Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162018

or
  
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______to_______

evergylogoa04.jpg
  Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter,  
Commission state of incorporation, address of principal I.R.S. Employer
File Number executive offices and telephone number Identification Number
     
001-32206001-38515 GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATEDEVERGY, INC. 43-191680382-2733395
  (Aa Missouri Corporation)  
  1200 Main Street  
  Kansas City, Missouri  64105  
  (816) 556-2200  
     
001-03523WESTAR ENERGY, INC.48-0290150
(a Kansas Corporation)
818 South Kansas Avenue
Topeka, Kansas 66612
(785) 575-6300
000-51873 KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 44-0308720
  (Aa Missouri Corporation)  
  1200 Main Street  
  Kansas City, Missouri  64105  
  (816) 556-2200  
Each of the following classes or series of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act is registered on the New York Stock Exchange:
       
Registrant Title of each class    
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. Common Stock, without par value
Depositary Shares Each Representing a 1/20th Interest in a Share of 7.00% Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock    
       
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Westar Energy, Inc. Common Stock $0.01 par value and Kansas City Power & Light Company Common Stock without par value.
       
       



Table of Contents


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc.YesXxNo_o 
Westar Energy, Inc.YesoNox
Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYes_oNoXx 
              
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc.Yes_oNoXx Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYes_NoX 
              
Westar Energy, Inc.YesoNox
Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYesoNox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc.YesXxNo_o 
Westar Energy, Inc.YesxNoo
Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYesXxNo_o 
              
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc.YesXxNo_o 
Westar Energy, Inc.YesxNoo
Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYesXxNo_o 
              
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K.
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedXEvergy, Inc.    Kansas City Power & Light CompanyXx    
Westar Energy, Inc.x
Kansas City Power & Light Companyx
              
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large"large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”" "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and “smaller reporting company”"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Great Plains Energy Incorporated Large accelerated filerXAccelerated filer_    
 Large Accelerated FilerAccelerated Filer Non-accelerated filerFiler_Smaller reporting companyReporting Company_Emerging Growth Company
Evergy, Inc.xoooo
Westar Energy, Inc.ooxoo
    
Kansas City Power & Light Company Large accelerated filero_Accelerated filer_oxoo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Evergy, Inc.o    
  Non-accelerated filerXSmaller reporting company_    
Westar Energy, Inc.o
Kansas City Power & Light Companyo
              
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc.Yes_oNoXx Kansas City Power & Light CompanyYes_NoX 
              
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (based on the closing price of its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2016) was approximately $4,700,571,576. All of the common equity of Kansas City Power & Light Company is held by Great Plains Energy Incorporated, an affiliate of Kansas City Power & Light Company.
    
Westar Energy, Inc.YesoNox          
On February 21, 2017, Great Plains Energy Incorporated had 215,384,601 shares of common stock outstanding. 
On February 21, 2017, Kansas City Power & Light Company had one share of common stock outstanding and held by Great Plains Energy Incorporated.
              
Kansas City Power & Light Company meetsYesoNox


Table of Contents


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of Evergy, Inc. (based on the closing price of its common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2018) was approximately $15,236,578,926. All of the common equity of Westar Energy, Inc. and Kansas City Power & Light Company is held by Evergy, Inc.
On February 15, 2019, Evergy, Inc. had 254,630,033 shares of common stock outstanding. 
On February 15, 2019, Westar Energy, Inc. and Kansas City Power & Light Company each had one share of common stock outstanding and held by Evergy, Inc.
Westar Energy, Inc. and Kansas City Power & Light Company meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction (I)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and isare therefore filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format.
              
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the 20172019 annual meeting proxy statement of Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.


This combined annual report on Form 10-K is provided by the following registrants: Evergy, Inc. (Evergy), Westar Energy, Inc. (Westar Energy) and Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCP&L) (collectively, the Evergy Companies). Information relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant solely on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating exclusively to the other registrants.


Table of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS
  
Page
Number
 
 
  
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
   
 

Table of Contents


This combined annual report on Form 10-K is being filed by Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Great Plains Energy) and Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCP&L). KCP&L is a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy and represents a significant portion of its assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and operations. Thus, all information contained in this report relates to, and where required is filed by, Great Plains Energy. Information that is specifically identified in this report as relating solely to Great Plains Energy, such as its financial statements and all information relating to Great Plains Energy's other operations, businesses and subsidiaries, including KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company (GMO), does not relate to, and is not filed by, KCP&L. KCP&L makes no representation as to that information. Neither Great Plains Energy nor its other subsidiaries have any obligation in respect of KCP&L's debt securities and holders of such securities should not consider Great Plains Energy's or its other subsidiaries' financial resources or results of operations in making a decision with respect to KCP&L's debt securities. Similarly, KCP&L has no obligation in respect of securities of Great Plains Energy or its other subsidiaries.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements made in this report that are not based on historical facts are forward-looking, may involve risks and uncertainties, and are intended to be as of the date when made. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the expected financial and operational benefits of the merger of Great Plains Energy's proposed acquisition ofEnergy Incorporated (Great Plains Energy) and Westar Energy Inc. (Westar),that resulted in the outcomecreation of regulatory proceedings,Evergy (including cost savings, operational efficiencies and the impact of the merger on earnings per share), cost estimates of capital projects, dividend growth, share repurchases, balance sheet and credit ratings, rebates to customers, the outcome of regulatory and legal proceedings, employee issues and other matters affecting future operations.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Great Plains Energy and KCP&Lthe Evergy Companies are providing a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the provided forward-looking information. These important factors include: future economic conditions in regional, national and international markets and their effectsany related impact on sales, prices and costs; prices and availability of electricity in regional and national wholesale markets; market perception of the energy industry Great Plains Energy and KCP&L;the Evergy Companies; changes in business strategy operations or development plans;operations; the outcomeimpact of contract negotiations for goods and services; effects of current or proposedunpredictable federal, state and federallocal political, legislative, judicial and regulatory actions or developments, including but not limited to, deregulation, re-regulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry; decisions of regulators regarding rates the Companiesthat Westar Energy and KCP&L (or other regulated subsidiaries of Evergy) can charge for electricity; adverse changes in applicable laws, regulations, rules, principles or practices, or the interpretations thereof, governing tax, accounting and environmental matters, including but not limited to, air and water quality;quality and waste management and disposal; changes in the energy trading markets in which the Evergy Companies participate, including retroactive repricing of transactions by regional transmission organizations and independent system operators; the impact of climate change, including reduced demand for coal-based energy because of actual or perceived climate impacts and the development of alternate energy sources; financial market conditions and performance, including but not limited to, changes in interest rates and credit spreads and in availability and cost of capital and the effects on derivatives and hedges, nuclear decommissioning trust and pension plan assets and costs; impairments of long-lived assets or goodwill; credit ratings; inflation rates; effectiveness of risk management policies and procedures and the ability of counterparties to satisfy their contractual commitments; impact of terrorist acts, including but not limited to, cyber terrorism; ability to carry out marketing and sales plans; weather conditions, including but not limited to, weather-related damage and their effectsthe impact on sales, prices and costs; cost, availability, quality and deliverabilitytimely provision of equipment, supplies, labor and fuel; the inherent uncertainties in estimating the effects of weather, economic conditions, climate change and other factors on customer consumption and financial results; ability to achieve generation goals and the occurrence and duration of planned and unplanned generation outages; delays in the anticipated in-service dates and cost increases of generation, transmission, distribution or other projects; Great Plains Energy'sthe Evergy Companies' ability to successfully manage itstheir transmission and distribution development plans and transmission joint ventures or to integrate or restructure the transmission joint ventures of Westar;ventures; the inherent risks associated with the ownership and operation of a nuclear facility, including but not limited to, environmental, health, safety, regulatory and financial risks; workforce risks, including but not limited to, increased costs of retirement, health care and other benefits; the ability of Great Plains Energy to obtain the regulatory approvals necessary to complete the anticipated acquisition of Westar and the terms of those approvals; the risk that a condition to the closing of the anticipated acquisition of Westar or the committed debt or equity financing may not be satisfied or that the anticipated acquisition may fail to close; the failure to obtain, or to obtain on favorable terms, any financings necessary to complete or permanently finance the anticipated acquisition of Westar and the costs of such financing; the outcome of any legal proceedings, regulatory proceedings or enforcement matters that may be instituted relating to the anticipated acquisition of Westar; the costs incurred to consummate the anticipated acquisition of Westar; the possibility that the expected value creation from the anticipated acquisition of Westarmerger will not be realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period; difficulties related to the credit ratingsintegration of Great Plains Energy following the anticipated acquisition of Westar;two companies; disruption from the anticipated acquisition of Westarmerger making it
Table of Contents


more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees, regulators or suppliers andsuppliers; the diversion of management time and attention on the proposed transactions;time; and other risks and uncertainties.
This list of factors is not all-inclusive because it is not possible to predict all factors. Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors included in this report should be carefully read for further understanding of potential risks for each of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.the Evergy Companies. Other sections of this report and other periodic reports filed by each of Great Plains Energy and KCP&Lthe Evergy Companies with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should also be read for more information regarding risk factors. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement. Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Table of Contents


GLOSSARY OF TERMS 
The following is a glossary of frequently used abbreviations or acronyms that are found throughout this report.
Abbreviation or Acronym Definition
   
AEPTHCAEP AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
AFUDC Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
Amended Merger AgreementAmended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar Energy, Monarch Energy Holding, Inc. and King Energy, Inc.
AMTAlternative Minimum Tax
ARO Asset Retirement Obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
ASRAccelerated share repurchase
ASU Accounting Standards Update
CCRs Coal combustion residuals
Clean Air ActCAA Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
CO2
 Carbon dioxide
CompanyCOLI Great Plains Energy Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiariesCorporate-owned life insurance
CompaniesCPP Great Plains Energy Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries and KCP&L and its consolidated subsidiariesClean Power Plan
CWAClean Water Act
DOE Department of Energy
EBITDAEarnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
ECAEnergy Cost Adjustment
EIRR Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EPS Earnings per common share
ERISA Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
EvergyEvergy, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
Evergy BoardEvergy Board of Directors
Evergy CompaniesEvergy, Westar Energy, and KCP&L, collectively, which are individual registrants within the Evergy consolidated group
Exchange ActThe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FCCFMBs The Federal Communications Commission
FTCFederal Trade CommissionFirst mortgage bonds
GAAP Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
GHGGreenhouse gas
GMO KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains EnergyEvergy
GPETHC GPE Transmission Holding Company LLC, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains EnergyEvergy
Great Plains Energy Great Plains Energy Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries
Great Plains Energy BoardGreat Plains Energy Board of Directors
HSRHart-Scott-Rodino
KCC The State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas
KCP&L Kansas City Power & Light Company, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy,Evergy, and its consolidated subsidiaries
KCP&L Receivables CompanyKDHE Kansas City PowerDepartment of Health & Light ReceivablesEnvironment
KGEKansas Gas and Electric Company, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of KCP&LWestar Energy
King EnergyKing Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Evergy
kWh Kilowatt hour
MD&AManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
MDNRMissouri Department of Natural Resources
MECGMidwest Energy Consumers Group
MEEIAMissouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act
Table of Contents


Abbreviation or Acronym Definition
   
Merger AgreementLTISA AgreementLong-Term Incentive and Plan of Merger dated as of May 29, 2016, by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar and Merger SubShare Award plan
Merger SubMEEIA GP Star, Inc., a Kansas corporation that will be merged with and into Westar, pursuant to the Merger AgreementMissouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act
MGPMMBtu Manufactured gas plantMillions of British thermal units
MPS MerchantMonarch Energy MPS Merchant Services,Monarch Energy Holding, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of GMO
MPSC Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri
MW Megawatt
MWh Megawatt hour
NAAQsNational Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAV Net Asset Value
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NEILNuclear Electric Insurance Limited
NOLNet operating loss
NOx2
 Nitrogen oxide
NPNSNormal purchases and normal salesdioxide
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OCIPISA Other Comprehensive IncomePlant-in service accounting
OMERSPM OCM Credit Portfolio LPParticulate matter
PRBPrairie Wind Powder River BasinPrairie Wind Transmission, LLC, 50% owned by Westar Energy
QCARSU Quarterly Cost Adjustment
RCRAResource Conservation and Recovery Act
RESRAMRenewable Energy Standard Rate Adjustment MechanismRestricted share unit
RTO Regional Transmission Organizationtransmission organization
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SERPSupplemental Executive Retirement Plan
SO2
 Sulfur dioxide
SPP Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
TCJATax Cuts and Jobs Act
TCR Transmission Congestion RightRights
TDCTFR Transmission Delivery Chargeformula rate
Transource Transource Energy, LLC and its subsidiaries, 13.5% owned by GPETHC
WCNOCWACC Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating CorporationWeighted average cost of capital
VIEVariable interest entity
Westar Energy Westar Energy, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Evergy, and its consolidated subsidiaries
Westar BoardWIIN Westar Board of DirectorsWater Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation
Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Generating Station
WOTUSWaters of the United States

Table of Contents


PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Great PlainsEvergy, Inc., Westar Energy, IncorporatedInc. and Kansas City Power & Light Company are separate registrants filing this combined annual report on Form 10-K. The terms "Great Plains"Evergy," "Westar Energy," "Company," "KCP&L" and "Companies""Evergy Companies" are used throughout this report. "Great Plains"Evergy" refers to Evergy, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. "Westar Energy" and the "Company" referrefers to Great PlainsWestar Energy, IncorporatedInc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. "KCP&L" refers to Kansas City Power & Light Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. "Companies"subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. "Evergy Companies" refers to Great PlainsEvergy, Westar Energy, Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries and KCP&L, and itscollectively, which are individual registrants within the Evergy consolidated subsidiaries.group.
Information in other Items of this report as to which reference is made in this Item 1 is hereby incorporated by reference in this Item 1. The use of terms such as "see" or "refer to" shall be deemed to incorporate into this Item 1 the information to which such reference is made.
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATEDEVERGY, INC.
Great Plains Energy, a Missouri corporation incorporated in 2001 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri,Evergy is a public utility holding company incorporated in 2017 and does not own or operate any significant assets other thanheadquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Evergy operates primarily through the stock of its subsidiaries and cash and cash equivalents and a time deposit to be used to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of following wholly-owned direct subsidiaries:
Westar Energy Inc. (Westar). Great Plains Energy's wholly owned direct subsidiariesis an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Kansas. Westar Energy has one active wholly-owned subsidiary with significant operations, are as follows:Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KGE).
KCP&L is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers primarily in the states of Missouri and Kansas.
KCP&L has one active wholly owned subsidiary, Kansas City Power & Light ReceivablesGreater Missouri Operations Company (KCP&L Receivables Company).
GMO(GMO) is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Missouri. GMO also provides regulated steam service to certain customers in the St. Joseph, Missouri area. GMO has two active wholly owned subsidiaries, GMO Receivables Company and MPS Merchant Services, Inc. (MPS Merchant).  MPS Merchant has certain long-term natural gas contracts remaining from its former non-regulated trading operations.
Great Plains Energy also wholly owns GPE Transmission Holding Company, LLC (GPETHC). GPETHC owns 13.5% of Transource Energy, LLC (Transource) with the remaining 86.5% owned by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, (AEPTHC), a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). Transource is focused on the development of competitive electric transmission projects. GPETHC accounts for its investment in Transource under the equity method. Transource
Westar Energy also owns a 50% interest in Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC (Prairie Wind), which is focused on the developmenta joint venture between Westar Energy and affiliates of competitive electricAEP and Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. Prairie Wind owns a 108-mile, 345 kV double-circuit transmission projects.
On May 29, 2016, Great Plains Energy entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar, and, from and after its accession to the Merger Agreement, GP Star, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energyline that provides transmission service in the State of Kansas (Merger Sub)Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP). Pursuant toWestar Energy accounts for its investment in Prairie Wind under the Merger Agreement, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge withequity method.
Evergy assesses financial performance and into Westar, with Westar continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon closing, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy will acquire Westar for (i) $51.00allocates resources on a consolidated basis (i.e., operates in cash and (ii) a number, rounded to the nearest 1/10,000 of a share, of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock, equal to an exchange ratio that may vary between 0.2709 and 0.3148, based upon the volume-weighted average price per share of Great Plains Energy common stock during a 20 consecutive full trading day period ending on (and including) the third trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the merger, for each share of Westar common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, with Westar becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
Great Plains Energy's sole reportable business segment is electric utility. For information regarding the revenues, income and assets attributable to the electric utility business segment, see Note 23 to the consolidated financial
Table of Contents


statements. Comparative financial information and discussion regarding the electric utility business segment can be found in Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)one segment).
The electric utility segment consists of KCP&L, a regulated utility, GMO's regulated utility operations and GMO Receivables Company. Electric utility Evergy serves approximately 855,7001,588,300 customers located in western MissouriKansas and eastern Kansas.Missouri. Customers include approximately 753,5001,392,500 residences, 99,700188,700 commercial firms and 2,5007,100 industrials, municipalities and other electric utilities. Electric utility's retail revenues averaged approximately 91% of its total operating revenues over the last three years. Wholesale firm power, bulk power sales and miscellaneous electric revenues accounted for the remainder of electric utility's revenues. Electric utilityEvergy is significantly impacted by seasonality with approximately one-third of its retail revenues recorded in the third quarter. Electric utility's total electric
Table of Contents


The table below summarizes the percentage of Evergy's revenues were 100%by customer classification.
 2018 2017 2016
Residential37% 32% 33%
Commercial32% 28% 29%
Industrial12% 16% 16%
Wholesale10% 12% 12%
Transmission7% 11% 9%
Other2% 1% 1%
Total100% 100% 100%
The table below summarizes the percentage of Evergy's retail electricity sales by customer class.
 2018 2017 2016
Residential37% 32% 33%
Commercial41% 38% 39%
Industrial22% 30% 28%
Total100% 100% 100%
Merger of Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy
Evergy was incorporated in 2017 as Monarch Energy Holding, Inc. (Monarch Energy), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Great Plains Energy). Prior to the closing of the merger transactions, Monarch Energy changed its name to Evergy and did not conduct any business activities other than those required for its formation and matters contemplated by the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar Energy, Monarch Energy and King Energy, Inc. (King Energy), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Monarch Energy (Amended Merger Agreement).
On June 4, 2018, Evergy completed the mergers contemplated by the Amended Merger Agreement. As a result of the mergers, Great Plains Energy merged into Evergy, with Evergy surviving the merger and King Energy merged into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving the merger. Following the completion of these mergers, Westar Energy and the direct subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy, including KCP&L and GMO, became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Evergy.
The merger was structured as a merger of equals in a tax-free exchange of shares that involved no premium paid or received with respect to either Great Plains Energy or Westar Energy. As a result of the closing of the merger transaction, each outstanding share of Great Plains Energy common stock was converted into 0.5981 shares of Evergy common stock and each outstanding share of Westar Energy common stock was converted into 1 share of Evergy common stock.
Westar Energy was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the merger and thus, the predecessor of Evergy. Therefore, Evergy's consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations of Westar Energy for 2017 and 2016 and the financial position of Westar Energy as of December 31, 2017. The results of Great Plains Energy's revenues overdirect subsidiaries have been included in Evergy's results of operations from the last three years. Electric utility's net income accounteddate of the closing of the merger and thereafter.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for approximately 101%, 105% and 100% of Great Plains Energy's net income in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.more information regarding the merger.
Regulation
Westar Energy and KCP&L&L's Kansas operations are regulated by the State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC) and KCP&L's Missouri operations and GMO are regulated by the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri (MPSC) and KCP&L is also regulated by The State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC), in each case with respect to retail rates, certain accounting matters, standards of service and, in certain cases, the issuance of securities, certification of facilities and service territories. KCP&L and GMOThe Evergy
Table of Contents


Companies are also subject to regulation by The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) with respect to transmission, wholesale sales and rates, and other matters. KCP&LEvergy has a 47%94% ownership interest in Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek), which is subject to regulation by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) with respect to licensing, operations and safety-related requirements.
The table below summarizes the rate orders in effect for Westar Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's retail rate jurisdictions.
RegulatorAllowed Return on EquityRate-Making Equity RatioRate Base (in billions)Effective DateRegulatorAllowed Return on EquityRate-Making Equity RatioEffective Date
Westar EnergyKCC9.3%51.46%September 2018
KCP&L KansasKCC9.3%49.09%December 2018
KCP&L MissouriMPSC9.5%50.09%$2.6September 2015MPSC(a)December 2018
KCP&L KansasKCC9.3%50.48%$2.1October 2015
GMOMPSC
9.5% - 9.75%(a)
(a)February 2017MPSC(a)December 2018
(a) KCP&L's and GMO's current MPSC rate order reflects a global settlement with an implied return on equity range of 9.5% - 9.75% and does not contain an agreed uponallowed return on equity or rate-making equity ratio or rate base.ratio.
MissouriEvergy expects its Kansas and KansasMissouri jurisdictional retail revenues averagedto be approximately 70%60% and 30%40%, respectively, based on historical averages of electric utility's totalWestar Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's retail revenues over the last three years.revenues.
See Item 7 MD&A, Critical Accounting Policies section, and Note 65 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information concerning regulatory matters.
Competition
Missouri and Kansas continue to operate on the fully integrated and regulated retail utility model. As a result, electric utility doesthe Evergy Companies do not compete with others to supply and deliver electricity in itstheir franchised service territory, although other sourcesterritories in exchange for agreeing to have their terms of energy can provide alternatives to retail electric utility customers.service regulated by state regulatory bodies. If Missouri or Kansas were to pass and implement legislation authorizing or mandating retail choice, electric utilityEvergy may no longer be able to apply regulated utility accounting principles to deregulated portions of its operations andwhich may be requiredrequire a surcharge to recover certain costs from legacy customers or could lead to a write off of certain regulatory assets and liabilities.
Electric utilityEvergy competes in the wholesale market to sell power in circumstances when the power it generates is not required for retail customers in its service territory. This competition primarily occurs within the SPP Integrated Marketplace, in which Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO are participants. Similar to other Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) or Independent System Operator (ISO) markets currently operating, thisThis marketplace determines which generating units among market participants should run, within the operating constraints of a unit, at any given time for maximum regional cost-effectiveness.
Table of Contents


In this regard, electric utility competes with owners of other generating stations and other power suppliers, principally other utilities within the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP)The SPP Integrated Marketplace onis similar to other Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) or Independent System Operator (ISO) markets currently operating in other regions of the basis of availability and price. Electric utility's wholesale revenues averaged approximately 7% of its total revenues over the last three years.United States.
Power Supply
Electric utilityEvergy has approximately 6,50014,500 MWs of owned generating capacity and alsorenewable purchased power agreements. Evergy's owned generation and purchased power from others, as a percentage of total MWhs generated and purchased, was approximately 71% and 29%, respectively, for 2018. Evergy purchases power to meet its customers' needs, to satisfy firm power commitments or to meet renewable energy standards. Electric utility's purchased power from others, as a percentage of MWh requirements, averaged approximately 24% over the last three years. Management believes electric utilityEvergy will be able to obtain enough power to meet its future purchased power demands due to the coordination of planning and operations in the SPP region and existing power purchase agreements; however, price and availability of power purchases may be impacted during periods of high demand.
Electric utility's
Table of Contents


Evergy's total capacity by fuel type, including both owned generating capacity and purchased power purchase agreements, is detailed in the table below.
Fuel TypeEstimated 2017 MW CapacityPercent of Total CapacityEstimated MW CapacityPercent of Total Capacity
Coal3,474
46
%5,890
40
%
Nuclear549
7
 
Natural gas and oil2,352
31
 3,991
27
 
Wind (a)
1,089
15
 3,442
24
 
Solar and hydroelectric (b)
65
1
 
Uranium1,104
8
 
Solar, landfill gas and hydroelectric (b)
75
1
 
Total capacity7,529
100
%14,502
100
%
(a)MWs are based on nameplate capacity of the wind facility. Includes owned generating capacity of 149579 MWs and long-term power purchase agreements of approximately 9402,863 MWs of wind generation whichthat expire in 20322028 through 2037. Power purchase agreements for approximately 300 MWs of wind generation to begin in late 2017 and expire in 2037 are not included in the table above.2048.
(b) Includes a long-term power purchase agreement for approximately 6066 MWs of hydroelectric generation whichthat expires in 2023.
Electric utility'sEvergy's projected peak summer demand for 20172019 is approximately 5,80010,350 MWs. Electric utilityEvergy expects to meet its projected capacity requirements for the foreseeable future with its existing generation assets and power and capacity purchases.
Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO are members of the SPP. The SPP is ana FERC-approved RTO mandated by FERCwith the responsibility to ensure reliable power supply, of power, adequate transmission infrastructure and competitive wholesale electricity prices of electricity.in the region. As SPP members, of the SPP,Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO are required to maintain a capacityminimum reserve margin of at least 12%. This net positive supply of capacity and energy is maintained through their generation assets,asset ownership, capacity agreements, power purchase agreements and peak demand reduction programs. The capacityreserve margin is designed to ensure thesupport reliability of the region's electric energy in the SPP region in the event of operational failure of power generating units utilized by the members of the SPP.
Table of Contents


supply.
Fuel
The principal fuel sources for electric utility'sEvergy's owned generation and purchased power agreements are coal, wind and nuclear fuel. It is expected, with normal weather, that approximately 97% of 2017 owned generation will come from theseother renewable sources, with the remainder provided by wind,uranium and natural gas and oil. The actual 2016 and estimated 20172018 fuel mix and deliveredfuel cost in cents per net kilowatt hour (kWh) generateddelivered are outlined in the following table.table and include full-year 2018 amounts for Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO.
       Fuel cost in cents per
 
Fuel Mix (a)
 net kWh generated
 Estimated Actual EstimatedActual
Fuel2017 2016  2017 2016
Coal76
% 79%  1.79
 1.84
Nuclear21
  17   0.64
 0.69
Natural gas and oil<1
  2   7.30
 13.65
Wind3
  2   
 
   Total owned generation100
% 100%  1.45
 1.46
(a) Fuel mix based on percent of net MWhs generated.
    Fuel cost in cents per
 
Fuel Mix(a)
 net kWh delivered
 Actual Actual
Fuel2018 2018
Coal55% $2.13
Wind, hydroelectric, landfill gas and solar(b)
23  0.01
Uranium17  0.61
Natural gas and oil5  3.81
   Total100% $1.78
(a) Fuel mix based on percent of net MWhs generated by owned resources and delivered under purchased power agreements.
(b) Fuel cost in cents per net kWh delivered does not include purchased power costs associated with renewable purchased power agreements. The actual 2018 fuel and purchased power cost in cents per net kWh delivered for wind, hydroelectric, landfill gas and solar was $2.87.
Coal
During 2017, electric utility's2019, Evergy's generating units, including jointly ownedjointly-owned units, are projected to burn approximately 1218 million tons of coal. Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO have entered into coal-purchase contracts with various suppliers in Wyoming's Powder River Basin (PRB), the nation's principal supply region of low-sulfur coal, and with local suppliers. The coal to be provided under these contracts is expected to satisfy approximately 100%80% of the projected coal requirements for 20172019 and approximately 48%55% for 2018.2020. The
Table of Contents


remainder of the coal requirements is expected to be fulfilled through entering into additional contracts or spot market purchases. KCP&L and GMO have entered into coal contracts over time at higher average prices affecting coal costs for 2017 and beyond.
Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO have also entered into rail transportation contracts with various railroads to transport coal from the PRB and local suppliers to their generating units. The transportation services to be provided under these contracts are expected to satisfy almost all of the projected transportation requirements for 20172019 and approximately 39% for 2018.2020. The contract rates adjust for changes in railroad costs.
Nuclear Fuel
Westar Energy and KCP&L each owns 47% of Wolf Creek, Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC), the operating company for Wolf Creek, which is electric utility'sEvergy's only nuclear generating unit. Wolf Creek purchases uranium and has it processed for use as fuel in its reactor. This process involves conversion of uranium concentrates to uranium hexafluoride, enrichment of uranium hexafluoride and fabrication of nuclear fuel assemblies. The owners of Wolf Creek have on hand or under contract all of the uranium, uranium enrichment and conversion services needed to operate Wolf Creek through March 2027. The owners also have under contract 97%all of the uranium enrichment and all of the fabrication required to operate Wolf Creek through March 2027September 2025.
Natural Gas
Natural gas accounted for approximately 8% of the total MMBtu of fuel consumed and September 2025, respectively.
See Note 5approximately 14% of total fuel expense in 2018. From time to time, Evergy may enter into contracts, including the consolidated financial statements foruse of derivatives, in an effort to manage the cost of natural gas. For additional information regarding nuclear plant.about our exposure to commodity price risks, see Item 7A., Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Westar Energy maintains natural gas transportation arrangements with Kansas Gas Service and Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline. The Kansas Gas Service agreement has historically expired on April 30 of each year and is renegotiated for an additional one-year term.
Environmental Matters
There have been political, legal and regulatory efforts to influence climate change, such as efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), impose a tax on emissions and create incentives for low-carbon generation and energy efficiency. These efforts, and climate change itself, have the potential to adversely affect the Evergy Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, for additional information.
The Evergy Companies have taken, and will continue to take, proactive measures to mitigate the impact of climate change on its businesses. For example, the Evergy Companies regularly conduct preparedness exercises for a variety of disruptive events, including storms, which may become more frequent or intense due to climate change. In addition, the Evergy Companies have invested, and will continue to invest, in grid resiliency. Much of the Evergy Companies' infrastructure is aged, and grid resiliency efforts include building additional transmission and distribution lines, replacing aged infrastructure and proactively managing the vegetation that can damage systems during severe weather. The Evergy Companies also monitor water conditions at their generating facilities, and focus on water conservation at these facilities to address resource depletion.
The Evergy Companies are committed to a long-term strategy to reduce carbon emissions in a cost-effective and reliable manner. Public attention is currently focused on reducing emissions and closing coal-fired generating units. Diversity of fuel supply has historically proven to provide benefits in terms of cost and reliability. In addition, the Evergy Companies must ensure that they prudently utilize the generation assets that regulators have allowed the Evergy Companies to include in rates and avoid "stranding" assets by prematurely closing facilities. The Evergy Companies use an integrated resource plan, which is a detailed analysis that estimates factors that influence the future supply and demand for electricity. The integrated resource plan considers forecasts of future electricity demand, fuel prices, transmission improvements, new generating capacity, integration of renewables, energy storage, energy efficiency and demand response initiatives. Strategies that the Evergy Companies have pursued include:
Table of Contents


retiring fossil fuel generation;
developing renewable energy facilities;
collaborating with regulators to offer customers the opportunity to procure electricity produced with renewable resources; and
investing in customer energy efficiency programs.
The Evergy Companies are also committed to transparency. On its website, www.evergyinc.com, Evergy provides quantitative and qualitative data regarding various environmental, social and governance matters, including information related to emissions, waste and water. The content of the website and report is not incorporated into this filing.
See Note 1514 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding environmental matters.
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Westar Energy, a Kansas corporation incorporated in 1924 and headquartered in Topeka, Kansas, is an integrated, regulated electric utility that engages in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. Westar Energy serves approximately 711,600 customers located in central and eastern Kansas. Customers include approximately 620,200 residences, 86,800 commercial firms, and 4,600 industrials, municipalities and other electric utilities. Westar Energy's retail revenues averaged approximately 76% of its total operating revenues over the last three years. Wholesale firm power, bulk power sales, transmission and miscellaneous electric revenues accounted for the remainder of Westar Energy's revenues. Westar Energy is significantly impacted by seasonality with approximately one-third of its retail revenues recorded in the third quarter.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
KCP&L, a Missouri corporation incorporated in 1922 and headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, is an integrated, regulated electric utility that engages in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. KCP&L serves approximately 534,400549,900 customers located in western Missouri and eastern Kansas. Customers include
Table of Contents


approximately 471,900485,300 residences, 60,50062,600 commercial firms, and 2,000 industrials, municipalities and other electric utilities. KCP&L's retail revenues averaged approximately 90%92% of its total operating revenues over the last three years. Wholesale firm power, bulk power sales and miscellaneous electric revenues accounted for the remainder of KCP&L's revenues. KCP&L is significantly impacted by seasonality with approximately one-third of its retail revenues recorded in the third quarter. Missouri and Kansas jurisdictional retail revenues for KCP&L averaged approximately 56%57% and 44%43%, respectively, of total retail revenues over the last three years.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L Employees
At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2018, the Evergy Companies had 2,8654,832 employees, including 1,7502,652 represented by threefive local unions of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW). Evergy also has a 94% ownership share in Wolf Creek, which has 889 employees, including 495 represented by a local union of the IBEW and a local union of the United Government Security Officers of America (UGSOA). Westar Energy has labor agreements with IBEW Locals 304 and 1523 (expires June 30, 2021). KCP&L has labor agreements with IBEW Local 1613, representing clerical employees (expires March 31, 2018)2021), with IBEW Local 1464, representing transmission and distribution workers (expires January 31, 2018)2021), and with IBEW Local 412, representing power plant workers (expires February 28, 2018)2021). Wolf Creek has labor agreements with IBEW Local 225 (expires September 20, 2021) and UGSOA Local 252 (expires July 31, 2020).
Table of Contents


Executive Officers
All of the individuals in the following table have been officers or employees in the responsible positions with the Company notedSet forth below for the past five years unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes.  The executive officers were reappointedis information relating to the indicated positions by the respective boards of directors, effective January 1, 2017, to hold such positions until their resignation, removal or the appointment of their successors. There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers nor any arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person involved in officer selection.of Evergy, Inc. Each executive officer holds the same position with GMOeach of Westar Energy, Inc., Kansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Gas and Electric Company and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company as he or she does with KCP&L.Evergy, Inc. Executive officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors. There are no family relationships among any of the executive officers, nor any arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and other persons pursuant to which he or she was appointed as an executive officer.
NameAgeCurrent Position(s)Year First Assumed an Officer Position
Terry Bassham (a)
56Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2005
Scott H. Heidtbrink (b)
55Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer - KCP&L2008
Kevin E. Bryant (c)
41Senior Vice President - Finance and Strategy and Chief Financial Officer - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2006
Steven P. Busser (d)
48Vice President - Risk Management and Controller - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2014
Charles A. Caisley (e)
44Vice President - Marketing and Public Affairs - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2011
Ellen E. Fairchild (f) 
55Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2010
Heather A. Humphrey (g) 
46Senior Vice President - Corporate Services and General Counsel - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2010
Darrin R. Ives (h)
47Vice President - Regulatory Affairs - KCP&L2013
Lori A. Wright (i) 
54Vice President - Corporate Planning, Investor Relations and Treasurer - Great Plains Energy and KCP&L2002
NameAgeCurrent Position(s)Year First Assumed an Officer Position*
Terry Bassham (a)
58President and Chief Executive Officer2005
Kevin E. Bryant (b)
43Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer2006
Gregory A. Greenwood (c)
53Executive Vice President, Strategy and Chief Administrative Officer2003
Anthony D. Somma (d)
55Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer2006
Jerl L. Banning (e)
57Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer2010
Heather A. Humphrey (f)
48Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary2010
Charles A. Caisley (g)
45Senior Vice President, Marketing and Public Affairs and Chief Customer Officer2011
Steven P. Busser (h)
50Vice President - Risk Management and Controller2014
*
Denotes the year in which the individual first assumed an officer position with any of Great Plains Energy, Westar Energy, KCP&L, KGE or GMO.
(a)Mr. Bassham was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Bassham served as Chairman of the Board in May 2013of Great Plains Energy (2013-2018), and hashad served as Chief Executive Officer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO since 2012. He has served as President of each company since 2011. He previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2011-2012) and as Executive Vice President - Utility Operations of KCP&L and GMO (2010-2011). He was Executive Vice President - Finance and Strategic Development and Chief Financial Officer of Great Plains Energy (2005-2010) and of KCP&L and GMO (2009-2010).

(b)
Mr. HeidtbrinkBryant was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of KCP&L and GMOEvergy, Inc. in 2012. HeJune 2018. Mr. Bryant previously served as Senior Vice President - Supply of KCP&L and GMO (2009-2012).  He was Senior Vice President - Corporate Services of KCP&L and GMO (2008), and Vice President - Power Generation & Energy Resources (2006-2008) of GMO.
Table of Contents



(c)
Mr. Bryant was appointed Vice President - Finance and Strategy and Chief Financial Officer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2015.(2015-2018). He previously served as Vice President - Strategic Planning of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2014). He served as Vice President - Investor Relations and Strategic Planning and Treasurer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2013). He served as Vice President - Investor Relations and Treasurer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2011-2013). He was Vice President - Strategy and Risk Management of KCP&L and GMO (2011) and Vice President - Energy Solutions (2006-2011) of KCP&L (2006-2011) and GMO.GMO (2008-2011).
(c)Mr. Greenwood was appointed Executive Vice President, Strategy and Chief Administrative Officer of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Greenwood previously served in the following officer roles for Westar Energy: Senior Vice President, Strategy (2011-2018); Vice President, Major Construction Projects (2006-2011); and Treasurer (2003-2006). Mr. Greenwood also served in the following roles for Westar Energy: Executive/Senior Director, Corporate Finance (1999-2003); Director, Financial Strategy and Acting Director, Internal Audit (1999-2000); and Director, Financial Strategy (1998-1999). Mr. Greenwood joined Westar Energy in 1993.
(d)Mr. Somma was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Somma previously served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (2011-2018) for Westar Energy, after having been appointed as Treasurer in 2006 and Vice President in 2009. He also served as Executive Director, Generation (2004-2006), Executive Director, Finance (1998-1999) and Director, Corporate Strategy (1996-1998) of Westar Energy, after having joined the company in 1994. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Somma served in various leadership roles with a former affiliate of Westar Energy, including Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.
Table of Contents


(d)
(e)
Mr. Banning was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Banning previously served in the following officer roles for Westar Energy: Senior Vice President, Operations Support and Administration (2015-2018); Vice President, Human Resources and IT (2014); and Vice President, Human Resources (2010- 2013). Mr. Banning also served as Executive Director of Human Resources for Westar Energy (2008-2010).
(f)Ms. Humphrey was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Ms. Humphrey previously served as Senior Vice President - Corporate Services and General Counsel of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2016-2018). She previously served as General Counsel (2010-2016) and Senior Vice President - Human Resources of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2012-2016). She served as Vice President - Human Resources of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2010-2012). She was Senior Director of Human Resources and Interim General Counsel of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2010) and Managing Attorney of KCP&L (2007-2010).
(g)Mr. Caisley was appointed Senior Vice President, Marketing and Public Affairs and Chief Customer Officer of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Caisley served as Vice President - Marketing and Public Affairs of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2011-2018). He was Senior Director of Public Affairs (2008-2011) and Director of Governmental Affairs of KCP&L (2007-2008).
(h)Mr. Busser was appointed Vice President - Risk Management and Controller of Evergy, Inc. in June 2018. Mr. Busser was appointed Vice President - Risk Management and Controller of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2016. He previously served as Vice President - Business Planning and Controller of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2014-2016). He served as Vice President - Treasurer of El Paso Electric Company (2011-2014). Prior to that, he served as Vice President - Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer (2006-2011) and Vice President - Regulatory Affairs and Treasurer (2004-2006) of El Paso Electric Company.

(e)
Mr. Caisley was appointed Vice President - Marketing and Public Affairs of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2011. He was Senior Director of Public Affairs (2008-2011) and Director of Governmental Affairs of KCP&L (2007-2008).

(f)
Ms. Fairchild was appointed Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2010.  She was Senior Director of Investor Relations and Assistant Secretary (2010) and Director of Investor Relations (2008-2010) of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO.  

(g)
Ms. Humphrey was appointed Senior Vice President - Corporate Services and General Counsel of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2016. She previously served as General Counsel (2010-2016) and Senior Vice President - Human Resources of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2012-2016).  She served as Vice President - Human Resources of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2010-2012). She was Senior Director of Human Resources and Interim General Counsel of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2010) and Managing Attorney of KCP&L (2007-2010).

(h)
Mr. Ives was appointed Vice President - Regulatory Affairs of KCP&L and GMO in 2013. He previously served as Senior Director - Regulatory Affairs of KCP&L and GMO (2011-2013). He was Assistant Controller of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2008 - 2011).

(i)
Ms. Wright was appointed Vice President - Corporate Planning, Investor Relations and Treasurer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in 2016. She previously served as Vice President - Investor Relations and Treasurer of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2014-2016). She served as Vice President - Business Planning and Controller of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO (2009-2014).  She was Controller of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L (2002-2008) and GMO (2008).

Available Information
Great Plains Energy's website is www.greatplainsenergy.com and KCP&L's website is www.kcpl.com. Information contained on these websites is not incorporated herein. The Companies make available, free of charge, on or through their websites, their annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the companies electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. In addition, the Companies make available on or through their websites all other reports, notifications and certifications filed electronically with the SEC.
The public may read and copy any materials that the Companies file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. For information on the operation of the Public Reference Room, please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding the Companies.
Investors should note that the Companies announce material financial information in SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls.  Based on guidance from the SEC, the Companies may use the Investor Relations section of Great Plains Energy's website (www.greatplainsenergy.com) to communicate with investors about Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.  It is possible that the financial and other information posted there could be deemed to be material information.  The information on Great Plains Energy's website is not part of this document.
Table of Contents


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Actual results in future periods for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L could differ materially from historical results and the forward-looking statements contained in this report.  The Companies' business is influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual results and are often beyond their control.  Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or that the Companies' management currently believes to be immaterial may also adversely affect the Companies.  This information, as well as the other information included in this report and in the other documents filed with the SEC, should be carefully considered before making an investment in the securities of Great Plains Energy or KCP&L.  Risk factors of KCP&L are also risk factors of Great Plains Energy.
Risks Relating to the Anticipated Acquisition of Westar:
The ability of Great Plains Energy and Westar to complete the merger is subject to various closing conditions, including the receipt of consents and approvals from governmental authorities, which may impose conditions that could adversely affect Great Plains Energy or cause the merger to be abandoned.
To complete the merger, each of Great Plains Energy and Westar must make certain filings with and obtain certain consents and approvals from various governmental and regulatory authorities.

Great Plains Energy and Westar have not yet obtained all of the regulatory consents and approvals required to complete the merger. Governmental or regulatory agencies could seek to block or challenge the merger or could impose restrictions they deem necessary or desirable in the public interest as a condition to approving the merger. Great Plains Energy and Westar will be unable to complete the merger until the necessary consents and approvals are received from FERC, the NRC, KCC, and the MPSC (collectively referred to as the required governmental approvals). The Merger Agreement may require Great Plains Energy and/or Westar to accept conditions from these regulators that could adversely impact the combined company. If the required governmental approvals are not received, or they are not received on terms that satisfy the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, then neither Great Plains Energy nor Westar will be obligated to complete the merger.

In addition, governmental authorities could seek to block or challenge the merger, including after closing, as they deem necessary or desirable in the public interest. In some jurisdictions, a private party could initiate an action under the antitrust laws challenging or seeking to enjoin the merger, before or after it is completed. Great Plains Energy or Westar may not prevail and may incur significant costs in defending or settling any action under the antitrust laws.

FERC Commissioner Norman Bay's resignation, effective February 3, 2017, left FERC with two sitting commissioners and the inability to convene a quorum. Without a quorum, FERC cannot issue certain orders on contested cases, including Great Plains Energy's and Westar's merger application. If a replacement commissioner is not appointed and confirmed in a timely fashion, the closing of the merger could be delayed until such time that a replacement commissioner is approved by the Senate.

The September 2016 special meetings at which the Great Plains Energy shareholders and the Westar shareholders approved the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement have taken place before all required approvals have been obtained and, in certain cases, before the terms of any conditions to obtain such required approvals are known. As a result, Great Plains Energy and Westar may make decisions after the special meetings to waive a condition or approve certain actions required to obtain necessary approvals without seeking further shareholder approval. Such actions could have an adverse effect on the combined company.

In addition, the Merger Agreement contains other customary conditions to the closing of the merger, each of which must be satisfied or waived in order to complete the merger.

If Great Plains Energy and Westar are unable to complete the merger, Great Plains Energy would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:

Table of Contents


Great Plains Energy would not realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, including, among other things, increased operating efficiencies and future cost savings;
the attention of management of Great Plains Energy may have been diverted to the merger rather than to its own operations and the pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to the Company;
the potential loss of key personnel during the pendency of the merger as employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company; and
the trading price of Great Plains Energy common stock may decline to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the merger will be completed.
Great Plains Energy will be required to pay Westar a termination fee of $380 million if the Merger Agreement is terminated due to a failure to receive the required governmental approvals or a failure to receive them on terms and conditions that would not result in a material adverse effect on Great Plains Energy and its subsidiaries, after giving effect to the merger.

We can provide no assurance that the various closing conditions will be satisfied and that the required governmental approvals will be obtained, or that any required conditions will not materially adversely affect the combined company following the merger. In addition, we can provide no assurance that these conditions will not result in the abandonment or delay of the merger. The occurrence of any of these events individually or in combination could have a material adverse effect on Great Plains Energy's results of operations and the trading price of Great Plains Energy common stock.

The Merger Agreement contains provisions that limit Great Plains Energy's or Westar's ability to pursue alternatives to the merger, could discourage a potential competing acquirer of either Great Plains Energy or Westar from making a favorable alternative transaction proposal and, in certain circumstances, could require Westar or Great Plains Energy to pay a termination fee to the other party.
Under the Merger Agreement, Westar and Great Plains Energy each are restricted from entering into alternative merger or acquisition transactions. Unless and until the Merger Agreement is terminated, subject to specified exceptions, each party is restricted from soliciting, initiating or knowingly encouraging, inducing or facilitating, or participating in any discussions or negotiations with any person regarding, or cooperating in any way with any person with respect to, any alternative proposal or any inquiry or proposal that would reasonably be expected to lead to an alternative proposal. Under certain circumstances either Westar or Great Plains Energy may be required to pay a termination fee to the other if they were to enter into an alternative transaction within twelve months of a termination of the Merger Agreement. These provisions could discourage a third party that may have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of Westar or Great Plains Energy from considering or proposing that acquisition, including under circumstances in which the Merger Agreement would be terminated on a separate basis, even if such third party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share cash or market value than the market value proposed to be received or realized in the merger. As a result of these restrictions, neither Westar nor Great Plains Energy may be able to enter into an agreement with respect to a more favorable alternative transaction without incurring potentially significant liability to the other.

Great Plains Energy and Westar will be subject to various uncertainties while the merger is pending that may cause disruption and may make it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees, suppliers, or customers.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees, suppliers and customers may have an adverse effect on Great Plains Energy and Westar. Although Great Plains Energy and Westar intend to take steps designed to reduce any adverse effects, these uncertainties may impair the ability of Great Plains Energy or Westar to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed and for a period of time thereafter, and could cause customers, suppliers and others that deal with Great Plains Energy or Westar to seek to change or terminate existing business relationships with Great Plains Energy or Westar or not enter into new relationships or transactions.

Table of Contents


Employee retention and recruitment may be particularly challenging prior to the completion of the merger, as employees and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company. If, despite Great Plains Energy's and Westar's retention and recruiting efforts, key employees depart or fail to continue employment with either company because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the combined company, Great Plains Energy's and/or Westar's financial results could be adversely affected. Furthermore, the combined company's operational and financial performance following the merger could be adversely affected if it is unable to retain key employees and skilled workers of Great Plains Energy and Westar. The loss of the services of key employees and skilled workers and their experience and knowledge regarding Great Plains Energy's and Westar's businesses could adversely affect the combined company's future operating results and the successful ongoing operation of its businesses.
Failure to successfully combine the businesses of Great Plains Energy and Westar in the expected time frame may adversely affect the future results of the combined company, and, consequently, the value of Great Plains Energy common stock.
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on the ability of Great Plains Energy to realize the anticipated benefits and efficiencies from combining the businesses of Great Plains Energy and Westar. To realize these anticipated benefits, the businesses must be successfully combined. If the combined company is not able to achieve these objectives, or is not able to achieve these objectives on a timely basis, the anticipated benefits of the transactions may not be realized fully or at all. In addition, the actual integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses, which could reduce the anticipated benefits of the merger. These integration difficulties could result in a decline in the market value of Great Plains Energy common stock.

Failure to complete the merger, or significant delays in completing the merger, could negatively affect the trading prices of Great Plains Energy common stock and the future business and financial results of Great Plains Energy.
Completion of the merger is not assured and is subject to risks, including the risk that approval of the merger by governmental agencies is not obtained or that other closing conditions are not satisfied. If the merger is not completed, or if there are significant delays in completing the merger, it could negatively affect the trading price of Great Plains Energy common stock and the future business and financial results of Great Plains Energy. Great Plains Energy also will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Great Plains Energy may be liable for damages to Westar under the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement;
negative reactions from the financial markets, including declines in the price of Great Plains Energy common stock due to the fact that current prices may reflect a market assumption that the merger will be completed;
having to pay certain significant costs relating to the merger, including, in certain circumstances, a termination fee; and
the attention of Great Plains Energy will have been diverted to the merger rather than Great Plains Energy's own operations and pursuit of other opportunities that could have been beneficial to Great Plains Energy.
Each of Great Plains Energy and Westar will incur significant transaction and merger-related costs in connection with the merger.
Great Plains Energy and Westar have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, costs associated with combining the operations of the two companies, as well as transaction fees and other costs related to the merger. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of the businesses of Great Plains Energy and Westar. Although Great Plains Energy and Westar expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, may offset incremental transaction, merger-related and restructuring costs over time, any net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.

Table of Contents


Great Plains Energy may be unable to obtain the anticipated combination of financing or the necessary amount of financing to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration.
Great Plains Energy intends to finance the cash portion of the merger consideration with a combination of cash on hand and the proceeds from the issuance of a combination of common stock, mandatory convertible preferred stock and debt securities. In October 2016, Great Plains Energy completed registered public offerings of 60.5 million shares of common stock for total net proceeds of $1.55 billion and 17.3 million depositary shares each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's 7.00% Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock) for total net proceeds of $836.2 million.

To the extent the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's remaining expected securities issuances are not available on or before the closing date of the merger, or are in insufficient amounts, Great Plains Energy may use borrowings under its bridge term loan facility to fund the remaining portion of the cash consideration for the merger. However, the availability of funds under the bridge term loan facility is subject to certain conditions including, among others, the absence of a material adverse effect with respect to Westar and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the accuracy of certain representations and warranties and the absence of certain defaults with respect to indebtedness of Great Plains Energy and its subsidiaries.

If Great Plains Energy is required to obtain more debt financing than anticipated, whether through the issuance of debt securities or borrowings under the bridge term loan facility, the required regulatory approvals to complete the merger may be more difficult to obtain and the combined company's credit ratings and ability to service its debt could be adversely affected.

Current Great Plains Energy shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the merger and will exercise less influence over management of the combined company.
Great Plains Energy has already issued approximately 60.5 million shares of common stock in order to raise proceeds to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the merger. Furthermore, Great Plains Energy issued in October 2016 and also expects to issue at the time of the merger, shares of mandatorily convertible preferred stock, which shall ultimately convert into common stock. In connection with the completion of the merger, Great Plains Energy will also issue up to approximately 45 million shares of Great Plains Energy common stock to Westar shareholders in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Great Plains Energy shareholders currently have the right to vote for the Company's board of directors and on other matters affecting Great Plains Energy. When the merger occurs, each Westar shareholder that receives shares of Great Plains Energy common stock will become a shareholder of Great Plains Energy with a percentage ownership of the combined company that is significantly smaller than the shareholder's percentage ownership in Westar. Correspondingly, each Great Plains Energy shareholder will remain a shareholder of Great Plains Energy with a percentage ownership of the combined company that is smaller than the shareholder's percentage ownership of Great Plains Energy prior to the merger.

As a result of these securities issuances and reduced ownership percentages, current Great Plains Energy shareholders will have less influence on the management and policies of the combined company than they now have with respect to Great Plains Energy.

The market price of Great Plains Energy common stock after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the shares of Great Plains Energy or Westar currently.
Upon completion of the merger, the businesses of the combined company will differ from those of Great Plains Energy and Westar prior to the merger in important respects and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of Great Plains Energy's shares of common stock following the merger may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of Great Plains Energy and Westar.

Table of Contents


There are risks associated with the mandatory convertible preferred stock Great Plains Energy expects to issue pursuant to its stock purchase agreement with OMERS to finance a portion of the merger consideration.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy entered into a stock purchase agreement with OCM Credit Portfolio LP (OMERS) pursuant to which Great Plains Energy will issue and sell to OMERS $750 million of 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (Series A Preferred Stock) upon the consummation of the merger. Upon entering into the stock purchase agreement, Great Plains Energy paid OMERS $15 million, which is not refundable in the event the merger is not consummated. The terms of the Series A Preferred Stock will provide that if Great Plains Energy misses two quarterly dividend payments, Great Plains Energy would be required to appoint two representatives designated by OMERS to the Great Plains Energy Board. In addition, OMERS' non-U.S. based ownership could potentially complicate obtaining the required regulatory approvals for the merger.

The combined company's indebtedness following the merger will be greater than Great Plains Energy's existing indebtedness. As a result, it may be more difficult for the combined company to pay or refinance its debts or take other actions, and the combined company may need to divert its cash flow from operations to debt service payments.
In connection with the merger, Great Plains Energy will incur additional debt to pay the cash portion of the merger consideration and transaction expenses and the indebtedness of the combined company will include Westar's outstanding debt. The combined company's debt service obligations with respect to this increased indebtedness could have an adverse impact on its earnings and cash flows, which after the merger would include the earnings and cash flows of Westar, for as long as the indebtedness is outstanding.

The combined company's increased indebtedness could also have important consequences to holders of Great Plains Energy securities. For example, it could:

make it more difficult for the combined company to pay or refinance its debts as they become due during adverse economic and industry conditions because any decrease in revenues could cause the combined company to not have sufficient cash flows from operations to make its scheduled debt payments;
limit the combined company's flexibility to pursue other strategic opportunities or react to changes in its business and the industry in which it operates and, consequently, place the combined company at a competitive disadvantage to its competitors with less debt;
require a substantial portion of the combined company's cash flows from operations to be used for debt service payments, thereby reducing the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividend payments and other general corporate purposes;
result in a downgrade in the rating of the combined company's indebtedness, which could limit its ability to borrow additional funds or increase the interest rates applicable to its indebtedness (after the announcement of the merger, Moody's Investors Service placed its long-term ratings of Great Plains Energy on review for downgrade and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised the outlook of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO from stable to negative);
result in higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates since some of Great Plains Energy's borrowings are, and will continue to be, at variable rates of interest; or
require that additional terms, conditions or covenants be placed on Great Plains Energy.
Based upon current levels of operations, Great Plains Energy expects to be able to generate sufficient cash on a consolidated basis to make all of the principal and interest payments when such payments are due under Great Plains Energy's and its current subsidiaries' existing credit facilities, indentures and other instruments governing their outstanding indebtedness, and under the indebtedness of Westar and its subsidiaries that may remain outstanding after the merger; but there can be no assurance that the combined company will be able to repay or refinance such borrowings and obligations.

Table of Contents


Great Plains Energy is committed to maintaining its credit ratings. In order to maintain these credit ratings, Great Plains Energy may consider it appropriate to reduce the amount of indebtedness outstanding following the merger. This may be accomplished in several ways, including issuing additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into shares of common stock, reducing discretionary uses of cash or a combination of these and other measures. Issuances of additional shares of common stock or securities convertible into shares of common stock would have the effect of diluting the ownership percentage that current Great Plains Energy shareholders and former Westar shareholders hold in the combined company and might reduce the reported earnings per share. Any potential issuances could be adversely impacted by movements in the overall equity markets or the utility sector of the market and ultimately impact any offering price. The specific measures that Great Plains Energy may ultimately decide to use to maintain or improve its credit ratings and their timing will depend upon a number of factors, including market conditions and forecasts at the time those decisions are made.

The combined company will record goodwill that could become impaired and adversely affect the combined company's operating results.
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition by Great Plains Energy in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of Westar will be recorded, as of completion, at their respective fair values and added to those of Great Plains Energy. The reported financial condition and results of operations of Great Plains Energy issued after completion of the merger will reflect Westar balances and results after completion of the merger, but will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Westar for periods prior to the merger.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, the total purchase price will be allocated to Westar's tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets based on their fair values as of the date of completion of the merger. The fair value of Westar's tangible and intangible assets and liabilities subject to the rate setting practices of their regulators approximate their carrying values. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values will be recorded as goodwill. Great Plains Energy expects that the merger will result in the creation of goodwill based upon the application of the acquisition method of accounting. To the extent the value of goodwill or intangibles becomes impaired, the combined company may be required to incur material charges relating to such impairment. Such a potential impairment charge could have a material impact on the combined company's operating results.

The anticipated benefits of combining Great Plains Energy and Westar may not be realized.
Great Plains Energy and Westar entered into the Merger Agreement with the expectation that the merger would result in various benefits, including, among other things, increased operating efficiencies. Although Great Plains Energy and Westar expect to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger, achieving them is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:

whether United States federal and state public utility, antitrust and other regulatory authorities whose approval is required to complete the merger impose conditions on the merger, which may have an adverse effect on the combined company, including its ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger;
the ability of the two companies to combine certain of their operations or take advantage of expected growth opportunities;
general market and economic conditions;
general competitive factors in the marketplace; and
higher than expected costs required to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
No assurance can be given that these benefits will be achieved or, if achieved, the timing of their achievement. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased costs and decreases in the amount of expected revenues or net income of the combined company.

Table of Contents


The merger may not be accretive to earnings and may cause dilution to Great Plains Energy's earnings per share, which may negatively affect the market price of Great Plains Energy common stock.
Great Plains Energy currently anticipates that the merger will be neutral to Great Plains Energy's forecasted earnings per share on a stand-alone basis in the first full calendar year after closing increasing to approximately a 10 percent accretion in the third full calendar year after closing. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates, which may materially change. Great Plains Energy may encounter additional transaction and integration-related costs, may fail to realize all of the benefits anticipated in the merger or be subject to other factors that affect preliminary estimates or its ability to realize operational efficiencies. Any of these factors could cause a decrease in Great Plains Energy's earnings per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the merger and contribute to a decrease in the price of Great Plains Energy's common stock.

The merger will combine two companies that are currently affected by developments in the electric utility industry, including changes in regulation and increased competition. A failure to adapt to the changing regulatory environment after the merger could adversely affect the stability of the combined company's earnings and could result in the erosion of its market positions, revenues and profits.
Because Great Plains Energy, Westar and their respective subsidiaries are regulated in the U.S. at the federal level and in several states, the two companies have been and will continue to be affected by legislative and regulatory developments. After the merger, the combined company and/or its subsidiaries will be subject in the U.S. to extensive federal regulation as well as to state regulation in Missouri and Kansas. Each of these jurisdictions has implemented, is in the process of implementing or possibly will implement changes to the regulatory and legislative framework applicable to the electric utility industry. These changes could have a material adverse effect on the combined company.

The costs and burdens associated with complying with these regulatory jurisdictions may have a material adverse effect on the combined company. Moreover, potential legislative changes, regulatory changes or otherwise may create greater risks to the stability of utility earnings generally. If the combined company is not responsive to these changes, it could suffer erosion in market position, revenues and profits as competitors gain access to the service territories of its utility subsidiaries.

The market value of Great Plains Energy common stock could decline if large amounts of its common stock are sold in anticipation of or following the merger.
Following the merger, shareholders of Great Plains Energy and former shareholders of Westar will own interests in a combined company operating an expanded business with more assets and a different mix of liabilities. Current shareholders of Great Plains Energy and Westar may not wish to continue to invest in the combined company, or may wish to reduce their investment in the combined company, in order to comply with institutional investing guidelines, to increase diversification or to track any rebalancing of stock indices in which Great Plains Energy or Westar common stock is or was included. If, before or following the merger, large amounts of Great Plains Energy common stock are sold, the price of its common stock could decline.
Utility Regulatory Risks:
Complex utility regulation could adversely affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The CompaniesPrices are subject to regulatory review and may not prove adequate to recover costs or affected by, extensive federal and state utility regulation, including regulation by the MPSC, KCC, FERC, NRC, North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) and SPP.  The Companies must address in their business planning and management of operations the effects of existing and proposed laws and regulations and potential changes in the regulatory framework, including initiatives by federal and state legislatures, RTOs, utility regulators and taxing authorities.  Failure of the Companies to obtain adequate rates or regulatory approvals inprovide a timely manner, new or changed laws, regulations, standards, interpretations or other legal requirements, deterioration of the Companies' relationship with regulators and increased compliance costs and potential non-compliance consequences may materially affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  Additionally, regulators may impose burdensome restrictions and conditions on the
Table of Contents


Companies' transactions and ventures, rendering them less attractive from a financial or operational perspective. Certain of these risks are addressed in greater detail below.fair return.
The outcome of retail rate proceedings could have a material impact onprices that the business and is largely outside the Companies' control.
The rates that KCP&L and GMOEvergy Companies are allowed to charge their customers significantly influence the Companies'their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  These ratesprices are subject to the determination, in large part, of governmental entities, outside of the Companies' control, including the MPSC, KCC and FERC.
The utility rate-setting principle generally applicableIn general, utilities are allowed to KCP&L and GMO is that rates should providerecover costs (including a reasonable opportunity to recover expenses and investmentsreturn on invested capital) that were prudently incurred to provide utility service plus a reasonable return onservice.  There can be no assurance, however, that regulators will determine such investments.  Various expenses incurred by KCP&L and GMOcosts to have been excluded from ratesprudently incurred. Further, the amounts approved by the MPSC and KCC in past rate cases as not being prudently incurred or not providing utility customer benefit, and there is a risk that certain expenses incurred in the futureregulators may not be recovered in rates. Third-parties often intervene insufficient to allow for a recovery of costs or provide for an adequate return on and of capital investments. Also, amounts that were approved by regulators may be modified, limited or eliminated by regulatory or legislative actions. Any decisions made by these regulators could have a material adverse effect on the utilities' rate casesresults of operations, financial condition and argue that certain costs have not been prudently incurred or are otherwise not recoverable in rates.  The MPSCcash flows of Evergy and KCC also have in the past and may in the future exclude from rates all or a portion of investments in various facilities as not being prudently incurred or not being useful in providingits utility service.  
As discussed in the "Environmental Risks" and "Financial Risks" sections below, the Companies' capital expenditures are expected to be substantial over the next several years and there is a risk that a portion of the capital costs could be excluded from rates in future rate cases.subsidiaries.
The Evergy Companies are also exposed to cost-recovery shortfalls due to the inherent "regulatory lag" in the rate-setting process, especially during periods of significant cost inflation or declining retail usage, as KCP&L's and GMO'sprocess. This is because utility rates are generally based on historical information and, except for certain situations where regulators allow for recovery of expenses through use of a formula that tracks costs, are not subject to adjustment between rate cases, other than principallycases. In connection with the merger, Westar Energy and KCP&L agreed to a five-year base rate moratorium in Kansas beginning in December 2018. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for fuel, purchased power, transmissionadditional information. In addition, effective as of January 1, 2019, KCP&L and property taxesGMO elected into plant-in service accounting (PISA), which, by law, requires each company to keep base rates constant for three years following KCP&L in Kansas; fuel, purchased power, certain transmission costs&L's and demand-side investmentsGMO's last general rate case. See Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Executive Summary for KCP&L in Missouri; and fuel, purchased power, certain transmission costs, demand-side investments and renewable energy (solar rebates) for GMO.additional information on PISA. These and other factors may result in under-recovery of costs or failure to earn the authorized return on investment, or both.
Failure to timely recover the full investment costs of capital projects, the impact of renewable energy and energy efficiency programs, other utility costs and expenses due to regulatory disallowances, regulatory lag or other factors
Table of Contents


could lead to lowered credit ratings, reduced access to capital markets, increased financing costs, lower flexibility due to constrained financial resources and increased collateral security requirements or reductions or delays in planned capital expenditures.  In response to competitive, economic, political, legislative, public perception (including, but not limited to, the Companies' environmental reputation) and regulatory pressures, the CompaniesEvergy and its utility subsidiaries may be subject to rate moratoriums, rate refunds, limits on rate increases, lower allowed returns on investments or rate reductions, including phase-in plans designed to spread the impact of rate increases over an extended period of time for the benefit of customers. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Evergy Companies.
Regulatory requirements regarding utility operations may increase costs and may expose the Evergy Companies to compliance penalties or adverse rate consequences.
The FERC, NERCthe North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) and SPP have implemented and enforce an extensive set of transmission system reliability, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection standards that apply to public utilities, including KCP&L and GMO.utilities.  The MPSC and KCC have the authority to implement utility operational standards and requirements, such as vegetation management standards, facilities inspection requirements and quality of service standards.  In addition, the Companies areEvergy is also subject to health, safety and other requirements enacted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Labor and other federal and state agencies.  As discussed more fully under "Operational Risks," the NRC extensively regulates nuclear power plants, including Wolf Creek. The costs of complying with existing, new or modified regulations, standards and other requirements could have ana material adverse
Table of Contents


effect on the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows as a result of increased operations or maintenance and capital expenditures for new facilities or to repair or improve existing facilities.the Evergy Companies.  In addition, failure to meet quality of service, reliability, cybersecurity, critical infrastructure protection, operational or other standards and requirements could expose the Evergy Companies to penalties, additional compliance costs or adverse rate consequences.
Tax Reform Risk:

Changes in federal income tax policy could negatively impact the Companies.
The Companies are impacted by the U.S. federal income tax policy, including corporate income tax laws. Both the new federal administration and the Republicans in the Houseconsequences, any of Representatives have made public statements in support of comprehensive tax reform, including significant changes in the U.S. corporate income tax laws. These proposed changes include, among other things, a reduction in the corporate income tax rate, the immediate deductibility of 100% of capital expenditures, and the elimination of the interest expense deduction. The Companies are currently unable to predict whether these reform discussions will result in any significant changes to existing tax laws, or if any such changes would have a cumulative positive or negative impact on the Companies. However, it is possible that changes in the U.S. federal income tax lawswhich could have a material adverse effectimpact on the Companies'their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Environmental Risks:
Costs to comply with environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to GHG emissions, are and may continue to be significant and may adversely impact operations and financial results.
The Evergy Companies are subject to currentextensive and potential environmental requirements and the incurrence of environmental liabilities, any or all of which may adversely affect their business and financial results.
The Companies are subject to extensivefrequently changing federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and permit requirements relating to air and water quality, waste management and hazardous substance disposal, protected natural resources (such as wetlands, endangered species and other protected wildlife) and health and safety.  In additionFor example, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO combust large amounts of fossil fuels in the production of electricity, which results in significant emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs. Federal legislation regulates the emission of GHGs and numerous states and regions have adopted programs to imposing continuing compliance obligationsstabilize or reduce GHG emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Kansas Department of Health and remediation costsEnvironment (KDHE) and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) regulate emissions under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA), water under the Clean Water Act (CWA) and waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), among other laws and regulations. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for historical and pre-existing conditions,additional information.
Compliance with these laws, regulations and permits authorizerequirements entails significant capital and operating resources, and the failure to comply could result in the imposition of substantial penalties, for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions.  There is also a risk that new environmental laws and regulations, new administrative or judicial interpretations of environmental laws and regulations, or the requirements in new or renewed environmental permits could adversely affect the Companies' operations.  In addition, there is also a risk of lawsuits brought by third parties alleging violations of environmental commitmentslaws, regulations or requirements, claiming creation of a public nuisance or other matters, and seeking injunctions or monetary damages or other damages.relief. Certain federal courts have held that state and local governments and private parties have standing to bring climate change tort suits seeking company-specific emission reductions and damages.
Environmental permits are subject to periodic renewal, which may result in more stringent permit conditions and limits.  New facilities, or modifications of existing facilities, may require new environmental permits or amendments to existing permits.  Delays in the environmental permitting process, public opposition and challenges, denials of permit applications, limits or conditions imposed in permits and the associated uncertainty may materially adversely affect the cost and timing of projects, and thus materially adversely affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.flows of the Evergy Companies. In addition, compliance with environmental laws,
KCP&L
Table of Contents


regulations and GMO periodically seekrequirements could alter the way assets are managed, which in turn could result in retiring assets earlier than expected, recording asset retirement obligations (AROs) or having a regulator disallow recovery of capital costs and expenses for environmental compliance and remediation through rate increases; however, there can be no assurance that recovery of these costs would be granted.  KCP&L and GMO may be subject to material adverse rate treatmenthad been prudently incurred in response to competitive, economic, political, legislative or regulatory pressures and/or public perception of the Companies' environmental reputation. The costsconnection with those assets.
Costs of compliance or noncompliance with environmental laws, regulations and requirements, remediation costs, adverseor fines, penalties or negative lawsuit outcomes, of lawsuits, or failure to timely recover environmental costsif not recovered in rates from customers, could have a material adverse effect on the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  Certain of these matters are discussed in more detail below.  See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding certain significant environmental matters and Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's current estimates of capital expenditures to comply with environmental regulations.
Table of Contents


Air and Climate Change
The Companies' current generation capacity is primarily coal-fired, and is estimated to produce about one ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) per MWh, or approximately 19 million tons and 15 million tons of CO2 per year for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, respectively. Management believes it is possible that additional federal or relevant state or local laws or regulations could be enacted to address global climate change.  At the international level, in December 2015 the Paris Agreement was adopted by nearly 200 countries and became effective in November 2016 as the threshold of at least 55 countries representing at least 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions have joined it through ratification. The Paris Agreement does not result in any new, legally binding obligations on the United States to meet a particular greenhouse gas emissions target, but establishes a framework for international cooperation on climate change.  Other international agreements legally binding on the United States may be reached in the future.  Such new laws, regulations or treaties could mandate new or increased requirements to control or reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, such as CO2, which are created in the combustion of fossil fuels.  These requirements could include, among other things, taxes or fees on fossil fuels or emissions, cap and trade programs, emission limits and clean or renewable energy standards.  
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has enacted various regulations regarding the reporting and permitting of greenhouse gases and has proposed other regulations under the existing Clean Air Act.  The EPA has established thresholds for greenhouse gas emissions, defining when Clean Air Act permits under the New Source Performance Standards, New Source Review and Title V operating permits programs would be required for new or existing industrial facilities and when the installation of best available control technology would be required.   In August 2015, the EPA finalized its Clean Power Plan which sets CO2 emission performance rates for existing affected fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.  Specifically, the EPA translated those performance rates into a state goal measured in mass and rate based on each state’s generation mix.  The states have the ability to develop their own plans for affected units to achieve either the performance rates directly or the state goals, with guidelines for the development, submittal and implementation of those plans.  In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stayflows of the Clean Power Plan putting the rule on hold pending review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and any subsequent review by the U.S. Supreme Court if such review is sought.  Compliance with the Clean Power Plan has the potential of having significant financial and operational impacts on Great Plains Energy and KCP&L; however, the ultimate financial and operational consequences to Great Plains Energy and KCP&L cannot be determined until the outcome of pending litigation is known and/or the state plans to implement the Clean Power Plan are known. Additional federal and/or state legislation or regulation respecting greenhouse gas emissions may be proposed or enacted in the future.  Requirements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may cause the Companies to incur significant costs relating to their ongoing operations (such as for additional environmental control equipment, retiring and replacing existing generation, re-powering existing plants to utilize alternative fuel or selecting more costly generation alternatives), to procure emission allowance credits, or due to the imposition of taxes, fees or other governmental charges as a result of such emissions.
Water
The Clean Water Act and associated regulations enacted by the EPA form a comprehensive program to restore and preserve water quality.  All of the Companies' generating facilities, and certain of their other facilities, are subject to the Clean Water Act.
In May 2014, the EPA finalized regulations regarding protection of aquatic life from being killed or injured by cooling water intake structures. KCP&L’s generation facilities with cooling water intake structures are subject to the best technology available standards based on studies completed to comply with such standards. The rule provides flexibility to work with the states to develop the best technology available to minimize aquatic species impacted by being pinned against intake screens or drawn into cooling water systems.
KCP&L holds a permit from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) covering water discharge from its Hawthorn Station.  The permit authorizes KCP&L to, among other things, withdraw
Table of Contents


water from the Missouri River for cooling purposes and return the heated water to the Missouri River.  KCP&L has applied for a renewal of this permit and the EPA has submitted an interim objection letter regarding the allowable amount of heat that can be contained in the returned water.  Until this matter is resolved, KCP&L continues to operate under its current permit. Future water permit renewals at KCP&L's Iatan Station and at GMO's Sibley and Lake Road Stations could also be impacted by the allowable amount of heat that can be contained in the returned water.  Great Plains Energy and KCP&L cannot predict the outcome of these matters; however, while less significant outcomes are possible, these matters may require a reduction in generation, installation of cooling towers or other technology to cool the water, or both, any of which could have a significant impact on Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  
In September 2015, the EPA finalized a revision of the technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and standards regulation to make the existing controls on discharges from steam electric power plants more stringent.  The final rule sets the first federal limits on the levels of toxic metals in wastewater that can be discharged from power plants.  The new requirements for existing power plants would be phased in between 2018 and 2023.
Further, the possible effects of climate change, including potentially increased temperatures and reduced precipitation, could make it more difficult and costly to comply with the current and final permit requirements.
Solid Waste
Solid and hazardous waste generation, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal are regulated at the federal and state levels under various laws and regulations.  In April 2015, the EPA published final regulations to regulate coal combustion residuals (CCRs) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D to address the risks from the disposal of CCRs generated from the combustion of coal at electric generating facilities. The Companies principally use coal in generating electricity and dispose of CCRs in both on-site facilities and facilities owned by third parties.  Current and future EPA regulations regarding the handling, disposal and remediation of CCRs could have a material adverse effect on the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Remediation
Under current law, the Companies are also generally responsible for any liabilities associated with the environmental condition of their properties and other properties at which the Companies arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances, including properties that they have previously owned or operated, such as manufactured gas plants (MGP), regardless of whether they were responsible for the contamination or whether the liabilities arose before, during or after the time they owned or operated the properties or arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances.
Due to all of the above, the Companies' projected capital and other expenditures for environmental compliance are subject to significant uncertainties, including the timing of implementation of any new or modified environmental requirements, the limits imposed by such requirements and the types and costs of the compliance alternatives selected by theEvergy Companies.  As a result, costs to comply with environmental requirements cannot be estimated with certainty, and actual costs could be significantly higher than projections.  New environmental laws and regulations affecting the operations of the Companies may be adopted, and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to the Companies or their facilities, any of which may materially adversely affect the Companies' business, adversely affect the Companies' ability to continue operating its power plants as currently done and substantially increase environmental expenditures or liabilities in the future.
Table of Contents


Financial Risks:
Financial market disruptions andor declines in the Evergy Companies' credit ratings may increase financing costs and/or limit access to the credit markets, which may adversely affect liquidity and results.
The Companies' capital requirements are expected to be substantial over the next several years.  TheEvergy Companies rely on internally generated cash, access to capital markets and short-term moneycredit to fund capital expenditures and for working capital and liquidity. Disruption in capital markets, revolving credit facilities provided byincreases in interest rates, deterioration in the financial condition of the financial institutions and long-term capital markets as significant sources of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by cash flows from operations.  Theon which the Evergy Companies also rely, on bank-providedany credit facilities for credit support, such as letters of credit, to support operations.  The amount of credit support required for operations varies and is impacted by a number of factors.  
Great Plains Energy, KCP&L, GMO and certain of their securities are rated by Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's.  Following the announcement of the anticipated acquisition of Westar, Moody's Investors Service placed its long-term ratings on Great Plains Energy on review forrating downgrade and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services revised the outlook on Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO from stable to negative. These ratings impact the Companies' cost of funds and Great Plains Energy's ability to provide credit support for its subsidiaries.  The interest rates on borrowings under the Companies' revolving credit agreements and on a portion of Great Plains Energy's debt are subject to increase as their respective credit ratings decrease.  The amount of collateral or other credit support required under power supply and certain other agreements is also dependent on credit ratings.  
Conditionsany decrease in the United States capital and credit markets may deteriorate in the future for a variety of reasons, including, among others: instability in global markets, political uncertainty in the United States or abroad, fluctuations in themarket price of oil, geopolitical instability or other unforeseen events both in the United States and around the world. Adverse market conditions or decreases in Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's or GMO's credit ratingsEvergy's common stock could have material adverse effects on the Evergy Companies.  These effects could include, among others: reduced access to capital and increased cost of borrowed funds; dilution resulting from equity issuances at reduced prices; changes in the type and/or increases in the amount of collateral or other credit support obligations required to be posted with contractual counterparties; increased nuclear decommissioning trust and pension and other post-retirement benefit plan funding requirements; reduced ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares of Evergy common stock; rate case disallowance of KCP&L's or GMO's costs of capital; reductions in or delays of capital expenditures; limitation in or reductions in Great Plains Energy'sthe ability of Evergy to provide credit support for its subsidiaries.  AnyFurther, Westar Energy and KCP&L have outstanding tax-exempt bonds that may be put back to the respective issuer at the option of these results could adversely affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.holder. In addition, market disruption and volatility could have an adverse impact on the Companies'Evergy's lenders, suppliers and other counterparties or customers, causing them to fail to meet their obligations.
Great Plains Energy has guaranteed some of GMO’s long-term and short-term debt and payments under these guarantees may adversely affect Great Plains Energy's liquidity.
Great Plains Energy has issued guarantees covering $96.6 million of GMO's long-term debt. Great Plains Energy also guarantees GMO's commercial paper program. At December 31, 2016, GMO had $201.9 million of commercial paper outstanding.  The guarantees obligate Great Plains Energy to pay amounts owed by GMO directly to the holders of the guaranteed debt in the event GMO defaults onEvergy's holding company structure could limit its payment obligations.  Great Plains Energy may also guarantee debt that GMO may issue in the future.  Any guarantee payments could adversely affect Great Plains Energy's liquidity.
The inability of Great Plains Energy's subsidiaries to provide sufficient dividends to Great Plains Energy, or the inability otherwise of Great Plains Energyability to pay dividends on its common stock and to service its shareholders and meet its financial obligations would have an adverse effect.debt obligations.
Great Plains EnergyEvergy is a holding company with no significant operations of its own.  The primary source of funds for payment of dividends to its shareholders and its other financial obligations is dividends paid to it by its direct subsidiaries, particularly Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO.  Evergy's subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have no obligation to provide Evergy with funds. The ability of Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions, and accordingly, Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's ability to pay dividends on its common stock and meet its financial obligations, principally depends on the actual and projected earnings and cash flow,flows, capital requirements and general financial position of its subsidiaries, as well as regulatory factors, financial covenants, general business conditions and other matters.
Table of Contents


In addition, Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMOthe Evergy Companies are subject to certain corporate and regulatory restrictions and financial covenants that could affect their ability to pay dividends.  Great Plains Energy's articles of incorporation restrict the payment of common stock dividends in the event common equity is 25% or less of total capitalization. In addition, if preferred stock dividends are not declared and paid when scheduled, Great Plains Energy could not declare or pay common stock dividends or purchase any common shares.  If the unpaid preferred stock dividends are in arrears for six or more quarters, whether or not consecutive, the preferred shareholders will be entitled to name two directors to the Great Plains Energy Board of Directors. Furthermore, pursuant to settlement agreements with certain intervenors in Missouri that are pending MPSC approval with respect to the merger, Great Plains Energy agreed that in the event that KCP&L's or GMO's credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade as a result of the merger, then KCP&L and GMO would be restricted from paying a dividend to Great Plains Energy unless approved by the MPSC or until their credit ratings are restored to investment grade. Certain conditions in the MPSC and KCC orders authorizing the holding company structure require Great Plains Energy and KCP&L to maintain consolidated common equity of at least 30% and 35%, respectively, of total capitalization (including only the amount of short-term debt in excess of the amount of construction work in progress).  Under the Federal Power Act, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO generally can pay dividends only out of retained earnings. The revolving credit agreementsIn connection with approval of Great Plains Energy,the merger in Missouri, each of KCP&L and GMO agreed to not pay dividends to Evergy if its credit rating falls below BBB- for S&P Global Ratings or Baa3 for Moody's Investor Services. In connection with approval of the merger in Kansas, each of Westar Energy and KCP&L agreed to not pay dividends to Evergy if (i) the note purchase agreementpayment would result in an increase in the utility's debt level (excluding short-term debt and debt due within one year) above 60 percent of its total capitalization, absent approval from the KCC or (ii) if its credit rating falls below BBB- for GMO's Series A, B and C Senior NotesS&P Global Ratings or Baa3 for Moody's Investor Services. As described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the Evergy Companies are parties to various financing agreements that contain a covenant requiring each companyrequirements to maintain a certain financial condition that could restrict the amount of dividends the Evergy Companies are permitted to pay, such as maintaining a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization ratio of not more than 0.65 to 1.00, except as the ratio relates to Great Plains Energy, which was amended in June 2016. See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.  Great Plains Energy's Board of Directors regularly evaluates the common stock dividend policy and determines an appropriate dividend each quarter, after taking into account such factors as, among other things, earnings, financial condition and cash flows from KCP&L and GMO, as well as general economic conditions.  While the corporate and regulatory restrictions and financial covenants discussed above are not expected to affect the Companies' ability to pay1.00. Evergy cannot guarantee dividends at the current level in the foreseeable future, Great Plains Energy cannot assure common shareholders that the dividend will be paid in the future or that, if paid, dividends will be at the same amount or with the same frequency as in the past.
Market performance, increased retirements
Table of Contents


In addition, from time to time Evergy has and may guarantee debt obligations of its subsidiaries. Under the financing agreements to which Evergy is a party, a guarantee of debt may be considered indebtedness for purposes of complying with financial covenants that dictate the extent to which Evergy can borrow money, and any guarantee payments could adversely affect Evergy's liquidity and ability to service its own debt obligations.
Increasing costs associated with defined benefit retirement plan regulationsand postretirement plans, health care plans and other employee benefits could significantly impact retirement plan funding requirementsadversely affect Evergy's financial position and associated cash needsliquidity.
A substantial number of Evergy's and expenses.
Substantially all of the Companies' and WCNOC'sWolf Creek's employees participate in defined benefit retirement and other post-retirement plans.  Former employees also have accrued benefits in defined benefit retirement and other post-retirement plans.  The costs of these plans depend on a number of factors, including the rates of return on plan assets, the level and nature of the provided benefits, discount rates, the interest rates used to measure required minimum funding levels, changes in benefit design, changes in laws or regulations and the Companies'amount of any required or voluntary contributions to the plans.  The Evergy Companies currently have substantial unfunded liabilities under these plans.  Also, if the rate of retirements exceeds planned levels, or if these plans experience adverse market returns on investments or if interest rates materially fall, the Companies'required or voluntary contributions to the plans could rise substantially over historical levels.be material.  In addition, changes in accounting rules and assumptions related to future costs, returns on investments, interest rates and other actuarial assumptions, including projected retirements, could have a significant adverse impact on the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.flows of the Evergy Companies.
The costs of providing health care benefits to employees and retirees have increased in recent years and may continue to rise in the future. Future legislative changes related to health care could also cause significant changes to benefit programs and costs. The increasing costs associated with health care plans could have a significant adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Evergy Companies.
The use of derivative contracts in the normal course of business could result in losses that could negatively impact the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.flows of the Evergy Companies.
The Evergy Companies use derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures and forwards, to manage commodity and financial risks.  Losses could be recognized as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts, if a counterparty fails to perform or if the underlying transactions, which the derivative instruments are intended to hedge, fail to materialize.  In the absence of actively quoted market prices and pricing information from external sources, the valuation of these financial instruments can involve management's judgment or the use of estimates. As a result, changes in the underlying assumptions or use of alternative valuation methods could affect the reported fair value of these contracts.
AsTax legislation and an inability to utilize tax credits could adversely impact the financial results and liquidity of the Evergy Companies.
Major tax legislation, known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), was signed into law in December 2017. The TCJA significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (IRC), and is generally effective January 1, 2018. The TCJA contains significant changes to federal corporate income taxation, including reducing the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, limiting the deduction for net operating losses, eliminating net operating loss carrybacks and eliminating the use of bonus depreciation on new capital investments. The TCJA reduced revenues and internally generated cash flows due to the reduced collection of taxes in customer prices, which could adversely affect the financial results, liquidity and credit ratings of the Evergy Companies. There may be other material adverse effects of the legislation, such as causing a service providerreduction in deferred income tax assets, and the financial results and liquidity of Evergy could be adversely affected by the TCJA.
Over the last several years, income tax obligations have been reduced due to GMO, KCP&L may have exposurethe continued use of bonus depreciation provisions that allow for an acceleration of deductions for tax purposes and IRS guidance on tax deductions for repairs. Although the TCJA expands bonus depreciation in general, it eliminates bonus depreciation for regulated utilities on new capital investments. The Evergy Companies regularly assess their future ability to GMO's financial performanceutilize tax benefits, including those in the form of net operating loss, tax credit and operations.
GMO has no employees ofother tax carryforwards, that are recorded as deferred income tax assets on its own.  KCP&L employees operate and manage GMO's properties, and KCP&L charges GMO for the costbalance sheets to determine whether a valuation allowance is necessary. A reduction in, or disallowance of, these services.  These arrangements may pose risks to KCP&L, including possibletax benefits resulting from a legislative change or adverse determination by a taxing jurisdiction could have an adverse impact on the financial results and liquidity of the
Table of Contents


claims arisingEvergy Companies. Additionally, changes in corporate tax rates or policy changes, such as those resulting from actions of KCP&L employeesthe TCJA, as well as any inability to generate enough taxable income in operating GMO's properties and providing other servicesthe future to GMO.  KCP&L's claims for reimbursement for services provided to GMO are unsecured and rank equally with other unsecured obligations of GMO.  KCP&L's ability to be reimbursed for the costs incurred for the benefit of GMO dependsutilize all tax benefits before they expire, could have an adverse impact on the financial abilityresults and liquidity of GMO to make such payments.the Evergy Companies.
In addition, the Evergy Companies operate wind farms that generate production tax credits that reduce federal income tax obligations. The amount of production tax credits is dependent on the level of electricity output generated by wind farms and the applicable tax credit rate. A variety of operating and economic parameters, including transmission constraints, adverse weather conditions and breakdown or failure of equipment, could significantly reduce the production tax credits generated by these wind farms, which could have an adverse impact on the financial results of the Evergy Companies.
Customer and Weather-Related Risks:
The results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the CompaniesEvergy can be materially affected by changes in customer electricity consumption.
ChangesChange in customer electricity consumption duebehaviors in response to sustained financial market disruptions, downturnsenergy efficiency programs, changing conditions and preferences or sluggishnesschanges in the economy, technological advances, energy efficiency or other factors may adverselyadoption of technologies could affect the Companies'consumption of energy by customers. Federal and state programs exist to influence the way customers use energy and regulators have mandates to promote energy efficiency. Conservation programs and customers' level of participation in the programs could impact the financial results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  the Evergy Companies in adverse ways.
Technological advances, energy efficiency orand other energy conservation measures couldhave reduced and will continue to reduce customer electricity consumption. KCP&L and GMOThe Evergy Companies generate electricity at central station power plants to achieve economies of scale and produce electricity at a competitive cost. There areSelf-generation and distributed generation technologies, that produce electricity, including microturbines, wind turbines, fuel cells and solar cells, as well as those related to the storage of energy produced by these systems, have become competitive with the manner and price at which the Evergy Companies sell electricity. There is also a perception that have recently becomegenerating or storing electricity through these technologies is more cost competitive.environmentally friendly than generating electricity with fossil fuels. Increased adoption of these technologies could reduce electricity demand and the pool of customers from whom fixed costs are recovered, resulting in under recovery of the fixed costs of the Evergy Companies. Increased self-generation and the related use of net energy metering, which allows self-generating customers to receive bill credits for surplus power, could put upward price pressure on remaining customers. If this trend continues, the Evergy Companies are unable to adjust prices to reflect reduced electricity demand and increased self-generation and net energy metering, their financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Changes in customer electricity consumption could be reduced. Changesdue to sustained financial market disruptions, downturns or sluggishness in technology couldthe economy or other factors may also alteradversely affect the channels through whichresults of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Companies’ customers purchase or use electricity, which could reduce the Companies customer electricity consumption.Evergy Companies.
Weather is a major driver of the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flow.flows of the Evergy Companies and the Evergy Companies are subject to risks associated with climate change.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for electricity and natural gas and affect the price of energy commodities.  Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies are significantly impacted by seasonality, with approximately one-third of their retail electricand, due to energy demand created by air conditioning load, highest revenues are typically recorded in the third quarter. Unusually mild winter or summer weather can adversely affect sales.  In addition, severe weather and events, including but not limited to tornados, snow, fire, rain, flooding and ice storms, can be destructive, causing outages and property damage that can potentially result in additional expenses, lower revenues and additional capital restoration costs.  KCP&L'sStorm reserves established by the Evergy Companies may be insufficient to cover these increased costs, and GMO's rates may not always be adjusted timely and adequately to reflect these increased costs. SomeAdditionally, because many of the Evergy Companies' generating stations utilize water from the Missouri River for cooling, purposes.  Lowlow water and flow levels can increase maintenance costs at these stations, result in limited power production and if these levels were to get low enough, could require modifications to plant operations.  The possible effectsHigh water conditions can also impair planned deliveries of climatefuel to generating stations operated by the Evergy Companies. Climate change (such as increased temperatures, increased occurrence ofmay produce more frequent or severe weather events, such as storms, droughts or reduced precipitation, among other possible results)floods and could potentiallyalso impact the economic
Table of Contents


health of Evergy's service territories. An increase the volatility of demand and prices for energy commodities, increasein the frequency and impact of severe weather, increase the frequency of flooding or decrease water and flow levels. To the extent the frequencyseverity of extreme weather events increases, thisor a deterioration in the economic health of Evergy's service territories could increasehave a material adverse effect on the Companies' costresults of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Evergy Companies.
In addition, political, legal and regulatory efforts to influence climate change, such as efforts to reduce GHG emissions, impose a tax on emissions and create incentives for low-carbon generation and energy efficiency, could result in providing service.reduced sales and require significant costs to respond to such efforts. These efforts could also result in the early retirement of generation facilities, which could result in stranded costs if regulators disallow full recovery of investments that were prudent when originally made. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Evergy Companies.
Operational Risks:
Operational risks may adversely affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.flows of the Evergy Companies.
The operation of the Companies' electric generation, transmission, distribution and information systems involves many risks, including breakdown or failure of equipment,equipment; aging infrastructure, processes and personnel performance;infrastructure; operator error or contractor or subcontractor failure; problems that delay or increase the cost of returning facilities to service after outages; limitations that may be imposed by equipment conditions or environmental, safety or other regulatory requirements; fuel supply or fuel transportation reductions or interruptions; labor disputes; difficulties with the implementation or continued operation of information systems; transmission scheduling constraints; and catastrophic events such as fires, floods, droughts, explosions, terrorism, cyber threats, severe weather or other similar occurrences. Furthermore, toMany of the extent that a cyber attack was successful, customer and employee information may be stolen, equipment may be destroyed or damaged and operations may be disrupted. Any such equipment or system outage or constraint can, among other things:
in the case of generation equipment, affect operating costs, increase capital requirements and costs, increase purchased power volumes and costs and reduce wholesale sales opportunities;
Table of Contents


in the case of transmission equipment, affect operating costs, increase capital requirements and costs, require changes in the source of generation and affect wholesale sales opportunities and the ability to meet regulatory reliability and security requirements;
in the case of distribution systems, affect revenues and operating costs, increase capital requirements and costs, and affect the ability to meet regulatory service metrics and customer expectations; and
in the case of information systems, affect the control and operations ofEvergy Companies' generation, transmission and distribution customer information and other business operations and processes, increase operating costs, increase capital requirements and costs, and affect the ability to meet regulatory reliability and security requirements and customer expectations.
With the exception of Hawthorn No. 5,resources are aged, which was substantially rebuilt in 2001, and Iatan No. 2, which was completed in 2010, all of KCP&L's and GMO's coal-fired generating units and its nuclear generating unit were constructed prior to 1986.  The age of these generating units increases the risk of unplanned outages, reduced generation output and higher maintenance expense.  Training, preventive maintenance andAny equipment or system outage or constraint can, among other programs have been implemented, but there is no assurance that these programs will prevent or minimize future breakdowns or failures of the Companies' generation facilities or increased maintenance expense. Furthermore, aging transmission and distribution facilities are more prone to failure than new facilities, which results in higher maintenance expense and the need to replace these facilities with new infrastructure. The higher maintenancethings, reduce sales, increase costs and capital expenditures for new replacement infrastructure could cause additional rate volatility foraffect the Companies' customers, resistance by the Companies' regulatorsability to allowmeet regulatory service metrics, customer rate increases and/orexpectations and regulatory lag.reliability and security requirements.
The Evergy Companies currently have general liability and property insurance in place to cover a portion of their facilities, in amounts that management considers appropriate.  Thesebut such policies however, do not cover the Companies' transmission or distribution systems, and the cost of repairing damage to these systems may adversely affect the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.  Such policies are subject to certain limits and deductibles and do not include business interruption coverage.  Insurance coverage may not be available in the future at reasonable costs or on commercially reasonable terms, and the insurance proceeds received for any loss of, or any damage to, any of the Companies' facilities may not be sufficient to restore the loss or damage.
These and other operating events may reduce the Companies' revenues or increase their costs, or both, and may materially affect theirthe results of operations, financial position and cash flows.flows of the Evergy Companies.
CyberPhysical and cybersecurity breaches, criminal activity, terrorist attacks and other disruptions to facilities or information technology infrastructure could interfere with operations, expose the Evergy Companies or their customers or employees to a risk of loss, expose the Evergy Companies to legal or regulatory liability and could cause reputational and financialother harm.
Electric utilities and other operators of critical energy infrastructure, like KCP&L and GMO, may face a heightened risk of cyber attack. The Companies' facilities could be direct targets or indirect casualties of any such cyber attacks. The Companies' business relies onEvergy Companies rely upon information technology fornetworks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, their primary business, as well as in secondary operational functions, including supply chain functions and the invoicing and collectingcollection of payments from customers. The Evergy Companies also use information technology networks and systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. These networks and systems are in some cases owned or managed by third-party service providers. In the ordinary course of business, the Evergy Companies collect, store and transmit sensitive data including operating information, proprietary business information belonging to the Companies and third parties and personal information belonging to customers and employees. To
The Evergy Companies' information technology networks and infrastructure, as well as the extentnetworks and infrastructure belonging to third-party service providers that a cyber attack was successful, customer and employee informationthe Evergy Companies utilize, may be stolen, equipment may be destroyedvulnerable to damage, disruptions or damaged and operationsshutdowns due to attacks or breaches by hackers or other unauthorized third parties; error or
Table of Contents


malfeasance by one or more employees or service providers; software or hardware upgrades; additions or replacements; malicious software code; telecommunication failures; natural disasters or other catastrophic events. The occurrence of any of these events could, among other things, impact the reliability or safety of the Evergy Companies' generation, fleet and/or reliability of the transmission and distribution systems; result in the erasure of data or render the Evergy Companies' equipment, or the equipment of third-party service providers, unusable; impact the Evergy Companies' ability to conduct business in the ordinary course; reduce sales; expose the Evergy Companies and their customers, employees and vendors to a risk of loss or misuse of information; and result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties, damage the Evergy Companies' reputation or otherwise harm their business. The Evergy Companies can provide no assurance that they will identify and remedy all security or system mayvulnerabilities or that unauthorized access or error will be disrupted. In such an event,identified and remedied.
The Evergy Companies are subject to laws and rules issued by multiple government agencies concerning safeguarding and maintaining the Companies may experience substantial lossconfidentiality of revenues, material responsetheir security, customer and business information. For example, NERC has issued comprehensive regulations and standards surrounding the security of bulk power systems and is continually in the process of developing updated and new requirements with which the utility industry must comply. The NRC also has issued regulations and standards related to the protection of critical digital assets at nuclear power plants. Compliance with NERC and NRC rules and standards, and rules and standards promulgated by other regulatory agencies from time to time or future legislation, will increase the Evergy Companies' compliance costs and their exposure to the potential risk of violations of these rules, standards or future legislation, which includes potential financial penalties. Furthermore, the non-compliance of other utilities with applicable regulations or the occurrence of a serious security event at other utilities could result in increased regulation or oversight, both of which could increase the Evergy Companies' costs and impact their financial loss, includingresults.
Additionally, the increasedEvergy Companies cannot predict the impact that any future information technology or terrorist attack may have on the energy industry in general. The electric utility industry, both within the United States and internationally, has experienced physical and cybersecurity attacks on energy infrastructure such as power plants, substations and related assets in the past, and there will likely be more attacks in the future. The Evergy Companies' facilities could be direct targets or indirect casualties of such attacks. The effects of such attacks could include disruption to the Evergy Companies' generation, transmission and distribution systems or to the electrical grid in general, reduced sales and could increase the cost of insurance coverage. The Companies could also be subject to litigation, increased regulation and reputational damage.coverage or result in a decline in the U.S. economy. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on the Evergy Companies' results of operations or financial position and cash flows.

The Companies are subject to information security risks and risks of unauthorized access to their systems.
In the course of their businesses, the Companies handle a range of system security and sensitive customer information. KCP&L and GMO are subject to laws and rules issued by different agencies concerning safeguarding and maintaining the confidentiality of this information. A security breach of the utilities' information systems such as theft or the inappropriate release of certain types of information, including confidential customer information or
Table of Contents


system operating information, could have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Companies.
KCP&L and GMO operate in a highly regulated industry that requires the continued operation of sophisticated information technology systems and network infrastructures. Despite implementation of security measures, the technology systems are vulnerable to disability, failures, employee error or malfeasance, or unauthorized access. Such failures or breaches of the systems could impact the reliability of generation, transmission and distribution systems, result in legal claims and proceedings, damage the Companies' reputation and also subject the Companies to financial harm. If the technology systems were to fail or be breached and not recovered in a timely way, critical business functions could be impaired and sensitive confidential data could be compromised, which could have a material adverse impact on the Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.results.
The cost and schedule of capital projects may materially change and expected performance may not be achieved.
Great Plains Energy'sThe Evergy Companies' business is capital intensive and KCP&L's businesses are capital intensive.  The Companies currently haveregularly includes significant capital projects pending and may also have significant capital projects in the future.construction projects.  The risks of any capital project include: that actual costs may exceed estimated costs due to inflationcosts; regulators may disallow, limit or other factors;delay the recovery of all or part of the cost of, or a return on, a capital project; risks associated with the incurrence of additional debt or the issuance of additional equitycapital and credit markets to fund such projects; delays that may occur in obtainingreceiving, or failure to receive, necessary permits, approvals and materials;other regulatory authorizations; unforeseen engineering problems or changes in project design or scope; the failure of suppliers and contractors to perform as required under their contracts; inadequate availability or increased cost of equipment,labor or materials, including commodities such as steel, copper and aluminum that may be subject to uncertain or qualified craft labor; delays related toincreased tariffs; inclement weather; the scope, cost and timing of projects may change due to new or changed laws, regulations and requirements, including environmental requirements,and health and safety laws, or other factors;regulations and requirements; and other events beyond the Evergy Companies' control may occur that may materially affect the schedule, cost and performance of these projects.
These and other risks could cause the Evergy Companies to defer or limit capital expenditures, materially increase the estimated costs of capital projects, delay the in-service dates of projects, adversely affect the performance of the projects and/orand require the Companies to purchase additionalof electricity to supply their respective retail customerson the wholesale market, at potentially more expensive prices, until the projects are completed.  Thus, these risks may significantly affect the Evergy Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Table of Contents


Failure of one or more generation plant co-owners to pay their share of construction or operations and maintenance costs could increase the Evergy Companies' costs and capital requirements.
KCP&L owns 47%The Evergy Companies are co-owners of Wolf Creek, 50% of La Cygne Station, 70% of Iatan No. 1 and 55% of Iatan No.several large generation plants. See Item 2. GMO owns 18% of both Iatan units and 8% of Jeffrey Energy Center.  The remaining portions of these facilities are ownedProperties, for additional information. Failure by any other utilities that are contractually obligatedco-owner to pay theirits proportionate share of capital and other costs.
While the ownership agreements provide that a defaulting co-owner's share of the electricity generated can be sold by the non-defaulting co-owners, there is no assurance that the revenues received will recover the increased costs borne by the non-defaulting co-owners.  Occurrence of these or other events could materially increase the Evergy Companies' costsshare of the costs. Disputes may also arise between co-owners regarding operation of a plant or the sharing of expenses, which could result in legal expenses and capital requirements.damages and adversely impact the Evergy Companies' financial results.
KCP&L isThe Evergy Companies are exposed to risks associated with the ownership and operation of a nuclear generating unit, which could result in an adverse effect onadversely impact the Evergy Companies' business and financial results.
Evergy indirectly owns 94% of Wolf Creek, with Westar Energy and KCP&L ownseach owning 47% of Wolf Creek.the nuclear plant.  The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities, including Wolf Creek.  In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines, shut down the facilities, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. Additionally, the non-compliance of other nuclear facility operators with applicable regulations or the occurrence of a serious nuclear incident anywhere in the world could result in increased regulation of the nuclear industry as a whole.  Any revised safety requirements promulgated byindustry. Such events could increase Wolf Creek's costs and impact the NRC couldfinancial results of the Evergy Companies or result in substantial capital expenditures ata shutdown of Wolf Creek.
Wolf Creek has the lowest fuel cost per MWh of any of KCP&L's generating units.  An extended outage of Wolf Creek, whether resulting from NRC action, an incident at the plant or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on KCP&L'sthe results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Evergy Companies in the event KCP&L incurs higher replacement power and other costs that are not recovered through rates or insurance.  If a long-term outage
Table of Contents


occurred, the state regulatory commissions could reduce rates by excluding the Wolf Creek investment from rate base.  Wolf Creek was constructed prior to 1986 and the age of Wolf Creek increases the risk of unplanned outages and results in higher maintenance costs.
OwnershipOn an annual basis, Westar Energy and operation of a nuclear generating unit exposes KCP&L are required to risks regardingcontribute money to tax-qualified trusts that were established to pay for decommissioning costs at the end of the unit's life. KCP&L contributes annually basedThe amount of contributions varies depending on estimatedestimates of decommissioning costs to a tax-qualified trust fund to be used to decommission Wolf Creek.  The funding level assumes aexpenses and projected level of return on trust assets. If the actual return on trust assets is below the projected level or actual decommissioning costs are higher than estimated, Westar Energy and KCP&L could be responsible for the balance of funds required and may not be allowed to recover the balance through rates.
KCP&L isThe Evergy Companies are also exposed to other risks associated with the ownership and operation of a nuclear generating unit, including, but not limited to, (i) potential liability associated with the potential harmful effects on the environment and human health resulting from the operation of a nuclear generating unit, (ii) the storage, handling, disposal and potential release (by accident, through third-party actions or otherwise) of radioactive materials and (iii) uncertainties with respect to contingencies and assessments if insurance coverage is inadequate.  Under the structure for insurance among owners of nuclear generating units, Westar Energy and KCP&L isare also liable for potential retrospective premium assessments (subject to a cap) per incident at any commercial reactor in the country and losses in excess of insurance coverage.
In addition, Wolf Creek is reliant on a sole supplier for fuel and related services. The supplier has in the past been the subject of Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings, and an extended outage of Wolf Creek could occur if the supplier is not able to perform under its contracts with Wolf Creek. Switching to another supplier could take an extended amount of time and would require NRC approval. An extended outage at Wolf Creek could affect the amount of Wolf Creek investment included in customer rates and could have a material impact on the Evergy Companies' financial results.
The structure of the regional power market in which the Evergy Companies operate could have an adverse effect on the Companies'their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
In March 2014,Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO are members of the SPP launched itsregional transmission organization, and each has transferred operational authority (but not ownership) of their transmission facilities to the SPP. The SPP's Integrated Marketplace. Similar to other RTO or ISO markets, this marketplaceMarketplace determines which generating units among market participants should run, within the operating
Table of Contents


constraints of a unit, at any given time for maximum cost-effectiveness. In the event that Westar Energy's, KCP&L's andor GMO's generating units are not among the lowest cost generating units operating within the market, KCP&L and GMOeach could experience decreased levels of wholesale electricity sales.

A market for Transmission Congestion Rights (TCR) is also included as part of the Integrated Marketplace. TCRs are financial instruments used to hedge transmission congestion charges. BothWestar Energy, KCP&L and GMO acquire TCRs for the purpose of hedging against transmission congestion charges. There is a risk that KCP&L and GMOthe entities could incorrectly model the amount of TCRs needed, or that the TCRs acquired could be ineffective in hedging against transmission congestion charges, either of which could lead to increased purchased power costs.
The rules governing the various regional power markets, including the SPP, may change from time to time and such changes could impact the Companies' costs and revenues. Becauserevenues of the manner in which RTO's or ISO's will evolve is unclear, the Companies are unable to assess fully the impact of these changes.Evergy Companies.
Litigation Risks:
The outcome of legal proceedings cannot be predicted.  An adverse finding could have a material adverse effect on the Evergy Companies' results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The Evergy Companies are partyparties to various material litigationlawsuits and regulatory matters arising outproceedings in the ordinary course of their business operations.respective businesses.  The ultimate outcome of these matters cannot presently be determined, nor, in many cases, can the liability that could potentially result from a negative outcome in each case be reasonably estimated.  The liability that the Evergy Companies may ultimately incur with respect to any of these cases in the event of a negative outcome may be in excess of amounts currently reserved and insured against with respect to such matters.matters and could adversely impact the financial results for the Evergy Companies.
Risks Related to the Merger:
The anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized.
The Evergy Companies have incurred, and expect to incur additional, significant costs associated with combining the operations of Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy. Additional unanticipated costs may also be incurred in the integration of the businesses of Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy. The Evergy Companies expect the merger to produce various benefits, including, among other things, operating efficiencies and cost savings. However, achieving the anticipated benefits is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:

the ability to efficiently and effectively combine operations of the merged companies;
general market and economic conditions;
general competitive factors in the marketplace; and
higher than expected costs required to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.
No assurance can be given that these benefits will be achieved or, if achieved, the timing of their achievement. Integration costs could have a material adverse impact on the results of the Evergy Companies, and a failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger could impair Evergy's ability to repurchase shares and its ability to grow its earnings and dividend. In addition, the Evergy Companies may encounter difficulties in integrating the operations of the companies, including inconsistencies in standards, systems and controls, and management's focus and resources may be diverted from ordinary business activities and opportunities in order to focus on integration efforts. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Evergy Companies.
The price of Evergy common stock may experience volatility.
The price of Evergy common stock may be volatile. Some of the factors that could affect the price of Evergy common stock are quarterly increases or decreases in revenue or earnings, changes in revenue or earnings estimates by the investment community, the ability of the Evergy Companies to implement their integration strategy and to realize the expected synergies and other benefits from the merger, the ability of Evergy to implement its share repurchase program and speculation in the press or investment community about the Evergy Companies' financial condition or results of operations. General market conditions and U.S. economic factors and political events
Table of Contents


unrelated to the performance of the Evergy may also affect Evergy's stock price. For these reasons, shareholders should not rely on historical trends in the price of Great Plains Energy or Westar Energy common stock to predict the price of Evergy's common stock or its financial results.
Capital, credit market conditions or future legislation may adversely impact Evergy's share repurchase program.
Evergy expects to repurchase a significant number of shares over the next several years using a combination of existing cash on the balance sheet, internally generated cash, proceeds from capital markets activities and short-term debt. Disruptions in capital and credit markets, negative credit rating actions and volatility in the market price of Evergy's common stock may make capital more difficult and costlier to obtain, may restrict liquidity and may adversely impact the ability to execute the share repurchase program in a timely or cost-effective manner. Evergy's ability to execute its share repurchase program could also be adversely impacted by the passage of federal legislation prohibiting or significantly restricting the ability of companies to repurchase shares of their own stock.
Evergy has recorded goodwill that could become impaired and adversely affect financial results.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), Evergy recorded a significant amount of goodwill on its balance sheet in connection with completion of the merger. Evergy assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or circumstances occur that would indicate a potential for impairment. If goodwill is deemed to be impaired, Evergy may be required to incur material non-cash charges that could materially adversely affect its results of operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Table of Contents


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Electric Utility Generation Resources
    Year Estimated 2017 Primary
 UnitLocation Completed MW Capacity Fuel
Base LoadIatan No. 2Missouri 2010  482
(a) 
 Coal
 Wolf CreekKansas 1985  549
(a) 
 Nuclear
 Iatan No. 1Missouri 1980  490
(a) 
 Coal
 La Cygne Nos. 1 and 2Kansas 1973, 1977  699
(a) 
 Coal
 
Hawthorn No. 5 (b)
Missouri 1969  564  Coal
 Montrose Nos. 2 and 3Missouri1960, 1964 334  Coal
Peak LoadWest Gardner Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4Kansas 2003  314  Natural Gas
 OsawatomieKansas 2003  76  Natural Gas
 Hawthorn Nos. 6 and 9Missouri 2000  235  Natural Gas
 Hawthorn No. 8Missouri 2000  79  Natural Gas
 Hawthorn No. 7Missouri 2000  78  Natural Gas
 Northeast Black Start UnitMissouri 1985  2  Oil
 Northeast Nos. 17 and 18Missouri 1977  105  Oil
 Northeast Nos. 13 and 14Missouri 1976  95  Oil
 Northeast Nos. 15 and 16Missouri 1975  106  Oil
 Northeast Nos. 11 and 12Missouri 1972  93  Oil
Wind
Spearville 2 Wind Energy Facility (c)
Kansas 2010  48  Wind
 
Spearville 1 Wind Energy Facility (d)
Kansas 2006  101  Wind
Total KCP&L     4,450
   
Base LoadIatan No. 2Missouri 2010  159
(a) 
 Coal
 Iatan No. 1Missouri 1980  126
(a) 
 Coal
 Jeffrey Energy Center Nos. 1, 2 and 3Kansas1978, 1980, 1983 172
(a) 
 Coal
 Sibley Nos. 1, 2 and 3Missouri1960, 1962, 1969 448  Coal
Peak LoadLake Road Nos. 2 and 4Missouri 1957, 1967  115  Natural Gas
 South Harper Nos. 1, 2 and 3Missouri 2005  303  Natural Gas
 Crossroads Energy CenterMississippi 2002  292  Natural Gas
 Ralph Green No. 3Missouri 1981  71  Natural Gas
 Greenwood Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4Missouri 1975-1979  242  Natural Gas/Oil
 Lake Road No. 5Missouri 1974  62  Natural Gas/Oil
 Lake Road Nos. 1 and 3Missouri 1951, 1962  24  Natural Gas/Oil
 Lake Road Nos. 6 and 7Missouri 1989, 1990  42  Oil
 NevadaMissouri 1974  18  Oil
Total GMO     2,074
   
Total Great Plains Energy     6,524
   
      
Unit Capability (MW) By Owner(a)
StationUnit No.LocationYear CompletedFuelWestar EnergyKCP&LGMOTotal Company GenerationRenewable Purchased PowerTotal Generation and Renewable Purchased Power
Renewable Generation:            
Central Plains  Kansas2009Wind99


99

 99
Flat Ridge  Kansas2009Wind50


50
50
(e)100
Western Plains  Kansas2017Wind281


281

 281
Meridian Way  Kansas2008Wind



96
(e)96
Ironwood  Kansas2012Wind



168
(e)168
Post Rock  Kansas2012Wind



201
(e)201
Cedar Bluff  Kansas2015Wind



199
(e)199
Kay Wind  Oklahoma2015Wind



200
(e)200
Ninnescah  Kansas2016Wind



208
(e)208
Kingman 1  Kansas2016Wind



103
(e)103
Kingman 2  Kansas2016Wind



103
(e)103
Rolling Meadows  Kansas2010Landfill Gas



6
(e)6
Hutch Solar  Kansas2017Solar



1
(e)1
Cimarron II  Kansas2012Wind



131
(f)131
Spearville 1  Kansas2006Wind
101

101

 101
Spearville 2  Kansas2010Wind
48

48

 48
Spearville 3  Kansas2012Wind



101
(f)101
Gray County  Kansas2001Wind



110
(g)110
Ensign  Kansas2012Wind



99
(g)99
Waverly  Kansas2016Wind



200
(f)200
Slate Creek  Kansas2015Wind



150
(f)150
Rock Creek  Missouri2017Wind



300
(h)300
Osborn  Missouri2016Wind



201
(h)201
Pratt  Kansas2018Wind



243
(h)243
CNPPID (NE) - Hydro  Nebraska1941Hydro



66
(f)66
St Joseph Landfill  Missouri2012Landfill Gas

2
2

 2
Nuclear:            
Wolf Creek1(b)Kansas1985Uranium552
552

1,104

 1,104
Coal:            
Jeffrey Energy Center  Kansas         
Steam Turbines1-3(b)(i) 1978, 1980 &1983Coal2,012

175
2,187

 2,187
Table of Contents


      
Unit Capability (MW) By Owner(a)
StationUnit No.LocationYear CompletedFuelWestar EnergyKCP&LGMOTotal Company GenerationRenewable Purchased PowerTotal Generation and Renewable Purchased Power
Lawrence Energy Center  Kansas         
Steam Turbines4 & 5  1960, 1971Coal484


484

 484
La Cygne  Kansas         
Steam Turbines1 & 2(b)(c) 1973, 1977Coal699
699

1,398

 1,398
Iatan  Missouri         
Steam Turbines1 & 2(b) 1980, 2010Coal
972
285
1,257

 1,257
Hawthorn  Missouri         
Steam Turbines5(c)(d) 1969Coal
564

564

 564
Gas and Oil:            
Emporia Energy Center  Kansas         
Combustion Turbines1 - 7  2008 - 2009Natural Gas646


646

 646
Gordon Evans Energy Center  Kansas         
Combustion Turbines1 - 3  2000 - 2001Natural Gas294


294

 294
Hutchinson Energy Center  Kansas         
Combustion Turbines1 - 3  1974Natural Gas165


165

 165
 4  1975Oil70


70

 70
Spring Creek Energy Center  Oklahoma         
Combustion Turbines1 - 4  2001Natural Gas273


273

 273
State Line (40%)  Missouri         
Combined Cycle2-1, 2-2 & 2-3(b) 2001Natural Gas196


196

 196
Hawthorn  Missouri         
Combined Cycle6/9  2000Natural Gas
235

235

 235
Combustion Turbines7 & 8  2000Natural Gas
157

157

 157
West Gardner  Kansas         
Combustion Turbines1 - 4  2003Natural Gas
314

314

 314
Osawatomie  Kansas         
Combustion Turbines1  2003Natural Gas
76

76

 76
Table of Contents


      
Unit Capability (MW) By Owner(a)
StationUnit No.LocationYear CompletedFuelWestar EnergyKCP&LGMOTotal Company GenerationRenewable Purchased PowerTotal Generation and Renewable Purchased Power
Ralph Green  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines3  1981Natural Gas

71
71

 71
Nevada  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines1  1974Oil

18
18

 18
Lake Road  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines1 - 3  1951, 1958 & 1962Natural Gas

42
42

 42
 5 - 7  1974, 1989 & 1990Oil

104
104

 104
Steam Turbines4  1967Natural Gas

97
97

 97
Northeast  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines11 - 18  1972 - 1977Oil
394

394

 394
Black Start Unit   1985Oil
2

2

 2
South Harper  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines1 - 3  2005Natural Gas

303
303

 303
Greenwood Energy Center  Missouri         
Combustion Turbines1 - 4  1975 - 1979Natural Gas

242
242

 242
Crossroads Energy Center  Mississippi         
Combustion Turbines1 - 4  2002Natural Gas

292
292

 292
Total     5,821
4,114
1,631
11,566
2,936
 14,502
(a)Capability (except for wind generating facilities) represents accredited net generating capacity approved by the SPP. Capability for wind generating facilities represents the nameplate capacity. Due to the intermittent nature of wind generation, these facilities are associated with a total of 1,301 MW of accredited generating capacity.
(b) Share of a jointly owned unit.
(b)
In 2001, a new boiler, air quality control equipment and an uprated turbine was placed
(c) In 1987, KGE entered into a sale-leaseback transaction involving its 50% interest in service at the Hawthorn Generating Station.
(c)
Accredited capacity is 14 MW pursuant to SPP reliability standards.
(d)
Accredited capacity is 29 MW pursuant to SPP reliability standards.

KCP&L owns 50% of La Cygne Nos. 1Unit 2. Evergy and 2, 70% of Iatan No. 1, 55% of Iatan No. 2Westar Energy consolidate the leasing entity as a variable interest entity (VIE). See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for more information.
(d) In 2001, a new boiler, air quality control equipment and 47% of Wolf Creek. an uprated turbine was placed in service at the Hawthorn Generating Station.
(e) Westar Energy renewable purchased power agreement.
(f) KCP&L renewable purchased power agreement.
(g) GMO owns 18% of each of Iatan Nos. 1renewable purchased power agreement.
(h) KCP&L and 2 andGMO renewable purchased power agreement.
(i) Westar Energy leases 8% of the Jeffrey Energy Center Nos. 1, 2Center. Unit capacity amounts reflect both owned and 3.leased percentages.

Table of Contents


Electric Utility Transmission and Distribution Resources
Electric utility'sEvergy's electric transmission system interconnects with systems of other utilities for reliability and to permit wholesale transactions with other electricity suppliers. Electric utilityEvergy has approximately 3,60013,700 circuit miles of transmission lines, 15,60039,700 circuit miles of overhead distribution lines and 7,10012,500 circuit miles of underground distribution lines in Missouri and Kansas. Electric utilityEvergy has all material franchise rights necessary to sell electricity within its retail service territory. Electric utility'sEvergy's transmission and distribution systems are continuouslyroutinely monitored for adequacy to meet customer needs. Management believes the current systems are adequate to serve customers.
Electric Utility General
Electric utility'sEvergy's generating plants are located on property owned (or co-owned) by KCP&L or GMO,the Evergy Companies, except the Spearville Wind Energy Facilities whichfor certain facilities that are located on easements and the Crossroads Energy Center and the South Harper Facility whichor are contractually controlled. Electric utility'sEvergy's service centers, electric substations and a portion of its transmission and distribution systems are located on property owned or leased by electric utility. Electric utility'sEvergy. Evergy's transmission and distribution systems are for the most part located above or underneath highways, streets, other public places or property owned by others. Electric utilityEvergy believes that it has satisfactory rights to use those places or properties in the form of permits, grants, easements, licenses or franchise rights; however, it has not necessarily undertaken efforts to examine the underlying title to the land upon which the rights rest. Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sEvergy's headquarters are located in leased office space.
Substantially all of the fixed property and franchises of KCP&L,the Evergy Companies, which consist principally of electric generating stations, electric transmission and distribution lines and systems, and buildings (subject to exceptions, reservations and releases), are subject to a General Mortgage Indenturemortgage indentures pursuant to which bonds have been issued and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1986, as supplemented. Mortgage bonds totaling $510.5 million were outstanding at December 31, 2016.

A portion ofare outstanding. See Note 12 to the fixed property and franchises of GMO are subject to a General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated as of April 1, 1946, as supplemented. Mortgage bonds totaling $5.7 million were outstanding at December 31, 2016.consolidated financial statements for more information.
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Other Proceedings
The Evergy Companies are parties to various lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of their respective businesses.  For information regarding material lawsuits and proceedings, see Notes 2, 6, 155 and 1614 to the consolidated financial statements.  Such information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Table of Contents


PART II
ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
GREAT PLAINS ENERGYEVERGY, INC.
Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "GXP"."EVRG." At February 21, 2017, Great Plains Energy's15, 2019, Evergy's common stock was held by 14,88624,165 shareholders of record. Information relating to market prices and cash dividends on Great Plains Energy's
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the performance of Evergy's common stock is set forthduring the period that began on June 5, 2018 (the first day that Evergy's common stock traded), and ended on December 31, 2018, to the performance of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500) and the Standard & Poor's Electric Utility Index (S&P 500 Electric Utilities). The graph assumes a $100 investment in Evergy's common stock and in each of the indices at the beginning of the period and a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the period.
chart-d8c7d2388c782730123.jpg

Table of Contents


Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table.table provides information regarding purchases by Evergy of its equity securities that are registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), during the three months ended December 31, 2018.
 
Common Stock Price Range (a)
 Common Stock
 2016 2015 Dividends Declared
QuarterHigh Low High Low 2017  2016 2015
First$32.26
 $26.34
 $30.06
 $25.80
 $0.275
(b) 
 $0.2625
 $0.245
Second32.68
 28.35
 27.52
 24.16
    0.2625
 0.245
Third31.22
 26.53
 27.35
 24.21
    0.2625
 0.245
Fourth28.60
 26.20
 28.02
 25.74
    0.275
 0.2625
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Month 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(a)
Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(a)
October 1 - 31 1,341,183
(b) 
1,341,183
51,763,744
November 1 - 30 1,228,939
(c) 
1,228,939
50,534,805
December 1 - 31 6,903,355
(d) 
6,903,168
43,631,637
Total 9,473,477
 9,473,290
43,631,637
(a)    BasedIn July 2018, the Evergy Board of Directors (Evergy Board) authorized the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of Evergy's common stock with no expiration date. Evergy expects to repurchase the 60 million shares by mid-2020. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on closingEvergy's common stock prices.repurchase program.
(b)    Declared February 14, 2017,In August 2018, Evergy entered into two accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreements to purchase $450.0 million of Evergy common stock. In October 2018, one of the ASR agreements was settled early at the option of the financial institution, which resulted in the delivery of 848,226 additional shares of Evergy common stock at no additional cost. In total, 3,981,930 shares were delivered under this ASR at an average price paid per share of $56.51. In addition, Evergy repurchased 492,957 shares of common stock in the open market at an average price of $55.97.
(c)In November 2018, the final August 2018 ASR agreement was settled, which resulted in the delivery of 816,405 additional shares of Evergy common stock at no additional cost. In total, 3,950,109 shares were delivered under this ASR at an average price paid per share of $56.96. In addition, Evergy repurchased 412,534 shares of common stock in the open market at an average price of $58.16.
(d)In November 2018, Evergy entered into a new ASR agreement to purchase $475.0 million of Evergy common stock and payablethrough which 6,400,539 shares were delivered in December 2018. The final number of shares of Evergy common stock that will ultimately be delivered to Evergy, and therefore the average price paid per share, will be determined at the final settlement of the ASR by March 20, 2017, to shareholders2019 or earlier at the option of record asthe financial institution. In addition, Evergy repurchased 502,629 shares of February 27, 2017.common stock in the open market at an average price of $58.94. Evergy also purchased 187 shares for withholding taxes for restricted stock vesting at an average price of $56.45.
Dividend Restrictions
For information regarding dividend restrictions, see Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
Purchases of Equity Securities
Great Plains Energy had no purchases of its equity securities during the three months ended December 31, 2016.
KCP&L
KCP&L is a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy, which holds the one share of issued and outstanding KCP&L common stock.
Dividend Restrictions
For information regarding dividend restrictions, see Note 1317 to the consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 
2014(a)
 
2013(a)
 
2012(a)
Great Plains Energy (dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Operating revenues $2,676
 $2,502
 $2,568
 $2,446
 $2,310
Net income $290
 $213
 $243
 $250
 $200
Basic earnings per common share $1.61
 $1.37
 $1.57
 $1.62
 $1.36
Diluted earnings per common share $1.61
 $1.37
 $1.57
 $1.62
 $1.35
Total assets at year end (a) 
 $13,570
 $10,739
 $10,453
 $9,770
 $9,626
Total redeemable preferred stock, mandatorily          
redeemable preferred securities and long-          
term debt (including current maturities) (a)
 $3,747
 $3,746
 $3,481
 $3,492
 $2,999
Cash dividends per common share $1.0625
 $0.9975
 $0.935
 $0.8825
 $0.855
SEC ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and          
preferred dividend requirements 2.54 2.58 2.72 2.75 2.31
           
KCP&L          
Operating revenues $1,875
 $1,714
 $1,731
 $1,671
 $1,580
Net income $225
 $153
 $162
 $169
 $142
Total assets at year end (a)
 $8,058
 $7,815
 $7,495
 $6,821
 $6,689
Total redeemable preferred stock, mandatorily          
redeemable preferred securities and long-          
term debt (including current maturities) (a)
 $2,565
 $2,563
 $2,297
 $2,294
 $1,887
SEC ratio of earnings to fixed charges 3.30 2.57 2.69 2.76 2.58
Year Ended December 31 
2018(a)
 2017 2016 2015 2014
Evergy (dollars in millions except per share amounts)
Operating revenues $4,276
 $2,571
 $2,562
 $2,459
 $2,602
Net income $546
 $337
 $361
 $302
 $322
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc. $536
 $324
 $347
 $292
 $313
Basic earnings per common share $2.50
 $2.27
 $2.43
 $2.11
 $2.40
Diluted earnings per common share $2.50
 $2.27
 $2.43
 $2.09
 $2.35
Total assets at year end $25,598
 $11,624
 $11,487
 $10,706
 $10,289
Total long-term obligations at year end (b)
 $7,472
 $3,846
 $3,699
 $3,379
 $3,433
Cash dividends per common share $1.735
 $1.60
 $1.52
 $1.44
 $1.40
Westar Energy          
Operating revenues $2,615
 $2,571
 $2,562
 $2,459
 $2,602
Net income $349
 $337
 $361
 $302
 $322
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc. $339
 $324
 $347
 $292
 $313
Total assets at year end $11,817
 $11,624
 $11,487
 $10,706
 $10,289
Total long-term obligations at year end (b)
 $3,817
 $3,846
 $3,699
 $3,379
 $3,433
KCP&L          
Operating revenues $1,823
 $1,891
 $1,875
 $1,714
 $1,731
Net income $163
 $180
 $225
 $153
 $162
Total assets at year end $8,121
 $8,124
 $8,058
 $7,815
 $7,495
Total long-term obligations at year end (b)
 $2,532
 $2,582
 $2,565
 $2,563
 $2,297
(a) AdjustedOn June 4, 2018, Evergy completed the mergers contemplated by the Amended Merger Agreement. The results of Great Plains Energy's direct subsidiaries have been included in Evergy's results from the date of the closing of the merger and thereafter. KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy for adoption2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
(b)Includes long-term debt, current maturities of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentationlong-term debt, capital leases, long-term debt of Debt IssuanceCosts.VIEs and current maturities of long-term debt of VIEs.
ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATEDEVERGY, INC.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Description of Business
Great Plains EnergyEvergy, Inc. is a public utility holding company incorporated in 2017 and does not own or operate anyheadquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Evergy operates primarily through the following wholly-owned direct subsidiaries:
Westar Energy is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Kansas. Westar Energy has one active wholly-owned subsidiary with significant assets other thanoperations, KGE.
KCP&L is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the stockstates of Missouri and Kansas.
GMO is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Missouri.
GPETHC owns 13.5% of Transource with the remaining 86.5% owned by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a subsidiary of AEP. Transource is focused on the development of competitive electric transmission projects. GPETHC accounts for its subsidiariesinvestment in Transource under the equity method.
Table of Contents


Westar Energy also owns a 50% interest in Prairie Wind, which is a joint venture between Westar Energy and cashaffiliates of AEP and cash equivalents andBerkshire Hathaway Energy Company. Prairie Wind owns a time deposit to be used to fund a portion of108-mile, 345 kV double-circuit transmission line that provides transmission service in the cash considerationSPP. Westar Energy accounts for its investment in Prairie Wind under the anticipated acquisition of Westar.equity method.
Great Plains Energy's sole reportableWestar Energy and KGE conduct business segment is electric utility. Electric utility consists ofin their respective service territories using the name Westar Energy. KCP&L a regulated utility, GMO's regulated utility operations and GMO Receivables Company.  Electric utility hasconduct business in their respective service territories using the name KCP&L. Collectively, the Evergy Companies have approximately 6,50014,500 MWs of owned generating capacity and engagesrenewable purchased power agreements and engage in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity to approximately 855,7001.6 million customers in the states of MissouriKansas and Kansas.  Electric utility's retail electricity rates are comparable to the national average of investor-owned utilities.Missouri. The Evergy Companies assess financial performance and allocate resources on a consolidated basis (i.e., operate in one segment).
Great Plains Energy's corporateEnergy and otherWestar Energy Merger
Evergy was incorporated in 2017 as Monarch Energy, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy. Prior to the closing of the merger transactions, Monarch Energy changed its name to Evergy and did not conduct any business activities not included in the sole reportable business segment includes GMO activity other than those required for its regulated utility operations, GPETHCformation and unallocated corporate charges including certain costs to achievematters contemplated by the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
Anticipated Acquisition of Westar Energy, Inc.
Amended Merger Agreement. On May 29, 2016, Great Plains Energy entered into a Merger Agreement by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar, and, from and after its accession toJune 4, 2018, in accordance with the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub. Pursuant to the Merger
Table of Contents


Agreement, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Westar, with Westar continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon closing, pursuant to theAmended Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy will acquiremerged into Evergy, with Evergy surviving the merger and King Energy merged into Westar for (i) $51.00Energy, with Westar Energy surviving the merger. These merger transactions resulted in cashEvergy becoming the parent entity of Westar Energy and (ii)the direct subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy, including KCP&L and GMO. As a number, rounded toresult of the nearest 1/10,000closing of athe merger transactions, each outstanding share of Great Plains Energy common stock equalwas converted into 0.5981 shares of Evergy common stock, resulting in the issuance of 128.9 million shares. Additionally, each outstanding share of Westar Energy common stock was converted into 1 share of Evergy common stock.
Westar Energy was determined to an exchange ratio that may vary between 0.2709be the accounting acquirer and 0.3148, based uponthus, the volume-weighted average price per sharepredecessor of Evergy. Therefore, Evergy's accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations of Westar Energy for 2017 and 2016 and the financial position of Westar Energy as of December 31, 2017. Evergy had separate operations for the period beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2018, and references to amounts for periods after the closing of the merger relate to Evergy. The results of Great Plains Energy's direct subsidiaries have been included in Evergy's results of operations from the date of the closing of the merger and thereafter.
KCP&L has elected not to apply "push-down accounting" related to the merger, whereby the adjustments of assets and liabilities to fair value and the resulting goodwill would be recorded on the financial statements of the acquired subsidiary. These adjustments for KCP&L, as well as those related to the acquired assets and liabilities of Great Plains Energy common stock during a 20 consecutive full trading day period endingand its other direct subsidiaries, are only reflected on (and including) the third trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the merger, for each share of Westar common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, with Westar becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy.

Great Plains Energy's anticipated acquisition of Westar was unanimously approved by the Great Plains Energy Board and the Westar Board, has received the required approvals of each of Great Plains Energy's and Westar's shareholders and The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and has received early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act with respect to antitrust review. The anticipated acquisition remains subject to regulatory approvals from KCC, the MPSC, NRC and FERC; as well as other customary conditions.

On October 3, 2016, Great Plains Energy completed registered public offerings of 60.5 million shares of common stock for total net proceeds of $1.55 billion and 17.3 million depositary shares each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock for total net proceeds of $836.2 million. The proceeds from these offerings will be used to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition.Evergy's consolidated financial statements.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding the acquisition.merger.
Earnings OverviewCommon Stock Repurchase Program
Great Plains Energy's 2016 earnings available forIn July 2018, the Evergy Board authorized the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of Evergy's common shareholders increasedstock. Although this repurchase authorization has no expiration date, Evergy expects to $273.5repurchase approximately 60 million shares by mid-2020. Evergy plans to utilize various methods to effectuate the share repurchase program, including but not limited to, a series of transactions that may include ASRs, open market transactions or $1.61 per share from $211.4other means, subject to market conditions and applicable legal requirements. The repurchase program may be suspended, discontinued or resumed at any time. For 2018, Evergy had total repurchases of common stock of approximately $1,042 million or $1.37 per share in 2015 driven primarily by new retail rates and cost recovery mechanisms; warmer weather; a performance incentive for energy efficiency programshad repurchased 16.4 million shares under the Missouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act (MEEIA)repurchase program. These repurchase totals include shares repurchased under ASR agreements, one of which had not reached final settlement as of December 31, 2018, and are discussed further below.
In August 2018, Evergy entered into two ASR agreements with financial institutions to purchase $450.0 million of Evergy common stock. The ASR agreements reached final settlement in the fourth quarter of 2018 and resulted in the delivery of 7.9 million shares to Evergy based on the average daily volume weighted-average price of Evergy common stock during the term of the ASR agreements, less a decrease in interest charges; partially offset by a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand; costs to achieve the anticipated acquisitionnegotiated discount.
Table of Westar; an increase in utility operating and maintenance expense; depreciation and amortization expense and general taxes; higher income tax expense; and increased preferred stock dividend requirements.Contents


In addition,November 2018, Evergy entered into an ASR agreement with a higher numberfinancial institution to purchase $475.0 million of average shares outstanding dueEvergy common stock. In December 2018, the financial institution delivered to Great Plains Energy's registered public offering of 60.5Evergy 6.4 million shares of common stock, representing a partial settlement of the contract, based on then-current market prices and Evergy paid a total of $475.0 million. The final number of shares of Evergy common stock that Evergy may receive or be required to remit upon settlement of the ASR agreement will be based on the average daily volume weighted-average price of Evergy common stock during the term of the ASR agreement, less a negotiated discount. Final settlement of the ASR agreement will occur by March 2019, but may occur earlier at the option of the financial institution. Evergy expects that the final settlement of the ASR agreement will result in October 2016 diluted 2016 earnings per share by $0.15.the delivery of additional shares of common stock to Evergy at no additional cost.
For additionalSee Note17 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding the change in earnings, refer to the Great Plains Energy Results of Operations and the Electric Utility Results of Operations sections within this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).
Adjusted Earnings (Non-GAAP) and Adjusted Earnings Per Share (Non-GAAP)
Great Plains Energy's adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) for 2016 were $286.0 million and $1.85, respectively. For 2015 and 2014, adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) were the same as GAAP earnings and GAAP earnings per share at $211.4 million and $1.37 and $241.2 million and $1.57, respectively. In addition to earnings available forEvergy's common shareholders and diluted earnings per common share, Great Plains Energy's management uses adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) to evaluate earnings and earnings per share without the impact of the anticipated acquisition of Westar. Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) excludes certain costs, expenses, gains, losses and the per share dilutive effect of equity issuances resulting from the anticipated acquisition. This information is intended to enhance an investor's overall understanding of results. Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) are used internally to measure performance against budget and in reports for management and the Great Plains Energy Board. Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) are financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with GAAP and may not be comparable to other companies' presentations or more useful than the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this report.
Table of Contents


The following table provides a reconciliation between earnings available for common shareholders and diluted earnings per common share as determined in accordance with GAAP and adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) and adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP):
   2016
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP   
Earnings
per
diluted
share
  (millions, except per share amounts)
Earnings available for common shareholders $273.5
 $1.61
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar:    
Operating expense, pre-tax (a)
 34.2
 0.22
Financing, pre-tax (b)
 35.9
 0.24
Mark-to-market impacts of interest rate swaps, pre-tax (c)
 (79.3) (0.51)
Interest income, pre-tax (d)
 (3.2) (0.02)
Income tax expense (e)
 9.5
 0.06
Preferred stock (f)
 15.4
 0.10
Dilutive impact of October 2016 share issuance (g)
 N/A
 0.15
Adjusted earnings (non-GAAP) $286.0
 $1.85
Average Shares Outstanding    
Shares used in calculating diluted earnings per common share 169.8
Adjustment for October 2016 share issuance (g)
 (14.9)
Shares used in calculating adjusted earnings per share (non-GAAP) 154.9
(a) Reflects legal, advisory and consulting fees and certain severance expenses and are included in Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.stock repurchase program.
(b) Reflects fees incurredMissouri Legislation
On June 1, 2018, Missouri Senate Bill (S.B.) 564 was signed into law by the Governor of Missouri. Most notably, S.B. 564 includes a PISA provision that can be elected by Missouri electric utilities to finance the anticipated acquisitiondefer to a regulatory asset and recover 85% of Westar, including feesdepreciation expense and associated return on investment for a bridge term loan facility, and are included in Interest charges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(c) Reflects the mark-to-market gain on interestqualifying electric plant rate swaps entered into in connection with financing the anticipated acquisition of Westar and is included in Interest charges on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(d) Reflects interest income earned on the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's October 2016 equity offerings and is included in Non-operating income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
(e) Reflects an income tax effect calculated at a 38.9% statutorybase additions. Qualifying electric plant includes all rate base additions with the exception of certain non-deductible legalnew coal, nuclear or natural gas generating units or rate base additions that increase revenues by allowing service to new customer premises. The deferred depreciation and financing fees.
(f) Reflects reductionsreturn recorded in the associated regulatory asset, except for any prudence disallowances, is required to earnings available for common shareholders related to preferred stock dividend requirements for Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock issued in October 2016 and the redemption of cumulative preferred stock in August 2016, including the redemption premium, and arebe included in Preferred stock dividend requirementsdetermining the utility's rate base during subsequent general rate proceedings subject to a 3% compound annual growth rate limitation on future electric rates compared with the utility's rates in effect prior to electing PISA. Utilities that elect the PISA provision can make qualifying deferrals of depreciation and redemption premium onreturn through December 2023, with a potential extension through December 2028 subject to MPSC approval. Except under certain circumstances, utilities that elect the consolidated statementsPISA provision must keep base rates constant for three years following the utilities' last general rate case. KCP&L and GMO have elected the PISA provision of comprehensive income.
(g) Reflects the average share impactS.B. 564 effective as of Great Plains Energy's issuance of 60.5 million shares of common stock in October 2016.January 1, 2019.

Regulatory Proceedings
See Note 65 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding regulatory proceedings.
Plant Retirements
In 2017, Westar Energy announced plans to retire Unit 7 at Tecumseh Energy Center, Units 3 and 4 at Murray Gill Energy Center and Units 1 and 2 at Gordon Evans Energy Center, subject to the completion of the merger in 2018. In 2017, KCP&L and GMO also announced plans to retire KCP&L's Montrose Station and GMO's Sibley Station.
In the fourth quarter of 2018, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO retired these stations consistent with their previously announced plans.
Strategy
Evergy expects to continue operating its vertically integrated utilities within the currently existing regulatory frameworks. Evergy's objectives are to deliver value to shareholders through earnings and dividend growth; serve customers and communities with reliable service, clean energy and fewer and lower rate increases; and maintain a rewarding and challenging work environment for employees. Significant elements of Evergy's strategy to achieve these objectives include:
the realization of a total of approximately $550 million of potential net savings from 2018 through 2022 resulting from synergies that are expected to be created as a result of the merger;
the repurchase of approximately 60 million outstanding shares of Evergy common stock by mid-2020;
anticipated rate base investment of approximately $6 billion from 2018 through 2022;
the continued growth of Evergy's renewable energy portfolio as the Evergy Companies retire older and less efficient fossil fuel plants; and
Table of Contents


implementation of the rate orders received by the KCC and MPSC in 2018.
See "Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Forward-Looking Information" and Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, for additional information.
Earnings Overview
The following table summarizes Evergy's net income and diluted earnings per common share (EPS).
 2018 2017 Change
 (millions, except per share amounts)
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc.$535.8
 $323.9
 $211.9
Earnings per common share, diluted2.50
 2.27
 0.23
Net income and diluted EPS increased in 2018 compared to 2017, primarily due to the inclusion of KCP&L's and GMO's earnings beginning in June 2018, higher Westar Energy retail sales driven by favorable weather and lower income tax expense, partially offset by merger-related costs and reductions of revenue for customer bill credits incurred following the close of the merger.
In addition, a higher number of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding due to the issuance of common shares to Great Plains Energy shareholders as a result of the merger diluted earnings per share $1.26 for 2018.
For additional information regarding the change in net income, refer to the Evergy Results of Operations section within this MD&A.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the impact of recently issued accounting standards.
Wolf Creek Refueling Outage
Wolf Creek's latestmost recent refueling outage began on September 10, 2016in March 2018 and ended on November 21, 2016.the unit returned to service in May 2018. Wolf Creek's next refueling outage is planned to begin in the firstthird quarter of 2018.2019.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
See Note 1514 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding environmental matters.
Table of Contents


RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
See Note 1816 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding related party transactions.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made and changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been used could have a material impact on Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's results of operations and financial position. Management has identified the following accounting policies as critical to the understanding of Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's results of operations and financial position. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Great Plains Energy BoardEvergy Board.
Table of Directors.Contents


Pensions
Great Plains EnergyEvergy incurs significant costs in providing non-contributory defined pension benefits. The costs are measured using actuarial valuations that are dependent upon numerous factors derived from actual plan experience and assumptions of future plan experience.
Pension costs are impacted by actual employee demographics (including age, life expectancies, compensation levels and employment periods), earnings on plan assets, the level of contributions made to the plan, and plan amendments. In addition, pension costs are also affected by changes in key actuarial assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the projected benefit obligation and pension costs.
The assumed rate of return on plan assets was developed based on the weighted-average of long-term returns forecast for the expected portfolio mix of investments held by the plan. The assumed discount rate was selected based on the prevailing market rate of fixed income debt instruments with maturities matching the expected timing of the benefit obligation. These assumptions, updated annually at the measurement date, are based on management's best estimates and judgment; however, material changes may occur if these assumptions differ from actual events. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net costs.
The following table reflects the sensitivities associated with a 0.5% increase or a 0.5% decrease in key actuarial assumptions.assumptions for Evergy's qualified pension plans. Each sensitivity reflects the impact of the change based on a change in that assumption only.
  Impact on  Impact on
  Projected2016  Projected2019
Change inBenefitPensionChange inBenefitPension
Actuarial assumptionAssumptionObligationExpenseAssumptionObligationExpense
  (millions)  (millions)
Discount rate0.5%increase $(86.1) $(5.9) 0.5%increase $(173.9) $(19.0) 
Rate of return on plan assets0.5%increase 
 (3.4) 0.5%increase 
 (8.1) 
Rate of compensation0.5%increase 40.5
 8.5
 
Discount rate0.5%decrease 96.9
 6.1
 0.5%decrease 197.3
 21.3
 
Rate of return on plan assets0.5%decrease 
 3.4
 0.5%decrease 
 8.1
 
Rate of compensation0.5%decrease (36.4) (7.7) 
Pension expense for Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO is recorded in accordance with rate orders from the MPSCKCC and KCC.MPSC. The orders allow the difference between pension costs under GAAP and pension costs for ratemaking to be recorded as a regulatory asset or liability with future ratemaking recovery or refunds, as appropriate.
In 2016, Great Plains Energy's2018, Evergy's pension expense was $98.2$90.1 million under GAAP and $93.3$98.4 million for ratemaking. The impact on 20162019 pension expense in the table above reflects the impact on GAAP pension costs. Under the
Table of Contents


Evergy Companies' rate agreements, any increase or decrease in GAAP pension expense would be deferred in a regulatory asset or liability for future ratemaking treatment. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the accounting for pensions.
Market conditions and interest rates significantly affect the future assets and liabilities of the plan. It is difficult to predict future pension costs, changes in pension liability and cash funding requirements due to the inherent uncertainty of market conditions.
Revenue Recognition
Evergy recognizes revenue on the sale of electricity to customers over time as the service is provided in the amount it has the right to invoice. Revenues recorded include electric services provided but not yet billed by Evergy. Unbilled revenues are recorded for kWh usage in the period following the customers' billing cycle to the end of the
Table of Contents


month. This estimate is based on net system kWh usage less actual billed kWhs. Evergy's estimated unbilled kWhs are allocated and priced by regulatory jurisdiction across the rate classes based on actual billing rates. Evergy's unbilled revenue estimate is affected by factors including fluctuations in energy demand, weather, line losses and changes in the composition of customer classes. See Note 4 for the balance of unbilled receivables for Evergy as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The CompanyEvergy has recorded assets and liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets resulting from the effects of the ratemaking process, which would not otherwise be recorded under GAAP. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that are probable of recovery from future revenues. Regulatory liabilities represent future reductions in revenues or refunds to customers.
Management regularly assesses whether regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of future recovery or refund by considering factors such as decisions by the MPSC, KCC or FERC in electric utility'sEvergy's rate case filings; decisions in other regulatory proceedings, including decisions related to other companies that establish precedent on matters applicable to electric utility;Evergy; and changes in laws and regulations. If recovery or refund of regulatory assets or liabilities is not approved by regulators or is no longer deemed probable, these regulatory assets or liabilities are recognized in the current period results of operations. Electric utility'sEvergy's continued ability to meet the criteria for recording regulatory assets and liabilities may be affected in the future by restructuring and deregulation in the electric industry or changes in accounting rules. In the event that the criteria no longer applied to all or a portion of electric utility'sEvergy's operations, the related regulatory assets and liabilities would be written off unless an appropriate regulatory recovery mechanism were provided. Additionally, these factors could result in an impairment on utility plant assets. See Note 65 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Impairments of Assets Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Long-lived assets and intangible assets subject to amortization are required to be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable as prescribed under GAAP.
Accounting rules require goodwill to be tested for impairment annually and when an event occurs indicating the possibility that an impairment exists. The goodwill impairment test is a two step process. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Company's plans to adopt Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-04 for its 2017 goodwill impairment test. The first step comparesconsists of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill, to identify potential impairment. IfIn the event that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, an impairment loss is recognized for the second step of the test is performed, consisting of assignment of the reporting unit's fair value to its assets and liabilities to determine an implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared todifference between the carrying amount of goodwill to determine the impairment loss, if any, to be recognized in the financial statements. Great Plains Energy's regulated electric utilityreporting unit and its fair value. Evergy's consolidated operations are considered one reporting unit for assessment of impairment, as they are included within the same operating segmentmanagement assesses financial performance and have similar economic characteristics.
The annualallocates resources on a consolidated basis. Evergy's first impairment test for the $169.0$2,338.9 million of GMO acquisition goodwill wasfrom the Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy merger will be conducted on SeptemberMay 1, 2016. Fair value of2019.
Evergy anticipates that the reporting unit substantially exceeded the carrying amount, including goodwill; therefore, there was no impairment of goodwill.
The determination of fair value offor the reporting unit consistedwill consist of two valuation techniques: an income approach consisting of a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach consisting of a determination of reporting unit invested capital using market multiples derived from the historical revenue, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, (EBITDA), net utility asset values and market prices of stock of peer companies. The results of the two techniques werewill be evaluated and weighted to determine a point within the range that management consideredconsiders representative of fair value for the reporting unit, which involves a significant amount of management judgment.
Table of Contents


The discounted cash flow analysis is most significantly impacted by two assumptions: estimated future cash flows and the discount rate applied to those cash flows. Management determinedwill determine the appropriate discount rate to be based on the reporting unit's weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The WACC takes into account both the return on equity authorized by the MPSCKCC and KCCMPSC and after-tax cost of debt. Estimated future cash flows are based on Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's internal business plan, which assumes the occurrence of certain events in the future, such as the outcome of future rate filings, future approved rates of return on equity, anticipated earnings/returns related to future capital investments, continued recovery of cost of service and the renewal of certain contracts. Management also makes assumptions regarding the run rate of operations, maintenance and general and administrative costs based on the expected outcome of the aforementioned events. Should the actual outcome of some or all of these assumptions
Table of Contents


differ significantly from the current assumptions, revisions to current cash flow assumptions could cause the fair value of Great Plains Energy'sthe Evergy reporting unit under the income approach to be significantly different in future periods and could result in a future impairment charge to goodwill.
The market approach analysis is most significantly impacted by management's selection of relevant peer companies as well as the determination of an appropriate control premium to be added to the calculated invested capital of the reporting unit, as control premiums associated with a controlling interest are not reflected in the quoted market price of a single share of stock. Management determinedwill determine an appropriate control premium by using an average of control premiums for recent acquisitions in the industry. Changes in results of peer companies, selection of different peer companies and future acquisitions with significantly different control premiums could result in a significantly different fair value of Great Plains Energy'sthe Evergy reporting unit.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset/liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred investment tax credits are amortized ratably over the life of the related property. Deferred tax assets are also recorded for net operating losses, capital losses and tax credit carryforwards. The CompanyEvergy is required to estimate the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and the deferred tax liabilities and assets for future tax consequences of events reflected in the Company'sEvergy's consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Actual results could differ from these estimates for a variety of reasons including changes in income tax laws, enacted tax rates and results of audits by taxing authorities. This process also requires management to make assessments regarding the timing and probability of the ultimate tax impact from which actual results may differ. The CompanyEvergy records valuation allowances on deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized. See Note 2219 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Evergy has recognized legal obligations associated with the disposal of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of such assets. Concurrent with the recognition of the liability, the estimated cost of the ARO incurred at the time the related long-lived assets were either acquired, placed in service or when regulations establishing the obligation became effective. The recording of AROs for regulated operations has no income statement impact due to the deferral of the adjustments through the establishment of a regulatory asset or an offset to a regulatory liability.
Evergy initially recorded AROs at fair value for the estimated cost to decommission Wolf Creek (94% share), retire wind generating facilities, dispose of asbestos insulating material at its power plants, remediate ash disposal ponds and close ash landfills, among other items. ARO refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement may be conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. In determining Evergy's AROs, assumptions are made regarding probable future disposal costs and the timing of their occurrence. A change in these assumptions could have a significant impact on Evergy's AROs reflected on its consolidated balance sheets.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Evergy had recorded AROs of $687.1 million and $405.1 million, respectively. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding Evergy's AROs.
EVERGY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Evergy's results of operations and financial position are affected by a variety of factors including rate regulation, fuel costs, weather, customer behavior and demand, the economy and competitive forces.
Substantially all of Evergy's revenues are subject to state or federal regulation. This regulation has a significant impact on the price the Evergy Companies charge for electric service. Evergy's results of operations and financial position are affected by its ability to align overall spending, both operating and capital, within the frameworks established by its regulators.
Table of Contents


GREAT PLAINS ENERGY RESULTS OF OPERATIONSWholesale revenues are impacted by, among other factors, demand, cost and availability of fuel and purchased power, price volatility, available generation capacity, transmission availability and weather.
The Evergy Companies primarily use coal and uranium for the generation of electricity for their customers and also purchase power on the open market. The prices for these commodities can fluctuate significantly due to a variety of factors including supply, demand, weather and the broader economic environment. Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO have fuel recovery mechanisms in their Kansas and Missouri jurisdictions, as applicable, that allow them to defer and subsequently recover or refund, through customer rates, substantially all of the variance in net energy costs from the amount set in base rates without a general rate case proceeding.
Weather significantly affects the amount of electricity that Evergy's customers use as electricity sales are seasonal. As summer peaking utilities, the third quarter typically accounts for the greatest electricity sales by the Evergy Companies. Hot summer temperatures and cold winter temperatures prompt more demand, especially among residential and commercial customers, and to a lesser extent, industrial customers. Mild weather reduces customer demand.
Energy efficiency investments by customers and the Evergy Companies also can affect the demand for electric service. Through the Missouri Energy Efficiency Investment Act (MEEIA), KCP&L and GMO offer energy efficiency and demand side management programs to their Missouri retail customers and recover program costs, throughput disincentive, and as applicable, certain performance incentives in retail rates through a rider mechanism.
The following table summarizes Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's comparative results of operations.
 2016 2015 2014
 (millions)
Operating revenues$2,676.0
 $2,502.2
 $2,568.2
Fuel and purchased power(590.1) (608.7) (742.5)
Transmission(84.8) (89.1) (74.7)
Other operating expenses(1,003.2) (943.9) (910.5)
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar(34.2) 
 
Depreciation and amortization(344.8) (330.4) (306.0)
Operating income618.9
 530.1
 534.5
Non-operating income and expenses2.8
 3.7
 12.5
Interest charges(161.5) (199.3) (188.5)
Income tax expense(172.2) (122.7) (115.7)
Income from equity investments2.0
 1.2
 
Net income290.0
 213.0
 242.8
Preferred dividends and redemption premium(16.5) (1.6) (1.6)
Earnings available for common shareholders$273.5
 $211.4
 $241.2
Reconciliation of gross margin to operating revenue:     
Operating revenues$2,676.0
 $2,502.2
 $2,568.2
Fuel and purchased power(590.1) (608.7) (742.5)
Transmission(84.8) (89.1) (74.7)
Gross margin (a)
$2,001.1
 $1,804.4
 $1,751.0
(a)
Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin below.
2016 Compared to 2015
Electric Utility Segment
Electric utility's net income increased $68.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to:
a $196.7 million increase in gross margin driven by new retail rates and cost recovery mechanisms, warmer weather and an increase in the recovery of program costs and throughput disincentive as well as a performance incentive for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, partially offset by a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand;
a $50.0 million increase in other operating expenses driven by an increase in pension expense, an increase in program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, an increase in plant operating and maintenance expenses, an increase in injuries and damages expense and an increase in general taxes driven by higher property taxes and higher gross receipts taxes due to an increase in retail revenues;
$15.9 million of operating expenses for costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar;
a $14.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense driven by capital additions;
a $5.2 million increase in interest charges primarily due to an increase in interest expense in 2016 related to KCP&L's issuance of $350 million of 3.65% Senior Notes in August 2015; partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to KCP&L's purchase in lieu of redemption of its $50.0 million and $21.9 million Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding (EIRR) Series 2005 bonds in September 2015; and
a $43.5 million increase in income tax expense driven by an increase in pre-tax income.
Table of Contents

 2018 Change 2017 Change 2016
 (millions)
Operating revenues$4,275.9
 $1,704.9
 $2,571.0
 $8.9
 $2,562.1
Fuel and purchased power1,078.7
 537.2
 541.5
 32.0
 509.5
SPP network transmission costs259.9
 12.0
 247.9
 15.1
 232.8
Other operating expenses1,384.9
 653.8
 731.1
 (47.8) 778.9
Depreciation and amortization618.8
 247.1
 371.7
 33.2
 338.5
Income from operations933.6
 254.8
 678.8
 (23.6) 702.4
Other income (expense), net(54.4) (27.6) (26.8) (25.3) (1.5)
Interest expense279.6
 108.6
 171.0
 9.3
 161.7
Income tax expense59.0
 (92.2) 151.2
 (33.3) 184.5
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes5.4
 (1.3) 6.7
 0.2
 6.5
Net income546.0
 209.5
 336.5
 (24.7) 361.2
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests10.2
 (2.4) 12.6
 (2.0) 14.6
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc.$535.8
 $211.9
 $323.9
 $(22.7) $346.6

CorporateEvergy Utility Gross Margin and Other ActivitiesMWh Sales
Great Plains Energy's corporate and other activities loss increased $6.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to:
$7.5 million of other operating expenses for the settlement of litigation at MPS Merchant in 2016;
$18.3 million of operating expenses for costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar;
$35.9 million of interest charges for fees incurred for a bridge term loan facility entered into in connection with the anticipated acquisition of Westar;
a $79.3 million mark-to-market gain on interest rate swaps entered into in June 2016 to hedge against interest rate fluctuations on future issuances of long-term debt expected to be issued to finance a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar;
$3.2 million of interest income earned on the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's October 2016 common stock and depositary share offerings;
$12.7 million of income tax expense related to these items; and
$15.4 million of reductions to earnings available for common shareholders consisting of $14.8 million of dividends on Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock issued in October 2016 and $0.6 million related to the redemption of Great Plains Energy's cumulative preferred stock in August 2016.
2015 Compared to 2014
Electric Utility Segment
Electric utility's net income decreased $19.7 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to:
a $53.4 million increase in gross margin driven by new retail rates, an increase in recovery of program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, an increase in recovery of renewable energy costs under the Renewable Energy Standard Rate Adjustment Mechanism (RESRAM), an increase in weather-normalized retail demand and an increase in other margin items, partially offset by lower wholesale margins, higher transmission expense and weather;
a $33.8 million increase in other operating expenses primarily driven by an increase in program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, an increase in amortization of deferred renewable energy costs under RESRAM and an increase in general taxes driven by higher property taxes, partially offset by a decrease in Wolf Creek operating and maintenance expenses;
a $24.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense due to capital additions;
an $11.8 million decrease in non-operating income and expenses driven by a $13.2 million decrease in the equity component of Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) primarily due to a lower average construction work in progress in 2015 due to environmental upgrades at KCP&L's La Cygne Station being placed into service;
a $7.9 million increase in interest charges primarily due to a $7.2 million decrease in the debt component of AFUDC; and
a $4.8 million decrease in income tax expense primarily driven by decreased pre-tax income.
Corporate and Other Activities
Great Plains Energy's corporate and other activities loss increased $10.1 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the release of uncertain tax positions related to former GMO non-regulated operations in the third quarter of 2014 which resulted in:
$2.1 million lower after-tax interest expense in 2014; and
$6.1 million of income tax benefits in 2014.
Table of Contents


Gross Margin
Gross margin is a financial measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP.  GrossUtility gross margin, as used by Great Plains Energy and KCP&L,the Evergy Companies, is defined as operating revenues less fuel and purchased power costs and transmission.amounts billed by the SPP for network transmission costs. Expenses for fuel and purchased power and certain transmission costs, offset by wholesale sales margin, are subject to recovery through cost adjustment mechanisms, except for KCP&L's Missouri retail operations prior to September 29, 2015, when a cost adjustment mechanism was approved.mechanisms.  As a result, changes in fuel and purchased power costs are offset in operating revenues increase or decreasewith minimal impact on net income. In addition, SPP network transmission costs fluctuate primarily due to investments by SPP members for upgrades to the transmission grid within the SPP RTO.  As with fuel and purchased power costs, changes in relationSPP network transmission costs are mostly reflected in the prices charged to a significant portioncustomers with minimal impact on net income. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the manner in which Evergy reflects SPP revenues and expenses.
Table of these expenses.  Contents


Management believes that utility gross margin provides a meaningful basis for evaluating electric utility'sthe Evergy Companies' operations across periods compared with operating revenues because utility gross margin excludes the revenue effect of fluctuations in these expenses.  GrossUtility gross margin is used internally to measure performance against budget and in reports for management and the Great Plains EnergyEvergy Board.  The Evergy Companies' definition of utility gross margin may differ from similar terms used by other companies.
ELECTRIC UTILITY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes the electrictables summarize Evergy's utility segment results of operations.gross margin and MWhs sold.
Utility Gross Margin2018 Change 2017 Change 2016
Retail revenues(millions)
Residential$1,578.8
 $777.5
 $801.3
 $(23.9) $825.2
Commercial1,356.4
 644.7
 711.7
 (16.9) 728.6
Industrial527.8
 114.9
 412.9
 7.1
 405.8
Other retail revenues30.6
 7.8
 22.8
 0.8
 22.0
Total electric retail3,493.6
 1,544.9
 1,948.7
 (32.9) 1,981.6
Wholesale revenues404.4
 73.2
 331.2
 14.9
 316.3
Transmission revenues308.1
 23.3
 284.8
 26.1
 258.7
Other revenues69.8
 63.5
 6.3
 0.8
 5.5
Operating revenues4,275.9
 1,704.9
 2,571.0
 8.9
 2,562.1
Fuel and purchased power(1,078.7) (537.2) (541.5) (32.0) (509.5)
SPP network transmission costs(259.9) (12.0) (247.9) (15.1) (232.8)
Utility gross margin (a)
$2,937.3
 $1,155.7
 $1,781.6
 $(38.2) $1,819.8
(a) Utility gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See explanation of utility gross margin above.
  2016 2015 2014 
 (millions)
Operating revenues $2,676.0
 $2,502.2
 $2,568.2
 
Fuel and purchased power (590.1) (608.7) (742.5) 
Transmission (84.8) (89.1) (74.7) 
Other operating expenses (990.2) (940.2) (906.4) 
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar (15.9) 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization (344.8) (330.4) (306.0) 
Operating income 650.2
 533.8
 538.6
 
Non-operating income and expenses 2.3
 1.7
 13.5
 
Interest charges (196.1) (190.9) (183.0) 
Income tax expense (164.3) (120.8) (125.6) 
Net income $292.1
 $223.8
 $243.5
 
Reconciliation of gross margin to operating revenue:       
Operating revenues $2,676.0
 $2,502.2
 $2,568.2
 
Fuel and purchased power (590.1) (608.7) (742.5) 
Transmission (84.8) (89.1) (74.7) 
Gross margin (a)
 $2,001.1
 $1,804.4
 $1,751.0
 
MWh Sales2018 Change 2017 Change 2016
Retail MWh Sales(thousands)
Residential12,478
 6,315
 6,163
 (271) 6,434
Commercial14,129
 6,761
 7,368
 (176) 7,544
Industrial7,426
 1,737
 5,689
 190
 5,499
Other retail revenues110
 37
 73
 (4) 77
Total electric retail34,143
 14,850
 19,293
 (261) 19,554
Wholesale revenues13,811
 3,465
 10,346
 2,047
 8,299
Operating revenues47,954
 18,315
 29,639
 1,786
 27,853
Evergy's utility gross margin increased $1,155.7 million in 2018 compared to 2017 driven by:
an $1,181.5 million increase due to the inclusion of KCP&L's and GMO's utility gross margin beginning in June 2018; and
a $75.0 million increase primarily due to higher Westar Energy retail sales driven by warmer spring and summer weather and colder winter weather. For 2018 compared to 2017, cooling degree days increased 31% and heating degree days increased 23%; partially offset by
a $69.8 million provision for rate refund recorded at Westar Energy for the change in the corporate income tax rate caused by the passage of the TCJA. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information; and
a $31.0 million reduction in revenue recorded at Westar Energy for one-time and annual bill credits as a result of conditions in the KCC merger order. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Evergy's utility gross margin decreased $38.2 million in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to lower Westar Energy retail sales driven by milder weather. For 2017 compared to 2016, cooling degree days decreased 13%.
Table of Contents


Other Operating Expenses (including operating and maintenance expense and taxes other than income tax)
Evergy's other operating expenses increased $653.8 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by:
a $453.0 million increase in operating and maintenance expense due to the inclusion of KCP&L's and GMO's operating and maintenance expenses beginning in June 2018, excluding the deferral of merger transition costs discussed below;
$69.5 million of merger-related costs incurred following the close of the merger in June 2018, consisting of:
(a)
Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation$24.7 million of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.
Table of Contents


Electric Utility Gross Margin and MWh Sales
The following tables summarize electric utility's gross margin and MWhs sold.
   %   %   
Gross Margin (a)
2016 
Change(c)
 2015 
Change(c)
 2014 
Retail revenues(millions) 
Residential$1,092.5
 9
 $1,006.2
 (2) $1,025.5
 
Commercial1,066.0
 6
 1,001.0
 1
 995.2
 
Industrial229.6
 3
 222.3
 (1) 225.3
 
Other retail revenues20.9
 3
 20.4
 
 20.3
 
Provision for rate refund(9.6) N/M
 
 
 
 
Energy efficiency (MEEIA)(b)
80.0
 55
 51.5
 81
 28.5
 
Total retail2,479.4
 8
 2,301.4
 
 2,294.8

Wholesale revenues142.0
 (3) 147.1
 (34) 222.6
 
Other revenues54.6
 2
 53.7
 6
 50.8
 
Operating revenues2,676.0
 7
 2,502.2
 (3) 2,568.2

Fuel and purchased power(590.1) (3) (608.7) (18) (742.5) 
Transmission(84.8) (5) (89.1) 19
 (74.7) 
Gross margin$2,001.1
 11
 $1,804.4
 3
 $1,751.0

(a)
Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.unconditional charitable contributions and community support recorded by Evergy in accordance with conditions in the KCC and MPSC merger orders;
(b)
Consists$44.2 million of recoveryWestar Energy change in control payments, Westar Energy voluntary severance and the recording of programunrecognized equity compensations costs and the incremental fair value associated with the vesting of $49.3 million, $42.9 millionoutstanding Westar Energy equity compensation awards in accordance with the Amended Merger Agreement; and $20.7 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that have a direct offset in utility operating and maintenance expenses, recovery of throughput disincentive of $15.1 million, $8.6 million and $7.8 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and a performance incentive of $15.6 million for 2016.
(c)
N/M - not meaningful$48.4 million of merger consulting fees and fees for other outside services incurred, primarily consisting of merger success fees; partially offset by
a $47.8 million decrease in operating and maintenance expense due to the deferral of merger transition costs to a regulatory asset in June 2018 for future recovery by Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO in accordance with the KCC and MPSC merger orders;
   %   %   
MWh Sales2016 Change 2015 Change 2014 
Retail MWh sales(thousands) 
Residential8,774
 2
 8,585
 (4) 8,971
 
Commercial10,796
 
 10,777
 (1) 10,827
 
Industrial3,149
 (1) 3,191
 
 3,200
 
Other retail MWh sales115
 (1) 116
 (1) 117
 
Total retail22,834
 1
 22,669
 (2) 23,115
 
Wholesale MWh sales7,063
 9
 6,512
 (14) 7,587
 
Total MWh sales29,897
 3
 29,181
 (5) 30,702
 
Electric utility's residential customers' usage is significantly affected by weather. Bulk power sales,a $95.3 million increase in taxes other than income taxes due to the major componentinclusion of wholesale sales, vary with system requirements, generating unit availability, transmission availability, fuel costs,KCP&L and requirements of other electric systems. Electric utility's revenues contain certain recovery mechanisms as follows:
KCP&L's Kansas retail rates contain an Energy Cost Adjustment (ECA) tariff. The ECA tariff reflects the projected annualGMO amounts of fuel, purchased power, emission allowances and asset-based off-system sales margin. These projected amounts are subject to quarterly re-forecasts. Any difference between the ECA revenue collected and the actual ECA amounts for a given year (which may be positive or negative) is recorded either as a reduction of fuel and purchased power expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction of retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to Kansas retail customers over twelve months beginning April 1 of the succeeding year.
KCP&L's Kansas retail rates contain a Transmission Delivery Charge (TDC) rider. The TDC tariff reflects a mixture of historical and projected costs related to transmission service, certain RTO fees, transmission rate base, and transmission operating and maintenance expense. These costs are subject to an annual true-up with a twelve month recovery period. The TDC true-up is recorded either as a reduction of transmission expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction of retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and deferred as a
Table of Contents


regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to KCP&L's Kansas electric retail customers. The TDC became effective in conjunction with new retail rates on October 1, 2015.
KCP&L's Missouri retail rates contain a Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC) tariff under which 95% of the difference between actual fuel cost, purchased power costs, certain transmission costs and off-system sales margin and the amount provided in base rates for these costs is passed along to KCP&L's customers. The FAC cycle consists of an accumulation period of six months beginning in January and July with FAC rate approval requested every six months for a twelve month recovery period. The FAC is recorded either as a reduction of fuel and purchased power expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction of retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to KCP&L's electric retail customers. The FAC became effective in conjunction with new retail rates on September 29, 2015.
GMO's electric retail rates contain a FAC tariff under which 95% of the difference between actual fuel cost, purchased power costs, certain transmission costs and off-system sales margin and the amount provided in base rates for these costs is passed along to GMO's customers. The FAC cycle consists of an accumulation period of six months beginning in June 2018;
$12.3 million of obsolete inventory write-offs for Westar Energy's Unit 7 at Tecumseh Energy Center, Units 3 and December with FAC rate approval requested every six months for 4 at Murray Gill Energy Center and Units 1 and 2 at Gordon Evans Energy Center, which were retired in the fourth quarter of 2018; and
a twelve month recovery period. The FAC is recorded either as a reduction of fuel and purchased power expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction of retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to GMO's electric retail customers.
GMO's steam rates contain a Quarterly Cost Adjustment (QCA) under which 85% of the difference between actual fuel costs and base fuel costs is passed along to GMO's steam customers. The QCA is recorded either as a reduction of fuel and purchased power expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction of retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to GMO's steam customers.
Both KCP&L and GMO offer energy efficiency and demand side management programs to their Missouri retail customers under MEEIA and recover program costs, throughput disincentive and as applicable, certain performance incentives in retail rates. KCP&L and GMO recover these items through a rider mechanism. For program costs, the difference between the amount collected and actual program costs is recorded either as a reduction to utility operating and maintenance expense (for under-recoveries) or a reduction to retail revenues (for over-recoveries) and is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to customers. For throughput disincentive, the difference between the amount collected and the actual throughput disincentive is recorded as an increase to or reduction of retail revenues and is deferred as a regulatory asset or liability to be recovered from or refunded to customers. The performance incentive is recorded as an increase to retail revenues and a receivable to be recovered from customers.
Electric utility's gross margin increased $196.7 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily driven by:
an estimated $111$5.5 million increase due to new retail rates and an estimated $37Westar Energy's 47% share of voluntary severance expenses incurred related to the Wolf Creek voluntary exit program.
Evergy's other operating expenses decreased $47.8 million increasein 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by:
a $24.2 million decrease in Westar Energy's property tax expense due to new cost recovery mechanismsa decrease in amortization of the regulatory asset comprised of actual costs incurred for KCP&Lproperty taxes in Missouri effective September 29, 2015, andthe prior year in Kansas effective October 1, 2015;excess of amounts collected in prices in the prior year, which is mostly offset in retail revenues;
an estimated $38$8.6 million increasedecrease in Westar Energy's transmission and distribution expense due to warmer weatherhigher grid resiliency costs in 2016 and receiving credit for assisting other utilities with a 16% increase in cooling degree days in 2016;
a $6.4 million increase for recovery of program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA,mutual aid during an active hurricane season, which have a direct offset in utilityoffsets operating and maintenance expense;
a $6.5$7.1 million decrease in Westar Energy's employee at-risk compensation that is payable only upon meeting pre-established operating and financial objectives;
a $5.8 million decrease in Westar Energy's nuclear operating and maintenance costs primarily due to receiving a legal settlement related to Wolf Creek in 2017; and
a $4.9 million decrease in Westar Energy's operating and maintenance expense at coal fired plants primarily due to a planned outage at Jeffrey Energy Center in 2016; partially offset by
an $8.8 million increase in MEEIA throughput disincentive;
a $15.6 million MEEIA performance incentive recognized in 2016 relatedWestar Energy's operating and maintenance expense due to the achievementstart of certain energy savings levelsoperations at the Western Plains Wind Farm in March 2017.
Depreciation and Amortization
Evergy's depreciation and amortization increased $247.1 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by a $227.9 million increase due to the first cycleinclusion of KCP&L's and GMO's MEEIA programs;depreciation expense beginning in June 2018.
Evergy's depreciation and amortization increased $33.2 million in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by the start of operations at Westar Energy's Western Plains Wind Farm in March 2017.
Table of Contents


Other Income (Expense), Net
Evergy's other expense, net increased $27.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by:
a $25.7 million increase due to the inclusion of KCP&L and GMO amounts beginning in June 2018; and
an estimated $9a $4.6 million decrease in Westar Energy's investment earnings primarily due to a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand.interest and dividend income.
Table of Contents


Electric utility's gross marginEvergy's other expense, net increased $53.4$25.3 million in 20152017 compared to 20142016 primarily driven by:
an estimated $36a $26.3 million decrease in Westar Energy's other income primarily consisting of:
a $19.5 million decrease due to recording higher corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) benefits in 2016; and
a $9.6 million decrease in equity allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC); partially offset by
a $3.5 million increase related to the deconsolidation of the trust holding Westar Energy's 8% interest in Jeffrey Energy Center.
Interest Expense
Evergy's interest expense increased $108.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by a $102.8 million increase due to new retail rates for KCP&L in Missouri effective September 29, 2015, and in Kansas effective July 25, 2014 and October 1, 2015;
a $22.2 million increase for recovery of program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, which have a direct offset in utility operating and maintenance expense, primarily due to the implementationinclusion of KCP&L's MEEIA programsand GMO's interest expense beginning in August 2014;June 2018 and Evergy's assumption of Great Plains Energy's $350.0 million of 4.85% unsecured Senior Notes and $287.5 million of 5.292% unsecured Senior Notes upon the consummation of the merger.
a $7.2Evergy's interest expense increased $9.3 million increase for recovery of renewable energy costs under RESRAM, which have a direct offset in utility operating and maintenance expense;
an estimated $6 million increase from weather-normalized retail demand;
an estimated $20 million increase in other margin items including a change in customer mix, lower fuel and purchased power expenses that are not included in fuel recovery mechanisms and2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by an increase in transmission costs recovered throughWestar Energy's interest expense on long-term debt of $4.9 million as a result of the transmission delivery charge rider that beganissuance of first mortgage bonds (FMBs) in excess of retirements and a $4.4 million decrease in debt AFUDC.
Income Tax Expense
Evergy's income tax expense decreased $92.2 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by:
a $53.4 million decrease related to the fourth quarterrevaluation of 2015;Westar Energy's deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the Evergy composite tax rate as a result of the merger;
an estimated $19a $58.4 million decrease due to lower wholesale marginsWestar Energy pre-tax income; and
a $44.3 million decrease in Westar Energy's income tax expense as a result of the decrease in the federal statutory income tax rate in 2018; partially offset by an estimated $14
a $63.2 million dueincrease as a result of the inclusion of income tax expense related to lower fuelEvergy, Inc. and purchased powerthe subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy beginning in June 2018.
Evergy's income tax expense at KCP&Ldecreased $33.3 million in Missouri, where there was no fuel recovery mechanism prior2017 compared to September 29, 2015;2016 primarily driven by:
an estimated $9a $24.0 million decrease due to higher transmission expense;production tax credits, primarily due to the start of operations at Westar Energy's Western Plains Wind Farm in March 2017; and
an estimated $24a $22.9 million decrease due to weather driven by a 19% decrease in heating degree days in 2015 and a 15% decrease in cooling degree days in the second quarter of 2015lower Westar Energy pre-tax income; partially offset by an 18% increase in cooling degree days in the third quarter of 2015.
The following table provides cooling degree days (CDD) and heating degree days (HDD) for the last three years at the Kansas City International Airport. CDD and HDD are used to reflect the demand for energy to cool or heat homes and buildings.
   %   %  
 2016 Change 2015 Change 2014
          
CDD1,585 16 1,370 8 1,266
          
HDD4,296 (6) 4,578 (19) 5,666
          
Electric Utility Other Operating Expenses (including utility operating and maintenance expenses, general taxes and other)
Electric utility's other operating expenses increased $50.0 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily driven by:
a $4.8$12.2 million increase in pension expense correspondingrelated to the resettingrevaluation of pension expense trackers withWestar Energy's deferred income taxes not included in rate base as a result of the effective dateenactment of new retail rates;
a $6.4 million increasethe TCJA in program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, which have a direct offset in revenue;2017.
a $4.9 million increase in plant operating and maintenance expense;
a $7.9 million increase in injuries and damages expense primarily due to an increase in estimated losses from an unfavorable judgment in ongoing litigation; and
a $13.7 million increase in general taxes driven by higher property taxes and higher gross receipts taxes due to an increase in retail revenues.


Electric utility's other operating expenses increased $33.8 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily driven by:
a $22.2 million increase in program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, which have a direct offset in revenue, primarily due to the implementation of KCP&L's MEEIA programs in August 2014;
a $7.2 million increase in amortization of deferred renewable energy costs under RESRAM, which have a direct offset in revenue;
an $8.7 million increase in general taxes driven by higher property taxes; and
a $10.0 million decrease in Wolf Creek operating and maintenance expenses primarily due to decreased refueling outage amortization of $3.6 million and $8.7 million from a planned mid-cycle maintenance outage in 2014.
Electric Utility Costs to Achieve the Anticipated Acquisition of Westar
Electric utility's costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar of $15.9 million in 2016 reflects consulting fees, certain severance expenses and other transition costs related to the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
Electric Utility Depreciation and Amortization
Electric utility's depreciation and amortization expense increased $14.4 million and $24.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015 and 2015 compared to 2014, respectively, due to capital additions.
Electric Utility Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Electric utility's non-operating income and expenses decreased $11.8 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to a $13.2 million decrease in the equity component of AFUDC primarily due to a lower average construction work in progress in 2015 due to environmental upgrades at KCP&L's La Cygne Station being placed into service.

Electric Utility Interest Charges
Electric utility's interest charges increased $5.2 million in2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a $7.9 million increase in interest expense related to KCP&L's issuance of $350 million of 3.65% Senior Notes in August 2015; partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in interest expense due to KCP&L's purchase in lieu of redemption of its $50.0 million and $21.9 million EIRR Series 2005 bonds in September 2015.
Electric utility's interest charges increased $7.9 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to a $7.2 million decrease in in the equity component of AFUDC primarily due to a lower average construction work in progress in 2015 due to environmental upgrades at KCP&L's La Cygne Station being placed into service.

Electric Utility Income Tax Expense
Electric utility's income tax expense increased $43.5 million in 2016 compared to 2015 due to increased pre-tax income. Electric utility's income tax expense decreased $4.8 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to decreased pre-tax income.
GREAT PLAINS ENERGYEVERGY SIGNIFICANT BALANCE SHEET CHANGES
(December 31, 20162018 compared to December 31, 2015)2017)
The following table summarizes Evergy's significant balance sheet changes.
 
Total
Change
 Change Due to Merger 
Remaining
Change
Assets(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents$156.9
 $1,154.2
 $(997.3)
Accounts receivable, net(97.0) 155.6
 (252.6)
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral365.0
 180.0
 185.0
Fuel inventories and supplies217.4
 271.5
 (54.1)
Income taxes receivable68.0
 0.5
 67.5
Regulatory assets - current204.4
 207.8
 (3.4)
Prepaid expenses and other assets39.3
 182.1
 (142.8)
Property, plant and equipment, net9,228.7
 9,179.7
 49.0
Property, plant and equipment of variable interest entities, net(7.1) 
 (7.1)
Regulatory assets1,072.5
 829.1
 243.4
Nuclear decommissioning trust235.0
 261.3
 (26.3)
Goodwill2,338.9
 2,338.9
 
Other151.7
 145.5
 6.2
Liabilities     
Current maturities of long-term debt705.4
 415.3
 290.1
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities1.8
 
 1.8
Notes payable and commercial paper462.9
 561.0
 (98.1)
Collateralized note payable365.0
 180.0
 185.0
Accounts payable247.3
 191.4
 55.9
Accrued dividends(53.8) 59.4
 (113.2)
Accrued taxes45.9
 82.0
 (36.1)
Accrued interest38.2
 48.0
 (9.8)
Regulatory liabilities - current98.6
 17.7
 80.9
Asset retirement obligations - current24.7
 46.0
 (21.3)
Other current liabilities107.5
 73.1
 34.4
Long-term debt, net2,948.7
 3,358.6
 (409.9)
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net(30.3) 
 (30.3)
Deferred income taxes783.5
 669.6
 113.9
Unamortized investment tax credits116.1
 124.3
 (8.2)
Regulatory liabilities1,124.8
 1,172.9
 (48.1)
Pension and post-retirement liability496.4
 477.3
 19.1
Asset retirement obligations257.3
 366.1
 (108.8)
Other long-term liabilities103.4
 83.1
 20.3
Change Due to Merger as reflected in the table above represents the preliminary purchase price allocation to Great Plains Energy's assets and liabilities as of June 4, 2018. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding changes in Evergy's balance sheet due to the merger.


The following are significant balance sheet changes in addition to those due to the Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy merger:
Evergy's cash and cash equivalents decreased $997.3 million primarily due to the repurchase of common stock for a total cost of approximately $1,042 million in connection with Evergy's share repurchase program. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on Evergy's share repurchase program.
Evergy's receivables, net decreased $252.6 million primarily due to Westar Energy's entry into a receivable sale facility in December 2018 for an initial amount $185.0 million. This sale of the undivided percentage ownership interest in accounts receivable resulted in the reduction of receivables, net and an increase in accounts receivables pledged as collateral and collateralized note payable of $185.0 million. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding Westar Energy's receivable sale facility.
Evergy's receivables pledged as collateral and collateralized note payable increased $1,281.8$185.0 million due to Westar Energy's entry into a portion of the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's October 2016 common stockreceivable sale facility in December 2018.
Evergy's fuel inventories and depositary share offerings.
Great Plains Energy's time deposit increased $1,000.0supplies decreased $54.1 million primarily due to an investment made with a portion$31.0 million of obsolete inventory write-offs at Westar Energy's Unit 7 at Tecumseh Energy Center, Units 3 and 4 at Murray Gill Energy Center, Units 1 and 2 at Gordon Evans Energy Center, KCP&L's Montrose Station and GMO's Sibley Station, which were all retired in the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's October 2016 common stock and depositary share offerings.fourth quarter of 2018.
Great Plains Energy's derivative instruments - current assetsEvergy's income taxes receivable increased $80.7$67.5 million primarily due to a $79.3refundable alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits that Evergy expects to receive in 2019.
Evergy's prepaid expenses and other assets decreased $142.8 million mark-to-market gain onprimarily due to the $140.6 million settlement of deal contingent interest rate swaps entered into by Great Plains Energy that settled following the consummation of the merger in June 20162018.
Evergy's regulatory assets increased by $243.4 million primarily due to hedge against interest rate fluctuations on future issuancesthe reclassification of long-term debt expectedretired generating plant of $159.9 million related to be issuedGMO's Sibley No. 3 Unit from property, plant and equipment, net to finance a portionregulatory asset upon the retirement of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.unit in 2018.


Great Plains Energy's commercial paper increased $110.8 million due to an increase in commercial paper of $158.2 million at GMO due to borrowings for capital expenditures and general corporate purposes partially offset by the repayment of $47.4 million of commercial paper at KCP&L with funds from operations.
Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's current maturities of long-term debt increased $381.0by $290.1 million and long-term debt decreased $379.9 millionprimarily due to the reclassification of KCP&L's $250.0KGE's $300.0 million of 5.85% Senior Notes and $31.0 million of 1.25% EIRR6.70% Series 1992 bonds and Great Plains Energy's $100.0 million of 6.875% Senior NotesFirst Mortgage Bonds from long-term to current.
Great Plains Energy's deferred income taxes increased $170.9Evergy's notes payable and commercial paper decreased $98.1 million primarily due to an increase in temporary differencesthe repayment of commercial paper with funds from operations at KCP&L and changes in the projected utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, primarily driven by bonus depreciation.GMO.
Great Plains Energy's asset retirement obligationsEvergy's accounts payable increased $40.1$55.9 million primarily due to an increasethe timing of cash payments.
Evergy's accrued dividends decreased $113.2 million due to Evergy's assumption and subsequent payment of Great Plains Energy's $59.4 million of accrued common stock dividends following the consummation of the merger and the timing of payment between Evergy's common stock dividend declared in cost estimatesNovember 2018, which was paid in December 2018, and its common stock dividend declared in November 2017, which was paid in January 2018 and was reflected as accrued dividends of $53.8 million as of December 31, 2017.
Evergy's current regulatory liabilities increased $80.9 million primarily due to $71.2 million of refund obligations recorded by KCP&L and GMO consisting of $63.7 million related to the TCJA and $7.5 million related to one-time customer merger bill credits.
Evergy's current asset retirement obligations decreased $21.3 million primarily due to lower expected cash flows in the next twelve months as of December 31, 2018, compared to December 31, 2017, related to closure costs for the closure of ponds and landfills containing coal combustion residuals (CCRs) at KCP&L electric generating facilities.La Cygne Station and Iatan Station.
Great Plains Energy's common stock increased $1,570.3


Evergy's long-term debt decreased by $409.9 million primarily due to $1.55 billionthe reclassification of KGE's $300.0 million of 6.70% Series First Mortgage Bonds from long-term to current and the redemption of $104.0 million of GMO's Series A and B Senior Notes in 2018.
Evergy's long-term debt of variable interest entities, net proceeds from Great Plains Energy's public offering of 60.5decreased $30.3 million shares of common stock in October 2016.
Great Plains Energy's cumulative preferred stock $100 par value decreased $39.0 millionprimarily due to the redemption of its 390,000 shares of outstanding cumulative preferred stock in August 2016.VIE that holds the La Cygne Unit 2 leasehold interest having made principal payments totaling $28.5 million.
Great Plains Energy's preference stock without par valueEvergy's deferred income taxes increased $836.2$113.9 million primarily due to the issuancereclassification of Series B Preferred Stockrefundable AMT credits that Evergy expects to receive in conjunction with Great Plains2019 to income taxes receivable.
Evergy's asset retirement obligations decreased $108.8 million primarily due to a $127.0 million decrease in Evergy's and Westar Energy's October 2016 depositaryAROs for a revision in estimate primarily related to Westar Energy's ARO to decommission its 47% ownership share offering.of Wolf Creek. See Note 146 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND LIQUIDITYRESOURCES 
Great Plains Energy operates throughEvergy relies primarily upon cash from operations, short-term borrowings, debt issuances and its subsidiaries and has no material assets other than the stock of its subsidiaries andexisting cash and cash equivalents and a time deposit to be used to fund a portionits capital requirements. Evergy's capital requirements primarily consist of capital expenditures, payment of contractual obligations and other commitments, the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.  Great Plains Energy's ability to make payments on its debt securities and its ability to pay dividends is dependent on its receiptpayment of dividends to shareholders and the repurchase of common shares.
Capital Sources
Cash Flows from Operations
Evergy's cash flows from operations are driven by the regulated sale of electricity. These cash flows are relatively stable but the timing and level of these cash flows can vary based on weather and economic conditions, future regulatory proceedings, the timing of cash payments made for costs recoverable under regulatory mechanisms and the time such costs are recovered, and unanticipated expenses such as unplanned plant outages and/or other distributions from its subsidiaries, proceeds from the issuancestorms.
Short-Term Borrowings
As of its securities and borrowing under its revolving credit facility.
Great Plains Energy's capital requirements are principally comprised of debt maturities and electric utility's construction and other capital expenditures.  These items as well as additional cash and capital requirements, including the anticipated acquisition of Westar, are discussed below.
Great Plains Energy's liquid resources at December 31, 2016, consisted of $1.32018, Evergy had $1.7 billion of cash and cash equivalents on hand, a $1.0 billion time deposit that matures in the first quarter of 2017 and $912.1 million of available borrowing capacity from unused bank lines ofits master credit facility and receivable sale agreements.facilities. Westar Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's borrowing capacity under the master credit facility also support their issuance of commercial paper. The available borrowing capacity consisted of $199.0$449.0 million from Great Plains Energy's revolvingEvergy, Inc.'s master credit facility, $464.3$570.0 million from Westar Energy's credit facilities, $420.4 million from KCP&L's credit facilities and $248.8$297.9 million from GMO's credit facilities. See Notes 4 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding the receivable sale agreementsfacilities and revolvingmaster credit facilities,facility, respectively. Generally, Great Plains EnergyAlong with cash flows from operations, Evergy generally uses these liquid resources to meet its day-to-day cash flow requirements,requirements.
Long-Term Debt and fromEquity Issuances
From time to time, Evergy issues equitylong-term debt and/or long-term debtequity to repay short-term debt, refinance maturing long-term debt and finance growth. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Evergy’s capital structure, excluding short-term debt, was as follows:
 December 31
 2018 2017
Common equity57% 51%
Noncontrolling interests<0% <0%
Long-term debt, including VIEs43% 49%
After the completion of its common stock repurchase program, Evergy anticipates targeting a common equity to total capitalization ratio of approximately 47%-50%. Following the utilization of its excess cash and cash equivalents discussed further below, Evergy anticipates issuing debt in 2019 in support of its common stock


repurchase program. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Requirements - Common Stock Repurchase Program" for additional information.
Under stipulations with the MPSC and KCC, Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L are required to maintain common equity at not less than 35%, 40% and 40%, respectively, of total capitalization. The master credit facility and certain debt instruments of the Evergy Companies also contain restrictions that require the maintenance of certain capitalization and leverage ratios. As of December 31, 2018, the Evergy Companies were in compliance with these covenants.
Significant Debt Issuances
See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding significant debt issuances.
Credit Ratings
The ratings of the Evergy Companies' debt securities by the credit rating agencies impact their liquidity, including the cost of borrowings under their master credit facility and in the capital markets. The Evergy Companies view maintenance of strong credit ratings as vital to their access to and cost of debt financing and, to that end, maintain an active and ongoing dialogue with the agencies with respect to results of operations, financial position and future prospects. While a decrease in these credit ratings would not cause any acceleration of the Evergy Companies' debt, it could increase interest charges under the master credit facility. A decrease in credit ratings could also have, among other things, an adverse impact, which could be material, on the Evergy Companies' access to capital, the cost of funds, the ability to recover actual interest costs in state regulatory proceedings, the type and amounts of collateral required under supply agreements and Evergy's ability to provide credit support for its subsidiaries.


As of February 21, 2019, the major credit rating agencies rated the Evergy Companies' securities as detailed in the following table.
Moody'sS&P Global
Investors Service(a)
Ratings(a)
Evergy
OutlookStableStable
Corporate Credit Rating--A-
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa2BBB+
Westar Energy
OutlookStableStable
Corporate Credit RatingBaa1A-
Senior Secured DebtA2A
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
KGE
OutlookStableStable
Corporate Credit RatingBaa1A-
Senior Secured DebtA2A
Short-Term RatingP-2A-2
KCP&L
OutlookStableStable
Corporate Credit RatingBaa1A-
Senior Secured DebtA2A
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1A-
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
GMO
OutlookStableStable
Corporate Credit RatingBaa2A-
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa2A-
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
(a)A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or increase cash balances. However,hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the $1.3assigning rating agency.
Shelf Registration Statements and Regulatory Authorizations
Evergy
In November 2018, Evergy filed an automatic shelf registration statement providing for the sale of unlimited amounts of securities with the SEC, which expires in November 2021.

Westar Energy
In November 2018, Westar Energy filed an automatic shelf registration statement providing for the sale of unlimited amounts of unsecured debt securities and first mortgage bonds with the SEC, which expires in November 2021.
KCP&L
In November 2018, KCP&L filed an automatic shelf registration statement providing for the sale of unlimited amounts of unsecured notes and mortgage bonds with the SEC, which expires in November 2021.


The following table summarizes the regulatory short-term and long-term debt financing authorizations for Westar Energy, KGE, KCP&L and GMO and the remaining amount available under these authorizations as of December 31, 2018.
Type of AuthorizationCommissionExpiration DateAuthorization AmountAvailable Under Authorization
Westar Energy & KGE  (in millions)
Short-Term DebtFERCDecember 2020$1,250.0$838.3
KCP&L   
Short-Term DebtFERCDecember 2020$1,250.0$1,073.1
Long-Term DebtMPSCSeptember 2019$750.0$450.0
GMO    
Short-Term DebtFERCDecember 2020$750.0$600.0
Long-Term DebtFERCDecember 2020$100.0$100.0
In addition to the above regulatory authorizations, the Westar Energy, KGE and KCP&L mortgages each contain provisions restricting the amount of FMBs that can be issued by each entity. Westar Energy, KGE and KCP&L must comply with these restrictions prior to the issuance of additional FMBs, general mortgage bonds or other secured indebtedness.
Under the Westar Energy mortgage, the issuance of bonds is subject to limitations based on the amount of bondable property additions. In addition, so long as any bonds issued prior to January 1, 1997, remain outstanding, the mortgage prohibits additional FMBs from being issued, except in connection with certain refundings, unless Westar Energy’s unconsolidated net earnings available for interest, depreciation and property retirement (which as defined, does not include earnings or losses attributable to the ownership of securities of subsidiaries), for a period of 12 consecutive months within 15 months preceding the issuance, are not less than the greater of twice the annual interest charges on or 10% of the principal amount of all FMBs outstanding after giving effect to the proposed issuance. As of December 31, 2018, $344.5 million principal amount of additional FMBs could be issued under the most restrictive provisions in the mortgage, except in connection with certain refundings.
Under the KGE mortgage, the amount of FMBs authorized is limited to a maximum of $3.5 billion and the issuance of bonds is subject to limitations based on the amount of bondable property additions. In addition, the mortgage prohibits additional FMBs from being issued, except in connection with certain refundings, unless KGE’s net earnings before income taxes and before provision for retirement and depreciation of property for a period of 12 consecutive months within 15 months preceding the issuance are not less than either two and one-half times the annual interest charges on or 10% of the principal amount of all KGE FMBs outstanding after giving effect to the proposed issuance. As of December 31, 2018, KGE had sufficient capacity under the most restrictive provisions in the mortgage to meet its near term financing and refinancing needs.

Under the KCP&L mortgage, additional KCP&L mortgage bonds may be issued on the basis of property additions or retired bonds. As of December 31, 2018, KCP&L had sufficient capacity under the most restrictive provisions in the mortgage to meet its near term financing and refinancing needs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
At December 31, 2018, Evergy had approximately $160.3 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand andhand. Under the $1.0 billion time deposit at December 31, 2016, are primarily the result of Great Plains Energy's equity issuances in October 2016, the proceeds of which are to be used to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
Amended Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy intendswas required to meet day-to-dayhave not less than $1.25 billion in cash flow requirements including interest payments, retirementand cash equivalents on its balance sheet at the closing of maturing debt, construction requirements, dividends and pension benefit plan funding requirementsthe merger with a combinationWestar Energy. In 2018, Evergy primarily utilized this excess cash to repurchase approximately $1,042 million of internally generated funds and proceeds from short-term debt. From timecommon stock. Evergy anticipates that its remaining excess cash will also be returned to time, Great Plains Energy issues equity and/or long-term debt to repay short-term debt or increase cash balances. Great Plainsshareholders through the repurchase of common stock.


Energy's intentionCapital Requirements
Capital Expenditures
Evergy requires significant capital investments and expects to meetneed cash primarily for utility construction programs designed to improve and expand facilities related to providing electric service, which include, but are not limited to, expenditures to develop new transmission lines and improvements to power plants, transmission and distribution lines and equipment. Evergy's capital expenditures were $1,069.7 million, $764.6 million and $1,087.0 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Capital expenditures projected for the next five years, excluding AFUDC and including costs of removal, are detailed in the following table. This capital expenditure plan is subject to continual review and change.
  2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 
 (millions)
Generating facilities $458
 $497
 $383
 $306
 $425
 
Transmission and distribution facilities 678
 714
 706
 712
 705
 
General facilities 142
 127
 94
 89
 66
 
Total utility capital expenditures $1,278
 $1,338
 $1,183
 $1,107
 $1,196
 
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
In the course of its business activities, the Evergy Companies enter into a portionvariety of contracts and commercial commitments. Some of these requirementsresult in direct obligations reflected on Evergy's consolidated balance sheets while others are commitments, some firm and some based on uncertainties, not reflected in Evergy's underlying consolidated financial statements.
The information in the following table is provided to summarize Evergy's cash obligations and commercial commitments.
Payment due by period2019 2020 2021 2022 2023After 2023Total
Long-term debt(millions)
Principal$701.1
 $251.1
 $432.0
 $287.5
 $439.5
 $5,142.9
 $7,254.1
Interest306.3
 281.1
 256.9
 235.4
 222.1
 3,262.6
 4,564.4
Long-term debt of VIEs             
Principal30.3
 32.3
 18.8
 
 
 
 81.4
Interest1.6
 0.8
 0.2
 
 
 
 2.6
Lease commitments             
Operating leases24.2
 20.7
 18.4
 15.2
 12.4
 95.0
 185.9
Capital leases6.4
 2.2
 5.3
 4.7
 4.0
 48.6
 71.2
Pension and other post-retirement plans (a)
118.3
 118.3
 118.3
 118.3
 118.3
 (a)
 591.5
Purchase commitments             
Fuel423.6
 364.4
 95.3
 82.9
 87.5
 116.2
 1,169.9
Power47.3
 47.3
 47.4
 47.6
 47.8
 366.8
 604.2
Other137.8
 18.8
 13.4
 6.8
 2.1
 34.4
 213.3
Total contractual commitments (a)
$1,796.9
 $1,137.0
 $1,006.0
 $798.4
 $933.7
 $9,066.5
 $14,738.5
(a)
Evergy expects to make contributions to the pension and other post-retirement plans beyond 2023 but the amounts are not yet determined.
Long-term debt includes current maturities. Long-term debt principal excludes $57.2 million of unamortized net discounts and debt issuance costs and a $144.8 million fair value adjustment recorded in connection with internally generated funds may be impacted bypurchase accounting for the effect of inflation on operating expenses, the level of MWh sales, regulatory actions, compliance with environmental regulations and the availability of generating units.  In addition, Great Plains Energy may issue equity, equity-linked securities and/and Westar Energy merger. Variable rate interest obligations are based on rates as of December 31, 2018.


Operating lease commitments include leases for office buildings, computer equipment, operating facilities, vehicles and rail cars to serve jointly-owned generating units where Westar Energy or debtKCP&L is the managing partner and is reimbursed by other joint-owners for its proportionate share of the cost. Capital lease commitments include obligations for both principal and interest.
Evergy expects to finance growth. 
For a description of Great Plains Energy's financing activities and the remaining portion of its proposed financing plan with respectcontribute $118.3 million to the anticipated acquisitionpension and other post-retirement plans in 2019, of which the majority is expected to be paid by Westar see Note 2Energy and KCP&L. Additional contributions to the plans are expected beyond 2023 in amounts at least sufficient to meet the greater of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) or regulatory funding requirements; however, these amounts have not yet been determined. Amounts for years after 2019 are estimates based on information available in determining the amount for 2019. Actual amounts for years after 2019 could be significantly different than the estimated amounts in the table above.
Fuel commitments consist of commitments for nuclear fuel, coal and coal transportation costs. Power commitments consist of certain commitments for renewable energy under power purchase agreements. Other represents individual commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Evergy has other insignificant long-term liabilities recorded on its consolidated financial statements.balance sheet at December 31, 2018, which do not have a definitive cash payout date and are not included in the table above.
Great Plains Energy also has a 364-day $5.1 billion senior unsecured bridge term loan facility to support the anticipated acquisition of WestarCommon Stock Dividends
The amount and provide flexibility for timing of dividends payable on Evergy's common stock are within the sole discretion of the Evergy Board. The amount and timing of dividends declared by the Evergy Board will be dependent on considerations such as Evergy's earnings, financial position, cash flows, capitalization ratios, regulation, reinvestment opportunities and debt covenants. Evergy targets a long-term financing.dividend payout ratio of 60% to 70% of earnings. See Note 111 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.information on the common stock dividend declared by the Evergy Board in February 2019.
The Evergy Companies also have certain restrictions stemming from statutory requirements, corporate organizational documents, covenants and other conditions that could affect dividend levels. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of restrictions on dividend payments.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
In July 2018, the Evergy Board authorized the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of Evergy's common stock. Although this repurchase authorization has no expiration date, Evergy expects to repurchase approximately 60 million shares by mid-2020. For 2018, Evergy had total repurchases of common stock of approximately $1,042 million and had repurchased 16.4 million shares under the repurchase program. These repurchase totals include shares repurchased under ASR agreements, one of which had not reached final settlement as of December 31, 2018, and are discussed further below.

In August 2018, Evergy entered into two ASR agreements with financial institutions to purchase $450.0 million of Evergy common stock. The ASR agreements reached final settlement in the fourth quarter of 2018 and resulted in the delivery of 7.9 million shares to Evergy and Evergy paid a total of $450.0 million.

In November 2018, Evergy entered into an ASR agreement with a financial institution to purchase $475.0 million of Evergy common stock. In December 2018, the financial institution delivered to Evergy 6.4 million shares of common stock, representing a partial settlement of the contract, based on then-current market prices and Evergy paid a total of $475.0 million. The ASR agreement is expected to reach final settlement by March 2019 or earlier.

See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for more information regarding Evergy's common stock repurchase program.


Impact of TCJA
The TCJA will result in lower operating cash flows for the Evergy Companies due to lower income tax expense recoveries in customer rates and the settlement of related deferred income tax regulatory liabilities, which are significant. These decreases in operating cash flows are expected to exceed the increase in operating cash flows for the Evergy Companies resulting from the lower corporate federal income tax rate primarily due to the utilization of the Evergy Companies' net operating losses and tax credits. These net regulatory liabilities will be refunded in future rates by amortizing amounts related to plant assets primarily over the remaining useful life of the assets and amortizing the amounts related to the other items over various periods as determined in the Evergy Companies' 2018 rate cases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, Evergy and certain of its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees and letters of credit. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the extension of sufficient credit to accomplish the subsidiary's intended business purposes. In connection with the closing of the merger, Evergy assumed the guarantees previously provided to GMO by Great Plains Energy. The majority of these agreements guarantee Evergy's own future performance, so a liability for the fair value of the obligation is not recorded.
At December 31, 2018, Evergy has provided $111.3 million of credit support for GMO as follows:
Evergy direct guarantees to GMO counterparties totaling $17.0 million, which expire in 2020, and
Evergy's guarantee of GMO long-term debt totaling $94.3 million, which includes debt with maturity dates ranging from 2019 to 2023.
Evergy has also guaranteed GMO's short-term debt, including its commercial paper program. At December 31, 2018, GMO had $150.0 million of commercial paper outstanding. None of the guaranteed obligations are subject to default or prepayment if GMO's credit ratings were downgraded.
The Evergy Companies also have off-balance sheet arrangements in the form of operating leases and letters of credit entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Cash Flows
The following table presents Evergy's cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.
 201820172016
 (in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities$1,497.8
$912.7
$803.8
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities197.4
(780.8)(994.1)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities(1,538.4)(131.6)190.2
Cash Flows from Operating ActivitiesOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, Evergy and certain of its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees and letters of credit. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the extension of sufficient credit to accomplish the subsidiary's intended business purposes. In connection with the closing of the merger, Evergy assumed the guarantees previously provided to GMO by Great Plains Energy generated positive cash flows from operating activitiesEnergy. The majority of these agreements guarantee Evergy's own future performance, so a liability for the periods presented. The $30.9 million increase in cash flows from operating activities for Great Plains Energy in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily driven by new retail rates for KCP&L and warmer weather. Other changes in working capital are detailed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.  The individual components of working capital vary with normal business cycles and operations.
The $54.9 million increase in cash flows from operating activities for Great Plains Energy in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to a $34.2 million increase driven by a decrease in solar rebates paid to customers and an increase in the recovery of costs subject to fuel recovery mechanisms of $76.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in net income of $29.8 million and a decrease driven by deferred refueling outage costs of $23.7 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Great Plains Energy's cash used for investing activities varies with the timing of utility capital expenditures and purchases of investments and nonutility property.  Investing activities are offset by proceeds from the sale of properties and insurance recoveries.
In 2016, Great Plains Energy purchased a time deposit of $1.0 billion with a portionfair value of the proceeds from Great Plains Energy's October 2016 common stock and depositary share offerings.obligation is not recorded.
Great Plains Energy's utility capital expenditures decreased $67.7 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a decrease in cash utility capital expenditures related to infrastructure and system improvements.
Great Plains Energy's utility capital expenditures decreased $96.6 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to a decrease in cash utility capital expenditures related to environmental upgrades at KCP&L's La Cygne Station.
In January 2014, KCP&L and GMO completed the sale of two SPP-approved regional transmission projects, at cost, to Transource Missouri, LLC for cash proceeds of $37.7 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Great Plains Energy's cash flows from financing activities in 2016 reflect gross proceeds of $1.6 billion from the issuance of 60.5 million shares of common stock at a public offering price of $26.45 per share and gross proceeds of $862.5 million from the issuance of 17.3 million depositary shares each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock at $50 per depositary share. Great Plains Energy paid $40.1 million for the redemption of its 390,000 shares of cumulative preferred stock and $143.6 million in issuance fees related to common stock and depositary share issuances, establishing Great Plains Energy's bridge term loan facility and a payment to OMERS pursuant to a stock purchase agreement.
Great Plains Energy's cash flows from financing activities in 2015 reflect KCP&L's issuance, at a discount, of $350.0At December 31, 2018, Evergy has provided $111.3 million of 3.65% Senior Notes that mature in 2025, with the proceeds used to purchase in lieu of redemption $71.9 million of EIRR bonds and repay short-term borrowings.



Great Plains Energy's cash flows from financing activities in 2014 reflect increased short-term borrowings at KCP&L primarily driven by capital expenditures and pension funding contributions.
Impact of Credit Ratings on Liquidity
The ratings of Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's securities by the credit rating agencies impact their liquidity, including the cost of borrowings under their revolving credit agreements and in the capital markets. After the announcement of the anticipated acquisition of Westar, Moody's Investors Service placed its long-term ratings of Great Plains Energy on review for downgrade and Standard & Poors' Ratings Services revised its outlook of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO from stable to negative. The Companies view maintenance of strong credit ratings as extremely important to their access to and cost of debt financing and to that end maintain an active and ongoing dialogue with the agencies with respect to results of operations, financial position and future prospects. While a decrease in these credit ratings would not cause any acceleration of Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's or GMO's debt, it could increase interest charges under Great Plains Energy's 6.875% Senior Notes due 2017 or Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's revolving credit agreements. A decrease in credit ratings could also have, among other things, an adverse impact, which could be material, on Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's access to capital, the cost of funds, the ability to recover actual interest costs in state regulatory proceedings, the type and amounts of collateral required under supply agreements and Great Plains Energy's ability to provide credit support for its subsidiaries.GMO as follows:
AsEvergy direct guarantees to GMO counterparties totaling $17.0 million, which expire in 2020, and
Evergy's guarantee of February 23, 2017, the major credit rating agencies rated Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's andGMO long-term debt totaling $94.3 million, which includes debt with maturity dates ranging from 2019 to 2023.
Evergy has also guaranteed GMO's securities as detailed in the following table.
Moody'sStandard
Investors Service& Poor's
Great Plains Energy
OutlookReview for downgradeNegative
Corporate Credit Rating-BBB+
Preferred StockBa1BBB-
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa2BBB
KCP&L
OutlookStableNegative
Senior Secured DebtA2A
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1BBB+
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
GMO
OutlookStableNegative
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa2BBB+
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.
Financing Authorization
Under stipulations with MPSC and KCC, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L maintain common equity at not less than 30% and 35%, respectively, of total capitalization (including only the amount of short-term debt, in excessincluding its commercial paper program. At December 31, 2018, GMO had $150.0 million of commercial paper outstanding. None of the amount of construction work in progress).  KCP&L's long-term financing activitiesguaranteed obligations are subject to the authorization of the MPSC.  On June 30, 2016, KCP&L's MPSC authorization to issue long-term debt expired. KCP&L will seek new authorizationdefault or prepayment if and when it is deemed necessary.GMO's credit ratings were downgraded.


KCP&L's and GMO's short-term financing activities are subject to the authorization of FERC. In November 2016, FERC authorized KCP&L toThe Evergy Companies also have outstanding at any one time up to a total of $1.0 billion in short-term debt instruments through December 2018. At December 31, 2016, there was $867.1 million available under this authorization. In February 2016, FERC authorized GMO to have outstanding at any one time up to a total of $750.0 million in short-term debt instruments through March 2018. At December 31, 2016, there was $548.1 million available under this authorization.
KCP&L and GMO are also authorized by FERC to participateoff-balance sheet arrangements in the Great Plains Energy money pool, an internal financing arrangement in which funds may be lent on a short-term basis to KCP&Lform of operating leases and GMO.  At December 31, 2016, there were no outstanding payables under the money pool.
Significant Financing Activities
Great Plains Energy
Great Plains Energy has an effective shelf registration statement for the saleletters of unlimited amounts of securities with the SEC that became effective in March 2015 and expires in March 2018. In September 2016, Great Plains Energy filed a post-effective amendment to its shelf registration statement to register depositary shares and preference stock among the types of securities that Great Plains Energy may offer and sell.
In October 2016, Great Plains Energy completed a registered public offering of 60.5 million shares of common stock, without par value, at a public offering price of $26.45 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.6 billion (net proceeds of approximately $1.55 billion after issuance costs). Great Plains Energy plans to use proceeds from the offering to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
In October 2016, Great Plains Energy also completed a registered public offering of 17.3 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock, without par value, at a public offering price of $50 per depositary share for total gross proceeds of $862.5 million (net proceeds of approximately $836.2 million after issuance costs). Great Plains Energy plans to use proceeds from the offering to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
KCP&L
KCP&L has an effective shelf registration statement providing for the sale of unlimited amounts of notes and general mortgage bonds with the SEC that was filed and became effective in March 2015 and expires in March 2018.
In August 2015, KCP&L issued, at a discount, $350.0 million of 3.65% unsecured Senior Notes, maturing in 2025.
Debt Agreements
See Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding revolving credit facilities and term loan facility related to the anticipated acquisition of Westar.


Projected Utility Capital Expenditures
Great Plains Energy's cash utility capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC to finance construction, were $609.4 million, $677.1 million and $773.7 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Utility capital expenditures represent a significant portion of Great Plains Energy's capital requirements. Utility capital expenditures projected for the next four years include improvements to generating, distribution and transmission facilities, software upgrades and expenditures for environmental projects at coal-fired power plants. Great Plains Energy intends to meet these capital requirements with a combination of internally generated funds and proceeds from short-term and long-term debt.
Utility capital expenditures projected for the next four years, excluding AFUDC, are detailed in the following table. This utility capital expenditure plan is subject to continual review and change.
  2017 2018 2019 2020 
 (millions)
Generating facilities $180.5
 $204.3
 $178.0
 $192.7
 
Distribution and transmission facilities 216.5
 192.3
 216.7
 203.5
 
General facilities 106.2
 98.5
 56.7
 69.4
 
Nuclear fuel 44.5
 25.2
 22.9
 50.0
 
Environmental 43.4
 36.6
 11.5
 14.0
 
Total utility capital expenditures $591.1
 $556.9
 $485.8
 $529.6
 
Pensions
The Company incurs significant costs in providing defined benefit plans for substantially all active and inactive employees of KCP&L and GMO and its 47% ownership share of WCNOC's defined benefit plans. Funding of the plans follows legal and regulatory requirements with funding equaling or exceeding the minimum requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
In 2016 and 2015, the Company contributed $69.8 million and $76.9 million to the pension plans, respectively, and expects to contribute $79.6 million in 2017 to satisfy ERISA funding requirements and the MPSC and KCC rate orders, the majority of which is expected to be paid by KCP&L. Additional contributions to the plans are expected beyond 2017 in amounts at least sufficient to meet the greater of ERISA or regulatory funding requirements; however, these amounts have not yet been determined.
Additionally, the Company provides post-retirement health and life insurance benefits for certain retired employees and expects to make benefit contributions of $4.6 million under the provisions of these plans in 2017, the majority of which is expected to be paid by KCP&L.
Management believes the Company has adequate access to capital resources through cash flows from operations or through existing lines of credit to support these funding requirements.


Supplemental Capital Requirements and Liquidity Information
The information in the following table is provided to summarize Great Plains Energy's cash obligations and commercial commitments.
Payment due by period2017 2018 2019 2020 2021After 2021Total
Long-term debt(millions)
Principal$382.1
 $351.1
 $401.1
 $1.1
 $432.0
 $2,197.1
 $3,764.5
Interest182.5
 156.8
 131.3
 116.9
 108.3
 945.9
 1,641.7
Lease commitments             
Operating leases12.9
 11.0
 9.3
 9.7
 9.7
 110.5
 163.1
Capital leases0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 3.1
 5.1
Pension and other post-retirement plans (a)
84.2
 84.2
 84.2
 84.2
 84.2
 (a)
 421.0
Purchase commitments             
Fuel259.0
 145.8
 62.2
 53.8
 11.2
 100.8
 632.8
Power47.3
 47.3
 47.3
 47.3
 47.4
 462.2
 698.8
Other50.1
 32.0
 33.3
 5.9
 6.5
 38.7
 166.5
Total contractual commitments (a)
$1,018.5
 $828.6
 $769.1
 $319.3
 $699.7
 $3,858.3
 $7,493.5
(a)
The Company expects to make contributions to the pension and other post-retirement plans beyond 2021 but the amounts are not yet determined. Amounts for years after 2017 are estimates based on information available in determining the amount for 2017. Actual amounts for years after 2017 could be significantly different than the estimated amounts in the table above.
Long-term debt includes current maturities. Long-term debt principal excludes $17.2 million of net discounts on senior notes and debt issuance costs. Variable rate interest obligations are based on rates as of December 31, 2016.
Lease commitments end in 2048. Operating lease commitments include railcars to serve jointly-owned generating units where KCP&L is the managing partner. Of the amounts included in the table above, KCP&L will be reimbursed by the other owners for approximately $1.5 million in 2017, $1.2 million in 2018 and approximately $0.4 million per year from 2019 to 2025, for a total of $5.5 million.
The Company expects to contribute $84.2 million to the pension and other post-retirement plans in 2017, of which the majority is expected to be paid by KCP&L. Additional contributions to the plans are expected beyond 2021 in amounts at least sufficient to meet the greater of ERISA or regulatory funding requirements; however, these amounts have not yet been determined. Amounts for years after 2017 are estimates based on information available in determining the amount for 2017. Actual amounts for years after 2017 could be significantly different than the estimated amounts in the table above.
Fuel commitments consist of commitments for nuclear fuel, coal and coal transportation costs. Power commitments consist of commitments for renewable energy under power purchase agreements. Other represents individual commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business.

Cash Flows
Great Plains Energy has other insignificant long-term liabilities recorded on its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016, which do not have a definitiveThe following table presents Evergy's cash payout dateflows from operating, investing and are not included in the table above.financing activities.
 201820172016
 (in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities$1,497.8
$912.7
$803.8
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities197.4
(780.8)(994.1)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities(1,538.4)(131.6)190.2
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, Great Plains EnergyEvergy and certain of its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees and letters of credit. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the extension of sufficient credit to accomplish the subsidiary's intended business purposes. In connection with the closing of the merger, Evergy assumed the guarantees previously provided to GMO by Great Plains Energy. The majority of these agreements guarantee the Company'sEvergy's own future performance, so a liability for the fair value of the obligation is not recorded.


At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy2018, Evergy has provided $135.3$111.3 million of credit support for GMO as follows:
Great Plains EnergyEvergy direct guarantees to GMO counterparties totaling $38.7$17.0 million, which expire in 20172020, and 2018 and
Great Plains Energy guaranteesEvergy's guarantee of GMO long-term debt totaling $96.6$94.3 million, which includes debt with maturity dates ranging from 20172019 to 2023.
2023.
Great Plains EnergyEvergy has also guaranteed GMO's short-term debt, including its commercial paper program. At December 31, 2016,2018, GMO had $201.9$150.0 million of commercial paper outstanding. None of the guaranteed obligations are subject to default or prepayment if GMO's credit ratings were downgraded.
At December 31, 2016, KCP&L had issuedThe Evergy Companies also have off-balance sheet arrangements in the form of operating leases and letters of credit totaling $8.8entered into in the ordinary course of business.
Cash Flows
The following table presents Evergy's cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities.
 201820172016
 (in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities$1,497.8
$912.7
$803.8
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities197.4
(780.8)(994.1)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities(1,538.4)(131.6)190.2
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Evergy's $585.1 million increase in cash flows from operating activities in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily driven by an $800.8 million increase due to the inclusion of KCP&L's and GMO's cash flows from operating activities beginning in June 2018; partially offset by an increase of $50.3 million in amounts paid by Westar Energy related to income taxes; $35.6 million of merger success fees paid by Evergy and Westar Energy upon the completion of the merger; an increase of $27.0 million in purchased power costs paid by Westar Energy; an increase of $15.3 million in Wolf Creek refueling outage costs paid by Westar Energy related to the outage that concluded in May 2018 and an $11.6 million increase in Westar Energy pension and post-retirement contributions.
The $108.9 million increase in cash flows from operating activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily driven by a $43.9 million increase in Westar Energy wholesale power sales and transmission services; a $26.3


million decrease in amounts paid for Westar Energy coal and natural gas; a $26.0 million increase due to Westar Energy receiving a $13.0 million refund for income taxes in 2017 and Westar Energy paying $13.0 million in income taxes in 2016 and a $13.6 million increase from Westar Energy retail customers; partially offset by a $16.4 million increase in amounts paid for Westar Energy purchased power and transmission services and a $12.0 million increase in Westar Energy interest payments.
Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities
Evergy's cash flows from investing activities increased $978.2 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to the inclusion of $1,154.2 million of cash acquired from Great Plains Energy as of the merger date.
Evergy's cash flows used in investing activities decreased $213.3 million in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by a $322.3 million decrease in additions to Westar Energy's property, plant and equipment primarily related to the construction of Western Plains Wind Farm in 2016; partially offset by receiving $110.5 million less proceeds from Westar Energy COLI investments than in 2016.
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities
Evergy's cash flows used in financing activities increased $1,406.8 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to the repurchase of common stock of $1,042.3 million as credit supporta result of Evergy's share repurchase program in 2018; an increase in cash dividends paid of $251.9 million due to certain counterpartiesan increase in outstanding shares of common stock following the close of the merger and a $0.06 and $0.075 per share increase in the quarterly dividends paid in September 2018 and December 2018, respectively; an increase in retirements of long-term debt of $270.8 million; partially offset by an increase in collateralized short-term debt, net of $185.0 million due to Westar Energy's receivable sale facility that expirewas entered into in 2017. KCP&L has issued $148.1December 2018.
Evergy's cash flows from financing activities decreased $321.8 million in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to Westar Energy issuing $207.5 million less in commercial paper; Westar Energy issuing $162.0 million less in long-term debt of VIEs; Westar Energy issuing $100.1 million less in long-term debt; Westar Energy's redemption of $75.0 million more in long-term debt and paying $18.8 million more in dividends; partially offset by Westar Energy redeeming $163.5 million less in long-term debt of VIEs and repaying $88.3 million less for borrowings against the cash surrender value of COLI.


WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
MANAGEMENT'S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The below results of operations and related discussion for Westar Energy is presented in a reduced disclosure format in accordance with General Instruction (I)(2)(a) to Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes Westar Energy's comparative results of operations.
 2018 Change 2017
 (millions)
Operating revenues$2,614.9
 $43.9
 $2,571.0
Fuel and purchased power599.2
 57.7
 541.5
SPP network transmission costs259.9
 12
 247.9
Other operating expenses814.4
 83.3
 731.1
Depreciation and amortization390.9
 19.2
 371.7
Income from operations550.5
 (128.3) 678.8
Other income (expense), net(33.5) (6.7) (26.8)
Interest expense176.8
 5.8
 171.0
Income tax expense (benefit)(4.3) (155.5) 151.2
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes4.6
 (2.1) 6.7
Net income349.1
 12.6
 336.5
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests10.2
 (2.4) 12.6
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc.$338.9
 $15.0
 $323.9
Westar Energy Utility Gross Margin and MWh Sales
The following table summarizes Westar Energy's utility gross margin and MWhs sold.
 Revenues and ExpensesMWhs Sold
 2018 Change 2017 2018 Change 2017
Retail revenues(millions)(thousands)
Residential$846.4
 $45.1
 $801.3
 6,736
 573
 6,163
Commercial702.8
 (8.9) 711.7
 7,496
 128
 7,368
Industrial396.4
 (16.5) 412.9
 5,642
 (47) 5,689
Other retail revenues20.0
 (2.8) 22.8
 58
 (15) 73
Total electric retail1,965.6
 16.9
 1,948.7
 19,932
 639
 19,293
Wholesale revenues346.1
 14.9
 331.2
 10,169
 (177) 10,346
Transmission revenues288.9
 4.1
 284.8
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Other revenues14.3
 8.0
 6.3
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Operating revenues2,614.9
 43.9
 2,571.0
 30,101
 462
 29,639
Fuel and purchased power(599.2) (57.7) (541.5)      
SPP network transmission costs(259.9) (12.0) (247.9)      
Utility gross margin (a)
$1,755.8
 $(25.8) $1,781.6
      
(a)
Utility gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See explanation of utility gross margin under Evergy's Results of Operations.
Westar Energy's utility gross margin decreased $25.8 million in 2018 compared to 2017 driven by:
a $69.8 million provision for rate refund for the change in the corporate income tax rate caused by the passage of the TCJA. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information; and


a $31.0 million reduction in revenue for one-time and annual bill credits as a result of conditions in the KCC merger order. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information; partially offset by
a $75.0 million increase primarily due to higher retail sales driven by warmer spring and summer weather and colder winter weather. For 2018 compared to 2017, cooling degree days increased 29% and heating degree days increased 22%.
Westar Energy Other Operating Expenses (including operating and maintenance expense and taxes other than income tax)
Westar Energy's other operating expenses increased $83.3 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by:
$51.9 million of lettersmerger-related costs incurred following the close of creditthe merger in June 2018, consisting of:
$44.2 million of change in control payments, voluntary severance and the recording of unrecognized equity compensation costs and the incremental fair value associated with the vesting of outstanding Westar Energy equity compensation awards in accordance with the Amended Merger Agreement; and
$21.5 million of merger consulting fees and fees for other outside services incurred, primarily consisting of merger success fees; partially offset by
a $13.8 million decrease in operating and maintenance expense due to the net reallocation of incurred merger transition costs between Westar Energy, Evergy, KCP&L and GMO and the subsequent deferral of these transition costs to a regulatory asset in June 2018 for future recovery by Westar Energy in accordance with the KCC merger order;
$12.3 million of obsolete inventory write-offs for Unit 7 at Tecumseh Energy Center, Units 3 and 4 at Murray Gill Energy Center and Units 1 and 2 at Gordon Evans Energy Center, which were retired in 2018; and
a $5.5 million increase due to Westar Energy's 47% share of voluntary severance expenses incurred related to the Wolf Creek voluntary exit program.
Westar Energy Depreciation and Amortization
Westar Energy's depreciation and amortization expense increased $19.2 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by capital additions.
Westar Energy Other Income (Expense), Net
Westar Energy's other expense, net increased $6.7 million in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by:
a $4.6 million decrease in investment earnings primarily due to a decrease in interest and dividend income; and
a $3.5 million increase in pension non-service costs.
Westar Energy Income Tax Expense
Westar Energy's income tax expense decreased $155.5 million in 2018 compared to 2017 driven by:
a $53.4 million decrease related to the revaluation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the Evergy composite tax rate as credit support for its variablea result of the merger;
a $58.4 million decrease due to lower pre-tax income; and
a $44.3 million decrease as a result of the decrease in the federal statutory income tax rate EIRR Bond Series 2007A and B that expire in 2018.
At December 31, 2016, GMO had issued letters


KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
MANAGEMENT'S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The below results of operations and related discussion for KCP&L is presented in a reduced disclosure format in accordance with General Instruction (I)(2)(a) to Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes KCP&L's consolidated comparative results of operations.
  2016 2015 
 (millions)
Operating revenues $1,875.4
 $1,713.8
 
Fuel and purchased power (372.7) (397.1) 
Transmission (56.4) (58.4) 
Other operating expenses (705.8) (658.6) 
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar (10.9) 
 
Depreciation and amortization (247.5) (235.7) 
Operating income 482.1
 364.0
 
Non-operating income and expenses 4.2
 1.2
 
Interest charges (139.4) (135.6) 
Income tax expense (121.9) (76.8) 
Net income $225.0
 $152.8
 
Reconciliation of gross margin to operating revenue:     
Operating revenues $1,875.4
 $1,713.8
 
Fuel and purchased power (372.7) (397.1) 
Transmission (56.4) (58.4) 
Gross margin (a)
 $1,446.3
 $1,258.3
 
(a)
Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.


 2018 Change 2017
 (millions)
Operating revenues$1,823.1
 $(67.6) $1,890.7
Fuel and purchased power520.6
 39.9
 480.7
Other operating expenses611.4
 (45.9) 657.3
Depreciation and amortization281.3
 15.0
 266.3
Income from operations409.8
 (76.6) 486.4
Other income (expense), net(25.9) 13.7
 (39.6)
Interest expense133.7
 (5.1) 138.8
Income tax expense87.3
 (40.9) 128.2
Net income$162.9
 $(16.9) $179.8
KCP&L Utility Gross Margin and MWh Sales
The following table summarizes KCP&L's utility gross margin and MWhs sold.
Revenues and Costs % MWhs Sold %Revenues and Expenses MWhs Sold
2016 2015 
Change(c)
 2016 2015 Change2018 Change 2017 2018 Change 2017
Retail revenues(millions)   (thousands)  (millions) (thousands)
Residential$713.0
 $639.9
 11
 5,330
 5,213
 2
$735.6
 10.3
 $725.3
 5,686
 504
 5,182
Commercial798.5
 738.7
 8
 7,553
 7,569
 
794.8
 (49.6) 844.4
 7,782
 316
 7,466
Industrial147.4
 137.8
 7
 1,839
 1,833
 
138.8
 (22.2) 161.0
 1,754
 (61) 1,815
Other retail revenues13.1
 12.5
 6
 83
 83
 
10.4
 (0.8) 11.2
 76
 4
 72
Provision for rate refund0.8
 
 N/M
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Energy efficiency (MEEIA)(a)
50.9
 27.5
 85
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Total retail1,723.7
 1,556.4
 11
 14,805
 14,698
 1
Total electric retail1,679.6
 (62.3) 1,741.9
 15,298
 763
 14,535
Wholesale revenues128.9
 134.1
 (4) 6,629
 6,099
 9
53.5
 (34.5) 88.0
 5,017
 (1,771) 6,788
Transmission revenues14.5
 (1.5) 16.0
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Other revenues22.8
 23.3
 (2) N/A
 N/A
 N/A
75.5
 30.7
 44.8
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
Operating revenues1,875.4
 1,713.8
 9
 21,434
 20,797
 3
1,823.1
 (67.6) 1,890.7
 20,315
 (1,008) 21,323
Fuel and purchased power(372.7) (397.1) (6)      (520.6) (39.9) (480.7)      
Transmission(56.4) (58.4) (3)      
Gross margin (b)
$1,446.3
 $1,258.3
 15
 

 

  
Utility gross margin (a)
$1,302.5
 $(107.5) $1,410.0
 

   

(a) 
Consists of recovery of program costs of $31.0 million and $20.5 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, that have a direct offset in operating and maintenance expenses, recovery of throughput disincentive of $9.5 million and $7.0 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively, and a performance incentive of $10.4 million for 2016.
(b)
GrossUtility gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See explanation of utility gross margin under Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's Results of Operations.
(c)
N/M - not meaningful

KCP&L's utility gross margin increased $188.0decreased $107.5 million in 20162018 compared to 2015 primarily2017 driven by:
an estimated $111a $72.4 million refund obligation for the change in the corporate income tax rate caused by the passage of the TCJA. See Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information;
$72.9 million of sales taxes and franchise fees collected from KCP&L Missouri customers included in revenue in 2017, which as part of KCP&L's adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, are now excluded from revenue in 2018; and
a $25.0 million reduction in revenue for one-time and annual bill credits as a result of conditions in the MPSC and KCC merger orders. See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information; partially offset by


a $62.8 million increase primarily due to newhigher retail ratessales driven by warmer spring and an estimated $37 million increase duesummer weather and colder winter weather. For 2018 compared to new cost recovery mechanisms for KCP&L in Missouri effective September 29, 2015, and in Kansas effective October 1, 2015;
an estimated $25 million increase due to warmer weather with a 16% increase in2017, cooling degree days in 2016;
a $10.5 million increase for recovery of program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, which have a direct offset in operatingincreased 33% and maintenance expense;
a $2.5 million increase in MEEIA throughput disincentive;
a $10.4 million MEEIA performance incentive recognized in 2016 related to the achievement of certain energy savings levels in the first cycle of KCP&L's MEEIA programs; and
an estimated $6 million decrease due to a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand.heating degree days increased 23%.
KCP&L Other Operating Expenses ((including operating and maintenance expenses, generalexpense and taxes and other)other than income tax)
KCP&L's other operating expenses increased $47.2decreased $45.9 million in 20162018 compared to 20152017 primarily driven by:
$72.2 million decrease in taxes other than income tax due to sales taxes and franchise fees collected from KCP&L Missouri customers in 2017, which, as part of KCP&L's adoption of ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, are now excluded from taxes other than income tax in 2018; and
a $5.6$23.2 million decrease in operating and maintenance expense due to the net reallocation of incurred merger transition costs between KCP&L, Evergy, Westar Energy and GMO and the subsequent deferral of these transition costs to a regulatory asset in June 2018 for future recovery by KCP&L in accordance with the KCC and MPSC merger orders; partially offset by
an $11.6 million increase due to voluntary severance expenses incurred related to KCP&L's 47% share of the Wolf Creek voluntary exit program as well as other KCP&L voluntary exit programs;
$7.3 million of obsolete inventory write-offs for Montrose Station, which was retired in the fourth quarter of 2018;
a $6.8 million increase in pension expense corresponding to the resetting of pension expense trackers with the effective date of new retail rates;
a $10.5 million increase in program costs for energy efficiency programs under MEEIA, which have a direct offset in revenue;
a $2.3 million increase in planttransmission and distribution operating and maintenance expense; and
a $7.4$6.9 million increase in injuries and damages expense primarily due to an increase in estimated losses from an unfavorable judgment in ongoing litigation; and


a $14.0 million increase in general taxes driven by higher property taxes and higher gross receipts taxes due to an increase in retail revenues.
KCP&L Costs to Achieve the Anticipated Acquisition of Westar
KCP&L's costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar of $10.9 million in 2016 reflects consulting fees, certain severance expenses and other transition costs related to the anticipated acquisition of Westar.worker's compensation losses.
KCP&L Depreciation and Amortization
KCP&L's depreciation and amortization expense increased $11.8$15.0 million in 20162018 compared to 2015 due to2017 primarily driven by capital additions.
KCP&L Interest ChargesOther Income (Expense), Net
KCP&L's interest charges increased $3.8other expense, net decreased $13.7 million in 20162018 compared to 2015 primarily due to a $7.9 million increase in interest expense related to KCP&L's issuance of $350 million of 3.65% Senior Notes in August 2015; partially offset2017 driven by a $2.2$16.8 million decrease in interest expensepension non-service costs due to KCP&L's purchaseadoption of ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits, which requires the non-service cost components to be reported separately from service costs and outside of a subtotal of income from operations. For retrospective application of the 2017 non-service cost components, KCP&L utilized the practical expedient that allows for the use of the amounts disclosed in lieua company's pension and other post-retirement benefit plan footnote as the estimation basis for retrospective presentation. The 2017 amounts disclosed in KCP&L's pension and other post-retirement benefit plan footnote are presented prior to the effects of redemptioncapitalization and sharing with joint owners of its $50.0 millionpower plants. See Note 1 and $21.9 million EIRR Series 2005 bonds in September 2015.Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

KCP&L Income Tax Expense
KCP&L's income tax expense increased $45.1decreased $40.9 million in 20162018 compared to 20152017 primarily driven by:
a $32.2 million decrease in income tax expense as a result of the decrease in the federal statutory income tax rate in 2018;
a $22.5 million decrease due to increasedlower pre-tax income.income;
a $15.5 million decrease related to the revaluation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as a result of the enactment of Missouri state income tax reform in June 2018; and
an $8.3 million decrease in income tax expense due to an increase in flow-through items primarily consisting of amortization of regulatory liabilities for excess deferred income taxes generated as a result of the enactment of the TCJA in December 2017; partially offset by
a $51.0 million increase related to the revaluation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the Evergy composite tax rate as a result of the merger.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 
In the ordinary course of business, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L faceEvergy faces risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include business, legal, operational and credit risks and are not represented in the following analysis. See Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7, MD&A for further discussion of risk factors.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies are exposed to market risks associated with commodity price and supply, interest rates and equity prices. Commodity price risk is the potential adverse price impact related to the purchase or sale of electricity and energy-related products. Credit risk is the potential adverse financial impact resulting from non-performance by a counterparty of its contractual obligations. Interest rate risk is the potential adverse financial impact related to changes in interest rates. In addition, Evergy's investments in trusts to fund nuclear plant decommissioning and to fund non-qualified retirement benefits give rise to security price risk.
Management has established risk management policies and strategies to reduce the potentially adverse effects that the volatility of the markets may have on itsEvergy's operating results. During the ordinary course of business, under the direction and control of an internal commodity risk committee, Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sEvergy Companies' hedging strategies are reviewed to determine the hedging approach deemed appropriate based upon the circumstances of each situation. Though management believes its risk management practices are effective, it is not possible to identify and eliminate all risk. Great Plains Energy and KCP&LEvergy could experience losses, which could have a material adverse effect on theirits results of operations or financial position, due to many factors, including unexpectedly large or rapid movements or disruptions in the energy markets, from regulatory-driven market rule changes and/or bankruptcy or non-performance of customers or counterparties, and/or failure of underlying transactions that have been hedged to materialize.
Hedging Strategies
DerivativeFrom time to time, Evergy utilizes derivative instruments are utilized to execute risk management and hedging strategies. Derivative instruments, such as futures, forward contracts, swaps or options, derive their value from underlying assets, indices, reference rates or a combination of these factors. These derivative instruments include negotiated contracts, which are referred to as over-the-counter derivatives, and instruments listed and traded on an exchange.
Interest RateCommodity Price Risk
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L manage interest expense and short- and long-term liquidity through a combination of fixed and variable rate debt. Generally, the amount of each type of debt is managed through market issuance, but interest rate swap and cap agreements with highly rated financial institutions may also be used to achieve the desired combination. At December 31, 2016, 4% and 6%, respectively, of Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's long-term debt was variable rate debt. Interest rates impact the fair value of long-term debt. A change in interest rates would impact Great Plains Energy and KCP&L to the extent they redeemed any of their outstanding long-term debt. Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's book values of long-term debt were below fair value by 5% at December 31, 2016.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L had $334.8 million and $132.9 million, respectively, of commercial paper outstanding at December 31, 2016. The principal amount of the commercial paper, which will vary during the year, drives Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's commercial paper interest expense. Assuming $334.8 million and $132.9 million of commercial paper was outstanding for all of 2017 for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, respectively, a hypothetical 10% increase in commercial paper rates would result in an increase in interest expense of $0.3 million for Great Plains Energy and $0.1 million for KCP&L in 2017. Assuming $334.8 million and $132.9 million of commercial paper was outstanding for all of 2017 for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, respectively, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in commercial paper rates would result in an increase in interest expense of $3.3 million for Great Plains Energy and $1.3 million for KCP&L in 2017.
At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy had $4.4 billion of notional amounts of fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps to hedge against interest rate fluctuations on future issuances of long-term debt expected to be issued to finance a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar. Settlement of these swaps is contingent on the consummation of the anticipated acquisition of Westar. Assuming settlement of the swaps, a hypothetical 10% decrease in the interest rates underlying the swaps would have resulted in an approximately $51 million increase in interest expense associated with settlement of the swaps as of December 31, 2016.



Commodity Risk
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LEvergy Companies engage in the wholesale and retail marketingsale of electricity and are exposed to riskrisks associated with the price of electricity.electricity and other energy-related products. Exposure to these risks is affected by a number of factors including the quantity and availability of fuel used for generation and the quantity of electricity customers consume. Customers' electricity usage could also vary from year to year based on the weather or other factors. Quantities of fossil fuel used for generation vary from year to year based on the availability, price and deliverability of a given fuel type as well as planned and unplanned outages at facilities that use fossil fuels.
KCP&L's wholesale operations include Evergy's exposure to fluctuations in these factors is limited by the physical delivery and marketing of power obtained through its generation capacity. KCP&L is required to maintain a capacity margin of at least 12%. This net positive supply of capacity and energy is maintained through KCP&L's generation assets and capacity and power purchase agreements to protect KCP&L from the potential operational failure of onecost-based regulation of its power generating units. KCP&L continually evaluates the need for additionalregulated operations in Kansas and Missouri as these operations are typically allowed to recover substantially all of these costs through cost-recovery mechanisms, primarily through fuel recovery mechanisms. While there may be a delay in timing between when these costs are incurred and when they are recovered through rates, changes from year to year generally do not have a material impact on operating results.
Interest Rate Risk
Evergy manages interest rate risk mitigation measures in order to minimizeand short- and long-term liquidity by limiting its financial exposure to among other things, spikesvariable interest rate debt to a percentage of total debt, diversifying maturity dates and, from time to time, entering into interest rate hedging transactions. At December 31, 2018, 4% of Evergy's long-term debt was variable rate debt. Evergy also has short-term borrowings and current maturities of fixed rate debt that are exposed to interest rate risk. Evergy computes and presents information regarding the sensitivity to changes in wholesale power prices during periodsinterest rates for variable rate debt and current maturities of high demand.
KCP&L's sales include the sale of electricity to its retail customers and bulk power sales of electricityfixed rate debt by assuming a 100-basis-point change in the wholesale market. KCP&Lcurrent interest rates applicable to such debt over the remaining time the debt is outstanding.
Evergy had $1,747.0 million of variable rate debt, including notes payable and commercial paper, and current maturities of fixed rate debt as of December 31, 2018. A 100-basis-point change in interest rates applicable to this debt would impact income before income taxes on an annualized basis by approximately $12.5 million.


At December 31, 2018, Evergy had $500.0 million of notional amounts of fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps that had been designated as a membercash flow hedge of SPP Consolidated Balancing Authority (CBA) and Integrated Marketplace (IM), which are largely responsible for the dispatch of member generating facilities and the resulting supply of energy to fulfill member load obligations. KCP&L's Kansas ECA allows for the recovery of increased fuel and purchased power costs from Kansas retail customers. KCP&L’s Missouri FAC allows for KCP&L Missouri retail electric rates to be adjusted based on 95%a forecasted debt issuance in 2019. Assuming settlement of the difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs andswaps, a hypothetical 10% decrease in the amount of fuel and purchased power costs providedinterest rates underlying the swaps would have resulted in base rates. Most ofan approximately $12.8 million increase in interest expense that would have been reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense over the change in market prices for fuel and purchased power is recovered throughperiod that the ECA or FAC, which mitigates KCP&L’s commodity price exposure.
GMO is also a member of SPP’s CBA and IM. GMO has an FAC that allows GMO to adjust retail electric rates based on 95% of the difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the amount of fuel and purchased power costs provided in base rates. Most of the change in market prices for fuel and purchased power is recovered through the FAC, which mitigates GMO's commodity price exposure.

hedged interest payments affected earnings.
Credit Risk - MPS Merchant
MPS MerchantEvergy is exposed to counterparty credit risk. Credit risk largely in the form of accounts receivable from its retail and wholesale electric customers and through executory contracts with market risk exposure. The credit risk associated with accounts receivable from retail and wholesale customers is measuredlargely mitigated by Evergy's large number of individual customers spread across diverse customer classes and the loss that would be recorded if counterparties failedability to perform pursuantrecover bad debt expense in customer rates. The Evergy Companies maintain credit policies and employ credit risk control mechanisms, such as letters of credit, when necessary to the terms of the contractual obligations less the value of any collateral held. MPS Merchant's counterparties are not externally rated. Credit exposure to counterparties at December 31, 2016, was $8.7 million.minimize their overall credit risk and monitor exposure.
Investment Risk
KCP&LEvergy maintains trust funds, as required by the NRC, to fund its 94% share of decommissioning the Wolf Creek nuclear power plant.plant and also maintains trusts to fund pension benefits as well as certain non-qualified retirement benefits. As of December 31, 2016,2018, these funds were primarily invested primarily in domestica diversified mix of equity and debt securities and fixed income securities and are reflected at fair value on KCP&L'sEvergy's balance sheets.sheet. The mix of securities is designed to provide returns to be used to fund decommissioning and to compensate for inflationary increases in decommissioning costs; however, the equity securities in the trusts are exposed to price fluctuations in equity markets and the value of fixed rate fixed incomedebt securities are exposed to changes in interest rates. A hypothetical increaserates and other market factors.
As nuclear decommissioning costs are currently recovered in interestcustomer rates, resulting in a hypothetical 10% decreaseEvergy defers both realized and unrealized gains and losses for the vast majority of these securities as an offset to its regulatory asset for decommissioning Wolf Creek and as such, fluctuations in the value of the fixed incomethese securities woulddo not have resulted in a $6.5 million reductionmaterial impact on Evergy's earnings. A significant decline in the value of the decommissioning trust funds at December 31, 2016. A hypothetical 10% decreasepension or non-qualified retirement assets could require Evergy to increase funding of its pension plans in equity prices would have resultedfuture periods, which could adversely affect cash flows in those periods. In addition, a $15.2 million reductiondecline in the fair value of these plan assets, in the equity securities at December 31, 2016. KCP&L's exposure to investment risk associated with the decommissioning trust funds is in large part mitigated dueabsence of additional cash contributions to the fact that KCP&L is currently allowed to recover its decommissioning costs in its rates. Ifplans by Evergy, could increase the actual return on trust assets is below the anticipated level, KCP&L could be responsible for the balanceamount of fundspension cost required to decommission Wolf Creek; however, while there can be no assurances, management believes a rate increase would be allowed to recover decommissioning costs over the remaining life of the unit.recorded in future periods by Evergy.



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
   
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. 
   
Kansas City Power & Light CompanyWestar Energy, Inc. 
Kansas City Power & Light Company
   
 
Note 1:
Note 2:
Note 3:
Note 4:
Note 5:
Note 6:
Note 7:
Note 8:
Note 7:
Note 8:
Note 9:
Note 10:
Note 11:
Note 12:
Note 13:
Note 14:
Note 15:
Note 16:
Note 17:15:
Note 18:16:
Note 17:
Note 18:
Note 19:
Note 20:
Note 21:
Note 22:
Note 23:
Note 24:
Note 25:



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Evergy, Inc.
Great Plains Energy IncorporatedOpinion on the Financial Statements
Kansas City, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, and2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, shareholders'changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included2018, and the related notes and the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are15 (collectively referred to as the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)"financial statements"). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidatedthe financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Great Plains Energy Incorporated and subsidiariesthe Company as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016,2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 23, 2017



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Kansas City Power & Light Company
Kansas City, Missouri
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Power & Light Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, common shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kansas City Power & Light Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2017,21, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 23, 201721, 2019 

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.







REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Westar Energy, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Westar Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri  
February 21, 2019  

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.















REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Kansas City Power & Light Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Power & Light Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri  
February 21, 2019  

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.





GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
     
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues(millions, except per share amounts)
Electric revenues $2,676.0
 $2,502.2
 $2,568.2
Operating Expenses  
  
  
Fuel and purchased power 590.1
 608.7
 742.5
Transmission 84.8
 89.1
 74.7
Utility operating and maintenance expenses 759.5
 724.8
 701.9
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar Energy, Inc. 34.2
 
 
Depreciation and amortization 344.8
 330.4
 306.0
General taxes 226.7
 213.2
 204.6
Other 17.0
 5.9
 4.0
Total 2,057.1
 1,972.1
 2,033.7
Operating income 618.9
 530.1
 534.5
Non-operating income 17.1
 11.7
 25.0
Non-operating expenses (14.3) (8.0) (12.5)
Interest charges (161.5) (199.3) (188.5)
Income before income tax expense and income from equity investments 460.2
 334.5
 358.5
Income tax expense (172.2) (122.7) (115.7)
Income from equity investments, net of income taxes 2.0
 1.2
 
Net income 290.0
 213.0
 242.8
Preferred stock dividend requirements and redemption premium 16.5
 1.6
 1.6
Earnings available for common shareholders $273.5
 $211.4
 $241.2
       
Average number of basic common shares outstanding 169.4
 154.2
 153.9
Average number of diluted common shares outstanding 169.8
 154.8
 154.1
       
Basic and diluted earnings per common share
 $1.61
 $1.37
 $1.57
Comprehensive Income      
Net income $290.0
 $213.0
 $242.8
Other comprehensive income  
  
  
Derivative hedging activity  
  
  
Reclassification to expenses, net of tax 5.6
 5.7
 8.0
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 5.6
 5.7
 8.0
Defined benefit pension plans      
Net gain (loss) arising during period (1.1) 1.0
 (3.0)
Income tax (expense) benefit 0.4
 (0.4) 1.2
Net gain (loss) arising during period, net of tax (0.7) 0.6
 (1.8)
Amortization of net losses included in net periodic benefit costs, net of tax 0.5
 0.4
 0.4
Change in unrecognized pension expense, net of tax (0.2) 1.0
 (1.4)
Total other comprehensive income 5.4
 6.7
 6.6
Comprehensive income $295.4
 $219.7
 $249.4
EVERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
     
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
 (millions, except per share amounts)
OPERATING REVENUES $4,275.9
 $2,571.0
 $2,562.1
OPERATING EXPENSES:      
Fuel and purchased power 1,078.7
 541.5
 509.5
SPP network transmission costs 259.9
 247.9
 232.8
Operating and maintenance 1,115.8
 563.5
 587.2
Depreciation and amortization 618.8
 371.7
 338.5
Taxes other than income tax 269.1
 167.6
 191.7
Total Operating Expenses 3,342.3
 1,892.2
 1,859.7
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 933.6
 678.8
 702.4
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):      
Investment earnings 8.8
 4.0
 2.5
Other income 15.5
 8.3
 34.6
Other expense (78.7) (39.1) (38.6)
Total Other Income (Expense), Net (54.4) (26.8) (1.5)
Interest expense 279.6
 171.0
 161.7
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 599.6
 481.0
 539.2
Income tax expense 59.0
 151.2
 184.5
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes 5.4
 6.7
 6.5
NET INCOME 546.0
 336.5
 361.2
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 10.2
 12.6
 14.6
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EVERGY, INC. $535.8
 $323.9
 $346.6
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING ATTRIBUTABLE TO EVERGY (see Note 1)      
Basic earnings per common share $2.50
 $2.27
 $2.43
Diluted earnings per common share $2.50
 $2.27
 $2.43
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING      
Basic 213.9
 142.5
 142.1
Diluted 214.1
 142.6
 142.5
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME      
NET INCOME $546.0
 $336.5
 $361.2
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME      
Derivative hedging activity      
Loss on derivative hedging instruments (5.4) 
 
Income tax benefit 1.4
 
 
Net loss on derivative hedging instruments (4.0) 
 
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax (4.0) 
 
Defined benefit pension plans      
Net gain arising during period 1.4
 
 
Income tax expense (0.4) 
 
Net gain arising during period, net of tax 1.0
 
 
Change in unrecognized pension expense, net of tax 1.0
 
 
Total other comprehensive loss (3.0) 
 
Comprehensive income 543.0
 336.5
 361.2
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest 10.2
 12.6
 14.6
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO EVERGY, INC. $532.8
 $323.9
 $346.6
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    
 December 31
 2016 2015
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
Current Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents $1,293.1
   $11.3
 
Time deposit 1,000.0
   
 
Receivables, net 166.0
   147.7
 
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral 172.4
   175.0
 
Fuel inventories, at average cost 108.8
   118.4
 
Materials and supplies, at average cost 162.2
   155.7
 
Deferred refueling outage costs 22.3
   19.2
 
Refundable income taxes 
   3.8
 
Derivative instruments 81.5
   0.8
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 53.2
   32.3
 
Total 3,059.5
   664.2
 
Utility Plant, at Original Cost  
    
 
Electric 13,597.7
   13,189.9
 
Less - accumulated depreciation 5,106.9
   4,943.7
 
Net utility plant in service 8,490.8
   8,246.2
 
Construction work in progress 403.9
   347.9
 
Nuclear fuel, net of amortization of $172.1 and $192.5 62.0
   68.3
 
Total 8,956.7
   8,662.4
 
Investments and Other Assets  
    
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund 222.9
   200.7
 
Regulatory assets 1,048.0
   979.1
 
Goodwill 169.0
   169.0
 
Other 113.9
   63.2
 
Total 1,553.8
   1,412.0
 
Total $13,570.0
   $10,738.6
 
EVERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    
 December 31
 2018 2017
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
CURRENT ASSETS:       
Cash and cash equivalents $160.3
   $3.4
 
Receivables, net 193.7
   290.7
 
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral 365.0
   
 
Fuel inventory and supplies 511.0
   293.6
 
Income taxes receivable 68.0
   
 
Regulatory assets 303.9
   99.5
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 79.1
   39.8
 
Total Current Assets 1,681.0
   727.0
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET 18,782.5
   9,553.8
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES, NET 169.2
   176.3
 
OTHER ASSETS:  
    
 
Regulatory assets 1,757.9
   685.4
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund 472.1
   237.1
 
Goodwill 2,338.9
   
 
Other 396.5
   244.8
 
Total Other Assets 4,965.4
   1,167.3
 
TOTAL ASSETS $25,598.1
   $11,624.4
 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.











GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 December 31
 2016 2015
LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION(millions, except share amounts)
Current Liabilities       
Notes payable $
   $10.0
 
Collateralized note payable 172.4
   175.0
 
Commercial paper 334.8
   224.0
 
Current maturities of long-term debt 382.1
   1.1
 
Accounts payable 323.7
   352.9
 
Accrued taxes 33.3
   31.6
 
Accrued interest 50.8
   44.7
 
Accrued compensation and benefits 52.1
   41.4
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 3.0
   3.4
 
Other 32.6
   31.6
 
Total 1,384.8
   915.7
 
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities  
    
 
Deferred income taxes 1,329.7
   1,158.8
 
Deferred tax credits 126.2
   125.1
 
Asset retirement obligations 316.0
   275.9
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 488.3
   455.2
 
Regulatory liabilities 309.9
   284.4
 
Other 87.9
   82.9
 
Total 2,658.0
   2,382.3
 
Capitalization  
    
 
Great Plains Energy shareholders' equity  
    
 
Common stock - 600,000,000 and 250,000,000 shares authorized without par value
215,479,105 and 154,504,900 shares issued, stated value
 4,217.0
   2,646.7
 
Cumulative preferred stock - 390,000 shares authorized, $100 par value
     0 and 390,000 shares issued and outstanding
 
   39.0
 
Preference stock - 11,000,000 shares authorized without par value
     7.00% Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
       $1,000 per share liquidation preference, 862,500 and 0 shares issued and outstanding
 836.2
   
 
Retained earnings 1,119.2
   1,024.4
 
Treasury stock - 128,087 and 101,229 shares, at cost (3.8)   (2.6) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (6.6)   (12.0) 
Total shareholders' equity 6,162.0
   3,695.5
 
Long-term debt (Note 12) 3,365.2
   3,745.1
 
Total 9,527.2
   7,440.6
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15) 

   

 
Total $13,570.0
   $10,738.6
 
EVERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 December 31
 2018 2017
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY(millions, except share amounts)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:       
Current maturities of long-term debt $705.4
   $
 
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities 30.3
   28.5
 
Notes payable and commercial paper 738.6
   275.7
 
Collateralized note payable 365.0
   
 
Accounts payable 451.5
   204.2
 
Accrued dividends 
   53.8
 
Accrued taxes 133.6
   87.7
 
Accrued interest 110.9
   72.7
 
Regulatory liabilities 110.2
   11.6
 
Asset retirement obligations 49.8
   25.1
 
Other 171.9
   64.4
 
Total Current Liabilities 2,867.2
   823.7
 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:  
    
 
Long-term debt, net 6,636.3
   3,687.6
 
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net 51.1
   81.4
 
Deferred income taxes 1,599.2
   815.7
 
Unamortized investment tax credits 373.2
   257.1
 
Regulatory liabilities 2,218.8
   1,094.0
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 987.6
   491.2
 
Asset retirement obligations 637.3
   380.0
 
Other 236.7
   133.3
 
Total Long-Term Liabilities 12,740.2
   6,940.3
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 

   

 
EQUITY:       
Evergy, Inc. Shareholders' Equity:       
Common stock - 600,000,000 shares authorized, without par value, 255,326,252 shares issued (275,000,000 shares authorized, $5 par value, 142,094,275 shares issued as of December 31, 2017) 8,685.2
   2,734.8
 
Retained earnings 1,346.0
   1,173.3
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (3.0)   
 
Total Evergy, Inc. Shareholders' Equity 10,028.2
   3,908.1
 
Noncontrolling Interests (37.5)   (47.7) 
Total Equity 9,990.7
   3,860.4
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $25,598.1
   $11,624.4
 
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
         
Year Ended December 312016  2015  2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities(millions)
Net income$290.0
  $213.0
  $242.8
 
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities: 
   
    
Depreciation and amortization344.8
  330.4
  306.0
 
Amortization of: 
   
    
Nuclear fuel26.6
  26.8
  26.1
 
Other77.5
  47.7
  46.1
 
Deferred income taxes, net170.1
  124.9
  125.8
 
Investment tax credit amortization(1.4)  (1.4)  (1.4) 
Income from equity investments, net of income taxes(2.0)  (1.2)  
 
Fair value impacts of interest rate swaps(79.3)  
  
 
Other operating activities (Note 3)(42.3)  12.9
  (47.2) 
Net cash from operating activities784.0
  753.1
  698.2
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities 
   
    
Utility capital expenditures(609.4)  (677.1)  (773.7) 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction(6.8)  (5.8)  (13.0) 
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments(31.9)  (50.9)  (27.5) 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust investments28.6
  47.6
  24.2
 
Purchase of time deposit(1,000.0)  
  
 
Proceeds from sale of transmission assets
  
  37.7
 
Other investing activities(64.0)  (48.2)  (27.5) 
Net cash from investing activities(1,683.5)  (734.4)  (779.8) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities 
   
    
Issuance of common stock1,603.7
  3.0
  4.8
 
Issuance of preference stock862.5
  
  
 
Issuance of long-term debt
  348.8
  
 
Issuance of long-term debt from remarketing
  146.5
  
 
Repayment of long-term debt from remarketing
  (146.5)  
 
Issuance fees(143.6)  (3.0)  (0.9) 
Repayment of long-term debt(1.1)  (87.0)  (13.4) 
Net change in short-term borrowings100.8
  (128.3)  245.1
 
Net change in collateralized short-term borrowings(2.6)  4.0
  (4.0) 
Dividends paid(194.0)  (155.5)  (145.6) 
Redemption of cumulative preferred stock(40.1)  
  
 
Purchase of treasury stock(5.0)  (1.6)  (2.5) 
Other financing activities0.7
  (0.8)  0.5
 
Net cash from financing activities2,181.3
  (20.4)  84.0
 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents1,281.8
  (1.7)  2.4
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year11.3
  13.0
  10.6
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year$1,293.1
  $11.3
  $13.0
 
EVERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
      
Year Ended December 312018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(millions)
Net income$546.0
 $336.5
 $361.2
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization618.8
 371.7
 338.5
Amortization of nuclear fuel43.6
 32.2
 26.7
Amortization of deferred refueling outage21.2
 16.1
 18.4
Amortization of deferred regulatory gain from sale leaseback(5.5) (5.5) (5.5)
Amortization of corporate-owned life insurance22.6
 20.6
 18.0
Non-cash compensation29.9
 8.8
 9.3
Net deferred income taxes and credits124.2
 149.6
 185.2
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(3.1) (2.0) (11.6)
Payments for asset retirement obligations(22.4) (16.0) (5.4)
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes(5.4) (6.7) (6.5)
Other(2.0) (6.0) (22.0)
Changes in working capital items:     
Accounts receivable265.1
 (2.1) (30.3)
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral(185.0) 
 
Fuel inventory and supplies54.7
 7.2
 1.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(128.1) 55.8
 (18.3)
Accounts payable56.7
 10.0
 (8.1)
Accrued taxes(76.4) 9.2
 (5.9)
Other current liabilities92.0
 (118.0) (86.4)
Changes in other assets66.8
 32.0
 21.4
Changes in other liabilities(15.9) 19.3
 23.3
Cash Flows from Operating Activities1,497.8
 912.7
 803.8
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Additions to property, plant and equipment(1,069.7) (764.6) (1,087.0)
Cash acquired from the merger with Great Plains Energy1,154.2
 
 
Purchase of securities - trusts(117.5) (41.0) (46.6)
Sale of securities - trusts117.7
 41.2
 47.0
Investment in corporate-owned life insurance(17.1) (17.0) (18.1)
Proceeds from investment in corporate-owned life insurance6.8
 4.2
 114.7
Proceeds from settlement of interest rate swap140.6
 
 
Other investing activities(17.6) (3.6) (4.1)
Cash Flows from (used in) Investing Activities197.4
 (780.8) (994.1)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Short term debt, net(104.0) (91.3) 116.2
Collateralized short-term borrowings, net185.0
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt290.9
 296.2
 396.3
Proceeds from long-term debt of variable interest entity
 
 162.0
Retirements of long-term debt(395.8) (125.0) (50.0)
Retirements of long-term debt of variable interest entities(28.5) (26.8) (190.4)
Borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance56.5
 55.1
 57.8
Repayment of borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance(3.9) (1.0) (89.3)
Cash dividends paid(475.0) (223.1) (204.3)
Repurchase of common stock(1,042.3) 
 
Other financing activities(21.3) (15.7) (8.1)
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities(1,538.4) (131.6) 190.2
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH156.8
 0.3
 (0.1)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH:     
Beginning of period, including restricted cash of $0.1, $0.1 and $0.1, respectively3.5
 3.2
 3.3
End of period, including restricted cash of $0.0, $0.1 and $0.1, respectively$160.3
 $3.5
 $3.2
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity
        
Year Ended December 312016 2015 2014
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
Common Stock(millions, except share amounts)
Beginning balance154,504,900
 $2,646.7
 154,254,037
 $2,639.3
 153,995,621
 $2,631.1
Issuance of common stock60,974,205
 1,565.3
 250,863
 6.6
 258,416
 6.7
Equity compensation expense, net of forfeitures 4.3
  
 1.9
   0.5
Unearned Compensation 
  
  
  
    
Issuance of restricted common stock 
 (2.8)  
 (2.4)   (2.1)
Forfeiture of restricted common stock  
   0.5
   
Compensation expense recognized 
 2.7
  
 1.8
   2.0
Other 
 0.8
  
 (1.0)   1.1
Ending balance215,479,105
 4,217.0
 154,504,900
 2,646.7
 154,254,037
 2,639.3
Cumulative Preferred Stock           
Beginning balance390,000
 39.0
 390,000
 39.0
 390,000
 39.0
Redemption of cumulative preferred stock(390,000) (39.0) 
 
 
 
Ending balance
 
 390,000
 39.0
 390,000
 39.0
Preference Stock           
Beginning balance
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock862,500
 836.2
 
 
 
 
Ending balance862,500
 836.2
 
 
 
 
Retained Earnings 
  
  
  
    
Beginning balance 
 1,024.4
  
 967.8
   871.4
Net income 
 290.0
  
 213.0
   242.8
Redemption premium on cumulative preferred stock (0.6)   
   
Dividends: 
  
  
  
    
Common stock ($1.0625, $0.9975 and $0.935 per share) (181.0)  
 (153.9)   (144.0)
Preferred stock - at required rates 
 (13.0)  
 (1.6)   (1.6)
Performance shares 
 (0.6)  
 (0.9)   (0.8)
Ending balance 
 1,119.2
  
 1,024.4
   967.8
Treasury Stock 
  
  
  
    
Beginning balance(101,229) (2.6) (91,281) (2.3) (129,290) (2.8)
Treasury shares acquired(138,021) (4.1) (76,468) (2.0) (85,744) (2.2)
Treasury shares reissued111,163
 2.9
 66,520
 1.7
 123,753
 2.7
Ending balance(128,087) (3.8) (101,229) (2.6) (91,281) (2.3)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  
  
  
    
Beginning balance 
 (12.0)  
 (18.7)   (25.3)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 
 5.6
  
 5.7
   8.0
Change in unrecognized pension expense, net of tax (0.2)  
 1.0
   (1.4)
Ending balance 
 (6.6)  
 (12.0)   (18.7)
Total Great Plains Energy Shareholders' Equity $6,162.0
  
 $3,695.5
   $3,625.1
EVERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
       
 Evergy, Inc. Shareholders  
 Common stock sharesCommon stockRetained earningsAOCINon-controlling interestsTotal equity
 (millions, except share amounts)
Balance as of December 31, 2015141,353,426
$2,710.9
$945.8
$
$15.2
$3,671.9
Net income

346.6

14.6
361.2
Issuance of stock48,101
2.4



2.4
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends389,626
9.7



9.7
Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(5.0)


(5.0)
Dividends declared on common stock ($1.52 per share)

(217.1)

(217.1)
Stock compensation expense
9.3



9.3
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests



(2.5)(2.5)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-09

3.3


3.3
Balance as of December 31, 2016141,791,153
2,727.3
1,078.6

27.3
3,833.2
Net income

323.9

12.6
336.5
Issuance of stock12,131
0.6



0.6
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends290,991
5.1



5.1
Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(7.0)


(7.0)
Dividends declared on common stock ($1.60 per share)

(229.2)

(229.2)
Stock compensation expense
8.8



8.8
Deconsolidation of noncontrolling interests



(81.9)(81.9)
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests



(5.7)(5.7)
Balance as of December 31, 2017142,094,275
2,734.8
1,173.3

(47.7)3,860.4
Net income

535.8

10.2
546.0
Issuance of stock to Great Plains Energy shareholders128,947,518
6,979.9



6,979.9
Issuance of restricted common stock122,505





Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends533,273
0.5



0.5
Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(17.2)


(17.2)
Dividends declared on common stock ($1.735 per share)

(362.1)

(362.1)
Dividend equivalents declared

(1.0)

(1.0)
Stock compensation expense
29.9



29.9
Repurchase of common stock(16,371,319)(1,042.3)


(1,042.3)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax


(4.0)
(4.0)
Change in unrecognized pension expense, net of tax


1.0

1.0
Other
(0.4)


(0.4)
Balance as of December 31, 2018255,326,252
$8,685.2
$1,346.0
$(3.0)$(37.5)$9,990.7
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
     
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 2014
Operating Revenues (millions)
Electric revenues $1,875.4
 $1,713.8
 $1,730.8
Operating Expenses  
  
  
Fuel and purchased power 372.7
 397.1
 472.7
Transmission 56.4
 58.4
 47.2
Operating and maintenance expenses 525.8
 494.2
 489.1
Costs to achieve the anticipated acquisition of Westar Energy, Inc. 10.9
 
 
Depreciation and amortization 247.5
 235.7
 213.9
General taxes 177.5
 163.5
 159.1
Other 2.5
 0.9
 (1.3)
Total 1,393.3
 1,349.8
 1,380.7
Operating income 482.1
 364.0
 350.1
Non-operating income 11.8
 8.4
 20.4
Non-operating expenses (7.6) (7.2) (8.3)
Interest charges (139.4) (135.6) (124.1)
Income before income tax expense 346.9
 229.6
 238.1
Income tax expense (121.9) (76.8) (75.7)
Net income $225.0
 $152.8
 $162.4
Comprehensive Income  
  
  
Net income $225.0
 $152.8
 $162.4
Other comprehensive income  
  
  
Derivative hedging activity  
  
  
Reclassification to expenses, net of tax 5.4
 5.3
 5.3
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 5.4
 5.3
 5.3
Total other comprehensive income 5.4
 5.3
 5.3
Comprehensive income $230.4
 $158.1
 $167.7
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
       
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
  (millions)
OPERATING REVENUES $2,614.9
 $2,571.0
 $2,562.1
OPERATING EXPENSES:      
Fuel and purchased power 599.2
 541.5
 509.5
SPP network transmission costs 259.9
 247.9
 232.8
Operating and maintenance 640.7
 563.5
 587.2
Depreciation and amortization 390.9
 371.7
 338.5
Taxes other than income tax 173.7
 167.6
 191.7
Total Operating Expenses 2,064.4
 1,892.2
 1,859.7
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 550.5
 678.8
 702.4
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):      
Investment earnings (loss) (0.6) 4.0
 2.5
Other income 13.9
 8.3
 34.6
Other expense (46.8) (39.1) (38.6)
Total Other Income (Expense), Net (33.5) (26.8) (1.5)
Interest expense 176.8
 171.0
 161.7
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 340.2
 481.0
 539.2
Income tax expense (benefit) (4.3) 151.2
 184.5
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes 4.6
 6.7
 6.5
NET INCOME 349.1
 336.5
 361.2
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 10.2
 12.6
 14.6
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. $338.9
 $323.9
 $346.6
The disclosures regarding Westar Energy, Inc. included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    
 December 31
 2018 2017
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
CURRENT ASSETS:       
Cash and cash equivalents $44.5
   $3.4
 
Receivables, net 84.3
   290.7
 
Related party receivables 2.6
   
 
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral 185.0
   
 
Fuel inventory and supplies 276.8
   293.6
 
Income taxes receivable 42.7
   
 
Regulatory assets 97.1
   99.5
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 35.0
   39.8
 
Total Current Assets 768.0
   727.0
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET 9,718.3
   9,553.8
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES, NET 169.2
   176.3
 
OTHER ASSETS:  
    
 
Regulatory assets 700.4
   685.4
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund 227.5
   237.1
 
Other 233.4
   244.8
 
Total Other Assets 1,161.3
   1,167.3
 
TOTAL ASSETS $11,816.8
   $11,624.4
 
The disclosures regarding Westar Energy included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 December 31
 2018 2017
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY(millions, except share amounts)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:       
Current maturities of long-term debt $300.0
   $
 
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities 30.3
   28.5
 
Notes payable and commercial paper 411.7
   275.7
 
Collateralized note payable 185.0
   
 
Accounts payable 154.4
   204.2
 
Related party payables 14.9
   
 
Accrued dividends 
   53.8
 
Accrued taxes 88.6
   87.7
 
Accrued interest 74.4
   72.7
 
Regulatory liabilities 19.5
   11.6
 
Asset retirement obligations 17.1
   25.1
 
Other 83.0
   64.4
 
Total Current Liabilities 1,378.9
   823.7
 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:  
    
 
Long-term debt, net 3,389.8
   3,687.6
 
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net 51.1
   81.4
 
Deferred income taxes 815.4
   815.7
 
Unamortized investment tax credits 249.7
   257.1
 
Regulatory liabilities 1,101.8
   1,094.0
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 474.7
   491.2
 
Asset retirement obligations 264.0
   380.0
 
Other 130.7
   133.3
 
Total Long-Term Liabilities 6,477.2
   6,940.3
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 

   

 
EQUITY:  
     
Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholder's Equity:  
    
 
Common stock - 1,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 1 share issued (275,000,000 shares authorized, $5 par value, and 142,094,275 shares issued as of December 31, 2017) 2,737.6
   2,734.8
 
Retained earnings 1,260.6
   1,173.3
 
Total Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholder's Equity 3,998.2
   3,908.1
 
Noncontrolling Interests (37.5)   (47.7) 
Total Equity 3,960.7
   3,860.4
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $11,816.8
   $11,624.4
 
The disclosures regarding Westar Energy included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
Year Ended December 312018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(millions)
Net income$349.1
 $336.5
 $361.2
Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization390.9
 371.7
 338.5
Amortization of nuclear fuel26.0
 32.2
 26.7
Amortization of deferred refueling outage13.7
 16.1
 18.4
Amortization of deferred regulatory gain from sale leaseback(5.5) (5.5) (5.5)
Amortization of corporate-owned life insurance22.6
 20.6
 18.0
Non-cash compensation19.9
 8.8
 9.3
Net deferred income taxes and credits(2.2) 149.6
 185.2
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(2.9) (2.0) (11.6)
Payments for asset retirement obligations(12.0) (16.0) (5.4)
Equity in earnings of equity method investees, net of income taxes(4.6) (6.7) (6.5)
Other(2.2) (6.0) (22.0)
Changes in working capital items:     
Accounts receivable207.9
 (2.1) (30.3)
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral(185.0) 
 
Fuel inventory and supplies17.3
 7.2
 1.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(134.2) 55.8
 (18.3)
Accounts payable(17.6) 10.0
 (8.1)
Accrued taxes(24.1) 9.2
 (5.9)
Other current liabilities88.3
 (118.0) (86.4)
Changes in other assets42.7
 32.0
 21.4
Changes in other liabilities(36.2) 19.3
 23.3
Cash Flows from Operating Activities751.9
 912.7
 803.8
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Additions to property, plant and equipment(713.3) (764.6) (1,087.0)
Purchase of securities - trusts(99.4) (41.0) (46.6)
Sale of securities - trusts104.2
 41.2
 47.0
Investment in corporate-owned life insurance(17.1) (17.0) (18.1)
Proceeds from investment in corporate-owned life insurance6.8
 4.2
 114.7
Other investing activities(8.6) (3.6) (4.1)
Cash Flows (used in) Investing Activities(727.4) (780.8) (994.1)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Short term debt, net133.7
 (91.3) 116.2
Collateralized short-term debt, net185.0
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt121.9
 296.2
 396.3
Proceeds from long-term debt of variable interest entity
 
 162.0
Retirements of long-term debt(121.9) (125.0) (50.0)
Retirements of long-term debt of variable interest entities(28.5) (26.8) (190.4)
Borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance56.5
 55.1
 57.8
Repayment of borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance(3.9) (1.0) (89.3)
Cash dividends paid(305.1) (223.1) (204.3)
Other financing activities(21.2) (15.7) (8.1)
Cash Flows from (used in) Financing Activities16.5
 (131.6) 190.2
NET CHANGE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH41.0
 0.3
 (0.1)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH:     
Beginning of period, including restricted cash of $0.1, $0.1 and $0.1, respectively3.5
 3.2
 3.3
End of period, including restricted cash of $0.0, $0.1 and $0.1, respectively$44.5
 $3.5
 $3.2
The disclosures regarding Westar Energy included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
      
 Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholders  
 Common stock sharesCommon stockRetained earningsNon-controlling interestsTotal equity
 (millions, except share amounts)
Balance as of December 31, 2015141,353,426
$2,710.9
$945.8
$15.2
$3,671.9
Net income

346.6
14.6
361.2
Issuance of stock48,101
2.4


2.4
Issuance of stock compensation and reinvested dividends389,626
9.7


9.7
Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(5.0)

(5.0)
Dividends declared on common stock

(217.1)
(217.1)
Stock compensation expense
9.3


9.3
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests


(2.5)(2.5)
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-09

3.3

3.3
Balance as of December 31, 2016141,791,153
2,727.3
1,078.6
27.3
3,833.2
Net income

323.9
12.6
336.5
Issuance of stock12,131
0.6


0.6
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends290,991
5.1


5.1
Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(7.0)

(7.0)
Dividends declared on common stock

(229.2)
(229.2)
Stock compensation expense
8.8


8.8
Deconsolidation of noncontrolling interests


(81.9)(81.9)
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests


(5.7)(5.7)
Balance as of December 31, 2017142,094,275
2,734.8
1,173.3
(47.7)3,860.4
Net income

338.9
10.2
349.1
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends516,990




Stock cancelled pursuant to Amended Merger Agreement(142,611,264)



Tax withholding related to stock compensation
(17.2)

(17.2)
Dividends declared on common stock

(251.6)
(251.6)
Stock compensation expense
19.9


19.9
Other
0.1


0.1
Balance as of December 31, 20181
$2,737.6
$1,260.6
$(37.5)$3,960.7
The disclosures regarding Westar Energy included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
     
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
  (millions)
OPERATING REVENUES $1,823.1
 $1,890.7
 $1,875.4
OPERATING EXPENSES:  
  
  
Fuel and purchased power 520.6
 480.7
 429.1
Operating and maintenance 494.2
 474.8
 502.0
Depreciation and amortization 281.3
 266.3
 247.5
Taxes other than income tax 117.2
 182.5
 177.5
Total Operating Expenses 1,413.3
 1,404.3
 1,356.1
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 409.8
 486.4
 519.3
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):      
Investment earnings 2.8
 2.0
 0.6
Other income 2.2
 9.2
 11.2
Other expense (30.9) (50.8) (44.8)
Total Other Income (Expense), Net (25.9) (39.6) (33.0)
Interest expense 133.7
 138.8
 139.4
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 250.2
 308.0
 346.9
Income tax expense 87.3
 128.2
 121.9
NET INCOME $162.9
 $179.8
 $225.0
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  
  
  
NET INCOME $162.9
 $179.8
 $225.0
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  
  
  
Derivative hedging activity  
  
  
Reclassification to expenses, net of tax: 3.7
 4.6
 5.4
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 3.7
 4.6
 5.4
Total Other Comprehensive Income 3.7
 4.6
 5.4
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $166.6
 $184.4
 $230.4
The disclosures regarding KCP&L included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 December 31
 2016 2015
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
Current Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents $4.5
   $2.3
 
Receivables, net 139.1
   129.2
 
Related party receivables 67.2
   65.8
 
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral 110.0
   110.0
 
Fuel inventories, at average cost 72.9
   83.5
 
Materials and supplies, at average cost 118.9
   114.6
 
Deferred refueling outage costs 22.3
   19.2
 
Refundable income taxes 12.7
   79.0
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 27.9
   27.6
 
Total 575.5
   631.2
 
Utility Plant, at Original Cost  
    
 
Electric 9,925.1
   9,640.4
 
Less - accumulated depreciation 3,858.4
   3,722.6
 
Net utility plant in service 6,066.7
   5,917.8
 
Construction work in progress 300.4
   246.6
 
Nuclear fuel, net of amortization of $172.1 and $192.5 62.0
   68.3
 
Total 6,429.1
   6,232.7
 
Investments and Other Assets  
    
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund 222.9
   200.7
 
Regulatory assets 801.8
   732.4
 
Other 29.1
   17.6
 
Total 1,053.8
   950.7
 
Total $8,058.4
   $7,814.6
 
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    
 December 31
 2018 2017
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
CURRENT ASSETS:       
Cash and cash equivalents $2.6
   $2.2
 
Receivables, net 62.7
   106.3
 
Related party receivables 101.8
   84.7
 
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral 130.0
   130.0
 
Fuel inventory and supplies 177.6
   197.0
 
Income taxes receivable 
   5.4
 
Regulatory assets 130.9
   153.6
 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 36.9
   27.6
 
Total Current Assets 642.5
   706.8
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET 6,688.1
   6,565.6
 
OTHER ASSETS:  
    
 
Regulatory assets 495.2
   545.1
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund 244.6
   258.4
 
Other 50.1
   48.0
 
Total Other Assets 789.9
   851.5
 
TOTAL ASSETS $8,120.5
   $8,123.9
 
The disclosures regarding KCP&L included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.



KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    
 December 31
 2016 2015
LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION(millions, except share amounts)
Current Liabilities       
Collateralized note payable $110.0
   $110.0
 
Commercial paper 132.9
   180.3
 
Current maturities of long-term debt 281.0
   
 
Accounts payable 231.6
   258.8
 
Accrued taxes 27.0
   25.6
 
Accrued interest 32.4
   32.4
 
Accrued compensation and benefits 52.1
   41.4
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 1.6
   2.0
 
Other 11.4
   12.6
 
Total 880.0
   663.1
 
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities  
    
 
Deferred income taxes 1,228.3
   1,132.6
 
Deferred tax credits 122.8
   123.8
 
Asset retirement obligations 278.0
   239.3
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 465.8
   433.4
 
Regulatory liabilities 187.4
   164.6
 
Other 70.6
   61.6
 
Total 2,352.9
   2,155.3
 
Capitalization  
    
 
Common shareholder's equity  
    
 
Common stock - 1,000 shares authorized without par value  
    
 
1 share issued, stated value 1,563.1
   1,563.1
 
Retained earnings 982.6
   879.6
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (4.2)   (9.6) 
Total 2,541.5
   2,433.1
 
Long-term debt (Note 12) 2,284.0
   2,563.1
 
Total 4,825.5
   4,996.2
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 15) 

   

 
Total $8,058.4
   $7,814.6
 
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 December 31
 2018 2017
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:       
Current maturities of long-term debt $400.0
   $350.0
 
Notes payable and commercial paper 176.9
   167.5
 
Collateralized note payable 130.0
   130.0
 
Accounts payable 211.1
   249.0
 
Accrued taxes 39.7
   29.0
 
Accrued interest 28.9
   32.4
 
Regulatory liabilities 52.8
   8.3
 
Asset retirement obligations 29.2
   34.9
 
Other 69.7
   63.4
 
Total Current Liabilities 1,138.3
   1,064.5
 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:  
    
 
Long-term debt, net 2,130.1
   2,232.2
 
Deferred income taxes 631.8
   616.1
 
Unamortized investment tax credits 120.7
   121.8
 
Regulatory liabilities 794.3
   770.9
 
Pension and post-retirement liability 491.9
   512.2
 
Asset retirement obligations 231.8
   231.4
 
Other 81.8
   61.6
 
Total Long-Term Liabilities 4,482.4
   4,546.2
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 

   

 
EQUITY:  
    
 
Common stock - 1,000 shares authorized, without par value, 1 share issued, stated value 1,563.1
   1,563.1
 
Retained earnings 932.6
   949.7
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income 4.1
   0.4
 
Total Equity 2,499.8
   2,513.2
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $8,120.5
   $8,123.9
 
The disclosures regarding KCP&L included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
           
Year Ended December 31 2016   2015  2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities(millions) 
Net income $225.0
   $152.8
  $162.4
 
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities:      
    
Depreciation and amortization 247.5
   235.7
  213.9
 
Amortization of:  
    
    
Nuclear fuel 26.6
   26.8
  26.1
 
Other 33.9
   29.1
  29.3
 
Deferred income taxes, net 93.4
   99.4
  88.4
 
Investment tax credit amortization (1.0)   (1.0)  (1.0) 
Other operating activities (Note 3) (2.1)   (61.5)  (64.7) 
Net cash from operating activities 623.3
   481.3
  454.4
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities  
    
    
Utility capital expenditures (418.8)   (518.3)  (635.9) 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (5.6)   (3.9)  (11.1) 
Purchases of nuclear decommissioning trust investments (31.9)   (50.9)  (27.5) 
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust investments 28.6
   47.6
  24.2
 
Net money pool lending 
   
  4.7
 
Other investing activities (23.8)   (25.5)  (15.2) 
Net cash from investing activities (451.5)   (551.0)  (660.8) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities  
    
    
Issuance of long-term debt 
   348.8
  
 
Issuance fees (0.2)   (3.0)  (0.4) 
Issuance of long-term debt from remarketing 
   146.5
  
 
Repayment of long-term debt from remarketing 
   (146.5)  
 
Repayment of long-term debt 
   (85.9)  
 
Net change in short-term borrowings (47.4)   (178.0)  265.1
 
Net money pool borrowings 
   (12.6)  12.4
 
Dividends paid to Great Plains Energy (122.0)   
  (72.0) 
Net cash from financing activities (169.6)   69.3
  205.1
 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 2.2
   (0.4)  (1.3) 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 2.3
   2.7
  4.0
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $4.5
   $2.3
  $2.7
��
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
      
Year Ended December 312018 2017 2016
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(millions)
Net income$162.9
 $179.8
 $225.0
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization281.3
 266.3
 247.5
Amortization of nuclear fuel26.2
 32.1
 26.6
Amortization of deferred refueling outage13.5
 18.3
 19.0
Net deferred income taxes and credits48.6
 82.5
 92.4
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(1.4) (6.0) (6.6)
Payments for asset retirement obligations(13.1) (25.5) (15.0)
Other3.9
 7.5
 8.8
Changes in working capital items:    

Accounts receivable36.5
 13.8
 (12.4)
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral
 (20.0) 
Fuel inventory and supplies19.4
 (5.2) 6.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets7.2
 8.4
 (73.2)
Accounts payable(34.6) 11.7
 (30.5)
Accrued taxes16.1
 9.1
 67.9
Other current liabilities10.4
 (0.1) 10.4
Changes in other assets42.9
 31.7
 66.5
Changes in other liabilities37.9
 6.5
 (9.4)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities657.7
 610.9
 623.3
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Additions to property, plant and equipment(430.7) (468.6) (447.9)
Purchase of securities - trusts(35.1) (33.6) (31.9)
Sale of securities - trusts27.1
 30.3
 28.6
Other investing activities4.8
 0.9
 (0.3)
Cash Flows (used in) Investing Activities(433.9) (471.0) (451.5)
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
  
  
Short term debt, net8.0
 34.6
 (47.4)
Collateralized short-term borrowings, net
 20.0
 
Proceeds from long-term debt465.6
 296.2
 
Retirements of long-term debt(519.9) (281.0) 
Cash dividends paid(180.0) (212.0) (122.0)
Other financing activities2.9
 
 (0.2)
Cash Flows (used in) Financing Activities(223.4) (142.2) (169.6)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS0.4
 (2.3) 2.2
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:     
Beginning of period2.2
 4.5
 2.3
End of period$2.6
 $2.2
 $4.5
The disclosures regarding KCP&L included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Common Shareholder's Equity
        
Year Ended December 312016 2015 2014
 Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
 (millions, except share amounts)
Common Stock1
 $1,563.1
 1
 $1,563.1
 1
 $1,563.1
Retained Earnings 
  
  
  
    
Beginning balance 
 879.6
  
 726.8
   636.4
Net income 
 225.0
  
 152.8
   162.4
Dividends: 
  
  
  
    
Common stock held by Great Plains Energy 
 (122.0)  
 
   (72.0)
Ending balance 
 982.6
  
 879.6
   726.8
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
  
  
    
Beginning balance 
 (9.6)  
 (14.9)   (20.2)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 
 5.4
  
 5.3
   5.3
Ending balance 
 (4.2)  
 (9.6)   (14.9)
Total Common Shareholder's Equity 
 $2,541.5
  
 $2,433.1
   $2,275.0
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
 
          
 Common stock shares Common stock Retained earnings AOCI - Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges Total equity
 (millions, except share amounts)
Balance as of December 31, 20151
 $1,563.1
 $879.6
 $(9.6) $2,433.1
Net income
 
 225.0
 
 225.0
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 (122.0) 
 (122.0)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax
 
 
 5.4
 5.4
Balance as of December 31, 20161
 1,563.1
 982.6
 (4.2) 2,541.5
Net income
 
 179.8
 
 179.8
Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2016-09
 
 (0.7) 
 (0.7)
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 (212.0) 
 (212.0)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax
 
 
 4.6
 4.6
Balance as of December 31, 20171
 1,563.1
 949.7
 0.4
 2,513.2
Net income
 
 162.9
 
 162.9
Dividends declared on common stock
 
 (180.0) 
 (180.0)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax
 
 
 3.7
 3.7
Balance as of December 31, 20181
 $1,563.1
 $932.6
 $4.1
 $2,499.8
The disclosures regarding KCP&L included in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.


GREAT PLAINSEVERGY, INC.
WESTAR ENERGY, INCORPORATEDINC.
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The notes to consolidated financial statements that follow are a combined presentation for Great PlainsEvergy, Inc., Westar Energy, IncorporatedInc. and Kansas City Power & Light Company, bothall registrants under this filing.  The terms "Great Plains"Evergy," "Westar Energy," "Company," "KCP&L" and "Companies""Evergy Companies" are used throughout this report.  "Great Plains"Evergy" refers to Evergy, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.  "Westar Energy" and the "Company" referrefers to Great PlainsWestar Energy, IncorporatedInc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. "KCP&L" refers to Kansas City Power & Light Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. "Companies"subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. "Evergy Companies" refers to Great PlainsEvergy, Westar Energy Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries and KCP&L, and itscollectively, which are individual registrants within the Evergy consolidated subsidiaries.group.  
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Great Plains Energy, a Missouri corporation incorporated in 2001,Evergy is a public utility holding company incorporated in 2017 and does not own or operate any significant assets other thanheadquartered in Kansas City, Missouri. Evergy operates primarily through the stock of its subsidiaries and cash and cash equivalents and a time deposit to be used to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of following wholly-owned direct subsidiaries:
Westar Energy Inc. (Westar).  Great Plains Energy's wholly owned direct subsidiariesis an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Kansas. Westar Energy has one active wholly-owned subsidiary with significant operations, are as follows:Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KGE).
KCP&L is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers primarily in the states of Missouri and Kansas.  KCP&L has one active wholly owned subsidiary, Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company (KCP&L Receivables Company).
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company (GMO) is an integrated, regulated electric utility that provides electricity to customers in the state of Missouri.  GMO also provides regulated steam service to certain customers in the St. Joseph, Missouri area.  GMO has two active wholly owned subsidiaries, GMO Receivables Company and MPS Merchant Services, Inc. (MPS Merchant).  MPS Merchant has certain long-term natural gas contracts remaining from its former non-regulated trading operations.
Great Plains Energy also wholly owns GPE Transmission Holding Company, LLC (GPETHC). GPETHC owns 13.5% of Transource Energy, LLC (Transource) with the remaining 86.5% owned by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, (AEPTHC), a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP). Transource is focused on the development of competitive electric transmission projects. GPETHC accounts for its investment in Transource under the equity method. Transource
Westar Energy also owns a 50% interest in Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC (Prairie Wind), which is focuseda joint venture between Westar Energy and affiliates of AEP and Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. Prairie Wind owns a 108-mile, 345 kV double-circuit transmission line that provides transmission service in the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP). Westar Energy accounts for its investment in Prairie Wind under the equity method.

Westar Energy and KGE conduct business in their respective service territories using the name Westar Energy. KCP&L and GMO conduct business in their respective service territories using the name KCP&L. Collectively, the Evergy Companies have approximately 14,500 MWs of owned generating capacity and renewable purchased power agreements and engage in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity to approximately 1.6 million customers in the states of Kansas and Missouri.
Evergy was incorporated in 2017 as Monarch Energy Holding, Inc. (Monarch Energy), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Great Plains Energy). Prior to the closing of the merger transactions, Monarch Energy changed its name to Evergy and did not conduct any business activities other than those required for its formation and matters contemplated by the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Great Plains Energy, Westar Energy, Monarch Energy and King Energy, Inc. (King Energy), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Monarch Energy (Amended Merger Agreement). On June 4, 2018, in accordance with the Amended Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy merged into Evergy, with Evergy surviving the merger and King Energy merged into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving the merger. These merger transactions resulted in Evergy becoming the parent entity of Westar Energy and the direct subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy, including KCP&L and GMO. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the merger.


Principles of Consolidation
Westar Energy was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the merger and thus, the predecessor of Evergy. Therefore, Evergy's consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations of Westar Energy for 2017 and 2016 and the financial position of Westar Energy as of December 31, 2017. Evergy had separate operations for the period beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2018, and references to amounts for periods after the closing of the merger relate to Evergy. The results of Great Plains Energy's direct subsidiaries have been included in Evergy's results of operations from the date of the closing of the merger and thereafter.
Westar Energy and KCP&L continue to be Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registrants. KCP&L has elected not to apply "push-down accounting" related to the merger, whereby the adjustments of assets and liabilities to fair value and the resulting goodwill would be recorded on the developmentfinancial statements of competitive electric transmission projects. the acquired subsidiary. These adjustments for KCP&L, as well as those related to the acquired assets and liabilities of Great Plains Energy and its other direct subsidiaries, are only reflected on Evergy's consolidated financial statements.
Each of Great PlainsEvergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's consolidated financial statements includes the accounts of their subsidiaries.subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) of which they are the primary beneficiary. Undivided interests in jointly-owned generation facilities are included on a proportionate basis.  Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The Evergy Companies assess financial performance and allocate resources on a consolidated basis (i.e., operate in one segment).
Certain changes in classification and corresponding reclassification of prior period data were made in Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's consolidated balance sheets, statements of income and comprehensive income and statements of cash flows for comparative purposes. Evergy reflects the classifications of Westar Energy as the accounting acquirer in the merger. These reclassifications did not affect Evergy's, Westar Energy's or KCP&L's net income or Evergy's, Westar Energy's or KCP&L's cash flows from operations, investing or financing.
Most significantly for Westar Energy's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, was the reclassification of $50.2 million from accrued employee benefits (currently reported as pension and post-retirement liability) to other long-term liabilities. Most significantly for KCP&L's consolidated balance sheets, current regulatory assets and liabilities have been presented separately from the non-current portions in each respective consolidated balance sheet where recovery or refund is expected within the next 12 months.



The table below summarizes KCP&L's reclassifications related to operating and investing activities for its consolidated statement of cash flows for 2017 and 2016.
  2017 2016
  As Previously Filed As Recast As Previously Filed As Recast
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: (in millions)
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities:        
Amortization of other $30.2
 $
 $33.9
 $
Amortization of deferred refueling outage 
 18.3
 
 19.0
Deferred income taxes, net 83.5
 
 93.4
 
Investment tax credit amortization (1.0) 
 (1.0) 
Net deferred income taxes and credits 
 82.5
 
 92.4
Payments for asset retirement obligations (25.5) (25.5) 
 (15.0)
Other/Solar rebates paid(a)
 (9.0) 7.5
 1.4
 8.8
Changes in working capital items:        
Fuel inventory and supplies 
 (5.2) 
 6.3
Fuel inventories(a)
 1.9
 
 10.6
 
Materials and supplies(a)
 (7.1) 
 (4.3) 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
 8.4
 
 (73.2)
Other current liabilities 
 (0.1) 
 10.4
Changes in other assets 
 31.7
 
 66.5
Changes in other liabilities 
 6.5
 
 (9.4)
Deferred refueling outage costs(a)
 15.5
 
 (3.1) 
Pension and post-retirement benefit obligations(a)
 27.3
 
 28.6
 
Fuel recovery mechanisms(a)
 8.3
 
 (53.7) 
Total reclassifications $124.1
 $124.1
 $105.8
 $105.8
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Additions to property, plant and equipment $
 $(468.6) $
 $(447.9)
Utility capital expenditures (437.7) 
 (418.8) 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction (6.1) 
 (5.6) 
Other investing activities (23.9) 0.9
 (23.8) (0.3)
Total reclassifications $(467.7) $(467.7) $(448.2) $(448.2)
(a)Previously reported within Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements of the Great Plains Energy's sole reportable business segment is electric utility.  See Note 23 for additional information.Energy and KCP&L combined 2017 and 2016 Annual Reports on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principlesgenerally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at acquisition.
Time Deposit
Consists

Fuel Inventory and Supplies
The Evergy Companies record fuel inventory and supplies at average cost. The following table separately states the balances for fuel inventory and supplies.
 December 31
 2018 2017
Evergy(millions)
Fuel inventory$168.9
 $94.1
Supplies342.1
 199.5
Fuel inventory and supplies$511.0
 $293.6
Westar Energy   
Fuel inventory$87.8
 $94.1
Supplies189.0
 199.5
Fuel inventory and supplies$276.8
 $293.6
KCP&L (a)
   
Fuel inventory$57.8
 $71.0
Supplies119.8
 126.0
Fuel inventory and supplies$177.6
 $197.0
(a) KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy at December 31, 2017.
Property, Plant and Equipment
The Evergy Companies record the value of a non-negotiable fixed rate investment in a time deposit with an original maturityproperty, plant and equipment, including that of greater than three months and is recorded on the balance sheetvariable interest entities (VIEs), at cost. For plant, cost includes contracted services, direct labor and materials, indirect charges for engineering and supervision and an allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC). AFUDC represents the allowed cost of capital used to finance utility construction activity. AFUDC equity funds are included as a non-cash item in other income and AFUDC borrowed funds are a reduction of interest expense. AFUDC is computed by applying a composite rate to qualified construction work in progress. The time deposit maturesrates used to compute gross AFUDC are compounded semi-annually.
The amounts of the Evergy Companies' AFUDC for borrowed and equity funds are detailed in the first quarter of 2017 andfollowing table.
 2018 2017 2016
Evergy(millions)
AFUDC borrowed funds$10.4
 $5.6
 $10.0
AFUDC equity funds3.1
 2.0
 11.6
Total$13.5
 $7.6
 $21.6
Westar Energy     
AFUDC borrowed funds$6.6
 $5.6
 $10.0
AFUDC equity funds2.9
 2.0
 11.6
Total$9.5
 $7.6
 $21.6
KCP&L(a)
     
AFUDC borrowed funds$4.9
 $6.1
 $5.6
AFUDC equity funds1.4
 6.0
 6.6
Total$6.3
 $12.1
 $12.2
(a)KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the proceeds from this investment are expected to be used to fund a portiondate of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar. The Company estimates the fair valueclosing of the time deposit, which approximates its carryingmerger, June 4, 2018 through December 31, 2018.


value, using Level 2 inputs based on current interestThe average rates for similar investments with comparable credit risk and time to maturity.used in the calculation of AFUDC are detailed in the following table.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
 2018 2017 2016
Westar Energy3.3% 2.3% 4.2%
KCP&L3.9% 4.9% 5.7%
GMO2.9% 1.9% 1.6%
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund - KCP&L's nuclear decommissioning trust fund assets are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the fund and/or valuation models.
Derivative instruments - The fair value of commodity derivative instruments is estimated using market quotes, over-the-counter forward price and volatility curves and correlation among fuel prices, net of estimated credit risk. The fair value of interest rate derivative instruments is determined by calculating the net present value of expected payments and receipts under interest rate swaps using observable market inputs including interest rates and LIBOR swap rates. Management also discounts the value by a contingency factor that it believes is representative of what a market participant would use in valuing these instruments in order to account for the contingent nature of the settlement of these instruments.
Pension plans - For financial reporting purposes, the market value of plan assets is the fair value. For regulatory reporting purposes, a five-year smoothing of assets is used to determine fair value.
Derivative Instruments
The Company records derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with GAAP. Great Plains Energy and KCP&L enter into derivative contracts to manage exposure to commodity price and interest rate fluctuations. Derivative instruments are used solely for hedging purposes and are not issued or held for speculative reasons.
The Company considers various qualitative factors, such as contract and market place attributes, in designating derivative instruments at inception. Great Plains Energy and KCP&L may elect the normal purchases and normal sales (NPNS) exception, which requires the effects of the derivative to be recorded when the underlying contract settles. Great Plains Energy and KCP&L account for derivative instruments that are not designated as NPNS as non-hedging derivatives, which are recorded as assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. See Note 19 for additional information regarding derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements, which include rights to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable), or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable).
Utility Plant
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's utility plant is stated at historical cost. These costs include taxes, an allowance for the cost of borrowed and equity funds used to finance construction and payroll-related costs, including pensions and other fringe benefits. Replacements, improvements and additions to units of property are capitalized. Repairs of property and replacements of items not considered to be units of property are expensed as incurred (except as discussed under Deferred Refueling Outage Costs). When property units are retired or otherwise disposed, the original cost net of salvage is charged to accumulated depreciation. Substantially allRepair of KCP&L's utility plantproperty and replacement of items not considered to be units of property are expensed as incurred, except for planned refueling and maintenance outages at Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek). As authorized by regulators, the expense is pledged as collateraldeferred and amortized ratably over the period between planned outages incremental maintenance cost incurred for KCP&L's mortgage bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated December 1, 1986, as supplemented. A portion of GMO's utility plant is pledged as collateral for GMO's mortgage bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated April 1, 1946, as supplemented.
As prescribed by The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) is charged to the cost of the plant during construction. AFUDC equity funds are included as a non-cash item in non-operating income and AFUDC borrowed funds are a reduction of interest charges. The rates used to compute gross AFUDC are compounded semi-annually. The rates used to compute gross AFUDC for


KCP&L averaged 5.7% in 2016, 3.0% in 2015 and 5.7% in 2014. The rates used to compute gross AFUDC for GMO averaged 1.6% in 2016, 4.2% in 2015 and 6.1% in 2014.
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's balances of utility plant, at original cost, with a range of estimated useful lives are listed in the following tables.
Great Plains Energy    
December 31 2016 2015
Utility plant, at original cost (millions)
Generation (20 - 60 years) $8,106.4
 $7,923.8
Transmission (15 - 70 years) 886.3
 848.8
Distribution (8 - 66 years) 3,629.1
 3,498.6
General (5 - 50 years) 975.9
 918.7
Total (a)
 $13,597.7
 $13,189.9
(a) Includes $261.2 million and $214.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of land and other assets that are not depreciated.
KCP&L    
December 31 2016 2015
Utility plant, at original cost (millions)
Generation (20 - 60 years) $6,350.7
 $6,222.5
Transmission (15 - 70 years) 484.1
 465.3
Distribution (8 - 55 years) 2,298.4
 2,215.2
General (5 - 50 years) 791.9
 737.4
Total (a)
 $9,925.1
 $9,640.4
(a) Includes $178.0 million and $136.5 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, of land and other assets that are not depreciated.such outages.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of utility plant other than nuclear fuel is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated lives of depreciable property based on rates approved by state regulatory authorities. Annual depreciation rates average approximately 3%. Nuclear fuel is amortized to fuel expense based on the quantity of heat produced during the generation of electricity. See Note 7 for more details.
Great PlainsThe depreciable lives of Evergy's, Westar Energy's depreciation expense was $308.8 million, $299.4 million and $277.9 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. KCP&L's property, plant and equipment are detailed in the following table.
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
  (years)
Generating facilities 8to87 8to87 20to60
Transmission facilities 15to94 36to94 15to70
Distribution facilities 8to73 19to73 8to55
Other 5to84 7to84 5to50
Plant to be Retired, Net
When the Evergy Companies retire utility plant, the original cost, net of salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. However, when it becomes probable an asset will be retired significantly in advance of its original expected useful life and in the near term, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation expense was $215.4is recognized as a separate asset and a probable abandonment. If the asset is still in service, the net amount is classified as plant to be retired, net on the consolidated balance sheets. If the asset is no longer in service, the net amount is classified as a regulatory asset on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Evergy Companies must also assess the probability of full recovery of the remaining net book value of the abandonment. The net book value that may be retained as an asset on the balance sheet for the abandonment is dependent upon amounts that may be recovered through regulated rates, including any return. An impairment charge, if any, would equal the difference between the remaining net book value of the asset and the present value of the future revenues expected from the asset.
In June 2017, GMO announced the expected retirement of certain older generating units, including GMO's Sibley No. 3 Unit, over the next several years. GMO determined that Sibley No. 3 Unit met the criteria to be considered probable of abandonment. GMO retired Sibley Station, including the No. 3 Unit, in November 2018. As of December 31, 2018, Evergy has classified the remaining Sibley No. 3 Unit net book value of $159.9 million $208.5 millionas retired generation facilities within regulatory assets on its consolidated balance sheet. Evergy is currently allowed a full recovery of and $189.7 million for 2016, 2015a full return on Sibley No. 3 Unit in rates and 2014, respectively.has concluded that no impairment is required as of December 31, 2018.


Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Costs
Nuclear plant decommissioning cost estimates are based on either the immediate dismantlement method or the deferred dismantling method as determined by the KCC and MPSC and include the costs of decontamination, dismantlement and site restoration. Based on these cost estimates, Westar Energy and KCP&L contributescontribute to a tax-qualified trust fund to be used to decommission Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek).Creek. Related liabilities for decommissioning are included on Great PlainsEvergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's consolidated balance sheets in Asset Retirement Obligations (AROs).
As a result of the authorized regulatory treatment and related regulatory accounting, differences between the decommissioning trust fund asset and the related ARO are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability. See Note 86 for discussion of AROs including those associated with nuclear plant decommissioning costs.
Deferred Refueling Outage CostsRegulatory Accounting
KCP&L usesAccounting standards are applied that recognize the deferral method to account for operations and maintenance expenses incurred in support of Wolf Creek's scheduled refueling outages and amortizes them evenly (monthly) over the unit's operating cycle, which is


approximately 18 months, until the next scheduled outage. Replacement power costs during an outage are expensed as incurred.
Regulatory Matters
KCP&L and GMO defer items on the balance sheet resulting from theeconomic effects of the ratemaking process, which would not berate regulation. Accordingly, regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded if KCP&L and GMO were not regulated.when required by a regulatory order or based on regulatory precedent. See Note 65 for additional information concerning regulatory matters.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
Amounts related to corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets in other long-terms assets and are detailed in the following table for Evergy. Substantially all of Evergy's COLI-related balances relate to Westar Energy's COLI activity.
  December 31
  2018 2017
Evergy (millions)
Cash surrender value of policies $1,441.7
 $1,320.7
Borrowings against policies (1,306.9) (1,189.2)
Corporate-owned life insurance, net $134.8
 $131.5
Increases in cash surrender value and death benefits are recorded in other income in the Evergy Companies' consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. Interest expense incurred on policy loans is offset against the policy income. Income from death benefits is highly variable from period to period.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the following financial instruments for which it was practicable to estimate that value.
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund - The Evergy Companies' nuclear decommissioning trust fund assets are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the fund and/or valuation models.
Pension plans - For financial reporting purposes, the market value of plan assets is the fair value.
Revenue Recognition
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies recognize revenuesrevenue on salesthe sale of electricity whento customers over time as the service is provided.provided in the amount they have the right to invoice. Revenues recorded include electric services provided but not yet billed by KCP&L and GMO.the Evergy Companies. Unbilled revenues are recorded for kWh usage in the period following the customers' billing cycle to the end of the month. KCP&L's and GMO'sThis estimate is based on net system kWh usage less actual billed kWhs. KCP&L's and GMO'sThe Evergy Companies' estimated unbilled kWhs are allocated and priced by regulatory jurisdiction across the rate classes based on actual billing rates.
The Evergy Companies' unbilled revenue estimate is affected by factors including fluctuations in energy demand, weather, line losses and changes in the composition of customer classes. See Note 4 for the balance of unbilled receivables for each of Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L as of December 31, 2018 and GMO2017.
The Evergy Companies also collect sales taxes and franchise fees from customers gross receipts taxesconcurrent with revenue-producing activities that are levied by state and local governments. These taxesitems are excluded from KCP&L's Missouri customersrevenue, and


thus are recorded gross in operating revenues and general taxesnot reflected on Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sthe consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. KCP&L's gross receipts taxes collected from Missouri customers were $70.3 million, $62.0 million and $60.4 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These taxes from KCP&L's Kansas customers and GMO's customers are recorded net in operating revenues on Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's statements of comprehensive income.
Great Plainsincome for Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L collect&L.
See Note 3 for additional details regarding revenue recognition from sales taxes from customers and remit to state and local governments. These taxes are presented on a net basis on Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's statements of comprehensive income.electricity by the Evergy Companies.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L record sale and purchase activity on a net basis in wholesale revenue or purchased power when transacting with Regional Transmission Organization (RTO)/Independent System Operator (ISO) markets.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
This reserve represents estimated uncollectibleThe Evergy Companies determine their allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and is based on management's judgment considering historical loss experience and the characteristicsage of existing accounts. Provisions for losses on receivables are expensed to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover expected losses.their receivables. Receivables are charged off against the reserve when they are deemed uncollectible.uncollectible, which is based on a number of factors including specific facts surrounding an account and management's judgment.
Property Gains and Losses
Net gains and losses from the sale of assets and businesses and from asset impairments are recorded in operating expenses.
Asset Impairments
Long-lived assets and finite-lived intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows from an asset to be held and used is less than the carrying value of the asset, an asset impairment must be recognized in the financial statements. The amount of impairment recognized is the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually and when an event occurs indicating the possibility that an impairment exists. The annual test must be performed at the same time each year. IfEvergy's first impairment test for the $2,338.9 million of goodwill from the Great Plains Energy and Westar Energy merger will be conducted on May 1, 2019. The goodwill impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of a reporting unit is less thanto its carrying valueamount, including goodwill, an impairment charge for goodwill must be recognized into identify potential impairment. In the financial statements. To measureevent that the carrying amount ofexceeds the impairment loss to recognize, the implied fair value of the reporting unit, goodwillan impairment loss is compared withrecognized for the difference between the carrying amount of the reporting unit and its carryingfair value.


Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset/liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies recognize tax benefits based on a “more-likely-than-not”"more-likely-than-not" recognition threshold. In addition, Great Plains Energy and KCP&Lthe Evergy Companies recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in non-operatingoperating expenses.
Great Plains EnergyEvergy files a consolidated federal income tax return as well as unitary and combined income tax returns in several state jurisdictions with Kansas and Missouri being the most significant. Income taxes for consolidated or combined subsidiaries are allocated to the subsidiaries based on separate company computations of income or loss. Westar Energy's and KCP&L's income tax provision includesprovisions include taxes allocated based on itstheir separate companycompany's income or loss.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies have established a net regulatory assetliability for future refunds to be made to customers for the additional future revenues to be collected from customers for deferredover-collection of income taxes.taxes in rates. Tax credits are recognized in the year generated except for certain Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO investment tax credits that have been deferred and amortized over the remaining service lives of the related properties.
Environmental Matters
Environmental costs are accrued when it is probable a liability has been incurred and

Other Income (Expense), Net
The table below shows the amountdetail of other expense for each of the liability can be reasonably estimated.Evergy Companies.
Basic and Diluted
 2018 2017 2016
Evergy(millions)
Non-service cost component of net benefit cost$(47.8) $(20.0) $(20.6)
Other(30.9) (19.1) (18.0)
Other expense$(78.7) $(39.1) $(38.6)
Westar Energy     
Non-service cost component of net benefit cost$(23.5) $(20.0) $(20.6)
Other(23.3) (19.1) (18.0)
Other expense$(46.8) $(39.1) $(38.6)
KCP&L(a)
     
Non-service cost component of net benefit cost$(25.9) $(42.7) $(37.2)
Other(5.0) (8.1) (7.6)
Other expense$(30.9) $(50.8) $(44.8)
(a)KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018 through December 31, 2018.
Earnings per CommonPer Share Calculation
To determinecompute basic earnings per common share (EPS), preferred stock dividend requirements and redemption premium are deducted fromEvergy divides net income before dividingattributable to Evergy, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. To determine dilutedDiluted EPS preferred stock dividend requirements are added to earnings available for common shareholders forincludes the periods in which the assumed conversioneffect of Great Plains Energy's 7.00% Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock) has a dilutive effect before dividing by the diluted average number ofissuable common shares outstanding. The effect of dilutive securities assumes the issuance of common shares applicable toresulting from restricted share units (RSUs), performance shares and restricted stock calculatedstock. Evergy computes the dilutive effects of potential issuances of common shares using the treasury stock method and the number of common shares that would be issued under an assumed conversion of Series B Preferred Stock using the if-converted method.
The following table reconciles Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's basic and diluted EPS.
2016 2015 2014
(millions, except per share amounts)2018 2017 2016
Income     (millions, except per share amounts)
Net income$290.0
 $213.0
 $242.8
$546.0
 $336.5
 $361.2
Less: preferred stock dividend requirements and redemption premium16.5
 1.6
 1.6
Earnings available for common shareholders$273.5
 $211.4
 $241.2
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests10.2
 12.6
 14.6
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc.$535.8
 $323.9
 $346.6
Common Shares Outstanding 
  
  
   
  
Average number of common shares outstanding169.4
 154.2
 153.9
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic213.9
 142.5
 142.1
Add: effect of dilutive securities0.4
 0.6
 0.2
0.2
 0.1
 0.4
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding169.8
 154.8
 154.1
214.1
 142.6
 142.5
Basic and Diluted EPS$1.61
 $1.37
 $1.57
$2.50
 $2.27
 $2.43


Anti-dilutive sharesThere were no anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted EPS are detailed in the following table.for 2018, 2017 and 2016.


Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 2016 2015 2014
Assumed conversion of Series B Preferred Stock7,805,460
 
 
Performance shares
 
 482,987
Restricted stock shares
 900
 3,287
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
Evergy (millions)
Cash paid for (received from):      
Interest on financing activities, net of amount capitalized $255.9
 $153.9
 $139.0
Interest on financing activities of VIEs 2.3
 3.1
 5.8
Income taxes, net of refunds (0.9) (12.7) 13.1
Non-cash investing transactions:      
Property, plant and equipment additions (reductions) (7.8) 158.8
 151.5
Deconsolidation of property, plant and equipment of VIE 
 (72.9) 
Non-cash financing transactions:      
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends 0.5
 5.1
 9.7
Deconsolidation of VIE 
 (83.1) 
Assets acquired through capital leases 1.2
 4.8
 2.7
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
Westar Energy (millions)
Cash paid for (received from):      
Interest on financing activities, net of amount capitalized $155.3
 $153.9
 $139.0
Interest on financing activities of VIEs 2.3
 3.1
 5.8
Income taxes, net of refunds 37.5
 (12.7) 13.1
Non-cash investing transactions:      
Property, plant and equipment additions (reductions) (32.5) 158.8
 151.5
Deconsolidation of property, plant and equipment of VIE 
 (72.9) 
Non-cash financing transactions:      
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends 
 5.1
 9.7
Deconsolidation of VIE 
 (83.1) 
Assets acquired through capital leases 1.2
 4.8
 2.7
Year Ended December 31 2018 2017 2016
KCP&L(a)
 (millions)
Cash paid for (received from):      
Interest on financing activities, net of amount capitalized $129.4
 $128.0
 $127.0
Income taxes, net of refunds 31.2
 38.8
 (37.3)
Non-cash investing transactions:      
Property, plant and equipment additions 19.2
 36.6
 75.4
(a)KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
See Note 2 for the non-cash information related to the merger transaction, including the fair value of Great Plains Energy's assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the issuance of Evergy common stock.
Dividends Declared
In February 2017, Great Plains Energy's2019, Evergy's Board of Directors (Board)(Evergy Board) declared a quarterly dividend of $0.275$0.475 per share on Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's common stock.  The common dividend is payable March 20, 2017,2019, to shareholders of record as of February 27, 2017.  
The Board also declared a regular quarterly dividend on Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock. The dividend will be payable March 15, 2017, to shareholders of record as of March 1, 2017.

2019
.
In February 2017, KCP&L's2019, Westar Energy's Board of Directors declared a cash dividend payable to Great Plains EnergyEvergy of $57$110.0 million, payable on March 17, 2017.19, 2019.


New Accounting Standards
Intangibles - Internal-Use Software
In May 2014,August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09,2018-15, Revenue from ContractsCustomer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which aligns the requirements for recording implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with Customersthe requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. An entity in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract will need to determine which project stage (that is, preliminary project stage, application development stage or post-implementation stage) an implementation activity relates. Costs for implementation activities in the application development stage are recorded as a prepaid asset depending on the nature of the costs, while costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are expensed as the activities are incurred. Costs that are recorded to a prepaid asset are to be expensed over the term of the hosting arrangement. The new guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance can be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The Evergy Companies early adopted ASU No. 2018-15 prospectively as of January 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU No. 2018-15 did not have a material impact on the Evergy Companies.

Compensation - Retirement Benefits
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits, which requires an entityemployer to recognizedisaggregate the amountservice cost component from the other components of revenue to which it expectsnet benefit cost. The service cost component is to be entitledreported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The non-service cost components are to be reported separately from service costs and outside of a subtotal of income from operations. The amendments in this update allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization as part of utility plant. The non-service cost components that are no longer eligible for capitalization as part of utility plant will be recorded as a regulatory asset. The new guidance is to be applied retrospectively for the transferpresentation of promised goods or servicesservice cost and non-service cost components in the income statement and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component and is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Evergy Companies adopted ASU No. 2017-07 on January 1, 2018, and accordingly have retrospectively adjusted prior periods. The Evergy Companies utilized the practical expedient that allows for the use of amounts disclosed in Note 9 for applying the retrospective presentation to customers. the 2017 and 2016 consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.


The following table reflects the retrospective adjustments in the line items of Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income associated with the adoption of ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidanceNo. 2017-07.
 2017 2016
 
As Previously Reported (b)
 
Effect of
Change
 As Reported 
As Previously Reported (b)
 
Effect of
Change
 As Reported
Evergy(millions)
Operating and maintenance
   expense
$583.5
 $(20.0) $563.5
 $607.8
 $(20.6) $587.2
Total operating expenses1,912.2
 (20.0) 1,892.2
 1,880.3
 (20.6) 1,859.7
Income from operations658.8
 20.0
 678.8
 681.8
 20.6
 702.4
Other expense(19.1) (20.0) (39.1) (18.0) (20.6) (38.6)
Total other income (expense), net(6.8) (20.0) (26.8) 19.1
 (20.6) (1.5)
Westar Energy    
      
Operating and maintenance
   expense
$583.5
 $(20.0) $563.5
 $607.8
 $(20.6) $587.2
Total operating expenses1,912.2
 (20.0) 1,892.2
 1,880.3
 (20.6) 1,859.7
Income from operations658.8
 20.0
 678.8
 681.8
 20.6
 702.4
Other expense(19.1) (20.0) (39.1) (18.0) (20.6) (38.6)
Total other income (expense), net(6.8) (20.0) (26.8) 19.1
 (20.6) (1.5)
KCP&L (a)
    
      
Operating and maintenance
   expense
$517.5
 $(42.7) $474.8
 $539.2
 $(37.2) $502.0
Total operating expenses1,447.0
 (42.7) 1,404.3
 1,393.3
 (37.2) 1,356.1
Income from operations443.7
 42.7
 486.4
 482.1
 37.2
 519.3
Other expense(8.1) (42.7) (50.8) (7.6) (37.2) (44.8)
Total other income (expense), net3.1
 (42.7) (39.6) 4.2
 (37.2) (33.0)
(a)KCP&L amounts are not included in GAAP when it becomes effective. consolidated Evergy for 2017 and 2016.
(b)Certain Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L as previously reported amounts have been adjusted to reflect reclassification adjustments made for comparative purposes as discussed further in Principles of Consolidation above and that have no impact on net income.
Statement of Cash Flows
In August 2015,2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, deferring2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. Among other clarifications, the guidance requires that cash proceeds received from the settlement of COLI policies be classified as cash inflows from investing activities and that cash payments for premiums on COLI policies may be classified as cash outflows for investing activities, operating activities or a combination of both. Retrospective application is required. The Evergy Companies adopted the guidance effective dateJanuary 1, 2018, which resulted in retrospective reclassification of cash proceeds of $2.8 million and $22.1 million from the settlement of COLI policies from cash inflows from operating activities to cash inflows from investing activities for 2017 and 2016, respectively, for Evergy and Westar Energy.  In addition, cash payments of $3.1 million and $3.4 million for premiums on COLI policies were reclassified from cash outflows used in operating activities to cash outflows used in investing activities for the same periods, respectively, for Evergy and Westar Energy. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 one year, from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2018. The Companies plan to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Companies have completed a review of the majority of their revenue arrangements and do2016-15 did not expect the standard to have a material impact on their consolidated financial statements. However,KCP&L.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, which requires that the statement of cash flows explains the change for the period of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents along with cash and cash equivalents. The guidance requires a retrospective transition method and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Evergy Companies are still evaluatingadopted the impactsguidance effective January 1, 2018. As a result, Evergy and Westar Energy adjusted amounts previously reported for cash and cash equivalents to


include restricted cash, which resulted in an increase to beginning and ending cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $0.1 million for 2017 and 2016. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 did not have a material impact on revenue recognition of their remaining revenue arrangements and contracts where collectability is uncertain, as well as the accounting for contributions in aid of construction. The Companies are in the process of determining their method of adoption, which depends in part on completing the evaluation of the remaining items noted above.KCP&L.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases(Topic 842), which requires an entity that is a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for lease payments on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  TheLessor accounting remains largely unchanged. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01, which permits entities to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under Topic 842 land easements that exist or expired before the entity’s adoption of Topic 842 and that were not previously accounted for as leases under Topic 840. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, "Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases," which updates narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU 2016-02. Also in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, "Leases, Targeted Improvements," which provides an optional transition method that allows entities to initially apply the new guidancestandard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption without restating prior periods. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20, "Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors," which is expected to reduce a lessor’s implementation and ongoing costs associated with applying ASU 2016-02. ASU 2016-02 and the subsequent amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be applied usingrequires a modified retrospective transition approach with an option to either adjust or not adjust comparative periods. 
The Evergy Companies are evaluatingadopted the effect thatnew guidance on January 1, 2019, without adjusting comparative periods for all leases existing as of January 1, 2019, by electing the optional transition method permitted by ASU No. 2016-022018-11. As a result, Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L recorded an increase to assets and liabilities of approximately $110 million, $40 million and $80 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. The Evergy Companies do not expect the impact of adoption of the standard will have a material impact on their consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Evergy Companies will include additional disclosures about its right-of-use assets, lease liabilities and lease expense in the first quarter 2019 notes to financial statements and related disclosures and have not yet determined the effectstatements. The Evergy Companies also elected a practical expedient to forgo reassessing existing or expired contracts as leases to determine whether each is in scope of the new standard on their ongoing financial reporting.and to forgo reassessing lease classification for existing and expired leases.
Financial Instruments
In MarchJanuary 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,2016-01, Compensation-Stock CompensationFinancial Instruments - Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which is intendedgenerally requires equity investments to simplify several areas of accounting for share-based compensation arrangements, includingbe measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Under the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures.new standard, equity securities are no longer to be classified as available-for-sale or trading securities. The newguidance requires a modified retrospective transition method. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance will be applied either prospectively, retrospectively or using a modified retrospective transition method, depending on the area covered in this update. The Companies adopted ASU No. 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017 and it will not have a significant impact on their ongoing financial reporting.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which eliminates Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by computing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill and comparing it with the carrying amount of that goodwill in the event that the reporting unit does not pass Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments in this ASU, a goodwill impairment loss would be measured by the amount the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds
Table of Contents


its fair value as calculated in Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. The new guidance is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019,2017; accordingly, the Evergy Companies adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018, without a material impact on their consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with early adoption permittedCustomers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for tests performedthe transfer of promised goods or services to customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, deferring the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year, from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2018. The ASU replaced most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it became effective. The Evergy Companies adopted ASU No. 2014-09 and its related amendments (Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606) on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2017. Great Plains Energy anticipates early adopting ASU No. 2017-042018, are presented under ASC 606 while historical periods have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the legacy guidance in ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition.
There was no cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in 2018 for its 2017 goodwill impairment testthe Evergy Companies as a result of the adoption of the new guidance. As a result of the adoption of ASC 606, operating
Table of Contents


revenues and does not anticipatetaxes other than income taxes on KCP&L's statements of comprehensive income decreased $76.4 million for 2018. This impact was related to sales taxes and franchise fees collected from KCP&L's Missouri customers that it will have a significant impactwere included in KCP&L's operating revenues and taxes other than income taxes on its ongoing financial reporting.KCP&L's statements of comprehensive income prior to the adoption of ASC 606. See Note 3 for more information on revenue from contracts with customers.
2. ANTICIPATED ACQUISITIONMERGER OF GREAT PLAINS ENERGY AND WESTAR ENERGY INC.
Description of Merger Transaction
On May 29, 2016,June 4, 2018, Evergy completed the mergers contemplated by the Amended Merger Agreement. As a result of the mergers, Great Plains Energy enteredmerged into an AgreementEvergy, with Evergy surviving the merger and PlanKing Energy merged into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving the merger. Following the completion of Merger (Merger Agreement) bythese mergers, Westar Energy and among Great Plains Energy, Westar, and, from and after its accession to the Merger Agreement, GP Star, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiarydirect subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy, including KCP&L and GMO, became wholly-owned subsidiaries of Evergy.
The merger was structured as a merger of equals in the Statea tax-free exchange of Kansas (Merger Sub). Pursuantshares that involved no premium paid or received with respect to the Merger Agreement, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into Westar, with Westar continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon closing, pursuant to the Merger Agreement,either Great Plains Energy will acquireor Westar for (i) $51.00 in cash and (ii)Energy. As a number, rounded toresult of the nearest 1/10,000closing of athe merger transaction, each outstanding share of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock equal to the Exchange Ratio (as described below) forwas converted into 0.5981 shares of Evergy common stock and each outstanding share of Westar Energy common stock issuedwas converted into 1 share of Evergy common stock.
As provided in the Amended Merger Agreement, substantially all of Westar Energy's outstanding equity compensation awards vested and outstanding immediately priorwere converted into a right to the effective time of the merger, with Westar becoming a wholly owned subsidiaryreceive Evergy common stock and all of Great Plains Energy.

The Exchange Ratio is calculated as follows:

If the volume-weighted average share price of Great Plains Energy common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the twenty consecutive full trading days ending on (and including) the third trading day immediately priorEnergy's outstanding equity compensation awards were converted into equivalent Evergy awards subject to the closing date of the merger (the Great Plains Energy Average Stock Price) is:
(a) greater than $33.2283, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.2709;
(b) greater than or equal to $28.5918 but less than or equal to $33.2283, the Exchange Ratio will be an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) $9.00 by (y)same terms and conditions at the Great Plains Energy Average Stock Price; ormerger exchange ratio of 0.5981.
(c) less than $28.5918,Merger Related Regulatory Matters
KCC
In May 2018, the Exchange Ratio will be 0.3148.
Financing
Great Plains Energy plans to finance the cash portion of the merger consideration with equity and debt financing, including (i) $750 million of mandatory convertible preferred equity pursuant to a stock purchase agreement with OCM Credit Portfolio LP (OMERS), (ii) approximately $2.35 billion of equity comprised of a combination of Great Plains Energy common stock and additional mandatory convertible preferred stock, which, as discussed below, was completed in October 2016, and (iii) approximately $4.4 billion in debt.

On May 29, 2016, in connection with the Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy entered into a commitment letter for a 364-day senior unsecured bridge term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $8.017 billion (which has subsequently been reduced to $5.1 billion) to support the anticipated transaction and provide flexibility for the timing of long-term financing. See Note 11 for additional information.

On May 29, 2016, Great Plains Energy entered into a stock purchase agreement with OMERS, pursuant to which Great Plains Energy will issue and sell to OMERS 750,000 shares of preferred stock of Great Plains Energy designated as 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (Series A Preferred Stock), without par value, for an aggregate purchase price equal to $750 million at the closing of the merger. See Note 14 for additional information.

On October 3, 2016, Great Plains Energy completed a registered public offering of 60.5 million shares of common stock, without par value, at a public offering price of $26.45 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.6 billion (net proceeds of approximately $1.55 billion after issuance costs). Concurrent with this offering, Great Plains Energy also completed a registered public offering of 17.3 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock, without par value, at a public offering
Table of Contents


price of $50 per depositary share for total gross proceeds of $862.5 million (net proceeds of approximately $836.2 million after issuance costs). See Note 14 for additional information on the Series B Preferred Stock.
Regulatory and Shareholder Approvals
Great Plains Energy's anticipated acquisition of Westar was unanimously approved by the Great Plains Energy Board and Westar's Board of Directors (Westar Board). In September 2016, shareholders of Great Plains Energy and Westar approved all proposals necessary for Great Plains Energy's acquisition of Westar at each company's respective shareholder meeting. The anticipated acquisition remains subject to regulatory approvals from The State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas (KCC), approved Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's and Westar Energy's joint application for approval of the merger, including a settlement agreement that had been reached between Great Plains Energy, KCP&L, Westar Energy, KCC staff and certain other intervenors in the case. Through the joint application and settlement agreement, Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and Westar Energy agreed to the conditions and obligations listed below, in addition to other organizational, financing, customer service and civic responsibility commitments.
Provide a total of $30.6 million of one-time bill credits to Kansas electric retail customers as soon as practicable following the close of the merger and the completion of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's current rate cases in Kansas. Of this total, $23.1 million of the credits relate to Westar Energy customers and the remaining $7.5 million of credits relate to KCP&L Kansas customers.
Provide a total of approximately $46 million in additional bill credits consisting of $11.5 million in annual bill credits to Kansas electric retail customers from 2019 through 2022. Of the annual amount, $8.7 million of the credits relate to Westar Energy customers and the remaining $2.8 million of credits relate to KCP&L Kansas customers.
Provide for the inclusion of a total of $30.0 million of merger-related savings in Westar Energy's and KCP&L's current rate cases in Kansas. Of this total, $22.5 million of the savings are attributable to Westar Energy with the remaining $7.5 million of savings attributable to KCP&L's Kansas jurisdiction.
A five-year base rate moratorium for Westar Energy and KCP&L in Kansas that commenced following the conclusion of KCP&L's current Kansas rate case in December 2018. The moratorium is subject to certain conditions and does not include Westar Energy's or KCP&L's fuel recovery mechanisms and certain other cost recovery mechanisms in Kansas.
Table of Contents


Require both Westar Energy and KCP&L to file rate cases in Kansas in a fashion that would allow for updated electric utility rates to become effective upon the end of the five-year rate moratorium in December 2023.
Participate in an Earnings Review and Sharing Plan for the years 2019 through 2022, which may result in Westar Energy and/or KCP&L being subject to refunding 50% of earned return on equity in excess of authorized return on equity to their Kansas customers.
Maintain charitable contributions and community involvement in the Kansas service territories of Westar Energy and KCP&L at levels equal to or greater than their respective 2015 levels for 5 years following the closing of the merger.
Commit that Westar Energy's and KCP&L's retail electric base rates will not increase as a result of the merger.
Allow Westar Energy and KCP&L to recover a total of $30.9 million of merger transition costs consisting of $23.2 million for Westar Energy and $7.7 million for KCP&L's Kansas jurisdiction. Westar Energy and KCP&L have recorded these amounts as regulatory assets and they are being recovered over a ten-year period.
MPSC
In May 2018, the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri (MPSC), approved Great Plains Energy's, KCP&L's, GMO's and Westar Energy's joint application for approval of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)merger, including two stipulations and FERC; as well asagreements between these companies, MPSC staff and certain other customary conditions.

KCC Approval
In June 2016,intervenors in the case. Through the joint application and stipulations and agreements, Great Plains Energy, KCP&L, GMO and Westar filedEnergy agreed to the conditions and obligations listed below, in addition to other organizational, financing, customer service and civic responsibility commitments.
Provide a joint application with KCC for approvaltotal of the anticipated acquisition$29.1 million of Westar by Great Plains Energy. Under applicable Kansas regulations, KCC has 300one-time bill credits to Missouri electric retail customers within 120 days following the filing to rule on the transaction. In December 2016, KCC staff filed its testimony and recommended that the KCC not approve the anticipated acquisition, citing concerns with the sizeclose of the acquisition premium, the amount of anticipated cost synergies and potential impacts to the quality of service provided to Kansas customers. In January 2017, Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and Westar filed rebuttal testimony responding to KCC staff's concerns. An evidentiary hearing was held in the case from January 30, 2017 through February 7, 2017 and a final order on the joint application is expected by April 24, 2017.
MPSC Approval
On February 22, 2017, the MPSC issued an order directing Great Plains Energy to file an application with the MPSC for approvalmerger. Of this total, $14.9 million of the anticipated acquisition of Westar. The order requires Great Plains Energycredits relate to file the application within ten days from the date of the order. An evidentiary hearing in the case is expected to occur in early April 2017. While there is not a statutory deadline for an MPSC ruling on the merger application, the MPSC has indicated that they intend to work towards a ruling on a timeline that is consistent with the joint application filed by Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and Westar with KCC, where a final order is expected by April 24, 2017.

Prior to receiving the MPSC order to file an application for approval of the anticipated acquisition of Westar, Great Plains Energy had reached separate stipulations and agreements with the MPSC staffMissouri customers and the Officeremaining $14.2 million of the Public Counsel (OPC) in which the MPSC staffcredits relate to GMO customers.
Commit that KCP&L's and OPC agreed that they would not file complaints alleging that MPSC approval was necessary in order for Great Plains Energy to acquire Westar. The stipulations and agreements impose certain conditions on Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in the areas of financing, ratemaking, customer service, corporate social responsibility and also include other general provisions. The stipulation and agreement with the MPSC staff, among other things, provides thatGMO's retail electric base rates for KCP&L Missouri and GMO customers will not increase as a result of the acquisitionmerger.
Maintain charitable contributions and thatcommunity involvement in the event KCP&L's or GMO's credit ratings are downgraded below investment grade as a resultMissouri service territories of the acquisition, KCP&L and GMO will be restricted from payingat levels equal to or greater than their respective 2015 levels for 5 years following the closing of the merger.
Provide a dividendtotal of $3.0 million of support over 10 years to Great Plains Energy unless approved bycommunity agencies to promote low-income weatherization efforts.
Support the MPSC or until their credit ratings are restored to investment grade. The stipulationsrecovery of a total of $16.9 million of merger transition costs in KCP&L's and agreements must still be approved by the MPSCGMO's 2018 rate cases, consisting of $9.7 million for KCP&L's Missouri jurisdiction and it is expected that$7.2 million for GMO. KCP&L and GMO recorded these amounts as regulatory assets and they will be considered as part of Great Plains Energy's application for approval of the anticipated acquisition of Westar.

Other Approvals
In July 2016, Great Plains Energy and Westar filed applications with FERC and NRC for approval of the merger. In August 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) declared effectiverecovered over a registration statement including a joint proxy statement with Westar (the Proxy Statement Prospectus) used in connection with the Great Plains Energy and Westar special shareholder meetings that occurred in September 2016. In September 2016, shareholders of Great Plains Energy and Westar approved all proposals necessary for Great Plains Energy's acquisition of Westar at each company's respective shareholder meeting. In September 2016, Great Plains Energy and Westar filed their respective Pre-Merger Notification and Report forms with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act. In October 2016, the FTC granted Great Plains Energy's request for early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act with respect to the anticipated acquisition, and the DOJ also notified Great Plains Energy that it has closed its investigation of theten-year period.
Table of Contents


antitrust aspects of the anticipated acquisition. In January 2017, The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) consentedAccounting Charges and Deferrals Related to the Transfer of Control application filed by Great Plains Energy and Westar relating to the anticipated acquisition.  
Termination FeesMerger
The Merger Agreement provides that in connection with the terminationfollowing pre-tax reductions of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances relating to a failure to obtain required regulatory approvals prior to May 31, 2017 (which date may be extended to November 30, 2017 under certain circumstances (the End Date)), a finalrevenue, expenses and nonappealable order enjoiningdeferral were recognized following the consummation of the merger in connection with regulatory approvals or failure by Great Plains Energy to consummate the merger once all of the conditions have been satisfied, Great Plains Energy will be required to pay Westar a termination fee of $380 million. In addition,and are included in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated by (a) either party because the closing has not occurred by the End Date or (b) Westar,Evergy Companies' consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for 2018.
DescriptionIncome Statement Line ItemExpected Payment Period Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
    (millions)
One-time bill creditsOperating revenues2018 - 2019 $(59.7) $(23.1) $(22.4)
Annual bill creditsOperating revenues2019 - 2022 (10.5) (7.9) (2.6)
Total impact to operating revenues   $(70.2) $(31.0) $(25.0)
         
Charitable contributions and community supportOperating and maintenance2018 - 2027 $24.7
 $
 $
Voluntary severance and accelerated equity compensationOperating and maintenance2018 - 2019 47.9
 44.2
 2.6
Other transaction and transition costsOperating and maintenance2018 51.0
 21.5
 2.1
Reallocation and deferral of merger transition costsOperating and maintenancen/a (47.8) (13.8) (23.2)
Total impact to operating and maintenance expense   $75.8
 $51.9
 $(18.5)
Total   $(146.0) $(82.9) $(6.5)
Reductions of revenue related to customer bill credits and expenses related to charitable contributions and community support were incurred as a result of Great Plains Energy's uncured breachconditions in the MPSC and KCC merger orders and were recorded as liabilities in the amounts presented above following the consummation of the Merger Agreement,merger. Reductions of revenue for annual bill credits of $11.5 million for Westar Energy's and prior to such termination, an acquisition proposal for Great Plains Energy is publicly disclosed or made to Great Plains Energy, if Great Plains Energy enters into an agreement or consummates a transaction with respect to an acquisition proposal within twelve months following such termination, then Great Plains Energy may be required to pay Westar a termination fee of $180 million. Similarly,KCP&L's Kansas electric retail customers are recognized ratably in the event thattwelve month period preceding their payment.
Voluntary severance and accelerated equity compensation represent costs related to payments for voluntary severance and change in control plans, as well as the Merger Agreement is terminated by (x) either party becauserecording of unrecognized equity compensation costs and the closing has not occurred byincremental fair value associated with the End Date or (y) Great Plainsvesting of outstanding Westar Energy asequity compensation awards.
Other transaction and transition costs include merger success fees and fees for other outside services incurred.
Reallocation and deferral of merger transition costs represents the net reallocation of incurred merger transition costs between Evergy, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO and the subsequent deferral of these transition costs to a result of Westar's uncured breach ofregulatory asset for future recovery in accordance with the Merger Agreement,KCC and prior to such termination, an acquisition proposal for Westar is publicly disclosed or made to Westar, if Westar enters into an agreement or consummates a transaction with respect to an acquisition proposal within twelve months following such termination, then Westar may be required to pay Great Plains Energy a termination fee of $280 million.
3. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Great Plains Energy Other Operating Activities  
Year Ended December 312016 2015 2014
Cash flows affected by changes in:(millions)
Receivables$(18.3) $12.5
 $3.0
Accounts receivable pledged as collateral2.6
 (4.0) 4.0
Fuel inventories9.6
 (28.3) (13.7)
Materials and supplies(6.5) (3.0) (0.4)
Accounts payable(25.4) (11.4) 15.2
Accrued taxes8.1
 1.1
 8.3
Accrued interest6.1
 3.4
 (4.1)
Deferred refueling outage costs(3.1) (6.7) 17.0
Pension and post-retirement benefit obligations27.4
 18.5
 25.5
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(6.6) (4.8) (18.0)
Fuel recovery mechanisms(46.9) 47.5
 (28.5)
Solar rebates paid(4.5) (9.0) (43.2)
Other15.2
 (2.9) (12.3)
Total other operating activities$(42.3) $12.9
 $(47.2)
Cash paid during the period: 
  
  
Interest$191.2
 $182.2
 $174.8
Income taxes$0.1
 $0.1
 $
Non-cash investing activities:   
  
Liabilities accrued for capital expenditures$32.4
 $35.7
 $57.4
MPSC merger orders.
Table of Contents


Purchase Price
Based on an evaluation of the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, Westar Energy was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the merger. Pursuant to the Amended Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy's common stock shares were exchanged for Evergy common stock shares at the fixed exchange rate of 0.5981. The total consideration transferred in the merger is based on the closing stock price of Westar Energy on June 4, 2018 and is calculated as follows.
KCP&L Other Operating Activities  
Year Ended December 312016 2015 2014
Cash flows affected by changes in:(millions)
Receivables$(12.4) $2.6
 $(18.1)
Fuel inventories10.6
 (24.7) (8.5)
Materials and supplies(4.3) (4.5) (1.1)
Accounts payable(30.5) (18.0) 20.4
Accrued taxes67.9
 (19.0) (42.5)
Accrued interest
 3.4
 (0.1)
Deferred refueling outage costs(3.1) (6.7) 17.0
Pension and post-retirement benefit obligations28.6
 18.4
 26.9
Allowance for equity funds used during construction(6.6) (3.8) (16.0)
Fuel recovery mechanisms(53.7) 3.5
 (2.2)
Solar rebates paid(3.1) (7.2) (17.3)
Other4.5
 (5.5) (23.2)
Total other operating activities$(2.1) $(61.5) $(64.7)
Cash paid during the period: 
  
  
Interest$127.0
 $120.2
 $112.1
Income taxes$
 $
 $30.2
Non-cash investing activities:   
  
Liabilities accrued for capital expenditures$27.2
 $23.9
 $48.8
  (millions, except share amounts)
Great Plains Energy common stock shares outstanding as of June 4, 2018 215,800,074
Great Plains Energy restricted stock awards outstanding as of June 4, 2018 (204,825)
Great Plains Energy shares to be converted to Evergy shares 215,595,249
Exchange ratio 0.5981
Evergy common stock shares issued to Great Plains Energy shareholders 128,947,518
Closing price of Westar Energy common stock as of June 4, 2018 $54.00
Fair value of Evergy shares issued to Great Plains Energy shareholders $6,963.2
Fair value of Great Plains Energy's equity compensation awards 12.5
Total purchase price $6,975.7
4. RECEIVABLES
Great Plains Energy's equity compensation awards, including performance shares and restricted stock, were replaced by equivalent Evergy equity compensation awards subject to substantially the same terms and conditions upon the closing of the merger. In accordance with the accounting guidance in ASC 805, a portion of the fair value of these awards is attributable to the purchase price as it represents consideration transferred in the merger.
Purchase Price Allocation
The fair value of Great Plains Energy's assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of June 4, 2018 was determined based on significant estimates and assumptions that are judgmental in nature. Third-party valuation specialists were engaged to assist in the valuation of these assets and liabilities. The fair values of Great Plains Energy's assets acquired and liabilities assumed utilized for the purchase price allocation are preliminary to the extent that additional information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date.
The significant assets and liabilities for which preliminary valuation amounts are reflected as of the filing of this combined Form 10-K include the fair value of acquired long-term debt, asset retirement obligations, pension and post-retirement plans, accumulated deferred income tax liabilities and certain other long-term assets and liabilities.
The majority of Great Plains Energy's operations are subject to the rate-setting authority of the MPSC, KCC and The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and are accounted for pursuant to GAAP, including the accounting guidance for regulated operations. The rate-setting and cost recovery provisions for Great Plains Energy's regulated operations provide revenue derived from costs including a return on investment of assets and liabilities included in rate base. Except for the significant assets and liabilities for which valuation adjustments were made as discussed above, the fair values of Great Plains Energy's tangible and intangible assets and liabilities subject to these rate-setting provisions approximate their carrying values and the assets and liabilities do not reflect any adjustments to these amounts other than for amounts not included in rate base. The difference between the fair value and pre-merger carrying amounts for Great Plains Energy's long-term debt, asset retirement obligations and pension and post-retirement plans that were related to regulated operations were recorded as a regulatory asset or liability. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recognized as goodwill as of the merger date.
Table of Contents


The preliminary purchase price allocation to Great Plains Energy's assets and liabilities as of June 4, 2018, is detailed in the following table.
  (millions)
Current assets $2,151.7
Property, plant and equipment, net 9,179.7
Goodwill 2,338.9
Other long-term assets, excluding goodwill 1,235.9
Total assets $14,906.2
Current liabilities 1,673.9
Long-term liabilities, excluding long-term debt 2,898.0
Long-term debt, net 3,358.6
Total liabilities $7,930.5
Total purchase price $6,975.7
Impact of Merger
The impact of Great Plains Energy's subsidiaries on Evergy's revenues in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for 2018 was an increase of $1,661.1 million. The impact of Great Plains Energy's subsidiaries on Evergy's net income attributable to Evergy in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for 2018 was an increase of $236.2 million.
Evergy has incurred total merger-related costs, including reductions of revenue for customer bill credits, of $148.0 million for 2018 and $11.9 million for 2017.
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information reflects the consolidated results of operations of Evergy as if the merger transactions had taken place on January 1, 2017. The unaudited pro forma information was calculated after applying Evergy's accounting policies and adjusting Great Plains Energy's results to reflect purchase accounting adjustments.
The unaudited pro forma financial information has been presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations that would have been achieved or the future consolidated results of operations of Evergy.
  2018 2017
 (millions, except per share amounts)
Operating revenues $5,334.6
 $5,279.2
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc. 714.3
 468.9
Basic earnings per common share $2.67
 $1.73
Diluted earnings per common share $2.67
 $1.73
Evergy, Westar Energy and Great Plains Energy incurred non-recurring costs and a gain directly related to the merger that have been excluded in the pro forma earnings presented above. On an after-tax basis, these non-recurring merger-related costs and gain incurred by Evergy, Westar Energy and Great Plains Energy included:
$74.7 million and $14.8 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, of certain after-tax merger-related transition and transaction costs;
$44.4 million in 2018 of after-tax reductions in operating revenues related to one-time customer bill credits;
$278.0 million of after-tax financing charges in 2017 related to Great Plains Energy's previously contemplated acquisition of Westar Energy; and
Table of Contents


$36.6 million and $7.3 million in 2018 and 2017, respectively, of after-tax mark-to-market gains on interest rate swaps for which cash settlement was contingent upon the consummation of the merger.
3. REVENUE
Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's revenues disaggregated by customer class are summarized in the following tables.
2018Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
Revenues(millions)
Residential$1,578.8
 $846.4
 $735.6
Commercial1,356.4
 702.8
 794.8
Industrial527.8
 396.4
 138.8
Other retail30.6
 20.0
 10.4
Total electric retail$3,493.6
 $1,965.6
 $1,679.6
Wholesale404.4
 346.1
 53.5
Transmission308.1
 288.9
 14.5
Industrial steam and other17.9
 6.0
 4.4
Total revenue from contracts with customers$4,224.0
 $2,606.6
 $1,752.0
Other51.9
 8.3
 71.1
Operating revenues$4,275.9
 $2,614.9
 $1,823.1
(a) KCP&L amounts are included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.

Retail Revenues
The Evergy Companies' retail revenues are generated by the regulated sale of electricity to their residential, commercial and industrial customers within their franchised service territories. The Evergy Companies recognize revenue on the sale of electricity to their customers over time as the service is provided in the amount they have a right to invoice. Retail customers are billed on a monthly basis at the tariff rates approved by the KCC and MPSC based on customer kWh usage.
Revenues recorded include electric services provided but not yet billed by the Evergy Companies. Unbilled revenues are recorded for kWh usage in the period following the customers' billing cycle to the end of the month. This estimate is based on net system kWh usage less actual billed kWhs. The Evergy Companies' estimated unbilled kWhs are allocated and priced by regulatory jurisdiction across the rate classes based on actual billing rates.
The Evergy Companies also collect sales taxes and franchise fees from customers concurrent with revenue-producing activities that are levied by state and local governments. These items are excluded from revenue, and thus not reflected on the statements of income and comprehensive income, for Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, KCP&L recorded sales taxes and franchise fees collected from its Missouri customers gross on KCP&L's statements of comprehensive income within operating revenues and taxes other than income taxes.
Wholesale Revenues
The Evergy Companies' wholesale revenues are generated by the sale of wholesale power and capacity in circumstances when the power that the Evergy Companies generate is not required for customers in their service territory. These sales primarily occur within the SPP Integrated Marketplace. The Evergy Companies also purchase power from the SPP Integrated Marketplace and record sale and purchase activity on a net basis in wholesale revenue or fuel and purchased power expense. In addition, the Evergy Companies sell wholesale power and capacity through bilateral contracts to other counterparties, such as electric cooperatives, municipalities and other electric utilities.
Table of Contents


For both wholesale sales to the SPP Integrated Marketplace and through bilateral contracts, the Evergy Companies recognize revenue on the sale of wholesale electricity to their customers over time as the service is provided in the amount they have a right to invoice.
Wholesale sales within the SPP Integrated Marketplace are billed weekly based on the fixed transaction price determined by the market at the time of the sale and the MWh quantity purchased. Wholesale sales from bilateral contracts are billed monthly based on the contractually determined transaction price and the kWh quantity purchased.
Transmission Revenues
The Evergy Companies' transmission revenues are generated by the use of their transmission networks by the SPP. To enable optimal use of the diverse generating resources in the SPP region, the Evergy Companies, as well as other transmission owners, allow the SPP to access and operate their transmission networks. As new transmission lines are constructed, they are included in the transmission network available to the SPP. In exchange for providing access, the SPP pays the Evergy Companies consideration determined by formula rates approved by FERC, which include the cost to construct and maintain the transmission lines and a return on investment. The price for access to the Evergy Companies' transmission networks are updated annually based on projected costs. Projections are updated to actual costs and the difference is included in subsequent year's prices.
The Evergy Companies have different treatment for their legacy transmission facilities within the SPP, which results in different levels of transmission revenue being received from the SPP. Westar Energy's transmission revenues from SPP include amounts that Westar Energy pays to the SPP on behalf of its retail electric customers for the use of Westar Energy's legacy transmission facilities. These transmission revenues are mostly offset by SPP network transmission cost expense that Westar Energy pays on behalf of its retail customers. KCP&L and GMO do not pay the SPP for their retail customers’ use of the KCP&L and GMO legacy transmission facilities and correspondingly, their transmission revenues also do not reflect the associated transmission revenue from the SPP.
The Evergy Companies recognize revenue on the sale of transmission service to their customers over time as the service is provided in the amount they have a right to invoice. Transmission service to the SPP is billed monthly based on a fixed transaction price determined by FERC formula transmission rates along with other SPP-specific charges and the MW quantity purchased.
Industrial Steam and Other Revenues
Evergy's industrial steam and other revenues are primarily generated by the regulated sale of industrial steam to GMO's steam customers. Evergy recognizes revenue on the sale of industrial steam to its customers over time as the service is provided in the amount that it has the right to invoice. Steam customers are billed on a monthly basis at the tariff rate approved by the MPSC based on customer MMBtu usage.
Optional Exemption
Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations on certain bilateral wholesale contracts with an original expected duration of greater than one year for which they recognize revenue in the amount they have the right to invoice.
Table of Contents


4. RECEIVABLES
The Evergy Companies' receivables are detailed in the following table.
December 31December 31
 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Great Plains Energy (millions) 
Evergy (millions) 
Customer accounts receivable - billed $26.2
 $3.4
  $16.7
 $165.4
 
Customer accounts receivable - unbilled 79.1
 71.6
  91.2
 76.6
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts - customer accounts receivable (4.0) (3.8) 
Other receivables 64.7
 76.5
  95.0
 55.4
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts (9.2) (6.7) 
Total $166.0
 $147.7
  $193.7
 $290.7
 
KCP&L  
  
 
Westar Energy   
Customer accounts receivable - billed $25.5
 $2.8
  $
 $165.4
 
Customer accounts receivable - unbilled 63.7
 58.8
  16.6
 76.6
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts - customer accounts receivable (1.8) (1.8) 
Other receivables 51.7
 69.4
  71.6
 55.4
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts (3.9) (6.7) 
Total $139.1
 $129.2
  $84.3
 $290.7
 
KCP&L (a)
  
  
 
Customer accounts receivable - billed $7.8
 $1.6
 
Customer accounts receivable - unbilled 42.9
 67.6
 
Other receivables 15.8
 39.3
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts (3.8) (2.2) 
Total $62.7
 $106.3
 
Great Plains(a) KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.

Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's other receivables at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, consisted primarily of receivables from partners in jointly ownedjointly-owned electric utility plants and wholesale sales receivables. As of December 31, 2018, other receivables for Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L included receivables from contracts with customers of $65.8 million, $55.9 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
The Evergy Companies recorded bad debt expense related to contracts with customers as summarized in the following table.
 2018 2017 2016
 (millions)
Evergy$20.2
 $10.3
 $11.4
Westar Energy8.5
 10.3
 11.4
KCP&L (a)
13.1
 7.6
 6.3
(a) KCP&L amounts are included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
Sale of Accounts Receivable
Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO
KCP&L and GMO sell all of their retail electric accounts receivable to their wholly owned subsidiaries, KCP&L Receivables Company and GMO Receivables Company, respectively, which in turn sell an undivided percentage ownership interest in thetheir retail electric and certain other accounts receivable to Victory Receivables Corporation, an independent outside investor. Each of KCP&L Receivables Company's and GMO Receivables Company's saleinvestors. These sales of the undivided percentage ownership interestinterests in accounts receivable to Victory Receivables Corporation isindependent outside investors are accounted for as a secured borrowingborrowings with accounts receivable pledged as collateral and a corresponding short-term collateralized note payable recognized on the balance sheets.  At December 31, 20162018 and 2015, Great Plains Energy's, Evergy's accounts receivable
Table of Contents


pledged as collateral and the corresponding short-term collateralized note payable were $172.4 million and $175.0 million, respectively.$365.0 million. At December 31, 20162018, Westar Energy's accounts receivable pledged as collateral and 2015,the corresponding short-term collateralized note payable were $185.0 million. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, KCP&L's accounts receivable pledged as collateral and the corresponding short-term collateralized note payable were $110.0$130.0 million. KCP&L's agreement
Table of Contents


Westar Energy's receivable sale facility expires in September 20172019 and allows for $110$185.0 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount of borrowings from mid-December through mid-January, $125.0 million from mid January through mid-February, $185.0 million from mid-February to mid-July and then $200.0 million from mid-July through the expiration date of the facility. KCP&L's receivable sale facility expires in September 2019 and allows for $130.0 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount of borrowings at any time. GMO's agreementreceivable sale facility expires in September 20172019 and allows for $65$50.0 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount of borrowings from mid-November through mid-June and then increases to $80$65.0 million from mid-June through mid-November.the expiration date of the facility.
5. NUCLEAR PLANTRATE MATTERS AND REGULATION
KCP&L owns 47% of Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek), its only nuclear generating unit.  Wolf Creek is located in Coffey County, Kansas, just northeast of Burlington, Kansas.  Wolf Creek's operating license expires in 2045.  Wolf Creek is regulated by the NRC with respect to licensing, operations and safety-related requirements.KCC Proceedings
Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste
Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the Department ofWestar Energy (DOE) is responsible for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel.  Wolf Creek historically paid the DOE a quarterly fee of one-tenth of a cent for each kWh of net nuclear generation delivered and sold for the future disposal of spent nuclear fuel. In May 2014, this fee was set to zero.

2018 Transmission Delivery Charge
In 2010,March 2018, the DOEKCC issued an order adjusting Westar Energy's retail prices to include updated transmission costs as reflected in the FERC transmission formula rate (TFR). The new prices were effective in April 2018 and are expected to increase Westar Energy's annual retail revenues by $31.5 million.
In August 2018, Westar Energy filed a motionan updated Transmission Delivery Charge (TDC) tariff with the NRCKCC to withdraw its then pending application toreflect the NRC to constructreduction in revenue requirement that occurred as a national repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.  An NRC board denied the DOE's motion to withdraw its application. In 2011, the NRC announced that it was evenly divided on whether to take affirmative action to overturn or uphold the board's decision and ordered the licensing board, consistent with budgetary limitations, to close out its work on the DOE's application.  In August 2013, a federal court of appeals ruled that the NRC must resume its reviewresult of the DOE's application toTax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The updated filing requested new prices decreasing Westar Energy's annual retail revenues by approximately $20 million. In October 2018, the extent of appropriated funds. WithKCC issued an order approving the available funds,request with the NRC was able to complete its technical review of the Yucca Mountain application but was not able to resume the licensing hearing. new prices effective October 30, 2018.

Wolf Creek is currently evaluating alternatives for expanding its existing on-site spent nuclear fuel storage to provide additional capacity prior to 2025. Management cannot predict when, or if, an off-site storage site or alternative disposal site will be available to receive Wolf Creek's spent nuclear fuel and will continue to monitor this activity.  
Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Wolf Creek disposes of most of its low-level radioactive waste (Class A waste) at an existing third-party repository in Utah.  Management expects that the site located in Utah will remain available to Wolf Creek for disposal of its Class A waste.  Wolf Creek has contracted with a waste processor that will process, take title and dispose in another state most of the remainder of Wolf Creek's low-level radioactive waste (Classes B and C waste, which is higher in radioactivity but much lower in volume).  Should on-site waste storage be needed in the future, Wolf Creek has current storage capacity on site for about four years' generation of Classes B and C waste and believes it will be able to expand that storage capacity as needed if it becomes necessary to do so.
Table of Contents


Nuclear Plant Decommissioning Costs
The MPSC and KCC require KCP&L and the other owners of Wolf Creek to submit an updated decommissioning cost study every three years and to propose funding levels. The most recent study was submitted to the MPSC and KCC in August 2014 and is the basis for the current cost of decommissioning estimates in the following table. Funding levels included in KCP&L retail rates have not changed.
  KCC MPSC
 (millions)
Current cost of decommissioning (in 2014 dollars)    
Total Station $765.1
 $765.1
KCP&L's 47% Share 359.6
 359.6
     
Future cost of decommissioning (in 2045-2053 dollars) (a)
    
Total Station $2,201.5
 $2,253.1
KCP&L's 47% Share 1,034.7
 1,059.0
     
Annual escalation factor 3.15% 3.22%
Annual return on trust assets (b)
 6.29% 5.81%
(a) Total future cost over an eight year decommissioning period
(b) The 6.29% and 5.81% rate of return for KCC and MPSC, respectively, is through 2025. The rates then systematically decrease through 2053 to 0.72% and 2.22% for KCC and MPSC, respectively, based on the assumption that the fund's investment mix will become increasingly conservative as the decommissioning period approaches.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund
In 2016 and 2015, KCP&L contributed approximately $3.3 million to a tax-qualified trust fund to be used to decommission Wolf Creek. Amounts funded are charged to other operating expense and recovered in customers' rates. The funding level assumes a projected level of return on trust assets. If the actual return on trust assets is below the projected level or actual decommissioning costs are higher than estimated, KCP&L could be responsible for the balance of funds required; however, while there can be no assurances, management believes a rate increase would be allowed to recover decommissioning costs over the remaining life of the unit.
The following table summarizes the change in Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's nuclear decommissioning trust fund.
 2016 2015
Decommissioning Trust (millions) 
Beginning balance January 1 $200.7
   $199.0
 
Contributions 3.3
   3.3
 
Earned income, net of fees 4.1
   3.4
 
Net realized gains 0.3
   0.7
 
Net unrealized gains (losses) 14.5
   (5.7) 
Ending balance December 31 $222.9
   $200.7
 
Table of Contents


The nuclear decommissioning trust is reported at fair value on the balance sheets and is invested in assets as detailed in the following table.
 December 31
 2016  2015 
 
Cost
Basis
 Unrealized Gains 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
Cost
Basis
  
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 (millions)
Equity securities$93.3
  $62.1
   $(1.5)   $153.9
   $89.6
   $47.9
   $(2.1)   $135.4
 
Debt securities63.4
  2.3
   (0.5)   65.2
   59.6
   2.6
   (0.5)   61.7
 
Other3.8
  
   
   3.8
   3.6
   
   
   3.6
 
Total$160.5
  $64.4
   $(2.0)   $222.9
   $152.8
   $50.5
   $(2.6)   $200.7
 
The weighted average maturity of debt securities held by the trust at December 31, 2016, was approximately 8 years.  The costs of securities sold are determined on the basis of specific identification.  The following table summarizes the realized gains and losses from the sale of securities in the nuclear decommissioning trust fund.
 2016 2015 2014
 (millions)
Realized gains$1.6
 $5.3
 $1.4
Realized losses(1.3) (4.6) (1.0)
Nuclear Insurance
The owners of Wolf Creek (Owners) maintain nuclear insurance for Wolf Creek for nuclear liability, nuclear property and accidental outage. These policies contain certain industry standard exclusions, including, but not limited to, ordinary wear and tear, and war. The nuclear property insurance programs subscribed to by members of the nuclear power generating industry include industry aggregate limits for acts of terrorism and related losses, including replacement power costs. There is no industry aggregate limit for liability claims related to terrorism, regardless of the number of acts of terrorism affecting Wolf Creek or any other nuclear energy liability policy or the number of policies in place. An industry aggregate limit of $3.2 billion plus any reinsurance recoverable by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), the Owners' insurance provider, exists for property claims related to nuclear acts of terrorism, including accidental outage power costs for nuclear acts of terrorism affecting Wolf Creek or any other nuclear energy facility property policy within twelve months from the date of the first act. An industry aggregate limit of $1.8 billion exists for property claims related to non-nuclear acts of terrorism. These limits plus any recoverable reinsurance are the maximum amount to be paid to members who sustain losses or damages from these types of terrorist acts. In addition, industry-wide retrospective assessment programs (discussed below) can apply once these insurance programs have been exhausted.
In the event of a catastrophic loss at Wolf Creek, the insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover property damage and extra expenses incurred. Uninsured losses, to the extent not recovered through rates, would be assumed by KCP&L and the other owners and could have a material effect on Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Nuclear Liability Insurance
Pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, which was reauthorized through December 31, 2025, by theWestar Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Owners are required to insure against public liability claims resulting from nuclear incidents to the full limit of public liability, which is currently $13.4 billion. This limit of liability consists of the maximum available commercial insurance of $0.4 billion and the remaining $13.0 billion is provided through an industry-wide retrospective assessment program mandated by law, known as the Secondary Financial Protection (SFP) program. Under the SFP program, the Owners can be assessed up to $127.3 million ($59.8 million, KCP&L's 47% share) per incident at any commercial reactor in the country, payable at no more than $19.0 million ($8.9 million, KCP&L's 47% share) per incident per year. This assessment is subject to an inflation adjustment based on the Consumer
Table of Contents


Price Index and applicable premium taxes. In addition, the U.S. Congress could impose additional revenue-raising measures to pay claims.
Nuclear Property Insurance
The Owners carry decontamination liability, premature decommissioning liability and property damage insurance from NEIL for Wolf Creek totaling approximately $2.8 billion ($1.3 billion, KCP&L's 47% share). In the event of an accident, insurance proceeds must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination in accordance with a plan mandated by the NRC. KCP&L's share of any remaining proceeds can be used for further decontamination, property damage restoration and premature decommissioning costs. Premature decommissioning coverage applies only if an accident at Wolf Creek exceeds $500 million in property damage and decontamination expenses, and only after trust funds have been exhausted.
Accidental Nuclear Outage Insurance
The Owners also carry additional insurance from NEIL to cover costs of replacement power and other extra expenses incurred in the event of a prolonged outage resulting from accidental property damage at Wolf Creek.
Under all NEIL policies, the Owners are subject to retrospective assessments if NEIL losses, for each policy year, exceed the accumulated funds available to the insurer under that policy. The estimated maximum amount of retrospective assessments under the current policies could total approximately $37.5 million ($17.6 million, KCP&L's 47% share) per policy year.
6. REGULATORY MATTERS
KCP&L Kansas 2016 Abbreviated2018 Rate Case Proceedings
In November 2016, KCP&LFebruary 2018, Westar Energy filed an abbreviated application with the KCC to request a two-step change in rates, a decrease to retail revenues of approximately $2 million in September 2018 followed by an increase in retail revenues of approximately $54 million in February 2019, with a return on equity of 9.85% and a rate-making equity ratio of 51.6%. The request reflects costs associated with the completion of the Western Plains Wind Farm, the expiration of wholesale contracts currently reflected in retail prices as offsets to retail cost of service, the expiration of production tax credits from prior wind investments and an updated depreciation study, partially offset by the impact of the TCJA and a portion of the savings from the merger with Great Plains Energy.
In July 2018, Westar Energy, the KCC staff and several other intervenors in the case reached a non-unanimous stipulation and agreement to settle all outstanding issues in the case. The stipulation and agreement provides for a decrease to retail revenues of $66.0 million, before rebasing property tax expense, with a return on equity of 9.3%, a rate-making equity ratio of 51.46% and does not include a second step revenue requirement change as included in Westar Energy's initial application. The stipulation and agreement also provides for an approximately $16 million increase associated with rebasing property tax expense, an approximately $46 million increase in depreciation expense, allows for the recovery of an approximately $41 million wholesale contract that expires in 2019 through Westar Energy's fuel recovery mechanism and reflects customer benefits related to the impacts of the TCJA, including a one-time bill credit of approximately $50 million, which was provided to customers following the conclusion of the rate case.
In September 2018, the KCC issued an order approving the non-unanimous stipulation and agreement. The rates established by the order took effect on September 27, 2018.
KCP&L 2018 Rate Case Proceedings
In May 2018, KCP&L filed an application with the KCC to request an increase to its retail revenues of $2.8$26.2 million reflecting the true-up to actuals of construction and environmental upgrade costs at the La Cygne station and Wolf Creek capital addition costs and the removal of certain regulatory asset and liability amortizations. The previously approvedbefore rebasing property tax expense, with a return on equity of 9.85% and a rate-making equity ratio forof 49.8%. The request reflects the impact of the TCJA and increases in infrastructure investment costs. KCP&L will not be addressed in this case. Testimony fromalso requested an additional $6.7 million increase associated with rebasing property tax expense.
Table of Contents


In October 2018, KCP&L, the KCC staff and other parties regardingintervenors reached a unanimous settlement agreement to settle all outstanding issues in the case is expected in April 2017, with an evidentiary hearing to occur in May 2017.case. The settlement agreement provides for a decrease to retail revenues is anticipatedof $3.9 million, a return on equity of 9.3%, a rate-making equity ratio of 49.09% and a one-time bill credit of $36.9 million for customer benefits related to be effective in July 2017.the impacts of the TCJA.

In December 2018, KCC issued an order approving the unanimous settlement agreement. The rates established by the order took effect on December 20, 2018.
MPSC Proceedings
KCP&L Missouri 20162018 Rate Case Proceedings
In July 2016,January 2018, KCP&L filed an application with the MPSC to request an increase to its retail revenues of $62.9$8.9 million before rebasing fuel and purchased power expense, with a return on equity of 9.9%9.85% and a rate-making equity ratio of 49.88%50.03%. The request reflects the impact of the TCJA and increases in infrastructure investment costs, transmission related costs for regional transmission lines,and property tax costs and costs to comply with environmental and cybersecurity mandates.costs. KCP&L also requested an additional $27.2$7.5 million increase associated with rebasing fuel and purchased power expense. In November 2016, MPSC staff filed testimony regarding the case stating that they did not have sufficient information to support a change in rates but in the event that new rates were approved, recommended a return on equity of 8.65%, which is on the upper end of their range of 7.9% to 8.75%.
In February 2017,September 2018, KCP&L, MPSC staff and other parties tointervenors in the case filed areached several non-unanimous stipulationstipulations and agreement resolving certainagreements to settle all outstanding issues in the case. The stipulationstipulations and agreement is pending MPSC approval. An evidentiary hearing also occurred in February 2017. An orderagreements provide for a decrease to retail revenues of $21.1 million and a one-time customer benefit of $38.7 million (on an annualized basis) related to the impact of the TCJA, which will be offset against existing KCP&L regulatory assets. The final amount of the one-time customer benefit related to the impact of the TCJA was $36.4 million, as its calculation was dependent on the remaining issues ineffective date of new rates.
In October 2018, the case is anticipated to be received to accommodate newMPSC issued an order approving the non-unanimous stipulations and agreements. The rates to be effective in May 2017.established by the order took effect on December 6, 2018.
GMO Missouri 20162018 Rate Case Proceedings
In February 2016,January 2018, GMO filed an application with the MPSC to request an increasea decrease to its retail revenues of $59.3$2.4 million before rebasing fuel and purchased power expense, with a return on equity of 9.9%9.85% and a rate-making equity ratio of 54.83%54.4%. The request included recoveryreflects the impact of increasedthe TCJA and increases in infrastructure investment costs and transmission related costs. GMO also requested a $21.7 million increase associated with rebasing fuel and property tax expenses as well as costs for infrastructure and system improvements to continue to provide reliable electric service.
Table of Contents


purchased power expense.
In September 2016,2018, GMO, the MPSC staff and certainother intervenors in the case reached several non-unanimous stipulations and agreements resolvingto settle all outstanding issues in the case. The stipulations and agreements provide for a decrease to retail revenues of $24.0 million and a one-time bill credit of $29.3 million (on an annualized basis) for customer benefits related to the impacts of the TCJA. The final amount of the one-time customer bill credit related to the impact of the TCJA was $27.4 million, as its calculation was dependent on the effective date of new rates.
In September 2016,October 2018, the MPSC issued an order for GMO approving the non-unanimous stipulations and agreements and authorizing an increase in annual revenues of $3.0 million and a return on equity of 9.5% to 9.75%.agreements. The rates established by the order took effect on February 22,December 6, 2018.
FERC Proceedings
In October of each year, Westar Energy posts an updated TFR that includes projected transmission capital expenditures and operating costs for the following year. This rate provides the basis for Westar Energy's annual request with the KCC to adjust retail prices to include updated transmission costs. In the most recent three years, the updated TFR was expected to adjust Westar Energy's annual transmission revenues by approximately:
$11.2 million decrease effective in January 2019;
$2.3 million increase effective in January 2018 ($25.5 million increase offset by $23.2 million decrease from reduction in federal corporate income tax rate); and
$29.6 million increase effective in January 2017.
Table of Contents


Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Great Plains Energy and KCP&LThe Evergy Companies have recorded assets and liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets resulting from the effects of the ratemaking process, which would not otherwise be recorded if the Companiesthey were not regulated. Regulatory assets represent incurred costs that are probable of recovery from future revenues. Regulatory liabilities represent future reductions in revenues or refunds to customers.
Management regularly assesses whether regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of future recovery or refund by considering factors such as decisions by the MPSC, KCC or FERC in Westar Energy's, KCP&L's and GMO's rate case filings; decisions in other regulatory proceedings, including decisions related to other companies that establish precedent on matters applicable to the Evergy Companies; and changes in laws and regulations. If recovery or refund of regulatory assets or liabilities is not approved by regulators or is no longer deemed probable, these regulatory assets or liabilities are recognized in the current period results of operations. The Companies'Evergy Companies continued ability to meet the criteria for recording regulatory assets and liabilities may be affected in the future by restructuring and deregulation in the electric industry or changes in accounting rules. In the event that the criteria no longer applied to any or all of the Evergy Companies' operations, the related regulatory assets and liabilities would be written off unless an appropriate regulatory recovery mechanism were provided. Additionally, these factors could result in an impairment on utility plant assets.
Table of Contents


Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sThe Evergy Companies' regulatory assets and liabilities are detailed in the following table.
 December 31 December 31
 2016 2015 2018 2017
 KCP&L GMO Great Plains Energy KCP&L GMO Great Plains Energy Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
Regulatory Assets (millions) (millions)
Taxes recoverable through future rates $123.9
 $24.8
 $148.7
 $125.0
 $26.4
 $151.4
Loss on reacquired debt 10.0
(a) 
1.7
(a) 
11.7
 11.3
 2.2
 13.5
Pension and post-retirement costs $808.2
 $343.7
 $361.5
 $393.9
 $393.9
 $379.7
Debt reacquisition costs 113.5
 104.1
 8.2
 109.2
 109.2
 8.7
Debt fair value adjustment 134.5
 
 
 
 
 
Asset retirement obligations fair value
adjustment
 111.4
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation 58.0
 58.0
 
 60.6
 60.6
 
Cost of removal 28.6
 
 28.6
 12.9
 
 12.9
 102.4
 65.7
 36.7
 30.8
 30.8
 30.3
Asset retirement obligations 69.6
 24.9
 94.5
 57.9
 19.5
 77.4
 171.9
 49.5
 91.6
 42.7
 42.7
 94.3
Pension and post-retirement costs 367.9
(b) 
104.7
(b) 
472.6
 358.5
 98.9
 457.4
Deferred customer programs 45.9
(c) 
27.4
(d) 
73.3
 50.3
 20.8
 71.1
Fuel recovery mechanism 69.9
(e) 

 69.9
 16.3
 0.1
 16.4
Derivative instruments 
 
 
 0.5
 6.3
 6.8
Iatan No. 1 and common facilities depreciation and carrying costs 13.6
(f) 
5.0
(f) 
18.6
 14.1
 5.2
 19.3
Analog meter unrecovered investment 35.6
 35.6
 
 31.5
 31.5
 
Treasury yield hedges 23.7
 23.7
 
 24.8
 24.8
 
Iatan No. 1 and common facilities 7.4
 
 2.9
 
 
 12.9
Iatan No. 2 construction accounting costs 26.9
(g) 
16.1
(g) 
43.0
 28.7
 16.0
 44.7
 26.8
 
 13.5
 
 
 25.0
Kansas property tax surcharge 3.6
(e) 

 3.6
 6.8
 
 6.8
 33.1
 23.7
 9.4
 17.4
 17.4
 6.6
Disallowed plant costs 15.0
 15.0
 
 15.2
 15.2
 
La Cygne environmental costs 14.8
 12.2
 2.6
 13.3
 13.3
 2.7
Deferred customer programs 19.9
 7.0
 8.0
 8.1
 8.1
 40.9
Fuel recovery mechanisms 91.2
 7.1
 41.7
 20.7
 20.7
 61.7
Solar rebates 29.2
(e) 
41.6
(e) 
70.8
 33.6
 49.0
 82.6
 45.2
 
 13.9
 
 
 22.6
Transmission delivery charge 3.1
(e) 

 3.1
 1.7
 
 1.7
 0.8
 
 0.8
 
 
 3.2
La Cygne deferred depreciation 2.8
(h) 

 2.8
 2.9
 
 2.9
Other 6.8
(e) 

 6.8
 11.9
 2.3
 14.2
Wolf Creek outage 21.8
 10.9
 10.9
 7.0
 7.0
 6.8
Pension and other post-retirement benefit
non-service costs
 13.6
 5.2
 4.8
 
 
 
Retired generation facilities 159.9
 
 
 
 
 
Merger transition costs 47.0
 22.6
 17.3
 
 
 
Other regulatory assets 6.1
 13.5
 2.3
 9.7
 9.7
 3.3
Total $801.8
 $246.2
 $1,048.0
 $732.4
 $246.7
 $979.1
 2,061.8

797.5

626.1

784.9

784.9

698.7
Regulatory Liabilities            
Emission allowances $62.1
 $
 $62.1
 $66.1
 $
 $66.1
Asset retirement obligations 99.7
 
 99.7
 86.5
 
 86.5
Cost of removal 
 65.1
(i) 
65.1
 
 68.2
 68.2
Fuel recovery mechanism 
 11.6
 11.6
 
 5.0
 5.0
Pension and post-retirement costs 15.3
 7.4
 22.7
 4.8
 3.7
 8.5
Other 10.3
 38.4
 48.7
 7.2
 42.9
 50.1
Total $187.4
 $122.5
 $309.9
 $164.6
 $119.8
 $284.4
Less: current portion (303.9) (97.1) (130.9) (99.5) (99.5) (153.6)
Total noncurrent regulatory assets $1,757.9

$700.4

$495.2

$685.4

$685.4

$545.1
(a)Amortized overKCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
Table of Contents


  December 31
  2018 2017
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
Regulatory Liabilities (millions)
Taxes refundable through future rates $1,703.6
 $853.2
 $609.2
 $845.2
 $845.2
 $574.0
Deferred regulatory gain from sale
leaseback
 59.1
 59.1
 
 64.6
 64.6
 
Emission allowances 54.1
 
 54.1
 
 
 58.1
Nuclear decommissioning 188.2
 84.5
 103.7
 55.5
 55.5
 126.0
Pension and post-retirement costs 53.4
 28.3
 25.1
 48.4
 48.4
 12.0
Jurisdictional allowance for funds used
during construction
 30.3
 30.3
 
 31.7
 31.7
 
La Cygne leasehold dismantling costs 29.5
 29.5
 
 29.6
 29.6
 
Cost of removal 48.1
 
 
 
 
 
Kansas tax credits 16.5
 16.5
 
 16.8
 16.8
 
Purchase power agreement 8.8
 8.8
 
 8.8
 8.8
 
Merger customer credits 7.5
 
 7.5
 
 
 
Refund of tax reform benefits 70.9
 7.2
 36.3
 
 
 
Other regulatory liabilities 59.0
 3.9
 11.2
 5.0
 5.0
 9.1
Total 2,329.0
 1,121.3
 847.1
 1,105.6
 1,105.6
 779.2
Less: current portion (110.2) (19.5) (52.8) (11.6) (11.6) (8.3)
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities $2,218.8
 $1,101.8
 $794.3
 $1,094.0
 $1,094.0
 $770.9
(a)KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
The following summarizes the lifenature and period of recovery for each of the related new debt issuances orregulatory assets listed in the remaining lives of the old debt issuances if no new debt was issued.table above.
(b)Pension and post-retirement costs: Represents unrecognized gains and losses, prior service and transition costs that will be recognized in future net periodic pension and post-retirement costs, pension settlements amortized over various periods and financial and regulatory accounting method differences that will be eliminated over the life of the pension plans. Of these amounts, $360.7$764.5 million, $343.7 million and $65.1$353.6 million for Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L, and GMO, respectively, are not included in rate base and are amortized over various periods.
(c) Debt reacquisition costs: Includes costs incurred to reacquire and refinance debt. These costs are amortized over the term of the new debt or the remaining lives of the old debt issuances if no new debt was issued and are not included in rate base.
Debt fair value adjustment: $13.2Represents purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of KCP&L and GMO long-term debt at fair value in connection with the merger. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt and is not included in rate base.
Asset retirement obligations fair value adjustment: Represents purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of KCP&L and GMO AROs at fair value in connection with the merger. Amount is amortized over the life of the related plant and is not included in rate base.
Depreciation: Represents the difference between regulatory depreciation expense and depreciation expense recorded for financial reporting purposes. These assets are included in rate base and the difference is amortized over the life of the related plant.
Cost of removal: Represents amounts spent, but not yet collected, to dispose of plant assets. This asset will decrease as removal costs are collected in rates and is not included in rate base.
Asset retirement obligations: Represents amounts associated with AROs as discussed further in Note 6. These amounts are recovered over the life of the related plant and are not included in rate base.
Table of Contents


Analog meter unrecovered investment: Represents the deferral of unrecovered investment of retired analog meters. Of this amount, $27.3 million is not included in rate base for Evergy and Westar Energy and is being amortized over a five-year period.
Treasury yield hedges: Represents the effective portion of treasury yield hedge transactions. Amortization of this amount will be included in interest expense over the term of the related debt and is not included in rate base.
Iatan No. 1 and common facilities: Represents depreciation and carrying costs related to Iatan No. 1 and common facilities. These costs are included in rate base and amortized over various periods.
(d) Iatan No. 2 construction accounting costs: $15.4Represents the construction accounting costs related to Iatan No. 2. These costs are included in rate base and amortized through 2059.
Kansas property tax surcharge: Represents actual costs incurred for property taxes in excess of amounts collected in revenues. These costs are expected to be recovered over a one-year period and are not included in rate base.
Disallowed plant costs: The KCC originally disallowed certain costs related to the Wolf Creek plant. In 1987, the KCC revised its original conclusion and provided for recovery of an indirect disallowance with no return on investment. This regulatory asset represents the present value of the future expected revenues to be provided to recover these costs, net of the amounts amortized.
La Cygne environmental costs: Represents the deferral of depreciation and amortization expense and associated carrying charges related to the La Cygne Station environmental project. This amount will be amortized over the life of the related asset and is included in rate base.
Deferred customer programs: Represents costs related to various energy efficiency programs that have been accumulated and deferred for future recovery. Of these amounts, $4.7 million for Evergy and KCP&L are not included in rate base and are amortized over various periods.
(e) Fuel recovery mechanisms:Not Represents the actual cost of fuel consumed in producing electricity and the cost of purchased power in excess of the amounts collected from customers. This difference is expected to be recovered over a one-year period and is not included in rate base.
Solar rebates: Represents costs associated with solar rebates provided to retail electric customers. These amounts are not included in rate base and are amortized over various periods.through 2020.
(f) Transmission delivery charge: IncludedRepresents costs associated with the transmission delivery charge. The amounts are not included in rate base and are amortized through 2038.over a one-year period.
(g) Wolf Creek outage: IncludedRepresents deferred expenses associated with Wolf Creek's scheduled refueling and maintenance outages. These expenses are amortized during the period between planned outages and are not included in rate base.
Pension and other post-retirement benefit non-service costs: Represents the non-service component of pension and post-retirement net benefit costs that are capitalized as authorized by regulators. The amounts are included in rate base and amortized through 2058.are recovered over the life of the related asset.
(h) Retired generation facilities: IncludedRepresents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Merger transition costs: Represents recoverable transition costs related to the merger. The amounts are not included in rate base and amortizedare recovered from retail customers through 2040.2028.
(i) Other regulatory assets: Estimated cumulative net provisionIncludes various regulatory assets that individually are small in relation to the total regulatory asset balance. These amounts have various recovery periods and are not included in rate base.
The following summarizes the nature and period of amortization for each of the regulatory liabilities listed in the table above.
Taxes refundable through future removal costs.rates: Represents the obligation to return to customers income taxes recovered in earlier periods when corporate income tax rates were higher than current income tax rates. A large portion of this amount is related to depreciation and will be returned to customers over the life of the applicable property.
Table of Contents


7. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETSDeferred regulatory gain from sale leaseback: Represents the gain KGE recorded on the 1987 sale and leaseback of its 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2. The gain is amortized over the term of the lease.
Accounting rules require goodwillEmission allowances: Represents deferred gains related to the sale of emission allowances to be tested for impairment annually and when an event occurs indicatingreturned to customers.
Nuclear decommissioning: Represents the possibility that an impairment exists. The annual impairment test for the $169.0 million of GMO acquisition goodwill was conducted on September 1, 2016. The goodwill impairment test is a two step process. See Note 1 for additional information regarding the Company's plans to adopt ASU No. 2017-04 for its 2017 goodwill impairment test. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill, to identify potential impairment. If the carrying amount exceedsdifference between the fair value of the reporting unit,assets held in the second stepnuclear decommissioning trust and the amount recorded for the accumulated accretion and depreciation expense associated with the asset retirement obligation related to Wolf Creek.
Pension and post-retirement costs: Includes pension and post-retirement benefit obligations and expense recognized in setting prices in excess of actual pension and post-retirement expense.
Jurisdictional allowance for funds used during construction: Represents AFUDC that is accrued subsequent to the time the associated construction charges are included in prices and prior to the time the related assets are placed in service. The AFUDC is amortized to depreciation expense over the useful life of the testasset that is performed, consistingplaced in service.
La Cygne leasehold dismantling costs: Represents amounts collected but not yet spent on the contractual obligation to dismantle a portion of assignmentLa Cygne Unit 2. The obligation will be discharged as the unit is dismantled.
Cost of removal: Represents amount collected, but not yet spent, to dispose of plant assets. This liability will be discharged as removal costs are incurred.
Kansas tax credits: Represents Kansas tax credits on investment in utility plant. Amounts will be credited to customers subsequent to the realization of the reporting unit's fair value to its assets and liabilities to determine an implied fair valuecredits over the remaining lives of goodwill, which is comparedthe utility plant giving rise to the carryingtax credits.
Purchase power agreement: Represents the amount included in retail electric rates from customers in excess of goodwillcosts incurred under purchase power agreements. Amounts are amortized over a five-year period.
Merger customer credits: Represents one-time merger bill credits to determine the impairment loss, if any,KCP&L's Kansas electric retail customers. The credits are expected to be recognizedprovided to customers in the financial statements. Great Plains Energy's regulated electric utility operations are considered one reporting unit for assessmentfirst quarter of impairment, as they are included within the same operating segment and have similar economic characteristics. The determination2019.
Refund of fair valuetax reform benefits: Represents amounts collected from customers in 2018 related to federal income tax in excess of the reporting unit consisted of two valuation techniques: an income approach consisting oftax owed by the Evergy Companies as a discounted cash flow analysis and a market approach consisting of a determination of reporting unit invested capital using market multiples derived from the historical revenue, earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), net utility asset values and market prices of stock of peer companies. The resultsresult of the two techniques were evaluated and weightedlower federal income tax rate enacted by the TCJA. Amounts will be refunded to determine a point withincustomers in 2019.
Other regulatory liabilities: Includes various regulatory liabilities that individually are relatively small in relation to the range that management considered representative of fair value for the reporting unit. Fair value of the reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount, including goodwill; therefore, there was no impairment of goodwill.total regulatory liability balance. These amounts will be credited over various periods.
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's intangible assets are included in electric utility plant on the consolidated balance sheets and are detailed in the following table.
   December 31, 2016   December 31, 2015 
  Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization
Great Plains Energy (millions)
Computer software  $355.2
   $(219.1)   $333.0
   $(191.8) 
Asset improvements  28.8
   (6.7)   28.3
   (6.1) 
                 
KCP&L                
Computer software  $338.3
   $(203.1)   $315.5
   $(177.7) 
Asset improvements  13.6
   (1.8)   13.1
   (1.5) 
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's amortization expense related to intangible assets is detailed in the following table.
  2016 2015
  (millions)
Great Plains Energy $29.1
 $28.6
KCP&L 25.7
 24.7
The following table provides the estimated amortization expense related to Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's intangible assets for 2017 through 2021 for the intangible assets included in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2016.
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
  (millions)
Great Plains Energy $26.1
 $23.7
 $21.5
 $18.0
 $14.3
KCP&L 24.9
 23.2
 21.0
 17.6
 13.9
Table of Contents


8.6. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
AROs associated with tangible long-lived assets are legal obligations that exist under enacted laws, statutes and written or oral contracts, including obligations arising under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. These liabilities are recognized at estimated fair value as incurred with a corresponding amount capitalized as part of the cost of the related long-lived assets and depreciated over their useful lives. Accretion of the liabilities due to the passage of time is recorded to a regulatory asset and/or liability. Changes in the estimated fair values of the liabilities are recognized when known.
Westar Energy, KCP&L hasand GMO have AROs related to decommissioning Wolf Creek, site remediation of its Spearville Wind Energy Facilities, asbestos abatement removal of storage tanks and the closure and post-closure care of ponds and landfills containing coal combustion residuals (CCRs). GMO hasIn addition, Westar Energy and KCP&L have AROs related to asbestos abatement, removaldecommissioning Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek) and the retirement of storage tanks and closure and post-closurewind generation facilities.
Table of ponds and landfills containing CCRs. Contents
Additionally, certain wiring used in Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's generating stations include asbestos insulation, which would require special handling if disturbed. Due to the inability to reasonably estimate the quantities or the amount of disturbance that will be necessary during dismantlement at the end of the life of a plant, the fair value of this ARO cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Management will continue to monitor the obligation and will recognize a liability in the period in which sufficient information becomes available to reasonably estimate its fair value.
On April 17, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published new regulations to regulate the disposal of CCRs at electric generation facilities. The CCR rule represents legal obligations of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L as to the closure and post-closure of its ponds and landfills containing CCRs. In 2016, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L revised their AROs by $42.1 million and $40.1 million, respectively, due to an increase in cost estimates for the closure of ponds and landfills containing CCRs at KCP&L's electric generating facilities. As a result of the CCR rule being published, Great Plains Energy and KCP&L increased their AROs $69.5 million and $51.3 million, respectively, in the second quarter of 2015.
The following table summarizes the change in Great Plainsthe Evergy Companies' AROs.
  Evergy  Westar Energy  
KCP&L(a)
 
  2018  2017  2018  2017  2018  2017 
  (millions) 
Beginning balance $405.1
  $324.0
  $405.1
  $324.0
  $266.3
  $278.0
 
Liabilities assumed upon merger with Great Plains Energy 412.2
  
  
  
  
  
 
Liabilities incurred during the year 7.4
  13.5
  7.4
  13.5
  
  
 
Revision in timing and/or estimates (150.1)  66.8
  (138.7)  66.8
  (11.4)  0.3
 
Settlements (22.4)  (16.0)  (12.0)  (16.0)  (13.1)  (25.5) 
Accretion 34.9
  16.8
  19.3
  16.8
  19.2
  13.5
 
Ending balance $687.1
  $405.1
  $281.1
  $405.1
  $261.0
  $266.3
 
Less: current portion (49.8)  (25.1)  (17.1)  (25.1)  (29.2)  (34.9) 
Total noncurrent asset retirement obligation $637.3
  $380.0
  $264.0
  $380.0
  $231.8
  $231.4
 
(a) KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
See Note 2 for more information regarding KCP&L's and GMO's ARO liabilities that Evergy assumed as a result of the merger.
In 2018, Evergy and Westar Energy recorded a $127.0 million revision in estimate primarily related to Westar Energy's ARO to decommission its 47% ownership share of Wolf Creek.
Table of Contents


7. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following tables summarize the property, plant and equipment of Evergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L.
December 31, 2018 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
  (millions)
Electric plant in service $26,916.7
 $13,176.7
 $10,439.1
Electric plant acquisition adjustment 740.6
 740.6
 
Accumulated depreciation (9,694.1) (4,642.8) (4,022.4)
Plant in service 17,963.2
 9,274.5
 6,416.7
Construction work in progress 685.2
 376.7
 204.4
Nuclear fuel, net 133.1
 66.1
 67.0
Plant to be retired, net (b)
 1.0
 1.0
 
Net property, plant and equipment $18,782.5
 $9,718.3
 $6,688.1
    
 
December 31, 2017 Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L (a)
  (millions)
Electric plant in service $12,954.3
 $12,954.3
 $10,213.2
Electric plant acquisition adjustment 739.0
 739.0
 
Accumulated depreciation (4,651.7) (4,651.7) (4,070.3)
Plant in service 9,041.6
 9,041.6
 6,142.9
Construction work in progress 434.9
 434.9
 350.3
Nuclear fuel, net 71.4
 71.4
 72.4
Plant to be retired, net (b)
 5.9
 5.9
 
Net property, plant and equipment $9,553.8
 $9,553.8
 $6,565.6
(a) KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
(b) As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, represents the planned retirement of Westar Energy analog meters prior to the end of their remaining useful lives.
The following table summarizes the property, plant and equipment of VIEs for Evergy and Westar Energy.
   December 31 
  2018 2017
   (millions) 
Electric plant of VIEs  $392.1
   $392.1
 
Accumulated depreciation of VIEs  (222.9)   (215.8) 
Net property, plant and equipment of VIEs  $169.2
   $176.3
 
Depreciation Expense
The Evergy Companies' depreciation expense is detailed in the following table.
  2018 2017 2016
  (millions)
Evergy (a)
 $567.9
 $350.0
 $316.7
Westar Energy (a)
 371.3
 350.0
 316.7
KCP&L 235.3
 228.4
 215.4
(a)Approximately $7.1 million, $8.3 million and $9.5 million of depreciation expense in 2018, 2017 and 2016 , respectively, was attributable to property, plant and equipment of VIEs.
Table of Contents


8. JOINTLY-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANTS
Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's AROs.share of jointly-owned electric utility plants at December 31, 2018, are detailed in the following tables.
  Great Plains Energy  KCP&L 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
  (millions) 
Beginning balance $275.9
  $195.9
  $239.3
  $177.7
 
Additions 1.6
  54.5
  1.3
  34.6
 
Revision in timing and/or estimates 42.1
  20.5
  40.1
  22.2
 
Settlements (17.4)  (7.8)  (15.0)  (6.7) 
Accretion 13.8
  12.8
  12.3
  11.5
 
Ending balance $316.0
  $275.9
  $278.0
  $239.3
 
Evergy                            
  Wolf Creek Unit 
La Cygne Units (a)
 Iatan No. 1 Unit Iatan No. 2 Unit Iatan Common 
Jeffrey Energy Center(b)
 State Line
  (millions, except MW amounts)
Evergy's share  94%   100%   88%   73%   79%   100%   40% 
                             
Utility plant in service  $3,724.9
   $2,228.0
   $707.3
   $1,374.5
   $504.9
   $2,392.5
   $114.1
 
Accumulated depreciation  1,760.8
   737.1
   257.3
   426.7
   127.8
   861.0
   71.3
 
Nuclear fuel, net  133.1
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Construction work in progress  171.6
   41.8
   27.1
   30.5
   26.5
   33.2
   0.4
 
2019 accredited capacity-MWs  1,104
   1,398
   616
   641
   NA
   2,187
   196
 
(a)
The VIE consolidated by Evergy and Westar Energy holds its 50% leasehold interest in La Cygne Unit 2. This 50% leasehold interest in La Cygne Unit 2 is reflected in the information provided above. See Note 7 for additional information.
(b)
Evergy and Westar Energy's 8% leasehold interest in Jeffrey Energy Center is reflected in the information provided above.
ARO settlement activity in 2016 and 2015 primarily consists
Westar Energy                
  Wolf Creek Unit 
La Cygne Units (a)
  
Jeffrey Energy Center(b)
State
Line
  
(millions, except MW amounts)

Westar Energy's share  47%   50%   92%   40% 
                 
Utility plant in service  $1,833.7
   $1,033.5
   $2,189.6
   $114.1
 
Accumulated depreciation  825.3
   408.6
   778.6
   71.3
 
Nuclear fuel, net  66.1
   
   
   
 
Construction work in progress  83.7
   34.0
   30.6
   0.4
 
2019 accredited capacity-MWs  552
   699
   2,012
   196
 
(a)
The VIE consolidated by Evergy and Westar Energy holds its 50% leasehold interest in La Cygne Unit 2. This 50% leasehold interest in La Cygne Unit 2 is reflected in the information provided above. See Note 7 for additional information.
(b)
Evergy's and Westar Energy's 8% leasehold interest in Jeffrey Energy Center is reflected in the information provided above.
KCP&L                    
  Wolf Creek Unit La Cygne Units Iatan No. 1 Unit Iatan No. 2 Unit Iatan Common
  (millions, except MW amounts)
KCP&L's share  47%   50%   70%   55%   61% 
                     
Utility plant in service  $1,891.2
   $1,194.5
   $567.4
   $1,060.3
   $414.8
 
Accumulated depreciation  935.5
   328.5
   203.2
   378.4
   112.8
 
Nuclear fuel, net  67.0
   
   
   
   
 
Construction work in progress  87.9
   7.8
   3.3
   6.2
   15.0
 
2019 accredited capacity-MWs  552
   699
   490
   482
   NA
 

Table of Contents


Each owner must fund its own portion of the remediationplant's operating expenses and capital expenditures. The Evergy Companies' share of AROs fordirect expenses are included in the closure of pondsappropriate operating expense classifications in Evergy's, Westar Energy's and landfills containing CCRs at KCP&L and GMO.&L's consolidated financial statements.
9. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER EMPLOYEEPOST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Great PlainsEvergy and certain of its subsidiaries maintain, and Westar Energy maintainsand KCP&L participate in, qualified non-contributory defined benefit pension plans forcovering the majority of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's and GMO'semployees as well as certain non-qualified plans covering certain active and inactive employees, including officers, andretired officers. Evergy is also responsible for its 47%94% ownership share of Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation (WCNOC)Creek's defined benefit plans. plans, consisting of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's respective 47% ownership shares.
For the majority of employees, pension benefits under these plans reflect the employees' compensation, years of service and age at retirement. EffectiveHowever, for the plan covering Westar Energy's employees, the benefits for non-union employees hired between 2002 and the second quarter of 2018 and union employees hired beginning in 2014, Great Plains Energy's non-union2012 are derived from a cash balance account formula. The plan was closed to future employees. Great Plains Energynon-union employees in 2018. For the plans covering KCP&L's employees, the benefits for union employees hired beginning in 2014 are derived from a cash balance account formula and the plans were closed to future non-union employees in 2014.
Evergy and its subsidiaries also providesprovide certain post-retirement health care and life insurance benefits for substantially all retired employees of KCP&L, GMOWestar Energy and its 47% ownership share of WCNOC.
Table of Contents


KCP&L and GMOtheir respective shares of Wolf Creek's post-retirement benefit plans.
The Evergy Companies record pension and post-retirement expense in accordance with rate orders from the MPSCKCC and KCCMPSC that allow the difference between pension and post-retirement costs under GAAP and costs for ratemaking to be recognized as a regulatory asset or liability.  This difference between financial and regulatory accounting methods is due to timing and will be eliminated over the life of the plans.
In 2014, Great Plains Energy incurred pension settlement charges
Table of $8.5 million as a result of accelerated pension distributions.Contents


The following pension benefits tables provide information relating to the funded status of all defined benefit pension plans on an aggregate basis as well as the components of net periodic benefit costs. For financial reporting purposes, the market value of plan assets is the fair value. For regulatory reporting purposes, a five-year smoothing of assets is used to determine fair value. Net periodic benefit costs reflect total plan benefit costs prior to the effects of capitalization and sharing with joint owners of power plants. KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2016 2015 2016 2015
Change in projected benefit obligation (PBO) (millions)
PBO at January 1 $1,154.8
 $1,186.8
 $137.5
 $165.2
Service cost 42.0
 45.3
 2.6
 3.3
Interest cost 52.9
 50.3
 6.1
 6.8
Contribution by participants 
 
 5.3
 6.9
Amendments 
 
 (10.1) (7.1)
Actuarial (gain) loss 65.5
 (59.4) 0.6
 (23.6)
Benefits paid (70.6) (68.2) (11.9) (14.0)
PBO at December 31 $1,244.6
 $1,154.8
 $130.1
 $137.5
Change in plan assets        
Fair value of plan assets at January 1 $723.9
 $730.0
 $114.3
 $110.6
Actual return on plan assets 51.1
 (16.3) 2.6
 (0.1)
Contributions by employer and participants 69.8
 76.9
 10.2
 17.6
Benefits paid (68.0) (66.7) (11.5) (13.8)
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 $776.8
 $723.9
 $115.6
 $114.3
Funded status at December 31 $(467.8) $(430.9) $(14.5) $(23.2)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets        
Non-current asset $
 $
 $9.0
 $4.5
Current pension and other post-retirement liability (2.2) (2.6) (0.8) (0.8)
Noncurrent pension liability and other post-retirement liability (465.6) (428.3) (22.7) (26.9)
Net amount recognized before regulatory treatment (467.8) (430.9) (14.5) (23.2)
Accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability 476.9
 461.2
 (23.6) (9.4)
Net amount recognized at December 31 $9.1
 $30.3
 $(38.1) $(32.6)
Amounts in accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:        
Actuarial (gain) loss $242.5
 $230.7
 $(0.7) $(3.3)
Prior service cost 3.2
 3.9
 (8.0) 3.4
Other 231.2
 226.6
 (14.9) (9.5)
Net amount recognized at December 31 $476.9
 $461.2
 $(23.6) $(9.4)
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Change in projected benefit obligation (PBO) (millions)
PBO at January 1, 2018 $1,367.0
 $1,367.0
 $1,331.7
 $138.6
 $138.6
 $133.2
Service cost 60.7
 32.2
 48.6
 2.3
 1.3
 2.0
Interest cost 82.5
 50.7
 49.9
 8.0
 5.0
 4.8
Contribution by participants 
 
 
 5.6
 1.8
 6.6
Plan amendments 13.4
 11.4
 2.0
 
 
 
Actuarial (gain) loss (98.8) (100.1) (89.6) (11.3) (2.6) (18.0)
Benefits paid (137.9) (97.9) (70.2) (17.3) (10.5) (12.9)
Obligations assumed upon merger with Great Plains Energy 1,275.9
 
 
 123.4
 
 
Other (9.4) (4.4) 
 
 
 
PBO at December 31, 2018 $2,553.4
 $1,258.9
 $1,272.4
 $249.3
 $133.6
 $115.7
Change in plan assets            
Fair value of plan assets at January 1, 2018 $887.0
 $887.0
 $848.4
 $124.1
 $124.1
 $115.8
Actual return on plan assets (79.7) (30.9) (60.1) (7.5) (7.4) (1.2)
Contributions by employer and participants 114.5
 47.9
 80.3
 11.6
 3.2
 11.4
Benefits paid (134.0) (95.0) (69.8) (16.7) (10.2) (12.4)
Assets acquired upon merger with Great Plains Energy 825.0
 
 
 111.8
 
 
Other (9.4) (4.4) 
 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2018 $1,603.4
 $804.6
 $798.8
 $223.3
 $109.7
 $113.6
Funded status at December 31, 2018 $(950.0) $(454.3) $(473.6) $(26.0) $(23.9) $(2.1)
Table of Contents


  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  2016 2015 2014 2016 2015 2014
Components of net periodic benefit costs (millions)
Service cost $42.0
 $45.3
 $36.7
 $2.6
 $3.3
 $3.7
Interest cost 52.9
 50.3
 50.1
 6.1
 6.8
 7.9
Expected return on plan assets (49.2) (51.7) (50.2) (3.1) (2.9) (2.6)
Prior service cost 0.7
 0.8
 0.9
 1.2
 3.1
 3.1
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss 51.8
 51.4
 50.0
 (1.5) 0.2
 (0.1)
Transition obligation 
 
 
 
 0.2
 0.2
Settlement charges 
 
 8.5
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit costs before regulatory adjustment 98.2
 96.1
 96.0
 5.3
 10.7
 12.2
Regulatory adjustment (4.9) (9.8) (11.3) 6.0
 4.4
 4.3
Net periodic benefit costs 93.3
 86.3
 84.7
 11.3
 15.1
 16.5
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI or regulatory assets/liabilities            
Current year net (gain) loss 63.6
 8.6
 175.8
 1.1
 (20.6) (1.8)
Amortization of gain (loss) (51.8) (51.4) (50.0) 1.5
 (0.2) 0.1
Prior service cost 
 
 
 (10.2) (7.0) 
Amortization of prior service cost (0.7) (0.8) (0.9) (1.2) (3.1) (3.1)
Amortization of transition obligation 
 
 
 
 (0.2) (0.2)
Other regulatory activity 4.6
 4.3
 7.3
 (5.4) (4.4) (4.2)
Total recognized in OCI or regulatory asset/liability 15.7
 (39.3) 132.2
 (14.2) (35.5) (9.2)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and OCI or regulatory asset/liability $109.0
 $47.0
 $216.9
 $(2.9) $(20.4) $7.3
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets (millions)
Non-current asset $
 $
 $
 $17.5
 $
 $17.5
Current pension and other post-retirement liability (4.4) (2.6) (0.5) (1.7) (0.9) (0.8)
Noncurrent pension liability and other post-retirement liability (945.6) (451.7) (473.1) (41.8) (23.0) (18.8)
Net amount recognized before regulatory treatment (950.0) (454.3) (473.6) (26.0) (23.9) (2.1)
Accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability 419.9
 337.5
 362.4
 (6.0) 0.8
 (26.0)
Net amount recognized at December 31, 2018 $(530.1) $(116.8) $(111.2) $(32.0) $(23.1) $(28.1)
Amounts in accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:            
Actuarial (gain) loss $403.6
 $323.2
 $226.3
 $(7.8) $(1.0) $(11.0)
Prior service cost 16.3
 14.3
 3.8
 1.8
 1.8
 (8.1)
Other 
 
 132.3
 
 
 (6.9)
Net amount recognized at December 31, 2018 $419.9
 $337.5
 $362.4
 $(6.0) $0.8
 $(26.0)
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Change in projected benefit obligation (PBO) (millions)
PBO at January 1, 2017 $1,241.0
 $1,241.0
 $1,220.6
 $136.8
 $136.8
 $130.1
Service cost 28.7
 28.7
 44.2
 1.2
 1.2
 2.1
Interest cost 52.4
 52.4
 52.6
 5.5
 5.5
 5.4
Contribution by participants 
 
 
 1.5
 1.5
 6.0
Actuarial loss 107.0
 107.0
 134.9
 2.8
 2.8
 2.1
Benefits paid (62.1) (62.1) (34.7) (9.2) (9.2) (12.5)
Settlements and special termination benefits 
 
 (85.9) 
 
 
PBO at December 31, 2017 $1,367.0
 $1,367.0
 $1,331.7
 $138.6
 $138.6
 $133.2
Change in plan assets            
Fair value of plan assets at January 1, 2017 $797.2
 $797.2
 $776.8
 $115.6
 $115.6
 $115.6
Actual return on plan assets 113.1
 113.1
 114.8
 15.6
 15.6
 1.8
Contributions by employer and participants 36.3
 36.3
 76.9
 1.9
 1.9
 10.4
Benefits paid (59.6) (59.6) (34.5) (9.0) (9.0) (12.0)
Settlements 
 
 (85.6) 
 
 
Fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2017 $887.0
 $887.0
 $848.4
 $124.1
 $124.1
 $115.8
Funded status at December 31, 2017 $(480.0) $(480.0) $(483.3) $(14.5) $(14.5) $(17.4)
Table of Contents


  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets (millions)
Non-current asset $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $12.8
Current pension and other post-retirement liability (2.5) (2.5) (0.6) (0.8) (0.8) (0.8)
Noncurrent pension liability and other post-retirement liability (477.5) (477.5) (482.7) (13.7) (13.7) (29.4)
Net amount recognized before regulatory treatment (480.0) (480.0) (483.3) (14.5) (14.5) (17.4)
Accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability 372.6
 372.6
 379.7
 (11.1) (11.1) (12.2)
Net amount recognized at December 31, 2017 $(107.4) $(107.4) $(103.6) $(25.6) $(25.6) $(29.6)
Amounts in accumulated OCI or regulatory asset/liability not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost:            
Actuarial (gain) loss $369.0
 $369.0
 $245.5
 $(13.3) $(13.3) $2.8
Prior service cost 3.6
 3.6
 2.5
 2.2
 2.2
 (8.0)
Other 
 
 131.7
 
 
 (7.0)
Net amount recognized at December 31, 2017 $372.6
 $372.6
 $379.7
 $(11.1) $(11.1) $(12.2)

As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Evergy's pension benefits include non-qualified benefit obligations of $46.9 million and $27.4 million, respectively, which are funded by trusts containing assets of $43.8 million and $34.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Westar Energy's pension benefits include non-qualified benefit obligations of $24.8 million and $27.4 million, respectively, which are funded by trusts containing assets of $30.6 million and $34.3 million, respectively. The assets in the aforementioned trusts are not included in the table above. See Note 13 for more information on these amounts.
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Components of net periodic benefit costs (millions)
Service cost $60.7
 $32.2
 $48.6
 $2.3
 $1.3
 $2.0
Interest cost 82.5
 50.7
 49.9
 8.0
 5.0
 4.8
Expected return on plan assets (86.4) (55.9) (55.5) (8.8) (7.0) (2.8)
Prior service cost 0.7
 0.7
 0.7
 0.5
 0.5
 0.1
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss 32.6
 32.6
 45.1
 (0.6) (0.6) (0.2)
Net periodic benefit costs before regulatory adjustment and intercompany allocations 90.1
 60.3
 88.8
 1.4
 (0.8) 3.9
Regulatory adjustment 8.3
 8.8
 0.7
 (1.7) (2.0) (0.1)
Intercompany allocations n/a
 
 (21.6) n/a
 
 (1.1)
Net periodic benefit costs 98.4
 69.1
 67.9
 (0.3) (2.8) 2.7
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI or regulatory assets/liabilities            
Current year net (gain) loss 67.2
 (13.2) 25.9
 4.9
 11.7
 (14.0)
Amortization of gain (loss) (32.6) (32.6) (45.1) 0.6
 0.6
 0.2
Prior service cost 13.4
 11.4
 2.0
 
 
 
Amortization of prior service cost (0.7) (0.7) (0.7) (0.5) (0.5) (0.1)
Other regulatory activity 
 
 0.6
 
 
 
Total recognized in OCI or regulatory asset/liability 47.3
 (35.1) (17.3) 5.0
 11.8
 (13.9)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and OCI or regulatory asset/liability $145.7
 $34.0
 $50.6
 $4.7
 $9.0
 $(11.2)
Table of Contents


  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Components of net periodic benefit costs (millions)
Service cost $28.7
 $28.7
 $44.2
 $1.2
 $1.2
 $2.1
Interest cost 52.4
 52.4
 52.6
 5.5
 5.5
 5.4
Expected return on plan assets (53.6) (53.6) (51.2) (6.9) (6.9) (2.5)
Prior service cost 0.7
 0.7
 0.7
 0.5
 0.5
 
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss 26.9
 26.9
 49.0
 (0.8) (0.8) (0.5)
Settlement and special termination benefits 0.4
 0.4
 16.3
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit costs before regulatory adjustment and intercompany allocations 55.5
 55.5
 111.6
 (0.5) (0.5) 4.5
Regulatory adjustment 14.5
 14.5
 (9.2) (1.9) (1.9) 1.3
Intercompany allocations n/a
 
 (37.1) n/a
 
 (1.5)
Net periodic benefit costs 70.0
 70.0
 65.3
 (2.4) (2.4) 4.3
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI or regulatory assets/liabilities            
Current year net (gain) loss 47.1
 47.1
 71.3
 (5.8) (5.8) 3.0
Amortization of gain (loss) (26.9) (26.9) (64.9) 0.8
 0.8
 0.5
Amortization of prior service cost (0.7) (0.7) (0.7) (0.5) (0.5) 
Other regulatory activity 
 
 6.1
 
 
 
Total recognized in OCI or regulatory asset/liability 19.5
 19.5
 11.8
 (5.5) (5.5) 3.5
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and OCI or regulatory asset/liability $89.5
 $89.5
 $77.1
 $(7.9) $(7.9) $7.8
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Year Ended December 31, 2016 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Components of net periodic benefit costs (millions)
Service cost $25.3
 $25.3
 $42.0
 $1.2
 $1.2
 $2.6
Interest cost 53.4
 53.4
 52.9
 5.9
 5.9
 6.1
Expected return on plan assets (52.3) (52.3) (49.2) (6.9) (6.9) (3.0)
Prior service cost 0.8
 0.8
 0.7
 0.5
 0.5
 1.2
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss 24.9
 24.9
 51.8
 (1.1) (1.1) (1.5)
Net periodic benefit costs before regulatory adjustment and intercompany allocations 52.1
 52.1
 98.2
 (0.4) (0.4) 5.4
Regulatory adjustment 16.4
 16.4
 (3.1) (1.9) (1.9) 3.6
Intercompany allocations n/a
 
 (36.0) n/a
 
 (1.9)
Net periodic benefit costs 68.5
 68.5
 59.1
 (2.3) (2.3) 7.1
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI or regulatory assets/liabilities            
Current year net (gain) loss 62.8
 62.8
 63.6
 3.1
 3.1
 1.0
Amortization of gain (loss) (24.9) (24.9) (51.8) 1.1
 1.1
 1.5
Prior service cost (3.4) (3.4) 
 
 
 (10.1)
Amortization of prior service cost (0.8) (0.8) (0.7) (0.5) (0.5) (1.2)
Other regulatory activity 
 
 (2.9) 
 
 (1.9)
Total recognized in OCI or regulatory asset/liability 33.7
 33.7
 8.2
 3.7
 3.7
 (10.7)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit costs and OCI or regulatory asset/liability $102.2
 $102.2
 $67.3
 $1.4
 $1.4
 $(3.6)
Table of Contents


For financial reporting purposes, the estimated prior service cost and net actuarial (gain) loss for the defined benefit plans that will beare amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) or a regulatory asset into net periodic benefit cost. The Evergy Companies amortize prior service cost in 2017 are $0.7 millionon a straight-line basis over the average future service of the active employees (plan participants) benefiting under the plan at the time of the amendment. Evergy and $49.7 million, respectively. For financial reporting purposes,Westar Energy amortize the net actuarial gains and losses are recognized(gain) loss on a straight-line basis over the average future service of active plan participants benefiting under the plan without application of an amortization corridor. KCP&L amortizes the net actuarial (gain) loss on a rolling five-year average basis. For regulatory reporting purposes, net actuarial gains and losses are amortized over ten years. The estimated net gain for the other post-retirement benefit plans that willamounts to be amortized from accumulated OCI or a regulatory asset into net periodic benefit cost in 2017 is $0.5 million.2019 are detailed in the following table.
The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) for all defined benefit pension plans was $1,090.2 million and $1,017.6 million at December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
  Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
  (millions)
Actuarial (gain) loss amortization $27.5
 $25.4
 $48.3
 $(1.2) $(0.5) $(1.5)
Prior service cost amortization 1.9
 1.7
 0.9
 0.5
 0.5
 
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plans with the PBO, ABO or accumulated other post-retirement benefit obligation (APBO) in excess of the fair value of plan assets at year-end are detailed in the following table.tables. KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
December 31, 2018 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
 2016 2015 (millions)
ABO for all defined benefit pension plans $2,257.9
 $1,139.1
 $1,096.7
Pension plans with the PBO in excess of plan assets (millions)      
Projected benefit obligation $1,244.6
 $1,154.8
 $2,553.4
 $1,258.9
 $1,272.4
Fair value of plan assets 776.8
 723.9
 1,603.4
 804.6
 798.8
Pension plans with the ABO in excess of plan assets          
Accumulated benefit obligation $1,090.2
 $1,017.6
 $2,257.9
 $1,139.1
 $1,096.7
Fair value of plan assets 776.8
 723.9
 1,603.4
 804.6
 798.8
Other post-retirement benefit plans with the APBO in excess of plan assets          
Accumulated other post-retirement benefit obligation $61.7
 $108.5
 $249.3
 $133.6
 $57.7
Fair value of plan assets 38.3
 80.8
 223.3
 109.7
 38.2
December 31, 2017 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
  (millions)
ABO for all defined benefit pension plans $1,219.6
 $1,219.6
 $1,155.5
Pension plans with the PBO in excess of plan assets      
Projected benefit obligation $1,367.0
 $1,367.0
 $1,331.7
Fair value of plan assets 887.0
 887.0
 848.4
Pension plans with the ABO in excess of plan assets      
Accumulated benefit obligation $1,219.6
 $1,219.6
 $1,155.5
Fair value of plan assets 887.0
 887.0
 848.4
Other post-retirement benefit plans with the APBO in excess of plan assets      
Accumulated other post-retirement benefit obligation $138.6
 $138.6
 $111.6
Fair value of plan assets 124.1
 124.1
 81.5
Table of Contents


The GMO Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) is reflected as an unfunded ABO of $23.6 million. Great Plains Energy has approximately $15.8 million of assets in a non-qualified trust for this plan as of December 31, 2016, and expects to fund future benefit payments from these assets.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets represents Great Plains Energy'sthe Evergy Companies' estimate of the long-term return on plan assets and is based on historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the plans' investment portfolios. Assumed projected rates of return for each asset class were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns of various asset classes. Based on the target asset allocation for each asset class, the overall expected rate of return for the portfolios was developed and adjusted for the effect of projected benefits paid from plan assets and future plan contributions.
The following tables provide the weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net costs. KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31 Pension Benefits Other Benefits 
2016 2015 2016 2015 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2018 Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Discount rate 4.31% 4.54% 4.20% 4.47%  4.35% 4.35% 4.36% 4.33% 4.33% 4.33%
Rate of compensation increase 3.62% 3.62% 3.50% 3.50%  3.76% 4.03% 3.64% 3.50% n/a 3.50%
            
Weighted-average assumption used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2017 Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Discount rate 3.73% 3.73% 3.72% 3.67% 3.67% 3.64%
Rate of compensation increase 4.00% 4.00% 3.62% 4.00% 4.00% 3.50%
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net costs for years ended December 31 Pension Benefits Other Benefits 
2016 2015 2016 2015 
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net costs for the year ended December 31, 2018 Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Discount rate 4.54% 4.22% 4.47% 4.14%  3.73% 3.73% 3.72% 3.67% 3.73% 3.64%
Expected long-term return on plan assets 7.14% 7.14% 2.54%* 2.81%* 6.52% 6.67% 6.46% 6.00% 6.00% 2.80%
Rate of compensation increase 3.62% 3.62% 3.50% 3.50%  3.92% 4.00% 3.62% 3.50% n/a 3.50%
            
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net costs for the year ended December 31, 2017 Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Discount rate 4.25% 4.25% 4.31% 4.31% 4.31% 4.20%
Expected long-term return on plan assets 6.64% 6.64% 6.73% 6.00% 6.00% 2.00%
Rate of compensation increase 4.00% 4.00% 3.62% 4.00% 4.00% 3.50%
*after tax
Great Plains EnergyEvergy expects to contribute $79.6$115.5 million to the pension plans in 20172019 to meet ERISAEmployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) funding requirements and regulatory orders, the majority of which $37.0 million is expected to be paid by Westar Energy and $78.5 million is expected to be paid by KCP&L. Great Plains Energy'sThe Evergy Companies' funding policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet the ERISA funding requirements and MPSC and KCC rate orders plus additional amounts as considered appropriate; therefore, actual contributions may differ from expected contributions. Great Plains Energy alsoAlso in 2019, Evergy expects to contribute $4.6$2.8 million to otherthe post-retirement benefit plans, in 2017, the majority of which $0.7 million is expected to be paid by Westar Energy and $2.1 million is expected to be paid by KCP&L.
Table of Contents


The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid through 2026.2028.
 Pension Benefits Other BenefitsPension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
 (millions)Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
2017 $84.9
 $8.9
2018 81.0
 9.4
(millions)
2019 84.1
 10.0
$193.0
 $96.7
 $94.9
 $20.3
 $10.9
 $9.4
2020 85.9
 10.3
188.9
 94.9
 92.8
 19.8
 11.0
 8.9
2021 87.7
 10.7
189.4
 95.3
 92.8
 20.6
 11.3
 9.3
2022-2026 448.5
 58.7
2022187.4
 92.7
 93.4
 21.1
 11.5
 9.6
2023186.1
 90.0
 94.7
 21.5
 11.7
 9.8
2024-2028928.7
 432.7
 488.3
 110.7
 58.5
 52.1
Table of Contents


Pension plan assetsWestar Energy and KCP&L each maintain separate trusts for both their qualified pension and post-retirement benefits. These plans are managed in accordance with prudent investor guidelines contained in the ERISA requirements.
The investment strategy supports theprimary objective of the fund, whichWestar Energy pension plan is to provide a source of retirement income for its participants and beneficiaries, and the primary financial objective of the plan is to improve its funded status. The primary objective of the Westar Energy post-retirement benefit plan is growth in assets and the preservation of principal, while minimizing interim volatility, to meet anticipated claims of plan participants.
The primary objective of the KCP&L pension plans is to earn the highest possible return on plan assets within a reasonable and prudent level of risk. The portfolios are invested, and periodically rebalanced, to achieve targeted allocations of approximately 34% U.S. large cap and small cap equity securities, 21% international equity securities, 36% fixed income securities, 6% real estate, 1% commodities and 2% hedge funds. Fixed income securities include domestic and foreign corporate bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities, U.S. government agency, state and local obligations, U.S. Treasury notes and money market funds.
The fair values of Great Plains Energy's pension plan assets at December 31, 2016 and 2015, by asset category are in the following tables.
    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2016
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Assets measured at NAV
  (millions) 
Pension Plans                 
Equity securities                 
U.S. (a)
 $247.6
  $213.0
   $
   $
  $34.6
 
International (b)
 163.7
  120.4
   
   
  43.3
 
Real estate (c)
 42.7
  12.4
   
   
  30.3
 
Commodities (d)
 14.1
  
   
   
  14.1
 
Fixed income securities 
               
Fixed income funds (e)
 65.1
  20.9
   
   
  44.2
 
U.S. Treasury 52.2
  52.2
   
   
  
 
U.S. Agency, state and local obligations 17.9
  
   17.9
   
  
 
U.S. corporate bonds (f)
 120.2
  
   120.2
   
  
 
Foreign corporate bonds 9.3
  
   9.3
   
  
 
Hedge funds (g)
 15.6
  
   
   
  15.6
 
Cash equivalents 31.7
  31.7
   
   
  
 
Other (3.3)  
   (3.3)   
  
 
Total $776.8
  $450.6
   $144.1
   $
  $182.1
 
Table of Contents


    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2015
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Assets measured at NAV
Pension Plans (millions) 
Equity securities                 
U.S. (a)
 $226.0
  $195.5
   $
   $
  $30.5
 
International (b)
 147.4
  109.7
   
   
  37.7
 
Real estate (c)
 45.9
  12.2
   
   
  33.7
 
Commodities (d)
 5.8
  
   
   
  5.8
 
Fixed income securities 
               
Fixed income funds (e)
 60.4
  20.0
   
   
  40.4
 
U.S. Treasury 48.8
  48.8
   
   
  
 
U.S. Agency, state and local obligations 19.0
  
   19.0
   
  
 
U.S. corporate bonds (f)
 108.8
  
   108.8
   
  
 
Foreign corporate bonds 10.2
  
   10.2
   
  
 
Hedge funds (g)
 23.7
  
   
   
  23.7
 
Cash equivalents 26.0
  26.0
   
   
  
 
Other 1.9
  
   1.9
   
  
 
Total $723.9
  $412.2
   $139.9
   $
  $171.8
 
(a) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised of $128.8 million and $121.6 million, respectively, of traded mutual funds valued at daily listed prices and $84.2 million and $73.9 million, respectively, of traded common stocks and exchange traded funds. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category also includes $34.6 million and $30.5 million, respectively, of institutional common/collective trust funds valued at net asset value (NAV) per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
(b) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised of $92.8 million and $34.2 million, respectively, of traded mutual funds valued at daily listed prices and $27.6 million and $75.5 million, respectively, of traded American depository receipts, global depository receipts and ordinary shares. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category also includes $43.3 million and $37.7 million, respectively, of institutional common/collective trust funds valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
(c) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised of $12.4 million and $12.2 million, respectively, of traded real estate investment trusts. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category also includes $30.3 million and $33.7 million, respectively, of institutional common/collective trust funds and a limited partnership valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
(d) Consists of institutional common/collective trust funds valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
(e) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised of $20.9 million and $20.0 million, respectively, of traded mutual funds valued at daily listed prices. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category also includes $44.2 million and $40.4 million, respectively, of institutional common/collective trust funds valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
(f) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised of $115.7 million and $103.0 million, respectively, of corporate bonds, $2.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of collateralized mortgage obligations and $2.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, of other asset-backed securities.
(g) Consists of closely-held limited partnerships valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.

Other post-retirement plan assets are also managed in accordance with prudent investor guidelines contained in the ERISA requirements. The investment strategy supports theprimary objective of the funds, whichKCP&L post-retirement benefit plans is to preserve capital, maintain sufficient liquidity and earn a consistent rate of return. Other
The investment strategies of both the Westar Energy and KCP&L pension and post-retirement plans support the above objectives of the plans. The portfolios are invested, and periodically rebalanced, to achieve the targeted allocations detailed below. The following table provides the target asset allocations by asset class for the Westar Energy and KCP&L pension and other post-retirement plan assetsassets.
 Pension Benefits Post-Retirement Benefits
 Westar Energy KCP&L Westar Energy KCP&L
Domestic equities29% 32% 52% 3%
International equities20% 21% 13% %
Bonds36% 36% 35% 85%
Mortgage & asset backed securities% % % 4%
Real estate investments4% 6% % %
Other investments11% 5% % 8%
Fair Value Measurements
Evergy classifies recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements based on the fair value hierarchy as discussed in Note 13. The following are invested primarilydescriptions of the valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below.
Domestic equities - consist of individually held domestic equity securities and domestic equity mutual funds. Securities and funds, which are publicly quoted, are valued based on quoted prices in fixed income securities, which may include domesticactive markets and foreign corporate bonds, collateralized mortgage obligations and asset-backed securities, U.S. government agency, state and local obligations, U.S. Treasury notes and money market funds,are categorized as wellLevel 1. Funds that are traded in less than active markets or priced with models using highly observable inputs are categorized as domestic and international equity funds.Level 2. Funds that are valued by fund administrators using the net asset value
Table of Contents


(NAV) per fund share, derived from the quoted prices in active markets of the underlying securities are not classified within the fair value hierarchy.
International equities - consist of individually held international equity securities and international equity mutual funds. Securities and funds, which are publicly quoted, are valued based on quoted prices in active markets and are categorized as Level 1. Funds that are traded in less than active markets or priced with models using highly observable inputs are categorized as Level 2. Funds that are valued by fund administrators using the NAV per fund share, derived from the quoted prices in active markets of the underlying securities are not classified within the fair value hierarchy.
Bond funds - consist of funds maintained by investment companies that invest in various types of fixed income securities consistent with the funds' stated objectives. Funds that are traded in less than active markets or are priced with models using highly observable inputs are categorized as Level 2 and funds that are valued by fund administrators using the NAV per fund share, derived from the quoted prices in active markets of the underlying securities, are not classified within the fair value hierarchy.
Corporate bonds - consists of individually held, primarily domestic, corporate bonds that are traded in less than active markets or priced with models using highly observable inputs that are categorized as Level 2.
U.S. Treasury and agency bonds - consists of individually held U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. agency bonds. U.S. Treasury securities, which are publicly quoted, are valued based on quoted prices in active markets and are categorized as a Level 1. U.S. agency bonds, which are publicly quoted, are traded in less than active markets or priced with models using highly observable inputs and are categorized as Level 2.
Mortgage and asset backed securities - consists of individually held securities that are traded in less than active markets or valued with models using highly observable inputs that are categorized as Level 2.
Real estate investments - consists of traded real estate investment trusts valued at the closing price reported on the major market on which the trusts are traded and are categorized as Level 1 and institutional trust funds valued at NAV per fund share and are not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
Combination debt/equity/other fund - consists of a fund that invests in various types of debt, equity and other asset classes consistent with the fund's stated objectives. The fund, which is publicly quoted, is valued based on quoted prices in active markets and is categorized as Level 1.
Alternative investments - consists of investments in institutional trust and hedge funds that are valued by fund administrators using the NAV per fund share, derived from the underlying investments of the fund, and are not classified within the fair value hierarchy.
Short-term investments - consists of fund investments in high-quality, short-term, U.S. dollar-denominated instruments with an average maturity of 60 days that are valued at NAV per fund share and are not categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and cash equivalents - consists of investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased that are traded in active markets and are categorized as Level 1.

Table of Contents


The fair values of Great Plains Energy's other post-retirementthe Evergy Companies' pension plan assets at December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, by asset category are in the following tables.
    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2016
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Assets measured at NAV
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (millions) 
Equity securities $4.1
  $4.1
   $
   $
  $
 
Fixed income securities 
               
Fixed income fund(a)
 62.7
  
   
   
  62.7
 
U.S. Treasury 3.9
  3.9
   
   
  
 
U.S. Agency, state and local obligations 4.3
  
   4.3
   
  
 
U.S. corporate bonds(b)
 17.8
  
   17.8
   
  
 
Foreign corporate bonds 1.6
  
   1.6
   
  
 
Cash equivalents 19.5
  19.5
   
   
  
 
Other 1.7
  0.2
   1.5
   
  
 
Total $115.6
  $27.7
   $25.2
   $
  $62.7
 
    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2018
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets measured at NAV
  (millions)
Westar Energy Pension Plans                 
Domestic equities $215.0
  $144.7
   $
   $
   $70.3
International equities 138.7
  91.8
   
   
   46.9
Bond funds 296.4
  255.4
   
   
   41.0
Real estate investments 44.8
  
   
   
   44.8
Combination debt/equity/other fund 30.1
  30.1
   
   
   
Alternative investment funds 73.6
  
   
   
   73.6
Short-term investments 6.0
  
   
   
   6.0
Total $804.6
  $522.0
   $
   $
  
$282.6
                  
KCP&L Pension Plans                 
Domestic equities $238.1
  $198.6
   $
   $
   $39.5
International equities 150.9
  104.0
   
   
   46.9
Bond funds 67.4
  19.3
   
   
   48.1
Corporate bonds 123.6
  
   123.6
   
   
U.S. Treasury and agency bonds 69.9
  52.4
   17.5
   
   
Mortgage and asset backed securities 5.5
  
   5.5
   
   
Real estate investments 48.2
  12.6
   
   
   35.6
Combination debt/equity/other fund 13.5
  13.5
   
   
   
Alternative investment funds 31.6
  
   
   
   31.6
Cash and cash equivalents 49.8
  49.8
   
   
   
Other 0.3
  
   0.3
   
   
Total $798.8
  $450.2
   $146.9
   $
  
$201.7
Table of Contents


    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2015
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Assets measured at NAV
Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans (millions) 
Equity securities $3.2
  $3.2
   $
   $
  $
 
Fixed income securities 
               
Fixed income fund(a)
 68.9
  0.1
   
   
  68.8
 
U.S. Treasury 3.9
  3.9
   
   
  
 
U.S. Agency, state and local obligations 5.4
  
   5.4
   
  
 
U.S. corporate bonds(b)
 15.6
  
   15.6
   
  
 
Foreign corporate bonds 1.6
  
   1.6
   
  
 
Cash equivalents 14.0
  14.0
   
   
  
 
Other 1.7
  
   1.7
   
  
 
Total $114.3
  $21.2
  
$24.3
   $
  $68.8
 
    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets measured at NAV
  (millions) 
Westar Energy Pension Plans(a)
                  
Domestic equities $256.1
  $
   $232.2
   $
   $23.9
 
International equities 177.9
  
   177.9
   
   
 
Bond funds 299.5
  
   299.5
   
   
 
Real estate investments 41.8
  
   
   
   41.8
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 36.2
  
   36.2
   
   
 
Alternative investment funds 70.3
  
   17.0
   
   53.3
 
Short-term investments 5.2
  
   5.2
   
   
 
Total $887.0
  $
   $768.0
   $
   $119.0
 
                   
KCP&L Pension Plans                  
Domestic equities $263.9
  $220.5
   $
   $
   $43.4
 
International equities 176.0
  123.5
   
   
   52.5
 
Bond funds 71.8
  21.4
   
   
   50.4
 
Corporate bonds 125.8
  
   125.8
   
   
 
U.S. Treasury and agency bonds 69.8
  51.5
   18.3
   
   
 
Mortgage and asset backed securities 5.9
  
   5.9
   
   
 
Real estate investments 46.4
  13.6
   
   
   32.8
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 15.9
  15.9
   
   
   
 
Alternative investment funds 32.7
  
   
   
   32.7
 
Cash and cash equivalents 35.6
  35.6
   
   
   
 
Other 4.6
  
   4.6
   
   
 
Total $848.4
  $482.0
   $154.6
   $
   $211.8
 
(a)
In 2018, Evergy and Westar Energy re-evaluated the classification, within the fair value hierarchy, of their various fund investments within the Westar Energy Pension Plans. As a result, Evergy and Westar Energy determined that certain fund investments within the Westar Energy Pension Plans in the amount of $607.6 million as of December 31, 2017, should have been classified as Level 1, instead of Level 2. This determination is based on the fact that the fair value of these funds is based on daily published prices at which Evergy and Westar Energy are able to redeem their investments without restriction on a daily basis. Evergy and Westar Energy also determined that certain fund investments within the Westar Energy Pension Plans in the amount of $160.4 million as of December 31, 2017, should have been measured using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient, instead of as a Level 2 investment. This determination is based on the fact that these funds do not meet the definition of readily determinable fair value due to the absence of a published NAV. Evergy and Westar Energy have determined that these errors are immaterial to their current and previously filed financial reports and accordingly, have not revised prior periods but have reflected the changes in fair value hierarchy classification as of December 31, 2018.

(a) At
Table of Contents


The fair values of the Evergy Companies' post-retirement plan assets at December 31, 2015, this2018 and 2017, by asset category is comprised of $0.1 million of traded mutual funds valued at daily listed prices. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category also includes $62.7 million and $68.8 million, respectively, of an institutional common/collective trust fund valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) and is not categorizedare in the fair value hierarchy.following tables.
(b) At December 31, 2016 and 2015, this category is comprised
    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2018
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets measured at NAV
  (millions) 
Westar Energy Post-Retirement Benefit Plans 
                
Domestic equities $56.4
  $
   $
   $
   $56.4
 
International equities 14.0
  
   
   
   14.0
 
Bond funds 38.4
  
   
   
   38.4
 
Short-term investments 0.7
  
   
   
   0.7
 
Cash and cash equivalents 0.2
  0.2
   
   
   
 
Total $109.7
  $0.2
   $
   $
   $109.5
 
                   
KCP&L Post-Retirement Benefit Plans    

   

   

     
Domestic equities $2.5
  $2.5
   $
   $
   $
 
International equities 0.9
  0.9
   
   
   
 
Bond funds 75.0
  0.2
   
   
   74.8
 
Corporate bonds 17.4
  
   17.4
   
   
 
U.S. Treasury and agency bonds 10.3
  2.6
   7.7
   
   
 
Mortgage and asset backed securities 2.5
  
   2.5
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents 4.7
  4.7
   
   
   
 
Other 0.3
  
   0.3
   
   
 
Total $113.6
  $10.9
   $27.9
   $
   $74.8
 
Table of $14.0 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of corporate bonds, $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of collateralized mortgage obligations and $3.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of other asset-backed securities.Contents


    Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
Description
December 31
2017
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets measured at NAV
  (millions) 
Westar Energy Post-Retirement Benefit Plans(a)
                  
Domestic equities $65.2
  $
   $65.2
   $
   $
 
International equities 16.2
  
   16.2
   
   
 
Bond funds 42.1
  
   42.1
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents 0.6
  
   0.6
   
   
 
Total $124.1
  $
   $124.1
   $
   $
 
                   
KCP&L Post-Retirement Benefit Plans                  
Domestic equities $3.7
  $3.7
   $
   $
   $
 
Bond funds 56.6
  0.2
   
   
   56.4
 
Corporate bonds 16.7
  
   16.7
   
   
 
U.S. Treasury and agency bonds 8.5
  3.0
   5.5
   
   
 
Mortgage and asset backed securities 3.6
  
   3.6
   
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents 25.3
  25.3
   
   
   
 
Other 1.4
  
   1.4
   
   
 
Total $115.8
  $32.2
   $27.2
   $
   $56.4
 
(a)
In 2018, Evergy and Westar Energy re-evaluated the classification, within the fair value hierarchy, of their various fund investments within the Westar Energy Post-Retirement Benefit Plans. As a result, Evergy and Westar Energy determined that certain fund investments within the Westar Energy Post-Retirement Benefit Plans in the amount of $124.1 million as of December 31, 2017, should have been measured using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient, instead of as a Level 2 investment. This determination is based on the fact that these funds do not meet the definition of readily determinable fair value due to the absence of a published NAV. Evergy and Westar Energy have determined that this error is immaterial to their current and previously filed financial reports and accordingly, have not revised prior periods but have reflected the changes in fair value hierarchy classification as of December 31, 2018.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. The cost trend assumed for 2016 and 2017 was 6.8% and 6.5%, respectively, withassumptions are detailed in the rate declining through 2025 to the ultimate cost trend rate of 4.5%.following table.
Assumed annual health care cost growth rates as of December 31, 2018 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year 6.5% 6.5% 6.5%
Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend 2027
 2027
 2027
       
Assumed annual health care cost growth rates as of December 31, 2017 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year 6.0% 6.0% 6.8%
Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) 5.0% 5.0% 4.5%
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend 2020
 2020
 2027
Table of Contents


The effects of a one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates, holding all other assumptions constant, at December 31, 2016,2018, are detailed in the following table.
 Increase Decrease Evergy 
Westar Energy(a)
 KCP&L
 (millions)
Effect of 1% increase (millions)
Effect on total service and interest component $0.8
 $(0.7) $
 $
 $0.1
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation 1.0
 (0.8) 0.2
 (0.1) 
Effect of 1% decrease      
Effect on total service and interest component $
 $
 $0.3
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation (0.1) 0.1
 (0.2)
(a)Westar Energy includes only the effect of health care cost trend rates for Wolf Creek because the Westar Energy post-retirement benefit plan includes a fixed monthly stipend for health care and therefore is not affected by changes in health care costs.
Employee Savings Plans
Great Plains EnergyEvergy has defined contribution savings plans (401(k)) that cover substantially all employees. Great Plains EnergyEvergy matches employee contributions, subject to limits. The annual costcosts of the plans was approximately $11.5 millionare detailed in 2016, $10.6 millionthe following table. KCP&L amounts are only included in 2015 and $9.7 million in 2014. KCP&L's annual costconsolidated Evergy from the date of the plans was approximately $8.0 million in 2016, $7.9 million in 2015 and $7.1 million in 2014.closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
  2018 2017 2016
  (millions)
Evergy $16.3
 $9.7
 $9.6
Westar Energy 9.9
 9.7
 9.6
KCP&L 8.3
 7.7
 8.0
10. EQUITY COMPENSATION
Upon the consummation of the merger, Evergy assumed both Westar Energy's Long-Term Incentive and Share Award plan (LTISA) and Great Plains Energy's Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, is an equitywhich was renamed the Evergy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. All outstanding share-based payment awards under Westar Energy's LTISA vested at the closing of the merger transaction and were converted into a right to receive Evergy common stock with the exception of certain RSUs and deferred director share units issued prior to the closing of the merger to certain directors, officers and employees of Westar Energy. The vesting of these shares resulted in the recognition of $14.6 million of compensation plan approved byexpense in Evergy's and Westar Energy's consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for 2018.

All of Great Plains Energy's shareholders. The Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the grant ofoutstanding performance shares, restricted stock, restricted stock units, bonus shares, stock options, stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights, director shares,RSUs and director deferred share units and performance shares to directors, officers and other employees ofunder Great Plains Energy and KCP&L. The maximum number of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock that can be issued under the plan is 8.0 million. Common stock shares delivered by Great Plains Energy under theEnergy's Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan may be authorized but unissued, held in the treasury or purchased on the open market (including private purchases) in accordance with applicable securities laws. Great Plains Energy has a policy of delivering newly issuedwere converted into equivalent Evergy performance shares, or shares surrendered by Long-Term Incentive Plan participants for the withholding of taxes and held in treasury, or both, and does not expect to repurchase common shares during 2017 to satisfy performance share paymentsrestricted stock, RSUs and director deferred share unit conversion. Forfeiture rates are based on historical forfeitures and future expectations and are reevaluated annually.units at Great Plains Energy's merger exchange ratio of 0.5981. The estimated fair value of these converted awards that was allocated to the purchase price was $12.5 million, after-tax. See Note 2 for more information regarding the merger.
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sthe Evergy Companies' equity compensation expense and the associated income tax benefit.
201620152014 2018 2017 2016
Great Plains Energy(millions)
Evergy (millions)
Equity compensation expense $5.0
 $4.0
 $9.9
 $30.7
 $8.9
 $9.2
Income tax benefit 1.6
 1.4
 3.6
 1.4
 3.5
 3.7
KCP&L  
  
  
Westar Energy      
Equity compensation expense $3.2
 $2.6
 $6.9
 $24.8
 $8.9
 $9.2
Income tax benefit 1.0
 0.9
 2.4
 1.4
 3.5
 3.7
KCP&L(a)
      
Equity compensation expense $6.5
 $4.2
 $3.2
Income tax benefit 0.1
 1.6
 1.0
(a) KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018, through December 31, 2018.
Performance Shares
The paymentvesting of performance shares is contingent upon achievement of specific performance goals over a stated period of time as approved by the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee of the Evergy Board. The number of performance shares ultimately paidvested can vary from the number of shares initially granted depending on either Great Plains Energy's performance overprior to the closing of the merger transaction or Evergy's performance based on the stated performance periods.period of the awards. Compensation expense for performance shares is calculated by recognizing the portion of the grant date fair value for each reporting period for which the requisite service has been rendered. Dividends are accrued over the vesting period and paid in cash based on the number of performance shares ultimately paid.
The fair value of the converted Great Plains Energy performance share awards iswas estimated using the market value of the Company'sWestar Energy's and Great Plains Energy's common stock at the valuation date and a Monte Carlo simulation technique that incorporates assumptions for inputs of expected volatilities, dividend yield and risk-free rates. Expected volatility is based on daily stock price change based on historical common stock information during a historical period commensurate with the remaining term of the performance period of the grant. The risk-free rate is
Table of Contents


based upon the rate at the time of the evaluation for zero-coupon government bonds with a maturity consistent with the remaining performance period of the grant. The dividend yield is based on the most recent dividends paid by Westar Energy, as Evergy's stock price assumes Westar Energy's stock price on a forward basis, and the actual closinggrant date stock price on the valuation date. For the Great Plains Energy performance shares granted in 2016,converted into Evergy awards upon the closing of the merger, inputs for expected volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free rates were 18%16.6% - 18.5% , 3.61%2.96% and 0.94%1.8% - 2.6%, respectively.

Evergy and Westar Energy did not have any performance share awards issued and outstanding prior to the close of the merger.
Performance share activity for 2018 is summarized in the following table. Performance adjustment represents the number of shares of common stock related to performance shares ultimately issued that can vary from the number of performance shares initially granted depending on Great Plains Energy's performance over a stated period of time.
 
Performance
Shares
 
Grant Date
Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2016 609,010
   $25.60
 
Granted 225,204
   31.41
 
Earned (306,953)   24.22
 
Forfeited (1,714)   27.61
 
Performance adjustment 99,553
   24.16
 
Ending balance December 31, 2016 625,100
   28.13
 
 
Performance
Shares
 
Grant Date
Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2018 
   $
 
Converted Great Plains Energy awards upon merger 351,708
   63.79
 
Forfeited (3,212)   63.44
 
Ending balance December 31, 2018 348,496
   63.80
 
* weighted-average
At December 31, 2016,2018, the remaining weighted-average contractual term was 1.11.0 years.  The weighted-average grant-date fair value of shares granted in 2018 was $31.41, $24.03 and $28.78 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.$63.79. At December 31, 20162018, there was $6.46.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of forfeiture rates, related to converted Great Plains Energy performance
Table of Contents


shares granted under theits Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average contractual term.  The total fair value of performance shares earned and paid was $7.4 million, $0.5 million and $2.8 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock cannot be sold or otherwise transferred by the recipient prior to vesting and has a value equal to the fair market value of the shares on the issue date. Restricted stock shares vest over a stated period of time with accruing reinvested dividends subject to the same restrictions. Compensation expense, calculated by multiplying shares by the grant-date fair value related to restricted stock, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the stated vesting period. requisite service period of the award. Evergy and Westar Energy did not have any restricted stock awards issued and outstanding prior to the close of the merger.
Restricted stock activity for 2018 is summarized in the following table.
 
Nonvested
Restricted Stock
 
Grant Date
Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2016 231,508
   $24.78
 
Granted and issued 96,053
   29.41
 
Vested (77,317)   22.69
 
Forfeited (572)   27.51
 
  Ending balance December 31, 2016 249,672
   27.20
 
 
Nonvested
Restricted Stock
 
Grant Date
Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2018 
   $
 
Converted Great Plains Energy awards upon merger 122,505
   54.05
 
Vested (4,760)   54.50
 
Forfeited (1,070)   54.04
 
Ending balance December 31, 2018 116,675
   54.03
 
* weighted-average
At December 31, 20162018, the remaining weighted-average contractual term was 1.2 years.  The weighted-average grant-date fair value of shares granted in 2018 was $29.41, $25.89 and $25.70 in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.$54.05. At December 31, 20162018, there was $2.6 million of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of forfeiture rates, related to nonvestedconverted Great Plains Energy restricted stock granted under theits Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted-average contractual term. TotalThe total fair value of shares vested was $1.8 million, $2.2 million and $1.9$0.3 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.for 2018.
Director DeferredRestricted Share Units
Non-employee directorsEvergy and Westar Energy have historically used RSUs for their stock-based compensation awards. RSU awards are grants that entitle the holder to receive shares of Great Plains Energy's common stock as partthe awards vest. These RSU awards are defined as nonvested shares and do not include restrictions once the awards have vested. These RSUs have either taken the form of their annual retainer. Each director may elect to defer receiptRSUs with only service requirements that vest solely upon the passage of theirtime or RSUs with performance measures that vest upon expiration of the award term. All issued and outstanding Evergy and Westar Energy RSU awards with performance measures vested in connection with the closing of the merger transaction in June 2018.
Evergy measures the fair value of RSUs with only service requirements based on the fair market value of the underlying common stock as of the grant date. RSU awards with only service conditions recognize compensation expense by multiplying shares by receiving Director Deferred Share Unitsthe grant-date fair value related to the RSU and recognizing it on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award, including for those RSUs that converthave a graded vesting schedule. Nonforfeitable dividend equivalents, or the rights to sharesreceive cash equal to the value of Great Plains Energy'sdividends paid on Evergy's common stock, atare paid on certain of these RSUs during the end of January in the year after departure from the Board or suchvesting period. Nonforfeitable dividend equivalents are recorded directly to retained earnings.
Table of Contents


other time as elected by each director. Director Deferred Share Units have a value equal to the market value of Great Plains Energy's common stock on the grant dateRSU activity for awards with accruing dividends. Compensation expense, calculated by multiplying the director deferred share units by the related grant-date fair value, is recognized at the grant date. The total fair value of shares of Director Deferred Share Units issued was insignificantonly service requirements for 2016 and 2015. Director Deferred Share Units activity2018 is summarized in the following table.
  Share Units Grant Date Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2016  115,415
   $22.95
 
Issued  23,172
   28.99
 
Ending balance December 31, 2016  138,587
   23.96
 
 
Nonvested
Restricted Share Units
 
Grant Date
Fair Value*
Beginning balance January 1, 2018 255,964
   $46.09
 
Granted 222,465
   52.16
 
Converted Great Plains Energy awards upon merger 82,331
   53.77
 
Vested (342,599)   46.81
 
Forfeited (905)   50.73
 
Ending balance December 31, 2018 217,256
   54.07
 
* weighted-average
At December 31, 2018, the remaining weighted-average contractual term related to RSU awards with only service requirements was 1.4 years.  The weighted-average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted with only service requirements was $52.16, $53.25 and $46.35 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2018, there was $7.8 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs. The total fair value of RSUs with only service requirements that vested was $16.0 million, $6.1 million and $5.2 million in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Table of Contents


11. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS AND SHORT-TERM BANK LINES OF CREDIT
Great Plains Energy's $200 Million Revolving Credit Facility
Great Plains Energy's $200 million revolvingIn September 2018, Evergy entered into a $2.5 billion master credit facility, which expires in 2023. Evergy, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO have borrowing capacity under the master credit facility with a group of banks expiresspecific sublimits for each borrower. These sublimits can be unilaterally adjusted by Evergy for each borrower provided the sublimits remain within minimum and maximum sublimits as specified in October 2019.  The facility's terms permit transfers of unused commitments between this facility and the KCP&L and GMO facilities discussed below, with the total amount of the facility not exceeding $400 million at any one time.facility. A default by Great Plains Energyany borrower under the facility or anyone of itstheir significant subsidiaries on other indebtedness totaling more than $50.0$100.0 million isconstitutes a default under the facility. Under the terms of this facility, Great Plainseach of Evergy, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO is required to maintain a consolidatedtotal indebtedness to consolidatedtotal capitalization ratio, as defined in the facility, of not greater than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times. At As of December 31, 2016, Great Plains2018, Evergy, Westar Energy, was KCP&L and GMO were in compliance with this covenant.  In June 2016, the facility was amended, among other things, to increase the maximum consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1.00 to a level such that, if Great Plains Energy would not be in compliance with the covenant as of the date of the closing of the anticipated acquisition of Westar, the ratio would increase up to a maximum of 0.75 to 1.00 for one year. At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy had no outstanding cash borrowings and had issued $1.0 million in letters of credit under the credit facility.  At December 31, 2015, Great Plains Energy had $10.0 million of outstanding cash borrowings at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.94% and had issued $0.2 million letters of credit under the credit facility.
KCP&L's $600 Million Revolving Credit Facility and Commercial Paper
KCP&L's $600 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks provides support for its issuance of commercial paper and other general corporate purposes and expires in October 2019.  Great Plains Energy and KCP&L may transfer up to $200 million of unused commitments between Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's facilities.  A default by KCP&L on other indebtedness totaling more than $50.0 million is a default under the facility.  Under the terms of this facility, KCP&L is required to maintain a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capitalization ratio, as defined in the facility, not greater than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times.  At December 31, 2016, KCP&L was in compliance with this covenant.  At December 31, 2016, KCP&L had $132.9 million of commercial paper outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.98%, had issued letters of credit totaling $2.8 million and had no outstanding cash borrowings under the credit facility.  At December 31, 2015, KCP&L had $180.3 million of commercial paper outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.70%, had issued letters of credit totaling $2.7 million and had no outstanding cash borrowings under the credit facility.
GMO's $450 Million Revolving Credit Facility and Commercial Paper
GMO's $450 million revolving credit facility with a group of banks provides support for its issuance of commercial paper and other general corporate purposes and expires in October 2019.  Great Plains Energy and GMO may transfer up to $200 million of unused commitments between Great Plains Energy's and GMO's facilities.   A default by GMO or any of its significant subsidiaries on other indebtedness totaling more than $50.0 million is a default under the facility.  Under the terms of this facility, GMO is required to maintain a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capitalization ratio, as defined in the facility, not greater than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times.  At December 31, 2016, GMO was in compliance with this covenant.  At December 31, 2016, GMO had $201.9 million of commercial paper outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 1.02%, had issued letters of credit totaling
Table of Contents


$1.9 million and had no outstanding cash borrowings under the credit facility.  At December 31, 2015, GMO had $43.7 million of commercial paper outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.65%, had issued letters of credit totaling $2.5 million and had no outstanding cash borrowings under the credit facility.
Great Plains Energy's $5.1 Billion Term Loan Facility
In connection with the Merger Agreement,entry into the master credit facility, each of Evergy (as successor to Great Plains Energy), Westar Energy, entered into a commitment letter for a 364-day senior unsecured bridge term loan facility, originally for an aggregate principal amount of $8.017 billionKCP&L and GMO terminated its existing credit facilities in September 2018.
The following table summarizes the committed credit facilities (excluding receivable sale facilities discussed in Note 4) available to support the anticipated transaction and provide flexibility for the timing of long-term financing. The aggregate principal amount of the facility has been reduced most recently in connection with the October 2016 Great Plains Energy common stock and depositary share offerings. AsEvergy Companies as of December 31, 2016, the available aggregate principal amount2018 and 2017.
  Amounts Drawn   
 Credit FacilityCommercial PaperLetters of CreditCash BorrowingsAvailable Borrowings Weighted Average Interest Rate on Short-Term Borrowings
December 31, 2018(millions)  
Evergy, Inc.$450.0
n/a$1.0
$
$449.0
 —%
Westar Energy1,000.0
411.7
18.3

570.0
 3.08%
KCP&L600.0
176.9
2.7

420.4
 2.95%
GMO450.0
150.0
2.1

297.9
 3.00%
Evergy$2,500.0
$738.6
$24.1
$
$1,737.3
  
        
December 31, 2017       
Westar Energy(b)
$979.3
$275.7
$11.8
$
$691.8
 1.83%
KCP&L(a)
600.0
167.5
2.7

429.8
 1.95%
Evergy979.3
275.7
11.8

691.8
 1.83%
(a) KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of the facility was $5.1 billion.December 31, 2017.


(b) $20.7 million of Westar Energy's $730.0 million and $270.0 million revolving credit facilities expired in September 2017.
Table of Contents


12. LONG-TERM DEBT
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L'sThe Evergy Companies' long-term debt is detailed in the following table.tables.
    December 31
 Year Due 2016 2015
KCP&L   (millions)
General Mortgage Bonds        
2.47% EIRR bonds(a)
2017-2035  $110.5
   $110.5
7.15% Series 2009A (8.59% rate)(b)
2019  400.0
   400.0
Senior Notes    
    
5.85% Series (5.72% rate)(b)
2017  250.0
   250.0
6.375% Series (7.49% rate)(b)
2018  350.0
   350.0
3.15% Series2023  300.0
   300.0
3.65% Series2025  350.0
   350.0
6.05% Series (5.78% rate)(b)
2035  250.0
   250.0
5.30% Series2041  400.0
   400.0
EIRR Bonds        
0.694% Series 2007A and 2007B(c)
2035  146.5
   146.5
2.875% Series 20082038  23.4
   23.4
Current maturities   (281.0)   
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs   (15.4)   (17.3)
Total KCP&L excluding current maturities(d)
   2,284.0
   2,563.1
Other Great Plains Energy    
    
GMO First Mortgage Bonds 9.44% Series2017-2021  5.7
   6.8
GMO Senior Notes        
8.27% Series2021  80.9
   80.9
3.49% Series A2025  125.0
   125.0
4.06% Series B2033  75.0
   75.0
4.74% Series C2043  150.0
   150.0
GMO Medium Term Notes    
    
7.33% Series2023  3.0
   3.0
7.17% Series2023  7.0
   7.0
Great Plains Energy Senior Notes        
6.875% Series (7.33% rate)(b)
2017  100.0
   100.0
4.85% Series2021  350.0
   350.0
5.292% Series2022  287.5
   287.5
Current maturities   (101.1)   (1.1)
Unamortized discount and premium, net and debt issuance costs   (1.8)   (2.1)
Total Great Plains Energy excluding current maturities(d)
   $3,365.2
   $3,745.1
December 31, 2018Issuing Entity Year Due Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
Mortgage Bonds    (millions)
5.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2020 $250.0
 $250.0
 $
3.25% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2025 250.0
 250.0
 
2.55% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2026 350.0
 350.0
 
3.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2027 300.0
 300.0
 
4.125% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2042 550.0
 550.0
 
4.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2043 430.0
 430.0
 
4.625% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2043 250.0
 250.0
 
4.25% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2045 300.0
 300.0
 
6.70% SeriesKGE 2019 300.0
 300.0
 
6.15% SeriesKGE 2023 50.0
 50.0
 
6.53% SeriesKGE 2037 175.0
 175.0
 
6.64% SeriesKGE 2038 100.0
 100.0
 
4.30% SeriesKGE 2044 250.0
 250.0
 
2.95% EIRR bondsKCP&L 2023 79.5
 
 79.5
7.15% Series 2009A (8.59% rate)(a)
KCP&L 2019 400.0
 
 400.0
9.44% SeriesGMO 2019-2021 3.4
 
 
Pollution Control Bonds         
2.46% Series(b)
Westar Energy, Inc. 2032 45.0
 45.0
 
2.46% Series(b)
Westar Energy, Inc. 2032 30.5
 30.5
 
2.46% Series(b)
KGE 2027 21.9
 21.9
 
2.50% SeriesKGE 2031 50.0
 50.0
 
2.46% Series(b)
KGE 2032 14.5
 14.5
 
2.46% Series(b)
KGE 2032 10.0
 10.0
 
1.865% Series 2007A and 2007B(b)
KCP&L 2035 146.5
 
 146.5
2.75% Series 2008KCP&L 2038 23.4
 
 23.4
Senior Notes         
3.15% SeriesKCP&L 2023 300.0
 
 300.0
3.65% SeriesKCP&L 2025 350.0
 
 350.0
6.05% Series (5.78% rate)(a)
KCP&L 2035 250.0
 
 250.0
5.30% SeriesKCP&L 2041 400.0
 
 400.0
4.20% SeriesKCP&L 2047 300.0
 
 300.0
4.20% SeriesKCP&L 2048 300.0
 
 300.0
8.27% SeriesGMO 2021 80.9
 
 
3.49% Series AGMO 2025 36.0
 
 
4.06% Series BGMO 2033 60.0
 
 
4.74% Series CGMO 2043 150.0
 
 
4.85% Series
Evergy, Inc.(g)
 2021 350.0
 
 
5.292% Series
Evergy, Inc.(g)
 2022 287.5
 
 
Medium Term Notes     
    
7.33% SeriesGMO 2023 3.0
 
 
7.17% SeriesGMO 2023 7.0
 
 
Fair value adjustment(f)
    144.8
 
 
Current maturities (c)
    (705.4) (300.0) (400.0)
Unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs    (57.2) (37.1) (19.3)
Total excluding current maturities(d)
    $6,636.3
 $3,389.8
 $2,130.1
Table of Contents


December 31, 2017Issuing Entity Year Due Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(e)
Mortgage Bonds    (millions)
5.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2020 $250.0
 $250.0
 $
3.25% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2025 250.0
 250.0
 
2.55% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2026 350.0
 350.0
 
3.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2027 300.0
 300.0
 
4.125% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2042 550.0
 550.0
 
4.10% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2043 430.0
 430.0
 
4.625% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2043 250.0
 250.0
 
4.25% SeriesWestar Energy, Inc. 2045 300.0
 300.0
 
6.70% SeriesKGE 2019 300.0
 300.0
 
6.15% SeriesKGE 2023 50.0
 50.0
 
6.53% SeriesKGE 2037 175.0
 175.0
 
6.64% SeriesKGE 2038 100.0
 100.0
 
4.30% SeriesKGE 2044 250.0
 250.0
 
2.95% EIRR bondsKCP&L 2023 
 
 79.5
7.15% Series 2009A (8.59% rate)(a)
KCP&L 2019 
 
 400.0
Pollution Control Bonds         
1.92% Series(b)
Westar Energy, Inc. 2032 45.0
 45.0
 
1.94% Series(b)
Westar Energy, Inc. 2032 30.5
 30.5
 
2.00% Series(b)
KGE 2027 21.9
 21.9
 
2.50% SeriesKGE 2031 50.0
 50.0
 
2.00% Series(b)
KGE 2032 14.5
 14.5
 
2.00% Series(b)
KGE 2032 10.0
 10.0
 
1.329% Series 2007A and 2007B(b)
KCP&L 2035 
 
 146.5
2.875% Series 2008KCP&L 2038 
 
 23.4
Senior Notes         
6.375% Series (7.49% rate)(a)
KCP&L 2018 
 
 350.0
3.15% SeriesKCP&L 2023 
 
 300.0
3.65% SeriesKCP&L 2025 
 
 350.0
6.05% Series (5.78% rate)(a)
KCP&L 2035 
 
 250.0
5.30% SeriesKCP&L 2041 
 
 400.0
4.20% SeriesKCP&L 2047 
 
 300.0
Current maturities    
 
 (350.0)
Unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs    (39.3) (39.3) (17.2)
Total excluding current maturities(d)
    $3,687.6
 $3,687.6
 $2,232.2
(a)
Weighted-average interest rates at December 31, 2016
(b) 
Rate after amortizing gains/losses recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) on settlements of interest rate hedging instrumentsinstruments.
(b)
Variable rate.
(c) 
Variable rateEvergy's current maturities total as of December 31, 2018, includes $4.3 million of fair value adjustments recorded in connection with purchase accounting for the merger transaction.
(d) 
At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, does not include $50.0 million and $21.9 million of secured Series 2005 Environmental Improvement Revenue Refunding (EIRR) bonds because the bonds were repurchased in September 2015 and are held by KCP&L.
(e)
KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy at December 31, 2017.
(f)
Represents the fair value adjustments recorded at Evergy consolidated related to the long-term debt of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO in connection with purchase accounting for the merger transaction. This amount is not part of future principal payments and will amortize over the remaining life of the associated debt instruments.
(g)
Originally issued by Great Plains Energy but assumed by Evergy, Inc. as part of the merger transaction.
Table of Contents


AmortizationThe following table summarizes Evergy's and Westar Energy's long-term debt of Debt Expense
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's amortization of debt expense is detailed in the following table.VIEs.
  2016 2015 2014
  (millions)
KCP&L $3.2
 $3.0
 $3.0
Other Great Plains Energy 30.6
 1.1
 1.8
Total Great Plains Energy $33.8
 $4.1
 $4.8
In 2016, Other Great Plains Energy includes $29.6 million of amortization of debt expense related to Great Plains Energy's $5.1 billion bridge term loan facility. Fees related to this facility are being amortized over the 364 day term of the facility.
   December 31 
  2018 2017
   (millions) 
2.398% due 2021  $81.4
   $109.9
 
Current maturities  (30.3)   (28.5) 
Total excluding current maturities  $51.1
   $81.4
 

KCP&L General Mortgage Bonds
The Westar Energy and KGE mortgages each contain provisions restricting the amount of first mortgage bonds (FMBs) that could be issued by each entity. Westar Energy and KGE must be in compliance with such restrictions prior to the issuance of additional first mortgage bonds or other secured indebtedness. The amount of Westar Energy FMBs authorized by its Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated July 1, 1939, as supplemented, is subject to certain limitations as described below. The amount of KGE FMBs authorized by the KGE Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated April 1, 1940, as supplemented and amended, is limited to a maximum of $3.5 billion, unless amended further. FMBs are secured by utility assets. Amounts of additional FMBs that may be issued are subject to property, earnings and certain restrictive provisions, except in connection with certain refundings, of each mortgage. As of December 31, 2018, approximately $344.5 million principal amount of additional Westar Energy FMBs could be issued under the most restrictive provisions in Westar Energy's mortgage. As of December 31, 2018, KGE had sufficient capacity under the most restrictive provisions in the mortgage to meet its near term financing and refinancing needs.
KCP&L has issued mortgage bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated as of December 1, 1986, as supplemented, (Indenture). The Indenturewhich creates a mortgage lien on substantially all of KCP&L's utility plant. MortgageAdditional KCP&L mortgage bonds totaling $510.5 million were outstanding atmay be issued on the basis of property additions or retired bonds. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
2018, KCP&L Municipal Bond Insurance Policies
KCP&L's secured Series 2005 EIRR bonds totaling $50.0 million and $21.9 million, respectively, are covered by a municipal bond insurance policy between KCP&L and Syncora Guarantee, Inc. (Syncora). The insurance agreements between KCP&L and Syncora provide for reimbursement by KCP&L for any amounts that Syncora payshad sufficient capacity under the municipal bond insurance policies. The insurance agreements contain a covenant that the indebtedness to total capitalization ratio of KCP&L and its consolidated subsidiaries will not be greater than 0.68 to 1.00. At December 31, 2016, KCP&L was in compliance with this covenant. KCP&L is also restricted from issuing additional bonds under its General Mortgage Indenture if, after giving effect to such additional bonds, the proportion of secured debt to total indebtedness would be more than 75%, or more than 50% if the long term rating for such bonds by Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service would be at or below A- or A3, respectively. The insurance agreement covering the unsecured Series 2005 EIRR bonds also required KCP&L to provide collateral to Syncoramost restrictive provisions in the form of $50.0 million of Mortgage Bonds Series 2005 EIRR Insurer due 2035 for KCP&L's obligations under the insurance agreement as a result of KCP&L issuing general mortgage bonds in 2009 (other than refunding of outstanding general mortgage bonds) that resulted in the aggregate amount of outstanding general mortgage bonds exceeding 10% of total capitalization. The bonds are not incremental debt for KCP&L but collateralize Syncora's claim on KCP&L if Syncora was required to meet its obligation under the insurance agreement. In the event of a default under the insurance agreements, Syncora may take any available legal or equitable action against KCP&L, including seeking specific performance of the covenants.near term financing and refinancing needs.
GMO First Mortgage Bonds
GMO has issued mortgage bonds under the General Mortgage Indenture and Deed of Trust dated April 1, 1946, as supplemented. The Indenturesupplemented, which creates a mortgage lien on a portion of GMO's utility plant. Mortgage
Pollution Control Bonds
In July 2018, KCP&L remarketed its unsecured Series 2008 EIRR bonds maturing in 2038 totaling $5.7$23.4 million at a fixed rate of 2.75% through June 30, 2022.
In December 2018, KCP&L remarketed its unsecured Series 2007A and $6.82007B EIRR bonds maturing in 2035 totaling $146.5 million respectively, were outstanding at a variable rate that will be determined weekly.
In December 31, 20162018, Westar Energy, Inc. remarketed its Series 1994 pollution control bonds maturing in 2032 totaling $45.0 million and 2015.$30.5 million, collateralized by Westar Energy FMBs, at variable rates that will be determined weekly.
GMO In December 2018, KGE remarketed the following series of pollution control bonds, which are collateralized by KGE FMBs:
Series 1994 maturing in 2032 totaling $14.5 million and $10.0 million at variable rates that will be determined weekly; and
Series 1994B maturing in 2027 totaling $21.9 million at a variable rate that will be determined weekly.
Table of Contents


Senior Notes
Under the terms of the note purchase agreement for GMO's Series A, B and C Senior Notes, GMO is required to maintain a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated capitalization ratio, as defined in the agreement, not greater than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times.1.00. In addition, GMO's priority debt, as defined in the agreement, cannot exceed 15% of consolidated tangible net worth, as defined in the agreement. At December 31, 2016,2018, GMO was in compliance with these covenants.
TableIn March 2018, KCP&L issued, at a discount, $300.0 million of Contents4.20% unsecured Senior Notes, maturing in 2048. KCP&L also repaid its $350.0 million of 6.375% unsecured Senior Notes at maturity in March 2018.

As a result of the consummation of the merger transaction, a change in control provision in GMO's Series A, B and C Senior Notes was triggered that allowed holders a one-time option to elect for early repayment of their notes at par value, plus accrued interest. Several holders of GMO's Series A and B Senior Notes elected this option and in July 2018, GMO redeemed $89.0 million of its Series A Senior Notes and $15.0 million of its Series B Senior Notes.

Scheduled Maturities
Great PlainsEvergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's long-term debt maturities and the long-term debt maturities of VIEs for the next five years are detailed in the following table.
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
 (millions) (millions)
Great Plains Energy $382.1
 $351.1
 $401.1
 $1.1
 $432.0
Evergy(a)
 $701.1
 $251.1
 $432.0
 $287.5
 $439.5
Westar Energy(a)
 300.0
 250.0
 
 
 50.0
KCP&L 281.0
 350.0
 400.0
 
 
 400.0
 
 
 
 379.5
VIEs 30.3
 32.3
 18.8
 
 
(a)Excludes long-term debt maturities of VIEs.
13. COMMON STOCKFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Great Plains Energy has an effective shelf registration statementValues of Financial Instruments
GAAP establishes a hierarchical framework for disclosing the saletransparency of unlimited amountsthe inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. Management's assessment of securities with the SECsignificance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. In addition, the Evergy Companies measure certain investments that became effectivedo not have a readily determinable fair value at NAV, which are not included in March 2015the fair value hierarchy. Further explanation of these levels and expiresNAV is summarized below.
Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in March 2018. In September 2016, Great Plains Energy filed a post-effective amendment to its shelf registration statement to register depositary shares and preference stock among theactive markets for identical assets or liabilities. The types of securities that Great Plains Energy may offerassets and sell.liabilities included in Level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on public exchanges.
In September 2016, Great Plains Energy shareholders approved an amendment to Great Plains Energy's articles of incorporation, increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock, without par value, to 600 million shares from 250 million shares.
In October 2016, Great Plains Energy completed a registered public offering of 60.5 million shares of common stock, without par value, at a public offering price of $26.45 per share, for total gross proceeds of approximately $1.6 billion (net proceeds of approximately $1.55 billion after issuance costs). Great Plains Energy plans to use proceeds from the offering to finance a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.
Great Plains Energy has shares of common stock registered with the SEC for its Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan. The plan allows for the purchase of common shares by reinvesting dividends or making optional cash payments. Great Plains Energy can issue new shares or purchase shares on the open market for the plan. At December 31, 2016, 1.0 million shares remained available for future issuances.
Great Plains Energy has shares of common stock registered with the SEC for a defined contribution savings plan (401(k)). Shares issued under the plan may be either newly issued shares or shares purchased in the open market. At December 31, 2016, 0.7 million shares remained available for future issuances.
Treasury shares are held for future distribution upon issuance of shares in conjunction with the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Great Plains Energy's articles of incorporation restrict the payment of common stock dividends in the event common equity is 25% or less of total capitalization. In addition, if preferred stock dividendsLevel 2 –  Pricing inputs are not declaredquoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable. The types of assets and paid when scheduled, Great Plains Energy couldliabilities included in Level 2 are certain marketable debt securities, financial instruments traded in less than active markets or other financial instruments priced with models using highly observable inputs.
Level 3 – Significant inputs to pricing have little or no transparency. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation.
NAV - Investments that do not declare or pay common stock dividends or purchase any common shares. Ifhave a readily determinable fair value are measured at NAV. These investments do not consider the unpaid preferred stock dividendsobservability of inputs and, therefore, they are not included within the fair value hierarchy. The Evergy Companies include in arrears for six or more quarters, whether orthis category investments in private equity, real estate and alternative investment funds that do not consecutive, the preferred shareholders will be entitled to name two directors to the Great Plains Energy Board. Certain conditions in the MPSChave a readily determinable fair value. The underlying alternative investments include collateralized debt obligations, mezzanine debt and KCC orders authorizing the holding company structure require Great Plains Energy and KCP&L to maintain consolidated common equitya variety of at least 30% and 35%, respectively, of total capitalization (including only the amount of short-term debt in excess of the amount of construction work in progress). Under the Federal Power Act, KCP&L and GMO generally can pay dividends only out of retained earnings. The revolving credit agreements of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and GMO and the note purchase agreement for GMO's Series A, B and C Senior Notes contain a covenant requiring the respective company to maintain a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization ratio of not more than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times, except as the ratio pertains to Great Plains Energy, which was amended in June 2016, as further described in Note 11.
As of December 31, 2016, all of Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's retained earnings and net income were free of restrictions. As a result of the above restrictions, Great Plains Energy's subsidiaries had restricted net assets ofother investments.
Table of Contents


approximately $2.8 billionThe Evergy Companies record cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term borrowings on their consolidated balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Interest Rate Derivatives
The Evergy Companies are exposed to market risks arising from changes in interest rates and may use derivative instruments to manage these risks. From time to time, this may include entering into interest rate swap agreements to protect against unfavorable interest rate changes relating to forecasted debt transactions. These interest rate swap agreements can be designated as cash flow hedges, in which case, gains and losses on the interest rate swaps are deferred in other comprehensive income to be recognized as an adjustment to interest expense over the same period that the hedged interest payments affect earnings.

In December 2018, Evergy entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $500.0 million that has been designated as a cash flow hedge of a forecasted debt issuance in 2019. As of December 31, 2018, the interest rate swap had a fair value of $5.4 million and was recorded within other current liabilities on Evergy's consolidated balance sheet. For 2018, Evergy recorded a corresponding $5.4 million pre-tax loss in other comprehensive loss on Evergy's consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
The Evergy Companies measure the fair value of long-term debt using Level 2 measurements available as of the measurement date. The book value and fair value of the Evergy Companies' long-term debt and long-term debt of variable interest entities is summarized in the following table.
  December 31
  2018 2017
  Book Value Fair Value Book Value Fair Value
Long-term debt(a)
 (millions)
Evergy(b)
 $7,341.7
 $7,412.1
 $3,687.6
 $4,010.6
Westar Energy 3,689.8
 3,771.3
 3,687.6
 4,010.6
KCP&L(c)
 2,530.1
 2,637.5
 2,582.2
 2,799.1
Long-term debt of variable interest entities(a)
        
Evergy $81.4
 $81.3
 $109.9
 $110.8
Westar Energy 81.4
 81.3
 109.9
 110.8
(a) Includes current maturities.
(b) Book value as of December 31, 2016. The restrictions are not expected to affect2018, includes $144.8 million of fair value adjustments recorded in connection with purchase accounting for the Companies' ability to pay dividends at the current level in the foreseeable future.
14. PREFERRED STOCK
At December 31, 2016, 1.6 million shares of Cumulative No Par Preferred Stock, 390,000 shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock, $100 par value and 11.0 million shares of Preference Stock without par value were authorized under Great Plains Energy's articles of incorporation.
At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy had 862,500 sharesand Westar Energy merger, which are not part of Series B Preferred Stock issuedfuture principal payments and outstanding and had entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 750,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock atwill amortize over the closingremaining life of the anticipated acquisition with Westar. In August 2016, Great Plains Energy redeemed its 390,000 sharesassociated debt instrument. See Note 2 for more information regarding the merger transaction.
(c) KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of outstanding Cumulative Preferred Stock, $100 par value. See the discussion below for further information on these transactions and the pertinent rights and privilegesDecember 31, 2017.
Table of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock.Contents
Series A Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
On May 29, 2016, Great Plains Energy entered into a stock purchase agreement with OMERS, pursuant to which Great Plains Energy will issue and sell to OMERS 750,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, for an aggregate purchase price equal to $750 million at the closing of the merger. The stock purchase agreement is subject to various closing conditions.
Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall automatically convert three years after issuance into a number of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock equal to the Conversion Rate.Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The Conversion Rate is calculated as follows:following tables include the Evergy Companies' balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
If the average volume-weighted average price per share
DescriptionDecember 31, 2018 Level 1 Level 2Level 3NAV
Westar Energy (millions)
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust(a)
               
Domestic equity funds $70.6
  $63.9
  $
  $
  $6.7
 
International equity funds 36.2
  36.2
  
  
  
 
Core bond fund 37.5
  37.5
  
  
  
 
High-yield bond fund 18.9
  18.9
  
  
  
 
Emerging markets bond fund 15.4
  15.4
  
  
  
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 12.9
  12.9
  
  
  
 
Alternative investments fund 24.1
  
  
  
  24.1
 
Real estate securities fund 11.8
  
  
  
  11.8
 
Cash equivalents 0.1
  0.1
  
  
  
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 227.5
  184.9
  
  
  42.6
 
Rabbi trust               
Core bond fund 24.8
  
  
  
  24.8
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 5.6
  
  
  
  5.6
 
Cash equivalents 0.2
  0.2
  
  
  
 
Total rabbi trust 30.6
  0.2
  
  
  30.4
 
Total $258.1
  $185.1
  $
  $
  $73.0
 
KCP&L               
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust(a)
               
Equity securities $166.6
  $166.6
  $
  $
  $
 
Debt securities 

             
U.S. Treasury 42.1
  42.1
  
  
  
 
U.S. Agency 0.4
  
  0.4
  
  
 
State and local obligations 2.1
  
  2.1
  
  
 
Corporate bonds 30.9
  
  30.9
  
  
 
Foreign governments 0.1
  
  0.1
  
  
 
Cash equivalents 1.7
  1.7
  
  
  
 
Other 0.7
  0.7
  
  
  
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 244.6
  211.1
  33.5
  
  
 
Self-insured health plan trust(b)
               
Equity securities 0.5
  0.5
  
  
  
 
Debt securities 3.9
  0.3
  3.6
  
  
 
Cash and cash equivalents 8.0
  8.0
  
  
  
 
Total self-insured health plan trust 12.4
  8.8
  3.6
  
  
 
Total $257.0
  $219.9
  $37.1
  $
  $
 
Other Evergy               
Assets               
Rabbi trusts               
Fixed income fund $13.2
  $
  $
  $
  $13.2
 
Total rabbi trusts $13.2
  $
  $
  $
  $13.2
 
Liabilities               
Interest rate swaps (e)
 $5.4
  $
  $5.4
  $
  $
 
Total $5.4
  $
  $5.4
  $
  $
 
Evergy  
   
   
   
    
Assets  
   
   
   
    
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
 $472.1
  $396.0
  $33.5
  $
  $42.6
 
Rabbi trusts 43.8
  0.2
  
  
  43.6
 
Self-insured health plan trust (b)
 12.4
  8.8
  3.6
  
  
 
Total $528.3
  $405.0
  $37.1
  $
  $86.2
 
Liabilities               
Interest rate swaps (e)
 $5.4
  $
  $5.4
  $
  $
 
Total $5.4
  $
  $5.4
  $
  $
 
Table of Great Plains Energy common stock over 20 consecutive trading days commencing on the 22nd trading day prior to the date of conversion (Applicable Market Value) is:Contents


DescriptionDecember 31, 2017Level 1Level 2Level 3NAV
Westar Energy (millions)
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust(a)(c)
               
Domestic equity funds $73.8
  $
  $68.7
  $
  $5.1
 
International equity funds 47.9
  
  47.9
  
  
 
Core bond fund 33.3
  
  33.3
  
  
 
High-yield bond fund 18.1
  
  18.1
  
  
 
Emerging markets bond fund 17.3
  
  17.3
  
  
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 14.1
  
  14.1
  
  
 
Alternative investments fund 21.7
  
  
  
  21.7
 
Real estate securities fund 10.8
  
  
  
  10.8
 
Cash equivalents 0.1
  0.1
  
  
  
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 237.1
  0.1
  199.4
  
  37.6
 
Rabbi trust(c)
               
Core bond fund 27.3
  
  27.3
  
  
 
Combination debt/equity/other fund 6.8
  
  6.8
  
  
 
Cash equivalents 0.2
  0.2
  
  
  
 
Total rabbi trust 34.3
  0.2
  34.1
  
  
 
Total $271.4
  $0.3
  $233.5
  $
  $37.6
 
KCP&L(d)
               
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
               
Equity securities $183.8
  $183.8
  $
  $
  $
 
Debt securities  
   
   
   
   
 
U.S. Treasury 35.3
  35.3
  
  
  
 
U.S. Agency 0.4
  
  0.4
  
  
 
State and local obligations 2.1
  
  2.1
  
  
 
Corporate bonds 34.1
  
  34.1
  
  
 
Foreign governments 0.1
  
  0.1
  
  
 
Cash equivalents 2.5
  2.5
  
  
  
 
Other 0.1
  0.1
  
  
  
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 258.4
  221.7
  36.7
  
  
 
Self-insured health plan trust(b)
               
Equity securities 0.5
  0.5
  
  
  
 
Debt securities 2.7
  0.3
  2.4
  
  
 
Cash and cash equivalents 7.7
  7.7
  
  
  
 
Total self-insured health plan trust 10.9
  8.5
  2.4
  
  
 
Total $269.3
  $230.2
  $39.1
  $
  $
 
Evergy  
   
   
   
    
Assets  
   
   
   
    
Nuclear decommissioning trust(a)(c)
 $237.1
  $0.1
  $199.4
  $
  $37.6
 
Rabbi trust(c)
 34.3
  0.2
  34.1
  
  
 
Total $271.4
  $0.3
  $233.5
  $
  $37.6
 
(a)
Equal to Fair value is based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the trust and/or greater than $34.38, the Conversion Rate shall be 29.0855;valuation models.  
(b)
Less than $34.38 but greater than $28.65,Fair value is based on quoted market prices of the Conversion Rate shall be $1,000 dividedinvestments held by the Applicable Market Value; ortrust. Debt securities classified as Level 1 are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities. Debt securities classified as Level 2 are comprised of corporate bonds, U.S. Agency, state and local obligations, and other asset-backed securities.
(c)
Less than or equalIn the second quarter of 2018, Evergy and Westar Energy re-evaluated the classification, within the fair value hierarchy, of their various fund investments within both Westar Energy's nuclear decommissioning trust and rabbi trusts. As a result, Evergy and Westar Energy determined that certain fund investments within the nuclear decommissioning trust in the amount of $199.4 million as of December 31, 2017, should have been classified as Level 1, instead of Level 2. This determination is based on the fact that the fair value of these funds is based on daily published prices at which Evergy and Westar Energy are able to $28.65,redeem their investments without restriction on a daily basis. Evergy and Westar Energy also determined that certain fund investments within their rabbi trusts in the Conversion Rate shall be 34.9026.

OMERS can voluntarily convert its Series A Preferred Stock into Great Plains Energy common stock at any time at the 29.0855 Conversion Rate, subject to obtaining all necessary governmental approvals.
The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to a 7.25% annual dividend, payable in cash, Great Plains Energy common stock or a combination thereof. The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share.
OMERS will be entitled to name two directors to the Great Plains Energy Board if dividends payable with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears for two quarters and one observer on the Great Plains Energy Board if Great Plains Energy's credit rating is downgraded to below investment grade, so long as OMERS holds 50 percent of its original investment and subject to all necessary governmental approvals being obtained.
Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
In October 2016, Great Plains Energy completed a registered public offering of 17.3 million depositary shares, each representing a 1/20th interest in a share of Great Plains Energy's Series B Preferred Stock, without par value, at a public offering price of $50 per depositary share for total gross proceeds of $862.5 million (net proceeds of approximately $836.2 million after issuance costs). Great Plains Energy plans to use proceeds from the offering to fund a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar.

Each depositary share entitles the holder of such depositary share, through the bank depositary, to a 1/20th interest in the rights and preferences of the Series B Preferred Stock, including conversion, dividend, liquidation and voting rights, subject to the terms of the deposit agreement.

Table of Contents


Unless previously converted or redeemed, on or around September 15, 2019, each outstanding share of Series B Preferred Stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock equal to the Conversion Rate.

The Conversion Rate is calculated as follows:

If the volume-weighted average price per share, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments, of Great Plains Energy common stock over 20 consecutive trading days commencing on the 22nd trading day prior to the date of conversion (Applicable Market Value) is:

(a)Equalamount of $34.1 million as of December 31, 2017, should have been measured using the NAV per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient, instead of as a Level 2 investment. This determination is based on the fact that these funds do not meet the definition of readily determinable fair value due to or greater than $31.74, the Conversion Rate shall be 31.5060;absence of a published NAV. Evergy and Westar Energy have determined that these errors are immaterial to their current and previously filed financial reports and accordingly, have not revised prior periods but have reflected the changes in fair value hierarchy classification as of December 31, 2018.
(b)
(d)
Less than $31.74 but greater than $26.45, the Conversion Rate shall be $1,000 divided by the Applicable Market Value; orKCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.
(c)
(e)
Less than or equal to $26.45,The fair value of interest rate swaps are determined by calculating the Conversion Rate shall be 37.8080.net present value of expected payments and receipts under the interest rate swaps using observable market inputs including interest rates and LIBOR swap rates.
Table of Contents

At any time prior to September 15, 2019, a holder may elect to convert shares of the Series B Preferred Stock in whole or in part (but not less than one share of Series B Preferred Stock) into shares of Great Plains Energy common stock at the 31.5060 Conversion Rate.
Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock will be payable on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by Great Plains Energy's Board of Directors, and subject to Missouri law, at an annual rate of 7.00% on the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share of Series B Preferred Stock (or $50 per depositary share), payable in cash, Great Plains Energy common stock or a combination thereof.

Certain Evergy and Westar Energy investments included in the table above are measured at NAV as they do not have readily determinable fair values. In certain situations, these investments may have redemption restrictions.
The following table provides additional information on these Evergy and Westar Energy investments.
 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2018
 Fair Unfunded Fair Unfunded Redemption Length of
 Value Commitments Value Commitments Frequency Settlement
Westar Energy(millions)    
Nuclear decommissioning trust:     
Domestic equity funds$6.7
 $4.3
 $5.1
 $2.8
 (a) (a)
Alternative investments fund(b)
24.1
 
 21.7
 
 Quarterly 65 days
Real estate securities fund(b)
11.8
 
 10.8
 
 Quarterly 65 days
Total$42.6
 $4.3
 $37.6
 $2.8
    
Rabbi trust:           
Core bond fund$24.8
 $
 $
 $
 (c) (c)
Combination debt/equity/other fund5.6
 
 
 
 (c) (c)
Total$30.4
 $
 $
 $
    
Other Evergy           
Rabbi trusts:           
Fixed income fund(d)
$13.2
 $
 $
 $
 (c) (c)
Total Evergy investments at NAV$86.2
 $4.3
 $37.6
 $2.8
    
(a)
This investment is in five long-term private equity funds that do not permit early withdrawal. Investments in these funds cannot be distributed until the underlying investments have been liquidated, which may take years from the date of initial liquidation. Three funds have begun to make distributions. The initial investment in the fourth and fifth fund occurred in the second quarter of 2016 and first quarter of 2018, respectively. The fourth fund's term is 15 years, subject to the general partner's right to extend the term for up to three additional one-year periods.  The fifth fund's term will be 15 years after the initial closing date, subject to additional extensions approved by the Advisory Committee to provide for an orderly liquidation of fund investments and dissolution of the fund.
(b)
There is a holdback on final redemptions.
(c)
This investment can be redeemed immediately and is not subject to any restrictions on redemptions.
(d)
This investment is recorded at GMO. GMO amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.


The Evergy Companies hold equity and debt investments classified as securities in various trusts including for the purposes of funding the decommissioning of Wolf Creek and for the benefit of certain retired executive officers of Westar Energy. The Evergy Companies record net realized and unrealized gains and losses on the nuclear decommissioning trusts in regulatory liabilities on their consolidated balance sheets and record net realized and unrealized gains and losses on Westar Energy's rabbi trust in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
The following table summarizes the net unrealized gains (losses) for the Evergy Companies' nuclear decommissioning trusts and rabbi trusts.
  2018 2017 2016
Westar Energy (millions)
Nuclear decommissioning trust - equity securities $(31.8) $15.7
 $9.0
Rabbi trust 1.0
 (14.3) 1.4
Total $(30.8) $1.4
 $10.4
KCP&L(a)
      
Nuclear decommissioning trust - equity securities $(20.7) $26.7
 $14.8
Nuclear decommissioning trust - debt securities (2.5) 0.5
 (0.3)
Total $(23.2) $27.2
 $14.5
Evergy      
Nuclear decommissioning trust - equity securities $(54.1) $15.7
 $9.0
Nuclear decommissioning trust - debt securities (0.5) 
 
Rabbi trusts 1.0
 (14.3) 1.4
Total $(53.6) $1.4
 $10.4
Holders(a) KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy from the date of the Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to name two directors to the Great Plains Energy Board if dividends payable with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock are in arrears for six or more quarters, whether or not consecutive.merger, June 4, 2018 through December 31, 2018.
Cumulative Preferred Stock
In August 2016, Great Plains Energy redeemed its 390,000 shares of outstanding Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $100 per share, for a total redemption price of $40.1 million. Great Plains Energy redeemed all outstanding shares of its (i) 3.80% Preferred for $103.70 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.75 per share, for a total redemption price of $104.45 per share, (ii) 4.50% Preferred for $101.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.89 per share, for a total redemption price of $101.89 per share, (iii) 4.20% Preferred for $102.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.83 per share, for a total redemption price of $102.83 per share and (iv) 4.35% Preferred for $101.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.86 per share, for a total redemption price of $101.86 per share.
15.14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
Great Plains EnergySet forth below are descriptions of contingencies related to environmental matters that may impact the Evergy Companies' operations or their financial results. Management's assessment of these contingencies, which are based on federal and KCP&L are subject to extensive federal, state statutes and local environmental laws, regulations, and permit requirements relating to airregulatory agency and water quality, waste managementjudicial interpretations and disposal, natural resourcesactions, has evolved over time. There are a variety of final and healthproposed laws and safety.  In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations and remediation costs, these laws, regulations and permits authorize the imposition of substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions.  The cost of complying with current and future environmental requirements is expected to be material to Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.  Failure to comply with environmental requirements or to timely recover environmental costs through ratesthat could have a material adverse effect on Great Plains Energy'sthe Evergy Companies operations and KCP&L's resultsconsolidated financial results. Due in part to the complex nature of environmental laws and regulations, the Evergy Companies are unable to assess the impact of potential changes that may develop with respect to the environmental contingencies described below.
Cross-State Air Pollution Update Rule
In September 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Update Rule (CSAPR). The final rule addresses interstate transport of nitrogen oxides emissions in 22 states including Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma during the ozone season and the impact from the formation of ozone on downwind states with respect to the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Starting with the 2017 ozone season, the final rule revised the existing ozone season allowance budgets for Missouri and Oklahoma and established an ozone season budget for Kansas. In December 2018, the EPA finalized the CSAPR Close-Out Rule, which determined that the existing CSAPR Update Rule fully addresses applicable states' interstate pollution transport obligations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Therefore, the EPA is proposing no additional reduction in the current ozone season allowance budgets in order to address obligations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Various states and others are challenging the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (D.C. Circuit), but the rule remains in effect. It is not expected that this rule will have a material impact on the Evergy Companies' operations and consolidated financial position and cash flows.

results.


Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's current estimates of capital expenditures (exclusive of AFUDC and property taxes) overNational Ambient Air Quality Standards
Under the next four years to comply with environmental regulations are in the following table. The total cost of compliance with any existing, proposed or future laws and regulations may be significantly different from these cost estimates provided.
 2017201820192020
 (millions)
Great Plains Energy$43.4
$36.6
$11.5
$14.0
KCP&L34.9
16.5
7.6
13.0

The Companies expect to seek recovery of the costs associated with environmental requirements through rate increases; however, there can be no assurance that such rate increases would be granted. The Companies may be subject to materially adverse rate treatment in response to competitive, economic, political, legislative or regulatory factors and/or public perception of the Companies' environmental reputation.
The following discussion groups environmental and certain associated matters into the broad categories of air and climate change, water, solid waste and remediation.
Clean Air Act and Climate Change Overview
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (Clean Air Act)(CAA), the EPA set NAAQS for certain emissions known as the "criteria pollutants" considered harmful to public health and associated regulations enactedthe environment, including two classes of particulate matter (PM), ozone, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (a precursor to ozone), carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which result from fossil fuel combustion. Areas meeting the NAAQS are designated attainment areas while those that do not meet the NAAQS are considered nonattainment areas. Each state must develop a plan to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS. NAAQS must be reviewed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) formEPA at five-year intervals.
In October 2015, the EPA strengthened the ozone NAAQS by lowering the standards from 75 ppb to 70 ppb. In November 2017, the EPA designated all counties in the State of Kansas as well as the Missouri counties in KCP&L's and GMO's service territories as attainment/unclassifiable. It is not expected that this will have a comprehensive program to preserve and enhance air quality.  Statesmaterial impact on the Evergy Companies' consolidated financial results.
If areas surrounding the Evergy Companies' facilities are designated in the future as nonattainment and/or it is required to establish regulations and programsinstall additional equipment to address all requirementscontrol emissions at facilities of the Clean Air ActEvergy Companies, it could have a material impact on the operations and haveconsolidated financial results of the flexibility to enact more stringent requirements.  All of Great Plains Energy'sEvergy Companies.

Greenhouse Gases
Burning coal and KCP&L's generating facilities, and certain of their other facilities, are subject to the Clean Air Act.
Climate Change
The Companies' current generation capacity is primarily coal-fired and is estimated to produce about one ton offossil fuels releases carbon dioxide (CO2) per MWh, or approximately 19 million tons and 15 million tons per year for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, respectively. The Companies are subjectother gases referred to existing greenhouse gas reporting regulations and certain greenhouse gas requirements.  Federal or state legislation concerning the reduction of emissions ofas greenhouse gases including(GHG).  Various regulations under the federal CAA limit CO2, could be enacted and other GHG emissions, and in the future. At the international level, in December 2015 the Paris Agreement was adoptedaddition, other measures are being imposed or offered by nearly 200 countriesindividual states, municipalities and became effective in November 2016 as the threshold of at least 55 countries representing at least 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions have joined it through ratification. The Paris Agreement does not result in any new, legally binding obligations on the United States to meet a particular greenhouse gas emissions target, but establishes a framework for international cooperation on climate change. Other internationalregional agreements legally binding on the United States may be reached in the future. Greenhouse gas legislation has the potential of having significant financial and operational impacts on Great Plains Energy and KCP&L; however, the ultimate financial and operational consequences to Great Plains Energy and KCP&L cannot be determined until such legislation is passed. In the absence of new Congressional mandates, the EPA is proceeding with the regulationgoal of greenhouse gases under the existing Clean Air Act.reducing GHG emissions.
In AugustOctober 2015, the EPA finalizedpublished a rule establishing new source performance standards (NSPS) for GHGs that limit CO2 emission standardsemissions for new, modified and reconstructed affected fossil-fuel-firedcoal and natural gas fueled electric utility generating units to various levels per MWh depending on various characteristics of the units. The standards would not applyLegal challenges to Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's existing units unless the units were modified or reconstructedGHG NSPS have been filed in the future.

In AugustD.C. Circuit by various states and industry members. Also in October 2015, the EPA finalized its Clean Power Plan which sets CO2 emission performance rates for existing affected fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. Specifically, the EPA translated those performance rates intopublished a state goal measured in mass and rate based on each state's generation mix. The states have the ability to develop their own plans for affected units to achieve either the performance rates directly or the state goals, withrule establishing guidelines for the development, submittal and implementation of those


plans. Nationwide, by 2030, the EPA projects the Clean Power Plan would achieve CO2 emission reductions from the power sector of approximately 32% from CO2 emission levels in 2005.
The EPA has finalized an interim CO2 goal rate reduction in Kansas and Missouri (average of 2022-2029) of 34% and 26%, respectively, and 2030 targets in Kansas and Missouri of 44% and 37%, respectively. The baseline for these reductions is 2012states to regulate CO2 emissions adjusted by the EPA.from existing power plants. The EPA has also finalized mass based CO2 reduction goals.
Statesstandards for existing plants are required to submit plans to implement the Clean Power Plan. An EPA plan with either a rate-based or mass-based trading program has yet to be finalized and can be enforced in states that fail to submit approved plans.
In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay ofknown as the Clean Power Plan putting(CPP). Under the CPP, interim emissions performance rates must be achieved beginning in 2022 and final emissions performance rates must be achieved by 2030. Legal challenges to the CPP were filed by groups of states and industry members, including Westar Energy, in the D.C. Circuit. The CPP was stayed by the Supreme Court in February 2016 and, accordingly, is not currently being implemented by the states.
In April 2017, the EPA published in the Federal Register a notice of withdrawal of the proposed CPP federal plan, proposed model trading rules and proposed Clean Energy Incentive Program design details. Also in April 2017, the EPA published a notice in the Federal Register that it was initiating administrative reviews of the CPP and the GHG NSPS.
In October 2017, the EPA issued a proposed rule to repeal the CPP. The proposed rule indicates the CPP exceeds the EPA’s authority and the EPA has not determined whether they will issue a replacement rule. The EPA solicited comments on the legal interpretations contained in this rulemaking.
In December 2017, the EPA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to solicit feedback on specific areas of the CPP that could be changed.
In August 2018, the EPA published in the Federal Register proposed regulations, which contained (1) emission guidelines for GHG emissions from existing electric utility generating units (EGUs), (2) revisions to emission guideline implementing regulations and (3) revisions to the new source review (NSR) program. The proposed emission guidelines are better known as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. The ACE Rule would establish emission guidelines for states to use in the development of plans to reduce GHG emissions from existing coal-fired EGUs. The ACE Rule is also the replacement rule for the CPP. The ACE rule proposes to determine the "best system of emission reduction" (BSER) for GHG emissions from existing coal-fired EGUs as on-site, heat-rate


efficiency improvements. The proposed rule also provides states with a list of candidate technologies that can be used to establish standards of performance and incorporate these performance standards into state plans. In order for the states to be able to effectively implement the proposed emission guidelines contained in the ACE Rule, the EPA is proposing new regulations under 111(d) of the CAA to help clarify this process. In addition, the EPA is proposing revisions to the NSR program that will reduce the likelihood of triggering NSR for proposed heat-rate efficiency improvement projects at existing coal-fired EGUs. The public comment period for these proposed regulatory changes closed on October 31, 2018.
In December 2018, the EPA released a proposed rule to revise the existing GHG NSPS for new, modified and reconstructed fossil fuel-fired EGUs, which was issued in October 2015.  This proposed rule would determine that BSER for new EGUs is "the most efficient demonstrated steam cycle (e.g. supercritical steam conditions for large units and subcritical steam conditions for small units) in combination with the best operating practices."  This replaces the current determination that BSER for these units is the use of partial carbon capture and sequestration technology. The EPA is also proposing to address, in potential future rule making, existing operational limitations imposed by the rule on hold pending review inaero-derivative simple cycle combustion turbines.
Due to the United States Courtfuture uncertainty of Appeals for the District of Columbia CircuitCPP and any subsequent review byACE rules, the U.S. Supreme Court if such review is sought. ComplianceEvergy Companies cannot determine the impact on their operations or consolidated financial results, but the cost to comply with the Clean Power Plan has the potential of having significant financialCPP, should it be upheld and operational impacts on Great Plains Energy and KCP&L; however, the ultimate financial and operational consequences to Great Plains Energy and KCP&L cannotimplemented in its current or a substantially similar form, or ACE in its current or a substantially similar form, could be determined until the outcome of pending litigation is known and/or the state plans to implement the Clean Power Plan are known. material.
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water ActEvergy Companies discharge some of the water used in generation and associated regulations enacted byother operations. This water may contain substances deemed to be pollutants. A November 2015 EPA rule establishes effluent limitations guidelines (ELG) and standards for wastewater discharges, including limits on the amount of toxic metals and other pollutants that can be discharged. Implementation timelines for these requirements vary from 2018 to 2023. In April 2017, the EPA form a comprehensive program to restoreannounced it is reconsidering the ELG rule and preserve water quality.  Likecourt challenges have been placed in abeyance pending the Clean Air Act, states are required to establish regulations and programs to address all requirements of the Clean Water Act, and have the flexibility to enact more stringent requirements.  All of Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's generating facilities, and certain of their other facilities, are subject to the Clean Water Act.
EPA's review. In May 2014,September 2017, the EPA finalized regulations pursuanta rule to postpone the compliance dates for the new, more stringent, effluent limitations and pretreatment standards for bottom ash transport water and flue gas desulfurization wastewater. These compliance dates have been postponed for two years while the EPA completes its administrative reconsideration of the ELG rule. The Evergy Companies are evaluating the final rule and related developments and cannot predict the resulting impact on their operations or consolidated financial results, but believe costs to comply could be material if the rule is implemented in its current or substantially similar form.
In October 2014, the EPA's final standards for cooling intake structures at power plants to protect aquatic life took effect. The standards, based on Section 316(b) of the federal Clean Water Act regarding(CWA), require subject facilities to choose among seven best available technology options to reduce fish impingement. In addition, some facilities must conduct studies to assist permitting authorities to determine whether and what site-specific controls, if any, would be required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms. The Evergy Companies' current analysis indicates this rule will not have a significant impact on their coal plants that employ cooling water intake structures pursuanttowers or cooling lakes that can be classified as closed cycle cooling and do not expect the impact from this rule to a court approved settlement.  KCP&L generation facilitiesbe material. Plants without closed cycle cooling are under evaluation for compliance with cooling water intake structures are subject to the best technology availablethese standards based on studies completed to comply with such standards. The rule provides flexibility to work with the states to develop the best technology available to minimize aquatic species impacted by being pinned against intake screens (impingement) or drawn into cooling water systems (entrainment). Estimated costs to comply with Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act are included in the estimated capital expenditures table above.and may require additional controls that could be material.
KCP&L holds a permit from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR)MDNR covering water discharge from its Hawthorn Station.  The permit authorizes KCP&L to, among other things, withdraw water from the Missouri River for cooling purposes and return the heated water to the Missouri River.  KCP&L has applied for a renewal of this permit and the EPA has submitted an interim objection letter regarding the allowable amount of heat that can be contained in the returned water.  Until this matter is resolved, KCP&L continues to operate under its current permit. Future water permit renewals at KCP&L's Iatan Station and at GMO's Sibley and Lake Road Stations could also be impacted by the allowable amount of heat that can be contained in the returned water.  Great Plains EnergyEvergy and KCP&L cannot predict the outcome of these matters;this matter; however, while less significant outcomes are possible, these mattersthis matter may require a reduction in generation, installation of cooling towers or other technology to cool the water, or both, any of which could have a significantmaterial impact on Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's and KCP&L's results of operations and consolidated financial position and cash flows.  
In September 2015, the EPA finalized a revision of the technology-based effluent limitations guidelines and standards regulation to make the existing controls on discharges from steam electric power plants more stringent. The final rule sets the first federal limits on the levels of toxic metals in wastewater that can be discharged from power plants. The new requirements for existing power plants would be phased in between 2018 and 2023. The final rule establishes new or additional requirements for wastewaters associated with the following processes and byproducts at certain KCP&L and GMO stations: flue gas desulfurization, fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas mercuryresults.  


control, and combustion residual leachate from landfills and surface impoundments. Estimated capital costs to complyIn June 2015, the EPA along with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a final rule, are included ineffective August 2015, defining the estimated capital expenditures table above.
Solid Waste
SolidWaters of the United States (WOTUS) for purposes of the CWA. This rulemaking has the potential to impact all programs under the CWA. Expansion of regulated waterways is possible under the rule depending on regulating authority interpretation, which could impact several permitting programs. Various states and hazardous waste generation, storage, transportation, treatmentothers have filed lawsuits challenging the WOTUS rule. In February 2018, the EPA and disposal are regulated at the federal and state levels under various laws and regulations.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finalized a rule adding an applicability date to the 2015 rule, which makes the implementation date of the rule February 2020. In December 2014,2018, the EPA finalized regulations to regulate CCRs underand the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) subtitle D to address the risks from the disposalU.S. Army Corps of CCRs generated from the combustion of coal at electric generating facilities.  The Companies use coal in generating electricity and dispose of the CCRs in both on-site facilities and facilities owned by third parties.  KCP&L's Iatan, La Cygne, and Montrose Stations and GMO's Sibley Station have on-site facilities affected by the rule. The rule requires periodic assessments; groundwater monitoring; location restrictions; design and operating requirements; recordkeeping and notifications; and closure, among other requirements, for CCR units. The rule was promulgatedEngineers published in the Federal Register a proposed rule titled "Revised Definition of Waters of the United States. This proposed rule narrows the extent of the CWA jurisdiction as compared to the 2015 rule. The Evergy Companies are currently evaluating the WOTUS rule and related developments, but do not believe the rule, if upheld and implemented in its current or substantially similar form, will have a material impact on the Evergy Companies' operations or consolidated financial results.
Regulation of Coal Combustion Residuals
In the course of operating their coal generation plants, the Evergy Companies produce CCRs, including fly ash, gypsum and bottom ash. Some of this ash production is recycled, principally by selling to the aggregate industry. The EPA published a rule to regulate CCRs in April 17, 2015, which will require additional CCR handling, processing and became effective six months after promulgationstorage equipment and closure of certain ash disposal units. The Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act allows states to achieve delegated authority for CCR rules from the EPA. This has the potential to impact compliance options. In July 2018, KDHE submitted a CCR permit program application to the EPA under authority of the WIIN Act. In November 2018, KDHE received notice from the EPA that its application is deficient and requested additional clarifying information. KDHE has decided it is not going to move forward with various obligations effectiveadditional submittals at specified times within the rule. Estimated capital costs to complythis time and will wait until current legal action associated with the CCR rule are includedis final along with planned upcoming modifications to the CCR rule. The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) is working on a rule revision, which will allow the state to apply for authority over the federal CCR regulation. The regulation is expected to be promulgated by early 2019. MDNR will then determine when to submit a WIIN Act application to the EPA. Similar to the process in Kansas, this would allow Missouri state regulators to gain control of the CCR program. It will take up to one year from submittal of the Missouri application for the EPA to take final action and grant authority to the state, if such authority is granted.
On July 30, 2018, the EPA published in the estimated capital expenditures table above. Certain requirementsFederal Register a final rule called the Phase I, Part I CCR Remand Rule in order to modify portions of the 2015 rulemaking. The Phase I, Part I rule provides a timeline extension for unlined impoundments and landfills that must close due to groundwater impacts or location restrictions. The rule also sets risk-based limits for certain groundwater constituents where a maximum contaminant level did not previously exist. These rule modifications add flexibility when assessing compliance.
On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit court issued a ruling in the CCR rule litigation between the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, the EPA and environmental organizations. Portions of the rule wouldwere vacated and were remanded back to the EPA for potential modification. Potential revisions to remanded sections could force all unlined surface impoundments to close regardless of groundwater conditions. Any changes to the rule based on this court decision will require Great Plains Energy or KCP&L to expedite or incur additional capital expendituresrulemaking from the EPA. In October 2018, a coalition of environmental groups (including Sierra Club) filed a petition for review in the future.

Great Plains EnergyD.C. Circuit challenging the Phase I, Part I revisions to the CCR Rule. In November 2018, this coalition requested the EPA to stay the October 31, 2020 deadline extension for initiating closure for unlined impoundments and KCP&Llandfills that must close due to groundwater impacts or location restrictions. The EPA has rejected this request and the coalition has filed a petition with the court for a similar stay. If granted, the compliance date will revert to the previously established date in April of 2019. In response, the EPA has filed a motion with the D.C. Circuit to voluntarily remand without vacatur the Part I, Phase I rule. If the October 31, 2020 deadline is modified by either of these actions, then some CCR units in the Evergy Companies' fleet could have AROsto initiate closure on an earlier timeline than what currently exists, but the Evergy Companies do not believe the earlier closure timeline would have a material impact on their balance sheetsoperations or consolidated financial results.
The Evergy Companies have recorded AROs for their current estimates for the closure and post-closure of ash disposal ponds, and landfills containing CCRs. Certain requirementsbut the revision of the rule couldthese AROs may be required in the future require further evaluationdue to changes in existing CCR regulations, the results of the expected method of compliance and refinement of assumptions underlying the cost estimates for closure and post-closure. Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's AROs could increase from the amounts presently recorded.
Remediation
Certain federal and state laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), hold current and previous owners or operators of contaminated facilities and persons who arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances liable for the cost of investigation and cleanup.  CERCLA and other laws also authorize the EPA and other agencies to issue orders compelling potentially responsible parties to clean up sites that are determined to present an actual or potential threat to human health or the environment.  GMO retains some environmental liability for several operations and investments it no longer owns.  In addition, GMO also owns, or has acquired liabilities from companies that once owned or operated, former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites, which are subject to the supervision of the EPA and various state environmental agencies.
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, KCP&L had $0.3 million accrued for environmental remediation expenses, which covers ground water monitoring at a former MGP site.  The amount accrued was established on an undiscounted basis and KCP&L does not currently have an estimated time frame over which the accrued amount may be paid.
In addition to the $0.3 million accrual above, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, Great Plains Energy had $1.4 million accrued for the future investigation and remediation of certain additional GMO identified MGP sites and retained liabilities.  This estimate was based upon review of the potential costs associated with conducting investigative and remedial actions at identified sites, as well as the likelihood of whether such actions will be necessary.  This estimate could change materially after further investigation, and could also be affected by the actions of environmental agencies and the financial viability of other potentially responsible parties; however, given the uncertainty of these items the possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amount accrued is not estimable.
GMO has pursued recovery of remediation costs from insurance carriers and other potentially responsible parties.  As a result of a settlement with an insurance carrier, approximately $1.5 million in insurance proceeds less an annual deductible is available to GMO to recover qualified MGP remediation expenses.  GMO would seek recovery of additional remediation costs and expenses through rate increases; however, there can be no assurance that such rate increases would be granted.


Contractual Commitmentsgroundwater monitoring of CCR units or changes in interpretation of existing CCR regulations or changes in the timing or cost to close ash disposal ponds. If revisions to these AROs are necessary, the impact on the Evergy Companies' operations or consolidated financial results could be material.
Great PlainsStorage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel. In 2010, the DOE filed a motion with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to withdraw its then pending application to construct a national repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The NRC has not yet issued a final decision on the matter.
Wolf Creek has elected to build a dry cask storage facility to expand its existing on-site spent nuclear fuel storage, which is expected to provide additional capacity prior to 2022. Wolf Creek has finalized a settlement agreement through 2019 with the DOE for reimbursement of costs to construct this facility that would not have otherwise been incurred had the DOE begun accepting spent nuclear fuel. The Evergy Companies expect the majority of the remaining cost to construct the dry cask storage facility that would not have otherwise been incurred will be reimbursed by the DOE. The Evergy Companies cannot predict when, or if, an off-site storage site or alternative disposal site will be available to receive Wolf Creek's spent nuclear fuel and will continue to monitor this activity.
Nuclear Insurance
Nuclear liability, property and accidental outage insurance is maintained for Wolf Creek. These policies contain certain industry standard terms, conditions and exclusions, including, but not limited to, ordinary wear and tear and war. An industry aggregate limit of $3.2 billion for nuclear events ($1.8 billion of non-nuclear events) plus any reinsurance, indemnity or any other source recoverable by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), provider of property and accidental outage insurance, exists for acts of terrorism affecting Wolf Creek or any other NEIL insured plant within 12 months from the date of the first act. In addition, participation is required in industry-wide retrospect assessment programs as discussed below.
Nuclear Liability Insurance
Pursuant to the Price-Anderson Act, liability insurance includes coverage against public nuclear liability claims resulting from nuclear incidents to the required limit of public liability, which is approximately $14.1 billion. This limit of liability consists of the maximum available commercial insurance of $0.5 billion and the remaining $13.6 billion is provided through mandatory participation in an industry-wide retrospective assessment program. Under this retrospective assessment program, the owners of Wolf Creek are jointly and severally subject to an assessment of up to $137.6 million (Evergy's share is $129.2 million and each of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's is $64.6 million), payable at no more than $20.5 million (Evergy's share is $19.2 million and each of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's is $9.6 million) per incident per year per reactor for any commercial U.S. nuclear reactor qualifying incident. Both the total and yearly assessment is subject to an inflationary adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index and applicable premium taxes. In addition, the U.S. Congress could impose additional revenue-raising measures to pay claims.
Nuclear Property and Accidental Outage Insurance
The owners of Wolf Creek carry decontamination liability, nuclear property damage and premature nuclear decommissioning liability insurance for Wolf Creek totaling approximately $2.8 billion. Insurance coverage for non-nuclear property damage accidents total approximately $2.3 billion. In the event of an extraordinary nuclear accident, insurance proceeds must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination in accordance with a plan mandated by the NRC. The Evergy Companies' share of any remaining proceeds can be used to pay for property damage or, if certain requirements are met, including decommissioning the plant, toward a shortfall in the nuclear decommissioning trust fund. The owners also carry additional insurance with NEIL to help cover costs of replacement power and other extra expenses relatedincurred during a prolonged outage resulting from accidental property damage at Wolf Creek. If significant losses were incurred at any of the nuclear plants insured under the NEIL policies, the owners of Wolf Creek may be subject to retrospective assessments under the current policies of approximately $37.4 million (Evergy's share is $35.2 million and each of Westar Energy's and KCP&L's is $17.6 million).


Nuclear Insurance Considerations
Although the Evergy Companies maintain various insurance policies to provide coverage for potential losses and liabilities resulting from an accident or an extended outage, the insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the costs that could result from a catastrophic accident or extended outage at Wolf Creek. Any substantial losses not covered by insurance, to the extent not recoverable in prices, would have a material effect on the Evergy Companies' consolidated financial results.

Contractual Commitments - Leases
The Evergy Companies lease office buildings, computer equipment, vehicles, rail cars and other property and equipment, including rail cars to serve jointly-owned generating units where Westar Energy or KCP&L is the managing partner and are reimbursed by other joint-owners for their proportionate share of the cost. In determining lease expense, the effects of scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term are recognized. Rental expense and estimated future commitments under operating leases are detailed in the following table.
  2016 2015 2014
  (millions)
Great Plains Energy $15.0
 $16.8
 $16.0
KCP&L 13.7
 15.0
 14.0
  Total Operating Leases
  Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
Rental expense: (millions)
2016 $13.6
 $13.6
 $13.7
2017 15.7
 15.7
 13.1
2018 24.5
 17.7
 11.4
       
Future commitments:      
2019 $24.2
 $14.0
 $10.2
2020 20.7
 10.1
 10.6
2021 18.4
 8.1
 10.3
2022 15.2
 5.2
 10.0
2023 12.4
 2.8
 9.6
After 2023 95.0
 3.1
 91.8
Total $185.9
 $43.3
 $142.5
Great Plains Energy's(a) KCP&L amounts are only included in consolidated Evergy following the date of the closing of the merger, June 4, 2018.
The Evergy Companies identify capital leases based on defined criteria. For both vehicles and computer equipment, new leases are signed each month based on the terms of master lease agreements. Assets recorded under capital leases are detailed in the following table.
  December 31
  2018 2017
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
  (millions)
Vehicles $20.2
 $20.2
 $
 $19.7
 $19.7
 $
Computer equipment 0.2
 0.2
 
 0.9
 0.9
 
Generation plant 296.7
 40.1
 
 40.1
 40.1
 
Other 5.2
 
 2.6
 
 
 2.6
Accumulated amortization (160.0) (20.3) (1.1) (17.1) (17.1) (1.1)
Total capital leases $162.3
 $40.2
 $1.5
 $43.6
 $43.6
 $1.5
(a) KCP&L's&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy as of December 31, 2017.


Capital leases are treated as operating leases for rate making purposes. Minimum annual rental payments, excluding administrative costs such as property taxes, insurance and maintenance, under capital leases are detailed in the following table.
  Total Capital Leases
  Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L
  (millions)
2019 $6.4
 $6.0
 $0.2
2020 5.8
 5.4
 0.2
2021 5.3
 4.9
 0.2
2022 4.7
 4.3
 0.2
2023 4.0
 3.6
 0.2
After 2023 48.6
 46.4
 1.1
Total capital lease payments 74.8
 70.6
 2.1
Amounts representing imputed interest (25.8) (24.6) (0.6)
Present value of net minimum lease payments under capital leases 49.0
 46.0
 1.5
Less: current portion (3.9) (3.7) (0.1)
Total long-term obligations under capital leases $45.1
 $42.3
 $1.4
Contractual Commitments - Fuel, Power and Other
The Evergy Companies' contractual commitments at December 31, 2016,2018, excluding pensions, and long-term debt and leases, are detailed in the following tables.
Great Plains Energy            
Evergy              
 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 After 2021Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 After 2023Total
Lease commitments (millions)
Operating lease $12.9
 $11.0
 $9.3
 $9.7
 $9.7
 $110.5
 $163.1
Capital lease 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 3.1
 5.1
Purchase commitments               (millions)
Fuel 259.0
 145.8
 62.2
 53.8
 11.2
 100.8
 632.8
 $423.6
 $364.4
 $95.3
 $82.9
 $87.5
 $116.2
 $1,169.9
Power 47.3
 47.3
 47.3
 47.3
 47.4
 462.2
 698.8
 47.3
 47.3
 47.4
 47.6
 47.8
 366.8
 604.2
Other 50.1
 32.0
 33.3
 5.9
 6.5
 38.7
 166.5
 137.8
 18.8
 13.4
 6.8
 2.1
 34.4
 213.3
Total contractual commitments $369.7
 $236.5
 $152.5
 $117.1
 $75.2
 $715.3
 $1,666.3
 $608.7
 $430.5
 $156.1
 $137.3
 $137.4
 $517.4
 $1,987.4
KCP&L                    
  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021 After 2021Total
Lease commitments (millions)
Operating lease $12.0
  $11.0
  $9.3
  $9.7
  $9.7
  $110.5
  $162.2
Capital lease 0.2
  0.2
  0.2
  0.2
  0.2
  1.6
  2.6
Purchase commitments                    
Fuel 221.5
  119.4
  43.6
  35.1
  1.8
  100.8
  522.2
Power 34.8
  34.8
  34.8
  34.8
  34.9
  324.9
  499.0
Other 49.3
  31.1
  30.6
  5.0
  5.6
  33.0
  154.6
Total contractual commitments $317.8
  $196.5
  $118.5
  $84.8
  $52.2
  $570.8
  $1,340.6
Westar Energy                    
  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023 After 2023Total
Purchase commitments (millions)
Fuel $240.9
  $218.1
  $25.9
  $45.7
  $46.9
  $74.1
  $651.6
Other 87.4
  8.9
  5.5
  2.2
  
  
  104.0
Total contractual commitments $328.3
  $227.0
  $31.4
  $47.9
  $46.9
  $74.1
  $755.6
Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's lease commitments end in 2048. Operating lease commitments include rail cars to serve jointly-owned generating units where KCP&L is the managing partner. Of the amounts included in the table above, KCP&L will be reimbursed by the other owners for approximately $1.5 million in 2017, $1.2 million in 2018 and approximately $0.4 million per year from 2019 to 2025, for a total of $5.5 million.
KCP&L                    
  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023 After 2023Total
Purchase commitments (millions)
Fuel $162.6
  $126.9
  $69.4
  $37.2
  $40.6
  $42.1
  $478.8
Power 34.8
  34.8
  34.9
  35.1
  35.3
  254.5
  429.4
Other 34.7
  9.0
  7.0
  3.8
  1.6
  29.7
  85.8
Total contractual commitments $232.1
  $170.7
  $111.3
  $76.1
  $77.5
  $326.3
  $994.0
Fuel commitments consist of commitments for nuclear fuel, coal and coal transportation. Power commitments consist of certain commitments for renewable energy under power purchase agreements. Other represents individual commitments entered into in the ordinary course of business.
16. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
GMO Western Energy Crisis
In response to complaints of excessive prices in the California energy markets, FERC issued an order in July 2001 requiring net sellers of power in the California markets from October 2, 2000, through June 20, 2001, at prices above a FERC-determined competitive market clearing price, to make refunds to net purchasers of power in the California market during that time period.  Because MPS Merchant was a net purchaser of power during the refund period, it has received approximately $8 million in refunds through settlements with certain sellers of power.  MPS Merchant estimates that it is entitled to approximately $12 million in additional refunds under the standards FERC
Table of Contents


has used in this case once a comprehensive resettlement of those markets occurs, as required by FERC.  FERC has stated that interest will be applied to the refunds but the amount of interest has not yet been determined.

In November 2014, FERC issued an order finding that MPS Merchant engaged in tariff violations during the periods prior to October 2, 2000 (the Summer Period) and ordered refunds in the form of disgorgement of certain revenues. MPS Merchant (and other parties) filed a request for rehearing challenging FERC's findings of tariff violations and the remedy imposed in the November 2014 order. Additionally, several parties representing California utilities and governmental agencies filed a request for clarification or rehearing focusing on the remedy.
In November 2015, FERC issued an order denying MPS Merchant's request for rehearing and expanded the remedy to include additional MPS Merchant sales in the California markets. MPS Merchant filed another request for rehearing, challenging the expanded remedy.
In February 2016, FERC issued an order expanding the amount of revenues that MPS Merchant would be required to disgorge to include all revenues in excess of the FERC-determined competitive market clearing price for all sales in the California markets during the Summer Period that occurred in any hour in which any remaining respondent in the proceeding was found to have committed a tariff violation.
In October 2016, MPS Merchant reached a settlement agreement with certain California utilities and governmental agencies that would settle all issues in the case in exchange for $7.5 million of cash consideration as well as MPS Merchant's interest in additional funds it was entitled to during the refund period discussed above. The settlement agreement was filed with FERC in December 2016. In accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement, the $7.5 million of cash consideration will begin accruing interest at the FERC interest rate beginning on January 1, 2017, until the date paid.
In January 2017, FERC issued an order denying a motion filed in conjunction with and as a condition of the settlement agreement and ordered MPS Merchant and the California utilities and governmental agencies to notify FERC by February 27, 2017 whether they intended to revise the settlement agreement or withdraw it. In February 2017, MPS Merchant and the California utilities and governmental agencies filed a notice with FERC revising the settlement agreement to waive the condition of the settlement agreement that was contingent upon the motion denied by FERC. The revised settlement agreement is subject to approval by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and FERC.
As a result of the developments noted above, Great Plains Energy recorded a $7.5 million loss in other operating expenses in 2016.
17.15. GUARANTEES
In the ordinary course of business, Great Plains EnergyEvergy and certain of its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include, for example, guarantees and letters of credit. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the extension of sufficient credit to accomplish the subsidiary's intended business purposes. In connection with the closing of the merger, Evergy assumed the guarantees previously provided to GMO by Great Plains Energy. The majority of these agreements guarantee the Company'sEvergy's own future performance, so a liability for the fair value of the obligation is not recorded.
At December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy2018, Evergy has provided $135.3$111.3 million of credit support for GMO as follows:
Great Plains EnergyEvergy direct guarantees to GMO counterparties totaling $38.7$17.0 million, which expire in 2017 and 20182020, and
Great Plains EnergyEvergy's guarantee of GMO long-term debt totaling $96.6$94.3 million, which includes debt with maturity dates ranging from 20172019 to 2023.
Great Plains EnergyEvergy has also guaranteed GMO's commercial paper program. At December 31, 2016,2018, GMO had $201.9$150.0 million of commercial paper outstanding. None of the guaranteed obligations are subject to default or prepayment if GMO's credit ratings were downgraded.


18.16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND RELATIONSHIPS
In the normal course of business, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO engage in related party transactions with one another. A summary of these transactions and the amounts associated with them is provided below. All related party transaction amounts between Westar Energy and either KCP&L or GMO only reflect activity between June 4, 2018, the date of the merger, and December 31, 2018.
Jointly-Owned Plants and Shared Services
KCP&L employees manage GMO's business and operate its facilities at cost, including GMO's 18% ownership interest in KCP&L's Iatan Nos. 1 and 2.  The operating expenses and capital costs billed from KCP&L to GMO were $183.2 million for 2018, $196.3 million for 2017 and $194.4 million for 2016, $183.62016.
Westar Energy employees manage Jeffrey Energy Center and operate its facilities at cost, including GMO's 8% ownership interest in Jeffrey Energy Center. The operating expenses and capital costs billed from Westar Energy to GMO for Jeffrey Energy Center and other various business activities were $12.3 million for 20152018.
KCP&L employees manage La Cygne Station and $173.9operate its facilities at cost, including Westar Energy's 50% ownership interest in La Cygne Station. KCP&L and Westar Energy employees also provide one another with shared service support, including costs related to human resources, information technology, accounting and legal services. The operating expenses and capital costs billed from KCP&L to Westar Energy were $82.9 million for 2014. Additionally,2018. The operating and capital costs billed from Westar Energy to KCP&L and GMO engage in wholesale electricity transactions with each other. KCP&L's net wholesale sales to GMO were $0.8$17.5 million $0.2 million and $12.7 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.for 2018.
Money Pool
KCP&L and GMO are also authorized to participate in the Great Plains EnergyEvergy, Inc. money pool, an internal financing arrangement in which funds may be lent on a short-term basis to KCP&L and GMO from Great Plains EnergyEvergy, Inc. and between KCP&L and GMO. At December 31, 20162018 and 2015,2017, KCP&L had no outstanding receivables or payables under the money pool.


The following table summarizes Westar Energy's and KCP&L's related party net receivables.receivables and payables.
 December 31 December 31 
 2016 2015  2018 2017 
Westar Energy (millions) 
Net receivable from GMO $2.6
 $
 
Net payable to KCP&L (13.5) 
 
Net payable to Evergy (1.4) 
 
 (millions)      
KCP&L     
Net receivable from GMO $64.6
 $50.0
  $72.6
 $65.8
 
Net receivable from Westar Energy 13.5
 
 
Net receivable from Evergy 15.7
 
 
Net receivable from Great Plains Energy 2.6
 15.8
  
 18.9
 
Tax Allocation Agreement
19. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Great PlainsEvergy files a consolidated federal income tax return as well as unitary and combined income tax returns in several state jurisdictions with Kansas and Missouri being the most significant. Income taxes for consolidated or combined subsidiaries are allocated to the subsidiaries based on separate company computations of income or loss. As of December 31, 2018, Westar Energy and KCP&L are exposedhad income taxes receivable from (payable to) Evergy of $42.7 million and $(2.0) million, respectively.
17. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Evergy's authorized capital stock consists of 600 million shares of common stock, without par value, and 12 million shares of Preference Stock, without par value.
Evergy Registration Statements
In November 2018, Evergy filed an automatic shelf registration statement providing for the sale of unlimited amounts of securities with the SEC, which expires in November 2021.
In September 2018, Evergy registered shares of its common stock with the SEC for its Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan. Shares issued under the plan may be either newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market.
In June 2018, Evergy registered shares of its common stock with the SEC for the Great Plains Energy 401(k) Savings Plan and Westar Energy, Inc. Employees' 401(k) Savings Plan, among other compensation plans, that Evergy assumed in connection with the merger transaction. Shares issued under the plans may be either newly issued shares or shares purchased on the open market.
Common Stock Repurchase Program
In July 2018, the Evergy Board authorized the repurchase of up to 60 million shares of Evergy's common stock. Although this repurchase authorization has no expiration date, Evergy expects to repurchase the 60 million shares by mid-2020. Evergy plans to utilize various methods to effectuate the share repurchase program, including but not limited to, a varietyseries of transactions that may include accelerated share repurchases, open market risks including interest ratestransactions or other means, subject to market conditions and commodity prices.  Management has established risk management policiesapplicable legal requirements. The repurchase program may be suspended, discontinued or resumed at any time. For 2018, Evergy had total repurchases of common stock of approximately $1,042 million and strategieshad repurchased 16.4 million shares under the repurchase program. These repurchase totals include shares repurchased under accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreements, one of which had not reached final settlement as of December 31, 2018, and are discussed further below. Evergy retires repurchased common stock shares in the period the shares are repurchased.
In August 2018, Evergy entered into two ASR agreements with financial institutions to reducepurchase $450.0 million of Evergy common stock. The ASR agreements reached final settlement in the potentially adverse effectsfourth quarter of 2018 and resulted in
Table of Contents


the delivery of 7.9 million shares to Evergy based on the average daily volume weighted-average price of Evergy common stock during the term of the ASR agreements, less a negotiated discount.
In November 2018, Evergy entered into an ASR agreement with a financial institution to purchase $475.0 million of Evergy common stock. In December 2018, the financial institution delivered to Evergy 6.4 million shares of common stock, representing a partial settlement of the contract, based on then-current market prices and Evergy paid a total of $475.0 million. The upfront payment was recorded as a reduction to Evergy, Inc. shareholders' equity and as a repurchase of common stock on Evergy's consolidated statements of cash flows.
The final number of shares of Evergy common stock that Evergy may receive or be required to remit upon settlement of the ASR agreement will be based on the average daily volume weighted-average price of Evergy common stock during the term of the ASR agreement, less a negotiated discount. Final settlement of the ASR agreement will occur by March 2019, but may occur earlier at the option of the financial institution. Evergy expects that the volatilityfinal settlement of the markets mayASR agreement will result in the delivery of additional shares of common stock to Evergy at no additional cost.
Evergy reflects ASRs as a repurchase of common stock in the period the shares are delivered for purposes of calculating earnings per share and as forward contracts indexed to its own common stock. Evergy's ASRs have met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification and therefore are not accounted for as derivative instruments.
Dividend Restrictions
Evergy depends on Great Plains Energy'sits subsidiaries to pay dividends on its common stock. The Evergy Companies have certain restrictions stemming from statutory requirements, corporate organizational documents, covenants and other conditions that could affect dividend levels or the ability to pay dividends.
The KCC order authorizing the merger transaction requires Evergy to maintain consolidated common equity of at least 35% of total consolidated capitalization.
Under the Federal Power Act, Westar Energy, KCP&L's operating results. Great Plains Energy's&L and KCP&L's interest rate risk management activities have included using derivative instruments to hedge against future interest rate fluctuations on anticipated debt issuances. Commodity risk management activities, includingGMO generally can pay dividends only out of retained earnings. Certain conditions in the use of certain derivative instruments, are subject toMPSC and KCC orders authorizing the management, direction and control of an internal commodity risk committee.  Management maintains commodity price risk management strategies that use derivative instruments to reduce the effects of fluctuations in wholesale sales and fuel and purchased power expense caused by commodity price volatility.
Counterparties to commodity derivatives expose Great Plainsmerger transaction also require Westar Energy and KCP&L to credit lossmaintain consolidated common equity of at least 40% of total capitalization. Other conditions in the event of nonperformance.  This credit loss is limited to the cost of replacing these contracts at current market rates. Derivative instruments, excluding those instruments that qualify for the NPNS election, which are accounted for by accrual accounting, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value as an asset or liability.  Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recognized in net income, except hedges for KCP&L'sMPSC and GMO's utility operations that are recorded to a regulatory asset or liability consistent with KCC and MPSC regulatory orders. For derivative contracts with counterparties under master netting arrangements, Great Plainsmerger orders require Westar Energy, and KCP&L can net receivables and payables with each respective counterparty.
Interest Rate Risk Management
In June 2016, Great Plains Energy entered into four interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $4.4 billion, to hedge against interest rate fluctuations on future issuances of long-term debt expected to be issued to finance a portion of the cash consideration for the anticipated acquisition of Westar. Settlement of the interest rate swaps is contingent on the consummation of the anticipated acquisition of Westar. The interest rate swaps have been designated as economic hedges (non-hedging derivatives). The fair values of these instruments are recorded as derivative assets or liabilities with an offsetting entry recorded to interest charges.
Commodity Risk Management
KCP&L and GMO have Transmission Congestion Rights (TCRs)to maintain credit ratings of at least investment grade. If Westar Energy's, KCP&L's or GMO's credit ratings are downgraded below the investment grade level as a result of their affiliation with Evergy or any of Evergy's affiliates, the impacted utility shall not pay a dividend to Evergy without KCC or MPSC approval or until the impacted utility's investment grade credit rating has been restored.
The master credit facility of Evergy, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO and the note purchase agreement for GMO's Series A, B and C Senior Notes contain covenants requiring the respective company to maintain a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization ratio of not more than 0.65 to 1.00 at all times.
As of December 31, 2018, all of Evergy's and Westar Energy's retained earnings and net income were free of restrictions and KCP&L had a retained earnings restriction of $192.0 million. Evergy's subsidiaries had restricted net assets of approximately $5.1 billion as of December 31, 2018. These restrictions are not expected to affect the Evergy Companies' ability to pay dividends at the current level for the foreseeable future.
18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
In determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the Evergy Companies assess the entity's purpose and design, including the nature of the entity's activities and the risks that they utilizethe entity was designed to hedge against congestion costscreate and protect load pricespass through to its variable interest holders. A reporting enterprise is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE. The trust holding an 8% interest in the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) Integrated Marketplace. These financial contracts have been designated as economic hedges (non-hedging derivatives). The fair values of these instruments areJeffrey
Table of Contents


recorded as derivative assetsEnergy Center was a VIE until the expiration of a purchase option in July 2017. The trust holding Westar Energy's 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2 is a VIE and Westar Energy remains the primary beneficiary of the trust.
All involvement with entities by the Evergy Companies is assessed to determine whether such entities are VIEs and, if so, whether or liabilitiesnot the Evergy Companies are the primary beneficiaries of the entities. The Evergy Companies also continuously assess whether they are the primary beneficiary of the VIE with which they are involved. Prospective changes in facts and circumstances may cause identification of the primary beneficiary to be reconsidered.
8% Interest in Jeffrey Energy Center
Under an agreement with an offsetting entry recordedoriginal expiration of January 2019, Westar Energy leased an 8% interest in Jeffrey Energy Center from a trust. The trust was financed with an equity contribution from an owner participant and debt issued by the trust. The trust was created specifically to purchase the 8% interest in Jeffrey Energy Center and lease it to a regulatory asset or liability. The settlement costs are included inthird party, and does not hold any other assets. Westar Energy met the requirements to be considered the primary beneficiary of the trust until July 2017, when a recovery mechanism.  A regulatory asset or liability is recordedcontractual option to reflectpurchase the change8% interest in the timingplant covered by the lease expired. Accordingly, Westar Energy deconsolidated the trust in the third quarter of recognition authorized by KCC and MPSC. Recovery of actual costs will not impact earnings, but will impact cash flows due2017.
In February 2019, Westar Energy entered into an agreement to extend the timinglease of the recovery mechanism.8% interest in Jeffrey Energy Center owned by the trust until August 2019. At the expiration of the lease term, Westar Energy will purchase the 8% interest from the trust.
MPS Merchant,
50% Interest in La Cygne Unit 2
Under an agreement that expires in September 2029, Westar Energy entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with a trust under which the trust purchased Westar Energy's 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2 and subsequently leased it back to Westar Energy. The trust was financed with an equity contribution from an owner participant and debt issued by the trust. The trust was created specifically to purchase the 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2 and lease it back to Westar Energy, and does not hold any other assets. Westar Energy meets the requirements to be considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. In determining the primary beneficiary of the trust, Westar Energy concluded that the activities of the trust that most significantly impact its economic performance and that Westar Energy has certain long-term natural gas contracts remainingthe power to direct include (1) the operation and maintenance of the 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2 and (2) Westar Energy's ability to exercise a purchase option at the end of the agreement at the lesser of fair value or a fixed amount. Westar Energy has the potential to receive benefits from its former non-regulated trading operations, manages the daily delivery of its remaining contractual commitments with economic hedges (non-hedging derivatives) to reduce its exposure to changes in market prices.  Within the trading portfolio, MPS Merchant takes certain positions to hedge physical sale or purchase contracts.  MPS Merchant recordstrust that could potentially be significant if the fair value of physical trading energy contracts as derivativethe 50% interest in La Cygne Unit 2 at the end of the agreement is greater than the fixed amount.
The following table summarizes the assets orand liabilities with an offsetting entryrelated to the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
The gross notional contract amount and recorded fair values of open positions for derivative instruments are summarized in the following table.  The fair values of these derivativesVIE described above that are recorded on theEvergy's and Westar Energy's consolidated balance sheets.  The fair values below are gross values before netting agreements and netting of cash collateral.
 December 31
 2016 2015
 
Notional
Contract
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Notional
Contract
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Great Plains Energy(millions)
Non-hedging derivatives       
Futures contracts$
 $
 $26.6
 $(5.7)
Forward contracts9.8
 2.4
 15.6
 3.1
Transmission congestion rights3.7
 1.3
 5.6
 (0.5)
Interest rate swaps4,415.0
 79.3
 
 
KCP&L 
  
  
  
Non-hedging derivatives 
  
  
  
Futures contracts$
 $
 $0.9
 $(0.1)
Transmission congestion rights2.7
 0.9
 4.1
 (0.4)
The fair values of Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's open derivative positions and balance sheet classification are summarized in the following tables. The fair values below are gross values before netting agreements and netting of cash collateral.
Great Plains Energy         
 Balance Sheet Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
December 31, 2016Classification Fair Value Fair Value
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments  (millions) 
Commodity contractsDerivative instruments/Other  $4.3
   $0.6
 
Interest rate contractsDerivative instruments  79.3
   
 
          
December 31, 2015    
    
 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments   
    
 
Commodity contractsOther/Derivative instruments  $3.3
   $6.4
 
Table of Contents


KCP&L         
 Balance Sheet Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
December 31, 2016Classification Fair Value Fair Value
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments  (millions) 
Commodity contractsOther  $1.3
   $0.4
 
          
December 31, 2015    
    
 
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments   
    
 
Commodity contractsOther  $0.2
   $0.7
 
The following tables provide information regarding Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's offsetting of derivative assets and liabilities.
Great Plains Energy             
             Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position    
DescriptionGross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts Presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Net Amount
December 31, 2016(millions)
Derivative assets $83.6
   $(0.5)   $83.1
   $
   $
   $83.1
 
Derivative liabilities 0.6
   (0.5)   0.1
   
   
   0.1
 
December 31, 2015                       
Derivative assets $3.3
   $(0.2)   $3.1
   $
   $
   $3.1
 
Derivative liabilities 6.4
   (5.9)   0.5
   
   
   0.5
 
KCP&L                       
             Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position    
DescriptionGross Amounts Recognized Gross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amounts Presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Cash Collateral Net Amount
December 31, 2016(millions)
Derivative assets $1.3
   $(0.4)   $0.9
   $
   $
   $0.9
 
Derivative liabilities 0.4
   (0.4)   
   
   
   
 
December 31, 2015                       
Derivative assets $0.2
   $(0.2)   $
   $
   $
   $
 
Derivative liabilities 0.7
   (0.3)   0.4
   
   
   0.4
 
At December 31, 2015, Great Plains Energy had offset $5.7 million of cash collateral posted with counterparties against net derivative positions.
Table of Contents


See Note 21 for information regarding amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.
Great Plains Energy's accumulated OCI at December 31, 2016, includes $7.8 million that is expected to be reclassified to expenses over the next twelve months.  KCP&L's accumulated OCI at December 31, 2016, includes $7.5 million that is expected to be reclassified to expenses over the next twelve months.
The following tables summarize the amounts of gain (loss) recognized for the change in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.
Great Plains Energy      
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 2016 2015 2014
Location of Gain (Loss) (millions)
Electric revenues $3.5
 $(8.2) $(14.2)
Fuel and purchased power (2.7) (4.0) (3.4)
Interest charges 79.3
 
 
Regulatory asset 
 (6.8) (2.7)
Regulatory liability 1.3
 
 
Total $81.4
 $(19.0) $(20.3)
KCP&L      
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments 2016 2015 2014
Location of Gain (Loss) (millions)
Electric revenues $3.5
 $(8.2) $(14.2)
Fuel and purchased power 0.1
 1.5
 1.1
Regulatory asset 
 (0.5) (0.2)
Regulatory liability 1.0
 
 
Total $4.6
 $(7.2) $(13.3)
20. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad categories, giving the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  A definition of the various levels, as well as discussion of the various measurements within the levels, is as follows:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that Great Plains Energy and KCP&L have access to at the measurement date.  
Level 2 – Market-based inputs for assets or liabilities that are observable (either directly or indirectly) or inputs that are not observable but are corroborated by market data.  
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs, reflecting Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L record cash and cash equivalents and short-term borrowings on the balance sheet at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L record long-term debt on the balance sheet at amortized cost. The fair value of long-term debt is measured as a Level 2 liability and is based on quoted market prices, with the incremental borrowing rate for similar debt used to determine fair value if quoted market prices are not available. At
Table of Contents


December 31, 2016, the book value and fair value of Great Plains Energy's long-term debt, including current maturities, were $3.8 billion and $4.0 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2015, the book value and fair value of Great Plains Energy's long-term debt, including current maturities, were $3.7 billion and $4.0 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2016, the book value and fair value of KCP&L's long-term debt, including current maturities, were $2.6 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2015, the book value and fair value of KCP&L's long-term debt, including current maturities, were $2.6 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively.
The following tables include Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values below are gross values before netting arrangements and netting of cash collateral.
DescriptionDecember 31
2016
  Level 1  Level 2 Level 3
KCP&L (millions) 
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
               
Equity securities $153.9
   $153.9
   $
   $
 
Debt securities  
    
    
    
 
U.S. Treasury 27.8
   27.8
   
   
 
U.S. Agency 1.7
   
   1.7
   
 
State and local obligations 3.2
   
   3.2
   
 
Corporate bonds 32.4
   
   32.4
   
 
Foreign governments 0.1
   
   0.1
   
 
Cash equivalents 3.8
   3.8
   
   
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 222.9
   185.5
   37.4
   
 
Self-insured health plan trust (b)
               
Equity securities 0.9
   0.9
   
   
 
Debt securities 4.8
   0.1
   4.7
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents 5.6
   5.6
   
   
 
Total self-insured health plan trust 11.3
   6.6
   4.7
   
 
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 1.3
   
   
   1.3
 
 Total $235.5
   $192.1
   $42.1
   $1.3
 
Liabilities  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 0.4
   
   
   0.4
 
 Total $0.4
   $
   $
   $0.4
 
Other Great Plains Energy  
    
    
    
 
Assets  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments               
Commodity (c)
 $3.0
   $
   $2.2
   $0.8
 
Interest rate (d)
 79.3
   
   
   79.3
 
 Total $82.3
   $
   $2.2
   $80.1
 
Liabilities  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 0.2
   
   0.1
   0.1
 
 Total $0.2
   $
   $0.1
   $0.1
 
Great Plains Energy  
    
    
    
 
Assets  
    
    
    
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
 $222.9
   $185.5
   $37.4
   $
 
Self-insured health plan trust (b)
 11.3
   6.6
   4.7
   
 
Derivative instruments (c)(d)
 83.6
   
   2.2
   81.4
 
Total $317.8
   $192.1
   $44.3
   $81.4
 
Liabilities  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments (c)
 0.6
   
   0.1
   0.5
 
 Total $0.6
   $
   $0.1
   $0.5
 
Table of Contents


DescriptionDecember 31
2015
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
KCP&L (millions) 
Assets               
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
               
Equity securities $135.4
   $135.4
   $
   $
 
Debt securities  
    
    
    
 
U.S. Treasury 26.4
   26.4
   
   
 
U.S. Agency 1.8
   
   1.8
   
 
State and local obligations 4.0
   
   4.0
   
 
Corporate bonds 29.2
   
   29.2
   
 
Foreign governments 0.3
   
   0.3
   
 
Cash equivalents 3.6
   3.6
   
   
 
Total nuclear decommissioning trust 200.7
   165.4
   35.3
   
 
Self-insured health plan trust (b)
               
Equity securities 1.1
   1.1
   
   
 
Debt securities 7.3
   
   7.3
   
 
Cash and cash equivalents 5.2
   5.2
   
   
 
Total self-insured health plan trust 13.6
   6.3
   7.3
   
 
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 0.2
   
   
   0.2
 
Total $214.5
   $171.7
   $42.6
   $0.2
 
Liabilities               
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 0.7
   0.1
   
   0.6
 
Total $0.7
   $0.1
   $
   $0.6
 
Other Great Plains Energy  
    
    
    
 
Assets  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments - commodity (c)
 $3.1
   $
   $2.7
   $0.4
 
SERP rabbi trusts (e)
               
Equity securities 0.1
   0.1
   
   
 
 Total $3.2
   $0.1
   $2.7
  
$0.4
 
Liabilities  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments - commodity(c)
 5.7
   5.6
   
   0.1
 
 Total $5.7
   $5.6
   $
   $0.1
 
Great Plains Energy  
    
    
    
 
Assets  
    
    
    
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust (a)
 $200.7
   $165.4
   $35.3
   $
 
Self-insured health plan trust (b)
 13.6
   6.3
   7.3
   
 
Derivative instruments (c)
 3.3
   
   2.7
   0.6
 
SERP rabbi trusts (e)
 0.1
   0.1
   
   
 
Total $217.7
   $171.8
   $45.3
   $0.6
 
Liabilities  
    
    
    
 
Derivative instruments (c)
 6.4
   5.7
   
   0.7
 
 Total $6.4
   $5.7
   $
   $0.7
 
  December 31
  2018 2017
Assets: (millions)
Property, plant and equipment of variable interest entities, net $169.2
 $176.3
Liabilities:    
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities $30.3
 $28.5
Accrued interest(a)
 0.5
 0.7
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net 51.1
 81.4
(a) 
Fair value is basedIncluded in accrued interest on quoted market prices of the investments held by the fund and/or valuation models.  
(b)
Fair value is based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the trust. Debt securities classified as Level 1 are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities. Debt securities classified as Level 2 are comprised of corporate bonds, U.S. Agency, stateEvergy's and local obligations, and other asset-backed securities.
(c)
The fair value of commodity derivative instruments is estimated using market quotes, over-the-counter forward price and volatility curves and correlations among fuel prices, net of estimated credit risk. Derivative instruments classified as Level 1 represent exchange traded derivative instruments. Derivative instruments classified as Level 2 represent non-exchange traded derivative instruments valued using pricing models for which observable market data is available to corroborate the valuation inputs. Derivative instruments classified as Level 3 represent non-exchange traded derivative instruments valued using pricing models for which observable market data is not available to corroborate the valuation inputs and TCRs valued at the most recent auction price in the SPP Integrated Marketplace.
(d)
The fair value of interest rate derivative instruments is determined by calculating the net present value of expected payments and receipts under the interest rate swaps using observable market inputs including interest rates and LIBOR swap rates. As of December 31, 2016, the calculated net present value was discounted by a contingency factor of 0.35 that management believes is representative of what a market participant would use in valuing these instruments in order to account for the contingent nature of the settlement of these instruments. See Note 19 for more details on the interest rate swaps.Westar Energy's consolidated balance sheets.

TableAll of Contents


A decreasethe liabilities noted in the contingency factor would result in a higher fair value measurement. Management expects that the contingency factor will decrease as the Company obtains certain regulatory approvals connected with the anticipated acquisition of Westar and duetable above relate to the passage of time. Becausepurchase of the unobservable natureproperty, plant and equipment of the contingency factor,VIE. The assets of the interest rate derivativesVIE can be used only to settle obligations of the VIE and the VIE's debt holders have been classified as Level 3.

(e)
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) rabbi trusts also included $16.0 million and $16.6 million, respectively, of fixed income funds valued at NAV per share (or its equivalent) that are not categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fixed income fund invests primarily in intermediate and long-term debt securities, can be redeemed immediately and is not subjectno recourse to any restrictions on redemptions.
The following tables reconcile the beginninggeneral credit of Evergy and ending balances for all Level 3 assetsWestar Energy. Evergy and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Great Plains Energy   
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 Derivative Instruments
 2016 2015
 (millions)
Net asset (liability) at January 1$(0.1) $3.5
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses): 
  
included in electric revenue3.5
 (8.2)
included in fuel and purchased power expense0.8
 (1.5)
included in non-operating income11.3
 8.6
included in interest charges79.3
 
included in regulatory (asset) liability1.3
 (0.5)
Purchases0.3
 
Settlements(15.5) (2.0)
Net asset (liability) at December 31$80.9
 $(0.1)
Total unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31:   
included in non-operating income$0.1
 $(0.2)
included in interest charges79.3
 
included in regulatory (asset) liability1.3
 (0.5)

KCP&L   
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 Derivative Instruments
 2016 2015
 (millions)
Net asset (liability) at January 1$(0.4) $3.1
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses): 
  
included in electric revenue3.5
 (8.2)
included in regulatory (asset) liability1.0
 (0.4)
Purchases(0.3) (0.8)
Settlements(2.9) 5.9
Net asset (liability) at December 31$0.9
 $(0.4)
Total unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31:   
included in regulatory (asset) liability$1.0
 $(0.4)
Westar Energy have not provided financial or other support to the VIE and are not required to provide such support. Evergy and Westar Energy did not record any gain or loss upon the initial consolidation of the VIE.
Table of Contents


21. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following tables reflect the change in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.
Great Plains Energy            
  
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges(a)
 
Defined Benefit Pension Items(a)
  
Total(a)
 
  (millions)
2016            
Beginning balance January 1  $(10.1)   $(1.9)   $(12.0) 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications  
   (0.7)   (0.7) 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  5.6
   0.5
   6.1
 
Net current period other comprehensive income  5.6
   (0.2)   5.4
 
Ending balance December 31  $(4.5)   $(2.1)   $(6.6) 
2015            
Beginning balance January 1  $(15.8)   $(2.9)   $(18.7) 
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  
   0.6
   0.6
 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  5.7
   0.4
   6.1
 
Net current period other comprehensive income  5.7
   1.0
   6.7
 
Ending balance December 31  $(10.1)   $(1.9)   $(12.0) 
(a) Net of tax
KCP&L    
  
Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges(a)
  (millions)
2016    
Beginning balance January 1  $(9.6) 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  5.4
 
Net current period other comprehensive income  5.4
 
Ending balance December 31  $(4.2) 
2015    
Beginning balance January 1  $(14.9) 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss  5.3
 
Net current period other comprehensive income  5.3
 
Ending balance December 31  $(9.6) 
(a) Net of tax
Table of Contents


The following tables reflect the effect on certain line items of net income from amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.
Great Plains Energy      
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Affected Line Item in the Income Statement
  2016 2015  
  (millions)  
Gains and (losses) on cash flow hedges (effective portion)      
Interest rate contracts $(9.2) $(9.2) Interest charges
  (9.2) (9.2) Income before income tax expense and income from equity investments
  3.6
 3.5
 Income tax benefit
  $(5.6) $(5.7) Net income
Amortization of defined benefit pension items      
Net losses included in net periodic benefit costs $(0.8) $(0.7) Utility operating and maintenance expenses
  (0.8) (0.7) Income before income tax expense and income from equity investments
  0.3
 0.3
 Income tax benefit
  $(0.5) $(0.4) Net income
       
Total reclassifications, net of tax $(6.1) $(6.1) Net income
KCP&L      
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Affected Line Item in the Income Statement
  2016 2015  
  (millions)  
Gains and (losses) on cash flow hedges (effective portion)      
Interest rate contracts $(8.8) $(8.7) Interest charges
  (8.8) (8.7) Income before income tax expense
  3.4
 3.4
 Income tax benefit
Total reclassifications, net of tax $(5.4) $(5.3) Net income

Table of Contents


22.19. TAXES
Components of income tax expense are detailed in the following tables.
Great Plains Energy2016 2015 2014
Evergy2018 2017 2016
Current income taxes(millions)(millions)
Federal$0.3
 $(0.2) $0.4
$(67.4) $0.1
 $(1.0)
State0.7
 (1.1) (0.1)2.2
 0.4
 0.3
Total1.0
 (1.3) 0.3
(65.2) 0.5
 (0.7)
Deferred income taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal140.6
 96.9
 104.2
160.1
 122.8
 155.2
State29.5
 28.0
 21.6
(32.3) 30.7
 32.9
Total170.1
 124.9
 125.8
127.8
 153.5
 188.1
Noncurrent income taxes 
  
  
Federal
 
 (2.4)
State
 
 (0.5)
Foreign
 
 (6.1)
Total
 
 (9.0)
Investment tax credit          
Deferral2.5
 0.5
 
Amortization(1.4) (1.4) (1.4)(3.6) (2.8) (2.9)
Total1.1
 (0.9) (1.4)(3.6) (2.8) (2.9)
Income tax expense$172.2
 $122.7
 $115.7
$59.0
 $151.2
 $184.5
KCP&L2016 2015 2014
Westar Energy2018 2017 2016
Current income taxes(millions)(millions)
Federal$24.8
 $(18.7) $(9.4)$(0.3) $0.1
 $(1.0)
State4.7
 (3.4) (2.3)(1.8) 0.4
 0.3
Total29.5
 (22.1) (11.7)(2.1) 0.5
 (0.7)
Deferred income taxes 
  
  
 
  
  
Federal76.4
 81.9
 72.6
43.5
 122.8
 155.2
State17.0
 17.5
 15.8
(42.9) 30.7
 32.9
Total93.4
 99.4
 88.4
0.6
 153.5
 188.1
Investment tax credit          
Deferral
 0.5
 
Amortization(1.0) (1.0) (1.0)(2.8) (2.8) (2.9)
Total(1.0) (0.5) (1.0)(2.8) (2.8) (2.9)
Income tax expense$121.9
 $76.8
 $75.7
Income tax expense (benefit)$(4.3) $151.2
 $184.5
KCP&L2018 2017 2016
Current income taxes(millions)
Federal$29.8
 $37.4
 $24.8
State8.9
 8.3
 4.7
Total38.7
 45.7
 29.5
Deferred income taxes 
  
  
Federal(3.4) 74.7
 76.4
State53.0
 8.8
 17.0
Total49.6
 83.5
 93.4
Investment tax credit     
Amortization(1.0) (1.0) (1.0)
Total(1.0) (1.0) (1.0)
Income tax expense$87.3
 $128.2
 $121.9
Table of Contents


Effective Income Tax Rates
Effective income tax rates reflected in the financial statements and the reasons for their differences from the statutory federal rates are detailed in the following tables.
Great Plains Energy2016 2015 2014
Federal statutory income tax rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Differences between book and tax depreciation not normalized(0.1) 
 (0.7)
Amortization of investment tax credits(0.3) (0.4) (0.4)
Federal income tax credits(2.6) (4.1) (3.8)
State income taxes4.2
 4.0
 3.8
Changes in uncertain tax positions, net
 
 (1.7)
Transaction costs0.9
 
 
Valuation allowance
 1.5
 
Other0.2
 0.5
 0.1
Effective income tax rate37.3 % 36.5 % 32.3 %
Evergy2018 2017 2016
Federal statutory income tax21.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
COLI policies(1.9) (3.1) (4.2)
State income taxes4.9
 4.1
 4.0
Flow through depreciation for plant-related differences0.8
 2.3
 3.1
Federal tax credits(6.4) (6.9) (1.8)
Non-controlling interest(0.4) (0.9) (0.9)
AFUDC equity(0.1) (0.2) (0.8)
Amortization of federal investment tax credits(0.6) (0.6) (0.5)
Changes in uncertain tax positions, net0.1
 
 
Federal or state tax rate change(8.7) 2.5
 
Valuation allowance0.4
 0.3
 0.4
Stock compensation(0.4) (0.9) (0.5)
Officer compensation limitation1.2
 0.2
 
Other(0.2) (0.8) 
Effective income tax rate9.7 % 31.0 % 33.8 %

KCP&L2016 2015 2014
Federal statutory income tax rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Differences between book and tax depreciation not normalized(0.3) 
 (0.9)
Amortization of investment tax credits(0.3) (0.5) (0.4)
Federal income tax credits(3.1) (5.6) (5.6)
State income taxes4.1
 4.0
 3.7
Valuation allowance
 0.3
 
Other(0.2) 0.3
 
Effective income tax rate35.2 % 33.5 % 31.8 %
Westar Energy2018 2017 2016
Federal statutory income tax21.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
COLI policies(3.3) (3.1) (4.2)
State income taxes5.0
 4.1
 4.0
Flow through depreciation for plant-related differences1.6
 2.3
 3.1
Federal tax credits(10.4) (6.9) (1.8)
Non-controlling interest(0.6) (0.9) (0.9)
AFUDC equity(0.2) (0.2) (0.8)
Amortization of federal investment tax credits(0.8) (0.6) (0.5)
Changes in uncertain tax positions, net0.1
 
 
Federal or state tax rate change(15.3) 2.5
 
Valuation allowance0.5
 0.3
 0.4
Stock compensation(0.8) (0.9) (0.5)
Officer compensation limitation1.8
 0.2
 
Other0.2
 (0.8) 
Effective income tax rate(1.2)% 31.0 % 33.8 %
Table of Contents


KCP&L2018 2017 2016
Federal statutory income tax21.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
COLI policies(0.2) (0.3) (0.2)
State income taxes5.5
 3.8
 4.1
Flow through depreciation for plant-related differences(2.5) 0.5
 0.3
Federal tax credits(2.1) (2.4) (3.1)
AFUDC equity(0.1) (0.7) (0.7)
Amortization of federal investment tax credits(0.4) (0.3) (0.3)
Federal or state tax rate change14.1
 5.3
 
Valuation allowance
 0.4
 
Stock compensation
 0.2
 
Officer compensation limitation0.6
 0.1
 0.2
Other(1.0) 
 (0.1)
Effective income tax rate34.9 % 41.6 % 35.2 %
Deferred Income Taxes
The tax effects of major temporary differences resulting in deferred income tax assets (liabilities) in the consolidated balance sheets areis in the following tables.table.
  Great Plains Energy KCP&L
December 31 2016 2015 2016 2015
Noncurrent deferred income taxes        
Plant related (2,107.6) (1,967.0) (1,492.2) (1,398.9)
Income taxes on future regulatory recoveries (148.7) (151.3) (123.9) (125.0)
Derivative instruments (17.0) 20.5
 8.5
 14.0
Pension and post-retirement benefits 10.5
 (0.1) 38.6
 27.4
SO2 emission allowance sales
 24.1
 25.7
 24.1
 25.7
Fuel recovery mechanisms (22.3) (4.5) (27.2) (6.3)
Tax credit carryforwards 271.1
 256.8
 177.4
 166.6
Customer demand programs (34.3) (22.7) (21.8) (16.9)
Solar rebates (27.3) (31.9) (11.4) (13.1)
Net operating loss carryforward 718.0
 734.9
 198.3
 204.2
Other 20.2
 0.7
 1.3
 (9.6)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax liability before valuation allowance (1,313.3) (1,138.9) (1,228.3) (1,131.9)
Valuation allowance (16.4) (19.9) 
 (0.7)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax liability (1,329.7) (1,158.8) (1,228.3) (1,132.6)
 December 31
 2018 2017
 Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L Evergy Westar Energy 
KCP&L(a)
Deferred tax assets:(millions)
Tax credit carryforward$508.1
 $307.1
 $194.0
 $276.7
 $276.7
 $185.8
Income taxes refundable to customers, net478.1
 233.1
 186.9
 230.3
 230.3
 179.1
Deferred employee benefit costs215.4
 89.6
 118.3
 95.9
 95.9
 124.6
Net operating loss carryforward383.3
 60.7
 119.2
 70.0
 70.0
 131.2
Deferred state income taxes62.5
 62.5
 
 63.8
 63.8
 
Alternative minimum tax carryforward73.4
 26.7
 
 52.2
 52.2
 
Accrued liabilities82.6
 13.6
 32.8
 13.2
 13.2
 26.0
Other193.5
 101.7
 46.7
 97.9
 97.9
 35.7
Total deferred tax assets before valuation
   allowance
1,996.9
 895.0
 697.9
 900.0
 900.0
 682.4
Valuation allowances(27.3) (1.7) 
 
 
 
Total deferred tax assets, net1,969.6
 893.3
 697.9
 900.0
 900.0
 682.4
Deferred tax liabilities:           
Plant-related(3,164.9) (1,491.6) (1,199.7) (1,483.3) (1,483.3) (1,127.0)
Deferred employee benefit costs(199.9) (89.6) (86.1) (95.9) (95.9) (96.0)
Acquisition premium(72.6) (72.6) 
 (76.6) (76.6) 
Other(131.4) (54.9) (43.9) (59.9) (59.9) (75.5)
Total deferred tax liabilities(3,568.8) (1,708.7) (1,329.7) (1,715.7) (1,715.7) (1,298.5)
Net deferred income tax liabilities$(1,599.2) $(815.4) $(631.8) $(815.7) $(815.7) $(616.1)
  Great Plains Energy KCP&L
December 31 2016 2015 2016 2015
  (millions)
Gross deferred income tax assets $1,360.9
 $1,368.5
 $747.7
 $740.9
Gross deferred income tax liabilities (2,690.6) (2,527.3) (1,976.0) (1,873.5)
Net deferred income tax liability $(1,329.7) $(1,158.8) $(1,228.3) $(1,132.6)
(a)
KCP&L amounts are not included in consolidated Evergy at December 31, 2017.
Tax Credit Carryforwards
At December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, Great PlainsEvergy had $333.8 million and $100.0 million, respectively, of federal general business income tax credit carryforwards.  At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Westar Energy had $183.5$134.0 million and $169.2$100.0 million,, respectively, of federal general business income tax credit carryforwards. At December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, KCP&L had $177.4$192.8 million and $166.6$184.6 million,, respectively, of federal general business income tax credit carryforwards.  The carryforwards for both Great PlainsEvergy, Westar Energy and KCP&L relate primarily to Advanced Coal Investment Tax Creditswind


production tax credits and Wind Productionadvanced coal investment tax credits and expire in the years 20282020 to 2036.2038. Approximately $0.5$0.5 million of Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's credits are related to Low Income Housing credits that were acquired in the GMO acquisition.Great Plains Energy's acquisition of GMO.  Due to federal limitations on the utilization of income tax attributes acquired in the GMO acquisition, managementEvergy expects a portion of these credits to expire unutilized and has provided a valuation allowance against $0.4$0.4 million of the federal income tax benefit.
The year of origin of Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's related tax benefit amounts for federal tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2018 are detailed in the following table.
  Amount of Benefit 
Year of Origin Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L 
  (millions) 
2000 $7.3
 $7.3
 $
 
2001 9.8
 9.7
 
 
2002 0.3
 0.2
 
 
2003 0.3
 0.2
 
 
2004 0.3
 0.2
 
 
2005 0.3
 0.2
 
 
2006 0.3
 0.2
 
 
2007 0.6
 0.5
 
 
2008 39.8
 0.5
 38.9
 
2009 47.7
 0.2
 47.4
 
2010 18.3
 
 18.2
 
2011 13.3
 
 13.2
 
2012 13.7
 2.9
 10.7
 
2013 23.5
 10.5
 12.9
 
2014 23.6
 10.2
 13.0
 
2015 23.5
 10.1
 12.8
 
2016 26.1
 10.1
 12.4
 
2017 43.3
 34.5
 8.2
 
2018 41.8
 36.5
 5.1
 
  $333.8
 $134.0
 $192.8
 
At December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, Great Plains EnergyEvergy had $87.6$73.4 million and $52.2 million of federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards, allcarryforwards. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Westar Energy had $26.7 million and $52.2 million of which was acquired in the GMO acquisition.federal AMT carryforwards.  These credits do not expire and can be used to reduce taxes paid in the future.future or become refundable starting in 2018. Due to potential federal budget sequestration reductions for refundable income tax credits, Evergy expects a portion of these credits will not be refunded and has provided a valuation allowance against $7.9 million of the federal income tax benefit.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Evergy had $174.3 million and $176.7 million, respectively, of tax benefits related to state income tax credit carryforwards. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, Westar Energy had $173.1 million and $176.7 million, respectively, of tax benefit related to state income tax credit carryforwards. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, KCP&L had $1.2 million of tax benefits related to state income tax credit carryforwards. The state income tax credits relate primarily to the Kansas high performance incentive program tax credits and expire in the years 2024 to 2033.
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
At December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, Great Plains EnergyEvergy had $643.8$324.2 million and $656.1$38.0 million,, respectively, of tax benefits related to federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards.  Approximately $306.2 million at At December 31, 20162018 and $313.22017, Westar Energy had $40.1


million and $38.0 million, respectively, of tax benefits related to federal NOL carryforwards. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, KCP&L had $107.5 million and $107.3 million, respectively, of tax benefits related to federal NOL carryforwards. Approximately $78.1 million at December 31, 20182015, respectively, are tax benefits related to NOLs that were acquired in the GMO acquisition. TheDue to federal limitations on the utilization of income tax benefits for NOLs originatingattributes acquired in 2003 are $23.0the GMO acquisition, Evergy expects a portion of these credits to expire unutilized and has provided a valuation allowance against $7.1 million, $152.4 million originating in 2004, $74.1 million originating in 2005, $53.3 million originating in 2006, $1.3 million originating in 2007, $2.4 million originating in 2008, $36.5 million originating in 2009, $4.1 million originating in 2010, $108.8 million


originating in 2011, $2.1 million originating in 2012, $1.4 million originating in 2013, $86.3 million originating in 2014 and $98.1 million originating in 2015.the federal income tax benefit. The federal NOL carryforwards expire in years 20232022 to 2036.2037.  
The year of origin of Evergy's, Westar Energy's and KCP&L's related tax benefit amounts for federal NOL carryforwards as of December 31, 2018 are detailed in the following table.
  Amount of Benefit 
Year of Origin Evergy Westar Energy KCP&L 
  (millions) 
2004 $1.6
 $
 $
 
2005 44.4
 
 
 
2006 32.0
 
 
 
2009 21.9
 
 
 
2010 2.5
 
 
 
2011 65.3
 
 38.4
 
2012 0.2
 0.2
 
 
2013 1.5
 0.8
 0.3
 
2014 77.2
 25.0
 12.3
 
2015 59.3
 0.2
 55.6
 
2016 0.8
 0.4
 0.3
 
2017 16.2
 12.3
 0.6
 
2018 1.3
 1.2
 
 
  $324.2
 $40.1
 $107.5
 
In addition, Great Plains EnergyEvergy also had deferred tax benefits of $74.2$59.1 millionand $78.8$26.0 million related to state NOLs as of December 31, 20162018 and 20152017, respectively.  Of these amounts, approximately $36.1Westar Energy had deferred tax benefits of $20.6 million and $39.2$26.0 million at related to state NOLs as of December 31, 20162018 and 2015, respectively, were acquired2017, respectively. KCP&L had deferred tax benefits of $11.7 million and $23.9 million related to state NOLs as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The state NOL carryforwards expire in the GMO acquisition.  Managementyears 2019 to 2037. Evergy does not expect to utilize $16.0$11.9 million of NOLs before the expiration date of the carryforwards of NOLs in state tax jurisdictions where the Company does not expect to operate in the future.certain states. Therefore, a valuation allowance has been provided against $16.0$11.9 million of state tax benefits.
Valuation Allowances
Great Plains EnergyEvergy is required to assess the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets using a “more"more likely than not”not" assessment threshold.  This assessment takes into consideration tax planning strategies within Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's control.  As a result of this assessment, Great Plains EnergyEvergy has established a partial valuation allowance for federal and state tax NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. During 2016, $3.52018, $0.5 million of tax expense was recorded in continuing operations primarily related to AMT credits offset by the tax benefit recorded for the expiration of certain state NOL carryforwards. The remaining valuation allowances against federal and state NOL carryforwards that expired atand tax credit carryforwards were acquired as part of the merger and were recorded as part of the purchase accounting entries.
Federal Tax Reform
In December 31, 2016.
23. SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
Great Plains Energy has one reportable segment based on its method of internal reporting, which segregates reportable segments based on products2017, the U.S. Congress passed and services, management responsibilityPresident Donald Trump signed Public Law No. 115-97, commonly referred to as the TCJA. The TCJA represents the first major reform in U.S. income tax law since 1986. Most notably, the TCJA reduces the current top corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018, repeals the corporate AMT, makes existing AMT tax credit carryforwards refundable, and regulation.  The one reportable business segment is electric utility, consisting of KCP&L, GMO's regulated utility operations and GMO Receivables Company.  Other includes GMO activity other than its regulated utility operations, GPETHC and unallocated corporate charges, including certain costs to achievechanges the anticipated acquisition of Westar.  The summary of significant accounting policies applies to the reportable segment.  Segment performance is evaluated based on net income.
The following tables reflect summarized financial information concerning Great Plains Energy's reportable segment.
2016
Electric
Utility
 Other Eliminations 
Great Plains
Energy
  (millions)
Operating revenues $2,676.0
   $
   $
   $2,676.0
 
Depreciation and amortization (344.8)   
   
   (344.8) 
Interest charges (196.1)   2.5
   32.1
   (161.5) 
Income tax expense (164.3)   (7.9)   
   (172.2) 
Net income (loss) 292.1
   (2.1)   
   290.0
 
2015
Electric
Utility
 Other Eliminations 
Great Plains
Energy
  (millions)
Operating revenues $2,502.2
   $
   $
   $2,502.2
 
Depreciation and amortization (330.4)   
   
   (330.4) 
Interest charges (190.9)   (40.5)   32.1
   (199.3) 
Income tax expense (120.8)   (1.9)   
   (122.7) 
Net income (loss) 223.8
   (10.8)   
   213.0
 
deductibility


and taxability of certain items, among other things. Prior to the change in tax rates that has been reflected in their 2018 rate cases, Westar Energy, KCP&L and GMO recovered the cost of income taxes in rates from their customers based on the 35% federal corporate income tax rate.
2014
Electric
Utility
 Other Eliminations 
Great Plains
Energy
  (millions)
Operating revenues $2,568.2
   $
   $
   $2,568.2
 
Depreciation and amortization (306.0)   
   
   (306.0) 
Interest charges (183.0)   (41.2)   35.7
   (188.5) 
Income tax (expense) benefit (125.6)   9.9
   
   (115.7) 
Net income (loss) 243.5
   (0.7)   
   242.8
 
 
Electric
Utility
 Other Eliminations 
Great Plains
Energy
2016 (millions) 
Assets $11,444.2
   $2,461.3
   $(335.5)   $13,570.0
 
Capital expenditures 609.4
   
   
   609.4
 
2015  
    
    
    
 
Assets $11,045.5
   $(51.1)   $(255.8)   $10,738.6
 
Capital expenditures 677.1
   
   
   677.1
 
2014               
Assets $10,727.7
   $29.2
   $(303.5)   $10,453.4
 
Capital expenditures 773.7
   
   
   773.7
 
24. JOINTLY-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANTS
Great Plains Energy'sIn January 2018, the KCC issued an order requiring certain regulated public utilities, including Westar Energy and KCP&L, to begin recording a regulatory liability for the difference between the new federal corporate tax rate and amounts currently collected in rates. In the second quarter of 2018, Westar Energy and KCP&L entered into settlement agreements with KCC staff and other intervenors in which they further agreed to begin deferring any impacts of the TCJA on their excess accumulated deferred income taxes to a regulatory liability. The KCC approved these settlement agreements in June 2018. KCP&L and GMO had also recorded regulatory liabilities in 2018 due to the probability that they would also be required to make similar refunds to their Missouri customers.
The final regulatory treatment of these regulatory liabilities was determined in each of Westar Energy's, KCP&L's shareand GMO's rate cases with the KCC and MPSC. See Note 5 for more information and the amounts of jointly-owned electric utility plants at December 31, 2016, are detailedthe regulatory liabilities recorded by the Evergy Companies.

Missouri Tax Reform
On June 1, 2018, the Missouri governor signed Senate Bill (S.B.) 884 into law. Most notably, S.B. 884 reduces the corporate income tax rate from 6.25% to 4.0% beginning in 2020, provides for the mandatory use of the single sales factor formula and eliminates intercompany transactions between corporations that file a consolidated Missouri income tax return.
As a result of the change in the following tables.Missouri corporate income tax rate, KCP&L revalued and restated its deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of June 1, 2018. KCP&L decreased its net deferred income tax liabilities by $46.6 million, primarily consisting of a $28.8 million adjustment for the revaluation and restatement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities included in Missouri jurisdictional rate base and a $9.9 million tax gross-up adjustment for ratemaking purposes. The decrease to KCP&L's net deferred income tax liabilities included in Missouri jurisdictional rate base were offset by a corresponding increase in regulatory liabilities. The net regulatory liabilities will be amortized to customers over a period to be determined in a future rate case.
KCP&L recognized $15.5 million of income tax benefit primarily related to the difference between KCP&L's revaluation of its deferred income tax assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amount of the revaluation pertaining to KCP&L's Missouri jurisdictional rate base.
Great Plains Energy                        
  Wolf Creek Unit La Cygne Units Iatan No. 1 Unit Iatan No. 2 Unit Iatan Common Jeffrey Energy Center
  (millions, except MW amounts)
Great Plains Energy's share  47%   50%   88%   73%   79%   8% 
                         
Utility plant in service  $1,853.1
   $1,099.5
   $670.2
   $1,334.9
   $490.6
   $196.1
 
Accumulated depreciation  889.6
   275.6
   261.6
   387.3
   126.3
   80.1
 
Nuclear fuel, net  62.0
   
   
   
   
   
 
Construction work in progress  83.5
   30.6
   19.9
   41.7
   22.1
   3.7
 
2017 accredited capacity-MWs  549
   699
   616
   641
   NA
   172
 
KCP&L                    
  Wolf Creek Unit La Cygne Units Iatan No. 1 Unit Iatan No. 2 Unit Iatan Common
  (millions, except MW amounts)
KCP&L's share  47%   50%   70%   55%   61% 
                     
Utility plant in service  $1,853.1
   $1,099.5
   $532.8
   $1,022.4
   $403.1
 
Accumulated depreciation  889.6
   275.6
   210.8
   346.6
   113.0
 
Nuclear fuel, net  62.0
   
   
   
   
 
Construction work in progress  83.5
   30.6
   8.4
   23.1
   5.0
 
2017 accredited capacity-MWs  549
   699
   490
   482
   NA
 



Each owner must fund its own portion of the plant's operating expenses and capital expenditures. KCP&L's and GMO's share of direct expenses are included in the appropriate operating expense classifications in Great Plains Energy's and KCP&L's financial statements.
25.20. QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
 Quarter Quarter
Great Plains Energy 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2016 (millions, except per share amounts)
Evergy 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2018 (millions, except per share amounts)
Operating revenue $572.1
 $670.8
 $856.8
 $576.3
 $600.2
 $893.4
 $1,582.5
 $1,199.8
Operating income 89.9
 182.3
 281.9
 64.8
 123.5
 126.9
 533.1
 150.1
Net income 26.4
 32.0
 133.6
 98.0
 62.9
 104.4
 357.6
 21.1
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc. 60.5
 101.8
 355.0
 18.5
Basic and diluted earnings per common share 0.17
 0.20
 0.86
 0.39
 0.42
 0.56
 1.32
 0.07
2015        
2017        
Operating revenue $549.1
 $609.0
 $781.4
 $562.7
 $572.6
 $609.3
 $794.3
 $594.8
Operating income 70.1
 119.9
 256.7
 83.4
 131.4
 160.2
 264.9
 122.3
Net income 18.9
 44.4
 126.8
 22.9
 63.5
 76.0
 160.7
 36.3
Net income attributable to Evergy, Inc. 59.7
 72.1
 158.3
 33.8
Basic and diluted earnings per common share 0.12
 0.28
 0.82
 0.15
 0.42
 0.50
 1.11
 0.24
 Quarter Quarter
KCP&L 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2016 (millions)
Westar Energy 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2018 (millions)
Operating revenue $400.9
 $475.6
 $597.6
 $401.3
 $600.2
 $650.9
 $764.8
 $599.0
Operating income 70.6
 137.9
 219.2
 54.4
 123.5
 76.1
 256.9
 94.0
Net income 24.6
 65.9
 117.7
 16.8
 62.9
 77.6
 178.0
 30.6
2015        
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc. 60.5
 75.0
 175.4
 28.0
2017        
Operating revenue $370.4
 $417.4
 $526.3
 $399.7
 $572.6
 $609.3
 $794.3
 $594.8
Operating income 45.3
 79.3
 170.8
 68.6
 131.4
 160.2
 264.9
 122.3
Net income 13.2
 29.4
 84.3
 25.9
 63.5
 76.0
 160.7
 36.3
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc. 59.7
 72.1
 158.3
 33.8
  Quarter
KCP&L 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
2018 (millions)
Operating revenue $397.1
 $452.2
 $559.6
 $414.2
Operating income 61.0
 114.7
 189.4
 44.7
Net income (loss) 20.2
 24.6
 120.3
 (2.2)
2017        
Operating revenue $395.9
 $482.7
 $595.7
 $416.4
Operating income 65.0
 126.2
 219.8
 75.4
Net income 14.2
 49.6
 114.1
 1.9
Quarterly data is subject to seasonal fluctuations with peak periods occurring in the summer months.


Evergy's results reflect the results of operations of Westar Energy for all periods in 2017. Evergy had separate operations and includes the results of operation of KCP&L and GMO beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2018. See Note 1 for more information.
Table of Contents


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
GREAT PLAINS ENERGYEVERGY
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Great Plains EnergyEvergy carried out an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) orand 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)).  This evaluation was conducted under the supervision, and with the participation, of Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and Great Plains Energy'sEvergy's disclosure committee.  Based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Great Plains EnergyEvergy have concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that the disclosure controls and procedures of Great Plains EnergyEvergy were effective at a reasonable assurance level. 
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in Great Plains Energy'sEvergy’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016,2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for Evergy.  Under the supervision and with the participation of Evergy’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of Evergy’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.  Management used for this evaluation the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for Great Plains Energy.  Under the supervision and with the participation of Great Plains Energy's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of Great Plains Energy's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.  Management used for this evaluation the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.

Management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy's2018, Evergy’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework.  Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K, has issued its attestation report on Great Plains Energy'sEvergy’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included below.

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Evergy, Inc.
Great Plains Energy Incorporated
Kansas City, MissouriOpinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016,2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, of the Company and our report dated February 21, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.
Basis for Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated February 23, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 23, 201721, 2019


Table of Contents


KCP&LWESTAR ENERGY
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
KCP&LWestar Energy carried out an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) orand 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act).  This evaluation was conducted under the supervision, and with the participation, of KCP&L'sWestar Energy's management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and KCP&L'sWestar Energy's disclosure committee.  Based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of KCP&LWestar Energy have concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that the disclosure controls and procedures of KCP&LWestar Energy were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in KCP&L'sWestar Energy's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016,2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for Westar Energy.  Under the supervision and with the participation of Westar Energy’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of Westar Energy’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. Management used for this evaluation the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO of the Treadway Commission.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, Westar Energy’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework.  
KCP&L
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
KCP&L carried out an evaluation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act).  This evaluation was conducted under the supervision, and with the participation, of KCP&L's management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and KCP&L's disclosure committee.  Based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of KCP&L have concluded as of the end of the period covered by this report that the disclosure controls and procedures of KCP&L were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in KCP&L's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for KCP&L.  Under the supervision and with the participation of KCP&L's&L’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of KCP&L's&L’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.2018.  Management used for
Table of Contents


this evaluation the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO of the Treadway Commission.
Management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, KCP&L's internal control over financial reporting is effective based on the criteria set forth in the COSO framework.  Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K, has issued its attestation report on KCP&L's internal control over financial reporting, which is included below.
Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Kansas City Power & Light Company
Kansas City, Missouri
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Kansas City Power & Light Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effectiveManagement has concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, KCP&L’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,is effective based on the criteria establishedset forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.COSO framework.  
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated February 23, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 23, 2017



ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION
On February 21, 2017, Scott H. Heidtbrink, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of KCP&L and GMO, informed the companies of his decision to retire from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer effective upon the closing of Great Plains Energy's anticipated acquisition of Westar.None.
PART III
Information required by Items 10-14 of Part III of this Form 10-K with respect to Evergy will be incorporated by reference to Evergy's definitive proxy statement with respect to its 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Proxy Statement), which will be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2019.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Great Plains Energy DirectorsEvergy
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the Great Plains Energy 2017Proxy Statement (Proxy Statement), which will be filed withfor the SEC no later than March 23, 2017:2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
Information regarding the directors of Great Plains Energy required by this itemEvergy is contained in the Proxy Statement section titled “Election"Election of Directors."
Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 required by this item is contained in the Proxy Statement section titled “Security"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Officers - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance."
Information regarding the Audit Committee of Great Plains Energy required by this itemEvergy is contained in the Proxy Statement section titled “Corporate"Corporate Governance - Committees of the Board."
Great Plains Energy and KCP&L Executive OfficersInformation regarding Evergy's Code of Ethical Business Conduct is contained in the Proxy Statement section titled "Corporate Governance - Code of Ethical Business Conduct."
Information required by this item regarding theEvergy's executive officers of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L is contained in this report in the Part I, Item 1 section titled “Executivein "Executive Officers."
Great PlainsWestar Energy and KCP&L Code of Ethical Business Conduct
The Companies have adopted a Code of Ethical Business Conduct (Code), which applies to all directors, officers and employees of Great Plains Energy, KCP&L and their subsidiaries.  The Code is posted on the corporate governance page of the Internet websites at www.greatplainsenergy.com and www.kcpl.com.  A copy of the Code is available, without charge, upon written request to Corporate Secretary, Great Plains Energy Incorporated, 1200 Main St., Kansas City, Missouri 64105.  Great Plains Energy and KCP&L intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of the Code that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller of those companies by posting such information on the corporate governance page of the Internet websites.
Other KCP&L Information
The other information required by this item regarding Westar Energy and KCP&L has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction (I). to Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
The information required by this item contained in the sections titled “Executive"Executive Compensation,” “Director" "Director Compensation,” “Compensation" "Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis", “Compensation"Compensation Committee Report”Report" and “Director "Director


Independence - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation”Participation" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
Westar Energy and KCP&L
The otherOther information required by this item regarding Westar Energy and KCP&L has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction (I). to Form 10-K.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
The information required by this item regarding security ownership of the directors and executive officers of Great Plains EnergyEvergy contained in the section titled “Security"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Officers”Officers" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
Westar Energy and KCP&L
The information required by this item regarding Westar Energy and KCP&L has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction (I). to Form 10-K.
Equity Compensation Plans
Upon the consummation of the merger, Evergy assumed both Westar Energy's LTISA and Great Plains Energy's Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, is an equity compensation plan approved by its shareholders.which was renamed the Evergy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. The renamed Evergy Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, bonus shares, stock options, stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights, director shares, director deferred share units, and performance shares and other stock-based awards to directors, officers and other employees of Great Plains Energy and KCP&L.Evergy.

KCP&L does not have an equity compensation plan; however, KCP&L officers and certain employees participate in Great Plains Energy's Long-Term Incentive Plan.
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2016,2018, regarding the number of common shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights, their weighted average exercise price, and the number of shares of common stock remaining available for future issuance. The table excludes shares issued or issuable under Great Plains Energy'sany defined contribution savings plans.
     Number of securities     Number of securities
Number of   remaining availableNumber of   remaining available
securities   for future issuancesecurities   for future issuance
to be issued upon Weighted-average under equityto be issued upon Weighted-average under equity
exercise of exercise price of compensation plansexercise of exercise price of compensation plans
outstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securitiesoutstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securities
warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a))warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a))
Plan Category(a) (b) (c)(a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)              
Great Plains Energy Long-Term Incentive Plan 763,687
(1) 
 $
(2) 
 4,239,813
 
Evergy Long-Term Incentive Plan 530,359
(2) 
 $
(3) 
 2,168,693
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Total 763,687
(1) 
 $
(2) 
 4,239,813
  530,359
(2) 
 $
(3) 
 2,168,693
 
(1)The Westar Energy, Inc. Long-Term Incentive and Share Award Plan will not be used for future awards. As of December 31, 2018, there were approximately 134,538 time-based restricted stock units outstanding under the plan, and approximately 362,324 units outstanding that were deferred pursuant to the Westar Energy, Inc. non-employee deferred compensation program. Deferred units will continue to receive deferred dividend equivalents in the form of additional deferred units until payouts pursuant to elections begin.
(2)Includes 348,496 performance shares at target performance levels, 82,331 time-based restricted share units and director deferred share units for 99,532 shares of Evergy common stock outstanding at December 31, 2018.
(3)The performance shares, time-based restricted share units and director deferred share units have no exercise price and therefore are not reflected in the weighted average exercise price.
(1)
Includes 625,100 performance shares at target performance levels and director deferred share units for 138,587 shares of Great Plains Energy common stock outstanding at December 31, 2016.
(2)
The performance shares and director deferred share units have no exercise price and therefore are not reflected in the weighted average exercise price.
Table of Contents


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
The information required by this item contained in the sections titled “Director Independence”"Director Independence" and “Related"Related Party Transactions”Transactions" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
Westar Energy and KCP&L
The information required by this item regarding Westar Energy and KCP&L has been omitted in reliance on General Instruction (I). to Form 10-K.


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
The information required by this item regarding the independent auditors of Great Plains EnergyEvergy and its subsidiaries contained in the section titled “Ratification"Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors”Auditors" of the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
Westar Energy and KCP&L
The Audit Committee of the Great Plains EnergyEvergy Board functions as the Audit Committee of Westar Energy and KCP&L. The following table setstables set forth the aggregate fees billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for audit services rendered in connection with the consolidated financial statements and reports for 20162018 and 20152017 and for other services rendered during 20162018 and 20152017 on behalf of Westar Energy and KCP&L, as well as all out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with these services:
Westar Energy20182017
Fee Category20162015 
Audit Fees$1,184,550
$1,201,819
$2,168,000
$2,691,000
Audit-Related Fees21,000
20,000
40,000
54,000
Tax Fees24,822
5,751


All Other Fees
8,802


Total Fees$1,230,372
$1,236,372
$2,208,000
$2,745,000
KCP&L20182017
Fee Category  
Audit Fees$1,801,396
$1,304,550
Audit-Related Fees23,000
22,000
Tax Fees34,765
24,905
All Other Fees

Total Fees$1,859,161
$1,351,455
Audit Fees: Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of the annual consolidated financial statements of Westar Energy and KCP&L and reviews of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports. Audit fees also include: services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; audit reports on audits of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and other attest services, except those not required by statute or regulation; services related to filings with the SEC, including comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC; and accounting research in support of the audit.


Audit-Related Fees: Consists of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of consolidated financial statements of Westar Energy and KCP&L and are not reported under “Audit Fees”."Audit Fees." These services include consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
Tax Fees: Consists of fees billed for tax compliance and related support of tax returns and other tax services, including assistance with tax audits, and tax research and planning.
All Other Fees: Consists of fees for all other services other than those described above.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of all audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm for Westar Energy and KCP&L.  The Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax or other services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Under these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee may pre-approve certain types of services, up to the aggregate fee levels it sets. Any proposed service within a pre-approved type of service that would cause the applicable fee level to be exceeded cannot be provided unless the Audit Committee either amends the applicable fee level or specifically approves the proposed service. The Audit Committee, as well, may specifically approve audit, audit-related, tax or other services on a case-by-case basis. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period. The CompanyManagement provides quarterly updates to the Audit Committee regarding actual fees spent with respect to pre-approved services.  The ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee may pre-approve audit, audit-related, tax and other services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm as required between meetings and report such pre-approval at the next Audit Committee meeting.



PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements


Financial Statement Schedules


Exhibits 
Exhibit
Number 
 
 
Description of Document
 
 
Registrant
     
2.1*

 Evergy
Westar Energy
2.2*∆Evergy
Westar Energy
     
3.1*

 Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
3.2*

 Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
3.3*
Amended and Restated By-laws of Great Plains Energy Incorporated, as amended December 10, 2013 (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2013).

Great Plains Energy
3.4*Amended and Restated Articles of Consolidation of Kansas City Power & Light Company, restated as of May 6, 2014 (Exhibit 3.2 to KCP&L's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014). KCP&L
     
3.53.4* KCP&L
     
3.5*Westar Energy
3.6*Westar Energy
4.1* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.2* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.3* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     




Evergy
     
4.74.9* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.84.10* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.94.11*Evergy
4.12* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.104.13* Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
4.114.14* 
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
KCP&L


KCP&L
     
4.124.15* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.134.16*Evergy
KCP&L
4.17* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.144.18* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.154.19* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.164.20* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.174.21* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     


4.184.22* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.194.23* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.204.24* 
Great Plains EnergyEvergy
KCP&L


KCP&L
     
4.214.25* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.224.26* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.234.27* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.244.28* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.254.29* 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.264.30*

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.274.31*


 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
4.284.32*Evergy
KCP&L
4.33*Evergy
KCP&L
4.34*

 Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
10.1*+Great Plains Energy Incorporated Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, effective on May 7, 2002 (Exhibit 10.1.a to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002).4.35 
KCP&L
 Evergy
Westar Energy


10.2*+
4.36



 
Great PlainsEvergy
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
10.3*+Great Plains Energy Incorporated Amended Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended effective on May 3, 2011 (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2011).4.37 
KCP&L
Evergy
Westar Energy
     
10.44.38*+ 
Great PlainsEvergy
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
10.54.39Evergy
Westar Energy
4.40Evergy
Westar Energy
4.41*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.42*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.43*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.44*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.45*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.46*Evergy
Westar Energy


4.47*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.48*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.49*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.50*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.51*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.52*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.53*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.54*Evergy
Westar Energy
4.55*Evergy
Westar Energy
10.1*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.6*+Great Plains Energy Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards Standards and Performance Criteria Effective as of January 1, 2013 (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.710.2*+
Great Plains Energy Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards Standards and Performance Criteria Effective as of January 1, 2014 (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).






Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.8
*+

Great Plains Energy Incorporated Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards Standards and Performance Criteria Effective as of January 1, 2015 (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L

10.9*+


 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
10.10*+
Form of 2013 three-year Performance Share Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).

Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.11*+Form of 2013 Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.12*+
Form of 2014 three-year Performance Share Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).

Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.13*+
Form of 2014 Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014).

Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.14*+
Form of 2015 three-year Performance Share Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).


Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.15*+
Form of 2015 Restricted Stock Agreement (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).


Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.16*+
Form of 2016 three-year Performance Share Agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016).

Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
     


10.1710.3*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.4*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.5*+

 Evergy
KCP&L
10.6+Evergy
KCP&L
10.7*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.8*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.9+Evergy
KCP&L
10.10*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.11*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.12+Evergy
KCP&L
10.13*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.14*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.15*+Evergy
KCP&L


10.16*+Evergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
10.17*+Evergy
Westar Energy
     
10.18*+

 
Great PlainsEvergy
Westar Energy


     
10.19*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.20*+

 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
10.21*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.22*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.23*+ 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.24*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.25*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.26*+Evergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
10.27*+Evergy
KCP&L


10.28*+Evergy
Westar Energy
10.29*+


 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.2710.30*+ 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.2810.31*+

 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.2910.32*+Evergy
KCP&L
10.33*+Evergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
10.34*+Evergy
Westar Energy
10.35+ 
Great PlainsEvergy
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     


10.3010.36*+ 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L
     
10.3110.37*+
*+

Great Plains Energy Incorporated Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated for I.R.C. §409A), amended effective January 1, 2010 (Exhibit 10.1.5 to Great Plains Energy's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010). 
Great Plains Energy
Evergy
KCP&L

     
10.3210.38*+Joint Motion 
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.33*Credit Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2010, among Great Plains Energy Incorporated, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents, Barclays Bank PLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents, Banc of America Securities LLC, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).Great PlainsEvergy
Westar Energy
     
10.3410.39*+First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2011, among Great Plains Energy Incorporated, Certain Lenders, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Barclays Bank PLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.59 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011). Great Plains Energy
10.35*Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2013, among Great Plains Energy Incorporated, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).Great Plains Energy
10.36*First Extension Agreement and Waiver, dated as of December 17, 2014, among Great Plains Energy Incorporated, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and an Issuer, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.37 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
     


10.3710.40*+

 Great Plains Energy
10.38*Credit Agreement, dated as of August 9, 2010, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Documentation Agents, Banc of America Securities LLC, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.39*First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2011, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Certain Lenders, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Documentation Agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.61 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.40*Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2013, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
Evergy
     
10.41*First Extension 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     


10.42* 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy

     
10.43*First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2011, among KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, Great Plains Energy Incorporated, as Guarantor, Certain Lenders, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agents, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and BNP Paribas, as Documentation Agents, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Union Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.63 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).Great Plains Energy
10.44*Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2013, among KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013).Great Plains Energy
10.45*First Extension Agreement and Waiver, dated as of December 17, 2014, among KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, Certain Lenders, Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and an Issuer, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, and MUFG Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Managers (Exhibit 10.45 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).Great Plains Energy
10.46* Great PlainsEvergy
21.1Evergy
21.2Westar Energy
     
10.47*Insurance Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005, between Kansas City Power & Light Company and XL Capital Assurance Inc. (Exhibit 10.2.e to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).23.1 
KCP&L
Evergy
     
10.48*Insurance Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005, between Kansas City Power & Light Company and XL Capital Assurance Inc. (Exhibit 10.2.f to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005).23.2 
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L


10.49*Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated asConsent of July 1, 2005, between Kansas City Power & Light Company, as Originator, and Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, as Buyer (Exhibit 10.2.b to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.50*Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2005, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, as the Seller, Kansas City Power & Light Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent, and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.2.c to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.51*Amendment No. 1, dated as of April 2, 2007, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation to the Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.52*Amendment No. 2, dated as of July 11, 2008, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation to the Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.53*Amendment, dated as of July 9, 2009, to Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2009).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.54*Amendment and Waiver, dated as of September 25, 2009, to the Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.2.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.55*Amendment, dated as of May 5, 2010, to Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.2.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.56*Amendment, dated as of February 23, 2011, to Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005 among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation. (Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L


10.57*Amendment, dated as of September 9, 2011, to Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, Kansas City Power & Light Company, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2011).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.58*Amendment dated as of September 9, 2014, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, as the Seller, Kansas City Power & Light Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2014).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.59*Amendment dated as of September 9, 2015, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, as the Seller, Kansas City Power & Light Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2015).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.60
*

Amendment dated as of September 9, 2016, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, among Kansas City Power & Light Receivables Company, as the Seller, Kansas City Power & Light Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 13, 2016).

Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.61*
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, between KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, as Originator, and GMO Receivables Company, as Buyer (Exhibit 10.2. to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).

Great Plains Energy
10.62*Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, among GMO Receivables Company, as the Seller, KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent, and Victory Receivables Corporation (Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).Great Plains Energy
10.63*First Amendment dated as of September 9, 2014, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of May 31, 2012, among GMO Receivables Company, as the Seller, KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2014).Great Plains Energy
10.64*Second Amendment dated as of September 9, 2015, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of May 31, 2012, among GMO Receivables Company, as the Seller, KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2015).Great Plains Energy


10.65*
Third Amendment dated as of September 9, 2016, to the Receivables Sales Agreement dated as of May 31, 2012, among GMO Receivables Company, as the Seller, KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, as the Initial Collection Agent, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch, as the Agent and Victory Receivables Corporation, as the Purchaser (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed September 13, 2016).

Great Plains Energy
10.66*Iatan Unit 2 and Common Facilities Ownership Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2006, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Aquila, Inc., The Empire District Electric Company, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., and Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission (Exhibit 10.2.a to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.67*Joint Motion and Settlement Agreement dated as of February 26, 2008, among Great Plains Energy Incorporated, Kansas City Power & Light Company, the Kansas Corporation Commission Staff, the Citizens’ Utility Ratepayers Board, Aquila, Inc. d/b/a Aquila Networks, Black Hills Corporation, and Black Hills/Kansas Gas Utility Company, LLC (Exhibit 10.1.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.68*Stipulation and Agreement dated April 24, 2009, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Staff of the MissouriIndependent Registered Public Service Commission, Office of Public Counsel, Praxair, Inc., Midwest Energy Users Association, U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Nuclear Security Administration, Ford Motor Company, Missouri Industrial Energy Consumers and Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 30, 2009).
Great Plains EnergyAccounting Firm.
KCP&L
10.69*Non-Unanimous Stipulation and Agreement dated May 22, 2009 among KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company, the Staff of the Missouri Public Service Commission, the Office of the Public Counsel, Missouri Department of Natural Resources and Dogwood Energy, LLC (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 27, 2009).Great Plains Energy
10.70*Collaboration Agreement dated as of March 19, 2007, among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Sierra Club and Concerned Citizens of Platte County, Inc. (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 20, 2007).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.71*Amendment to the Collaboration Agreement effective as of September 5, 2008 among Kansas City Power & Light Company, Sierra Club and Concerned Citizens of Platte County, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2.20 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.72*Joint Operating Agreement between Kansas City Power & Light Company and Aquila, Inc., dated as of October 10, 2008 (Exhibit 10.2.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008).
Great Plains Energy
KCP&L
10.73*
Commitment letter, dated as of May 29, 2016, by Goldman Sachs Bank USA and Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC to Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2016).

Great Plains Energy


10.74*
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2016, by and between OCM Credit Portfolio LP and Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2016).

Great Plains Energy
12.1Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend Requirements.Great Plains Energy
12.2Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. KCP&L
     
21.123.3 List of Subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy Incorporated.Great Plains Energy
23.1 Great PlainsWestar Energy
23.2Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.KCP&L
     
24.1  Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
24.2 Westar Energy
24.3 KCP&L
     
31.1  Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
31.2  Great Plains EnergyEvergy
     
31.3  KCP&L
     
31.4 KCP&L


31.5Westar Energy
31.6Westar Energy
32.1**Evergy
32.2** KCP&L
     
32.132.3** Great PlainsWestar Energy
32.2**Section 1350 Certifications.KCP&L
     
101.INS XBRL Instance Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
     
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. 
Great PlainsEvergy
KCP&L
Westar Energy
KCP&L
* Filed with the SEC as exhibits to prior SEC filings and are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.  The SEC filings and the exhibit number of the documents so filed, and incorporated herein by reference, are stated in parenthesis in the description of such exhibit.


** Furnished and shall not be deemed filed for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).Act.  Such document shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document pursuant to the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless otherwise indicated in such registration statement or other document.
+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
∆ Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, and Evergy will furnish the omitted schedules to the SEC upon request.

Copies of any of the exhibits filed with the SEC in connection with this documentreport may be obtained from KCP&Lthe applicable registrant upon written request.
The registrants agree to furnish to the SEC upon request any instrument with respect to long-term debt as to which the total amount of securities authorized does not exceed 10% of total assets of such registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


Schedule I - Parent Company Financial Statements
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Statements of Comprehensive Income of Parent Company
        
Year Ended December 31 2016 2015 2014 
Operating Expenses  (millions, except per share amounts) 
General and administrative $2.7
 $0.9
 $1.1
 
Costs to achieve the acquisition of Westar Energy, Inc. 18.3
 
 
 
General taxes 0.1
 0.2
 0.4
 
Total 21.1
 1.1
 1.5
 
Operating loss (21.1) (1.1) (1.5) 
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries 287.5
 220.9
 251.1
 
Non-operating income 31.3
 29.7
 33.1
 
Interest (charges) income 2.6
 (40.3) (44.3) 
Income before income taxes 300.3
 209.2
 238.4
 
Income tax (expense) benefit (10.3) 3.8
 4.4
 
Net income 290.0
 213.0
 242.8
 
Preferred stock dividend requirements and redemption premium 16.5
 1.6
 1.6
 
Earnings available for common shareholders $273.5
 $211.4
 $241.2
 
        
Average number of basic common shares outstanding 169.4
 154.2
 153.9
 
Average number of diluted common shares outstanding 169.8
 154.8
 154.1
 
        
Basic and diluted earnings per common share $1.61
 $1.37
 $1.57
 
Comprehensive Income       
Net income $290.0
 $213.0
 $242.8
 
Other comprehensive income       
Derivative hedging activity       
Reclassification to expenses 0.4
 0.5
 4.4
 
Income tax expense (0.2) (0.1) (1.7) 
Net reclassification to expenses 0.2
 0.4
 2.7
 
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax 0.2
 0.4
 2.7
 
Other comprehensive income from subsidiaries, net of tax 5.2
 6.3
 3.9
 
Total other comprehensive income 5.4
 6.7
 6.6
 
Comprehensive income $295.4
 $219.7
 $249.4
 
EVERGY, INC.
Statement of Income of Parent Company
  
 
Period from June 4, 2018 through
December 31, 2018
OPERATING EXPENSES: (millions)
Operating and maintenance$54.6
Total Operating Expenses54.6
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS(54.6)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) 
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries364.7
Investment earnings26.3
Other expense(2.6)
Total Other Income (Expense), Net388.4
Interest expense19.6
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES314.2
Income tax benefit(10.7)
NET INCOME$324.9
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
NET INCOME$324.9
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
Derivative hedging activity 
Loss on derivative hedging instruments(5.4)
Income tax benefit1.4
Net loss on derivative hedging instruments(4.0)
Derivative hedging activity, net of tax(4.0)
Other comprehensive income from subsidiaries, net1.0
Total other comprehensive loss(3.0)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$321.9
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements of Parent Company are an integral part of these statements.


GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Balance Sheets of Parent Company
        
 December 31
 2016 2015
ASSETS(millions, except share amounts)
Current Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents $1,283.9
   $
 
Time deposit 1,000.0
   
 
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries 10.6
   4.1
 
Notes receivable from subsidiaries 2.0
   2.0
 
Money pool receivable 
   3.7
 
Derivative instruments 79.3
   
 
Other 26.1
   0.4
 
Total 2,401.9
   10.2
 
Investments and Other Assets  
    
 
Investment in KCP&L 2,541.5
   2,433.1
 
Investment in other subsidiaries 1,341.6
   1,385.9
 
Note receivable from subsidiaries 634.9
   634.9
 
Deferred income taxes 12.8
   34.8
 
Other 16.3
   1.6
 
Total 4,547.1
   4,490.3
 
Total $6,949.0
   $4,500.5
 
        
LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION       
Current Liabilities       
Notes payable $
   $10.0
 
Current maturities of long-term debt 100.0
   
 
Accounts payable to subsidiaries 10.8
   31.7
 
Accrued taxes 12.9
   4.5
 
Accrued interest 10.1
   4.1
 
Other 12.8
   9.5
 
Total 146.6
   59.8
 
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities 2.2
   7.1
 
Capitalization  
    
 
Great Plains Energy shareholders' equity  
    
 
Common stock - 600,000,000 and 250,000,000 shares authorized without par value
215,479,105 and 154,504,900 shares issued, stated value
 4,217.0
   2,646.7
 
Cumulative preferred stock - 390,000 shares authorized, $100 par value
     0 and 390,000 shares issued and outstanding
 
   39.0
 
Preference stock - 11,000,000 shares authorized without par value
     7.00% Series B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock
       $1,000 per share liquidation preference, 862,500 and 0 shares issued and outstanding
 836.2
   
 
Retained earnings 1,119.2
   1,024.4
 
Treasury stock - 128,087 and 101,229 shares, at cost (3.8)   (2.6) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (6.6)   (12.0) 
Total shareholders' equity 6,162.0
   3,695.5
 
Long-term debt 638.2
   738.1
 
Total 6,800.2
   4,433.6
 
Commitments and Contingencies 

   

 
Total $6,949.0
   $4,500.5
 
EVERGY, INC.
Balance Sheet of Parent Company
 December 31
 2018
ASSETS 
CURRENT ASSETS: 
Cash and cash equivalents$107.1
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries35.2
Notes receivable from subsidiaries2.0
Prepaid expenses and other assets2.2
Total Current Assets146.5
OTHER ASSETS: 
Investment in subsidiaries9,785.6
Note receivable from subsidiaries634.9
Deferred income taxes36.3
Other1.1
Total Other Assets10,457.9
TOTAL ASSETS$10,604.4
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY 
CURRENT LIABILITIES: 
Accounts payable to subsidiaries28.1
Accrued interest2.1
Derivative instruments5.4
Other6.3
Total Current Liabilities41.9
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: 
Long-term debt, net638.1
Other17.6
Total Long-Term Liabilities655.7
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14) 
EQUITY: 
Evergy, Inc. Shareholders' Equity: 
Common stock - 600,000,000 shares authorized, without par value, 255,326,252 shares issued8,668.3
Retained earnings1,241.5
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(3.0)
Total shareholders' equity9,906.8
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY10,604.4
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements of Parent Company are an integral part of these statements.


GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
Statements of Cash Flows of Parent Company
            
Year Ended December 31 2016   2015   2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities (millions) 
Net income $290.0
   $213.0
   $242.8
 
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities:           
Amortization 30.4
   0.8
   4.8
 
Deferred income taxes, net 21.8
   (1.7)   (1.4) 
Fair value impact of interest rate swaps (79.3)   
   
 
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries (287.5)   (220.9)   (251.1) 
Cash flows affected by changes in:           
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries (9.8)   (0.1)   (3.8) 
Taxes receivable 
   
   0.2
 
Accounts payable to subsidiaries (20.9)   1.3
   (3.2) 
Other accounts payable 7.0
   
   
 
Accrued taxes 8.4
   0.3
   4.3
 
Accrued interest 6.0
   
   (0.1) 
Cash dividends from subsidiaries 239.0
   157.0
   144.0
 
Uncertain tax positions (0.4)   
   (2.9) 
Other 8.4
   8.7
   11.8
 
Net cash from operating activities 213.1
   158.4
   145.4
 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities  
    
     
Purchase of time deposit (1,000.0)   
   
 
Intercompany lending 
   (1.4)   
 
Net money pool lending 3.7
   (0.4)   6.1
 
Investment in subsidiary (7.3)   (7.8)   (3.6) 
Net cash from investing activities (1,003.6)   (9.6)   2.5
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities  
    
     
Issuance of common stock 1,603.7
   3.0
   4.8
 
Issuance of preference stock 862.5
   
   
 
Issuance fees (143.4)   
   (0.1) 
Net change in short-term borrowings (10.0)   6.0
   (5.0) 
Dividends paid (194.0)   (155.5)   (145.6) 
Redemption of cumulative preferred stock (40.1)   
   
 
Purchase of treasury stock (5.0)   (1.6)   (2.5) 
Other financing activities 0.7
   (0.7)   0.5
 
Net cash from financing activities 2,074.4
   (148.8)   (147.9) 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 1,283.9
   
   
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 
   
   
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $1,283.9
   $
   $
 
EVERGY, INC.
Statement of Cash Flow of Parent Company
  
 
Period from June 4, 2018 through
December 31, 2018
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:(millions)
Net income$324.9
Adjustments to reconcile income to net cash from operating activities: 
Non-cash compensation10.0
Net deferred income taxes and credits(6.3)
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries(364.7)
Changes in working capital items: 
Accounts receivable from subsidiaries(8.5)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(1.2)
Accounts payable to subsidiaries4.7
Accrued taxes(35.2)
Other current liabilities(11.2)
Cash dividends from subsidiaries236.0
Changes in other assets0.1
Changes in other liabilities20.0
Cash Flows from Operating Activities168.6
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: 
Cash acquired from the merger with Great Plains Energy1,142.2
Proceeds from interest rate swap140.6
Cash Flows from Investing Activities1,282.8
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: 
Short term debt, net(56.1)
Cash dividends paid(245.9)
Repurchase of common stock(1,042.3)
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities(1,344.3)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS107.1
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: 
Beginning of period
End of period$107.1
The accompanying Notes to Financial Statements of Parent Company are an integral part of these statements.
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED

EVERGY, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY
The Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 should be read in conjunction with the Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. Parent Company Financial Statements.
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Great Plains Energy IncorporatedEvergy, Inc. Parent Company Financial Statements have been prepared to presentcomply with Rule 12-04 of Regulation S-X.
Evergy, Inc. was incorporated in 2017 as Monarch Energy, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy. Prior to the financial position, resultsclosing of operationsthe merger transactions, Monarch Energy changed its name to Evergy, Inc. and cash flowsdid not conduct any business activities other than those required for its formation and matters contemplated by the Amended Merger Agreement. On June 4, 2018, in accordance with the Amended Merger Agreement, Great Plains Energy merged into Evergy, Inc., with Evergy, Inc. surviving the merger and King Energy merged into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving the merger. These merger transactions resulted in Evergy, Inc. becoming the parent entity of Westar Energy and the direct subsidiaries of Great Plains Energy, on a stand-alone basis as a holding company. Investmentsincluding KCP&L and GMO.
See Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the merger.
Evergy, Inc. operates primarily through its wholly-owned direct subsidiaries. Evergy, Inc.'s investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method. Fair value adjustments and goodwill related to the acquired assets and liabilities of Great Plains Energy and its direct subsidiaries are only reflected on Evergy's consolidated financial statements and as such, are not included in Evergy, Inc.'s Parent Company Financial Statements. See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statement for additional information.
2. LONG-TERM DEBT
See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on Evergy, Inc.'s long-term debt.
3. GUARANTEES
See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding Evergy, Inc.'s guarantees.
4. DIVIDENDS
Cash dividends paid to Evergy, Inc. by its subsidiaries were $236.0 million for the period from June 4, 2018 through December 31, 2018. See Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding the dividend restrictions of Evergy, Inc. and its subsidiaries.


Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves
Great Plains Energy Incorporated
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
                
    Additions      
  Charged   
 Balance AtTo CostsCharged Balance
 BeginningAndTo Other At End
DescriptionOf PeriodExpensesAccountsDeductionsOf Period
Year Ended December 31, 2016(millions)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $3.8
  $9.0
  $8.1
(a) 
 $16.9
(b) 
 $4.0
 
Legal reserves 5.9
  10.4
  
  0.2
(c) 
 16.1
 
Environmental reserves 1.7
  
  
  
  1.7
 
Tax valuation allowance 19.9
  0.1
  
  3.6
(d) 
 16.4
 
Year Ended December 31, 2015               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $2.8
  $10.5
  $8.7
(a) 
 $18.2
(b) 
 $3.8
 
Legal reserves 4.7
  2.6
  
  1.4
(c) 
 5.9
 
Environmental reserves 1.7
  
  
  
  1.7
 
Tax valuation allowance 16.6
  4.9
  
  1.6
(d) 
 19.9
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $2.5
  $11.4
  $8.5
(a) 
 $19.6
(b) 
 $2.8
 
Legal reserves 4.6
  2.7
  
  2.6
(c) 
 4.7
 
Environmental reserves 1.7
  
  
  
  1.7
 
Tax valuation allowance 20.7
  0.5
  
  4.6
(d) 
 16.6
 
Evergy, Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
                
    Additions      
  Charged   
 Balance AtTo CostsCharged Balance
 BeginningAndTo Other At End
DescriptionOf PeriodExpensesAccountsDeductionsOf Period
Year Ended December 31, 2018(millions)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $6.7
  $20.7
  $16.9
(e) 
 $35.1
(b) 
 $9.2
 
Tax valuation allowance 
  2.2
  26.8
(d) 
 1.7
(c) 
 27.3
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $6.7
  $10.5
  $7.0
(a) 
 $17.5
(b) 
 $6.7
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $5.3
  $12.2
  $6.2
(a) 
 $17.0
(b) 
 $6.7
 
(a) Recoveries.
(b) Uncollectible accounts charged off.
(c) Payment of claims.
(d)    Reversal of tax valuation allowance.
(d) Primarily represents the addition of Great Plains Energy's allowance as of the date of the merger.
(e) Recoveries and the addition of Great Plains Energy's allowance as of the date of the merger.


Kansas City Power & Light Company
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
                
    Additions      
  Charged   
 Balance AtTo CostsCharged Balance
 BeginningAndTo Other At End
DescriptionOf PeriodExpensesAccountsDeductionsOf Period
Year Ended December 31, 2016(millions)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $1.8
  $6.4
  $5.5
(a) 
 $11.9
(b) 
 $1.8
 
Legal reserves 5.3
  9.8
  
  
(c) 
 15.1
 
Environmental reserves 0.3
  
  
  
  0.3
 
Tax valuation allowance 0.7
  
  
  0.7
(d) 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2015               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $1.2
  $7.1
  $5.8
(a) 
 $12.3
(b) 
 $1.8
 
Legal reserves 2.9
  2.6
  
  0.2
(c) 
 5.3
 
Environmental reserves 0.3
  
  
  
  0.3
 
Tax valuation allowance 
  0.7
  
  
  0.7
 
Year Ended December 31, 2014               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $1.1
  $7.6
  $5.5
(a) 
 $13.0
(b) 
 $1.2
 
Legal reserves 2.9
  2.3
  
  2.3
(c) 
 2.9
 
Environmental reserves 0.3
  
  
  
  0.3
 
Westar Energy, Inc.
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
                
    Additions      
  Charged   
 Balance AtTo CostsCharged Balance
 BeginningAndTo Other At End
DescriptionOf PeriodExpensesAccountsDeductionsOf Period
Year Ended December 31, 2018(millions)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $6.7
  $9.0
  $7.4
(a) 
 $19.2
(b) 
 $3.9
 
Tax valuation allowance 
  1.7
  
  
  1.7
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $6.7
  $10.5
  $7.0
(a) 
 $17.5
(b) 
 $6.7
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $5.3
  $12.2
  $6.2
(a) 
 $17.0
(b) 
 $6.7
 
(a) Recoveries.
(b) Uncollectible accounts charged off.
(c)    Payment of claims.
(d)    Reversal of tax valuation allowance.



Kansas City Power & Light Company
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
                
    Additions      
  Charged   
 Balance AtTo CostsCharged Balance
 BeginningAndTo Other At End
DescriptionOf PeriodExpensesAccountsDeductionsOf Period
Year Ended December 31, 2018(millions)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $2.2
  $13.1
  $4.4
(a) 
 $15.9
(b) 
 $3.8
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $1.8
  $7.5
  $5.6
(a) 
 $12.7
(b) 
 $2.2
 
Tax valuation allowance 
  1.2
  
  1.2
(c) 
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016               
Allowance for uncollectible accounts $1.8
  $6.4
  $5.5
(a) 
 $11.9
(b)��
 $1.8
 
Tax valuation allowance 0.7
  
  
  0.7
(c) 
 
 
(a) Recoveries.
(b) Uncollectible accounts charged off.
(c) Reversal of tax valuation allowance.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 GREAT PLAINS ENERGY INCORPORATED
EVERGY, INC.
 
   
Date: February 23, 201721, 2019
By: /s/ Terry Bassham
 
 Terry Bassham
 
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitle Date
/s/ Terry BasshamChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer)February 23, 201721, 2019
Terry Bassham(Principal Executive Officer))
  )
/s/ Kevin E. BryantAnthony D. SommaSeniorExecutive Vice President - Finance and Strategy and Chief Financial Officer)
Kevin E. BryantAnthony D. Somma(Principal Financial Officer))
  )
/s/ Steven P. BusserVice President - Risk Management and Controller)
Steven P. Busser(Principal Accounting Officer))
  )
David L. Bodde*Mark A. Ruelle*Chairman of the Board of Directors)
)
Mollie Hale Carter*Director)
  )
Randall C. Ferguson, Jr.*Charles Q. Chandler IV*Director)
  )
Gary D. Forsee*Director)
  )
Scott D. Grimes*Director)
  )
Richard L. Hawley*Director)
)
Thomas D. Hyde*Director)
  )
James A. Mitchell*

B. Anthony Isaac*
Director)
)
Sandra A.J. Lawrence*Director)
  )
Ann D. Murtlow*Director)
  )
Sandra J. Price*Director)
  )
John J. Sherman*Director)
)
S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.*Director)
*By    /s/ Terry Bassham
Terry Bassham
Attorney-in-Fact*



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.                
 KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
 
   
Date: February 23, 201721, 2019
By: /s/ Terry Bassham
 
 Terry Bassham 
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitle Date
/s/ Terry BasshamChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer)February 23, 201721, 2019
Terry Bassham(Principal Executive Officer))
  )
/s/ Kevin E. BryantAnthony D. SommaSeniorExecutive Vice President - Finance and Strategy and Chief Financial Officer)
Kevin E. BryantAnthony D. Somma(Principal Financial Officer))
  )
/s/ Steven P. BusserVice President - Risk Management and Controller)
Steven P. Busser(Principal Accounting Officer))
  )
David L. Bodde*Mark A. Ruelle*Chairman of the Board of Directors)
)
Mollie Hale Carter*Director)
  )
Randall C. Ferguson, Jr.*Charles Q. Chandler IV*Director)
  )
Gary D. Forsee*Director)
  )
Scott D. Grimes*Director)
  )
Richard L. Hawley*Director)
)
Thomas D. Hyde*Director)
  )
James A. Mitchell*B. Anthony Isaac*Director)
)
Sandra A.J. Lawrence*Director)
  )
Ann D. Murtlow*Director)
  )
Sandra J. Price*Director)
  )
John J. Sherman*Director)
)
S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.*Director)
*By    /s/ Terry Bassham
Terry Bassham
Attorney-in-Fact*


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.                
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Date: February 21, 2019
By: /s/ Terry Bassham
Terry Bassham
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Terry BasshamPresident and Chief Executive Officer)February 21, 2019
Terry Bassham(Principal Executive Officer))
)
/s/ Anthony D. SommaExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
Anthony D. Somma(Principal Financial Officer))
)
/s/ Steven P. BusserVice President - Risk Management and Controller)
Steven P. Busser(Principal Accounting Officer))
)
Mark A. Ruelle*Chairman of the Board of Directors)
)
Mollie Hale Carter*Director)
)
Charles Q. Chandler IV*Director)
)
Gary D. Forsee*Director)
)
Scott D. Grimes*Director)
)
Richard L. Hawley*Director)
)
Thomas D. Hyde*Director)
)
B. Anthony Isaac*Director)
)
Sandra A.J. Lawrence*Director)
)
Ann D. Murtlow*Director)
)
Sandra J. Price*Director)
)
John J. Sherman*Director)
)
S. Carl Soderstrom Jr.*Director)
*By    /s/ Terry Bassham
Terry Bassham
Attorney-in-Fact*


150176