Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

 

x                    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102013

 

OR

 

o                      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to

Commission file number 001-32324 (CubeSmart)

Commission file number 001-32324000-54662 (CubeSmart, L.P.)

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART

CUBESMART, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Maryland (CubeSmart)

 

20-1024732 (CubeSmart)

Delaware (CubeSmart, L.P.)

34-1837021 (CubeSmart, L.P.)

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

 

(IRS Employer

Incorporation or Organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

460 East Swedesford5 Old Lancaster Road

 

 

Suite 3000Malvern, Pennsylvania

 

Wayne, Pennsylvania

1908719355

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code(610) 293-5700535-5000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares, $0.01 par value per share, of CubeSmart

 

New York Stock Exchange

7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable

New York Stock Exchange

Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $.01 per share, of CubeSmart

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  NoneUnits of General Partnership Interest of CubeSmart, L.P.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES x NO ¨

 

CubeSmart

Yes x No o

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO x

 

CubeSmart

Yes £ No x

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes £ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x  NO o

 

CubeSmart

Yes x No £

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No o

 

CubeSmart

Yes x No £

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes x No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

CubeSmart

Yes x No £

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes x No £

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large Accelerated Filer oCubeSmart:

Accelerated Filer x

 

 

 

Non-Accelerated FilerLarge accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller Reporting Companyreporting company o

 

CubeSmart, L.P.:

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer x

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o  NO

CubeSmart

Yes o No x

CubeSmart, L.P.

Yes o No x

As of June 28, 2013, the last business day of CubeSmart’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter; the aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of CubeSmart was $2,148,192,535. As of February 25, 2014, the number of common shares of CubeSmart outstanding was 140,289,967.

 

As of June 30, 2010,28, 2013, the last business day of the registrant’sCubeSmart, L.P.’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of common sharesthe 2,280,730 units of limited partnership (the “Units”) held by non-affiliates of CubeSmart, L.P. was $36,446,065 based upon the registrant was $693,467,344.

Aslast reported sale price of February 25, 2011$15.98 per share on the numberNew York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2013 of the common shares of CubeSmart, the registrant outstanding was 99,427,944.sole general partner of CubeSmart, L.P. (For this computation, the market value of all Units beneficially owned by CubeSmart has been excluded.)

 

Documents incorporated by reference:  Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 20112014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the RegistrantCubeSmart to be filed subsequently with the SEC are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 of CubeSmart (the “Parent Company” or “CubeSmart”) and CubeSmart, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The Parent Company is a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns its assets and conducts its operations through the Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, and subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.  The Parent Company, the Operating Partnership and their consolidated subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as the “Company.” In addition, terms such as “we,” “us,” or “our” used in this report may refer to the Company, the Parent Company, and/or the Operating Partnership.

The Parent Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and, as of December 31, 2013, owned a 98.4% interest in the Operating Partnership. The remaining 1.6% interest consists of common units of limited partnership interest issued by the Operating Partnership to third parties in exchange for contributions of facilities to the Operating Partnership. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company has full and complete authority over the Operating Partnership’s day-to-day operations and management.

Management operates the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management teams of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are identical, and their constituents are officers of both the Parent Company and of the Operating Partnership.

There are few differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, which are reflected in the note disclosures in this report. The Company believes it is important to understand the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in the context of how these entities operate as a consolidated enterprise. The Parent Company is a REIT, whose only material asset is its ownership of the partnership interests of the Operating Partnership.  As a result, the Parent Company does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, issuing public equity from time to time and guaranteeing the debt obligations of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the Company and, directly or indirectly, holds the ownership interests in the Company’s real estate ventures. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the Company’s business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by the Parent Company, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates the capital required by the Company’s business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, by the Operating Partnership’s direct or indirect incurrence of indebtedness or through the issuance of partnership units of the Operating Partnership or equity interests in subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership.

The substantive difference between the Parent Company’s and the Operating Partnership’s filings is the fact that the Parent Company is a REIT with public equity, while the Operating Partnership is a partnership with no publicly traded equity. In the financial statements, this difference is primarily reflected in the equity (or capital for Operating Partnership) section of the consolidated balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of equity (or capital). Apart from the different equity treatment, the consolidated financial statements of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are nearly identical.

The Company believes that combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership into a single report will:

·facilitate a better understanding by the investors of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership by enabling them to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;

·     ��            remove duplicative disclosures and provide a more straightforward presentation in light of the fact that a substantial portion of the disclosure applies to both the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership; and

·create time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.

In order to highlight the differences between the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, the separate sections in this report for the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership specifically refer to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership. In the sections that combine disclosures of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to such disclosures as those of the Company. Although the Operating Partnership is generally the entity that directly or indirectly enters into contracts and real estate ventures and holds assets and debt, reference to the Company is appropriate because the business is one enterprise and the Parent Company operates the business through the Operating Partnership.

As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent Company consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes, and the Parent Company does not have significant assets other than its investment in the Operating Partnership. Therefore, the assets and liabilities of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements. The separate discussions of the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in this report should be read in conjunction with each other to understand the results of the Company’s operations on a consolidated basis and how management operates the Company.

This report also includes separate Item 9A - Controls and Procedures sections, signature pages and Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications for each of  the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership in order to establish that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Parent Company and the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Operating Partnership have made the requisite certifications and that the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership are compliant with Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and 18 U.S.C. §1350.

2



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

23



Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, andor this “Report”, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by U- Store-It Trust (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), containsParent Company and the Operating Partnership, contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (theor the “Exchange Act”).Act.” Forward-looking statements include statements concerning the Company’s plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information.  In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” or “intends” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy.  Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations that may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated.  Although we believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, future events and actual results, performance, transactions or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance, transactions or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.  Risks,As a result, you should not rely on or construe any forward-looking statements in this Report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, as predictions of future events or as guarantees of future performance.  We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report or as of the dates otherwise indicated in the statements.  All of our forward-looking statements, including those in this Report, are qualified in their entirety by this statement.

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this Report.  Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risks and uncertainties referred to in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Report and in our other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material,filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  These risks include, but are not limited to:to, the following:

 

·         national and local economic, business, real estate and other market conditions;

 

·         the competitive environment in which we operate, including our ability to maintain or raise occupancy and rental rates;

 

·         the execution of our business plan;

 

·         the availability of external sources of capital;

 

·         financing risks, including the risk of over-leverage and the corresponding risk of default on our mortgage and other debt and potential inability to refinance existing indebtedness;

 

·         increases in interest rates and operating costs;

 

·         counterparty non-performance related to the use of derivative financial instruments;

 

·         our ability to maintain our statusParent Company’s qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes;

 

·         acquisition and development risks;

 

·         increases in taxes, fees, and assessments from state and local jurisdictions;

 

·         changes in real estate and zoning laws or regulations;

 

·         risks related to natural disasters;

 

·         potential environmental and other liabilities;

 

·         other factors affecting the real estate industry generally or the self-storage industry in particular; and

 

·         other risks identified in our Annualthis Report on Form 10-K and, from time to time, in other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)SEC or in other documents that we publicly disseminate.

 

Given these uncertainties and the other risks identified elsewhere in this Report, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as may be required inby securities laws.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

Overview

 

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate company focused primarily on the ownership, operation, management, acquisition and development of self-storage facilities in the United States.

 

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we owned 363366 self-storage facilities located in 2620 states and in the District of Columbia containing an aggregate of approximately 23.624.7 million rentable square feet.  As of December 31, 2010,2013, approximately 76.3%88.3% of the rentable square footage at our owned facilities was leased to approximately 152,000 tenants,192,000 customers, and no single tenantcustomer represented a significant concentration of our revenues.  As of December 31, 2013 we owned facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 20 states:  Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia.  In addition, as of December 31, 2010,2013, we managed 93 properties160 facilities for third parties, bringing the total number of propertiesfacilities we owned and/or managed to 456.526.  As of December 31, 2013, we managed facilities in the following 23 states: Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

 

Our self-storage facilities are designed to offer affordable easily-accessible and secureeasily-accessible storage space for our residential and commercial customers.  Our customers rent storage unitscubes for their exclusive use, typically on a month-to-month basis. Additionally, some of our facilities offer outside storage areas for vehicles and boats.  Our facilities are designed to accommodate both residential and commercial customers, with features such as security systems and wide aisles and load-bearing capabilities for large truck access.  All of our facilities have an on-site manager during business hours, and 267,236, or approximately 74%64%, of our owned facilities have a manager who resides in an apartment at the facility.  Our customers can access their storage unitscubes during business hours, and some of our facilities provide customers with 24-hour access through computer controlled access syste ms.systems.  Our goal is to provide customers with the highest standard of facilities and service in the industry. To that end, approximately 69%78% of our owned facilities include climate controlled units, compared to the national average of 36% reported by the 2010 Self-Storage Almanac.cubes.

 

We wereThe Parent Company was formed in July 2004 as a Maryland REIT.  We own ourThe Parent Company owns its assets and conduct ourconducts its business through ourits operating partnership, U-Store-It,CubeSmart, L.P. (our “Operating Partnership”), and its subsidiaries.  We controlThe Parent Company controls the Operating Partnership as its sole general partner and, as of December 31, 2010, we2013, owned an approximately 95.4%98.4% interest in the Operating Partnership.  OurThe Operating Partnership has been engaged in virtually all aspects of the self-storage business, including the development, acquisition, management, ownership and operation of self-storage facilities.

In addition, as of December 31, 2013, we owned an economic interest in one unconsolidated real estate venture that owned 35 self-storage facilities located in Texas (34) and North Carolina (1), containing an aggregate of approximately 2.4 million rentable square feet.

 

Acquisition and Disposition Activity

 

As of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, we owned 363366 and 367381 facilities, respectively, that contained an aggregate of 23.624.7 million and 23.725.5 million rentable square feet with occupancy rates of 76.3%88.3% and 75.2%84.4%, respectively.  As of December 31, 2010 we had facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 26 states:  Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin. 

A complete listing of, and additional information about, our facilities is included in Item 2 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.  The following is a summary of our 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 acquisition and disposition activity:

4



Table of Contents

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of Facilities

 

Purchase / Sales
Price (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frisco Asset

 

Frisco, TX

 

July 2010

 

1

 

$

 5,800

 

New York City Assets

 

New York, NY

 

September 2010

 

2

 

26,700

 

Northeast Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ, NY and MA

 

November 2010

 

5

 

18,560

 

Manassas Asset

 

Manassas, VA

 

November 2010

 

1

 

6,050

 

Apopka Asset

 

Orlando, FL

 

November 2010

 

1

 

4,235

 

Wyckoff Asset

 

New York, NY

 

December 2010

 

1

 

13,600

 

McLearen Asset

 

McLearen, VA

 

December 2010

 

1

 

10,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

$

 85,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sun City Asset

 

Sun City, CA

 

October 2010

 

1

 

$

 3,100

 

Inland Empire/Fayetteville Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA amd NC

 

December 2010

 

15

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

$

 38,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2009 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

January 2009

 

1

 

$

 2,973

 

Albuquerque, NM Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

April 2009

 

1

 

2,825

 

S. Palmetto Asset

 

Ontario, CA

 

June 2009

 

1

 

5,925

 

Hotel Circle Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

July 2009

 

1

 

3,600

 

Jersey City Asset

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

August 2009

 

1

 

11,625

 

Dale Mabry Asset

 

Tampa, FL

 

August 2009

 

1

 

2,800

 

Winner Assets 1

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

September 2009

 

6

 

17,300

 

Baton Rouge Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

Baton Rouge, LA

 

September 2009

 

 

(b)

1,918

 

North H Street Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

September 2009

 

1

 

 

(c)

Boulder Assets (a)

 

Boulder, CO

 

September 2009

 

4

 

32,000

 

Winner Assets 2

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

October 2009

 

2

 

6,600

 

Brecksville Asset

 

Brecksville, OH

 

November 2009

 

1

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

 90,866

 

2008 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uptown Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

January 2008

 

1

 

$

 13,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

$

 2,175

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

2,400

 

Lakeland Asset

 

Lakeland, FL

 

April 2008

 

1

 

2,050

 

Endicott Asset

 

Union, NY

 

May 2008

 

1

 

2,250

 

Linden Asset

 

Linden, NJ

 

June 2008

 

1

 

2,825

 

Baton Rouge/Prairieville Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA

 

June 2008

 

2

 

5,400

 

Churchill Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS

 

August 2008

 

4

 

8,333

 

Biloxi/Gulf Breeze Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS/FL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

10,760

 

Deland Asset

 

Deland, FL

 

September 2008

 

1

 

2,780

 

Mobile Assets

 

Mobile, AL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

6,140

 

Hudson Assets

 

Hudson, OH

 

October 2008

 

2

 

2,640

 

Stuart/Vero Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

October 2008

 

2

 

4,550

 

Skipper Road Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2008

 

2

 

5,020

 

Waterway Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

December 2008

 

1

 

4,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

$

 61,958

 

 

5



Table of Contents

 

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of
Facilities

 

Purchase / Sale Price
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gilbert Asset

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

March 2013

 

1

 

$

6,900

 

Evanston Asset

 

Evanston, IL

 

May 2013

 

1

 

8,300

 

Delray Beach Asset

 

Delray Beach, FL

 

May 2013

 

1

 

7,150

 

Miramar Asset

 

Miramar, FL

 

June 2013

 

1

 

9,000

 

Stoneham Asset

 

Stoneham, MA

 

June 2013

 

1

 

10,600

 

Maryland/New Jersey Assets

 

Multiple locations in MD and NJ

 

June 2013

 

5

 

52,400

 

Staten Island Asset

 

Staten Island, NY

 

July 2013

 

1

 

13,000

 

Lewisville Asset

 

Lewisville, TX

 

August 2013

 

1

 

10,975

 

Chandler Asset

 

Chandler, AZ

 

September 2013

 

1

 

10,500

 

Tempe Asset

 

Tempe, AZ

 

September 2013

 

1

 

4,300

 

Clinton Asset

 

Clinton, MD

 

November 2013

 

1

 

15,375

 

Katy Asset

 

Katy, TX

 

November 2013

 

1

 

9,700

 

Richmond Asset

 

Richmond, TX

 

December 2013

 

1

 

10,497

 

Dallas Asset

 

Dallas, TX

 

December 2013

 

1

 

6,925

 

Elkridge Asset

 

Elkridge, MD

 

December 2013

 

1

 

8,200

 

Fort Lauderdale Asset

 

Fort Lauderdale, FL

 

December 2013

 

1

 

6,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

189,822

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Texas/Indiana Assets

 

Multiple locations in TX and IN

 

March 2013

 

5

 

$

11,400

 

Tennessee Assets

 

Multiple locations in TN

 

August 2013

 

8

 

25,000

 

California/Tennessee/Texas Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA, TN and TX

 

October/November 2013

 

22

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

$

126,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Houston Asset

 

Houston, TX

 

February 2012

 

1

 

$

5,100

 

Dunwoody Asset

 

Dunwoody, GA

 

February 2012

 

1

 

6,900

 

Mansfield Asset

 

Mansfield, TX

 

June 2012

 

1

 

4,970

 

Texas Assets

 

Multiple locations in TX

 

July 2012

 

4

 

18,150

 

Allen Asset

 

Allen, TX

 

July 2012

 

1

 

5,130

 

Norwalk Asset

 

Norwalk, CT

 

July 2012

 

1

 

5,000

 

Storage Deluxe Assets

 

Multiple locations in NY and CT

 

February/April/August 2012

 

6

 

201,910

 

Eisenhower Asset

 

Alexandria, VA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

19,750

 

New Jersey Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ

 

August 2012

 

2

 

10,750

 

Georgia/Florida Assets

 

Multiple locations in GA and FL

 

August 2012

 

3

 

13,370

 

Peachtree Asset

 

Peachtree City, GA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

3,100

 

HSREV Assets

 

Multiple locations in PA, NY, NJ, VA and FL

 

September 2012

 

9

 

102,000

 

Leetsdale Asset

 

Denver, CO

 

September 2012

 

1

 

10,600

 

Orlando/West Palm Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2012

 

2

 

13,010

 

Exton/Cherry Hill Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ and PA

 

December 2012

 

2

 

7,800

 

Carrollton Asset

 

Carrollton, TX

 

December 2012

 

1

 

4,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

 

$

432,340

 

6



(a)We provided $17.6 million in seller financing to the buyer as partTable of the Boulder Assets disposition.  This financing was subsequently repaid during 2010.Contents

(b)Approximately one third of the Baton Rouge Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings.  We continue to own and operate the remaining two thirds of the asset and include the asset in our total portfolio property count.

(c)The entirety of the North H Street Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings and we have removed this asset from our total portfolio asset count.  We expect to finalize compensatory terms with the State of California during 2011.

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of
Facilities

 

Purchase / Sale Price
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan Assets

 

Multiple locations in MI

 

June 2012

 

3

 

$6,362

 

Gulf Coast Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA, AL and MS

 

June 2012

 

5

 

16,800

 

New Mexico Assets

 

Multiple locations in NM

 

August 2012

 

6

 

7,500

 

San Bernardino Asset

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

5,000

 

Florida/ Tennessee Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL and TN

 

November 2012

 

3

 

6,550

 

Ohio Assets

 

Multiple locations in OH

 

November 2012

 

8

 

17,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

$59,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Burke Lake Asset

 

Fairfax Station, VA

 

January 2011

 

1

 

$14,000

 

West Dixie Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

April 2011

 

1

 

13,500

 

White Plains Asset

 

White Plains, NY

 

May 2011

 

1

 

23,000

 

Phoenix Asset

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

May 2011

 

1

 

612

 

Houston Asset

 

Houston, TX

 

June 2011

 

1

 

7,600

 

Duluth Asset

 

Duluth, GA

 

July 2011

 

1

 

2,500

 

Atlanta Assets

 

Atlanta, GA

 

July 2011

 

2

 

6,975

 

District Heights Asset

 

District Heights, MD

 

August 2011

 

1

 

10,400

 

Storage Deluxe Assets

 

Multiple locations in NY, CT and PA

 

November 2011

 

16

 

357,310

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, VA

 

November 2011

 

1

 

13,000

 

Washington, DC Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

December 2011

 

1

 

18,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

$467,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flagship Assets

 

Multiple locations in IN and OH

 

August 2011

 

18

 

$43,500

 

Portage Asset

 

Portage, MI

 

November 2011

 

1

 

1,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

$45,200

 

 

The comparability of our results of operations is affected by the timing of acquisition and disposition activities during the periods reported.  At December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, we owned 363366 and 367381 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.  The following table summarizes the change in number of owned self-storage facilities from January 1, 20092012 through December 31, 2010:2013:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1

 

367

 

387

 

Facilities acquired

 

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(1

)

Balance - March 31

 

367

 

386

 

Facilities acquired

 

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(2

)

Balance - June 30

 

367

 

384

 

Facilities acquired

 

3

 

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(16

)

Balance - September 30

 

370

 

368

 

Facilities acquired

 

9

 

 

Facilities sold

 

(16

)

(1

)

Balance - December 31

 

363

 

367

 

Financing Activities

The following summarizes certain financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2010:

·

Amended Credit Facility.  On September 29, 2010, we amended our existing $450 million credit facility. The amended credit facility consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan and a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The amended credit facility has a three year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest at a borrowing spread based on the our leverage levels plus LIBOR. We incurred $2.5 million in connection with executing this amendment. Such costs are included as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on our consolidated balance sheet.

·

Third Party Management.  On April 28, 2010, we acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”). The transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The 85 management contracts relate to facilities located in 16 states and the District of Columbia. We paid $4.1 million in cash for the contracts and recognized $1.8 million in contingent consideration. We will account for the contingent consideration in our earnings by recording the changes in fair value of the liability.

·

FacilityAcquisitions.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, we acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $85.1 million. In connection with these acquisitions, we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1

 

381

 

370

 

Facilities acquired

 

1

 

6

 

Facilities sold

 

(5

)

 

Balance - March 31

 

377

 

376

 

Facilities acquired

 

9

 

2

 

Facilities sold

 

 

(8

)

Balance - June 30

 

386

 

370

 

Facilities acquired

 

4

 

24

 

Facilities sold

 

(8

)

(7

)

Balance - September 30

 

382

 

387

 

Facilities acquired

 

6

 

5

 

Facilities sold

 

(22

)

(11

)

Balance - December 31

 

366

 

381

 

 

67



Table of Contents

 

·

Financing and Investing Activities

Facility Dispositions.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, we sold 16 self-storage facilities located throughout California and North Carolina for an aggregate sales price of approximately $38.1 million. These sales resulted in the recognition of gains that totaled $1.9 million.

·

Offering Proceeds.  During 2010, we sold 5.6 million common shares under our “at-the-market” program for an average sales price of $8.62 per share resulting in net proceeds of $47.6 million ($57.6 million of net proceeds and 8.1 million shares sold with an average sales price of $7.28 from program inception to December 31, 2010). We used the net proceeds to fund the acquisition of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.

 

The following summarizes certain financing and investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013:

·  Facility Acquisitions.  During 2013, we acquired 20 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.8 million.  In connection with these acquisitions, we allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated to $13.5 million.

·  Investment in Unconsolidated Real Estate Venture.  On December 10, 2013, we acquired a 50% ownership interest in 35 self-storage facilities located in Texas (34) and North Carolina (1) through a newly-formed joint venture.  The joint venture paid  $315.7 million for these facilities.  We and our unaffiliated partner in the joint venture each contributed 50% of the capital required to fund the acquisition.  We refer to this joint venture elsewhere in this Report as “HHF.”

·  Facility Dispositions.  During 2013, we sold 35 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate sales price of approximately $126.4 million.  In connection with these sales, we recorded gains that totaled $27.4 million.

·  Credit Facility and Term Loan Amendments.  On June 18, 2013, through amendments to its current unsecured term loans and revolving credit facility, the Company extended certain maturity dates, reduced pricing and adjusted certain covenants of its bank debt instruments.

·  Unsecured Senior Note Issuance.  On December 17, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.375% unsecured senior notes due December 15, 2023.

·  Term Loan Repayment.  On December 17, 2013, we repaid a $100 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2014 under our Credit Facility.

·  At-The-Market Equity Programs.  During 2013, under our at-the-market programs, we sold a total of 5.7 million common shares at an average sales price of $17.92 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $102.1 million under the programs.  We incurred $1.8 million of offering costs in conjunction with the sales. At December 31, 2013, 6.4 million common shares remained available for sale under the program.

Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy consists of several elements:

 

·         Maximize cash flow from our facilities — Our operating strategy focuses on maximizing sustainable rents at our facilities while achieving and sustaining occupancy targets.  We utilize our operating systems and experienced personnel to manage the balance between rental rates, discounts, and physical occupancy with an objective of maximizing our rental revenue.

 

·         Acquire facilities within targeted markets — During 2011,2014, we expectintend to completepursue selective acquisitions in markets that we believe have high barriers to entry, strong demographic fundamentals and demand for storage in excess of storage capacity.  We expect to focus our evaluation of acquisition opportunities in markets where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities.  We believe the self-storage industry will continue to afford us opportunities for growth through acquisitions due to the highly fragmented composition of the industry.  In the past, we have formed joint ventures with unaffiliated third parties, and in the future we may form additional joint ventures to facilitate the funding of future developments or acquisitions.

·Dispose of facilities not in targeted markets — During 2014, we intend to continue to opportunistically reduce exposure in slower growth, lower barrier-to-entry markets.  We intend to use proceeds from these transactions to fund acquisitions within target markets.

·Grow our third-party management business — We intend to pursue additional third-party management opportunities in markets where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities.  We intend to leverage our current platform to take advantage of consolidation in the industry.  We plan to utilize our relationships with third-party owners to help source future acquisitions.

8



Table of Contents

 

Investment and Market Selection Process

 

We maintain a disciplined and focused process in the acquisition and development of self-storage facilities.  Our investment committee, comprised of our named executive officers and led by Dean Jernigan,Christopher P. Marr, our Chief Executive Officer, oversees our investment process.  Our investment process involves six stages — identification, initial due diligence, economic assessment, investment committee approval (and when required, Board approval), final due diligence, and documentation.  Through our investment committee, we intend to focus on the following criteria:

 

·         Targeted markets — Our targeted markets include areas where we currently maintain management that can be extended to additional facilities, or where we believe that we can acquire a significant number of facilities efficiently and within a short period of time.  We evaluate both the broader market and the immediate area, typically fivethree miles around the facility, for theirits ability to support above-average demographic growth.  We seek to increase our presence primarily in areas that we expect will experience growth, including areas within Illinois, Texas, Florida, California and the Northeastern and Middle Atlantic areas of the United States and areas within Georgia, Florida, Texas, Illinois and California and to enter newadditional markets should suitable opportunities arise.

 

·         Quality of facility — We focus on self-storage facilities that have good visibility and are located near retail centers, which typically provide high traffic corridors and are generally located near residential communities and commercial customers.

 

·         Growth potential — We target acquisitions that offer growth potential through increased operating efficiencies and, in some cases, through additional leasing efforts, renovations or expansions.  In addition to acquiring single facilities, we seek to invest in portfolio acquisitions, including those offering significant potential for increased operating efficiency and the ability to spread our fixed costs across a large base of facilities.

 

Segment

 

We have one reportable segment:  we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.

 

7



Table of Contents

Concentration

 

Our self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan areas as well as ruralsuburban areas and have numerous tenantscustomers per facility.  No single tenantcustomer represented a significant concentration of our 20102013 revenues.  Our facilities in New York, Florida, California, Texas and IllinoisCalifornia provided approximately 18%17%, 15%, 10% and 7%9%, respectively, of our total 20102013 revenues.  Our facilities in New York, Florida, California and 2009Texas provided approximately 16%, 15%, 10% and 10%, respectively, of our total 2012 revenues.

 

Seasonality

 

We typically experience seasonal fluctuations in occupancy levels at our facilities, with the levels generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

 

Financing Strategy

 

Although our organizational documents do not limit the amount of debt that we may incur, weWe maintain a capital structure that we believe is reasonable and prudent and that will enable us to have ample cash flow to cover debt service and make distributions to our shareholders.  As of December 31, 2010,2013, our debt to total capitalization ratio (determined by dividing the carrying value of our total indebtedness by the sum of (a) the market value of ourthe Parent Company’s outstanding common shares, preferred shares and operating partnership units of the Operating Partnership held by third parties and (b) the carrying value of our total indebtedness) was approximately 38.5%32.8% compared to approximately 51.9%33.4% as of December 31, 2009.2012.  Our ratio of debt to the depreciatedundepreciated cost of our real estatetotal assets as of December 31, 20102013 was approximately 43.1%41.3% compared to approximately 53.7%40.9% as of December 31, 2009.2012.  We expect to finance additional investme ntsinvestments in self-storage facilities through the most attractive available sources of capital available at the time of the transaction, in a manner consistent with maintaining a strong financial position and future financial flexibility.flexibility, subject to limitations on incurrence of indebtedness in our unsecured credit facilities and the indenture that governs our unsecured notes.  These capital sources may include borrowings under the revolving portion of our unsecured credit facility, and through additional secured or unsecured financings, sales of common or preferred shares of the Parent Company in public offerings or private placements, additional issuances of debt securities and issuances of common or preferred units in our Operating Partnership in exchange for contributed propertiesfacilities or cash and formations of joint ventures.  We also may sell facilities that we no longer view as core assets and reallocate the sales proceeds to fund other growth.acquisitions.

9



Table of Contents

 

Competition

 

New self-storage facility development has intensified the competition among self-storage operators in many market areas in which we operate.  Self-storage facilities compete based on a number of factors, including location, rental rates, security, suitability of the facility’s design to prospective customers’ needs and the manner in which the facility is operated and marketed.  In particular, the number of competing self-storage facilities in a particular market could have a material effect on our occupancy levels, rental rates and on the overall operating performance of our facilities.  We believe that the primary competition for potential customers of any of our self-storage facilities comes from other self-storage facilities within a three-mile radius of that facility.  We believe our facilities are well-positioned within their respective markets and we emphasi zeemphasize customer service, convenience, security and professionalism.

 

Our key competitors include local and regional operators as well as the other public self-storage REITS, including Public Storage, Sovran Self Storage, Inc. and Extra Space Storage Inc.  These companies, some of which operate significantly more facilities than we do and have greater resources than we have, and other entities may generally be able to accept more risk than we determine is prudent for us, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of facility investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition may generally reduce the number of suitable acquisition opportunities available to us, increase the price required to consummateacquire the acquisition of particular facilities and reduce the demand for self-storage space in areas whereat our facilities are located.facilities.  Nevertheless, we believe that our experience in operating, managing, acquiring, developi ngdeveloping and obtaining financing for self-storage facilities should enable us to compete effectively.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are subject to various laws, ordinances and regulations, including regulations relating to lien sale rights and procedures and various federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and applicable state accessibility act laws (collectively, the “ADA”), all places of public accommodation are required to meet federal requirements related to physical access and use by disabled persons.  A number of other federal, state and local laws may also impose access and other similar requirements at our facilities.  A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements could result in the governmental imposition of fines or the award of damages to private litigants affected by the noncompliance.  Although we believe that our facilities comply in all material respects with these requirements (or would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material requirements because of adaptive assistance provided), a determination that one or more of our facilities is not in compliance with the ADA or similar state or local requirements would result in the incurrence of additional costs associated with bringing the facilities into compliance.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances released on or in its property.  These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances.  The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, when released, may

8



Table of Contents

adversely affect the property owner’s ability to sell the real estate or to borrow using the real estate as collateral, and may cause the property owner to incur substantial remediation costs.  In addition to claims for cleanup costs, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in a claim by a private party for personal injury or a claim by an adjacent property owner or user for property damage.  We may also become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances stored at the facilities by a customer even though storage of hazardous substances would be without our knowledge or approval and in violation of the customer’s storage lease agreement with us.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of facilities.  Whenever the environmental assessment for one of our facilities indicates that a facility is impacted by soil or groundwater contamination from prior owners/operators or other sources, we work with our environmental consultants and, where appropriate, state governmental agencies, to ensure that the facility is either cleaned up, that no cleanup is necessary because the low level of contamination poses no significant risk to public health or the environment, or that the responsibility for cleanup rests with a third party.  In certain cases, we have purchased environmental liability insurance coverage to indemnify us against claims for contamination or other adverse environmental conditions that may affect a property.

10



Table of Contents

 

We are not aware of any environmental cleanup liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  We cannot assure, you, however, that these environmental assessments and investigations have revealed or will reveal all potential environmental liabilities, that no prior owner created any material environmental condition not known to us or the independent consultant or that future events or changes in environmental laws will not result in the imposition of environmental liability on us.

 

We have not received notice from any governmental authority of any material noncompliance, claim or liability in connection with any of our facilities, nor have we been notified of a claim for personal injury or property damage by a private party in connection with any of our facilities relating to environmental conditions.

 

We are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of our facilities that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, and we do not expect that the cost of compliance with environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  We cannot assure, you, however, that this will continue to be the case.

 

Insurance

 

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We carry environmental insurance coverage on certain facilities in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorist activities, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be sufficient to cover losses.  We also carry liability insurance to insure against personal injuries that might be sustained onat our propert iesfacilities and director and officer liability insurance.

 

Offices

 

Our principal executive office isoffices are located at 460 E. Swedesford5 Old Lancaster Road, Suite 3000, Wayne,Malvern, PA 19087.19355.  Our telephone number is (610) 293-5700.  We believe that our current facilities are adequate for our present and future operations.535-5000.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we employed 1,1721,442 employees, of whom 178194 were corporate executive and administrative personnel and 9941,248 were property levelproperty-level personnel.  We believe that our relations with our employees are good.  Our employees are not unionized.

 

Available Information

 

We file registration statements, proxy statements, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC.  You may obtain copies of these documents by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.  Our

9



Table of Contents

internet website address is www.ustoreit.com.www.cubesmart.com.  You also can obtain on our website, free of charge, a copy of our annual report on Form 10-K, the Operating Partnership’s registration statement on Form 10, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports or amendments with, or furnish them to, the SEC.  Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

 

Also available on our website, free of charge, are copies of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the charters for each of the committees of our Board of Trustees — the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Compensation Committee.  Copies of each of these documents are also available in print free of charge, upon request by any shareholder.  You can obtain copies of these documents by contacting Investor Relations by mail at 460 E. Swedesford5 Old Lancaster Road, Suite 3000, Wayne,Malvern, PA 19087.19355.

11



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

Overview

 

An investment in our securities involves various risks.  Investors should carefully consider among other factors, the risks set forth below.below together with other information contained in this Report. These risks are not the only ones that we may face. Additional risks not presently known to us, or that we currently consider immaterial, may also impair our business, operationsfinancial condition, operating results and hinder our ability to make expected distributions to our shareholders.

 

Risks Related to our Business and Operations

 

Adverse macroeconomic and business conditions may significantly and negatively affect our revenues, profitabilityrental rates, occupancy levels and therefore our results of operations.

 

The United States has recently experienced an economic slowdownWe are susceptible to the effects of adverse macro-economic events that has resultedcan result in higher unemployment, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets.  Our results of operations may beare sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures.  A continuation of, or slow recovery from, ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services.  A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

 

It is difficult to determine the breadth and duration of the economic and financial market problems and the many ways in which they may affect our customers and our business in general.  Nonetheless, continuation or further worsening of these difficult financial and macroeconomic conditions could have a significant adverse effect on our sales, profitability and results of operations.

 

Many states and local jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems which may have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.

 

Many states and jurisdictions are facing severe budgetary problems.  Action that may be taken in response to these problems, such as increases in property taxes on commercial properties,facilities, changes to sales taxes or other governmental efforts, including mandating medical insurance for employees, could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

 

Our financial performance is dependent upon the economic and other conditions of the markets in which our facilities are located.

 

We are susceptible to adverse developments in the markets in which we operate, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors.  Our facilities in New York, Florida, Texas, California, Texas, Ohio, Tennessee,New Jersey, Illinois, and ArizonaConnecticut accounted for approximately 16%17%, 14%15%, 12%10%, 8%9%, 7%6%, 7%6% and 5%4%, respectively, of our total rentable square feet as of December 31, 2010.2013 revenues.  As a result of this geographic concentration of our facilities, we are particularly susceptible to adverse market conditions in these areas.  Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, or in any of the other markets in which we operate, or any decrease in demand for self-storage space resulting from the local business climate could adversely affect our rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and pay distributions to our shareholders.

 

10



Table of Contents

We face risks associated with facility acquisitions.

 

We have in the past acquired, and intend at some time in the futureto continue to acquire individual and portfolios of self-storage facilities thatfacilities.  These acquisitions would increase our size and may potentially alter our capital structure.  Although we believe that thefuture acquisitions that we expect to undertake in the futurecomplete will enhance our future financial performance, the success of such transactionsacquisitions is subject to a number of factors, including the risks that:

·we may not be able to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms;

 

·                  acquisitions may fail to perform as expected;

 

·                  the actual costs of repositioning or redeveloping acquired facilities may be higher than our estimates;

·we may be unable to obtain acquisition financing on favorable terms;

12



Table of Contents

 

·                  acquisitions may be located in new markets where we may have limited knowledge and understanding of the local economy, an absence of business relationships in the area or an unfamiliarity with local governmental and permitting procedures;

 

·                  there is only limited recourse, or no recourse, to the former owners of newly acquired facilities for unknown or undisclosed liabilities such as the clean-up of undisclosed environmental contamination; claims by tenants,customers, vendors or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the facilities; ordinary course of business expenses; and claims by local governments, adjoining propertyfacility owners, propertyfacility owner associations, and easement holders for fees, assessments, taxes on other property-relatedfacility-related changes.

As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of an acquired facility, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our financial results and cash flow.

In addition, we do not always obtain third-party appraisals of acquired facilities (and instead rely on value determinations by our senior management) and the consideration we pay in exchange for those facilities may exceed the value determined by third-party appraisals.

 

We will incur costs and will face integration challenges when we acquire additional facilities.

 

As we acquire or develop additional self-storage facilities, we will be subject to risks associated with integrating and managing new facilities, including customer retention and mortgage default risks. In the case of a large portfolio purchase, we could experience strains in our existing information management information capacity.  In addition, acquisitions or developments may cause disruptions in our operations and divert management’s attention away from day-to-day operations.  Furthermore, our profitabilityincome may sufferdecline because we will be required to expense acquisition-related costs and amortize in future periods costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.  Our failure to successfully integrate any future facilitiesacquisitions into our portfolio could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

The acquisition of new facilities that lack operating history with us will give risemake it more difficult to difficulties in predictingpredict revenue potential.

 

We intend to continue to acquire additional facilities.  These acquisitions could fail to perform in accordance with expectations.  If we fail to accurately estimate occupancy levels, rental rates, operating costs or costs of improvements to bring an acquired facility up to the standards established for our intended market position, the performance of the facility may be below expectations.  Acquired facilities may have characteristics or deficiencies affecting their valuation or revenue potential that we have not yet discovered.  We cannot assure you that the performance of facilities acquired by us will increase or be maintained under our management.

Our development activities may be more costly or difficult to complete than we anticipate.

We intend to continue to develop self-storage facilities where market conditions warrant such investment.  Once made, these investments may not produce results in accordance with our expectations. Risks associated with development and construction activities include:

·the unavailability of favorable financing sources in the debt and equity markets;

·construction cost overruns, including on account of rising interest rates, diminished availability of materials and labor, and increases in the costs of materials and labor;

·construction delays and failure to achieve target occupancy levels and rental rates, resulting in a lower than projected return on our investment; and

·complications (including building moratoriums and anti-growth legislation) in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy and other governmental permits.

 

We depend on external sources of capital that are outside of our control; the unavailability of capital from external sources could adversely affect our ability to acquire or develop facilities, satisfy our debt obligations and/or make distributions to shareholders.

 

We depend on external sources of capital to fund acquisitions and facility development, to satisfy our debt obligations and to make the required distributions to our shareholders in orderrequired to maintain our status as a REIT, which may orand these sources of capital may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.  Our access to external sources of capital depends on a number of things,factors, including the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  If we are unable to obtain external sources of capital, we may not be able to acquire or develop facilities when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our debt obligations or make distributions to shareholders that would permit us to qualify as a REIT or avoid paying tax on our REIT taxable income.

 

1113



Table of Contents

 

Rising operating expenses could reduce our cash flow and funds available for future distributions.distributions.

 

Our facilities and any other facilities we acquire or develop in the future are and will be subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may negatively affect us.  Our facilities are subject to increases in operating expenses such as real estate and other taxes, personnel costs including the cost of providing specific medical coverage to our employees, utilities, insurance, administrative expenses and costs for repairs and maintenance.  If operating expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish and limit our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

We cannot assure you of our ability to pay dividends in the future.

 

Historically, we have paid quarterly distributions to our shareholders, and we intend to continue to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our shareholders in amounts such that all or substantially all of our taxable income in each year, subject to certain adjustments, is distributed.  This, along with other factors, should enable us to continue to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.  We have not established a minimum dividends payment level, and all future distributions will be made at the discretion of our Board of Trustees.  Our ability to pay dividends will depend upon, among other factors:

 

·                  the operational and financial performance of our facilities;

 

·                  capital expenditures with respect to existing and newly acquired facilities;

 

·                  general and administrative costs associated with our operation as a publicly-held REIT;

 

·                  maintenance of our REIT status;

 

·                  the amount of, and the interest rates on, our debt;

 

·                  the absence of significant expenditures relating to environmental and other regulatory matters; and

 

·                  other risk factors described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report.

 

Certain of these matters are beyond our control and any significant difference between our expectations and actual results could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to shareholders.

 

If we are unable to promptly re-let our unitscubes or if the rates upon such re-letting are significantly lower than expected, then our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

 

We derive revenues principally from rents received from customers who rent unitscubes at our self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases.  Any delay in re-letting unitscubes as vacancies arise would reduce our revenues and harm our operating results.  In addition, lower than expected rental rates upon re-letting could adversely affect our revenues and impede our growth.

 

PropertyFacility ownership through joint ventures may limit our ability to act exclusively in our interest.

 

We have in the past co-invested with, and we may continue to co-invest with, third parties through joint ventures.  In any such joint venture, we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the facilities owned through joint ventures. Investments in joint ventures may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not present when a third party is not involved, including the possibility that joint venture partners might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions.  Joint venture partners may have business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.  Such investments also have the potential risk of impasse on strategic decisions, such as a sale, in cases where neither we nor the joint venture partner would have full contro lcontrol over the joint venture. In other circumstances, joint venture partners may have the ability without our agreement to make certain major decisions, including decisions about sales, capital expenditures and/or financing.  Any disputes that may arise between us and our joint venture partners could result in litigation or arbitration that could increase our expenses and distract our officers and/or Trustees from focusing their time and effort on our business.  In addition, we might in certain

12



Table of Contents

circumstances be liable for the actions of our joint venture partners, and the activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT, even though we do not control the joint venture.

 

14



Table of Contents

We face risks and significant competition associated with actions taken by our competitors.for customers and for acquisition and development opportunities.

 

Actions by our competitors may decrease or prevent increases of the occupancy and rental rates of our properties.facilities.  We compete with numerous developers, owners and operators of self-storage facilities, including other REITs, some of which own or may in the future own propertiesfacilities similar to ours in the same submarkets in which our propertiesfacilities are located and some of which may have greater capital resources.  In addition, due to the relatively low cost of each individual self-storage facility, other developers, owners and operators have the capability to build additional facilities that may compete with our facilities.

 

If our competitors build new facilities that compete with our facilities or offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our tenants,customers, we may lose potential tenants,customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to retain tenantscustomers when our tenants’customers’ leases expire.  As a result, our financial condition, cash flow, cash available for distribution, market price of our stockshares and ability to satisfy our debt service obligations could be materially adversely affected.  In addition, increased competition for customers may require us to make capital improvements to our facilities that we would not have otherwise made.  Any unbudgeted capital improvements we undertake may reduce cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

 

We also face significant competition for acquisitions and development opportunities.  Some of our competitors have greater financial resources than we do and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire facilities.  These competitors may also be willing to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the geographic proximity of investments and the payment of higher facility acquisition prices.  This competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us, may increase acquisition costs and may reduce demand for self-storage space in certain areas where our facilities are located and, as a result, adversely affect our operating results.

 

We may become subject to litigation or threatened litigation which may divert management’s time and attention, require us to pay damages and expenses or restrict the operation of our business.

 

We may become subject to disputes with commercial parties with whom we maintain relationships or other parties with whom we do business.  Any such dispute could result in litigation between us and the other parties.  Whether or not any dispute actually proceeds to litigation, we may be required to devote significant management time and attention to its successful resolution (through litigation, settlement or otherwise), which would detract from our management’s ability to focus on our business.  Any such resolution could involve the payment of damages or expenses by us, which may be significant.  In addition, any such resolution could involve our agreement with terms that restrict the operation of our business.

 

One type of commercial dispute could involve our use of our brand name and other intellectual property (for example, logos, signage and other marks), for which we generally have common law rights but no federal trademark registration.  There are other commercial parties, at both a local and national level, that may assert that our use of our brand names and other intellectual property conflict with their rights to use brand names and other intellectual property that they consider to be similar to ours.  Any such commercial dispute and related resolution would involve all of the risks described above, including, in particular, our agreement to restrict the use of our brand name or other intellectual property.

 

We also could be sued for personal injuries and/or property damage occurring on our properties.facilities.  We maintain liability insurance with limits that we believe adequate to provide for the defense and/or payment of any damages arising from such lawsuits.  There can be no assurance that such coverage will cover all costs and expenses from such suits.

15



Table of Contents

 

Potential losses may not be covered by insurance, which could result in the loss of our investment in a facility and the future cash flows from the facility.

 

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rental loss insurance covering all of the facilities in our portfolio.  We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate and adequate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice.  We do not carry insurance for losses such as loss from riots, war or acts of God, and, in some cases, flooding and environmental hazards, because such coverage is not available or is not available at commercially reasonable rates.  Some of our policies, such as those covering losses due to terrorism, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes, are insured subject to limitations involving large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits that may not be

13



Table of Contents

sufficient to cover losses.  If we experience a loss at a facility that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in that facility as well as the anticipated future cash flows from that facility.  Inflation, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and other factors also might make it impractical or undesirable to use insurance proceeds to replace a facility after it has been damaged or destroyed.  In addition, if the damaged facilities are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these facilities were irreparably damaged.

 

Our insurance coverage may not comply fully with certain loan requirements.

 

Certain of our propertiesfacilities serve as collateral for our mortgage-backed debt, some of which waswe assumed in connection with our acquisition of facilities thatand requires us to maintain insurance at levels and on terms that are not commercially reasonable in the current insurance environment.  We may be unable to obtain required insurance coverage if the cost and/or availability make it impractical or impossible to comply with debt covenants.  If we cannot comply with a lender’s requirements, in any respect, the lender could declare a default, thatwhich could affect our ability to obtain future financing and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows and our ability to obtain future financing.  In addition, we may be required to self-insure against certain losses or the Company’sour insurance costs may increase.

 

Potential liability for environmental contamination could result in substantial costs.

 

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulations that apply generally to the ownership of real property and the operation of self-storage facilities.  If we fail to comply with those laws, we could be subject to significant fines or other governmental sanctions.

 

Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner or operator of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at a facility and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean upclean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with contamination.  Such liability may be imposed whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of these hazardous or toxic substances.  The cost of investigation, remediation or removal of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’sour ability to sell or rent such facility or to borrow using such facility as collateral.  In addition, in connection with the ownership, operation and management of real properties,facilities, we are potentially liable for property damage or injuries to persons and property.

 

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  We carry environmental insurance coverage on certain facilities in our portfolio.  We obtain or examine environmental assessments from qualified and reputable environmental consulting firms (and intend to conduct such assessments prior to the acquisition or development of additional facilities).  The environmental assessments received to date have not revealed, nor do we have actual knowledge of, any environmental liability that we believe will have a material adverse effect on us.  However, we cannot assure you that anyour environmental assessments performed have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions, that any prior owner of any facility did not create a material environmental condition not actually known to us or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist with respect to any of our facilities.

 

Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable state accessibility act compliance may require unanticipated expenditures.

 

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and applicable state accessibility act laws (collectively, the “ADA”),ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to meet federal requirements related to physical access and use by disabled persons.  A number of other federal, state and local laws may also impose access and other similar requirements at our facilities.  A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements could result in the governmental imposition of fines or the award of damages to private litigants affected by the noncompliance.  Although we believe that our facilities comply in all material respects with these requirements (or would be eligible for applicable exemptions from material requirements because of adaptive assistance provided), a determination that one or more of our facilities is not in compliance with the ADA or s imilarsimilar state or local requirements would result in the incurrence of additional costs associated with bringing the facilities into compliance.  If we are required to make substantial modifications to comply with the ADA or similar state or local requirements, we may be required to incur significant unanticipated expenditures, which could have an adverse effect on our operating costs and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

1416



Table of Contents

 

Privacy concerns could result in regulatory changes that may harm our business.

 

Personal privacy has become a significant issue in the jurisdictions in which we operate.  Many jurisdictions in which we operate have imposed restrictions and requirements on the use of personal information by those collecting such information.  Changes to law or regulations affecting privacy, if applicable to our business, could impose additional costs and liability on us and could limit our use and disclosure of such information.

 

We face system security risks as we depend upon automated processes and the Internet.

 

We are increasingly dependent upon automated information technology processes.  While we attemptprocesses and Internet commerce, and many of our new customers come from the telephone or over the Internet.  Moreover, the nature of our business involves the receipt and retention of personal information about our customers.  We also rely extensively on third-party vendors to mitigate this risk through offsite backup proceduresretain data, process transactions and contracted data centers that include, in some cases, redundant operations, we could still be severely impacted by aprovide other systems services.  These systems and our systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer worms, viruses and other destructive or disruptive security breaches and catastrophic occurrence,events, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack.event or cyber-attack.  In addition, an increasing portion of our business operations are conducted over the Internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system failures and disruptions of operations despite our deployment of anti-virus measures.  Experiencedexperienced computer programmers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns.

 

Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may adversely impact our performance and may affect the markets on which our securities are traded.

 

Terrorist attacks against our facilities, the United States or our interests, may negatively impact our operations and the value of our securities.  Attacks or armed conflicts could negatively impact the demand for self-storage facilities and increase the cost of insurance coverage for our facilities, which could reduce our profitability and cash flow.  Furthermore, any terrorist attacks or armed conflicts could result in increased volatility in or damage to the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy.

 

Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry

 

Our performance and the value of our self-storage facilities are subject to risks associated with our propertiesfacilities and with the real estate industry.

 

Our rental revenues and operating costs and the value of our real estate assets, and consequently the value of our securities, are subject to the risk that if our facilities do not generate revenues sufficient to meet our operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, our cash flow and ability to pay distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.  Events or conditions beyond our control that may adversely affect our operations or the value of our facilities include but are not limited to:

 

·                  downturns in the national, regional and local economic climate;

 

·                  local or regional oversupply, increased competition or reduction in demand for self-storage space;

 

·                  vacancies or changes in market rents for self-storage space;

 

·                  inability to collect rent from customers;

 

·                  increased operating costs, including maintenance, insurance premiums and real estate taxes;

 

17



Table of Contents

·                  changes in interest rates and availability of financing;

 

·                  hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters, civil disturbances, terrorist acts or acts of war that may result in uninsured or underinsured losses;

 

·                  significant expenditures associated with acquisitions and development projects, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property;

15



Table of Contentsfacility;

 

·                  costs of complying with changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing usage, zoning, the environment and taxes; and

 

·                  the relative illiquidity of real estate investments.

 

In addition, prolonged periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for self-storage, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in rental revenues, which could impair our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Rental revenues are significantlyinfluenced by demand for self-storage space generally, and a decrease in such demandwould likely have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.

 

Because our portfolio of facilities consists primarily of self-storage facilities, we are subject to risks inherent in investments in a single industry.  A decrease in the demand for self-storage space would have a greater adverse effect on our rental revenues than if we owned a more diversified real estate portfolio.  Demand for self-storage space has been and could be adversely affected by ongoing weakness in the national, regional and local economies, changes in supply of, or demand for, similar or competing self-storage facilities in an area and the excess amount of self-storage space in a particular market. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for self-storage space, which could cause a decrease in our rental revenue.  Any such decrease could impair our ability to satisfy debt service obligations and make distributions to our shareholders.

 

Because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell propertiesfacilities when appropriate.

 

Real estate property investments generally cannot be sold quickly.  Also, the tax laws applicable to REITs require that we hold our facilities for investment, rather than for sale in the ordinary course of business, which may cause us to forgo or defer sales of facilities that otherwise would be in our best interest.  Therefore, we may not be able to dispose of facilities promptly, or on favorable terms, in response to economic or other market conditions, which may adversely affect our financial position.

 

Risks Related to our Qualification and Operation as a REIT

 

Failure to qualify as a REIT would subject us to U.S. federal income tax which would reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

 

We operate our business to qualify to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not binding on the IRS or any court.  As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the income that we distribute currently to our shareholders.  Many of the REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex.  The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control.  For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, such as rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws.  In addition, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot own specified amounts of debt and equity securities of some issuers.  We also are required to distribute to our shareholders with respect to each year at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, ,excludingexcluding net capital gains.  The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries and joint ventures further complicates the application of the REIT requirements for us.  Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status and, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs and the ongoing importance of factual determinations, we cannot provide any assurance that we will continue to qualify as a REIT.  Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT.  If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and are able to avail ourselves of one or more of the statutory savings provisions in order to maintain our REIT status, we would nevertheless be required to pay penalty taxes of $50,000 or more for each such failure.

 

18



Table of Contents

If we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and are unable to avail ourselves of certain savings provisions set forth in the Internal Revenue Code, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates on all of our income.  As a taxable corporation, we would not be allowed to take a deduction for distributions to shareholders in computing our taxable income or pass through long term capital gains to individual shareholders at favorable rates.  We also could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes.  We would not be able to

16



Table of Contents

elect to be taxed as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify unless the IRS were to grant us relief under certain statutory provisions.  If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes, which would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to our shareholders.  This likely would have a significant adverse effect on our earnings and likely would adversely affect the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to pay any distributions to shareholders.

 

Failure of the Operating Partnership (or a subsidiary partnership)partnership or joint venture) to be treated as a partnership would have serious adverse consequences to outour shareholders.

 

If the IRS were to successfully challenge the tax status of the Operating Partnership or any of its subsidiary partnerships or joint ventures for federal income tax purposes, the Operating Partnership or the affected subsidiary partnership or joint venture would be taxable as a corporation.  In such event we would cease to qualify as a REIT and the imposition of a corporate tax on the Operating Partnership, or a subsidiary partnership or joint venture would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution from the Operating Partnership to us and ultimately to our shareholders.

 

To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds on a short termshort-term basis during unfavorable market conditions.

 

As a REIT, we are subject to certain distribution requirements, including the requirement to distribute 90% of our REIT taxable income, thatexcluding net capital gains, which may result in our having to make distributions at a disadvantageous time or to borrow funds at unfavorable rates.  Compliance with this requirement may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

 

We will pay some taxes even if we qualify as a REIT, which will reduce the cash available for distribution to our shareholders.

 

Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be required to pay certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.  For example, we will be subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, including capital gains.  Additionally, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which dividends paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. Moreover, if we have net income from “prohibited transactions,” that income will be subject to a 100% penalty tax.  In general, prohibited transactions are sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.  The determination as t oto whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale.  We cannot guarantee that sales of our propertiesfacilities would not be prohibited transactions unless we comply with certain statutory safe-harbor provisions.

 

In addition, any net taxable income earned directly by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, or through entities that are disregarded for federal income tax purposes as entities separate from our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be subject to federal and possibly state corporate income tax.  We have elected to treat some of our subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries, including U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and we may elect to treat other subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future.  In this regard, several provisions of the laws applicable to REITs and their subsidiaries ensure that a taxable REIT subsidiary will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation.  For example, a taxable REIT subsidiary is limited in its ability to deduct certain interest payments made to an affiliated REIT.  In addition, the REIT has to pay a 100% penalty tax on some pa ymentspayments that it receives or on some deductions taken by a taxable REIT subsidiary if the economic arrangements between the REIT, the REIT’s customers, and the taxable REIT subsidiary are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.  Finally, some state and local jurisdictions may tax some of our income even though as a REIT we are not subject to federal income tax on that income because not all states and localities follow the federal income tax treatment of REITs.  To the extent that we and our affiliates are required to pay federal, state and local taxes, we will have less cash available for distributions to our shareholders.

19



Table of Contents

 

We face possible federal, state and local tax audits.

 

Because we are organized and qualify as a REIT, we are generally not subject to federal income taxes, but are subject to certain state and local taxes.  Certain entities through which we own real estate either have undergone, or are currently undergoing, tax audits.  Although we believe that we have substantial arguments in favor of our positions in the ongoing audits, in some instances there is no controlling precedent or interpretive guidance on the specific point at issue.  Collectively, tax deficiency notices received to date from the jurisdictions conducting the ongoing audits have not been

17



Table of Contents

material.  However, there can be no assurance that future audits will not occur with increased frequency or that the ultimate result of such audits will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

Risks Related to our Debt Financings

 

We face risks related to current debt maturities, including refinancing and counterparty risk.

 

Certain of our mortgages, bank loans, and unsecured debt (including our senior notes) will have significant outstanding balances on their maturity dates, commonly known as “balloon payments.”  We may not have the cash resources available to repay those amounts, and we may have to raise funds for such repayment either through the issuance of capital stock,equity or debt securities, additional bank borrowings (which may include extension of maturity dates), joint ventures or asset sales.  Furthermore, we are restricted from incurring certain additional indebtedness and making certain other changes to our capital and debt structure under the terms of the senior notes and the indenture governing the senior notes.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance theour debt on favorable terms or at all.  To the extent we cannot refinance debt on favorable terms or at all, we may be forced to dispose of propertiesfacilities on disadvantageous terms or pay higher interest rates, either of which would have an adverse impact on our financial performance and ability to pay dividends to investors

 

In addition,As a result of our interest rate hedges, swap agreements and other, similar arrangements, we face counterparty risks.

We may be exposed to the potential risk of counterparty default or non-payment with respect to interest rate hedges, swap agreements, floors, caps and other interest rate hedging contracts that we may enter into from time to time, in which event we could suffer a material loss on the value of those agreements.  Although these agreements may lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that other parties to the agreements will not perform or that we cannot enforce the agreements.  There is no assurance that our potential counterparties on these agreements are likely towill perform their obligations under such agreements.

 

Financing our future growth plan or refinancing existing debt maturities could be impacted by negative capital market conditions.

 

Recently, domestic financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and uncertainty.  OverallAt times in recent years liquidity has tightened in the domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity capital markets for which we historically sought financing.  Consequently, there is greater uncertainty regarding our ability to access the credit markets in order to attract financing on reasonable terms norterms; there can there be anyno assurance that we canwill be able to continue to issue common or preferred equity securities at a reasonable price.  Our ability to finance new acquisitions and refinance future debt maturities could be adversely impacted by our inability to secure permanent financing on reasonable terms, if at all.

 

The terms and covenants relating to our indebtedness could adversely impact our economic performance.

 

Like other real estate companies that incur debt, we are subject to risks associated with debt financing, such as the insufficiency of cash flow to meet required debt service payment obligations and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness.outstanding indebtedness at maturity.  If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, we may not be able to make distributions to shareholders at expected levels or at all and may not be able to acquire new properties.facilities.  Failure to make distributions to our shareholders could result in our failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  Furthermore, an increase in our interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  If we do not meet our debt service obligations, any facilities securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect on our cas hcash flow and ability to make distributions and, depending on the number of facilities foreclosed on, could threaten our continued viability.

 

20



Table of Contents

Our credit facilityCredit Facility contains (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will likely contain) customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that, among other things, require us to comply with certain liquidity and net worth tests.  Our ability to borrow under our credit facilitythe Credit Facility is (and any new or amended facility we may enter into from time to time will be) subject to compliance with such financial and other covenants.  In the event that we fail to satisfy these covenants, we would be in default under the credit facilityCredit Facility and may be required to repay such debt with capital from other sources.  Under such circumstances, other sources of debt or equity capital may not be available to us, or may be available only on unattractive terms.  Moreover, the presence of such covenants in our credit agreements could cause us to ope rateoperate our business with a view toward compliance with such covenants, which might not produce optimal returns for shareholders.  Similarly, the indenture under which we have issued unsecured senior notes contains customary financial covenants, including limitations on incurrence of additional indebtedness.

 

Increases in interest rates on variable rate indebtedness would increase our interest expense, which could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to shareholders.  Rising interest rates could also restrict our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures.  In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts that third parties

18



Table of Contents

are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to alter our portfolio promptly in relation to economic or other conditions.

 

Our organizational documents contain no limitation on the amount of debt we may incur.  As a result, we may become highly leveraged in the future.

 

Our organizational documents contain no limitations ondo not limit the amount of indebtedness that we or our Operating Partnership may incur.  We could alter the balance between our total outstanding indebtedness and the value of our assets at any time.  If we become more highly leveraged, then the resulting increase in debt service could adversely affect our ability to make payments on our outstanding indebtedness and to pay our anticipated distributions and/or the distributions required to maintain our REIT status, and could harm our financial condition.

 

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure

 

We are dependent upon our senior management team whose continued service is not guaranteed.

 

Our executive team, including our Named Executive Officers, havenamed executive officers, has extensive self-storage, real estate and public company experience.  Although we have employment agreements with these members of our senior management team, we cannot provide any assurance that any of them will remain in our employment.  The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management team could adversely affect our operations and our future growth.

 

We are dependent upon our on-site personnel to maximize customer satisfaction; any difficulties we encounter in hiring, training and retaining skilled field personnel may adversely affect our rental revenues.

 

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had 994 field1,248 property-level personnel involved in the management and operation of our facilities.  The customer service, marketing skills and knowledge of local market demand and competitive dynamics of our facility managers are contributing factors to our ability to maximize our rental income and to achieve the highest sustainable rent levels at each of our facilities.  We compete with various other companies in attracting and retaining qualified and skilled personnel. Competitive pressures may require that we enhance our pay and benefits package to compete effectively for such personnel.  If there is an increase in these costs or if we fail to attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel, our business and operating results could be harmed.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control, which maydiscourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seeking other change ofcontrol transactions that could involve a premium price for our shares or otherwisebenefit our shareholders.

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common shares with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of those shares, including:

 

·         “business combination moratorium/fair price” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested shareholder” (defined generally as any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof) for five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, and thereafter imposes stringent fair price and super-majority shareholder voting requirements on these combinations; and

21



Table of Contents

 

·         “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company (defined as shares which, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the shareholder, entitle the shareholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing Trustees) acquired in a “control share acquisition” (defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares” from a party other than the issuer) have no voting rights except to the extent approved by our shareholders by the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares, and are subject to redemption in certain circumstances.

 

We have opted out of these provisions of Maryland law.  However, our Board of Trustees may opt to make these provisions applicable to us at any time without shareholder approval.

 

19



Table of Contents

Our Trustees also have the discretion, granted in our bylaws and Maryland law, without shareholder approval to, among other things (1) create a staggered Board of Trustees, and (2) amend our bylaws or repeal individual bylaws in a manner that provides the Board of Trustees with greater authority.  Any such action could inhibit or impede a third party from making a proposal to acquire us at a price that could be beneficial to our shareholders.

 

Robert J. Amsdell, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Barry L. Amsdell, a former Trustee; Todd C. Amsdell, our former Chief Operating Officer and former President of our development subsidiary; and the Amsdell Entities (collectively, “The Amsdell Family”)collectively own an approximate 13.3% beneficial interest in our company on a fullydiluted basis and therefore have the ability to exercise significant influence on any matter presented to our shareholders.

The Amsdell Family collectively owns approximately 11.97% of our outstanding common shares, and an approximate 13.3%beneficial interest in our company on a fully diluted basis.  Consequently, the Amsdell Family may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for shareholder action, including the election of our Board of Trustees and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers.  As a result, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell have substantial influence on us and could exercise their influence in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our other shareholders.

Our shareholders have limited control to prevent us from making any changes to ourinvestment and financing policies.

 

Our Board of Trustees has adopted policies with respect to certain activities.  These policies may be amended or revised from time to time at the discretion of our Board of Trustees without a vote of our shareholders.  This means that our shareholders have limited control over changes in our policies.  Such changes in our policies intended to improve, expand or diversify our business may not have the anticipated effects and consequently may adversely affect our business and prospects, results of operations and share price.

 

Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our Trustees andofficers are limited.

 

Maryland law provides that a trustee or officer has no liability in that capacity if he or she performs his or her duties in good faith, in a manner he or she reasonably believes to be in our best interests and with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar circumstances.  Our declaration of trust and bylaws require us to indemnify our Trustees and officers for actions taken on behalf of the Company by them in those capacities on our behalf, to the extent permitted by Maryland law.  Accordingly, in the event that actions taken in good faith by any Trustee or officer impede our performance, our shareholders’ ability to recover damages from that Trustee or officer will be limited.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue preferred shares withterms that may discourage third parties from conducting a tender offer or seekingother change of control transactions that could involve a premium price for ourshares or otherwise benefit our shareholders.

 

Our declaration of trust permits our Board of Trustees to issue up to 40,000,000 preferred shares, of which 3,100,000 shares have already been issued, having those preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption as determined by our Board.  In addition, our Board may reclassify any unissued common shares into one or more classes or series of preferred shares.  Thus, our Board could authorize, without shareholder approval, the issuance of preferred shares with terms and conditions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction in which holders of some or a majority of our shares might receive a premium for their shares over the then-prevailing market price of our shares.  We currently do not expect that the Board would require shareholder approval prior to such a preferred issuance.  In addi tion,addition, any preferred shares that we issue would rank senior to our common shares with respect to the payment of distributions, in which case we could not pay any distributions on our common shares until full distributions have been paid with respect to such preferred shares.

 

Risks Related to our Securities

 

Additional issuances of equity securities may be dilutive to shareholders.

 

The interests of our shareholders could be diluted if we issue additional equity securities to finance future acquisitions or developments or to repay indebtedness.  Our Board of Trustees may authorize the issuance of additional equity securities, including preferred shares, without shareholder approval.  Our ability to execute our business strategy depends upon our access to an appropriate blend

20



Table of Contents

of debt financing, including unsecured lines of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including the issuance of common and preferred equity.

22



Table of Contents

 

Many factors could have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities.

 

A number of factors might adversely affect the price of our securities, many of which are beyond our control.  These factors include:

 

·                  increases in market interest rates, relative to the dividend yield on our shares.  If market interest rates go up, prospective purchasers of our securities may require a higher yield.  Higher market interest rates would not, however, result in more funds for us to distribute and, to the contrary, would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution.  Thus, higher market interest rates could cause the market price of our common sharesequity securities to go down;

 

·                  anticipated benefit of an investment in our securities as compared to investment in securities of companies in other industries (including benefits associated with tax treatment of dividends and distributions);

 

·                  perception by market professionals of REITs generally and REITs comparable to us in particular;

 

·                  level of institutional investor interest in our securities;

 

·                  relatively low trading volumes in securities of REITs;

 

·                  our results of operations and financial condition;

 

·                  investor confidence in the stock market generally; and

 

·                  additions and departures of key personnel.

 

The market value of our common sharesequity securities is based primarily upon the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions.  Consequently, our common sharesequity securities may trade at prices that are higher or lower than our net asset value per common share.equity security.  If our future earnings or cash distributions are less than expected, it is likely that the market price of our common sharesequity securities will diminish.

 

The market price of our common shares has been, and may continue to be, particularly volatile, and our shareholders may be unable to resell their shares at a profit.

 

The market price of our common shares has been subject to significant fluctuationsfluctuation and may continue to fluctuate or decline.  Between 2009January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our common stock has been particularly volatile as2013, the price of our common stockshares has ranged from a high of $9.62$19.48 (on October 18, 2013) to a low of $1.50.$8.04 (on October 7, 2011).  In the past several years, REIT stockssecurities have experienced high levels of volatility and significant declines in value from their historic highs.  Additionally, as a result of the current global credit crisis and the concurrent economic downturn in the U.S. and globally, there have been significant declines in the values of equity securities generally in the U.S. and abroad.

 

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company.  If our stockshare price is volatile, we may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources from our business.

 

23



Table of Contents

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

21



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

Overview

 

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we owned 363366 self-storage facilities that contain approximately 24.7 million rentable square feet and are located in 2620 states and the District of Columbia; and aggregating approximately 23.6 million rentable square feet.Columbia.  The following table sets forth certain summary information regarding our facilities by state as of December 31, 2010.2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

% of Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

% of Total

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

Rentable

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Number of

 

Rentable

 

Rentable

 

 

 

State

 

Facilities

 

Units

 

Square Feet

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy

 

 

Facilities

 

Units

 

Square Feet

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Florida

 

52

 

36,595

 

3,871,103

 

16.3

%

75.9

%

 

58

 

41,488

 

4,266,972

 

17.4%

 

91.0%

 

Texas

 

49

 

25,244

 

3,191,131

 

12.9%

 

87.7%

 

California

 

44

 

27,849

 

3,203,558

 

13.5

%

70.0

%

 

37

 

22,897

 

2,585,788

 

10.5%

 

88.1%

 

Texas

 

44

 

21,374

 

2,718,409

 

11.5

%

79.9

%

New York

 

31

 

35,211

 

2,219,593

 

9.0%

 

86.4%

 

Illinois

 

28

 

14,346

 

1,662,180

 

6.7%

 

90.3%

 

Arizona

 

27

 

13,998

 

1,459,919

 

5.9%

 

84.3%

 

New Jersey

 

23

 

15,268

 

1,560,033

 

6.3%

 

87.6%

 

Connecticut

 

20

 

9,065

 

1,040,489

 

4.2%

 

88.6%

 

Georgia

 

16

 

9,695

 

1,184,811

 

4.8%

 

88.8%

 

Ohio

 

33

 

15,336

 

1,873,017

 

7.8

%

75.9

%

 

14

 

8,084

 

928,434

 

3.8%

 

89.8%

 

Illinois

 

27

 

13,875

 

1,608,368

 

6.8

%

82.0

%

Tennessee

 

24

 

12,821

 

1,683,937

 

7.1

%

77.7

%

Arizona

 

24

 

11,569

 

1,246,379

 

5.3

%

80.7

%

Connecticut

 

17

 

7,091

 

847,311

 

3.6

%

78.0

%

New Jersey

 

16

 

10,366

 

1,039,610

 

4.4

%

67.5

%

Georgia

 

9

 

6,033

 

759,575

 

3.2

%

75.8

%

Indiana

 

9

 

5,157

 

592,790

 

2.5

%

73.3

%

New York

 

9

 

7,269

 

559,239

 

2.4

%

75.1

%

New Mexico

 

9

 

3,408

 

387,340

 

1.6

%

82.4

%

Colorado

 

8

 

4,061

 

492,344

 

2.1

%

83.9

%

North Carolina

 

6

 

3,859

 

462,998

 

2.0

%

74.0

%

Maryland

 

5

 

4,162

 

518,252

 

2.2

%

80.2

%

 

11

 

8,534

 

923,563

 

3.7%

 

86.6%

 

Virginia

 

4

 

2,517

 

273,267

 

1.2

%

72.3

%

 

9

 

6,717

 

692,935

 

2.8%

 

87.0%

 

Michigan

 

4

 

1,885

 

270,869

 

1.2

%

72.7

%

Colorado

 

9

 

4,760

 

568,039

 

2.3%

 

87.1%

 

Pennsylvania

 

7

 

4,828

 

513,990

 

2.1%

 

88.0%

 

North Carolina

 

6

 

3,898

 

463,459

 

1.9%

 

88.1%

 

Tennessee

 

5

 

3,270

 

467,159

 

1.9%

 

90.8%

 

Massachusetts

 

5

 

2,968

 

268,554

 

1.1%

 

80.0%

 

Utah

 

4

 

2,253

 

241,523

 

1.0

%

73.0

%

 

4

 

2,199

 

239,623

 

1.0%

 

88.9%

 

Massachusetts

 

4

 

2,378

 

207,326

 

0.9

%

65.3

%

Louisiana

 

3

 

1,415

 

195,017

 

0.8

%

80.1

%

Pennsylvania

 

2

 

1,615

 

173,819

 

0.7

%

83.2

%

New Mexico

 

3

 

1,614

 

181,974

 

0.7%

 

89.7%

 

Washington DC

 

2

 

1,801

 

146,277

 

0.6%

 

86.9%

 

Nevada

 

2

 

893

 

96,732

 

0.4

%

84.9

%

 

2

 

891

 

97,182

 

0.4%

 

86.1%

 

Alabama

 

1

 

797

 

128,999

 

0.6

%

73.5

%

Washington DC

 

1

 

752

 

63,085

 

0.3

%

89.9

%

Mississippi

 

1

 

507

 

61,251

 

0.3

%

80.9

%

Wisconsin

 

1

 

485

 

58,500

 

0.3

%

76.2

%

Total/Weighted Average

 

363

 

206,322

 

23,634,618

 

100.0

%

76.3

%

 

366

 

236,776

 

24,662,105

 

100.0%

 

88.3%

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Our Facilities

 

The following table sets forth certain additional information with respect to each of our facilities as of December 31, 2010.2013. Our ownership of each facility consists of a fee interest in the facility held by our Operating Partnership, or one of its subsidiaries, except for five of our Morris Township, NJ facility, that isfacilities, which are subject to a ground lease.leases.  In addition, small parcels of land at fivefour of our other facilities are subject to ground leases.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Mobile, AL †

 

1997

 

1974/90

 

128,999

 

73.5

%

797

 

Y

 

1.4

%

Chandler, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

47,520

 

77.4

%

437

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Glendale, AZ

 

1998

 

1987

 

56,850

 

78.6

%

517

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Green Valley, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

25,100

 

62.2

%

253

 

N

 

8.2

%

Mesa I, AZ

 

2006

 

1985

 

52,375

 

85.9

%

482

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mesa II, AZ

 

2006

 

1981

 

45,445

 

87.3

%

383

 

Y

 

8.4

%

Mesa III, AZ

 

2006

 

1986

 

58,264

 

75.1

%

489

 

Y

 

4.5

%

Phoenix I, AZ

 

2006

 

1987

 

100,762

 

76.4

%

756

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Phoenix II, AZ

 

2006

 

1974

 

45,270

 

89.0

%

402

 

Y

 

4.7

%

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1998

 

1995

 

80,425

 

83.2

%

657

 

Y

 

9.6

%

Tempe, AZ

 

2005

 

1975

 

53,890

 

77.8

%

403

 

Y

 

13.0

%

Tucson I, AZ

 

1998

 

1974

 

59,350

 

82.2

%

483

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson II, AZ

 

1998

 

1988

 

43,950

 

82.7

%

528

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Tucson III, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

49,822

 

84.6

%

481

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson IV, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

48,008

 

78.5

%

494

 

Y

 

3.6

%

Tucson V, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

45,234

 

75.8

%

416

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Tucson VI, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

40,766

 

81.5

%

408

 

Y

 

3.4

%

Tucson VII, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

52,688

 

86.4

%

595

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

46,650

 

84.4

%

445

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson IX, AZ

 

2005

 

1984

 

67,648

 

74.1

%

604

 

Y

 

2.0

%

Tucson X, AZ

 

2005

 

1981

 

46,350

 

73.0

%

421

 

N

 

0.0

%

Tucson XI, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,800

 

84.1

%

423

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,325

 

86.9

%

435

 

Y

 

4.8

%

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

45,792

 

80.4

%

509

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

2005

 

1976

 

49,095

 

88.4

%

548

 

Y

 

8.8

%

Apple Valley I, CA

 

1997

 

1984

 

73,440

 

59.3

%

527

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Apple Valley II, CA

 

1997

 

1988

 

61,555

 

75.1

%

458

 

Y

 

5.3

%

Benecia, CA

 

2005

 

1988/93/05

 

74,770

 

85.8

%

736

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Cathedral City, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/92

 

109,340

 

59.2

%

708

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Citrus Heights, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

75,620

 

70.8

%

659

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Diamond Bar, CA

 

2005

 

1988

 

103,034

 

75.0

%

898

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Escondido, CA

 

2007

 

2002

 

142,870

 

80.0

%

1,228

 

Y

 

6.5

%

Fallbrook, CA

 

1997

 

1985/88

 

46,620

 

87.5

%

449

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lancaster, CA

 

2001

 

1987

 

60,625

 

53.8

%

367

 

N

 

0.0

%

Long Beach, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

125,163

 

62.0

%

1,351

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murrieta, CA

 

2005

 

1996

 

49,815

 

83.5

%

421

 

Y

 

2.9

%

North Highlands, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

57,244

 

85.7

%

469

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Orangevale, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

50,392

 

75.1

%

525

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Palm Springs I, CA

 

2006

 

1989

 

72,675

 

62.0

%

572

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Palm Springs II, CA †

 

2006

 

1982/89

 

122,370

 

54.9

%

627

 

Y

 

8.5

%

Pleasanton, CA

 

2005

 

2003

 

85,055

 

88.0

%

692

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

54,128

 

73.0

%

454

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rialto I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

57,411

 

59.7

%

505

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Rialto II, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

99,783

 

72.0

%

749

 

N

 

0.0

%

Riverside I, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

67,170

 

80.6

%

641

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Riverside II, CA

 

2006

 

1985

 

85,196

 

50.9

%

828

 

Y

 

3.9

%

Roseville, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

59,869

 

78.2

%

549

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento I, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

51,114

 

77.9

%

540

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Sacramento II, CA

 

2005

 

1986

 

61,856

 

61.7

%

551

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

31,070

 

61.4

%

250

 

N

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino II, CA

 

1997

 

1991

 

41,546

 

69.3

%

375

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

1997

 

1985/92

 

35,671

 

73.0

%

398

 

N

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino V, CA

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

83,507

 

61.6

%

733

 

Y

 

11.8

%

San Bernardino VI, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

57,145

 

52.8

%

501

 

Y

 

4.2

%

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

2006

 

1975

 

103,860

 

55.8

%

951

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

2006

 

1978

 

78,729

 

82.0

%

623

 

Y

 

1.3

%

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

95,129

 

52.5

%

890

 

Y

 

0.0

%

San Marcos, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

37,430

 

76.4

%

244

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Santa Ana, CA

 

2006

 

1984

 

63,571

 

81.4

%

714

 

Y

 

2.4

%

South Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

51,940

 

68.0

%

412

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Spring Valley, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

55,045

 

79.5

%

714

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Temecula I, CA

 

1998

 

1985/2003

 

81,700

 

65.7

%

684

 

Y

 

46.4

%

Temecula II, CA

 

2006

 

2003

 

84,398

 

80.3

%

627

 

Y

 

51.3

%

Thousand Palms, CA

 

2006

 

1988/01

 

75,445

 

57.8

%

766

 

Y

 

27.1

%

Vista I, CA

 

2001

 

1988

 

74,405

 

83.9

%

615

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Vista II, CA

 

2005

 

2001/02/03

 

147,281

 

74.7

%

1,270

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Walnut, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

50,708

 

72.5

%

536

 

Y

 

9.2

%

West Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1984

 

39,715

 

78.1

%

484

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westminster, CA

 

2005

 

1983/98

 

68,148

 

75.2

%

558

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora, CO

 

2005

 

1981

 

75,827

 

80.9

%

603

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

2005

 

1986

 

47,975

 

92.0

%

455

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

2006

 

2001

 

62,400

 

92.9

%

425

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Denver, CO

 

2006

 

1997

 

59,200

 

83.2

%

451

 

Y

 

0.0

%

23



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

54,770

 

84.8

%

559

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Golden, CO

 

2005

 

1985

 

86,580

 

81.6

%

623

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Littleton I , CO

 

2005

 

1987

 

53,490

 

80.8

%

447

 

Y

 

37.4

%

Northglenn, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

52,102

 

77.2

%

498

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bloomfield, CT

 

1997

 

1987/93/94

 

48,700

 

71.6

%

436

 

Y

 

6.6

%

Branford, CT

 

1995

 

1986

 

50,679

 

75.9

%

431

 

Y

 

2.2

%

Bristol, CT

 

2005

 

1989/99

 

47,950

 

82.2

%

443

 

N

 

22.4

%

East Windsor, CT

 

2005

 

1986/89

 

45,800

 

78.8

%

298

 

N

 

0.0

%

Enfield, CT

 

2001

 

1989

 

52,875

 

87.9

%

369

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Gales Ferry, CT

 

1995

 

1987/89

 

54,230

 

70.9

%

597

 

N

 

6.5

%

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

2002

 

1999/00/01

 

47,125

 

76.0

%

459

 

N

 

37.6

%

Manchester II, CT

 

2005

 

1984

 

52,725

 

72.4

%

394

 

N

 

0.0

%

Milford, CT

 

1994

 

1975

 

44,885

 

82.4

%

376

 

N

 

4.0

%

Monroe, CT

 

2005

 

1996/03

 

58,500

 

71.5

%

394

 

N

 

0.0

%

Mystic, CT

 

1994

 

1975/86

 

50,725

 

82.9

%

560

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Newington I, CT

 

2005

 

1978/97

 

42,520

 

68.4

%

247

 

N

 

0.0

%

Newington II, CT

 

2005

 

1979/81

 

36,140

 

89.0

%

197

 

N

 

0.0

%

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

2005

 

1982/88/00

 

86,950

 

86.1

%

716

 

N

 

5.9

%

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

2005

 

1988/02

 

26,425

 

85.1

%

254

 

N

 

54.2

%

South Windsor, CT

 

1994

 

1976

 

72,125

 

68.3

%

553

 

Y

 

1.1

%

Stamford, CT

 

2005

 

1997

 

28,957

 

84.8

%

367

 

N

 

32.8

%

Washington, DC

 

2008

 

2002

 

63,085

 

89.9

%

752

 

Y

 

96.5

%

Boca Raton, FL

 

2001

 

1998

 

37,958

 

81.2

%

605

 

N

 

68.2

%

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

61,977

 

81.4

%

763

 

Y

 

54.2

%

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

2005

 

2001

 

61,727

 

66.9

%

580

 

Y

 

82.3

%

Bradenton I, FL

 

2004

 

1979

 

68,391

 

63.9

%

635

 

N

 

2.7

%

Bradenton II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

87,815

 

81.3

%

854

 

Y

 

40.1

%

Cape Coral, FL

 

2000*

 

2000

 

76,567

 

75.6

%

865

 

Y

 

83.5

%

Dania, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

58,270

 

69.9

%

497

 

Y

 

26.9

%

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

2004

 

1984

 

181,463

 

64.8

%

1,969

 

N

 

20.4

%

Davie, FL

 

2001*

 

2001

 

81,135

 

81.3

%

843

 

Y

 

55.6

%

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

1998*

 

1998

 

57,280

 

84.6

%

517

 

Y

 

38.8

%

Delray Beach, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

67,821

 

72.6

%

832

 

Y

 

39.3

%

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

1996

 

1986

 

110,785

 

74.9

%

828

 

Y

 

35.7

%

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

1999

 

1999

 

70,093

 

88.0

%

694

 

Y

 

46.8

%

Ft. Myers, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

67,558

 

60.3

%

592

 

Y

 

67.2

%

Jacksonville I, FL

 

2005

 

2005

 

80,376

 

86.8

%

716

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

65,070

 

91.4

%

650

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville III, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

65,575

 

93.7

%

683

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

2007

 

2006

 

77,515

 

78.7

%

701

 

N

 

100.0

%

Jacksonville V, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

82,165

 

80.4

%

702

 

N

 

82.4

%

Kendall, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

75,395

 

85.1

%

703

 

N

 

71.0

%

Lake Worth, FL †

 

1998

 

1998/02

 

161,808

 

89.6

%

1,367

 

Y

 

37.2

%

Lakeland, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

49,095

 

79.3

%

491

 

Y

 

79.4

%

Lutz I, FL

 

2004

 

2000

 

66,895

 

70.6

%

614

 

Y

 

37.0

%

Lutz II, FL

 

2004

 

1999

 

69,232

 

78.3

%

538

 

Y

 

20.6

%

Margate I, FL †

 

1994

 

1979/81

 

54,505

 

78.4

%

339

 

N

 

10.0

%

Margate II, FL †

 

1996

 

1985

 

65,186

 

78.2

%

425

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Merrit Island, FL

 

2000

 

2000

 

50,417

 

78.7

%

465

 

Y

 

56.7

%

Miami I, FL

 

1995

 

1995

 

46,825

 

83.9

%

560

 

Y

 

52.1

%

Miami II, FL

 

1994

 

1989

 

67,060

 

71.3

%

568

 

Y

 

8.0

%

Miami IV, FL

 

2005

 

1988/03

 

150,590

 

71.3

%

1,523

 

N

 

86.9

%

Naples I, FL

 

1996

 

1996

 

48,150

 

95.1

%

328

 

Y

 

26.6

%

Naples II, FL

 

1997

 

1985

 

65,850

 

83.1

%

637

 

Y

 

44.6

%

Naples III, FL

 

1997

 

1981/83

 

80,627

 

68.4

%

818

 

Y

 

23.8

%

Naples IV, FL

 

1998

 

1990

 

40,475

 

75.3

%

435

 

N

 

43.3

%

Ocoee, FL

 

2005

 

1997

 

76,130

 

80.1

%

627

 

Y

 

15.5

%

Orange City, FL

 

2004

 

2001

 

59,586

 

80.2

%

648

 

N

 

39.1

%

Orlando I, FL (6)

 

1997

 

1987

 

52,170

 

62.0

%

497

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Orlando II, FL

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

63,084

 

87.0

%

580

 

N

 

74.2

%

Orlando III, FL

 

2006

 

1988/90/96

 

104,140

 

65.6

%

791

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Orlando IV, FL

 

2010

 

2009

 

76,615

 

44.8

%

645

 

N

 

64.4

%

Oviedo, FL

 

2006

 

1988/1991

 

49,251

 

70.6

%

426

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1997

 

1997

 

67,321

 

81.6

%

697

 

Y

 

63.2

%

Royal Palm Beach I, FL †

 

1994

 

1988

 

98,961

 

61.1

%

675

 

N

 

54.5

%

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

81,415

 

69.5

%

767

 

N

 

82.3

%

Sanford, FL

 

2006

 

1988/2006

 

61,810

 

72.3

%

440

 

Y

 

28.6

%

Sarasota, FL

 

1998

 

1998

 

71,102

 

65.2

%

525

 

Y

 

42.5

%

St. Augustine, FL

 

1996

 

1985

 

59,725

 

71.9

%

698

 

Y

 

29.9

%

Stuart, FL

 

1997

 

1995

 

86,883

 

64.4

%

978

 

Y

 

51.7

%

SW Ranches, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

64,955

 

81.8

%

648

 

N

 

85.3

%

Tampa, FL

 

2007

 

2001/2002

 

83,738

 

83.6

%

796

 

N

 

28.5

%

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1997

 

68,063

 

79.0

%

984

 

Y

 

47.2

%

24



Table of Contents

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

94,503

 

84.8

%

836

 

Y

 

73.9

%

Alpharetta, GA

 

2001

 

1996

 

90,485

 

77.5

%

665

 

Y

 

75.1

%

Austell , GA

 

2006

 

2000

 

83,625

 

70.8

%

644

 

Y

 

66.0

%

Decatur, GA

 

1998

 

1986

 

148,480

 

72.9

%

1,281

 

Y

 

2.3

%

Norcross, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

85,410

 

77.1

%

573

 

Y

 

55.8

%

Peachtree City, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

49,875

 

86.7

%

438

 

N

 

75.6

%

Smyrna, GA

 

2001

 

2000

 

56,820

 

82.1

%

488

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Snellville, GA

 

2007

 

1996/1997

 

80,000

 

85.3

%

755

 

Y

 

27.1

%

Suwanee I, GA

 

2007

 

2000/2003

 

85,240

 

68.5

%

616

 

Y

 

28.7

%

Suwanee II, GA

 

2007

 

2005

 

79,640

 

69.9

%

573

 

N

 

61.8

%

Addison, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

31,325

 

88.9

%

367

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Aurora, IL

 

2004

 

1996

 

74,435

 

75.8

%

554

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Bartlett, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

51,425

 

83.2

%

411

 

Y

 

33.5

%

Bellwood, IL

 

2001

 

1999

 

86,650

 

83.6

%

742

 

Y

 

52.1

%

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

2004

 

1978

 

74,400

 

89.1

%

637

 

N

 

0.0

%

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

64,129

 

88.0

%

626

 

Y

 

5.5

%

Glenview, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

100,115

 

95.0

%

738

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Gurnee, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

80,300

 

78.7

%

722

 

N

 

34.1

%

Hanover, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

41,178

 

76.0

%

408

 

Y

 

0.4

%

Harvey, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

60,090

 

84.2

%

575

 

Y

 

3.0

%

Joliet, IL

 

2004

 

1993

 

73,175

 

72.0

%

528

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Kildeer, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

46,275

 

89.0

%

429

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Lombard, IL

 

2004

 

1981

 

58,188

 

85.3

%

548

 

Y

 

9.8

%

Mount Prospect, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

65,000

 

88.2

%

587

 

Y

 

12.7

%

Mundelein, IL

 

2004

 

1990

 

44,700

 

79.6

%

490

 

Y

 

8.9

%

North Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1985

 

53,350

 

74.2

%

428

 

N

 

0.0

%

Plainfield I, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

53,800

 

88.7

%

401

 

N

 

3.3

%

Plainfield II, IL

 

2005

 

2000

 

51,900

 

72.3

%

353

 

N

 

22.8

%

Schaumburg, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

31,160

 

88.3

%

321

 

N

 

5.6

%

Streamwood, IL

 

2004

 

1982

 

64,305

 

73.9

%

567

 

N

 

4.4

%

Warrensville, IL

 

2005

 

1977/89

 

48,796

 

77.6

%

378

 

N

 

0.0

%

Waukegan, IL

 

2004

 

1977

 

79,500

 

79.1

%

691

 

Y

 

8.4

%

West Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

48,175

 

83.5

%

426

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westmont, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

53,700

 

90.6

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Wheeling I, IL

 

2004

 

1974

 

54,210

 

81.6

%

493

 

N

 

0.0

%

Wheeling II, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

67,825

 

68.7

%

603

 

Y

 

7.3

%

Woodridge, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

50,262

 

79.9

%

466

 

Y

 

6.7

%

Indianapolis I, IN

 

2004

 

1987

 

43,600

 

76.9

%

326

 

N

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis II, IN

 

2004

 

1997

 

44,900

 

75.9

%

454

 

Y

 

15.6

%

Indianapolis III, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

60,850

 

77.8

%

496

 

Y

 

32.8

%

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

62,105

 

68.6

%

526

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis V, IN

 

2004

 

1999

 

74,825

 

88.7

%

584

 

Y

 

33.6

%

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

73,003

 

68.7

%

717

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

2004

 

1992

 

91,777

 

71.5

%

808

 

Y

 

6.4

%

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

2004

 

1975

 

79,998

 

63.8

%

702

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

2004

 

1976

 

61,732

 

70.5

%

544

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

1997

 

1980

 

35,200

 

80.5

%

329

 

N

 

11.6

%

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

1997

 

1980/1995

 

80,277

 

80.6

%

563

 

Y

 

40.5

%

Slidell, LA

 

2001

 

1998

 

79,540

 

79.5

%

523

 

Y

 

46.6

%

Boston I, MA

 

2010

 

555

 

33,993

 

51.1

%

592

 

N

 

98.5

%

Boston II, MA

 

2002

 

2001

 

60,695

 

71.6

%

630

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Leominster, MA

 

1998

 

1987/88/00

 

53,823

 

65.3

%

500

 

Y

 

38.5

%

Medford, MA

 

2007

 

2001

 

58,815

 

67.1

%

656

 

Y

 

96.0

%

Baltimore, MD

 

2001

 

1999/00

 

93,350

 

77.2

%

809

 

Y

 

45.3

%

California, MD

 

2004

 

1998

 

77,865

 

86.7

%

723

 

Y

 

39.0

%

Gaithersburg, MD

 

2005

 

1998

 

87,045

 

85.8

%

784

 

Y

 

42.0

%

Laurel, MD †

 

2001

 

1978/99/00

 

162,792

 

73.8

%

1,020

 

N

 

41.1

%

Temple Hills, MD

 

2001

 

2000

 

97,200

 

83.4

%

826

 

Y

 

68.8

%

Grand Rapids, MI

 

1996

 

1976

 

87,381

 

66.3

%

525

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Portage, MI (6)

 

1996

 

1980

 

50,280

 

92.6

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Romulus, MI

 

1997

 

1997

 

42,050

 

73.8

%

339

 

Y

 

7.4

%

Wyoming, MI

 

1996

 

1987

 

91,158

 

67.2

%

635

 

N

 

0.0

%

Gulfport, MS

 

1997

 

1977/93

 

61,251

 

80.9

%

507

 

Y

 

33.5

%

Belmont, NC

 

2001

 

1996/97/98

 

81,448

 

71.7

%

581

 

N

 

24.2

%

Burlington I, NC

 

2001

 

1990/91/93/94/98

 

109,346

 

61.5

%

947

 

N

 

4.7

%

Burlington II, NC

 

2001

 

1991

 

42,205

 

69.3

%

394

 

Y

 

12.0

%

Cary, NC

 

2001

 

1993/94/97

 

112,324

 

75.2

%

793

 

N

 

7.3

%

Charlotte, NC

 

1999

 

1999

 

69,000

 

86.0

%

736

 

Y

 

52.8

%

Raleigh, NC

 

1998

 

1994/95

 

48,675

 

90.4

%

408

 

N

 

8.2

%

Brick, NJ

 

1994

 

1981

 

51,725

 

71.1

%

431

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cherry Hill, NJ

 

2010

 

2004

 

52,600

 

51.5

%

374

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Clifton, NJ

 

2005

 

2001

 

105,550

 

78.1

%

1,018

 

Y

 

85.5

%

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Chandler I, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

47,520

 

83.6%

 

436

 

Y

 

11.4%

 

Chandler II, AZ

 

2013

 

2008

 

83,859

 

58.3%

 

1,188

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

2013

 

2010

 

57,430

 

86.2%

 

454

 

N

 

84.0%

 

Glendale, AZ

 

1998

 

1987

 

56,807

 

87.5%

 

515

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Green Valley, AZ

 

2005

 

1985

 

25,200

 

82.5%

 

257

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Mesa I, AZ

 

2006

 

1985

 

52,375

 

91.6%

 

484

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Mesa II, AZ

 

2006

 

1981

 

45,461

 

83.3%

 

392

 

Y

 

5.1%

 

Mesa III, AZ

 

2006

 

1986

 

58,264

 

88.0%

 

497

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Phoenix I, AZ

 

2006

 

1987

 

100,775

 

83.4%

 

746

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Phoenix II, AZ

 

2006

 

1974

 

83,415

 

88.7%

 

808

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1998

 

1995

 

79,825

 

86.9%

 

655

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tempe I, AZ

 

2005

 

1975

 

53,890

 

86.5%

 

405

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tempe II, AZ

 

2013

 

2007

 

35,125

 

87.0%

 

430

 

N

 

71.5%

 

Tucson I, AZ

 

1998

 

1974

 

59,500

 

82.9%

 

480

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tucson II, AZ

 

1998

 

1988

 

43,850

 

87.7%

 

534

 

Y

 

100.0%

 

Tucson III, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

49,832

 

86.4%

 

483

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Tucson IV, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

48,040

 

86.4%

 

486

 

Y

 

13.5%

 

Tucson V, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

45,134

 

79.8%

 

418

 

Y

 

11.7%

 

Tucson VI, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

40,814

 

85.3%

 

406

 

Y

 

13.2%

 

Tucson VII, AZ

 

2005

 

1982

 

52,638

 

87.8%

 

591

 

Y

 

6.9%

 

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1979

 

46,550

 

83.5%

 

439

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tucson IX, AZ

 

2005

 

1984

 

67,545

 

85.9%

 

599

 

Y

 

6.2%

 

Tucson X, AZ

 

2005

 

1981

 

46,250

 

85.2%

 

412

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Tucson XI, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,700

 

85.5%

 

409

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tucson XII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

42,225

 

85.2%

 

425

 

Y

 

4.0%

 

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

2005

 

1974

 

45,800

 

82.8%

 

496

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

2005

 

1976

 

49,095

 

90.3%

 

553

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Benicia, CA

 

2005

 

1988/93/2005

 

74,770

 

91.2%

 

731

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Citrus Heights, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

75,620

 

86.8%

 

677

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Diamond Bar, CA

 

2005

 

1988

 

102,984

 

90.8%

 

901

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Escondido, CA

 

2007

 

2002

 

142,645

 

91.0%

 

1,221

 

Y

 

11.6%

 

Fallbrook, CA

 

1997

 

1985/88

 

46,420

 

87.3%

 

445

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Lancaster, CA

 

2001

 

1987

 

60,675

 

91.4%

 

337

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Long Beach, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

125,121

 

88.1%

 

1,351

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Murrieta, CA

 

2005

 

1996

 

49,855

 

80.9%

 

427

 

Y

 

4.9%

 

North Highlands, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

57,094

 

84.9%

 

469

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Orangevale, CA

 

2005

 

1980

 

50,392

 

90.8%

 

525

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Pleasanton, CA

 

2005

 

2003

 

85,045

 

86.1%

 

693

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

 

25



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Cranford, NJ

 

1994

 

1987

 

91,250

 

72.6

%

852

 

Y

 

7.9

%

East Hanover, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

107,579

 

64.4

%

970

 

N

 

1.6

%

Egg Harbor I, NJ

 

2010

 

2005

 

39,425

 

37.3

%

284

 

N

 

11.5

%

Egg Harbor II, NJ

 

2010

 

2002

 

71,175

 

37.5

%

706

 

N

 

16.4

%

Elizabeth, NJ

 

2005

 

1925/97

 

38,830

 

77.3

%

673

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fairview, NJ

 

1997

 

1989

 

27,925

 

68.5

%

449

 

N

 

100.0

%

Hamilton, NJ

 

2006

 

1990

 

70,550

 

60.5

%

610

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Hoboken, NJ

 

2005

 

1945/97

 

34,180

 

80.3

%

742

 

N

 

100.0

%

Linden, NJ

 

1994

 

1983

 

100,325

 

62.9

%

1,117

 

N

 

2.8

%

Morris Township, NJ (5)

 

1997

 

1972

 

71,776

 

72.4

%

565

 

Y

 

1.3

%

Parsippany, NJ

 

1997

 

1981

 

66,325

 

84.2

%

566

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Randolph, NJ

 

2002

 

1998/99

 

52,565

 

75.7

%

546

 

Y

 

82.5

%

Sewell, NJ

 

2001

 

1984/98

 

57,830

 

83.5

%

463

 

N

 

5.3

%

Albuquerque I, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

65,927

 

83.3

%

610

 

Y

 

3.2

%

Albuquerque II, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

58,598

 

83.1

%

514

 

Y

 

4.1

%

Albuquerque III, NM

 

2005

 

1986

 

57,536

 

87.3

%

503

 

Y

 

4.7

%

Carlsbad, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

39,999

 

95.2

%

341

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Deming, NM

 

2005

 

1973/83

 

33,005

 

83.5

%

232

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Cruces, NM

 

2005

 

1984

 

65,740

 

69.2

%

532

 

Y

 

2.1

%

Lovington, NM

 

2005

 

1975

 

15,550

 

85.5

%

250

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Silver City, NM

 

2005

 

1972

 

26,975

 

86.2

%

252

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

2005

 

1977/99/00

 

24,010

 

74.2

%

174

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Las Vegas I, NV †

 

2006

 

1986

 

47,882

 

79.8

%

375

 

Y

 

5.6

%

Las Vegas II, NV

 

2006

 

1997

 

48,850

 

89.9

%

518

 

Y

 

75.2

%

Jamaica, NY

 

2001

 

2000

 

88,415

 

74.6

%

919

 

Y

 

30.7

%

Bronx, NY

 

2010

 

1931/2004

 

66,865

 

74.7

%

1,333

 

N

 

100.0

%

Brooklyn, NY

 

2010

 

1917/2004

 

56,970

 

76.6

%

861

 

N

 

100.0

%

Queens, NY

 

2010

 

1962/2003

 

61,090

 

65.9

%

1,143

 

N

 

25.2

%

Wyckoff, NY

 

2010

 

1910/2007

 

62,245

 

81.3

%

1,039

 

N

 

90.2

%

New Rochelle, NY

 

2005

 

1998

 

48,431

 

80.1

%

399

 

N

 

15.0

%

North Babylon, NY

 

1998

 

1988/99

 

78,188

 

79.5

%

650

 

N

 

9.0

%

Riverhead, NY

 

2005

 

1985/86/99

 

38,240

 

71.2

%

326

 

N

 

0.0

%

Southold, NY

 

2005

 

1989

 

58,795

 

70.5

%

599

 

N

 

3.0

%

Boardman, OH

 

1980

 

1980/89

 

65,495

 

74.9

%

515

 

Y

 

24.0

%

Canton I, OH

 

2005

 

1979/87

 

39,750

 

73.2

%

407

 

N

 

0.0

%

Canton II, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

26,200

 

88.9

%

192

 

N

 

0.0

%

Centerville I, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

80,690

 

68.2

%

619

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Centerville II, OH

 

2004

 

1976

 

43,150

 

63.9

%

304

 

N

 

0.0

%

Cleveland I, OH

 

2005

 

1997/99

 

46,000

 

87.6

%

338

 

Y

 

4.9

%

Cleveland II, OH

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,425

 

53.2

%

568

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Columbus, OH

 

2006

 

1999

 

72,155

 

73.1

%

607

 

Y

 

26.1

%

Dayton I, OH

 

2004

 

1978

 

43,100

 

64.3

%

341

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dayton II, OH

 

2005

 

1989/00

 

48,149

 

80.0

%

391

 

Y

 

1.7

%

Euclid I, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

46,710

 

71.6

%

423

 

N

 

22.3

%

Euclid II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,275

 

59.5

%

376

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Grove City, OH

 

2006

 

1997

 

89,290

 

75.1

%

772

 

Y

 

16.9

%

Hilliard, OH

 

2006

 

1995

 

89,690

 

71.9

%

780

 

Y

 

24.5

%

Lakewood, OH

 

1989*

 

1989

 

39,337

 

81.2

%

456

 

Y

 

24.6

%

Louisville, OH

 

2005

 

1988/90

 

53,900

 

74.5

%

387

 

N

 

0.0

%

Marblehead, OH

 

2005

 

1988/98

 

52,300

 

78.8

%

378

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mason, OH

 

1998

 

1981

 

33,900

 

79.3

%

279

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Mentor, OH

 

2005

 

1983/99

 

51,225

 

90.4

%

366

 

N

 

16.1

%

Miamisburg, OH

 

2004

 

1975

 

59,930

 

66.4

%

430

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980

 

93,025

 

88.5

%

669

 

Y

 

3.8

%

North Canton I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

45,200

 

78.7

%

318

 

Y

 

0.0

%

North Canton II, OH

 

1983*

 

1983

 

44,140

 

80.0

%

346

 

Y

 

15.8

%

North Olmsted I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

48,665

 

76.6

%

440

 

Y

 

7.0

%

North Olmsted II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,850

 

75.6

%

397

 

Y

 

14.2

%

North Randall, OH

 

1998*

 

1998/02

 

80,099

 

84.9

%

799

 

N

 

90.8

%

Perry, OH

 

2005

 

1992/97

 

63,700

 

75.7

%

420

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

2006

 

1979

 

66,895

 

71.9

%

664

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Strongsville, OH

 

2007

 

1978

 

43,727

 

85.0

%

399

 

Y

 

100.0

%

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980/82/98

 

90,281

 

80.6

%

713

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Westlake, OH

 

2005

 

2001

 

62,750

 

86.9

%

453

 

Y

 

6.1

%

Willoughby, OH

 

2005

 

1997

 

34,064

 

70.4

%

266

 

Y

 

10.1

%

Youngstown, OH

 

1977*

 

1977

 

65,950

 

72.6

%

523

 

Y

 

1.2

%

Levittown, PA

 

2001

 

2000

 

76,180

 

79.6

%

654

 

Y

 

36.3

%

Philadelphia, PA

 

2001

 

1999

 

97,639

 

86.0

%

961

 

N

 

47.1

%

Alcoa, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

42,325

 

83.9

%

355

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Antioch, TN

 

2005

 

1985/98

 

76,160

 

83.3

%

618

 

Y

 

8.5

%

Cordova I, TN

 

2005

 

1987

 

54,125

 

72.5

%

386

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

53,978

 

82.4%

 

455

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Rialto I, CA

 

2006

 

1987

 

57,391

 

85.8%

 

437

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Rialto II, CA

 

1997

 

1980

 

99,783

 

85.0%

 

714

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Riverside I, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

67,120

 

86.2%

 

639

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Riverside II, CA

 

2006

 

1985

 

85,426

 

91.0%

 

810

 

Y

 

5.5%

 

Roseville, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

59,869

 

86.6%

 

543

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Sacramento I, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

50,714

 

86.6%

 

548

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Sacramento II, CA

 

2005

 

1986

 

61,888

 

88.8%

 

550

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

San Bernardino I, CA

 

1997

 

1987

 

31,070

 

81.2%

 

236

 

N

 

0.0%

 

San Bernardino II, CA

 

1997

 

1991

 

41,546

 

84.4%

 

373

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

San Bernardino III, CA

 

1997

 

1985/92

 

35,416

 

83.1%

 

371

 

N

 

0.0%

 

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

83,057

 

85.6%

 

679

 

Y

 

12.5%

 

San Bernardino V, CA

 

2006

 

1974

 

57,595

 

90.5%

 

468

 

Y

 

7.0%

 

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

2006

 

1978

 

78,729

 

93.5%

 

604

 

Y

 

2.1%

 

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

2006

 

1977

 

95,604

 

80.5%

 

812

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

San Marcos, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

37,430

 

92.1%

 

242

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Santa Ana, CA

 

2006

 

1984

 

63,816

 

89.2%

 

714

 

Y

 

3.9%

 

South Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1979

 

52,565

 

82.3%

 

415

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Spring Valley, CA

 

2006

 

1980

 

55,045

 

88.4%

 

713

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Temecula I, CA

 

1998

 

1985/2003

 

81,310

 

87.8%

 

691

 

Y

 

45.5%

 

Temecula II, CA

 

2007

 

2003

 

84,318

 

86.7%

 

634

 

Y

 

54.4%

 

Vista I, CA

 

2001

 

1988

 

74,405

 

94.0%

 

622

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Vista II, CA

 

2005

 

2001/02/03

 

147,941

 

91.8%

 

1,276

 

Y

 

3.8%

 

Walnut, CA

 

2005

 

1987

 

50,708

 

90.3%

 

537

 

Y

 

15.8%

 

West Sacramento, CA

 

2005

 

1984

 

40,015

 

93.7%

 

478

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Westminster, CA

 

2005

 

1983/98

 

68,428

 

91.9%

 

559

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Aurora, CO

 

2005

 

1981

 

75,867

 

89.3%

 

617

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

2005

 

1986

 

47,975

 

82.1%

 

462

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

2006

 

2001

 

62,400

 

78.8%

 

433

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Denver I, CO

 

2006

 

1997

 

59,200

 

89.7%

 

449

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Denver II, CO

 

2012

 

2007

 

74,435

 

92.3%

 

675

 

N

 

94.8%

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

54,770

 

87.7%

 

544

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Golden, CO

 

2005

 

1985

 

87,800

 

87.0%

 

641

 

Y

 

1.6%

 

Littleton, CO

 

2005

 

1987

 

53,490

 

88.3%

 

442

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Northglenn, CO

 

2005

 

1980

 

52,102

 

86.9%

 

497

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Bloomfield, CT

 

1997

 

1987/93/94

 

48,700

 

87.3%

 

440

 

Y

 

8.6%

 

Branford, CT

 

1995

 

1986

 

50,679

 

86.3%

 

434

 

Y

 

3.4%

 

Bristol, CT

 

2005

 

1989/99

 

47,725

 

84.5%

 

452

 

N

 

29.7%

 

East Windsor, CT

 

2005

 

1986/89

 

46,016

 

93.6%

 

300

 

N

 

0.3%

 

 

26



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Cordova II, TN

 

2006

 

1995

 

67,700

 

83.3

%

715

 

Y

 

7.1

%

Knoxville I, TN

 

1997

 

1984

 

29,337

 

87.1

%

283

 

Y

 

6.8

%

Knoxville II, TN

 

1997

 

1985

 

38,000

 

75.0

%

328

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville III, TN

 

1998

 

1991

 

45,736

 

73.2

%

443

 

Y

 

6.9

%

Knoxville IV, TN

 

1998

 

1983

 

58,752

 

64.6

%

438

 

N

 

1.1

%

Knoxville V, TN

 

1998

 

1977

 

42,790

 

70.0

%

370

 

N

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VI, TN

 

2005

 

1975

 

63,440

 

71.9

%

586

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VII, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

55,094

 

67.2

%

442

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

2005

 

1978

 

95,868

 

65.6

%

761

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis I, TN

 

2001

 

1999

 

92,320

 

88.3

%

695

 

N

 

57.1

%

Memphis II, TN

 

2001

 

2000

 

71,710

 

80.2

%

556

 

N

 

46.3

%

Memphis III, TN

 

2005

 

1983

 

40,807

 

79.8

%

347

 

Y

 

6.4

%

Memphis IV, TN

 

2005

 

1986

 

38,750

 

81.5

%

322

 

Y

 

4.3

%

Memphis V, TN

 

2005

 

1981

 

60,120

 

84.7

%

498

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VI, TN

 

2006

 

1985/93

 

108,771

 

85.1

%

874

 

Y

 

3.3

%

Memphis VII, TN

 

2006

 

1980/85

 

115,253

 

68.3

%

578

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Memphis VIII, TN †

 

2006

 

1990

 

96,060

 

72.6

%

553

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville I, TN

 

2005

 

1984

 

103,310

 

80.7

%

693

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Nashville II, TN

 

2005

 

1986/00

 

83,584

 

82.7

%

633

 

Y

 

6.6

%

Nashville III, TN

 

2006

 

1985

 

101,475

 

72.8

%

620

 

Y

 

5.2

%

Nashville IV, TN

 

2006

 

1986/00

 

102,450

 

89.8

%

727

 

Y

 

7.0

%

Austin I, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

59,520

 

81.0

%

536

 

Y

 

58.8

%

Austin II, TX

 

2006

 

2000/03

 

65,241

 

88.3

%

594

 

Y

 

38.9

%

Austin III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

70,560

 

80.8

%

579

 

Y

 

85.4

%

Baytown, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

38,950

 

77.4

%

360

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Bryan, TX

 

2005

 

1994

 

60,450

 

68.1

%

495

 

Y

 

0.0

%

College Station, TX

 

2005

 

1993

 

26,550

 

69.8

%

346

 

N

 

0.0

%

Dallas, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,382

 

86.7

%

536

 

Y

 

28.5

%

Denton, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

60,836

 

83.5

%

462

 

Y

 

3.9

%

El Paso I, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

59,652

 

82.4

%

519

 

Y

 

0.9

%

El Paso II, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

48,704

 

92.5

%

413

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso III, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

71,276

 

76.2

%

595

 

Y

 

2.0

%

El Paso IV, TX

 

2005

 

1983

 

67,058

 

81.9

%

523

 

Y

 

3.2

%

El Paso V, TX

 

2005

 

1982

 

62,300

 

74.4

%

398

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VI, TX

 

2005

 

1985

 

36,570

 

91.6

%

258

 

Y

 

0.0

%

El Paso VII, TX †

 

2005

 

1982

 

34,545

 

82.1

%

13

 

N

 

0.0

%

Fort Worth I, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

50,621

 

76.4

%

406

 

Y

 

26.6

%

Fort Worth II, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

72,925

 

83.5

%

655

 

Y

 

49.0

%

Frisco I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

50,854

 

84.0

%

431

 

Y

 

17.5

%

Frisco II, TX

 

2005

 

1998/02

 

71,299

 

83.5

%

511

 

Y

 

23.8

%

Frisco III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

75,215

 

74.9

%

610

 

Y

 

88.0

%

Frisco IV, TX

 

2010

 

2007

 

74,835

 

73.7

%

511

 

Y

 

16.4

%

Garland I, TX

 

2006

 

1991

 

70,100

 

79.8

%

652

 

Y

 

4.4

%

Garland II, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

68,425

 

79.1

%

470

 

Y

 

39.6

%

Greenville I, TX

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

59,385

 

73.4

%

451

 

Y

 

28.8

%

Greenville II, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

44,900

 

63.7

%

312

 

N

 

36.3

%

Houston I, TX

 

2005

 

1981

 

100,630

 

79.8

%

626

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston II, TX

 

2005

 

1977

 

71,300

 

79.0

%

391

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Houston III, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

61,120

 

70.4

%

462

 

Y

 

4.3

%

Houston IV, TX

 

2005

 

1987

 

43,975

 

70.9

%

383

 

Y

 

6.1

%

Houston V, TX †

 

2006

 

1980/1997

 

125,930

 

85.6

%

1,011

 

Y

 

55.1

%

Keller, TX

 

2006

 

2000

 

61,885

 

79.5

%

486

 

Y

 

21.1

%

La Porte, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

44,850

 

81.0

%

429

 

Y

 

18.6

%

Lewisville, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

58,140

 

62.7

%

429

 

Y

 

20.2

%

Mansfield, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

63,075

 

81.3

%

495

 

Y

 

38.4

%

McKinney I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

47,040

 

89.4

%

363

 

Y

 

9.0

%

McKinney II, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

70,050

 

80.2

%

539

 

Y

 

46.3

%

North Richland Hills, TX

 

2005

 

2002

 

57,175

 

82.8

%

432

 

Y

 

47.6

%

Roanoke, TX

 

2005

 

1996/01

 

59,300

 

83.7

%

448

 

Y

 

30.0

%

San Antonio I, TX

 

2005

 

2005

 

73,330

 

84.2

%

573

 

Y

 

79.0

%

San Antonio II, TX

 

2006

 

2005

 

73,230

 

89.2

%

670

 

N

 

82.3

%

San Antonio III, TX

 

2007

 

2006

 

72,075

 

85.6

%

566

 

N

 

87.0

%

Sherman I, TX

 

2005

 

1998

 

54,975

 

77.3

%

506

 

Y

 

21.1

%

Sherman II, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

48,425

 

78.3

%

391

 

Y

 

30.9

%

Spring, TX

 

2006

 

1980/86

 

72,751

 

74.6

%

538

 

N

 

14.1

%

Murray I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

60,180

 

69.9

%

647

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Murray II, UT †

 

2005

 

1978

 

71,221

 

85.6

%

371

 

Y

 

2.6

%

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

56,446

 

70.2

%

732

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

2005

 

1978

 

53,676

 

62.8

%

503

 

Y

 

0.0

%

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

69,475

 

67.4

%

601

 

N

 

21.4

%

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

2005

 

1998/01

 

61,257

 

65.9

%

558

 

N

 

100.0

%

McLearen, VA

 

2010

 

2002

 

69,490

 

79.0

%

719

 

Y

 

91.2

%

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Enfield, CT

 

2001

 

1989

 

52,875

 

91.9%

 

369

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Gales Ferry, CT

 

1995

 

1987/89

 

54,230

 

86.4%

 

601

 

N

 

9.1%

 

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

2002

 

1999/2000/01

 

47,025

 

90.9%

 

447

 

N

 

42.5%

 

Manchester II, CT

 

2005

 

1984

 

52,725

 

91.9%

 

399

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Milford, CT

 

1996

 

1975

 

44,885

 

89.9%

 

375

 

Y

 

6.9%

 

Monroe, CT

 

2005

 

1996/2003

 

58,500

 

86.6%

 

392

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Mystic, CT

 

1996

 

1975/86

 

50,825

 

90.0%

 

560

 

Y

 

4.4%

 

Newington I, CT

 

2005

 

1978/97

 

42,620

 

86.8%

 

248

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Newington II, CT

 

2005

 

1979/81

 

36,140

 

88.8%

 

194

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Norwalk, CT

 

2012

 

2009

 

30,242

 

90.9%

 

347

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

2005

 

1982/88/2000

 

86,950

 

89.7%

 

720

 

N

 

10.8%

 

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

2005

 

1988/2002

 

26,425

 

91.6%

 

252

 

N

 

71.3%

 

Shelton, CT

 

2011

 

2007

 

78,430

 

83.4%

 

856

 

Y

 

93.9%

 

South Windsor, CT

 

1996

 

1976

 

72,075

 

86.0%

 

546

 

Y

 

2.9%

 

Stamford, CT

 

2005

 

1997

 

28,907

 

91.0%

 

363

 

N

 

38.6%

 

Wilton, CT

 

2012

 

1966

 

84,515

 

90.0%

 

770

 

Y

 

67.0%

 

Washington I, DC

 

2008

 

2002

 

63,085

 

86.5%

 

755

 

Y

 

97.1%

 

Washington II, DC

 

2011

 

1929/98

 

83,192

 

87.2%

 

1,046

 

N

 

99.5%

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

2001

 

1998

 

37,958

 

93.5%

 

605

 

N

 

70.2%

 

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

61,749

 

91.2%

 

756

 

Y

 

61.7%

 

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

2005

 

2001

 

61,629

 

90.5%

 

578

 

Y

 

88.6%

 

Bradenton I, FL

 

2004

 

1979

 

68,441

 

91.9%

 

581

 

N

 

7.2%

 

Bradenton II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

87,988

 

89.4%

 

832

 

Y

 

44.9%

 

Cape Coral, FL

 

2000*

 

2000

 

76,627

 

90.6%

 

852

 

Y

 

90.6%

 

Coconut Creek, FL

 

2012

 

2001

 

78,783

 

94.8%

 

757

 

N

 

53.0%

 

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

2004

 

1984

 

168,274

 

91.1%

 

1,811

 

N

 

26.4%

 

Dania, FL

 

1996

 

1988

 

58,145

 

93.3%

 

493

 

Y

 

53.7%

 

Davie, FL

 

2001*

 

2001

 

80,985

 

93.1%

 

833

 

Y

 

68.3%

 

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

1998*

 

1998

 

57,230

 

94.3%

 

517

 

Y

 

54.9%

 

Delray Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1999

 

67,813

 

88.8%

 

816

 

Y

 

45.5%

 

Delray Beach II, FL

 

2013

 

1987

 

75,834

 

88.6%

 

1,180

 

N

 

95.3%

 

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

1996

 

1986

 

113,091

 

89.8%

 

803

 

Y

 

42.1%

 

Ft. Lauderdale I, FL

 

1999

 

1999

 

70,063

 

96.0%

 

696

 

Y

 

54.6%

 

Ft. Lauderdale II, FL

 

2013

 

2007

 

46,096

 

62.8%

 

820

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Ft. Myers, FL

 

1999

 

1998

 

67,562

 

90.1%

 

591

 

Y

 

84.3%

 

Jacksonville I, FL

 

2005

 

2005

 

80,215

 

93.6%

 

706

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Jacksonville II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

65,045

 

88.3%

 

659

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Jacksonville III, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

65,590

 

84.5%

 

675

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

2007

 

2006

 

77,535

 

91.9%

 

705

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Jacksonville V, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

82,235

 

85.8%

 

700

 

N

 

80.2%

 

Lake Worth, FL †

 

1998

 

1998/2002

 

161,934

 

94.3%

 

1,355

 

Y

 

74.1%

 

Lakeland, FL

 

1994

 

1988

 

49,079

 

88.4%

 

488

 

Y

 

83.1%

 

Kendall, FL

 

2007

 

2003

 

75,495

 

98.4%

 

703

 

N

 

79.4%

 

Leisure City, FL

 

2012

 

2005

 

56,042

 

89.5%

 

611

 

N

 

69.7%

 

Lutz I, FL

 

2004

 

2000

 

66,795

 

91.3%

 

582

 

Y

 

43.5%

 

Lutz II, FL

 

2004

 

1999

 

69,232

 

90.2%

 

530

 

Y

 

29.7%

 

 

27



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Year Acquired/

 

Year

 

Rentable

 

 

 

 

 

Manager

 

% Climate

 

Facility Location

 

Developed (1)

 

Built

 

Square Feet

 

Occupancy (2)

 

Units

 

Apartment (3)

 

Controlled (4)

 

Mannasas, VA

 

2010

 

1998

 

73,045

 

76.0

%

639

 

Y

 

51.1

%

Milwaukee, WI

 

2004

 

1988

 

58,500

 

76.2

%

485

 

Y

 

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total/Weighted Average (363 Facilities)

 

 

 

 

 

23,634,618

 

76.3

%

206,322

 

 

 

 

 

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Margate I, FL †

 

1996

 

1979/81

 

54,385

 

88.5%

 

338

 

N

 

20.8%

 

Margate II, FL †

 

1996

 

1985

 

65,180

 

83.8%

 

425

 

Y

 

60.1%

 

Merritt Island, FL

 

2002

 

2000

 

50,291

 

92.1%

 

465

 

Y

 

66.4%

 

Miami I, FL

 

1996

 

1995

 

46,275

 

95.4%

 

555

 

Y

 

68.8%

 

Miami II, FL

 

1996

 

1989

 

67,010

 

89.6%

 

570

 

Y

 

18.5%

 

Miami III, FL

 

2005

 

1988/2003

 

150,735

 

93.7%

 

1,519

 

N

 

91.1%

 

Miami IV, FL

 

2011

 

2007

 

76,337

 

97.3%

 

928

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Miramar, FL

 

2013

 

2009

 

75,655

 

91.1%

 

744

 

N

 

97.1%

 

Naples I, FL

 

1996

 

1996

 

48,150

 

93.0%

 

318

 

Y

 

45.9%

 

Naples II, FL

 

1997

 

1985

 

65,850

 

88.1%

 

625

 

Y

 

56.2%

 

Naples III, FL

 

1997

 

1981/83

 

79,960

 

94.0%

 

784

 

Y

 

49.5%

 

Naples IV, FL

 

1998

 

1990

 

40,575

 

93.8%

 

431

 

N

 

64.0%

 

Ocoee, FL

 

2005

 

1997

 

76,050

 

92.9%

 

618

 

Y

 

21.8%

 

Orange City, FL

 

2004

 

2001

 

59,580

 

90.4%

 

644

 

N

 

52.6%

 

Orlando II, FL

 

2005

 

2002/04

 

63,084

 

88.5%

 

579

 

N

 

81.6%

 

Orlando III, FL

 

2006

 

1988/90/96

 

101,330

 

87.5%

 

825

 

Y

 

22.0%

 

Orlando IV, FL

 

2010

 

2009

 

76,565

 

88.8%

 

636

 

N

 

68.7%

 

Orlando V, FL

 

2012

 

2008

 

75,358

 

87.8%

 

637

 

N

 

90.8%

 

Oviedo, FL

 

2006

 

1988/91

 

49,276

 

92.4%

 

427

 

Y

 

3.7%

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1997

 

1997

 

67,321

 

96.8%

 

694

 

Y

 

77.9%

 

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

81,405

 

90.3%

 

759

 

N

 

90.0%

 

Sanford, FL

 

2006

 

1988/2006

 

61,810

 

93.1%

 

437

 

Y

 

35.3%

 

Sarasota, FL

 

1999

 

1998

 

71,152

 

91.9%

 

528

 

Y

 

60.0%

 

St. Augustine, FL

 

1996

 

1985

 

59,725

 

89.9%

 

698

 

Y

 

26.3%

 

Stuart, FL

 

1997

 

1995

 

87,240

 

90.4%

 

949

 

Y

 

62.8%

 

SW Ranches, FL

 

2007

 

2004

 

64,955

 

93.3%

 

647

 

N

 

88.8%

 

Tampa, FL

 

2007

 

2001/02

 

83,838

 

88.3%

 

787

 

N

 

34.1%

 

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

2001

 

1997

 

68,061

 

90.1%

 

972

 

Y

 

52.4%

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

2004

 

1996

 

94,503

 

93.6%

 

834

 

Y

 

76.6%

 

West Palm Beach III, FL

 

2012

 

2008

 

77,851

 

91.6%

 

880

 

Y

 

89.8%

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

2001

 

1996

 

90,501

 

87.6%

 

662

 

Y

 

80.3%

 

Atlanta, GA

 

2012

 

2008

 

66,675

 

81.0%

 

623

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Austell, GA

 

2006

 

2000

 

83,625

 

89.6%

 

657

 

Y

 

64.3%

 

Decatur, GA

 

1998

 

1986

 

145,280

 

89.1%

 

1,239

 

Y

 

2.5%

 

Duluth, GA

 

2011

 

2009

 

70,885

 

89.2%

 

586

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

2011

 

1999

 

73,765

 

88.9%

 

599

 

Y

 

27.6%

 

Norcross I, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

85,420

 

90.1%

 

586

 

Y

 

66.0%

 

Norcross II, GA

 

2011

 

1996

 

52,295

 

95.6%

 

396

 

Y

 

61.8%

 

Norcross III, GA

 

2012

 

2007

 

47,270

 

94.8%

 

492

 

Y

 

100.0%

 

Norcross IV, GA

 

2012

 

2005

 

57,505

 

84.2%

 

504

 

Y

 

88.7%

 

Peachtree City I, GA

 

2001

 

1997

 

49,875

 

87.0%

 

443

 

N

 

75.5%

 

Peachtree City II, GA

 

2012

 

2005

 

60,250

 

91.1%

 

430

 

N

 

43.1%

 

Smyrna, GA

 

2001

 

2000

 

57,015

 

89.5%

 

489

 

Y

 

99.2%

 

28



Table of Contents

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Snellville, GA

 

2007

 

1996/97

 

80,000

 

92.3%

 

752

 

Y

 

21.9%

 

Suwanee I, GA

 

2007

 

2000/03

 

84,860

 

83.8%

 

664

 

Y

 

27.6%

 

Suwanee II, GA

 

2007

 

2005

 

79,590

 

89.2%

 

573

 

N

 

65.7%

 

Addison, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

31,325

 

85.6%

 

367

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Aurora, IL

 

2004

 

1996

 

73,985

 

90.1%

 

557

 

Y

 

8.6%

 

Bartlett, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

51,425

 

90.8%

 

405

 

Y

 

32.4%

 

Hanover, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

41,190

 

88.3%

 

414

 

Y

 

2.2%

 

Bellwood, IL

 

2001

 

1999

 

86,650

 

86.2%

 

739

 

Y

 

50.7%

 

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

2004

 

1978

 

71,520

 

89.8%

��

605

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

64,129

 

87.0%

 

620

 

Y

 

7.2%

 

Evanston, IL

 

2013

 

2009

 

58,050

 

95.4%

 

593

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Glenview, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

100,115

 

90.0%

 

738

 

Y

 

100.0%

 

Gurnee, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

80,300

 

94.9%

 

707

 

Y

 

37.0%

 

Harvey, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

60,090

 

86.1%

 

575

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Joliet, IL

 

2004

 

1993

 

72,865

 

91.4%

 

533

 

Y

 

24.7%

 

Kildeer, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

46,485

 

88.1%

 

420

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Lombard, IL

 

2004

 

1981

 

57,739

 

88.7%

 

534

 

Y

 

4.5%

 

Mount Prospect, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

64,750

 

91.7%

 

582

 

Y

 

10.3%

 

Mundelein, IL

 

2004

 

1990

 

44,700

 

92.7%

 

487

 

Y

 

12.3%

 

North Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1985

 

53,400

 

90.5%

 

423

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Plainfield I, IL

 

2004

 

1998

 

53,900

 

90.2%

 

405

 

N

 

8.8%

 

Plainfield II, IL

 

2005

 

2000

 

51,900

 

92.8%

 

355

 

N

 

32.5%

 

Schaumburg, IL

 

2004

 

1988

 

31,160

 

86.6%

 

319

 

N

 

5.3%

 

Streamwood, IL

 

2004

 

1982

 

64,305

 

90.5%

 

557

 

N

 

7.5%

 

Warrenville, IL

 

2005

 

1977/89

 

48,796

 

90.2%

 

377

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Waukegan, IL

 

2004

 

1977

 

79,500

 

89.8%

 

673

 

Y

 

8.0%

 

West Chicago, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

48,175

 

89.3%

 

432

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Westmont, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

53,450

 

93.0%

 

376

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Wheeling I, IL

 

2004

 

1974

 

54,210

 

90.1%

 

491

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Wheeling II, IL

 

2004

 

1979

 

67,825

 

91.9%

 

601

 

Y

 

9.8%

 

Woodridge, IL

 

2004

 

1987

 

50,241

 

92.2%

 

461

 

Y

 

17.3%

 

Boston I, MA

 

2010

 

1950

 

33,286

 

78.2%

 

584

 

N

 

30.7%

 

Boston II, MA

 

2002

 

2001

 

60,420

 

85.7%

 

626

 

Y

 

98.7%

 

Leominster, MA

 

1998

 

1987/88/2000

 

54,023

 

87.7%

 

503

 

Y

 

50.5%

 

Medford, MA

 

2007

 

2001

 

58,725

 

83.6%

 

656

 

Y

 

97.1%

 

Stoneham, MA

 

2013

 

2009/11

 

62,100

 

65.5%

 

599

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Baltimore, MD

 

2001

 

1999/2000

 

93,550

 

88.2%

 

807

 

Y

 

48.5%

 

Beltsville, MD

 

2013

 

2006

 

63,707

 

85.5%

 

649

 

N

 

9.7%

 

California, MD

 

2004

 

1998

 

77,840

 

88.1%

 

721

 

Y

 

41.1%

 

Clinton, MD

 

2013

 

2008/10

 

84,025

 

85.7%

 

903

 

N

 

50.9%

 

District Heights, MD

 

2011

 

2007

 

78,720

 

87.0%

 

955

 

Y

 

96.1%

 

Elkridge, MD

 

2013

 

1999

 

63,675

 

71.5%

 

606

 

N

 

91.3%

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

2005

 

1998

 

87,045

 

90.4%

 

785

 

Y

 

45.4%

 

Hyattsville, MD

 

2013

 

2006

 

52,665

 

78.9%

 

602

 

N

 

9.3%

 

Laurel, MD †

 

2001

 

1978/99/2000

 

162,796

 

92.2%

 

1,024

 

N

 

64.0%

 

Temple Hills, MD

 

2001

 

2000

 

97,250

 

88.3%

 

827

 

Y

 

70.6%

 

Upper Marlboro, MD

 

2013

 

2006

 

62,290

 

83.3%

 

655

 

N

 

5.5%

 

29



Table of Contents

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Belmont, NC

 

2001

 

1996/97/98

 

81,850

 

88.5%

 

593

 

N

 

21.5%

 

Burlington I, NC

 

2001

 

1990/91/93/94/98

 

109,396

 

86.8%

 

952

 

N

 

8.4%

 

Burlington II, NC

 

2001

 

1991

 

42,205

 

86.1%

 

394

 

Y

 

16.4%

 

Cary, NC

 

2001

 

1993/94/97

 

112,333

 

89.4%

 

797

 

N

 

11.9%

 

Charlotte, NC

 

2002

 

1999

 

69,000

 

88.3%

 

743

 

Y

 

44.2%

 

Raleigh, NC

 

1998

 

1994/95

 

48,675

 

88.3%

 

419

 

Y

 

11.4%

 

Bordentown, NJ

 

2012

 

2006

 

50,600

 

81.3%

 

383

 

N

 

27.0%

 

Brick, NJ

 

1996

 

1981

 

51,725

 

84.7%

 

433

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Cherry Hill I, NJ

 

2010

 

2004

 

51,600

 

93.6%

 

376

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Cherry Hill II, NJ

 

2012

 

2004

 

64,850

 

84.6%

 

610

 

N

 

74.2%

 

Clifton, NJ

 

2005

 

2001

 

105,450

 

91.6%

 

1,013

 

Y

 

92.4%

 

Cranford, NJ

 

1996

 

1987

 

91,280

 

91.9%

 

855

 

Y

 

8.0%

 

East Hanover, NJ

 

1996

 

1983

 

107,679

 

81.9%

 

966

 

N

 

3.4%

 

Egg Harbor I, NJ

 

2010

 

2005

 

35,425

 

96.3%

 

287

 

N

 

14.2%

 

Egg Harbor II, NJ

 

2010

 

2002

 

70,400

 

83.9%

 

685

 

N

 

19.9%

 

Elizabeth, NJ

 

2005

 

1925/97

 

38,830

 

91.5%

 

674

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Fairview, NJ

 

1997

 

1989

 

27,876

 

90.0%

 

444

 

N

 

98.4%

 

Freehold, NJ

 

2012

 

2002

 

81,470

 

94.4%

 

746

 

Y

 

65.8%

 

Hamilton, NJ

 

2006

 

1990

 

70,550

 

90.5%

 

606

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

2005

 

1945/97

 

34,180

 

86.6%

 

743

 

N

 

99.3%

 

Linden, NJ

 

1996

 

1983

 

100,425

 

92.8%

 

1,118

 

N

 

5.3%

 

Lumberton, NJ

 

2012

 

2004

 

95,975

 

79.9%

 

771

 

Y

 

32.5%

 

Morris Township, NJ (6)

 

1997

 

1972

 

71,976

 

88.5%

 

564

 

Y

 

5.7%

 

Parsippany, NJ

 

1997

 

1981

 

66,325

 

90.4%

 

566

 

Y

 

19.4%

 

Rahway, NJ

 

2013

 

2006

 

83,171

 

87.1%

 

982

 

N

 

92.2%

 

Randolph, NJ

 

2002

 

1998/99

 

52,565

 

87.2%

 

539

 

Y

 

91.1%

 

Sewell, NJ

 

2001

 

1984/98

 

57,826

 

88.4%

 

454

 

N

 

9.4%

 

Somerset, NJ

 

2012

 

2000

 

57,585

 

87.7%

 

514

 

N

 

82.8%

 

Whippany, NJ

 

2013

 

2007

 

92,270

 

78.4%

 

939

 

N

 

85.8%

 

Albuquerque I, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

65,927

 

87.6%

 

607

 

Y

 

13.8%

 

Albuquerque II, NM

 

2005

 

1985

 

58,511

 

93.2%

 

524

 

Y

 

15.8%

 

Albuquerque III, NM

 

2005

 

1986

 

57,536

 

88.6%

 

483

 

Y

 

12.0%

 

Las Vegas I, NV †

 

2006

 

1986

 

48,332

 

83.2%

 

369

 

Y

 

13.3%

 

Las Vegas II, NV

 

2006

 

1997

 

48,850

 

88.9%

 

522

 

Y

 

65.6%

 

Bronx I, NY

 

2010

 

1931/2004

 

68,698

 

90.3%

 

1,316

 

N

 

97.4%

 

Bronx II, NY (5)

 

2011

 

2006

 

90,170

 

91.4%

 

829

 

N

 

98.8%

 

Bronx III, NY

 

2011

 

2007

 

106,065

 

83.9%

 

2,034

 

N

 

99.1%

 

Bronx IV, NY (5)

 

2011

 

2007

 

75,080

 

90.4%

 

1,310

 

N

 

99.2%

 

Bronx V, NY (5)

 

2011

 

2007

 

54,733

 

87.3%

 

1,099

 

N

 

99.6%

 

Bronx VI, NY (5)

 

2011

 

2011

 

39,495

 

91.2%

 

1,096

 

N

 

97.4%

 

Bronx VII, NY (5)

 

2012

 

2005

 

78,625

 

85.3%

 

1,524

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Bronx VIII, NY

 

2012

 

1928

 

30,550

 

83.7%

 

545

 

N

 

99.8%

 

Bronx IX, NY

 

2012

 

1973

 

148,570

 

87.7%

 

3,016

 

Y

 

99.5%

 

Bronx X, NY

 

2012

 

2001

 

159,780

 

86.8%

 

2,758

 

Y

 

74.7%

 

Brooklyn I, NY

 

2010

 

1917/2004

 

57,020

 

87.3%

 

861

 

N

 

99.8%

 

30



Table of Contents

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Brooklyn II, NY

 

2010

 

1962/2003

 

60,920

 

89.4%

 

1,146

 

N

 

18.8%

 

Brooklyn III, NY

 

2011

 

2006

 

41,635

 

85.6%

 

851

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Brooklyn IV, NY

 

2011

 

2006

 

37,467

 

83.0%

 

793

 

N

 

99.9%

 

Brooklyn V, NY

 

2011

 

2007

 

47,010

 

88.4%

 

885

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Brooklyn VI, NY

 

2011

 

2007

 

75,980

 

83.8%

 

1,417

 

N

 

97.5%

 

Brooklyn VII, NY

 

2011

 

2006

 

72,685

 

86.7%

 

1,399

 

N

 

99.9%

 

Jamaica I, NY

 

2001

 

2000

 

88,485

 

90.7%

 

920

 

Y

 

21.4%

 

Jamaica II, NY

 

2011

 

2010

 

91,245

 

87.9%

 

1,472

 

N

 

99.9%

 

New Rochelle I, NY

 

2005

 

1998

 

46,068

 

76.1%

 

400

 

N

 

25.1%

 

New Rochelle II, NY

 

2012

 

1917

 

63,145

 

88.9%

 

1,024

 

Y

 

52.9%

 

North Babylon, NY

 

1998

 

1988/99

 

78,188

 

92.3%

 

652

 

N

 

11.6%

 

Riverhead, NY

 

2005

 

1985/86/99

 

38,340

 

89.8%

 

328

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Southold, NY

 

2005

 

1989

 

59,451

 

95.3%

 

604

 

N

 

4.8%

 

Staten Island, NY

 

2013

 

1900/2011

 

96,823

 

49.7%

 

918

 

N

 

39.8%

 

Tuckahoe, NY

 

2011

 

2007

 

51,343

 

85.6%

 

758

 

N

 

99.7%

 

West Hempstead, NY

 

2012

 

2002

 

84,507

 

89.2%

 

899

 

Y

 

35.3%

 

White Plains, NY

 

2011

 

1938

 

86,400

 

89.7%

 

1,506

 

N

 

26.4%

 

Woodhaven, NY

 

2011

 

2008

 

50,665

 

90.0%

 

1,029

 

N

 

99.9%

 

Wyckoff, NY

 

2010

 

1910/2007

 

61,835

 

87.6%

 

1,042

 

N

 

96.2%

 

Yorktown, NY

 

2011

 

2006

 

78,615

 

92.5%

 

780

 

Y

 

79.3%

 

Cleveland I, OH

 

2005

 

1997/99

 

46,000

 

93.7%

 

339

 

Y

 

7.3%

 

Cleveland II, OH

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,425

 

89.2%

 

571

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Columbus, OH

 

2006

 

1999

 

71,905

 

89.2%

 

604

 

Y

 

26.1%

 

Grove City, OH

 

2006

 

1997

 

89,290

 

87.3%

 

773

 

Y

 

15.1%

 

Hilliard, OH

 

2006

 

1995

 

89,690

 

88.7%

 

777

 

Y

 

25.2%

 

Lakewood, OH

 

1989*

 

1989

 

39,337

 

93.2%

 

455

 

Y

 

37.9%

 

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980

 

93,200

 

89.8%

 

687

 

Y

 

5.1%

 

North Olmsted I, OH

 

1979*

 

1979

 

48,665

 

96.3%

 

444

 

Y

 

10.5%

 

North Olmsted II, OH

 

1988*

 

1988

 

47,850

 

86.1%

 

397

 

Y

 

24.1%

 

North Randall, OH

 

1998*

 

1998/2002

 

80,239

 

88.2%

 

795

 

N

 

92.1%

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

2006

 

1979

 

67,295

 

88.7%

 

666

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Strongsville, OH

 

2007

 

1978

 

43,507

 

91.5%

 

400

 

Y

 

100.0%

 

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

1980*

 

1980/82/98

 

90,281

 

89.2%

 

723

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Westlake, OH

 

2005

 

2001

 

62,750

 

91.3%

 

453

 

Y

 

8.6%

 

Conshohocken, PA

 

2012

 

2003

 

81,470

 

90.9%

 

730

 

Y

 

39.6%

 

Exton, PA

 

2012

 

2006

 

57,750

 

89.4%

 

543

 

N

 

73.2%

 

Langhorne, PA

 

2012

 

2001

 

65,050

 

82.8%

 

669

 

Y

 

30.3%

 

Levittown, PA

 

2001

 

2000

 

76,180

 

90.0%

 

656

 

Y

 

34.7%

 

Montgomeryville, PA

 

2012

 

2003

 

84,145

 

88.2%

 

773

 

Y

 

38.2%

 

Norristown, PA

 

2011

 

2005

 

52,031

 

84.3%

 

495

 

N

 

86.1%

 

Philadelphia, PA

 

2001

 

1999

 

97,364

 

88.5%

 

962

 

N

 

45.3%

 

Antioch, TN

 

2005

 

1985/98

 

76,190

 

89.7%

 

617

 

Y

 

7.4%

 

Nashville I, TN

 

2005

 

1984

 

103,560

 

86.9%

 

695

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Nashville II, TN

 

2005

 

1986/2000

 

83,384

 

89.1%

 

628

 

Y

 

12.7%

 

Nashville III, TN

 

2006

 

1985

 

101,575

 

94.8%

 

597

 

Y

 

8.5%

 

31



Table of Contents

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

Nashville IV, TN

 

2006

 

1986/2000

 

102,450

 

93.1%

 

733

 

Y

 

10.1%

 

Allen, TX

 

2012

 

2003

 

62,290

 

93.5%

 

514

 

Y

 

55.6%

 

Austin I, TX

 

2005

 

2001

 

59,520

 

87.0%

 

534

 

Y

 

63.4%

 

Austin II, TX

 

2006

 

2000/03

 

65,151

 

88.2%

 

592

 

Y

 

45.8%

 

Austin III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

70,535

 

90.5%

 

570

 

Y

 

92.7%

 

Bryan, TX

 

2005

 

1994

 

60,450

 

85.6%

 

495

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Carrollton, TX

 

2012

 

2002

 

77,440

 

91.4%

 

539

 

Y

 

39.9%

 

College Station, TX

 

2005

 

1993

 

26,550

 

81.9%

 

346

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Cypress, TX

 

2012

 

1998

 

57,711

 

85.8%

 

441

 

Y

 

45.8%

 

Dallas I, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

58,582

 

91.7%

 

532

 

Y

 

37.8%

 

Dallas II, TX

 

2013

 

1996

 

79,155

 

77.1%

 

603

 

N

 

27.8%

 

Denton, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

60,846

 

84.5%

 

461

 

Y

 

3.2%

 

El Paso I, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

59,852

 

84.0%

 

512

 

Y

 

6.2%

 

El Paso II, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

48,704

 

82.7%

 

408

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

El Paso III, TX

 

2005

 

1980

 

71,152

 

77.5%

 

584

 

Y

 

5.3%

 

El Paso IV, TX

 

2005

 

1983

 

66,906

 

86.6%

 

515

 

Y

 

2.9%

 

El Paso V, TX

 

2005

 

1982

 

62,290

 

81.1%

 

405

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

El Paso VI, TX

 

2005

 

1985

 

36,620

 

88.7%

 

254

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

El Paso VII, TX

 

2005

 

1982

 

33,945

 

40.1%

 

13

 

N

 

0.0%

 

Fort Worth I, TX

 

2005

 

2000

 

50,521

 

89.1%

 

405

 

Y

 

38.8%

 

Fort Worth II, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

72,900

 

90.2%

 

653

 

Y

 

68.5%

 

Frisco I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

50,754

 

89.5%

 

428

 

Y

 

25.6%

 

Frisco II, TX

 

2005

 

1998/2002

 

71,099

 

90.1%

 

513

 

Y

 

28.9%

 

Frisco III, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

74,915

 

87.9%

 

614

 

Y

 

92.4%

 

Frisco IV, TX †

 

2010

 

2007

 

75,035

 

86.2%

 

511

 

Y

 

21.3%

 

Garland I, TX

 

2006

 

1991

 

70,100

 

90.3%

 

679

 

Y

 

4.3%

 

Garland II, TX

 

2006

 

2004

 

68,425

 

93.7%

 

469

 

Y

 

53.9%

 

Houston III, TX

 

2005

 

1984

 

60,820

 

95.1%

 

459

 

Y

 

9.1%

 

Houston IV, TX

 

2005

 

1987

 

43,750

 

93.2%

 

381

 

Y

 

10.2%

 

Houston V, TX †

 

2006

 

1980/97

 

126,065

 

90.5%

 

1,011

 

Y

 

61.4%

 

Houston VI, TX

 

2011

 

2002

 

54,680

 

94.5%

 

588

 

Y

 

99.8%

 

Houston VII, TX

 

2012

 

2004

 

47,227

 

95.4%

 

533

 

N

 

100.0%

 

Houston VIII, TX

 

2012

 

1989

 

54,213

 

89.3%

 

498

 

N

 

68.9%

 

Houston IX, TX

 

2012

 

1992

 

51,197

 

95.9%

 

429

 

Y

 

48.3%

 

Katy, TX

 

2013

 

2009

 

71,308

 

82.4%

 

578

 

N

 

88.6%

 

Keller, TX

 

2006

 

2000

 

61,885

 

90.7%

 

486

 

Y

 

23.2%

 

Lewisville I, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

58,140

 

91.8%

 

429

 

Y

 

22.3%

 

Lewisville II, TX

 

2013

 

2003

 

127,509

 

88.4%

 

1,197

 

N

 

27.4%

 

Mansfield I, TX

 

2006

 

2003

 

63,025

 

85.4%

 

481

 

Y

 

43.1%

 

Mansfield II, TX

 

2012

 

2002

 

57,775

 

91.7%

 

483

 

Y

 

68.2%

 

McKinney I, TX

 

2005

 

1996

 

47,020

 

94.0%

 

360

 

Y

 

12.2%

 

McKinney II, TX

 

2006

 

1996

 

70,050

 

92.3%

 

537

 

Y

 

47.3%

 

North Richland Hills, TX

 

2005

 

2002

 

57,200

 

86.3%

 

433

 

Y

 

60.5%

 

Pearland, TX

 

2012

 

1985

 

72,060

 

84.9%

 

460

 

N

 

45.9%

 

Roanoke, TX

 

2005

 

1996/2001

 

59,420

 

92.8%

 

447

 

Y

 

30.7%

 

Richmond, TX

 

2013

 

1998

 

125,275

 

87.3%

 

535

 

N

 

29.8%

 

32



Table of Contents

Facility Location

 

Year
Acquired /
Developed
(1)

 

Year Built

 

Rentable
Square
Feet

 

Occupancy
(2)

 

Units

 

Manager
Apartment
(3)

 

%
Climate
Controlled
(4)

 

San Antonio I, TX

 

2005

 

2005

 

73,309

 

83.5%

 

575

 

Y

 

89.4%

 

San Antonio II, TX

 

2006

 

2005

 

73,230

 

83.6%

 

670

 

N

 

91.5%

 

San Antonio III, TX

 

2007

 

2006

 

71,775

 

84.7%

 

565

 

N

 

93.7%

 

Spring, TX

 

2006

 

1980/86

 

72,751

 

90.4%

 

534

 

Y

 

26.7%

 

Murray I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

60,280

 

87.3%

 

621

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Murray II, UT †

 

2005

 

1978

 

71,221

 

92.7%

 

371

 

Y

 

5.4%

 

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

2005

 

1976

 

56,446

 

85.0%

 

725

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

2005

 

1978

 

51,676

 

89.6%

 

482

 

Y

 

0.0%

 

Alexandria, VA

 

2012

 

2000

 

114,650

 

86.8%

 

1,153

 

Y

 

97.2%

 

Burke Lake, VA

 

2011

 

2003

 

91,747

 

82.2%

 

898

 

Y

 

81.6%

 

Fairfax, VA

 

2012

 

1999

 

73,650

 

88.7%

 

683

 

N

 

88.3%

 

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

2005

 

2001/04

 

69,475

 

88.3%

 

610

 

N

 

21.9%

 

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

2005

 

1998/2001

 

61,207

 

84.1%

 

561

 

N

 

87.0%

 

Leesburg, VA

 

2011

 

2001/04

 

85,503

 

89.5%

 

890

 

Y

 

83.9%

 

McLearen, VA

 

2010

 

2002

 

68,960

 

88.6%

 

722

 

Y

 

90.9%

 

Manassas, VA

 

2010

 

1998

 

73,045

 

84.3%

 

639

 

Y

 

64.7%

 

Vienna, VA

 

2012

 

2000

 

54,698

 

92.2%

 

561

 

Y

 

97.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total/Weighted Average (366 facilities)

 

 

 

 

 

24,662,105

 

88.3%

 

236,791

 

 

 

 

 

 


* Denotes facilities developed by us.

 

† Denotes facilities that contain a significant amount of commercial rentable square footage.  All of this commercial space, which was developed in conjunction with the self-storage units,cubes, is located within or adjacent to our self-storage facilities and is managed by our self-storage facility managers.  As of December 31, 2010, there was2013, facilities in our portfolio included an aggregate of approximately 420,000277,000 rentable square feet of commercial space at these facilities.space.

 

(1) Represents the year acquired for those facilities we acquired from a third party or the year developed for those facilities developed by us.we developed.

 

(2) Represents occupied square feet divided by total rentable square feet at December 31, 2010.2013.

 

(3) Indicates whether a facility has an on-site apartment where a manager resides.

 

(4) Represents the percentage of rentable square feet in climate-controlled units.cubes.

 

(5) We do not own the land at this facility.these facilities.  We lease the land pursuant to a ground leaseleases that expires in 2013, but have eight five-yearexpire between 2052 and 2061, subject to renewal options.

 

(6) We have ground leases for certain small parcels of land adjacent to these facilities that expire between 20102014 and 2015.2019.

 

Our growth has been achievedWe have grown by adding facilities to our portfolio through acquisitions and development. The tables set forth below show the average occupancy, annual rent per occupied square foot, average occupied square feet and total revenues for our facilities owned as of December 31, 2010,2013, and for each of the previous three years, grouped by the year during which we first owned or operated the facility.

 

Our Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupied Square Feet (1)

 

 

 

 

Rentable Square

 

Average Occupancy

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

Feet

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

22,811,295

 

76.7

%

76.0

%

79.8

%

2008

 

1

 

84,975

 

80.1

%

72.3

%

69.5

%

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

738,348

 

67.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

23,634,618

 

76.7

%

75.9

%

79.8

%

2833



Table of Contents

 

Our Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupancy

 

 

 

 

Rentable Square

 

Average Occupancy

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

Feet

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010 and earlier

 

283

 

18,734,001

 

88.3%

 

82.7%

 

79.2%

 

2011

 

26

 

1,796,173

 

88.5%

 

82.3%

 

78.7%

 

2012

 

37

 

2,635,909

 

87.6%

 

83.8%

 

 

2013

 

20

 

1,496,022

 

80.6%

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2013

 

366

 

24,662,105

 

88.0%

 

82.8%

 

79.2%

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Annual Rent Per Occupied Square Foot (1)(2)

 

 

 

 

 

Rent per Square Foot

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

$

11.57

 

$

11.73

 

$

11.49

 

2008

 

1

 

21.59

 

22.13

 

21.12

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

13.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

$

11.66

 

$

11.76

 

$

11.52

 

 

 

 

 

Rent per Square Foot

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 and earlier

 

283

 

$

12.43

 

$

12.42

 

$

12.59

 

2011

 

26

 

24.48

 

24.01

 

22.80

 

2012

 

37

 

18.15

 

15.55

 

 

2013

 

20

 

12.44

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2013

 

366

 

$

13.93

 

$

13.67

 

$

13.48

 

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Average Occupied Square Feet (3)

 

 

 

 

 

Average Occupied Square Feet

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

17,512,913

 

17,982,611

 

18,961,704

 

2008

 

1

 

67,973

 

61,113

 

58,844

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

480,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

18,061,804

 

18,043,724

 

19,020,548

 

 

 

 

 

Average Occupied Square Feet

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 and earlier

 

283

 

16,487,436

 

15,517,599

 

14,884,230

 

2011

 

26

 

1,590,812

 

1,476,913

 

1,409,521

 

2012

 

37

 

2,309,401

 

2,199,295

 

 

2013

 

20

 

1,191,148

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2013

 

366

 

21,578,797

 

19,193,807

 

16,293,751

 

 

Facilities by Year Acquired - Total Revenues (dollars in thousands) (4)

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

Year Acquired (2)

 

# of Facilities

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2007 and earlier

 

350

 

$

209,222

 

$

215,245

 

$

222,748

 

2008

 

1

 

1,527

 

1,404

 

1,309

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

12

 

1,663

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2010

 

363

 

$

212,412

 

$

216,649

 

$

224,057

 

 

 

 

 

Total Revenues

 

Year Acquired (1)

 

# of Facilities

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 and earlier

 

283

 

$

216,914

 

$

202,386

 

$

194,831

 

2011

 

26

 

41,005

 

36,945

 

9,548

 

2012

 

37

 

43,926

 

19,028

 

 

2013

 

20

 

7,048

 

 

 

All Facilities Owned as of December 31, 2013

 

366

 

$

308,893

 

$

258,359

 

$

204,379

 

34



Table of Contents

 


(1)For facilities developed by us, “Year Acquired” represents the year in which we acquired such facilities from an affiliated entity, which in some cases is later than the year developed.

(2)Determined by dividing the aggregate rental revenue for each twelve-month period by the average of the month-end occupied square feet for the period.  Rental revenue includes customerthe impact of promotional discounts, which reduce rental revenues, access, administrativeincome over the promotional period, of $15.7 million, $15.0 million and late fees$12.0 million, for the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and revenues from auctions, but does not include ancillary revenues generated at our facilities.2011.

 

(2)  For facilities developed by us, “Year Acquired” represents the year in which such facilities were acquired by our operating partnership from an affiliated entity, which in some cases is later than the year developed.

(3)Represents the average of the aggregate month-end occupied square feet for the twelve-month period for each group of facilities.

 

29(4)



Table of Contents

(4)  Represents the result obtained by multiplying total income per occupied square foot by the average occupied square feet for the twelve-month period for each group of facilities.  This result will vary from amounts reported on the financial statements.

 

Unconsolidated Real Estate Venture

On December 10, 2013, we acquired a 50% ownership interest in 35 self-storage facilities located in Texas (34) and North Carolina (1) through the newly-formed HHF joint venture.  These facilities contain an aggregate of 2.4 million rentable square feet.  The joint venture paid $315.7 million for these facilities.  We and our joint venture partner each contributed 50% of the equity capital required to fund the acquisition.  We account for our investment in the HHF joint venture using the equity method.  See note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.

Planned Renovations and Improvements

 

We have a capital improvement and property renovation program that includes office upgrades, adding climate control atto selected units,cubes, construction of parking areas safety and security enhancements, and generalother facility upgrades.  For 2011,2014, we anticipate spending approximately $7 million to $9$11 million associated with these capital expenditures and expect to enhance the safety and improve the aesthetic appeal of our facilities.expenditures.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are involved in claims from time to time, including the proceeding identified below, which arise in the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, we have made adequate provisions for potential liabilities, if any, arising from any such matters.  However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the costs and other effects of pending or future litigation, governmental investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings (whether civil or criminal), settlements, judgments and investigations, claims and changes in any such matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

 

On November 4, 2009, our Operating Partnership was sued in the Delaware Court of Chancery by Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, and Amsdell Holdings I, Inc. (collectively, the “Amsdell Plaintiffs”).  The Amsdell Plaintiffs amended their complaint in 2010 to include the Company as a defendant.  The Amsdell Plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeks to compel our Operating Partnership to indemnify the Amsdell Plaintiffs for losses and expenses allegedly incurred by the Amsdell Plaintiffs from legal proceedings filed against the Amsdell Plaintiffs, which proceedings alleged, inter alia, that the Amsdell Plaintiffs breached an agreement to purchase certain real estate located in Brighton, Massachusetts in 2001.  We are vigorously defending against this action.  The matter is presently in the discovery phase and no trial date has been set by the Court.  Wh ile management currently believes that resolving this matter will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or operating results, litigation, as noted above, is subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of this matter may change in the future.

ITEM 4.  REMOVED AND RESERVEDMINING SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

3035



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDERMATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

As of December 31, 2010,2013, there were approximately 5278 registered record holders of ourthe Parent Company’s common shares.  This figure doesshares and 12 holders (other than the Parent Company) of the Operating Partnership’s common units. These figures do not include beneficial owners who hold shares in nominee name. There is no established trading market for these units of the Operating Partnership. The following table shows the high and low closing prices per share for our common shares,share, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, and the cash dividends declared with respect to such shares:

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Cash Dividends 
Declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Dividends

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Declared

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

5.03

 

$

1.40

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

12.14

 

$

10.30

 

$

0.080

 

Second quarter

 

$

4.93

 

$

2.12

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

12.81

 

$

10.90

 

$

0.080

 

Third quarter

 

$

6.83

 

$

4.23

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

13.48

 

$

11.69

 

$

0.080

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

7.60

 

$

5.70

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

14.67

 

$

12.59

 

$

0.110

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First quarter

 

$

7.70

 

$

6.31

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

15.92

 

$

14.24

 

$

0.110

 

Second quarter

 

$

8.98

 

$

7.25

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

17.57

 

$

15.48

 

$

0.110

 

Third quarter

 

$

8.86

 

$

6.88

 

$

0.025

 

 

$

17.96

 

$

15.94

 

$

0.110

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

9.56

 

$

8.19

 

$

0.070

 

 

$

19.48

 

$

15.12

 

$

0.130

 

For each quarter in 2012 and 2013, the Operating Partnership paid a cash distribution per unit in an amount equal to the dividend paid on a common share for each such quarter.

 

Since our initial quarter as a publicly-traded REIT, we have made regular quarterly distributions to our shareholders.  Distributions to shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, we provide each of ourthe Parent Company’s common shareholders a statement detailing the tax characterization of dividends paid during the preceding year as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of the Parent Company’s dividends for 2013 consisted of a 55.9082% ordinary income distribution and a 44.0918% capital gain distribution from earnings and profits.

Distributions to 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, we provide each of the Parent Company’s preferred shareholders a statement detailing preferred distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of our preferred dividends for 2010 was 100%2013 consisted of a 65.7893% ordinary income distribution.distribution and a 34.2107% capital gain distribution from earnings and profits.

 

We intend to continue to declare quarterly distributions.  However, we cannot provide any assurance as to the amount or timing of future distributions.  Under the revolving portion of our revolving credit facility,Credit Facility, we are restricted from paying distributions on ourthe Parent Company’s common shares that would exceed an amount equal toin excess of the greater of (i) 95% of our funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain our REIT status.

 

To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our earnings and profits, as computed for federal income tax purposes, these distributions will represent a return of capital, rather than a dividend, for federal income tax purposes. Distributions that are treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes generally will not be taxable as a dividend to a U.S. shareholder, but will reduce the shareholder’s basis in its shares (but not below zero) and therefore can result in the shareholder having a higher gain upon a subsequent sale of such shares.  Return of capital distributions in excess of a shareholder’s basis generally will be treated as gain from the sale of such shares for federal income tax purposes.

 

36



Table of Contents

Share Performance Graph

 

The SEC requires us to present a chart comparing the cumulative total shareholder return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, on our common shares with the cumulative total shareholder return of (i) a broad equity index and (ii) a published industry or peer group index. The following chart compares the yearly cumulative total shareholder return for our common shares with the cumulative shareholder return of companies on (i) the S&P 500 Index, (ii) the Russell 2000 and (iii) the NAREIT All Equity REIT Index as provided by NAREIT for the period beginning December 31, 20052008 and ending December 31, 2010.2013.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

 

Period Ending

 

 

Period Ending

 

Index

 

12/31/05

 

12/31/06

 

12/31/07

 

12/31/08

 

12/31/09

 

12/31/10

 

 

12/31/08

 

12/31/09

 

12/31/10

 

12/31/11

 

12/31/12

 

12/31/13

 

U-Store-It Trust

 

100.00

 

103.33

 

49.25

 

25.62

 

43.25

 

57.05

 

CubeSmart

 

100.00

 

168.81

 

222.65

 

255.96

 

362.99

 

408.40

 

S&P 500

 

100.00

 

115.79

 

122.16

 

76.96

 

97.33

 

111.99

 

 

100.00

 

126.46

 

145.51

 

148.59

 

172.37

 

228.19

 

Russell 2000

 

100.00

 

118.37

 

116.51

 

77.15

 

98.11

 

124.46

 

 

100.00

 

127.17

 

161.32

 

154.59

 

179.86

 

249.69

 

NAREIT All Equity REIT Index

 

100.00

 

135.06

 

113.87

 

70.91

 

90.76

 

116.12

 

 

100.00

 

127.99

 

163.76

 

177.32

 

212.26

 

218.32

 

 

The following table provides information about repurchases of the Company’s common shares during the three-month period ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased (1)

 

Average Price Paid 
Per Share

 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased as 
Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 
Programs

 

Maximum Number 
of Shares that May 
Yet Be Purchased 
Under the Plans

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October

 

171

 

$

8.43

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

November

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

December

 

544

 

$

8.79

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

715

 

 

 

N/A

 

3,000,000

 


(1)  Represents common shares withheld by the Company upon the vesting of restricted shares to cover employee tax obligations.

32



Table of Contents

(2)  On JuneSeptember 27, 2007, the Parent Company announced that the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program for up to 3.0 million of the Parent Company’s outstanding common shares.  Unless terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Trustees, the program will expire when the number of authorized shares has been repurchased. The Parent Company has made no repurchases under this program.program to date and there were no other repurchases of the Parent Company’s common shares during the year ended December 31, 2013.

37



Table of Contents

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

CUBESMART

 

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on a historical consolidated basis for the Parent Company.  The selected historical financial informationdata for the five-year period ended December 31, 20102013 was derived from the Parent Company’s financial statements.statements, which have been audited by KPMG LLP.

 

The following data should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto of the Parent Company and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.Report.

 

3338



Table of Contents

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

$

186,330

 

$

171,059

 

 

$

281,250

 

$

236,160

 

$

188,249

 

$

165,631

 

$

164,541

 

Other property related income

 

18,640

 

16,086

 

15,130

 

15,148

 

13,344

 

 

32,365

 

25,821

 

18,987

 

15,697

 

13,389

 

Other - related party

 

 

 

 

365

 

457

 

Property management fee income

 

2,829

 

56

 

 

 

 

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

2,829

 

56

 

Total revenues

 

216,826

 

210,732

 

217,330

 

201,843

 

184,860

 

 

318,395

 

266,322

 

211,004

 

184,157

 

177,986

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

93,696

 

91,380

 

92,533

 

86,358

 

75,921

 

 

118,222

 

103,488

 

87,570

 

78,581

 

77,083

 

Property operating expenses - related party

 

 

 

 

59

 

69

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

62,945

 

69,125

 

71,974

 

63,183

 

58,043

 

 

112,313

 

109,830

 

61,972

 

53,410

 

57,185

 

Asset write-off

 

 

 

 

 

305

 

Lease abandonment

 

 

 

 

1,316

 

 

General and administrative

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

24,964

 

21,966

 

21,675

 

 

29,563

 

26,131

 

24,693

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

General and administrative - related party

 

 

 

 

337

 

613

 

Total operating expenses

 

182,047

 

183,074

 

189,471

 

173,219

 

156,626

 

 

260,098

 

239,449

 

174,235

 

157,397

 

156,837

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

34,779

 

27,658

 

27,859

 

28,624

 

28,234

 

 

58,297

 

26,873

 

36,769

 

26,760

 

21,149

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(37,794

)

(45,269

)

(52,014

)

(54,108

)

(45,628

)

 

(40,424

)

(40,318

)

(32,787

)

(37,367

)

(44,828

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

(1,929

)

(1,772

)

(1,972

)

 

(2,058

)

(3,279

)

(5,028

)

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

Early extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

(1,907

)

Interest income

 

621

 

681

 

153

 

401

 

1,336

 

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

(414

)

 

(8,167

)

 

 

Acquisition related costs

 

(759

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,849

)

(3,086

)

(3,823

)

(759

)

 

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(281

)

 

 

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

7,023

 

 

 

 

Other

 

(235

)

(33

)

94

 

118

 

191

 

 

8

 

256

 

(83

)

386

 

648

 

Total other expense

 

(44,630

)

(46,960

)

(53,696

)

(55,361

)

(47,980

)

 

(47,888

)

(40,149

)

(50,169

)

(44,203

)

(46,519

)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

(9,851

)

(19,302

)

(25,837

)

(26,737

)

(19,746

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

10,409

 

(13,276

)

(13,400

)

(17,443

)

(25,370

)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

9,973

 

10,422

 

 

4,145

 

7,093

 

11,944

 

9,598

 

10,899

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

2,517

 

 

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

Total discontinued operations

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

12,490

 

10,422

 

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

11,424

 

25,038

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

3,102

 

(14,247

)

(9,324

)

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

41,994

 

3,628

 

2,447

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

381

 

60

 

(310

)

1,170

 

773

 

 

(588

)

107

 

(35

)

381

 

60

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

 

 

 

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

(1,755

)

(665

)

NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

41,448

 

1,817

 

(398

)

(7,393

)

(937

)

Distribution to preferred shareholders

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

$

(0.43

)

$

(0.32

)

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.04

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.46

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.17

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.15

)

Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.19

)

$

(0.34

)

Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.33

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding (1)

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

57,497

 

57,287

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.19

)

$

(0.34

)

Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.33

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding (1)

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding (1)

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

$

(24,542

)

$

(18,108

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

$

(18,223

)

$

(23,947

)

Total discontinued operations

 

3,656

 

17,984

 

26,595

 

11,465

 

9,557

 

 

31,048

 

16,498

 

15,118

 

10,830

 

23,010

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(13,077

)

$

(8,551

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

 

3439



Table of Contents

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

1,559,958

 

$

1,647,118

 

$

1,566,815

 

 

$

2,155,170

 

$

2,089,707

 

$

1,788,720

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

Total assets

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

1,597,659

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

 

2,358,624

 

2,150,319

 

1,875,979

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

500,000

 

250,000

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

43,000

 

 

172,000

 

219,000

 

90,500

 

 

38,600

 

45,000

 

 

43,000

 

 

Unsecured term loan

 

200,000

 

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

Unsecured term loans

 

400,000

 

500,000

 

400,000

 

200,000

 

 

Secured term loan

 

 

200,000

 

57,419

 

47,444

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

548,085

 

561,057

 

588,930

 

 

200,218

 

228,759

 

358,441

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

Total liabilities

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

1,028,705

 

1,083,230

 

930,948

 

 

1,229,142

 

1,112,420

 

830,925

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

Noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

46,026

 

48,982

 

107,606

 

U-Store-It Trust shareholders’ equity

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

522,928

 

555,619

 

576,785

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

36,275

 

47,990

 

49,732

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

Total CubeSmart shareholders’ equity

 

1,092,276

 

989,791

 

955,913

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

 

 

 

 

931

 

118

 

39,409

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

1,597,659

 

1,687,831

 

1,615,339

 

 

2,358,624

 

2,150,319

 

1,875,979

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of facilities

 

363

 

367

 

387

 

409

 

399

 

 

366

 

381

 

370

 

363

 

367

 

Total rentable square feet (in thousands)

 

23,635

 

23,749

 

24,973

 

26,119

 

25,436

 

 

24,662

 

25,485

 

24,420

 

23,635

 

23,749

 

Occupancy percentage

 

76.3

%

75.2

%

78.9

%

79.5

%

78.2

%

 

88.3

%

84.4

%

78.4

%

76.3

%

75.2

%

Cash dividends declared per share (2)

 

$

0.145

 

$

0.10

 

$

0.565

 

$

1.05

 

$

1.16

 

 

$

0.460

 

$

0.350

 

$

0.290

 

$

0.145

 

$

0.100

 

 


(1)         Excludes operating partnershipOperating Partnership units issued at our IPO and in connection with the acquisition of facilities subsequent to our IPO.  Operating partnershipPartnership units have been excluded from the earnings per share calculations as the related income or loss is presented in Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership.

 

(2)         The CompanyWe announced full quarterly dividends of $0.29 per common share on December 1, 2005, February 22, 2006, April 24, 2006, August 23, 2006, November 3, 2006, February 21, 2007, May 8, 2007, and August 14, 2007;  dividends of $0.18 per common share on December 13, 2007,  February 27, 2008,  May 7, 2008, and August 6, 2008; dividends of $0.025 per common share on December 11, 2008, January 22,February 25, 2009, April 22,May 26, 2009, July 22, 2009, October 22,August 5, 2009, December 5,10, 2009, February 24, 2010, June 2, 2010, and August 4, 2010; and dividends of $0.07$0.070 per common share on December 14, 2010.2010, February 23, 2011,  June 1, 2011, and August 3, 2011; dividends of $0.080 and $0.393 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 8, 2011; dividends of $0.080 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on February 21, 2012, May 30, 2012 and August 1, 2012; dividends of $0.110 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 10, 2012, February 21, 2013, May 29, 2013, and August 7, 2013, and dividends of $0.130 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 19, 2013.

CUBESMART, L.P.

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on a historical consolidated basis for the Operating Partnership.  The selected historical financial data for the five-year period ended December 31, 2013 was derived from the Operating Partnership’s financial statements, which have been audited by KPMG LLP.

The following data should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto of the Operating Partnership and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Report.

40



Table of Contents

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per unit data)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

281,250

 

$

236,160

 

$

188,249

 

$

165,631

 

$

164,541

 

Other property related income

 

32,365

 

25,821

 

18,987

 

15,697

 

13,389

 

Property management fee income

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

2,829

 

56

 

Total revenues

 

318,395

 

266,322

 

211,004

 

184,157

 

177,986

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

118,222

 

103,488

 

87,570

 

78,581

 

77,083

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

112,313

 

109,830

 

61,972

 

53,410

 

57,185

 

General and administrative

 

29,563

 

26,131

 

24,693

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

Total operating expenses

 

260,098

 

239,449

 

174,235

 

157,397

 

156,837

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

58,297

 

26,873

 

36,769

 

26,760

 

21,149

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(40,424

)

(40,318

)

(32,787

)

(37,367

)

(44,828

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(2,058

)

(3,279

)

(5,028

)

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

(414

)

 

(8,167

)

 

 

Acquisition related costs

 

(3,849

)

(3,086

)

(3,823

)

(759

)

 

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(281

)

 

 

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

7,023

 

 

 

 

Other

 

8

 

256

 

(83

)

386

 

648

 

Total other expense

 

(47,888

)

(40,149

)

(50,169

)

(44,203

)

(46,519

)

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

10,409

 

(13,276

)

(13,400

)

(17,443

)

(25,370

)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

4,145

 

7,093

 

11,944

 

9,598

 

10,899

 

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

Total discontinued operations

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

11,424

 

25,038

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

41,994

 

3,628

 

2,447

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

(1,755

)

(665

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUBESMART L.P.

 

42,036

 

1,710

 

(363

)

(7,774

)

(997

)

Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

(588

)

107

 

(35

)

381

 

60

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO OPERATING PARTNER

 

41,448

 

1,817

 

(398

)

(7,393

)

(937

)

Distribution to preferred unitholders

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.19

)

$

(0.34

)

Basic earnings per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.33

 

Basic earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.19

)

$

(0.34

)

Diluted earnings per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.33

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic units outstanding (1)

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

Weighted-average diluted units outstanding (1)

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

$

(18,223

)

$

(23,947

)

Total discontinued operations

 

31,048

 

16,498

 

15,118

 

10,830

 

23,010

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

41



Table of Contents

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

2,155,170

 

$

2,089,707

 

$

1,788,720

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

Total assets

 

2,358,624

 

2,150,319

 

1,875,979

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

500,000

 

250,000

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

38,600

 

45,000

 

 

43,000

 

 

Unsecured term loans

 

400,000

 

500,000

 

400,000

 

200,000

 

 

Secured term loan

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

200,218

 

228,759

 

358,441

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

Total liabilities

 

1,229,142

 

1,112,420

 

830,925

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

36,275

 

47,990

 

49,732

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

Total CubeSmart L.P. Capital

 

1,092,276

 

989,791

 

955,913

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

931

 

118

 

39,409

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

Total liabilities and capital

 

2,358,624

 

2,150,319

 

1,875,979

 

1,478,819

 

1,598,870

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of facilities

 

366

 

381

 

370

 

363

 

367

 

Total rentable square feet (in thousands)

 

24,662

 

25,485

 

24,420

 

23,635

 

23,749

 

Occupancy percentage

 

88.3

%

84.4

%

78.4

%

76.3

%

75.2

%

Cash dividends declared per unit (2)

 

$

0.460

 

$

0.350

 

$

0.290

 

$

0.145

 

$

0.100

 


(1)Excludes Operating Partnership units issued at our IPO and in connection with the acquisition of facilities subsequent to our IPO.  Operating Partnership units have been excluded from the earnings per share calculations as the related income or loss is presented in Operating Partnership interest of third parties.

 

35(2)We announced full quarterly dividends of $0.025 per common share on February 25, 2009, May 26, 2009, August 5, 2009, December 10, 2009, February 24, 2010, June 2, 2010, and August 4, 2010; dividends of $0.070 per common share on December 14, 2010, February 23, 2011,  June 1, 2011, and August 3, 2011; dividends of $0.080 and $0.393 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 8, 2011; dividends of $0.080 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on February 21, 2012, May 30, 2012 and August 1, 2012; dividends of $0.110 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 10, 2012, February 21, 2013, May 29, 2013, and August 7, 2013, and dividends of $0.130 and $0.484 per common and preferred shares, respectively, on December 19, 2013.

42



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION ANDRESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statementsand notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.  The Company makes certainReport.  Some of the statements we make in this section that are forward-looking statements within the meaning ofthe federal securities laws.  For a complete discussion of forward-looking statements,see the section in this reportReport entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.”  Certain riskfactors may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materiallyfrom those expressed or implied by the following discussion.  For a discussion of suchrisk factors, see the section in this reportReport entitled “Risk Factors.”

 

Overview

 

The Company isWe are an integrated self-storage real estate company, which means that it hasand as such we have in-house capabilities in the operation, design, development, leasing, management and acquisition of self-storage facilities.  The Parent Company’s operations are conducted solely through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries.  The Parent Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  AtAs of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,December 31, 2012, the Company owned 363366 and 367381 self-storage facilities, respectively, totaling approximately 23.6 million and 23.724.7 million rentable square feet and 25.5 million rentable square feet, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013, we owned facilities in the District of Columbia and the following 20 states:  Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia.  In addition, as of December 31, 2010, the Company2013, we managed 93 properties160 facilities for third parties bringing the total number of properties which itfacilities we owned and/or managed to 456.526.  As of December 31, 2013, we managed facilities for third parties in the following 23 states: Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

 

The Company derivesIn addition, as of December 31, 2013, we owned an economic interest in one unconsolidated real estate venture that owned 35 self-storage facilities located in Texas (34) and North Carolina (1), containing an aggregate of approximately 2.4 million rentable square feet.

We derive revenues principally from rents received from its customers who rent unitscubes at itsour self-storage facilities under month-to-month leases.  Therefore, our operating results depend materially on our ability to retain our existing customers and lease our available self-storage unitscubes to new customers while maintaining and, where possible, increasing our pricing levels.  In addition, our operating results depend on the ability of our customers to make required rental payments to us.  We have a decentralizedOur approach to the management and operation of our facilities which places an emphasis oncombines centralized marketing, revenue management and other operational support with local market leveloperations teams that provide market-level oversight and control.  We believe this approach allows us to respond quickly and effectively to changes in local market conditions, and to maximize revenues by managing rental rates and occupancy levels.

 

The CompanyWe typically experiences seasonal fluctuations in the occupancy levels of our facilities, which are generally slightly higher during the summer months due to increased moving activity.

 

The United States has recently experiencedcontinues to recover from an economic downturn that has resulted in higher unemployment, stagnant employment growth, shrinking demand for products, large-scale business failures and tight credit markets.  Our results of operations may be sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending, as well as to increased bad debts due to recessionary pressures.  A continuation of — or slow recovery from — ongoing adverse economic conditions affecting disposable consumer income, such as employment levels, business conditions, interest rates, tax rates, fuel and energy costs, and other matters could reduce consumer spending or cause consumers to shift their spending to other products and services.  A general reduction in the level of discretionary spending or shifts in consumer discretionary spending could adversely affect our growth and profitability.

 

In the future, the Company intends toWe continue our focus on maximizing internal growth opportunities and selectively pursuing targeted acquisitions and developments of self-storage facilities.  We intend to incur additional debt in connection with any such future acquisitions or developments.

 

The Company hasWe have one reportable segment:  we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.

 

The Company’s43



Table of Contents

Our self-storage facilities are located in major metropolitan and rural areas and have numerous tenantscustomers per facility.  No single tenantcustomer represents a significant concentration of our revenues.  TheOur facilities in New York, Florida, California, Texas, and IllinoisCalifornia provided approximately 18%17%, 15%, 10% and 7%9%, respectively, of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010.2013.

 

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report.Report.  Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report.Report.  A summary of significant accounting policies is also provided in the notes to our consolidated financial statements (See Notenote 2 to the consolidated

36



Table of Contents

financial statements).  These policies require the application of judgment and assumptions by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.  Due to this uncertainty, actual results could differ materially from estimates calculated and utilized by management.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company, and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries.  The portion of these entities not owned by the Company is presented as noncontrolling interests as of and during the periods presented.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) on the consolidation of VIEs.  When an entity is not deemed to be a VIE, the Company considers the provisions of additional FASB guidance to determine whether a general partner, or the general partners as a group, controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights.  The Company consolidates (i) entities that are VIEs and of which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs which the Company control scontrols and in which the limited partners do not have substantive participating rights, or the ability to dissolve the entity or remove the Company without cause nor substantive participating rights.cause.

For analytical presentation, all percentages are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Self-Storage Facilities

 

The Company records self-storage facilities at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation on the buildings and equipment is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 4039 years. Expenditures for significant renovations or improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized.  Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

 

When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values.  When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities based upon an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.  Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

 

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities.  The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to an intangible asset attributed to the value of in-place leases.  This intangible is generally amortized to expense over the expected remaining term of the respective leases.  Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts.  Accordingly, to date no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to above- or below-market lease intangibles.  To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenantcustomer relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant tenantscustomers and the average tenantcustomer turnover is fairly frequent.

During 2008, the Company acquired a self storage facility and allocated approximately $1.0 million to the intangible value of the in-place leases.  This asset represents the value of in-place leases at the time of acquisition and was fully amortized at December 31, 2009.

On April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which includes the intangible value related to the management contracts as other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  The average estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.9 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States.   In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.  The estimated life of these in-place leases is 12 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.7 million.

37



Table of Contents

 

Long-lived assets classified as “held for use” are reviewed for impairment when events and circumstances such as declines in occupancy and operating results indicate that there may be impairment.  The carrying value of these long-lived assets is compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets to determine if the property’sfacility’s basis is recoverable.  If a property’sfacility’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value.  The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.  There were no impairment losses recognized in accordance with these procedures during 2010, 2009 and 2008.

44



Table of Contents

 

The Company considers long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

 

Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant asset is under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing.  In most transactions, these contingencies are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; accordingly, the facility is not identified as held for sale until the closing actually occurs. However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances.  PropertiesFacilities classified as held for sale are reported at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Management has determined that all our leases with tenantscustomers are operating leases.  Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the lease agreements or contracts, which generally are month-to-month.

 

The Company recognizes gains onfrom disposition of propertiesfacilities only upon closing in accordance with the guidance on sales of real estate.  Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits.  Profit on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured and the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale.  Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of profit recognition on sales under this guidance.

 

Share Based Payments

 

We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our equity incentive plans.  Accordingly, share compensation expense was recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options.  The Company has elected to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period.

Noncontrolling Interests

 

Noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests.  In accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity,equity/capital, separately from the Parent Company’s equity.equity/capital.  The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests are adjusted each period so that the carrying value equals the greater of its carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or its redemption value.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Parent Company and noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equityequity/capital activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, i ncludingincluding beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity,equity/capital, noncontrolling interests and total equity.equity/capital.

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures

The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures under the equity method of accounting.  Under the equity method, investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are recorded initially at cost, as investments in real estate entities, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings (losses), cash contributions, less distributions and impairments. On a periodic basis, management also assesses whether there are any indicators that the fair value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated real estate entities may be other than temporarily impaired. An investment is impaired only if the fair value of the investment, as estimated by management, is less than the carrying value of the investment and the decline is other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment, as estimated by management. The determination as to whether impairment exists requires significant management judgment about the fair value of its ownership interest. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third party appraisals.

 

3845



Table of Contents

 

Income Taxes

 

The Parent Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code beginning with the period from October 21, 2004 (commencement of operations) through December 31, 2004.  In management’s opinion, the requirements to maintain these elections are being met.  Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements other than for operations conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

 

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and the allocation of net income and loss for financial versus tax reporting purposes.

 

The Parent Company is subject to a 4% federal excise tax if sufficient taxable income is not distributed within prescribed time limits.  The excise tax equals 4% of the annual amount, if any, by which the sum of (a) 85% of the Parent Company’s ordinary income, and (b) 95% of the Parent Company’s net capital gaingains, and c) 100% of prior year taxable income exceeds cash distributions and certain taxes paid by the Parent Company.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

TheIn February 2013, the FASB issued authoritative guidance onan amendment to the accounting standard for transfersthe reporting of financial assetsin June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  The guidanceamendment requires entities to provide more information regarding salesdisclose for items reclassified out of securitized financial assetsAOCI and similar transactions, particularly ifinto net income in their entirety, the entity has continuing exposureeffect of the reclassification on each affected income statement line item and for AOCI items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income, a cross reference to the risks related to transferred financial assets.  It also eliminates the conceptother required GAAP disclosures.  This amendment became effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.  The applicationthis guidance in 2013 did not have ana material impact on ourthe Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations or cash flows.as its impact was limited to disclosure requirements (see note 9).

 

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.  The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement.  The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial posit ion, results of operations or cash flows.

Results of Operations

 

The following discussion of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto.  Historical results set forth in the consolidated statements of operations reflect only the existing facilities and should not be taken as indicative of future operations.  The Company considers itsWe consider our same-store portfolio to consist of only those facilities owned and operated on a stabilized basis at the beginning and at the end of the applicable years presented. Same-storeWe consider a facility to be stabilized once it has achieved an occupancy rate that we believe, based on our assessment of market-specific data, is representative of similar self-storage assets in the applicable market for a full year measured as of the most recent January 1 and has not been significantly damaged by natural disaster or undergone significant renovation.  We believe that same-store results are considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance because it providesthey provide information relating to changes in facility-level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions, developments or dispositions.  At December 31, 2013, we owned 298 same-store facilities and 68 non same-store facilities, of which 37 were 2012 acquisitions, 20 were 2013 acquisitions and 11 were facilities that were not stabilized, either because the facilities had not achieved the requisite occupancy rates or had been damaged by natural disaster or had undergone significant renovation.  For analytical presentation, all percentages are calculated using the numbers presented in the financial statements contained in this Report.

 

The Company’sOur results of operations are affected by the acquisition and disposition activity during the 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011 periods as listeddescribed below.  At December 31, 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 2008, the Company2011, we owned 363, 367,366, 381, and 387370 self-storage facilities and related assets, respectively.

 

·                  In 2010, 122013, we acquired 20 self-storage facilities were acquired for approximately $85.1$189.8 million (the “2010“2013 Acquisitions”) and 16we sold 35 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $38.1$126.4 million (the “2010“2013 Dispositions”).

46



Table of Contents

·In 2012, we acquired 37 self-storage facilities for approximately $432.3 million (the “2012 Acquisitions”) and we sold 26 self-storage facilities for approximately $60.0 million (the “2012 Dispositions”).

 

·                  In 2009, 202011, we acquired 27 self-storage facilities were sold for approximately $90.9$467.1 million (the “2009“2011 Acquisitions”) and we sold 19 self-storage facilities for approximately $45.2 million (the “2011 Dispositions”).

 

·Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the Year Ended December 31, 2012 (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

221,015

 

$

207,416

 

$

13,599

 

7

%

$

60,235

 

$

28,744

 

$

 

$

 

$

281,250

 

$

236,160

 

$

45,090

 

19

%

Other property related income

 

23,780

 

20,575

 

3,205

 

16

%

5,993

 

3,274

 

2,592

 

1,972

 

32,365

 

25,821

 

6,544

 

25

%

Property management fee income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

439

 

10

%

Total revenues

 

244,795

 

227,991

 

16,804

 

7

%

66,228

 

32,018

 

7,372

 

6,313

 

318,395

 

266,322

 

52,073

 

20

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

80,903

 

78,045

 

2,858

 

4

%

23,015

 

11,599

 

14,304

 

13,844

 

118,222

 

103,488

 

14,734

 

14

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

163,892

 

149,946

 

13,946

 

9

%

43,213

 

20,419

 

(6,932

)

(7,531

)

200,173

 

162,834

 

37,339

 

23

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property count

 

298

 

298

 

 

 

 

 

68

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

366

 

346

 

 

 

 

 

Total square footage

 

19,801

 

19,801

 

 

 

 

 

4,861

 

3,365

 

 

 

 

 

24,662

 

23,166

 

 

 

 

 

Period End Occupancy (1)

 

88.9

%

85.1

%

 

 

 

 

85.6

%

82.4

%

 

 

 

 

88.3

%

84.7

%

 

 

 

 

Period Average Occupancy (2)

 

88.4

%

83.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized annual rent per occupied sq ft (3)

 

$

12.62

 

$

12.61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,313

 

109,830

 

2,483

 

2

%

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,563

 

26,131

 

3,432

 

13

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

141,876

 

135,961

 

5,915

 

4

%

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,297

 

26,873

 

31,424

 

117

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (expense) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(40,424

)

(40,318

)

106

 

0

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,058

)

(3,279

)

1,221

 

37

%

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(414

)

 

(414

)

-100

%

Acquisition related costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,849

)

(3,086

)

(763

)

-25

%

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(406

)

-54

%

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,023

 

(7,023

)

-100

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

256

 

(248

)

-97

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(47,888

)

(40,149

)

7,739

)

-19

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,409

 

(13,276

)

23,685

 

178

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,145

 

7,093

 

(2,948

)

-42

%

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

17,629

 

180

%

Total discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

14,681

 

87

%

NET INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,994

 

3,628

 

38,366

 

1057

%

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(588

)

107

 

(695

)

-650

%

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

 

(1,918

)

1,960

 

102

%

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

41,448

 

$

1,817

 

$

39,631

 

2181

%

Distribution to preferred shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

 

0

%

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

39,631

 

-946

%


(1)             In 2008, one self-storage facility was acquiredRepresents occupancy at December 31 of the respective year.

(2)Represents the weighted average occupancy for approximately $13.3 million (the “2008 Acquisition”) and 23 self-storage facilities were soldthe period.

(3)Realized annual rent per occupied square foot is computed by dividing rental income by the weighted average occupied square feet for approximately $62.0 million (the “2008 Dispositions”).the period.

 

39Revenues

Rental income increased from $236.2 million in 2012 to $281.3 million in 2013, an increase of $45.1 million, or 19%. This increase is primarily attributable to $31.5 million of additional income from the facilities acquired in 2012 and 2013 and an increase in average occupancy on the same-store portfolio which contributed to the $13.6 million increase in rental income during 2013 as compared to 2012.

47



Table of Contents

Other property related income consists of late fees, administrative charges, tenant insurance commissions, sales of storage supplies and other ancillary revenues.  Other property related income increased from $25.8 million in 2012 to $32.4 million in 2013, an increase of $6.6 million, or 25%.  This increase is primarily attributable to increased fee revenue and insurance commissions of $6.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, driven by a $3.2 million increase in same-store property related income mainly attributable to increased insurance penetration and higher commission percentages.  Additionally, the 2012 and 2013 acquisitions contributed $2.7 million to the increase in other property related income.

Property management fee income increased to $4.8 million in 2013 from $4.3 million during 2012, an increase of $0.5 million, or 10%.  This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third-party management business (160 facilities as of December 31, 2013 compared to 133 facilities as of December 31, 2012).

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses increased from $103.5 million in 2012 to $118.2 million in 2013, an increase of $14.7 million, or 14%.  This increase is primarily attributable to $11.4 million of increased expenses associated with newly acquired facilities in 2013 and 2012.  Additionally, property operating expenses on the same-store portfolio increased $2.9 million primarily due to an increase of $1.9 million in property taxes and $1.1 million in payroll related expenses.

General and administrative

General and administrative expenses increased from $26.1 million for the year ending December 31, 2012 to $29.6 million for the year ending December 31, 2013, an increase of $3.5 million, or 13%.  The increase in primarily attributable to $1.5 million in additional share based compensation expense and $1.1 million in additional payroll expenses.

Other (expense) income

Interest expense increased from $40.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2012 to $40.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $0.1 million.  The increase is attributable to a lower weighted average interest rate, offset by a higher amount of outstanding debt in 2013. The weighted average effective interest rate of our outstanding debt decreased from 4.31% for the year ended December 31, 2012 to 3.93% for the year ended December 31, 2013 as a result of the repayment of certain secured indebtedness and amendments to our Term Loan Facility and Credit Facility that reduced our borrowing costs.

Loan procurement amortization expense decreased from $3.3 million during 2012 to $2.1 million during 2013, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 37%. This decrease is the result of lower amortization expense on loan procurement costs related to several fixed-rate mortgages that were repaid during 2012 and 2013.

Loan procurement amortization expense — early repayment of debt was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 due to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with $100 million of our Term Loan Facility.  There was no corresponding transaction during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture was $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, with no comparable gains during 2013.  In 2012, the Company purchased the remaining 50% ownership in a consolidated joint venture.  As a result of the transaction, the Company remeasured its original 50% interest and recorded a gain of approximately $7.0 million, which is reflected in Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture.

Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations decreased from $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The income during the 2013 period represents the results of operations during the year for the 35 assets sold during 2013 for the period the assets were owned by the Company.  Income during the 2012 period represents the results of operations during the year for the 35 assets sold during 2013 and the 26 assets sold during 2012 for the period the assets were owned by the Company.  Gains from disposition of discontinued operations increased from $9.8 million during 2012 to $27.4 million during 2013.  These gains are determined on a transactional basis and accordingly are not comparable across reporting periods.

48



Table of Contents

 

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20102012 to the Year Ended December 31, 20092011 (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

2010

 

2009

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

192,739

 

$

193,383

 

$

(644

)

0

%

$

2,618

 

$

1,207

 

$

 

$

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

767

 

0

%

 

$

182,172

 

$

177,109

 

$

5,063

 

3

%

$

53,988

 

$

11,140

 

$

 

$

 

$

236,160

 

$

188,249

 

$

47,911

 

25

%

Other property related income

 

16,854

 

15,654

 

1,200

 

8

%

1,190

 

432

 

596

 

 

18,640

 

16,086

 

2,554

 

16

%

 

18,427

 

16,127

 

2,300

 

14

%

5,421

 

1,270

 

1,972

 

1,590

 

25,820

 

18,987

 

6,833

 

36

%

Property management fee income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,829

 

56

 

2,829

 

56

 

2,773

 

4952

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

573

 

15

%

Total revenues

 

209,593

 

209,037

 

556

 

0

%

3,808

 

1,639

 

3,425

 

56

 

216,826

 

210,732

 

6,094

 

3

%

 

200,599

 

193,236

 

7,363

 

4

%

59,409

 

12,410

 

6,313

 

5,358

 

266,321

 

211,004

 

55,317

 

26

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

82,179

 

82,835

 

(656

)

-1

%

2,258

 

972

 

9,259

 

7,573

 

93,696

 

91,380

 

2,316

 

3

%

 

70,369

 

70,684

 

(315

)

0

%

19,275

 

4,864

 

13,843

 

12,022

 

103,487

 

87,570

 

15,917

 

18

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

127,414

 

126,202

 

1,212

 

1

%

1,550

 

667

 

(5,834

)

(7,517

)

123,130

 

119,352

 

3,778

 

3

%

 

130,230

 

122,552

 

7,678

 

6

%

40,134

 

7,546

 

(7,530

)

(6,664

)

162,834

 

123,434

 

39,400

 

32

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property count

 

279

 

279

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

346

 

309

 

 

 

 

 

Total square footage

 

18,475

 

18,475

 

 

 

 

 

4,708

 

2,061

 

 

 

 

 

23,183

 

20,537

 

 

 

 

 

Period End Occupancy (1)

 

84.9

%

79.4

%

 

 

 

 

83.6

%

77.6

%

 

 

 

 

84.6

%

79.3

%

 

 

 

 

Period Average Occupancy (2)

 

82.9

%

79.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized annual rent per occupied sq ft (3)

 

$

11.89

 

$

12.05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

62,945

 

69,125

 

(6,180

)

-9

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

109,830

 

61,972

 

47,858

 

77

%

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25,406

 

22,569

 

2,837

 

13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,131

 

24,693

 

1,438

 

6

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88,351

 

91,694

 

(3,343

)

-4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

135,961

 

86,665

 

49,296

 

57

%

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

34,779

 

27,658

 

7,121

 

26

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,873

 

36,769

 

(9,896

)

-27

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (expense) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(37,794

)

(45,269

)

7,475

 

-17

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(40,318

)

(32,787

)

(7,531

)

-23

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,463

)

(2,339

)

(4,124

)

176

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,279

)

(5,028

)

1,749

 

35

%

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

621

 

681

 

(60

)

-9

%

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,167

)

8,167

 

100

%

Acquisition related costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(759

)

 

(759

)

100

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,086

)

(3,823

)

737

 

19

%

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(745

)

(281

)

(464

)

-165

%

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,023

 

 

7,023

 

100

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(235

)

(33

)

(202

)

612

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

256

 

(83

)

339

 

408

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(44,630

)

(46,960

)

2,330

 

-5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(40,149

)

(50,169

)

10,020

 

20

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9,851

)

(19,302

)

9,451

 

49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13,276

)

(13,400

)

124

 

1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

(2,825

)

-58

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,093

 

11,944

 

(4,851

)

-41

%

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

(12,313

)

-87

%

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

5,908

 

151

%

Total discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

(15,138

)

-80

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

1,057

 

7

%

NET LOSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,019

)

(332

)

(5,687

)

-1713

%

NET INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,628

 

2,447

 

1,181

 

48

%

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

381

 

60

 

321

 

535

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107

 

(35

)

142

 

406

%

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

(1,090

)

-164

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

892

 

32

%

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

(6,456

)

-689

%

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,817

 

$

(398

)

$

2,215

 

557

%

Distribution to preferred shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

(4,790

)

-393

%

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

$

(2,575

)

-159

%


(1)Represents occupancy at December 31 of the respective year.

(2)Represents the weighted average occupancy for the period.

(3)Realized annual rent per occupied square foot is computed by dividing rental income by the weighted average occupied square feet for the period.

Revenues

 

Rental income increased from $194.6$188.2 million in 20092011 to $195.4$236.2 million in 2010,2012, an increase of $0.8 million.$48.0 million, or 25%. This increase is primarily attributable to $42.9 million of additional income from the 2010 acquisitions of approximately $1.6facilities acquired in 2011 and 2012 and a $5.1 million in 2010 with no similar incomethe same-store portfolio.  The increase in 2009,the same-store portfolio is primarily related to increased occupancy levels offset by a decrease in the realized annual rent per square foot of 1% related to the same-store property portfolio which resulted in a $0.6 million decrease in same-store rental income.lower asking rents.

 

Other property related income increased from $16.1$19.0 million in 20092011 to $18.6$25.8 million in 2010,2012, an increase of $2.5$6.8 million, or 16%36%.  This increase is primarily attributable to increased fee revenue and insurance commissions related toof $4.2 million on the facilities acquired in 2011 and 2012 and a $2.3 million increase in fee revenue and insurance commissions as a result of higher occupancy on the same-store properties of $1.3 million and an increase in other property related income of $1.4 million related to the 2010 Acquisitions and other non-same store revenue during 2010 as compared to 2009.portfolio.

 

Property management fee income increased to $2.8$4.3 million in 20102012 from $56,000$3.8 million during 2009,2011, an increase of $2.8 million.$0.5 million, or 15%.  This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business which included 93(133 facilities as of December 31, 20102012 compared to eight103 facilities as of December 31, 2009.2011).

 

49



Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

 

Property operating expenses increased from $91.4$87.6 million in 20092011 to $93.7$103.5 million in 2010,2012, an increase of $2.3$15.9 million, or 3%18%.  This increase is primarily attributable to $1.3$14.4 million of increased expenses associated with non same-store propertiesnewly acquired facilities and additional$1.8 million of increased costs incurred to supportmanage the growth of the third party management business, offset by a $0.7 million decrease in same-store expenses primarily attributable to a $0.5 million decrease in real estate tax expense in the 2010 as compared to 2009.

40



Table of Contentstotal portfolio.

 

Depreciation and amortization decreasedincreased from $69.1$62.0 million in 20092011 to $62.9$109.8 million in 2010, a decrease of $6.2 million, or 9%.  This decrease is primarily attributable to depreciation expense recognized in 2009 related to assets that became fully depreciated during 2009, with no similar activity on these fully depreciated assets in 2010.

General and administrative expenses increased from $22.6 million in 2009 to $25.4 million in 2010,2012, an increase of $2.8$47.9 million, or 13%77%.  This increase is primarily attributable to costsdepreciation and amortization expense related to additional personnel coststhe 2011 and 2012 acquisitions, including an increase in amortization of lease intangibles of $25.2 million recognized during 2010 to support operational functions of the Company as well as non-recurring contract related costs incurred in conjunction with amendments to employment agreements with members of our senior management.2012 period.

Other Income (Expenses)(expense) income

 

Interest expense decreasedincreased from $45.3$32.8 million in 20092011 to $37.8$40.3 million in 2010, a decrease2012, an increase of $7.5 million, or 17%23%Approximately $3.9 million ofThe increase is attributable to higher average outstanding debt during 2012 primarily resulting from debt associated with the reducedStorage Deluxe acquisition and other 2012 acquisitions.  This increase was offset by lower interest expense related to $175 millionthe repayment of net mortgage loan repaymentsseveral fixed-rate mortgages during the periodyear.  These repayments utilized proceeds from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010.   Interest expense also decreased by approximately $3.6 million as a resultthe unsecured senior note offering in 2012 and had higher effective rates than the effective interest rate of reduced average outstanding credit facility borrowings and lower interest rates during 2010 as compared to 2009.the senior notes.

 

Loan procurement amortization expense increased from $2.3was $3.3 million in 2009for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $6.5$13.2 million in 2010, an increase of $4.2 million, or 176%.  The increasefor the year ended December 31, 2011.  This decrease is attributable to the amortization of additional costs incurred in relation to the amendment of the credit facility in 2010, and a full year of amortization of costs related to the creditwrite-off of unamortized loan procurement costs associated with our prior facility and the 17 secured financings entered intowhich was replaced in 2009.its entirety in December of 2011.

 

Acquisition related costs increased $0.8Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture was $7.0 million during 2010for the year ended December 31, 2012, with no comparable costs in 2009 as a result ofgains during the acquisition of 12 self-storage facilities, in addition to the acquisition of 85 management contracts from United Stor-All, during 2010, compared to no acquisition activity during 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Gains on disposition of discontinued operations decreased from $14.1 million in the 2009 period to $1.8 million in the 2010 period, a decrease of $12.3 million. Gains during 20092011 period.  This gain is related to the saleinterest remeasurement from the purchase of the 20 assets sold during 2009, and gains during 2010 related to the 16 assets sold during 2010.

Noncontrolling Interestsremaining 50% ownership in Subsidiaries

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries increased to $1.8 million in the 2010 period from $0.7 million in the 2009 period.  This increase is primarily a result of a full year of activity related to the operations of aconsolidated joint venture (“HART”), which was formed in August 2009 to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities.  The Company retained a 50% ownership interest in HART and accordingly presents the 50% of the related results that are allocated to the venture partner as an adjustment to net income (loss) when arriving at net income (loss) attributable to shareholders.

41



Table of Contents

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 to the Year Ended December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non Same-Store

 

Other/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Same-Store Property Portfolio

 

Properties

 

Eliminations

 

Total Portfolio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

(Decrease)

 

Change

 

REVENUES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

 

190,343

 

$

198,659

 

$

(8,316

)

-4

%

$

 

4,247

 

$

3,541

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

$

(7,610

)

-4

%

Other property related income

 

15,362

 

14,773

 

589

 

4

%

724

 

357

 

 

 

16,086

 

15,130

 

956

 

6

%

Property management fee income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

56

 

 

56

 

 

56

 

100

%

Total revenues

 

205,705

 

213,432

 

(7,727

)

-4

%

4,971

 

3,898

 

56

 

 

210,732

 

217,330

 

(6,598

)

-3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

81,432

 

82,486

 

(1,054

)

-1

%

2,405

 

2,064

 

7,543

 

7,983

 

91,380

 

92,533

 

(1,153

)

-1

%

NET OPERATING INCOME:

 

124,273

 

130,946

 

(6,673

)

-5

%

2,566

 

1,834

 

(7,487

)

(7,983

)

119,352

 

124,797

 

(5,445

)

-4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,125

 

71,974

 

(2,849

)

-4

%

General and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,569

 

24,964

 

(2,395

)

-10

%

Subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

91,694

 

96,938

 

(5,244

)

-5

%

Operating income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,658

 

27,859

 

(201

)

-1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(45,269

)

(52,014

)

6,745

 

-13

%

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,339

)

(1,929

)

(410

)

21

%

Interest income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

681

 

153

 

528

 

345

%

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(33

)

94

 

(127

)

-135

%

Total other expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(46,960

)

(53,696

)

6,736

 

-13

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,302

)

(25,837

)

6,535

 

25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

(4,388

)

-48

%

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

(5,581

)

-28

%

Total discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

(9,969

)

-34

%

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(332

)

3,102

 

(3,434

)

-111

%

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

(310

)

370

 

119

%

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(665

)

 

(665

)

-100

%

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

$

(3,729

)

-134

%

Revenues

Rental income decreased from $202.2 million in 2008 to $194.6 million in 2009, a decrease of $7.6 million, or 4%.  This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of rental income from the same-store properties of $8.3 million due to decreased realized rent per occupied square foot of 4.9% during 2009 as compared to 2008, offset by an increase in rental income of $0.7 million from non same-store properties.

Other property related income increased from $15.1 million in 2008 to $16.1 million in 2009, an increase of $1.0 million, or 6%.  This increase is primarily attributable to increased insurance commissions and merchandise sales of $1.0 million across the portfolio of storage facilities during 2009 as compared to 2008.

Property management fee income increased to $56,000 during 2009 with no comparable income during 2008.  This increase is attributable to an increase in management fees related to the third party management business, which began in 2009 and included eight facilities as of December 31, 2009.

Operating Expenses

Property operating expenses decreased from $92.5 million in 2008 to $91.4 million in 2009, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 1%.  $1.1 million of the decrease is attributable to a same-store expense decline primarily related to a $0.4 million decrease in repairs and maintenance expense and a $0.4 million decrease in utility expenses.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from $72.0 million in 2008 to $69.1 million in 2009, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 4%.  The decrease is primarily attributable to amortization expense of $6.8 million incurred during 2008 related to two in-place lease intangible assets acquired in conjunction with property acquisitions during 2008 and 2007, with

42



Table of Contents

no similar activity during 2009; offset by additional depreciation expense during 2009 of $3.9 million as compared to 2008 related to capital improvements during 2008 and 2009.

General and administrative expenses decreased from $25.0 million in 2008 to $22.6 million in 2009, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 10%.  This decrease is primarily attributable to $2.1 million in severance related costs incurred during 2008 that the Company did not incur during 2009.

Other Income (Expenses)

Interest expense decreased from $52.0 million in 2008 to $45.3 million in 2009, a decrease of $6.7 million, or 13%.  The decrease is attributable to lower interest rates on borrowings under the Company’s bank term loan and credit facility as well as lower outstanding borrowings on the credit facility during 2009 as compared to 2008.

Loan procurement amortization expense increased from $1.9 million in 2008 to $2.3 million in 2009, an increase of $0.4 million, or 21%.  The increase is attributable to additional costs incurred in relation to the company’s new credit facility and 17 secured financings entered into in 2009.

Interest income increased to $0.7 million in 2009 from $0.2 million in 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to interest income earned on proceeds from the secondary offering completed in August 2009.2012.

 

Discontinued Operations

 

Gains onfrom disposition of discontinued operations decreasedincreased from $19.7$3.9 million in 2008the 2011 period to $14.1$9.8 million in 2009, a decreasethe 2012 period, an increase of $5.6$5.9 million, as a result ofor 151%. Gains during 2011 related to the sale of 2319 assets, while gains during 2012 related to the 2008 period as compared to 20 asset sales during the 2009 period.sale of 26 assets.

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

NOI

 

We define net operating income, which we refer to as “NOI,” as total continuing revenues less continuing property operating expenses.  NOI also can be calculated by adding back to net income (loss): interest expense on loans, loan procurement amortization expense, loan procurement amortization expense — early repayment of debt, acquisition related costs, equity in losses of real estate ventures, amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests, other expense, depreciation and amortization expense, lease abandonment charge, and general and administrative expense;expense, and deducting from net income: income from discontinued operations, gains on disposition of discontinued operations, other income, gains from remeasurement of investments in real estate venture and interest income.  NOI is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP.

 

We use NOI as a measure of operating performance at each of our facilities, and for all of our facilities in the aggregate. NOI should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows provided by operating, investing and financing activities, or other income statement or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

50



Table of Contents

 

We believe NOI is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because:

 

·         It is one of the primary measures used by our management and our facility managers to evaluate the economic productivity of our facilities, including our ability to lease our facilities, increase pricing and occupancy and control our property operating expenses;

 

·         It is widely used in the real estate industry and the self-storage industry to measure the performance and value of real estate assets without regard to various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, such as depreciation and amortization, which can vary depending upon accounting methods and the book value of assets; and

 

·         We believe it helps our investors to meaningfully compare the results of our operating performance from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense on our outstanding indebtedness) and depreciation of our basis in our assets from our operating results.

 

43



Table of Contents

There are material limitations to using a measure such as NOI, including the difficulty associated with comparing results among more than one company and the inability to analyze certain significant items, including depreciation and interest expense, that directly affect our net income.  We compensate for these limitations by considering the economic effect of the excluded expense items independently as well as in connection with our analysis of net income.  NOI should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP, such as total revenues, operating income and net income.

FFO

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a widely used performance measure for real estate companies and is provided here as a supplemental measure of operating performance.  The April 2002 National Policy Bulletin of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (the “White Paper”), as amended, defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate and related impairment charges, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

Management uses FFO as a key performance indicator in evaluating the operations of our facilities. Given the nature of our business as a real estate owner and operator, we consider FFO a key measure of our operating performance that is not specifically defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.  We believe that FFO is useful to management and investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance because FFO excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to or are not indicative of our operating performance such as gains (or losses) from sales of real estate, gains on remeasurement of investments in real estate ventures, impairments of depreciable assets, and depreciation, which can make periodic and peer analyses of operating performance more difficult. Our computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs or real estate companies.

FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP and is not a measure of liquidity or an indicator of our ability to make cash distributions. We believe that to further understand our performance, FFO should be compared with our reported net income and considered in addition to cash flows computed in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

FFO, as adjusted

FFO, as adjusted represents FFO as defined above, excluding the effects of acquisition related costs, gains or losses from early extinguishment of debt, and non-recurring items, which we believe are not indicative of the Company’s operating results.  We present FFO, as adjusted because we believe it is a helpful measure in understanding our results of operations insofar as we believe that the items noted above that are included in FFO, but excluded from FFO, as adjusted are not indicative of our ongoing operating results.  We also believe that the analyst community considers our FFO, as adjusted (or similar measures using different terminology) when evaluating us.  Because other REITs or real estate companies may not compute FFO, as adjusted in the same manner as we do, and may use different terminology, our computation of FFO, as adjusted may not be comparable to FFO, as adjusted reported by other REITs or real estate companies.

51



Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to FFO and FFO, as adjusted, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

Real property - continuing operations

 

110,157

 

108,405

 

Real property - discontinued operations

 

2,703

 

5,548

 

Company’s share of unconsolidated real estate ventures

 

1,080

 

1,540

 

Noncontrolling interest’s share of consolidated real estate ventures

 

 

(1,049

)

Gains from sale of real estate

 

(27,440

)

(9,811

)

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

(7,023

)

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

588

 

(107

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO

 

$

122,528

 

$

93,312

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

414

 

 

Acquisition related costs (1)

 

4,170

 

3,086

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO, as adjusted

 

$

127,112

 

$

96,398

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average diluted shares and units outstanding

 

140,051

 

131,021

 


(1)  Acquisition related costs for the year ended December 31, 2013 include $0.3 million of acquisition related costs that are included in the Company’s share of equity in losses of real estate ventures.

 

Cash Flows

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20102013 to the Year Ended December 31, 20092012

 

A comparison of cash flow related to operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

2010

 

2009

 

Change

 

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

2013

 

2012

 

Change

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

71,517

 

$

62,214

 

$

9,303

 

 

$

142,862

 

$

118,428

 

$

24,434

 

Investing activities

 

$

(44,783

)

$

98,852

 

$

(143,635

)

 

$

(282,924

)

$

(271,936

)

$

(10,988

)

Financing activities

 

$

(123,611

)

$

(62,042

)

$

(61,569

)

 

$

138,743

 

$

148,934

 

$

(10,191

)

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the yearyears ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 were $71.5$142.9 million and $62.2$118.4 million, respectively, an increase of $9.3$24.5 million.  The increaseOur increased cash flow from operating activities is primarily relatesattributable to timing differences associated with a $3.2 million increaseour 2012 and 2013 acquisitions and increased net operating income levels on the same-store portfolio in accounts payable and accrued expense activity and a $3.9 million decrease in restricted cash activity during 2010the 2013 period as compared to 2009the 2012 period.

52



Table of Contents

Cash used in investing activities was $282.9 million in 2013 and increased NOI levels$271.9 million in 2012.  Cash used in 2013 relates to the acquisition of 20 facilities in 2013 for an aggregate purchase price of $189.8 million, net of $8.9 million of assumed debt. Cash used to fund these 2013 acquisitions was offset by $123.8 million in net cash proceeds from the disposition of 35 facilities during 2010 asthe year.  Cash used in investing activities in 2013 also reflects our $157.5 million investment in the HHF joint venture, with no similar transaction in 2012.  Cash used in investing activities in 2012 relates to our acquisition of 28 facilities in 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $330.3 million, net of $107.0 million of assumed debt and to our acquisition of nine facilities through our purchase of the equity interest of our partner in the HSREV real estate venture.  Cash used to fund these acquisitions was offset by $52.6 million in net cash proceeds from our disposition of 26 facilities during the year.  This decrease in net investment activity from 2012 to 2013 was offset by cash used for development activities of $54.0 million in 2013, compared to 2009.$4.2 million used for development activities in 2012.

 

Cash provided by (used in) investingfinancing activities decreased from $98.9to $138.7 million in 2009 to ($44.8)2013 from $148.9 million in 2010,2012, a decrease of $143.6$10.2 million. The decrease primarily relates to decreased property dispositionsProceeds from the revolving portion of the Credit Facility and unsecured term loans were $636.2 million in 2010 (aggregate proceeds of $37.3 million related to 16 facilities)2013 compared to 2009 (aggregate$503.0 million during 2012.  This increase in cash proceeds of $68.3 million related to 20 facilities), net proceeds received from the formation of YSI HART Limited Partnership in August 2009 of approximately $48.7 million, with no similar transactions during 2010, as well as higher acquisition activity in 2010 (12 facilities for an aggregate cost of $84.7 million) relative to no acquisitions during 2009.  The decrease was offset by principal payments on the revolving portion of the Credit Facility, unsecured term loans and mortgages that totaled $779.1 million in 2013 compared to $594.3 million in 2012, (with the 2013 payments  including a $100 million repayment of notes receivablea term loan scheduled to mature in 2014. We also received proceeds of $20.1 million during 2010.

Cash used in financing activities increased from $62.0 million in 2009 to $123.6 million in 2010, an increase of $61.6 million. The increase primarily relates to higher common share issuance activity in 2009 compared to 2010 (proceeds of $170.9$247.5 million and $47.6$249.6 million respectively),from our issuance of unsecured senior notes in 2013 and increased distributions paid to shareholders, and non-controlling interests of $5.9 million during 2010 as compared to 2009 due to additional outstanding shares during 2010, offset by decreased net debt repayments of $54.8 million and loan procurement costs of $12.6 million in 2010 as compared to 2009.2012, respectively.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 20092012 to the Year Ended December 31, 20082011

 

A comparison of cash flow related to operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20092012 and 20082011 is as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

Net cash flow provided by (used in):

 

2009

 

2008

 

Change

 

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

2012

 

2011

 

Change

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

62,214

 

$

67,012

 

$

(4,798

)

 

$

118,428

 

$

84,327

 

$

34,101

 

Investing activities

 

$

98,852

 

$

27,177

 

$

71,675

 

 

$

(271,936

)

$

(442,100

)

$

170,164

 

Financing activities

 

$

(62,042

)

$

(94,962

)

$

32,920

 

 

$

148,934

 

$

360,951

 

$

(212,017

)

Cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $118.4 million and $84.3 million, respectively, an increase of $34.1 million.  Our increased cash flow from operating activities is primarily attributable to our 2011 and 2012 acquisitions and increased net operating income levels on the same-store portfolio in the 2012 period as compared to the 2011 period.

Cash used in investing activities was $271.9 million in 2012 and $442.1 million in 2011.  Cash used in 2012 relates to the acquisition of 28 facilities purchased during the year with a purchase price totaling $330.3 million, net of $107.0 million of assumed debt and nine facilities purchased related to the acquisition of the remaining interest in the HSREV real estate venture during 2012.  Cash used to fund these acquisitions was offset by $52.6 million in net cash proceeds from the disposition of 26 facilities during the year.  Cash used in 2011 relates to the acquisition of 27 facilities purchased during the year with a purchase price totaling $467.1 million (which includes 16 Storage Deluxe facilities acquired for $357.3 million).

Cash provided by financing activities decreased to $148.9 million in 2012 from $361.0 million in 2011, a decrease of $212.0 million. During 2012 and 2011, we issued common shares for net proceeds of $102.1 million and $204.0 million, respectively.  Additionally, proceeds from the revolving portion of our Credit Facility and unsecured term loans were $503.0 million in 2012 compared to $656.7 million during 2011, and principal payments on the revolving portion of our Credit Facility, unsecured term loans and mortgages totaled $594.3 million during 2012 compared to $539.0 million during 2011.  These decreases were offset by proceeds received during 2012 relating to the issuance of  unsecured senior notes of $249.6 million.

 

4453



Table of Contents

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $62.2 million and $67.0 million, respectively, a decrease of $4.8 million.  The decrease primarily relates to reduced levels of net operating income in 2009 as compared to 2008 and a $1.0 million decrease in other assets during 2009 as compared to 2008 as a result of the timing of certain payments, offset by a $2.4 million reduction in general and administrative expenses during 2009 as compared to 2008.

Cash provided by investing activities was $98.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and $27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $71.7 million.  The increase primarily relates to increased proceeds from property dispositions of $11.4 million in 2009 as compared to 2008; net proceeds received from the closing of the a joint venture in August 2009 of approximately $48.7 million with no similar transactions during 2008; as well as higher acquisition activity in 2008 (one facility for a purchase price of $13.3 million) relative to 2009 (no facility acquisition activity).

Cash used in financing activities decreased from $95.0 million in 2008 to $62.0 million in 2009, a decrease of $33.0 million.  The decrease relates primarily to increased net debt payoffs of $158.5 million during 2009 as compared to 2008, an increase of $16.1 million in loan procurement costs related to the origination of 17 new secured financings during 2009; and the new secured term loan in December 2009; offset by proceeds of approximately $170.9 million from the issuance of common shares in 2009, and distributions paid to shareholders and unit holders at $0.72 per share in 2008 as compared to similar distributions paid at $0.10 per share during 2009.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Overview

 

Our cash flow from operations has historically been one of our primary sources of liquidity to fund debt service, distributions and capital expenditures.  We derive substantially all of our revenue from customers who lease space from us at our facilities and fees earned from managing facilities.  Therefore, our ability to generate cash from operations is dependent on the rents that we are able to charge and collect from our customers.  We believe that the facilities in which we invest —invest; self-storage facilities, — are less sensitive than other real estate product types to current near-term economic downturns.  However, prolonged economic downturns will adversely affect our cash flows from operations.

 

In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we arethe Parent Company is required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our shareholders on an annual basis or pay federal income tax.  The nature of our business, coupled with the requirement that wethe Parent Company distribute a substantial portion of our income on an annual basis, will cause us to have substantial liquidity needs over both the short-termshort term and the long-term.long term.

 

Our short-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our facilities, refinancing of certain mortgage indebtedness, interest expense and scheduled principal payments on debt, expected distributions to limited partners and shareholders, capital expenditures and recurring capital expenditures.the development of new facilities.  These funding requirements will vary from year to year, in some cases significantly.  WeIn the 2014 fiscal year, we expect recurring capital expenditures in the 2011 fiscal year to be approximately $7 million to $9$11 million and costs associated with the development of new facilities to be approximately $37 million to $41 million.  In addition, ourOur currently scheduled principal payments on debt, including borrowings outstanding on the credit facilityCredit Facility and unsecured term loan,Term Loan Facility, are approximately $8.9$5.2 million in 2011.2014.

 

Our most restrictive debtfinancial covenants limit the amount of additional leverage we can add; however, we believe cash flow from operations, access to equity financing, including through our “at the market” equity program, and access toavailable borrowings under our credit facilityCredit Facility are adequate to executeallow for the execution of our current business plan and remain in compliance with our debt covenants.

 

Our liquidity needs beyond 20112014 consist primarily of contractual obligations which include repayments of indebtedness at maturity, as well as potential discretionary expenditures such as (i) non-recurring capital expenditures; (ii) redevelopment of operating facilities; (iii) acquisitions of additional facilities; and (iv) development of new facilities.  We will have to satisfy the portion of our needs not covered by cash flow from operations through either additional borrowings, including borrowings under our revolving credit facility,Credit Facility, sales of common or preferred shares of the Parent Company and common or preferred units of the Operating Partnership and/or cash generated through facility dispositions and joint venture transactions.

 

Notwithstanding the discussion above, weWe believe that, as a publicly traded REIT, we will have access to multiple sources of capital to fund long-term liquidity requirements, including the incurrence of additional debt and the issuance of additional equity.  However, we cannot provide any assurance that this will be the case.  Our ability to incur additional debt will be dependent on a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing

45



Table of Contents

restrictions that may be imposed by lenders.  In addition, dislocation in the United States debt markets may significantly reduce the availability and increase the cost of long-term debt capital, including conventional mortgage financing and commercial mortgage-backed securities financing.  There can be no assurance that such capital will be readily available in the future.  Our ability to access the equity capital markets will be dependent on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions for REITs and market perceptions about us.

 

Current and Expected Sources of Cash Excluding Credit Facility

As of December 31, 2010,2013, we had approximately $5.9$3.2 million in available cash and cash equivalents.  In addition, we had approximately $207.0$261.2 million of availability for borrowings under our revolving credit facility.Credit Facility.

Unsecured Senior Notes

On December 17, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due December 15, 2023 (the “2023 Senior Notes”) which bear interest at a rate of 4.375%.  On June 26, 2012, the Operating Partnership issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due July 15, 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”) which bear interest at a rate of 4.80%.  The 2023 Senior Notes along with the 2022 Senior Notes are collectively referred to as the “Senior Notes.”  The indenture under which the unsecured Senior Notes were issued restricts the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to incur debt unless the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a leverage ratio not to exceed 60% and an interest coverage ratio of more than 1.5:1 after giving effect to the incurrence of the debt.  The indenture also restricts the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt unless the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 40% after giving effect to the incurrence of the debt.  The indenture also contains other financial and customary covenants, including a covenant not to own unencumbered assets with a value less than 150% of the unsecured indebtedness of the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership is currently in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Senior Notes.

54



Table of Contents

 

Bank Credit Facilities

 

On December 8, 2009,June 20, 2011, we entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “2009 Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million securedan unsecured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility.  The 2009 Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in the 2009 Credit Facility agreement).  The 2009 Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facilityagreement (the “2006 Credit“Term Loan Facility”), which was entered into in November 2006, and consisted of a $200$100 million unsecured term loan with a five-year maturity (“Term Loan A”) and $250a $100 million in unsecured revolving loans.  All borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, we amended the 2009 Credit Facility.  The amended credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan andwith a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility.  The Credit Facility has a three-year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the our leverage levels plus LIBOR.seven-year maturity (“Term Loan B”).  We incurred $2.5costs of $2.1 million of costs in connection with executing this amendment which wasthe agreement and capitalized and is includedsuch costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the our consolidated balance sheet.

 

On December 9, 2011, we entered into a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) comprised of a $100 million unsecured term loan maturing in December 2014 (“Term Loan C”); a $200 million unsecured term loan maturing in March 2017 (“Term Loan D”); and a $300 million unsecured revolving facility maturing in December 2015 (“Revolver”).  We incurred costs of $3.4 million in connection with executing the agreement and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the consolidated balance sheet.

On June 18, 2013, we amended both the Term Loan Facility and Credit Facility.  With respect to the Term Loan Facility, among other things, the amendment extended the maturity and decreased the pricing of Term Loan A, while Term Loan B remained unchanged by the amendment. Pricing on the Term Loan Facility depends on our unsecured debt credit ratings.  At our current Baa3/BBB- level, amounts drawn under Term Loan A are priced at 1.50% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor, while amounts drawn under Term Loan B are priced at 2.00% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor.

 

 

 

 

Term Loan Facility 
Prior to Amendment

 

Term Loan Facility 
As Amended

 

 

 

Amount

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Term Loan A

 

$100 million

 

June 2016

 

1.85

%

June 2018

 

1.50

%

Term Loan B

 

$100 million

 

June 2018

 

2.00

%

June 2018

 

2.00

%

With respect to the Credit Facility, among other things, the amendment extended the maturities of the Revolver and Term Loan D and decreased the pricing of the Revolver, Term Loan C and Term Loan D. Pricing on the Credit Facility depends on our unsecured debt credit ratings. At our current Baa3/BBB- level, amounts drawn under the Revolver are priced at 1.60% over LIBOR, inclusive of a facility fee of 0.30%, with no LIBOR floor, while amounts drawn under Term Loan C and Term Loan D are priced at 1.50% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor.

 

 

 

 

Credit Facility 
Prior to Amendment

 

Credit Facility 
As Amended

 

 

 

Amount

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Revolver

 

$300 million

 

December 2015

 

1.80

%

June 2017

 

1.60

%

Term Loan C (1)

 

$100 million

 

December 2014

 

1.75

%

December 2014

 

1.50

%

Term Loan D

 

$200 million

 

March 2017

 

1.75

%

January 2019

 

1.50

%


(1)On December 17, 2013, the Company repaid the $100 million balance under Term Loan C that was scheduled to mature in December 2014.

We incurred costs of $2.1 million in connection with amending the agreements and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the consolidated balance sheet.  Unamortized costs, along with costs incurred in connection with the amendments, are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the modified facilities.  In connection with the repayment of Term Loan C, we recognized loan procurement amortization expense — early repayment of debt of $0.4 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan procurement costs associated with the term loan.

55



Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, $200.02013, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings and $43.0were outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility, $38.6 million of unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility.  AvailabilityFacility, and $261.2 million was available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving portion of the Credit Facility.  The available balance under the unsecured revolving portion of the Credit Facility is reduced by an outstanding letter of credit facility was $207.0of $0.2 million.  In connection with a portion of the unsecured borrowings, we maintained interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2013 that fixed 30-day LIBOR (see note 10).  As of December 31, 2010,2013, borrowings under the Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility, as amended and after giving effect to the interest rate swaps, had aan effective weighted average interest rate of 3.8%3.22%.

 

The Term Loan Facility and the term loans under our Credit Facility were fully drawn at December 31, 2013 and no further borrowings may be made under the term loans.  Our ability to borrow under the amended creditrevolving facility is subject to our ongoing compliance with the followingcertain financial covenants which include:

 

·         Maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 60.0% at any time;

 

·         Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00; and

 

·         Minimum tangible net worth of $821,211,200 plus 75% of net proceeds from equity issuances after June 30, 2010.

 

Further,In addition, under the Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility, we are restricted from paying distributions on ourthe Parent Company’s common shares that would exceed an amount equal toin excess of the greater of (i) 95% of our funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain ourthe Parent Company’s REIT status.

The indenture under which we have issued unsecured senior notes contains financial covenants which include:

·         Maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 60.0% at any time;

·         Maximum total secured indebtedness to total asset value of 40.0% at any time; and

·         Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00.

 

We are currently in compliance with all of our financial covenants and we anticipate beingremaining in compliance with all of our covenantsfinancial covenants.

At The Market Equity Program

Pursuant to our previous sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “Previous Sales Agent”), dated April 3, 2009, as amended on January 26, 2011 and September 16, 2011 (as amended, the “Previous Sales Agreement”), we had a program to enable us to sell up to 20 million common shares in “at the market” offerings.  On May 7, 2013, we terminated the Previous Sales Agreement with the Previous Sales Agent and entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements (the “Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Wells Fargo Securities LLC; BMO Capital Markets Corp.; Jefferies LLC; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, the “Sales Agents”).  Pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreements, we may sell, from time to time, up to 12 million common shares of beneficial interest through the termSales Agents.

During 2013, we sold a total of 5.7 million common shares under the Credit Facility.agreements at an average sales price of $17.92 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $102.1 million under the program.  We incurred $1.8 million of offering costs in conjunction with the 2013 sales.  We used proceeds from the sales conducted during the year ended December 31, 2013 to fund acquisitions of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.  As of December 31, 2013, 6.4 million common shares remained available for issuance under the Equity Distribution Agreements.

 

4656



Table of Contents

 

Other Material Changes in Financial Position

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

(decrease)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Selected Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

(2,042

)

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

5,891

 

$

102,768

 

$

(96,877

)

Notes receivable, net

 

$

 

$

20,112

 

$

(20,112

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

$

43,000

 

$

 

$

43,000

 

Unecured term loan

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

200,000

 

Secured term loan

 

$

 

$

200,000

 

$

(200,000

)

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

372,457

 

$

569,026

 

$

(196,569

)

 

 

December 31,

 

Increase

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

(decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Selected Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

2,155,170

 

$

2,089,707

 

$

65,463

 

Investment in real estate ventures, at equity

 

$

156,310

 

$

 

$

156,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

$

500,000

 

$

250,000

 

$

250,000

 

Unsecured term loans

 

$

400,000

 

$

500,000

 

$

(100,000

)

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

200,218

 

$

228,759

 

$

(28,541

)

 

Storage facilities, net decreased $2.0increased $65.5 million during 2010 primarily as a result of $64.4 million of depreciation expense recognized during 2010 and $37.4 million related to the disposition of 16 facilities during 2010, offset by the acquisition of 1220 facilities, for $84.7 million and fixed asset additions.  Cashadditions and cash equivalents decreased $96.9development during the year.  Investment in real estate ventures, at equity increased by $156.3 million primarilyon account of our formation of the HHF joint venture in December 2013.

Unsecured senior notes increased $250 million due to funding the 2010 acquisitions and the repaymentissuance of several mortgages$250 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due December 15, 2023 during 2010, offset2013.  Unsecured term loan borrowings decreased by proceeds from the 2010 dispositions.  Notes receivable, net consisted of multiple promissory notes received in conjunction with storage facility dispositions and were fully repaid during 2010.

Our revolving credit facility increased $43.0$100 million as a result of borrowings related to payments for the 2010 acquisitions and the repayment of multiple mortgages in 2010. The unsecured term loan increased $200$100 million and the secured term loan balance decreased $200 million due to the amendment of the Credit Facility in September 2010.outstanding indebtedness under Term Loan C.  Mortgage loans and notes payable decreased $196.6$28.5 million due to scheduled principal payments and the repayment of several mortgages during the year.

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations as of December 31, 20102013 (in thousands):

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016 and

 

 

 

Total

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

thereafter

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable (a)

 

$

372,481

 

$

8,893

 

$

163,710

 

$

26,240

 

$

91,058

 

$

60,095

 

$

22,485

 

Revolving credit facility and unsecured term loan (b)

 

243,000

 

 

 

243,000

 

 

 

 

Interest payments (b)

 

95,424

 

29,303

 

26,561

 

20,186

 

9,891

 

4,450

 

5,033

 

Ground leases and third party office lease

 

548

 

149

 

149

 

149

 

101

 

 

 

Related party office leases

 

1,948

 

475

 

475

 

499

 

499

 

 

 

Software and service contracts

 

1,029

 

1,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employment contracts

 

2,138

 

918

 

610

 

610

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

716,568

 

$

40,767

 

$

191,505

 

$

290,684

 

$

101,549

 

$

64,545

 

$

27,518

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019 and

 

 

 

Total

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

thereafter

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable (a)

 

$

196,544

 

$

5,214

 

$

95,397

 

$

21,342

 

$

1,915

 

$

2,026

 

$

70,650

 

Revolving credit facility and unsecured term loans

 

438,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

38,600

 

200,000

 

200,000

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

500,000

 

Interest payments

 

311,263

 

48,198

 

46,441

 

41,108

 

37,482

 

33,236

 

104,798

 

Ground leases

 

71,401

 

1,329

 

1,336

 

1,329

 

1,329

 

1,242

 

64,836

 

Related party office leases

 

499

 

499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software and service contracts

 

1,111

 

1,111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction commitments

 

54,251

 

39,756

 

14,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,573,669

 

$

96,107

 

$

157,669

 

$

63,779

 

$

79,326

 

$

236,504

 

$

940,284

 

 


(a)  Amounts do not include unamortized discounts/premiums.

 

(b)  Interest on variable rate debt calculated using LIBOR as of December 31, 2010, plus a spread of 3.50%.

47



Table of Contents

We expect that theto satisfy contractual obligations owed in 2011 will be satisfied by2014 through a combination of cash generated from operations and from draws on the revolving credit facility.portion of our Credit Facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.arrangements, financings, or other relationships with other unconsolidated entities (other than our co-investment partnerships) or other persons, also known as variable interest entities not previously discussed.

57



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The Company’sOur future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments depend upon prevailing interest rates.

Market Risk

 

Our investment policy relating to cash and cash equivalents is to preserve principal and liquidity while maximizing the return through investment of available funds.

 

Effect of Changes in Interest Rates on our Outstanding Debt

 

Our interest rate risk objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates for a portion of our borrowings through the use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps or caps to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate on a portion of our variable rate debt.  The analysis below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to selected changes in market interest rates.  The range of changes chosen reflects our view of changes which are reasonably possible over a one-year period.  Market values are the present value of projected future cash flows based on the market interest rates chosen.

 

Our financial instruments consist of both fixed and variable rate debt.  As of December 31, 2010,2013 our consolidated debt consisted of $372.5$1,100.2 million inof outstanding mortgages, unsecured senior notes and unsecured term loans that are subject to fixed rate loans payable, $200.0 million in arates, including variable rate unsecured term loan and $43.0debt that is effectively fixed through our use of interest rate swaps.  There was also $38.6 million in the unsecured revolvingof outstanding credit facility.  All financial instruments were entered into for other than trading purposes and the net market value of these financial instruments is referredfacility borrowings subject to as the net financial position.floating rates.  Changes in interest rates have different impacts on the fixed and variable rate portions of our debt portfolio.  A change in interest rates on the fixed portion of the debt portfolio impacts the net financial instrument position, but has no impact on interest incurred or cash flows.  A change in interest rates on the variable portion of the debt portfolio impacts the interest incurred and cash flows, , but does not impact the net financial instrument position.

 

If market interest rates of interest on our variable rate debt increase by 1%,100 basis points, the increase in annual interest expense on our variable rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.4$0.4 million a year.  If market interest rates of interest on our variable rate debt decrease by 1%,100 basis points, the decrease in interest expense on our variable rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.4$0.4 million a year.

 

If market interest rates of interest increase by 1%,100 basis points, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt and unsecured term loans would decrease by approximately $9.3$60.1 million.  If market interest rates of interest decrease by 1%,100 basis points, the fair value of our outstanding fixed-rate mortgage debt and unsecured term loans would increase by approximately $9.7$64.7 million.

 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Financial statements required by this item appear with an Index to Financial Statements and Schedules, starting on page F-1 of this report.Report.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

4858



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures (Parent Company)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, weReport, the Parent Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of ourits management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)its chief executive officer and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”),chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of ourits disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)).  Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

Based on that evaluation, the CEOParent Company’s chief executive officer and the CFOchief financial officer have concluded that ourthe Parent Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by usthe Parent Company in reports that we fileit files or submitsubmits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to ourthe Parent Company’s management, including our CEOits chief executive officer and CFO,chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There has been no change in ourthe Parent Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during its most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting of the Parent Company is set forth on page F-2 of this Report, and is incorporated herein by reference. The effectiveness of the Parent Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.

Controls and Procedures (Operating Partnership)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Operating Partnership carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Operating Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act).

Based on that evaluation, the Operating Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that the Operating Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Operating Partnership in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Operating Partnership’s management, including the Operating Partnership’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ourthe Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

59



Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting of the Operating Partnership is set forth on page F-2F-3 of this Annual Report, on Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference. The effectiveness of the Operating Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which is included herein.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Not applicable.

 

4960



Table of Contents

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.  TRUSTEES, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for all of our employees, officers and trustees, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, which is available on our website at www.ustoreit.com.www.cubesmart.com.  We intend to disclose any amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver.

 

The remaining information required by this item regarding trustees, executive officers and corporate governance is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Shareholders Meeting to be held in 20112014 (the “Proxy Statement”) under the captions “Proposal 1: Election of Trustees,” “Executive Officers” andOfficers,” “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Trustees.Trustees,” and “Shareholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2014 Annual Meeting.”  The information required by this item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”

 

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation Committee Report,” “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Trustees — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,” and “Trustee Compensation.”

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTAND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010.2013.

 

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a)

 

 

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column(a)

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

 

5,013,760

(1)

$

10.38

(2)

4,902,492

 

 

4,904,613

(1)

$

10.99

(2)

2,704,442

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

4,902,492

 

 

4,904,613

 

$

10.99

 

2,704,442

 

 


(1)                                 Excludes 671,8221,107,905 shares subject to outstanding restricted share unit awards.

 

(2)                                 This number reflects the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options and has been calculated exclusive of outstanding restricted unit awards.

 

The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement under the caption “Security Ownership of Management” and “Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners.”

61



Table of Contents

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement under the captions “Corporate Governance- Independence of Trustees,” “Policies and Procedures Regarding Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions With Related Persons,” and “Transactions With Related Persons.”

 

50



Table of Contents

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the material appearing in the Parent Company’s Proxy Statement under the captions “Audit Committee Matters - Fees Paid to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “—“- Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”

62



Table of Contents

 

PART IV

ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

 

1. Financial Statements.

 

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

 

2. Financial Statement Schedules.

 

The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.

 

3. Exhibits.

 

The list of exhibits filed with this report is set forth in response to Item 15(b). The required exhibit index has been filed with the exhibits.

 

(b) Exhibits.  The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report:

 

3.1*

 

Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Declaration of Trust of U-Store-It Trust, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

3.2*

 

Second Amended and Restated BylawsArticles of U-Store-ItAmendment of Declaration of Trust of CubeSmart, dated September 14, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.23.1 to the Company’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008,8-K, filed on November 10, 2008.September 16, 2012.

 

 

 

4.1*3.3*

 

FormArticles Supplementary to Declaration of Common Share Certificate,Trust of CubeSmart classifying and designating CubeSmart’s 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13.3 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement onCubeSmart’s Form S-11,8-A, filed on October 20, 2004, File No. 333-117848.31, 2012.

 

 

 

10.1*3.4*

Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of CubeSmart, effective September 14, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 16, 2012.

3.5*

Certificate of Limited Partnership of U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to CubeSmart, L.P.’s Registration Statement on Form 10, filed on July 15, 2012.

3.6*

Amendment No. 1 to Certificate of Limited Partnership of CubeSmart, L.P., dated September 14, 2012, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 16, 2012.

3.7*

 

Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of U-Store-It, L.P. dated as of October 27, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.2*3.8*

 

Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement of Limited Partnership of CubeSmart, L.P. dated December 7, 2009, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., U-Store-It Trust, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Bankas of America Securities LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Regions Bank, SunTrust Bank and the financial institutions initially signatory thereto,November 2, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 8, 2009.September 16, 2011.

 

 

 

10.3*3.9*

 

FormAmendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Guaranty,Limited Partnership of CubeSmart, L.P. dated as of November 2, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 8, 2009.

10.4*

Form of Term Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 8, 2009.

10.5*

Form of Revolving Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 8, 2009.November 2, 2011.

 

5163



Table of Contents

 

10.6*4.1*

 

Form of Swingline Note,Common Share Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Amendment No. 3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11, filed on October 20, 2004, File No. 333-117848.

4.2*

Form of Certificate for CubeSmart’s 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to CubeSmart’s Form 8-A, filed on October 31, 2011.

4.3*

Indenture, dated as of September 16, 2011, among CubeSmart, L.P., CubeSmart and U.S. Bank National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed on September 16, 2011.

4.4*

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 26, 2012, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 26, 2012.

4.5*

Form of $250 million aggregate principal amount of 4.80% senior note due July 15, 2022, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 26, 2012.

4.6*

Form of CubeSmart Notation of Guarantee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 26, 2012.

4.7*

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 17, 2013, among the Company, the Operating Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 8, 2009.17, 2013.

 

 

 

10.7*4.8*

 

Form$250 million aggregate principal amount of Security Interest regarding fixed rate mortgage loan between YSI XX LP and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company,4.375% senior notes due December 15, 2023, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 4, 2005.December 17, 2013.

 

 

 

10.8*4.9*

 

Secured Promissory Note, dated November 1, 2005, between YSI XX LP and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company,CubeSmart Guarantee, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 4, 2005.December 17, 2013.

 

 

 

10.9*

Loan Agreement, dated August 4, 2005, by and between YASKY LLC and LaSalle Bank National Association, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed on November 14, 2005.

10.10*

Loan Agreement, dated July 19, 2005, by and between YSI VI LLC and Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed on November 14, 2005.

10.11*

Loan Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and between YSI I LLC and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. d/b/a Lehman Capital, a division of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.12*

Loan Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and between YSI II LLC and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. d/b/a Lehman Capital, a division of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.13*

Standstill Agreement, by and among, U-Store-It Trust, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell and Todd C. Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.14*10.1*

 

Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P., YSI Management LLC, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., U-Store-It Development, LLC, Dean Jernigan, Kathleen A. Weigand, Robert J. Amsdell, Barry L. Amsdell, Todd C. Amsdell, Kyle V. Amsdell, Rising Tide Development LLC, and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.15*

Purchase and Sale Agreement, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Rising Tide Development, LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.16*10.2*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated March 29, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.17*10.3*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.18*10.4*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

 

 

 

10.19*10.5*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

64



Table of Contents

10.20*10.6*

 

First Amendment to Lease, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Amsdell and Amsdell, dated August 6, 2007, amending Lease dated December 5, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

52



Table of Contents

 

10.21*10.7*

 

Lease, dated March 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 31, 2005.

 

 

 

10.22*10.8*

 

Lease, dated June 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.23*10.9*

 

Lease, dated June 29, 2005, by and between Amsdell and Amsdell and U-Store-It, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, filed on August 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.24*

Option Termination Agreement, by and between U-Store-It, L.P. and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.25*

Property Management Termination Agreement, by and among U-Store-It Trust, YSI Management LLC, and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.26*

Marketing and Ancillary Services Termination Agreement, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It Mini Warehouse Co., and Rising Tide Development LLC, dated August 6, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2007.

10.27*10.10*

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.28*10.11*

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated January 24, 2011, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2011.

 

 

 

10.29*10.12*

 

Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.30*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of January 25, 2008, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Daniel B. Hurwitz, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on February 29, 2008.

10.31*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2007, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Marianne M. Keler, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.32*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on March 16, 2007.

10.33*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated June 5, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed on August 8, 2006.

10.34*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.

10.35*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Robert J. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the

53



Table of Contents

Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.36*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Barry L. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.37*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Todd C. Amsdell, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.38*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and John C. Dannemiller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.39*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Thomas A. Commes, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.40*10.13*

 

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and David J. LaRue (substantially identical agreements have been entered into with Dean Jernigan, Christopher P. Marr, Timothy M. Martin, Jeffrey P. Foster, Daniel William M. Diefenderfer III, Piero Bussani, John W. Fain, B. Hurwitz, Marianne M. Keler, and John F. Remondi), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.41*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Harold S. Haller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.42*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2004, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and William M. Diefenderfer III, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 2004.

10.43*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2009, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and John F. Remondi, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.

10.44*10.14*

 

Amended and Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Timothy M. Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.45*10.15*

 

Amended and Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of January 24, 2011, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2011.

 

 

 

10.46*10.16*

 

Amended and Restated Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 2, 2010.

 

 

 

10.47*†

Schedule of Compensation for Non-Employee Trustees of U-Store-It Trust, effective May 8, 2007, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.48*10.17*

 

Nonqualified Share Option Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Christopher P. Marr, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed on August 8, 2006.

 

 

 

10.49*10.18*

 

Nonqualified Share Option Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2006, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Dean Jernigan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 24, 2006.

 

 

 

10.50*10.19*

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Trustees under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.83 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed on February 29, 2008.

 

5465



Table of Contents

 

10.51*†

Form of Restricted Share Agreement for Non-Employee Trustees under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

10.52*†

Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.53*10.20*

 

Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.54*†

Form of Performance-Vested Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.55*10.21*

 

Form of Performance-Vested Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.2007

 

 

 

10.56*†

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.57*10.22*

 

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 10, 2007.

 

 

 

10.58*10.23*†

Form of Nonqualified Share Option Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.24*†

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the U-Store-It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 25, 2008.

10.25*

 

U-Store-It Trust Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.78 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

 

 

 

10.59*10.26*

 

U-Store-It Trust Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.79 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

 

 

 

10.60*10.27*

 

U-Store-It Trust Deferred Trustees Plan, effective as of May 31, 2005, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 6, 2005.

 

 

 

10.61*10.28*

 

Amended and Restated U-Store It Trust 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, effective June 2, 2010,2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 4, 2010.2011.

 

 

 

10.62*10.29*

 

2004 Equity Incentive Plan of U-Store-It Trust, effective as of October 19, 2004, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8- K, filed on November 2, 2004.

 

 

 

10.63*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2009, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Jeffrey Foster, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.83 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

10.64*†

Severance and General Release Agreement dated February 10, 2009 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Kathleen Weigand, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.84 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

10.65*†

Severance and General Release Agreement dated December 31, 2008 by and between U-Store-It Trust and Steve Nichols, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.85 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009.

55



Table of Contents

10.66*

Contribution Agreement dated August 6, 2009 by and between YSI Venture LP LLC and HART -YSI Investor LP LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 7, 2009.

10.67*

First Amendment to Contribution Agreement dated August 13, 2009 by and between YSI Venture LP LLC and HART -YSI Investor LP LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 14, 2009.

10.68*

Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of YSI — HART LIMITED PARTNERSHIP dated August 13, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 14, 2009.

10.69*10.31*

 

Sales Agreement dated April 3, 2009, among the U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P., and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 3, 2009.

 

 

 

10.70*†

Letter Agreement dated January 9, 2009 between U-Store-It Trust and Jeffrey P. Foster, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.

10.71*†

Indemnification Agreement, dated as of February 23, 2010, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store-It, L.P. and Piero Bussani, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.71 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.

10.72*†

Employment letter Agreement, dated July 13, 2010, by and between U-Store-It Trust and Robert G. Blatz, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 29, 2010.

10.73*

Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2010, by and among U-Store-It, L.P., U-Store-It Trust, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Banc of America Securities LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 4, 2010.

10.74*10.32*

 

Amendment No. 1 to Sales Agreement, dated January 26, 2011, by and among U-Store-It Trust, U-Store It, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2011.

 

 

 

10.75*10.33*

 

IndemnificationAmended and Restated Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of January 31,April 4, 2011, by and amongbetween U-Store-It Trust U-Store-It, L.P. and Jeffrey F. Rogatz,P. Foster, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on April 6, 2011.

10.34*

Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 20, 2011 by and among U-Store-It, L.P., as Borrower, U-Store-It Trust, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 23, 2011.

66



Table of Contents

10.35*

Amendment No. 2 to the Sales Agreement, dated September 16, 2011 among CubeSmart, CubeSmart, L.P. and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on September 16, 2011.

10.36*

Agreement for Purchase & Sale, dated as of October 24, 2011, by and between CubeSmart, L.P. and 200 East 135th Street LLC, 1880 Bartow Avenue LLC, 255 Exterior St LLC, 1376 Cromwell LLC, 175th Street DE LLC, Boston Rd LLC, Bronx River LLC, Bruckner Blvd LLC, 1980 White Plains Road, 552 Van Buren LLC, 481 Grand LLC, 2047 Pitkin LLC, Sheffield Ave LLC, Cropsey Ave LLC, 9826 Jamaica Ave LLC, 179 Jamaica Avenue Realty LLC, 714 Markley St LLC, Yorktown Heights Storage, LLC, Marbledale Rd LLC, New Rochelle Storage Partners, L.L.C., Wilton Storage Partners L.L.C. and Shelton Storage LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 24, 2011.

10.37*

Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 24, 2011 by and between CubeSmart and Wells Fargo Investment Holdings, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 24, 2011.

10.38*

Waiver of Ownership Limitation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 24, 2011.

10.40*

Purchase Agreement for Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, dated October 24, 2011, between CubeSmart and Wells Fargo Investment Holdings, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 31, 2011.

10.41*

Credit Agreement dated as of December 9, 2011 by and among CubeSmart, L.P., CubeSmart, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC and Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as Revolver and Tranche A joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Tranche B sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 14, 2011.

10.42*†

Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2013.

10.43*†

Form of Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2013.

10.44* †

Form of 2012 Performance-Vested Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 31, 2012.

10.45*

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2012, by and among CubeSmart, L.P., CubeSmart, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and each of the lenders party to the credit agreement dated December 9, 2011, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 7, 2012.

10.46* †

Performance Share Unit Award and Agreement, dated May 30, 2012, between CubeSmart and Dean Jernigan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 1, 2011.2012.

10.47*†

Form of Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement (2-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2013.

67



Table of Contents

10.48*†

Form of Performance-Vested Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 28, 2013.

10.49*

Waiver of Ownership Limitation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 6, 2013.

10.50*

Form of Equity Distribution Agreement, dated May 7, 2013, by and among CubeSmart, CubeSmart, L.P. and each of Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp., Jefferies LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1. to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on May 7, 2013.

10.51*

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of June 18, 2013 by and among CubeSmart, L.P., CubeSmart, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and each of the lenders, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 18, 2013.

10.52*

Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 18, 2013 by and among CubeSmart, L.P., CubeSmart, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent and each of the lenders, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on June 18, 2013.

10.53*†

Advisory Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on November 8, 2013.

10.54*

Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2013, by and among the Sellers listed therein and CubeSmart, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 10, 2013.

10.55*

Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2013, by and among the Sellers listed therein and CubeSmart, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 10, 2013.

10.56*†

Executive Employment Agreement, entered into as of January 24, 2014 and effective as of January 1, 2014, by and between CubeSmart and Christopher P. Marr., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 28, 2014.

10.57†

Form of Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.58†

Form of Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement for Executive Officers (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.59†

Form of Non-Qualified Share Option Agreement (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.60†

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for Executive Officers (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.61†

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.62†

Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.63†

Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for Executive Officers (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.64†

Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement (3-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.

10.65†

Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement (5-Year Vesting) under the CubeSmart 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

12.1

 

Statement regarding Computation of Ratios of U-Store-It TrustCubeSmart

12.2

Statement regarding Computation of Ratios of CubeSmart, L.P.

 

 

 

21.1

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of KPMG LLP relating to financial statements of CubeSmart

23.2

Consent of KPMG LLP relating to financial statements of CubeSmart, L.P.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of CubeSmart required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of CubeSmart required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.3

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of CubeSmart, L.P. required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

68



Table of Contents

31.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of CubeSmart, L.P. required by Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CubeSmart pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CubeSmart, L.P. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

99.1

 

Material Tax ConsiderationsConsiderations.

101

The following CubeSmart and CubeSmart, L.P. financial information for the year ended December 31, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, detailed tagged and filed herewith.

 


*Incorporated herein by reference as above indicated.

 

Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

 

5669



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this reportReport to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/  Timothy M. Martin

 

 

Timothy M. Martin

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 28, 2014

Date: March 1, 2011

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this reportReport has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ William M. Diefenderfer III

 

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

William M. Diefenderfer III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Dean JerniganChristopher P. Marr

 

Chief Executive Officer and Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Dean JerniganChristopher P. Marr

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Timothy M. Martin

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Timothy M. Martin

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Piero Bussani

 

Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Piero Bussani

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Harold S. HallerJohn W. Fain

 

Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Harold S. HallerJohn W. Fain

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Marianne M. Keler

 

Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Marianne M. Keler

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ David J. LaRue

Trustee

March 1, 2011

David J. LaRue

/s/ John R.F. Remondi

 

Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

John R.F. Remondi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey F. Rogatz

 

Trustee

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

Jeffrey F. Rogatz

 

 

 

 

/s/ Deborah Ratner Salzberg

Trustee

February 28, 2014

Deborah Ratner Salzberg

 

5770



Table of Contents

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Page No.

Consolidated Financial Statements of U-Store-It TrustCUBESMART and Subsidiaries (TheCUBESMART, L.P. (the “Company”)

 

 

 

Management’s Report on CubeSmart Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

F-2

 

Management’s Report on CubeSmart, L.P. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

F-3

 

 

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsFirm

F-3F-4

 

 

CubeSmart and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20102013 and 20092012

F-5F-8

 

 

CubeSmart and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011

F-6F-9

 

 

CubeSmart and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011

F-10

CubeSmart and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011

F-7F-11

 

 

CubeSmart and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011

F-8F-12

 

CubeSmart, L.P. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012

F-13

CubeSmart, L.P. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011

F-14

CubeSmart, L.P. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011

F-15

CubeSmart, L.P. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Capital for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011

F-16

CubeSmart, L.P. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011

F-17

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9F-18

 

F-1



Table of Contents

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON CUBESMART INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

 

Management of the CompanyCubeSmart (the “REIT”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’sREIT’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Company’sREIT’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and report on the basis of that assessment whether the Company’sREIT’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

 

The Company’sREIT’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’sREIT’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

·                  pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and the disposition of the assets of the Company;REIT;

 

·                  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that the receipts and expenditures of the CompanyREIT are being made only in accordance with the authorization of the Company’sREIT’s management and its Board of Trustees; and

 

·                  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’sREIT’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

 

Under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Company’sREIT’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, wemanagement conducted a review, evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2013, based uponon criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) criteria.. In performing its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, our2013, the REIT’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO framework.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2013, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that appears herein.

 

March 1, 2011February 28, 2014

 

F-2



Table of Contents

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON CUBESMART, L.P. INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of CubeSmart, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Partnership’s management is required to assess the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year, and report on the basis of that assessment whether the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

·pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and the disposition of the assets of the Partnership;

·provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that the receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with the authorization of the Partnership’s management and its Board of Trustees; and

·provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Partnership’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, management conducted a review, evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In performing its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on the COSO framework.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that appears herein.

February 28, 2014

F-3



Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of

CubeSmart:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CubeSmart as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement Schedule III.  These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of CubeSmart’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CubeSmart as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CubeSmart’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of CubeSmart’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2014

F-4



Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Partners of

CubeSmart, L.P.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CubeSmart, L.P. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement Schedule III.  These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of CubeSmart, L.P.’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CubeSmart, L.P. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CubeSmart, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 28, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of CubeSmart, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2014

F-5



Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of

U-Store-It Trust:CubeSmart:

 

We have audited U-Store-It Trust and subsidiaries’CubeSmart’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). U-Store-It Trust’sCubeSmart’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on CubeSmart Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) pr ovideprovide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, U-Store-It TrustCubeSmart maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiariesCubeSmart as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010,2013, and our report dated March 1, 2011February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 1, 2011

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2014

 

F-3F-6



Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Trustees and ShareholdersPartners of

U-Store-It Trust:CubeSmart, L.P.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiariesCubeSmart, L.P’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the related consolidated statementsCommittee of operations, equity, and cash flows for eachSponsoring Organizations of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010.  In connection with our auditTreadway Commission (COSO). CubeSmart, L.P.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the consolidatedeffectiveness of internal control over financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule for 2010 as listedreporting, included in the accompanying index.  These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management.Management’s Report on CubeSmart L.P. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidatedthe Company’s internal control over financial statements and financial statement schedulereporting based on our audits.audit.

 

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the financial statements are freerisk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of material misstatement.  Aninternal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosuresalso included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.circumstances. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,CubeSmart, L.P. maintained, in all material respects, theeffective internal control over financial position of U-Store-It Trust and subsidiariesreporting as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the resultsCommittee of their operations and their cash flows for eachSponsoring Organizations of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.Treadway Commission.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), U-Store-It Trust’s internal control over financial reportingthe consolidated balance sheets of CubeSmart, L.P. as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by2013 and 2012, and the Committeerelated consolidated statements of Sponsoring Organizationsoperations, comprehensive income (loss), capital, and cash flows for each of the Treadway Commission (COSO),years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated March 1, 2011February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control overthose consolidated financial reporting.statements.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 1, 2011

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

February 28, 2014

 

F-4F-7



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities

 

$

1,743,021

 

$

1,774,542

 

 

$

2,553,706

 

$

2,443,022

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

(314,530

)

(344,009

)

 

(398,536

)

(353,315

)

Storage facilities, net

 

1,428,491

 

1,430,533

 

Storage facilities, net (including VIE assets of $34,559 and $11,586)

 

2,155,170

 

2,089,707

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

5,891

 

102,768

 

 

3,176

 

4,495

 

Restricted cash

 

10,250

 

16,381

 

 

4,025

 

6,070

 

Loan procurement costs, net of amortization

 

15,611

 

18,366

 

 

12,687

 

8,253

 

Notes receivable, net

 

 

20,112

 

Investment in real estate venture, at equity

 

156,310

 

 

Other assets, net

 

18,576

 

10,710

 

 

27,256

 

41,794

 

Total assets

 

$

1,478,819

 

$

1,598,870

 

 

$

2,358,624

 

$

2,150,319

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

$

500,000

 

$

250,000

 

Revolving credit facility

 

$

43,000

 

$

 

 

38,600

 

45,000

 

Unsecured term loan

 

200,000

 

 

Secured term loan

 

 

200,000

 

Unsecured term loans

 

400,000

 

500,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

372,457

 

569,026

 

 

200,218

 

228,759

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

36,172

 

33,767

 

 

57,599

 

60,708

 

Distributions payable

 

7,275

 

2,448

 

 

19,955

 

16,419

 

Deferred revenue

 

8,873

 

8,449

 

 

12,394

 

11,090

 

Security deposits

 

489

 

456

 

 

376

 

444

 

Total liabilities

 

668,266

 

814,146

 

 

1,229,142

 

1,112,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

45,145

 

45,394

 

 

36,275

 

47,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common shares $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 98,596,796 and 92,654,979 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

 

986

 

927

 

Additional paid in capital

 

1,026,952

 

974,926

 

7.75% Series A Preferred shares $.01 par value, 3,220,000 shares authorized, 3,100,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

 

31

 

31

 

Common shares $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 139,328,366 and 131,794,547 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

 

1,393

 

1,318

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,542,703

 

1,418,463

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(1,121

)

(874

)

 

(11,014

)

(19,796

)

Accumulated deficit

 

(302,601

)

(279,670

)

 

(440,837

)

(410,225

)

Total U-Store-It Trust shareholders’ equity

 

724,216

 

695,309

 

Total CubeSmart shareholders’ equity

 

1,092,276

 

989,791

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

41,192

 

44,021

 

 

931

 

118

 

Total equity

 

765,408

 

739,330

 

 

1,093,207

 

989,909

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

1,478,819

 

$

1,598,870

 

 

$

2,358,624

 

$

2,150,319

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-5F-8



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

195,357

 

$

194,590

 

$

202,200

 

 

$

281,250

 

$

236,160

 

$

188,249

 

Other property related income

 

 

18,640

 

 

16,086

 

 

15,130

 

 

32,365

 

25,821

 

18,987

 

Property management fee income

 

 

2,829

 

 

56

 

 

 

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

Total revenues

 

 

216,826

 

 

210,732

 

 

217,330

 

 

318,395

 

266,322

 

211,004

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

 

93,696

 

 

91,380

 

 

92,533

 

 

118,222

 

103,488

 

87,570

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

62,945

 

 

69,125

 

 

71,974

 

 

112,313

 

109,830

 

61,972

 

General and administrative

 

 

25,406

 

 

22,569

 

 

24,964

 

 

29,563

 

26,131

 

24,693

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

182,047

 

 

183,074

 

 

189,471

 

 

260,098

 

239,449

 

174,235

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

 

34,779

 

 

27,658

 

 

27,859

 

 

58,297

 

26,873

 

36,769

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

 

(37,794

)

 

(45,269

)

 

(52,014

)

 

(40,424

)

(40,318

)

(32,787

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

 

(6,463

)

 

(2,339

)

 

(1,929

)

 

(2,058

)

(3,279

)

(5,028

)

Interest income

 

 

621

 

 

681

 

 

153

 

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

(414

)

 

(8,167

)

Acquisition related costs

 

 

(759

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,849

)

(3,086

)

(3,823

)

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(281

)

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

7,023

 

 

Other

 

 

(235

)

 

(33

)

 

94

 

 

8

 

256

 

(83

)

Total other expense

 

 

(44,630

)

 

(46,960

)

 

(53,696

)

 

(47,888

)

(40,149

)

(50,169

)

LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

 

(9,851

)

 

(19,302

)

 

(25,837

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

10,409

 

(13,276

)

(13,400

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

2,006

 

 

4,831

 

 

9,219

 

 

4,145

 

7,093

 

11,944

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

 

1,826

 

 

14,139

 

 

19,720

 

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

Total discontinued operations

 

 

3,832

 

 

18,970

 

 

28,939

 

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

NET (LOSS) INCOME

 

 

(6,019

)

 

(332

)

 

3,102

 

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

41,994

 

3,628

 

2,447

 

NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

381

 

 

60

 

 

(310

)

 

(588

)

107

 

(35

)

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

 

(1,755

)

 

(665

)

 

 

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

NET (LOSS) INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

41,448

 

1,817

 

(398

)

Distribution to preferred shareholders

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.04

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.46

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding

 

 

93,998

 

 

70,988

 

 

57,621

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic shares outstanding

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY’S COMMON SHAREHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

Total discontinued operations

 

 

3,656

 

 

17,984

 

 

26,595

 

 

31,048

 

16,498

 

15,118

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6F-9



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 (in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

$

41,994

 

$

3,628

 

$

2,447

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps

 

2,636

 

(13,548

)

(14,477

)

Reclassification of realized losses on interest rate swaps

 

6,266

 

6,082

 

2,083

 

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

56

 

172

 

151

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

8,958

 

(7,294

)

(12,243

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

50,952

 

(3,666

)

(9,796

)

Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

(740

)

445

 

503

 

Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

18

 

(1,927

)

(2,815

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY

 

$

50,230

 

$

(5,148

)

$

(12,108

)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-10



Table of Contents

CUBESMART AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

 

Common Shares

 

Additional
Paid in

 

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

Total
Shareholders’

 

Noncontrolling
Interest in

 

Total

 

Noncontrolling

Interests in the
Operating

 

 

Common
Shares

 

Preferred
Shares

 

Additional
Paid-in

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive

 

Accumulated

 

Total
Shareholders ’

 

Noncontrolling
Interests in

 

Total

 

Noncontrolling
Interests in
the
Operating

 

 

Number

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Loss

 

Deficit

 

Equity

 

Subsidiaries

 

Equity

 

Partnership

 

 

Number

 

Amount

 

Number

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

(Loss) Income

 

Deficit

 

Equity

 

Subsidiaries

 

Equity

 

Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

57,577

 

$

 

576

 

$

 

797,940

 

$

 

(1,664

)

$

 

(241,233

)

$

 

555,619

 

$

 

 

$

 

555,619

 

$

48,982

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

98,597

 

$

986

 

 

$

 

$

1,026,952

 

$

(1,121

)

$

(302,601

)

$

724,216

 

$

41,192

 

$

765,408

 

$

45,145

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

Issuance of common shares, net

 

23,140

 

231

 

 

 

 

 

203,788

 

 

 

 

 

204,019

 

 

 

204,019

 

 

 

Issuance of preferred shares, net

 

 

 

 

 

3,100

 

31

 

74,817

 

 

 

 

 

74,848

 

 

 

74,848

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

235

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

623

 

 

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

624

 

(624

)

Exercise of stock options

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

1,297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

1,425

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

367

 

 

 

(310

)

57

 

 

 

57

 

(435

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,102

 

3,102

 

 

 

3,102

 

310

 

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

(4,608

)

 

 

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

(1,281

)

 

 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(32,683

)

(32,683

)

 

 

(32,683

)

(2,831

)

Balance at December 31, 2008

 

57,623

 

$

 

576

 

$

 

801,029

 

$

 

(7,553

)

$

 

(271,124

)

$

 

522,928

 

$

 

 

$

 

522,928

 

$

46,026

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

44,739

 

44,739

 

(90

)

Issuance of common shares, net

 

34,677

 

347

 

170,501

 

 

 

 

 

170,848

 

 

 

170,848

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

85

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

270

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

1,765

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(937

)

(937

)

665

 

(272

)

(60

)

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on interest rate swap

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,153

 

 

 

6,153

 

 

 

6,153

 

1

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,082

)

(7,082

)

 

 

(7,082

)

7,082

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(398

)

(398

)

2,810

 

2,412

 

35

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,849

)

 

 

(11,849

)

 

 

(11,849

)

(545

)

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

526

 

 

 

526

 

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

139

 

 

 

139

 

5

 

144

 

7

 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,609

)

(7,609

)

(1,383

)

(8,992

)

(510

)

Balance at December 31, 2009

 

92,655

 

$

 

927

 

$

 

974,926

 

$

 

(874

)

$

 

(279,670

)

$

 

695,309

 

$

 

44,021

 

$

 

739,330

 

$

45,394

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

15

 

 

 

Preferred share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,218

)

(1,218

)

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

Common share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(30,714

)

(30,714

)

(4,599

)

(35,313

)

(1,368

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

122,059

 

$

1,221

 

3,100

 

$

31

 

$

1,309,505

 

$

(12,831

)

$

(342,013

)

$

955,913

 

$

39,409

 

$

995,322

 

$

49,732

 

Issuance of common shares, net

 

5,610

 

56

 

47,517

 

 

 

 

 

47,573

 

 

 

47,573

 

 

 

 

7,900

 

79

 

 

 

 

 

102,000

 

 

 

 

 

102,079

 

 

 

102,079

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

203

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

246

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

73

 

1

 

674

 

 

 

 

 

675

 

 

 

675

 

(675

)

 

1,380

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

19,233

 

 

 

 

 

19,247

 

 

 

19,247

 

(19,247

)

Exercise of stock options

 

56

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

194

 

 

 

 

210

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

1,627

 

 

 

 

 

1,629

 

 

 

1,629

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

1,759

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

1,882

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interest in operating partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,510

)

(1,510

)

 

 

(1,510

)

1,510

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,393

)

(7,393

)

1,755

 

(5,638

)

(381

)

Other comprehensive loss:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(247

)

 

 

(247

)

(8

)

(255

)

(13

)

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14,028

)

(14,028

)

(4,591

)

(18,619

)

(690

)

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

98,597

 

$

 

986

 

$

 

1,026,952

 

$

 

(1,121

)

$

 

(302,601

)

$

 

724,216

 

$

 

41,192

 

$

 

765,408

 

45,145

 

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(18,452

)

 

 

 

 

(18,452

)

(38,532

)

(56,984

)

(132

)

Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(19,520

)

(19,520

)

 

 

(19,520

)

19,520

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,817

 

1,817

 

1,918

 

3,735

 

(107

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,124

)

 

 

(7,124

)

 

 

(7,124

)

(342

)

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

159

 

 

 

159

 

9

 

168

 

4

 

Preferred share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

Common share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(44,501

)

(44,501

)

(2,686

)

(47,187

)

(1,438

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

131,795

 

$

1,318

 

3,100

 

$

31

 

$

1,418,463

 

$

(19,796

)

$

(410,225

)

$

989,791

 

$

118

 

$

989,909

 

$

47,990

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

831

 

831

 

 

 

Issuance of common shares, net

 

5,700

 

57

 

 

 

 

 

100,230

 

 

 

 

 

100,287

 

 

 

100,287

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted shares

 

301

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Conversion from units to shares

 

1,018

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

14,688

 

 

 

 

 

14,698

 

 

 

14,698

 

(14,698

)

Exercise of stock options

 

514

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

3,705

 

 

 

 

 

3,710

 

 

 

3,710

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

Share compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

Adjustment for noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,292

)

(3,292

)

 

 

(3,292

)

3,292

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,448

 

41,448

 

(42

)

41,406

 

588

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,751

 

 

 

8,751

 

 

 

8,751

 

151

 

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

31

 

24

 

55

 

1

 

Preferred share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

Common share distributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(62,760

)

(62,760

)

 

 

(62,760

)

(1,049

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

139,328

 

$

1,393

 

3,100

 

$

31

 

$

1,542,703

 

$

(11,014

)

$

(440,837

)

$

1,092,276

 

$

931

 

$

1,093,207

 

$

36,275

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7F-11



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(6,019

)

$

(332

)

$

3,102

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

41,994

 

$

3,628

 

$

2,447

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

70,850

 

75,908

 

80,132

 

 

117,074

 

118,573

 

73,702

 

Gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

(1,826

)

(14,139

)

(19,720

)

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

(27,440

)

(9,811

)

(3,903

)

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

(7,023

)

 

Equity compensation expense

 

3,641

 

3,396

 

2,722

 

 

5,617

 

4,550

 

3,204

 

Accretion of fair market value adjustment of debt

 

(255

)

(463

)

(446

)

 

(1,018

)

(707

)

(89

)

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

414

 

 

8,167

 

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

1,151

 

745

 

281

 

Changes in other operating accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

(427

)

388

 

1,425

 

 

(1,156

)

(2,125

)

(585

)

Restricted cash

 

3,889

 

 

 

 

567

 

3,545

 

(853

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

1,437

 

(1,797

)

(7

)

 

4,564

 

6,899

 

2,634

 

Other liabilities

 

227

 

(747

)

(196

)

 

1,095

 

154

 

(678

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

71,517

 

$

62,214

 

$

67,012

 

 

$

142,862

 

$

118,428

 

$

84,327

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions, additions and improvements to storage facilities

 

(104,441

)

(17,882

)

(30,738

)

Insurance settlements

 

 

 

1,447

 

Proceeds from sales of properties, net

 

37,304

 

68,257

 

56,867

 

Acquisitions of storage facilities

 

(181,612

)

(220,791

)

(445,320

)

Additions and improvements to storage facilities

 

(20,320

)

(22,395

)

(25,868

)

Development costs

 

(53,979

)

(4,227

)

 

Cash paid for remaining interest in real estate venture

 

 

(81,158

)

 

Investment in real estate venture, at equity

 

(157,461

)

 

(15,462

)

Cash distributed from real estate venture

 

 

909

 

 

Proceeds from sales of facilities, net

 

123,780

 

52,630

 

44,460

 

Proceeds from notes receivable

 

20,112

 

 

 

 

5,192

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales to noncontrolling interests

 

 

48,641

 

 

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash

 

2,242

 

(164

)

(399

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

$

(44,783

)

$

98,852

 

$

27,177

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

1,476

 

3,096

 

90

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(282,924

)

$

(271,936

)

$

(442,100

)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

247,488

 

249,638

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

95,000

 

9,500

 

57,300

 

 

636,200

 

403,000

 

256,700

 

Secured term loans

 

 

200,000

 

9,975

 

Unsecured term loans

 

 

100,000

 

400,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

 

116,615

 

 

 

 

 

3,537

 

Principal payments on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

(52,000

)

(181,500

)

(104,300

)

 

(642,600

)

(358,000

)

(299,700

)

Unsecured term loans

 

 

(200,000

)

 

 

(100,000

)

 

(200,000

)

Secured term loans

 

 

(57,419

)

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

(196,205

)

(95,211

)

(12,526

)

 

(36,496

)

(236,340

)

(39,321

)

Loan procurement costs

 

(4,400

)

(2,145

)

(5,484

)

Settlement of hedge transactions

 

 

(195

)

 

Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net

 

47,573

 

170,852

 

 

 

100,290

 

102,079

 

204,019

 

Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares, net

 

 

 

74,848

 

Exercise of stock options

 

194

 

 

 

 

3,710

 

1,629

 

121

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

15

 

 

 

 

831

 

 

1

 

Distributions paid to shareholders

 

(9,407

)

(6,736

)

(41,621

)

Cash paid for acquisition of noncontrolling interest

 

 

(61,113

)

 

Distributions paid to common shareholders

 

(59,159

)

(39,755

)

(27,849

)

Distributions paid to preferred shareholders

 

(6,008

)

(5,724

)

 

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in Operating Partnership

 

(482

)

(508

)

(3,656

)

 

(1,113

)

(1,454

)

(1,322

)

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(4,591

)

(1,383

)

 

 

 

(2,686

)

(4,599

)

Loan procurement costs

 

(3,708

)

(16,252

)

(134

)

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 

$

(123,611

)

$

(62,042

)

$

(94,962

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(96,877

)

99,024

 

(773

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

138,743

 

$

148,934

 

$

360,951

 

Change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,319

)

(4,574

)

3,178

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

102,768

 

3,744

 

4,517

 

 

4,495

 

9,069

 

5,891

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

5,891

 

$

102,768

 

$

3,744

 

 

$

3,176

 

$

4,495

 

$

9,069

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Cash Flow and Noncash Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized

 

$

38,346

 

$

43,764

 

$

52,291

 

 

$

43,130

 

$

33,578

 

$

33,265

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition related contingent consideration

 

$

1,777

 

$

 

$

 

Notes receivable originated upon disposition of property

 

$

 

$

17,600

 

$

2,612

 

Consolidation of real estate venture

 

$

 

$

13,527

 

$

 

Derivative valuation adjustment

 

$

 

$

6,153

 

$

(4,608

)

 

$

8,902

 

$

(7,271

)

$

(12,394

)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

$

(268

)

$

553

 

$

(1,281

)

 

$

56

 

$

172

 

$

151

 

Discount on issuance of unsecured senior notes

 

$

2,512

 

$

362

 

$

 

Mortgage loan assumption - acquisitions of storage facilities

 

$

8,866

 

$

107,011

 

$

21,827

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-8F-12



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT TRUSTCUBESMART, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities

 

$

2,553,706

 

$

2,443,022

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

(398,536

)

(353,315

)

Storage facilities, net (including VIE assets of $34,559 and $11,586)

 

2,155,170

 

2,089,707

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

3,176

 

4,495

 

Restricted cash

 

4,025

 

6,070

 

Loan procurement costs, net of amortization

 

12,687

 

8,253

 

Investment in real estate venture, at equity

 

156,310

 

 

Other assets, net

 

27,256

 

41,794

 

Total assets

 

$

2,358,624

 

$

2,150,319

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

$

500,000

 

$

250,000

 

Revolving credit facility

 

38,600

 

45,000

 

Unsecured term loan

 

400,000

 

500,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

200,218

 

228,759

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

 

57,599

 

60,708

 

Distributions payable

 

19,955

 

16,419

 

Deferred revenue

 

12,394

 

11,090

 

Security deposits

 

376

 

444

 

Total liabilities

 

1,229,142

 

1,112,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partnership interests of third parties

 

36,275

 

47,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partner

 

1,103,290

 

1,009,587

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(11,014

)

(19,796

)

Total CubeSmart, L.P. capital

 

1,092,276

 

989,791

 

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

931

 

118

 

Total capital

 

1,093,207

 

989,909

 

Total liabilities and capital

 

$

2,358,624

 

$

2,150,319

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-13



Table of Contents

CUBESMART, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per common unit data)

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

281,250

 

$

236,160

 

$

188,249

 

Other property related income

 

32,365

 

25,821

 

18,987

 

Property management fee income

 

4,780

 

4,341

 

3,768

 

Total revenues

 

318,395

 

266,322

 

211,004

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

118,222

 

103,488

 

87,570

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

112,313

 

109,830

 

61,972

 

General and administrative

 

29,563

 

26,131

 

24,693

 

Total operating expenses

 

260,098

 

239,449

 

174,235

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

58,297

 

26,873

 

36,769

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(40,424

)

(40,318

)

(32,787

)

Loan procurement amortization expense

 

(2,058

)

(3,279

)

(5,028

)

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

(414

)

 

(8,167

)

Acquisition related costs

 

(3,849

)

(3,086

)

(3,823

)

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(281

)

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

7,023

 

 

Other

 

8

 

256

 

(83

)

Total other expense

 

(47,888

)

(40,149

)

(50,169

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

 

10,409

 

(13,276

)

13,400

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

4,145

 

7,093

 

11,944

 

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

Total discontinued operations

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

NET INCOME

 

41,994

 

3,628

 

2,447

 

NET LOSS (INCOME) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CUBESMART L.P.

 

42,036

 

1,710

 

(363

)

Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

(588

)

107

 

(35

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO OPERATING PARTNER

 

41,448

 

1,817

 

(398

)

Distribution to preferred unitholders

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Basic earnings per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

Basic earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per unit from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Diluted earnings per unit from discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.14

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per unit attributable to common unitholders

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average basic units outstanding

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

Weighted-average diluted units outstanding

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON UNITHOLDERS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

Total discontinued operations

 

31,048

 

16,498

 

15,118

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-14



Table of Contents

CUBESMART, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 (in thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

$

41,994

 

$

3,628

 

$

2,447

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps

 

2,636

 

(13,548

)

(14,477

)

Reclassification of realized losses on interest rate swaps

 

6,266

 

6,082

 

2,083

 

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

56

 

172

 

151

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

8,958

 

(7,294

)

(12,243

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

50,952

 

(3,666

)

(9,796

)

Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

(740

)

445

 

503

 

Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

18

 

(1,927

)

(2,815

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO OPERATING PARTNER

 

$

50,230

 

$

(5,148

)

$

(12,108

)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-15



Table of Contents

CUBESMART, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL

(in thousands)

 

 

Number of
Common OP
Units
Oustanding

 

Number of
Preferred OP
Units
Oustanding

 

Operating Partner

 

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income

 

Total Cubesmart
L.P.
Capital

 

Noncontrolling
Interest in
Subsidiaries

 

Total
Capital

 

Operating
Partnership
interests
of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

98,597

 

 

$

725,337

 

$

(1,121

)

$

724,216

 

$

41,192

 

$

765,408

 

$

45,145

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

Issuance of common OP units, net

 

23,140

 

 

 

204,019

 

 

 

204,019

 

 

 

204,019

 

 

 

Issuance of preferred OP units, net

 

 

 

3,100

 

74,848

 

 

 

74,848

 

 

 

74,848

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted OP units

 

235

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Conversion from OP units to shares

 

63

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

624

 

(624

)

Exercise of OP unit options

 

24

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted OP units

 

 

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

1,677

 

 

 

OP unit compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

1,527

 

 

 

Adjustment for Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

(7,082

)

 

 

(7,082

)

 

 

(7,082

)

7,082

 

Net (loss) income

 

 

 

 

 

(398

)

 

 

(398

)

2,810

 

2,412

 

35

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11,849

)

(11,849

)

 

 

(11,849

)

(545

)

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

139

 

139

 

5

 

144

 

7

 

Preferred OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

Common OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(30,714

)

 

 

(30,714

)

(4,599

)

(35,313

)

(1,368

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

122,059

 

3,100

 

$

968,744

 

$

(12,831

)

$

955,913

 

$

39,409

 

$

995,322

 

$

49,732

 

Issuance of common OP units, net

 

7,900

 

 

 

102,079

 

 

 

102,079

 

 

 

102,079

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted OP units

 

246

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Conversion from OP units to shares

 

1,380

 

 

 

19,247

 

 

 

19,247

 

 

 

19,247

 

(19,247

)

Exercise of OP unit options

 

210

 

 

 

1,629

 

 

 

1,629

 

 

 

1,629

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted OP units

 

 

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

3,352

 

 

 

OP unit compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

1,198

 

 

 

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

(18,452

)

 

 

(18,452

)

(38,532

)

(56,984

)

(132

)

Adjustment for Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

(19,520

)

 

 

(19,520

)

 

 

(19,520

)

19,520

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

1,817

 

 

 

1,817

 

1,918

 

3,735

 

(107

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7,124

)

(7,124

)

 

 

(7,124

)

(342

)

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

159

 

159

 

9

 

168

 

4

 

Preferred OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

Common OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(44,501

)

 

 

(44,501

)

(2,686

)

(47,187

)

(1,438

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

131,795

 

3,100

 

$

1,009,587

 

$

(19,796

)

$

989,791

 

$

118

 

$

989,909

 

$

47,990

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

831

 

831

 

 

 

Issuance of common OP units, net

 

5,700

 

 

 

100,287

 

 

 

100,287

 

 

 

100,287

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted OP units

 

301

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Conversion from OP units to shares

 

1,018

 

 

 

14,698

 

 

 

14,698

 

 

 

14,698

 

(14,698

)

Exercise of OP unit options

 

514

 

 

 

3,710

 

 

 

3,710

 

 

 

3,710

 

 

 

Amortization of restricted OP units

 

 

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

4,747

 

 

 

OP unit compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

870

 

 

 

Adjustment for Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

 

 

 

 

(3,292

)

 

 

(3,292

)

 

 

(3,292

)

3,292

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

41,448

 

 

 

41,448

 

(42

)

41,406

 

588

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains on interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,751

 

8,751

 

 

 

8,751

 

151

 

Unrealized gain on foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31

 

31

 

24

 

55

 

1

 

Preferred OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

(6,008

)

 

 

Common OP unit distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(62,760

)

 

 

(62,760

)

 

 

(62,760

)

(1,049

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

139,328

 

3,100

 

$

1,103,290

 

$

(11,014

)

$

1,092,276

 

$

931

 

$

1,093,207

 

$

36,275

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-16



Table of Contents

CUBESMART, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

41,994

 

$

3,628

 

$

2,447

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

117,074

 

118,573

 

73,702

 

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

(27,440

)

(9,811

)

(3,903

)

Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture

 

 

(7,023

)

 

Equity compensation expense

 

5,617

 

4,550

 

3,204

 

Accretion of fair market value adjustment of debt

 

(1,018

)

(707

)

(89

)

Loan procurement amortization expense - early repayment of debt

 

414

 

 

8,167

 

Equity in losses of real estate ventures

 

1,151

 

745

 

281

 

Changes in other operating accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

(1,156

)

(2,125

)

(585

)

Restricted cash

 

567

 

3,545

 

(853

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

4,564

 

6,899

 

2,634

 

Other liabilities

 

1,095

 

154

 

(678

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

142,862

 

$

118,428

 

$

84,327

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions of storage facilities

 

(181,612

)

(220,791

)

(445,320

)

Additions and improvements to storage facilities

 

(20,320

)

(22,395

)

(25,868

)

Development costs

 

(53,979

)

(4,227

)

 

Cash paid for remaining interest in real estate venture

 

 

(81,158

)

 

Investment in real estate venture, at equity

 

(157,461

)

 

(15,462

)

Cash distributions from real estate venture

 

 

909

 

 

Proceeds from sales of facilities, net

 

123,780

 

52,630

 

44,460

 

Proceeds from notes receivable

 

5,192

 

 

 

Change in restricted cash

 

1,476

 

3,096

 

90

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

$

(282,924

)

$

(271,936

)

$

(442,100

)

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured senior notes

 

247,488

 

249,638

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

636,200

 

403,000

 

256,700

 

Unsecured term loans

 

 

100,000

 

400,000

 

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

 

 

3,537

 

Principal payments on:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility

 

(642,600

)

(358,000

)

(299,700

)

Unsecured term loans

 

(100,000

)

 

(200,000

)

Mortgage loans and notes payable

 

(36,496

)

(236,340

)

(39,321

)

Loan procurement costs

 

(4,400

)

(2,145

)

(5,484

)

Settlement of hedge transactions

 

 

(195

)

 

Proceeds from issuance of common OP units

 

100,290

 

102,079

 

204,019

 

Proceeds from issuance of preferred OP units

 

 

 

74,848

 

Exercise of OP unit options

 

3,710

 

1,629

 

121

 

Contributions from noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

831

 

 

1

 

Cash paid for acquisition of noncontrolling interest

 

 

(61,113

)

 

Distributions paid to common OP unitholders

 

(60,272

)

(41,209

)

(29,171

)

Distributions paid to preferred OP unitholders

 

(6,008

)

(5,724

)

 

Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 

 

(2,686

)

(4,599

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

$

138,743

 

$

148,934

 

$

360,951

 

Change in cash and cash equivalents

 

(1,319

)

(4,574

)

3,178

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

4,495

 

9,069

 

5,891

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

3,176

 

$

4,495

 

$

9,069

 

Supplemental Cash Flow and Noncash Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized

 

$

43,130

 

$

33,578

 

$

33,265

 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidation of real estate venture

 

$

 

$

13,527

 

$

 

Derivative valuation adjustment

 

$

8,902

 

$

(7,271

)

$

(12,394

)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

$

56

 

$

172

 

$

151

 

Discount on issuance of unsecured senior notes

 

$

2,512

 

$

362

 

$

 

Mortgage loan assumption - acquisitions of storage facilites

 

$

8,866

 

$

107,011

 

$

21,827

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-17



Table of Contents

CUBESMART AND CUBESMART L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.  ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

 

U-Store-It Trust,CubeSmart (the “Parent Company”) operates as a Marylandself-managed and self-administered real estate investment trust (collectively(“REIT”) with its subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or the “Company”), is a self-administeredoperations conducted solely through CubeSmart, L.P. and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT, that specializes in acquiring, developing, managing and operating self-storage properties for business and personal use under month-to-month leases.  The Company’s self-storage facilities (collectively, the “Properties”) are located in 26 states throughout the United States, and in the District of Columbia and the UK and are managed under one reportable segment: we own, operate, develop, manage and acquire self-storage facilities.  The Company owns substantially all of its assets and conducts its operations through U-Store-It,subsidiaries.  CubeSmart, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”).  The, operates through an umbrella partnership structure, with the Parent Company, isa Maryland REIT, as its sole general partner.  In the sole genera l partner ofnotes to the consolidated financial statements, we use the terms the “Company,” “we,” or “our” to refer to the Parent Company and the Operating Partnership together, unless the context indicates otherwise.  The Company’s self-storage facilities are located in 20 states throughout the United States and asthe District of Columbia and are presented under one reportable segment: the Company owns, operates, develops, manages and acquires self-storage facilities.

As of December 31, 20102013, the Parent Company owned a 95.4% interest in the Operating Partnership.  The Company manages its owned assets through YSI Management, LLC (the “Management Company”), a wholly owned subsidiaryapproximately 98.4% of the Operating Partnership, and manages assets owned by third parties through Storage Asset Management, LLC, also a wholly owned subsidiarypartnership interests (“OP Units”) of the Operating Partnership.  The Company owns four subsidiaries thatremaining OP Units, consisting exclusively of limited partner interests, are held by persons who contributed their interests in facilities to us in exchange for OP Units.  Under the partnership agreement, these persons have electedthe right to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries.tender their OP Units for redemption to the Operating Partnership at any time for cash equal to the fair value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Parent Company.  In general, a taxable REIT subsidiary, which is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, may perform non-customary services for tenants, hold assets thatlieu of delivering cash, however, the Parent Company, as the Operating Partnership’s general partner, may, at its option, choose to acquire any OP Units so tendered by issuing common shares in exchange for the tendered OP Units.  If the Parent Company so chooses, its common shares will be exchanged for OP Units on a one-for-one basis.  This one-for-one exchange ratio is subject to adjustment to prevent dilution.  With each such exchange or redemption, the Parent Company’s percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase.  In addition, whenever the Parent Company issues common or other classes of its shares, it contributes the net proceeds it receives from the issuance to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership issues to the Parent Company an equal number of OP Units or other partnership interests having preferences and rights that mirror the preferences and rights of the shares issued.  This structure is commonly referred to as an umbrella partnership REIT cannot hold directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate related business.“UPREIT.”

 

2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company, and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries.  The portion of these entities not owned by the Company is presented as noncontrolling interests as of and during the periods consolidated.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

When the Company obtains an economic interest in an entity, the Company evaluates the entity to determine if the entity is deemed a variable interest entity (“VIE”), and if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the FASB on the consolidation of VIEs. When an entity is not deemed to be a VIE, the Company considers the provisions of additional FASB guidance to determine whether a general partner, or the general partners as a group, controls a limited partnership or similar entity when the limited partners have certain rights. The Company consolidates (i) entities that are VIEs and of which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, and (ii) entities that are non-VIEs which the Company controls and which the limited partners do not have the ability to diss olvedissolve or remove the Company without cause nor substantive participating rights.

 

Noncontrolling Interests

The FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements which was effective on January 1, 2009.  The guidance states that noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests.  Under the guidance, such noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.

 

F-18



Table of Contents

However, per the FASB issued authoritative guidance on theclassification and measurement of redeemable securities, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity.  This would result in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions.  Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the FASB issued guidance onaccounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and

F-9



Table of Contents

potentially settled in, a Company’s own stock to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract.  The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests are adjusted each period so that the carrying value equals the greater of its carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or its redemption fair value.

 

The consolidated results of the Company include results attributable to units of the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company.  These interests were issued in the form of Operating Partnership units and were a component of the consideration the Company paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities.  Limited partners who acquired Operating Partnership units have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their Operating Partnership units for, at the Company’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of the Company or cash based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Company.  However, the operating agreement contains certain circumstances that could result in a net cash settlement outside the control of the Company, as the Company does not have the ability to settle in unregistered shares .shares.  Accordingly, consistent with the guidance discussed above, the Company will continue to record these non controllingnoncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss in the consolidated statements of operations.  The Company has adjusted the carrying value of its noncontrolling interests subject to redemption value to the extent applicable.  Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest,interests, the Company hasOperating Partnership reflected these interests at their carryingredemption value as ofat December 31, 2010.2013, as the estimated redemption value exceeded their carrying value. The Operating Partnership recorded an increase to OP Units owned by third parties and a corresponding decrease to capital of $3.3 million at December 31, 2013.  Disclosure of such redemption provisions is provided in note 12.

 

Noncontrolling interests are the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.  The ownership interests in the subsidiary that are held by owners other than the parent are noncontrolling interests. Noncontrolling interests are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity.  On the consolidated statements of operations, revenues, expenses and net income or loss from less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries are reported at the consolidated amounts, including both the amounts attributable to the Company and noncontrolling interests.  Presentation of consolidated equity activity is included for both quarterly and annual financial statements, including beginning balances, activity for the period and ending balances for shareholders’ equity, noncontrolling interests and total equity.  The Company has adjusted the carrying value of its noncontrolling interests subject to redemption value to the extent applicable.  Disclosure of such redemption provisions is provided in Note 7.

 

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout these consolidated financial statements, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported results.  The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions and changes in market conditions could im pactimpact our future operating results.

 

Storage Facilities

Storage facilities are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses.  The cost of storage facilities reflects their purchase price or development cost.  Costs incurred for the acquisition and renovation of a storage facility are capitalized to the Company’s investment in that property.  Ordinaryfacility.  Acquisition costs, ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.  The costs to develop self-storage facilities are capitalized to construction in progress while the project is under development.

 

Purchase Price Allocation

When facilities are acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values.  When a portfolio of facilities is acquired, the purchase price is allocated to the individual facilities based upon the fair value determined using an income approach or a cash flow analysis using appropriate risk adjusted capitalization rates, which take into account the relative size, age and location of the individual facility along with current and projected occupancy and rental rate levels or appraised values, if available.  Allocations to the individual assets and liabilities are based upon comparable market sales information for land, buildings and improvements and estimates of depreciated replacement cost of equipment.

 

F-19



Table of Contents

In allocating the purchase price for an acquisition, the Company determines whether the acquisition includes intangible assets or liabilities.  The Company allocates a portion of the purchase price to an intangible asset attributed to the value of in-place leases.  This intangible is generally amortized to expense over the expected remaining term of the respective leases.  Substantially all of the leases in place at acquired facilities are at market rates, as the majority of the leases are month-to-month contracts.  Accordingly, to date, no portion of the purchase price has been allocated to aboveabove- or

F-10



Table of Contents

below-market lease intangibles.  To date, no intangible asset has been recorded for the value of tenantcustomer relationships, because the Company does not have any concentrations of significant tenantscustomers and the average tenantcustomer turnover is fairly frequent.

 

On April 28, 2010, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The Company recorded the fair value of the assets acquired which includes the intangible value related to the management contracts as other assets, net on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  The average estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.9 million.

During 2008, the Company acquired a self storage facility and allocated approximately $1.0 million to the intangible value of the in-place leases.  This asset represented the value of in-place leases at the time of acquisition and was fully amortized at December 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company acquired 12 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States.   In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $3.7 million.  The estimated life of these in-place leases is 12 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2010 was approximately $0.7 million.

Depreciation and Amortization

The costs of self-storage facilities and improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method based on useful lives ranging from five to 4039 years.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when events and circumstances such as declines in occupancy and operating results indicate that there may be impairment.  The carrying value of these long-lived assets is compared to the undiscounted future net operating cash flows, plus a terminal value, attributable to the assets to determine if the property’sfacility’s basis is recoverable.  If a property’sfacility’s basis is not considered recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent the net carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value.  The impairment loss recognized equals the excess of net carrying value over the related fair value of the asset.  There were no impairment losses recognized in accordance with these procedures during 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

Long-Lived Assets Held for Sale

We consider long-lived assets to be “held for sale” upon satisfaction of the following criteria: (a) management commits to a plan to sell a facility (or group of facilities), (b) the facility is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such facilities, (c) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the facility have been initiated, (d) the sale of the facility is probable and transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, (e) the facility is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value, and (f) actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.

 

Typically these criteria are all met when the relevant asset is under contract, significant non-refundable deposits have been made by the potential buyer, the assets are immediately available for transfer and there are no contingencies related to the sale that may prevent the transaction from closing.  In most transactions, these conditions or criteria are not satisfied until the actual closing of the transaction; accordingly, the facility is not identified as held for sale until the closing actually occurs.  However, each potential transaction is evaluated based on its separate facts and circumstances.  PropertiesFacilities classified as held for sale are reported at the lesser of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

 

During 2010, the Company sold 16 self-storage facilities throughout California and North Carolina.  During 2009, the Company sold 20 self-storage facilities, including one property that was held for sale as of December 31, 2008.  These 2009 sales occurred in multiple states including California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, New Jersey, New Mexico and Ohio.  During 2008, the Company sold 23 storage facilities in multiple states including Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York and Ohio.  These sales have been accounted for as discontinued operations and, accordingly, the accompanying financial statements and notes reflect the results of operations of the storage facilities sold as discontinued operations (see Note 10).

F-11



Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.  The Company may maintain cash equivalents in financial institutions in excess of insured limits, but believes this risk is mitigated by only investing in or through major financial institutions.

 

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of purchase deposits and cash deposits required for debt service requirements, capital replacement, and expense reserves in connection with the requirements of our loan agreements.

 

Loan Procurement Costs

Loan procurement costs related to borrowings were $24.5$17.3 million and $26.4$11.7 million at December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively, and are reported net of accumulated amortization of $8.8$4.6 million and $8.0$3.4 million as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, respectively. The costs are amortized over the estimated life of the related debt using the effective interest method and reported as loan procurement amortization expense.

 

F-20



Table of Contents

Other Assets

Other assets consist primarilyare comprised of accounts receivable from tenants, prepaid expenses and intangible assets. Accounts receivable were $3.2 million and $2.3 millionthe following as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009, respectively. The Company recorded an allowance of approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to accounts receivable as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.  The net carrying value of intangible assets as of December 31, 2010 was $8.1 million.2012 (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization

 

$

9,463

 

$

21,670

 

Deposits on future settlements

 

1,287

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

4,957

 

10,209

 

Prepaid insurance

 

1,304

 

1,805

 

Prepaid real estate taxes

 

1,893

 

1,556

 

Other

 

8,352

 

6,554

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,256

 

$

41,794

 

 

Notes Receivable

As of December 31, 2009, notes receivable of $20.1 million included three promissory notes originated in conjunction withvarious asset dispositions.  The original principal amounts of the promissory notes ranged from $0.3 million to $17.6 million, bearing interest at rates ranging from 6 to 10 percent with maturity dates ranging from two to three years.  All promissory notes were repaid during 2010.

Environmental Costs

Our practice is to conduct or obtain environmental assessments in connection with the acquisition or development of additional facilities.  Whenever the environmental assessment for one of our facilities indicates that a facility is impacted by soil or groundwater contamination from prior owners/operators or other sources, we will work with our environmental consultants and where appropriate, state governmental agencies, to ensure that the facility is either cleaned up, that no cleanup is necessary because the low level of contamination poses no significant risk to public health or the environment, or that the responsibility for cleanup rests with a third party.

 

Revenue Recognition

Management has determined that all of our leases are operating leases.  Rental income is recognized in accordance with the terms of the leases, which generally are month-to-month.

 

The Company recognizes gains onfrom disposition of propertiesfacilities only upon closing in accordance with the guidance on sales of real estate.  Payments received from purchasers prior to closing are recorded as deposits.  Profit on real estate sold is recognized using the full accrual method upon closing when the collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured and the Company is not obligated to perform significant activities after the sale.  Profit may be deferred in whole or part until the sale meets the requirements of profit recognition on sales under this guidance.

 

Advertising and Marketing Costs

The Company incurs advertising and marketing costs primarily attributable to internet marketing campaigns and other media advertisements.  The Company incurred $6.6$7.6 million, $6.5$8.1 million and $6.5$6.9 million in advertising and marketing expenses for the years ended 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008,2011, respectively.

 

Equity Offering Costs

Underwriting discounts and commissions, financial advisory fees and offering costs are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.  For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $0.8 million of equity offering costs related to the issuance of common and preferred shares during the years, respectively.

 

Other Property Related Income

Other property related income consists of late fees, administrative charges, tenant insurance commissions, sales of storage supplies and other ancillary revenues and is recognized in the period that it is earned.

 

F-12



Table of Contents

Capitalized Interest

The Company capitalizes interest incurred that is directly associated with construction activities until the asset is placed into service.  Interest is capitalized to the related assets using a weighted-average rate of the Company’s outstanding debt. The Company capitalized $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $0.1 million during each offor the yearsyear ended 2010, 2009 and 2008.December 31, 2011.

 

F-21



Table of Contents

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company carries all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.  The Company determines the fair value of derivatives by observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.  The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, the reason for holding it.  The Company’s use of derivative instruments has been limited to cash flow hedges of certain interest rate risks.  As of December 31, 2010, the Company had an interest rate cap agreement that effectively limited the LIBOR component of the interest rate on $150 million of credit facility borrowings to 1.50% per annum through January 2011.  Additionally, the Company had interest rate swap agreements for notional pri ncipalprincipal amounts aggregating $300$400 million at December 31, 2008 that matured on November 20, 2009.2013 and 2012, which are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities.

 

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code beginning withsince the period from October 21, 2004 (commencementCompany’s commencement of operations) through December 31,operations in 2004.  In management’s opinion, the requirements to maintain these elections are being met.  Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes has been reflected in the consolidated financial statements other than for operations conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

 

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of distributions to shareholders, differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to differences in cost basis, the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation, and the allocation of net income and loss for financial versus tax reporting purposes.  The net tax basis in the Company’s assets was $1.5$2.2 billion as of December 31, 20102013 and $1.3$1.9 billion as of December 31, 2009.2012.

 

Distributions to shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, the Company provides each of its shareholders a statement detailing the tax characterization of dividends paid during the preceding year as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of the Company’s distributionsdividends for 2010 was 100%2013 consisted of a 55.9082% ordinary income dividends.distribution and a 44.0918% capital gain distribution from earnings and profits.

Distributions to 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shareholders are usually taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of the distribution may be designated as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital.  Annually, the Company provides each of its shareholders a statement detailing preferred distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.  The characterization of our preferred dividends for 2013 consisted of a 65.7893% ordinary income distribution and a 34.2107% capital gain distribution from earnings and profits.

 

The Company is subject to a 4% federal excise tax if sufficient taxable income is not distributed within prescribed time limits.  The excise tax equals 4% of the annual amount, if any, by which the sum of (a) 85% of the Company’s ordinary income, and (b) 95% of the Company’s net capital gaingains and c) 100% of prior taxable income exceeds cash distributions and certain taxes paid by the Company.  No excise tax was incurred in 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, or 2008.2011.

 

Taxable REIT subsidiaries, such as the TRS, are subject to federal and state income taxes.  The TRS recordedOur taxable REIT subsidiaries have a net deferred tax asset related to expenses which are deductible for tax purposes in future periods of $0.3$0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009.2012.

 

Earnings per Share and Unit

Basic earnings per share isand unit are calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares and restricted shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share and unit is calculated by further adjusting for the dilutive impact of share options, unvested restricted shares and contingently issuable shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method.  Potentially dilutive securities calculated under the treasury stock method of 1,177,000, 547,000were 2,551,000, 2,000,000 and 94,0001,378,000 in 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008, respectively,2011, respectively.  The amounts in 2012 and 2011 were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share and unit, as they were identified as anti-dilutive.the impact of inclusion was anti-dilutive for those years.

 

F-22



Table of Contents

Share Based Payments

We apply the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares and share options issued under our incentive award plan.  Accordingly, share compensation expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period relating to such contingently issued shares and options.  The Company has recognized compensation expense on a straight-line method over the requisite service period.

 

F-13



Table of Contents

Foreign Currency

The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. Dollars using the period-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities and an average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, and capital expenditures.  The local currency is the functional currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.  Translation adjustments for foreign subsidiaries are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in shareholders’ equity.  The Company recognizes transaction gains and losses arising from fluctuations in currency exchange rates on transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency in earnings as incurred.  The Pound, which represents the functional currency used by USIFB, LLP, our joint venture in England, was translated at an end-of-period exchange rate of approximately 1.552371.657413 and 1.622 121.625924 U.S. Dollars per Pound at December 31, 20102013 and December 31, 2009,2012, respectively, and an average exchange rate of 1.545761.588598, 1.585074 and 1.564761.603770 U.S. Dollars per Pound for the years ended December 31, 20102013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Accordingly, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on foreign currency translation of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively.2013 and $0.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Ventures

The Company accounts for its investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures under the equity method of accounting.  Under the equity method, investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are recorded initially at cost, as investments in real estate ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings (losses), cash contributions, less distributions. On a periodic basis, management also assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures may be other than temporarily impaired. An investment is impaired only if the fair value of the investment is less than the carrying value of the investment and the decline is other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the fair value of the investment, as estimated by management. The determination as to whether impairment exists requires significant management judgment about the fair value of its ownership interest.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an amendment to the accounting standard for the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”).  The FASB issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assetsin June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidanceamendment requires entities to provide more information regarding salesdisclose for items reclassified out of securitized financial assetsAOCI and similar transactions, particularly ifinto net income in their entirety, the entity has continuing exposureeffect of the reclassification on each affected income statement line item and for AOCI items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income, a cross reference to the risks related to transferred financial assets.  It also eliminates the conceptother required GAAP disclosures.  This amendment became effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The adoption of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.  The applicationthis guidance in 2013 did not have ana material impact on ourthe Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations or cash flows.as its impact was limited to disclosure requirements (see note 9).

 

The FASB issued authoritative guidance on how a company determines when an entity should be consolidated in June 2009, which we adopted on a prospective basis beginning January 1, 2010.  The guidance clarifies that the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.  The guidance requires an ongoing reassessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  It also requires additional disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement.  The application did not have an impact on our consolidated financial posit ion, results of operations or cash flows.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company’s storage facilities are located in major metropolitan and rural areas and have numerous tenantscustomers per facility.  No single tenantcustomer represents a significant concentration of our revenues.  The facilities in New York, Florida, Texas, and California provided total revenues of approximately 17%, 15%, 10% and 9%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The facilities in New York, Florida, California, and Texas provided total revenues of approximately 16%, 15%, 10% and 10%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012.  The facilities in Florida, California, Texas and Illinois provided total revenues of approximately 18%17%, 15%12%, 10% and 7%, respectively, for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

3.  STORAGE FACILITIES

The following summarizes the real estate assets of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Land

 

$

374,569

 

$

369,842

 

Buildings and improvements

 

1,273,938

 

1,243,047

 

Equipment

 

93,571

 

157,452

 

Construction in progress

 

943

 

4,201

 

Total

 

1,743,021

 

1,774,542

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(314,530

)

(344,009

)

Storage facilities — net

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

The Company completed the following acquisitions, dispositions and consolidations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:2011.

 

F-14F-23



Table of Contents

 

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of Facilities

 

Purchase / Sales
Price (in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frisco Asset

 

Frisco, TX

 

July 2010

 

1

 

$

5,800

 

New York City Assets

 

New York, NY

 

September 2010

 

2

 

26,700

 

Northeast Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ, NY and MA

 

November 2010

 

5

 

18,560

 

Manassas Asset

 

Manassas, VA

 

November 2010

 

1

 

6,050

 

Apopka Asset

 

Orlando, FL

 

November 2010

 

1

 

4,235

 

Wyckoff Asset

 

Queens, NY

 

December 2010

 

1

 

13,600

 

McLearen Asset

 

McLearen, VA

 

December 2010

 

1

 

10,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

$

85,145

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sun City Asset

 

Sun City, CA

 

October 2010

 

1

 

$

3,100

 

Inland Empire/Fayetteville Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA amd NC

 

December 2010

 

15

 

35,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

$

38,100

 

2009 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

January 2009

 

1

 

$

2,973

 

Albuquerque, NM Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

April 2009

 

1

 

2,825

 

S. Palmetto Asset

 

Ontario, CA

 

June 2009

 

1

 

5,925

 

Hotel Circle Asset

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

July 2009

 

1

 

3,600

 

Jersey City Asset

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

August 2009

 

1

 

11,625

 

Dale Mabry Asset

 

Tampa, FL

 

August 2009

 

1

 

2,800

 

Winner Assets 1

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

September 2009

 

6

 

17,300

 

Baton Rouge Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

Baton Rouge, LA

 

September 2009

 

 

(b)

1,918

 

North H Street Asset (Eminent Domain)

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

September 2009

 

1

 

 

(c)

Boulder Assets (a)

 

Boulder, CO

 

September 2009

 

4

 

32,000

 

Winner Assets 2

 

Multiple locations in CO

 

October 2009

 

2

 

6,600

 

Brecksville Asset

 

Brecksville, OH

 

November 2009

 

1

 

3,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

90,866

 

2008 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uptown Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

January 2008

 

1

 

$

13,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2008 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

77th Street Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

$

2,175

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, FL

 

March 2008

 

1

 

2,400

 

Lakeland Asset

 

Lakeland, FL

 

April 2008

 

1

 

2,050

 

Endicott Asset

 

Union, NY

 

May 2008

 

1

 

2,250

 

Linden Asset

 

Linden, NJ

 

June 2008

 

1

 

2,825

 

Baton Rouge/Prairieville Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA

 

June 2008

 

2

 

5,400

 

Churchill Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS

 

August 2008

 

4

 

8,333

 

Biloxi/Gulf Breeze Assets

 

Multiple locations in MS/FL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

10,760

 

Deland Asset

 

Deland, FL

 

September 2008

 

1

 

2,780

 

Mobile Assets

 

Mobile, AL

 

September 2008

 

2

 

6,140

 

Hudson Assets

 

Hudson, OH

 

October 2008

 

2

 

2,640

 

Stuart/Vero Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

October 2008

 

2

 

4,550

 

Skipper Road Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2008

 

2

 

5,020

 

Waterway Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

December 2008

 

1

 

4,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

$

61,958

 

3.  STORAGE FACILITIES

The book value of the Company’s real estate assets is summarized as follows:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Land

 

$

465,680

 

$

462,626

 

Buildings and improvements

 

1,888,823

 

1,828,388

 

Equipment

 

158,000

 

143,836

 

Construction in progress

 

41,203

 

8,172

 

Storage facilities

 

2,553,706

 

2,443,022

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(398,536

)

(353,315

)

Storage facilities, net

 

$

2,155,170

 

$

2,089,707

 

 

F-15F-24



Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Company’s acquisition and disposition activity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of
Facilities

 

Purchase / Sale Price
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gilbert Asset

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

March 2013

 

1

 

$

6,900

 

Evanston Asset

 

Evanston, IL

 

May 2013

 

1

 

8,300

 

Delray Beach Asset

 

Delray Beach, FL

 

May 2013

 

1

 

7,150

 

Miramar Asset

 

Miramar, FL

 

June 2013

 

1

 

9,000

 

Stoneham Asset

 

Stoneham, MA

 

June 2013

 

1

 

10,600

 

Maryland/New Jersey Assets

 

Multiple locations in MD and NJ

 

June 2013

 

5

 

52,400

 

Staten Island Asset

 

Staten Island, NY

 

July 2013

 

1

 

13,000

 

Lewisville Asset

 

Lewisville, TX

 

August 2013

 

1

 

10,975

 

Chandler Asset

 

Chandler, AZ

 

September 2013

 

1

 

10,500

 

Tempe Asset

 

Tempe, AZ

 

September 2013

 

1

 

4,300

 

Clinton Asset

 

Clinton, MD

 

November 2013

 

1

 

15,375

 

Katy Asset

 

Katy, TX

 

November 2013

 

1

 

9,700

 

Richmond Asset

 

Richmond, TX

 

December 2013

 

1

 

10,497

 

Dallas Asset

 

Dallas, TX

 

December 2013

 

1

 

6,925

 

Elkridge Asset

 

Elkridge, MD

 

December 2013

 

1

 

8,200

 

Fort Lauderdale Asset

 

Fort Lauderdale, FL

 

December 2013

 

1

 

6,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

$

189,822

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Texas/Indiana Assets

 

Multiple locations in TX and IN

 

March 2013

 

5

 

$

11,400

 

Tennessee Assets

 

Multiple locations in TN

 

August 2013

 

8

 

25,000

 

California/Tennessee/Texas Assets

 

Multiple locations in CA, TN and TX

 

October/November 2013

 

22

 

90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35

 

$

126,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Houston Asset

 

Houston, TX

 

February 2012

 

1

 

$

5,100

 

Dunwoody Asset

 

Dunwoody, GA

 

February 2012

 

1

 

6,900

 

Mansfield Asset

 

Mansfield, TX

 

June 2012

 

1

 

4,970

 

Texas Assets

 

Multiple locations in TX

 

July 2012

 

4

 

18,150

 

Allen Asset

 

Allen, TX

 

July 2012

 

1

 

5,130

 

Norwalk Asset

 

Norwalk, CT

 

July 2012

 

1

 

5,000

 

Storage Deluxe Assets

 

Multiple locations in NY and CT

 

February/April/August 20

12

6

 

201,910

 

Eisenhower Asset

 

Alexandria, VA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

19,750

 

New Jersey Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ

 

August 2012

 

2

 

10,750

 

Georgia/Florida Assets

 

Multiple locations in GA and FL

 

August 2012

 

3

 

13,370

 

Peachtree Asset

 

Peachtree City, GA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

3,100

 

HSREV Assets

 

Multiple locations in PA, NY, NJ, VA and FL

 

September 2012

 

9

 

102,000

 

Leetsdale Asset

 

Denver, CO

 

September 2012

 

1

 

10,600

 

Orlando/West Palm Beach Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL

 

November 2012

 

2

 

13,010

 

Exton/Cherry Hill Assets

 

Multiple locations in NJ and PA

 

December 2012

 

2

 

7,800

 

Carrollton Asset

 

Carrollton, TX

 

December 2012

 

1

 

4,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37

 

$

432,340

 

F-25



Table of Contents

 


(a)The Company provided $17.6 million in seller financing to the buyer as part of the Boulder Assets disposition, which was subsequently repaid during 2010.

(b)Approximately one third of the Baton Rouge Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings.  The Company continues to own and operate the remaining two thirds of the asset and include the asset in the Company’s total portfolio property count.

(c)The entirety of the North H Street Asset was taken in conjunction with eminent domain proceedings and the Company removed this asset from its total portfolio asset count.  The Company expects to finalize compensatory terms with the State of California in 2011.

Facility/Portfolio

 

Location

 

Transaction Date

 

Number of
Facilities

 

Purchase / Sale Price
(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan Assets

 

Multiple locations in MI

 

June 2012

 

3

 

$6,362

 

Gulf Coast Assets

 

Multiple locations in LA, AL and MS

 

June 2012

 

5

 

16,800

 

New Mexico Assets

 

Multiple locations in NM

 

August 2012

 

6

 

7,500

 

San Bernardino Asset

 

San Bernardino, CA

 

August 2012

 

1

 

5,000

 

Florida/ Tennessee Assets

 

Multiple locations in FL and TN

 

November 2012

 

3

 

6,550

 

Ohio Assets

 

Multiple locations in OH

 

November 2012

 

8

 

17,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

$59,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Burke Lake Asset

 

Fairfax Station, VA

 

January 2011

 

1

 

$14,000

 

West Dixie Asset

 

Miami, FL

 

April 2011

 

1

 

13,500

 

White Plains Asset

 

White Plains, NY

 

May 2011

 

1

 

23,000

 

Phoenix Asset

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

May 2011

 

1

 

612

 

Houston Asset

 

Houston, TX

 

June 2011

 

1

 

7,600

 

Duluth Asset

 

Duluth, GA

 

July 2011

 

1

 

2,500

 

Atlanta Assets

 

Atlanta, GA

 

July 2011

 

2

 

6,975

 

District Heights Asset

 

District Heights, MD

 

August 2011

 

1

 

10,400

 

Storage Deluxe Assets

 

Multiple locations in NY, CT and PA

 

November 2011

 

16

 

357,310

 

Leesburg Asset

 

Leesburg, VA

 

November 2011

 

1

 

13,000

 

Washington, DC Asset

 

Washington, DC

 

December 2011

 

1

 

18,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

27

 

$467,147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Dispositions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flagship Assets

 

Multiple locations in IN and OH

 

August 2011

 

18

 

$43,500

 

Portage Asset

 

Portage, MI

 

November 2011

 

1

 

1,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

$45,200

 

 

4.  ACQUISITIONSINVESTMENT ACTIVITY

 

On April 28, 2010,2013 Acquisitions

During 2013, the Company acquired 85 management contracts from United Stor-All Management, LLC (“United Stor-All”).  The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination.  The 85 management contracts relate to20 self-storage facilities located in 16 statesthroughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.8 million. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $13.5 million. The estimated life of these in-place leases was 12 months and the Districtamortization expense that was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $5.3 million. In connection with one of Columbia.  Thethe acquired facilities, the Company assumed mortgage debt, and recorded the debt at a fair value of $8.9 million, which included an outstanding principal balance totaling $8.5 million and a net premium of $0.4 million in addition to the face value of the assumed debt to reflect the fair value of the assetsdebt at the time of assumption.

The following table summarizes the Company’s revenue and earnings of the 2013 and 2012 acquisitions from the respective acquisition dates in the year they were acquired, which includesincluded in the intangible value relatedconsolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Total revenue

 

$

7,048

 

$

19,028

 

Net loss

 

(4,228

)

(11,464

)

Development

During the second quarter of 2013, the Company entered into contracts for the construction of a self-storage facility located in Bronx, NY. Construction is expected to be completed during the management contracts as other assets, netfirst quarter of 2014. At December 31, 2013, development costs for this project totaled $15.6 million. These costs are capitalized to construction in progress while the project is under development and are reflected in Storage facilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  Thesheets.

During 2012, the Company commenced construction of 5 Old Lancaster Road located in Malvern, PA, a suburb of Philadelphia.  Upon completion, the mixed-use facility will be comprised of rentable storage space and office space for the Company’s estimatecorporate headquarters.   During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters to 5 Old Lancaster Road.  Construction is expected to be completed on the portion of the fair valuebuilding comprised of rentable storage space during the acquired assetsfirst quarter of 2014.  At December 31, 2013 and liabilities utilized Level 3 inputs2012, development costs for this mixed-use project totaled $21.4 million and considered$4.7 million, respectively.

F-26



Table of Contents

During the probabilityfourth quarter of 2013, the expected periodCompany entered into contracts under newly-formed joint ventures for the contracts would remainconstruction of three self-storage facilities located in place, including estimated renewal periods,New York and the amount of the discounted estimated future contingent paymentsone self-storage facility located in Virginia (see note 12). Construction for all projects is expected to be made.  The Company paid $4.1 millioncompleted during 2015. At December 31, 2013, development costs for these projects totaled $16.9 million. These costs are capitalized to construction in cash forprogress while the c ontractsprojects are under development and recognized $1.8 millionare reflected in contingent consideration.  The Company records changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability in earnings.  The Company has recognized $0.9 million of amortization during 2010.  The Company expensed $0.3 million in transaction related costs during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that are included in acquisition related costsStorage facilities on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.  The average estimated life of the intangible value of the management contracts is 56 months.balance sheets.

2012 Acquisitions

 

During 2012, as part of the quarter ended March 31, 2008,$560 million Storage Deluxe transaction involving 22 Class A self-storage facilities located primarily in the greater New York City area, the Company acquired the final six facilities with a self storage facilitypurchase price of approximately $201.9 million. The six facilities purchased are located in New York and Connecticut. In connection with the acquisitions, the Company allocated approximately $1.0 milliona portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $12.3 million. The estimated life of these in-place leases was 12 months and the in-place leases.  This asset representedamortization expense that was recognized during 2013 and 2012 was approximately $4.4 million and $7.9 million, respectively. In connection with the six acquired facilities, the Company assumed mortgage debt, and recorded the debt at a fair value of in-place leases$93.1 million, which included an outstanding principal balance totaling $88.9 million and a net premium of $4.2 million in addition to the face value of the assumed debt to reflect the fair values of the debt at the time of acquisition.  The estimated lifeassumption.

On September 28, 2012, the Company purchased, from its joint venture partner, the remaining 50% ownership in a partnership that owned nine storage facilities in Pennsylvania, Virginia, New York, New Jersey and Florida, collectively the HSRE Venture (“HSREV”), for cash of this asset at$21.7 million. In addition, upon taking control of these assets, the timeCompany repaid $59.3 million of acquisition was 12 months.  The Company recognized amortization expensemortgage loans related to this asset of $0.1 million and $0.9 million during 2009 and 2008, respectively.

During 2010,the facilities.  Following the purchase, the Company acquired 12 selfwholly owned the nine storage facilities which were unencumbered and had a fair value of $102 million at acquisition.  In connection with this acquisition, the Company allocated an aggregatea portion of approximately $3.7 millionthe fair value to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $8.3 million. The estimated life of these in-place leases was 12 months and the in-place leases.  These assets representamortization expense that was recognized during 2013 and 2012 was approximately $6.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively.

During 2012, the Company acquired an additional 22 self-storage facilities located throughout the United States for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $128.4 million. In connection with these acquisitions, the Company allocated a portion of the purchase price to the intangible value of in-place leases which aggregated $13.2 million. The estimated life of these in-place leases was 12 months and the amortization expense that was recognized during 2013 and 2012 was approximately $8.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively. In connection with two of the acquired facilities, the Company assumed mortgage debt, and recorded the debt at a fair value of $13.9 million, which included an outstanding principal balance totaling $13.4 million and a net premium of $0.5 million in addition to the face value of the assumed debt to reflect the fair values of the debt at the time of acquisition.  The Company recognized amortization expense related to these assets of $0.7 million during 2010.

Refer to Note 3 for facility details of the 2010, 2009 and 2008 acquisitions.assumption.

 

5. SECURED CREDIT FACILITY,INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE VENTURES

On December 10, 2013, the Company acquired a 50% ownership interest in 35 self-storage facilities located in Texas (34) and North Carolina (1) through a newly-formed joint venture (“HHF”). HHF paid $315.7 million for these facilities. The Company and the unaffiliated joint venture partner, collectively the “HHF Partners,” each contributed cash equal to 50% of the capital required to fund the acquisition. HHF was not consolidated as the entity was not determined to be a VIE and the HHF Partners have equal ownership and voting rights in the entity. The Company accounts for its unconsolidated interest in the real estate venture using the equity method. The Company’s investment in HHF is included in Investment in real estate venture, at equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and earnings attributed to HHF are presented in Equity in losses of real estate ventures on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

On September 26, 2011, the Company contributed $15.4 million in cash for a 50% interest in HSREV, a partnership that owned nine storage facilities in Pennsylvania, Virginia, New York, New Jersey and Florida. The other partner held the remaining 50% interest in the partnership.  HSREV was not consolidated because the Company was not the primary beneficiary, the limited partners had the ability to dissolve or remove the Company without cause and the Company did not possess substantive participating rights.  The Company accounted for the unconsolidated interests in its real estate venture using the equity method.  The Company’s investment in HSREV was included in Investment in real estate ventures, at equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and earnings attributable to HSREV were presented in Equity in losses of real estate ventures on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

F-27



Table of Contents

As explained in note 4, on September 28, 2012, the Company purchased the remaining 50% ownership in HSREV for cash of $21.7 million. In addition, upon taking control of these assets, the Company repaid $59.3 million of mortgage loans related to the facilities.  As noted above, the Company previously accounted for its investment in HSREV using the equity method. As a result, the Company’s original 50% interest was remeasured during 2012 and the Company recorded a gain of approximately $7.0 million, which is reflected in Gain from remeasurement of investment in real estate venture on the accompanying statements of operations.

The amounts reflected in the following tables are based on the historical financial information of the real estate venture.

The following is a summary of the financial position of the HHF venture as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

Assets

 

 

 

Net property

 

$

313,622

 

Other assets

 

623

 

Total Assets

 

$

314,245

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

$

1,625

 

Debt

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

CubeSmart

 

156,310

 

Joint venture partner

 

156,310

 

Total Liabilities and equity

 

$

314,245

 

There were no unconsolidated real estate venture assets at December 31, 2012.

The following is a summary of results of operations of the real estate ventures for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands).

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

1,600

 

$

7,229

 

$

9,354

 

Operating expenses

 

1,742

 

3,010

 

3,879

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

2,690

 

3,969

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,160

 

2,691

 

4,115

 

Net loss

 

(2,302

)

(1,162

)

(2,609

)

Company’s share of net loss

 

(1,151

)

(745

)

(281

)

The results of operations above include the periods from December 13, 2013 (date of acquisition) through December 31, 2013 for HHF, and the periods from September 26, 2011 (date of acquisition) through September 28, 2012 for HSREV, the date of the Company’s acquisition of the remaining 50% interest.

F-28



Table of Contents

6.  UNSECURED SENIOR NOTES

On December 17, 2013, the Operating Partnership issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.375% unsecured senior notes due December 15, 2023 (the “2023 Senior Notes”). On June 26, 2012, the Operating Partnership issued $250 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes due July 15, 2022 (the “2022 Senior Notes”) which bear interest at a rate of 4.80%. The 2023 Senior Notes along with the 2022 Senior Notes are collectively referred to as the “Senior Notes.” The indenture under which the Senior Notes were issued restricts the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to incur debt unless the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a leverage ratio not to exceed 60% and an interest coverage ratio of more than 1.5:1 after giving effect to the incurrence of the debt. The indenture also restricts the ability of the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries to incur secured debt unless the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries comply with a secured debt leverage ratio not to exceed 40% after giving effect to the incurrence of the debt. The indenture also contains other financial and customary covenants, including a covenant not to own unencumbered assets with a value less than 150% of the unsecured indebtedness of the Operating Partnership and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Operating Partnership is currently in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Senior Notes.

7.  REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND SECUREDUNSECURED TERM LOANS

 

On December 8, 2009,June 20, 2011, the Company and its Operating Partnership entered into a three-year, $450 million senior secured credit facility (the “Secured Credit Facility”), consisting of a $200 million securedan unsecured term loan and a $250 million secured revolving credit facility.  The Secured Credit Facility was collateralized by mortgages on “borrowing base properties” (as defined in the Secured Credit Facility agreement).  The Secured Credit Facility replaced the prior, three-year $450 million unsecured credit facility,agreement (the “Term Loan Facility”) which was entered into in November 2006, and consisted of a $200$100 million unsecured term loan with a five-year maturity (“Term Loan A”) and $250a $100 million in unsecured revolving loans.  All borrowings under the unsecured credit facility were repaid in December 2009.

On September 29, 2010, the Company amended the Secured Credit Facility.  The amended credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a $200 million unsecured term loan andwith a $250 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The Credit Facility has a three-year term expiring on December 7, 2013, is unsecured, and borrowings on the facility incur interest based on a borrowing spread based on the Company’s leverage levels plus LIBOR.seven-year maturity (“Term Loan B”).  The Company incurred $2.5costs of $2.1 million in connection with executing this amendmentthe agreement and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

 

AtOn December 31, 2010, $200.09, 2011, the Company entered into a credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) comprised of a $100 million of unsecured term loan borrowingsmaturing in December 2014 (“Term Loan C”); a $200 million unsecured term loan maturing in March 2017 (“Term Loan D”); and $43.0a $300 million of unsecured revolving facility maturing in December 2015 (“Revolver”). The Company incurred costs of $3.4 million in connection with executing the agreement and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the consolidated balance sheet.

On June 18, 2013, the Company amended both the Term Loan Facility and Credit Facility. With respect to the Term Loan Facility, among other things, the amendment extended the maturity and decreased the pricing of Term Loan A, while Term Loan B remained unchanged by the amendment. Pricing on the Term Loan Facility depends on the Company’s unsecured debt credit facility were outstandingratings. At the Company’s current Baa3/BBB- level, amounts drawn under Term Loan A are priced at 1.50% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor, while amounts drawn under Term Loan B are priced at 2.00% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor.

 

 

 

 

Term Loan Facility
Prior to Amendment

 

Term Loan Facility
As Amended

 

 

 

Amount

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Term Loan A

 

$100 million

 

June 2016

 

1.85

%

June 2018

 

1.50

%

Term Loan B

 

$100 million

 

June 2018

 

2.00

%

June 2018

 

2.00

%

With respect to the Credit Facility, among other things, the amendment extended the maturities of the Revolver and $207.0 million was available for borrowingTerm Loan D and decreased the pricing of the Revolver, Term Loan C and Term Loan D. Pricing on the Credit Facility depends on the Company’s unsecured debt credit ratings. At the Company’s current Baa3/BBB- level, amounts drawn under the Credit Facility. Revolver are priced at 1.60% over LIBOR, inclusive of a facility fee of 0.30%, with no LIBOR floor, while amounts drawn under Term Loan C and Term Loan D are priced at 1.50% over LIBOR, with no LIBOR floor.

 

 

 

 

Credit Facility
Prior to Amendment

 

Credit Facility
As Amended

 

 

 

Amount

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Maturity Date

 

LIBOR Spread

 

Revolver

 

$300 million

 

December 2015

 

1.80

%

June 2017

 

1.60

%

Term Loan C (1)

 

$100 million

 

December 2014

 

1.75

%

December 2014

 

1.50

%

Term Loan D

 

$200 million

 

March 2017

 

1.75

%

January 2019

 

1.50

%

 

F-16F-29



Table of Contents

 


(1)On December 17, 2013, the Company repaid the $100 million balance under Term Loan C that was scheduled to mature in December 2014.

The Company incurred costs of $2.1 million in connection with amending the agreements and capitalized such costs as a component of loan procurement costs, net of amortization on the consolidated balance sheet. Unamortized costs, along with costs incurred in connection with the amendments, are amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the modified facilities. In connection with the repayment of Term Loan C, the Company recognized loan procurement amortization expense — early repayment of debt of $0.4 million related to the write-off of unamortized loan procurement costs associated with the term loan.

As of December 31, 2010,2013, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings were outstanding under the Term Loan Facility, $200 million of unsecured term loan borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility, $38.6 million of unsecured revolving credit facility borrowings were outstanding under the Credit Facility and $261.2 million was available for borrowing on the unsecured revolving portion of the Credit Facility. The available balance under the unsecured revolving portion of the Credit Facility is reduced by an outstanding letter of credit of $0.2 million. In connection with a portion of the unsecured borrowings, the Company had interest rate swaps as of December 31, 2013 that fix 30-day LIBOR (see note 10). As of December 31, 2013, borrowings under the Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility, as amended and after giving effect to the interest rate swaps, had aan effective weighted average interest rate of 3.8%3.22%.

The Term Loan Facility and the term loans under the Credit Facility were fully drawn at December 31, 2013 and no further borrowings may be made under the term loans. The Company’s ability to borrow under the revolving portion of the Credit Facility is subject to ongoing compliance with certain financial covenants which include:

·         Maximum total indebtedness to total asset value of 60.0% at any time;

·         Minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.50:1.00; and

·         Minimum tangible net worth of $821,211,200 plus 75% of net proceeds from equity issuances after June 30, 2010.

Further, under the Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility, the Company wasis restricted from paying distributions on the Parent Company’s common shares in excess of the greater of (i) 95% of funds from operations, and (ii) such amount as may be necessary to maintain the Parent Company’s REIT status.

The Company is currently in compliance with all covenants.of its financial covenants and anticipates being in compliance with all of its financial covenants through the terms of the Credit Facility and Term Loan Facility.

 

F-17F-30



Table of Contents

 

6.8.  MORTGAGE LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE

 

The Company’s mortgage loans and notes payable are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Carrying Value as of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Effective

 

Maturity

 

Mortgage Loan

 

2010

 

2009

 

Interest Rate

 

Date

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

YSI 1

 

$

 

$

83,342

 

5.19

%

May-10

 

YSI 4

 

 

6,065

 

5.25

%

Jul-10

 

YSI 26

 

 

9,475

 

5.00

%

Aug-10

 

YSI 25

 

 

7,975

 

5.00

%

Oct-10

 

YSI 2

 

 

83,480

 

5.33

%

Jan-11

 

YSI 12

 

1,477

 

1,520

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI 13

 

1,270

 

1,307

 

5.97

%

Sep-11

 

YSI 6

 

76,137

 

77,370

 

5.13

%

Aug-12

 

YASKY

 

80,000

 

80,000

 

4.96

%

Sep-12

 

YSI 14

 

1,759

 

1,812

 

5.97

%

Jan-13

 

YSI 7

 

3,100

 

3,163

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 8

 

1,771

 

1,808

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 9

 

1,948

 

1,988

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 17

 

4,121

 

4,246

 

6.32

%

Jul-13

 

YSI 27

 

499

 

516

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI 30

 

7,316

 

7,567

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI 11

 

2,420

 

2,486

 

5.87

%

Dec-13

 

USIFB

 

3,726

 

3,834

 

4.80

%

Dec-13

 

YSI 5

 

3,193

 

3,281

 

5.25

%

Jan-14

 

YSI 28

 

1,555

 

1,598

 

5.59

%

Feb-14

 

YSI 34

 

14,823

 

14,955

 

8.00

%

Jun-14

 

YSI 37

 

2,210

 

2,244

 

7.25

%

Aug-14

 

YSI 40

 

2,520

 

2,581

 

7.25

%

Aug-14

 

YSI 44

 

1,095

 

1,121

 

7.00

%

Sep-14

 

YSI 41

 

3,879

 

3,976

 

6.60

%

Sep-14

 

YSI 38

 

3,973

 

4,078

 

6.35

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 45

 

5,443

 

5,527

 

6.75

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 46

 

3,430

 

3,486

 

6.75

%

Oct-14

 

YSI 43

 

2,919

 

2,994

 

6.50

%

Nov-14

 

YSI 48

 

25,270

 

25,652

 

7.25

%

Nov-14

 

YSI 50

 

2,322

 

2,380

 

6.75

%

Dec-14

 

YSI 10

 

4,091

 

4,166

 

5.87

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 15

 

1,877

 

1,920

 

6.41

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 20

 

62,459

 

64,258

 

5.97

%

Nov-15

 

YSI 31

 

13,660

 

13,891

 

6.75

%

Jun-19

(a)

YSI 35

 

4,499

 

4,499

 

6.90

%

Jul-19

(a)

YSI 32

 

6,058

 

6,160

 

6.75

%

Jul-19

(a)

YSI 33

 

11,370

 

11,570

 

6.42

%

Jul-19

 

YSI 42

 

3,184

 

3,263

 

6.88

%

Sep-19

(a)

YSI 39

 

3,931

 

3,991

 

6.50

%

Sep-19

(a)

YSI 47

 

3,176

 

3,250

 

6.63

%

Jan-20

(a)

Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

(24

)

231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

372,457

 

$

569,026

 

 

 

 

 

F-18



Table of Contents

 

 

Carrying Value as of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Effective

 

Maturity

 

Mortgage Loan

 

2013

 

2012

 

Interest Rate

 

Date

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

YSI 7

 

$

 

$

2,962

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 8

 

 

1,692

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 9

 

 

1,862

 

6.50

%

Jun-13

 

YSI 17

 

 

3,846

 

6.32

%

Jul-13

 

YSI 27

 

 

461

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

YSI 30

 

 

6,765

 

5.59

%

Nov-13

 

USIFB

 

 

7,221

 

3.57

%

Dec-13

 

YSI 11

 

 

2,276

 

5.87

%

Jan-14

 

YSI 5

 

 

3,001

 

5.25

%

Jan-14

 

YSI 28

 

 

1,460

 

5.59

%

Mar-14

 

YSI 10

 

3,839

 

3,928

 

5.87

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 15

 

1,733

 

1,784

 

6.41

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 52

 

4,548

 

4,721

 

5.63

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 58

 

8,676

 

8,974

 

2.97

%

Jan-15

 

YSI 29

 

12,853

 

13,060

 

3.69

%

Aug-15

 

YSI 13

 

8,500

 

 

3.00

%

Oct-15

 

YSI 20

 

56,373

 

58,524

 

5.97

%

Nov-15

 

YSI 59

 

9,418

 

9,603

 

4.82

%

Mar-16

 

YSI 60

 

3,670

 

3,725

 

5.04

%

Aug-16

 

YSI 51

 

7,219

 

7,325

 

5.15

%

Sep-16

 

YSI 35

 

4,274

 

4,373

 

6.90

%

Jul-19

(a)

YSI 33

 

10,688

 

10,930

 

6.42

%

Jul-19

 

YSI 26

 

8,945

 

9,102

 

4.56

%

Nov-20

 

YSI 57

 

3,140

 

3,195

 

4.61

%

Nov-20

 

YSI 55

 

24,145

 

24,502

 

4.85

%

Jun-21

 

YSI 24

 

28,523

 

29,141

 

4.64

%

Jun-21

 

Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

3,674

 

4,326

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total mortgage loans and notes payable

 

$

200,218

 

$

228,759

 

 

 

 

 

 


(a)                 These borrowings haveThis borrowing has a fixed interest rate for the first five years of theirthe term, whichand the rate then resets and remains constant over the final five years of the loan term.

 

F-31



Table of Contents

As of December 31, 20102013 and 2009,2012, the Company’s mortgage loans payable were secured by certain of its self-storage facilities with net book values of approximately $540$371 million and $776$440 million, respectively. The following table represents the future principal payment requirements on the outstanding mortgage loans and notes payable at December 31, 20102013 (in thousands):

 

2011

 

$

8,893

 

2012

 

159,984

 

2013

 

29,966

 

2014

 

91,058

 

 

$

5,214

 

2015

 

60,095

 

 

95,397

 

2016 and thereafter

 

22,485

 

2016

 

21,342

 

2017

 

1,915

 

2018

 

2,026

 

2019 and thereafter

 

70,650

 

Total mortgage payments

 

372,481

 

 

196,544

 

Plus: Unamortized fair value adjustment

 

(24

)

 

3,674

 

Total mortgage indebtedness

 

$

372,457

 

 

$

200,218

 

 

The Company currently intends to fund its 2011 future2014 principal payment requirements from cash provided by operating activities.

7.  NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Variable Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

On August 13, 2009, the Company, through a wholly-owned affiliate, formed a joint venture (“HART”) with an affiliate of Heitman, LLC (“Heitman”) to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities, which are located throughout the United States.  Upon formation, Heitman contributed approximately $51activities, new debt originations, and/or additional borrowings under our unsecured Credit Facility ($261.2 million of cash to a newly-formed limited partnership and the Company contributed certain unencumbered wholly-owned properties with an agreed upon value of approximately $102 million to such limited partnership.  In exchange for its contribution of those properties, the Company received a cash distribution from HART of approximately $51 million and retained a 50% interest in HART.  The Company is the managing partner of HART and the manager of the properties owned by HART in exchange for a market rate management fee.

The Company determined that HART is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of HART.  The 50% interest that is owned by Heitman is reflected as noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries within permanent equity, separate from the Company’s equity on the consolidated balance sheets.  At December 31, 2010, HART had total assets of $89.5 million, including $87.3 million of storage facilities, net and total liabilities of $2.3 million.

USIFB, LLP (“the Venture”) was formed to own, operate, acquire and develop self-storage facilities in England.  The Company owns a 97% interest in the Venture through a wholly-owned subsidiary and the Venture commenced operations at two facilities in London, England during 2008.  The Company determined that the Venture is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the Venture.  At December 31, 2010, the Venture had total assets of $11.3 million and total liabilities of $4.0 million including a mortgage loan of $3.7 million secured by storage facilities with a net book value of $3.5 million.  At December 31, 2010, the Venture’s creditors had no recourse to the general credit of the Company.

Operating Partnership Ownership

The Company has followed the FASB guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities.  Under this guidance, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets, at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity.  This classification results in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to

F-19



Table of Contents

redemption provisions.  Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the redemption by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the guidance regarding accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own shares, to evaluate whether the Company controls the actions or events necessary to presume share settlement.  The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests classified outside of permanent equity be adjusted each period to the greater of the carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or the redemption value.

The consolidated results of the Company include results attributable to units of the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Company, which amounted to approximately 4.6% of all outstanding Operating Partnership unitsavailable as of December 31, 2010 and 4.9% of all outstanding Operating Partnership units as of December 31, 2009.  The interests in the Operating Partnership represented by these units were a component of the consideration that the Company paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities.  The holders of the units are limited partners in the Operating Partnership and have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their units for, at the Company’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of the Company or cash based upon the fair value of an equivalent number of common shares of the Company.  However, the partnership agreement contains certain provisions that could result in a settlement outside the control of the Company, as the Company does not have the ability to settle in unregistered shares.  Accordingly, consistent with the guidance, the Company will record these noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets.  Net income or loss related to these noncontrolling interests is excluded from net income or loss attributable to the Company in the consolidated statements of operations.

The per unit cash redemption amount would equal the average of the closing prices of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 trading days ending prior to the Company’s receipt of the redemption notice for the applicable unit.  At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 4,737,136 and 4,809,636 units were outstanding, respectively, and the calculated aggregate redemption value of outstanding Operating Partnership units based upon the Company’s average closing share prices.  Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interest, the Company has reflected these interests at their redemption value as of December 31, 2010, as the estimated redemption value exceeded their carrying value at December 31, 2010, by recording a $1.5 million increase to non-controlling interests w ith a corresponding decrease to shareholders’ equity.  As of December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the noncontrolling interests exceeded the estimated redemption value so no adjustment was required.

8.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Corporate Office Leases

Subsequent to its entry into lease agreements with related parties for office space, the Operating Partnership entered into sublease agreements with various unrelated tenants for the related office space.  Each of these properties is part of Airport Executive Park, a 50-acre office and flex development located in Cleveland, Ohio, which is owned by former executives. Our independent Trustees approved the terms of, and entry into, each of the office lease agreements by the Operating Partnership.  The table below shows the office space subject to these lease agreements and certain key provisions, including the term of each lease agreement, the period for which the Operating Partnership may extend the term of each lease agreement, and the minimum and maximum rents payable per month during the term.

Office Space

 

Approximate
Square Footage

 

Term

 

Period of
Extension Option (1)

 

Fixed Minimum
Rent Per Month

 

Fixed
Maximum Rent
Per Month

 

The Parkview Building — 6745 Engle Road; and 6751 Engle Road

 

21,900

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

25,673

 

$

31,205

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 100

 

2,212

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,051

 

$

3,709

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 110

 

1,731

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

2,387

 

$

2,901

 

6751 Engle Road — Suites C and D

 

3,000

 

12/31/2014

 

Five-year

 

$

3,137

 

$

3,771

 


(1)Our Operating Partnership may extend the lease agreement beyond the termination date by the period set forth in this column at prevailing market rates upon the same terms and conditions contained in each of the lease agreements.

In addition to monthly rent, the office lease agreements provide that our Operating Partnership reimburse for certain maintenance and improvements to the leased office space.  The total amounts of lease payments incurred under the six office

F-20



Table of Contents

leases during the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were approximately $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Total future minimum rental payments due in accordance with the related party lease agreements and total future cash receipts due from our subtenants as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:

 

 

Due to Related Party

 

Due from Subtenant

 

 

 

Amount

 

Amount

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

$

475

 

$

314

 

2012

 

475

 

314

 

2013

 

499

 

314

 

2014

 

499

 

315

 

 

 

$

1,948

 

$

1,257

 

Other

During the third quarter of 2009, the Company entered into a relocation transaction with a member of management whereby the Company purchased the former residence of the member of management for $985,000 which was recorded as a component of other assets.  The Company sold the asset on September 10, 2010.2013).

 

9.  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The fair values of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates their respective book values at December 31, 2010 and 2009.  The Company had fixed interest rate loans with a carrying value of $372.5 million and $569.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The estimated fair values of these fixed rate loans were $351.8 million and $530.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The Company had variable interest rate loans with a carrying value of $243.0 million and $200.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The estimated fair values of the variable interest rate loans approximate their carrying values due to their floating rate nature and market spreads.  These estimates are based on discounted cash flow analyses assuming market intere st rates for comparable obligations at December 31, 2010 and 2009.

10.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, discontinued operations relates to 16 properties that the Company sold during 2010, 20 properties that the Company sold during 2009 (one of which was held-for-sale at December 31, 2008), and 23 properties that the Company sold during 2008 (see Note 3).  Each of the sales during 2010, 2009, and 2008 resulted in the recognition of a gain, which in the aggregate totaled $1.8 million, $14.1 million, and $19.7 million, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes the revenue and expense informationchanges in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the period the Company owned the properties classified as discontinued operations during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Unrealized losses
on interest rate
swaps

 

Unrealized loss on
foreign currency
translation

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

(18,973

)

$

(823

)

$

(19,796

)

Other comprehensive gain before reclassifications

 

2,591

 

31

 

2,622

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

6,160

(a)

 

6,160

 

Net current-period other comprehensive income

 

8,751

 

31

 

8,782

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

(10,222

)

$

(792

)

$

(11,014

)

F-21



Table of Contents(a)

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

5,707

 

$

13,496

 

$

23,775

 

Other property related income

 

591

 

1,131

 

1,829

 

Total revenues

 

6,298

 

14,627

 

25,604

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

2,581

 

5,352

 

9,499

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,711

 

4,444

 

6,886

 

Total operating expenses

 

4,292

 

9,796

 

16,385

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

2,006

 

4,831

 

9,219

 

Net gain on disposition of discontinued operations

 

1,826

 

14,139

 

19,720

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

3,832

 

$

18,970

 

$

28,939

 

11.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company currently owns one self-storage facility subject to a ground lease and five self-storage facilities having parcels of land that are subject to ground leases. The Company recorded ground rent expense of approximately $0.2 millionSee note 10 for eachadditional information about the effects of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.  Total future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable ground leases are $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2014.

The Company has been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits in the ordinary course of business.  In most instances, these claims are covered by the Company’s liability insurance coverage.  Management believes that the ultimate settlement of the suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.amounts reclassified.

 

12.10.  RISK MANAGEMENT AND USE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate agreements or other instruments to manage interest rate risk exposures and not for speculative purposes. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure, as well as to hedge specific transactions. The counterparties to these arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its subsidiaries may also have other financial relationships. The Company is potentially exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by these counterparties. However, because of the high credit ratings of the counterparties, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet these obligations as they come due. The Company does not hed gehedge credit or property value market risks.

 

The Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements that qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges designed to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on its variable rate debt.  Therefore, the interest rate swaps are recorded in the consolidated balance sheetssheet at fair value and the related gains or losses are deferred in shareholders’ equity as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.accumulated other comprehensive loss.  These deferred gains and losses are amortized into interest expense during the period or periods in which the related interest payments affect earnings.  However, to the extent that the interest rate swaps are not perfectly effective in offsetting the change in value of the interest payments being hedged, the ineffective portion of these contracts is recognized in earnings immediately.  Ineffectiveness was immaterial for all periods presented.

F-32



Table of Contents

 

The Company formally assesses, both at inception of thea hedge and on an on-going basis, whether each derivative is highly-effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item. If management determines that a derivative is highly-effective as a hedge, itthen the Company accounts for the derivative using hedge accounting, pursuant to which gains or losses inherent in the derivative do not impact the Company’s results of operations.  If management determines that a derivative is not highly-effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a highly-effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively and will reflect in its statementsstatement of operations realized and unrealized gains and losses in respect of the derivative.

 

F-22The following table summarizes the terms and fair values of the Company’s derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (dollars in thousands):

Hedge

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

Product

 

Hedge Type (a)

 

Amount

 

Strike

 

Effective Date

 

Maturity

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

40,000

 

1.8025

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2016

 

$

(1,265

)

$

(1,873

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

40,000

 

1.8025

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2016

 

(1,265

)

(1,875

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

20,000

 

1.8025

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2016

 

(632

)

(937

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

75,000

 

1.3360

%

12/30/2011

 

3/31/2017

 

(1,132

)

(2,378

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

50,000

 

1.3360

%

12/30/2011

 

3/31/2017

 

(752

)

(1,583

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

50,000

 

1.3360

%

12/30/2011

 

3/31/2017

 

(754

)

(1,583

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

25,000

 

1.3375

%

12/30/2011

 

3/31/2017

 

(380

)

(799

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

40,000

 

2.4590

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2018

 

(1,820

)

(3,433

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

40,000

 

2.4725

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2018

 

(1,842

)

(3,470

)

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

20,000

 

2.4750

%

6/20/2011

 

6/20/2018

 

(921

)

(1,734

)

 

 

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(10,763

)

$

(19,665

)



Table of Contents(a)Hedging unsecured variable rate debt by fixing 30-day LIBOR.

 

The Company measures its derivative instruments at fair value and records them in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability.  As of December 31, 2010,2013 and 2012, all derivative instruments were included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the Company had anaccompanying consolidated balance sheets.  The effective portions of changes in the fair value of the derivatives are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).  Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt.  The change in unrealized loss on interest rate cap agreement that effectively limited the LIBOR componentswap reflects a reclassification of the interest rate on $150$6.2 million of credit facility borrowingsunrealized losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an increase to 1.50% per annum through January 2011.interest expense during 2013.  The following table includes all other hedge activity during 2009 and 2010 (dollarsCompany estimates that $6.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense in thousands).2014.

Hedge

 

 

 

Notional

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Product

 

Hedge Type

 

Amount

 

Strike

 

Effective Date

 

Maturity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

$

50,000

 

4.7725

%

8/24/2007

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

25,000

 

4.7160

%

9/4/2007

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

25,000

 

2.3400

%

3/28/2008

 

11/20/2009

 

Swap

 

Cash flow

 

200,000

 

2.7625

%

5/28/2008

 

11/20/2009

 

 

13.11.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

As stated in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” on January 1, 2008, theThe Company adoptedapplies the methods of determining fair value, as described in authoritative guidance, issued by the FASB, to value its financial assets and liabilities. As defined in the guidance, fair value is based on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

 

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

 

F-33



Table of Contents

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 

In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs, to the extent possible, as well as considering counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

 

There were no financialFinancial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 20102013 are classified in the table below in one of the three categories described above (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Liabilities

 

$

 

$

10,763

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

 

$

10,763

 

$

 

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2012 are classified in the table below in one of the three categories described above (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Liabilities

 

$

 

$

19,665

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

 

$

19,665

 

$

 

Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value were classified as Level 2 inputs.  For financial liabilities that utilize Level 2 inputs, the Company utilizes both direct and indirect observable price quotes, including LIBOR yield curves, bank price quotes for forward starting swaps, NYMEX futures pricing and common stock price quotes. Below is a summary of valuation techniques for Level 2 financial liabilities:

·Interest rate swap derivative assets and liabilities — valued using LIBOR yield curves at the reporting date. Counterparties to these contracts are most often highly rated financial institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades in 2013 that would reduce the amount owed by the Company.  Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with the Company’s derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and the counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the effect of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

During 2012, the Company recorded a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurement gain of approximately $7.0 million resulting from the remeasurement of its investment in HSREV (see note 5).  Fair value for those assets measured using Level 3 inputs was determined through the use of a direct capitalization approach. The direct capitalization approach applies a projected yield for the investment to the estimated stabilized income for the facility.  Yield rates utilized in this approach are derived from market transactions as well as other financial and industry data. The yield rates used in determining the fair value of HSREV ranged from 6%-7%.

The fair values of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their respective carrying values at December 31, 2013 and 2012.  The aggregate carrying value of the Company’s debt was $1,138.8 million and $1,023.8 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt was $1,140.9 million and $1,017.3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These estimates were based on a discounted cash flow analysis assuming market interest rates for comparable obligations at December 31, 2013 and 2012.  The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt and the credit spreads over variable market rates on its variable rate debt by discounting the future cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates or 2009.credit spreads consistent with the maturity of the debt obligation with similar credit policies, which is classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Rates and credit spreads take into consideration general market conditions and maturity.

F-34



Table of Contents

12.  NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Interests in Consolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

251 Jamaica Ave, LLC (“Jamaica Ave”) was formed to own, operate, and develop a self-storage facility in New York, NY.  The Company owns a 51% interest in Jamaica Ave and 49% is owned by another member (“Jamaica Ave Member”).  The facility is expected to commence operations during 2015.  The Jamaica Ave member has an option to put its ownership interest in the venture to the Company for $12.5 million within a year after the construction of the facility is substantially complete.  Additionally, the Company has a one-year option to call the ownership interest of Jamaica Ave Member for $12.5 million starting for a year period beginning on the second anniversary of the facility’s construction being substantially complete.  The Company determined that Jamaica Ave is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of Jamaica Ave.  At December 31, 2013, Jamaica Ave had total assets of $6.3 million.

The Company formed two entities, collectively known as “SNL”, with a partner to own, operate and develop two self-storage facilities in the boroughs of New York, NY.  The Company owns 90% of SNL and the facilities are expected to commence operations during 2015.  The Company consolidates the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of SNL.  At December 31, 2013, SNL had total assets of $3.8 million and total liabilities of $0.1 million.

Shirlington Rd, LLC (“SRLLC”) was formed to own, operate, and develop a self-storage facility in Northern Virginia.  The Company owns a 90% interest in SRLLC and the facility is expected to commence operations during 2015.  The Company consolidates the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of SRLLC.  At December 31, 2013, SRLLC had total assets of $13.6 million and total liabilities of $9.1 million.  The Company provided a $9.0 million loan secured by a mortgage on the real estate assets of SRLLC.  The loan and any related interest was eliminated during consolidation.

USIFB, LLP (“USIFB”) was formed to own, operate, acquire and develop self-storage facilities in England.  The Company owns a 97% interest in the USIFB through a wholly-owned subsidiary and USIFB commenced operations at two facilities in London, England during 2008.  The Company determined that USIFB is a variable interest entity, and that the Company is the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of operations of USIFB.  At December 31, 2013, USIFB had total assets of $11.8 million and total liabilities of $7.1 million.  On December 31, 2013 the Company provided a $6.8 million (£4.1 million) loan secured by a mortgage on real estate assets of USIFB.  The loan and any related interest was eliminated during consolidation.

On August 13, 2009, the Company, through a wholly-owned affiliate, formed a joint venture (“HART”) with an affiliate of Heitman, LLC (“Heitman”) to own and operate 22 self-storage facilities, which are located throughout the United States.  Upon formation, Heitman contributed approximately $51 million of cash to a newly-formed limited partnership and the Company contributed certain unencumbered wholly-owned facilities with an agreed upon value of approximately $102 million to such limited partnership.  In exchange for its contribution of those facilities, the Company received a cash distribution from HART of approximately $51 million and retained a 50% interest in HART.  The Company was the managing partner of HART and managed the facilities owned by HART in exchange for a market rate management fee.  The Company determined that HART was a variable interest entity, and that the Company was the primary beneficiary.  Accordingly, the Company consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of HART.  The 50% interest that was owned by Heitman was reflected as noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries within permanent equity, separate from the Company’s equity on the consolidated balance sheets.

On August 13, 2012, the Company purchased the remaining 50% interest in HART from Heitman for $61.1 million, and now owns 100% of HART. Accordingly, the Company wholly owns the facilities which are unencumbered by any property-level secured debt.  The Company previously consolidated HART, and therefore the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest is reflected in the equity section of the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  As a result of the transaction, the Company eliminated noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries of $38.7 million and recorded a reduction to additional paid in capital of $18.5 million.

F-35



Table of Contents

Operating Partnership Ownership

The Company follows guidance regarding the classification and measurement of redeemable securities.  Under this guidance, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets, at the option of the holder and not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity/capital.  This classification results in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity/capital in the consolidated balance sheets.  The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions.

Additionally, with respect to redeemable ownership interests in the Operating Partnership held by third parties for which CubeSmart has a choice to settle the redemption by delivery of its own shares, the Operating Partnership considered the guidance regarding accounting for derivative financial instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in, a company’s own shares, to evaluate whether CubeSmart controls the actions or events necessary to presume share settlement. The guidance also requires that noncontrolling interests classified outside of permanent capital be adjusted each period to the greater of the carrying value based on the accumulation of historical cost or the redemption value.

Approximately 1.6% and 2.4% of the outstanding OP Units as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were not owned by CubeSmart, the sole general partner.  The interests in the Operating Partnership represented by these OP Units were a component of the consideration that the Operating Partnership paid to acquire certain self-storage facilities. The holders of the OP Units are limited partners in the Operating Partnership and have the right to require CubeSmart to redeem all or part of their OP Units for, at the general partner’s option, an equivalent number of common shares of CubeSmart or cash based upon the fair value of an equivalent number of common shares of CubeSmart.  However, the partnership agreement contains certain provisions that could result in a settlement outside the control of CubeSmart and the Operating Partnership, as CubeSmart does not have the ability to settle in unregistered shares.  Accordingly, consistent with the guidance, the Operating Partnership will record the OP Units owned by third parties outside of permanent capital in the consolidated balance sheets. Net income or loss related to the OP Units owned by third parties is excluded from net income or loss attributable to Operating Partner in the consolidated statements of operations.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, 2,275,730 and 3,293,730 OP units, respectively, were outstanding.  The per Unit cash redemption amount of the outstanding OP units was calculated based upon the average of the closing prices of the common shares of CubeSmart on the New York Stock Exchange for the final 10 trading days of the year. Based on the Company’s evaluation of the redemption value of the redeemable noncontrolling interests, the Company has reflected these interests at their redemption value at December 31, 2013 and 2012, as the estimated redemption value exceeded their carrying value. The Operating Partnership recorded an increase to OP Units owned by third parties and a corresponding decrease to capital of $3.3 million and $19.5 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

13.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Affiliated Real Estate Investments

The Company provides management services to certain joint ventures and other related party facilities.  Management agreements provide generally for management fees of between 5-6% of cash collected of total revenue of the facilities.  Total management fees for unconsolidated joint ventures or other entities of which the Company had an ownership interest in for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 respectively, were $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

The management agreements for certain joint ventures, other related parties and third-party facilities provide for the reimbursement to the Company for certain expenses incurred to manage the facilities.  These amounts consist of amounts due for management fees, payroll, and other expenses incurred on behalf of the facilities.  The amounts due to the Company were $2.1 million and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Additionally, as discussed in note 12 the Company has outstanding mortgage loans receivable from consolidated joint ventures of $15.8 million as of December 31, 2013 that are eliminated for consolidation purposes.  The Company believes that all of these related-party receivables are fully collectible.

F-36



Table of Contents

Corporate Office Leases

Subsequent to its entry into lease agreements with related parties for office space, the Operating Partnership entered into sublease agreements with various unrelated tenants for the related office space.  Each of these properties is part of Airport Executive Park, a 50-acre office and flex development located in Cleveland, Ohio, which is owned by former executives. Our independent Trustees approved the terms of, and entry into, each of the office lease agreements by the Operating Partnership.  The table below shows the office space subject to these lease agreements and certain key provisions, including the term of each lease agreement, the period for which the Operating Partnership may extend the term of each lease agreement, and the minimum and maximum rents payable per month during the term.

Office Space

 

Approximate
Square Footage

 

Maturity Date

 

Fixed Minimum
Rent Per Month

 

Fixed
Maximum Rent
Per Month

 

The Parkview Building — 6745 Engle Road; and 6751 Engle Road

 

21,900

 

12/31/2014

 

$

25,673

 

$

31,205

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 100

 

2,212

 

12/31/2014

 

$

3,051

 

$

3,709

 

6745 Engle Road — Suite 110

 

1,731

 

12/31/2014

 

$

2,387

 

$

2,901

 

6751 Engle Road — Suites C and D

 

3,000

 

12/31/2014

 

$

3,137

 

$

3,771

 


(1)Our Operating Partnership may extend the lease agreement beyond the termination date by the period set forth in this column at prevailing market rates upon the same terms and conditions contained in each of the lease agreements.

In addition to monthly rent, the office lease agreements provide that our Operating Partnership reimburse for certain maintenance and improvements to the leased office space.  The aggregate amount of lease payments incurred under these lease agreements for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was approximately $0.5 million.

Total future minimum rental payments due in accordance with the related party lease agreements are $0.5 million and total future cash receipts due from our subtenants are $0.3 million as of December 31, 2013.

 

14.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company currently owns five operating self-storage facilities and one self-storage facility currently under development that are subject to ground leases and four other operating self-storage facilities having portions of land that are subject to ground leases. The Company recorded ground rent expense of approximately $2.2 million, $1.2 million, and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  Total future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable ground leases are as follows:

 

 

Ground Lease

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

1,329

 

2015

 

1,336

 

2016

 

1,329

 

2017

 

1,329

 

2018

 

1,242

 

2019 and thereafter

 

64,836

 

 

 

$

71,401

 

The Company has development agreements for the construction of five new self-storage facilities (see note 4), which will require payments of approximately $54.3 million, due in installments upon completion of certain construction milestones, during 2014 and 2015.

F-37



Table of Contents

The Company has been named as a defendant in lawsuits in the ordinary course of business.  In most instances, these claims are covered by the Company’s liability insurance coverage.  Management believes that the ultimate settlement of the suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

15.  SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

 

On June 2, 2010 the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, a share-based employee compensation plan originally approved by shareholders on May 8, 2007 (as amended and restated, the “2007 Plan”).  On October 19, 2004, the Company’s sole shareholder approved a share-based employee compensation plan, the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan” and collectively with the 2007 Plan, the “Plans”).  The purpose of the Plans is to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, Trustees and key employees and other persons and to motivate such officers, Trustees, key employees and other persons to serve the Company and its affiliates to expend maximum effort to improve the business results and earnings of the Company, by providing to such persons an opportunity to acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in the operations and future success of the Company.  To this end, the Plans provide for the grant of share options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, share units, unrestricted shares, dividend equivalent rights and cash awards.  Any of these awards may, but need not, be made as performance incentives to reward attainment of annual or long-term performance goals.  Share options granted under the Plans may be non-qualified share options or incentive share options.

 

The Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Trustees (the “Compensation Committee”), which is appointed by the Board of Trustees. The Compensation Committee interprets the Plans and, subject to its right to delegate authority to grant awards, determines the terms and provisions of option grants and share awards.

 

The 2007 Plan uses a “Fungible Units” methodology for computing the maximum number of common shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan.  The Fungible Units methodology assigns weighted values to different types of awards under the 2007 Plan without assigning specific numerical limits for different types of awards.  Upon shareholder approval of the

F-23



Table of Contents

amendment and restatement of the 2007 planPlan in June 2010, a “Fungible Pool Limit” was established consisting of 4,728,561 shares plus any common shares restored to availability upon expiration or forfeiture of then-currently outstanding options or restricted share awards (consisting of 372,135 shares).

 

The 2007 Plan provides that any common shares made the subject of awards in the form of options or share appreciation rights shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as one (1) unit.  Any common shares made the subject of awards under the 2007 Plan in the form of restricted shares or share units (each a “Full-Value Award”) shall be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 1.66 units.  The Fungible Pool Limit and the computation of the number of common shares available for issuance are subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, including share splits, reverse share splits and recapitalizations.  The number of shares counted against the Fungible Pool Limit includes the full number of shares subject to the award, and is not reduced in the event shares are withheld to fund withholding tax obligations, or, in the case of options and share appreciation rights, where shares are applied to pay the exercise price.  If an option or other award granted under the 2007 Plan expires, is forfeited or otherwise terminates, the common shares subject to any portion of such option or other award that expires, is forfeited or that otherwise terminates, as the case may be, will again become available for the issuance under the 2007 Plan.

 

In addition to the overall limit on the number of shares that may be subject to awards under the 2007 Plan, the 2007 Plan limits the number of shares that may be the subject of awards during the three-year period ending December 31, 2012.2013.  Specifically, the average of the following three ratios (each expressed as a percentage) shall not exceed the greater of two percent (2%) or the mean of the Company’s GICS peer group for the three-year period beginning January 1, 20102011 and ending December 31, 2012.2013.  The three ratios would correspond to the three calendar years in the three-year period ending December 31, 2012,2013, and each ratio would be computed as (i) the number of shares subject to awards granted in the applicable year divided by (ii) the sum of the number of common shares and units of the Company’s operating partnership (“OP Units”) exchangeable into common shares outstanding at the end of such year.  Solely for purposes of calculating the number of shares subject to awards under this limitation, shares underlying Full-Value Awards will be taken into account in the numerator of the foregoing ratios as 1.5 shares.

 

Subject to adjustment upon certain corporate transactions or events, a participant may not receive awards (with shares subject to awards being counted, depending on the type of award, in the proportions ranging from 1.0 to 1.66), as described above in any one calendar year covering more than 1,000,000 shares.units.

F-38



Table of Contents

 

With respect to the 2004 Plan, a total of 3,000,0003 million common shares are reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan. The maximum number of common shares underlying equity awards that may be granted to an individual participant under the 2004 Plan during any calendar year is 400,000 for options or share appreciation rights and 100,000 for restricted shares or restricted share units. The maximum number of common shares that can be awarded under the Plan to any person, other than pursuant to an option, share appreciation rights or time-vested restricted shares, is 250,000 per calendar year under the 2004 Plan.  To the extent that options expire unexercised or are terminated, surrendered or canceled, the options and share awards become available for future grants under the 2004 Plan, unless the 2004 Plan has been terminated.

 

Under the Plans, the Compensation Committee determines the vesting schedule of each share award and option. The exercise price for options is equivalent to the fair value of the underlying common shares at the grant date. The Compensation Committee also determines the term of each option, which shall not exceed 10 years from the grant date.

Share Options

 

The fair values for options granted in 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011 were estimated at the time the options were granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model applying the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Assumptions:

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

3.7

%

2.6

%

3.4

%

 

1.0

%

2.0

%

3.3

%

Expected dividend yield

 

5.4

%

5.5

%

6.9

%

 

3.3

%

4.5

%

4.8

%

Volatility (a)

 

57.60

%

46.49

%

27.3

%

 

42.00

%

52.22

%

54.60

%

Weighted average expected life of the options (b)

 

9.9 years

 

9.8 years

 

9.0 years

 

 

6.0 years

 

9.59 years

 

9.9 years

 

Weighted average grate date fair value of options granted per share

 

$

2.60

 

$

1.02

 

$

1.09

 

Weighted average grant date fair value of options granted per share

 

$

4.28

 

$

3.94

 

$

3.40

 

 


(a)  Expected volatility is based upon the level of volatility historically experienced.

(b)  Expected life is based upon our expectations of stockshare option recipients’ expected exercise and termination patterns.

F-24



Table of Contents

 

The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options. In addition, option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stockshare price volatility. Volatility for the 2008, 2009,2011, 2012, and 20102013 grants was based on the trading history of the Company’s shares.

 

In 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 2008,2011, the Company recognized compensation expense related to options issued to employees and executives of approximately $1.9$0.9 million, $1.8$1.2 million and $1.4$1.5 million, respectively, which was recorded in general and administrative expense.  Approximately 575,000182,297 share options were issued during 20102013 for which the fair value of the options at their respective grant dates was approximately $1.5$0.8 million, which vest over three and five years.  As of December 31, 2010,2013, the Company had approximately $2.0$0.9 million of unrecognized option compensation cost related to all grants that will be recorded over the next fivefour years.

F-39



Table of Contents

 

The table below summarizes the option activity under the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008:2011:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Number of Shares

 

Weighted Average

 

Remaining

 

 

Under Option

 

Exercise Price

 

Contractual Term

 

 

Under Option

 

Strike Price

 

Contractual Term

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

1,916,771

 

$

18.95

 

8.74

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

7.18

 

Options granted

 

2,400,990

 

9.43

 

9.09

 

 

346,882

 

9.38

 

9.11

 

Options canceled

 

(1,006,662

)

13.08

 

 

 

(80,924

)

9.40

 

 

Options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

(24,000

)

5.06

 

6.84

 

Balance at December 31, 2008

 

3,311,099

 

$

13.84

 

8.42

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

5,255,718

 

$

10.35

 

6.33

 

Options granted

 

1,456,881

 

3.75

 

9.09

 

 

222,421

 

11.48

 

9.14

 

Options canceled

 

(221,676

)

11.73

 

 

 

(10,375

)

9.01

 

 

Options exercised

 

 

 

 

 

(209,900

)

7.89

 

6.08

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

 

4,546,304

 

$

10.71

 

7.95

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

5,257,864

 

$

10.50

 

5.49

 

Options granted

 

574,556

 

7.32

 

9.06

 

 

182,297

 

14.84

 

9.08

 

Options canceled

 

(50,875

)

12.71

 

 

 

(24,000

)

13.57

 

 

Options exercised

 

(56,225

)

3.46

 

8.11

 

 

(511,548

)

7.24

 

4.53

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

7.18

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

4,904,613

 

$

10.99

 

4.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2010

 

5,013,760

 

$

10.38

 

7.18

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2010

 

2,652,755

 

$

13.12

 

6.60

 

Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2013

 

4,904,613

 

$

10.99

 

4.66

 

Exercisable at December 31, 2013

 

4,462,447

 

$

10.87

 

4.31

 

 

At December 31, 2010,2013, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding, of options that vested or expected to vest and of options that were exercisable was approximately $9.3$28.5 million.  The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $0.2$4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

F-25



Table of Contents2013.

 

Restricted Shares

 

The Company applies the fair value method of accounting for contingently issued shares.  As such, each grant is recognized ratably over the related vesting period.  Approximately 387,000219,000 restricted shares and share units were issued during 20102013 for which the fair value of the restricted shares and share units at their respective grant dates was approximately $2.8$3.4 million, which vest over three andto five years.  During 2009,2012, approximately 402,000595,000 restricted shares and share units were issued for which the fair value of the restricted shares and share units at their respective grant dates was approximately $1.5$6.9 million.  As of December 31, 20102013 the Company had approximately $2.2$3.2 million of remaining unrecognized restricted share and share unit compensation costs that will be recognized over the next four years.

The fair value for restricted shares granted in 2008 was estimated at the time the units were granted.  Awards that contain a market feature were  Restricted share awards are considered to be performance awards and are valued using a Monte Carlo-pricing model applying the following weighted average assumptions:

Assumptions:

 

2008

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

2.1

%

Volatility of total annual return

 

28.5

%

Weighted average expected life of the units

 

3 years

 

Weighted average grant date fair value of units granted

 

$

4.14

 

The Monte Carlo pricing model was not used to value the 2010 and 2009 restricted shares granted as no market conditions were present in these awards, as the fair value of the restricted share grants were equal to the stock price on the date of grant.grant date.  The compensation expense recognized related to these awards and remaining unrecognized compensation costs are included in the amounts disclosed above.

 

In 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008,2011, the Company recognized compensation expense related to restricted shares and share units issued to employees and Trustees of approximately $1.8$5.4 million, $1.6$3.9 million, and $1.3$2.2 million, respectively; these amounts were recorded in general and administrative expense. The following table presents non-vested restricted share and share unit activity during 2010:2013:

 

 

 

Number of Non-

 

 

 

Vested Restricted

 

 

 

Shares and Share Units

 

Non-Vested at January 1, 20102013

 

572,320853,140

 

Granted

 

386,785219,338

 

Vested

 

(235,698350,328

)

Forfeited

 

(51,58510,519

)

Non-Vested at December 31, 20102013

 

671,822711,631

 

 

F-26F-40



Table of Contents

 

On January 25, 2013, 41,503 restricted share units were granted to certain executives.  The restricted share units were granted in the form of deferred share units with a market condition, entitling the holders thereof to receive common shares at a future date.  The deferred share units will be awarded based on the Company’s total return to shareholders with respect to a specified peer group consisting of publicly traded REITs over a three-year period.  The fair value of the restricted share units on the grant date was approximately $0.8 million.  The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the fair value of the awards.  The restricted share units will cliff vest upon the third anniversary of the effective date, or December 31, 2015.  The compensation expense recognized related to these awards and remaining unrecognized compensation costs are included in the amounts disclosed above.

On January 25, 2012, 49,981 restricted share units were granted to certain executives.  The restricted share units were granted in the form of deferred share units with a market condition, entitling the holders thereof to receive common shares at a future date.  The deferred share units will be awarded based on the Company’s total return to shareholders with respect to a specified peer group consisting of publicly traded REITs over a three-year period.  The fair value of the restricted share units on the grant date was approximately $0.8 million.  The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the fair value of the awards.  The restricted share units will cliff vest upon the third anniversary of the effective date, or December 31, 2014.  The compensation expense recognized related to these awards and remaining unrecognized compensation costs are included in the amounts disclosed above.

On May 30, 2012, 274,668 restricted share units were granted to our former chief executive officer.  The restricted share units were granted in the form of deferred share units with a market condition, entitling the holder thereof to receive common shares at a future date.  The deferred share units will be awarded based on the price return of the Company’s share price over a two-year period.  The fair value of the restricted share units on the grant date was approximately $3.0 million.  The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the fair value of the award.  The restricted share units cliff vested on December 31, 2013.  The compensation expense recognized related to these awards and remaining unrecognized compensation costs are included in the amounts disclosed above.

15.16.  EARNINGS PER SHARE AND UNIT AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND CAPITAL

Earnings (loss) per common share and shareholders’ equity

 

The following is a summary of the elements used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

 

$

(9,851

)

$

(19,302

)

$

(25,837

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

10,409

 

$

(13,276

)

$

(13,400

)

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

557

 

1,046

 

2,034

 

 

(51

)

513

 

694

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

(1,755

)

(665

)

 

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

Loss from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

(11,049

)

$

(18,921

)

$

(23,803

)

Distribution to preferred shares (1)

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

 

3,832

 

18,970

 

28,939

 

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

Noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership

 

(176

)

(986

)

(2,344

)

 

(537

)

(406

)

(729

)

Total discontinued operations attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

3,656

 

$

17,984

 

$

26,595

 

 

$

31,048

 

$

16,498

 

$

15,118

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

$

(7,393

)

$

(937

)

$

2,792

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company’s common shareholders

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average shares outstanding

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

Share options and restricted share units (1)

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding (2)

 

93,998

 

70,988

 

57,621

 

Share options and restricted share units (2)

 

2,551

 

 

 

Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding (3)

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per Common Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

$

(0.41

)

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Discontinued operations

 

0.04

 

0.26

 

0.46

 

 

0.23

 

0.14

 

0.14

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

$

(0.08

)

$

(0.01

)

$

0.05

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

F-41



Table of Contents

Earnings (loss) per common unit and capital

The following is a summary of the elements used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Dollars and units in thousands, except per unit amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

10,409

 

$

(13,276

)

$

(13,400

)

Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

(51

)

513

 

694

 

Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 

42

 

(1,918

)

(2,810

)

Distribution to preferred unitholders (1)

 

(6,008

)

(6,008

)

(1,218

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

4,392

 

$

(20,689

)

$

(16,734

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total discontinued operations

 

31,585

 

16,904

 

15,847

 

Operating Partnership interests of third parties

 

(537

)

(406

)

(729

)

Total discontinued operations attributable to common unitholders

 

$

31,048

 

$

16,498

 

$

15,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) attributable to common unitholders

 

$

35,440

 

$

(4,191

)

$

(1,616

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average units outstanding

 

135,191

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

Unit options and restricted share units (2)

 

2,551

 

 

 

Weighted-average diluted units outstanding (3)

 

137,742

 

124,548

 

102,976

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.16

)

Discontinued operations

 

0.23

 

0.14

 

0.14

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common unit

 

$

0.26

 

$

(0.03

)

$

(0.02

)

 


(1)  For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008,2011, the potentially dilutive sharesCompany declared cash dividends per preferred share/unit of approximately 1,177,000, 547,000,$1.938, $1.938 and 94,000 respectively, were not included in the earnings per share calculation as their effect is antidilutive.$0.393, respectively.

 

(2) For the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092012 and 2008,2011, the potentially dilutive shares/units of approximately 2,000,000, and 1,378,000 respectively, were not included in the earnings per share/unit calculation as their effect is antidilutive.

(3) For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company declared cash dividends per sharecommon share/unit of $0.145, $0.10$0.460, $0.350 and $0.565,$0.290, respectively.

 

The Operating Partnership units and common sharesunits have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in the total net income or loss and distributions of the Operating Partnership.  An Operating Partnership unit may be redeemed for cash, or at the Company’s option, common sharesunits on a one-for-one basis.  Outstanding noncontrolling interest units in the Operating Partnership were 4,737,136, 4,809,6362,275,730, 3,293,730 and 5,079,9284,674,136 as of December 31, 2010, 20092013, 2012 and 2008,2011, respectively.  There were 98,596,796139,328,366 and 131,794,547 common sharesunits outstanding as of December 31, 2010.2013 and 2012, respectively.

Issuance of Common and Preferred Shares

 

On August 19,Pursuant to our previous sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (the “Previous Sales Agent”), dated April 3, 2009, as amended on January 26, 2011 and September 16, 2011 (as amended, the “Previous Sales Agreement”), the Company sold 32.2had a program to enable it to sell up to 20 million common shares in “at the market” offerings.  On May 7, 2013, the Company terminated the Previous Sales Agreement with the Previous Sales Agent and entered into separate Equity Distribution Agreements (the “Equity Distribution Agreements”) with each of Wells Fargo Securities LLC; BMO Capital Markets Corp.; Jefferies LLC; Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated; and RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, the “Sales Agents”).   Pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreements, the Company may sell, from time to time, up to 12 million common shares of beneficial interest for net proceeds of approximately $161.9 million.  In April 2009,through the Company commenced the sale of up to 10 million common shares pursuant to a continuous offering program, which was amended in January 2011 to include the sale of up to 15 million common shares.  Pursuant to the program, we may sell shares in amounts and at times to be determined by us.  Actual sales will be determined by a variety of factors to be determined by us, including market conditions, the trading price of our common shares and determinations by us of the appropriate sources of funding.  In connection with the offering program, the Company engaged a sales agent who receives compensation equal to up to three percent of the gross sales price per common share for any shares sold pursuant to the program.  During the year ended December 31, 2010 we sold 5.6 million shares under the program at an average sales price of $8.62 per share resulting in net proceeds of $47.6 million ($57.6 million of net proceeds and 8.1 million shares sold with an average sales price of $7.28 since program inception in 2009).  The Company used the net proceeds to fund the acquisition of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.Sales Agents.

 

F-27F-42



Table of Contents

 

During 2013, the Company sold a total of 5.7 million common shares under the agreements at an average sales price of $17.92 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $102.1 million under the program.  The Company incurred $1.8 million of offering costs in conjunction with the 2013 sales.  The proceeds from the sales conducted during the year ended December 31, 2013 were used to fund acquisitions of storage facilities and for general corporate purposes.  As of December 31, 2013, 6.4 million common shares remained available for issuance under the Equity Distribution Agreements.

16.17.  INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are established for temporary differences between financial reporting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse.  A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if the Company believes that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  No valuation allowance was recorded at December 31, 20102013 or 2009.2012.  The Company had net deferred tax assets of $0.3 million and $0.5$0.7 million, which are included in other assets, as of December 31, 20102013 and 2009, respectively.2012.  The Company believes it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized.

 

The following table discloses the income tax rates for the periods identified below:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statutory federal income tax rate

 

34

%

34

%

34

%

 

34

%

34

%

State and local income taxes

 

4

%

4

%

4

%

 

4

%

4

%

Effective income tax rate

 

38

%

38

%

38

%

 

38

%

38

%

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share based compensation

 

$

2,971

 

$

2,689

 

$

2,177

 

$

1,933

 

$

1,325

 

$

1,185

 

Other

 

34

 

 

258

 

 

324

 

 

Deferred taxes

 

$

3,005

 

$

2,689

 

$

2,435

 

$

1,933

 

$

1,649

 

$

1,185

 

The following table discloses the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, which are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets:

 

 

As of December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share based compensation

 

$

2,379

 

$

2,175

 

$

3,684

 

$

3,347

 

Other

 

461

 

 

400

 

 

Deferred taxes

 

$

2,840

 

$

2,175

 

$

4,084

 

$

3,347

 

18.  DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, discontinued operations relates to 35 facilities that the Company sold during 2013, 26 facilities that the Company sold during 2012, and 19 facilities that the Company sold during 2011.  Each of the sales during 2013, 2012 and 2011 resulted in the recognition of a gain, which totaled $27.4 million, $9.8 million, and $3.9 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the revenue and expense information for the period the Company owned the facilities classified as discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

F-43



Table of Contents

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

10,795

 

$

21,077

 

$

27,958

 

Other property related income

 

1,583

 

2,703

 

5,138

 

Total revenues

 

12,378

 

23,780

 

33,096

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property operating expenses

 

5,318

 

10,742

 

13,630

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

2,703

 

5,548

 

7,110

 

Total operating expenses

 

8,021

 

16,290

 

20,740

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

4,357

 

7,490

 

12,356

 

OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense on loans

 

(212

)

(397

)

(412

)

Gain from disposition of discontinued operations

 

27,440

 

9,811

 

3,903

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

31,585

 

$

16,904

 

$

15,847

 

 

17.19.  PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

 

During 2010, the Company completed an acquisition accounted for as a business combination of 85 management contracts from United Stor-All.  Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2010,2013, the Company acquired 1220 self-storage facilities for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $85.1 million.  There were no acquisitions during 2009$189.8 million (see note 4)3).

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information set forth below reflects adjustments to the Company’s historical financial data to give effect to each of the acquisitions and related financing activity (including the issuance of common shares) that occurred subsequent to January 1, 2009during 2013 and 2012 as if each had occurred as of January 1, 2009.2012 and 2011, respectively.  The unaudited pro forma information presented below does not purport to represent what the Company’s actual results of operations would have been for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to represent the Company’s future results of operations.

 

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, ourthe Company’s consolidated results of operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 based on the assumptions described above:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma revenue

 

$

328,501

 

$

306,006

 

Pro forma income from continuing operations

 

40,616

 

15,784

 

Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted — as reported

 

$

0.03

 

$

(0.17

)

Basic and diluted — as pro forma

 

0.25

 

0.06

 

F-28F-44



Table of Contents

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pro forma revenue

 

$

224,586

 

$

222,953

 

Pro forma loss from continuing operations

 

(10,880

)

(21,296

)

Loss per common share from continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted — as reported

 

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.27

)

Basic and diluted — as pro forma

 

(0.12

)

(0.28

)

18.20.  SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

The following is a summary of quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 20102013 and 20092012 (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

2010

 

2010

 

2010

 

2010

 

 

2013

 

2013

 

2013

 

2013

 

Total revenues

 

$

51,564

 

$

53,163

 

$

55,487

 

$

56,612

 

 

$

74,655

 

$

78,289

 

$

82,487

 

$

82,964

 

Total operating expenses

 

44,165

 

46,529

 

45,683

 

45,670

 

 

65,756

 

64,377

 

65,785

 

64,180

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

(3,475

)

(4,521

)

(1,480

)

2,083

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

(0.04

)

(0.05

)

(0.02

)

0.02

 

Net (loss) income attributable to the Company

 

(392

)

2,550

 

16,342

 

22,948

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

(0.01

)

0.01

 

0.11

 

0.15

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

March 31,

 

June 30,

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

2012

 

2012

 

2012

 

2012

 

 

2009

 

2009

 

2009

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues

 

$

53,263

 

$

52,625

 

$

53,082

 

$

51,762

 

 

$

60,548

 

$

63,649

 

$

69,050

 

$

73,075

 

Total operating expenses

 

45,906

 

47,135

 

45,467

 

44,566

 

 

54,754

 

57,644

 

62,492

 

64,559

 

Net income (loss) attributable to the Company

 

(2,109

)

(2,844

)

6,818

 

(2,802

)

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share

 

(0.03

)

(0.05

)

0.09

 

(0.03

)

Net (loss) income attributable to the Company

 

(3,843

)

2,543

 

1,636

 

1,481

 

Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share

 

(0.04

)

0.01

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

 

The summationsum of quarterly earnings per share amounts do not necessarily equal the full year amounts.  The above information was updated to reclassify amounts to discontinued operations (see note 10)18).

 

19. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)21. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(6,019

)

$

(332

)

$

3,102

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments

 

 

6,153

 

(4,608

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency translation

 

(268

)

553

 

(1,281

)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(6,287

)

$

6,374

 

$

(2,787

)

Subsequent to December 31, 2013, the Company acquired one facility in California, one facility in Connecticut, three facilities in Florida and two facilities in Maryland for an aggregate purchase price of $73.0 million, net of $26.0 million of assumed debt associated with two facilities in Florida and two facilities in Maryland.

 

F-29F-45



Table of Contents

 

U-STORE-IT
CUBESMART

SCHEDULE III

REAL ESTATE AND RELATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER

December 31, 2010
2013

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount at
December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building
and
Improvements

 

Costs
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Subsequent
to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(D)

 

Year
Acquired/
Developed

 

Mobile, AL

 

128,999

 

 

(A)

226

 

2,524

 

1,373

 

301

 

3,429

 

3,730

 

1,287

 

1997

 

Chandler, AZ

 

47,520

 

 

 

327

 

1,257

 

268

 

327

 

1,325

 

1,652

 

267

 

2005

 

Chandler I, AZ

 

47,520

 

 

 

327

 

1,257

 

266

 

327

 

1,368

 

1,695

 

389

 

2005

 

Chandler II, AZ

 

83,859

 

 

 

1,518

 

7,485

 

6

 

1,518

 

7,491

 

9,009

 

414

 

2013

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

57,430

 

 

 

951

 

4,688

 

8

 

951

 

4,696

 

5,647

 

1,267

 

2013

 

Glendale, AZ

 

56,850

 

 

(O)

201

 

2,265

 

956

 

418

 

2,957

 

3,375

 

999

 

1998

 

 

56,807

 

 

 

201

 

2,265

 

1,006

 

418

 

2,721

 

3,139

 

1,228

 

1998

 

Green Valley, AZ

 

25,100

 

 

 

298

 

1,153

 

165

 

298

 

1,147

 

1,445

 

226

 

2005

 

 

25,200

 

 

 

298

 

1,153

 

129

 

298

 

1,072

 

1,370

 

288

 

2005

 

Mesa I, AZ

 

52,375

 

 

 

920

 

2,739

 

151

 

921

 

2,886

 

3,807

 

853

 

2006

 

 

52,375

 

 

 

920

 

2,739

 

173

 

921

 

2,466

 

3,387

 

668

 

2006

 

Mesa II, AZ

 

45,445

 

 

 

731

 

2,176

 

175

 

731

 

2,347

 

3,078

 

716

 

2006

 

 

45,461

 

 

 

731

 

2,176

 

181

 

731

 

2,042

 

2,773

 

544

 

2006

 

Mesa III, AZ

 

58,264

 

 

 

706

 

2,101

 

168

 

706

 

2,265

 

2,971

 

687

 

2006

 

 

58,264

 

 

 

706

 

2,101

 

168

 

706

 

1,885

 

2,591

 

521

 

2006

 

Phoenix I, AZ

 

100,762

 

 

(O)

1,134

 

3,376

 

324

 

1,135

 

3,696

 

4,831

 

1,099

 

2006

 

 

100,775

 

 

 

1,134

 

3,376

 

316

 

1,135

 

3,043

 

4,178

 

842

 

2006

 

Phoenix II, AZ

 

45,270

 

 

(O)

756

 

2,251

 

282

 

756

 

2,530

 

3,286

 

728

 

2006

 

 

83,415

 

 

 

756

 

2,251

 

1,498

 

847

 

3,053

 

3,900

 

679

 

2006/2011

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

80,425

 

 

(O)

443

 

4,879

 

1,709

 

883

 

6,069

 

6,952

 

2,031

 

1998

 

 

79,825

 

 

 

443

 

4,879

 

1,691

 

883

 

5,472

 

6,355

 

2,457

 

1998

 

Tempe, AZ

 

53,890

 

 

(A)

749

 

2,159

 

204

 

749

 

2,095

 

2,844

 

379

 

2005

 

Tempe I, AZ

 

53,890

 

 

 

749

 

2,159

 

194

 

749

 

2,049

 

2,798

 

530

 

2005

 

Tempe II, AZ

 

35,125

 

 

 

588

 

2,898

 

12

 

588

 

2,910

 

3,498

 

495

 

2013

 

Tucson I, AZ

 

59,350

 

 

(O)

188

 

2,078

 

936

 

384

 

2,789

 

3,173

 

930

 

1998

 

 

59,500

 

 

 

188

 

2,078

 

950

 

384

 

2,574

 

2,958

 

1,149

 

1998

 

Tucson II, AZ

 

43,950

 

2,919

 

188

 

2,078

 

924

 

391

 

2,767

 

3,158

 

914

 

1998

 

 

43,850

 

 

 

188

 

2,078

 

1,019

 

391

 

2,621

 

3,012

 

1,102

 

1998

 

Tucson III, AZ

 

49,822

 

 

(B)

532

 

2,048

 

160

 

533

 

1,909

 

2,442

 

347

 

2005

 

 

49,832

 

 

(A)

532

 

2,048

 

225

 

533

 

1,912

 

2,445

 

504

 

2005

 

Tucson IV, AZ

 

48,008

 

 

(B)

674

 

2,595

 

176

 

675

 

2,396

 

3,071

 

441

 

2005

 

 

48,040

 

 

(A)

674

 

2,595

 

249

 

675

 

2,423

 

3,098

 

641

 

2005

 

Tucson V, AZ

 

45,234

 

 

(B)

515

 

1,980

 

250

 

515

 

1,942

 

2,457

 

359

 

2005

 

 

45,134

 

 

(A)

515

 

1,980

 

324

 

515

 

1,948

 

2,463

 

503

 

2005

 

Tucson VI, AZ

 

40,766

 

 

(B)

440

 

1,692

 

170

 

440

 

1,615

 

2,055

 

316

 

2005

 

 

40,814

 

 

(A)

440

 

1,692

 

193

 

430

 

1,588

 

2,018

 

425

 

2005

 

Tucson VII, AZ

 

52,688

 

 

(B)

670

 

2,576

 

224

 

670

 

2,425

 

3,095

 

448

 

2005

 

 

52,638

 

 

(A)

670

 

2,576

 

224

 

670

 

2,389

 

3,059

 

653

 

2005

 

Tucson VIII, AZ

 

46,650

 

 

(B)

589

 

2,265

 

117

 

589

 

2,053

 

2,642

 

370

 

2005

 

 

46,550

 

 

(A)

589

 

2,265

 

263

 

589

 

2,177

 

2,766

 

558

 

2005

 

Tucson IX, AZ

 

67,648

 

 

(B)

724

 

2,786

 

296

 

725

 

2,680

 

3,405

 

488

 

2005

 

 

67,545

 

 

(A)

724

 

2,786

 

346

 

725

 

2,616

 

3,341

 

708

 

2005

 

Tucson X, AZ

 

46,350

 

 

(B)

424

 

1,633

 

217

 

425

 

1,609

 

2,034

 

302

 

2005

 

 

46,250

 

 

(A)

424

 

1,633

 

198

 

425

 

1,522

 

1,947

 

411

 

2005

 

Tucson XI, AZ

 

42,800

 

 

(B)

439

 

1,689

 

308

 

439

 

1,750

 

2,189

 

317

 

2005

 

 

42,700

 

 

(A)

439

 

1,689

 

382

 

439

 

1,782

 

2,221

 

490

 

2005

 

Tucson XII, AZ

 

42,325

 

 

(B)

671

 

2,582

 

189

 

672

 

2,397

 

3,069

 

432

 

2005

 

 

42,225

 

 

(A)

671

 

2,582

 

280

 

672

 

2,449

 

3,121

 

632

 

2005

 

Tucson XIII, AZ

 

45,792

 

 

(B)

587

 

2,258

 

162

 

587

 

2,092

 

2,679

 

382

 

2005

 

 

45,800

 

 

(A)

587

 

2,258

 

252

 

587

 

2,148

 

2,735

 

564

 

2005

 

Tucson XIV, AZ

 

49,095

 

 

(O)

707

 

2,721

 

227

 

708

 

2,553

 

3,261

 

468

 

2005

 

 

49,095

 

 

 

707

 

2,721

 

452

 

708

 

2,639

 

3,347

 

683

 

2005

 

Apple Valley I, CA

 

73,440

 

 

 

140

 

1,570

 

1,571

 

476

 

2,775

 

3,251

 

910

 

1997

 

Apple Valley II, CA

 

61,555

 

 

(C)

160

 

1,787

 

1,196

 

431

 

2,681

 

3,112

 

914

 

1997

 

Benicia, CA

 

74,770

 

 

(O)

2,392

 

7,028

 

173

 

2,392

 

6,205

 

8,597

 

1,092

 

2005

 

 

74,770

 

 

 

2,392

 

7,028

 

133

 

2,392

 

6,088

 

8,480

 

1,590

 

2005

 

Cathedral City, CA

 

109,340

 

 

(O)

2,194

 

10,046

 

223

 

2,195

 

9,283

 

11,478

 

2,658

 

2006

 

Citrus Heights, CA

 

75,620

 

 

(B)

1,633

 

4,793

 

208

 

1,634

 

4,319

 

5,953

 

820

 

2005

 

 

75,620

 

 

(A)

1,633

 

4,793

 

210

 

1,634

 

4,262

 

5,896

 

1,150

 

2005

 

Diamond Bar, CA

 

103,034

 

 

(O)

2,522

 

7,404

 

240

 

2,524

 

6,594

 

9,118

 

1,235

 

2005

 

 

102,984

 

 

 

2,522

 

7,404

 

159

 

2,524

 

6,471

 

8,995

 

1,766

 

2005

 

Escondido, CA

 

142,870

 

 

(M)

3,040

 

11,804

 

38

 

3,040

 

11,058

 

14,098

 

1,999

 

2007

 

 

142,645

 

 

 

3,040

 

11,804

 

147

 

3,040

 

9,597

 

12,637

 

1,915

 

2007

 

Fallbrook, CA

 

46,620

 

 

 

133

��

1,492

 

1,492

 

432

 

2,663

 

3,095

 

863

 

1997

 

 

46,420

 

 

 

133

 

1,492

 

1,733

 

432

 

2,726

 

3,158

 

1,061

 

1997

 

Lancaster, CA

 

60,625

 

 

(C)

390

 

2,247

 

953

 

556

 

2,769

 

3,325

 

756

 

2001

 

 

60,675

 

 

 

390

 

2,247

 

953

 

556

 

2,700

 

3,256

 

929

 

2001

 

Long Beach, CA

 

125,163

 

 

(O)

3,138

 

14,368

 

480

 

3,138

 

14,844

 

17,982

 

3,892

 

2006

 

 

125,121

 

 

 

3,138

 

14,368

 

406

 

3,138

 

12,863

 

16,001

 

3,245

 

2006

 

Murrieta, CA

 

49,815

 

 

(M)

1,883

 

5,532

 

199

 

1,903

 

4,926

 

6,829

 

883

 

2005

 

 

49,855

 

 

 

1,883

 

5,532

 

131

 

1,903

 

4,798

 

6,701

 

1,255

 

2005

 

North Highlands, CA

 

57,244

 

 

(B)

868

 

2,546

 

262

 

868

 

2,442

 

3,310

 

473

 

2005

 

 

57,094

 

 

(A)

868

 

2,546

 

336

 

868

 

2,437

 

3,305

 

656

 

2005

 

Orangevale, CA

 

50,392

 

 

(B)

1,423

 

4,175

 

280

 

1,423

 

3,860

 

5,283

 

707

 

2005

 

 

50,392

 

 

(A)

1,423

 

4,175

 

255

 

1,423

 

3,769

 

5,192

 

1,022

 

2005

 

Palm Springs I, CA

 

72,675

 

 

(O)

1,565

 

7,164

 

130

 

1,566

 

7,290

 

8,856

 

1,940

 

2006

 

Palm Springs II, CA

 

122,370

 

 

(O)

2,131

 

9,758

 

375

 

2,132

 

10,124

 

12,256

 

2,685

 

2006

 

Pleasanton, CA

 

85,055

 

 

 

2,799

 

8,222

 

60

 

2,799

 

7,117

 

9,916

 

1,236

 

2005

 

 

85,045

 

 

 

2,799

 

8,222

 

51

 

2,799

 

7,030

 

9,829

 

1,838

 

2005

 

Rancho Cordova, CA

 

54,128

 

 

(B)

1,094

 

3,212

 

239

 

1,095

 

2,992

 

4,087

 

581

 

2005

 

 

53,978

 

 

(A)

1,094

 

3,212

 

231

 

1,095

 

2,935

 

4,030

 

796

 

2005

 

Rialto I, CA

 

57,411

 

 

(M)

899

 

4,118

 

173

 

899

 

4,287

 

5,186

 

1,135

 

2006

 

 

57,391

 

 

 

899

 

4,118

 

174

 

899

 

3,722

 

4,621

 

941

 

2006

 

Rialto II, CA

 

99,783

 

 

 

277

 

3,098

 

1,745

 

672

 

4,390

 

5,062

 

1,556

 

1997

 

 

99,783

 

 

 

277

 

3,098

 

1,703

 

672

 

4,025

 

4,697

 

1,783

 

1997

 

Riverside I, CA

 

67,170

 

 

(M)

1,351

 

6,183

 

236

 

1,351

 

6,415

 

7,766

 

1,695

 

2006

 

 

67,120

 

 

 

1,351

 

6,183

 

390

 

1,351

 

5,741

 

7,092

 

1,424

 

2006

 

Riverside II, CA

 

85,196

 

 

(O)

1,170

 

5,359

 

346

 

1,170

 

5,701

 

6,871

 

1,510

 

2006

 

 

85,426

 

 

 

1,170

 

5,359

 

318

 

1,170

 

4,943

 

6,113

 

1,246

 

2006

 

Roseville, CA

 

59,869

 

 

(B)

1,284

 

3,767

 

375

 

1,284

 

3,605

 

4,889

 

673

 

2005

 

 

59,869

 

 

(A)

1,284

 

3,767

 

310

 

1,284

 

3,493

 

4,777

 

960

 

2005

 

Sacramento I, CA

 

51,114

 

 

(B)

1,152

 

3,380

 

230

 

1,152

 

3,126

 

4,278

 

600

 

2005

 

 

50,714

 

 

(A)

1,152

 

3,380

 

223

 

1,152

 

3,055

 

4,207

 

838

 

2005

 

Sacramento II, CA

 

61,856

 

 

(B)

1,406

 

4,128

 

147

 

1,407

 

3,686

 

5,093

 

690

 

2005

 

 

61,888

 

 

(A)

1,406

 

4,128

 

212

 

1,407

 

3,691

 

5,098

 

992

 

2005

 

San Bernardino I, CA

 

31,070

 

 

(A)

51

 

572

 

1,145

 

182

 

1,480

 

1,662

 

436

 

1997

 

 

31,070

 

 

 

51

 

572

 

1,148

 

182

 

1,403

 

1,585

 

526

 

1997

 

San Bernardino II, CA

 

41,546

 

 

(A)

112

 

1,251

 

1,161

 

306

 

2,042

 

2,348

 

682

 

1997

 

 

41,546

 

 

 

112

 

1,251

 

1,177

 

306

 

1,900

 

2,206

 

801

 

1997

 

San Bernardino III, CA

 

35,416

 

 

 

98

 

1,093

 

1,189

 

242

 

1,800

 

2,042

 

690

 

1997

 

San Bernardino IV, CA

 

35,671

 

 

(A)

98

 

1,093

 

969

 

242

 

1,728

 

1,970

 

580

 

1997

 

 

83,057

 

 

 

1,872

 

5,391

 

84

 

1,872

 

4,758

 

6,630

 

1,279

 

2005

 

San Bernardino V, CA

 

83,507

 

 

(C)

1,872

 

5,391

 

55

 

1,872

 

4,783

 

6,655

 

891

 

2005

 

 

57,595

 

 

 

783

 

3,583

 

440

 

783

 

3,496

 

4,279

 

892

 

2006

 

San Bernardino VI, CA

 

57,145

 

 

(M)

783

 

3,583

 

447

 

783

 

4,026

 

4,809

 

1,037

 

2006

 

San Bernardino VII, CA

 

103,860

 

 

(M)

1,205

 

5,518

 

252

 

1,205

 

5,316

 

6,521

 

1,529

 

2006

 

 

78,729

 

 

 

1,475

 

6,753

 

250

 

1,290

 

6,257

 

7,547

 

1,590

 

2006

 

San Bernardino VIII, CA

 

78,729

 

 

(M)

1,475

 

6,753

 

322

 

1,476

 

7,070

 

8,546

 

1,867

 

2006

 

 

95,604

 

 

 

1,691

 

7,741

 

393

 

1,692

 

6,192

 

7,884

 

2,465

 

2006

 

San Bernardino IX, CA

 

95,129

 

 

(O)

1,691

 

7,741

 

286

 

1,692

 

7,191

 

8,883

 

2,100

 

2006

 

San Bernardino X, CA

 

37,430

 

 

 

775

 

2,288

 

121

 

776

 

2,078

 

2,854

 

381

 

2005

 

San Marcos, CA

 

37,430

 

 

 

775

 

2,288

 

116

 

776

 

2,040

 

2,816

 

554

 

2005

 

Santa Ana, CA

 

63,571

 

 

(O)

1,223

 

5,600

 

233

 

1,223

 

5,829

 

7,052

 

1,534

 

2006

 

 

63,816

 

 

 

1,223

 

5,600

 

256

 

1,223

 

5,082

 

6,305

 

1,288

 

2006

 

South Sacramento, CA

 

51,940

 

 

(B)

790

 

2,319

 

242

 

791

 

2,227

 

3,018

 

431

 

2005

 

 

52,565

 

 

(A)

790

 

2,319

 

231

 

791

 

2,154

 

2,945

 

587

 

2005

 

Spring Valley, CA

 

55,045

 

 

(M)

1,178

 

5,394

 

517

 

1,178

 

5,907

 

7,085

 

1,502

 

2006

 

 

55,045

 

 

 

1,178

 

5,394

 

524

 

1,178

 

5,174

 

6,352

 

1,323

 

2006

 

Temecula I, CA

 

81,700

 

 

 

660

 

4,735

 

1,142

 

899

 

5,255

 

6,154

 

1,437

 

1998

 

 

81,310

 

 

 

660

 

4,735

 

1,210

 

899

 

5,388

 

6,287

 

1,219

 

1998

 

Temecula II, CA

 

84,398

 

 

(M)

3,080

 

5,839

 

147

 

3,080

 

5,876

 

8,956

 

1,066

 

2007

 

 

84,318

 

 

 

3,080

 

5,839

 

192

 

3,080

 

5,102

 

8,182

 

1,018

 

2007

 

Thousand Palms, CA

 

75,445

 

 

(O)

1,493

 

6,835

 

383

 

1,493

 

7,214

 

8,707

 

1,939

 

2006

 

Vista I, CA

 

74,405

 

 

 

711

 

4,076

 

2,081

 

1,118

 

5,247

 

6,365

 

1,294

 

2001

 

 

74,405

 

 

 

711

 

4,076

 

2,275

 

1,118

 

5,424

 

6,542

 

1,757

 

2001

 

Vista II, CA

 

147,281

 

 

(O)

4,629

 

13,599

 

198

 

4,629

 

11,877

 

16,506

 

2,056

 

2005

 

 

147,941

 

 

 

4,629

 

13,599

 

139

 

4,629

 

11,707

 

16,336

 

3,056

 

2005

 

Walnut, CA

 

50,708

 

 

(O)

1,578

 

4,635

 

184

 

1,595

 

4,143

 

5,738

 

743

 

2005

 

 

50,708

 

 

 

1,578

 

4,635

 

224

 

1,595

 

4,120

 

5,715

 

1,070

 

2005

 

West Sacramento, CA

 

40,015

 

 

(B)

1,222

 

3,590

 

148

 

1,222

 

3,189

 

4,411

 

835

 

2005

 

Westminster, CA

 

68,428

 

 

 

1,740

 

5,142

 

291

 

1,743

 

4,550

 

6,293

 

1,252

 

2005

 

Aurora, CO

 

75,867

 

 

(A)

1,343

 

2,986

 

274

 

1,343

 

2,726

 

4,069

 

715

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

47,975

 

 

 

771

 

1,717

 

329

 

771

 

1,704

 

2,475

 

434

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

62,400

 

1,733

 

657

 

2,674

 

207

 

656

 

2,394

 

3,050

 

600

 

2006

 

Denver I, CO

 

59,200

 

 

 

673

 

2,741

 

183

 

671

 

2,434

 

3,105

 

661

 

2006

 

Denver II, CO

 

74,435

 

 

 

1,430

 

7,053

 

36

 

1,430

 

7,088

 

8,518

 

283

 

2012

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

54,770

 

 

(A)

878

 

1,953

 

234

 

879

 

1,793

 

2,672

 

456

 

2005

 

Golden, CO

 

87,800

 

 

(A)

1,683

 

3,744

 

382

 

1,684

 

3,456

 

5,140

 

886

 

2005

 

Littleton, CO

 

53,490

 

 

(A)

1,268

 

2,820

 

197

 

1,268

 

2,509

 

3,777

 

634

 

2005

 

Northglenn, CO

 

52,102

 

 

(A)

862

 

1,917

 

360

 

862

 

1,863

 

2,725

 

460

 

2005

 

Bloomfield, CT

 

48,700

 

 

 

78

 

880

 

2,278

 

360

 

2,584

 

2,944

 

1,010

 

1997

 

Branford, CT

 

50,679

 

 

 

217

 

2,433

 

1,271

 

504

 

3,011

 

3,515

 

1,600

 

1995

 

Bristol, CT

 

47,725

 

 

 

1,819

 

3,161

 

58

 

1,819

 

2,754

 

4,573

 

825

 

2005

 

East Windsor, CT

 

46,016

 

 

 

744

 

1,294

 

447

 

744

 

1,470

 

2,214

 

433

 

2005

 

Enfield, CT

 

52,875

 

 

 

424

 

2,424

 

386

 

473

 

2,219

 

2,692

 

856

 

2001

 

Gales Ferry, CT

 

54,230

 

 

 

240

 

2,697

 

1,440

 

489

 

3,461

 

3,950

 

1,474

 

1995

 

 

F-30



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

at December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

West Sacramento, CA

 

39,715

 

 

(I)

1,222

 

3,590

 

163

 

1,222

 

3,241

 

4,463

 

563

 

2005

 

Westminster, CA

 

68,148

 

 

 

1,740

 

5,142

 

241

 

1,743

 

4,649

 

6,392

 

878

 

2005

 

Aurora, CO

 

75,827

 

 

(B)

1,343

 

2,986

 

249

 

1,343

 

2,742

 

4,085

 

497

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs I, CO

 

47,975

 

 

(O)

771

 

1,717

 

297

 

771

 

1,728

 

2,499

 

310

 

2005

 

Colorado Springs II, CO

 

62,400

 

1,877

 

657

 

2,674

 

199

 

656

 

2,870

 

3,526

 

763

 

2006

 

Denver, CO

 

59,200

 

 

(O)

673

 

2,741

 

167

 

674

 

2,903

 

3,577

 

849

 

2006

 

Federal Heights, CO

 

54,770

 

 

(B)

878

 

1,953

 

190

 

879

 

1,819

 

2,698

 

325

 

2005

 

Golden, CO

 

86,580

 

 

(B)

1,683

 

3,744

 

333

 

1,684

 

3,462

 

5,146

 

600

 

2005

 

Littleton I , CO

 

53,490

 

 

(B)

1,268

 

2,820

 

162

 

1,268

 

2,516

 

3,784

 

434

 

2005

 

Northglenn, CO

 

52,102

 

 

(B)

862

 

1,917

 

180

 

862

 

1,777

 

2,639

 

324

 

2005

 

Bloomfield, CT

 

48,700

 

 

(O)

78

 

880

 

2,208

 

360

 

2,780

 

3,140

 

903

 

1997

 

Branford, CT

 

50,679

 

 

 

217

 

2,433

 

1,203

 

504

 

2,924

 

3,428

 

930

 

1995

 

Bristol, CT

 

47,950

 

 

(C)

1,819

 

3,161

 

93

 

1,819

 

2,800

 

4,619

 

581

 

2005

 

East Windsor, CT

 

45,800

 

 

(A)

744

 

1,294

 

347

 

744

 

1,433

 

2,177

 

301

 

2005

 

Enfield, CT

 

52,875

 

 

 

424

 

2,424

 

369

 

473

 

2,232

 

2,705

 

620

 

2001

 

Gales Ferry, CT

 

54,230

 

 

(O)

240

 

2,697

 

1,409

 

489

 

3,492

 

3,981

 

1,200

 

1995

 

Manchester I, CT (6)

 

47,125

 

 

 

540

 

3,096

 

365

 

563

 

2,759

 

3,322

 

732

 

2002

 

Manchester II, CT

 

52,725

 

 

(C)

996

 

1,730

 

173

 

996

 

1,652

 

2,648

 

337

 

2005

 

Milford, CT

 

44,885

 

 

(O)

87

 

1,050

 

1,073

 

274

 

1,918

 

2,192

 

727

 

1994

 

Monroe, CT

 

58,500

 

 

(C)

2,004

 

3,483

 

573

 

2,004

 

3,545

 

5,549

 

777

 

2005

 

Mystic, CT

 

50,725

 

 

(O)

136

 

1,645

 

1,794

 

410

 

3,148

 

3,558

 

1,191

 

1994

 

Newington I, CT

 

42,520

 

 

(C)

1,059

 

1,840

 

150

 

1,059

 

1,724

 

2,783

 

348

 

2005

 

Newington II, CT

 

36,140

 

 

(C)

911

 

1,584

 

176

 

911

 

1,529

 

2,440

 

319

 

2005

 

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

86,950

 

 

(C)

3,092

 

5,374

 

368

 

3,092

 

4,977

 

8,069

 

1,040

 

2005

 

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

26,425

 

 

(C)

1,135

 

1,973

 

212

 

1,135

 

1,900

 

3,035

 

398

 

2005

 

South Windsor, CT

 

72,125

 

 

 

90

 

1,127

 

1,118

 

272

 

2,043

 

2,315

 

748

 

1994

 

Stamford, CT

 

28,957

 

 

(C)

1,941

 

3,374

 

78

 

1,941

 

2,961

 

4,902

 

610

 

2005

 

Washington, DC

 

63,085

 

 

(I)

871

 

12,759

 

306

 

894

 

12,020

 

12,914

 

1,910

 

2008

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

37,958

 

 

 

529

 

3,054

 

1,482

 

813

 

3,655

 

4,468

 

935

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

61,977

 

 

(C)

667

 

3,796

 

1,646

 

958

 

4,403

 

5,361

 

1,152

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

61,727

 

 

(A)

1,030

 

2,968

 

231

 

1,030

 

2,821

 

3,851

 

528

 

2005

 

Bradenton I, FL

 

68,391

 

 

(O)

1,180

 

3,324

 

175

 

1,180

 

3,079

 

4,259

 

604

 

2004

 

Bradenton II, FL

 

87,815

 

 

(O)

1,931

 

5,561

 

364

 

1,931

 

5,227

 

7,158

 

1,024

 

2004

 

Cape Coral, FL

 

76,567

 

 

 

472

 

2,769

 

2,447

 

830

 

4,415

 

5,245

 

1,394

 

2000

 

Dania Beach, FL (6)

 

181,463

 

 

(O)

3,584

 

10,324

 

985

 

3,584

 

9,978

 

13,562

 

1,883

 

2004

 

Dania, FL

 

58,270

 

 

(O)

205

 

2,068

 

1,389

 

481

 

3,149

 

3,630

 

1,189

 

1994

 

Davie, FL

 

81,135

 

 

 

1,268

 

7,183

 

745

 

1,373

 

6,035

 

7,408

 

1,292

 

2001

 

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

57,280

 

 

(A)

946

 

2,999

 

1,964

 

1,311

 

4,542

 

5,853

 

1,254

 

1998

 

Delray Beach, FL

 

67,821

 

 

(A)

798

 

4,539

 

635

 

883

 

4,215

 

5,098

 

1,167

 

2001

 

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

110,785

 

 

(O)

189

 

2,111

 

4,894

 

523

 

6,658

 

7,181

 

1,946

 

1996

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

70,093

 

 

 

937

 

3,646

 

2,361

 

1,384

 

5,443

 

6,827

 

1,497

 

1999

 

Ft. Myers, FL

 

67,558

 

 

(A)

303

 

3,329

 

605

 

328

 

3,463

 

3,791

 

1,129

 

1998

 

Jacksonville I, FL

 

80,376

 

 

(O)

1,862

 

5,362

 

43

 

1,862

 

4,739

 

6,601

 

757

 

2005

 

Jacksonville II, FL

 

65,070

 

 

 

950

 

7,004

 

34

 

950

 

6,371

 

7,321

 

1,157

 

2007

 

Jacksonville III, FL

 

65,575

 

 

(O)

860

 

7,409

 

834

 

1,670

 

6,861

 

8,531

 

1,242

 

2007

 

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

77,515

 

 

(O)

870

 

8,049

 

49

 

870

 

8,054

 

8,924

 

1,462

 

2007

 

Jacksonville V, FL

 

82,165

 

 

(O)

1,220

 

8,210

 

89

 

1,220

 

7,763

 

8,983

 

1,403

 

2007

 

Lake Worth, FL

 

161,808

 

 

 

183

 

6,597

 

6,755

 

183

 

11,728

 

11,911

 

3,696

 

1998

 

Lakeland, FL

 

49,095

 

 

(A)

81

 

896

 

992

 

256

 

1,384

 

1,640

 

449

 

1994

 

Kendall, FL

 

75,395

 

 

(I)

2,350

 

8,106

 

65

 

2,350

 

7,403

 

9,753

 

1,338

 

2007

 

Lutz I, FL

 

66,895

 

 

(O)

901

 

2,478

 

146

 

901

 

2,303

 

3,204

 

447

 

2004

 

Lutz II, FL

 

69,232

 

 

 

992

 

2,868

 

226

 

992

 

2,725

 

3,717

 

554

 

2004

 

Margate I, FL

 

54,505

 

 

(A)

161

 

1,763

 

1,804

 

399

 

3,278

 

3,677

 

1,192

 

1994

 

Margate II, FL

 

65,186

 

 

(O)

132

 

1,473

 

1,732

 

383

 

2,918

 

3,301

 

1,008

 

1996

 

Merrit Island, FL

 

50,417

 

 

(A)

716

 

2,983

 

492

 

796

 

2,815

 

3,611

 

653

 

2000

 

Miami I, FL

 

46,825

 

 

 

179

 

1,999

 

1,730

 

484

 

3,150

 

3,634

 

1,056

 

1995

 

Miami II, FL

 

67,060

 

 

(C)

253

 

2,544

 

1,417

 

561

 

3,626

 

4,187

 

1,410

 

1994

 

Miami IV, FL

 

150,590

 

 

(O)

4,577

 

13,185

 

469

 

4,577

 

12,038

 

16,615

 

1,991

 

2005

 

Naples I, FL

 

48,150

 

1,095

 

90

 

1,010

 

2,422

 

270

 

3,105

 

3,375

 

988

 

1996

 

Naples II, FL

 

65,850

 

 

(C)

148

 

1,652

 

4,231

 

558

 

5,446

 

6,004

 

1,763

 

1997

 

Naples III, FL

 

80,627

 

 

(A)

139

 

1,561

 

3,947

 

598

 

4,563

 

5,161

 

1,607

 

1997

 

Naples IV, FL

 

40,475

 

 

(O)

262

 

2,980

 

532

 

407

 

3,332

 

3,739

 

1,212

 

1998

 

Ocoee, FL

 

76,130

 

3,184

 

1,286

 

3,705

 

107

 

1,286

 

3,344

 

4,630

 

601

 

2005

 

Orange City, FL

 

59,586

 

 

(O)

1,191

 

3,209

 

95

 

1,191

 

2,896

 

4,087

 

556

 

2004

 

Orlando I, FL (6)

 

52,170

 

 

(O)

187

 

2,088

 

558

 

240

 

2,554

 

2,794

 

1,140

 

1997

 

Orlando II, FL

 

63,084

 

 

(C)

1,589

 

4,576

 

87

 

1,589

 

4,099

 

5,688

 

737

 

2005

 

Orlando III, FL

 

104,140

 

 

(O)

1,209

 

7,768

 

257

 

1,209

 

8,021

 

9,230

 

2,056

 

2006

 

Orlando IV, FL

 

76,615

 

 

 

633

 

3,587

 

32

 

633

 

3,619

 

4,252

 

17

 

2010

 

Oviedo, FL

 

49,251

 

 

(O)

440

 

2,824

 

407

 

440

 

3,227

 

3,667

 

841

 

2006

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

67,321

 

 

 

337

 

3,772

 

2,658

 

953

 

5,774

 

6,727

 

1,945

 

1997

 

Royal Palm Beach I, FL

 

98,961

 

 

 

205

 

2,148

 

2,692

 

741

 

4,238

 

4,979

 

1,702

 

1994

 

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

81,415

 

 

(O)

1,640

 

8,607

 

69

 

1,640

 

8,163

 

9,803

 

1,473

 

2007

 

F-31



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Costs
Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Sanford, FL

 

61,810

 

 

(O)

453

 

2,911

 

129

 

453

 

3,036

 

3,489

 

798

 

2006

 

Sarasota, FL

 

71,102

 

 

(A)

333

 

3,656

 

1,203

 

529

 

4,166

 

4,695

 

1,319

 

1998

 

St. Augustine, FL

 

59,725

 

 

(O)

135

 

1,515

 

3,224

 

383

 

4,462

 

4,845

 

1,512

 

1996

 

Stuart, FL

 

86,883

 

 

(C)

324

 

3,625

 

2,762

 

685

 

5,974

 

6,659

 

1,997

 

1997

 

SW Ranches, FL

 

64,955

 

3,931

 

1,390

 

7,598

 

41

 

1,390

 

6,748

 

8,138

 

1,222

 

2007

 

Tampa, FL

 

83,738

 

 

 

2,670

 

6,249

 

102

 

2,670

 

5,816

 

8,486

 

1,071

 

2007

 

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

68,063

 

 

(O)

719

 

3,420

 

1,535

 

835

 

4,038

 

4,873

 

1,097

 

2001

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

94,503

 

 

 

2,129

 

8,671

 

254

 

2,129

 

7,435

 

9,564

 

1,459

 

2004

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

90,485

 

 

 

806

 

4,720

 

927

 

967

 

4,132

 

5,099

 

1,005

 

2001

 

Austell , GA

 

83,625

 

2,210

 

1,635

 

4,711

 

161

 

1,643

 

4,860

 

6,503

 

1,123

 

2006

 

Decatur, GA

 

148,480

 

 

(O)

616

 

6,776

 

157

 

616

 

6,856

 

7,472

 

2,545

 

1998

 

Norcross, GA

 

85,410

 

 

 

514

 

2,930

 

749

 

632

 

2,992

 

3,624

 

742

 

2001

 

Peachtree City, GA

 

49,875

 

 

(O)

435

 

2,532

 

543

 

529

 

2,489

 

3,018

 

631

 

2001

 

Smyrna, GA

 

56,820

 

 

 

750

 

4,271

 

169

 

750

 

3,494

 

4,244

 

863

 

2001

 

Snellville, GA

 

80,000

 

 

(O)

1,660

 

4,781

 

152

 

1,660

 

4,929

 

6,589

 

1,032

 

2007

 

Suwanee I, GA

 

85,240

 

 

(O)

1,737

 

5,010

 

145

 

1,737

 

5,151

 

6,888

 

1,077

 

2007

 

Suwanee II, GA

 

79,640

 

 

(O)

800

 

6,942

 

 

622

 

6,626

 

7,248

 

1,199

 

2007

 

Addison, IL

 

31,325

 

 

(O)

428

 

3,531

 

226

 

428

 

3,315

 

3,743

 

636

 

2004

 

Aurora, IL

 

74,435

 

 

(O)

644

 

3,652

 

114

 

644

 

3,311

 

3,955

 

635

 

2004

 

Bartlett, IL

 

51,425

 

 

(O)

931

 

2,493

 

164

 

931

 

2,340

 

3,271

 

446

 

2004

 

Hanover, IL

 

41,178

 

 

(C)

1,126

 

2,197

 

163

 

1,126

 

2,078

 

3,204

 

400

 

2004

 

Bellwood, IL

 

86,650

 

 

(C)

1,012

 

5,768

 

644

 

1,012

 

5,189

 

6,201

 

1,352

 

2001

 

Des Plaines, IL (6)

 

74,400

 

3,430

 

1,564

 

4,327

 

281

 

1,564

 

4,058

 

5,622

 

781

 

2004

 

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

64,129

 

 

(O)

1,446

 

3,535

 

230

 

1,446

 

3,297

 

4,743

 

651

 

2004

 

Glenview, IL

 

100,115

 

 

(O)

3,740

 

10,367

 

169

 

3,740

 

9,255

 

12,995

 

1,780

 

2004

 

Gurnee, IL

 

80,300

 

 

(O)

1,521

 

5,440

 

244

 

1,521

 

5,007

 

6,528

 

986

 

2004

 

Harvey, IL

 

60,090

 

 

(O)

869

 

3,635

 

169

 

869

 

3,342

 

4,211

 

630

 

2004

 

Joliet, IL

 

73,175

 

 

(O)

547

 

4,704

 

182

 

547

 

4,292

 

4,839

 

814

 

2004

 

Kildeer, IL

 

46,275

 

 

 

2,102

 

2,187

 

15

 

1,997

 

2,027

 

4,024

 

386

 

2004

 

Lombard, IL

 

58,188

 

 

(O)

1,305

 

3,938

 

612

 

1,305

 

4,065

 

5,370

 

816

 

2004

 

Mount Prospect, IL

 

65,000

 

 

 

1,701

 

3,114

 

249

 

1,701

 

2,976

 

4,677

 

561

 

2004

 

Mundelein, IL

 

44,700

 

 

(O)

1,498

 

2,782

 

142

 

1,498

 

2,568

 

4,066

 

500

 

2004

 

North Chicago, IL

 

53,350

 

 

(O)

1,073

 

3,006

 

246

 

1,073

 

2,872

 

3,945

 

565

 

2004

 

Plainfield I, IL

 

53,800

 

 

(O)

1,770

 

1,715

 

222

 

1,770

 

1,698

 

3,468

 

333

 

2004

 

Plainfield II, IL

 

51,900

 

 

(O)

694

 

2,000

 

123

 

694

 

1,840

 

2,534

 

339

 

2005

 

Schaumburg, IL

 

31,160

 

 

(O)

538

 

645

 

135

 

538

 

671

 

1,209

 

134

 

2004

 

Streamwood, IL

 

64,305

 

 

(A)

1,447

 

1,662

 

240

 

1,447

 

1,665

 

3,112

 

333

 

2004

 

Warrensville, IL

 

48,796

 

 

(A)

1,066

 

3,072

 

152

 

1,066

 

2,829

 

3,895

 

507

 

2005

 

Waukegan, IL

 

79,500

 

 

(O)

1,198

 

4,363

 

250

 

1,198

 

4,054

 

5,252

 

777

 

2004

 

West Chicago, IL

 

48,175

 

 

(C)

1,071

 

2,249

 

196

 

1,071

 

2,159

 

3,230

 

418

 

2004

 

Westmont, IL

 

53,700

 

 

(O)

1,155

 

3,873

 

94

 

1,155

 

3,477

 

4,632

 

666

 

2004

 

Wheeling I, IL

 

54,210

 

 

(A)

857

 

3,213

 

242

 

857

 

3,043

 

3,900

 

590

 

2004

 

Wheeling II, IL

 

67,825

 

 

 

793

 

3,816

 

359

 

793

 

3,698

 

4,491

 

700

 

2004

 

Woodridge, IL

 

50,262

 

2,322

 

943

 

3,397

 

184

 

943

 

3,149

 

4,092

 

604

 

2004

 

Indianapolis I, IN

 

43,600

 

 

(O)

1,871

 

1,230

 

5

 

1,726

 

1,206

 

2,932

 

242

 

2004

 

Indianapolis II, IN

 

44,900

 

 

(O)

669

 

2,434

 

137

 

669

 

2,228

 

2,897

 

428

 

2004

 

Indianapolis III, IN

 

60,850

 

 

(O)

1,229

 

2,834

 

125

 

1,229

 

2,606

 

3,835

 

505

 

2004

 

Indianapolis IV, IN

 

62,105

 

 

(O)

641

 

3,154

 

29

 

552

 

2,864

 

3,416

 

558

 

2004

 

Indianapolis V, IN

 

74,825

 

 

(O)

2,138

 

3,633

 

175

 

2,138

 

3,351

 

5,489

 

652

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VI, IN

 

73,003

 

 

(A)

406

 

3,496

 

211

 

406

 

3,260

 

3,666

 

626

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VII, IN

 

91,777

 

 

(O)

908

 

4,755

 

500

 

908

 

4,653

 

5,561

 

907

 

2004

 

Indianapolis VIII, IN

 

79,998

 

 

(O)

887

 

3,548

 

215

 

887

 

3,306

 

4,193

 

633

 

2004

 

Indianapolis IX, IN

 

61,732

 

 

(O)

1,133

 

4,103

 

168

 

1,133

 

3,748

 

4,881

 

722

 

2004

 

Baton Rouge I, LA

 

35,200

 

 

(O)

112

 

1,248

 

538

 

139

 

1,569

 

1,708

 

466

 

1997

 

Baton Rouge II, LA

 

80,277

 

 

(A)

118

 

1,181

 

1,827

 

331

 

2,606

 

2,937

 

927

 

1997

 

Slidell, LA

 

79,540

 

 

 

188

 

3,175

 

1,639

 

795

 

3,591

 

4,386

 

860

 

2001

 

Boston I, MA

 

33,993

 

 

 

538

 

3,048

 

34

 

538

 

3,083

 

3,621

 

31

 

2010

 

Boston II, MA

 

60,695

 

 

 

1,516

 

8,628

 

312

 

1,516

 

7,144

 

8,660

 

1,754

 

2002

 

Leominster, MA

 

53,823

 

 

 

90

 

1,519

 

2,416

 

338

 

3,539

 

3,877

 

1,092

 

1998

 

Medford, MA

 

58,815

 

3,176

 

1,330

 

7,165

 

66

 

1,330

 

6,664

 

7,994

 

1,205

 

2007

 

Baltimore, MD

 

93,350

 

 

(C)

1,050

 

5,997

 

993

 

1,173

 

5,666

 

6,839

 

1,558

 

2001

 

California, MD

 

77,865

 

 

(O)

1,486

 

4,280

 

123

 

1,486

 

3,870

 

5,356

 

743

 

2004

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

87,045

 

 

 

3,124

 

9,000

 

367

 

3,124

 

8,258

 

11,382

 

1,514

 

2005

 

Laurel, MD

 

162,792

 

 

 

1,409

 

8,035

 

3,476

 

1,928

 

9,545

 

11,473

 

2,400

 

2001

 

Temple Hills, MD

 

97,200

 

 

 

1,541

 

8,788

 

2,194

 

1,800

 

9,236

 

11,036

 

2,335

 

2001

 

Grand Rapids, MI

 

87,381

 

 

(A)

185

 

1,821

 

1,466

 

325

 

2,848

 

3,173

 

1,049

 

1996

 

Portage, MI (6)

 

50,280

 

 

(O)

104

 

1,160

 

844

 

237

 

1,688

 

1,925

 

603

 

1996

 

Romulus, MI

 

42,050

 

 

(A)

308

 

1,743

 

658

 

418

 

1,927

 

2,345

 

445

 

1997

 

Wyoming, MI

 

91,158

 

 

(A)

191

 

2,135

 

1,140

 

354

 

2,791

 

3,145

 

1,042

 

1996

 

Gulfport, MS

 

61,251

 

 

(C)

172

 

1,928

 

1,006

 

338

 

2,719

 

3,057

 

976

 

1997

 

Belmont, NC

 

81,448

 

 

(O)

385

 

2,196

 

663

 

451

 

2,293

 

2,744

 

609

 

2001

 

Burlington I, NC

 

109,346

 

 

(A)

498

 

2,837

 

460

 

498

 

2,732

 

3,230

 

741

 

2001

 

Burlington II, NC

 

42,205

 

 

(O)

320

 

1,829

 

307

 

340

 

1,748

 

2,088

 

458

 

2001

 

Cary, NC

 

112,324

 

 

(A)

543

 

3,097

 

441

 

543

 

3,317

 

3,860

 

977

 

2001

 

Charlotte, NC

 

69,000

 

 

 

782

 

4,429

 

1,391

 

1,068

 

4,704

 

5,772

 

1,064

 

1999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-32



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Subsequent

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Raleigh, NC

 

48,675

 

 

(O)

209

 

2,398

 

229

 

296

 

2,498

 

2,794

 

901

 

1998

 

Brick, NJ

 

51,725

 

 

(O)

234

 

2,762

 

1,332

 

485

 

3,818

 

4,303

 

1,517

 

1994

 

Cherry Hill, NJ

 

52,600

 

 

 

222

 

1,260

 

3

 

222

 

1,263

 

1,485

 

14

 

2010

 

Clifton, NJ

 

105,550

 

 

(A)

4,346

 

12,520

 

171

 

4,346

 

11,154

 

15,500

 

1,905

 

2005

 

Cranford, NJ

 

91,250

 

 

(G)

290

 

3,493

 

2,182

 

779

 

5,159

 

5,938

 

1,936

 

1994

 

East Hanover, NJ

 

107,579

 

 

 

504

 

5,763

 

3,903

 

1,315

 

8,831

 

10,146

 

3,326

 

1994

 

Egg Harbor, NJ

 

39,425

 

 

 

104

 

592

 

1

 

104

 

592

 

696

 

6

 

2010

 

Egg Harbor, NJ

 

71,175

 

 

 

284

 

1,608

 

1

 

284

 

1,609

 

1,893

 

16

 

2010

 

Elizabeth, NJ

 

38,830

 

 

 

751

 

2,164

 

277

 

751

 

2,169

 

2,920

 

406

 

2005

 

Fairview, NJ

 

27,925

 

 

(G)

246

 

2,759

 

326

 

246

 

3,019

 

3,265

 

1,222

 

1997

 

Hamilton, NJ

 

70,550

 

 

(O)

1,885

 

5,430

 

258

 

1,893

 

5,676

 

7,569

 

1,306

 

2006

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

34,180

 

 

(G)

1,370

 

3,947

 

558

 

1,370

 

4,016

 

5,386

 

749

 

2005

 

Linden, NJ

 

100,325

 

 

(O)

517

 

6,008

 

1,979

 

1,043

 

7,419

 

8,462

 

2,734

 

1994

 

Morris Township, NJ (5)

 

71,776

 

 

 

500

 

5,602

 

2,564

 

1,072

 

7,558

 

8,630

 

2,787

 

1997

 

Parsippany, NJ

 

66,325

 

 

(G)

475

 

5,322

 

1,963

 

844

 

6,823

 

7,667

 

2,501

 

1997

 

Randolph, NJ

 

52,565

 

 

 

855

 

4,872

 

1,259

 

1,108

 

4,848

 

5,956

 

1,208

 

2002

 

Sewell, NJ

 

57,830

 

 

 

484

 

2,766

 

1,170

 

706

 

3,124

 

3,830

 

824

 

2001

 

Albuquerque I, NM

 

65,927

 

 

(B)

1,039

 

3,395

 

212

 

1,039

 

3,070

 

4,109

 

596

 

2005

 

Albuquerque II, NM

 

58,598

 

 

(B)

1,163

 

3,801

 

204

 

1,163

 

3,406

 

4,569

 

639

 

2005

 

Albuquerque IV, NM

 

57,536

 

 

(B)

664

 

2,171

 

226

 

664

 

2,043

 

2,707

 

391

 

2005

 

Carlsbad, NM

 

39,999

 

 

 

490

 

1,613

 

100

 

491

 

1,461

 

1,952

 

295

 

2005

 

Deming, NM

 

33,005

 

 

 

338

 

1,114

 

159

 

339

 

1,098

 

1,437

 

228

 

2005

 

Las Cruces, NM

 

65,740

 

 

 

965

 

3,268

 

214

 

969

 

3,152

 

4,121

 

581

 

2005

 

Lovington, NM

 

15,550

 

 

 

222

 

740

 

 

169

 

564

 

733

 

111

 

2005

 

Silver City, NM

 

26,975

 

 

 

153

 

504

 

125

 

153

 

545

 

698

 

122

 

2005

 

Truth or Consequences, NM

 

24,010

 

 

 

10

 

34

 

83

 

11

 

100

 

111

 

39

 

2005

 

Las Vegas I, NV

 

47,882

 

 

(O)

1,851

 

2,986

 

279

 

1,851

 

3,258

 

5,109

 

839

 

2006

 

Las Vegas II, NV

 

48,850

 

 

(O)

3,354

 

5,411

 

173

 

3,355

 

5,579

 

8,934

 

1,438

 

2006

 

Jamaica, NY

 

88,415

 

 

 

2,043

 

11,658

 

1,067

 

2,043

 

10,248

 

12,291

 

2,305

 

2001

 

Bronx, NY

 

66,865

 

 

 

2,014

 

11,411

 

76

 

2,014

 

11,487

 

13,501

 

347

 

2010

 

Brooklyn, NY

 

56,970

 

 

 

1,795

 

10,172

 

14

 

1,795

 

10,186

 

11,981

 

 

2010

 

Queens, NY

 

61,090

 

 

 

1,601

 

9,073

 

95

 

1,601

 

9,168

 

10,769

 

111

 

2010

 

Wyckoff, NY

 

62,245

 

 

 

1,961

 

11,113

 

32

 

1,961

 

11,145

 

13,106

 

 

2010

 

New Rochelle, NY

 

48,431

 

 

(A)

1,673

 

4,827

 

125

 

1,673

 

4,343

 

6,016

 

777

 

2005

 

North Babylon, NY

 

78,188

 

 

 

225

 

2,514

 

4,034

 

568

 

5,887

 

6,455

 

1,915

 

1998

 

Riverhead, NY

 

38,240

 

 

(H)

1,068

 

1,149

 

159

 

1,068

 

1,120

 

2,188

 

235

 

2005

 

Southold, NY

 

58,795

 

 

(H)

2,079

 

2,238

 

209

 

2,079

 

2,093

 

4,172

 

437

 

2005

 

Boardman, OH

 

65,495

 

 

 

64

 

745

 

2,217

 

287

 

2,210

 

2,497

 

1,080

 

1980

 

Canton I, OH

 

39,750

 

 

(O)

138

 

679

 

305

 

137

 

888

 

1,025

 

179

 

2005

 

Canton II, OH

 

26,200

 

 

(O)

122

 

595

 

124

 

120

 

643

 

763

 

144

 

2005

 

Centerville I, OH

 

80,690

 

 

(O)

471

 

3,705

 

162

 

471

 

3,402

 

3,873

 

660

 

2004

 

Centerville II, OH

 

43,150

 

 

(C)

332

 

1,757

 

173

 

332

 

1,701

 

2,033

 

333

 

2004

 

Cleveland I, OH

 

46,000

 

 

 

525

 

2,592

 

121

 

524

 

2,392

 

2,916

 

486

 

2005

 

Cleveland II, OH

 

58,425

 

 

(O)

290

 

1,427

 

175

 

289

 

1,407

 

1,696

 

301

 

2005

 

Columbus, OH

 

72,155

 

 

(O)

1,234

 

3,151

 

98

 

1,239

 

3,240

 

4,479

 

806

 

2006

 

Dayton I, OH

 

43,100

 

 

(C)

323

 

2,070

 

131

 

323

 

1,934

 

2,257

 

379

 

2004

 

Dayton II, OH

 

48,149

 

 

(O)

441

 

2,176

 

188

 

440

 

2,094

 

2,534

 

417

 

2005

 

Euclid I, OH

 

46,710

 

 

(O)

200

 

1,053

 

1,980

 

317

 

2,899

 

3,216

 

1,717

 

1988

 

Euclid II, OH

 

47,275

 

 

(O)

359

 

 

1,721

 

461

 

1,599

 

2,060

 

493

 

1988

 

Grove City, OH

 

89,290

 

 

(O)

1,756

 

4,485

 

107

 

1,761

 

4,583

 

6,344

 

1,127

 

2006

 

Hilliard, OH

 

89,690

 

 

(O)

1,361

 

3,476

 

141

 

1,366

 

3,608

 

4,974

 

878

 

2006

 

Lakewood, OH

 

39,337

 

 

 

405

 

854

 

460

 

405

 

1,251

 

1,656

 

761

 

1989

 

Louisville, OH

 

53,900

 

 

(O)

257

 

1,260

 

157

 

255

 

1,251

 

1,506

 

256

 

2005

 

Marblehead, OH

 

52,300

 

 

(O)

374

 

1,843

 

170

 

373

 

1,791

 

2,164

 

377

 

2005

 

Mason, OH

 

33,900

 

 

(O)

127

 

1,419

 

109

 

149

 

1,483

 

1,632

 

590

 

1998

 

Mentor, OH

 

51,225

 

 

 

206

 

1,011

 

1,435

 

204

 

2,316

 

2,520

 

404

 

2005

 

Miamisburg, OH

 

59,930

 

 

(O)

375

 

2,410

 

268

 

375

 

2,360

 

2,735

 

445

 

2004

 

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

93,025

 

 

(O)

63

 

704

 

2,031

 

332

 

2,323

 

2,655

 

728

 

1980

 

North Canton I, OH

 

45,200

 

 

(O)

209

 

846

 

553

 

299

 

735

 

1,034

 

436

 

1979

 

North Canton II, OH

 

44,140

 

 

(O)

70

 

1,226

 

44

 

239

 

1,061

 

1,300

 

307

 

1983

 

North Olmsted I, OH

 

48,665

 

 

(O)

63

 

704

 

1,242

 

214

 

1,660

 

1,874

 

578

 

1979

 

North Olmsted II, OH

 

47,850

 

 

 

290

 

1,129

 

1,076

 

469

 

1,991

 

2,460

 

1,125

 

1988

 

North Randall, OH

 

80,099

 

 

 

515

 

2,323

 

2,922

 

898

 

4,399

 

5,297

 

1,260

 

1998

 

Perry, OH

 

63,700

 

 

(O)

290

 

1,427

 

124

 

288

 

1,365

 

1,653

 

287

 

2005

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

66,895

 

 

(O)

1,290

 

3,295

 

201

 

1,295

 

3,487

 

4,782

 

847

 

2006

 

Strongsville, OH

 

43,727

 

 

(O)

570

 

3,486

 

174

 

570

 

3,344

 

3,914

 

583

 

2007

 

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

90,281

 

 

 

525

 

766

 

2,859

 

935

 

3,183

 

4,118

 

1,014

 

1980

 

Westlake, OH

 

62,750

 

 

(O)

509

 

2,508

 

133

 

508

 

2,313

 

2,821

 

465

 

2005

 

Willoughby, OH

 

34,064

 

 

(O)

239

 

1,178

 

212

 

238

 

1,227

 

1,465

 

245

 

2005

 

Youngstown, OH

 

65,950

 

 

(A)

67

 

 

1,751

 

204

 

1,207

 

1,411

 

530

 

1977

 

Levittown, PA

 

76,180

 

 

 

926

 

5,296

 

889

 

926

 

5,218

 

6,144

 

1,455

 

2001

 

Philadelphia, PA

 

97,639

 

 

 

1,461

 

8,334

 

1,212

 

1,461

 

6,876

 

8,337

 

1,674

 

2001

 

Alcoa, TN

 

42,325

 

 

(E)

254

 

2,113

 

123

 

254

 

1,942

 

2,196

 

358

 

2005

 

F-33F-46



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Subsequent

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Antioch, TN

 

76,160

 

 

(O)

588

 

4,906

 

278

 

588

 

4,517

 

5,105

 

780

 

2005

 

Cordova I, TN

 

54,125

 

 

 

296

 

2,482

 

167

 

297

 

2,303

 

2,600

 

447

 

2005

 

Cordova II, TN

 

67,700

 

2,520

 

429

 

3,580

 

263

 

429

 

3,839

 

4,268

 

991

 

2006

 

Knoxville I, TN

 

29,337

 

 

(L)

99

 

1,113

 

231

 

102

 

1,317

 

1,419

 

511

 

1997

 

Knoxville II, TN

 

38,000

 

 

(L)

117

 

1,308

 

319

 

129

 

1,590

 

1,719

 

587

 

1997

 

Knoxville III, TN

 

45,736

 

 

(O)

182

 

2,053

 

729

 

331

 

2,593

 

2,924

 

888

 

1998

 

Knoxville IV, TN

 

58,752

 

 

(O)

158

 

1,771

 

753

 

310

 

2,343

 

2,653

 

768

 

1998

 

Knoxville V, TN

 

42,790

 

 

(L)

134

 

1,493

 

426

 

235

 

1,790

 

2,025

 

733

 

1998

 

Knoxville VI, TN

 

63,440

 

 

(E)

439

 

3,653

 

186

 

440

 

3,337

 

3,777

 

606

 

2005

 

Knoxville VII, TN

 

55,094

 

 

(E)

312

 

2,594

 

213

 

312

 

2,448

 

2,760

 

457

 

2005

 

Knoxville VIII, TN

 

95,868

 

 

(E)

585

 

4,869

 

239

 

586

 

4,444

 

5,030

 

806

 

2005

 

Memphis I, TN

 

92,320

 

 

(C)

677

 

3,880

 

1,349

 

677

 

4,384

 

5,061

 

1,109

 

2001

 

Memphis II, TN

 

71,710

 

 

(K)

395

 

2,276

 

420

 

395

 

2,198

 

2,593

 

560

 

2001

 

Memphis III, TN

 

40,807

 

 

 

212

 

1,779

 

203

 

213

 

1,734

 

1,947

 

352

 

2005

 

Memphis IV, TN

 

38,750

 

 

 

160

 

1,342

 

234

 

160

 

1,387

 

1,547

 

285

 

2005

 

Memphis V, TN

 

60,120

 

 

 

209

 

1,753

 

545

 

210

 

2,052

 

2,262

 

395

 

2005

 

Memphis VI, TN

 

108,771

 

 

(K)

462

 

3,851

 

315

 

462

 

4,162

 

4,624

 

1,078

 

2006

 

Memphis VII, TN

 

115,253

 

 

(O)

215

 

1,792

 

480

 

215

 

2,267

 

2,482

 

590

 

2006

 

Memphis VIII, TN

 

96,060

 

 

(O)

355

 

2,959

 

347

 

355

 

3,299

 

3,654

 

869

 

2006

 

Nashville I, TN

 

103,310

 

 

 

405

 

3,379

 

422

 

405

 

3,340

 

3,745

 

600

 

2005

 

Nashville II, TN

 

83,584

 

 

 

593

 

4,950

 

202

 

593

 

4,478

 

5,071

 

767

 

2005

 

Nashville III, TN

 

101,475

 

 

 

416

 

3,469

 

168

 

416

 

3,620

 

4,036

 

1,021

 

2006

 

Nashville IV, TN

 

102,450

 

5,443

 

992

 

8,274

 

248

 

992

 

8,519

 

9,511

 

2,334

 

2006

 

Austin I, TX

 

59,520

 

 

 

2,239

 

2,038

 

186

 

2,410

 

1,774

 

4,184

 

368

 

2005

 

Austin II, TX

 

65,241

 

 

(I)

734

 

3,894

 

188

 

738

 

4,073

 

4,811

 

995

 

2006

 

Austin III, TX

 

70,560

 

 

 

1,030

 

5,468

 

139

 

1,035

 

5,597

 

6,632

 

1,274

 

2006

 

Baytown, TX

 

38,950

 

 

(O)

946

 

863

 

202

 

948

 

941

 

1,889

 

162

 

2005

 

Bryan, TX

 

60,450

 

 

(O)

1,394

 

1,268

 

117

 

1,396

 

1,214

 

2,610

 

239

 

2005

 

College Station, TX

 

26,550

 

 

(D)

812

 

740

 

112

 

813

 

744

 

1,557

 

146

 

2005

 

Dallas, TX

 

58,382

 

 

(F)

2,475

 

2,253

 

288

 

2,475

 

2,232

 

4,707

 

417

 

2005

 

Denton, TX

 

60,836

 

1,948

 

553

 

2,936

 

162

 

569

 

3,077

 

3,646

 

699

 

2006

 

El Paso I, TX

 

59,652

 

 

(B)

1,983

 

1,805

 

254

 

1,984

 

1,808

 

3,792

 

340

 

2005

 

El Paso II, TX

 

48,704

 

 

(B)

1,319

 

1,201

 

154

 

1,320

 

1,188

 

2,508

 

222

 

2005

 

El Paso III, TX

 

71,276

 

 

(B)

2,408

 

2,192

 

167

 

2,409

 

2,060

 

4,469

 

376

 

2005

 

El Paso IV, TX

 

67,058

 

 

(B)

2,073

 

1,888

 

0

 

2,074

 

1,629

 

3,703

 

313

 

2005

 

El Paso V, TX

 

62,300

 

 

 

1,758

 

1,617

 

124

 

1,761

 

1,516

 

3,277

 

280

 

2005

 

El Paso VI, TX

 

36,570

 

 

 

660

 

607

 

143

 

662

 

660

 

1,322

 

127

 

2005

 

El Paso VII, TX

 

34,545

 

 

 

563

 

517

 

73

 

565

 

514

 

1,079

 

103

 

2005

 

Fort Worth I, TX

 

50,621

 

 

(F)

1,253

 

1,141

 

152

 

1,253

 

1,132

 

2,385

 

211

 

2005

 

Fort Worth II, TX

 

72,925

 

 

(F)

868

 

4,607

 

183

 

874

 

4,780

 

5,654

 

1,169

 

2006

 

Frisco I, TX

 

50,854

 

 

(A)

1,093

 

3,148

 

97

 

1,093

 

2,852

 

3,945

 

510

 

2005

 

Frisco II, TX

 

71,299

 

3,193

 

1,564

 

4,507

 

130

 

1,564

 

4,077

 

5,641

 

735

 

2005

 

Frisco III, TX

 

75,215

 

 

(F)

1,147

 

6,088

 

164

 

1,154

 

6,242

 

7,396

 

1,521

 

2006

 

Frisco IV, TX

 

74,835

 

 

 

719

 

4,072

 

2

 

719

 

4,074

 

4,793

 

307

 

2010

 

Garland I, TX

 

70,100

 

3,100

 

751

 

3,984

 

383

 

767

 

4,348

 

5,115

 

969

 

2006

 

Garland II, TX

 

68,425

 

 

(F)

862

 

4,578

 

123

 

862

 

4,696

 

5,558

 

1,011

 

2006

 

Greenville I, TX

 

59,385

 

 

(O)

1,848

 

1,682

 

83

 

1,848

 

1,533

 

3,381

 

277

 

2005

 

Greenville II, TX

 

44,900

 

 

(O)

1,337

 

1,217

 

86

 

1,337

 

1,133

 

2,470

 

202

 

2005

 

Houston I, TX

 

100,630

 

 

(O)

1,420

 

1,296

 

224

 

1,422

 

1,339

 

2,761

 

248

 

2005

 

Houston II, TX

 

71,300

 

 

(O)

1,510

 

1,377

 

18

 

1,512

 

1,203

 

2,715

 

249

 

2005

 

Houston III, TX

 

61,120

 

499

 

575

 

524

 

206

 

576

 

652

 

1,228

 

133

 

2005

 

Houston IV, TX

 

43,975

 

 

(D)

960

 

875

 

150

 

961

 

901

 

1,862

 

160

 

2005

 

Houston V, TX

 

125,930

 

4,121

 

1,153

 

6,122

 

394

 

1,156

 

6,505

 

7,661

 

1,441

 

2006

 

Keller, TX

 

61,885

 

2,420

 

890

 

4,727

 

118

 

890

 

4,841

 

5,731

 

1,192

 

2006

 

La Porte, TX

 

44,850

 

 

(O)

842

 

761

 

312

 

843

 

966

 

1,809

 

217

 

2005

 

Lewisville, TX

 

58,140

 

1,771

 

476

 

2,525

 

313

 

492

 

2,819

 

3,311

 

646

 

2006

 

Mansfield, TX

 

63,075

 

 

(F)

837

 

4,443

 

110

 

843

 

4,542

 

5,385

 

1,109

 

2006

 

McKinney I, TX

 

47,040

 

1,270

 

1,632

 

1,486

 

127

 

1,634

 

1,405

 

3,039

 

243

 

2005

 

McKinney II, TX

 

70,050

 

4,091

 

855

 

5,076

 

116

 

857

 

5,186

 

6,043

 

1,278

 

2006

 

North Richland Hills, TX

 

57,175

 

 

(F)

2,252

 

2,049

 

155

 

2,252

 

1,924

 

4,176

 

360

 

2005

 

Roanoke, TX

 

59,300

 

 

(F)

1,337

 

1,217

 

115

 

1,337

 

1,162

 

2,499

 

219

 

2005

 

San Antonio I, TX

 

73,330

 

 

(O)

2,895

 

2,635

 

197

 

2,895

 

2,475

 

5,370

 

431

 

2005

 

San Antonio II, TX

 

73,230

 

 

(O)

1,047

 

5,558

 

89

 

1,052

 

5,639

 

6,691

 

1,209

 

2006

 

San Antonio III, TX

 

72,075

 

 

(O)

996

 

5,286

 

90

 

996

 

5,372

 

6,368

 

1,067

 

2007

 

Sherman I, TX

 

54,975

 

1,477

 

1,904

 

1,733

 

96

 

1,906

 

1,587

 

3,493

 

281

 

2005

 

Sherman II, TX

 

48,425

 

1,759

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

148

 

1,337

 

1,196

 

2,533

 

218

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Subsequent
to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(D)

 

Year
Acquired/
Developed

 

Manchester I, CT

 

47,025

 

 

 

540

 

3,096

 

351

 

563

 

2,674

 

3,237

 

1,080

 

2002

 

Manchester II, CT

 

52,725

 

 

 

996

 

1,730

 

246

 

996

 

1,669

 

2,665

 

480

 

2005

 

Milford, CT

 

44,885

 

 

 

87

 

1,050

 

1,122

 

274

 

1,701

 

1,975

 

806

 

1996

 

Monroe, CT

 

58,500

 

 

 

2,004

 

3,483

 

570

 

2,004

 

3,369

 

5,373

 

1,040

 

2005

 

Mystic, CT

 

50,825

 

 

 

136

 

1,645

 

1,842

 

410

 

2,755

 

3,165

 

1,354

 

1996

 

Newington I, CT

 

42,620

 

 

 

1,059

 

1,840

 

156

 

1,059

 

1,702

 

2,761

 

502

 

2005

 

Newington II, CT

 

36,140

 

 

 

911

 

1,584

 

228

 

911

 

1,539

 

2,450

 

449

 

2005

 

Norwalk, CT

 

30,242

 

 

 

646

 

3,187

 

45

 

646

 

3,232

 

3,878

 

145

 

2012

 

Old Saybrook I, CT

 

86,950

 

 

 

3,092

 

5,374

 

434

 

3,092

 

4,954

 

8,046

 

1,491

 

2005

 

Old Saybrook II, CT

 

26,425

 

 

 

1,135

 

1,973

 

216

 

1,135

 

1,861

 

2,996

 

569

 

2005

 

Shelton, CT

 

78,430

 

 

 

1,449

 

8,221

 

175

 

1,449

 

7,313

 

8,762

 

605

 

2011

 

South Windsor, CT

 

72,075

 

 

 

90

 

1,127

 

1,204

 

272

 

1,944

 

2,216

 

841

 

1996

 

Stamford, CT

 

28,907

 

 

 

1,941

 

3,374

 

76

 

1,941

 

2,915

 

4,856

 

866

 

2005

 

Wilton, CT

 

84,515

 

12,853

 

2,409

 

12,261

 

148

 

2,421

 

12,469

 

14,890

 

723

 

2012

 

Washington I, DC

 

63,085

 

 

(B)

871

 

12,759

 

389

 

894

 

10,466

 

11,360

 

1,962

 

2008

 

Washington II, DC

 

83,192

 

 

 

3,152

 

13,612

 

104

 

3,154

 

11,941

 

15,095

 

760

 

2011

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

37,958

 

 

 

529

 

3,054

 

1,552

 

813

 

3,699

 

4,512

 

1,231

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach I, FL

 

61,749

 

 

 

667

 

3,796

 

1,679

 

958

 

4,386

 

5,344

 

1,495

 

2001

 

Boynton Beach II, FL

 

61,629

 

 

 

1,030

 

2,968

 

320

 

1,030

 

2,852

 

3,882

 

754

 

2005

 

Bradenton I, FL

 

68,441

 

 

 

1,180

 

3,324

 

218

 

1,180

 

3,022

 

4,202

 

830

 

2004

 

Bradenton II, FL

 

87,988

 

 

 

1,931

 

5,561

 

885

 

1,931

 

5,351

 

7,282

 

1,461

 

2004

 

Cape Coral, FL

 

76,627

 

 

 

472

 

2,769

 

2,508

 

830

 

4,344

 

5,174

 

1,745

 

2000

 

Coconut Creek, FL

 

78,783

 

 

 

1,189

 

5,863

 

86

 

1,189

 

5,949

 

7,138

 

237

 

2012

 

Dania Beach, FL

 

168,274

 

 

 

3,584

 

10,324

 

1,112

 

3,584

 

9,939

 

13,523

 

2,743

 

2004

 

Dania, FL

 

58,145

 

 

 

205

 

2,068

 

1,427

 

481

 

2,797

 

3,278

 

1,353

 

1996

 

Davie, FL

 

80,985

 

 

 

1,268

 

7,183

 

798

 

1,373

 

5,717

 

7,090

 

2,459

 

2001

 

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

57,230

 

 

 

946

 

2,999

 

1,999

 

1,311

 

4,509

 

5,820

 

1,598

 

1998

 

Delray Beach I, FL

 

67,813

 

 

 

798

 

4,539

 

671

 

883

 

4,210

 

5,093

 

1,503

 

2001

 

Delray Beach II, FL

 

75,834

 

 

 

957

 

4,718

 

19

 

957

 

4,737

 

5,694

 

1,467

 

2013

 

Fernandina Beach, FL

 

113,091

 

 

 

378

 

4,222

 

3,656

 

643

 

7,000

 

7,643

 

2,362

 

1996

 

Ft. Lauderdale I, FL

 

70,063

 

 

 

937

 

3,646

 

2,419

 

1,384

 

5,430

 

6,814

 

1,955

 

1999

 

Ft. Lauderdale II, FL

 

46,096

 

 

 

862

 

4,250

 

0

 

862

 

4,251

 

5,113

 

1,800

 

2013

 

Ft. Myers, FL

 

67,562

 

 

 

303

 

3,329

 

730

 

328

 

3,440

 

3,768

 

1,385

 

1999

 

Jacksonville I, FL

 

80,215

 

 

 

1,862

 

5,362

 

63

 

1,862

 

4,744

 

6,606

 

1,154

 

2005

 

Jacksonville II, FL

 

65,045

 

 

 

950

 

7,004

 

85

 

950

 

5,536

 

6,486

 

1,098

 

2007

 

Jacksonville III, FL

 

65,590

 

 

 

860

 

7,409

 

974

 

1,670

 

5,982

 

7,652

 

1,191

 

2007

 

Jacksonville IV, FL

 

77,535

 

 

 

870

 

8,049

 

1,015

 

1,651

 

6,989

 

8,640

 

1,393

 

2007

 

Jacksonville V, FL

 

82,235

 

 

 

1,220

 

8,210

 

294

 

1,220

 

6,795

 

8,015

 

1,350

 

2007

 

Lake Worth, FL

 

161,934

 

 

 

183

 

6,597

 

7,012

 

183

 

10,929

 

11,112

 

4,591

 

1998

 

Lakeland, FL

 

49,079

 

 

 

81

 

896

 

1,065

 

256

 

1,378

 

1,634

 

791

 

1994

 

Kendall, FL

 

75,495

 

 

(B)

2,350

 

8,106

 

178

 

2,350

 

6,511

 

8,861

 

1,293

 

2007

 

Leisure City, FL

 

56,042

 

 

 

409

 

2,018

 

108

 

409

 

2,125

 

2,534

 

87

 

2012

 

Lutz I, FL

 

66,795

 

 

 

901

 

2,478

 

209

 

901

 

2,301

 

3,202

 

621

 

2004

 

Lutz II, FL

 

69,232

 

 

 

992

 

2,868

 

310

 

992

 

2,715

 

3,707

 

720

 

2004

 

Margate I, FL

 

54,385

 

 

 

161

 

1,763

 

1,817

 

399

 

2,930

 

3,329

 

1,377

 

1996

 

Margate II, FL

 

65,180

 

 

 

132

 

1,473

 

1,793

 

383

 

2,655

 

3,038

 

1,183

 

1996

 

Merritt Island, FL

 

50,291

 

 

 

716

 

2,983

 

596

 

796

 

2,843

 

3,639

 

865

 

2002

 

Miami I, FL

 

46,275

 

 

 

179

 

1,999

 

1,768

 

484

 

3,080

 

3,564

 

1,695

 

1996

 

Miami II, FL

 

67,010

 

 

 

253

 

2,544

 

1,439

 

561

 

3,168

 

3,729

 

1,609

 

1996

 

Miami III, FL

 

150,735

 

 

 

4,577

 

13,185

 

682

 

4,577

 

12,043

 

16,620

 

2,976

 

2005

 

Miami IV, FL

 

76,337

 

 

 

1,852

 

10,494

 

863

 

1,963

 

9,796

 

11,759

 

854

 

2011

 

Miramar, FL

 

75,655

 

 

 

1,206

 

5,944

 

16

 

1,206

 

5,961

 

7,167

 

649

 

2013

 

Naples I, FL

 

48,150

 

 

 

90

 

1,010

 

2,487

 

270

 

3,122

 

3,392

 

1,338

 

1996

 

Naples II, FL

 

65,850

 

 

 

148

 

1,652

 

4,291

 

558

 

5,250

 

5,808

 

2,124

 

1997

 

Naples III, FL

 

79,960

 

 

 

139

 

1,561

 

4,072

 

598

 

4,326

 

4,924

 

2,063

 

1997

 

Naples IV, FL

 

40,575

 

 

 

262

 

2,980

 

561

 

407

 

2,958

 

3,365

 

1,424

 

1998

 

Ocoee, FL

 

76,050

 

 

 

1,286

 

3,705

 

170

 

1,286

 

3,358

 

4,644

 

854

 

2005

 

Orange City, FL

 

59,580

 

 

 

1,191

 

3,209

 

192

 

1,191

 

2,913

 

4,104

 

799

 

2004

 

Orlando II, FL

 

63,084

 

 

 

1,589

 

4,576

 

137

 

1,589

 

4,074

 

5,663

 

1,058

 

2005

 

Orlando III, FL

 

101,330

 

 

 

1,209

 

7,768

 

637

 

1,209

 

7,018

 

8,227

 

1,489

 

2006

 

Orlando IV, FL

 

76,565

 

 

 

633

 

3,587

 

95

 

633

 

3,178

 

3,811

 

311

 

2010

 

Orlando V, FL

 

75,358

 

 

 

950

 

4,685

 

80

 

950

 

4,765

 

5,715

 

165

 

2012

 

Oviedo, FL

 

49,276

 

 

 

440

 

2,824

 

503

 

440

 

2,660

 

3,100

 

592

 

2006

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

67,321

 

 

 

337

 

3,772

 

2,719

 

953

 

5,349

 

6,302

 

3,131

 

1997

 

Royal Palm Beach II, FL

 

81,405

 

 

 

1,640

 

8,607

 

201

 

1,640

 

7,147

 

8,787

 

1,420

 

2007

 

Sanford, FL

 

61,810

 

 

 

453

 

2,911

 

147

 

453

 

2,521

 

2,974

 

542

 

2006

 

Sarasota, FL

 

71,152

 

 

 

333

 

3,656

 

1,307

 

529

 

4,175

 

4,704

 

1,633

 

1999

 

St. Augustine, FL

 

59,725

 

 

 

135

 

1,515

 

3,327

 

383

 

4,282

 

4,665

 

1,816

 

1996

 

Stuart, FL

 

87,240

 

 

 

324

 

3,625

 

2,927

 

685

 

5,621

 

6,306

 

2,455

 

1997

 

SW Ranches, FL

 

64,955

 

 

 

1,390

 

7,598

 

131

 

1,390

 

5,867

 

7,257

 

1,168

 

2007

 

Tampa, FL

 

83,838

 

 

 

2,670

 

6,249

 

107

 

2,670

 

5,002

 

7,672

 

996

 

2007

 

West Palm Beach I, FL

 

68,061

 

 

 

719

 

3,420

 

1,534

 

835

 

3,979

 

4,814

 

1,409

 

2001

 

West Palm Beach II, FL

 

94,503

 

 

 

2,129

 

8,671

 

262

 

2,129

 

7,630

 

9,759

 

2,110

 

2004

 

West Palm Beach III, FL

 

77,851

 

 

 

804

 

3,962

 

15

 

804

 

3,976

 

4,780

 

136

 

2012

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

90,501

 

 

 

806

 

4,720

 

980

 

967

 

4,102

 

5,069

 

1,298

 

2001

 

Atlanta, GA

 

66,675

 

 

 

822

 

4,053

 

29

 

822

 

4,082

 

4,904

 

173

 

2012

 

Austell, GA

 

83,625

 

 

 

1,635

 

4,711

 

176

 

1,643

 

4,233

 

5,876

 

940

 

2006

 

Decatur, GA

 

145,280

 

 

 

616

 

6,776

 

207

 

616

 

6,078

 

6,694

 

3,057

 

1998

 

Duluth, GA

 

70,885

 

 

 

373

 

2,044

 

160

 

373

 

1,880

 

2,253

 

149

 

2011

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

73,765

 

 

 

546

 

2,903

 

313

 

546

 

2,800

 

3,346

 

222

 

2011

 

Norcross I, GA

 

85,420

 

 

 

514

 

2,930

 

783

 

632

 

2,983

 

3,615

 

1,178

 

2001

 

Norcross II, GA

 

52,295

 

 

 

366

 

2,025

 

151

 

366

 

1,892

 

2,258

 

149

 

2011

 

Norcross III, GA

 

47,270

 

 

 

938

 

4,625

 

39

 

938

 

4,665

 

5,603

 

272

 

2012

 

Norcross IV, GA

 

57,505

 

 

 

576

 

2,839

 

24

 

576

 

2,863

 

3,439

 

121

 

2012

 

Peachtree City I, GA

 

49,875

 

 

 

435

 

2,532

 

622

 

529

 

2,525

 

3,054

 

827

 

2001

 

Peachtree City II, GA

 

60,250

 

 

 

398

 

1,963

 

11

 

398

 

1,974

 

2,372

 

84

 

2012

 

Smyrna, GA

 

57,015

 

 

 

750

 

4,271

 

237

 

750

 

3,478

 

4,228

 

1,106

 

2001

 

Snellville, GA

 

80,000

 

 

 

1,660

 

4,781

 

279

 

1,660

 

4,400

 

6,060

 

904

 

2007

 

Suwanee I, GA

 

84,860

 

 

 

1,737

 

5,010

 

205

 

1,737

 

4,520

 

6,257

 

948

 

2007

 

 

F-34F-47



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Carrying Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

at December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Building
and Improvements

 

Subsequent to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Building and
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation (N)

 

Year Acquired /
Developed

 

Spring, TX

 

72,751

 

 

(O)

580

 

3,081

 

114

 

580

 

3,192

 

3,772

 

798

 

2006

 

Murray I, UT

 

60,180

 

 

(B)

3,851

 

1,016

 

263

 

3,845

 

1,117

 

4,962

 

215

 

2005

 

Murray II, UT

 

71,221

 

 

(B)

2,147

 

567

 

322

 

2,148

 

794

 

2,942

 

158

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

56,446

 

 

(B)

2,695

 

712

 

237

 

2,696

 

839

 

3,535

 

173

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

53,676

 

 

(B)

2,074

 

548

 

206

 

2,075

 

668

 

2,743

 

139

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

69,475

 

 

(J)

1,680

 

4,840

 

257

 

1,680

 

4,500

 

6,180

 

714

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

61,257

 

 

(J)

1,757

 

5,062

 

330

 

1,758

 

4,767

 

6,525

 

752

 

2005

 

McLearen, VA

 

69,490

 

 

 

1,482

 

8,400

 

 

1,482

 

8,400

 

9,882

 

 

2010

 

Mannasas, VA

 

73,045

 

 

 

860

 

4,872

 

6

 

860

 

4,879

 

5,739

 

97

 

2010

 

Milwaukee, WI

 

58,500

 

 

(O)

375

 

4,333

 

134

 

375

 

3,908

 

4,283

 

762

 

2004

 

USIFB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,668

 

 

11,668

 

11,668

 

493

 

 

 

Corporate Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,672

 

 

8,672

 

8,672

 

2,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,634,618

 

 

 

351,390

 

1,283,657

 

231,889

 

374,569

 

1,368,452

 

1,743,021

 

314,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount at
December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Subsequent
to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(D)

 

Year
Acquired/
Developed

 

Suwanee II, GA

 

79,590

 

 

 

800

 

6,942

 

33

 

622

 

5,771

 

6,393

 

1,150

 

2007

 

Addison, IL

 

31,325

 

 

 

428

 

3,531

 

316

 

428

 

3,347

 

3,775

 

907

 

2004

 

Aurora, IL

 

73,985

 

 

 

644

 

3,652

 

148

 

644

 

3,280

 

3,924

 

894

 

2004

 

Bartlett, IL

 

51,425

 

 

 

931

 

2,493

 

261

 

931

 

2,372

 

3,303

 

634

 

2004

 

Hanover, IL

 

41,190

 

 

 

1,126

 

2,197

 

244

 

1,126

 

2,102

 

3,228

 

565

 

2004

 

Bellwood, IL

 

86,650

 

 

 

1,012

 

5,768

 

779

 

1,012

 

5,249

 

6,261

 

1,779

 

2001

 

Des Plaines, IL

 

71,520

 

 

 

1,564

 

4,327

 

464

 

1,564

 

4,152

 

5,716

 

1,115

 

2004

 

Elk Grove Village, IL

 

64,129

 

 

 

1,446

 

3,535

 

267

 

1,446

 

3,274

 

4,720

 

920

 

2004

 

Evanston, IL

 

58,050

 

 

 

1,103

 

5,440

 

2

 

1,103

 

5,442

 

6,545

 

917

 

2013

 

Glenview, IL

 

100,115

 

 

 

3,740

 

10,367

 

377

 

3,740

 

9,279

 

13,019

 

2,524

 

2004

 

Gurnee, IL

 

80,300

 

 

 

1,521

 

5,440

 

256

 

1,521

 

4,933

 

6,454

 

1,375

 

2004

 

Harvey, IL

 

60,090

 

 

 

869

 

3,635

 

203

 

869

 

3,299

 

4,168

 

897

 

2004

 

Joliet, IL

 

72,865

 

 

 

547

 

4,704

 

204

 

547

 

4,249

 

4,796

 

1,161

 

2004

 

Kildeer, IL

 

46,485

 

 

 

2,102

 

2,187

 

214

 

1,997

 

2,200

 

4,197

 

565

 

2004

 

Lombard, IL

 

57,739

 

 

 

1,305

 

3,938

 

656

 

1,305

 

3,993

 

5,298

 

1,125

 

2004

 

Mount Prospect, IL

 

64,750

 

 

 

1,701

 

3,114

 

322

 

1,701

 

2,984

 

4,685

 

801

 

2004

 

Mundelein, IL

 

44,700

 

 

 

1,498

 

2,782

 

220

 

1,498

 

2,590

 

4,088

 

694

 

2004

 

North Chicago, IL

 

53,400

 

 

 

1,073

 

3,006

 

348

 

1,073

 

2,869

 

3,942

 

786

 

2004

 

Plainfield I, IL

 

53,900

 

 

 

1,770

 

1,715

 

234

 

1,740

 

1,657

 

3,397

 

439

 

2004

 

Plainfield II, IL

 

51,900

 

 

 

694

 

2,000

 

150

 

694

 

1,817

 

2,511

 

462

 

2005

 

Schaumburg, IL

 

31,160

 

 

 

538

 

645

 

164

 

538

 

673

 

1,211

 

178

 

2004

 

Streamwood, IL

 

64,305

 

 

 

1,447

 

1,662

 

312

 

1,447

 

1,662

 

3,109

 

455

 

2004

 

Warrenville, IL

 

48,796

 

 

 

1,066

 

3,072

 

150

 

1,066

 

2,790

 

3,856

 

722

 

2005

 

Waukegan, IL

 

79,500

 

 

 

1,198

 

4,363

 

319

 

1,198

 

4,029

 

5,227

 

1,105

 

2004

 

West Chicago, IL

 

48,175

 

 

 

1,071

 

2,249

 

250

 

1,071

 

2,141

 

3,212

 

587

 

2004

 

Westmont, IL

 

53,450

 

 

 

1,155

 

3,873

 

196

 

1,155

 

3,529

 

4,684

 

946

 

2004

 

Wheeling I, IL

 

54,210

 

 

 

857

 

3,213

 

301

 

857

 

3,042

 

3,899

 

833

 

2004

 

Wheeling II, IL

 

67,825

 

 

 

793

 

3,816

 

423

 

793

 

3,688

 

4,481

 

1,005

 

2004

 

Woodridge, IL

 

50,241

 

 

 

943

 

3,397

 

170

 

943

 

3,091

 

4,034

 

846

 

2004

 

Boston I, MA

 

33,286

 

 

 

538

 

3,048

 

81

 

538

 

2,705

 

3,243

 

272

 

2010

 

Boston II, MA

 

60,420

 

 

 

1,516

 

8,628

 

328

 

1,516

 

7,120

 

8,636

 

2,356

 

2002

 

Leominster, MA

 

54,023

 

 

 

90

 

1,519

 

2,426

 

338

 

3,356

 

3,694

 

1,597

 

1998

 

Medford, MA

 

58,725

 

 

 

1,330

 

7,165

 

231

 

1,330

 

5,918

 

7,248

 

1,143

 

2007

 

Stoneham, MA

 

62,100

 

 

 

1,558

 

7,679

 

2

 

1,558

 

7,681

 

9,239

 

1,113

 

2013

 

Baltimore, MD

 

93,550

 

 

 

1,050

 

5,997

 

1,280

 

1,173

 

5,854

 

7,027

 

2,081

 

2001

 

Beltsville, MD

 

63,707

 

 

 

1,277

 

6,295

 

25

 

1,277

 

6,320

 

7,597

 

2,002

 

2013

 

California, MD

 

77,840

 

 

 

1,486

 

4,280

 

162

 

1,486

 

3,850

 

5,336

 

1,049

 

2004

 

Clinton, MD

 

84,025

 

8,500

 

2,182

 

10,757

 

8

 

2,182

 

10,765

 

12,947

 

957

 

2013

 

District Heights, MD

 

78,720

 

 

 

1,527

 

8,313

 

451

 

1,527

 

7,639

 

9,166

 

563

 

2011

 

Elkridge, MD

 

63,675

 

 

 

1,155

 

5,695

 

0

 

1,155

 

5,695

 

6,850

 

334

 

2013

 

Gaithersburg, MD

 

87,045

 

 

 

3,124

 

9,000

 

385

 

3,124

 

8,126

 

11,250

 

2,192

 

2005

 

Hyattsville, MD

 

52,665

 

 

 

1,113

 

5,485

 

27

 

1,113

 

5,513

 

6,626

 

2,040

 

2013

 

Laurel, MD

 

162,796

 

 

 

1,409

 

8,035

 

3,589

 

1,928

 

9,521

 

11,449

 

3,220

 

2001

 

Temple Hills, MD

 

97,250

 

 

 

1,541

 

8,788

 

2,228

 

1,800

 

9,170

 

10,970

 

3,671

 

2001

 

Upper Marlboro, MD

 

62,290

 

 

 

1,309

 

6,455

 

46

 

1,309

 

6,501

 

7,810

 

3,516

 

2013

 

Belmont, NC

 

81,850

 

 

 

385

 

2,196

 

693

 

451

 

2,209

 

2,660

 

763

 

2001

 

Burlington I, NC

 

109,396

 

 

 

498

 

2,837

 

567

 

498

 

2,771

 

3,269

 

982

 

2001

 

Burlington II, NC

 

42,205

 

 

 

320

 

1,829

 

350

 

340

 

1,747

 

2,087

 

591

 

2001

 

Cary, NC

 

112,333

 

 

 

543

 

3,097

 

520

 

543

 

3,345

 

3,888

 

1,294

 

2001

 

Charlotte, NC

 

69,000

 

 

 

782

 

4,429

 

1,433

 

1,068

 

4,668

 

5,736

 

1,435

 

2002

 

Raleigh, NC

 

48,675

 

 

 

209

 

2,398

 

312

 

296

 

2,240

 

2,536

 

1,067

 

1998

 

Bordentown, NJ

 

50,600

 

 

 

457

 

2,255

 

19

 

457

 

2,274

 

2,731

 

97

 

2012

 

Brick, NJ

 

51,725

 

 

 

234

 

2,762

 

1,424

 

485

 

3,386

 

3,871

 

1,724

 

1996

 

Cherry Hill I, NJ

 

51,600

 

 

 

222

 

1,260

 

78

 

222

 

1,156

 

1,378

 

119

 

2010

 

Cherry Hill II, NJ

 

64,850

 

 

 

471

 

2,323

 

54

 

471

 

2,377

 

2,848

 

84

 

2012

 

Clifton, NJ

 

105,450

 

 

 

4,346

 

12,520

 

216

 

4,340

 

11,057

 

15,397

 

2,815

 

2005

 

Cranford, NJ

 

91,280

 

 

 

290

 

3,493

 

2,369

 

779

 

4,697

 

5,476

 

2,249

 

1996

 

East Hanover, NJ

 

107,679

 

 

 

504

 

5,763

 

3,925

 

1,315

 

7,832

 

9,147

 

3,899

 

1996

 

Egg Harbor I, NJ

 

35,425

 

 

 

104

 

510

 

26

 

104

 

525

 

629

 

53

 

2010

 

Egg Harbor II, NJ

 

70,400

 

 

 

284

 

1,608

 

172

 

284

 

1,560

 

1,844

 

164

 

2010

 

Elizabeth, NJ

 

38,830

 

 

 

751

 

2,164

 

392

 

751

 

2,239

 

2,990

 

574

 

2005

 

Fairview, NJ

 

27,876

 

 

 

246

 

2,759

 

436

 

246

 

2,616

 

2,862

 

1,434

 

1997

 

Freehold, NJ

 

81,470

 

 

 

1,086

 

5,355

 

72

 

1,086

 

5,426

 

6,512

 

219

 

2012

 

Hamilton, NJ

 

70,550

 

 

 

1,885

 

5,430

 

243

 

1,893

 

4,941

 

6,834

 

1,095

 

2006

 

Hoboken, NJ

 

34,180

 

 

 

1,370

 

3,947

 

619

 

1,370

 

3,975

 

5,345

 

1,068

 

2005

 

Linden, NJ

 

100,425

 

 

 

517

 

6,008

 

2,142

 

1,043

 

6,670

 

7,713

 

3,611

 

1996

 

Lumberton, NJ

 

95,975

 

 

 

987

 

4,864

 

60

 

987

 

4,924

 

5,911

 

210

 

2012

 

Morris Township, NJ

 

71,976

 

 

 

500

 

5,602

 

2,657

 

1,072

 

6,682

 

7,754

 

4,567

 

1997

 

Parsippany, NJ

 

66,325

 

 

 

475

 

5,322

 

1,981

 

844

 

6,008

 

6,852

 

3,044

 

1997

 

Rahway, NJ

 

83,171

 

 

 

1,486

 

7,326

 

2

 

1,486

 

7,328

 

8,814

 

1,665

 

2013

 

Randolph, NJ

 

52,565

 

 

 

855

 

4,872

 

1,291

 

1,108

 

4,829

 

5,937

 

1,671

 

2002

 

Sewell, NJ

 

57,826

 

 

 

484

 

2,766

 

1,298

 

706

 

3,213

 

3,919

 

1,097

 

2001

 

Somerset, NJ

 

57,585

 

 

 

1,243

 

6,129

 

55

 

1,243

 

6,184

 

7,427

 

245

 

2012

 

Whippany, NJ

 

92,270

 

 

 

2,153

 

10,615

 

23

 

2,153

 

10,638

 

12,791

 

246

 

2013

 

Albuquerque I, NM

 

65,927

 

 

(A)

1,039

 

3,395

 

269

 

1,039

 

3,080

 

4,119

 

852

 

2005

 

Albuquerque II, NM

 

58,511

 

 

(A)

1,163

 

3,801

 

254

 

1,163

 

3,433

 

4,596

 

951

 

2005

 

Albuquerque III, NM

 

57,536

 

 

(A)

664

 

2,171

 

310

 

664

 

2,093

 

2,757

 

573

 

2005

 

Las Vegas I, NV

 

48,332

 

 

 

1,851

 

2,986

 

397

 

1,851

 

2,972

 

4,823

 

844

 

2006

 

Las Vegas II, NV

 

48,850

 

 

 

3,354

 

5,411

 

297

 

3,355

 

5,127

 

8,482

 

1,466

 

2006

 

Bronx I, NY

 

68,698

 

 

 

2,014

 

11,411

 

670

 

2,014

 

10,488

 

12,502

 

1,083

 

2010

 

Bronx II, NY

 

90,170

 

 

 

0

 

31,561

 

82

 

0

 

31,109

 

31,109

 

1,718

 

2011

 

Bronx III, NY

 

106,065

 

 

 

6,017

 

33,999

 

93

 

6,017

 

29,745

 

35,762

 

2,316

 

2011

 

Bronx IV, NY

 

75,080

 

 

 

0

 

22,830

 

88

 

0

 

20,264

 

20,264

 

1,292

 

2011

 

Bronx V, NY

 

54,733

 

 

 

0

 

17,564

 

151

 

0

 

15,604

 

15,604

 

1,067

 

2011

 

Bronx VI, NY

 

39,495

 

 

 

0

 

15,095

 

70

 

0

 

13,134

 

13,134

 

1,117

 

2011

 

Bronx VII, NY

 

78,625

 

8,945

 

0

 

22,512

 

54

 

0

 

22,676

 

22,676

 

1,320

 

2012

 

Bronx VIII, NY

 

30,550

 

3,140

 

1,245

 

6,137

 

103

 

1,251

 

6,270

 

7,521

 

361

 

2012

 

Bronx IX, NY

 

148,570

 

24,145

 

7,967

 

39,279

 

494

 

7,967

 

39,771

 

47,738

 

2,123

 

2012

 

Bronx X, NY

 

159,780

 

28,523

 

9,090

 

44,816

 

228

 

9,090

 

45,044

 

54,134

 

2,041

 

2012

 

Brooklyn I, NY

 

57,020

 

 

 

1,795

 

10,172

 

204

 

1,795

 

8,960

 

10,755

 

924

 

2010

 

Brooklyn II, NY

 

60,920

 

 

 

1,601

 

9,073

 

417

 

1,601

 

8,192

 

9,793

 

837

 

2010

 

Brooklyn III, NY

 

41,635

 

 

 

3,195

 

15,657

 

70

 

3,195

 

15,809

 

19,004

 

818

 

2011

 

Brooklyn IV, NY

 

37,467

 

 

 

2,500

 

12,252

 

127

 

2,500

 

12,442

 

14,942

 

716

 

2011

 

Brooklyn V, NY

 

47,010

 

 

 

2,207

 

10,814

 

68

 

2,207

 

10,936

 

13,143

 

853

 

2011

 

Brooklyn VI, NY

 

75,980

 

 

 

4,016

 

19,680

 

49

 

4,016

 

19,836

 

23,852

 

1,482

 

2011

 

F-48



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount at
December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Subsequent
to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(D)

 

Year
Acquired/
Developed

 

Brooklyn VII, NY

 

72,685

 

 

 

5,816

 

28,498

 

94

 

5,816

 

28,756

 

34,572

 

1,839

 

2011

 

Jamaica I, NY

 

88,485

 

 

 

2,043

 

11,658

 

1,542

 

2,043

 

10,577

 

12,620

 

3,867

 

2001

 

Jamaica II, NY

 

91,245

 

 

 

5,496

 

26,930

 

116

 

5,496

 

27,189

 

32,685

 

1,797

 

2011

 

New Rochelle I, NY

 

46,068

 

 

 

1,673

 

4,827

 

390

 

1,673

 

4,568

 

6,241

 

1,137

 

2005

 

New Rochelle II, NY

 

63,145

 

8,676

 

3,167

 

2,713

 

248

 

3,762

 

18,794

 

22,556

 

1,053

 

2012

 

North Babylon, NY

 

78,188

 

 

 

225

 

2,514

 

4,071

 

568

 

5,497

 

6,065

 

2,383

 

1998

 

Riverhead, NY

 

38,340

 

 

 

1,068

 

1,149

 

190

 

1,068

 

1,106

 

2,174

 

330

 

2005

 

Southold, NY

 

59,451

 

 

 

2,079

 

2,238

 

240

 

2,079

 

2,073

 

4,152

 

633

 

2005

 

Staten Island, NY

 

96,823

 

 

 

1,919

 

9,463

 

3

 

1,919

 

9,466

 

11,385

 

707

 

2013

 

Tuckahoe, NY

 

51,343

 

 

 

1,516

 

13,236

 

149

 

1,516

 

7,614

 

9,130

 

1,051

 

2011

 

West Hempstead, NY

 

84,507

 

 

 

2,237

 

11,030

 

101

 

2,237

 

11,130

 

13,367

 

444

 

2012

 

White Plains, NY

 

86,400

 

 

 

3,295

 

18,049

 

833

 

3,295

 

16,391

 

19,686

 

1,389

 

2011

 

Woodhaven, NY

 

50,665

 

 

 

2,028

 

11,285

 

45

 

2,028

 

10,032

 

12,060

 

680

 

2011

 

Wyckoff, NY

 

61,835

 

 

 

1,961

 

11,113

 

172

 

1,961

 

9,803

 

11,764

 

933

 

2010

 

Yorktown, NY

 

78,615

 

 

 

2,710

 

13,338

 

48

 

2,710

 

13,399

 

16,109

 

713

 

2011

 

Cleveland I, OH

 

46,000

 

 

 

525

 

2,592

 

145

 

524

 

2,388

 

2,912

 

669

 

2005

 

Cleveland II, OH

 

58,425

 

 

 

290

 

1,427

 

170

 

289

 

1,346

 

1,635

 

379

 

2005

 

Columbus, OH

 

71,905

 

 

 

1,234

 

3,151

 

41

 

1,239

 

2,716

 

3,955

 

691

 

2006

 

Grove City, OH

 

89,290

 

 

 

1,756

 

4,485

 

158

 

1,761

 

4,025

 

5,786

 

983

 

2006

 

Hilliard, OH

 

89,690

 

 

 

1,361

 

3,476

 

190

 

1,366

 

3,178

 

4,544

 

776

 

2006

 

Lakewood, OH

 

39,337

 

 

 

405

 

854

 

513

 

405

 

1,235

 

1,640

 

848

 

1989

 

Middleburg Heights, OH

 

93,200

 

 

 

63

 

704

 

2,161

 

332

 

2,257

 

2,589

 

1,014

 

1980

 

North Olmsted I, OH

 

48,665

 

 

 

63

 

704

 

1,322

 

214

 

1,586

 

1,800

 

789

 

1979

 

North Olmsted II, OH

 

47,850

 

 

 

290

 

1,129

 

1,127

 

469

 

1,993

 

2,462

 

1,331

 

1988

 

North Randall, OH

 

80,239

 

 

 

515

 

2,323

 

3,021

 

898

 

4,196

 

5,094

 

1,720

 

1998

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

67,295

 

 

 

1,290

 

3,295

 

233

 

1,295

 

3,074

 

4,369

 

764

 

2006

 

Strongsville, OH

 

43,507

 

 

 

570

 

3,486

 

329

 

570

 

2,982

 

3,552

 

596

 

2007

 

Warrensville Heights, OH

 

90,281

 

 

 

525

 

766

 

2,885

 

935

 

3,065

 

4,000

 

1,224

 

1980

 

Westlake, OH

 

62,750

 

 

 

509

 

2,508

 

189

 

508

 

2,309

 

2,817

 

660

 

2005

 

Conshohocken, PA

 

81,470

 

 

 

1,726

 

8,508

 

79

 

1,726

 

8,588

 

10,314

 

345

 

2012

 

Exton, PA

 

57,750

 

 

 

541

 

2,668

 

83

 

541

 

2,751

 

3,292

 

95

 

2012

 

Langhorne, PA

 

65,050

 

 

 

1,019

 

5,023

 

32

 

1,019

 

5,055

 

6,074

 

201

 

2012

 

Levittown, PA

 

76,180

 

 

 

926

 

5,296

 

1,146

 

926

 

5,430

 

6,356

 

1,968

 

2001

 

Malvern, PA

 

 

 

 

2,959

 

18,198

 

 

2,959

 

18,198

 

21,157

 

41

 

2013

 

Montgomeryville, PA

 

84,145

 

 

 

975

 

4,809

 

100

 

975

 

4,908

 

5,883

 

199

 

2012

 

Norristown, PA

 

52,031

 

 

 

777

 

3,709

 

469

 

777

 

4,282

 

5,059

 

223

 

2011

 

Philadelphia, PA

 

97,364

 

 

 

1,461

 

8,334

 

1,615

 

1,461

 

6,771

 

8,232

 

2,557

 

2001

 

Antioch, TN

 

76,190

 

 

 

588

 

4,906

 

247

 

588

 

4,386

 

4,974

 

1,130

 

2005

 

Nashville I, TN

 

103,560

 

 

 

405

 

3,379

 

428

 

405

 

3,229

 

3,634

 

855

 

2005

 

Nashville II, TN

 

83,384

 

 

 

593

 

4,950

 

174

 

593

 

4,434

 

5,027

 

1,162

 

2005

 

Nashville III, TN

 

101,575

 

 

 

416

 

3,469

 

168

 

416

 

3,305

 

3,721

 

842

 

2006

 

Nashville IV, TN

 

102,450

 

 

 

992

 

8,274

 

336

 

992

 

7,370

 

8,362

 

1,871

 

2006

 

Allen, TX

 

62,290

 

3,670

 

714

 

3,519

 

54

 

714

 

3,573

 

4,287

 

159

 

2012

 

Austin I, TX

 

59,520

 

 

 

2,239

 

2,038

 

141

 

2,410

 

1,854

 

4,264

 

483

 

2005

 

Austin II, TX

 

65,151

 

 

(B)

734

 

3,894

 

227

 

738

 

3,559

 

4,297

 

854

 

2006

 

Austin III, TX

 

70,535

 

 

 

1,030

 

5,468

 

186

 

1,035

 

4,995

 

6,030

 

1,134

 

2006

 

Bryan, TX

 

60,450

 

 

 

1,394

 

1,268

 

134

 

1,396

 

1,181

 

2,577

 

317

 

2005

 

Carrollton, TX

 

77,440

 

 

 

661

 

3,261

 

37

 

661

 

3,298

 

3,959

 

105

 

2012

 

College Station, TX

 

26,550

 

 

 

812

 

740

 

113

 

813

 

703

 

1,516

 

181

 

2005

 

Cypress, TX

 

57,711

 

 

 

360

 

1,773

 

32

 

360

 

1,806

 

2,166

 

81

 

2012

 

Dallas I, TX

 

58,582

 

 

 

2,475

 

2,253

 

329

 

2,475

 

2,135

 

4,610

 

540

 

2005

 

Dallas II, TX

 

79,155

 

 

 

940

 

4,635

 

 

940

 

4,635

 

5,575

 

476

 

2013

 

Denton, TX

 

60,846

 

 

 

553

 

2,936

 

194

 

569

 

2,654

 

3,223

 

595

 

2006

 

El Paso I, TX

 

59,852

 

 

(A)

1,983

 

1,805

 

221

 

1,984

 

1,697

 

3,681

 

449

 

2005

 

El Paso II, TX

 

48,704

 

 

(A)

1,319

 

1,201

 

186

 

1,320

 

1,169

 

2,489

 

306

 

2005

 

El Paso III, TX

 

71,152

 

 

(A)

2,408

 

2,192

 

213

 

2,409

 

2,073

 

4,482

 

540

 

2005

 

El Paso IV, TX

 

66,906

 

 

(A)

2,073

 

1,888

 

28

 

2,074

 

1,604

 

3,678

 

505

 

2005

 

El Paso V, TX

 

62,290

 

 

 

1,758

 

1,617

 

141

 

1,761

 

1,498

 

3,259

 

397

 

2005

 

El Paso VI, TX

 

36,620

 

 

 

660

 

607

 

145

 

662

 

618

 

1,280

 

165

 

2005

 

El Paso VII, TX

 

33,945

 

 

 

563

 

517

 

144

 

565

 

550

 

1,115

 

9

 

2005

 

Fort Worth I, TX

 

50,521

 

 

 

1,253

 

1,141

 

180

 

1,253

 

1,087

 

2,340

 

271

 

2005

 

Fort Worth II, TX

 

72,900

 

 

 

868

 

4,607

 

260

 

874

 

4,200

 

5,074

 

1,000

 

2006

 

Frisco I, TX

 

50,754

 

 

 

1,093

 

3,148

 

86

 

1,093

 

2,796

 

3,889

 

722

 

2005

 

Frisco II, TX

 

71,099

 

 

 

1,564

 

4,507

 

92

 

1,564

 

3,988

 

5,552

 

1,034

 

2005

 

Frisco III, TX

 

74,915

 

 

 

1,147

 

6,088

 

232

 

1,154

 

5,515

 

6,669

 

1,310

 

2006

 

Frisco IV, TX

 

75,035

 

 

 

719

 

4,072

 

106

 

719

 

3,620

 

4,339

 

375

 

2010

 

Garland I, TX

 

70,100

 

 

 

751

 

3,984

 

396

 

767

 

3,794

 

4,561

 

884

 

2006

 

Garland II, TX

 

68,425

 

 

 

862

 

4,578

 

198

 

862

 

4,179

 

5,041

 

910

 

2006

 

Houston III, TX

 

60,820

 

 

 

575

 

524

 

283

 

576

 

694

 

1,270

 

189

 

2005

 

Houston IV, TX

 

43,750

 

 

 

960

 

875

 

307

 

961

 

988

 

1,949

 

234

 

2005

 

Houston V, TX

 

126,065

 

 

 

1,153

 

6,122

 

572

 

1,156

 

5,833

 

6,989

 

1,277

 

2006

 

Houston VI, TX

 

54,680

 

 

 

575

 

524

 

5,706

 

983

 

4,909

 

5,892

 

403

 

2011

 

Houston VII, TX

 

47,227

 

 

 

681

 

3,355

 

75

 

681

 

3,430

 

4,111

 

210

 

2012

 

Houston VIII, TX

 

54,213

 

 

 

1,294

 

6,377

 

98

 

1,294

 

6,476

 

7,770

 

290

 

2012

 

Houston IX, TX

 

51,197

 

 

 

296

 

1,459

 

50

 

296

 

1,509

 

1,805

 

67

 

2012

 

Katy, TX

 

71,308

 

 

 

1,329

 

6,552

 

0

 

1,329

 

6,553

 

7,882

 

905

 

2013

 

Keller, TX

 

61,885

 

 

 

890

 

4,727

 

127

 

890

 

4,269

 

5,159

 

1,023

 

2006

 

Lewisville I, TX

 

58,140

 

 

 

476

 

2,525

 

291

 

492

 

2,402

 

2,894

 

546

 

2006

 

Lewisville II, TX

 

127,509

 

 

 

1,464

 

7,217

 

18

 

1,464

 

7,235

 

8,699

 

542

 

2013

 

Mansfield I, TX

 

63,025

 

 

 

837

 

4,443

 

178

 

843

 

4,044

 

4,887

 

951

 

2006

 

Mansfield II, TX

 

57,775

 

 

 

662

 

3,261

 

40

 

662

 

3,300

 

3,962

 

166

 

2012

 

McKinney I, TX

 

47,020

 

 

 

1,632

 

1,486

 

125

 

1,634

 

1,373

 

3,007

 

352

 

2005

 

McKinney II, TX

 

70,050

 

3,839

 

855

 

5,076

 

153

 

857

 

4,604

 

5,461

 

1,095

 

2006

 

North Richland Hills, TX

 

57,200

 

 

 

2,252

 

2,049

 

115

 

2,252

 

1,799

 

4,051

 

464

 

2005

 

Pearland, TX

 

72,060

 

 

 

450

 

2,216

 

47

 

450

 

2,264

 

2,714

 

102

 

2012

 

Roanoke, TX

 

59,420

 

 

 

1,337

 

1,217

 

79

 

1,337

 

1,097

 

2,434

 

285

 

2005

 

Richmond, TX

 

125,275

 

 

 

1,437

 

7,083

 

 

1,437

 

7,083

 

8,520

 

265

 

2013

 

F-49



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost

 

Costs

 

Gross Carrying Amount at
December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Description 

 

Square
Footage

 

Encumbrances

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Subsequent
to
Acquisition

 

Land

 

Buildings
&
Improvements

 

Total

 

Accumulated
Depreciation
(D)

 

Year
Acquired/
Developed

 

San Antonio I, TX

 

73,309

 

 

 

2,895

 

2,635

 

260

 

2,895

 

2,364

 

5,259

 

592

 

2005

 

San Antonio II, TX

 

73,230

 

 

 

1,047

 

5,558

 

142

 

1,052

 

5,007

 

6,059

 

1,095

 

2006

 

San Antonio III, TX

 

71,775

 

 

 

996

 

5,286

 

215

 

996

 

4,780

 

5,776

 

1,014

 

2007

 

Spring, TX

 

72,751

 

 

 

580

 

3,081

 

156

 

580

 

2,789

 

3,369

 

666

 

2006

 

Murray I, UT

 

60,280

 

 

(A)

3,847

 

1,017

 

418

 

3,848

 

1,221

 

5,069

 

324

 

2005

 

Murray II, UT

 

71,221

 

 

(A)

2,147

 

567

 

411

 

2,148

 

819

 

2,967

 

249

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City I, UT

 

56,446

 

 

(A)

2,695

 

712

 

427

 

2,696

 

962

 

3,658

 

240

 

2005

 

Salt Lake City II, UT

 

51,676

 

 

(A)

2,074

 

548

 

355

 

1,931

 

738

 

2,669

 

195

 

2005

 

Alexandria, VA

 

114,650

 

9,418

 

2,812

 

13,865

 

109

 

2,812

 

13,974

 

16,786

 

630

 

2012

 

Burke Lake, VA

 

91,747

 

7,219

 

2,093

 

10,940

 

1,018

 

2,093

 

10,362

 

12,455

 

961

 

2011

 

Fairfax, VA

 

73,650

 

 

 

2,276

 

11,220

 

111

 

2,276

 

11,331

 

13,607

 

449

 

2012

 

Fredericksburg I, VA

 

69,475

 

 

(C)

1,680

 

4,840

 

277

 

1,680

 

4,444

 

6,124

 

1,052

 

2005

 

Fredericksburg II, VA

 

61,207

 

 

(C)

1,757

 

5,062

 

293

 

1,758

 

4,663

 

6,421

 

1,123

 

2005

 

Leesburg, VA

 

85,503

 

4,548

 

1,746

 

9,894

 

68

 

1,746

 

8,674

 

10,420

 

574

 

2011

 

McLearen, VA

 

68,960

 

 

 

1,482

 

8,400

 

143

 

1,482

 

7,388

 

8,870

 

704

 

2010

 

Manassas, VA

 

73,045

 

 

 

860

 

4,872

 

73

 

860

 

4,282

 

5,142

 

431

 

2010

 

Vienna, VA

 

54,698

 

 

 

2,300

 

11,340

 

61

 

2,300

 

11,402

 

13,702

 

456

 

2012

 

Divisional Offices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

168

 

 

168

 

168

 

26

 

 

 

USIFB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,753

 

 

12,752

 

12,752

 

1,247

 

 

 

 

 

24,662,105

 

 

 

444,764

 

1,893,779

 

217,815

 

465,680

 

1,888,823

 

2,354,503

 

379,704

 

 

 

 


Notes (In thousands):

(A)  This facility is part of Yasky Loan portfolio, with a balance of $80,000 as of December 31, 2010.

(B)  This facility is part of the YSI 20 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $62,459$56,373 as of December 31, 2010.2013.

(C)  This facility is part of the YSI 6 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $76,137 as of December 31, 2010.

(D)  This facility is part of the YSI 28 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $1555 as of December 31, 2010.

(E)  This facility is part of the YSI 30 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $7,316 as of December 31, 2010.

(F) This facility is part of the YSI 34 Loan protfolio, with a balance of $14,823 as of December 31, 2010

(G)  This facility is part of the YSI 31 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $13,660 as of December 31, 2010.

(H)  This facility is part of the YSI 32 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $6,058 as of December 31, 2010.

(I)(B)  This facility is part of the YSI 33 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $11,370$10,688 as of December 31, 2010.2013.

(J)(C)  This facility is part of the YSI 35 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $4,499$4,274 as of December 31, 2010.2013.

(K)  This facility is part of the YSI 41 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $3,879 as of December 31, 2010.

(L)  This facility is part of the YSI 38 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $3,973 as of December 31, 2010.

(M)  This facility is part of the YSI 48 Loan portfolio, with a balance of $25,270 as of December 31, 2010.

(N)(D)  Depreciation on the buildings and improvements is recorded on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from five to 39 years.

(O)  This facility is part

F-50



Table of the USILP secured credit facility portfolio, with a balance of $243,000 as of December 31, 2010.Contents

 

Activity in real estate facilities during 2010, 2009,2013, 2012, and 20082011 was as follows (in thousands):

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Storage facilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Storage facilities*

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

1,774,542

 

$

1,888,123

 

$

1,916,396

 

 

$

2,443,022

 

$

2,107,469

 

Acquisitions & improvements

 

96,612

 

13,345

 

30,295

 

 

219,751

 

335,644

 

Fully depreciated assets

 

(79,211

)

(40,859

)

 

 

(14,398

)

(25,415

)

Real estate venture

 

 

93,679

 

Dispositions and other

 

(49,865

)

(89,668

)

(59,168

)

 

(127,700

)

(71,265

)

Contstruction in progress

 

943

 

3,601

 

600

 

Construction in progress

 

33,031

 

2,910

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

1,743,021

 

$

1,774,542

 

$

1,888,123

 

 

$

2,553,706

 

$

2,443,022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation*

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

344,009

 

$

328,165

 

$

269,278

 

 

$

353,315

 

$

318,749

 

Depreciation expense

 

64,387

 

73,569

 

77,580

 

 

87,708

 

79,955

 

Fully depreciated assets

 

(79,211

)

(40,503

)

 

 

(14,398

)

(25,415

)

Dispositions and other

 

(14,655

)

(17,222

)

(18,693

)

 

(28,089

)

(19,974

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

314,530

 

$

344,009

 

$

328,165

 

 

$

398,536

 

$

353,315

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Storage facility assets

 

$

1,428,491

 

$

1,430,533

 

$

1,559,958

 

Storage facilities, net

 

$

2,155,170

 

$

2,089,707

 


* These amounts include equipment that is housed at the Company’s storage facilities.

 

F-35F-51