Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, N.A.
Indicate by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐No☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer | ☐ |
| | | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☑ |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | Smaller reporting company | ☐ |
|
|
| | | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Not applicable.
PART I
The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10–K:
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
Not Applicable.
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures. |
Not Applicable.
The following information is substitute information provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 1112(b)1112 (b) of Regulation AB. Significant Obligor Financial Information
No single obligor represents more than 10% of the pool assets held by the Issuing Entity.
Items 1114(b)1114 (b)(2) of Regulation AB. Credit Enhancement and Other Support, Except for Certain Derivatives
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides external credit enhancement or other support with respect to payments on the notes issued by the Issuing Entity.
Items 1115(b)1115 (b) of Regulation AB. Credit Derivatives Instruments
No entity or group of affiliated entities provides derivative instruments with respect to payments on the notes issued by the Issuing Entity.
Item 1117 of Regulation AB. Legal Proceedings
Other than as stated in the following paragraphs, no legal proceedings are pending against the Issuing Entity, Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.) (“Navient Solutions”), as the Sponsor, the Servicer and the Administrator, Navient Funding, LLC, as the Depositor (the “Depositor”) and registrant under Registration Statement Number 333-190926 (the “Registrant”) or to the Registrant’s knowledge, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as the Indenture Trustee, or Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., that are or would be material to the holders of the notes issued by the Issuing Entity, nor does the Registrant know of any such proceeding contemplated by any governmental authorities.
The following four paragraphs are disclosure received from Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), the servicer for this transaction.
On January 18, 2017, the CFPB and Attorneys General for the State of Illinois and the State of Washington (collectively the “Attorneys General”) initiated civil actions naming Navient Corporation (“Navient”) has been named as defendant in a number of putative class action and several of its subsidiaries as defendantsother cases alleging violations of Federalvarious state and Statefederal consumer protection statutes,laws including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (CFPA), the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), in adversarial proceedings under the United States Bankruptcy Code, and various state consumer protection laws. These civil actions are related to the aforementioned CIDs and the NORA letter that were previously issued by the CFPB and the Attorneys General. In addition to these matters, a number of lawsuits have been filed by nongovernmental parties or may be filed by additional governmental or nongovernmental parties, including other state attorneys general or private litigants, seeking damages or other remedies related to similar issues raised by the CFPB and the Attorneys General. One such lawsuit was filed on October 5, 2017 by the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, naming Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC as defendants alleging claims and seeking legal and equitable relief that are substantially similar to claims made and relief by the CFPB and other Attorneys General. The Company filed its Motion to Dismiss on March 20, 2017 with respect to the Attorneys General actions and on March 24, 2017 with respect to the CFPB action. In April 2017, the CFPB filed their response to our Motion to Dismiss and in May 2017, we filed our response. A hearing on our Motion to Dismiss was held on June 27, 2017 and the Court denied our motion on August 4, 2017. On May 24, 2017, the WA AG filed their response to our Motion to Dismiss and on July 5, 2017, we filed our response. The Motion to Dismiss was denied on July 10, 2017, after a hearing. On May 24, 2017, the IL AG filed their response to our Motion to Dismiss and on June 30, 2017, we filed our response. A hearing on our Motion to Dismiss was held on July 18, 2017 and as of March 29, 2018, the Court has not ruled on the motion. In relation to the Pennsylvania Attorney General lawsuit, the Company filed its Motion to Dismiss on December 22, 2017. The motion has not been heard by the court. As the Company has previously stated, we believe the suits improperly seek to impose penalties on Navient based on new servicing standards applied retroactively and applied only against one servicer and that the allegations are false. We intend to vigorously defend against the allegations included in these lawsuits and any subsequent lawsuits that may be filed by governmental or nongovernmental parties, including other state attorneys general or private litigants, seeking similar damages and remedies. At this point in time, the CompanyNavient is unable to anticipate the timing of a resolution or the ultimate impact that these legal proceedings may have on the Company’sits consolidated financial position, liquidity, results of operation or cash flows. As a result, it is not possible at this time to estimate a range of potential exposure, if any, for amounts that may be payable in connection with these matters and reservesloss contingency accruals have not been established. It is possible that an adverse ruling or rulings may have a material adverse impact on Navient, Navient Solutions and/or their affiliates or on the Company.financial ability of the depositor, the servicer or a seller to fulfill an obligation to purchase or repurchase trust student loans in connection with a breach of representation, warranty or covenant.
In January 2017, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the CFPB) and Attorneys General for the State of Illinois and the State of Washington initiated civil actions naming Navient and several of its subsidiaries (including Navient Solutions) as defendants alleging violations of certain Federal and State consumer protection statutes, including the CFPA, FCRA, FDCPA and various state consumer protection laws. The Attorneys General for the States of Pennsylvania, California, Mississippi, and New Jersey also initiated actions against Navient and certain subsidiaries alleging violations of various state and federal consumer protection laws based upon similar alleged acts or failures to act. In addition to these matters, a number of lawsuits have been filed by nongovernmental parties or, in the future, may be filed by additional governmental or nongovernmental parties seeking damages or other remedies related to similar issues raised by the CFPB and the State Attorneys General. In January 2022, Navient entered into a series of Consent Judgment and Orders (the “Agreements”) with 40 State Attorneys General to resolve all matters in dispute related to the State Attorneys General cases as well as the related investigations, subpoenas, civil investigative demands and inquiries from various other state regulators. These Agreements do not resolve the litigation involving Navient and the CFPB. Navient has cancelled the loan balance of approximately 66,000 borrowers with qualifying Private Education Loans that were originated largely between 2002 and 2010 and later defaulted and charged off. The loans cancelled have aggregate outstanding balances of approximately $1.7 billion. The expense to Navient to cancel these loans was approximately $50 million which represents the amount of expected future recoveries of these charged-off loans on the balance sheet. In addition, Navient agreed to make a one-time payment of approximately $145 million to the states. In the fourth quarter of 2021 when such loss became probable, Navient recognized total regulatory expenses of approximately $205 million related to this matter.
As Navient has previously stated, Navient believes the allegations in the CFPB suit are false and that they improperly seek to impose penalties on Navient based on new, previously unannounced servicing standards applied retroactively against only one servicer. Navient therefore has denied these allegations and is vigorously defending against the allegations in that case. Due to recent developments in connection with the CFPB case, Navient increased its accrual for probable incurred loss in this matter to $72.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2023. The litigation process is not predictable and can lead to unexpected results and therefore it is reasonably possible that Navient’s exposure to loss may exceed any amounts accrued.
On April 12, 2023, Navient reached an agreement in principle (“Settlement”) with certain plaintiffs for a nationwide settlement of claims raised in the following bankruptcy adversary actions: Coyle v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 22-80018 (Bankr. W.D. Mich.); Homaidan v. SLM Corp., No. 1:17-ap-01085 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.); Mazloom v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 20-80033-6 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y.); and Woodard v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 08-81442 (Bankr. D. Neb.) collectively referred to as the “Bankruptcy Cases.” The Settlement has received final court approval. Under the Settlement, Navient will forego the collection of defined balances for borrowers or co-borrowers of certain private loans — all of which were originated prior to Navient’s separation — who have received a discharge in bankruptcy during the periods covered by the agreements. As a result, Navient recorded a $23 million additional private loan provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2016,2023 related to the estimated future charge offs that are expected to occur. Navient Corporation, certainhas also agreed to fund settlement funds. Navient officers and directors, and the underwriters of certain Navient securities offerings were sued in three putative securities class action lawsuits filed on behalf of certain investors in Navient stock or Navient unsecured debt. These three cases, which were filedanticipates that any cash contribution it will be required to make to these funds will not exceed $44 million in the U.S. District Courtaggregate and will be fully covered by insurance. The net impact to operating expense for this element of the settlement for the Districtfirst quarter of Delaware, were consolidated by2023 was $0 due to the District Court, with Lord Abbett Funds appointed as Lead Plaintiff. The captionaccrual of the consolidated case is Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund, Inc., et al. v. Navient Corporation, et al. The plaintiffs filed their amended and consolidated complaint in September 2016. The Court ruled on our Motion to Dismiss on September 6, 2017 and dismissed the complaint in its entirety without prejudice. The plaintiffs filed a further amended and restated complaint on November 17, 2017. The Navient defendants intend to vigorously defend against the allegations.offsetting insurance reimbursements.
During the fourth quarter of 2017, Navient Corporation and certain Navient officers were named in two putative class action lawsuits filed on behalf of certain investors in Navient stock entitled Pope v. Navient Corporation, et al and Gross v. Navient Corporation, et al. These cases have been consolidated. The Navient defendants intend to vigorously defend against these allegations.
At this stage in the proceedings, we are unable to anticipate the timing of resolution or the ultimate impact, if any, that the legal proceedings may have on the consolidated financial position, liquidity, results of operations or cash-flows of Navient and its affiliates. As a result, it is not possible at this time to estimate a range of potential exposure, if any, for amounts that may be payable in connection with these matters and reserves have not been established. It is possible that an adverse ruling or rulings may have a material adverse impact on the Company.
The following paragraph isparagraphs are disclosure received from Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (“CTC”), as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo Bank”) concerning theirWells Fargo Bank’s role as trustee of certain residential mortgage backed securities trusts.
On June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors filed a civil complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee under 276 residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts, which was later amended on July 18,trusts.
In December 2014, to increase the number of trusts to 284 RMBS trusts. On November 24, 2014, the plaintiffsPhoenix Light SF Limited (Phoenix Light) and certain related entities filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the state court action without prejudice. That same day, a group of institutional investors filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”)alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against the bankN.A., in its capacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Federal Court Complaint”). In December 2014,a number of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court action was granted. As with the prior state court action, the Federal Court Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneously against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, BankSouthern District of New York, MellonIKB International and US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs. The Federal Court Complaint againstIKB Deutsche Industriebank (together, IKB) in New York state court, and Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, alleges that theN.A., as trustee, caused losses to investors, and assertsplaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee'strustee’s alleged failure to: (i)to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damagesIn July 2022, the district court dismissed Phoenix Light’s claims and certain of the claims asserted by Commerzbank AG, and subsequently entered judgment in an unspecified amount, reimbursementeach case in favor of expenses, and equitable relief. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have been filed against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. In August 2022, Phoenix Light and other trusteesCommerzbank AG each appealed the district court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Phoenix Light dismissed its appeal in the District Court by RMBS investors in these and other transactions, and these cases againstMay 2023, terminating its case. In November 2023, Wells Fargo Bank, are proceeding before the same District Court judge. A similar complaint was also filed May 27, 2016 in New York state court by a different plaintiff investor. On January 19, 2016,N.A. entered into an order was entered in connectionagreement with the Federal Court Complaint in which the District Court declinedIKB to exercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Federal Court Complaint; the District Court also allowed plaintiffs to file amended complaints as to the remaining, non-dismissed trusts, if they so chose, and three amended complaints have been filed. On December 17, 2016, the investor plaintiffs in the 261 trusts dismissed from the Federal Court Complaint filed a new complaint in New York state court (the “State Court Complaint”). In September 2017, Royal Park Investments SA/NV (“Royal Park”), one of the plaintiffs in the District Court cases againstresolve IKB’s claims. Wells Fargo Bank, filed a putativeN.A. previously settled two class action complaint relating to two trusts seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages based on Wells Fargo Bank’s indemnification from trust funds for legal fees and expenses Wells Fargo Bank incurs or has incurred in defending the District Court caseactions filed by Royal Park. institutional investors and an action filed by the National Credit Union Administration with similar allegations.
With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs'plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the related RMBS trusts.
PART II
The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10–K:
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Item 6. | Selected Financial Data |
| Item 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
| Item 9B. | Other Information |
| Item 9C. | Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. |
Not applicable.
Nothing to report.
PART III
The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
| Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The following information is substitute information provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10-K:
Item 1119 of Regulation AB. Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Pursuant to the Instruction to Item 1119 of Regulation AB, information required by Item 1119 has been omitted from this Report because substantially the same information related to affiliates of the Issuing Entity and certain relationships and related transactions is provided in the section titled “The Sponsor, Servicer and Administrator” of the base prospectus, previously filed with the SEC on February 20, 2015 pursuant to Securities Act Rule 424, file number 333-190926.
Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria
Navient Solutions, LLC, as the Servicer, Navient Solutions, LLC, as the Administrator, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as the Indenture Trustee, and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (collectively, the “Servicing Parties”), have each been identified by the Depositor as parties participating in the servicing function with respect to the asset pool held by the Issuing Entity. Each of the Servicing Parties has completed a report on assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it (each a “Servicing Report”), which Servicing Reports are attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K. Each of the Servicing Parties have provided an attestation report (each an “Attestation Report”) by one or more public accounting firms, which reports are also attached as exhibits to this Report. None of the Servicing Reports or Attestation Reports has identified any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria as applicable to the respective Servicing Party. There have been no material instances of noncompliance with the servicing criteria for the period of this Report.
Item 1123 of Regulation AB. Servicer Compliance Statement
A Servicer Compliance Statement for each of Navient Solutions, LLC, as Servicer, and Navient Solutions, LLC, as Administrator, is included as an exhibit to this Report.
PART IV
| Item 15. | ExhibitsExhibit and Financial Statement Schedules |
| (a) | List of Documents Filed as Part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K |
| (3) | See Item 15 (b) below. |
| (b) | Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K |
| EXHIBIT | | DESCRIPTION |
| |
|
| 4.1 | | Indenture dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | |
| 10.1 | | Indenture dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | |
| 10.2 | | Servicing Agreement dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, and Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.)., as servicer and as administrator, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.7 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | |
| 10.3 | | Administration Agreement dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, Navient Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as servicer and as administrator, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | |
| 31.1* | | Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.Certification (Section 302 Certification). |
| | |
| 33.1* | | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as Servicer and Administrator, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| 33.2* | | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| 33.3* | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
| | |
| 34.1* | | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as Servicer and Administrator, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| 34.2* | | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| 34.3* | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
| | |
| 35.1* | | Statement of Compliance of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.)., as Servicer and Administrator for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| | | * Filed herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed, on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Dated: March 30, 201828, 2024 | NAVIENT FUNDING, LLC, the Depositor for itself as Registrant and on behalf of Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1 |
|
By: | /s/ CHRISTIAN LOWN | |
Name: | Christian Lown | |
| | |
|
| By: | /s/ JOE FISHER |
|
| | Name: | Joe Fisher |
|
| | Title: | President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer) |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT.
No annual report, proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material has been sent to holders of the notes issued by the Issuing Entity during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Registrant does not intend to furnish such materials subsequent to the filing of the report.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number | | Exhibit |
| | | |
| | Indenture dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | | |
| | Indenture dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | | |
| | Servicing Agreement dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, and Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as servicer and as administrator, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.7 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | | |
| | Administration Agreement dated as of February 26, 2015 among Navient Student Loan Trust 2015-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as eligible lender trustee, Navient Funding, LLC, as depositor, and Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as servicer and as administrator, which is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.6 of the Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the Commission on February 26, 2015, with a file number of 333-190926-11. |
| | | |
| | Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.Certification (Section 302 Certification). |
| | | |
| | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as Servicer and Administrator, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | | |
| | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| | Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria concerning servicing activities of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
| | | |
| | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as Servicer and Administrator, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | | |
| | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | |
| | Independent Accountants’ Attestation Report concerning servicing activities of Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023. |
| | | |
| | Statement of Compliance of Navient Solutions, LLC (formerly, Navient Solutions, Inc.), as Servicer and Administrator for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023. |
| | | |
| | | * Filed herewith. |