  This increase is primarily attributable to $1.3 million of increased expenses associated with non same-store properties and additional costs incurred to support the growth of the third party management business, offset by a $0.7 million decrease in same-store expenses primarily attributable to a $0.5 million decrease in real estate tax expense in the 2010 as compared to 2009.

40



Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization decreased from $69.1 million in 2009 to $62.9 million in 2010, a decrease of $6.2 million, or 9%.  This decrease is primarily attributable to depreciation expense recognized in 2009 related to assets that became fully depreciated during 2009, with no similar activity on these fully depreciated assets in 2010.

General and administrative expenses increased from $22.6 million in 2009 to $25.4 million in 2010, an increase of $2.8 million, or 13%.  This increase is primarily attributable to costs related to additional personnel costs during 2010 to support operational functions of the Company as well as non-recurring contract related costs incurred in conjunction with amendments to employment agreements with members of our senior management.

Other Income (Expenses)

Interest expense decreased from $45.3 million in 2009 to $37.8 million in 2010, a decrease of $7.5 million, or 17%.  Approximately $3.9 million of the reduced interest expense related to $175 million of net mortgage loan repayments during the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010.   Interest expense also decreased by approximately $3.6 million as a result of reduced average outstanding credit facility borrowings and lower interest rates during 2010 as compared to 2009.

Loan procurement amortization expense increased from $2.3 million in 2009 to $6.5 million in 2010, an increase of $4.2 million, or 176%.  The increase is attributable to the amortization of additional costs incurred in relation to the amendment of the credit facility in 2010, and a full year of amortization of costs related to the credit facility and the 17 secured financings entered into in 2009.

Acquisition related costs increased $0.8 million during 2010 with no comparable costs in 2009 as a result of the acquisition of 12 self-storage facilities, in addition to the acquisition of 85 management contracts from United Stor-All, during 2010, compared to no acquisition activity during 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Gains on disposition of discontinued operations decreased from $14.1 million in the 2009 period to $1.8 million in the 2010 period, a decrease of $12.3 million. Gains during 2009 related to the sale of the 20 assets sold during 2009, and gains during 2010 related to the 16 assets sold during 2010.

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries increased to $1.8 million in the 2010 period from $0.7 million in the 2009 period.  This increase is primarily a result of a full year of activity related to the operations of a joint venture (“HART”), which was formed in August 2009 to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities.  The Company retained a 50% ownership interest in HART and accordingly presents the 50% of the related results that are allocated to the venture partner as an adjustment to net income (loss) when arriving at net income (loss) attributable to shareholders.

41



Table of Contents

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

 

190,343

 

$

198,659

 

$

(8,316

)

-4

%

$

 

4,247

 

$

3,541

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

$

(7,610

)

-4

%

Other property related income

 

15,362

 

14,773

 

589

 

4

%

724

 

357

 

 

 

16,086

 

15,130

 

956

 

6

%

Property management fee income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

 

56

 

 

56

 

100

%

Total revenues

 

205,705

 

213,432

 

(7,727

)

-4

%

4,971

 

3,898

 

56

 

 

210,732

 

217,330

 

(6,598

)

-3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

81,432

 

82,486

 

(1,054

)

-1

%

2,405

 

2,064

 

7,543

 

7,983

 

91,380

 

92,533

 

(1,153

)

-1

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

124,273

 

130,946

 

(6,673

)

-5

%

2,566

 

1,834

 

(7,487

)

(7,983

)

119,352

 

124,797

 

(5,445

)

-4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,125

 

71,974

 

(2,849

)

-4

%

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,569

 

24,964

 

(2,395

)

-10

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91,694

 

96,938

 

(5,244

)

-5

%

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,658

 

27,859

 

(201

)

-1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(45,269

)

(52,014

)

6,745

 

-13

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,339

)

(1,929

)

(410

)

21

%

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

681

 

153

 

528

 

345

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33

)

94

 

(127

)

-135

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(46,960

)

(53,696

)

6,736

 

-13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,302

)

(25,837

)

6,535

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

(4,388

)

-48

%

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

(5,581

)

-28

%

Total discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

(9,969

)

-34

%

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(332

)

3,102

 

(3,434

)

-111

%

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

(310

)

370

 

119

%

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(665

)

 

(665

)

-100

%

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(3,729

)

-134

%

Revenues

Rental income decreased from $202.2 million in 2008 to $194.6 million in 2009, a decrease of $7.6 million, or 4%.  This increase wasdecrease is primarily attributable to slight increasesa decrease of rental income from the same-store properties of $8.3 million due to decreased realized rent per occupied square foot of 4.9% during 2009 as compared to 2008, offset by an increase in multiplerental income of $0.7 million from non same-store properties.

Other property related income increased from $15.1 million in 2008 to $16.1 million in 2009, an increase of $1.0 million, or 6%.  This increase is primarily attributable to increased insurance commissions and merchandise sales of $1.0 million across the portfolio of storage facilities during 2009 as compared to 2008.

Property management fee income increased to $56,000 during 2009 with no comparable income during 2008.  This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business, which began in 2009 and included eight facilities as of December 31, 2009.

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses decreased from $92.5 million in 2008 to $91.4 million in 2009, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 1%.  $1.1 million of the decrease is attributable to a same-store expense line items.decline primarily related to a $0.4 million decrease in repairs and maintenance expense and a $0.4 million decrease in utility expenses.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from $72.0 million in 2008 to $69.1 million in 2009, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 4%.  The decrease is primarily attributable to amortization expense of $6.8 million incurred during 2008 related to two in-place lease intangible assets acquired in conjunction with property acquisitions during 2008 and 2007, with

42



Table of Contents

no similar activity during 2009; offset by additional depreciation expense during 2009 of $3.9 million as compared to 2008 related to capital improvements during 2008 and 2009.

General and administrative expenses decreased from $25.0 million in 2008 to $22.6 million in 2009, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 10%.  This decrease is primarily attributable to $2.1 million in severance related costs incurred during 2008 that the Company did not incur during 2009.

Other Income (Expenses)

Interest expense decreased from $52.0 million in 2008 to $45.3 million in 2009, a decrease of $6.7 million, or 13%.  The decrease is attributable to lower interest rates on borrowings under the Company’s bank term loan and credit facility as well as lower outstanding borrowings on the credit facility during 2009 as compared to 2008.

Loan procurement amortization expense increased from $1.9 million in 2008 to $2.3 million in 2009, an increase of $0.4 million, or 21%.  The increase is attributable to additional costs incurred in relation to the company’s new credit facility and 17 secured financings entered into in 2009.

Interest income increased to $0.7 million in 2009 from $0.2 million in 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to interest income earned on proceeds from the secondary offering completed in August 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Gains on disposition of discontinued operations decreased from $19.7 million in 2008 to $14.1 million in 2009, a decrease of $5.6 million, as a result of the sale of 23 assets during the 2008 period as compared to 20 asset sales during the 2009 period.

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

NOI

 

We define net operating income, which we refer to as “NOI,” as total continuing revenues less continuing property operating expenses.  NOI also can be calculated by adding back to net income:income (loss):  interest expense on loans, loan procurement amortization expense, early extinguishment of debt, minority interest,acquisition related costs, amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, other expense, depreciation and amortization expense, lease abandonment charge, and general and administrative general and administrative-related party and lease abandonment charge;expense; and deducting from net income: income from discontinued operations, gains on saledisposition of self-storage facilitiesdiscontinued operations, other income, and interest income.  NOI is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP.

 

We use NOI as a measure of operating performance at each of our facilities, and for all of our facilities in the aggregate. NOI should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows provided by operating, investing and financing activities, or other income statement or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

 

We believe NOI is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because:

 

44



·         It is one of the primary measures used by our management and our facility managers to evaluate the economic productivity of our facilities, including our ability to lease our facilities, increase pricing and occupancy and control our property operating expenses;

 

·         It is widely used in the real estate industry and the self-storage industry to measure the performance and value of real estate assets without regard to various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary depending upon accounting methods and the book value of assets; and

 

·         We believe it helps our investors to meaningfully compare the results of our operating performance from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense on our outstanding indebtedness) and depreciation of our basis in our assets from our operating results.

43



Table of Contents

 

There are material limitations to using a measure such as NOI, including the difficulty associated with comparing results among more than one company and the inability to analyze certain significant items, including depreciation and interest expense, that directly affect our net income.  We compensate for these limitations by considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently as well as in connection with our analysis of net income.  NOI should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, such as total revenues, operating income and net income.

Cash Flows

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20072010 to the Year Ended December 31, 20092006

 

A comparison of cash flow provided byrelated to operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20072010 and 20062009 is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Change

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Change

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

62.9

 

$

64.6

 

$

(1.7

)

 

$

71,517

 

$

62,214

 

$

9,303

 

Investing activities

 

$

(153.6

)

$

(248.0

)

$

94.4

 

 

$

(44,783

)

$

98,852

 

$

(143,635

)

Financing activities

 

$

75.5

 

$

104.3

 

$

(28.8

)

 

$

(123,611

)

$

(62,042

)

$

(61,569

)

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $71.5 million and $62.2 million, respectively, an increase of $9.3 million.  The increase primarily relates to timing differences associated with a $3.2 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expense activity and a $3.9 million decrease in restricted cash activity during 2010 as compared to 2009 and increased NOI levels during 2010 as compared to 2009.

 

Cash provided by operations(used in) investing activities decreased from $64.6$98.9 million in 20062009 to $62.9($44.8) million in 2007, an2010, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 3%.$143.6 million.  The decrease is primarily attributablerelates to decreased property dispositions in 2010 (aggregate proceeds of $37.3 million related to 16 facilities) compared to 2009 (aggregate proceeds of $68.3 million related to 20 facilities), net proceeds received from the increaseformation of YSI HART Limited Partnership in certain prepaid assets, which is a resultAugust 2009 of the timingapproximately $48.7 million, with no similar transactions during 2010, as well as higher acquisition activity in 2010 (12 facilities for an aggregate cost of certain expenditures.$84.7 million) relative to no acquisitions during 2009.  The decrease was offset by repayment of notes receivable of $20.1 million during 2010.

 

Cash used in investingfinancing activities decreasedincreased from $248.0$62.0 million in 20062009 to $153.6$123.6 million in 2007, a decrease2010, an increase of $94.4$61.6 million. The increase primarily relates to higher common share issuance activity in 2009 compared to 2010 (proceeds of $170.9 million or 38%. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily attributableand $47.6 million, respectively), and increased distributions paid to $349.8shareholders, and non-controlling interests of $5.9 million used in the 2006 Acquisitions offset by the $169.8 million used in the 2007 Acquisitions.  Additionally, the net proceeds from sales of marketable securities in 2006 resulted in $95.1 million while the property dispositions in 2007 provided $17.9 million.

Cash provided by financing activities decreased from $104.3 million in 2006 to $75.5 million in 2007, a decrease of $28.8 million, or 28%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the net additional borrowings during 2006 of $176.4 million2010 as compared to the2009 due to additional outstanding shares during 2010, offset by decreased net additional borrowings during 2007debt repayments of $150.6 million.  This fluctuation is a result$54.8 million and loan procurement costs of the 2006 Acquisition activity.$12.6 million in 2010 as compared to 2009.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20062009 to the Year Ended December 31, 20082005

 

A comparison of cash flow related to operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20062009 and 20052008 is as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

2009

 

2008

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

62,214

 

$

67,012

 

$

(4,798

)

Investing activities

 

$

98,852

 

$

27,177

 

$

71,675

 

Financing activities

 

$

(62,042

)

$

(94,962

)

$

32,920

 

45

44



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Change

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

64.6

 

$

46.1

 

$

18.5

 

Investing activities

 

$

(248.0

)

$

(489.1

)

$

241.1

 

Financing activities

 

$

104.3

 

$

516.5

 

$

(412.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $62.2 million and $67.0 million, respectively, a decrease of $4.8 million.  The decrease primarily relates to reduced levels of net operating income in 2009 as compared to 2008 and a $1.0 million decrease in other assets during 2009 as compared to 2008 as a result of the timing of certain payments, offset by a $2.4 million reduction in general and administrative expenses during 2009 as compared to 2008.

 

Cash provided by operations increased from $46.1investing activities was $98.9 million in 2005 to $64.6for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $27.2 million in 2006,for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $18.5 million, or 40.1%.$71.7 million.  The increase is primarily attributablerelates to increased proceeds from property dispositions of $11.4 million in 2009 as compared to 2008; net proceeds received from the incremental impactclosing of the 60 self-storage facilities acquireda joint venture in 2006.August 2009 of approximately $48.7 million with no similar transactions during 2008; as well as higher acquisition activity in 2008 (one facility for a purchase price of $13.3 million) relative to 2009 (no facility acquisition activity).

 

Cash used in investing activities decreased from $489.1 million in 2005 to $248.0 million in 2006, a decrease of $241.1 million, or 49.3%. The decrease in cash used in investing activities is primarily attributable to cash used to acquire 146 self-storage facilities in 2005 of $381.1 million versus cash used to acquire 60 self-storage facilities in 2006 of $312.3 as well as the use of $125.0 million of cash in 2005 to invest in marketable securities.

Cash provided by financing activities decreased from $516.5$95.0 million in 20052008 to $104.3$62.0 million in 2006,2009, a decrease of $412.2$33.0 million.  The decrease relates primarily to increased net debt payoffs of $158.5 million or 79.8%. This decrease is primarily attributableduring 2009 as compared to 2008, an increase of $16.1 million in loan procurement costs related to the origination of 17 new secured financings during 2009; and the new secured term loan in December 2009; offset by proceeds of approximately $170.9 million from the follow-on offeringissuance of common shares in 2005, which generated approximately $378.7 million2009, and increased distributions paid to shareholders and minority partnersunit holders at $0.72 per share in 20062008 as compared to 2005 of $22.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively.similar distributions paid at $0.10 per share during 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $4.5 million in available cash and cash equivalents. We had approximately $31.0 million and $6.5 million of available borrowings under our revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2007 and February 28, 2008, respectively.

In February 2006, our Operating Partnership entered into a three-year, $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The credit facility allowed us to increase the amount that could be borrowed up to $350.0 million at a later date. The facility was scheduled to mature in February 2009, with the option for a one-year extended maturity date. Borrowings under the facility bore interest, at our option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin depending on our leverage ratio. The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points. The applicable margin for the alternative base rate ranged from 0.15% to 0.60%. The Eurodollar rate is a periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR. The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate ranged from 1.15% to 1.60%. We used the credit facility principally to finance acquisitions, development of self-storage facilities, debt repayments and for general working capital purposes. Upon entering into this agreement, we utilized the facility to repay a $30.0 million 60-day term loan.  Amounts borrowed under this facility were repaid using proceeds from a new credit facility in November 2006.

 In November 2006, we and our Operating Partnership entered into a 30-day, unsecured $50 million term loan agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association as the lender. The term loan bore interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The loan proceeds, along with borrowings under our revolving credit facility, were used to finance the repayment of certain maturing secured loans. The loan was paid in full from proceeds obtained upon entering into a new revolving credit facility in November 2006.

In November 2006, we and our Operating Partnership entered into a three-year, $450.0 million unsecured credit facility with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Keybanc Capital Markets, replacing our existing $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The facility consists of a $200 million term loan and a $250 million revolving credit facility.  The new facility has a three-year term with a one-year extension option and scheduled termination in November 2009.  Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio or our credit rating.  The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points.  The applicable margin for the alternative base rate will vary from 0.00% to 0.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grade rating, and will vary from 0.00% to 0.25% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.  The Eurodollar rate is a rate of interest that is fixed for interest periods of one, two, three or six

46



months based on the LIBOR rate determined two business days prior to the commencement of the applicable interest period.  The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate will vary from 1.00% to 1.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grade rating, and will vary from 0.425% to 1.00% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.

Our ability to borrow under this credit facility will be subject to our ongoing compliance with the following financial covenants, among others:

·Liquidity Overview         maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 65%;

·         minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.0:1.0;

·         minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.6:1.0; and

·         minimum tangible net worth of $673.2 million plus 75% of net proceeds from future equity issuances.

In September 2007, we and our Operating Partnership entered into a secured term loan agreement which allows for term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $50 million. Each term loan matures in November 2009, subject to extension at the sole discretion of the lenders. Each term loan bears interest at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, at our option, in each case plus an applicable margin at terms identical to the unsecured credit facility.  As of September 30, 2007, there was one term loan outstanding for $47.4 million.  The outstanding term loan is secured by a pledge by our Operating Partnership of all equity interests in YSI RT LLC, the wholly-owned subsidiary of our Operating Partnership that acquired eight self-storage facilities in September 2007.  At December 31, 2007, the outstanding term loan had an interest rate of 6.18%.  Financial covenants for the secured term loan are identical to the financial covenants for the unsecured credit facility described above.

During August and September 2007, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges that are designed to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on its variable rate debt. At December 31, 2007, the Company had an interest rate swap agreements for notional principal amounts aggregating $75 million. The swap agreements effectively fix the 30-day LIBOR interest rate on $50 million of credit facility borrowings at 4.7725% per annum and on $25 million of credit facility borrowings at 4.716% per annum, in each case until November 2009.  The interest rate cap agreement effectively limits the interest rate on $40 million of credit facility borrowings at 5.50% through June 2008. The notional amount at December 31, 2007 provides an indication of the extent of the Company’s involvement in these instruments at that time, but does not represent exposure to credit, interest rate or market risks.

 

Our cash flow from operations has historically been one of our primary sources of liquidity to fund debt service, distributions and capital expenditures.  We derive substantially all of our revenue from customers who lease space from us at our facilities.  Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our customers.  While weWe believe that the facilities in which we invest — self-storage facilities — are less sensitive than other real estate product types to current near-term economic downturns,downturns.  However, prolonged economic downturns will adversely affect our cash flowflows from operations.

 

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our shareholders on an annual basis or pay federal income tax.  The nature of our business, coupled with the requirement that we distribute a substantial portion of our income on an annual basis, will cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over both the short termshort-term and the long term. long-term.

Our short-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our facilities, refinancing of certain mortgage indebtedness, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on debt, expected distributions to limited partners and shareholders and recurring capital expenditures.  These expenses, as well as the amount of recurring capital expenditures that we incur,funding requirements will vary from year to year, in some cases significantly.  For 2008, weWe expect recurring capital expenditures in the 2011 fiscal year to incur costs totalingbe approximately $7 million to $9 million for capital expenditures.million.  In addition, our currently scheduled principal payments on debt, overincluding borrowings outstanding on the balance of 2008credit facility and unsecured term loan, are approximately $11.5$8.9 million and scheduled principal payments in 2009 are approximately $94.4 million.  We expect to meet our short-term liquidity needs through cash generated from operations and, if necessary, from borrowings under our revolving credit facility.2011.

 

Our long-termmost restrictive debt covenants limit the amount of additional leverage we can add; however, we believe cash flow from operations, access to our “at the market” program and access to our credit facility are adequate to execute our current business plan and remain in compliance with our debt covenants.

Our liquidity needs beyond 2011 consist primarily of funds necessary to pay forcontractual obligations which include repayments of indebtedness at maturity, as well as potential discretionary expenditures such as (i) non-recurring capital expenditures; (ii) redevelopment of operating facilities; (iii) acquisitions of additional facilities; and (iv) development of new facilities, redevelopment of operating facilities, non-recurring capital expenditures, acquisitions of facilities and repayment of indebtedness at maturity. In particular, we intend to actively pursue the acquisition of additional facilities, which will require additional capital. While these capital investments are elective by their nature, we do not expect that we will have sufficient funds on hand to cover these

47



investments.facilities.  We will have to satisfy theseour needs through either additional borrowings, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility, sales of common or preferred shares and/or cash generated through facility dispositions and joint venture transactions.

 

WeNotwithstanding the discussion above, we believe that, as a publicly traded REIT, we will have access to multiple sources of capital to fund long-term liquidity requirements, including the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity.  However, we cannot provide any assurance that this will be the case.  Our ability to incur additional debt will be dependent on a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing

45



Table of Contents

restrictions that may be imposed by lenders.  In addition, dislocation in the United States debt markets may significantly reduce the availability and increase the cost of long-term debt capital, including conventional mortgage financing and commercial mortgage-backed securities financing.  There can be no assurance that such capital will be readily available in the future.  Our ability to access the equity capital markets will be dependent on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about us.

 

Current and Expected Sources of Cash Excluding Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $5.9 million in available cash and cash equivalents.  In addition, we had approximately $207.0 million of availability for borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Bank Credit Facilities

On December 8, 2009, we entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “2009 Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million secured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility.  The 2009 Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in the 2009 Credit Facility agreement).  The 2009 Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facility (the “2006 Credit Facility”), which was entered into in November 2006, and consisted of a $200 million unsecured term loan and $250 million in unsecured revolving loans.  All borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, we amended the 2009 Credit Facility.  The amended credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility.  The Credit Facility has a three-year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the our leverage levels plus LIBOR.  We incurred $2.5 million of costs in connection with executing this amendment which was capitalized and is included as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization, on the our consolidated balance sheet.

At December 31, 2010, $200.0 million of unsecured term loan borrowings and $43.0 million of unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility.  Availability for borrowing under the unsecured revolving credit facility was $207.0 million.  As of December 31, 2010, borrowings under the Credit Facility had a weighted average interest rate of 3.8%.

Our ability to borrow under the amended credit facility is subject to our ongoing compliance with the following financial covenants which include:

·         Maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 60.0% at any time;

·         Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00; and

·         Minimum tangible net worth of $821,211,200 plus 75% of net proceeds from equity issuances after June 30, 2010.

Further, under the Credit Facility, we are restricted from paying distributions on our common shares that would exceed an amount equal to the greater of (i) 95% of our funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status.

We are currently in compliance with all of our covenants and anticipate being in compliance with all of our covenants through the term of the Credit Facility.

46



Table of Contents

Other Material Changes in Financial Position

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

(decrease)

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

(decrease)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Selected Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities — net

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

$

80,303

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

(2,042

)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

4,517

 

$

19,716

 

$

(15,199

)

 

$

5,891

 

$

102,768

 

$

(96,877

)

Other assets

 

$

14,270

 

$

6,475

 

$

7,795

 

Notes receivable, net

 

$

 

$

20,112

 

$

(20,112

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

$

219,000

 

$

90,500

 

$

128,500

 

 

$

43,000

 

$

 

$

43,000

 

Unecured term loan

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

200,000

 

Secured term loan

 

$

47,444

 

$

-

 

$

47,444

 

 

$

 

$

200,000

 

$

(200,000

)

Distributions payable

 

$

11,300

 

$

18,197

 

$

(6,897

)

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

372,457

 

$

569,026

 

$

(196,569

)

 

Storage facilities, increased $80.3net decreased $2.0 million cashduring 2010 primarily as a result of $64.4 million of depreciation expense recognized during 2010 and $37.4 million related to the disposition of 16 facilities during 2010, offset by the acquisition of 12 facilities for $84.7 million and fixed asset additions.  Cash and cash equivalents decreased $15.2$96.9 million ourprimarily due to funding the 2010 acquisitions and the repayment of several mortgages during 2010, offset by proceeds from the 2010 dispositions.  Notes receivable, net consisted of multiple promissory notes received in conjunction with storage facility dispositions and were fully repaid during 2010.

Our revolving credit facility increased $128.5$43.0 million as a result of borrowings related to payments for the 2010 acquisitions and the repayment of multiple mortgages in 2010. The unsecured term loan increased $200 million and the secured term loan increased $47.4balance decreased $200 million primarily as a resultdue to the amendment of the 2007 Acquisitions.  The changeCredit Facility in other assets is primarily attributableSeptember 2010.  Mortgage loans and notes payable decreased $196.6 million due to intangible assets assumed in conjunction with the 2007 acquisitions, which had a net carrying value of $4.6 million at December 31, 2007, as well as an increase in prepaid expenses, which is related to the timing of certain expenditures.  The change in the revolving credit facilityscheduled principal payments and secured term loan is also attributable to the repayment of multiple mortgage notesseveral mortgages during 2007.  Distributions payable decreased as a result of a board approved dividend decrease from $0.29 per share in the third quarter of 2007 to $0.18 per share in the fourth quarter of 2007.year.

48



Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 20072010 (in thousands):

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 and

 

 

Total

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013 and thereafter

 

 

Total

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

thereafter

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable (a)

 

$

559,916

 

$

11,541

 

$

94,425

 

$

112,497

 

$

88,180

 

$

162,347

 

$

90,926

 

 

$

372,481

 

$

8,893

 

$

163,710

 

$

26,240

 

$

91,058

 

$

60,095

 

$

22,485

 

Revolving credit facility, unsecured term loan and secured term loan

 

438,900

 

 

438,900

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan (b)

 

243,000

 

 

 

243,000

 

 

 

 

Interest payments (b)

 

169,148

 

59,044

 

50,727

 

22,620

 

14,547

 

10,838

 

11,372

 

 

95,424

 

29,303

 

26,561

 

20,186

 

9,891

 

4,450

 

5,033

 

Ground leases and third party office lease

 

2,625

 

537

 

434

 

428

 

428

 

387

 

411

 

 

548

 

149

 

149

 

149

 

101

 

 

 

Related party office leases

 

3,322

 

468

 

453

 

453

 

475

 

475

 

998

 

 

1,948

 

475

 

475

 

499

 

499

 

 

 

Software contracts

 

700

 

350

 

350

 

 

 

 

 

Software and service contracts

 

1,029

 

1,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment contracts

 

1,363

 

775

 

588

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,138

 

918

 

610

 

610

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,175,974

 

$

72,715

 

$

585,877

 

$

135,998

 

$

103,630

 

$

174,047

 

$

103,707

 

 

$

716,568

 

$

40,767

 

$

191,505

 

$

290,684

 

$

101,549

 

$

64,545

 

$

27,518

 

 


(a)  Amounts do not include unamortized discounts/premiums.

 

(b)  Interest on variable rate debt calculated using LIBOR as of 5.03%December 31, 2010, plus a spread of 3.50%.

47



Table of Contents

 

We expect that the contractual obligations owed in 20082011 will be satisfied by a combination of cash generated from operations and from draws on the revolving credit facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The Company’s future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments depend upon prevailing interest rates.

Market Risk

 

Our investment policy relating to cash and cash equivalents is to preserve principal and liquidity while maximizing the return through investment of available funds.  We did not hold any auction rate securities at December 31, 2006 or December 31, 2007.

 

Effect of Changes in Interest Rates on our Outstanding Debt

 

The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market rates.  The range of changes chosen reflects our view of changes which are reasonably possible over a one—yearone-year period.  Market values are the present value of projected future cash flows based on the market rates chosen.

 

Our financial instruments consist of both fixed and variable rate debt.  As of December 31, 2007,2010, our consolidated debt consisted of $556.4$372.5 million in fixed rate loans payable, and variable rate loans totaling $471.1 million, consisting of $219.0 million borrowings under our variable rate revolving credit facility, $200.0 million in a variable rate unsecured term loan and $52.1$43.0 million in a variable rate secured loans.the unsecured revolving credit facility.  All financial instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes and the net market value of these financial instruments is referred to as the net financial position.  Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable rate portions of our debt portfolio.  A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of the debt portfolio impacts the net financial instrument position, but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows.  A

49



change in interest rates on the variable portion of the debt portfolio impacts the interest incurred and cash flows , but does not impact the net financial instrument position.

 

If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 1%, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $4.4$2.4 million a year.  If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt decrease by 1%, the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $4.4$2.4 million a year.

 

If market rates of interest increase by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed—ratefixed-rate mortgage debt would decrease by approximately $18.2$9.3 million.  If market rates of interest decrease by 1%, the fair value of our outstanding fixed—ratefixed-rate mortgage debt would increase by approximately $19.1$9.7 million.

 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Financial statements required by this item appear with an Index to Financial Statements and Schedules, starting on page F—1F-1 of this report.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

48



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a—15(e) and 15(d)—15(e)13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)).  Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

During the fourth quarter, we completed the remediation of the material weaknesses in internal control relating to the requisite skills and competencies or appropriate depth of experience of our accounting department personnel to assure the preparation of accurate interim and annual financial statements on a timely basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; inadequate monitoring controls and the appropriate personnel with the requisite skills and competencies to execute an adequate level of oversight to accurately account for the results of our operations, which adversely affected our ability to report our financial results in a timely and accurate manner; and our lack of robust risk assessment processes, including strategic plans, that clearly defined and communicated our goals and objectives throughout our organization identified as of December 31, 2006. There havehas been no other changeschange in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recently completedrecent fiscal quarter, that havehas materially affected, or areis reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the end of the period covered by this report.reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

 

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not applicable.

 

5049



Table of Contents

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.  TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for all of our employees, officers and trustees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, which is available on our website at www.u—store—it.com.www.ustoreit.com.  We intend to disclose any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver.

 

The remaining information required by this item regarding trustees, executive officers and corporate governance is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Shareholders Meeting to be held in 20082011 (the “Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Proposal 1: Election of Trustees,” “Executive Officers” and “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Trustees.”  The information required by this item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Other Matters — Section“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

 

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation Committee Report,” “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Trustees — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation, and Other Information,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” and “Trustee Compensation.”

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010.

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a)

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

5,013,760

(1)

$

10.38

(2)

4,902,492

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

4,902,492

 


(1)Excludes 671,822 shares subject to outstanding restricted share unit awards.

(2)This number reflects the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and has been calculated exclusive of outstanding restricted unit awards.

 

The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of CertainManagement” and “Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners and Management.Owners.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2007.

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a)

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

1,916,771

(1)

$

18.95

(2)

4,318,445

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

1,916,771

 

$

18.95

 

4,318,445

 


(1)

Excludes 172,814 shares subject to outstanding restricted share unit awards, 5,257 shares subject to outstanding deferred share unit awards, and 13,329 shares subject to deferred shares credited to the account of our Trustees in the U- Store-It Trust Deferred Trustees Plan.

(2)

This number reflects the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and has been calculated exclusive of outstanding restricted unit awards.

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Corporate Governance- Independence of Trustees,” “Policies and Procedures Regarding Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions With Related Persons,” and “Transactions With Related Persons.”

 

50



Table of Contents

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Proxy Statement under the captions “Audit Committee Matters - Fees Paid to Our Independent Auditor”Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Audit“— Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”

51



PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

 

1. Financial Statements.

 

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

 

2. Financial Statement Schedules.

 

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

 

3. Exhibits.

 

The list of exhibits filed with this report is set forth in response to Item 15(b). The required exhibit index has been filed with the exhibits.

 

(b) Exhibits.  The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report:

 

Exhibit No.

3.1*

 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

3.2*

 

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.13.2 to the Company’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K,10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed on November 5, 2007.10, 2008.

 

 

 

4.1*

 

Form of Common Share Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on October 20, 2004, File No. 333-117848.

 

 

 

10.1*

 

Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of U-Store-It, L.P. dated as of October 27, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.2*

 

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 14, 2007,December 7, 2009, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., as borrower, U-Store-It Trust, as parent, Wachovia Capital Markets,Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as lead arranger and book manager,Bank of America Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agentBank of America, N.A., Regions Bank, SunTrust Bank and the financial institutions initially signatory thereto, and their assignees, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 14, 2007.December 8, 2009.

 

 

 

10.3*

 

Form of Term Note with respect to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2007,Guaranty, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.210.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 14, 2007.December 8, 2009.

 

 

 

10.4*

 

Form of Guaranty with respect to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2007,Term Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.310.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 14, 2007.December 8, 2009.

 

 

 

10.5*

 

Form of Pledge Agreement, with respect to the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 14, 2007.

52



10.6  *

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 12, 2007, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., as borrower, U-Store-It Trust, as parent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as agent and each of the financial institutions party thereto, as lenders, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 9, 2007.

10.7  *

Alternative CurrencyRevolving Note, dated as of June 12, 2007, executed on behalf of U-Store-It, L.P. , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 9, 2007.

10.8  *

Guarantor Acknowledgment, dated as of June 12, 2007, executed on behalf of U-Store-It, L.P., U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and YSI Management LLC, as guarantors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on August 9, 2007.

10.9  *

Credit Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2006, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., as borrower, U-Store-It Trust, as parent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Keybanc Capital Markets, as joint lead arrangers, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as book manager, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Keybank National Association, as syndication agent, Bank of America, N.A., SunTrust Bank, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, each as documentation agent, and the financial institutions party thereto, as lenders, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 28, 2006.December 8, 2009.

51



Table of Contents

10.10  *

Guaranty, dated as of November 21, 2006, executed on behalf of U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and YSI Management LLC, as guarantors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 28, 2006.

10.11  *

Form of Term Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 28, 2006.

10.12  *

Form of Revolving Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006.

10.13  *10.6*

 

Form of Swingline Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 28, 2006.

10.14  *

Credit Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. as borrower and Wachovia Bank, National Association as lender, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 7, 2006.December 8, 2009.

 

 

 

10.15  *

Note, dated as of November 1, 2006, executed on behalf of U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 7, 2006.

10.16  *

Guaranty, dated as of November 1, 2006, executed on behalf of U-Store-It Trust, U- Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and YSI Management LLC, as guarantors, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 7, 2006.

10.17  *10.7*

 

Form of Security Interest regarding fixed rate mortgage loan between YSI XX LP and TransAmericaTransamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 4, 2005.

53



 

10.18  *10.8*

 

Secured Promissory Note, dated November 1, 2005, between YSI XX LP and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 4, 2005.

 

 

 

10.19  *10.9*

 

Loan Agreement, dated August 4, 2005, by and between YASKY LLC and LaSalle Bank National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed on November 14, 2005.

 

 

 

10.20  *10.10*

 

Loan Agreement, dated July 19, 2005, by and between YSI VI LLC and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed on November 14, 2005.

 

 

 

10.21  *10.11*

 

Loan Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and between YSI I LLC and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. d/b/a Lehman Capital, a division of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.22  *10.12*

 

Loan Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and between YSI II LLC and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. d/b/a/a Lehman Capital, a division of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.23  *10.13*

 

LoanStandstill Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between YSI III LLCamong, U-Store-It Trust, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB,Todd C. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.24  *10.14*

 

Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P., YSI Management LLC, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., U-Store-It Development, LLC, Dean Jernigan, Kathleen A. Weigand, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell, Kyle V. Amsdell, Rising Tide Development LLC, and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.25  *10.15*

 

Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Rising Tide Development, LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.26  *

Standstill Agreement, by and among, U-Store-It Trust, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.27  *10.16*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated March 29, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.28  *10.17*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.29  *10.18*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

54



 

10.30  *10.19*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.31  *10.20*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

52



Table of Contents

10.21*

Lease, dated March 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005.

 

 

 

10.32  *10.22*

Lease, dated June 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

10.23*

Lease, dated June 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

10.24*

 

Option Termination Agreement, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.33  *10.25*

 

Property Management Termination Agreement, by and among U-Store-It Trust, YSI Management LLC, and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.34  *10.26*

 

Marketing and Ancillary Services Termination Agreement, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.35  *

Office Lease, dated March 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store- it, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005.

10.36  *

Lease, dated June 29, 2005 by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

10.37  *

Lease, dated June 29, 2005 by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

10.38  *

Non-Exclusive Aircraft Lease Agreement, dated July 1, 2005 by and between Aqua Sun Investments, L.L.C. and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

10.39  *

Marketing and Ancillary Services Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co. and Rising Tide Development, LLC incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.40  *

Property Management Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between YSI Management LLC and Rising Tide Development, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.41  *

Option Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Rising Tide Development, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

55



10.42  *

Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated as of April 3, 2006, by and among JPG 3595 Anderson Farm, LLC, JPG 1350 N. 1st Street, L.P., JPG 1236 Texas Street, L.P., JPG 201 N. I-35 L.P., JPG 6446 East Main, LLC, JPG 5411 West Broad, LLC, JPG 3300 Southwest LLC, JPG 5252 Nike Drive, LLC, JPG 43 Old Olden, LLC, and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.

10.43  *†10.27*†

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2006,June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Todd C. Amsdell,Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 28, 2006.July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.44  *†10.28*†

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2007, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.45  *†

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2007,January 24, 2011, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.710.2 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q,8-K, filed on May 10, 2007.January 27, 2011.

 

 

 

10.46  *†10.29*†

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2007,June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.810.2 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q,8-K, filed on May 10, 2007.July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.47  *†

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2007, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Stephen R. Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.48  *†

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated April 20, 2007, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Kathleen A. Weigand, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.49  10.30*

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2008, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Daniel B. Hurwitz, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed herewith.on February 29, 2008.

 

 

 

10.50  *†10.31*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2007, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Marianne M. Keler, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.51  *†10.32*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007.

 

 

 

10.52  *†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Stephen R. Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 10, 2006.

10.53  *†10.33*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated June 5, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store- It,U-Store-It, L.P. and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed on August 8, 2006.

10.54  *†

10.34*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.

56



10.55  *†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2006 by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Kathleen A. Weigand, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 1, 2006.

 

 

 

10.56  *†10.35*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Robert J. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the

53



Table of Contents

Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.57  *†10.36*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Barry L. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.58  *†10.37*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Todd C. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.59  *†10.38*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and John C. Dannemiller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.60  *†10.39*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Thomas A. Commes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.61  *†10.40*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and David J. LaRue, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.62  *†10.41*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Harold S. Haller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.63  *†10.42*†

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and William M. Diefenderfer III, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.64  *†10.43*†

 

ModificationIndemnification Agreement, dated as of Noncompetition Agreement and Termination of Employment Agreement,November 5, 2009, by and betweenamong U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Robert J. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007,John F. Remondi, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1210.43 to the Company’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K,10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on August 7, 2007.March 1, 2010.

 

 

 

10.65  *†10.44*†

 

Modification of Noncompetition AgreementAmended and Termination of Employment Agreement, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Todd C. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.66  *†

Modification of Noncompetition Agreement, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Barry L. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.67  *†

Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2006,June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 16, 2007.

57



10.68  *†

Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Stephen R. Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 10, 2006.2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.69  *†10.45*†

 

Amended and Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006,January 24, 2011, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q,8-K, filed on August 8, 2006.January 27, 2011.

 

 

 

10.70  *†10.46*†

 

Amended and Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.71  *†

Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Barry L. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.72  *†

Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Robert J. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.73  *†

Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Todd C. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.74  *†10.47*†

 

Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Trustees of U-Store-It Trust, effective May 8, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.75  *†10.48*†

 

Schedule of 2008 Equity Awards for Executive Officers of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.76  *†

Schedule of 2007 Annual Incentive Payouts and 2008 Base Salaries for Executive Officers of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.77  *†

Schedule of 2007 Equity Awards to Executive Officers of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 28, 2007.

10.78  *†

Schedule of 2007 Salaries Approved for Named Executive Officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 26, 2007.

10.79  *†

Deferred Share Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Kathleen A. Weigand, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on March 1, 2006.

10.80  *†

Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2006, by and between U- Store-It Trust and Stephen R. Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed on July 13, 2006.

10.81  *†

Non-QualifiedNonqualified Share Option Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, by and between U- Store-ItU-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed on August 8, 2006.

58



10.82  *†

 

Non-Qualified

10.49*†

Nonqualified Share Option Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, by and between U- Store-ItU-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.

 

 

 

10.83  10.50*

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Trustees under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.83 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed herewith.on February 29, 2008.

54



Table of Contents

10.84  *†10.51*†

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Trustees under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.85  *†10.52*†

 

Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement (Three-Year Vesting) under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

 

 

 

10.86  *†10.53*†

 

Form of Non-QualifiedNonqualified Share Option Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.87  *†10.54*†

 

Form of Performance-Vested Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

 

 

 

10.88  *†10.55*†

 

Form of Performance-Vested Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.89  *†10.56*†

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

 

 

 

10.90  *†10.57*†

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.91  *†

Restricted Share Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.88 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 16, 2007.

10.92  *†

Restricted Share Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Stephen R. Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 10, 2006.

10.93  *†

Restricted Share Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 8, 2006.

10.94  *†10.58*†

 

U-Store-It Trust Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as ofeffective January 1, 2007,2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9110.78 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 16, 2007.2, 2009.

 

 

 

10.95  *†10.59*†

 

U-Store-It Trust Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated as ofeffective January 1, 2007,2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9210.79 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 16, 2007.2, 2009.

59



 

10.96  *†10.60*†

 

U-Store-It Trust Deferred Trustees Plan, effective as of May 31, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 6, 2005.

 

 

 

10.97  *†10.61*†

 

Amended and Restated U-Store It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, of U-Store-It Trust effective as of May 8, 2007,June 2, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q,8-K, filed on May 10, 2007.June 4, 2010.

 

 

 

10.98  *†10.62*†

 

2004 Equity Incentive Plan of U-Store-It Trust, effective as of October 19, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.63*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2009, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Jeffrey Foster, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.83 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

10.64*†

Severance and General Release Agreement dated February 10, 2009 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Kathleen Weigand, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.84 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

10.65*†

Severance and General Release Agreement dated December 31, 2008 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Steve Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.85 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

55



Table of Contents

10.66*

Contribution Agreement dated August 6, 2009 by and between YSI Venture LP LLC and HART -YSI Investor LP LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2009.

10.67*

First Amendment to Contribution Agreement dated August 13, 2009 by and between YSI Venture LP LLC and HART -YSI Investor LP LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 14, 2009.

10.68*

Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of YSI — HART LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dated August 13, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 14, 2009.

10.69*

Sales Agreement dated April 3, 2009, among the U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P., and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 3, 2009.

10.70*†

Letter Agreement dated January 9, 2009 between U-Store-It Trust and Jeffrey P. Foster, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.

10.71*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2010, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Piero Bussani, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.71 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.

10.72*†

Employment letter Agreement, dated July 13, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Robert G. Blatz, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 29, 2010.

10.73*

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2010, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., U-Store-It Trust, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Banc of America Securities LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 4, 2010.

10.74*

Amendment No. 1 to Sales Agreement, dated January 26, 2011, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store It, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2011.

10.75*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2011, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Jeffrey F. Rogatz, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 1, 2011.

12.1

Statement regarding Computation of Ratios of U-Store-It Trust

21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries.Subsidiaries

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.KPMG LLP

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*

Incorporated herein by reference as above indicated.

 

 

 

99.1

 

Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.Material Tax Considerations

 


60*              Incorporated herein by reference as above indicated.

†              Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

56



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d)15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/  Christopher P. MarrTimothy M. Martin

 

 

Christopher P. MarrTimothy M. Martin

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ William M. Diefenderfer III

 

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

William M. Diefenderfer III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Dean Jernigan

 

Chief Executive Officer and Trustee

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

Dean Jernigan

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Christopher P. MarrTimothy M. Martin

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

February 29, 2008

Christopher P. Marr

(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Timothy M. Martin

Chief Accounting Officer

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

Timothy M. Martin

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Thomas A. CommesPiero Bussani

 

Trustee

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

Thomas A. Commes

/s/ John C. Dannemiller

Trustee

February 29, 2008

John C. DannemillerPiero Bussani

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Harold S. Haller

 

Trustee

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

Harold S. Haller

/s/ Daniel B. Hurwitz

Trustee

February 29, 2008

Daniel B. Hurwitz

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Marianne M. Keler

 

Trustee

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

Marianne M. Keler

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ David J. LaRue

 

Trustee

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

David J. LaRue

 

 

 

 

/s/ John R. Remondi

Trustee

March 1, 2011

John R. Remondi

/s/ Jeffrey F. Rogatz

Trustee

March 1, 2011

Jeffrey F. Rogatz

 

6157



Table of Contents

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page No.

Consolidated Financial Statements of U-Store-It Trust and Subsidiaries (The “Company”)

 

 

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

F-2

 

 

ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms

F-3

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-4

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20072010 and 20062009

F-5

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

F-6

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

F-7

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008

F-8

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9

 

F-1



Table of Contents

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

 

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and report on the basis of that assessment whether the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

 

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

·                  pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and the disposition of the assets of the Company;

 

·                  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that the receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with the authorization of the Company’s management and its Board of Trustees; and

 

·                  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

 

Under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted a review, evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based upon the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) criteria. In performing its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2007,2010, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO framework.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, has been audited by Deloitte & ToucheKPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that appears herein.

 

February 29, 2008March 1, 2011

 

F-2



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMTable of Contents

 

To theReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of

U-Store-It Trust
Cleveland, OhioTrust:

 

We have audited theU-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”), as of December 31, 20072010, based on criteria established in InternalControl - Integrated Framework issuedissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’sCommission (COSO). U-Store-It Trust’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management’s report of internal control over financial reporting.Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) providepr ovide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the CompanyU-Store-It Trust maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based on the criteria established in InternalControl - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We also have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheetsheets of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007,2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company2010, and our report dated February 29, 2008March 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.statements.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

February 29, 2008

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 1, 2011

F-3



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMTable of Contents

 

To theReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of

U-Store-It Trust
Cleveland, OhioTrust:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20072010 and 20062009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits2010.  In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we have also includedaudited the financial statement schedule for 2010 as listed in the Index at Item 15.accompanying index.  These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, suchthe consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20072010 and 20062009 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007,2010, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted in the United States of America.accounting principles. Also in our opinion, suchthe related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein.therein.

 

We also have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’sU-Store-It Trust’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 29, 2008March 1, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE

/s/ KPMG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio

February 29, 2008

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 1, 2011

F-4



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities

 

$

1,916,396

 

$

1,771,864

 

 

$

1,743,021

 

$

1,774,542

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(269,278

)

(205,049

)

 

1,647,118

 

1,566,815

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

(314,530

)

(344,009

)

Storage facilities, net

 

1,428,491

 

1,430,533

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

4,517

 

19,716

 

 

5,891

 

102,768

 

Restricted cash

 

15,818

 

14,126

 

 

10,250

 

16,381

 

Loan procurement costs - net of amortization

 

6,108

 

7,575

 

Other assets

 

14,270

 

6,475

 

Due from related parties

 

 

632

 

Loan procurement costs, net of amortization

 

15,611

 

18,366

 

Notes receivable, net

 

 

20,112

 

Other assets, net

 

18,576

 

10,710

 

Total assets

 

$

1,687,831

 

$

1,615,339

 

 

$

1,478,819

 

$

1,598,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

$

219,000

 

$

90,500

 

 

$

43,000

 

$

 

Unsecured term loan

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

 

200,000

 

 

Secured term loan

 

47,444

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

561,057

 

588,930

 

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

33,623

 

22,590

 

Due to related parties

 

110

 

336

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

36,172

 

33,767

 

Distributions payable

 

11,300

 

18,197

 

 

7,275

 

2,448

 

Deferred revenue

 

10,148

 

9,740

 

 

8,873

 

8,449

 

Security deposits

 

548

 

655

 

 

489

 

456

 

Total liabilities

 

1,083,230

 

930,948

 

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minority interests

 

48,982

 

56,898

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 57,577,232 and 57,335,490 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

 

576

 

573

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 98,596,796 and 92,654,979 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

 

986

 

927

 

Additional paid in capital

 

797,940

 

794,632

 

 

1,026,952

 

974,926

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(1,664

)

 

 

(1,121

)

(874

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(241,233

)

(167,712

)

 

(302,601

)

(279,670

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

555,619

 

627,493

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

1,687,831

 

$

1,615,339

 

Total U-Store-It Trust shareholders’ equity

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

Total equity

 

765,408

 

739,330

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

1,478,819

 

$

1,598,870

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS

OPERATIONS

 

 

For the Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

211,974

 

$

195,331

 

$

135,169

 

Other property related income

 

16,828

 

14,816

 

10,001

 

Other - related party

 

365

 

457

 

405

 

Total revenues

 

229,167

 

210,604

 

145,575

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

96,802

 

85,415

 

54,793

 

Property operating expenses - related party

 

59

 

69

 

43

 

Depreciation

 

70,192

 

64,079

 

39,479

 

Asset write-off

 

 

305

 

 

Lease abandonment

 

1,316

 

 

 

General and administrative

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

17,786

 

General and administrative - related party

 

337

 

613

 

736

 

Total operating expenses

 

190,672

 

172,156

 

112,837

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

38,495

 

38,448

 

32,738

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

(31,907

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

(2,045

)

Write-off of loan procurement cost due to early extinguishment of debt

 

 

(1,907

)

(93

)

Interest income

 

401

 

1,336

 

2,404

 

Other

 

118

 

191

 

(47

)

Total other expense

 

(55,361

)

(47,980

)

(31,688

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS

 

(16,866

)

(9,532

)

1,050

 

MINORITY INTERESTS

 

1,385

 

790

 

(71

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

(15,481

)

(8,742

)

979

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from operations

 

102

 

208

 

452

 

Gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

2,517

 

 

179

 

Minority interest attributable to discontinued operations

 

(215

)

(17

)

(42

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,404

 

191

 

589

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

$

1,568

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.02

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations

 

$

0.04

 

$

 

$

0.02

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.04

 

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,120

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,203

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per common share and unit

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.16

 

$

1.13

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

Other property related income

 

 

18,640

 

 

16,086

 

 

15,130

 

Property management fee income

 

 

2,829

 

 

56

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

216,826

 

 

210,732

 

 

217,330

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

 

93,696

 

 

91,380

 

 

92,533

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

62,945

 

 

69,125

 

 

71,974

 

General and administrative

 

 

25,406

 

 

22,569

 

 

24,964

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

182,047

 

 

183,074

 

 

189,471

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

 

34,779

 

 

27,658

 

 

27,859

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

(37,794

)

 

(45,269

)

 

(52,014

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

(6,463

)

 

(2,339

)

 

(1,929

)

Interest income

 

 

621

 

 

681

 

 

153

 

Acquisition related costs

 

 

(759

)

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(235

)

 

(33

)

 

94

 

Total other expense

 

 

(44,630

)

 

(46,960

)

 

(53,696

)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

(9,851

)

 

(19,302

)

 

(25,837

)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

2,006

 

 

4,831

 

 

9,219

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

1,826

 

 

14,139

 

 

19,720

 

Total discontinued operations

 

 

3,832

 

 

18,970

 

 

28,939

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME

 

 

(6,019

)

 

(332

)

 

3,102

 

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

381

 

 

60

 

 

(310

)

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

 

(1,755

)

 

(665

)

 

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.04

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.46

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding

 

 

93,998

 

 

70,988

 

 

57,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

Total discontinued operations

 

 

3,656

 

 

17,984

 

 

26,595

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares

 

Additional
Paid in

 

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

Total
Shareholders’

 

Noncontrolling
Interest in

 

Total

 

Noncontrolling

Interests in the
Operating

 

 

Common Shares

 

Paid in

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Number

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Loss

 

Deficit

 

Equity

 

Subsidiaries

 

Equity

 

Partnership

 

 

Number

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Loss

 

Deficit

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 

37,345

 

$

373

 

$

394,293

 

$

 

$

(37,441

$

357,225

 

Net proceeds from sale of common shares

 

19,665

 

197

 

378,550

 

 

 

 

 

378,747

 

Issuance of trustee deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

 

 

 

 

82

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,734

 

 

 

 

 

1,734

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

 

 

 

 

510

 

Adjustment for minority interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

15,203

 

 

 

 

 

15,203

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,568

 

1,568

 

Accretion of operating partnership units

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,976

(2,976

)

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(53,624

(53,624

)

Balance at December 31, 2005

 

57,010

 

$

570

 

$

790,372

 

$

 

$

(92,473

$

698,469

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

139

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Proceeds from option exercise

 

186

 

2

 

2,985

 

 

 

 

 

2,987

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

649

 

 

 

 

 

649

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

444

 

 

 

 

 

444

 

Issuance of trustee deferred shares

 

 

 

 

 

176

 

 

 

 

 

176

 

Adjustment for minority interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,551

(8,551

)

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(66,688

(66,688

)

Balance at December 31, 2006

 

57,335

 

$

573

 

$

794,632

 

$

 

$

(167,712

$

627,493

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

57,577

 

$

 

576

 

$

 

797,940

 

$

 

(1,664

)

$

 

(241,233

)

$

 

555,619

 

$

 

 

$

 

555,619

 

$

48,982

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

123

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

119

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

 

 

972

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

867

 

 

 

 

 

867

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

Adjustment for minority interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

1,469

 

 

 

 

 

1,469

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13,077

(13,077

)

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

(310

)

57

 

 

 

57

 

(435

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,102

 

3,102

 

 

 

3,102

 

310

 

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,545

)

 

 

(1,545

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(119

)

 

 

(119

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

Total comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,741

)

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(60,444

(60,444

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32,683

)

(32,683

)

 

 

(32,683

)

(2,831

)

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

57,577

 

$

576

 

$

797,940

 

$

(1,664

)

$

(241,233

$

555,619

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 

57,623

 

$

 

576

 

$

 

801,029

 

$

 

(7,553

)

$

 

(271,124

)

$

 

522,928

 

$

 

 

$

 

522,928

 

$

46,026

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,739

 

44,739

 

(90

)

Issuance of common shares, net

 

34,677

 

347

 

170,501

 

 

 

 

 

170,848

 

 

 

170,848

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

85

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

270

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(937

)

(937

)

665

 

(272

)

(60

)

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,153

 

 

 

6,153

 

 

 

6,153

 

1

 

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

526

 

27

 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,609

)

(7,609

)

(1,383

)

(8,992

)

(510

)

Balance at December 31, 2009

 

92,655

 

$

 

927

 

$

 

974,926

 

$

 

(874

)

$

 

(279,670

)

$

 

695,309

 

$

 

44,021

 

$

 

739,330

 

$

45,394

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

15

 

 

 

Issuance of common shares, net

 

5,610

 

56

 

47,517

 

 

 

 

 

47,573

 

 

 

47,573

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

203

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

73

 

1

 

674

 

 

 

 

 

675

 

 

 

675

 

(675

)

Exercise of stock options

 

56

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,510

)

(1,510

)

 

 

(1,510

)

1,510

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,393

)

(7,393

)

1,755

 

(5,638

)

(381

)

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(247

)

 

 

(247

)

(8

)

(255

)

(13

)

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,028

)

(14,028

)

(4,591

)

(18,619

)

(690

)

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

98,597

 

$

 

986

 

$

 

1,026,952

 

$

 

(1,121

)

$

 

(302,601

)

$

 

724,216

 

$

 

41,192

 

$

 

765,408

 

45,145

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

$

1,568

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

72,218

 

66,727

 

42,174

 

Asset write-off

 

 

305

 

 

Lease abandonment charge

 

1,316

 

 

 

Gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

(2,311

)

 

 

Equity compensation expense

 

1,840

 

1,272

 

2,244

 

Accretion of fair market value of debt

 

(367

)

(692

)

(378

)

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

1,907

 

93

 

Minority interests

 

(995

)

(773

)

113

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

 

(179

)

Changes in other operating accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

(2,756

)

(350

)

(2,674

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

6,660

 

5,733

 

3,187

 

Other liabilities

 

346

 

(1,011

)

(42

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

62,874

 

$

64,567

 

$

46,106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions, additions and improvements to storage facilities

 

(48,014

)

(312,352

)

(381,083

)

Acquisitions, additions and improvements to storage facilities - related party

 

(121,805

)

(37,414

)

(10,889

)

Proceeds from sales of properties

 

17,935

 

42

 

6,203

 

Proceeds from sales of marketable securities

 

 

114,170

 

29,825

 

Investment in marketable securities

 

 

(19,000

)

(124,995

)

Insurance settlements

 

 

1,712

 

500

 

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

 

(1,692

)

4,795

 

(8,624

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(153,576

)

$

(248,047

)

$

(489,063

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net proceeds from sale of common shares

 

 

 

378,747

 

Proceeds from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

156,500

 

331,000

 

 

Unsecured Term Loan

 

 

200,000

 

 

Secured term loan

 

47,444

 

 

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

4,651

 

 

409,257

 

Short-term financing

 

 

80,000

 

 

Principal payments on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

(28,000

)

(240,500

)

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

(32,157

)

(114,111

)

(219,875

)

Short term financing

 

 

(80,000

)

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

(39

)

(100

)

Distributions paid to shareholders

 

(66,816

)

(66,623

)

(44,532

)

Distributions paid to minority partners

 

(5,975

)

(6,017

)

(2,349

)

Loan procurement costs

 

(144

)

(2,398

)

(4,691

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

 

2,985

 

 

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

 

$

75,503

 

$

104,297

 

$

516,547

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(15,199

)

(79,183

)

73,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

19,716

 

98,899

 

25,399

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

4,517

 

19,716

 

$

98,899

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized

 

$

53,952

 

$

45,461

 

$

33,893

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisations of facilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of OP units

 

 

 

(68,594

)

Mortgage loans

 

 

(34,451

)

(99,782

)

Other, net

 

 

(2,032

)

(1,660

)

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(6,019

)

$

(332

)

$

3,102

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

70,850

 

75,908

 

80,132

 

Gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

(1,826

)

(14,139

)

(19,720

)

Equity compensation expense

 

3,641

 

3,396

 

2,722

 

Accretion of fair market value adjustment of debt

 

(255

)

(463

)

(446

)

Changes in other operating accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

(427

)

388

 

1,425

 

Restricted cash

 

3,889

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

1,437

 

(1,797

)

(7

)

Other liabilities

 

227

 

(747

)

(196

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

71,517

 

$

62,214

 

$

67,012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions, additions and improvements to storage facilities

 

(104,441

)

(17,882

)

(30,738

)

Insurance settlements

 

 

 

1,447

 

Proceeds from sales of properties, net

 

37,304

 

68,257

 

56,867

 

Proceeds from notes receivable

 

20,112

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales to noncontrolling interests

 

 

48,641

 

 

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

 

2,242

 

(164

)

(399

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

$

(44,783

)

$

98,852

 

$

27,177

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

95,000

 

9,500

 

57,300

 

Secured term loans

 

 

200,000

 

9,975

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

 

116,615

 

 

Principal payments on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

(52,000

)

(181,500

)

(104,300

)

Unsecured term loans

 

 

(200,000

)

 

Secured term loans

 

 

(57,419

)

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

(196,205

)

(95,211

)

(12,526

)

Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net

 

47,573

 

170,852

 

 

Exercise of stock options

 

194

 

 

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

15

 

 

 

Distributions paid to shareholders

 

(9,407

)

(6,736

)

(41,621

)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership

 

(482

)

(508

)

(3,656

)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(4,591

)

(1,383

)

 

Loan procurement costs

 

(3,708

)

(16,252

)

(134

)

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 

$

(123,611

)

$

(62,042

)

$

(94,962

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(96,877

)

99,024

 

(773

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

102,768

 

3,744

 

4,517

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

5,891

 

$

102,768

 

$

3,744

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Cash Flow and Noncash Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized

 

$

38,346

 

$

43,764

 

$

52,291

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition related contingent consideration

 

$

1,777

 

$

 

$

 

Notes receivable originated upon disposition of property

 

$

 

$

17,600

 

$

2,612

 

Derivative valuation adjustment

 

$

 

$

6,153

 

$

(4,608

)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

$

(268

)

$

553

 

$

(1,281

)

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-8



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.  ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

U-Store-It Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (collectively with its subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”), is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, activethat specializes in acquiring, developing, managing and operating self-storage properties for business and personal use under month-to-month leases.  As of December 31, 2007, the Company owned 409The Company’s self-storage facilities (collectively, the “Properties”) containing an aggregate of approximately 26.1 million rentable square feet.  The Properties are located in 26 states throughout the United States. All references to building square footage, occupancy percentage,States, and in the District of Columbia and the number of buildingsUK and are unaudited.

managed under one reportable segment: we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.  The Company owns substantially all of its assets and conducts its operations through U-Store-It, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”).  The Company is the sole generalgenera l partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2007,2010 owned a 91.9%95.4% interest in the Operating Partnership.  The Company manages its owned assets through YSI Management, LLC (the “Management Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership.  In addition to managing the Properties, the Management Company managed approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet related to facilitiesPartnership, and manages assets owned by related partiesp asthird parties through Storage Asset Management, LLC, also a wholly owned subsidiary of December 31, 2007.the Operating Partnership.   The Company owns 100% of U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co. (the “TRS”), which it hasfour subsidiaries that have elected to treatbe treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary.subsidiaries.  In general, a taxable REIT subsidiary, which is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may perform non-customary services for tenants, hold assets that the Company, as a REIT, cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business.

The Company was formed in July 2004 to succeed the self-storage operations owned directly and indirectly by Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell and their affiliated entities and related family trusts (the “Amsdell Entities”). The Company commenced operations on October 21, 2004, after completing the mergers of Amsdell Partners, Inc. and High Tide LLC with and into the Company. The Company subsequently completed an initial public offering (“IPO”) of its common shares on October 27, 2004 concurrently with the consummation of various formation transactions. The IPO consisted of the sale of an aggregate of 28,750,000 common shares (including 3,750,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) at an offering price of $16.00 per share, generating gross proceeds of $460.0 million. The IPO resulted in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriting discount and commissions, financial advisory fees and expenses of the IPO, of approximately $425.0 million.

In October 2005, the Company completed a follow-on public offering, pursuant to which it sold an aggregate of 19,665,000 common shares (including 2,565,000 shares pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ option) at an offering price of $20.35 per share, for gross proceeds of $400.2 million. The offering resulted in net proceeds to the Company, after deducting underwriting discount and commissions and expenses of the offering, of approximately $378.7 million.

 

2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company, and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries.  The portion of these entities not owned by the Company is presented as minority interestnoncontrolling interests as of and during the periods consolidated.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on the consolidation of VIEs. When an entity is not deemed to be a VIE, the Company considers the provisions of additional FASB guidance to determine whether a general partner, or the general partners as a group, controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights. The Company consolidates (i) entities that are VIEs and of which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs which the Company controls and which the limited partners do not have the ability to diss olve or remove the Company without cause nor substantive participating rights.

Noncontrolling Interests

The FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements which was effective on January 1, 2009.  The guidance states that noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests.  Under the guidance, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.

However, per the FASB issued authoritative guidance on theclassification and measurement of redeemable securities, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity.  This would result in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions.  Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the FASB issued guidance onaccounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and

F-9



Table of Contents

potentially settled in, a Company’s own stock to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract.  The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests are adjusted each period so that the carrying value equals the greater of its carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or its redemption fair value.

The consolidated results of the Company include results attributable to units of the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company.  These interests were issued in the form of Operating Partnership units and were a component of the consideration the Company paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities.  Limited partners who acquired Operating Partnership units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their Operating Partnership units for, at the Company’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of the Company or cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Company.  However, the operating agreement contains certain circumstances that could result in a net cash settlement outside the control of the Company, as the Company does not have the ability to settle in unregistered shares .  Accordingly, consistent with the guidance discussed above, the Company will continue to record these non controlling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.  Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest, the Company has reflected these interests at their carrying value as of December 31, 2010.

Noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests. Noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.  The Company has adjusted the carrying value of its noncontrolling interests subject to redemption value to the extent applicable.  Disclosure of such redemption provisions is provided in Note 7.

 

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout these consolidated financial statements, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported results.  The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions and changes in market conditions could im pact our future operating results.

 

Storage Facilities

Storage facilities are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.  The cost of storage facilities reflects their purchase price or development cost.  Costs incurred for the acquisition and renovation of a storage facility are capitalized to the Company’s investment in that property.  Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

F-9



 

Purchase Price Allocation

When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values.  When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.  Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

 

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities. Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts.  Accordingly, to date no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to above-above or

F-10



Table of Contents

below-market lease intangibles.  To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenant relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant tenants and the average tenant turnover is fairly frequent.

On April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which includes the intangible value related to the management contracts as other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  The average estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.9 million.

During 2008, the Company acquired a $6.8self storage facility and allocated approximately $1.0 million to the intangible value of the in-place leases.  This asset to recognizerepresented the value of in-place leases relatedat the time of acquisition and was fully amortized at December 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States.   In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to its acquisitions in 2007.the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.  The estimated life of these in-place leases is 12 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.7 million.

 

Depreciation and Amortization

The costs of self-storage facilities and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method based on useful lives ranging from five to 40 years.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when events and circumstances such as declines in occupancy and operating results indicate that there may be impairment.  The carrying value of these long-lived assets is compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets. Anassets to determine if the property’s basis is recoverable.  If a property’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded ifto the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value based on its undiscounted future net operating cash flows attributable to the asset and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the real estate asset may not be recoverable.value.  The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.  Approximately $2.3 millionThere were no impairment losses recognized in accordance with these procedures during 2010, 2009 and $0.4 million of impairment charges were recorded during 2005 and 2007, respectively.2008.

 

Long-Lived Assets Held for Sale

We consider long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

 

Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant asset is under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing.  In most transactions, these conditions or criteria are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; and, accordingly, the facility is not identified as held for sale until the closing actually occurs.  However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances.  Properties classified as held for sale are reported at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

 

During 2007,2010, the Company sold three16 self-storage facilities throughout California and North Carolina.  During 2009, the Company sold 20 self-storage facilities, including one property that was held for sale as of December 31, 2008.  These 2009 sales occurred in multiple states including California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico and Ohio.  During 2008, the Company sold 23 storage facilities in South Carolinamultiple states including Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York and two additional facilities in Arizona. No facilities were sold during 2006 while four storage facilities located in Ohio were sold during 2005.Ohio.  These sales have been accounted for as discontinued operations and, accordingly, the accompanying financial statements and notes reflect the results of operations of the storage facilities sold as discontinued operations (see Note 10).

 

F-11



Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.  The Company maintainsmay maintain cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believes this risk is mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.

 

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of purchase deposits and cash deposits required for debt service requirements, capital replacement, and expense reserves in connection with the requirements of our loan agreements.

 

F-10



Loan Procurement Costs

Loan procurement costs related to borrowings consist of $10.3were $24.5 million and $10.1$26.4 million at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively and are reported net of accumulated amortization of $4.2$8.8 million and $2.5$8.0 million as of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively. The costs are amortized over the estimated life of the related debt using the effective interest rate method and reported as loan procurement amortization expense.

Marketable Securities

The Company accounts for its investments in debt and equity securities according to the provisions of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, which requires securities classified as “available-for-sale” to be stated at fair value. Adjustments to fair value of available-for-sale securities are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).  A decline in the market value of equity securities below cost, that is deemed to be other than temporary, results in a reduction in the carrying amount to fair value.  The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established.  At December 31, 2005, we had $95.2 million in auction rate securities (“ARS”) and variable rate demand notes classified as available-for-sale securities that were all sold in 2006.  We had no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to these securities during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. All income related to these investments was recorded as interest income.

 

Other Assets

Other assets consist primarily of accounts receivable from tenants, prepaid expenses and intangible assets. Accounts receivable were $2.6$3.2 million and $3.7$2.3 million as of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively. The Company has recorded an allowance of approximately $0.5$0.6 million and $1.0$0.4 million, respectively, related to accounts receivable as of December 31, 2007and 2006.2010 and 2009.  The net carrying value of intangible assets as of December 31, 2007 and 20062010 was $4.6$8.1 million.

Notes Receivable

As of December 31, 2009, notes receivable of $20.1 million and $0.0, respectively.included three promissory notes originated in conjunction withvarious asset dispositions.  The original principal amounts of the promissory notes ranged from $0.3 million to $17.6 million, bearing interest at rates ranging from 6 to 10 percent with maturity dates ranging from two to three years.  All promissory notes were repaid during 2010.

 

Environmental Costs

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  Whenever the environmental assessment for one of our facilities indicates that a facility is impacted by soil or groundwater contamination from prior owners/operators or other sources, we will work with our environmental consultants and where appropriate, state governmental agencies, to ensure that the facility is either cleaned up, that no cleanup is necessary because the low level of contamination poses no significant risk to public health or the environment, or that the responsibility for cleanup rests with a third party.

 

Revenue Recognition

Management has determined that all of our leases are operating leases.  Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month-to-month. Revenues

The Company recognizes gains on disposition of properties only upon closing in accordance with the guidance on sales of real estate.  Payments received from long-term operating leasespurchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits.  Profit on real estate sold is recognized on a straight-line basis overusing the termfull accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the respective lease. The excess of rents received over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leasessales price is included in deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsreasonably assured and contractually due but unpaid rents are included in other assets.

Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities

In October 2006, the Company committedis not obligated to a plan to relocate its accounting, finance and information technology functions toperform significant activities after the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area.  Assale.  Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of the relocation of these functions, the Company provided severance arrangements for certain existing employees related to those functions.  At the time the severance arrangements were entered into, the Company estimated a total expense of $470,000, of which $45,000 was paid in 2006 and the remainder was paid in 2007.

In August 2007, the Company abandoned certain office space in Cleveland, OH that was previously used for its corporate offices.  The related leases have expiration dates ranging from December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2014. Upon vacating the space, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement with a sub-tenant to lease the majority of the space for the duration of the term.

As a result ofprofit recognition on sales under this exit activity, the Company recognized a “Lease abandonment charge” of $1.3 million.  The charge is comprised of approximately $0.8 million of costs that represent the present value of the net cash flows associated with leases and the sub-lease agreement (“Contract Termination Costs”) and approximately $0.5 million of costs associated with the write-off of certain assets related to the abandoned space (“Other Associated Costs”).  The Contract Termination Costs of $0.8 million are presented as “Accounts payable and accrued rent” and the Other Associated Costs of $0.5 million were

F-11



accounted for as a reduction of “Storage facilities.”  The Company will amortize the Contract Termination Costs against rental expense over the remaining life of the respective leases.guidance.

 

Advertising and Marketing Costs

The Company incurs advertising costs primarily attributable to print advertisements in telephone books.internet marketing campaigns and other media advertisements.  The Company recognizes the costs when the related telephone book is first published. The Company recognized $4.3incurred $6.6 million, $4.4$6.5 million and $3.6$6.5 million in advertising and marketing expenses for the years ended 2007, 20062010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively.

 

Equity Offering Costs

Underwriting discountdiscounts and commissions, financial advisory fees and offering costs are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.

 

Other Property Related Income

Other property related income consists of late fees, administrative charges, tenant insurance commissions, sales of storage supplies and other ancillary revenues.revenues and is recognized in the period that it is earned.

F-12



Table of Contents

 

Capitalized Interest

The Company capitalizes interest incurred that is directly associated with construction activities until the asset is placed into service.  Interest is capitalized to the related assets using a weighted-average rate of the Company’s outstanding debt. The Company capitalized $0.1 million during 2007, $0.1 million during 2006each of the years ended 2010, 2009 and did not capitalize any interest during 2005.2008.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

We carryThe Company carries all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.  We determineThe Company determines the fair value of derivatives by reference toobservable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market prices.data.  The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it.  OurThe Company’s use of derivative instruments has been limited to cash flow hedges of certain interest rate risks.  AtAs of December 31, 20072010, the Company had an interest rate cap agreement that effectively limited the LIBOR component of the interest rate on $150 million of credit facility borrowings to 1.50% per annum through January 2011.  Additionally, the Company had interest rate swap agreements for notional principalpri ncipal amounts aggregating $75 million.  The Company had no outstanding derivative contracts$300 million at December 31, 2006.2008 that matured on November 20, 2009.

 

Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code beginning with the period from October 21, 2004 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2004.  In management’s opinion, the requirements to maintain these elections are being met.  Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements other than for operations conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

 

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and the allocation of net income and loss for financial versus tax reporting purposes.  The tax basis in the Company’s assets was $1.5 billion as of December 31, 20072010 and $1.4$1.3 billion as of December 31, 2006.2009.

Distributions to shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, the Company provides each of its shareholders a statement detailing the tax characterization of dividends paid during the preceding year as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of the Company’s distributions for 2010 was 100% ordinary income dividends.

 

The Company is subject to a 4% federal excise tax if sufficient taxable income is not distributed within prescribed time limits.  The excise tax equals 4% of the annual amount, if any, by which the sum of (a) 85% of the Company’s ordinary income and (b) 95% of the Company’s net capital gain exceeds cash distributions and certain taxes paid by the Company.  No excise tax was incurred in 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, or 2005.2008.

 

TRS’sTaxable REIT subsidiaries, such as the TRS, are subject to federal and state income taxes.  The TRS recorded a net deferred tax asset of $0.5 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to expenses which are deductible for tax purposes in future periods.

Minority Interests

Minority Interests include income allocated to holdersperiods of the Operating Partnership Units (the “OP Minority Interests”). Income is allocated to the OP Minority Interests based on their ownership percentage$0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as of the Operating Partnership. This ownership percentage, as well as the total net assets of the Operating Partnership, changes when additional shares of our common stock or Operating Partnership Units are issued. Such changes result in an allocation between shareholders’ equityDecember 31, 2010 and Minority Interests in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Due to the number of such capital transactions that occur each period, we have presented a single net effect of all such allocations for the period as the “Adjustment for Minority Interest in

F-12



Operating Partnership” in our Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Owners’ Equity (Deficit) (rather than separately allocating the minority interest for each individual capital transaction). Additionally, the Company accounts for its minority interests subject to redemption provisions under the “Disclosure Only” approach and accordingly has not adjusted the carrying value of the Company’s minority interests for changes in the fair value of the related redemption provisions.2009.

 

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares and restricted shares outstanding and/or vested during the period.  Diluted earnings per share is calculated by further adjusting for the dilutive impact of share options, unvested restricted shares and contingently issuable shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.  The totalPotentially dilutive impactsecurities calculated under the treasury stock method of these items totaled approximately 22,000, 121,0001,177,000, 547,000 and 83,00094,000 in 2007, 20062010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively, and waswere not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share, unless the inclusion would beas they were identified as anti-dilutive.

 

Share Based Payments

We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our incentive award plan.  Accordingly, share compensation expense wasis recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options.  The Company has elected to recognizerecognized compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period. Additionally, certain restricted shares awarded to Robert J. Amsdell, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, vested immediately upon his retirement from the Company by their terms.  Since he reached the retirement age set forth in his award during 2005, share compensation expense related to this issuance was expensed fully in 2005.

F-13



Table of Contents

 

Foreign Currency

The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. Dollars using the period-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities and an average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, and capital expenditures.  The local currency is the functional currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.  Translation adjustments for foreign subsidiaries are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity.  The Company recognizes transaction gains and losses arising from fluctuations in currency exchange rates on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency in earnings as incurred.  The Pound, which represents the functional currency used by USIFB, LLP, our joint venture in England, was translated at an end-of-period exchange rate of approximately 1.55237 and 1.622 12 U.S. Dollars per Pound at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and an average exchange rate of 1.54576 and 1.56476 U.S. Dollars per Pound for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, theThe FASB issued Statementauthoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (Revised 2007), financial assetsBusiness Combinations (“FAS 141(R)in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance requires entities to provide more information regarding sales of securitized financial assets and similar transactions, particularly if the entity has continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets.  It also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,).  FAS 141(R) establishes principles and changes the requirements for recognizing identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, goodwill acquired in the combination or the gain from a bargain purchase, and disclosure requirements.  Under this revised statement, all costs incurred to effect an acquisition will be recognized separately from the acquisition.  Also, restructuring costs that are expected but the acquirer is not obligated to incur will be recognized separately from the acquisition.  FAS 141(R) is effective for the Company beginning with its quarter ending March 31, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidatedderecognizing financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“FAS 160”).  FAS 160 requires that ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent are clearly identified.  In addition, it requires that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the income statement.  FAS 160 is effective for the Company beginning with its quarter ending March 31, 2009.  The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.  This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 159 on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. This statement clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. SFAS No. 157 establishes a

F-13



fair value hierarchy, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This statement is effective in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.requires additional disclosures.  The Company believes that the adoption of this standard on January 1, 2008 willapplication did not have a material effectan impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretationposition, results of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”).  FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position takenoperations or expected to be taken in a tax return.  FIN 48 also provides guidance on description, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007.cash flows.

 

Operating Segment

The Company has one reportable operating segment; it owns, operates, develops,FASB issued authoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and manages storage facilities.design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.  The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement.  The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial posit ion, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

The storage facilities are located in major metropolitan and rural areas and have numerous tenants per facility.  No single tenant represents 1% or morea significant concentration of the Company’sour revenues.  The facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided total revenues of approximately 19%18%, 15%, 8%10% and 7%, respectively, for the yearyears ended December 31, 2007.  The facilities in Florida, California, Illinois2010 and New Jersey provided total revenues of approximately 19%, 16%, 7% and 6%, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2006.2009.

 

3.  STORAGE FACILITIES

 

The following summarizes the real estate assets of the Company as of December 31, 20072010 and December 31, 2006:2009:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Land

 

$

393,715

 

$

370,196

 

Buildings and improvements

 

1,324,168

 

1,226,690

 

Equipment

 

193,031

 

173,496

 

Construction in progress

 

5,482

 

1,482

 

Total

 

1,916,396

 

1,771,864

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(269,278

)

(205,049

)

Storage facilities — net

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

The carrying value of storage facilities has increased from December 31, 2006 to December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of the 17 acquisitions in 2007. These acquisitions have been allocated to the various asset classes and intangibles disclosed in Note 4 based upon preliminary data and are expected to be finalized during the first half of 2008 once the Company completes its analysis of tangible and intangible values.

F-14



 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Land

 

$

374,569

 

$

369,842

 

Buildings and improvements

 

1,273,938

 

1,243,047

 

Equipment

 

93,571

 

157,452

 

Construction in progress

 

943

 

4,201

 

Total

 

1,743,021

 

1,774,542

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(314,530

)

(344,009

)

Storage facilities — net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

 

The Company completed the following acquisitions, dispositions and consolidations for the years ended December 31, 20062010, 2009 and 2007:2008:

 

 

 

 

 

Total Number of

 

Purchase / Sale Price (in

 

Facility/Portfolio

 

Transaction Date

 

Facilities

 

thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sanford Portfolio

 

January 2007

 

1

 

$

6,300

 

Grand Central Portfolio

 

January 2007

 

2

 

13,200

 

Rising Tide Portfolio

 

September 2007

 

14

 

121,000

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

$

140,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 Dispositions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

South Carolina Assets

 

May 2007

 

3

 

$

12,750

 

Arizona Assets

 

December 2007

 

2

 

6,440

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

$

19,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nashville, TN Portfolio

 

January 2006

 

2

 

$

13,100

 

Dallas, TX Portfolio

 

January 2006

 

2

 

11,500

 

U-Stor Self Storage Portfolio

 

February 2006

 

3

 

10,800

 

Sure Save Portfolio

 

February 2006

 

24

 

164,500

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

March 2006

 

4

 

22,500

 

Nickey Portfolio

 

April 2006

 

4

 

13,600

 

SecurCare Portfolio

 

May 2006

 

4

 

35,700

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

June 2006

 

1

 

6,500

 

Jernigan Portfolio

 

July 2006

 

9

 

45,300

 

U-Stor Self Storage Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

1

 

3,500

 

Bailes Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

3

 

15,600

 

In & Out Self Storage Portfolio

 

August 2006

 

1

 

7,600

 

Texas Storage Portfolio

 

September 2006

 

2

 

12,200

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

$

362,400

 

F-14



Table of Contents

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of Facilities

 

Purchase / Sales
Price (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frisco Asset

 

Frisco, TX

 

July 2010

 

1

 

$

5,800

 

New York City Assets

 

New York, NY

 

September 2010

 

2

 

26,700

 

Northeast Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ, NY and MA

 

November 2010

 

5

 

18,560

 

Manassas Asset

 

Manassas, VA

 

November 2010

 

1

 

6,050

 

Apopka Asset

 

Orlando, FL

 

November 2010

 

1

 

4,235

 

Wyckoff Asset

 

Queens, NY

 

December 2010

 

1

 

13,600

 

McLearen Asset

 

McLearen, VA

 

December 2010

 

1

 

10,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

$

85,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sun City Asset

 

Sun City, CA

 

October 2010

 

1

 

$

3,100

 

Inland Empire/Fayetteville Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA amd NC

 

December 2010

 

15

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

$

38,100

 

2009 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

January 2009

 

1

 

$

2,973

 

Albuquerque, NM Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

April 2009

 

1

 

2,825

 

S. Palmetto Asset

 

Ontario, CA

 

June 2009

 

1

 

5,925

 

Hotel Circle Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

July 2009

 

1

 

3,600

 

Jersey City Asset

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

August 2009

 

1

 

11,625

 

Dale Mabry Asset

 

Tampa, FL

 

August 2009

 

1

 

2,800

 

Winner Assets 1

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

September 2009

 

6

 

17,300

 

Baton Rouge Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

Baton Rouge, LA

 

September 2009

 

 

(b)

1,918

 

North H Street Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

September 2009

 

1

 

 

(c)

Boulder Assets (a)

 

Boulder, CO

 

September 2009

 

4

 

32,000

 

Winner Assets 2

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

October 2009

 

2

 

6,600

 

Brecksville Asset

 

Brecksville, OH

 

November 2009

 

1

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

90,866

 

2008 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uptown Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

January 2008

 

1

 

$

13,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

$

2,175

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

2,400

 

Lakeland Asset

 

Lakeland, FL

 

April 2008

 

1

 

2,050

 

Endicott Asset

 

Union, NY

 

May 2008

 

1

 

2,250

 

Linden Asset

 

Linden, NJ

 

June 2008

 

1

 

2,825

 

Baton Rouge/Prairieville Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA

 

June 2008

 

2

 

5,400

 

Churchill Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS

 

August 2008

 

4

 

8,333

 

Biloxi/Gulf Breeze Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS/FL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

10,760

 

Deland Asset

 

Deland, FL

 

September 2008

 

1

 

2,780

 

Mobile Assets

 

Mobile, AL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

6,140

 

Hudson Assets

 

Hudson, OH

 

October 2008

 

2

 

2,640

 

Stuart/Vero Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

October 2008

 

2

 

4,550

 

Skipper Road Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2008

 

2

 

5,020

 

Waterway Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

December 2008

 

1

 

4,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

$

61,958

 

 

The following table summarizes the change in numberF-15



Table of self-storage facilities from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2007:Contents

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Balance - Beginning of year

 

399

 

339

 

Facilities acquired

 

17

 

60

 

Facilities consolidated

 

(2

)

 

Facilities sold

 

(5

)

 

Balance - End of year

 

409

 

399

 


(a)The Company provided $17.6 million in seller financing to the buyer as part of the Boulder Assets disposition, which was subsequently repaid during 2010.

(b)Approximately one third of the Baton Rouge Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings.  The Company continues to own and operate the remaining two thirds of the asset and include the asset in the Company’s total portfolio property count.

(c)The entirety of the North H Street Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings and the Company removed this asset from its total portfolio asset count.  The Company expects to finalize compensatory terms with the State of California in 2011.

 

4.  INTANGIBLE ASSETSACQUISITIONS

 

In conjunction withOn April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The 85 management contracts relate to facilities located in 16 states and the District of Columbia.  The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which includes the intangible value related to the management contracts as other assets, net on the Company’s 2007 acquisitions,consolidated balance sheet.  The Company’s estimate of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities utilized Level 3 inputs and considered the probability of the expected period the contracts would remain in place, including estimated renewal periods, and the amount of the discounted estimated future contingent payments to be made.  The Company paid $4.1 million in cash for the c ontracts and recognized $1.8 million in contingent consideration.  The Company records changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability in earnings.  The Company has recognized $0.9 million of amortization during 2010.  The Company expensed $0.3 million in transaction related costs during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that are included in acquisition related costs on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.  The average estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company hasacquired a self storage facility and allocated a portionapproximately $1.0 million to the intangible value of the purchase price to finite-lived intangible assets related toin-place leases.  This asset represented the value of in-place leases valued at approximately $6.8 million.the time of acquisition.  The estimated life of this asset at the time of acquisition was 12 months.  The Company recognized approximately $2.2 million of amortization expense related to this asset of $0.1 million and $0.9 million during 2007.  The amortization period of these assets is 12 months2009 and the estimated remaining amortization expense that will be recognized during 2008, is $4.6 million.respectively.

 

F-15During 2010, the Company acquired 12 self storage facilities and allocated an aggregate of approximately $3.7 million to the intangible value of the in-place leases.  These assets represent the value of in-place leases at the time of acquisition.  The Company recognized amortization expense related to these assets of $0.7 million during 2010.



Refer to Note 3 for facility details of the 2010, 2009 and 2008 acquisitions.

 

5.  REVOLVINGSECURED CREDIT FACILITY, UNSECURED CREDIT FACILITY AND UNSECUREDSECURED TERM LOANLOANS

 

As ofOn December 31, 2007,8, 2009, the Company and its operating partnership hadOperating Partnership entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “Secured Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million secured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility.  The Secured Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in place athe Secured Credit Facility agreement).  The Secured Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facility, which was entered into in November 2006, includingand consisted of a $200 million in an unsecured term loan and $250 million in unsecured revolving loans.  The outstanding balance on the Company’s credit facility was $419 million and was comprised of $200 million of term loan borrowings and $219 million of unsecured revolving loans.  As of December 31, 2007, approximately $31 million was available under the Company’s credit facility.  Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio or our credit rating.  The alternative base interest rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the higher of the prime rate or the sum of the federal funds effective rate plus 50 basis points.  The applicable margin for the alternative base rate will vary from 0.00% to 0.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grade rating, and will vary from 0.00% to 0.25% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.  The Eurodollar rate is a rate of interest that is fixed for interest periods of one, two, three or six months based on the LIBOR rate determined two business days prior to the commencement of the applicable interest period.  The applicable margin for the Eurodollar rate will vary from 1.00% to 1.50% depending on our leverage ratio prior to achieving an investment grate rating, and will vary from 0.425% to 1.00% depending on our credit rating after achieving an investment grade rating.  This credit facility is scheduled to terminate on November 20, 2009, with an option for the Company to extend the termination date to November 20, 2010. At December 31, 2007,All borrowings under the unsecured credit facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, the Company amended the Secured Credit Facility.  The amended credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The Credit Facility has a three-year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the Company’s leverage levels plus LIBOR.  The Company incurred $2.5 million in connection with executing this amendment and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

At December 31, 2010, $200.0 million of unsecured term loan borrowings and $43.0 million of unsecured revolving credit facility were outstanding under the Credit Facility and $207.0 million was available for borrowing under the Credit Facility. 

F-16



Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, borrowings under the Credit Facility had a weighted average interest rate of 6.06%.3.8% and the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

 

On September 14, 2007, the Company and its Operating Partnership entered into a secured term loan agreement that allows for term loans in the aggregate principal amount of up to $50 million. Each term loan matures on November 20, 2009, subject to extension in the sole discretion of the lenders. Each term loan bears interest at either an alternative base rate or a Eurodollar rate, at our option, in each case plus an applicable margin at terms identical to the unsecured revolving credit facility.  As of December 31, 2007, there was one term loan outstanding for $47.4 million.  The outstanding term loan is secured by a pledge by our Operating Partnership of all equity interests in YSI RT LLC, the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Operating Partnership that acquired eight self-storage facilities in September 2007, that had a net book value of approximately $62.1 million at December 31, 2007.  At December 31, 2007, the outstanding term loan had an interest rate of 6.18%.

The November 2006 credit facility effectively replaced the former $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility that was established in February 2006 and a $50 million term loan that was entered into and terminated during November 2006.  The former credit facility had a balance of $240.5 million and was scheduled to terminate in February 2009 prior to being replaced.

The February 2006 unsecured revolving credit facility replaced the Company’s existing $150.0 million facility, which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2005 and was scheduled to terminate in October 2007.

F-16F-17



Table of Contents

 

6.  MORTGAGE LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE

 

The Company’s mortgage loans and notes payable are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Carrying Value as of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Effective

 

Maturity

 

Mortgage Loan

 

2010

 

2009

 

Interest Rate

 

Date

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

YSI 1

 

$

 

$

83,342

 

5.19

%

May-10

 

YSI 4

 

 

6,065

 

5.25

%

Jul-10

 

YSI 26

 

 

9,475

 

5.00

%

Aug-10

 

YSI 25

 

 

7,975

 

5.00

%

Oct-10

 

YSI 2

 

 

83,480

 

5.33

%

Jan-11

 

YSI 12

 

1,477

 

1,520

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI 13

 

1,270

 

1,307

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI 6

 

76,137

 

77,370

 

5.13

%

Aug-12

 

YASKY

 

80,000

 

80,000

 

4.96

%

Sep-12

 

YSI 14

 

1,759

 

1,812

 

5.97

%

Jan-13

 

YSI 7

 

3,100

 

3,163

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 8

 

1,771

 

1,808

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 9

 

1,948

 

1,988

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 17

 

4,121

 

4,246

 

6.32

%

Jul-13

 

YSI 27

 

499

 

516

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI 30

 

7,316

 

7,567

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI 11

 

2,420

 

2,486

 

5.87

%

Dec-13

 

USIFB

 

3,726

 

3,834

 

4.80

%

Dec-13

 

YSI 5

 

3,193

 

3,281

 

5.25

%

Jan-14

 

YSI 28

 

1,555

 

1,598

 

5.59

%

Feb-14

 

YSI 34

 

14,823

 

14,955

 

8.00

%

Jun-14

 

YSI 37

 

2,210

 

2,244

 

7.25

%

Aug-14

 

YSI 40

 

2,520

 

2,581

 

7.25

%

Aug-14

 

YSI 44

 

1,095

 

1,121

 

7.00

%

Sep-14

 

YSI 41

 

3,879

 

3,976

 

6.60

%

Sep-14

 

YSI 38

 

3,973

 

4,078

 

6.35

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 45

 

5,443

 

5,527

 

6.75

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 46

 

3,430

 

3,486

 

6.75

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 43

 

2,919

 

2,994

 

6.50

%

Nov-14

 

YSI 48

 

25,270

 

25,652

 

7.25

%

Nov-14

 

YSI 50

 

2,322

 

2,380

 

6.75

%

Dec-14

 

YSI 10

 

4,091

 

4,166

 

5.87

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 15

 

1,877

 

1,920

 

6.41

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 20

 

62,459

 

64,258

 

5.97

%

Nov-15

 

YSI 31

 

13,660

 

13,891

 

6.75

%

Jun-19

(a)

YSI 35

 

4,499

 

4,499

 

6.90

%

Jul-19

(a)

YSI 32

 

6,058

 

6,160

 

6.75

%

Jul-19

(a)

YSI 33

 

11,370

 

11,570

 

6.42

%

Jul-19

 

YSI 42

 

3,184

 

3,263

 

6.88

%

Sep-19

(a)

YSI 39

 

3,931

 

3,991

 

6.50

%

Sep-19

(a)

YSI 47

 

3,176

 

3,250

 

6.63

%

Jan-20

(a)

Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

(24

)

231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

372,457

 

$

569,026

 

 

 

 

 

F-18

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective Interest

 

 

 

 

 

Carrying Value as of:

 

Rate on

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Maturity

 

Mortgage Loan

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

Date

 

 

 

(in thousands )

 

 

 

 

 

YSI XXIII

 

$

 

$

1,322

 

5.00

%

Jul-07

 

YSI XVI

 

 

14,261

 

6.49

%

Nov-07

 

YSI XXII

 

 

993

 

5.00

%

Nov-07

 

YSI XXIX

 

 

4,374

 

5.00

%

Jan-08

 

YSI XXI

 

 

1,217

 

5.00

%

Apr-08

 

Acq IV

 

2,359

 

2,425

 

7.71

%

Dec-08

 

Acq VI

 

1,746

 

1,787

 

8.43

%

Aug-09

 

YSI III

 

86,712

 

88,332

 

5.09

%

Nov-09

 

YSI I

 

86,770

 

88,362

 

5.19

%

May-10

 

YSI IV

 

6,227

 

6,299

 

5.25

%

Jul-10

 

YSI XXV

 

8,201

 

8,304

 

5.00

%

Oct-10

 

YSI XXVI

 

9,956

 

10,176

 

5.00

%

Oct-10

 

Promissory Notes

 

92

 

132

 

5.97

%

Nov-10

 

YSI II

 

86,843

 

88,400

 

5.33

%

Jan-11

 

YSI XII

 

1,599

 

1,634

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI XIII

 

1,374

 

1,404

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI VI

 

79,645

 

80,000

 

5.13

%

Aug-12

 

YASKY

 

80,000

 

80,000

 

4.96

%

Sep-12

 

USIFB

 

4,651

 

 

7.10

%

Oct-12

 

YSI XIV

 

1,909

 

1,952

 

5.97

%

Jan-13

 

YSI VII

 

3,280

 

3,334

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI VIII

 

1,874

 

1,905

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI IX

 

2,062

 

2,096

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI XVII

 

4,477

 

4,583

 

6.32

%

Jul-13

 

YSI XXVII

 

547

 

561

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI XXX

 

8,024

 

8,233

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI XI

 

2,605

 

2,660

 

5.87

%

Dec-13

 

YSI V

 

3,440

 

3,513

 

5.25

%

Jan-14

 

YSI XXVIII

 

1,676

 

1,712

 

5.59

%

Feb-14

 

YSI X

 

4,303

 

4,367

 

5.87

%

Jan-15

 

YSI XV

 

1,999

 

2,035

 

6.41

%

Jan-15

 

YSI XX

 

67,545

 

71,050

 

5.97

%

Nov-15

 

Unamortized premiums

 

1,141

 

1,507

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

561,057

 

$

588,930

 

 

 

 

 



Table of Contents


(a)These borrowings have a fixed interest rate for the first five years of their term, which then resets and remains constant over the final five years of the loan term.

 

As of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, the Company’s mortgage loans payable were collateralizedsecured by certain of its self-storage facilities with net book values of approximately $725$540 million $795and $776 million, respectively.

F-17



The following table presented below represents the future principal payment requirements on the outstanding mortgage loans and notes payable at December 31, 2007:2010 (in thousands):

 

2008

 

$

11,541

 

2009

 

94,425

 

2010

 

112,497

 

2011

 

88,180

 

2012

 

162,347

 

2013 and thereafter

 

90,926

 

Total mortgage payments

 

559,916

 

Plus: Unamortized debt premiums

 

1,141

 

Total mortgage indebtedness

 

$

561,057

 

2011

 

$

8,893

 

2012

 

159,984

 

2013

 

29,966

 

2014

 

91,058

 

2015

 

60,095

 

2016 and thereafter

 

22,485

 

Total mortgage payments

 

372,481

 

Plus: Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

(24

)

Total mortgage indebtedness

 

$

372,457

 

 

The Company currently intends to fund its 2011 future principal payment requirements from cash provided by operating activities.

7.  MINORITYNONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

OperatingVariable Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

On August 13, 2009, the Company, through a wholly-owned affiliate, formed a joint venture (“HART”) with an affiliate of Heitman, LLC (“Heitman”) to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities, which are located throughout the United States.  Upon formation, Heitman contributed approximately $51 million of cash to a newly-formed limited partnership minority interests relateand the Company contributed certain unencumbered wholly-owned properties with an agreed upon value of approximately $102 million to such limited partnership.  In exchange for its contribution of those properties, the Company received a cash distribution from HART of approximately $51 million and retained a 50% interest in HART.  The Company is the managing partner of HART and the manager of the properties owned by HART in exchange for a market rate management fee.

The Company determined that HART is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of HART.  The 50% interest that is owned by Heitman is reflected as noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries within permanent equity, separate from the Company’s equity on the consolidated balance sheets.  At December 31, 2010, HART had total assets of $89.5 million, including $87.3 million of storage facilities, net and total liabilities of $2.3 million.

USIFB, LLP (“the Venture”) was formed to own, operate, acquire and develop self-storage facilities in England.  The Company owns a 97% interest in the Venture through a wholly-owned subsidiary and the Venture commenced operations at two facilities in London, England during 2008.  The Company determined that the Venture is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Venture.  At December 31, 2010, the Venture had total assets of $11.3 million and total liabilities of $4.0 million including a mortgage loan of $3.7 million secured by storage facilities with a net book value of $3.5 million.  At December 31, 2010, the Venture’s creditors had no recourse to the general credit of the Company.

Operating Partnership Ownership

The Company has followed the FASB guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities.  Under this guidance, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets, at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity.  This classification results in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the operating partnershipconsolidated balance sheets.  The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to

F-19



Table of Contents

redemption provisions.  Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the redemption by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the guidance regarding accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own shares, to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to presume share settlement.  The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests classified outside of permanent equity be adjusted each period to the greater of the carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or the redemption value.

The consolidated results of the Company include results attributable to units of the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company, which at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, amounted to approximately 8.1%, 8.3% and 8.4%, respectively.  These minority interests were issued in the form4.6% of all outstanding Operating Partnership units as of December 31, 2010 and 4.9% of all outstanding Operating Partnership units as of December 31, 2009.  The interests in the Operating Partnership represented by these units were a component of the consideration that the Company paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities.  LimitedThe holders of the units are limited partners who acquiredin the Operating Partnership unitsand have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their Operating Partnership units for, at the Company’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of the Company or cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Company.  The market valueHowever, the partnership agreement contains certain provisions that could result in a settlement outside the control of the Company’s common shares for this purposeCompany, as the Company does not have the ability to settle in unregistered shares.  Accordingly, consistent with the guidance, the Company will berecord these noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss attributable to the Company in the consolidated statements of operations.

The per unit cash redemption amount would equal to the average of the closing trading priceprices of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days beforeending prior to the date the Company receivedCompany’s receipt of the redemption notice.  As ofnotice for the applicable unit.  At December 31, 2007,2010 and December 31, 2009, 4,737,136 and 4,809,636 units were outstanding, respectively, and the calculated aggregate redemption value of outstanding Operating Partnership units based upon the Company’s stock price was approximately $49.4 million.

Number of limited

partnership units

As of December 31, 2006

5,198,855

Units issued

Units redeemed, May 2007

(15,000

)

Units redeemed, June 2007

(60,000

)

Units redeemed, August 2007

(43,927

)

As of December 31, 2007

5,079,928

In conjunction withaverage closing share prices.  Based on the formationCompany’s evaluation of the Company, certain former owners contributed facilities to the operating partnership and received units in the operating partnership concurrently with the closing of the IPO. Limited partners who acquired operating partnership units in the Formation Transactions have the right, effective October 27, 2005, to require the operating partnership to redeem part or all of their operating partnership units for cash or, at the Company’s option, common shares, based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of common shares for which the operating partnership units would have been redeemed if the Company had assumed and satisfied the operating partnership’s obligation by paying common shares. The marketredemption value of the Company’s common shares for this purpose will be equal to the average of the closing trading price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days before the day on whichredeemable noncontrolling interest, the Company receivedhas reflected these interests at their redemption value as of December 31, 2010, as the estimated redemption notice. Upon consummationvalue exceeded their carrying value at December 31, 2010, by recording a $1.5 million increase to non-controlling interests w ith a corresponding decrease to shareholders’ equity.  As of the IPO,December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the net assets ofnoncontrolling interests exceeded the operating partnership was allocated to minority interests. Pursuant to three contribution agreements and three option exercises in 2005, entities owned by the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and one of its former Trustees received an aggregate of 1,524,358 operating partnership units for six facilities with a net historical basis of $7.3 million.

In conjunction with the National Self Storage acquisition, National Self Storage received 3,674,497 operating partnership units. As provided in the partnership agreement of the operating partnership, these units are redeemable by the unitholders for cash or, at the Company’s option, common shares, beginning one year after the date of issuance (i.e., effective July 2006), on a one-for-one basis. The National Self Storage acquisition purchase agreement also included a provision which granted the

F-18



sellers a special redemption right permitting the sellers, under certain circumstances, beginning one year after issuance of the units, to redeem a portion of their units by requiring the Company to purchase, and simultaneously transfer to them, real estate properties to be identified by them at a price equal to the fair value of units redeemed (the “Special Redemption Right”).

The units issued to National Self Storage were considered conditionally redeemable because they were redeemable at the option of the holder with no specified or determinable redemption date. The units had no preference to the Company’s other outstanding operating partnership units. Under the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities, D-98R (“EITF D-98R”), the Company classified these units as a separate minority interest line item (“Conditionally Redeemable Operating Partnership Units”) and elected the accretion method under EITF D-98R to record increases or decreases in theestimated redemption value of such units (as of September 30, 2005) as anso no adjustment to retained earnings over the period from the date of issuance to the earliest redemption date. On October 25, 2005, the sellers in the National Self Storage transaction agreed to terminate the Special Redemption Right, effective as of July 15, 2005 (the first date on which National Self Storage facilities were acquired by the operating partnership under the purchase agreement). Upon termination of the Special Redemption Right, the Company classified these units in minority interest. The amount of accretion recorded through October 25, 2005 was approximately $3.0 million.required.

 

8.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

Robert J. Amsdell, former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, retired from the Board effective as of February 13, 2007.  Barry L. Amsdell submitted his letter of resignation from the Board on February 20, 2007.  Effective as of February 19, 2007, Todd C. Amsdell, President of U-Store-It Development LLC, a subsidiary of the Company, resigned.

Amsdell Settlement/Rising Tide Acquisition

On September 14, 2007, the Company settled all pending state and federal court litigation involving the Company and the interests of Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell and Kyle Amsdell, son of Robert and brother of Todd Amsdell (collectively, the “Amsdells”), and Rising Tide Development LLC, a company owned and controlled by Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell (“Rising Tide”).  The Board of Trustees of the Company, along with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, approved the terms of the settlement.

In addition, on September 14, 2007, the Operating Partnership purchased 14 self-storage facilities from Rising Tide (the “Rising Tide Properties”) for an aggregate purchase price of $121 million pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement.  In connection with the settlement agreement and acquisition of the 14 self storage facilities, the Company considered the provisions of EITF 04-01, Accounting for Pre-existing relationships between the Parties to a Business Combination, and determined that all consideration paid was allocable to the purchase of the storage facilities.

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, dated August 6, 2007, (the “Settlement Agreement”) which was conditioned upon the acquisition of the 14 self-storage facilities from Rising Tide for $121 million, each of the parties to the agreement executed various agreements.  A summary of the various agreements follows:

·Standstill Agreement.  Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell agreed that through June 30, 2008, they would not commence or participate in any proxy solicitation or initiate any shareholder proposal; take any action to convene a meeting of shareholders; or take any actions, including making any public or private proposal or announcement, that could result in an extraordinary corporate transaction relating to the Company.

·First Amendment to Lease.  The Operating Partnership and Amsdell and Amsdell, an entity owned by Robert and Barry Amsdell, entered into a First Amendment to Lease which modified certain terms of all of the lease agreements the Operating Partnership has with Amsdell and Amsdell for office space in Cleveland, Ohio.  The First Amendment provided the Operating Partnership the ability to assign or sublease the office space previously used for its corporate office and certain operations.  Separately, Amsdell and Amsdell consented to the Operating Partnership’s proposed sublease to an unrelated party of approximately 22,000 square feet of office space covered by the aforementioned leases.

·Termination of Option Agreement.  The Operating Partnership and Rising Tide entered into an Option Termination Agreement that terminated an Option Agreement dated October 27, 2004, by and between the Operating Partnership and Rising Tide.  The Option Agreement provided the Operating Partnership with an option to acquire

F-19



Rising Tide’s right, title and interest to 18 properties, including:  the 14 Rising Tide Properties discussed above; three properties that the Operating Partnership acquired in 2005 pursuant to exercise of its option; and one undeveloped property that Rising Tide has the option to acquire and that was not acquired as a part of the purchase and sale agreement.

·Termination of Property Management Agreement, and Marketing and Ancillary Services Agreement.  Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and Rising Tide entered into a Property Management Termination Agreement and a Marketing and Ancillary Services Termination Agreement. Under the Property Management Agreement, the Company provided property management services for the Rising Tide Properties for a fee equal to the greater of 5.35% of the gross revenues of each property or $1,500 per property per month.  Under the Marketing and Ancillary Services Agreement, the Company provided limited marketing and other miscellaneous services for the Rising Tide properties.  Management fees earned by YSI Management LLC, from Rising Tide Development, were approximately $0.4 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are included in other related party revenues. Accounts receivable from Rising Tide Development at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and are included in due from related parties. No amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2007.  These amounts represent expenses paid on behalf of Rising Tide Development by YSI Management LLC and proceeds from the sale of ancillary items that were reimbursed under standard business terms.  In connection with the termination of the Property Management Agreement, expenses relating to property management will be prorated.

·Amendment of Employment and Non-Compete Agreements.  As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Company entered into a Modification of Noncompetition Agreement and Termination of Employment Agreement (each a “Modification of Noncompetition Agreement and Termination of Employment Agreement”) with each of Robert J. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell, and a Modification of Noncompetition Agreement (“Modification of Noncompetition Agreement”) with Barry L. Amsdell, which terminates and modifies specific provisions of the noncompetition agreement the Company has with each of them, dated October 27, 2004 (the “Original Noncompetition Agreements”).  The Original Noncompetition Agreements restrict the ability of Robert J., Barry L. and Todd C. Amsdell to compete with the Company for one year and their ability to solicit employees of the Company for two years from the date of their termination of employment or resignation from service as a Trustee.  Pursuant to these modification agreements, Todd C. Amsdell will be able to compete with the Company, and Robert J. and Barry L. Amsdell will be able to (a) develop the one Rising Tide property that the Company did not acquire under the purchase and sale agreement and (b) compete with respect to any property identified as part of a Section 1031 “like-kind exchange” referenced in the purchase and sale agreement.  Further, each Original Noncompetition Agreement was modified to allow each of them to hire, for any purpose, any employee or independent contractor who was terminated, has resigned or otherwise left the employment or other service of the Company or any of its affiliates on or prior to June 1, 2007.

The Modification and Noncompetition Agreement and Termination of Employment Agreement with each of Robert J. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell also terminates the employment agreements the Company had with each of them, effective as of February 13, 2007 with respect to Robert J. Amsdell and February 19, 2007 with respect to Todd C. Amsdell.

Additional Acquisitions of Facilities

The Company, in accordance with a contract signed on April 3, 2006, acquired nine self-storage facilities from Jernigan Property Group on July 27, 2006 for consideration of approximately $45.3 million. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dean Jernigan, served as President of Jernigan Property Group. Mr. Jernigan has agreed that he will not expand his interest, ownership or activity in the self-storage business. Given Mr. Jernigan’s appointment as a Trustee and the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on April 24, 2006, this transaction was subject to review and final approval by a majority of the independent members of the Company’s Board of Trustees.

Construction Services

Historically, the Company engaged Amsdell Construction, a company owned by Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, to maintain and improve its self-storage facilities.  The total payments incurred by the Company to Amsdell Construction for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $42,000 and $304,000, respectively.  The Company did not engage Amsdell Construction during 2007.

F-20



Corporate Office Leases

PursuantSubsequent to its entry into lease agreements thatwith related parties for office space, the Operating Partnership entered into sublease agreements with Amsdell and Amsdell during 2005 and 2006, we rentedvarious unrelated tenants for the related office space from Amsdell and Amsdell at The Parkview Building, a multi-tenant office building of approximately 40,000 square feet located at 6745 Engle Road, an office building of approximately 18,000 square feet located at 6751 Engle Road, and an office building of approximately 28,000 square feet located at 6779 Engle Road.space.  Each of these properties is part of Airport Executive Park, a 50-acre office and flex development located in Cleveland, Ohio, which is owned by Amsdell and Amsdell.former executives. Our independent Trustees approved the terms of, and entry into, each of the office lease agreements by the Operating Partnership.  The table below shows the office space subject to these lease agreements and certain key provisions, including the term of each lease agreement, the period for which the Operating Partnership may extend the term of each lease agreement, and the minimum and maximum rents payable per month during the term.

 

Office Space

 

Approximate
 Square Footage

 

Term

 

Period of
Extension Option (1)

 

Fixed Minimum
Rent Per Month

 

Fixed
Maximum Rent
Per Month

 

 

Approximate
Square Footage

 

Term

 

Period of
Extension Option (1)

 

Fixed Minimum
Rent Per Month

 

Fixed
Maximum Rent
Per Month

 

The Parkview Building — 6745
Engle Road; and 6751 Engle Road

 

21,900

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

25,673

 

$

31,205

 

 

21,900

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

25,673

 

$

31,205

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 100

 

2,212

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,051

 

$

3,709

 

 

2,212

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,051

 

$

3,709

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 110

 

1,731

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

2,387

 

$

2,901

 

 

1,731

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

2,387

 

$

2,901

 

6751 Engle Road — Suites C and D

 

3,000

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,137

 

$

3,771

 

 

3,000

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,137

 

$

3,771

 

6779 Engle Road — Suites G and H

 

3,500

 

12/31/2008

 

Five-year

 

$

3,079

 

$

3,347

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 120

 

1,600

 

4/30/2007

 

Three-year

 

$

1,800

 

$

1,900

 

6779 Engle Road — Suites I and J

 

3,500

 

(2)

 

N/A

 

$

3,700

 

N/A

 

 


(1)          Our operating partnershipOperating Partnership may extend the lease agreement beyond the termination date by the period set forth in this column at prevailing market rates upon the same terms and conditions contained in each of the lease agreements.

 

(2)In June 2007, the Operating Partnership terminated this lease agreement which had a month-to-month term.

In addition to monthly rent, the office lease agreements provide that our Operating Partnership reimburse Amsdell and Amsdell for certain maintenance and improvements to the leased office space.  The total amounts of lease payments incurred under the six office

F-20



Table of Contents

leases during the years ended December 31, 20072010 and December 31, 20062009 were approximately $0.4$0.5 million and $0.5$0.3 million, respectively.

 

Total future minimum rental payments underdue in accordance with the related party lease agreements entered intoand total future cash receipts due from our subtenants as of December 31, 20072010 are as follows:

 

 

 

Related Party

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

$

468

 

2009

 

453

 

2010

 

453

 

2011

 

475

 

2012

 

475

 

2013 and thereafter

 

998

 

 

 

$

3,322

 

Aircraft Lease

The Company chartered an aircraft from Aqua Sun Investments, L.L.C. (“Aqua Sun”), a company owned by Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell. The Company was under contract pursuant to a timesharing agreement to reimburse Aqua Sun at the rate of $1,250 for each hour of use of the aircraft and the payment of certain expenses associated with the use of the aircraft. As described in the paragraph below, effective June 30, 2005 the timesharing agreement was terminated by

F-21



mutual agreement of the parties thereto and was replaced on July 1, 2005 with a non-exclusive aircraft lease agreement with Aqua Sun (the “Aircraft Lease”). The Company’s disinterested Trustees approved the terms of, and the entry into, the non-exclusive aircraft lease agreement by the operating partnership.

The Operating Partnership was able to lease for corporate use from time to time an airplane owned by Aqua Sun at an hourly rate of $1,450 per flight hour. Aqua Sun was responsible for various costs associated with operation of the airplane, including insurance, storage and maintenance and repair, but the Operating Partnership was responsible for fuel costs and the costs of pilots and other cabin personnel required for its use of the airplane. The Aircraft Lease, which was effective as of July 1, 2005, had a one-year term and was terminated on June 30, 2006. The total amounts incurred for such aircraft charters described above by the Company for 2006 and 2005 was approximately $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. No amounts were incurred after June 30, 2006 when the lease was terminated.

 

 

Due to Related Party

 

Due from Subtenant

 

 

 

Amount

 

Amount

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

$

475

 

$

314

 

2012

 

475

 

314

 

2013

 

499

 

314

 

2014

 

499

 

315

 

 

 

$

1,948

 

$

1,257

 

 

Other

During 2006 and 2007,the third quarter of 2009, the Company engagedentered into a consultant to assist us in establishing certain development protocols and processes. In connectionrelocation transaction with that assignment, our outside consultant utilizeda member of management whereby the servicesCompany purchased the former residence of Dean Jernigan’s son-in-law. Our paymentsthe member of management for his son-in-law’s services totaled approximately $149,000 in 2007 and $4,750 in 2006.

$985,000 which was recorded as a component of other assets.  The Company engaged Dunlevy Building Systems Inc., a company owned by John Dunlevy, a brother-in-law of Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, for construction, zoning consultant and general contractor services at certain of its self-storage facilities. The total payments incurred bysold the Company to Dunlevy Building Systems Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were approximately $19,000 and $40,000, respectively.  No amounts were incurred subsequent to June 30, 2006.

The Company engaged Deborah Dunlevy Designs, a company owned by Deborah Dunlevy, a sister of Robert J. Amsdell and Barry L. Amsdell, for interior design services at certain of its self-storage facilities and offices. Total payments incurred by the Company to Deborah Dunlevy Designs for the year ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $56,000.  No amounts were incurred subsequent to December 31, 2005.

Registration Rights

Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell and the “Amsdell Entities” that acquired common shares or Operating Partnership units in the formation transactions which took place at the time of the IPO received certain registration rights. An aggregate of approximately 9.7 million common shares acquired in the formation transactions were subject to a registration rights agreement (including approximately 1.1 million shares issuable upon redemption of approximately 1.1 million Operating Partnership units issued in the formation transactions).

In addition, Rising Tide Development received registration rights with respect to the Operating Partnership units it received in connection with the Company’s acquisition of three option facilities. An aggregate of approximately 0.4 million common shares (which shares are issuable upon redemption of approximately 0.4 million Operating Partnership units issued in connection with the Company’s option exercises) were subject to a registration rights agreement.

In March 2007, the Company filed a Registration Statementasset on Form S-3 to satisfy all of the abovementioned registration rights.September 10, 2010.

 

9.  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The fair valuevalues of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their respective book values at December 31, 20072010 and 2006.2009.  The Company hashad fixed interest rate loans with a carrying value of $556.4$372.5 million and $588.9$569.0 million at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.  The estimated fair values of these fixed rate loans were $533.2$351.8 million and $569.6$530.7 million at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.  The Company hashad variable interest rate loans with a carrying value of $471.1$243.0 million and $290.5$200.0 million at December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.  The estimated fair values of the variable interest rate loans were $452.7 millionapproximate their carrying values due to their floating rate nature and $290.5 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.market spreads.  These estimates are based on discounted cash flow analyses assuming market interestintere st rates for comparable obligations at December 31, 20072010 and 2006.2009.

F-22



 

10.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

During 2005,For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, discontinued operations relates to 16 properties that the Company sold four of its storage facilities located in Ohioduring 2010, 20 properties that were acquired as part of the Liberty Self-Stor Portfolio acquisition for net proceeds of $6.2 million.  No facilities were sold in 2006.  In 2007 the Company sold threeduring 2009 (one of which was held-for-sale at December 31, 2008), and 23 properties that the Company sold during 2008 (see Note 3).  Each of the sales during 2010, 2009, and 2008 resulted in South Carolina for $12.8the recognition of a gain, which in the aggregate totaled $1.8 million, $14.1 million, and two properties in Arizona for $6.4 million.$19.7 million, respectively.

 

The results offollowing table summarizes the revenue and expense information for the period the Company owned the properties classified as discontinued operations ofduring the storage facilities through the sale date have been presented in the following table. Interest expenseyears ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and related amortization of loan procurement costs have been attributed to the sold storage facilities as applicable based upon the transaction and included in discontinued operations.2008 (in thousands):

 

The resultsF-21



Table of operations of the nine storage facilities sold during 2005 and 2007 were as follows:Contents

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

1,507

 

$

2,425

 

$

2,579

 

Other property related income

 

58

 

86

 

 

Total revenues

 

1,565

 

2,511

 

2,579

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

835

 

1,132

 

943

 

Depreciation

 

441

 

650

 

638

 

Total operating expenses

 

1,276

 

1,782

 

1,581

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

289

 

729

 

998

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(189

)

(497

)

(535

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(3

)

(26

)

(12

)

Interest income

 

5

 

5

 

1

 

Other

 

 

(3

)

 

Total other expense

 

(187

)

(521

)

(546

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

102

 

208

 

452

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

2,517

 

 

179

 

Minority interest attributable to discontinued

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

operations

 

(215

)

(17

)

(42

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

2,404

 

$

191

 

$

589

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

5,707

 

$

13,496

 

$

23,775

 

Other property related income

 

591

 

1,131

 

1,829

 

Total revenues

 

6,298

 

14,627

 

25,604

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

2,581

 

5,352

 

9,499

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,711

 

4,444

 

6,886

 

Total operating expenses

 

4,292

 

9,796

 

16,385

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

3,832

 

$

18,970

 

$

28,939

 

 

11.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has capital lease obligations for security camera systems with a cost of $2.6 million. These systems are included in equipment in the accompanying balance sheet and are being depreciated over five years.

 

The Company currently owns one self-storage facility subject to a ground lease and five self-storage facilities having small parcels of land that are subject to ground leases. The Company recorded ground rent expense of approximately $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2007, 20062010, 2009 and 2005,2008, respectively.

F-23



Total future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable ground leases and related party office leases in effect as ofare $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 are as follows:2011 through December 31, 2014.

 

 

Third Party 
Amount

 

Related Party
Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008

 

$

76

 

$

468

 

2009

 

50

 

453

 

2010

 

44

 

453

 

2011

 

44

 

475

 

2012 and thereafter

 

155

 

1,473

 

 

 

$

369

 

$

3,322

 

 

The Company has been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits in the ordinary course of business.  In most instances, these claims are covered by the Company’s liability insurance coverage.  Management believes that the ultimate settlement of the suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

12.  RISK MANAGEMENT AND USE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate agreements or other instruments to manage interest rate risk exposures and not for speculative purposes.  The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure, as well as to hedge specific transactions.  The counterparties to these arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its subsidiaries may also have other financial relationships.  The Company is potentially exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by these counterparties.  However, because of the high credit ratings of the counterparties, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet these obligations as they come due.  The Company does not hedgehed ge credit or property value market risks.

 

The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements that qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges designed to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on its variable rate debt.  Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance sheetsheets at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in shareholders’ equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.  These deferred gains and losses are amortized into interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings.  However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately.  Ineffectiveness was immaterial for all periods presented.

 

The Company formally assesses, both at inception of the hedge and on an on-going basis, whether each derivative is highly-effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item.  If management determines that a derivative is highly-effective as a hedge, it accounts for the derivative using hedge accounting, pursuant to which gains or losses inherent in the derivative do not impact the Company’s results of operations.  If management determines that a derivative is not highly-effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a highly-effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively and will reflect in its statementstatements of operations realized and unrealized gains and losses in respect of the derivative.

 

AtF-22



Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2007,2010, the Company had an interest rate swap agreements for notional principal amounts aggregating $75 million. The swap agreementscap agreement that effectively fixlimited the 30-day LIBOR component of the interest rate on $50$150 million of credit facility borrowings at 4.7725%to 1.50% per annum and on $25 million of credit facility borrowings at 4.716% per annum, in each case until November 2009.  The interest rate cap agreement effectively limits the interest rate on $40 million of credit facility borrowings at 5.50% per annum until June 2008.

through January 2011.  The following table summarizes the termsincludes all other hedge activity during 2009 and fair values of the Company’s derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2007 (in2010 (dollars in thousands):.

 

F-24



Hedge

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

Hedge Type

 

Amount

 

Strike

 

Effective Date

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge Product

 

Hedge Type

 

Amount

 

Strike

 

Maturity

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cap

 

Cash flow

 

$

40,000

 

5.5000

%

6/23/2008

 

 

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

50,000

 

4.7725

%

11/20/2009

 

$

(1,038

)

 

Cash flow

 

$

50,000

 

4.7725

%

8/24/2007

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

25,000

 

4.7160

%

11/20/2009

 

$

(493

)

 

Cash flow

 

25,000

 

4.7160

%

9/4/2007

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

25,000

 

2.3400

%

3/28/2008

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

200,000

 

2.7625

%

5/28/2008

 

11/20/2009

 

 

13.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As stated in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” on January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the methods of fair value as described in authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, to value its financial assets and liabilities.  As defined in the guidance, fair value is based on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considering counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

There were no financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.

14.  SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

 

On May 9, 2007,June 2, 2010 the Company’s shareholders approved an equity-based employee compensation plan,amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, (thea share-based employee compensation plan originally approved by shareholders on May 8, 2007 (as amended and restated, the “2007 Plan”).  On October 19, 2004, the Company’s sole shareholder approved a share-based employee compensation plan, the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan” and collectively with the 2007 Plan, the “Plans”).  The purpose of the Plans areis to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, Trustees and key employees and other persons and to motivate such officers, trustees,Trustees, key employees and other persons to serve the Company and its affiliates to expend maximum effort to improve the business results and earnings of the Company, by providing to such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in the operations and future success of the Company.  To this end, the Plans provide for the grant of share options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, share units, unrestricted shares, dividend equivalent rights and cash awards.  Any of these awards may, but need not, be made as performance incentives to reward attainment of annual or long-term performance goals.  Share options granted under the Plans may be non-qualified share options or incentive share options.

 

The Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Trustees (the “Compensation Committee”), which is appointed by the Board of Trustees. The Compensation Committee interprets the Plans and, subject to its right to delegate authority to grant awards, determines the terms and provisions of option grants and share awards. A

The 2007 Plan uses a “Fungible Units” methodology for computing the maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.  The Fungible Units methodology assigns weighted values to different types of awards under the 2007 Plan without assigning specific numerical limits for different types of awards.  Upon shareholder approval of the

F-23



Table of Contents

amendment and restatement of the 2007 plan in June 2010, a “Fungible Pool Limit” was established consisting of 4,728,561 shares plus any common shares restored to availability upon expiration or forfeiture of then-currently outstanding options or restricted share awards (consisting of 372,135 shares).

The 2007 Plan provides that any common shares made the subject of awards in the form of options or share appreciation rights shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as one (1) unit.  Any common shares made the subject of awards under the 2007 Plan in the form of restricted shares or share units (each a “Full-Value Award”) shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1.66 units.  The Fungible Pool Limit and the computation of the number of common shares available for issuance are subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, including share splits, reverse share splits and recapitalizations.  The number of shares counted against the Fungible Pool Limit includes the full number of shares subject to the award, and is not reduced in the event shares are withheld to fund withholding tax obligations, or, in the case of options and share appreciation rights, where shares are applied to pay the exercise price.  If an option or other award granted under the 2007 Plan expires, is forfeited or otherwise terminates, the common shares subject to any portion of such option or other award that expires, is forfeited or that otherwise terminates, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance under the 2007 Plan.

In addition to the overall limit on the number of shares that may be subject to awards under the 2007 Plan, the 2007 Plan limits the number of shares that may be the subject of awards during the three-year period ending December 31, 2012.  Specifically, the average of the following three ratios (each expressed as a percentage) shall not exceed the greater of two percent (2%) or the mean of the Company’s GICS peer group for the three-year period beginning January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2012.  The three ratios would correspond to the three calendar years in the three-year period ending December 31, 2012, and each ratio would be computed as (i) the number of shares subject to awards granted in the applicable year divided by (ii) the sum of the number of common shares and units of the Company’s operating partnership (“OP Units”) exchangeable into common shares outstanding at the end of such year.  Solely for purposes of calculating the number of shares subject to awards under this limitation, shares underlying Full-Value Awards will be taken into account in the numerator of the foregoing ratios as 1.5 shares.

Subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, a participant may not receive awards (with shares subject to awards being counted, depending on the type of award, in the proportions ranging from 1.0 to 1.66), as described above in any one calendar year covering more than 1,000,000 shares.

With respect to the 2004 Plan, a total of 3,900,000 and 3,000,000 common shares are reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan and 2004 Plan, respectively.Plan. The maximum number of common shares underlying equity awards that may be granted to an individual participant under the 2004 Plan during any calendar year is 400,000 for options or share appreciation rights and 100,000 for restricted shares or restricted share units, and 500,000 for options or share appreciation rights and 100,000 for restricted shares or restricted share units under the 2007 Plan.units. The maximum number of common shares that can be awarded under the Plan to any person, other than pursuant to an option, share appreciation rights or time-vested restricted shares, is 250,000 per calendar year under the 2004 Plan.  In addition, under the 2007 Plan, the maximum number of performance awards that may be granted to an executive officer is 100,000 and the maximum amount of performance shares that can be settled in cash and that can be granted in any year is $1.5 million. To the extent that options expire unexercised or are terminated, surrendered or canceled, the options and share awards become available for future grants under the Plans,2004 Plan, unless the Plans have2004 Plan has been terminated.

Under the Plans, the Compensation Committee determines the vesting schedule of each share award and option. The exercise price for options is equivalent to the fair market value of the underlying common shares at the grant date. The Compensation Committee also determines the term of each option, which shall not exceed 10 years from the grant date.

Share Options

 

The fair values for options granted in 20062010, 2009, and 20072008 were estimated at the time the options were granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model applying the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Assumptions:

 

2006

 

2007

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

5.0

%

4.7

%

 

3.7

%

2.6

%

3.4

%

Expected dividend yield

 

6.3

%

5.9

%

 

5.4

%

5.5

%

6.9

%

Volatility(a)

 

20.3

%

21.2

%

 

57.60

%

46.49

%

27.3

%

Weighted average expected life of the options(b)

 

7.5 years

 

9.4 years

 

 

9.9 years

 

9.8 years

 

9.0 years

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted per share

 

$

2.10

 

$

2.40

 

Weighted average grate date fair value of options granted per share

 

$

2.60

 

$

1.02

 

$

1.09

 


(a)  Expected volatility is based upon the level of volatility historically experienced.

(b)  Expected life is based upon our expectations of stock option recipients’ expected exercise and termination patterns.

F-24



Table of Contents

 

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.options. In addition, option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective

F-25



assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Volatility for the 20062008, 2009, and 20072010 grants was based on the trading history of the Company’s shares.

 

In 2007, 20062010, 2009, and 2005,2008, the Company recognized compensation expense related to options issued to employees and executives of approximately $0.9$1.9 million, $0.4$1.8 million and $0.5$1.4 million, respectively, which was recorded in Generalgeneral and administrative expense.  Approximately 575,000 share options were issued during 2010 for which the fair value of the options at their respective grant dates was approximately $1.5 million, which vest over three and five years.  As of December 31, 2007,2010, the Company had approximately $2.9$2.0 million of unrecognized option compensation cost related to unvested stock optionsall grants that will be recorded over the next five years.

 

The table below summarizes the option activity under the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2007, 20062010, 2009 and 2005:2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Under Option

 

Exercise Price

 

Contractual Term

 

 

Under Option

 

Exercise Price

 

Contractual Term

 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 

938,500

 

$

16.00

 

9.83

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

1,916,771

 

$

18.95

 

8.74

 

Options granted

 

 

 

 

 

2,400,990

 

9.43

 

9.09

 

Options canceled

 

(39,500

)

16.00

 

 

 

(1,006,662

)

13.08

 

 

Options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2005

 

899,000

 

$

16.00

 

8.83

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 

3,311,099

 

$

13.84

 

8.42

 

Options granted

 

867,500

 

18.38

 

10.00

 

 

1,456,881

 

3.75

 

9.09

 

Options canceled

 

(301,333

)

16.00

 

 

 

(221,676

)

11.73

 

 

Options exercised

 

(186,667

)

16.00

 

8.36

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2006

 

1,278,500

 

$

17.62

 

8.92

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

 

4,546,304

 

$

10.71

 

7.95

 

Options granted

 

960,271

 

19.82

 

9.24

 

 

574,556

 

7.32

 

9.06

 

Options canceled

 

(322,000

)

16.21

 

 

 

(50,875

)

12.71

 

 

Options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

(56,225

)

3.46

 

8.11

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

1,916,771

 

$

18.95

 

8.74

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

7.18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2007

 

1,916,771

 

18.95

 

8.74

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2007

 

208,164

 

17.98

 

8.17

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2010

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

7.18

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2010

 

2,652,755

 

$

13.12

 

6.60

 

 

At December 31, 2007,2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, of options that vested or expected to vest and of options that were exercisable was $0.0approximately $9.3 million.  The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

F-25



Table of Contents

 

Restricted Shares

 

The Company applies the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares.  As such, each grant is recognized ratably over the related vesting period.  Approximately 124,000387,000 restricted shares were issued during 20072010 for which the fair value of the restricted shares at their respective grant dates was approximately $1.9 million.$2.8 million, which vest over three and five years.  During 2006,2009, approximately 74,000402,000 restricted shares were issued for which the fair value of the restricted shares at their respective grant dates was approximately $1.3$1.5 million.  As of December 31, 20072010 the Company had approximately $1.3$2.2 million of remaining unrecognized compensation costs related to 2007 restricted share issuancescompensation costs that will be recognized over the next fivefour years.

On December 22, 2005, 163,677 restricted share units were granted to certain executives.  The restricted share units were granted in the form of deferred share units, entitling the holders thereof to receive common shares at a future date. Holders of the deferred share units are not entitled to any of the rights of a shareholder with respect to the deferred share units unless and until the common shares relating to the deferred share unit award have been delivered to such holder. However, the holders of the deferred share units are entitled to receive dividend equivalent payments, upon the Company’s payment of a cash dividend on outstanding common shares.

The shares were equally divided between time-vesting shares and market-based shares with values of $20.62 and $13.82 per share, respectively.   The fair value of the restricted share units at grant date was approximately $3.0 million.  The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the fair value of the market-based shares. The time-vesting

F-26



shares vest ratably over a five-year period, one-fifth per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date. The market-based shares vest ratably over a five-year period, one-fifth per year on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date if the average annual total shareholder return for the Company equals or exceeds ten percent. Additionally, any market-based shares that do not vest on a previous anniversary will vest on a subsequent anniversary date if the average annual total shareholder return from grant date equals or exceeds ten percent. Certain restricted share units awarded to the former Chief Executive Officer vest upon his retirement from the Company and since he reached the retirement age set forth in his award agreement prior to December 31, 2005, Robert J. Amsdell’s 72,745 restricted shares, valued at approximately $1.5 million, were recognized as share compensation expense in 2005.  During 2006, certain unvested shares vested early related to the termination of several executives under the terms of their respective employment agreements.  Accordingly, the Company recognized the related compensation expense in 2006.  As of December 31, 2006 the Company had no remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to the December 22, 2005 restricted share units.

 

The fair value for restricted share unitsshares granted in 2005 and 2007 were2008 was estimated at the time the units were granted.  Awards that contain a market feature were valued using a Monte Carlo-pricing model applying the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Assumptions:

 

2005

 

2007

 

 

2008

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

4.69

%

4.50

%

 

2.1

%

Volatility of total annual return

 

19.0

%

19.0

%

 

28.5

%

Weighted average expected life of the units

 

5 years

 

3 years

 

 

3 years

 

Weighted average fair value of units granted

 

$

18.73

 

$

11.70

 

Weighted average grant date fair value of units granted

 

$

4.14

 

 

In May 2005,The Monte Carlo pricing model was not used to value the Company implemented the Deferred Trustees Plan, a component of the Plan, upon the approval of the Company’s Board of Trustees. Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Trustees Plan, each non-employee member of the Board of Trustees may elect to receive all of his annual cash retainers2010 and meeting fees payable for service on the Board of Trustees or any committee of the Board of Trustees in the form of either all common shares or all deferred share units.

Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Trustees Plan, under the equity incentive plan, certain Trustees elected to receive their Board of Trustee fees in 2005 and 2006 in the form of deferred share units. On December 31, 2006 an aggregate of 8,564 deferred share units were granted to those Trustees and were valued at $20.55 per share and on December 31, 2005 and aggregate of 3,876 deferred share units were granted and were valued at $21.05 per share.

During 2004, there were an aggregate of 20,3152009 restricted shares granted to our Trustees. The restricted sharesas no market conditions were granted on October 27, 2004 and were valued at a price of $16.00 per share. Thepresent in these awards, as the fair value of the restricted shares was recognized as compensation expense overshare grants were equal to the vesting or service period during 2004 and 2005.stock price on the date of grant.

 

In 2007, 20062010, 2009 and 2005,2008, the Company recognized compensation expense related to restricted shares and restricted share units issued to employees and Trustees of approximately $1.1$1.8 million, $0.7$1.6 million and $1.7$1.3 million, respectively; these amounts were recorded in Generalgeneral and administrative expense. Included in compensation expense for 2005 is approximately $1.5 million which represents the vested portion of the fair value of the restricted share units granted of 163,677 at a range of $13.82 to $20.62 per restricted share units to certain members of the Company’s management team.  The following table presents non-vested restricted share activity during 2007:2010:

 

 

 

Number of Non-

 

 

 

Vested Restricted

 

 

 

Shares

 

Non-Vested at January 1, 20072010

 

104,854572,320

 

Granted

 

124,121386,785

 

Vested

 

(18,820235,698

)

Forfeited

 

(32,08451,585

)

Non-Vested at December 31, 20072010

 

178,071671,822

 

 

F-27F-26



Table of Contents

 

14.15.  EARNINGS PER SHARE AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

The following is a summary of the elements used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(15,481

)

$

(8,742

)

$

979

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,404

 

191

 

589

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

shares

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

$

1,568

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(9,851

)

$

(19,302

)

$

(25,837

)

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

557

 

1,046

 

2,034

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

 

Loss from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

(176

)

(986

)

(2,344

)

Total discontinued operations attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

3,656

 

$

17,984

 

$

26,595

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,120

 

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

Share options and restricted share units (1)

 

 

 

83

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

42,203

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding (2)

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per Common Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.02

 

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

Discontinued operations

 

0.04

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.04

 

0.26

 

0.46

 

 

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.04

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

 


(1) For the years ended December 31, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008, the potentially dilutive shares of approximately 22,0001,177,000, 547,000, and 121,000,94,000 respectively, were not included in the earnings per share calculation as their effect is antidilutive.

 

(2) For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company declared cash dividends per share of $0.145, $0.10 and $0.565, respectively.

The operating partnershipOperating Partnership units and common shares have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and distributions of the operating partnership.Operating Partnership.  An operating partnershipOperating Partnership unit may be redeemed for cash, or at the Company’s option, common shares on a one-for-one basis.  Outstanding minoritynoncontrolling interest units in the operating partnershipOperating Partnership were 4,737,136, 4,809,636 and 5,079,928 as of December 31, 2007.2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  There were 57,577,23298,596,796 common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2007.2010.

Issuance of Common Shares

On August 19, 2009, the Company sold 32.2 million common shares of beneficial interest for net proceeds of approximately $161.9 million.  In April 2009, the Company commenced the sale of up to 10 million common shares pursuant to a continuous offering program, which was amended in January 2011 to include the sale of up to 15 million common shares.  Pursuant to the program, we may sell shares in amounts and at times to be determined by us.  Actual sales will be determined by a variety of factors to be determined by us, including market conditions, the trading price of our common shares and determinations by us of the appropriate sources of funding.  In connection with the offering program, the Company engaged a sales agent who receives compensation equal to up to three percent of the gross sales price per common share for any shares sold pursuant to the program.  During the year ended December 31, 2010 we sold 5.6 million shares under the program at an average sales price of $8.62 per share resulting in net proceeds of $47.6 million ($57.6 million of net proceeds and 8.1 million shares sold with an average sales price of $7.28 since program inception in 2009).  The Company used the net proceeds to fund the acquisition of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.

F-27



Table of Contents

 

15.16.  INCOME TAXES

 

Deferred income taxes are established for temporary differences between financial reporting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse.  A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if the Company believes that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  No valuation allowance was recorded at December 31, 20072010 or 2006.2009.  The Company had net deferred tax assets of $0.5$0.3 million and $0.3$0.5 million, which are included in other assets, as of December 31, 20072010 and 2006,2009, respectively.  The Company believes it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized.

 

F-28The following table discloses the income tax rates for the periods identified below:



 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

Income tax provision

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Federal

 

(0.1

)

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax provision

 

$

(0.1

)

$

(0.2

)

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

 

34.0

%

34.0

%

34

%

State and local income taxes

 

4.0

%

2.6

%

9

%

Effective income tax rate

 

38.0

%

36.6

%

43

%

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

 

34

%

34

%

34

%

State and local income taxes

 

4

%

4

%

4

%

Effective income tax rate

 

38

%

38

%

38

%

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share based compensation

 

$

0.7

 

$

0.6

 

$

0.8

 

$

0.8

 

$

1.6

 

$

1.6

 

Other

 

0.4

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.1

 

 

Deferred taxes

 

$

1.1

 

$

0.6

 

$

1.1

 

$

0.8

 

$

1.7

 

$

1.6

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share based compensation

 

$

2,971

 

$

2,689

 

$

2,177

 

$

1,933

 

$

1,325

 

$

1,185

 

Other

 

34

 

 

258

 

 

324

 

 

Deferred taxes

 

$

3,005

 

$

2,689

 

$

2,435

 

$

1,933

 

$

1,649

 

$

1,185

 

 

16.17.  PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

 

During 2006,2010, the Company completed an acquisition accounted for as a business combination of 85 management contracts from United Stor-All.  Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired 6012 self-storage facilities for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $362.4$85.1 million.  During 2007, the Company acquired 17 self-storage facilities for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $140.5 million and sold three properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $19.1 million.There were no acquisitions during 2009 (see note 4).

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information set forth below reflects adjustments to the Company’s historical financial data to give effect to each of the acquisitions dispositions and related financing activity (including the issuance of common shares) that occurred subsequent to January 1, 20062009 as if each had occurred onas of January 1, of each respective year.2009.  The unaudited pro forma information presented below does not purport to represent what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent the Company’s future results of operations.

 

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20072010 and 20062009 based on the assumptions described above:

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma revenue

 

$

235,642

 

$

229,186

 

Pro forma loss from continuing operations

 

$

(24,915

)

$

(27,054

)

Loss per common share from continuing operations

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted — as reported

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.15

)

Basic and diluted — as pro forma

 

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.47

)

F-29F-28



17.  ASSET IMPAIRMENT AND INSURANCE RECOVERIESTable of Contents

 

As a result of hurricanes that occurred during the third quarter of 2005, the Company incurred damage at certain of its self-storage facilities located in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment of or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”), the Company determined that there were indicators of impairment and accordingly tested the assets for recoverability. After an assessment of the damage sustained at the Waveland, Mississippi facility, the Company determined that a charge for impairment of approximately $2.3 million was required because the estimated undiscounted future cash flows did not support the carrying value of the assets. The Company expected that insurance proceeds from its comprehensive insurance for property damage would satisfy the entire loss incurred, and in 2005 appropriately recorded the impairment charge and an offsetting insurance recovery of $2.3 million, of which $0.5 million was received in October 2005. The related insurance receivable was included in other assets as of December 31, 2005, and the asset impairment charge and related insurance recovery were presented net in operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005.  During 2006, insurance proceeds were sufficient to cover the insurance receivable and there is no balance remaining as of December 31, 2006. During 2007 the Company recorded $0.4 million of impairment charges related to property damage incurred at six properties as a result of either a fire or flood.

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma revenue

 

$

224,586

 

$

222,953

 

Pro forma loss from continuing operations

 

(10,880

)

(21,296

)

Loss per common share from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted — as reported

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

Basic and diluted — as pro forma

 

(0.12

)

(0.28

)

 

18.  SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 20072010 and 20062009 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

2007

 

2007

 

2007

 

2007

 

 

2010

 

2010

 

2010

 

2010

 

Total revenues

 

$

54,907

 

$

56,077

 

$

58,073

 

$

60,110

 

 

$

51,564

 

$

53,163

 

$

55,487

 

$

56,612

 

Total operating expenses

 

$

45,597

 

$

44,594

 

$

48,621

 

$

51,860

 

 

44,165

 

46,529

 

45,683

 

45,670

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(3,358

)

$

295

 

$

(4,130

)

$

(5,884

)

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

(3,475

)

(4,521

)

(1,480

)

2,083

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.06

)

$

 

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.10

)

 

(0.04

)

(0.05

)

(0.02

)

0.02

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

2006

 

2006

 

2006

 

2006

 

 

2009

 

2009

 

2009

 

2009

 

Total revenues

 

$

47,613

 

$

52,776

 

$

55,798

 

$

54,462

 

 

$

53,263

 

$

52,625

 

$

53,082

 

$

51,762

 

Total operating expenses

 

$

38,741

 

$

40,729

 

$

45,645

 

$

47,041

 

 

45,906

 

47,135

 

45,467

 

44,566

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(1,625

)

$

724

 

$

(1,962

)

$

(5,688

)

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

(2,109

)

(2,844

)

6,818

 

(2,802

)

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.03

)

$

0.01

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.10

)

 

(0.03

)

(0.05

)

0.09

 

(0.03

)

The summation of quarterly earnings per share amounts do not necessarily equal the full year amounts.  The above information was updated to reclassify amounts to discontinued operations (see note 10).

 

19. LEASE ABANDONMENT CHARGECOMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

In August 2007, the Company abandoned certain office space in Cleveland, OH that was previously used for its corporate offices.  The related leases have expiration dates ranging from December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2014. Upon vacating the space, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement with a sub-tenant to lease the majority of the space for the duration of the term.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(6,019

)

$

(332

)

$

3,102

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments

 

 

6,153

 

(4,608

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translation

 

(268

)

553

 

(1,281

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(6,287

)

$

6,374

 

$

(2,787

)

 

As a result of this exit activity, the Company recognized a “Lease abandonment charge” of $1.3 million during 2007.  The charge is comprised of approximately $0.8 million of costs that represent the present value of the net cash flows associated with leases and the sub-lease agreement (“Contract Termination Costs”) and approximately $0.5 million of costs associated with the write-off of certain assets related to the abandoned space (“Other Associated Costs”).  The Contract Termination Costs of $0.8 million are presented as “Accounts payable and accrued rent” and the Other Associated Costs of $0.5 million were accounted for as a reduction of “Storage facilities.”  The Company will amortize the Contract Termination Costs against rental expense over the remaining life of the respective leases.

F-30F-29



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT


SCHEDULE III


REAL ESTATE AND RELATED DEPRECIATION


DECEMBER 31, 2007

2010
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs Sub-

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

sequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building
and
Improvements

 

Costs
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Mobile I, AL

 

65,198

 

 

 

$

149

 

$

1,429

 

$

636

 

$

225

 

$

1,989

 

$

2,214

 

$

636

 

1997

Mobile II, AL

 

129,260

 

(A)

 

226

 

2,524

 

1,165

 

301

 

3,583

 

3,883

 

1,238

 

1997

Mobile III, AL

 

43,125

 

 

 

167

 

1,849

 

320

 

237

 

2,100

 

2,336

 

591

 

1998

Mobile, AL

 

128,999

 

 

(A)

226

 

2,524

 

1,373

 

301

 

3,429

 

3,730

 

1,287

 

1997

 

Chandler, AZ

 

47,520

 

 

 

327

 

1,257

 

235

 

327

 

1,492

 

1,819

 

201

 

2005

 

47,520

 

 

 

327

 

1,257

 

268

 

327

 

1,325

 

1,652

 

267

 

2005

 

Glendale, AZ

 

56,830

 

 

 

201

 

2,265

 

864

 

418

 

2,911

 

3,330

 

735

 

1998

 

56,850

 

 

(O)

201

 

2,265

 

956

 

418

 

2,957

 

3,375

 

999

 

1998

 

Green Valley, AZ

 

25,200

 

(B)

 

298

 

1,153

 

89

 

298

 

1,242

 

1,540

 

167

 

2005

 

25,100

 

 

 

298

 

1,153

 

165

 

298

 

1,147

 

1,445

 

226

 

2005

 

Mesa I, AZ

 

52,375

 

 

 

920

 

2,739

 

103

 

921

 

2,841

 

3,762

 

324

 

2006

 

52,375

 

 

 

920

 

2,739

 

151

 

921

 

2,886

 

3,807

 

853

 

2006

 

Mesa II, AZ

 

45,295

 

 

 

731

 

2,176

 

127

 

731

 

2,303

 

3,034

 

265

 

2006

 

45,445

 

 

 

731

 

2,176

 

175

 

731

 

2,347

 

3,078

 

716

 

2006

 

Mesa III, AZ

 

58,264

 

 

 

706

 

2,101

 

128

 

706

 

2,210

 

2,935

 

256

 

2006

 

58,264

 

 

 

706

 

2,101

 

168

 

706

 

2,265

 

2,971

 

687

 

2006

 

Phoenix I, AZ

 

100,887

 

 

 

1,134

 

3,376

 

188

 

1,135

 

3,512

 

4,699

 

403

 

2006

 

100,762

 

 

(O)

1,134

 

3,376

 

324

 

1,135

 

3,696

 

4,831

 

1,099

 

2006

 

Phoenix II, AZ

 

45,270

 

 

 

756

 

2,251

 

128

 

756

 

2,379

 

3,136

 

273

 

2006

 

45,270

 

 

(O)

756

 

2,251

 

282

 

756

 

2,530

 

3,286

 

728

 

2006

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

80,925

 

 

 

443

 

4,879

 

1,558

 

883

 

5,998

 

6,880

 

1,504

 

1998

 

80,425

 

 

(O)

443

 

4,879

 

1,709

 

883

 

6,069

 

6,952

 

2,031

 

1998

 

Tempe, AZ

 

54,000

 

(A)

 

749

 

2,159

 

118

 

749

 

2,277

 

3,027

 

290

 

2005

 

53,890

 

 

(A)

749

 

2,159

 

204

 

749

 

2,095

 

2,844

 

379

 

2005

 

Tucson I, AZ

 

59,350

 

 

 

188

 

2,078

 

820

 

384

 

2,703

 

3,086

 

667

 

1998

 

59,350

 

 

(O)

188

 

2,078

 

936

 

384

 

2,789

 

3,173

 

930

 

1998

 

Tucson II, AZ

 

43,950

 

 

 

188

 

2,078

 

833

 

391

 

2,708

 

3,099

 

666

 

1998

 

43,950

 

2,919

 

188

 

2,078

 

924

 

391

 

2,767

 

3,158

 

914

 

1998

 

Tucson III, AZ

 

49,822

 

(C)

 

532

 

2,048

 

105

 

533

 

2,153

 

2,686

 

291

 

2005

 

49,822

 

 

(B)

532

 

2,048

 

160

 

533

 

1,909

 

2,442

 

347

 

2005

 

Tucson IV, AZ

 

47,840

 

(C)

 

674

 

2,595

 

144

 

675

 

2,739

 

3,413

 

369

 

2005

 

48,008

 

 

(B)

674

 

2,595

 

176

 

675

 

2,396

 

3,071

 

441

 

2005

 

Tucson V, AZ

 

45,160

 

(C)

 

515

 

1,980

 

160

 

515

 

2,140

 

2,655

 

286

 

2005

 

45,234

 

 

(B)

515

 

1,980

 

250

 

515

 

1,942

 

2,457

 

359

 

2005

 

Tucson VI, AZ

 

40,778

 

(C)

 

440

 

1,692

 

127

 

440

 

1,819

 

2,259

 

250

 

2005

 

40,766

 

 

(B)

440

 

1,692

 

170

 

440

 

1,615

 

2,055

 

316

 

2005

 

Tucson VII, AZ

 

52,738

 

(C)

 

670

 

2,576

 

197

 

670

 

2,772

 

3,442

 

365

 

2005

 

52,688

 

 

(B)

670

 

2,576

 

224

 

670

 

2,425

 

3,095

 

448

 

2005

 

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

46,800

 

(C)

 

589

 

2,265

 

90

 

589

 

2,354

 

2,943

 

317

 

2005

 

46,650

 

 

(B)

589

 

2,265

 

117

 

589

 

2,053

 

2,642

 

370

 

2005

 

Tucson IX, AZ

 

67,656

 

(C)

 

724

 

2,786

 

223

 

725

 

3,009

 

3,734

 

392

 

2005

 

67,648

 

 

(B)

724

 

2,786

 

296

 

725

 

2,680

 

3,405

 

488

 

2005

 

Tucson X, AZ

 

46,350

 

(C)

 

424

 

1,633

 

72

 

425

 

1,705

 

2,129

 

233

 

2005

 

46,350

 

 

(B)

424

 

1,633

 

217

 

425

 

1,609

 

2,034

 

302

 

2005

 

Tucson XI, AZ

 

42,800

 

(C)

 

439

 

1,689

 

131

 

439

 

1,820

 

2,259

 

243

 

2005

 

42,800

 

 

(B)

439

 

1,689

 

308

 

439

 

1,750

 

2,189

 

317

 

2005

 

Tucson XII, AZ

 

42,375

 

(C)

 

671

 

2,582

 

134

 

672

 

2,716

 

3,387

 

364

 

2005

 

42,325

 

 

(B)

671

 

2,582

 

189

 

672

 

2,397

 

3,069

 

432

 

2005

 

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

45,792

 

(C)

 

587

 

2,258

 

95

 

587

 

2,352

 

2,940

 

317

 

2005

 

45,792

 

 

(B)

587

 

2,258

 

162

 

587

 

2,092

 

2,679

 

382

 

2005

 

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

49,470

 

 

 

707

 

2,721

 

112

 

708

 

2,833

 

3,540

 

379

 

2005

 

49,095

 

 

(O)

707

 

2,721

 

227

 

708

 

2,553

 

3,261

 

468

 

2005

 

Apple Valley I, CA

 

73,340

 

(D)

 

140

 

1,570

 

1,500

 

476

 

2,733

 

3,210

 

645

 

1997

 

73,440

 

 

 

140

 

1,570

 

1,571

 

476

 

2,775

 

3,251

 

910

 

1997

 

Apple Valley II, CA

 

62,115

 

(E)

 

160

 

1,787

 

1,165

 

431

 

2,681

 

3,112

 

678

 

1997

 

61,555

 

 

(C)

160

 

1,787

 

1,196

 

431

 

2,681

 

3,112

 

914

 

1997

 

Benicia, CA

 

74,920

 

 

 

2,392

 

7,028

 

118

 

2,392

 

7,146

 

9,538

 

850

 

2005

 

74,770

 

 

(O)

2,392

 

7,028

 

173

 

2,392

 

6,205

 

8,597

 

1,092

 

2005

 

Bloomington I, CA

 

28,550

 

 

 

42

 

463

 

422

 

100

 

827

 

927

 

228

 

1997

Bloomington II, CA

 

25,860

 

 

 

54

 

604

 

414

 

144

 

928

 

1,072

 

236

 

1997

Cathedral City, CA

 

129,048

 

 

 

2,194

 

10,046

 

100

 

2,195

 

10,145

 

12,340

 

1,044

 

2006

 

109,340

 

 

(O)

2,194

 

10,046

 

223

 

2,195

 

9,283

 

11,478

 

2,658

 

2006

 

Citrus Heights, CA

 

75,620

 

(C)

 

1,633

 

4,793

 

89

 

1,634

 

4,882

 

6,516

 

671

 

2005

 

75,620

 

 

(B)

1,633

 

4,793

 

208

 

1,634

 

4,319

 

5,953

 

820

 

2005

 

Diamond Bar, CA

 

103,228

 

 

 

2,522

 

7,404

 

142

 

2,524

 

7,541

 

10,068

 

1,043

 

2005

 

103,034

 

 

(O)

2,522

 

7,404

 

240

 

2,524

 

6,594

 

9,118

 

1,235

 

2005

 

Escondido, CA

 

143,145

 

 

 

3,040

 

11,804

 

(781

)

3,040

 

10,238

 

14,063

 

198

 

2007

 

142,870

 

 

(M)

3,040

 

11,804

 

38

 

3,040

 

11,058

 

14,098

 

1,999

 

2007

 

Fallbrook, CA

 

46,370

 

(F)

 

133

 

1,492

 

1,455

 

432

 

2,648

 

3,080

 

609

 

1997

 

46,620

 

 

 

133

��

1,492

 

1,492

 

432

 

2,663

 

3,095

 

863

 

1997

 

Hemet, CA

 

66,040

 

(D)

 

125

 

1,396

 

1,262

 

417

 

2,367

 

2,783

 

567

 

1997

Highland I, CA

 

76,765

 

(D)

 

215

 

2,407

 

1,893

 

582

 

3,933

 

4,515

 

981

 

1997

Highland II, CA

 

62,257

 

 

 

1,277

 

5,847

 

134

 

1,277

 

5,981

 

7,258

 

611

 

2006

Lancaster, CA

 

61,275

 

(E)

 

390

 

2,247

 

890

 

556

 

2,971

 

3,527

 

726

 

2001

 

60,625

 

 

(C)

390

 

2,247

 

953

 

556

 

2,769

 

3,325

 

756

 

2001

 

Long Beach, CA

 

125,213

 

 

 

3,138

 

14,368

 

189

 

3,138

 

14,557

 

17,696

 

1,500

 

2006

 

125,163

 

 

(O)

3,138

 

14,368

 

480

 

3,138

 

14,844

 

17,982

 

3,892

 

2006

 

Murrieta, CA

 

49,895

 

 

 

1,883

 

5,532

 

151

 

1,903

 

5,663

 

7,566

 

678

 

2005

 

49,815

 

 

(M)

1,883

 

5,532

 

199

 

1,903

 

4,926

 

6,829

 

883

 

2005

 

North Highlands, CA

 

57,244

 

(C)

 

868

 

2,546

 

185

 

868

 

2,731

 

3,598

 

363

 

2005

 

57,244

 

 

(B)

868

 

2,546

 

262

 

868

 

2,442

 

3,310

 

473

 

2005

 

Orangevale, CA

 

50,492

 

(C)

 

1,423

 

4,175

 

117

 

1,423

 

4,291

 

5,714

 

587

 

2005

 

50,392

 

 

(B)

1,423

 

4,175

 

280

 

1,423

 

3,860

 

5,283

 

707

 

2005

 

Palm Springs I, CA

 

72,775

 

 

 

1,565

 

7,164

 

100

 

1,566

 

7,263

 

8,829

 

750

 

2006

 

72,675

 

 

(O)

1,565

 

7,164

 

130

 

1,566

 

7,290

 

8,856

 

1,940

 

2006

 

Palm Springs II, CA

 

122,745

 

 

 

2,131

 

9,758

 

152

 

2,132

 

9,909

 

12,041

 

1,020

 

2006

 

122,370

 

 

(O)

2,131

 

9,758

 

375

 

2,132

 

10,124

 

12,256

 

2,685

 

2006

 

Pleasanton, CA

 

82,415

 

 

 

2,799

 

8,222

 

42

 

2,799

 

8,264

 

11,063

 

984

 

2005

 

85,055

 

 

 

2,799

 

8,222

 

60

 

2,799

 

7,117

 

9,916

 

1,236

 

2005

 

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

53,928

 

(C)

 

1,094

 

3,212

 

162

 

1,095

 

3,374

 

4,469

 

457

 

2005

 

54,128

 

 

(B)

1,094

 

3,212

 

239

 

1,095

 

2,992

 

4,087

 

581

 

2005

 

Redlands, CA

 

62,805

 

(F)

 

196

 

2,192

 

1,123

 

449

 

3,063

 

3,511

 

853

 

1997

Rialto, CA

 

57,371

 

 

 

899

 

4,118

 

86

 

899

 

4,204

 

5,103

 

434

 

2006

Rialto I, CA

 

57,411

 

 

(M)

899

 

4,118

 

173

 

899

 

4,287

 

5,186

 

1,135

 

2006

 

Rialto II, CA

 

99,393

 

 

 

277

 

3,098

 

1,589

 

672

 

4,293

 

4,964

 

1,161

 

1997

 

99,783

 

 

 

277

 

3,098

 

1,745

 

672

 

4,390

 

5,062

 

1,556

 

1997

 

Riverside I, CA

 

27,485

 

 

 

42

 

465

 

474

 

141

 

841

 

981

 

222

 

1997

 

67,170

 

 

(M)

1,351

 

6,183

 

236

 

1,351

 

6,415

 

7,766

 

1,695

 

2006

 

Riverside II, CA

 

20,420

 

 

 

42

 

423

 

336

 

114

 

687

 

801

 

177

 

1997

 

85,196

 

 

(O)

1,170

 

5,359

 

346

 

1,170

 

5,701

 

6,871

 

1,510

 

2006

 

Riverside III, CA

 

46,809

 

 

 

91

 

1,035

 

964

 

310

 

1,780

 

2,090

 

402

 

1998

Riverside IV, CA

 

67,320

 

 

 

1,351

 

6,183

 

74

 

1,351

 

6,257

 

7,608

 

646

 

2006

Riverside V, CA

 

85,521

 

 

 

1,170

 

5,359

 

144

 

1,170

 

5,502

 

6,673

 

566

 

2006

Riverside VI, CA

 

74,900

 

(K)

 

1,040

 

4,119

 

(190

)

1,040

 

3,738

 

4,969

 

70

 

2007

Roseville, CA

 

59,944

 

(C)

 

1,284

 

3,767

 

180

 

1,284

 

3,947

 

5,231

 

528

 

2005

 

59,869

 

 

(B)

1,284

 

3,767

 

375

 

1,284

 

3,605

 

4,889

 

673

 

2005

 

Sacramento I, CA

 

50,764

 

(C)

 

1,152

 

3,380

 

136

 

1,152

 

3,514

 

4,668

 

480

 

2005

 

51,114

 

 

(B)

1,152

 

3,380

 

230

 

1,152

 

3,126

 

4,278

 

600

 

2005

 

Sacramento II, CA

 

61,890

 

(C)

 

1,406

 

4,128

 

77

 

1,407

 

4,205

 

5,612

 

579

 

2005

 

61,856

 

 

(B)

1,406

 

4,128

 

147

 

1,407

 

3,686

 

5,093

 

690

 

2005

 

San Bernardino I, CA

 

47,350

 

 

 

67

 

748

 

826

 

217

 

1,424

 

1,641

 

334

 

1997

 

31,070

 

 

(A)

51

 

572

 

1,145

 

182

 

1,480

 

1,662

 

436

 

1997

 

San Bernardino II, CA

 

83,278

 

(F)

 

152

 

1,704

 

1,298

 

450

 

2,703

 

3,154

 

688

 

1997

 

41,546

 

 

(A)

112

 

1,251

 

1,161

 

306

 

2,042

 

2,348

 

682

 

1997

 

San Bernardino III, CA

 

31,070

 

(A)

 

51

 

572

 

1,037

 

182

 

1,478

 

1,660

 

391

 

1997

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

57,245

 

(F)

 

152

 

1,695

 

1,604

 

444

 

3,007

 

3,451

 

881

 

1997

 

35,671

 

 

(A)

98

 

1,093

 

969

 

242

 

1,728

 

1,970

 

580

 

1997

 

San Bernardino V, CA

 

41,646

 

(A)

 

112

 

1,251

 

1,077

 

306

 

2,135

 

2,440

 

644

 

1997

 

83,507

 

 

(C)

1,872

 

5,391

 

55

 

1,872

 

4,783

 

6,655

 

891

 

2005

 

San Bernardino VI, CA

 

35,671

 

(A)

 

98

 

1,093

 

884

 

242

 

1,813

 

2,075

 

575

 

1997

 

57,145

 

 

(M)

783

 

3,583

 

447

 

783

 

4,026

 

4,809

 

1,037

 

2006

 

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

103,860

 

 

(M)

1,205

 

5,518

 

252

 

1,205

 

5,316

 

6,521

 

1,529

 

2006

 

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

78,729

 

 

(M)

1,475

 

6,753

 

322

 

1,476

 

7,070

 

8,546

 

1,867

 

2006

 

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

95,129

 

 

(O)

1,691

 

7,741

 

286

 

1,692

 

7,191

 

8,883

 

2,100

 

2006

 

San Bernardino X, CA

 

37,430

 

 

 

775

 

2,288

 

121

 

776

 

2,078

 

2,854

 

381

 

2005

 

Santa Ana, CA

 

63,571

 

 

(O)

1,223

 

5,600

 

233

 

1,223

 

5,829

 

7,052

 

1,534

 

2006

 

South Sacramento, CA

 

51,940

 

 

(B)

790

 

2,319

 

242

 

791

 

2,227

 

3,018

 

431

 

2005

 

Spring Valley, CA

 

55,045

 

 

(M)

1,178

 

5,394

 

517

 

1,178

 

5,907

 

7,085

 

1,502

 

2006

 

Temecula I, CA

 

81,700

 

 

 

660

 

4,735

 

1,142

 

899

 

5,255

 

6,154

 

1,437

 

1998

 

Temecula II, CA

 

84,398

 

 

(M)

3,080

 

5,839

 

147

 

3,080

 

5,876

 

8,956

 

1,066

 

2007

 

Thousand Palms, CA

 

75,445

 

 

(O)

1,493

 

6,835

 

383

 

1,493

 

7,214

 

8,707

 

1,939

 

2006

 

Vista I, CA

 

74,405

 

 

 

711

 

4,076

 

2,081

 

1,118

 

5,247

 

6,365

 

1,294

 

2001

 

Vista II, CA

 

147,281

 

 

(O)

4,629

 

13,599

 

198

 

4,629

 

11,877

 

16,506

 

2,056

 

2005

 

Walnut, CA

 

50,708

 

 

(O)

1,578

 

4,635

 

184

 

1,595

 

4,143

 

5,738

 

743

 

2005

 

 

F-31F-30



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs Sub-

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

sequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

83,507

 

(E)

 

$

1,872

 

$

5,391

 

$

34

 

$

1,872

 

$

5,426

 

$

7,297

 

$

835

 

2005

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

56,820

 

 

 

783

 

3,583

 

138

 

783

 

3,721

 

4,504

 

382

 

2006

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

117,928

 

 

 

1,205

 

5,518

 

119

 

1,205

 

5,636

 

6,841

 

581

 

2006

San Bernardino X, CA

 

78,839

 

 

 

1,475

 

6,753

 

185

 

1,476

 

6,937

 

8,413

 

711

 

2006

San Bernardino XI, CA

 

112,154

 

 

 

1,691

 

7,741

 

165

 

1,692

 

7,905

 

9,597

 

814

 

2006

San Marcos, CA

 

37,430

 

(G

 

775

 

2,288

 

48

 

776

 

2,335

 

3,111

 

322

 

2005

Santa Ana, CA

 

65,528

 

 

 

1,223

 

5,600

 

144

 

1,223

 

5,744

 

6,967

 

588

 

2006

South Palmetto, CA

 

80,505

 

 

 

292

 

3,289

 

1,818

 

688

 

4,711

 

5,399

 

1,076

 

1998

South Sacramento, CA

 

52,290

 

(C)

 

790

 

2,319

 

109

 

791

 

2,428

 

3,219

 

334

 

2005

Spring Valley, CA

 

55,070

 

 

 

1,178

 

5,394

 

285

 

1,178

 

5,679

 

6,857

 

577

 

2006

Sun City, CA

 

38,435

 

 

 

140

 

1,579

 

894

 

324

 

2,289

 

2,613

 

554

 

1998

Temecula I, CA

 

81,740

 

 

 

660

 

4,735

 

1,104

 

911

 

5,588

 

6,499

 

1,252

 

1998

Temecula II, CA

 

84,580

 

(K)

 

3,080

 

5,839

 

(103

)

3,080

 

5,626

 

8,815

 

104

 

2007

Thousand Palms, CA

 

76,336

 

 

 

1,493

 

6,835

 

263

 

1,493

 

7,098

 

8,591

 

728

 

2006

Vista I, CA

 

74,405

 

(D)

 

711

 

4,076

 

2,032

 

1,118

 

5,701

 

6,819

 

1,298

 

2001

Vista II, CA

 

147,721

 

 

 

4,629

 

13,599

 

54

 

4,629

 

13,653

 

18,282

 

1,624

 

2005

Walnut, CA

 

50,708

 

 

 

1,578

 

4,635

 

173

 

1,595

 

4,792

 

6,386

 

568

 

2005

West Sacramento, CA

 

39,715

 

 

 

1,222

 

3,590

 

81

 

1,222

 

3,671

 

4,893

 

433

 

2005

Westminster, CA

 

68,048

 

(G)

 

1,740

 

5,142

 

111

 

1,743

 

5,250

 

6,993

 

727

 

2005

Yucaipa, CA

 

77,560

 

(F)

 

198

 

2,221

 

1,454

 

525

 

3,348

 

3,873

 

860

 

1997

Aurora I, CO

 

75,867

 

(C)

 

1,343

 

2,986

 

181

 

1,343

 

3,167

 

4,510

 

446

 

2005

Aurora II, CO

 

57,753

 

 

 

736

 

1,637

 

254

 

736

 

1,891

 

2,627

 

244

 

2005

Aurora III, CO

 

28,730

 

 

 

352

 

783

 

159

 

352

 

942

 

1,294

 

122

 

2005

Aurora IV, CO

 

49,700

 

 

 

752

 

3,066

 

108

 

753

 

3,173

 

3,927

 

356

 

2006

Boulder I, CO

 

47,296

 

 

 

1,005

 

4,095

 

209

 

1,005

 

4,304

 

5,309

 

421

 

2006

Boulder II, CO

 

101,245

 

 

 

2,556

 

10,416

 

180

 

2,556

 

10,596

 

13,152

 

1,029

 

2006

Boulder III, CO

 

80,174

 

 

 

1,370

 

5,581

 

149

 

1,370

 

5,730

 

7,100

 

558

 

2006

Boulder IV, CO

 

95,148

 

 

 

2,102

 

8,563

 

135

 

2,102

 

8,699

 

10,800

 

845

 

2006

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

47,975

 

 

 

771

 

1,717

 

160

 

771

 

1,877

 

2,648

 

242

 

2005

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

62,400

 

1,999

 

657

 

2,674

 

162

 

656

 

2,837

 

3,493

 

233

 

2006

Denver I, CO

 

58,050

 

 

 

1,105

 

2,459

 

109

 

1,105

 

2,568

 

3,673

 

334

 

2005

Denver II, CO

 

59,200

 

 

 

673

 

2,741

 

104

 

674

 

2,845

 

3,518

 

322

 

2006

Denver III, CO

 

63,700

 

 

 

732

 

2,982

 

127

 

733

 

3,108

 

3,841

 

352

 

2006

Englewood, CO

 

51,000

 

 

 

981

 

2,183

 

115

 

981

 

2,298

 

3,278

 

305

 

2005

Federal Heights, CO

 

54,770

 

(C)

 

878

 

1,953

 

80

 

879

 

2,032

 

2,911

 

291

 

2005

Golden, CO

 

87,832

 

(C)

 

1,683

 

3,744

 

205

 

1,684

 

3,948

 

5,632

 

551

 

2005

Littleton I , CO

 

53,490

 

(C)

 

1,268

 

2,820

 

118

 

1,268

 

2,938

 

4,206

 

411

 

2005

Littleton II, CO

 

46,175

 

 

 

1,121

 

2,495

 

127

 

1,121

 

2,622

 

3,743

 

346

 

2005

Northglenn, CO

 

52,102

 

(C)

 

862

 

1,917

 

103

 

862

 

2,020

 

2,882

 

288

 

2005

Bloomfield, CT

 

48,700

 

 

 

78

 

880

 

2,193

 

360

 

2,791

 

3,151

 

675

 

1997

Branford, CT

 

49,079

 

 

 

217

 

2,433

 

1,021

 

504

 

3,166

 

3,671

 

1,043

 

1995

Bristol, CT

 

47,825

 

(E)

 

1,819

 

3,161

 

53

 

1,819

 

3,213

 

5,033

 

529

 

2005

East Windsor, CT

 

45,900

 

(A)

 

744

 

1,294

 

239

 

744

 

1,519

 

2,278

 

236

 

2005

Enfield, CT

 

52,775

 

(D)

 

424

 

2,424

 

282

 

473

 

2,657

 

3,130

 

923

 

2001

Gales Ferry, CT

 

54,230

 

 

 

240

 

2,697

 

1,312

 

489

 

3,760

 

4,249

 

1,247

 

1995

Manchester I, CT

 

47,125

 

(D)

 

540

 

3,096

 

292

 

563

 

3,365

 

3,928

 

1,120

 

2002

Manchester II, CT

 

52,725

 

(E)

 

996

 

1,730

 

83

 

996

 

1,811

 

2,809

 

293

 

2005

Milford, CT

 

44,885

 

 

 

87

 

1,050

 

1,049

 

274

 

1,912

 

2,186

 

529

 

1994

Monroe, CT

 

58,500

 

(E)

 

2,004

 

3,483

 

439

 

2,004

 

3,837

 

5,926

 

605

 

2005

Mystic, CT

 

50,800

 

 

 

136

 

1,645

 

1,692

 

410

 

3,030

 

3,473

 

854

 

1994

Newington I, CT

 

42,620

 

(E)

 

1,059

 

1,840

 

64

 

1,059

 

1,904

 

2,962

 

312

 

2005

Newington II, CT

 

35,810

 

(E)

 

911

 

1,584

 

60

 

911

 

1,644

 

2,555

 

272

 

2005

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

87,700

 

(E)

 

3,092

 

5,374

 

218

 

3,092

 

5,592

 

8,684

 

918

 

2005

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

26,425

 

(E)

 

1,135

 

1,973

 

110

 

1,135

 

2,083

 

3,218

 

343

 

2005

South Windsor, CT

 

71,725

 

 

 

90

 

1,127

 

1,041

 

272

 

1,985

 

2,258

 

538

 

1994

Stamford, CT

 

28,957

 

(E)

 

1,941

 

3,374

 

52

 

1,941

 

3,426

 

5,367

 

565

 

2005

Boca Raton, FL

 

37,958

 

(F)

 

529

 

3,054

 

1,456

 

813

 

4,226

 

5,039

 

1,196

 

2001

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

62,013

 

(E)

 

667

 

3,796

 

1,581

 

958

 

5,086

 

6,044

 

1,478

 

2001

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

61,841

 

(A)

 

1,030

 

2,968

 

192

 

1,030

 

3,160

 

4,190

 

440

 

2005

Bradenton I, FL

 

68,502

 

 

 

1,180

 

3,324

 

115

 

1,180

 

3,439

 

4,619

 

558

 

2004

Bradenton II, FL

 

87,760

 

 

 

1,931

 

5,561

 

239

 

1,931

 

5,801

 

7,731

 

938

 

2004

Cape Coral, FL

 

76,592

 

(F)

 

472

 

2,769

 

2,261

 

830

 

4,672

 

5,502

 

1,341

 

2000

Dania Beach, FL

 

183,393

 

 

 

3,584

 

10,324

 

369

 

3,584

 

10,685

 

14,277

 

1,747

 

2004

Dania, FL

 

58,270

 

 

 

205

 

2,068

 

1,302

 

481

 

3,094

 

3,575

 

872

 

1994

Davie, FL

 

81,035

 

(D)

 

1,268

 

7,183

 

603

 

1,373

 

7,682

 

9,054

 

2,452

 

2001

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

57,600

 

(A)

 

946

 

2,999

 

1,799

 

1,311

 

4,433

 

5,744

 

902

 

1998

DeLand, FL

 

37,552

 

 

 

113

 

1,258

 

734

 

286

 

1,819

 

2,105

 

427

 

1998

Delray Beach, FL

 

67,809

 

(A)

 

798

 

4,539

 

562

 

883

 

5,017

 

5,899

 

1,644

 

2001

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

111,030

 

 

 

189

 

2,111

 

3,346

 

523

 

3,871

 

5,646

 

1,314

 

1996

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

70,596

 

(D)

 

937

 

3,646

 

2,202

 

1,384

 

5,401

 

6,785

 

1,134

 

1999

Ft. Myers, FL

 

67,546

 

(A)

 

303

 

3,329

 

334

 

328

 

3,637

 

3,966

 

1,213

 

1998

Gulf Breeze, FL

 

79,449

 

 

 

2,035

 

5,863

 

76

 

2,035

 

5,940

 

7,975

 

686

 

2005

Jacksonville I, FL

 

80,401

 

 

 

1,862

 

5,362

 

31

 

1,862

 

5,392

 

7,255

 

602

 

2005

Jacksonville II, FL

 

65,020

 

 

 

950

 

7,004

 

(666

)

950

 

5,671

 

7,288

 

114

 

2007

Jacksonville III, FL

 

65,603

 

 

 

860

 

7,409

 

(571

)

860

 

6,267

 

7,699

 

123

 

2007

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

78,604

 

(K)

 

870

 

8,049

 

(40

)

870

 

7,965

 

8,878

 

145

 

2007

Jacksonville V, FL

 

81,860

 

 

 

1,220

 

8,210

 

(533

)

1,220

 

7,141

 

8,897

 

138

 

2007

Lake Worth, FL

 

163,683

 

(F)

 

183

 

6,597

 

5,149

 

183

 

11,746

 

11,929

 

3,926

 

1998

Lakeland I, FL

 

48,911

 

(A)

 

81

 

896

 

940

 

256

 

1,661

 

1,917

 

606

 

1994

Lakeland II, FL

 

47,680

 

 

 

49

 

551

 

487

 

103

 

983

 

1,087

 

307

 

1996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

at December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

West Sacramento, CA

 

39,715

 

 

(I)

1,222

 

3,590

 

163

 

1,222

 

3,241

 

4,463

 

563

 

2005

 

Westminster, CA

 

68,148

 

 

 

1,740

 

5,142

 

241

 

1,743

 

4,649

 

6,392

 

878

 

2005

 

Aurora, CO

 

75,827

 

 

(B)

1,343

 

2,986

 

249

 

1,343

 

2,742

 

4,085

 

497

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

47,975

 

 

(O)

771

 

1,717

 

297

 

771

 

1,728

 

2,499

 

310

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

62,400

 

1,877

 

657

 

2,674

 

199

 

656

 

2,870

 

3,526

 

763

 

2006

 

Denver, CO

 

59,200

 

 

(O)

673

 

2,741

 

167

 

674

 

2,903

 

3,577

 

849

 

2006

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

54,770

 

 

(B)

878

 

1,953

 

190

 

879

 

1,819

 

2,698

 

325

 

2005

 

Golden, CO

 

86,580

 

 

(B)

1,683

 

3,744

 

333

 

1,684

 

3,462

 

5,146

 

600

 

2005

 

Littleton I , CO

 

53,490

 

 

(B)

1,268

 

2,820

 

162

 

1,268

 

2,516

 

3,784

 

434

 

2005

 

Northglenn, CO

 

52,102

 

 

(B)

862

 

1,917

 

180

 

862

 

1,777

 

2,639

 

324

 

2005

 

Bloomfield, CT

 

48,700

 

 

(O)

78

 

880

 

2,208

 

360

 

2,780

 

3,140

 

903

 

1997

 

Branford, CT

 

50,679

 

 

 

217

 

2,433

 

1,203

 

504

 

2,924

 

3,428

 

930

 

1995

 

Bristol, CT

 

47,950

 

 

(C)

1,819

 

3,161

 

93

 

1,819

 

2,800

 

4,619

 

581

 

2005

 

East Windsor, CT

 

45,800

 

 

(A)

744

 

1,294

 

347

 

744

 

1,433

 

2,177

 

301

 

2005

 

Enfield, CT

 

52,875

 

 

 

424

 

2,424

 

369

 

473

 

2,232

 

2,705

 

620

 

2001

 

Gales Ferry, CT

 

54,230

 

 

(O)

240

 

2,697

 

1,409

 

489

 

3,492

 

3,981

 

1,200

 

1995

 

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

47,125

 

 

 

540

 

3,096

 

365

 

563

 

2,759

 

3,322

 

732

 

2002

 

Manchester II, CT

 

52,725

 

 

(C)

996

 

1,730

 

173

 

996

 

1,652

 

2,648

 

337

 

2005

 

Milford, CT

 

44,885

 

 

(O)

87

 

1,050

 

1,073

 

274

 

1,918

 

2,192

 

727

 

1994

 

Monroe, CT

 

58,500

 

 

(C)

2,004

 

3,483

 

573

 

2,004

 

3,545

 

5,549

 

777

 

2005

 

Mystic, CT

 

50,725

 

 

(O)

136

 

1,645

 

1,794

 

410

 

3,148

 

3,558

 

1,191

 

1994

 

Newington I, CT

 

42,520

 

 

(C)

1,059

 

1,840

 

150

 

1,059

 

1,724

 

2,783

 

348

 

2005

 

Newington II, CT

 

36,140

 

 

(C)

911

 

1,584

 

176

 

911

 

1,529

 

2,440

 

319

 

2005

 

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

86,950

 

 

(C)

3,092

 

5,374

 

368

 

3,092

 

4,977

 

8,069

 

1,040

 

2005

 

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

26,425

 

 

(C)

1,135

 

1,973

 

212

 

1,135

 

1,900

 

3,035

 

398

 

2005

 

South Windsor, CT

 

72,125

 

 

 

90

 

1,127

 

1,118

 

272

 

2,043

 

2,315

 

748

 

1994

 

Stamford, CT

 

28,957

 

 

(C)

1,941

 

3,374

 

78

 

1,941

 

2,961

 

4,902

 

610

 

2005

 

Washington, DC

 

63,085

 

 

(I)

871

 

12,759

 

306

 

894

 

12,020

 

12,914

 

1,910

 

2008

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

37,958

 

 

 

529

 

3,054

 

1,482

 

813

 

3,655

 

4,468

 

935

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

61,977

 

 

(C)

667

 

3,796

 

1,646

 

958

 

4,403

 

5,361

 

1,152

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

61,727

 

 

(A)

1,030

 

2,968

 

231

 

1,030

 

2,821

 

3,851

 

528

 

2005

 

Bradenton I, FL

 

68,391

 

 

(O)

1,180

 

3,324

 

175

 

1,180

 

3,079

 

4,259

 

604

 

2004

 

Bradenton II, FL

 

87,815

 

 

(O)

1,931

 

5,561

 

364

 

1,931

 

5,227

 

7,158

 

1,024

 

2004

 

Cape Coral, FL

 

76,567

 

 

 

472

 

2,769

 

2,447

 

830

 

4,415

 

5,245

 

1,394

 

2000

 

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

181,463

 

 

(O)

3,584

 

10,324

 

985

 

3,584

 

9,978

 

13,562

 

1,883

 

2004

 

Dania, FL

 

58,270

 

 

(O)

205

 

2,068

 

1,389

 

481

 

3,149

 

3,630

 

1,189

 

1994

 

Davie, FL

 

81,135

 

 

 

1,268

 

7,183

 

745

 

1,373

 

6,035

 

7,408

 

1,292

 

2001

 

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

57,280

 

 

(A)

946

 

2,999

 

1,964

 

1,311

 

4,542

 

5,853

 

1,254

 

1998

 

Delray Beach, FL

 

67,821

 

 

(A)

798

 

4,539

 

635

 

883

 

4,215

 

5,098

 

1,167

 

2001

 

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

110,785

 

 

(O)

189

 

2,111

 

4,894

 

523

 

6,658

 

7,181

 

1,946

 

1996

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

70,093

 

 

 

937

 

3,646

 

2,361

 

1,384

 

5,443

 

6,827

 

1,497

 

1999

 

Ft. Myers, FL

 

67,558

 

 

(A)

303

 

3,329

 

605

 

328

 

3,463

 

3,791

 

1,129

 

1998

 

Jacksonville I, FL

 

80,376

 

 

(O)

1,862

 

5,362

 

43

 

1,862

 

4,739

 

6,601

 

757

 

2005

 

Jacksonville II, FL

 

65,070

 

 

 

950

 

7,004

 

34

 

950

 

6,371

 

7,321

 

1,157

 

2007

 

Jacksonville III, FL

 

65,575

 

 

(O)

860

 

7,409

 

834

 

1,670

 

6,861

 

8,531

 

1,242

 

2007

 

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

77,515

 

 

(O)

870

 

8,049

 

49

 

870

 

8,054

 

8,924

 

1,462

 

2007

 

Jacksonville V, FL

 

82,165

 

 

(O)

1,220

 

8,210

 

89

 

1,220

 

7,763

 

8,983

 

1,403

 

2007

 

Lake Worth, FL

 

161,808

 

 

 

183

 

6,597

 

6,755

 

183

 

11,728

 

11,911

 

3,696

 

1998

 

Lakeland, FL

 

49,095

 

 

(A)

81

 

896

 

992

 

256

 

1,384

 

1,640

 

449

 

1994

 

Kendall, FL

 

75,395

 

 

(I)

2,350

 

8,106

 

65

 

2,350

 

7,403

 

9,753

 

1,338

 

2007

 

Lutz I, FL

 

66,895

 

 

(O)

901

 

2,478

 

146

 

901

 

2,303

 

3,204

 

447

 

2004

 

Lutz II, FL

 

69,232

 

 

 

992

 

2,868

 

226

 

992

 

2,725

 

3,717

 

554

 

2004

 

Margate I, FL

 

54,505

 

 

(A)

161

 

1,763

 

1,804

 

399

 

3,278

 

3,677

 

1,192

 

1994

 

Margate II, FL

 

65,186

 

 

(O)

132

 

1,473

 

1,732

 

383

 

2,918

 

3,301

 

1,008

 

1996

 

Merrit Island, FL

 

50,417

 

 

(A)

716

 

2,983

 

492

 

796

 

2,815

 

3,611

 

653

 

2000

 

Miami I, FL

 

46,825

 

 

 

179

 

1,999

 

1,730

 

484

 

3,150

 

3,634

 

1,056

 

1995

 

Miami II, FL

 

67,060

 

 

(C)

253

 

2,544

 

1,417

 

561

 

3,626

 

4,187

 

1,410

 

1994

 

Miami IV, FL

 

150,590

 

 

(O)

4,577

 

13,185

 

469

 

4,577

 

12,038

 

16,615

 

1,991

 

2005

 

Naples I, FL

 

48,150

 

1,095

 

90

 

1,010

 

2,422

 

270

 

3,105

 

3,375

 

988

 

1996

 

Naples II, FL

 

65,850

 

 

(C)

148

 

1,652

 

4,231

 

558

 

5,446

 

6,004

 

1,763

 

1997

 

Naples III, FL

 

80,627

 

 

(A)

139

 

1,561

 

3,947

 

598

 

4,563

 

5,161

 

1,607

 

1997

 

Naples IV, FL

 

40,475

 

 

(O)

262

 

2,980

 

532

 

407

 

3,332

 

3,739

 

1,212

 

1998

 

Ocoee, FL

 

76,130

 

3,184

 

1,286

 

3,705

 

107

 

1,286

 

3,344

 

4,630

 

601

 

2005

 

Orange City, FL

 

59,586

 

 

(O)

1,191

 

3,209

 

95

 

1,191

 

2,896

 

4,087

 

556

 

2004

 

Orlando I, FL (6)

 

52,170

 

 

(O)

187

 

2,088

 

558

 

240

 

2,554

 

2,794

 

1,140

 

1997

 

Orlando II, FL

 

63,084

 

 

(C)

1,589

 

4,576

 

87

 

1,589

 

4,099

 

5,688

 

737

 

2005

 

Orlando III, FL

 

104,140

 

 

(O)

1,209

 

7,768

 

257

 

1,209

 

8,021

 

9,230

 

2,056

 

2006

 

Orlando IV, FL

 

76,615

 

 

 

633

 

3,587

 

32

 

633

 

3,619

 

4,252

 

17

 

2010

 

Oviedo, FL

 

49,251

 

 

(O)

440

 

2,824

 

407

 

440

 

3,227

 

3,667

 

841

 

2006

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

67,321

 

 

 

337

 

3,772

 

2,658

 

953

 

5,774

 

6,727

 

1,945

 

1997

 

Royal Palm Beach I, FL

 

98,961

 

 

 

205

 

2,148

 

2,692

 

741

 

4,238

 

4,979

 

1,702

 

1994

 

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

81,415

 

 

(O)

1,640

 

8,607

 

69

 

1,640

 

8,163

 

9,803

 

1,473

 

2007

 

 

F-31



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Costs
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Sanford, FL

 

61,810

 

 

(O)

453

 

2,911

 

129

 

453

 

3,036

 

3,489

 

798

 

2006

 

Sarasota, FL

 

71,102

 

 

(A)

333

 

3,656

 

1,203

 

529

 

4,166

 

4,695

 

1,319

 

1998

 

St. Augustine, FL

 

59,725

 

 

(O)

135

 

1,515

 

3,224

 

383

 

4,462

 

4,845

 

1,512

 

1996

 

Stuart, FL

 

86,883

 

 

(C)

324

 

3,625

 

2,762

 

685

 

5,974

 

6,659

 

1,997

 

1997

 

SW Ranches, FL

 

64,955

 

3,931

 

1,390

 

7,598

 

41

 

1,390

 

6,748

 

8,138

 

1,222

 

2007

 

Tampa, FL

 

83,738

 

 

 

2,670

 

6,249

 

102

 

2,670

 

5,816

 

8,486

 

1,071

 

2007

 

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

68,063

 

 

(O)

719

 

3,420

 

1,535

 

835

 

4,038

 

4,873

 

1,097

 

2001

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

94,503

 

 

 

2,129

 

8,671

 

254

 

2,129

 

7,435

 

9,564

 

1,459

 

2004

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

90,485

 

 

 

806

 

4,720

 

927

 

967

 

4,132

 

5,099

 

1,005

 

2001

 

Austell , GA

 

83,625

 

2,210

 

1,635

 

4,711

 

161

 

1,643

 

4,860

 

6,503

 

1,123

 

2006

 

Decatur, GA

 

148,480

 

 

(O)

616

 

6,776

 

157

 

616

 

6,856

 

7,472

 

2,545

 

1998

 

Norcross, GA

 

85,410

 

 

 

514

 

2,930

 

749

 

632

 

2,992

 

3,624

 

742

 

2001

 

Peachtree City, GA

 

49,875

 

 

(O)

435

 

2,532

 

543

 

529

 

2,489

 

3,018

 

631

 

2001

 

Smyrna, GA

 

56,820

 

 

 

750

 

4,271

 

169

 

750

 

3,494

 

4,244

 

863

 

2001

 

Snellville, GA

 

80,000

 

 

(O)

1,660

 

4,781

 

152

 

1,660

 

4,929

 

6,589

 

1,032

 

2007

 

Suwanee I, GA

 

85,240

 

 

(O)

1,737

 

5,010

 

145

 

1,737

 

5,151

 

6,888

 

1,077

 

2007

 

Suwanee II, GA

 

79,640

 

 

(O)

800

 

6,942

 

 

622

 

6,626

 

7,248

 

1,199

 

2007

 

Addison, IL

 

31,325

 

 

(O)

428

 

3,531

 

226

 

428

 

3,315

 

3,743

 

636

 

2004

 

Aurora, IL

 

74,435

 

 

(O)

644

 

3,652

 

114

 

644

 

3,311

 

3,955

 

635

 

2004

 

Bartlett, IL

 

51,425

 

 

(O)

931

 

2,493

 

164

 

931

 

2,340

 

3,271

 

446

 

2004

 

Hanover, IL

 

41,178

 

 

(C)

1,126

 

2,197

 

163

 

1,126

 

2,078

 

3,204

 

400

 

2004

 

Bellwood, IL

 

86,650

 

 

(C)

1,012

 

5,768

 

644

 

1,012

 

5,189

 

6,201

 

1,352

 

2001

 

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

74,400

 

3,430

 

1,564

 

4,327

 

281

 

1,564

 

4,058

 

5,622

 

781

 

2004

 

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

64,129

 

 

(O)

1,446

 

3,535

 

230

 

1,446

 

3,297

 

4,743

 

651

 

2004

 

Glenview, IL

 

100,115

 

 

(O)

3,740

 

10,367

 

169

 

3,740

 

9,255

 

12,995

 

1,780

 

2004

 

Gurnee, IL

 

80,300

 

 

(O)

1,521

 

5,440

 

244

 

1,521

 

5,007

 

6,528

 

986

 

2004

 

Harvey, IL

 

60,090

 

 

(O)

869

 

3,635

 

169

 

869

 

3,342

 

4,211

 

630

 

2004

 

Joliet, IL

 

73,175

 

 

(O)

547

 

4,704

 

182

 

547

 

4,292

 

4,839

 

814

 

2004

 

Kildeer, IL

 

46,275

 

 

 

2,102

 

2,187

 

15

 

1,997

 

2,027

 

4,024

 

386

 

2004

 

Lombard, IL

 

58,188

 

 

(O)

1,305

 

3,938

 

612

 

1,305

 

4,065

 

5,370

 

816

 

2004

 

Mount Prospect, IL

 

65,000

 

 

 

1,701

 

3,114

 

249

 

1,701

 

2,976

 

4,677

 

561

 

2004

 

Mundelein, IL

 

44,700

 

 

(O)

1,498

 

2,782

 

142

 

1,498

 

2,568

 

4,066

 

500

 

2004

 

North Chicago, IL

 

53,350

 

 

(O)

1,073

 

3,006

 

246

 

1,073

 

2,872

 

3,945

 

565

 

2004

 

Plainfield I, IL

 

53,800

 

 

(O)

1,770

 

1,715

 

222

 

1,770

 

1,698

 

3,468

 

333

 

2004

 

Plainfield II, IL

 

51,900

 

 

(O)

694

 

2,000

 

123

 

694

 

1,840

 

2,534

 

339

 

2005

 

Schaumburg, IL

 

31,160

 

 

(O)

538

 

645

 

135

 

538

 

671

 

1,209

 

134

 

2004

 

Streamwood, IL

 

64,305

 

 

(A)

1,447

 

1,662

 

240

 

1,447

 

1,665

 

3,112

 

333

 

2004

 

Warrensville, IL

 

48,796

 

 

(A)

1,066

 

3,072

 

152

 

1,066

 

2,829

 

3,895

 

507

 

2005

 

Waukegan, IL

 

79,500

 

 

(O)

1,198

 

4,363

 

250

 

1,198

 

4,054

 

5,252

 

777

 

2004

 

West Chicago, IL

 

48,175

 

 

(C)

1,071

 

2,249

 

196

 

1,071

 

2,159

 

3,230

 

418

 

2004

 

Westmont, IL

 

53,700

 

 

(O)

1,155

 

3,873

 

94

 

1,155

 

3,477

 

4,632

 

666

 

2004

 

Wheeling I, IL

 

54,210

 

 

(A)

857

 

3,213

 

242

 

857

 

3,043

 

3,900

 

590

 

2004

 

Wheeling II, IL

 

67,825

 

 

 

793

 

3,816

 

359

 

793

 

3,698

 

4,491

 

700

 

2004

 

Woodridge, IL

 

50,262

 

2,322

 

943

 

3,397

 

184

 

943

 

3,149

 

4,092

 

604

 

2004

 

Indianapolis I, IN

 

43,600

 

 

(O)

1,871

 

1,230

 

5

 

1,726

 

1,206

 

2,932

 

242

 

2004

 

Indianapolis II, IN

 

44,900

 

 

(O)

669

 

2,434

 

137

 

669

 

2,228

 

2,897

 

428

 

2004

 

Indianapolis III, IN

 

60,850

 

 

(O)

1,229

 

2,834

 

125

 

1,229

 

2,606

 

3,835

 

505

 

2004

 

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

62,105

 

 

(O)

641

 

3,154

 

29

 

552

 

2,864

 

3,416

 

558

 

2004

 

Indianapolis V, IN

 

74,825

 

 

(O)

2,138

 

3,633

 

175

 

2,138

 

3,351

 

5,489

 

652

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

73,003

 

 

(A)

406

 

3,496

 

211

 

406

 

3,260

 

3,666

 

626

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

91,777

 

 

(O)

908

 

4,755

 

500

 

908

 

4,653

 

5,561

 

907

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

79,998

 

 

(O)

887

 

3,548

 

215

 

887

 

3,306

 

4,193

 

633

 

2004

 

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

61,732

 

 

(O)

1,133

 

4,103

 

168

 

1,133

 

3,748

 

4,881

 

722

 

2004

 

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

35,200

 

 

(O)

112

 

1,248

 

538

 

139

 

1,569

 

1,708

 

466

 

1997

 

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

80,277

 

 

(A)

118

 

1,181

 

1,827

 

331

 

2,606

 

2,937

 

927

 

1997

 

Slidell, LA

 

79,540

 

 

 

188

 

3,175

 

1,639

 

795

 

3,591

 

4,386

 

860

 

2001

 

Boston I, MA

 

33,993

 

 

 

538

 

3,048

 

34

 

538

 

3,083

 

3,621

 

31

 

2010

 

Boston II, MA

 

60,695

 

 

 

1,516

 

8,628

 

312

 

1,516

 

7,144

 

8,660

 

1,754

 

2002

 

Leominster, MA

 

53,823

 

 

 

90

 

1,519

 

2,416

 

338

 

3,539

 

3,877

 

1,092

 

1998

 

Medford, MA

 

58,815

 

3,176

 

1,330

 

7,165

 

66

 

1,330

 

6,664

 

7,994

 

1,205

 

2007

 

Baltimore, MD

 

93,350

 

 

(C)

1,050

 

5,997

 

993

 

1,173

 

5,666

 

6,839

 

1,558

 

2001

 

California, MD

 

77,865

 

 

(O)

1,486

 

4,280

 

123

 

1,486

 

3,870

 

5,356

 

743

 

2004

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

87,045

 

 

 

3,124

 

9,000

 

367

 

3,124

 

8,258

 

11,382

 

1,514

 

2005

 

Laurel, MD

 

162,792

 

 

 

1,409

 

8,035

 

3,476

 

1,928

 

9,545

 

11,473

 

2,400

 

2001

 

Temple Hills, MD

 

97,200

 

 

 

1,541

 

8,788

 

2,194

 

1,800

 

9,236

 

11,036

 

2,335

 

2001

 

Grand Rapids, MI

 

87,381

 

 

(A)

185

 

1,821

 

1,466

 

325

 

2,848

 

3,173

 

1,049

 

1996

 

Portage, MI (6)

 

50,280

 

 

(O)

104

 

1,160

 

844

 

237

 

1,688

 

1,925

 

603

 

1996

 

Romulus, MI

 

42,050

 

 

(A)

308

 

1,743

 

658

 

418

 

1,927

 

2,345

 

445

 

1997

 

Wyoming, MI

 

91,158

 

 

(A)

191

 

2,135

 

1,140

 

354

 

2,791

 

3,145

 

1,042

 

1996

 

Gulfport, MS

 

61,251

 

 

(C)

172

 

1,928

 

1,006

 

338

 

2,719

 

3,057

 

976

 

1997

 

Belmont, NC

 

81,448

 

 

(O)

385

 

2,196

 

663

 

451

 

2,293

 

2,744

 

609

 

2001

 

Burlington I, NC

 

109,346

 

 

(A)

498

 

2,837

 

460

 

498

 

2,732

 

3,230

 

741

 

2001

 

Burlington II, NC

 

42,205

 

 

(O)

320

 

1,829

 

307

 

340

 

1,748

 

2,088

 

458

 

2001

 

Cary, NC

 

112,324

 

 

(A)

543

 

3,097

 

441

 

543

 

3,317

 

3,860

 

977

 

2001

 

Charlotte, NC

 

69,000

 

 

 

782

 

4,429

 

1,391

 

1,068

 

4,704

 

5,772

 

1,064

 

1999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-32



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Subsequent

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Raleigh, NC

 

48,675

 

 

(O)

209

 

2,398

 

229

 

296

 

2,498

 

2,794

 

901

 

1998

 

Brick, NJ

 

51,725

 

 

(O)

234

 

2,762

 

1,332

 

485

 

3,818

 

4,303

 

1,517

 

1994

 

Cherry Hill, NJ

 

52,600

 

 

 

222

 

1,260

 

3

 

222

 

1,263

 

1,485

 

14

 

2010

 

Clifton, NJ

 

105,550

 

 

(A)

4,346

 

12,520

 

171

 

4,346

 

11,154

 

15,500

 

1,905

 

2005

 

Cranford, NJ

 

91,250

 

 

(G)

290

 

3,493

 

2,182

 

779

 

5,159

 

5,938

 

1,936

 

1994

 

East Hanover, NJ

 

107,579

 

 

 

504

 

5,763

 

3,903

 

1,315

 

8,831

 

10,146

 

3,326

 

1994

 

Egg Harbor, NJ

 

39,425

 

 

 

104

 

592

 

1

 

104

 

592

 

696

 

6

 

2010

 

Egg Harbor, NJ

 

71,175

 

 

 

284

 

1,608

 

1

 

284

 

1,609

 

1,893

 

16

 

2010

 

Elizabeth, NJ

 

38,830

 

 

 

751

 

2,164

 

277

 

751

 

2,169

 

2,920

 

406

 

2005

 

Fairview, NJ

 

27,925

 

 

(G)

246

 

2,759

 

326

 

246

 

3,019

 

3,265

 

1,222

 

1997

 

Hamilton, NJ

 

70,550

 

 

(O)

1,885

 

5,430

 

258

 

1,893

 

5,676

 

7,569

 

1,306

 

2006

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

34,180

 

 

(G)

1,370

 

3,947

 

558

 

1,370

 

4,016

 

5,386

 

749

 

2005

 

Linden, NJ

 

100,325

 

 

(O)

517

 

6,008

 

1,979

 

1,043

 

7,419

 

8,462

 

2,734

 

1994

 

Morris Township, NJ (5)

 

71,776

 

 

 

500

 

5,602

 

2,564

 

1,072

 

7,558

 

8,630

 

2,787

 

1997

 

Parsippany, NJ

 

66,325

 

 

(G)

475

 

5,322

 

1,963

 

844

 

6,823

 

7,667

 

2,501

 

1997

 

Randolph, NJ

 

52,565

 

 

 

855

 

4,872

 

1,259

 

1,108

 

4,848

 

5,956

 

1,208

 

2002

 

Sewell, NJ

 

57,830

 

 

 

484

 

2,766

 

1,170

 

706

 

3,124

 

3,830

 

824

 

2001

 

Albuquerque I, NM

 

65,927

 

 

(B)

1,039

 

3,395

 

212

 

1,039

 

3,070

 

4,109

 

596

 

2005

 

Albuquerque II, NM

 

58,598

 

 

(B)

1,163

 

3,801

 

204

 

1,163

 

3,406

 

4,569

 

639

 

2005

 

Albuquerque IV, NM

 

57,536

 

 

(B)

664

 

2,171

 

226

 

664

 

2,043

 

2,707

 

391

 

2005

 

Carlsbad, NM

 

39,999

 

 

 

490

 

1,613

 

100

 

491

 

1,461

 

1,952

 

295

 

2005

 

Deming, NM

 

33,005

 

 

 

338

 

1,114

 

159

 

339

 

1,098

 

1,437

 

228

 

2005

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

65,740

 

 

 

965

 

3,268

 

214

 

969

 

3,152

 

4,121

 

581

 

2005

 

Lovington, NM

 

15,550

 

 

 

222

 

740

 

 

169

 

564

 

733

 

111

 

2005

 

Silver City, NM

 

26,975

 

 

 

153

 

504

 

125

 

153

 

545

 

698

 

122

 

2005

 

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

24,010

 

 

 

10

 

34

 

83

 

11

 

100

 

111

 

39

 

2005

 

Las Vegas I, NV

 

47,882

 

 

(O)

1,851

 

2,986

 

279

 

1,851

 

3,258

 

5,109

 

839

 

2006

 

Las Vegas II, NV

 

48,850

 

 

(O)

3,354

 

5,411

 

173

 

3,355

 

5,579

 

8,934

 

1,438

 

2006

 

Jamaica, NY

 

88,415

 

 

 

2,043

 

11,658

 

1,067

 

2,043

 

10,248

 

12,291

 

2,305

 

2001

 

Bronx, NY

 

66,865

 

 

 

2,014

 

11,411

 

76

 

2,014

 

11,487

 

13,501

 

347

 

2010

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

56,970

 

 

 

1,795

 

10,172

 

14

 

1,795

 

10,186

 

11,981

 

 

2010

 

Queens, NY

 

61,090

 

 

 

1,601

 

9,073

 

95

 

1,601

 

9,168

 

10,769

 

111

 

2010

 

Wyckoff, NY

 

62,245

 

 

 

1,961

 

11,113

 

32

 

1,961

 

11,145

 

13,106

 

 

2010

 

New Rochelle, NY

 

48,431

 

 

(A)

1,673

 

4,827

 

125

 

1,673

 

4,343

 

6,016

 

777

 

2005

 

North Babylon, NY

 

78,188

 

 

 

225

 

2,514

 

4,034

 

568

 

5,887

 

6,455

 

1,915

 

1998

 

Riverhead, NY

 

38,240

 

 

(H)

1,068

 

1,149

 

159

 

1,068

 

1,120

 

2,188

 

235

 

2005

 

Southold, NY

 

58,795

 

 

(H)

2,079

 

2,238

 

209

 

2,079

 

2,093

 

4,172

 

437

 

2005

 

Boardman, OH

 

65,495

 

 

 

64

 

745

 

2,217

 

287

 

2,210

 

2,497

 

1,080

 

1980

 

Canton I, OH

 

39,750

 

 

(O)

138

 

679

 

305

 

137

 

888

 

1,025

 

179

 

2005

 

Canton II, OH

 

26,200

 

 

(O)

122

 

595

 

124

 

120

 

643

 

763

 

144

 

2005

 

Centerville I, OH

 

80,690

 

 

(O)

471

 

3,705

 

162

 

471

 

3,402

 

3,873

 

660

 

2004

 

Centerville II, OH

 

43,150

 

 

(C)

332

 

1,757

 

173

 

332

 

1,701

 

2,033

 

333

 

2004

 

Cleveland I, OH

 

46,000

 

 

 

525

 

2,592

 

121

 

524

 

2,392

 

2,916

 

486

 

2005

 

Cleveland II, OH

 

58,425

 

 

(O)

290

 

1,427

 

175

 

289

 

1,407

 

1,696

 

301

 

2005

 

Columbus, OH

 

72,155

 

 

(O)

1,234

 

3,151

 

98

 

1,239

 

3,240

 

4,479

 

806

 

2006

 

Dayton I, OH

 

43,100

 

 

(C)

323

 

2,070

 

131

 

323

 

1,934

 

2,257

 

379

 

2004

 

Dayton II, OH

 

48,149

 

 

(O)

441

 

2,176

 

188

 

440

 

2,094

 

2,534

 

417

 

2005

 

Euclid I, OH

 

46,710

 

 

(O)

200

 

1,053

 

1,980

 

317

 

2,899

 

3,216

 

1,717

 

1988

 

Euclid II, OH

 

47,275

 

 

(O)

359

 

 

1,721

 

461

 

1,599

 

2,060

 

493

 

1988

 

Grove City, OH

 

89,290

 

 

(O)

1,756

 

4,485

 

107

 

1,761

 

4,583

 

6,344

 

1,127

 

2006

 

Hilliard, OH

 

89,690

 

 

(O)

1,361

 

3,476

 

141

 

1,366

 

3,608

 

4,974

 

878

 

2006

 

Lakewood, OH

 

39,337

 

 

 

405

 

854

 

460

 

405

 

1,251

 

1,656

 

761

 

1989

 

Louisville, OH

 

53,900

 

 

(O)

257

 

1,260

 

157

 

255

 

1,251

 

1,506

 

256

 

2005

 

Marblehead, OH

 

52,300

 

 

(O)

374

 

1,843

 

170

 

373

 

1,791

 

2,164

 

377

 

2005

 

Mason, OH

 

33,900

 

 

(O)

127

 

1,419

 

109

 

149

 

1,483

 

1,632

 

590

 

1998

 

Mentor, OH

 

51,225

 

 

 

206

 

1,011

 

1,435

 

204

 

2,316

 

2,520

 

404

 

2005

 

Miamisburg, OH

 

59,930

 

 

(O)

375

 

2,410

 

268

 

375

 

2,360

 

2,735

 

445

 

2004

 

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

93,025

 

 

(O)

63

 

704

 

2,031

 

332

 

2,323

 

2,655

 

728

 

1980

 

North Canton I, OH

 

45,200

 

 

(O)

209

 

846

 

553

 

299

 

735

 

1,034

 

436

 

1979

 

North Canton II, OH

 

44,140

 

 

(O)

70

 

1,226

 

44

 

239

 

1,061

 

1,300

 

307

 

1983

 

North Olmsted I, OH

 

48,665

 

 

(O)

63

 

704

 

1,242

 

214

 

1,660

 

1,874

 

578

 

1979

 

North Olmsted II, OH

 

47,850

 

 

 

290

 

1,129

 

1,076

 

469

 

1,991

 

2,460

 

1,125

 

1988

 

North Randall, OH

 

80,099

 

 

 

515

 

2,323

 

2,922

 

898

 

4,399

 

5,297

 

1,260

 

1998

 

Perry, OH

 

63,700

 

 

(O)

290

 

1,427

 

124

 

288

 

1,365

 

1,653

 

287

 

2005

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

66,895

 

 

(O)

1,290

 

3,295

 

201

 

1,295

 

3,487

 

4,782

 

847

 

2006

 

Strongsville, OH

 

43,727

 

 

(O)

570

 

3,486

 

174

 

570

 

3,344

 

3,914

 

583

 

2007

 

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

90,281

 

 

 

525

 

766

 

2,859

 

935

 

3,183

 

4,118

 

1,014

 

1980

 

Westlake, OH

 

62,750

 

 

(O)

509

 

2,508

 

133

 

508

 

2,313

 

2,821

 

465

 

2005

 

Willoughby, OH

 

34,064

 

 

(O)

239

 

1,178

 

212

 

238

 

1,227

 

1,465

 

245

 

2005

 

Youngstown, OH

 

65,950

 

 

(A)

67

 

 

1,751

 

204

 

1,207

 

1,411

 

530

 

1977

 

Levittown, PA

 

76,180

 

 

 

926

 

5,296

 

889

 

926

 

5,218

 

6,144

 

1,455

 

2001

 

Philadelphia, PA

 

97,639

 

 

 

1,461

 

8,334

 

1,212

 

1,461

 

6,876

 

8,337

 

1,674

 

2001

 

Alcoa, TN

 

42,325

 

 

(E)

254

 

2,113

 

123

 

254

 

1,942

 

2,196

 

358

 

2005

 

F-33



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs Sub-

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

sequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

Leesburg, FL

 

59,840

 

 

 

$

96

 

$

1,079

 

$

786

 

$

214

 

$

1,257

 

$

1,961

 

$

542

 

1997

Kendall, FL

 

75,395

 

(K)

 

2,350

 

8,106

 

(765

)

2,350

 

6,573

 

9,691

 

133

 

2007

Lutz I, FL

 

72,495

 

 

 

901

 

2,478

 

78

 

901

 

2,556

 

3,457

 

419

 

2004

Lutz II, FL

 

69,292

 

 

 

992

 

2,868

 

115

 

992

 

2,983

 

3,975

 

482

 

2004

Margate I, FL

 

54,405

 

(A)

 

161

 

1,763

 

1,551

 

399

 

3,076

 

3,475

 

869

 

1994

Margate II, FL

 

65,168

 

 

 

132

 

1,473

 

1,667

 

383

 

2,889

 

3,272

 

731

 

1996

Merrit Island, FL

 

50,427

 

(A)

 

716

 

2,983

 

433

 

796

 

3,336

 

4,132

 

963

 

2000

Miami I, FL

 

46,925

 

(D)

 

179

 

1,999

 

1,566

 

484

 

3,261

 

3,744

 

1,007

 

1995

Miami II, FL

 

57,040

 

 

 

188

 

2,052

 

656

 

286

 

2,609

 

2,896

 

873

 

1994

Miami III, FL

 

67,060

 

(E)

 

253

 

2,544

 

1,339

 

561

 

3,575

 

4,136

 

1,039

 

1994

Miami IV, FL

 

58,315

 

 

 

193

 

2,174

 

1,786

 

516

 

3,638

 

4,153

 

1,107

 

1995

Miami V, FL

 

78,465

 

 

 

193

 

2,165

 

981

 

364

 

2,974

 

3,339

 

881

 

1995

Miami VI, FL

 

150,510

 

 

 

4,577

 

13,185

 

148

 

4,577

 

13,333

 

17,910

 

1,540

 

2005

Naples I, FL

 

48,050

 

 

 

90

 

1,010

 

2,238

 

270

 

3,067

 

3,338

 

848

 

1996

Naples II, FL

 

65,850

 

(E)

 

148

 

1,652

 

4,119

 

558

 

5,361

 

5,919

 

1,292

 

1997

Naples III, FL

 

81,145

 

(A)

 

139

 

1,561

 

3,632

 

598

 

4,734

 

5,332

 

1,608

 

1997

Naples IV, FL

 

40,975

 

 

 

262

 

2,980

 

442

 

407

 

3,277

 

3,684

 

900

 

1998

Ocala, FL

 

41,891

 

 

 

55

 

558

 

526

 

155

 

985

 

1,139

 

279

 

1994

Ocoee, FL

 

76,250

 

 

 

1,286

 

3,705

 

78

 

1,286

 

3,783

 

5,069

 

523

 

2005

Orange City, FL

 

59,636

 

 

 

1,191

 

3,209

 

60

 

1,191

 

3,269

 

4,460

 

538

 

2004

Orlando I, FL

 

52,170

 

 

 

187

 

2,088

 

450

 

240

 

2,485

 

2,725

 

943

 

1997

Orlando II, FL

 

62,864

 

(E)

 

1,589

 

4,576

 

35

 

1,589

 

4,610

 

6,199

 

650

 

2005

Orlando III, FL

 

104,165

 

 

 

1,209

 

7,768

 

124

 

1,209

 

7,892

 

9,102

 

645

 

2006

Oviedo, FL

 

49,256

 

 

 

440

 

2,824

 

127

 

440

 

2,844

 

3,391

 

241

 

2006

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

67,337

 

(D)

 

337

 

3,772

 

2,555

 

953

 

5,711

 

6,664

 

1,403

 

1997

Royal Palm Beach I, FL

 

98,961

 

(F)

 

205

 

2,148

 

2,620

 

741

 

4,232

 

4,973

 

1,196

 

1994

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

81,515

 

(K)

 

1,640

 

8,607

 

(511

)

1,640

 

7,582

 

9,736

 

146

 

2007

Sanford, FL

 

61,810

 

 

 

453

 

2,911

 

77

 

453

 

2,989

 

3,442

 

245

 

2006

Sarasota, FL

 

70,788

 

(A)

 

333

 

3,656

 

1,068

 

529

 

4,528

 

5,057

 

1,407

 

1998

St. Augustine, FL

 

59,670

 

 

 

135

 

1,515

 

3,042

 

383

 

4,308

 

4,692

 

1,114

 

1996

Stuart I, FL

 

41,324

 

 

 

154

 

1,726

 

1,154

 

319

 

2,704

 

3,034

 

893

 

1997

Stuart II, FL

 

86,924

 

(E)

 

324

 

3,625

 

2,365

 

685

 

5,629

 

6,314

 

1,433

 

1997

SW Ranches, FL

 

64,955

 

 

 

1,390

 

7,598

 

(889

)

1,390

 

5,818

 

8,099

 

121

 

2007

Tampa I, FL

 

60,700

 

 

 

124

 

1,252

 

453

 

220

 

1,610

 

1,829

 

513

 

1994

Tampa II, FL

 

55,997

 

 

 

330

 

1,887

 

475

 

330

 

2,350

 

2,692

 

728

 

2001

Tampa III, FL

 

83,788

 

 

 

2,670

 

6,249

 

(532

)

2,670

 

5,182

 

8,387

 

103

 

2007

Vero Beach, FL

 

50,390

 

 

 

159

 

1,783

 

404

 

259

 

2,087

 

2,346

 

349

 

1998/1997

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

67,973

 

2,359

 

719

 

3,420

 

1,436

 

835

 

4,740

 

5,575

 

1,518

 

2001

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

93,764

 

 

 

2,129

 

8,671

 

188

 

2,129

 

8,859

 

10,988

 

1,665

 

2004

Alpharetta, GA

 

90,485

 

(F)

 

806

 

4,720

 

867

 

967

 

5,426

 

6,393

 

1,968

 

2001

Austell , GA

 

83,615

 

 

 

1,635

 

4,711

 

135

 

1,643

 

4,838

 

6,481

 

353

 

2006

Decatur, GA

 

148,480

 

 

 

616

 

6,776

 

(99

)

616

 

6,677

 

7,293

 

1,900

 

1998

Norcross, GA

 

85,390

 

(D)

 

514

 

2,930

 

659

 

632

 

3,470

 

4,103

 

1,019

 

2001

Peachtree City, GA

 

49,845

 

1,746

 

435

 

2,532

 

519

 

529

 

2,957

 

3,486

 

885

 

2001

Smyrna, GA

 

56,820

 

(F)

 

750

 

4,271

 

113

 

750

 

4,384

 

5,134

 

1,496

 

2001

Snellville, GA

 

79,950

 

 

 

1,660

 

4,781

 

91

 

1,660

 

4,872

 

6,532

 

251

 

2007

Suwanee I, GA

 

85,450

 

 

 

1,737

 

5,010

 

86

 

1,737

 

5,096

 

6,832

 

261

 

2007

Suwanee II, GA

 

79,640

 

(K)

 

800

 

6,942

 

(336

)

800

 

6,268

 

7,406

 

119

 

2007

Addison, IL

 

31,275

 

(I)

 

428

 

3,531

 

167

 

428

 

3,698

 

4,126

 

590

 

2004

Aurora, IL

 

73,845

 

 

 

644

 

3,652

 

41

 

644

 

3,693

 

4,337

 

608

 

2004

Bartlett, IL

 

51,525

 

 

 

931

 

2,493

 

67

 

931

 

2,560

 

3,491

 

419

 

2004

Hanover, IL

 

41,174

 

(E)

 

1,126

 

2,197

 

71

 

1,126

 

2,268

 

3,394

 

373

 

2004

Bellwood, IL

 

86,575

 

(E)

 

1,012

 

5,768

 

519

 

1,012

 

6,287

 

7,299

 

2,087

 

2001

Des Plaines, IL

 

74,600

 

(I)

 

1,564

 

4,327

 

157

 

1,564

 

4,484

 

6,048

 

727

 

2004

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

64,304

 

(I)

 

1,446

 

3,535

 

201

 

1,446

 

3,736

 

5,182

 

615

 

2004

Glenview, IL

 

100,115

 

(I)

 

3,740

 

10,367

 

100

 

3,740

 

10,467

 

14,207

 

1,713

 

2004

Gurnee, IL

 

80,300

 

(I)

 

1,521

 

5,440

 

183

 

1,521

 

5,623

 

7,144

 

915

 

2004

Harvey, IL

 

60,315

 

(I)

 

869

 

3,635

 

46

 

869

 

3,681

 

4,550

 

606

 

2004

Joliet, IL

 

74,350

 

(I)

 

547

 

4,704

 

59

 

547

 

4,763

 

5,310

 

782

 

2004

Kildeer, IL

 

46,475

 

(I)

 

2,102

 

2,187

 

82

 

2,102

 

2,269

 

4,371

 

368

 

2004

Lombard, IL

 

57,736

 

(I)

 

1,305

 

3,938

 

488

 

1,305

 

4,426

 

5,731

 

696

 

2004

Mount Prospect, IL

 

65,000

 

(I)

 

1,701

 

3,114

 

79

 

1,701

 

3,193

 

4,894

 

520

 

2004

Mundelein, IL

 

44,700

 

(I)

 

1,498

 

2,782

 

74

 

1,498

 

2,856

 

4,354

 

471

 

2004

North Chicago, IL

 

53,300

 

(I)

 

1,073

 

3,006

 

161

 

1,073

 

3,167

 

4,240

 

510

 

2004

Plainfield I, IL

 

53,900

 

 

 

1,770

 

1,715

 

133

 

1,770

 

1,848

 

3,618

 

304

 

2004

Plainfield II, IL

 

52,100

 

 

 

694

 

2,000

 

103

 

694

 

2,103

 

2,797

 

294

 

2005

Schaumburg, IL

 

31,235

 

 

 

538

 

645

 

94

 

538

 

739

 

1,277

 

127

 

2004

Streamwood, IL

 

64,305

 

(A)

 

1,447

 

1,662

 

152

 

1,447

 

1,814

 

3,261

 

300

 

2004

Warrensville, IL

 

48,796

 

(A)

 

1,066

 

3,072

 

89

 

1,066

 

3,161

 

4,228

 

428

 

2005

Waukegan, IL

 

79,750

 

(I)

 

1,198

 

4,363

 

94

 

1,198

 

4,457

 

5,655

 

732

 

2004

West Chicago, IL

 

48,475

 

(E)

 

1,071

 

2,249

 

125

 

1,071

 

2,374

 

3,445

 

385

 

2004

Westmont, IL

 

53,700

 

(I

 

1,155

 

3,873

 

41

 

1,155

 

3,914

 

5,069

 

643

 

2004

Wheeling I, IL

 

54,210

 

(A)

 

857

 

3,213

 

137

 

857

 

3,350

 

4,207

 

551

 

2004

Wheeling II, IL

 

67,825

 

(I)

 

793

 

3,816

 

175

 

793

 

3,991

 

4,784

 

650

 

2004

Woodridge, IL

 

50,725

 

(I)

 

943

 

3,397

 

50

 

943

 

3,447

 

4,390

 

568

 

2004

Indianapolis I, IN

 

43,600

 

(I)

 

1,871

 

1,230

 

65

 

1,871

 

1,295

 

3,166

 

220

 

2004

Indianapolis II, IN

 

44,900

 

(I)

 

669

 

2,434

 

68

 

669

 

2,502

 

3,171

 

423

 

2004

Indianapolis III, IN

 

60,850

 

(I)

 

1,229

 

2,834

 

40

 

1,229

 

2,874

 

4,103

 

473

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Subsequent

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Antioch, TN

 

76,160

 

 

(O)

588

 

4,906

 

278

 

588

 

4,517

 

5,105

 

780

 

2005

 

Cordova I, TN

 

54,125

 

 

 

296

 

2,482

 

167

 

297

 

2,303

 

2,600

 

447

 

2005

 

Cordova II, TN

 

67,700

 

2,520

 

429

 

3,580

 

263

 

429

 

3,839

 

4,268

 

991

 

2006

 

Knoxville I, TN

 

29,337

 

 

(L)

99

 

1,113

 

231

 

102

 

1,317

 

1,419

 

511

 

1997

 

Knoxville II, TN

 

38,000

 

 

(L)

117

 

1,308

 

319

 

129

 

1,590

 

1,719

 

587

 

1997

 

Knoxville III, TN

 

45,736

 

 

(O)

182

 

2,053

 

729

 

331

 

2,593

 

2,924

 

888

 

1998

 

Knoxville IV, TN

 

58,752

 

 

(O)

158

 

1,771

 

753

 

310

 

2,343

 

2,653

 

768

 

1998

 

Knoxville V, TN

 

42,790

 

 

(L)

134

 

1,493

 

426

 

235

 

1,790

 

2,025

 

733

 

1998

 

Knoxville VI, TN

 

63,440

 

 

(E)

439

 

3,653

 

186

 

440

 

3,337

 

3,777

 

606

 

2005

 

Knoxville VII, TN

 

55,094

 

 

(E)

312

 

2,594

 

213

 

312

 

2,448

 

2,760

 

457

 

2005

 

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

95,868

 

 

(E)

585

 

4,869

 

239

 

586

 

4,444

 

5,030

 

806

 

2005

 

Memphis I, TN

 

92,320

 

 

(C)

677

 

3,880

 

1,349

 

677

 

4,384

 

5,061

 

1,109

 

2001

 

Memphis II, TN

 

71,710

 

 

(K)

395

 

2,276

 

420

 

395

 

2,198

 

2,593

 

560

 

2001

 

Memphis III, TN

 

40,807

 

 

 

212

 

1,779

 

203

 

213

 

1,734

 

1,947

 

352

 

2005

 

Memphis IV, TN

 

38,750

 

 

 

160

 

1,342

 

234

 

160

 

1,387

 

1,547

 

285

 

2005

 

Memphis V, TN

 

60,120

 

 

 

209

 

1,753

 

545

 

210

 

2,052

 

2,262

 

395

 

2005

 

Memphis VI, TN

 

108,771

 

 

(K)

462

 

3,851

 

315

 

462

 

4,162

 

4,624

 

1,078

 

2006

 

Memphis VII, TN

 

115,253

 

 

(O)

215

 

1,792

 

480

 

215

 

2,267

 

2,482

 

590

 

2006

 

Memphis VIII, TN

 

96,060

 

 

(O)

355

 

2,959

 

347

 

355

 

3,299

 

3,654

 

869

 

2006

 

Nashville I, TN

 

103,310

 

 

 

405

 

3,379

 

422

 

405

 

3,340

 

3,745

 

600

 

2005

 

Nashville II, TN

 

83,584

 

 

 

593

 

4,950

 

202

 

593

 

4,478

 

5,071

 

767

 

2005

 

Nashville III, TN

 

101,475

 

 

 

416

 

3,469

 

168

 

416

 

3,620

 

4,036

 

1,021

 

2006

 

Nashville IV, TN

 

102,450

 

5,443

 

992

 

8,274

 

248

 

992

 

8,519

 

9,511

 

2,334

 

2006

 

Austin I, TX

 

59,520

 

 

 

2,239

 

2,038

 

186

 

2,410

 

1,774

 

4,184

 

368

 

2005

 

Austin II, TX

 

65,241

 

 

(I)

734

 

3,894

 

188

 

738

 

4,073

 

4,811

 

995

 

2006

 

Austin III, TX

 

70,560

 

 

 

1,030

 

5,468

 

139

 

1,035

 

5,597

 

6,632

 

1,274

 

2006

 

Baytown, TX

 

38,950

 

 

(O)

946

 

863

 

202

 

948

 

941

 

1,889

 

162

 

2005

 

Bryan, TX

 

60,450

 

 

(O)

1,394

 

1,268

 

117

 

1,396

 

1,214

 

2,610

 

239

 

2005

 

College Station, TX

 

26,550

 

 

(D)

812

 

740

 

112

 

813

 

744

 

1,557

 

146

 

2005

 

Dallas, TX

 

58,382

 

 

(F)

2,475

 

2,253

 

288

 

2,475

 

2,232

 

4,707

 

417

 

2005

 

Denton, TX

 

60,836

 

1,948

 

553

 

2,936

 

162

 

569

 

3,077

 

3,646

 

699

 

2006

 

El Paso I, TX

 

59,652

 

 

(B)

1,983

 

1,805

 

254

 

1,984

 

1,808

 

3,792

 

340

 

2005

 

El Paso II, TX

 

48,704

 

 

(B)

1,319

 

1,201

 

154

 

1,320

 

1,188

 

2,508

 

222

 

2005

 

El Paso III, TX

 

71,276

 

 

(B)

2,408

 

2,192

 

167

 

2,409

 

2,060

 

4,469

 

376

 

2005

 

El Paso IV, TX

 

67,058

 

 

(B)

2,073

 

1,888

 

0

 

2,074

 

1,629

 

3,703

 

313

 

2005

 

El Paso V, TX

 

62,300

 

 

 

1,758

 

1,617

 

124

 

1,761

 

1,516

 

3,277

 

280

 

2005

 

El Paso VI, TX

 

36,570

 

 

 

660

 

607

 

143

 

662

 

660

 

1,322

 

127

 

2005

 

El Paso VII, TX

 

34,545

 

 

 

563

 

517

 

73

 

565

 

514

 

1,079

 

103

 

2005

 

Fort Worth I, TX

 

50,621

 

 

(F)

1,253

 

1,141

 

152

 

1,253

 

1,132

 

2,385

 

211

 

2005

 

Fort Worth II, TX

 

72,925

 

 

(F)

868

 

4,607

 

183

 

874

 

4,780

 

5,654

 

1,169

 

2006

 

Frisco I, TX

 

50,854

 

 

(A)

1,093

 

3,148

 

97

 

1,093

 

2,852

 

3,945

 

510

 

2005

 

Frisco II, TX

 

71,299

 

3,193

 

1,564

 

4,507

 

130

 

1,564

 

4,077

 

5,641

 

735

 

2005

 

Frisco III, TX

 

75,215

 

 

(F)

1,147

 

6,088

 

164

 

1,154

 

6,242

 

7,396

 

1,521

 

2006

 

Frisco IV, TX

 

74,835

 

 

 

719

 

4,072

 

2

 

719

 

4,074

 

4,793

 

307

 

2010

 

Garland I, TX

 

70,100

 

3,100

 

751

 

3,984

 

383

 

767

 

4,348

 

5,115

 

969

 

2006

 

Garland II, TX

 

68,425

 

 

(F)

862

 

4,578

 

123

 

862

 

4,696

 

5,558

 

1,011

 

2006

 

Greenville I, TX

 

59,385

 

 

(O)

1,848

 

1,682

 

83

 

1,848

 

1,533

 

3,381

 

277

 

2005

 

Greenville II, TX

 

44,900

 

 

(O)

1,337

 

1,217

 

86

 

1,337

 

1,133

 

2,470

 

202

 

2005

 

Houston I, TX

 

100,630

 

 

(O)

1,420

 

1,296

 

224

 

1,422

 

1,339

 

2,761

 

248

 

2005

 

Houston II, TX

 

71,300

 

 

(O)

1,510

 

1,377

 

18

 

1,512

 

1,203

 

2,715

 

249

 

2005

 

Houston III, TX

 

61,120

 

499

 

575

 

524

 

206

 

576

 

652

 

1,228

 

133

 

2005

 

Houston IV, TX

 

43,975

 

 

(D)

960

 

875

 

150

 

961

 

901

 

1,862

 

160

 

2005

 

Houston V, TX

 

125,930

 

4,121

 

1,153

 

6,122

 

394

 

1,156

 

6,505

 

7,661

 

1,441

 

2006

 

Keller, TX

 

61,885

 

2,420

 

890

 

4,727

 

118

 

890

 

4,841

 

5,731

 

1,192

 

2006

 

La Porte, TX

 

44,850

 

 

(O)

842

 

761

 

312

 

843

 

966

 

1,809

 

217

 

2005

 

Lewisville, TX

 

58,140

 

1,771

 

476

 

2,525

 

313

 

492

 

2,819

 

3,311

 

646

 

2006

 

Mansfield, TX

 

63,075

 

 

(F)

837

 

4,443

 

110

 

843

 

4,542

 

5,385

 

1,109

 

2006

 

McKinney I, TX

 

47,040

 

1,270

 

1,632

 

1,486

 

127

 

1,634

 

1,405

 

3,039

 

243

 

2005

 

McKinney II, TX

 

70,050

 

4,091

 

855

 

5,076

 

116

 

857

 

5,186

 

6,043

 

1,278

 

2006

 

North Richland Hills, TX

 

57,175

 

 

(F)

2,252

 

2,049

 

155

 

2,252

 

1,924

 

4,176

 

360

 

2005

 

Roanoke, TX

 

59,300

 

 

(F)

1,337

 

1,217

 

115

 

1,337

 

1,162

 

2,499

 

219

 

2005

 

San Antonio I, TX

 

73,330

 

 

(O)

2,895

 

2,635

 

197

 

2,895

 

2,475

 

5,370

 

431

 

2005

 

San Antonio II, TX

 

73,230

 

 

(O)

1,047

 

5,558

 

89

 

1,052

 

5,639

 

6,691

 

1,209

 

2006

 

San Antonio III, TX

 

72,075

 

 

(O)

996

 

5,286

 

90

 

996

 

5,372

 

6,368

 

1,067

 

2007

 

Sherman I, TX

 

54,975

 

1,477

 

1,904

 

1,733

 

96

 

1,906

 

1,587

 

3,493

 

281

 

2005

 

Sherman II, TX

 

48,425

 

1,759

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

148

 

1,337

 

1,196

 

2,533

 

218

 

2005

 

 

F-33F-34



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Costs Sub-sequent
to Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

68,250

 

 

 

$

641

 

$

3,154

 

$

4

 

$

552

 

$

3,247

 

$

3,799

 

$

533

 

2004

Indianapolis V, IN

 

74,825

 

(I)

 

2,138

 

3,633

 

131

 

2,138

 

3,764

 

5,902

 

610

 

2004

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

73,353

 

(A)

 

406

 

3,496

 

151

 

406

 

3,647

 

4,053

 

589

 

2004

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

91,807

 

(I)

 

908

 

4,755

 

348

 

908

 

5,103

 

6,011

 

820

 

2004

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

80,140

 

(I)

 

887

 

3,548

 

101

 

887

 

3,649

 

4,536

 

599

 

2004

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

61,732

 

(I)

 

1,133

 

4,103

 

150

 

1,133

 

4,253

 

5,386

 

689

 

2004

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

55,474

 

 

 

112

 

1,248

 

497

 

208

 

1,649

 

1,857

 

487

 

1997

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

80,452

 

(A)

 

150

 

1,558

 

1,272

 

331

 

2,649

 

2,980

 

840

 

1997

Baton Rouge III, LA

 

60,770

 

 

 

133

 

1,487

 

625

 

271

 

1,974

 

2,245

 

561

 

1997

Prairieville, LA

 

28,319

 

 

 

90

 

1,004

 

170

 

90

 

1,174

 

1,264

 

356

 

1998

Slidell, LA

 

79,540

 

(D)

 

188

 

3,175

 

1,581

 

802

 

4,142

 

4,944

 

1,142

 

2001

Boston, MA

 

60,270

 

(F)

 

1,516

 

8,628

 

186

 

1,516

 

8,814

 

10,330

 

2,882

 

2002

Leominster, MA

 

54,081

 

(D)

 

90

 

1,519

 

2,319

 

338

 

3,591

 

3,928

 

905

 

1998

Medford, MA

 

58,577

 

(K)

 

1,330

 

7,165

 

(565

)

1,330

 

6,033

 

7,930

 

119

 

2007

Baltimore, MD

 

93,700

 

(E)

 

1,050

 

5,997

 

889

 

1,173

 

6,763

 

7,936

 

2,177

 

2001

California, MD

 

77,678

 

 

 

1,486

 

4,280

 

62

 

1,486

 

4,342

 

5,828

 

709

 

2004

Gaithersburg, MD

 

86,970

 

6,227

 

3,124

 

9,000

 

96

 

3,124

 

9,096

 

12,220

 

1,405

 

2005

Laurel, MD

 

162,297

 

(F)

 

1,409

 

8,035

 

3,309

 

1,928

 

10,825

 

12,753

 

2,919

 

2001

Temple Hills, MD

 

97,250

 

(D)

 

1,541

 

8,788

 

1,975

 

1,800

 

10,504

 

12,304

 

2,955

 

2001

Grand Rapids, MI

 

87,031

 

(A)

 

185

 

1,821

 

1,345

 

325

 

3,027

 

3,351

 

1,064

 

1996

Portage, MI

 

50,280

 

 

 

104

 

1,160

 

784

 

237

 

1,810

 

2,048

 

613

 

1996

Romulus, MI

 

42,175

 

(A)

 

308

 

1,743

 

581

 

418

 

2,214

 

2,632

 

622

 

1997

Wyoming, MI

 

91,283

 

(A)

 

191

 

2,135

 

956

 

354

 

2,928

 

3,282

 

1,074

 

1996

Biloxi, MS

 

66,394

 

 

 

148

 

1,652

 

719

 

279

 

2,240

 

2,519

 

600

 

1997

Gautier, MS

 

35,925

 

 

 

93

 

1,040

 

40

 

93

 

1,080

 

1,173

 

367

 

1997

Gulfport I, MS

 

68,320

 

 

 

128

 

1,438

 

851

 

156

 

2,261

 

2,417

 

676

 

1997

Gulfport II, MS

 

64,445

 

 

 

117

 

1,306

 

552

 

179

 

1,797

 

1,975

 

549

 

1997

Gulfport III, MS

 

61,251

 

(E)

 

172

 

1,928

 

845

 

338

 

2,607

 

2,945

 

723

 

1997

Waveland, MS

 

57,096

 

 

 

215

 

2,481

 

(445

)

392

 

1,859

 

2,251

 

155

 

1998

Belmont, NC

 

80,512

 

 

 

385

 

2,196

 

502

 

451

 

2,632

 

3,083

 

843

 

2001

Burlington I, NC

 

109,545

 

(A)

 

498

 

2,837

 

316

 

498

 

3,153

 

3,651

 

1,015

 

2001

Burlington II, NC

 

42,280

 

 

 

320

 

1,829

 

228

 

340

 

2,037

 

2,377

 

641

 

2001

Cary, NC

 

111,772

 

(A)

 

543

 

3,097

 

259

 

543

 

3,357

 

3,899

 

835

 

2001

Charlotte, NC

 

69,000

 

(F)

 

782

 

4,429

 

1,354

 

1,068

 

5,497

 

6,565

 

1,466

 

1999

Fayetteville I, NC

 

41,450

 

 

 

156

 

1,747

 

744

 

301

 

2,346

 

2,647

 

730

 

1997

Fayetteville II, NC

 

54,225

 

(F)

 

213

 

2,301

 

699

 

399

 

2,813

 

3,213

 

772

 

1997

Raleigh, NC

 

48,675

 

 

 

209

 

2,398

 

204

 

296

 

2,516

 

2,811

 

687

 

1998

Brick, NJ

 

52,740

 

 

 

234

 

2,762

 

1,273

 

485

 

3,784

 

4,269

 

1,146

 

1994

Clifton, NJ

 

105,550

 

(A)

 

4,346

 

12,520

 

109

 

4,346

 

12,629

 

16,975

 

1,621

 

2005

Cranford, NJ

 

91,250

 

 

 

290

 

3,493

 

1,984

 

779

 

4,988

 

5,767

 

1,426

 

1994

East Hanover, NJ

 

107,679

 

 

 

504

 

5,763

 

3,447

 

1,315

 

8,399

 

9,714

 

2,396

 

1994

Elizabeth, NJ

 

38,892

 

 

 

751

 

2,164

 

202

 

751

 

2,366

 

3,117

 

289

 

2005

Fairview, NJ

 

27,676

 

 

 

246

 

2,759

 

231

 

246

 

2,990

 

3,236

 

954

 

1997

Hamilton, NJ

 

70,550

 

 

 

1,885

 

5,430

 

132

 

1,893

 

5,554

 

7,446

 

402

 

2006

Hoboken, NJ

 

34,280

 

 

 

1,370

 

3,947

 

407

 

1,370

 

4,354

 

5,724

 

530

 

2005

Jersey City, NJ

 

91,361

 

 

 

397

 

4,507

 

2,530

 

1,010

 

6,424

 

7,434

 

1,840

 

1994

Linden I, NJ

 

95,575

 

 

 

517

 

6,008

 

2,864

 

1,170

 

8,219

 

9,389

 

2,365

 

1994

Linden II, NJ

 

35,800

 

 

 

 

2

 

873

 

189

 

686

 

875

 

70

 

1994

Morris Township, NJ

 

75,576

 

(D)

 

500

 

5,602

 

2,480

 

1,072

 

7,510

 

8,582

 

2,045

 

1997

Parsippany, NJ

 

66,325

 

 

 

475

 

5,322

 

1,903

 

909

 

6,790

 

7,700

 

1,924

 

1997

Randolph, NJ

 

52,565

 

(D)

 

855

 

4,872

 

1,229

 

1,108

 

5,848

 

6,956

 

1,781

 

2002

Sewell, NJ

 

57,767

 

(F)

 

484

 

2,766

 

1,135

 

706

 

3,678

 

4,385

 

1,118

 

2001

Albuquerque I, NM

 

65,927

 

(C)

 

1,039

 

3,395

 

167

 

1,039

 

3,562

 

4,601

 

515

 

2005

Albuquerque II, NM

 

58,834

 

(C)

 

1,163

 

3,801

 

141

 

1,163

 

3,942

 

5,105

 

565

 

2005

Albuquerque III, NM

 

41,016

 

 

 

519

 

1,697

 

174

 

519

 

1,870

 

2,390

 

267

 

2005

Albuquerque IV, NM

 

57,536

 

(C)

 

664

 

2,171

 

156

 

664

 

2,327

 

2,991

 

335

 

2005

Albuquerque V, NM

 

52,217

 

 

 

915

 

2,996

 

144

 

915

 

3,141

 

4,056

 

357

 

2006

Carlsbad, NM

 

39,999

 

(B)

 

490

 

1,613

 

77

 

491

 

1,689

 

2,180

 

243

 

2005

Deming, NM

 

33,005

 

(B)

 

338

 

1,114

 

78

 

339

 

1,192

 

1,531

 

173

 

2005

Las Cruces, NM

 

43,850

 

(B)

 

611

 

2,012

 

98

 

612

 

2,109

 

2,721

 

304

 

2005

Lovington, NM

 

15,751

 

(B)

 

222

 

740

 

(189

)

169

 

603

 

773

 

87

 

2005

Silver City, NM

 

26,875

 

(B)

 

153

 

504

 

67

 

153

 

571

 

724

 

85

 

2005

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

24,010

 

(B)

 

10

 

34

 

65

 

11

 

98

 

109

 

19

 

2005

Las Vegas I, NV

 

50,882

 

 

 

1,851

 

2,986

 

161

 

1,851

 

3,147

 

4,998

 

314

 

2006

Las Vegas II, NV

 

49,000

 

 

 

3,354

 

5,411

 

83

 

3,355

 

5,493

 

8,848

 

551

 

2006

Endicott, NY

 

35,930

 

 

 

779

 

838

 

77

 

779

 

915

 

1,694

 

151

 

2005

Jamaica, NY

 

89,455

 

(D)

 

2,043

 

11,658

 

346

 

2,043

 

12,004

 

14,047

 

3,931

 

2001

New Rochelle, NY

 

48,431

 

(A)

 

1,673

 

4,827

 

83

 

1,673

 

4,910

 

6,583

 

681

 

2005

North Babylon, NY

 

78,338

 

(F)

 

225

 

2,514

 

3,921

 

568

 

6,092

 

6,660

 

1,680

 

1998

Riverhead, NY

 

38,690

 

 

 

1,068

 

1,149

 

97

 

1,068

 

1,246

 

2,314

 

207

 

2005

Southold, NY

 

58,609

 

 

 

2,079

 

2,238

 

188

 

2,079

 

2,426

 

4,505

 

391

 

2005

Avon, CO

 

28,227

 

 

 

1,012

 

2,252

 

88

 

1,012

 

2,340

 

3,351

 

308

 

2005

Boardman, OH

 

65,495

 

(F)

 

64

 

745

 

2,095

 

287

 

2,617

 

2,904

 

1,292

 

1980

Brecksville, OH

 

58,452

 

 

 

228

 

2,545

 

954

 

442

 

3,286

 

3,727

 

878

 

1998

 

F-34



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs Sub-

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

sequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

Canton I, OH

 

39,750

 

 

 

$

138

 

$

679

 

$

178

 

$

137

 

$

857

 

$

995

 

$

122

 

2005

Canton II, OH

 

26,200

 

 

 

122

 

595

 

109

 

120

 

706

 

826

 

103

 

2005

Centerville I, OH

 

86,390

 

(I)

 

471

 

3,705

 

110

 

471

 

3,815

 

4,286

 

617

 

2004

Centerville II, OH

 

43,400

 

(E)

 

332

 

1,757

 

144

 

332

 

1,901

 

2,233

 

299

 

2004

Cleveland I, OH

 

45,950

 

 

 

525

 

2,592

 

114

 

524

 

2,707

 

3,231

 

403

 

2005

Cleveland II, OH

 

58,450

 

 

 

290

 

1,427

 

149

 

289

 

1,578

 

1,866

 

241

 

2005

Columbus , OH

 

66,875

 

 

 

1,234

 

3,151

 

(19

)

1,239

 

3,127

 

4,366

 

256

 

2006

Dayton I, OH

 

43,100

 

(E)

 

323

 

2,070

 

80

 

323

 

2,150

 

2,473

 

351

 

2004

Dayton II, OH

 

48,149

 

 

 

441

 

2,176

 

122

 

440

 

2,298

 

2,739

 

339

 

2005

Euclid I, OH

 

46,910

 

 

 

200

 

1,053

 

1,880

 

317

 

2,816

 

3,133

 

1,404

 

1988

Euclid II, OH

 

47,275

 

 

 

359

 

 

1,630

 

461

 

1,528

 

1,989

 

348

 

1988

Grove City, OH

 

89,290

 

 

 

1,756

 

4,485

 

82

 

1,761

 

4,562

 

6,324

 

358

 

2006

Hilliard, OH

 

89,715

 

 

 

1,361

 

3,476

 

88

 

1,366

 

3,558

 

4,924

 

278

 

2006

Hudson, OH

 

65,240

 

 

 

195

 

2,198

 

470

 

274

 

2,588

 

2,863

 

736

 

1998

Lakewood, OH

 

39,267

 

 

 

405

 

854

 

441

 

405

 

1,295

 

1,700

 

678

 

1989

Louisville, OH

 

53,960

 

 

 

257

 

1,260

 

110

 

255

 

1,372

 

1,627

 

204

 

2005

Marblehead, OH

 

52,300

 

 

 

374

 

1,843

 

146

 

373

 

1,991

 

2,363

 

291

 

2005

Mason, OH

 

33,900

 

 

 

127

 

1,419

 

56

 

149

 

1,452

 

1,602

 

447

 

1998

Mentor, OH

 

51,275

 

 

 

206

 

1,011

 

1,385

 

204

 

2,398

 

2,602

 

211

 

2005

Miamisburg, OH

 

59,930

 

(I)

 

375

 

2,410

 

101

 

375

 

2,511

 

2,886

 

413

 

2004

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

93,025

 

 

 

63

 

704

 

1,864

 

332

 

2,299

 

2,631

 

601

 

1980

North Canton I, OH

 

45,400

 

 

 

209

 

846

 

500

 

299

 

1,255

 

1,555

 

807

 

1979

North Canton II, OH

 

44,180

 

 

 

70

 

1,226

 

1

 

239

 

1,058

 

1,297

 

226

 

1983

North Olmsted I, OH

 

48,665

 

 

 

63

 

704

 

1,134

 

214

 

1,687

 

1,901

 

516

 

1979

North Olmsted II, OH

 

47,850

 

(F)

 

290

 

1,129

 

1,016

 

469

 

1,964

 

2,435

 

896

 

1988

North Randall, OH

 

80,099

 

(F)

 

515

 

2,323

 

2,778

 

898

 

4,718

 

5,616

 

1,246

 

1998

Perry, OH

 

63,850

 

 

 

290

 

1,427

 

106

 

288

 

1,535

 

1,823

 

231

 

2005

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

67,545

 

 

 

1,290

 

3,295

 

84

 

1,295

 

3,375

 

4,670

 

264

 

2006

Strongsville, OH

 

43,727

 

(K)

 

570

 

3,486

 

(315

)

570

 

2,855

 

3,741

 

57

 

2007

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

90,331

 

 

 

525

 

766

 

2,839

 

935

 

3,195

 

4,130

 

722

 

1980

Westlake, OH

 

62,750

 

 

 

509

 

2,508

 

123

 

508

 

2,632

 

3,140

 

397

 

2005

Willoughby, OH

 

34,454

 

 

 

239

 

1,178

 

127

 

238

 

1,306

 

1,544

 

195

 

2005

Youngstown, OH

 

65,950

 

(A)

 

67

 

 

1,687

 

204

 

1,550

 

1,754

 

809

 

1977

Levittown, PA

 

76,230

 

(F)

 

926

 

5,296

 

788

 

926

 

6,084

 

7,010

 

1,907

 

2001

Philadelphia, PA

 

100,347

 

(D)

 

1,461

 

8,334

 

718

 

1,461

 

9,052

 

10,513

 

3,642

 

2001

Alcoa, TN

 

42,325

 

(J)

 

254

 

2,113

 

61

 

254

 

2,173

 

2,428

 

294

 

2005

Antioch, TN

 

76,150

 

 

 

588

 

4,906

 

99

 

588

 

5,005

 

5,593

 

564

 

2005

Cordova I, TN

 

54,225

 

(G)

 

296

 

2,482

 

142

 

297

 

2,624

 

2,920

 

358

 

2005

Cordova II, TN

 

67,600

 

 

 

429

 

3,580

 

125

 

429

 

3,704

 

4,134

 

341

 

2006

Knoxville I, TN

 

29,377

 

 

 

99

 

1,113

 

99

 

102

 

1,209

 

1,311

 

382

 

1997

Knoxville II, TN

 

38,000

 

 

 

117

 

1,308

 

169

 

129

 

1,466

 

1,594

 

439

 

1997

Knoxville III, TN

 

45,736

 

 

 

182

 

2,053

 

564

 

331

 

2,469

 

2,799

 

655

 

1998

Knoxville IV, TN

 

58,852

 

 

 

158

 

1,771

 

592

 

310

 

2,211

 

2,521

 

553

 

1998

Knoxville V, TN

 

42,790

 

 

 

134

 

1,493

 

392

 

235

 

1,784

 

2,019

 

514

 

1998

Knoxville VI, TN

 

63,440

 

(J)

 

439

 

3,653

 

79

 

440

 

3,731

 

4,171

 

503

 

2005

Knoxville VII, TN

 

54,994

 

(J)

 

312

 

2,594

 

83

 

312

 

2,677

 

2,989

 

362

 

2005

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

96,518

 

(J)

 

585

 

4,869

 

107

 

586

 

4,975

 

5,561

 

670

 

2005

Memphis I, TN

 

91,300

 

(E)

 

677

 

3,880

 

1,066

 

677

 

4,945

 

5,623

 

1,506

 

2001

Memphis II, TN

 

71,960

 

 

 

395

 

2,276

 

160

 

395

 

2,436

 

2,831

 

830

 

2001

Memphis III, TN

 

41,137

 

(G)

 

212

 

1,779

 

131

 

213

 

1,909

 

2,122

 

265

 

2005

Memphis IV, TN

 

38,750

 

(G)

 

160

 

1,342

 

112

 

160

 

1,453

 

1,614

 

202

 

2005

Memphis V, TN

 

60,370

 

(G)

 

209

 

1,753

 

398

 

210

 

2,150

 

2,360

 

263

 

2005

Memphis VI, TN

 

109,317

 

 

 

462

 

3,851

 

235

 

462

 

4,086

 

4,548

 

375

 

2006

Memphis VII, TN

 

115,303

 

 

 

215

 

1,792

 

289

 

215

 

2,081

 

2,296

 

188

 

2006

Memphis VIII, TN

 

96,060

 

 

 

355

 

2,959

 

222

 

355

 

3,181

 

3,536

 

290

 

2006

Nashville I, TN

 

106,930

 

 

 

405

 

3,379

 

193

 

405

 

3,572

 

3,977

 

400

 

2005

Nashville II, TN

 

83,274

 

 

 

593

 

4,950

 

190

 

593

 

5,140

 

5,733

 

564

 

2005

Nashville III, TN

 

99,600

 

 

 

416

 

3,469

 

137

 

416

 

3,607

 

4,023

 

388

 

2006

Nashville IV, TN

 

102,425

 

 

 

992

 

8,274

 

126

 

992

 

8,400

 

9,392

 

897

 

2006

Austin I, TX

 

59,520

 

 

 

2,239

 

2,038

 

62

 

2,239

 

2,100

 

4,338

 

258

 

2005

Austin II, TX

 

65,401

 

 

 

734

 

3,894

 

120

 

738

 

4,009

 

4,748

 

369

 

2006

Austin III, TX

 

71,030

 

 

 

1,030

 

5,468

 

119

 

1,035

 

5,582

 

6,617

 

418

 

2006

Baytown, TX

 

38,950

 

 

 

946

 

863

 

59

 

948

 

921

 

1,868

 

127

 

2005

Bryan, TX

 

60,450

 

 

 

1,394

 

1,268

 

77

 

1,396

 

1,343

 

2,739

 

184

 

2005

College Station, TX

 

26,550

 

(H)

 

812

 

740

 

32

 

813

 

771

 

1,584

 

105

 

2005

Dallas, TX

 

58,707

 

 

 

2,475

 

2,253

 

115

 

2,475

 

2,367

 

4,842

 

291

 

2005

Denton, TX

 

60,836

 

2,062

 

553

 

2,936

 

75

 

569

 

2,995

 

3,564

 

215

 

2006

El Paso I, TX

 

59,864

 

(C)

 

1,983

 

1,805

 

113

 

1,984

 

1,918

 

3,901

 

255

 

2005

El Paso II, TX

 

48,692

 

(C)

 

1,319

 

1,201

 

74

 

1,320

 

1,274

 

2,594

 

169

 

2005

El Paso III, TX

 

71,276

 

(C)

 

2,408

 

2,192

 

98

 

2,409

 

2,289

 

4,698

 

303

 

2005

El Paso IV, TX

 

48,962

 

(C)

 

2,073

 

1,888

 

(271

)

2,074

 

1,616

 

3,690

 

265

 

2005

El Paso V, TX

 

62,825

 

(B)

 

1,758

 

1,617

 

79

 

1,761

 

1,693

 

3,454

 

219

 

2005

El Paso VI, TX

 

36,620

 

(B)

 

660

 

607

 

72

 

662

 

677

 

1,339

 

90

 

2005

El Paso VII, TX

 

34,545

 

(B)

 

563

 

517

 

55

 

565

 

571

 

1,136

 

76

 

2005

Fort Worth I, TX

 

49,778

 

 

 

1,253

 

1,141

 

68

 

1,253

 

1,208

 

2,462

 

149

 

2005

Fort Worth II, TX

 

72,925

 

 

 

868

 

4,607

 

76

 

874

 

4,676

 

5,551

 

430

 

2006

Frisco I, TX

 

50,854

 

(A)

 

1,093

 

3,148

 

33

 

1,093

 

3,181

 

4,274

 

439

 

2005

Frisco II, TX

 

71,339

 

3,440

 

1,564

 

4,507

 

57

 

1,564

 

4,564

 

6,128

 

628

 

2005

F-35



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2007

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encum-
brances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Costs Sub-sequent
to Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (L)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

Frisco III, TX

 

72,275

 

 

 

$

1,147

 

$

6,088

 

$

69

 

$

1,154

 

$

6,151

 

$

7,305

 

$

567

 

2006

 

Garland I, TX

 

70,000

 

3,280

 

751

 

3,984

 

231

 

767

 

4,199

 

4,966

 

293

 

2006

 

Garland II, TX

 

68,475

 

 

 

862

 

4,578

 

41

 

862

 

4,619

 

5,481

 

290

 

2006

 

Greenville I, TX

 

59,385

 

 

 

1,848

 

1,682

 

43

 

1,848

 

1,725

 

3,573

 

215

 

2005

 

Greenville II, TX

 

44,900

 

 

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

45

 

1,337

 

1,262

 

2,599

 

157

 

2005

 

Houston I, TX

 

101,350

 

 

 

1,420

 

1,296

 

89

 

1,422

 

1,383

 

2,805

 

191

 

2005

 

Houston II, TX

 

71,300

 

 

 

1,510

 

1,377

 

76

 

1,512

 

1,450

 

2,962

 

207

 

2005

 

Houston III, TX

 

60,820

 

547

 

575

 

524

 

175

 

576

 

698

 

1,274

 

85

 

2005

 

Houston IV, TX

 

43,775

 

(H)

 

960

 

875

 

67

 

961

 

941

 

1,902

 

126

 

2005

 

Houston V, TX

 

127,145

 

4,477

 

1,153

 

6,122

 

193

 

1,156

 

6,312

 

7,468

 

421

 

2006

 

Keller, TX

 

61,885

 

2,605

 

890

 

4,727

 

40

 

890

 

4,766

 

5,657

 

457

 

2006

 

La Porte, TX

 

45,100

 

 

 

842

 

761

 

101

 

843

 

861

 

1,704

 

119

 

2005

 

Lewisville, TX

 

58,465

 

1,874

 

476

 

2,525

 

99

 

492

 

2,608

 

3,100

 

186

 

2006

 

Mansfield, TX

 

63,025

 

 

 

837

 

4,443

 

60

 

843

 

4,496

 

5,339

 

415

 

2006

 

McKinney I, TX

 

47,020

 

1,374

 

1,632

 

1,486

 

62

 

1,634

 

1,546

 

3,180

 

186

 

2005

 

McKinney II, TX

 

70,050

 

4,303

 

855

 

5,076

 

45

 

857

 

5,119

 

5,976

 

493

 

2006

 

North Richland Hills, TX

 

57,025

 

 

 

2,252

 

2,049

 

56

 

2,252

 

2,105

 

4,357

 

259

 

2005

 

Roanoke, TX

 

59,400

 

 

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

46

 

1,337

 

1,263

 

2,600

 

159

 

2005

 

San Antonio I, TX

 

75,270

 

 

 

2,895

 

2,635

 

26

 

2,895

 

2,661

 

5,556

 

316

 

2005

 

San Antonio II, TX

 

73,205

 

 

 

1,047

 

5,558

 

46

 

1,052

 

5,600

 

6,652

 

351

 

2006

 

San Antonio III, TX

 

72,525

 

 

 

996

 

5,286

 

13

 

996

 

5,298

 

6,294

 

265

 

2007

 

Sherman I, TX

 

55,050

 

1,599

 

1,904

 

1,733

 

53

 

1,906

 

1,785

 

3,690

 

215

 

2005

 

Sherman II, TX

 

48,425

 

1,909

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

50

 

1,337

 

1,268

 

2,604

 

153

 

2005

 

Spring, TX

 

72,801

 

 

 

580

 

3,081

 

38

 

580

 

3,119

 

3,700

 

299

 

2006

 

Murray I, UT

 

60,280

 

(C)

 

3,847

 

1,017

 

122

 

3,848

 

1,137

 

4,985

 

157

 

2005

 

Murray II, UT

 

71,421

 

(C)

 

2,147

 

567

 

189

 

2,148

 

755

 

2,903

 

98

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

56,446

 

(C)

 

2,695

 

712

 

144

 

2,696

 

855

 

3,552

 

120

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

53,676

 

(C)

 

2,074

 

548

 

119

 

2,075

 

666

 

2,741

 

93

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

69,450

 

 

 

1,680

 

4,840

 

224

 

1,680

 

5,063

 

6,744

 

514

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

61,493

 

 

 

1,757

 

5,062

 

283

 

1,758

 

5,344

 

7,102

 

532

 

2005

 

Milwaukee, WI

 

58,515

 

(I)

 

375

 

4,333

 

113

 

375

 

4,446

 

4,821

 

731

 

2004

 

USIFB

 

25,032

 

 

 

 

7,057

 

 

 

7,057

 

7,057

 

 

2007

 

Corporate Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,202

 

6,316

 

2,542

 

1977

 

Construction in Progress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,482

 

5,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,144,216

 

 

 

$

364,263

 

$

1,339,432

 

$

200,935

 

$

393,715

 

$

1,513,651

 

$

1,916,396

 

$

269,278

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building
and Improvements

 

Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Spring, TX

 

72,751

 

 

(O)

580

 

3,081

 

114

 

580

 

3,192

 

3,772

 

798

 

2006

 

Murray I, UT

 

60,180

 

 

(B)

3,851

 

1,016

 

263

 

3,845

 

1,117

 

4,962

 

215

 

2005

 

Murray II, UT

 

71,221

 

 

(B)

2,147

 

567

 

322

 

2,148

 

794

 

2,942

 

158

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

56,446

 

 

(B)

2,695

 

712

 

237

 

2,696

 

839

 

3,535

 

173

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

53,676

 

 

(B)

2,074

 

548

 

206

 

2,075

 

668

 

2,743

 

139

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

69,475

 

 

(J)

1,680

 

4,840

 

257

 

1,680

 

4,500

 

6,180

 

714

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

61,257

 

 

(J)

1,757

 

5,062

 

330

 

1,758

 

4,767

 

6,525

 

752

 

2005

 

McLearen, VA

 

69,490

 

 

 

1,482

 

8,400

 

 

1,482

 

8,400

 

9,882

 

 

2010

 

Mannasas, VA

 

73,045

 

 

 

860

 

4,872

 

6

 

860

 

4,879

 

5,739

 

97

 

2010

 

Milwaukee, WI

 

58,500

 

 

(O)

375

 

4,333

 

134

 

375

 

3,908

 

4,283

 

762

 

2004

 

USIFB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,668

 

 

11,668

 

11,668

 

493

 

 

 

Corporate Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,672

 

 

8,672

 

8,672

 

2,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,634,618

 

 

 

351,390

 

1,283,657

 

231,889

 

374,569

 

1,368,452

 

1,743,021

 

314,530

 

 

 

 


Notes (In thousands):

(A)  This facility is part of Yasky Loan portfolio, with a balance of $80,000 as of December 31, 2010.

(B)  This facility is part of the YSI 20 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $62,459 as of December 31, 2010.

(C)  This facility is part of the YSI 6 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $76,137 as of December 31, 2010.

(D)  This facility is part of the YSI 28 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $1555 as of December 31, 2010.

(E)  This facility is part of the YSI 30 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $7,316 as of December 31, 2010.

(F) This facility is part of the YSI 34 Loan protfolio, with a balance of $14,823 as of December 31, 2010

(G)  This facility is part of the YSI 31 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $13,660 as of December 31, 2010.

(H)  This facility is part of the YSI 32 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $6,058 as of December 31, 2010.

(I)  This facility is part of the YSI 33 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $11,370 as of December 31, 2010.

(J)  This facility is part of the YSI 35 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $4,499 as of December 31, 2010.

(K)  This facility is part of the YSI 41 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $3,879 as of December 31, 2010.

(L)  This facility is part of the YSI 38 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $3,973 as of December 31, 2010.

(M)  This facility is part of the YSI 48 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $25,270 as of December 31, 2010.

(N)  Depreciation on the buildings and improvements is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 39 years.

(O)  This facility is part of the USILP secured credit facility portfolio, with a balance of $243,000 as of December 31, 2010.

This facility is part of Yasky Loan portfolio, with a balance of $80,000 as of December 31, 2007.

(B)

This facility is part of the YSI XXV Loan portfolio, with a balance of $8,201 as of December 31, 2007.

(C)

This facility is part of the YSI XX Loan portfolio, with a balance of $67,545 as of December 31, 2007.

(D)

This facility is part of the YSI II Loan portfolio, with a balance of $86,843 as of December 31, 2007.

(E)

This facility is part of the YSI VI Loan portfolio, with a balance of $79,645 as of December 31, 2007.

(F)

This facility is part of the YSI I Loan portfolio, with a balance of $86,770 as of December 31, 2007.

(G)

This facility is part of the YSI XXVI Loan portfolio, with a balance of $9,956 as of December 31, 2007.

(H)

This facility is part of the YSI XXVIII Loan portfolio, with a balance of $1,676 as of December 31, 2007.

(I)

This facility is part of the YSI III Loan portfolio, with a balance of $86,712 as of December 31, 2007.

(J)

This facility is part of the YSI XXX Loan portfolio, with a balance of $8,024 as of December 31, 2007.

(K)

This facility is part of the YSI RT Secured Term Loan portfolio, with a balance of $47,444 as of December 31, 2007.

(L)

Depreciation on the buildings and improvements is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 39 years.

 

Activity in real estate facilities during 2007, 2006,2010, 2009, and 20052008 was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Storage facilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

1,771,864

 

$

1,386,786

 

$

851,628

 

 

$

1,774,542

 

$

1,888,123

 

$

1,916,396

 

Acquisitions & improvements

 

160,256

 

384,130

 

564,305

 

 

96,612

 

13,345

 

30,295

 

Fully depreciated assets

 

(79,211

)

(40,859

)

 

Dispositions and other

 

(21,206

)

(534

)

(30,530

)

 

(49,865

)

(89,668

)

(59,168

)

Contstruction in progress

 

5,482

 

1,482

 

1,383

 

 

943

 

3,601

 

600

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

1,916,396

 

$

1,771,864

 

$

1,386,786

 

 

$

1,743,021

 

$

1,774,542

 

$

1,888,123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

205,049

 

$

140,491

 

$

122,473

 

 

$

344,009

 

$

328,165

 

$

269,278

 

Depreciation expense

 

68,355

 

64,728

 

39,949

 

 

64,387

 

73,569

 

77,580

 

Fully depreciated assets

 

(79,211

)

(40,503

)

 

Dispositions and other

 

(4,126

)

(170

)

(21,931

)

 

(14,655

)

(17,222

)

(18,693

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

269,278

 

$

205,049

 

$

140,491

 

 

$

314,530

 

$

344,009

 

$

328,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Storage facility assets

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

$

1,246,295

 

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

1,559,958

 

 

F-36F-35