SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

FORM 10-K

x
þAnnual Report underpursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, or

oTransition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______._____.

Commission file number 1-10714

AUTOZONE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
Nevada62-1482048
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

123 South Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38103

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(901) 495-6500

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 
Name of each exchange
Title of each class
on
On which registered
Common Stock
($.01 par value)
New York Stock Exchange
($.01 par value)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþx Noo
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.Yeso No  No þx
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesþ Noxo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  No Yeso Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.xo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.smaller reporting company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filerfiler” and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Large accelerated filerþAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated filero
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)Yeso No No þx
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $8,723,547,564.

$7,449,415,374.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 15, 2007,19, 2009, was 64,914,83349,868,736.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held December 12, 2007,16, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

  4 
  4 
4
  5 
Marketing and Merchandising Strategy  5 
  6 
  6 
  7 
  8 
  8 
  8 
  8 
8
  9 
Executive Officers of the Registrant  9 
  10 
12
Item 2. Properties12
Item 3. Legal Proceedings13
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  13 
     
13
  14 
14
15
  1415 
  1617 
  1819 
  2732 
  2934 
  57
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures57
Item 9B. Other Information5762 
     
  5862 
62
63
  5863 
Item 11. Executive Compensation  58 
63
  58
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence58
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services5863 
     
  5963 
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules  59 
63
64
64
Exhibit 12.1
Exhibit 21.1
Exhibit 23.1
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

2


2


Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kpress release are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements typically use words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “positioned,” “strategy”“strategy,” and similar expressions. These are based on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, credit market conditions; the impact of recessionary conditions; competition; product demand; the economy; credit markets; the ability to hire and retain qualified employees; consumer debt levels; inflation; weather; raw material costs of our suppliers; energy prices; war and the prospect of war, including terrorist activity; availability of commercialconsumer transportation; construction delays; access to available and feasible financing; and changes in laws or regulations. Certain of these risks are discussed in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item IA under Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and you should read these Risk Factors carefully. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results,results; developments and business decisions may differ from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements, and such events described above and in “Risk Factors” could materially and adversely affect our business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Actual results may materially differ from anticipated results. Please refer to the Risk Factors section contained in Item 1 under Part I of this Form 10-K for more details.

3


3


PART I

Item 1. Business

Introduction

We are the nation’s leading specialty retailer and a leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories, with most of our sales to do-it-yourself (“DIY”) customers.accessories. We began operations in 1979 and at August 25, 200729, 2009, operated 3,9334,229 stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 123188 in Mexico. Each of our stores carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. In manyAt August 29, 2009, in 2,303 of our stores we also have a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and service stations.public sector accounts. We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web at www.autozone.com,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, we sell diagnosticautomotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and repair information, autonon-automotive products through www.autozone.com, and light truck parts, and accessories.as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation services.

At August 25, 2007, our stores were in the following locations:

At August 29, 2009, our stores were in the following locations:Store Count
Alabama  9097 
Arizona  110119 
Arkansas  59 
California  428447 
Colorado  5562 
Connecticut  3135 
Delaware  10 
Florida  173196 
Georgia  160175 
Idaho  1819 
Illinois  192208 
Indiana  125137 
Iowa  2223 
Kansas  3738 
Kentucky  7478 
Louisiana  97108 
Maine  6 
Maryland  3839 
Massachusetts  66 
Michigan  133145 
Minnesota  2225 
Mississippi  8185 
Missouri  90100 
Montana  1 
Nebraska  1314 
Nevada  4249 
New Hampshire  16 
New Jersey  5761 
New Mexico  5458 
New York  112114 
North Carolina  145164 
North Dakota  21 
Ohio  205219 
Oklahoma  6667 
Oregon  2527 
Pennsylvania  101109 
Puerto Rico  1521 
Rhode Island  15 
South Carolina  6875

4


At August 29, 2009, our stores were in the following locations:Store Count
 
South Dakota  12 
Tennessee  145150 
Texas  492525 
Utah  3439 
Vermont  1 
Virginia  8187 
Washington  4453 
Washington, DC  
6
 
West Virginia  2223 
Wisconsin  4850 
Wyoming  5 
Domestic Total  3,9334,229 
Mexico  123 188 
TOTAL  4,056
Total4,417
 

4


Marketing and Merchandising Strategy

We are dedicated to providing customers with superior service value and quality automotive parts and products at a great value in conveniently located, well-designed stores. Key elements of this strategy are:

Customer Service
Customer service is the most important element in our marketing and merchandising strategy, which is based upon consumer marketing research. We emphasize that our AutoZoners (employees) should always put customers first by providing prompt, courteous service and trustworthy advice. Our electronic parts catalog assists in the selection of parts; and lifetime warranties are offered by us or our vendors on many of the parts we sell. Our wide area network in our stores helps us to expedite credit or debit card and check approval processes, to locate parts at neighboring AutoZone stores, and in some cases, to place special orders directly with our vendors.

Our stores generally open at 7:30 or 8 a.m. and close between 8 and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and typically open at 9 a.m. and close between 6 and 9 p.m. on Sunday. However, some stores are open 24 hours, and some have extended hours of 6 or 7 a.m. until midnight seven days a week.

We also provide specialty tools through our Loan-A-Tool®Loan-A-Tool® program. Customers can borrow a specialty tool, such as a steering wheel puller, for which a DIYdo-it-yourself (“DIY”) customer or a repair shop would have little or no use other than for a single job. AutoZoners also provide other free services, including check engine light readings;readings where allowed by law, battery charging;charging, the collection of DIY used oil for recycling; and the testing of starters, alternators, batteries, sensors and actuators.

Merchandising
The following table showstables show some of the types of products that we sell:
sell by major category of items:
Hard Parts
 
Maintenance Items
 
Accessories and Non-Automotive
FailureMaintenance ItemsDiscretionary
A/C Compressors Antifreeze & Windshield Washer Fluid Air Fresheners
AlternatorsBatteries & Accessories BeltsBrake Drums, Rotors, Shoes & HosesPads Cell Phone Accessories
BatteriesBelts & Accessories
Brake Drums, Rotors,
Hoses
 
Chemicals, including Brake & Power
Drinks & Snacks
CarburetorsSteering Fluid, Oil & Fuel Additives 
DrinksFloor Mats & Snacks
Floor Mats
Seat Covers
Shoes & PadsFusesHand Cleaner
CarburetorsLightingNeon Lighting
ClutchesChassis Oil & Transmission Fluid Mirrors
CV AxlesClutches Oil, Air, Fuel & Transmission Filters Paint & AccessoriesPerformance Products
EnginesCV Axles Oxygen Sensors Performance ProductsProtectants & Cleaners
Fuel PumpsEngines ProtectantsPaint & CleanersAccessories Seat Covers
MufflersFuel Pumps Refrigerant & Accessories Steering Wheel CoversSealants & Adhesives
FusesShock Absorbers & Struts Sealants & AdhesivesStereosSteering Wheel Covers
StartersIgnition Spark Plugs & Wires ToolsStereos & Radios
Water PumpsWash & Wax
Lighting Windshield Wipers Tools
MufflersWash & Wax
Starters & Alternators
Water Pumps
Radiators
Thermostats 

5


5

We believe that the satisfaction of DIY customers and professional technicians is often impacted by our ability to provide specific automotive products as requested. Our stores generally offer approximately 21,000 stock keeping units (“SKUs”), covering a broad range of vehicle types. Each store carries the same basic product lines, but we tailor our parts inventory to the makes and models of the vehicles in each store’s trade area. Our hub stores carry a larger assortment of products that can be delivered to commercialCommercial customers or to local satellite stores. In excess of 750,000 additional SKUs of slower-selling products are available either through our vendor direct program (“VDP”), which offers overnight delivery, or through our salvage auto parts and original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) parts programs.

We are constantly updating the products that we offer to assureensure that our inventory matches the products that our customers demand.

Pricing
We want to be perceived by our customers as the value leader in our industry by consistently providing quality merchandise at the right price, backed by a good warranty and outstanding customer service. On many of our products we offer multiple value choices in a good/better/best assortment, with appropriate price and quality differences from the “good” products to the “better” and “best” products. A key differentiating component versus our competitors is our exclusive line of in-house brands: Valucraft, AutoZone, Duralast and Duralast Gold. We believe that our overall prices and value comparecompares favorably to those of our competitors.

Marketing:Brand: Advertising and Promotions
We believe that targeted advertising and promotions play important roles in succeeding in today’s environment. We are constantly working to understand our customers’ wants and needs so that we can build long-lasting, loyal relationships. We utilize promotions and advertising primarily to advise customers about the overall importance of vehicle maintenance, our great value and the availability of high quality parts. Broadcast and targeted loyalty efforts aremedia is our primary marketing methodsadvertising method of driving traffic to our stores. We utilize in-store signage, and creative product placement and promotions to help educate customers about products that they need.

Store Design and Visual Merchandising
We design and build stores for a high visual impact. The typical AutoZone store utilizes colorful exterior and interior signage, exposed beams and ductwork and brightly lighted interiors. Maintenance products, accessories and miscellaneousnon-automotive items are attractively displayed for easy browsing by customers. In-store signage and special displays promote products on floor displays, end caps and on the shelf.

Commercial

Our commercialCommercial sales program operates in a highly fragmented market, and iswe are one of the leading distributors of automotive parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, and service stations and public sector accounts in the United States.States, Puerto Rico and Mexico. As a part of the program we offer credit and delivery to our commercialCommercial customers. The program operatedoperates out of 2,1822,303 domestic stores as of August 25, 2007.29, 2009. Through our hub stores, we offer a greater range of parts and products desired by professional technicians, andtechnicians; this additional inventory is available for our DIY customers as well. We have a national sales teamteams focused on national, regional and regional commercialpublic sector Commercial accounts.

Store Operations

Store Formats
Substantially all AutoZone stores are based on standard store formats, resulting in generally consistent appearance, merchandising and product mix. Approximately 85% to 90% of each store’s square footage is selling space, of which approximately 40% to 45% is dedicated to hard parts inventory. The hard parts inventory area is generally fronted by counters or pods that run the depth or length of the store, dividing the hard parts area from the remainder of the store. The remaining selling space contains displays of maintenance, accessories and non-automotive items.

We believe that our stores are “destination stores,” generating their own traffic rather than relying on traffic created by adjacent stores. Therefore, we situate most stores on major thoroughfares with easy access and good parking.

6


6

Store Personnel and Training
Each store typically employs from 10 to 16 AutoZoners, including a manager and, in some cases, an assistant manager. AutoZoners typically have prior automotive experience. All AutoZoners are encouraged to complete coursestests resulting in certification by the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (“ASE”), which is broadly recognized for training certification in the automotive industry. Although we do on-the-job training, we also provide formal training programs, including an annual national sales meeting, regular store meetings on specific sales and product issues, standardized training manuals and a specialist program that provides training to AutoZoners in several areas of technical expertise from both the Company and from independent certification agencies. Training is supplemented with frequent store visits by management.

Store managers, sales representatives and commercial specialists receive financial incentives through performance-based bonuses. In addition, our growth has provided opportunities for the promotion of qualified AutoZoners. We believe these opportunities are important to attract, motivate and retain high quality AutoZoners.

All store support functions are centralized in our store support centers located in Memphis, Tennessee and Mexico. We believe that this centralization enhances consistent execution of our merchandising and marketing strategies at the store level, while reducing expenses and cost of sales.

Store Automation
All of our stores have Z-net,TM, our proprietary electronic catalog that enables our AutoZoners to efficiently look up the parts that our customers need and providesto provide complete job solutions, advice and information for customer vehicles. Z-netTM provides parts information based on the year, make, model and engine type of a vehicle and also tracks inventory availability at the store, at other nearby stores and through special order. The Z-netTM display screens are placed on the hard parts counter or pods, where both AutoZoners and customers can view the screen. In addition, our wide area network enables the stores to expedite credit or debit card and check approval processes, to access immediately national warranty data, to implement real-time inventory controls and to locate and hold parts at neighboring AutoZone stores.

Our stores utilize our computerized proprietary Store Management System, which includes bar code scanning and point-of-sale data collection terminals. The Store Management System provides administrative assistance and improved personnel scheduling at the store level, as well as enhanced merchandising information and improved inventory control. We believe the Store Management System also enhances customer service through faster processing of transactions, and simplified warranty and product return procedures.

Store Development

The following table reflects store development during the past five fiscal years:

                    
 
Fiscal Year 
  Fiscal Year 
 
2007
 
2006
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
2003 
  2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
           
Beginning Domestic Stores  3,771  3,592  3,420  3,219  3,068  4,092 3,933 3,771 3,592 3,420 
New Stores  163 185 175 202 160   140  160  163  185 175 
Closed Stores  1  6  3  1  9  3 1 1 6 3 
           
Net New Stores  162  179  172  201  151   137  159  162  179 172 
           
Relocated Stores  18 18 7 4 6  9 14 18 18 7 
Ending Domestic Stores  3,933 3,771 3,592 3,420 3,219  4,229 4,092 3,933 3,771 3,592 
Ending Mexico Stores  123  100  81  63  49  188  148  123  100 81 
           
Ending Total Stores  
4,056
  3,871  3,673  3,483  3,268  4,417 4,240 4,056 3,871 3,673 
           
The domestic stores include stores in the United States and Puerto Rico. The new store count in 2007 reflects 3 stores that were temporarily closed during fiscal 2006 and excluded from the prior year ending store count. We believe that expansion opportunities exist both in markets that we do not currently serve, as well as in markets where we can achieve a larger presence. We attempt to obtain high visibility sites in high traffic locations and undertake substantial research prior to entering new markets. The most important criteria for opening a new store are its projected future profitability and its ability to achieve our required investment hurdle rate. Key factors in selecting new site and market locations include population, demographics, vehicle profile, number and strength of competitors’ stores and the cost of real estate. In reviewing the vehicle profile, we also consider the number of vehicles that are seven years old and older-older, “our kind of vehicles,” as these are generally no longer under the original manufacturers’ warranties and will require more maintenance and repair than younger vehicles. We generally seek to open new stores within or contiguous to existing market areas and attempt to cluster development in markets in a relatively short period of time. In addition to continuing to lease or develop our own stores, we evaluate and may make strategic acquisitions.

7


7


Purchasing and Supply Chain

Merchandise is selected and purchased for all stores through our store support centers located in Memphis, Tennessee and Mexico. No oneIn fiscal 2009, no class of product accountssimilar products accounted for as much as 10 percent or more of our total sales. In fiscal 2007, nosales, nor did any single supplier accountedaccount for more than 10 percent of our total purchases. We generally have few long-term contracts for the purchase of merchandise. We believe that we have good relationships with suppliers. We also believe that alternative sources of supply exist, at similar cost, for most types of product sold. Most of our merchandise flows through our distribution centers to our stores by our fleet of tractors and trailers or by third-party trucking firms.

Our hub stores have increased our ability to distribute products on a timely basis to many of our stores.stores and to expand our product assortment. A hub store is able to provide replenishment of products sold and deliver other products maintained only in hub store inventories to a store in its coverage area generally within 24 hours. Hub stores are generally replenished from distribution centers multiple times per week.

Competition

The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive in many areas, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and price. AutoZone competes in both the retail do-it-yourself (“DIY”) and commercial do-it-for-me (“DIFM”) auto parts and accessories markets.

Competitors include national, regional and regionallocal auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, wholesalers and jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers, in addition to discount and mass merchandise stores, department stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores and home stores that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories, tools and maintenance parts. AutoZone competes on the basis of customer service, including the trustworthy advice of our AutoZoners, merchandise selection and availability, price, product warranty, store layouts and location.

Trademarks and Patents

We have registered several service marks and trademarks in the United States Patent and Trademark office as well as in certain other countries, including our service marks, “AutoZone” and “Get in the Zone,” and trademarks, “AutoZone,” “Duralast,” “Duralast Gold,” “Valucraft,” “ALLDATA”“ALLDATA,” “Loan-A-Tool” and “Z-netTM.“Z-net.” We believe that these service marks and trademarks are important components of our merchandising and marketing strategy.

Employees

As of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, we employed approximately 55,00060,000 persons, approximately 5657 percent of whom were employed full-time. About 9392 percent of our AutoZoners were employed in stores or in direct field supervision, approximately 5 percent in distribution centers and approximately 23 percent in store support and other functions. Included in the above numbers are approximately 2,0003,000 persons employed in our Mexico operations.

We have never experienced any material labor disruption and believe that relations with our AutoZoners are generally good.

8

AutoZone Website

AutoZone’s primary website is at http://www.autozone.com. We make available, free of charge, at our investor relations website, http://www.autozoneinc.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably feasible after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

8



Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following list describes our executive officers. The title of each executive officer includes the words “Customer Satisfaction” which reflects our commitment to customer service. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

William C. Rhodes, III, 4244Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Customer Satisfaction
William C. Rhodes, III, was named Chairman of AutoZone in Juneduring fiscal 2007 and has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a director since March 2005. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Rhodes was Executive Vice President-StorePresident—Store Operations and Commercial. Prior to fiscal 2005, he had been Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident—Supply Chain and Information Technology since fiscal 2002, and prior thereto had been Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident—Supply Chain since 2001. Prior to that time, he served in various capacities within the Company, including Vice President-StoresPresident—Stores in 2000, Senior Vice President-FinancePresident—Finance and Vice President-FinancePresident—Finance in 1999 and Vice President-OperationsPresident—Operations Analysis and Support from 1997 to 1999. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst & Young LLP.

William T. Giles, 48Chief Financial Officer andExecutive Vice President, Finance, Information Technology and Store Development, Customer Satisfaction
William T. Giles, 50Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance, Information Technology and Store Development, Customer Satisfaction
William T. Giles was elected Executive Vice President - Finance, Information Technology and Store Development in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from June 2006 to December 2006 and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since May 2006. From 1991 to May 2006, he held several positions with Linens N’ Things, Inc., most recently as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to 1991, he was with Melville, Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Harry L. Goldsmith, 56—58—Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Customer Satisfaction
Harry L. Goldsmith was elected Executive Vice-President,Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary during fiscal 2006. Previously, he was Senior Vice President, SecretaryGeneral Counsel and General CounselSecretary since 1996 and was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1993 to 1996.

Robert D. Olsen, 54—56—Executive Vice President- PresidentStore Operations, Commercial and Mexico, Customer Satisfaction
Robert D. Olsen was electedhas been Executive Vice President- PresidentStore Operations, Commercial and Mexicoduring since fiscal 2007. Prior to that,Effective November 1, 2009, he was elected Corporate Development Officer, with primary responsibility for Mexico, ALLDATA and other strategic initiatives. Previously, he was Executive Vice President-President—Supply Chain, Information Technology, Mexico and Store Development since fiscal 2006. Previously, he was2006 and before that, Senior Vice President since fiscal 2000 with primary responsibility for store development and Mexico operations. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Olsen was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Leslie’s Poolmart. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Olsen held several positions with AutoZone, including Controller, Vice President-Finance, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

James A. Shea, 62—64—Executive Vice President-Merchandising,President—Merchandising, Marketing and Supply Chain,, Customer Satisfaction
James A. Shea was elected Executive Vice President-Merchandising, Marketing and Supply Chain during fiscal 2007 and has served as Executive Vice President-MerchandisingPresident—Merchandising and Marketing since fiscal 2005. He was President and Co-founder of Portero during 2004. Prior to 2004, he was Chief Executive Officer of Party City from 1999 to 2003. From 1995 to 1999, he was with Lechters Housewares where he was Senior Vice President Marketing and Merchandising before being named President in 1997. From 1990 to 1995, he was Senior Vice President of Home for Kaufmanns Department Store, a division of May Company.

Jon A. Bascom,52Senior Vice President—Chief Information Officer, Customer Satisfaction
Jon A. Bascom was elected Senior Vice President—Chief Information Officer during fiscal 2008. Previously, he was Vice President—Information Technology since 1996. Since 1989, Mr. Bascom has worked in a variety of leadership roles in applications development, infrastructure, and technology support. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Bascom worked for Malone & Hyde, AutoZone’s predecessor company, for 9 years.
9

Timothy W. Briggs, 4648Senior Vice President-HumanPresident—Human Resources,, Customer Satisfaction
Timothy W. Briggs was elected Senior Vice President-HumanPresident—Human Resources in October 2005.during fiscal 2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President - President—Field Human Resources since March 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Briggs was Vice President - President—Organization Development. From 1996 to 2002, Mr. Briggs served in various management capacities at the Limited Inc., including Vice President, Human Resources.

9



Mark A. Finestone,48Senior Vice President—Merchandising, Customer Satisfaction
Mark A. Finestone was elected Senior Vice President—Merchandising during fiscal 2008. Previously, he was Vice President—Merchandising since 2002. Prior to joining AutoZone in 2002, Mr. Finestone worked for May Department Stores for 19 years where he held a variety of leadership roles which included Divisional Vice President, Merchandising.
William W. Graves,4749Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident—Supply Chain, Customer Satisfaction
William W. Graves was elected Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident—Supply Chain in October 2005.during fiscal 2006. Prior thereto, he was Vice President - President—Supply Chain since 2000. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Graves served in various capacities with the Company.

Lisa R. Kranc, 54—56—Senior Vice President-Marketing,President—Marketing, Customer Satisfaction
Lisa R. Kranc was elected Senior Vice President-Marketing during fiscal 2001. Previously, she was Vice President-Marketing for Hannaford Bros. Co., a Maine-based grocery chain, since 1997, and was Senior Vice President-Marketing for Bruno’s, Inc., from 1996 to 1997. Prior to 1996, she was Vice President-Marketing for Giant Eagle, Inc. since 1992.

Thomas B. Newbern, 45—47—Senior Vice President-StorePresident—Store Operations, Customer Satisfaction
Thomas B. Newbern was elected Senior Vice President-Store Operations in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Previously, Mr. Newbern held the title Vice President, President—Store Operations for AutoZone since 1998. A twenty-onetwenty-two year AutoZoner, he has held several key management positions with the Company.

Charlie Pleas, III, 42—44—Senior Vice President, Controller, Customer Satisfaction
Charlie Pleas, III, was elected Senior Vice President and Controller in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Prior to that, he was Vice President, Controller since 2003. Previously, he was Vice President-AccountingPresident—Accounting since 2000, and Director of General Accounting since 1996. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Pleas was a Division Controller with Fleming Companies, Inc. where he served in various capacities from 1988.

Larry M. Roesel, 50—52—Senior Vice President-Commercial,President—Commercial, Customer Satisfaction
Larry M. Roesel joined AutoZone as Senior Vice President-Commercial in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Mr. Roesel came to AutoZone with more than thirty years of experience with OfficeMax, Inc. and its predecessor, where he served in operations, sales and general management.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a variety of risks. Set forth below are certain of the important risks that we face and that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results. These risks are not the only ones we face. Our business could also be affected by additional factors that are presently unknown to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial to our business.

Continued deterioration in the global credit markets, changes in our credit ratings and macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our short-term and long-term debt is rated investment grade by the major rating agencies. These investment-grade credit ratings have historically allowed us to take advantage of lower interest rates and other favorable terms on our short-term credit lines, in our senior debt offerings and in the commercial paper markets. To maintain our investment-grade ratings, we are required to meet certain financial performance ratios. An increase in our debt and/or a decline in our earnings could result in downgrades in our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings could result in an increase in interest rates and more restrictive terms on certain of our senior debt and our commercial paper, could limit our access to public debt markets, could limit the institutions willing to provide credit facilities to us and could significantly increase the interest rates on such facilities from current levels.

10


Moreover, significant deterioration in the financial condition of large financial institutions has resulted in a severe loss of liquidity and availability of credit in global credit markets and in higher short-term borrowing costs and more stringent borrowing terms. During brief time intervals in the fourth quarter of calendar 2008 and the first quarter of calendar 2009, there was no liquidity in the commercial paper markets, resulting in an absence of commercial paper buyers and extraordinary high interest rates on commercial paper. Persistent recessionary conditions around the world could continue to affect the cost and availability of debt. We can provide no assurance that credit market events such as those that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 will not occur again in the foreseeable future. Conditions and events in the global credit market could have a material adverse effect on our access to short-term debt and the terms and cost of that debt.
Macroeconomic conditions also impact both our customers and our suppliers. Continued recessionary conditions could result in additional job losses and business failures, which could result in our loss of certain small business customers and curtailment of spending by our retail customers. In addition, continued distress in global credit markets, business failures and other recessionary conditions could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our suppliers to meet our inventory demands. All of these macroeconomic conditions could adversely affect our sales growth, margins and overhead, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operations.
We may not be able to increasesustain our recent rate of sales by the same historic growth rates.

growth.
We have increased our store count in the past five fiscal years, growing from 3,1073,483 stores at August 31, 2002,28, 2004, to 4,0564,417 stores at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, an average store count increase per year of 5%. Additionally, we have increased annual revenues in the past five fiscal years from $5.326$5.637 billion in fiscal 20022004 to $6.170$6.817 billion in fiscal 2007,2009, an average increase per year of 3%4%. Annual revenue growth is driven by the opening of new stores and increases in same-store sales. We open new stores only after evaluating customer buying trends and market demand/needs, all of which could be adversely affected by continued job losses, wage cuts, small business failures and microeconomic conditions unique to the automotive industry. Some of our new store openings are expected to be in Mexico, where legal and political factors can adversely affect our ability to obtain sites or permits to operate new stores. Same store sales are impacted both by customer demand levels and by the prices we are able to charge for our products, which can also be negatively impacted by continued recessionary pressures. We cannot provide any assurance that we canwill continue to open stores at historical rates or increaseachieve increases in same-store sales.

Our business depends upon qualified employees.

At the end of fiscal 2007,2009, our consolidated employee count was approximately 55,000.60,000. We cannot assure that we can continue to hire and retain qualified employees at current wage rates. If we do not maintain competitive wages, our customer service could suffer by reason of a declining quality of our workforce or, alternatively, our earnings could decrease if we increase our wage rates.

10


If demand for our products slows, then our business may be materially affected.

Demand for products sold by our stores depends on many factors. In the short term, it may depend upon:

factors, including:
·the number of miles vehicles are driven annually as higher. Higher vehicle mileage increases the need for maintenance and repair. Mileage levels may be affected by gas prices and other factors.

·the number of vehicles in current service that are seven years old and older as these. These vehicles are generally no longer under the original vehicle manufacturers’ warranties and willtend to need more maintenance and repair than younger vehicles.

·the weather as. Inclement weather may cause vehicle maintenance mayto be deferred.

·the economy.economy. In periods of rapidly declining economic conditions, both retail DIY and commercial DIFM customers may defer vehicle maintenance or repair. Additionally, such conditions may affect our customers’ credit availability. During periods of expansionary economic conditions, more of our DIY customers may pay others to repair and maintain their cars instead of working on their own vehicles or they may purchase new vehicles.

11



rising energy prices. Increases in energy prices may cause our customers to defer purchases of certain of our products as they use a higher percentage of their income to pay for gasoline and other energy costs.
For the long term, demand for our products may depend upon:

the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the warranties or maintenance offered on new vehicles; and
·the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the warranty or maintenance offered on new vehicles.
restrictions on access to diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation.

All of these factors could result in immediate and longer term declines in the demand for our products, which could adversely affect our sales, cash flows and overall financial condition.
·restrictions on access to diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation.

If we are unable to compete successfully against other businesses that sell theproducts that we sell, we could lose customers and our sales and profits maydecline.

The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive and is based on many factors, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and price. Competitors are rapidly opening locations near our existing stores. AutoZone competes as a supplier in both the DIY and DIFM auto parts and accessories markets.

Competitors include national, regional and local auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers, in addition to discount and mass merchandise stores, department stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores and home stores that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories, tools and maintenance parts. Although we believe we compete effectively on the basis of customer service, including the knowledge and expertise of our AutoZoners; merchandise quality, selection and availability; product warranty; store layout, location and convenience; price; and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks; some competitors may havegain competitive advantages, such as greater financial and marketing resources, larger stores with more merchandise, longer operating histories, more frequent customer visits and more effective advertising. If we are unable to continue to develop successful competitive strategies, or if our competitors develop more effective strategies, we could lose customers and our sales and profits may decline.

If we cannot profitably increase our market share in the commercial auto partsbusiness, our sales growth may be limited.

Although we are one of the largest sellers of auto parts in the commercial market, to increase commercial sales we must compete against national and regional auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, wholesalers and jobbers, repair shops and auto dealers. Although we believe we compete effectively on the basis of customer service, merchandise quality, selection and availability, price, product warranty and distribution locations, and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks, some automotive aftermarket jobbers have been in business for substantially longer periods of time than we have, have developed long-term customer relationships and have large available inventories. We can make no assurances thatIf we canare unable to profitably develop new commercial customers, or make available inventories required by commercial customers.our sales growth may be limited.
11


If our vendors continue to consolidate, we may pay higher prices for ourmerchandise.

In recent years, several of our vendors have merged. Further vendor consolidation could limit the number of vendors from which we may purchase products and could materially affect the prices we pay for these products.

Consolidation among our competitors may negatively impact our business.

IfRecently some of our competitors consolidatehave merged. Consolidation among our competitors could enhance their financial position, provide them with other auto parts chainsthe ability to achieve better purchasing terms allowing them to provide more competitive prices to customers for whom we compete, and are ableallow them to achieve efficiencies in their mergers then there may be greater competitive pressuresthat allow for more effective use of advertising and marketing dollars and allow them to more effectively compete for customers. These consolidated competitors could take sales volume away from us in thecertain markets inand could cause us to change our pricing with a negative impact on our margins or could cause us to spend more money to maintain customers or seek new customers, all of which they are stronger.could negatively impact our business.

12



War or acts of terrorism or the threat of either, may negatively impactavailability of merchandise and adversely impact our sales.

War or acts of terrorism, or the threat of either, may have a negative impact on our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale in our stores. Some of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be negatively affected.

In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and stores.

Rising energy prices may negatively impact our profitability.

As mentioned above, rising energy prices may impact demand for the products that we sell, overall transaction count and our profitability. Higher energy prices impact our merchandise distribution, commercial delivery, utility and product costs.

Our largest stockholder, as a result of its voting ownership, may have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders.
Demand forAs of October 19, 2009, ESL Investments, Inc. and certain of its investment affiliates (together, “ESL”) beneficially owned approximately 40% of the outstanding shares of our merchandisecommon stock. As a result, ESL may decline if vehicle manufacturers refusehave the ability to make availableexert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders, including the informationelection of directors and any transactions involving a change of control.
In the future, ESL may acquire or sell shares of common stock and thereby increase or decrease its ownership stake in us. Significant fluctuations in their level of ownership could have an impact on our customers need to work on their own vehicles.share price.

Demand for our merchandise may decline if vehicle manufacturers refuse to make available to the automotive aftermarket industry diagnostic, repair and maintenance information that our customers, both retail (“DIY”) and commercial (“DIFM”In June 2008, we entered into an agreement with ESL (the “ESL Agreement”), requirein which ESL has agreed to diagnose, repairvote shares of our common stock owned by ESL in excess of 40% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. Following the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company for the fiscal year ending on August 29, 2009, the applicable percentage threshold is reduced from 40% to 37.5% of the then outstanding common stock. Additionally, under the terms of the agreement, the Company added two directors in August 2008 that were identified by ESL. William C. Crowley, one of the two appointed directors, is the President and maintain their vehicles. Without public disseminationChief Operating Officer of ESL Investments, Inc. The ESL Agreement is filed as Exhibit 10.22 to this information, consumers may be forced to have all diagnostic work, repairs and maintenance performed by the vehicle manufacturers' dealer network.Form 10-K.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
None.

Item 2. Properties

The following table reflects the square footage and number of leased and owned properties for our stores as of August 25, 2007:29, 2009:
        
 
No. of Stores 
 
Square Footage 
  No. of Stores Square Footage 
Leased
  1,873  11,250,612  2,171 13,494,994 
Owned
  
2,183
  
14,793,581
  2,246 15,055,332 
     
Total
  
4,056
  
26,044,193
  4,417 28,550,326 
     
We have over 3.44.0 million square feet in distribution centers servicing our stores, of which approximately 1.3 million square feet is leased and the remainder is owned. Our distribution centers are located in Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Mexico. Our primary store support center, which we own, is located in Memphis, Tennessee, and consists of approximately 260,000 square feet. We also own and lease other properties that are not material in the aggregate.

13


12

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit entitled "Coalition“Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc. et al.," filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2004. The case was filed by more than 200 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers (collectively “Plaintiffs”), against a number of defendants, including automotive aftermarket retailers and aftermarket automotive parts manufacturers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that some or all of the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants have knowingly received, in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (the “Act”), from various of the manufacturer defendants benefits such as volume discounts, rebates, early buy allowances and other allowances, fees, inventory without payment, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers'manufacturers’ profits, benefits of pay on scan purchases, implementation of radio frequency identification technology, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers. Additionally, a subset of plaintiffs alleges a claim of fraud against the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants based on discovery issues in a prior litigation involving similar Robinson-Patman Act claims. In the prior litigation, the discovery dispute, as well as the underlying claims, were decided in favor of AutoZone and the other automotive aftermarket retailer defendants who proceeded to trial, pursuant to a unanimous jury verdict which was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the current litigation, plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages (including statutory trebling), attorneys'attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting the aftermarket retailer defendants from inducing and/or knowingly receiving discriminatory prices from any of the aftermarket manufacturer defendants and from opening up any further stores to compete with plaintiffs as long as defendants allegedly continue to violate the Act. The Company believes this suit to be without merit and is vigorously defending against it. The Company is unable to estimate a loss or possible range of loss as of August 29, 2009. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss all claims with prejudice on substantive and procedural grounds. Additionally, the Defendants have sought to enjoin plaintiffs from filing similar lawsuits in the future. If granted in their entirety, these dispositive motions would resolve the litigation in Defendants'Defendants’ favor.

On June 22, 2005, the Attorney General of the State of California, in conjunction with District Attorneys for San Bernardino, San Joaquin and Monterey Counties, filed suit in the San Bernardino County Superior Court against AutoZone, Inc. and its California subsidiaries. The San Diego County District Attorney later joined the suit. The lawsuit alleges that AutoZone failed to follow various state statutes and regulation governing the storage and handling of used motor oil and other materials collected for recycling or used for cleaning AutoZone stores and parking lots. The suit sought $12 million in penalties and injunctive relief. On June 1, 2007, AutoZone and the State entered into a Stipulated Final Judgment by Consent. The Stipulated Final Judgment amended the suit to also allege weights and measures (pricing) violations. Pursuant to this Judgment, AutoZone is enjoined from committing these types of violations and agreed to pay civil penalties in the amount of $1.8 million, including $1.5 million in cash and a $300,000 credit for work performed to insure compliance.

AutoZone is involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. Although the amount of liability that may result from these other proceedings cannot be ascertained, we do not currently believe that, in the aggregate, they will result in liabilities material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.

14


13


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

AutoZone’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AZO.” On October 15, 2007,19, 2009, there were 3,5893,381 stockholders of record, which does not include the number of beneficial owners whose shares were represented by security position listings.

We currently do not pay a cash dividend on our common stock. Any payment of dividends in the future would be dependent upon our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings, cash flow and other factors.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the periods indicated:
 
Price Range of Common Stock 
         
 
High 
 
Low 
  Price Range of Common Stock 
Fiscal Year Ended August 25, 2007:     
 High Low 
Fiscal Year Ended August 29, 2009: 
Fourth quarter $140.29 $111.46  $164.38 $141.00 
Third quarter $137.66 $121.52  $169.99 $129.21 
Second quarter $128.00 $112.39  $145.77 $92.52 
First quarter $114.98 $87.30  $143.80 $84.66 
        
Fiscal Year Ended August 26, 2006:       
Fiscal Year Ended August 30, 2008: 
Fourth quarter 
$
94.61
 
$
83.81
  $142.49 $110.39 
Third quarter 
$
102.00
 
$
91.35
  $126.85 $108.89 
Second quarter 
$
99.32
 
$
86.50
  $132.44 $103.07 
First quarter 
$
97.08
 
$
77.76
  $125.75 $107.10 
During 1998 the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The program was most recentlylast amended in June 2007,2009, to increase the repurchase authorization to $5.9$7.9 billion from $5.4$7.4 billion. The program does not have an expiration date.

Shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, were as follows:

                 
          Total Number of  Maximum Dollar 
          Shares Purchased  Value that May Yet 
  Total Number  Average  as Part of Publicly  Be Purchased 
  of Shares  Price Paid  Announced Plans  Under the Plans or 
Period Purchased  per Share  or Programs  Programs 
May 10, 2009, to June 6, 2009  437,000  $155.54   437,000  $828,506,506 
June 7, 2009, to July 4, 2009  1,783,355  $155.45   1,783,355   551,279,167 
July 5, 2009, to August 1, 2009  1,204,593  $153.87   1,204,593   365,934,289 
August 2, 2009, to August 29, 2009  386,308  $147.17   386,308   309,082,914 
                 
Total  3,811,256  $154.12   3,811,256  $309,082,914 

15


 
Period
 
 
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased
 
 
 
Average Price Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Dollar Value that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
 
May 6, 2007, to
June 2, 2007
  
816,200
 
$
127.84
  
97,809,493
 
$
651,360,893
 
June 3, 2007, to
June 30, 2007
  
1,444,560
  
133.66
  
99,254,053
  
458,281,384
 
July 1, 2007, to
July 28, 2007
  
-
  
-
  
99,254,053
  
458,281,384
 
July 29, 2007, to
August 25, 2007
  
-
  
-
  
99,254,053
  
458,281,384
 
 
Total
  
2,260,760
 
$
131.56
  
99,254,053
 
$
458,281,384
 

The Company also repurchased, at fair value, an additional 37,190 shares in fiscal 2009, 39,235 shares in fiscal 2008, and 65,152 shares in fiscal 2007 62,293 shares in fiscal 2006, and 87,974 shares in fiscal 2005 from employees electing to sell their stock under the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, under which all eligible employees may purchase AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last day of each calendar quarter through payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per employee or 10 percent of compensation, whichever is less. Under the plan, 29,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2009, 36,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2008, and 39,139 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2007, 51,167 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2006, and 59,479 shares were sold in fiscal 2005.2007. At August 25, 2007, 385,89729, 2009, 320,603 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan. Under the Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan all eligible executives are permitted to purchase AutoZone’s common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases by executives under this plan were 1,705 shares in fiscal 2009, 1,793 shares in fiscal 2008, and 1,257 shares in fiscal 2007, 811 shares in fiscal 2006, and 5,366 shares in fiscal 2005.2007. At August 25, 2007, 263,03729, 2009, 259,539 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan.
14


Stock Performance Graph
This graph shows, from the end of fiscal year 20022004 to the end of fiscal year 2007,2009, changes in the value of $100 invested in each of the following: AutoZone’s common stock, Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index, and a peer group consisting of other automotive aftermarket retailers.


 
Aug-02
 
Aug-03
 
Aug-04
 
Aug-05
 
Aug-06
 
Aug-07
                         
Company Name / Index 8/28/04 8/27/05 8/26/06 8/25/07 8/30/08 8/29/09 
AutoZone, Inc.  100 126.88 104.16 131.93 120.54 170.37  100 126.66 115.72 163.56 182.10 196.99 
S&P 500 Index  100 112.07 125.30 138.83 152.05 176.88  100 110.80 121.35 141.16 124.98 103.00 
Peer Group  100 115.32 125.85 164.71 146.05 178.66  100 130.88 116.05 141.96 133.43 140.88 
The peer group consists of Advance Auto Parts, Inc,Inc., CSK Auto Corporation (through 7/11/08), Genuine Parts Company, O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., and The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack.

16


15

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

                     
(in thousands, except per share data and selected Fiscal Year Ended August 
operating data) 2009(2)  2008(1)(2)  2007(2)  2006(2)  2005(3) 
                     
Income Statement Data
                    
Net sales $6,816,824  $6,522,706  $6,169,804  $5,948,355  $5,710,882 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses  3,400,375   3,254,645   3,105,554   3,009,835   2,918,334 
                
Gross profit  3,416,449   3,268,061   3,064,250   2,938,520   2,792,548 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses  2,240,387   2,143,927   2,008,984   1,928,595   1,816,884 
                
Operating profit  1,176,062   1,124,134   1,055,266   1,009,925   975,664 
Interest expense — net  142,316   116,745   119,116   107,889   102,443 
                
Income before income taxes  1,033,746   1,007,389   936,150   902,036   873,221 
Income taxes  376,697   365,783   340,478   332,761   302,202 
                
Net income $657,049  $641,606  $595,672  $569,275  $571,019 
                
                     
Diluted earnings per share $11.73  $10.04  $8.53  $7.50  $7.18 
                
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  55,992   63,875   69,844   75,859   79,508 
                
                     
Same Store Sales
                    
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store net sales(4)
  4.4%  0.4%  0.1%  0.4%  (2.1)%
                     
Balance Sheet Data
                    
Current assets $2,561,730  $2,586,301  $2,270,455  $2,118,927  $1,929,459 
Working capital (deficit)  (145,022)  66,981   (15,439)  64,359   118,300 
Total assets  5,318,405   5,257,112   4,804,709   4,526,306   4,245,257 
Current liabilities  2,706,752   2,519,320   2,285,895   2,054,568   1,811,159 
Debt  2,726,900   2,250,000   1,935,618   1,857,157   1,861,850 
Long-term capital leases  38,029   48,144   39,073       
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) $(433,074) $229,687  $403,200  $469,528  $391,007 
                     
Selected Operating Data
                    
Number of domestic stores at beginning of year  4,092   3,933   3,771   3,592   3,420 
                
New stores  140   160   163   185   175 
Closed stores  3   1   1   6   3 
                
Net new stores  137   159   162   179   172 
                
Relocated stores  9   14   18   18   7 
                
Number of domestic stores at end of year  4,229   4,092   3,933   3,771   3,592 
Number of Mexico stores at end of year  188   148   123   100   81 
                
Number of total stores at end of year  4,417   4,240   4,056   3,871   3,673 
                
Total store square footage (in thousands)  28,550   27,291   26,044   24,713   23,369 
Average square footage per store  6,464   6,437   6,421   6,384   6,362 
Increase in store square footage  5%  5%  5%  6%  6%
Inventory per store $500  $507  $495  $477  $453 
Average net sales per store (in thousands) $1,575  $1,572  $1,557  $1,577  $1,596 
Average net sales per store square foot $239  $239  $237  $241  $244 
Total employees at end of year (in thousands)  60   57   55   53   52 
Merchandise under pay-on-scan arrangements (in thousands) $3,530  $6,732  $22,387  $92,142  $151,682 
Inventory turnover(5)
  1.5x  1.6x  1.6x  1.7x  1.8x
Accounts payable to inventory ratio  96.0%  95.0%  93.2%  92.0%  92.5%
After-tax return on invested capital (6)
  24.4%  24.0%  22.7%  22.2%  23.9%
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR(7)
  2.5   2.2   2.1   2.1   2.1 
Net cash provided by operating activities (in thousands) $923,808  $921,100  $845,194  $822,747  $648,083 
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt (in thousands)(8)
 $673,347  $690,621  $678,522  $599,507  $432,210 
  
Fiscal Year Ended August 
 
(in thousands, except per share data and
selected operating data)
 
2007(1)
 
2006(1)
 
2005(2)
 
2004(3) 
 
2003(4)
 
Income Statement Data           
Net sales 
$
6,169,804
 
$
5,948,355
 
$
5,710,882
 
$
5,637,025
 
$
5,457,123
 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses  
3,105,554
  
3,009,835
  
2,918,334
  
2,880,446
  
2,942,114
 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses  
2,008,984
  
1,928,595
  
1,816,884
  
1,757,873
  
1,597,212
 
Operating profit  1,055,266  1,009,925  975,664  998,706  917,797 
Interest expense - net  119,116  107,889  102,443  92,804  84,790 
Income before income taxes  936,150  902,036  873,221  905,902  833,007 
Income taxes  340,478  332,761  302,202  339,700  315,403 
Net income $595,672 $569,275 $571,019 $566,202 $517,604 
Diluted earnings per share 
$
8.53
 $7.50 $7.18 $6.56 $5.34 
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  
69,844
  
75,859
  
79,508
  
86,350
  
96,963
 
                 
Balance Sheet Data                
Current assets 
$
2,270,455
 
$
2,118,927
 
$
1,929,459
 
$
1,755,757
 
$
1,671,354
 
Working capital (deficit)  (15,439) 64,359  118,300  4,706  (40,050)
Total assets  4,804,709  4,526,306  4,245,257  3,912,565  3,766,826 
Current liabilities  2,285,894  2,054,568  1,811,159  1,751,051  1,711,404 
Debt  1,935,618  1,857,157  1,861,850  1,869,250  1,546,845 
Long-term capital leases  39,073         
Stockholders’ equity $403,200 $469,528 $391,007 $171,393 $373,758 
                 
Selected Operating Data                
Number of domestic stores at beginning of year  
3,771
  
3,592
  
3,420
  
3,219
  
3,068
 
New stores  163  185  175  202  160 
Closed stores  1  6  3  1  9 
Net new stores  162  179  172  201  151 
Relocated stores  18  18  7  4  6 
Number of domestic stores at end of year  3,933  3,771  3,592  3,420  3,219 
Number of Mexico stores at end of year  123  100  81  63  49 
Number of total stores at end of year  4,056  3,871  3,673  3,483  3,268 
Total domestic store square footage (in thousands)  25,135  24,016  22,808  21,689  20,500 
Average square footage per domestic store  6,391  6,369  6,350  6,342  6,368 
Increase in domestic store square footage  5% 5% 5% 6% 4%
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store net sales(5)
  0.1% 0.4% (2.1)% 0.1% 3.2%
Average net sales per domestic store (in thousands) $1,523 $1,548 $1,573 $1,647 $1,689 
Average net sales per domestic store square foot $239 $243 $248 $259 $264 
Total domestic employees at end of year  54,859  52,677  50,869  48,294  47,727 
Merchandise under pay-on-scan arrangements (in thousands) $22,387 $92,142 $151,682 $146,573 $ 
Inventory turnover(6)
  1.6x  1.7x  1.8x  1.9x  2.0x 
After-tax return on invested capital (7)
  22.7% 22.2% 23.9% 25.1% 23.4%
Net cash provided by operating activities (in thousands) $845,194 $822,747 $648,083 $638,379 $720,807 
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt (in thousands)(8)
 $678,522 $599,507 $432,210 $509,447 $561,563 
Return on average equity  137% 132% 203% 208% 97%

(1)
Fiscal 2007 operating results include a $18.5 million pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation, and fiscal 2006 operating results contain a $17.4 million pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation as
(1)Consisted of 53 weeks.
(2)As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) at the beginningin fiscal 2006, operating results include a pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation of $19.1 million in fiscal 2009, $18.4 million in fiscal 2008, $18.5 million in fiscal 2007, and $17.4 million in fiscal 2006.

17



(2)
(3)Fiscal 2005 operating results include a $40.3 million pre-tax non-cash charge related to lease accounting, which includes the impact on prior years and reflects additional amortization of leasehold improvements and additional rent expense, and a $21.3 million income tax benefit from the repatriation of earnings from our Mexican operations and other discrete income tax items.

(3)
(4)
Fiscal 2004 operating results include $42.1 million in pre-tax gains from warranty negotiations with certain vendors.
16

(4)
Fiscal 2003 operating results include $8.7 million in pre-tax gains from warranty negotiations, a $4.7 million pre-tax gain associated with the settlement of certain liabilities and the repayment of a note associated with the sale of the TruckPro business in December 2001, and a $4.6 million pre-tax gain as a result of the disposition of properties associated with the 2001 restructuring and impairment charges.

(5)
The domestic comparable sales increases (decreases) are based on sales for all domestic stores open at least one year.
Relocated Stores are included in the same store sales computation based on the year the original store was opened. Closed store sales are included in the same store sales computation up to the week it closes, and excluded from the computation for all periods subsequent to closing.

(6)
(5)
Inventory turnover is calculated as cost of sales divided by the average ofmerchandise inventory balance over the beginning and ending recorded merchandise inventories, which excludes merchandise under pay-on-scan arrangements.year. The calculation includes cost of sales related to pay-on-scan sales, which were $5.8 million for the 52 weeks ended August 29, 2009, $19.2 million for the 53 weeks ended August 30, 2008, $85.4 million for the 52 weeks ended August 25, 2007, $198.1 million for the 52 weeks ended August 26, 2006, and $234.6 million for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2005, and $83.2 million for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2004.2005.

(7)
(6)
After-tax return on invested capital is calculated as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent and restructuring and impairment charges) divided by average invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(8)
(7)
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is calculated as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times six; divided by net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, rent and stock option expenses. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(8)Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt is calculated as the change in cash and cash equivalents less the change in debt plus treasury stock purchases. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

18


17


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Resultsof Operations

We are the nation’s leading specialty retailer and a leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories, with most of our sales to do-it-yourself (“DIY”) customers.accessories. We began operations in 1979 and as ofat August 25, 2007,29, 2009, operated 3,9334,229 stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 123188 in Mexico. Each of our stores carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. In manyAt August 29, 2009, in 2,303 of our stores we also have a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and service stations.public sector accounts. We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, we sell diagnostic and repair information and automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products through www.autozone.com.www.autozone.com, and as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation.installation services.
Executive Summary
We achieved a solid performance in fiscal 2009, delivering record earnings of $657 million and sales growth of $420 million over the prior year, excluding the 53rd week in last year’s results. We completed the year with strong growth in our commercial and retail businesses. We are excited about our retail business opportunities and encouraged by the increase in our commercial business, where we continued to build our internal sales force and to refine our parts assortment. There are various factors occuring within the current economy that affect both our customers and our industry, including the credit crisis and higher unemployment, which we believe when combined have aided our sales growth during the year. We continue to believe we are well positioned to help our customers save money and meet their needs in a challenging macro economic environment.
The two statistics we believe have the closest correlation to our market growth over the long-term are miles driven and the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road. Miles driven declined for the sixteenth straight month in March, were relatively flat in April and May before increasing in June and July. We are optimistic that over the long-term this trend will stabilize at low single digit increases as the number of vehicles on the road continues to increase.
New vehicle sales declined significantly during 2008 and the first half of 2009, which we believe is contributing to an increasing number of “seven year old or older” vehicles on the road. In the near term, we expect this trend to continue, as consumers keep their cars longer in an effort to save money during this uncertain economy. Also, we believe gas prices impact our customers’ behavior with respect to driving and maintaining their cars. With approximately ten billion gallons of unleaded gas consumed each month across the United States, each $1 dollar decrease at the pump contributes approximately $10 billion of additional spending capacity to consumers each month. During the summer of 2008, gas prices peaked at roughly $4 per gallon, before falling to $2 per gallon in February 2009. By the end of fiscal 2009, gas prices had risen to approximately $2.61 per gallon.
During fiscal 2009, we worked hard to execute on several key initiatives as the macro environment turned in our industry’s favor and we saw an increase in traffic in our stores.
We significantly enhanced the utilization of our hub stores by refining and improving the product assortment in these locations while simultaneously increasing the delivery frequency to nearby stores. We accelerated our store maintenance efforts and also deployed additional capital in areas that we expect to yield benefits in the future, such as enhancing our IT infrastructure and continued additions of late model products. We also began an effort to purchase more of our new store locations rather than leasing them. Finally, we maintained our focus on developing a first class Commercial field sales organization by continuing to expand the size of our team and investing in training, tools and management programs.
In this challenging environment, we continue to see sales of maintenance and failure categories perform well, while discretionary categories are being negatively impacted. Consequently, we remain focused on refining and expanding our product assortment to ensure we have the “best” merchandise at the “right” price in each of our merchandise categories.

19


Results of Operations

Fiscal 20072009 Compared with Fiscal 2006

2008
For the year ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, AutoZone reported net sales of $6.170$6.817 billion compared with $5.948$6.523 billion for the year ended August 26, 2006,30, 2008, a 3.7%4.5% increase from fiscal 2006.2008. Excluding $125.9 million of sales from the 53rd week included in the prior year, total company net sales increased 6.6%. This growth was driven primarily driven by an increase in the numberdomestic same store sales of open stores. 4.4% and sales from new stores of $165.5 million. The improvement in same store sales was driven by an improvement in transaction count trends, while increases in average transaction value remained generally consistent with our long-term trends. Higher transaction value is attributable to product inflation due to both more complex, costly products and commodity price increases.
At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, we operated 3,9334,229 domestic stores and 123188 stores in Mexico, compared with 3,7714,092 domestic stores and 100148 stores in Mexico at August 26, 2006. Domestic30, 2008. Excluding the sales from the 53rd week in the prior year, domestic retail sales increased 3.4%7.1% and domestic commercial sales decreased 0.4% from prior year. ALLDATA and Mexico sales increased over prior year, contributing 0.9 percentage points of the total increase in net sales. Domestic same store sales, or sales for domestic stores open at least one year, increased 0.1% from the prior year.

4.3%.
Gross profit for fiscal 20072009 was $3.064$3.416 billion, or 49.7%50.1% of net sales, compared with $2.939$3.268 billion, or 49.4%50.1% of net sales for fiscal 2006. The improvement2008. Gross profit as a percent of net sales was positively impacted by favorable distribution costs from improved efficiencies and lower fuel costs. However, this favorability was largely offset by a shift in gross profitmix to lower margin was primarily attributable to ongoing category management initiatives and supply chain efficiencies.

products.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 20072009 increased to $2.009$2.240 billion, or 32.6%32.9% of net sales, from $1.929$2.144 billion, or 32.4%32.9% of net sales for fiscal 2006. The increase in2008. Leverage from increased sales was largely offset by expenses is driven primarily by higher occupancy cost versus the prior year.

associated with our continued enhancements to our hub stores, an acceleration of our store maintenance program, and a continued expansion of our Commercial sales force.
Interest expense, net for fiscal 20072009 was $119.1$142.3 million compared with $107.9$116.7 million during fiscal 2006.2008. This increase was primarily due to higher short term rates and higher average borrowing levels over the comparable prior year period and the recognitiona higher percentage of interest expense on capital lease obligations that were accounted for as operating leases prior to a modification to the lease agreements in fiscal 2007.fixed rate debt. Average borrowings for fiscal 20072009 were $1.972$2.460 billion, compared with $1.928$2.024 billion for fiscal 2006. Weighted2008 and weighted average borrowing rates were 5.7% at August 25, 2007,5.4% for fiscal 2009, compared to 5.5% at August 26, 2006.5.2% for fiscal 2008.

Our effective income tax rate decreased towas 36.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2007 as2009 compared to 36.9%36.3% for fiscal 2006primarily due to benefits from changes in our pre-tax earnings mix and an increase in certain federal and state tax credits.2008. Refer to "Note“Note D - Income Taxes"Taxes” for additional information regarding our income tax rate.

Net income for fiscal 20072009 increased by 4.6%2.4% to $595.7$657.0 million, and diluted earnings per share increased by 13.6%16.8% to $8.53$11.73 from $7.50$10.04 in fiscal 2006.2008. The impact of the fiscal 20072009 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20072009 was an increase of approximately $0.14.

$0.78. Excluding the additional week in the prior year, net income for the year increased 5.0% over the previous year, while diluted earnings per share increased 19.7%.
18


Fiscal 20062008 Compared with Fiscal 2005

2007
For the year ended August 26, 2006,30, 2008, AutoZone reported net sales of $5.948$6.523 billion compared with $5.711$6.170 billion for the year ended August 27, 2005,25, 2007, a 4.2%5.7% increase from fiscal 2005.2007. This growth was primarily driven by net sales of $166.6 million for fiscal 2008 from new stores, $125.9 million, or a 1.9% increase, from the addition of the 53rd week and a domestic same store sales (excluding 53rd week) increase of 0.4%. At August 30, 2008, we operated 4,092 domestic stores and 148 in Mexico, compared with 3,933 domestic stores and 123 in Mexico at August 25, 2007. The domestic same store sales increase was driven by higher average transaction value, partially offset by lower transaction count. Higher transaction value was primarily attributable to product price inflation due both to more complex, costly products and to commodity price increases. Transaction counts were lower due to a combination of factors, including product life cycles and deferred maintenance. Including the 53rd week, domestic retail sales increased 4.5% and domestic commercial sales increased 6.8% from prior year. ALLDATA and Mexico sales, including the 53rd week, increased over prior year, contributing 1.2 percentage points of the total increase in net sales.
Gross profit for fiscal 2008 was $3.268 billion, or 50.1% of net sales, compared with $3.064 billion, or 49.7% of net sales, for fiscal 2007. The increase in gross profit as a percent of net sales was primarily due to an approximately 50 basis point benefit from category management efforts, including increases in average retail prices of products soldand vendor supported promotional activities. These efforts were partially offset by increased distribution expense principally relating to higher fuel costs.

20


Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 increased to $2.144 billion, or 32.9% of net sales, from $2.009 billion, or 32.6% of net sales for fiscal 2007. Approximately 20 basis points of the increase in operating expenses, as a percentage of sales, was due to higher employee medical expense driven by an increase in the number of open stores. At August 26, 2006, we operated 3,771 domestic stores and 100 in Mexico, compared with 3,592 domestic stores and 81 in Mexico at August 27, 2005. Domestic Retail salescatastrophic claims. The remaining increase was primarily due to higher fuel expense for our commercial fleet from increased 4.0% and domestic commercial sales decreased 1.3% from prior year. ALLDATA and Mexico sales increased over prior year, contributing 0.9 percentagefuel prices (approximately 6 basis points of the total increase. Same store sales, or sales for domestic stores open at least one year, increased 0.4% from the prior year.

Gross profit for fiscal 2006 was $2.939 billion, or 49.4% of net sales, compared with $2.793 billion, or 48.9% of net sales, for fiscal 2005. The improvement in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to ongoing category management initiatives, partially off-set by increases in certain commodity costs. Our ongoing category management initiatives have included continued optimization of merchandise assortment and pricing, management of procurement costs, and an increasing focus on direct importing initiatives.

Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2006 increased to $1.929 billion, or 32.4% of net sales, from $1.817 billion, or 31.8% of net sales for fiscal 2005. Expenses for fiscal 2005 include a $40.3 million charge related to accounting for leases (see “Note J - Leases”)increase). Expenses for fiscal 2006 include $17.4 million in share-based compensation expense resulting from the current year adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (see “Note B - Share-Based Payments”). The remaining increase in expenses is driven by initiatives to improve the customer’s shopping experience and higher occupancy costs driven largely by the opening of new stores. These initiatives continue to include expanded hours of operation, enhanced training programs and ensuring clean, well-merchandised stores.

Interest expense, net for fiscal 20062008 was $107.9$116.7 million compared with $102.4$119.1 million during fiscal 2005.2007. This increasedecrease was primarily due to alower short-term rates and was offset by higher average borrowing rate, partially offset by lower average borrowing levels.levels over the comparable fiscal 2007 period and the impact of the additional week in fiscal 2008. Average borrowings for fiscal 20062008 were $1.928$2.024 billion, compared with $1.970$1.972 billion for fiscal 2005.2007. Weighted average borrowing rates were 5.5% at August 26, 2006, compared to 5.2% at August 27, 2005. The increase in interest rates reflects both the ongoing effort30, 2008, compared to extend the terms of our borrowings, as well as the impact from increased short-term rates.5.7% at August 25, 2007.

Our effective income tax rate increased to 36.9%was 36.3% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2006 as2008 compared to 34.6%36.4% for fiscal 2005. The fiscal 2005 effective income tax rate reflects $21.3 million in tax benefits related to the repatriation of Mexican earnings as a result of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (see “Note D - Income Taxes”), and other discrete income tax items.

2007.
Net income for fiscal 2006 decreased2008 increased by 0.3%7.7% to $569.3$641.6 million, and diluted earnings per share increased by 4.5%17.8% to $7.50$10.04 from $7.18$8.53 in fiscal 2005.2007. The impact of the fiscal 20062008 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20062008 was an increase of approximately $0.09.$0.29. Excluding the additional week, net income for the year increased 5.1% over the previous year to $625.8 million, while diluted earnings per share increased 14.9% to $9.80 per share.
Seasonality and Quarterly Periods

AutoZone’s business is somewhat seasonal in nature, with the highest sales typically occurring in the spring and summer months of March through August,September, in which average weekly per-store sales historically have been about 15% to 25% higher than in the slower months of December through February. During short periods of time, a store’s sales can be affected by weather conditions. Extremely hot or extremely cold weather may enhance sales by causing parts to fail and spurring sales of seasonal products. Mild or rainy weather tends to soften sales, as parts failure rates are lower in mild weather, andwith elective maintenance is deferred during periods of rainy weather. Over the longer term, the effects of weather balance out, as we have stores throughout the United States, Puerto Rico and Mexico.

Each of the first three quarters of AutoZone’s fiscal year consistsconsisted of 12 weeks, and the fourth quarter consistsconsisted of 16 weeks.weeks in 2009, 17 weeks in 2008, and 16 weeks in 2007. Because the fourth quarter contains the seasonally high sales volume and consists of 16 or 17 weeks, compared with 12 weeks for each of the first three quarters, our fourth quarter represents a disproportionate share of the annual net sales and net income. The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, containing 16 weeks, represented 32.7% of annual sales and 35.9% of net income; the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, containing 17 weeks, represented 33.9% of annual sales and 38.0% of net income; and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, containing 16 weeks, represented 32.5% of annual sales and 36.5% of net income; the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 represented 32.6% of annual sales and 37.5% of net income; and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 represented 33.0% of annual sales and 36.2% of net income.

19


Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $845.2 million in fiscal 2007, $822.7 million in fiscal 2006, and $648.1 million in fiscal 2005. The primary source of our liquidity is our cash flows realized through the sale of automotive parts and accessories. Our new store development program requires working capital, predominantly for inventories. DuringNet cash provided by operating activities was $923.8 million in fiscal 2009, $921.1 million in fiscal 2008, and $845.2 million in fiscal 2007. The increase over prior year was primarily due to the past threegrowth in net income and to a lesser extent, timing of income tax payments and deductions, and improvements in our accounts payable to inventory ratio as our vendors continue to finance a large portion of our inventory. Partially offsetting this increase were higher accounts receivable and the 53rd week of income in last year’s sales. The increase in fiscal years, we have maintained2008 verses fiscal 2007 was due primarily to higher net income and an increase in our accounts payable to inventory ratio. We had an accounts payable to inventory ratio of 96% at August 29, 2009, 95% at August 30, 2008, and 93% at August 25, 2007, 92% at August 26, 2006,2007. Our inventory increases are primarily attributable to an increased number of stores and 93% at August 27, 2005. The increaseto a lesser extent, our efforts to update product assortment in merchandise inventories, required to support new store development and sales growth, has largely been financed byall of our stores. Additionally, many of our vendors as evidencedhave supported our initiative to update our product assortment by ourproviding extended payment terms. These extended payment terms have allowed us to grow accounts payable to inventory ratio. Contributing to this ratio is the use of pay-on-scan (“POS”) arrangements with certain vendors. Underat a POS arrangement, AutoZone will not purchase merchandise supplied by a vendor until that merchandise is ultimately sold to AutoZone’s customers. Upon the sale of the merchandise to AutoZone’s customers, AutoZone recognizes the liability for the goods and pays the vendor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. Revenues under POS arrangements are included in net sales in the income statement. Since we do not own merchandise under POS arrangements until just before it is sold to a customer, such merchandise is not included in our balance sheet. Merchandise under POS arrangements was $22.4 million at August 25, 2007.faster rate than inventory.

21



AutoZone’s primary capital requirement has been the funding of its continued new store development program. From the beginning of fiscal 20052007 to August 25, 2007,29, 2009, we have opened 573 net551 new stores. Net cash flows used in investing activities were $263.7 million in fiscal 2009, compared to $243.2 million in fiscal 2008, and $228.7 million in fiscal 2007,2007. We invested $272.2 million in capital assets in fiscal 2009, compared to $268.3$243.6 million in fiscal 2006 and $282.8 millioncapital assets in fiscal 2005. We invested2008, and $224.5 million in capital assets in fiscal 2007, compared to $263.6 million2007. The increase in capital assetsexpenditures in fiscal 20062009 was primarily attributable to the types of stores opened and $283.5 millionincreased investment in fiscal 2005.our existing stores. New store openings were 180 for fiscal 2009, 185 for fiscal 2008, and 186 for fiscal 2007, 204 for fiscal 2006, and 193 for fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006, we began investing2007. We invest a portion of our assets held by the Company’s wholly owned insurance captive in marketable securities. We acquired $94.6$48.4 million of marketable securities in fiscal 2007 and acquired $160.02009, $54.3 million in fiscal 2006.2008, and $94.6 million in fiscal 2007. We had proceeds from matured marketable securities of $46.3 million in fiscal 2009, $50.7 million in fiscal 2008, and $86.9 million in fiscal 2007 and $145.4 million in fiscal 2006.2007. Capital asset disposals provided $10.7 million in fiscal 2009, $4.0 million in fiscal 2008, and $3.5 million in fiscal 2007, $9.8 million in fiscal 2006, and $3.8 million for fiscal 2005.

2007.
Net cash used in financing activities was $806.9 million in fiscal 2009, $522.7 million in fiscal 2008, and $621.4 million in fiscal 2007, $537.7 million in fiscal 2006, and $367.4 million in fiscal 2005.2007. The net cash used in financing activities is primarily attributable toreflected purchases of treasury stock which totaled $1.3 billion for fiscal 2009, $849.2 million for fiscal 2008, and $761.9 million for fiscal 2007, $578.1 million for fiscal 2006, and $426.9 million for fiscal 2005.2007. The treasury stock purchases in fiscal 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 were primarily funded by cash flow from operations, and at times, by increases in debt levels.

Proceeds from issuance of debt were $500.0 million for fiscal 2009, $750.0 million for fiscal 2008, and none for fiscal 2007. Debt repayments totaled $300.7 million for fiscal 2009, $229.8 million for fiscal 2008, and $5.8 million for fiscal 2007. As discussed in “Note H-Financing”, in July 2009, we issued $500.0 million in 5.75% Senior Notes due 2015. The proceeds from the issuance of debt were used to repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness, to prepay our $300 million term loan in August 2009 and for general corporate purposes, including for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, new store openings and stock repurchases. Net proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper were $277.6 million for fiscal 2009 and $84.3 million for fiscal 2007. For fiscal 2008, net repayments of commercial paper were $206.7 million.
We expect to invest in our business consistent with historical rates during fiscal 2008,2010, primarily related to our new store development program and enhancements to existing stores and systems.infrastructure. In addition to the building and land costs, our new store development program requires working capital, predominantly for inventories. Historically, we have negotiated extended payment terms from suppliers, reducing the working capital required. We believe that we will be ableplan to continue to finance much ofleveraging our inventory requirements through favorable payment termspurchases; however, our ability to do so may be impacted by a prolonged tightening of the credit markets which may directly limit our vendors’ capacity to factor their receivables from suppliers.

us.
Depending on the timing and magnitude of our future investments (either in the form of leased or purchased properties or acquisitions), we anticipate that we will rely primarily on internally generated funds and available borrowing capacity to support a majority of our capital expenditures, working capital requirements and stock repurchases. The balance may be funded through new borrowings. We anticipate that we will be able to obtain such financing in view of our credit rating and favorable experiences in the debt markets in the past.

Credit Ratings
At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, AutoZone had a senior unsecured debt credit rating from Standard & Poor’s of BBB+BBB and a commercial paper rating of A-2. Moody’s Investors Service had assigned usthe Company a senior unsecured debt credit rating of Baa2 and a commercial paper rating of P-2. Fitch Ratings assigned the Company a BBB rating for senior unsecured debt and an F-2 rating for commercial paper. As of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, Moody’s, and Standard & Poor’s and Fitch had AutoZone listed as having a “stable” outlook. If our credit ratings drop, our interest expense maywill increase; similarly, we anticipate that our interest expense may decrease if our investment ratings are raised. If our commercial paper ratings drop below current levels, we may have difficulty continuing to utilize the commercial paper market and our interest expense will likely increase, as we will then be required to access more expensive bank lines of credit. If our senior unsecured debt ratings drop below investment grade, our access to financing may become more limited.

22


20


Debt Facilities
We maintainIn July, 2009, we terminated our $1.0 billion of revolving credit facilitiesfacility, which was scheduled to expire in fiscal 2010, and replaced it with a group of banksan $800 million revolving credit facility. This credit facility is available to primarily support commercial paper borrowings, letters of credit and other short-term unsecured bank loans. These facilities expire in May 2010,The credit facility may be increased to $1.3$1.0 billion at AutoZone’s election and subject to bank credit capacity and approval, may include up to $200 million in letters of credit, and may include up to $100 million in capital leases.leases each fiscal year. As the available balance is reduced by commercial paper borrowings and certain outstanding letters of credit, the Company had $680.2$410.5 million in available capacity under these facilitiesthis facility at August 25, 2007. The rate of interest payable under the credit facilities is a function of Bank of America’s base rate or a Eurodollar rate (each as defined in the facility agreements), or a combination thereof.

Our $300.0 million bank term loan entered in December 2004 was amended in April 2006 to have similar terms and conditions as the $1.0 billion credit facilities, but with a December 2009 maturity, and was further amended in August 2007 to reduce the interest rate on Euro-dollar loans. That credit agreement with a group of banks provides for a term loan, which consists of, at our election, base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or a combination thereof. The interest accrues on base rate loans at a base rate per annum equal to the higher of the prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1%.29, 2009. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate plus the applicable percentage, which cancould range from 30150 basis points to 90450 basis points, depending upon our senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating. Based onThis facility expires in July 2012.
During August 2009, we elected to prepay, without penalty, our ratings$300 million bank term loan entered in December 2004, and subsequently amended. The term loan facility provided for a term loan, which consisted of, at August 25, 2007, the applicable percentage onour election, base rate loans, Eurodollar loans is 35 basis points. We may select interest periods of one, two, three or six months for Eurodollar loans, subject to availability. Interest is payable at the enda combination thereof. The entire unpaid principal amount of the selected interest period, but no less frequently than quarterly.term loan was due and payable in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility was scheduled to terminate. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement on December 29, 2004, to effectively fix, based on current debt ratings, the interest rate of the term loan at 4.4%. We haveThe outstanding liability associated with the option to extend loans into subsequent interest period(s) or convert them into loans of another interest rate type. The entire unpaid principal amountswap totaled $3.6 million, and was expensed in operating, selling, general and administrative expenses upon termination of the term loan will be due and payablehedge in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility terminates. We may prepay the term loan in whole or in part at any time without penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in the case of prepayment of Eurodollar borrowings.fiscal 2009.

During April 2006, our $150.0 million Senior Notes maturing at that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. On June 8, 2006,25, 2008, we entered into an agreement with ESL Investments, Inc. (the “ESL Agreement”), setting forth certain understandings and agreements regarding the voting by ESL Investments, Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates (collectively, “ESL”), of certain shares of common stock of AutoZone, Inc. and related matters. Among other things, we agreed to use our commercially reasonable efforts to increase our adjusted debt/EBITDAR target ratio from 2.1:1 to 2.5:1 no later than February 14, 2009. We met this commitment at February 14, 2009. We calculate adjusted debt as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rent times six; and we calculate EBITDAR by adding interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and stock option expenses to net income. At August 29, 2009, our adjusted debt/EBITDAR ratio was 2.5:1. (The ESL agreement is filed as Exhibit 10.22 to this Form 10-K).
On August 4, 2008, we issued $200.0$500 million in 6.95%6.50% Senior Notes due 20162014 and $250 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018 under our existing shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2004.July 29, 2008 (the “Shelf Registration”). That shelf registration allowed us to sell up to $300 millionan indeterminate amount in debt securities to fund general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions.
On July 2, 2009, we issued $500 million in 5.75% Senior Notes due 2015 under the Shelf Registration. We used the proceeds to pay down our commercial paper borrowings, to prepay in full our $300 million term loan in August 2009, and the remainder for general corporate purposes, including for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, new store openings and stock repurchases.
The remainder6.50% and 7.125% Senior Notes issued during August 2008, and the 5.75% Senior Notes issued in July 2009, are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the notes are downgraded. They also contain a provision that repayment of the shelf registration was cancellednotes may be accelerated if AutoZone experiences a change in February, 2007.

control (as defined in the agreements). Our borrowings under our Senior Notes arrangementsother senior notes contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens. Under our other borrowing arrangements, covenants include limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision wherethat may require acceleration of the repayment obligations may be accelerated if AutoZone experiences a change in control (as defined in the agreements).under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under our borrowing arrangements may be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or an event of default occurs.
The $800 million revolving credit agreement requires that our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last day of each quarter shall be no less than 2.50:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. Our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of August 29, 2009 was 4.19:1. As of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, we were in compliance with all covenants and expect to remain in compliance with all covenants.

23



Stock Repurchases
During 1998, the Companywe announced a program permitting the Companyus to repurchase a portion of itsour outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’sour Board of Directors. The program was most recentlylast amended in June 20072009 to increase the repurchase authorization to $5.9$7.9 billion from $5.4$7.4 billion. From January 1998 to August 25, 2007, the Company has29, 2009, we have repurchased a total of 99.3115.4 million shares at an aggregate cost of $5.4$7.6 billion. The CompanyWe repurchased 9.3 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $1.3 billion during fiscal 2009, 6.8 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $849.2 million during fiscal 2008, and 6.0 million shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $761.9 million during fiscal 2007, 6.22007.
From August 30, 2009 to October 26, 2009, we repurchased 1.2 million shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $578.1 million during fiscal 2006, and 4.8 million shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $426.9 million during fiscal 2005.for $178.2 million.
21


Financial Commitments
The following table shows AutoZone’s significant contractual obligations as of August 25, 2007: 29, 2009:
                     
  Total  Payment Due by Period 
  Contractual  Less than  Between  Between  Over 5 
(in thousands) Obligations  1 year  1-3 years  4-5 years  years 
                     
Long-term debt (1) $2,726,900  $277,600  $199,300  $1,000,000  $1,250,000 
Interest payments (2)  780,175   145,338   276,425   220,237   138,175 
Operating leases (3)  1,558,027   177,781   319,650   251,149   809,447 
Capital leases (4)  55,703   16,932   30,132   8,639    
Self-insurance reserves (5)  153,602   54,307   44,840   23,673   30,782 
Construction commitments  18,749   18,749          
                
  $5,293,156  $690,707  $870,347  $1,503,698  $2,228,404 
                
  
Total
 
Payment Due by Period  
 
  
Contractual
 
Less than
 
Between
 
Between
 
Over 5
 
(in thousands) 
 
Obligations 
 
1 year 
 
1-3 years 
 
4-5 years 
 
years 
 
            
Long-term debt (1) 
$
1,935,618
 
$
435,618
 
$
300,000
 
$
200,000
 
$
1,000,000
 
Interest payments (2)  
500,707
  
96,988
  
154,506
  
118,300
  130,913 
Operating leases (3)  1,312,252  171,163  291,970  214,984  634,135 
Capital leases (4)  62,510  16,015  28,928  17,567   
Self-insurance reserves (5)  
141,815
  
45,727
  
45,283
  22,415  28,390 
Construction obligations  
23,804
  
23,804
  
  
   
  
$
3,976,706
 
$
789,315
 
$
820,687
 
$
573,266
 
$
1,793,438
 

(1)
(1)Long-term debt balances represent principal maturities, excluding interest. At August 25, 2007, debt balances due in less than one year of $435.6 million are classified as long-term in our consolidated financial statements, as we have the ability and intent to refinance them on a long-term basis.

(2)
Represents obligations for interest payments on long-term debt, including the effect of interest rate hedges.debt.

(3)
Operating lease obligations include related interest and are inclusive of amounts accrued within deferred rent and closed store obligations reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.

(4)
Capital lease obligations include related interest.

(5)
The Company retains a significant portion of the risks associated with workers compensation, employee health, general and product liability, property, and automotivevehicle insurance. These amounts represent undiscounted estimates based on actuarial calculations. Although these obligations do not have scheduled maturities, , the timing of future payments are predictable based upon historical patterns. Accordingly, the Company reflects the net present value of these obligations in its consolidated balance sheets.
We have otherPension obligations reflected in our consolidated balance sheet that are not reflected in the table above due to the absence of scheduled maturities or due toand the nature of the account. Therefore,As disclosed in “Note K — Pension and Savings Plans”, our pension liability is $185.6 million and our pension assets are $115.3 million at August 29, 2009.
Additionally, as disclosed in “Note D — Income Taxes”, our tax liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, was $56.6 million at August 29, 2009. Approximately $25.9 million is classified as short term and $30.7 million is classified as long term. We did not reflect these obligations in the Financial Commitments table as we are unable to make an estimate of the timing of these payments cannot be determined, except for amounts estimateddue to be payable in 2008 that are included in current liabilities.

We have certain contingent liabilities that are not accrued in our balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepteduncertainties in the United States. These contingent liabilities are not included intiming of the table above.settlement of these tax positions.

24



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table reflects outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds as of August 25, 2007.29, 2009.
    
 Total 
 Other 
(in thousands)
 
Total
Other
Commitments
  Commitments 
Standby letters of credit 
$
113,305
  $111,904 
Surety bonds  
11,286
  14,818 
 
$
124,591
    
 $126,722 
   
A substantial portion of the outstanding standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis) and surety bonds are used to cover reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers. There are no additional contingent liabilities associated with them as the underlying liabilities are already reflected in our consolidated balance sheet. The standby letters of credit and surety bonds arrangements expire within one year, but have automatic renewal clauses.

In conjunction with our commercial sales program, we offer credit to some of our commercial customers. The majorityHistorically, certain of ourthe receivables related to thethis credit program arewere sold to a third party at a discount for cash with limited recourse. AutoZone has recorded a reserve for this recourse. At August 25, 2007,30, 2008, we had $55.4 million outstanding under this program. During the receivables facility had an outstanding balancesecond quarter of $55.3 million and the balance of the recourse reserve was $1.8 million.
22


We have entered into POS arrangements with certain vendors, whereby we will not purchase merchandise supplied by a vendor until just before that merchandise is ultimately soldfiscal 2009, AutoZone terminated its agreement to our customers. Title and certain risks of ownership remain with the vendor until the merchandise is sold to our customers. Since we do not own merchandise under POS arrangements until just before it is soldsell receivables to a customer, such merchandise is not recorded on our balance sheet. Upon the salethird party. There were no amounts outstanding under this program as of the merchandise to our customers, we recognize the liability for the goods and pay the vendor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. Although we do not hold title to the goods, we do control pricing and have credit collection risk and therefore, gross revenues under POS arrangements are included in net sales in the income statement. Sales of merchandise under POS arrangements approximated $170.0 million in fiscal 2007, $390.0 million in fiscal 2006, and $460.0 million in fiscal 2005. Merchandise under POS arrangements was $22.4 million at August 25, 2007 and $92.1 million at August 26, 2006.
29, 2009.

Value of Pension Assets

At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the fair market value of AutoZone’s pension assets was $161.2$115.3 million, and the related accumulated benefit obligation was $161.1$185.6 million based on a May 31, 2007an August 29, 2009 measurement date. On January 1, 2003, our defined benefit pension plans were frozen. Accordingly, plan participants earn no new benefits under the plan formulas, and no new participants may join the plans. The material assumptions for fiscal 20072009 are an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0% and a discount rate of 6.25%6.24%. For additional information regarding AutoZone’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans refer to “Note I - PensionsK — Pension and Savings Plans” in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

“Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” include certain financial measures not derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information for determining our optimum capital structure and are used to assist management in evaluating performance and in making appropriate business decisions to maximize stockholders’ value.

Non-GAAP financial measures should not be used as a substitute for GAAP financial measures, or considered in isolation, for the purpose of analyzing our operating performance, financial position or cash flows. However, we have presented the non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe they provide additional information that is useful to analyze or compare our operations.investors as it indicates more clearly the Company’s comparative year-to-year operating results. Furthermore, our management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors use the abovementionedabove-mentioned non-GAAP financial measures to analyze and compare our underlying operating results and to determine payments of performance-based compensation. We have included a reconciliation of this information to the most comparable GAAP measures in the following reconciliation tables.

25



Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Cash Flow Before ShareRepurchases and Changes in Debt
The following table reconciles net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents to cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt, which is presented in the “Selected Financial Data”.

(in thousands)
 
Fiscal Year Ended August 
                     
(in thousands)
 
2007 
 
2006 
 
2005 
 
2004 
 
2003 
 
 Fiscal Year Ended August 
 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 
            
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(4,904)$16,748 $(2,042)$(16,250)$22,796  $(149,755) $155,807 $(4,904) $16,748 $(2,042)
Less: Increase (decrease) in debt  78,461 (4,693) (7,400) 322,405 352,328  476,900 314,382 78,461  (4,693)  (7,400)
Less: Share repurchases  (761,887) (578,066) (426,852) (848,102) (891,095)  (1,300,002)  (849,196)  (761,887)  (578,066)  (426,852)
           
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt 
$
678,522
 
$
599,507
 
$
432,210
 
$
509,447
 
$
561,563
  $673,347 $690,621 $678,522 $599,507 $432,210 
           

23

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: After-Tax Return on InvestedCapital
The following table reconciles the percentages of after-tax return on invested capital, or “ROIC.” After-tax return on invested capital is calculated as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent) divided by average invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). The ROIC percentages are presented in the “Selected Financial Data.”Data”.

(in thousands, except percentage data)

                     
  Fiscal Year Ended August 
  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
Net income $657,049  $641,606  $595,672  $569,275  $571,019 
Adjustments:                    
After-tax interest  90,456   74,355   75,793   68,089   65,533 
After-tax rent  115,239   105,166   97,050   90,808   96,367 
                
After-tax return $862,744  $821,127  $768,515  $728,172  $732,919 
                
                     
Average debt (1) $2,477,233  $2,015,186  $1,955,652  $1,909,011  $1,969,639 
Average equity (2)  (82,006)  353,411   478,853   510,657   316,639 
Rent x 6 (3)  1,087,848   990,726   915,138   863,328   774,706 
Average capital lease obligations (4)  58,512   60,824   30,538       
                
Pre-tax invested capital $3,541,587  $3,420,147  $3,380,181  $3,282,996  $3,060,984 
                
 
ROIC  24.4%  24.0%  22.7%  22.2%  23.9%
                
  
Fiscal Year Ended August
 
  
2007
 
2006  
 
2005  
 
2004 
 
2003 
 
Net income 
$
595,672
 
$
569,275
 
$
571,019
 $566,202 $517,604 
Adjustments:                
After-tax interest  
75,793
  68,089  65,533  58,003  52,686 
After-tax rent  
97,050
  90,808  
96,367
  73,086  68,764 
After-tax return 
$
768,515
 $728,172 $732,919 $697,291 $639,054 
                 
Average debt (1) 
$
1,955,652
 $1,909,011 $1,969,639 $1,787,307 $1,484,987 
Average equity (2)  
478,853
  510,657  316,639  292,802  580,176 
Rent x 6 (3)  
915,138
  863,328  
774,706
  701,621  663,990 
Average capital lease obligations (4)  30,538  -  -  -  - 
Pre-tax invested capital 
$
3,380,181
 $3,282,996 $3,060,984 $2,781,730 $2,729,153 
                 
ROIC  
22.7
%
 22.2% 23.9% 25.1% 23.4%

(1)
(1)Average debt is equal to the average of our long-term debt measured at the end of the prior fiscal year and each of the 13 fiscal periods in the current fiscal year. Long-term debt (in thousands) was $1,194,517 at August 31, 2002.

(2)Average equity is equal to the average of our stockholders’ equity measured at the end of the prior fiscal year and each of the 13 fiscal periods of the current fiscal year. Stockholders’ equity (in thousands) was $689,127 at August 31, 2002.

(3)Rent is multiplied by a factor of six to capitalize operating leases in the determination of pre-tax invested capital. This calculation excludes the impact from the cumulative lease accounting adjustments recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

(4)Average of the capital lease obligations relating to vehicle capital leases entered into at the beginning of fiscal 2007 is computed as the average over the trailing 13 periods. Rent expense associated with the vehicles prior to the conversion to capital leases is included in the rent for purposes of calculating return on invested capital.

26


Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Adjusted Debt to Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Rent and Options Expense “EBITDAR”

The following table reconciles the ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDAR. Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is calculated as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times six; divided by net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, rent and stock option expenses. The adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratios are presented in the “Selected Financial Data”.
(in thousands, except for Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR)
                     
Adjusted Debt / EBITDAR August 29, 2009  August 30, 2008  August 25, 2007  August 26, 2006  August 27, 2005 
Net income $657,049  $641,606  $595,672  $569,275  $571,019 
Add: Interest  142,316   116,745   119,116   107,889   102,443 
Taxes  376,697   365,783   340,478   332,761   302,202 
                
EBIT $1,176,062  $1,124,134  $1,055,266  $1,009,925  $975,664 
                     
Add: Depreciation  180,433   169,509   159,411   139,465   135,597 
Rent expense (1)  181,308   165,121   152,523   143,888   150,645 
Option expense  19,135   18,388   18,462   17,370    
                
EBITDAR $1,556,938  $1,477,152  $1,385,662  $1,310,648  $1,261,906 
                     
Debt $2,726,900  $2,250,000  $1,935,618  $1,857,157  $1,861,850 
Capital lease obligations  54,764   64,061   55,088       
Add: Rent x 6  1,087,848   990,726   915,138   863,328   774,708 
                
Adjusted debt $3,869,512  $3,304,787  $2,905,844  $2,720,485  $2,636,558 
                
                     
Adjusted Debt / EBITDAR  2.5   2.2   2.1   2.1   2.1 
(1)Fiscal 2005 rent expense includes a $21.5 million non-cash adjustment associated with accounting for leases and leasehold improvements.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Fiscal 2008 Results Excluding Impact of 53rd Week:
The following table summarizes the favorable impact of the additional week of the 53 week fiscal year ended August 30, 2008.
(in thousands, except per share and percentage data)
                     
              Fiscal 2008    
              Results of    
  Fiscal 2008      Results of  Operations    
  Results of  Percent of  Operations for  Excluding  Percent of 
  Operations  Revenue  53rdWeek  53rdWeek  Revenue 
Net sales $6,522,706   100.0% $(125,894) $6,396,812   100.0%
Cost of sales  3,254,645   49.9%  (62,700)  3,191,945   49.9%
                
Gross profit  3,268,061   50.1%  (63,194)  3,204,867   50.1%
Operating expenses  2,143,927   32.9%  (36,087)  2,107,840   32.9%
                
Operating profit  1,124,134   17.2%  (27,107)  1,097,027   17.2%
Interest expense, net  116,745   1.8%  (2,340)  114,405   1.8%
                
Income before income taxes  1,007,389   15.4%  (24,767)  982,622   15.4%
Income taxes  365,783   5.6%  (8,967)  356,816   5.6%
                
Net income $641,606   9.8% $(15,800) $625,806   9.8%
                
Diluted earnings per share $10.04      $(0.24) $9.80     
                  

27


24

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

TheIn September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB InterpretationStatement No. 48, “Accounting158, “Employers’ Accounting for UncertaintyDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively postretirement benefit plans) to: recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) in June 2006. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized instatement of financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 will be effective for ourposition, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year beginning August 26, 2007. The Company has not determined the effect, if any, that the adoptionyear-end statement of FIN 48 will have on the Company’s financial position, and resultsprovide additional disclosures.
On August 25, 2007, we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions and on August 31, 2008, we adopted the measurement date provisions. The adoption of operations.these provisions had no material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Refer to “Note K-Pension and Savings Plans” for further description of these adoptions.

In September 2006, the FASB issuedOn August 31, 2008, we adopted, FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective for AutoZone in fiscal 2009. The CompanyThere is still ina one-year deferral of the processadoption of evaluating the impact, if any, that SFAS 157 will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans -- An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R ("SFAS 158"). This newthis standard requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan's overfunded status or a liability for a plan's underfunded status; (b) measure a plan'sas it relates to nonfinancial assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer's fiscal year (with limited exceptions); and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. Those changes will be reported in comprehensive income. We adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 during 2007 and will adopt the measurement date provisions in 2009. Please refer to Note I (Pension and Savings Plan) for further descriptionliabilities. The adoption of this adoption.

statement did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In FebruaryDecember 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 141R, “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141R”). This standard significantly changes the accounting for and reporting of business combinations in consolidated financial statements. Among other things, SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and requires the expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs. The standard is effective for us beginning August 30, 2009 and is applicable only to transactions occurring after the effective date.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133,” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends SFAS No. 133 to improve the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by providing enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 (“FSP 107-1”) and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28-1 (“APB 28-1”), “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value Option forof Financial AssetsInstruments,” amending the disclosure requirements in SFAS 107 and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This new standard permits entities to choose to measure manyAPB Opinion 28. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods in addition to annual reporting periods. These disclosures will be required commencing with our fiscal quarter beginning August 30, 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and certain other items at fair value.disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS 159165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We adopted SFAS 165 on August 29, 2009, and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued.
In June 2009, the FASB voted to approve the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification will be effective for AutoZone inus commencing with our fiscal quarter beginning August 30, 2009. The Company is still inFASB Codification does not change U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but combines all authoritative standards such as those issued by the processFASB, American Institute of evaluatingCertified Public Accountants and the impact, if any, that it will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.Emerging Issues Task Force into a comprehensive topically organized online database.

28


Critical Accounting Policies

Estimates
Preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and related disclosures of contingent liabilities. In the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we describe our significant accounting policies used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Our policies are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are drawn from historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ under different assumptions or conditions. Our senior management has identified the critical accounting policies for the areas that are materially impacted by estimates and assumptions and have discussed such policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The following items in our consolidated financial statements require significant estimation or judgment:

Inventory Reserves and cost of sales
Inventory and Cost of Sales
LIFO
We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. Included in inventory are related purchasing, storagemethod for domestic merchandise and handling costs.the first-in, first out (FIFO) method for Mexico inventories. Due to price deflation on the Company’sour merchandise purchases, the Company’sour domestic inventory balances are effectively maintained under the first-in, first-out method as the Company’s policy isFIFO method. We do not to write up inventory for favorable LIFO adjustments, resulting in cost of sales being reflected at the higher amount. Since inventory value is adjusted regularlyand due to reflect market conditions, our inventory methodology reflects the lower of cost or market. The natureprice deflation, LIFO costs of our domestic inventories exceed replacement costs by $223.0 million at August 29, 2009, calculated using the dollar value method.
Inventory Obsolescence and Shrinkage
Our inventory, primarily hard parts, maintenance items and accessories/non-automotive products, is suchused on vehicles that have rather long lives; and therefore, the risk of obsolescence is minimal and the majority of excess inventory has historically been returned to our vendors for credit. We provide reservesIn the isolated instances where less than full credit will be received for such returns and where we anticipate that items will be sold at retail prices that are less than recorded costs. costs, we record a charge (less than $15 million in each of the last three years) through cost of sales for the difference. These charges are based on management’s judgment, including estimates and assumptions regarding marketability of products and the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods.
Historically, we have not encountered material exposure to inventory obsolescence or excess inventory, nor have we experienced material changes to our estimates. However, we may be exposed to material losses should our vendors alter their policy with regard to accepting excess inventory returns.
Additionally, we reduce inventory for estimatedprojected losses related to shrinkage. Our shrink estimateshrinkage, which is estimated based on historical losses verified by ongoingand current inventory loss trends resulting from previous physical inventories. Shrinkage may occur due to theft, loss or inaccurate records for the receipt of goods, among other things. Throughout the year, we take physical inventory counts.counts of our stores and distribution centers to verify these estimates. We make assumptions regarding upcoming physical inventory counts that may differ from actual results. Over the last three years, there has been less than a 25 basis point fluctuation in our shrinkage rate.
Each quarter, we evaluate the accrued shrinkage in light of the actual shrink results. To the extent our actual physical inventory count results differ from our estimates, we may experience material adjustments to our financial statements. Historically, we have not experienced material adjustments to our shrinkage estimates and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use.
A 10% difference in our inventory reserves as of August 29, 2009, would have affected net income by approximately $3 million in fiscal 2009.

29


25


Vendor Allowances
allowances
AutoZone receives various payments and allowances from its vendors based onthrough a variety of programs and arrangements, including allowances for warranties, advertising and general promotion of vendor products. Vendor allowances are treated as a reduction of inventory, unless they are provided as a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by the volume of purchases or for services that AutoZone provides toCompany in selling the vendors. Monies received from vendors include rebates, allowances and promotional funds. The amounts to be received are subject to purchase volumes and the termsvendor’s products. Approximately 90% of the vendor agreements, which generally do not state an expiration date, but are subject to ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in the future based on changes in market conditions, vendor marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or sell-through of the related merchandise. The Company’s level of advertising and other operating, selling, general and administrative expenditures are not dependent on vendor allowances.

Rebates and other miscellaneous incentives are earned based on purchases or product sales and are accrued ratably over the purchase or sale of the related product, but only if it is reasonably certain that the required volume levels will be reached. These moniesfunds received are recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the relatedthese inventories are sold.

For all allowances and promotional funds earned underBased on our vendor agreements, a significant portion of vendor funding we receive is based on our inventory purchases. Therefore, we record receivables for funding not yet received as we purchase inventory. During the Company appliesyear, we regularly review the guidance pursuantreceivables from vendors to the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting byensure vendors are able to meet their obligations. We have not recorded a Customer (Including a Reseller)reserve against these receivables as we have legal right of offset with our vendors for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”), by recording the vendor funds as a reduction of inventories that are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the inventories are sold. The Company’s vendor funding arrangements do not provide forpayments owed them. Historically, we have had minimal write-offs (less than $100 thousand in any reimbursement arrangements that are for specific, incremental, identifiable costs that are permitted under EITF 02-16 for the funding to be recorded as a reduction to advertising or other operating, selling, general and administrative expenses.

Impairments
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), we evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, such as propertylast three years) and equipment, covered by this standard annually and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances dictate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As part of the evaluation, we review performance at the store levelthese write-offs were due to identify any stores with current period operating losses that should be considered for impairment. We compare the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows with the carrying amounts of the assets.severed relationships.

Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), we perform an annual test of goodwill to compare the estimated fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount to determine if any impairment exists. We perform the annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments.

If impairments are indicated by either of the above evaluations, the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized as an impairment loss. Such evaluations require management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the evaluation is performed, which could differ from actual results.

Self-Insurance
We retain a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’ compensation, vehicle, employee health, general and productproducts liability and property losses. Liabilities associated with these losses include estimates of both claims filedlosses; and losses incurred but not yet reported. Through various methods, which include analyses of historical trends and utilization of actuaries, the Company estimates the costs of these risks. The actuarial estimated long-term portions of these liabilities are recorded at our estimate of their net present value; other liabilities are not discounted. We believe the amounts accrued are adequate, although actual losses may differ from the amounts provided. We maintain stop-loss coveragewe obtain third party insurance to limit the exposure related to certain of these risks. Our self-insurance reserve estimates totaled $158 million, $145 million, and $133 million as of the end of fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. These increases are primarily reflective of our growing operations, including inflation and increases in vehicles and the number of hours worked.

Income Taxes
The assumptions made by management in estimating our self-insurance reserves include consideration of historical cost experience, judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim and retention levels. We accrueutilize various methods, including analyses of historical trends and pay income taxesactuarial methods, to estimate the cost to settle reported claims, and claims incurred, but not yet reported. The actuarial methods develop estimates of the future ultimate claim costs based on the claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. When estimating these liabilities, we consider factors, such as the severity, duration and frequency of claims, legal costs associated with claims, healthcare trends, and projected inflation of related factors. In recent history, we have experienced improvements in frequency and duration of claims; however, medical and wage inflation have partially offset these trends. Throughout this time, our methods for determining our exposure have remained consistent, and these trends have been appropriately factored into our reserve estimates.
Management believes that the various assumptions developed and actuarial methods used to determine our self- insurance reserves are reasonable and provide meaningful data and information that management uses to make its best estimate of our exposure to these risks. Arriving at these estimates, however, requires a significant amount of subjective judgment by management, and as a result these estimates are uncertain and our actual exposure may be different from our estimates. For example, changes in our assumptions about health care costs, the severity of accidents and the incidence of illness, the average size of claims and other factors could cause actual claim costs to vary materially from our assumptions and estimates, causing our reserves to be overstated or understated. For instance, a 10% change in our self-insurance liability would have affected net income by approximately $10 million for fiscal 2009.
As we obtain additional information and refine our methods regarding the assumptions and estimates we use to recognize liabilities incurred, we will adjust our reserves accordingly. In recent years, we have experienced favorable claims development, particularly related to workers compensation, and have adjusted our estimates accordingly. We attribute this success to programs, such as return to work and projects aimed at accelerating claims closure. The programs have matured and proven to be successful and are therefore considered in our current and future assumptions regarding claims costs.
Our liabilities for workers compensation, certain general and product liability, property and vehicle claims do not have scheduled maturities; however, the timing of future payments is predictable based on historical patterns and is relied upon in determining the current portion of these liabilities. Accordingly, we reflect the net present value of these obligations in our balance sheet using the risk-free interest rate as of the balance sheet date. If the discount rate used to calculate present value of these reserves changed by 50 basis points, net income would have changed approximately $2 million at August 29, 2009. Our liability for health benefits is classified as current, as the historical average duration of claims is approximately six weeks.

30


Income Taxes
Our income tax statutes, regulationsreturns are audited by state, federal and case lawforeign tax authorities, and we are typically engaged in various tax examinations at any given time. Tax contingencies often arise due to uncertainty or differing interpretations of the application of tax rules throughout the various jurisdictions in which we operate. IncomeThe contingencies are influenced by items such as tax expense involvesaudits, changes in tax laws, litigation, appeals and experience with previous similar tax positions. We regularly review our tax reserves for these items and assess the adequacy of the amount we have recorded. As of August 29, 2009, we had approximately $56.6 million reserved for uncertain tax positions.
We evaluate potential exposures associated with our various tax filings in accordance with FIN 48 by estimating a liability for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.
We believe our estimates to be reasonable and have not experienced material adjustments to our reserves in the previous three years; however, actual results could differ from our estimates and we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. Specifically, management has used judgment asand made assumptions to estimate the likely outcome of certain tax positions. Additionally, to the ultimate resolutionextent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or must pay in excess of recognized reserves, our effective tax rate in any tax matters in dispute with state, federal and foreign tax authorities. Management believes the resolution of the current open tax issues will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. particular period could be materially affected.
26


Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities
We have received claims related to and been notified that we are a defendant in a number of legal proceedings resulting from our business, such as employment matters, product liability claims and general liability claims related to our store premises. We calculate contingent loss accruals using our best estimate of our probable and reasonably estimable contingent liabilities.

Pension Obligation
Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time employees were covered by a defined benefit pension plan. The benefits under the plan were based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation. On January 1, 2003, the plan was frozen. Accordingly, pension plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan. On January 1, 2003, the Company’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated employees was also frozen. Accordingly, plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan. As the plan benefits are frozen, the annual pension expense and recorded liabilities are not impacted by increases in future compensation levels, but are impacted by actuarial calculations usingthe use of two key assumptions:assumptions in the calculation of these balances:

i.Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets: estimated by consideringAs described more fully in “Note K — Pension and Savings Plans”, we have assumed an 8% long-term rate of return on our plan assets. This estimate is a judgmental matter in which management considers the composition of our asset portfolio, our historical long-term investment performance and current market conditions. We review the expected long-term rate of return on an annual basis, and revise it accordingly. Additionally, we monitor the mix of investments in our portfolio to ensure alignment with our long-term strategy to manage pension cost and reduce volatility in our assets. At August 29, 2009, our plan assets totaled $115 million in our qualified plan. We have no assets in our nonqualified plan. A 50 basis point change in our expected long term rate of return would impact annual pension expense/income by approximately $570 thousand for the qualified plan.
ii.Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations:This rate is highly sensitive and is adjusted annually based on the interest rate for long-term high-quality corporate bonds as of the measurement date (May 31) using yields for maturities that are in line with the duration of our pension liabilities. This same discount rate is also used to determine pension expense for the following plan year. If such assumptions differ materially from actual experience,For fiscal 2009, we assumed a discount rate of 6.24%. A decrease in the discount rate increases pension expense. A 50 basis point change in the discount rate at August 29, 2009 would impact could be material to our financial statements.annual pension expense/income by approximately $1.9 million for the qualified plan and $30 thousand for the nonqualified plan.

31


Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk

AutoZone is exposed to market risk from, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel prices. From time to time, we use various financial instruments to reduce interest rate and fuel price risks. To date, based upon our current level of foreign operations, hedging costs and past changes in the associated foreign exchange rates, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce foreign exchange rate risk. All of our hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by our Board of Directors. Further, we do not buy or sell financial instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk
AutoZone’s financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, we reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate swap contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps.

AutoZone has historically utilized interest rate swaps to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt and to lock in fixed rates on future debt issuances. We reflect the current fair value of all interest rate hedge instruments in our consolidated balance sheets as a component of other assets.assets or liabilities. All of the Company’s interest rate hedge instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. We had an outstanding interest rate swap with a negative fair value of $5.8$4.3 million at August 25, 2007, and $10.2 million at August 26, 2006,30, 2008, to effectively fix the interest rate on the $300.0$300 million term loan entered into during December 2004. During the current fiscal year, we prepaid the term loan and terminated the interest rate swap; as a result, at August 29, 2009, we had no outstanding interest rate swaps.

The relatedUnrealized gains and losses on interest rate hedges are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income as a decrease or increase to interest expense in the period in which the related cash flows being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of an interest rate hedge instrument does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the cash flow being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. The Company’s hedge instrument was determined to be highly effective as of August 25, 2007.
27


For further discussion, see “Note G-Derivative Financial Instruments”.
The fair value of our debt was estimated at $1.928$2.853 billion as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $1.825$2.235 billion as of August 26, 2006,30, 2008, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues or on the current rates available to AutoZone for debt having the same remaining maturities. Such fair value is lessgreater than the carrying value of debt by $7.6$126.5 million at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and less than the carrying value of debt by $32.3$15.0 million at August 26, 2006. Considering the effect of any interest rate swaps designated and effective as cash flow hedges, we30, 2008. We had $245.6$277.6 million of variable rate debt outstanding at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $167.2 millionconsidering the effect of the interest rate swap designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, no variable rate debt outstanding at August 26, 2006. At these30, 2008. In fiscal 2009, at this borrowing levelslevel for variable rate debt, a one percentage point increase in interest rates would have had an unfavorable impact on our pre-tax earnings and cash flows of $2.5$2.8 million, in 2007 and $1.7 million in 2006, which includes the effects of the interest rate swaps.swap. The primary interest rate exposure on variable rate debt is based on LIBOR. Considering the effect of any interest rate swaps designated and effective as cash flow hedges, weWe had outstanding fixed rate debt of $1.690$2.449 billion at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and considering the effect of the interest rate swap designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, $2.250 billion at August 26, 2006.30, 2008. A one percentage point increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of our fixed rate debt by $60.8$105.9 million at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $68.3$90.7 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

Fuel Price Risk
Fuel swap contracts that we utilize have not previously been designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of SFAS 133 and thus do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, although the instruments were executed to economically hedge a portion of our diesel fuel and unleaded fuel exposure. As of August 25, 2007, the then current month’s fuel swap contract was outstanding with a settlement date of August 31, 2007. DuringIn fiscal 2007 and 2005,year 2009, we entered into fuel swaps to economically hedge a portion of our dieselunleaded fuel exposure. These swaps were settled within a few days of each fiscal year end and had no significant impact on cost of sales for the 2007 or 2005 fiscal years. We did not enter into any fuel swap contracts during the 2008 fiscal 2006.year and during fiscal year 2007, we entered into fuel swaps to economically hedge a portion of our unleaded and diesel fuel exposures. As of August 29, 2009, we had an outstanding liability of less than one hundred thousand dollars associated with our unleaded fuel swap and no outstanding fuel swap contracts at August 25, 2007. The swaps during fiscal years 2009 and 2007 had no significant impact on our results of operations in either year.

32


Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions include firm commitments and anticipated transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. The Company and its subsidiaries generally enter into transactions denominated in their respective functional currencies. Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are not material.
The Company’s primary foreign currency exposure arises from Mexican peso-denominated revenues and profits and their translation into U.S. dollars. The Company generally views as long-term its investments in the Mexican subsidiaries, which have the Mexican peso as the functional currency. As a result, the Company generally does not hedge these net investments. The net investment in Mexican subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars using the year-end exchange rates was $215.4 million at August 29, 2009 and $160.8 million at August, 30, 2008. The potential loss in value of the Company’s net investment in Mexican subsidiaries resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates at August 29, 2009 and August, 30, 2008 amounted to $19.6 million and $14.6 million, respectively. This change would be reflected in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the equity section of the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, unless the Mexican subsidiaries are sold or otherwise disposed.
During 2009, exchange rates with respect to the Mexican peso decreased by approximately 30% with respect to the U.S. dollar. The resulting foreign currency translation losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

33


28

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index


34


29

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our internal control over financial reporting includes, among other things, defined policies and procedures for conducting and governing our business, sophisticated information systems for processing transactions and properly trained staff. Mechanisms are in place to monitor the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including regular testing performed by the Company’s internal audit team, which is comprised of both Deloitte & Touche LLP professionals and Company personnel. Actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified. Our procedures for financial reporting include the active involvement of senior management, our Audit Committee and a staff of highly qualified financial and legal professionals.

Management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).

Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 25, 2007.

29, 2009.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young has issued theirits report concurring with management’s assessment, which is included in this Annual Report.
Certifications
Certifications

Compliance with NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards
On January 12, 2007,5, 2009, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the Annual CEO Certification required pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.

Rule 13a-14(a)13a-14(a) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
The Company has filed, as exhibits to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the certifications of its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004.

35


30


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.

We have audited AutoZone, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). AutoZone, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, AutoZone, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, based onthe COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 25, 200729, 2009 and August 26, 200630, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 25, 200729, 2009 of AutoZone, Inc. and our report dated October 19, 200726, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
October 26, 2009

36


October 19, 2007

31

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 25, 200729, 2009 and August 26, 200630, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 25, 2007.29, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 25, 200729, 2009 and August 26, 2006,30, 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note D to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” effective August 26, 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of AutoZone, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated October 19, 200726, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
October 26, 2009

37


October 19, 2007

32

Consolidated Statements of Income

             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
  2009  2008  2007 
(in thousands, except per share data) (52 Weeks)  (53 Weeks)  (52 Weeks) 
             
Net sales $6,816,824  $6,522,706  $6,169,804 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses  3,400,375   3,254,645   3,105,554 
          
Gross profit  3,416,449   3,268,061   3,064,250 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses  2,240,387   2,143,927   2,008,984 
          
Operating profit  1,176,062   1,124,134   1,055,266 
Interest expense, net  142,316   116,745   119,116 
          
Income before income taxes  1,033,746   1,007,389   936,150 
Income taxes  376,697   365,783   340,478 
          
Net income $657,049  $641,606  $595,672 
          
             
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share  55,282   63,295   69,101 
Effect of dilutive stock equivalents  710   580   743 
          
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  55,992   63,875   69,844 
          
             
Basic earnings per share $11.89  $10.14  $8.62 
          
Diluted earnings per share $11.73  $10.04  $8.53 
          

38


  
Year Ended 
 
(in thousands, except per share data) 
 
August 25,
2007
(52 Weeks) 
 
August 26,
2006
(52 Weeks) 
 
August 27,
2005
(52 Weeks) 
 
        
Net sales 
$
6,169,804
 
$
5,948,355
 
$
5,710,882
 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses  3,105,554  3,009,835  2,918,334 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses  2,008,984  1,928,595  1,816,884 
Operating profit  1,055,266  1,009,925  975,664 
Interest expense, net  
119,116
  
107,889
  
102,443
 
Income before income taxes  936,150  902,036  873,221 
Income taxes  
340,478
  
332,761
  
302,202
 
Net income 
$
595,672
 
$
569,275
 
$
571,019
 
           
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share  69,101  75,237  78,530 
Effect of dilutive stock equivalents  
743
  
622
  
978
 
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  
69,844
  
75,859
  
79,508
 
           
Basic earnings per share 
$
8.62
 
$
7.57
 
$
7.27
 
Diluted earnings per share 
$
8.53
 
$
7.50
 
$
7.18
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets

         
  August 29,  August 30, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2009  2008 
 
Assets
        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $92,706  $242,461 
Accounts receivable  126,514   71,241 
Merchandise inventories  2,207,497   2,150,109 
Other current assets  135,013   122,490 
       
Total current assets  2,561,730   2,586,301 
Property and equipment:        
Land  656,516   643,699 
Buildings and improvements  1,900,610   1,814,668 
Equipment  887,521   850,679 
Leasehold improvements  219,606   202,098 
Construction in progress  145,161   128,133 
       
   3,809,414   3,639,277 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  1,455,057   1,349,621 
       
   2,354,357   2,289,656 
         
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization  302,645   302,645 
Deferred income taxes  59,067   38,283 
Other long-term assets  40,606   40,227 
       
   402,318   381,155 
       
  $5,318,405  $5,257,112 
       
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $2,118,746  $2,043,271 
Accrued expenses and other  381,271   327,664 
Income taxes payable  35,145   11,582 
Deferred income taxes  171,590   136,803 
       
Total current liabilities  2,706,752   2,519,320 
Long-term debt  2,726,900   2,250,000 
Other liabilities  317,827   258,105 
         
Commitments and Contingencies      
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):        
Preferred stock, authorized 1,000 shares; no shares issued      
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 200,000 shares; 57,881 shares issued and 50,801 shares outstanding in 2009 and 63,600 shares issued and 59,608 shares outstanding in 2008  579   636 
Additional paid-in capital  549,326   537,005 
Retained earnings  136,935   206,099 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (92,035)  (4,135)
Treasury stock, at cost  (1,027,879)  (509,918)
       
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  (433,074)  229,687 
       
  $5,318,405  $5,257,112 
       
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

39


33Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
  2009  2008  2007 
(in thousands) (52 Weeks)  (53 Weeks)  (52 Weeks) 
             
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $657,049  $641,606  $595,672 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  180,433   169,509   159,411 
Amortization of debt origination fees  3,644   1,837   1,719 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  (8,407)  (10,142)  (16,523)
Deferred income taxes  46,318   67,474   24,844 
Share-based compensation expense  19,135   18,388   18,462 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable  (56,823)  (11,145)  20,487 
Merchandise inventories  (76,337)  (137,841)  (160,780)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  137,158   175,733   186,228 
Income taxes payable  32,264   (3,861)  17,587 
Other, net  (10,626)  9,542   (1,913)
          
Net cash provided by operating activities  923,808   921,100   845,194 
             
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Capital expenditures  (272,247)  (243,594)  (224,474)
Purchase of marketable securities  (48,444)  (54,282)  (94,615)
Proceeds from sale of investments  46,306   50,712   86,921 
Disposal of capital assets  10,663   4,014   3,453 
          
Net cash used in investing activities  (263,722)  (243,150)  (228,715)
             
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Net (repayments of) proceeds from commercial paper  277,600   (206,700)  84,300 
Proceeds from issuance of debt  500,000   750,000    
Repayment of debt  (300,700)  (229,827)  (5,839)
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  39,855   27,065   58,952 
Purchase of treasury stock  (1,300,002)  (849,196)  (761,887)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  8,407   10,142   16,523 
Payments of capital lease obligations  (17,040)  (15,880)  (11,360)
Other  (15,016)  (8,286)  (2,072)
          
Net cash used in financing activities  (806,896)  (522,682)  (621,383)
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (2,945)  539    
          
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (149,755)  155,807   (4,904)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  242,461   86,654   91,558 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $92,706  $242,461  $86,654 
          
             
Supplemental cash flow information:            
Interest paid, net of interest cost capitalized $132,905  $107,477  $116,580 
          
Income taxes paid $299,021  $313,875  $299,566 
          
Assets acquired through capital lease $16,880  $61,572  $69,325 
          

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data) 
 
August 25,
2007 
 
August 26,
2006 
 
      
Assets
     
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents $86,654 $91,558 
Accounts receivable  59,876  80,363 
Merchandise inventories  2,007,430  1,846,650 
Other current assets  116,495  100,356 
Total current assets  2,270,455  2,118,927 
Property and equipment:       
Land  
625,992
  
588,444
 
Buildings and improvements  1,720,172  1,566,002 
Equipment  780,199  729,426 
Leasehold improvements  183,601  165,577 
Construction in progress  85,581  134,359 
   3,395,545  3,183,808 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  1,217,703  1,132,500 
   2,177,842  2,051,308 
        
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization  302,645  302,645 
Deferred income taxes  21,331  20,643 
Other long-term assets  32,436  32,783 
   356,412  356,071 
  $4,804,709 $4,526,306 
        
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
       
Current liabilities:       
Accounts payable 
$
1,870,668
 
$
1,699,667
 
Accrued expenses and other  307,633  280,419 
Income taxes payable  25,442  24,378 
Deferred income taxes  82,152  50,104 
Total current liabilities  2,285,895  2,054,568 
Long-term debt  1,935,618  1,857,157 
Other liabilities  179,996  145,053 
        
Commitments and contingencies     
        
Stockholders’ equity:       
Preferred stock, authorized 1,000 shares; no shares issued  
  
 
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 200,000 shares; 71,250 shares issued and 65,960 shares outstanding in 2007 and 77,240 shares issued and 71,082 shares outstanding in 2006  
713
  
772
 
Additional paid-in capital  545,404  500,880 
Retained earnings  546,049  559,208 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (9,550) (15,500)
Treasury stock, at cost  (679,416) (575,832)
Total stockholders’ equity  403,200  469,528 
  $4,804,709 $4,526,306 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

40


34


Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsStockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

                             
                  Accumulated       
  Common      Additional      Other       
  Shares  Common  Paid-in  Retained  Comprehensive  Treasury    
(in thousands) Issued  Stock  Capital  Earnings  Loss  Stock  Total 
Balance at August 26, 2006  77,240  $772  $500,880  $559,208  $(15,500) $(575,832) $469,528 
Net income              595,672           595,672 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of $9,176                  14,218       14,218 
Foreign currency translation adjustment                  (3,240)      (3,240)
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of $56                  104       104 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of ($1,627)                  (2,813)      (2,813)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings                  (612)      (612)
                            
Comprehensive income                          603,329 
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 158, net of taxes of ($1,089)                  (1,707)      (1,707)
Purchase of 6,032 shares of treasury stock                      (761,887)  (761,887)
Retirement of treasury stock  (6,900)  (68)  (49,404)  (608,831)      658,303    
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  910   9   58,943               58,952 
Share-based compensation expense          18,462               18,462 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options          16,523               16,523 
                           
Balance at August 25, 2007  71,250   713   545,404   546,049   (9,550)  (679,416)  403,200 
                      
Net income              641,606           641,606 
Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of ($1,145)                  (1,817)      (1,817)
Foreign currency translation Adjustment                  13,965       13,965 
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of $142                  263       263 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of ($3,715)                  (6,398)      (6,398)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings                  (598)      (598)
                            
Comprehensive income                          647,021 
Cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48              (26,933)          (26,933)
Purchase of 6,802 shares of treasury stock                      (849,196)  (849,196)
Retirement of treasury stock  (8,100)  (81)  (63,990)  (954,623)      1,018,694    
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  450   4   27,061               27,065 
Share-based compensation expense          18,388               18,388 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options          10,142               10,142 
                           
Balance at August 30, 2008  63,600   636   537,005   206,099   (4,135)  (509,918)  229,687 
                      
Net income              657,049           657,049 
Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of ($29,481)                  (46,956)      (46,956)
Foreign currency translation adjustment                  (43,655)      (43,655)
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities net of taxes of $306                  568       568 
Reclassification of net loss on termination of swap into earnings, net of taxes of $1,601                  2,744       2,744 
Reclassification of net gain on derivatives into earnings                  (612)      (612)
                            
Comprehensive income                          569,138 
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 158 measurement date, net of taxes of $198              300   11       311 
Purchase of 9,313 shares of treasury stock                      (1,300,002)  (1,300,002)
Issuance of 3 shares of common stock                      395   395 
Retirement of treasury shares  (6,223)  (62)  (55,071)  (726,513)      781,646    
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  504   5   39,850               39,855 
Share-based compensation expense          19,135               19,135 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options          8,407               8,407 
                      
Balance at August 29, 2009  57,881  $579  $549,326  $136,935  $(92,035) $(1,027,879) $(433,074)
                      
  
Year Ended 
 
(in thousands) 
 
August 25,
2007
(52 Weeks) 
 
August 26,
2006
(52 Weeks) 
 
August 27,
2005
(52 Weeks) 
 
        
Cash flows from operating activities:       
Net income $595,672 $569,275 $571,019 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided          
by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  159,411  139,465  135,597 
Deferred rent liability adjustment      21,527 
Amortization of debt origination fees  1,719  1,559  2,343 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  (16,523) (10,608) 31,828 
Deferred income taxes  24,844  36,306  (16,628)
Income from warranty negotiations      (1,736)
Share-based compensation expense  18,462  17,370   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
Accounts receivable  20,487  37,900  (42,485)
Merchandise inventories  (160,780) (182,790) (124,566)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  186,228  184,986  109,341 
Income taxes payable  17,587  28,676  (67,343)
Other, net  (1,913) 608  29,186 
Net cash provided by operating activities  845,194  822,747  648,083 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Capital expenditures  (224,474) (263,580) (283,478)
Purchase of marketable securities  (94,615) (159,957)  
Proceeds from sale of investments  86,921  145,369   
Acquisitions      (3,090)
Disposal of capital assets  3,453  9,845  3,797 
Net cash used in investing activities  (228,715) (268,323) (282,771)
           
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Net (repayments of) proceeds from commercial paper  84,300  (51,993) (304,700)
Proceeds from issuance of debt    200,000  300,000 
Repayment of Senior Notes    (150,000)  
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  58,952  38,253  64,547 
Purchase of treasury stock  (761,887) (578,066) (426,852)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  16,523  10,608   
Payments of capital lease obligations  (11,360)    
Other  (7,911) (6,478) (349)
Net cash used in financing activities  (621,383) (537,676) (367,354)
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (4,904) 16,748  (2,042)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  91,558  74,810  76,852 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $86,654 $91,558 $74,810 
           
Supplemental cash flow information:          
Interest paid, net of interest cost capitalized $116,580 $104,929 $98,937 
Income taxes paid $299,566 $267,913 $339,245 
Assets acquired through capital lease $69,325 $
 $
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

41


35


Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands)
 
Common
Shares
Issued  
 
Common
Stock  
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital 
 
Retained
Earnings 
 
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss 
 
 
 
Treasury
Stock 
 
 
Total  
 
                
Balance at August 28, 2004  89,393 $894 $414,231 $580,147 $(15,653)$(808,226)$171,393 
Net income           571,019        571,019 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of ($16,925)              
(25,293
)
    
(25,293
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment              
5,160
     
5,160
 
Net gains on outstanding  derivatives, net of taxes of $1,589              
2,717
     
2,717
 
Reclassification of derivative ineffectiveness into earnings, net of taxes of ($1,740)              
(2,900
)
    
(2,900
)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings              
(612
)
    
(612
)
Comprehensive income                    550,091 
Purchase of 4,822 shares of treasury stock                 
(426,852
)
 
(426,852
)
Retirement of treasury stock  (10,000) (100) (48,300) (780,890)    829,290   
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  
1,718
  
17
  
64,530
           
64,547
 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options                     
31,828
                 
     
  
31,828
 
Balance at August 27, 2005  81,111  811  462,289  370,276  (36,581) (405,788) 391,007 
Net income           569,275        569,275 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of $14,624              
22,532
     
22,532
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment              
(4,410
)
    
(4,410
)
Unrealized loss adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of ($98)              
(181
)
    
(181
)
Net gains on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of $2,152              
3,752
     
3,752
 
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings              
(612
)
    
(612
)
Comprehensive income                    590,356 
Purchase of 6,187 shares of treasury stock                 
(578,066
)
 
(578,066
)
Retirement of treasury stock  (4,600) (46) (27,633) (380,343)    408,022   
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  
729
  
7
  
38,246
           
38,253
 
Share-based compensation expense        17,370           17,370 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  
    
         
10,608
               
   
  
10,608
 
Balance at August 26, 2006  77,240  772  500,880  559,208  (15,500) (575,832) 
469,528
 
Net income           595,672        595,672 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of $9,176              14,218     14,218 
Foreign currency translation                      
adjustment              (3,240)    (3,240)
Unrealized gain adjustment on                      
marketable securities, net of taxes                      
$56              104     104 
Net losses on outstanding                      
derivatives net of taxes of ($1,627)              (2,813)    (2,813)
Reclassification of net gains on                      
derivatives into earnings              (612)    (612)
Comprehensive income                    603,329 
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS                      
158, net of taxes of ($1,089)              (1,707)    (1,707)
Purchase of 6,032 shares of                      
treasury stock                 (761,887) (761,887)
Retirement of treasury stock  (6,900) (68) (49,404) (608,831)    658,303   
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans  
910
  
9
  
58,943
           
58,952
 
Share-based compensation expense        18,462           18,462 
Income tax benefit from exercise of                      
stock options         
    
  16,523  
       
  
       
  
  
  16,523 
Balance at August 25, 2007  71,250 $713 $545,404 $546,049 $(9,550)$(679,416)$403,200 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

36


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note A - Significant Accounting Policies

Business:AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“AutoZone” or the “Company”) is principally a retailer and distributor of automotive parts and accessories. At the end of fiscal 2007,2009, the Company operated 3,9334,229 domestic stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 123188 stores in Mexico. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. ManyIn 2,303 of the stores haveat the end of fiscal 2009, the Company has a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations, and service stations.public sector accounts. The Company also sells the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web at www.autozone.com,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, the Company sells diagnosticautomotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories, and repair information, autonon-automotive products through www.autozone.com, and light truck parts, and accessories.as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com.

Fiscal Year:The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday in August. Accordingly, fiscal 2009 represented 52 weeks ended on August 29, 2009. Fiscal 2008 represented 53 weeks ended on August 30, 2008, and fiscal 2007 represented 52 weeks ended on August 25, 2007.

Basis of Presentation:The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates:Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities to prepare these financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents:Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. Excluded from cashCash equivalents are investments in money market accounts, held by the Company’s wholly owned insurance captive that was established during fiscal 2004. These investments approximated $5.2 million at August 25, 2007, and $8.0 million at August 26, 2006. They are included within the other current assets caption and are recorded at cost, which approximates market value, due to the short maturity of the investments. Also included in cash equivalents areinclude proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions with settlement terms of less than 5 days. Credit and debit card receivables included within cash equivalents were $24.3 million at August 29, 2009 and $22.7 million at August 25, 2007 and $21.6 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

Marketable Securities:During fiscal 2006, theThe Company began investinginvests a portion of its assets held by the Company’s wholly owned insurance captive in marketable debt securities. The Company accounts for these securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”) and accordingly, classifies them as available-for-sale. The Company includes thethese securities within the other current assets caption and records the amounts at fair market value, which is determined using quoted market prices at the end of the reporting period. Unrealized gains and losses on these marketable securities are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company’s basis for determining the cost of a security sold is the “Specific Identification Method.”

The Company’s available-for-sale financial instruments consisted of the following at:
following:

(in thousands) 
Amortized Cost
Basis
 Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses 
Fair
Market Value
 
 $57,245 $33 $(152)$57,126 
August 26, 2006 $46,801 $13 $(292)$46,522 
                 
  Amortized  Gross  Gross  Fair 
  Cost  Unrealized  Unrealized  Market 
(in thousands) Basis  Gains  Losses  Value 
                 
August 29, 2009 $68,862  $1,510  $(334) $70,038 
             
August 30, 2008 $58,517  $457  $(171) $58,803 
             
The debt securities held at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, had contractualeffective maturities ranging from less than one year to approximately 2 years.3 years and consisted primarily of high grade Corporate and Government fixed income securities. The Company did not realize any material gains or losses on its marketable securities during fiscal 2007. Prior2009.
The Company holds three securities that are in an unrealized loss position of approximately $300 thousand at August 29, 2009. The Company has the intent and ability to 2006,hold these investments until recovery of fair value or maturity, and does not deem the investments to be impaired on an other than temporary basis. In evaluating whether the securities are deemed to be impaired on an other than temporary basis, the Company did not invest in any securities requiredconsiders factors such as the duration and severity of the loss position, the credit worthiness of the investee, the term to be accounted for under SFAS 115.maturity and our intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity or until recovery of fair value.

42


37


Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable consists of receivables from commercial customers and vendors, and are presented net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. AutoZone routinely grants credit to certain of its commercial customers. The risk of credit loss in its trade receivables is substantially mitigated by the Company’s credit evaluation process, short collection terms and sales to a large number of customers, as well as the low revenue per transaction for most of its sales. Allowances for potential credit losses are determined based on historical experience and current evaluation of the composition of accounts receivable. Historically, credit losses have been within management’s expectations and the allowances for uncollectible accounts were $17.7$2.5 million at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $13.7$16.3 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008. The Company routinely sellsdecrease in the majorityallowance during fiscal 2009 was due to the write off against the allowance of its$14.9 million of receivables that were over 2 years old and previously reserved.
Historically, certain receivables were sold to a third party at a discount for cash with limited recourse. At August 30, 2008, the Company had $55.4 million outstanding under this program. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, AutoZone has recordedterminated its agreement to sell receivables to a $1.8 million recourse reserve related to the $55.3 million inthird party. There were no amounts outstanding factored receivables atunder this program as of August 25, 2007. The recourse reserve at August 26, 2006 approximated $1.0 million related to the $53.4 million in outstanding factored receivables.29, 2009.

Merchandise Inventories:Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.method for domestic inventories and the first-in, first out (FIFO) for Mexico inventories. Included in inventory are related purchasing, storage and handling costs. Due to price deflation on the Company’s merchandise purchases, the Company’s domestic inventory balances are effectively maintained under the first-in, first-out method as theFIFO method. The Company’s policy is not to write up inventory for favorable LIFO adjustments, resulting in costexcess of sales being reflected at the higher amount.replacement cost. The cumulative balance of this unrecorded adjustment, which will be reduced upon experiencing price inflation on our merchandise purchases, was $227.9$223.0 million at August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $198.3$225.4 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

AutoZone has entered into pay-on-scan (“POS”) arrangements with certain vendors, whereby AutoZone will not purchase merchandise supplied by a vendor until that merchandise is ultimately sold to AutoZone’s customers. Title and certain risks of ownership remain with the vendor until the merchandise is sold to AutoZone’s customers. Since the Company does not own merchandise under POS arrangements until just before it is sold to a customer, such merchandise is not recorded in the Company’s balance sheet. Upon the sale of the merchandise to AutoZone’s customers, AutoZone recognizes the liability for the goods and pays the vendor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. Although AutoZone does not hold title to the goods, AutoZone controls pricing and has credit collection risk and therefore, gross revenues under POS arrangements are included in net sales in the income statement. Sales of merchandise under POS arrangements approximated $170.0 million in fiscal 2007, $390.0 million in fiscal 2006, and $460.0 million in fiscal 2005. Merchandise under POS arrangements was $22.4 million at August 25, 2007 and $92.1 million at August 26, 2006.

Property and Equipment:Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed principally using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildings, 40 to 50 years; building improvements, 5 to 15 years; equipment, 3 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the asset’s estimated useful life or the remaining lease term, which includes any reasonably assured renewal periods. Depreciation and amortization include amortization of assets under capital lease.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), theThe Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts of theits long-lived assets covered by this standard annually and more frequently ifwhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. As part ofrecoverable and exceeds its fair value. When such an event occurs, the evaluation, the Company reviews performance at the store level to identify any stores with current period operating losses that should be considered for impairment. The Company compares the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the asset (asset group) with the carrying amounts of the assets.asset. If impairmentsthe undiscounted expected future cash flows are indicated,less than the carrying value of the assets, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized as an impairment loss where fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flows.assets. No significant impairment losses were recorded in the three years ended August 25, 2007.29, 2009.

Goodwill:The cost in excess of fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired is recorded as goodwill. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), goodwillGoodwill has not been amortized since fiscal 2001, but an analysis is performed at least annually to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying amount to determine if any impairment exists. The Company performs its annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments. No impairment losses were recorded in the three years ended August 25, 2007.29, 2009. Goodwill was $302.6 million, net of accumulated amortization of $51.2 million, as of August 29, 2009, and August 30, 2008.
38


Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:AutoZone is exposed to market risk from, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel prices. From time to time, the Company uses various financial instruments to reduce such risks. To date, based upon the Company’s current level of foreign operations, hedging costs and past changes in the associated foreign exchange rates, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce foreign exchange rate risk. All of the Company’s hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by AutoZone’s Board of Directors. Further, the Company does not buy or sell financial instruments for trading purposes.

43



AutoZone’s financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, AutoZone reduces its exposure to changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate swap contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps. The Company complies with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 133, 137, 138 and 149 (collectively “SFAS 133”) pertaining to the accounting for these derivatives and hedging activities which require all such interest rate hedge instruments to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. All of the Company’s interest rate hedge instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. Refer to “Note E -G — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”Financial Instruments” for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. Cash flows related to these instruments designated as qualifying hedges are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows in the same categories as the cash flows from the items being hedged. Accordingly, cash flows relating to the settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging the forecasted issuance of debt have been reflected upon settlement as a component of financing cash flows. The resulting gain or loss from such settlement is deferred to other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense over the term of the underlying debt. This reclassification of the deferred gains and losses impacts the interest expense recognized on the underlying debt that was hedged and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows in periods subsequent to settlement. The periodic settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging outstanding variable rate debt is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows.

Foreign Currency:The Company accounts for its Mexican operations using the Mexican peso as the functional currency and converts its financial statements from Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.”dollars. The cumulative loss on currency translation is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and approximated $15.8$45.5 million at August 25, 200729, 2009, and $12.5$1.8 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

Self-Insurance Reserves:The Company retains a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’ compensation, employee health, general, products liability, property and automotivevehicle insurance. Through various methods, which include analyses of historical trends and utilization of actuaries, the Company estimates the costs of these risks. The actuarialcosts are accrued based upon the aggregate of the liability for reported claims and an estimated liability for claims incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on calculations that consider historical lag and claim development factors. The long-term portions of these liabilities are recorded at our estimate of their net present value.

Deferred Rent:The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the course of the lease term, which includes any reasonably assured renewal periods, beginning on the date the Company takes physical possession of the property (see “Note J -L — Leases”). Differences between this calculated expense and cash payments are recorded as a liability in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying balance sheet. This deferred rent approximated $42.6$59.2 million as of August 25, 200729, 2009, and $31.1$51.0 million as of August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

Financial Instruments:The Company has financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets and accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value because of their short maturities. A discussion of the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s debt is included in “Note F -H — Financing,” marketable securities is included in “Note A - Marketable Securities,” and derivatives is included in “Note E-G — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.Financial Instruments.

Income Taxes:The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Our effective tax rate is based on income by tax jurisdiction, statutory rates, and tax saving initiatives available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.
The Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain income tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as the Company must determine the probability of various possible outcomes. The Company reevaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis or when new information becomes available to management. These reevaluations are based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, successfully settled issues under audit, expirations due to statutes, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an increase to the tax accrual.

44


The Company classifies interest related to income tax liabilities as income tax expense, and if applicable, penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense. The income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties that are due within one year of the balance sheet date are presented as current liabilities. The remaining portion of the income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties are presented as noncurrent liabilities because payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date. These noncurrent income tax liabilities are recorded in the caption “Other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.
39

Sales and Use Taxes:Governmental authorities assess sales and use taxes on the sale of goods and services. The Company excludes taxes collected from customers in its reported sales results; such amounts are reflected as accrued expenses and other until remitted to the taxing authorities.

Revenue Recognition:The Company recognizes sales at the time the sale is made and the product is delivered to the customer. Revenue from sales are presented net of allowances for estimated sales returns, which are based on historical return rates.

A portion of the Company'sCompany’s transactions include the sale of auto parts that contain a core component. The core component represents the recyclable portion of the auto part. Customers are not charged for the core component of the new part if a used core is returned at the point of sale of the new part; otherwise the Company charges customers a specified amount for the core component. The Company refunds that same amount upon the customer returning a used core to the store at a later date. The Company does not recognize sales or cost of sales for the core component of these transactions when a used part is returned or expected to be returned from the customer.

Vendor Allowances and Advertising Costs:The Company receives various payments and allowances from its vendors based on the volumethrough a variety of purchasesprograms and for services that AutoZone provides to the vendors.arrangements. Monies received from vendors include rebates, allowances and promotional funds. The amounts to be received are subject to purchase volumes and the terms of the vendor agreements, which generally do not state an expiration date, but are subject to ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in the future based on changes in market conditions, vendor marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or sell-through of the related merchandise. The Company’s level of advertising and other operating, selling, general and administrative expenditures are not dependent on vendor allowances.

Rebates and other miscellaneous incentives are earned based on purchases or product sales and are accrued ratably over the purchase or sale of the related product, but only if it is reasonably certain that the required volume levels will be reached.product. These monies are recorded as a reduction of inventories and are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventories are sold.

For all allowances and promotional funds earned under vendor funding, the Company applies the guidance pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”), by recordingThe majority of the vendor funds received is recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and is recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as these inventories are sold. For arrangements that provide for reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by the Company in selling the vendors’ products, the vendor funds are recorded as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses in the period in which the specific costs were incurred.
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense, net of vendor promotional funds, was $72.1 million in fiscal 2009, $86.2 million in fiscal 2008, and $85.9 million in fiscal 2007. Vendor promotional funds, which reduced advertising expense, amounted to $9.7 million in fiscal 2009, $2.9 million in fiscal 2008, and zero in fiscal 2007.
Cost of Sales and Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:The following illustrates the primary costs classified in each major expense category:
Cost of Sales
Total cost of merchandise sold, including:
Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from the Company’s vendors to the distribution centers and to the retail stores
Vendor allowances that are not reimbursements for specific, incremental and identifiable costs
Cost associated with operating the Company’s supply chain, including payroll and benefit costs, warehouse occupancy costs, transportation costs and depreciation
Inventory shrinkage

45


Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Payroll and benefit costs for store and store support employees;
Occupancy costs of retail and store support facilities;
Depreciation related to retail and store support assets;
Transportation costs associated with commercial deliveries;
Advertising;
Self insurance costs; and
Other administrative costs, such as credit card transaction fees, supplies, and travel and lodging
Warranty Costs:The Company or the vendors supplying its products provides its customers limited warranties on certain products that range from 30 days to lifetime. In most cases, the Company’s vendors are primarily responsible for warranty claims. Warranty costs relating to merchandise sold under warranty not covered by vendors are estimated and recorded as warranty obligations at the time of sale based on each product’s historical return rate. These obligations, which are often funded by vendor allowances, are recorded as a component of accrued expenses. For vendor allowances that are in excess of the related estimated warranty expense for the vendor’s products, the excess is recorded in inventory and recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the inventories arerelated inventory is sold. The Company’s vendor funding arrangements do not provide for any reimbursement arrangements that are for specific, incremental, identifiable costs that are permitted under EITF 02-16 for the funding to be recorded as a reduction to advertising or other operating, selling, general and administrative expenses.

Advertising expense was approximately $85.9 million in fiscal 2007, $78.1 million in fiscal 2006, and $90.3 million in fiscal 2005. The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.

Warranty Costs: The Company or the vendors supplying its products provide its customers with limited warranties on certain products. Estimated warranty obligations for which the Company is responsible are based on historical experience, provided at the time of sale of the product, and charged to cost of sales.

Shipping and Handling Costs:The Company does not generally charge customers separately for shipping and handling. Substantially all the cost the Company incurs to ship products to our stores is included in cost of sales.

Pre-opening Expenses:Pre-opening expenses, which consist primarily of payroll and occupancy costs, are expensed as incurred.

Earnings Per Share:Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding shares adjusted for the effect of common stock equivalents, which are primarily stock options. Stock options that were not included in the diluted computation because they would have been anti-dilutive were approximately 30,000 shares at August 29, 2009, 31,000 shares at August 30, 2008, and 8,000 shares at August 25, 2007, 700,000 shares at August 26, 2006, and 1.0 million shares at August 27, 2005.2007.
40


Stock Options: At August 25, 2007, the Company hasShare-Based Payments:Share-based payments include stock option plans that provide for the purchase ofgrants and certain other transactions under the Company’s common stock by certain of its employees and directors, which are described more fully in “Note B - Share-Based Payments.” Effective August 28, 2005, theplans. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) and began recognizingrecognizes compensation expense for its share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. See “Note B - Share-Based Payments” for further discussion.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:TheIn September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB InterpretationStatement No. 48, “Accounting158, “Employers’ Accounting for UncertaintyDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively postretirement benefit plans) to: recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) in June 2006. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized instatement of financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 will be effective for AutoZone’sposition, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year beginning August 26, 2007. The Company has not determined the effect, if any, that the adoptionyear-end statement of FIN 48 will have on the Company’s financial position and resultsprovide additional disclosures.
On August 25, 2007, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions and on August 31, 2008, the company adopted the measurement date provisions. The adoption of operations.these provisions had no material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Refer to “Note K-Pension and Savings Plans” for further description of these adoptions.

In September 2006,On August 31, 2008, the FASB issuedCompany adopted, FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective for AutoZone in fiscal 2009.There is a one-year deferral of the adoption of this standard as it relates to nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The Company is still in the processadoption of evaluating thethis statement did not have a material impact if any, that SFAS 157 will have on the Company’sconsolidated financial position and results of operations.

On September 29, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans -- An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R" ("SFAS 158"). This new standard requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan's overfunded status or a liability for a plan's underfunded status and (b) measure a plan's assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer's fiscal year (with limited exceptions). Those changes will be reported in comprehensive income. The Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158 during 2007 and will adopt the measurement date provisions in 2009. Please refer to Note I (Pension and Savings Plan) for further description of this adoption.

statements.
In FebruaryDecember 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 141R, “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141R”). This standard significantly changes the accounting for and reporting of business combinations in consolidated financial statements. Among other things, SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and requires the expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs. The standard is effective for the Company beginning August 30, 2009, and is applicable only to transactions occurring after the effective date.

46


In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133,” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends SFAS No. 133 to improve the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by providing enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 (“FSP 107-1”) and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28-1 (“APB 28-1”), “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value Option forof Financial AssetsInstruments,” amending the disclosure requirements in SFAS 107 and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This new standard permits entities to choose to measure manyAPB Opinion 28. FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods in addition to annual reporting periods. These disclosures will be required commencing with the Company’s fiscal quarter beginning August 30, 2009.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and certain other items at fair value.disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS 159165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted SFAS 165 on August 29, 2009, and it had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued.
In June 2009, the FASB voted to approve the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification will be effective for AutoZone inthe Company commencing with the Company’s fiscal quarter beginning August 30, 2009. The Company is still inFASB Codification does not change U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but combines all authoritative standards such as those issued by the processFASB, the American Institute of evaluatingCertified Public Accountants and the impact, if any, that it will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.Emerging Issues Task Force into a comprehensive, topically organized online database.

Note B - Share-Based Payments

Effective August 28, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) and began recognizing compensation expense for its share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. Share-based payments include stock option grants and certain transactions under the Company’s other stock plans. Prior to August 28, 2005, the Company accounted for share-based payments using the intrinsic-value-based recognition method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). As options were granted at an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant, no stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in net income prior to adopting SFAS 123(R). As the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) under the modified-prospective-transition method, results from prior periods have not been restated.

In accordance with SFAS 123(R), share-based compensation expense recognized since August 27, 2005, is based on the following: a) grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123 for unvested options granted prior to the adoption date; b) grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for options granted subsequent to the adoption date; and c) the discount on shares sold to employees under employee stock purchase plans post-adoption, which represents the difference between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price.

Total share-based expense (a component of operating, selling, general and administrative expenses) was $18.5$19.1 million related to stock options and share purchase plans for fiscal 20072009, $18.4 million for fiscal 2008, and $17.4$18.5 million in the previous year. Beginning infor fiscal 2006, excess tax benefits, tax2007. Tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are classified as a financing cash inflow in accordance with SFAS 123(R).inflow.

47


41


The following sentence illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 for fiscal 2005. For fiscal 2005, the Company had net income of $571.0 million, pro-forma stock-based employee compensation expense of $11.3 million, pro-forma net income of $559.8 million and pro-forma basic and diluted EPS of $7.12 and $7.03, respectively. The value of the options was estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple option pricing model for the option grants.

Under SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate. Under SFAS 123 and APB 25, the Company elected to account for forfeitures when awards were actually forfeited, at which time all previous pro forma expense disclosed for the forfeited awards ($7.3 million in fiscal 2005) was reversed to reduce pro forma expense for that period.

AutoZone grants options to purchase common stock to certain of its employees and directors under various plans at prices equal to the market value of the stock on the dates the options were granted.date of grant. Options have a term of 10 years or 10 years and one day from grant date. Director options generally vest three years from grant date. Employee options generally vest in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Employees and directors generally have 30 days after the service relationship ends, or one year after death, to exercise all vested options. The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated for each vesting date. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the award and each vesting date. The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple-option pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense.

The weighted average for key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted and the compensation expense recorded as well as a summary of the methodology applied to develop each assumption are as follows:

             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
  2009  2008  2007 
             
Expected price volatility  28%  24%  26%
Risk-free interest rates  2.4%  4.1%  4.6%
Weighted average expected lives in years  4.1   4.0   3.9 
Forfeiture rate  10%  10%  10%
Dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
  
Year Ended
 
  
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
August 27,
2005
 
        
Expected price volatility  26% 35% 36%
Risk-free interest rates  4.6% 4.1% 2.8%
Weighted average expected lives in years  3.9  3.3  3.5 
Forfeiture rate  10% 10% n/a 
Dividend yield  0% 0% 0%
Expected Price Volatility -This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. We useThe Company uses actual historical changes in the market value of our stock to calculate the volatility assumption as it is management’s belief that this is the best indicator of future volatility. We calculate daily market value changes from the date of grant over a past period representative of the expected life of the options to determine volatility. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.
Risk-Free Interest Rate -This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term equal to the expected life of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.
Expected Lives -This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding and is based on historical experience. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Options granted have a maximum term of ten years or ten years and one day. An increase in the expected life will increase compensation expense.
42

Forfeiture Rate -This is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or canceled before becoming fully vested. This estimate is based on historical experience.experience at the time of valuation and reduces expense ratably over the vesting period. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease compensation expense. This estimate is evaluated periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.
Dividend Yield -The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was $34.06 during fiscal 2009, $30.28 during fiscal 2008, and $29.04 during fiscal 2007. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $29 million in fiscal 2009, $29 million in fiscal 2008, and $47 million in fiscal 2007. The total fair value of options vested was $16 million in fiscal 2009, $18 million in fiscal 2008 and $12 million in fiscal 2007.
The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised. A summary of outstanding stock options is as follows:
  
Number
of Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
      
Outstanding August 28, 2004  5,011,706 $54.42 
Granted  1,099,465  77.74 
Exercised  (1,741,312) 38.85 
Canceled  
(532,373
)
 
70.91
 
Outstanding August 27, 2005  
3,837,486
  
65.87
 
Granted  749,452  82.75 
Exercised  (737,515) 54.48 
Canceled  
(493,881
)
 
75.49
 
Outstanding August 26, 2006  
3,355,542
  70.73 
Granted  695,298  104.64 
Exercised  (934,677) 66.90 
Canceled  (159,398) 83.19 
Outstanding August 25, 2007  2,956,765 $79.24 
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding atoption activity for the year ended August 25, 2007:29, 2009:
                 
  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Exercise Price  Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)  Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding August 30, 2008  3,101,237  $89.42         
               
Granted  594,442   131.23         
Exercised  (503,839)  80.62         
Canceled  (96,488)  94.19         
               
Outstanding August 29, 2009  3,095,352   98.73   6.44   153,925 
             
Exercisable  1,622,300   82.32   4.92   107,285 
             
Expected to Vest  1,325,747   116.81   8.11   41,947 
             
Available for future grants  3,666,029             
                

48


  
Options Outstanding
 
Options Exercisable 
 
 
 
Range of Exercise Prices 
 
 
 
Number
Outstanding
 
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in Years)
 
 
Number
Exercisable 
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
            
$22.00 - $75.64  1,181,091 $58.44  5.04  884,233 $52.67 
$82.00 - $89.18  987,334  85.35  7.16  387,969  87.12 
$89.30 - $103.44  744,262  101.59  8.89  40,000  95.32 
$116.35 - 129.63  44,078  122.43  9.47     
$22.00 - $129.63  2,956,765 $79.24  6.78  1,312,202 $64.15 
At August 25, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding options was $130 million with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.8 years, of which 1,312,202 of the outstanding options are currently exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of $77.6 million, a weighted average exercise price of $64.15 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.1 years. Shares reserved for future option grants approximated 4.6 million at August 25, 2007. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was $29.04 during fiscal 2007 and $22.86 during fiscal 2006. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $47 million in fiscal 2007 and $27 million in fiscal 2006.

Under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan, a non-employee director may receive no more than one-half of his or hertheir director fees immediately in cash, and the remainder of the fees must be taken in common stock. The director may elect to receive up to 100% of the fees in stock or may be deferreddefer all or part of the fees in units (“Director Units”) with value equivalent to the value of shares of common stock as of the grant date (“Stock Units”).date. At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company has $2.6 million accrued related to 21,32317,506 director units issued under the current and prior plans with 84,68178,943 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the current plan.
43


Under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Stock Option Plan”), each non-employee director receives an option to purchase 1,500 shares of common stockgrant on January 1 of each year, and each director who owns common stock or Stock Units worth at least five times the annual retainer fee receives an additional option to purchase 1,500 shares. In addition, each new non-employee director receives an option to purchase 3,000 shares upon election to the Board of Directors, plus a portion of the annual directors’ option grant prorated for the portion of the year actually served in office. Under the Director Compensation Program, each non-employee director may choose between two pay options, and the number of stock options a director receives under the Director Stock Option Plan depends on which pay option the director chooses. Directors who elect to be paid only the Base Retainer will receive, on January 1 during their first two years of services as a director, an option to purchase 3,000 shares of AutoZone common stock. After the first two years, such directors will receive, on January 1 of each year, an option to purchase 1,500 shares of common stock, and each such director who owns common stock or Director Units worth at least five times the Base Retainer will receive an additional option to purchase 1,500 shares. Directors electing to be paid a Supplemental Retainer in addition to the Base Retainer will receive, on January 1 during their first two years of service as a director, an option to purchase 2,000 shares of AutoZone common stock. After the first two years, such directors will receive an option to purchase 500 shares of common stock, and each such director who owns common stock or Stock Units worth at least five times the Base Retainer will receive an additional option to purchase 1,500 shares. These stock option grants are made at the fair market value as of the grant date. At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, there were 95,552are 114,516 outstanding options with 287,948232,984 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan.

During June, 2007, the Board of Directors approved certain changes to the Director Compensation Plan and Director Stock Option Plan. For further discussion on the changes, see the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 12, 2007.

The Company recognized $1.1$0.9 million in expense related to the discount on the selling of shares to employees and executives under various share purchase plans in fiscal 20072009, $0.7 million in fiscal 2008 and $884,000$1.1 million in the prior year.fiscal 2007. The employee stock purchase plan, which is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, permits all eligible employees to purchase AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last day of each calendar quarter through payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per employee or 10 percent of compensation, whichever is less. Under the plan, 29,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2009, 36,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2008, and 39,139 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2007, 51,1672007. The Company repurchased 37,190 shares were sold to employeesat fair value in fiscal 2006, and 59,4792009, 39,235 shares were soldat fair value in fiscal 2005. The Company repurchased2008, and 65,152 shares at fair value in fiscal 2007 62,293 shares at fair value in fiscal 2006, and 87,974 shares in fiscal 2005 from employees electing to sell their stock. Issuances of shares under the employee stock purchase plans are netted against repurchases and such repurchases are not included in share repurchases disclosed in “Note H -J — Stock Repurchase Program.” At August 25, 2007, 385,89729, 2009, 320,603 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan. Additionally,Once executives may participate inhave reached the maximum under the employee stock purchase plan, the Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan which permits all eligible executives to purchase AutoZone’s common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases under this plan were 1,705 shares in fiscal 2009, 1,793 shares in fiscal 2008, and 1,257 shares in fiscal 2007, 811 shares in fiscal 2006, and 5,366 shares in fiscal 2005.2007. At August 25, 2007, 263,03729, 2009, 259,539 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan.

On December 13, 2006, stockholders approved the AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan and the AutoZone, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan. There have been no other material modifications to the Company’s stock plans during fiscal 2007, 2006, or 2005.
Note C - Accrued Expenses and Other

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

        
 August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands)
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
  2009 2008 
      
Medical and casualty insurance claims (current portion) 
$
52,037
 
$
49,844
  $65,024 $55,270 
Accrued compensation; related payroll taxes and benefits  101,467  101,089 
Property and sales taxes  61,570  54,623 
Accrued compensation, related payroll taxes and benefits 121,192 98,054 
Property, sales, and other taxes 92,065 87,174 
Accrued interest  22,241  25,377  32,448 26,375 
Accrued gift cards 16,337 11,659 
Accrued sales and warranty returns  8,634  8,238  12,432 9,983 
Capital lease obligations   16,015    16,735 15,917 
Other  
45,669
  
41,248
  25,038 23,233 
 
$
307,633
 
$
280,419
      
 $381,271 $327,664 
     
The Company retains a significant portion of the insurance risks associated with workers’ compensation, employee health, general, products liability, property and automotive insurance. Beginning in fiscal 2004, aA portion of these self-insured losses is managed through a wholly owned insurance captive. The Company maintains certain levels for stop-loss coverage for each self-insured plan in order to limit its liability for large claims. The limits are per claim and are $1.5 million for workers’ compensation $500,000and property, $0.5 million for employee health, and $1.0 million for general, products liability, property, and automotive. Self-insurance costs are accrued based upon the aggregate of the liability for reported claims and an estimated liability for claims incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on calculations that consider historical lag and claim development factors.

49


44


The Company or the vendors supplying its products provide its customers limited warranties on certain products that range from 30 days to lifetime warranties. In most cases, the Company’s vendors are primarily responsible for warranty claims. Warranty costs relating to merchandise sold under warranty not covered by vendors are estimated and recorded as warranty obligations at the time of sale based on each product’s historical return rate. These obligations, which are often funded by vendor allowances, are recorded as a component of accrued expenses. For vendor allowances that are in excess of the related estimated warranty expense for the vendor’s products, the excess is reclassified to inventory and recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventory is sold. Changes in the Company’s accrued sales and warranty returns during the fiscal year were minimal.

Note D - Income Taxes

The provision for income tax expense consisted of the following:
            
 Year Ended 
 
Year Ended 
  August 29, August 30, August 25, 
(in thousands)
 
August 25,
2007 
 
August 26,
2006 
 
August 27,
2005 
  2009 2008 2007 
        
Current:           
Federal 
$
292,166
 
$
272,916
 
$
296,849
  $303,929 $285,516 $292,166 
State  
23,468
  
23,539
  
21,981
  26,450 20,516 23,468 
  315,634  296,455  318,830        
 330,379 306,032 315,634 
 
Deferred:           
Federal  22,878  30,065  (11,271) 46,809 51,997 22,878 
State  
1,966
  
6,241
  
(5,357
)
  (491) 7,754 1,966 
  
24,844
  
36,306
  
(16,628
)
       
 
$
340,478
 
$
332,761
 
$
302,202
  46,318 59,751 24,844 
       
Total provision for income taxes $376,697 $365,783 $340,478 
       
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes is as follows:

             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
  2009  2008  2007 
             
Federal tax at statutory U.S. income tax rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
State income taxes, net  1.6%  1.8%  1.8%
Other  (0.2%)  (0.5%)  (0.4%)
          
Effective tax rate  36.4%  36.3%  36.4%
          
  
Year Ended 
 
(in thousands) 
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
August 27,
2005
 
        
Federal tax at statutory U.S. income tax rate 
$
327,653
 
$
315,713
 $305,627 
State income taxes, net  16,532  19,357  10,806 
Tax benefit on repatriation of foreign earnings  -  -  (16,351)
Other  
(3,707
)
 
(2,309
)
 2,120 
  
$
340,478
 
$
332,761
 $302,202 
The American Jobs Creation Act (the “Act”), signed into law in October 2004, provided an opportunity to repatriate foreign earnings, reinvest them in the United States, and claim an 85% dividend received deduction on the repatriated earnings provided certain criteria were met. During fiscal 2005, the Company determined that it met the criteria of the Act and began the process of repatriating approximately $36.7 million from its Mexican subsidiaries. As the Company had previously provided deferred income taxes on these amounts, the planned repatriation resulted in a $16.4 million reduction to income tax expense for fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2006, the Company completed the originally planned $36.7 million repatriation plus an additional $4.5 million in accumulated earnings.
45


Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
        
 August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands)
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
  2009 2008 
      
Net deferred tax assets:       
Deferred tax assets: 
Domestic net operating loss and credit carryforwards $18,573 $18,694  $23,119 $20,259 
Foreign net operating loss and credit carryforwards  6,257  4,017  1,369 4,857 
Insurance reserves  13,683  13,748  14,769 7,933 
Accrued benefits 32,976 27,991 
Pension  -  9,167  26,273  
Accrued benefits  20,750  14,927 
Other  15,640  15,291  35,836 39,204 
     
Total deferred tax assets  74,903  75,844  134,342 100,244 
Less: Valuation allowances  (8,154) (8,698)
Less valuation allowances  (7,116)  (7,551)
     
Net deferred tax assets  66,749  67,146  127,226 92,693 
     
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Property and equipment  8,296  13,118  36,472 24,186 
Inventory  103,233  68,449  192,715 149,318 
Derivatives  2,068  3,643 
Pension  2,369  -   1,620 
Prepaid expenses  10,192  9,821  11,517 13,658 
Other  1,412  1,576  3,323 2,431 
     
Deferred tax liabilities  127,570  96,607  244,027 191,213 
     
Net deferred tax liabilities $(60,821)$(29,461) $(116,801) $(98,520)
     
Deferred taxes are not provided for temporary differences of approximately $47.1 million at August 29, 2009, and $26.5 million of August 30, 2008, representing earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries as such earningsthat are intended to be permanently reinvested inreinvested. Computation of the business.potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable.

50



For the years endedAt August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and August 26, 2006,30, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets of $9.1$8.4 million and $9.0$8.6 million from federal tax net operating losses ("NOLs"(“NOLs”) of $25.9$24.0 million and $25.7$24.6 million, and deferred tax assets of $1.8$1.3 million and $2.7$1.5 million from state tax NOLs of $51.3$24.6 million and $65.1$32.8 million, respectively. As ofAt August 25, 200729, 2009, and August 30, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets of $3.1$1.3 million and $3.8 million from Non-U.S. NOLs of $7.9 million.$3.3 million and $9.7 million, respectively. The federal, state, and Non-U.S. NOLs expire between fiscal 20082010 and fiscal 2027. The2028. At August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008, the Company maintainshad a $7.2 million valuation allowance againstof $6.8 million and $7.0 million, respectively, for certain federal and state NOLs resulting primarily from annual statutory usage limitations. For the years endingAt August 25, 2007,29, 2009 and August 26, 2006,30, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets of $10.9$13.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, for federal, state, and Non-U.S. income tax credit carryforwards. Certain tax credit carryforwards have no expiration date and others will expire in fiscal 20082010 through fiscal 2017. A2030. At August 29, 2009, and August 30, 2008, the Company had a valuation allowance of $1.0$0.4 million has been established by the Companyand $0.5 million for credits subject to such expiration periods.

Note E - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

periods, respectively.
AutoZone has utilizedadopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”) on August 26, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest rate swapsand penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a decrease to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debtthe beginning balance of retained earnings of $26.9 million at the date of adoption. Including this cumulative effect amount, the liability recorded for total unrecognized tax benefits upon adoption at August 26, 2007, was $49.2 million.
A reconciliation of the beginning and to lockending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
         
(in thousands) August 29, 2009  August 30, 2008 
Beginning balance $40,759  $49,240 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year  5,511   6,181 
Additions for tax positions of prior years  9,567   65 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  (5,679)  (8,890)
Reductions due to settlements  (2,519)  (3,201)
Reductions due to statue of limitations  (3,447)  (2,636)
       
Ending balance $44,192  $40,759 
       
Included in fixed ratesthe August 29, 2009, balance is $28.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate.
The Company accrues interest on future debt issuances. AutoZone reflects the current fair value of all interest rate hedge instruments in its consolidated balance sheetsunrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. The Company had $12.4 million and $15.0 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits at August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2008 respectively.
The major jurisdictions where the Company files income tax returns are the United States and Mexico. With few exceptions, tax returns filed for tax years 2004 through 2008 remain open and subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities. The Company is typically engaged in various tax examinations at any given time, both by U. S. federal and state taxing jurisdictions and Mexican tax authorities. As of August 29, 2009 the Company estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $18.7 million over the next twelve months as a result of tax audit closings, settlements, and the expiration of statutes to examine such returns in various jurisdictions. While the Company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjustments, the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates.
Note E- Fair Value Measurements
Effective August 31, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. This standard defines fair value as the price received to transfer an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value by creating a hierarchy of valuation inputs used to measure fair value, and although it does not require additional fair value measurements, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

51


The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels:
Level 1 inputs—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. An active market for the asset or liability is one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide ongoing pricing information.
Level 2 inputs—inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include, but are not limited to, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rate curves and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, credit risk and default rates.
Level 3 inputs—unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
At August 29, 2009, the fair value measurement amounts for assets and liabilities recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of short-term investments (Level 1) of $69.3 million, which are included within other current assets. AllShort-term investments are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the Company’slast business day of the quarter.
Note F — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income includes certain adjustments to pension liabilities, foreign currency translation adjustments, certain activity for interest rate hedge instruments are designatedswaps that qualify as cash flow hedges. hedges and unrealized gains and (losses) on available-for-sale securities.
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss consisted of the following:
                         
          Unrealized          
          Loss (Gain)  Net Loss  Reclassification    
  Pension  Foreign  on  (Gain) on  of Net Gains on  Accumulated 
  Liability  Currency  Marketable  Outstanding  Derivatives into  Other 
  Adjustments,  Translation  Securities,  Derivatives,  Earnings, net of  Comprehensive 
(in thousands) net of taxes  Adjustments  net of taxes  net of taxes  taxes  Loss 
Balance at August 25, 2007 $2,453  $15,763  $77  $(3,654) $(5,089) $9,550 
Current-Year activity  1,817   (13,965)  (263)  6,398   598   (5,415)
                   
Balance at August 30, 2008  4,270   1,798   (186)  2,744   (4,491)  4,135 
Current-Year activity  46,945   43,655   (568)  (2,744)  612   87,900 
                   
Balance at August 29, 2009 $51,215  $45,453  $(754) $  $(3,879) $92,035 
                   
The pension adjustment of $46.9 million reflects actuarial losses not yet reflected in the periodic pension cost caused primarily by the significant losses on pension assets in the current year. The foreign currency translation adjustment of $43.7 million during fiscal 2009 was attributable to the weakening of the Mexican Peso against the US Dollar, which as of August 29, 2009, had decreased by approximately 30% when compared to August 30, 2008.

52


Note G — Derivative Financial Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company hadwas party to an outstanding interest rate swap withagreement related to its $300 million term floating rate loan, which bore interest based on the three month London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and matured in December, 2009. Under this agreement, which was accounted for as a fair value of $5.8 million at August 25, 2007 and $10.2 million at August 26, 2006, to effectively fixcash flow hedge, the interest rate on the $300.0 million term loan entered into during December 2004. At August 28, 2004, the Company had an outstanding five-year forward-starting interest rate swap with a notional amount of $300 million. This swap had a fair value of $4.6 millionwas effectively fixed for its entire term at August 28, 20044.4% and effectiveness was settled during November 2004 with no debt being issued. Consequently, $4.6 million was recognized in earnings during fiscal 2005.

measured each reporting period.
The related gains and losseseffective portion of the gain or loss on interest rate hedges arewas deferred in stockholders’ equityand reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses arewere recognized in income as a decrease or increase to interest expense in the period in which the related cash flows being hedged arewere recognized in expense. However,During August 2009, the Company elected to prepay, without penalty, the extent thatentire $300 million term loan. The outstanding liability associated with the change in value of an interest rate hedge instrument does not perfectly offsetswap totaled $3.6 million, and was immediately expensed in earnings upon termination. The Company recognized $5.9 million as increases to interest expense during the change incurrent fiscal year related to payments associated with the interest rate swap agreement prior to its termination. At August 30, 2008, the fair value of the cash flows being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. The Company’s hedge instruments have been determined to be highly effective as of August 25, 2007.

46


The following table summarizes the fiscal 2007 and 2006 activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss as it relates tooutstanding interest rate hedge instruments:swap was a negative $4.3 million.

(in thousands)
 
Before-Tax
Amount
 
Income
Tax
 
After-Tax
Amount
 
        
Accumulated net gains as of August 27, 2005 
$
10,618
 $(1,589)
$
9,029
 
Net gains on outstanding derivatives  5,904  (2,152) 3,752 
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (612)   (612)
Accumulated net gains as of August 26, 2006  
15,910
  (3,741) 
12,169
 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives  (4,440) 1,627  (2,813)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (612)   (612)
Accumulated net gains as of August 25, 2007 
$
10,858
 $(2,114)
$
8,744
 

The Company primarily executes derivative transactions of relatively short duration with strong creditworthy counterparties. These counterparties exposeAt August 29, 2009, the Company to credit risk in the event of non-performance. The amount of such exposure is limited to the unpaid portion of amounts due to the Company pursuant to the terms of the derivative financial instruments, if any. Although there are no collateral requirements, if a downgrade in the credit rating of these counterparties occurs, management believes that this exposure is mitigated by provisions in the derivative agreements which allow for the legal right of offset of any amounts due to the Company from the counterparties with amounts payable, if any, to the counterparties by the Company. Management considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.

As of August 25, 2007, the Company estimates $600,000 of gains currently includedhad $3.9 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income related to be reclassednet realized gains associated with terminated interest derivatives, which were designated as hedges. Net gains are amortized into earnings withinover the next 12 months.remaining life of the associated debt. For the fiscal year ended August 29, 2009, the Company reclassified $612,000 of net gains from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense.

Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments
The Company is dependent upon diesel fuel to operate its vehicles used in the Company’s distribution network to deliver parts to its stores and unleaded fuel for delivery of parts from its stores to its commercial customers or other stores. Fuel is not a material component of the Company’s operating costs; however, the Company attempts to secure fuel at the lowest possible cost and to reduce volatility in its operating costs. Because unleaded and diesel fuel include transportation costs and taxes, there are limited opportunities to hedge this exposure directly. However, during fiscal year 2009, the Company used a derivative financial instrument based on the Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending (RBOB) index to economically hedge the commodity cost associated with its unleaded fuel.
The fuel swap did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and was executed to economically hedge a portion of unleaded fuel purchases. The notional amount of the contract was 2.5 million gallons and terminated August 31, 2009. The loss on the fuel contract for fiscal 2009 was $2.3 million.

53


Note F -H — Financing

The Company’s long-term debt consisted of the following:
         
  August 29,  August 30, 
(in thousands) 2009  2008 
Bank Term Loan due December 2009, effective interest rate of 4.40% $  $300,000 
4.75% Senior Notes due November 2010, effective interest rate of 4.17%  199,300   200,000 
5.875% Senior Notes due October 2012, effective interest rate of 6.33%  300,000   300,000 
4.375% Senior Notes due June 2013, effective interest rate of 5.65%  200,000   200,000 
6.5% Senior Notes due January 2014, effective interest rate of 6.63%  500,000   500,000 
5.75% Senior Notes due January 2015, effective interest rate of 5.89%  500,000    
5.5% Senior Notes due November 2015, effective interest rate of 4.86%  300,000   300,000 
6.95% Senior Notes due June 2016, effective interest rate of 7.09%  200,000   200,000 
7.125% Senior Notes due August 2018, effective interest rate of 7.28%  250,000   250,000 
Commercial paper, weighted average interest rate of 0.5% at August 29, 2009  277,600    
       
  $2,726,900  $2,250,000 
       
(in thousands)
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
Bank Term Loan due December 2009, effective interest rate of 4.55% 
$
300,000
 
$
300,000
 
5.875% Senior Notes due October 2012, effective interest rate of 6.33%  
300,000
  
300,000
 
5.5% Senior Notes due November 2015, effective interest rate of 4.86%  300,000  300,000 
4.75% Senior Notes due November 2010, effective interest rate of 4.17%  200,000  200,000 
4.375% Senior Notes due June 2013, effective interest rate of 5.65%  200,000  200,000 
6.95% Senior Notes due June 2016, effective interest rate of 7.09%  200,000  200,000 
6.5% Senior Notes due July 2008  190,000  190,000 
Commercial paper, weighted average interest rate of 6.1% at August 25, 2007,
and 5.3% at August 26, 2006
  
206,700
  
122,400
 
Other  
38,918
  
44,757
 
  
$
1,935,618
 
$
1,857,157
 
As of August 29, 2009, the commercial paper borrowings mature in the next twelve months but are classified as long-term in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, as the Company has the ability and intent to refinance them on a long-term basis. Specifically, excluding the effect of commercial paper borrowings, the Company had $688.1 million of availability under its $800 million revolving credit facility, expiring in July 2012 that would allow it to replace these short term obligations with long-term financing.

TheIn July 2009, the Company maintainsterminated its $1.0 billion of revolving credit facilitiesfacility, which was scheduled to expire in fiscal 2010, and replaced it with a group of banksan $800 million revolving credit facility. This credit facility is available to primarily support commercial paper borrowings, letters of credit and other short-term unsecured bank loans. These facilities expireThis facility expires in May 2010,July 2012, may be increased to $1.3$1.0 billion at AutoZone’s election and subject to bank credit capacity and approval, may include up to $200 million in letters of credit, and may include up to $100 million in capital leases. Asleases each fiscal year. After reducing the available balance is reduced by commercial paper borrowings and certain outstanding letters of credit, the Company had $680.2$410.5 million in available capacity under these facilitiesthis facility at August 25, 2007. The rate of interest payable under the credit facilities is29, 2009. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a function of Bank of America’s base rate or adefined Eurodollar rate (each as defined inplus the facility agreements), or a combination thereof.applicable percentage, which could range from 150 basis points to 450 basis points, depending upon our senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating.

The $300.0During August 2009, the Company elected to prepay, without penalty, the $300 million bank term loan entered in December 2004, was amended in April 2006 to have similar terms and conditions as the $1.0 billion credit facilities, but with a December 2009 maturity, and was further amended in August 2007 to reduce the interest rate on Euro-dollar loans. That credit agreement with a group of banks providessubsequently amended. The term loan facility provided for a term loan, which consistsconsisted of, at the Company’s election, base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or a combination thereof. The interest accruesentire unpaid principal amount of the term loan would be due and payable in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility was scheduled to terminate. Interest accrued on base rate loans at a base rate per annum equal to the higher of the prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1%. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate plus the applicable percentage, which can range from 30 basis points to 90 basis points, depending upon the Company’s senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating. Based on AutoZone’s ratings at August 25, 2007, the applicable percentage on Eurodollar loans is 35 basis points. The Company may select interest periods of one, two, three or six months for Eurodollar loans, subject to availability. Interest is payable at the end of the selected interest period, but no less frequently than quarterly. AutoZone entered into an interest rate swap agreement on December 29, 2004, to effectively fix, based on current debt ratings, the interest rate of the term loan at 4.4%. AutoZone hasThe outstanding liability associated with the option to extend loans into subsequent interest period(s) or convert them into loans of another interest rate type. The entire unpaid principal amountswap totaled $3.6 million, and was expensed in operating, selling, general and administrative expenses upon termination of the term loan will be duehedge in fiscal 2009.
On June 25, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with ESL Investments, Inc., (the “ESL Agreement”) setting forth certain understandings and payable in fullagreements regarding the voting by ESL Investments, Inc., on December 23, 2009, whenbehalf of itself and its affiliates (collectively, “ESL”), of certain shares of common stock of AutoZone, Inc. and related matters. Among other things, the facility terminates.Company agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to increase the Company’s adjusted debt/EBITDAR target ratio from 2.1:1 to 2.5:1 no later than February 14, 2009. The Company may prepaymet this commitment at February 14, 2009. The Company calculates adjusted debt as the term loan in whole or in part at any time without penalty, subjectsum of total debt, capital lease obligations and rent times six; and the Company calculates EBITDAR by adding interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and stock option expenses to reimbursement ofnet income. At August 29, 2009, the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in the case of prepayment of Eurodollar borrowings.adjusted debt/EBITDAR ratio was 2.5:1.

54


47


During April 2006, the $150.0 million Senior Notes maturing at that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. On June 8, 2006,August 4, 2008, the Company issued $200.0$500 million in 6.95%6.50% Senior Notes due 20162014 and $250 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018 under its existingthe Company’s shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2004.July 29, 2008 (the “Shelf Registration”). That shelf registration allowed the Company to sell up to $300 millionan indeterminate amount in debt securities to fund general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions.
On July 2, 2009, the Company issued $500 million in 5.75% Senior Notes due 2015 under the Shelf Registration statement. The Company used the proceeds to pay down the Company’s commercial paper borrowings, to prepay in full the $300 million term loan in August 2009, and the remainder for general corporate purposes, including for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, new store openings and stock repurchases.
The 6.50% and 7.125% Senior Notes issued during August 2008, and the 5.75% Senior Notes issued in July, 2009, are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the notes are downgraded. They also contain a provision that repayment of the shelf registration was cancellednotes may be accelerated if AutoZone experiences a change in February, 2007.

control (as defined in the agreements). The Company’s borrowings under its Senior Notesthe Company’s other senior notes arrangements contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens. Under itsthe Company’s other borrowing arrangements, covenants include limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision wherethat may require acceleration of the repayment obligations may be accelerated if AutoZone experiences a change in control (as defined in the agreements).under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under the Company’s borrowing arrangements may be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or an event of default occurs.
The $800 million revolving credit agreement requires that the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last day of each quarter shall be no less than 2.50:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. The Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio as of August 29, 2009 was 4.19:1. As of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and expects to remain in compliance with all covenants.

All of the Company’s debt is unsecured. Scheduled maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
Fiscal Year
 
Amount
(in thousands)
 
2008 $435,618 
2009   
2010  300,000 
2011  200,000 
2012   
Thereafter  1,000,000 
  $1,935,618 

The maturities for fiscal 2008 are classified as long-term in the fiscal 2007 consolidated balance sheet as the Company has the ability and intention to refinance them on a long-term basis.

     
  Amount 
Fiscal Year (in thousands) 
2010 $277,600 
2011  199,300 
2012   
2013  500,000 
2014  500,000 
Thereafter  1,250,000 
    
  $2,726,900 
    
The fair value of the Company’s debt was estimated at $1.928$2.853 billion as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and $1.825$2.235 billion as of August 26, 2006,30, 2008, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. Such fair value is greater than the carrying value of debt by $126.5 million at August 29, 2009, and less than the carrying value of debt by $7.6$15.0 million at August 25, 2007, and $32.3 million at August 26, 2006.30, 2008.

Note G -I — Interest Expense

Net interest expense consisted of the following:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
(in thousands) 2009  2008  2007 
Interest expense $147,504  $121,843  $123,311 
Interest income  (3,887)  (3,785)  (2,819)
Capitalized interest  (1,301)  (1,313)  (1,376)
          
  $142,316  $116,745  $119,116 
          
  
Year Ended 
 
(in thousands) 
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
August 27,
2005
 
        
Interest expense 
$
123,311
 
$
112,127
 
$
104,684
 
Interest income  (2,819) (2,253) (1,162)
Capitalized interest  
(1,376
)
 
(1,985
)
 
(1,079
)
  
$
119,116
 
$
107,889
 
$
102,443
 

55


48

Note H -J — Stock Repurchase Program

During 1998, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The program was most recentlylast amended inon June 200717, 2009 to increase the repurchase authorization to $5.9$7.9 billion from $5.4$7.4 billion. From January 1998 to August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company has repurchased a total of 99.3115.4 million shares at an aggregate cost of $5.4$7.6 billion.
The following table summarizes our share repurchase activity for the following fiscal years:

             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
(in thousands) 2009  2008  2007 
             
Amount $1,300,002  $849,196  $761,887 
Shares  9,313   6,802   6,032 
  
Year Ended
 
(in thousands)
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
August 27,
2005
 
        
Amount 
$
761,887
 
$
578,066
 
$
426,852
 
Shares  6,032  6,187  4,822 
From August 30, 2009 to October 26, 2009, the Company repurchased 1.2 million shares for $178.2 million.
Note I -K — Pension and Savings Plans

Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time employees were covered by a defined benefit pension plan. The benefits under the plan were based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation. On January 1, 2003, the plan was frozen. Accordingly, pension plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan.

On January 1, 2003, the Company’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated employees was also frozen. Accordingly, plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, "Employers'“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively postretirement benefit plans) to: recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in the statement of financial position; recognize the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost pursuant to SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions" (SFAS 87);position, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end statement of financial position;position, and provide additional disclosures about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation.disclosures.

For the fiscal year ending August 25, 2007, weThe Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158.158 on August 25, 2007. The effectrecognition provisions of adopting SFAS 158 on the Company’s financial condition at August 25, 2007 has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as described below. SFAS 158's provisions regarding the change in the measurement date of postretirement benefit plans will require the Company to change its measurement date, beginning in fiscal year 2009, from May 31 to its fiscal year end date.

SFAS 158 requiresrequired the Company to recognize the funded status, which is the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligations, of its postretirementdefined benefit pension plans in the August 25, 2007, Consolidated StatementStatements of Financial Position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, (AOCI), net of tax. The adjustment to AOCIaccumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs, both of which were previously netted against the plans'plans’ funded status in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position pursuant to the provisions of SFAS 87.Position. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic pension expense pursuant to the Company’s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts.

49

Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic pension expense in the same periods will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic pension expense on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption of SFAS 158. The effectsadoption of adopting the recognition provisions of SFAS 158 had an immaterial impact on our Consolidated Statementthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.
On August 31, 2008, the Company adopted the measurement date provisions of Financial Position atSFAS 158. The adoption of the measurement date provisions of SFAS 158 had no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007 are presented in the following table:29, 2009.

56



Pension Balances Recorded

(in thousands)
 
Prior to Adopting SFAS 158
 
Effective of Adopting SFAS 158
 
As Reported
 
Other non-current assets $8,780 $(2,796)$5,984 
Current liabilities  2,991  -  2,991 
Deferred income tax liability, net  2,255  (1,089) 1,166 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss $746 $1,707 $2,453 

The investment strategy for pension plan assets is to utilize a diversified mix of domestic and international equity portfolios, together with other investments, to earn a long-term investment return that meets the Company’s pension plan obligations. Active management and alternative investment strategies are utilized within the plan in an effort to minimize risk, while realizing investment returns in excess of market indices.

The weighted average asset allocation for our pension plan assets was as follows at June 30:follows:

  
2007
 
2006
 
  
Current
 
Target
 
Current
 
Target
 
Domestic equities  30.7% 33.5% 32.0% 27.0%
International equities  27.8  23.0  24.5  30.9 
Alternative investments  27.7  30.5  30.5  27.9 
Real estate  11.2  11.0  11.0  12.2 
Cash and cash equivalents  2.6  2.0  2.0  2.0 
   
100.0
%
 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
The measurement date for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans is May 31 of each fiscal year.

50

                 
  August 29, 2009  August 30, 2008 
  Current  Target  Current  Target 
Domestic equities  17.0%  22.5%  22.7%  27.5%
International equities  40.3   34.0   33.3   29.0 
Alternative investments  26.4   30.5   31.4   30.5 
Real estate  8.7   11.0   11.8   11.0 
Cash and cash equivalents  7.6   2.0   0.8   2.0 
             
   100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
             
The following table sets forth the plans’ funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s financial statements:

         
  August 29,  August 30, 
(in thousands) 2009  2008 
         
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
        
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $156,674  $161,064 
Interest cost  10,647   9,962 
Actuarial (gains) losses  23,637   (10,818)
Benefits paid  (5,368)  (3,534)
       
Benefit obligations at end of year $185,590  $156,674 
       
         
Change in Plan Assets:
        
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $160,898  $161,221 
Actual return on plan assets  (40,235)  (940)
Employer contributions  18   4,151 
Benefits paid  (5,368)  (3,534)
       
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $115,313  $160,898 
       
         
Amount Recognized in the Statement of Financial Position:
        
Non-current other assets $  $7,264 
Current liabilities  (17)  (17)
Long-term liabilities  (70,260)  (3,023)
       
Net amount recognized $(70,277) $4,224 
       
         
Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
        
Net actuarial loss $(83,377) $(6,891)
Prior service cost     (60)
       
Accumulated other comprehensive income $(83,377) $(6,951)
       
         
Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and expected to be amortized in next year’s Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
        
Net actuarial loss $(8,354) $(73)
Prior service cost     (60)
       
Amount recognized $(8,354) $(133)
       

57


Net Pension Benefits (Income) Expense:
  
August 25,
 
August 26,
 
(in thousands)
 
2007(1)
 
2006
 
      
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
     
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year  154,942 $176,325 
Interest cost  9,593  9,190 
Actuarial gains  (550) (26,783)
Benefits paid  (2,921) (3,790)
Benefit obligations at end of year $161,064 $154,942 
        
Change in plan assets:
       
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $126,892 $107,551 
Actual return on plan assets  27,797  17,600 
Employer contributions  10,573  6,187 
Benefits paid  (2,921) (3,790)
Administrative expenses  (1,120) (656)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $161,221 $126,892 
        
Reconciliation of funded status:
       
Funded (underfunded) status of the plans $157  ($28,050)
Contributions from measurement date to fiscal year-end  2,836  3,017 
Unrecognized net actuarial losses  -  21,464 
Unamortized prior service cost  -  105 
Net amount recognized $2,993  ($3,464)
        
Amount Recognized in the Statement of Financial Position:
       
Noncurrent other assets $5,984  - 
Current liabilities  (2,991) (7,006)
Long-term liabilities  -  (21,044)
Intangible assets  -  105 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  -  24,481 
Net amount recognized $2,993  ($3,464)
        
Amount Recognized in AOCI and not yet reflected in Net Periodic
       
Benefit Cost:
       
Net actuarial loss  ($3,830)   
Prior service cost  (159)   
AOCI  (3,989)   
        
Amount Recognized in AOCI and not yet reflected in Net Periodic
       
Benefit Cost and expected to be amortized in next year’s net
       
periodic benefit cost:
       
Net actuarial loss $97    
Prior service cost  99    
Amount recognized $196    
             
  Year Ended 
  August 29,  August 30,  August 25, 
(in thousands) 2009  2008  2007 
             
Components of net periodic benefit cost:            
Interest cost $10,647  $9,962  $9,593 
Expected return on plan assets  (12,683)  (13,036)  (10,343)
Amortization of prior service cost  60   99   (54)
Recognized net actuarial losses  73   97   751 
          
Net periodic benefit (income) expense $(1,903) $(2,878) $(53)
          
(1) Incorporates the provisions of SFAS 158 adopted on August 25, 2007.
51

  
Year Ended
 
 
 
August 25,
 
August 26,
 
August 27,
 
(in thousands)
 
2007
 
2006
 
2005
 
        
Components of net periodic benefit cost:       
Interest cost $9,593 $9,190 $8,290 
Expected return on plan assets  (10,343) (8,573) (8,107)
Amortization of prior service cost  (54) (627) (644)
Recognized net actuarial losses  751  5,645  1,000 
Net periodic benefit cost $(53)$5,635 $539 
           
The actuarial assumptions were as follows:
            
 
2007
 
2006
 
2005
  2009 2008 2007 
Weighted average discount rate  6.25% 6.25% 5.25%  6.24%  6.90%  6.25%
       
Expected long-term rate of return on assets  8.00% 8.00% 8.00%  8.00%  8.00%  8.00%
       
As the plan benefits are frozen, increases in future compensation levels no longer impact the calculation and there is no service cost. The discount rate is determined as of the measurement date withand is based on the assistancecalculated yield of actuaries, who calculate the yield on a portfolio of high-grade corporate bonds with cash flows that generally match ourthe Company’s expected benefit payments in future years. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on the historical relationships between the investment classes and the capital markets, updated for current conditions. Prior service cost is amortized over the estimated average remaining service period of active plan participants as of the date the prior service base is established, and the unrecognized actuarial loss is amortized over the estimated remaining service period of 7.81 years at August 25, 2007.

The Company makes annual contributions in amounts at least equal to the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company contributed approximately $18,000 to the plans in fiscal 2009, $1.3 million to the plans in fiscal 2008 and $13.4 million to the plans in fiscal 2007, $9.2 million to the plans in fiscal 2006, and no contributions to the plans in fiscal 2005. Based on current projections, we expect2007. The Company expects to contribute approximately $3.0$4 million to the plan in fiscal 2008;2010; however, a change to the expected cash funding may be impacted by a change in interest rates or a change in the actual or expected return on plan assets.

Based on current assumptions about future events, benefit payments are expected to be paid as follows for each of the following planfiscal years. Actual benefit payments may vary significantly from the following estimates:

Plan Year Ending December 31
 
Amount
(in thousands)
 
2007 
$
3,506
 
2008  
4,114
 
2009  
4,742
 
2010  
5,318
 
2011  
5,847
 
2012 - 2016  
39,101
 

     
  Amount 
Fiscal Year (in thousands) 
2010 $4,737 
2011  5,313 
2012  5,844 
2013  6,476 
2014  7,175 
2015 — 2019  45,527 
The Company has a 401(k) plan that covers all domestic employees who meet the plan’s participation requirements. The plan features include Company matching contributions, immediate 100% vesting of Company contributions and a savings option up to 25% of qualified earnings. The Company makes matching contributions, per pay period, up to a specified percentage of employees’ contributions as approved by the Board of Directors. The Company made matching contributions to employee accounts in connection with the 401(k) plan of $11.0 million in fiscal 2009, $10.8 million in fiscal 2008 and $9.5 million in fiscal 2007, $8.6 million in fiscal 2006, and $8.4 million in fiscal 2005.2007.

Note J -L — Leases

The Company leases some of its retail stores, distribution centers, facilities, land and equipment, including vehicles. Most of these leases are operating leases and include renewal options, at the Company’s election, and some include options to purchase and provisions for percentage rent based on sales. Rental expense was $181.3 million in fiscal 2009, $165.1 million in fiscal 2008, and $152.5 million in fiscal 2007, $143.9 million in fiscal 2006, and $150.6 million in fiscal 2005.2007. Percentage rentals were insignificant.
52


The Company has a fleet of vehicles used for delivery to ourits commercial customers and travel for members of field management. The majority of these vehicles are held under capital lease. At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had capital lease assets of $54.4$53.9 million, net of accumulated amortization of $11.2$25.4 million, and capital lease obligations of $55.1$54.8 million. The $16.0$16.7 million current portion of these obligations was recorded as a component of other current liabilities, and the $39.1$38.1 million long-term portion was recorded as a component of other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

Based on clarifications from the Securities and Exchange Commission, during fiscal 2005, At August 30, 2008, the Company completed a detailed reviewhad capital lease assets of its accounting for rent expense$62.4 million, net of accumulated amortization of $14.4 million, and expected useful livescapital lease obligations of leasehold improvements. $64.1 million, of which $15.9 million was recorded as current liabilities and $48.2 million was recorded as long-term liabilities.

58


The Company noted inconsistencies in the periods used to amortize leasehold improvements and the periods used to straight-line rent expense. The Company revised its policy to recordrecords rent for all operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal periods and the period of time prior to the lease term that the Company is in possession of the leased space for the purpose of installing leasehold improvements. Differences between recorded rent expense and cash payments are recorded as a liability in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities on the balance sheet. This deferred rent approximated $42.6$59.5 million on August 25, 200729, 2009, and $31.1$51.0 million on August 26, 2006.30, 2008. Additionally, all leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the remainder of the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal periods, in effect when the leasehold improvements are placed in service. During the quarter ended February 12, 2005, the Company recorded an adjustment in the amount of $40.3 million pre-tax ($25.4 million after-tax), which lowered fiscal 2005 diluted earnings per share by $0.32. This adjustment included the impact on prior years, to reflect additional amortization of leasehold improvements and additional rent expense as if this new policy had always been followed by the Company. The impact of the adjustment on any prior year would have been immaterial.

Minimum annual rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases and capital leases were as follows at the end of fiscal 2007:2009:

  
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
 
Operating
 
Capital
 
Fiscal Year
 
Leases
 
Leases
 
2008 $171,163 $16,015 
2009  155,446  15,535 
2010  136,524  13,393 
2011  117,452  10,404 
2012  97,532  7,163 
Thereafter  634,135  - 
Total minimum payments required $1,312,252  62,510 
Less: interest     (7,422)
Present value of minimum capital lease payments    $55,088 
         
  Operating  Capital 
Fiscal Year (in thousands) Leases  Leases 
2010 $177,781  $16,932 
2011  167,760   16,402 
2012  151,890   13,729 
2013  135,348   7,420 
2014  115,801   1,220 
Thereafter  809,447    
       
Total minimum payments required $1,558,027   55,703 
        
Less: interest      (939)
        
Present value of minimum capital lease payments     $54,764 
        
In connection with the Company’s December 2001 sale of the TruckPro business, the Company subleased some properties to the purchaser for an initial term of not less than 20 years. The Company’s remaining aggregate rental obligation at August 25, 200729, 2009 of $25.3$22.1 million is included in the above table, but the obligation is entirely offset by the sublease rental agreement.

Note K -M — Commitments and Contingencies

Construction commitments, primarily for new stores, totaled approximately $23.8$18.7 million at August 25, 2007.

29, 2009.
The Company had $113.3$111.9 million in outstanding standby letters of credit and $11.3$14.8 million in surety bonds as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, which all have expiration periods of less than one year. A substantial portion of the outstanding standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis) and surety bonds are used to cover reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers. There are no additional contingent liabilities associated with these instruments as the underlying liabilities are already reflected in ourthe consolidated balance sheet. The standby letters of credit and surety bonds arrangements have automatic renewal clauses.
53


Note L -N — Litigation

AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit entitled "Coalition“Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc. et al.," filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2004. The case was filed by more than 200 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers (collectively “Plaintiffs”), against a number of defendants, including automotive aftermarket retailers and aftermarket automotive parts manufacturers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that some or all of the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants have knowingly received, in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (the “Act”), from various of the manufacturer defendants benefits

59


such as volume discounts, rebates, early buy allowances and other allowances, fees, inventory without payment, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers'manufacturers’ profits, benefits of pay on scan purchases, implementation of radio frequency identification technology, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers. Additionally, a subset of plaintiffs alleges a claim of fraud against the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants based on discovery issues in a prior litigation involving similar Robinson-Patman Act claims. In the prior litigation, the discovery dispute, as well as the underlying claims, were decided in favor of AutoZone and the other automotive aftermarket retailer defendants who proceeded to trial, pursuant to a unanimous jury verdict which was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the current litigation, plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages (including statutory trebling), attorneys'attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting the aftermarket retailer defendants from inducing and/or knowingly receiving discriminatory prices from any of the aftermarket manufacturer defendants and from opening up any further stores to compete with plaintiffs as long as defendants allegedly continue to violate the Act. The Company believes this suit to be without merit and is vigorously defending against it. The Company is unable to estimate a loss or possible range of loss as of August 29, 2009. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss all claims with prejudice on substantive and procedural grounds. Additionally, the Defendants have sought to enjoin plaintiffs from filing similar lawsuits in the future. If granted in their entirety, these dispositive motions would resolve the litigation in Defendants'Defendants’ favor.

On June 22, 2005, the Attorney General of the State of California, in conjunction with District Attorneys for San Bernardino, San Joaquin and Monterey Counties, filed suit in the San Bernardino County Superior Court against AutoZone, Inc. and its California subsidiaries. The San Diego County District Attorney later joined the suit. The lawsuit alleges that AutoZone failed to follow various state statutes and regulation governing the storage and handling of used motor oil and other materials collected for recycling or used for cleaning AutoZone stores and parking lots. The suit sought $12 million in penalties and injunctive relief. On June 1, 2007, AutoZone and the State entered into a Stipulated Final Judgment by Consent. The Stipulated Final Judgment amended the suit to also allege weights and measures (pricing) violations. Pursuant to this Judgment, AutoZone is enjoined from committing these types of violations and agreed to pay civil penalties in the amount of $1.8 million, including $1.5 million in cash and a $300,000 credit for work performed to insure compliance.

The Company currently, and from time to time, is involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. Although the amount of liability that may result from these other proceedings cannot be ascertained, the Company does not currently believe that, in the aggregate, these matters will result in liabilities material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
54


Note M -O — Segment Reporting

The Company’s two operating segments (Domestic Auto Parts and Mexico) have been aggregated as one reportable segment: Auto Parts Stores. The criteria the Company used to identify the reportable segment are primarily the nature of the products the Company sells and the operating results that are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about the resources to be allocated to the business units and to assess performance. The accounting policies of the Company’s reportable segment are the same as those described in Note A.
The Auto Parts Stores segment is a retailer and distributor of automotive parts and accessories through the Company’s 4,417 stores in the United States, including Puerto Rico and Mexico. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products.
The “Other” category reflects business activities that are not separately reportable, including ALLDATA which produces, sells and maintains diagnostic and repair information software used in the automotive repair industry, and E-commerce, which includes direct sales to customers through www.autozone.com.
The Company managesevaluates its businessreportable segment primarily on the basis of onenet sales and segment profit, which is defined as gross profit. During the current year, the Company reassessed and revised its reportable segment. See “Note A - Significant Accounting Policies” for a brief description of the Company’s business. As of August 25, 2007, the majority of the Company’s operations were located within the United States. Other operations includesegment to exclude ALLDATA and E-commerce from the Mexico locations, each of which comprises less than 3% of consolidated net sales. newly designated Auto Parts Stores reporting segment. Previously, these immaterial business activities had been combined with Auto Parts Stores.

60


The following data is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information:”table shows segment results for the fiscal years ended:

             
(in thousands) August 29, 2009  August 30, 2008  August 25, 2007 
             
Net Sales
            
Auto Parts Stores $6,671,939  $6,383,697  $6,044,685 
Other  144,885   139,009   125,119 
          
Total $6,816,824  $6,522,706  $6,169,804 
          
Segment Profit
            
Auto Parts Stores $3,296,777  $3,153,703  $2,959,162 
Other  119,672   114,358   105,088 
          
Gross profit  3,416,449   3,268,061   3,064,250 
Operating, selling, general, and administrative  (2,240,387)  (2,143,927)  (2,008,984)
Interest expense, net  (142,316)  (116,745)  (119,116)
          
Income before income taxes $1,033,746  $1,007,389  $936,150 
          
Segment Assets
            
Auto Parts Stores $5,279,454  $5,239,782  $4,791,790 
Other  38,951   17,330   12,919 
          
Total $5,318,405  $5,257,112  $4,804,709 
          
Capital Expenditures
            
Auto Parts Stores $260,448  $238,631  $223,767 
Other  11,799   4,963   707 
          
Total $272,247  $243,594  $224,474 
          
Sales by Product Grouping
            
Failure $2,816,126  $2,707,296  $2,543,620 
Maintenance items  2,655,113   2,462,923   2,311,091 
Discretionary  1,200,700   1,213,478   1,189,974 
          
Auto Parts Stores net sales $6,671,939  $6,383,697  $6,044,685 
          

61


(in thousands) 
 
August 25,
2007
 
August 26,
2006
 
August 27,
2005
 
        
Primary business focus:       
Domestic Retail 
$
5,160,511
 
$
4,989,266
 
$
4,795,648
 
Domestic Commercial  705,567  708,715  718,150 
Other  
303,726
  
250,374
  
197,084
 
Net sales 
$
6,169,804
 
$
5,948,355
 
$
5,710,882
 
55

Quarterly Summary (1)
(unaudited)
(unaudited)
                 
  Twelve  Sixteen 
  Weeks Ended  Weeks Ended 
  November 22,  February 14,  May 9,  August 29, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2008  2009  2009  2009 (2) 
                 
Net sales $1,478,292  $1,447,877  $1,658,160  $2,232,494 
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store sales  (1.5)%  6.0%  7.4%  5.4%
Gross profit  741,191   719,298   832,907   1,123,053 
Operating profit  238,539   214,696   305,232   417,596 
Income before income taxes  207,373   182,789   273,750   369,834 
Net income  131,371   115,864   173,689   236,126 
Basic earnings per share  2.25   2.05   3.18   4.49 
Diluted earnings per share  2.23   2.03   3.13   4.43 

                 
  November 17,  February 9,  May 3,  August 30, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2007  2008  2008  2008 (2) 
                 
Net sales $1,455,655  $1,339,244  $1,517,293  $2,210,514 
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store sales  1.3%  (0.3)%  (0.3)%  0.6%
Gross profit  726,448   667,795   762,006   1,111,812 
Operating profit  237,375   196,885   273,034   416,839 
Income before income taxes  209,313   168,297   247,703   382,075 
Net income  132,516   106,704   158,638   243,747 
Basic earnings per share  2.04   1.69   2.51   3.92 
Diluted earnings per share  2.02   1.67   2.49   3.88 
 
 
 
 
 Twelve Weeks Ended 
 
Sixteen
Weeks Ended 
 
(in thousands, except per  share data) 
 
November 18,
2006
 
February 10,
2007
 
May 5,
2007
 
August 25,
2007
 
          
Net sales $1,393,069 $1,300,357 $1,473,671 $2,002,707 
Increase (decrease) in domestic
comparable store sales
  
0.3
%
 
(0.3
)%
 
0.4
%
 
(0.2
)%
Gross profit  685,295  639,212  735,399  1,004,344 
Operating profit  222,996  188,923  264,977  378,369 
Income before income taxes 
  195,903  162,105  237,862  340,279 
Net income  123,889  103,016  151,591  217,175 
Basic earnings per share 
  1.74  1.46  2.19  3.26 
Diluted earnings per share 
  1.73  1.45  2.17  3.23 
(in thousands, except per share data) 
 
November 19,
2005
 
February 11,
2006
 
May 6,
2006
 
August 26,
2006
 
          
Net sales $1,338,076 $1,253,815 $1,417,433 $1,939,031 
Increase (decrease) in domestic
comparable store sales
  
0.8
%
 
0.4
%
 
2.1
%
 
(0.9
)%
Gross profit  655,529  616,190  704,041  962,761 
Operating profit  205,293  178,345  253,169  373,118 
Income before income taxes 
  181,554  154,012  228,248  338,222 
Net income  114,374  97,022  144,428  213,451 
Basic earnings per share 
  1.49  1.26  1.90  2.94 
Diluted earnings per share 
  1.48  1.25  1.89  2.92 

(1)
(1)The sum of quarterly amounts may not equal the annual amounts reported due to rounding and due to per share amounts being computed independently for each quarter while the full year is based on the annual weighted average shares outstanding.
(2)The fiscal 2009 fourth quarter was based on a 16-week period and the fiscal 2008 fourth quarter was based on a 17-week period. All other quarters presented are based on a 12-week period.

56

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting andFinancial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

As of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of AutoZone’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of August 25, 2007.29, 2009. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During or subsequent to theour fiscal yearfourth quarter ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

62


57


PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information set forth in Part I of this document in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. Additionally, the information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 22, 2007,26, 2009, in the sections entitled “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives that applies to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. The Company has filed a copy of this Code of Ethical Conduct as Exhibit 14.1 to this Form 10-K. The Company has also made the Code of Ethical Conduct available on its investor relations website at http://www.autozoneinc.com.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 22, 2007,26, 2009, in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 22, 2007,26, 2009, in the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Management” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Not applicable.

Item 14. Principal AccountantAccounting Fees and Services

The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 22, 2007,26, 2009, in the section entitled “Proposal 2 - Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

63



58


PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report

(a) Financial Statements

The following financial statements, related notes and reports of independent registered public accounting firm are filed with this Annual Report in Part II, Item 8:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting  31
  
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  32
  
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, August 26, 2006,
30, 2008, and August 27, 2005
25, 2007
  33
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and August 26, 200630, 2008  34
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, August 26, 2006,
30, 2008, and August 27, 2005
25, 2007
  35
   
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the fiscal years ended August 25, 2007,29, 2009, August 26, 2006,
30, 2008, and August 27, 2005
25, 2007
  36
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  37

(b)Exhibits

The Exhibit Index following this document’s signature pages is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

(c) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedules are omitted because the information is not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

64


59


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
   
 AUTOZONE, INC.
 


By:  /s/ William C. Rhodes, III
 
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: October 22, 2007

26, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

SIGNATURE
 
TITLE
SIGNATURETITLEDATE
     
/s/ William C. Rhodes, III
William C. Rhodes, III
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 22, 2007
William C. Rhodes, III
(Principal Executive Officer)
 October 26, 2009
     
/s/ William T. Giles
William T. Giles
 Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President,October 22, 2007
William T. GilesFinance, Information Technology and Store Development

(Principal Financial Officer)
 October 26, 2009
     
/s/ Charlie Pleas, III
Charlie Pleas, III
 Senior Vice President, ControllerOctober 22, 2007
Charlie Pleas, III(Principal
 (Principal Accounting Officer)
 October 26, 2009
     
/s/ Charles M. ElsonWilliam C. Crowley
William C. Crowley
 Director October 22, 2007
Charles M. Elson26, 2009
     
/s/ Sue E. Gove
Sue E. Gove
 Director October 22, 2007
Sue E. Gove26, 2009
     
/s/ Earl G. Graves, Jr.
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
Earl G. Graves, Jr.    
     
/s/ N. Gerry HouseRobert R. Grusky
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
N. Gerry HouseRobert R. Grusky    
     
/s/ J.R. Hyde, III
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
J.R. Hyde, III    
     
/s/ W. Andrew McKenna
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
W. Andrew McKenna    
     
/s/ George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.    
     
/s/ Luis P. Nieto
Director October 26, 2009
Luis P. Nieto
/s/ Theodore W. Ullyot
 Director October 22, 200726, 2009
Theodore W. Ullyot    

65


60

EXHIBIT INDEX

3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 13, 1999.
   
3.2 Fourth Amended and Restated By-laws of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007.
   
4.1 Senior Indenture, dated as of July 22, 1998, between AutoZone, Inc. and the First National Bank of Chicago. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 17, 1998.
   
4.2 Fourth Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007.
   
4.3 Indenture dated as of August 8, 2003, between AutoZone, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-3 (No. 333-107828) filed August 11, 2003.
   
4.4Terms Agreement dated October 16, 2002, by and among AutoZone, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated October 18, 2002.
4.5Form of 5.875% Note due 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated October 18, 2002.
4.6Terms Agreement dated May 29, 2003, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated May 29, 2003.
4.7Form of 4.375% Note due 2013. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated May 29, 2003.
4.8Terms Agreement dated November 3, 2003, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.9Form of 4.75% Note due 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.10Form of 5.50% Note due 2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.11Terms Agreement dated June 8, 2006, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated June 13, 2006.
4.12Form of 6.95% Senior Note due 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated June 13, 2006.
4.13Officers’ Certificate dated August 4, 2008, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 6.500% Senior Notes due 2014. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008.
4.14Form of 6.500% Senior Note due 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008
4.15Officers’ Certificate dated August 4, 2008, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008.

66


4.16Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2018. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008
4.17Officers’ Certificate dated July 2, 2009, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 5.750% Notes due 2015. Incorporated by reference to 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 2, 2009.
4.18Form of 5.750% Senior Note due 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated July 2, 2009
*10.1 Fourth Amended and Restated Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 4, 2002.
   
*10.2 Second Amended and Restated 1998 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000.
   
*10.3 Third Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
   
*10.4 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2002.
   
*10.5 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2002.
   
*10.6AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 12, 2000.
  
*10.710.6 Form of Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and various executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 22, 1999.

*10.8Form of Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc., and various officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 18, 2000.
*10.9 AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 12, 2002.
   
*10.1010.7 AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 12, 2002.
   
*10.1110.8 Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 15, 2003.
   
*10.12Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between Steve Odland and AutoZone, Inc., dated October 23, 2003. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 22, 2003.
  
10.13*10.9 Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 17, 2004, among AutoZone, Inc., as borrower, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, and Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent and Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 8, 2004.
61

10.14 AutoZone, Inc. 2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2004, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held December 16, 2004.
   
10.1510.10 Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004,July 9, 2009, among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, theThe Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Joint Lead ArrangerFrom Time To Time Party Hereto, and Sole Book Manager, Banc of America Securities LLC as Joint Lead Arranger, and Calyon New York Branch, BNP Paribas and Regions Bank as Co-Documentation Agents. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 23, 2004 (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2004).
10.16Lenders’ consent to extend the termination date of the Company’s Amended and Restated 5-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 17, 2004 for an additional period of one year, to May 17, 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 7, 2005.
10.17Lenders’ consent to extend the termination date of the Company’s Amended and Restated 364-Day Credit agreement dated as of May 17, 2004 for an additional period of 364 days, to May 15, 2006. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 7, 2005.
*10.18Description of severance agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and William C. Rhodes, III. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005, and the Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007.
10.19Agreement dated as of October 19, 2005, between AutoZone, Inc. and Michael E. Longo. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.
10.20Offer letter dated April 13, 2006, to William T. Giles. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.
10.21First Amendment dated as of May 5, 2006, to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004, among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.
10.22Second Amendment dated as of August 3, 2007, to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004, (as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006) among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent.
10.23Four-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006, among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Citicorp USA, Inc.Swingline Lender, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.Agent, and Banc of America Securities, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, as Joint Lead Arrangers, and Banc of America Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Joint Book Runners, and Suntrust Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, and US Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents.
   
10.24Second Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006, among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Swingline Lender, and Citicorp USA, Inc. as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.
  
10.25*10.11 AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 25, 2006, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 13, 2006.
   
10.26*10.12 Form of Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007.
   
10.27*10.13 AutoZone, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the definitive proxy statement dated October 25, 2006, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 13, 2006.
62

10.28 
Agreement dated January 19, 2007, between
*10.14AutoZone, Inc. and Bradley W. Bacon.Director Compensation Program. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated January 19, 2007.February 15, 2008.

67


   
10.29*10.15 Offer letterAmended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K dated March 19, 2007,January 4, 2008.
*10.16Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008.
*10.17AutoZone, Inc. Enhanced Severance Pay Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
*10.18Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement signed by each of the following executive officers: Jon A. Bascom, Timothy W. Briggs, Mark A. Finestone, William T. Giles, William W. Graves, Lisa R. Kranc, Thomas B. Newbern, Charlie Pleas III, Larry Roesel.M. Roesel and James A. Shea; and by AutoZone, Inc., with an effective date of February 14, 2008, for each. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
*10.19Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement approved by AutoZone’s Compensation Committee for execution by non-executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
*10.20Agreement dated February 14, 2008, between AutoZone, Inc. and William C. Rhodes, III. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
*10.21Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement signed by each of the following officers: Rebecca W. Ballou, Dan Barzel, Craig Blackwell, Brian L. Campbell, Philip B. Daniele, III, Robert A. Durkin, Bill Edwards, Wm. David Gilmore, Stephany L. Goodnight, David Goudge, James C. Griffith, William R. Hackney, Rodney Halsell, Diana H. Hull, Jeffery Lagges, Grantland E. McGee, Jr., Mitchell Major, Ann A. Morgan, J. Scott Murphy, Jeffrey H. Nix, Raymond A. Pohlman, Elizabeth Rabun, Juan A. Santiago, Joe L. Sellers, Jr., Brett Shanaman and Solomon Woldeslassie. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2007.3, 2008.
   
10.22Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2008 between AutoZone, Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated June 26, 2008.
*10.23Second Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and Harry L. Goldsmith dated December 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated December 30, 2008.
*10.24Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and Robert D. Olsen dated December 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K dated December 30, 2008.
12.1 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

14.1 Code of Ethical Conduct. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
   
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
   
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
   
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

68

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

63