Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122014

 

or

 

o          TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                to

 

Commission file number 1-13397

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified inIts Charter)

 

Delaware

 

22-3514823

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

 

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois

 

60154

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (708) 551-2600

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $.01 par value per share

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

 

Note — Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

 

Large accelerated filer x

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

 

The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (based upon the per share closing price of $49.52$75.04 on June 29, 2012,30, 2014, and, for the purpose of this calculation only, the assumption that all of the Registrant’s directors and executive officers are affiliates) was approximately $3,793,000,000.$5,319,000,000.

 

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, as of February 25, 2013,19, 2015, was 77,266,000.71,505,000.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

 

Information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this document is incorporated by reference to certain portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to be distributed in connection with its 20132015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2012.2014.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

Part I

 

 

Item 1.

Business

3

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1415

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

1921

Item 2.

Properties

1921

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

2021

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

2123

Part II

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2123

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

2325

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2527

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4648

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4851

Item 9.

Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

9294

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

9294

Item 9B.

Other Information

9394

Part III

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

9395

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

9395

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

9395

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

9395

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

9395

Part IV

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

9395

 

 

 

Signatures

 

99101

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I.

 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

 

The Company

 

On May 15, 2012, the Company’s stockholders approved the Company’s name change to Ingredion Incorporated (“Ingredion”) from Corn Products International, Inc.  We believe the name better reflects our position asis a leading global manufacturer and supplier of starch and sweetener ingredients to a range of industries, including packaged food, beverage, brewing, industrial, pharmaceutical and industrialpersonal care customers.  Ingredion was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1997 and its common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange.On October 1, 2010, we acquired National Starch, a global developer and manufacturer of specialty and modified starches for a cash purchase price of $1.369 billion.  The acquisition provided Ingredion with a broader portfolio of products, enhanced geographic reach, and the ability to offer customers a broad range of value added ingredient solutions for a variety of their evolving needs. 

On October 14, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Penford Corporation (“Penford”), a US-based leader in specialty ingredients for food and non-food applications.  The acquisition has been approved by the boards of directors of both companies and by the shareholders of Penford.  It is subject to approval by regulators as well as to other customary closing conditions.  The purchase price is approximately $340 million, including the assumption of debt.  Penford, headquartered in Centennial, Colorado had net sales of $444 million in fiscal year 2014.  Penford employs approximately 443 people and operates six plants in the United States, all of which manufacture specialty starches.  The acquisition will provide Ingredion with an enhanced portfolio of specialty and industrial products and further improve our ability to offer customers a broad range of value added ingredient solutions for a variety of their evolving needs.  The acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015 pending regulatory approval.

 

For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the “Company,” “Ingredion,” “we,” “us,” and “our” shall mean Ingredion Incorporated and its subsidiaries.

On October 1, 2010, the Company acquired National Starch, a global developer and manufacturer of specialty modified starches from Akzo Nobel N.V., headquartered in the Netherlands.  National Starch is a recognized innovator in starch and food ingredients.  Its technologies are supported by a research and development infrastructure and protected by more than 800 patents and patents pending, which drive development of advanced specialty starches for the next generation of food products.

 

Ingredion supplies a broad range of customers in many diverse industries around the world, including the food, beverage, brewing, pharmaceutical, paper and corrugated products, textile and personal care industries, as well as the global animal feed and corn oil markets.

 

Our product line includes starches and sweeteners, animal feed products and edible corn oil.  Our starch-based products include both food-grade and industrial starches.  Our sweetener products include glucose syrups, high maltose syrups, high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”), caramel color, dextrose, polyols, maltodextrins and glucose and syrup solids.

 

Our products are derived primarily from the processing of corn and other starch-based materials, such as tapioca, potato and rice.

 

Our manufacturing process is based on a capital-intensive, two-step process that involves the wet milling and processing of starch-based materials, primarily corn.  During the front-end process, corn is steeped in a water-based solution and separated into starch and co-products such as animal feed and corn oil.  The starch is then either dried for sale or further processed to make sweeteners, starches and other ingredients that serve the particular needs of various industries.

 

We believe our approach to production and service, which focuses on local management and production improvements of our worldwide operations, provides us with a unique understanding of the cultures and product requirements in each of the geographic markets in which we operate, bringing added value to our customers through innovative solutions.

 

Our consolidated net sales were $6.53$5.67 billion in 2012.2014.  Approximately 5755 percent of our 20122014 net sales were provided from our North American operations. Our South American operations provided 2221 percent of net sales, while our Asia Pacific and EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) operations contributed approximately 1314 percent and 810 percent, respectively.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

Products

 

Sweetener Products. Our sweetener products represented approximately 39 percent, 42 percent and 44 percent 43 percent and 52 percentof our net sales for 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively.

 

Glucose Syrups: Glucose syrups are fundamental ingredients widely used in food products, such as baked goods, snack foods, beverages, canned fruits, condiments, candy and other sweets, dairy products, ice cream, jams and jellies, prepared mixes and table syrups.  Glucose syrups offer functionality in addition to sweetness to processed foods.  They add body and viscosity; help control freezing points, crystallization and browning; add humectancy (ability to add moisture) and flavor; and act as binders.

 

High Maltose Syrup: This special type of glucose syrup is primarily used as a fermentable sugar in brewing beers. High maltose syrups are also used in the production of confections, canning and some other food processing applications.  Our high maltose syrups actually speedsspeed the fermentation process, allowing brewers to increase capacity without adding capital.

 

High Fructose Corn Syrup: High fructose corn syrup is used in a variety of consumer products including soft drinks, fruit-flavored beverages, baked goods, dairy products, confections and other food and beverage products.  In addition to sweetness and ease of use, high fructose corn syrup provides body; humectancy; and aids in browning, freezing point and crystallization control.

 

Dextrose: Dextrose has a wide range of applications in the food and confection industries, in solutions for intravenous and other pharmaceutical applications, and numerous industrial applications like wallboard, biodegradable surface agents and moisture control agents. Dextrose functionality in foods, beverages and confectionary includes sweetness control; body and viscosity; actsacting as a bulking, drying and anti-caking agent; servesserving as a carrier; providesproviding freezing point and crystallization control; and aidsaiding in fermentation.  Dextrose is also a fermentation agent in the production of light beer.  In pharmaceutical applications dextrose is used in IV solutions as well as an excipient suitable for direct compression in tableting.

 

Polyols:  These products are sugar-free, reduced calorie sweeteners primarily derived from starch or sugar for the food, beverage, confectionery, industrial, personal and oral care, and nutritional supplement markets.  In addition to sweetness, polyols inhibit crystallization; provide binding, humectancy and plasticity; add texture; extend shelf life; prevent moisture migration; and are an excipient suitable for tableting.

 

Maltodextrins and Glucose Syrup Solids: These products have a multitude of food applications, including formulations where liquid syrups cannot be used. Maltodextrins are resistant to browning, provide excellent solubility, have a low hydroscopicity (do not retain moisture), and are ideal for their carrier/bulking properties. Glucose syrup solids have a bland flavor, remain clear in solution, are easy to handle and provide bulking properties.

 

Starch Products.  Our starch products represented approximately 3743 percent, 3641 percent and 2837 percent of our net sales for 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively.  Starches are an important component in a wide range of processed foods, where they are used for adhesions,adhesion, clouding, dusting, expansion, fat replacement, freshness, gelling, glazing, mouth feel, stabilization and texture. Cornstarch is sold to cornstarch packers for sale to consumers.  Starches are also used in paper production to create a smooth surface for printed communications and to improve strength in recycled papers. Specialty starches are used for enhanced drainage, fiber retention, oil and grease resistance, improved printability and biochemical oxygen demand control. In the corrugating industry, starches and specialty starches are used to produce high quality adhesives for the production of shipping containers, display board and other corrugated applications.  The textile industry uses starches and specialty starches for sizing (abrasion resistance) to provide size and finishes for manufactured products.  Industrial starches are used in the production of construction materials, textiles, adhesives, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, as well as in mining, water filtration and oil and gas drilling. Specialty starches are used

4



Table of Contents

for biomaterial applications including biodegradable plastics, fabric softeners and detergents, hair and skin care applications, dusting powders for surgical gloves and in the production of glass fiber and insulation.

4



Table of Contents

Specialty Ingredients.  We consider certain of our starch and sweetener products to be specialty ingredients.  Specialty ingredients comprised approximately 24 percent of our net sales for 2014, up from 21 percent in 2013.  Our specialty ingredients are aligned with growing market and consumer trends such as health and wellness, clean-label, affordability, indulgence and sustainability.  We plan to drive growth for our specialty ingredients portfolio by leveraging the following six platforms (or springboards): Wholesome, Texture, Nutrition, Sweetness, Delivery Systems and Green Solutions.

Wholesome - Clean-label solutions that enable front-of-pack claims

Nutrition - Nutritional carbohydrates with benefits of digestive health and energy management

Texture - Precise texture solutions designed to optimize consumer acceptance and build back texture

Delivery Systems - Functional ingredients designed to deliver superior emulsification and protection of flavors and other active ingredients

Sweetness - Sweetening systems that provide affordability, natural, reduced calorie, and sugar-free solutions

Green Solutions - Nature-based materials for replacement of synthetics in non-food applications

Wholesome: Specialty ingredients that provide clean-label solutions enabling front-of-pack claims for our customers.  Products include Novation clean label functional starches, value added pulse-based ingredients and Gluten Free offerings.  Texture: Specialty ingredients that provide food texture solutions for consumer acceptance and build back texture.  Include starch systems that replace more expensive ingredients and are designed to optimize customer formulation costs, texturizers that create rich, creamy mouth feel, and products that enhance texture in healthier offerings.  Nutrition: Specialty ingredients that provide nutritional carbohydrates with benefits of digestive health and energy management.  Our fibers and complimentary nutritional ingredients address the leading health and wellness concerns of consumers, including digestive health, infant nutrition, weight and energy management, aging and immunity.  Sweetness: Specialty ingredients that provide affordability, natural, reduced calorie and sugar-free sweetener solutions for our customers.  We have a broad portfolio of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners, including high potency sweeteners and our naturally based stevia sweetener.  Delivery Systems: Functional ingredients that are designed to deliver superior emulsification and protection of flavors and other active ingredients.  Products include starches to help emulsify or mix natural colors in beverages and specialty starches that encapsulate and protect flavors and vitamins in pharmaceuticals and spray-dried food ingredients.  Green Solutions: Bio-based solutions that help manufacturers become more sustainable by replacing synthetic materials with nature-based ingredients in personal care, home care and other industrial segments.

Each springboard addresses multiple consumer trends.  For instance, specialty texture solutions are leveraged to address consumer health and wellness, affordability and indulgence demands while wholesome solutions can address clean-label, indulgence and health and wellness consumer demands.  Specialty ingredients that provide nutrition solutions for health and wellness can also address food indulgence and convenience desires of consumers.  Specialty ingredients that provide sweetness solutions for health and wellness demands can also deliver affordability and food indulgence solutions.

5



Table of Contents

 

Co-Products and others.  Co-products and others accounted for 1918 percent, 2117 percent and 2019 percent of our net sales for 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively.  Refined corn oil (from germ) is sold to packers of cooking oil and to producers of margarine, salad dressings, shortening, mayonnaise and other foods.  Corn gluten feed is sold as animal feed. Corn gluten meal is sold as high proteinhigh-protein feed for chickens, pet food and aquaculture.

 

Geographic Scope and Operations

 

We are principally engaged in the production and sale of sweeteners and starches for a wide range of industries, and we manage our business on a geographic regional basis.  Our operations are classified into four reportable business segments based on the geographic organization of our business:segments: North America, South America, Asia Pacific and EMEA.  In 2012,2014, approximately 5755 percent of our net sales were derived from operations in North America, while net sales from operations in South America represented 2221 percent.  OurNet sales from operations in Asia Pacific and EMEA operations represented approximately 1314 percent and 810 percent, respectively, of our 2014 net sales, respectively.sales.  See Note 1412 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Segment Information” for additional financial information with respect to our reportable business segments.

 

In general, demand for our products is balanced throughout the year.  However, demand for sweeteners in South America is greater in the first and fourth quarters (its summer season) while demand for sweeteners in North America is greater in the second and third quarters.  Due to the offsetting impact of these demand trends, we do not experience material seasonal fluctuations in our net sales.

 

Our North America segment consists of operations in the US, Canada and Mexico. The region’s facilities include 13 plants producing a wide range of both sweeteners and starches.

 

We are the largest manufacturer of corn-based starches and sweeteners in South America, with sales in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru.Ecuador and the Southern Cone of South America, which includes Argentina, Chile, Peru and Uruguay.  Our South America segment includes 11 plants that produce regular, modified, waxy and tapioca starches, high fructose and high maltose syrups and syrup solids, dextrins and maltodextrins, dextrose, specialty starches, caramel color, sorbitol and vegetable adhesives.

 

Our Asia Pacific segment manufactures corn-based products in South Korea, Australia and China.  Also, we manufacture tapioca-based products in Thailand, which supplies not only our Asia Pacific segment but the rest of our global network.  The region’s facilities include 7 plants that produce modified, specialty, regular, waxy and tapioca starches, dextrins, glucose, high maltose syrup, dextrose, high fructose corn syrupsHFCS and caramel color.

 

Our EMEA segment includes 5 plants that produce modified and specialty starches, glucose and dextrose in England, Germany and Pakistan.

 

Additionally, Ingredion utilizeswe utilize a network of tolling manufacturers in its various regions in the production cycle of certain specialty starches.  In general, these tolling manufacturers produce certain basic starches for the Company,us, and we in turn complete the manufacturing process of the specialty starches through our finishing channels.

 

We utilize our global network of manufacturing facilities to support key global product lines.

5



Table of Contents

 

Competition

 

The starch and sweetener industry is highly competitive.  Many of our products are viewed as basic ingredients that compete with virtually identical products and derivatives manufactured by other companies in the industry.  The US is a highly competitive market where there are other starch processors, several of which are divisions of larger enterprises.  Some of these competitors, unlike us, have vertically integrated their starch processing and other operations.  Competitors include ADM Corn Processing Division (“ADM”) (a division of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company), Cargill, Inc., Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc., and several others. Our operations in Mexico and Canada face competition from US imports and local producers including ALMEX, a Mexican joint venture between ADM and Tate &

6



Table of Contents

Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc.  In South America, Cargill has starch processing operations in Brazil and Argentina.  Many smaller local corn and tapioca refiners also operate in many of our markets. Competition within our markets is largely based on price, quality and product availability.

 

Several of our products also compete with products made from raw materials other than corn. High fructose corn syrupHFCS and monohydrate dextrose compete principally with cane and beet sugar products. Co-products such as corn oil and gluten meal compete with products of the corn dry milling industry and with soybean oil, soybean meal and other products. Fluctuations in prices of these competing products may affect prices of, and profits derived from, our products.

 

Customers

 

We supply a broad range of customers in over 60 industries worldwide.  The following table provides the percentage of total net sales by industry for each of our segments for 2012:2014:

 

 

Total

 

North

 

South

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

North

 

South

 

 

 

 

 

Industries Served

 

Company

 

America

 

America

 

APAC

 

EMEA

 

 

Company

 

America

 

America

 

APAC

 

EMEA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Food

 

44

%

39

%

42

%

52

%

68

%

 

51

%

48

%

43

%

65

%

63

%

Beverage

 

15

%

19

%

12

%

6

%

2

%

 

13

%

17

%

10

%

7

%

1

%

Animal Nutrition

 

12

%

12

%

14

%

8

%

8

%

 

13

%

14

%

17

%

6

%

9

%

Paper and Corrugating

 

9

%

9

%

9

%

15

%

3

%

 

9

%

9

%

9

%

14

%

3

%

Brewing

 

9

%

8

%

15

%

4

%

0

%

 

7

%

7

%

14

%

3

%

0

%

Other

 

11

%

13

%

8

%

15

%

19

%

 

7

%

5

%

7

%

5

%

24

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

Also noteworthy, approximately 18 percent of our net sales in 2012 were to customers that we regard as Global Accounts.  No customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our net sales in 2012, 20112014, 2013 or 2010.2012.

 

Raw Materials

 

Corn (primarily yellow dent) is the primary basic raw material we use to produce starches and sweeteners.  The supply of corn in the United States has been, and is anticipated to continue to be, adequate for our domestic needs. The price of corn, which is determined by reference to prices on the Chicago Board of Trade, fluctuates as a result of various factors including: farmerfarmers’ planting decisions, climate, and government policies (including those related to the production of ethanol), livestock feeding, shortages or surpluses of world grain supplies, and domestic and foreign government policies and trade agreements.  The CompanyWe also usesuse tapioca, potato, rice and sugar as a raw material.

 

Corn is also grown in other areas of the world, including Canada, Mexico, Europe, South Africa, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China and Pakistan.  Our affiliates outside the United States utilize both local supplies of corn and corn imported from other geographic areas, including the United States.  The supply of corn for these affiliates is also generally expected to be adequate for our needs.  Corn prices for our non-US affiliates generally fluctuate as a result of the same factors that affect US corn prices.

 

We also utilize specialty grains such as waxy and high amylose corn in our operations.  In general, the planning cycle for our specialty grain sourcing begins three years in advance of the anticipated delivery of the specialty corn since the necessary seed must be grown in the season prior to grain contracting.  In order to producesecure these specialty grains at the time of our anticipated needs, we contract with certain farmers to grow the specialty corn approximately two years in advance of delivery.  These specialty grains are higher cost due to their more limited supply and require longer planning cycles to mitigate the risk of supply shortages.

 

67



Table of Contents

 

Due to the competitive nature of our industry and the availability of substitute products not produced from corn, such as sugar from cane or beets, end product prices may not necessarily fluctuate in a manner that correlates to raw material costs of corn.

 

We follow a policy of hedging our exposure to commodity fluctuations with commodities futures and options contracts primarily for certain of our North American corn purchases.  We use derivative hedging contracts to protect the gross margin of our firm-priced business in North America.  Other business may or may not be hedged at any given time based on management’s judgment as to the need to fix the costs of our raw materials to protect our profitability.  Outside of North America, we generally enter into short-term commercial sales contracts and adjust our selling prices based upon the local raw material costs.  See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in the section entitled “Commodity Costs” for additional information.

 

Research and Development

 

We have a global research and development capabilitycapabilities concentrated in Bridgewater, New Jersey.  Activities at Bridgewater include plant science and physical, chemical and biochemical modifications to food formulation,formulations, food sensory evaluation, as well as development of non-food applications, such as starch-based biopolymers.  In 2013, we expanded our Bridgewater facility with the addition Ingredion hasof a lab and sensory evaluation space dedicated to our sweeteners portfolio.  In addition, we have product application technology centers that direct our product development teams worldwide to create product application solutions to better serve the ingredient needs of our customers.  Product development activity is focused on developing product applications for identified customer and market needs.  Through this approach, we have developed value-added products for use by customers in various industries.  We usually collaborate with customers to develop the desired product application either in the customers’ facilities, our technical service laboratories or on a contract basis. These efforts are supported by our marketing, product technology and technology support staff.  Research and development expense for 20122014 was approximately $37 million, or approximately one-half of one percent of our total net sales.million.

 

Sales and Distribution

 

Our salaried sales personnel, who are generally dedicated to customers in a geographic region, sell our products directly to manufacturers and distributors. In addition, we have a staff that provides technical support to our sales personnel on an industry basis.  We generally contract with trucking companies to deliver our bulk products to customer destinations. In North America, we generally use trucks to ship to nearby customers. For those customers located considerable distances from our plants, we use either rail or a combination of railcars and trucks to deliver our products. We generally lease railcars for terms of fivethree to fifteenten years.

 

Patents, Trademarks and Technical License Agreements

 

We own a number of patents, including approximately 800900 patents and patents pending through the acquisition of National Starch which relate to a variety of products and processes, and a number of established trademarks under which we market our products. We also have the right to use other patents and trademarks pursuant to patent and trademark licenses. We do not believe that any individual patent or trademark is material to our business. There is no currently pending challenge to the use or registration of any of our significant patents or trademarks that would have a material adverse impact on the Companyus or itsour results of operations if decided against us.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 20122014 we had approximately 11,20011,400 employees, of which approximately 1,900 were located in the United States.  Approximately 3536 percent of US and 4748 percent of our non-US employees are unionized.  In addition, the Company hasOf our total, we have approximately 9001,100 temporary employees.

7



Table of Contents

 

Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

 

As a manufacturer and makermarketer of food items and items for use in the pharmaceutical industry, our operations and the use of many of our products are subject to various US,federal, state, foreign and local statutes and regulations, including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act.  We and many of our

8



Table of Contents

products are also subject to regulation by various government agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration.   Among other things, applicable regulations prescribe requirements and establish standards for product quality, purity and labeling.  Failure to comply with one or more regulatory requirements can result in a variety of sanctions, including monetary fines.  No such fines of a material nature were imposed on us in 2012.2014.  We may also be required to comply with US,federal, state, foreign and local laws regulating food handling and storage.  We believe these laws and regulations have not negatively affected our competitive position.

 

Our operations are also subject to various US,federal, state, foreign and local laws and regulations with respect to environmental matters, including air and water quality and underground fuel storage tanks, and other regulations intended to protect public health and the environment.  We operate industrial boilers that fire natural gas, coal, or biofuels to operate our manufacturing facilities and they are our primary source of greenhouse gas emissions.  In Argentina, we are in discussions with local regulators associated with conducting studies of possible environmental remediation programs at our Chacabuco plant.  We are unable to predict the outcome of these discussions; however, we do not believe that the ultimate cost of remediation will be material.  Based on current laws and regulations and the enforcement and interpretations thereof, we do not expect that the costs of future environmental compliance will be a material expense, although there can be no assurance that we will remain in compliance or that the costs of remaining in compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of operations.

 

During 2012,2014, we spent approximately $4$9 million for environmental control and wastewater treatment equipment to be incorporated into existing facilities and in planned construction projects.  We currently anticipate that we will spend approximately $12 million and $8 million for environmental facilities and programs in 2013both 2015 and 2014, respectively.2016.

 

Other

 

Our Internet address is www.ingredion.com.  We make available, free of charge through our Internet website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  These reports are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Our corporate governance guidelines, Boardboard committee charters and code of ethics are posted on our website, the address of which is www.ingredion.com, and each is available in print to any shareholder upon request in writing to Ingredion Incorporated, 5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, Illinois 60154 Attention: Corporate Secretary.  The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference into this report.

 

89



Table of Contents

 

Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

Set forth below are the names and ages of all of our executive officers, indicating their positions and offices with the Company and other business experience during the past five years.experience.  Our executive officers are elected annually by the Board to serve until the next annual election of officers and until their respective successors have been elected and have qualified unless removed by the Board.

Name

 

Age

 

Positions, Offices and Business Experience

 

 

 

 

 

Ilene S. Gordon

 

5961

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 4, 2009. Ms. Gordon was President and Chief Executive Officer of Rio Tinto’s Alcan Packaging, a multinational business unit engaged in flexible and specialty packaging, from October 2007 until she took office as Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. From December 2006 to October 2007, Ms. Gordon was a Senior Vice President of Alcan Inc. and President and Chief Executive Officer of Alcan Packaging. Alcan Packaging was acquired by Rio Tinto in October 2007. From 2004 until December 2006, Ms. Gordon served as President of Alcan Food Packaging Americas, a division of Alcan Inc. From 1999 until Alcan’s December 2003 acquisition of Pechiney Group, Ms. Gordon was a Senior Vice President of Pechiney Group and President of Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc., a global flexible packaging business. Prior to joining Pechiney in June 1999, Ms. Gordon spent 17 years with Tenneco Inc., where she most recently served as Vice President and General Manager, heading up Tenneco’s folding carton business. Ms. Gordon also serves as a director of International Paper Company, a global paper and packaging company,company. She served as a director of Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., an international insurance brokerage and risk management business, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, The Executives’ Club of Chicago, The Economic Club of Chicago, The Chicago Council on Global Affairsfrom 1999 to May 15, 2013 and World Business Chicago. She is also a trustee of The Conference Board. Ms. Gordon served as a director of United Stationers Inc., a wholesale distributor of business products and a provider of marketing and logistics services to resellers, from January 2000 until May 2009. Ms. Gordon also serves as a director of Northwestern Memorial Hospital, The Executives’ Club of Chicago, the Economic Club of Chicago, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs and World Business Chicago. She is also a trustee of The MIT Corporation and The Conference Board. Ms. Gordon holds a Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and a Master’s degree in management from MIT’s Sloan School of Management.

9



Table of Contents

Cheryl K. Beebe

57

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 1, 2010. Ms. Beebe previously served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from February 2004 to September 30, 2010, as Vice President, Finance from July 2002 to February 2004, as Vice President from 1999 to 2002 and as Treasurer from 1997 to February 2004. Prior to that, she served as Director of Finance and Planning worldwide for the Corn Refining Business of CPC International, Inc., now Unilever Bestfoods (“CPC”), from 1995 to 1997 and as Director of Financial Analysis and Planning for Corn Products North America from 1993. Ms. Beebe joined CPC in 1980 and served in various financial positions in CPC’s US consumer food business, North American audit group and worldwide corporate treasury group. Ms. Beebe is a member of the Board of Directors of Packaging Corporation of America. She was a member of the Board of Trustees of Fairleigh Dickinson University from 2006 to 2009. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Rutgers University and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Fairleigh Dickenson University.

 

 

 

 

 

Christine M. Castellano

 

4749

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer since

10



Table of Contents

April 1, 2013.  Prior to that Ms. Castellano served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary sincefrom October 1, 2012.2012 to March 31, 2013. Ms. Castellano previously served as Vice President International Law and Deputy General Counsel from April 28, 2011 to September 30, 2012, Associate General Counsel, South America and Europe and Assistant Secretary from January 1, 2011 to April 27, 2011, and as Associate General International Counsel from 2004 to December 31, 2010.  Prior to that, Ms. Castellano served as Counsel US and Canada from 2002 to 2004.  Ms. Castellano joined CPC International, Inc. now Unilever Bestfoods (“CPC”) as Operations Attorney in September 1996 and held that position until 2002.  CPC was a worldwide group of businesses, principally engaged in three major industry segments: consumer foods, baking and corn refining.  Ingredion commenced operations as a spin-off of CPC’s corn refining business.  Prior to joining CPC, Ms. Castellano was aan income partner in the law firm McDermott Will & Emery from January 1, 1996 and had served as an associate in that firm from 1991 to December 31, 1996.  She also serves as a trustee of the John Marshall Law School and the Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum.  Ms. Castellano holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from the University of Colorado and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Michigan School of Law.

 

 

 

 

 

Julio dos ReisRicardo de Abreu Souza

 

5764

 

Senior Vice President and President, South America Ingredient Solutions since OctoberJanuary 1, 2014.   Prior to that Mr. de Abreu Souza served as President and General Manager of the Company’s Mexican subsidiary, from February 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. Mr. de Abreu Souza previously served as Commercial Director of the Company’s Mexican subsidiary from 2006 to January 31, 2010.  Prior thereto he served in positions of increasing responsibility since joining the Company in 1977.  Mr. de Abreu Souza holds a Bachelor degree in chemical engineering from MacKenzie University in Sao Paulo, Brazil and a Master degree in business administration from IPADE Business School of Universidad Panamericana in Mexico.

Anthony P. DeLio

59

Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer since January 1, 2014. Prior to that Mr. DeLio served as Vice President, Global Innovation from November 4, 2010 to December 31, 2013, and he served as Vice President, Global Innovation for National Starch from January 1, 2009 to November 3, 2010.  Mr. dos ReisDeLio served as Vice President and President, SouthGeneral Manager, North America, Divisionof National Starch from September 1, 2010February 26, 2006 to September 30, 2010.December 31,

 

1011



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. dos Reis previously2008.  Prior to that he served as Associate Vice Chancellor of Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign from August 2004 to February 2006.  Previously, Mr. DeLio served as Corporate Vice President of Marketing and General ManagerExternal Relations of Archer Daniels Midland Company (“ADM”), one of the South America Division’s Southern Coneworld’s largest processors of oilseeds, corn, wheat, cocoa and other agricultural commodities and a leading manufacturer of protein meal, vegetable oil, corn sweeteners, flour, biodiesel, ethanol and other value-added food and feed ingredients, from October 2002 to October 2003.  Prior to that Mr. DeLio was President of  the Protein Specialties and Nutraceutical Divisions of ADM from September 17, 20032000 to August 31, 2010. Prior thereto, he joined CPC in February 1992 as its Argentine subsidiary’s Corporate Internal Audit Manager,October 2002 and President of the Nutraceutical Division of ADM from June 1999 to September 2001. He held various senior product development positions of increasing responsibility, including Supply Chain Manager and Chief Financial Officer of that subsidiary. Priorwith Mars, Inc. from 1980 to joining CPC, he served in a number of management roles for IBM Corporation. HeMay 1999. Mr. DeLio holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administrationchemical engineering from the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina; a postgraduate degree in Negotiation from the Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina; and a certificate from the Advanced Executive Program of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

 

 

 

 

 

Jack C. Fortnum

 

5658

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 6, 2014.  Prior to that Mr. Fortnum served as Executive Vice President and President, North America sincefrom February 1, 2012.2012 to January 5, 2014.  Mr. Fortnum previously served as Executive Vice President and President, Global Beverage, Industrial and North America Sweetener Solutions from October 1, 2010 to January 31, 2012.  Prior thereto, Mr. Fortnum served as Vice President from 1999 to September 30, 2010 and President of the North America Division from May 2004 to September 30, 2010. Prior to that heMr. Fortnum joined CPC in 1984 and held positions of increasing responsibility including serving as President, US/Canadian Region of the Company from July 2003 to May 2004. Mr. Fortnum is a member of the Board of Directors of GreenField Ethanol, Inc. He is a former Chairman of the Board of the Corn Refiners Association.  Mr. Fortnum holds a BachelorsBachelor degree in economics from the University of Toronto and completed the Senior Business Administration Course offered by McGill University.

 

 

 

 

 

Diane J. Frisch

 

5860

 

Senior Vice President, Human Resources since October 1, 2010.  Ms. Frisch previously served as Vice President, Human Resources, from May 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010.   Prior to that,

11



Table of Contents

Ms. Frisch served as Vice President of Human Resources and Communications for the Food Americas and Global Pharmaceutical Packaging businesses of Rio Tinto’s Alcan Packaging, a multinational company engaged in flexible and specialty packaging, from January 2004 to March 30, 2010.  Prior to being acquired by Alcan

12



Table of Contents

Packaging, Ms. Frisch served as Vice President of Human Resources for the flexible packaging business of Pechiney, S.A., an aluminum and packaging company with headquarters in Paris and Chicago, from January 2001 to January 2004.  Previously, she served as Vice President of Human Resources for Culligan International Company and Vice President and Director of Human Resources for Alumax Mill Products, Inc., a division of Alumax Inc. Ms. Frisch holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology from Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, and a Master of Science degree in industrial relations from the University of Wisconsin in Madison.

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew R. Galvanoni

 

4042

 

Vice President and Corporate Controller since August 15, 2012.  Mr. Galvanoni previously served as Vice President, Corporate Accounting from June 18, 2012, when he joined Ingredion, to August 14, 2012.  Mr. Galvanoni was previously employed by Exelon Corporation for 10 years.  He served as Principal Accounting Officer of Exelon Generation and Vice President and Assistant Corporate Controller of Exelon Corporation from July 2009 until the merger of Exelon Corporation with Constellation Energy Group, Inc. in March 2012, at which time, Mr. Galvanoni became the Vice President, Financial Systems Integration until May 2012.  Mr. Galvanoni previously served as Vice President and Controller of Commonwealth Edison Company and PECO Energy Company from January 2007 to July 2009.  He served in various roles at the Director level of the Controllership organization of Exelon Corporation from November 2002 to December 2006.  Mr. Galvanoni holds a BachelorsBachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and a MastersMaster of Business Administration degree from Northwestern University.  He is a certified public accountant in the State of Illinois.

 

 

 

 

 

Kimberly A. HunterJorgen Kokke

 

51

Corporate Treasurer since February 2004. Ms. Hunter previously served as Director of Corporate Treasury from September 2001 to February 2004. Prior to that, she served as Managing Director, Investment Grade Securities at

12



Table of Contents

Bank One Corporation, a financial institution, from 1997 to 2000 and as Vice President, Capital Markets of Bank One from 1992 to 1997. Ms. Hunter holds a Bachelors degree in government and economics from Harvard University and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Chicago.

Mary Ann Hynes

6546

 

Senior Vice President Counsel to the Chairman and Chief Compliance Officer. Ms. Hynes previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief Compliance Officer from October 1, 2010 toAsia Pacific since September 30, 2012. Ms. Hynes16, 2014.  Mr. Kokke previously served as Vice President and General Counsel and Corporate SecretaryManager, Asia Pacific from March 2006January 6, 2014 to September 30, 2010 and, additionally, Chief Compliance Officer since January 2008.15, 2014.  Prior to that, Ms. Hynes was SeniorMr. Kokke served as Vice President and General Counsel, Chief Legal OfficerManager, EMEA since joining National Starch on March 1, 2009.  Prior to that, he served as a Vice President of CSM NV, a global food ingredients supplier, where he had responsibility for IMC Global Inc., a producer and distributor of crop nutrients and animal feed ingredients, from July 1999 to October 2004, and a consultant to The Mosaic Company, also a producer and distributor of crop nutrients and animal feed ingredients, from October 2004 to October 2005. The Mosaic Company acquired IMC Global Inc. in October 2004. Ms. Hynes is a director of GHD Group Pty Ltd, an international network of engineers, architects and environmental scientists serving clients in the global marketsPurac Food & Nutrition business from 2006 to 2009.  Prior thereto, Mr. Kokke was Director of water, energyStrategy and resources, environment, propertyBusiness Development at CSM NV.  Prior to that he held a variety of roles of increasing responsibility in sales, business development, marketing and buildings and transportation; a member of the Board of Trustees of The John Marshall Law School; and a director of the Dr. Scholl Foundation. Shegeneral management in Unilever’s Loders Crocklaan Group.  Mr. Kokke holds a BachelorsMaster degree in political science (with a minor in mathematics) from Loyola University, Juris Doctor and Master of Laws — Taxation degrees from The John Marshall Law School and an Executive Masters of Business Administration degreeeconomics from the Lake Forest Graduate SchoolUniversity of Business in Chicago.Amsterdam.

 

 

 

 

 

John F. Saucier

 

5961

 

Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Global Business Development since October 1, 2010.  Mr. Saucier previously served as Vice President and President Asia/Africa Division

13



Table of Contents

and Global Business Development from November 2007 to September 30, 2010.  Mr. Saucier previously served as Vice President, Global Business and Product Development, Sales and Marketing from April 2006 to November 2007.  Prior to that, Mr. Saucier was President, Integrated Nylon Division of Solutia Inc., a specialty chemical manufacturer from May 2004 to March 2005, and

13



Table of Contents

Vice President of Solutia and General Manager of its Integrated Nylon Division from September 2001 to May 2004. Solutia Inc. and 14 of its US subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions under the bankruptcy laws in December 2003.   Mr. Saucier holds BachelorsBachelor and MastersMaster degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Missouri and a MastersMaster degree in Business Administration from Washington University in St.  Louis.

 

 

 

 

 

Robert J. Stefansic

53

Senior Vice President, Operational Excellence, Sustainability and Chief Supply Chain Officer since May 28, 2014.  From January 1, 2014 to May 27, 2014, Mr. Stefansic served as Senior Vice President, Operational Excellence and Environmental, Health, Safety & Sustainability.  Prior to that, Mr. Stefansic served as Vice President, Operational Excellence and Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability from August 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. He previously served as Vice President, Global Manufacturing Network Optimization and Environmental, Health, Safety and Sustainability of National Starch, from November 1, 2010 to July 31, 2011. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, Global Operations of National Starch from November 1, 2006 to October 31, 2010.  Prior to that, he served as Vice President, North America Manufacturing of National Starch from December 13, 2004 to October 31, 2006.  Prior to joining National Starch he held positions of increasing responsibility with The Valspar Corporation, General Chemical Corporation and Allied Signal Corporation.  Mr. Stefansic holds a Bachelor degree in chemical engineering and a Master degree in business administration from the University of South Carolina.

James P. Zallie

 

5153

 

Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President North America and EMEA since January 6, 2014.  Prior to that Mr. Zallie served as Executive Vice President, Global Specialties and President, EMEA and Asia-Pacific sinceAsia Pacific from February 1, 2012.2012 to January 5, 2014. Mr. Zallie previously served as Executive Vice President and President, Global Ingredient Solutions from October 1, 2010 to January 31, 2012.  Mr. Zallie previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Starch business from January 2007 to September 30, 2010.   Mr. Zallie worked for

14



Table of Contents

National Starch for more than 27 years in various positions of increasing responsibility, first in technical, then marketing and then international business management positions. Mr. Zallie also serves as a director of Innophos Holdings, Inc., a leading international producer of performance-critical and nutritional specialty ingredients with

applications in food, beverage, dietary supplements, pharmaceutical, oral care and industrial end markets.  He holds Masters degrees in food science and Business Administrationbusiness administration from Rutgers University and a Bachelor of Science degree in food science from Pennsylvania State University.

 

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

 

Our business and assets are subject to varying degrees of risk and uncertainty. The following are factors that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Additional risks that are currently unknown to us may also impair our business or adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are contained in this Form 10-K or in our other filings or statements may be subject to the risks described below as well as other risks and uncertainties. Please read the cautionary notice regarding forward-looking statements in Item 7 below.

 

Current economic conditions may adversely impact demand for our products, reduce access to credit and cause our customers and others with whichwhom we do business to suffer financial hardship, all of which could adversely impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

 

Economic conditions in the US,South America, the European Union South America and many other countries and regions in which we do business have experienced various levels of weakness over the last few years, and may remain challenging for the foreseeable future.  General business and economic conditions that could affect us include the strength of the economies in which we operate, unemployment, inflation and fluctuations in debt markets.  While currently these conditions have not impaired our ability to access credit markets and finance our operations, there can be no assurance that there will not be a further deterioration in the financial markets.

 

There could be a number of other effects from these economic developments on our business, including reduced consumer demand for products; pressure to extend our customers’ payment terms; insolvency of our customers, resulting in increased provisions for credit losses; decreased customer demand, including order delays or cancellations, and counterparty failures negatively impacting our operations.

14



Table of Contents

 

In connection with our defined benefit pension plans, adverse changes in investment returns earned on pension assets and discount rates used to calculate pension and related liabilities or changes in required pension funding levels may have an unfavorable impact on future pension expense and cash flow.

 

In addition, the volatile worldwide economic conditions and market instability may make it difficult for us, our customers and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand trends, which could cause us to produce excess products that can increase our inventory carrying costs.  Alternatively, this forecasting difficulty could cause a shortage of products that could result in an inability to satisfy demand for our products.

 

We operate a multinational business subject to the economic, political and other risks inherent in operating in foreign countries and with foreign currencies.

 

15



Table of Contents

We have operated in foreign countries and with foreign currencies for many years.  Our results are subject to foreign currency exchange fluctuations.  Our operations are subject to political, economic and other risks.  There has been and continues to be significant political uncertainty in some countries in which we operate.  Economic changes, terrorist activity and political unrest may result in business interruption or decreased demand for our products.Protectionist trade measures and import and export licensing requirements could also adversely affect our results of operations.  Our success will depend in part on our ability to manage continued global political and/or economic uncertainty.

 

We primarily sell world commodities.  Historically, local prices have adjusted relatively quickly to offset the effect of local currency devaluations, but there can be no assurancealthough we cannot guarantee this in the future.  Due to pricing controls on many consumer products instituted by the Argentina government, it has taken longer than in the past to achieve pricing improvement in that this will continuecountry.  Also, the recent strength in the US dollar may provide some challenges to beour sales prices as it could take an extended period of time to fully recapture the case.  impact of foreign currency devaluation.

We may hedge transactions that are denominated in a currency other than the currency of the operating unit entering into the underlying transaction.  We are subject to the risks normally attendant to such hedging activities.

 

Raw material and energy price fluctuations, and supply interruptions and shortages could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our finished products are made primarily from corn. Purchased corn and other raw material costs account for between 40 percent and 65 percent of finished product costs.  Some of our products are based upon specific varieties of corn that are produced in significantly less volumes than yellow dent corn.  These specialty grains are higher costhigher-cost due to their more limited supply and require planning cycles of up to three years in order for us to receive our desired amount of specialty corn.  Also, we utilize tapioca in the manufacturing of starch products in Thailand.  If our raw materials are not available in sufficient quantities or quality, our results of operations could be negatively impacted.

 

Energy costs represent approximately 1011 percent of our finished product costs. We use energy primarily to create steam in our production process and to dry product.  We consume coal, natural gas, electricity, wood and fuel oil to generate energy.  In Pakistan, the overall economy has been slowed by severe energy shortages which both negatively impact our ability to produce sweeteners and starches, and also negatively impactsimpact the demand from our customers due to their inability to produce their end products because of the shortage of reliable energy.

 

The market prices for these commoditiesour raw materials may vary considerably depending on supply and demand, world economies and other factors.  We purchase these commodities based on our anticipated usage and future outlook for these costs.  We cannot assure that we will be able to purchase these commodities at prices that we can adequately pass on to customers to sustain or increase profitability.

 

In North America, we sell a large portion of our finished products at firm prices established in supply contracts typically lasting for periods of up to one year.  In order to minimize the effect of volatility in the cost of corn related to these firm-priced supply contracts, we enter into corn futures and options contracts, or take other hedging positions in the corn futures market.  We are unable to directly hedge price risk related to co-product sales; however, we occasionally enter into hedges of soybean oil (a competing product to our animal feed and corn oil) in order to mitigate the price risk of animal

15



Table of Contents

feed and corn oil sales.  These derivative contracts typically mature within one year.  At expiration, we settle the derivative contracts at a net amount equal to the difference between the then-current price of corn (or soybean oil) and the derivative contract price.  These hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value; however, changes in the value of the underlying exposures we are hedging generally offset such fluctuations.  The fluctuations in the fair value of these hedging instruments may affect theour cash flow of the Company.flow.  We fund any unrealized losses or receive cash for any unrealized gains on futures contracts on a daily basis.  While the corn futures contracts or hedging positions are intended to minimize the effect of volatility of corn costs on operating profits, the hedging activity can result in losses, some of which may be material.  Outside of North America, sales of finished products under long-term, firm-priced supply contracts are not material.  We also use over-the-counter natural gas swaps to hedge portions of our natural gas costs, primarily in our North American operations.

 

16



Table of Contents

Due to market volatility, we cannot assure that we can adequately pass potential increases in the cost of corn and other raw materials on to customers through product price increases or purchase quantities of corn and other raw materials at prices sufficient to sustain or increase our profitability.

 

Our corn and raw material costs account for 40 percent to 65 percent of our product costs.  The price and availability of corn and other raw materialsis influenced by economic and industry conditions, including supply and demand factors such as crop disease and severe weather conditions such as drought, floods or frost that are difficult to anticipate and which we cannot control.  There is also a demand for corn in the US to produce ethanol which has been significantly impacted by US governmental policies designed to encourage the production of ethanol.  In addition, government programs supporting sugar prices indirectly impact the price of corn sweeteners, especially high fructose corn syrup.

 

Our profitability may be affected by other factors beyond our control.

 

Our operating income and ability to increase profitability depend to a large extent upon our ability to price finished products at a level that will cover manufacturing and raw material costs and provide an acceptable profit margin. Our ability to maintain appropriate price levels is determined by a number of factors largely beyond our control, such as aggregate industry supply and market demand, which may vary from time to time, and the economic conditions of the geographic regions where we conduct our operations.

 

We operate in a highly competitive environment and it may be difficult to preserve operating margins and maintain market share.

 

We operate in a highly competitive environment.  Many of our products compete with virtually identical or similar products manufactured by other companies in the starch and sweetener industry.  In the United States, there are competitors, several of which are divisions of larger enterprises that have greater financial resources than we do. Some of these competitors, unlike us, have vertically integrated their corn refining and other operations.  Many of our products also compete with products made from raw materials other than corn.corn, including cane and beet sugar.  Fluctuation in prices of these competing products may affect prices of, and profits derived from, our products.  In addition, government programs supporting sugar prices indirectly impact the price of corn sweeteners, especially HFCS.  Competition in markets in which we compete is largely based on price, quality and product availability.

 

Changes in consumer preferences and perceptions may lessen the demand for our products, which could reduce our sales and profitability and harm our business.

 

Food products are often affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local economic conditions and demographic trends. For instance, changes in prevailing health or dietary preferences causing consumers to avoid food products containing sweetener products, including high fructose corn syrup,HFCS, in favor of foods that are perceived as being more healthy, could reduce our sales and profitability, and such a reductionreductions could be material. Increasing concern among consumers, public health professionals and government agencies about the potential health concerns associated with obesity and inactive lifestyles represent a significant challenge to some of our customers, including those engaged in the food and soft drink industries.

16



Table of Contents

 

The uncertainty of acceptance of products developed through biotechnology could affect our profitability.

 

The commercial success of agricultural products developed through biotechnology, including genetically modified corn, depends in part on public acceptance of their development, cultivation, distribution and consumption. Public attitudes can be influenced by claims that genetically modified products are unsafe for consumption or that they pose unknown risks to the environment even if such claims are not based on scientific studies. These public attitudes can influence regulatory and legislative decisions about biotechnology even where they are approved.biotechnology. The sale of the Company’s products which may contain genetically modified corn could be delayed or impaired because of adverse public perception regarding the safety of the Company’s products and the potential effects of these products on animals, human health and the environment.

 

Our information technology systems, processes, and sites may suffer interruptions or failures which may affect our ability to conduct our business.

17



Table of Contents

Our information technology systems, some of which are dependent on services provided by third parties, provide critical data connectivity, information and services for internal and external users.  These interactions include, but are not limited to, ordering and managing materials from suppliers, converting raw materials to finished products, inventory management, shipping products to customers, processing transactions, summarizing and reporting results of operations, human resources benefits and payroll management, complying with regulatory, legal or tax requirements, and other processes necessary to manage our business.  We have put in place security measures to protect ourselves against cyber-based attacks and disaster recovery plans for our critical systems.  However, if our information technology systems are breached, damaged, or cease to function properly due to any number of causes, such as catastrophic events, power outages, security breaches, or cyber-based attacks, and our disaster recovery plans do not effectively mitigate on a timely basis, we may encounter disruptions that could interrupt our ability to manage our operations and suffer damage to our reputation, which may adversely impact our revenues, operating results and financial condition.

Our profitability could be negatively impacted if we fail to maintain satisfactory labor relations.

 

Approximately 3536 percent of our US and 4748 percent of our non-US employees are members of unions.  Strikes, lockouts or other work stoppages or slow downs involving our unionized employees could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Our reliance on certain industries for a significant portion of our sales could have a material adverse affecteffect on our business.

 

Approximately 4451 percent of our 20122014 sales were made to companies engaged in the food industry and approximately 1513 percent were made to companies in both the beverage industry.and animal nutrition markets.  Additionally, sales to the animal nutrition market, the paper and corrugating industry and the brewing industry represented approximately 12 percent, 9 percent and 97 percent of our 20122014 net sales, respectively.  If our food customers, beverage customers, brewing industry customers, paper and corrugating customers or animal feed customers were to substantially decrease their purchases, our business might be materially adversely affected.

 

Natural disasters, war, acts and threats of terrorism, pandemic and other significant events could negatively impact our business.

 

If the economies of any countries where we sell or manufacture products are affected by natural disastersdisasters; such as earthquakes, floods or severe weather; war, acts of war or terrorism; or the outbreak of a pandemic such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”) or the Avian Flu,pandemic; it could result in asset write-offs, decreased sales and overall reduced cash flows.

 

Government policies and regulations in general, and specifically affecting agriculture-related businesses, could adversely affect our operating results.

 

Our operating results could be affected by changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies, laws and regulations, and other activities of United States and foreign governments, agencies, and similar organizations. These conditions include but are not limited to changes in a country’s or region’s economic or political conditions, trade regulations affecting production, pricing and marketing of products, local labor conditions and regulations, reduced protection of intellectual property rights, changes in the regulatory or legal environment, restrictions on currency exchange activities, currency exchange rate fluctuations, burdensome taxes and tariffs, and other trade barriers. International risks and uncertainties, including changing social and economic conditions as well as terrorism, political hostilities, and war, could limit our ability to transact business in these markets and could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.

 

Due to cross-border disputes, our operations could be adversely affected by actions taken by the governments of countries where we conduct business.

 

17



Table of Contents

The recognition of impairment charges on goodwill or long-lived assets could adversely impact our future financial position and results of operations.

18



Table of Contents

 

We perform an annual impairment assessment for goodwill and our indefinite-lived intangible assets, and as necessary, for other long-lived assets.  If the results of such assessments were to show that the fair value of these such assets were less than the carrying values, we could be required to recognize a charge for impairment of goodwill and/or long-lived assets and the amount of the impairment charge could be material.  OurThe results of our impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2014 indicated that the estimated fair value of our Southern Cone of South America reporting unit was less than its carrying amount primarily due to the impacts on its fair value of the elongation of unfavorable financial trends, such as the impact of higher production costs and our inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover the impacts of inflation and currency devaluation.  Also, the political and economic volatility in the region and continued uncertainty in Argentina negatively impacted our earnings forecasts in the near term.  Therefore, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to write-off the remaining balance of goodwill for this reporting unit.  Additionally, based on the results of the annual impairment assessment, we concluded that as of October 1, 2012 did2014, it was more likely than not resultthat the fair value of all other reporting units was greater than their carrying value (although the $32 million of goodwill at our Brazil reporting unit continues to be closely monitored due to recent trends experienced in any additional impairment charges for the year.this reporting unit, such as continued economic headwinds and heightened competition).

 

Even though it was determined that there was no additional long-lived asset impairment as of October 1, 2012,2014, the future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate that would require a change in our assumptions or strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, could require us to perform an assessment prior to the next required assessment date of October 1, 2013.2015.

 

Changes in our tax rates or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could impact our profitability.

 

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and in various other foreign jurisdictions.  Our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, changes in tax laws or tax rates including potential tax reform in the US to broaden the tax base and reduce deductions or credits, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and material adjustments from tax audits.

 

In particular, theThe carrying valuevalues of deferred tax assets, which are predominantly in the US, UKUnited Kingdom, Mexico and Korea, isare dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income in these jurisdictions.  In addition, the amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits in various jurisdictions and a material assessment by a governing tax authority could affect our profitability.

 

Operating difficulties at our manufacturing plants could adversely affect our operating results.

 

Producing starches and sweeteners through corn refining is a capital intensive industry. We have 36 plants and have preventive maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to maintain and improve grind capacity and facility reliability. If we encounter operating difficulties at a plant for an extended period of time or start upstart-up problems with any capital improvement projects, we may not be able to meet a portion of sales order commitments and could incur significantly higher operating expenses, both of which could adversely affect our operating results.  We also use boilers to generate steam required in our manufacturing processes. An event that impaired the operation of a boiler for an extended period of time could have a significant adverse effect on the operations of any plant where such event occurred.

 

Also, we are subject to risks related to such matters as product quality or contamination; compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations; and customer product liability claims.  The liabilities that could result from these risks may not always be covered by, or could exceed the limits of our insurance coverage related to product liability and food safety matters.  In addition, negative publicity caused by product liability and food safety matters may damage our reputation.  The occurrence of any of the matters described above could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.

We may not have access to the funds required for future growth and expansion.

19



Table of Contents

 

We may need additional funds to grow and expand our operations. We expect to fund our capital expenditures from operating cash flow to the extent we are able to do so.  If our operating cash flow is insufficient to fund our capital expenditures, we may either reduce our capital expenditures or utilize our general credit facilities.  For further strategic growth through mergers or acquisitions, we may also seek to generate additional liquidity through the sale of debt or equity securities in private or public markets or through the sale of non-productive assets.  We cannot provide any assurance that our cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund anticipated capital expenditures or that we will be able to obtain additional funds from financial markets or from the sale of assets at terms favorable to us.  If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows or raise sufficient additional funds to cover our capital expenditures or other strategic growth opportunities, we may not be able to achieve our desired operating efficiencies and expansion plans, which may adversely impact our competitiveness and, therefore, our results of operations.

18



Table  Our working capital requirements, including margin requirements on open positions on futures exchanges, are directly affected by the price of Contentscorn and other agricultural commodities, which may fluctuate significantly and change quickly.

 

We may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or strategic alliances on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or alliances, and such acquisitions could result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require significant management resources.

 

We regularly review potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies, services or products, as well as potential strategic alliances. We may be unable to find suitable acquisition candidates or appropriate partners with which to form partnerships or strategic alliances. Even if we identify appropriate acquisition or alliance candidates, we may be unable to complete such acquisitions or alliances on favorable terms, if at all. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired business (such as Penford), technology, service or product into our existing business and operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. Integration of an acquired company also may require significant management resources that otherwise would be available for ongoing development of our business. Moreover, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition or strategic alliance, and such transactions may not generate anticipated financial results. Future acquisitions could also require us to issue equity securities, incur debt, assume contingent liabilities or amortize expenses related to intangible assets, any of which could harm our business.

 

An inability to contain costs could adversely affect our future profitability and growth.

 

Our future profitability and growth depends on our ability to contain operating costs and per-unit product costs and to maintain and/or implement effective cost control programs, while at the same time maintaining competitive pricing and superior quality products, customer service and support. Our ability to maintain a competitive cost structure depends on continued containment of manufacturing, delivery and administrative costs, as well as the implementation of cost-effective purchasing programs for raw materials, energy and related manufacturing requirements.

 

If we are unable to contain our operating costs and maintain the productivity and reliability of our production facilities, our profitability and growth could be adversely affected.

 

Volatility in the stock market, fluctuations in quarterly operating results and other factors could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

The market price for our common stock may be significantly affected by factors such as our announcement of new products or services or such announcements by our competitors; technological innovation by us, our competitors or other vendors; quarterly variations in our operating results or the operating results of our competitors; general conditions in our or our customers’ markets; and changes in the earnings estimates by analysts or reported results that vary materially from such estimates. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price fluctuations that have affected the market prices of equity securities of many companies that have been unrelated to the operating performance of any individual company.

 

No assurance can be given that we will continue to pay dividends.

 

20



Table of Contents

The payment of dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be subject to our financial results and the availability of surplus funds to pay dividends.

 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None

 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

 

We operate, directly and through our consolidated subsidiaries, 36 manufacturing facilities, all of which are owned. In addition, we lease our corporate headquarters in Westchester, Illinois and our research and development facility in Bridgewater, New Jersey.

The following list details the locations of our manufacturing facilities within each of our four reportable business segments:

 

19



Table of Contents

North America

South America

Asia Pacific

EMEA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cardinal, Ontario, Canada

 

Baradero, Argentina

 

Lane Cove, Australia

 

Cornwala, Pakistan

London, Ontario, Canada

 

Chacabuco, Argentina

 

Shanghai, China

 

Faisalabad, Pakistan

Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada

 

Balsa Nova, Brazil

 

Ichon, South Korea

 

Mehran, Pakistan

San Juan del Rio, Queretaro, Mexico

 

Cabo, Brazil

 

Inchon, South Korea

 

Hamburg, Germany

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

 

Conchal, Brazil

 

Ban Kao Dien, Thailand

 

Goole, United Kingdom

Mexico City, Edo, Mexico

 

Mogi-Guacu, Brazil

 

Kalasin, Thailand

 

 

Stockton, California, U.S.

 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

 

Sikhiu, Thailand

 

 

Bedford Park, Illinois, U.S.

 

Trombudo, Brazil

 

 

 

 

Mapleton, Illinois, U.S.

 

Barranquilla, Colombia

 

 

 

 

Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.

 

Cali, Colombia

 

 

 

 

North Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.

 

Lima, Peru

 

 

 

 

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Charleston, South Carolina, U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We believe our manufacturing facilities are sufficient to meet our current production needs. We have preventive maintenance and de-bottlenecking programs designed to further improve grind capacity and facility reliability.

 

We have electricity co-generation facilities at all of our US and Canadian plants with the exception of Indianapolis, North Kansas City, Stockton, Charleston and Mapleton, as well as at our plants in San Juan del Rio, Mexico; Mexico City, Mexico; Baradero, Argentina; Cali, Colombia; and Balsa Nova and Mogi-Guacu, Brazil, that provide electricity at a lower cost than is available from third parties. We generally own and operate these co-generation facilities, except for the facilities at our Cardinal, Ontario; and Balsa Nova and Mogi-Guacu, Brazil locations, which are owned by, and operated pursuant to co-generation agreements with third parties. Our Stockton, California co-generation facility was previously operated by a third party.  It is not currently generating power for sale to the electrical grid.

 

In recent years, we have made significant capital expenditures to update, expand and improve our facilities, spending $313$276 million in 2012.2014.  We believe these capital expenditures will allow us to operate efficient facilities for the foreseeable future.   We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for 20132015 will approximate $350 million to $400$300 million.

 

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

As previously reported, on April 22, 2011, Western Sugar and two other sugar companies filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Corn Refiners Association (“CRA”) and

21



Table of Contents

certain of its member companies, including us, alleging false and/or misleading statements relating to high fructose corn syrup in violation of the Lanham Act and California’s unfair competition law.  The complaint seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages.  On May 23, 2011, the plaintiffs amended the complaint to add additional plaintiffs, among other reasons.

 

On July 1, 2011, the CRA and the member companies in the case filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint on multiple grounds.  On October 21, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California dismissed all Federal and state claims against us and the other members of the CRA, with leave for the plaintiffs to amend their complaint, and also dismissed all state law claims against the CRA.

 

The state law claims against the CRA were dismissed pursuant to a California law known as the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute, which, according to the court’s opinion, allows early dismissal of meritless first amendment cases aimed at chilling expression through costly, time-consuming litigation.  The court held that the CRA’s statements were protected speech made in a public forum in connection

20



Table of Contents

with an issue of public interest (high fructose corn syrup).  Under the anti-SLAPP statute, the CRA is entitled to recover its attorney’s fees and costs from the plaintiffs.

 

On November 18, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint against certain of the CRA member companies, including us, seeking to reinstate the federal law claims, but not the state law claims, against certain of the CRA member companies, including us.  On December 16, 2011, the CRA member companies filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on multiple grounds. On July 31, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the motion to dismiss for all CRA member companies other than Roquette America, Inc.

 

On September 4, 2012, we and the other CRA member companies that remain defendants in the case filed an answer to the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint that, among other things, added a counterclaim against the Sugar Association.  The counterclaim alleges that the Sugar Association has made false and misleading statements that processed sugar differs from high fructose corn syrup in ways that are beneficial to consumers’ health (i.e., that consumers will be healthier if they consume foods and beverages containing processed sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup).  The counterclaim, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages. Although the counterclaim was initially only filed against the Sugar Association, the Company and the other CRA member companies that remain defendants in the Western Sugar case have reserved the right to add other plaintiffs to the counterclaim in the future.

 

On October 29, 2012, the Sugar Association and the other plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim and certain related portions of the defendants’ answer, each on multiple grounds.  On December 10, 2012, the remaining member companies which are defendants in the case responded to the motion to dismiss the counterclaim.  On January 14, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a reply to the defendants’ response to the motion to dismiss.  TheOn September 16, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the motion to dismiss the counterclaim, which entitles the Company and the other CRA member companies to continue to pursue the counterclaim against the Sugar Association and the other plaintiffs.

On May 23, 2014, the defendants asked the court for leave to amend their counterclaim to add the individual sugar companies as counterclaim defendants.  The motion for leave to amend was denied by the court on August 4, 2014 and this decision is still pendingin the process of being appealed by the defendants.  On August 26, 2014, each of the Company and Tate & Lyle filed motions to disqualify the plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Squire Patton Boggs, due to a conflict of interest arising from Squire Sanders’ merger with Patton Boggs, a firm which represents each of the Company and Tate & Lyle.  In addition, on August 26, 2014, the defendants filed two separate motions for summary judgment, one on the issue of liability and the other on the issue of damages, and the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim.

22



Table of Contents

The motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorneys was argued before the court.court on both November 13 and November 25, 2014.  On February 13, 2015, the court granted the Company’s and Tate & Lyle’s motions to dismiss Squire Patton Boggs due to a conflict of interest.  The schedule for arguing the summary judgment motions and the pre-trial conference have been delayed until May 5, 2015 while the plaintiffs seek replacement counsel in the case.

 

We continue to believe that the second amended complaint is without merit and intend to vigorously defend this case.  In addition, we intend to vigorously pursue our rights in connection with the counterclaim.

 

We are also party to a large number of labor claims relating to our Brazilian operations.  We have reserved an aggregate of approximately $5 million as of December 31, 2014 in respect of these claims.  These labor claims primarily relate to dismissals, severance, health and safety, work schedules and salary adjustments.

We are currently subject to various other claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including certain environmental proceedings.proceedings and other commercial claims.  We do not believe that the results of such legal proceedings, even if unfavorable to us, will be material to us.  There can be no assurance, however, that such claims or suits or those arising in the future, whether taken individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

ITEM 4.      MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5.                         MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Shares of our common stock are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “INGR.”  The number of holders of record of our common stock was 5,8625,078 at January 31, 2013.2015.

 

We have a history of paying quarterly dividends.  The amount and timing of the dividend payment, if any, is based on a number of factors including estimated earnings, financial position and cash flow.  The payment of a dividend is solely at the discretion of our Board of Directors.  Future dividend payments will be subject to our financial results and the availability of funds and statutory surplus funds to pay dividends.

21



Table of Contents

 

The quarterly high and low sales prices for our common stock and cash dividends declared per common share for 20112013 and 20122014 are shown below.

 

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR

 

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

$

58.38

 

$

58.87

 

$

56.57

 

$

66.66

 

 

$

70.00

 

$

77.92

 

$

80.54

 

$

87.20

 

Low

 

50.59

 

47.26

 

45.30

 

54.57

 

 

58.28

 

65.25

 

73.10

 

69.94

 

Per share dividends

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.26

 

Per share dividends declared

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.42

 

$

0.42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

$

52.07

 

$

57.91

 

$

59.50

 

$

53.25

 

 

$

72.58

 

$

74.31

 

$

72.19

 

$

70.48

 

Low

 

44.51

 

50.30

 

38.87

 

36.65

 

 

62.44

 

62.65

 

60.62

 

63.49

 

Per share dividends

 

$

0.14

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.16

 

$

0.20

 

Per share dividends declared

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.38

 

$

0.42

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:

 

The following table summarizes information with respect to our purchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2012.2014.

 

(shares in thousands)

Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased

Average
Price
Paid
per Share

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs

Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that may yet
be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
at end of period

Oct. 1 — Oct. 31, 2012

3,385 shares

Nov. 1 — Nov. 30, 2012

3,385 shares

Dec. 1 — Dec. 31, 2012

3,385 shares

Total

(shares in thousands)

 

Total
Number
of Shares 
Purchased

 

Average
Price
Paid
per Share

 

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased as 
part of Publicly 
Announced Plans or 
Programs

 

Maximum Number 
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of 
Shares that may yet 
be Purchased Under 
the Plans or Programs 
at end of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oct. 1 – Oct. 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

847 shares

 

Nov. 1 – Nov. 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

847 shares

 

Dec. 1 – Dec. 31, 2014

 

672

 

78.45

 

672

 

5,176 shares

*

Total

 

672

 

78.45

 

672

 

 

 

 


*On November 17, 2010, ourDecember 12, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized an extension of oura new stock repurchase program permitting usthe Company to purchase up to 5 million shares of ourits outstanding common stockshares from January 1, 2015 through November 30, 2015.December 31, 2019.  The Company’s previously authorized stock repurchase program was authorized bypermitting the Boardpurchase of Directors on November 7, 2007 and would have expired on November 30, 2010.  Asup to 4 million shares has been almost fully utilized with 176 thousand shares available to be repurchased as of December 31, 2012, we had repurchased 1.6 million shares under the program, leaving 3.4 million shares available for repurchase.2014.

 

2224



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6.                         SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

Selected financial data is provided below.

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010 (a)

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010 (a)

 

Summary of operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

$

4,367

 

$

3,672

 

$

3,944

 

 

$

5,668

 

$

6,328

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

$

4,367

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

428

(b)

416

(c)

169 

(d)

41

(e)

267

 

 

355

(b)

396

 

428

(c)

416

(d)

169

(e)

Net earnings per common share of Ingredion:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

5.59

(b)

$

5.44

(c)

$

2.24

(d)

$

0.55

(e)

$

3.59

 

 

$

4.82

(b)

$

5.14

 

$

5.59

(c)

$

5.44

(d)

$

2.24

(e)

Diluted

 

$

5.47

(b)

$

5.32

(c)

$

2.20

(d)

$

0.54

(e)

$

3.52

 

 

$

4.74

(b)

$

5.05

 

$

5.47

(c)

$

5.32

(d)

$

2.20

(e)

Cash dividends declared per common share of Ingredion

 

$

0.92

 

$

0.66

 

$

0.56

 

$

0.56

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

1.68

 

$

1.56

 

$

0.92

 

$

0.66

 

$

0.56

 

Balance sheet data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

$

1,427

 

$

1,176

 

$

881

 

$

450

 

$

415

 

 

$

1,423

 

$

1,394

 

$

1,427

 

$

1,176

 

$

881

 

Property, plant and equipment-net

 

2,193

 

2,156

 

2,156

 

1,594

 

1,470

 

 

2,073

 

2,156

 

2,193

 

2,156

 

2,156

 

Total assets

 

5,592

 

5,317

 

5,040

 

2,952

 

3,207

 

 

5,091

 

5,360

 

5,592

 

5,317

 

5,040

 

Long-term debt

 

1,724

 

1,801

 

1,681

 

408

 

660

 

 

1,804

 

1,717

 

1,724

 

1,801

 

1,681

 

Total debt

 

1,800

 

1,949

 

1,769

 

544

 

866

 

 

1,827

 

1,810

 

1,800

 

1,949

 

1,769

 

Redeemable common stock

 

 

 

 

14

 

14

 

Total equity (f)

 

$

2,459

 

$

2,133

 

$

2,001

 

$

1,704

 

$

1,406

 

 

$

2,207

 

$

2,429

 

$

2,459

 

$

2,133

 

$

2,001

 

Shares outstanding, year end

 

77.0

 

75.9

 

76.0

 

74.9

 

74.5

 

 

71.3

 

74.3

 

77.0

 

75.9

 

76.0

 

Additional data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

$

211

 

$

211

 

$

155

 

$

130

 

$

128

 

 

$

195

 

$

194

 

$

211

 

$

211

 

$

155

 

Capital expenditures

 

313

 

263

 

159

 

146

 

228

 

 

276

 

298

 

313

 

263

 

159

 

 


(a)   Includes National Starch from October 1, 2010 forward.

 

(b)   Includes a $33 million impairment charge ($0.44 per diluted common share) to write-off goodwill at our Southern Cone of South America reporting unit and after-tax costs of $1 million ($0.02 per diluted common share) related to the pending Penford acquisition.

(bc)  Includes a$13 $13 million benefit from the reversal of a valuation allowance that had been recorded against net deferred tax assets of our Korean subsidiary ($0.16 per diluted common share), after-tax charges for impaired assets and restructuring costs of $23 million ($0.29 per diluted common share),an after-tax gain from a change in a North American benefit plan of $3 million ($0.04 per

25



Table of Contents

diluted common share), after-tax costs of $3 million ($0.03 per diluted common share) relating to the integration of National Starch and an after-tax gain from the sale of land sale of $2 million ($0.02 per diluted common share).  See Notes 3, 4 8 and 98 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

23



Table of Contents

 

(cd)  Includes a $58 million NAFTA award ($0.75 per diluted common share) received from the Government of the United Mexican States, an after-tax gain of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) pertaining to a change in a postretirement plan, after-tax charges of $7 million for restructuring costs ($0.08 per diluted common share) and after-tax costs of $21 million ($0.26 per diluted common share) relating to the integration of National Starch.   See Notes 3, 4, 9 and 13 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

 

(d)(e)   Includes $14 million of after-tax charges for bridge loan and other financing costs ($0.18 per diluted common share), after-tax acquisition-related costs related to the National Starch acquisition of $26 million ($0.34 per diluted common share), after-tax charges of $22 million ($0.29 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and other costs primarily associated with our operations in Chile and after-tax charges of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) relating to the sale of National Starch inventory that was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules. See Notes 3, 4 and 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

(e)  Includes after-tax charges for impaired assets and restructuring costs of $110 million, or $1.47 per diluted common share.

 

(f)   Includes non-controlling interests.

 

2426



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 7.                         MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

OVERVIEW

 

We are a major supplier of high-quality food and industrial ingredients to customers around the world.  We have 36 manufacturing plants located throughoutin North America, South America, Asia Pacific and Europe, the Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”), and we manage and operate our businesses at a regional level.  We believe this approach provides us with a unique understanding of the cultures and product requirements in each of the geographic markets in which we operate, bringing added value to our customers.  Our ingredients are used by customers in the food, beverage, animal feed, paper and corrugating, and brewing industries, among others.

 

Our Strategic Blueprint continues to guide our decision-making and strategic choices with an emphasis on value-added ingredients for our customers. The foundation of our Strategic Blueprint is operational excellence, which includes our focus on safety, quality and continuous improvement.  We see growth opportunities in three areas.  First is organic growth as we work to expand our current business.  Second, we are focused on broadening our ingredient portfolio of on-trend products through internal and external business development.  Finally, we look for growth from geographic expansion as we pursue extension of our reach to new locations.  The ultimate goal of these strategies and actions is to deliver increased shareholder value.

Critical success factors in our business include managing our significant manufacturing costs, including costs for corn, other raw materials and utilities.  In addition, due to our global operations we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  We use derivative financial instruments, when appropriate, for the purpose of minimizing the risks and/or costs associated with fluctuations in certain raw material and energy costs, foreign exchange rates and interest rates.  Also, the capital intensive nature of our business requires that we generate significant cash flow over time in order to selectively reinvest in our operations and grow organically, as well as through strategic acquisitions and alliances.  We utilize certain key financial metrics relating to working capital, debt and return on capital employed to monitor our progress toward achieving our strategic business objectives (see section entitled “Key Financial Performance Metrics”).

 

2012 was a strong year for us as we achieved Company record highs for net sales, operating income,Our net income per diluted common share for 2014 declined 6 percent from 2013 due to the recording of a non-cash impairment charge of $33 million to write-off goodwill at our Southern Cone of South America business unit and $2 million of costs related to our pending acquisition of Penford Corporation.  Without these items, our diluted earnings per common share would have increased 3 percent from 2013.  Our operating income, excluding the impairment charge and acquisition costs, was up slightly from a year ago as growth in EMEA, Asia Pacific and reduced corporate expenses were substantially offset by weaker results in North America and South America.  In North America, our largest segment, operating income declined 6 percent primarily reflecting the unfavorable impact of harsh winter weather conditions on our business in the first quarter of 2014.  South America operating income fell 7 percent driven by the impact of difficult economic conditions in the Southern Cone of South America and unfavorable currency translation driven by the stronger US dollar.  Operating income grew in both Asia Pacific and EMEA reflecting volume and gross margin growth.  Given that both Asia Pacific and EMEA possess strong specialty product portfolios, we remain confident regarding future growth in these segments.

Our operating cash flow of $731 million for 2014 grew 18 percent from 2013.  We continue to use our operating cash flow to invest in our business and reward shareholders.  Our acquisition of Penford Corporation (see below) is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015 pending regulatory approval.  It should be immediately accretive to earnings and will enhance our specialty ingredient product portfolio.  Additionally, we continue to make strategic investments in research and development and capital for our specialty product portfolio.  During 2014 we repurchased 3.8 million of our common shares and our board of directors recently authorized the repurchase of an additional five million shares over the next five years.  We also continued to pay quarterly cash dividends to our shareholders. Our balance sheet is strong and positions us well for future strategic initiatives.

27



Table of Contents

Looking ahead, we anticipate that our operating income and net income will grow in 2015 compared to 2014.  In North America, we expect operating income to increase as we do not expect a repetition of the adverse weather effect that we experienced in the first quarter of 2014 and to benefit from anticipated improvement in price/product price mix.  In South America, we expect modest operating income growth driven primarily by higher product selling prices and volume growth.  Despite challenging macroeconomic conditions, we achieved sales volumegood cost management. We anticipate slow economic growth and continued foreign exchange headwinds in that segment for 2015.  In Argentina, the political and economic environment remains volatile, challenging and uncertain, and we currently believe that our full year 2015 operating income in that country will be flat relative to 2014.  Operating income in both Asia Pacific and EMEA should continue to grow in 2015, despite currency headwinds associated with a stronger US dollar.  We anticipate that this growth will be driven primarily by improved price/product price improvementsmix from our specialty ingredient product portfolio and effective cost control.

On October 14, 2014, we entered into a definitive agreement to cover higher raw material costsacquire Penford Corporation (“Penford”), a US-based leader in specialty ingredients for food and foreign currency headwinds.  Additionally, we further enhanced our liquidity and financial flexibilitynon-food applications.  The acquisition has been approved by selling $300 millionthe boards of 1.80 percent five-year Senior Notesdirectors of both companies and by entering into a new five-year $1 billionthe shareholders of Penford.  It is subject to approval by regulators as well as to other customary closing conditions.  The purchase price is estimated to be $340 million, including the assumption of debt.  We expect to fund the acquisition of Penford with available cash and proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.  We also completed our integration

Penford, headquartered in Centennial, Colorado had net sales of $444 million in fiscal year 2014.  Penford employs approximately 443 people and operates six plants in the United States, all of which manufacture specialty starches.  See Note 3 of the National Starch acquisition and we look forwardnotes to continued business growth in 2013.the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

We currently expect that our available cash balances, future cash flow from operations and borrowing capacity under our credit facilities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our anticipated capital expenditures, dividends and other investing and/or financing strategiesactivities for the foreseeable future.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

We have significant operations in North America, South America, Asia Pacific and EMEA.  For most of our foreign subsidiaries, the local foreign currency is the functional currency.  Accordingly, revenues and expenses denominated in the functional currencies of these subsidiaries are translated into US dollars (“USD”) at the applicable average exchange rates for the period.  Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect the US dollar amounts of our foreign subsidiaries’ revenues and expenses.  The impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, where significant, is provided below.

 

20122014 Compared to 20112013

 

Net Income attributable to Ingredion.  Net income attributable to Ingredion for 2012 increased2014 decreased to $428$355 million, or $5.47$4.74 per diluted common share, from 2011$396 million, or $5.05 per diluted common share in 2013.  Our results for 2014 include an impairment charge of $33 million ($0.44 per diluted common share) to write-off goodwill at our Southern Cone of South America reporting unit (see Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information) and after-tax costs of $2 million ($0.02 per diluted common share) related to our pending acquisition of Penford.  Without the impairment charge and acquisition costs, our net income would have declined 2 percent from 2013, while our diluted earnings per share would have grown by 3 percent.  This improvement in our diluted earnings per common share was driven by the favorable impact of our share repurchases.

Net Sales.  Net sales for 2014 decreased to $5.67 billion from $6.33 billion in 2013, primarily reflecting reduced net sales in North America driven by lower raw material costs (primarily corn) that were reflected in our product pricing.

28



Table of Contents

A summary of net sales by reportable business segment is shown below:

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Increase
(Decrease)

 

% Change

 

North America

 

$

3,093

 

$

3,647

 

$

(554

)

(15

)%

South America

 

1,203

 

1,334

 

(131

)

(10

)%

Asia Pacific

 

794

 

805

 

(11

)

(1

)%

EMEA

 

578

 

542

 

36

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

5,668

 

$

6,328

 

$

(660

)

(10

)%

The decrease in net sales was driven by an 8 percent price/product mix decline primarily attributable to lower raw material costs and unfavorable currency translation of 4 percent due to the stronger US dollar.  A 2 percent volume increase partially offset the unfavorable impacts of the reduced selling prices and currency translation.

Net sales in North America decreased 15 percent, primarily reflecting a 16 percent price/product mix decline driven principally by lower raw material costs.  A 2 percent volume improvement more than offset unfavorable currency translation of 1 percent in Canada.  Net sales in South America decreased 10 percent, as a 16 percent decline attributable to weaker foreign currencies more than offset price/product mix improvement of 6 percent.  Volume in the segment was flat.  Asia Pacific net sales declined 1 percent, as a 5 percent price/product mix decline and unfavorable currency translation of 2 percent, more than offset volume growth of 6 percent.  EMEA net sales grew 7 percent reflecting price/product mix improvement of 3 percent, 3 percent volume growth and favorable currency translation of 1 percent primarily attributable to a stronger British Pound Sterling.

Cost of Sales.  Cost of sales for 2014 decreased 12 percent to $4.55 billion from $5.20 billion in 2013.  This reduction primarily reflects lower raw material costs and the effects of currency translation.  Gross corn costs per ton for 2014 decreased approximately 24 percent from 2013, driven by lower market prices for corn.  Currency translation caused cost of sales for 2014 to decrease approximately 4 percent from 2013, reflecting the impact of weaker foreign currencies, particularly in South America.  Our gross profit margin for 2014 was 20 percent, compared to 18 percent in 2013.  Despite reduced selling prices driven by lower corn costs, we have generally maintained per unit gross profit dollar levels, resulting in the improved gross profit margin percentages.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for 2014 declined to $525 million from $534 million in 2013.  The decrease was driven principally by foreign currency weakness which more than offset slightly higher compensation-related costs.  Currency translation caused SG&A expenses for 2014 to decrease approximately 4 percent from 2013.  SG&A expenses represented 47 percent of gross profit in 2014, consistent with 2013.

Other Income-net.  Other income-net of $24 million for 2014 increased from other income-net of $16 million in 2013.  This increase primarily reflects $7 million of income associated with a tax indemnification agreement relating to a subsidiary acquired from Akzo Nobel N.V. (“Akzo”) in 2010 and a $3 million gain from the sale of our idled plant in Kenya.  In the third quarter of 2014, we recognized a charge to our income tax provision for an unfavorable income tax audit result at the former Akzo subsidiary related to a pre-acquisition period for which we are indemnified by Akzo.  The costs incurred by the acquired subsidiary are recorded in our provision for income taxes while the reimbursement from Akzo under the indemnification agreement is recorded as other income.  The impact on our net income is zero.

29



Table of Contents

Operating Income.  A summary of operating income is shown below:

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Variance

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
% Change

 

North America

 

$

375

 

$

401

 

$

(26

)

(6

)%

South America

 

108

 

116

 

(8

)

(7

)%

Asia Pacific

 

103

 

97

 

6

 

6

%

EMEA

 

95

 

74

 

21

 

28

%

Corporate expenses

 

(65

)

(75

)

10

 

13

%

Write-off of impaired assets

 

(33

)

 

(33

)

nm

 

Acquisition costs

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

nm

 

Operating income

 

$

581

 

$

613

 

$

(32

)

(5

)%

Operating income for 2014 decreased to $581 million from $613 million in 2013.  Operating income for 2014 includes a $33 million charge to write-off impaired goodwill at our Southern Cone of South America reporting unit and $2 million of costs associated with our pending acquisition of Penford.  Without the impairment charge and acquisition costs, operating income for 2014 would have been essentially flat with 2013.  Our operating income primarily reflects earnings growth in EMEA and Asia Pacific along with reduced corporate expenses, which basically offset lower earnings in North America and South America.  Unfavorable currency translation attributable to a stronger US dollar reduced operating income by approximately $28 million from 2013.

North America operating income decreased 6 percent to $375 million from $401 million in 2013.  The decline primarily reflects our weak first quarter 2014 results that were negatively impacted by harsh winter weather conditions that caused higher energy, transportation and production costs.  Additionally, currency translation associated with a weaker Canadian dollar caused operating income to decrease by approximately $7 million in North America.  We are pursuing insurance recoveries for the property and business interruption loss that was caused by the harsh winter weather.  South America operating income decreased 7 percent to $108 million from $116 million in 2013.  The decrease was driven by weaker results in the Southern Cone of South America, which more than offset earnings growth in Brazil.  The operating income decline in the Southern Cone of South America primarily reflects the impact of higher production costs and our inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover the impacts of inflation and currency devaluation.  Translation effects associated with weaker South American currencies (particularly the Argentine Peso and Brazilian Real) caused operating income to decrease by approximately $18 million.  We currently anticipate that our business in South America will continue to be challenged by difficult economic conditions in 2015.  Asia Pacific operating income grew 6 percent to $103 million from $97 million in 2013.  This increase was driven principally by volume growth in our Asian business and lower corn costs in South Korea.   Unfavorable translation effects associated with weaker Asian currencies caused Asia Pacific operating income to decrease by approximately $3 million.  EMEA operating income rose 28 percent to $95 million from $74 million in 2013.  The improved earnings primarily reflect improved selling prices, volume growth and manufacturing efficiencies resulting from capital investments, particularly in Europe, and lower energy costs in Pakistan.

Financing Costs-net.  Financing costs-net decreased to $61 million in 2014 from $66 million in 2013.  The decline reflects a decrease in interest expense, an increase in interest income and a reduction in foreign currency transaction losses.   The reduction in interest expense reflects lower average interest rates driven by the effect of our interest rate swaps, which more than offset the impact of higher average borrowings.  The increase in interest income was driven principally by higher interest rates on our cash investments.

Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax rate was 30.2 percent in 2014, as compared to 26.3 percent in 2013.  In the fourth quarter of 2014 we impaired goodwill in our Southern Cone subsidiaries and recorded a charge of $33 million without a tax benefit, which increased the effective tax rate by 1.8 percentage points.  We use the US dollar as the functional currency for our subsidiaries in Mexico.  Because of the decline in the value of the Mexican peso versus the US dollar, primarily late in 2014, the Mexican tax provision includes an unfavorable impact of approximately $7 million, or 1.3 percentage points in our effective tax rate, primarily associated with foreign currency transaction gains for local income tax purposes on net US dollar monetary assets held in Mexico for which there is no corresponding gain in our pre-tax income.  The tax provision also includes approximately $7 million for an unfavorable audit result at a National

30



Table of Contents

Starch subsidiary related to a pre-acquisition period for which we are indemnified by Akzo.  Additionally, the 2014 tax provision includes $12 million of net favorable reversals of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapsing of the statute of limitations.   We have significant operations in Canada, Mexico and Thailand where the statutory tax rates are 25 percent, 30 percent and 20 percent, respectively.  In addition, our subsidiary in Brazil has a lower effective tax rate of 26 percent including local tax incentives.

Our effective tax rate for 2013 includes approximately $2 million of tax benefits related to the January 2, 2013 enactment of the US American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.  We also received a favorable tax determination from the Canadian courts during 2013 that resulted in approximately $4 million of tax benefits related to prior years, and an additional $2 million related to 2013.  In addition, in 2013, we recognized approximately $11 million of tax benefits related to net changes in previously unrecognized tax benefits and global provision to return adjustments.

Without the impact of the items described above, our effective tax rates for 2014 and 2013 would have been approximately 28 percent and 30 percent, respectively.  See Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests.  Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $8 million in 2014, up from $7 million in 2013.  The increase primarily reflects improved net income at our non-wholly-owned operation in Pakistan.

Comprehensive Income.  We recorded comprehensive income of $156 million in 2014, as compared with $288 million in 2013.  The decrease in comprehensive income primarily reflects a $75 million unfavorable variance relating mainly to the reduced funded status of our pension and postretirement benefit plans associated with lower discount rates and a revised mortality table, a $58 million unfavorable variance in the cumulative translation adjustment and our lower net income of $416$40 million, partially offset by a $44 million favorable variance associated with our cash-flow hedging activity.  The unfavorable variance in the cumulative translation adjustment reflects a greater weakening in end of period foreign currencies relative to the US dollar, as compared to a year ago.

2013 Compared to 2012

Net Income attributable to Ingredion.  Net income attributable to Ingredion for 2013 decreased to $396 million, or $5.32$5.05 per diluted common share, from 2012 net income of $428 million, or $5.47 per diluted common share.  Our results for 2012 includeincluded after-tax charges of $16 million ($0.20 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and restructuring costs in Kenya, China and Colombia (see Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information), after-tax restructuring charges of $7 million ($0.09 per diluted common share) relating to our manufacturing optimization plan in North America, and after-tax costs of $3 million ($0.03 per diluted common share) associated with our integration of National Starch.  Additionally, our 2012 results includeincluded the reversal of a $13 million valuation allowance that had been recorded against net deferred tax assets of our Korean subsidiary ($0.16 per diluted

25



Table of Contents

common share), an after-tax gain from a change in a benefit plan of $3 million ($0.04 per diluted common share) and an after-tax gain from the sale of land of $2 million ($0.02 per diluted common share).  Our results for 2011 included a $58 million NAFTA award ($0.75 per diluted common share) received from the Government of the United Mexican States (see Note 13 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information) and an after-tax gain of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) pertaining to a change in a postretirement plan (see Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information).  Additionally, our 2011 results included after-tax costs of $21 million ($0.26 per diluted common share) relating to the integration of National Starch and after-tax restructuring charges of $7 million ($0.08 per diluted common share) associated with our manufacturing optimization plan in North America.

 

Without the impairment/restructuring charges, the reversal of the Korean deferred tax asset valuation allowance, the gain from the benefit plan change, the gain from the land sale and the integration costs in 2012, and the integration costs, restructuring charges, NAFTA award and gain from the postretirement plan change in 2011, net income and diluted earnings per common share for 20122013 would have grown 19declined 9 percent from 2011.2012.  This decline in net income growth primarily reflects an increase inlower operating income driven principally by significantly reduced operating income in North America and, to a lesser extent, in Asia Pacific.  Reduced financing costs and a lower effective income tax rate also contributed to the improved earnings.South America.

 

Net Sales.  Net sales for 2012 increased2013 decreased to $6.33 billion from $6.53 billion from $6.22 billion in 2011, as2012, primarily reflecting reduced sales growth in North America and Asia Pacific more than offset declines in South America and EMEA.North America.

31



Table of Contents

 

A summary of net sales by reportable business segment is shown below:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Increase
(Decrease)

 

% Change

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Increase
(Decrease)

 

% Change

 

North America

 

$

3,741

 

$

3,356

 

$

385

 

11

%

 

$

3,647

 

$

3,741

 

$

(94

)

(3

)%

South America

 

1,462

 

1,569

 

(107

)

(7

)%

 

1,334

 

1,462

 

(128

)

(9

)%

Asia Pacific

 

816

 

764

 

52

 

7

%

 

805

 

816

 

(11

)

(1

)%

EMEA

 

513

 

530

 

(17

)

(3

)%

 

542

 

513

 

29

 

6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

$

313

 

5

%

 

$

6,328

 

$

6,532

 

$

(204

)

(3

)%

 

The increasedecrease in net sales primarily reflects improved price/product mix of 6a 3 percent and volume growth of 2 percent driven by stronger demand from our beverage, brewingreduction and food customers, which more than offset unfavorable currency translation of 3 percent attributable to weaker foreign currencies relative to the US dollar.dollar, which more than offset improved price/product mix of 3 percent.

 

Net sales in North America increased 11decreased 3 percent, reflectingas a 4 percent volume decline and slightly unfavorable currency translation attributable to a weaker Canadian dollar more than offset improved price/product mix of 7 percent and volume growth of 4 percent driven by stronger demand from our beverage, brewing and food customers.  Improved2 percent.  Increased selling prices helped to offset higher corn costs.  Net sales in South America decreased 79 percent, as a 910 percent decline attributable to weaker foreign currencies and a 32 percent volume reduction more than offset a 53 percent price/product mix improvement.  The volume declinereduction primarily reflects a combination of weaker economic activityconditions, particularly in the segmentSouthern Cone of South America and a transportation strikein Brazil, and labor issues that impacted our customersreduced sales to the brewing industry where excess industry capacity resulted in Argentina earlierweaker brewery demand for high maltose in the year.Brazil.  Asia Pacific net sales grew 7declined 1 percent, as a volume growthdecline of 52 percent and slightly unfavorable currency translation effects more than offset a 1 percent price/product mix improvement.  The volume reduction reflects the effect of the fourth quarter 2012 sale of our investment in our Chinese non-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, Shouguang Golden Far East Modified Starch Co., Ltd. (“GFEMS”).  Without net sales of $23 million from GFEMS in 2012, Asia Pacific net sales for 2013 would have increased 2 percent and volume would have grown 1 percent from a year ago.  EMEA net sales grew 6 percent reflecting price/product mix improvement of 38 percent and 1 percent volume growth, which more than offset unfavorable currency translation of 13 percent.  EMEA netWithout an $11 million sales decreased 3 percent, as unfavorable currency translation of 6 percent and a 1 percent volume reduction resulting primarily fromattributable to the closure of our manufacturing plant in Kenya, more than offset a 4EMEA net sales for 2013 would have increased approximately 8 percent price/product mix improvement.and volume would have grown approximately 3 percent from 2012.

 

Cost of Sales.  Cost of sales for 2012 increased 42013 decreased 2 percent to $5.20 billion from $5.29 billion from $5.09 billion in 2011.  The increase primarily reflects2012.  Higher raw material costs were more than offset by reduced volume, the effects of currency translation and the impacts of continued cost savings focus.  Pricing actions by us limited the unfavorable impact of higher cornraw material costs and volume growth.on our operating income.  Currency translation caused cost of sales for 20122013 to decrease

26



Table of Contents

approximately 3 percent from 2011,2012, reflecting the impact of weaker foreign currencies.currencies, particularly in South America.  Gross corn costs per ton for 20122013 increased approximately 41 percent from 2011,2012, driven by higher market prices for corn.  Additionally, energy costs increased approximately 2 percent from 2011;2012, primarily reflecting higher costs in Pakistan, where power shortages due to energy infrastructure problems in that country drove costs higher.Korea and Pakistan.  Our gross profit margin for 20122013 was 1918 percent, compared to 1819 percent in 2011.2012, primarily reflecting lower gross profits in South America.

 

Selling, General and Administrative ExpensesSelling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)&A expenses for 2012 increased2013 declined to $534 million from $556 million from $543 million in 2011.2012.  The increase primarily reflects higher compensation-related costs; lower integration expensesdecrease was driven principally by foreign currency weakness and the impact of weaker foreign currencies partially offset these increases.cost savings initiatives.  Currency translation caused operatingSG&A expenses for 20122013 to decrease approximately 3 percent from 2011.2012.  SG&A expenses represented 9approximately 8 percent of net sales in both 2012 and 2011.  Without integration costs, SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net sales, would have been 8 percent in both 2012 and 2011.2013, consistent with 2012.

 

Other Income-net.  Other income-net of $22$16 million for 20122013 decreased from other income-net of $98$22 million in 2011.2012.  This decrease primarily reflects the effects of the $58 million NAFTA award received from the Government of the United Mexican States in the first quarter of 2011 and a $30 million gain associated with a fourth quarter 2011 postretirement benefit plan change.  A $5 million gain from a change in a North America benefit plan in North America and a $2 million gain from a land sale, both of which were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 partially offset these declines.2012.

32



Table of Contents

 

Operating Income.  A summary of operating income is shown below:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Variance

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
% Change

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Variance

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
% Change

 

North America

 

$

408

 

$

322

 

$

86

 

27

%

 

$

401

 

$

408

 

$

(7

)

(2

)%

South America

 

198

 

203

 

(5

)

(2

)%

 

116

 

198

 

(82

)

(41

)%

Asia Pacific

 

95

 

79

 

16

 

20

%

 

97

 

95

 

2

 

2

%

EMEA

 

78

 

84

 

(6

)

(7

)%

 

74

 

78

 

(4

)

(6

)%

Corporate expenses

 

(78

)

(64

)

(14

)

(22

)%

 

(75

)

(78

)

3

 

4

%

Restructuring/impairment charges

 

(36

)

(10

)

(26

)

(260

)%

 

 

(36

)

36

 

nm

 

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

5

 

30

 

(25

)

(83

)%

 

 

5

 

(5

)

nm

 

Integration costs

 

(4

)

(31

)

27

 

87

%

 

 

(4

)

4

 

nm

 

Gain from sale of land

 

2

 

 

2

 

nm

 

 

 

2

 

(2

)

nm

 

NAFTA award

 

 

58

 

(58

)

nm

 

Operating income

 

$

668

 

$

671

 

$

(3

)

%

 

$

613

 

$

668

 

$

(55

)

(8

)%

 

Operating income for 20122013 declined slightly to $613 million from $668 million from $671 million in 2011.2012.  Operating income for 2012 includesincluded $20 million of charges for impaired assets and restructuring costs in Kenya, $11 million of restructuring charges to reduce the carrying value of certain equipment associated with our manufacturing optimization plan in North America, $5 million of charges for impaired assets in China and Colombia, and $4 million of costs pertaining to the integration of National Starch.  Additionally, operating income for 2012 includesincluded the $5 million gain from the benefit plan change in North America and athe $2 million gain from the sale of land.  Operating income for 2011 included the $58 million NAFTA award, a $30 million gain from a change in a postretirement plan, $31 million of costs pertaining to the integration of National Starch and $10 million of restructuring charges associated with our North American manufacturing optimization plan.  Without the impairment/restructuring charges, integration costs, the NAFTA award, the gainsgain from the changes in benefit plans,plan change and the gain from the land sale, operating income for 20122013 would have increased 12decreased 13 percent, primarily reflecting strong earnings growthreduced operating income in North America and, to a lesser extent, in Asia Pacific.South America.  Unfavorable currency translation associated with weaker foreign currencies caused operating income to decline by approximately $30$21 million from 2011.  2012.

North America operating income increased 27decreased 2 percent to $401 million from $408 million from $322 million in 2011.2012.  Lower volumes due to reduced customer demand drove the operating income decline.  Improved product selling prices and volume growth helped to offset higher corn costs.manufacturing cost saving initiatives limited the unfavorable impact of the reduced sales volume.  Currency translation associated with a weaker Canadian dollar caused operating income to decrease by approximately $1$3 million in North America.  South America operating income decreased 241 percent to $116 million from $198 million in 2012.  The decrease was driven by significantly weaker results in the Southern Cone of South America and in Brazil.  Our inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover higher corn, energy and labor costs, primarily in Argentina, and the reduced absorption of fixed manufacturing costs as a result of lower sales volumes due to soft demand from $203 million in 2011.  Improved product price/mix largely offseta weaker economy, drove the unfavorable impacts of higher local product costs; translationearnings decline.  Translation effects associated with weaker South American currencies (particularly the Argentine Peso and Brazilian Real), which had a $22 million unfavorable impact on the segment; and lower volumes due caused operating income to soft demand from a weaker economy.

decrease by approximately $14 million.  27



Table of Contents

Asia Pacific operating income rose 202 percent to $97 million from $95 million from $79 million in 2011.2012.  This increase primarily reflects salesorganic volume growth and improved price/mix,slightly higher product selling prices, which more than offset higher local production costs and the impact of weaker foreign currencies.  Unfavorable translation effects associated with weaker foreign currencies caused Asia Pacific operating income to decrease by approximately $1 million.  EMEA operating income decreased 76 percent to $74 million from $78 million from $84 million in 2011,2012.  The decrease primarily reflecting unfavorable currency translation.reflects the impacts of weaker foreign currencies and higher local production and energy costs, which more than offset improved product price/mix and volume growth.  Translation effects associated with weaker foreign currencies (particularly the Pakistan Rupee) caused EMEA operating income to decrease by approximately $6$3 million. While our installation of equipment helped to mitigate energy issues somewhat, energy infrastructure in Pakistan remains problematic and we continue to face challenges resulting from the power shortages in that country.

 

Financing Costs-net.  Financing costs-net decreased slightly to $66 million in 2013 from $67 million in 2012 from $78 million in 2011.2012.  The decrease primarily reflects reduced interest expense driven by lower average borrowings and interest rates and an increase in interest income of $5 million attributable to our higher cash balances, a $4 million decrease in interest expense drivenpartially offset by lower borrowing rates and a $2 million reductionan increase in foreign currency transaction losses.

 

Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax rate was 26.3 percent in 2013, as compared to 27.8 percent in 2012, as compared2012.  Our effective tax rate for 2013 includes approximately $2 million of tax benefits related to 28.7 percentthe January 2, 2013 enactment of the US American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.  The Company also received a favorable tax determination from the Canadian courts during 2013 that resulted in 2011.approximately $4 million of tax benefits related to prior years, and an

33



Table of Contents

additional $2 million related to the current year.  In addition, the Company recognized approximately $11 million of tax favorability related to net changes in previously unrecognized tax benefits and global provision to return adjustments.  Our effective income tax rate for 2012 includes the effects of the discrete reversal of a $13 million valuation allowance that had been recorded against net deferred tax assets of our Korean subsidiary, the recognition of an income tax benefit of $8 million related to our $20 million restructuring charge in Kenya and the associated tax write-off of the investment.  Additionally, in 2012 we recorded a $4 million pretaxpre-tax charge related to the disposition of our non wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary in China,GFEMS, which is not expected to produce a realizable tax benefit.  Our effective income tax rate for 2011 includes the benefit of the one-time recognition of tax free income related to the NAFTA award in pretax income, which lowered our effective income tax rate by 3.5 percentage points.  Without the impact of the items described above, our effective tax rates for 20122013 and 20112012 would have been approximately 30 percent and 32 percent, respectively.in both periods.  See also Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests.  Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $6 million in 2012, down from $7 million in 2011. The decrease reflects lower earnings at our non wholly-owned operations in Pakistan and China.

Comprehensive Income.  We recorded comprehensive income of $366 million in 2012, as compared with $193 million in 2011.  The increase primarily reflects a $97 million favorable variance in the currency translation adjustment and a $94 million favorable variance associated with our cash-flow hedging activity.  The favorable variance in the currency translation adjustment reflects a more moderate weakening in end of period foreign currencies relative to the US dollar in 2012, as compared to a year ago, when end of period foreign currency depreciation was more significant.

2011 Compared to 2010

On October 1, 2010, we acquired National Starch, a global provider of specialty starches.  The results of National Starch are included in our consolidated financial results from October 1, 2010 forward.  As a result, there are significant fluctuations in our financial statements as compared to 2010.  While we identify significant fluctuations due to the acquisition, our discussion below also addresses results of operations absent the impact of the National Starch acquisition and acquired operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, where appropriate, to provide a more comparable and meaningful analysis.

Net Income attributable to Ingredion.  Net income attributable to Ingredion for 2011 more than doubled to $416 million, or $5.32 per diluted common share, from 2010 net income of $169 million, or $2.20 per diluted common share.  Our results for 2011 included a $58 million NAFTA award ($0.75 per diluted common share) received from the Government of the United Mexican States (see Note 13 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information) and an after-tax gain of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) pertaining to a change in a postretirement plan (see Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information).

28



Table of Contents

Additionally, our 2011 results included after-tax costs of $21 million ($0.26 per diluted common share) relating to the integration of National Starch and after-tax restructuring charges of $7 million ($0.08 per diluted common share) associated with our manufacturing optimization plan in North America.  Our 2010 results included after-tax acquisition-related costs of $26 million ($0.34 per diluted common share), after-tax restructuring charges of $22 million ($0.29 per diluted common share) for impaired assets and other costs primarily associated with the closing of our plant in Chile, after-tax costs of $18 million ($0.23 per diluted common share) relating to the sale of National Starch inventory that was adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules and after-tax charges of $14 million for bridge loan and other financing costs ($0.18 per diluted common share) related to the acquisition of National Starch.  See also Note 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information pertaining to the asset impairments and restructurings.

Without the integration costs, restructuring charges, the NAFTA award, and the gain from the postretirement plan change in 2011 and the impairment, restructuring, acquisition-related costs and bridge loan and other financing expenses in 2010, net income for 2011 would have grown 47 percent from 2010, while our diluted earnings per common share would have risen 44 percent.  This net income growth primarily reflects an increase in operating income driven by earnings of the acquired National Starch operations and, to a lesser extent, organic earnings growth.  Higher financing costs partially offset the increased operating income.

Net Sales.  Net sales for 2011 increased to $6.22 billion from $4.37 billion in 2010, as sales grew in each of our segments.

A summary of net sales by reportable business segment is shown below:

(in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Increase

 

% Change

 

North America

 

$

3,356

 

$

2,439

 

$

917

 

38

%

South America

 

1,569

 

1,241

 

328

 

26

%

Asia Pacific

 

764

 

433

 

331

 

76

%

EMEA

 

530

 

254

 

276

 

109

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

6,219

 

$

4,367

 

$

1,852

 

42

%

The increase in net sales reflects a 22 percent volume increase driven by sales for the first nine months of 2011 from our acquired National Starch operations, price/product mix improvement of 19 percent reflecting the pass through of higher raw material costs, and favorable currency translation of 1 percent due to stronger foreign currencies.  Organic sales growth in each of our segments was strong, driven mainly by improved product selling prices.  Organic volume was flat.  Co-product sales of approximately $1.12 billion for 2011 increased 43 percent from $781 million in 2010, driven by improved selling prices and increased volume.  Co-product sales from acquired operations for the first nine months of 2011 contributed approximately $66 million, or 8 percent, of the increase.

Net sales in North America increased 38 percent reflecting sales contributed by the acquired National Starch operations and organic growth.  Without sales from the acquired operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net sales on a comparable basis in North America would have increased approximately 18 percent, reflecting price/product mix improvement of 17 percent and a 1 percent increase attributable to currency translation.  Volume in the segment was flat.  Net sales in South America increased 26 percent, driven by a 25 percent price/product mix improvement.  Favorable currency translation of 2 percent more than offset a 1 percent volume decline in the segment.  The volume decline primarily reflects cooler than normal weather conditions in Brazil which reduced demand for beer and soft drink products.  Additionally, our strategy to implement higher pricing contributed to the slight volume decline.  Asia Pacific net sales increased 76 percent, principally driven by sales contributed from acquired operations.  Without the acquired operations, Asia Pacific net sales, on a comparable basis, would have increased approximately 11 percent, reflecting price/product mix improvement of 11 percent and a 4 percent currency translation benefit associated with stronger foreign currencies, which more than offset an organic volume decline of 4 percent.  The impacts of a tsunami and

29



Table of Contents

flooding resulted in reduced demand for our products in the segment.  EMEA net sales more than doubled, largely due to sales contributed from acquired operations.  Without the acquired operations, EMEA net sales, on a comparable basis, would have increased approximately 20 percent, driven by price/product mix improvement.   Organic volume growth of 3 percent was offset by a 3 percent decline attributable to weaker foreign currencies in the segment.

Cost of Sales.  Cost of sales for 2011 increased 40 percent to $5.09 billion from $3.64 billion in 2010.  More than half of this increase reflects costs associated with sales of products from acquired operations for the first nine months of 2011.  The remainder of the increase was driven principally by higher corn costs and, to a lesser extent, currency translation.Currency translation caused cost of sales for 2011 to increase approximately 2 percent from 2010, reflecting the impact of stronger foreign currencies.  Gross corn costs per ton for 2011 increased approximately 36 percent from 2010, driven by higher market prices for corn.  Our gross profit margin for 2011 was 18 percent, compared to 17 percent in 2010,reflecting the impact of the acquired National Starch operations and improved product selling prices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  SG&A expenses for 2011 increased to $543 million from $370 million in 2010.  This increase primarily reflects SG&A expenses of the acquired National Starch operations.  Additionally, higher compensation-related costs and stronger foreign currencies also contributed to the increase in SG&A expenses.  Currency translation caused operating expenses for 2011 to increase approximately 1 percent from 2010, reflecting the impact of stronger foreign currencies.  SG&A expenses for 2011 represented 9 percent of net sales, up from 8 percent in 2010.  Without integration and acquisition costs, SG&A expenses, as a percentage of net sales, would have been 8 percent in both 2011 and 2010.

Other Income-net.  Other income-net of $98 million for 2011 increased from other income-net of $10 million in 2010.  This increase primarily reflects the $58 million NAFTA award received from the Government of the United Mexican States in the first quarter of 2011 and a $30 million gain associated with a fourth quarter 2011 postretirement benefit plan change.

Operating Income.  A summary of operating income is shown below:

(in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Variance

 

Favorable
(Unfavorable)
% Change

 

North America

 

$

322

 

$

249

 

$

73

 

30

%

South America

 

203

 

163

 

40

 

24

%

Asia Pacific

 

79

 

28

 

51

 

181

%

EMEA

 

84

 

37

 

47

 

126

%

Corporate expenses

 

(64

)

(51

)

(13

)

(26

)%

NAFTA award

 

58

 

 

58

 

nm

 

Gain from change in postretirement plan

 

30

 

 

30

 

nm

 

Integration/acquisition costs

 

(31

)

(35

)

4

 

12

%

Restructuring/impairment charges

 

(10

)

(25

)

15

 

59

%

Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory

 

 

(27

)

27

 

nm

 

Operating income

 

$

671

 

$

339

 

$

332

 

98

%

Operating income for 2011 increased to $671 million from $339 million in 2010.  Operating income for 2011 included the $58 million NAFTA award, a $30 million gain from a change in a postretirement plan, $31 million of costs pertaining to the integration of National Starch and a $10 million restructuring charge to reduce the carrying value of certain equipment in connection with our North American manufacturing optimization plan.  Operating income for 2010 included acquisition-related costs of $35 million, impairment/restructuring charges of $25 million and the flow through of $27 million of costs associated with acquired National Starch inventory that was marked up to fair value at the

30



Table of Contents

acquisition date in accordance with business combination accounting rules.  Without the NAFTA award, the gain from the change in the postretirement benefit plan and the integration and restructuring costs in 2011 and the impairment, restructuring, inventory mark-up charge andacquisition-related costs in 2010, operating income for 2011 would have increased 46 percent over the prior year, as earnings grew in each of our segments.This increase was driven by earnings contributed during the first nine months of 2011 from the acquired National Starch operations and, to a lesser extent, organic earnings growth in each of our segments principally driven by improved product pricing.  Currency translation associated with stronger foreign currencies caused operating income to increase by approximately $4 million from 2010.North America operating income increased 30 percent to $322 million from $249 million in 2010.  Approximately one-fourth of this growth was attributable to income for the first nine months of 2011 from acquired operations.  The remaining increase was primarily driven by higher product selling prices.  Currency translation associated with the stronger Canadian dollar caused operating income to increase by approximately $3 million in North America.  South America operating income increased 24 percent to $203 million from $163 million in 2010.  Higher product selling prices drove this earnings growth.  Asia Pacific operating income almost tripled to $79 million from $28 million in 2010, driven by earnings from acquired operations.  Without the earnings from acquired operations, operating income in the segment, on a comparable basis, would have grown approximately 5 percent from a year ago.  This increase primarily reflects higher product selling prices and favorable currency translation.  Stronger foreign currencies (particularly the Korean Won) caused operating income to increase by approximately $1 million in Asia Pacific.  EMEA operating income more than doubled to $84 million, from $37 million in 2010, due in large part to earnings from acquired operations.  Without the earnings from acquired operations, operating income, on a comparable basis, would have grown approximately 29 percent from a year ago, primarily driven by higher product selling prices and organic volume growth.

Financing Costs-net.  Financing costs-net increased to $78 million in 2011 from $64 million in 2010.  The year ago period included a $20 million charge for bridge loan financing fees related to the acquisition of National Starch.  Without this charge in 2010, financing costs for 2011 would have increased approximately 76 percent.  This increase primarily reflects interest expense on our higher average borrowings due to the National Starch acquisition.

Provision for Income Taxes.  Our effective tax rate was 28.7 percent in 2011, as compared to 36.1 percent in 2010.  Our effective income tax rate for 2011 included the benefit of the one-time recognition of tax free income related to the NAFTA award in pre-tax income, which lowered our effective income tax rate by 3.5 percentage points.  Our 2010 effective income tax rate included the impacts of the National Starch acquisition costs, the Chilean charges for impaired assets and other related costs, and an increase in the valuation allowance for Chile.  The 2011 impact of National Starch acquisition costs and changes to the Chilean valuation allowance were not material.  Without the impact of the items described above, our effective tax rates for 2011 and 2010 would have been approximately 32 percent and 33 percent, respectively.  See also Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.information.

 

Net Income Attributable to Non-controlling Interests.  Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was $7 million in 2011, consistent with 2010.2013, up from $6 million in 2012.  The increase reflects the impact of our 2012 sale of GFEMS and improved net income at our non-wholly-owned operation in Pakistan.

 

Comprehensive Income.  We recorded comprehensive income of $193$288 million in 2011,2013, as compared with $287$366 million in 2010.2012.  The decrease in comprehensive income primarily reflects a $125 million unfavorable currencyvariance in the cumulative translation attributable to weaker foreign currenciesadjustment, a $41 million unfavorable variance associated with our cash-flow hedging activity and losses on cash flow hedges, which more than offset our lower net income growth.of $31 million, partially offset by a $119 million favorable variance relating mainly to the improved funded status of our pension and postretirement benefit plans.  The unfavorable variancesvariance in the currencycumulative translation adjustment reflectreflects a greater weakening in end of period foreign currencies relative to the US dollar, in 2011, as compared to a year ago when end of period foreign currencies had strengthened.ago.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

At December 31, 2012,2014, our total assets were $5.59$5.09 billion, updown from $5.32$5.36 billion at December 31, 2011.2013.  This increasedecrease primarily reflects our larger cash and cash equivalents position and increased inventories, partially offset by translation effects associated with weaker end of period foreign currencies relative to the US dollar of approximately $28 million.dollar.  Total equity increaseddecreased to $2.46$2.21 billion at December 31, 20122014, from $2.13$2.43 billion at December 31, 2011,2013.  This decrease primarily reflectingreflects our net income for 2012 and the exercise of stock options, partially offset byshare repurchases, dividends on our common stock and an increase in our accumulated other

31



Table of Contents

comprehensive loss driven principally driven by actuarial losses on our postretirement benefit obligations and unfavorable foreign currency translation.  These declines more than offset the favorable impact of our 2014 net income on total equity.

 

On October 22, 2012, we entered intoWe have a new five-year, senior, unsecured, $1 billion revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”).  The Revolving Credit Agreement replaced our previously existing $1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility.  We paid fees of approximately $3 million relating to the new credit facility, which are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the facility.

that matures on October 22, 2017.  Subject to certain terms and conditions, we may increase the amount of the revolving credit facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement by up to $250 million in the aggregate.  All committed pro rata borrowings under the revolving credit facility will bear interest at a variable annual rate based on the LIBOR or prime rate, at our election, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio (as reported in the financial statements delivered pursuant to the Revolving Credit Agreement).

 

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, events of default, terms and conditions, including limitations on liens, incurrence of debt, mergers and significant asset dispositions.  We must also comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio covenant.  The occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit Agreement could result in all loans and other obligations under the agreement being declared due and payable and the revolving credit facility being terminated.  We met all covenant requirements as of December 31, 2014.

 

At December 31, 2012, there were no2014, we had $87 million of borrowings outstanding under our $1 billion revolving credit facility.Revolving Credit Agreement.  In addition, we have a number of short-term credit facilities consisting of operating lines of credit.  At December 31, 2012,2014, we had total debt outstanding of $1.80$1.83 billion, compared to $1.95$1.81 billion at December 31, 2011.  The2013.  In addition to the borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement, our total debt includes $350 million (principal amount) of 3.2 percent notes due November 1, 2015, $300 million (principal amount) of 1.8 percent senior notes due 2017, $200 million of 6.0 percent senior notes due 2017, $200 million of 5.62 percent senior notes due 2020, $400 million (principal amount) of 4.625 percent notes due 2020, $250 million (principal amount) of 6.625 percent senior notes due 2037 and $76$23 million of consolidated subsidiary debt consisting of local country short-term borrowings.  Ingredion Incorporated, as the parent company, guarantees certain obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries.  At December 31, 2012,2014, such guarantees aggregated $57$214 million.  Management believes that such consolidated subsidiaries will meet their financial obligations as they become due.

34



Table of Contents

 

Historically, the principal source of our liquidity has been our internally generated cash flow, which we supplement as necessary with our ability to borrow on our bank lines and to raise funds in the capital markets.  In addition to borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Agreement, we also have approximately $503$485 million of unused operating lines of credit in the various foreign countries in which we operate.

 

The weighted average interest rate on our total indebtedness was approximately 4.54.1 percent and 4.84.4 percent for 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

 

Net Cash Flows

 

A summary of operating cash flows is shown below:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income

 

$

434

 

$

423

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

211

 

211

 

Write-off of impaired assets

 

24

 

 

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

(5

)

(30

)

Deferred income taxes

 

(3

)

18

 

Changes in working capital

 

33

 

(334

)

Other

 

38

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operations

 

$

732

 

$

300

 

32



Table of Contents

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Net income

 

$

363

 

$

403

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

195

 

194

 

Write-off of impaired assets

 

33

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(11

)

30

 

Changes in working capital

 

84

 

(57

)

Other

 

67

 

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operations

 

$

731

 

$

619

 

 

Cash provided by operations was $732$731 million in 2012,2014, as compared with $300$619 million in 2011.2013.  The increase in operating cash flow for 20122014 primarily reflects improved cash flow associated with working capital management.  The improvement in working capital was driven principally by improved accounts receivable collections and inventory management, and anactivities.  An increase in accounts payable.  Ourpayable and accrued liabilities associated with the timing of payments and a decrease in our margin accounts relating to commodity hedging contracts were relatively unchanged.the primary sources of our 2014 cash inflow from reduced working capital.

We had cash inflows of $39 million in 2014 from our margin account activity relating to commodity hedging contracts.  To manage price risk related to corn purchases in North America, we use derivative instruments (corn futures and options contracts) to lock in our corn costs associated with firm-priced customer sales contracts.  We are unable to directly hedge price risk related to co-product sales; however, we enter into hedges of soybean oil (a competing product to our animal feed and corn oil) in order to mitigate the price risk of animal feed and corn oil sales.  As the market price of corn fluctuates, our derivative instruments change in value and we fund any unrealized losses or receive cash for any unrealized gains related to outstanding corn futures and option contracts.  We plan to continue to use corn futures and option contracts to hedge the price risk associated with firm-priced customer sales contracts in our North American business and, accordingly, we will be required to make cash deposits to or be entitled to receive cash deposits forfrom our margin callsaccounts depending on the movement in the market price for corn.

 

Listed below are our primary investing and financing activities for 2012:2014:

 

 

Sources (Uses)

 

 

Sources (Uses)

 

 

of Cash

 

 

of Cash

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

(in millions)

 

Capital expenditures

 

$

(313

)

 

$

(276

)

Payments on debt

 

(462

)

 

(213

)

Proceeds from borrowings

 

312

 

 

231

 

Dividends paid (including dividends of $3 to non-controlling interests)

 

(69

)

Issuance of common stock

 

34

 

Dividends paid (including to non-controlling interests)

 

(128

)

Repurchases of common stock

 

(18

)

 

(304

)

 

On September 20, 2012, we sold $300 million35



Table of 1.80 percent Senior Notes due September 25, 2017 (the “Notes”).  The Notes rank equally with our other senior unsecured debt.  Interest on the Notes is required to be paid semi-annually on March 25th and September 25th, beginning in March 2013.  We have the option to prepay the Notes at 100 percent of the principal amount plus interest up to the prepayment date and, in certain circumstances, a make-whole amount.  The net proceeds from the sale of the Notes of approximately $297 million were used to repay $205 million of borrowings under our previously existing $1 billion revolving credit facility (see discussion above) and for general corporate purposes.  We paid debt issuance costs of approximately $2 million relating to the Notes, which are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the Notes.Contents

 

On December 14, 2012,12, 2014, our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.26$0.42 per share of common stock.  This dividend was paid on January 25, 201326, 2015 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 31, 2012.2014.

As part of our stock repurchase program, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) on July 30, 2014 with an investment bank under which we repurchased $300 million of our common stock.  We paid the $300 million on August 1, 2014 and received an initial delivery of shares from the investment bank of 3,152,502 shares, representing approximately 80 percent of the shares anticipated to be repurchased based on current market prices at that time.  The initial delivery of shares resulted in an immediate reduction in the number of shares used to calculate the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic and diluted net earnings per share from the effective date of the ASR.  On December 29, 2014, the ASR was completed and we received 671,823 additional shares of our common stock bringing the total amount of repurchases to 3,824,325 shares, based upon the volume-weighted average price of $78.45 per share over the term of the share repurchase agreement.  The ASR was funded through a combination of cash on hand and utilization of the Revolving Credit Agreement.

On October 14, 2014, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Penford Corporation, a Washington corporation (“Penford”), Prospect Sub, Inc., a Washington corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and the Company.  The Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were unanimously approved by our board of directors.  The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Penford, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement (the “Merger”), with Penford continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger.  As a result of the Merger, Penford will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share (a “Share”) of common stock of Penford (“Penford Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than (a) Shares owned by the Company or Merger Sub, or by any subsidiary of the Company or Merger Sub, immediately prior to the Effective Time and (b) Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder who is entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights and properly exercises dissenters’ rights under Washington law with respect to such Shares, will be converted into the right to receive $19.00 in cash per Share, without interest and subject to and reduced by the amount of any tax withholding.  As of the date of the Merger Agreement, Penford had 12,735,038 outstanding Shares and 1,429,000 Shares underlying outstanding options.   Outstanding borrowings under Penford’s revolving credit agreement will become due as a result of the Merger.  The purchase price is estimated to be $340 million, including the assumption of debt.  We expect to fund the acquisition of Penford with available cash and proceeds from borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.  The acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2015 pending regulatory approval.  See Note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

We currently anticipate that capital expenditures for 20132015 will be in the range of $350 million to $400approximate $300 million.

 

We currently expect that our available cash balances, future cash flow from operations and borrowing capacity under our credit facilities will provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our anticipated capital expenditures, dividends, and other investing and/or financing strategiesactivities for the foreseeable future.

 

We have not provided federal and state income taxes on accumulated undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries because these earnings are plannedconsidered to be permanently reinvested.  Approximately $296 million of our cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012 is held by our operations outside of the United States.  We expect that available cash balances and credit facilities in the United States, along with cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our operating and cash needs for the foreseeable future.  It is not practicable to determine the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings.  We do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the United States to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business, including liquidity needs associated with our domestic debt service requirements.requirements or planned acquisition of Penford.  Approximately $604 million of our total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $614 million at December 31, 2014, was held by our operations outside of the United States.  We anticipate that such cash and short-term investments will be used to fund growth opportunities outside of the United States, including capital expenditures and acquisitions.  We expect that available cash balances and credit facilities in the United States, along with cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet our operating and other cash needs for the foreseeable future.

 

3336



Table of Contents

 

Hedging

 

We are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  In the normal course of business, we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions, authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities.  These transactions utilize exchange tradedexchange-traded derivatives or over-the-counter derivatives with investment grade counterparties.  Our hedging transactions may include, but are not limited to, a variety of derivative financial instruments such as commodity futures, options and swap contracts, forward currency contracts and options, interest rate swap agreements and treasury lock agreements.  See Note 5 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

Commodity Price Risk:

 

WeOur principal use derivativesof derivative financial instruments is to manage commodity price risk relatedin North America relating to anticipated purchases of corn and natural gas to be used in the manufacturing process.  We periodically enter into futures, options and swap contracts for a portion of our anticipated corn and natural gas usage, generally over the following twelve to eighteentwenty-four months, in order to hedge price risk associated with fluctuations in market prices.  These derivative instruments are recognized at fair value and have effectively reduced our exposure to changes in market prices for these commodities.  We are unable to directly hedge price risk related to co-product sales; however, we enter into hedges of soybean oil (a competing product to our corn oil) in order to mitigate the price risk of corn oil sales.  Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking our commodities-based derivative instruments to market are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”).  At December 31, 2012,2014, our accumulated other comprehensive loss account (“AOCI”) included $7$13 million of losses, net of tax of $4$6 million, related to these derivative instruments.   It is anticipated that approximately $3 million of these losses net of tax of $2 million, will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.  We expect the losses to be offset by changes in the underlying commodities cost.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk:

 

Due to our global operations, including many emerging markets, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  As a result, we have exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when our foreign operation results are translated to US dollars (USD)USD and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued.  We primarily use derivative financial instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options to selectively hedgemanage our foreign currency transactional exposures.  We generally hedge these exposures up to twelve months forward.exchange risk.  At December 31, 2012,2014, we had $268 million of foreign currency forward sales contracts and $167with an aggregate notional amount of $150 million ofand foreign currency forward purchase contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $70 million that hedged transactional exposures.  The fair value of these derivative instruments was approximately $5is an asset of $1 million at December 31, 2012.2014.

We also have foreign currency derivative instruments that hedge certain foreign currency transactional exposures and are designated as cash-flow hedges.  The amount included in AOCI relating to these hedges at December 31, 2014 was not significant.

We have significant operations in Argentina.  We utilize the official exchange rate published by the Argentine government for re-measurement purposes.  Due to exchange controls put in place by the Argentine government, a parallel market exists for exchanging Argentine pesos to US dollars at rates less favorable than the official rate.  Argentina and other emerging markets experienced increased devaluation and volatility in 2014 and we anticipate that this trend will continue in 2015.

 

Interest Rate Risk:

 

We occasionally use interest rate swaps and Treasury Lock agreements (“T-Locks”) from time to time to hedge our exposure to interest rate changes, to reduce the volatility of our financing costs, or to achieve a desired proportion of fixed versus floating rate debt, based on current and projected market conditions.  At December 31, 2012, weWe did not have any T-Locks outstanding.outstanding at December 31, 2014 or 2013.

 

We37



Table of Contents

In September 2014, we entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rates on our 6.0 percent $200 million senior notes due April 15, 2017, our 1.8 percent $300 million senior notes due September 25, 2017 and on $200 million of our $400 million 4.625 percent senior notes due November 1, 2020, to variable rates.  Additionally, we have interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on our 3.2 percent $350 million senior notes due November 1, 2015 to a variable rate.   These swap agreements call for us to receive interest at athe fixed coupon rate (3.2 percent)of the respective notes and to pay interest at a variable rate based on the six-month US dollar LIBOR rate plus a spread.  We have designated these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligationobligations attributable to changes in interest rates and account for them as fair valuefair-value hedges.  The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements approximated $20was $13 million at both December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2013, and is reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets within non-currentother assets, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation.obligations.

 

At December 31, 2012,2014, our accumulated other comprehensive loss account included $10$7 million of losses (net of tax of $6$4 million) related to settled Treasury Lock agreements.  These deferred losses are being amortized to financing costs

34



Table of Contents

over the terms of the senior notes with which they are associated.  It is anticipated that $2 million of these losses (net of tax of $1 million) will be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.

 

Contractual Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The table below summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012.2014.  Information included in the table is cross-referenced to the notes to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this report, as applicable.

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

More

 

Contractual
Obligations

 

Note
reference

 

Total

 

Less
than 1
year

 

2 – 3
years

 

4 – 5
years

 

More
than 5
years

 

 

Note
reference

 

Total

 

than 1
year

 

2 – 3
years

 

4 – 5
years

 

than 5
years

 

Long-term debt

 

6

 

$

1,700

 

$

 

$

350

 

$

500

 

$

850

 

Long-term debt (a)

 

6

 

$

1,787

 

$

350

 

$

587

 

$

 

$

850

 

Interest on long-term debt

 

6

 

764

 

75

 

150

 

133

 

406

 

 

6

 

607

 

76

 

124

 

93

 

314

 

Operating lease obligations

 

7

 

185

 

41

 

63

 

43

 

38

 

 

7

 

174

 

41

 

64

 

41

 

28

 

Pension and other postretirement obligations

 

9

 

223

 

28

 

5

 

6

 

184

 

 

9

 

113

 

6

 

6

 

6

 

95

 

Purchase obligations (a)

 

 

 

1,182

 

250

 

216

 

180

 

536

 

Purchase obligations (b)

 

 

 

1,404

 

344

 

324

 

242

 

494

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

4,054

 

$

394

 

$

784

 

$

862

 

$

2,014

 

Total (c)

 

 

 

$

4,085

 

$

817

 

$

1,105

 

$

382

 

$

1,781

 

 


(a)Long-term debt at December 31, 2014 includes $350 million of 3.2 percent senior notes that mature November 1, 2015.  These borrowings are included in long-term debt as we have the ability and intent to refinance the notes on a long-term basis prior to the maturity date.

(b)The purchase obligations relate principally to power supply and raw material sourcing agreements, including take or pay energy supply contracts, which help to provide us with an adequate power and raw material supply at certain of our facilities.

(b)(c)The above table does not reflect unrecognized income tax benefits of $37$23 million, the timing of which is uncertain. See Note 8 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information with respect to unrecognized income tax benefits.

 

On January 20, 2006, Ingredion Brasil Ingredientes Industriais Ltda. (“Ingredion Brazil”) entered into a Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Companhia de Gas de Sao Paulo — Comgas (“Comgas”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Comgas supplies natural gas to the cogeneration facility at Ingredion Brazil’s Mogi Guacu plant.  This Agreement will expire on March 31, 2023, unless extended or terminated under certain conditions specified in the Agreement.  During the term of the Agreement, Ingredion Brazil is obligated to purchase from Comgas, and Comgas is obligated to provide to Ingredion Brazil, certain minimum quantities of natural gas that are specified in the Agreement.  The price for such quantities of natural gas is determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Agreement.  The price may vary based upon gas commodity cost and transportation costs, which are adjusted annually; the distribution margin which is set by the Brazilian Commission of Public Energy Services; and the fluctuation of exchange rates between the US dollar and the Brazilian real.  We estimate that the total minimum expenditures by Ingredion Brazil through the remaining term of the Agreement will be approximately $195 million based on current exchange rates as of December 31, 2012 and estimates regarding the application of the formula set forth in the Agreement, spread evenly over the remaining term of the Agreement.  These amounts are included in the purchase obligations disclosed in the table above.  See also Note 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

We currently anticipate that in 20132015 we will make cash contributions of $12$1 million and $14$2 million to our US and non-US pension plans, respectively.  See Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information with respect to our pension and postretirement benefit plans.

 

3538



Table of Contents

 

Key Financial Performance Metrics

 

We use certain key financial metrics to monitor our progress towards achieving our long-term strategic business objectives.  These metrics relate to our return on capital employed, our financial leverage, and our management of working capital, each of which is tracked on an ongoing basis.  We assess whether we are achieving an adequate return on invested capital by measuring our “Return on Capital Employed” (“ROCE”) against our cost of capital.  We monitor our financial leverage by regularly reviewing our ratio of net debt to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA”) and our “Net Debt to Capitalization” percentage to assure that we are properly financed.  We assess our level of working capital investment by evaluating our “Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales.”  We believe these metrics provide valuable managerial information to help us run our business and isare useful to investors.

 

The metrics below include certain information (including Capital Employed, Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted EBITDA, Net Debt, Adjusted Current Assets, Adjusted Current Liabilities and Operating Working Capital) that is not calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).  Management uses non-GAAP financial measures internally for strategic decision making,decision-making, forecasting future results and evaluating current performance.  By disclosing non-GAAP financial measures, management intends to provide a more meaningful, consistent comparison of our operating results and trends for the periods presented.  These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP and reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our operations that, when viewed with our GAAP results, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business.  These non-GAAP measures should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, the corresponding measures calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

 

Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP; therefore, the information is not necessarily comparable to other companies.  A reconciliation of non-GAAP historical financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure is provided in the tables below.

 

3639



Table of Contents

 

Our calculations of these key financial metrics for 20122014 with comparisons to the prior year are as follows:

 

Return on Capital Employed (dollars in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Total equity *

 

$

2,133

 

$

2,001

 

 

$

2,429

 

$

2,459

 

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative translation adjustment *

 

306

 

180

 

 

489

 

335

 

Share-based payments subject to redemption*

 

15

 

9

 

 

24

 

19

 

Total debt *

 

1,949

 

1,769

 

 

1,810

 

1,800

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents *

 

(401

)

(302

)

 

(574

)

(609

)

Capital employed * (a)

 

$

4,002

 

$

3,657

 

 

$

4,178

 

$

4,004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

$

668

 

$

671

 

 

$

581

 

$

613

 

Adjusted for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAFTA award

 

 

(58

)

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

(5

)

(30

)

Gain from sale of land

 

(2

)

 

Integration costs

 

4

 

31

 

Restructuring / impairment charges

 

36

 

10

 

Impairment charge

 

33

 

 

Acquisition costs

 

2

 

 

Adjusted operating income

 

$

701

 

$

624

 

 

$

616

 

$

613

 

Income taxes (at effective tax rates of 30.4% in 2012 and 31.9% in 2011)**

 

(213

)

(199

)

Income taxes (at effective tax rates of 28.3% in 2014 and 26.3% in 2013)**

 

(174

)

(161

)

Adjusted operating income, net of tax (b)

 

$

488

 

$

425

 

 

$

442

 

$

452

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on Capital Employed (b¸a)

 

12.2

%

11.6

%

 

10.6

%

11.3

%

 


* Balance sheet amounts used in computing capital employed represent beginning of period balances.

**The effective income tax rate for 2012 and 2011 exclude2014 excludes the impacts of an impairment charge and restructuring charges, the reversal of the Korea deferred tax asset valuation allowance, integration costs, and the NAFTA award.acquisition costs.   Including these charges,items, the Company’s effective income tax rate for 2012 and 2011 were 27.8 percent and 28.7 percent, respectively.2014 was 30.2 percent. Listed below is a schedule that reconciles our effective income tax ratesrate under US GAAP to the adjusted income tax rates.rate.

 

Income before
Income Taxes (a)

 

Provision for
Income Taxes (b)

 

Effective Income
Tax Rate (b÷a)

 

 

Income before
Income Taxes (a)

 

Provision for
Income Taxes (b)

 

Effective Income
Tax Rate (b÷a)

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

As reported

 

$

601

 

$

593

 

$

167

 

$

170

 

27.8

%

28.7

%

 

$

520

 

$

547

 

$

157

 

$

144

 

30.2

%

26.3

%

Add back (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAFTA award

 

 

(58

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Integration costs

 

4

 

31

 

2

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

Reversal of Korea deferred tax asset valuation allowance

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring/impairment charges

 

36

 

10

 

13

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment charge

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition costs

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted-non-GAAP

 

$

641

 

$

576

 

$

195

 

$

184

 

30.4

%

31.9

%

 

$

555

 

$

547

 

$

157

 

$

144

 

28.3

%

26.3

%

 

3740



Table of Contents

 

Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio (dollars in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Short-term debt

 

$

76

 

$

148

 

 

$

23

 

$

93

 

Long-term debt

 

1,724

 

1,801

 

 

1,804

 

1,717

 

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

 

(609

)

(401

)

 

(580

)

(574

)

Short-term investments

 

(19

)

 

 

(34

)

 

Total net debt (a)

 

$

1,172

 

$

1,548

 

 

$

1,213

 

$

1,236

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

$

428

 

$

416

 

 

$

355

 

$

396

 

Add back (deduct):

 

 

 

 

 

NAFTA award

 

 

(58

)

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

(5

)

(30

)

Gain from land sale

 

(2

)

 

Integration costs

 

4

 

31

 

Restructuring / impairment charges (*)

 

25

 

 

Add back:

 

 

 

 

 

Impairment charge

 

33

 

 

Acquisition costs

 

2

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interest

 

6

 

7

 

 

8

 

7

 

Provision for income taxes

 

167

 

170

 

 

157

 

144

 

Financing costs, net of interest income of $10 and $5, respectively

 

67

 

78

 

Financing costs, net of interest income of $13 and $11, respectively

 

61

 

66

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

211

 

211

 

 

195

 

194

 

Adjusted EBITDA (b)

 

$

901

 

$

825

 

 

$

811

 

$

807

 

Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio (a ÷ b)

 

1.3

 

1.9

 

 

1.5

 

1.5

 

 


*Excludes depreciation related to North American manufacturing optimization plan.

Net Debt to Capitalization percentage (dollars in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Short-term debt

 

$

23

 

$

93

 

Long-term debt

 

1,804

 

1,717

 

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

 

(580

)

(574

)

Short-term investments

 

(34

)

 

Total net debt (a)

 

$

1,213

 

$

1,236

 

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

$

180

 

$

207

 

Share-based payments subject to redemption

 

22

 

24

 

Total equity

 

2,207

 

2,429

 

Total capital

 

$

2,409

 

$

2,660

 

Total net debt and capital (b)

 

$

3,622

 

$

3,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Debt to Capitalization percentage (a¸b)

 

33.5

%

31.7

%

 

3841



Table of Contents

 

Net Debt to Capitalization percentage (dollars in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Short-term debt

 

$

76

 

$

148

 

Long-term debt

 

1,724

 

1,801

 

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

 

(609

)

(401

)

Short-term investments

 

(19

)

 

Total net debt (a)

 

$

1,172

 

$

1,548

 

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

$

160

 

$

199

 

Share-based payments subject to redemption

 

19

 

15

 

Total equity

 

2,459

 

2,133

 

Total capital

 

$

2,638

 

$

2,347

 

Total net debt and capital (b)

 

$

3,810

 

$

3,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Debt to Capitalization percentage (a¸b)

 

30.8

%

39.7

%

Operating Working Capital
as a percentage of Net Sales (dollars in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Current assets

 

$

2,360

 

$

2,102

 

 

$

2,144

 

$

2,214

 

Less: Cash and cash equivalents

 

(609

)

(401

)

 

(580

)

(574

)

Short-term investments

 

(19

)

 

 

(34

)

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

(65

)

(71

)

 

(48

)

(68

)

Adjusted current assets

 

$

1,667

 

$

1,630

 

 

$

1,482

 

$

1,572

 

Current liabilities

 

$

933

 

$

926

 

 

$

721

 

$

820

 

Less: Short-term debt

 

(76

)

(148

)

 

(23

)

(93

)

Deferred income tax liabilities

 

(2

)

 

Adjusted current liabilities

 

$

855

 

$

778

 

 

$

698

 

$

727

 

Operating working capital (a)

 

$

812

 

$

852

 

 

$

784

 

$

845

 

Net sales (b)

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

 

$

5,668

 

$

6,328

 

Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales (a ¸ b)

 

12.4

%

13.7

%

 

13.8

%

13.4

%

 

Commentary on Key Financial Performance Metrics:

 

In accordance with our long-term objectives, we set certain goals relating to these key financial performance metrics that we strive to meet.  At December 31, 2012,2014, we had achieved our established targets.  However, no assurance can be given that we will continue to meet our financial performance metric targets.  See Item 1A “Risk Factors” and Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”  The objectives set out below reflect our current

39



Table of Contents

aspirations in light of our present plans and existing circumstances.  We may change these objectives from time to time in the future to address new opportunities or changing circumstances as appropriate to meet our long-term needs and those of our shareholders.

 

Return on Capital EmployedROCEOur long-term goal is to achieve a Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)ROCE in excess of 8.510.0 percent.  In determining this performance metric, the negative cumulative translation adjustment is added back to total equity to calculate returns based on the Company’s original investment costs.  OurWhile our ROCE for 2012 grew2014 declined to 12.210.6 percent from 11.611.3 percent in 2011, as2013, it still remains above our adjusted operating income growth more than offset a highertarget of 10.0 percent.  The decline in our ROCE for 2014 primarily reflects an increased beginning of the year capital employed base.  Ourbase and a higher effective income tax rate for 2012, excluding the impact of the reversal of the Korea deferred tax asset valuation allowance, restructuring charges and integration costs, was 30.4 percent, down from 31.9 percent in 2011, excluding the impact of the NAFTA award, integration costs and restructuring charges.rate.

 

Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio — Our long-term objective is to maintain a ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA of less than 2.25.  Driven by our strong earnings growth, thisThis ratio declined to 1.3was 1.5 at December 31, 2012, from 1.9 at December 31, 2011.2014, consistent with the prior year.

 

Net Debt to Capitalization percentage — Our long-term goal is to maintain a Net Debt to Capitalization percentage in the range of 32 to 35 percent.  At December 31, 2012,2014, our Net Debt to Capitalization percentage was 30.833.5 percent, downup from 39.731.7 percent a year ago, primarily reflecting a 24 percent reduction in total net debt and a higherlower capital base driven by our earnings growth.share repurchases, dividends on our common stock and an increase in our accumulated other comprehensive loss driven principally by unfavorable foreign currency translation, which more than offset the impact of our 2014 net income.

 

Operating Working Capital as a percentage of Net Sales — Our long-term goal is to maintain operating working capital in a range of 12 to 14 percent of our net sales.  At December 31, 2012,2014, the metric was 12.413.8 percent, downup from the 13.713.4 percent of a year ago.  The decreaseincrease in the metric primarily reflects the impact of our sales growth and improved working capital position.lower net sales.

 

42



Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

 

We have identified below the most critical accounting policies upon which the financial statements are based and that involve our most complex and subjective decisions and assessments.  Our senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these policies with members of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.  These accounting policies are provided in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.  The discussion that follows should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Long-lived Assets

 

We have substantial investments in property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets.  For property, plant and equipment, we recognize the cost of depreciable assets in operations over the estimated useful life of the assets and evaluate the recoverability of these assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  For definite-lived intangible assets, we recognize the cost of these amortizable assets in operations over their estimated useful life and evaluate the recoverability of the assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.

40



Table  The carrying value of Contentsproperty, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2014 was $2.1 billion and $158 million, respectively.

 

In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, we may have to make projections regarding future cash flows.  In developing these projections, we make a variety of important assumptions and estimates that have a significant impact on our assessments of whether the carrying values of property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets should be adjusted to reflect impairment.  Among these are assumptions and estimates about the future growth and profitability of the related business unit or asset group, anticipated future economic, regulatory and political conditions in the business unit’s market, the appropriate discount rates relative to the risk profile of the unit or assets being evaluatedasset group’s market and estimates of terminal or disposal values.

No impairment charges for property, plant and equipment or definite-lived intangible assets were recorded in 2014 or 2013.

 

In 2012, we decided to restructure our business operations in Kenya and close our manufacturing plant in the country.  As part of that decision, we recorded a $20 million restructuring charge, which included fixed asset impairment charges of $6 million to write down the carrying amount of certain assets to their estimated fair values.

 

As part of our ongoing strategic optimization, in the third quarter of 2012 we decided to exit our investment in Shouguang Golden Far East Modified Starch Co., Ltd (“GFEMS”),GFEMS, a non wholly-ownednon-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary in China.  In conjunction with that decision, we recorded a $4 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of GFEMS to its estimated net realizable value.  We also recorded a $1 million charge for impaired assets in Colombia in the third quarter of 2012.

 

In addition, as part of a manufacturing optimization program developed in conjunction with the acquisition of National Starch to improve profitability, we completed a plan in October 2012 that will optimizeoptimized our production capabilities at certain of our North American facilities.  As a result, we recorded restructuring charges to write-off certain equipment by the plan completion date.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, weWe recorded charges of $11 million in 2012, of which $10 million represented accelerated depreciation on the equipment.

43



Table of Contents

 

Through our continual assessment to optimize our operations, we address whether there is a need for additional consolidation of manufacturing facilities or to redeploy assets to areas where we can expect to achieve a higher return on our investment.  This review may result in the closing or selling of certain of our manufacturing facilities.  The closing or selling of any of the facilities could have a significant negative impact on the results of operations in the year that the closing or selling of a facility occurs.

 

Even though it was determined that there was no additional long-lived asset impairment as of December 31, 2012,2014, the future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment, such as a significant adverse change in the business climate that would require a change in our assumptions or strategic decisions made in response to economic or competitive conditions, could require us to perform tests of recoverability in the future.  We continue to closely monitor certain assets in our South America business due to the continued sluggish economy there.

 

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

 

Our methodology for allocating the purchase price of acquisitions is based on established valuation techniques that reflect the consideration of a number of factors, including valuations performed by third-party appraisers when appropriate.  Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value assigned to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  We have identified several reporting units for which cash flows are determinable and to which goodwill may be allocated.  Goodwill is either assigned to a specific reporting unit or allocated between reporting units based on the relative excess fair value of each reporting unit.  In addition, we have certain indefinite-lived intangible assets in the form of trade names and trademarks, the majority of which were acquired through the National Starch acquisition in 2010.trademarks.  The carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 20122014 was $557$478 million and $132 million, respectively.

 

We perform our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests annually as of October 1, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value.

41



Table  In testing goodwill for impairment, we first assesses qualitative factors in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of Contentsa reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. After assessing the qualitative factors, if we determine that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount then we do not perform the two-step impairment test.  If we conclude otherwise, then we perform the first step of the two-step impairment test as described in ASC Topic 350.  In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value.  If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further testing is required.  If the carrying value of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step of the impairment assessment is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill.

 

In performing our annual impairment testtests for goodwill, as of October 1, management mademakes certain estimates and judgments. These estimates and judgments includinginclude the identification of reporting units and the determination of fair values for eachof reporting unit,units, which management estimates using both discounted cash flow analysisanalyses and an analysis of market multiples.  Significant assumptions used in the determination of fair value for each reporting unitunits include estimates for discount and long-term net sales growth rates, in addition to operating and capital expenditure requirements.  We considered significant changes in discount rates for eachthe reporting unitunits based on current market interest rates and specific risk factors within each geographic region.  We also evaluated qualitative factors, such as legal, regulatory, or competitive forces, in estimating the impact to the fair value of eachthe reporting unitunits noting no significant changes that would result in any reporting unit failing the Step One impairment test.  Changes in assumptions concerning projected results or other underlying assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the reporting units in the future.  BasedThe results of our impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2014 indicated that the estimated fair value of our Southern Cone of South America reporting unit was less than its carrying amount primarily due to the impacts on its fair value of the elongation of unfavorable financial trends, such as the impact of higher production costs and our inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover the impacts of inflation and currency devaluation.  Also, the political and economic volatility in the region and continued uncertainty in Argentina negatively impacted our earnings forecasts in the near term.  Therefore, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $33 million to write-off the remaining balance of goodwill for this reporting unit.  Additionally, based on the results of ourthe annual assessment, we concluded that as of October 1, 2012, we concluded2014, it was more likely than not that the fair value of all other reporting units was greater than their carrying value.value (although the $32 million of

44



Table of Contents

goodwill at our Brazil reporting unit continues to be closely monitored due to recent trends experienced in this reporting unit, such as continued economic headwinds and heightened competition).

 

In performing the qualitative annual impairment assessment for other indefinite-lived intangible assets, we considered various factors in determining if it was more likely than not that the fair value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets was greater than their carrying value.  We evaluated net sales attributable to these intangible assets as compared to original projections and evaluated future projections of net sales related to these assets.  In addition, we considered market and industry conditions in the reporting units in which these intangible assets are allocatedreside noting no significant changes that would result in a failed Step One.One impairment test as described in ASC Topic 350.  Based on the results of this qualitative assessment as of October 1, 2012,2014, we concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of these indefinite-lived intangible assets was greater than their carrying value.

 

Income Taxes

 

We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes.  This method recognizesrecognize the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and providesprovide a valuation allowance when deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized.  We have considered forecasted earnings, future taxable income, the mix of earnings in the jurisdictions in which we operate and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance.  In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in the future, we would increase the valuation allowance and make a corresponding charge to earnings in the period in which we make such determination.  Likewise, if we later determine that we are more likely than not to realize the net deferred tax assets, we would reverse the applicable portion of the previously provided valuation allowance.  AtWe had a valuation allowance of $3 million at both December 31, 2012, we maintain valuation allowances of $9 million against approximately $6 million of foreign operating loss carryforwards, $2 million of state loss carryforwards2014 and $1 million of US capital loss carryforward that management has determined will more likely than not expire prior to realization.  During 2012, valuation allowances were reduced from $23 million to $9 million.  The December 31, 2011 valuation allowance on our Korean subsidiary of $15 million was reversed because we consider it more likely than not the net deferred tax assets are realizable.  In addition, we have impaired virtually all the assets of our Kenyan subsidiary and ceased conducting business in the ordinary course.  Because the net deferred tax assets no longer exist, the $3 million valuation allowance reported in December 31, 2011 has also been reversed.  The remaining $4 million of change consists of the capital loss and other immaterial amounts.2013.

 

We are regularly audited by various taxing authorities, and sometimes these audits result in proposed assessments where the ultimate resolution may result in us owing additional taxes.  We establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are appropriate and supportable under local tax law, we believe there is uncertainty with respect to certain positions and we may not succeed in realizing the tax benefit.  We evaluate these unrecognized tax benefits and related reserves each quarter and adjust the reserves and the related interest and penalties in light of changing facts and circumstances regarding the probability of realizing tax benefits, such as the settlement of a tax audit or the expiration of a statute of limitations.  We believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our evaluation of tax benefit realization are reasonable.  However, final determinations of prior-year tax liabilities, either by settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitations, could be materially different than estimates reflected in assets and

42



Table of Contents

liabilities and historical income tax provisions.  The outcome of these final determinations could have a material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period in which that determination is made.  We believe our tax positions comply with applicable tax law and that we have adequately provided for any known tax contingencies.  Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties at December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $23 million and $34 million, respectively.

 

No taxes have been provided on approximately $2.172 billion of undistributed foreign earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested.  If future events, including changes in tax law, material changes in estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements, necessitate that these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for income and withholding taxes may apply, which could materially affect our future effective tax rate.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

We sponsor non-contributory defined benefit plans covering substantially all employees in the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries.  We also provide healthcare and life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States, Canada and Brazil.  In order to measure the expense and obligations associated with these benefits, our management must make a variety of estimates and assumptions including discount rates, expected long-term rates of return, rate of compensation increases, employee turnover rates, retirement rates, mortality rates and other factors.  We review our actuarial assumptions on an annual basis as of December 31 (or more frequently if a significant event requiring remeasurement occurs) and modify our assumptions based on current rates and trends when it

45



Table of Contents

is appropriate to do so.  The effects of modifications are recognized immediately on the balance sheet, but are generally amortized into operating earnings over future periods, with the deferred amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.income.  We believe the assumptions utilized in recording our obligations under our plans, which are reasonable and based on our experience, market conditions, and input from our actuaries.actuaries, are reasonable. We use third-party specialists to assist management in evaluating our assumptions and estimates, as well as to appropriately measure the costs and obligations associated with our retirement benefit plans.  Had we used different estimates and assumptions with respect to these plans, our retirement benefit obligations and related expense could vary from the actual amounts recorded, and such differences could be material.  Additionally, adverse changes in investment returns earned on pension assets and discount rates used to calculate pension and postretirement benefit related liabilities or changes in required funding levels may have an unfavorable impact on future expense and cash flow.  Net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost for all of our plans was $24$16 million in 20122014 and $20$25 million in 2011.2013.

 

We determine our assumption for the discount rate used to measure year-end pension and postretirement obligations based on high quality fixed incomehigh-quality fixed-income investments that match the duration of the expected benefit payments, which has been benchmarked using a long term, high qualitylong-term, high-quality AA corporate bond index.  The weighted average discount rate used to determine our obligations under US pension plans for December 31, 20122014 and 2011 were 3.602013 was 4.00 percent and 4.504.60 percent, respectively.  The weighted average discount rate used to determine our obligations under non-US pension plans for December 31, 20122014 and 2011 were 4.852013 was 4.47 percent and 5.685.60 percent, respectively.  The weighted average discount rate used to determine our obligations under our postretirement plans for December 31, 20122014 and 2011 were 5.442013 was 5.70 percent and 6.236.47 percent, respectively.

 

A one-percentage point decrease in the discount rates at December 31, 20122014 would have increased the accumulated benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation by the following amounts (millions):

 

US Pension Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

38

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

39

 

 

 

 

 

Non-US Pension Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

32

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

42

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

13

 

43



Table of Contents

US Pension Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

36

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

34

 

 

 

 

 

Non-US Pension Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

40

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

32

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

$

6

 

 

The Company’s investment policy for its pension plans is to balance risk and return through diversified portfolios of passively-managed equity index instruments, fixed income index securities, and short-term investments. Maturities for fixed income securities are managed such that sufficient liquidity exists to meet near-term benefit payment obligations.  The asset allocation is reviewed regularly and portfolio investments are rebalanced to the targeted allocation when considered appropriate.  WeFor 2014, we have assumed an expected long-term rate of return on assets, which is based on the fair value of plan assets, of 7.25 percent for US plans and 6.506.45 percent for Canadian plans.  In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption on plan assets, which consist mainly of US and Canadian equity and debt securities, management evaluated historical rates of return achieved on plan assets and the asset allocation of the plans, input from our independent actuaries and investment consultants, and historical trends in long-term inflation rates. Projected return estimates made by such consultants are based upon broad equity and bond indices. We also maintain several funded pension plans in other international locations.  The expected returns on plan assets are determined based on each plan’s investment approach and asset allocations.  A hypothetical 25 basis point decrease in the expected long-term rate of return assumption for 2015 would increase net periodic pension cost for the US and Canada plans by less than $1 million each.

 

Health care46



Table of Contents

Healthcare cost trend rates are used in valuing our postretirement benefit obligations and are established based upon actual health care cost trends and consultation with actuaries and benefit providers.  At December 31, 2012,2014, the health care cost trend rate assumptionassumptions for the next year for the US, Canada and Brazil plans were 7.106.70 percent, 7.357.05 percent and 7.748.66 percent, respectively.

 

The sensitivities of service cost and interest cost and year-end benefit obligations to changes in health carehealthcare cost trend rates (both initial and ultimate rates) for the postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 20122014 are as follows:

 

 

 

20122014

 

One-percentage point increase in trend rates:

 

 

 

·Increase in service cost and interest cost components

 

$

1 million

 

·Increase in year-end benefit obligations

 

$11

4 million

 

 

 

 

 

One-percentage point decrease in trend rates:

 

 

 

·Decrease in service cost and interest cost components

 

($

1 million)million

 

·Decrease in year-end benefit obligations

 

($9 million)

3 million

 

 

See also Note 9 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for more information related to our benefit plans.

 

New Accounting Standards

 

In December 2011,May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11,2014-09, Balance SheetRevenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. 606) This Update requiresthat introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to disclose both gross informationdepict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and net informationuncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about instrumentscontracts with customers, significant judgments and transactions eligiblechanges in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.  This standard is effective for offset infiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period.  The standard will allow various transition approaches upon adoption.  We are assessing the statementimpacts of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement.  Thethis new standard; however the adoption of the guidance in this Update is effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.  We are assessing the requirements of this Update and will comply with the guidance it

44



Table of Contents

contains in the first quarter of 2013.  We do not expect that the adoption of the guidance contained in this Update will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  This Update does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements; however, it requires an entityexpected to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component.  In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income for only amounts reclassified in their entirety in the same reporting period.  This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.  We are assessing the requirements of this Update and will comply with the guidance it contains in the first quarter of 2013.  We do not expect that the adoption of the guidance contained in this Update will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Forward LookingForward-Looking Statements

 

This Form 10-K contains or may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The Company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for such statements.  These

47



Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements include, among other things, any statements regarding the Company’s prospects or future financial condition, earnings, revenues, tax rates, capital expenditures, expenses or other financial items, any statements concerning the Company’s prospects or future operations, including management’s plans or strategies and objectives therefor and any assumptions, expectations or beliefs underlying the foregoing.

These statements can sometimes be identified by the use of forward looking words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “assume”, “believe,” “plan,” “project,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “continue,” “pro forma,” “forecast”“forecast,” “outlook” or other similar expressions or the negative thereof. All statements other than statements of historical facts in this report or referred to in or incorporated by reference into this report are “forward-looking statements.”

These statements are based on current circumstances or expectations, but are subject to certain inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are beyond our control. Although we believe our expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, stockholders are cautioned that no assurance can be given that our expectations will prove correct.

Actual results and developments may differ materially from the expectations expressed in or implied by these statements, based on various factors, including the effects of global economic conditions, including, particularly, continuation or worsening of the current economic, currency and political conditions in South America and economic conditions in Europe, and their impact on our sales volumes and pricing of our products, our ability to collect our receivables from customers and our ability to raise funds at reasonable rates; fluctuations in worldwide markets for corn and other commodities, and the associated risks of hedging against such fluctuations; fluctuations in the markets and prices for our co-products, particularly corn oil; fluctuations in aggregate industry supply and market demand; the behavior of financial markets, including foreign currency fluctuations and fluctuations in interest and exchange rates; continued volatility and turmoil in the capital markets; the commercial and consumer credit environment; general political, economic, business, market and weather conditions in the various geographic regions and countries in which we buy our raw materials or manufacture or sell our products; future financial performance of major industries which we serve, including, without limitation, the food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, paper, corrugated, textile and brewing industries; energy costs and availability, freight and shipping costs, and changes in regulatory controls regarding quotas, tariffs, duties, taxes and income tax rates; operating difficulties; availability of raw materials, including tapioca and the specific varieties of corn upon which our products are based; energy issues in Pakistan; boiler reliability; our ability to effectively integrate and operate acquired businesses; our ability to achieve budgets and to realize expected synergies; our ability to complete planned maintenance and investment projects successfully and on budget; labor disputes; genetic and biotechnology issues; changing consumption preferences including those relating to high fructose corn syrup; increased competitive and/or customer pressure in the starch processing industry; and the outbreak or continuation of serious communicable disease or hostilities including acts of terrorism.  Factors relating to the pending acquisition of Penford Corporation that could cause actual results and developments to differ from expectations include:  required regulatory approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner, if at all; the pending acquisition may not be consummated in a timely manner or at all; the anticipated benefits of the pending acquisition, including synergies, may not be realized; and the integration of Penford’s operations with those of Ingredion may be materially delayed or may be more costly or difficult than expected.

Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or

45



Table of Contents

circumstances after the date of the statement as a result of new information or future events or developments. If we do update or correct one or more of these statements, investors and others should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections.  For a further description of these and other risks, see Item 1A-Risk Factors above and subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q or 8-K.

 

ITEM 7A.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Interest Rate Exposure. We are exposed to interest rate risk on our variable-rate debt and price risk on our fixed-rate date.debt.  As of December 31, 2012,2014, approximately 7636 percent or $1.4 billion$650 million of our borrowings are fixed rate debt and the remaining 2464 percent or approximately $0.4$1.16 billion of our debt is subject to changes in short-term rates, which could affect our interest costs.  We assess market risk based on changes in interest rates utilizing a sensitivity analysis that measures the potential change in earnings, fair values and cash flows based on a hypothetical 1 percentage point change in interest rates at December 31, 2012.2014.  A hypothetical increase of 1 percentage point in the weighted average floating interest rate would

48



Table of Contents

increase our annual interest expense by approximately $4$12 million.  See also Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements entitled “Financing Arrangements” for further information.

 

At December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, the carrying and fair values of long-term debt were as follows:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
value

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
value

 

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
 value

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
 value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020

 

$

399

 

$

448

 

$

399

 

$

422

 

 

$

399

 

$

427

 

$

399

 

$

420

 

3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015

 

350

 

368

 

350

 

360

 

 

350

 

356

 

350

 

363

 

1.8% senior notes, due September 25, 2017

 

298

 

300

 

 

 

 

299

 

302

 

298

 

296

 

6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037

 

257

 

315

 

257

 

297

 

 

256

 

312

 

257

 

281

 

6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017

 

200

 

227

 

200

 

222

 

 

200

 

220

 

200

 

219

 

5.62% senior notes, due March 25, 2020

 

200

 

236

 

200

 

225

 

 

200

 

222

 

200

 

221

 

US revolving credit facility, due October 22, 2017

 

 

 

376

 

376

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt

 

20

 

20

 

19

 

19

 

U.S. revolving credit facility due October 22, 2017

 

87

 

87

 

 

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument

 

13

 

13

 

13

 

13

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

1,724

 

$

1,914

 

$

1,801

 

$

1,921

 

 

$

1,804

 

$

1,939

 

$

1,717

 

$

1,813

 

 

A hypothetical change of 1 percentage point in interest rates would change the fair value of our fixed rate debt at December 31, 20122014 by approximately $119$87 million.  Since we have no current plans to repurchase our outstanding fixed-rate instruments before their maturities, the impact of market interest rate fluctuations on our long-term debt is not expected to have an affecta significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In anticipation of our 2010 issuance of the $350 million 3.2 percent senior notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”) and the $400 million 4.625 percent senior notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), we entered into T-Lock agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes (the “T-Locks”).  The T-Locks were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered into and the time the debt was priced.  The T-Locks are accounted for as cash flow hedges.  The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and we paid approximately $15 million, representing the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements.  The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes.

On March 25, 2011,2014, we entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rates on our 6.0 percent $200 million senior notes due April 15, 2017, our 1.8 percent $300 million senior notes due September 25, 2017 and on $200 million of our $400 million 4.625 percent senior notes due November 1, 2020, to variable rates.  Additionally, we have interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on our 3.2 percent $350 million senior notes due November 1, 2015 Notes to a variable rate.   These swap agreements call for us to receive interest at athe fixed coupon rate (3.2 percent)of the respective notes and to pay interest at a variable rate based on the six-month US dollar LIBOR rate plus a spread.  We have designated these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligationobligations attributable to changes in interest rates and account for them as fair valuefair-value hedges.  The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements approximated $20$13 million at December 31, 20122014 and is reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets within non-currentother assets, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation.obligations.

 

Raw Material and Energy Costs.  Our finished products are made primarily from corn.  In North America, we sell a large portion of finished products at firm prices established in supply contracts typically lasting for periods of up to one year.  In order to minimize the effect of volatility in the cost of corn related to these firm-priced supply contracts, we enter into corn futures contracts or take other hedging positions in the corn futures market.  These contracts typically

46



Table of Contents

mature within one year.  At expiration, we settle the derivative contracts at a net amount equal to the difference between the then-current price of corn and the futures contract price.  While these hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, changes in the value of the underlying exposures we are hedging generally offset such fluctuations.  While the corn futures contracts or other hedging positions are intended to minimize the volatility of corn costs on operating profits,

49



Table of Contents

occasionally the hedging activity can result in losses, some of which may be material.  Outside of North America, sales of finished products under long-term, firm-priced supply contracts are not material.

 

Energy costs represent approximately 1011 percent of our operating costs.  The primary use of energy is to create steam in the production process and to dry product.  We consume coal, natural gas, electricity, wood and fuel oil to generate energy.  The market prices for these commodities vary depending on supply and demand, world economies and other factors.  We purchase these commodities based on our anticipated usage and the future outlook for these costs.  We cannot assure that we will be able to purchase these commodities at prices that we can adequately pass on to customers to sustain or increase profitability.  We use derivative financial instruments, such as over-the-counter natural gas swaps, to hedge portions of our natural gas costs generally over the following twelve to twenty-four months, primarily in our North American operations.

 

Our commodity price hedging instruments generally relate to contracted firm-priced business.  At December 31, 2012,2014, we had outstanding futures and option contracts that hedged approximately 9793 million bushels of forecasted corn purchases.purchases and 4 million pounds of soybean oil.  We are unable to directly hedge price risk related to co-product sales; however, we occasionally enter into hedges of soybean oil (a competing product to corn oil) in order to mitigate the price risk of corn oil sales.  Also at December 31, 2012,2014, we had outstanding swap and option contracts that hedged approximately 1814 million mmbtu’s of forecasted natural gas purchases.  Based on our overall commodity hedge position at December 31, 2012,2014, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would result in a charge to other comprehensive income of approximately $44$28 million, net of income tax benefit.  It should be noted that any change in the fair value of the contracts, real or hypothetical, would be substantially offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged item.

 

Foreign Currencies.  Due to our global operations, we are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  As a result, we have exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when our foreign operation results are translated to USD and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued.  We have significant operations in Argentina.  We utilize the official exchange rate published by the Argentine government for re-measurement purposes.  Due to exchange controls put in place by the Argentine government, a parallel market exists for exchanging Argentine pesos to US dollars at rates less favorable than the official rate.  Argentina and other emerging markets experienced increased devaluation and volatility in 2014 and we anticipate that this trend will continue in 2015.

We selectively use derivative instruments such as forward contracts, currency swaps and options to manage transactional foreign exchange risk.  Based on our overall foreign currency transactional exposure at December 31, 2012,2014, we estimate that a hypothetical 10 percent decline in the value of the USD would have resulted in a transactional foreign exchange gain of approximatelyless than $1 million.  At December 31, 2012,2014, our accumulated other comprehensive loss account included in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheet includes a cumulative translation loss of $335$701 million.  The aggregate net assets of our foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency approximated $1.5$1.6 billion at December 31, 2012.2014.  A hypothetical 10 percent decline in the value of the US dollarUSD relative to foreign currencies would have resulted in a reduction to our cumulative translation loss and a credit to other comprehensive income of approximately $170$181 million.

 

4750



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

Ingredion Incorporated


Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4952

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

5154

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

5255

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

5356

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Equity and Redeemable Equity

5457

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

5558

 

 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

5659

 

 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

9193

 

4851



Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Ingredion Incorporated:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ingredion Incorporated and subsidiaries (formerly known as Corn Products International, Inc.) (the Company) as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and redeemable equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012.2014. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ingredion Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012,2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria

 

4952



Table of Contents

 

all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 27, 2013

Chicago, Illinois

February 20, 2015

 

5053



Table of Contents

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net sales before shipping and handling costs

 

$

6,868

 

$

6,544

 

$

4,632

 

 

$

5,998

 

$

6,653

 

$

6,868

 

Less — shipping and handling costs

 

336

 

325

 

265

 

Less - shipping and handling costs

 

330

 

325

 

336

 

Net sales

 

6,532

 

6,219

 

4,367

 

 

5,668

 

6,328

 

6,532

 

Cost of sales

 

5,294

 

5,093

 

3,643

 

 

4,553

 

5,197

 

5,294

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

1,238

 

1,126

 

724

 

 

1,115

 

1,131

 

1,238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

556

 

543

 

370

 

 

525

 

534

 

556

 

Other (income)-net

 

(22

)

(98

)

(10

)

Restructuring/impairment charges

 

36

 

10

 

25

 

Other (income) - net

 

(24

)

(16

)

(22

)

Impairment/restructuring charges

 

33

 

 

36

 

 

570

 

455

 

385

 

 

534

 

518

 

570

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

668

 

671

 

339

 

 

581

 

613

 

668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs-net

 

67

 

78

 

64

 

 

61

 

66

 

67

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

601

 

593

 

275

 

 

520

 

547

 

601

 

Provision for income taxes

 

167

 

170

 

99

 

 

157

 

144

 

167

 

Net income

 

434

 

423

 

176

 

 

363

 

403

 

434

 

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

6

 

7

 

7

 

Less - Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

8

 

7

 

6

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

$

428

 

$

416

 

$

169

 

 

$

355

 

$

396

 

$

428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

76.5

 

76.4

 

75.6

 

 

73.6

 

77.0

 

76.5

 

Diluted

 

78.2

 

78.2

 

76.8

 

 

74.9

 

78.3

 

78.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share of Ingredion:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

5.59

 

$

5.44

 

$

2.24

 

 

$

4.82

 

$

5.14

 

$

5.59

 

Diluted

 

5.47

 

5.32

 

2.20

 

 

4.74

 

5.05

 

5.47

 

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

5154



Table of Contents

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 

Years ended December 31,
(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Net income

 

$

434

 

$

423

 

$

176

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $25, $19 and $12, respectively

 

43

 

29

 

20

 

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on cash flow hedges included in net income, net of income tax effect of $15, $61 and $34, respectively

 

(25

)

(105

)

54

 

Actuarial loss on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $27, $4 and $4, respectively

 

(56

)

(10

)

(7

)

Losses (gains) related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $2, $5 and $2, respectively

 

5

 

(11

)

3

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(29

)

(126

)

48

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

372

 

$

200

 

$

294

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

6

 

7

 

7

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Ingredion

 

$

366

 

$

193

 

$

287

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

52



Table of Contents

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31,
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

609

 

$

401

 

Short-term investments

 

19

 

 

Accounts receivable — net

 

814

 

837

 

Inventories

 

834

 

769

 

Prepaid expenses

 

19

 

24

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

65

 

71

 

Total current assets

 

2,360

 

2,102

 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

175

 

172

 

Buildings

 

698

 

656

 

Machinery and equipment

 

4,035

 

3,882

 

 

 

4,908

 

4,710

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

(2,715

)

(2,554

)

 

 

2,193

 

2,156

 

Goodwill

 

557

 

562

 

Other intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $35 and $20, respectively)

 

329

 

347

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

21

 

19

 

Investments

 

10

 

10

 

Other assets

 

122

 

121

 

Total assets

 

$

5,592

 

$

5,317

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt

 

$

76

 

$

148

 

Deferred income taxes

 

2

 

 

Accounts payable

 

590

 

529

 

Accrued liabilities

 

265

 

249

 

Total current liabilities

 

933

 

926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

 

297

 

243

 

Long-term debt

 

1,724

 

1,801

 

Deferred income taxes

 

160

 

199

 

Share-based payments subject to redemption

 

19

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ingredion stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock — authorized 25,000,000 shares-$0.01 par value, none issued

 

 

 

Common stock — authorized 200,000,000 shares-$0.01 par value, 77,141,691 and 76,821,553 issued at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively

 

1

 

1

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,148

 

1,146

 

Less: Treasury stock (common stock; 109,768 and 938,666 shares at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively) at cost

 

(6

)

(42

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(475

)

(413

)

Retained earnings

 

1,769

 

1,412

 

Total Ingredion stockholders’ equity

 

2,437

 

2,104

 

Non-controlling interests

 

22

 

29

 

Total equity

 

2,459

 

2,133

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,592

 

$

5,317

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

53



Table of Contents

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Equity and Redeemable Equity

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Common
Stock

 

Additional
Paid-In Capital

 

Treasury
Stock

 

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Non-Controlling
Interests

 

Redeemable
Common Stock

 

Share-based
Payments Subject
to Redemption

 

Balance, December 31, 2009

 

$

1

 

$

1, 082

 

$

(13

)

$

(308

)

$

919

 

$

23

 

$

14

 

$

8

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(42

)

(3

)

 

 

 

 

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

5

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expiration of put option

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax of $4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

 

$

1

 

$

1, 119

 

$

(1

)

$

(190

)

$

1,046

 

$

26

 

$

 

$

9

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

416

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(50

)

(4

)

 

 

 

 

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $61

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(105

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(48

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

11

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(126

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax of $4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

1

 

$

1,146

 

$

(42

)

$

(413

)

$

1,412

 

$

29

 

$

 

$

15

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

(4

)

 

 

 

 

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

(13

)

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

(3

)

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

 

 

Actuarial loss on postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax of $27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses related to postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

1

 

$

1, 148

 

$

(6

)

$

(475

)

$

1,769

 

$

22

 

$

 

$

19

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements

54



Table of Contents

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31,
(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

434

 

$

423

 

$

176

 

Non-cash charges (credits) to net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

211

 

211

 

155

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(3

)

18

 

(30

)

Write-off of impaired assets

 

24

 

 

19

 

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

(5

)

(30

)

 

Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory

 

 

 

27

 

Bridge loan financing cost charge

 

 

 

20

 

Changes in working capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses

 

22

 

(134

)

(45

)

Inventories

 

(69

)

(149

)

(51

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

80

 

27

 

123

 

Decrease (increase) in margin accounts

 

 

(78

)

18

 

Other

 

38

 

12

 

(18

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

732

 

300

 

394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash used for investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(313

)

(263

)

(159

)

Short-term investment

 

(18

)

 

 

Proceeds from disposal of plants and properties

 

9

 

3

 

3

 

Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired of $82 in 2010

 

 

(15

)

(1,272

)

Other

 

 

2

 

 

Cash used for investing activities

 

(322

)

(273

)

(1,428

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on debt

 

(462

)

(22

)

(77

)

Proceeds from borrowings

 

312

 

182

 

1,289

 

Bridge loan financing costs

 

 

 

(20

)

Debt issuance costs

 

(5

)

 

(15

)

Dividends paid (including to non-controlling interests)

 

(69

)

(50

)

(45

)

Repurchases of common stock

 

(18

)

(48

)

(5

)

Issuance of common stock

 

34

 

18

 

22

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

11

 

6

 

6

 

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

 

(197

)

86

 

1,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash

 

(5

)

(14

)

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

208

 

99

 

127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

401

 

302

 

175

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

609

 

$

401

 

$

302

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income

 

$

363

 

$

403

 

$

434

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses) on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12, $29 and $25, respectively

 

(29

)

(64

)

43

 

Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) on cash-flow hedges included in net income, net of income tax effect of $23, $19 and $15, respectively

 

50

 

41

 

(25

)

Actuarial gains (losses) on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $5, $32 and $27, respectively

 

(12

)

63

 

(56

)

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $1, $3 and $2, respectively

 

4

 

5

 

5

 

Unrealized gain on investment, net of income tax effect

 

 

1

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(212

)

(154

)

(29

)

Comprehensive income

 

$

164

 

$

295

 

$

372

 

Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

8

 

7

 

6

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Ingredion

 

$

156

 

$

288

 

$

366

 

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

55



Table of Contents

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

(in millions, except share and per share amounts)

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

580

 

$

574

 

Short-term investments

 

34

 

 

Accounts receivable — net

 

762

 

832

 

Inventories

 

699

 

723

 

Prepaid expenses

 

21

 

17

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

48

 

68

 

Total current assets

 

2,144

 

2,214

 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

170

 

173

 

Buildings

 

695

 

696

 

Machinery and equipment

 

4,021

 

4,063

 

 

 

4,886

 

4,932

 

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

(2,813

)

(2,776

)

 

 

2,073

 

2,156

 

Goodwill

 

478

 

535

 

Other intangible assets (less accumulated amortization of $62 and $49, respectively)

 

290

 

311

 

Deferred income tax assets

 

4

 

15

 

Investments

 

5

 

11

 

Other assets

 

97

 

118

 

Total assets

 

$

5,091

 

$

5,360

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term borrowings

 

$

23

 

$

93

 

Accounts payable

 

430

 

458

 

Accrued liabilities

 

268

 

269

 

Total current liabilities

 

721

 

820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

 

157

 

163

 

Long-term debt

 

1,804

 

1,717

 

Deferred income taxes

 

180

 

207

 

Share-based payments subject to redemption

 

22

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ingredion stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock — authorized 25,000,000 shares-$0.01 par value, none issued

 

 

 

Common stock — authorized 200,000,000 shares-$0.01 par value, 77,810,875 and 77,672,670 issued at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

 

1

 

1

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,164

 

1,166

 

Less - Treasury stock (common stock: 6,488,605 and 3,361,180 shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively) at cost

 

(481

)

(225

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(782

)

(583

)

Retained earnings

 

2,275

 

2,045

 

Total Ingredion stockholders’ equity

 

2,177

 

2,404

 

Non-controlling interests

 

30

 

25

 

Total equity

 

2,207

 

2,429

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,091

 

$

5,360

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

56



Table of Contents

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Equity and Redeemable Equity

 

 

Equity

 

 

 

(in millions)

 

Common
Stock

 

Additional
Paid-In Capital

 

Treasury
Stock

 

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)

 

Retained
Earnings

 

Non-Controlling
Interests

 

Share-based
Payments Subject
to Redemption

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

1

 

$

1,146

 

$

(42

)

$

(413

)

$

1,412

 

$

29

 

$

15

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

428

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(71

)

(4

)

 

 

Gains on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of gains on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(25

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

(13

)

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

(3

)

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

Actuarial losses on pension and postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses on pension and postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

1

 

$

1, 148

 

$

(6

)

$

(475

)

$

1,769

 

$

22

 

$

19

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

396

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(120

)

(4

)

 

 

Losses on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(64

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of losses on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 

(228

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

8

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

(1

)

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(154

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial gains on pension and postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses on pension and postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on investment, net of income tax effect

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

1

 

$

1, 166

 

$

(225

)

$

(583

)

$

2,045

 

$

25

 

$

24

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

355

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

Dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(125

)

(3

)

 

 

Losses on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of losses on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

(3

)

(301

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock on exercise of stock options

 

 

 

(17

)

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expense

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other share-based compensation

 

 

 

5

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(212

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial losses on pension and postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses on pension and postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

1

 

$

1, 164

 

$

(481

)

$

(782

)

$

2,275

 

$

30

 

$

22

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements

57



Table of Contents

INGREDION INCORPORATED

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years ended December 31,
(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

363

 

$

403

 

$

434

 

Non-cash charges (credits) to net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

195

 

194

 

211

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(11

)

30

 

(3

)

Write-off of impaired assets

 

33

 

 

24

 

Other

 

68

 

74

 

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in working capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses

 

(15

)

(69

)

22

 

Inventories

 

(6

)

76

 

(69

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

66

 

(78

)

80

 

Decrease in margin accounts

 

39

 

14

 

 

Other

 

(1

)

(25

)

(22

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

731

 

619

 

732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash used for investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(276

)

(298

)

(313

)

Short-term investments

 

(34

)

19

 

(18

)

Proceeds from disposal of plants and properties

 

5

 

3

 

9

 

Proceeds from sale of investment

 

11

 

 

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

Cash used for investing activities

 

(294

)

(274

)

(322

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash used for financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on debt

 

(213

)

(53

)

(462

)

Proceeds from borrowings

 

231

 

21

 

312

 

Debt issuance costs

 

 

 

(5

)

Dividends paid (including to non-controlling interests)

 

(128

)

(112

)

(69

)

Repurchases of common stock

 

(304

)

(228

)

(18

)

Issuance of common stock

 

20

 

14

 

34

 

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

 

6

 

5

 

11

 

Cash used for financing activities

 

(388

)

(353

)

(197

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effects of foreign exchange rate changes on cash

 

(43

)

(27

)

(5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

6

 

(35

)

208

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

574

 

609

 

401

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

580

 

$

574

 

$

609

 

See notes to the consolidated financial statements.

58



Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1- Description of the Business

 

Ingredion Incorporated (formerly Corn Products International, Inc.) (“the Company”) was founded in 1906 and became an independent and public company as of December 31, 1997.  The Company manufactures and sells starches and sweeteners derived from the wet milling and processing of corn and other starch-based materials to a wide range of industries, both domestically and internationally.

 

NOTE 2- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of presentation — The consolidated financial statements consist of the accounts of the Company, including all significant subsidiaries.  Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

 

The preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.  These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses.  Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, legal contingencies, guarantee obligations, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, and pension and other postretirement benefits, among others.  These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment.  Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances.  Management will adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate.  Foreign currency devaluations, corn price volatility, access to difficult credit markets and adverse changes in the global economic environment have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions.  As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.  Changes in these estimates will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.

 

A new line item entitled “other” was established within the non-cash charges (credits) to net income portion of the operating section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported total cash provided by operating activities.

Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, other than those whose functional currency is the US dollar, are translated at current exchange rates with the related translation adjustments reported in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).  The US dollar is the functional currency for the Company’s Mexico subsidiary.  Income statement accounts are translated at the average exchange rate during the period.  For foreign subsidiaries where the US dollar is the functional currency, monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates with the related adjustment included in net income. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates.  TheAlthough the Company hedges the predominance of its transactional foreign exchange risk (see Note 5), the Company incurs foreign currency transaction gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency.  For 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, the Company incurred foreign currency transaction losses of $1 million, $3 million and less than $1 million, $2 million and $2 million, respectively.  The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss included in equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes cumulative translation loss adjustments of $335$701 million and $306$489 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

 

Cash and cash equivalents — Cash equivalents consist of all instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less, and which have virtually no risk of loss in value.

 

Inventories — Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)weighted average method.

 

Investments — Investments in the common stock of affiliated companies over which the Company does not exercise significant influence are accounted for under the cost method.  The Company’s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary hasIn 2014, the Company sold an investment that isit had accounted for under the cost method.  The Company received $11 million in cash and recorded a pre-tax

59



Table of Contents

gain of $5 million from the sale.  The Company no longer has any investments accounted for under the cost method at December 31, 2014.  The carrying value of thisthe investment was $6 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011.2013.  Investments that enable the Company to exercise significant influence, but do not represent a controlling interest, are accounted for under the equity method; such investments are carried at cost, adjusted to reflect the Company’s proportionate share of income or loss, less dividends received.  The Company did not have any investments accounted for under the equity method at December 31, 20122014 or 2011.2013.  The Company also has equity interests in the CME Group Inc., which it classifies as available for sale securities.  The investment is carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded to other

56



Table of Contents

comprehensive income.  The Company would recognize a loss on its investments when there is a loss in value of an investment that is other than temporary.  In 2011, the Company sold its investment in Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation which had been accounted for as an available for sale security and recorded a nominal gain.

 

Property, plant and equipment and depreciation — Property, plant and equipment (“PP&E”) are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is generally computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets, which range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and from 3 to 2520 years for all other assets.  Where permitted by law, accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax purposes.  The Company reviews the recoverability of the net book value of property, plant and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition.  If this review indicates that the carrying values will not be recovered, the carrying values would be reduced to fair value and an impairment loss would be recognized.  As required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the impairment analysis for long-lived assets occurs before the goodwill impairment assessment described below.

 

Goodwill and other intangible assets — Goodwill ($557478 million and $562$535 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively) represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value assigned to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  The Company also has other intangible assets aggregating $329$290 million and $347$311 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.  The carrying amount of goodwill by geographic segment at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 was as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

North
America

 

South
America

 

Asia
Pacific

 

EMEA

 

Total

 

 

North 
America

 

South
America

 

Asia 
Pacific

 

EMEA

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

$

278

 

$

107

 

$

106

 

$

81

 

$

572

 

Translation

 

 

(6

)

 

(4

)

(10

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

278

 

$

101

 

$

106

 

$

77

 

$

562

 

 

$

278

 

$

101

 

$

106

 

$

77

 

$

562

 

Impairment charges

 

 

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

 

 

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

Translation

 

 

(6

)

 

3

 

(3

)

Currency translation

 

 

(6

)

 

3

 

(3

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

278

 

$

95

 

$

104

 

$

80

 

$

557

 

 

$

278

 

$

95

 

$

104

 

$

80

 

$

557

 

Currency translation

 

 

(17

)

(7

)

2

 

(22

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

278

 

$

78

 

$

97

 

$

82

 

$

535

 

Impairment charges

 

 

(33

)

 

 

(33

)

Currency translation

 

 

(13

)

(4

)

(7

)

(24

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

278

 

$

32

 

$

93

 

$

75

 

$

478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill before impairment charges

 

$

279

 

$

101

 

$

225

 

$

77

 

$

682

 

 

$

279

 

$

78

 

$

218

 

$

82

 

$

657

 

Accumulated impairment charges

 

(1

)

 

(119

)

 

(120

)

 

(1

)

 

(121

)

 

(122

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

278

 

$

101

 

$

106

 

$

77

 

$

562

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

278

 

$

78

 

$

97

 

$

82

 

$

535

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill before impairment charges

 

$

279

 

$

95

 

$

225

 

$

80

 

$

679

 

 

$

279

 

$

65

 

$

214

 

$

75

 

$

633

 

Accumulated impairment charges

 

(1

)

 

(121

)

 

(122

)

 

(1

)

(33

)

(121

)

 

(155

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

278

 

$

95

 

$

104

 

$

80

 

$

557

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

278

 

$

32

 

$

93

 

$

75

 

$

478

 

60



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s other intangible assets for the periods presented:

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

(in millions)

 

Gross

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

Weighted
Average
Useful
Life
(years)

 

Gross

 

Accumulated
Amortization

 

Net

 

Weighted
Average
Useful
Life
(years)

 

Trademarks/tradenames

 

$

132

 

 

$

132

 

 

$

137

 

 

$

137

 

 

Customer relationships

 

143

 

(13

)

130

 

25

 

141

 

(10

)

131

 

25

 

Technology

 

83

 

(19

)

64

 

10

 

83

 

(7

)

76

 

10

 

Other

 

6

 

(3

)

3

 

8

 

6

 

(3

)

3

 

8

 

Total other intangible assets

 

$

364

 

(35

)

$

329

 

19

 

$

367

 

(20

)

$

347

 

19

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s amortization expense related to intangible assets for the periods presented:

57



Table of Contents

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

Gross

 

Accumulated 
Amortization

 

Net

 

Weighted 
Average 
Useful 
Life 
(years)

 

Gross

 

Accumulated 
Amortization

 

Net

 

Weighted 
Average 
Useful 
Life 
(years)

 

Amortization expense

 

$

14

 

$

14

 

$

4

 

Trademarks/tradenames

 

$

132

 

$

 

$

132

 

 

$

132

 

$

 

$

132

 

 

Customer relationships

 

132

 

(23

)

109

 

25

 

139

 

(18

)

121

 

25

 

Technology

 

83

 

(35

)

48

 

10

 

83

 

(27

)

56

 

10

 

Other

 

5

 

(4

)

1

 

8

 

6

 

(4

)

2

 

8

 

Total other intangible assets

 

$

352

 

$

(62

)

$

290

 

19

 

$

360

 

$

(49

)

$

311

 

19

 

 

For definite-lived intangible assets, the Company recognizes the cost of such amortizable assets in operations over their estimated useful lives and evaluates the recoverability of the assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $14 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

Based on acquisitions completed through December 31, 2012,2014, the Company expects intangible asset amortization expense for subsequentfuture years to be approximately $14 million annually through 2017.2019.

 

The Company assesses goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise).  The Company has chosen to perform this annual impairment assessment as of October 1 of each year.  The Company has completed the required impairment assessments and determined therethat it was necessary to be norecord an impairment charge to write-off the goodwill at its Southern Cone of South America reporting unit in the fourth quarter of 2012.2014 (see below).

 

In testing goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. After assessing the qualitative factors, if the Company determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount then the Company does not perform the two-step impairment test.  If the Company concludes otherwise, then it performs the first step of the two-step impairment test as described in FASB ASC Topic 350.  In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carrying value.  If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further testing is required.  If the carrying value of the net assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, a second step of the impairment assessment is performed in order to determine the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill.  Determining the implied fair value of goodwill requires a valuation of the reporting unit’s tangible and intangible assets and liabilities in a manner similar to the allocation of purchase price in a business combination.  If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, goodwill is deemed impaired and is written down to the extent of the difference.  BasedThe results of the Company’s impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2014 indicated that the estimated fair value of the Company’s Southern Cone of South America reporting unit was less than its carrying amount primarily due to the impacts on its fair value of the elongation of unfavorable financial trends, such as the impact of higher production costs and the Company’s inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover the impacts of inflation and currency devaluation.  Also, the political and economic volatility in the region and continued uncertainty in Argentina negatively impacted earnings forecasts for the reporting unit in the near term.  Therefore, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $33 million to write-off the remaining balance of goodwill for this reporting unit.  Additionally, based on the results of the qualitativeannual assessment, the Company concluded that as of October 1, 2012,2014, it was more likely than not that the fair value of theseall other reporting units was greater than their carrying value.value (although the $32 million of goodwill at the Brazil reporting unit continues to be closely monitored due to recent trends experienced in this reporting unit).

 

The Company early adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment for the October 1, 2012 impairment test.  The objective of the update was to simplify how entities testIn testing indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment, and improve the consistency of impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories.  This update provides the option to assessCompany first assesses qualitative factors in determiningto determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired.  After assessing the qualitative factors, if an entitythe Company determines that it is not more likely than not that

61



Table of Contents

the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, then it would not be required to compute the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset.  In the event the qualitative assessment leads an entitythe Company to conclude otherwise, then the entityit would be required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with ASC subtopic 350-30.  In performing thisthe qualitative analysis, the Company consideredconsiders various factors including net sales derived from these intangibles and certain market and industry conditions.  Based on the results of this qualitative assessment, the Company concluded that as of October 1, 2012,2014, it was more likely than not that the fair value of thesethe indefinite-lived intangible assets was greater than their carrying value.

 

Revenue recognition — The Company recognizes operating revenues at the time title to the goods and all risks of ownership transfer to the customer.  This transfer is considered complete when a sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.  In the case of consigned inventories, the title passes and the transfer of ownership risk occurs when the goods are used by the customer.  Taxes assessed by governmental authorities and collected from customers are accounted for on a net basis and excluded from revenues.

 

58



Table of Contents

Hedging instruments — The Company uses derivative financial instruments principally to offset exposure to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  Derivative financial instruments used by the Company consist of commodity futures and option contracts, forward currency contracts and options, interest rate swap agreements and treasury lock agreements.  The Company enters into futures and option contracts, which are designated as hedges of specific volumes of commodities (corn(primarily corn and natural gas) that will be purchased in a future month.  These derivative financial instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value.  The Company has also entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on certain fixed rate debt to a variable interest rate and, on certain variable rate debt, to a fixed interest rate.  The Company periodically enters into treasury lock agreements to lock the benchmark rate for an anticipated fixed ratefixed-rate borrowing.  See also Note 5 and Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as either a hedge of variable cash flows to be paid related to interest on variable rate debt, as a hedge of market variation in the benchmark rate for a future fixed rate debt issue, as a hedge of foreign currency cash flows associated with certain forecasted commercial transactions or loans, as a hedge of certain forecasted purchases of corn or natural gas used in the manufacturing process (“a cash-flow hedge”), or as a hedge of the fair value of certain debt obligations (“a fair-value hedge”).  This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as fair-value or cash-flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions.  For all hedging relationships, the Company formally documents the hedging relationships and its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transactions, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed and a description of the method of measuring ineffectiveness.  The Company also formally assesses both, at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items.  When it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

 

Changes in the fair value of floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps, treasury locks or commodity futures and option contracts that are highly effective and that are designated and qualify as cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes.  Realized gains and losses associated with changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps and treasury locks are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to the Consolidated Statement of Income over the life of the underlying debt.  Gains and losses on hedges of foreign currency cash flows associated with certain forecasted commercial transactions or loans are reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income when such transactions or obligations are settled.  Gains and losses on commodity hedging contracts are reclassified from AOCI to the Consolidated Statement of Income when the finished goods produced using the hedged item are sold.  The maximum term over which the Company hedges exposures to the variability of cash flows for commodity price risk is generally 24 months.   Changes in the fair value of a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreement that is highly effective and that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with the loss or gain on the hedged debt obligation, are recorded in earnings.  The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument that qualifies as either a cash-flow hedge or a fair-value hedge is reported in earnings.

62



Table of Contents

 

The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows or fair value of the hedged item, the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur, or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company continues to carry the derivative on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at its fair value, and gains and losses that were included in AOCI are recognized in earnings.earnings in the same line item affected by the hedged transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings, or in the month a hedge is determined to be ineffective.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options to manage the transactional foreign exchange risk that is created when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued.  The changes in fair value of these derivative instruments and the offsetting changes in the value of the underlying non-functional currency denominated transactions are recorded in earnings on a monthly basis.

 

Stock-based compensation — The Company has a stock incentive plan that provides for stock-based employee compensation, including the granting of stock options, and shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares to certain key employees.  Compensation expense is recognized in the Consolidated StatementStatements of Income for the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plan.  The plan is more fully described in Note 12.11.

 

Earnings per common share — Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Ingredion by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, which totaled 73.6 million for 2014, 77.0 million for 2013 and 76.5 million for 2012, 76.4 million for 2011 and 75.6 million for 2010.2012.  Diluted earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income attributable to Ingredion by the weighted average number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and other instruments associated with long-term incentive compensation plans.  The weighted average number of

59



Table of Contents

shares outstanding for diluted EPS calculations was 74.9 million, 78.3 million and 78.2 million 78.2 millionfor 2014, 2013 and 76.8 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  In 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, options to purchase approximately 0.90.1 million, 0.4 million and 1.40.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS because their effects were anti-dilutive.

 

Risks and uncertainties — The Company operates domestically and internationally.  In each country, the business and assets are subject to varying degrees of risk and uncertainty. The Company insures its business and assets in each country against insurable risks in a manner that it deems appropriate.  Because of this geographic dispersion, the Company believes that a loss from non-insurable events in any one country would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations as a whole.  Additionally, the Company believes there is no significant concentration of risk with any single customer or supplier whose failure or non-performance would materially affect the Company’s results.

 

Recently adopted accounting standards — In June 2011,July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05,2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of Comprehensive Incomean Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.  .This Update provides guidance pertaining to the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists, to resolve diversity in practice.  The objectiveUpdate requires that companies present an unrecognized tax benefit as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a tax loss or credit carryforward on the balance sheet when (a) the tax law requires the company to use the tax loss or credit carryforward to satisfy amounts payable upon disallowance of the tax position; or (b) the tax loss or credit carryforward is available to satisfy amounts payable upon disallowance of the tax position, and the company intends to use the deferred tax asset for that purpose. The guidance in this Update is to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting with respect to comprehensive income.  This Update requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  Additionally, this Update requires an entity to present, on the face of the financial statements, reclassification adjustmentseffective prospectively for items that are reclassified from AOCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented.  In December 2011, the FASB deferred the effective date for those changes required in this Update relating to the presentation of reclassification adjustments.  Except for the presentation of reclassification adjustments, this Update was effective for interim and annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.2013, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company has changed its presentation of Comprehensive Income to immediately follow the Consolidated Statement of Income.  The implementation ofadopted the guidance contained in this Update prospectively and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment.  The objective of this Update is to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment.  This Update provides an entity with the option to first assess qualitative factors in determining whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount.  After assessing the qualitative factors, if an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.  If an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test as described in FASB ASC Topic 350.  Entities have the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step impairment test as well as resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.  The guidance in this Update was effective for the Company for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2011 and early adopted the provisions of this Update.  The implementation of the guidance contained in this Update did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-09, Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan.  This Update requires additional disclosures regarding the significant multiemployer plans in which an employer participates, the level of an employer’s participation including contributions made, and whether the contributions made represent more than five percent of the total contributions made to the plan by all contributing employers.  The expanded disclosures also address the financial health of significant multiemployer plans including the funded status and existence of funding improvement plans, the existence of imposed surcharges on contributions to the plan, as well as the nature of employer commitments to the plan.  This Update was effective for annual periods for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted.  The disclosures required by this Update are provided in Note 9.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.  The objective of this Update is to simplify how entities test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment and improve the consistency of impairment testing guidance among long-lived asset categories.   This Update provides an entity with the option to assess qualitative factors in determining whether it is more likely than not that an

6063



Table of Contents

 

indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform quantitative impairment testing.  After assessing the qualitative factors, if an entity determines that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount then it would not be required to compute the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset.  In the event the qualitative assessment leads an entity to conclude otherwise then the entity would be required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with ASC subtopic 350-30.  The guidance in this Update is effective for the Company for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company early adopted the provisions of this Update in the fourth quarter of 2012.  The implementation of the guidance contained in this Update did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 — AcquisitionsAcquisition

 

On October 1, 2010,14, 2014, the Company completed its acquisitionentered into an Agreement and Plan of National Starch,Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Penford Corporation, a global provider of specialty starches, from Akzo Nobel N.V.Washington corporation (“Penford”), Prospect Sub, Inc., a global coatingsWashington corporation and specialty chemicals company, headquartereda wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), and the Company.  The Merger Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement were unanimously approved by the Company’s board of directors.

The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Penford, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in The Netherlands.  Thethe Merger Agreement (the “Merger”), with Penford continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger.  As a result of the Merger, Penford will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share (a “Share”) of common stock of Penford (“Penford Common Stock”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than (a) Shares owned by the Company acquired 100 percentor Merger Sub, or by any subsidiary of National Starch through asset purchasesthe Company

64



Table of Contents

or Merger Sub, immediately prior to the Effective Time and (b) Shares outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and held by a holder who is entitled to exercise dissenters’ rights and properly exercises dissenters’ rights under Washington law with respect to such Shares, will be converted into the right to receive $19.00 in certain countriescash per Share, without interest and stock purchases in certain countries.subject to and reduced by the amount of any tax withholding.  As of the date of the Merger Agreement, Penford had 12,735,038 outstanding Shares and 1,429,000 Shares underlying outstanding options.  Outstanding borrowings under Penford’s revolving credit agreement will become due as a result of the Merger.   The purchase price was $1.369 billion in cash.is estimated to be $340 million, including the assumption of debt.  The fundingCompany expects to fund the acquisition of the purchase price was provided principallyPenford with available cash and proceeds from borrowings.  See Note 6 for information regardingborrowings under the Company’s borrowing activity.  The Company incurred $35revolving credit agreement.

Penford, headquartered in Centennial, Colorado had net sales of $444 million of acquisition costsfor the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014.  Penford employs approximately 443 people and a $20 million charge for bridge loan financing costs related to the acquisition in 2010.  The results of National Starch are includedoperates six plants in the Company’s consolidated results from October 1, 2010 forward.United States, all of which manufacture specialty starches.

 

The acquisition providedMerger has been approved by the Company with a broader portfolioshareholders of products, enhanced geographic reach, andPenford.  The consummation of the abilityMerger is subject to offer customers a broad rangethe satisfaction or waiver of value-added ingredient solutions for a variety of their evolving needs.   National Starch had sales of $1.2 billion in 2009 and provided the Company with,specified closing conditions, including, among other things, 11 additional manufacturing facilities in 8 countries, across 5 continents.(a) the receipt of certain required antitrust approvals and (b) other specified customary closing conditions.  The acquisition also provided additional sales and technical offices around the world.  With the acquisition, the Company now operates 36 manufacturing facilities in 14 countries; has sales offices in 29 countries, and has research and ingredient development centers in key global markets.

Pro forma financial information:

Selected unaudited pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, assuming the National Starch acquisition occurredMerger could close as of January 1, 2009, are presented below:

(in millions, except per share) 

 

2010

 

Net sales

 

$

5,323

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

283

 

Pro forma earnings per common share of Ingredion:

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

3.74

 

Diluted

 

$

3.68

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the National Starch financial statements excluded the effects of financing and taxes since Akzo Nobel, its previous parent company, used a centralized approach for cash management and to finance its global operations,early as well as to manage its global tax position.  A 33 percent tax rate was used to tax effect pro forma adjustments.March, 2015.

 

NOTE 4 — RestructuringImpairment and Asset ImpairmentRestructuring Charges

The Company assesses goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise).  The Company has chosen to perform this annual impairment assessment as of October 1 of each year.   The results of the Company’s impairment testing in the fourth quarter of 2014 indicated that the estimated fair value of the Company’s Southern Cone of South America reporting unit was less than its carrying amount primarily due to the impacts on its fair value of the elongation of unfavorable financial trends, such as the impact of higher production costs and the Company’s inability to increase selling prices to a level sufficient to recover the impacts of inflation and currency devaluation.  Also, the political and economic volatility in the region and continued uncertainty in Argentina negatively impacted earnings forecasts for the reporting unit in the near term.   Therefore, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $33 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 to write-off the remaining balance of goodwill for this reporting unit.

 

In the second quarter of 2012, the Company decided to restructure its business operations in Kenya and to close its manufacturing plant in the country.  As part of that decision, the Company recorded $20 million of restructuring charges to its Statement of Income consisting of an $8 million charge to realize the cumulative translation adjustment associated with the Kenyan operations, a $6 million fixed asset impairment charge, a $2 million charge to reduce certain working capital balances to net realizable value based on the announced closure, $2 million of costs primarily consisting of severance pay related to the termination of the majority of its employees in Kenya and $2 million of additional charges related to this restructuring.

 

61



Table of Contents

As part of the Company’s ongoing strategic optimization, in the third quarter of 2012, the Company decided to exit its investment in Shouguang Golden Far East Modified Starch Co., Ltd (“GFEMS”), a non wholly-ownednon-wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary in China.  In conjunction with that decision, the Company recorded a $4 million impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of GFEMS to its estimated net realizable value.  The Company also recorded a $1 million charge for impaired assets in Colombia in the third quarter of 2012.  The Company sold its interest in GFEMS in the fourth quarter of 2012 for $3 million in cash, which approximated the carrying value of the investment in GFEMS following the aforementioned impairment charge.

 

Additionally, as part of a manufacturing optimization program developed in conjunction with the acquisition of National Starch to improve profitability, in the second quarter of 2011 the Company committed to a plan to optimize its production capabilities at certain of its North American facilities.  The plan was completed in October 2012.  As a result, the Company recorded restructuring charges to write-off certain equipment by the plan completion date.  These charges totaled $11 million and $10 million in 2012, and 2011, respectively, of which $10 million and $8 million represented accelerated depreciation on the equipment.  The equipment has been completely written off.

 

On February 27, 2010, a devastating earthquake occurred off the coast65



Table of Chile.  The Company’s plant in Llay-Llay, Chile suffered damage, including damage to the waste-water treatment facility, corn silos, water tanks and warehousing.  There was also structural damage to the buildings.  A structural engineering study was completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  Based on the results of the study and other factors, the Company determined that the carrying amount of a significant portion of the plant and equipment exceeded its fair value and therefore, these assets were impaired.  As a result, the Company recorded a $24 million charge for impaired assets and employee severance and related benefit costs associated with the termination of employees in Chile in its 2010 Statement of Income.  As of December 31, 2010, the employee terminations were completed and the restructuring accrual was fully utilized. Shipments to customers in Chile are being fulfilled from the Company’s plants in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.  In December 2012, the Company sold the land for approximately $2 million in cash.Contents

 

NOTE 5 — Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Activities

 

The Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in commodity prices (corn and natural gas), foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.  In the normal course of business, the Company actively manages its exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions, authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities.  These transactions utilize exchange-traded derivatives or over-the-counter derivatives with investment gradeinvestment-grade counterparties.  Derivative financial instruments currently used by the Company consist of commodity futures, options and swap contracts, foreign currency forward currency contracts, swaps and options, and interest rate swaps.

 

Commodity price hedging: The Company’s principal use of derivative financial instruments is to manage commodity price risk in North America relating to anticipated purchases of corn and natural gas to be used in the manufacturing process, generally over the next twelve to eighteentwenty-four months.  The Company maintains a commodity-price risk management strategy that uses derivative instruments to minimize significant, unanticipated earnings fluctuations caused by commodity-price volatility.  For example, the manufacturing of the Company’s products requires a significant volume of corn and natural gas.  Price fluctuations in corn and natural gas cause the actual purchase price of corn and natural gas to differ from anticipated prices.

 

To manage price risk related to corn purchases in North America, the Company uses corn futures and options contracts that trade on regulated commodity exchanges to lock in its corn costs associated with firm-priced customer sales contracts.  The Company uses over-the-counter gas swaps to hedge a portion of its natural gas usage in North America.  These derivative financial instruments limit the impact that volatility resulting from fluctuations in market prices will have on corn and natural gas purchases and have been designated as cash flowcash-flow hedges.  Unrealized gains and losses associated with marking the commodity hedging contracts to market (fair value) are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and included in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets as part of AOCI.  These amounts are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the monthsame line item affected by the hedged transaction and in the same period or periods during which the related corn or natural gas impactshedged transaction affects earnings, or in the month a hedge is determined to be ineffective.  The Company assesses the effectiveness of a commodity hedge contract based on changes in the contract’s fair value.  The

62



Table of Contents

changes in the market value of such contracts have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in the price of the hedged items.  The amounts representing the ineffectiveness of these cashcash- flow hedges are not significant.

 

At December 31, 2012,2014 and 2013, AOCI included $7$13 million of losses net(net of tax of $4$6 million) and $32 million of losses (net of tax of $15 million), respectively, pertaining to commodities-related derivative instruments designated as cash-flow hedges, of which $3 million, net of tax of $2 million, are expected to be recognized in earnings within the next twelve months.  Transactions and events expected to occur over the next twelve months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivative losses to earnings include the sale of finished goods inventory that includes previously hedged purchases of corn and natural gas.  The Company expects the losses to be offset by changes in the underlying commodities cost.  Cash flow hedges discontinued during 2012 were not material.hedges.

 

Interest rate hedging:  The Company assesses its exposure to variability in interest rates by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rates that may adversely impact future cash flows and the fair value of existing debt instruments, and by evaluating hedging opportunities.  The Company maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate risk attributable to both the Company’s outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as the Company’s offsetting hedge positions.  The risk management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including sensitivity analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on future cash flows and the fair value of the Company’s outstanding and forecasted debt instruments.

 

Derivative financial instruments that have been used by the Company to manage its interest rate risk consist of Treasury Lock agreements (“T-Locks”) and interest rate swaps.  The Company periodically enters into T-Locks to fix the benchmark component of the interest rate to be established for certain planned fixed-rate debt issuances (see also Note 6).issuances.  The T-Locks are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate until the fixed interest rate is established, and are accounted for as cash-flow hedges.  Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the T-Locks are recorded to AOCI until the consummation of the underlying debt offering, at which time any realized gain (loss) is amortized to earnings over the life of the debt.  The net gain or loss recognized in earnings during 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010, representing the amount of the Company’s hedges’ ineffectiveness,2012 was not significant.  The Company has also, from time to time, enteredenters into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convertedconvert the interest rate on certain fixed-rate debt to a variable rate.  These swaps calledcall for the Company to receive interest at a fixed rate and to pay interest at a variable rate, thereby creating the equivalent of variable-rate debt.  The Company designateddesignates these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligation attributable to changes in interest rates and accountedaccounts for them as fair valuefair-value hedges.  Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps designated as hedging instruments that effectively offset the

66



Table of Contents

variability in the fair value of outstanding debt obligations are reported in earnings.  These amounts offset the gain or loss (that is, the change in fair value) of the hedged debt instrument that is attributable to changes in interest rates (that is, the hedged risk) which is also recognized in earnings.  The Company did not have any T-Locks outstanding at December 31, 20122014 or 2011.2013.  At December 31, 2014 and 2013, AOCI included $7 million of losses (net of income taxes of $4 million) and $8 million of losses (net of income taxes of $5 million), respectively, related to settled T-Locks.  These deferred losses are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the senior notes with which they are associated.

 

On March 25, 2011,In September 2014, the Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rates on its 6.0 percent $200 million senior notes due April 15, 2017, its 1.8 percent $300 million senior notes due September 25, 2017 and on $200 million of its $400 million 4.625 percent senior notes due November 1, 2020, to variable rates.  Additionally, the Company has interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate on the Company’sits 3.2 percent $350 million senior notes due November 1, 2015 to a variable rate.   These swap agreements call for the Company to receive interest at athe fixed coupon rate (3.2 percent)of the respective notes and to pay interest at a variable rate based on the six-month US dollar LIBOR rate plus a spread.  The Company has designated these interest rate swap agreements as hedges of the changes in fair value of the underlying debt obligationobligations attributable to changes in interest rates and accounts for them as fair valuefair-value hedges.  The fair value of these interest rate swap agreements approximated $20was $13 million at both December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2013, and is reflected in the Consolidated Balance SheetSheets within non-currentother assets, with an offsetting amount recorded in long-term debt to adjust the carrying amount of the hedged debt obligation.

In connection with the acquisition of National Starch, on September 17, 2010, the Company issued and sold $900 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”).  The Notes consist of $350 million aggregate principal amount of 3.2 percent notes due November 1, 2015 (the “2015 Notes”), $400 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625 percent notes due November 1, 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), and $150 million aggregate principal amount of 6.625 percent notes due April 15, 2037.  See Note 6 for additional information regarding the Notes.In anticipation of the issuance these long-term fixed-rate Notes, the Company entered into T-Lock agreements with respect to $300 million of the 2015 Notes and $300 million of the 2020 Notes.  These T-Lock agreements were designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows associated with future interest payments

63



Table of Contents

caused by market fluctuations in the benchmark interest rate between the time the T-Locks were entered into and the time the debt was priced and are accounted for as cash flow hedges.  The T-Locks were terminated on September 15, 2010 and the Company paid approximately $15 million, representing the losses on the T-Locks, to settle the agreements.  The losses are included in AOCI and are being amortized to financing costs over the terms of the 2015 and 2020 Notes.

At December 31, 2012, AOCI included $10 million of losses, net of tax of $6 million, related to T-Locks, of which $2 million, net of tax of $1 million, are expected to be recognized in earnings within the next twelve months.  Cash flow hedges discontinued during 2012 were not material.obligations.

 

Foreign currency hedging:  Due to the Company’s global operations, including many emerging markets, it is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.  As a result, the Company has exposure to translational foreign exchange risk when the results of its foreign operation resultsoperations are translated to US dollars and to transactional foreign exchange risk when transactions not denominated in the functional currency of the operating unit are revalued.  The Company primarily uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options to manage its transactional foreign exchange risk.  These derivative financial instruments are primarily accounted for as fair value hedges.  At December 31, 2012,2014, the Company had $268 million of foreign currency forward sales contracts and $167with an aggregate notional amount of $150 million ofand foreign currency forward purchase contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $70 million that hedged transactional exposures.  At December 31, 2011,2013, the Company had $287 million of foreign currency forward sales contracts and $163with an aggregate notional amount of $147 million ofand foreign currency forward purchase contracts with an aggregate notional amount of $78 million that hedged transactional exposures.  The fair value of these derivative instruments was approximately $5 million andwere assets of $1 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,liabilities of $5 million at December 31, 2013, respectively.

The Company also has foreign currency derivative instruments that hedge certain foreign currency transactional exposures and are designated as cash-flow hedges. The amounts included in AOCI relating to these hedges at both December 31, 2014 and 2013 were not significant.

 

By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures, the Company exposes itself to credit risk and market risk.  Credit risk is the risk that the counterparty will fail to perform under the terms of the derivative contract.  When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit risk for the Company.  When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Company owes the counterparty and, therefore, it does not possess credit risk.  The Company minimizes the credit risk in derivative instruments by entering into over-the-counter transactions only with investment grade counterparties or by utilizing exchange-traded derivatives.  Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in commodity prices, interest rates or foreign exchange rates.  The market risk associated with commodity-price, interest rate or foreign exchange contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken.

 

The fair value and balance sheet location of the Company’s derivative instruments accounted for as cash flowcash-flow hedges are presented below:

 

 

 

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments:
(in millions) 

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

At
December 31,
2012

 

At
December 31,
2011

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

At
December 31,
2012

 

At
December 31,
2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

Accounts receivable-net

 

$

5

 

$

14

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

34

 

$

34

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities

 

6

 

11

 

Total

 

 

 

$

5

 

$

14

 

 

 

$

40

 

$

45

 

67



Table of Contents

 

 

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

 

Derivatives designated as 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

cash-flow hedging 
instruments:
(in millions) 

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

At
December 31, 
2014

 

At
December 31, 
2013

 

Balance Sheet
Location

 

At
December 31, 
2014

 

At
December 31, 
2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

Accounts receivable-net

 

$

15

 

$

2

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

18

 

$

27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

Other assets

 

1

 

5

 

Non-current liabilities

 

6

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

16

 

$

7

 

 

 

$

24

 

$

27

 

 

At December 31, 2012,2014, the Company had outstanding futures and option contracts that hedged the forecasted purchase of approximately 9793 million bushels of forecasted corn purchases.  Alsoand 4 million pounds of soybean oil.  The Company is unable to directly hedge price risk related to co-product sales; however, it occasionally enters into hedges of soybean oil (a competing product to corn oil) in order to mitigate the price risk of corn oil sales.  Additionally at December 31, 2012,2014, the Company had outstanding swap and option contracts that hedged the forecasted purchase of approximately 1814 million mmbtu’s of forecasted natural gas purchases.gas.

 

Additional information relating to the Company’s derivative instruments is presented below (in millions)millions, pre-tax):

 

Derivatives in 

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives

 

Location of Gains 
(Losses) 

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)
Reclassified from AOCI into Income

 

Cash-Flow 
Hedging 
Relationships

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2014

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2013

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2012

 

Reclassified from 
AOCI
into Income

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2014

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2013

 

Year Ended 
December 31, 
2012

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

$

(41

)

$

(93

)

$

68

 

Cost of Sales

 

$

(70

)

$

(57

)

$

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

Financing
costs, net

 

(3

)

(3

)

(3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(41

)

$

(93

)

$

68

 

 

 

$

(73

)

$

(60

)

$

40

 

64



TableAt December 31, 2014, AOCI included approximately $13 million of Contentslosses, net of income taxes of $6 million, on commodities-related derivative instruments designated as cash-flow hedges that are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.  Transactions and events expected to occur over the next twelve months that will necessitate reclassifying these derivative losses to earnings include the sale of finished goods inventory that includes previously hedged purchases of corn and natural gas.  The Company expects the losses to be offset by changes in the underlying commodities cost.  Additionally at December 31, 2014, AOCI included $2 million of losses on settled T-Locks (net of income taxes of $1 million) and $1 million of gains related to foreign currency hedges (net of income taxes of $1 million), which are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months.   Cash-flow hedges discontinued during 2014 or 2013 were not significant.

Derivatives in

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)
Recognized in OCI on Derivatives

 

Location of Gains
(Losses)

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)
Reclassified from AOCI into Income

 

Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2012

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2011

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2010

 

Reclassified from
AOCI
into Income

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2012

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2011

 

Year Ended
December 31,
2010

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

$

68

 

$

48

 

$

47

 

Cost of Sales

 

$

43

 

$

169

 

$

(87

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

(15

)

Financing costs, net

 

(3

)

(3

)

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

68

 

$

48

 

$

32

 

 

 

$

40

 

$

166

 

$

(88

)

 

Presented below are the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments and derivatives for the periods presented:

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

(in millions)

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Available for sale securities

 

$

3

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

Derivative assets

 

25

 

5

 

20

 

 

33

 

14

 

19

 

 

Derivative liabilities

 

45

 

24

 

21

 

 

46

 

16

 

30

 

 

Long-term debt

 

1,914

 

 

1,914

 

 

1,921

 

 

1,921

 

 

68



Table of Contents

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

(in millions)

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Available for sale securities

 

$

5

 

$

5

 

$

 

$

 

$

4

 

$

4

 

$

 

$

 

Derivative assets

 

29

 

12

 

17

 

 

20

 

 

20

 

 

Derivative liabilities

 

23

 

6

 

17

 

 

32

 

22

 

10

 

 

Long-term debt

 

1,939

 

 

1,939

 

 

1,813

 

 

1,813

 

 

 

Level 1 inputs consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.  Level 2 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.   Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.  Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

 

The carrying values of cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate fair values.  Commodity futures, options and swap contracts are recognized at fair value.  Foreign currency forward contracts, swaps and options are also recognized at fair value.  The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on quotations of major securities dealers who are market makers in the securities.  Presented below are the carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 20122014 and 2011.2013.

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
value

 

Carrying
amount

 

Fair
value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020

 

$

399

 

$

448

 

$

399

 

$

422

 

3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015

 

350

 

368

 

350

 

360

 

1.8% senior notes, due September 25, 2017

 

298

 

300

 

 

 

6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037

 

257

 

315

 

257

 

297

 

6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017

 

200

 

227

 

200

 

222

 

5.62% senior notes due March 25, 2020

 

200

 

236

 

200

 

225

 

US revolving credit facility, due October 22, 2017

 

 

 

376

 

376

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt

 

20

 

20

 

19

 

19

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

1,724

 

$

1,914

 

$

1,801

 

$

1,921

 

65



Table of Contents

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

(in millions)

 

Carrying 
amount

 

Fair
 value

 

Carrying 
amount

 

Fair
 value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.625% senior notes due November 1, 2020

 

$

399

 

$

427

 

$

399

 

$

420

 

3.2% senior notes due November 1, 2015

 

350

 

356

 

350

 

363

 

1.8% senior notes due September 25, 2017

 

299

 

302

 

298

 

296

 

6.625% senior notes due April 15, 2037

 

256

 

312

 

257

 

281

 

6.0% senior notes due April 15, 2017

 

200

 

220

 

200

 

219

 

5.62% senior notes due March 25, 2020

 

200

 

222

 

200

 

221

 

U.S. revolving credit facility due October 22, 2017

 

87

 

87

 

 

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument

 

13

 

13

 

13

 

13

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

1,804

 

$

1,939

 

$

1,717

 

$

1,813

 

 

NOTE 6 — Financing Arrangements

 

The Company had total debt outstanding of $1.80$1.83 billion and $1.95$1.81 billion at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.  Short-term borrowings at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 consist primarily of amounts outstanding under various unsecured local country operating lines of credit.

 

Short-term borrowings consist of the following at December 31:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Short-term borrowings in various currencies (at rates ranging from

 

 

 

 

 

1% to 7% for 2012 and 2% to 24% for 2011)

 

$

76

 

$

148

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Short-term borrowings in various currencies (at rates ranging from 1% to 7% for 2014 and 1% to 11% for 2013)

 

$

23

 

$

93

 

 

On October 22, 2012, theThe Company entered intohas a new five-year, senior, unsecured $1 billion revolving credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) that replaced our previously existing $1 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that was set to expire in June 2014.  The Company paid fees of approximately $3 million relating to the new credit facility, which are being amortized to financing costs over the term of the facility.matures on October 22, 2017.

 

Subject to certain terms and conditions, the Company may increase the amount of the revolving facility under the Revolving Credit Agreement by up to $250 million in the aggregate.  All committed pro rata borrowings under the revolving facility will bear interest at a variable annual rate based on the LIBOR or prime rate, at the Company’s election, subject to the terms and conditions thereof, plus, in each case, an applicable margin based on the

69



Table of Contents

Company’s leverage ratio (as reported in the financial statements delivered pursuant to the Revolving Credit Agreement).

 

The Revolving Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, events of default, terms and conditions, including limitations on liens, incurrence of debt, mergers and significant asset dispositions.  The Company must also comply with a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio covenant.  The occurrence of an event of default under the Revolving Credit Agreement could result in all loans and other obligations under the agreement being declared due and payable and the revolving credit facility being terminated.

 

The Company had noAt December 31, 2014, there were $87 million of borrowings outstanding under its $1 billion revolving credit facility at December 31, 2012.the Revolving Credit Agreement.  In addition to borrowing availability under its Revolving Credit Agreement, the Company has approximately $503$485 million of unused operating lines of credit in the various foreign countries in which it operates.

 

On September 20, 2012, the Company issued 1.80 percent Senior Notes due September 25, 2017 in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million.  These notes rank equally with the Company’s other senior unsecured debt.  Interest on the notes is required to be paid semi-annually on March 25th and September 25th, beginning in March 2013.  The notes are subject to optional prepayment by the Company at 100 percent of the principal amount plus interest up to the prepayment date and, in certain circumstances, a make-whole amount.  The net proceeds from the sale of the notes of approximately $297 million were used to repay $205 million of borrowings under the Company’s previously existing $1 billion revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.  The Company paid debt issuance costs of approximately $2 million relating to the notes, which are being amortized to financing costs over the life of the notes.

66



Table of Contents

Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

4.625% senior notes, due November 1, 2020, net of discount of $1

 

$

399

 

$

399

 

3.2% senior notes, due November 1, 2015

 

350

 

350

 

1.8% senior notes, due September 25, 2017, net of discount of $2

 

298

 

 

6.625% senior notes, due April 15, 2037, net of premium of $8 and discount of $1

 

257

 

257

 

6.0% senior notes, due April 15, 2017

 

200

 

200

 

5.62% senior notes, due March 25, 2020

 

200

 

200

 

US revolving credit facility, due October 22, 2017 (at LIBOR indexed floating rate)

 

 

376

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument

 

20

 

19

 

Total

 

$

1,724

 

$

1,801

 

Less: current maturities

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

$

1,724

 

$

1,801

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

4.625% senior notes due November 1, 2020, net of discount of $1

 

$

399

 

$

399

 

3.2% senior notes due November 1, 2015

 

350

 

350

 

1.8% senior notes due September 25, 2017, net of discount of $1 and $2, respectively

 

299

 

298

 

6.625% senior notes due April 15, 2037, including premium of $6 and $7, respectively

 

256

 

257

 

6.0% senior notes due April 15, 2017

 

200

 

200

 

5.62% senior notes due March 25, 2020

 

200

 

200

 

U.S. revolving credit facility due October 22, 2017

 

87

 

 

Fair value adjustment related to hedged fixed rate debt instrument

 

13

 

13

 

Total

 

$

1,804

 

$

1,717

 

Less: current maturities

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

$

1,804

 

$

1,717

 

 

The Company’s long-term debt matures as follows: $350 million in 2015, $500$587 million in 2017, $600 million in 2020 and $250 million in 2037. The Company’s long-term debt at December 31, 2014 includes $350 million of 3.2 percent senior notes that mature November 1, 2015.  These borrowings are included in long-term debt as the Company has the ability and intent to refinance the notes on a long-term basis prior to the maturity date.

 

Ingredion Incorporated guarantees certain obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries.  The amount of the obligations guaranteed aggregated $57$214 million and $77$225 million at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, respectively.

 

NOTE 7 - Leases

 

The Company leases rail cars, certain machinery and equipment, and office space under various operating leases.  Rental expense under operating leases was $47 million, $47 million and $45 million $44 millionin 2014, 2013 and $33 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Minimum lease payments due on non-cancellable leases existing at December 31, 20122014 are shown below:

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

Minimum Lease Payments

 

 

Minimum Lease Payments

 

2013

 

$

41

 

2014

 

34

 

2015

 

29

 

 

$

41

 

 

 

 

2016

 

25

 

 

36

 

 

 

 

2017

 

18

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

2018

 

22

 

 

 

 

2019

 

19

 

 

 

 

Balance thereafter

 

38

 

 

28

 

 

6770



Table of Contents

NOTE 8 - Income Taxes

 

The components of income before income taxes and the provision for income taxes are shown below:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Income (loss) before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

91

 

$

158

 

$

(26

)

 

$

83

 

$

138

 

$

91

 

Foreign

 

510

 

435

 

301

 

 

437

 

409

 

510

 

Total

 

$

601

 

$

593

 

$

275

 

 

$

520

 

$

547

 

$

601

 

Provision for income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current tax expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US federal

 

$

3

 

$

9

 

$

(4

)

 

$

8

 

$

5

 

$

3

 

State and local

 

1

 

2

 

2

 

 

1

 

3

 

1

 

Foreign

 

166

 

141

 

131

 

 

159

 

106

 

166

 

Total current

 

$

170

 

$

152

 

$

129

 

 

$

168

 

$

114

 

$

170

 

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US federal

 

$

(5

)

$

10

 

$

(8

)

 

$

(16

)

$

11

 

$

(5

)

State and local

 

2

 

3

 

(1

)

 

(2

)

(2

)

2

 

Foreign

 

 

5

 

(21

)

 

7

 

21

 

 

Total deferred

 

$

(3

)

$

18

 

$

(30

)

 

$

(11

)

$

30

 

$

(3

)

Total provision for income taxes

 

$

167

 

$

170

 

$

99

 

 

$

157

 

$

144

 

$

167

 

 

Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities.  Significant temporary differences at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 are summarized as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Deferred tax assets attributable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employee benefit accruals

 

$

19

 

$

17

 

 

$

23

 

$

23

 

Pensions and postretirement medical

 

65

 

42

 

Hedging/derivative contracts

 

10

 

19

 

Pensions and postretirement plans

 

30

 

24

 

Derivative contracts

 

9

 

20

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

23

 

29

 

 

11

 

16

 

Foreign tax credit carryforwards

 

24

 

29

 

 

 

11

 

Other

 

53

 

37

 

 

30

 

42

 

Gross deferred tax assets

 

$

194

 

$

173

 

 

$

103

 

$

136

 

Valuation allowance

 

(9

)

(23

)

 

(3

)

(3

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

185

 

$

150

 

 

$

100

 

$

133

 

Deferred tax liabilities attributable to:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

$

202

 

$

191

 

 

$

194

 

$

200

 

Identified intangibles

 

59

 

68

 

 

34

 

57

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

$

261

 

$

259

 

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

$

228

 

$

257

 

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

$

76

 

$

109

 

 

$

128

 

$

124

 

 

Of the $23$11 million of tax effectedtax-effected net operating loss carryforwards at December 31, 2012,2014, approximately $16$7 million are in Korea, and willare scheduled to expire in 2019 through 2021, if unused.2021.  The Company anticipates full utilization of the Korean carryforward.  The tax value of the foreign tax credit carryforwards of $24 million at December 31,

68



Table of Contents

2012 are scheduled to expire in 2014 through 2022.  The Company anticipates full utilization of the foreign tax credits before any expiration.

Income tax accounting requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.  In making this assessment, management considers the level of historical taxable income, scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning

71



Table of Contents

strategies, tax carryovers and projected future taxable income.  At December 31, 2012,2014, the Company maintains valuation allowances of $9 million against approximately $6 million of foreign operating loss carryforwards, $2 million offor state loss carryforwards and $1 million of US capital loss carryforwardfor foreign net operating losses that management has determined will more likely than not expire prior to realization.  The valuation allowance with respect to certain foreign net operating losses and net deferred tax assets decreased to approximately $6 million at December 31, 2012, from $23 million at December 31, 2011. The Company released the $15 million valuation allowance ($13 million discrete in the second quarter of 2012) on the net deferred tax assets of Korea during 2012.  The Korean 36-month cumulative pretax income balance turned positive in 2012, and management has evaluated the realizability of the net deferred tax assets using all of the available evidence, both positive and negative, and concluded that it is more likely than not that the Korean deferred tax asset will be realized.  Also, during 2012 the Company recognized an impairment charge for virtually all of the assets of its Kenyan subsidiary and ceased to conduct business in the ordinary course.  Given the full asset impairment and no expectation of future utilization, the $3 million of net deferred tax assets and related $3 million of valuation allowance at December 31, 2011, have been extinguished during 2012.

 

A reconciliation of the US federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate follows:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Provision for tax at US statutory rate

 

35.00

%

35.00

%

35.00

%

 

35.00

%

35.00

%

35.00

%

Tax rate difference on foreign income

 

(3.86

)

(3.62

)

.31

 

 

(6.26

)

(5.28

)

(3.86

)

State and local taxes — net

 

.79

 

.58

 

.15

 

 

0.13

 

0.35

 

0.79

 

Change in valuation allowance — foreign tax credits

 

 

(.62

)

(2.26

)

Nondeductible goodwill impairment - Southern Cone

 

2.18

 

 

 

Reversal of Korea valuation allowance

 

(2.52

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2.52

)

Reversal of Chile valuation allowance

 

(.06

)

(.09

)

2.13

 

Non-deductible National Starch acquisition costs

 

.04

 

.04

 

1.22

 

NAFTA Award

 

 

(3.45

)

 

Other items — net

 

(1.61

)

.83

 

(.46

)

 

(0.86

)

(3.74

)

(1.63

)

Provision at effective tax rate

 

27.78

%

28.67

%

36.09

%

 

30.19

%

26.33

%

27.78

%

The Company has significant operations in Canada, Mexico and Thailand where the statutory tax rates are 25 percent, 30 percent and 20 percent, respectively.  In addition, the Company’s subsidiary in Brazil has a lower effective tax rate of 26 percent including local tax incentives.

The Company uses the US dollar as the functional currency for its subsidiaries in Mexico.  Because of the decline in the value of the Mexican peso versus the US dollar, primarily late in 2014, the Mexican tax provision includes an unfavorable impact of approximately $7 million, or 1.3 percentage points in the effective tax rate, primarily associated with foreign currency transaction gains for local income tax purposes on net US dollar monetary assets held in Mexico for which there is no corresponding gain in pre-tax income.  This impact is included in the rate reconciliation as “Other”.  In the third quarter, the Company recognized an unfavorable impact of approximately $7 million, or 1.3 percentage points in the effective tax rate, for an audit result in a National Starch subsidiary related to a pre-acquisition period for which we are indemnified by Akzo Nobel N.V. (“Akzo”).  This impact of $5 million of tax and $2 million of interest is also included in the rate reconciliation as “Other”.  The $7 million of expense is recorded in the tax provision of the subsidiary, while the reimbursement from Akzo under the indemnity is recorded as other income.  A portion of the tax is being disputed, but as the Company is fully indemnified for this pre-acquisition obligation, the impact on net income is zero in all cases.

 

Provisions are made for estimated US and foreign income taxes, less credits that may be available, on distributions from foreign subsidiaries to the extent dividends are anticipated.  No provision has been made for income taxes on approximately $1.585$2.172 billion of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries at December 31, 2012,2014, as such amounts are considered permanently reinvested.  It is not practicable to estimate the additional income taxes, including applicable withholding taxes and credits that would be due upon the repatriation of these earnings.

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, for 20122014 and 20112013 is as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Balance at January 1

 

$

35

 

$

29

 

Additions for tax positions related to prior years

 

3

 

9

 

Reductions for tax positions related to prior years

 

 

(1

)

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

 

6

 

4

 

Reductions related to a lapse in the statute of limitations

 

(7

)

(6

)

Balance at December 31

 

$

37

 

$

35

 

69



Table of Contents

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Balance at January 1

 

$

34

 

$

37

 

Additions for tax positions related to prior years

 

6

 

5

 

Reductions for tax positions related to prior years

 

(5

)

(6

)

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

 

 

1

 

Reductions related to a lapse in the statute of limitations

 

(12

)

(3

)

Balance at December 31

 

$

23

 

$

34

 

 

Of the $37$23 million at December 31, 2012, $262014, $5 million represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate in future periods.  The remaining $11$18 million representswould include an offset of $13 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards that would otherwise be created as part of the Canada and US audit process described below.  In addition, $5 million of the unrecognized benefit would be offset by reversing a

72



Table of Contents

receivable recorded for indemnity claims that we would expect to collect from Akzo Nobel N.V. as part of the National Starch acquisition.

 

The Company accounts for interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.  The Company has accrued $2$6 million of interest expense (net of $4 million interest income) and $1 million of penalties related to the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012.2014.  The accrued interest expense was $4$5 million (net of $3 million interest income) and accrued penalties were $1 million of penalties as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

The Company is subject to US federal income tax as well as income tax in multiple state and non-US jurisdictions.  The US federal tax returns are subject to audit for the years 20092011 to 2012.  The Company remains2014.  In general, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries remain subject to potential examination in Canada, Argentinaaudit for years 2008 and Germany for the years 2005 to 2012, and in Brazil, Mexico and Pakistan for the years 2007 to 2012.  The statute of limitations is generally open for similar periods in various other non-US jurisdictions.later.

 

In 2008 and 2007, the Company made deposits of approximately $13 million and $17 million, respectively, to the Canadian tax authorities relating to an ongoing audit examination.  The Company did not make any additional deposits relating to this ongoing audit examination in 2012.examination.  The Company has settled $2 million of the claims and is in the process of pursuingcontinues to pursue relief from double taxation under the US and Canadian tax treaty for the remaining items raised in the audit.  As a result, the US and Canadian tax returns arewere subject to adjustment from 2000 and forward for the specific issues being contested.  During 2014, the countries reached an agreement that settled the issues for the years 2000 through 2003, and it is possible but not assured, that a conclusion could be reached on the remaining periods within 12 months of December 31, 2014.  The Company believes that it has adequately provided for the most likely outcome of the settlement process.

 

It is also reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within twelve months of December 31, 2012.2014.  The Company has classified $7$12 million of the unrecognized tax benefits as short termcurrent because they are expected to be resolved within the next twelve months.

 

NOTE 9 — Benefit Plans

 

The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all employees in the United States and Canada, and certain employees in other foreign countries. Plans for most salaried employees provide pay-related benefits based on years of service. Plans for hourly employees generally provide benefits based on flat dollar amounts and years of service. The Company’s general funding policy is to make contributions to the plans in amounts that comply with minimum funding requirements and are within the limits of deductibility under current tax regulations. Certain foreign countries allow income tax deductions without regard to contribution levels, and the Company’s policy in those countries is to make contributions required by the terms of the applicable plan.

 

DomesticUS salaried employees are covered by a defined benefit “cash balance” pension plan, which provides benefits based on service credits to the participating employees’ accounts of between 3 percent and 10 percent of base salary, bonus and overtime.

 

Included in the Company’s pension obligation are nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain key employees. All benefits provided under these plans are unfunded, and payments to plan participants are made by the Company.

 

The Company also provides healthcare and/or life insurance benefits for retired employees in the United States, Canada and Brazil.  Healthcare benefits for retirees outside of the United States, Canada, and Brazil are generally covered through local government plans.

In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company amended its retiree medical plan in the US for salaried employees.  This amendment required certain age and years of service requirements through December 31, 2014 in order to continue to participate in the plan.  As such, the number of eligible employees was significantly reduced.  For those eligible US salaried employees, they are provided with access to postretirement medical insurance through retirement healthcare spending accounts. US salaried employees accrue an account during employment, which can be used after employment to purchase postretirement medical insurance from the Company andprior to age 65, Medigap or through Medicare HMO policies after age 65. The accounts are credited with a flat dollar amount and indexed for inflation annually during employment. These credits will cease after December 31, 2014.  The accounts also accrue interest credits using a rate equal to a specified amount above the yield on five-year US Treasury notes. Employees can use the amounts accumulated in these accounts, including credited interest, to purchase postretirement medical

73



Table of Contents

insurance. Employees become eligible for benefits when they meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company

70



Table of Contents

recognizes the cost of these postretirement benefits by accruing a flat dollar amount on an annual basis for each domesticUS salaried employee.

 

Pension Obligation and Funded Status — The changes in pension benefit obligations and plan assets during 20122014 and 2011,2013, as well as the funded status and the amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets related to the Company’s pension plans at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, were as follows:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At January 1

 

$

271

 

$

244

 

$

216

 

$

205

 

 

$

293

 

$

323

 

$

250

 

$

272

 

Service cost

 

7

 

7

 

8

 

5

 

 

7

 

8

 

6

 

9

 

Interest cost

 

12

 

13

 

13

 

15

 

 

13

 

11

 

14

 

12

 

Benefits paid

 

(15

)

(13

)

(12

)

(11

)

 

(17

)

(14

)

(11

)

(12

)

Actuarial loss

 

48

 

19

 

34

 

12

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

22

 

(36

)

33

 

(15

)

Business combinations / transfers

 

 

 

12

 

8

 

 

 

1

 

(2

)

 

Plan amendment

 

 

1

 

 

 

Curtailment / settlement

 

 

 

(4

)

(11

)

Curtailment / settlement / amendments

 

(4

)

 

 

(2

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

5

 

(7

)

 

 

 

(23

)

(14

)

Benefit obligation at December 31

 

$

323

 

$

271

 

$

272

 

$

216

 

 

$

314

 

$

293

 

$

267

 

$

250

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At January 1

 

$

222

 

$

204

 

$

156

 

$

157

 

 

$

297

 

$

257

 

$

223

 

$

189

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

27

 

14

 

12

 

8

 

 

30

 

41

 

28

 

16

 

Employer contributions

 

23

 

17

 

15

 

15

 

 

6

 

13

 

11

 

43

 

Benefits paid

 

(15

)

(13

)

(12

)

(11

)

 

(17

)

(14

)

(11

)

(12

)

Settlements

 

 

 

 

(11

)

Business combinations / transfers

 

 

 

15

 

3

 

Plan settlements

 

(3

)

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

3

 

(5

)

 

 

 

(19

)

(13

)

Fair value of plan assets at December 31

 

$

257

 

$

222

 

$

189

 

$

156

 

 

$

313

 

$

297

 

$

232

 

$

223

 

Funded status

 

$

(66

)

$

(49

)

$

(83

)

$

(60

)

 

$

(1

)

$

4

 

$

(35

)

$

(27

)

 

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 were as follows:

 

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Noncurrent asset

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

Current liabilities

 

(1

)

 

(3

)

(2

)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(65

)

(49

)

(81

)

(59

)

Net liability recognized

 

$

(66

)

$

(49

)

$

(83

)

$

(60

)

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Non-current asset

 

$

12

 

$

16

 

$

18

 

$

26

 

Current liabilities

 

(1

)

(1

)

(1

)

(3

)

Non-current liabilities

 

(12

)

(11

)

(52

)

(50

)

Net asset (liability) recognized

 

$

(1

)

$

4

 

$

(35

)

$

(27

)

74



Table of Contents

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, excluding tax effects, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 were as follows:

 

71



Table of Contents

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

67

 

$

32

 

$

92

 

$

65

 

 

$

19

 

$

7

 

$

69

 

$

59

 

Prior service cost

 

 

 

 

(1

)

Transition obligation

 

 

 

2

 

3

 

 

 

 

2

 

2

 

Prior service credit

 

(2

)

 

(1

)

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

67

 

$

32

 

$

94

 

$

67

 

 

$

17

 

$

7

 

$

70

 

$

61

 

 

The increase in the net amount recognized in accumulated comprehensive loss at December 31, 20122014, as compared to December 31, 2011,2013, is largely due to a decrease in discount rates used to measure the Company’s obligationobligations under ourits pension plans slightly offset by higher than expected returns on plan assets during 2014 for most plans.

 

The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $548$527 million and $447$493 million at December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2011,2013, respectively.

 

Information about plan obligations and assets for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Projected benefit obligation

 

$

323

 

$

271

 

$

262

 

$

102

 

 

$

9

 

$

10

 

$

54

 

$

52

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

314

 

265

 

227

 

85

 

 

8

 

8

 

43

 

42

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

257

 

222

 

178

 

51

 

 

 

 

2

 

3

 

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost consist of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010:2012:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Service cost

 

$

7

 

$

7

 

$

5

 

$

8

 

$

5

 

$

3

 

 

$

7

 

$

8

 

$

7

 

$

6

 

$

9

 

$

8

 

Interest cost

 

12

 

13

 

7

 

13

 

15

 

10

 

 

13

 

11

 

12

 

14

 

12

 

13

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(16

)

(15

)

(7

)

(13

)

(11

)

(10

)

 

(21

)

(18

)

(16

)

(14

)

(12

)

(13

)

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

1

 

1

 

1

 

4

 

2

 

1

 

 

1

 

2

 

1

 

3

 

5

 

4

 

Amortization of transition obligation

 

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Settlement/Curtailment

 

 

2

 

 

1

 

 

 

Settlement / curtailment

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

4

 

$

8

 

$

6

 

$

14

 

$

12

 

$

4

 

 

$

 

$

3

 

$

4

 

$

9

 

$

14

 

$

14

 

 

For the US plans, the Company estimates that net periodic benefit cost for 20132015 will include approximately $2$1 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2012.2014.

 

For the non-US plans, the Company estimates that net periodic benefit cost for 20132015 will include approximately $5$4 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss and $0.3 million relating to the amortization of the transition obligation included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2012.2014.

 

Actuarial gains and losses in excess of 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan assets are recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the average remaining

75



Table of Contents

service period of a plan’s active employees for active defined benefit pension plans and over the average remaining life of a plan’s active employees for frozen defined benefit pension plans.

 

72



Table of Contents

Total amounts recorded in other comprehensive lossincome and net periodic benefit cost during 20122014 was as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

(in millions, pre-tax)

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

36

 

$

29

 

 

$

13

 

$

19

 

Prior service credit

 

(2

)

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

(1

)

(4

)

 

(1

)

(3

)

Amortization of transition obligation

 

 

(1

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

3

 

 

 

(7

)

Total recorded in other comprehensive loss

 

35

 

27

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive income

 

10

 

9

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

4

 

14

 

 

 

9

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive loss and net periodic benefit cost

 

$

39

 

$

41

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive income and net periodic benefit cost

 

$

10

 

$

18

 

 

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s obligations under the pension plans:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Discount rate

 

3.60

%

4.50

%

4.85

%

5.68

%

 

4.00

%

4.60

%

4.47

%

5.60

%

Rate of compensation increase

 

4.19

%

4.19

%

4.35

%

4.51

%

 

4.31

%

4.22

%

3.76

%

4.39

%

 

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Discount rate

 

4.50

%

5.35

%

5.85

%

5.68

%

5.73

%

7.24

%

 

4.60

%

3.60

%

4.50

%

5.60

%

4.88

%

5.68

%

Expected long-term return on plan assets

 

7.25

%

7.25

%

7.25

%

6.81

%

6.73

%

7.37

%

 

7.25

%

7.25

%

7.25

%

6.82

%

6.69

%

6.81

%

Rate of compensation increase

 

4.19

%

2.75

%

2.75

%

4.51

%

3.79

%

4.12

%

 

4.22

%

4.19

%

4.19

%

4.39

%

4.35

%

4.51

%

 

TheFor 2015 and 2014, the Company has assumed an expected long-term rate of return on assets of 7.00 percent and 7.25 percent for US plans and 6.506.00 percent and 6.45 percent for Canadian plans.plans, respectively.  In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption on plan assets, which consist mainly of US and Canadian equity and debt securities, management evaluated historical rates of return achieved on plan assets and the asset allocation of the plans, input from the Company’s independent actuaries and investment consultants, and historical trends in long-term inflation rates.  Projected return estimates made by such consultants are based upon broad equity and bond indices.

 

The discount rate reflects a rate of return on high qualityhigh-quality fixed income investments that match the duration of the expected benefit payments. The Company has typically used returns on long-term, high qualityhigh-quality corporate AA bonds as a benchmark in establishing this assumption.

 

Plan Assets — The Company’s investment policy for its pension plans is to balance risk and return through diversified portfolios of equity instruments, fixed income securities, and short-term investments. Maturities for fixed income securities are managed such that sufficient liquidity exists to meet near-term benefit payment obligations. For US pension plans, the weighted average target range allocation of assets was 38-72 percent in equities, 31-58 percent in fixed income and 1-3 percent in cash and other short-term investments. The asset allocation is reviewed regularly and portfolio investments are rebalanced to the targeted allocation when considered appropriate.

 

7376



Table of Contents

 

appropriate.  The Company anticipates increasing its target allocation of assets in fixed income portfolios in the future due to the funded nature of the US plans.

The Company’s weighted average asset allocation as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 for US and non-US pension plan assets is as follows:

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

Asset Category

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

Equity securities

 

61

%

53

%

42

%

46

%

 

62

%

62

%

50

%

51

%

Debt securities

 

38

%

45

%

47

%

46

%

 

37

%

36

%

40

%

39

%

Cash and other

 

1

%

2

%

11

%

8

%

 

1

%

2

%

10

%

10

%

Total

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

100

%

100

%

100

%

100

%

 

The fair values of the Company’s plan assets at December 31, 2012,2014, by asset category and level in the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

Asset Category

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012

 

(in millions)

 

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical

Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Total

 

Asset Category
(in millions)

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014

 

Quoted Prices 
in Active 
Markets for 
Identical

Assets
(Level 1)

 

Significant 
Observable 
Inputs

(Level 2)

 

Significant 
Unobservable 
Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Total

 

US Plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity index:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US (a)

 

 

 

$

126

 

 

 

$

126

 

 

 

 

$

158

 

 

 

$

158

 

International (b)

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

27

 

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

30

 

Real estate (c)

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Fixed income index:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intermediate bond (d)

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

61

 

 

 

61

 

Long bond (e)

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

76

 

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

54

 

Cash (f)

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Total US Plans

 

 

 

 

$

257

 

 

 

$

257

 

 

 

 

$

313

 

 

 

$

313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-US Plans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity index:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

US (a)

 

 

 

$

27

 

 

 

$

27

 

 

 

 

$

42

 

 

 

$

42

 

Canada (g)

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

28

 

 

 

 

36

 

 

 

36

 

International (b)

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

Fixed income index:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intermediate bond (d)

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Long bond (h)

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

92

 

Other (i)

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

22

 

Cash (f)

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Total Non-US Plans

 

$

5

 

$

184

 

 

 

$

189

 

 

$

2

 

$

230

 

 

 

$

232

 

 


(a)         This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks the return of large capitalization US equities.

(b)         This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks an index of returns on international developed market equities.

(c)          This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks a US real estate equity securities index that includes equities of real estate investment trusts and real estate operating companies.

(d)         This category consists of a passively managed fixed income index fund that tracks the return of intermediate duration US government and investment grade corporate bonds.

77



Table of Contents

(e)          This category consists of a passively managed fixed income fund that tracks the return of long duration US government and investment grade corporate bonds.

(f)            This category represents cash or cash equivalents.

74



Table of Contents

(g)         This category consists of a passively managed equity index fund that tracks the return of large and mid-sized capitalization equities traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

(h)         This category consists of a passively managed fixed income index fund that tracks the return of the universe of Canada government and investment grade corporate bonds.

(i)            This category mainly consists of an investment productproducts provided by an insurance company that offers returns that are subject to a minimum guarantee.

 

All significant pension plan assets are held in collective trusts by the Company’s US and non-US plans (the “Plan”).plans.  The fair values of shares of collective trusts are based upon the net asset values of the funds reported by the fund managers based on quoted market prices of the underlying securities as of the balance sheet date and are determinedconsidered to be Level 2 fair value measurements.  This may produce a fair value measurement that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.  Furthermore, while the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies could result in different fair value measurements at the reporting date.

 

In 2012,2014, the Company made cash contributions of $23$6 million and $15$11 million to its US and non-US pension plans, respectively.  The Company anticipates that in 20132015 it will make cash contributions of $12$1 million and $14$2 million to its US and non-US pension plans, respectively.  Cash contributions in subsequent years will depend on a number of factors including the performance of plan assets.  The following benefit payments, which reflect anticipated future service, as appropriate, are expected to be made:

 

(in millions)

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

 

US Plans

 

Non-US Plans

 

2013

 

$

19

 

$

13

 

2014

 

17

 

14

 

2015

 

17

 

13

 

 

$

17

 

$

10

 

2016

 

17

 

14

 

 

17

 

14

 

2017

 

20

 

15

 

 

19

 

11

 

Years 2018 - 2022

 

105

 

85

 

2018

 

19

 

12

 

2019

 

19

 

13

 

Years 2020 - 2024

 

107

 

73

 

 

The Company and certain subsidiaries also maintain defined contribution plans. The Company makes matching contributions to these plans that are subject to certain vesting requirements and are based on a percentage of employee contributions. Amounts charged to expense for defined contribution plans totaled $17 million, $15 million and $13 million $12 millionin 2014, 2013 and $8 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

78



Table of Contents

 

Postretirement Benefit Plans — The Company’s postretirement benefit plans currently are not funded. The information presented below includes plans in the United States, Brazil, and Canada. The changes in the benefit obligations of the plans during 20122014 and 2011,2013, and the amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20122014 and 2011,2013, are as follows:

 

75



Table of Contents

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

At January 1

 

$

54

 

$

88

 

Service cost

 

2

 

2

 

Interest cost

 

3

 

4

 

Plan amendment

 

 

(23

)

Curtailment / settlement

 

 

(26

)

Actuarial loss

 

17

 

10

 

Benefits paid

 

(2

)

(3

)

Business combinations / transfers

 

 

4

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

(2

)

At December 31

 

$

74

 

$

54

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

 

Funded status

 

$

(74

)

$

(54

)

A United States hourly postretirement plan became a member of a multi-employer plan and because of this change, a non-cash curtailment gain of $30 million was recognized as a reduction of net periodic benefit cost in 2011.  This curtailment gain represented the previously established liability related to this coverage, net of unrecognized actuarial amounts and prior service previously included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

 

 

 

 

 

At January 1

 

$

57

 

$

74

 

Service cost

 

3

 

3

 

Interest cost

 

4

 

4

 

Curtailment / settlement

 

 

(1

)

Plan amendment

 

(16

)

 

Actuarial (gain) loss

 

4

 

(15

)

Benefits paid

 

(3

)

(3

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(2

)

(5

)

At December 31

 

$

47

 

$

57

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

 

 

Funded status

 

$

(47

)

$

(57

)

 

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet consist of:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Current liabilities

 

$

(2

)

$

(2

)

 

$

(3

)

$

(2

)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(72

)

(52

)

Non-current liabilities

 

(44

)

(55

)

Net liability recognized

 

$

(74

)

$

(54

)

 

$

(47

)

$

(57

)

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, excluding tax effects, that have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 were as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

26

 

$

10

 

Prior service cost

 

1

 

1

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

27

 

$

11

 

76



Table of Contents

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

9

 

$

7

 

Prior service credit

 

(15

)

 

Net amount recognized

 

$

(6

)

$

7

 

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010:2012:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Service cost

 

$

2

 

$

2

 

$

2

 

 

$

3

 

$

3

 

$

2

 

Interest cost

 

3

 

4

 

4

 

 

4

 

4

 

3

 

Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)

 

1

 

(1

)

2

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

1

 

 

Settlement / curtailment

 

 

(31

)

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

 

1

 

1

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

6

 

$

(25

)

$

8

 

 

$

7

 

$

8

 

$

6

 

 

The Company estimates that postretirement benefit expense for 20132015 will include approximately $1$0.5 million relating to the amortization of its accumulated actuarial loss and $0.2$2.2 million relating to the amortization of its prior service costcredit included in accumulated other comprehensive lossincome at December 31, 2012.2014.

79



Table of Contents

 

Total amounts recorded in other comprehensive lossincome and net periodic benefit cost during 20122014 was as follows:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

17

 

Amortization of actuarial loss

 

(1

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive loss

 

16

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

6

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive loss and net periodic benefit cost

 

$

22

 

(in millions, pre-tax)

 

2014

 

Net actuarial loss

 

$

2

 

New prior service credit

 

(15

)

Total recorded in other comprehensive income

 

(13

)

Net periodic benefit cost

 

7

 

Total recorded in other comprehensive income and net periodic benefit cost

 

$

(6

)

 

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s obligations under the postretirement plans:

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Discount rate

 

5.44

%

6.23

%

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Discount rate

 

5.70

%

6.47

%

 

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s net postretirement benefit cost:

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Discount rate

 

6.23

%

5.69

%

6.22

%

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Discount rate

 

6.47

%

5.44

%

6.23

%

 

The discount rate reflects a rate of return on high quality fixed incomehigh-quality fixed-income investments that match the duration of expected benefit payments. The Company has typically used returns on long-term, high-quality corporate AA bonds as a benchmark in establishing this assumption.

 

The health-carehealthcare cost trend rates used in valuing the Company’s post-retirementpostretirement benefit obligations are established based upon actual health-carehealthcare trends and consultation with actuaries and benefit providers.  The following assumptions were used as of December 31, 2012:2014:

 

77



Table of Contents

 

US

 

Canada

 

Brazil

 

 

US

 

Canada

 

Brazil

 

2013 Increase in per capita cost

 

7.10

%

7.35

%

7.74

%

2015 increase in per capita cost

 

6.70

%

7.05

%

8.66

%

Ultimate trend

 

4.50

%

4.50

%

7.74

%

 

4.50

%

4.50

%

8.66

%

Year ultimate trend reached

 

2028

 

2031

 

2012

 

 

2027

 

2031

 

2014

 

 

The sensitivities of service cost and interest cost and year-end benefit obligations to changes in health carehealthcare cost trend rates for the postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 20122014 are as follows:

 

 

 

20122014

 

One-percentage point increase in trend rates:

 

 

 

·Increase in service cost and interest cost components

 

$

1 million

 

·Increase in year-end benefit obligations

 

$11

4 million

 

 

 

 

 

One-percentage point decrease in trend rates:

 

 

 

·Decrease in service cost and interest cost components

 

$(

1 million)million

 

·   Decrease in year-end benefit obligations

 

$(9 million)

3 million

 

80



Table of Contents

 

The following benefit payments, which reflect anticipated future service, as appropriate, are expected to be made under the Company’s postretirement benefit plans:

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

2013

 

$

2

 

2014

 

2

 

2015

 

3

 

2016

 

3

 

2017

 

3

 

Years 2018 - 2022

 

$

20

 

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 provides a federal subsidy to employers sponsoring retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. The Company receives a Medicare Part D subsidy for certain retirees.  The impact of the Medicare Part D subsidy is not significant.

(in millions)

 

 

 

2015

 

$

3

 

2016

 

3

 

2017

 

3

 

2018

 

3

 

2019

 

3

 

Years 2020 - 2024

 

$

16

 

 

Multiemployer Plans — The Company participates in and contributes to one multiemployer benefit plan under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement that covercovers certain union-represented employees and retirees in the US.  The plan covers medical and dental benefits for active hourly employees and retirees represented by the United States Steel Workers Union for certain US locations.

 

The risks of participating in this multiemployer plan are different from single-employer plans.  This plan receives contributions from two or more unrelated employers pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements and the assets contributed by one employer may be used to fund the benefits of all employees covered within the plan.

 

The Company is required to make contributions to this plan as determined by the terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreements and plan terms. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, the Company made regular contributions of $12 million $9 million and $2 million, respectively,in each year to this multi-employer

78



Table of Contents

plan.  Increases in regular contributions were due to one additional Company location becoming a member of the multi-employer plan as discussed above and due to partial year contributions reflected in certain locations 2010 due to the National Starch acquisition.  The Company cannot currently estimate the amount of multi-employermultiemployer plan contributions that will be required in 20132015 and future years, but these contributions could increase due to healthcare cost trends.

 

7981



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 10 — Supplementary Information

 

Balance Sheets

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Accounts receivable — net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable — trade

 

$

707

 

$

683

 

 

$

655

 

$

667

 

Accounts receivable — other

 

117

 

165

 

 

111

 

171

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(10

)

(11

)

 

(4

)

(6

)

Total accounts receivable — net

 

$

814

 

$

837

 

 

$

762

 

$

832

 

Inventories:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finished and in process

 

$

475

 

$

436

 

 

$

428

 

$

440

 

Raw materials

 

313

 

294

 

 

225

 

235

 

Manufacturing supplies

 

46

 

39

 

 

46

 

48

 

Total inventories

 

$

834

 

$

769

 

 

$

699

 

$

723

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation expenses

 

$

90

 

$

85

 

Compensation-related costs

 

$

74

 

$

75

 

Income taxes payable

 

25

 

36

 

 

36

 

14

 

Dividends payable

 

20

 

15

 

 

31

 

32

 

Accrued interest

 

16

 

15

 

 

16

 

16

 

Taxes payable other than income taxes

 

33

 

31

 

 

36

 

32

 

Other

 

81

 

67

 

 

75

 

100

 

Total accrued liabilities

 

$

265

 

$

249

 

 

$

268

 

$

269

 

Non-current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employees’ pension, indemnity and retirement

 

$

235

 

$

180

 

Employees’ pension, indemnity and postretirement

 

$

126

 

$

133

 

Other

 

62

 

63

 

 

31

 

30

 

Total non-current liabilities

 

$

297

 

$

243

 

 

$

157

 

$

163

 

 

Statements of Income

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Other income - net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain from change in benefit plan in North America

 

$

5

 

$

 

$

 

Gain from sale of land

 

2

 

 

 

NAFTA award

 

 

58

 

 

Gain from change in a postretirement plan

 

 

30

 

 

Gain on investment

 

 

 

2

 

Other

 

15

 

10

 

8

 

Other income - net

 

$

22

 

$

98

 

$

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs-net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (a) 

 

$

77

 

$

81

 

$

68

 

Interest income

 

(10

)

(5

)

(6

)

Foreign currency transaction losses

 

 

2

 

2

 

Financing costs-net

 

$

67

 

$

78

 

$

64

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Other income - net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax indemnification income (a) 

 

$

7

 

$

 

$

 

Gain from sale of investment

 

5

 

 

 

Gain from sale of idled plant and land

 

3

 

 

2

 

Gain from change in benefit plan in North America

 

 

 

5

 

Other

 

9

 

16

 

15

 

Other income - net

 

$

24

 

$

16

 

$

22

 


(a)  Amount fully offset by $7 million of expense recorded in the income tax provision.

Financing costs-net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (a)

 

$

73

 

$

74

 

$

77

 

Interest income

 

(13

)

(11

)

(10

)

Foreign currency transaction losses

 

1

 

3

 

 

Financing costs-net

 

$

61

 

$

66

 

$

67

 

 


(a) Interest capitalized amounted to $2 million, $4 million and $6 million $5 millionin 2014, 2013 and $3 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

8082



Table of Contents

 

Statements of Cash Flow:

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Interest paid

 

$

72

 

$

85

 

$

50

 

Income taxes paid

 

133

 

177

 

98

 

Noncash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assumption of debt in connection with acquisition

 

 

 

11

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Other non-cash charges to net income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mechanical stores expense (a)

 

$

56

 

$

48

 

$

42

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

19

 

17

 

18

 

Other

 

(7

)

9

 

(5

)

Total other non-cash charges to net income

 

$

68

 

$

74

 

$

55

 

 


Natural Gas Purchase Agreement:(a) Represents spare parts used in the production process.  Such spare parts are recorded in PP&E as part of machinery and equipment until they are utilized in the manufacturing process and expensed as a period cost.

 

On January 20, 2006, Ingredion Brasil Ingredientes Industriais Ltda. (“Ingredion Brazil”), the Company’s wholly-owned Brazilian subsidiary entered into a Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Companhia de Gas de Sao Paulo — Comgas (“Comgas”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Comgas supplies natural gas to the cogeneration facility at Ingredion Brazil’s Mogi Guacu plant.  This agreement will expire on March 31, 2023, unless extended or terminated under certain conditions specified in the Agreement.  During the term of the Agreement, Ingredion Brazil is obligated to purchase from Comgas, and Comgas is obligated to provide to Ingredion Brazil, certain minimum quantities of natural gas that are specified in the Agreement.  The price for such quantities of natural gas is determined pursuant to a formula set forth in the Agreement.  The price may vary based upon: gas commodity costs and transportation costs, which are adjusted annually; the distribution margin which is set by the Brazilian Commission of Public Energy Services; and the fluctuation of exchange rates between the US dollar and the Brazilian real.  The Company estimates that the total minimum expenditures by Ingredion Brazil through the remaining term of the Agreement will be approximately $195 million based on current exchange rates as of December 31, 2012 and estimates regarding the application of the formula set forth in the Agreement, spread evenly over the remaining term of the Agreement.  Ingredion Brazil will make payments of approximately $19 million in each of the next five years in accordance with the Agreement.  The amount of gas purchased under this Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $25 million, $26 million and $24 million, respectively.

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Interest paid

 

$

59

 

$

61

 

$

65

 

Income taxes paid

 

94

 

135

 

133

 

 

NOTE 11 — Redeemable Common Stock

The Company had an agreement with certain common stockholders (collectively the “holder”), relating to 500,000 shares of our common stock, that provided the holder with the right to require us to repurchase those common shares for cash at a price equal to the average of the closing per share market price of our common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date that the holder exercised the put option.  This put option was exercisable at any time, until January 2010, when it expired.  The shares associated with the put option were classified as redeemable common stock in our consolidated balance sheet prior to the expiration of the put option.  The carrying value of the redeemable common stock was $14 million at December 31, 2009 based on the average of the closing per share market price of the Company’s common stock for the 20 trading days immediately preceding December 31, 2009 ($29.03 per share).  Effective with the expiration of the agreement, the Company discontinued reporting the shares as redeemable common stock and reclassified the $14 million from redeemable common stock to additional paid-in capital.

81



Table of Contents

NOTE 12 - Equity

 

Preferred stock:

 

The Company has authorized 25 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock, none of which were issued or outstanding as ofat December 31, 20122014 and 2011.2013.

 

Treasury stock:

 

The Company reacquired 44,674, 73,260 and 51,999 shares of its common stock during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, by both repurchasing shares from employees under the stock incentive plan and through the cancellation of forfeited restricted stock.  The Company repurchased shares from employees at average purchase prices of $58.59, $47.48 and $33.53, or fair value at the date of purchase, during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  All of the acquired shares are held as common stock in treasury, less shares issued to employees under the stock incentive plan.

On November 17, 2010,December 12, 2014, the Board of Directors authorized an extension of the Company’sa new stock repurchase program permitting the Company to purchase up to 5 million of its outstanding common shares from January 1, 2015 through November 30, 2015.December 12, 2019.  The Company’s previously authorized stock repurchase program was authorized bypermitting the Boardpurchase of Directors on November 7, 2007 and would have expired on November 30, 2010.  In 2012, the Company repurchased 300,000 commonup to 4 million shares in open market transactions at a cost of approximately $15 million.  In 2011, the Company repurchased 1,000,000 common shares in open market transactions at a cost of approximately $45 million.  In 2010, the Company repurchased 100,000 common shares in open market transactions at a cost of approximately $4 million.  At December 31, 2012, the Company had 3,385,382has been almost fully utilized with 176 thousand shares available to be repurchased under its program.at December 31, 2014.  The parameters of the Company’s stock repurchase program are not established solely with reference to the dilutive impact of shares issued under the Company’s stock incentive plan.  However, the Company expects that, over time, share repurchases will offset the dilutive impact of shares issued under the stock incentive plan.

 

As part of the previous stock repurchase program, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) on July 30, 2014 with an investment bank under which the Company repurchased $300 million of its common stock.  The Company paid the $300 million on August 1, 2014 and received an initial delivery of shares from the investment bank of 3,152,502 shares, representing approximately 80 percent of the shares anticipated to be repurchased based on current market prices at that time. The ASR was initially accounted for as an initial stock purchase transaction and a forward stock purchase contract.  The initial delivery of shares resulted in an immediate reduction in the number of shares used to calculate the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic and diluted net earnings per share from the effective date of the ASR.  On December 29, 2014, the ASR was completed and the Company received 671,823 additional shares of its common stock bringing the total amount of repurchases to 3,824,325 shares, based upon the volume-weighted average price of $78.45 per share over the term of the share repurchase agreement.  The ASR was funded through a combination of cash on hand and utilization of the Revolving Credit Agreement.

In 2013, the Company repurchased 3,385,000 common shares in open market transactions at a cost of approximately $227 million.  In 2012, the Company repurchased 300,000 common shares in open market transactions at a cost of approximately $15 million.

The Company also reacquired 8,738, 21,629 and 44,674 shares of its common stock during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, by both repurchasing shares from employees under the stock incentive plan and through the cancellation of forfeited restricted stock.  The Company repurchased shares from employees at average purchase prices of $61.05, $44.55 and $58.59, or fair value at the date of purchase, during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  All of the acquired shares are held as common stock in treasury, less shares issued to employees under the stock incentive plan.

8283



Table of Contents

 

Set forth below is a reconciliation of common stock share activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20112012, 2013 and 2012:2014:

 

(Shares of common stock, in thousands)

 

Issued

 

Held in Treasury

 

Redeemable Shares

 

Outstanding

 

 

Issued

 

Held in Treasury

 

Outstanding

 

Balance at December 31, 2009

 

75,320

 

434

 

500

 

74,386

 

Issuance of restricted stock as compensation

 

66

 

(19

)

 

85

 

Issuance under incentive and other plans

 

42

 

(2

)

 

44

 

Stock options exercised

 

607

 

(552

)

 

1,159

 

Purchase/acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

151

 

 

(151

)

Expiration of put option (see Note 11)

 

 

 

(500

)

500

 

Balance at December 31, 2010

 

76,035

 

12

 

 

76,023

 

Issuance of restricted stock units as compensation

 

56

 

 

 

56

 

Issuance under incentive and other plans

 

91

 

(9

)

 

100

 

Stock options exercised

 

640

 

(137

)

 

777

 

Purchase/acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

1,073

 

 

(1,073

)

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

76,822

 

939

 

 

75,883

 

 

76,822

 

939

 

75,883

 

Issuance of restricted stock units as compensation

 

 

(6

)

 

6

 

 

 

(6

)

6

 

Issuance under incentive and other plans

 

 

(142

)

 

142

 

 

 

(142

)

142

 

Stock options exercised

 

320

 

(993

)

 

1,313

 

 

320

 

(1,026

)

1,346

 

Purchase/acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

312

 

 

(312

)

 

 

345

 

(345

)

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

77,142

 

110

 

 

77,032

 

 

77,142

 

110

 

77,032

 

Issuance of restricted stock units as compensation

 

6

 

(3

)

9

 

Issuance under incentive and other plans

 

130

 

(43

)

173

 

Stock options exercised

 

395

 

(110

)

505

 

Purchase/acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

3,407

 

(3,407

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

77,673

 

3,361

 

74,312

 

Issuance of restricted stock units as compensation

 

89

 

(24

)

113

 

Issuance under incentive and other plans

 

49

 

(63

)

112

 

Stock options exercised

 

 

(618

)

618

 

Purchase/acquisition of treasury stock

 

 

3,833

 

(3,833

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

77,811

 

6,489

 

71,322

 

 

Share-based payments:

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s share-based compensation expense for the last three years:

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Stock options:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-tax compensation expense

 

$

7

 

$

6

 

$

7

 

Income tax (benefit)

 

(3

)

(2

)

(3

)

Stock option expense, net of income taxes

 

4

 

4

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSUs and RSAs:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-tax compensation expense

 

8

 

7

 

6

 

Income tax (benefit)

 

(3

)

(3

)

(2

)

RSU and RSA compensation expense, net of income taxes

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance shares and other share-based awards:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-tax compensation expense

 

4

 

4

 

5

 

Income tax (benefit)

 

(1

)

(1

)

(2

)

Performance shares and other share-based

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

compensation expense, net of income taxes

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total share-based compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-tax compensation expense

 

19

 

17

 

18

 

Income tax (benefit)

 

(7

)

(6

)

(7

)

Total share-based compensation expense, net of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

income taxes

 

$

12

 

$

11

 

$

11

 

 

The Company has a stock incentive plan (“SIP”) administered by the compensation committee of its Board of Directors that provides for the granting of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-basedshare-based awards to certain key employees.  A maximum of 8 million shares were originally authorized for awards under the SIP.  As of

84



Table of Contents

December 31, 2012, 3.72014, 6.0 million shares were available for future grants under the SIP.  Shares covered by awards that expire, terminate or lapse will again be available for the grant of awards under the SIP. Total share-based compensation expense for 2012 was $12 million, net of income tax effect of $5 million.  Total share-based compensation expense for 2011 was $11 million, net of income tax effect of $5 million.  Total share-based compensation expense for 2010 was $8 million, net of income tax effect of $4 million.

 

The Company grants nonqualified options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock.  The stock options have a ten-year life and are exercisable upon vesting, which occurs evenly over a three-year period at the anniversary dates of the date of grant.  Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis for awards.  As of December 31, 2012,2014, certain of these nonqualified options have been forfeited due to the termination of employees.

 

The fair value of stock option awards was estimated at the grant dates using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Expected life (in years)

 

5.8

 

5.8

 

5.8

 

 

5.5

 

5.8

 

5.8

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

1.1

%

2.8

%

2.7

%

 

1.6

%

1.1

%

1.1

%

Expected volatility

 

33.3

%

32.7

%

33.1

%

 

30.3

%

32.6

%

33.3

%

Expected dividend yield

 

1.2

%

1.2

%

1.9

%

 

2.8

%

1.6

%

1.2

%

 

The expected life of options represents the weighted-average period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules and the Company’s historical exercise patterns.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the US Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the options.  Expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock.  Dividend yields are based on historical dividend payments. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012 was estimated to be $12.99, $17.87 and $16.16, $15.17 and $8.41, respectively.

83



Table of Contents

 

A summary of stock option transactions for the last three years follows:

 

(shares in thousands)

 

Stock Option
Shares

 

Stock Option
Price Range

 

Weighted
Average
per Share
Exercise Price
for Stock
Options

 

 

Stock Option
Shares

 

Stock Option
Price Range

 

Weighted
Average
per Share
Exercise Price
for Stock
Options

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2009

 

4,842

 

$ 11.37 to $40.71

 

$

 25.32

 

Granted

 

828

 

28.75 to 33.63

 

28.95

 

Exercised

 

(1,158

)

11.37 to 34.93

 

19.29

 

Cancelled

 

(78

)

25.58 to 34.36

 

29.68

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

 

4,434

 

14.17 to 40.71

 

27.49

 

Granted

 

438

 

47.95 to 52.64

 

47.96

 

Exercised

 

(777

)

14.17 to 40.71

 

24.24

 

Cancelled

 

(65

)

18.31 to 47.95

 

30.60

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2011

 

4,030

 

14.33 to 52.64

 

 

30.29

 

 

4,030

 

$14.33 to 52.64

 

$

30.29

 

Granted

 

460

 

55.95 to 57.33

 

55.96

 

 

460

 

55.95 to 57.33

 

55.96

 

Exercised

 

(1,409

)

14.33 to 47.95

 

26.80

 

 

(1,409

)

14.33 to 47.95

 

26.80

 

Cancelled

 

(49

)

25.58 to 55.95

 

39.29

 

 

(49

)

25.58 to 55.95

 

39.29

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

 

3,032

 

16.92 to 57.33

 

35.66

 

 

3,032

 

16.92 to 57.33

 

35.66

 

Granted

 

416

 

66.07 to 66.26

 

66.07

 

Exercised

 

(511

)

16.92 to 57.33

 

28.74

 

Cancelled

 

(88

)

47.95 to 66.07

 

54.37

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

 

2,849

 

24.70 to 66.26

 

40.77

 

Granted

 

715

 

59.58 to 69.14

 

59.65

 

Exercised

 

(618

)

24.70 to 66.07

 

33.25

 

Cancelled

 

(57

)

24.70 to 66.07

 

51.54

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

 

2,889

 

25.83 to 69.14

 

46.84

 

 

The intrinsic values of stock options exercised during 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012 were approximately $46$26 million, $22$20 million and $22$46 million, respectively.  For the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, cash received from the exercise of stock options was $34$20 million, $18$14 million and $22$34 million, respectively.  The excess income tax benefit realized from share-based compensation was $6 million, $5 million and $11 million $6 millionin 2014, 2013 and $6 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  As of December 31, 2012,2014, the unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options totaled $8$9 million, which willis expected to be amortized over the weighted-average period of approximately one year.1.8 years.

85



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2012:2014:

 

(options in thousands)
Range of Exercise Prices

 

Options
Outstanding

 

Weighted Average Exercise
Price per Share

 

Average Remaining
Contractual Life (Years)

 

Options
Exercisable

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$16.92 to 17.20

 

87

 

$

16.92

 

0.8

 

87

 

$

16.92

 

$22.93 to 28.67

 

723

 

25.47

 

4.1

 

723

 

25.47

 

$28.68 to 34.40

 

1,368

 

31.94

 

5.7

 

1,150

 

32.50

 

$45.86 to 51.60

 

403

 

47.95

 

8.1

 

131

 

47.95

 

$51.61 to 57.33

 

451

 

55.95

 

9.1

 

 

52.64

 

 

 

3,032

 

$

35.66

 

6.0

 

2,091

 

$

30.39

 

(options in thousands)

Range of Exercise Prices

 

Options
Outstanding

 

Weighted Average Exercise
Price per Share

 

Average Remaining
Contractual Life (Years)

 

Options
Exercisable

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$24.70 to 27.30

 

334

 

$

25.68

 

2.89

 

334

 

$

25.68

 

$27.31 to 29.90

 

369

 

29.06

 

5.07

 

369

 

29.06

 

$32.51 to 35.10

 

472

 

34.06

 

2.79

 

472

 

34.07

 

$45.51 to 53.30

 

281

 

47.95

 

6.11

 

281

 

47.95

 

$55.91 to 58.50

 

369

 

55.95

 

7.11

 

253

 

55.95

 

$58.51 to 61.10

 

695

 

59.58

 

9.10

 

 

 

$63.71 to 66.26

 

364

 

66.07

 

8.10

 

131

 

66.07

 

$68.91 to 71.50

 

5

 

69.14

 

9.34

 

 

 

 

 

2,889

 

$

46.84

 

6.17

 

1,840

 

$

38.95

 

 

Stock options outstanding at December 31, 20122014 had an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $87$110 million and an average remaining contractual life of 6.06.2 years.  Stock options exercisable at December 31, 20122014 had an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $71$85 million and an average remaining contractual life of 4.94.7 years.  Stock options outstanding at December 31, 20112013 had an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $90$79 million and an average remaining contractual life of 6.05.8 years.  Stock options exercisable at December 31, 20112013 had an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $70$72 million and an average remaining contractual life of 5.14.8 years.

84



Table of Contents

 

In addition to stock options, the Company awards shares of restricted common stock (“restricted shares”) and restricted stock units (“restricted units”) to certain key employees.  The restricted shares and restricted units issued under the plan are subject to cliff vesting, generally after three to five years provided the employee remains in the service of the Company.  Expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period taking into account an estimated forfeiture rate.  The fair value of the restricted stock and restricted units is determined based upon the number of shares granted and the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant.  The compensation expense recognized for restricted stock and restricted stock units was $6 million in 2012, $4 million in 2011 and $3 million in 2010.

 

The following table summarizes restricted stockshare and restricted stock unit activity for the last three years:

 

(shares in thousands)

 

Number of
Restricted
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per Share

 

Number of
Restricted
Units

 

Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per Share

 

 

Number of
Restricted
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per Share

 

Number of
Restricted
Units

 

Weighted
Average
Fair Value
per Share

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2009

 

235

 

$

29.60

 

146

 

$

27.17

 

Granted

 

30

 

30.86

 

25

 

40.82

 

Vested

 

(76

)

28.90

 

(56

)

25.81

 

Cancelled

 

(8

)

30.78

 

(2

)

45.21

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2010

 

181

 

$

30.04

 

113

 

$

30.56

 

Granted

 

 

 

182

 

48.04

 

Vested

 

(34

)

27.56

 

(56

)

26.08

 

Cancelled

 

(11

)

29.74

 

(4

)

47.98

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2011

 

136

 

$

30.69

 

235

 

$

44.24

 

 

136

 

$

30.69

 

235

 

$

44.24

 

Granted

 

 

 

174

 

55.69

 

 

 

 

174

 

55.69

 

Vested

 

(37

)

33.73

 

(9

)

37.57

 

 

(37

)

33.73

 

(9

)

37.57

 

Cancelled

 

(4

)

25.58

 

(15

)

44.95

 

 

(4

)

25.58

 

(15

)

44.95

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

 

95

 

$

29.69

 

385

 

$

49.77

 

 

95

 

$

29.69

 

385

 

$

49.77

 

Granted

 

 

 

144

 

66.27

 

Vested

 

(33

)

34.02

 

(17

)

46.82

 

Cancelled

 

(14

)

31.25

 

(43

)

54.93

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2013

 

48

 

$

26.25

 

469

 

$

54.47

 

Granted

 

 

 

161

 

61.50

 

Vested

 

(31

)

25.35

 

(168

)

48.16

 

Cancelled

 

(1

)

28.75

 

(28

)

53.27

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2014

 

16

 

$

27.94

 

434

 

$

59.61

 

 

The total fair value of restricted stockunits that vested in 2014, 2013 and 2012 2011 and 2010 was $1$8 million, $1 million and $2$0.3 million, respectively.  TheRestricted shares with a total fair value of restricted stock units that$1 million vested in 2012, 2011each of 2014, 2013 and 2010 was $0.3 million, $1 million and $1 million, respectively.2012.

86



Table of Contents

 

At December 31, 2012, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock that will be amortized on a weighted-average basis over 1.0 years.  At December 31, 2012,2014, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted units was $10$11 million which will be amortized on a weighted-average basis over approximately 1.81.9 years.  The recognizedUnrecognized compensation cost related to restricted shares was insignificant at December 31, 2014.  Recognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted share and restricted stock units totaling $11 million at December 31, 2012unit awards is included in share-based payments subject to redemption in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets and totaled $16 million and $17 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

Other share-based awards under the SIP:

 

Under the compensation agreement with the Board of Directors at least 50 percent of a director’s compensation is awarded in shares of common stock or restricted units based on each director’s election to receive suchhis or her compensation or a portion thereof in the form of restricted stockunits.  These restricted units vest immediately, but cannot be transferred until a date not less than six months after the director’s termination of service from the board at which have investment returns equal to changes in valuetime the restricted units will be settled by delivering shares of the Company’s common stock with dividends being reinvested.  Stock units under this plan vest immediately.stock.  The compensation expense relating to this plan included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for 2012, 2011 and 2010 wasdid not material.exceed $1 million in 2014, 2013 or 2012.  At December 31, 2012,2014, there were approximately 238,000 share183,000 restricted units outstanding under this plan at a carrying value of approximately $7 million.

 

The Company has a long-term incentive plan for officers in the form of performance shares.  The ultimate paymentpayments for performance shares awarded in 2010, 20112012, 2013 and 20122014 to be paid in 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 2015 are2017 will be based solely on the Company’s stock performance as compared to the stock performance of a peer group.  Compensation expense is based on the fair value of the performance shares at the grant date, established using a Monte Carlo simulation model.  The total compensation expense for these awards is amortized over a three-year service period.  Compensation expense relating to these awards included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $4 million, $6 million and $3 million, respectively.  As of December 31, 2012,2014, the unrecognized compensation cost relating to these plans was $4

85



Table of Contents

$3 million, which will be amortized over the remaining requisite service periods of 1 to 2 years.  The recognizedRecognized compensation cost related to these unvested awards totaling $8 million at December 31, 2012 is included in share-based payments subject to redemption in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Sheets and totaled $6 million and $7 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

87



Table of Contents

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

 

A summary of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20112012, 2013 and 20122014 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Currency

 

Gain/(Loss)

 

Pension

 

Gain (Loss)

 

Other

 

 

 

Translation

 

on Hedging

 

Liability

 

on

 

Comprehensive

 

(in millions)

 

Adjustment

 

Activities

 

Adjustment

 

Investment

 

Income/(Loss)

 

Balance, December 31, 2009

 

$

(228

)

$

(33

)

$

(45

)

$

(2

)

$

(308

)

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

Amount of losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $34

 

 

 

54

 

 

 

 

 

54

 

Actuarial loss on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax of $4

 

 

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

(7

)

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $2

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

48

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

 

$

(180

)

$

41

 

$

(49

)

$

(2

)

$

(190

)

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $19

 

 

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

29

 

Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $61

 

 

 

(105

)

 

 

 

 

(105

)

Actuarial loss on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax of $4

 

 

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

(10

)

Gains related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $5

 

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

 

(11

)

Currency translation adjustment

 

(126

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(126

)

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

(306

)

$

(35

)

$

(70

)

$

(2

)

$

(413

)

Gains on cash flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $25

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

Amount of gains on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $15

 

 

 

(25

)

 

 

 

 

(25

)

Actuarial loss on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $27

 

 

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(56

)

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $2

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

(335

)

$

(17

)

$

(121

)

$

(2

)

$

(475

)

(in millions)

 

Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment

 

Deferred
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedging
Activities

 

Pension/
Postretirement
Adjustment

 

Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)
on
Investment

 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

(306

)

$

(35

)

$

(70

)

$

(2

)

$

(413

)

Gains on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $25

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

Amount of gains on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $15

 

 

 

(25

)

 

 

 

 

(25

)

Actuarial losses on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $27

 

 

 

 

 

(56

)

 

 

(56

)

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $2

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(29

)

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

(335

)

$

(17

)

$

(121

)

$

(2

)

$

(475

)

Losses on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $29

 

 

 

(64

)

 

 

 

 

(64

)

Amount of losses on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $19

 

 

 

41

 

 

 

 

 

41

 

Actuarial gains on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $32

 

 

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

63

 

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax of $3

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Unrealized gain on investment, net of income tax effect

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(154

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(154

)

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

(489

)

$

(40

)

$

(53

)

$

(1

)

$

(583

)

Losses on cash-flow hedges, net of income tax effect of $12

 

 

 

(29

)

 

 

 

 

(29

)

Amount of losses on cash-flow hedges reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $23

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

Actuarial losses on pension and other postretirement obligations, settlements and plan amendments, net of income tax effect of $5

 

 

 

 

 

(12

)

 

 

(12

)

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations reclassified to earnings, net of income tax effect of $1

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Currency translation adjustment

 

(212

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(212

)

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

(701

)

$

(19

)

$

(61

)

$

(1

)

$

(782

)

 

NOTE 13 — Mexican Tax on Beverages Sweetened with HFCSThe following table provides detail pertaining to reclassifications from AOCI into net income for the periods presented:

 

Details about AOCI Components

 

Amount Reclassified from AOCI

 

Affected Line Item in
Consolidated Statements
of Income

 

(in millions)

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

Gains (losses) on cash-flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commodity and foreign currency contracts

 

$

(70

)

$

(57

)

$

43

 

Cost of sales

 

Interest rate contracts

 

(3

)

(3

)

(3

)

Financing costs, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Losses related to pension and other postretirement obligations

 

(5

)

(8

)

(7

)

 

(a)

Total before tax reclassifications

 

$

(78

)

$

(68

)

$

33

 

 

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

24

 

22

 

(13

)

 

 

Total after-tax reclassifications

 

$

(54

)

$

(46

)

$

20

 

 

 

On January 1, 2002, a discriminatory tax


(a) This component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and affects both cost of sales and SG&A expenses on beverages sweetened with high fructose corn syrup (“HFCS”) approved by the Mexican Congress late in 2001, became effective.  In response to the enactmentConsolidated Statements of the tax, which at the time effectively ended the use of HFCS for beverages in Mexico, the Company ceased production of HFCS 55 at its San Juan del Rio plant, one of its three plants in Mexico.  Over time, the Company resumed production and sales of HFCS and by 2006 had returned to levels attained prior to the imposition of the tax as a result of certain customers having obtained court rulings exempting them from paying the tax.  The Mexican Congress repealed this tax effective January 1, 2007.

On October 21, 2003, the Company submitted, on its own behalf and on behalf of its Mexican affiliate, CPIngredientes, S.A. de C.V. (previously known as Compania Proveedora de Ingredientes), a Request for Institution of Arbitration Proceedings Submitted Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) (the “Request”). The Request was submitted to the Additional Office of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and was brought against the United Mexican States.  In the Request, the Company asserted that the imposition by Mexico of a discriminatory tax on beverages containing HFCS in force from 2002 through 2006 breached various obligations of Mexico under the investment protection provisions of NAFTA.  The case was bifurcated into two phases, liability and damages, and a hearing on liability was held before a Tribunal in July 2006.  In a Decision dated January 15, 2008, the Tribunal unanimously held that Mexico had violated NAFTA Article 1102, National Treatment, by treating beverages sweetened with HFCS produced by foreign companies differently than those sweetened with domestic sugar.  In JulyIncome.

 

8688



Table of Contents

 

2008, a hearing regarding

The following table provides the quantumcomputation of damages was held beforebasic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) for the same Tribunal.  The Company sought damages and pre- and post-judgment interest totaling $288 million through December 31, 2008.periods presented.

 

In an award rendered August 18, 2009, the Tribunal awarded damages to CPIngredientes in the amount of $58.4 million, as a result of the tax and certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred by CPIngredientes, together with accrued interest.  On October 1, 2009, the Company submitted to the Tribunal a request for correction of this award to avoid effective double taxation on the amount of the award in Mexico.

On March 26, 2010, the Tribunal issued a correction of its August 18, 2009 damages award.  While the amount of damages had not changed, the decision made the damages payable to Ingredion Incorporated (formerly Corn Products International, Inc.) instead of CPIngredientes.

On January 24 and 25, 2011, the Company received cash payments totaling $58.4 million from the Government of the United Mexican States pursuant to the corrected award.  Mexico made these payments pursuant to an agreement with Ingredion Incorporated that provides for terminating pending post-award litigation and waiving post-award interest.  The $58.4 million award is included in other income in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income for 2011.

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Available

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Available

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

to Ingredion

 

Average Shares

 

Per Share

 

to Ingredion

 

Average Shares

 

Per Share

 

to Ingredion

 

Average Shares

 

Per Share

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

(Numerator)

 

(Denominator)

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic EPS

 

$

354.9

 

73.6

 

$

4.82

 

$

395.7

 

77.0

 

$

5.14

 

$

427.5

 

76.5

 

$

5.59

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of Dilutive Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incremental shares from assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and vesting of dilutive RSUs, RSAs and other awards

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted EPS

 

$

354.9

 

74.9

 

$

4.74 

 

$

395.7

 

78.3

 

$

5.05

 

$

427.5 

 

78.2

 

$

5.47

 

 

NOTE 1412 - Segment Information

 

The Company is principally engaged in the production and sale of starches and sweeteners for a wide range of industries, and is managed geographically on a regional basis.  The Company’s operations are classified into four reportable business segments: North America, South America, Asia Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”).  Its North America segment includes businesses in the United States, Canada and Mexico.  The Company’s South America segment includes businesses in Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador Peru and the Southern Cone of South America, which includes Argentina, Chile, Peru and Uruguay.  Its Asia Pacific segment includes businesses in Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, China, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore, India, Australia and New Zealand.  The Company’s EMEA segment includes businesses in the United Kingdom, Germany, South Africa, Pakistan and Kenya.

 

8789



Table of Contents

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net sales to unaffiliated customers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

3,741

 

$

3,356

 

$

2,439

 

 

$

3,093

 

$

3,647

 

$

3,741

 

South America

 

1,462

 

1,569

 

1,241

 

 

1,203

 

1,334

 

1,462

 

Asia Pacific

 

816

 

764

 

433

 

 

794

 

805

 

816

 

EMEA

 

513

 

530

 

254

 

 

578

 

542

 

513

 

Total

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

$

4,367

 

 

$

5,668

 

$

6,328

 

$

6,532

 

Operating income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

408

 

$

322

 

$

249

 

 

$

375

 

$

401

 

$

408

 

South America

 

198

 

203

 

163

 

 

108

 

116

 

198

 

Asia Pacific

 

95

 

79

 

28

 

 

103

 

97

 

95

 

EMEA

 

78

 

84

 

37

 

EMEA (a)

 

95

 

74

 

78

 

Corporate(b)

 

(78

)

(64

)

(51

)

 

(65

)

(75

)

(78

)

Subtotal

 

701

 

624

 

426

 

 

616

 

613

 

701

 

Restructuring / impairment charges (a)

 

(36

)

(10

)

(25

)

Impairment / restructuring charges (c)

 

(33

)

 

(36

)

Acquisition / integration costs

 

(2

)

 

(4

)

Gain from change in benefit plans

 

5

 

30

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

Integration / acquisition costs

 

(4

)

(31

)

(35

)

Gain from land sale

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

NAFTA award

 

 

58

 

 

Charge for fair value mark-up of acquired inventory

 

 

 

(27

)

Total

 

$

668

 

$

671

 

$

339

 

 

$

581

 

$

613

 

$

668

 

Total assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

3,116

 

$

2,879

 

$

2,727

 

 

$

2,907

 

$

3,008

 

$

3,116

 

South America

 

1,230

 

1,218

 

1,178

 

 

923

 

1,088

 

1,230

 

Asia Pacific

 

730

 

757

 

676

 

 

711

 

711

 

730

 

EMEA

 

516

 

463

 

459

 

 

550

 

553

 

516

 

Total

 

$

5,592

 

$

5,317

 

$

5,040

 

 

$

5,091

 

$

5,360

 

$

5,592

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

130

 

$

128

 

$

96

 

 

$

111

 

$

112

 

$

130

 

South America

 

44

 

47

 

42

 

 

38

 

41

 

44

 

Asia Pacific

 

24

 

23

 

13

 

 

26

 

25

 

24

 

EMEA

 

13

 

13

 

4

 

 

20

 

16

 

13

 

Total

 

$

211

 

$

211

 

$

155

 

 

$

195

 

$

194

 

$

211

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

$

162

 

$

119

 

$

73

 

 

$

130

 

$

141

 

$

162

 

South America

 

75

 

84

 

65

 

 

90

 

76

 

75

 

Asia Pacific

 

33

 

24

 

10

 

 

30

 

28

 

33

 

EMEA

 

43

 

36

 

11

 

 

26

 

53

 

43

 

Total

 

$

313

 

$

263

 

$

159

 

 

$

276

 

$

298

 

$

313

 

 


(a) For 2014, includes a $3 million gain from the sale of an idled plant in Kenya.

(b) For 2014, includes $7 million of income relating to a tax indemnification agreement with an offsetting expense of $7 million recorded in the provision for income taxes (see also Note 8).

(c) For 2014, includes a $33 million write-off of impaired goodwill in the Southern Cone of South America.  For 2012, includes $20 million of charges for impaired assets and restructuring costs in Kenya, $11 million of charges to write-down certain equipment as part of the Company’s North American manufacturing optimization plan and $5 million of charges for impaired assets in China and Colombia.  For 2011, includes $10 million

90



Table of charges to write-down certain equipment as part of the Company’s North American manufacturing optimization plan.  For 2010, includes a $19 million write-off of impaired assets in Chile and a charge of $6 million principally consisting   of employee severance and related benefit costs associated with the termination of employees in Chile.Contents

 

The following table presents net sales to unaffiliated customers by country of origin for the last three years:

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

(in millions) 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

United States

 

$

2,035

 

$

1,863

 

$

1,157

 

Mexico

 

1,143

 

957

 

863

 

Brazil

 

731

 

841

 

662

 

Canada

 

564

 

536

 

419

 

Argentina

 

356

 

344

 

243

 

Korea

 

306

 

284

 

235

 

Others

 

1,397

 

1,394

 

788

 

Total

 

$

6,532

 

$

6,219

 

$

4,367

 

88



Table of Contents

 

 

Net Sales

 

(in millions) 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

United States

 

$

1,681

 

$

1,970

 

$

2,035

 

Mexico

 

955

 

1,130

 

1,143

 

Brazil

 

591

 

670

 

731

 

Canada

 

457

 

547

 

564

 

Korea

 

295

 

301

 

306

 

Argentina

 

262

 

305

 

356

 

Others

 

1,427

 

1,405

 

1,397

 

Total

 

$

5,668

 

$

6,328

 

$

6,532

 

 

The following table presents long-lived assets (excluding intangible assets and deferred income taxes) by country at December 31:

 

 

Long-lived Assets

 

 

Long-lived Assets

 

(in millions)

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

United States

 

$

1,176

 

$

1,197

 

$

1,183

 

 

$

809

 

$

822

 

$

824

 

Mexico

 

434

 

421

 

430

 

 

296

 

296

 

290

 

Brazil

 

387

 

415

 

443

 

 

294

 

321

 

346

 

Canada

 

204

 

194

 

198

 

 

154

 

181

 

199

 

Germany

 

133

 

151

 

114

 

Thailand

 

161

 

154

 

162

 

 

105

 

112

 

117

 

Korea

 

88

 

91

 

90

 

Argentina

 

162

 

160

 

155

 

 

82

 

92

 

111

 

Germany

 

171

 

147

 

134

 

United Kingdom

 

79

 

77

 

80

 

Korea

 

91

 

83

 

87

 

Others

 

346

 

348

 

345

 

 

214

 

219

 

234

 

Total

 

$

3,211

 

$

3,196

 

$

3,217

 

 

$

2,175

 

$

2,285

 

$

2,325

 

 

NOTE 1513 — Commitments and Contingencies

 

As previously reported, on April 22, 2011, Western Sugar and two other sugar companies filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against the Corn Refiners Association (“CRA”) and certain of its member companies, including the Company, alleging false and/or misleading statements relating to high fructose corn syrup in violation of the Lanham Act and California’s unfair competition law.  The complaint seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages.  On May 23, 2011, the plaintiffs amended the complaint to add additional plaintiffs, among other reasons.

 

On July 1, 2011, the CRA and the member companies in the case filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint on multiple grounds.  On October 21, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California dismissed all Federal and state claims against the Company and the other members of the CRA, with leave for the plaintiffs to amend their complaint, and also dismissed all state law claims against the CRA.

 

The state law claims against the CRA were dismissed pursuant to a California law known as the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute, which, according to the court’s opinion, allows early dismissal of meritless first amendment cases aimed at chilling expression through costly, time-consuming litigation.  The court held that the CRA’s statements were protected speech made in a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest (high fructose corn syrup).  Under the anti-SLAPP statute, the CRA is entitled to recover its attorney’s fees and costs from the plaintiffs.

 

On November 18, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint against certain of the CRA member companies, including the Company, seeking to reinstate the federal law claims, but not the state law claims, against certain of the CRA member companies, including the Company.us.  On December 16, 2011, the CRA member companies filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on multiple grounds. On July 31, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the motion to dismiss for all CRA member companies other than Roquette America, Inc.

 

On September 4, 2012, the Company and the other CRA member companies that remain defendants in the case filed an answer to the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint that, among other things, added a counterclaim against the Sugar

91



Table of Contents

Association.  The counterclaim alleges that the Sugar Association has made false and misleading statements that processed sugar differs from high fructose corn syrup in ways that are beneficial to consumers’ health (i.e., that consumers will be healthier if they consume foods and beverages containing processed sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup).  The counterclaim, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages. Although the counterclaim was initially only filed against the Sugar Association, the Company and the other CRA member companies that remain defendants in the Western Sugar case have reserved the right to add other plaintiffs to the counterclaim in the future.

 

On October 29, 2012, the Sugar Association and the other plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim and certain related portions of the defendants’ answer, each on multiple grounds.  On December 10, 2012, the remaining member

89



Table of Contents

companies which are defendants in the case responded to the motion to dismiss the counterclaim.  On January 14, 2013, the plaintiffs filed a reply to the defendants’ response to the motion to dismiss.  TheOn September 16, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied the motion to dismiss the counterclaim, which entitles the Company and the other CRA member companies to continue to pursue the counterclaim against the Sugar Association and the other plaintiffs.

On May 23, 2014, the defendants asked the court for leave to amend their counterclaim to add the individual sugar companies as counterclaim defendants.  The motion for leave to amend was denied by the court on August 4, 2014 and this decision is still pendingin the process of being appealed by the defendants.  On August 26, 2014, each of the Company and Tate & Lyle filed motions to disqualify the plaintiffs’ lead counsel, Squire Patton Boggs, due to a conflict of interest arising from Squire Sanders’ merger with Patton Boggs, a firm which represents each of the Company and Tate & Lyle.  In addition, on August 26, 2014, the defendants filed two separate motions for summary judgment, one on the issue of liability and the other on the issue of damages, and the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment with respect to the defendants’ counterclaim.

The motion to disqualify the plaintiff’s attorneys was argued before the court.court on both November 13 and November 25, 2014.  On February 13, 2015, the court granted the Company’s and Tate & Lyle’s motions to dismiss Squire Patton Boggs due to a conflict of interest.  The schedule for arguing the summary judgment motions and the pre-trial conference have been delayed until May 5, 2015 while the plaintiffs seek replacement counsel in the case.

 

The Company continues to believe that the second amended complaint is without merit and intends to vigorously defend this case.  In addition, the Company intends to vigorously pursue its rights in connection with the counterclaim.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into purchase commitments principally related to power supply and raw material sourcing.  Such agreements, including take or pay contracts, help to provide the Company with adequate supply of power and raw material at certain of our facilities. The Company would be subject to liquidated damages in the unlikely event that it did not fulfill such commitments.

The Company is also party to a large number of labor claims relating to its Brazilian operations.  The Company has reserved an aggregate of approximately $5 million as of December 31, 2014 in respect of these claims.  These labor claims primarily relate to dismissals, severance, health and safety, work schedules and salary adjustments.

The Company is currently subject to various other claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including certain environmental proceedings.proceedings and product liability claims.  The Company does not believe that the results of such legal proceedings, even if unfavorable to the Company, will be material to the Company.  There can be no assurance, however, that such claims or suits or those arising in the future, whether taken individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

9092



Table of Contents

 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

Summarized quarterly financial data is as follows:

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR *

 

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR *

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales before shipping and handling costs

 

$

1,658

 

$

1,720

 

$

1,764

 

$

1,726

 

 

$

1,435

 

$

1,568

 

$

1,545

 

$

1,450

 

Less: shipping and handling costs

 

84

 

85

 

85

 

82

 

 

78

 

85

 

85

 

82

 

Net sales

 

$

1,574

 

$

1,635

 

$

1,679

 

$

1,644

 

 

$

1,357

 

$

1,483

 

$

1,460

 

$

1,368

 

Gross profit

 

296

 

295

 

313

 

333

 

 

250

 

296

 

298

 

272

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

94

 

109

 

113

 

112

 

 

73

 

103

 

119

 

61

 

Basic earnings per common share of Ingredion

 

$

1.23

 

$

1.42

 

$

1.47

 

$

1.45

 

 

$

0.97

 

$

1.37

 

$

1.62

 

$

0.85

 

Diluted earnings per common share of Ingredion

 

$

1.21

 

$

1.40

 

$

1.45

 

$

1.42

 

 

$

0.96

 

$

1.35

 

$

1.60

 

$

0.83

 

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR *

 

 

1st QTR

 

2nd QTR

 

3rd QTR

 

4th QTR

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales before shipping and handling costs

 

$

1,536

 

$

1,667

 

$

1,712

 

$

1,629

 

 

$

1,662

 

$

1,715

 

$

1,696

 

$

1,579

 

Less: shipping and handling costs

 

76

 

82

 

84

 

81

 

 

78

 

82

 

84

 

80

 

Net sales

 

$

1,460

 

$

1,585

 

$

1,628

 

$

1,548

 

 

$

1,584

 

$

1,633

 

$

1,612

 

$

1,499

 

Gross profit

 

298

 

272

 

276

 

280

 

 

306

 

276

 

259

 

291

 

Net income attributable to Ingredion

 

154

 

79

 

88

 

95

 

 

111

 

95

 

86

 

104

 

Basic earnings per common share of Ingredion

 

$

2.01

 

$

1.03

 

$

1.15

 

$

1.25

 

 

$

1.43

 

$

1.22

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.37

 

Diluted earnings per common share of Ingredion

 

$

1.97

 

$

1.01

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.22

 

 

$

1.41

 

$

1.20

 

$

1.10

 

$

1.35

 

 


* Fourth quarter 20122014 includes a chargewrite-off of $9impaired goodwill in the Southern Cone of South America of $33 million ($9 million after-tax, or $0.110.44 per diluted common share) relating to the restructuring of the Kenyan operations, a gain of $5 million ($3 million after-tax, or $0.04 per diluted common share) associated with a change in a benefit plan in North America and a gain of $2 million of costs ($21 million after-tax, or $0.02 per diluted common share) from the sale of land.  Fourth quarter 2011 includes a gain of $30 million ($18 million after-tax, or $0.23 per diluted common share) pertaining to a change in a postretirement plan, integration costs of $11 million ($7 million after-tax, or $0.09 per diluted common share) pertainingrelated to the integration of National Starch and a restructuring charge of $4 million ($3 million after-tax, or $0.03 per diluted common share) relating to the Company’s North American manufacturing optimization plan.pending Penford acquisition.

 

9193



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9.                         CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 9A.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012.2014.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) are effective in providing reasonable assurance that all material information required to be filed in this report has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (b) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20122014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  This system of internal controls is designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with management’s authorization.

 

Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

1.              Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets.

2.              Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors.

3.              Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework of Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  Based on the evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.2014.  The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report included herein.

92



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 9B.     OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

94



Table of Contents

PART III

 

ITEM 10.                       DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The information contained under the headings “Proposal 1. Election of Directors,” “The Board and Committees” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 20132015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.  The information regarding executive officers called for by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is included in Part 1 of this report under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”  The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and controller.  The code of ethics is posted on the Company’s Internet website, which is found at www.ingredion.com.  The Company intends to include on its website any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer or controller that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K.

 

ITEM 11.                       EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The information contained under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report,” “Director Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 12.                       SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information contained under the headings “Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2012”2014” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 13.                       CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The information contained under the headings “Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons,” “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Independence of Board Members” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 14.        PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information contained under the heading “2012“2014 and 20112013 Audit Firm Fee Summary” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.                       EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

Item 15(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements

 

Financial Statements (see the Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 4851 of this report).

93



Table of Contents

 

Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

 

All financial statement schedules have been omitted because the information either is not required or

95



Table of Contents

is otherwise included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

 

Item 15(a)(3) Exhibits

 

The following list of exhibits includes both exhibits submitted with this Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and those incorporated by reference from other filings.

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

2.1*

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 14, 2014, by and among Penford Corporation, a Washington corporation, Prospect Sub, Inc., a Washington corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the Company, filed on November 3, 2014 as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, File No. 1-13397. Certain schedules referenced in the Agreement and Plan of Merger have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule will be furnished supplementally to the SEC upon request.

3.1*

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

3.2*

 

Certificate of Elimination of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Corn Products International, Inc., filed on May 25, 2010 as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 19, 2010, File No. 1-3397.1-13397.

 

 

 

3.3*

 

Amendments to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed on April 9, 2010 as Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, File No. 1-3397.1-13397.

 

 

 

3.43.4*

 

Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company.Company, filed on February 28, 2013 as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

3.5*

 

Amended By-Laws of the Company, filed on December 17, 201219, 2013 as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2012,13, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.1*

 

Revolving Credit Agreement dated October 22, 2012, among Ingredion Incorporated, the lenders signatory thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and Bank of Montreal, as Co-Syndication Agents, and Mizuho Corporate Bank (USA), U.S. Bank National Association and Branch Banking and Trust Company, as Co-Documentation Agents filed on October 25, 2012 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.2*

 

Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2010 by and between Corn Products International, Inc. and Prudential Investment Management, Inc., filed on May 5, 2010 as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

 

 

 

4.3*

 

Amendment No. 1 to Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2011 by and between Corn Products International, Inc. and Prudential Investment Management, Inc., filed on May 6, 2011 as Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

 

 

 

4.44.4*

 

Amendment No. 2 to Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012 by and between Ingredion Incorporated and Prudential Investment Management, Inc. ,

96



Table of Contents

filed on February 28, 2013 as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.5*

 

Indenture Agreement dated as of August 18, 1999 between the Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, filed on August 27, 1999 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.6*

 

Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 10, 2007 between Corn Products International, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, filed

94



Table of Contents

on April 10, 2007 as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 10, 2007, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.7*

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 10, 2007 between Corn Products International, Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, filed on April 10, 2007 as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 10, 2007, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.8*

 

Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 17, 2010, between Corn Products International, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor trustee to The Bank of New York), as trustee, filed on September 20, 2010 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2010, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.9*

 

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 17, 2010, between Corn Products International, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor trustee to The Bank of New York), as trustee, filed on September 20, 2010 as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2010, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.10*

 

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated September 17, 2010, between Corn Products International, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor trustee to The Bank of New York), as trustee, filed on September 20, 2010 as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 14, 2010, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

4.11*

 

Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated September 20, 2012, between Ingredion Incorporated and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (as successor trustee to The Bank of New York), as trustee, filed on September 21, 2012 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 20, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.1 *10.1*  ***

 

Stock Incentive Plan as effective July 18, 2012May 21, 2014, filed on April 8, 2014 as Exhibit 10.1Appendix B to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,Proxy Statement for the quarter ended September 30, 2012,its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.2** ***

Deferred Stock Unit Plan of the Company.

10.3*  ***

 

Form of Executive Severance Agreement entered into by Ilene S. Gordon, Cheryl K. Beebe, and Jack C. Fortnum and John F. Saucier, filed on May 6, 2008 as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.4*

International Share and Business Sale Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2010, between Akzo Nobel N.V. and Corn Products International, Inc., filed on September 21, 2010 as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2010, File No. 1-13397.

10.5*10.3**  ***

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by each of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors and the Named Executive Officers.Company’s executive officers.

 

 

 

10.6*10.4*  ***

 

Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors of the Company (Amended and Restated as of September 19, 2001), filed as Exhibit 4(d) to the Company’s

97



Table of Contents

Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-75844, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated December 1, 2004, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearYear ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-

95



Table of Contents

13397.1-13397.

 

 

 

10.7*10.5*  ***

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as effective July 18, 2012, filed ason November 2, 2012as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.8*10.6**  ***

 

Executive Life Insurance Plan.

 

 

 

10.9*10.7*  ***

 

Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the yearYear ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-13397.

10.8*  ***

Annual Incentive Plan as effective July 18, 2012 filed, on November 2, 2012 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

10.9*  ***

Executive Life Insurance Plan, Compensation Committee Summary, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.10*  ***

 

Annual IncentiveForm of Executive Life Insurance Plan as effective July 18, 2012Participation Agreement and Collateral Assignment entered into by Cheryl K. Beebe and Jack C. Fortnum, filed as Exhibit 10.110.15 to the Company’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q,10-K for the quarterYear ended September 30, 2012,December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.11*  ***

 

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for use in connection with awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, filed on February 27, 2009 as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearYear ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.12**

Tax Sharing Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between the Company and Bestfoods.

10.13* ***

Employee Benefits Agreement dated December 1, 1997 between the Company and Bestfoods, filed as Exhibit 4.E to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-43525.

10.14* ***

Executive Life Insurance Plan, Compensation Committee Summary, filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397.

10.15* ***

Form of Executive Life Insurance Plan Participation Agreement and Collateral Assignment entered into by Cheryl K. Beebe and Jack C. Fortnum, filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, File No. 1-13397.

10.16*  ***

 

Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for use in connection with awards under the Stock Incentive Plan,, filed on February 11, 20139, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2013,3, 2015, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.17*10.13*  ***

 

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement for use in connection with awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, filed on February 11, 20139, 2015 as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2013,3, 2015, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.18*10.14*  ***

Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement for use in connection with awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, filed on February 9, 2015 as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2015, File No. 1-13397.

10.15*

 

Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement between Corn Products Brasil-Ingredientes Industrias Ltda. and Companhia de Ga de Sao Paulo-Comgas, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearYear ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-13397.

 

9698



Table of Contents

 

10.19*10.16*  ***

 

Letter of Agreement dated as of April 2, 2009 between the Company and Ilene S. Gordon, filed on August 6, 2009 as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, file No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.20* ***

Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement for use in connection with awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, filed on February 11, 2013 as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 5, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

10.21*10.17*  ***

 

Letter of Agreement dated as of April 2, 2010 between the Company and Diane Frisch, filed on August 6, 2010 as Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.2010, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.22*10.18*  ***

 

Executive Severance Agreement dated as of May 1, 2010 between the Company and Diane Frisch, filed on August 6, 2010 as Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.2010, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.23* ***

Term Sheet, dated as of July 23, 2010 for Employment Agreements between the Company and Julio dos Reis and Productos de Maiz S.A. and Julio dos Reis, filed on November 5, 2010 as Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010.

10.24*10.19*  ***

 

Letter of Agreement dated as of September 28, 2010 between the Company and James Zallie, filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearYear ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-13397.

10.20*  ***

Form of Executive Severance Agreement entered into by James Zallie, Christine M. Castellano, Anthony P. DeLio and Robert F. Stefansic, filed on February 24, 2014 as Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

10.21 *  ***

Form of Executive Severance Agreement entered into by Ricardo de Abreu Souza and Jorgen Kokke, filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2014, File No. 1-13397.

10.22 *  ***

Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement, dated March 7, 2014, by and between the Company and Cheryl K. Beebe, filed on May 2, 2014 as Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2014, File No. 1-13397.

10.23 *  ***

Confidential Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of March 29, 2013, by and between the Company and Kimberly A. Hunter, filed on August 2, 2013 as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

10.24*  ***

Consulting Agreement, dated as of September 3, 2013, by and between the Company and Julio dos Reis, filed on November 1, 2013 as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.25*  ***

 

EmploymentMutual Separation Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2009,September 3, 2013, by and between National Starch LLCIngredion Argentina S.A. and James Zallie,Julio dos Reis, filed on November 1, 2013 as Exhibit 10.3110.37 to the Company’s AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearQuarter ended December 31, 2010,September 30, 2013, File No. 1-13397.

 

 

 

10.26*10.38*  ***

 

National Starch LLC Severance Plan For Full Time And Part Time Non-Union Employees, effective April 1, 2008,Letter of Agreement dated as of September 2, 2013 between the Company and Ricardo de Abreu Souza and Addendum dated as of February 19, 2014, filed February 24, 2014 as Exhibit 10.3210.38 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearYear ended December 31, 2010,2013, File No. 1-13397.

10.27 * ***

Executive Severance Agreement dated as of December 28, 2011 between the Company and James Zallie, filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 1-13397.

11.1

Earnings Per Share Computation

 

 

 

12.1

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

 

 

 

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

99



Table of Contents

 

23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

24.1

 

Power of Attorney

 

 

 

31.1

 

CEO Section 302 Certification Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

31.2

 

CFO Section 302 Certification Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.1

 

CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

 

 

32.2

 

CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code as created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

97



Table of Contents

 

101

 

The following financial information from the Ingredion Incorporated Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20122014 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity and Redeemable Equity; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

 


*

Incorporated herein by reference as indicated in the exhibit description.

**

Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

***

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to item

*Incorporated herein by reference as indicated in the exhibit description.

**Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.

*** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this form pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.

 

98100



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 27th20th day of February, 2013.2015.

 

 

INGREDION INCORPORATED

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Ilene S. Gordon

 

 

Ilene S. Gordon

 

 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities indicated and on the 27th20th day of February, 2013.2015.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

 

 

/s/ Ilene S. Gordon

 

Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Ilene S. Gordon

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Cheryl K. BeebeJack C. Fortnum

 

Chief Financial Officer

Cheryl K. BeebeJack C. Fortnum

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Matthew R. Galvanoni

 

Controller

Matthew R. Galvanoni

 

 

 

 

 

*Richard J. Almeida

Director

Richard J. Almeida

*Luis Aranguren-Trellez

 

Director

Luis Aranguren-Trellez

 

 

 

 

 

*Paul HanrahanDavid B. Fischer

 

Director

Paul HanrahanDavid B. Fischer

 

 

 

 

 

*Karen L. HendricksPaul Hanrahan

 

Director

Karen L. HendricksPaul Hanrahan

 

 

 

 

 

*Wayne M. Hewett

 

Director

Wayne M. Hewett

 

 

 

 

 

*Rhonda L. Jordan

Director

Rhonda L. Jordan

*Gregory B. Kenny

 

Director

Gregory B. Kenny

 

 

99



Table of Contents

 

*Barbara A. Klein

 

Director

Barbara A. Klein

 

 

101



Table of Contents

 

* James M. RinglerVictoria J. Reich

 

Director

James M. RinglerVictoria J. Reich

 

 

 

 

 

*Dwayne A. Wilson

 

Director

Dwayne A. Wilson

 

 

 

 

 

*By:

/s/ /s/ Christine M. Castellano

 

 

Christine M. Castellano

 

 

Attorney-in-fact

 

 

 

(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the controller and a majority of the directors of Ingredion Incorporated)

 

100102