Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
| ||
| (Mark One) | ||
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
OR
| ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROMTO. | |
Commission file number: 001-33807 | ||
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission file number: 001-33807
EchoStar Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Nevada | 26-1232727 | |
| (State or | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
| 80112-5308 | |
|
| |
(Address of | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 706-4000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(303) 706-4000 | |||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: | |||
Title of each class |
|
| |
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value | The | ||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: | None | ||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ýx No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ýx
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ýx No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ýxNo o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sregistrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”" "accelerated filer" and “smaller"smaller reporting company”company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | |||||
Non-accelerated filer o |
| |||||
(Do not check if a smaller | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ýx
As of June 30, 2011,28, 2013, the aggregate market value of Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1.404$1.63 billion based upon the closing price of the Class A common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market as of the close of business on that date.
As of February 14, 2012,13, 2014, the registrant’sregistrant's outstanding common stock consisted of 38,982,80242,855,812 shares of Class A common stock and 47,687,039 shares of Class B common stock, each $0.001 par value.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents are incorporated into this Form 10-K by reference:
Portions of the registrant’sregistrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements | i | ||||
PART I | |||||
Item 1. | Business | 1 | |||
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 20 | |||
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 37 | |||
Item 2. | Properties | 38 | |||
Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 38 | |||
Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 44 | |||
PART II | |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
| |||||
45 | |||||
|
| ||||
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures |
| ||||
| |||||
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 79 | ||||
Item 9A. |
| 79 | |||
Item 9B. | Other Information | 80 | |||
PART III | |||||
Item |
| ||||
| |||||
82 | |||||
| |||||
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
| ||||
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
| ||||
| 82 | |||||
| |||||
83 | |||||
Signatures | 90 | ||||
| |||||
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKINGFORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make “forward-looking statements”"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 throughout this report. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect”"believe," "intend," "plan," "estimate," "project," "expect" or “anticipate” will occur"anticipate" and other similar statements), you must remember that such statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations, estimates, and assumptions and that our expectations, estimates and assumptions may not be achieved, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that any future transactions or events described herein will happen as described or that they will happen at all. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.those expressed in, or implied, or projected by the forward-looking statements and information. Whether actual events or results will conform withto our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties.uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond our control.
For further discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
General Risks Affecting Our Business
·
·
·If we are unable to properly respond to technological changes, our business could be significantly harmed.
·Certain of our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice, which would have a detrimental effect on us.
·We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions.
·We may experience significant financial losses on our existing investments.
·We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our business, which may not be successful and we may lose up to the entire value of our investment in these acquisitions and transactions.
·We may not be aware of certain foreign government laws or regulations or changes to them which could have a significant adverse impact on our business.
·Our international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations.
·Our business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others. The loss of or infringement of our intellectual property rights could have a significant adverse impact on our business.
·Any failure or inadequacy of our information technology infrastructure or those of our third-party service providers could harm our business.
·We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.
·We have not been an independent company for a significant amount of time and we may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to operate as an independent company.
·We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.
·We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt.
Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Technologies Segment
·We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for a substantial portion of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
·Our business may suffer if our customer base does not compete successfully with existing and emerging competition.
·Our future financial performance depends in part on our ability to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes.
·Component pricing may remain stable or be negatively affected by inflation, increased demand, decreased supply, or other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
·
·Our ability to sell our digital set-top boxes to other operators depends on our ability to obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems utilized by these other operators.
·Growth in our EchoStar Technologies segment likely requires expansion of our sales to international customers, and we may be unsuccessful in expanding international sales.
·If we are successful in growing sales of our digital set-top boxes to international customers, we may be subject to additional risks including, among other things, trade barriers and political instability abroad.
·The digital set-top box industry is extremely competitive.
·We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants, principally located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes.
·Our digital set-top boxes are highly complex and may experience quality or supply problems.
·
·
·Our future growth depends on growing demand for advanced technologies.
·If the encryption and related security technology used in our digital set-top boxes is compromised, sales of our digital set-top boxes may decline.
Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, and Hughes Segments
·We currently face competition from established competitors in the satellite service business and may face competition from others in the future.
·Our owned and leased satellites in orbit are subject to significant operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
·Our satellites have minimum design lives ranging from 12 to 15 years, but could fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.
·Our satellites under construction are subject to risks related to construction and launch that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
·Our business is subject to risksresults of adverse government regulation.
·Our business depends on Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses that can expire or be revoked or modified and applications for FCC licenses that may not be granted.
·Our use of certain satellites is often dependent on satellite coordination agreements, whichoperations may be difficultmaterially adversely affected if we are not able to obtain.lease this capacity to third parties, including DISH Network.
·
·We generally do not have commercial insurance coverage on the satellites we use and could face significant impairment charges if one of our uninsured satellites fails.
·The enterprise network communications industry is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against other terrestrial and satellite-based network providers in our enterprise groups.
·The consumer network communications market is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against fiber, Digital Subscriber Line (“DSL”), cable service providers and other satellite broadband providers in the consumer market.
·
·
i
Risks Related to Our Satellites
Risks Related to Our Products and Technology
·
·
Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Business
ii
·Our foreign operations expose us to regulatory risks and restrictions not present in our domestic operations.
·Although we expect that the Hughes Acquisition (as defined below) will benefit us, those expected benefits may not occur because of the complexity of integration and other challenges.
Other Risks
·We cannot assure you that there will not be deficiencies leading to material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.
·
·We are controlled by one principal stockholder who is our Chairman.
·
All cautionary statements made herein should be read as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Investors should consider the risks and uncertainties described herein and should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We assume no responsibility for updating forward-looking information contained or incorporated by reference herein or in other reports we file with the SEC.
In this report, the words “EchoStar,”"EchoStar," the “Company,” “we,” “our”"Company," "we," "our" and “us”"us" refer to EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. “DISH Network”"DISH Network" refers to DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
iii
OVERVIEW
We wereEchoStar Corporation (together with its subsidiaries is referred to as "EchoStar," the "Company," "we," "us" and/or "our") is a holding company that was organized in October 2007 as a corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada. In 2008, DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries ("DISH Network") completed its distribution to us of its digital set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of their satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate, and other assets and related liabilities to us (the "Spin-off"). Since the Spin-off, EchoStar and DISH Network have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and as of December 31, 2013, neither entity has any ownership interest in the other (See Note 20 of this report for a discussion of our subsequent events). However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is beneficially owned by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. Our Class A common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol “SATS.” Our principal executive offices"SATS." We are located at 100 Inverness Terrace East, Englewood, Colorado 80112-5308a global provider of satellite operations, video delivery solutions, digital set-top boxes, and our telephone number is (303) 706-4000. EchoStar Corporation is a holding company, whose subsidiaries (which together with EchoStar Corporation are referred to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”)broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments.
We currently operate in three segments:business segments.
·
·Hughes — which provides satellite broadband Internet access to North American consumers and broadband network services and systems to the domestic and international enterprise markets. HughesOur operations also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems. Hughes became a new segment as a result of our acquisition (the “Hughes Acquisition”) of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hughes Communications”) and the results of operations of Hughes Communications are included in this report effective June 9, 2011. See Note 13 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the Hughes Acquisition.
Effective January 1, 2008, DISH Network completed its distribution to us (the “Spin-off”) of its digital set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of its satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets,include real estate and other assetsactivities that have not been assigned to our operating segments, costs incurred in business development activities, expenses of various corporate departments, and our centralized treasury activities, including income from our investment portfolio and interest expense on our debt.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
Capitalize on demand for broadband services. We intend to capitalize on the demand for satellite-delivered broadband services and enterprise solutions by utilizing, among other things, our industry expertise, technology leadership, satellite capacity, and high-quality, reliable service to continue growth in consumer subscribers and the enterprise market.
Expand satellite capacity and related liabilities. Since the Spin-off, we and DISH Network have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and neither entity has any ownership interestinfrastructure. Our expertise in the other. However,identification, acquisition and development of satellite spectrum rights and satellite operations, together with existing or acquired infrastructure will provide opportunities to cross sell services, bundle satellite broadband and video services, and explore opportunities in new markets. We believe market opportunities exist that will facilitate the acquisition or leasing of satellite capacity which will enable us to provide services to a substantial majoritybroader customer base, including providers of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.pay-TV services, satellite-delivered broadband, corporate communications, and government services.
BUSINESS STRATEGIES
Expand our digital set-top box business to additional customersExploit international opportunities.. We believe that direct-to-home ("DTH") satellite and broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure. We intend to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities existthat allow us to expand our business by selling equipment and services in both the U.S. and international markets. As a result ofcapitalize on our extensive experience within delivering end-to-end broadband and pay-TV consumer services.
Expand our set-top box and customer premise equipment sales. With our extensive experience in designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing digital set-top boxes and related products, we believe we can leverage the broader adoption of advanced technologies within set-top boxessuch as whole home DVR, placeshifting for TVAnywhere, hybrid internet offerings and other in-home solutions to create opportunities for us. In particular, the broader adoption of advanced technologies within set-top boxes may launch a replacement cycle, particularly among direct-to-home (“DTH”) satellite and cable providers with substantial bases of legacy equipment.
Leverage satellite capacity and related infrastructure. We currently have available satellite and fiber capacity. We believe market opportunities exist to lease our capacity to a broader customer base, including providers of pay-TV services, satellite-delivered broadband, corporate communications and government services. We willTherefore, we continue to assess the ability to cross sell services, bundle satellite broadband and video DTH services, and explore opportunities, inincluding partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisitions, to expand our existing markets or enter new markets.
Offer end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems. We In addition, we intend to leverageseek opportunities to license our engineering resourcestechnology to customize infrastructure solutions for a broad base of customers. For example, as demonstrated by our Dish Mexico joint venture, we are offering customers end-to-endother original equipment manufacturers or pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and network design and management.providers.
Capitalize on demand for broadband services. We intend to capitalize on the increasing demand for satellite-delivered broadband services and enterprise solutions by utilizing, among other things, our industry expertise, technology leadership and high-quality, reliable service to continue subscriber growth in the consumer and enterprise markets.
Develop improved technologiestechnologies.. The engineering capabilities of our combined engineering power of EchoStar and Hughes Communications will allowbusiness units provides us with the opportunity to develop and deploy cutting edge technologytechnologies, license our technologies to others, and maintain a leading technological position in our industry.the industries in which we are active.
Exploit international opportunities. We believe that DTH satellite and broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure, and we intend to continue to seek new investments and customer relationships with international DTH satellite service and broadband service providers. Our available satellite capacity provides us, in certain cases, with the ability to initiate new services quickly, which could give us a competitive advantage.BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Pursue strategic partnerships, joint ventures and acquisitions. We intend to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities, both domestically and internationally, that we believe may allow us to increase our existing market share, expand into new markets, broaden our portfolio of products and intellectual property, and strengthen our relationships with our customers.
ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES SEGMENT
Our Products
Digital Set-Top Boxes. Our EchoStar Technologies segment offers a wide range of digital set-top boxes that allow consumers to watch and control their television programming and contain a variety of other capabilities and functionality. Our current digital set-top boxes include:
·High-definition (“HD”) digital set-top boxes:These devices allow consumers who subscribe to television services from multi-channel video distributors to accessthe enhanced picture quality and sound of high-definition content, in addition to the SD functionality of our SD digital set-top boxes.
Certain models of our SDHD digital set-top boxes and HDSD digital set-top boxes also contain certain of the following advanced capabilities and functionalities:
·
·
In addition to digital set-top boxes, we also design and develop related products such as satellite dishes and remote controls, and broadband Internet connectivity devices.
controls.
Digital Broadcast Operations. We operate a number of digital broadcast centers in the U.S. Our principal digital broadcast centers are located in Cheyenne, Wyoming and Gilbert, Arizona. We also have fourmultiple regional digital broadcast centers and four micro digital broadcast centers that allow us to maximize the use of the spot beam capabilities of our satellites and our customers’customers' satellites. Programming and other data isare received at these centers by fiber optic cable or satellite. ItThe data is then processed, compressed, and encrypted and then uplinked to our satellites and our customers’customers' satellites for transmission to end users.end-users.
Our Customers
Historically, the primary customer of our EchoStar Technologies segment has been DISH Network. DISH Network accounted for 79.4%90.1%, 82.8%76.9% and 81.9%79.4% of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, respectively. Bell TV, a DTH satellite service provider in Canada, accounted for 12.3%4.5%, 9.8%13.4% and 11.7%12.3% of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009, respectively. Furthermore, Dish Mexico accounted for 4.0%, 3.9% and 2.1% of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We also currently sell our digital set-top boxes to other international DTH satellite and cable providers, such as Unitymedia GmbH, although these customers do not account for a significant amount of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue.
including Dish Mexico.
We expect toDISH Network will continue to rely on DISH Network asbe the primary customer ofand the key revenue contributor for our EchoStar Technologies segment and for the substantial majority of our total EchoStar Technologies segment revenue.segment. Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a new receiver agreement, expiring on December 31, 2014, with DISH Network pursuant to which we are obligated to sell digital set-top boxes and related products to DISH Network until December 31, 2014. However, DISH Network is under nohas the right, but not the obligation, to purchase our digital set-top boxes or related products before or after this date. The receiver agreement allows DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from us either: (i) at a cost (decreasing as we reduce costcosts and increasing as our costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased. Under the receiver agreement, our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be impairedreduced if these costs increase.
A substantial majority of our EchoStar Technologies segmentsegment's international revenue during each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010,2013, 2012 and 20092011 was attributable to sales of digital set-top boxes to Bell TV and Dish Mexico.TV. In early 2009,2012, we completed a multi-year contract extensionamended our Pricing Agreement with Bell TV, that makeswhich extended our exclusivity rights until December 31, 2013. Among other things, the Pricing Agreement, as amended, entitles us theto be Bell TV's exclusive provider of digital set-top boxes, to Bell TV, subject to certain limited exceptions. The agreement includesexceptions, and provides fixed pricing over the term of the agreement as well as providing future engineering development for enhanced Bell TV service offerings. Additionally, in 2008,In January 2014, we entered into a joint venture with Dish Mexico, toamended the Pricing Agreement, which we also sell digital set-top boxes and related accessories and uplink services to Dish Mexico.extended our exclusivity rights under the Pricing Agreement until February 28, 2014.
Our Competition
The set-top box industry is highly competitive, and market leadership changes frequently as a result of new products, designs and pricing. As we seek to establish ourselvesgrow our revenue and market share in the digital set-top box industry, as an independent business, we face substantial competition. Many of our primary competitors, such as Motorola Mobility,Arris Group, Inc. ("Arris"), Cisco (which owns Scientific Atlanta)Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), Pace Micro Technology Plc. ("PACE"), Samsung, and Technicolor S.A. ("Technicolor"), have established longstanding relationships with their customers. Although some of the competitors own the conditional access technology deployed by their customers, the FCC’s rules regarding separate mandated removable security in digital cable systems may allow us to compete for this type of business. In addition, wea number of rapidly growing companies have recently entered the market with set-top box
offerings similar to our existing satellite set-top box products. The entry of these new competitors may result in increased pricing pressure in the market. We may also face competition from international developers of digital set-top box systems that may be able to develop and manufacture products and services at costs that are substantially lower than ours. Our ability to compete in the digital set-top box industry will alsoFurthermore, we depend heavily on our ability to successfully bring advanced technologies, including Internetinternet delivery of video content and our Slingbox placeshifting technology, to market to keep pace with our competitors.
Our use of proprietary technology, together with our in-house engineering expertise, enables us to innovate and bring new features and enhancements quickly to our primary customers. In addition, our end-to-end video solution allows us to provide a more cost-effective solution for a pay-TV operator who may have to negotiate hardware, middleware and a conditional access system separately. We have a long-standing relationship with DISH Network and provide to them technologically advanced set-top boxes, including advanced hybrid satellite and internet protocol over-the-top delivery solutions, Slingbox placeshifting technology, and whole-home DVR functionality.
Our Manufacturers
Although we design, engineer and distribute digital set-top boxes and related products, we are not directly engaged in the manufacturing process. Rather, we outsource the manufacturing of our digital set-top boxes and related products to third parties who manufacture our products according to specifications supplied by us. We depend on a
few manufacturers, and in some cases a single manufacturer, for the production of digital set-top boxes and related products. Although there can be no assurance, we do not believe that the loss of any single manufacturer or supplier would materially impact our business. Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Shanghai DD&TT Electronic Enterprise Co., LTD and Jabil Circuit, Inc. currently manufacture the majority of our digital set-top boxes.
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE SERVICES SEGMENT
EchoStar Satellite Services has five ownedboxes and five leased in-orbit satellites. EchoStar Satellite Services also has one owned satellite currently under construction.
Our transponder capacity is currently used by our customers for a variety of applications:
accessories.
·DTH Services.HUGHES SEGMENT We provide satellite transponder capacity to satellite TV providers, broadcasters and programmers who use our satellites to deliver programming. Our satellites are also used for the transmission of live sporting events, Internet access, disaster recovery, and satellite news gathering services.
·Government Services. We provide satellite services and technical services to U.S. government service providers and directly to some state agencies. We believe the U.S. government may increase its use of commercial satellites for homeland security, emergency response, continuing education, distance learning, and training.
·Network Services. We provide satellite transponder capacity and provide terrestrial network services to corporations. These networks are dedicated private networks that allow delivery of video and data services for corporate communications. Our satellites can be used for point-to-point or point to multi-point communications.
Our Customers
We provide transponder capacity on our satellite fleet primarily to DISH Network, but also to a small number of U.S. government service providers, state agencies, Internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers. Currently, due to our limited customer base, we have unused satellite capacity. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, DISH Network accounted for approximately 77.6%, 79.5% and 75.4% of our total EchoStar Satellite Services segment revenue. We have entered into certain commercial agreements with DISH Network pursuant to which we are obligated to provide DISH Network with satellite services at fixed prices for varying lengths of time depending on the satellite. See “Related Party Transactions with DISH Network — Satellite Capacity Agreements” in Note 17 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. While we expect to continue to provide satellite services to DISH Network, its satellite capacity requirements may change for a variety of reasons, including its ability to construct and launch its own satellites. Any termination or reduction in the services we provide to DISH Network may cause us to have excess capacity on our satellites and require that we aggressively pursue alternative sources of revenue for this business. Our other satellite service sales are generally characterized by shorter-term contracts or spot market sales. Future costs associated with our excess capacity will negatively impact our margins if we do not generate revenue to offset these costs.
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to satellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.285 billion and $1.054 billion, respectively, and contracted backlog attributable to satellites under construction of $621 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. Of these amounts, we expect approximately $230 million to be recognized in 2012.
Our Competition
Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment competes against larger, well-established satellite service companies, such as Intelsat, SES S.A. and Telesat, in an industry that is characterized by long-term contracts and high costs for customers to change service providers. Therefore, it will be difficult to displace customers from their current relationships with our competitors. Intelsat and SES S.A. maintain key North American orbital slots that may
further limit competition and competitive pricing. In addition, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment could face significant competition from suppliers of terrestrial communications capacity.
While we believe that there may be opportunities to capture new business as a result of market trends such as the increased communications demands of homeland security initiatives, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.
HUGHES SEGMENT
On June 8, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding equity of Hughes Communications, Inc., pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger (the “Hughes Agreement”) by and between us, certain of our subsidiaries, including EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., and Hughes Communications, Inc. The funding of the Hughes Acquisition was supported by the issuance of $1.1 billion of senior secured notes and $900 million of senior unsecured notes. In addition to the debt securities issued, we contributed cash and marketable investment securities to, and forgave certain net intercompany accounts payable of, Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSS”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, formerly known as EH Holding Corporation, totaling $609 million.
Our Products and Services
Our Hughes segment providesuses its two owned satellites, SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII, and additional satellite capacity acquired from multiple third-party providers, to provide satellite broadband Internetinternet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the consumer market, and broadband network services and systemsequipment to the domestic and international enterprise markets. Our Hughes segment also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems. We incorporate advances in technology to reduce costs and to increase the functionality and reliability of our products and services. Through the usage of advanced spectrally efficient modulation and coding methodologies, such as DVB-S2 and proprietary software web acceleration and compression techniques, we continue to improve the efficiency of our networks. In addition, weWe invest in technologies to enhance our system and network management capabilities, specifically our managed services for enterprises. We also continue to invest in next generation technologies that can be applied to our future products and services. Beginning in October 2012, we introduced HughesNet Gen4 broadband internet services to our customers in North America on EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012. In October 2012, we entered into a distribution agreement (the "Distribution Agreement") with dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. ("dishNET"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, pursuant to which dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute the Hughes satellite internet service (the "Hughes service") under the dishNET brand. See Note 19 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion of our related party transactions with DISH Network.
Our Customers
Our Hughes segment delivers broadband internet service to North American consumers. It also provides satellite, network products and services and managed network services and equipment to
enterprises and broadband service providers worldwide. In addition, our Hughes segment provides satellite ground segment systems and terminals to mobile system operators.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Hughes segment had approximately 860,000 and 636,000 broadband subscribers, respectively, of which 635,000 and 588,000 were residential retail subscribers, respectively. These broadband subscribers include customers that subscribe to our HughesNet broadband services, through retail, wholesale and small/medium enterprise service channels.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Hughes segment had approximately $1.15 billion and $1.06 billion, respectively, of contracted revenue backlog. We define Hughes revenue backlog as our expected future revenue under customer contracts that are non-cancelable, excluding agreements with customers in our consumer market. Of the total contracted revenue backlog as of December 31, 2013, we expect to recognize approximately $383.1 million of revenue in 2014.
Our Competition
The network communications industry is highly competitive. As a global provider of data network products and services, our Hughes segment competes with a large number of telecommunications service providers. This increasingly competitive environment has put pressure on prices and margins. To compete effectively, we emphasize, among other things, our network quality, our customization capability, our offering of networks as a turnkey managed service, our position as a single point of contact for products and services and our competitive prices.
In our consumer market, we compete against traditional telecommunications and wireless carriers, as well as digital subscriber line ("DSL") and cable internet service providers offering competitive services in many communities we seek to serve. Cost, speed and accessibility are key determining factors in the election of a service provider by the consumer. Our primary satellite competitor in our North American consumer market is ViaSat Communications, Inc. ("ViaSat Communications"), which is owned by ViaSat, Inc. ("ViaSat"). In addition, we face competition against established domestic carriers such as AT&T Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and Sprint Corporation and multiple cable operators. We seek to differentiate ourselves based on the ubiquitous availability of our service, quality, proprietary technology, and distribution channels.
In our enterprise market, our principal competitors for the supply of very-small-aperture terminal ("VSAT") satellite networks are Gilat, ViaSat, SageNet LLC, Newtec and iDirect Technologies ("iDirect"). To differentiate ourselves from our competitors, among other things, we emphasize particular technological features of our products and services, our ability to customize networks and perform desired development work and the quality of our customer service. We also face competition from resellers and numerous local companies who purchase equipment and sell services to local customers, including domestic and international telecom operators, cable companies and other major carriers.
Our broadband networks generally have an advantage over terrestrial networks where the network must reach many locations over large distances, where the customer has a "last mile" or a congestion problem that cannot be solved easily with terrestrial facilities and where there is a need for transmission to remote locations or emerging markets. By comparison, ground-based facilities (e.g., fiber optic cables) often have an advantage for carrying large amounts of bulk traffic between a small number of fixed locations.
With SPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVII and additional satellite capacity acquired from multiple third-party providers, we believe that we will have sufficient capacity to grow our consumer broadband business in 2014. However, faster subscriber growth rates than anticipated or increases in subscriber consumption of capacity beyond our current expectations could force us to modify our marketing and business plans in some of our coverage regions. Our relative competitive position is constantly changing as we and our competitors strive to improve our respective positions. While our current competitive position provides
us the opportunity to grow our business, we cannot be certain of its continuing effects on our business as our competitors modify or adapt their strategies and service offerings.
Manufacturing
TheCertain products in our Hughes segment are designed, assembled and tested primarily at our facilities in Maryland and we outsource a significant portion of the manufacturing of our products to third parties. We believe that the manufacturing facilities used by our Hughes segment have sufficient capacity to handle current demand. We adjust our capacity based on our production requirements. We also work with third-party vendors for the development and manufacture of components that are integrated into our products. We develop dual sourcing capabilities for critical parts when practical and we evaluate outsourced subcontract vendors on a periodic basis. Our operations group, together with our research and developmentengineering group, works with our vendors and subcontractors to reduce development costs, and to increase production efficiency, in orderand to obtain components at lower prices.
ECHOSTAR SATELLITE SERVICES SEGMENT
Our Services
Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment operates its business using ten of its owned and leased in-orbit satellites, including the EchoStar XVI satellite launched in November 2012. We lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, U.S. government service providers, state agencies, internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers. In January 2013, we began to lease EchoStar XVI to DISH Network for the delivery of DTH broadcast services to DISH Network customers in the U.S. Our satellite capacity is currently used by our customers for a variety of applications:
Our Customers
Our HughesWe provide satellite capacity on our satellite fleet primarily to DISH Network, but also to a small number of U.S. government service providers, state agencies, internet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers. Currently, due to our limited customer base, we have unused satellite capacity. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, DISH Network accounted for approximately 74.9%, 72.4% and 77.6% of our total EchoStar Satellite Services segment delivers broadband Internet servicerevenue. We have entered into certain commercial agreements with DISH Network pursuant to North American consumers. It also provideswhich we are obligated to provide DISH Network with satellite wire line and wireless communication network products andservices at fixed prices for varying lengths of time depending on the satellite. See Note 19 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion. While we expect to continue to provide satellite services to enterprisesDISH Network, its satellite capacity requirements may change for a variety of reasons, including its ability to construct and launch its own satellites. Any termination or reduction in North America and managed networks services and equipment to enterprises and broadband service providers worldwide. In addition, our Hughes segment provides turnkey satellite ground segment systems to mobile system operators and point-to-multipoint microwave radio network systems that are used for cellular backhaul and broadband wireless access.
As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 626,000 customers that subscribe to our consumer and small/medium enterprise service. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, our Hughes segment had total revenue backlog, which we define as our expected future revenue under customer contracts that are non-cancelable and excluding agreements with our customers in our consumer market, of approximately $1.036 billion. Of this amount, we expect approximately $370 million to be recognized in 2012.
Our Competition
The network communications industry is highly competitive. As a provider of data network products andthe services in the U.S. and internationally, our Hughes segment competes with a large number of telecommunications service providers. This increasingly competitive environment has put pressure on prices and margins. To compete effectively, we emphasize, among other things, our network quality, our customization capability, our offering of networks as a turnkey managed service (rather than as an equipment sale), our position as a single point of contact for products and services and our competitive prices.
In our consumer market, we compete against traditional telecommunications and wireless carriers, as well as DSL and cable Internet service providers offering competing services in many communities we seekprovide to serve. Cost, speed and accessibility are key determining factors in the election of a service provider by the consumer. Our primary satellite competitor in our consumer market is ViaSat Communications, Inc. (formerly known as WildBlue Communications, Inc., “ViaSat Communications”), which is owned by ViaSat, Inc. (“ViaSat”). To a lesser extent, we also compete with smaller satellite operators such as Spacenet, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (“Gilat”). We seekDISH Network may cause us to differentiate ourselves basedhave excess capacity on our service quality, proprietary technology,satellites and our distribution channels. We also face competition from established carriers such as AT&T Corp., Verizon, Sprint Corporation, British Telecommunications plc, France Télécom, Deutsche Telekom AG and the global consortia of telecom operators and other major carriers, which provide international telephone, private line and private network services using their own national telephone networks and those of others.
In our enterprise market, our principal competitors for the supply of very-small-aperture terminals (“VSATs”) satellite networks are Gilat, ViaSat and iDirect Technologies (“iDirect”). Unlike Gilat, which offers a full line of broadband products and services for enterprise customers, ViaSat and iDirect offer enterprises only broadband products. In competing with Gilat, ViaSat and iDirect, we emphasize particular technological features of our products and services, our ability to customize networks and perform desired development work, the quality of our customer service and our willingness to be flexible in structuring arrangements for the customer. Our Hughes segment also faces competition from resellers and numerous local companies who purchase equipment and sell services to local customers.
Our broadband networks generally have an advantage over terrestrial networks where the network must reach many locations over large distances, where the customer has a “last mile” or a congestion problem that cannot be solved easily with terrestrial facilities and where there is a need for transmission to remote locations or emerging markets. By comparison, ground-based facilities (e.g., fiber optic cables) often have an advantage for carrying large amounts of bulk traffic between a small number of fixed locations.
We currently utilize our SPACEWAY 3 satellite to operate our broadband business. We believerequire that we will have sufficient capacityaggressively pursue alternative sources of revenue for this business. Our other satellite service sales generally are characterized by shorter-term contracts or spot market sales.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to grow our broadband businesssatellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.14 billion and that our capacity will grow significantly when we launch EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, formerly known as Jupiter, our next generation, high throughput geostationary satellite, in$1.44 billion, respectively. Of the summer of 2012.
However, faster subscriber growth rates than anticipated or increases in subscriber consumption of capacity beyond our current expectations could force us to modify our marketing and business plans in some of our coverage regions prior to the launch of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. Our relative competitive position is constantly changing as we and our competitors strive to improve our respective positions. While our current competitive position provides us the opportunity to grow our business, we cannot be certain of its continuing effects on our business as our competitors modify or adapt their strategies and service offerings.
INTERNATIONAL DTH PLATFORMS
Our experience with digital set-top boxes and satellite delivery systems enables us to provide end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and related components, and network design and management.
During 2008, we entered into our Dish Mexico joint venture. Pursuant to this arrangement, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to Dish Mexico. Subject to a number of conditions, we committed to provide $112 million of value over an initial ten year period in the form of cash, equipment and services, which was satisfiedtotal contracted revenue backlog as of December 31, 2010.2013, we expect to recognize approximately $242.5 million of revenue in 2014.
Our Competition
Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment competes against larger, well-established satellite service companies, such as Intelsat S.A. ("Intelsat"), SES S.A. ("SES"), Telesat Canada ("Telesat"), and Eutelsat Communications S.A. ("Eutelsat"), in an industry that is characterized by long-term contracts and high costs for customers to change service providers. Therefore, it will be difficult to displace customers from their current relationships with our competitors. Intelsat and SES maintain key North American orbital slots that may further limit competition and competitive pricing.
While we believe that there may be opportunities to capture new business as a result of market trends such as the increased communications demands of homeland security initiatives, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.
OTHER BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
We intendare exploring opportunities to evaluateselectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic development/acquisition opportunities, domestically and internationally. We believe that investments in these types of opportunities, may allow us to increase our existing market share, expand into new strategic development opportunities in North America and in other international markets. We also plan to expand our business andmarkets, support the development of new satellite-delivered services, such as broadband Internetinternet connectivity and mobile video services.services, broaden our portfolio of products and intellectual property, and strengthen our relationships with our customers. With our extensive experience in designing, developing, and distributing digital set-top boxes and broadband related products, we can leverage the broader adoption of advanced technologies to create opportunities for us. We believe that DTH and satellite broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure, and we intend to continue to seek new investments and customer relationships with international DTH service and satellite broadband service providers.
In 2012, we acquired the right to use various frequencies at the 45 degree west longitude orbital location ("Brazilian Authorization") from ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory agency. The expertiseBrazilian Authorization is intended for use in providing pay-TV services in Brazil. In September 2013, we obtain through these strategic opportunities may also help us to improve and expand the servicesannounced that we were in discussions with GVT, a subsidiary of Vivendi S.A., to form a joint venture to provide pay-TV services in Brazil with the objective to offer a national service using IPTV and satellite distribution. In December 2013, we ceased our discussions with GVT, but we remain committed to delivering a unique pay-TV service to Brazil via a high-powered Broadcast Satellite Service ("BSS") satellite.
In December 2013, we acquired 100.0% of Solaris Mobile, which is based in Dublin, Ireland and licensed by the European Union ("EU") and individual EU Member States to provide mobile satellite services and complementary ground component services covering the entire EU using S-band spectrum. We believe we are well-positioned to commercialize this license due to our existing customers.access to the TerreStar-2 S-band satellite as well as the mobile satellite systems technology expertise of our Hughes segment. In December 2013, we amended the T2 Development Agreement with DISH Network to provide for the ability to purchase of the TerreStar-2 satellite, which is designed to provide mobile services using S-band frequencies. Through the acquisition of Solaris Mobile and the S-band spectrum and our
expertise in developing mobile satellite infrastructures, we expect to accelerate advanced mobile services throughout the EU.
OUR SATELLITE FLEET
Our satellite fleet consists of both owned and leased satellites detailed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
| Original |
|
|
|
|
| Degree Orbital |
| Useful Life/ |
|
|
| Launch |
| Location |
| Lease Term |
|
Satellites |
| Date |
| (West Longitude) |
| (In Years) |
|
Owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar III (1) (2) |
| October 1997 |
| 61.5 |
| 12 |
|
EchoStar VI (1) |
| July 2000 |
| 77 |
| 12 |
|
EchoStar VIII (1) |
| August 2002 |
| 77 |
| 12 |
|
EchoStar IX (1) |
| August 2003 |
| 121 |
| 12 |
|
EchoStar XII (1) |
| July 2003 |
| 61.5 |
| 10 |
|
SPACEWAY 3 (4) |
| August 2007 |
| 95 |
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased from DISH Network: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar I (1) |
| December 1995 |
| 77 |
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased from Other Third Parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMC-15 (3) |
| December 2004 |
| 105 |
| 10 |
|
AMC-16 (3) |
| January 2005 |
| 85 |
| 10 |
|
Nimiq 5 (1) (3) |
| September 2009 |
| 72.7 |
| 15 |
|
QuetzSat-1 (1) (3) |
| September 2011 |
| 67.1 |
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Construction (owned) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EchoStar XVI (1) |
| Expected in 2012 |
| 61.5 |
| 15 |
|
EchoStar XVII/Jupiter |
| Expected in 2012 |
| 107 |
| 15 |
|
CMBStar |
| Construction Suspended |
|
|
|
|
|
Satellites | Segment | Launch Date | Nominal Degree Orbital Location (West Longitude) | Depreciable Life (In Years) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Owned: | ||||||||||||
SPACEWAY 3(4) | Hughes | August 2007 | 95 | 12 | ||||||||
EchoStar XVII | Hughes | July 2012 | 107 | 15 | ||||||||
EchoStar III(1)(2) | ESS | October 1997 | 61.5 | 12 | ||||||||
EchoStar VI | ESS | July 2000 | 96.2 | 12 | ||||||||
EchoStar VIII(1) | ESS | August 2002 | 77 | 12 | ||||||||
EchoStar IX(1) | ESS | August 2003 | 121 | 12 | ||||||||
EchoStar XII(1)(5) | ESS | July 2003 | 61.5 | 1.5 | ||||||||
EchoStar XVI(1) | ESS | November 2012 | 61.5 | 15 | ||||||||
Leased from Other Third Parties(3): |
| |||||||||||
AMC-15 | ESS | January 2005 | 105 | 10 | ||||||||
AMC-16 | ESS | February 2005 | 85 | 10 | ||||||||
Nimiq 5(1) | ESS | October 2009 | 72.7 | 15 | ||||||||
QuetzSat-1(1) | ESS | November 2011 | 77 | 10 | ||||||||
Recent Developments EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI, EchoStar XIV. On February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with DISH Network to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, EchoStar and HSS will issue shares of preferred tracking stock to DISH Network in exchange for five satellites owned by DISH Network (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV) (including related in-orbit incentive obligations and interest payments of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, DISH Network will lease certain satellite capacity on these five satellites (collectively, the "Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction"). See Note 20 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our subsequent events. EchoStar VI and VIII. DISH Network leases satellite capacity from us on certain of our satellites. The leases for the EchoStar VI and VIII satellites expired in accordance with their terms in the first quarter of 2013. EchoStar VI was fully depreciated in August 2012. In May 2013, DISH Network began leasing capacity from us on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare. Effective March 1, 2014, this lease will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice. EchoStar XVI. In November 2012, we launched the EchoStar XVI satellite, a direct broadcast satellite ("DBS"). EchoStar XVI is leased to DISH Network for the delivery of DTH broadcast services to DISH Network customers in the U.S. We began leasing capacity on EchoStar XVI to DISH Network in January 2013. EchoStar XIX. In March 2013, we entered into a contract for the design and construction of the EchoStar XIX satellite, which is expected to be launched in mid-2016. EchoStar XIX is our next-generation, high throughput geostationary satellite that will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for our broadband services to the consumer market in North America. TerreStar-2. In August 2013, we and DISH Network entered into a development agreement ("T2 Development Agreement") with respect to the TerreStar-2 ("T2") satellite under which we reimburse DISH Network for amounts it pays to Space Systems/Loral, LLC ("SS/L") in connection with the construction of the T2 satellite. As amended in December 2013, the T2 Development Agreement provides for the ability to purchase DISH Network's rights and obligations under the T2 satellite construction agreement with SS/L. The T2 satellite is designed to provide mobile satellite services using S-band frequencies and we may use this satellite in conjunction with our recently acquired S-band spectrum in Europe. EchoStar XV. In May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity from DISH Network on EchoStar XV as an operating lease and relocated the satellite to the 45 degree west longitude orbital location for testing pursuant to our Brazilian Authorization. Effective March 1, 2014, this lease will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice. QuetzSat-1. In 2008, we entered into a transponder service agreement with SES to lease all of the capacity on QuetzSat-1. Concurrently, in 2008, we entered into a transponder service agreement with DISH Network, pursuant to which, DISH Network agreed to lease 24 of the DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1 when it is placed into commercial operation at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. In January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was moved to the 77 degree west longitude orbital location and commenced commercial operations in February 2013. See Note 19 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this 1719 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion of our related party transactions with DISH Network.Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport for further discussion of our Related Party Transactionsagreement with DISH Network.Network relating to QuetzSat-1.(2)Fully depreciated and currently an in-orbit spare.(3)These satellites are accounted for as capital leases.(4)Original useful life represents the remaining useful life as of the date of the Hughes Acquisition.Recent DevelopmentsQuetzSat-1. During 2008, we entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”) to lease all of the capacity on QuetzSat-1. This lease is accounted for as a capital lease. DISH Network has agreed to lease 24 of the 32 direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) transponders on this satellite from us when QuetzSat-1 is placed into commercial operation at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter 2011 at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location while we and DISH Network explore alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite. In the interim, we are providing DISH Network with alternate capacity at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. We
commenced payments under our agreement with SES upon the placement of the QuetzSat-1 satellite at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location.
Satellite Anomalies
Prior to 2011, certainCertain of our satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant adverse impact on their remaining useful lifelives and/or commercial operation.operations. There can be no assurance that future anomalies will not further impact the remaining useful life and commercial operation of any of these satellites. See “Long-Lived Satellite Assets”the satellites in Note 6 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of evaluation of impairment.fleet. In addition, there can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. We generally do not carry in-orbit insurance on any of our satellites, other than SPACEWAY 3, andsatellites; therefore, we willgenerally bear the risk of any uninsured in-orbit failures. However, pursuantPursuant to the terms of the agreements governing certain portions of our indebtedness, we are required, subject to certain limitations on coverage, to obtainmaintain launch and in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter andSPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVI, and to maintain in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, EchoStar XVI and SPACEWAY 3. SatelliteXVII. The recent satellite anomalies with respect tothat have affected certain of our satellites are discussed below.
Owned Satellites
EchoStar III. EchoStar III was originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 DBS transponders in a mode that provides service to the entire continental United States ("CONUS"). As a result of the failure of traveling wave tube amplifiers ("TWTAs") in previous years, including the most recent failures in February 2013 and April 2013, only six transponders are currently available for use. It is
Owned Satelliteslikely that additional TWTA failures will occur from time to time in the future and such failures could further impact commercial operation of the satellite. EchoStar III was fully depreciated in 2009 and is currently used as an in-orbit spare.
EchoStar IV.VI. During 2011, EchoStar IVVI was removed fromdesigned to operate 32 DBS transponders with a minimum 12-year useful life. Prior to 2012, EchoStar VI experienced solar array anomalies and the 77 degree west longitude orbital location and retired from commercial service. This retirementloss of TWTAs that did not have a materialreduce its useful life; however, these solar array anomalies impacted the commercial operation of the satellite. EchoStar VI lost (i) two additional TWTAs in March 2012, increasing the total number of TWTAs lost on the satellite to five out of 48 TWTAs and (ii) an additional solar array string during the second quarter of 2012, reducing the total power available for use by the spacecraft. The anomalies in 2012 did not impact on our resultsthe current commercial operation or the estimated useful life of operationsthe satellite. However, there can be no assurance that these anomalies or financial position.any future anomalies will not reduce the satellite's useful life or impact its commercial operation. EchoStar VI was fully depreciated in August 2012.
EchoStar VIIIVIII.. EchoStar VIII was designed to operate 32 DBS transponders in the continental U.S.CONUS at approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable to 16 DBS transponders operating at approximately 240 watts per channel. EchoStar VIII was also designed with spot-beam technology. This satellite has experienced several anomalies priorPrior to and during 2011.2011, EchoStar VIII experienced several anomalies. In January 2011, the satelliteEchoStar VIII experienced an anomaly which temporarily disrupted electrical power to some components, causing an interruption of broadcast service. In addition, it has recently been determined thatservice and causing one of the two on-board computers used to control the satellite failed in connection with the January 2011 anomaly. None of theseto fail. These anomalies hashave not impacted the commercial operation or estimated useful life of the satellite. However, if the remaining on-board computer fails, the commercial operation of the satellite would likely be substantially impactedcease and may result in an impairmenta complete loss of the satellite. There can also be no assurance that these or any future anomalies will not reduce its useful life or impact its commercial operation.
Satellites Under ConstructionEchoStar XII.
EchoStar XVI. During November 2009, we entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVI, aXII was designed to operate 13 DBS satellite, which is expected to be launched during the second half of 2012 and will operatetransponders at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. DISH Network has agreed to lease all of the capacity on this satellite from us for a portion of its useful life.
EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. During June 2009, Hughes Communications entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, a next-generation, high throughput geostationary satellite, which will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for our broadband internet service to the consumer market in North America. EchoStar XVII/Jupiter will operate at the 107 degree west longitude orbital location and is expected to be launched during the summer of 2012.
Satellite Impairments
AMC-15. AMC-15, a fixed satellite services (“FSS”) satellite, commenced commercial operation during January 2005 and currently operates at the 105 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite is equipped with 24 Ku FSS transponders that operate at approximately 120270 watts per channel in CONUS mode, or 22 spot beams using a combination of 135 and a Ka FSS payload consisting65 watt TWTAs or hybrid CONUS/spot beam mode. We currently operate EchoStar XII in spot beam mode. Prior to 2010, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of 12 spot beams. During 2011, AMC-15electrical power available from its solar arrays. In September 2012, November 2012, and January 2013, EchoStar XII experienced solar-poweradditional solar array anomalies, which caused afurther reduced the electrical power available to operate EchoStar XII. An engineering analysis completed in the second quarter of 2013 indicated further loss that reduced its capacity. Pursuant to the satellite services agreement, we negotiated a reduction of our monthly recurring payment, which impacted the carrying value of the satelliteavailable electrical power and the related capital lease obligation. The monthly recurring
payment has been reduced and asresulting capacity loss was likely. As a result, our capital lease obligationwe recognized a $34.7 million impairment loss in the second quarter of 2013. Additional solar array anomalies are likely and, if they occur, they will continue to degrade the corresponding asset value was decreased by a totaloperational capability of $20 million each.EchoStar XII and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future.
Leased Satellites
AMC-16. AMC-16, an FSS satellite, commenced commercial operation during February 2005 and currently operates at the 85 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite is equipped with2005. AMC-16 was designed to operate 24 Ku-band FSS transponders that operate at approximately 120 watts per channel and a Ka-band payload consisting of 12 spot beams. During 2010,In each of February 2012, April 2012, and November 2012, AMC-16 experienced a solar-power anomaly, which caused a partial power loss that reduced its capacity. Pursuant to the satellite services agreement, we are entitled to a reduction of our monthly recurring payment in the event of aadditional partial loss of satellite capacity. During 2010,As a result of prior period depreciation and adjustments associated with satellite anomalies, the monthly recurring paymentnet carrying amount of AMC-16 was reduced andto zero as a result,of December 31, 2010. Thereafter, subsequent reductions in our capital lease obligation and the corresponding asset value, was decreased by a total of $39 million. In addition, beginningresulting from reductions in May 2011, the monthlyour recurring payment was further reduced due to the 2010 anomaly andlease payments are recognized as a resultgains in "Other, net" on our capital lease obligation was further decreased by approximately $7 million. AMC-16 currently has no net book value (due to prior period impairments) therefore a $7 million gain was recorded in “Other, net” on ourCondensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the first quarter 2012, AMC-16 experienced an additional solar-power anomaly, which caused a partial power loss that further reduced its capacity. Testing is being performed to determine the extent to which this anomaly impacted its commercial operations, the extent to which theUpon determination of related reductions in our monthly recurring payment may be furtherpayments, we reduced and the extent to which our capital lease obligation may be further decreased.for AMC-16 and recognized corresponding gains of $12.6 million in 2012 and $6.7 million in 2013. There can be no assurance that this anomalythe existing anomalies or any future anomalies will not reduce itsAMC-16's useful life or further impact its commercial operations.
CMBStar.Satellite Impairments During 2008,
We evaluate our satellites for impairment and test for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Certain of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the physical condition of a particular satellite. However, based on the redundancy designed within each satellite, certain of these anomalies are not necessarily considered to be significant events that would require a test of recoverability.
As discussed further in Note 8 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15, we suspended constructionrecognized a $34.7 million impairment loss in the second quarter of 2013 as result of the anomalies affecting the commercial operation of EchoStar XII, and we recognized a $33.0 million impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2011 based on our analysis of potential uses for the CMBStar satellite and recorded an $85 million impairment. During 2011, we performed our annual impairment analysis and determined that the discounted cash flows would not recover the carrying amount of this satellite resultingfor which construction was suspended in an additional $33 million impairment. We determined the fair value of this satellite by evaluating the probable cash flows that we may receive from potential uses including what other purchasers in the market may have paid for a reasonably similar asset and the fair value we could realize should we deploy the satellite in a manner different from its original intended use (for example, we considered component resale values). The valuation model used Level 3 inputs. We continue to explore alternative uses for this satellite, including potentially reconfiguring the satellite and changing its proposed orbital location in a manner that would be more cost-effective than designing and constructing a new satellite. There can be no assurance that this satellite will not be further impaired in the future.2008.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS
We are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FCC for our domestic, as well as some international, satellite and telecommunications operations.operations and equipment businesses. We are also regulated by other federal agencies, state and local authorities, the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”("ITU"), and certain foreign governments.governments, including the EU. In addition, we are also subject to the export control laws and regulations and trade and economic sanctions laws and regulations of the U.S. with respect to the export of telecommunications equipment and services. Depending upon the circumstances, noncompliance with applicable legislation or regulations could result in suspension or revocation of our licenses or authorizations, the termination or loss of contracts or the imposition of contractual damages, civil fines or criminal penalties.
The following summary of regulatory developments and legislation is not intended to describe all present and proposed government regulation and legislation affecting the satellite and digital set-top box equipment markets. Government regulations that are currently the subject of judicial or administrative proceedings, legislative hearings or administrative proposals could adversely affect us and our industries to varying degrees. We cannot predict either the outcome of these proceedings or any potential impact they might have on the industry or on our operations.
Regulations Applicable to SatelliteOur Communications Operations
FCC Jurisdiction over Satellite and Terrestrial Operations.
The Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”"Communications Act") gives the FCC broad authority to regulate our satellite and terrestrial operations. All non-federal entities, including commercial entities that use radio frequencies to provide communications services into, from or within the U.S. are subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under the Communications Act. Specifically, the Communications Act gives the FCC regulatory jurisdiction over the following areas relating to communications satellite operations:
·
·
·
·
·
To obtain FCC licenses and authorizations for satellites and earth stations, satellite operators must satisfy strictenumerated legal, technical, and financial qualification requirements. Once issued, these licenses and authorizations aremay be subject to a number of conditions including, among other things, satisfaction of certain technical and ongoing due diligence obligations, implementation bonds, construction milestones, annual regulatory fees, and various reporting requirements. Applications for new or modified satellites and earth stations are necessary for further development and expansion of satellitessatellite services and generally must be approved by thereceive advance FCC in advance.approval. Necessary federal approval of these applications may not be granted, may not be granted in a timely manner, or may be granted subject to conditions which may be cumbersome.
Licenses, Authorizations and Contractual Rights for Satellite Capacity
Our spacecraft operations The regulatory requirements are subject to the licensing jurisdiction of, and conditions imposed by, among others, the FCC and any other government whose ITU filing we use to operate a satellite. Such conditions may include, for example, that we implement the satellite systemperiodic change in a manner consistent with certain milestones (such as for contracting, satellite design, construction, and launch and implementation of service), that the satellite control center be located in national territory, that a license be obtained prior to launching or operating the satellite or that a license be obtained before interconnectingaccordance with the local switched telephone network.
DTH Video Satellites. Our DBS satellites are located in orbital positions, or slots, that are designated by their western longitude. An orbital position describes both a physical location in space (at a fixed altitude of approximately 22,300 miles above the Earth’s equator) and an assignment of spectrum in the applicable frequency band. Each transponder on our satellites typically exploits one frequency channel, which can yield several channels of video programming by means of digital compression. Certain of our satellites also include spot-beam technology that enables us to provide services on a local or regional basis, but reduces the number of frequency channels that could otherwise be utilized across the entire U.S.
We have U.S. DBS licenses for 30 frequency channels at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location, capable of providing service to the Eastern and Central U.S. We are also currently operating on the two unassigned frequency channels at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location under a conditional special temporary authorization. That authority requires periodic renewal every 180 days. The licensing method for assigning these two channels will be decided in a pending FCC rulemaking proceeding, and these two channels are currently subject to an FCC moratorium on new DBS applications. The FCC has previously found that existing DBS providers will not be eligible for the two unassigned channels at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. There is a pending petition for reconsideration of that decision, which will be evaluated as partprovisions of the FCC rulemaking.
Administrative Procedures Act.
We also have FCC authority to provide service from a Mexican DBS orbital slot at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location using 24 frequency channels and at a Canadian DBS orbital slot at the 72.7 degree west longitude orbital location using 32 frequency channels. In addition, we hold licenses or have entered into agreements to lease capacity on satellites at FSS orbital locations including:
·500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 32 frequency channels at the 121 degree west longitude orbital location, capable of providing service to CONUS, plus 900 MHz of Ka spectrum at the 121 degree west longitude orbital location capable of providing service into select spot beams;
·500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 24 frequency channels at the 105 degree west longitude orbital location, currently capable of providing service to CONUS, Alaska and Hawaii, plus at least 720 MHz of Ka spectrum capable of providing service into select spot beams; and
·500 MHz of Ku spectrum divided into 24 frequency channels at the 85 degree west longitude orbital location, currently capable of providing service to CONUS, plus at least 720 MHz of Ka spectrum capable of providing service into select spot beams.
In addition, we have a number of modifications, special temporary authorities, and license applications pending with the FCC. There can be no assurance that the FCC will grant any of these applications, or that the authorizations, if granted, will not be subject to onerous conditions. Moreover, the cost of building and launching a satellite can be as much as $300 million or more, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to construct and launch all of the satellites for which we have requested authorization.
Furthermore, we were the high bidder at an auction conducted by ANATEL, the communications regulatory authority in Brazil for a license to use the DBS spectrum at the 45 degree west longitude orbital location to provide direct-to-home services. We have applied to ANATEL for a license for that slot. This authorization would also allow for the operation of broadband or mobile services from the 45 degree west longitude orbital position.
Broadband Satellites. We currently hold a license to operate SPACEWAY 3 at the 95 degree west longitude orbital location, which is in-orbit. SPACEWAY 3 is capable of providing service to the U.S. and Canada.
We also hold an authorization issued by the Office of Communications in the United Kingdom (“Ofcom”) and a Letter of Intent authorization from the FCC that will allow us to operate the EchoStar XVII/Jupiter satellite from the 107 degree west longitude orbital location and transmit to earth stations located in the U.S., when it is launched, which is expected to be in the summer of 2012. We have authorizations issued by Ofcom and have filed applications with the FCC to operate satellites at certain additional locations on the geostationary arc in anticipation of the deployment of future satellites. We cannot be certain that we will meet our progress milestones or other requirements with respect to our current or future licenses, or that our pending applications for new or modified authority will be granted.
Duration of Satellite Licenses. Generally speaking, all satellite licenses granted by the FCC are subject to expiration unless renewed by the FCC. The term of each of our DBS licenses is 10 years, and our FSS licenses generally have 15 year terms. Our licenses are currently set to expire at various times. In addition, special temporary authorizations are granted for periods of only 180 days or less, subject to possible renewal by the FCC. Generally, our FCC satellite licenses and special temporary authorizations have been renewed by the FCC on a routine basis, but there can be no assurance that the FCC will continue to do so. Licenses granted by ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory authority, are valid for 30 years and there is no specified time limit for authorizations granted by Ofcom.
The earth station licenses we hold are granted for terms that vary significantly depending upon the jurisdiction in which they were obtained. The FCC also has granted periodic requests by us for special temporary authorizations and experimental authorizations to operate new or modified facilities on a temporary basis. There can be no assurance that the FCC or other regulators will continue granting applications for new earth stations or for the renewal of existing ones.
Opposition and Other Risks to Our Licenses. Several third parties have opposed, and we expect them to continue to oppose, some of our FCC satellite authorizations and pending and future requests to the FCC for extensions, modifications, waivers and approvals of our licenses. In addition, we may not have fully complied with all of the FCC reporting, filing and other requirements in connection with our satellite authorizations. Consequently, it is possible the FCC could revoke, terminate, condition or decline to extend or renew certain of our authorizations or licenses.
Reverse Band (17/24 GHz BSS) Spectrum. Recently authorized 17/24 GHz BSS operations may interfere with the uplink operations of our DBS satellites. At this time, no applications have been filed to operate a 17/24 GHz BSS satellite near our DBS satellites at 61.5 degrees. However, it is possible that such an application may be filed in the future. Furthermore, the FCC has a pending rulemaking to decide how to protect DBS satellites from 17/24 GHz BSS operations, and we cannot predict if and how the final rules will affect either our DBS operations at 61.5 degrees.
LMDS Licenses. In 2010, we purchased an additional equity interest in Alta Wireless, Inc. which holds certain authorizations for Local Multipoint Distribution Service (“LMDS”) licenses in each of Kansas City, Phoenix, Cheyenne, and San Diego.
Interference from Other Services Sharing Satellite Spectrum. The FCC has adopted rules that allow non-geostationary orbit satellite services to operate on a co-primary basis in the same frequency band as DBS and FSS. The FCC has also authorized the use of multichannel video and data distribution service (“MVDDS”) in the DBS band. MVDDS licenses were auctioned in 2004. While, to our knowledge, no MVDDS systems have been commercially deployed, several systems are now being tested, and may soon be deployed. Despite regulatory provisions designed to protect DBS and FSS operations from harmful interference, there can be no assurance that operations by other satellites or terrestrial communication services in the DBS and FSS bands will not interfere with our DBS and FSS operations and adversely affect our business.
International Satellite Competition and Interference for Our DTH Video Satellites. As noted above, we have received authority to provide DBS service to the U.S. from a Mexican orbital slot at 77 degrees, and a Canadian orbital slot at 72.7 degrees. DirecTV, Spectrum Five and DISH Network have received similar authorizations to provide service to the U.S. from foreign orbital slots. The possibility that the FCC will allow service to the U.S. from additional foreign slots may permit additional competition against us from other satellite providers. It may also provide a means by which to increase our available satellite capacity in the U.S. In addition, a number of administrations, such as Great Britain and The Netherlands, have requested to add orbital locations serving the U.S. close to our licensed slots. Such operations could cause harmful interference to our satellites and constrain our future operations at those slots if such “tweener” operations are approved by the FCC. The risk of harmful interference will depend upon the final rules adopted in the FCC’s “tweener” proceeding.
Regulations Applicable to Our EchoStar Technologies Segment
FCC Jurisdiction over Set-Top Box OperationsOperations.. Our digital set-top boxes and similar devices must also comply with FCC technical standards and requirements, including accessibility requirements. The FCC has specific Part 15 regulations for television broadcast receivers and television interface devices. We are also subject to FCC rules on disability accessibility.
Separate Security Plug and PlayPlay.. U.S. cable companies are required by law to separate the security from the other functionality of their set-top boxes. Set-top boxes used by DBS providers are not currently subject to this separate security requirement. However, the FCC is currently considering a possible expansion of the requirement to these set-top boxes. The development of a retail market for cable set-top boxes could provide us with an opportunity to expand sales of set-top boxes and related equipment for use in non-DBS households. The cable industry and consumer electronics companies have reached a “tru2way”"tru2way" commercial arrangement to resolve many of the outstanding issues related to this requirement. We have licensed tru2way technology for use with cable set-top boxes. We cannot predict whether the FCC will impose rules on DBS providers that are based on cable “plug"plug and play”play" rules or the concepts from the private tru2way commercial arrangement. Complying with the separate security and other "plug and play" requirements would require potentially costly modifications to our set-top boxes and operations. We cannot predict the timing or outcome of this FCC proceeding. If the FCC were to extend or expand its separate security rules or the tru2way commercial arrangement to include DBS providers, sales of our set-top boxes to DBS providers may be negatively impacted. Specifically, if
Foreign Administrations' Jurisdiction Over Satellite and Terrestrial Operations
Some of our satellites and earth stations are licensed in foreign jurisdictions. In order to provide service to a retail DBS set-top box market develops capable of
accepting removable security modules, there isforeign location from a risk thatU.S. satellite we would have reduced sales if competitors produce DBS set-top boxes.
Telecommunications Regulation
We aremay be required to contribute a percentage of our revenuesobtain approvals from telecommunications services to the Universal Service Fund to support mechanisms that subsidize the provision of services to low-income consumers, high-cost areas, schools, libraries and rural health care providers. This percentage is set each calendar quarter by the FCC. Current FCC rules permit us to pass this Universal Service Fund contribution through to our customers. The FCC also requires broadband Internet access and Internet telephony service providers to comply with the requirements of the Federal Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (“CALEA”). CALEA generally requires telecommunications carriers, including satellite-based carriers, to ensure that law enforcement agencies are able to conduct lawfully-authorized surveillance of users of their services. In addition, as a provider of interconnected VOIP services, we are required to abide by a number of rules related to telephony service, including rules dealing with the protection of customer information and the processing of emergency calls.
State and Local Regulation
We are also regulated by other federal agencies, and state and local authorities. While the FCC has preempted many state and local regulations that impair the installation and use of VSATs and other consumer satellite dishes, our businesses nonetheless may be adversely affected by state and local regulation, including, among others, zoning regulations that impair the ability to install these consumer satellite earth station antennas.
International Regulation
In addition, we are subject to regulation by the ITU and certain foreign governments and national communications regulatory authorities of other countries in which we, and under certain circumstances our resellers and distributors, provide services or operate earth stations.administrative agencies. The laws and regulatory requirements regulatingregulations addressing access to satellite and terrestrial systems vary from country to country. In certain countries, a license is required to provide our services and to operate satellite earth stations. The application procedure can be time-consuming and costly, in some countries, and the terms of licenses vary for different countries. In somefrom country to country. Some countries there may behave restrictions on our ability to interconnect with the local switched telephone network.services we provide and how we provide them. In addition, in certain countries there are limitations onmay limit the fees that can be charged for the services we provide.
Many countries permit competition in the provision of voice, data, or video services, the ownership of the equipment needed to provide telecommunications services and the provision of transponder capacity to that country. We believe that this trend should continue due to commitments by many countries to open their satellite markets to competition. In othersome countries, however, a single entity, often the government-owned telecommunications authority, may hold a monopoly on the ownership and operation of telecommunications facilities or on the provision of telecommunications to, from or within the country. In those cases, we may be required to negotiate for access to service or equipment provided by that monopoly entity, and we may not be able to obtain favorable rates or other terms.
Licenses, Authorizations and Contractual Rights for Satellite Capacity
Our spacecraft operations are subject to the licensing jurisdiction of, and conditions imposed by, among others, the FCC and any other government whose ITU filing we use for our satellites. Such conditions may include, for example, implementation and operation of the satellite system in a manner consistent with certain milestones (such as for contracting, satellite design, construction, launch, and implementation of service), that the satellite or its launch be procured through a national entity, that the satellite control center be located in national territory, that a license be obtained prior to launching or operating the satellite, or that a license be obtained before interconnecting with the local switched telephone network.
Duration of Satellite and Terrestrial Licenses. Generally speaking, all satellite licenses granted by the FCC and most foreign countries are subject to expiration unless extended by the relevant regulatory authority. The term of each of our U.S. DBS licenses is 10 years, and our U.S. FSS licenses generally have 15-year terms. Our licenses are currently set to expire at various times. In addition, we occasionally receive special temporary authorizations that are granted for limited periods of time (e.g., 180 days or less) and subject to possible extension. Generally, our satellite licenses and special temporary authorizations have been renewed on a routine basis, but there can be no assurance that this will continue.
The earth station licenses we hold are granted for terms that vary significantly depending upon the jurisdiction in which they were obtained. Some regulators have granted periodic requests by us for special temporary authorizations to operate new or modified facilities on a temporary basis, or experimental authorizations that allow us to test and develop new equipment or new service capabilities on a limited basis. There can be no assurance that the FCC or other regulators will continue granting applications for new earth stations or for the renewal of existing ones.
Interference from Other Services Sharing Satellite Spectrum. The FCC and some other regulators have adopted rules that allow non-geostationary orbit satellite services to operate on a co-primary basis in the same frequency band as DBS and FSS. The FCC has also authorized the use of multichannel video and data distribution service ("MVDDS") in the DBS band. Several MVDDS systems are now being commercially deployed. Despite regulatory provisions designed to protect DBS and FSS operations from harmful interference, there can be no assurance that operations by other satellites or terrestrial communication services in the DBS and FSS bands will not interfere with our DBS and FSS operations and adversely affect our business.
International TelecommunicationSatellite Competition and Interference for Our DTH Video Satellites. We have received authority to provide DBS service to the U.S. from a Mexican orbital slot at 77 degrees, and a Canadian orbital slot at 72.7 degrees. DirecTV, Spectrum Five LLC, and DISH Network have received similar authorizations to provide service to the U.S. from foreign orbital slots. The possibility that the FCC will allow service to the U.S. from additional foreign slots may permit additional competition against us from other satellite providers. In addition, a number of administrations, such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, have requested to allow satellite systems to have access to orbital locations serving the U.S. near our licensed slots. Such operations could cause harmful interference to our satellites and constrain our future operations at those slots if such "tweener" operations are approved by the FCC.
Telecommunications Regulation
We are required to contribute a percentage of our revenue from telecommunications services to the Universal Service Fund to support mechanisms that subsidize the provision of services to low-income consumers, high-cost areas, schools, libraries, and rural health care providers. This percentage is set each calendar quarter by the FCC. Current FCC rules permit us to pass this Universal Service Fund
contribution through to our customers. The FCC also requires broadband internet access and internet telephony service providers to comply with the requirements of the Federal Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act ("CALEA"). CALEA generally requires telecommunications carriers, including satellite-based carriers, to ensure that law enforcement agencies are able to conduct lawfully-authorized surveillance of users of their services. In addition, as a provider of interconnected voice over internet protocol services ("VOIP"), we are required to abide by a number of rules related to telephony service, including rules dealing with the protection of customer information and the processing of emergency calls.
State and Local Regulation
We are also regulated by state and local authorities. While the FCC has preempted many state and local regulations that would impair the installation and use of VSATs and other consumer satellite dishes, our businesses nonetheless may be subject to state and local regulation, including, among others, obtaining regulatory authorizations and zoning regulations that affect the ability to install these consumer satellite earth station antennas.
International Regulation
We are subject to regulation by the International Communications Union ("ITU") and our satellites must be registered in the United Nations ("UN") Registry of Space Objects.
The ITU Frequency Registration. The orbital location and frequencies for certain of our satellites are subject to the frequency registration and coordination process of the ITU. The ITU Radio Regulations define the international rules, regulations, and rights for a satellite and associated earth stations to use specific radio frequencies at a specific orbital location. These rules, which include deadlines for the bringing of satellite networks into use, differ depending on the type of service to be provided and the spectrumfrequencies to be used by the satellite. On our behalf, the FCC and Ofcomvarious countries have made and may in the future make additional filings withfor the ITU for SPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVII/Jupiterfrequency assignments at particular orbital locations that are used or to be used by our current satellite networks and for other potential future satellitessatellite networks we may build or acquire. The U.S. government has also filed requests for modification of the ITU Region 2 Broadcasting-Satellite Service (“BSS”) plan relating to certain of our DBS satellites. The FCC and Ofcom may make future ITU filings with respect to our proposed FSS and DBS satellites. In the event the international coordination process that is triggered by ITU filings under applicable rules is not successfully completed, or that the requests for modification of the BSS plan are not granted by the ITU, we will have to operate the applicable satellite(s) on a non-interference basis. If we cannot do so, we may have to cease operating such satellite(s) at the affected orbital location.locations. We cannot be sure of the successful
outcome of these ITU processes. We have cooperated, and will continue to cooperate, with the FCC and Ofcomfiling nation in the preparation of ITU filings, coordination of our operations in accordance with the relevant ITU Radio Regulations, and responses.responses to relevant ITU inquiries.
Registration in the UN Registry of Space Objects. The U.S. and other jurisdictions in which we license satellites are parties to the UN Convention on the Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space ("UN Convention").
The UN Convention requires a satellite's launching state to register the satellite as a space object. The act of registration carries liability for the registering country in the event that the satellite causes third party damage. Administrations may place certain requirements on satellite licensees in order to procure the necessary launch or operational authorizations that accompany registration of the satellite. In some jurisdictions, these authorizations are separate and distinct, with unique requirements, from the authorization to use a set of frequencies to provide satellite services. There is no guarantee that we will be able to procure such authorizations even if we already possess a frequency authorization.
Export Control Regulation
In the operation of our business, we must comply with all applicable export control and economic sanctions laws and regulations of the U.S. and other countries. Applicable U.S. laws and regulations include the Arms Export Control Act, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”("ITAR"), the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”("EAR"), and the trade sanctions laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’sTreasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”("OFAC").
The export of certain hardware, technical data, and services relating to satellites and the supply of certain ground control equipment, technical services and data and satellite communication/control services to non-U.S. persons or to destinations outside the U.S. is regulated by the U.S. Department of State’sState's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, under the ITAR and is subject to strict export control and prior approval requirements. Other items are controlled for export by the U.S. Department of Commerce’sCommerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”("BIS") under the EAR. For example, BIS regulates our export of satellite communications network equipment for earth stations in ground networks locatedto non-U.S. persons or to destinations outside of the U.S. In addition, we cannot provide certain equipment or services to certain countries subject to U.S. trade sanctions unless we first obtain the necessary authorizations from OFAC. We are also subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which generally prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments or giving or promising to give anything of value to foreign government officials and other individuals for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining a competitive advantage.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to the requirements of federal, state, local, and foreign environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations. These include laws regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management, hazardous chemicals and product disposal, most significantly the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”("RCRA") and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (“EPCRA”("EPCRA"). Under the RCRA, our Hughes segment is considered a small quantity generator.
As required by the EPCRA, we file periodic reports with regulators covering four areas: Emergency Planning, Emergency Release, Hazardous Chemical Storage, and Toxic Chemical Release. We maintain small quantities of hazardous materials on our premises and, therefore, have relatively modest reporting requirements under the EPCRA. We are also subject to the requirements of other environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations.
Additionally, we review Tier II reporting requirements of the Department of Environmental Quality which requires reporting the storage of hazardous materials in large quantities and if they've changed from year to year. These are state run programs and each state may have slightly different requirements.
Our environmental compliance costs to date have not been material, and we currently have no reason to believe that such costs will become material in the foreseeable future. We do not expect capital or other expenditures for environmental compliance to be material in 2012 or 2013.2014. However, environmental requirements are complex, change frequently, and have become more stringent over time. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that these requirements will not change or become more stringent in the future in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS
We currently rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark law, together with licenses, non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements and technical measures, to establish and protect proprietary rights in our products. We hold U.S. patents covering various aspects of our products and services, including patents covering technologies that we believe will enable the production of lower cost satellite terminals and provide for significant acceleration of communication speeds and enhancement of throughput. The duration of each of our U.S. patents is generally 20 years from the
earliest filing date to which the patent has priority. We have granted licenses to use our trademarks and service-marks to resellers worldwide, and we typically retain the right to monitor the use of those marks and impose significant restrictions on their use in efforts to ensure a consistent brand identity. We protect our proprietary rights in our software through software licenses that, among other things, require that the software source code be maintained as confidential information and that prohibit any reverse-engineering of that code.
We believe that our patents are important to our business. We also believe that, in some areas, the improvement of existing products and the development of new products, as well as reliance upon trade secrets and unpatented proprietary know-how, are important in establishing and maintaining a competitive advantage. We believe, to a certain extent, that the value of our products and services are dependent upon our proprietary software, hardware, and other technology remaining trade secrets and/or subject to copyright protection. Generally, we enter into non-disclosure and invention assignment agreements with our employees, subcontractors, and certain customers and other business partners.
In general, if a court determines that one or more of our products infringes valid intellectual property rights held by others, we may be required to cease developing or marketing those products, obtain licenses from the holders of the intellectual property at a material cost, or redesign those products in such a way as to avoid infringement. If those intellectual property rights are held by a competitor, we may be unable to obtain a license to such intellectual property at any price, which could adversely affect our competitive position.
We may not be aware of all patents and other intellectual property rights that our products and services may potentially infringe. In addition, patent applications in the U.S. are confidential until the Patent and Trademark Office either publishes the application or issues a patent (whichever arises first) and, accordingly, our products may infringe claims contained in pending patent applications of which we are not aware. Further, the process of determining definitively whether a patent claim is valid and whether a particular product infringes a valid patent claim often involves expensive and protracted litigation, even if we are ultimately successful on the merits.
We cannot estimate the extent to which we may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect to intellectual property rights held by others and the availability and cost of any such licenses. Those costs, and their impact on our results of operations, could be material. Damages in patent infringement cases can be substantial, and in certain circumstances, can be trebled. To the extent that we are required to pay unanticipated royalties to third parties, these increased costs of doing business could negatively affect our liquidity and operating results. We are currently defending multiple patent infringement actions.actions and may assert our own actions against parties we suspect of infringing our patents and trademarks. We cannot be certain the courts will conclude these companies do not own the rights they claim, that these rights are not valid, or that our products and services do not infringe on these rights. We also cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain licenses from these persons on commercially reasonable terms or, if we were unable to obtain such licenses, that we would be able to redesign our products and services to avoid infringement. The legal costs associated with defending patent suits and pursuing patent claims against others may be borne by us if we are not awarded reimbursement through the legal process. See “Item 3 — Item 3—Legal Proceedings.”Proceedings of this report for more information.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING
We have a skilled and multi-disciplined engineering organization that develops our products and services. Our in-house technological capability includes a wide range of skills required to develop thesystems, hardware, software, and firmware used in our products and services. In addition, to our product development skills, over the past 30 years, Hughes Communications haswe have pioneered numerous advances in the area of wireless communication systems, techniques and methodologies. EchoStar has pioneered many advances in the areas
methodologies, television broadcasting, video placeshifting, video copy protection, and digital video recording.
With respect to hardware development, we have skill sets that include complex digital designs, radio frequency and intermediate frequency analog designs, advanced application-specific integrated circuit designs, and sophisticated consumer and system level packaging designs. We also have extensive experience in developing products for high-volume, low-cost manufacturing for the consumer industry, including satellite TV set-top receivers and dual mode satellite and cellularwireless handsets.
As a complement to our hardware development, we have developed extensive experience in designing reliable, real time, embedded software systems as part of our telecommunicationcommunication systems and services offerings. For example, our broadband product line for the enterprise market supports an extensive range of protocols for data communications. Our software engineers have also developed many large turnkey systems for our customers by designing the overall solution, implementing the various subsystems, deploying the entire network and user terminals, integrating and verifying the operational system, and ultimately training the customers’customers' technicians and operators.
GEOGRAPHIC AREA DATA AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MAJOR CUSTOMERS
For principal geographic area data and transactions with major customers for 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, see Note 1517 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.report. See “Item 1A — Item 1A—Risk Factors”Factors for information regarding risks attendant to our foreign operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had approximately 4,2004,000 employees and generally consider relations with them to be good. In addition, DISH Network provides us with certain management and administrative services, which include the services of certain employees of DISH Network. See “Certain Intercompany Agreements — Management Services Agreement andNote 19 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for a discussion of our Professional Services Agreement” set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”Service agreement. Other than 57approximately 100 of our employees located in Italy and Brazil, none are represented by a union.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and accordingly file an annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and other information with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’sSEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. As an electronic filer, our public filings are also maintained on the SEC’s InternetSEC's internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.sec.gov.
WEBSITE ACCESS
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act may also may be accessed free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with, or furnished it to, the SEC. The address of that website is http://www.echostar.com.
We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, in accordance with the Sarbanes-OxleySarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC promulgated thereunder. Our code of ethics is available on our corporate website at http://www.echostar.com. In the event that we make changes in, or provide waivers of, the provisions of this code of ethics that the SEC requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events on our website.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
(furnished in accordance with Item 401 (b)401(b) of Regulation S-K, pursuant to General Instruction G(3) of Form 10-K)
The following table and information below sets forth the name, age and position with EchoStar of each of our executive officers, the period during which each executive officer has served as such, and each executive officer’sofficer's business experience during at least the past five years:
Name | Age | Position | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charles W. Ergen |
| 60 |
| Chairman | |
|
|
| |||
Michael T. Dugan |
| 65 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | ||
|
| 56 | Executive Vice President, | ||
Mark W. Jackson |
| 53 | President, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. | ||
Anders N. Johnson |
| 56 | President, EchoStar | ||
Pradman P. Kaul |
| 67 | President, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Director | ||
Kenneth G. Carroll | 58 | Executive Vice President, Corporate and Business Development | |||
Sandi L. Kerentoff |
| 60 | Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources | ||
|
| 48 | Executive Vice President, | ||
Dean A. Manson |
| 47 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||
|
|
| |||
Charles W. Ergen. Mr. Ergen serveshas served as our executive Chairman since November 2009 and Chairman of the Board of Directors.Directors since our formation in 2007. Mr. Ergen served as our Chief Executive Officer from our formation in 2007 until November 2009. Mr. Ergen serves as executive Chairman and has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of DISH Network since its formation and, during the past five years, has held executive officer and director positions with DISH Network and its subsidiaries.
Michael T. Dugan.Mr. Dugan has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President of EchoStar since November 2009. Mr. Dugan has also servesserved as a member of our Board of Directors.Directors since our formation in 2007. Mr. Dugan served as a senior advisor to EchoStar sincefrom January 1, 2008.2008 until November 2009. From May 2004 to December 2007, he was a director of DISH Network, and served DISH Network alternately as Chief Technical Officer and senior advisor from time to time. Mr. Dugan served as a director of Frontier Corporation from October 2006 until November 2009.
David J. Rayner. Mr. Rayner has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer since December 2012. From November 2011 to November 2012, Mr. Rayner served as Chief Financial Officer of Tendril Networks, Inc., a Boulder, Colorado software company. Mr. Rayner served as our Chief Financial Officer from June 2010 to November 2011 and served as our Chief Administrative Officer from January 2008 to June 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Rayner served as Executive Vice President of Installation and Service Networks of DISH Network and had previously held the position of Chief Financial Officer of DISH Network from December 2004 to September 2006. Before joining DISH Network in December 2004, Mr. Rayner served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Time Warner Telecom in Denver, beginning in June 1998.
Mark W. Jackson. Mr. Jackson has served as President of EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. since 2004 and oversees all day to day operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment. Mr. Jackson served as President of EchoStar Technologies Corporation from June 2004 through December 2007.
Anders N. Johnson. Mr. Johnson has served as President of EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C. since June 2011. Mr. Johnson was most recently at SES World Skies where he served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Satellite Development. Mr. Johnson joined SES GLOBAL after the combination of GE Americom and SES GLOBAL in 2001. Prior to SES GLOBAL, Mr. Johnson worked at GE Capital beginning in 1985 in a variety of executive level roles in Satellite Services, Aviation Services, and Transportation & Industrial Financing.
Pradman P. Kaul. Mr. Kaul has served as President of Hughes Communications, Inc. since its formation in February 2006. Mr. Kaul has also served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2011 as well as a member of the board of directors of Hughes Communications from February 2006 until June 2011. Previously, Mr. Kaul served as the Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Director of Engineering of Hughes Network Systems, LLC ("HNS" and, together with Hughes Communications, "Hughes"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Hughes Communications.
Kenneth G. Carroll. Mr. Carroll has served as our Executive Vice President, Corporate and Business Development since December 2012. Mr. Carroll served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer sincefrom November 2011.2011 to November 2012. Mr. Carroll, a 20-year veteran in the satellite TV and satellite broadband industry, served as Chief Operating Officer of EchoStar Satellite Services from August 2010 to June 2011, and as Executive Vice President, Business Development and International, of EchoStar Corporation from June 2011 to November 2011. Prior to joining EchoStar, from 2003 to 2010, Mr. Carroll served as President and Chief Operating Officer of WildBlue Communications, Inc., a nationwide satellite broadband company. In addition, Mr. Carroll previously served as Chief Financial Officer for Liberty Satellite & Technology and DTH satellite TV provider, PrimeStar.
Mark W. Jackson. Mr. Jackson is currently the President of EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and oversees all day to day operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment. Mr. Jackson served as the President of EchoStar Technologies Corporation from June 2004 through December 2007.
Anders N. Johnson. Mr. Johnson has served as President of EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C. since June 2011. Mr. Johnson was most recently at SES World Skies where he served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Satellite Development. Mr. Johnson joined SES GLOBAL after the combination of GE Capital and SES GLOBAL in 2001. Prior to SES GLOBAL, Mr. Johnson worked at GE Capital beginning in 1985 in a variety of executive level roles in Satellite Services, Aviation Services and Transportation & Industrial Financing.
Pradman P. Kaul.Mr. Kaul has served as the President of Hughes Communications, Inc. since February 2006. Mr. Kaul also serves as a member of our Board of Directors. Previously, Mr. Kaul served as the Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Director of Engineering of Hughes Network Systems, LLC. Mr. Kaul received a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from The George Washington University and a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Mr.Kaul has been inducted as a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Sandi L. KerentoffKerentoff..Ms. Kerentoff has served as our Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources since February 2012, following her appointment as head of Global Human Resources in October 2011. Ms. Kerentoff also has served as Senior Vice President, Administration and Human Resources of Hughes Network Systems, LLC since April 2000. Ms. Kerentoff joined Hughes Network Systems, LLC in 1977 and, from 1977 to 2000, held various positions of increasing responsibility. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from Michigan State University.
Kranti K. Kilaru.Roger J. Lynch. Mr. LynchKilaru has served as our Executive Vice President, AdvancedBusiness Systems, IT, and Operations since July 2013. Mr. Kilaru served as our Senior Vice President of our systems engineering group from April 2005 to July 2013 and was responsible for all broadcast centers, systems engineering, and global information technology infrastructure and operations. Mr. Kilaru joined EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. since November 2009. Mr. Lynch also serves as Executive Vice President, Advanced Technologies at DISH Network. Priorin 1989 and, from 1989 to joining EchoStar, Mr. Lynch served as Chairman and CEO2005, held various positions of Video Networks International, Ltd., an IPTV technology company in the United Kingdom from 2002 through 2009.increasing responsibility.
Dean A. MansonManson.. Mr. Manson has served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since November 2011, and is responsible for all legal and government affairs of EchoStar Corporation and its subsidiaries. Mr. Manson joined Hughes CommunicationsNetwork Systems, LLC in 2000 from the law firm of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, where he focused on international project finance and corporate transactions, and was appointed General Counsel of Hughes Communications in 2004. Mr. Manson received a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Princeton University and a Juris Doctorate from Columbia University School of Law.
Steven B. Schaver. Mr. Schaver has served as President of EchoStar International Corporation since April 2000. Mr. Schaver served as DISH Network’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from 1996 to 2000.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which any executive officer was selected as such. Pursuant to the Bylaws of EchoStar, executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition or results of operation could be materially and adversely affectedaffected.
.GENERAL RISKS AFFECTING OUR BUSINESS
General Risks Affecting Our Business
We currently derive a substantialsignificant portion of our revenue from our two primary customers,customer, DISH Network and Bell TV.Network. The loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from, or a decrease in selling prices of digital set-top boxes, transponder leasing, provision of digital broadcast services, broadband equipment and services and/or other products or services to DISH Network or Bell TV would significantly reduce our revenue and adversely impact our results of operations.
DISH Network accounted for 59.9%58.8%, 82.5%49.5% and 81.3%59.9% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009, respectively. Bell TV accounted for 7.9%, 8.6% and 10.5% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Any reduction in sales to DISH Network or Bell TV or in the prices they payit pays for the products and services they purchaseit purchases from us could have a significant negative impact on our business. In addition, because a significant portion of our revenue is derived from DISH Network, and Bell TV, our success also depends to a significant degree on the continued success of DISH Network and Bell TV in attracting new subscribers, and in marketing programming packages, and other services and features to subscribers that will requireresult in the purchase of new digital set-top boxes, and in particular, new digital set-top boxes at the high-end of our product range that incorporate high-definition, multiple tuners, and other advanced technology. If DISH Network’sNetwork's gross subscriber additions are adversely affected by the sustained economic weakness in the U.S., or for any other reason, we may experience a decline in our sales of digital set-top boxes to DISH Network. In addition, DISH Network has no obligations to continue to purchase our products and only certain obligations to continue to purchase certain of our services. Therefore, our relationship with DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed with little or no advance notice. Any material reduction in our sales to DISH Network would have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position.
As previously disclosed by DISH Network, in May 2012, Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against DISH Network Corporation and its Annual Report on Form 10-Kwholly owned subsidiary, DISH Network, L.L.C., in the U.S. District Court for the year ended December 31, 2011,Central District of California, alleging that certain services provided by DISH Network, experienced fewer gross subscriber additions during 2011. Therefore, it is possible thatincluding Slingbox functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their carriage contracts. An adverse decision against DISH Network will purchase fewer digitalcould decrease the number of Sling enabled set-top boxes and related components from us in the future than it purchased during the year ended December 31, 2011. This decrease could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, to the extent that DISH Network experiences fewer gross new subscriber additions, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related componentswe sell to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a further materialan adverse effectimpact on the business operations of our financial position and results of operations.
EchoStar Technologies segment.
In addition, the timing of orders for digital set-top boxes from these two customersDISH Network could vary significantly depending on equipment promotions these customers offeroffered to theirits subscribers, changes in technology, and theirits use of remanufactured digital set-top boxes, which may cause our revenue to vary significantly quarter over quarter and could expose us to the risks of inventory shortages or excess inventory. These inventory risks are particularly acute during product end-of-life transitions in which a new generation of digital set-top boxes is being deployed and inventory of older generation digital set-top boxes is at a higher risk of obsolescence. This in turn could cause our operating results to fluctuate significantly. Furthermore, because of the maturing and competitive nature of the digital set-top box business, the limited number of potential new customers, and the short-term nature of our purchase orders with DISH Network, and Bell TV, we could in the future experience downward pricing pressure on our digital set-top boxes sold to DISH Network, or Bell TV, which in turn would adversely affect our gross margins and profitability.
In addition, DISH Network is currently our primary customer of digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operation services. These products and services are provided pursuant to contracts that expire on December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Thereafter, if we are unable to extend those contracts on similar terms with DISH Network, or if we are otherwise unable to obtain
acceptable replacement contracts from third parties following a termination by DISH Network, there could be a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position.
There are a relatively small number of potential new customers for our digital set-top boxes, satellite services, and digital broadcast operations, and we expect this customer concentration to continue for the foreseeable future. If we lose DISH Network as a customer, it will be difficult for us to replace, in whole or in part, our historical revenue from DISH Network and we have had limited success in attracting such potential new customers in the past. Therefore, our operating results will likely continue to depend on sales to a relatively small number of customers, as well as the continued success of these customers. In addition, we may, from time to time, enter into customer agreements providing for exclusivity periods during which we may sell a specified product only to that customer. If we do not develop relationships with new customers, we may not be able to expand our customer base or maintain or increase our revenue.
Historically, many ofWe could face decreased demand and increased pricing pressure to our potential customers have perceived us as a competitorproducts and services due to our affiliation with DISH Network. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in entering into any commercial relationships with potential customers who are competitors of DISH Network (particularly if we continue to be perceived as affiliated with DISH Networkcompetition.
Economic weakness, including high unemployment and reduced consumer spending, may adversely affect our ability to grow or maintain our business.
A substantial portion of our revenue comes from providers of pay-TV services that in turn derive a substantial majority of their revenue from residential customers whose spending is affected by economic uncertainty. Our business also depends on the economic health and willingness of our customers and potential customers to make and adhere to capital and financial commitments to purchase our products and services. The U.S. and world economy experiencedpricing. Currently, there are many significant slowdown and other weaknessescompetitors in the past few years, and the economic environment may continueset-top box business including several established companies who have sold set-top boxes to be unfavorablemajor cable operators in the future.
Our abilityU.S. for many years. These competitors include Arris, Cisco, PACE, Samsung, and Technicolor. In addition, a number of rapidly growing companies have recently entered the market, many of them with set-top box offerings similar to grow or maintain our business may be adversely affected by sustained economic weakness, includingexisting satellite set-top box products. We also expect additional competition in the effectfuture from new and existing companies that do not currently compete in the market for set-top boxes. The entry of wavering consumer confidence, high unemployment and other factors that may adversely affect our EchoStar Technologies segment and providers of pay-TV services and the telecommunications industry. In particular, the weak economic conditionsthese new competitors may result in the following:
·Decreased Demand and Increased Pricing Pressure. Subscribers to pay-TV services may delay purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate their discretionary spending, which may in turn decrease demand for programming packages from pay-TV providers that include set-top box equipment manufactured by us. Increased pricing pressures may result in reduced margins for pay-TV providers, including DISH Network and Bell TV and may reduce demand for high-end digital set top boxes on which we earn higher gross margins. Furthermore, pay-TV providers may increasingly look to make purchases from foreign set-top box suppliers primarily located in Asia with lower-priced products as their customers become more cost-sensitive in making purchase decisions as a result of weak economic conditions. In addition, the telecommunications industry has been facing significant challenges resulting from excess capacity, new technologies and intense price competition. If the U.S. and world economic conditions continue to be volatile or deteriorate further or if the telecommunications industry experiences future weakness, we could experience reduced demand for, andincreased pricing pressure on, our products and services, which could lead to a reduction in our revenues and adversely affectthe market. If market prices are substantially reduced, our business, financial condition and results of operations.
·Excess Inventories and Satellite Capacity. There is an increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories as a result of possible lower demand for pay-TV services and the resultant lower demand for digital set-top boxes from pay-TV providers. We may also have excess satellite capacity resulting from possible decreased demand for pay-TV services and other services utilizing satellite transmission.
·Increased Impairment Charges. Sustained economic weakness could result in substantial future impairment charges relating to, among other things, satellites, FCC authorizations, goodwill and intangibles, and our debt and equity investments.
If we are unable to properly respond to technological changes, our business could be significantly harmed.
Our business and the market in which we operate are characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and frequent product and service introductions and enhancements. If we are unable to properly respond to or keep pace with technological developments, or fail to develop new technologies, our existing products and services may become obsolete and demand for our products and services may decline. Even if we keep up with technological innovation, we may not meet the demands of the network communications market. If we are unable to respond to or keep pace with technological advances on a cost-effective and timely basis, or if our products, applications or services are not accepted by the market, then our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
For instance, there is increasing demand for the delivery of digital video services via the Internet. If this increasing demand, along with other changes in technology leads pay-TV subscribers to use devices such as personal computers, Internet ready televisions, blu-ray players or gaming consoles, instead of set-top boxes, to receive their pay-TV services, our customers may not need to purchase our digital set-top boxes to provide their subscribers with their pay-TV services. Our competitors may also introduce technologies that compete favorably with our digital set-top boxes or that cause our digital set-top boxes to no longer be of significant benefit to our customers.
We and our suppliers may not be able to keep pace with technological developments. If we fail to timely obtain such technologies from our suppliers or introduce products and services with superior technologies, if the new technologies developed by us or our partners fail to achieve sustained acceptance in the marketplace or become obsolete, or if our competitors obtain or develop proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior to ours, we could suffer a material adverse effect on our future competitive position that could in turn decrease our revenues and earnings. Furthermore, after we have incurred substantial research and development costs, one or more of the technologies under our development, or under development by one or more of our strategic partners, could become obsolete prior to its introduction. Even if we keep up with technological innovation, we may not meet market demands.
Our response to technological developments depends, to a significant degree, on the work of technically skilled employees. Competition for the services of such employees is intense. Although we strive to attract and retain these employees, we may not succeed in this respect.
Certain of our sales to DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed on short notice, which would have a detrimental effect on us.
DISH Network has no obligations to continue to purchase our products and only certain obligations to continue to purchase certain of our services. Therefore, our relationship with DISH Network could be terminated or substantially curtailed with little or no advance notice. Any material reduction in our sales to DISH Network would have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.
Furthermore, if we lose DISH Network as a customer, it will be difficult for us to replace, in whole or in part, our historical revenues from DISH Network because there are a relatively small number of potential customers for our products and services, and we have had limited success in attracting such potential customers in the past.
We may be required to raise and refinance indebtedness during unfavorable market conditions.
We may need to raise additional debt in order to fund ongoing operations or to capitalize on our business opportunities. Recent developments in the financial markets have made it more difficult for issuers of high yield indebtedness such as us to access capital markets at reasonable rates. Currently, we have not been materially impacted by events in the current credit market. However, we cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we will be impacted in the future by the current conditions which may adversely affect our ability to secure additional financing to support our growth initiatives.
In addition, weakness in the financial markets could make it difficult for us to access capital markets at acceptable terms or at all. Instability in the equity markets could make it difficult for us to raise equity financing without incurring substantial dilution to our existing shareholders.affected. In particular, it may be difficult for us to raise debt financingmake profitable sales in international markets where these new competitors are present and in which we have not previously made sales of set-top boxes. As the set-top box business evolves, our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including software and hardware companies that could acquire significant market share, which could adversely affect our business. We also face competition from set-top boxes that have been internally developed by digital video providers. If we do not distinguish our products, particularly our retail products, through distinctive, technologically advanced features and design, as well as build and strengthen our brand recognition, our business could be harmed as we may not be able to effectively compete on price alone against new low cost market entrants. Any of these competitive threats, alone or in combination with others, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Furthermore, our customers face competition from providers of digital media, including companies that offer online services distributing movies, television shows and other video programming. As technologies develop, other means of delivering information and entertainment to television viewers are evolving. To the extent that these technologies compete successfully against our customers for viewers, the ability of our existing customer base to attract and retain subscribers may be adversely affected. As a result, demand for our satellite television digital set-top boxes could decline and we may not be able to sustain our current revenue levels.
relationships with our competitors. In addition, the supply of satellite capacity available in the market has increased in recent years, which makes it more difficult for us to sell our services in certain markets and to price our capacity at acceptable levels. Competition may cause downward pressure on prices and further reduce the utilization of our fleet capacity, both of which could have an adverse effect on our financial performance. Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment also competes with fiber optic cable and other terrestrial delivery systems, which may have a cost advantage, particularly in point-to-point applications where such delivery systems have been installed.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes have been decreasing and may decrease even further, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes have been decreasing and may decrease even further due to, among other things, an increase in the sales of lower-priced digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and increased competitive pricing pressure. Furthermore, our ability to increase the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes is limited and our average selling price may decrease even further in response to competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors, lack of demand for our new product introductions or other factors. If we are unable to increase or at least maintain the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes, or if such selling prices further decline, and we are unable to respond in a timely manner by developing and introducing new products and continually reducing our product costs, our revenue and gross margin may be negatively affected, which will harm our financial position and results of operations.
acceptable terms. In addition, sustained economic weakness may limit our abilityIf significant numbers of television viewers are unwilling to generate sufficient internal cash to fund investments, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other strategic transactions. We cannot predict with any certainty whether or notpay for pay-TV services that utilize digital set-top boxes, we will be impacted by sustained economic weakness. As a result, these conditions make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.
We may experience significant financial losses on our existing investments.
We have entered into certain strategic transactions and investments in North and South America, Asia and elsewhere. These investments involve a high degree of risk and could diminish our ability to fund our stock buyback program, invest capital in our business or return capital to our shareholders. The overall sustained economic uncertainty, as well as financial, operational and other difficulties encountered by certain companies in which we have invested increases the risk that the actual amounts realized in the future on our debt and equity investments will differ significantly from the fair values currently assigned to them. These investments could also expose us to significant financial losses and may restrict our ability to make other investments or limit alternative uses of our capital resources. In particular, the laws, regulations and practices of certain countries may make it harder for our international investments to be successful. If our investments suffer losses, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the companies in which we invest or with whom we partner may not be able to compete effectively or theresustain our current revenue level.
We are substantially dependent upon the ability of our customers to promote the delivery of pay-TV services, including, among others, premium programming packages and services that utilize technology incorporated into our digital set-top boxes, such as HD technology and IPTV, to generate future revenue.
However, our customers may be insufficientunsuccessful in promoting value-added services or may promote alternative packages, such as free programming packages, in lieu of promoting packages that utilize our high-end digital set-top box offerings. If our customers are unable to develop and effectively market compelling reasons for their subscribers to continue to purchase their pay-TV services that utilize our more advanced digital set-top boxes, it will be difficult for us to sustain our historical revenue. This risk is exacerbated by the sustained economic weakness under which consumers become more cost-sensitive in their discretionary spending and by increasing consumer demand for online platforms that provide for the servicesdistribution and products offered by these companies.viewing of video programming that competes with our customers' pay-TV services.
We may pursue acquisitionshave unused satellite capacity in our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, and other strategic transactionsour results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are not able to complement or expandlease this capacity to third parties, including DISH Network.
We currently have unused satellite capacity in our business, which may not be successful andEchoStar Satellite Services segment. While we may lose upare currently evaluating various opportunities to the entire valuemake profitable use of our investment in these acquisitions and transactions.
Our future success may depend on the existence of, and our ability to capitalize on, opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies or partner with other companies that could complement, enhance or expand our current business or products or that may otherwise offer us growth opportunities. We may pursue acquisitions, joint ventures or other business combination activities to complement or expand our business. In addition, we have entered, and may continue to enter, into strategic transactions and investments in North America, Asia and elsewhere. Any such acquisitions, transactions or investments that we are able to identify and complete which may become substantial over time, involve a high degree of risks, including,satellite capacity (including, but not limited to, the following:
·the diversionsupplying satellite capacity for new international ventures), we do not have firm plans to utilize all of our management’s attention from our existingsatellite capacity. There can be no assurance that we can successfully develop the business opportunities we currently plan to integrate the operations and personnel of the acquired or combined business or joint venture;
·possible adverse effects on our operating results during the integration process;
·exposurepursue to significant financial losses if the transactions and/or the underlying ventures are not successful; and/orutilize this capacity. If we are unable to achievelease our satellite capacity to third parties, including DISH Network, our margins could be negatively impacted and we may be required to record impairments related to our satellites.
The failure to adequately anticipate the intended objectives of the transaction;
·need for satellite capacity or the inability to obtain in the anticipated time frame, or at all, any regulatory approvals required to complete proposed acquisitions, transactions or investments; andsatellite capacity for our Hughes segment could harm our results of operations.
·the risks associated with complying with regulations applicable to the acquired business which may cause us to incurOur Hughes segment has made substantial expenses.
New acquisitions, joint ventures and other transactions may require the commitment of significant capital that may otherwise be directed to investments incontractual commitments for satellite capacity based on our existing businesses or be distributed to shareholders. Commitment of this capital may cause us to defer or suspend any share repurchases or capital expenditures that we otherwise may have made.
We have madecustomer contracts and will continue to make significant investments in research, development, and marketing for new products, services and related technologies,backlog, as well as entry intoanticipated future business, to the extent our existing broadband customers are not expected to utilize our SPACEWAY 3 or EchoStar XVII satellites. If future demand does not meet our expectations, we will be committed to maintaining excess satellite capacity for which we will have insufficient revenue to cover our costs, which would have a negative impact on our margins and results of operations. We have satellite capacity commitments for Ku-band frequencies, generally for two to five year terms, with third parties to cover different geographical areas or support different applications and features; therefore, we may not be able to quickly or easily adjust our capacity to changes in demand. If we only purchase satellite capacity based on existing contracts and bookings, capacity for certain types of coverage in the future may not be readily served or available to us, and we may not be able to satisfy certain needs of our customers, which could result in a loss of possible new business areas. Investmentsand could negatively impact the margins earned for those services. At present, until the launch and operation of additional satellites, there is limited availability of capacity on the Ku-band frequencies in new technologiesNorth America. In addition, the FSS industry has seen consolidation in the past decade, and business areas are inherently speculativetoday, the main FSS providers in North America and commercial success thereof depends on numerous factors including innovativeness, quality of service and support, and effectiveness of sales and marketing. We may not achieve revenue or profitability from such investments for a number of years, ifsmaller regional providers own and operate the current satellites that are available for our capacity needs. The failure of any of these FSS providers to replace existing satellite assets at all. Moreover, even if such products, services, technologies and business area become profitable,the end of their operating margins may be minimal.useful lives or a downturn in their industry as a whole could reduce or interrupt the Ku-band capacity available to us. If we are not able to renew our capacity leases at economically viable rates, or
if capacity is not available due to any problems of the FSS providers, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We are dependent upon third-party providers for components, manufacturing, installation services, and customer support services, and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected if any of these third-party providers fail to appropriately deliver the contracted goods or services.
We are dependent upon third-party services and products provided to us, including the following:
Our foreign operations expose us to regulatory risks and restrictions not present in our domestic operations.
Our operations outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 14.1%, 23.0% and 19.3% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Collectively, we expect our foreign operations to continue to represent a significant portion of our business. We have operations in Brazil, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, the Russian Federation, the United Arab Emirates, Ireland and the United Kingdom, among other nations. Over the last 10 years, we have sold products in over 100 countries. Our foreign operations involve varying degrees of risk and uncertainties inherent in doing business abroad. Such risks include:
repatriation of earnings to the U.S. from our subsidiaries and joint venture entities. Applicable law in such foreign countries may also limit our ability to distribute or access our assets in certain circumstances. In such event, we will not have access to the cash flow and assets of our joint ventures.
We,
Our international sales and operations are subject to applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations.other countries
We must comply with foreign national requirements for the registration of satellites and associated obligations. We may not be aware of the laws for new markets in which we intend to conduct business. Furthermore, for those countries in which we are presently conducting business, the requirements relating to satellite registration and satellite services could be changed. Non-compliance with these requirements may result in the loss of the authorizations and licenses to conduct business in these countries.
Violations of these laws or regulations could result in significant sanctions including fines, more onerous compliance requirements, debarments from export privileges or loss of authorizations needed to conduct aspects of our international business. A violation of ITAR or the other regulations enumerated above could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may experience significant financial losses on our existing investments.
We have entered into certain strategic transactions and investments in North and South America, Asia and elsewhere. These investments involve a high degree of risk and could diminish our ability to fund a share repurchase program, invest capital in our business or return capital to our shareholders. The overall sustained economic uncertainty, as well as financial, operational and other difficulties encountered by certain companies in which we have invested increases the risk that the actual amounts realized in the future on our debt and equity investments will differ significantly from the fair values currently assigned to them. These investments could also expose us to significant financial losses and may restrict our ability to make other investments or limit alternative uses of our capital resources. If our investments suffer losses, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, the companies in which we invest or with whom we partner may not be able to compete effectively or there may be insufficient demand for the services and products offered by these companies.
We may pursue acquisitions and other strategic transactions to complement or expand our business, which may not be successful and we may lose a portion or all of our investment in these acquisitions and transactions.
Our future success may depend on the existence of, and our ability to capitalize on, opportunities to acquire other businesses or technologies or partner with other companies that could complement,
enhance or expand our current business or products or that may otherwise offer us growth opportunities. We may pursue acquisitions, joint ventures or other business combination activities to complement or expand our business. Any such acquisitions, transactions or investments that we are able to identify and complete which may become substantial over time, involve a high degree of risk, including, but not limited to, the following:
New acquisitions, joint ventures and other transactions may require the commitment of significant capital that may otherwise be directed to investments in our existing businesses or be distributed to shareholders. Commitment of this capital may cause us to defer or suspend any share repurchases or capital expenditures that we otherwise may have made.
We have made and will continue to make significant investments in research, development, and marketing for new products, services and related technologies, as well as entry into new business areas. Investments in new technologies and business areas are inherently speculative and commercial success thereof depends on numerous factors including innovativeness, quality of service and support, and effectiveness of sales and marketing. We may not achieve revenue or profitability from such investments for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, even if such products, services, technologies and business area become profitable, their operating margins may be minimal.
We may not be able to generate cash to meet our debt service needs or fund our operations.
Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation ("HSS"), our wholly owned subsidiary that, together with its subsidiaries, operates our Hughes segment and our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, has incurred significant indebtedness. HSS currently has outstanding $1.10 billion of senior secured notes (the "Secured Notes") and $900.0 million of senior unsecured notes (the "Unsecured Notes" and, together with the Secured Notes, the "Notes"). HSS' ability to make payments on or to refinance its indebtedness and to fund its operations will depend on its ability to generate cash in the future, which is subject in part to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. HSS may need to raise additional debt in order to fund ongoing operations or to capitalize on business opportunities. HSS may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available in amounts sufficient to enable HSS to service its indebtedness or to fund its operations or other liquidity needs. If HSS is unable to generate sufficient cash, it may be forced to take actions such as revising or delaying its strategic plans, reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing its debt or seeking additional equity capital. HSS may not be able to affect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms, or at all. The indentures governing the Notes also limit HSS' ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from such dispositions. Therefore, HSS may not be able to consummate those dispositions on satisfactory terms, or at all, or to use those proceeds in a manner it may otherwise prefer.
In addition, weakness in the financial markets could make it difficult for us to access capital markets at acceptable terms or at all. Instability in the equity markets could make it difficult for us to raise equity financing without incurring substantial dilution to our existing shareholders. In addition, sustained
economic weakness may limit our ability to generate sufficient internal cash to fund investments, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other strategic transactions. We cannot predict with any certainty whether or not we arewill be impacted by sustained economic weakness. As a result, these conditions make it difficult for us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities because we may not have access to funding sources necessary for us to pursue organic and strategic business development opportunities.
Covenants in HSS' indentures restrict its business in many ways.
The indentures governing the Notes contain various covenants, subject to certain exceptions, that limit HSS' ability and/or its restricted subsidiaries' ability to, among other things:
Failure to give anything of value to foreign officials and other individuals for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining a competitive advantage. Our policies mandate compliancecomply with these laws. However, we operateand certain other financial covenants, if not cured or waived, may result in many partsan event of default under the world that have experienced corruption to some degree. If we are found to be liable for violating these laws, we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions,indentures, which could have a material adverse impacteffect on HSS' business or prospects. If an event of default occurs and is continuing under the respective indenture, the trustee under that indenture or the requisite holders of the Notes under that indenture may declare all such Notes to be immediately due and payable and, in the case of the indenture governing the Secured Notes, could proceed against the collateral that secures the Secured Notes. HSS and certain of its subsidiaries have pledged a significant portion of their assets as collateral under the indenture governing the Secured Notes. If HSS does not have enough cash to service its debt or fund other liquidity needs, it may be required to take actions such as requesting a waiver from the holders of the Notes, reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing all or part of the existing debt, or seeking additional equity capital. We cannot assure you that any of these remedies can be effected on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.
We believe that our future success will depend to a significant extent upon the performance of Mr. Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and certain other key executives. The loss of Mr. Ergen or of certain other key executives or the ability of Mr. Ergen or certain other key executives to devote sufficient time and effort to our business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although all of our executives have agreements limiting their ability to work for or consult with competitors if they leave us, we generally do not have employment agreements with them. To the extent Mr. Ergen or other officers are performing services to both DISH Network and us, their attention may be diverted away from our business and therefore adversely affect our business.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR SATELLITES
Our owned and leased satellites in orbit are subject to significant operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
Satellites are subject to significant operational risks while in orbit. These risks include malfunctions, commonly referred to as anomalies, which have occurred and may occur in the future in our satellites and the satellites of other operators as a result of various factors, such as satellite design and manufacturing defects, problems with the power systems or control systems of the satellites and general failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh environment of space.
Although we work closely with the satellite manufacturers to determine and eliminate the cause of anomalies in new satellites and provide for redundancies of many critical components in the satellites, we may not be able to prevent anomalies from occurring and may experience anomalies in the future, whether of the types described above or arising from the failure of other systems or components.
Any single anomaly or series of anomalies could materially and adversely affect our ability to utilize the satellite, our operations and revenue as well as our relationship with current customers and our ability to attract new customers. In particular, future anomalies may result in the loss of individual transponders on a satellite, a group of transponders on that satellite or the entire satellite, depending on the nature of the anomaly. Anomalies may also reduce the expected capacity or useful life of a satellite, thereby reducing the revenue that could be generated by that satellite, or create additional expenses due to the need to provide replacement or back-up satellites or satellite capacity.
Meteoroid events pose a potential threat to all in-orbit satellites. The probability that meteoroids will damage those satellites increases significantly when the Earth passes through the particulate stream left behind by comets. Occasionally, increased solar activity also poses a potential threat to all in-orbit satellites.
Some decommissioned spacecraft are in uncontrolled orbits, which pass through the geostationary belt at various points and present hazards to operational spacecraft, including our satellites. We may be required to perform maneuvers to avoid collisions and these maneuvers may prove unsuccessful or could reduce the useful life of the satellite through the expenditure of fuel to perform these maneuvers. The loss, damage or destruction of any of our satellites as a result of an electrostatic storm, collision with space debris, malfunction or other event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our satellites have minimum design lives ranging from 12 to 15 years, but could fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.
Generally, the minimum design life of each of our satellites ranges from 12 to 15 years. We can provide no assurance, however, as to the actual operational lives of our satellites, which may be shorter than their design lives. Our ability to earn revenue depends on the continued operation of our satellites, each of which has a limited useful life. A number of factors affect the useful lives of the satellites, including, among other things, the quality of their design and construction, the durability of their component parts, the ability to continue to maintain proper orbit and control over the satellite's functions, the efficiency of the launch vehicle used, and the remaining on-board fuel following orbit insertion.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may relocate another satellite and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost satellite, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such a relocation would require FCC approval and, among other things, a showing to the FCC that the replacement satellite would not cause additional interference compared to the failed or lost satellite. We cannot be certain that we could obtain such FCC approval. In addition, we cannot guarantee that another satellite will be available for
use as a replacement for a failed or lost satellite, or that such relocation can be accomplished without a substantial utilization of fuel. Any such utilization of fuel would reduce the operational life of the replacement satellite.
Our satellites under construction are subject to risks related to construction and launch that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
Satellite construction and launch are subject to significant risks, including delays, launch failure and incorrect orbital placement. Certain launch vehicles that may be used by us have either unproven track records or have experienced launch failures in the past. The risks of launch delay and failure are usually greater when the launch vehicle does not have a track record of previous successful flights. Launch failures result in significant delays in the deployment of satellites because of the need both to construct replacement satellites, which can take more than three years, and to obtain other launch opportunities. Construction and launch delays could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenue. Historically, we generally have not carried launch insurance on our satellites; if a launch failure were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to fund future satellite procurement and launch opportunities. In addition, the occurrence of launch failures, whether on our satellites or those of others may significantly reduce the availability of launch insurance on our satellites or make launch insurance premiums uneconomical.
We generally do not have commercial insurance coverage on the satellites we use and could face significant impairment charges if one of our uninsured satellites fails.
We generally do not carry in-orbit insurance on any of our satellites, other than SPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVI and EchoStar XVII, and often do not use commercial insurance to mitigate the potential financial impact of launch or in-orbit failures because we believe that the cost of insurance premiums is uneconomical relative to the risk of such failures. If one or more of our in-orbit uninsured satellites fail, we could be required to record significant impairment charges.
Our use of certain satellites is often dependent on satellite coordination agreements, which may be difficult to obtain.
Satellite transmissions and the use of frequencies often are dependent on coordination with other satellite systems operated by U.S. or foreign satellite operators, and it can be difficult to determine the outcome of these coordination agreements with these other entities and governments. The impact of a coordination agreement may result in the loss of rights to the use of certain frequencies or access to certain markets. The significance of such a loss would vary and it can therefore be difficult to determine which portion of our revenue will be impacted.
Furthermore, the satellite coordination process is conducted under the guidance of the ITU radio regulations and the national regulations of the satellites involved in the coordination process. These rules and regulations could be amended and could therefore materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our dependence on outside contractors could result in delays related to the design, manufacture and launch of our new satellites, which could in turn adversely affect our operating results.
There are a limited number of manufacturers that are able to design and build satellites according to the technical specifications and standards of quality we require, including Airbus Defense and Space, Boeing Satellite Systems, Lockheed Martin, Space Systems Loral ("SS/L") and Thales Alenia Space. There are also a limited number of launch service providers that are able to launch such satellites, including International Launch Services, Arianespace, United Launch Alliance, ADD Space Exploration and Sea Launch Company. The loss of any of our manufacturers or launch service
providers could increase the cost and result in the delay of the design, construction or launch of our satellites. Even if alternate suppliers for such services are available, we may have difficulty identifying them in a timely manner or we may incur significant additional expense in changing suppliers, and this could result in difficulties or delays in the design, construction or launch of our satellites. Any delays in the design, construction or launch of our satellites could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY
If we are unable to properly respond to technological changes, our business could be significantly harmed.
Our business and the markets in which we operate are characterized by rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and frequent product and service introductions and enhancements. If we or our suppliers are unable to properly respond to or keep pace with technological developments, fail to develop new technologies, or if our competitors obtain or develop proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior to ours, our existing products and services may become obsolete and demand for our products and services may decline. Even if we keep up with technological innovation, we may not meet the demands of the markets we serve. Furthermore, after we have incurred substantial research and development costs, one or more of the technologies under our development, or under development by one or more of our strategic partners, could become obsolete prior to its introduction. If we are unable to respond to or keep pace with technological advances on a cost-effective and timely basis, or if our products, applications or services are not accepted by the market, then our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our response to technological developments depends, to a significant degree, on the work of technically skilled employees. Competition for the services of such employees is intense. Although we strive to attract and retain these employees, we may not succeed in this respect.
Our future growth depends on growing demand for advanced technologies.
Future demand for our digital set-top boxes will depend significantly on the growing demand for advanced technologies, such as HDTV, 3D TV, a whole-home HD DVR and broadband internet connectivity. The effective delivery of advanced technologies, such as HDTV and 3D TV, will depend on digital television operators developing and building infrastructure to provide widespread HDTV and 3D TV programming. If the deployment of, or demand for, advanced technologies, such as HDTV, 3D TV, a whole-home HD DVR and broadband internet connectivity, is not as widespread or as rapid as we or our customers expect, our revenue growth will be limited.
Our business depends on certain intellectual property rights and on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others. The loss of or infringement of our intellectual property rights or our infringement of the intellectual property rights of others could have a significant adverse impact on our business.
We rely on our patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets, as well as licenses and other agreements with our vendors and other parties, to use our technologies, conduct our operations and sell our products and services. Legal challenges to our intellectual property rights and claims by third parties of intellectual property infringement could require that we enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, incur substantial monetary liability or be enjoined preliminarily or permanently from further use of the intellectual property in question or from the continuation of our businesses as currently conducted, which could require us to change our business practices or limit our ability to compete effectively or could otherwise have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Even
if we believe any such challenges or claims are without merit, they can be time-consuming and costly to defend and may divert management’smanagement's attention and resources away from our business.
Moreover, due to the rapid pace of technological change, we rely in part on technologies developed or licensed by third parties, and if we are unable to obtain or continue to obtain licenses or other required intellectual property rights from these third parties on reasonable terms, our business, financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected. Technology licensed from third parties may have undetected errors that impair the functionality or prevent the successful integration of our products or services. As a result of any such changes or loss, we may need to incur additional development costs to ensure continued performance of our products or suffer delays until replacement technology, if available, can be obtained and integrated.
In addition, we work with third parties such as vendors, contractors and suppliers for the development and manufacture of components that are integrated into our products and our products may contain technologies provided to us by these third parties. We may have little or no ability to determine in advance whether any such technology infringes the intellectual property rights of others. Our vendors, contractors and suppliers may not be required to indemnify us in the event that a claim of infringement is asserted against us, or they may be required to indemnify us only up to a maximum amount, above which we would be responsible for any further costs or damages. Legal challenges to these intellectual property rights may impair our ability to use the products and technologies that we need in order to operate our business and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, in February 2012 and September 2013, ViaSat and its subsidiary ViaSat Communications filed a lawsuitlawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Space Systems Loral (“SS/L”),L, the manufacturer of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, our next generation satellite currently under construction.XVII and EchoStar XIX. ViaSat alleges, among other things, that SS/L infringes foursix different patents, and has breached its contractual obligations through the use of such patented technology to manufacture EchoStar XVII/JupiterXVII, EchoStar XIX and other satellites. While we are not a named party to this matter, an adverse decision against SS/L could have a significant impact on our business operations and impair our ability to make use of the EchoStar XVII/Jupiter satelliteXVII, EchoStar XIX, or use the satelliteother satellites from SS/L.
We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided, could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the timeframeordinary course of our business. Many entities, including some of our competitors, have or may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services related to those that we have anticipated.offer. In general, if a court determines that one or more of our products or services infringes valid intellectual property rights held by others, we may be required to cease developing or marketing those products or services, to obtain licenses from the holders of the intellectual property at a material cost, or to redesign those products or services in such a way as to avoid infringement. If those intellectual property rights are held by a competitor, we may be unable to license the necessary intellectual property rights at any price, which could adversely affect our competitive position. Please see further discussion under Item 1. Business—Patents and Trademarks and Item 3. Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If the encryption and related security technology used in our digital set-top boxes is compromised, sales of our digital set-top boxes may decline.
Our customers use encryption and related security technology obtained from us or our suppliers in the digital set-top boxes that they purchase from us to control access to their programming content. Such encryption and related security technology has been compromised in the past and may be compromised in the future even though we continue to respond with significant investment in security measures, such as updates in security software, that are intended to make signal theft more difficult. It has been our prior experience that security measures may only be effective for short periods of time or not at all. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in reducing or controlling theft of our customers' programming
content. As a result, sales of our digital set-top boxes may decline and we may incur additional costs in the future if security of our customers' system is compromised.
We rely on network and information systems and other technologies and a disruption, cyber-attack, failure or inadequacydestruction of our information technology infrastructuresuch networks, systems or those of our third-party service providers couldtechnologies may disrupt or harm our business.
The capacity, reliability and security of our information technology hardware and software infrastructure are important to the operation of our current business, which would suffer in the event of system failures. Likewise, our ability to expand and update our information technology infrastructure in response to our growth and changing needs is important to the continued implementationdisruptions or failures, such as computer hackings, cyber-attacks, computer viruses, worms or other destructive or disruptive software, process breakdowns, denial of our new service offering initiatives.attacks or other malicious activities. Our networks and those of our third-party service providers and our customers may be vulnerable to these attacks and unauthorized access, computer viruses and other security problems.access. Persons who circumvent security measures could wrongfully obtain or use information on the network or cause interruptions, delays or malfunctions in our operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may be required to expend significant resources to protect against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems, including reputational harm and litigation, caused by any breaches. Although we have implemented and intend to continue to implement industry-standard security measures, these measures may prove to be inadequate and result in system failures and delays that could lower network operations center availability and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition,Likewise, our ability to expand and update our information technology infrastructure in response to our growth and changing needs is important to the continued implementation of our new service offering initiatives. Our inability to expand or upgrade our technology infrastructure could have adverse consequences, which could include the delayed implementation of new offerings, product or service interruptions, and the diversion of development resources.
We are party to various lawsuits which, if adversely decided,If our products contain defects, we could have a significant adverse impact on our business, particularly lawsuits regarding intellectual property.
We arebe subject to various legal proceedingssignificant costs to correct such defects and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Many entities, including some of our competitors, haveproduct and network service contracts could be delayed or may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services related to those that we offer. In general, if a court determines that one or more of our products or services infringes valid intellectual property rights held by others, we may be required to cease developing or marketing those products or services, to obtain licenses from the holders of the intellectual property at a material cost, or to redesign those products or services in such a way as to avoid infringement. If those intellectual property rights are held by a competitor, we may be unable to license the
necessary intellectual property rights at any price,cancelled, which could adversely affect our competitive position. Please see further discussion under Item 1. Business — Patents and Trademarks of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.revenue.
We have not been an independent company for a significant amount of time and we may be unable to make, on a timely or cost-effective basis, the changes necessary to operate as an independent company.
Prior to our Spin-off from DISH Network, our business was operated by DISH Network as part of its broader corporate organization, rather than as an independent company. DISH Network’s senior management oversaw the strategic direction of our businesses and DISH Network performed various corporate functions for us, including, but not limited to:
· human resources related functions;
· accounting;
· tax administration;
· legal and external reporting;
· treasury administration, investor relations, internal audit and insurance functions; and
· information technology and telecommunications services.
DISH Network and its affiliates are currently obligated to provide certain of these functions to us pursuant to the management services agreementThe products and the professional services agreement between us and DISH Network. See Note 17 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. If DISH Network does not continue to perform effectively the services that are called for under the management services agreement and the professional services agreement,networks we may not be able to operate our business effectively. In addition if, once the management services agreement and the professional services agreement terminate, we do not have in place our own systems and business functions, we do not have agreements with other providers of these services or we are not able to make these changes cost-effectively, we may not be able to operate our business effectively and our profitability may decline.
We rely on key personnel and the loss of their services may negatively affect our businesses.
We believe that our future success will depend to a significant extent upon the performance of Mr. Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and certain other key executives. The loss of Mr. Ergen or of certain other key executives or the ability of Mr. Ergen or certain other key executives to devote sufficient time and effort to our business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Although all of our executives have certain agreements limiting their ability to work for or consult with competitors if they leave us, we generally do not have employment agreements with them. Paul W. Orban, our Controller, provides services to us pursuant to a management services agreement with DISH Network. In addition, Roger J. Lynch also serves as Executive Vice President, Advanced Technologies of DISH Network. To the extent these and other officers are performing services to both DISH Network and us, their attention may be diverted away from our business and therefore adversely affect our business.
We have substantial debt outstanding and may incur additional debt.
As of December 31, 2011, our total debt, including the debt of our subsidiaries, was approximately $2.534 billion. Our debt levels could have significant consequences, including:
·making it more difficult to satisfy our obligations;
·having a dilutive effect on our outstanding equity capital or future earnings;
·increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions, including changes in interest rates;
·limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
·requiring us to devote a substantial portion of our available cash and cash flow to make interest and principal payments on our debt, thereby reducing the amount of available cash for other purposes;
·limiting our financial and operating flexibility in responding to changing economic and competitive conditions; and
·placing us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have relatively less debt.
In addition, we may incur substantial additional debt in the future. The terms of the indentures relating to our senior notes permit us to incur additional debt. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the risks we now face could intensify.
Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Technologies Segment
We depend on sales of digital set-top boxes for a substantial portion of our revenue and a decline in sales of our digital set-top boxes would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Our historical revenues consist primarily of sales of our digital set-top boxes. In addition, we currently derive, and expect to continue to derive in the near term, nearly all of our revenue from sales of our digital set-top boxes to DISH Network, Bell TV and Dish Mexico. If the sustained economic weakness persists, demand for digital set-top boxes from our three significant customers could decrease and, consequently, our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected. While we expect that DISH Network will continue to purchase digital set-top boxes and related components from us, DISH Network experienced fewer gross subscriber additions during 2011 which could result in DISH Network purchasing fewer digital set-top boxes and related components from us than it has purchased during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Our business may suffer if our customer base does not compete successfully with existing and emerging competition.
Our existing customers face competition from providers of digital media, including those companies that offer online services distributing movies, television shows and other video programming. As technologies develop, other means of delivering information and entertainment to television viewers are evolving. For example, online platforms that provide for the distribution and viewing of video programming compete with our customers’ pay-TV services. To the extent that these technologies compete successfully against our customers for viewers, the ability of our existing customer base to attract and retain subscribers may be adversely affected. As a result, demand for our satellite television digital set-top boxes could decline and we may not be able to sustain our current revenue levels.
Our future financial performance depends in part on our ability to penetrate new markets for digital set-top boxes.
Our products were initially designed for, and have been deployed mostly by, providers of satellite-delivered digital television. Our sales of digital set-top boxes to providers of digital television other than providers of satellite-delivered digital television have not been significant. The cable set-top box market is highly competitive and we expect competition to intensify in the future. In particular, we believe that most cable set-top boxes are sold by a small number of well entrenched competitors who have long-standing relationships with cable operators. This competition, and our perception by many potential customers as a competitor due to our affiliation with DISH Network, may make it more difficult for us to sell cable set-top boxes, and may result in pricing pressure, low profit
margins, high sales and marketing expenses and limited market share, any of which could, to a certain extent, adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
Component pricing may remain stable or be negatively affected by inflation, increased demand, decreased supply, or other factors, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
A substantial portion of our revenues are derived from the sale of digital set-top boxes. A significant portion of the production costs of digital set-top boxes relate to the purchase of electronic components, the costs of which have historically fallen over time. To the extent that component pricing does not decline or increases, whether due to inflation, increased demand, decreased supply or other factors, we may not be able to pass on the impact of increasing raw materials prices or labor and other costs, to our customers, and we may not be able to operate profitably. For example, we entered into a digital set-top box contract extension with Bell TV under which we supply digital set-top boxes to Bell TV at fixed prices over the duration of the contract. Under this fixed-price arrangement, we bear any risk of increased costs because we are not able to pass any increase in our component pricing on to Bell TV.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes has been decreasing and may decrease even further, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.
The average selling price and gross margins of our digital set-top boxes has been decreasing and may decrease even further due to, among other things, an increase in the sales of lower-priced digital set-top boxes to DISH Network and increased competitive pricing pressure Furthermore, our ability to increase the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes is limited and our average selling price may decrease even further in response to competitive pricing pressures, new product introductions by us or our competitors, lack of demand for our new product introductions or other factors. If we are unable to increase or at least maintain the average selling prices of our digital set-top boxes, or if such selling prices further decline, and we are unable to respond in a timely manner by developing and introducing new products and continually reducing our product costs, our revenues and gross margin may be negatively affected, which will harm our financial position and results of operations.
Our ability to sell our digital set-top boxes to other operators depends on our ability to obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems utilized by these other operators.
Our commercial success in selling our digital set-top boxes to cable television and other operators depends significantly on our ability to obtain licenses to use the conditional access systems deployed by these operators in our digital set-top boxes. In many cases, the intellectual property rights to these conditional access systems are owned by the set-top box manufacturer that currently provides the system operator with its set-top boxes. We cannot assure you that we will able to obtain required licenses on commercially favorable terms, or at all. If we do not obtain the necessary licenses, we may be delayed or prevented from pursuing the development of some potential products with cable or other television operators. Our failure to obtain a license to use the conditional access systems that we may require to develop or commercialize our digital set-top boxes with cable television or other operators, in turn, would harm our ability to grow our customer base and revenue.
Growth in our EchoStar Technologies segment likely requires expansion of our sales to international customers, and we may be unsuccessful in expanding international sales.
We believe that to grow our digital set-top box revenue and business and to build a large customer base, we must increase sales of our digital set-top boxes in international markets. We have had limited success in selling our digital set-top boxes internationally. To succeed in these sales efforts, we believe we must develop and manage new relationships with cable operators and other providers of digital television in international markets. If we do not succeed in our efforts to sell to these target markets and customers and deal with these challenges in our international operations, the size of our total addressable market may be limited. This, in turn, would harm our ability to grow our customer base and revenue.
If we are successful in growing sales of our digital set-top boxes to international customers, we may be subject to additional risks including, among other things, trade barriers and political instability abroad.
We may be subject to greater risks than our competitors as a result of international expansion. We could be harmed financially and operationally by tariffs, taxes and other trade barriers that may be imposed on our products or services, or by political and economic instability in the countries in which we sell our digital set-top boxes. If we ever need to pursue legal remedies against our customers or our business partners located outside of the U.S., it may be difficult for us to enforce our rights against them. Furthermore, we may be subject to currency risks with respect to payments from our international customers and our international customers may have difficulty obtaining U.S. currency and/or remitting payment due to currency exchange controls.
The digital set-top box industry is extremely competitive.
Currently, there are many significant competitors in the set-top box business including several established companies who have sold set-top boxes to major cable operators in the U.S. for many years. These competitors include Motorola Mobility, Cisco (which owns Scientific Atlanta), Pace and Technicolor. In addition, a number of rapidly growing companies have recently entered the market, many of them with set-top box offerings similar to our existing satellite set-top box products. We also expect additional competition in the future from new and existing companies that do not currently compete in the market for set-top boxes. As the set-top box business evolves, our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including software and hardware companies that could acquire significant market share, which could adversely affect our business. We also face competition from set-top boxes that have been internally developed by digital video providers. Any of these competitive threats, alone or in combination with others, could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
We expect to continue to face competition from new market entrants, principally located in Asia, that offer low cost set-top boxes.
The set-top box market is intensely competitive, and market leadership changes frequently as a result of new products, designs and pricing. We expect to face additional competition from companies, principally located in Asia, which offer low cost set-top boxes, including set-top boxes that are modeled after our products or products of our principal competitors. The entry of these new competitors may result in increased pricing pressure in the market. If market prices are substantially reduced by such new entrants, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In particular, it may be difficult for us to make profitable sales in international markets where these new competitors are present and in which we have not previously made sales of set-top boxes.
If we do not distinguish our products, particularly our retail products, through distinctive, technologically advanced features and design, as well as build and strengthen our brand recognition, our business could be harmed as we may not be able to effectively compete on price alone against new low cost market entrants that are principally located in Asia. If we do not otherwise compete effectively, demand for our products could decline, our gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, and our revenues and earnings could decline.
Our digital set-top boxesdeploy are highly complex, and some may experiencecontain defects when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released, despite testing and our quality or supply problems.
Our digitalcontrol procedures. For example, set-top boxes are highly complex and can have defects in design, manufacture or associated software. Set-top boxes may contain software “bugs”"bugs" that can unexpectedly interfere with their operation. Defects may also occur in components and products that we purchase from third-parties.third parties. In addition, many of our products and network services are designed to interface with our customers' existing networks, each of which has different specifications and utilize multiple protocol standards. Our products and services must interoperate with the other products and services within our customers' networks, as well as with future products and services that might be added to these networks, to meet our customers' requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect and fix all defects in the digital set-top boxes thatproducts and networks we sell. WeThe occurrence of any defects, errors or failures in our products or network services could incur significant expenses,result in: (i) additional costs to correct such defects; (ii) cancellation of orders and lost revenue; (iii) a reduction in revenue backlog; (iv) product returns or recalls; (v) diversion of our resources; (vi) the issuance of credits to customers and other losses to us, our customers or end-users; and (vii) harm to our reputation if we fail to detect or effectively address such issues through design, testing or warranty repairs. Any of these occurrences could also result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products and services and loss of sales, which would harm our reputation and our business and adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
If significant numbers of television viewers are unwilling to pay for pay-TV services that utilize digital set-top boxes, we may not be able to sustain our current revenue level.
We are substantially dependent upon the ability of our customers to promote the delivery of pay-TV services, including, among others, premium programming packages and services that utilize technology incorporated into our digital set-top boxes, such as HD technology and IPTV, to generate future revenues.
However, our customers may be unsuccessful in promoting value-added services or may promote alternative packages, such as free programming packages, in lieu of promoting packages that utilize our high-end digital set-top box offerings. If our customers are unable to develop and effectively market compelling reasons for their subscribers to continue to purchase their pay-TV services that utilize our more advanced digital set-top boxes, it will be difficult for us to sustain our historical revenues. This risk is exacerbated by the sustained economic weakness under which consumers become more cost-sensitive in their discretionary spending and by increasing consumer demand for online platforms that provide for the distribution and viewing of video programming that competes with our customers’ pay-TV services.
Our reliance on a single supplier or a limited number of suppliers for several components used in our digital set-top boxes could restrict production, result in higher digital set-top box costs and delay deliveries to customers.
We obtain many components for our digital set-top boxes from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Our reliance on a single or limited group of suppliers, particularly foreign suppliers, and our increasing reliance on subcontractors, involves several risks. These risks include a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components, and reduced control over pricing, quality, and timely delivery of these components. We do not generally maintain long-term agreements with any of our suppliers or subcontractors. An inability to obtain adequate deliveries or any other circumstances requiring us to seek alternative sources of supply could affect our ability to ship our digital set-top boxes on a timely basis, which could damage our relationships with current and prospective customers and harm our business, resulting in a loss of market share, and reduce revenues and income. For example, during 2011, several regions of Thailand experienced severe flooding, causing damage to infrastructure, housing and factories. Certain of our suppliers are located in Thailand. To the extent that component production has been affected, we have worked to obtain alternative sources of supply or implement other measures. Based on our current assessment of the situation, we do not believe this event will have a material impact on our set-top box supply; however, because the situation is still evolving, uncertainty remains regarding the ultimate impact of this event. Any product shortages and resulting installation delays could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
We generally maintain low inventory levels and do not make binding long-term commitments to suppliers. As a result, it may be difficult in the future to obtain components required for our products or to increase the volume of components if demand for our products increases.
The sustained economic weakness may cause certain suppliers that we rely on to cease operations which, in turn, may cause us to suffer disruptions to our supply chain or incur higher production costs.
Our future growth depends on growing demand for advanced technologies.
Future demand for our digital set-top boxes will depend significantly on the growing demand for advanced technologies, such as HDTV, 3D TV, a whole-home HD DVR and broadband Internet connectivity. The effective delivery of advanced technologies, such as HDTV and 3D TV, will depend on digital television operators developing and building infrastructure to provide widespread HDTV and 3D TV programming. If the deployment of, or demand for, advanced technologies, such as HDTV, 3D TV, a whole-home HD DVR and broadband Internet connectivity, is not as widespread or as rapid as we or our customers expect, our revenue growth will be limited.
Table of ContentsRISKS RELATED TO THE REGULATION OF OUR BUSINESS
If the encryption and related security technology used in our digital set-top boxes is compromised, sales of our digital set-top boxes may decline.
Our customers use encryption and related security technology obtained from us or our suppliers in the digital set-top boxes that they purchase from us to control access to their programming content. Such encryption and related security technology has been compromised in the past and may be compromised in the future even though we continue to respond with significant investment in security measures, such as updates in security software, that are intended to make signal theft more difficult. It has been our prior experience that security measures may only be effective for short periods of time or not at all. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in reducing or controlling theft of our customers’ programming content. As a result, sales of our digital set-top boxes may decline and we may incur additional costs in the future if security of our customers’ system is compromised.
Risks Affecting Our EchoStar Satellite Services and Hughes Segments
We currently face competition from established competitors in the satellite service business and may face competition from others in the future.
We compete against larger, well-established satellite service companies, such as Intelsat, SES S.A. and Telesat. Because the satellite services industry is relatively mature, our growth strategy depends largely on our ability to displace current incumbent providers, which often have the benefit of long-term contracts with customers. These long-term contracts and other factors result in relatively high costs for customers to change service providers, making it more difficult for us to displace customers from their current relationships with our competitors. In addition, the supply of satellite capacity available in the market has increased in recent years, which makes it more difficult for us to sell our services in certain markets and to price our capacity at acceptable levels. Competition may cause downward pressure on prices and further reduce the utilization of our fleet capacity, both of which could have an adverse effect on our financial performance. Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment also competes with fiber optic cable and other terrestrial delivery systems, which may have a cost advantage, particularly in point-to-point applications where such delivery systems have been installed.
Our owned and leased satellites in orbit are subject to significant operational and environmental risks that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
Satellites are subject to significant operational risks while in orbit. These risks include malfunctions, commonly referred to as anomalies, which have occurred in our satellites and the satellites of other operators as a result of various factors, such as satellite design and manufacturing defects, problems with the power systems or control systems of the satellites and general failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh environment of space.
Although we work closely with the satellite manufacturers to determine and eliminate the cause of anomalies in new satellites and provide for redundancies of many critical components in the satellites, we may experience anomalies in the future, whether of the types described above or arising from the failure of other systems or components.
Any single anomaly or series of anomalies could materially and adversely affect our operations and revenues and our relationship with current customers, as well as our ability to attract new customers. In particular, future anomalies may result in the loss of individual transponders on a satellite, a group of transponders on that satellite or the entire satellite, depending on the nature of the anomaly. Anomalies may also reduce the expected useful life of a satellite, thereby reducing the revenue that could be generated by that satellite, or create additional expenses due to the need to provide replacement or back-up satellites or satellite capacity.
Meteoroid events pose a potential threat to all in-orbit satellites. The probability that meteoroids will damage those satellites increases significantly when the Earth passes through the particulate stream left behind by comets. Occasionally, increased solar activity also poses a potential threat to all in-orbit satellites.
Some decommissioned spacecraft are in uncontrolled orbits, which pass through the geostationary belt at various points and present hazards to operational spacecraft, including our satellites. We may be required to perform maneuvers to avoid collisions and these maneuvers may prove unsuccessful or could reduce the useful life of the satellite through the expenditure of fuel to perform these maneuvers. The loss, damage or destruction of any of our
satellites as a result of an electrostatic storm, collision with space debris, malfunction or other event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our satellites have minimum design lives ranging from 12 to 15 years, but could fail or suffer reduced capacity before then.
Generally, the minimum design life of each of our satellites ranges from 12 to 15 years. We can provide no assurance, however, as to the actual operational lives of our satellites, which may be shorter than their design lives. Our ability to earn revenue depends on the continued operation of our satellites, each of which has a limited useful life. A number of factors affect the useful lives of the satellites, including, among other things, the quality of their design and construction, the durability of their component parts, the ability to continue to maintain proper orbit and control over the satellite’s functions, the efficiency of the launch vehicle used, and the remaining on-board fuel following orbit insertion.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may relocate another satellite and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost satellite, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such a relocation would require FCC approval and, among other things, a showing to the FCC that the replacement satellite would not cause additional interference compared to the failed or lost satellite. We cannot be certain that we could obtain such FCC approval. In addition, we cannot guarantee that another satellite will be available for use as a replacement for a failed or lost satellite, or that such relocation can be accomplished without a substantial utilization of fuel. Any such utilization of fuel would reduce the operational life of the replacement satellite.
Our satellites under construction are subject to risks related to construction and launch that could limit our ability to utilize these satellites.
Satellite construction and launch are subject to significant risks, including delays, launch failure and incorrect orbital placement. Certain launch vehicles that may be used by us have either unproven track records or have experienced launch failures in the past. The risks of launch delay and failure are usually greater when the launch vehicle does not have a track record of previous successful flights. Launch failures result in significant delays in the deployment of satellites because of the need both to construct replacement satellites, which can take more than three years, and to obtain other launch opportunities. Construction and launch delays could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues. Historically, we have not carried launch insurance on our satellites; if a launch failure were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to fund future satellite procurement and launch opportunities. In addition, the occurrence of launch failures, whether on our satellites or those of others may significantly reduce the availability of launch insurance on our satellites or make launch insurance premiums uneconomical.
Our business is subject to risks of adverse government regulation.
Our business is subject to varying degrees of regulation in the U.S. by the FCC, and other entities, and in foreign countries by similar entities and internationally by the ITU. These regulations are subject to the political process and have changeddo change from time to time. Moreover, a substantial number of foreign countries in which we have, or may in the future make, an investment, regulate, in varying degrees, the ownership of satellites and the distribution and ownership of programming services and foreign investment in telecommunications companies. Violations of laws or regulations may result in various sanctions including fines, loss of authorizations and the denial of applications for new authorizations or for the renewal of existing authorizations. Further material changes in law and regulatory requirements must be anticipated, and there can be no assurance that our business and the business of our affiliates will not be adversely affected by future legislation, new regulation or deregulation.
Our business depends on regulatory authorizations issued by the FCC licensesand state and foreign regulators, that can expire, or be revoked or modified, and applications for FCC licenses and other authorizations that may not be granted.
Generally all satellite, earth stations and other licenses granted by the FCC and most other countries are subject to expiration unless renewed by the regulatory agency. Our licenses are currently set to expire at various times. In addition, we occasionally receive special temporary authorizations that are granted for limited periods of time (e.g., 180 days or less) and subject to possible renewal. Generally, our licenses and special temporary authorizations have been renewed on a routine basis, but there can be no assurance that this will continue. There can be no assurance that the FCC or other regulators will continue granting applications for new earth stations or for the renewal of existing ones. If the FCC or other regulators were to cancel, revoke, suspend, or fail to renew any of our licenses or authorizations, or fail to grant our applications for FCC or other licenses, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, loss of a frequency authorization would reduce the amount of spectrum available to us, potentially reducing the amount of services we provide to our customers. The significance of such a loss of
authorizations would vary based upon, among other things, the orbital location, the frequency band and the availability of a replacement spectrum. In addition, Congress and political bodies in other countries often considersconsider legislation that could affect us and enactsenact legislation that does affect us, and FCC proceedings to implement the Communications Act, as well as other regulatory proceedings in foreign countries, and enforce itsthe enforcement of their regulations areis ongoing. We cannot predict the outcomes of these legislative or regulatory proceedings or their effect on our business.
In addition, third parties have or may oppose some of our license applications and pending and future requests for extensions, modifications, waivers and approvals of our licenses. Even if we have fully complied with all of the required reporting, filing and other requirements in connection with our authorizations, it is possible a regulator could decline to grant certain of our applications or requests for authority, or could revoke, terminate, condition or decline to modify, extend or renew certain of our authorizations or licenses.
Our ability to sell our digital set-top boxes to certain operators depends on our ability to obtain licenses to use of certain satellites is often dependentthe conditional access systems utilized by these operators.
Our commercial success in selling our digital set-top boxes to cable television and other operators depends significantly on satellite coordination agreements, which may be difficultour ability to obtain.
Satellite transmissions andobtain licenses to use the use of frequencies often are dependent on coordination with other satelliteconditional access systems operateddeployed by U.S. or foreign satellitethese operators and it can be difficult to determinein our digital set-top boxes. In many cases, the outcome of these coordination agreements with these other entities. The impact of a coordination agreement may result in the loss ofintellectual property rights to these conditional access systems are owned by the use of certain frequencies or access to certain markets. The significance of such a loss would vary and it can therefore be difficult to determine which portion of our revenuesset-top box manufacturer that currently provides the system operator with its set-top boxes. We cannot assure you that we will be impacted.
Furthermore the satellite coordination process is conducted under the guidance of the ITU radio regulations and the national regulations of the satellites involved in the coordination process. These rules and regulations could be amended and could therefore materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our dependence on outside contractors could result in delays related to the design, manufacture and launch of our new satellites, which could in turn adversely affect our operating results.
There are a limited number of manufacturers that are able to design and build satellites according to the technical specifications and standards of quality we require, including Astrium Satellites, Boeing Satellite Systems, Lockheed Martin, SS/L and Thales Alenia Space. There are also a limited number of launch service providers able to launch such satellites, including International Launch Services, Arianespace, United Launch Alliance and Sea Launch Company. The loss of any of our manufacturers or launch service providers could increase the cost and result in the delay of the design, construction or launch of our satellites. Even if alternate suppliers for such services are available, we may have difficulty identifying them in a timely manner or we may incur significant additional expense in changing suppliers, and this could result in difficulties or delays in the design, construction or launch of our satellites. Any delays in the design, construction or launch of our satellites could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.obtain required
We generally do not have commercial insurance coverage on the satellites we use and could face significant impairment charges if one of our uninsured satellites fails.
Historically, we have not carried launch or in-orbit insurance on the satellites we use. We generally do not carry in-orbit insurance on any of our satellites, other than SPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVI and EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, and often do not use commercial insurance to mitigate the potential financial impact of launch or in-orbit failures because we believe that the cost of insurance premiums is uneconomical relative to the risk of such failures. If one or more of our in-orbit uninsured satellites fail, we could be required to record significant impairment charges.
The enterprise network communications industry is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against other terrestrial and satellite-based network providers in our enterprise groups.
We operate in a highly competitive enterprise network communications industry in the sale and lease of our products and services. This industry is characterized by competitive pressures to provide enhanced functionality for the same or lower price with each new generation of technology. As the prices of our products decrease, we will need to sell more products and/or reduce the per-unit costs to improve or maintain our results of operations. We face competition from providers of terrestrial-based networks, such as fiber, DSL, cable modem service, Multiprotocol Label Switching and Internet protocol-based virtual private networks, which may have advantages over satellite networks for certain customer applications. Terrestrial-based networks are offered by telecommunications carriers and other large companies, many of which have substantially greater financial resources and greater name recognition than us.
The costs of a satellite network may exceed those of a terrestrial-based network, especially in areas that have experienced significant DSL and cable Internet build-out. It may become more difficult for us to compete with terrestrial providers as the number of these areas increases and the cost of their network and hardware services declines. We also compete for enterprise clients with other satellite network providers, satellite providers that are targeting small and medium businesses and smaller independent systems integratorslicenses on procurement projects.
The consumer network communications market is highly competitive. We may be unsuccessful in competing effectively against fiber, DSL, cable service providers and other satellite broadband providers in the consumer market.
We face competition in our consumer group primarily from fiber, DSL and cable Internet service providers. Also, other telecommunications, satellite and wireless broadband companies have launchedcommercially favorable terms, or are planning the launch of consumer satellite Internet access services in competition with ours in North America. Some of these competitors offer consumer services and hardware at lower prices than ours. In addition, terrestrial alternativesall. If we do not require our external dish whichobtain the necessary licenses, we may limit customer acceptance of our products.
Our primary competitor for consumer satellite Internet access services is ViaSat Communications, which is owned by ViaSat. Following the commencement of service on ViaSat-1 by ViaSat Communications and prior to the commencement of service on EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, ViaSat Communications may be in a better position economically to offer faster connection speeds than us, and there can therefore be no assurance that our product offerings will remain competitive with those of ViaSat Communications. As discussed above, there can be no assurance that the expected launch of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter in the summer of 2012 will not be delayed or will not fail.
We are dependent upon third-party providers for components, manufacturing, installation services, and customer support services, and our resultsprevented from pursuing the development of operations may be materially adversely affected if any of these third-party providers failsome potential products with cable or other television operators. Our failure to appropriately deliverobtain a license to use the contracted goods or services.
We are dependent upon third-party services and products provided to us, including the following:
·Components. A limited number of suppliers and in some cases a single supplier manufacture some of the key components required to build our products. These key components may not be continually available andconditional access systems that we may not be ablerequire to forecastdevelop or commercialize our component requirements sufficientlydigital set-top boxes with cable television or other operators, in advance, which may have a detrimental effect on supply. If we are required to change suppliers for any reason, we would experience a delay in manufacturing our products if another supplier is not able to meet our requirements on a timely basis. In addition, if we are unable to obtain the necessary volumes of components on favorable terms or prices on a timely basis, we may be unable to produce our products at competitive prices and we may be unable to satisfy demand from our customers.
·Commodity Price Risk. Many of our products contain components whose base raw materials have undergone dramatic cost fluctuations in the last 24 months. Fluctuations in pricing of raw materials have the ability to affect our product costs. Although we have been successful in offsetting or mitigating our exposure to these fluctuations, such changes could have an adverse impact on our product costs.
·Manufacturing. While we develop and manufacture prototypes for our products, we use contract manufacturers to produce a significant portion of our hardware. If these contract manufacturers fail to provide products that meet our specifications in a timely manner, then our customer relationships may be harmed.
·Installation and customer support services. Each of our North American and international operations utilizes a network of third-party installers to deploy our hardware. In addition, a portion of our customer support and management is provided by offshore call centers. Since we provide customized services for our customers that are essential to their operations, a decline in levels of service or attention to the needs of our customers could adversely affect our reputation, renewal rates and ability to win new business.
We currently have unused satellite capacity in our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected if we are not able to lease more of this capacity to third parties.
While we are currently evaluating various opportunities to make profitable use of our satellite capacity (including, but not limited to, supplying satellite capacity for new international ventures), we do not have firm plans to utilize all of our satellite capacity. In addition, especially in light of the potential continued lack of demand for satellite services as a result of sustained economic weakness, there can be no assurance that we can successfully develop the business opportunities we currently plan to pursue with this capacity. If we are unable to lease our excess satellite capacity to third parties, our margins would be negatively impacted and we may be required to record impairments related to our satellites.
The failure to adequately anticipate the need for transponder capacity or the inability to obtain transponder capacity for our Hughes segment could harm our results of operations.
Our Hughes segment has made substantial contractual commitments for transponder capacity based on our existing customer contracts and backlog, as well as anticipated future business, to the extent our existing broadband customers are not expected to utilize our SPACEWAY 3 satellite. If future demand does not meet our expectations, we will be committed to maintaining excess transponder capacity for which we will have no, or insufficient, revenues to cover our costs, which would have a negative impact on our margins and results of operations. We have transponder capacity commitments, generally for two to five year terms, with third parties to cover different geographical areas or support different applications and features; therefore, we may not be able to quickly or easily adjust our capacity to changes in demand. If we only purchase transponder capacity based on existing contracts and bookings, capacity for certain types of coverage in the future that cannot be readily served by SPACEWAY 3 may be unavailable to us, and we may not be able to satisfy certain needs of our customers, which could result in a loss of possible new business and could negatively impact the margins earned for those services. At present, until the launch and operation of additional satellites, there is limited availability of capacity on the Ku-band frequencies in North America. In addition, the FSS industry has seen consolidation in the past decade, and today, the three main FSS providers in North America and a number of smaller regional providers own and operate the current satellites that are available for our capacity needs. The failure of any of these FSS providers to replace existing satellite assets at the end of their useful lives or a downturn in their industry as a whole could reduce or interrupt the Ku-band capacity available to us. If we are not able to renew our capacity leases at economically viable rates, or if capacity is not available due to any problems of the FSS providers, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected, to the extent SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII/Jupiter are unable to satisfy the associated demand.
If our products contain defects, we could be subject to significant costs to correct such defects and our product and network service contracts could be delayed or cancelled, which could adversely affect our revenues.
The products and the networks we deploy are highly complex, and some may contain defects when first introduced or when new versions or enhancements are released, despite extensive testing and our quality control procedures. In addition, many of our products and network services are designed to interface with our customers’ existing networks, each of which has different specifications and utilizes multiple protocol standards. Our products and services must interoperate with the other products and services within our customers’ networks, as well as with future products and services that might be added to these networks, to meet our customers’ requirements. The occurrence of any defects, errors or failures in our products or network services could result in: (i) additional costs to correct such defects; (ii) cancellation of orders; (iii) a reduction in revenue backlog; (iv) product returns or recalls; (v) diversion of our resources; and (vi) the issuance of credits to customers and other losses to us, our customers or end users. Any of these occurrences could also result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products and services and loss of sales, whichturn, would harm our reputationability to grow our customer base and our business and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.revenue.
We may face difficulties in accurately assessing and collecting contributions towards the Universal Service Fund.
As a provider of telecommunications services in the U.S., we are presently required to contribute a fee, which is based upon a percentage of our revenuesrevenue from telecommunications services, to the Universal Service Fund to support mechanisms that subsidize the provision of services to low-income consumers, high-cost areas, schools, libraries and rural health
care providers. This percentage is set each calendar quarter by the FCC. Current FCC rules permit us to pass this Universal Service Fund contribution onto our customers.
Because our customer contracts often include both telecommunications services, which create such support obligations, and other goods and services, which do not, it can be difficult to determine which portion of our revenuesrevenue forms the basis for this contribution and the amount that we can recover from our customers. If the FCC, which oversees the support mechanisms, or a court or other governmental entity were to determine that we computed our contribution obligation incorrectly or passed the wrong amount onto our customers, we could become subject to additional assessments, liabilities, or other financial penalties. In addition, the FCC is considering substantial changes to its Universal Service Fund contribution and distribution rules. These changes could impact our future contribution obligations and those of third parties that provide communication services to our business. Any such change to the Universal Service Fund contribution rules could adversely affect our costs of providing service to our customers. In addition, changes to the Universal Service Fund distribution rules could intensify the competition we face by offering subsidies to competing firms and/or technologies.
OTHER RISKS
Our foreign operations exposeWe are controlled by one principal stockholder who is our Chairman.
Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, beneficially owns approximately 50.2% of our total equity securities (assuming conversion of only the Class B Common Stock held by Mr. Ergen into Class A Common Stock) and possesses approximately 80.8% of the total voting power. Mr. Ergen's beneficial ownership of us excludes 5,738,471 shares of our Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of our Class B Common Stock currently held by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. These trusts beneficially own approximately 11.8% of our total equity securities (assuming conversion of only the Class B Common Stock held by such trusts into Class A Common Stock) and possess approximately 11.0% of our total voting power. Thus, Mr. Ergen has the ability to elect a majority of our directors and to control all other matters requiring the approval of our stockholders. As a result of Mr. Ergen's voting power, we are a "controlled company" as defined in the Nasdaq listing rules and, therefore, are not subject to Nasdaq requirements that would otherwise require us to regulatory risks and restrictions not present in our domestic operations.
Our operations outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 19.3%, 14.5% and 15.9%have (i) a majority of independent directors; (ii) a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors; (iii) compensation of our revenuesexecutive officers determined by a majority of the independent directors or a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors; and (iv) director nominees selected, or recommended for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We expect our foreign operations to continue to representBoard's selection, either by a significant portionmajority of our business. We have operations in Brazil, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Mexico, the Russian Federation, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and China, among other nations. Over the last 20 years, Hughes Communications has sold products in over 100 countries. Our foreign operations involve varying degreesindependent directors or a nominating committee composed solely of risks and uncertainties inherent in doing business abroad. Such risks include:independent directors.
·Complications in complying with restrictions on foreign ownership and investment and limitations on repatriation. We may not be permitted to own our operations in some countries and may have to enter into partnership or joint venture relationships. Many foreign legal regimes restrict our repatriation of earnings to the U.S. from our subsidiaries and joint venture entities. Applicable law in such foreign countries may also limit our ability to distribute or access our assets in certain circumstances. In such event, we will not have access to the cash flow and assets of our joint ventures.
·Difficulties in following a variety of foreign laws and regulations, such as those relating to data content retention, privacy and employee welfare. Our international operations are subject to the laws of many different jurisdictions that may differ significantly from U.S. law. For example, local political or intellectual property law may hold us responsible for the data that is transmitted over our network by our customers. Also, other nations have more stringent employee welfare laws that guarantee perquisites that we must offer. Compliance with these laws may lead to increased operations costs, loss of business opportunities or violations that result in fines or other penalties.
·Restrictions on space station landing rights/coordination. Satellite market access and landing rights are dependent on the national regulations established by foreign governments, including, but not limited to: (a) national coordination requirements and registration requirements for satellites; and (b) reporting requirements of national telecommunications regulators with respect to service provision and satellite performance.
·Financial and legal constraints and obligations. Operating pursuant to foreign licenses subjects us to certain financial constraints and obligations, including, but not limited to: (a) tax liabilities that may or may not be dependent on revenues; (b) the burden of creating and maintaining additional facilities and staffing in foreign jurisdictions; and (c) legal regulations requiring that we make available “free” satellite capacity for national social programming, which may impact our revenue.
·Significant competition in our international markets. Outside North America, we have traditionally competed for hardware and services sales primarily in Europe, Brazil and India and focused only on hardware revenues in other regions. In Europe, we face intense competition which is not expected to abate in the near future.
·Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. We conduct our business and incur cost in the local currency of a number of the countries in which we operate. Accordingly, our results of operations are reported in the relevant local currency and then translated to U.S. dollars at the applicable currency exchange rate for inclusion in our financial statements. These fluctuations in currency exchange rates have affected, and may in the future affect, revenue, profits and cash earned on international sales. In addition, we sell our products and services and acquire supplies and components from countries that historically have been, and may continue to be, susceptible to recessions or currency devaluation.
·Greater exposure to the possibility of economic instability, the disruption of operations from labor and political disturbances, expropriation or war. As we conduct operations throughout the world, we could be subject to regional or national economic downturns or instability, labor or political disturbances or conflicts of various sizes. Any of these disruptions could detrimentally affect our sales in the affected region or country or lead to damage to, or expropriation of, our property or danger to our personnel.
·Competition with large or state-owned enterprises and/or regulations that effectively limit our operations and favor local competitors. Many of the countries in which we conduct business have traditionally had state owned or state granted monopolies on telecommunications services that favor an incumbent service provider. We face competition from these favored and entrenched companies in countries that have not deregulated. The slower pace of deregulation in these countries, particularly in Asia and Latin America, has adversely affected the growth of our business in these regions.
·Customer credit risks. Customer credit risks are exacerbated in foreign operations because there is often little information available about the credit histories of customers in the foreign countries in which we operate.
Although we expect that the Hughes Acquisition will benefit us, those expected benefits may not occur because of the complexity of integration and other challenges.
We acquired Hughes Communications on June 8, 2011. Achieving the expected benefits of the Hughes Acquisition will depend in part on our ability to integrate Hughes Communications’ operations, technology and personnel in a timely and efficient manner. We have incurred substantial direct transaction costs associated with the Hughes Acquisition, and will incur additional costs associated with consolidation and integration of operations. The integration of Hughes Communications is complex, time-consuming, and expensive, and may disrupt our business or result in the loss of our or Hughes Communications’ customers or key employees or the diversion of our management’s attention. In addition, the integration process may strain our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures. This may result in the diversion of management and financial resources from our principal core business objectives. There can be no assurance that the integration will be completed as quickly as we expect or that the Hughes Acquisition will achieve its expected benefits. Moreover, issues arising from the integration of EchoStar and Hughes Communications, including, among others, differences in corporate culture, may affect our ability to retain technically skilled employees of either company. If we are unable to attract and retain technically skilled employees, we may not be able to respond to changes in technologies and, as a result, our competitive position could be materially and adversely affected.
If the total costs of the Hughes Acquisition exceed estimates or if the expected benefits of the Hughes Acquisition do not exceed the total costs of the Hughes Acquisition, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Other Risks
We have potential conflicts of interest with DISH Network due to our common ownership and managementmanagement..
Questions relating to conflicts of interest may arise between DISH Network and us in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships. Areas in which conflicts of interest between DISH Network and us could arise include, but are not limited to, the following:
·
·
·Competition for business opportunitiesopportunities.. DISH Network retains its interests in various companies that have subsidiaries or controlled affiliates that own or operate domestic or foreign services that may compete with services offered by our businesses. In addition, pursuant to a distribution agreement, DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute our Hughes segment's broadband internet service under the dishNET brand which could
compete with sales by our Hughes segment. DISH Network also has a distribution agreement with ViaSat, a competitor of our Hughes segment, to sell services similar to those offered by our Hughes segment. We may also compete with DISH Network when we participate in auctions for spectrum or orbital slots for our satellites.
We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts of interest with DISH Network and, even if we do so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party.
WeExcept for the DISH Digital joint venture agreements that we entered into with DISH Network in 2012, which, subject to certain exceptions, limits DISH Network's and our ability to operate an IPTV service other than that operated by DISH Digital, we do not have any agreements with DISH Network that would prevent us from competing with each other.
We cannot assure you However, many of our potential customers have historically perceived us as a competitor due to our affiliation with DISH Network. There can be no assurance that therewe will not be deficiencies leading to material weaknessessuccessful in our internal control over financial reporting.
We periodically evaluate and test our internal control over financial reporting to satisfy the requirementsentering into any commercial relationships with potential customers who are competitors of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. On June 8, 2011,DISH Network (particularly if we completed the Hughes Acquisition. We are currently integrating policies, processes, people, technology and operations for the combined company. Management will continue to evaluate our internal control over financial reportingbe perceived as we execute integration activities. Exceptaffiliated with DISH Network as discussed above, oura result of common ownership and certain shared management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011. If in the future we are unable to report that our internal control over financial reporting is effective (or if our auditors do not agree with our assessment of the effectiveness of, or are unable to express an opinion on, our internal control over financial reporting), investors, customers and business partners could lose confidence in the accuracy of our financial reports, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, investor confidence in our financial results may weaken, and our stock price may suffer.services).
It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so may be beneficial to our shareholders, because of our capital structure.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company that a shareholder may consider favorable. These provisions include the following:
·
·
·
·
In addition, pursuant to our certificate of incorporation we have a significant amount of authorized and unissued stock that would allow our Board of Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management, thereby protecting the continuity of management, or which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of persons seeking to obtain control of us.
We are controlled by one principal stockholder who is our Chairman.
Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, beneficially owns approximately 50.7% of our total equity securities (assuming conversion of only the Class B Common Stock held by Mr. Ergen into Class A Common Stock) and possesses approximately 75.6% of the total voting power. Mr. Ergen’s beneficial ownership of us excludes 8,734,250 shares of our Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of shares of our Class B Common Stock currently held by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. These trusts beneficially own approximately 18.3% of our total equity securities (assuming conversion of only the Class B Common Stock held by such trusts
into Class A Common Stock) and possess approximately 16.9% of our total voting power. Thus, Mr. Ergen has the ability to elect a majority of our directors and to control all other matters requiring the approval of our stockholders. As a result of Mr. Ergen’s voting power, we are a “controlled company” as defined in the Nasdaq listing rules and, therefore, are not subject to Nasdaq requirements that would otherwise require us to have (i) a majority of independent directors; (ii) a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors; (iii) compensation of our executive officers determined by a majority of the independent directors or a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors; and (iv) director nominees selected, or recommended for the Board’s selection, either by a majority of the independent directors or a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors.
We may face other risks described from time to time in periodic and current reports we file with the SEC.
Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
None
Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Inverness Terrace East, Englewood, Colorado 80112-5308 and our telephone number is (303) 706-4000. The following table sets forth certain information concerning our principal properties related to our EchoStar Technologies segment (“ETS”("ET"), Hughes segment ("Hughes"), EchoStar Satellite Services segment (“ESS”("ESS") and Hughes segment (“Hughes”to our other operations and administrative functions ("Other"). We operate various facilities in the U.S. and abroad. We believe that our facilities are well maintained and are sufficient to meet our current and projected needs. We own or lease capacity on 11 satellites which are used in our EchoStar Satellite Services and Hughes segments.
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Location(3)(4) | Segment(s) | Leased/ Owned | Function | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Engineering and data center |
|
| ||||||||||||
Superior, Colorado | ET | Leased | Engineering offices | |||||||||||
| Atlanta, Georgia | ET | Leased | Engineering offices | |||||||||||
| Atlanta, Georgia(1) | ET | Leased | Micro digital broadcast operations center | |||||||||||
| Jackson, Mississippi(1) | ET | Leased | Micro digital broadcast operations center | |||||||||||
| St. Louis, Missouri(1) | ET | Leased | Micro digital broadcast operations center | |||||||||||
| Bangalore, India | ET | Leased | Engineering office | |||||||||||
| Kharkov, Ukraine | ET | Leased | Engineering office | |||||||||||
| Steeton, England | ET | Owned | Engineering office | |||||||||||
| San Diego, California | Hughes | Leased | Engineering and sales |
|
| offices | ||||||||
|
| Leased |
| |||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Southfield, Michigan(1) | Hughes | Leased | Shared hub | |||||||||||
| Las Vegas, Nevada(1) | Hughes | Leased | Shared hub, antennae yards, gateway, backup network operation and control center for Hughes | |||||||||||
| Barueri, Brazil(1) | Hughes | Leased | Shared hub | |||||||||||
| Sao Paulo, Brazil | Hughes | Leased | Hughes Brazil corporate headquarters, sales offices, and warehouse | |||||||||||
| Griesheim, Germany(1) | Hughes | Leased | Shared hub, operations, administrative offices and warehouse | |||||||||||
| Gurgaon, India(1)(2) | Hughes | Leased | Administrative offices, shared hub, operations, warehouse, and |
|
| development center | ||||||||
New Delhi, India | Hughes | Leased | Hughes | |||||||||||
| Milton Keynes, United Kingdom | Hughes | Leased | Hughes Europe corporate headquarters and operations |
|
| |||||||||
| Hughes | Owned | Hughes corporate headquarters, |
|
| engineering offices, network operations and shared hubs | ||||||||
|
| Owned |
| |||||||||||
Digital broadcast operations center |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| ||||||||||||
Monee, Illinois(1) | ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
Orange, New Jersey(1) | ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
New Braunfels, Texas(1) | ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
|
| Owned |
| |||||||||||
Micro digital broadcast operations center |
|
| ||||||||||||
| ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
| ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
| ET/ESS | Owned | Regional digital broadcast operations center |
|
| |||||||||
| ET/ESS | Owned | Digital broadcast operations |
|
| center | ||||||||
|
| Leased |
| |||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||
Spacecraft autotrack operations center |
|
| ||||||||||||
Black Hawk, South Dakota(1) | ESS | Owned | Spacecraft autotrack operations center | |||||||||||
| Englewood, Colorado |
|
| Corporate headquarters, engineering offices |
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with DISH Network that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the termsWestern part of the separation agreement, we have assumed certain liabilitiesU.S. that relate to our business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred priorsupport the SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII satellites.
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities. Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these casesproceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages. We
regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate. If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.
We record an accrual for litigation and other loss contingencies when we determine that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal fees and other costs of defending litigation are charged to expense as incurred.
For certain cases described below, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties (as with many patent-related cases). For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
California Institute of Technology
Broadcast Innovation,On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology ("Caltech") filed suit against two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, as well as against DISH Network, DISH Network L.L.C., and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,116,710, 7,421,032, 7,916,781, and 8,284,833, each of which is entitled "Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes." Caltech appears to assert that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes, each of the asserted patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to our consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C. (“Broadcast Innovation”CRFD Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of Marathon Patent Group, Inc.)
On January 17, 2014, CRFD Research, Inc. ("CRFD") filed a lawsuitcomplaint against EchoStar Corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as against DISH Network, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer ElectronicsDISH DBS and othersDISH Network L.L.C., in U.S.United States District Court in Denver, Colorado. Broadcast Innovationfor the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,191,233 (the "233 patent"). The 233 patent is entitled "System for Automated, Mid-Session, User-Directed, Device-to-Device Session Transfer System," and relates to transferring an ongoing software session from one device to another. CRFD alleges that certain of our set-top boxes infringe the 233 patent. On the same day, CRFD filed patent infringement complaints against AT&T Inc., Comcast Corp., DirecTV, Time Warner Cable Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Level 3 Communications, Inc., Akamai Technologies, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corp. and Limelight Networks, Inc. CRFD is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the “‘094 patent”) and 4,992,066 (the “‘066 patent”). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving DISH Network as the only defendant.
During 2004, the District Court issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the District Court found the ‘094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned that finding of invalidity with respect to the ‘094 patent and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a request for reexamination of the ‘094 patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and on December 13, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate cancelling all claims of the ‘094 patent. On February 2, 2012, Broadcast Innovation dismissed the case against DISH Network with prejudice.
Cyberfone Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, LLC)
On September 15, 2011, LVL Patent Group, LLC filed a complaint against us and our wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, and DirecTV, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,044,382, which is entitled “Data Transaction Assembly Server.” On November 18, 2011, Cyberfone Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, LLC) filed an amended complaint making the same claim. DirecTV was dismissed from the case on January 4, 2012.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we
currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
InterADE-Contact Technologies, LLC
On February 22, 2012, E-Contact Technologies, LLC ("E-Contact") filed suit against two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,347,579, which is entitled "Personal Computer Diary." E-Contact appeared to assert that some portion of HughesNet email services infringed that patent. On April 17, 2013, the Court ordered E-Contact to show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed in light of a number of E-Contact's patent claims being invalidated in an associated case,E-Contact Technologies, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al., 1:11-cv-432 (E.D. Tex.). On April 22, 2013, the Court granted a stipulated motion that dismissed with prejudice E-Contact's claims against us, and the matter is now concluded.
The Hopper Litigation
On May 24, 2012, DISH Network L.L.C., filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. ("ABC"), CBS Corporation ("CBS"), Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Television Holdings, Inc., Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. (collectively, "Fox") and NBCUniversal Media, LLC ("NBC"). The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that DISH Network L.L.C is not infringing any defendant's copyright, or breaching any defendant's retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop™ features in the Hopper™ set-top boxes we design and sell to DISH Network. A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days. A consumer can use the AutoHop feature at his or her option, to watch certain recordings the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back the next day after the show's original airing.
Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against DISH Network and DISH Network L.L.C. (collectively, "DISH") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as DISH's use of Sling placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC, Universal Network Television, LLC, Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal Media, LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.
As a result of certain parties' competing counterclaims and venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks filing various amended complaints, the claims are presently pending in the following venues: (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC parties are pending in New York; (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the CBS parties are pending in New York; (3) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox parties are pending in California; and (4) the copyright and contract claims regarding the NBC parties are pending in California.
On September 16, 2011, InterAD Technologies, LLC (“InterAD”)21, 2012, the United States District Court for the Central District of California heard the Fox plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box's PrimeTime
Anytime and AutoHop features and, on November 7, 2012, entered an order denying the motion. The Fox plaintiffs appealed and on July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, which was denied on January 24, 2014. On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs.
On August 17, 2012, the NBC plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint againstin their California action adding us and our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. to the NBC litigation, alleging various claims of copyright infringement. We and our subsidiary answered on September 18, 2012. On October 9, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C., as well aswith the CBS plaintiffs filing similar copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. on October 12, 2012. Additionally, the CBS plaintiffs have filed a counterclaim alleging that DISH fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating renewal of its CBS retransmission consent agreement. On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box's PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion. The ABC plaintiffs appealed, and oral argument on the appeal began on February 20, 2014 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against: (i) DISH, seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers™ feature in the second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of a retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH, seeking to enjoin the Sling placeshifting functionality in the second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement by both defendants, and breach of the earlier-mentioned retransmission consent agreement by DISH. A hearing on that motion was held on April 19, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs' motion was denied on September 23, 2013, and the Fox plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on October 22, 2013. The Fox claims are set for trial on January 13, 2015, and the ABC and CBS claims are set to be trial-ready on April 17, 2015.
We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to DISH Network. An adverse decision against DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned subsidiarycould decrease the number of Sling enabled set-top boxes we sell to DISH Network, Atlantic Broadband Finance,which could have an adverse impact on the business operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment. In addition, to the extent that DISH Network experiences fewer gross new subscriber additions, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Lightsquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC AT&T,(LightSquared Bankruptcy)
On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, "Harbinger"), a shareholder of LightSquared Inc., Bright House Networks,filed an adversary proceeding against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation, L-Band Acquisition, LLC Cable One, Inc.("LBAC"), Cequel Communications,Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman), SP Special Opportunities, LLC Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., CSC Holdings, LLC, DirecTV, Inc., Insight Communications Company, Inc., Knology, Inc., Mediacom Broadband, LLC, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc.("SPSO") (an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen), and Verizon, Inc.certain other parties, in the U.S. DistrictLightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Delaware alleging infringementNew York (the "Bankruptcy Court"), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC). Harbinger alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with
prospective economic advantage related to Television Programming.” certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SPSO. Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation and LBAC.
On January 5, 2012, InterAD voluntarilyOctober 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the caseclaims against us without prejudice.in Harbinger's complaint in their entirety, but granted leave for LightSquared to file its own complaint in intervention. On November 15, 2013, LightSquared filed its complaint, which included various claims against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation, Mr. Ergen and SPSO. On December 2, 2013, Harbinger filed an amended complaint, asserting various claims against SPSO. On December 12, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed several of the claims asserted by LightSquared and Harbinger. The surviving claims include, among others, LightSquared's claims against SPSO for declaratory relief, breach of contract and statutory disallowance; LightSquared's tortious interference claim against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation and Mr. Ergen; and Harbinger's claim against SPSO for equitable disallowance. These claims proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 9, 2014, which concluded on January 17, 2014. The parties are in the process of post-trial briefing and a hearing for closing arguments has been set for March 12, 2014.
We intend to vigorously defend this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Joao Control & Monitoring SystemsNazomi Communications, Inc.
During DecemberOn February 10, 2010, Joao Control & Monitoring Systems (“Joao”Nazomi Communications, Inc. ("Nazomi") filed suit against Sling Media, Inc. ("Sling"), our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, ACTI Corporation, ADT Security, Alarmclub.Com, American Honda Motor Company, BMW, Byremote, Drivecam, Honeywell, Iveda Corporation, Magtec Products, Mercedes-Benz, On-Net Surveillance, OnStar, SafeFreight Technology, Skyway Security, SmartVue Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, Tyco, UTC Fireas well as Nokia Corp, Nokia Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Western Digital Corp., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Garmin Corp., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Vizio Inc. and XanbooiOmega Corp in the U.S.United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent Nos. 6,549,130No. 7,080,362 (the "362 patent") and 6,587,046.United States Patent No. 7,225,436 (the "436 patent"). The abstracts of362 patent and the patents state that436 patent relate to Java hardware acceleration. On August 14, 2012, the claims are directed to the remote control of devices and appliances. Joao is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. During 2011, the case was transferred toUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California.
California, to which the case had earlier been transferred, granted Sling's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. On January 10, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's grant of summary judgment.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Nazomi Communications, Inc.Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC
On February 10, 2010, Nazomi Communications, Inc. (“Nazomi”November 30, 2012, Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC ("NAT") filed suit against Sling Media, Inc.,Hughes Network Systems, LLC, our indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, Nokia Corp, Nokia Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Western Digital Corp., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Garmin Corp., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Vizio Inc. and iOmega Corp in the U.S.United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaDelaware alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. 7,080,3626,091,710 (the “‘362 patent”"710 patent"), which is entitled "System and Method for Preventing Data Slow Down Over Asymmetric Data Transmission Links." NAT re-filed its case on July 19, 2013. NAT is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, as well as an ongoing royalty obligation. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Personalized Media Communications, Inc.
During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. ("PMC") filed suit against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network and Motorola Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing. PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving DISH Network and us as defendants. On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and U.S. Patent No. 7,225,436 (the “‘436 patent”TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, "Gemstar"). The ‘362 patent as a party, and the ‘436 patent relate to Java hardware acceleration. The suit alleges that the Slingbox-Pro-HD product infringes the ‘362 patent and the ‘436 patent because the Slingbox-PRO HD allegedly incorporates an ARM926EJ-S processor core capable of Java hardware acceleration. During 2010, the case was transferredadded a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the Northern Districtscope of California.
Gemstar's license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and we are sub licensees. A new trial date has not yet been set.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
NorthPoint Technology, Ltd.
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd. (“NorthPoint”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, and DirecTV in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,208,636 (the “‘636 patent”). The ‘636 patent relates to the use of multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite reception. On April 21, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued an order granting reexamination of the ‘636 patent. On June 21, 2011, the District Court entered summary judgment in our favor, finding that all asserted claims of the ‘636 patent are invalid. NorthPoint has appealed.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could requirecause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Premier International Associates, LLC
Personalized Media Communications, Inc.
During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”On August 3, 2012, Premier International Associates, LLC ("Premier International Associates") filed suit against us,EchoStar Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH Network and Motorola Inc.its indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, DISH DBS and DISH Network L.L.C., in the U.S.United States District Court for the EasternNorthern District of TexasIllinois alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243,No. 6,243,725 (the "725 patent"), which relateis entitled "List Building System." The 725 patent relates to satellite signal processing. PMCa system for building an inventory of audio/visual works. Premier International Associates is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC leavingOn March 27, 2013, Premier International Associates dismissed the action against us and the DISH Network defendants with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement under which we and us as defendants. Trialthe DISH Network defendants made an immaterial payment in exchange for a license to certain patents and patent applications.
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
On December 5, 2012, Greg Jacobi, derivatively on behalf of EchoStar Corporation, filed suit (the "Jacobi Litigation") against Charles W. Ergen, Michael T. Dugan, R. Stanton Dodge, Tom A. Ortolf, C. Michael Schroeder, Joseph P. Clayton, David K. Moskowitz, and EchoStar Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The complaint alleges that a March 2011 attempted grant of 1.5 million stock options to Charles Ergen breached defendants' fiduciary duties, resulted in unjust enrichment, and constituted a waste of corporate assets.
On December 18, 2012, Chester County Employees' Retirement Fund, derivatively on behalf of EchoStar Corporation, filed a suit (the "Chester County Litigation") against Charles W. Ergen, Michael T. Dugan, R. Stanton Dodge, Tom A. Ortolf, C. Michael Schroeder, Anthony M. Federico, Pradman P. Kaul, Joseph P. Clayton, and EchoStar Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The complaint similarly alleges that the March 2011 attempted grant of 1.5 million stock options to Charles Ergen breached defendants' fiduciary duties, resulted in unjust enrichment, and constituted a waste of corporate assets.
On February 22, 2013, the Chester County Litigation was transferred to the District of Nevada, and on April 3, 2013, the Chester County Litigation was consolidated into the Jacobi Litigation.
Of the attempted grant of 1.5 million options to Mr. Ergen in 2011, only 800,000 were validly granted and remain outstanding. We intend to vigorously defend these cases. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability.
Technology Development and Licensing, LLC
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing, LLC ("TDL") filed suit against EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. TDL is currently set for August 2012.
an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two reexamination petitions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents,patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could requirecause us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
TQP Development, LLC
Suomen Colorize Oy
DuringOn October 2010, Suomen Colorize Oy (“Suomen”11, 2012, TQP Development, LLC ("TQP") filed suit against us and DISH Network L.L.C., an indirect wholly ownedour indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, of DISH Network,Sling Media, Inc. in the U.S.United States District Court for the MiddleEastern District of FloridaTexas, alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. 7,277,398. The abstract5,412,730, which is entitled "Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys." On November 14, 2012, TQP filed suit in the same venue against Hughes Network Systems, LLC, our indirectly wholly owned subsidiary, alleging infringement of the patent states that the claims are directed to a method and terminal for providing services in a telecommunications network. Suomensame patent. TQP is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, and on January 10, 2012, Suomen voluntarily dismissed the case against us without prejudice.
Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C.
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”) filed suit against us and DISH Network in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. In July 2009,8, 2013, the Court granted oura joint motion to staydismiss the case pending two reexamination petitions before the Patent and Trademark Office.
claims against Sling without prejudice.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off.damages. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
TiVo Inc.
In connection with our litigation with TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”), which is described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3. Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.,” on April 20, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the District Court’s contempt ruling on infringement, articulated a new standard for determining “colorable difference” and remanded that issue back to the District Court for determination. The Federal Circuit also vacated the District Court’s amended injunction requiring that we inform the court of any further attempts to design around TiVo’s U.S. Patent No. 6,233,389 (the “‘389 patent”) and seek approval from the court before any such design-around is implemented. The Federal Circuit also vacated the infringement damages for the period after we deployed our original alternative technology (although it did not foreclose that damages may be reinstated if upon remand a new court or jury decision found that the original alternative technology infringed TiVo’s ‘389 patent). The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s contempt ruling on disablement, holding that the original 2006 injunction required that we disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes deployed with customers (the “Disablement Provision”) and affirmed the $90 million in contempt sanctions awarded against us for violating the Disablement Provision.
On April 29, 2011, we and DISH Network entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo. The settlement resolves all pending litigation between us and DISH Network, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH Network digital video recorders, or DVRs, which litigation is described in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3. Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.”
Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation has been dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by us and DISH Network have been dissolved. We and DISH Network are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with our Spin-off from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for a contribution from us totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to our sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer. Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and us based on historical sales of certain licensed products with our being responsible for 5% of each annual payment, or approximately $10 million in total. Of our initial payment of $10 million, approximately $8 million relates to prior periods and the remaining $2 million represents a prepayment. The prepayment of $2 million is being expensed ratably from April 1, 2011 through July 31, 2018, the expiration date of the ‘389 patent.
In addition, under the settlement agreement, TiVo granted us a license under its ‘389 patent and certain related patents, for the remaining life of those patents, solely to design and make certain DVR-enabled products for DISH Network and two international customers. We granted TiVo a license under certain DVR-related patents held by us for TiVo-branded, co-branded and ingredient branded products.
We and DISH Network, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, have also agreed on mutual releases of certain related claims and agreed not to challenge each other’s DVR technology-related patents that are licensed under the settlement agreement.
Because both we and DISH Network were defendants in the TiVo lawsuit, we and DISH Network were jointly and severally liable to TiVo for any final damages and sanctions that could have been awarded by the District Court. As previously disclosed, DISH Network agreed that it was obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We contributed an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the receiver agreement, and during 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for this amount to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the receiver agreement. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to
joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology. Any amounts that we are responsible for under the settlement agreement with TiVo are in addition to the $5 million contribution previously made by us.
Vigilos, LLC
On February 23, 2011, Vigilos, LLC filed suit against us, two of our subsidiaries, Sling Media, Inc. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and Monsoon Multimedia, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,839,731, which is entitled “System and Method for Providing Data Communication in a Device Network.” Subsequently in 2011, Vigilos added DISH Network L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of DISH Network, as a defendant in its First Amended Complaint and the case was transferred to the Northern District of California. Later in 2011, Vigilos filed a Second Amended Complaint that added claims for infringement of a second patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,370,074, which is entitled “System and Method for Implementing Open-Protocol Remote Device Control.”
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’SREGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’sRegistrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information. Our Class A common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market ("Nasdaq") under the symbol “SATS.”"SATS." The high and low closing sale prices of our Class A common stock during 20112013 and 20102012 on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (as reported by Nasdaq) are set forth below.
2013 | High | Low | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Quarter | $ | 39.99 | $ | 32.55 | |||
Second Quarter | $ | 40.98 | $ | 36.92 | |||
Third Quarter | $ | 45.50 | $ | 37.22 | |||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 51.60 | $ | 44.17 | |||
2011 |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
First Quarter |
| $ | 37.85 |
| $ | 25.47 |
|
Second Quarter |
| 37.62 |
| 32.00 |
| ||
Third Quarter |
| 38.36 |
| 21.36 |
| ||
Fourth Quarter |
| 26.80 |
| 20.35 |
| ||
2010 |
| High |
| Low |
| ||
First Quarter |
| $ | 20.71 |
| $ | 18.68 |
|
Second Quarter |
| 21.53 |
| 18.05 |
| ||
Third Quarter |
| 20.33 |
| 18.44 |
| ||
Fourth Quarter |
| 24.97 |
| 18.77 |
| ||
2012 | High | Low | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Quarter | $ | 32.18 | $ | 20.94 | |||
Second Quarter | $ | 29.52 | $ | 25.30 | |||
Third Quarter | $ | 30.35 | $ | 25.65 | |||
Fourth Quarter | $ | 34.86 | $ | 28.40 | |||
As of February 14, 2012,13, 2014, there were approximately 10,82210,311 holders of record of our Class A common stock, not including stockholders who beneficially own Class A common stock held in nominee or street name. As of February 14, 2012, 38,952,78913, 2014, 41,948,568 of the 47,687,039 outstanding shares of our Class B common stock were held by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and the remaining 8,734,2505,738,471 were held in a trust for members of Mr. Ergen’sErgen's family. There is currently no established trading market for our Class B common stock.
Dividends. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock in the past two years. We currently do not intend to declare dividends on our common stock. Payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors the Board of Directors considers appropriate. We currently intend to retain our earnings, if any, to support future growth and expansion although we expect to repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time. See further discussion under “ItemItem 7. Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”Resources in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. See “ItemItem 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters”Matters in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table provides information regarding repurchases ofPursuant to a stock repurchase plan approved by our Class A common stock from October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.
Period |
| Total |
| Average |
| Total Number of |
| Maximum Approximate |
| ||
|
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
| ||||||||
October 1 - October 31, 2011 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | 500,000 |
|
November 1 - November 30, 2011 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | 500,000 |
|
December 1 - December 31, 2011 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | 500,000 |
|
Total |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | 500,000 |
|
(1)Our Board of Directors, previouslywe are authorized theto repurchase of up to $500$500.0 million of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock through and including December 31, 2011. On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors extended2014. For the plan, such that we are currently authorized to make such repurchases through and includingyears ended December 31, 2012. Purchases under our2013, 2012 and 2011, we did not repurchase program may be made through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, subject to market conditions and other factors. We may elect not to purchase the maximum amount of shares allowableany common stock under this program and we may also enter into additional share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors.plan.
Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The accompanying consolidated financial statements for 20112013 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”United States ("GAAP"). included in our Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
On January 1, 2008, the Spin-off was completed. Within this report, we have included both “combined” financial statements prior to the Spin-off and “consolidated” financial statements following the Spin-off, as discussed below. Throughout the remainder of this report, we refer to both as “consolidated.” On June 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("the Hughes Acquisition"). As a result, Hughes became a new segment as a result ofand our historical financial statements on and after June 9, 2011 give effect to the Hughes AcquisitionAcquisition. Therefore, our financial position as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and the2011 is not comparable to our financial position as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are not comparable to our results of Hughes Communications are included in this report afteroperations for the acquisition date.years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. See Note 1315 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-Kreport for further discussion of the Hughes Acquisition.
Principles of Consolidation. We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Prior to Spin-off - Principles of Combination. The selected financial data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2007 are presented on a combined basis and principally represent the EchoStar Technologies segment business and certain other net assets. The assets and liabilities presented have been reflected on a historical basis, as prior to the Spin-off such assets and liabilities were 100% owned by DISH Network. Our historical selected financial data does not include the satellites, digital broadcast operations assets, certain real estate and other assets and related liabilities that were contributed to us by DISH Network in the Spin-off. Also, the selected financial data for 2007 does not include all of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had we been a stand-alone entity during the periods presented and do not reflect our combined results of operations, financial position and cash flows had we been a stand-alone company during that year. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
This data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto for the three years ended December 31, 2011, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.
The following tables present selected information relating to our consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the past five years. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this report.
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statements of Operations Data: | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | |||||||||||||||
Revenue | $ | 3,282,452 | $ | 3,121,704 | $ | 2,761,431 | $ | 2,350,369 | $ | 1,903,559 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses | 3,178,865 | 3,021,818 | 2,680,593 | 2,208,044 | 1,898,667 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | $ | 103,587 | $ | 99,886 | $ | 80,838 | $ | 142,325 | $ | 4,892 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | $ | 204,358 | $ | 364,704 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Basic and diluted net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | $ | 204,358 | $ | 364,704 | ||||||
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding | 89,405 | 87,150 | 86,223 | 85,084 | 85,765 | |||||||||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding | 90,952 | 87,959 | 87,089 | 85,203 | 86,059 | |||||||||||
Basic net income per share attributable to EchoStar | $ | 0.03 | $ | 2.42 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 2.40 | $ | 4.25 | ||||||
Diluted net income per share attributable to EchoStar | $ | 0.03 | $ | 2.40 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 2.40 | $ | 4.24 | ||||||
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
Statements of Operations Data: |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| |||||||||||||
Revenue |
| $ | 2,761,431 |
| $ | 2,350,369 |
| $ | 1,903,559 |
| $ | 2,150,520 |
| $ | 1,544,065 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
| 2,680,593 |
| 2,208,044 |
| 1,898,667 |
| 2,791,114 |
| 1,630,444 |
| |||||
Operating income (loss) |
| $ | 80,838 |
| $ | 142,325 |
| $ | 4,892 |
| $ | (640,594 | ) | $ | (86,379 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 3,639 |
| $ | 204,358 |
| $ | 364,704 |
| $ | (958,188 | ) | $ | (85,300 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 3,639 |
| $ | 204,358 |
| $ | 364,704 |
| $ | (958,188 | ) | $ | (85,300 | ) |
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding |
| 86,223 |
| 85,084 |
| 85,765 |
| 89,324 |
| 89,712 | (1) | |||||
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding |
| 87,089 |
| 85,203 |
| 86,059 |
| 89,324 |
| 89,712 | (1) | |||||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.04 |
| $ | 2.40 |
| $ | 4.25 |
| $ | (10.73 | ) | $ | (0.95 | ) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.04 |
| $ | 2.40 |
| $ | 4.24 |
| $ | (10.73 | ) | $ | (0.95 | ) |
| | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance Sheet Data: | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities | $ | 1,620,652 | $ | 1,547,565 | $ | 1,696,442 | $ | 1,130,900 | $ | 829,162 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 6,701,963 | $ | 6,600,233 | $ | 6,543,737 | $ | 3,842,020 | $ | 3,468,068 | ||||||
Total debt and capital lease obligations | $ | 2,422,388 | $ | 2,488,499 | $ | 2,528,654 | $ | 406,570 | $ | 439,399 | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | $ | 3,226,231 | $ | 3,150,227 | $ | 3,051,626 | $ | 3,013,190 | $ | 2,664,850 | ||||||
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash Flow Data: | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash flows from: | ||||||||||||||||
Operating activities | $ | 450,507 | $ | 505,149 | $ | 447,018 | $ | 404,015 | $ | 196,276 | ||||||
Investing activities | $ | (570,289 | ) | $ | (346,781 | ) | $ | (1,888,045 | ) | $ | (238,558 | ) | $ | (114,278 | ) | |
Financing activities | $ | 18,326 | $ | (43,976 | ) | $ | 1,913,547 | $ | (46,973 | ) | $ | (83,135 | ) | |||
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2007, basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using our shares outstanding as of January 1, 2008.
|
| As of December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and current marketable securities |
| $ | 1,696,442 |
| $ | 1,130,900 |
| $ | 829,162 |
| $ | 828,661 |
| $ | 532,267 |
|
Total assets |
| $ | 6,543,737 |
| $ | 3,842,020 |
| $ | 3,468,068 |
| $ | 2,889,799 |
| $ | 1,260,910 |
|
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
| $ | 2,534,262 |
| $ | 412,885 |
| $ | 446,369 |
| $ | 346,439 |
| $ | 3,709 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) |
| $ | 3,051,626 |
| $ | 3,013,190 |
| $ | 2,664,850 |
| $ | 2,211,586 |
| $ | 1,207,518 |
|
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
Cash Flow Data: |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| 2007 |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
Net cash flows from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Operating activities |
| $ | 447,018 |
| $ | 404,015 |
| $ | 196,276 |
| $ | 118,048 |
| $ | (88,109 | ) |
Investing activities |
| $ | (1,888,045 | ) | $ | (238,558 | ) | $ | (114,278 | ) | $ | (569,742 | ) | $ | (500,767 | ) |
Financing activities |
| $ | 1,913,547 |
| $ | (46,973 | ) | $ | (83,135 | ) | $ | 435,079 |
| $ | 600,337 |
|
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to our financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. This management’smanagement's discussion and analysis is intended to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in our financial condition and our results of our operations, and contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and uncertainties.assumptions. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results couldmay differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in this report, including under the caption “ItemItem 1A. Risk Factors”Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements contained in this report speak only as of the date of this report and we undertake no obligation to update them.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EchoStar Corporation (together with its subsidiaries is referred to as "EchoStar," the "Company," "we," "us" and/or "our") is a holding company, whose subsidiariesglobal provider of satellite operations, video delivery solutions, and broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments. We currently operate in three primarybusiness segments: the EchoStar Technologies segment, the Hughes segment, and the EchoStar Satellite Services segment, and the Hughes segment.
EchoStar Technologies Segment
Our EchoStar Technologies segment designs, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products and technology, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and cable companies and with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets. Slingbox “placeshifting” technology allows consumers to watch and control their home digital video and audio content via a broadband Internet connection. Mostinternational cable companies. A substantial majority of our digital set-top boxes are sold to DISH Network Corporation and its subsidiaries ("DISH Network"), but we also sell a significant number of digital set-top boxes to Bell TV in Canada, Dish Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. ("Dish Mexico") in Mexico and other international customers.
Our EchoStar Technologies segment also provides digital broadcast operations, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management, and other services, that are provided primarily to DISH Network. In addition, we provide our Slingboxes directly to consumers via retail outlets and online. Sling Media "placeshifting" technology can be used by a consumer, at his or her option, to watch and control their home digital video and audio content via a broadband internet connection.
We believe opportunities exist to expand our business by selling equipment and services in both the U.S. and international markets. As a result of our extensive experience with digital set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations, we are able to provide end-to-end pay-TV delivery systems incorporating our satellite and terrestrial backhaul capacity, customized digital set-top boxes and related components, and network design and management.
Dependence on DISH Network. We depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of the revenue for our EchoStar Technologies segment revenue and we expect that for the foreseeable future DISH Network will continue to be the primary source of revenue for our EchoStar Technologies segment. Therefore, ourthe results of operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment are, and will for the foreseeable future be closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’sNetwork's pay-TV service. EffectiveIn January 1, 2012, we entered into a new receiver agreement with DISH Network (the "2012 Receiver Agreement"), expiring on December 31, 2014, pursuant to which we are obligated to sell digital set-top boxes and related products to DISH Network until December 31, 2014. However, DISH Network is under nohas the right, but not the obligation, to purchase our digital set-top boxes or related products before or after this date. The receiver agreement allows DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from us either: (i) at a cost (decreasing as we reduce cost and increasing as our costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased. Under the receiver agreement,2012 Receiver Agreement, our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be impairedreduced if these costs increase. Based on our experience, we expect our cost of manufacturing a specific set-top box model to decline over time as our contract manufacturers generate efficiencies with scale of production and engineering cost reductions. In addition, whileour equipment revenue from DISH
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Network depends on the timing of orders for set-top boxes and accessories from DISH Network based on its actual and projected subscriber growth plans.
While we also expect to sell equipment to other customers, the number of potential new customers for our EchoStar Technologies segment is small and may be limited by our common ownership and related management with DISH Network, and our current customer concentration is likely to continue for the foreseeable future.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, DISH Network purchased fewer digital set-top boxes and related components from us. In addition, to the extent that DISH Network’s gross subscriber additions decrease or DISH Network experiences a net loss of subscribers, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a further material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
The impact to us of any decreases in DISH Network subscriber growth may be offset in the near term by an increase in sales to DISH Network resulting from the upgrade of DISH Network subscribers to advanced products such as HD receivers and HD DVRs, including our recently introduced whole-home HD DVR, as well as by the upgrade of DISH Network digital set-top boxes to new technologies such as MPEG-4 digital compression technology. However, there can be no assurance that any of these factors will mitigate any decreases in sales to DISH Network. In addition, although we expect DISH Network to continue to purchase products and services from us, there can be no assurance that these purchases will continue in the future.
We may experience significant pressure on margins we earn on the sale of digital set-top boxes and other equipment, including on sales to DISH Network. This pressure may be due to economic conditions, advancements in the technology and functionality of digital set-top boxes and other equipment. The margins we earn on sales are determined largely through periodic negotiations that could result in pricing reflecting, among other things, the digital set-top boxes and other equipment that best meet our customers’ current sales and marketing priorities, the product and service alternatives available from other equipment suppliers, and our ability to respond to customer requirements and to differentiate ourselves from other equipment suppliers on bases other than pricing.
Our future success may also depend on the extent to which prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network are willing to purchase products and services from us. Many of these customers may continue to view us as a competitor as a result ofdue to our common ownership and related management with DISH Network. If we do not develop relationships with new customers, we may not be able to expand our customer base and our ability to increase or maintain our revenue will be impacted.
Additional Challenges for our EchoStar Technologies Segment. We believe that our best opportunities for developing potential new customers for our EchoStar Technologies segment over the near term lie in international markets, including joint ventures. Thus, our efforts in expanding our digital set-top box business are focused on international markets and we therefore expect our performance in international markets to be a significant factor in determining whether we will be able to generate revenue and income growth in future periods. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sustain or grow our international business. In particular,are not actively seeking set-top box opportunities with United States ("U.S.") cable operators. Over the years, we have noticed an increase in new market entrants that offer low cost set-top boxes, including set-top boxes that are modeled after our products or products of our principal competitors. The entry of these new competitors may result in pricing pressure in international markets that we hope to enter. If market prices in international markets are substantially reduced by such new entrants, it may be difficult for us to make profitable sales in international markets. As a result, our ability to generate revenue and income growth in future periods depends greatly on our success in entering the international markets.
Furthermore, if we do notWe continue to distinguishfocus on building and strengthening our products through distinctive,brand recognition by providing unique and technologically advanced features and design,products, including internet delivery of video content, whole-home high definition digital video recorder ("HD DVR") receivers and MPEG-4 digital compression technology, to our customers. Products containing new technologies and features typically have higher initial selling prices and volumes. These volumes decline over time as well as continueDISH Network's demand is reduced due to build and strengthen our brand recognition, our business could be harmed as we may not be able to effectively compete on price alone in both domestic and international markets against low cost competitors.its use of refurbished equipment. Our ability to compete in the digital set-top box industry will also dependsuccess depends heavily on our ability to successfully bring advanced technologies including Internet delivery of video content, to market to keep pace with our competitors. IfThe revenue and associated margins we do not otherwise compete effectively, demand forearn on sales are determined largely through periodic negotiations that could result in prices reflecting, among other things, the digital set-top boxes and other equipment that best meet our products could decline, our gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, our revenuescustomers' current sales and earnings may declinemarketing priorities, the product and service alternatives available from other equipment suppliers, and our growth prospects would be diminished.
Sustained economic weaknessability to respond to customer requirements and volatile credit markets may cause certainto differentiate ourselves from other equipment suppliers that we rely on to cease operations, which, in turn, may cause us to suffer disruptions to our supply chain or incur higher production costs.bases other than pricing. Our ability to sustain or increase profitability will also depend in large part on our ability to control or reduce our costs of producing digital set-top boxes. The market for our digital set-top boxes, like other electronic products, has been characterized by regular reductions in selling prices and production costs. Therefore, we will likely be required to reduce production costs to maintain the margins we earn on digital set-top boxes and the profitability of our EchoStar Technologies segment. However, our ability to reduce production costs may be limited by, among other things, economic conditions and a shortage of available parts and may lead to inflated pricing. If we do not compete effectively, demand for our products could decline, our gross margins could decrease, we could lose market share, our revenue and earnings may decline and our growth prospects could be diminished.
Hughes Segment
Our Hughes segment is a global provider of broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments. The Hughes segment uses its two owned satellites, SPACEWAY 3 and EchoStar XVII, and additional satellite capacity acquired from multiple third-party providers to provide satellite broadband internet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the consumer market, and broadband network services and equipment to domestic and international enterprise markets. Our Hughes segment also provides managed services to large enterprises and solutions to customers for mobile satellite systems. We incorporate advances in technology to reduce costs and to increase the
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
functionality and reliability of our products and services. Through the usage of advanced spectrally efficient modulation and coding methodologies, proprietary software web acceleration and compression techniques, we continue to improve the efficiency of our networks. We invest in technologies to enhance our system and network management capabilities, specifically our managed services for enterprises. We also continue to invest in next generation technologies that can be applied to our future products and services.
Beginning in October 2012, we introduced HughesNet Gen4 broadband internet services to our customers in North America on EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012. Subsequently, in the fourth quarter of 2012, we enhanced our SPACEWAY 3 satellite platform to provide Gen4 services in regions of the U.S. that EchoStar XVII does not provide service. In October 2012, we entered into a distribution agreement (the "Distribution Agreement") with dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C ("dishNET"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, pursuant to which dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute the Hughes satellite internet service (the "Hughes service"). See Note 19 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion of our related party transactions with DISH Network.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Hughes segment had approximately 860,000 and 636,000 broadband subscribers, respectively of which, 635,000 and 588,000 were residential retail subscribers, respectively. These broadband subscribers include customers that subscribe to HughesNet broadband services, through retail, wholesale and small/medium enterprise service channels.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our Hughes segment had approximately $1.15 billion and $1.06 billion, respectively, of contracted revenue backlog. We define Hughes revenue backlog as our expected future revenue under customer contracts that are non-cancelable, excluding agreements with customers in our consumer market. Of the total contracted revenue backlog as of December 31, 2013, we expect to recognize approximately $383.1 million of revenue in 2014.
We continue our efforts in growing our consumer revenue, which depends on our success in adding new subscribers on our Hughes segment's satellite networks. Accordingly, we may need to adjust our service offerings in response to the offerings of our competitors, including ViaSat Communications, Inc. In addition, we focus on expanding our enterprise business, both domestically and internationally. However, the growth of the enterprise business relies heavily on global economic conditions.
EchoStar Satellite ServicesSegment
Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment usesoperates its business using ten of ourits owned and leased in-orbit satellites, and related FCC licenses toincluding EchoStar XVI launched in November 2012. We lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network, and secondarily to Dish Mexico, U.S. government service providers, state agencies, Internetinternet service providers, broadcast news
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
organizations, programmers and private enterprise customers. Furthermore, weWe continue to pursue expanding our business offerings by providing value added services such as telemetry, tracking and control services to third parties. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete against our competitors due to their significant resources and operating history.
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to satellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.285 billion and $1.054 billion, respectively, and contracted backlog attributable to satellites under construction of $621 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. Of these amounts, we expect approximately $230 million to be recognized in 2012.
Dependence on DISH Network. We depend on DISH Network for a substantialsignificant portion of the revenue for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment and we expect that DISH Network will continue to be the primary source of revenue for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment. Therefore, ourthe results of operations of our EchoStar Satellite Services segment are and will for the foreseeable future be closely linked to the performance of DISH Network’sNetwork's pay-TV service.
Whileservice as well as changes in DISH Network's satellite capacity requirements. In January 2013, we expectbegan to continue to provide satellite serviceslease EchoStar XVI to DISH Network for the foreseeable future, its satellite capacity requirements may change for a varietydelivery of reasons, includingdirect-to-home ("DTH") broadcast services to DISH Network customers in the launch of its own additional satellites.U.S. Any termination or reduction in the services we
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
provide to DISH Network would increase excess capacity on our satellites and require that we aggressively pursue alternative sources of revenue for this segment. Possible adverse effects on the EchoStar Technologies segment from DISH Network’s possible decline in gross subscriber additions are not expected to materially impact the revenue generated within theAs of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our EchoStar Satellite Services segment had contracted revenue backlog attributable to satellites currently in orbit of approximately $1.14 billion and $1.44 billion, respectively. Of the near term.total contracted revenue backlog as of December 31, 2013, we expect to recognize approximately $242.5 million of revenue in 2014.
In addition, becauseWhile we also expect to provide services to other customers, the number of potential new customers for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment is small our current customer concentration is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Our future successand may also depend on the extent to whichbe limited as prospective customers that have been competitors of DISH Network are willing to purchase services from us. Many of these customers may continue to view us as a competitor given thedue to our common ownership and management team we continue to share with DISH Network.
Additional Challenges for our EchoStar Satellite ServicesSegment. Our ability to expand revenuesrevenue in the EchoStar Satellite Services segment will likely require that we displace incumbent suppliers that generally have well established business models and often benefit from long-term contracts with their customers. As a result, to grow our EchoStar Satellite Services segment we may need to develop or otherwise acquire access to new satellite-delivered services so that we may offer differentiated services to prospective customers. However, there can be no assurance that we would be able to develop or otherwise acquire access to such differentiated services or develop the sales and marketing expertise necessary to sell such services profitably.
In addition, as our satellite fleet ages, we will be required to evaluate replacement alternatives such as acquiring, leasing or constructing additional satellites, with or without customer commitments for capacity, which may require us to seek additional financing. However, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to fund any such replacement alternatives on terms that would be attractive to us or at all.
Hughes Segment
On June 8, 2011, we completed the Hughes Acquisition, pursuant to the Hughes Agreement by and between us, certain of our subsidiaries, including EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., and Hughes Communications, Inc.. Pursuant to the Hughes Agreement, each issued and outstanding share of common stock and vested stock option of Hughes Communications, Inc. was converted into the right to receive $60.70 (minus any applicable exercise price) in cash and substantially all of the outstanding debt of Hughes Communications, Inc. was repaid. In addition, each share of unvested restricted stock and unvested stock option of Hughes Communications, Inc. was converted into the right to receive $60.70 (minus any applicable exercise price) in cash on the vesting date of the stock award. The funding of the Hughes Acquisition was supported by the issuance by HSS of $1.1 billion of 6 1/2% senior secured notes due 2019 and $900 million of 7 5/8% senior notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). See Note 13 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion. In addition to the debt securities issued, we contributed cash and marketable investment securities to, and forgave certain net intercompany accounts payable of, HSS, totaling $609 million. For information about the risks related to the Hughes Acquisition, please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Our Hughes segment provides satellite broadband Internet access to North American consumers, which we refer to as the consumer market, and broadband network services and systems to the domestic and international enterprise markets. Our Hughes segment also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems. We incorporate advances in technology to reduce costs and to increase the functionality and reliability of our products and services. Through the usage of advanced spectrally efficient modulation and coding methodologies, such as DVB-S2 and proprietary software web acceleration and compression techniques, we continue to improve the efficiency of our networks. In addition, we invest in technologies to enhance our system and network management capabilities, specifically our managed services for enterprises. We also continue to invest in next generation technologies that can be applied to our future products and services.
In June 2009, Hughes Communications, Inc. entered into a contract for construction of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, our next-generation, geostationary high throughput satellite. EchoStar XVII/Jupiter will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for the HughesNet consumer broadband Internet service in North America. We anticipate launching EchoStar XVII/Jupiter in the summer of 2012.
As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 626,000 customers that subscribe to our Hughes segment’s consumer and small/medium enterprise service. In addition, as of December 31, 2011, our Hughes segment had total revenue backlog, which we define as our expected future revenue under customer contracts that are non-cancelable and excluding agreements with our customers in our consumer market, of approximately $1.036 billion. Of this amount, we expect approximately $370 million to be recognized in 2012.
Additional Challenges for our Hughes Segment. Our ability to continue to grow our consumer revenue will depend on our success in adding new subscribers on our satellite network and successful launch and deployment of our EchoStar XVII/Jupiter satellite as planned. We may need to adjust our service offerings in response to the offerings of our competitors, including ViaSat Communications, following its commencement of service on the ViaSat-1 satellite which launched in October 2011. In addition, following the commencement of service on ViaSat-1 and prior to the commencement of service on EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, ViaSat Communications may be in a better position to offer faster connection speeds more economically than us, which could adversely impact our ability to add new subscribers and our consumer revenues.
An additional focus in this business is our ability to grow our revenue in the enterprise business, both domestically and internationally. The growth of the enterprise business is also impacted by global economic conditions.
International DTH Platforms
During 2008, we entered into a joint venture with Dish Mexico. Pursuant to these arrangements, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to Dish Mexico. We sold $63 million, $81 million and $36 million of digital set-top boxes and related components and $9 million, $9 million and $8 million of satellite services to Dish Mexico during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We also sold $8 million and less than $1 million of uplink services to Dish Mexico during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. We did not have any uplink sales to Dish Mexico during the year ended December 31, 2009.
New Business Opportunities
We are exploring opportunities to selectively pursue partnerships, joint ventures and strategic acquisition opportunities, domestically and internationally. We believe that we believeinvestments in these types of opportunities may allow us to increase our existing market share, expand into new markets, broaden our portfolio of products and intellectual property, and strengthen our relationships with our customers. With our extensive experience in designing, developing, and distributing digital set-top boxes and broadband related products, we can leverage the broader adoption of advanced technologies to create opportunities for us. We believe that DTH and satellite broadband services are particularly well-suited for countries without extensive telecommunications and cable infrastructure, and we intend to continue to seek new investments and customer relationships with international DTH service and satellite broadband service providers.
Move Networks Acquisition
On December 31, 2010,In 2012, we acquired certain assetsthe right to use various frequencies at the 45 degree west longitude orbital location ("Brazilian Authorization") from ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory agency. The Brazilian Authorization is intended for use in providing pay-TV services in Brazil. In September 2013, we announced that we were in discussions with GVT, a subsidiary of Move Networks, Inc. for $45 million. These assets include patented technology that enablesVivendi S.A., to form a joint venture to provide pay-TV services in Brazil with the adaptive deliveryobjective to offer a national service using IPTV and satellite distribution. In December 2013, we ceased our discussions with GVT, but we remain committed to delivering a unique pay-TV service to Brazil via a high-powered Broadcast Satellite Service ("BSS") satellite.
In December 2013, we acquired 100.0% of video content viaSolaris Mobile, which is based in Dublin, Ireland and licensed by the Internet which will allow usEuropean Union ("EU") and individual EU Member States to provide mobile satellite services and complementary ground component services covering the entire EU using S-band spectrum. We believe we are well-positioned to commercialize this license due to our access to the TerreStar-2
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
expand our portfolio of advanced technologies serving cable, satellite, telecommunications companies and IPTV video providers.
Adverse Economic Conditions
OurS-band satellite as well as the mobile satellite systems technology expertise of our Hughes segment. In December 2013, we amended the T2 Development Agreement with DISH Network to provide for the ability to grow or maintainpurchase the TerreStar-2 satellite, which is designed to provide mobile services using S-band frequencies. Through the acquisition of Solaris Mobile and the S-band spectrum and our business may be adversely affected by weak global and domestic economic conditions, including wavering consumer confidence and constraints on discretionary purchasing, unemployment, tight credit markets, declinesexpertise in global and domestic stock markets, falling home prices and other factors that may adversely affectdeveloping mobile satellite infrastructures, we expect to accelerate advanced mobile services throughout the markets in which we operate. Our ability to increase our income or to generate additional revenues will depend in part on our ability to organically grow our businesses, identify and successfully exploit opportunities to acquire other businesses or technologies, and enter into strategic partnerships. These activities may require significant additional capital that may not be available on terms that would be attractive to us or at all. In particular, volatile credit markets, which have significantly impacted the availability and cost of financing, specifically in the leveraged finance markets, may significantly constrain our ability to obtain financing to support our growth initiatives. These developments in the credit markets may increase our cost of financing and impair our liquidity position. In addition, these developments may cause us to defer or abandon business strategies and transactions that we would otherwise pursue if financing were available on acceptable terms.EU.
Furthermore, unfavorable events in the economy, including deterioration in the credit and equity markets could cause consumer demand for pay-TV services and consequently sales of our digital set-top boxes to DISH Network, Bell TV, Dish Mexico and other international customers to decline materially because consumers may delay purchasing decisions or reduce or reallocate their discretionary spending, which would also have an adverse effect on our Hughes segment.
Basis of Presentation
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations, financial condition and liquidity are presented on a historical basis. Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 also include those of Hughes Communications after June 8, 2011, the date of completion of the Hughes Acquisition. Therefore, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 are not comparable to our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
EXPLANATION OF KEY METRICS AND OTHER ITEMS
Equipment revenuerevenue—DISH Network. — DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — "Equipment revenue—DISH Network”Network" primarily includes sales of digital set-top boxes and related components, to DISH Network, including Slingboxes and related hardware products.products, and sales of satellite broadband equipment and related equipment, primarily related to the Hughes service, to DISH Network.
Equipment revenue - revenue—other. “Equipment revenue - other”"Equipment revenue—other" primarily includes sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to Bell TV, Dish Mexico and other domestic and international customers, including sales of Slingboxes and related hardware products. “Equipment revenue - other” also includes the saleproducts, and sales of broadband equipment and networks to customers in our enterprise and consumer markets.
Services and other revenue —revenue—DISH Network.DISH Network. “Services"Services and other revenue — revenue—DISH Network”Network" primarily includes revenue associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, development of web-based applications for set-top boxes, professional services, facilities rental revenue and other services provided to DISH Network. Beginning in October 2012, "Services and other revenue—DISH Network" also includes subscriber wholesale service fees for the Hughes service sold to dishNET.
Services and other revenue - revenue—other.“Services "Services and other revenue - other”revenue—other" primarily includes the salesales of enterprise and consumer broadband services, as well as maintenance and other contracted services. “Services"Services and other revenue - other”revenue—other" also includes revenue associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking and other services provided to customers other than DISH Network.
Cost of sales — sales—equipment. “Cost"Cost of sales — equipment”sales—equipment" principally includes costs associated with digital set-top boxes and related components sold to DISH Network, Bell TV, Dish Mexico and other domestic and international customers, including costs associated with Slingboxes and related hardware products. “Cost"Cost of sales — equipment”
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
sales—equipment" also includes the cost of broadband equipment and networks sold to customers in our enterprise and consumer markets.markets, and to DISH Network.
Cost of sales - sales—services and other. “Cost"Cost of sales — sales—services and other”other" primarily includes the cost of broadband services provided to our enterprise and consumer customers, and to DISH Network, as well as the cost of providing maintenance and other contracted services. “Cost"Cost of sales — sales—services and other”other" also includes the costs associated with satellite and transponder leasing, satellite uplinking/downlinking, signal processing, conditional access management, telemetry, tracking and control, product support and development of applications for set-top boxes, professional services, facilities rental revenuecosts, and other services.services provided to our customers, including DISH Network.
Research and development expenses. “Research"Research and development expenses” consistexpenses" primarily ofincludes costs associated with the design and development of products to support future growth by reducing costs and providingprovide new technology and innovationsinnovation to our customers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. “Selling,"Selling, general and administrative expenses”expenses" primarily includes selling and marketing costs and employee-related costs associated with administrative services (i.e.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
(e.g., information systems, human resources and other services), including non-cash, stock-based compensation expense. It also includes professional fees (i.e.,(e.g. legal, information systems and accounting services) and other items associated with facilities and administrative services provided by DISH Network and other third parties.
Impairment of long-lived asset.assets. “Impairment"Impairment of long-lived asset” consists of anassets" includes our impairment of our CMBStar satellite. See Note 6 in the Noteslosses related to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets.
Interest income.“Interest income” "Interest income" primarily includes interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities, including accretion on debt securities.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalizedcapitalized.. “Interest"Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized”capitalized" primarily includes interest expense associated with our long-term debt and capital lease obligations (net of capitalized interest), and amortization of debt issuance costs.
Unrealized and realizedRealized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments. investments, net. “Unrealized and realized"Realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” consistsinvestments, net" primarily includes gains, net of gains andany losses, realized on the sale or exchange of investments and “other-than-temporary” impairments of marketable and other investment securities.investments.
Unrealized gains (losses)Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net. “Unrealized gains (losses) "Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net” consists ofnet" includes realized and unrealized gains and losses from changes in fair value of marketable and othercertain strategic investments accounted for at fair value.
Other, net. The primary components of “Other, net” are transaction costs related to acquisitions and equityEquity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net. "Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net" includes earnings or losses from our investments accounted for under the equity method.
Other, net. "Other, net" primarily includes foreign exchange gains and losses, dividends received from our marketable investment securities and other non-operating income or expense items that are not appropriately classified elsewhere in our Consolidated Statements of our affiliates.Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”("EBITDA"). EBITDA is defined as “Net"Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar” plus “InterestEchoStar" excluding "Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” net of “Interestcapitalized," "Interest income,” “Income taxes”" "Income tax benefit (provision), net" and “Depreciation"Depreciation and amortization.”" EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP. This “non-GAAP measure”non-GAAP measure is reconciled to “Net"Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar”EchoStar" in our discussion of “Results"Results of Operations”Operations" below. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity and the underlying operating performance of our business. Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors, and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industries.industry.
53Subscribers. Subscribers include customers that subscribe to our Hughes segment's HughesNet broadband services, through retail, wholesale and small/medium enterprise service channels.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Basis of Presentation
The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated results of operations is presented on a historical basis.
Year Ended December 31, 20112013 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010.2012
|
| For the Years Ended |
|
|
| |||||||
|
| December 31, |
| Variance |
| |||||||
Statements of Operations Data |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| Amount |
| % |
| |||
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Equipment revenue - DISH Network |
| $ | 1,158,293 |
| $ | 1,470,173 |
| $ | (311,880 | ) | (21.2 | ) |
Equipment revenue - other |
| 513,504 |
| 347,765 |
| 165,739 |
| 47.7 |
| |||
Services and other revenue - DISH Network |
| 496,636 |
| 468,399 |
| 28,237 |
| 6.0 |
| |||
Services and other revenue - other |
| 592,998 |
| 64,032 |
| 528,966 |
|
| * | |||
Total revenue |
| 2,761,431 |
| 2,350,369 |
| 411,062 |
| 17.5 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales - equipment |
| 1,414,791 |
| 1,553,129 |
| (138,338 | ) | (8.9 | ) | |||
% of Total equipment revenue |
| 84.6 | % | 85.4 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales - services and other |
| 492,702 |
| 236,356 |
| 256,346 |
|
| * | |||
% of Total services and other revenue |
| 45.2 | % | 44.4 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Research and development expenses |
| 50,966 |
| 46,093 |
| 4,873 |
| 10.6 |
| |||
% of Total revenue |
| 1.8 | % | 2.0 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 303,276 |
| 143,555 |
| 159,721 |
|
| * | |||
% of Total revenue |
| 11.0 | % | 6.1 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 385,894 |
| 228,911 |
| 156,983 |
| 68.6 |
| |||
Impairment of long-lived asset |
| 32,964 |
| — |
| 32,964 |
|
| * | |||
Total costs and expenses |
| 2,680,593 |
| 2,208,044 |
| 472,549 |
| 21.4 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
| 80,838 |
| 142,325 |
| (61,487 | ) | (43.2 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest income |
| 10,821 |
| 14,472 |
| (3,651 | ) | (25.2 | ) | |||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
| (82,593 | ) | (14,560 | ) | (68,033 | ) |
| * | |||
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments |
| 13,666 |
| 2,923 |
| 10,743 |
|
| * | |||
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net |
| 15,871 |
| 144,473 |
| (128,602 | ) | (89.0 | ) | |||
Other, net |
| (12,828 | ) | (860 | ) | (11,968 | ) |
| * | |||
Total other income (expense) |
| (55,063 | ) | 146,448 |
| (201,511 | ) |
| * | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
| 25,775 |
| 288,773 |
| (262,998 | ) | (91.1 | ) | |||
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
| (21,501 | ) | (84,415 | ) | 62,914 |
| 74.5 |
| |||
Effective tax rate |
| 83.4 | % | 29.2 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Net income (loss) |
| 4,274 |
| 204,358 |
| (200,084 | ) | (97.9 | ) | |||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| 635 |
| — |
| 635 |
|
| * | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 3,639 |
| $ | 204,358 |
| $ | (200,719 | ) | (98.2 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
EBITDA |
| $ | 482,806 |
| $ | 517,772 |
| $ | (34,966 | ) | (6.8 | ) |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statements of Operations Data | 2013 | 2012 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||
Equipment revenue—DISH Network | $ | 1,311,446 | $ | 1,028,588 | $ | 282,858 | 27.5 | ||||||
Equipment revenue—other | 347,910 | 621,495 | (273,585 | ) | (44.0 | ) | |||||||
Services and other revenue—DISH Network | 620,189 | 515,176 | 105,013 | 20.4 | |||||||||
Services and other revenue—other | 1,002,907 | 956,445 | 46,462 | 4.9 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | 3,282,452 | 3,121,704 | 160,748 | 5.1 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Costs and Expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales—equipment | 1,430,777 | 1,397,512 | 33,265 | 2.4 | |||||||||
% of Total equipment revenue | 86.2 | % | 84.7 | % | |||||||||
Cost of sales—services and other | 776,121 | 691,922 | 84,199 | 12.2 | |||||||||
% of Total services and other revenue | 47.8 | % | 47.0 | % | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | |||||||||||||
expenses (including DISH Network) | 358,499 | 372,644 | (14,145 | ) | (3.8 | ) | |||||||
% of Total revenue | 10.9 | % | 11.9 | % | |||||||||
Research and development expenses | 67,942 | 69,649 | (1,707 | ) | (2.5 | ) | |||||||
% of Total revenue | 2.1 | % | 2.2 | % | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 507,111 | 457,326 | 49,785 | 10.9 | |||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 38,415 | 32,765 | 5,650 | 17.2 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | 3,178,865 | 3,021,818 | 157,047 | 5.2 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | 103,587 | 99,886 | 3,701 | 3.7 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | |||||||||||||
Interest income | 14,656 | 11,176 | 3,480 | 31.1 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | (192,554 | ) | (153,029 | ) | (39,525 | ) | 25.8 | ||||||
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net | 38,341 | 177,558 | (139,217 | ) | (78.4 | ) | |||||||
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net | (5,024 | ) | (438 | ) | (4,586 | ) | * | ||||||
Other, net | 6,958 | 59,531 | (52,573 | ) | (88.3 | ) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | (137,623 | ) | 94,798 | (232,421 | ) | * | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | (34,036 | ) | 194,684 | (228,720 | ) | * | |||||||
Income tax benefit, net | 37,437 | 16,329 | 21,108 | * | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | 3,401 | 211,013 | (207,612 | ) | (98.4 | ) | |||||||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 876 | (35 | ) | 911 | * | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | (208,523 | ) | (98.8 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Data: | |||||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 650,097 | $ | 793,898 | $ | (143,801 | ) | (18.1 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subscribers, end of period | 860,000 | 636,000 | 224,000 | 35.2 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
Equipment revenue — revenue—DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — "Equipment revenue—DISH Network”Network" totaled $1.158$1.31 billion duringfor the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease2013, an increase of $312$282.9 million or 21.2%27.5%, compared to the same period in 2010. This change related2012.
Equipment revenue—DISH Network from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $237.5 million, or 23.6%, to $1.24 billion compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 was primarily due to a decreasean increase of 44.7% in unit sales of set-top boxes, offset partially offset by an increasea 9.2% decrease in the weighted average revenue perprice of set-top boxes. Additionally, unit due to a change in sales mix towards higher end models like HD DVRs. Pursuant toof related accessories and the receiver agreement in effect during 2011,weighted average price of related accessories increased 5.8% and 4.5%, respectively. Our EchoStar Technologies segment offers multiple set-top boxes with different price points depending on their capabilities and functionalities. The revenue and associated margins we earn on sales are sold to DISH Network at cost plus a fixed margin, resultingdetermined largely through periodic negotiations that could result in a decline in revenue per unit when lower set-top box costs are incurred.
Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a new receiver agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we are obligated to sell digitalprices reflecting, among other things, the set-top boxes and relatedother equipment that meet our customers' current sales and marketing priorities, the product and service alternatives available from other equipment suppliers, our ability to respond to customer requirements, and to differentiate ourselves from other equipment suppliers on bases other than pricing. In addition, products to containing new technologies and features typically have higher initial prices, which decline over time as a result of manufacturing efficiencies.
Equipment revenue—DISH Network until December 31, 2014 (the “2012 Receiver Agreement”). However, DISH Network is under no obligation to purchasefrom our digital set-top boxes or related products before or after this date. The 2012 Receiver Agreement allows DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from us either: (i) at a cost (decreasing as we reduce cost and increasing as costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased. Under the 2012 Receiver Agreement our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be impaired if these costs increase. At the commencement of the 2012 Receiver Agreement, the aggregate pricingHughes segment for the digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment sold under the 2012 Receiver Agreement was substantially the same as the aggregate pricing for the products and equipment sold under the prior receiver agreement at the time of its expiration. There can be no assurance that, over the long term, aggregate pricing under the 2012 Receiver Agreement will be substantially the same as it was under the prior receiver agreement.
Equipment revenue - other. “Equipment revenue - other” totaled $514 million during the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $1662013 increased by $45.4 million or 47.7% compared to the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily related to revenue of $161 million contributed by our Hughes segment from the sale of broadband equipment and networks to customers in our enterprise and consumer markets.
Services and other revenue - other. “Services and other revenue - other” totaled $593 million during the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $529$69.1 million compared to the same period in 2010. This2012. The increase was primarily relateddue to services revenue of $513 million contributed by our Hughes segment from the salecommencement of broadband servicesequipment sales to customersDISH Network pursuant to the Distribution Agreement we entered into with dishNET in our enterprise and consumer markets, and customers’ maintenance and other contracted services.October 2012 such that a full year of revenue has been included in the 2013 period.
Cost of sales — equipmentEquipment revenue—other.. “Cost of sales — equipment”"Equipment revenue—other" totaled $1.415 billion during$347.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, a decrease of $138$273.6 million or 8.9%44.0%, compared to the same period in 2010. This change primarily resulted from a decrease in sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network, partially offset by a $128 million increase in costs associated with the sale of broadband equipment and networks sold to customers in our enterprise and consumer markets2012.
Equipment revenue—other from our Hughes segment. “Cost of sales — equipment” represented 84.6% and 85.4% of total equipment revenueEchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 20112013 decreased by $212.8 million, or 58.2%, to $153.1 million compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 54.7% decrease in unit sales and 2010, respectively. The improvementa 20.6% decrease in the expenseweighted average price of set-top boxes sold to Bell TV and our other international customers. Additionally, unit sales and the weighted average price of related accessories sold to Bell TV and our other international customers decreased 16.1% and 38.8%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The sales to Bell TV and other international customers may remain at the current levels in the near term, due to customer utilization of refurbished set-top boxes and lower overall demand in the respective markets that we sell these products.
Equipment revenue—other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $61.5 million, or 24.0%, to $194.7 million compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in sales of mobile satellite systems equipment of $30.4 million and international broadband equipment of $29.5 million.
Services and other revenue—DISH Network. "Services and other revenue—DISH Network" totaled $620.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $105.0 million or 20.4%, compared to the same period in 2012.
Services and other revenue—DISH Network from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $31.5 million, or 11.6%, to $303.7 million compared to the
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $15.3 million in revenue earned from the sales of satellite uplink/downlink services and $16.9 million related to product support and development of applications for set-top boxes.
Services and other revenue—DISH Network from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $34.5 million to $44.8 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to revenue ratio principally resultedearned pursuant to the Distribution Agreement we entered into with dishNET in October 2012.
Services and other revenue—DISH Network from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $45.9 million, or 22.8%, to $247.2 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was mainly due to a $99.2 million increase in revenue related to the lease of capacity on the EchoStar XVI satellite which began in January 2013 and services provided on the lease of transponders of the Quetzsat-1 satellite to DISH Network beginning in February 2013. This increase was partially offset by a $43.7 million decrease relating to the expiration of our satellite capacity lease agreement for the EchoStar VI satellite, a $5.1 million decrease relating to the renewal of our satellite capacity agreement for the EchoStar VIII satellite, and a $5.3 million decrease in revenue related to DISH Network's use of our right to the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location.
Services and other revenue—other. "Services and other revenue—other" totaled $1.00 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $46.5 million or 4.9%, compared to the same period in 2012.
Services and other revenue—other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $41.1 million, or 4.7%, to $909.6 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales of broadband services in our enterprise and consumer markets.
Services and other revenue—other from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $6.4 million, or 8.3%, to $82.9 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was mainly due to an increase of $6.4 million in sales of transponder services.
Cost of sales—equipment. "Cost of sales—equipment" totaled $1.43 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $33.3 million, or 2.4%, compared to the same period in 2012.
Cost of sales—equipment from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $28.8 million, or 2.5%, to $1.19 billion compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was attributable to an increase in equipment costs of $199.3 million, related directly to the increase in sales of set-top boxes and related accessories to DISH Network. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in cost of sales of $168.9 million, primarily related to a decrease in sales of set-top boxes and related componentsaccessories to DISH Network which have lower margins as sales are at cost plus a fixed margin.our international customers.
Cost of sales — services and other. “Cost of sales — services and other” totaled $493 million duringsales—equipment from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $2562013 increased by $4.4 million, or 1.9%, to $237.1 million compared to the same period in 2010. This change2012. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the cost of broadband equipment sold to our wholesale customers of $35.7 million. The increase was primarily offset by a decrease in cost of sales of $17.2 million, due to the decrease in cost of sales of mobile satellite systems equipment and a decrease of $14.3 million in cost of sales related to international broadband equipment.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Cost of sales—services and other. "Cost of sales—services and other" totaled $776.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $84.2 million, or 12.2%, compared to the same period in 2012.
Cost of sales—services and other from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $31.0 million, or 16.4%, to $219.7 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to a $22.8 million increase in engineering services costs provided in 2013 compared to 2012 and a $4.2 million increase in uplink/downlink costs.
Cost of sales—services and other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $28.4 million, or 6.7%, to $450.3 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase includes a $23.9 million increase in cost of sales related to an increase in sales of broadband services in our consumer and enterprise markets and a $4.4 million increase in cost of sales primarily related to coststhe Distribution Agreement we entered into with dishNET in October 2012.
Cost of $236sales—services and other from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $4.0 million, or 6.5%, to $56.9 million compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to an $8.4 million decrease in lease expense due to the termination of our satellite lease agreement with DISH Network for EchoStar I in July 2012, partially offset by a $4.4 million increase in cost of sales related to the increase in transponder revenue in 2013.
Cost of sales—services and other related to our other operations and business development activities for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $28.8 million compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to the commencement of our operating lease of the EchoStar XV satellite capacity from DISH Network in May 2013.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. "Selling, general and administrative expenses" totaled $358.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $14.1 million or 3.8%, compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was mainly due to a $21.6 million decrease in general and administrative expenses as a result of an increase in services billed to DISH Network, a $11.5 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses, a $3.9 million decrease in professional services, and a $3.8 million decrease in professional services provided to us by DISH Network pursuant to our related party agreements. These decreases in general and administrative expenses were partially offset by higher marketing and advertising expenses of $21.8 million incurred primarily by our Hughes segment and an increase of $4.8 million in personnel and other employee-related expenses.
Depreciation and amortization. "Depreciation and amortization" expense totaled $507.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $49.8 million or 10.9%, compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily related to an increase in depreciation of $25.3 million from our Hughes segment related to depreciation from EchoStar XVII, which was placed into service in October 2012, an increase of $24.4 million in depreciation from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment, primarily due to the depreciation of EchoStar XVI, which was placed into service in January 2013, and a $17.4 million increase in depreciation associated with customer rental equipment. These increases in depreciation were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation of $13.5 million on EchoStar VI, which was fully depreciated in August 2012, and a decrease in depreciation of $5.7 million on EchoStar XII due to the impairment of the satellite's carrying amount in the second quarter of 2013.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Impairment of long-lived assets. "Impairment of long-lived assets" totaled $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $5.7 million or 17.2%, compared to the same period in 2012. Impairment losses in 2013 consisted of a $34.7 million impairment of our EchoStar XII satellite and a $3.8 million impairment of goodwill of our EchoStar Technologies segment. Impairment losses in 2012 consisted of a $22.0 million impairment of certain contract rights of our Hughes segment, a $6.6 million impairment of goodwill of our EchoStar Technologies segment, and a $4.2 million impairment of certain regulatory authorizations.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. "Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized" totaled $192.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $39.5 million or 25.8%, compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was mainly due to a $45.1 million decrease in capitalized interest associated with the EchoStar XVII and EchoStar XVI satellites which were placed into service in October 2012 and January 2013, respectively, partially offset by the capitalization of interest expense of $4.0 million primarily related to the construction of the EchoStar XIX and the TerreStar-2 satellites in 2013.
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net. "Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates, net" was $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a $4.6 million increase compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily attributable to a $6.3 million increase in our one-third share of losses incurred by DISH Digital Holding, L.L.C., which commenced operations in July 2012.
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net. "Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net" totaled $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $139.2 million or 78.4%, compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was mainly related to a decrease in gains of $136.4 million recognized on the sale of certain strategic investments in public companies in 2012.
Other, net. "Other, net" totaled $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $52.6 million, or 88.3%, compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily related to a non-recurring dividend of $46.0 million received from a strategic investment in 2012 and a $5.9 million decrease in gains arising from reductions of the capital lease obligation for the AMC-16 satellite as a result of a partial loss of satellite capacity.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $650.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $143.8 million, or 18.1%, compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in gains of $139.2 million recognized from the sale of certain strategic investments in several public companies in 2012, a non-recurring dividend of $46.0 million received from a strategic investment in 2012, a decrease in gains of $5.9 million arising from reductions of the capital lease obligation for the AMC-16 satellite in 2012, and a decrease of $4.6 million in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates. These decreases were partially offset by a
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
$53.5 million increase in operating income, exclusive of depreciation and amortization. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying financial statements.
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 650,097 | $ | 793,898 | $ | (143,801 | ) | (18.1 | ) | ||||
Interest income and expense, net | (177,898 | ) | (141,853 | ) | (36,045 | ) | 25.4 | ||||||
Income tax benefit, net | 37,437 | 16,329 | 21,108 | * | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (507,111 | ) | (457,326 | ) | (49,785 | ) | 10.9 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | (208,523 | ) | (98.8 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit, net. Income tax benefit totaled $37.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $21.1 million, compared to the same period in 2012. Our effective income tax rate was 110.0% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to (8.4%) for the same period in 2012. The variation in our current year effective tax rate from a U.S. federal statutory rate for the current period was primarily due to the release of the valuation allowance associated with capital loss carryforwards in conjunction with the sale of certain of our capital investments, current year research and experimentation credits, and the reinstatement of the research and experimentation tax credit for 2012, as provided by the American Taxpayer Relief Act enacted on January 2, 2013. For the same period in 2012, the variation from a U.S. federal statutory rate was primarily attributable to the release of the valuation allowance associated with the sale of broadband services providedcertain capital investments. In addition, significant fluctuation in the effective tax rate from a U.S. federal statutory rate resulted from our pre-tax losses in the current year.
Net income attributable to customersEchoStar. Net income attributable to EchoStar was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $208.5 million, or 98.8%, compared to the same period in our enterprise and consumer markets, and customers’ maintenance2012. The change was primarily due to a decrease in gains of $139.2 million recognized from the sale of marketable investment securities and other contracted servicesinvestments in 2012, a gain recognized in 2012 associated with a non-recurring dividend of $46.0 million received from our Hughes segment. “Costa strategic investment that was not received in 2013, a decrease in capitalized interest of sales — services$45.1 million associated with EchoStar XVII and other” represented 45.2%EchoStar XVI, which were placed into service in October 2012 and 44.4%January 2013, respectively, and a decrease in other income of total services$5.9 million as a result of a reduction of the capital lease obligation for the AMC-16 satellite when compared to the same period in 2012. These reductions were offset partially by an increase of $21.1 million in income tax benefit, the capitalization of interest expense of $4.0 million primarily related to the construction of the EchoStar XIX and otherthe TerreStar-2 satellites in 2013, and an increase in operating income of $3.7 million.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Segment Operating Results and Capital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2012
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 | EchoStar Technologies | Hughes | EchoStar Satellite Services | All Other and Eliminations | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,715,991 | $ | 1,218,126 | $ | 330,177 | $ | 18,158 | $ | 3,282,452 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 56,935 | $ | 186,561 | $ | 12,700 | $ | 135,677 | $ | 391,873 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 136,057 | $ | 281,513 | $ | 235,993 | $ | (3,466 | ) | $ | 650,097 | |||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,660,029 | $ | 1,158,714 | $ | 277,985 | $ | 24,976 | $ | 3,121,704 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 69,809 | $ | 292,222 | $ | 118,998 | $ | 31,976 | $ | 513,005 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 110,933 | $ | 265,756 | $ | 212,549 | $ | 204,660 | $ | 793,898 | ||||||
EchoStar Technologies Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,715,991 | $ | 1,660,029 | $ | 55,962 | 3.4 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 56,935 | $ | 69,809 | $ | (12,874 | ) | (18.4 | ) | ||||
EBITDA | $ | 136,057 | $ | 110,933 | $ | 25,124 | 22.6 | ||||||
Revenue
EchoStar Technologies segment total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The2013 increased by $56.0 million, or 3.4%, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily as a result of a $269.0 million increase in the expenseboth equipment and service revenue provided to DISH Network, offset partially by a $213.1 million decrease in other equipment and service revenue ratio principally resulted from an increaseprimarily due to a decrease in revenuesales of set-top boxes and expenses fromrelated accessories to Bell TV and our Hughes segment.other international customers.
Capital Expenditures
Selling, general and administrative expenses. “Selling, general and administrative expenses” totaled $303 million duringEchoStar Technologies segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013 decreased by $12.9 million, or 18.4%, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to lower capital requirements related to our digital broadcast center and network operations.
EBITDA
EchoStar Technologies segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $136.1 million, an increase of $160$25.1 million, or 22.6%, compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in EBITDA for our EchoStar Technologies segment was primarily driven by a $27.3 million increase in operating income offset partially by a decrease of $1.7 million in gains on the sale of investments compared to the same period in 2012.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Hughes Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,218,126 | $ | 1,158,714 | $ | 59,412 | 5.1 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 186,561 | $ | 292,222 | $ | (105,661 | ) | (36.2 | ) | ||||
EBITDA | $ | 281,513 | $ | 265,756 | $ | 15,757 | 5.9 | ||||||
Revenue
Hughes segment total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $59.4 million, or 5.1%, compared to the same period in 2012. This increase was primarily due to an increase in both service and hardware revenue from DISH Network of $34.5 million and $45.4 million, respectively. This increase in revenue from DISH Network was primarily a result of an increase in sales of broadband equipment and services pursuant to the Distribution Agreement we entered into with dishNET in October 2012. Also contributing to the increase in our Hughes segment revenue was an increase of $41.1 million of other service revenue related to an increase in sales of broadband services. These increases were offset partially by a decrease of $61.5 million in equipment revenue as a result of a decrease in sales of mobile satellite systems equipment and international broadband equipment.
Capital Expenditures
Hughes segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $105.7 million, or 36.2%, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to a decrease in satellite expenditures related to EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012.
EBITDA
EBITDA for our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $281.5 million, an increase of $15.8 million, or 5.9%, compared to the same period in 2012. The increase was due primarily to a $22.0 million impairment loss in 2012 on certain contract rights associated with the Hughes Acquisition that did not occur in 2013 and a gain of $2.6 million in connection with the settlement of certain accounts receivables in 2013. These increases were offset partially by a decrease in gains on marketable investment securities of $10.5 million compared to the same period in 2010. This change2012.
EchoStar Satellite Services Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 330,177 | $ | 277,985 | $ | 52,192 | 18.8 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 12,700 | $ | 118,998 | $ | (106,298 | ) | (89.3 | ) | ||||
EBITDA | $ | 235,993 | $ | 212,549 | $ | 23,444 | 11.0 | ||||||
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Revenue
EchoStar Satellite Services segment total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $52.2 million, or 18.8%, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily resulted fromdue to an increase in sales of transponder services to DISH Network.
Capital Expenditures
EchoStar Satellite Services segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $106.3 million, or 89.3%, compared to the same period in 2012, primarily related to a decrease in satellite expenditures due to the launch of EchoStar XVI in November 2012.
EBITDA
EchoStar Satellite Services segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $236.0 million, an increase of $23.4 million, or 11.0%, compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in EBITDA for our EchoStar Satellite Services segment was primarily due to a $64.1 million increase in operating income excluding depreciation and amortization and impairment losses primarily related to an increase in the sales of transponder services provided in 2013 compared to 2012 and a decrease in cost of sales related to the termination of our satellite lease contract with DISH Network on EchoStar I, which was effective in July 2012. The increase in operating income was partially offset by the impairment loss of our EchoStar XII satellite of $34.7 million in June 2013 and a decrease in gains of $5.9 million as a result of a reduction of the capital lease obligation for the AMC-16 satellite when compared to the same period in 2012.
All Other and Eliminations
All Other and Eliminations accounts for certain items and activities in our Consolidated Financial Statements that have not been assigned to our operating segments. These include real estate and other activities, costs incurred in satellite development programs and other business development activities, expenses of various corporate departments, and our centralized treasury activities, including income from our investment portfolio and interest expense on our debt.
Capital Expenditures
For the year ended December 31, 2013 capital expenditures increased by $103.7 million compared to the same period in 2012, primarily related to the increase in satellite expenditures on the EchoStar XIX satellite of $100.8 million and the TerreStar-2 satellite of $13.9 million. The EchoStar XIX satellite is expected to be used in the operations of our Hughes segment and the TerreStar-2 satellite is intended to be used by Solaris Mobile in providing mobile satellite services in the EU.
EBITDA
All Other and Eliminations EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2013 was a loss of $3.5 million, compared to income of $204.7 million for the same period in 2012. The $208.1 million decrease in EBITDA was primarily due to a decrease in gains of $126.1 million recognized from the sale of marketable investment securities and other investments in 2012 and non-recurring dividends of $46.0 million received from a strategic investment in 2012.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011
Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 does not include the operations of Hughes Communications prior to June 8, 2011, the date the Hughes Acquisition was completed. Therefore, our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 are not comparable to our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statements of Operations Data | 2012 | 2011 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Revenue: | |||||||||||||
Equipment revenue—DISH Network | $ | 1,028,588 | $ | 1,158,293 | $ | (129,705 | ) | (11.2 | ) | ||||
Equipment revenue—other | 621,495 | 513,504 | 107,991 | 21.0 | |||||||||
Services and other revenue—DISH Network | 515,176 | 496,636 | 18,540 | 3.7 | |||||||||
Services and other revenue—other | 956,445 | 592,998 | 363,447 | 61.3 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | 3,121,704 | 2,761,431 | 360,273 | 13.0 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Costs and Expenses: | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales—equipment | 1,397,512 | 1,414,791 | (17,279 | ) | (1.2 | ) | |||||||
% of Total equipment revenue | 84.7 | % | 84.6 | % | |||||||||
Cost of sales—services and other | 691,922 | 492,702 | 199,220 | 40.4 | |||||||||
% of Total services and other revenue | 47.0 | % | 45.2 | % | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | |||||||||||||
expenses (including DISH Network) | 372,644 | 303,276 | 69,368 | 22.9 | |||||||||
% of Total revenue | 11.9 | % | 11.0 | % | |||||||||
Research and development expenses | 69,649 | 50,966 | 18,683 | 36.7 | |||||||||
% of Total revenue | 2.2 | % | 1.8 | % | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 457,326 | 385,894 | 71,432 | 18.5 | |||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets | 32,765 | 32,964 | (199 | ) | (0.6 | ) | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | 3,021,818 | 2,680,593 | 341,225 | 12.7 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income | 99,886 | 80,838 | 19,048 | 23.6 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | |||||||||||||
Interest income | 11,176 | 10,821 | 355 | 3.3 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized | (153,029 | ) | (82,593 | ) | (70,436 | ) | 85.3 | ||||||
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net | 177,558 | 13,666 | 163,892 | * | |||||||||
Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net | — | 15,871 | (15,871 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net | (438 | ) | 11,860 | (12,298 | ) | * | |||||||
Other, net | 59,531 | (24,688 | ) | 84,219 | * | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income (expense), net | 94,798 | (55,063 | ) | 149,861 | * | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes | 194,684 | 25,775 | 168,909 | * | |||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net | 16,329 | (21,501 | ) | 37,830 | * | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | 211,013 | 4,274 | 206,739 | * | |||||||||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (35 | ) | 635 | (670 | ) | * | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | $ | 207,409 | * | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Data: | |||||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 793,898 | $ | 482,806 | $ | 311,092 | 64.4 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subscribers, end of period(1) | 636,000 | 602,000 | 34,000 | 5.6 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Equipment revenue—DISH Network. "Equipment revenue—DISH Network" totaled $1.03 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $129.7 million or 11.2% compared to the same period in 2011.
Equipment revenue—DISH Network from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $152.9 million, or 13.2%, to $1.01 billion compared to the same period in 2011. Our EchoStar Technologies segment offers multiple set-top boxes with different price points depending on their capabilities and functionalities. The revenue and associated margins we earn on sales are determined largely through periodic negotiations that could result in prices reflecting, among other things, the set-top boxes and other equipment that meet our customers' current sales and marketing priorities, the product and service alternatives available from other equipment suppliers, our ability to respond to customer requirements, and to differentiate ourselves from other equipment suppliers on bases other than pricing. In addition products containing new technologies and features typically have higher initial prices, which reduce over time as demand decreases or as DISH Network's demand for new or refurbished units changes. The decrease in our equipment revenue from DISH Network was primarily due to a 22.0% decrease in the weighted average price of set-top boxes, offset partially by a 6.0% increase in unit sales of set-top boxes. Additionally, unit sales of related accessories increased 134.7%, offset partially by a 60.7% decrease in weighted average price of related accessories.
Equipment revenue—DISH Network from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $23.2 million to $23.8 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the commencement of broadband equipment sales to DISH Network pursuant to the Distribution Agreement we entered into with dishNET in October 2012.
Equipment revenue—other. "Equipment revenue—other" totaled $621.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $108.0 million or 21.0% compared to the same period in 2011.
Equipment revenue—other from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $13.7 million, or 3.9%, to $365.9 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales of $16.2 million of set-top boxes and related accessories sold to our international customers, which was partially offset by the decrease in sales of $2.6 million of Sling boxes.
Equipment revenue—other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $95.3 million, or 59.2%, to $256.2 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was due to a partial-year revenue earned in 2011 compared to a full-year of revenue earned 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Services and other revenue—other. "Services and other revenue—other" totaled $956.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $363.4 million or 61.3% compared to the same period in 2011.
Services and other revenue—other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $355.1 million, or 69.2%, to $868.5 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was due to partial-year revenue earned in 2011 compared to a full-year of revenue earned 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Services and other revenue—other from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $14.5 million, or 23.3%, to $76.5 million compared to the
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
same period in 2011. The increase was mainly due to higher transponder services of $11.1 million provided in 2012 compared to 2011.
Cost of sales—equipment. "Cost of sales—equipment" totaled $1.40 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $17.3 million or 1.2% compared to the same period in 2011.
Cost of sales—equipment from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $121.4 million, or 9.4%, to $1.17 billion compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was attributable to a decrease in equipment costs of $133.3 million, related directly to a decrease in sales of set-top boxes and related accessories sold to DISH Network. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in cost of sales of $13.0 million, primarily related to an increase in sales of set-top boxes and related accessories to our other international customers.
Cost of sales—equipment from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $104.3 million, or 81.2%, to $232.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was due to partial-year expenses recognized in 2011 compared to a full-year of expenses recognized in 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Cost of sales—services and other. "Cost of sales—services and other" totaled $691.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $199.2 million or 40.4% compared to the same period in 2011.
Cost of sales—services and other from our EchoStar Technologies segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $18.8 million, or 11.1%, to $188.7 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to a $16.6 million increase in support costs related to engineering services provided in 2012 compared to 2011 and a $4.0 million increase in uplink/downlink costs.
Cost of sales—services and other from our Hughes segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $186.3 million, or 79.1%, to $421.9 million compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was due to partial-year expenses recognized in 2011 compared to a full-year of expenses recognized in 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Cost of sales—services and other from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $10.5 million, or 14.7%, to $60.8 million compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in cost of sales of $13.4 million due to the termination of our satellite lease agreement with DISH Network for EchoStar I in July 2012, partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in cost of sales related to the increase in transponder revenue in 2012.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. "Selling, general and administrative expenses" totaled $372.6 million for year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $69.4 million or 22.9% compared to the same period in 2011. The increase primarily related to higher marketing and advertising expenses and other general and administrative expenses of which $132$72.0 million was associated withincurred by our Hughes segment. “Selling,"Selling, general and administrative expenses”expenses" represented 11.0%11.9% and 6.1%11.0% of total revenue for the yearyears ended December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively. The increase in the expense to revenue ratio principally resulted from an increase in revenue and expenses from our Hughes segment, as well as a decreasewhich was acquired in equipment revenue from DISH Network.
55connection with the Hughes Acquisition in June 2011.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation"Depreciation and amortization”amortization" expense totaled $386$457.3 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, an increase of $157$71.4 million or 68.6%18.5% compared to the same period in 2010.2011. The increase was primarily attributablerelated to additionalhigher amortization and depreciation expense of $166$67.0 million incurred from our Hughes segment as we did not complete the Hughes Acquisition until June 2011. In addition, the increase in depreciation expense was attributable to an increase of $25.7 million related to satellites that were accounted for as capital leases, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense of $6.7 million from our EchoStar Satellite Services segment related to EchoStar VI, which was fully depreciated in August 2012. The overall increase in depreciation and amortization expense from our Hughes segment.segment and EchoStar Satellite Services segment was partially offset by lower amortization and depreciation expense of $11.7 million from our EchoStar Technologies segment, primarily relating to the retirement of certain assets.
ImpairmentImpairments of long-lived asset. assets.“Impairment "Impairments of long-lived asset” of $33assets" totaled $32.8 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2012, a decrease of $0.2 million or 0.6% compared to the same period in 2011. Our 2012 impairments relate to a $22.0 impairment of certain contract rights associated with the Hughes Acquisition that were determined to have a lower probability of being realized than was assumed in prior estimates, goodwill impairment of $6.6 million associated with the EchoStar Technologies segment, and an impairment of $4.2 million of certain of our regulatory authorizations. Our 2011 resulted fromimpairment loss of $33.0 million was related to the impairment of our CMBStar satellite. See Note 68 and Note 9 for a discussion of the impairments recorded in 2012 and 2011, respectively, in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.report.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. “Interest"Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized”capitalized" totaled $83$153.0 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2011,2012, an increase of $68$70.4 million or 85.3% compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily related to higher interest expense of: (i) $58.4 million incurred on the Notes and (ii) $10.7 million incurred on our capital lease obligations.
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net. "Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net" totaled $177.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $163.9 million compared to the same period in 2010. This change2011. The increase primarily resulted from an increase in interest expense related to the issuancehigher gains of the Notes during the second quarter$168.2 million recognized on sales of 2011, partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest associated with the constructioncertain of our satellites.strategic investments in public companies in 2012.
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value,Other, net.“Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” "Other, net" totaled $59.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 was a net gain2012, an increase of $16$84.2 million a $129 million decrease compared to the same period in 2010. This decrease2011. The increase was attributableprimarily related to dividends received of $46.0 million from a special dividend declaration from one of our strategic investments accounted for underin 2012, and transaction costs of $35.3 million related to the fair value method. See Note 4 under “InvestmentsHughes Acquisition in TerreStar” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.2011.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $483$793.9 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease2012, an increase of $35$311.1 million or 6.8%64.4% compared to the same period in 2010.2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in gains of $163.9 million recognized on sales of our strategic marketable investment securities, an increase in operating income of $90.5 million, a dividend received of $46.0 million from one of our strategic investments in 2012, and transaction costs of $35.3 million incurred in 2011 relating to the Hughes Acquisition. The increase in EBITDA was partially offset by the gains recognized of $15.9 million from the sale of investments accounted for at
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
fair value in 2011 and the decrease in equity in earnings of $12.3 million from unconsolidated affiliates. The following table reconciles EBITDA to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
| For the Years Ended |
| ||||
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
EBITDA |
| $ | 482,806 |
| $ | 517,772 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
| (71,772 | ) | (88 | ) | ||
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
| (21,501 | ) | (84,415 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (385,894 | ) | (228,911 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 3,639 |
| $ | 204,358 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2012 | 2011 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 793,898 | $ | 482,806 | $ | 311,092 | 64.4 | ||||||
Interest income and expense, net | (141,853 | ) | (71,772 | ) | (70,081 | ) | 97.6 | ||||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net | 16,329 | (21,501 | ) | 37,830 | * | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (457,326 | ) | (385,894 | ) | (71,432 | ) | 18.5 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | $ | 207,409 | * | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax (provision) benefit (provision), net. TheOur income tax provisionbenefit totaled $22approximately $16.3 million duringfor the year ended December 31, 2011, a decrease2012 compared to an income tax provision of $63$21.5 million compared tofor the same period in 2010. This change resulted from a decrease2011. Our effective income tax rate was (8.4%) for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 83.4% for the same period in “Income (loss) before income taxes” offset by an increase in our effective tax rate.2011. Our effective tax rate for the yearyears ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 waswere significantly impacted by the changes in our valuation allowance for deferred taxes that are capital in nature.
Segment Operating Results
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar. Our net income attributable to EchoStar was $4 million during the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2011, a decrease of $201 million compared2012 Compared to the same period in 2010. This change was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
56Year Ended December 31, 2011
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | EchoStar Technologies | Hughes | EchoStar Satellite Services | All Other and Eliminations | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,660,029 | $ | 1,158,714 | $ | 277,985 | $ | 24,976 | $ | 3,121,704 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 69,809 | $ | 292,222 | $ | 118,998 | $ | 31,976 | $ | 513,005 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 110,933 | $ | 265,756 | $ | 212,549 | $ | 204,660 | $ | 793,898 | ||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,780,642 | $ | 676,222 | $ | 278,125 | $ | 26,442 | $ | 2,761,431 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 81,420 | $ | 156,768 | $ | 119,004 | $ | 19,980 | $ | 377,172 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 144,753 | $ | 167,100 | $ | 197,848 | $ | (26,895 | ) | $ | 482,806 | |||||
EchoStar Technologies Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2012 | 2011 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,660,029 | $ | 1,780,642 | $ | (120,613 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 69,809 | $ | 81,420 | $ | (11,611 | ) | (14.3 | ) | ||||
EBITDA | $ | 110,933 | $ | 144,753 | $ | (33,820 | ) | (23.4 | ) | ||||
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
Revenue
Year EndedEchoStar Technologies segment total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 Compared2012 decreased by $120.6 million, or 6.8%, compared to the Year Endedsame period in 2011, as a result of a $139.1 million decrease in total equipment revenue, offset partially by a $18.5 million increase in total service revenue primarily due to a decrease in sales of set-top boxes and related accessories to DISH Network.
Capital Expenditures
EchoStar Technologies segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
| For the Years Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| December 31, |
| Variance |
| |||||||
Statements of Operations Data |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| Amount |
| % |
| |||
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Equipment revenue - DISH Network |
| $ | 1,470,173 |
| $ | 1,174,763 |
| $ | 295,410 |
| 25.1 |
|
Equipment revenue - other |
| 347,765 |
| 302,787 |
| 44,978 |
| 14.9 |
| |||
Services and other revenue - DISH Network |
| 468,399 |
| 373,226 |
| 95,173 |
| 25.5 |
| |||
Services and other revenue - other |
| 64,032 |
| 52,783 |
| 11,249 |
| 21.3 |
| |||
Total revenue |
| 2,350,369 |
| 1,903,559 |
| 446,810 |
| 23.5 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales - equipment |
| 1,553,129 |
| 1,267,172 |
| 285,957 |
| 22.6 |
| |||
% of Total equipment revenue |
| 85.4 | % | 85.8 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales - services and other |
| 236,356 |
| 203,123 |
| 33,233 |
| 16.4 |
| |||
% of Total services and other revenue |
| 44.4 | % | 47.7 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Research and development expenses |
| 46,093 |
| 44,009 |
| 2,084 |
| 4.7 |
| |||
% of Total revenue |
| 2.0 | % | 2.3 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| 143,555 |
| 140,234 |
| 3,321 |
| 2.4 |
| |||
% of Total revenue |
| 6.1 | % | 7.4 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 228,911 |
| 244,129 |
| (15,218 | ) | (6.2 | ) | |||
Total costs and expenses |
| 2,208,044 |
| 1,898,667 |
| 309,377 |
| 16.3 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating income (loss) |
| 142,325 |
| 4,892 |
| 137,433 |
|
| * | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest income |
| 14,472 |
| 26,441 |
| (11,969 | ) | (45.3 | ) | |||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
| (14,560 | ) | (32,315 | ) | 17,755 |
| 54.9 |
| |||
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments |
| 2,923 |
| 119,461 |
| (116,538 | ) | (97.6 | ) | |||
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net |
| 144,473 |
| 313,000 |
| (168,527 | ) | (53.8 | ) | |||
Other, net |
| (860 | ) | (6,120 | ) | 5,260 |
| 85.9 |
| |||
Total other income (expense) |
| 146,448 |
| 420,467 |
| (274,019 | ) | (65.2 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
| 288,773 |
| 425,359 |
| (136,586 | ) | (32.1 | ) | |||
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
| (84,415 | ) | (60,655 | ) | (23,760 | ) | (39.2 | ) | |||
Effective tax rate |
| 29.2 | % | 14.3 | % |
|
|
|
| |||
Net income (loss) |
| 204,358 |
| 364,704 |
| (160,346 | ) | (44.0 | ) | |||
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| * | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 204,358 |
| $ | 364,704 |
| $ | (160,346 | ) | (44.0 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
EBITDA |
| $ | 517,772 |
| $ | 675,362 |
| $ | (157,590 | ) | (23.3 | ) |
* Percentage is2012 decreased by $11.6 million, or 14.3%, compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to the construction of a data center in 2011 that did not meaningful.
occur in 2012.
EchoStar Technologies segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $110.9 million, a decrease of $33.8 million or 23.4% compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily driven by lower equipment revenue earned from the sales of set-top boxes and related accessories, higher research and development costs and impairment of goodwill.
Hughes Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2012 | 2011 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,158,714 | $ | 676,222 | $ | 482,492 | 71.4 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 292,222 | $ | 156,768 | $ | 135,454 | 86.4 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 265,756 | $ | 167,100 | $ | 98,656 | 59.0 | ||||||
Revenue
Hughes segment total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $482.5 million, or 71.4%, compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to partial-year revenue earned in 2011 compared to a full-year of revenue earned in 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Capital Expenditures
Hughes segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $135.5 million, or 86.4%, compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in satellite expenditures related to EchoStar XVII, which was launched in July 2012.
EBITDA
Hughes segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $265.8 million, an increase of $98.7 million or 59.0% compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to partial-year revenue and expenses recognized in 2011 compared to a full-year of revenue and expenses recognized in 2012 as the Hughes Acquisition was not completed until June 2011.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
EchoStar Satellite Services Segment
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | Variance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2012 | 2011 | Amount | % | |||||||||
| | (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 277,985 | $ | 278,125 | $ | (140 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 118,998 | $ | 119,004 | $ | (6 | ) | (0.0 | ) | ||||
EBITDA | $ | 212,549 | $ | 197,848 | $ | 14,701 | 7.4 | ||||||
Revenue
EquipmentEchoStar Satellite Services segment total revenue — DISH Network. “Equipment revenue — DISH Network” totaled $1.470 billion duringfor the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $2952012 increased by $0.1 million, or 25.1%0.1%, compared to the same period in 2009. This change related2011, primarily due to ana $0.1 million increase in unit sales of set-top boxes, partially offset by a decline in average revenue per unit. The decline in average revenue per unit was driven by continued manufacturing efficiencies and a change to one of our component vendor contracts, which reduced our set-top box costs. Pursuant to the receiver agreement in effect during 2010, set-top boxes were soldtransponder services to DISH Network at cost plus a fixed margin resulting in a decline in revenue per unit when lower set-top box costs were incurred.Network.
Capital Expenditures
Equipment revenue - other. “Equipment revenue - other” totaled $348 million duringEchoStar Satellite Services segment capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $45 million or 14.9%2012 remained flat compared to the same period in 2009. This change resulted primarily from an increase in sales to Dish Mexico, which was in addition to the original contribution commitment associated with our investment in Dish Mexico.2011.
EBITDA
EchoStar Satellite Services and other revenue — DISH Network. “Services and other revenue — DISH Network” totaled $468 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $95 million or 25.5% compared to the same period in 2009. The change was driven by an increase in transponder leasing primarily related to the Nimiq 5 satellite, which was placed into service in October 2009, the increase in monthly lease rates per transponder on certain satellites based on the terms of our amended lease agreements and an increase in uplink services. This increase in uplink services was primarily attributable to the launch of additional local channels and additional satellites being placed into service. See Note 17 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
Cost of sales — equipment. “Cost of sales — equipment” totaled $1.553 billion during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $286 million or 22.6% compared to the same period in 2009. This change primarily resulted from an increase in sales of digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network and Dish Mexico. “Cost of sales — equipment” represented 85.4% and 85.8% of total equipment sales during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Cost of sales — services and other. “Cost of sales — services and other” totaled $236 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $33 million or 16.4% compared to the same period in 2009. This change primarily resulted from an increase in costs related to the EchoStar I satellite, which we began leasing from DISH Network during the first quarter 2010, and costs related to the Nimiq 5 satellite, which was placed into service in October 2009. “Cost of sales - services and other” represented 44.4% and 47.7% of total services and other revenue during the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The improvement in this expense to revenue ratio was primarily driven by an increase in transponder leasing revenue, discussed above. The majority of our costs associated with transponder leasing are related to satellites which are included in “Depreciation and amortization” expense.
Depreciation and amortization. “Depreciation and amortization” expense totaled $229 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a $15 million or 6.2% decrease compared to the same period in 2009. The change in “Depreciation and amortization” expense was primarily related to declines in depreciation expense related to satellites that became fully depreciated in 2010, partially offset by depreciation expense associated with Nimiq 5, which was placed into service in October 2009.
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized. “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” totaled $15 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $18 million or 54.9% compared to the same period in 2009. This change primarily resulted from $26 million of interest which was capitalized into construction in progress during 2010, including $7 million that related to interest expense that should have been capitalized in 2009. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest expense related to our capital leases obligations.
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments. “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” totaled a net gain of $3 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a $117 million decrease compared to the same period in 2009. This change primarily resulted from an $87 million decrease in net gains on the sale of marketable investment securities during 2010 compared to 2009 and an increase in impairment charges on our marketable and other investment securities during 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net. “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” totaled a net gain of $144 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a $169 million decrease compared to the same period in 2009. This change is attributable to a decline in gains related to investments accounted for under the fair value method. See Note 4 under “Investments in TerreStar” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA was $518 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $158 million compared to the same period in 2009.segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 20102012 was negatively impacted by$212.5 million, an increase of $14.7 million or 7.4% compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to lower cost of sales of $13.4 million relating to the termination of our satellite lease contract on EchoStar I with DISH Network, which was effective in July 2012.
All Other and Eliminations
EBITDA
All Other and Eliminations EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012 was income of $204.7 million, compared to a decreaseloss of $26.9 million for the same period in “Unrealized and realized2011. The $231.6 million increase in EBITDA was primarily due to increases in gains (losses)of $148.8 million on marketable investment securities and other investments”investments, non-recurring dividends of $46.0 million received from a strategic investment in 2012, and “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net,” partially offset by an increase$35.3 million in “Operating income (loss).” The following table reconciles EBITDAnon-recurring transaction costs related to the accompanying financial statements.Hughes Acquisition in 2011.
|
| For the Years Ended |
| ||||
|
| December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
EBITDA |
| $ | 517,772 |
| $ | 675,362 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
| (88 | ) | (5,874 | ) | ||
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
| (84,415 | ) | (60,655 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (228,911 | ) | (244,129 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 204,358 |
| $ | 364,704 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit, net. The income tax provision totaled $84 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $24 million compared to the same period in 2009. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in the effective tax rate, offset by the decrease in “Income (loss) before income taxes.” The effective tax rate for 2009 was positively impacted by the change in our valuation allowances against certain deferred tax assets that are capital in nature.
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar. Our net income attributable to EchoStar was $204 million during the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $160 million compared to the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the changes in revenue and expenses discussed above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Investment Securities
We consider all liquid investments purchased withinwith an original maturity of 90 days of their maturityor less to be cash equivalents. See “ItemItem 7A.—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk”Risk in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion regarding our marketable investment securities. As of December 31, 2011,2013, our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities totaled $1.696$1.62 billion compared to $1.131$1.55 billion as of December 31, 2010,2012, an increase of $565$73.1 million. This increase in cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities was primarily driven by net proceeds
Table of $1.942 billion related to issuance of the Notes, cash receipts of $697 million related to our investment in TerreStar and cash generated from operations of $447 million, partially offset by the Hughes Acquisition of $2.076 billion, net of cash received, capital expenditures of $377 million and $70 million in net purchases of marketable investment securities.Contents
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
We have investments in various debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds, corporate equity securities, government bonds, and variable rate demand notes (“VRDNs”("VRDNs"). VRDNs are long-termlong term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of investments in many municipalities and corporations, which are backed by financial institutions or other highly rated companies that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows VRDNs to be liquidated generally on athe same day or on a five business day settlement basis. As of December 31, 20112013 and 2010,
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
2012, we held VRDNs, within our current marketable investment securities portfolio, with fair values of $219$34.7 million and $396$66.1 million, respectively.
Our other current marketable investment securities portfolio consists primarily of corporate and government bonds. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we held $918.2 million and $693.5 million, respectively, of corporate and government bonds and other investment securities.
The following discussion highlights our cash flow activities duringfor the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010,2013, 2012 and 2009.2011.
Cash flows from operating activities. We typically reinvest the cash flow from operating activities in our business. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011, we reported net cash inflows from operating activities of $447$450.5 million, $404$505.1 million and $196$447.0 million, respectively.
The $43 million improvement in netNet cash inflowsflows from operating activities duringfor the year ended December 31, 20112013 decreased by $54.6 million compared to the same period in 20102012. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower net income of $37.6 million adjusted to exclude: (i) "Depreciation and amortization;" (ii) "Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net;" (iii) "Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates, net;" (iv) "Impairment of long-lived assets", (v) "Deferred tax benefit;" and (vi) "Other, net."
Net cash generatedflows from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $58.1 million compared to the same period in 2011. The improvement was primarily attributable to the increase in net income of $54$162.6 million adjusted to exclude non-cash changes in: (i) "Depreciation and amortization;" (ii) "Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments;" (iii) "Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates;" (iv) "Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net;" (v) "Deferred tax expense (benefit);" and (vi) "Other, net." The increase in net income adjusted to exclude non-cash was partially offset by a $103.0 million decrease from changes in operating assets and liabilities related to timing differences between bookthe incurrence of expense and cash payments, partially offset by a $4 million decrease in net income adjusted to exclude non-cash changes in: (i) “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net,” (ii) “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments,” (iii)“Depreciation and amortization,” (iv) “Deferred tax expense (benefit)” and (v) the impairment of our CMBStar satellite.
payments.
The $208 million improvement in net cash inflows from operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily attributable to an increase of $183 million in net income adjusted to exclude non-cash changes in: (i) “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net,” (ii) “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” and (iii) “Deferred tax expense (benefit).”
Cash flows from investing activities. Our investing activities generally include purchases and sales of marketable investment securities, capital expenditures, acquistionsacquisitions, and strategic investments. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, we reported net cash outflows from investing activities of $1.888 billion, $239$570.3 million, $346.8 million and $114 million,$1.89 billion, respectively.
The increase in netNet cash outflows from investing activities from 2010for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $223.5 million compared to 2011 of $1.649 billionthe same period in 2012. The increase in cash outflows primarily related to the Hughes Acquisitionan increase of $2.076 billion,$446.0 million in net purchases of cash received, and anmarketable investment securities. This increase was partially offset by a $121.1 million reduction in capital expenditures, decrease of $180$56.7 million partially offset by cash receiptsin acquisitions of $697regulatory authorizations, and proceeds of $40.4 million related to our investment in TerreStar. In addition, 2010 benefited2013 from cash inflowsthe transfer of $103 million related to the assignment of rights under a regulatory authorization and satellite launch serviceservices contract to DISH Network.
The increase in netItem 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Net cash outflows from investing activities from 2009for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $1.54 billion compared to 2010the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the net acquisition cost of $125 million primarily resulted from net purchasesHughes Communications of marketable investment securities of $47 million in 2010 and net sales of marketable investment securities of $223 million in 2009 for a net change of $270 million,$2.08 billion partially offset by cash inflows of $103 million related to the assignment of rights under a launch contract to DISH Network, cash inflows related to a decline in the capital expenditures of $17 million compared to 2009 and proceeds from the sale of a strategic investmentsinvestment of $16 million.$712.9 million in 2011. In addition, the decrease in net cash outflows was attributable to higher net proceeds from our marketable investment securities of $347.8 million in 2012 compared to 2011. The decrease in net cash outflows was partially offset by a $135.8 million increase in capital expenditures in 2012 compared to 2011.
Cash flows from financing activities. Our financing activities generally include net proceeds related to the issuance of long-term debt and cash used for the repurchase, redemption or payment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations, and repurchases of our Class A common stock.obligations. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we reported net cash inflows from financing activities of $1.914 billion. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we reported$18.3 million, net cash outflows from financing activities of $47$44.0 million, and $83 million, respectively.
The increase in net cash inflows from financing activities of $1.91 billion, respectively.
Net cash inflows from 2010financing activities increased to 2011$18.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to net cash outflows of $1.961$44.0 million for the same period in 2012. The increase was primarily due to higher proceeds of $55.8 million received from Class A common stock options exercised and stock issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and an increase in excess tax benefit from stock option exercises, which was partially offset by an increase in repayments of long-term debt of $8.2 million.
Net cash outflows from financing activities decreased by $1.96 billion principally resulted fromfor the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the one-time proceeds received of $1.942$2.00 billion from the issuance of the Notes net of deferred financing costs.in 2011.
Obligations and Future Capital Requirements
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The declinefollowing table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2013 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in net cash outflows from financing activities from 2009future periods:
| | Payments due in the Year Ending December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Total | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 2,001,588 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 150 | $ | 7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,000,000 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 420,800 | 68,360 | 28,005 | 29,074 | 32,414 | 35,949 | 226,998 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 1,143,017 | 180,475 | 175,822 | 172,990 | 169,863 | 166,378 | 277,489 | |||||||||||||||
Satellite-related obligations | 1,106,738 | 466,992 | 236,438 | 68,222 | 52,414 | 45,914 | 236,758 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 71,170 | 22,143 | 18,589 | 12,918 | 8,460 | 2,830 | 6,230 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and other obligations | 212,108 | 207,107 | 1,667 | 1,667 | 1,667 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 4,955,421 | $ | 946,508 | $ | 460,671 | $ | 284,878 | $ | 264,818 | $ | 251,071 | $ | 2,747,475 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
"Satellite-related obligations" primarily includes, among other things, payment pursuant to 2010agreements for the construction of $36 million principally resulted from a decrease in repurchases of Class A common stock during 2010 comparedthe EchoStar XIX and TerreStar-2 satellites, payments pursuant to 2009.launch services contracts, executory costs for our capital lease satellites, costs under transponder agreements and in-orbit incentives relating to certain satellites.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
Obligations and Future Capital Requirements
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2011 future maturities of our contractual obligations are summarized as follows:
|
| Payments due by period |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Total |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2016 |
| Thereafter |
| |||||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
| $ | 2,006,644 |
| $ | 1,171 |
| $ | 1,049 |
| $ | 1,112 |
| $ | 1,139 |
| $ | 1,049 |
| $ | 2,001,124 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
| 527,618 |
| 64,068 |
| 66,502 |
| 70,177 |
| 25,440 |
| 27,731 |
| 273,700 |
| |||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
| 1,496,237 |
| 190,396 |
| 184,137 |
| 177,829 |
| 173,174 |
| 170,435 |
| 600,266 |
| |||||||
Satellite-related obligations |
| 845,107 |
| 325,508 |
| 104,703 |
| 72,759 |
| 50,214 |
| 42,686 |
| 249,237 |
| |||||||
Operating lease obligations |
| 73,695 |
| 21,941 |
| 15,985 |
| 12,539 |
| 8,708 |
| 6,593 |
| 7,929 |
| |||||||
Purchase and other obligations |
| 418,215 |
| 408,257 |
| 2,837 |
| 2,120 |
| 1,667 |
| 1,667 |
| 1,667 |
| |||||||
Payments in connection with acquisition |
| 14,034 |
| 5,437 |
| 5,137 |
| 3,460 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||||
Total |
| $ | 5,381,550 |
| $ | 1,016,778 |
| $ | 380,350 |
| $ | 339,996 |
| $ | 260,342 |
| $ | 250,161 |
| $ | 3,133,923 |
|
“Satellite-related obligations” includes, among other things, our transponder agreements and two launch contracts for satellites that are currently under construction, as described below.
·EchoStar XVI. During November 2009, we entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVI, a DBS satellite, which is expected to be launched during the second half of 2012 and will operate at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. DISH Network has agreed to lease all of the capacity on this satellite from us for a portion of its useful life. As of December 31, 2011, the remaining obligation related to EchoStar XVI of $65 million, including the launch contract, is included in the table above.
·EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. During June 2009, Hughes Communications entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, which is expected to launch in the summer of 2012. Barrett Xplore Inc. has agreed to lease the user beams designed to operate in Canada, which represents a portion of the capacity available on EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. As of December 31, 2011, the remaining obligation related to EchoStar XVII/Jupiter of $108 million, including the launch contract, is included in the table above. During the first quarter 2012, we secured launch insurance and one year in-orbit insurance for a total of $34 million which is not included in the table above.
Our “Purchase"Purchase and other obligations”obligations" primarily consistconsists of binding purchase orders for digital set-top boxes and related components, digital broadcast operations and professional services agreement.components. Our purchase obligations can fluctuate significantly from period to period due to, among other things, management’smanagement's control of inventory levels, and can materially impact our future operating asset and liability balances, and our future working capital requirements. These purchase obligations will be paid from 2011 through 2017.
The table above does not include $30 million ofamounts related to deferred tax liabilities, associated with unrecognized tax benefitspositions and certain other amounts recorded in our noncurrent liabilities as the timing of any payments is uncertain. The table also excludes long-term deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities that were accrued as of December 31, 2011 and are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets included in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We do not expect any portion of this amount to be paid or settled within the next 12 months.
require future cash payments.
In certain circumstances, the dates on which we are obligated to make these paymentspay our contractual obligations could be delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.change.
Acquisition of Brazilian Orbital Slot.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements On August 30, 2011, we were declared the winner of the right to select an orbital slot in an auction conducted by ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory authority. We selected the 45 degree west longitude orbital location for a bid of approximately $77 million using an exchange rate of $1 to 1.8758 Brazilian Real as of December 30, 2011. This amount is not included in the table above. We must comply with certain post-auction regulatory and payment requirements before we will receive the orbital slot. Once we receive the orbital slot, the slot will be used to expand our video and data capabilities in South America.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Aside fromOther than the transactions below, we generally do not engage in off-balance sheet financing activities or use derivative financial instruments for hedge accounting or speculative purposes.
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had $23$39.4 million of contractual obligations to customers and other statutory/governmental agencies, which were secured by letters of credit and insurance bonds. Of this amount, $4$8.1 million was secured by restricted cash; $1$12.4 million related to insurance bonds; and $18$18.9 million was issued under credit arrangements available to our foreign subsidiaries. Certain letters of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries are secured by their assets.
assets of our foreign subsidiaries.
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had $9 million of foreign currency forward contracts with a notional value of $8.4 million in place to partially mitigate foreign currency exchange risk. We evaluate our derivative financial instruments fromFrom time to time, but there can be no assurance that we will notmay enter into additional foreign currency forward contracts, or take other measures, in the future to mitigate ourrisks associated with foreign exchange risk.currency denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions.
Satellite Insurance
We generally do not carry insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we use because we believe that the premium costs are uneconomical relative to the risk of satellite failure. However, pursuant to the terms of the agreements governing certain portions of our indebtedness, we are required, subject to certain limitations on coverage, to obtainmaintain launch and in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter andSPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVI, and to maintain in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, EchoStar XVI and SPACEWAY 3.XVII. The loss of a satellite or other satellite malfunctions or anomalies could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, which we may not be able to mitigate by using available capacity on other satellites. There can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. In addition, the loss of a satellite or other satellite malfunctions or anomalies could affect our ability to comply with FCCFederal Communications Commission and other regulatory obligations and our ability to fund the construction or acquisition of replacement satellites for our in-orbit fleet in a timely fashion, or at all.
Future Capital Requirements
We primarily rely on our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances, as well as cash flow generated through our operations to fund our investment needs. Since we currently depend on DISH Network for a substantial portion of our revenue, our cash flow from operations depends heavily on itsDISH Network's needs for equipment and services. During the year ended December 31, 2011, DISH Network purchased fewer digital set-top boxes and related components from us. In addition, toTo the extent that DISH Network’sNetwork's gross subscriber additions decrease or DISH Network experiences a net loss of subscribers, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
could have a further material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. In addition, we currently have two satellites under construction,As of December 31, 2013, our remaining obligations related to EchoStar XVI, EchoStar XVII, EchoStar XIX, TerreStar-2 and EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. The expected future payments related to these satellites are $173launch contracts with Arianespace, SA and International Launch Services, Inc. totaled $553.6 million. As a result, thereThere can be no assurance that we will have positive cash flows from operations. Furthermore, if we experience negative cash flows, our existing cash and marketable investment securities balances may be reduced.
We have a significant amount of outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2011,2013, our total indebtedness was $2.534 billion.$2.42 billion, of which $420.8 million related to capital lease obligations. Our liquidity requirements will be significant, primarily due to our debt service requirements. In addition, our future capital expenditures are likely to increase if we make additional investments in infrastructure necessary to support and expand our business, or if we decide to purchase one or more additional satellites. Other aspects of our business operations may also require additional capital. We periodically evaluate various strategic initiatives, the pursuit of which could also could require us to raise significant additional capital.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
Satellites
As our satellite fleet ages, we will be required to evaluate replacement alternatives such as acquiring, leasing, or constructing additional satellites, with or without customer commitments for capacity. We may also may construct or lease additional satellites in the future to provide satellite services at additional orbital locations or to improve the quality of our satellite services.
Stock Repurchases
Pursuant to a stock repurchase plan approved by our Board of Directors, we are authorized to repurchase up to $500$500.0 million of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock through and including December 31, 2011. During2014. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we did not repurchase any common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased 34,000 shares of our Class A common stock for $605,000. On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors extended the plan, such that we are authorized to make such repurchases through and including December 31, 2012.under this plan.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires managementus to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheets, the reported therein. Management bases itsamounts of revenue and expenses for each reporting period, and certain information disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report. We base our estimates, judgments, and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that are believedwe believe to be reasonablerelevant under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimatesour consolidated financial statements. We review our estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.occur or prospectively if the revised estimate affects future periods. The following represent what we believe are the critical accounting policies that may involve a high degree of estimation, judgment and complexity. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, including those discussed below, see Note 2 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
report.
·Accounting forMarketable Securities and Other Investments
We hold investments in private and publicly-traded securities. We hold debt and equity interestssecurities of various companies, including marketable investments in companies, some of which are publicly traded securities and have highly volatile prices. We record an investment impairment chargenon-marketable investments in “Unrealized and realized gains (losses) onsecurities of privately held
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
companies. Our marketable investment securities ordinarily are accounted for as available-for-sale; accordingly, we report those securities at fair value on a recurring basis and generally recognize unrealized gains and losses in other investments” within “Other Income (Expense)”comprehensive income (loss). Except in unusual circumstances, the estimated fair values of our marketable investment securities are determined by reference to quoted prices for identical securities or based primarily on our Consolidated Statements of Operationsother observable market inputs. Our investments in non-marketable securities typically are strategic investments in privately held companies and Comprehensive Income (Loss)may be highly speculative. We account for such investments using the equity method when we believeexert significant influence over the investee; otherwise, we account for such investments using the cost method.
All of our investments are subject to quarterly evaluations to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, in which case we record an impairment loss in determining net income. For our marketable investment securities, our impairment evaluation considers factors such the length of time the security has been in a continuous unrealized loss position, the magnitude of the unrealized loss, current market conditions, company-specific information, and whether we have the intent and ability to hold the investment in the foreseeable future. Generally, it is not practicable to estimate fair value of our cost method and equity method investments on a recurring basis. Our impairment evaluation for such investments considers whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. As part of our evaluation, we review available information such as recent company financial statements, business plans and current economic conditions for factors that may indicate an impairment of our investments. When we determine that an investment has experiencedis impaired and the impairment is other-than-temporary, we adjust the carrying amount of the investments to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment loss in earnings. In these circumstances, our fair value estimates may reflect significant unobservable inputs.
Our periodic investment impairment evaluations require us to make significant estimates, judgments and assumptions about uncertain future events. In some cases, there may be limited or no observable market data to support significant assumptions in our estimates. As a declineresult of weakening economic conditions, or other future events and changes in value that is judged to be other-than-temporary. We monitorcircumstances affecting our investments, forwe may subsequently determine that an investment is impaired or that an existing impairment by considering current factors including economic environment, market conditionsis other-than-temporary. Such events and the operational performance and other specific factors relating to the business underlying the investment. Future adverse changes in these factorscircumstances could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying valueour recognition of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring anmaterial investment impairment chargelosses in the future.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
·Fair value of financial instruments. Fair value estimates of our financial instruments are made at a point in time, based on relevant market data as well asand the best information available aboutspecific characteristics of the financial instrument. Weak economic conditions have in prior periods resulted in inactive markets for certain of our financial instruments, including “Marketable and other investment securities” oncertain debt securities that historically have been included in "Other investments" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For certain of these instruments, there ismay be limited or no or limited observable market data. Fair value estimates for financial instruments for which nolimited or limitedno observable market data is available are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, liquidity discounts, currency, credit and interest rate risks, loss experience, bankruptcy and other factors. These estimates involve significant uncertainties and judgments and may be agenerally are less precise measurementthan measurements of fair value as compared to financial instruments wherebased on observable market data is available.data. We make certain assumptions related to expected maturity date, credit and interest rate risk based upon market conditions and prior experience. As a result, such calculated fair value estimates may not be realizable in a current sale or immediate settlement of the instrument. In addition, changes in the underlying assumptions used in the fair value measurement technique, including liquidity risks and estimateestimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect these fair value
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
estimates, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
We evaluate our long-lived assets other than goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives, for impairment whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group is considered to not be recoverable when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from such asset or asset group is less than its carrying amount. In that event, an impairment loss is recorded in the determination of operating income based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the long-lived asset or asset group. Fair value is determined primarily using discounted cash flow techniques reflecting the estimated cash flows and discount rate that would be assumed by a market participant for the asset or asset group under review. Our discounted cash flow estimates typically include assumptions based on unobservable inputs and may reflect probability-weighting of alternative scenarios. Estimated losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale may be determined in a similar manner, except that fair value estimates are reduced for estimated selling costs. Changes in estimates of future cash flows, discounts rates and other assumptions could result in recognition of additional impairment losses in future periods.
63Impairment Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
We test our goodwill for impairment annually and more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. There are two steps to the goodwill impairment test. Step one compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, it is necessary to perform the second step of the impairment test, which compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of such goodwill to determine the amount of impairment loss. We may bypass the two-step quantitative impairment test when we determine based on a qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount including goodwill.
As of December 31, 2013, our goodwill consisted entirely of goodwill assigned to reporting units of our Hughes segment in connection with the 2011 acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Hughes Acquisition"). We test the goodwill related to the Hughes segment annually in our second fiscal quarter. In the second quarter of 2013, we determined based on a qualitative assessment that it was more likely than not that the fair values of our Hughes reporting units exceeded their carrying amounts including goodwill. Our qualitative assessment considered the results of our quantitative annual impairment test in 2012 and generally favorable trends in the operations of the reporting units and in other significant inputs that would be used to determine fair value. Depending on our assessment of future events and changes in circumstances, we may be required to perform the two-step quantitative impairment test in the future. We may determine that some or all of our goodwill is impaired in connection with future impairment tests.
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of regulatory authorizations for the use of spectrum in specified orbital locations. We test these intangible assets annually in our fourth fiscal quarter, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. We recognize an impairment loss in the determination of operating income when we determine that the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — OPERATIONS—Continued
·Acquisition of investments in non-marketable investment securities. We calculate the fair value of our interest in non-marketable investment securities either as consideration given, or for non-cash acquisitions, based on the results of valuation analyses utilizing adetermined primarily using discounted cash flow or DCF model. The DCF methodology involvestechniques reflecting the use of various estimates relating to futureestimated cash flows and discount rate that we believe would be assumed by market participants. Our cash flow projections typically include significant assumptions based on unobservable inputs. Changes in economic conditions, laws and discount rates for which significant judgments are required.regulations, technology, competition and other factors could affect the assumptions reflected in our fair value estimates and may result in future intangible asset impairments.
Business Combinations
·Business combinations.When we acquire a business, we allocateassign the purchase price to the various components of the acquisitionacquired assets and liabilities based upon thetheir fair value of each component using various valuation techniques, including the market approach, income approach, and/or cost approach. The accounting standard for business combinations requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests and goodwill acquired to be recorded at fair value. Transaction costs related to the acquisition of the business are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with the issuance of debt associated with a business combination are capitalized and included as a yield adjustment to the underlying debt’sdebt's stated rate. Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their estimated useful lives unless the lives are determined to be indefinite. Amortization of these intangible assets is recorded on a straight line basis over an average finite useful life primarily ranging from approximately one to twenty years or in relation to the estimated discounted cash flows over the life of the intangible.
Revenue Recognition
·Valuation of long-lived assets. We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, other than goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, when events and circumstances warrant such a review. See Note 2 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The carrying value of a long-lived asset or asset group is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows from such asset or asset group is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss will be recorded in “Impairments of long-lived asset” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset or asset group. Fair value is determined primarily using the estimated cash flows associated with the asset or asset group under review, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for estimated selling costs. Among other reasons, changes in estimates of future cash flows could result in a write-down of the asset in a future period.
·Valuation of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives annually, and also when events and circumstances warrant. We use estimates of fair value to determine the amount of impairment, if any, of recorded goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives. Fair value is determined primarily using the estimated future cash flows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. While our impairment tests in 2011 indicated the fair value of our intangible assets were above their carrying amounts, significant changes in our estimates of future cash flows could result in a write-down of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives in a future period, which will be recorded in a new line item entitled “Impairments of goodwill, indefinite-lived and long-lived assets” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and could be material to our consolidated results of operations and financial position. Our newly acquired Hughes segment will complete its goodwill impairment testing annually in the quarter ended June 30. A 10% decrease in the estimated future cash flows or a 10% increase in the discount rate used in estimating the fair value of these assets (while all other assumptions remain unchanged) would not result in these assets being impaired.
·Revenue Recognition.Our Hughes segment enters into contracts to design, develop, and deliver telecommunication networks to customers in our enterprise market.and mobile satellite systems markets. These contracts for telecommunication networks require significant effort to develop and construct the network, over an extended time period. Revenues are also earned from long-term contracts for the sale of mobile satellite communications systems. SalesRevenue under these long-term contracts areis recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Depending on the nature of the deliverables in each arrangement, we recognize revenue under the cost-to-cost method or the units of delivery method. Under the cost-to-cost method, sales are recorded equivalent to costs incurred plus a portion of the profit expected to be realized, based on the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Under the units of delivery method, sales are recorded as products are delivered and costs are recognized based on the expected profit for the entire agreement. Profits expected to be realized on long-term contracts are based on estimates of total sale valuesrevenue and costs at completion. These estimates are reviewed and revised periodically throughout the lives of the contracts, and adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are recorded in the accounting period in which the revisions are made. Estimated losses on contracts are recorded in the period in which they are identified. Changes in our estimates related to revenue recognition for these contracts could result in significant changes in our revenuesrevenue or costs, which could be material to our consolidated results of operations.
Income Taxes
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
·Income taxes. Our income tax policy is toWe record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about the timing of future events, including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities. We periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance based on both historical evidence, including trends, and future expectations in each reporting period. Any such valuation allowance is recorded in either “Income"Income tax (provision) benefit net” on(provision), net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) or “Accumulated"Accumulated other
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
comprehensive income (loss)" within “Stockholders’ equity (deficit)” on"Stockholders' equity" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Future performance could have a significant effect on the realization of tax benefits, or reversals of valuation allowances, as reported in our consolidated results of operations.
·Uncertainty in tax positions. Management evaluates the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions based on applicable tax law, regulations, case law, administrative rulings and pronouncements, and the facts and circumstances surrounding the tax position. Changes in our estimates related to the recognition and measurement of the amount recorded for uncertain tax positions could result in significant changes in our “Income"Income tax benefit (provision) benefit,”, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) which could be material to our consolidated results of operations.
Contingent Liabilities
·Contingent liabilities. A significant amount of management judgment is required in determining when, or if,whether an accrual should be recorded for a loss contingency and the amount of such accrual. Estimates generally are developed in consultation with counsel and are based on an analysis of potential outcomes. Due to the uncertainty of determining the likelihood of a future event occurring and the potential financial statement impact of such an event, it is possible that upon further development or resolution of a contingent matter, a charge could be recorded in a future period to “Selling, general and administrative expenses” onin our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) which could be material to our consolidated results of operations and financial position. We record an accrual for litigation and other loss contingencies when we determine that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal fees and other costs of defending litigation are charged to expense as incurred.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011,For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 in the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 amending ASC 350 “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other” relatedNotes to goodwill impairment testing. Among other things, ASU 2011-08 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair valueConsolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. Although early adoption is allowed, the amendment is effective for impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.this report. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-08 toanticipate that any recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a material impactsignificant effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.statements.
Seasonality
For our EchoStar Technologies and EchoStar Satellite Services segments,segment, we are affected by seasonality to the extent it impacts our customers. Our customers inas a result of their sales and promotion activities, which can vary from year to year. Although the pay-TV industry, including DISH Network, our largest customer, typically experience seasonality. Historically,seasonal impacts have not been significant, historically, the first half of the year generally produces fewer new subscribers for the pay-TV industry than the second half of the year. However, we can notcannot provide assurance that this trend will continue in the future.
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Continued
For our Hughes segment, service revenue is generally not impacted by seasonal fluctuations other than those related to fluctuations related to sales and promotional activities. However, like many communications infrastructure equipment vendors, a higher amount of our hardware revenuesrevenue occur in the second half of the year due to our customers’customers' annual procurement and budget cycles. Large enterprises and operators often allocate their capital expenditure budgets at the beginning of their fiscal year (which often coincides with the calendar year). The typical sales cycle for large complex system procurements is 6six to 12 months, which often results in the customer expenditure occurring towards the end of the year. Customers often seek to expend the budgeted funds prior to the end of the year and the next budget cycle. In the Hughes consumer business, we see a similar seasonality for consumer acquisitions, and therefore hardware revenue, as is seen in the consumer and retail sectors where the first and fourth calendar quarters tend to be higher than the second and third quarters.
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—Continued
Our EchoStar Satellite Services segment is not generally affected by seasonal impacts.
Inflation
Inflation has not materially affected our operations during the past three years. We believe that our ability to increase the prices charged for our products and services in future periods will depend primarily on competitive pressures or contractual terms.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risks Associated Withwith Financial Instruments and Foreign Currency
Our investments and debt are exposed to market risks, discussed below.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Current Marketable Investment SecuritiesSecurities
As of December 31, 2011,2013, our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investment securities had a fair value of $1.696$1.62 billion. Of thatthis amount, a total of $1.480$1.59 billion was invested in: (a) cash; (b) VRDNs convertible into cash at par value plus accrued interest generally in five business days or less; (c) debt instruments of the U.S. Government and its agencies; (d) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; (c) VRDNs convertible into cash at par value plus accrued interest generally in five business days or less; (d) debt instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies; and/or (e) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality characteristics to the commercial paper and corporate obligations described above. The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to, among other things, fund operations, make strategic investments and expand the business. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is received and used in our business. The value of this portfolio ismay be negatively impacted by credit losses; however, this risk is mitigated through diversification that limits our exposure to any one issuer.
Interest Rate Risk
A change in interest rates would not affect the fair value of our cash, or materially affect the fair value of our cash equivalents due to their maturities of less than 90 days. A change in interest rates would affect the fair value of our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investmentdebt securities portfolio; however, we normally hold these investments to maturity. Based on our current non-strategic investment portfolio of $1.480$1.59 billion as of December 31, 2011,2013, a hypothetical 10% change in average interest rates during 20112013 would not have a material impact on theirthe fair value of our cash, cash equivalents and debt securities portfolio due to the limited duration of our investments.
Our cash, cash equivalents and current marketable investmentdebt securities had an average annual rate of return for the year ended December 31, 20112013 of 0.7%1.1%. A change in interest rates would affect our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since funds would be re-invested at different rates as the instruments mature. A hypothetical 10% decrease in average interest rates during 20112013 would resulthave resulted in a decrease of approximately $1$1.4 million in annual interest income.
Strategic Marketable Investment Securities
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we held current strategic and financial debt and equity investments in the publicly traded common stock of several public companies with a fair value of $216$33.6 million. These investments, which are held for strategic and financial purposes, are concentrated in a small number of companies, are highly
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK—Continued
speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility. The fair value of our strategic and financial debt and equitythese investments can be significantly impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of the companies whose securities we have invested in, risks associated with specific industries, and other factors. These investments are subject to significant fluctuations in fair value due to the volatility of the securities markets and of the underlying businesses. In general, the debt instruments held in our strategic marketable investment
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK — Continued
securities portfolio are not significantly impacted by interest rate fluctuations as their value is more closely related to factors specific to the underlying business. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the market price of our public strategic debt and equity investments would result in a decrease of approximately $22$3.4 million in the fair value of these investments.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities and Noncurrent Marketable and Other Investment SecuritiesInvestments
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had $24$16.1 million of restricted cash and marketable investment securities invested in: (a) cash; (b) VRDNs convertible into cash at par value plus accrued interest generally in five business days or less; (c) debt instruments of the U.S. Governmentgovernment and its agencies; (d) commercial paper and corporate notes with an overall average maturity of less than one year and rated in one of the four highest rating categories by at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations; and/orand (e) instruments with similar risk, duration and credit quality characteristics to the commercial paper described above. Based on our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2011,2013, a hypothetical 10% increase in average interest rates would not have a material impact inon the fair value of our restricted cash and marketable investment securities.
Other Investments
Other Investment Securities
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had $140$169.8 million of noncurrent public and nonpublic debt and equity instruments that we hold for strategic business purposes and account for under the cost or equity and/ormethods of accounting. The fair value methods of accounting.these instruments is not readily determinable. We periodically review these investments and estimate fair value when there are indications of impairment. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the value of these debt and equity instruments would result in a decrease of approximately $14$17.0 million in the fair value of these investments.
Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded depends on the success of those companies’companies' businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We generally conduct our business in U.S. dollars. Our international business is conducted in a variety of foreign currencies including U.S. dollars, and it is therefore exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our objective in managing our exposure to foreign currency changes is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Accordingly, we may enter into foreign exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions. As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had an estimated $28$27.3 million of foreign currency denominated receivables and payables outstanding, and $9 million of foreign currency forward contracts with a notional value of $8.4 million in place to partially mitigate foreign
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK—Continued
currency exchange risk. The differences between the face amountsestimated fair values of the foreign exchange contracts and their estimated fair values were not material as of December 31, 2011.2013. The impact of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange rates on the fair valuecarrying amount of foreign currency denominatedthe net assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries would be an estimated loss of $14$24.6 million as of December 31, 2011.
Long-Term Debt
As of December 31, 2011, we had long-term debt of $2.007 billion, excluding capital lease obligations, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We estimated the fair value of this debt to be approximately $2.081 billion using quoted market prices for our publicly traded debt, which constitutes approximately 99% of our debt. Our debt has fixed interest rates, however the fair value of our debt is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% decrease in assumed interest rates would increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $86 million. To the extent interest rates increase, our costs of financing would increase if and when we refinance our debt. As of December 31, 2011, a hypothetical 10% increase in assumed interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $14 million.
2013.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK — Continued
Derivative Financial Instruments
In general weWe generally do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes and we generally do not apply hedge accounting or speculative purposes, however, as of December 31, 2011, we had $9 million of foreign currency forward contracts in placetreatment to partially mitigate foreign exchange risk.our derivative financial instruments. We evaluate our derivative financial instruments from time to time but there can be no assurance that we will not enter into additional foreign currency forward contracts, or take other measures, in the future to mitigate our foreign exchange risk.
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Item 15 of this report beginning on page F-4.
Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting
On June 8, 2011, we completed the Hughes Acquisition. We are currently integrating policies, processes, people, technology and operations for the combined company. Management will continue to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting as we execute integration activities. Except as discussed above, thereThere has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter of 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We continue to review our internal control over financial reporting, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing its effectiveness and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
Management’sManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES—Continued
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and our directors; and
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011. Our evaluation of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal control of Hughes Communications which we acquired on June 8, 2011. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 included $2.709 billion of assets and $676 million of revenue associated with this business.
2013.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20112013 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in Item 15(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction.
On February 20, 2014, EchoStar entered into agreements with DISH Network to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, EchoStar will issue two series of preferred tracking stocks in exchange for the transfer by DISH Network of five satellites (including related in-orbit incentive obligations and interest payments of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we will lease to DISH certain satellite capacity on these five satellites (collectively, the "Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction").
Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
Transaction Agreement. On February 20, 2014, EchoStar Corporation, Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation ("HSS"), and certain of our other subsidiaries entered into a Transaction Agreement (the "Transaction Agreement") with DISH Operating L.L.C. ("DOLLC") and DISH Network L.L.C. ("DNLLC" and, together with DOLLC, the "DISH Investors"), each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation ("DISH Network"), and EchoStar XI Holding L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DNLLC, pursuant to which on March 1, 2014, EchoStar Corporation and HSS will among other things, issue an aggregate of 6,290,499 shares (the "EchoStar Tracking Stock") and 81.128 shares (the "HSS Tracking Stock", and together with the EchoStar Tracking Stock, the "Tracking Stock"), respectively, of preferred tracking stock to the DISH Investors in exchange for the transfer by the DISH Investors and their respective subsidiaries, as applicable, to EchoStar Corporation and HSS, as applicable, five satellites (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION—Continued
EchoStar XIV) (including related in-orbit incentive obligations of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash (the "Transaction"). The Tracking Stock will generally track the residential retail satellite broadband business of Hughes Network Systems, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSS ("Hughes"), including without limitation the operations, assets and liabilities attributed to the Hughes residential retail satellite broadband business (collectively, the "Hughes Retail Group"). The shares of the Tracking Stock to be issued to the DISH Investors will represent an aggregate 80.0% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group. In addition to the remaining 20.0% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, EchoStar will retain all economic interest in the wholesale satellite broadband business. The Transaction Agreement includes, among other things, customary mutual provisions for representations, warranties and indemnification.
Satellite Capacity Leased to DISH. On February 20, 2014, we and certain subsidiaries of DISH Network entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which beginning March 1, 2014, DISH Network will, among other things, lease certain satellite capacity on the EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI, and EchoStar XIV satellites. The total fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the number of transponders on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each satellite capacity agreement generally terminates upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; or (iii) a certain date based upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite. DISH Network generally has the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite's life. There can be no assurance that any options to renew such agreements will be exercised.
Investor Rights Agreement. On February 20, 2014, EchoStar and HSS entered into an Investor Rights Agreement (the "Investor Rights Agreement") with the DISH Investors with respect to the Tracking Stock. The Investor Rights Agreement provides for, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for the DISH Investors; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfer of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to us in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require us to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions; certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock. The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate as to the DISH Investors at such time as the DISH Investors no longer hold any shares of the HSS-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the Investor Rights Agreement.
Item 3.02. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.OTHER INFORMATION
The disclosures under Item 1.01 of this Item 9B are incorporated into this Item 3.02 by reference. The Tracking Stock will be issued and sold pursuant to the Transaction Agreement in a transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
The above disclosures are included under this "Item 9B Other Information" in lieu of Items 1.01 and 3.02 disclosure under a timely Form 8-K.
None.
Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item with respect to the identity and business experience of our directors and corporate governance will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Election"Election of Directors,”" which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The information required by this Item with respect to the identity and business experience of our executive officers is set forth on page 1618 of this report under the caption “Executive"Executive Officers of the Registrant.”"
Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Executive"Executive Compensation and Other Information,”" which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the captions “Election"Election of Directors,” “Equity" "Equity Security Ownership”Ownership" and “Equity"Equity Compensation Plan Information,”" which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Certain"Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,”" which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement for the 20122014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Principal Accounting"Principal Accountant Fees and Services,”" which information is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, (2) Financial Statement Schedules Schedule Condensed Balance (3) Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Form of Intellectual Property Matters Agreement between EchoStar Corporation, EchoStar Acquisition L.L.C., Echosphere L.L.C., DISH DBS Corporation, EIC Spain SL, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated October 21, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176).*** QuetzSat-1 Transponder Service Agreement, dated November 24, 2008, between EchoStar 77 Corporation, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar Corporation, and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807). EchoStar XVI Satellite Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Executive Vice President, Date: February 21, 2014 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ MICHAEL T. DUGAN Chief Executive Officer, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Financial Statements: Index to Consolidated Financial Statements Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Stockholders We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, EchoStar Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, /s/ KPMG LLP As of December 31, 2011 2010 Assets Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 614,035 $ 141,814 Marketable investment securities 1,082,407 989,086 Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $18,484 and $7,644, respectively 212,960 42,247 Trade accounts receivable - DISH Network, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero 229,852 238,997 Inventory 68,707 30,433 Deferred tax assets 23,492 — Other current assets 76,284 92,890 Total current assets 2,307,737 1,535,467 Noncurrent Assets: Restricted cash and marketable investment securities 24,286 17,426 Property and equipment, net 2,453,546 1,263,303 FCC authorizations 469,810 69,810 Intangible assets, net 466,452 158,994 Goodwill 533,018 6,457 Marketable and other investment securities 140,439 725,588 Other noncurrent assets, net 148,449 64,975 Total noncurrent assets 4,236,000 2,306,553 Total assets $ 6,543,737 $ 3,842,020 Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) Current Liabilities: Trade accounts payable $ 250,366 $ 145,203 Trade accounts payable - DISH Network 16,374 14,155 Deferred revenue and other 54,090 4,683 Accrued royalties 23,590 20,199 Accrued expenses and other 174,063 57,396 Deferred tax liabilities — 64,121 Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 65,239 53,060 Total current liabilities 583,722 358,817 Long-Term Obligations, Net of Current Portion: Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion 2,469,023 359,825 Deferred tax liabilities 373,391 75,840 Long-term deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities 65,975 34,348 Total long-term obligations, net of current portion 2,908,389 470,013 Total liabilities 3,492,111 828,830 Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding — — Class A common stock, $.001 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 44,500,440 and 43,103,166 shares issued, and 38,968,122 and 37,570,848 shares outstanding, respectively 45 43 Class B common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 47,687,039 shares issued and outstanding 48 48 Class C common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding — — Class D common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding — — Additional paid-in capital 3,360,301 3,311,405 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 165,771 188,982 Accumulated earnings (deficit) (385,487 ) (389,126 ) Treasury stock, at cost (98,162 ) (98,162 ) Total EchoStar stockholders’ equity (deficit) 3,042,516 3,013,190 Noncontrolling interests 9,110 — Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) 3,051,626 3,013,190 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ 6,543,737 $ 3,842,020 Assets Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Marketable investment securities Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13,237 and $16,894, respectively Trade accounts receivable—DISH Network, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of zero Inventory Prepaid expenses Deferred tax assets Other current assets Total current assets Noncurrent Assets: Restricted cash and marketable investment securities Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,499,889 and $2,261,699, respectively Regulatory authorizations, net Goodwill Other intangible assets, net Other investments Other receivable—DISH Network Other noncurrent assets, net Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Current Liabilities: Trade accounts payable Trade accounts payable—DISH Network Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations Deferred revenue and other Accrued compensation Accrued royalties Accrued expenses and other Total current liabilities Noncurrent Liabilities: Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion Deferred tax liabilities Long-term deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and Contingencies (Note 16) Stockholders' Equity: Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding Class A common stock, $.001 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 48,370,956 and 45,449,362 shares issued, and 42,838,638 and 39,917,044 shares outstanding, respectively Class B common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 47,687,039 shares issued and outstanding Class C common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding Class D common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding Additional paid-in capital Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") Accumulated deficit Treasury stock, at cost Total EchoStar stockholders' equity Noncontrolling interests Total stockholders' equity Total liabilities and stockholders' equity The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 Revenue: Equipment revenue - DISH Network $ 1,158,293 $ 1,470,173 $ 1,174,763 Equipment revenue - other 513,504 347,765 302,787 Services and other revenue - DISH Network 496,636 468,399 373,226 Services and other revenue - other 592,998 64,032 52,783 Total revenue 2,761,431 2,350,369 1,903,559 Costs and Expenses: (exclusive of depreciation shown below - Note 6) Cost of sales - equipment 1,414,791 1,553,129 1,267,172 Cost of sales - services and other 492,702 236,356 203,123 Research and development expenses 50,966 46,093 44,009 Selling, general and administrative expenses 288,575 128,366 116,737 General and administrative expenses - DISH Network 14,701 15,189 23,497 Depreciation and amortization (Note 6 and 7) 385,894 228,911 244,129 Impairment of long-lived asset (Note 6) 32,964 — — Total costs and expenses 2,680,593 2,208,044 1,898,667 Operating income (loss) 80,838 142,325 4,892 Other Income (Expense): Interest income 10,821 14,472 26,441 Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (82,593 ) (14,560 ) (32,315 ) Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments 13,666 2,923 119,461 Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net 15,871 144,473 313,000 Other, net (12,828 ) (860 ) (6,120 ) Total other income (expense) (55,063 ) 146,448 420,467 Income (loss) before income taxes 25,775 288,773 425,359 Income tax (provision) benefit, net (21,501 ) (84,415 ) (60,655 ) Net income (loss) 4,274 204,358 364,704 Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 635 — — Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar $ 3,639 $ 204,358 $ 364,704 Comprehensive Income (Loss): Net income (loss) $ 4,274 $ 204,358 $ 364,704 Foreign currency translation adjustments (15,298 ) 927 569 Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax (1,276 ) 141,161 212,070 Recognition of previously unrealized (gains) losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income (loss), net of tax (6,637 ) (30,226 ) (124,921 ) Comprehensive income (loss) (18,937 ) 316,220 452,422 Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (568 ) — — Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to EchoStar $ (18,369 ) $ 316,220 $ 452,422 Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Class A and B common stock: Basic 86,223 85,084 85,765 Diluted 87,089 85,203 86,059 Earnings per share - Class A and B common stock: Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar $ 0.04 $ 2.40 $ 4.25 Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar $ 0.04 $ 2.40 $ 4.24 Revenue: Equipment revenue—DISH Network Equipment revenue—other Services and other revenue—DISH Network Services and other revenue—other Total revenue Costs and Expenses: Cost of sales—equipment (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) Cost of sales—services and other (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) Selling, general and administrative expenses General and administrative expenses—DISH Network Research and development expenses Depreciation and amortization Impairment of long-lived assets Total costs and expenses Operating income Other Income (Expense): Interest income Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments (includes reclassification of realized gains on available-for-sale ("AFS") securities out of AOCI of $36,312, $175,223, and $6,637, respectively), net Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net Other, net Total other income (expense), net Income (loss) before income taxes Income tax benefit (provision), net Net income Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Net income attributable to EchoStar Weighted-average common shares outstanding—Class A and B common stock: Basic Diluted Earnings per share—Class A and B common stock: Basic Diluted Comprehensive Income (Loss) Net income Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: Foreign currency translation adjustments Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities and other Recognition of previously unrealized gains on AFS securities in net income Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax Comprehensive income (loss) Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to EchoStar The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Class Accumulated A and B Additional Other Accumulated Common Paid-In Comprehensive Earnings/ Treasury Noncontrolling Stock Capital Income (Loss) (Deficit) Stock Interest Total Balance, December 31, 2008 $ 90 $ 3,248,327 $ (10,598 ) $ (958,188 ) $ (68,045 ) $ — $ 2,211,586 Capital transaction with DISH Network in connection with the launch service (Note 17) — 14,460 — — — — 14,460 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options 1 217 — — — — 218 Employee benefits — 1,391 — — — — 1,391 Employee Stock Purchase Plan — 1,803 — — — — 1,803 Class A common stock repurchases, at cost — — — — (29,512 ) — (29,512 ) Non-cash, stock-based compensation — 13,371 — — — — 13,371 Income tax (expense) benefit related to stock awards and other — (889 ) — — — — (889 ) Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net — — 87,149 — — — 87,149 Foreign currency translation — — 569 — — — 569 Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar — — — 364,704 — — 364,704 Balance, December 31, 2009 91 3,278,680 77,120 (593,484 ) (97,557 ) — 2,664,850 Capital transactions with DISH Network, net of tax (Note 17) — 11,309 — — — — 11,309 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options — 1,577 — — — — 1,577 Employee benefits — 3,856 — — — — 3,856 Employee Stock Purchase Plan — 2,437 — — — — 2,437 Class A common stock repurchases, at cost — — — — (605 ) — (605 ) Non-cash, stock-based compensation — 13,546 — — — — 13,546 Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net — — 110,935 — — — 110,935 Foreign currency translation — — 927 — — — 927 Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar — — — 204,358 — — 204,358 Balance, December 31, 2010 91 3,311,405 188,982 (389,126 ) (98,162 ) — 3,013,190 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options 2 25,609 — — — — 25,611 Employee benefits — 4,046 — — — — 4,046 Employee Stock Purchase Plan — 3,177 — — — — 3,177 Non-cash, stock-based compensation — 16,064 — — — — 16,064 Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net — — (7,913 ) — — — (7,913 ) Foreign currency translation — — (15,298 ) — — (1,203 ) (16,501 ) Acquisition of Hughes Communications — — — — — 9,678 9,678 Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests — — — — 635 635 Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar — — — 3,639 — — 3,639 Balance, December 31, 2011 $ 93 $ 3,360,301 $ 165,771 $ (385,487 ) $ (98,162 ) $ 9,110 $ 3,051,626 Balance, January 1, 2011 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options Employee benefits Employee Stock Purchase Plan Stock-based compensation Net income Unrealized losses on AFS securities, net Foreign currency translation adjustment Acquisition of Hughes Communications Balance, December 31, 2011 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options Employee benefits Employee Stock Purchase Plan Stock-based compensation Other Net income (loss) Unrealized losses on AFS securities, net and other Foreign currency translation adjustment Balance, December 31, 2012 Issuances of Class A common stock: Exercise of stock options Employee benefits Employee Stock Purchase Plan Stock-based compensation Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises Other, net Net income Unrealized losses on AFS securities, net and other Foreign currency translation adjustment Balance, December 31, 2013 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Net income (loss) $ 4,274 $ 204,358 $ 364,704 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 385,894 228,911 244,129 Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates (11,860 ) 2,813 5,517 Unrealized and realized (gains) losses on marketable investment securities and other investments (13,666 ) (2,923 ) (119,461 ) Unrealized (gains) losses on investments accounted for at fair value, net (15,871 ) (144,473 ) (313,000 ) Impairment of long-lived asset 32,964 — — Non-cash, stock-based compensation 16,064 13,546 13,371 Deferred tax expense (benefit) (8,974 ) 103,569 45,344 Other, net 2,171 (3,067 ) (12,584 ) Change in noncurrent assets 2,058 19,715 (6,785 ) Changes in current assets and current liabilities: Trade accounts receivable (9,139 ) 40,623 (52,797 ) Allowance for doubtful accounts 10,841 2,039 (1,576 ) Trade accounts receivable - DISH Network 8,145 32,544 27,088 Inventory 21,488 22,581 (6,521 ) Other current assets 35,681 (61,862 ) (1,376 ) Trade accounts payable (12,193 ) (33,404 ) (15,255 ) Trade accounts payable - DISH Network 2,219 (24,192 ) 16,777 Accrued expenses and other (3,078 ) 3,237 8,701 Net cash flows from operating activities 447,018 404,015 196,276 Cash Flows From Investing Activities: Purchases of marketable investment securities (2,051,444 ) (2,300,631 ) (2,050,495 ) Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities 1,981,197 2,253,819 2,273,523 Purchases of property and equipment (377,172 ) (196,736 ) (213,921 ) Launch service assigned to DISH Network (Note 17) — 102,913 — Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities (1,624 ) 577 (15,009 ) Acquisition of Hughes Communications, net of cash acquired of $98,900 (Note 13) (2,075,713 ) — — Purchase of strategic investments included in marketable and other investment securities (73,047 ) (69,072 ) (114,164 ) Investment in Move Networks (Note 13) — (44,991 ) — Proceeds from sale of strategic investments 712,935 15,609 — Other, net (3,177 ) (46 ) 5,788 Net cash flows from investing activities (1,888,045 ) (238,558 ) (114,278 ) Cash Flows From Financing Activities: Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 2,000,000 — — Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations (60,201 ) (50,382 ) (55,644 ) Debt issuance costs (57,825 ) — — Class A common stock repurchases (Note 10) — (605 ) (29,512 ) Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan 28,718 4,014 2,021 Other 2,855 — — Net cash flows from financing activities 1,913,547 (46,973 ) (83,135 ) Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents (299 ) — — Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 472,221 118,484 (1,137 ) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 141,814 23,330 24,467 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 614,035 $ 141,814 $ 23,330 Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: Cash paid for interest (including capitalized interest) $ 120,452 $ 41,021 $ 31,767 Capitalized interest $ 42,743 $ 25,812 $ — Cash received for interest $ 13,022 $ 19,028 $ 11,717 Cash paid for income taxes $ 2,173 $ 15,240 $ 31,500 Employee benefits paid in Class A common stock $ 4,046 $ 3,856 $ 1,391 Launch service assigned to DISH Network (Note 17) $ — $ — $ 102,913 Satellites and other assets financed under capital lease obligations $ 198,468 $ 57,397 $ 155,574 Reduction of capital lease obligations and associated asset value for AMC-15 (Note 6) $ 20,214 $ — $ — Reduction of capital lease obligations and associated asset value for AMC-16 (Note 6) $ — $ 39,442 $ — Reduction of capital lease obligations for AMC-16 (Note 6) $ 6,616 $ — $ — Capital expenditures included in accounts payable $ 26,330 $ 7,272 $ — Cash Flows from Operating Activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates, net Impairment of long-lived assets Stock-based compensation Deferred tax benefit Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net: Trade accounts receivable Allowance for doubtful accounts Trade accounts receivable—DISH Network Inventory Other current assets Trade accounts payable Trade accounts payable—DISH Network Accrued expenses and other Changes in noncurrent assets and noncurrent liabilities, net Other, net Net cash flows from operating activities Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Purchases of marketable investment securities Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities Purchases of property and equipment Changes in restricted cash and marketable investment securities Acquisition of Hughes Communications, net of cash acquired of $98,900 Acquisition of regulatory authorizations Proceeds from asset transfer to DISH Network Purchase of strategic investments Distribution received from investment in affiliates Proceeds from sale of strategic investments Other, net Net cash flows from investing activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan Repayment of long-term debt and capital lease obligations Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Debt issuance costs Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises Other Net cash flows from financing activities Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents, end of period Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: Cash paid for interest (including capitalized interest) Capitalized interest Cash paid for income taxes Employee benefits paid in Class A common stock Satellites and other assets financed under capital lease obligations Capitalized in-orbit incentive obligations Reduction of capital lease obligations and associated asset value Reduction of capital lease obligation for AMC-16 Changes in capital expenditures included in accounts payable Contribution of assets to Dish Digital Liabilities assumed in regulatory authorization acquisition The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. Note 1. Organization and Business Activities Principal Business We currently operate in three business segments. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles Foreign Currency Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents as of December 31, NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued Marketable Investment Securities We Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date. We evaluate our marketable investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis to determine whether declines in the fair value of these securities are other-than-temporary. In general, we use the Other Investment Securities—Cost and Equity Method Generally, we account for our non-marketable equity investments using either the equity method or cost method of accounting. It is not practicable to regularly estimate the fair value of our equity securities that are not publicly traded. We evaluate these equity investments on a quarterly basis to determine whether an event or changes in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. As part of our evaluation, we review available information such as business plans and current financial statements of these companies for factors that may indicate an impairment of our investments. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material litigation, violations of debt covenants, bankruptcy and changes in business strategy. When we determine that an investment is impaired, and the impairment is NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued other-than-temporary, we adjust the carrying amount of the investment to its estimated fair value and recognize the impairment loss in earnings. Investments in which we own at least 20% of the voting securities or have significant influence are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for our proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of the investee, which is reflected in "Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The carrying amount of our investments may include a component of goodwill if the cost of our investment exceeds the fair value of the underlying identifiable assets and liabilities of the investee. Dividends received from equity method investees reduce the carrying amount of the investment. Accounts Receivable Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost, Property and Equipment Property and equipment We review our long-lived assets for NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquired businesses over the estimated fair value assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We do not amortize goodwill, but test goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may exist in interim periods. Our goodwill as of December 31, 2013, consists entirely of goodwill assigned to reporting units of our Hughes segment in connection with the 2011 acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("the Hughes Acquisition"). We test Hughes goodwill for impairment in the second fiscal quarter. There are two steps to the goodwill impairment test. Step one compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. We typically estimate fair value of the reporting units using discounted cash flow techniques, which includes significant assumptions about prospective financial information, terminal value and discount rates. If the reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, it is necessary to perform the second step of the impairment test, which compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of such goodwill to determine the amount of impairment loss. We may bypass the two-step goodwill impairment test if we determine, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount including goodwill. See Note 9 for further discussion of our goodwill impairment testing. Regulatory Authorizations and Other Intangible Assets At acquisition and periodically thereafter, we evaluate our intangible assets to determine whether their useful lives are finite or indefinite. We consider useful life. Intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, ranging from approximately one to recoverable, as discussed above under "Impairment of Long-lived Assets." We do not amortize NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL Income Taxes We establish a provision for income taxes currently payable or receivable and for income tax amounts deferred to future periods. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the estimated future tax effects of differences that exist between the the foreseeable future. From time to time, we engage in transactions where the income tax consequences may be subject to uncertainty. We Fair Value Measurements We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of Transfers between levels in the fair value hierarchy are considered to occur at the beginning of the quarterly accounting period. There were no transfers between levels for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 or 2012. As of December 31, NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued Fair values of our current marketable investment securities are based on a variety of observable market inputs. For our investments in publicly traded equity securities, fair value ordinarily is determined based on a Level 1 measurement that reflects quoted prices for identical securities in active markets. Fair values of our investments in marketable debt securities generally are based on Level 2 measurements as the markets for debt securities are less active. Trades of identical debt securities on or near the measurement date are considered a strong indication of fair value. Matrix pricing techniques that consider par value, coupon rate, credit quality, maturity and other relevant features also may be used to determine fair value of our investments in marketable debt securities. Fair values for our publicly traded long-term debt are based on quoted market prices in less active markets and are categorized as Level 2 measurements. The fair values of our privately held debt are Level 2 measurements and are estimated to approximate their carrying amounts based on the proximity of their interest rates to current market rates. See Note 10 for the fair value of our long-term debt. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair values of our orbital incentive obligations, based on measurements categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, approximated their carrying amounts of $48.4 million and $30.0 million, respectively. We use fair value measurements from time-to-time in connection with impairment testing and the assignment of purchase consideration to assets and liabilities of acquired companies. Those fair value measurements typically include significant unobservable inputs and are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, prices are fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured, and the goods have been delivered or services have been In situations where customer offerings represent a bundled arrangement for both services and hardware, revenue elements are separated Our Hughes segment has a consumer equipment rental program, under which NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued In addition to providing standard product and service offerings, our Hughes segment also enters into contracts to design, develop, and deliver complex telecommunication networks to customers in We report revenue net of sales taxes imposed on our goods and services in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Since we primarily act as an agent for the governmental authorities, the amount charged to the customer is collected and remitted directly to the appropriate jurisdictional entity. Debt Issuance Costs Costs of issuing debt generally are Cost of Equipment and Services Cost of equipment primarily consists of materials and direct labor Research and Development Deferred Subscriber Acquisition Costs ("SAC") Deferred SAC is included in NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued recoverability of SAC and are entitled to an early termination fee Capitalized Software Costs Stock-based Compensation Expense Stock-based compensation expense is recognized based on stock awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. Advertising Costs Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in "Selling, general and administrative expenses" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we incurred advertising expense of $47.4 million, $47.0 million and $27.8 million, respectively. New Accounting Pronouncements In NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL Note 3. We present both basic earnings per share The potential dilution from stock awards was computed using the treasury stock method based on the average market value of our Class A common For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 (In thousands, except per share amounts) Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar $ 3,639 $ 204,358 $ 364,704 Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Class A and B common stock: Basic 86,223 85,084 85,765 Dilutive impact of stock awards outstanding 866 119 294 Diluted 87,089 85,203 86,059 Earnings per share - Class A and B common stock: Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar $ 0.04 $ 2.40 $ 4.25 Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar $ 0.04 $ 2.40 $ 4.24 The following Net income attributable to EchoStar Weighted-average common shares outstanding—Class A and B common stock: Basic Dilutive impact of stock awards outstanding Diluted Earnings per share—Class A and B common stock: Basic Diluted Note 4. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Related Tax Effects We have not recognized any tax effects on foreign currency translation adjustments because they are not expected to result in future taxable income or deductions. We have not recognized any tax effects on unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities because such gains or losses would affect the amount of existing capital loss carryforwards for which the related deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance. Accumulated other comprehensive income includes cumulative foreign currency translation losses of $32.1 million, $16.6 million and $14.0 million as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 2010 2009 (In thousands) Performance based options 659 697 724 Restricted Performance Units 74 93 100 Total 733 790 824 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL Our marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other As of December 31, 2011 2010 (In thousands) Marketable investment securities - current: VRDNs $ 218,665 $ 395,715 Strategic 216,090 232,718 Other 647,652 360,653 Total marketable investment securities - current 1,082,407 989,086 Restricted marketable investment securities (1) 3,939 1,337 Total 1,086,346 990,423 Restricted cash and cash equivalents (1) 20,347 16,089 Marketable and other investment securities - noncurrent: Cost method 26,193 3,097 Equity method 114,246 109,366 Fair value method — 613,125 Total marketable and other investment securities - noncurrent 140,439 725,588 Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and other investment securities $ 1,247,132 $ 1,732,100 Marketable investment securities—current: Corporate bonds VRDNs Strategic equity securities Other Total marketable investment securities—current Restricted marketable investment securities(1) Total Restricted cash and cash equivalents(1) Other investments—noncurrent: Cost method Equity method Total other investments—noncurrent Total marketable investment securities, restricted cash and cash equivalents, and other investments Marketable Investment Securities Corporate bonds Our corporate bond portfolio includes debt instruments issued by individual corporations, primarily in the industrial and financial services industries. Variable rate demand notes VRDNs are long-term floating rate NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued Strategic Equity Securities Our such shares of common stock. We did not receive any dividend income for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we received $46.0 million in dividend income from one of our strategic investments. Our other current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in various debt instruments, including Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities As of December 31, Other Investments—Noncurrent of accounting. Our ability to realize value from our strategic investments in companies that are not publicly traded depends on the success of those As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our equity method investments included $18.0 and $34.5 million, respectively, for our investment in DISH Digital Holding L.L.C. ("DISH Digital"), a joint venture between us and DISH Network. The carrying amount of our investment reflects the $44.7 million aggregate carrying amount of cash and certain noncash assets that we contributed to DISH Digital upon its formation on July 1, 2012 in exchange for a one-third equity interest in DISH Digital, less our equity in the net loss of DISH Digital of $16.5 million and $10.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Note 19 for additional information about our investment in DISH Digital. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities As of December 31, 2011 2010 Marketable Marketable Investment Unrealized Investment Unrealized Securities Gains Losses Net Securities Gains Losses Net (In thousands) Debt securities: VRDNs $ 218,665 $ — $ — $ — $ 395,715 $ — $ — $ — Other (including restricted) 651,591 253 (2,715 ) (2,462 ) 375,814 1,154 (233 ) 921 Equity securities: Other 216,090 182,214 — 182,214 218,894 186,745 — 186,745 Total marketable investment securities $ 1,086,346 $ 182,467 $ (2,715 ) $ 179,752 $ 990,423 $ 187,899 $ (233 ) $ 187,666 As of December 31, 2013 Debt securities: Corporate bonds VRDNs Other (including restricted) Equity securities—strategic Total marketable investment securities As of December 31, 2012 Debt securities: Corporate bonds VRDNs Other (including restricted) Equity securities—strategic Total marketable investment securities As of December 31, Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position The following table reflects the length of time that our available-for-sale As of December 31, 2011 2010 Fair Value Unrealized Fair Value Unrealized (In thousands) Less than Six Months: $ 431,410 $ (1,598 ) $ 26,358 $ (44 ) Six to Nine Months: 76,515 (1,111 ) 17,566 (71 ) Nine Months or More: 3,931 (6 ) 75,211 (118 ) Total $ 511,856 $ (2,715 ) $ 119,135 $ (233 ) Less than 12 months 12 months or more Total NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL Realized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities We recognized gains from the sales of our available-for-sale marketable investment securities of $36.3 million, $175.2 million and $6.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We recognized minimal losses from the sales of our available-for-sale marketable investment securities for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Proceeds from sales of our available-for-sale marketable investment securities totaled $177.5 million, $601.3 million and $1.54 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fair Value Measurements Our As of December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (In thousands) Cash equivalents (including restricted) $ 543,243 $ 16,197 $ 527,046 $ — $ 131,160 $ 24,371 $ 106,789 $ — Debt securities: VRDNs $ 218,665 $ — $ 218,665 $ — $ 395,715 $ — $ 395,715 $ — Other (including restricted) 651,591 — 651,591 — 375,814 — 375,814 — Equity securities - strategic 216,090 216,090 — — 218,894 218,894 — — Marketable and other investment securities - noncurrent — — — — 613,125 4,170 — 608,955 Total assets at fair value $ 1,086,346 $ 216,090 $ 870,256 $ — $ 1,603,548 $ 223,064 $ 771,529 $ 608,955 Level 3 (In thousands) Balance as of December 31, 2010 $ 608,955 Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings 9,194 Purchases 51,936 Issuances 27,313 Settlements (697,398 ) Balance as of December 31, 2011 $ — For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 (In thousands) Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments: Marketable investment securities - gains (losses) on sales/exchanges $ 6,637 $ 30,231 $ 126,232 Marketable and other investment securities - gains (losses) on sales/exchanges 7,029 9,437 — Marketable and other investment securities - other-than-temporary impairments — (36,745 ) (6,771 ) Total unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments $ 13,666 $ 2,923 $ 119,461 table below. As of December 31, Cash equivalents (including restricted) Debt securities: Corporate bonds VRDNs Other (including restricted) Equity securities—strategic Total marketable investment securities During 2011, we As of December 31, 2011 2010 (In thousands) Finished goods $ 49,038 $ 21,084 Raw materials 11,212 6,819 Work-in-process 8,457 2,530 Total inventory $ 68,707 $ 30,433 Depreciable Life As of December 31, (In Years) 2011 2010 (In thousands) Land — $ 41,516 $ 28,240 Buildings and improvements 1-40 350,041 232,208 Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other 1-10 947,647 791,247 Customer rental equipment 1-4 158,371 — Satellites: EchoStar III - fully depreciated N/A 234,083 234,083 EchoStar IV - fully depreciated N/A 78,511 78,511 EchoStar VI 12 244,305 244,305 EchoStar VIII 12 175,801 175,801 EchoStar IX 12 127,376 127,376 EchoStar XII 10 190,051 190,051 SPACEWAY 3 15 286,707 — Satellites acquired under capital leases 10-15 906,526 534,673 Construction in progress — 716,486 393,098 Total property and equipment 4,457,421 3,029,593 Accumulated depreciation (2,003,875 ) (1,766,290 ) Property and equipment, net $ 2,453,546 $ 1,263,303 As of December 31, 2011 2010 (In thousands) Progress amounts for satellite construction, including certain amounts prepaid under satellite service agreements and launch costs: QuetzSat-1 $ — $ 162,947 EchoStar XVI 232,364 100,312 EchoStar XVII/Jupiter 365,721 — CMBStar 19,210 45,904 Other 20,291 48,054 Buildings and improvements 133 19,291 Uplinking equipment 60,233 11,933 Other 18,534 4,657 Construction in progress $ 716,486 $ 393,098 For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 (In thousands) Satellites $ 112,182 $ 92,750 $ 105,270 Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other 157,274 98,481 99,428 Identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization 107,022 31,095 33,057 Buildings and improvements 9,416 6,585 6,374 Total depreciation and amortization $ 385,894 $ 228,911 $ 244,129 Note 6. Trade Accounts Receivable Our trade accounts receivable consisted of the following: Trade accounts receivable Contracts in process, net Total trade accounts receivable Allowance for doubtful accounts Trade accounts receivable—DISH Network Total trade accounts receivable, net NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, progress billings offset against contracts in process amounted to $2.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Note 7. Inventory Our inventory consisted of the following: Finished goods Raw materials Work-in-process Total inventory Note 8. Property and Equipment Property and equipment consisted of the following: Land Buildings and improvements Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other Customer rental equipment Satellites—owned(1) Satellites acquired under capital leases Construction in progress Total property and equipment Accumulated depreciation(1) Property and equipment, net NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, accumulated depreciation "Construction in progress" consisted of the following: Progress amounts for satellite construction, including certain amounts prepaid under satellite service agreements and launch costs: EchoStar XIX TerreStar-2 EchoStar XVI Other Uplinking equipment Other Construction in progress For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $4.0 million, $45.5 million and $42.7 million, respectively, of capitalized interest related to our satellites under construction. Depreciation expense associated with our property and equipment consisted of the following: Satellites Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other Customer rental equipment Buildings and improvements Total depreciation expense Satellites depreciation expense includes amortization of satellites under capital lease agreements of $59.7 million, $59.7 million and $33.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our depreciation expense increased in 2012 and 2011 as a result of the Hughes Acquisition. See Note 15 for further discussion. Satellites NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued depreciate our owned satellites on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each satellite. Information for our satellite fleet is presented below. Original Degree Orbital Useful Life/ Launch Location Lease Term Satellites Date (West Longitude) (In Years) Owned: EchoStar III (1) (2) October 1997 61.5 12 EchoStar VI (1) July 2000 77 12 EchoStar VIII (1) August 2002 77 12 EchoStar IX (1) August 2003 121 12 EchoStar XII (1) July 2003 61.5 10 SPACEWAY 3 (4) August 2007 95 12 Leased from DISH Network: EchoStar I (1) December 1995 77 12 Leased from Other Third Parties: AMC-15 (3) December 2004 105 10 AMC-16 (3) January 2005 85 10 Nimiq 5 (1) (3) September 2009 72.7 15 QuetzSat-1 (1) (3) September 2011 67.1 10 Under Construction (owned) : EchoStar XVI (1) Expected in 2012 61.5 15 EchoStar XVII/Jupiter Expected in 2012 107 15 CMBStar Construction Suspended Owned: SPACEWAY3(4) EchoStar XVII EchoStar III(1)(2) EchoStar VI EchoStar VIII(1) EchoStar IX(1) EchoStar XII(1)(5) EchoStar XVI(1) Leased from Other Third Parties(3): AMC-15 AMC-16 Nimiq 5(1) QuetzSat-1(1) leases and their launch dates represent dates that the satellites were placed into service. Recent Developments EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI, EchoStar XIV. On February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with DISH Network to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, EchoStar and HSS will issue shares of preferred tracking stock to DISH Network in exchange for five satellites owned by DISH Network (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV) (including related in-orbit incentive obligations and interest payments of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, DISH Network will lease certain satellite capacity on these five satellites (collectively, the "Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction"). See Note 20 for a discussion of our subsequent events.(1)Financial StatementsPage Page
F-1atas of December 31, 20112013 and 201020122011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011(2)Financial Statement SchedulesI - I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent Company Information)Information Only):SheetSheets as of December 31, 2011 (Parent Company Only)2013 and 2012F-62F-63F-64F-76 F-65Exhibits(3)Exhibits2.1* 2.1* Form of Separation Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).
2.2*2.2*
Agreement and Plan of Merger between EchoStar Corporation, EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., Broadband Acquisition Corporation and Hughes Communications, Inc. dated as of February 13, 2011 (incorporated by reference fromto Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Hughes Communications, Inc. filed February 15, 2011, Commission File No. 1-33040). *****
3.1*3.1*
Articles of Incorporation of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 31 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28,12, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807), as amended by the Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to EchoStar Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2008, Commission File No. 001-33807).
3.2*3.2*
Bylaws of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 31 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28,12, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807). 4.1* 4.1*Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.2*4.2*
Indenture relating to the EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation) 6 1/2%1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019, dated as of June 1, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent and trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.3*4.3*
Indenture relating to the EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation) 7 5/8%5/8% Senior Notes due 2021, dated as of June 1, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.4*
Supplemental Indenture relating to the 6 1/2%1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 of EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent and trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.5*4.5*
Supplemental Indenture relating to the 7 5/8%5/8% Senior Notes due 2021 of EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among EH Holding Corporation, the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.6*4.6*
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2011, among EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), the guarantors listed on the signature page thereto and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
4.7*4.7*
Security Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2011, among EH Holding Corporation (currently known as Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation), the guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.1*10.1*
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.2*10.2*
Form of Employee Matters Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).**10.3* 10.3*Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.5*10.4*Form of Management Services Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’s Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).10.5*
Manufacturing Agreement, dated as of March 22, 1995, between HTS and SCI Technology, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Dish Ltd., Commission File No. 33-81234).
10.6*10.6*
Agreement between HTS, DISH Network L.L.C. and ExpressVu Inc., dated January 8, 1997, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996, as amended, Commission File No. 0-26176).
10.7*10.7*
Agreement to Form NagraStar L.L.C., dated as of June 23, 1998, by and between Kudelski S.A., DISH Network Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998, Commission File No. 0-26176).
10.8*
Satellite Service Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2003, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.9*10.9*
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement dated March 31, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.10*10.10*
Satellite Service Agreement dated as of August 13, 2003 between SES Americom Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Commission File No. 0-26176). ****
10.11*10.11*
Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). ****
10.12*10.12*
Amendment No. 1 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated March 10, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.13*10.13*
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated February 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). ****
10.14*10.14*
Amendment No. 2 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). *****10.15* 10.15**
10.16*10.16*
Amendment No. 3 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated November 19, 2004 between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 1, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). ****
10.17*10.17*
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated November 19, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176). ****
10.18*10.18*
Amendment No. 6 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated December 20, 2004, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DISH Network Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.19*
Amendment No. 4 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated April 6, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.20*10.20*
Amendment No. 5 to Satellite Service Agreement, dated June 20, 2005, between SES Americom, Inc., DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DISH Network Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Commission File No. 0-26176).****
10.21*10.21*
Form of EchoStar Corporation 2008 Class B CEO Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 3 of EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Form 10 dated December 28, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).**
10.22*10.22*
Form of Satellite Capacity Agreement between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.28 to Amendment No. 2 to Form 10 of EchoStar Corporation filed on December 26, 2007, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.23*10.23*
Pricing Agreement, dated March 11, 2008, by and among EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., Bell ExpressVu Inc., in its capacity as General Partner of Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership, Bell Distribution Inc,Inc., and Bell Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Commission File No. 001-33807). ****
10.24*10.24*
QuetzSat-1 Satellite Service Agreement, dated November 24, 2008, between SES Latin America S.A. and EchoStar 77 Corporation, a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807). *****10.25* 10.25* ****
10.26*10.26*
Bell TV Pricing Amendment, dated February 6, 2009, between EchoStar Corporation and Bell TV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807). ****
10.27*10.27*
Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.28*10.28*
Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.29*10.29*
Amended and Restated EchoStar Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14 filed March 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.30*10.30*
NIMIQ 5 Whole RF Channel Service Agreement, dated September 15, 2009, between Telesat Canada and EchoStar Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).****
10.31*
NIMIQ 5 Whole RF Channel Service Agreement, dated September 15, 2009, between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).****
10.32*10.32*
Professional Services Agreement, dated August 4, 2009, between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).****
10.33*10.33*
Allocation Agreement, dated August 4, 2009, between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.34*10.34*
Amendment to form of Satellite Capacity Agreement (Form A) between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.35*10.35*
Amendment to Form of Satellite Capacity Agreement (Form B) between EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C. and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).10.36* 10.36*CapacityTransponder Service Agreement between EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C.Operating Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).****
10.37*10.37*
Assignment of Rights Under Launch Service Contract from EchoStar Corporation to DISH Orbital II L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.38*10.38*
Contract between Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Space Systems/Loral, Inc. for the Hughes Jupiter Satellite Program dated June 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hughes Communications, Inc. filed August 7, 2009 (File No. 001-33040)). ****
10.39*10.39*
Launch Services Agreement by and between Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Arianespace dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hughes Network Systems, LLC filed August 4, 2010 (File No. 333-138009)). ****
10.40*10.40*
Employment Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2005 by and between Hughes Network Systems, LLC and Pradman Kaul (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Hughes Communications, Inc. filed December 5, 2005 (File No. 333-130136)).
10.41*10.41*
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2010 by and between Hughes Communications, Inc. and Pradman Kaul (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hughes Communications, Inc. filed March 3, 2011 (File No. 001-33040)).
10.42*10.42*
Memorandum of Understanding, dated May 6, 2011 by and among EchoStar Global B.V., EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., Bell ExpressVu Inc., Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership, Bell Mobility Inc., and Bell Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation filed August 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807). ****
10.43*
Cost Allocation Agreement, dated April 29, 2011, between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation filed August 9, 2011, Commission File No. 001-33807).
10.44*10.44*
Settlement and Patent License between TiVo Inc. and DISH Network Corporation and EchoStar Corporation, dated as of April 29, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of EchoStar Corporation filed February 21, 2012, Commission File No. 001-33807).****
10.45*
Receiver Agreement dated January 1, 2012 between Echosphere L.L.C and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation filed May 7, 2012, Commission File No. 001-33807).***2110.46*o
Broadcast Agreement dated January 1, 2012 between EchoStar Broadcasting Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation, filed May 7, 2012, Commission File No. 001-33807).***10.47 First Amendment to EchoStar XVI Satellite Transponder Service Agreement, dated December 21, 2012 between EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C.***
21(H)
Subsidiaries of EchoStar Corporation.
23(H)23o
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
24(H)24o
Powers of Attorney authorizing signature of Charles W. Ergen, R. Stanton Dodge, Anthony M. Federico, Pradman P. Kaul, David K. Moskowitz, Tom A. Ortolf and C. Michael Schroeder.
31.1(H)31.1o
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31.2(H)31.2o
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32.1(H)32.1o
Section 906 CertificationCertifications of Chief Executive Officer.32.2oSection 906 Certification ofOfficer and Chief Financial Officer.
10199.1*Amendment No. 1 to Receiver Agreement dated December 31, 2007 between EchoSphere L.L.C. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Commission File No. 001-33807). ****99.2*Amendment No. 1 to Broadcast Agreement dated December 31, 2007 between EchoStar Corporation and DISH Network L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EchoStar Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Commission File No. 001-33807). ****101***
The following materials from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, filed on March 7, 2012,February 21, 2014, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”("XBRL"): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’Stockholders' Equity, (Deficit), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) related notes to these financial statements.oIn accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the information in this Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by the specific reference in such filing.*****ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONECHOSTAR CORPORATION By:
By:
/s/ DAVID J. RAYNER
David J. RaynerKenneth G. CarrollKenneth G. Carroll and
Chief Financial Officer, and
TreasurerMarch 7, 2012
Michael T. Dugan
and DirectorMarch 7, 2012Michael T. DuganFebruary 21, 2014
/s/ Kenneth G. CarrollDAVID J. RAYNER
David J. Rayner
Executive Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer,March 7, 2012Kenneth G. Carroll
February 21, 2014
*ChairmanMarch 7, 2012
Charles W. Ergen
Chairman
February 21, 2014
*DirectorMarch 7, 2012
R. Stanton Dodge
Director
February 21, 2014
*DirectorMarch 7, 2012
Anthony M. Federico
Director
February 21, 2014
*DirectorMarch 7, 2012
Pradman P. Kaul
Director*DirectorMarch 7, 2012David K. Moskowitz*DirectorMarch 7, 2012Tom A. Ortolf*DirectorMarch 7, 2012C. Michael Schroeder
February 21, 2014 * By:/s/ Dean A. MansonDean A. MansonAttorney-in-Fact*
Tom A. OrtolfDirector February 21, 2014
*
C. Michael Schroeder
Director
February 21, 2014
*By:
/s/ DEAN A. MANSON
Dean A. Manson
Attorney-in-FactPageF-1 Consolidated Financial Statements:atas of December 31, 20112013 and 201020122011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011
EchoStar Corporation:20112013 and 2010,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’stockholders' equity, (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20112013 and the financial statement schedules I and II. We also have audited EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’sManagement's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules, and an opinion on EchoStar Corporation’sCorporation's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scompany's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM20112013 and 2010,2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.2011,2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the COSO. Management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, excluded Hughes Communications, Inc., which was acquired in 2011. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of this subsidiary. The aggregate amount of total assets and revenue of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements of EchoStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2.709 billion and $676 million, respectively.
Denver, ColoradoMarch 7, 2012February 21, 2014
(Dollars inIn thousands, except share amounts) As of December 31, 2013 2012 $ 634,119 $ 731,614 986,533 815,951 159,292 211,373 355,135 281,845 66,084 84,348 55,400 55,299 69,633 23,317 29,930 10,902 2,356,126 2,214,649 16,137 29,045 2,546,377 2,612,284 583,900 562,712 504,173 507,924 262,039 347,496 169,771 183,211 89,811 1,070 173,629 141,842 4,345,837 4,385,584 $ 6,701,963 $ 6,600,233 $ 201,416 $ 284,728 55,743 26,960 69,791 67,706 57,592 47,652 30,940 29,008 24,010 18,034 118,953 113,237 558,445 587,325 2,352,597 2,420,793 488,206 373,447 76,484 68,441 2,917,287 2,862,681 3,475,732 3,450,006
— — 48 45 48 48 — — — — 3,502,005 3,394,646 (14,655 ) 18,752 (171,914 ) (174,439 ) (98,162 ) (98,162 ) 3,217,370 3,140,890 8,861 9,337 3,226,231 3,150,227 $ 6,701,963 $ 6,600,233
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share amounts) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ 1,311,446 $ 1,028,588 $ 1,158,293 347,910 621,495 513,504 620,189 515,176 496,636 1,002,907 956,445 592,998 3,282,452 3,121,704 2,761,431 1,430,777 1,397,512 1,414,791 776,121 691,922 492,702 357,432 367,816 288,575 1,067 4,828 14,701 67,942 69,649 50,966 507,111 457,326 385,894 38,415 32,765 32,964 3,178,865 3,021,818 2,680,593 103,587 99,886 80,838 14,656 11,176 10,821 (192,554 ) (153,029 ) (82,593 ) 38,341 177,558 13,666 — — 15,871 (5,024 ) (438 ) 11,860 6,958 59,531 (24,688 ) (137,623 ) 94,798 (55,063 ) (34,036 ) 194,684 25,775 37,437 16,329 (21,501 ) 3,401 211,013 4,274 876 (35 ) 635 $ 2,525 $ 211,048 $ 3,639 89,405 87,150 86,223 90,952 87,959 87,089 $ 0.03 $ 2.42 $ 0.04 $ 0.03 $ 2.40 $ 0.04 $ 3,401 $ 211,013 $ 4,274 (16,394 ) (2,501 ) (15,298 ) 18,413 30,799 (1,276 ) (36,312 ) (175,223 ) (6,637 ) (34,293 ) (146,925 ) (23,211 ) (30,892 ) 64,088 (18,937 ) (10 ) 59 (568 ) $ (30,882 ) $ 64,029 $ (18,369 )
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(In thousands) Class
A and B
Common
Stock Additional
Paid-In
Capital Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) Accumulated
Deficit Treasury
Stock Noncontrolling
Interests Total $ 91 $ 3,311,405 $ 188,982 $ (389,126 ) $ (98,162 ) $ — $ 3,013,190 2 25,609 — — — — 25,611 — 4,046 — — — — 4,046 — 3,177 — — — — 3,177 — 16,064 — — — — 16,064 — — — 3,639 — 635 4,274 — — (7,913 ) — — — (7,913 ) — — (15,298 ) — — (1,203 ) (16,501 ) — — — — — 9,678 9,678 93 3,360,301 165,771 (385,487 ) (98,162 ) 9,110 3,051,626 — 11,469 — — — — 11,469 — 4,282 — — — — 4,282 — 3,929 — — — — 3,929 — 14,585 — — — — 14,585 — 80 — — — 168 248 — — — 211,048 — (35 ) 211,013 — — (144,424 ) — — — (144,424 ) — — (2,595 ) — — 94 (2,501 ) 93 3,394,646 18,752 (174,439 ) (98,162 ) 9,337 3,150,227 3 61,461 — — — — 61,464 — 4,761 — — — — 4,761 — 9,783 — — — — 9,783 — 18,353 — — — — 18,353 — 12,663 — — — — 12,663 — 338 — — — (466 ) (128 ) — — — 2,525 — 876 3,401 — — (17,899 ) — — — (17,899 ) — — (15,508 ) — — (886 ) (16,394 ) $ 96 $ 3,502,005 $ (14,655 ) $ (171,914 ) $ (98,162 ) $ 8,861 $ 3,226,231
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ 3,401 $ 211,013 $ 4,274 507,111 457,326 385,894 (38,341 ) (177,558 ) (13,666 ) — — (15,871 ) 5,024 438 (11,860 ) 38,415 32,765 32,964 18,353 14,585 16,064 (35,780 ) (1,075 ) (8,974 ) 42,580 1,357 (9,139 ) (2,995 ) (1,590 ) 10,841 (77,790 ) (56,735 ) 8,145 16,529 (16,109 ) 21,488 5,182 10,447 35,681 (76,497 ) 65,577 (12,193 ) 28,783 10,597 2,219 38,085 (18,197 ) (3,078 ) (41,650 ) (42,302 ) 2,058 20,097 14,610 2,171 450,507 505,149 447,018 (1,080,437 ) (971,154 ) (2,051,444 ) 912,030 1,248,748 1,981,197 (391,873 ) (513,005 ) (377,172 ) 12,908 (4,759 ) (1,624 ) — — (2,075,713 ) (41,748 ) (98,477 ) — 40,398 — — (7,428 ) (2,608 ) (73,047 ) — 7,500 — — — 712,935 (14,139 ) (13,026 ) (3,177 ) (570,289 ) (346,781 ) (1,888,045 ) 71,247 15,398 28,718 (68,225 ) (60,022 ) (59,493 ) 3,467 1,641 2,000,000 — (229 ) (57,825 ) 12,663 — — (826 ) (764 ) 2,147 18,326 (43,976 ) 1,913,547 3,961 3,187 (299 ) (97,495 ) 117,579 472,221 731,614 614,035 141,814 $ 634,119 $ 731,614 $ 614,035 $ 188,331 $ 192,611 $ 120,452 $ 3,968 $ 45,497 $ 42,743 $ 16,728 $ 15,798 $ 2,173 $ 4,761 $ 4,282 $ 4,046 $ 5,316 $ 30,317 $ 198,468 $ 18,000 $ 24,950 $ — $ — $ — $ 20,214 $ 6,694 $ 12,599 $ 6,616 $ 9,240 $ 16,812 $ 26,330 $ — $ 44,712 $ — $ 10,304 $ — $ —
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSWe wereEchoStar Corporation (together with its subsidiaries is referred to as "EchoStar," the "Company," "we," "us" and/or "our") is a holding company that was organized in October 2007 as a corporation under the laws of the State of Nevada. EchoStarIn 2008, DISH Network Corporation is a holding company, whoseand its subsidiaries (which together with EchoStar Corporation are referred("DISH Network") completed its distribution to as “EchoStar,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our”us of its digital set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of their satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate, and other assets and related liabilities to us (the "Spin-off"). On June 8, 2011, we acquired allSince the Spin-off, EchoStar and DISH Network have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and as of December 31, 2013, neither entity has any ownership interest in the other (See Note 20 of this report for a discussion of our subsequent events). However, a substantial majority of the outstanding equityvoting power of Hughes Communications, Inc. (the “Hughes Acquisition”). Following the Hughes Acquisition, weshares of both companies is beneficially owned by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family. Our Class A common stock is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "SATS." We are a global provider of satellite operations, video delivery solutions digital set-top boxes, and broadband satellite technologies and services for home and office, delivering innovative network technologies, managed services, and solutions for enterprises and governments.·EchoStar Technologies—whichdesigns, develops and distributes digital set-top boxes and related products and technology, including our Slingbox “placeshifting” technology, primarily for satellite TV service providers, telecommunication and cable companies and with respect to Slingboxes, directly to consumers via retail outlets.international cable companies. Our EchoStar Technologies segment also provides digital broadcast operations, including satellite uplinking/downlinking, transmission services, signal processing, conditional access management, and other services, primarily to DISH Network. In addition, we provide our Slingboxes directly to consumers via retail outlets and online.·10certain of our 11 owned and leased in-orbit satellites and related Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses to lease capacity on a full-time and occasional-use basis primarily to DISH Network and secondarily to Dish Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“("Dish Mexico”Mexico"), U.S.a joint venture that we entered into in 2008, as well as United States government service providers, state agencies, Internetinternet service providers, broadcast news organizations, programmers, and private enterprise customers.·Hughes — which provides satellite broadband Internet access to North American consumers and broadband network services and systems to the domestic and international enterprise markets. Hughes also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems. Hughes became a new segment as a result of the Hughes Acquisition and the results of operations of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Hughes Communications”) are included in this report effective June 9, 2011. See Note 13 for further discussion of the Hughes Acquisition.Effective January 1, 2008, DISH Network completed its distribution to us (the “Spin-off”) of its digital set-top box business and certain infrastructure and other assets, including certain of its satellites, uplink and satellite transmission assets, real estate and other assets and related liabilities. Since the Spin-off, we and DISH Network have operated as separate publicly-traded companies, and neither entity has any ownership interest in the other. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, or by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.influenceinterest and variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of anthe investee, the cost method is used. All significant intercompany
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”("GAAP") requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements andbalance sheets, the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period.period, and certain information disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, amortization periods of deferred revenue and deferred subscriber acquisition costs, (“SAC”) amortization periods, percentage-of-completion related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, allowanceallowances for sales returns/returns and rebates, warranty obligations, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation, plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, capital leases,lease classifications, asset impairments, useful lives and amortization methods of property, equipment and intangible assets, and royalty obligations. Weakened economic conditions may increase the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonablerelevant under the circumstances. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.occur or prospectively if the revised estimate affects future periods.CertainThe functional currency for certain of our foreign operations haveis determined to be the local currency to be their functional currency. Accordingly, these foreign entitieswe translate assets and liabilities of these foreign entities from their local currencies to U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates whileand translate income and expense accounts are translated at themonthly average rates in effect during the period.rates. The resulting translation adjustment isadjustments are recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),” a separate componentother comprehensive income (loss) as "Foreign currency translation adjustments" in our Consolidated Statements of equity. Translation adjustments for foreign currency denominated equity investments are not materialOperations and are recorded as part of “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).”We also have foreign operations where the U.S. dollar has been determined as the functional currency. Gains and losses resulting from re-measurement of the foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities, and transactions into the U.S. dollarfunctional currency are recognized currentlyin "Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). We occasionally enter into forward exchange contracts to mitigate foreign currency exchange risks related to certain of our assets and liabilities and forecasted transactions. These forward contracts are not designated as qualified hedges and, therefore, changes in the statementsfair values of operationsthese derivatives are recognized in earnings. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the net transactions gains and losses that resulted from the re-measurement of the foreign currency and the related derivative gains and losses were not material in each of the periods presented herein.20112013 and 20102012 primarily consisted of money market funds, government bonds, corporate notes, and commercial paper. The cost of these investments approximates their fair value.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONcurrently classify allour marketable investment securities as available-for-sale, except in certain instances where we have accounted for certain securities as trading securities or are using the fair value method securities discussed below.method. We adjust the carrying value ofreport our available-for-sale securities toat fair value and reportgenerally recognize the related temporarydifference between fair value and amortized cost as unrealized gains and losses as a separate component of “Accumulatedin other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholders’ equity (deficit),” netas "Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities and other" in our Consolidated Statements of related deferred income tax.Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Declines in the fair value of a marketable investment security which are determined to be “other-than-temporary”other-than-temporary are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss),earnings thus establishing a new cost basis for such investment.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - ContinuedThis quarterlyOur evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things:·our marketable investment securitieseach security compared to its amortized cost;carrying amount,length of time and the extent to which the fair value of a security has been lower than amortized cost;·security, andsecurity;·security.security; andDeclines infair value of debt and equity investments below cost basis are generally accounted for as follows:investment to recovery.Length of Time Investment Has Been In a ContinuousLoss PositionTreatment of the Decline in Value(absent specific factors to the contrary)Less than six monthsGenerally, considered temporary.Six to nine monthsEvaluated on a case by case basis to determine whether any company or market-specific factors exist indicating that such decline is other-than-temporary.Greater than nine monthsGenerally, considered other-than-temporary. The decline in value is recorded as a charge to earnings.Additionally, in situations whereWhere the fair value of a debt security ishas declined below its carrying amount,amortized cost, we consider the decline to be other-than-temporary and record a charge to earnings if any of the following factors apply:·we have the intentintend to sell the security,··security’ssecurity's entire amortized cost basis, even if there is no intent to sell the security.first in, first outfirst-in, first-out ("FIFO") method to determine the cost basis on sales of marketable investment securities.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONManagement estimates requiredWe estimate allowances for the potential non-collectability of accounts receivable based upon past collection experience and consideration of other relevant factors. However, pastPast experience may not be indicative of future collections and therefore additional charges could be incurred in the future to reflect differences between estimated and actual collections.or market value. Our EchoStar Technologies segment inventory cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Our Hughes segment principally uses standard costs adjusted to reflect actual cost, based on variance analyses performed throughout the year which approximates the FIFO method, whenor net realizable value. We use standard costing methodologies in determining the cost exceeds market value.of certain of our finished goods and work-in-process inventories. Inventories are adjusted to net realizable value using management’sour best estimates of future use. In making assessments of future use or recovery, management considerswe consider the aging and composition of inventory balances, the effects of technological and/or design changes, forecasted future product demand based on firm or near-firm customer orders, and alternative means of disposition of excess or obsolete items.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continuedareis stated at cost.cost, less accumulated depreciation. The cost of our satellites includes construction costs, including the present value of in-orbit incentives payable to the satellite manufacturer, launch costs, capitalized interest, and related insurance premiums. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over lives ranging from one to forty40 years. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense when incurred. RenewalsCosts of renewals and betterments are capitalized.The costImpairment of satellites under construction, including certain amounts prepaid under our satellite service agreements, is capitalized during the construction phase, assuming the eventual successful launch and in-orbit operation of the satellite. If a satellite were to fail during launch or while in-orbit, the resultant loss would be charged to expense in the period such loss was incurred. The amount of any such loss would be reduced to the extent of insurance proceeds estimated to be received, if any.Long-LivedLong-lived Assetsimpairmentrecoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that thetheir carrying amount of an assetamounts may not be recoverable. ThisThe evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For assets which are held and used in operations, the asset would beis impaired if the carrying valueamount of the asset exceeded its undiscounted estimated future net cash flows. OnceWhen an impairmentasset is determined, the actual impairment is reported as the difference betweenimpaired, we adjust the carrying amount of such asset to its estimated fair value and recognize the fair value as estimated using discounted cash flows.impairment loss in earnings. Assets which are to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONrelevant cash flow, estimated future operating results, trends andour intangible assets to have indefinite lives when no significant legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other available information in assessing whetherfactors limit the carrying value of assets are recoverable.Intangible Assetstwenty years,30 years. When we expect to incur significant costs to renew or extend finite-lived intangible assets, we amortize the total initial and testedestimated renewal costs over the combined initial and assumed renewal terms. In such instances, actual renewal costs are capitalized when they are incurred. We test intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of anthe asset may not be recoverable.Goodwill, Indefinite Lived Assets and FCC Authorizationsgoodwill andour indefinite-lived intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, but test those assets for impairment annually or whenever indicators of impairments arise.more frequently if circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the asset may be impaired. Costs incurred to renew or extend indefinite-lived intangible assets are expensed as incurred.Generally, weOur indefinite-lived intangible assets include Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") authorizations and certain other contractual or regulatory rights to use spectrum at specified orbital locations (collectively "Regulatory Authorizations"). We have determined that our FCC authorizations have indefinite useful lives due to the following:·spectrum is aauthorizations are non-depleting asset;assets;·replacementrenewal satellite applications generally are generally authorized by the FCC subject to certain conditions, without substantial cost under a stable regulatory, legislative, and legal environment;·maintenance expenditures in orderrequired to obtain future cash flowsmaintain the authorization are not significant; and·assetsauthorizations indefinitely.In conducting our annual impairment testOur non-FCC regulatory authorizations consist primarily of authorizations in 2011,Europe and Brazil that we acquired in 2013 and 2012, respectively. We have determined that the estimated fair value of the FCC authorizations, calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded their carrying amount.those Regulatory AuthorizationsOur newly acquired Hughes segment will complete its goodwill impairment testing annually in the quarter ended June 30.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—ContinuedMarketable and Other Investment Securities — Cost and Equity MethodGenerally, we account for our unconsolidated equity investments under either the equity method or cost method of accounting. Because these equity securities are generally not publicly traded, it is not practical to regularly estimate the fair value of the investments; however, these investments are subject to an evaluation for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our investment. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, cash flow concerns, material litigation, violations of debt covenants, bankruptcy and changes in business strategy. The fair value of these equity investments is not estimated unless there are identified changes in circumstances that may indicate an impairment exists and these changes are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. When impairments occur related to our foreign investments, any cumulative translation adjustment associated with these investments will remain in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets until the investments are sold or otherwise liquidated; at which time, they will be released into our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).Marketable and Other Investment Securities — Fair Value MethodWe elect the fair value method for certain debt and equity investments in affiliates when we believe the fair value method of accounting provides more meaningful information to our investors. Changes in the fair value of marketable investment securities, non-marketable convertible debt, and interest on debt investment securities accounted for at fair value are recognized as “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The fair value of the non-marketable convertible debt is determined each reporting period based upon inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the debt, either directly or indirectly. The fair value analysis takes into consideration the price of the underlying company stock as well as changes in the credit market, including yield curves and interest rates. In addition, the fair value of these debt and equity investment securities takes into consideration the impact of any bankruptcy proceedings.Sales TaxesWe account for sales taxes imposed on our goods and services on a net basis in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Since we primarily act as an agent for the governmental authorities, the amount chargedfinite lives due to the customer is collectedabsence of largely perfunctory renewal provisions and remitted directly touncertainties about the appropriate jurisdictional entity.regulatory environments.bookfinancial reporting carrying amount and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believedetermine it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax assets will not be realized.Accounting for Uncertaintyrealized in Income Taxesrecord a liabilityrecognize tax benefits when, in management’smanagement's judgment, a tax filing position does not meet theis more likely than not threshold.of being sustained if challenged by the tax authorities. For tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold, we may recordnot recognize a liabilityportion of a tax benefit depending on management’smanagement's assessment of how the tax position will ultimately be settled. Due to the fact that we have substantial net operating loss carryforwards, our reserves for unrecognized tax benefits are netted against the deferred tax assets associated with our net operating loss carryforwards. We adjust our estimates periodically based on ongoing examinations by and settlements with various taxing authorities, as well as changes in tax laws, regulations and precedent. We classify interest and penalties, if any, associated with our uncertainunrecognized tax positionsbenefits as a component of “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” and “Other, net,” respectively.income tax expense.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - ContinuedFinancial Instrumentsvalues, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We utilize the highest level of inputs available according to the following hierarchy in determining fair value:20112013 and 2010,2012, the carrying valueamount of our cash and cash equivalents; current marketable investment securities,equivalents, trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts;accounts, accounts payable and currentaccrued liabilities iswere equal to or approximated fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONdelivered.rendered. If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all of the criteria are met. Revenue from equipment sales generally is generally recognized upon shipment to customers. Revenue from leasing equipment or services are recognized ratably over the lease period. Revenue from digital broadcast operations and satelliteother services and other isare recognized when the related services are performed. Upfront fees collected in connection with the service arrangements for customers in our Hughes segment consumer market are deferred and recognized as service revenue over the estimated subscriber life. into their relevant components (services or hardware) for revenue recognition purposes.purposes using the relative selling price method. We offer a rebate to qualifying new consumer subscribers in our Hughes segment and record a reduction inreduce related revenue in the same period in which the related sale occurs based on an estimate of the number of rebates that will be redeemed. This estimate is based on historical experience and actual sales during the promotion.typically allows customers in our consumer marketenter into a contract which requires that the customer pay rental and service charges for a minimum term of 24 months and the early cancellation of service is subject to rent equipment withpayment of a 24-month service contract.termination charge. Once the initial contract24 month term ends, it becomesconverts to a month-to-month contract. Revenue on the rental equipment is recognized on a monthly basis as service revenue over the customer contract term. In October 2012, our Hughes segment entered into a wholesale service agreement with dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. ("dishNET"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network. Under this agreement, dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase certain broadband equipment and to market, sell, and distribute Hughes satellite internet service. We recognize a monthly subscriber wholesale service fee as we provide the service.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONourits enterprise and telecommobile satellite systems markets. These contracts for telecommunication networks require significant effort to develop and construct the network, over an extended time period. Revenues are also earned from long-term contracts for the sale of mobile satellite communications systems. Sales under these long-term contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Depending on the nature of the deliverables in each arrangement, we recognize revenue under the cost-to-cost method or the units of delivery method. Under the cost-to-cost method, sales are recorded equivalent to costs incurred plus a portion of the profit expected to be realized, based onwhich is consistent with the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion.completion multiplied by the total estimated contract revenue. Under the units of delivery method, sales are recorded as products are delivered and costs are recognized based on the expected profit for the entire agreement. Profits expected to be realized on long-term contracts are based on estimates of total sale values and costs at completion. These estimates are reviewed and revised periodically throughout the lives of the contracts, and adjustments to profits resulting from such revisions are recorded in the accounting period in which the revisions are made. Estimated losses on contracts are recorded in the period in which they are identified. generally deferred and amortized utilizing the effective interest method with amortization included in “Interest"Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” oncapitalized" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued and materials costs associated with the procurement and manufacture of our products and indirect overhead incurred in the procurement and production process, including freight and royalties. Cost of equipment generally is generally recognized as products are delivered to customers. Cost of services primarily consists of costs of digital broadcast operations, transponder capacity service agreements, satellite services, hub infrastructure, customer care, wireline and wireless capacity, and direct labor costs associated with the service provided. Cost of services is recognized as the servicescosts are performed or incurred.The cost ofCosts incurred in research and development is charged to expenseactivities are expensed as incurred.“Other"Other noncurrent assets, net” onnet" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. SAC consists of costs paid to third-party dealers and customer service representative commissions on new service activations as well asand hardware upgrades and, in certain cases, the subsidy for the cost of hardware and installation services provided to customers at the inception of service as well asor hardware upgrade. SAC is deferred when a customer commits to a service agreement, and then the deferred SAC is amortized over the average life of the subscriber, currently estimated as the contractual term asin proportion to when the related service revenue is earned. We monitor the
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION (secured by customer credit card information) if the subscriber cancels service prior to the end of the commitment period. The recoverability of deferred SAC is reasonably assured through the monthly service fee charged to customers, theour ability to recover the equipment, and/or theour ability to charge an early termination fee.Software developmentDevelopment costs related to software for internal use and external useexternally marketed are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, not in excess of five years. Internal use capitalized software costs are included in “Property"Property and equipment, net”net" and external useexternally marketed capitalized software costs are included in “Other"Other noncurrent assets, net” onnet" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Software program reviews for external useexternally marketed capitalized software costs are conducted at least annually, or as events and circumstances warrant such a review, to determine if capitalized software development costs have been impairedare recoverable and to ensure that costs associated with programs that are no longer generating revenue are expensed. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the net carrying amount of externally marketed software was $31.4 million and $15.9 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $1.7 million, $0.3 million and minimal, respectively, of amortization expense relating to our externally marketed software.September 2011,July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08No. 2013-11 amending ASC 350 “Intangibles - Goodwillrequirements for the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. ASU No. 2013-11 requires entities to present in the financial statements an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward except to the extent such items are not available or not intended to be used at the reporting date to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position. In such instances, the unrecognized tax benefit is required to be presented in the financial statements as a liability and Other” related to goodwill impairment testing. Among other things, ASU 2011-08 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. Although early adoption is allowed, the amendmentcombined with deferred tax assets. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for impairment tests performed for fiscal yearsannual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011.2013. Early adoption is permitted. We doadopted ASU No. 2013-11 in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013, but did not expectretrospectively apply the standard to our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 tothis standard did not have a material impact on our financial position orcondition, results of operations.operations, or cash flows.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—ContinuedBasic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Earnings per Share(“EPS”("EPS") and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes potential dilution and is computed by dividing “Net"Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar”EchoStar" by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock awards were exercised.stock.stock during the period. The following table presents earnings per share amounts for all periods and the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding used in the calculation.As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were stock awards to purchase 4.0 million, 5.9 million and 4.7 million shares, respectively,calculation of our Class A common stock outstanding, not included in thediluted weighted-average common shares outstanding above, as their effect is antidilutive.Vesting ofexcluded (i) underlying options and rights to acquirepurchase shares of our Class A common stock grantedas their effect is anti-dilutive of 2.7 million, 4.4 million and 4.0 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and (ii) shares of our Class A common stock that are contingently issuable based upon meeting a company-specific goal by March 31, 2015 pursuant to a performance-basedour performance based stock incentive plan, (“Restricted Performance Units”) is contingent upon meeting a certain company goal which iswas not yet probable of being achieved. As a consequence,achieved as of December 31, 2013 of 0.7 million, 0.7 million and 0.7 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.are also not includedtable presents basic and diluted EPS amounts for all periods and the corresponding weighted-average shares outstanding used in the diluted EPS calculation.calculations. For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 (In thousands, except
per share amounts) $ 2,525 $ 211,048 $ 3,639 89,405 87,150 86,223 1,547 809 866 90,952 87,959 87,089 $ 0.03 $ 2.42 $ 0.04 $ 0.03 $ 2.40 $ 0.04
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued4.MarketableNote 5. Investment Securities Restricted Cash and Other Investment Securitiesinvestment securities consistinvestments consisted of the following: As of December 31, 2013 2012 (In thousands) $ 833,791 $ 654,096 34,705 66,145 33,613 56,288 84,424 39,422 986,533 815,951 7,965 7,529 994,498 823,480 8,172 21,516 25,977 27,711 143,794 155,500 169,771 183,211 $ 1,172,441 $ 1,028,207 “Restricted"Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” onsecurities" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.OurOur marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale.(“VRDNs”("VRDNs") municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised of investments in many municipalities and corporations, which are backed by financial institutions or other highly rated companies that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows VRDNs to be liquidated generally on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis.Strategic
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONcurrent strategic marketable investment securitiesportfolio consists of investments in shares of common stock of public companies, which are highly speculative and have experienced and continue to experience volatility. As of December 31, 2011, a significant portionThe value of our strategic investment portfolio consisted of securities of several issuers and a significant portion of the value of that portfolio depends on the value of those issuers.OtherOOtherurcorporate and government bonds.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued20112013 and 2010,2012, our restricted marketable investment securities, together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit or surety bonds.Marketable and Other Investment Securities - NoncurrentWe account for our unconsolidated debt and equity investments under the fair value, equity and/or cost method of accounting. We have several strategic investments in certain equity securities that are included in noncurrent “Marketable and other investment securities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.Cost and EquityNon-majority owned investments in equity securities are generally accounted for using either the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee. However, when we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee,or the cost method is used.companies’companies' businesses and their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans. Because private markets are not as liquid as public markets, there is also increased risk that we will not be able to sell these investments, or that when we desire to sell them we will not be able to obtain fair value for them.Fair Value
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONWe elect the fair value method for certain debt and equity investments in affiliates when we believe the fair value method of accounting provides more meaningful information to our investors. For our investments carried at fair value, interest and dividends are measured at fair value and are recorded in “Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). See “Investments in TerreStar” below for more information.As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had accumulated net unrealized gains, net of related tax effect, of $180 million and $188 million, respectively, as a part of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholders’ equity (deficit).” A full valuation allowance has been established against any net deferred tax assets that are capital in nature. The components of our available-for-sale investments are summarized in the table below.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued Unrealized Amortized
Cost Estimated
Fair Value Gains Losses (In thousands) $ 833,888 $ 227 $ (324 ) $ 833,791 34,705 — — 34,705 92,876 14 (501 ) 92,389 15,272 18,341 — 33,613 $ 976,741 $ 18,582 $ (825 ) $ 994,498 $ 653,812 $ 591 $ (307 ) $ 654,096 66,145 — — 66,145 46,946 5 — 46,951 21,214 35,074 — 56,288 $ 788,117 $ 35,670 $ (307 ) $ 823,480 2011,2013, restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities included debt securities of $777$885.1 million with contractual maturities of one year or less and $93$75.8 million with contractual maturities greater than one year. Actual maturitiesWe may differrealize proceeds from certain investments prior to their contractual maturitiesmaturity as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to their contractual maturity. debt securities have been in an unrealized loss position. We do not intend to sell our investments in debtthese securities before they recover or mature, and it is more likely than not that we will hold these debt investmentssecurities until that time.they recover or mature. In addition, we are not aware of any specific factors indicating that the underlying issuers of these debt securities would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due or repay the principal at maturity. Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair values of these marketable investment securities are primarily related to temporary market fluctuations.
Loss
LossFair Value MeasurementsWe determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:·Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets;·Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and·Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.F-18 As of December 31, 2013 2012 Fair
Value Unrealized
Losses Fair
Value Unrealized
Losses (In thousands) $ 571,592 $ (825 ) $ 275,587 $ (288 ) — — 12,963 (19 ) $ 571,592 $ (825 ) $ 288,550 $ (307 )
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continuedassetscurrent marketable investment securities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:Changes in Level 3 instruments are as follows:
Investment
SecuritiesUnrealized and Realized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities and Other Investments“Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) includes changessummarized in the carrying amount of our investments as follows:ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - ContinuedInvestments in TerreStarWe accounted for our investments in TerreStar Corporation and TerreStar Networks Inc. (“TerreStar Networks”), an indirect, majority-owned subsidiary of TerreStar Corporation, using the fair value method of accounting, which we believe provides more meaningful information to our investors. TerreStar Networks is the principal operating subsidiary of TerreStar Corporation. TerreStar Networks and certain of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on October 19, 2010. TerreStar Corporation and its subsidiary, TerreStar Holdings Inc. (together, the “TSC Debtors”), filed for Chapter 11 protection on February 16, 2011.In February 2008, we completed several transactions under a Master Investment Agreement between us, TerreStar Corporation and TerreStar Networks. Under the Master Investment Agreement, we acquired $50 million in aggregate principal amount of TerreStar Networks’ 6 1/2% Senior Exchangeable Paid-in-Kind Notes due June 15, 2014 (“Exchangeable Notes”) as well as $50 million aggregate principal amount of TerreStar Networks’ 15% Senior Secured Paid-in-Kind Notes due February 15, 2014 (“15% PIK Notes”). The Master Investment Agreement also provides that we have the right to appoint two representatives to TerreStar Corporation’s Board of Directors. We do not presently have any representatives on TerreStar Corporation’s Board of Directors. We have, from time to time, acquired, and we currently hold, other securities issued by TerreStar Corporation and TerreStar Networks.In February 2008, we also entered into a Spectrum Agreement with TerreStar Corporation, under which, in June 2008, TerreStar Corporation completed the acquisition of our holdings of 1.4 GHz spectrum in exchange for the issuance of 30 million shares of its common stock to us.We also entered into an agreement with TerreStar Networks and Harbinger Capital Partners Master Fund I, Ltd. and Harbinger Capital Partners Special Situations Fund LP (collectively, “Harbinger”), in February 2008, in which we and Harbinger each committed to provide up to $50 million in secured financing, the proceeds of which were advanced to TerreStar Networks from time to time as required for TerreStar Networks to make required payments in connection with a communications satellite to be constructed and launched for TerreStar Networks (“Line of Credit”). TerreStar Networks repaid these obligations, in full, through two payments made in August 2011 and October 2011, respectively.In connection with the filings by TerreStar Networks and its subsidiaries (the “Debtors”) for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and an ancillary proceeding under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act in Canada, on October 19, 2010, we entered into a commitment to provide a debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) to the Debtors. On November 18, 2010, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) approved the Credit Facility on a final basis and authorized the Debtors to enter into the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility consists of a non-revolving, multiple draw term loan in the aggregate principal amount of $90 million, with drawings subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Facility. TerreStar Networks repaid this obligation, in full, in August 2011.On June 14, 2011, Gamma Acquisition L.L.C. (“Gamma”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “TerreStar Purchase Agreement”) with TerreStar Networks and certain of its subsidiaries pursuant to which upon closing of the transaction Gamma will acquire substantially all of the assets of TerreStar Networks and its subsidiaries for a cash purchase price of $1.375 billion and will agree to assume certain liabilities associated with the ongoing operations of the business being acquired. On August 11, 2011, Gamma paid $1.345 billion of the purchase price after receipt of approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and prior to the receipt of approvals from the FCC or Canadian federal Department of Industry. On February 7, 2012, the Canadian federal Department of Industry approved the transfer of the Canadian spectrum licenses held by TerreStar to DISH Network. A portion of these proceeds have been used to repay certain of our investments in TerreStar in full, and others in part.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued2011,2013 and 2012, we did not have investments that were categorized within Level 3 of the 15% PIK Notes, Line of Credit and Credit Facility had each been repaid in full. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2011, the Exchangeable Notes are our only remaining investment in TerreStar Networks. We could receive additional funds on account of our Exchangeable Notes when TerreStar Networks’ plan of reorganization (the “TerreStar Networks Plan”) becomes effective and distributions to general unsecured creditors are made. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed TerreStar Networks Plan on February 14, 2012.Our debt investments in TerreStar Networks had an estimated fair value of zero and $626 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31,hierarchy. As of December 31, 2013 2012 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 (In thousands) $ 548,714 $ 49,338 $ 499,376 $ 533,943 $ 23,621 $ 510,322 $ 833,791 $ — $ 833,791 $ 654,096 $ — $ 654,096 34,705 — 34,705 66,145 — 66,145 92,389 — 92,389 46,951 — 46,951 33,613 33,613 — 56,288 56,288 — $ 994,498 $ 33,613 $ 960,885 $ 823,480 $ 56,288 $ 767,192 no longer held any equity investmentdisposed of investments that were accounted for using the fair-value method and we reported net gains of $15.9 million in TerreStar Corporation. As of December 31, 2010, our equity investments in TerreStar Corporation had a fair value of $4 million. Fluctuations in fair value of these investments are recorded in “Unrealized gains (losses)"Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and directly impact our profitability. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded a $16 million net gain, a $144 million gain and a $313 million gain on these investments, respectively.Our remaining investments in TerreStar Networks were highly speculative and have experienced volatility associated with their fair values. The value of our investments in TerreStar Networks was determined using Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy. In estimating those fair values we consider quotes from brokers and other pricing services, if available, and obtain both observable and unobservable inputs in our valuation models which include the use of option pricing and discounted cash flow techniques or a liquidation based method. The fair value of these investments can be significantly impacted by adverse changes in securities markets generally, as well as risks related to the performance of TerreStar Corporation and TerreStar Networks, their ability to obtain sufficient capital to execute their business plans, risks associated with their specific industries, bankruptcy and other factors.On January 14, 2011, TerreStar Corporation filed a Form 15, terminating the registration of its common stock and Series A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and suspending its obligations to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (other than with respect to its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010).5. InventoryInventory consists of the following:The increase in our inventory balance from December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2011 is primarily related to the Hughes Acquisition. See Note 13 for further discussion.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued6. Property and EquipmentProperty and equipment consist of the following:The increase in our property and equipment, net balance from December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2011 is primarily related to the Hughes Acquisition. See Note 13 for further discussion.“Construction in process” consists of the following:During the year ended December 31, 2011, $43 million of interest was capitalized into construction in progress. During the year ended December 31, 2010, $26 million of interest was capitalized into construction in progress, including $7 million which relates to interest expense that should have been capitalized in 2009.ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - ContinuedDepreciation and amortization expense consists of the following:The increase in our depreciation and amortization expense from December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2011 is primarily related to the Hughes Acquisition. See Note 13 for further discussion.Cost of sales and other expense categories includednet" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) dofor the year ended December 31, 2011. In 2013 and 2012, we did not includehave any investments that were accounted for using the fair value method. As of December 31, 2013 2012 (In thousands) $ 164,900 $ 188,463 7,629 39,804 172,529 228,267 (13,237 ) (16,894 ) 355,135 281,845 $ 514,427 $ 493,218
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION As of December 31, 2013 2012 (In thousands) $ 50,357 $ 57,540 8,658 19,041 7,069 7,767 $ 66,084 $ 84,348 As of December 31, Depreciable
Life
(In Years) 2013 2012 (In thousands) — $ 42,850 $ 42,312 3-40 377,208 363,338 1-12 1,157,325 1,064,071 2-4 374,688 251,708 1.5-15 1,949,040 1,762,264 10-15 935,104 935,104 — 210,051 455,186 5,046,266 4,873,983 (2,499,889 ) (2,261,699 ) $ 2,546,377 $ 2,612,284
ECHOSTAR CORPORATIONexpense.included accumulated depreciation of satellites acquired under capital leases of $421.8 million and $362.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, Segment 2013 2012 (In thousands) Other $ 122,070 $ 9,325 Other 16,433 — ESS — 345,090 ETC/ESS 24,160 25,710 ETC/Hughes 20,793 37,264 ETC/Hughes/ESS 26,595 37,797 $ 210,051 $ 455,186 For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ 180,517 $ 150,034 $ 112,182 126,625 121,919 116,397 98,076 80,709 40,877 13,449 12,929 9,416 $ 418,667 $ 365,591 $ 278,872 We currently utilize 11As of December 31, 2013, we utilized 12 of our owned and leased satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator, including the SPACEWAYTM 3 satellite, which was added to our satellite fleet as a result of the Hughes Acquisition. Five of these satellites are leased, and fourequator. Four of our leased satellites are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the terms of the satellite service agreements. We also lease capacity on one satellite from DISH Network that is accounted for as an operating lease. We
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION Segment Launch
Date Nominal Degree
Orbital Location
(West Longitude) Depreciable
Life
(In Years) Hughes August 2007 95 12 Hughes July 2012 107 15 ESS October 1997 61.5 12 ESS July 2000 96.2 12 ESS August 2002 77 12 ESS August 2003 121 12 ESS July 2003 61.5 1.5 ESS November 2012 61.5 15
ESS January 2005 105 10 ESS February 2005 85 10 ESS October 2009 72.7 15 ESS November 2011 77 10 1719 for further discussion of our Related Party Transactionstransactions with DISH Network.leases.Original usefulF-23EchoStar VI and VIII. DISH Network leases satellite capacity from us on certain of our satellites. The leases for the EchoStar VI and VIII satellites expired in accordance with their terms in the first quarter of 2013. EchoStar VI was fully depreciated in August 2012. In May 2013, DISH Network began leasing capacity from us on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare. Effective March 1, 2014, this lease will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
EchoStar XVI. In November 2012, we launched the EchoStar XVI satellite, a direct broadcast satellite ("DBS"). EchoStar XVI is leased to DISH Network for the delivery of direct-to-home ("DTH") broadcast services to DISH Network customers in the United States. We began leasing capacity on EchoStar XVI to DISH Network in January 2013.
EchoStar XIX.Recent Developments In March 2013, we entered into a contract for the design and construction of the EchoStar XIX satellite, which is expected to be launched in mid-2016. EchoStar XIX is our next-generation, high throughput geostationary satellite that will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for our broadband services to the consumer market in North America in our Hughes segment.
TerreStar-2. In August 2013, we and DISH Network entered into a development agreement ("T2 Development Agreement") with respect to the TerreStar-2 ("T2") satellite under which we reimburse DISH Network for amounts it pays to Space Systems/Loral, LLC ("SS/L") in connection with the construction of the T2 satellite. As amended in December 2013, the T2 Development Agreement provides for the ability to purchase DISH Network's rights and obligations under the T2 satellite construction agreements with SS/L. The T2 satellite is designed to provide mobile satellite services using S-band frequencies and we may use this satellite in conjunction with our recently acquired S-band spectrum in Europe.
EchoStar XV. In May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity from DISH Network on EchoStar XV as an operating lease and relocated the satellite to the 45 degree west longitude orbital location for testing pursuant to our Brazilian Authorization. Effective March 1, 2014, this lease will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.
QuetzSat-1.During In 2008, we entered into a ten-year satellitetransponder service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”) to lease all of the capacity on QuetzSat-1. This lease is accounted for asConcurrently, in 2008, we entered into a capital lease.transponder service agreement with DISH Network, haspursuant to which, DISH Network agreed to lease 24 of the 32 direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”)DBS transponders on this satellite from usQuetzSat-1 when QuetzSat-1it is placed into commercial operation at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. This satelliteIn January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter 2011 at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location while we and DISH Network explore alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite. In the interim, we are providing DISH Network with alternate capacity atmoved to the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. Welocation and commenced payments undercommercial operations in February 2013. See Note 19 in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of this report for further discussion of our agreement with SES upon the placement of the QuetzSat-1 satellite at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location.DISH Network relating to QuetzSat-1.
Satellite Anomalies
Prior to 2011, certainCertain of our satellites in our fleet have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant adverse impact on their remaining useful lifelives and/or commercial operation.operations. There can be no assurance that future anomalies will not further impact the remaining useful life and commercial operation of any of these satellites. See “Long-Lived Satellite Assets” below for further discussion of evaluation of impairment.the satellites in our fleet. In addition, there can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. We generally do not carry in-orbit insurance on any of our satellites, other than SPACEWAY 3, andsatellites; therefore, we willgenerally bear the risk of any uninsured in-orbit failures. However, pursuantPursuant to the terms of the agreements governing certain portions of our indebtedness, we are required, subject to certain limitations on coverage, to obtainmaintain launch and in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, formerly known as Jupiter, andSPACEWAY 3, EchoStar XVI, and to maintain in-orbit insurance for EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, EchoStar XVI and SPACEWAY 3. SatelliteXVII. The recent satellite anomalies with respect tothat have affected certain of our satellites are discussed below.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Owned Satellites
EchoStar III. EchoStar III was originally designed to operate a maximum of 32 DBS transponders in a mode that provides service to the entire continental United States ("CONUS"). As a result of the failure of traveling wave tube amplifiers ("TWTAs") in previous years, including the most recent failures in February 2013 and April 2013, only six transponders are currently available for use. It is likely that additional TWTA failures will occur from time to time in the future and such failures could further impact commercial operation of the satellite. EchoStar III was fully depreciated in 2009 and is currently used as an in-orbit spare.
EchoStar IV.VI. During 2011, EchoStar IVVI was removed fromdesigned to operate 32 DBS transponders with a minimum 12-year useful life. Prior to 2012, EchoStar VI experienced solar array anomalies and the 77 degree west longitude orbital location and retired from commercial service. This retirementloss of TWTAs that did not have a materialreduce its useful life; however, the solar array anomalies impacted the commercial operation of the satellite. EchoStar VI lost (i) two additional TWTAs in March 2012, increasing the total number of TWTAs lost on the satellite to five out of 48 TWTAs and (ii) an additional solar array string during the second quarter of 2012, reducing the total power available for use by the spacecraft. The anomalies in 2012 did not impact on our resultscurrent commercial operation or the estimated useful life of operationsthe satellite. However, there can be no assurance that these anomalies or financial position.any future anomalies will not reduce the satellite's useful life or impact its commercial operation. EchoStar VI was fully depreciated in August 2012.
EchoStar VIIIVIII.. EchoStar VIII was designed to operate 32 DBS transponders in the continental U.S.CONUS at approximately 120 watts per channel, switchable to 16 DBS transponders operating at approximately 240 watts per channel. EchoStar VIII was also designed with spot-beam technology. This satellite has experienced several anomalies priorPrior to and during 2011.2011, EchoStar VIII experienced several anomalies. In January 2011, the satelliteEchoStar VIII experienced an anomaly which temporarily disrupted electrical power to some components, causing an interruption of broadcast service. In addition, it has recently been determined thatservice and causing one of the two on-board computers used to control the satellite failed in connection with the January 2011 anomaly. None of theseto fail. These anomalies hashave not impacted the commercial operation or estimated useful life of the satellite. However, if the remaining on-board computer fails, the commercial operation of the satellite would likely be substantially impactedcease and may result in an impairmenta complete loss of the satellite. There can also be no assurance that these or any future anomalies will not reduce its useful life or impact its commercial operation.
Satellites Under Construction
EchoStar XVI.XII. During November 2009, we entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVI, aXII was designed to operate 13 DBS satellite, which is expected to be launched during the second half of 2012 and will operatetransponders at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. DISH Network has agreed to lease all of the capacity on this satellite from us for a portion of its useful life.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. During June 2009, Hughes Communications entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, a next-generation, high throughput geostationary satellite which will employ a multi-spot beam, bent pipe Ka-band architecture and will provide additional capacity for our broadband internet service to the consumer market in North America. EchoStar XVII/Jupiter will operate at the 107 degree west longitude orbital location and is expected to be launched during the summer of 2012.
Satellite Impairments
AMC-15. AMC-15, a fixed satellite services (“FSS”) satellite, commenced commercial operation during January 2005 and currently operates at the 105 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite is equipped with 24 Ku FSS transponders that operate at approximately 120270 watts per channel in CONUS mode, or 22 spot beams using a combination of 135 and a Ka FSS payload consisting65 watt TWTAs or hybrid CONUS/spot beam mode. We currently operate EchoStar XII in spot beam mode. Prior to 2010, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of 12 spot beams. During 2011, AMC-15electrical power available from its solar arrays. In September 2012, November 2012, and January 2013, EchoStar XII experienced solar-poweradditional solar array anomalies, which caused afurther reduced the electrical power available to operate EchoStar XII. An engineering analysis completed in the second quarter of 2013 indicated further loss that reduced its capacity. Pursuant to the satellite services agreement, we negotiated a reduction of our monthly recurring payment, which impacted the carrying value of the satelliteavailable electrical power and the related capital lease obligation. The monthly recurring payment has been reduced and asresulting capacity loss was likely. As a result, our capital lease obligationwe recognized a $34.7 million impairment loss in the second quarter of 2013. Additional solar array anomalies are likely, and if they occur, they will continue to degrade the corresponding asset value was decreased by a totaloperational capability of $20 million each.EchoStar XII and could lead to additional impairment charges in the future.
Leased Satellites
AMC-16. AMC-16, ana FSS satellite, commenced commercial operation during February 2005 and currently operates at the 85 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite is equipped with2005. AMC-16 was designed to operate 24 Ku-band FSS transponders that operate at approximately 120 watts per channel and a Ka-band payload consisting of 12 spot beams. During 2010,In each of February 2012, April 2012, and November 2012, AMC-16 experienced a solar-power anomaly, which caused additional partial loss of satellite capacity. As a partialresult of prior period depreciation and adjustments associated with satellite anomalies, the net carrying amount of AMC-16 was reduced to zero as of December 31, 2010. Thereafter, subsequent reductions in our capital lease obligation resulting from reductions in our
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
recurring lease payments are recognized as gains in "Other, net" on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Upon determination of related reductions in our monthly recurring payments, we reduced our capital lease obligation for AMC-16 and recognized corresponding gains of $12.6 million in 2012 and $6.7 million in 2013. There can be no assurance that the existing anomalies or any future anomalies will not reduce AMC-16's useful life or further impact its commercial operations.
Satellite Impairments
We evaluate our satellites for impairment and test for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Certain of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the physical condition of a particular satellite. However, based on the redundancy designed within each satellite, certain of these anomalies are not necessarily considered to be significant events that would require a test of recoverability.
EchoStar XII. Prior to 2012, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of electrical power lossavailable from its solar arrays, which reduced the number of transponders that could be operated. In September 2012, November 2012, and January 2013, EchoStar XII experienced additional solar array anomalies, which further reduced its capacity. Pursuant toelectrical power available. Our ongoing engineering analysis, completed in consultation with the satellite servicesmanufacturer, has indicated that further loss of available electrical power and resulting capacity loss is likely. The satellite is currently leased to DISH Network pursuant to an agreement we are entitledthat entitles DISH Network to a reduction of ourin its monthly recurring paymentlease payments in the event of a partial loss of satellite capacity. During 2010,capacity or complete failure of the satellite. In the second quarter of 2013, we determined that the undiscounted cash flows from DISH Network were not likely to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the satellite as a result of expected reductions in the monthly recurring paymentlease payments due to future capacity loss. Consequently, in the second quarter of 2013, we recognized a $34.7 million impairment loss within our EchoStar Satellite Services segment to reduce the carrying amount of the satellite to its estimated fair value of $11.3 million as of June 30, 2013. Our fair value estimate was reduceddetermined using probability weighted discounted cash flow techniques and as a result, our capital lease obligation,is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Our estimate included significant unobservable inputs related to predicted electrical power levels and the corresponding asset value, was decreased by a totalnumber of $39 million. In addition, beginning in May 2011, the monthly recurring payment was further reduced due to the 2010 anomaly and as a result our capital lease obligation was further decreased by approximately $7 million. AMC-16 currently has no net book value (due to prior period impairments) therefore a $7 million gain was recorded in “Other, net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the first quarter 2012, AMC-16 experienced an additional solar-power anomaly, which caused a partial power lossbillable transponders that further reduced its capacity. Testing is being performed to determine the extent to which this anomaly impacted its commercial operations, the extent to which the monthly recurring payment may be further reduced and the extent to which our capital lease obligation may be further decreased. There can be no assurance that this anomaly or any future anomalies will not reduce itssupported by predicted available power. In connection with our impairment analysis, we revised our estimate of the useful life or further impactof the satellite. Effective July 2013, the $11.3 million adjusted carrying amount of EchoStar XII is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its commercial operations.then remaining estimated useful life of 18 months. The carrying amount of EchoStar XII, net of accumulated depreciation, as of December 31, 2013 was $7.5 million.
CMBStar. DuringIn 2008, we suspended construction of the CMBStar satellite and recorded an $85 million impairment. Duringsatellite. In 2011, we performed our annual impairment analysis and determined that the discounted cash flows would not recover the carrying amount of thisthe incomplete satellite resulting in an additional $33was not recoverable and recognized a $33.0 million impairment.impairment to reduce the carrying amount of the satellite to its estimated fair value of $19.2 million. We determinedestimated the fair value of this satellite by evaluating the probable cash flows that we may receive from potential uses including what other purchasers in the market participants may have paid for a reasonably similar asset and the fair valueamount we could realize should we deploy the satellite in a manner different from its original intended use (for example, we considered component resale values).use. The valuation model used Level 3 inputs. We continue to explore alternative uses for this satellite, including potentially reconfiguring the satellite and changing its proposed orbital location in a manner that would be more cost-effective than designing and constructing a new satellite. There can be no assurance that this satellite will not be further impaired in the future.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
Long-Lived SatelliteNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Note 9. Goodwill, Regulatory Authorizations and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
We evaluateThe excess of the cost of an acquired business over the fair values of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets at the time of the acquisition is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is assigned to our satellites forreporting units of our operating segments and is subject to our annual impairment and test for recoverability whenevertesting, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that theirthe fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount.
Changes in the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This evaluation is performed atof our goodwill by reportable segment for the lowest level for which identifiable cash flowsyears ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are largely independentas follows:
| | EchoStar Technologies | Hughes | Consolidated Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 16,820 | $ | 516,198 | $ | 533,018 | ||||
Deferred tax adjustment | — | (12,025 | ) | (12,025 | ) | |||||
Contribution to DISH Digital | (6,457 | ) | — | (6,457 | ) | |||||
Impairment | (6,612 | ) | — | (6,612 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2012 | 3,751 | 504,173 | 507,924 | |||||||
Impairment | (3,751 | ) | — | (3,751 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | — | $ | 504,173 | $ | 504,173 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2013, all of our goodwill was derived from the Hughes Acquisition. During the second quarter of 2013, we applied a qualitative assessment in our annual impairment testing of goodwill assigned to reporting units of the Hughes segment. Based on our assessment as of that date, we determined that no further testing of goodwill for impairment was necessary as it was not more likely than not that the fair values of the Hughes segment reporting units were less than the corresponding carrying amounts.
Prior to 2012, goodwill of $10.4 million was assigned to the Troppus reporting unit of our EchoStar Technologies segment. This goodwill was tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2012, we determined that the goodwill was impaired and recognized a $6.6 million impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount of the goodwill to its implied fair value of $3.8 million. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we determined that the remaining goodwill balance was impaired and recognized a $3.8 million impairment loss to adjust the carrying amount to its implied fair value of zero. Our fair value estimates in 2013 and 2012 were based on updated business plans and the application of probability-weighted discounted cash flowsflow techniques. Our estimates included significant unobservable inputs and are categorized within Level 3 of otherthe fair value hierarchy.
In connection with the formation of DISH Digital in July 2012, we contributed the net assets and liabilities. Certainbusiness of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be consideredMove Networks, Inc., a reporting unit of our EchoStar Technologies segment that we acquired in 2010, to represent a significant adverse changeDISH Digital. Goodwill of $6.5 million assigned to this reporting unit was reclassified to our investment in DISH Digital. See Note 19 for additional information about our investment in the physicalDISH Digital.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
Regulatory Authorizations
conditionRegulatory Authorizations included amounts with finite and indefinite useful lives, as follows:
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
Finite useful lives: | |||||||
Cost | $ | 113,764 | $ | 71,055 | |||
Accumulated amortization | (1,521 | ) | — | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Net | 112,243 | 71,055 | |||||
Indefinite lives | 471,657 | 491,657 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total regulatory authorizations, net | $ | 583,900 | $ | 562,712 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In December 2013, we acquired 100.0% of Solaris Mobile which is based in Dublin, Ireland and licensed by the European Union ("EU") and individual Member States to provide MSS and a particular satellite. However,complementary ground component services covering the entire EU using S-band spectrum. On the acquisition date, Solaris Mobile lacked certain inputs and processes that would be necessary to be considered a business. Accordingly, we accounted for the transaction as an acquisition of net assets. The primary acquired asset was an EU Regulatory Authorization for S-band frequencies, which had a cost of $51.8 million, consisting of $43.4 million in cash payments and $10.3 million in assumed liabilities. The cost of the Regulatory Authorization is being amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining term of the authorization ending in May 2027.
In June 2013 we entered into an agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we conveyed to DISH Network certain of our rights under a Canadian Regulatory Authorization to develop certain spectrum rights at the 103 degree west longitude orbital location, which we acquired in 2012. In the third quarter of 2013, we received $23.1 million from DISH Network in exchange for these rights. In accordance with accounting principles that apply to transfers of assets between companies under common control, we did not recognize any gain on this transaction. Rather, we increased our additional paid-in capital to reflect the excess of the cash payment over the carrying amount of the derecognized intangible asset, net of related income taxes.
In May 2012, we acquired an authorization to use the 45 degree west longitude orbital location in the Ku, Ka, and S-band spectrums from ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory authority (the "Brazil authorization"), for cash of 145.2 million Brazilian reais (approximately $72.5 million based on the redundancy designed within each satellite, these anomalies are not consideredexchange rate at the time of payment). The Brazil authorization has a 15-year initial term and a one-time 15-year renewal term, which we expect to be significant events that would require evaluation for impairment recognition because the projected cash flows have not been significantly affected by these anomalies.
7.Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization consistedrenew. The cost of the following:
|
| As of December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
| Intangible |
| Accumulated |
| Intangible |
| Accumulated |
| ||||
|
| Assets |
| Amortization |
| Assets |
| Amortization |
| ||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Contract-based |
| $ | 255,366 |
| $ | (145,406 | ) | $ | 190,566 |
| $ | (108,361 | ) |
Customer relationships |
| 295,327 |
| (77,560 | ) | 23,632 |
| (23,605 | ) | ||||
Technology-based (1) |
| 153,185 |
| (49,307 | ) | 111,848 |
| (35,086 | ) | ||||
Favorable leases |
| 4,707 |
| (687 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||
Trademark portfolio |
| 32,191 |
| (1,364 | ) | — |
| — |
| ||||
Total |
| $ | 740,776 |
| $ | (274,324 | ) | $ | 326,046 |
| $ | (167,052 | ) |
AmortizationBrazil authorization, together with estimated renewal costs of these intangible assetsapproximately $5.6 million, is recordedbeing amortized on a straight-line basis over an averagethe remaining expected term of 28 years commencing in June 2013, which was when a satellite was deployed in the orbital location for testing pursuant to the Brazil authorization.
Amortization expense for the Regulatory Authorizations with finite useful life primarily ranging from approximately one to twenty years or in relation tolives was $1.5 million for the estimated discounted cash flows over the life of the intangible. Amortizationyear ended December 31, 2013. There was $107 million, $31 million and $33 millionno amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Other Intangible Assets
Our other intangible assets, which are subject to amortization, primarily resulted from our acquisition of Hughes in 2011, 2010consisted of the following:
| | | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
| | Weighted Average Useful life (in Years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Carrying Amount | Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Carrying Amount | |||||||||||||||
| | | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships | 8 | $ | 293,932 | $ | (152,647 | ) | $ | 141,285 | $ | 293,932 | $ | (113,906 | ) | $ | 180,026 | ||||||
Contract-based | 10 | 255,366 | (204,835 | ) | 50,531 | 255,366 | (178,138 | ) | 77,228 | ||||||||||||
Technology-based | 7 | 126,272 | (83,580 | ) | 42,692 | 126,387 | (66,338 | ) | 60,049 | ||||||||||||
Trademark portfolio | 20 | 29,700 | (3,836 | ) | 25,864 | 29,700 | (2,351 | ) | 27,349 | ||||||||||||
Favorable leases | 4 | 4,707 | (3,040 | ) | 1,667 | 4,707 | (1,863 | ) | 2,844 | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other intangible assets | $ | 709,977 | $ | (447,938 | ) | $ | 262,039 | $ | 710,092 | $ | (362,596 | ) | $ | 347,496 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Customer relationships are amortized predominantly in relation to the expected contribution of cash flow to the business over the life of the intangible asset. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the periods the assets are expected to contribute to our cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2009, respectively.2011, intangible asset amortization expense was $88.4 million, $91.7 million and $107.0 million, respectively, including amortization of Regulatory Authorizations with finite lives.
Future Amortization
EstimatedAs of December 31, 2013, our estimated future amortization of our identifiable intangible assets was as follows:
| | Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||
For the Years Ending December 31, | ||||
2014 | $ | 85,921 | ||
2015 | 66,289 | |||
2016 | 47,498 | |||
2017 | 28,541 | |||
2018 | 20,825 | |||
Thereafter | 130,834 | |||
| | | | | |
Total | $ | 379,908 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Impairments of December 31, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):Intangible Assets
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
| |
2012 |
| $ | 90,540 |
|
2013 |
| 68,826 |
| |
2014 |
| 77,414 |
| |
2015 |
| 61,316 |
| |
2016 |
| 41,611 |
| |
Thereafter (1) |
| 126,745 |
| |
Total |
| $ | 466,452 |
|
(1) On December 31, 2010,In connection with the Hughes Acquisition, we acquired certain assetscontractual rights to receive $44.0 million in cash discounts on future launch services ("Credits") and assigned an estimated fair value of Move Networks, Inc. which included in-process research$22.0 million to the Credits on the acquisition date. In November 2012, we entered into an agreement for alternative launch services and development (“R&D”). In-process R&D assets acquired in a business combination initially aredetermined that the potential to realize value from the Credits was less than previously estimated. Based on an updated fair value estimate using unobservable inputs that considered indefinite-lived assets until eitherfactors such as the completion or abandonmentviability of the associated R&D efforts. Upon the successful completionlaunch services provider and marketability of the development process, we will commence amortization of the balance over the estimated useful life of the project. For purposes of the amortization table, we include, among other things, the entire in-process R&D balance of $26 million in the category labeled “Thereafter” until such time that the R&D efforts are finalized or abandoned.Credits,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
we recognized a $22.0 million impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of the Credits to their estimated fair value of zero as of December 31, 2012.
Goodwill
In connection with our annual impairment test of our indefinite-lived intangible assets in the fourth quarter of 2012, we determined that certain terrestrial wireless spectrum assets had nominal value. As a result, we recognized a $4.2 million of impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of the assets to their estimated fair value of zero.
The excessimpairment losses recognized in the fourth quarter of our investments in consolidated subsidiaries over net tangible2012 were based primarily on fair value estimates using probability-weighted discounted cash flow techniques and identifiable intangible assetlimited market data. Our fair value at the timeestimates included significant unobservable inputs and are categorized within Level 3 of the investment is recorded as goodwill and is not subject to amortization but is subject to impairment testing annually or whenever indicators of impairment arise. The goodwill associated with various acquisitions is detailed in the table below.fair value hierarchy.
|
| Goodwill |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
| $ | 6,457 |
|
Troppus Acquisition (non-deductible) |
| 10,363 |
| |
Hughes Acquisition (non-deductible) |
| 516,198 |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
| $ | 533,018 |
|
8.Note 10. Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our debt primarily consisted of our Senior Secured Notes and Senior Notes, as defined below (collectively, the "Notes"), and our capital lease obligations. The Notes are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of our debt:
| | | As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
| | Interest Rates | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||
| | | (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
61/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 | 6.500% | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,193,500 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,210,000 | |||||||
75/8% Senior Notes due 2021 | 7.625% | 900,000 | 1,001,250 | 900,000 | 1,026,450 | |||||||||||
Other | 5.50%-15.75% | 1,588 | 1,588 | 2,041 | 2,041 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal | 2,001,588 | $ | 2,196,338 | 2,002,041 | $ | 2,238,491 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital lease obligations(1) | 420,800 | 486,458 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total debt and capital lease obligations | 2,422,388 | 2,488,499 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Current portion | (69,791 | ) | (67,706 | ) | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term portion of debt and capital lease obligations | $ | 2,352,597 | $ | 2,420,793 | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We estimated the fair value of our publicly traded long-term debt using market prices in less active markets (Level 2).
6 1/2%1/2% Senior Secured Notes due 2019
On June 1, 2011, Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation (“HSS”("HSS"), our wholly-owned subsidiary formerly known as EH Holding Corporation, issued $1.1$1.10 billion aggregate principal amount of its 6 1/2%1/2% Senior Secured Notes (the “Senior"Senior Secured Notes”Notes") at an issue price of 100.0%, pursuant to a Secured Indenture dated June 1, 2011 (the “Secured Indenture”"Secured
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Indenture"). The Senior Secured Notes mature on June 15, 2019. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 6 1/2%1/2% and is payable semi-annually in cash, in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to 100%100.0% of the principal amount thereof plus a “make-whole”"make-whole" premium, as defined in the Secured Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. Prior to June 15, 2014, HSS may also redeem up to 35%35.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes at a redemption price equal to 106.500%106.5% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings or capital contributions. In addition, prior to June 15, 2015, HSS may redeem up to 10%10.0% of the outstanding Senior Secured Notes per year at a redemption price equal to 103%103.0% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
The Senior Secured Notes are:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Subject to certain exceptions, the Secured Indenture contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, impose limitations on the ability of HSS and, in certain instances, the ability of its Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Secured Indenture), to:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the Secured Indenture, HSS would be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holder’sholder's Senior Secured Notes at a purchase price equal to 101%101.0% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date of repurchase.
As discussed above, HSS and certain of its subsidiaries have granted a first priority security interest in substantially all of their assets, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, in connection with HSS’HSS' issuance of $1.1$1.10 billion aggregate principal amount of its Senior Secured Notes.
7 5/8%5/8% Senior Notes due 2021
On June 1, 2011, HSS issued $900$900.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7 5/8%5/8% Senior Notes (the “Senior Notes”"Senior Notes") at an issue price of 100.0%, pursuant to an Unsecured Indenture dated June 1, 2011 (the “Unsecured Indenture”"Unsecured Indenture"). The Senior Notes mature on June 15, 2021. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 7 5/8%5/8% and is payable semi-annually in cash, in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to 100.0% of the principal amount plus a “make-whole”"make-whole" premium, as defined in the Unsecured Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. Prior to June 15, 2014, HSS may also redeem up to 35%35.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 107.625% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption, with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings or capital contributions.
The Senior Notes are:
·
·
·
·
·
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Subject to certain exceptions, the Unsecured Indenture contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, impose limitations on the ability of HSS and, in certain instances, the ability of its Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Unsecured Indenture), to:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
·
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the Unsecured Indenture, HSS would be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holder’sholder's Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101%101.0% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date of repurchase.
Debt Issuance Costs
Exchange Offer
We offered to exchange our Senior Secured Notes and our Senior Notes (collectivelyIn connection with the “Notes”) for substantially identical debt securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933. This offer to exchange expired February 27, 2012 with 100%issuance of the Notes, being tendered for exchange.
Interest onwe incurred $58.1 million of debt issuance costs, which are included in "Other noncurrent assets, net" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the Notes
|
|
|
| Annual |
| |
|
| Semi-Annual |
| Debt Service |
| |
|
| Payment Dates |
| Requirements |
| |
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Senior Secured Notes |
| June 15 and December 15 |
| $ | 71,500 |
|
Senior Notes |
| June 15 and December 15 |
| $ | 68,625 |
|
Our ability to meet our debt service requirements on the Notes will depend on, among other factors, the successful execution of our business strategy, which is subject to uncertainties and contingencies beyond our control.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Fair Value of our Debt
The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of our debt facilities:
|
| As of December 31, |
| ||||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||||||||
|
| Carrying |
|
|
| Carrying |
|
|
| ||||
|
| Value |
| Fair Value |
| Value |
| Fair Value |
| ||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes |
| $ | 1,100,000 |
| $ | 1,138,500 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Senior Notes |
| 900,000 |
| 936,000 |
| — |
| — |
| ||||
Mortgages and other notes payable |
| 6,644 |
| 6,644 |
| 6,535 |
| 6,535 |
| ||||
Subtotal |
| 2,006,644 |
| $ | 2,081,144 |
| 6,535 |
| $ | 6,535 |
| ||
Capital lease obligations (1) |
| 527,618 |
| NA |
| 406,350 |
| NA |
| ||||
Total debt and capital lease obligations |
| $ | 2,534,262 |
|
|
| $ | 412,885 |
|
|
| ||
(1) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.
Other Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Other debt and capital lease obligations consist of the following:
|
| As of December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
Capital lease obligations: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Satellites financed under capital lease obligations |
| $ | 524,325 |
| $ | 405,449 |
|
Other equipment financed under capital lease obligations |
| 3,293 |
| 901 |
| ||
8% note payable for EchoStar IX satellite vendor financing, payable over 14 years from launch |
| 5,608 |
| 6,315 |
| ||
Other notes payable |
| 1,036 |
| 220 |
| ||
Total |
| 534,262 |
| 412,885 |
| ||
Less current portion |
| (65,239 | ) | (53,060 | ) | ||
Capital lease obligations, mortgages and other notes payable, net of current portion |
| $ | 469,023 |
| $ | 359,825 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations
As ofyears ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, we had $907amortized $5.4 million, $5.0 million and $535$2.8 million capitalized for the estimated fair value of satellites accounted for as capital leasesdebt issuance costs, respectively, which are included in “Property and equipment,"Interest expense, net” with related accumulated depreciation of $302 million and $268 million, respectively. Inamounts capitalized" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), we recognized $34 million, $28 million and $21 million in depreciation expense on satellites acquired under.
Capital Lease Obligations
Our capital lease obligations reflect the present value of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable lease agreements, duringprimarily for certain of our satellites (see Note 8). These agreements require monthly recurring payments, which include principal, interest, an amount for use of the years endedorbital location and estimated executory costs, such as insurance and maintenance. The monthly recurring payments generally are subject to reduction in the event of failures that reduce the satellite transponder capacity. Certain of these agreements provide for extension of the initial lease term at our option. The effective interest rates for our satellite capital lease obligations range from 7.78% to 10.97%, with a weighted average of 9.87% as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
2013. As discussed in Note 19, we have subleased transponders on certain of our leased satellites to DISH Network.
The following satellites are accounted for as capital leases and depreciated over the terms of the respective satellite service agreements on a straight-line basis.
AMC-15.AMC-15 commenced commercial operation during January 2005. This lease is renewable by us on a year-to-year basis following the initial ten-year term, and provides us with certain rights to lease capacity on replacement satellites. During 2011, AMC-15 experienced solar-power anomalies, which caused a power loss that reduced its capacity. Pursuant to the satellite services agreement, we negotiated a reduction of our monthly recurring payment, which impacted the carrying value of the satellite and the related capital lease obligation. The monthly
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
recurring payment has been reduced and as a result our capital lease obligation and the corresponding asset value was decreased by a total of $20 million each.
AMC-16. AMC-16 commenced commercial operation during February 2005. This lease is renewable by us on a year-to-year basis following the initial ten-year term, and provides us with certain rights to lease capacity on replacement satellites. Effective in 2010, the monthly recurring payment was reduced and as a result, our capital lease obligation, and the corresponding asset value, was decreased by a total of $39 million. In addition, beginning in May 2011, the monthly recurring payment was further reduced due to the 2010 anomaly and as a result, our capital lease obligation was further decreased by approximately $7 million. AMC-16 currently has no net book value (due to prior period impairments) therefore a $7 million gain was recorded in “Other, net” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the first quarter 2012, AMC-16 experienced an additional solar-power anomaly, which caused a partial power loss that further reduced its capacity. Testing is being performed to determine the extent to which this anomaly impacted its commercial operations, the extent to which the monthly recurring payment may be further reduced and the extent to which our capital lease obligation may be further decreased. There can be no assurance that this anomaly or any future anomalies will not reduce its useful life or further impact its commercial operations.
Nimiq 55.. Nimiq 5 was launched in September 2009 and commenced commercial operation at the 72.7 degree west longitude orbital location duringin October 2009, where it provides additional high-powered capacity to our satellite fleet. See Note 17 for further discussion.The lease is renewable by us on a month-to-month basis following the initial 15-year term.
QuetzSat-1.During In 2008, we entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. ("SES Latin America") to lease all of the capacity on QuetzSat-1. This lease is accounted for as a capital lease. DISH Network has agreed to lease 24 of the 32 DBS transponders on this satellite from us when QuetzSat-1 is placed into commercial operation at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. This satellite was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2011 at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location while we and DISH Network explore alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite. In the interim, we are providing DISH Network with alternate capacity at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. We commenced payments under our agreement with SES Latin America upon the placement of the QuetzSat-1 satellite at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
location. In 2008, we also entered into an agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network has agreed to lease certain of the DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1 from us when it was placed into commercial operation at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location, which occurred in January 2013. See Note 1719 for further discussion.
discussion on our agreement with DISH Network relating to QuetzSat-1.
Future minimum lease payments under these capital lease obligations, together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2011,2013, are as follows:
|
| Amount |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
| |
2012 |
| $ | 146,859 |
|
2013 |
| 145,075 |
| |
2014 |
| 140,873 |
| |
2015 |
| 82,402 |
| |
2016 |
| 81,774 |
| |
Thereafter |
| 556,257 |
| |
Total minimum lease payments |
| 1,153,240 |
| |
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments |
| (319,751 | ) | |
Net minimum lease payments |
| 833,489 |
| |
Less: Amount representing interest |
| (305,871 | ) | |
Present value of net minimum lease payments |
| 527,618 |
| |
Less: Current portion |
| (64,068 | ) | |
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
| $ | 463,550 |
|
| | Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||
For the Years Ending December 31, | ||||
2014 | $ | 144,020 | ||
2015 | 90,022 | |||
2016 | 87,965 | |||
2017 | 87,965 | |||
2018 | 87,807 | |||
Thereafter | 433,583 | |||
| | | | | |
Total minimum lease payments | 931,362 | |||
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments | (276,007 | ) | ||
| | | | | |
Net minimum lease payments | 655,355 | |||
Less: Amount representing interest | (234,555 | ) | ||
| | | | | |
Present value of net minimum lease payments | 420,800 | |||
Less: Current portion | (68,360 | ) | ||
| | | | | |
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations | $ | 352,440 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The summaryFor the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we received sublease rental income of future maturities of our outstanding debt asapproximately $126.7 million, $78.9 million and $62.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011 is included in the commitments table2013, our future minimum sublease rental income was $875.9 million relating to our satellites. See "Nimiq 5 Agreement" and "QuetzSat-1 Agreement" in Note 14.
19 for further discussion on our lease agreements with DISH Network.
F-31Note 11. Income Taxes
The components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows:
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Domestic | $ | (50,551 | ) | $ | 172,612 | $ | 290 | |||
Foreign | 16,515 | 22,072 | 25,485 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (34,036 | ) | $ | 194,684 | $ | 25,775 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
9.Income Taxes
Our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as well as probable operating loss, tax credit and other carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized. We periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance. Determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events, including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities. Our deferred tax assets included tax effected net operating losses (“NOLs”) and credits of $125 million as of December 31, 2011 which has been partially offset by a valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2011, we had capital loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $13 million, which has been offset by a valuation allowance.
As of December 31, 2011, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $291 million which begin to expire in 2019. In addition, we had capital loss carryforwards of approximately $33 million which are fully offset by a valuation allowance.
The components of pretax income (loss) are as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
|
|
| (In thousands) |
|
|
| |||
Domestic |
| $ | 290 |
| $ | 284,501 |
| $ | 425,793 |
|
Foreign |
| 25,485 |
| 4,272 |
| (434 | ) | |||
Total |
| $ | 25,775 |
| $ | 288,773 |
| $ | 425,359 |
|
The components of the (provision for) benefit from(provision) for income taxes are as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Current (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
| $ | (26,450 | ) | $ | 21,542 |
| $ | (9,240 | ) |
State |
| (291 | ) | (579 | ) | (5,216 | ) | |||
Foreign |
| (3,734 | ) | (1,809 | ) | (855 | ) | |||
|
| (30,475 | ) | 19,154 |
| (15,311 | ) | |||
Deferred (provision) benefit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Federal |
| (464 | ) | (96,976 | ) | (29,182 | ) | |||
State |
| 9,438 |
| (6,593 | ) | (16,162 | ) | |||
|
| 8,974 |
| (103,569 | ) | (45,344 | ) | |||
Total benefit (provision) |
| $ | (21,501 | ) | $ | (84,415 | ) | $ | (60,655 | ) |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Current benefit (provision): | ||||||||||
Federal | $ | 1,118 | $ | 21,086 | $ | (26,450 | ) | |||
State | 6,531 | 1,943 | (291 | ) | ||||||
Foreign | (5,992 | ) | (7,775 | ) | (3,734 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total current benefit (provision) | 1,657 | 15,254 | (30,475 | ) | ||||||
Deferred benefit (provision): | ||||||||||
Federal | 26,511 | 7,841 | (464 | ) | ||||||
State | 10,074 | (6,720 | ) | 9,438 | ||||||
Foreign | (805 | ) | (46 | ) | — | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total deferred benefit (provision) | 35,780 | 1,075 | 8,974 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total income tax benefit (provision), net | $ | 37,437 | $ | 16,329 | $ | (21,501 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The actual tax provisions for 2011, 2010the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 20092011 reconcile to the amounts computed by applying the statutory Federalfederal tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes as shown below:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
|
|
| % of pre-tax (income)/loss |
| ||||
Statutory rate |
| (35.0 | ) | (35.0 | ) | (35.0 | ) |
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit |
| 4.8 |
| (1.9 | ) | (4.4 | ) |
Stock option compensation |
| — |
| 0.1 |
| (0.4 | ) |
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance |
| (50.4 | ) | 2.0 |
| 24.7 |
|
Stock write-off |
| — |
| 2.0 |
| — |
|
Other |
| (2.8 | ) | 3.6 |
| 0.8 |
|
Total benefit (provision) for income taxes |
| (83.4 | ) | (29.2 | ) | (14.3 | ) |
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Statutory rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
State income taxes, net of Federal benefit | 21.0 | % | 0.8 | % | (4.8 | )% | ||||
Dividend received deduction | — | (1.8 | )% | — | ||||||
Permanent differences | (10.7 | )% | 1.1 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||
Tax credits | 48.7 | % | (5.0 | )% | (12.5 | )% | ||||
Valuation allowance | 14.2 | % | (39.0 | )% | 50.5 | % | ||||
Other | 1.8 | % | 0.5 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total effective tax rate | 110.0 | % | (8.4 | )% | 83.4 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
The temporary differences, which give rise tocomponents of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:
|
| As of December 31, |
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
NOL, credit and other carryforwards |
| $ | 122,733 |
| $ | 23,062 |
|
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments |
| 91,884 |
| 15,243 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
| 15,251 |
| 12,042 |
| ||
Stock-based compensation |
| 14,318 |
| 8,998 |
| ||
Total deferred tax assets |
| 244,186 |
| 59,345 |
| ||
Valuation allowance |
| (35,677 | ) | (46,670 | ) | ||
Deferred tax asset after valuation allowance |
| 208,509 |
| 12,675 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments |
| (83,873 | ) | (61,797 | ) | ||
Depreciation, amortization and intangible assets |
| (455,255 | ) | (88,996 | ) | ||
State taxes net of federal effect |
| (19,280 | ) | (1,843 | ) | ||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
| (558,408 | ) | (152,636 | ) | ||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
| $ | (349,899 | ) | $ | (139,961 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current portion of net deferred tax asset (liability) |
| $ | 23,492 |
| $ | (64,121 | ) |
Noncurrent portion of net deferred tax asset (liability) |
| (373,391 | ) | (75,840 | ) | ||
Total net deferred tax asset (liability) |
| $ | (349,899 | ) | $ | (139,961 | ) |
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||
Net operating losses, credit and other carryforwards | $ | 419,646 | $ | 461,931 | |||
Unrealized losses on investments, net | 31,067 | 14,757 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 33,215 | 26,438 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 8,117 | 14,942 | |||||
Other asset | 12,247 | 2,848 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax assets | 504,292 | 520,916 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (79,370 | ) | (69,224 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets after valuation allowance | 424,922 | 451,692 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | (841,407 | ) | (798,878 | ) | |||
Other liabilities | (755 | ) | (1,454 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total deferred tax liabilities | (842,162 | ) | (800,332 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total net deferred tax liabilities | $ | (417,240 | ) | $ | (348,640 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Current portion of net deferred tax assets | $ | 69,633 | $ | 23,317 | |||
Noncurrent portion of net deferred tax liabilities | (486,873 | ) | (371,957 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total net deferred tax liabilities | $ | (417,240 | ) | $ | (348,640 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the effects of tax losses, credits, and the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
We evaluate our deferred tax assets for realization and record a valuation allowance when we determine that it is more likely than not that the amounts will not be realized. Overall, our net deferred tax assets arewere offset by a valuation allowance of $36$79.4 million and $47$69.2 million as of December 31, 20112013 and 2010, respectively, principally related to losses that are capital in nature.2012, respectively. The decreasechange in the valuation allowance primarily relates to an increase in realized and unrealized gainslosses that are capital in nature and an increase in the net operating loss carryforwards of certain foreign subsidiaries.
Tax benefits of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are evaluated on marketable investment securitiesan ongoing basis, including a review of historical and projected future operating results, the eligible carryforward period, and other investments. Approximately $3 million of the change in valuation allowance is accountedcircumstances. Net operating loss carryforwards for in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2011. We evaluated and assessed the expected near-term utilization of NOLs, book and taxable income trends, available tax strategies and the overall deferred tax position to determine the valuation allowance requiredpurposes were $1.02 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.2013. A substantial portion of these net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2020. Capital loss carryforwards for tax purposes were $45.3 million as of December 31, 2013. A substantial portion of these capital loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2015. Currently, we have a valuation allowance against all capital loss carryforwards that exist for tax purposes. Tax credits available to offset future tax liabilities are $26.2 million as of December 31, 2013. A substantial portion of these tax credits will begin to expire in 2026.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Additionally, tax benefit from excess tax deductions attributable to stock-based compensation has resulted in $5.9 million of net operating loss carryforwards that will not be recognized as a credit to additional paid in capital until such deductions reduce taxes payable. We follow the tax law ordering rules, which assume that stock option deductions are realized when they have been used for tax purposes.
As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had undistributed earnings attributable to foreign subsidiaries for which no provision for U.S. income taxes or foreign withholding taxes has been made because it is expected that such earnings will be reinvested outside the U.S. indefinitely.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
It is not practicable to determine the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability at this time.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
In addition to filing U.S. federal income tax returns, we and one or more of our subsidiaries will file income tax returns in all states that impose an income tax. As of December 31, 2013, we are currently under a U.S. federal income tax examination for fiscal year 2009 and 2010. We also file income tax returns in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Spain, Brazil, India Germany and a number of other foreign jurisdictions where we have insignificant operations. We generally are generally open to income tax examination in these foreign jurisdictions by tax authorities in taxable years beginning in 2003. As of December 31, 2011,2013, we are currently under a federal income tax examination for fiscal year 2008. We have no on-going significant current income tax examinations in process in our foreign jurisdictions.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized income tax benefits is as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Unrecognized tax benefit |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Balance as of beginning of period |
| $ | 29,999 |
| $ | 14,559 |
| $ | 15,181 |
|
Additions from Hughes Acquisition |
| 3,119 |
| — |
| — |
| |||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
| — |
| — |
| 155 |
| |||
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years |
| 16,630 |
| 15,440 |
| — |
| |||
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years |
| (874 | ) | — |
| (777 | ) | |||
Balance as of end of period |
| $ | 48,874 |
| $ | 29,999 |
| $ | 14,559 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unrecognized tax benefit | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Balance as of beginning of period | $ | 34,677 | $ | 48,874 | $ | 29,999 | ||||
Additions from Hughes Acquisition | — | — | 3,119 | |||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 81 | 158 | — | |||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years | 9,929 | 3,723 | 16,630 | |||||||
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years | (1,253 | ) | (855 | ) | (874 | ) | ||||
Reductions based on tax settlements | (115 | ) | (16,587 | ) | — | |||||
Reductions based on expirations of statute of limitations | — | (636 | ) | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of end of period | $ | 43,319 | $ | 34,677 | $ | 48,874 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
We have $30As of December 31, 2013, we had $43.3 million inof unrecognized income tax benefits, that,of which $42.5 million, if recognized, could favorablywould affect our effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2012, we had $34.7 million of unrecognized income tax benefits, of which $34.7 million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. We do not expect to paybelieve that the total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits will significantly increase or effectively settle any of the unrecognized tax benefitsdecrease within the next twelve months.months due to the lapse of statute of limitations or settlement with tax authorities.
AccruedOur policy related to interest and penalties onfor uncertain tax positions are recordedis to record them as a component of “Interestincome tax expense netin the accompanying statement of amounts capitalized”operations. During 2013, 2012 and “Other, net,” respectively, on our Consolidated Statements
Table of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the year ended December 31, Contents
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
2011, we recorded an insignificant benefit for interest and penalty in earnings. There was no significant accruedamount of interest and penalties at December 31, 2011. The table above excludesas a component of income tax expense on the accompanying statements of operations.
Estimates of our uncertain tax positions are made based upon prior experience and are updated in light of changes in facts and circumstances. However, due to the uncertain and complex application of tax regulations, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of audits may result in liabilities which could be materially different from these amounts.estimates. In such an event, we will record additional income tax provision or income tax benefit in the period in which such resolution occurs.
Note 12. Stockholders' Equity
10.Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Preferred Stock
Our Board of Directors is authorized to divide the preferred stock into series and, with respect to each series, to determine the preferences and rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the series, including the dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights and terms, liquidation preferences, sinking fund provisions, the number of shares constituting the series, and the designation of such series. Our Board of Directors may, without stockholder approval, issue additional preferred stock of existing or new series with voting and other rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock and could have certain anti-takeover effects. As of December 31, 2013, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
The Class A, Class B, and Class C common stock are equivalent except for voting rights. Holders of Class A and Class C common stock are entitled to one vote per share and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share. Each share of Class B and Class C common stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into one share of Class A common stock. Upon a change in control of DISH Network, each holder of outstanding shares of Class C common stock is entitled to 10 votes for each share of Class C common stock held. Our principal stockholder owns the
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
majority of all outstanding Class B common stock and, together with all other stockholders, owns outstanding Class A common stock. There are no shares of Class C common stock outstanding.
Each holder of Class D common stock is not entitled to a vote on any matter. Each share of Class D common stock is entitled to receive dividends and distributions upon liquidation on a basis equivalent to that of the Class A common stock. There are no shares of Class D common stock outstanding.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
Pursuant to a stock repurchase plan approved by our Board of Directors, we are authorized to repurchase up to $500$500.0 million of our outstanding shares of Class A common stock through and including December 31, 2011. During2014. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we did not repurchase any common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we repurchased 34,000 shares of our Class A common stock for $605,000. On November 2, 2011, our Board of Directors extended the plan, such that we are authorized to make such repurchases through and including December 31, 2012.under this plan.
11.Note 13. Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We have an employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”"ESPP"), inunder which we are authorized to issue 2.5 million shares of Class A common stock. AtAs of December 31, 2011,2013, we had 1.91.4 million shares of Class A common stock which remain available for issuance under this plan. Substantially all full-time employees who have been employed by us for at least one calendar quarter are eligible to participate in
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
the ESPP. Employee stock purchases are made through payroll deductions. Under the terms of the ESPP, employees may not deduct an amount which would permit such employee to purchase our capital stock under all of our stock purchase plans at a rate which would exceed $25,000 in fair value of capital stock in any one year. The purchase price of the stock is 85%85.0% of the closing price of the Class A common stock on the last business day of each calendar quarter in which such shares of Class A common stock are deemed sold to an employee under the ESPP. During each ofFor the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, employee purchases of Class A common stock through the ESPP totaled 0.1 million shares.268,000 shares, 158,000 shares and 140,000 shares, respectively.
401(k) Employee Savings PlanPlans
We sponsor aDuring 2011 and 2012, we had two 401(k) Employee Savingsemployee savings plans; one for eligible employees of Hughes Communications which was in place prior to the Hughes Acquisition (the "Hughes 401(k) Plan") and one for all of our other eligible employees (the "EchoStar 401(k) Plan"). Effective January 1, 2013, all participant account balances under the EchoStar 401(k) Plan were transferred to the Hughes 401(k) Plan, which was then renamed, the EchoStar 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”"Plan"), resulting in a single 401(k) employee savings plan for all of our eligible employees. Voluntary employee contributions
Under the Plan, eligible employees may contribute up to 75.0% of their compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to the 401(k)Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") limit of $17,500 in 2013. Employee contributions are immediately vested. The Company will match 50 cents on the dollar for the first 6.0% of the employee's salary that they contribute to the Plan may be matched 50% by us, subject tofor a total of 3.0% match. The Company will match a maximum annual contribution of $1,500 per employee.$7,500. The Company match is calculated each pay period there is an employee contribution. Forfeitures of unvested participant balances which arewere retained by the EchoStar 401(k) Plan may be used to fund matching and discretionary contributions. Our Board of Directors may also authorize an annual discretionary contribution to the plan,Plan, subject to the maximum deductible limit provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. These contributions may be made in cash or in our stock. Matching contributions under the Plan vest at 20.0% per year and are 100%100.0% vested after an eligible employee has completed five years of service fromservice. Matching contributions for eligible employees who participated in the dateHughes 401(k) Plan prior to the conversion of the contribution. During each oftwo plans, vest 100.0% after the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized $1 million of matching contributions, net of forfeitures, and $4 million of discretionary stock contributions, net of forfeitures.
Hughes Communications has a 401(k) salary deferral program for its employees in the U.S., who have met certain service requirements. Eligible employees may contribute up to 25% (16% for highly compensated employees) of their eligible compensation into the plan on a pre-tax basis each payroll period, subject to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) limit of $16,500 in 2011. Employee contributions are immediately vested. We will match 100% of employee contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation and 50% of employee contributions on up to an additional 6% of eligible compensation. Matching contributions are 100% vested after eligible employees have completed three years of service. During
For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized matching contributions, net of forfeitures, of $6.1 million and discretionary stock contributions, net of forfeitures of $10.3 million to the Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we made $3recognized matching contributions, net of forfeitures, of $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and discretionary stock contributions, net of forfeitures of $4.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively, to the EchoStar 401(k) Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recognized $6.9 million and $3.5 million of matching contributions.
contributions, respectively, to the Hughes 401(k) Plan.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
In addition, as allowed by the IRS, participants who are age 50 or older may make additional contributions (“catch-up contributions”), up to $5,500 in 2011, into the plan. We do not match the catch-up contributions. The plan also permits participants to make contributions on an after-tax basis.
12.Note 14. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
We maintain stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees. Stock awards under these plans include both performanceperformance-based and non-performance based stock incentives. As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had outstanding under these plans stock options to acquire 8.86.3 million shares of our Class A common stock and 0.1 million restricted stock units. Stock options granted prior to and on December 31, 20112013 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of our Class A common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum term of ten years. While
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
historically we have issued stock awards subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20%over three to 33% per year,five years, some stock awards have been granted with immediate vesting and other stock awards vest only upon the achievement of certain company-wide objectives. As of December 31, 2011,2013, we had 4.84.6 million shares of our Class A common stock available for future grant under our stock incentive plans.
In connection with the Spin-off, as permitted by DISH Network’sNetwork's existing stock incentive plans and consistent with the Spin-off exchange ratio, each DISH Network stock option was converted into two stock options as follows:
·
·
Similarly, each holderholders of DISH Network restricted stock units retained his or hertheir DISH Network restricted stock units and received one EchoStar restricted stock unit for every five DISH Network restricted stock units that they held.
Consequently, the fair value of the DISH Network stock award and the new EchoStar stock award immediately following the Spin-off was equivalent to the fair value of such stock award immediately prior to the Spin-off.
As of December 31, 2011,2013, the following stock awards were outstanding:
|
| As of December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||
|
| EchoStar Awards |
| DISH Network Awards |
| ||||
Stock Awards Outstanding |
| Stock |
| Restricted |
| Stock |
| Restricted |
|
Held by EchoStar employees |
| 8,016,319 |
| 89,940 |
| 2,705,718 |
| 94,999 |
|
Held by DISH Network employees |
| 762,094 |
| 54,286 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
Total |
| 8,778,413 |
| 144,226 |
| 2,705,718 |
| 94,999 |
|
| | As of December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | EchoStar Awards | DISH Network Awards | |||||||||||
| | Stock Options | Restricted Stock Units | Stock Options | Restricted Stock Units | |||||||||
Held by EchoStar employees | 5,949,010 | 77,589 | 1,237,944 | 66,999 | |||||||||
Held by DISH Network employees | 322,048 | 44,288 | — | — | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total outstanding stock awards | 6,271,058 | 121,877 | 1,237,944 | 66,999 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We are responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to EchoStar common stock and DISH Network is responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to DISH Network common stock, regardless of whether such stock awards are held by our employees or DISH Network’sNetwork's employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our stock-based compensation expense, resulting from stock awards outstanding at the Spin-off date, is based on the stock awards held by our employees regardless of whether such stock awards were issued by EchoStar or DISH Network.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Accordingly, stock-based compensation that we expenserecognize with respect to DISH Network stock awards iswas included in “Additional"Additional paid-in capital” oncapital" in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Exercise prices for stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 20112013 are as follows:
|
| Options Outstanding |
| Options Exercisable |
| ||||||||||
Price Range |
| Number |
| Weighted- |
| Weighted- |
| Number |
| Weighted- |
| Weighted- |
| ||
$ - - $ 10.00 |
| 10,204 |
| 4.90 |
| $ | 3.66 |
| 10,204 |
| 4.90 |
| $ | 3.66 |
|
$ 10.01 - $ 15.00 |
| 798,032 |
| 7.25 |
| $ | 14.83 |
| 154,232 |
| 7.24 |
| $ | 14.83 |
|
$ 15.01 - $ 20.00 |
| 1,107,450 |
| 8.40 |
| $ | 18.88 |
| 226,250 |
| 8.05 |
| $ | 18.73 |
|
$ 20.01 - $ 25.00 |
| 2,028,513 |
| 6.04 |
| $ | 22.18 |
| 903,513 |
| 6.35 |
| $ | 21.45 |
|
$ 25.01 - $ 30.00 |
| 2,181,893 |
| 5.44 |
| $ | 28.70 |
| 1,378,393 |
| 5.04 |
| $ | 28.34 |
|
$ 30.01 - $ 35.00 |
| 73,441 |
| 5.22 |
| $ | 31.92 |
| 56,921 |
| 5.03 |
| $ | 31.94 |
|
$ 35.01 - $ 40.00 |
| 2,578,880 |
| 9.07 |
| $ | 37.30 |
| 124,759 |
| 4.89 |
| $ | 36.67 |
|
|
| 8,778,413 |
| 7.18 |
| $ | 27.22 |
| 2,854,272 |
| 5.81 |
| $ | 25.02 |
|
| | Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price Range | Number Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Number Exercisable as of December 31, 2013 | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years) | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
$0.00 - $10.00 | 2,653 | 2 | $ | 1.98 | 2,653 | 2 | $ | 1.98 | |||||||||||
$10.01 - $15.00 | 232,579 | 5 | $ | 14.83 | 80,179 | 5 | $ | 14.83 | |||||||||||
$15.01 - $20.00 | 464,216 | 6 | $ | 18.95 | 163,616 | 6 | $ | 18.95 | |||||||||||
$20.01 - $25.00 | 1,310,457 | 4 | $ | 22.53 | 632,257 | 5 | $ | 21.65 | |||||||||||
$25.01 - $30.00 | 1,154,906 | 5 | $ | 28.60 | 917,406 | 4 | $ | 28.72 | |||||||||||
$30.01 - $35.00 | 431,101 | 8 | $ | 33.99 | 307,001 | 8 | $ | 33.97 | |||||||||||
$35.01 - $40.00 | 2,660,146 | 8 | $ | 37.85 | 609,779 | 8 | $ | 37.84 | |||||||||||
$40.00 and above | 15,000 | 10 | $ | 47.19 | — | 0 | $ | — | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 6,271,058 | 6 | $ | 30.43 | 2,712,891 | 6 | $ | 28.69 | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock Award Activity
Our stock option activity was as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||||||||
|
| Options |
| Weighted- |
| Options |
| Weighted- |
| Options |
| Weighted- |
| |||
Total options outstanding, beginning of period |
| 7,795,373 |
| $ | 23.24 |
| 7,203,101 |
| $ | 24.85 |
| 5,184,415 |
| $ | 28.61 |
|
Granted |
| 2,655,000 |
| $ | 36.50 |
| 1,258,000 |
| $ | 19.15 |
| 2,523,000 |
| $ | 17.09 |
|
Exercised |
| (1,082,280 | ) | $ | 23.59 |
| (105,573 | ) | $ | 15.06 |
| (37,931 | ) | $ | 5.73 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
| (589,680 | ) | $ | 23.07 |
| (560,155 | ) | $ | 33.99 |
| (466,383 | ) | $ | 26.08 |
|
Total options outstanding, end of period |
| 8,778,413 |
| $ | 27.22 |
| 7,795,373 |
| $ | 23.24 |
| 7,203,101 |
| $ | 24.85 |
|
Performance based options outstanding, end of period (1) |
| 658,700 |
| $ | 25.30 |
| 697,100 |
| $ | 25.38 |
| 724,450 |
| $ | 25.40 |
|
Exercisable at end of period |
| 2,854,272 |
| $ | 25.02 |
| 2,722,709 |
| $ | 25.77 |
| 1,904,479 |
| $ | 29.46 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | |||||||||||||
Total options outstanding, beginning of period | 7,908,300 | $ | 27.21 | 8,078,413 | $ | 26.30 | 7,795,373 | $ | 23.24 | ||||||||||
Granted | 1,190,000 | $ | 38.75 | 771,000 | $ | 30.81 | 1,955,000 | $ | 36.01 | ||||||||||
Exercised | (2,494,893 | ) | $ | 24.65 | (569,073 | ) | $ | 20.02 | (1,082,280 | ) | $ | 23.59 | |||||||
Forfeited and cancelled | (332,349 | ) | $ | 27.01 | (372,040 | ) | $ | 25.71 | (589,680 | ) | $ | 23.07 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total options outstanding, end of period | 6,271,058 | $ | 30.43 | 7,908,300 | $ | 27.21 | 8,078,413 | $ | 26.30 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance-based options outstanding, end of period(1) | 629,300 | $ | 25.27 | 632,100 | $ | 25.28 | 658,700 | $ | 25.30 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exercisable at end of period | 2,712,891 | $ | 28.69 | 3,746,166 | $ | 25.98 | 2,854,272 | $ | 25.02 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We realized total tax benefits from stock awardsoptions exercised duringof $21.9 million, $3.1 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, 2010 and 2009 as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Tax benefit from stock awards exercised |
| $ | 4,612 |
| $ | 1,810 |
| $ | 1,044 |
|
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
respectively.
Based on the closing market price of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2011,2013, the aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options was $120.9 million for options outstanding and $57.6 million for options exercisable as follows:of December 31, 2013.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
|
| As of December 31, 2011 |
| ||||
|
| Options |
| Options |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value |
| $ | 8,118 |
| $ | 2,063 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Our restricted stock unit activity was as follows:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||||||||
|
| Restricted |
| Weighted- |
| Restricted |
| Weighted- |
| Restricted |
| Weighted- |
| |||
Total restricted stock units outstanding, beginning of period |
| 107,249 |
| $ | 27.33 |
| 130,040 |
| $ | 27.78 |
| 272,856 |
| $ | 29.40 |
|
Granted |
| 69,950 |
| $ | 32.00 |
| — |
| $ | — |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
Vested |
| (11,225 | ) | $ | 31.84 |
| (13,975 | ) | $ | 31.84 |
| (21,025 | ) | $ | 30.26 |
|
Forfeited and cancelled |
| (21,748 | ) | $ | 27.36 |
| (8,816 | ) | $ | 26.70 |
| (121,791 | ) | $ | 31.00 |
|
Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period |
| 144,226 |
| $ | 29.22 |
| 107,249 |
| $ | 27.33 |
| 130,040 |
| $ | 27.78 |
|
Restricted Performance Units outstanding, end of period (1) |
| 74,276 |
| $ | 26.61 |
| 93,274 |
| $ | 26.66 |
| 99,990 |
| $ | 26.56 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| | Restricted Stock Units | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | Restricted Stock Units | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | Restricted Stock Units | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Total restricted stock units outstanding, beginning of period | 151,683 | $ | 30.18 | 144,226 | $ | 29.22 | 107,249 | $ | 27.33 | ||||||||||
Granted | — | $ | — | 33,333 | $ | 34.22 | 69,950 | $ | 32.00 | ||||||||||
Vested | (22,876 | ) | $ | 33.08 | (16,210 | ) | $ | 32.61 | (11,225 | ) | $ | 31.84 | |||||||
Forfeited and cancelled | (6,930 | ) | $ | 24.88 | (9,666 | ) | $ | 25.84 | (21,748 | ) | $ | 27.36 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period | 121,877 | $ | 29.93 | 151,683 | $ | 30.18 | 144,226 | $ | 29.22 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Performance Units outstanding, end of period(1) | 57,680 | $ | 26.94 | 64,610 | $ | 26.72 | 74,276 | $ | 26.61 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
2005 LTIP. During 2005, DISH Network adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the “2005 LTIP”"2005 LTIP"). The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in combination, which vestvests over seven years at the rate of 10%10.0% per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20%20.0% per year thereafter. Exercise of the stock awards is subject to the foregoing vesting schedule and a performance condition that a company-specific goal is achieved by March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded in our financial statements unless and until the achievement of the performance condition is probable. The competitive nature of our industry and certain other factors can significantly impact achievement of the goal. Consequently, whileWhile it was determined that achievement of the goal was not probable as of December 31, 2011,2013, this assessment could change in the future.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
If all of the stock awards under the 2005 LTIP were vested and the goal had been met, or if we had determined that achievement of the goal was probable during the year endedas of December 31, 2011,2013, we would have recorded totaladditional non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for our employees as indicated in the table below. If the goal is metof $18.9 million,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
consisting of compensation expense of $16.1 million relating to DISH Network awards and there are unvested stock awards at that time, the vested amounts would be expensed immediately on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the unvested portion recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period.
|
| 2005 LTIP |
| ||||
|
|
|
| Vested |
| ||
|
| Total |
| Portion (1) |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
DISH Network awards held by EchoStar employees |
| $ | 15,116 |
| $ | 11,973 |
|
EchoStar awards held by EchoStar employees |
| 3,008 |
| 2,382 |
| ||
Total |
| $ | 18,124 |
| $ | 14,355 |
|
$2.8 million related to EchoStar awards.
| | 2005 LTIP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Total | Vested Portion(1) | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
DISH Network awards held by EchoStar employees | $ | 16,127 | $ | 16,098 | |||
EchoStar awards held by EchoStar employees | 2,774 | 2,768 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 18,901 | $ | 18,866 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2011 Number of Weighted- Stock options 658,700 $ 25.30 Restricted Performance Units 74,276 Total 732,976 Stock-Based Compensation Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for all of our employees is shown in the following table for the years ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 (In thousands) Research and development expenses $ 2,411 $ 3,579 $ 3,663 Selling, general and administrative expenses 13,653 9,967 9,708 Total non-cash, stock-based compensation $ 16,064 $ 13,546 $ 13,371 Research and development expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses Total stock-based compensation As of December 31, Of the 8.8 million stock options and 0.1 million restricted stock units outstanding under our stock incentive plans as of December 31, 2011, the following awards were outstanding pursuant to the 2005 LTIP:
Awards
Average
Exercise
Price2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 and was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for such employees: For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 (In thousands) $ 3,478 $ 2,755 $ 2,411 14,875 11,830 13,653 $ 18,353 $ 14,585 $ 16,064 2011, our2013, total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost, net of estimated forfeiture, related to our non-performance based unvested stock awards was $46 million and includes compensation expense that we will recognize for DISH Network stock awards held by our employees as a result of the Spin-off.$36.1 million. This cost is based on an estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 1.2%2.0% per year and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately threetwo years. Share-based compensation expense is recognized based on stock awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate can have a
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
Valuation
The fair value of each stock option granted for the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 was estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| ||||
Stock Options |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
| 1.08% - 2.57% |
| 1.64% - 2.97% |
| 1.70% - 3.16% |
|
Volatility factor |
| 34.68% - 38.92% |
| 31.00% - 32.73% |
| 28.48% - 42.68% |
|
Expected term of options in years |
| 5.1 - 6.0 |
| 6.1 - 6.2 |
| 3.0 - 6.4 |
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted |
| $8.07 - $14.42 |
| $6.44 - $9.11 |
| $4.76 - $7.43 |
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stock Options | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||
Risk-free interest rate | 0.99% - 1.54% | 0.82% - 1.33% | 1.08% - 2.57% | |||
Volatility factor | 37.54% - 42.23% | 40.36% - 41.12% | 34.68% - 38.92% | |||
Expected term of options in years | 5.4 - 5.5 | 5.9 - 6.0 | 5.1 - 6.0 | |||
Weighted-average grant-date fair value | $15.59 - $17.20 | $10.60 - $13.70 | $ 8.07 - $14.42 | |||
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and accordingly, the dividend yield percentage used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model is set atwas assumed to be zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded stock options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value may differ from other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of our stock options as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
13.Note 15. Acquisitions
When we acquire a business, we allocateassign the purchase price to the various components of the acquisitionacquired assets and liabilities based upon thetheir fair value of each component using various valuation techniques, including the market approach, income approach, and/or cost approach.
The accounting standard for business combinations requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired to be recorded at fair value. Transaction costs related to the acquisition of the business are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with the issuance of debt associated with a business combination are capitalized and included as a yield adjustment to the underlying debt’sdebt's stated rate.
Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their estimated useful lives unless the lives are determined to be indefinite.
Hughes Communications
On June 8, 2011, we completed the Hughes Acquisition, pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger (the “Hughes Agreement”"Hughes Agreement") by and between us, certain of our subsidiaries, including EchoStar Satellite Services L.L.C., and Hughes Communications, Inc. Pursuant to the Hughes Agreement, 100%100.0% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock and vested stock options of Hughes Communications, Inc. were converted into the right to receive $60.70 (minus any applicable exercise price) in cash and substantially all of the outstanding debt of Hughes Communications, Inc. was repaid. The funding of the Hughes Acquisition was supported by the issuance of the Notes. See Note 810 for further discussion.
In connection with the Hughes Acquisition, each share of unvested restricted stock and unvested stock option of Hughes Communications, Inc. was converted into the right to receive $60.70 (minus any applicable exercise price) in cash on the vesting date of the stock award. As of December 31, 2011,2013, our maximum liability for these unvested stock
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
awards of Hughes Communications, Inc. was approximately $33$4.4 million, which is payable based on the original vesting terms of the stock award. Of the $33$4.4 million, $19$3.5 million was accrued as of December 31, 2011,2013, the remainder of which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period associated with the original stock award, the last of which expires in 2014.
Hughes Communications is thea global leader in broadband satellite technologies and services and a leading provider of managed network services. Together with Hughes Communications,, Inc., we have an extensive fleet of owned and leased satellites, experienced personnel and communications facilities around the world. The Hughes Acquisition significantly expands our ability to provide new video and data products and solutions.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
The Hughes Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. However, we have not completed allocating theThe aggregate purchase price amongfor the acquisition was assigned to the acquired assets that were acquired and thus the allocationliabilities, as follows:
| | Amount | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||
Cash | $ | 98,900 | ||
Marketable investment securities | 22,148 | |||
Other current assets | 282,471 | |||
Property and equipment | 930,426 | |||
Goodwill (non-deductible) | 504,173 | |||
Other intangible assets | 420,907 | |||
Regulatory authorizations | 400,000 | |||
Other noncurrent assets | 61,463 | |||
Current liabilities | (293,029 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liabilities | (220,928 | ) | ||
Long-term liabilities | (22,239 | ) | ||
Noncontrolling interests | (9,679 | ) | ||
| | | | | |
Total purchase price | $ | 2,174,613 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
During 2011, in the table below may change.
|
| Preliminary |
| |
|
| Purchase Price |
| |
|
| Allocation |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Cash |
| $ | 98,900 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
| 22,148 |
| |
Other current assets |
| 282,471 |
| |
Property and equipment |
| 930,426 |
| |
Intangibles |
| 420,907 |
| |
Goodwill (non-deductible) |
| 516,198 |
| |
FCC authorizations |
| 400,000 |
| |
Other noncurrent assets |
| 55,776 |
| |
Current liabilities |
| (293,029 | ) | |
Deferred tax liabilities |
| (227,266 | ) | |
Long-term liabilities |
| (22,239 | ) | |
Non-controlling interest |
| (9,679 | ) | |
Total purchase price |
| $ | 2,174,613 |
|
In connection with the Hughes Acquisition, we incurred $35$35.3 million of acquisition related transaction costs consisting primarily of banking, bond forfeiture, legal and accounting fees. These costs are included in “Other, net” on"Other, net" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we incurred $58 million of debt issuance costs, which are included in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we amortized $3 million of debt issuance costs which is included in “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated operating results for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 give effect to the Hughes Acquisition as if it occurred on January 1, 2010. These pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have occurred if these transactions had occurred on such date and should not be used as a predictive measure of our future financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. The pro forma adjustments are based on currently available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable.
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| ||||
Supplemental pro forma financial information (Unaudited) |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
| ||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 3,226,721 |
| $ | 3,387,978 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 21,582 |
| $ | 109,582 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.25 |
| $ | 1.29 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.25 |
| $ | 1.29 |
|
Supplemental pro forma financial information (Unaudited) | For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenue | $ | 3,226,721 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 21,582 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Basic EPS | $ | 0.25 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Diluted EPS | $ | 0.25 | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Effective June 9, 2011, revenue and expenses associated with the Hughes Acquisition are included within the Hughes segment in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). See Note 1517 for further discussion.information.
Move Networks
On December 31, 2010, we acquired certain assets of Move Networks, Inc. for $45 million. These assets include patented technology that enables the adaptive delivery of video content via the Internet which will allow us to expand our portfolio of advanced technologies serving cable, satellite, telecommunications companies and IPTV video providers. This transaction was accounted for as a business combination. The allocation of the purchase price is in the table below.
|
| Purchase Price |
| |
|
| Allocation |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
In-process R&D |
| $ | 26,482 |
|
Property and equipment |
| 7,213 |
| |
Goodwill (deductible) |
| 6,457 |
| |
Other intangibles |
| 4,271 |
| |
Accounts receivable |
| 535 |
| |
Other current |
| 33 |
| |
Total purchase price |
| $ | 44,991 |
|
The transaction did not have an impact on our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 and would not have materially impacted our results of operations for 2010 had the transaction occurred on January 1, 2010.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
14.Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
As of December 31, 2011, future maturities ofThe following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2013 and the effect such obligations are summarized as follows:expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
|
| Payments due by period |
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Total |
| 2012 |
| 2013 |
| 2014 |
| 2015 |
| 2016 |
| Thereafter |
| |||||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
| $ | 2,006,644 |
| $ | 1,171 |
| $ | 1,049 |
| $ | 1,112 |
| $ | 1,139 |
| $ | 1,049 |
| $ | 2,001,124 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
| 527,618 |
| 64,068 |
| 66,502 |
| 70,177 |
| 25,440 |
| 27,731 |
| 273,700 |
| |||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
| 1,496,237 |
| 190,396 |
| 184,137 |
| 177,829 |
| 173,174 |
| 170,435 |
| 600,266 |
| |||||||
Satellite-related obligations |
| 845,107 |
| 325,508 |
| 104,703 |
| 72,759 |
| 50,214 |
| 42,686 |
| 249,237 |
| |||||||
Operating lease obligations |
| 73,695 |
| 21,941 |
| 15,985 |
| 12,539 |
| 8,708 |
| 6,593 |
| 7,929 |
| |||||||
Purchase and other obligations |
| 418,215 |
| 408,257 |
| 2,837 |
| 2,120 |
| 1,667 |
| 1,667 |
| 1,667 |
| |||||||
Payments in connection with acquisitions |
| 14,034 |
| 5,437 |
| 5,137 |
| 3,460 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||||
Total |
| $ | 5,381,550 |
| $ | 1,016,778 |
| $ | 380,350 |
| $ | 339,996 |
| $ | 260,342 |
| $ | 250,161 |
| $ | 3,133,923 |
|
| | Payments due in the Year Ending December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Total | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 2,001,588 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 150 | $ | 7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,000,000 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligations | 420,800 | 68,360 | 28,005 | 29,074 | 32,414 | 35,949 | 226,998 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 1,143,017 | 180,475 | 175,822 | 172,990 | 169,863 | 166,378 | 277,489 | |||||||||||||||
Satellite-related obligations | 1,106,738 | 466,992 | 236,438 | 68,222 | 52,414 | 45,914 | 236,758 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 71,170 | 22,143 | 18,589 | 12,918 | 8,460 | 2,830 | 6,230 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase and other obligations | 212,108 | 207,107 | 1,667 | 1,667 | 1,667 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 4,955,421 | $ | 946,508 | $ | 460,671 | $ | 284,878 | $ | 264,818 | $ | 251,071 | $ | 2,747,475 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
“"Satellite-related obligations”obligations" primarily includes, among other things, our transponderpayment pursuant to agreements and two launch contracts for satellites that are currently under construction, as described below.
·EchoStar XVI. During November 2009, we entered into a contract for the construction of the EchoStar XVI, a DBS satellite, which is expected to be launched during the second half of 2012XIX and will operate at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. DISH Network has agreed to lease all of the capacity on this satellite from us for a portion of its useful life. As of December 31, 2011, the remaining obligation related to EchoStar XVI of $65 million, including the launch contract, is included in the table above.
·EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. During June 2009, Hughes Communications entered into a contract for the construction of EchoStar XVII/Jupiter, which is expectedTerreStar-2 satellites, payments pursuant to launch in the summer of 2012. Barrett Xplore Inc. has agreedservices contracts, executory costs for our capital lease satellites, costs under transponder agreements and in-orbit incentives relating to lease the user beams designed to operate in Canada, which represents a portion of the capacity available on EchoStar XVII/Jupiter. As of December 31, 2011, the remaining obligation related to EchoStar XVII/Jupiter of $108 million, including the launch contract, is included in the table above. During the first quarter 2012, we secured launch insurance and one year in-orbit insurance for a total of $34 million which is not included in the table above.
certain satellites.
Our “Purchase"Purchase and other obligations”obligations" primarily consistconsists of binding purchase orders for digital set-top boxes and related components, digital broadcast operations and professional services agreement.components. Our purchase obligations can fluctuate significantly from period to period due to, among other things, management’smanagement's control of inventory levels, and can materially impact our future operating asset and liability balances, and our future working capital requirements. These purchase obligations will be paid from 2011 through 2017.
The table above does not include $30 million ofamounts related to deferred tax liabilities, associated with unrecognized tax benefitspositions and certain other amounts recorded in our noncurrent liabilities as the timing of any payments is uncertain. The table also excludes long-term deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities that were accrued as of December 31, 2011 and are included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We do not expect any portion of this amount to be paid or settled within the next 12 months.
require future cash payments.
In certain circumstances, the dates on which we are obligated to make these paymentspay our contractual obligations could be delayed. These amounts will increase to the extent we procure insurance for our satellites or contract for the construction, launch or lease of additional satellites.change.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Acquisition of Brazilian Orbital Slot. On August 30, 2011, we were declared the winner of the right to select an orbital slot in an auction conducted by ANATEL, the Brazilian communications regulatory authority. We selected the 45 degree west longitude orbital location for a bid of approximately $77 million using an exchange rate of $1 to 1.8758 Brazilian Real as of December 30, 2011. This amount is not included in the table above. We must comply with certain post-auction regulatory and payment requirements before we will receive the orbital slot. Once we receive the orbital slot, the slot will be used to expand our video and data capabilities in South America.
Rent Expense
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, 2010, and 2009, total rent expense for operating leases approximated $39we recorded $22.6 million, $25$23.4 million and $7$16.9 million, respectively. The increase in rentrespectively, of operating lease expense from 2010 to 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in costs relatedrelating to the EchoStar I satelliteleases of office, equipment, and an increase in costs related toother facilities. Rent expense excludes satellite-related expenses incurred of $181.2 million, $161.6 million and $109.7 million for the Hughes Acquisition. The increase in rent expense from 2009 to 2010 primarily resulted from an increase in costs related to the EchoStar I satellite, which we began leasing from DISH Network during the first quarter of 2010.years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively
Patents and Intellectual Property
Many entities, including some of our competitors, have or may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services directly or indirectly related to those that we offer. We may not be aware of all patents and other intellectual property rights that our products and services may potentially infringe. Damages in patent infringement cases can include a triplingbe
Table of actual damagesContents
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
substantial, and in certain cases.circumstances can be trebled. Further, we cannot estimate the extent to which we may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect to intellectual property rights held by others and the availability and cost of any such licenses. Various parties have asserted patent and other intellectual property rights with respect to components within our direct broadcast satellite products and services. We cannot be certain that these persons do not own the rights they claim, that these rights are not valid or that our products and services do not infringe on these rights. Further, we cannot be certain that we would be able to obtain licenses from these persons on commercially reasonable terms or, if we were unable to obtain such licenses, that we would be able to redesign our products and services to avoid infringement.
Contingencies
Separation Agreement
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a separation agreement with DISH Network that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, we have assumed certain liabilities that relate to our business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, we will only be liable for our acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify us for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as DISH Network’sNetwork's acts or omissions following the Spin-off.
Litigation
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities. Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these casesproceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages. We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate. If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal fees and other costs of defending litigation are charged to expense as incurred.
For certain cases described below, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties are involved (as with many patent-related cases). For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
Broadcast Innovation, L.L.C.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
During 2001, Broadcast Innovation,California Institute of Technology
On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology ("Caltech") filed suit against two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, as well as against DISH Network, DISH Network L.L.C. (“Broadcast Innovation”, and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,116,710; 7,421,032; 7,916,781; and 8,284,833, each of which is entitled "Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes." Caltech appears to assert that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes each of the asserted patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to our consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
CRFD Research, Inc. (a subsidiary of Marathon Patent Group, Inc.)
On January 17, 2014, CRFD Research, Inc. ("CRFD") filed a lawsuitcomplaint against EchoStar Corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as against DISH Network, DirecTV, Thomson Consumer ElectronicsDISH DBS and othersDISH Network L.L.C., in U.S.United States District Court in Denver, Colorado. Broadcast Innovationfor the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,191,233 (the "233 patent"). The 233 patent is entitled "System for Automated, Mid-Session, User-Directed, Device-to-Device Session Transfer System," and relates to transferring an ongoing software session from one device to another. CRFD alleges that certain of our set-top boxes infringe the 233 patent. On the same day, CRFD filed patent infringement complaints against AT&T Inc., Comcast Corp., DirecTV, Time Warner Cable Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Level 3 Communications, Inc., Akamai Technologies, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corp. and Limelight Networks, Inc. CRFD is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. The suit alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,076,094 (the “‘094 patent”) and 4,992,066 (the “‘066 patent”). The ‘094 patent relates to certain methods and devices for transmitting and receiving data along with specific formatting information for the data. The ‘066 patent relates to certain methods and devices for providing the scrambling circuitry for a pay television system on removable cards. Subsequently, DirecTV and Thomson settled with Broadcast Innovation leaving DISH Network as the only defendant.
During 2004, the District Court issued an order finding the ‘066 patent invalid. Also in 2004, the District Court found the ‘094 patent invalid in a parallel case filed by Broadcast Innovation against Charter and Comcast. In 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned that finding of invalidity with respect to the ‘094 patent and remanded the Charter case back to the District Court. During June 2006, Charter filed a request for reexamination of the ‘094 patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and on December 13, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a certificate cancelling all claims of the ‘094 patent. On February 2, 2012, Broadcast Innovation dismissed the case against DISH Network with prejudice.
Cyberfone Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, LLC)
On September 15, 2011, LVL Patent Group, LLC filed a complaint against us and our wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, and DirecTV, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,044,382, which is entitled “Data Transaction Assembly Server.” On November 18, 2011, Cyberfone Systems, LLC (f/k/a LVL Patent Group, LLC) filed an amended complaint making the same claim. DirecTV was dismissed from the case on January 4, 2012.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
InterADE-Contact Technologies, LLC
On February 22, 2012, E-Contact Technologies, LLC ("E-Contact") filed suit against two of our indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,347,579, which is entitled "Personal Computer Diary." E-Contact appeared to assert that some portion of HughesNet email services infringed that patent. On April 17, 2013, the Court ordered E-Contact to show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed in light of a number of E-Contact's patent claims being invalidated in an associated case,E-Contact Technologies, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. et al., 1:11-cv-432 (E.D. Tex.). On April 22, 2013, the Court granted a stipulated motion that dismissed with prejudice E-Contact's claims against us, and the matter is now concluded.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
The Hopper Litigation
On May 24, 2012, DISH Network L.L.C., filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. ("ABC"), CBS Corporation ("CBS"), Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Television Holdings, Inc., Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. (collectively, "Fox") and NBCUniversal Media, LLC ("NBC"). The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment that DISH Network L.L.C is not infringing any defendant's copyright, or breaching any defendant's retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop™ features in the Hopper™ set-top boxes we design and sell to DISH Network. A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days. A consumer can use the AutoHop feature at his or her option, to watch certain recordings the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back the next day after the show's original airing.
Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against DISH Network and DISH Network L.L.C. (collectively, "DISH") in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as DISH's use of Sling placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC, Universal Network Television, LLC, Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal Media, LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against DISH in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights.
As a result of certain parties' competing counterclaims and venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks filing various amended complaints, the claims are presently pending in the following venues: (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC parties are pending in New York; (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the CBS parties are pending in New York; (3) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox parties are pending in California; and (4) the copyright and contract claims regarding the NBC parties are pending in California.
On September 16, 2011, InterAD Technologies, LLC (“InterAD”)21, 2012, the United States District Court for the Central District of California heard the Fox plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box's PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features and, on November 7, 2012, entered an order denying the motion. The Fox plaintiffs appealed and on July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, which was denied on January 24, 2014. On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs.
On August 17, 2012, the NBC plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint againstin their California action adding us and our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., as well as DISH Network L.L.C. a wholly-owned to the NBC litigation, alleging various claims of copyright infringement. We and our subsidiary of DISH Network, Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, AT&T, Inc., Bright House Networks, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications Holding Company, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., CSC Holdings, LLC, DirecTV, Inc., Insight Communications Company, Inc., Knology, Inc., Mediacom Broadband, LLC, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc., and Verizon, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. answered on September 18,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
2012. On October 9, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C., with the CBS plaintiffs filing similar copyright counterclaims in the New York action against EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. on October 12, 2012. Additionally, the CBS plaintiffs have filed a counterclaim alleging that DISH fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating renewal of its CBS retransmission consent agreement. On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box's PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion. The ABC plaintiffs appealed, and oral argument on the appeal began on February 20, 2014 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In addition, on February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against: (i) DISH, seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers™ feature in the second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of a retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH, seeking to enjoin the Sling placeshifting functionality in the second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement by both defendants, and breach of the earlier-mentioned retransmission consent agreement by DISH. A hearing on that motion was held on April 19, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs' motion was denied on September 23, 2013, and the Fox plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on October 22, 2013. The Fox claims are set for trial on January 13, 2015, and the ABC and CBS claims are set to be trial-ready on April 17, 2015.
5,438,355,We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to DISH Network. An adverse decision against DISH Network could decrease the number of Sling enabled set-top boxes we sell to DISH Network, which is entitled “Interactive Systemcould have an adverse impact on the business operations of our EchoStar Technologies segment. In addition, to the extent that DISH Network experiences fewer gross new subscriber additions, sales of our digital set-top boxes and related components to DISH Network may further decline, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Lightsquared/Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Bankruptcy)
On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, "Harbinger"), a shareholder of LightSquared Inc., filed an adversary proceeding against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation, L-Band Acquisition, LLC ("LBAC"), Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman), SP Special Opportunities, LLC ("SPSO") (an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen), and certain other parties, in the LightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Processing Viewer Responsesthe Southern District of New York (the "Bankruptcy Court"), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC). Harbinger alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage related to Television Programming.” certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SPSO. Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation and LBAC.
On January 5, 2012, InterAD voluntarilyOctober 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the caseclaims against us without prejudice.in Harbinger's complaint in their entirety, but granted leave for LightSquared to file its own complaint in intervention. On November 15, 2013, LightSquared filed its complaint, which included various claims against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation, Mr. Ergen and SPSO. On December 2, 2013, Harbinger filed an amended complaint, asserting various claims against SPSO. On December 12, 2013,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
Joao Control & Monitoring SystemsNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
the Bankruptcy Court dismissed several of the claims asserted by LightSquared and Harbinger. The surviving claims include, among others, LightSquared's claims against SPSO for declaratory relief, breach of contract and statutory disallowance; LightSquared's tortious interference claim against EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network Corporation and Mr. Ergen; and Harbinger's claim against SPSO for equitable disallowance. These claims proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 9, 2014, which concluded on January 17, 2014. The parties are in the process of post-trial briefing and a hearing for closing arguments has been set for March 12, 2014.
During DecemberWe intend to vigorously defend this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Nazomi Communications, Inc.
On February 10, 2010, Joao Control & Monitoring Systems (“Joao”Nazomi Communications, Inc. ("Nazomi") filed suit against Sling Media, Inc. ("Sling"), our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, ACTI Corporation, ADT Security, Alarmclub.Com, American Honda Motor Company, BMW, Byremote, Drivecam, Honeywell, Iveda Corporation, Magtec Products, Mercedes-Benz, On-Net Surveillance, OnStar, SafeFreight Technology, Skyway Security, SmartVue Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, Tyco, UTC Fireas well as Nokia Corp, Nokia Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Western Digital Corp., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Garmin Corp., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Vizio Inc. and XanbooiOmega Corp in the U.S.United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent Nos. 6,549,130No. 7,080,362 (the "362 patent") and 6,587,046.United States Patent No. 7,225,436 (the "436 patent"). The abstracts of362 patent and the patents state that436 patent relate to Java hardware acceleration. On August 14, 2012, the claims are directed to the remote control of devices and appliances. Joao is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. During 2011, the case was transferred toUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California.
California, to which the case had earlier been transferred, granted Sling's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. On January 10, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court's grant of summary judgment.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Nazomi Communications, Inc.Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC
On February 10, 2010, Nazomi Communications, Inc. (“Nazomi”November 30, 2012, Network Acceleration Technologies, LLC ("NAT") filed suit against Sling Media, Inc.,Hughes Network Systems, LLC, our indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, Nokia Corp, Nokia Inc., Microsoft Corp., Amazon.com Inc., Western Digital Corp., Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Garmin Ltd., Garmin Corp., Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Vizio Inc. and iOmega Corp in the U.S.United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaDelaware alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. 7,080,3626,091,710 (the “‘362 patent”"710 patent"), which is entitled "System and U.S. Patent No. 7,225,436 (the “‘436 patent”). The ‘362Method for Preventing Data Slow Down Over Asymmetric Data Transmission Links." NAT re-filed its case on July 19, 2013. NAT is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent and the ‘436 patent relate to Java hardware acceleration. The suit alleges that the Slingbox-Pro-HD product infringes the ‘362 patent and the ‘436 patent because the Slingbox-PRO HD allegedly incorporates an ARM926EJ-S processor core capable of Java hardware acceleration. During 2010, the case was transferred to the Northern District of California.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringeportfolio without itself practicing any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
NorthPoint Technology, Ltd.
On July 2, 2009, NorthPoint Technology, Ltd. (“NorthPoint”) filed suit against us, DISH Network, and DirecTV in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,208,636 (the “‘636 patent”). The ‘636 patent relates to the use of multiple low-noise block converter feedhorns, or LNBFs, which are antennas used for satellite reception. On April 21, 2011, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued an order granting reexamination of the ‘636 patent. On June 21, 2011, the District Court entered summary judgment in our favor, finding that all asserted claims of the ‘636 patent are invalid. NorthPoint has appealed.
recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/oras well as an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
date of the Spin-off.ongoing royalty obligation. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Personalized Media Communications, Inc.
During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”("PMC") filed suit against us,EchoStar Corporation, DISH Network and Motorola Inc. in the U.S.United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent Nos. 4,694,490, 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing. PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving DISH Network and us as defendants. Trial is currently set for August 2012.
On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, "Gemstar") as a party, and added a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstar's license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and we are sub licensees. A new trial date has not yet been set.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could requirecause us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Premier International Associates, LLC
Suomen Colorize Oy
During October 2010, Suomen Colorize Oy (“Suomen”On August 3, 2012, Premier International Associates, LLC ("Premier International Associates") filed suit against usEchoStar Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. and DISH Network and its indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, DISH DBS and DISH Network L.L.C., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of DISH Network, in the U.S.United States District Court for the MiddleNorthern District of FloridaIllinois alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. 7,277,398.6,243,725 (the "725 patent"), which is entitled "List Building System." The abstract of the725 patent states that the claims are directedrelates to a method and terminalsystem for providing services in a telecommunications network. Suomenbuilding an inventory of audio/visual works. Premier International Associates is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. TheOn March 27, 2013, Premier International Associates dismissed the action was transferredagainst us and the DISH Network defendants with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement under which we and the U.S.DISH Network defendants made an immaterial payment in exchange for a license to certain patents and patent applications.
Shareholder Derivative Litigation
On December 5, 2012, Greg Jacobi, derivatively on behalf of EchoStar Corporation, filed suit (the "Jacobi Litigation") against Charles W. Ergen, Michael T. Dugan, R. Stanton Dodge, Tom A. Ortolf, C. Michael Schroeder, Joseph P. Clayton, David K. Moskowitz, and EchoStar Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado,Nevada. The complaint alleges that a March 2011 attempted grant of 1.5 million stock options to Charles Ergen breached defendants' fiduciary duties, resulted in unjust enrichment, and constituted a waste of corporate assets.
On December 18, 2012, Chester County Employees' Retirement Fund, derivatively on behalf of EchoStar Corporation, filed a suit (the "Chester County Litigation") against Charles W. Ergen, Michael T. Dugan, R. Stanton Dodge, Tom A. Ortolf, C. Michael Schroeder, Anthony M. Federico, Pradman P. Kaul, Joseph P. Clayton, and EchoStar Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The complaint similarly alleges that the March 2011 attempted grant of
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
1.5 million stock options to Charles Ergen breached defendants' fiduciary duties, resulted in unjust enrichment, and constituted a waste of corporate assets.
On February 22, 2013, the Chester County Litigation was transferred to the District of Nevada, and on January 10, 2012, Suomen voluntarily dismissedApril 3, 2013, the case against us without prejudice.Chester County Litigation was consolidated into the Jacobi Litigation.
Of the attempted grant of 1.5 million options to Mr. Ergen in 2011, only 800,000 were validly granted and remain outstanding. We intend to vigorously defend these cases. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability.
Technology Development and Licensing, L.L.C.LLC
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing, L.L.C. (“TDL”LLC ("TDL") filed suit against usEchoStar Corporation and DISH Network in the U.S.United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. In July 2009, the Court granted our motion to stay the case pending two reexamination petitions before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could requirecause us to materially modify certain user-friendly features that we currently offer to consumers. We are being indemnified by DISH Network for any potential liability or damages resulting from this suit relating to the period prior to the effective date of the Spin-off. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
TiVo Inc.TQP Development, LLC
In connection with our litigation with TiVo Inc. (“TiVo”), which is described in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3. Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.,” on April 20, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the District Court’s contempt ruling on infringement, articulated a new standard for determining “colorable difference” and remanded that issue back to the District Court for determination. The Federal Circuit also vacated the District
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Court’s amended injunction requiring that we inform the court of any further attempts to design around TiVo’s U.S. Patent No. 6,233,389 (the “‘389 patent”) and seek approval from the court before any such design-around is implemented. The Federal Circuit also vacated the infringement damages for the period after we deployed our original alternative technology (although it did not foreclose that damages may be reinstated if upon remand a new court or jury decision found that the original alternative technology infringed TiVo’s ‘389 patent). The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s contempt ruling on disablement, holding that the original 2006 injunction required that we disable DVR functionality in all but approximately 192,000 digital set-top boxes deployed with customers (the “Disablement Provision”) and affirmed the $90 million in contempt sanctions awarded against us for violating the Disablement Provision.
On April 29, 2011, we and DISH Network entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo. The settlement resolves all pending litigation between us and DISH Network, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH Network digital video recorders, or DVRs, which litigation is described in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission including in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under the caption “Item 3. Legal Proceedings — TiVo Inc.”
Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation has been dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by us and DISH Network have been dissolved. We and DISH Network are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments betweenOctober 11, 2012, and 2017. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with our Spin-off from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for a contribution from us totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to our sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer. Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and us based on historical sales of certain licensed products with our being responsible for 5% of each annual payment, or approximately $10 million in total. Of our initial payment of $10 million, approximately $8 million relates to prior periods and the remaining $2 million represents a prepayment. The prepayment of $2 million is being expensed ratably from April 1, 2011 through July 31, 2018, the expiration date of the ‘389 patent.
In addition, under the settlement agreement, TiVo granted us a license under its ‘389 patent and certain related patents, for the remaining life of those patents, solely to design and make certain DVR-enabled products for DISH Network and two international customers. We granted TiVo a license under certain DVR-related patents held by us for TiVo-branded, co-branded and ingredient branded products.
We and DISH Network, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, have also agreed on mutual releases of certain related claims and agreed not to challenge each other’s DVR technology-related patents that are licensed under the settlement agreement.
Because both we and DISH Network were defendants in the TiVo lawsuit, we and DISH Network were jointly and severally liable to TiVo for any final damages and sanctions that could have been awarded by the District Court. As previously disclosed, DISH Network agreed that it was obligated under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off to indemnify us for substantially all liability arising from this lawsuit. We contributed an amount equal to our $5 million intellectual property liability limit under the receiver agreement, and during 2009, we recorded a charge included in “General and administrative expenses — DISH Network” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for this amount to reflect this contribution. We and DISH Network have further agreed that our $5 million contribution would not exhaust our liability to DISH Network for other intellectual property claims that may arise under the receiver agreement. We and DISH Network also agreed that we would each be entitled to joint ownership of, and a cross-license to use, any intellectual property developed in connection with any potential new alternative technology. Any amounts that we are responsible for under the settlement agreement with TiVo are in addition to the $5 million contribution previously made by us.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Vigilos,TQP Development, LLC
On February 23, 2011, Vigilos, LLC ("TQP") filed suit against us, two of our subsidiaries,indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary, Sling Media, Inc. and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., and Monsoon Multimedia, Inc. in the U.S.United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of U.S.United States Patent No. 6,839,731,5,412,730, which is entitled “System and Method"Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Providing Data CommunicationRandomly Altering the Encryption Keys." On November 14, 2012, TQP filed suit in a Device Network.” Subsequently in 2011, Vigilos added DISHthe same venue against Hughes Network L.L.C., aSystems, LLC, our indirectly wholly owned subsidiary, of DISH Network, as a defendant in its First Amended Complaint and the case was transferred to the Northern District of California. Later in 2011, Vigilos filed a Second Amended Complaint that added claims foralleging infringement of the same patent. TQP is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On July 8, 2013, the Court granted a second patent, U.S. Patent No. 7,370,074, which is entitled “System and Method for Implementing Open-Protocol Remote Device Control.”
joint motion to dismiss the claims against Sling without prejudice.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents,patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers.damages. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
15.NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
Note 17. Segment Reporting
Operating segments are business components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker(s) of an enterprise. Total assets by segment have not been specified becausemaker ("CODM"), who for EchoStar is the information is not available to the chief operating decision-maker.Company's Chief Executive Officer. Under this definition, we operate three primary business segments.
·
·Hughes — which provides satellite broadband Internet accessThe primary measure of segment profitability that is reported regularly to North American consumers and broadband network services and systems to the domestic and international enterprise markets. Hughes also provides managed services to large enterprises and networking systems solutions to customers for mobile satellite and wireless backhaul systems. Hughes became a new segment as a result of the Hughes Acquisition and the results of operations of Hughes Communications are included in this report effective June 9, 2011. See Note 13 for further discussion of the Hughes Acquisition.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
The “All Other” category consists of revenue and net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar from other operations including our corporate investment portfolio for which segment disclosure requirements do not apply. In addition, this category includes interest expense related to the Notes, net of capitalized interest. Transactions between segments were not significant.
The following table reports our operating segment data and reconcilesCODM is earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, (“EBITDA”)or EBITDA. Our segment operating results do not include real estate and other activities, costs of certain business development activities, expenses of various corporate departments and our centralized treasury operations, including income from our investment portfolio and interest expense on our debt. These activities are accounted for in the "All Other and Eliminations" column in the table below. Total assets by segment have not been reported herein because the information is not provided to our CODM on a regular basis. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, transactions between segments were not significant.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
The following tables present revenue, capital expenditures, and EBITDA for each of our operating segments and reconciles total consolidated EBITDA to reported “Net"Income (loss) before income (loss) attributable to EchoStar”taxes" in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss):
|
|
|
| EchoStar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| EchoStar |
| Satellite |
|
|
| All |
|
|
| |||||
|
| Technologies |
| Services |
| Hughes |
| Other & |
| Consolidated |
| |||||
|
| Segment |
| Segment |
| Segment |
| Eliminations |
| Total |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 1,780,642 |
| $ | 278,125 |
| $ | 676,222 |
| $ | 26,442 |
| $ | 2,761,431 |
|
EBITDA (1) |
| 144,753 |
| 197,848 |
| 167,100 |
| (26,895 | ) | 482,806 |
| |||||
Interest income |
| — |
| 250 |
| 1,510 |
| 9,061 |
| 10,821 |
| |||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
| (19 | ) | (39,929 | ) | (802 | ) | (41,843 | ) | (82,593 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net |
| (48,321 | ) | (40,220 | ) | 34,543 |
| 32,497 |
| (21,501 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (91,975 | ) | (100,013 | ) | (166,195 | ) | (27,711 | ) | (385,894 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 4,438 |
| $ | 17,936 |
| $ | 36,156 |
| $ | (54,891 | ) | $ | 3,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 2,070,672 |
| $ | 262,022 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 17,675 |
| $ | 2,350,369 |
|
EBITDA (1) |
| 159,713 |
| 183,549 |
| — |
| 174,510 |
| 517,772 |
| |||||
Interest income |
| (90 | ) | 20 |
| — |
| 14,542 |
| 14,472 |
| |||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
| (12 | ) | (40,977 | ) | — |
| 26,429 |
| (14,560 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net |
| (25,349 | ) | (27,653 | ) | — |
| (31,413 | ) | (84,415 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (113,675 | ) | (94,943 | ) | — |
| (20,293 | ) | (228,911 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 20,587 |
| $ | 19,996 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 163,775 |
| $ | 204,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 1,709,670 |
| $ | 173,673 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 20,216 |
| $ | 1,903,559 |
|
EBITDA (1) |
| 83,305 |
| 125,833 |
| — |
| 466,224 |
| 675,362 |
| |||||
Interest income |
| 1,066 |
| — |
| — |
| 25,375 |
| 26,441 |
| |||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
| (167 | ) | (31,463 | ) | — |
| (685 | ) | (32,315 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net |
| 13,031 |
| 5,124 |
| — |
| (78,810 | ) | (60,655 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (117,447 | ) | (107,440 | ) | — |
| (19,242 | ) | (244,129 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | (20,212 | ) | $ | (7,946 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | 392,862 |
| $ | 364,704 |
|
| | EchoStar Technologies | Hughes | EchoStar Satellite Services | All Other and Eliminations | Consolidated Total | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | | |||||||||||
Net revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 1,715,579 | $ | 1,215,783 | $ | 326,828 | $ | 24,262 | $ | 3,282,452 | ||||||
Intersegment revenue | $ | 412 | $ | 2,343 | $ | 3,349 | $ | (6,104 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,715,991 | $ | 1,218,126 | $ | 330,177 | $ | 18,158 | $ | 3,282,452 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 56,935 | $ | 186,561 | $ | 12,700 | $ | 135,677 | $ | 391,873 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 136,057 | $ | 281,513 | $ | 235,993 | $ | (3,466 | ) | $ | 650,097 | |||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 1,658,203 | $ | 1,156,590 | $ | 275,280 | $ | 31,631 | $ | 3,121,704 | ||||||
Intersegment revenue | $ | 1,826 | $ | 2,124 | $ | 2,705 | $ | (6,655 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,660,029 | $ | 1,158,714 | $ | 277,985 | $ | 24,976 | $ | 3,121,704 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 69,809 | $ | 292,222 | $ | 118,998 | $ | 31,976 | $ | 513,005 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 110,933 | $ | 265,756 | $ | 212,549 | $ | 204,660 | $ | 793,898 | ||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue: | ||||||||||||||||
External revenue | $ | 1,780,491 | $ | 675,586 | $ | 277,707 | $ | 27,647 | $ | 2,761,431 | ||||||
Intersegment revenue | $ | 151 | $ | 636 | $ | 418 | $ | (1,205 | ) | $ | — | |||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,780,642 | $ | 676,222 | $ | 278,125 | $ | 26,442 | $ | 2,761,431 | ||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 81,420 | $ | 156,768 | $ | 119,004 | $ | 19,980 | $ | 377,172 | ||||||
EBITDA | $ | 144,753 | $ | 167,100 | $ | 197,848 | $ | (26,895 | ) | $ | 482,806 | |||||
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
EBITDA | $ | 650,097 | $ | 793,898 | $ | 482,806 | ||||
Interest income and expense, net | (177,898 | ) | (141,853 | ) | �� | (71,772 | ) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | (507,111 | ) | (457,326 | ) | (385,894 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 876 | (35 | ) | 635 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (34,036 | ) | $ | 194,684 | $ | 25,775 | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) EBITDA is not a measure determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for operating income, net income or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Conceptually, EBITDA measures the amount of income generated each period that could be used to service debt, pay taxes and fund capital expenditures. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used by our management as a measure of operating efficiency and overall financial performance for benchmarking against our peers and competitors. Management believes EBITDA provides meaningful supplemental information regarding liquidity and the underlying operating performance of our business. Management also believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industries.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Geographic Information and Transactions with Major Customers
Geographic Information. Revenues areRevenue is attributed to geographic regions based upon the location where the goods and services are provided. North AmericanAmerica revenue includes transactions with North AmericanAmerica customers. All other revenue includes transactions with customers in Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
South America, and the Middle East. The following table summarizes total long-lived assets and revenue attributed to the North AmericanAmerica and other foreign locations.
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-lived assets: | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
North America: | |||||||
United States | $ | 3,745,403 | $ | 3,921,385 | |||
Other | 947 | 40 | |||||
All other | 150,139 | 108,991 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 3,896,489 | $ | 4,030,416 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
| As of December 31, |
| |||||||
Long-lived assets, including FCC authorizations: |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
North America |
| $ | 3,888,286 |
| $ | 1,457,208 |
| $ | 1,411,292 |
|
All other |
| 34,540 |
| 41,356 |
| 43,516 |
| |||
Total |
| $ | 3,922,826 |
| $ | 1,498,564 |
| $ | 1,454,808 |
|
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
Revenue: |
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
North America |
| $ | 2,545,558 |
| $ | 2,302,901 |
| $ | 1,845,839 |
|
All other |
| 215,873 |
| 47,468 |
| 57,720 |
| |||
Total |
| $ | 2,761,431 |
| $ | 2,350,369 |
| $ | 1,903,559 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue: | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
North America: | ||||||||||
United States | $ | 2,819,968 | $ | 2,403,976 | $ | 2,229,498 | ||||
Other | 215,787 | 360,590 | 316,060 | |||||||
All other | 246,697 | 357,138 | 215,873 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | $ | 3,282,452 | $ | 3,121,704 | $ | 2,761,431 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Transactions with Major Customers. DuringFor the years ended December 31, 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 2009,2011, our revenue included sales to two major customers. The following table summarizes sales to each customer and its percentage of total revenue.
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Total revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
DISH Network |
| $ | 1,654,929 |
| $ | 1,938,572 |
| $ | 1,547,989 |
|
Bell TV |
| 218,329 |
| 202,424 |
| 200,601 |
| |||
All other |
| 888,173 |
| 209,373 |
| 154,969 |
| |||
Total revenue |
| $ | 2,761,431 |
| $ | 2,350,369 |
| $ | 1,903,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Percentage of total revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
DISH Network |
| 59.9 | % | 82.5 | % | 81.3 | % | |||
Bell TV |
| 7.9 | % | 8.6 | % | 10.5 | % | |||
All other |
| 32.2 | % | 8.9 | % | 8.2 | % | |||
F-51
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Total revenue: | ||||||||||
DISH Network: | ||||||||||
EchoStar Technologies segment | $ | 1,546,051 | $ | 1,277,038 | $ | 1,413,940 | ||||
Hughes segment | 113,869 | 34,017 | 1,854 | |||||||
EchoStar Satellite Services segment | 247,174 | 201,300 | 215,741 | |||||||
All Other and Eliminations | 24,541 | 31,409 | 23,394 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total DISH Network | 1,931,635 | 1,543,764 | 1,654,929 | |||||||
Bell TV (EchoStar Technologies segment) | 77,475 | 222,038 | 218,329 | |||||||
All other | 1,273,342 | 1,355,902 | 888,173 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | $ | 3,282,452 | $ | 3,121,704 | $ | 2,761,431 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Percentage of total revenue: | ||||||||||
DISH Network | 58.8 | % | 49.5 | % | 59.9 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Bell TV | 2.4 | % | 7.1 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
All other | 38.8 | % | 43.4 | % | 32.2 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
16.Note 18. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Our quarterly results of operations are summarized as follows:
|
| For the Three Months Ended |
| ||||||||||
|
| March 31 |
| June 30 |
| September 30 |
| December 31 |
| ||||
|
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
| ||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 479,826 |
| $ | 584,233 |
| $ | 863,163 |
| $ | 834,209 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
| 10,848 |
| 45,821 |
| 22,266 |
| 1,903 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| 17,164 |
| 18,482 |
| (19,117 | ) | (12,890 | ) | ||||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.20 |
| $ | 0.21 |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.19 |
| $ | 0.21 |
| $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Year ended December 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total revenue |
| $ | 627,080 |
| $ | 603,049 |
| $ | 607,040 |
| $ | 513,200 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
| 40,766 |
| 31,313 |
| 38,603 |
| 31,643 |
| ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar |
| 71,746 |
| (41,477 | ) | 5,151 |
| 168,938 |
| ||||
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.85 |
| $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.98 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to EchoStar |
| $ | 0.84 |
| $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | 0.06 |
| $ | 1.98 |
|
| | For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | March 31 | June 30 | September 30 | December 31 | |||||||||
| | (In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, 2013: | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 795,454 | $ | 830,003 | $ | 848,908 | $ | 808,087 | |||||
Operating income | $ | 23,936 | $ | 6,088 | $ | 40,904 | $ | 32,659 | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to EchoStar | $ | 3,458 | $ | (9,759 | ) | $ | 4,320 | $ | 4,506 | ||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Year ended December 31, 2012: | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 764,780 | $ | 806,004 | $ | 764,721 | $ | 786,199 | |||||
Operating income | $ | 29,410 | $ | 45,933 | $ | 23,880 | $ | 663 | |||||
Net income attributable to EchoStar | $ | 126,588 | $ | 35,682 | $ | 22,554 | $ | 26,224 | |||||
Basic EPS | $ | 1.46 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.29 | |||||
Diluted EPS | $ | 1.45 | $ | 0.41 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.28 | |||||
For the quarter ended December 31, 2013, our operating results included (i) $7.8 million in non-operating interest income and gains in connection with the settlement of certain accounts receivable and (ii) a goodwill impairment charge of $3.8 million.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2012, our operating results included (i) a $28.5 million nonrecurring dividend from a strategic investment and (ii) $32.8 million in impairment charges for certain of our goodwill and intangible assets.
17.Note 19. Related Party Transactions
DISH Network
Following the Spin-off, we and DISH Network have operated as separate public companies and DISH Network has no ownership interest in us. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, orand by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.
WeIn connection with and following the Spin-off, we and DISH Network have entered into certain agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain products, services and rights from DISH Network,Network; DISH Network obtains certain products, services and rights from us,us; and we and DISH Network have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses. We also may enter into additional agreements with DISH Network in the future.
Generally, the prices chargedamounts DISH Network pays for products and services provided under the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off are based on our cost plus a fixed margin (unless noted differently below), which varies depending on the nature of the products and services provided.
The following is a summary of the terms of theour principal agreements that we have entered into with DISH Network that may have an impact on our financial position and results of operations.
“Equipment revenue — DISH Network”
Receiver Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we and DISH Network entered into a receiver agreement pursuant to which DISH Network had the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes and related accessories, and other equipment from us for a period ending on January 1, 2012 (the “Prior Receiver Agreement”). The Prior Receiver Agreement allowed DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from us at our cost plus a fixed percentage margin, which varied depending on the nature of the equipment purchased. Additionally, we provided DISH Network with standard manufacturer warranties for the
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
"Equipment revenue—DISH Network"
goods sold under the Prior Receiver Agreement. DISH Network was able to terminate the Prior Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us. We were able to terminate the Prior Receiver Agreement if certain entities were to acquire DISH Network. The Prior Receiver Agreement also included an indemnification provision, whereby the parties indemnified each other for certain intellectual property matters.
Effective January 1, 2012, we and DISH Network entered into a newreceiver agreement (the “2012"2012 Receiver Agreement”Agreement"), pursuant to which DISH Network continues to havehas the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from us for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. DISH Network has an option, but not the obligation, to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term. The material terms of the 2012 Receiver Agreement are substantially the same as the material terms of the Prior Receiver Agreement, except that the 2012 Receiver Agreement allows DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from us either: (i) at a cost (decreasing as we reduce costs and increasing as costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on our mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased. Under the 2012 Receiver Agreement, our margins will be increased if we are able to reduce the costs of our digital set-top boxes and our margins will be impairedreduced if these costs increase. AtWe provide DISH Network with standard manufacturer warranties for the commencement ofgoods sold under the 2012 Receiver Agreement. Additionally, the 2012 Receiver Agreement includes an indemnification provision, whereby the aggregate pricingparties indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters. DISH Network is able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us. We are able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement if certain entities acquire DISH Network. DISH Network has an option, but not the obligation, to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term.
In connection with the Spin-off, we and DISH Network entered into a receiver agreement pursuant to which DISH Network had the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes and related accessories, and other equipment from us for a period that ended on January 1, 2012 (the "Prior Receiver Agreement"). The Prior Receiver Agreement allowed DISH Network to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment sold underfrom us at our cost plus a fixed percentage margin, which varied depending on the 2012 Receiver Agreement was substantiallynature of the same as the aggregate pricingequipment purchased. Additionally, we provided DISH Network with standard manufacturer warranties for the products and equipmentgoods sold under the Prior Receiver Agreement. DISH Network was able to terminate the Prior Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us. We were able to terminate the time of its expiration. There can be no assurance that, overPrior Receiver Agreement if certain entities were to acquire DISH Network. The Prior Receiver Agreement also included an indemnification provision, whereby the long term, aggregate pricingparties indemnified each other for certain intellectual property matters.
"Services and other revenue—DISH Network"
Broadcast Agreement. Effective January 1, 2012, we and DISH Network entered into a new broadcast agreement (the "2012 Broadcast Agreement") pursuant to which we provide certain broadcast services to DISH Network, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services, for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. The fees for the services provided under the 2012 ReceiverBroadcast Agreement are calculated at either: (a) our cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed dollar fee, which is subject to certain adjustments; or (b) our cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will be substantiallydepend on the same as it wasnature of the services provided. DISH Network has the ability to terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon at least 60 days notice to us. If DISH Network terminates the teleport services provided under the Prior Receiver Agreement.2012 Broadcast Agreement for a reason other than our breach, DISH Network generally is obligated to reimburse us for any direct costs we incur related to any such termination that we cannot reasonably mitigate.
“Services and other revenue — DISH Network”
Broadcast Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we and DISH Network entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which we provided certain broadcast services to DISH Network, including teleport services such as
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services for a period endingthat ended on January 1, 2012 (the “Prior"Prior Broadcast Agreement”Agreement"). DISH Network had the ability to terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon at least 60 days notice to us. If DISH Network terminated teleport services for a reason other than our breach, DISH Network was obligated to pay us the aggregate amount of the remainder of the expected cost of providing the teleport services. The fees for the services provided under the Prior Broadcast Agreement were calculated at cost plus a fixed margin, which varied depending on the nature of the products and services provided.
Effective January 1, 2012, we and DISH Network entered into a new broadcast agreement (the “2012 Broadcast Agreement”) pursuant to which we will continue to provide broadcast services to DISH Network, for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. The material terms of the 2012 Broadcast Agreement are substantially the same as the material terms of the Prior Broadcast Agreement, except that: (i) the fees for services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement are calculated at either: (a) our cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed dollar fee, which is subject to certain adjustments; or (b) our cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided; and (ii) if DISH Network terminates the teleport services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement for a reason other than our breach, DISH Network is generally obligated to reimburse us for any direct costs we incur related to any such termination that we cannot reasonably mitigate. At the commencement of the 2012 Broadcast Agreement the aggregate pricing for the services provided thereunder was substantially the same as the aggregate pricing for the services provided under the Prior Broadcast Agreement at the time of its expiration. There can be no assurance that, over the long term, aggregate pricing under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement will be substantially the same as it was under the Prior Broadcast Agreement.
Broadcast Agreement for Certain Sports Related Programming.During May 2010, we and DISH Network entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which we provide certain broadcast services to DISH Network in connection with its carriage of certain sports related programming. The term of this agreement is for ten years. If DISH Network terminates this agreement for a reason other than our breach, DISH Network generally is generally obligated to
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
reimburse us for any direct costs we incur related to any such termination that we cannot reasonably mitigate. The fees for the broadcast services provided under this agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and provide such services.
Satellite Capacity Agreements. Leased to DISH Network. Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which DISH Network leases satellite capacity on certain satellites owned or leased by us. The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each lease is set forth below:
EchoStar III, VI, VIII and XII.DISH Network leases certain satellite capacity from us on EchoStar VI, VIII and XII. The leases for EchoStar VI, VIII and XII generally terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life or replacement of the satellite (unless, in the case of EchoStar VI or XII, DISH Network determines to renew on a year-to-year basis); (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponders on which service is being provided fails;fail; or (iv) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite, whether the replacement satellite fails at launch or in orbit prior to being placed into service, and the exercise of certain renewal options. DISH Network generally has the option to renew eachthe lease of EchoStar VI or XII on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’ssatellite's life. There can be no assurance that any optionsoption to renew such agreementsagreement will be exercised. In August 2010,Beginning in the first quarter of 2013, the leases for the EchoStar VI and VIII satellites expired in accordance with their terms; DISH Network’sNetwork no longer leases capacity from us on the EchoStar VI satellite however, in May 2013, DISH Network began leasing capacity from us on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare. Effective March 1, 2014 this lease of EchoStar III terminated when it was replaced by EchoStar XV, which is owned by DISH Network.will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the right to terminate this lease with 30 days notice.
EchoStar IXIX. . DISH Network leases certain satellite capacity from us on EchoStar IX. Subject to availability, DISH Network generally has the right to continue to lease satellite capacity from us on EchoStar IX on a month-to-month basis.
EchoStar XVI.During December 2009, we entered into an initial ten-year transponder service agreement with DISH Network willto lease certain satellite capacity from us all of the capacity onEchoStar XVI, after itsa DBS satellite. EchoStar XVI was launched in November 2012 and placed at the 61.5 degree orbital location. Under the original transponder service commencement date, and this leaseagreement, the initial term generally terminatesexpired upon the earlier of: (i) the endend-of-life or replacement of lifethe satellite; (ii) the date the satellite failed; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement failed; or (iv) ten years following the actual service commencement date. Effective December 21, 2012, we
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
and DISH Network amended the transponder service agreement to, among other things, change the initial term to generally expire upon the earlier of: (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) tenfour years following the actual service commencement date. UponPrior to expiration of the initial term, we, upon certain conditions, and DISH Network have the option to renew for an additional six-year period. If either we or DISH Network exercise our respective six-year renewal options, DISH Network has the option to renew on a year-to-year basis through the end of lifefor an additional five-year period prior to expiration of the satellite.then-current term. There can be no assurance that any optionsoption to renew this agreement will be exercised. We began to lease capacity on EchoStar XVI is expected to be launched during the second halfDISH Network in January 2013.
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction. On February 20, 2014, we entered into agreements with DISH Network to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, EchoStar and HSS will issue shares of 2012.
EchoStar XV. EchoStar XV ispreferred tracking stock to DISH Network in exchange for five satellites owned by DISH Network (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and is operated at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. The FCC has granted us an authorization to operate the satellite at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location. For so long as EchoStar XV remainsXIV) (including related in-orbit incentive obligations and interest payments of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in service at the 61.5 degree west longitude orbital location,cash; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, DISH Network is obligated to pay uswill lease certain satellite capacity on these five satellites (collectively, the "Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction"). See Note 20 for a fee for the usediscussion of the orbital slot which varies depending on the number of frequencies being used by EchoStar XV.our subsequent events.
Nimiq 5 Agreement.During 2009, we entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Telesat Canada (“Telesat”("Telesat") to receive service on all 32 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7 degree west longitude orbital location (the “Telesat"Telesat Transponder Agreement”Agreement"). During 2009, DISH Networkwe also entered into a satellite service agreement (the “DISH Telesat Agreement”"DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement") with us,DISH Network, pursuant to which they receive serviceDISH Network leases from us on all 32 of the DBS transponders covered by the Telesat Transponder Agreement.
Under the terms of the DISH TelesatNimiq 5 Agreement, DISH Network makes certain monthly payments to us that commenced in OctoberSeptember 2009 when the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service and continue through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH TelesatNimiq 5 Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the date it was placed into service. Upon expiration of the initial term, DISH Network has the option to renew the DISH TelesatNimiq 5 Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end of life of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH Network has certain rights to receive service from us on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that any
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
options to renew this agreementthe DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement will be exercised or that DISH Network will exercise its option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
QuetzSat-1 Agreement. During 2008, we entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America, which provides, among other things, for the provision by SES Latin America to us of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite. This satelliteConcurrently, in 2008, we entered into a transponder service agreement with DISH Network, pursuant to which DISH Network leases 24 of the DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1. QuetzSat-1 was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2011 at the 67.1 degree west longitude orbital location while we and DISH Network explore alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite.location. In the interim, we are providingprovided DISH Network with alternate capacity at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location. We commenced payments under ourDuring the third quarter of 2012, we and DISH Network entered into an agreement with SES uponpursuant to which we sublease back from DISH Network five of the placement of24 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite atleased to DISH Network. In January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was moved to the 67.177 degree west
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
longitude orbital location. During 2008, we also entered into a transponder service agreement withlocation and DISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network will receive service from us on 24 of the DBS transponders on QuetzSat-1, which will replace certain other transponders leased from us.
commenced commercial operations at such location in February 2013.
Under the terms of our contractual arrangements with DISH Network, we will recognize revenue forbegan to provide service to DISH Network on the QuetzSat-1 satellite when it is placed intoin February 2013 and will continue to provide service at the 77 degree west longitude orbital location and continuing through the remainder of the service term. Unless extended or earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of our agreement with DISH Network for the QuetzSat-1 satellite, the initial service term will expire in November 2021. Upon expiration of the initial service term, DISH Network has the option to renew the agreement for the QuetzSat-1 satellite on a year-to-year basis through the end of life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite. Upon an in-orbit failure or end of life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH Network has certain rights to receive service from us on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised or that DISH Network will exercise its option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
103 Degree Orbital Location/SES-3. During May 2012, we entered into a spectrum development agreement (the "103 Spectrum Development Agreement") with Ciel Satellite Holdings Inc. ("Ciel") to develop certain spectrum rights at the 103 degree west longitude orbital location (the "103 Spectrum Rights"). During June 2013, we and DISH Network entered into a spectrum development agreement (the "DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement") pursuant to which DISH Network may use and develop the 103 Spectrum Rights. During the third quarter 2013, DISH Network made a payment to us in exchange for these rights. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, the term generally will continue for the duration of the 103 Spectrum Rights Agreement.
In connection with the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, during May 2012, we also entered into a ten-year service agreement with Ciel pursuant to which we lease certain satellite capacity from Ciel on the SES-3 satellite at the 103 degree orbital location (the "103 Service Agreement"). During June 2013, we and DISH Network entered into an agreement pursuant to which DISH Network leases certain satellite capacity from us on the SES-3 satellite (the "DISH 103 Service Agreement"). Under the terms of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, DISH Network makes certain monthly payments to us through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, the initial service term will expire on the earlier of: (i) the date the SES-3 satellite fails; (ii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement fails; or (iii) ten years following the actual service commencement date. Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the SES-3 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, DISH Network has certain rights to receive service from us on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that DISH Network will exercise its option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
TT&C Agreement. Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a telemetry, tracking and control ("TT&C") agreement pursuant to which we provide TT&C services to DISH Network and its subsidiaries for a period ending on December 31, 2016 (the "2012 TT&C Agreement"). The fees for services provided under the 2012 TT&C Agreement are calculated at either: (i) a fixed fee or (ii) cost plus a fixed margin, which will vary depending on the nature of the services provided. DISH Network is able to terminate the 2012 TT&C Agreement for any reason upon 60 days notice.
In connection with the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction, on February 20, 2014, we amended the TT&C Agreement to cease the provision of TT&C services to DISH Network for the EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV satellites. See Note 20 for a discussion of our subsequent events.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (“("TT&C”&C") agreement pursuant to which we provided TT&C services to DISH Network for a period endingthat ended on January 1, 2012 (the “Prior"Prior TT&C Agreement”Agreement"). The fees for services provided under the Prior TT&C Agreement were calculated at cost plus a fixed margin. DISH Network was able to terminate the Prior TT&C Agreement for any reason upon 60 days notice.
On January 1, 2012, we entered into a TT&C agreement pursuant to which we will continue to provide TT&C services to DISH Network and its subsidiaries for a period ending on December 31, 2016 (the “2012 TT&C Agreement”). The material terms of the 2012 TT&C Agreement are substantially the same as the material terms of the Prior TT&C Agreement, except that the fees for services provided under the 2012 TT&C Agreement are calculated at either: (i) a fixed fee; or (ii) cost plus a fixed margin, which will vary depending on the nature of the services provided.
Real Estate Lease Agreements.We have entered into lease agreements pursuant to which DISH Network leases certain real estate from us. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area at the time of the lease, and DISH Network is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth below:
Inverness Lease Agreement. In November 2011, we and DISH Network extended theThe lease for certain space at 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016. This agreement can be terminated by either party upon six months prior notice.
Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for all of 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Santa Fe Lease Agreement. In November 2011, we and DISH Network extended theThe lease for all of 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016 with a renewal option for one additional year.
EchoStar Data Networks Sublease AgreementAgreement. . The sublease for certain space at 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta, Georgia is for a period ending on October 31, 2016.
Gilbert Lease Agreement.The lease for certain space at 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert, Arizona is a month to month lease and can be terminated by either party upon 30 days prior notice.
Cheyenne Lease Agreement. Effective January 1, 2012, we and DISH Network entered into aThe lease for certain space at 530 EchoStar Drive in Cheyenne, Wyoming is for a period ending on December 31, 2031.
Product Support AgreementAgreement.. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to receive product support from us (including certain engineering and technical support services) for all set-top boxes and related components that our subsidiaries have previously sold and in the future may sell to DISH Network. The fees for the services provided under the product support agreement are calculated at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of such receiversset-top boxes and related components, unless terminated earlier. DISH Network may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice. In the event of an early termination of this agreement, DISH Network shall beis entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to us for the services.
DISHOnline.com Services Agreement.Effective January 1, 2010, DISH Network entered into a two-year agreement with us pursuant to which DISH Network will receivereceives certain services associated with an online video portal. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. DISH Network has the option to renew this agreement for three successive one year terms and the agreement may be terminated by DISH Network for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to us. In November 2011,2013, DISH Network exercised its right to renew this agreement for a one-year period ending on December 31, 2012.2014.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
DISH Remote Access Services Agreement. Effective February 23, 2010, DISH Networkwe entered into an agreement with usDISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network will receive,receives, among other things, certain remote DVRdigital video recorder ("DVR") management services. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. This agreement has a term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms and may be terminated by DISH Network for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to us.
SlingService Services Agreement. Effective February 23, 2010, DISH Networkwe entered into an agreement with usDISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network will receivereceives certain place-shifting services.services related to placeshifting. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. This agreement has a term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms and may be terminated by DISH Network for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to us.
Move Networks Services Agreement.Blockbuster Agreements. In the fourth quarter 2011, we granted DISH Network the right to use Move Network’s software and video publishing systems, which facilitate the streaming, downloading and distribution of audio and video content to set-top boxes via the Internet. The fees for the services provided under this agreement are based upon a fixed fee which varies based upon the number of set-top boxes in a given month that access Move Network’s software. This agreement has a term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms and may be terminated by DISH Network for any reason upon at least 180 days notice to us.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
International Programming Rights Agreement. DISH Network purchased certain international rights for sporting events from us during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, of which we only retain a certain portion. During the year ended December 31, 2011, DISH Network did not purchase any international rights for sporting events from us.
Blockbuster. On April 26, 2011, DISH Network acquired substantially all of the assets of Blockbuster, Inc. (the “Blockbuster Acquisition”"Blockbuster Acquisition"). On August 5,June 8, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Hughes Acquisition"). Hughes Network Systems, LLC ("HNS"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hughes Communications, Inc., provided certain broadband products and services to Blockbuster pursuant to an agreement that was entered into prior to the Blockbuster Acquisition and the Hughes Acquisition. Subsequent to both the Blockbuster Acquisition and the Hughes Acquisition, Blockbuster entered into a letternew agreement with HNS pursuant to which Blockbuster may continue to purchase broadband products and services from our Hughes segment (the "Blockbuster VSAT Agreement"). The term of the Blockbuster VSAT Agreement is through October 31, 2014 and Blockbuster has the option to renew the agreement for an additional one year period.
In connection with the closing of all of the Blockbuster retail locations, we received a notice in November 2013 that, effective February 1, 2014, all services to all Blockbuster locations, including Blockbuster franchisee locations, would be terminated.
Radio Access Network Agreement. On November 29, 2012, HNS entered into an agreement with DISH Network L.L.C. pursuant to which HNS will construct for DISH Network a ground-based satellite radio access network ("RAN") for a fixed fee. The completion of the RAN under this agreement is expected to occur on or before November 29, 2014. This agreement generally may be terminated by DISH Network at any time for convenience.
RUS Implementation Agreement. In September 2010, DISH Broadband L.L.C. ("DISH Broadband"), DISH Network's wholly owned subsidiary, was selected by the Rural Utilities Service ("RUS") of the United States Department of Agriculture to receive up to approximately $14.1 million in broadband stimulus grant funds (the "Grant Funds"). Effective November 2011, HNS and DISH Broadband entered into a RUS Implementation Agreement (the "RUS Agreement") pursuant to which HNS provides certain assetsportions of the equipment and broadband service used to implement DISH Broadband's RUS program. The initial term of the RUS Agreement continues until the earlier of: (i) September 24, 2013; or (ii) the date that the Grant Funds have been exhausted. In addition, DISH Broadband may terminate the RUS Agreement for convenience upon 45 days prior written notice to HNS. The RUS Agreement expired in June 2013 when the Grant Funds were exhausted.
TerreStar Agreement. On March 9, 2012, DISH Network completed its acquisition of substantially all the assets of TerreStar. Prior to DISH Network's acquisition of substantially all the assets of TerreStar and our completion of the Hughes Acquisition, TerreStar and HNS entered into various agreements
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
pursuant to which our Hughes segment provides, among other things, hosting, operations and maintenance services for TerreStar's satellite gateway and associated ground infrastructure. These agreements generally may be terminated by DISH Network at any time for convenience.
Hughes Broadband Distribution Agreement. Effective October 1, 2012, HNS and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. ("dishNET"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, entered into a distribution agreement (the "Distribution Agreement") pursuant to which dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to market, sell and distribute the Hughes satellite internet service (the "Hughes service"). dishNET pays HNS a monthly per subscriber wholesale service fee for the Hughes service based upon a subscriber's service level, and, beginning January 1, 2014, based upon certain volume subscription thresholds. The Distribution Agreement also provides that dishNET has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase certain broadband equipment from us to support DISH Network’s Blockbuster business (“Blockbuster”) website were transferred to us and we agreedthe sale of the Hughes service. The Distribution Agreement has a five year term with automatic renewal for successive one year terms unless terminated by either party with a written notice at least 180 days before the expiration of the then-current term. Upon expiration or termination of the Distribution Agreement, the parties will continue to provide the Hughes service to the then-current dishNET subscribers pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Distribution Agreement. As part of the Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction, on February 20, 2014, Hughes and dishNET entered into an amendment to the Distribution Agreement which will, among other things, extend the initial term of the Distribution Agreement through March 1, 2024. See Note 20 for a discussion of our subsequent events.
Set-Top Box Application Development Agreement. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we and DISH Network entered into a set-top box application development agreement (the "Application Development Agreement") pursuant to which we provide DISH Network with certain technical and infrastructure supportservices relating to the development of web-based applications for the Blockbuster website.period ending February 1, 2015. The Application Development Agreement renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by us or DISH Network at any time upon at least 90 days notice. The fees for services provided under the Application Development Agreement are calculated at our cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.
XiP Encryption Agreement. During the third quarter of 2012, we entered into an encryption agreement with DISH Network for our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes (the "XiP Encryption Agreement") pursuant to which we provide certain security measures on our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes to encrypt the content delivered to the set-top box via a smart card and secure the content between set-top boxes. The term of the XiP Encryption Agreement is until December 31, 2014. Under the XiP Encryption Agreement, DISH Network has an option, but not the obligation to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year upon at least 180 days notice prior to the end of the term. We and DISH Network each have the right to terminate the XiP Encryption Agreement for any reason upon at least 180 days' notice and 30 days' notice, respectively. The fees for the services provided under the letter agreementXiP Encryption Agreement are calculated at cost pluson a fixed margin, which varies depending uponmonthly basis based on the naturenumber of the services provided. The letter agreement provides that it shall continue in effect until the completion of a definitive agreement between DISH Network and us setting forth the terms of our support of the Blockbuster website.receivers utilizing such security measures each month.
“"General and administrative expenses — expenses—DISH Network”Network"
Management Services AgreementAgreement.. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a Management Services Agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which DISH Network makesmade certain of its officers available to provide services (which arewere primarily legal and accounting services) to us. Specifically, Paul W. Orban remains employed by DISH Network, but also serves as our Senior Vice President and Controller. In addition, R. Stanton Dodge also served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary through November 2011.The Management Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2013 for an additional one-year period until
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
January 1, 2014. Effective June 15, 2013, we terminated the Management Services Agreement. We makemade payments to DISH Network based upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses incurred by DISH Network with respect to such DISH Network officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits). These allocations arewere based upon the estimated percentages of time to be spent by the DISH Network executive officers performing services for us under the Management Services Agreement. We also reimbursereimbursed DISH Network for direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by DISH Network for management services provided to us. We and DISH Network evaluateevaluated all charges for reasonableness at least annually and makemade any adjustments to these charges as we and DISH Network mutually agreeagreed upon.
The Management Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2012 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2013 and renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier: (i) by us at any time upon at least 30 days notice; (ii) by DISH Network at the end of any renewal term, upon at least 180 days notice; or (iii) by DISH Network upon notice to us, following certain changes in control.
Real Estate Lease Agreement. During 2008, we entered into a sublease for space at 185 Varick Street, New York, New York from DISH Network for a period of approximately seven years. The rent on a per square foot basis for this sublease was comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area at the time of the sublease, and we are responsible for our portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises.
Professional Services Agreement.Prior to 2010, in In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into various agreements with DISH Network including the Transition Services Agreement, Satellite Procurement Agreement and Services Agreement, which all expired on January 1, 2010 and were replaced by a Professional Services Agreement. During 2009,we and DISH Network agreed that we shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network, the following services, among others, certain of which were previously provided under the Transition Services Agreement: information technology, travel and event coordination, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, benefits administration, program acquisition services and other support services. Additionally, we and DISH Network agreed that DISH Network shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage us to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network (previously provided under the Satellite Procurement Agreement) and, receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from us (previously provided under the Services Agreement). and other support services. The Professional Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
2012 2014 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2013 and renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by either party upon at least 60 days notice. However, either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement in part with respect to any particular service it receives for any reason upon at least 30 daysdays' notice.
Real Estate Lease Agreements.Other Agreements — Since the Spin-off, we have entered into lease agreements pursuant to which we lease certain real estate from DISH Network. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area at the time of the lease, and we are responsible for our portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth below:
El Paso Lease Agreement. During 2012, we leased certain space at 1285 Joe Battle Blvd., El Paso, Texas from DISH Network for a period ending on August 1, 2015, which also provides us with renewal options for four consecutive three year terms.
American Fork Occupancy License Agreement. The license for certain space at 796 East Utah Valley Drive in American Fork, Utah is for a period ending on July 31, 2017, subject to the terms of the underlying lease agreement.
Other Agreements—DISH Network
Satellite Capacity Leased from DISH Network. During 2009,Since the Spin-off, we entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which we acquire certain satellite capacity from DISH Network on certain satellites owned or leased by DISH Network. The fees for the services provided under these
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each satellite capacity agreement is set forth below:
D-1. In November 2012, HNS entered into a satellite capacity agreement pursuant to which we leaseHNS leases certain satellite capacity from DISH Network on EchoStar I. The feethe D-1 satellite for the services provided under this satellite capacityresearch and development. This service agreement depends, among other things, upon the orbital location of the satellite and the length of the lease. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 the amount of those fees included in “Cost of sales — services and other” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) was approximately $22 million and $19 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not lease satellite capacity from DISH Network on EchoStar I. The lease generally terminates upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life or replacementend-of-life of the satellite (unless we determine to renew on a year-to-year basis);satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponderspectrum capacity on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) a certain date, which depends, among other things, upon the estimated useful life ofJune 30, 2014.
EchoStar XV. In May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity from DISH Network on EchoStar XV and relocated the satellite whetherto the replacement satellite fails at launch or in orbit prior45 degree west longitude orbital location for testing pursuant to being placed into service, and the exercise of certain renewal options. We generallyour Brazilian authorization. Effective March 1, 2014, this lease will be converted to a month-to-month lease. Both parties have the optionright to renewterminate this lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the satellite’s life. There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.with 30 days notice.
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with DISH Network pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and related components from DISH Network at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased. In November 2011,2013, we and EchoStarDISH Network extended this agreement until December 31, 2012.2014. We may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to DISH Network. DISH Network may also terminate this agreement if certain entities acquire it. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we purchasedOur purchase of remanufactured receivers and related components from DISH Network for an aggregate amount of less than $1 million, $3was minimal, $3.5 million and $7$0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Tax Sharing Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a tax sharing agreement with DISH Network which governs our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, are borne by DISH Network, and DISH Network will indemnify us for such taxes. However, DISH Network is not liable for and will not indemnify us for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended because of: (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of our stock, stock options or assets; (ii) any action that we take or fail to take; or (iii) any action that we take that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the IRS in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain related transactions. In such case, we will be solely liable for, and will indemnify DISH Network for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement will only terminate after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations, including extensions, or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.
In light of the tax sharing agreement, among other things, and in connection with our consolidated federal income tax returns for certain tax years prior to and for the year of the Spin-off, during the third quarter of 2013, we and DISH Network agreed upon a supplemental allocation of the tax benefits arising from certain tax items resolved in the course of the IRS's examination of our consolidated tax returns. Prior to the agreement with DISH Network, the federal tax benefits of $82.8 million were reflected as a deferred tax asset for depreciation and amortization, which was netted in our noncurrent deferred tax liabilities. The agreement requires DISH Network to pay us $82.8 million of the federal tax benefit it receives at such time as we would have otherwise been able to realize such tax benefit,
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
which we currently estimate would be after 2014. Accordingly, we recorded a noncurrent receivable from DISH Network for $82.8 million in "Other receivable—DISH Network" and a corresponding increase in our net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities to reflect the effects of this agreement in the third quarter of 2013. In addition, during the third quarter of 2013, we and DISH Network agreed upon a tax sharing arrangement for filing certain combined state income tax returns and a method of allocating the respective tax liabilities between us and DISH Network for such combined returns, through the taxable period ending on December 31, 2017.
TiVo. On April 29, 2011, we and DISH Network entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo, Inc. See Note 14 for further discussion.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Launch Service. During 2009, we assigned certain of our rights under a launch contract to DISH Network for its fair value of $103 million. We recorded the assignment of these rights at our net book value of $89 million and recorded the $14 million difference("TiVo"). The settlement resolved all pending litigation between our net book value and DISH Network’s purchase price as a capital transaction with DISH Network. The $103 million was received in the first quarter of 2010.
Weather Related Programming Agreement. During May 2010, weus and DISH Network, entered into anon the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH Network DVRs.
Under the settlement agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, we agreed to develop certain weather related programmingall pending litigation has been dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by us or DISH Network have been dissolved. We and DISH Network received the rightare jointly responsible for making payments to distribute such programming. This agreement was terminated during June 2010. In July 2010, we sold our interestTiVo in the entity that was developing such weather related programmingaggregate amount of $500.0 million, including an initial payment of $300.0 million and the remaining $200.0 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for $5 million.
Acquisitionthe contribution from us totaling approximately $10.0 million, representing an allocation of Alta Wireless, Inc.liability relating to our sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer. Future payments will be allocated between us and Sale of South.com, L.L.C. During October 2010, we purchased an additional equity interest in Alta Wireless, Inc. from another party for $2.8 million. This transaction increased our ownership in Alta Wireless, Inc. from 49.9% to 95%. Alta Wireless Inc. holds certain authorizations for local multipoint distribution service spectrum in the United States. Additionally, during October 2010, we and the same counterparty sold our respective interests in South.com, L.L.C. to DISH Network based on historical sales of certain licensed products, with EchoStar being responsible for $2 million and $3 million, respectively. South.com, L.L.C. holds certain authorizations for multichannel video and data distribution service spectrum in the United States.5% of each annual payment.
Blockbuster. Hughes Communications provides broadband products and services to Blockbuster pursuant to an agreement (the “Blockbuster VSAT Agreement”) that was entered into prior to the Blockbuster Acquisition and our Hughes Acquisiton. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized $2 million of revenue from Blockbuster. As of December 31, 2011, we had a receivable balance of $1 million due from Blockbuster.
Patent Cross-License AgreementsAgreements.. During December 2011, we and DISH Network entered into separate patent cross-license agreements with the same third party whereby: (i) we and such third party licensed our respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions; and (ii) DISH Network and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions (each, a “Cross-License Agreement”"Cross-License Agreement"). Each Cross LicenseCross-License Agreement covers patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2017 and aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements total less than $10$10.0 million. Each Cross LicenseCross-License Agreement also contains an option to extend each Cross-License Agreement to include patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2022. If both options are exercised, the aggregate additional payments to such third party would total less than $3$3.0 million. However, we and DISH Network may elect to extend our respective Cross-License Agreement independentindependently of each other. Since the aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements were based on the combined annual revenuesrevenue of us and DISH Network, we and DISH Network agreed to allocate our respective payments to such third party based on our respective percentage of combined total revenue.
SprintVoom Settlement Agreement. On November 3, 2011, DISH Network and SprintOctober 21, 2012, we entered into the SprintVoom Settlement Agreement pursuant to which all disputed issueswith Voom and Cablevision, and for certain limited purposes, MSG Holdings, L.P., The Madison Square Garden Company and DISH Network. The Voom Settlement Agreement resolved the litigation between the parties relating to DISH Network’s acquisition of DBSD North America and the TerreStar Transaction were resolved between DISH Network and Sprint, including, but not limited to, issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by Sprint to relocate users from the spectrum now licensed to DBSD North America and TerreStar (the “Sprint Clearing Costs”).Voom programming services. We were a party to the SprintVoom Settlement Agreement solely for the purposes of executing a mutual release between usof claims with Voom, Cablevision, MSG Holdings, L.P. and Sprint relatingThe Madison Square Garden Company related to the Sprint Clearing Costs. As of December 31, 2011, we are currently a holder of certain TerreStar debt instruments. Pursuant to the terms of the Sprint Settlement Agreement, DISH Network made a net payment of approximately $114 million to Sprint.
F-59Voom programming services.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
DBSD North America Agreement. On March 9, 2012, DISH Network completed its acquisition of 100% of the equity of reorganized DBSD North America, Inc. ("DBSD North America"). Prior to DISH Network's acquisition of DBSD North America and our completion of the Hughes Acquisition, DBSD North America and HNS entered into an agreement pursuant to which our Hughes segment provides, among other things, hosting, operations and maintenance services of DBSD North America's satellite gateway and associated ground infrastructure. This agreement was renewed for a one-year period ending on February 15, 2014, and renews for three successive one-year periods unless terminated by DBSD North America upon at least 30 days' notice prior to the expiration of any renewal term.
DISH Digital Holding L.L.C. Effective July 1, 2012, we and DISH Network formed DISH Digital, which is owned two-thirds by DISH Network and one-third by EchoStar. DISH Digital was formed to develop and commercialize certain advanced technologies. We, DISH Network and DISH Digital entered into the following agreements with respect to DISH Digital: (i) a contribution agreement pursuant to which we and DISH Network contributed certain assets in exchange for our respective ownership interests in DISH Digital; (ii) a limited liability company operating agreement, which provides for the governance of DISH Digital; and (iii) a commercial agreement pursuant to which, among other things, DISH Digital has: (a) certain rights and corresponding obligations with respect to DISH Digital's business; and (b) the right, but not the obligation, to receive certain services from us and DISH Network, respectively. We account for our investment in DISH Digital using the equity method.
TerreStar-2 Development Agreement. In August 2013, we and DISH Network entered into a development agreement ("T2 Development Agreement") with respect to the TerreStar-2 ("T2") satellite under which we reimburse DISH Network for amounts it pays pursuant to an authorization to proceed ("T2 ATP") with SS/L, LLC in connection with the construction of the T2 satellite. In exchange, DISH Network granted us certain rights to purchase the T2 satellite during the term of the T2 Development Agreement. The T2 Development Agreement was amended in December 2013 to provide for the ability to purchase DISH Network's rights and obligations under the T2 ATP and the related agreement for the construction of the T2 satellite with SS/L. The T2 Development Agreement expires on the later of: (i) December 19, 2014, or (ii) the date on which the T2 ATP expires.
Other Agreements
In November 2009, Mr. Roger J. Lynch became employed by both us and DISH Network as Executive Vice President. Mr. Lynch is responsible for the development and implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both us and DISH Network. Mr. Lynch’sLynch's compensation consists of cash and equity compensation and is borne by both DISH Network and us.
Hughes Systique Corporation (“("Hughes Systique”Systique")
We contract with Hughes Systique for software development services. In addition to our 45%44.4% ownership in Hughes Systique, Mr. Pradman Kaul, the CEO and President of Hughes Communications, Inc. and a member of our Board of Directors and his brother, who is the CEO and President of Hughes Systique, in the aggregate, owned approximately 26%26.1%, on an undiluted basis, of Hughes Systique’sSystique's outstanding shares as of December 31, 2011.2013. Furthermore, Mr. Pradman Kaul serves on the board of directors of Hughes Systique. We are considered the “primary beneficiary”"primary beneficiary" of Hughes Systique due to, among other factors, our ability to significantly influence and direct the operating and financial decisions of Hughes Systique and asour obligation to provide financial support in the form of term loans.
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
As a result, we are required to consolidate Hughes Systique’s results of operationsSystique's financial statements in our operating results.Consolidated Financial Statements.
NagraStar L.L.C.
We own 50% of NagraStar L.L.C. (“NagraStar”("NagraStar"), a joint venture that is our primary provider of encryption and related security technology used in our set-top boxes. Although we do not consolidate NagraStar, we have the ability to significantly influence its operating policies; therefore, weWe account for our investment in NagraStar underusing the equity method of accounting.
method.
The table below summarizes our transactions with NagraStar.
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Purchases from NagraStar |
| $ | 16,771 |
| $ | 18,557 |
| $ | 31,165 |
|
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Purchases from NagraStar | $ | 14,901 | $ | 13,024 | $ | 16,771 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| As of December 31, |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
|
|
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
|
|
| ||||
Amounts payable to NagraStar |
| $ | 2,965 |
| $ | 799 |
|
|
|
Commitments to purchase from NagraStar |
| $ | 2,731 |
| $ | 4,934 |
|
|
|
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
Due to NagraStar | $ | 1,211 | $ | 2,694 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments to purchase from NagraStar | $ | 5,874 | $ | 7,303 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Dish Mexico
During 2008, we entered into a joint venture for a direct-to-home (“DTH”)DTH satellite service in Mexico known as Dish Mexico. Pursuant to these arrangements, we provide certain broadcast services and satellite capacity and sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and related equipment to Dish Mexico. We account for our investment in Dish Mexico using the equity method.
The following table summarizes services we provided to Dish Mexico that are not related to the original contribution commitment associated with our investment.
F-60
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| | (In thousands) | |||||||||
Digital set-top boxes and related accessories | $ | 36,929 | $ | 58,097 | $ | 62,964 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Satellite services | $ | 22,638 | $ | 13,320 | $ | 8,520 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Uplink services | $ | 6,735 | $ | 9,144 | $ | 8,137 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other services | $ | 127 | $ | 640 | $ | — | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
| | (In thousands) | ||||||
Due from Dish Mexico | $ | 3,506 | $ | 11,699 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - STATEMENTS—Continued
The following table summarizes our transactions with Dish Mexico.
|
| For the Years Ended December 31, |
| |||||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
| 2009 |
| |||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||
Sales not related to the original contribution commitment associated with our investment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Digital set-top boxes and related accessories |
| $ | 62,964 |
| $ | 80,910 |
| $ | 36,289 |
|
Sales of satellite services |
| $ | 8,520 |
| $ | 8,520 |
| $ | 8,300 |
|
Uplink services |
| $ | 8,137 |
| $ | 368 |
| $ | — |
|
|
| As of December 31, |
|
|
| ||||
|
| 2011 |
| 2010 |
|
|
| ||
|
| (In thousands) |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amounts receivable from Dish Mexico |
| $ | 8,594 |
| $ | 2,296 |
|
|
|
Joint Venture in Taiwan
During December 2009,Deluxe/EchoStar LLC
We own 50% of Deluxe/EchoStar LLC ("Deluxe"), a joint venture that we entered into a joint venturein 2010 to provide a DTHbuild an advanced digital cinema satellite servicedistribution network targeting delivery to digitally equipped theaters in Taiwanthe U.S. and certain other targeted regionsCanada. We account for our investment in Asia. We own 50%Deluxe using the equity method. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and have joint control of the joint venture. Pursuant to these arrangements, we sell hardware such as digital set-top boxes and provide certain technical support services to the joint venture. We have provided $18 million of cash to the joint venture, and an $18 million line of credit that the joint venture may only use to purchase set-top boxes from us. This investment is subject to an evaluation for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. This quarterly evaluation consists of reviewing, among other things, company business plans and current financial statements, if available, for factors that may indicate an impairment of our investment. During 2010, we recorded a $14 million charge to fully impair this investment. In December 2011, we entered into an agreement to sell allrecognized revenue from Deluxe for transponder services and the sale of our equity in the joint venture, other than an approximately 5% interest, to a third party for nominal consideration (the “JV Sale Transaction”). Upon the closingbroadband equipment of the JV Sale Transaction, which is subject to receipt of customary regulatory approvals, our line of credit will be terminated. We expect to close the JV Sale Transaction during the first half of 2012.$1.8 million, $1.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011,2013 and 2012, we have receivables from Deluxe of approximately $1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Note 20. Subsequent Events
Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction.
On February 20, 2014, EchoStar entered into agreements with DISH Network to implement a transaction pursuant to which, among other things: (i) on March 1, 2014, EchoStar will issue two series of preferred tracking stocks in exchange for the transfer by DISH of five satellites (including related in-orbit incentive obligations and interest payments of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash; and (ii) beginning on March 1, 2014, we will lease to DISH Network certain satellite capacity on these five satellites (collectively, the "Satellite and Tracking Stock Transaction").
Transaction Agreement. On February 20, 2014, EchoStar Corporation, Hughes Satellite Systems Corporation ("HSS"), and certain of our other subsidiaries entered into a Transaction Agreement (the "Transaction Agreement") with DISH Operating L.L.C. ("DOLLC") and DISH Network L.L.C. ("DNLLC" and, together with DOLLC, the "DISH Investors"), each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation ("DISH Network"), and EchoStar XI Holding L.L.C., a wholly-owned subsidiary of DNLLC, pursuant to which on March 1, 2014, EchoStar Corporation and HSS will among other things, issue an aggregate of 6,290,499 shares (the "EchoStar Tracking Stock") and 81.128 shares the "HSS Tracking Stock", and together with the EchoStar Tracking Stock, the "Tracking Stock"), respectively, of preferred tracking stock to the DISH Investors in exchange for the transfer by the DISH Investors and their respective subsidiaries, as applicable, to EchoStar Corporation and HSS, as applicable, five satellites (EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI and EchoStar XIV) (including related in-orbit incentive obligations of approximately $58.9 million) and approximately $11.4 million in cash (the "Transaction"). The Tracking Stock will generally track the residential retail satellite broadband business of Hughes Network Systems, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSS ("Hughes"), including without limitation the operations, assets and liabilities attributed to the Hughes residential retail satellite broadband business (collectively, the "Hughes Retail Group"). The shares of the Tracking Stock to be issued to the DISH Investors will represent an aggregate 80.0% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group. In addition to the remaining amount available20.0% economic interest in the Hughes Retail Group, EchoStar will retain all economic interest in the wholesale satellite broadband business. The Transaction Agreement includes, among other things, customary mutual provisions for representations, warranties and indemnification.
Satellite Capacity Leased to DISH. On February 20, 2014, we and certain subsidiaries of DISH Network entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which beginning March 1, 2014, DISH Network will, among other things, lease certain satellite capacity on the EchoStar I, EchoStar VII, EchoStar X, EchoStar XI, and EchoStar XIV satellites. The total fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the number of transponders on the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each satellite capacity agreement generally terminates upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued
fails; or (iii) a certain date based upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite. DISH generally has the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite's life. There can be no assurance that any options to renew such agreements will be exercised.
Investor Rights Agreement. On February 20, 2014, EchoStar and HSS entered into an Investor Rights Agreement (the "Investor Rights Agreement") with the DISH Investors with respect to the Tracking Stock. The Investor Rights Agreement provides for, among other things, certain information and consultation rights for the DISH Investors; certain transfer restrictions on the Tracking Stock and certain rights and obligations to offer and sell under certain circumstances (including a prohibition on transfer of the Tracking Stock for one year, with continuing transfer restrictions (including right of first offer in favor of EchoStar) thereafter, an obligation to sell the Tracking Stock to us in connection with a change of control of DISH Network and a right to require us to repurchase the Tracking Stock in connection with a change of control of EchoStar, in each case subject to certain terms and conditions; certain registration rights; certain obligations to provide conversion and exchange rights of the Tracking Stock under certain circumstances; and certain protective covenants afforded to holders of the Tracking Stock. The Investor Rights Agreement generally will terminate as to the DISH Investors at such time as the DISH Investors no longer hold any shares of the HSS-issued Tracking Stock and any registrable securities under the line of credit was $10 million and if advanced would be subject to our evaluation for other-than-temporary impairment.Investor Rights Agreement.
(Parent Company Information — See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
(Parent Company Only)
|
| As of |
| |
|
| Decmeber 31, 2011 |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Assets |
|
|
| |
Current Assets: |
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ | 433,110 |
|
Marketable investment securities |
| 821,325 |
| |
Total current assets |
| 1,254,435 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Noncurrent Assets: |
|
|
| |
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries, including intercompany balances |
| 1,720,591 |
| |
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
| 746 |
| |
Deferred tax assets |
| 7,206 |
| |
Intangible assets, net |
| 73,009 |
| |
Marketable and other investment securities |
| 24,257 |
| |
Total noncurrent assets |
| 1,825,809 |
| |
Total assets |
| $ | 3,080,244 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
| |
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
| |
Accrued expenses and other |
| $ | 37,728 |
|
Total current liabilities |
| 37,728 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit): |
|
|
| |
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
| — |
| |
Class A common stock, $.001 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 44,500,440 and 43,103,166 shares issued, and 38,968,122 and 37,570,848 shares outstanding, respectively |
| 45 |
| |
Class B common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 47,687,039 shares issued and outstanding |
| 48 |
| |
Class C common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
| — |
| |
Class D common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
| — |
| |
Additional paid-in capital |
| 3,360,301 |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 165,771 |
| |
Accumulated earnings (deficit) |
| (385,487 | ) | |
Treasury stock, at cost |
| (98,162 | ) | |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) |
| 3,042,516 |
| |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) |
| $ | 3,080,244 |
|
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I
(Parent Company Information — See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Parent Company Only)
|
| For the Year |
| |
|
| Ended |
| |
|
| December 31, 2011 |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Costs and Expenses: |
|
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| $ | 1,762 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
| 15,982 |
| |
Total costs and expenses |
| 17,744 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Operating income (loss) |
| (17,744 | ) | |
|
|
|
| |
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
| |
Interest income |
| 7,105 |
| |
Unrealized and realized gains (losses) on marketable investment securities and other investments |
| 6,518 |
| |
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments accounted for at fair value, net |
| 15,871 |
| |
Other, net |
| 3,325 |
| |
Total other income (expense) |
| 32,819 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries, net |
| 15,075 |
| |
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries, net |
| (2,010 | ) | |
Income tax (provision) benefit, net |
| (9,426 | ) | |
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 3,639 |
|
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
SCHEDULE I
(Parent Company Information — See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Parent Company Only)
|
| For the |
| |
|
| Year Ended |
| |
|
| December 31, 2011 |
| |
|
| (In thousands) |
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
| |
Net income (loss) |
| $ | 3,639 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization |
| 15,982 |
| |
Equity in losses (earnings) of affiliates |
| (3,325 | ) | |
Equity in losses (earnings) of consolidated subsidiaries, net |
| 2,010 |
| |
Unrealized and realized (gains) losses on marketable investment securities and other investments |
| (6,518 | ) | |
Unrealized (gains) losses on investments accounted for at fair value, net |
| (15,871 | ) | |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
| (49,353 | ) | |
Other, net |
| 10,173 |
| |
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net |
| 119,472 |
| |
Net cash flows from operating activities |
| 76,209 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
| |
Purchases of marketable investment securities |
| (1,746,577 | ) | |
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities |
| 1,470,904 |
| |
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities |
| 105 |
| |
Purchase of strategic investments included in marketable and other investment securities |
| (59,475 | ) | |
Proceeds from sale of strategic investments |
| 697,498 |
| |
Distributions and advances from (contributions to) subsidiaries and affiliates, net |
| (135,060 | ) | |
Other, net |
| (1,596 | ) | |
Net cash flows from investing activities |
| 225,799 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
| |
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
| 28,718 |
| |
Other |
| 1,882 |
| |
Net cash flows from financing activities |
| 30,600 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| 332,608 |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
| 100,502 |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| $ | 433,110 |
|
Parent company only financials are provided only included as of and for the yearyears ended December 31, 20112013 and 2012 because there were no restricted net assets of EchoStar that would require the filing of such parent company only financials prior to issuance of the Notes and acquisition of Hughes Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries in June 2011.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Parent Company Information Only—See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| | As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | |||||
Assets | |||||||
Current Assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 399,838 | $ | 471,820 | |||
Marketable investment securities | 869,673 | 773,529 | |||||
Other current assets | — | 16,678 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total current assets | 1,269,511 | 1,262,027 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent Assets: | |||||||
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries, including intercompany balances | 1,933,533 | 1,819,699 | |||||
Restricted cash and marketable investment securities | 1,023 | 979 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | 77,664 | 112,619 | |||||
Other intangible assets, net | 39,150 | 56,113 | |||||
Other investments | 37,296 | 54,324 | |||||
Other receivable—DISH Network | 87,972 | — | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total noncurrent assets | 2,176,638 | 2,043,734 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets | $ | 3,446,149 | $ | 3,305,761 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||||||
Current Liabilities: | |||||||
Trade accounts payable—DISH Network | $ | — | $ | 70 | |||
Accrued expenses and other | 225,325 | 159,177 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities | 2,444 | 3,712 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total current liabilities | 227,769 | 162,959 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Noncurrent Liabilities: | |||||||
Long-term deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities | 1,010 | 1,912 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total noncurrent liabilities | 1,010 | 1,912 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities | 228,779 | 164,871 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies | — | — | |||||
Stockholders' Equity: | |||||||
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||
Class A common stock, $.001 par value, 1,600,000,000 shares authorized, 48,370,956 and 45,449,362 shares issued, and 42,838,638 and 39,917,044 shares outstanding, respectively | 48 | 45 | |||||
Class B common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, 47,687,039 shares issued and outstanding | 48 | 48 | |||||
Class C common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||
Class D common stock, $.001 par value, 800,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | — | — | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 3,502,005 | 3,394,646 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (14,655 | ) | 18,752 | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (171,914 | ) | (174,439 | ) | |||
Treasury stock, at cost | (98,162 | ) | (98,162 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total stockholders' equity | 3,217,370 | 3,140,890 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 3,446,149 | $ | 3,305,761 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Parent Company Information Only—See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
(In thousands)
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Costs and Expenses: | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | $ | 1,598 | $ | 1,083 | $ | 1,762 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 16,964 | 16,965 | 15,982 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total costs and expenses | 18,562 | 18,048 | 17,744 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss | (18,562 | ) | (18,048 | ) | (17,744 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | ||||||||||
Interest income and expense, net | 7,197 | 8,874 | 7,105 | |||||||
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net | 36,280 | 162,257 | 6,518 | |||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net | (12,068 | ) | (7,224 | ) | 3,325 | |||||
Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net | — | — | 15,871 | |||||||
Other, net | (598 | ) | 46,026 | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other income, net | 30,811 | 209,933 | 32,819 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income taxes and equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries, net | 12,249 | 191,885 | 15,075 | |||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries, net | (2,251 | ) | 16,033 | (2,010 | ) | |||||
Income tax benefit (provision), net | (7,473 | ) | 3,130 | (9,426 | ) | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income (Loss): | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (15,508 | ) | (2,595 | ) | (14,095 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities and other | 18,413 | 30,799 | (1,276 | ) | ||||||
Recognition of previously unrealized gains on AFS securities in net income | (36,312 | ) | (175,223 | ) | (6,637 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (33,407 | ) | (147,019 | ) | (22,008 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (30,882 | ) | $ | 64,029 | $ | (18,369 | ) | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Parent Company Information Only—See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)
(In thousands)
| | For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,525 | $ | 211,048 | $ | 3,639 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 16,964 | 16,965 | 15,982 | |||||||
Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates, net | 12,068 | 7,224 | (3,325 | ) | ||||||
Equity in losses (earnings) of consolidated subsidiaries, net | 2,251 | (16,033 | ) | 2,010 | ||||||
Realized gains on marketable investment securities and other investments, net | (36,280 | ) | (162,257 | ) | (6,518 | ) | ||||
Gains on investments accounted for at fair value, net | — | — | (15,871 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax provision (benefit) | 33,380 | (95,982 | ) | (49,353 | ) | |||||
Changes in current assets and current liabilities, net | 88,677 | 101,434 | 119,472 | |||||||
Changes in noncurrent assets and noncurrent liabilities, net | (88,874 | ) | 1,912 | — | ||||||
Other, net | 24,494 | 16,893 | 10,173 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from operating activities | 55,205 | 81,204 | 76,209 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: | ||||||||||
Purchases of marketable investment securities | (957,142 | ) | (878,427 | ) | (1,746,577 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of marketable investment securities | 857,139 | 931,317 | 1,470,904 | |||||||
Contributions to subsidiaries and affiliates, net | (98,387 | ) | (118,049 | ) | (135,060 | ) | ||||
Distribution received from investments in affiliates | — | 7,500 | — | |||||||
Change in restricted cash and marketable investment securities | (44 | ) | (233 | ) | 105 | |||||
Purchase of strategic investments securities | — | — | (59,475 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of strategic investments | — | — | 697,498 | |||||||
Other, net | — | — | (1,596 | ) | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from investing activities | (198,434 | ) | (57,892 | ) | 225,799 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: | ||||||||||
Net proceeds from Class A common stock options exercised and stock issued under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan | 71,247 | 15,398 | 28,718 | |||||||
Other | — | — | 1,882 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net cash flows from financing activities | 71,247 | 15,398 | 30,600 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | (71,982 | ) | 38,710 | 332,608 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 471,820 | 433,110 | 100,502 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 399,838 | $ | 471,820 | $ | 433,110 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ECHOSTAR CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Our valuation and qualifying accounts as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 2010 and 2009 arewere as follows:
|
| Balance at |
| Charged to |
|
|
| Balance at |
| |||||
|
| Beginning |
| Costs and |
|
|
| End of |
| |||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| of Year |
| Expenses |
| Deductions |
| Year |
| |||||
|
| (In thousands) |
| |||||||||||
For the years ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
December 31, 2011 |
| $ | 7,644 |
| $ | 18,779 |
| $ | (7,939 | ) | $ | 18,484 |
| |
December 31, 2010 |
| $ | 5,605 |
| $ | 3,672 |
| $ | (1,633 | ) | $ | 7,644 |
| |
December 31, 2009 |
| $ | 7,182 |
| $ | (1,719 | ) | $ | 142 |
| $ | 5,605 |
| |
Allowance for doubtful accounts | Balance at Beginning of Year | Charged to Costs and Expenses | Deductions | Balance at End of Year | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
For the years ended: | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | $ | 16,894 | $ | 35,311 | $ | (38,968 | ) | $ | 13,237 | ||||
December 31, 2012 | $ | 18,484 | $ | 27,099 | $ | (28,689 | ) | $ | 16,894 | ||||
December 31, 2011 | $ | 7,644 | $ | 18,779 | $ | (7,939 | ) | $ | 18,484 | ||||