UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x    Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934        

For the fiscal year ended: September 30, 2009

¨    Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission File No. 001-32898

China BAK Battery, Inc.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Mark One)
Nevada
88-0442833
x
Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended: September 30, 2007
o
Transition Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ______ to_______

Commission file number: 001-32898


China BAK Battery, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
88-0442833
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
No.)

BAK Industrial Park

BAK Industrial Park
No. 1 BAK Street
Kuichong Town, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518119
People’s Republic of China
(86-755) 8977-0093
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

No. 1 BAK Street
Kuichong Town, Longgang District
Shenzhen 518119
People’s Republic of China
(86-755) 8977-0093
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.001 per shareThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(NASDAQ Global MarketMarket)

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ¨o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ¨o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the pastpreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x                 No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨No ¨o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨o



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filero
¨
Accelerated Filerx
x
Non-Accelerated Filero(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes ¨o No x

The aggregate market value of the 48,893,39657,683,981 shares of voting and non-voting common equity stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $158.9 million$65.57million as of March 30, 2007,31, 2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the last sale price of the registrant’s common stock on such date of $3.25$1.71 per share, as reported byon The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.


Global Market..

There were a total of 52,954,60363,601,276 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of December 10, 2007.


11, 2009.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:


None

CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC.
FORM 10-K
For

Portions of the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007

registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Number
PART I
 
Page
PART I
62
   
ITEM 1.BUSINESS.2
Item 1.ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS.Business24
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
6
47
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES47
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS49
ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.51
   
Item 1A.PART II Risk Factors
24
51
   
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.51
Item 1B.ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATAUnresolved Staff Comments52
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
44
55
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.83
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.83
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE84
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES84
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION.88
   
Item 2.PART III Properties
44
89
   
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE89
Item 3.ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONLegal Proceedings89
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
45
89
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.89
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES89
   
Item 4.PART IV Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
46
89
   
PART II
47
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
47
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
49
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
51
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
70
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
70
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
71
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures
72
Item 9B.Other Information
75
PART III
76
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
76
Item 11.Executive Compensation
79
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
87
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
90
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services
91
PART IV
91
ItemITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
91
 Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
96
89


Introductory Comment—Terminology


Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or this Report, the terms “we,” “us” or “our” refers“us,” “our,” “China BAK,” and the “Company” refer to China BAK Battery, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis; “BAK International” refers to our Hong Kong subsidiary, BAK International Ltd.;Limited; “BAK Tianjin” refers to our PRC subsidiary, BAK International (Tianjin) Ltd;Ltd.; “Shenzhen BAK” refers to our PRC subsidiary, Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; “BAK Electronics” refers to our PRC subsidiary, BAK Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; ���BAK“BAK Canada” refers to our Canadian subsidiary, BAK Battery Canada Ltd.; “BAK Europe” refers to our German subsidiary, BAK Europe GmbH; “BAK India” refers to our Indian subsidiary, BAK Telecom India Private Limited; “China” or “PRC” refers to the People’s Republic of China, excluding for the purposes of this Report only, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau; “RMB” or “Renminbi” refers to the legal currency of China; and “$” or “U.S. dollars” refers to the legal currency of the United States of America.


Introductory Comment—Forward-Looking Statements


Statements contained in this Report include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of such term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual financial or operating results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be realized. Forward-looking statements made in this Report generally are based on our best estimates of future results, performances or achievements, predicated upon current conditions and the most recent results of the companies involved and their respective industries. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among other things, such factors as:


our anticipated growth strategies and our ability to manage the expansion of our business operations effectively;
our future business development, results of operations and financial condition;
our ability to fund our operations and manage our substantial short-term indebtedness;
our ability to maintain or increase our market share in the competitive markets in which we do business;
our limited operating history in developing, manufacturing and selling of lithium-based rechargeable battery cells;
our ability to keep up with rapidly changing technologies and evolving industry standards, including our ability to achieve technological advances;
our dependence on the growth in demand for the portable electronic devices that are powered by our products;
our ability to diversify our product offering and capture new market opportunities;
our ability to obtain OEM qualifications from brand names;
our ability to source our needs for skilled labor, machinery and raw materials economically;
our ability to secure raw materials in the future and to manage the costs of raw materials or to secure alternative or substitute raw materials;
uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal and regulatory environment;
our ability to remediate any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;
our ability to maintain cost leadership; and

  • our anticipated growth strategies and our ability to manage the expansion of our business operations effectively;

  • our future business development, results of operations and financial condition;

  • our ability to fund our operations and manage our substantial short-term indebtedness;

  • our ability to maintain or increase our market share in the competitive markets in which we do business;

  • our limited operating history in developing, manufacturing and selling of lithium-based rechargeable battery cells;

  • our ability to keep up with rapidly changing technologies and evolving industry standards, including our ability to achieve technological advances;

  • our dependence on the growth in demand for the portable electronic devices that are powered by our products;

  • our ability to diversify our product offering and capture new market opportunities;

  • our ability to obtain original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) qualifications from brand names;

  • our ability to source our needs for skilled labor, machinery and raw materials economically;

  • our ability to secure raw materials in the future and to manage the costs of raw materials or to secure alternative or substitute raw materials;

F-1


our ability to acquire land use rights to our facilities.

  • uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal and regulatory environment;

  • our ability to remediate any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting;

  • our ability to maintain cost leadership;

  • our ability to obtain property ownership rights to our facilities;

  • other risks identified in this Report and in our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Additional disclosures regarding factors that could cause our results and performance to differ from results or performance anticipated by this Report are discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Report and our other filings with the SEC. These reports attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects. The forward-looking statements made in this Report speak only as of the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation to provide updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our expectations or future events.


We file annual, quarterly and other reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may obtain and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference facilities by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC at its principal office at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-1004. The SEC maintains an Internet website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Our SEC filings, including exhibits filed therewith, are accessible through the Internet at that website.


You may also request a copy of our SEC filings, at no cost to you, by writing or telephoning us at: BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street, Kuichong Town, Longgang District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China, attention Corporate Secretary, telephone 011 (86-755) 8977-0093. We will not send exhibits to the documents, unless the exhibits are specifically requested and you pay our fee for duplication and delivery.


PART I

Item

ITEM 1.         Business.


BUSINESS.

Overview


We are one of the largest manufacturers of rechargeable lithium-based battery cells in the world, as measured by production output. We produce battery cells that are the principal component of rechargeable batteries commonly used to power the following applications:


cellular phones—customer segments include original equipment manufacturing, or OEM, customers and replacement battery manufacturers;
notebook computers;
portable consumer electronics, such as digital cameras, portable media players, portable gaming devices
and personal digital assistants, or PDAs; and
cordless power tools and other applications, such as miner’s lamps, electric bicycles and hybrid electric vehicles.

2


Our products are packed into batteries by third-party battery pack manufacturers in accordance with the specifications of manufacturers of portable electronic applications. We believe that our proprietary technologies allow us to offer battery cells that are flexibly configured, lightweight, powerful and safe. We conduct all of our operations in China, in close proximity to China’s electronics manufacturing base and its rapidly growing market. Our access to China’s supply of low-cost skilled labor, raw materials, machinery and facilities enables us to price our products competitively in an increasingly price-sensitive market. In addition, we have automated key stages of our manufacturing process to be able to produce high-quality battery cells that consistently meet the stringent requirements of our customers.


Historically, we have primarily manufactured prismatic lithium-ion cells for the cellular phone replacement battery market and OEM market. Our prismatic cells are targeted at the PRC replacement market, where cellular phone batteries produced by independent battery manufacturers are purchased for use in second-hand cellular phones or as back-up batteries, and are primarily comprised of steel-case cells.batteries. We also operate in the cellular phone battery OEM market, where we sell aluminum-steelbattery cells for incorporation into branded batteries that are included in new cellular phones or are sold as replacement batteries. We have successfully established ourselves as a major competitor in the PRC domestic OEM market and leading brand names such as Lenovo, Ningbo Bird,ZTE, Gionee, Wingtech, Foxconn, Konka and Haier have designated us as aan approved cell provider to approved battery pack manufacturers for their branded batteries. At the request of customers that order prismatic battery packs, we also engage pack battery manufacturers to assemble our prismatic cells into batteries for a fee and then sell battery packs to these customers both for the replacement and OEM markets. We intend to leverage the strong technological capabilities we have developed over the years to continue our growth and expand our reach to the global cellular phone OEM market, and have been actively pursuing OEM qualifications from international brand names, such as Nokia, Sony Ericsson, LG and Motorola.


Samsung.

At the request of customers that order prismatic battery packs, we also engage battery pack manufacturers to assemble our prismatic cells into batteries for a fee and then sell battery packs to these customers for the replacement and OEM markets. OEMs also purchase our battery cells from battery pack manufacturers. We expect that sales of prismatic battery packs in such a manner will represent a decreasing percentage of our revenues going forward.

To meet the growing demand for our products and to capture new opportunities, we have expanded our product offerings by addingoffer the following three new product lines:


Lithium polymer cells for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets, digital medial players and digital audio players. We began commercial production of lithium polymer cells in September 2005.
Cylindrical lithium-ion cells for use in notebook computers. We began commercial production of cylindrical cells for notebook computers in June 2006 using our new semi-automated production lines. In March 2007, our cylindrical lithium-ion cells met the safety standards for use in mining lamps set by the Quality Supervision and Testing Center of the Chemical and Physical Power Sources of the Ministry of Information Industry. In August 2007, we signed a non-binding letter of intent with Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) (NYSE: HPQ), under which both parties have undertaken to work together in a set timeframe to reach a definitive agreement for us to supply cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells to HP or HP’s designated battery pack manufacturers for notebook computer batteries to be used in notebook computers manufactured by HP.
6

  • Cylindrical lithium-ion cellsfor use in notebook computers. We began commercial production of cylindrical cells for notebook computers in June 2006 using our new automated production line. We increased our manufacturing capacity in line with advancements in our manufacturing technology and increases in customer demand. Leading brand names such as ASUS and Hasee Computer Co., Ltd., or Hasee, have designated us as an approved cell provider for their branded batteries. As of September 30, 2009, a first-tier international OEM notebook computer manufacturer determined that our cylindrical lithium-ion cells met their stringent performance and reliability requirements, and accepted us into its approved vendor list. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, we initiated shipments of cylindrical cells to this OEM notebook manufacturer. Such shipments, while initially small, are expected to promote our penetration into the Notebook OEM market when North America begins its economic recovery. We have also been actively pursuing other tier-one OEM qualifications from international brand names, such as Dell and Lenovo.

  • High-power lithium-phosphate cellsfor use in cordless power tools, uninterruptible power supplies, mining lamps, electric bicycles, light electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and other applications. We began commercial production of lithium-phosphate cells at our Shenzhen facility for use in cordless power tools in October 2005, and for mining lamps in March 2007, at which point our lithium-phosphate cells passed certain related governmental safety tests. In December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin, was incorporated to focus on the R&D, manufacturing and distribution of lithium-phosphate cells. We have since shifted all lithium-phosphate cells manufacturing machinery, equipment and personnel from our Shenzhen facility to our Tianjin facility. In October 2008, our Tianjin facility completed construction of its first lithium-phosphate cells production line, and initiated trial production of lithium-phosphate cells. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

3


High-power, lithium-phosphate cells for use in cordless power tools and other applications. We began commercial production of lithium-phosphate cells in October 2005 for use in cordless power tools. Currently, we are actively seeking new market opportunities for our lithium-phosphate cells, such as miner’s lamps, electric bicycles and hybrid electric vehicles.

  • Lithium polymer cells, historically for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, PDAs, Bluetooth headsets, digital media players, and digital audio players. We began commercial production of lithium polymer cells in September 2005. We have recently expanded the applications of our lithium polymer cells to notebook computers. During fiscal year 2009, we received orders from notebook computer battery OEM manufacturer STL Technology Co., Ltd. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

Our operations have grown since our inception in August 2001. We generated revenues of $101.9$145.9 million, $143.8$245.3 million, and $145.9$211.1 million in the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007,2009, respectively, and net income of $13.5 million, $20.2$483,000 and net loss of $7.9 million and $483,000$14.0 million during the same periods, respectively.


Our Industry


The lithium-ion battery was first introduced by Sony Corporation in 1992 and has since become the battery of choice for a wide range of portable consumer electronic applications because of its high energy density, high voltage, compact size, light weight and excellent energy retention characteristics. The advantages of the lithium-based battery over the traditional nickel cadmium and nickel metal hydride batteries have resulted in a significant increase of its share in the global rechargeable battery market. Demand for lithium-based batteries grows in tandem with consumer electronics products powered by lithium-based batteries, such as cellular phones, notebook computers and other portable electronic devices. In addition, as a result of technological advancements in recent years, the lithium-based battery is being used in increasingly more powerful and diverse applications. Lithium-based batteries are now being used in emerging industrial applications such as cordless power tools, miner’smining lamps, hybrid electric bicycles,vehicles, and hybridlight electric vehicles. The lithium-based battery market is dominated by manufacturers located in Japan, South Korea and China. China’s battery industry continues to grow and capture market share in the global battery manufacturing industry as both domestic and international battery manufacturers increase their manufacturing presence in the PRC. China has a number of key advantages in battery manufacturing that are expected to continue to drive this growth, including low costs, proximity to the consumer electronics supply chain, proximity to end-users and a developing R&D infrastructure. Chinese manufacturers are becoming increasingly competitive as they have significantly benefited and will continue to benefit from these advantages.


Rechargeable Batteries—Introduction


A battery is a portable electrochemical system that releases stored electrical energy. The battery industry has experienced significant growth in recent years as a result of increased global demand for portable electronic applications. The higher power requirements and small size of these devices have also driven steady progress in battery technology.


The battery industry can be broadly divided into non-rechargeable (or primary) and rechargeable (or secondary) segments. Rechargeable batteries have increased their share of the overall battery market as they have become more cost and time efficient for use over sustained periods. They also help address environmental concerns over disposal of non-rechargeable batteries.


The four mainstream chemistries currently used in rechargeable batteries for portable electronics are nickel cadmium, nickel metal hydride, lithium-ion, and lithium polymer. The characteristics of each of these battery types are as follows:

  
Nickel Cadmium
 
Nickel Metal
Hydride
 
Lithium-Ion
 
Lithium Polymer
Commercial introduction 1899 1990 1992 1999
         
Energy Density Low Medium High High
         
Max Voltage Per Cell 1.2 1.2 3.6 3.6
         
Memory Effect Yes Minimal No No
         
Environmental Impact High Low Low Low
         
Core Application Usage 
Toys
Lights
Power tools
Cordless phones
 
Hybrid vehicles
Power tools
 
Cellular phones
Portable consumer
electronics (1) 
Notebook
Computers
Power tools
 
Small scale portable
electronics (2)
 Headsets

  Nickel  Nickel Metal     Lithium 
  Cadmium  Hydride   Lithium-Ion  Polymer 
Commercial introduction 1899  1990  1992  1999 
Energy Density Low  Medium  High  High 
Max Voltage Per Cell 1.2  1.2  3.6  3.6 

4



Memory EffectYesMinimalNoNo
Environmental ImpactHighLowLowLow
Core Application UsageToysHybridCellular phonesSmall scale
LightsvehiclesPortableportable
Power toolsPower toolsconsumerelectronics(2)
Cordlesselectronics(1) Portable consumer electronics include portable media players and portable gaming devices.Headsets
phonesNotebook
Computers
Power tools
Mining lamps
Electric
bicycles
Light electric
vehicles
Uninterruptible
power supplies
7

(2) Small scale portable consumer electronics include portable audio players and PDAs.

----------------------------------

(1) Portable consumer electronics include portable media players and portable gaming devices.
(2) Small-scale portable consumer electronics include portable audio players and PDAs.

Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries


Lithium in its metal form has long been known to be a highly attractive battery material due to its light weight and high electromagnetic potential. However, as a result of chemical instability, lithium metal batteries have not been commercially developed. Instead, various lithium-based compounds have been introduced. As portable electronic devices integrate enhanced multi-media features while remaining compact and light-weight, they require improved battery performance at reduced size and weight. Rechargeable lithium-based battery cells, compared to rechargeable battery cells based on nickel cadmium or nickel metal hydride chemistries, have a higher energy density, meaning a greater energy capacity relative to a given battery cell’s weight and size. Furthermore, lithium-based battery cells are able to generate approximately three times the voltage of nickel-based cells, thereby reducing the number of cells needed in a battery pack, leading to a reduction in the weight and size of the pack. These characteristics will enable a portable electronic device to integrate more features and operate for a longer time while remaining slim and light, increasing its portability. Lithium-based battery cells also have other favorable characteristics such as no memory effect and a slow loss of charge when not in use. Key sub-categories of lithium-based batteries include:


Lithium-ion.  Although slightly lower in energy density than lithium metal, lithium-ion is safe and maintains many of the attractive chemical characteristics of lithium. The lithium-ion battery was first developed by Sony Corporation in 1992. Our latest development efforts have been to look at new lithium compounds. Lithium phosphate is a promising example which has recently been put into commercial usage within the cordless power tool market. A lithium-ion battery cell consists of a lithium cobalt positive electrode, a graphite negative electrode, an electrolyte, lithium salt and separators. Both electrodes have a layered structure. When charging, lithium-ions come out from the positive electrode and move to the negative electrode through electrolytes deposited between the layers of the graphite negative electrode. When discharging, the reaction process is reversed.
Lithium Polymer.  First introduced in 1999, Lithium polymer has similar performance to lithium-ion but uses a polymer gel as the electrolyte. This enables a more flexible and smaller form factor, although at higher unit cost. Lithium polymer battery cells share many characteristics of lithium-ion battery cells and provide similar performance. Since lithium polymer cells can be made in a thin and pouch-like case, thereby eliminating the need for a metal container, they offer further reduction in weight and size, as well as, more importantly, flexibility for design and physical configuration. These distinct characteristics have made lithium polymer cells suitable for ultra-thin portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets and PDAs.
8

  • Lithium-ion. Although slightly lower in energy density than lithium metal, lithium-ion is safe and maintains many of the attractive chemical characteristics of lithium. The lithium-ion battery was first developed by Sony Corporation in 1992. Our latest development efforts have been to look at new lithium compounds. Lithium phosphate is a promising example which has recently been put into commercial usage within the cordless power tool market. A lithium-ion battery cell consists of a lithium cobalt positive electrode, a graphite negative electrode, an electrolyte, lithium salt and separators. Both electrodes have a layered structure. When charging, lithium-ions come out from the positive electrode and move to the negative electrode through electrolytes deposited between the layers of the graphite negative electrode. When discharging, the reaction process is reversed.

  • Lithium Polymer. First introduced in 1999, lithium polymer has similar performance to lithium-ion but uses a polymer gel as the electrolyte. This enables a more flexible and smaller form factor, although at higher unit cost. Lithium polymer battery cells share many characteristics of lithium-ion battery cells and provide similar performance. Since lithium polymer cells can be made in a thin and pouch-like case, thereby eliminating the need for a metal container, they offer further reduction in weight and size, as well as, more importantly, flexibility for design and physical configuration. These distinct characteristics have made lithium polymer cells suitable for ultra-thin portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets and PDAs.

5


Due to their high energy density and capacity, high voltage, compact size, light weight, lack of memory effect and excellent energy retention characteristics, use of lithium-based batteries has risen significantly in portable electronic products. As the cost/power ratio of lithium-based batteries continues to improve, it is expected that its usage will also extend into other applications.


Key Rechargeable Battery Applications


End-product applications which are driving the demand for rechargeable lithium-based batteries include cellular phones, notebook computers, portable consumer electronics, and cordless power tools.


tools, mining lamps, uninterruptible power supplies, and electric bicycles. We also expect interest in light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles to increase demand for rechargeable lithium-based batteries substantially.

Cellular phones


Cellular phone battery cells currently use a mixture of nickel metal hydride, lithium-ion and lithium polymer. The trend in newer models is towards lithium-based batteries as they allow for a smaller and more flexible form and longer battery life.


Demand for batteries for cellular phones is driven by two factors. The first is the sales of new cellular phones. An OEM of cellular phones includes a battery with a new cellular phone. There is also a replacement market for cellular phone batteries. Demand in the replacement market is in turn driven by a number of factors. Often a consumer will purchase a second battery to carry as a spare. In addition, lithium-ion batteries have a finite life, so over time consumers will need to purchase a battery to replace the failed battery in their phone. As the number of active cellular phone subscribers increases, the number of replacement batteries sold increases. A market characteristic unique to the Chinese cellular phone market is that cell phones are often sold and resold during their useful life. Over time these cell phones require a replacement battery. Our customers for cellular phone battery cells fall into two segments:


OEM: The OEMs manufacture mobile phone handsets. They purchase batteries to support their production of new cellular phones. They also purchase batteries to serve the replacement market which they sell under their own brand name.
Independent Battery Manufacturers: These third-party manufacturers compete against the OEM for a share of the replacement market. They typically sell their products under their own brand name or a private label.

  • OEM: The OEMs manufacture mobile phone handsets. They purchase batteries to support their production of new cellular phones. They also purchase batteries to serve the replacement market which they sell under their own brand name. OEMs do not purchase these battery cells directly from us; they purchase them from battery pack manufacturers that have packaged them according to the OEMs’ specifications.

  • Independent Battery Manufacturers: These third-party manufacturers compete against the OEMs for a share of the replacement market. They typically sell their products under their own brand name or a private label.

Notebook computers


Notebook computer sales are forecast to grow further in coming years due to increasingly mobile workforces and the improved power and functionality of notebook computers. Due to their substantial power requirements and larger size relative to other portable electronic devices, notebook computers have in the past typically utilized nickel metal hydride batteries. However, over the last ten years, lithium-based batteries have almost completely replaced nickel metal hydride batteries due to the increasing power of lithium-based batteries and demand for smaller lighter notebook computers. We believe that we are the largest notebook computer battery cell manufacturer in China and that there currently are no other significant Chinese manufacturers in the notebook computer battery market.


Power tools


Power tools such as drills, saws and grinders are used for both commercial and personal use. Due to high power requirements, many power tools have historically used small combustion engines, used heavier nickel metal hydride batteries or relied on external power sources. Manufacturers of power tools, such as Milwaukee, Black & Decker, Bosch, Metabo and Rigid have begun to use lithium-ion technology. The DeWalt division of Black & Decker began marketing a power tool product line that uses nano lithium phosphatelithium-phosphate technology in its batteries. This technology has resulted in increased the power of thethese batteries to 36 volts. The market for portable high-powered power tools is rapidly growing and has prompted many users, both commercial and personal, to replace or upgrade their current power tools.


6


Portable Consumer Electronics


consumer electronics

This category includes digital audio players (such as MP3MP3/MP4 players), digital still cameras, digital video cameras, portable DVD players, PDAs, BlackBerry devices, portable gaming systems and Bluetooth devices. There is a rapid trend to use lithium-based batteries in portable consumer electronics (both rechargeable and non-rechargeable) due to a desire for smaller, longer-lasting devices.

9

Light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles

Due to such recent trends as renewed concerns relating to the availability and price of oil, increased legal fuel-efficiency requirements and incentives, and heightened interest in environmentally-friendly or “green” technologies, light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles are likely to continue to attract substantial interest from vehicle manufacturers and consumers. Light electric vehicles include bicycles, scooters, and motorcycles, with rechargeable electric motors. Due to their relatively small size and light design, approximately 24-150 lithium-phosphate cells can be used to power light electric vehicles. Hybrid electric vehicles include automobiles, trucks, buses, and other vehicles that combine a conventional propulsion system with a rechargeable energy storage system to achieve better fuel economy than conventional vehicles. As these vehicles tend to be large and heavy, their rechargeable energy storage system generally consists of a large quantity of rechargeable lithium-phosphate cells.

Uninterruptible power supplies

An uninterruptible power supply (UPS), provides emergency power from a separate source when utility power is not available. The most common type of battery used in uninterruptible power supplies is Sealed Lead-Acid, however, due to the lithium battery’s relatively small size, light design and environmentally-friendly features, the demand for lithium batteries in this industry is increasing.

Battery Manufacturing in China


China’s battery industry has historically focused on lower-end batteries, with Japan and Korea providing the technical innovation and producing higher-end and rechargeable batteries. However, we believe that as the Chinese government continues to support battery makers in terms of financial backing and research, China’s R&D and manufacturing capabilities will become more developed.


China’s market share of the full breadth of battery production is expected to increase. China has a number of benefits in battery manufacturing which are expected to drive this growth:


Low costs.  Relative to Japan and Korea, China has significantly lower cost of labor as well as easy access to bulk raw materials and land
Proximity to electronics supply chain.  Electronics manufacturing in general continues to shift to China, giving China-based manufacturers a further cost and cycle time advantage
Proximity to end-markets.  China’s domestic market for portable applications such as cellular phones and portable audio-visual equipment continues to grow rapidly. Proximity to end-market further consolidates the cost and cycle time advantages for China manufacturers.
Developing R&D infrastructure.  China has focused in recent years on building its research, development and engineering skill base in all aspects of higher-end manufacturing, including batteries. For example, lithium-ion and lithium polymer batteries are both part of China’s tenth five-year development plan which allocates state resources to provide financial assistance to companies engaged in the business of developing and manufacturing batteries, to fund the research and development of new battery material and to assist patent applications and the protection of intellectual property.

  • Low costs. Relative to Japan and Korea, China has a significantly lower cost of labor as well as easy access to bulk raw materials and land

  • Proximity to electronics supply chain. Electronics manufacturing in general continues to shift to China, giving China-based manufacturers a further cost and cycle time advantage

  • Proximity to end-markets. China’s domestic market for portable applications such as cellular phones and portable audio-visual equipment continues to grow rapidly. Proximity to end-market further consolidates the cost and cycle time advantages for China manufacturers.

  • Developing R&D infrastructure. China has focused in recent years on building its research, development and engineering skill base in all aspects of higher-end manufacturing, including batteries. For example, lithium-ion and lithium polymer batteries are both part of China’s tenth five-year development plan which allocates state resources to provide financial assistance to companies engaged in the business of developing and manufacturing batteries, to fund the research and development of new battery material and to assist patent applications and the protection of intellectual property.

7


Our Competitive Strengths


We believe that the following competitive strengths enable us to compete effectively in, and to capitalize on the growth of, the global lithium-ion battery market:


Strong focus on lithium-based batteries and core competency in lithium-ion battery technology


Since our inception in August 2001, we have focused on the research, development and manufacture of lithium-based battery cells. Through this experience, we have been exposed to a rapidly growing market and have developed a core competency in lithium-ion battery technology that we believe enables us to enhance our product quality, reduce cost and keep up with evolving industry standards. Our cells are used in branded cellular phone batteries of companies such as Lenovo, ZTE, Gionee and Haier,a testament to our competency in core technologies. Although our production to date has been largely for cellular phone prismatic batteries, we have also been able to develop other lithium-based battery cells, such as lithium-ion cylindrical cells, lithium-phosphate cells and lithium polymer cells, to capture new market opportunities, such as those for notebook computers and cordless power tools. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we had 195344 patents registered in the PRC relating to battery cell materials, design and manufacturing process, and also had 305573 pending patent applications filed in the PRC and 20109 in other countries.


Strong R&D capabilities


We place a strong emphasis on R&D, particularly on technological innovation and the development of new battery cell materials and products. We have established a dedicated R&D center with what we believe to be the most advanced equipment in China. Our R&D team consists of 240 researchers200researchers and scientists, led by Dr. Huanyu Mao, our chief operating officer and chief technology officer, who has pioneered, and is a veteran of, the lithium-ion industry since its commercialization in 1992. Dr. Mao was the inventor under seven U.S. patents related to lithium-ion technology. In December 2006, we also established a wholly-owned subsidiary, BAK Canada, to focus on the research and development of lithium-ion batteries, which comprises a group of experts led by Mr. Kenneth G. Broom, our vice president of International OEM Business,chief operating officer, who brings 2325 years’ li-ion battery industry working experience.

10

As an example of our R&D efforts in battery cell materials, we have successfully developed the technology to use substitute materials to reduce the amount of lithium cobalt dioxide used in the manufacture of lithium-based cells. Lithium cobalt dioxide is the most expensive ingredient currently required to make lithium-based cells because cobalt is not renewable.

Economies of scale


We are one of the largest manufacturers of lithium-ion battery cells in the world, as measured by production output. As of September 30, 2007,2009 our production capacity reached approximately 2730 million units of battery cells per month. We believe our economies of scale have made us a preferred customer for our suppliers, enabling us to compete effectively in an increasingly price-sensitive market through (i) a higher bargaining power to secure a supply of materials and equipment at a lower cost, and (ii) a larger base for spreading out our fixed-cost allocation.


fixed-costs.

China-based, low-cost manufacturing model


We conduct all of our manufacturing activities in Shenzhen, China. Our access to China’s abundant supply of skilled and low-cost labor, as well as our ability to source raw materials, equipment, land and manufacturing facilities locally and economically, has considerably lowered our operating cost and expenses as a percentage of revenues. Because our products are not subject to any customs duty as compared to those imported from our Japanese and Korean competitors, we believe we enjoy a cost advantage in the domestic market for customers in China’s electronics manufacturing base.


Optimal use of automation in production process


We selectively use automation in our manufacturing process to ensure high uniformity and precision in our products while maintaining our cost-competitive advantage. As a fully automated production line is very expensive, we tailor our semi-automated solution based on stages of the manufacturing process and product attributes. We use automated machinery in key stages of the manufacturing process while using manual labor for other stages to take advantage of the availability of low-cost, skilled labor in China. We believe this considerably reduces our capital expenditure requirements. For example, we use automated machinery in manufacturing our cylindrical battery cells because cylindrical battery cells designed for use in notebook computers require higher uniformity and precision that only can be achieved by use of automation.


8


Experienced management team with proven technology and operational record


We have an experienced management team. Mr. Xiangqian Li, our president and chief executive officer and the chairman of our board of directors, has extensive experience in the battery industry. Mr. Li has been instrumental in helping us achieve our current market position. Kenneth G. Broom, our Chief Operating Officer has more than 20 years of management, engineering and sales experience in the Li-ion battery industry. Tony Shen, our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, has extensive experience in financial management. Dr. Huanyu Mao, our chief operating officer and chief technology officer, is a pioneer in lithium-ion battery technology since the introduction of lithium-ion batteries in 1992 and was the inventor under seven U.S. patents related to lithium-ion technology. He has led our in-house R&D team in making significant progress in technology innovations and improvements, product development, and optimizing the use of battery cell materials.


Our Strategy


We believe we are well positioned to take advantage of the opportunities presented by growing market demand for rechargeable lithium-based batteries. Our goal is to build on our existing strengths to become a global leader in the development and manufacturing of lithium-based battery cells for leading end-application manufacturers. We intend to achieve this objective by pursuing the following strategies:

Enhance leading-edge technology through continual innovation


We intend to continue committing substantial resources to R&D in order to improve our technologies, develop new products and optimize the use of new battery cell materials. In particular, our R&D efforts will focus on the following:


developing more advanced technologies to increase our productivity and efficiency in the manufacturing process and reduce the per unit cost of production;
11

developing and commercializing cost-effective and easily available substitute materials for existing raw materials that are more expensive and in unstable supply;
enhancing our product quality, reliability and features to satisfy stringent OEM requirements of leading end-application manufacturers and to keep abreast of rapidly changing industry standards and evolving market trends; and
cooperating closely with our partners to improve our technologies and develop new application markets.

  • developing more advanced technologies to increase our productivity and efficiency in the manufacturing process and reduce the per unit cost of production;

  • developing and commercializing cost-effective and easily available substitute materials for existing raw materials that are more expensive and in unstable supply;

  • enhancing our product quality, reliability and features to satisfy stringent OEM requirements of leading end-application manufacturers and to keep abreast of rapidly changing industry standards and evolving market trends; and

  • co-operating closely with our partners to improve our technologies and develop new application markets.

Continue our cost leadership through yield improvements and refining our manufacturing process


We believe that cost-effectiveness will be critical to our future success in an increasingly price-sensitive market. We intend to achieve greater economies of scale by expanding our production capacity. We will also focus on enhancing our yields by reducing our defect ratio through continual worker training and strict raw material quality control, and refining our semi-automated manufacturing process. We intend to increase our productivity and efficiency in the manufacturing process and reduce the per unit cost of production through the use of advanced technologies. We also will focus on continuing our development and commercialization of batteries that utilize cost-effective and easily available substitute materials for expensive raw materials.


Expand our customer base and develop new application markets


We intend to penetrate into new application markets, as well as capture a greater market share in our existing markets.


OEM Cellular Phones.  We are already the market leader in China’s cellular phone replacement battery market. We have also successfully penetrated into the domestic cellular phone OEM market by becoming a designated battery cell supplier for leading local cellular phone brand owners, such as Lenovo, Bird, Konka and Haier. We are currently actively pursuing OEM qualifications from international brand owners such as Nokia and Motorola.
Notebook Computers.  In April 2006, we began trial production of cylindrical battery cells used in notebook computers for a few battery pack manufacturers and began commercial production of cylindrical cells in June 2006. Our goal is to become a leading China-based notebook computer battery cell supplier. We are actively pursuing OEM qualification with leading global brand names and leading notebook computer battery manufacturers. In August 2007, we signed a non-binding letter of intent with HP, under which both parties have undertaken to work together in a set timeframe to reach a definitive agreement for us to supply cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells to HP or HP’s designated battery pack manufacturers for notebook computer batteries to be used in notebook computers manufactured by HP.
Cordless Power Tools and Other Lithium-Phosphate Cell Applications. We began commercial production of lithium-phosphate cells in October 2005 for use in cordless power tools. Currently, we are actively investigating demand for, and pursuing opportunities in, other applications for lithium-phosphate cells, including miner’s lamps, electric bicycles and hybrid electric vehicles.
Ultra-portable electronic devices.   In September 2005, we began commercial production of lithium polymer cells for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets, digital media players and digital audio players. We are actively seeking other market opportunities for our lithium polymer cells for such devices.
12

9


  • OEM cellular phones. We are already the market leader in China’s cellular phone replacement battery market. We have also successfully penetrated into the domestic cellular phone OEM market by becoming a designated battery cell supplier for battery pack suppliers of leading local cellular phone brand owners, such as Lenovo, Gionee, ZTE, Wingtech, Foxconn, Konka and Haier. We have been implementing a strategic transition from the replacement market to the OEM market. We are currently actively pursuing OEM qualifications from international brand owners such as Nokia, Sony Ericsson, LG and Samsung.

  • Notebook computers. In April 2006, we began trial production of cylindrical battery cells used in notebook computers for a few battery pack manufacturers and began commercial production of cylindrical cells in June 2006. Leading brand names such as ASUS and Hasee have designated us as an approved cell provider to approved battery pack manufacturers for their branded batteries. As of September 30, 2009, a first-tier international OEM notebook computer manufacturer determined that our cylindrical lithium-ion cells met their stringent performance and reliability requirements, and accepted us into its approved vendor list. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, we initiated shipments of cylindrical cells to this OEM notebook manufacturer. Such shipments, while initially small, are expected to promote our penetration into the Notebook OEM market when North America begins its economic recovery. We have also been actively pursuing other tier-one OEM qualifications from international brand names, such as Dell and Lenovo.

  • Cordless power tools, mining lamps, uninterruptible power supplies, light electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and other lithium-phosphate cell applications. We began commercial production of lithium- phosphate cells at our Shenzhen facility for use in cordless power tools in October 2005, and for mining lamps in March 2007, at which point our lithium-phosphate cells passed certain related safety tests set by the Quality Supervision and Testing Center of Chemical and Physical Power Sources of the PRC’s Ministry of Information Industry. In December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin, was incorporated to focus on the R&D, manufacturing and distribution of lithium-phosphate cells. We have since shifted all lithium- phosphate cells manufacturing machinery, equipment and personnel from our Shenzhen facility to our Tianjin facility. In October 2008, our Tianjin facility completed construction of its first lithium-phosphate cells production line, and initiated trial production of lithium-phosphate cells. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

  • Ultra-portable electronic devices. In September 2005, we began commercial production of lithium polymer cells for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets, digital media players and digital audio players. During the past fiscal year, we expanded the applications of our lithium polymer cells to notebook computers. During fiscal year 2009, we received orders from notebook computer battery OEM manufacturer STL Technology Co., Ltd. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

Increase manufacturing capacity by leveraging our existing infrastructure, access to low-cost local resources and proximity to the electronics supply chain and electronics manufacturing base


We intend to capitalize on robust growing demandsdemand for lithium-based batteries by leveraging our access to low-cost local resources and our proximity to the electronics supply chain and manufacturing base to further expand our manufacturing capacity. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we had completed approximately 111,000146,372 square meters of manufacturing facilities. To meet strong market demand as well as to capture new application markets, we plan to significantly increase our daily production output of cylindrical cells for notebook computers, high-power lithium-phosphate cells for cordless power tools, mining lamps, uninterruptible power supplies, light electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and other lithium-phosphate cell applications, and lithium polymer cells for high-end electronic devices such as ultra-thin and light cellular phones, notebook computers and Bluetooth headsets. We also intend to increase our production output of prismatic cells, particularly aluminum-case cells for the cellular phone battery OEM market.


10


Our Corporate Structure and Information


We were incorporated in Nevada on October 4, 1999. On January 20, 2005, we completed a share exchange with the stockholders of BAK International, a Hong Kong company, pursuant to which we acquired 100% of BAK International and in exchange, issued our common stock to these stockholders representing 97.2% of our then post-issuance share capital. BAK International was a holding company that owned a 100% PRC operating subsidiary, Shenzhen BAK. On February 14, 2005, we merged with our wholly-owned subsidiary, China BAK Battery, Inc., which was incorporated on February 1, 2005. We are the surviving entity of this merger. On that date we also changed our name from “Medina Coffee, Inc.” to our current name, “China BAK Battery, Inc.” We accounted for this share exchange as a reverse acquisition and succeeded to and are considered to be a continuation of Shenzhen BAK’s operations and financial statements. We conduct our current business through the following three wholly-owned operating subsidiaries in China that we own through BAK International:


Shenzhen BAK, located in Shenzhen, China, incorporated in August 2001, which focuses on the development and manufacture of three types of cells: prismatic cells, cylindrical cells and high-power lithium-phosphate cells;
BAK Electronics located in Shenzhen, China, incorporated in August 2005, which focuses on the development and manufacture of lithium polymer cells; and
BAK Tianjin, located in Tianjin, China, incorporated in December 2006, which focuses on the manufacture of advanced lithium-ion batteries for use in light electric vehicles and uninterruptible power supply units.

In addition, BAK Canada, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAK International, was incorporated in Canada in December 2006 to advance our research and developmentR&D of lithium-ion batteries, and in Octoberbatteries. In November 2007, Shenzhen BAK obtained the Approval Certificate of Overseas Investments of Chinese Enterprises to invest inEurope, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shenzhen BAK, was established in Germany, BAK Europe GmbH, which will focusfocuses on the sales and after-sales services of lithium-ion battery cells.


In August 2008, BAK India, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAK International, was incorporated in India to advance the sales and after-sales services of lithium-ion battery cells. BAK International beneficially owns 100% of BAK India partly through a nominee agreement with one of its employees.

Our principal executive offices are located at BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street, Kuichong Town, Longgang District, Shenzhen, 518119, People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number there is (86-755) 8977-0093.


All inquiries should be directed to us at the address and telephone number of our principal executive offices set forth above. Our website address is www.bak.com.cn. The information contained on our website does not form part of this Report.


Our Products


We develop and manufacture various types of lithium-based rechargeable battery cells, which are the key component of lithium-based batteries used in a wide range of portable electronic applications. Since lithium-based batteries were first commercialized in the early 1990s, they have become the battery of choice for portable electronic devices because of their unique and favorable characteristics. The following table provides a summary of our battery cell offerings and their corresponding end applications:

11



Battery Cell Type
 
End applications*
applications*
Prismatic Cellular phone [1]
(steel-case or aluminum-case)aluminum-case only as of September 30, 2009; Camcorder [2]
steel-case discontinued in January 2009) MP3/MP4 player [1-2]
  Digital camera [1]
  Digital video camera [2-4]
  PDA [1-2]
  BlackberryBlackBerry [1]
   
CylindricalCylindrical
 Notebook computer [6-8]
  Digital camera [1]
  Portable DVD player [4]
  Camcorder [2]
  Portable gaming system [1-6]
   
Lithium polymer Cellular phone [1]
  MP3/MP4 player [1]
  Digital camera [2]
  Bluetooth headset [1]
   
High-power lithium-phosphate Electric drillCordless power tool [4-8]
  Miner’sMining lamp [6-10]
  Electric bicycle [11]Light electric vehicle [24-150]
  Hybrid electric vehicle [500]
 
*Bracketed numbers denote number of cells per particular battery.Uninterruptible power supply [3-34]
13

* Bracketed numbers denote number of cells per particular battery.

Historically, we have derived most of our revenues from prismatic cells. As we expand our production capacity and add new product lines in response to evolving market demands, we have derived and will continue to derive an increasingly greaterincreasing portion of our revenues from our new product lines. The following table sets forth the breakdown of our net revenues by battery cell type for the periods indicated.


  
Year ended September 30, 2007
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
2005
 
  
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
Prismatic cells             
Steel-case cells  34,869  23.9% 64,299  44.7% 56,965  55.9%
Aluminum-case cells  69,916  47.9% 49,514  34.4% 23,721  23.3%
Battery packs  11,798  8.1% 9,843  6.8% 20,169  19.8%
Cylindrical cells  3,422  2.4% 608  0.4% 1,051  1.0%
High-power lithium-phosphate cells  
20,562
  
14.1
%
 
18,537
  
12.9
%
 
-
  
-
 
Lithium polymer cells  5,294  3.6% 1,028  0.8% 16  -*
Total  145,861  100% 143,829  100% 101,922  100%

*Less than 0.1%

  Year ended September 30, 
  2009  2008  2007 
  (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages) 
Prismatic cells                  
     Steel-case cells$4,980  2.4% $29,300  11.9% $34,869  23.9% 
     Aluminum-case cells$111,700  52.9% $130,110  53.0% $69,916  47.9% 
     Battery packs$24,705  11.7% $25,500  10.4% $11,798  8.1% 
Cylindrical cells$55,349  26.2% $42,567  17.4% $3,422  2.4% 
                   
High-power lithium-phosphate cells$179  0.1%  -  - $20,562  14.1% 
                   
Lithium polymer cells$14,231  6.7% $17,871  7.3% $5,294  3.6% 

          Total

$211,144  100% $245,348  100% $145,861  100% 

Our lithium-ion battery cells can be classified into two types based on their structure. Prismatic cells are rectangular in shape and are commonly used in cellular phones and digital cameras. Cylindrical cells are tubular in shape and commonly used in notebook computers, portable DVD players, digital cameras, and camcorders. The following pictures depict our standard prismatic cells and cylindrical cells.

14

12


 
Prismatic cellsCylindrical cells

Prismatic Cells

Prismatic cells contribute to a major portion of our revenue. We initially developed and sold steel-case cells for cellular phone batteries sold in the replacement market. We are currently the largest maker of steel-caseprismatic cells in China, based on production output. Our prismatic cells are contained in metal casing made of either steel or aluminum but are otherwise substantially the same product.. Aluminum-case cells generally are more expensive to manufacture and therefore have a higher cost than steel-case cells, but they are safer and lighter than steel-case cells, and are safer, so they are suited for use in batteries included in the OEM cellular phones. As consumers’To facilitate our transition from the replacement market to the OEM market, and to capitalize on the greater demand for lighter cellular phones has resulted in the demand forand benefits of aluminum-case cells, in the OEM market,including higher selling price and gross margin, we have gradually increased the percentage of aluminum-case cells in the total production of our prismatic cells and intend to further increase this percentage to two-thirds of all the prismatic cells we produce in the near future.have phased out entirely steel-case cell production. At the request of customers that order prismatic battery packs, we also engage battery pack manufacturers to assemble our prismatic cells into batteries for a fee and then sell battery packs to these customers both for the replacement and OEM markets.


market. OEMs with whom we have no contractual relationship may also purchase our battery cells from battery pack manufacturers.

Cylindrical Cells


Cylindrical cells are generally used for notebook computers, portable DVD players, digital cameras, and camcorders. We target our cylindrical cells for the notebook computer market. One notebook computer battery typically contains at least a group of six cylindrical cells working together in a coordinated manner, so the failure of only one cell will affect the performance of the entire battery. Accordingly, cylindrical cells for notebook computers require a higher uniformity than prismatic cells. We had previously produced a small number of cylindrical cells for batteries of portable DVD players. In 2003, we commenced R&D of cylindrical cells designed for notebook computers and in April 2006, we began trial production of a small volume of cylindrical cells. We began commercial production of cylindrical cells in June 2006. We are actively pursuing OEM business opportunities. In August 2007, we signed a nonbinding letter of intent with HP, under which both partiesLeading brand names such as ASUS and Hasee have undertakendesignated us as an approved cell provider to work together in a set timeframe to reach a definitive agreement for us to supply cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells to HP or HP’s designatedapproved battery pack manufacturers for their branded batteries. As of September 30, 2009, a first-tier international OEM notebook computer batteriesmanufacturer determined that our cylindrical lithium-ion cells met their stringent performance and reliability requirements, and accepted us into its approved vendor list. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, we initiated shipments of cylindrical cells to be used inthis OEM notebook computers manufactured by HP.


manufacturer. Such shipments, while initially small, are expected to promote our penetration into the Notebook OEM market when North America begins its economic recovery. We have also been actively pursuing other tier-one OEM qualifications from international brand names, such as Dell and Lenovo.

High-power Lithium-phosphate Cells


The use of new materials have enabled the configuration of high-power lithium-phosphate cells to contain much higher energy density and higher voltage and have a longer life cycle and shorter charge time than other types of lithium-based batteries. These special attributes, coupled with intrinsic safety features, are suitable for batteries used for cordless power tools and other high-power applications. In the first quarter of calendar 2006, we beganmade our first shipment of high-power lithium-phosphate battery cells pursuant to a manufacturing agreement entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK and A123SystemsA123 Systems, Inc. (“A123Systems”)., or A123Systems. Following the termination of our agreement with A123Systems on August 30, 2007, we have been actively investigatingresearching and developing power tool batteries. In December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin, was incorporated to focus on the R&D, manufacturing and distribution of high-power lithium-phosphate cells. In October 2008, it completed construction of its first lithium-phosphate cells production line, and initiated trial production of lithium-phosphate cells. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for and pursuing opportunities in, other applications for high-power lithium-phosphatethese cells including miner’s lamps, electric bicycles and hybrid electric vehicles.

has been increasing.

13


Lithium Polymer Cells


In September 2005, we began producing and shipping lithium polymer battery cells. Our lithium polymer cells do not have a hard metal casing but rather a flexible, pouch-like container, thereby enabling flexible designs and customizations. Lithium polymer cells have expanded our reach to high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets and PDAs such as iPod and BlackBerry devices, and will also allow us to capture the growth opportunities presented by new electronic applications.

15

During the past fiscal year, we have been actively expanding applications of lithium polymer cells to note book computers battery section. During fiscal year 2009, we received orders from notebook computer battery OEM manufacturer STL Technology Co., Ltd. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

Quality Assurance


We enforce strict quality assurance procedures throughout all stages of the manufacturing process. We have four levels of controls to monitor and maintain our product quality: design controls, process controls, material inflow controls and output controls. Our design controls ensure that there are no defects in the design and structure of the products we decide to produce. Our process controls consist of a 15-point check system from the beginning through the end of our production process. Our material inflow controls assure that we obtain our raw materials at a consistent level of quality. Our output controls test for capacity, voltage, visual defects and internal resistance. We believe these four levels of controls are essential to our quality control. We also provide ongoing training to our employees to ensure effective application of our quality assurance procedures.


We monitor quality and reliability in accordance with the requirements of QSR, or Quality System Review, and ISO9001 systems. We have received European Union’s CE attestation, UL authentication, and ISO 9001:2000 certification, a quality management system certification. We have passed stringent quality reviews and thus obtained OEM qualifications from various domestic cellular phone brand names. With our strong technological capabilities and use of automated equipment for core aspects of the manufacturing process, we believe our product quality, in certain key aspects, meets or even exceeds international industry standards.


Manufacturing


Manufacturing of battery cells is a technologically complicated and capital-intensive process, requiring coordinated use of machinery and raw materials at various stages of manufacturing. The primary raw materials used in production of battery cells include electrode materials, electrolytes, foils, cases and caps and separators.


The electrodes are manufactured using active materials, conductive agents and binder which are mixed with liquid. These mixtures are then uniformly coated onto the thin metal foil, then after drying, the electrodes are cut down to the designated sizes.


The positive electrode and negative electrode are then wound together with a separator and inserted into a can, and electrolyte is filled. The sealing completes the battery cell assembly.


The diagrams below illustrate the structure of prismatic cells and cylindrical cells.


14


Prismatic CellCylindrical Cell

Prior to shipping battery cells to our customers, the battery cells will undergo an aging process, and thorough inspections to ensure the cells meet high quality control standards.


Since August 2004, we have been implementing the TPM, or Total Productive Maintenance, program, which involves a newly defined concept for maintaining plants and equipment. The goal of the TPM program is to markedly increase production while, at the same time, increasing employee morale and job satisfaction. Since November 2005, we also began implementing the 5S Philosophy developed in Japan. Based on Japanese words that begin with the letter “S,” the 5S Philosophy focuses on effective work place organization and standardized work procedures. 5S is intended to simplify our work environment, reduce waste and non-value activity while improving quality efficiency and safety.

16

A simplified manufacturing process is illustrated below:



These cells are then integrated into packages which are customized into a wide variety of configurations to interface with different electronic devices.


We have adopted a semi-automated manufacturing process. We use fully automated machinery to process key aspects of the manufacturing process to ensure high uniformity and precision, while leaving the non-key aspects of the manufacturing process to manual labor. For example, we have an automated production line to manufacture our cylindrical cells used for notebook computer batteries to ensure a high level of uniformity and precision. We intend to further improve our automated production lines. As we have easy access to an ample supply of low-cost skilled labor, we believe our unique semi-automated manufacturing process will enable us to achieve desired cost-competitiveness by substantially lowering our manufacturing cost without compromising our product quality and uniformity.


For the last few years, we have been expanding our manufacturing capacity to meet the growing market demand for battery products. As the increasingly intense competition in our industry has driven down the per unit profit margins of our products, we strive to continue investing heavily in our manufacturing infrastructure to further increase our manufacturing capacity, enabling us to lower the per unit cost of our products, and thereby maintaining our expected total level of profitability as a whole.


profitability.

Suppliers


We have built a comprehensive supply chain of materials and equipment. The primary raw materials used in manufacturingthe manufacture of lithium-ion batteries include electrode materials, cases and caps, foils, electrolyte and separator. Cost of these raw materials is a key factor in pricing our products. We believe that there is an ample supply of most of the raw materials we need in China. We are seeking to identify alternative raw material suppliers to the extent there are viable alternatives and to expand our use of alternative raw materials. We have also restructured our operations in an effort to streamline corporate resources and improve internal efficiency, with a particular focus on manufacturing and sales. To ensure the quality of our suppliers, we use only those suppliers who have demonstrated quality control and reliability.


We invite our suppliers to attend meetings we convene and organize to promote our relationships.

15


We aim to maintain multiple supply sources for each of our key raw materials to ensure that supply problems with any one supplier will not materially disrupt our operations. In addition, we strive to develop strategic relationships with new suppliers to secure a stable supply of materials and introduce competition in our supply chain, thereby increasing our ability to negotiate a better pricing and reducing our exposure to possible price fluctuations.


Our economies of scale enable us to purchase materials in large volumes, offering us leverage to secure better pricing, and to a lesser degree, increasing the extent to which our suppliers rely on our purchase orders. We believe this relationship of mutual reliance will enable us to reduce our exposure to possible price fluctuations. For example, we have entered into a volume purchase agreement with some of our major suppliers, such as CITIC Guoan, from whom we purchase cathode material and lithium cobalt dioxide, one of the key materials for battery cells.

17

As of September 30, 2007,2009, our key raw material suppliers were as follows:


Materials
 
Main Suppliers
Case and caps 
Roofer Group Company, Yijinli technology company
Shenzhen Tongli Precision Stamping ProductsHigh-tech Co., Ltd.
, Shenzhen Dongri Technology Industry Co., Ltd.
Cathode materials CITIC Guoan, Hunan Reshine New Material Ltd., Beijing Easpring Material Technology Co. Ltd
Anode materials Qingdao Taineng, Changsha graphite;Dahua, BTR Energy Materials Co., Ltd., Ningbo Shanshan New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
Aluminum foil Aluminum Corporation of America, Shanghai
Copper foil Huizhou United Copper Foil
Electrolyte Zhangjiagang Guotai-Huarong New Chemical Materials Co., Ltd., Tianjin Jinniu Electric Source Material Co., Ltd., Dongwan Shanshan Battery Material Co., Ltd.
Separator Ube Industries, ENTEK, CELGARDSystems Corporation

We source our manufacturing equipment both locally and from overseas, based on consideration of their cost and function. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we purchased our key equipment from the following suppliers:


Instruments
 
Main Suppliers
Coating machine Beijing 706 Factory / Hirano Tecseed Co., Ltd.
Mixer Beijing 706 FactorySystems corporation
Press machine SevenStar HuachuangHuachuang; Innovative Machine Corporation, Xingtai Naknor Electrode Rolling Equipment Co., Ltd.
Ultrasonic spot welding machine Zhenjiang Tianhua Machinery and Electrical Co., Ltd.
Laser seam welder Wuhan Chutian Laser Group
Vacuum oven Jiangsu Wujiang SonglingJiangling
Winding machine Kaido Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Yinghe Technology Co., Ltd
Slitting machine Nishimura Mfg. Co., Ltd.
Electrolyte filling machine BAK (internally developed) / Canon Machinery Corporation, Haibar Systems Ltd.
Aging equipment Guangzhou Qingtian Industrial Co., Ltd., HangzhonHangzhou Hangke
Testing and sorting equipment Guangzhou Qingtian Industrial Co., Ltd.; Guangzhou Bule-key Electronic Industry Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Liuyu Electronics Co., Ltd.Hangzhou Hangke

16


Customers


Prismatic Cells.Cells. Our customers for prismatic cells used for cellular phones in the OEM market and replacement market are local leading battery pack manufacturers, including


SCUD (Fujian) Electronics Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Chaolitong Electronics Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Anshunhang Trading Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Weiliwang Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Shenzhen Hailutong Electronics Co., Ltd
18

Our customers in the OEM market consist of cellular phone brand names as well as pack manufacturers designated by cellular phone brand owners. including:

  • SCUD (Fujian) Electronics Co., Ltd.

  • Maxx Mobile Communications Ltd..

  • Shenzhen Weiliwang Electronics Co., Ltd.

  • Shenzhen Hailutong Electronics Co., Ltd.

  • Shenzhen Huatiantong Technology Co., Ltd.

We primarily sell our prismatic cells used forto the OEM market in two ways. On most occasions, we sell our prismatic cells to battery pack manufacturers certified by cellular phone brand owners, which will pack our cells into branded batteries and sell them to the brand owner. Cellular phone brand owners also may directly place orders with us. In such a case, we engage a pack manufacturer to assemble our prismatic cells into batteries for a fee, and then arrange to deliver the batteries to the OEM brand owners.


Cylindrical Cells. We are capablea mass producer of mass producing cylindrical cells used for notebook computers. Recently,During the past fiscal year, a first-tier OEM notebook computer manufacturer determined that our cylindrical lithium-ion cells met their stringent performance and reliability requirements, and accepted us into its approved vendor list. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, we began shipping a small numberinitiated shipments of our cylindrical cells to a fewthis OEM notebook manufacturer. Such shipments, while initially small, pack manufacturers in Taiwan.are expected to promote our penetration into the Notebook OEM market when North America begins its economic recovery. Leading brand names such as ASUS and Hasee have designated us as an approved cell provider for their branded batteries. We arehave also been actively pursuing other tier-one OEM qualifications with leading notebook computer manufacturers.


from international brand names, such as Dell and Lenovo.

High-power Lithium-phosphate.Lithium-phosphate. We began commercial production of lithium-phosphate cells in October 2005 for use in cordless power tools. Currently, we are actively seeking other market opportunities for ourIn December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin, was incorporated to focus on the R&D, manufacturing and distribution of high-power lithium-phosphate cells. In October 2008, construction of its first high-power, lithium-phosphate cells including miner’s lamps,production line was completed and it commenced trial production. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and hybridother applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles.


vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

Lithium Polymer.Polymer. Orders we received for lithium polymer cells tend to be small in quantity, but vary in specifications based on the attributes of a particular electronic application. We sell our lithium polymer cells to certain pack manufacturers, which pack our cells and sell the final products. We also have the ability to pack our lithium polymer cells into batteries that carry our own trademark.


During the past fiscal year,we expanded the applications of our lithium polymer cells to notebook computers. During fiscal year 2009, we received orders from notebook computer battery OEM manufacturer STL Technology Co., Ltd. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

17


We sell our products domestically and internationally. The following table sets forth certain information relating to our total revenues by location of our customers for the periods indicated.

  Year ended September 30, 
  2009  2008  2007  
  (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages) 
                   
PRC Mainland 132,710  62.9%  175,302  71.5%  105,567  72.4% 
PRC Taiwan 47,664  22.6%  41,905  17.1%  7,025  4.8% 
India 10,526  5.0%  5,661  2.3%  4,299  2.9% 
United States of America 1,413  0.7%  75  -(1) 20,740  14.2% 
Hong Kong, China 16,086  7.6%  19,956  8.1%  6,418  4.4% 
Others* 2,745  1.2%  2,449  1.0%  1,812  1.3% 
                                 Total 211,144  100%  245,348  100%  145,861  100.0% 

______________

  
Year ended September 30,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
2005
 
  
(in thousands, except percentages)
 
Region             
PRC Mainland  105,567  72.4% 96,670  67.2% 72,352  71.0%
United States of America  20,740  14.2% 18,641  13.0% -  - 
Hong Kong, China  6,418  4.4% 17,221  12.0% 17,535  17.2%
Others*
  13,136  9.0% 11,297  7.8% 12,035  11.8%
Total  145,861  100.0% 143,829  100% 101,922  100%

*Includes Taiwan, the Middle East, Italy, Germany, Turkey, and India.
(1)     Less than 0.1%.
*       Includes the Middle East, Italy, Germany, and Turkey.

For our international sales, we sell our products directly to distributors, as well as pack manufacturers in these countries and territories. If we receive orders from distributors for batteries rather than cells, we engage pack manufacturers to assemble our cells into batteries for a fee, and then arrange to deliver the batteries to fulfill the orders.


A small number of prismatic cell customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of our revenue. In the year ended September 30, 2007, sales to A123Systems accounted for 14% of our revenue. In the same period,2009, our top five and top ten customers in aggregate contributed to approximately 37.1%27.9% and 48.2%38.2% of our revenue, respectively. As we expand our product portfolio and target new market segments, our customer composition as well as the identity and concentration of our top customers are expected to change from period to period. Our agreement with A123Systems, as amended on August 18, 2005, terminated in accordance with its terms on August 30, 2007. Currently, we are actively investigating demand for, and pursuing opportunities in, other product lines, including miner’smining lamps, electric bicycles anduninterruptible power supplies, hybrid electric vehicles, and light electric vehicles.


Sales and Marketing


We have built an extensive sales and service network in China, highlighted by our strong presence in China’s economically prosperous coastal regions where we generate a significant portion of our sales. We have representative offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou,Fuzhou, and Quanzhou,Taiwan, targeting our key customers. Our marketing department at headquarters is responsible for our marketing efforts in the PRC, and our sales staff in these representative offices conducts sales and provideprovides post-sales services to brand owners and pack manufacturers in each designated area. We offer different price incentives to encourage large-volume and long-term customers. We have distribution officesestablished subsidiaries in Taiwan,Germany and India, and Germany where our sales representatives market and sell our products and also provide after-sale service.services. In August 2008, we hired North America sales representatives based in Austin, Texas and Vancouver, British Columbia to better serve the North America market by bringing us into closer communications with our customers and prospects in the United States and Canada. We aim to add additional representative offices in the Middle East Canada, Korea and South America.Korea. As we expand our business, our sales and marketing staff has increased to more than one hundred, most of whom are professional salespersons and technicians.

19

Our sales staff works closely with our customers to understand their needs and provide feedback to us so that we can better address their needs and improve the quality and features of our products.


We engage in marketing activities such as attending industry-specific conferences and exhibitions to promote our products and brand name. We also advertise in industry journals and magazines and through the Internet to market our products. For example, in February 2005, we participated in international electronic components and materials exhibitions in India, and in March and May 2005, we participated in information and communication technology exhibitions in Hanover, Germany and Sydney, Australia, respectively. We believe these activities are conducive in promoting our products and brand name among key industry participants.


18


Competition


We face intense competition from battery cell makers in China, as well as in Korea and Japan for each of our product types. The following table sets forth our major competitors based on product type:


Product Type
 
Competitors
Prismatic Japan:Sanyo Group, Sony Corporation, Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd,Ltd., NEC Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd;Ltd.
  Korea:LG Group, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd GS Group,
 China:BYD Company Limited, Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-StockJoint- Stock Co., Ltd, Harbin Coslight Technology International Group Co.Ltd., Ltd
Cylindrical Japan:Sanyo Group, Sony Corporation, Matsushita Electric Works
  Korea:LG Group, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
High-power lithium-phosphate Japan:Sanyo Group, Sony Corporation
  Canada:E-one Moli Energy (Canada)BYD Company Limited
  
Lithium polymerJapan:ChinaSanyo Group, Sony Corporation
Lithium polymerJapan:Amperex Technology Limited
  China:Amperex Technology LimitedLG Group, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd ,

We believe that we are able to leverage our low-cost advantage to compete favorably with our competitors. Compared to Korean and Japanese cell makers, we are able to source our needs for skilled labor and raw materials locally and economically. Our substantially expanded production capacity has translated into greater purchasing power, thereby helping us negotiate lower purchase prices for materials. Furthermore, our strong proprietary technologies and use of a combination of manual labor and automation at the key stages of the manufacturing process enable us to enhance our production efficiency, resulting in further reduction in cost, while ensuring high uniformity and high-quality standards.


Research and Development


We have established an advanced R&D center. To enhance our product quality, reduce cost, and keep up with technological advances and evolving market trends, our R&D center focuses on advancement in technologies relating to new materials and new cells with prospects for use in new end application markets, such as mining lamps, hybrid electric vehicles. For example, we have successfully developed technologies to use cost-effective ingredients to reduce the amount of lithium cobalt dioxide being used in our cells. Lithium cobalt dioxide is the most expensive ingredient currently required to make lithium-based cells because cobalt is not renewable.

20

vehicles, light electric vehicles, electric bicycles, and uninterruptible power supplies.

Our in-house R&D team consists of 240200 researchers and scientists, led by Dr. Mao, our chief operating officer and chief technology officer, who pioneered core technologies in lithium-ion batteries since their introduction in 1992 and was the inventor under seven U.S. patents related to lithium-ion technology. In December 2006, we also established a wholly-owned subsidiary, BAK Canada, to focus on the research and development of lithium-ion batteries. It comprises a group of experts led by Mr. Kenneth G. Broom, our vice president of International OEM Business,Chief Operating Officer, who brings 2325 years’ li-ion battery industry working experience. Our strong R&D capabilities have enabled us to obtain various government-sponsored R&D grants. We have been accredited as a “new and high-technology company” in Shenzhen, entitling us to enjoy preferential tax treatment and other government incentive grants and subsidies. Furthermore, we collaborate with a number of reputable research institutes and science and technology universities in China, allowing us to capitalize on their R&D results economically.


In December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin was incorporated to focus on research and development, manufacturing and distribution of high-power lithium-phosphate cells. We have since shifted all lithium-phosphate cells manufacturing machinery, equipment and personnel from our Shenzhen facility to our Tianjin facility. In October 2008, our Tianjin facility completed construction of its first lithium-phosphate cells production line, and initiated trial production of lithium-phosphate cells. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

19


Employees


We had a total of 6,970, 8,468,8,616, 8,200, and 8,6167,099 employees as of September 30, 2005,2007, September 30, 20062008 and September 30, 2007, 2009, respectively. We have developed a strong company culture that encourages individual thinking and creativity, continual self-improvement and strong commitment to provide high-quality products to our customers.


Facilities


See Item 2. “Properties.”


Intellectual Property


We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, and employee non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we have registered 4632 trademarks in the PRC, including BAK in both English and in Chinese characters as well as our logo. Some of ourlogo, and have registered 29 trademarks are also registered in the United States, European Union, Korea, Russia, Taiwan and Hong Kong. We have registered the following Internet and WAP domain name: www.bak.com.cn. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we have registered 195344 patents in the PRC relating to battery cell materials, design and manufacturing processes, and we had 305573 pending patent applications filed in the PRC and 20109 in other countries.


We also have unpatented proprietary technologies for our product offerings and key stages of the manufacturing process. Our management and key technical personnel have entered into agreements requiring them to keep confidential all information relating to our customers, methods, business and trade secrets during their terms of employment with us and thereafter and to assign to China BAKus their inventions, technologies and designs they develop during their term of employment with us.


We have institutionalized our efforts to safeguard our intellectual property rights by establishing an internal department that includes professionals such as attorneys, engineers, information managers and archives managers responsible for handling matters relating to our intellectual property rights. We have published internally a series of rules to protect our intellectual property rights.


Environmental Compliance


As we conduct our manufacturing activities in China, we are subject to the requirements of PRC environmental laws and regulations on air emission, waste water discharge, solid waste and noise. We aim to comply with environmental laws and regulations and have passed ISO14001 certification for environmental practices. We have built environmental treatment facilities concurrently with construction of our manufacturing facilities, where waste air, waste water and waste solids we generate can be treated in accordance with the relevant requirements. We also outsource disposal of solid waste we generate to a third party contractor. Certain key materials used in manufacturing, such as cobalt dioxide, electrolyte and separators, have proven innocuous to worker’s health and safety as well as the environment. We are not subject to any admonitions, penalties, investigations or inquiries imposed by the environmental regulators, nor are we subject to any claims or legal proceedings to which we are named as defendant for violation of any environmental law or regulation. We do not have any reasonable basis to believe that there is any threatened claim, action or legal proceedings against us that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

21

20



PRC Government Regulations


Environmental Regulations


The major environmental regulations applicable to us include the PRC Environmental Protection Law, the PRC Law on the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution and its Implementation Rules, the PRC Law on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution and its Implementation Rules, the PRC Law on the Prevention and Control of Solid Waste Pollution, and the PRC Law on the Prevention and Control of Noise Pollution.


Patent Protection in China


The PRC’s intellectual property protection regime is consistent with those of other modern industrialized countries. The PRC has domestic laws for the protection of rights in copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets. The PRC is also a signatory to most of the world’s major intellectual property conventions, including:


Convention establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO Convention) (June 4, 1980);
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (March 19, 1985);
Patent Cooperation Treaty (January 1, 1994); and
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) (November 11, 2001).

Patents in the PRC are governed by the China Patent Law and its Implementing Regulations, each of which went into effect in 1985. Amended versions of the China Patent Law and its Implementing Regulations came into effect in 2001 and 2003, respectively.


The PRC is a signatory to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, in accordance with which any person who has duly filed an application for a patent in one signatory country shall enjoy, for the purposes of filing in the other countries, a right of priority during the period fixed in the convention (12 months for inventions and utility models, and 6 months for industrial designs).


The Patent Law covers three kinds of patents: patents for inventions, utility models and designs respectively. The Chinese patent system adopts the principle of first to file. This means that, where more than one person files a patent application for the same invention, a patent can only be granted to the people who first filed the application. Consistent with international practice, the PRC only allows the patenting of inventions or utility models that possess the characteristics of novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability. For a design to be patentable, it should not be identical with or similar to any design which, before the date of filing, has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad or has been publicly used in the country, and should not be in conflict with any prior right of another.


PRC law provides that anyone wishing to exploit the patent of another must conclude a written licensing contract with the patent holder and pay the patent holder a fee. One rather broad exception to this, however, is that, where a party possesses the means to exploit a patent but cannot obtain a license from the patent holder on reasonable terms and in a reasonable period of time, the PRC State Intellectual Property Office, or SIPO, is authorized to grant a compulsory license. A compulsory license also can be granted where a national emergency or any extraordinary state of affairs occurs or where the public interest so requires. The patent holder may appeal such decision within three months from receiving notification by filing a suit in a people’s court. SIPO, however, has not granted any compulsory license up to now.


PRC law defines patent infringement as the exploitation of a patent without the authorization of the patent holder. A patent holder who believes histheir patent is being infringed may file a civil suit or file a complaint with a PRC local Intellectual Property Administrative Authority, which may order the infringer to stop the infringing acts. A preliminary injunction may be issued by the People’s Court upon the patentee’s or the interested parties’ request before instituting any legal proceedings or during the proceedings. Evidence preservation and property preservation measures also are available both before and during the litigation. Damages in the case of patent infringement isare calculated as either the loss suffered by the patent holder arising from the infringement or the benefit gained by the infringer from the infringement. If it is difficult to ascertain damages in this manner, damages may be reasonably determined in an amount ranging from one to more times of the license fee under a contractual license. The infringing party may also be fined by the Administration of Patent Management in an amount of up to three times the unlawful income earned by such infringing party. If there is no unlawful income so earned, the infringing party may be fined in an amount of up to RMB500,000,RMB50,000, or approximately $67,664.50.

22
$7,323.65 as of September 30, 2009.

21



Tax


Under applicablePRC income tax laws and regulations, before January 1, 2008, a foreign-invested enterprise, or FIE, was generally subject to an enterprise locatedincome tax rate of 33.0%, which included a 30% state income tax and a 3.0% local income tax. However, from at least calendar year 2002 through calendar year 2007, an enterprise recognized as a “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Shenzhen, including the district where our operations are located, is subjectSpecial Economic Zone” under PRC tax law was entitled to a 15% enterprisepreferential income tax. Further, according to PRC laws and regulations, foreign investedtax rate of 15%. Moreover, a foreign-invested manufacturing enterprises are entitled to,enterprise, starting from theirits first profitable calendar year after offset of accumulated taxable losses, was entitled to a two-year exemption from enterprise income tax followed by a three-year 50% reduction in its enterprise income tax rate. OurAn enterprise qualified for such treatment may receive a further tax rate reduction related to the size of qualified capital contributions received. In addition, from at least calendar year 2002 through calendar year 2007, an enterprise qualified as an “advanced technology enterprise” under PRC subsidiaries, tax law was also entitled to a 50% reduction of income taxes.

Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics are both registered and operate in Shenzhen, the PRC, and are each recognized as “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Special Economic Zone”. As a result, they have been entitled to a two-year exemption from enterprise income tax and a reducedpreferential enterprise income tax rate of 7.5%15%. In accordance with the relevant income tax laws, the profits of Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics were fully exempted from income tax for two years from the first profitable calendar year of operations after offset of accumulated taxable losses, followed by a 50% exemption for the followingimmediate next three years. As such, forcalendar years (the “tax holiday”).

The tax holiday of Shenzhen BAK commenced in 2002, the first two yearscalendar year in which Shenzhen BAK had assessable profit, and ended on December 31, 2003, Shenzhen BAK was exempted from any enterprise income tax. Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, Shenzhen BAK was subject to an enterprise income tax rate of 7.5%. BAK Electronic, established in August 2005, is eligible for the same preferential tax treatment applicable to Shenzhen BAK. It is currently in its tax holiday and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax. BAK Tianjin is also exempt from any enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.


2006. In addition, due to the additional capital invested incontributed by BAK International to Shenzhen BAK in both 2005 and 2006 and Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as an advanced technology enterprise in 2007 and 2008, Shenzhen BAK was granted a preferential income tax rate of 3.309%7.5%, 3.82%11.8% and 6.12%12.6% for calendar years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In accordance with the transition period of the new corporate income tax law (the “New CIT Law”) and before considering the above-mentioned tax concessions, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rate for calendar years 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rates after consideration of its tax concessions are expected to be 15% for both calendar years 2010 and 2011 and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%.

BAK Electronics, established in August 2005, has been eligible for the same preferential tax treatment previously applicable to Shenzhen BAK and was in the tax holiday and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax for calendar years 2006 and 2007 respectively.


Furthermore,followed by a three-year 50% reduction in its enterprise income tax rate. In addition, pursuant to encourage foreign investorsthe transition period of the New CIT Law and before considering the above-mentioned 50% reduction, BAK Electronics’ income tax rates for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011 are expected to introduce advanced technologiesbe 20%, 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to China, the PRC government has offered additional tax incentives to enterprises that are classified as a foreign invested enterprise with advanced technologies. Accordingbe subject to an official notice issued byincome tax rate of 25%. Therefore, BAK Electronics’ income tax rate after consideration of its tax holiday are expected to be 10%, 11% and 24% for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. BAK Electronics did not incur any enterprise income tax for the Shenzhen Municipal Trade and Industry Bureau, current year due to the current tax losses carried forward from the calendar year 2008.

Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics received such designation in August 2005. Asaggregate a result, as long as Shenzhen BAK maintains this designation, it may applytax benefit of $103,000 pursuant to thetheir tax authority to extend theholiday and preferential status of its enterprise tax rate for another three years, until December 31, 2009.


the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, or $0.007 per basic share.

BAK Tianjin is currently paying no enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.

22


On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of the PRC determined to adopt a new corporate income tax law in its fifth plenary session.the New CIT Law. The new corporate income tax lawNew CIT Law unifies the application scope, tax rate, tax deduction and preferential policy for both domestic enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises.FIEs. The new corporate income tax law will beNew CIT Law became effective on January 1, 2008. According to the new corporate income tax law,New CIT Law, the applicable income tax rate for our operating subsidiariesShenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin will be 25% after their preferential tax holidays and the transition period have ended. During the transition period, tax rates for subject entities was 18% for the calendar year 2008, and is expected to be 20%, 22%, and 24% for the calendar years 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively, before the application of applicable tax holidays or other tax preferences.

Our Canada subsidiary, BAK Canada, is subject to change. As implementation detailsCanada profits tax at the rate of 38%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Canada, it has not yet been announced, we cannot be surepaid any Canada profits tax.

Our German subsidiary, BAK Europe, is subject to Germany’s profits tax at the rate of 25%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Germany, it has not paid any German profits tax.

Our India subsidiary, BAK India, is subject to India profits tax at the potential impactrate of this new corporate30%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in India, it has not paid any Indian profits tax.

Our Hong Kong subsidiary, BAK International, is subject to Hong Kong profits tax law on our financial positionat the rate of 16.5% . However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Hong Kong, it has not paid any Hong Kong profits tax.

Our effective tax benefit rate was 67.9%, 11.6%, and operating results.


8.2% for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

Pursuant to the Provisional Regulation of China on Value Added Tax and theirits implementing rules, all entities and individuals that are engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of repairs and replacement services and the importation of goods in China are generally required to pay VAT at a rate of 17.0% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by the taxpayer. Further, when exporting goods, the exporter is entitled to a portion ofsome or all of the refund of VAT that it has already paid or borne. Our imported raw materials that are used for manufacturing export products and are deposited in bonded warehouses are exempt from import VAT.


Foreign Currency Exchange


Under the PRC foreign currency exchange regulations applicable to us, the Renminbi is convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of Renminbi for capital account items, such as direct investment, loan, security investment and repatriation of investment, however, is still subject to the approval of the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprisesFIEs may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents and, in the case of capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign-invested enterprisesFIEs outside of China are also subject to limitations, which include approvals by the Ministry of Commerce, the SAFE and the State Reform and Development Commission.

23


Dividend Distributions


Under applicable PRC regulations, foreign-invested enterprisesFIEs in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a foreign-invested enterpriseFIE in China is required to set aside at least 10.0% of theirits after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year to its general reserves until the accumulative amount of such reserves reach 50.0% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The board of directors of a foreign-invested enterpriseFIE has the discretion to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits to staff welfare and bonus funds, which may not be distributed to equity owners except in the event of liquidation.


23


Item

ITEM 1A.     Risk Factors.


RISK FACTORS.

Risks Related to Our Business


Our limited operating history may not serve as an adequate basis to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.


We have a limited operating history. We are engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing and sales of lithium-based rechargeable battery cells used for a wide range of portable electronic applications. We were established in Shenzhen, China in August 2001 and commenced operations in June 2002. Our limited operating history may not provide a meaningful basis for an investor to evaluate our business, financial performance and prospects. We may not be able to:


maintain our leading position in the cellular phone battery replacement market;
retain existing customers or acquire new customers;
diversify our revenue sources by successfully developing and selling our products in the global cellular phone OEM market, notebook computer battery market and other markets;
keep up with evolving industry standards and market developments;
respond to competitive market conditions;
maintain adequate control of our expenses;
manage our relationships with our suppliers;
attract, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel; or
protect our proprietary technologies.

If we are unsuccessful in addressing any of these challenges, our business may be materially and adversely affected.


General

We face risks related to general domestic and global economic conditions can significantly affect our financial results.


Our financial results can be significantly affected by generaland to the current credit crisis.

We currently generate sufficient operating cash flows, which combined with access to the credit markets, provides us with significant discretionary funding capacity. However, the current uncertainty arising out of domestic and global economic conditions, inflationary pressures, high labor or materialincluding the recent disruption in credit markets, poses a risk to the economies in which we operate that has impacted demand for our products and commodity costsservices, and unforeseen changes in consumer demand or buying patterns. Changes inmay impact our ability to generate sufficient internal cash flows,manage normal relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors. If the current situation deteriorates significantly, our business could be materially negatively impacted, including such areas as well as access to capital markets, interest rate fluctuationsreduced demand for our products and other conditions which impact the ability to borrow, may negatively affect our ability to support capital expansion plans, general operations, research and development activity, and advertising and promotional activities.

24


Instabilityservices from a slow-down in the world financial markets and the globalgeneral economy, including (and as a result of) the conflicts in the Middle East, may create uncertainty in the industries in which the Company operates, and may adversely affect its business.or supplier or customer disruptions resulting from tighter credit markets. In addition, terrorist activities may cause unpredictable or unfavorable economic conditions and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s operating results and financial condition.

We are primarily dependent on sales of lithium-ion battery cells for the cellular phone battery replacement market. A reduction in the volume or average price of lithium-ion battery cells that we sell for this market would cause our overall revenue to decline.


We have derived a major portion of revenues to date from sales of our lithium-ion battery cells for the cellular phone battery replacement market. While we intend to diversify our revenue sources by expanding to the global cellular phone OEM market, notebook computers and high-power electrical tool markets, we expect that sales of battery cells used for the cellular phone battery replacement market will continue to comprise a significant portion of our revenues in the near future. Accordingly, any decrease in the demand for our battery cells in the replacement market resulting from success of competing products, slower than expected growth of sales in the replacement market or other adverse developments relating to the replacement market may materially and adversely affect our business and cause our overall revenue to decline. In addition, our expansion to the global cellular phone battery OEM market and other markets may not increase our revenue to a level that would enable us to materially reduce our dependence on sales of battery cells for the cellular phone replacement market.


24


Our business depends on the growth in demand for portable electronic devices.


As the market demand for portable electronic devices is directly related to the demand for our products, a fast growing portable electronic device market will be critical to the success of our business. In anticipation of an expected increase in demand for portable electronic devices such as cellular phones and notebook computers in the next few years, we have expanded our manufacturing capacity. However, the markets we have targeted, including those of the PRC, may not achieve the level of growth we expect. If this market fails to achieve our expected level of growth, we will have excess production capacity and may not be able to generate enough revenue to maintain our profitability.


Our future success depends on the success of manufacturers of the end applications that use our products.


As we expand to the battery markets for global OEM cellular phones, notebook computers and other portable electronic devices, our future success depends on whether end application manufacturers are willing to use batteries that incorporate our products. To secure acceptance of our products, we must constantly develop and introduce more reliable and cost-effective battery cells with enhanced functionality to meet evolving industry standards. Our failure to gain acceptance of our products from these manufacturers could materially and adversely affect our future success.


Even if a manufacturer decides to use batteries that incorporate our products, the manufacturer may not be able to market and sell its products successfully. The manufacturer’s inability to market and sell its products successfully, whether from lack of market acceptance or otherwise, could materially and adversely affect our business and prospects because this manufacturer may not order new products from us. If we cannot achieve the expected level of sales, we will not be able to make sufficient profits to offset the expenditures we have incurred to expand our production capacity, nor will we be able to grow our business. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future success would be materially and adversely affected.


We experience fluctuations in quarterly and annual operating results.


Our quarterly and annual operating results have fluctuated in the past and likely will fluctuate in the future. The demand for our products is driven largely by demand for the end-product applications that are powered by our products. Accordingly, the rechargeable battery industry is affected by market conditions that are often outside our control. Our results of operations may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, including seasonal variations in consumer demand for batteries and their end applications, capacity ramp up by competitors, industry-wide technological changes, the loss of a key customer and the postponement, rescheduling or cancellation of large orders by a key customer. As a result of these factors and other risks discussed in this section, period-to-period comparisons should not be relied upon to predict our future performance.

25


Our failure to keep up with rapid technological changes and evolving industry standards may cause our products to become obsolete and less marketable, resulting in loss of market share to our competitors.


The lithium-based battery market is characterized by changing technologies and evolving industry standards, which are difficult to predict. This, coupled with frequent introduction of new products and models, has shortened product life cycles and may render our products obsolete or unmarketable. Our ability to adapt to evolving industry standards and anticipate future standards will be a significant factor in maintaining and improving our competitive position and our prospects for growth. To achieve this goal, we have invested and plan to continue investing significant financial resources in our R&D infrastructure. R&D activities, however, are inherently uncertain, and we might encounter practical difficulties in commercializing our research results. Accordingly, our significant investment in our R&D infrastructure may not bear fruit. On the other hand, our competitors may improve their technologies or even achieve technological breakthroughs that would render our products obsolete or less marketable. Therefore, our failure to effectively keep up with rapid technological changes and evolving industry standards by introducing new and enhanced products may cause us to lose our market share and to suffer a decrease in our revenue.


25


A change in our product mix may cause our results of operations to differ substantially from the anticipated results in any particular period.


Our overall profitability may not meet expectations if our products, customers or geographic mix are substantially different than anticipated. Our profit margins vary among products, customers and geographic markets. Consequently, if our mix of any of these is substantially different from what is anticipated in any particular period, our profitability could be lower than anticipated.


Failure to successfully obtain OEM certification from international cellular phone brand owners may materially and adversely affect our future growth.


We intend to leverage our position in the cellular phone battery replacement market and to expand to the global cellular phone OEM market. To achieve this goal, we must first be qualified by international brand owners. We have started the process with Motorola, Nokia, Sony Ericsson, LG and other international brand owners.Samsung . Since international brand owners have very stringent requirements, the qualification process can be lengthy and costly for new component suppliers such as China BAK.us. Our failure to obtain qualifications from international brand owners would have a material adverse effect on our ability to execute our business plan and achieve the level of growth we have planned.


We may not be able to manage our expansion of operations effectively.


We were established in August 2001 and have grown rapidly since. We are in the process of significantly expanding our business in order to meet the increasing demand for our products, as well as capture new market opportunities. As we continue to grow, we must continue to improve our operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, increase manufacturing capacity and output, and expand, train and manage our growing employee base. In order to fund our on-going operations and our future growth, we need to have sufficient internal sources of liquidity or access to additional financing from external sources. Furthermore, our management will be required to maintain and strengthen our relationships with our customers, suppliers and other third parties. As a result, our continued expansion has placed, and will continue to place, significant strains on our management personnel, systems and resources. We also will need to further strengthen our internal control and compliance functions to ensure that we will be able to comply with our legal and contractual obligations and minimize our operational and compliance risks. Our current and planned operations, personnel, systems, internal procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future growth. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, execute our business strategies or respond to competitive pressures.


We may not be able to substantially increase our manufacturing output in order to maintain our cost competitiveness.


We believe that our ability to provide cost-effective products is one of the most significant factors that contributed to our current success and will be essential for our future growth. We believe this is one of our competitive advantages over our Japanese and Korean competitors. In order to continue doing so, we will need to increase our manufacturing output to a level that will enable us to substantially reduce the cost of our products on a per unit basis through economies of scale. However, our ability to substantially increase our manufacturing output is subject to significant constraints and uncertainties, including:


the need to raise significant additional funds to purchase and prepay raw materials or to build additional manufacturing facilities, which we may be unable to obtain on reasonable terms or at all;

  • the need to raise significant additional funds to purchase and prepay raw materials or to build additional manufacturing facilities, which we may be unable to obtain on reasonable terms or at all;

  • delays and cost overruns as a result of a number of factors, many of which may be beyond our control, such as increases in raw material prices and problems with equipment vendors;

26


delays and cost overruns as a result of a number of factors, many of which may be beyond our control, such as increases in raw material prices and problems with equipment vendors;
delays or denial of required approvals by relevant government authorities;
diversion of significant management attention and other resources; and
failure to execute our expansion plan effectively.

  • delays or denial of required approvals by relevant government authorities;

  • diversion of significant management attention and other resources; and

  • failure to execute our expansion plan effectively.

If we are unable to increase our manufacturing output because of any of the risks described above, we may be unable to maintain our competitive position or achieve the growth we expect. Moreover, even if we expand our manufacturing output, we may not be able to generate sufficient customer demand for our products to support our increased production output.


Maintaining our manufacturing operations requires significant capital expenditures, and our inability or failure to maintain our operations would have a material adverse impact on our market share and ability to generate revenue.


We had capital expenditures of approximately $65.8$41.5 million and $41.4$51.2 million in fiscal years 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively. We may incur significant additional capital expenditures as a result of unanticipated expenses, regulatory changes and other events that impact our business. If we are unable or fail to adequately maintain our manufacturing capacity or quality control processes, we could lose customers and there could be a material adverse impact on our market share and our ability to generate revenue.


We arehave been and most likely will continue to be subject to rapidly declining average selling prices, which may harm our revenue and gross profits.


Portable consumer electronics such as cellular phones and notebook computers are subject to rapid declines in average selling prices due to rapidly evolving technologies, industry standards and consumer preferences. As a result, manufacturers of these electronic devices expect us as suppliers to cut our costs and lower the price of our products in order to mitigate the negative impact on their own margins. We have reduced the price of our products in the past in order to meet market demand and expect to continue to face market-driven downward pricing pressures in the future. Our revenue and profitability will suffer if we are unable to offset any declines in our average selling prices by developing new or enhanced products with higher selling prices or gross profit margins, increasing our sales volumes or reducing our costs on a timely basis.


We did not have effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20072009 due to material weaknesses, which relate primarily to the disclosure and presentation of financial information under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. We have restated our consolidated financial statements three times.times due to such weaknesses. We can make no assurances that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. Our failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in material misstatements in our financial statements which could require us to restate financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and have a negative effect on our stock price.


In the course of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”),SEC review of registration statements on Form SB-2 (File Nos. 333-122209 and 333-130247), we restated our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004, our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, our consolidated statements of cash flows and our consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, and also extended or modified certain notes to these consolidated financial statements. This restatement arose out of accounting errors relating to (1) misclassification of cash transactions, (2) incorrect charging to our statements of income and comprehensive income for fiscal 2003 and 2004 for the deficit attributable to 1,152,456 shares outstanding prior to our reverse acquisition on January 20, 2005, and (3) incorrect presentation of depreciation expenses in the statement of income and comprehensive income. The restatement resulted in an increase in net cash from financing activities, a decrease in the number of shares of common stock outstanding and a corresponding increase in paid-in capital, and a decrease in gross profit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 by $1,635,971, or approximately 11%.

27



In the course of the SEC review of the registration statements referred to above, we determined that beginning with fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, we would no longer be considered a “small business issuer.” We restated our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, our consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income and our consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2005 to reflect the prospective adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” or SFAS 123R,123(R), as superseded by SFAS No. 168 “The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”, or SFAS No. 168, now included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, relating to the accounting for stock-based compensation commencing in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2006. Pursuant to the restatement, we incurred an incremental share-based compensation expense of $711,512 in the quarter ended December 31, 2005. This restatement resulted in, among other things, a decrease in gross profit and net income per share for the first quarter of our fiscal year 2006.


As reported in the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2006, we changed our independent registered public accounting firm from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP to KPMG. We engaged KPMG on May 15, 2006 to audit our financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005. During the course of the audit, KPMG notified our accounting staff of misstatements in our previously reported financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005 that required correction relating to: (1) the overstatement of interest expense because of an error in the application of accounting principles relating to interest capitalization, and the related understatement of property, plant and equipment, construction in progress and depreciation expenses; (2) the incorrect charging to shareholders’ equity for fiscal year 2005 of the provision for staff and workers’ bonus and welfare fund instead of charging it to the statements of income and comprehensive income; (3) the overstatement of the provision for contributions to a social insurance plan because of a misinterpretation of the applicable PRC laws; (4) the understatement of our accumulated foreign-currency translation adjustment for fiscal 2005 included in comprehensive income and overstatement of our additional paid-in capital due to a calculation error during consolidation; (5) other misstatements identified, which were individually not material, including amounts related to amortization of lease prepayments, prepayments and other receivables, accrued expenses and other payables, cost of revenues, general and administrative expenses, finance costs, other expenses, and certain cash flow items, and (6) the consequential understatements or overstatements of income tax expenses. The net restatement adjustments resulted in an increase in our net income and earnings per share in the relevant periods. For more detailed descriptions, see Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K”).

Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2006, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2006 Form 10-K. Our management also concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2007, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the “2007 Form 10-K”). Management believesbelieved that some appropriate measures havehad been implemented to remediate these weaknesses during the fiscal year 2007.2007, as described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2007 Form 10-K. However, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were still not effective as of September 30, 2008, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (the “2008 Form 10-K”). Investors are directed to Item 9A of the 2006 Form 10-K, the 2007 Form 10-K, and the 2008 Form 10-K for the description of these weaknesses.

the weaknesses identified for the corresponding fiscal year, and to Item 9A of the 2007 Form 10-K and Item 9A of the 2008 Form 10-K for the description of the measures that had been implemented during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

As disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007, as amended on April 11, 2007 and April 17, 2007, on March 28, 2007 we dismissed KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm and appointed PKF as our independent registered public accounting firm, in each case effective April 1, 2007.

Our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 20072009 covered by our Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. We have identified the following material weaknesses as of September 30, 2007:


1.Entity Level Material Weakness - Control Environment

We2009:

28


  • The Company did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting processesprocess due to an insufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAPgenerally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) commensurate with ourthe Company’s financial requirements. Additionally, ourthe Company’s senior management lacked an adequate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP, and did not implement adequate and proper supervisory review to ensure the consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and with SEC requirements.

28


2.Process Level Material Weakness - Procedures and transactions

Werequirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

  • The Company did not maintain adequate procedures to properly accounteffective controls over the accounting for deferred taxes under U.S. GAAP.construction in progress assets and the determination of depreciation expenses when the assets are ready for their intended use. Specifically, wethe Company did not have effective controls to track and procedures overassess the identificationready-for-intended-use status of the construction in progress assets to ensure the construction in progress assets being transferred to property, plant and measurement of differences between the respective tax and financial reporting bases of certain assets and liabilitiesequipment and the determinationrelated commencement of the applicable income tax rate to ensure that deferred taxes were accurately presenteddepreciation expense was in our consolidated financial statements. This material weakness resulted in a material adjustment to our preliminary consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2007. The need for this adjustment was initially identified by our external auditor and subsequently implemented by our management.


  • accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    See Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” for a more detailed discussion of these material weaknesses.


    We can make no assurances that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement required new or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result in additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses, cause us to fail to meet our periodic reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The existence of a material weakness could result in errors in our financial statements that could result in another restatement of financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, leading to a decline in our stock price.


    Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and the trading price of our common stock.


    We are subject to the reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The SEC, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on such companies’ internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports that contain an assessment by management of the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting at a reasonable assurance level. In addition, pursuant to Auditing Standard No. 2, which is in effect for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007,5, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as well as the operating effectiveness of the company’sCompany’s internal controls. These requirements first applied to us in connection with the Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.2006 Form 10-K. Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set out in Item 9A “Controls and Procedures.” of the 2006 Form 10-K.


    Management has determined that, as of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007,2009, the two material weaknesses as described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures,” resulted from material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. To remediate these material weaknesses, we have taken and will continue to take a number of remediation measures, as described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures.” However, we can make no assurances that we can fully remediate all our material weaknesses or address additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies that may subsequently arise by the year end date of fiscal year 2008,2010, so that our management will be able to conclude that we will have effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008.2010. If we cannot implement the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our registered independent public accounting firm may not be able to provide a written attestation as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, in which event, our registered independent public accounting firm may issue a disclaimer of their audit opinion. Our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting may result in sanctions or investigations by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, and loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could harm our business and negatively impact the trading price of our common stock. Furthermore, we anticipate that we will continue to incur considerable costs and use significant management and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 and other requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    29



    We became a public company through our acquisition by a non-operating public shell company, where we were the accounting acquirer and assumed all liabilities of our predecessor entity.

    Our January 2005 share exchange with Medina Coffee, Inc. was accounted for as a reverse acquisition in which Shenzhen BAK was deemed to be the accounting acquirer and Medina Coffee, which was originally incorporated in 1999, was deemed to be the legal acquirer. Accordingly, we have assumed all the liabilities of Medina Coffee. Medina Coffee was incorporated for the purposes of engaging in the retail coffee business and at the time of the share exchange, Medina Coffee had no substantial operations, assets or liabilities. We cannot guarantee that we will not become subject to any liabilities related to the conduct by Medina Coffee of its business prior to its acquisition by us that may subsequently arise.

    We are dependent on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues and this dependence is likely to continue.


    We have been dependent on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue. Our top five customers accounted for approximately 39.9%37.1%, 42.3%24.1%, and 37.1%27.9% of our revenues in the years ended September 30, 2005, 2006,2007, 2008, and 2007,2009, respectively. Dependence on a few customers could make it difficult to negotiate attractive prices for our products and could expose us to the risk of substantial losses if a single dominant customer stops purchasing our products. We expect that a limited number of customers will continue to contribute to a significant portion of our sales in the near future. Our ability to maintain close relationships with these top customers is essential to the growth and profitability of our business. If we fail to sell our products to one or more of these top customers in any particular period, or if a large customer purchases fewer of our products, defers orders or fails to place additional orders with us, or if we fail to develop additional major customers, our revenue could decline, and our results of operations could be adversely affected. A small number of prismatic cell customers and A123Systems have historically accounted for a substantial portion of our revenues. In the year ended September 30, 2007, sales to A123Systems accounted for 14% of our revenues. In the same period, our top five customers in aggregate contributed to approximately 37.1% of our revenues. Our agreement with A123Systems, as amended on August 18, 2005, terminated in accordance with its terms on August 30, 2007. As we expand our product portfolio and target new market segments, our customer composition as well as the identity and concentration of our top customers are expected to change from period to period. OurThe termination of our agreement with A123Systems as amended on August 18, 2005, terminateddid not materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation during the 2008 fiscal year or 2009 fiscal year, and in accordance with its terms on August 30, 2007. Ifthe future we expect that increases in our sales of aluminum cases, cylindrical cells and polymer cells will more than offset the loss of revenues from A123Systems. However, if we fail to find alternative sources of demand for our lithium-phosphate cells, our revenue may be substantially impacted.


    In addition, according to the terms set out in one of our credit facility agreements, if our monthly revenue for any given month is 10% lower than the monthly revenue for the corresponding month of the preceding year, the outstanding loans under this credit facility, including interests and penalties thereunder, will accelerate and become immediately due and payable.

    We do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, which may result in significant uncertainties and volatility with respect to our revenue from period to period.


    We do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers and the term of our sales contracts with our customers is typically one year. Furthermore, these contracts leave certain major terms such as price and quantity of products open to be determined in each purchase order. These contracts also allow parties to re-adjust the contract price for substantial changes in market conditions. As a result, if our customers hold stronger bargaining power than us or the market conditions are in their favor, we may not be able to enjoy the price downside protection or upside gain. Furthermore, our customers may decide not to continue placing purchase orders with us in the future at the same level as in prior periods. As a result, our results of operations may vary from period to period and may fluctuate significantly in the future.


    We may not be able to accurately plan our production based on our sales contracts, which may result in excess product inventory or product shortages.


    Our sales contracts typically provide for a non-binding, three-month forecast on the quantity of products that our customers may purchase from us. We typically have only a 15-day lead time to manufacture products to meet our customers’ requirements once our customers place orders with us. To meet the short delivery deadline, we generally make significant decisions on our production level and timing, procurement, facility requirements, personnel needs and other resources requirements based on our estimate in light of this forecast, our past dealings with such customers, market conditions and other relevant factors. Our customers’ final purchase orders may not be consistent with our estimates. If the final purchase orders substantially differ from our estimates, we may have excess product inventory or product shortages. Excess product inventory could result in unprofitable sales or write-offs as our products are susceptible to obsolescence and price declines. Producing additional products to make up for any product shortages within a short time frame may be difficult, making us unable to fill out the purchase orders. In either case, our results of operation would fluctuate from period to period.

    30



    We may face impairment charges if economic environments in which our businesses operate and key economic and business assumptions substantially change.


    Assessment of the potential impairment of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets is an integral part of our normal ongoing review of operations. Testing for potential impairment of long-lived assets is dependent on numerous assumptions and reflects our best estimates at a particular point in time, which may vary from testing date to testing date. The economic environments in which our businesses operate and key economic and business assumptions with respect to projected product selling prices and materials costs, market growth and inflation rates, can significantly affect the outcome of impairment tests. Estimates based on these assumptions may differ significantly from actual results. Changes in factors and assumptions used in assessing potential impairments can have a significant impact on both the existence and magnitude of impairments, as well as the time at which such impairments are recognized. Future changes in the economic environment and the economic outlook for the assets being evaluated could also result in impairment charges. Any significant asset impairments would adversely impact our financial results.


    We depend on third parties to supply key raw materials and components to us. Failure to obtain a sufficient supply of these raw materials and components in a timely fashion and at reasonable costs could significantly delay our production and shipments, which would cause us to breach our sales contracts with our customers.


    We purchase from Chinese domestic suppliers certain key raw materials and components such as electrolytes, electrode materials and import separators, a key component of battery cells from foreign countries. We purchase raw materials and components on the basis of purchase orders. In the absence of firm and long-term contracts, we may not be able to obtain sufficient supply of these raw materials and components from our existing suppliers or alternates in a timely fashion or at a reasonable cost. Our failure to secure sufficient supply of key raw materials and components in a timely fashion would result in a significant delay in our production and shipments, which may cause us to breach our sales contracts with our customers. Furthermore, failure to obtain sufficient supply of these raw materials and components at a reasonable cost could also harm our revenue and gross profit margins.


    Fluctuations in prices and availability of raw materials, particularly lithium cobalt dioxide, could increase our costs or cause delays in shipments, which would adversely impact our business and results of operations.


    Our operating results could be adversely affected by increases in the cost of raw materials, particularly lithium cobalt dioxide, the primary cost component of our battery products, or other product parts or components. Lithium cobalt dioxide mainly consists of cobalt. Cobalt market prices averaged $17.9$27.20 per pound in fiscal year 2005, $16.32007, $41.60 per pound in fiscal year 20062008, and $27.2$34.9 per pound in fiscal year 2007.2009. Cobalt traded as high as $32.0$58.1 per pound on March 30, 2007.October 8, 2008. The increase in cobalt’s market price has negatively impacted our financial results in recent years. We historically have not been able to fully offset the effects of higher costs of raw materials through price increases to customers or by way of productivity improvements.


    Fuel costs have also increased significantly in recent months. Our results of operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to pass along price increases to address higher fuel costs related to the distribution of products from our warehouses and distribution centers to our customers.

    31


    A significant increase in the price of one or more raw materials, parts or components or the inability to successfully implement price increases / surcharges to mitigate such cost increases could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.


    We face intense competition from other battery cell manufacturers, many of which have significantly greater resources.


    The market for battery cells used for portable electronic devices such as cellular phones is intensely competitive and is characterized by frequent technological changes and evolving industry standards. We expect competition to become more intense. Increased competition may result in decline in average selling prices, causing a decrease in gross profit margins. We have faced and will continue to face competition from manufacturers of traditional rechargeable battery cells, such as nickel-cadmium batteries, from manufacturers of rechargeable battery cells of more recent technologies, such as nickel-metal hydride and liquid electrolyte, other manufacturers of lithium-ion battery cells, as well as from companies engaged in the development of batteries incorporating new technologies. Other manufacturers of lithium-ion battery cells currently include Sanyo Electric Co., Sony Corporation, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (Panasonic), GS Group, NEC Corporation, Hitachi Ltd., LG Chemical Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., BYD Co. Ltd., Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint Stock Co., Ltd., Henan Huanyu Group, and Harbin Coslight Technology International Group Co., Ltd.

    31


    , Amperex Technology Limited and E-one Moli Energy (Canada) Limited.

    Many of these existing competitors have greater financial, personnel, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and other resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be in a stronger position to respond quickly to market opportunities, new or emerging technologies and evolving industry standards. Many of our competitors are developing a variety of battery technologies, such as lithium polymer and fuel cell batteries, which are expected to compete with our existing product line. Other companies undertaking R&D activities of solid-polymer lithium-ion batteries have developed prototypes and are constructing commercial scale production facilities. It is possible that our competitors will be able to introduce new products with more desirable features than ours and their new products will gain market acceptance. If our competitors successfully do so, we may not be able to maintain our competitive position and our future success would be materially and adversely affected.


    We depend on third-party battery pack manufacturers to incorporate our products into battery packs to make batteries ready for use in various portable consumer electronics. If these factories fail to properly assemble our products and battery packs, resulting in defective battery cells, our reputation could be severely damaged and our sales could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, our battery technology may only be commercially viable as a component of other companies' products, and these companies may choose not to include our systems in their products.


    We manufacture only battery cells, the key component of a battery. Battery cells need to be incorporated into battery packs to constitute batteries ready for use in various portable consumer electronics. Some of our end application customers may ask us to designate certain third-party battery pack manufacturers to assemble our products into batteries. While assembly is a fairly straightforward process as it does not involve complex technologies, the batteries could malfunction unless assembled properly. If the battery pack manufacturers with whom we cooperate fail to assemble batteries properly and cause a large number of batteries to be defective due to reasons unrelated to the quality of our products, our reputation could be severely damaged. In addition, if these battery pack manufacturers are unable to assemble a sufficient number of batteries to meet the requirements of our end application customers and we cannot timely find qualified alternative battery pack manufacturers, our sales could be materially and adversely affected.


    To be commercially viable, our batteries must be integrated in most cases into products manufactured by other companies. These other companies may not be able to manufacture appropriate products or, if they do manufacture such products, may choose not to use our technology. Any integration, design, manufacturing or marketing problems encountered by companies using our products could adversely affect the market for our products and our financial results. Any perceived problem while conducting demonstrations of our batteries could hurt our reputation and the reputation of our products, which could impede the development of our business.


    32


    We have demonstrated our battery technology in the past and we plan to conduct additional demonstrations in public and in private in the future. We also expect our customers to conduct field testing and pilot programs to evaluate products which utilize our technology. Although to date we have not experienced significant problems in demonstration or testing, future demonstrations and testing could encounter problems for a number of reasons, including the failure of our technology, the failure of the technology of others, the failure to combine these technologies properly and the failure to maintain and service the test systems properly. Many of these potential problems and delays are beyond our control. In addition, field test programs, by their nature, involve delays and modifications. Any problem or perceived problem with our field tests could hurt our reputation and the reputation of our products, which could impede the development of our business.


    Our business depends substantially on the continuing efforts of our senior executives and other key personnel, and our business may be severely disrupted if we lost their services.


    Our future success heavily depends on the continued service of our senior executives and other key employees. In particular, we rely on the expertise and experience of our chief executive officer and president, Mr. Xiangqian Li, and our chief operating officer and chief technical officer, Dr. Huanyu Mao.Mao, our chief financial officer, Mr. Tony Shen, or our chief operating officer, Mr. Kenneth Broom. If one or more of our senior executives are unable or unwilling to continue to work for us in their present positions, we may have to spend a considerable amount of time and resources searching, recruiting and integrating the replacements into our operations, which would substantially divert management’s attention from our business and severely disrupt our business. This may also adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy. Moreover, if any of our senior executives joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we may lose customers, suppliers, know-how and key personnel. Each of our executive officers has entered into an employment agreement with us, which contains non-competition and confidentiality clauses. However, if any dispute arises between our executive officers and the Company, it is hard to predict the extent to which any of these agreements could be enforced in China, where these executive officers reside (other than Mr. Broom, who resides in Canada), in light of the uncertainties with China’s legal system.

    32


    The success of our business depends on our ability to attract, train and retain highly skilled employees and key personnel.


    Because of the highly specialized, technical nature of our business, we must attract, train and retain a sizable workforce comprising highly skilled employees and other key personnel. Since our industry is characterized by high demand and intense competition for talent, we may have to pay higher salaries and wages and provide greater benefits in order to attract and retain highly skilled employees or other key personnel that we will need to achieve our strategic objectives. As we are still a relatively young company and our business has grown rapidly, our ability to train and integrate new employees into our operations may not meet the requirements of our growing business. Our failure to attract, train or retain highly skilled employees and other key personnel in numbers that are sufficient to satisfy our needs would materially and adversely affect our business.


    Manufacturing or use of our products may cause accidents, which could result in significant production interruption, delay or claims for substantial damages.


    Due to the high energy density inherent in lithium-based batteries, our batteries can pose certain safety risks, including the risk of fire. Although we incorporate safety procedures in the research, development, manufacture and transportation of batteries that are designed to minimize safety risks, the manufacture or use of our products may still cause accidents. Any accident, whether occurring at the manufacturing facilities or from the use of our products, may result in significant production interruption, delays or claims for substantial damages caused by personal injuries or property damages.


    We extend relatively long payment terms to our customers.


    As is customary in the industry in the PRC, we extend relatively long payment terms and provide generous return policies to our customers. As a result of the size of many of our orders, these extended terms may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to fund our operations out of our operating cash flow. In addition, although we attempt to establish appropriate reserves for our receivables, those reserves may not prove to be adequate in view of actual levels of bad debts. The failure of our customers to pay us timely would negatively affect our working capital, which could in turn adversely affect our cash flow.


    33


    Our customers often place large orders for products, requiring fast delivery, which impacts our working capital. If our customers do not incorporate our products into their products and sell them in a timely fashion, for example, due to excess inventories, sales slowdowns or other issues, they may not pay us in a timely fashion, even on our extended terms. Our customers’ failure to pay may force us to defer or delay further product orders, which may adversely affect our cash flows, sales or income in subsequent periods.


    We manufacture and market lithium-based battery cells only. If a viable substitute product or chemistry emerges and gains market acceptance, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.


    We manufacture and market lithium-based battery cells only. As we believe that the market for lithium-based batteries has good growth potential, we have focused our R&D activities on exploring new chemistry and formula to enhance our product quality and features while reducing cost. Some of our competitors are conducting R&D on alternative battery technologies, such as fuel cells. If any viable substitute product emerges and gains market acceptance because it has more enhanced features, more power, more attractive pricing, or better reliability, the market demand for our products may be reduced, and accordingly our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

    33


    We face risks associated with the marketing, distribution and sale of our products internationally, and if we are unable to effectively manage these risks, they could impair our ability to expand our business abroad.


    In the years ended September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, we derived 32.8%28.6% and 27.6%37.2% respectively of our sales from outside the PRC. The marketing, international distribution and sale of our products expose us to a number of risks, including:


    fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
    difficulty in engaging and retaining distributors that are knowledgeable about, and can function effectively in, overseas markets;
    increased costs associated with maintaining marketing efforts in various countries;
    difficulty and cost relating to compliance with the different commercial and legal requirements of the overseas markets in which we offer our products;
    inability to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights; and
    trade barriers such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of our products and make us less competitive in some countries.

    • fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

    • difficulty in engaging and retaining distributors that are knowledgeable about, and can function effectively in, overseas markets;

    • increased costs associated with maintaining marketing efforts in various countries;

    • difficulty and cost relating to compliance with the different commercial and legal requirements of the overseas markets in which we offer our products;

    • inability to obtain, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights; and

    • trade barriers such as export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other restrictions and expenses, which could increase the prices of our products and make us less competitive in some countries.

    We rely on third parties whose operations are outside our control.


    We rely on arrangements with third-party shippers and carriers such as independent shipping companies for timely delivery of our products to our customers. As a result, we may be subject to carrier disruptions and increased costs due to factors that are beyond our control, including labor strikes, inclement weather, natural disasters and rapidly increasing fuel costs. If the services of any of these third parties become unsatisfactory, we may experience delays in meeting our customers'customers’ product demands and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement on a timely basis or on commercially reasonable terms. Any failure to deliver products to our customers in a timely and accurate manner may damage our reputation and could cause us to lose customers.


    We also utilize third partythird-party distributors and manufacturer's representatives to sell, install and service certain of our products. While we are selective in whom we choose to represent us, it is difficult for us to ensure that our distributors and manufacturer's representatives consistently act in accordance with the standards we set for them. To the extent any of our end-customers have negative experiences with any of our distributors or manufacturer's representatives; it could reflect poorly on us and damage our reputation, thereby negatively impacting our financial results.


    34


    Defects in our products could result in a loss of customers and decrease in revenue, unexpected expenses and a loss of market share.


    We have purchased certain product liability insurance from some PRC-based insurance companies to provide against any claims against us based on our product quality. If any of our products is found to have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, we will be required to accept returns, provide replacement,replacements, provide refund,refunds, or pay damages. As our insurance policy imposes a ceiling for maximum coverage and high deductibles, we may not be able to obtain from our insurance policy ana sufficient amount enough to compensate our customers for damages they suffered attributable to the quality of our products. Moreover, as our insurance policy also excludes certain types of claims from its coverage, and if any of our customers’ claims against us falls into those exclusions, we would not receive any amount from our insurance policy at all. In either case, we may still be required to incur substantial amounts to indemnify our customers in respect of their product quality claims against us, which would materially and adversely affect the results of our operations and severely damage our reputation.

    34


    We are subject to a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States involving our production of battery cells for A123Systems for use in cordless power tools. If the court holds against us, we may be required to pay monetary damages, terminate our production of the cells, or pay royalties to continue the production. This would in turn materially adversely affect our ability to execute our growth strategy, revenues and business prospects.


    On September 12, 2006, Hydro-Quebec, a Canadian company, and the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System brought a federal patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against us. The plaintiffs alleged that by manufacturing rechargeable lithium cells for A123Systems for use in DeWalt 36-volt cordless power tools manufactured by Black & Decker, we have infringed two U.S. patents owned by and exclusively licensed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and damages in an unspecified amount. A123Systems, Black & Decker Corporation and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. have also been named as co-defendants in this lawsuit. The court has not ruled on this lawsuit. We understand that this lawsuit is a countersuit against A123Systems, which filed a claim against Hydro-Quebec in the United States District Court of Massachusetts in April 2006. In that suit, A123Systems sought declaratory relief that the two said U.S. patents are invalid and that A123Systems is not infringing either of these two patents.


    Following the filing of the lawsuit, the United States Patent and Trademark Office reexamined the patents. The patents were re-issued with substantial modification of the patent claims. The plaintiffs have advised that, in their view, the lawsuit continues to be viable against the defendants, including China BAK. The plaintiffs' position has not been tested. Currently pending is the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint to take the USPTO action into account.

    If the court holds against us, we may be requiredwere to pay plaintiffsissue an adverse decision, the Company could face a substantial monetary damages and be prohibitedaward. While such an adverse decision could also prohibit the Company from furtherfuture production of rechargeable lithium cells manufactured for A123Systems to be used in Black & Decker power tools or be requiredmay require the Company to pay royalties to engage in any such production. Accordingly, our revenuesproduction, the Company has no plans to pursue production of batteries for A123. The court has not issued any substantive decisions in the litigation and business prospects couldthere has been no substantive pretrial discovery. As a result, at this time, the Company is unable to express a view on the extent of any possible award of damages that might be materially and adversely affected. In addition, regardless ofrendered in the final outcome of the lawsuit, we may incur substantial costs and our management resource and attention to our business would be diverted.


    litigation.

    We may be exposed to infringement or misappropriation claims by third parties, which, if determined adversely to us, could cause our loss of significant rights and inability to continue providing our existing product offerings.


    Our success also depends largely on our ability to use and develop our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to lithium-ion battery technology patents involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analysis and, therefore, may be highly expensive and time-consuming. If there is a successful claim of infringement against us, we may be required to pay substantial damages to the party claiming infringement, develop non-infringing technologies or enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be available at acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure to develop non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis would harm our business. Protracted litigation could result in our customers, or potential customers, deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution of such litigation. Parties making the infringement claim may also obtain an injunction that can prevent us from selling our products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing contents. Any intellectual property litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition.


    35


    Other future litigation could impact our financial results and condition.


    Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be affected by other significant future litigation or claims adverse to us. Types of potential litigation cases include: product liability, contract, employment-related, labor relations, personal injury or property damage, intellectual property, stockholder claims and claims arising from any injury or damage to persons, property or the environment from hazardous substances used, generated or disposed of in the conduct of our business (or that of a predecessor to the extent we are not indemnified for those liabilities).


    We may not be able to prevent others from unauthorized use of our intellectual property, or others may challenge our intellectual property rights,, which could harm our business and competitive position.


    We rely on a combination of patent, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements to protect our intellectual property rights. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we owned 195344 registered patents in China and had 305573 pending patent applications in China. We had 4632 registered trademarks in China that cover various categories of goods and services. Some of our trademarks, such as BAK, are also29 registered trademarks in the United States, European Union, Korea, Russia, Taiwan and Hong Kong.Kong that cover various categories of goods and services. We can make no assurances that all the pending patent applications will result in issue of patents or, if issued, that it will sufficiently protect our intellectual property rights. Nor can we make any assurances that any patent, trademark or other intellectual property rights that we have obtained may not be challenged by third parties. Implementation of PRC intellectual property-related laws has historically been lax, primarily because of ambiguities in the PRC laws and difficulties in enforcement. Accordingly, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in China may not be as effective as in the United States or other countries. Policing unauthorized use of proprietary technology is difficult and expensive. The steps we have taken may not be adequate to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights. Reverse engineering, unauthorized copying or other misappropriation of our proprietary technologies could enable third parties to benefit from our technologies without paying us any royalties. Though we are not currently involved in any litigation with respect to intellectual property, we may need to enforce our intellectual property rights through litigation.

    35

    36



    We do not hold the property ownership rights for facilities located in the PRC. We may lose some or all of the land use right for our BAK Industrial Park where our facilitiesrights that we have obtained. We are located, nor didcurrently required to pledge land use rights and property rights that we obtaindo not currently have or do not have the required construction and zoning permits for our manufacturing facilities and other related facilities situated on the land.


    requisite government approval to pledge.

    We currently do not hold the land use rightproperty ownership rights to at least one of the tracttracts of property on which we have constructed our new manufacturing facilities and other related facilities.facilities in the PRC. Under relevant PRC laws and regulations, because we previously did not have the land use right for the underlying land, we were not eligible to apply for the required property ownership right certificates and construction or zoning permits for the facilities we later built on the land, including our manufacturing facilities, and therefore we are not deemed to be the rightful owner for all these facilities. While we have been actively negotiating with the Shenzhen municipal government with a view to resolving this issue, we may not be able to purchasepurchased the land use rightrights and construction and zoning permits relating to the underlying land from the Shenzhen municipal government on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we manage to acquire the land use right,all of our facilities, we can make no assurances that we will not be subject to any fine or other penalty for our past non-compliance with construction and zoningthese requirements. If we are unsuccessful in acquiring the land use right,property ownership rights, we could be forced to halt our production, vacate our current premises, and lose all of our facilities situated on the land without any compensation, which would adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and our financial condition.


    Pursuant to our land use rights certificate relating to our Tianjin facility, the Tianjin government had requested that we complete construction of the Tianjin facility before September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, we have obtained an extension from the Business Administration Bureau of Beichen District, Tianjin, to make the remaining contribution of the registered capital by December 11, 2009, which we have interpreted as an extension of the completion date of construction to this date. If we fail to make the remaining contribution and complete the construction by the extension date or obtain approval for a further extension of the completion date from the relevant government bureau, there is a risk that the land use rights certificate relating to our Tianjin facility will become invalid. Should this occur, we could be forced to halt our production, vacate our current premises, and lose all of our facilities situated on the land without any compensation, which would adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and our financial condition.

    Pursuant to the property ownership and land use rights certificate that we obtained relating to the Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, we are required to complete at least 25% of the construction of the new Research and Development Test Centre facility by September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, the Shenzhen government has agreed to increase the dimensions of the Research and Development Test Centre and signed two supplement agreements with us. According to the supplement agreements, we are required to complete the construction by May 6, 2011. In addition, according to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, such land may not be pledged without the approval of the relevant government office. We are required to pledge our property ownership and land use rights certificate in relation to the new Research and Development Test Centre to China Development Bank pursuant to the loan agreement entered into with it. As of September 30, 2009, we were in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the requisite approval. In addition, the so-named “property ownership and land use rights certificate” relating to this facility that we were issued lacks certain terms relating to property ownership rights, which appears to indicate that the granting government has so far only granted us the relevant land use rights. As a result, this certificate may not be adequate evidence of our property ownership rights to this property. We anticipate that the government will re-grant this certificate with adequate property ownership indicia after we have satisfied the above construction requirement and followed certain procedures. If we have misinterpreted our agreement with the Shenzhen government or our application for a reissued certificate with property ownership rights proves unsuccessful, we could be forced to halt our production, vacate our current premises, lose all of our facilities situated on the land without any compensation, and/or be considered in breach of our loan agreement with China Development Bank, any of which would adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and our financial condition.

    As of September 30, 2009, we have insurance for all of the buildings located at our BAK Industrial Park facility and owned by Shenzhen BAK, which constitute all of our PRC-based facilities in Shenzhen. We also had insurance for our facilities at Tianjin, PRC. We did not have insurance for our R&D Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen.

    37


    Compliance with environmental regulations can be expensive, and our failure to comply with these regulations may result in adverse publicity and a material adverse effect on our business.


    As a manufacturer, we are subject to various PRC environmental laws and regulations on air emission, waste water discharge, solid waste and noise. Although we believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with current environmental laws and regulations, we may not be able to comply with these regulations at all times as the PRC environmental legal regime is evolving and becoming more stringent. Therefore, if the PRC government imposes more stringent regulations in the future, we will have to incur additional substantial costs and expenses in order to comply with new regulations, which may negatively affect our results of operations. If we fail to comply with any of the present or future environmental regulations in material aspects, we may suffer from negative publicity and may be required to pay substantial fines, suspend or even cease operations. Failure to comply with PRC environmental laws and regulations may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


    To the extent we ship our products outside of the PRC, or to the extent our products are used in products sold outside of the PRC, they may be affected by the following: The transportation of non-rechargeable and rechargeable lithium batteries is regulated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and corresponding International Air Transport Association (IATA), Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Dangerous Goods Regulations and the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG), and in the PRC by General Administration of Civil Aviation of China and Maritime Safety Administration of People’s Republic of China. These regulations are based on the United Nations (UN) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Model Regulations and the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria. We currently ship our products pursuant to ICAO, IATA and PHMSA hazardous goods regulations. New regulations that pertain to all lithium battery manufacturers went into effect in 2003 and 2004, and additional regulations will go into effect inon October 1, 2009. The regulations require companies to meet certain testing, packaging, labeling and shipping specifications for safety reasons. We comply with all current PRC and international regulations for the shipment of our products, and will comply with any new regulations that are imposed. We have established our own testing facilities to ensure that we comply with these regulations. If we were unable to comply with the new regulations, however, or if regulations are introduced that limit our ability to transport our products to customers in a cost-effective manner, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


    We have significant short-term debt obligations, which mature in less than one year. Failure to extend those maturities of, or to refinance, that debt could result in defaults, and in certain instances, foreclosures on our assets. Moreover, we may be unable to obtain financing to fund ongoing operations and future growth.


    At September 30, 2007,2009, we had $89.9short-term bank loans of $139.2 million, long-term bank loans of short-term$16.1 million maturing within one year, long-term bank loans and $23.8of $39.6 million ofmaturing over one year, and bills payable maturing in less than one year,of $53.9 million, a substantial portion of which is secured by certain of our assets that amounted to $42.9$89.9 million. Our inventory, machinery and equipment worth $38.3$55.1 million secured the short-term bank loans and long-term bank loans, and our deposits worth $4.6$31.1 million secured thecertain bills payable.payable, construction payable and short-term bank loans. Failure to obtain extensions of the maturity dates of, or to refinance, these obligations or to obtain additional equity financing to meet these debt obligations would result in an event of default with respect to such obligations and could result in the foreclosure on the collateral. The sale of such collateral at foreclosure would significantly disrupt our ability to produce products for our customers in the quantities required by customer orders or deliver products in a timely fashion, which could significantly lower our revenues and profitability. We may be able to refinance or obtain extensions of the maturities of all or some of such debt only on terms that significantly restrict our ability to operate, including terms that place additional limitations on our ability to incur other indebtedness, to pay dividends, to use our assets as collateral for other financing, to sell assets or to make acquisitions or enter into other transactions. Such restrictions may adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or to engage in other business activities. If we finance the repayment of our outstanding indebtedness by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, such issuances could result in substantial dilution to our stockholders.

    36


    While we believe that our revenue growth projections and our ongoing cost controls will allow us to generate cash and achieve profitability in the foreseeable future, there is no assurance as to when or if we will be able to achieve our projections. Our future cash flows from operations, combined with our accessibility to cash and credit, may not be sufficient to allow us to finance ongoing operations or to make required investments for future growth. We may need to seek additional credit or access capital markets for additional funds. There is no assurance that we would be successful in this regard.


    38


    We have limited insurance coverage against damages or loss we might suffer.


    The insurance industry in China is still in an early stage of development and business interruption insurance available in China offers limited coverage compared to that offered in many developed countries. We do not carry business interruption insurance and therefore any business disruption or natural disaster could result in substantial damages or losses to us. In addition, there are certain types of losses (such as losses from forces of nature) that are generally not insured because either they are uninsurable or insurance cannot be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, our business could be materially adversely affected. Further,As of September 30, 2009, we have not been able to insure anyinsurance for all of the buildings located at our BAK Industrial Park facility and owned by Shenzhen BAK, which constitute all of our manufacturingPRC-based facilities since wein Shenzhen. We also had insurance for our facilities at Tianjin, PRC. We did not have not yet received the applicable land use rights certificate.insurance for our R&D Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen. If we were to suffer any losses or damages to any uninsured facilities, or if our manufacturing facilities,insurance does not cover any losses or damages that occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.


    Risks Related to Doing Business in China


    Adverse changes in the political and economic policies of the PRC government could have a material adverse effect onimpede the overall economic growth of China, which could reduce the demand for our products and materially and adversely affectdamage our competitive position.


    Allbusiness.

    We conduct substantially all of our business operations are conducted in China and a significant portiongenerate most of our sales are maderevenue in China. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects are affected significantly by economic, political and legal developments in China. The ChinesePRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including:


    the amount

    • a higher level of government involvement;

    • an early stage of development of government involvement;

    the level of development;
    the growth rate;
    the control of foreign exchange; and
    the allocation of resources.

    While the Chinesemarket-oriented sector of the economy;

  • a rapid growth rate;

  • a higher level of control over foreign exchange; and

  • the allocation of resources.

  • As the PRC economy has grown significantly inbeen transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy, the past 20 years, the growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some ofWhile these measures may benefit the overall ChinesePRC economy, butthey may also may have a negative effect on us. We cannot predict

    Although the future directionPRC government has in recent years implemented measures emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reformsreform, the PRC government continues to exercise significant control over economic growth in China through the allocation of resources, controlling the payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and imposing policies that impact particular industries or the effects such measures may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

    37


    companies in different ways.

    Any adverse change in economic conditions inor government policies or in laws and regulations in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth in China, which in turn could lead to a reduction in demand for our products and consequently have a material adverse effect on our business.


    A substantial amountbusiness and prospects.

    39


    Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could limit the legal protections available to you and us.

    We conduct substantially all of our materials sourcing originatesbusiness through our operating subsidiaries in China. WeOur operating subsidiaries are generally subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investments in China and, in particular, laws applicable to FIEs. The PRC legal system is based on written statutes, and prior court decisions may be unablecited for reference, but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, a series of new PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to enforce our legal rights due to policies regarding the regulationvarious forms of foreign investments in China as well as other aspects ofChina. However, since the Chinese legal system.


    Unlike the common law system prevalent in the United States, the PRC’sPRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes, in which system decided legal cases have little value as precedents. The PRC does not have a well-developed, consolidated bodycontinues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, governing foreign investment enterprises. As a result, the administration of laws and regulations by government agencies are subject to considerable discretion and variation on the part of the PRC government, including its courts, and may be subject to influence by external forces unrelated to the legal merits of a particular matter. China’s regulations and policies with respect to foreign investmentsrules are evolving. Definitivenot always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and policies with respect to such matters as the permissible percentage of foreign investmentrules involve uncertainties for you and permissible rates of equity returns have not yet been published. As a result, we may not be aware of any violations of these policies and rules until some time after the violation. Statements regarding these evolving policies have been conflicting and any such policies, as administered, are likely to be subject to broad interpretation and discretion and to be modified, perhaps on a case-by-case basis. The uncertainties regarding such regulations and policies present risks that may affect our ability to achieve our business objectives. If we are unable to enforce any legal rights we may have under our contracts or otherwise, our ability to compete with other companies in our industry could be materially and negatively affected.us. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial costcosts and diversion of resources and management attention. The relative inexperience

    If we are found to have failed to comply with applicable laws, we may incur additional expenditures or be subject to significant fines and penalties.

    Our operations are subject to PRC laws and regulations applicable to us. However, many PRC laws and regulations are uncertain in their scope, and the implementation of China's judiciarysuch laws and regulations in different localities could have significant differences. In certain instances, local implementation rules and/or the actual implementation are not necessarily consistent with the regulations at the national level. Although we strive to comply with all the applicable PRC laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government authorities will not later determine that we have not been in compliance with certain laws or regulations.

    In addition, our facilities and products are subject to many cases creates additional uncertaintylaws and regulations. Our failure to comply with these and other applicable laws and regulations in China could subject us to administrative penalties and injunctive relief, as well as civil remedies, including fines, injunctions and recalls of our products. It is possible that changes to the outcome of any litigation. It may also be difficult to obtainsuch laws or more rigorous enforcement of such laws or with respect to our current or past practices could have a judgment by a court of another jurisdictionmaterial adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Further, additional environmental, health or safety issues relating to matters that are not currently known to management may result in China.


    unanticipated liabilities and expenditures.

    We currently enjoy a reduced tax rate and other government incentives, and the loss of or reduction in these benefits may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.


    According to relevant PRC laws

    Shenzhen BAK and regulations, an enterprise locatedBAK Electronics are both registered and operate in Shenzhen, including the district where wePRC, and are currently located,each recognized as “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Special Economic Zone”. As a result, they have been entitled to a preferential enterprise income tax rate of 15%. In accordance with the relevant income tax laws, the profits of Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics were fully exempted from income tax for two years from the first profitable calendar year of operations after offset of accumulated taxable losses, followed by a 50% exemption for the immediate next three calendar years (“tax holiday”).

    The tax holiday of Shenzhen BAK commenced in 2002, the first calendar year in which Shenzhen BAK had assessable profit, and ended on December 31, 2006. In addition, due to additional capital contributed by BAK International to Shenzhen BAK in both 2005 and 2006 and Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as an advanced technology enterprise in 2007 and 2008, Shenzhen BAK was granted a preferential income tax rate of 7.5%, 11.8% and 12.6% for calendar years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In accordance with the transition period of the new corporate income tax law (the “New CIT Law”) and before considering the above-mentioned tax concessions, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rate for calendar years 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to aan income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rates after consideration of its tax concessions are expected to be 15% for both calendar years 2010 and 2011, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%.

    BAK Electronics, established in August 2005, has been eligible for the same preferential tax treatment previously applicable to Shenzhen BAK and was in the tax holiday and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax. According to PRC lawstax for calendar years 2006 and regulations on foreign invested enterprises, a foreign invested manufacturing enterprise is entitled to, starting from its first profitable year, a two-year exemption from its enterprise income tax2007 followed by a three-year 50% reduction in its enterprise income tax rate. Our PRC subsidiaries, ShenzhenIn addition, pursuant to the transition period of the New CIT Law and before considering the above-mentioned 50% reduction, BAK and BAK Electronics, are each entitled to a two-year exemption from enterpriseElectronics’ income tax from its first profitablerates for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 20%, 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year and a reduced enterprise2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 7.5%25%. Therefore, BAK Electronics’ income tax rate after consideration of its tax holiday are expected to be 10%, 11% and 24% for the following three years. As such, for the first twocalendar years ended December 31, 2003, Shenzhen BAK was exempted from any enterprise income tax. Between January 1, 20042009, 2010 and December 31, 2006, Shenzhen BAK was2011, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to the enterprisean income tax rate of 7.5%25%. BAK Electronics established in August 2005, is eligible for the same preferential tax treatment that is applicable to Shenzhen BAK, and is currently in its tax holiday and fully exempt fromdid not incur any enterprise income tax. tax for the current year due to the current tax losses carried forward from the calendar year 2008.

    40


    BAK Tianjin is currently exempt from anypaying no enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.


    In addition, due to the additional capital invested in Shenzhen BAK in both 2005 and 2006, Shenzhen BAK was granted a preferential income tax rate of 3.309%, 3.82% and 6.12% in calendar years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

    However, the PRC government authorities could reduce or eliminate these incentives at any time in the future. There have been preliminary high-level discussions within the PRC on leveling the playing field between foreign invested enterprises and PRC domestic enterprises by phasing out preferential tax rates applicable to foreign invested enterprises. We cannot predict whether and when we may lose, in whole or in part, the preferential tax treatment and other incentives we have now. If we lose part or all of these preferential treatments, we would be subject to a normal enterprise tax rate. Any loss of or reduction in the preferential tax treatments we have received could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
    38


    We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our subsidiaries for our cash needs.


    We are a holding company, and we conduct all of our operations through our three subsidiaries in PRC: Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin, each a limited liability company established in China. We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash needs, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our stockholders, to service any debt we may incur and to pay our operating expenses. Current regulations in the PRC permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. According to the articles of association of our PRC subsidiaries, each of our PRC subsidiaries is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profit based on the PRC accounting standards and regulations each year to its enterprise development reserve, until the balance in the reserve reaches 50% of the registered capital of the company. Funds in the reserve are not distributable to us in forms of cash dividends, loans or advances. In addition, if our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us, which in turn will adversely affect our available cash.


    Governmental control of currency conversion may affect our ability to satisfy our non-RMB obligations.

    The PRC government imposes controls Any limitations on the convertibility of the RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive substantially all of our revenues in RMB. Under our current corporate structure, our income is primarily derived from dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries. Shortages in the availability of foreign currency may restrict the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to transfer funds to us could materially and adversely limit our affiliated entityability to remit sufficient foreign currencygrow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends or other paymentsand otherwise fund and conduct our business.

    Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to us, or otherwise satisfy their foreign currencyreceive and use our sales revenue effectively.

    Most of our sales revenue and expenses are denominated obligations.in RMB. Under existing PRC law, the RMB is currently convertible under the “current account,” which includes dividends and trade and service-related foreign exchange regulations, paymentstransactions, but not under the “capital account,” which includes foreign direct investment and loans. Currently, our PRC operating subsidiaries may purchase foreign currencies for settlement of current account items,transactions, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions, can be made in foreign currenciesof dividends to us, without priorthe approval fromof the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriatethe relevant PRC government authorities is required wheremay limit or eliminate our ability to purchase foreign currencies in the future. Since a significant amount of our future revenue will be denominated in RMB, isany existing and future restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out ofutilize revenue generated in RMB to fund our business activities outside China to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loansthat are denominated in foreign currencies. The

    Foreign exchange transactions by PRC operating subsidiaries under the capital account continue to be subject to significant foreign exchange controls and require the approval of or need to register with PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access inauthorities, including SAFE. In particular, if our PRC operating subsidiaries borrow foreign currency through loans from us or other foreign lenders, these loans must be registered with SAFE, and if we finance the futuresubsidiaries by means of additional capital contributions, these capital contributions must be approved by certain government authorities, including the Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, or their respective local counterparts. These limitations could affect their ability to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If theobtain foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy our currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our stockholders.


    through debt or equity financing.

    Fluctuation in the value of the RMB may result in foreign currency translation losses or in increased costs to us.


    The

    Although our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, the financial records of our operating subsidiaries are maintained in their local currency, the RMB, which is our functional currency. Approximately 62.9% of our revenues and 96.9% of our costs and expenses for the year ended September 30, 2009 are denominated in RMB, with the balance denominated in U.S. dollars. Approximately 99.6% of our assets excluding cash were denominated in RMB as of September 30, 2009. As a result, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk as our revenues and results of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and RMB. If the RMB depreciates against the U.S. dollar, the value of our RMB revenues, earnings and assets as expressed in our U.S. dollar financial statements will decline. Assets and liabilities of our operating subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, their equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rate and their income and expenses items are translated using the average rate for the period. Any resulting exchange differences are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. An average appreciation (depreciation) of the RMB against the U.S. dollar of 5% would increase (decrease) our comprehensive income by $8.8 million based on our outstanding revenues, costs and expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in RMB as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, our accumulated other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. On July 21, 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the RMB to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the RMB is permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. This change in policy has resultedcomprehensive income was $24.8 million. We have not entered into any hedging transactions in an approximately 9.3% appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar between July 21, 2005 and September 30, 2007. While the international reactioneffort to the RMB revaluation has generally been positive, there remains significant international pressure on the PRC governmentreduce our exposure to adopt an even more flexible currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar. Our revenues and costs are mostly denominated in the RMB, and a significant portion of our financial assets are also denominated in RMB. We rely entirely on dividends and other fees paid to us by our subsidiaries in China. Any significant revaluation of the RMB may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenues, earnings and financial position, and the value of, and any dividends payable on common stock in U.S. dollars. For example, an appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar would make any new RMB-denominated investments or expenditures more costly to us, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars into the RMB for such purposes. An appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar would also result in foreign currency translation losses for financial reporting purposes when we translate our U.S. dollar denominated financial assets into the RMB, as the RMB is our reporting currency.

    39
    exchange risk.

    41



    Failure to comply with PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents may subject our PRC resident stockholders to personal liability, limit our ability to acquire PRC companies or to inject capital into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us or otherwise materially adversely affect us.


    In October 2005, the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, issued the Notice on Relevant Issues in the Foreign Exchange Control over Financing and Return Investment Through Special Purpose Companies by Residents Inside China, generally referred to as Circular 75, which required PRC residents to register with the competent local SAFE branch before establishing or acquiring control over an offshore special purpose vehicle,company, or SPV, for the purpose of engaging in an equity financing outside of China on the strength of domestic PRC assets originally held by those residents. Internal implementing guidelines issued by SAFE, which became public in June 2007 (known as Notice 106), expanded the reach of Circular 75 by (i) purporting to cover the establishment or acquisition of control by PRC residents of offshore entities which merely acquire “control” over domestic companies or assets, even in the absence of legal ownership; (ii) adding requirements relating to the source of the PRC resident’s funds used to establish or acquire the offshore entity; (iii) covering the use of existing offshore entities for offshore financings; (iv) purporting to cover situations in which an offshore SPV establishes a new subsidiary in China or acquires an unrelated company or unrelated assets in China; and (v) making the domestic affiliate of the SPV responsible for the accuracy of certain documents which must be filed in connection with any such registration, notably, the business plan which describes the overseas financing and the use of proceeds. Amendments to registrations made under Circular 75 are required in connection with any increase or decrease of capital, transfer of shares, mergers and acquisitions, equity investment or creation of any security interest in any assets located in China to guarantee offshore obligations, and Notice 106 makes the offshore SPV jointly responsible for these filings. In the case of an SPV which was established, and which acquired a related domestic company or assets, before the implementation date of Circular 75, a retroactive SAFE registration was required to have been completed before March 31, 2006; this date was subsequently extended indefinitely by Notice 106, which also required that the registrant establish that all foreign exchange transactions undertaken by the SPV and its affiliates were in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Failure to comply with the requirements of Circular 75, as applied by SAFE in accordance with Notice 106, may result in fines and other penalties under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions. Any such failure could also could result in the SPV’s affiliates being impeded or prevented from distributing their profits and the proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the SPV, or from engaging in other transfers of funds into or out of China.


    We believe our stockholders who are PRC residents as defined in Circular 75 have registered with the relevant branch of SAFE, as currently required, in connection with their equity interests in us and our acquisitions of equity interests in our PRC subsidiaries. However, we cannot provide any assurances that their existing registrations have fully complied with, and that they have made all necessary amendments to their registration to fully comply with, all applicable registrations or approvals required by Circular 75. Moreover, because of uncertainty over how Circular 75 will be interpreted and implemented, and how or whether SAFE will apply it to us, we cannot predict how it will affect our business operations or future strategies. For example, our present and prospective PRC subsidiaries’ ability to conduct foreign exchange activities, such as the remittance of dividends and foreign currency-denominated borrowings, may be subject to compliance with Circular 75 by our PRC resident beneficial holders. In addition, such PRC residents may not always be able to complete the necessary registration procedures required by Circular 75. We also have little control over either our present or prospective direct or indirect stockholders or the outcome of such registration procedures. A failure by our PRC resident beneficial holders or future PRC resident stockholders to comply with Circular 75, if SAFE requires it, could subject these PRC resident beneficial holders to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.


    42


    The M&A Rule establishes more complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

    On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies, including the China Securities Regulatory Commission, promulgated the Provisions Regarding Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rule”), which became effective on September 8, 2006. The M&A Rule establishes additional procedures and requirements that could make some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex, including requirements in some instances that the PRC Ministry of Commerce be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction and in some situations, require approval of the PRC Ministry of Commerce when a foreign investor takes control of a Chinese domestic enterprise. The regulations prohibit a transaction at an acquisition price obviously lower than the appraised value of the PRC business or assets and in certain transaction structures, require that consideration must be paid within defined periods, generally not in excess of a year. The regulation also limits our ability to negotiate various terms of the acquisition, including aspects of the initial consideration, contingent consideration, holdback provisions, indemnification provisions and provisions relating to the assumption and allocation of assets and liabilities. Transaction structures involving trusts, nominees and similar entities are prohibited. Government approvals will have expiration dates by which a transaction must be completed and reported to the government agencies. In the future, we may grow our business in part by acquiring complementary businesses, although we do not have any plans to do so at this time. The M&A Rule also requires PRC Ministry of Commerce anti-trust review of any change-of-control transactions involving certain types of foreign acquirers. Complying with the requirements of the M&A Rule to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining approval from the PRC Ministry of Commerce, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business or maintain our market share.

    Investors may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing original actions in China based upon U.S. laws, including the federal securities laws or other foreign laws against us or our management.


    All of our current operations are conducted in China. Moreover, most of our current directors and officers are nationals or residents of China. All or a substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States and in the PRC. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States or elsewhere outside China upon these persons. In addition, uncertainty exists as to whether the courts of China would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or such officers and/or directors predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof, or be competent to hear original actions brought in China against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.

    40


    An outbreak of a pandemic avian influenza, SARSSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”), swine flu, or other contagious disease may have an adverse effect on the economies of certain Asian countries and may adversely affect our results of operations.


    During the past foursix years, large parts of Asia experienced unprecedented outbreaks of avian influenza caused by the H5N1 virus which, according to a report of the World Health Organization, or WHO, in 2004, “moved the world closer than any time since 1968 to an influenza pandemic with high morbidity, excess mortality and social and economic disruption.” Currently, no fully effective avian flu vaccines have been developed and there is evidence that the H5N1 virus is evolving and an effective vaccine may not be discovered in time to protect against the potential avian flu pandemic. In the first half of 2003, certain countries in Asia experienced an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, a highly contagious form of atypical pneumonia, which seriously interrupted the economic activities and the demand for goods plummeted in the affected regions. Additionally, during April and May 2009, there have been outbreaks of highly pathogenic swine flu, caused by the H1N1A virus, in certain regions of the world, including parts of Asia. An outbreak of avian flu, SARS, swine flu, or other contagious disease or the measures taken by the governments of affected countries against such potential outbreaks, may seriously interrupt our production operations or those of our suppliers and customers, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The perception that an outbreak of avian flu, SARS, swine flu, or other contagious disease may occur again may also have an adverse effect on the economic conditions of countries in Asia.


    43


    Our production facilities are subject to risks of power shortages.


    Many cities and provinces in the PRC have suffered serious power shortages since the second quarter of 2004. Many of the regional grids do not have sufficient power generating capacity to fully satisfy the increased demand for electricity driven by continual economic growth and persistent hot weather. Local governments have recently required local factories to temporarily shut down their operations or reduce their daily operational hours in order to reduce local power consumption levels. To date, our operations have not been affected by those administrative measures. However, there is a risk that our operations may be affected by those administrative measures in the future, thereby causing material production disruption and delay in delivery schedule. In such event, our business, results of operation and financial conditions could be materially adversely affected. We do not have any back-up power generation system. Although we have not experienced any power outages in the past, we may be adversely affected by any power outages in the future.


    Implementation

    Under the New Enterprise Income Tax Law, or the New CIT Law, we may be classified as a “resident enterprise” of China. Such classification will likely result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC stockholders.

    China passed the PRC’s new corporate income tax law may adversely affect us.


    On March 16, 2007, the National People’s CongressNew CIT Law and its implementing rules, both of the PRC determined to adopt a new corporate income tax law in its fifth plenary session. The new corporate income tax law unifies the application scope, tax rate, tax deduction and preferential policy for both domestic and foreign-invested enterprises. The new corporate income tax law will bewhich became effective on January 1, 2008. AccordingUnder the New CIT Law, an enterprise established outside of China with “de facto management bodies” within China is considered a “resident enterprise,” meaning that it can be treated in a manner similar to a Chinese enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The implementing rules of the New CIT Law define de facto management as “substantial and overall management and control over the production and operations, personnel, accounting, and properties” of the enterprise. Because the New CIT Law and its implementing rules are new, no official interpretation or application of this new “resident enterprise” classification is available. Therefore, it is unclear how tax authorities will determine tax residency based on the facts of each case.

    If the PRC tax authorities determine that China BAK Battery, Inc. is a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, a number of unfavorable PRC tax consequences could follow. First, we may be subject to the enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide taxable income as well as PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations. In our case, this would mean that income such as interest on offering proceeds and non-China source income would be subject to PRC enterprise income tax at a rate of 25%. Second, although under the New CIT Law and its implementing rules dividends paid to us from our PRC subsidiaries would qualify as “tax-exempt income,” we cannot guarantee that such dividends will not be subject to a 10% withholding tax, as the PRC foreign exchange control authorities, which enforce the withholding tax, have not yet issued guidance with respect to the processing of outbound remittances to entities that are treated as resident enterprises for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. Finally, it is possible that future guidance issued with respect to the new corporate income“resident enterprise” classification could result in a situation in which a 10% withholding tax law,is imposed on dividends we pay to our non-PRC stockholders and with respect to gains derived by our non-PRC stockholders from transferring our shares. We are actively monitoring the applicable incomepossibility of “resident enterprise” treatment for the 2009 tax rate for our operating subsidiaries isyear and are evaluating appropriate organizational changes to avoid this treatment, to the extent possible.

    In addition, under the New CIT Law, dividends payable by a FIE to any of its foreign non-resident enterprise investors shall be subject to change. As implementation detailsa 10% withholding tax, unless such foreign non-resident enterprise investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has signed a tax treaty or arrangement for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income with China that provides for a reduced rate of withholding tax on dividends. Since the PRC and Hong Kong have signed the above-mentioned tax arrangement for the avoidance of double taxation, and Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin are wholly owned by BAK International, the dividends payable by each of Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin to its foreign non-resident enterprise investors are expected to be subject to a 5% withholding tax pursuant to the China-Hong Kong double tax arrangement. However, dividends declared and paid from pre-January 1, 2008 distributable profits are grandfathered under the New CIT Law and are not yet been announced, we cannot be sure of the potential impact of this new corporate income tax law on our financial position and operating results.


    Changes in PRC property rights law may affect our interests in our properties.

    The new PRC Law on Property Rights was approved by the Fifth Session of the Tenth National People's Congress on March 16, 2007, and went into effect on October 1, 2007. The Property Rights Law is the first piece of Mainland PRC legislation that comprehensively regulates the different types of rights which can be created or acquired over tangible property. We are currently evaluating the impact of the Property Rights Law.

    subject to withholding tax.

    44


    The Chinese government exerts substantial influence over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities.

    Only recently has China permitted provincial and local economic autonomy and private economic activities.

    The ChinesePRC government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every sector of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. Our ability to operate in China may be harmed by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and export tariffs, environmental regulations, land use and property ownership rights, property and other matters. We believe that our operations in China are in material compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, the central or local governments of the jurisdictions in which we operate may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with such regulations or interpretations.

    41


    Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision not to continue to support recent economic reforms and to return to a more centrally planned economy or regional or local variations in the implementation of economic policies, could have a significant effect on economic conditions in China or particular regions thereof, and could require us to divest ourselves of any interest we then hold in Chinese properties or joint ventures.


    Future inflation in China may inhibit our ability to conduct business profitably in China.

    In recent years, the Chinese economy has experienced periods of rapid expansion and highly fluctuating rates of inflation. During the past ten years, the rate of inflation in China has been as high as 20.7%5.9% and as low as -2.2%-1.4% . These factors have led to the adoption by the Chinese government, from time to time, of various corrective measures designed to restrict the availability of credit or regulate growth and contain inflation. High inflation may in the future cause the Chinese government to impose controls on credit and/or prices, or to take other action, which could inhibit economic activity in China, and thereby harm the market for our products.


    We may be unable to complete a business combination transaction efficiently or on favorable terms due to complicated merger and acquisition regulations implemented on September 8, 2006.
    On September 8, 2006, the PRC Ministry of Commerce, or “MOFCOM,” together with several other government agencies, promulgated a comprehensive set of regulations governing the approval process by which a Chinese company may participate in an acquisition of its assets or its equity interests and by which a Chinese company may obtain public trading of its securities on a securities exchange outside of the PRC. Depending on the structure of the transaction, these regulations will require the Chinese parties to make a series of applications and supplemental applications to the governmental agencies. In some instances, the application process may require the presentation of economic data concerning a transaction, including appraisals of the target business and evaluations of the acquirer, which are designed to allow the government to assess the transaction. Governmental approvals will have expiration dates by which a transaction must be completed and reported to the governmental agencies. Compliance with the new regulations is likely to be more time-consuming and expensive than in the past and the government now can exert more control over the combination of two businesses. Accordingly, due to these new regulations, our ability to engage in business combination transactions has become significantly more complicated, time-consuming and expensive and we may not be able to negotiate a transaction that is acceptable to our stockholders or sufficiently protect their interests in a transaction.
    The new regulations allow PRC government agencies to assess the economic terms of a business combination transaction. Parties to a business combination transaction may have to submit to MOFCOM and the other government agencies an appraisal report, an evaluation report and the acquisition agreement, all of which form part of the application for approval, depending on the structure of the transaction. The regulations also prohibit a transaction at an acquisition price obviously lower than the appraised value of the Chinese business or assets and in certain transaction structures, require that consideration must be paid within defined periods, generally not in excess of a year. The regulations also limit our ability to negotiate various terms of the acquisition, including aspects of the initial consideration, contingent consideration, holdback provisions, indemnification provisions and provisions relating to the assumption and allocation of assets and liabilities. Transaction structures involving trusts, nominees and similar entities are prohibited. Therefore, such regulations may impede our ability to negotiate and complete a business combination transaction on financial terms, which satisfy our investors and protect our stockholders’ economic interests and we may not be able to negotiate a business combination transaction on terms favorable to our stockholders.

    Risks Related to Our Common Stock


    The market price for our common stock may be volatile.


    The market price for our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, some of which may be beyond our control. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock include:


    the lack of depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;
    42

    • the lack of depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;

    • actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;

    • announcements of new products or services by us or our competitors;

    • changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;

    • market conditions in our industry;

    • changes in operations or market valuations of other companies in our industry;

    • our sales of common stock;

    • investor perceptions of us and our business;

    • changes in the estimates of the future size and growth rate of our markets;

    • market conditions in industries of our customers;

    • announcements by our competitors of significant acquisitions;

    • strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

    45


    actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
    announcements of new products or services by us or our competitors;
    changes in financial estimates by securities analysts;
    market conditions in our industry;
    changes in operations or market valuations of other companies in our industry;
    our sales of common stock;
    investor perceptions of us and our business;
    changes in the estimates of the future size and growth rate of our markets;
    market conditions in industries of our customers;
    announcements by our competitors of significant acquisitions;
    strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
    recruitment or departures of key personnel;
    potential litigation;
    any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting; and
    the overall economy, geopolitical events, terrorist activities, or threats of terrorism.

    • recruitment or departures of key personnel;

    • potential litigation;

    • any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting; and

    • the overall economy, geopolitical events, terrorist activities, or threats of terrorism.

    In addition, the stock market in general has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the performance of listed companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. For example, the trading price of our common stock could decline in reaction to events that negatively affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us at all.


    In the past, many companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be a target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.


    Our directors and executive officers, collectively, own approximately 39.7%34.4% of our outstanding common stock and may be able to control our management and affairs.


    As of September 30, 2007,2009, Mr. Xiangqian Li, our president and chief executive officer and chairman of our board, and our other executive officers and directors beneficially owned an aggregate of 39.7%34.4% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, our directors and executive officers, acting together, may be able to control our management and affairs, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as mergers, consolidation, and sale of all or substantially all of our assets. Consequently, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control, including a merger, consolidation or other business combination involving us, even if such a change of control would benefit our stockholders.


    Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws could entrench our board of directors and prevent a change in control.


    Our articles of incorporation provide that atspecial meetings of the requeststockholders can only be called by our president or any other executive officer, or the board of directors, or any member thereof, the record holder or holders of at least 10% of ourall shares entitled to vote we needat the meeting, or the president or secretary at the written request of our stockholders holding not less than 30% of all shares issued, outstanding and entitled to call a special meeting of stockholders.vote. In addition, our bylaws and/or our articles of incorporation (i) allow vacancies in the board of directors to be filled by a majority of the remaining directors, though less than a quorum, (ii) provide that no contract or transaction between us and one or more of our directors or officers is void if certain criteria are met, and (iii) provide that our bylaws may be amended or appealed at any meeting of the board of directors at which a quorum is present, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present at such meeting. meeting, and (iv) provide that at an annual meeting, our stockholders elect a board of directors and transact such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting; by contrast, at a special meeting, our stockholders may transact only the business for the purposes specified in the notice of the meeting unless all of our stockholders entitled to vote are present at the special meeting and consent.

    In addition, our board of directors may cause us to issue our authorized but unissued shares of common stock in the future without stockholders’ approval. These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of a majority of our common stock by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.

    Collectively, these provisions may have the effect of entrenching our existing board members, discouraging or preventing a transaction including a change in control transaction where such transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders.

    43

    46



    We are obligated to indemnify our officers and directors for certain losses they suffer.


    To the fullest extent permitted by Chapter 78 of the Nevada Revised Statues, we may, if and to the extent authorized by our board of directors, indemnify our officers and any other persons who we have power to indemnify against liability, reasonable expense or other matter whatsoever. If we are required to indemnify any persons under this policy, we may have to pay indemnity in a substantial amount which we may be unable to recover at all.

    Item

    ITEM 1B.         Unresolved Staff Comments.


    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

    None.

    Item

    ITEM 2.             Properties


    PROPERTIES.

    We have completed the construction of 188,918and put into use facilities measuring 218,178 square meters of new facilities comprised of manufacturing facilities, warehousing and packaging facilities, dormitory space, dining halls and administrative offices at the BAK Industrial Park.Park in Shenzhen. Of that space, approximately 111,00081,411 square meters are new manufacturing facilities. We have completed the construction and put into use an additional administrative area, production facility, fourfacilities measuring 65,127 square meters comprised of manufacturing facilities, a warehousedormitory space, dining halls and packagingother facilities in Tianjin. Of that space, approximately 44,129 square meters are manufacturing facilities. The primary reasons for our continuing investments in the facilities in Tianjin are to realize the benefits of our prior investment in these facilities, to position the Company to capitalize on our knowledge of and experience with established markets for lithium-phosphate technology, such as electric bicycles, cordless power tools, and mining lamps, and to penetrate emerging consuming markets for this technology, such as light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. The first trial shipment of its lithium-phosphate cells was used in electric bicycles, cordless power tools, uninterruptible power supplies and mining lamps. We have received positive market feedback to these samples. We expect interest in light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles to increase demand for our rechargeable lithium-based batteries substantially. We have been engaged in the research and development of lithium-phosphate cells specifically for use in light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. As indicated above, our Tianjin facility three dormitoriesis the nexus for all such research and two dining halls. development.

    At present, we have no significant payment obligations related to these facilities.


    We believe that our existing facilities have met our current business needs and will meet the needs of our expanded operations.


    The following table sets forth the breakdown of our facilities as of September 30, 20072009 based on use and product type:


    Shenzhen BAK Industrial Park
    facilities
     
    Usage
     
    Area (m2)2))
    Completed facilities
     Manufacturing  
      

    Prismatic (steel-case)

     27,776- 0 -
      

    Prismatic (aluminum-case)

     15,91945,179
      

    Cylindrical

     15,40022,344
      

    Lithium polymer

    6,944
      High-power lithium-phosphate13,888 6,944
      R&D and Administrativeadministrative 18,59339,425
      Warehousing 19,087
      Workers DormitoryWorkers’ dormitory 46,124
      Other facilities 32,131
      
    Sub-total
     188,918218,178
         
    Facilities under construction
    BAK Tianjin facilities

    Completed facilities

     Manufacturing  
      Prismatic (aluminum-case)

    High-power lithium-phosphate

     29,26044,129
    Workers’ dormitory13,481
    Dinning hall7,407
    Other facilities110
    Sub-total65,127
         
      
    Sub-total
    Total
     29,260
    283,305 
    Total
    218,178
    We currently do not hold the land use right to the tract of property on which we have constructed our manufacturing facilities and other related facilities.

    47



    According to the relevant PRC laws and regulations, a land use right certificate, along with government approvals for land planning, project planning, and construction must be obtained before the construction of any building is commenced. An ownership certificate will be granted by the government upon application under the condition that the aforementioned certificate and government approvals are obtained. On June 20, 2007, weWe recently obtained the approvals for project planningland use right to the tract of property on which we have constructed and on which we plan further construction from the government of our manufacturing facilities and other related facilities in Shenzhen.

    44


    We are While we have been constructing and have completed a substantial part of the construction of our facilities with the approval of the local government of Kuichong Township of Longgang District of Shenzhen, which we understand doesit did not have the authority to grant us the land use rights certificate. However, the Company obtained approval for project planning and construction from the government of Shenzhen on June 20, 2007. Under ouran agreement with the Kuichong Township government we haveof Shenzhen for the acquisition of the land use rights to pay for a 50-yearBAK Industrial Park dated June 29, 2007, effective June 2008, the government agreed to provide us with the land use rights certificate atrelating to BAK Industrial Park on the condition that the Company would pay it an agreed unit price, which inadditional $11,819,841. According to a notice received from the aggregate amountedgovernment of Shenzhen on June 6, 2008, the Company obtained government grants of $7,889,991 to $4.0 million assubsidize this additional payment. As of September 30, 20042008, the Company had fully paid the remaining cost of $3,929,850 and $3.5 million as of September 30, 2007, following an adjustment ofhad obtained the site area after a land survey and foreign exchange adjustments. Out of the $3.5 million, $3.0 million has been paid to the Kuichong Township government. The Shenzhen municipal government has approved the grant of a land use rights certificate whichfor BAK Industrial Park.

    We have insurance for our manufacturing facilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd located in BAK Industrial Park and our manufacturing facilities at our Tianjin facility. However, we are currentlynot able to insure our new Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, China, until we receive the required certificate of property ownership. Upon receipt of the certificate of property ownership, we intend to procure such insurance. The applications for the related certificates of property ownership rights are in process with respect to our facilities at BAK Industrial Park and Tianjin (see discussion of obtaining. In the meantime,our Research and Development Test Centre below). As we have recognized a net payable purchase price of $529,000 forbeen granted the land use rights oncertificate to the assumption that it will be onpremises presently occupied by the same terms as those agreed with the Kuichong Township government.


    We believe that once we are granted the land use right certificate and related approvals are obtained,Company in BAK Industrial Park, there should be no legal barriers for us to obtain ana property ownership certificate for our premises atthis property. However, it is possible that the BAK Industrial Park. However, if we fail to obtain theShenzhen government may determine that even with our land use rightrights certificate, relating tothe buildings constructed at BAK Industrial Park and/orwere still constructed without the government approvals required for the construction of BAK Industrial Park, there is the risk that the buildings constructed need toproper authority and must be vacated as illegitimate constructions.constructions, and we might be subject to penalties and fines. However, we believe that itthis possibility, while present, is unlikely this risk will materialize.

    As of September 30, 2007, we had paid the lease prepayment amount of $717,000 for acquisition of land use rights in Shenzhen for a new Research and Development Test Centre and have obtained the land use rights certificate.

    remote.

    As of September 30, 2007, we had fully paid the lease prepayment amount of $14.1 million for the acquisition of land use rights inregarding our Tianjin andfacility. As of September 30, 2008, we had obtained the application for therelevant land use rights certificate wasto this facility. As of September 30, 2009, we were in process.


    We do not currently insure our manufacturing facilities since we have not yet receivedthe process of obtaining the relevant property ownership rights certificate to this facility. Pursuant to our land use right certificate. We intendrights certificate relating to procure such insurance onceour Tianjin facility, the Tianjin government had originally requested that we complete construction of the Tianjin facility before September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, we have receivedobtained an extension from the Business Administration Bureau of Beichen District, Tianjin, to make the remaining contribution of the registered capital by December 11, 2009, which we have interpreted as an extension of the completion date of construction to this date.

    As of September 30, 2007, we had paid the lease prepayment amount of $717,000 for the acquisition of land use rights for a new Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, China. As of September 30, 2008, we had obtained the relevant property ownership and land use rights certificate.

    ItemPursuant to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, we are required to complete at least 25% of the construction of the new Research and Development Test Centre facility by September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, the Shenzhen government has agreed to increase the dimensions of the Research and Development Test Centre and signed two supplemental agreements with us. According to the supplemental agreements, we are required to complete the construction by May 6, 2011. In addition, according to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, such land may not be pledged without the approval of the relevant government office. We are required to pledge our property ownership and land use rights certificate in relation to the new Research and Development Test Centre to China Development Bank pursuant to the loan agreement entered into with it. As of September 30, 2009 we were in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the requisite approval. In addition, the so-named “property ownership and land use rights certificate” relating to this facility that we were issued lacks certain terms relating to property ownership rights, which appears to indicate that the granting government has so far only granted us the relevant land use rights. As a result, this certificate may not be adequate evidence of our property ownership rights to this property. We anticipate that the government will re-grant this certificate with adequate property ownership indicia after we have satisfied the above construction requirement and followed certain procedures.

    48


    ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings.


    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

    Except as described below, we are not a party to any legal proceedings, nor are we aware of any threatened or contemplated proceedings which are expected to result in a material adverse effect on our financial position, or results of operation.

    Patent Litigation. On September 12, 2006, Hydro-Quebec, a Canadian company, and the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System brought a federal patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against us. We had an agreement with A123Systems, which, as amended on August 18, 2005, terminated in accordance with its terms on August 30, 2007, under which we had agreed to manufacture products for A123Systems according to the specifications furnished by, and using the finished electrodes and other materials consigned by, A123Systems to us. The plaintiffs alleged that, by manufacturing rechargeable lithium cells for A123Systems for use in DeWalt 36-volt cordless power tools manufactured by Black & Decker Corporation, we had infringed two U.S. patents owned by and exclusively licensed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and damages in an unspecified amount. A123Systems, Black & Decker Corporation and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. have also been named as co-defendants in this lawsuit. The court has not ruled on this lawsuit. The Company understands that this lawsuit is a countersuit against A123Systems, which filed a claim against Hydro-Quebec in the United States District Court of Massachusetts in April 2006. In that suit, A123Systems sought declaratory relief that the two said U.S. patents are invalid and that A123Systems is not infringing either of these two patents.

    Following the filing of the lawsuit, the United States Patent and Trademark Office reexamined the patents. The patents were re-issued with substantial modification of the patent claims. The plaintiffs have advised that, in their view, the lawsuit continues to be viable against the defendants, including China BAK. The plaintiffs' position has not been tested. Currently pending is the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint to take the USPTO action into account.

    If the court issueswere to issue an adverse decision, we may be required to pay the plaintiffsCompany could face a substantial monetary damages and we may be prohibitedaward. While such an adverse decision could also prohibit the Company from future production of rechargeable lithium cells manufactured for A123Systems or be requiredmay require the Company to pay royalties to engage in any such production.production, the Company has no plans to pursue production of batteries for A123. The court has not yet issued any substantive decisions in the litigation and there has been no substantive pretrial discovery. As a decision onresult, at this matter and we aretime, the Company is unable to quantifyexpress a view on the extent of any possible award of damages that might become payable by us.


    be rendered in the litigation.

    Liquidated Damages Pursuant to September 2005 Registration Rights Agreement. We are liable for liquidated damages to certain shareholders whose shares were included in a resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that we filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we entered into with such shareholders in September 2005. Under the registration rights agreement, among other things, (a) if a registration statement filed pursuant thereto ceases to be effective after its effective date to cover the resale of the shares for more than 30 trading days or (b) if for any reason we are required to file an additional registration statement covering such shares, and we do not file such additional registration statement within 45 days after the time we first know, or reasonably should have known, that such registration statement would be required to be filed, then, while the relevant shares could not be put back to us, we would be liable to pay partial liquidated damages to those selling shareholders equal to 1.0% of the aggregate investment amount paid by those selling shareholders for the shares, and on each monthly anniversary thereafter, unless the event is cured by such date, an additional 1.5% on (except with respect to the first such event) a daily pro-rata basis.

    45


    On August 15, 2006, the SEC declared effective a post-effective amendment we filed on August 4, 2006 to terminate the effectiveness of the resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that included the resale of the shares held by those selling shareholders. Accordingly, as we were no longer eligible to file on Form SB-2, we were required to file an additional registration statement within 45 days after the termination of the effectiveness of the Form SB-2. On October 11, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 that covers resale of the shares held by those shareholders, which was declared to be effective on October 19, 2006. Following the termination of the Form SB-2, our failure to file an additional registration statement within the period provided under the registration rights agreement triggered, for the first time, an obligation to pay liquidated damages to the selling shareholders of 1% of the aggregate investment amount paid by them for the shares, or $241,232, based on the formula specified in the registration rights agreement. Because the Form S-1 was filed by the one-month anniversary of the applicable filing date, the event was cured and no additional liquidated damages were incurred. We previously reported in our Annual Report on2006 Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “12/31/06 Form 10-Q”), that liquidated damages totaling $487,946 were due from us in respect of such event based on an incorrect interpretation of the liquidated damages due under the registration rights agreement. Among other things, the amount was calculated on a pro rata daily basis although the event, the first under the registration rights agreement, was cured by its one-month anniversary date.

    49


    In addition, on December 8, 2006, we filed our 2006 Form 10-K. After the filing of the 2006 Form 10-K, our previously filed registration statement on Form S-1 was no longer available for resale by the selling shareholders whose shares were included in such Form S-1. A post-effective amendment to the Form S-1 covering resale by the selling shareholders was declared effective by the SEC on March 23, 2007. Our failure to have the post-effective amendment declared effective within the 30-trading-day time period provided under the registration rights agreement (i.e., by January 25, 2007), triggered, for the second time, an obligation to pay liquidated damages to the selling shareholders. We estimate that we are liable to those selling shareholders for liquidated damages related to this second event in the amount of approximately $810,000, such that the total current estimated liquidated damages relating to both events amounts to approximately $1 million.


    As reported in our 2006 Form 10-K and our 12/31/06 Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we previously recorded charges in our statement of income and comprehensive income of $290,575 for the year ended September 30, 2006, and $197,371 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, based on the original incorrect interpretation of the calculation of liquidated damages. Accordingly, the amounts recorded in excess of $241,232 (i.e., $246,714) have been applied to offset the charge related to the liquidated damages incurred related to the second event in the second fiscal quarter of 2007, and we have recorded an additional charge in the second fiscal quarter of 2007 relating to the additional liquidated damages incurred of $563,000. We have assessed the impact of the foregoing on the financial statements included in our 2006 Form 10-K and our 12/31/06 Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, and have determined that the impact is not material. Accordingly, we do not intend to restate the financial information included in the 2006 Form 10-K or the 12/31/06 Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006;10-Q; however, future filings will reflect the foregoing information. No liquidated damages have been paid pursuant to the registration rights agreement that we entered into in September 2005 as of the filing date of this Report.

    Item 4. Submission of Matters

    Liquidated Damages Pursuant to a Vote of Security Holders.


    On September 21,November 2007 our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders was held. Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Act of 1933. At the meeting, the matters brought for stockholder vote were: (1) To elect five persons to the Board of Directors of the Company, each to serve until a successor is elected and qualified by the shareholders of the Company or until such person shall resign, be removed or otherwise leave office and (2) To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of PKF as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm forRegistration Rights Agreement. During the fiscal year endingended September 30, 2009, we were initially liable for liquidated damages to a shareholder whose shares were required to be included in a resale registration statement on Form S-3 that we filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we entered into with this shareholder and certain other investors in November 2007. NoUnder the registration rights agreement, among other businessthings, if a registration statement filed pursuant thereto has not been declared effective by the SEC by the 100th calendar day after the closing of our private placement on November 9, 2007, or the Effectiveness Deadline, then we would be liable to pay partial liquidated damages to each investor of (a) 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such investor for the shares it purchased in our November 2007 private placement on the one-month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline; (b) an additional 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such investor every thirtieth day thereafter (prorated for periods totaling less than thirty days) until the earliest of the effectiveness of the registration statement, the ten-month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline, and the time that we are no longer required to keep such resale registration statement effective because either the investors have sold all of their shares or the investors may sell their shares pursuant to Rule 144 without volume limitations; and (c) 0.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by each investor for the shares it purchased in our November 2007 private placement on the ten-month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline and every thirtieth day thereafter (pro-rated for periods totaling less than thirty days), until the earlier of the effectiveness of the registration statement and the time that we are no longer required to keep such resale registration statement effective because either the investors have sold all of their shares or the investors may sell their shares pursuant to Rule 144 without volume limitations. Such liquidated damages would bear interest at the rate of 1% per month (prorated for partial months) until paid in full.

    50


    On December 21, 2007, pursuant to the registration rights agreement, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3, which was brought beforedeclared effective by the meeting. Stockholder votesSEC on May 7, 2008. The lateness of this filing triggered liquidated damages consistent with the formula described above. On August 26, 2008, we conducted a registered direct offering of 4,102,564 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $3.90 per share, in which the investors also received warrants to purchase up to 4,102,564 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.90 per share. With one exception, all of the investors that participated in our November 2007 private placement, or affiliates of them, participated in our August 2008 registered direct offering. We reduced each of these investors’ (or each such investor’s participating affiliate’s) purchase price by an amount that was at least equal to the amount that we determined that we were castliable for against or withheld,as liquidated damages to such investor (or its participating affiliate). As of June 30, 2009, the remaining investor had waived any and all rights relating to liquidated damages pursuant to the November 2007 registration rights agreement. As of September 30, 2009, approximately $159,000 of liquidated damages remained outstanding for accounting purposes.  Pursuant to the settlements described above, however, we do not believe that we are actually liable for this amount.

    Make-Good Settlements. Beginning on March 13, 2008, we have entered into settlement agreements with certain investors in the January 20, 2005, private placement completed by the Company. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, we and such investors have agreed, without any admission of liability, to a settlement and mutual releases from all claims relating to the January 20, 2005 private placement, including all claims relating to 1,089,775 “make good shares” of our common stock that had been placed into escrow by Xiangqian Li, our chairman and chief executive officer, in connection with the January 20, 2005, private placement, as well as all claims, including claims for liquidated damages, relating to registration rights granted in connection with the January 20, 2005, private placement. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, we have made settlement payments to each of the settling investors of a number of shares of common stock equal to 50% of the number of abstentions and broker non-votes“make good shares” such investor had claimed. Aggregate settlement payments amounted to 368,745 shares as to each director nomineeof June 30, 2009, all of which were as follows:


    Name of Director
     
    For
     
    Against
     
    Withheld
     
    Abstention
     
    Broker Non-Votes
    Xiangqian Li 27,607,811 6,229 - 1,017,563 -
    Huanyu Mao 26,011,573 1,602,467 - 1,017,563 -
    Richard B. Goodner 26,017,962 1,596,078 - 1,017,563 -
    Charlene Spoede Budd 27,610,830 3,210 - 1,017,563 -
    Chunzhi Zhang 27,611,330 2,710 - 1,017,563 -

    28,212,799 votes for, 133,039 votes against, and 285,765 abstained were cast to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of PKF as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm forissued in the fiscal year endingended September 30, 2007.

    46


    2008. Share payments to date have been made in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and/or other applicable provisions of the Securities Act. In accordance with the settlement agreements, we filed a registration statement covering the resale of such shares, which was declared effective by the SEC on June 26, 2008.

    In accordance with the Delivery of Make Good Shares, Settlement and Release Agreement entered into with Mr. Li on October 22, 2007 (the “Li Settlement Agreement”), we may continue to negotiate with the investors who participated in the January 20, 2005, private placement in order to achieve a complete settlement of our obligations under the applicable agreements with such investors.

    ITEM 4.         SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

    None.

    PART II


    Item

    ITEM 5.         Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.


    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

    Market Price Information for Our Common Stock


    Since May 31, 2006, our common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “CBAK.” Prior to that date, our common stock had been quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “CBBT.” On December 10, 2007,11, 2009, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market was $4.49$2.48 per share.


    The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the range of closing high and low bid prices of our common stock as reported by the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board and the Nasdaq Global Market, as adjusted for all previously effected stock splits. These prices do not include retail markup, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

    51



    In reviewing the foregoing table, it should be noted that the exchange of stock by which we acquired our current operations occurred on January 20, 2005.
      
    Common Stock
     
    Quarter Ended
     
    High
     
    Low
     
    Fiscal 2006
         
    December 31, 2005 $11.10 $5.60 
    March 31, 2006 $12.50 $7.80 
    June 30, 2006 $10.75 $8.18 
    September 30, 2006 $8.80 $4.24 
    Fiscal 2007
     $8.8 $4.24 
    December 31, 2006 $7.99 $5.81 
    March 31, 2007 $6.49 $3.25 
    June 30, 2007 $4.42 $3.05 
    September 30, 2007 $8.82 $3.36 

      

    Common Stock

     
           
      High  Low 
    Year Ended September 30, 2009      
    First Quarter$3.70 $1.21 
    Second Quarter$1.82 $0.89 
    Third Quarter$3.64 $1.60 
    Fourth Quarter$4.95 $2.54 
           
    Year Ended September 30, 2008      
    First Quarter$8.58 $3.58 
    Second Quarter$5.88 $3.16 
    Third Quarter$5.25 $3.60 
    Fourth Quarter$5.10 $3.50 

    Holders of Our Common Stock


    As of December 10, 2007,11, 2009, there were 52,954,603 63,601,276shares of our common stock outstanding. As of December 10, 2007,11, 2009, we had approximately 120 55record holders of our capitalcommon stock.


    This number excludes the shares of our common stock owned by stockholders holding stock under nominee security position listings.

    Dividend Policy


    We have never declared or paid any dividends, nor do we have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.

    47


    As we are a holding company, we rely on dividends paid to us by our subsidiaries in the PRC through our Hong Kong subsidiary, BAK International. In accordance with its articles of association, each of our subsidiaries in the PRC is required to allocate to its enterprise development reserve at least 10% of its respective after-tax profits determined in accordance with the PRC accounting standards and regulations. Each of our subsidiaries in the PRC may stop allocations to its general reserve if such reserve has reached 50% of its registered capital. Allocations to the reserve can only be used for making up losses and other specified purposes and may not be paid to us in forms of loans, advances, or cash dividends. Dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to BAK International, our Hong Kong subsidiary, will not be subject to Hong Kong capital gains or other income tax under current Hong Kong laws and regulations because they will not be deemed to be assessable income derived from or arising in Hong Kong.


    Our board of directors has discretion on whether to pay dividends unless the distribution would render us unable to repay our debts as they become due, as provided in Chapter 78.288 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.


    Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans


    See Item 12. “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters — Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.”


    Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


    No securities were sold by the registrant during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20072009 that were not registered under the Securities Act.


    On November 9, 2007, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement dated November 6, 2007, we sold to certain accredited investors 3,500,000 shares of our common stock at $3.90 per share, which collectively represented approximately 6.6% of our issued and outstanding capital stock as of and immediately after consummation of the sale, for an aggregate purchase price of $13.65 million.

    The foregoing shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The investors who received the shares agreed that (a) they had access to all of the Company’s information pertaining to the investment and were provided with the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers regarding the offering, (b) they were acquiring the shares for their own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act and (c) they would not sell or otherwise transfer the purchased shares unless in compliance with state and federal securities laws. Each of the investors represented that they are accredited investors as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act and that there was no general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offer and sale of the securities.

    Purchases of Our Equity Securities


    No repurchases of our common stock were made during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

    48
    2009.

    52


    Item

    ITEM 6.         Selected Financial Data.


    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

    Selected Consolidated Financial Data


    The selected consolidated statement of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss) data for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.


    The selected consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2003, 20042005, 2006 and 2005,2007, and the selected consolidated financial data for the years ended September 30, 20032005 and 2004,2006, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Report.


    Through a share exchange on January 20, 2005, we acquired 100% of BAK International, which owns 100% of Shenzhen BAK. We accounted for this share exchange as a reverse acquisition and succeeded to and are considered to be a continuation of Shenzhen BAK’s operations for the purpose of our financial statement presentation.


    The following selected consolidated historical financial information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information contained in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

      As of September 30, 
      2009  2008  2007  2006(1)  2005 
      (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data) 
    Statement of Operations Data:               
    Net revenues$ 211,144 $ 245,348 $ 145,861 $ 143,829 $ 101,922 
    Cost of revenues$ 184,388 $ 214,442 $ 120,255 $ 104,196 $ 76,047 
    Gross profit$ 26,756 $ 30,906 $ 25,606 $ 39,633 $ 25,875 
    Operating expenses$ 33,809 $ 31,402 $ 21,025 $ 17,061 $ 10,391 
    Operating (loss) / income$ (7,053)$ (496)$ 4,581 $ 22,572 $ 15,484 
    Finance costs, net$ 9,356 $ 11,021 $ 5,225 $ 1,888 $ 845 
    Gain on trading securities$ - $ - $ - $ 279 $ - 
    Government grant income$ 636 $ 1,774 $ 1,035 $ - $ - 
    Other (income) / expenses$ (528)$ (757)$ 103 $ 205 $ 490 
    Income tax (benefit) / expense$ (1,253)$ (1,045)$ (195)$ 593 $ 652 
    Net (loss) / income$ (13,992)$ (7,941)$ 483 $ 20,165 $ 13,497 
    Other comprehensive income / (loss)               
    - Foreign currency translation adjustment$ (354)$ 15,261 $ 6,436 $ 2,443 $ 1,005 
    Comprehensive (loss) / income$ (14,346)$ 7,320 $ 6,919 $ 22,608 $ 14,502 
    Net (loss) / income per share data(2)               
    Basic and Diluted$ (0.25)$ (0.15)$ 0.01 $ 0.41 $ 0.35 
    Weighted average number of shares               
    Basic 56,964  52,314  48,979  48,880  38,289 
    Diluted 56,964  52,314  49,442  48,913  38,409 

    53



      
    As of September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006(1)
     
    2005
     
    2004
     
    2003
     
      
    (in thousands, except per share data)
     
    Statement of Operations Data:
               
                
    Net Revenues  145,861  143,829  101,922  63,746  20,045 
                     
    Cost of Revenues  120,255  104,196  76,047  50,294  14,534 
                     
    Gross profit  25,606  39,633  25,875  13,452�� 5,511 
                     
    Operating Expenses:  21,025  17,061  10,391  4,679  1,698 
                     
    Operating Income  4,581  22,572  15,484  8,773  3,813 
                     
    Finance costs, net  5,225  1,888  845  454  121 
                     
    Gain on trading securities  -  279  -  -  - 
                     
    Government grant income  1,035  -  -  -  - 
                     
    Other expenses  103  205  490  10  3 
                     
    Income Taxes / (benefits)  (195) 593  652  507  (15)
                     
    Net income  483  20,165  13,497  7,802  3,704 
                     
    Other comprehensive income-
    Foreign currency translation adjustment
      
    6,436
      
    2,443
      
    1,005
      
    -(3)
     
     
    -(3)
     
                     
    Comprehensive income  6,919  22,608  14,502  7,802  3,704 
                     
    Net Income per share data(2)
                    
    Basic and Diluted  0.01  0.41  0.35  0.25  0.12 
                     
    Weighted average number of shares                
    Basic  48,979  48,880  38,289  31,226  31,226 
    Diluted  49,442  48,913  38,409  31,226  31,226 

    (1) Prior to October 1, 2005, we applied the intrinsic-value method for stock-based award accounting, under which compensation expense is recorded only if on measurement day, which is generally the date of grant, the market price exceeded the exercise price. No stock-based compensation costs were recognized in fiscal year 2005. We adopted SFAS 123(R), now included in ASC Topic 718, commencing from October 1, 2005 using the modified prospective approval. Therefore, share-based compensation costs of $2.6 million, $3.8 million, and $3.7 million are recognized in fiscal years 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

    (2) Basic net (loss) / income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) / income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if currently outstanding securities or other contracts to issue shares were exercised or converted into shares.

    (3) Less than $1,000.

      As of September 30, 
      2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
      (in thousands of U.S. dollars) 
    Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:               
    Cash and cash equivalents$ 30,678 $ 35,707 $ 14,197 $ 21,100 $ 33,056 
    Pledged deposits$ 31,115 $ 4,449 $ 4,595 $ 12,972 $ 19,392 
    Trade accounts receivable, net$ 83,292 $ 82,740 $ 63,151 $ 64,332 $ 43,864 
    Inventories$ 65,535 $ 67,583 $ 59,827 $ 47,389 $ 21,696 
    Property, plant and equipment, net$ 219,685 $ 195,435 $ 145,123 $ 109,406 $ 65,751 
    Lease prepayments, net$ 32,166 $ 31,782 $ 17,884 $ 3,161 $ 3,155 
    Total assets$ 472,084 $ 424,047 $ 307,229 $ 259,655 $ 189,486 
                    
    Total current liabilities$ 266,270 $ 193,466 $ 150,926 $ 145,722 $ 98,944 
    Short-term bank loans$ 139,159 $ 105,598 $ 89,871 $ 67,900 $ 39,545 
    Long term liabilities$ 49,213 $ 63,509 $ 29,571 $ 305 $ 233 
    Total liabilities$ 315,483 $ 256,975 $ 180,497 $ 146,027 $ 99,177 
    Total shareholders’equity$ 156,601 $ 167,072 $ 126,732 $ 113,628 $ 90,309 
                    
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$ 472,084 $ 424,047 $ 307,229 $ 259,655 $ 189,486 

    (1)Prior to October 1, 2005, we applied the intrinsic-value method for stock-based award accounting, under which compensation expense is recorded only if on measurement day, which is generally the date of grant, the market price exceeded the exercise price. No stock-based compensation costs were recognized in fiscal year 2005. We adopted SFAS 123R commencing on October 1, 2005 using the modified prospective approval. Therefore, share-based compensation costs of $4.3 million and $2.6 million are recognized in fiscal year 2006 and 2007, respectively.
    (2)Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if currently outstanding securities or other contracts to issue shares were exercised or converted into shares.
    (3)Less than $1,000.
    49
      As of September 30, 
      2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 
      (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages) 
    Other Consolidated Financial Data:               
    Gross margin (1) 12.7%  12.6%  17.6%  27.6%  25.4% 
    Operating (loss) / margin (2) (3.3%) (0.2%) 3.1%  15.7%  15.2% 
    Net (loss) / margin (3) (6.6%) (3.2%) 0.3%  14.0%  13.2% 
    Capital expenditures$ 41,507 $ 51,228 $ 65,835 $ 41,382 $ 30,594 
    Depreciation and amortization$ 12,832 $ 13,249 $ 8,912 $ 5,816 $ 3,581 
    Net cash provided by / (used in)operating activities$38,391$2,704$2,986$(5,685)$8,014
    Net cash used in investing activities$ 41,638 $ 50,551 $ 65,895 $ 41,416 $ 30,596 
    Net cash (used in) / provided byfinancing activities$(1,623)$67,164$55,244$35,047$52,363

    (1) Gross margin represents gross profit divided by revenues.

    (2) Operating (loss) / margin represents operating (loss) / income divided by revenues.

    (3) Net (loss) / margin represents net (loss) / income divided by revenues.

    54



     
    As of September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
    2004
     
    2003
     
      
    (in thousands)
     
    Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
                    
    Cash and cash equivalents  14,197  21,100  33,056  3,212  671 
    Pledged deposits  4,595  12,972  19,392  7,120  821 
    Trade accounts receivable, net  63,151  64,332  43,864  21,018  6,758 
    Inventories  59,827  47,389  21,696  29,536  7,994 
    Property, plant and equipment, net  145,123  109,406  65,751  41,706  4,881 
    Lease prepayments, net  17,884  3,161  3,155  4,002  - 
    Total assets  307,229  259,655  189,486  109,155  22,807 
                     
    Total current liabilities  150,926  145,722  98,944  88,650  17,189 
    Short-term bank loans  89,871  67,900  39,545  29,116  3,479 
    Long term liabilities  29,571  305  233  75  - 
    Total liabilities  180,497  146,027  99,177  88,725  17,189 
    Total stockholders’ equity  126,732  113,628  90,309  20,430  5,618 
                     
    Total liabilities and owners’ equity  307,229  259,655  189,486  109,155  22,807 
     
    As of September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
    2004
     
    2003
     
      
    (in thousands, except percentages)
     
    Other Consolidated Financial Data:
       
    Gross margin (1)
      17.6% 27.6% 25.4% 21.1% 27.5%
    Operating margin (2)
      3.1% 15.7% 15.2% 13.8% 19.0%
    Net Margin (3)
      0.3% 14.0% 13.2% 12.2% 18.5%
    Capital expenditures  65,835  41,382  30,594  28,254  4,651 
    Depreciation and amortization  8,912  5,816  3,581  1,758  380 
    Net cash provided by / (used in) operating activities  
    2,986
      
    (5,685
    )
     
    8,014
      
    3,593
      
    2,950
     
    Net cash used in investing activities  65,895  41,416  30,596  28,300  4,669 
    Net cash provided by financing activities  55,244  35,047  52,363  27,249  2,296 

    (1)Gross margin represents gross profit divided by revenues.
    (2)Operating margin represents operating income divided by revenues.
    (3)Net margin represents net income divided by revenues.
    50

    Item

    ITEM 7.         Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.


    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

    The following management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking information. See “Forward Looking Statements” above for certain information concerning those forward looking statements. Our financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See “ —Exchange Rates” below for information concerning the exchange rates at which Renminbi were converted to U.S. dollars at various pertinent dates and for pertinent periods. References in this Report to a particular “fiscal” year are to our fiscal year ended on September 30.


    Overview


    Although the business climate in China is recovering, the global economic environment remains weak. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, we generated $211.1 million in net revenues, which is 13.9% lower than the $245.3 million in net revenues generated in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and 44.8% higher than our net revenues of $145.9 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. The substantial year-over-year decrease in net revenues during fiscal year 2009 as compared to the same period of fiscal years 2008 and 2007 was generally due to the global financial crisis and recession, which weakened demand for many of the products that our customers sell.

    In fiscal year 2009, we implemented our aggressive cost management program to reduce costs and expenses. We have adjusted our long-term and short-term bank loans structure, and as a result, finance costs decreased to their lowest annual levels since fiscal year 2007, $9.4million. We also have been focusing on developing new revenue sources in our domestic market and abroad.

    In the near-term, we anticipate operating challenges due to the difficult business environment. These challenges may impede the trend of increasing our revenues and gross margin. In response, we will continue to take cost-cutting actions such as maintaining the suspension of our steel-case cell production to reduce unneeded inventory and to lower our energy costs.

    We also are exploring and capitalizing on opportunities to generate additional sources of revenue. Our prismatic cell exports to India increased during fiscal year 2009, and we are still positively seeking to increase the market share of our prismatic cells for OEM cellular phones in China. Furthermore, we plan to focus more on our cylindrical cells and polymer cells, as the market demand for these products is increasing due to the gradual economic recovery. In addition, we are pursuing opportunities to raise our selling prices by penetrating high-end markets, and to further reduce the manufacturing costs and the purchase costs of raw materials.

    During fiscal year 2009, we initiated shipments of cylindrical cells to a battery pack manufacturer that services an international tier-one OEM notebook manufacturer after passing its product certification test in the March quarter of fiscal year 2009. Such shipments, while initially small, are expected to promote our penetration into the Notebook OEM market when North America begins its economic recovery.

    Also, our Tianjin facility received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells, used in electric bicycles, power tools, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production. We also sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in China’s State High-Tech Development Plan (also known as the National 863 program). We expect that these initiatives will set the stage for our future growth in the new energy industry. We believe that in the future this product will become a significant additional revenue source as the demand for it has been increasing.

    55


    To help us finance and expand our operations, we have access to $212.4 million in short-term credit facilities and $55.7 million in long-term credit facilities. As of September 30, 2009, the principal outstanding amounts included short-term bank loans of $131.9 million under credit facilities and $7.3 million separate from our credit facilities, long-term bank loans of $16.1 million maturing within one year and long-term bank loans of $39.6 million maturing in over one year, and bills payable of $30.9 million under credit facilities and $23.0 million separate from our credit facilities, leaving $49.6 million of short-term funds available under our credit facilities for additional cash needs. In addition, on July 10, 2008, our $60.0 million shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC, pursuant to which we raised $16.0 million in gross revenue from common stock purchases and issued common stock warrants exercisable for up to $16.0 million in additional gross proceeds. As none of the warrants were exercised before their expiration, as of September 30, 2009 we were in a position to raise up to an additional $44.0 million in gross proceeds from additional equity financings under this shelf registration statement.

    Our Business

    We are one of the largest manufacturers of lithium-ion battery cells in China and the world, as measured by production output. Our battery cells are the principal component of rechargeable lithium-based batteries used to power the following applications:


    cellular phones — customer segments include OEM and replacement battery manufacturers;
    notebook computers;
    portable consumer electronics, such as digital media devices, portable media players, and PDAs; and
    cordless power tools and other products using high-power lithium-phosphate batteries, such as miner’s lamps, electric bicycles, and hybrid electric vehicles.

    Our products are packed into batteries by third-party battery pack manufacturers in accordance with the specifications of manufacturers of portable electronic end applications. We conduct all of our operations in China, in close proximity to China’s electronics manufacturing base and its rapidly growing market.


    Historically, we have primarily manufactured prismatic lithium-ion cells for the cellular phone replacement battery market and OEM market. Our products are packed into batteries by third-party battery pack manufacturers in accordance with the specifications of manufacturers of portable electronic applications.


    At the request of our customers that order prismatic battery packs, we also engage battery pack battery manufacturers to assemble our prismatic cells into batteries for a fee and then sell battery packs to these customers both for the cellular phone battery replacement market and OEM markets.market. OEMs also purchase our battery cells from battery pack manufacturers. We expect that sales of prismatic battery packs in such a manner will represent a decreasing percentage of our revenues going forward.

    To meet the growing demand for our products and to capture new opportunities, we offer the following three product lines:

    56


    • High-power lithium-phosphate cellsfor use in cordless power tools, uninterruptible power supplies, mining lamps, electric bicycles, light electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and other applications. We began commercial production of lithium-phosphate cells at our Shenzhen facility for use in cordless power tools in October 2005, and for mining lamps in March 2007, at which point our lithium-phosphate cells passed certain related governmental safety tests. In December 2006, a new subsidiary, BAK Tianjin, was incorporated to focus on the R&D, manufacturing and distribution of lithium-phosphate cells. We have since shifted all lithium-phosphate cells manufacturing machinery, equipment and personnel from our Shenzhen facility to our Tianjin facility. In October 2008, our Tianjin facility completed construction of its first lithium-phosphate cells production line, and initiated trial production of lithium-phosphate cells. Our Tianjin facility is now capable of producing lithium-phosphate high-power cells for electric bicycles, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications in addition to those mentioned above. This facility has received positive market feedback to samples of its lithium-phosphate high-power cells. Moreover, this facility’s “Electric Vehicles Lithium-phosphate Power Battery Industrialization Project” was accepted into the PRC’s National High Technology Research and Development Program, or “National 863 Program”, by the PRC’s Ministry of Science and Technology. In that connection, we sent battery cell samples made at our Tianjin facility for light electric vehicles to customers and to manufacturing partners in the National 863 program. We received positive market feedback to these samples. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as we gradually increase our high-power cells production as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

    • Lithium polymer cells, historically for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, PDAs, Bluetooth headsets, digital media players, and digital audio players. We began commercial production of lithium polymer cells in September 2005. We have recently expanded the applications of our product offerings by adding three new product lines:


    Lithium polymer cells for use in ultra-portable electronic devices, such as high-end cellular phones, Bluetooth headsets, digital medial players and digital audio players. We began commercial production of lithium polymer cells in September 2005.
    Cylindrical lithium-ion cells for use in notebook computers. We began trial production of cylindrical cells in April 2006 and began commercial production in June 2006. In August 2007, we signed a non-binding letter of intent with HP, under which both parties have undertaken to work together in a set timeframe to reach a definitive agreement for us to supply cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells to HP or HP’s designated battery pack manufacturers for notebook computer batteries to be used in notebook computers manufactured by HP.
    High-power, lithium-phosphate cells for use in cordless power tools and other applications. Currently, we are actively seeking new applications for our lithium-phosphate cells, such as miner’s lamps, electric bicycles and hybrid electric vehicles.
    51

    lithium polymer cells to notebook computers. During fiscal year 2009, we received orders from notebook computer battery OEM manufacturer STL Technology Co., Ltd. We believe that we will generate additional revenue and increase market share as the demand for these cells has been increasing.

    Demand for Lithium-Based Batteries


    All of our products are lithium-based rechargeable battery cells. Rechargeable lithium-based battery cells, compared to other types of rechargeable battery cells based on nickel cadmium or nickel metal hydride chemistries, have a higher energy density, meaning a greater energy capacity relative to a given battery cell’s weight and size. As a result, use of lithium-based batteries has risen significantly in portable electronic products. As the cost/power ratio of lithium-based batteries continues to improve, it is expected that its usage will also extend into other applications. End-product applications that are driving the demand for rechargeable lithium-based batteries include cellular phones, notebook computers, cordless power tools and portable consumer electronics.


    Cellular Phones.  Phones. Demand for batteries for cellular phones is driven by two factors. The first is the sales of new cellular phones. An OEM of cellular phones includes a battery with a new cellular phone. There is also a replacement market for cellular phone batteries. Demand in the replacement market is in turn driven by a number of factors. Often a consumer will purchase a second battery to carry as a spare. In addition, lithium-ion batteries have a finite life, so over time consumers will need to purchase a battery to replace the failed battery in their phone. As the number of active cellular phone subscribers increases, the number of replacement batteries sold increases. A market characteristic unique to the Chinese cellular phone market is that cell phones are often sold and resold during their useful life. Over time these cell phones require a replacement battery. Our customers for cellular phone battery cells fall into two segments:

    OEM.  The OEMs manufacture mobile phone handsets. They purchase batteries to support their production of new cellular phones. They also purchase batteries to serve the replacement market which they sell under their own brand name.
    Independent Battery Manufacturers.    These third party manufacturers compete against the OEM for a share of the replacement market. They typically sell their products under their own brand name or a private label.

  • Independent Battery Manufacturers. These third party manufacturers compete against the OEM for a share of the replacement market. They typically sell their products under their own brand name or a private label.

  • 57


    Notebook Computers. Sales of notebook computers are driven by the increasing demand for mobile computing and the improved power and functionality of notebook computers. Lithium-based batteries have almost completely replaced nickel metal hydride batteries for notebook computers due to the increasing power of lithium-based batteries and demand for smaller lighter notebook computers.


    Power Tools and Other Applications for High-Power Lithium-Phosphate Batteries.Batteries. Power tools such as drills, saws and grinders are used for both commercial and personal use. Due to high power requirements, many power tools have historically used small combustion engines, used heavier nickel metal hydride batteries or relied on external power sources. However, since the beginning of 2005, most major tool manufacturers, including Milwaukee, DeWalt/Black & Decker, Metabo, Ridgid and Bosch, have begun to use lithium-based battery packs, in particular lithium-phosphate batteries, in their product lines. These manufacturers have taken advantage of both the increased power produced by lithium based batteries and the light weight of lithium based batteries by: (1) introducing more powerful products; (2) extending the life cycle of current products; or (3) decreasing the size of current products. The market for portable high-powered power tools and other applications for high-power lithium-phosphate batteries is rapidly growing and has prompted many users, both commercial and personal, to replace or upgrade their equipment.


    Moreover, due to such recent trends as renewed concerns relating to the availability and price of oil, increased legal fuel-efficiency requirements and incentives, and heightened interest in environmentally-friendly or “green” technologies, light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles are likely to continue to attract substantial interest from vehicle manufacturers and consumers. Light electric vehicles include bicycles, scooters, and motorcycles, with rechargeable electric motors. Due to their relatively small size and light design, approximately 24-150 lithium-phosphate cells can be used to power light electric vehicles. Hybrid electric vehicles include automobiles, trucks, buses, and other vehicles that combine a conventional propulsion system with a rechargeable energy storage system to achieve better fuel economy than conventional vehicles. As these vehicles tend to be large and heavy, their rechargeable energy storage system generally consists of a large quantity of rechargeable lithium-phosphate cells.

    Portable Consumer Electronics. This category includes digital audio players (such as MP3 players), digital still cameras, digital video cameras, portable DVD players, PDAs, BlackBerry devices, portable gaming systems and Bluetooth devices. There is a rapid trend to use lithium-based batteries in portable consumer electronics (both rechargeable and non-rechargeable) due to a desire for smaller, longer lasting devices.


    Pricing

    Pressure


    Portable electronic devices such from Increases in Costs of Raw Materials

    In the near-term, we anticipate that we will continue to experience pressure due to increased costs, including the costs of raw materials and overhead, as cellular phoneswell as the costs of additional anticipated capital improvements as we transition from primarily the replacement market industry to global first-tier OEM products. During the first fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2009, the price of lithium cobalt dioxide, the primary cost component of our battery products, remained at historically high levels. In response to this challenge, while we believe that we remain among the low-cost manufacturers in the industry, we are seeking to reduce the purchase costs of raw materials and notebook computers are subjectother unit costs of production while pursuing opportunities to declines in averageraise selling prices from time to time due to evolving technologies, industry standards and consumer preferences. As a result, manufacturers of these electronic devices expect us as suppliers to cutwhere it would benefit our costs and lower the prices of our products, particularly when they place substantial orders with us. We have reduced the prices of our products in the past in order to meet market demand and expect to continue to face market-driven downward pricing pressures in the future. Our ability to maintain our cost-effectiveness will be critical to our future success in an increasingly price-sensitive market.financial results. We seek to achieve this by ramping upincreasing our production capacity to give us greater economies of scale through a higher bargaining power to secure a supply of materials and equipment at a lower cost, and a larger base for spreading out our fixed costs. We believe this will provide incremental long-term growth opportunities, butIn addition, we are seeking to identify alternative raw materials suppliers to the extent there are viable alternatives and to expand our use of alternative raw materials. Among other things, we have successfully developed the technology to use substitute materials to reduce the amount of lithium cobalt dioxide used in the short-term,manufacture of lithium-based cells. We have also will require usrestructured our operations in an effort to incur substantial capital expenditures.

    52

    streamline corporate resources and improve internal efficiency, with a particular focus on manufacturing and sales.

    Seasonality of Operating Results


    Historically, our revenues were not materially impacted by seasonal variations. During the first several years of our operation, manufacturing capacities fell short of customer demands. As such, seasonality was minimal. Over the past year, we significantly increased manufacturing capacities to meet or exceed customer demand. Since we increased our manufacturing capacities, our revenues are now affected by seasonal variations in customer demand. We expect to experience seasonal lows in the demand for our products during the months of April to July, reflecting our customers’ decreased purchases. On the other hand, we will generally experience seasonal peaks during the months of September to March, primarily as a result of increased purchases from our customers. Also, at various times during the year, our inventories may be increased in anticipation of increased demand for consumer electronics. The months of October and February tend to be seasonally low sales months due to plant closures for national holidays and the Chinese New Year and national holidays in the PRC.


    58


    Controls and Procedures


    First Restatement


    In the course of the SEC review of registration statements on Form SB-2 (File Nos. 333-122209 and 333-130247), we restated on January 30, 2006, pursuant to Amendment No.1 to our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2004, our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, our consolidated statements of cash flows and our consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, and also extended or modified certain notes to these consolidated financial statements. This restatement arose out of accounting errors relating to (1) misclassification of cash transactions, (2) incorrect charging to our statements of income and comprehensive income and comprehensive income for fiscal 2003 and 2004 for the deficit attributable to 1,152,456 shares outstanding prior to our reverse merger on January 20, 2005, and (3) incorrect presentation of depreciation expenses in the statement of income and comprehensive income. The restatement resulted in an increase in net cash from financing activities, a decrease in the amount of common stock outstanding and a corresponding increase in paid-in capital, and a decrease in gross profit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 by $1,635,971, or approximately 11%.


    Second Restatement


    In the course of the SEC review of the registration statements referred to above, we determined that beginning with fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, we would no longer be considered a “small business issuer.” We restated on March 29, 2006, pursuant to Amendment No.2 to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, our consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income and our consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2005 to reflect the prospective adoption of SFAS 123R123(R), now included in ASC Topic 718, relating to the accounting for stock- basedstock-based compensation commencing in the first quarter of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2006. Pursuant to the restatement, we recognized incremental share-based compensation expense of $711,512 in the quarter ended December 31, 2005. This restatement resulted in among other things, a decrease in gross profit and net income per share for the first quarter of our fiscal year 2006.


    Third Restatement


    As reported in the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2006, we changed our independent registered public accounting firm from Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP to KPMG. We engaged KPMG on May 15, 2006 to audit our previously reported financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005. During the course of the audit, KPMG notified our accounting staff of misstatements in our previously reported financial statements for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005 that required correction relating to: (1) the overstatement of interest expense because of an error in the application of accounting principles relating to interest capitalization, and the related understatement of property, plant and equipment, construction in progress and depreciation expenses;expense; (2) the incorrect charging to shareholders’ equity for fiscal year 2005 of the provision for staff and workers’ bonus and welfare fund instead of charging it to the statements of income and comprehensive income; (3) the overstatement of the provision for contributions to a social insurance plan because of a misinterpretation of the applicable PRC laws; (4) the understatement of our accumulated foreign-currency translation adjustment for fiscal 2005 included in comprehensive income and overstatement of our additional paid-in capital due to a calculation error during consolidation; (5) other misstatements identified, which were individually not material, including amounts related to amortization of lease prepayments, prepayments and other receivables, accrued expenses and other payables, cost of revenues, general and administrative expenses, finance costs, other expenses, and certain cash flow items, and (6) the consequential understatements or overstatements of income tax expenses. The net restatement adjustments resulting from these accounting misstatements resulted in an increase in our net income and earnings per share for the fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.

    53

    59


    Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2006, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2006 Form 10-K. Our management also concluded that our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endeddisclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2006 (the “20062007, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2007 Form 10-K”).10-K. Management believesbelieved that some appropriate measures havehad been implemented to remediate these weaknesses during the fiscal year 2007.2007, as described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2007 Form 10-K. However, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were still not effective as of September 30, 2008, because of the material weaknesses that had been identified and described in Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the 2008 Form 10-K. Investors are directed to Item 9A of the 2006 Form 10-K, the 2007 Form 10-K, and the 2008 Form 10-K for the description of these weaknesses.

    the weaknesses identified for the corresponding fiscal year, and to Item 9A of the 2007 Form 10-K and Item 9A of the 2008 Form 10-K for the description of the measures that had been implemented during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

    As disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007, as amended on April 11, 2007 and April 17, 2007, on March 28, 2007 we dismissed KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm and appointed PKF as our independent registered public accounting firm, in each case effective April 1, 2007.

    Our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 20072009 covered by our Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. We have identified the following material weaknesses as of September 30, 2007:


    1.Entity Level Material Weakness - Control Environment

    We2009:

    • The Company did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting processesprocess due to an insufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAPgenerally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) commensurate with ourthe Company’s financial requirements. Additionally, ourthe Company’s senior management lacked an adequate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP, and did not implement adequate and proper supervisory review to ensure the consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and with SEC requirements.

    requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
    2.Process Level Material Weakness - Procedures and transactions

    We
  • The Company did not maintain adequate procedures to properly accounteffective controls over the accounting for deferred taxes under U.S. GAAP.construction in progress assets and the determination of depreciation expenses when the assets are ready for their intended use. Specifically, wethe Company did not have effective control procedures overcontrols to track and assess the identificationready-for-intended-use status of the construction in progress assets to ensure the construction in progress assets being transferred to property, plant and measurement of differences between the respective tax and financial reporting bases of certain assets and liabilitiesequipment and the determinationrelated commencement of the applicable income tax rate to ensure that deferred taxes were accurately presenteddepreciation expense was in our consolidated financial statements. This material weakness resulted in a material adjustment to our preliminary consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2007. The need for this adjustment was initially identified by our external auditor and subsequently implemented by our management.


  • accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    See Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” for a more detailed discussion of these material weaknesses.


    Financial Statement Presentation


    Net revenues. Our net revenues represent the invoiced value of our products sold, net of value added taxes, or VAT, sales returns, trade discounts and allowances. We are subject to VAT, which is levied on most of our products at the rate of 17% on the invoiced value of our products. Provision for sales returns are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period that revenue is recognized. The provision for sales returns represents our best estimate of the amount of goods that will be returned from our customers based on historical sales returns data.

    54

    The following table sets forth the breakdown of our net revenues by battery cell type for the periods indicated.

      
    Year ended September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
      
    (in thousands)
     
    Prismatic cells       
    Steel-case cells  34,869  64,299  56,965 
    Aluminum-case cells  69,916  49,514  23,721 
    Battery packs  11,798  9,843  20,169 
    Cylindrical cells  3,422  608  1,051 
    High-power lithium-phosphate cells  
    20,562
      
    18,537
      
    ó
     
    Lithium polymer cells  5,294  1,028  16 
    Total  145,861  143,829  101,922 

    Our net revenues have increased during fiscal 2005, 2006, and 2007, in part because of increased shipments as we ramped up our production capacity to meet customer demands for our products.

    Cost of Revenues.Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of material costs, employee remuneration for staff engaged in production activity, share-based compensation, depreciation and related expenses that are directly attributable to the production of products. Cost of revenues also includes write-downs of inventory to lower of cost or market.


    The cost of raw materials for aluminum-case cells generally is higher than that of steel-case cells. Cost of revenues from the sales of battery packs also includes the fees we pay to pack manufacturers for assembling our prismatic cells into battery packs.

    The average unit costs of our products increased significantly in the year ended September 30, 2007 because the purchase cost of lithium cobalt dioxide increased. As a result, our gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, decreased from 27.6% for the year ended September 30, 2006 to 17.6% for the year ended September 30, 2007.

    Our gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, increased from 25.4% in fiscal year 2005 to 27.6% in fiscal year 2006. This is mainly attributable to (1) the decrease in unit manufacturing costs as a result of scale of economy which outweighed the effect of decrease in selling prices; and (2) the introduction of new products with higher gross profit margins than average, such as battery packs in 2005 and high-power lithium-phosphate cells in 2006.

    60


    Research and Development Costs.Expenses. Research and development costsexpenses primarily comprise of remuneration for R&D staff, share-based compensation, depreciation and maintenance expenses relating to R&D equipment, and R&D material costs.


    Sales and Marketing.Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of remuneration for staff involved in selling and marketing efforts, including staff engaged in the packaging of goods for shipment, advertising cost, depreciation, share-based compensation and travel and entertainment expenses. We do not pay slotting fees to retail companies for displaying our products, engage in cooperative advertising programs, participate in buy-down programs or similar arrangements. No material estimates are required by management to determine our actual marketing or advertising costs for any period.


    General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee remuneration, share-based compensation, professional fees, insurance, benefits, general office expenses, depreciation, liquidated damage charge and bad debt expenses.


    Gain on Trading Securities.  Gain on trading securities represents realized gain from purchases and sales of certain listed shares in open market of Hong Kong Stock Exchange. These transactions were concluded by BAK International Limited, our Hong Kong subsidiary. As of September 30, 2007, we and our subsidiaries do not hold any equity or debt securities on hand for trading purpose. We do not anticipate investment in trading securities to form an ongoing part of our treasury function.

    Government Grant Income / Other Expenses.Expenses / (Other Income). Government grant income for the year ended September 30, 20072009 mainly consisted of receipt of grant funds to reward Shenzhen BAK for its contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior yearspayment for research and development activities and to refund the value-added tax paid by Shenzhenland use rights of BAK in prior years in light of Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as a new and high-technology enterprise.Industrial Park. No present or future obligation would arisearises from the receipt of such amount.

    55

    Finance Costs, Net. Finance costs consist primarily of interest income, interest on bank loans, net of capitalized interest, and bank charges.


    Income Taxes.Taxes. Under applicablePRC income tax laws and regulations, before January 1, 2008, a foreign-invested enterprise, or FIE, was generally subject to an enterprise locatedincome tax rate of 33.0%, which included a 30% state income tax and a 3.0% local income tax. However, from at least calendar year 2002 through calendar year 2007, an enterprise recognized as a “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Shenzhen, including the district where our operations are located, is subjectSpecial Economic Zone” under PRC tax law was entitled to a 15% enterprisepreferential income tax. Further, according to PRC laws and regulations, foreign investedtax rate of 15%. Moreover, a foreign-invested manufacturing enterprises,enterprise, starting from theirits first profitable calendar year areafter offset of accumulated taxable losses, was entitled to a two-year exemption from enterprise income tax followed by a three-year 50% reduction in its enterprise income tax rate. OurAn enterprise qualified for such treatment may receive a further tax rate reduction related to the size of qualified capital contributions received. In addition, from at least calendar year 2002 through calendar year 2007, an enterprise qualified as an “advanced technology enterprise” under PRC subsidiaries, tax law was also entitled to a 50% reduction of income taxes.

    Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronic,Electronics are both registered and operate in Shenzhen, the PRC, and are each recognized as “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Special Economic Zone”. As a result, they have been entitled to a two-year exemption from enterprise income tax and a reducedpreferential enterprise income tax rate of 7.5% for15%. In accordance with the following three years from its first profitable year. As such, for the first two calendar years ended December 31, 2003, Shenzhen BAK was exempted from any enterprise income tax. Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2006, Shenzhen BAK was subject to the enterpriserelevant income tax ratelaws, the profits of 7.5%. BAK Electronic, established in August 2005, is eligible for the same preferential tax treatment applicable to Shenzhen BAK and is currently in itsBAK Electronics were fully exempted from income tax for two years from the first profitable calendar year of operations after offset of accumulated taxable losses, followed by a 50% exemption for the immediate next three calendar years (the “tax holiday”).

    The tax holiday of Shenzhen BAK commenced in 2002, the first calendar year in which Shenzhen BAK had assessable profit, and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax. BAK Tianjin is currently exempt from any enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.


    ended on December 31, 2006. In addition, due to the additional capital invested incontributed by BAK International to Shenzhen BAK in both 2005 and 2006 and Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as an advanced technology enterprise in 2007 and 2008, Shenzhen BAK was granted a preferential income tax rate of 3.309%7.5%, 3.82%11.8% and 6.12%12.6% for calendar years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In accordance with the transition period of the new corporate income tax law (the “New CIT Law”) and before considering the above-mentioned tax concessions, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rate for calendar years 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rates after consideration of its tax concessions are expected to be 15% for both calendar years 2010 and 2011and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%.

    61


    BAK Electronics, established in August 2005, has been eligible for the same preferential tax treatment previously applicable to Shenzhen BAK and was in the tax holiday and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax for calendar years 2006 and 2007 respectively.


    Furthermore, to encourage foreign investors to introduce advanced technologies to China, the PRC government has offered additional tax incentives to enterprises that are classified asfollowed by a foreign invested enterprise with advanced technologies. According to an official notice issued by the Shenzhen Municipal Trade and Industry Bureau, Shenzhen BAK received such designationthree-year 50% reduction in August 2005. As a result, as long as Shenzhen BAK maintains this designation, it may apply to the tax authority to extend the preferential status of its enterprise income tax rate. In addition, pursuant to the transition period of the New CIT Law and before considering the above-mentioned 50% reduction, BAK Electronics’ income tax rates for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 20%, 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, BAK Electronics’ income tax rate after consideration of its tax holiday are expected to be 10%, 11% and 24% for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. BAK Electronics did not incur any enterprise income tax for the current year due to the current tax losses carried forward from the calendar year 2008.

    Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics received in aggregate a tax benefit of $103,000 pursuant to their tax holiday and preferential tax rate for another three years, until December 31, 2009.


    the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, or $0.007 per basic share.

    BAK Tianjin is currently paying no enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.

    On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of the PRC determined to adopt a new corporate income tax law in its fifth plenary session.the New CIT Law. The new corporate income tax lawNew CIT Law unifies the application scope, tax rate, tax deduction and preferential policy for both domestic enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises.FIEs. The new corporate income tax law will beNew CIT Law became effective on January 1, 2008. According to the new corporate income tax law,New CIT Law, the applicable income tax rate for our operating subsidiariesShenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin will be 25% after their preferential tax holidays and the transition period have ended. During the transition period, tax rates for subject entities was 18% for the calendar year 2008, and is subjectexpected to change. As implementation details have not yet been announced, we cannot be sure20%, 22%, and 24% for the calendar years 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively, before the application of the potential impact of this new corporate incomeapplicable tax law on our financial position and operating results.


    Our company is subject to U.S.holidays or other tax at the statutory rate of 35%. We have not made provisions for any U.S. tax because we have determined that we have no U.S. taxable income.

    preferences.

    Our Canada subsidiary, BAK Canada, is subject to Canada profits tax at the rate of 36.1%38%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Canada, it has not paid any Canada estimated profits tax.


    Our German subsidiary, BAK Europe, is subject to Germany’s profits tax at the rate of 25%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Germany, it has not paid any German profits tax.

    Our India subsidiary, BAK India, is subject to India profits tax at the rate of 30%. However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in India, it has not paid any Indian profits tax.

    Our Hong Kong subsidiary, BAK International, is subject to Hong Kong profits tax at the rate of 17.5%16.5% . However, because it does not have any assessable income derived from or arising in Hong Kong, it has not paid any Hong Kong profits tax.


    Our effective tax rates were 4.6%benefit rate was 67.9%, 11.6%, and 2.9%8.2% for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20052007, 2008 and 2006, respectively2009, respectively.

    Pursuant to the Provisional Regulation of China on Value Added Tax and its implementing rules, all entities and individuals that are engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of repairs and replacement services and the importation of goods in China are generally required to pay VAT at a rate of 17.0% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by the taxpayer. Further, when exporting goods, the exporter is entitled to some or all of the refund of VAT that it has already paid or borne. Our imported raw materials that are used for manufacturing export products and are deposited in bonded warehouses are exempt from import VAT.

    Results of Operations

    The following table sets forth key components of our effective tax benefit rate was 67.9%results of operations for the years indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of our revenue. All amounts, other than percentages, are in thousands of U.S. dollars.

    62



     Fiscal year ended September 30,
           
     200920082007
        As a As a
      As a percentage percentage
     Allpercentage ofAllof netAllof net
     amountsnet revenuesamountsrevenuesamountsrevenues
     (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages)
    Statement ofoperations data:

    Net revenues

    $

    211,144



    100%


    $

    245,348



    100%


    $

    145,861



    100%


    Cost of revenues

    $

    184,388



    87.3%


    $

    214,442



    87.4%


    $

    120,255



    82.4%


    Gross profit

    $

    26,756



    12.7%


    $

    30,906



    12.6%


    $

    25,606



    17.6%


    Operating expenses:


















    Research and development expenses$5,6442.7%$6,2522.5%$3,9572.7%
    Sales and marketing expenses$6,1762.9%$5,8032.4%$4,6963.2%
    General and administrative expenses$21,98910.4%$19,3477.9%$12,3728.5%
                       
    Total operating expenses$33,80916.0%$31,40212.8%$21,02514.4%

    Operating (loss) / income

    $

    (7,053

    )


    (3.3%

    )

    $

    (496

    )


    (0.2%

    )

    $

    4,581



    3.2%


    Finance Costs, Net

    $

    9,356



    4.4%


    $

    11,021



    4.5%


    $

    5,225



    3.6%

    Other (income) / expenses$(528)(0.3%)$(757)(0.2%)$1030.1%
    Government grant income$6360.3%$1,7740.7%$1,0350.7%
    Income tax benefit$(1,253)(0.6%)$(1,045)(0.4%)$(195)(0.1%)
                       
    Net (loss) / income$ (13,992) (6.6%)$ (7,941) (3.2%)$ 483  0.3 % 

    Results of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

    56

    Results of Operations

    The following sets forth certain income statement information for2009 as compared to the yearsfiscal year ended September 30, 2005, 20062008.

    The following table sets forth the breakdown of our net revenues by battery cell type for the periods indicated.

      Year ended September 30, 
      2009  2008 
      (in thousands of U.S. 
      dollars) 
    Prismatic cells      
             Aluminum-case cells$ 111,700 $ 130,110 
             Battery packs$ 24,705 $ 25,500 
             Steel-case cells$ 4,980 $ 29,300 
    Cylindrical cells$ 55,349 $ 42,567 
    Lithium polymer cells$ 14,230 $ 17,871 
    High-power lithium-phosphate cells$ 180 $ - 
           
                       Total$ 211,144 $ 245,348 

    63



    Net Revenues. Net revenues were $211.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $245.3 million for the same period of the prior year, a decrease of $34.2 million or 13.9% .

    • Net revenues from sales of aluminum-case cells decreased to $111.7 million in the year ended September 30, 2009, from $130.1 million in the same period in fiscal year 2008, a decrease of $18.4 million or 14.1%, due to a 12.8% decrease in sales volume driven by decreased sales to the OEM market in the PRC resulting from the global financial crisis and 2007. 


      
    Year ended September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
      
    All amounts
     
    As a percentage of net revenues
     
    All amounts
     
    As a percentage of net revenues
     
    All amounts
     
    As a percentage of net revenues
     
      
     (in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
     
    Statement of operations data:
                 
                  
    Net Revenues  145,861  100% 143,829  100% 101,922  100%
                        
    Cost of Revenues  120,255  82.4% 104,196  72.4% 76,047  74.6%
                        
    Gross profit  25,606  17.6% 39,633  27.6% 25,875  25.4%
                        
    Operating Expenses                   
    Research and development costs  3,957  2.7% 2,935  2.0% 542  0.5%
    Sales and marketing expenses  4,696  3.2% 5,055  3.5% 3,855  3.8%
    General and administrative expenses  12,372  8.5% 9,071  6.3% 5,994  5.9%
    Total Operating Expenses  21,025  14.4% 17,061  11.9% 10,391  10.2%
                        
    Operating Income  4,581  3.2% 22,572  15.7% 15,484  15.2%
                        
    Finance costs, net  5,225  3.6% 1,888  1.3% 845  0.9%
    Other expenses  103  0.1% 205  0.1% 490  0.5%
    Gain on trading securities  -  -  279  0.2% -  - 
    Government grant income  1,035  0.7% -  -  -  - 
    Income Taxes expenses / (benefit)  (195) (0.1%) 593  0.4% 652  0.6%
                        
    Net income  483  0.3% 20,165  14.0% 13,497  13.2%

    Resultsrecession, and by a 1.5% decrease in the average selling price resulting from a change in the type of operationsthe aluminum-case cells sold.

  • Net revenues from sales of battery packs decreased to $24.7 million in the year ended September 30, 2009, from $25.5 million in the same period in fiscal year 2008, a decrease of $796,000 or 3.1%, due a decrease in our average selling price of 4.2% driven by decreased sales to customers in the OEM market in the PRC which have been hurt by the global financial crisis and recession and offset by a 5.1% increase in the sales volume due to increased export sales.

  • Net revenues from the sales of steel-case cells decreased to $5.0 million in the year ended September 30, 2009 from $29.3 million in the same period in 2008, a decrease of $24.3 million or 83.0%. This decrease was due to reduced sales volume of 80.7%, which was primarily attributable to our long-term strategic reduction, and suspension in January 2009, of steel-case cell production which was designed to increase our production capacity of aluminum-case cells for sale to the OEM market and to take advantage of the greater sales prospects and lower costs of aluminum-case cells. During the year ended September 30, 2009, the price and profit margin of steel-case cells were lower than those of aluminum-case cells and market demand for aluminum-case cells was stronger than for steel-case cells. As a result, we suspended our production of steel-case cells in January 2009. We expect that our revenue will be positively impacted by this shift.

  • Net revenues from sales of cylindrical cells increased to $55.3 million in the year ended September 30, 2009, from $42.6 million in the same period in fiscal year 2008, an increase of $12.8 million or 30.0%, due to an increase in sales volume of 54.2% driven by increased export sales and offset by a decrease in our average selling price of 15.7%.

  • We sold $14.3 million of lithium polymer cells for the year ended September 30, 20072009, compared to $17.9 million of lithium polymer cells in the same period in 2008, due to a decrease of 25.1% in sales volume offset by an increase of 6.3% in our average selling price as compareda result of a decline in market demand relating to the global financial crisis and recession.

  • We also sold approximately $180,000 of high-power lithium-phosphate cells in the year ended September 30, 2006.


  • Net Revenues.  Net2009, as compared to no sales of this battery cell type in the same period of fiscal year 2008, due to our sale of samples used in electric bicycles, power tools, uninterruptible power supplies, and other applications from our Tianjin facility.

    Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues increaseddecreased to $145.9$184.4 million for the year ended September 30, 20072009, as compared to $143.8$214.4 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $30.1 million or 14.0% . The decrease in cost of revenues correlated with a decrease in sales volume over the year ended September 30, 2009.

    As a result, gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2009 was $26.8 million or 12.7% of net revenues as compared to gross profit of $30.9 million or 12.6% of net revenues for the same period in 2008. The slight increase in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues was mainly due to a significant increase in the sales of cylindrical cells to customers in the laptop computer market, and an increase in our average selling price, which together generated a slightly higher gross margin, during the year ended September 30, 2009.

    64


    Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased to $5.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $6.3 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $608,000 or 9.7%, due to a number of decreases in R&D-related costs over the year ended September 30, 2009. Equity-based compensation included in R&D costs decreased by $521,000 as charges relating to outstanding stock options to R&D staff had already been reflected in large part in fiscal periods prior to fiscal year 2009. Depreciation charges increased by $11,000 and research materials charges decreased by $357,000, mainly due to the reduction in work hours during the year ended September 30, 2009. Salaries related to R&D staff increased by $19,000, primarily due to additional compensation charges from severance packages relating to reduction of headcount. Research technical support decreased by $338,000 due to the suspension of a research project during fiscal year 2009.

    Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $6.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $5.8 million for the same period in 2009, an increase of $374,000 or 6.4%, primarily due to a $107,000 increase in packing expenses which increased in line with increased export sales. Equity-based compensation included in sales and marketing expenses increased by $75,000 due to compensation charges applied to the grant of stock options to employees in our sales department on June 22, 2009. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses have increased to 2.9% for the year ended September 30, 2009, from 2.4% for the same period in 2008, due to the decrease in revenues from sales offset by lower overall sales expenses.

    General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $22.0 million, or 10.4% of revenues, for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $19.3 million, or 7.9% of revenues, for the same period in 2008, an increase of $2.6 million or 13.7% . Equity-based compensation included in general and marketing expenses increased by $225,000 due to compensation charges applied to the grant of stock options to our administrative staff on June 22, 2009. Bad debt expenses increased by $5.8 million due to the provision charged after we had assessed the collection of accounts receivables from customers during the year ended September 30, 2009. We recognized exchange loss of $49,000 for the year ended September 30, 2009, compared with $1.3 million for the same period in fiscal year 2008.

    In addition, we are liable for liquidated damages to certain shareholders whose shares were included in a resale registration statement on Form S-3 that we filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we entered into with such shareholders in relation to a private placement that we closed in November 2007. The SEC did not declare this registration statement effective by a certain date, and under the November 2007 registration rights agreement, the included selling shareholders became eligible for liquidated damages of approximately $561,000 as of September 30, 2008. Please see Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings — Liquidated Damages Pursuant to November 2007 Registration Rights Agreement” for a further description of these liquidated damages. We therefore recognized in general and administrative expenses an amount of approximately $561,000 for the liquidated damages for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

    On August 26, 2008, we conducted a registered direct offering of 4,102,564 shares of common stock, at an offering price of $3.90 per share, in which the investors also received warrants to purchase up to 4,102,564 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.90 per share. With one exception, all of the investors that participated in our November 2007 private placement, or affiliates of them, participated in our August 2008 registered direct offering. We reduced each of these investors’ (or each such investor’s participating affiliate’s) purchase price by an amount that was at least equal to the amount that we determined that we were liable for as liquidated damages to such investor (or its participating affiliate). As of June 30, 2009, the remaining investor had waived any and all rights relating to liquidated damages pursuant to the November 2007 registration rights agreement. As of September 30, 2009, approximately $159,000 of liquidated damages were recognized as general and administrative expenses.  Pursuant to the settlements described above, however, we do not believe that we are actually liable for this amount.

    As described under Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings — Make Good Settlements” we have entered into settlement agreements pursuant to which we have issued shares to certain shareholders that purchased shares in a January 20, 2005 private placement transaction in settlement of claims related to the private placement, including claims for liquidated damages. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, the claims of each shareholder are released as of the applicable “release date” which occurred on June 26, 2008, the date the resale registration statement we filed relating to resales by the settling shareholders of the shares issued pursuant to the settlement agreement was declared effective by the SEC. We expect such settlements may result in gains in one or more future periods in accordance with their waivers of claims to liquidated damages.

    65


    Operating Loss. As a result of the above, operating loss totaled $7.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to operating loss of $497,000 for the same period of the prior fiscal year, an increase of $6.6 million or 1,320%. As a percentage of net revenues, operating loss was 3.3% for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to operating loss of 0.2% for the same period of the prior fiscal year.

    Finance Costs, Net. Finance costs, net, decreased to $9.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $11.0 million for the same period of the prior year, a decrease of $1.7 million or 15.1% . We have $139.2 million in short-term bank loans maturing in less than one year, $16.1 million in long-term bank loans maturing within one year, and $39.5 million in other long-term bank loans maturing in more than one year, outstanding as of September 30, 2009, as compared to $105.6 million in short-term bank loans maturing in less than one year, $8.8 million in long-term bank loans maturing in more than one year, and $55.7 million in other long-term bank loans maturing in more than one year, outstanding as of September 30, 2008. The decrease in net finance costs is mainly attributable to a decrease in the average bank loan interest rates on both our short-term and long-term bank loans during the year ended September 30, 2009, although the outstanding principal amounts of both our short-term and long-term bank loans increased.

    Government Grant Income/Other Expenses/(Other Income). Government grant income was $636,000 for the year ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.8 million for the same period of 2008. Government grant income for the year ended September 30, 2009 mainly consisted of government grant funds of $402,000 to reward Shenzhen BAK for its contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and the amortization of deferred revenue of $234,000 in respect of the government subsidies received for the additional cost of land use rights for BAK Industrial Park. No present or future obligation arises from the receipt of such government subsidies. Government grant income was $1.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. Government grant income for the year ended September 30, 2008 mainly consisted of government grant funds of $1.0 million to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior years for R&D activities, of $492,000 to reward Shenzhen BAK for its contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and the amortization of deferred revenue in respect of the government subsidies received for additional costs of land use rights for BAK Industrial Park.

    Income Tax Benefit. Income tax benefit was $1.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $1.0 million for the same period of 2008. The change was the result of a deferred tax provision during the year ended September 30, 2009.

    Net Loss.As a result of the foregoing, we had a net loss of $14.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2009, compared to $7.9 million for the same period of 2008.

    Results of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

    The following table sets forth the breakdown of our net revenues by battery cell type for the periods indicated.

      Year ended September 30, 
      2008  2007 
      (in thousands of U.S. 
      dollars) 
    Prismatic cells      
             Aluminum-case cells$ 130,110 $ 69,916 
             Battery packs$ 25,500 $ 11,798 
             Steel-case cells$ 29,300 $ 34,869 
    Cylindrical cells$ 42,567 $ 3,422 
    Lithium polymer cells$ 17,871 $ 5,294 
    High-power lithium-phosphate cells$ - $ 20,562 
           
                      Total$ 245,348 $ 145,861 

    66


    Net Revenues. Net revenues increased to $245.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $145.9 million for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $2.1$99.4 million or 1.5%68.2% .

    Net revenues from the sales of steel-case cells decreased to $34.9 million in the year ended September 30, 2007 from $64.3 million in the same period in 2006, a decrease of $29.4 million or 45.7%, due to a decrease in sales volume of 39.9% primarily attributable to an increasingly competitive market.
    Net revenues from the sales of aluminum-case cells increased to $69.9 million in the year ended September 30, 2007 from $49.5 million in the same period in 2006, an increase of $20.4 million or 41.2%, due to an increase in sales volume of 28.3% driven by increased sales to OEM market in the PRC and an increase in average selling price of 10.1% as the result of a change in the type of the aluminum-case cells.
    Net revenues from sales of battery packs increased to $11.8 million in year ended September 30, 2007 from $9.8 million in the same period in 2006, due to an increase in sales volume of 47.8% driven by increased sales to the OEM market in the PRC and offset by a decrease in our average selling price of 18.9%.
    Net revenues from the sales of high-power lithium-ion cells increased to $20.6 million in the year ended September 30, 2007 from $18.5 million in the same period in 2006, an increase of $2.0 million or 10.9%, due to an increase in sales volume of 32.7% driven by increased export sales and offset by a decrease in average selling price of 16.4%.
    We also sold $5.3 million of lithium polymer cells and $3.4 million of cylindrical cells in the year ended September 30, 2007, compared to $1.0 million of lithium polymer cells and $608,000 of cylindrical cells in the same period in 2006 due to our ability to satisfy additional demand with our new production line.
    57


  • Net revenues from the sales of aluminum-case cells increased to $130.1 million in the year ended September 30, 2008 from $69.9 million in the same period in 2007, an increase of $60.2 million or 86.1%, due to a 65.5% increase in sales volume, driven by increased sales to the OEM market in the PRC, and a 12.5% increase in our average selling price.

  • Net revenues from sales of battery packs increased to $25.5 million in year ended September 30, 2008 from $11.8 million in the same period in 2007, an increase of $13.7 million or 116.2%, due to a 73.7% increase in sales volume and a 24.4% increase in average selling price, driven by increased sales to the OEM market in the PRC.

  • Net revenues from the sales of cylindrical cells increased to $42.6 million in the year ended September 30, 2008 from $3.4 million in the same period in 2007, an increase of $39.2 million or 1143.9%, due to a 213.1% increase in sales volume and a 70.5% increase in average selling price, driven by increased exports.

  • We also sold $17.9 million of lithium polymer cells for the year ended September 30, 2008, compared to $5.3 million of lithium polymer cells in the same period in 2007, an increase of $12.6 million or 237.5%, due to our ability to meet additional demand by increasing production.

  • We had no sales of high-power lithium-ion for the year ended September 30, 2008, compared to $20.6 million in the same period in 2007, primarily due to the termination of our manufacturing agreement with A123Systems in August 2007.

  • Cost of Revenues.  Revenues. Cost of revenues increased to $120.3$214.4 million for the year ended September 30, 2007,2008, as compared to $104.2$120.3 million for the same period in 2006,2007, an increase of $16.1million$94.1 million or 15.5%78.3% . The increase in cost of revenues was mainly attributabledue to a significant increase in the purchase cost of lithium cobalt dioxide, and significantly increased depreciation charges with the completion of two new production lines.


    main raw material in our products.

    As a result, gross profit for the year ended September 30, 20072008 was $25.6$30.9 million or 17.6%12.6% of net revenues as compared to gross profit of $39.6$25.6 million or 27.6%17.6% of net revenues for the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues was primarily due to the significant increase in the cost of lithium cobalt dioxide.

    The average unit costs of our products was higher in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, mainly because the purchase cost of lithium cobalt dioxide increased. Lithium cobalt dioxide is the main material in our products, rechargeable lithium batteries. In addition, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, there was a trend of increasing costs relating to overhead, other raw materials, transportation, labor, and other business costs. As a result, our gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, decreased from 27.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and 17.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 to 12.6% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Likewise, net loss for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 was $7.9 million as compared to net income of $483,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and net income of $20.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.


    We believe that the average price of lithium cobalt dioxide in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, which was approximately 65.2% higher than the average price of lithium cobalt dioxide during the same period of fiscal year 2007 and 118.7% higher than the average price of lithium cobalt dioxide during the same period of fiscal year 2006, will fluctuate and may continue to increase in the short run.To the extent that we are not able to fully reflect these increased costs in our prices or use alternative less costly materials, our gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, may decrease.

    67


    Research and Development Costs.  Expenses. Research and development costsexpenses increased to $4.0$6.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2007,2008, as compared to $2.9$4.0 million for the same period in 2006. Share-based compensation included in research and development expenses was $1.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2007. Research and development material expenses increased by $514,000 due to certain new research projects of BAK Canada. Salaries related to researchR&D staff increased to $1.3$2.4 million from $702,000$1.3 million for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $1.1 million, primarily due to our hiring of additional R&D professionals. Share-based compensation included in R&D expenses increased by $267,000 due to new stock options granted to the employees in our R&D department on June 25, 2007, January 28, 2008 and May 29, 2008. The cost of depreciation, mainly concerning R&D equipment at BAK Canada and BAK Tianjin, increased by $172,000, and the cost of research professionals.


    materials increased by $259,000.

    Sales and Marketing Expenses.  Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreasedincreased to $4.7$5.8 million for the year ended September 30, 20072008 as compared to $5.1$4.7 million for the same period in 2006,2007, an increase of $1.1 million or 23.6%, primarily due to a decrease of $359,000 or 7.1%.$380,000 increase in salaries and a $614,000 increase in packing expenses due to increased sales. Share-based compensation included in sales and marketing expenses decreased by $89,000. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses have decreased slightly to 3.2%2.4% for the year ended September 30, 2007,2008, from 3.5%3.2% for the same period in 2006. Share-based compensation was $224,0002007.

    General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $19.3 million, or 7.9% of revenues, for the year ended September 30, 2007, a decrease of $514,000 from $738,000 for the same period in 2006. On September 28, 2006, options to purchase a total of 1,400,000 shares of common stock were cancelled and on December 26, 2006, a total of 914,994 shares of restricted stock were granted2008 as replacement awards. Pursuant to SFAS 123R, we also measured the employee share-based compensation at grant-date fair value as of December 26, 2006 and recognized over the remained vesting period.


    General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increasedcompared to $12.4 million, or 8.5% of revenues, for the same period in 2007, an increase of $7.0 million or 56.4% . Share-based compensation included in general and administrative expenses increased by $899,000 due to new stock options granted to the employees in our general administration department on June 25, 2007, January 28, 2008 and May 29, 2008. We also recognized an exchange loss of $1.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2007 as compared2008. Salaries and welfare increased by $1.3 million in the aggregate due to $9.1 million, or 6.3% of revenues, for the same period in 2006, an increase of $3.3 million or 36.4%. Depreciation chargesin average salaries paid. Audit fees, legal fees and consultant fees also increased by $1.0 millionUS$442,000 due to the completion of additional facilities in our industrial park. Bad debt expenses increased by $2.4 million primarily due to a provision charged for one customer after we had assessed the collection of accounts receivables from this customer during the third quarter of 2007.

    two securities offerings consummated on November 9, 2007 and August 26, 2008, respectively.

    We are liable for liquidated damages to certain shareholders whose shares were included in a resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that we filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we entered into with such shareholders in September 2005. On August 15, 2006, the SEC declared effective a post-effective amendment that we had filed on August 4, 2006, terminating the effectiveness of a resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that had been filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement with certain shareholders to register the resale of shares held by those shareholders. We subsequently filed a registration statementIn addition, on Form S-1 to register the shares of these shareholders. On December 8,19, 2006, we filed ourthe 2006 Form 10-K for fiscal year 2006.10-K. After the filing of the 2006 Form 10-K, our previously filed registration statement on Form S-1 was no longer available for resales by the selling shareholders whose shares were included in such Form S-1. Under the registration rights agreement, those selling shareholders became eligible for liquidated damages relating to the above two events totaling approximately $1 million from us. We therefore recognized in general and administrative expenses an amount of $760,000 as liquidated damages for the year ended September 30, 2007, as compared to $290,575the approximately $561,000 recognized as liquidated damages for the year ended September 30, 2006.


    2008 described below. Please see Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings — Liquidated Damages Pursuant to September 2005 Registration Rights Agreement” for a further description of these liquidated damages and related accounting treatment.

    In addition, we were liable for liquidated damages to certain shareholders whose shares were included in a resale registration statement on Form S-3 that we filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that we entered into with such shareholders in relation to a private placement that we closed in November 2007. The SEC did not declare this registration statement effective by a certain date, and under the November 2007 registration rights agreement, the included selling shareholders became eligible for liquidated damages of approximately $561,000 as of September 30, 2008. Please see Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings — Liquidated Damages Pursuant to November 2007 Registration Rights Agreement” for a further description of these liquidated damages. We therefore recognized in general and administrative expenses an amount of approximately $561,000 for the liquidated damages for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to approximately $760,000 for the same period in 2007.

    As described under Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings — Make Good Settlements” we have entered into settlement agreements pursuant to which we have issued shares to certain shareholders that purchased shares in a January 20, 2005 private placement transaction in settlement of claims related to the private placement, including claims for liquidated damages. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, the claims of each shareholder are released as of the applicable “release date” which occurred on June 26, 2008, the date the resale registration statement we filed relating to resales by the settling shareholders of the shares issued pursuant to the settlement agreement was declared effective by the SEC. We expect such settlements may result in gains in one or more future periods in accordance with their waivers of claims to liquidated damages.

    68


    Operating Income.  Income / (Loss). As a result of the above, operating incomeloss totaled $4.6 million$497,000 for the year ended September 30, 20072008, as compared to operating income of $22.6$4.6 million for the same period inof the prior fiscal year, a decrease of $18.0.million$5.1 million or 79.6%110.8% . As a percentage of net revenues, operating incomeloss was 3.2%0.2% for the year ended September 30, 20072008, as compared to 15.7%operating income of 3.2% for the same period of the prior fiscal year.


    Finance Costs, Net.  Net. Finance costs, net, increased to $5.2$11.0 million for the year ended September 30, 20072008 as compared to $1.9$5.2 million for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $3.3$5.8 million or 176.7%110.9% . We had $89.9$105.6 million in short-term bank loans and $29.3maturing in less than one year, $8.8 million ofin long-term bank loans as of September 30, 2007 as compared to $67.9maturing within one year, and $55.7 million in short-termother long-term bank loans and no long-term loansmaturing in more than one year, outstanding as of September 30, 2006.


    2008, as compared to $89.9 million in short-term bank loans maturing in less than one year and $29.3 million in long-term bank loans maturing in more than one year, outstanding as of September 30, 2007. The increase in net finance costs is also attributable to the increase in average bank loan interest rates on both our short-term and long-term bank loans and the increase in outstanding principal for both our short-term and long-term bank loans.

    Government Grant Income/Other Expenses /(Other Income). Government grant income/Other Expenses.  income was $1.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $1.0 million for the same period of 2007. Government grant income for the year ended September 30, 2008 mainly consisted of government grant funds of $1.0 million to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior years for R&D activities, of $492,000 to reward Shenzhen BAK for its contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and the amortization of deferred revenue in respect of the government subsidies received for the additional cost of land use rights for BAK Industrial Park. No present or future obligation arises from the receipt of such government subsidies. Government grant income was $1.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2007 as compared to other expenses of $205,000 for the same period of 2006.2007. Government grant income for the year ended September 30, 2007 mainly consisted of receipt of grant funds of $777,000 to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior years for research and development activities and $257,000 represented the refund of a value-added tax paid by Shenzhen BAK in prior years in light of Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as a new and high technology enterprise. No present or future obligation arises from the receipt of such government subsidy. There was no comparable income in the same period of the prior year.

    58

    Income tax expenses/(benefit)Tax Benefit. Income tax benefit was $195,000$1.0 million for the year ended September 30, 2007,2008, as compared to income tax expense of $593,000$195,000 for the same period of 2006.2007. The changeincrease was mainly the result of decreased profit before tax and the impact ofattributable to a deferred tax duringprovision for the fiscal year 2007.


    ended September 30, 2008.

    Net Income.  (Loss) / Income. As a result of the foregoing, we decreased ourhad a net income to $483,000 for the year ended September 30, 2007 from $20.2 million for the same periodloss of the prior year.


    Results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the year ended September 30, 2005.

    Net Revenues.  Net revenues increased to $143.8$7.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as2008, compared to $101.9 million for same perioda net income of the prior year, an increase of $41.9 million or 41.1%.

    Net revenues from the sales of steel-case cells increased to $64.3 million in the year ended September 30, 2006 from $57.0 million in the same period in 2005, an increase of $7.3 million or 12.8%, due to an increase in sales volume of 21.5%, as a result of higher demand in the replacement battery market in the PRC, which is offset by a decrease in average selling price of 7.1% primarily attributable to the pricing pressure in an increasingly competitive market.
    Net revenues from the sales of aluminum-case cells increased to $49.5 million in the year ended September 30, 2006 from $23.7 million in the same period in 2005, an increase of $25.8 million or 108.9%, due to an increase in sales volume of 120.7% driven by increased sales in the OEM market due to dramatic growth of the PRC cellular phone market, and is offset by a decrease in the average selling price of 5.5% attributable to pricing pressure in a competitive market.
    Net revenues from sales of battery packs decreased to $9.8 million in year ended September 30, 2006 from $20.2 million in the same period in 2005, due to both a decrease in sales volume of 15.1% and a decrease in average selling price of 42.5%. The decrease in average selling price primarily is attributable to a change in the type of the battery packs.
    We also sold $18.5 million of high-power lithium-ion cells and $1.0 million of lithium polymer cells in the year ended September 30, 2006, compared to nil in fiscal 2005.

    Cost of Revenues.  Cost of revenues increased to $104.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $76.0 million for the same period in 2005, an increase of $28.2 million or 37.1%. The increase in cost of revenues was attributable to an increase in units of products sold offset by a decrease in unit costs for prismatic cells and for battery packs. The decrease in unit manufacturing costs is primarily the result of a decrease in the cost of main raw materials, an increase in efficiency in our use of raw materials and our manufacturing yields resulting from our improvement in process technology and an increase in production output giving us a larger base over which to spread our fixed cost allocation. By product breakdown:

    unit cost of revenue for steel-case cells, decreased by 8.2%;
    unit cost of revenue for aluminum-case cells, decreased by 13.7%;
    unit cost of manufacturing battery packs, decreased by 45.4%;

    In addition, share-based compensation cost of $282,000 was recorded in costs of revenues for the year ended September 30, 2006. There was no such share-based compensation cost recognized in 2005.

    As a result, gross profit for the year ended September 30, 2006 was $39.6 million or 27.6% of net revenues as compared to gross profit of $25.9 million or 25.4% of net revenues for the same period in 2005. The increase in gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, was primarily due to (1) the increase in gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, for prismatic cells, resulting from a decrease in the unit manufacturing costs for prismatic cells due to economies of scale which outweighed the effect of decrease in selling prices; and (2) the introduction of a new product in fiscal year 2006, high-power lithium-phosphate cells with higher gross profit margin than average.
    59

    Research and Development Costs.  Research and development costs increased to $2.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $542,000 for the same period in 2005. Share-based compensation included in research and development expenses was $1,524,000 for the year ended September 30, 2006 compared to zero for the same in 2005. We adopted SFAS 123R effective on October 1, 2005 using the modified prospective approach. Pursuant to SFAS 123R, we measure the employee share-based compensation at grant-date fair value and recognize related expenses over the vesting period. Prior to adoption of SFAS 123R, we had adopted the intrinsic value method under SFAS 123 and APB 25, pursuant to which, no employee share-based compensation cost was recognized during fiscal year 2005. Depreciation expenses increased by $246,000 as we purchased more equipment for our R&D efforts. Salaries related to research increased to $703,000 from $162,000$483,000 for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $541,000, primarily due to hiring more experienced research employees.

    Sales and Marketing Expenses.  Sales and marketing expenses increased to $5.1 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $3.9 million for the same period in 2005, an increase of $1.2 million or 30.8%. Share-based compensation was $738,000 for the year ended September 30, 2006 due to the above-mentioned adoption of SFAS 123R on October 1, 2005. Higher sales volumes increased packaging and transportation costs by $521,000. Depreciation charges also increased by $158,000 due to the facilities expansion in the year ended September 30, 2006. As a percentage of net revenues, sales and marketing expenses have decreased slightly to 3.5% for the year ended September 30, 2006, from 3.8% for the same period in 2005, primarily attributable to an increase in net revenue.

    General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased to $9.1 million, or 6.3% of revenues, for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $6.0 million, or 5.9% of revenues, for the same period in 2005, an increase of $3.1 million or 51.7%. Share-based compensation included in general and administrative expenses was $1,792,000 for the year ended September 30, 2006 due to the above-mentioned adoption of SFAS 123R on October 1, 2005. Professional fees and expenses increased $2,253,000 from the year ended September 30, 2005, reflecting the additional costs in connection with the re-audit of the last three years’ financial statements and registration statement fee.

    On August 15, 2006, the SEC declared effective a post-effective amendment we filed on August 4, 2006 to terminate the effectiveness of the resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that included the resale of the shares held by those selling shareholders. On October 11, 2006, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 that covers resales of the shares held by those shareholders, which was declared to be effective on October 19, 2006.  Because the interval from August 15, 2006 to October 19, 2006 exceeds 30 trading days, those selling shareholders would be eligible for the liquidated damages of $487,946 from us. We therefore recognized in general and administrative expenses an amount of $290,575 for the liquidated damage which was incurred up to September 30, 2006. There was no comparable expense in the prior year.

    Operating Income.  As a result of the above, operating income totaled $22.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to operating income of $15.5 million for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $7.1 million or 45.8%. As a percentage of net revenues, operating income was 15.7% for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 15.2% for the same period of the prior year.

    Finance Costs, Net.  Finance costs, net, increased to $1.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $845,000 for the same period of the prior year, an increase of $1.0 million or 123.4%. We had $67.9 million in short term loans as of September 30, 2006 as compared to $39.5 million in short-term loans outstanding as of September 30, 2005.

    Other Expenses/Gain on Trading Securities.  Other expenses was $205,000 for year ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $490,000 for the same period of 2005. In addition, we recognized income of $279,000 from trading securities in the year ended September 30, 2006 from BAK International’s short-term investment in financial instruments during the period.

    60

    Income tax expenses.  Income tax expenses decreased to $593,000 for the year ended September 30, 2006, as compared to $652,000 for the same period of 2005. The decrease was the result of a decrease in income tax rate in calendar year 2006 due to the additional capital invested in Shenzhen BAK.

    Net Income.  As a result of the foregoing, we increased our net income to $20.2 million for the year ended September 30, 2007 from $13.5 million for the same period of the prior year.

    2007.

    Liquidity and Capital Resources


    We have historically financed our liquidity requirements from a variety of sources, including short-term bank loans, long-term bank loans and bills payable under bank credit agreements, sale of bills receivable and issuance of capital stock. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14.2$30.7 million, as compared to $21.1million$35.7 million as of September 30, 2006.2008. In addition, we had pledged deposits amounting to $4.6$31.1 million and $13.0$4.4 million at September 30, 20072009 and September 30, 2006,2008, respectively. Typically, banks will require borrowers to maintain deposits of approximately 20%10% to 100% of the outstanding loan balances and bills payable. The individual bank loans have maturities ranging from six to twelve months which coincides with the periods the cash remains pledged to the banks.


    We had access to $212.4 million in short-term credit facilities and $55.7 million in long-term credit facilities. As of September 30, 2009, the principal outstanding amounts included short-term bank loans of $131.9 million under credit facilities and $7.3 million separate from our credit facilities, long-term bank loans of $16.1 million maturing within one year and long-term bank loans of $39.6 million maturing in over one year, and bills payable of $30.9 million under credit facilities and $23.0 million separate from our credit facilities, leaving $49.6 million of short-term funds available under our credit facilities for additional cash needs. In addition, on July 10, 2008, our $60 million shelf registration statement was declared effective by the SEC, pursuant to which we had issued $16 million in securities as of September 30, 2009, giving us the potential to raise up to an additional aggregate $44 million in gross proceeds from additional equity financings.

    69


    The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:


      
    Year ended September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
      
    (In thousands)
     
    Net cash provided by / (used in) operating activities  2,986  (5,685) 8,015 
    Net cash used in investing activities  (65,895) (41,416) (30,596)
    Net cash provided by financing activities  55,244  35,047  52,363 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  762  98  62 
    Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalent  (6,903) (11,956) 29,844 
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period  21,100  33,056  3,212 
    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period  14,197  21,100  33,056 

      Year ended September 30, 
      2009  2008  2007 
      (In thousands of U.S. dollars) 
    Net cash provided by operating activities$ 38,391 $ 2,704 $ 2,986 
    Net cash used in investing activities$ (41,639)$ (50,551)$ (65,895)
    Net cash (used in) / provided by financing activities$ (1,623)$ 67,164 $ 55,244 
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents$(158)$2,193$762
    Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents$ (5,029)$ 21,510 $ (6,903)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period$ 35,707 $ 14,197 $ 21,100 
    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period$ 30,678 $ 35,707 $ 14,197 

    Operating Activities


    Net cash provided by operating activities was $3.0$38.4 million in the year ended September 30, 2007 compared with net cash used in operating activities of $5.7 million in the same period in 2006. The improvement of $8.7 million in operating activities was mainly attributable to better control of trade account receivables.


    Net cash used in operating activities was $5.7 million in the year ended September 30, 20062009 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $8.0$2.7 million in the same period in 2005.2008. The negative cash flowincrease of $35.7 million in operating activities was mainly the result of an increase in inventory levels asattributable to longer credit terms we increasedobtained from our production output in the year ended September 30, 2006, and also an increase in the level of our accounts receivable. However, we expect that our negative operating cash flow will improve due to our increased efforts to collect account receivables and to better control the inventory level taking into consideration increasing demand and business operation.

    Investing Activities

    suppliers.

    Net cash used in investingprovided by operating activities increased from $41.4was $2.7 million in the year ended September 30, 2006 to $65.92008 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $3.0 million in the same period in 2007. The decrease of $0.3 million provided by operating activities was mainly attributable to an increase in prepayments to our lithium cobalt dioxide suppliers. We purchased more lithium cobalt dioxide, the main raw material in our products, in anticipation of the higher future cost of lithium cobalt dioxide.

    Investing Activities

    Net cash used in investing activities decreased from $50.6 million in the year ended September 30, 2008 to $41.6 million in the same period in 2009. The net cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2009, was mainly used for procurement of machinery and equipment for two additional cylindrical cell lines, an additional automated prismatic cell production line and construction of new factories in Tianjin, China.

    Net cash used in investing activities decreased from $65.9 million in the year ended September 30, 2007 to $50.6 million in the same period in 2008. The net cash used in investing activities for the year ended September 30, 2008, was mainly due to the purchase ofused for purchasing equipment for a new automated cylindrical cell production line and a new automated prismatic cell production line and paying for the land use rights prepayments in Tianjin and Shenzhen.


    of BAK Industrial Park.

    Financing Activities

    Net cash used in investingfinancing activities increasedwas $1.6million in the year ended September 30, 2009 compared to $67.2 million provided by financing activities in the same period in 2008. This change was attributable to (i) net proceeds of $12.8 million from $30.6a private placement of our common stock completed in November 2007 and net proceeds of $15.0 million from a registered direct offering of our common stock and warrants to purchase our common stock completed in August 2008, with no equivalent proceeds during fiscal year 2009, (ii) a $27.2 million increase in cash deposits at banks as collateral in the year ended September 30, 2009, and (iii) decreased borrowings, net of repayments, of $12.5 million in the year ended September 30, 2005 to $41.4 million in the same period in 2006, primarily attributable to the construction of the facility to house a new cylindrical cell production line and a new automated aluminum cell line as well as an increase in our purchases of equipment.


    61
    2009.

    70


    Financing Activities

    Net cash provided by financing activities was $55.2$67.2 million in the year ended September 30, 20072008 compared to $35.0$55.2 million in the same period in 2006.2007. This was mainly attributable to (i) net proceeds of $12.8 million from a $18.1private placement of our common stock completed in November 2007, (ii) net proceeds of $15.0 million from a registered direct offering of our common stock and warrants to purchase our common stock completed in August 2008, (iii) a $1.2 million increase in net proceeds from borrowings due to additional loans obtained for workingour issuance of capital and construction of new production linesstock in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, and (ii)2008, (iv) a $8.2 million decrease in cash depositeddeposits at banks to satisfyas collateral requirements in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was $2.4 million more than that in the same period in 2006.


    Net cash provided by financing activities was $52.4 million in the year ended September 30, 2005 compared to $35 million in the same period in 2006. This was mainly attributable to (i) a $17.9 million increase in2008, and (v) decreased borrowings, net proceeds from borrowing due to more loans being secured for working capital purposes in the year ended September 30, 2006, and (ii) decrease in cash deposited at banks to satisfy collateral requirements in the year ended September 30, 2006 was $18.7 million more than that in the same period in 2005. The impact of these cash outflows was offset by receiptrepayments, of $55.4 million cash proceeds from the two capital raisings in January 2005 and September 2005.

    $9.1 million.

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, the principal amounts outstanding under our credit facilities and lines of credit were as follows:


      
    Maximum
    Amount
    Available
     
    Amount
    Borrowed
     
      
    (in thousands)
     
    Short-term credit facilities:
       
    Agricultural Bank of China $79,885 $29,742 
    Shenzhen Development Bank  19,971  19,971 
    Shenzhen Ping An Bank  26,628  12,648 
    China CITIC Bank  26,628  16,116 
    China Construction Bank  19,971  - 
    Bank of China  33,199  33,199 
    Subtotal—short-term credit facilities $206,282 $111,676 
          
    Long-term credit facilities:
         
    Agricultural Bank of China  26,628  15,977 
    China Development Bank  13,314  13,314 
          
    Subtotal—long-term credit facilities $39,942 $29,291 
            
    Lines of Credit:
         
    Agricultural Bank of China    566 
    China Merchants Bank     1,162 
    Bank of China    310 
          
    Subtotal-lines of credit    2,038 
          
    Total Principal Outstanding   $143,005 
    62

      Amount
      Borrowed
      (Include
     Maximumbank loans
     Amountand bills
     Availablepayable)
     (in thousands of U.S. dollars)
    Short-term credit facilities:      
    Agricultural Bank of China$ 58,597$ 58,597
    Shenzhen Development Bank 21,974  21,974 
    China Everbright Bank14,6494,351
    China CITIC Bank 21,974  18,420 
    Bank of Communications29,2987,325
    Bank of China 65,922  52,136 

    Subtotal—short-term credit facilities

    $

    212,414


    $

    162,803


    Long-term credit facilities:






    Agricultural Bank of China21,97421,974
    China Development Bank 10,254  10,254 
    Agricultural Bank of China, Tianjin Jinxin Branch23,43923,439

    Subtotal—long-term credit facilities

    $

    55,667


    $

    55,667


    Lines of Credit:






    Agricultural Bank of China    4,096 
    Shenzhen Development Bank 2,402
    Bank of China    7,106 
    China CITIC Bank 1,529
    Ningbo Bank    14,612 
    Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, Tianjin Pucheng Branch 551

    Subtotal-lines of credit

     



    $

    30,296



    Total Principal Outstanding


    $


    268,081




    $


    248,766


    The above principal outstanding amounts under credit facilities and lines of credit included short-term bank loans of $89.9$139.2 million, long-term bank loans of $29.3$16.1 million maturing within one year and long-term bank loans of $39.6 million maturing in over one year, and bills payable of $23.8$53.9 million.


    For the purpose of presentation purposes, the effect of the increase in bills payable balances is included in operating activities in the statements of cash flows due to their nature.


    71


    During fiscal year 2007,2009, we repaid 24 short-term bank loans totaling $111.1 million,$151.4million, and entered into 1823 new short-term bank loan agreements totaling $128.0 million and two new long-term bank loan agreements totaling $29.3$176.3 million. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007,2009, we repaid fourtwo short-term bank loans totaling $34.0 million, entered into seven short-term bank loan agreements totaling $55.3 million, and borrowed $2.7 million under a long-term bank loan credit facility. The seven new short-term bank loan agreements provide for monthly interest payments at annual interest rates from 5.85% to 7.722%, with principal repayments at maturities during the second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. These debt arrangements are generally guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li, our chairman, president, and chief executive officer. The short-term bank loan with Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China was secured by the property ownership and land use rights certificate to be obtained in relation to the land on which our corporate facilities have been constructed. The four repaid loan agreements were with Agricultural Bank of China and Bank of China, and the seven new short-term bank loan agreements are with Agricultural Bank of China, Shenzhen DevelopmentEastern Branch (“Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch”), totaling $14.6 million, and entered into three short-term loan agreements totaling $17.9 million. The three new short-term loan agreements include one loan agreement with Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch (“Bank of China”), totaling $3.3 million, and two loan agreements with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Commercial Bank.


    Branch, totaling $14.6 million. The material financing terms of these loans are described below.

    During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we borrowedone short-term loan from Bank of China separate from our credit agreement with Bank of China totaling $3.3 million, carrying annual interest of 0.74375% and is due on July 20, 2010.

    During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we also borrowed two short-term loans from Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch totaling $14.6 million, carrying annual interest at 4.617%, adjusted quarterly. The first loan, of approximately $7.3 million, currently carries annual interest at 4.617% and is due on January 21 2010. The second loan, of approximately $7.3 million, currently carries annual interest at 4.617% and is due on January 22 2010.

    On April 26, 2009, we entered into a comprehensive credit facility agreement with Bank of Communications to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 200 million (approximately $29.3 million). This credit facility agreement is guaranteed by BAK Tianjin and Mr. Xiangqian Li. Loans may be drawn at any time from March 25, 2009 to March 25, 2010. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed approximately $7.3 million under a loan agreement dated June 20, 2007,23, 2009 under this credit facility agreement, bearing fixed interest of 4.779%, and which is repayable on June 23, 2010.

    On January 21, 2009, we entered into a comprehensive credit facility agreement with Shenzhen Nanshan Branch, China Everbright Bank (“China Everbright Bank”) to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 100 million (approximately $14.6 million). Loans may be drawn at any time from March 30, 2009 to March 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed $4.4 million of notes payable under this facility.

    On December 8, 2008, we renewed our comprehensive credit facility agreement with Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 150 million (approximately $20.0$22.0 million). The loanLoans may be drawn at any time over the one-year period beginning June 20, 2007.December 8, 2008 and will be due based on each loan agreement. This credit facility agreement is guaranteed by BAK International, BAK Tianjin and Mr. Xiangqian Li, and is also secured by $22.0 million of inventory and $5.0 million of machinery and equipment. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed approximately $22.0 million under a loan agreement dated December 16, 2008 under this credit facility agreement, bearing a floating interest rate equal to the PBOC’s benchmark rate on the date of the loan agreement and adjusted quarterly, and which is repayable on December 16, 2009. We have since repaid approximately $2.9 million of the principal of this loan. We borrowed approximately $2.9 million under a second loan agreement bearing a floating interest rate equal to the PBOC’s benchmark rate on March 9, 2009 and adjusted quarterly, and which matures on March 9, 2010.

    On November 27, 2008, we renewed our comprehensive credit facility agreement with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 580 million (approximately $85.0 million), including RMB 400 million (approximately $58.6 million) one-year term credit facilities and RMB 180 million (approximately $26.4 million) five-year term credit facilities. This credit facility agreement renewed a predecessor credit facility agreement between Shenzhen BAK and Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch dated June 8, 2007 and governs all loans that were subject to the predecessor agreement at the time of the renewal. New loans may be drawn under this credit facility from November 27, 2008 through November 27, 2009, with the term of the loan established at the time each new loan is drawn, except as to funds borrowed under a loan agreement between Shenzhen BAK and Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch dated November 23, 2006 and effective December 18, 2006, or the 2006 Loan Agreement, which may be drawn at any time within five years of December 18, 2006, and which will mature five years after such funds are drawn. Pursuant to this credit facility, Shenzhen BAK must obtain prior approval from Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch to renew long-term loans subject to this credit facility. In addition, Shenzhen BAK undertook to ensure that the percentage of certain business conducted with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch relative to such business it conducts with all financial institutions combined to be at least equal to the percentage of its indebtedness to Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch relative to its indebtedness to all financial institutions combined, or the Percentages Undertaking. The “business” referred to in the preceding sentence refers to the volume of transactional payments that are drawn from Shenzhen BAK’s accounts with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch or applicable financial institutions and the amount of foreign currencies deposited with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch or applicable financial institutions. Shenzhen BAK also undertook not to issue any dividends without the written consent of Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch prior to the expiration of all loans under this credit facility (this undertaking and the Percentages Undertaking are collectively referred to as the “Undertakings”). The obligations of Shenzhen BAK under this credit facility are guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li, BAK Tianjin, and BAK International. Shenzhen BAK’s obligations under this credit facility agreement are also guaranteed by Shenzhen BAK’s pledge of the property ownership and land use rights certificates relating to its manufacturing and other facilities in Shenzhen, PRC, known as BAK Industrial Park. In the event that Shenzhen BAK breaches any of the Undertakings or any guarantying party breaches any of its guaranty obligations, Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch may, in addition to exercising any other applicable remedies under the applicable agreements, accelerate repayment of all loan amounts governed by this credit facility.

    72


    As of September 30, 2009, we had five outstanding short-term loans under this credit facility totaling approximately $58.6 million, carrying annual interest at 4.86%, 5.58% and 5.31%, adjusted quarterly. The first loan, of approximately $22.0 million, currently carries annual interest of 5.58% and is due on December 1, 2009. The second loan, of approximately $11.0 million, currently carries annual interest at 5.58% and is due on December 14, 2009. The third loan, of approximately $7.3 million, currently carries annual interest at 4.86% and is due on December 14, 2009. The forth loan, of approximately $7.3 million, currently carries annual interest at 4.86% and is due on December 17, 2009. The fifth loan, of approximately $11.0 million, currently carries annual interest at 5.31% and is due on January 5, 2010. Each of the loan agreements specifically provide for acceleration of repayment of the loan, as well as other penalties and remedies. We also had borrowed three short-term loans separate from our credit agreement totaling $4.0 million, carrying annual interest from 0.29643% to 0.41286% . The first loan, of approximately $0.32 million, carries annual interest of 0.29643% and is repayable on May 26, 2010. The second loan, of approximately $0.68 million, carries annual interest of 0.41286% and is repayable on June 21, 2010. The third loan, of approximately $3.0 million, carries annual interest of 0.34786% and is repayable on June 25, 2010. As of September 30, 2009, we also had three five-year term loans totaling approximately $22.0 million under this credit facility carrying interest at 90% of the benchmark rate of the PBOC for three-year to five-year long-term loans. The first loan, of approximately $5.9 million, currently carries annual interest of 5.184% and is due on January 25, 2012. The second loan, of approximately $11.7 million, currently carries annual interest of 5.184% and is due in three installments of approximately $2.9 million on January 25, 2010, approximately $7.3 million on January 25, 2011, and approximately $1.5 million on January 25, 2012, respectively. The third loan, originally totaling approximately $8.8 million, currently carries annual interest of 5.76% and was structured to be repaid in two installments. The first installment of approximately $4.4 million was due on January 25, 2009, and was repaid on January 20, 2009. The second installment of approximately $4.4 million is due on January 25, 2010. These five-year term loans are specifically: (i) guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li; (ii) secured by Shenzhen BAK’s machinery and equipment with carrying values of approximately $34.8 million as of September 30, 2009; and (iii) secured by the property ownership and land use rights certificates with an aggregate net book value of $104.5 million as of September 30, 2009 in relation to the land on which Shenzhen BAK’s corporate campus had been constructed and any machinery and equipment purchased and used at the campus subsequent to such construction.

    On May 26, 2008, we entered into a four-year, long-term loan agreement of RMB 160 million (approximately $23.4 million) with Agricultural Bank of China, Tianjin Branch, or Agricultural Bank – Tianjin Branch. This loan agreement is secured by the machinery and equipment purchased for the automated high-power lithium-phosphate cells production line at our Tianjin facility. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed $23.4 million under this loan agreement, payable in four installments: (i) RMB 30 million (approximately $4.4 million) on December 26, 2009; (ii) RMB 30 million (approximately $4.4 million) on December 26, 2010; (iii) RMB 50 million (approximately $7.3 million) on December 26, 2011; and (iv) RMB 50 million (approximately $7.3 million) on May 26, 2012.

    On February 13, 2009, we renewed a credit facility with China CITIC Bank. This credit facility was guaranteed by BAK International and Mr. Xiangqian Li. We were permitted to borrow up to RMB 150 million ($22.0 million) under this credit facility, which matures on February 12, 2010. As of September 30, 2009, we had borrowed $14.6 million under two loans at the fixed annual interest rate of 5.31% and $3.8 million of notes payable under this credit facility totaling approximately $18.4 million. The first loan, of approximately $7.3 million is repayable on February 25, 2010. The second loan, of approximately $7.3 million, carried annual interest of 5.31% prior to May 21, 2009. As of May 21, 2009, pursuant to a supplement agreement modifying the interest rate, this loan carries an annual interest rate of 4.779% . It is repayable on March 6, 2010. We also borrowed $1.5 million of notes payable separate from the credit facility.

    73


    On March 4, 2009, we renewed our credit facility agreement with Bank of China to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 450 million (approximately $65.9 million). This credit facility was guaranteed by BAK International and Mr. Xiangqian Li, and is also secured by $20.0 million of inventory and $18.3 million of machinery and equipment. In addition, in the event (i) we are unable to maintain a good credit record at any other bank or we are involved in any material adverse litigation with any other bank, (ii) our liabilities exceed 70% of our assets, our current ratio is less than 0.8, or our monthly sales revenue declines by 10% as compared with the same period of the prior year, Shenzhen Development Bank is entitled to accelerate the loan repayment. As of September 30, 2007, we had borrowed approximately $20.0 million under this credit facility agreement.


    On June 8, 2007, we renewed our comprehensive credit facility agreement with Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 800 million (approximately $106.5 million), including RMB 600 million (approximately $79.9 million) one-year term credit facilities and RMB 200 million (approximately $26.6 million) five-year term credit facilities. Loans may be drawn under this renewed credit facility agreement beginning June 8, 2007 through May 23, 2008, with the term of the loan established at the time such loan is drawn, except as to funds borrowed under the loan agreement dated November 23, 2006, which may be drawn at any time within five years of the effective date of the loan agreement, and which will mature in five years after such funds are drawn. The credit facility agreement is guaranteed by BAK International and Mr. Xiangqian Li and is secured by the property ownership and land use rights certificate to be obtained in relation to the land on which the Company’s corporate facilities have been constructed. As of September 30, 2007, we had outstanding under this credit facility agreement a $24.0 million one-year term loan due in the second and third quarter of fiscal 2008, bearing interest at 6.57% and 7.722% per annum, and $5.8 million bills payable. As of September 30, 2007, we also had a $16.0 million five-year term loan under this facility, which included a borrowed amount of $5.3 million with a current interest rate of 5.832% and repayable on January 25, 2012, and a borrowed amount of $10.7 million with a current interest rate of 6.237%, payable in three installments of $2.7 million on January 25, 2010, $6.7 million on January 25, 2011, and $1.3 million on January 25, 2012, respectively. The $16.0 million five-year term loan carries a floating interest rate of 90% of the People’s Bank of China benchmark rate, and is secured by pledged machinery and equipment valued at $15.8with carrying values of approximately $28.2 million as of September 30, 2007.

    On May 15, 2007, we renewed our comprehensive credit facility agreement with Shenzhen Shuibei Branch, Shenzhen Ping An Bank to provide a maximum loan amount of RMB 200 million (approximately $26.6 million), an increase of 100 million (approximately $13.3 million) as compared to the original credit facility agreement. The loan may be drawn at any time over the one-year period beginning May 15, 2007.2009. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we had borrowed $12.6$29.3 million under three loans carrying annual interest at 5.31% and 4.779%, and $22.8 million of notes payable under this credit facility agreement. This credit facility agreementThe first loan, of approximately $14.6 million, carries annual interest of 5.31% and is guaranteed by BAK International and Mr. Xiangqian Li.
    On February 14, 2007, Shenzhen BAK renewed the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount with Dapeng Branch, China Construction Bank. We may borrow up to RMB 150 million ($20.0 million) under this Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement, which will expire on February 14, 2008. As of September 30, 2007, we had no borrowings under this Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement.

    63

    On March 14, 2007, Shenzhen BAK renewed the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount with Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank. This credit facility is guaranteed by BAK International and Mr. Xiangqian Li. We may borrow up to RMB 200 million ($26.6 million) under this Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement, which will expirerepayable on March 14, 2008. As13, 2010. The second loan, of Septemberapproximately $7.3 million, carries annual interest of 5.31% and matures on March 30, 2007, we2010. The third loan, of approximately $7.3 million, carries annual interest of 4.779% and is repayable on June 2, 2010. We had also borrowed $13.3$3.3 million loanof short-term bank loans and $2.8$3.8 million billsof notes payable under this Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement.

    separate from the credit facility.

    On December 26, 2006, Shenzhen BAKwe entered into a four-year long-term loan agreement of $13.3RMB 100 million (approximately $14.6 million) with Shenzhen Branch, China Development Bank, or China Development Bank. The long-term loan is payableor was repayable in three installments as follows:


    RMB 30 million (approximately $4.0$4.4 million) on November 20, 2008;

    2008, which has been repaid; RMB 30 million (approximately $4.0$4.4 million) on November 20, 2009; and

    RMB 40 million (approximately $5.3$5.8 million) on December 26, 2010.

    The long-term loan carries an annual interest rate equal to the benchmark rate of the People’s Bank of China for three- to five-year long-term loans, which is currently 6.48% per annum.5.76% . The long-term loan is secured by Shenzhen BAK’s pledge of its new Research and Development Test Center,Centre, which is to be constructed in Shenzhen, China, after Shenzhen BAK obtainsChina. We have committed to pledge the requiredproperty ownership and land use rights forcertificates relating to this property as security after the location ofrequisite government approval is obtained, pursuant to the facility; suchloan agreement. According to the property ownership and land use rights will alsocertificate that we obtained in relation to this facility, such land may not be pledged as security.without the approval of the relevant government office. As of September 30, 2009, we had not obtained the requisite approval, and were in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for such approval. For further discussion regarding the status of property ownership rights relating to this facility, please see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Expenditures”. The obligations of Shenzhen BAK under the loan agreement are guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li. We had borrowed the full $13.3$10.2 million under this loan agreement on December 27, 2006.

    as of September 30, 2009.

    We had a negative working capital (current assets less current liabilities excluding share-based payment liabilities) of $7.0$46.3 million as of September 30, 2007,2009, as compared to working capital of $4.8$3.2 million as of September 30, 2006, a decrease2008, an increase in negative working capital of $11.8$49.5 million. This decreaseincrease was primarily attributable to a lease prepayment of $14.1 million for acquisition of land use rightslonger credit terms we obtained from our suppliers and an increase in Tianjin.short-term bank loans and long-term bank loans maturing within one year. We had short-term bank loans maturing in less than one year of $89.9$139.2 million and long-term bank loans maturing within one year of $16.1 million as of September 30, 2007,2009, or a total of $155.3 million of loans maturing within one year, as compared to $67.9a total of $114.4 million of such loans as of September 30, 2008, an increase of $40.9 million. We had long-term bank loans maturing in over one year of $39.6 million as of September 30, 2006, an increase2009, as compared to $55.7 million of $22.0such loans as of September 30, 2008, a decrease of $16.1 million.


    We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs, including our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. We may, however, require additional cash due to changing business conditions or other future developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If our existing cash and amount available under existing credit facilities is insufficient to meet our requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity securities, debt securities or borrow from lending institutions. We can make no assurances that financing will be available in the amounts we need or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The sale of additional equity securities, including convertible debt securities, would dilute the interests of our current shareholders. The incurrence of debt would divert cash for working capital and capital expenditures to service debt obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants that restrict our operations and our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. If we are unable to obtain additional equity or debt financing as required, our business operations and prospects may suffer.


    74


    Capital Expenditures

    We made capital expenditures of $30.6$65.8 million, $41.4$51.2 million, and $65.8 million$41.5million in fiscal year 2005, 2006years 2007, 2008 and 2007,2009, respectively. Our capital expenditures were used primarily to purchase plant and equipment to expand our production capacity and the lease paymentsconstruction of new factories in Tianjin, and Shenzhen.China. The table below sets forth the breakdown of our capital expenditures by use for the periods indicated.


      
    Year ended September 30,
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
      
    (In thousands)
     
    Construction costs  16,118  13,670  21,015 
    Lease prepayment  17,042  -  - 
    Purchase of equipment  32,675  27,712  9,579 
               
    Total capital expenditure  65,835  41,382  30,594 

    64

     Year ended September 30, 
      2009  2008  2007 
     (In thousands of U.S. dollars) 
    Construction costs$869 $16,807 $16,118 
    Lease prepayment$1,077 $5,455 $17,042 
    Purchase of equipment$39,561 $28,966 $32,675 

    Total capital expenditure

    $

    41,507


    $

    51,228


    $

    65,835

    We estimate that our total capital expenditures in fiscal 2008year 2010 will reach approximately $60.7$40.0 million, primarily to purchase manufacturing equipment for the expansion of our production lines and for the construction of new factories in Tianjin andour new Research and Development Test Centre in Shenzhen.


    at our Shenzhen facility.

    We have completed the construction of 188,918and put into use facilities measuring 218,178 square meters of new facilities comprised of manufacturing facilities, warehousing and packaging facilities, dormitory space, dining halls and administrative offices at the BAK Industrial Park.Park in Shenzhen. Of that space, approximately 111,00081,411 square meters are new manufacturing facilities. We have also completed the construction and put into use an additional administrative area, production facility, fourfacilities measuring 65,127 square meters comprised of manufacturing facilities, a warehousedormitory space, dining halls and packaging facility, three dormitoriesother facilities in Tianjin. Of that space, approximately 44,129 square meters are manufacturing facilities. The primary reasons for our continuing investments in the facilities in Tianjin are to realize the benefits of our prior investment in these facilities, to position the Company to capitalize on our knowledge of and two dining halls. At present, weexperience with established markets for lithium-phosphate technology, such as electric bicycles, cordless power tools, and mining lamps, and to penetrate emerging consuming markets for this technology, such as light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. The first trial shipment of its lithium-phosphate cells was used in electric bicycles, cordless power tools, uninterruptible power supplies and mining lamps. We have no significant payment obligations relatedreceived positive market feedback to these facilities.


    samples. We do not holdexpect interest in light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles to increase demand for our rechargeable lithium-based batteries substantially. We have been engaged in the landresearch and development of lithium-phosphate cells specifically for use right toin light electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles. As indicated above, our Tianjin facility is the tract of property on which we have constructed our manufacturing facilitiesnexus for all such research and other related facilities. development.

    According to the relevant PRC laws and regulations, a land use right certificate, along with government approvals for land planning, project planning, and construction must be obtained before the construction of any building is commenced. An ownership certificate will be granted by the government upon application under the condition that the aforementioned certificate and government approvals are obtained. On June 20, 2007, weWe recently obtained the approvals for project planningland use right to the tract of property on which we have constructed and on which we plan further construction from the government of our manufacturing facilities and other related facilities in Shenzhen.


    We are While we have been constructing and have completed a substantial part of the construction of our facilities with the approval of the local government of Kuichong Township of Longgang District of Shenzhen, which we understand doesit did not have the authority to grant us the land use rights certificate. However, the Company obtained approval for project planning and construction from the government of Shenzhen on June 20, 2007. Under ouran agreement with the Kuichong Township government we haveof Shenzhen for the acquisition of the land use rights to pay for a 50-yearBAK Industrial Park dated June 29, 2007, effective June 2008, the government agreed to provide us with the land use rights certificate atrelating to BAK Industrial Park on the condition that the Company would pay it an agreed unit price, which inadditional $11,819,841. According to a notice received from the aggregate amountedgovernment of Shenzhen on June 6, 2008, the Company obtained government grants of $7,889,991 to $4.0 million assubsidize this additional payment. As of September 30, 20042008, the Company had fully paid the remaining cost of $3,929,850 and $3.5 million as of September 30, 2007, following an adjustment ofhad obtained the site area after a land survey and foreign exchange adjustment. Out of the $3.5 million, $3.0 million has been paid to the Kuichong Township government. The Shenzhen municipal government has approved the grant of a land use rights certificate whichfor BAK Industrial Park.

    75


    We have insurance for our manufacturing facilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd located in BAK Industrial Park and our manufacturing facilities at our Tianjin facility. However, we are currently in the process of obtaining. In the meantime, we have recognized a net payable purchase price of $529,000 for the land use rights on the assumption that it will be on the same terms as those agreed with the Kuichong Township government.


    As of September 30, 2007, we had paid the lease prepayment amount of $717,000 for acquisition of land use rights in Shenzhen for anot able to insure our new Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, China, until we receive the required certificate of property ownership. Upon receipt of the certificate of property ownership, we intend to procure such insurance. The applications for the related certificates of property ownership rights are in process with respect to our facilities at BAK Industrial Park and Tianjin (see discussion of our Research and Development Test Centre below). As we have obtainedbeen granted the land use rights certificate.

    certificate to the premises presently occupied by the Company in BAK Industrial Park, there should be no legal barriers for us to obtain a property ownership certificate for this property. However, it is possible that the Shenzhen government may determine that even with our land use rights certificate, the buildings constructed at BAK Industrial Park were still constructed without the proper authority and must be vacated as illegitimate constructions, and we might be subject to penalties and fines. However, we believe that this possibility, while present, is remote.

    As of September 30, 2007, we had fully paid the lease prepayment amount of $14.1 million for the acquisition of land use rights inregarding our Tianjin andfacility. As of September 30, 2008, we had obtained the application for therelevant land use rights certificate wasto this facility. As of September 30, 2009, we were in process.


    the process of obtaining the relevant property ownership rights certificate to this facility. Pursuant to our land use rights certificate relating to our Tianjin facility, the Tianjin government had originally requested that we complete construction of the Tianjin facility before September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, we have obtained an extension from the Business Administration Bureau of Beichen District, Tianjin, to make the remaining contribution of the registered capital by December 11, 2009, which we have interpreted as an extension of the completion date of construction to this date.

    As of September 30, 2007, we had paid the lease prepayment amount of $717,000 for the acquisition of land use rights for a new Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, China. As of September 30, 2008, we had obtained the relevant property ownership and land use rights certificate. Pursuant to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, we are required to complete at least 25% of the construction of the new Research and Development Test Centre facility by September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we had not done so. Notwithstanding this requirement, the Shenzhen government has agreed to increase the dimensions of the Research and Development Test Centre and signed two supplemental agreements with us. According to the supplemental agreements, we are required to complete the construction by May 6, 2011. In addition, according to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, such land may not be pledged without the approval of the relevant government office. We are required to pledge our property ownership and land use rights certificate in relation to the new Research and Development Test Centre to China Development Bank pursuant to the loan agreement entered into with it. As of September 30, 2009 we were in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the requisite approval. In addition, the so-named “property ownership and land use rights certificate” relating to this facility that we were issued lacks certain terms relating to property ownership rights, which appears to indicate that the granting government has so far only granted us the relevant land use rights. As a result, this certificate may not be adequate evidence of our property ownership rights to this property. We anticipate that the government will re-grant this certificate with adequate property ownership indicia after we have satisfied the above construction requirement and followed certain procedures.

    Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments


    The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of September 30, 2007:
    2009:

     Payment Due by Period 
                  More 
         Less than 1  1-3  3-5  than 5 
      Total  year  years  years  years 
    (In thousands of U.S. dollars) 
    Short-term bank loans$139,159$139,159$-$-$-
    Bills payable$53,939$53,939$-$-$-
    Long-term bank loans$55,667$16,114$39,553$-$-
    Capital commitments$9,541 $9,541 $- $- $- 
    Future interest payment on short-term bank loans$1,866 $1,866 $- $- $- 
    Future interest payment on long-term bank loans$12,213 $9,201 $3,012 $- $- 
    Total$272,385 $229,820 $42,565 $- $- 

      
    Payment Due by Period
     
      
    Total
     
    Less than
    1 year
     
    1-3
    years
     
    3-5
    years
     
    More than
    5 years
     
      
    (In thousands)
     
    Short-term bank loans  89,871  89,871  -  -  - 
    Bills payable  23,846  23,846  -  -  - 
    Long-term bank loans  29,291  -  10,651  18,640  - 
    Land use right payable  529  529  -  -  - 
    Capital commitments  12,313  12,313  -  -  - 
    Future interest payment on short-term bank loans  3,471  3,471  -  -  - 
    Future interest payment on long-term bank loans  5,514  1,868  2,894  752  - 
    Total  164,835  131,898  13,545  19,392  - 

    65

    76


    Other than the contractual obligations and commercial commitments set forth above, we did not have any other long-term debt obligations, operating lease obligations, capital commitments, purchase obligations or other long-term liabilities as of September 30, 2007.


    2009.

    Off-Balance Sheet Transactions


    In the ordinary course of business practices in China, we enter into transactions with banks or other lenders where we guarantee the debt of other parties. These parties may be related to or unrelated to us. Conversely, our debt with lenders may also be guaranteed by other parties which may be related or unrelated to us.


    Under U.S. GAAP, these transactions may not be recorded on our balance sheet or may be recorded in amounts different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our primary off-balance sheet arrangements would result from our loan guaranties in which Shenzhen BAK, BAK International, BAK Tianjin, and/or Mr. Xiangqian Li, our director, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, would provide contractual assurance of the debt, or guarantee the timely repaymentre-payment of principal and interest of the guaranteed party.


    Neither Shenzhen BAK, BAK International, BAK Tianjin, nor Mr. Xiangqian Li received, nor is entitled to receive, any consideration for the above-referenced guarantees, and we are not independently obligated to indemnify any of those guarantors for any amounts paid by them pursuant to any guarantee.

    Typically, no fees are received for this service. Thus, in those transactions, Shenzhen BAK would have a contingent obligation related to the guarantee of payment in the event the underlying loan is in default.


    Transactions described above require accounting treatment under FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” or FIN 45.45, now included in ASC Topic 460. Under that standard, we would be required to recognize the fair value of guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, for non-contingent guarantee obligations, and also a liability for contingent guarantee obligations based on the probability that the guaranteed party will not perform under the contractual terms of the guaranty agreement.


    We have assessed the contingent liabilities arising from the above-described guarantees and have considered them immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, no liabilities in respect of the guarantees were recognized as of September 30, 2007. On2009. As of September 30, 2007,2009, we provided a guarantee for a non-related party, Nanjing Special Metal Equipment Co., Ltd., of one-year short-term bank loans with Evergrowing Bank with a maturity of August 6, 2010. We also provided a guaranteethe guarantees for anotherfour other non-related party,parties, Hunan Reshine New Material Ltd, Shenzhen Tongli Hi-tech Co. Ltd., Shenzhen B&G Technology Development Co. Ltd., and Siping Juyuan Hanyang Plate Heat Exchanger Co. Ltd. The maximum amount of our exposure for these guarantees were $6.7was $28.6 million and $16.9 million at September 30, 2007.


    2009 and September 30, 2008, respectively.

    77


    Interest Rate Risk


    We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily with respect to our short-term bank loans and long-term bank loans. Although the interest rates, which are based on the banks’ prime rates with respect to our short-term loans are fixed for the terms of the loans, the terms are typically sixthree to twelve months for short-term bank loans and interest rates are subject to change upon renewal. There were no material changes in interest rates for short-term bank loans renewed during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.


    We have2009.

    Please refer to Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing Activities” for a long term bankdiscussion of our credit facilities and loan of $13.3 million maturing on December 26, 2010 with Shenzhen Branch, China Development Bank with three installments payable under which we have outstanding borrowings; the interest rate we pay on this long term loan is benchmark rate of the People’s Bank of China for three- to five- year long-term loans. In addition, we have a RMB 200 million (approximately $26.6 million) long-term loan agreement with Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, which became effective on December 18, 2006. The long-term loan may be drawn at any time within five years from the effective date of the agreement and will mature five years after it is drawn. The term loan, when drawn, will carry a floating interest rate of 90% of The People’s Bank of China benchmark rate. As of September 30, 2007, we had borrowed $16.0 million under this loan agreement. This loan comprises a borrowed amount of $5.3 million with a current interest rate of 5.832% and repayable on January 25, 2012, and a borrowed amount of $10.7 million with a current interest rate of 6.237%, payable in three installments of $2.7 million on January 25, 2010, $6.7 million on January 25, 2011, and $1.3 million on January 25, 2012, respectively.


    agreements.

    A hypothetical 1.0% increase in the annual interest rates for all of our credit facilities under which we had outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2007,2009, would decrease net income before provision for income taxes by approximately $1.2$1.9 million or 190.5%12.5% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.2009. Management monitors the banks’ prime rates in conjunction with our cash requirements to determine the appropriate level of debt balances relative to other sources of funds. We have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk.


    66

    Foreign Exchange Risk


    Although our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, the financial records of our operating subsidiaries are maintained in their local currency, the RMB, which is our functional currency. Approximately 72.4%62.9% of our revenues and 98.2%96.9% of our costs and expenses for the year ended September 30, 20072009 are denominated in RMB, with the balance denominated in U.S. dollars. Approximately 99.6% of our assets except forexcluding cash were denominated in RMB as of September 30, 2007.2009. As a result, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk as our revenues and results of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and RMB. If the RMB depreciates against the U.S. dollar, the value of our RMB revenues, earnings and assets as expressed in our U.S. dollar financial statements will decline. Assets and liabilities of our operating subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, their equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rate and their income and expenses items are translated using the average rate for the period. Any resulting exchange differences are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. An average appreciation (depreciation) of the RMB against the U.S. dollar of 5% would increase (decrease) our comprehensive income by $5.9$8.8 million based on our outstanding revenues, costs and expenses, assets and liabilities denominated in RMB as of September 30, 2007.2009. As of September 30, 2007,2009, our accumulated other comprehensive income was $9.9$24.8 million. We have not entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign exchange risk.


    Critical Accounting Policies


    Our consolidated financial information has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities, (2) the disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the end of each fiscal period and (3) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each fiscal period. We continually evaluate these estimates based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions, our expectations regarding the future based on available information and reasonable assumptions, which together form our basis for making judgments about matters that are not readily apparent from other sources. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, our actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of our accounting policies require a higher degree of judgment than others in their application.


    When reviewing our financial statements, the following should also be considered: (1) our selection of critical accounting policies, (2) the judgment and other uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, and (3) the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions. We believe the following accounting policies involve the most significant judgment and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.


    78


    Recoverability of Long-Lived Assets


    Our business is capital intensive and has required, and will continue to require, significant investments in property, plant and equipment. As of September 30, 20062009 and September 30, 2007,2008, the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, net was $109.4 million$219.7million and $145.1$195.4 million, respectively. We assess the recoverability of property, plant and equipment to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or group of assets. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.


    A prolonged general economic downturn and, specifically, a continued downturn in the battery cell industry as well as other market factors could intensify competitive pricing pressure, create an imbalance of industry supply and demand, or otherwise diminish volumes or profits. Such events, combined with changes in interest rates, could adversely affect our estimates of future net cash flows to be generated by our long-lived assets. Consequently, it is possible that our future operating results could be materially and adversely affected by additional impairment charges related to the recoverability of our long-lived assets.


    67








    79


    Pursuant to SFAS 123R,ASC Topic 718, we have recognized compensation costs of $2,559,000$3.7 million in relation to stock-based awardawards to our employees and non-employee directors infor the fiscal year 2007ended September 30, 2009, as an increase in both the operating costs and shareholder’s equity.


    Changes in Accounting Standards


    In July 2006,June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.168 “The FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an InterpretationAccounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 109,162.The Accounting Standards Codification combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. Following this Statement, which clarifiesis now included in ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, the accounting for uncertaintyFASB will not issue new standards in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that we recognize in our consolidated financial statements the impactform of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based onStatements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) to update the technical meritsASC. Since the launch of the position. The provisionsASC on July 1, 2009, only one level of FIN 48 becomeauthoritative U.S. GAAP for non-governmental entities exists, other than guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This Statement became effective for usour annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009, but did not have a material impact on October 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle, if any, recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The management is in the process of evaluating this interpretation and therefore has not yet determined the impact that FIN 48 will have on the Company’sour financial statements upon adoption.

    statements.

    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”, or SFAS No. 157, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, where fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The standard does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The management is in the processadoption of evaluating theSFAS No. 157 has no material impact SFAS 157 will have on the Company’s consolidatedour financial statements upon adoption.

    68


    statements.

    In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,”115”, or SFAS No. 159, now included in ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with a few exceptions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The requirements of SFAS No. 159 are effective forapply to our financial statements starting in its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2008. Our management is in the processThe adoption of evaluating this guidance and thereforeSFAS No. 159 has not yet determined the impact that SFAS 159 will have on our financial statements upon adoption.

    In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, which provides guidance on the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. In SAB No. 108, the SEC staff establishes an approach that requires quantification of financial statement errors, under both the iron-curtain and the roll-over methods, based on the effects of the error on each of our financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. SAB No. 108 is generally effective for annual financial statements in the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The transition provisions of SAB No. 108 permits existing public companies to record the cumulative effect in the first year ending after November 15, 2006 by recording correcting adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company has adopted SAB No. 108 and considers it to have no material impact on the Company’sour financial statements.

    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51”, or SFAS No. 160, now included in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective for theapply to our financial statements starting in its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The managementon October 1, 2009. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is in the process of evaluating thenot expected to have a material impact SFAS 160 will have on the Company’sour financial statements upon adoption.


    statements.

    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations”., or SFAS No. 141 (Revised), now included in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141 (Revised) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidanceSFAS No. 141 (Revised) is required to be adopted by us for business acquisitions for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2009.

    In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13”, or FSP FAS No. 157-1, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. FSP FAS No. 157-1 provides a scope exception from Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) for the evaluation criteria on lease classification and capital lease measurement under SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and other related accounting pronouncements. We adopted FSP FAS No. 157-1 effective October 1, 2008. Accordingly, the provisions of SFAS No. 157 will not be applied to lease transactions under SFAS No.13 except when applying SFAS No. 157 to business combinations recorded by us.

    80


    In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, or FSP FAS No. 157-2, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. FSP FAS No. 157-2 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The management isus on October 1, 2009. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of applying FSP FAS No. 157-2 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis. Examples of items to which the deferral would apply include, but are not limited to:

    - nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are measured at fair value in a business combination or other new basis event, except those that are remeasured at fair value in subsequent periods;

    - reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test as described in SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No.142”), and nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment test, if applicable; and

    - nonfinancial liabilities for exit or disposal activities initially measured at fair value under SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”).

    As a result of the issuance of FSP FAS No. 157-2, we did not apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities within the scope of FSP FAS No. 157-2 in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.

    In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, or SFAS No. 161, now included in ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Adoption o f SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

    In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”, or FSP FAS No. 142-3, now included in ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”. FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”). FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of an intangible asset determined under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(Revised) and other U.S. GAAP. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 which means that it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. Adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, or FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, now included in ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. In addition, the FSP amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The FSP is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 have no material impact on our financial statements.

    81


    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”, or FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, for debt securities and the presentation and disclosure requirements of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 have no material impact on our financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4 “Determining Whether a Market is Not Active and a Transaction Is Not Distressed”, or FSP No. 157-4, now included in ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. FSP No. 157-4 clarifies when markets are illiquid or that market pricing may not actually reflect the “real” value of an asset. If a market is determined to be inactive and market price is reflective of a distressed price then an alternative method of pricing can be used, such as a present value technique to estimate fair value. FSP No. 157-4 identifies factors to be considered when determining whether or not a market is inactive. FSP No. 157-4 would be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 has no material impact on our financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”, or FSP No. 141R-1, now included in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”. FSP No. 141R-1 amends the provisions in SFAS No. 141 (Revised) willfor the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP No. 141R-1 eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in SFAS No. 141 (Revised) and instead carries forward most of the provisions in SFAS No. 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP No. 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 141 (Revised). We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP No. 141R-1 on our financial statements.

    In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events”, or SFAS No. 165, now included in ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events”, which sets forth general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No.165 is effective after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 has no material effect on our financial statements.

    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”, or SFAS No. 166, now included in ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”. SFAS No. 166 improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on our financial statements.

    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, or SFAS No. 167, now included in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”, which amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) to address the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. SFAS No. 167 also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, SFAS No. 167 provides more timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement with a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on our financial statements.

    In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, or ASU 2009-05. ASU 2009-05 provides additional guidance for measuring the fair value of liabilities and clarifies that the quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an active market, is a Level 1 measurement, providing there are no adjustments to the quoted price. Alternatively, when no quoted price is available, ASU 2009-05 affirms the use of other valuation techniques outlined in SFAS No. 157. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after its issuance. Adoption of ASU 2009-05 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

    In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, or ASU 2009-12. ASU 2009-12 amends SFAS No. 157 to permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the Company’sbasis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). ASU 2009-12 also requires new disclosures, by major category of investments, about the attributes includes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the Codification. ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2009-14 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements upon adoption.


    statements.

    In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) – Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements”, or ASU 2009-13. AUS 2009-13 requires companies to allocate revenue in multiple-element arrangements based on an element’s estimated selling price if vendor-specific or other third party evidence of value is not available. AUS 2009-13 is to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on our financial statements.

    In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985) – Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements”, or ASU 2009-14. ASU 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under ASU 2009-14, tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in ASC Topic 985-605, “Software – Revenue Recognition”. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software component are always excluded from the software revenue guidance. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangement entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2009-14 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

    82


    Exchange Rates


    The financial records of Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin are maintained in Renminbi.RMB. In order to prepare our financial statements, we have translated amounts in RenminbiRMB into amounts in U.S. dollars. The amounts of our assets and liabilities on our balance sheets are translated using the closing exchange rate as of the date of the balance sheet. Revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated using the average exchange rate prevailing during the period covered by such financial statements. Adjustments resulting from the translation, if any, are included in our cumulative other comprehensive income / (loss) in our stockholders’ equity section of our balance sheet. All other amounts that were originally booked in RenminbiRMB and translated into U.S. dollars were translated using the closing exchange rate on the date of recognition. Consequently, the exchange rates at which the amounts in those comparisons were computed varied from year to year.

    69


    The exchange rates used to translate amounts in RenminbiRMB into U.S. dollars in connection with the preparation of our financial statements were as follows:


      
    RMB per U.S. Dollar
     
      
    2007
     
    2006
     
    2005
     
    Balance sheet items as of September 30  7.5108  7.9087  8.0920 
    Amounts included in the statement of income and comprehensive income, statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and statement of cash flows for the years ended September 30  7.7127  8.0286  8.2413 

    Renminbi is not readily convertible into U.S. dollars in the foreign exchange markets. The foreign exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar had been stable at approximately RMB 8.28 to $1.00 for the last few years. On July 21, 2005, the Central Bank of China announced that it would allow the RMB to move to a flexible exchange rate with a maximum daily variance against the U.S. dollar of 0.3%. No provision has been made in the accompanying financial statements for the change in currency policy, nor has any determination been made, as to the potential impact, this may have on our future operations. As a result, the stated exchange rates may not accurately reflect the amount in U.S. dollars into which RMB could be actually converted at the date or during the periods reflected in the foregoing table.


    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

    The information required by this item is discussed in Item 7. “Interest Rate Risk” and “Foreign Exchange Risk.”



    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

    Consolidated Financial Statements


    The financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1 hereof.


    Quarterly Financial Results


    The following table reflects our unaudited quarterly consolidated statement of operations data for the quarters presented. We believe that the historical quarterly information has been prepared substantially on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements, and all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts below to state fairly the unaudited quarterly results of operations data.

         June  Mar        June  Mar    
      Sep 30  30  31  Dec 31  Sep 30  30  31  Dec 31 
      2009  2009  2009  2008  2008  2008  2008  2007 
      (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentage) / Unaudited 
    Net revenues$ 57,550 $ 44,689 $ 40,815 $ 68,090 $ 72,739 $ 68,486 $ 51,336 $ 52,787 
    Cost of revenues$49,457$39,641$37,793$57,497$61,258$60,082$47,421$45,681

    Gross profit

    $

    8,093


    $

    5,048


    $

    3,022


    $

    10,593


    $

    11,481


    $

    8,404


    $

    3,915


    $

    7,106

    83



      
    Sep 30
    2007
     
    June 30
    2007
     
    Mar 31
    2007
     
    Dec 31
    2006
     
    Sep 30
    2006
     
    June 30
    2006
     
    Mar 31
    2006
     
    Dec 31
    2005
     
      
    USD (in thousands, except percentage) / Unaudited
     
    Revenues  43,772  29,477  29,529  43,082  46,108  33,397  38,220  26,104 
    Cost of revenues  37,571  24,415  23,383  34,885  34,292  24,899  25,977  19,028 
                              
    Gross Profit  6,201  5,063  6,146  8,197  11,816  8,498  12,243  7,076 
    Gross Profit ratio  14.2% 17.2% 20.8% 19.0% 25.6% 25.4% 32.0% 27.1%
    Research and development costs  1,274  1,118  928  637  1,499  477  464  495 
    Sales and marketing expenses  1,424  1,165  1,064  1,042  1,512  1,041  1,297  1,205 
    General and administrative expenses  3,070  4,189  2,152  2,961  2,921  1,962  2,026  2,162 
    Operating income/ (loss)  433  (1,409) 2,002  3,557  5,884  5,018  8,456  3,214 
    Finance costs  2,089  1,069  1,164  901  895  297  515  181 
    Other (income) /expenses  (329) 90  240  (932) 166  1  34  4 
    Gain on trading securities  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  279 
                              
    Income / (Loss) before income taxes  (1,327) (2,570) 598  3,588  4,823  4,720  7,907  3,308 
    Income taxes expenses / (benefit)  (477) 120  158  5  81  43  353  116 
                              
    Net Income/(Loss)  (850) (2,690) 440  3,583  4,742  4,677  7,554  3,192 

    70


    Item

         June  Mar        June  Mar    
      Sep 30  30  31  Dec 31  Sep 30  30  31  Dec 31 
      2009  2009  2009  2008  2008  2008  2008  2007 
      (in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentage) / Unaudited 

    Gross profit ratio

    $ 14.1%  11.3%  7.4%  15.6%  15.8%  12.3%  7.6%  13.5% 

    Research and development expenses

    $ 1,630 $ 1,472 $ 1,125 $ 1,417 $ 1,688 $ 1,855 $ 1,390 $ 1,319 

    Sales and marketing expenses

    $ 1,841 $ 1,581 $ 1,154 $ 1,600 $ 1,568 $ 1,484 $ 1,403 $ 1,348 

    General and administrative expenses

    $ 5,562 $ 5,551 $ 4,116 $ 6,760 $ 5,186 $ 5,101 $ 4,823 $ 4,238 

    Operating (loss) / income

    $ (940)$ (3,556)$ (3,373)$ 816 $ 3,039 $ (36)$ (3,701)$ 201 

    Finance costs, net

    $ 2,256 $ 1,897 $ 2,364 $ 2,839 $ 3,644 $ 2,736 $ 2,418 $ 2,223 

    Other (income, including government grant income) / expenses

    $ (962)$ 131 $ (226)$ (108)$ (1,081)$ (453)$ (55)$ (943)

    (Loss) / income before income taxes

    $ (2,234)$ (5,584)$ (5,511)$ (1,915)$ 476 $ (2,319)$ (6,064)$ (1,079)

    Income tax (benefit) / expense

    $ (875)$ (413)$ 211 $ (176)$ (994)$ (31)$ 119 $ (139)

    Net (loss) / income

    $ (1,359)$ (5,171)$(5,722)$(1,739)$1,470 $(2,288)$(6,183)$ (940)

    Other comprehensive (loss) / income

                    

    - Foreign currency translation adjustment

    $ (113)$ (141)$ (261)$ 160 $ 1,241 $ 3,886 $ 6,364 $ 3,770 

    Comprehensive (loss) / income

    $ (1,472)$ (5,312)$ (5,983)$ (1,579)$ 2,711 $ 1,598 $ 181 $ 2,830 

    ITEM 9.             Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

    None.

    ITEM 9A.         CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

    84



    On January 20, 2005, we dismissed George Stewart, C.P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm and appointed Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP, as our independent registered public accounting firm. There were no disagreements or events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv)

    (a) Evaluation of Regulation S-B in connection with the change in accountants described above.


    As disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2006, as amended on August 16, 2006, we appointed KPMG on May 15, 2006 as our independent registered public accounting firm to replace Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP. This current report on Form 8-K is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

    As disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2007, as amended on April 11, 2007 and April 17, 2007, on March 28, 2007 we dismissed KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm and appointed PKF as our independent registered public accounting firm, in each case effective April 1, 2007. These current reports on Form 8-K are hereby incorporated by reference herein. As stated in our current report on Form 8-K, as amended, during the period of KPMG’s engagement as the Company’s principal accountants, beginning May 15, 2006, through March 31, 2007, there were no (1) disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused KPMG to make reference in connection with their opinion to the subject matter of the disagreement or (2) “reportable events” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, except that KPMG advised the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) of certain material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting, which were reported by the Company under Item 9A. “Controls and Procedures” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K”), to the effect that the Company had an insufficient complement of personnel, including in senior management, with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP and did not implement adequate supervisory review to ensure that the consolidated financial statement were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The lack of sufficient personnel with such accounting knowledge, experience and training contributed to the following material weaknesses in the Group’s (i) accounting for capitalization of interest costs, and the related recognition of property, plant and equipment and depreciation expense; (ii) accounting for deferred taxes under U.S. GAAP, in particular the identification and measurement of differences between the respective tax and financial reporting bases of certain assets and liabilities and the determination of the applicable income tax rate to ensure that deferred taxes were accurately presented in the Group’s consolidated financial statements; (iii) accounting for the share-based compensation, in particular the accounting for cancellation and replacement of certain option grants and the classification of the associated share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income; (iv) calculation of earnings per share in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 “Earnings per Share,” in particular the identification of dilutive instruments in the calculation of diluted earnings per share; (v) accounting for the complete and accurate recognition of construction in progress assets; and (vi) accounting for construction in progress assets and the determination of depreciation expense when the assets are ready for their intended use.

    As further previously disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2007, as amended, the audit report, dated August 22, 2006, of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of the Group as of September 30, 2005 and 2004 and for the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, which was included in Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except as follows: KPMG’s report contained a separate paragraph stating that “As described in Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2004 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, which were previously audited by other independent accountants, to correct certain accounting errors that were detected after the original issuance of those consolidated financial statements.” The audit report, dated December 8, 2006, of KPMG on the consolidated financial statements of the Group as of and for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, which was included in the 2006 Form 10-K, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except as follows: KPMG’s report contained a separate paragraph stating that “As discussed in note 2(q) to the consolidated financial statements, on October 1, 2005, the Group adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, using the modified prospective method, representing a change in the Group’s method of accounting for stock-based compensation.” The audit report of KPMG on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, which is included in the 2006 Form 10-K, did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that KPMG’s report indicates that the Group did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, because of the effect of material weaknesses, including those set forth above, described in such report and elsewhere in the 2006 Form 10-K.
    71


    As further previous disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2007, as amended, the Company provided KPMG with a copy of the disclosures in such Form 8-K, as amended, and requested that KPMG furnish a letter, pursuant to Item 304(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not it agreed with that disclosure. The Company filed this amendment to such Form 8-K, as amended by the Form 8-K/A filed April 17, 2007, to provide a copy of the letter received from KPMG, which was attached thereto as Exhibit 16 and is incorporated herein by reference.

    As further previous disclosed in our current report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2007, as amended, during the Company’s two most recent fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006, and in the subsequent interim period through March 31, 2007, the Company did not consult with PKF regarding (1) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or (2) any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.
    Item 9A.Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

    (a)
    Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

    The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported during the year and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and published financial statements.


    As of September 30, 2007,2009, our Management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, in accordance with Rules 13a-15(f)13a-15(b) and 15d-15(f)15d-15(b) of the Exchange Act. As of the date of this assessment, our management concluded that through the ongoing remediation efforts from last year, the Company was able to correct numerous internal controls deficiencies.deficiencies. However, these remediation efforts, individually and in the aggregate, were insufficient to fully eliminate those weaknesses that have materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting in fiscal year 2007.


    2009.

    As a result, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2007,2009, at the reasonable assurance level.


    (b)
    Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and includes those policies and procedures that:


    (1)pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
    (2)provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and
    (3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
    72

    (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

    (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and

    (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

    Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


    Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007.2009. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control - - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring.


    A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management identified the following material weaknesses during its assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007:


    Entity Level Material Weakness - Control Environment

    We2009:

    85


    • The Company did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting processesprocess due to an insufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with ourthe Company’s financial requirements. Additionally, ourthe Company’s senior management lacked an adequate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP, and did not implement adequate and proper supervisory review to ensure the consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and with SEC requirements.

    Process Level Material Weakness - Proceduresrequirements of the U.S. Securities and Transactions
    Exchange Commission.
    We
  • The Company did not maintain adequate procedures to properly accounteffective controls over the accounting for deferred taxes under U.S. GAAP.construction in progress assets and the determination of depreciation expenses when the assets are ready for their intended use. Specifically, wethe Company did not have effective control procedures overcontrols to track and assess the identificationready-for-intended-use status of the construction in progress assets to ensure the construction in progress assets being transferred to property, plant and measurement of differences between the respective tax and financial reporting bases of certain assets and liabilitiesequipment and the determinationrelated commencement of the applicable income tax rate to ensure that deferred taxes were accurately presenteddepreciation expense was in our consolidated financial statements. This material weakness resulted in a material adjustment to our preliminary consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2007. The need for this adjustment was initially identified by our external auditor and subsequently implemented by our management.

  • accordance with U.S. GAAP.

    As a result of the existence of these material weaknesses, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our company did not maintain effective control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007,2009, based on the criteria inInternal Control - Integrated Framework.


    Our independent registered public accounting firm, PKF Hong Kong, has issued an audit report on our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. Their audit report is included therein.


    (c)
    Remediation Measures for Material Weaknesses

    herein.

    (c) Remediation Measures for Material Weaknesses

    To remediate the material weaknesses described above in “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”, we have begun to take steps to remediate them, and plan to implement the new measures described below in our ongoing efforts to address the internal control deficiencies described above.


    We plan to further develop policies and procedures governing the hiring and training of personnel to better assure sufficient personnel with the requisite knowledge, experience and training in the application of generally accepted accounting principles commensurate with our financial reporting and U.S. GAAP requirements. We plan to utilize qualified accounting advisors and supervisors to ensure that our staff has adequate professional knowledge and to monitor the need for additional or better-qualified staff. In addition, we plan to utilize appropriate training programs on accounting principles and procedures to better ensure the adequacy of our accounting and finance personnel.

    73


    We plan to continue to develop our corporate culture toward emphasizing the importance of internal controls and to ensure that all personnel involved in maintaining proper internal controls recognize the importance of strictly adhering to accounting principles accepted in the United States of America.


    We plan to continue to provide additional training to the Company’s internal auditor on appropriate controls and procedures necessary to document and evaluate our internal control procedures. In addition, one of our employees has assumed the full-time position of Director of Internal Audit, and has been, and will continue to be, responsible for compliance with internal controls.


    We also plan to further enhance the self-assessment of our internal control over financial reporting by increasing our periodic independent testing, which would evaluate the adequacy of the design and effectiveness of our internal control procedures.


    (d) Changes

    We also plan to implement procedures to maintain effective control over the accounting for construction in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

    progress assets and the determination of depreciation expense when the assets are ready for their intended use, including the following:

    i)

    We will provide additional training to finance managers to review any applicable accounting entry and time of transfer;

    86



    ii)

    We will further train our finance department to transfer construction in progress to cost of property, plant and equipment when it is ready for its intended use, at which time depreciation charges shall commence thereon. The criteria used to determine when an asset is ready for intended use shall be based on policies that are consistent with U.S. GAAP.


    (d)

    Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

    There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 20072009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


    The Board of Directors and Shareholders of


    China BAK Battery, Inc.:

    We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Controlinternal control over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)), thatfinancial reporting of China BAK Battery, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, because of the effects of the material weaknesses identified in management’s assessment2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Commission. The Group’sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


    A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).principles. A company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


    Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

    74


    A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessmentthe accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of September 30, 2007:


    Entity Level Material Weakness - Control Environment

    2009:

    • The GroupCompany did not maintain effective controls over the financial reporting process due to an insufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with the Group’sCompany’s financial requirements. Additionally, the Group’sCompany’s senior management lacked an adequate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the application of U.S. GAAP, and did not implement adequate and proper supervisory review to ensure the consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and with SEC requirements.


    Process Level Material Weakness - Proceduresrequirements of U.S. Securities and transactions
    Exchange Commission.

  • The GroupCompany did not maintain adequate procedures to properly accounteffective controls over the accounting for deferred taxes under U.S. GAAP.construction in progress assets and the determination of depreciation expenses when the assets are ready for their intended use. Specifically, the GroupCompany did not have effective controls procedures overto track and assess the identificationready-for-intended-use status of the construction in progress assets to ensure the construction in progress assets being transferred to property, plant and measurement of differences between the respective tax and financial reporting bases of certain assets and liabilitiesequipment and the determinationrelated commencement of depreciation expense was in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

  • 87


    In our opinion, the applicable income tax rate to ensure that deferred taxes were accurately presentedCompany did not maintain, in the Group’s consolidatedall material respects, effective internal control over financial statements. This material weakness resulted in a material adjustment to the Group’s preliminary consolidated financial statementsreporting as of September 30, 2007.


    2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

    We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Group.Company. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the Group’sCompany’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2007,2009, and this report does not affect our report dated December 11, 200714, 2009 on those consolidated financial statements, which expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

    /s/ PKF

    In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Group did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Group has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

    PKF
    Certified Public Accountants

    Hong Kong China

    December 11, 2007.14

    Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

    Not applicable.

    Item, 2009

    ITEM 9B.         Other Information.


    1.
    Short-Term Loan Agreements

    During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we repaid four short-term bank loans totaling $34.0 million,OTHER INFORMATION.

    We entered into seven short-term banka standalone loan agreements totaling $55.3 million, and borrowed $2.7 million under a long-term bank loan credit facility. The seven new short-term bank loan agreements provide for monthly interest payments at annual interest rates from 5.85% to 7.722%,agreement with principal repayments at maturities during the second, third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. These debt arrangements are generally guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li, our chairman, president, and chief executive officer. The four repaid loan agreements were with Agricultural Bank of China andon July 17, 2009 to borrow approximately $3.3 million, bearing annual interest of 0.74375% . It is repayable on July 20, 2010. In the event that we fail to make timely repayment, we will incur penalty interest at the rate of 2.23% . Bank of China andmay also accelerate the seven new short-term bank loan agreements are with Agricultural Bank of China, Shenzhen Development Bank, Bank of China, and Shenzhen Commercial Bank.

    75


    Summariesrepayment of the loan agreementsif we fail to make timely repayment of interest or principal, provide untrue declarations or breach any promise, or breaks any other agreement with Agricultural Bankrespect to its obligations under the loan agreement. A copy of China arethe summary of this loan agreement is included as Exhibits 10.41 and 10.42Exhibit 10.89 to this Report and areis hereby incorporated by reference herein. The

    We entered into a loan certificates under whichagreement with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch on July 22, 2009 to borrow approximately $7.3 million, bearing annual interest of 4.617%, adjustable quarterly. It is repayable on January 21, 2010. In the other six new loans were made areevent that we fail to make timely repayment, we will incur penalty interest at the rate of 6.0021% . Bank of China may also accelerate the repayment of the loan if we breach the loan agreement. A copy of the summary of this loan agreement is included as Exhibits 10.43 through 10.48Exhibit 10.90 to this Report and areis hereby incorporated by reference herein.


    2.
    Settlement Agreement

    As described in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 6, 2007, on October 22, 2007, the Company

    We entered into a Deliveryloan agreement with Agricultural Bank – Shenzhen Branch on July 23, 2009 to borrow approximately $7.3 million, bearing annual interest of Make Good Shares, Settlement and Release Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Mr. Xiangqian Li and BAK International. As previously disclosed, Mr. Li was a party to a certain Escrow Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”)4.617%, datedadjustable quarterly. It is repayable on January 20, 2005. Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, Mr. Li placed 2,179,550 shares of common stock of the Company that he owned at such date into escrow for the benefit of certain investors who purchased shares of common stock of the Company in a private placement in January 2005 in22, 2010. In the event that we fail to make timely repayment, we will incur penalty interest at the Company failed to satisfy certain “performance thresholds,” as defined inrate of 6.0021% . Bank of China may also accelerate the Escrow Agreement. The Company’s originally reported net income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 exceeded the performance threshold established for such period; accordingly, 50%repayment of the shares placedloan if we breach the loan agreement. A copy of the summary of this loan agreement is included as Exhibit 10.91 to this Report and is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

    88


    PART III

    ITEM 10.         DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

    The information required by Item 10 of Part III is included in escrow by Mr. Li, or 1,089,775 shares, were released to Mr. Li pursuantour Proxy Statement relating to the Escrow Agreement’s terms.


    A subsequent event required recognition by the Company2010 Annual Meeting of a compensation charge in connection with the release of the escrowed shares back to Mr. Li, which would have caused the Company’s net income for fiscal year 2005 to fall below the performance threshold. As a result, based on Mr. Li’s understanding that the investors in the January 2005 share issuance would therefore become entitled to the 1,089,775 shares released to him, Mr. Li undertook on August 21, 2006 to transfer those shares to such investors on a pro rata basis. Notwithstanding this undertaking, however, the 1,089,775 shares were not delivered to such investors.

    Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Li agreed to deliver the 1,089,775 shares to BAK International; BAK International in turn agreed to deliver the shares to the Company. Upon receipt of these shares, the Company agreed to release all claimsStockholders and causes of action against Mr. Li and certain other persons regarding the shares. On October 25, 2007, the 1,089,775 shares were delivered to the Company, and such shares are now held as treasury shares. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company is obligated to commence negotiations with the investors who participated in the Company’s January 2005 private placement in order to achieve a complete settlement of BAK International’s obligations (and the Company’s obligations to the extent it has any) under the applicable agreements with such investors.

    This description of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Escrow Agreement is qualified by reference to the provisions of these agreements. The Settlement Agreement is incorporated herein by referencereference.

    ITEM 11.         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

    The information required by Item 11 of Part III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to Exhibit 10.2the 2010 Annual Meeting of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 6, 2007. The Escrow AgreementStockholders and is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 21, 2005.




    Directors and Executive Officers

    The following table provides information about our executive officers and directors and their respective ages and positions as of September 30, 2007. The directors listed below will serve until our next annual or special meeting of stockholders at which directors are elected. Effective December 8, 2006, Article V of our articles of incorporation was amended so that the number of our directors shall be determined in accordance with our bylaws instead of in accordance with the provisions contained is included in our articles of incorporation.

    Age
    Position Held
    Xiangqian Li38Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
    Tony Shen40Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
    Huanyu Mao55Director, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technical Officer
    Richard B. Goodner60Director
    Charlene Spoede Budd68Director
    Chunzhi Zhang45Director
    Yongbin Han37Vice President
    Xinggang Cao33Vice President
    Kenneth G. Broom52Vice President
    76

    Xiangqian Li has served as the chairman of our board, our president and chief executive officer since January 20, 2005. He has been a director of BAK International Limited, our Hong Kong incorporated subsidiary, since November 2004. Mr. Li is the founder and has served as the chairman of the board of Shenzhen BAK, our wholly owned subsidiary, since its inception in August 2001, and served as Shenzhen BAK’s general manager since December 2003. From June 2001 to June 2003, Mr. Li was the chairman of Huaran Technology Co., Ltd., a PRC-incorporated company engaged in the car audio business. Mr. Li received a bachelor’s degree in thermal energy and power engineering from the Lanzhou Railway Institute, China and a doctorate degree in quantitative economics from Jilin University in China.

    Tony Shen has served as our chief financial officer, company secretary and treasurer since August 3, 2007. Mr. Shen joined the Company as Vice President of Strategic Development in May 2007. Prior to joining us, Mr. Shen was Acting CFO at eLong Inc. (NASDAQ: LONG) from 2006 to 2007. Prior to eLong, Mr. Shen was at China Netcom and its affiliated companies from 2003 to 2005, where he served as CFO and Vice President of Finance for Joyzone Networks, an affiliate of China Netcom, and as General Manager of Overseas Investment Management, China Netcom International. Prior to joining China Netcom, Mr. Shen served in several senior finance roles at Solectron Corporation in the United States from 1999 to 2003. Mr. Shen received a BE in Electrical Engineering from Tsinghua University and an MBA from Columbia Business School.

    Huanyu Mao has served as a director of our company since May 12, 2006. He has also served as our chief technology officer since January 20, 2005 and as our chief operating officer since June 30, 2005. Dr. Mao has been the chief scientist of Shenzhen BAK since September 2004. Prior to joining us, between 1997 and September 2004, Dr. Mao was the chief technology officer of Tianjin Lishen, a leading battery manufacturer in China. Mr. Mao pioneered core technologies on lithium-ion battery before its commercialization in 1992 and was the inventor under seven U.S. patents relating to lithium-ion technology. Dr. Mao received a doctorate degree in electrochemistry from Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada where he focused on conductive polymers.

    Richard B. Goodner has served as our director since May 12, 2006. Since June 2003, Mr. Goodner has served as the vice president for legal affairs and general counsel for U.S. Home Systems, Inc., a public company listed on the Nasdaq National Market. Since May 2006, Mr. Goodner also has been a director of Winner Medical Group Inc., a leading Chinese exporter of medical disposal products, which shares are traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board in the United States. From 1997 and 2003, Mr. Goodner was a partner in the law firm of Jackson Walker L.L.P. Mr. Goodner holds a bachelor of arts degree in economics from Eastern New Mexico University and a law degree from Southern Methodist University, the United States.

    Charlene Spoede Budd, PhD, CPA, CMA, CFM, PMP, has served as our director since June 25, 2007. Ms. Budd is Professor Emeritus of Accounting at Baylor University, where she was a professor and Emerson O. Henke Chair of Accounting from 1993 through 2005, and where she has taught graduate management accounting, graduate project management, and other classes since 1973. She received her PhD in business administration from The University of Texas-Austin and her MBA and undergraduate degrees from Baylor University. She holds certifications as a CPA, CMA, CFM, PMP, and in all six professional categories of the theory of constraints. Currently, Ms. Budd also serves as Chair, Business Environment & Content Subcommittee, of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Chair, Finance & Metrics (F&M) Committee of the Theory of Constraints International Certification Organization (TOC-ICO).
    77



    Yongbin Han has served as our vice president of investments since October 1, 2007. Mr. Han served as our vice president of finance from August to October 2007, our chief financial officer and company secretary from January 2005 to August 2007, and our treasurer from August 2005 to August 2007. He has been the vice president of Shenzhen BAK since April 2003. Prior to joining us, Mr. Han served as deputy general manager of Huaruan Technology from January 2002 to April 2003 and as department manager of Zhonghongxin Jianyuan Accounting Firm, a PRC certified public accounting firm, from July 1995 to July 2001. Mr. Han received a bachelor’s degree in accounting from the Changchun Tax Institute, China. Mr. Han is a PRC certified public accountant and certified tax agent.

    Kenneth G. Broom has served as our vice president of international OEM Business since October 1, 2007. From January 2007 to September 2007, he worked as Vice President of Technology for BAK Canada. Prior to joining us, Mr. Broom served as executive vice president of E-One Moli Energy (Canada) Limited (“E-One”), the only high volume manufacturer of cylindrical lithium-ion rechargeable cells in North America, from 2003 to 2007. He was also General Manager of Operations of E-One from 1992 to 2003; while in this role, he managed equipment and product design. He is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of B.C. Mr. Broom received a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Waterloo.

    Xinggang Cao has served as our vice president of China Business since October 1, 2007. Mr. Cao served as the deputy general manager of our prismatic cells unit from March to September 2007, and as the director of our sales department from September 2006 to March 2007. From May 2003 to September 2006, he served as the manager of our domestic sales department. Mr. Cao received a master’s degree in business administration from Jilin University.

    Family Relationships

    There are no family relationships among our directors or officers.

    Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

    None of our directors has been subject to any legal proceedings in the past five years and that may adversely affect his or her ability and/or integrity to serve as our director.

    Promoters and Certain Control Persons
    We did not have any promoters at any time during the past five fiscal years.

    Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

    Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain executive officers and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of the common stock, and any changes in that ownership, to the SEC.  The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports. Based solely on our review of copies of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations of our directors and executive offers, we believe that all persons subject to reporting filed the required reports on time in 2006 and 2007, except as follows: (i) late Form 4 reports filed by each of Houde Liu and Shuquan Zhang on October 23, 2006 and filed by Yanlong Zou on October 20, 2006 to report the cancellation of a stock option grant on September 28, 2006 of 50,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a termination and release agreement entered into between us and each of Houde Liu, Shuquan Zhang and Yanlong Zou; (ii) late Form 3 reports filed by each of Joseph R. Mannes, Richard B. Goodner and Jay J. Shi on October 25, 2006, in each case to report appointment as our director on May 12, 2006; (iii) late Form 4 reports filed by each of Joseph R. Mannes, Richard B. Goodner and Jay J. Shi on October 25, 2006 to report the grant of 5,000 restricted shares of our common stock pursuant to our Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors, adopted by us on May 12, 2006; (iv) late Form 4 report filed by Xiangqian Li on April 2, 2007, to report the release of 1,089,775 shares of common stock from escrow to investors pursuant to an escrow agreement between Mr. Li and such investors; (v) late Form 4 reports filed by each of Houde Liu, Yanlong Zou, Shuquan Zhang and Yongbin Han on April 2, 2007 to report the grant of 34,142, 34,142, 34,142 and 136,566 shares of restricted stock, respectively, on December 26, 2006; and (vi) late Form 3 report filed by Zhongyi Deng on April 3, 2007 to report his appointment as our Vice-President of Business Development.
    78


    Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

    We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethicsProxy Statement relating to the conduct2010 Annual Meeting of our business by our employees, officers and directors. We intend to maintain the highest standards of ethical business practices and compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to our business, including those relating to doing business outside the United States.

    Material Changes to Director Nomination Procedures

    There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to our board of directors since such procedures were last disclosed.

    Audit Committee

    We have a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The committee members are Richard B. Goodner, Charlene Spoede Budd and Chunzhi Zhang.

    Audit Committee Financial Expert

    The Board of Directors has determined that we have an audit committee financial expert serving on our audit committee. Our audit committee financial expert is Charlene Spoede Budd. Ms. Budd has been “independent” as that term is defined under the Nasdaq listing standards at all times during her service on our audit committee.

    Item 11. Executive Compensation.

    Compensation Discussion and Analysis

    Compensation Philosophy

    Our executive compensation philosophy is to align the interests of executive management with shareholder interests and with our business strategy and success, through an integrated executive compensation program that considers short-term performance, the achievement of long-range strategic goals and growth in total shareholder value. The key elements of executive compensation are competitive base salary, annual incentive opportunities and equity participation. The aggregate compensation package is designed to attract and retain individuals critical to the long-term success of the Company, to motivate these persons to perform at their highest levels, and to reward exceptional performance.

    The compensation of our executive officers is determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Chief Executive Officer reviews and revises compensation proposals prepared by Human Resources and presents his recommendations to the Compensation Committee for the Committee’s ultimate review and approval. The Chief Executive Officer does not participate in Compensation Committee meetingsStockholders and is not involved in decisions relating to his own compensation.
    79


    Elements of Compensation

    Base Salary. Base salary levels for executive officers are set forth in their individual employment agreements, and are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below. incorporated herein by reference.

    ITEM 13.         CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

    The Compensation Committee considered the total compensation paid by other manufacturing companies in Shenzhen, China to persons holding equivalent positions in setting base salary levels. However, the Compensation Committee did not conduct a peer group compensation analysis or target any particular compensation level in establishing the base salaries for named executive officers.

    Mr. Broom’s fiscal year 2007 salary is considerably higher than the salary of the other named executive officers because of the Company’s desire to attract executives with appropriate experience. In setting Mr. Broom’s salary, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Broom’s twenty-three years of experience in the li-on battery industry as well as the level of compensation Mr. Broom received from his previous employer.

    The Compensation Committee believes that any increases in base salary should be based upon a favorable evaluation of individual performance relative to individual goals, the functioning of the executive’s team within the corporate structure, success in furthering the corporate strategy and goals, individual management skills and responsibilities, demonstrated loyalty, and the Company’s commitment to attract and retain executives. We expect that our Compensation Committee will reward superior individual and company performance with commensurate cash and other compensation. Because each of the employment agreements was entered into in fiscal year 2007, the Compensation Committee did not increase base salary during the fiscal year. Salary will next be reviewed when the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, but the Compensation Committee will not review salary more frequently than on an annual basis.
    Bonuses. Executives are eligible to receive a discretionary bonus pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements. However, in fiscal 2007 we did not set any performance targets and no discretionary bonuses were paid because the Company’s performance did not meet the management’s total satisfaction. If our Compensation Committee determines to do so in the future, bonuses may be paid on an ad hoc basis to recognize superior performance. If the Compensation Committee determines to provide bonus compensation as a regular part of our executive compensation package, it will establish performance goals for each of the executive officers and maximum bonuses that may be earned upon attainment of such performance goals.
    Equity Incentives. Named Executive Officers are eligible for equity awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock under our 2005 stock option plan. Equity awards are granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The size of an award to any individual, including named executive officers, depends on individual performance, salary level and competitive data, and the impact that such employee’s productivity may have on shareholder value over time. In addition, in determining the number of stock options or shares of restricted stock granted to each named executive officer, the Compensation Committee considers the future benefits potentially available to the named executive officers from existing awards. The number of options or restricted shares granted depend in part on the total number of unvested options and restricted shares deemed necessary to provide an incentive to that individual to remain with the Company for the long-term.

    In fiscal year 2007, with the goals of aligning the interest of the Company and our employees, retaining superior personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, and promoting the growth and prosperity of the Company, (1) the Compensation Committee approved the cancellation of options previously granted to employees, including Mr. Han, who are residents of the PRC, and granted restricted stock as replacement awards to the employees whose options had been terminated and who continued to be employed by the Company, and (2) granted stock options to Mr. Shen and Mr. Broom in connection with their employment with the Company. The restricted stock award to Mr. Han and the stock option grants to Mr. Shen and Mr. Broom are reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.

    We have no program, plan or practice of granting equity awards that coincide with the release by the Company of material non-public information.

    We seek to further align management and shareholder interests by giving to executives an equity interest in our company, the value of which depends upon stock performance. The Committee believes that using restricted stock as part of the overall equity awards program better aligns the interest of management and shareholders as restricted stock closely replicates the economic characteristics of capital stock.
    80


    Retirement Benefits. Currently, we do not provide any company-sponsored retirement benefits or deferred compensation programs to any employee, including the named executive officers, (other than a mandatory state pension scheme in which all of our employees in China participate) because it is not customary to provide such benefits and programs in China.

    Perquisites. Historically, we have provided our named executive officers with minimal perquisites and other personal benefits that we believe are reasonable. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of compensation, but do believe they can be useful in attracting, motivating and retaining the executive talent for which we compete.

    Compensation Committee Report

    The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysisinformation required by Item 402(b)13 of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommendedPart III is included in our Proxy Statement relating to the Board that the Compensation Discussion2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Analysis beis incorporated herein by reference.

    ITEM 14.         PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

    The information required by Item 14 of Part III is included in this annual report.


    COMPENSATION COMMITTEE 
    Richard B. Goodner
    Charlene Spoede Budd
    Chunzhi Zhang
    SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007

    The following table provides information regarding the compensation for each person serving as a principal executive officer or a principal financial officer of the Company during the year ended September 30, 2007, and the other most highly compensated officers during that period whose compensation exceeded $100,000.

    Name and Principal Position Year 
    Salary
    ($)
     
    Stock Awards
    ($) (1)
     
    Option Awards
    ($)(1)
     
    Total
    ($)
     
    Xiangqian Li,
    President, Chief Executive Officer
      2007  31,953  -  -  31,953 
    Tony Shen, Chief Financial Officer (2)  2007  8,521  -  74,095  82,616 
    Yongbin Han, Former Chief Financial Officer (3)  2007  25,563  233,503  -  259,066 
    Huanyu Mao  2007  27,655  -  257,391(4) 319,855 
    Kenneth G. Broom  2007  186,904  -  12,913  199,817 

    (1)The amounts represented in the stock and option awards columns reflect the compensation expense recognized by the Company in fiscal year 2007 determined pursuant to SFAS 123R, and no forfeitures are assumed. The assumptions used to calculate the value of option and restricted stock awards are set forth under Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Also see “Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” for more detail regarding equity grants to named executive officers in fiscal year 2007.
    81

    (2)As of August 3, 2007.
    (3)Resigned August 3, 2007, as Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Han is currently the Company’s Vice President of Investment.
    (4)This amount reflects the compensation expense recognized by the Company in fiscal year 2007 determined pursuant to SFAS 123R related to the May 16, 2005 award of stock options to Mr. Mao.
    Summary of Employment Agreements

    The base salary shown in the Summary Compensation Table is described in each named executive officer’s respective employment agreement. The material terms of those employment agreements are summarized below.

    With the exception of Mr. Broom, the named executive officers entered into the Company’s standard employment agreement. On December 20, 2006, Shenzhen BAK Battery Co. Ltd. entered into a non-standard employment agreement with Mr. Broom in connection with his employment in Canada as Executive Vice President for BAK Canada Ltd. Mr. Broom’s employment agreement entitles him to a grant of 100,000 stock options, an allowance for monthly car expenses, and the cost of legal representation and indemnification for damages in the event Mr. Broom’s prior employer files any claims or demands against himour Proxy Statement relating to his employment with the Company. In the event the Company terminates Mr. Broom’s employment without cause prior to the expiration2010 Annual Meeting of the two-year term of the agreement, heStockholders and is entitled to a lump sum payment or salary continuation equal to the amount he would have received had no termination occurred. Neither the Company nor Mr. Broom have incurred any legal costs or damages relating to Mr. Broom’s former employment.

    Material Terms of Standard Employment Agreement. With the exception of Mr. Li, who has a three-year employment agreement, we entered into two-year employment agreements with Messrs. Mao, Shen, and Han. We entered into the employment agreement with Messrs. Li, Mao, and Han on June 30, 2006, and with Mr. Shen on May 13, 2007.
    Our standard employment agreement permits us to terminate the executive’s employment for cause, at any time, without notice or remuneration, for certain acts of the executive, including but not limited to a conviction or plea of guilty to a felony, negligence or dishonesty to our detriment and failure to perform agreed duties after a reasonable opportunity to cure the failure. An executive may terminate his employment upon one-month written notice if there is a material reduction in his authority, duties and responsibilities or if there is a material reduction in his annual salary before the next annual salary review. Furthermore, we may terminate the executive’s employment at any time without causeincorporated herein by giving a one-month advance written notice to the executive officer. If we terminate the executive’s employment without cause, the executive will be entitled to a termination payment of up to three months of his or her then base salary, approximately $6,391 to $7,988, depending on the length of such executive’s employment with us. Specifically, the executive will receive salary continuation for: (i) one month following a termination effective prior to the first anniversary of the effective date of the employment agreement; (ii) two months following a termination effective prior to the second anniversary of the effective date; and (iii) three months following a termination effective prior to or any time after the third anniversary of the effective date. The employment agreements provide that the executive will not participate in any severance plan, policy, or program of the Company.
    82


    Our standard employment agreement contains customary non-competition, confidentiality, and non-disclosure covenants. Each executive officer has agreed to hold, both during and after the employment agreement expires or is earlier terminated, in strict confidence and not to use, except as required in the performance of his duties in connection with the employment, any confidential information, technical data, trade secrets and know-how of our company or the confidential information of any third party, including our affiliated entities and our subsidiaries, received by us. The executive officers have also agreed to disclose in confidence to us all inventions, designs and trade secrets which they conceive, develop or reduce to practice and to assign all right, title and interest in them to us. In addition, each executive officer has agreed to be bound by non-competition restrictions set forth in his or her employment agreement. Specifically, each executive officer has agreed not to, while employed by us and for a period of one year following the termination or expiration of the employment agreement,

    approach our clients, customers or contacts or other persons or entities, and not to interfere with the business relationship between us and such persons and/or entities;
    assume employment with or provide services as a director for any of our competitors, or engage in any business which is in direct or indirect competition with our business; or
    solicit the services of any of our employees.
    GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007

    The following table sets forth information regarding grants of awards to named executive officers during the year ended September 30, 2007:

    Name Grant Date 
    All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
    (#)
     
    All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options
    (#) (1)
     Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/share) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Options Awards Closing Price on Grant Date ($/share) 
    Tony Shen (2)  May 13, 2007  -  80,000 $3.35  162,400 $3.35 
    Kenneth G. Broom (3)  June 25, 2007  -  100,000 $3.268  222,000 $3.35 
    Yongbin Han (4)  December 26, 2006  136,566  -  -  583,094 $6.25 

    (1)Grants under the 2005 stock option plan are also described in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table below.
    (2)On June 25, 2007, in connection with joining the Company, Mr. Shen was granted an option to purchase 80,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $3.35, the closing price on the grant date. The options will fully vest over two years with 10,000 shares vested at the end of each quarter starting from May 13, 2007. The first vesting date is June 30, 2007. The expiration date of the option is May 13, 2012.
    (3)On June 25, 2007, in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Broom was granted an option to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $3.268, the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock for the five consecutive NASDAQ trading days immediately preceding the grant date. The exercise price was determined in accordance with the 2005 stock option plan, which permits fair market value to be determined at the discretion of the administering committee based on reported sales over a ten business day period ending on the grant date. Any unvested portion of the option is subject to forfeiture if Mr. Broom is no longer employed by the Company. The option vests and becomes exercisable beginning July 1, 2008, as follows: On July 1, 2008, 25% of such option shall vest and shall no longer be subject to forfeiture; on July 1, 2009, the second 25% of such option shall vest and shall no longer be subject to forfeiture; on July 1, 2010, the third 25% of such option shall vest and shall no longer be subject to forfeiture; on July 1, 2011, the final 25% of such option shall vest and shall no longer be subject to forfeiture, in each case so long as Mr. Broom remains employed by the Company. The expiration date of the option is July 1, 2012.
    83

    (4)
    Mr. Han was granted 136,566 shares of restricted stock on December 26, 2006 as a replacement for 200,000 stock options that were cancelled on September 28, 2006. Forty percent of the restricted stock award vested on July 1, 2007. An additional 30% of the restricted stock will vest on January 1, 2008, and the remaining 30% of the restricted stock will vest on July 1, 2008. Any unvested portion of the restricted shares is subject to forfeiture if Mr. Han is no longer employed by the Company. The Grant Date Fair Value column reflects the full amount of the incremental fair value of the replacement award determined in accordance with SFAS 123R. Fair value of the replacement awards approximated that of Mr. Han’s terminated stock options.
    OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2007

    The following table sets forth the equity awards outstanding at September 30, 2007 for each of the named executive officers.

    Option Awards Stock Awards 
    Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) 
    Huanyu Mao (1)  80,000  120,000 $6.25  May 16, 2011  -  - 
    Tony Shen (2)  20,000  60,000 $3.35  May 13, 2012  -  - 
    Kenneth G. Broom (2)  -  100,000 $3.268  July 1, 2012  -  - 
    Yongbin Han (2)  
    -
      -  -  May 16, 2011  81,940  512,123 
    (1)Mr. Mao was granted an option to purchase 200,000 shares of Common Stock on May 16, 2005, at a price of $6.25, the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of grant, 40% of which vested on July 1, 2007. An additional 30% of the option shall vest on January 1, 2008, and the remaining 30% of the option shall vest on July 1, 2008. Any unvested portion of the option is subject to forfeiture if Mr. Mao is no longer employed by the Company. The expiration date of the option is May 16, 2011.
    (2)Vesting terms are provided in the footnotes to the Grants of Plan Based Awards table above.
    OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED - 2007

    The following table includes information with respect to the named executive officer’s stock awards that vested during the year ended September 30, 2007. None of our named executive officers exercised options during the year ended September 30, 2007.

      Stock Awards 
    Name Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting Value Realized on Vesting ($) 
    Yongbin Han  54,626  341,415 

    84


    Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

    We do not have change in control or severance agreements with our named executive officers. However, (i) each named executive officer’s employment agreement provides a payment to the named executive officer on account of the Company’s termination of his employment without cause and (ii) the 2005 stock option plan provides that all outstanding options will automatically accelerate and become fully exercisable upon a change in control, except to the extent those options are to be assumed or replaced by the successor company. In addition, the committee administering the 2005 stock option plan has the authority to accelerate vesting of the shares of common stock subject to outstanding options held by any optionee in connection with the involuntary termination of that individual’s employment within 18 months following a change in control in which the options are assumed or replaced.

    The following table reflects amounts payable to our named executive officers (1) assuming their employment was terminated without cause on September 30, 2007 and (2) assuming a change in control on September 30, 2007 or involuntary termination within 18 months of a change in control.

    Name Termination Without Cause ($) 
    Change in Control
    (1)($)
     
    Xiangqian Li  5,326(2) - 
    Tony Shen  2,130(3) 354,400 
    Yongbin Han  4,261(2) - 
    Huanyu Mao  4,793(2) 306,000 
    Kenneth G. Broom  343,894(4) 451,200 

    (1)Amounts in this column reflect the value of unvested options that would be accelerated upon (i) a change of control if the options are not assumed by the successor corporation and (ii) involuntary termination within 18 months following a change in control in which the named executive officer’s options were assumed or replaced. Amounts are calculated based on (i) the difference between (a) the closing market price of a share of the Company’s common stock on September 30, 2007 and (b) the exercise price per share for an option grant (ii) multiplied by the number of shares subject to the option grant. There is no acceleration of restricted shares.
    (2)In accordance with their employment agreements, Messrs. Li, Han, and Mao, if terminated without cause on the last day of the fiscal year, the executive would have been entitled to two months of salary continuation.
    (3)In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Shen, if terminated without cause on the last day of the fiscal year, would have been entitled to one month of salary continuation.
    (4)The amount is equal to the amount Mr. Broom would be paid if he continued to be employed for the remainder of the term of his employment agreement.
    Compensation of Directors

    Effective May 9, 2006 our shareholders approved our compensation plan for non-employee directors. Eligible directors are paid approximately $20,000 annually, except that the director with the additional responsibility of chairing the Audit Committees is paid an additional $5,000 annually, in each case subject to adjustments determined by our board from time to time. Each independent director is granted 5,000 restricted shares of our common stock for serving as a director.

    On May 12, 2006, we issued 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each of Richard B. Goodner, Joseph R. Mannes and Jay J. Shi as compensation for their services as a director. Messrs. Mannes and Shi resigned as directors on June 25, 2007. Each of Mr. Zhang and Ms. Budd were granted 5,000 shares of restricted Common Stock on June 25, 2007, and on July 17, 2007, Mr. Goodner was granted an additional 5,000 shares of restricted Common Stock. These restricted shares are subject to a one-year vesting schedule, with the first 25% vesting on the grant date, and the remaining 75% vesting in three installments on the last day of each following full quarter. The first 25% of the restricted shares will be issued as fully paid ordinary shares.
    85


    DIRECTOR COMPENSATION - Fiscal Year 2007
     
            
    Name 
    Fees Earned or
    Paid in Cash
    ($)
     
    Stock
    Awards
    ($)(1)
     
    Total
    ($)
     
    Charlene Spoede Budd  25,000  16,750(2) 41,750 
    Chunzhi Zhang  20,000  16,750(2) 36,750 
    Richard B. Goodner  20,000  79,150(3)(4) 99,150 
    Joseph R. Mannes  25,000  57,500(3) 82,500 
    Jay J. Shi  20,000  57,500(3) 77,500 

    (1)The amounts represented in the stock awards column reflect the compensation expense recognized by the Company in fiscal year 2007 determined pursuant to SFAS 123R, and no forfeitures are assumed. The assumptions used to calculate the value of the restricted stock awards are set forth under Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
    (2) Granted 5,000 shares of our restricted Common Stock on June 25, 2007.
    (3) Granted 5,000 shares of our restricted Common Stock on May 12, 2006.
    (4) Granted 5,000 shares of our restricted Common Stock on July 17, 2007.

    Both Mr. Mannes and Ms. Budd received a $25,000 retainer fee because of the added responsibility of serving as the chairperson of our Audit Committee during fiscal year 2007.

    We do not maintain a medical, dental or retirement benefits plan for the directors.

    We have not compensated, and will not compensate, our non-independent directors, such as Mr. Xiangqian Li and Dr. Huanyu Mao, for serving as our directors, although they are entitled to reimbursements for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending our board meetings.

    The directors may determine remuneration to be paid to the directors with interested members of the board refraining from voting. The Compensation Committee will assist the directors in reviewing and approving the compensation structure for the directors.

    Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

    All current members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, and all past members were independent directors at all times during their service on such Committee. None of the past or present members of our Compensation Committee are present or past employees or officers of ours or any of our subsidiaries. No member of the Compensation Committee has had any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. None of our executive officers has served on the Board or Compensation Committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Board or Compensation Committee.
    86


    Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

    Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

    The following table sets forth certain information about the securities authorized for issuance under our 2005 stock option plan as of September 30, 2007. The options shown in column (a) below were granted under our 2005 stock option plan before the effectiveness of any stockholder approval.

    Equity Compensation Plan Information

      
    Number of securities
    to be issued upon exercise
    of outstanding options,
    restricted stock, warrants and rights
    (a)
     
    Weighted-average exercise price
    of outstanding options, restricted stock
    warrants rights
    (b)
     
    Number of securities
    remaining available
    for future issuance
    under equity compensation
    plans (excluding securities
    reflected in column (a))
    (c)
     
               
    Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  2,363,560
    (1)
    $4.45  1,282,733
    (1)
    Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -  -  - 
                     
    Total
      2,363,560
    (1)
    $4.45  1,282,733
    (1)


    (1)We granted options to purchase a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock in May 2005. Of these options, options in respect of 170,000 shares of common stock were cancelled as of October 1, 2005. In the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled. In each case, the holders of the options terminated their employment with us. On September 22, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the form of Termination and Release Agreement for cancellation of 1,400,000 shares of stock options granted to the optionees who are residents of the PRC.  The Compensation Committee also consented to adopt the terms and provisions for Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for the issuance of restricted shares and agreed to meet during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 to determine an appropriate number of shares of restricted stock that will be granted to these optionees under the Plan (“the Replacement Awards”).  Fair value of the Replacement Awards to be granted to each optionee will approximate that of the stock options given up by each optionee. The Replacement Awards are classified as liability-classified awards until such time that the number of shares is determined. On September 28, 2006, options to purchase a total of 1,400,000 shares of our common stock were cancelled pursuant to termination and release agreements signed on that day. On December 26, 2006, pursuant to the restricted stock grant agreements signed between the Company and the respective optionees and based on the closing market price of the Company’s listed common stock on that day, a total of 914,994 shares of restricted stock were granted as Replacement Awards to the employees who gave up their stock options and continued to be employed by the Company on that date pursuant to restricted stock grant agreements. The fair value of the Replacement Awards granted to each optionee approximated that of such employee’s terminated stock options. The Compensation Committee ratified such grants on January 15, 2007. On June 25, 2007, the Company also issued 1,501,500 options to 111 employees pursuant to the 2005 stock option plan. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable during the period from June 30, 2007 to February 9, 2012 according to each employee’s respective agreement. The material terms of our 2005 stock option plan are summarized below.

    Option Grants In the Last Fiscal Year

    We granted options to our executive officers under our 2005 stock option plan in the fiscal years of 2005 and 2007. We did not grant any options to our executive officers in fiscal years 2006.

    2005 Stock Option Plan

    On May 16, 2005, our board of directors adopted China BAK Battery, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan, which was later approved by our stockholders and became effective May 12, 2006. Under the 2005 stock option plan, our board of directors is authorized to grant to our employees, non-employee directors and advisors nonqualified stock options, enabling them to purchase up to 4,000,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of options granted pursuant to the 2005 stock option plan must be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. Fair market value is determined at the discretion of the committee (described below) on the basis of reported sales prices for the Company’s common stock over a ten business day period ending on the grant date.
    87


    Types of Awards.  We may grant the following types of awards under our 2005 stock option plan:

    non-qualified stock options
    restricted stock

    Plan Administration.  A committee designated by our board of directors administers our 2005 stock option plan. The committee has the sole discretion and authority to determine the eligibility, the number of underlying shares, as well as other terms and conditions of each grant. The committee also has the right to interpret, amend or modify each option agreement or restricted stock grant agreement and to remove any restrictions or conditions applicable to any options or restricted stock. A majority of the members constituting the committee will be sufficient to make decisions regarding matters related to the 2005 stock option plan.

    Dividends and other distribution paid on or in respect of any shares of restricted stock may be paid directly to the participant or may be invested in additional shares of restricted stock as determined by the committee in its sole discretion.

    Acceleration of Options upon Corporate Transactions.  The outstanding options will accelerate upon occurrence of a change-of-control corporate transaction or sale of all or substantially all of assets in liquidation or dissolution of our company. In such event, each outstanding option will become fully vested and immediately exercisable, subject to the final determination of the committee. However, the outstanding options will not accelerate if the successor entity assumes our outstanding options or replace them with a cash incentive program that preserves the spread existing at the time of such corporate action and provides for the subsequent payout in accordance with the same vesting schedule applicable to our options.

    Automatic Acceleration.  At the time of grant or while the options are outstanding, the committee has discretion to allow automatic acceleration of one or more options upon occurrence of a change-of-control corporate transaction, whether or not our options are assumed or replaced by the successor entity. In addition, the committee may allow automatic acceleration for options if the holder’s service is terminated involuntarily within 18 months after the effectiveness of such corporate transaction.

    Option Agreement.  Options granted under our 2005 option plan are evidenced by a non-qualified stock option agreement that sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations for the options granted, including the exercise price, duration of the options and the vesting schedule.

    Termination of Employment, Death and Disability.  In the event of termination of services other than for death, disability or misconduct, the unvested portion of the options shall immediately terminate and cease to remain outstanding. If an option holder dies or ceases to provide services to us do to permanent disability, his or her options will become fully exercisable and will remain valid for exercise for a year. If an option holder ceases to provide services to us due to his or her misconduct, all the options held by such person shall immediately terminate, whether vested or unvested.

    Market Stand-Off.  In case of a public offering pursuant to a registration statement filed under the Securities Act, holders of our options may not sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise transfer for value or dispose of any shares acquired upon exercise of an option granted under our 2005 stock option plan without the prior written consent of us and the underwriters.  In event of a public offering, the market stand-off of the shares acquired upon exercise of an option shall be in effect for such period of time from and after the effective date of the final prospectus for the offering as may be required to execute such agreement as we or underwriter request in connection with the market stand-off.

    Transferability of Options.  The options granted under our 2005 stock option plan may not be transferred other than by will or operation of laws, except as otherwise agreed by the committee.
    88


    Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

    The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2007, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each director and executive officer, (ii) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the person or entity listed in the table is the beneficial owner of, and has sole voting and investment power with respect to, the shares indicated.

      
    Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (1)
     
    Name of Beneficial Owner
     
    Number of Shares (2)
     
    Percent of Voting Stock (3)
     
    Xiangqian Li  19,053,887
    (4)
     38.7%
    BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street
    Kuichong Town
    Longgang District, Shenzhen
    People’s Republic of China
         
            
    Huanyu Mao  329,805  * 
    BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street
    Kuichong Town
    Longgang District, Shenzhen
    People’s Republic of China
         
            
    Tony Shen  30,000  * 
    BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street
    Kuichong Town
    Longgang District, Shenzhen
    People’s Republic of China
         
            
    Charlene Spoede Budd  5,500  * 
    99 Air Strip Road
    Jackson, Georgia 30233
    United States
         
            
    Chunzhi Zhang  5,000  * 
    Room 1505, Block B Tairan 9th Road
    Chengongmiao, Futian District
    Shenzhen F4 518000
         
            
    Richard Goodner  10,000  * 
    6608 Emerald Drive
    Colleyville, TX 76034
    United States
         
            
    Yongbin Han  136,566  * 
    BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street
    Kuichong Town
    Longgang District, Shenzhen
    People’s Republic of China
         
            
    Xinggang Cao  12,291  * 
    BAK Industrial Park, No. 1 BAK Street
    Kuichong Town
    Longgang District, Shenzhen
    People’s Republic of China
         
            
    Kenneth G. Broom  -  - 
    31061 Gunn Ave. Mission
    B.C. AI V45157
           
            
    Directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)  19,568,039  39.7%

    *Denotes less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock
    (1)On September 30, 2007, there were 49,250,853 shares of common stock outstanding and no issued and outstanding preferred stock. Each person named above has the sole investment and voting power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the person, except as otherwise indicated below.
    89

    (2)Under applicable SEC rules, a person is deemed to be the “beneficial owner” of a security with regard to which the person directly or indirectly, has or shares (a) the voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or (b) the investment power, which includes the power to dispose, or direct the disposition, of the security, in each case irrespective of the person’s economic interest in the security. Under these SEC rules, a person is deemed to beneficially own securities which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option or warrant or through the conversion of another security.
    (3)In determining the percent of voting stock owned by a person on September 30, 2007, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the person, including shares the beneficial ownership of which may be acquired within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities, and (b) the denominator is the total of (i) the shares in the aggregate of common stock outstanding on September 30, 2007, and (ii) any shares of common stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days upon the exercise of options or warrants or conversion of convertible securities. Neither the numerator nor the denominator includes shares which may be issued upon the exercise of any other options or warrants or the conversion of any other convertible securities.
    (4)Mr. Li is a party to an Escrow Agreement pursuant to which he agreed to place 2,179,550 shares of his common stock into escrow for the benefit of the new investors relating to the share issuance in January 2005 in the event we fail to satisfy certain “performance thresholds”, as defined in the Escrow Agreement for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2005 and 2006. Our previously reported net income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 exceeded the “performance threshold” for such period; accordingly, 1,089,775 of the shares placed in escrow by Mr. Li were released to Mr. Li. Because the recognition of a compensation charge in connection with the release of the escrowed shares back to Mr. Li would cause our net income for fiscal 2005 to fall below $12.0 million, and based on Mr. Li’s understanding that the investors in the January 2005 share issuance would therefore become entitled to the 1,089,775 shares released to him, Mr. Li undertook on August 21, 2006 to transfer those shares to such investors on a pro rata basis. Notwithstanding this undertaking, however, the 1,089,775 shares were not delivered to such investors. Pursuant to a Delivery of Make Good Shares, Settlement and Release Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) entered into among the Company, Mr. Li and BAK International dated October 22, 2007, Mr. Li agreed to deliver the 1,089,775 shares to BAK International; BAK International in turn agreed to deliver the shares to the Company. Upon receipt of these shares, the Company agreed to release all claims and causes of action against Mr. Li and certain other persons regarding the shares. On October 25, 2007, the 1,089,775 shares were delivered to the Company, and such shares are now held as treasury shares. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company is obligated to commence negotiations with the investors who participated in the Company’s January 2005 private placement in order to achieve a complete settlement of BAK International’s obligations (and the Company’s obligations to the extent it has any) under the applicable agreements with such investors. The shares listed under Mr. Li in this table do not include the 1,089,775 shares described herein. Mr. Li is also a party to a guarantee agreement under which he has pledged certain of his shares of our common stock to China Development Bank as collateral for a long-term loan agreement entered into by Shenzhen BAK. Such shares had previously been subject to a pledge in favor of Shenzhen Development Bank which was released by Shenzhen Development Bank on August 25, 2006.

    Changes in Control

    There are no arrangements known to us, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

    Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.

    Related Party Transactions

    None.
    90


    Director Independence

    The Board of Directors has determined that each of our non-employee directors is independent and that each director who serves on each of its committees is independent, as the term is defined under the Nasdaq listing standards and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

    Independent Auditors’ Fees

    Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP and KPMG performed services for us in fiscal years 2006 and 2007, and PKF performed services for us in fiscal year 2007, related to financial statement audit work, quarterly reviews, audit of internal control over financial reporting and registration statement. Fees paid or payable to George Stewart, C.P.A., Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP, KPMG, and PKF in fiscal 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

    Year Ended September 30,
     
    2007
     
    2006
     
    Audit Fees $223,630 $935,826 
    Audit-Related Fees  24,375  9,342 
    Tax Fees  -  - 
    All Other Fees  -  - 
    Total $248,005 $945,168 

    Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

    Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all audit and non-audit services performed by our auditors must be approved in advance by our audit committee to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us. In accordance with its policies and procedures, our audit committee pre-approved the audit service performed by KPMG and PKF for our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended September 30, 2007 and our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007. As our audit committee was formed only in May 2006, there was no such pre-approval by our audit committee before George Stewart, C.P.A. and Schwartz Levitsky Feldman LLP performed their audit in fiscal 2005 and before KPMG performed the re-audit of our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005.

    reference.

    PART IV



    (a)Financial Statements and Schedules

    Statements and Schedules

    The financial statements are set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included.


    (b) Exhibit Listing

    (b)Exhibit Listing
    Exhibit
    Number
    Description of Document
    No.  Description

    3.1


    Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 8, 2006)

    3.2


    By-laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 19, 2007)

    4.1


    Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 6, 2007).

    4.2

    10.1
    China BAK Battery, Inc. Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)

    89



    Exhibit No.  Description
    10.2
    4.3


    Amendment No. 1 to the China BAK Battery, Inc. Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 8, 2008)

    4.4


    Form of Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 26, 2008)

    4.5


    Specimen Common Stock Certificate representing shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S- 8 filed with the Commission on September 24, 2008)

    10.1


    China BAK Battery, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)
    91

    10.3
    10.2


    Form of Indemnification Agreement with the Registrant’s directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)

    10.3

    10.4
    Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Xiangqian Li , dated June 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 19, 2007)

    10.4

    10.5Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Yongbin Han, dated June 30, 2006
    10.6
    Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Huanyu Mao, dated June 30, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 19, 2007)

    10.5

    10.7
    Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Kenneth G. Broom, dated December 20, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 19, 2007)

    10.6

    10.8
    Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Tony Shen, dated May 13, 2007
    10.9Warrant issued by China BAK Battery, Inc. to Roth Capital Partners, LLC on September 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5010.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB10-K filed with the Commission on December 30, 2005)19, 2007)

    10.7

    10.10Warrant issued by China BAK Battery, Inc. to Global Hunter Securities LLC on September 16, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on December 30, 2005)
    10.11Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement entered into
    Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and ShuibeiShenzhen Pingshan Branch, Shenzhen CommercialDevelopment Bank, on August 7,dated December 14, 2007 (incorporated by referent to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)
    10.12Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated as of April 21, 2006, by and between BAK International Limited and Shuibei Branch, Shenzhen Commercial Bank (incorporated by referent to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)
    10.13Individual Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated as of April 21, 2006, by and between Xiangqian Li and Shuibei Branch, Shenzhen Commercial Bank (incorporated by referent to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)
    10.14Mortgage Contract, dated November 23, 2006, by and between Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China and Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (incorporated by referentreference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2007)6, 2008)

    10.8

    10.15Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount, dated June 8, 2007, by and
    Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen EasternPingshan Branch, AgriculturalShenzhen Development Bank, dated December 20, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 6, 2008)

    10.9


    Form of ChinaSettlement Agreement between the Registrant and certain investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 31, 2008)

    10.10


    Form of Settlement Agreement between the Registrant and Chinamerica Fund, LP, dated March 13, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)May 12, 2008)

    10.11


    Form of Settlement Agreement between the Registrant and The Pinnacle Fund, L.P., dated March 21, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)
    10.16
    10.12


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Shenzhen Hi-tech Industrial Park Branch, Industrial Bank Co., Ltd, dated March 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)

    10.13


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated June 8, 2007, among BAK International Limited,by and between Mr. Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen EasternHi-tech Industrial Park Branch, Industrial Bank Co., Ltd on March 24, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)

    90



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.14


    Summary of Loan Agreement, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Hi- tech Industrial Park Branch, Industrial Bank Co., Ltd, dated March 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)

    10.15


    Loan certificate with Shenzhen Hi-tech Industrial Park Branch, Industrial Bank Co., Ltd, dated March 25, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)

    10.16


    Loan certificate with Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated March 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 12, 2008)

    10.17


    Summary of Loan Agreement between BAK International (Tianjin) Limited and Tianjin Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated May 26, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.18

    10.17
    Summary of Loan Agreement dated as of June 22, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen EasternEast Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated May 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.19

    10.18
    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facilities Agreement, dated June 20, 2007, by andGuaranty Contract of Maximum Amount between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,International (Tianjin) Ltd. and LonggangShenzhen Eastern Branch, Shenzhen DevelopmentAgricultural Bank of China, dated May 20, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.20

    10.19Guaranty Contract
    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount Pledge,between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated June 20, 2007, by and between Xiangqian Li and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development BankMay 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.21

    10.20
    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount dated June 21, 2007, by and between BAK International Limited and LonggangShenzhen Branch, Shenzhen DevelopmentChina CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated May 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.22

    10.21
    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount dated June 20, 2007, by and between Xiangqian Li and LonggangShenzhen Branch, Shenzhen DevelopmentChina CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated May 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.23

    10.22Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility
    Supplemental Agreement dated May 15, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and ShuibeiShenzhen Branch, Shenzhen Ping AnAgricultural Bank (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank)of China, dated August 6, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)
    92

    10.23Individual Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated May 15, 2007, by and between Xiangqian Li and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Ping An Bank (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)8, 2008)

    10.24

    Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated May 15, 2007, by and between BAK International Limited and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Ping An Bank (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)
    10.25Loan Certificate, dated June 20, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Shuibei Branch, Shenzhen Ping An Bank (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)
    10.26Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount entered into between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. And Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank on March 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.27Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated March 14, 2007, by and between BAK International Limited and China CITIC Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.28Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated March 14, 2007, by and between Xiangqian Li and China CITIC Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.29Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and China CITIC Bank on April 16, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)
    10.30Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and China CITIC Bank on April 18, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-filed with the Commission on August 7, 2007)
    10.31Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement entered into between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Shenzhen Branch, China Construction Bank on February 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.32Summary of Guaranty Agreement of Maximum Amount entered into between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Shenzhen Branch, China Construction Bank on February 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.33
    Summary of Loan Agreement entered into between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltdby and Shenzhen Branch, China Construction Bank on February 14, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2007)
    10.34Summary of Loan Agreement, effective December 18, 2006, between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated September 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.25


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated September 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.71 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.26


    Credit Loan Certificate between Bank of China and Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., dated August 19, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.72 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10- K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    91



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.27


    Credit Loan Certificate between Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch and Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., dated August 29, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.73 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.28


    Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount among BAK International (Tianjin) Limited, BAK International Limited, Xiangqian Li, and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated September 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.74 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.29


    Summary of Shenzhen Land Use Right Grant Agreement by and between Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Land Resources and Housing Management and Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.75 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.30


    Summary of Contract for Assignment of Shenzhen Land Use Right by and between Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Land Resources and Housing Management and Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., dated June 29, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.70 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    10.31


    Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006)August 26, 2008)

    10.32

    10.35Summary of Loan
    Placement Agency Agreement dated December 26, 2006, between Shenzhen BAK Batterythe Registrant and Brean Murray, Carret & Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China Development Bank. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 3, 2007)
    10.36Summary of Guaranty Agreement, dated December 26, 2006, between Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen Branch, China Development Bank.LLC, accepted August 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 3, 2007)August 26, 2008)

    10.33

    10.37Summary of Loan
    Amendment to Placement Agency Agreement dated as of January 11, 2006, bybetween the Registrant and between Shenzhen Tongli Hi-techBrean Murray, Carret & Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Nanshan Branch of Guangdong Development BankLLC, dated August 22, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 18, 2006)August 26, 2008)

    10.34

    10.38Summary of Guaranty Contract, dated as of January 11, 2006, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Nanshan Branch of Guangdong Development Bank to secure indebtedness of Shenzhen Tongli Hi-tech Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 18, 2006)
    93

    10.39Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount, dated as of September 16, 2005, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Longhua Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank to secure indebtedness of Shenzhen Tongli Hi-tech Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A filed with the Commission on November 29, 2005)
    10.40Facility Letter, dated July 5, 2006, by and between BAK International Limited and CITIC Ka Wah Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.47 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 8, 2006)
    10.41Summary of Loan Agreement dated July 2, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Co., Ltd. and Agricultural Bank of China, Shenzhen Eastern Branch
    10.42Summary of Loan Agreement dated August 27, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Co., Ltd. and Agricultural Bank of China, Shenzhen Eastern Branch
    10.43Loan Certificate, dated July 2, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Development Bank, Shenzhen Branch
    10.44Loan Certificate, dated August 14, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Co., Ltd. and Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch
    10.45Loan Certificate, dated August 15, 2006, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch
    10.46Loan Certificate, dated September 3, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Ping An Bank, Shuibei Branch (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank)
    10.47Loan Certificate, dated September 6, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Ping An Bank, Shuibei Branch (f/k/a Shenzhen Commercial Bank)
    10.48Loan Certificate, dated July 9, 2007, by and between Shenzhen BAK Co., Ltd. and Agricultural Bank of China, Shenzhen Eastern Branch
    10.49
    Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 5, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 6, 2007)

    10.35

    10.50
    Delivery of Make Good Shares, Settlement and Release Agreement, by and among China BAK Battery, Inc., Xiangqian Li, and BAK International, Ltd., dated October 22, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 6, 2007)

    10.36

    10.51
    Escrow Agreement by and among Medina Coffee, Inc., certain investors indicated therein, Xiangqian Li, and Securities Transfer Corporation, dated as of January 20, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 21, 2005)

    10.37

    10.52Form of Termination and Release Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 2, 2006)
    10.53Form of Restricted Stock Grant Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 2, 2006)
    10.54
    Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2007)

    10.38


    Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications, dated April 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.39


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications, dated June 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.40


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications, dated April 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    92



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.41


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between BAK International (Tianjin) Limited and Shenzhen Caitian Branch, Bank of Communications, dated April 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.42


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated June 2, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.43


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated May 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.44


    Summary of Chattel Mortgage Contract by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated May 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.45


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.46


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 18, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.47


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.48


    Summary of Chattel Mortgage Contract Mortgage Contract by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 22, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.49


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.50


    Summary of Chattel Mortgage Contract by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 26, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.51


    Supplemental Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co. Ltd., dated May 21, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2009)

    10.52


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated November 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 12, 2008)

    93



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.53


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated January 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.54


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Nanshan Branch, China Everbright Bank, dated January 21, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.55


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank, dated February 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.56


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank, dated February 25, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.57


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank, dated March 6, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.58


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank, dated February 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.59


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between BAK International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank, dated February 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.60


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated March 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.61


    Summary of Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch, dated March 13, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.62


    Summary of Loan Certificate between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Bank of China, Shenzhen Branch, dated March 31, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.63


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between BAK International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated March 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.64


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated March 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.65


    Summary of Mortgage Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China, dated March 4, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.66


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    94



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.67


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank, dated March 9, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 11, 2009)

    10.68


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 8, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.69


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 16, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.70


    Summary of Mortgage Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)
       
    14.110.71Summary of Mortgage Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.72


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount Pledge by and between BAK International Limited and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.73


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Xiangqian Li and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.74


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and between BAK International (Tianjin) Ltd. and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank Co., Ltd., dated December 3, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.75


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated December 2, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)
     
    10.76Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated December 15, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.77


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated December 18, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    95



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.78


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated November 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2008)

    10.79


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount by and among Xiangqian Li, BAK International (Tianjin) Limited, BAK International Limited, and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated November 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2008)

    10.80


    Summary of Mortgage Contract of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated November 27, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 12, 2008)

    10.81


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, dated June 8, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2007)

    10.82


    Summary of Loan Agreement between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, effective December 18, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 22, 2006)

    10.83


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated October 15, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.84


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated October 17, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.85


    Summary of Loan Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated October 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on February 9, 2009)

    10.86


    Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated May 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 8, 2008)

    10.87


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount between BAK International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated May 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 8, 2008)

    10.88


    Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount between Xiangqian Li and Shenzhen Branch, China CITIC Bank Co., Ltd., dated May 9, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 8, 2008)

    10.89


    Summary of Loan Agreement between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Bank of China, dated July 17, 2009

    10.90


    Summary of Loan Agreement between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, effective July 22, 2009

    96



    Exhibit No.Description

    10.91


    Summary of Loan Agreement between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, effective July 23, 2009

    14.1


    Code of Business Conduct and Ethics of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 22, 2006)
    16.1Letter from KPMG to Securities and Exchange Commission, dated April 13, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Commission on April 17, 2007)
    21.1

    Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form S-110-K filed with the Commission on October 11, 2006)December 12, 2008)

    23.1

    23.1
    Consent of PKF

    24.1


    Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
    23.2 
    31.1

    Consent of KPMG 
    31.1
    Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    31.2

    31.2
    Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    94


    32.1


    Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    32.2

    32.2
    Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


    95

    97


    CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC.


    INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS

    ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 AND 2007
    2009

    Contents
     
    Page(s)
    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - PKF F-1
    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - KPMGF-2
    Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 F-2 - F-3
    Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations and Comprehensive Income / (Loss) for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009F-5
    F-4
    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 F-6
    F-5
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 F-6 - F-7
    Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements F-9F-8 - F-46
    96

    98



    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


    The Board of Directors and Shareholders of


    China BAK Battery, Inc.:

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20072009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended September 30, 2007.2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.


    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

    We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated December 11, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and an adverse opinion on the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

    /s/ PKF
    Certified Public Accountants
    Hong Kong
    December 11, 2007

    F-1

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
    China BAK Battery, Inc.:

    We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Group”) as of September 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

    We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


    In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the GroupCompany and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006,2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2006,2009 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


    As discussed

    We have also audited, in note 2(q) toaccordance with the consolidatedstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial statements,reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on October 1, 2005,criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Group adopted StatementCommittee of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, usingSponsoring Organizations of the modified prospective method, representing a change inTreadway Commission and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an adverse opinion on the Group’s methodeffectiveness of accounting for stock-based compensation.


    the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

    /s/ KPMG

    PKF
    Certified Public Accountants
    Hong Kong China

    December 8, 2006

    F-2
    14, 2009

    F-1


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated balance sheets

    As of September 30, 20062008 and 2007
    2009

    (In US$)


      
    Note
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Assets
           
    Current assets
              
    Cash and cash equivalents    $21,099,555 $14,196,513 
    Pledged deposits  3  12,971,989  4,594,727 
    Trade accounts receivable, net  4  64,332,171  63,150,872 
    Inventories  5  47,388,936  59,827,232 
    Prepayments and other receivables  6  1,134,770  1,656,494 
    Deferred tax assets  7(b) -  502,916 
               
    Total current assets     146,927,421  143,928,754 
               
    Property, plant and equipment, net  8, 20  109,406,116  145,123,022 
    Lease prepayments, net  9  3,161,477  17,884,436 
    Intangible assets, net  10  74,682  121,038 
    Deferred tax assets  7(b) 85,598  171,774 
               
        $259,655,294 $307,229,024 

      Note  2008  2009 
              
    Assets         
    Current assets         
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 35,706,834 $ 30,678,352 
    Pledged deposits 3  4,449,244  31,115,109 
    Trade accounts receivable, net 4  82,740,288  83,291,698 
    Inventories 5  67,583,060  65,535,384 
    Prepayments and other receivables 6  4,462,492  4,632,424 
    Assets held for sale 8  -  803,648 
    Deferred tax assets 7(b) 1,719,662  3,894,703 

          Total current assets





    196,661,580



    219,951,318


    Property, plant and equipment, net


    9, 22



    195,435,212



    219,684,994

    Lease prepayments, net 10  31,782,129  32,165,629 
    Intangible assets, net 11  161,418  239,487 
    Deferred tax assets 7(b) 6,543  42,911 

          Total assets




    $

    424,046,882


    $

    472,084,339

    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


    F-3

    F-2


    China BAK Battery,, Inc. Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated balance sheets

    As of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (In US$)


      
    Note
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Liabilities
           
    Current liabilities
              
    Short-term bank loans  11 $67,899,908 $89,870,586 
    Accounts and bills payable     48,316,250  45,588,583 
    Accrued expenses and other payables  13  25,880,985  15,467,192 
    Share-based payment liabilities  18  3,625,165  - 
               
    Total current liabilities     145,722,308  150,926,361 
               
    Long-term bank loans  12  -  29,291,154 
    Deferred tax liabilities  7(b) 304,957  279,597 
               
    Total liabilities     146,027,265  180,497,112 
               
    Commitments and contingencies  20          
               
    Shareholders’ equity
              
    Ordinary shares US$ 0.001 par value;          
    100,000,000 authorized; 48,885,896 and 49,250,853 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and 2007 respectively     48,886  49,251 
    Additional paid-in-capital     68,126,689  74,310,509 
    Statutory reserves     5,791,718  6,426,977 
    Retained earnings     36,212,357  36,060,426 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income     3,448,379  9,884,749 
               
    Total shareholders’ equity     113,628,029  126,731,912 
               
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity    $259,655,294 $307,229,024 

                                                                                                                                                                           &nbs p;                          Note  2008  2009 
              
    Liabilities         
    Current liabilities         
    Short-term bank loans 12 $ 105,598,170 $ 139,159,380 
    Current maturities of long-term bank loans 13  8,799,848  16,114,146 
    Accounts and bills payable    57,486,716  92,571,516 
    Accrued expenses and other payables 14  21,581,182  18,425,271 

          Total current liabilities





    193,465,916



    266,270,313


    Long-term bank loans, less current maturities


    13



    55,732,366



    39,552,906

    Deferred revenue 15  7,685,200  7,441,806 
    Other long-term payables    -  1,940,217 
    Deferred tax liabilities 7(b) 91,400  278,227 

          Total liabilities





    256,974,882



    315,483,469


    Commitments and contingencies


    22








    Shareholders’ equity









    Ordinary shares US$ 0.001 par value;
       100,000,000 authorized; 57,676,481 and 57,737,481 issued and outstanding
       as of September 30, 2008 and 2009 respectively










    57,677






    57,738


    Donated shares    14,101,689  14,101,689 
    Additional paid-in capital    97,286,286  101,161,455 
    Statutory reserves    6,917,943  7,227,195 
    Retained earnings    27,628,860  13,328,115 
    Accumulated other comprehensive income    25,146,155  24,791,288 
              
         171,138,610  160,667,480 
         Less: Treasury shares    (4,066,610) (4,066,610)

          Total shareholders’ equity





    167,072,000



    156,600,870


    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity




    $

    424,046,882


    $

    472,084,339

    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-4

    F-3


    China BAK Battery,, Inc. Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated statements of incomeoperations and comprehensive income
    / (loss)
    For the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007
    2009

    (In US$)


      
    Note
     
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
              
              
    Net revenues  23 $101,921,583 $143,829,016 $145,860,899 
    Cost of revenues  8, 17  (76,046,927) (104,196,278) (120,254,925)
                  
    Gross profit     25,874,656  39,632,738  25,605,974 
                  
    Operating expenses:             
    Research and development costs  8, 17  (541,735) (2,935,134) (3,957,145)
    Sales and marketing expenses  8, 17  (3,854,490) (5,054,624) (4,695,604)
    General and administrative expenses  8, 17  (5,994,600) (9,071,615) (12,371,873)
                  
    Total operating expenses     (10,390,825) (17,061,373) (21,024,622)
                  
    Operating income     15,483,831  22,571,365  4,581,352 
                  
    Finance costs, net  16  (845,327) (1,888,313) (5,224,800)
    Gain on trading securities     -  279,260  - 
    Government grant income     -  -  1,034,685 
    Other expenses     (490,018) (204,854) (103,430)
                  
    Income before income taxes     14,148,486  20,757,458  287,807 
                  
    Income taxes  7(a) (651,938) (592,892) 195,521 
                  
    Net income    $13,496,548 $20,164,566 $483,328 
                  
    Other comprehensive income             
    - Foreign currency translation adjustment     1,005,425  2,443,124  6,436,370 
                  
    Comprehensive income    $14,501,973 $22,607,690 $6,919,698 
                  
                  
    Net income per share:             
    -Basic  15 $0.35 $0.41 $0.01 
                  
    -Diluted  15 $0.35 $0.41 $0.01 
                  
    Weighted average number of ordinary shares:
                 
    -Basic  15  38,288,874  48,879,608  48,979,115 
                  
      15  38,408,625  48,912,963  49,442,285 

      Note  2007  2008  2009 
                 
    Net revenues 24 $ 145,860,899 $ 245,347,569 $ 211,143,971 
    Cost of revenues 9,19  (120,254,925) (214,441,714) (184,387,559)
                 
    Gross profit    25,605,974  30,905,855  26,756,412 
    Operating expenses:            
       Research and development expenses 9, 19  (3,957,145) (6,252,106) (5,643,369)
       Sales and marketing expenses 9, 19  (4,695,604) (5,802,655) (6,176,294)
       General and administrative expenses 9, 19  (12,371,873) (19,347,625) (21,989,400)
                 
       Total operating expenses    (21,024,622) (31,402,386) (33,809,063)
                 
    Operating income / (loss)    4,581,352  (496,531) (7,052,651)
                 
    Finance costs, net 18  (5,224,800) (11,020,808) (9,355,983)
    Government grant income    1,034,685  1,774,375  636,468 
    Other (expenses) / income    (103,430) 757,151  528,091 
                 
    Income / (loss) before income taxes    287,807  (8,985,813) (15,244,075)
                 
    Income tax benefit 7(a) 195,521  1,045,213  1,252,582 
                 
    Net income / (loss)   $ 483,328 $ (7,940,600)$ (13,991,493)
    Other comprehensive income / (loss)            
       - Foreign currency translation adjustment    6,436,370  15,261,406  (354,867)
                 
    Comprehensive income / (loss)   $ 6,919,698 $ 7,320,806 $ (14,346,360)

    Net income / (loss) per share:












       - Basic 17 $ 0.01 $ (0.15)$ (0.25)
       - Diluted 17 $ 0.01 $ (0.15)$ (0.25)
    Weighted average number of ordinary shares:            
       - Basic 17  48,979,115  52,313,768  56,964,129 
       - Diluted 17  49,442,285  52,313,768  56,964,129 

    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-5

    F-4 


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity

    For the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007
    2009

    (In US$)

        Ordinary shares Additional     Accumulated other comprehensive Total share- 
        Number of   paid-in- Statutory Retained income/ holders’ 
     Note shares amount capital reserves earnings (loss) equity 
                      
    Balance as of October 1, 2004     31,225,642 $31,226 $12,052,845 $1,724,246 $6,621,539 $(170)$20,429,686 
    Net income     -  -  -  -  13,496,548  -  13,496,548 
    Reverse acquisition  1  1,152,458  1,152  -  -  (2,824) -  (1,672)
    Issuance of ordinary shares, net of transaction costs of US$ 5,070,091  14  16,500,296  16,500  55,362,656  -  -  -  55,379,156 
    Appropriation to statutory reserves     -  -  -  1,309,895  (1,309,895) -  - 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment     -  -  -  -  -  1,005,425  1,005,425 
                              
    Balance as of September 30, 2005     48,878,396  48,878  67,415,501  3,034,141  18,805,368  1,005,255  90,309,143 
    Net income     -  -  -  -  20,164,566  -  20,164,566 
    Share-based compensation for employee stock awards  18  -  -  2,625,269  -  -  -  2,625,269 
    Cancellation of 1,400,000 employee stock options, replaced by restricted shares awards which are classified as liability award
      18  -  -  (2,045,393) -  -  -  (2,045,393)
    Share-based compensation for common stock granted to non-employee directors  18  -  -  131,320  -  -  -  131,320 
    Issuance of common stock to non-employee directors  18  7,500  8  (8) -  -  -  - 
    Appropriation to statutory reserves     -  -  -  2,757,577  (2,757,577) -  - 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment     -  -  -  -  -  2,443,124  2,443,124 
                              
    Balance as of September 30, 2006     48,885,896  48,886  68,126,689  5,791,718  36,212,357  3,448,379  113,628,029 
    Net income     -  -  -  -  483,328  -  483,328 
    Issuance of 914,994 shares of restricted stock and reclassification of liability-classified awards  18  -  -  4,969,974  -  -  -  4,969,974 
    Share-based compensation for stock options awards  18  -  -  1,173,033  -  -  -  1,173,033 
    Share-based compensation for common stock granted to non-employee directors  18  -  -  41,178  -  -  -  41,178 
    Issuance of common stock to employees and non-employee directors  18  364,957  365  (365) -  -  -  - 
    Appropriation to statutory reserves     -  -  -  635,259  (635,259) -  - 
    Foreign currency translation adjustment     -  -  -  -  -  6,436,370  6,436,370 
    Balance as of September 30, 2007     49,250,853 $49,251 $74,310,509 $6,426,977 $36,060,426 $9,884,749 $126,731,912 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Accumulated

     

     

     

     

     

    Total

     

     

    Ordinary shares

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    other

     

    Treasury shares

     

    share-

     

     

     

    Number of

     

     

     

    Donated

     

    Additional

     

    Statutory

     

    Retained

     

    comprehensive

     

    Number of

     

     

     

    holders’

     

     

    Note

    shares

     

    Amount

     

    shares

     

    paid-in capital

     

    reserves

     

    earnings

     

    income

     

    shares

     

    Amount

     

    equity

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

                              

     

    Balance as of September 30, 2006

     

     

     

    48,885,896

     

    $

    48,886

     

    $

     

    $

    68,126,689

     

    $

    5,791,718

     

    $

    36,212,357

     

    $

    3,448,379

     

     

     

    $

     

    $

    113,628,029

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Net income

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    483,328

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    483,328

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    2006 escrow shares donated by Mr. Xiangqian Li and released to investors

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    7,955,358

     

     

    (7,955,358

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Share-based compensation for employee stock option awards

     

    20

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1,173,033

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1,173,033

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of 914,994 shares of restricted stocks and reclassification of liability-classified awards

     

    20

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    4,969,974

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    4,969,974

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Share-based compensation for common stock granted to employees and non-employee directors

     

    20

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    41,178

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    41,178

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of common stock to employees and non-employee directors

     

    20

     

    364,957

     

     

    365

     

     

     

     

    (365

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Appropriation to statutory reserves

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    635,259

     

     

    (635,259

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    6,436,370

     

     

     

     

     

     

    6,436,370

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Balance as of September 30, 2007

     

     

     

    49,250,853

     

    $

    49,251

     

    $

    7,955,358

     

    $

    66,355,151

     

    $

    6,426,977

     

    $

    36,060,426

     

    $

    9,884,749

     

     

     

    $

     

    $

    126,731,912

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    2005 escrow shares donated by Mr. Xiangqian Li

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    6,146,331

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (1,089,775

    )

     

    (6,146,331

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    2005 escrow shares settlement

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (2,079,721

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    368,745

     

     

    2,079,721

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Net loss

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (7,940,600

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (7,940,600

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Share-based compensation for employee stock option awards and issuance of restricted stock

     

    20

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    3,780,074

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    3,780,074

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Exercise of stock options awards

     

    20

     

    277,500

     

     

    278

     

     

     

     

    1,502,980

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1,503,258

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of common stock to employees

     

    20

     

    530,560

     

     

    530

     

     

     

     

    (530

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of common stock to non-employee directors

     

    20

     

    15,000

     

     

    15

     

     

     

     

    (15

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of new common stock

     

     

     

    7,602,568

     

     

    7,603

     

     

     

     

    27,728,347

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    27,735,950

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Appropriation to statutory reserves

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    490,966

     

     

    (490,966

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    15,261,406

     

     

     

     

     

     

    15,261,406

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Balance as of September 30, 2008

     

     

     

    57,676,481

     

    $

    57,677

     

    $

    14,101,689

     

    $

    97,286,286

     

    $

    6,917,943

     

    $

    27,628,860

     

    $

    25,146,155

     

     

    (721,030)

     

    $

    (4,066,610)

     

    $

    167, 072,000

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Net loss

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (13,991,493

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (13,991,493

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Share-based compensation for employee stock option awards

     

    20

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    3,724,901

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    3,724,901

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Exercise of stock options awards

     

    20

     

    46,000

     

     

    46

     

     

     

     

    150,283

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    150,329

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Issuance of common stock to non-employee directors

     

    20

     

    15,000

     

     

    15

     

     

     

     

    (15

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Appropriation to statutory reserves

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    309,252

     

     

    (309,252

    )

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Foreign currency translation adjustment

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (354,867)

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (354,867)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Balance as of September 30, 2009

     

     

     

    57,737,481

     

    $

    57,738

     

    $

    14,101,689

     

    $

    101,161,455

     

    $

    7,227,195

     

    $

    13,328,115

     

    $

    24,791,288

     

     

    (721,030)

     

    $

    (4,066,610)

     

    $

    156,600,870

     


    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-6

    F-5


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated statements of cash flows

    For the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007
    2009

    (In US$)


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Cash flow from operating activities
           
    Net income $13,496,548 $20,164,566 $483,328 
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by / (used in) operating activities:          
    Depreciation and amortization  3,580,791  5,815,706  8,911,704 
    Provision for / (recovery of) doubtful debts  769,807  (555,593) 1,825,149 
    Provision for obsolete inventories  -  -  1,639,024 
    Share-based compensation  -  4,336,361  2,559,020 
    Deferred income taxes  98,288  72,810  (609,684)
               
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
    Trade accounts receivable  (23,675,275) (19,938,136) 2,617,075 
    Inventories  7,839,759  (25,692,710) (11,306,910)
    Prepayments and other receivables  (572,594) 456,086  (218,914)
    Accounts and bills payable  5,005,424  4,273,690  (3,037,756)
    Accrued expenses and other payables  1,471,678  5,382,463  123,504 
               
    Net cash provided by / (used in) operating activities  8,014,426  (5,684,757) 2,985,540 
               
    Cash flow from investing activities
              
               
    Purchases of property, plant and equipment  (30,593,615) (41,382,163) (48,792,746)
    Addition in lease prepayment  -  -  (17,041,954)
    Purchases of intangible assets  (2,015) (33,738) (60,756)
               
    Net cash used in investing activities $(30,595,630)$(41,415,901)$(65,895,456)

      2007  2008  2009 
    Cash flow from operating activities         
    Net income / (loss)$ 483,328 $ (7,940,600)$ (13,991,493)
    Adjustments to reconcile net income / (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
             Depreciation and amortization 8,911,704  13,249,392  12,831,899 
             Provision for doubtful debts 1,825,149  1,943,006  7,724,963 
             Provision for obsolete inventories 1,639,024  609,950  928,915 
             Share-based compensation 2,559,020  3,780,074  3,724,901 
             Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment -  194,572  6,534 
             Deferred income taxes (609,684) (1,152,379) (2,024,214)
             Deferred revenue -  (281,786) (234,124)
             Exchange loss / (gain) -  1,326,524  (48,541)

    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:









             Trade accounts receivable 2,617,075  (14,600,168) (8,375,251)
             Inventories (11,306,910) (2,223,341) 1,043,668 
             Prepayments and other receivables (218,914) (2,564,878) 383,283 
             Accounts and bills payable (3,037,756) 6,934,131  36,331,394 
             Accrued expenses and other payables 123,504  3,429,849  89,892 

    Net cash provided by operating activities


    2,985,540



    2,704,346



    38,391,826


    Cash flow from investing activities










    Purchases of property, plant and equipment


    (48,792,746

    )


    (45,774,710

    )


    (40,431,374

    )
    Payment of lease prepayment (17,041,954) (5,454,339) (1,077,342)
    Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment -  786,401  10,716 
    Purchases of intangible assets (60,756) (108,501) (140,672)

    Net cash used in investing activities

    $

    (65,895,456

    )

    $

    (50,551,149

    )

    $

    (41,638,672

    )

    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-7

    F-6


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Consolidated statements of cash flows

    For the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (In US$)


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Cash flow from financing activities
           
            
    Proceeds from borrowings $63,011,550 $99,036,333 $157,532,382 
    Repayment of borrowings  (52,582,798) (70,681,655) (111,115,433)
    (Increase) / decrease in pledged deposits  (12,272,211) 6,420,291  8,827,193 
    Amounts received from related parties  639,220  271,873  - 
    Repayments to Changzhou          
    Lihai Investment Consulting Co., Ltd.  (1,812,316) -  - 
    Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net  55,379,156  -  - 
    Contribution from shareholders acquiring shares of BAK International Limited  11,500,000  -  - 
    Distribution to shareholders in connection with the acquisition of shares of China BAK Battery, Inc.  (11,500,000) -  - 
               
    Net cash provided by financing activities  52,362,601  35,046,842  55,244,142 
               
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
      
    62,211
      
    97,587
      
    762,732
     
               
    Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
      
    29,843,608
      
    (11,956,229
    )
     
    (6,903,042
    )
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year
      
    3,212,176
      
    33,055,784
      
    21,099,555
     
               
    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
     
    $
    33,055,784
     
    $
    21,099,555
     
    $
    14,196,513
     
               
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
              
               
    Cash received during the year for:          
    Bills receivable discounted to bank $11,726,378 $19,813,271 $7,019,450 
               
    Proceeds from disposal of trading securities $- $3,981,274 $- 
               
    Cash paid during the year for:          
    Income taxes $487,808 $747,548 $306,992 
               
    Interest, net of amounts capitalized $842,145 $1,874,351 $5,659,556 
               
    Purchases of trading securities $- $3,702,014 $- 
               
    Investing activities not requiring the use of cash and cash equivalents:          
    Sale of equipment in exchange for inventories $- $1,076,226 $- 
               
              
    settlement of prepayments and other receivables $- $561,588 $- 

      2007  2008  2009 
    Cash flow from financing activities         
    Proceeds from borrowings$ 157,532,382 $ 159,913,210 $ 176,316,019 
    Repayment of borrowings (111,115,433) (122,576,645) (151,448,641)
    Decrease / (increase) in pledged deposits 8,827,193  588,058  (26,640,989)
    Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net -  29,239,208  150,329 
              
    Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities 55,244,142  67,163,831  (1,623,282)
              
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 762,732  2,193,293  (158,354)
              
    Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents (6,903,042) 21,510,321  (5,028,482)
    Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year 21,099,555  14,196,513  35,706,834 
              
    Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year$ 14,196,513 $ 35,706,834 $ 30,678,352 
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:         
    Cash received during the year for:         
             Bills receivable discounted to banks$ 7,019,450 $ 18,000,115 $ 27,147,571 
    Cash paid during the year for:         
             Income taxes$ 306,992 $ 141,918 $ 625,817 
             Interest, net of amounts capitalized$ 5,659,556 $ 9,615,904 $ 9,046,153 
    Non-cash movements affecting financing transactions:         
             2006 escrow shares donated by Mr. Xiangqian Li and release to investors$ 7,955,358 $ - $ - 
             2005 escrow shares donated by Mr. Xiangqian Li$ - $ 6,146,331 $ - 
             2005 escrow shares settlement$ - $ 2,079,721 $ - 
             Government grants to subsidize additional cost of land use rights$ - $ 7,889,991 $ - 

    See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-8

    F-7



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007

    2009

    1.

    Principal Activities, Basis of Presentation and Organization

    Principal Activities

    China BAK Battery, Inc. (“China BAK”) is a corporation formed in the State of Nevada on October 4, 1999 as Medina Copy, Inc. The Company changed its name to Medina Coffee, Inc. on October 6, 1999 and subsequently changed its name to China BAK Battery, Inc. on February 14, 2005. China BAK and its subsidiaries (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the “Company”) are principally engaged in the manufacture, commercialization and distribution of a wide variety of standard and customized lithium ion (known as “Li-ion” or “Li-ion cell”) rechargeable batteries for use in cellular telephones, as well as various other portable electronic applications, including high-power handset telephones, laptop computers, power tools, digital cameras, video camcorders, MP3 players, electric bicycles, hybrid/electric motors, and general industrial applications.

    The shares of the Company were traded in the over-the-counter market through the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board from 2005 until May 31, 2006, when the Company obtained approval to list its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market, and trading commenced that same date under the symbol “CBAK”.

    Basis of Presentation and Organization

    As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s subsidiaries consist of: i) BAK International Limited (“BAK International”), a wholly owned limited liability company incorporated in Hong Kong on December 29, 2003 as BATCO International Limited, which changed its name to BAK International Limited on November 3, 2004; ii) Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen BAK”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on August 3, 2001 in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”); iii) BAK Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“BAK Electronics”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on August 15, 2005 in the PRC; iv) BAK International (Tianjin) Ltd. (“BAK Tianjin”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on December 12, 2006 in the PRC; v) BAK Battery Canada Ltd. (“BAK Canada”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on December 20, 2006 in Canada as BAK Canada Battery Ltd., which changed its name to BAK Battery Canada Ltd. on December 22, 2006; vi) BAK Europe GmbH (“BAK Europe”), a wholly owned limited liability company established in Germany on November 28, 2007; and vii) BAK Telecom India Private Limited (“BAK India”), a wholly owned limited liability company established in India on August 14, 2008. BAK International beneficially owns 100% of BAK India partly through a nominee agreement with one of its employees.

    BAK Tianjin was established in Tianjin Technology Industrial District on December 12, 2006 as a wholly owned subsidiary of BAK International with registered capital of US$99,990,000. Pursuant to BAK Tianjin’s articles of association and relevant PRC regulations, BAK International was required to contribute US$20,000,000 to BAK Tianjin as capital (representing 20% of BAK Tianjin’s registered capital) before March 11, 2007. An extension from the Business Administration Bureau of Beichen District, Tianjin, was obtained to make this contribution no later than December 11, 2007. On November 16, 2007, BAK International contributed approximately US$20,000,000 capital to BAK Tianjin. The remaining US$79,990,000 was originally required to be fully contributed no later than December 11, 2008 and an extension from the Business Administration Bureau of Beichen District, Tianjin, was obtained to make this contribution no later than December 11, 2009. On November 16, 2009, BAK International contributed approximately US$9,000,000 capital to BAK Tianjin and as of November 16, 2009, the total contribution from BAK International was US$29,000,000. We are discussing with the authorities to extend this deadline and no action has been taken by the authorities. BAK Tianjin is principally engaged in the manufacture of advanced lithium ion batteries for use in cordless power tools and other applications.

    Pursuant to Shenzhen BAK’s articles of association and relevant PRC regulations, BAK International was required to contribute about US$5.72 million to Shenzhen BAK as capital (representing 7% of Shenzhen BAK’s registered capital) no later than October 2008. On May 5, 2009, an approval from Shenzhen Bureau of Trade and Industry was obtained to reduce the required registered capital to US$76,877,480, which had been fully paid up, and on June 22, 2009, an updated business license of Shenzhen BAK from the Business Administration Bureau of Shenzhen was obtained.

    F-8 

    Principal Activities

    China BAK Battery, Inc. (“China BAK”) is a corporation formed in the State of Nevada on October 4, 1999 as Medina Copy, Inc. The Company changed its name to Medina Coffee, Inc. on October 6, 1999 and subsequently changed its name to China BAK Battery, Inc. on February 14, 2005. China BAK and its subsidiaries (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the “Company”) are principally engaged in the manufacture, commercialization and distribution of a wide variety of standard and customized lithium ion (known as "Li-ion" or "Li-ion cell") rechargeable batteries for use in cellular telephones, as well as various other portable electronic applications, including high-power handset telephones, laptop computers, power tools, digital cameras, video camcorders, MP3 players, electric bicycles, hybrid/electric motors, and general industrial applications.

    The shares of the Company traded in the over-the-counter market through the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board from 2005 until May 31, 2006, when the Company obtained approval to list its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market, and trading commenced that same date under the symbol "CBAK".

    Basis of Presentation and Organization

    As of September 30, 2007, the Company’s subsidiaries consist of: i) BAK International Limited (“BAK International”), a wholly owned limited liability company incorporated in Hong Kong on December 29, 2003 as BATCO International Limited, which changed its name to BAK International Limited on November 3, 2004; ii) Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen BAK”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on August 3, 2001 in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”); iii) BAK Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“BAK Electronics”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on August 15, 2005 in the PRC; iv) BAK International (Tianjin) Ltd. (“BAK Tianjin”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on December 12, 2006 in the PRC; and v) BAK Battery Canada Ltd. (“BAK Canada”), a wholly owned limited liability company established on December 20, 2006 in Canada as BAK Canada Battery Ltd., which changed its name to BAK Battery Canada Ltd. on December 22, 2006.

    BAK Tianjin was established in Tianjin Technology Industrial District on December 12, 2006 as a wholly owned subsidiary of BAK International with registered capital of US$99,990,000. Pursuant to BAK Tianjin’s articles of association and relevant PRC regulations, BAK International is required to contribute US$20,000,000 to BAK Tianjin as capital (representing 20% of BAK Tianjin’s registered capital) before March 11, 2007. The remaining US$79,990,000 shall be fully contributed no later than December 11, 2008. BAK Tianjin will be principally engaged in the manufacture of advanced lithium ion batteries for use in light electric vehicles and uninterruptible power supply. As of September 30, 2007, BAK International had not contributed the US$20,000,000 capital to BAK Tianjin, and was in the course of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the extension of the injection period.
    F-9



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    Basis of Presentation and Organization (continued)


    On November 6, 2004, BAK International, a non-operating holding company that had substantially the same shareholders as Shenzhen BAK, entered into a share swap transaction with the shareholders of Shenzhen BAK on November 6, 2004 for the purpose of the subsequent reverse acquisition of the interest of China BAKCompany as described below. Pursuant to the terms of the share swap transaction, BAK International acquired all of the parties exchanged all outstanding shares of their capital stockShenzhen BAK for US$11.5 million in cash, and as a result, BAK International becamewhile the parent company of Shenzhen BAK. Certain shareholders of Shenzhen BAK representing ownership interestsacquired substantially all of approximately 1.85%, elected not to acquirethe outstanding shares in BAK International. The non-participating shareholders of Shenzhen BAK sold their right to acquire their proportional ownership interests in BAK International for cash, and the proportionate interestsUS$11.5 million in cash. As a result, Shenzhen BAK International to which the non-participating shareholders were entitled were acquired by the transferees.became a wholly-owned subsidiary of BAK International. After the share swap transaction between BAK International and the shareholders of Shenzhen BAK was complete,completed, there were 31,225,642 shares of BAK International stock outstanding, exactly the same as the number of shares of capital stock of Shenzhen BAK that had been outstanding immediately prior to the share swap, and the shareholders of BAK International were substantially the same as the shareholders of Shenzhen BAK prior to the share purchases.swap. Consequently, the share purchasesswap transaction between BAK International and the shareholders of Shenzhen BAK have beenwas accounted for as a reverse acquisition of Shenzhen BAK with no adjustment to the historical basis of the assets and liabilities of Shenzhen BAK, and the operations were consolidated as though the transactions occurred as of the beginning of the first accounting period presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.


    BAK.

    On January 20, 2005, the Company completed a share swap transaction with the shareholders of BAK International. The share swap transaction, also referred to as the “reverse acquisition” of the Company, was consummated under Nevada law pursuant to the terms of a Securities Exchange Agreement entered by and among China BAK, BAK International and the shareholders of BAK International on January 20, 2005. Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Agreement, the Company issued 39,826,075 shares of common stock, par value US$0.001 per share, to the shareholders of BAK International (including 31,225,642 shares to the original shareholders and 8,600,433 shares to new investors who had purchased shares in the private placement described below), representing approximately 97.2% of the Company’s post-exchange issued and outstanding common stock, in exchange for 100% of the outstanding capital stock of BAK International.


    The share swap transaction has been accounted for as a capital-raising transaction of the Company whereby the historical financial statements and operations of Shenzhen BAK are consolidated using historical carrying amounts. The 1,152,458 shares of China BAK outstanding prior to the stock exchange transaction were accounted for at the net book value at the time of the transaction, which was a deficit of US$1,672. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the capital-raising transaction of the Company as if the transaction occurred as of the beginning of the first period presented.


    Also on January 20, 2005, immediately prior to consummating the share swap transaction, BAK International executed a private placement of its common stock with unrelated investors whereby it issued an aggregate of 8,600,433 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of US$17,000,000. In conjunction with this financing, Mr. Xiangqian Li, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, agreed to place 2,179,550 shares of the Company's common stock owned by him into an escrow account pursuant to an Escrow Agreement dated January 20, 2005 (the “Escrow Agreement”). Pursuant to the Escrow Agreement, 50% of the escrowed shares were to be released to the investors in the private placement if audited net income of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 was not at least US$12,000,000, and the remaining 50% were to be released to investors in the private placement if audited net income of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 was not at least US$27,000,000. If the audited net income of the Company for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 reached the above-mentioned targets, the 2,179,550 shares would be released to Mr. Xiangqian Li in the same manner:amount of 50% upon reaching the 2005 target and the remaining 50% upon reaching the 2006 target.


    F-10


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    Basis of Presentation and Organization (continued)

    Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”), escrow agreements such as the Escrow Arrangement constitutes a compensatory plan to Mr. Xiangqian Li. Accordingly, a compensation charge is required to be recorded in the financial statements of the Company should shares be released from escrow toone established by Mr. Xiangqian Li upon thegenerally constitute compensation if, following attainment of a performance thresholds being achieved.threshold, shares are returned to a company officer. The Company determined that without consideration of the compensation charge, the performance thresholds for the year ended September 30, 2005 would be achieved. However, after consideration of thea related compensation charge, the Company determined that such thresholds would not have been achieved. The Company also determined that, even without consideration of thea compensation charge, the performance thresholds for the year ended September 30, 2006 would not be achieved. No compensation charge was recorded by the Company for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006.

    F-9


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    Basis of Presentation and Organization (continued)

    While the 1,089,775 escrow shares relating to the 2005 performance threshold were previously released to Mr. Xiangqian Li, Mr. Xiangqian Li had undertakenexecuted a further undertaking on August 21, 2006 to return those shares to the escrow agent for the distribution to the relevant investors based on his understanding that such investors would become entitled to those shares upon the Company’s recognition of the related compensation charge although, absent the compensation charge, the 2005 performance targets would be met and such investors would not be entitled to such shares.investors. However, such shares were not returned to the escrow agent, but, pursuant to a Delivery of Make Good Shares, Settlement and Release Agreement between the settlement agreement described below, have been returnedCompany, BAK International and Mr. Li entered into on October 22, 2007 (the “Li Settlement Agreement”), such shares were ultimately delivered to the Company.Company as described below. Because the Company failed to satisfy the performance threshold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, the remaining 1,089,775 escrow shares relating to the fiscal year 2006 performance threshold were released to the relevant investors.


    On October 22, As Mr. Li has not retained any of the shares placed into escrow, and as the investors party to the Escrow Agreement are only shareholders of the Company and do not have and are not expected to have any other relationship to the Company, the Company has not recorded a compensation charge for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2006.

    At the time the escrow shares relating to the 2006 performance threshold were transferred to the investors in fiscal year 2007, the Company entered intoshould have recognized a Deliverycredit to donated shares and a debit to additional paid-in capital, both of Make Good Shares, Settlementwhich are elements of shareholders’ equity. This entry is not material because total ordinary shares issued and Release Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) withoutstanding, total shareholders’ equity and total assets do not change; nor is there any impact on income or earnings per share. Therefore, previously filed consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 will not be restated. This share transfer has been reflected in these financial statements by reclassifying the balances of certain items as of October 1, 2007. The balances of donated shares and additional paid-in capital as of October 1, 2007 were credited and debited by US$7,955,358 respectively, as set out in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity.

    In November 2007, Mr. Xiangqian Li and BAK International. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Xiangqian Li agreed to deliverdelivered the 1,089,775 shares related to the 2005 performance threshold to BAK International;International pursuant to the Li Settlement Agreement; BAK International in turn agreed to deliverdelivered the shares to the Company. Such shares (other than those issued to investors pursuant to the 2008 Settlement Agreements, as described below) are now held by the Company. Upon receipt of these shares, the Company agreed to releaseand BAK International released all claims and causes of action against Mr. Xiangqian Li and certain other persons regarding the shares. On October 25, 2007, the 1,089,775 shares, were delivered toand Mr. Xiangqian Li released all claims and causes of action against the Company and such shares are now held as treasuryBAK International regarding the shares. Under the terms of the Li Settlement Agreement, the Company is obligated to commencecommenced negotiations with the investors who participated in the Company’s January 2005 private placement in order to achieve a complete settlement of BAK International’s obligations (and the Company’s obligations to the extent it has any) under the applicable agreements with such investors.


    Beginning on March 13, 2008, the Company has entered into settlement agreements (the “2008 Settlement Agreements”) with certain investors in the January 2005 private placement.

    Pursuant to the 2008 Settlement Agreements, the Company and the settling investors have agreed, without any admission of liability, to a settlement and mutual release from all claims relating to the January 2005 private placement, including all claims relating to the escrow shares related to the 2005 performance threshold that had been placed into escrow by Mr. Xiangqian Li, as well as all claims, including claims for liquidated damages relating to registration rights granted in connection with the January 2005 private placement. Under the 2008 Settlement Agreement, the Company has made settlement payments to each of the settling investors of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock equivalent to 50% of the number of the escrow shares related to the 2005 performance threshold these investors had claimed; aggregate settlement payments as of September 30, 2009 amounted to 368,745 shares. Share payments to date have been made in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and/or other applicable provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In accordance with the 2008 Settlement Agreements, the Company filed a registration statement covering the resale of such shares which was declared effective by the SEC on June 26, 2008.

    The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP.


    This basis of accounting differs in certain material respects from that used for the preparation of the books of account of the Company’s principal subsidiaries, which are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles and the relevant financial regulations applicable to enterprises with limited liabilities established in the PRC (“PRC GAAP”), in Hong Kong, Germany, India or in Canada, the accounting standards used in the places of their domicile. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect necessary adjustments not recorded in the books of account of the Company's subsidiaries to present them in conformity with US GAAP.

    F-11

    F-10


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    2

    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices


    (a)

    (a)

    Principles of Consolidation


    The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

    (b)

    The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

    (b)

    Cash and Cash Equivalents


    Cash consists of cash on hand and in banks. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments, with initial terms of less than three months to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2006 and 2007, there were no cash equivalents.

    (c)

    Cash consists of cash on hand and in banks. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments, with initial terms of less than three months to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2008 and 2009, there were no cash equivalents.

    (c)

    Trade Accounts Receivable

    Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing trade accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in the general and administrative expenses.

    Outstanding accounts balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Accounts balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. To date, the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers, except for outstanding bills receivable discounted with banks (see note 22) that are subject to recourse for non-payment.

    (d)

    Inventories

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and market. The cost of inventories is determined using weighted average cost method, and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In case of finished goods and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity.

    The Company regularly reviews the cost of inventories against their estimated fair market value and records a lower of cost or market write-down for inventories that have cost in excess of estimated market value.

    (e)

    Assets held for sale

    The Company classifies long-lived assets to be sold as held-for-sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: management having the appropriate authority commits to a plan to sell the asset; the asset is available for immediate sale in its present condition; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to sell the asset have been initiated; sale of the asset is probable and expected to occur within one year; the asset is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Assets held-for-sale are not depreciated and are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.


    Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing trade accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in the general and administrative expenses.

    Outstanding accounts balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Accounts balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. To date, the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers, except for outstanding bills receivable discounted with banks (see note 20) that are subject to recourse for non-payment.

    (d)
    Inventories

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and market. The cost of inventories is determined using weighted average cost method, and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In case of finished goods and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity.

    The Company regularly reviews the cost of inventories against their estimated fair market value and records a lower of cost or market write-down for inventories that have cost in excess of estimated market value.

    (e)
    Investment Securities

    The Company classifies its equity securities into trading securities or available-for-sale securities. Trading securities are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. All securities not included in trading securities are classified as available-for-sale securities.

    Trading and available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on trading securities are included in the net income. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from net income and are reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined on a specific-identification basis.

    F-12

    F-11



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (e)(f)
    Investment Securities (continued)

    A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged as an expense to the statement of income and comprehensive income and a new cost basis for the security is established. To determine whether an impairment is other-than-temporary, the Company considers whether it has the ability and intent to hold the investment until a market price recovery and considers whether evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable outweighs evidence to the contrary. Evidence considered in this assessment includes the reasons for the impairment, the severity and duration of the impairment, changes in value subsequent to year end, and forecasted performance of the investee.

    Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related available-for-sale security as an adjustment to yield using the effective-interest method. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.

    (f)

    Property, Plant and Equipment

    Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated based on the straight- line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:


    Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are calculated based on the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

    Buildings30-40 years
    Machinery and equipment5-12 years
    Office equipment5 years
    Motor vehicles8 years
    Leasehold improvements1-5 years


    Construction in progress mainly represents expenditures in respect of the Company’s new corporate campus, including offices, factories and staff dormitories, under construction. All direct costs relating to the acquisition or construction of the Company’s new corporate campus and equipment, including interest charges on borrowings, are capitalized as construction in progress. No depreciation is provided in respect of construction in progress.

    (g)

    The cost and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment sold are removed from the consolidated balance sheets and resulting gains or losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income / (loss). Construction in progress mainly represents expenditures in respect of the Company’s corporate campus, including offices, factories and staff dormitories, under construction. All direct costs relating to the acquisition or construction of the Company’s corporate campus and equipment, including interest charges on borrowings, are capitalized as construction in progress. No depreciation is provided in respect of construction in progress.

    (g)

    Lease Prepayments


    Lease prepayments represent the cost of land use rights in the PRC. Land use rights are carried at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of rights of 50 years.

    (h)

    Lease prepayments represent the cost of land use rights in the PRC. Land use rights are carried at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of rights of 50 years.

    (h)

    Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation

    The reporting currency of the Company is the United States dollar (“US dollar”). Transactions denominated in currencies other than US dollar are translated into US dollar at the average rates for the period. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than US dollar are translated into US dollar at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in the other (expenses) / income in the statement of operations and comprehensive income / (loss).

    The financial records of the Company’s operating subsidiaries are maintained in their local currency, the Renminbi (“RMB”), which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates, and income and expenses items are translated using the average rate for the period. The translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income under shareholders’ equity.


    The reporting currency of the Company is the United States dollar (“US dollar”). Transactions denominated in currencies other than US dollar are translated into US dollar at the average rates for the period. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than US dollar are translated into US dollar at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. The resulting exchange differences are recorded in the other expenses in the statement of income and comprehensive income.

    The financial records of the Company’s operating subsidiaries are maintained in their local currency, the Renminbi (“RMB”), which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date, equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates, and income and expenses items are translated using the average rate for the period. The translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income under shareholders’ equity.

    F-13

    F-12



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (h)
    Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation (continued)

    (h)

    Foreign Currency Transactions and Translation (continued)

    RMB is not a fully convertible currency. All foreign exchange transactions involving RMB must take place either through the People’s Bank of China (the “PBOC”) or other institutions authorized to buy and sell foreign exchange. The exchange rates adopted for the foreign exchange transactions are the rates of exchange quoted by the PBOC, which are determined largely by supply and demand. Translation of amounts from RMB into US dollar has been made at the following exchange rates for the respective years:


    September 30, 2009
    Balance sheetRMB 6.8263 to US$1.00
    Statement of operations and comprehensive income / (loss)RMB 6.8340 to US$1.00
    September 30, 2008
    Balance sheetRMB 6.8183 to US$1.00
    Statement of operations and comprehensive incomeRMB 7.0976 to US$1.00
    September 30, 2007 
    Balance sheetRMB 7.5108 to US$1.00
    Statement of incomeoperations and comprehensive incomeRMB 7.7127 to US$1.00
    September 30, 2006
    Balance sheetRMB 7.90870 to US$ 1.00
    Statement of income and comprehensive incomeRMB 8.02857 to US$ 1.00
    September 30, 2005
    Balance sheetRMB 8.0920 to US$ 1.00
    Statement of income and comprehensive incomeRMB 8.2413 to US$ 1.00
    Commencing from July 21, 2005, China has adopted a managed floating exchange rate regime based on market demand and supply with reference to a basket of currencies. The exchange rate of the US dollar against the RMB was adjusted from approximately RMB 8.28 per US dollar to approximately RMB 8.11 per US dollar on July 21, 2005. Since then, the PBOC administers and regulates the exchange rate of US dollar against RMB taking into account demand and supply of RMB, as well as domestic and foreign economic and financial conditions.

    (i)
    Intangible Assets

    (i)

    Intangible Assets

    Intangible assets are stated in the balance sheet at cost less accumulated amortization. The costs of the intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The respective amortization periods for the intangible assets are as follows:


    Trademarks10 years
    Technology7 years
    Software3 - 5 years

    (j)
    Impairment of Long-lived Assets

    (j)

    Impairment of Long-lived Assets

    Long-lived assets, which include property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.


    Recoverability of long-lived assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.


    F-14

    F-13


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (k)
    Revenue Recognition

    (k)

    Revenue Recognition

    The Company recognizes revenue on product sales when products are delivered and the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable.


    Net sales of products represent the invoiced value of goods, net of value added taxes (“VAT”), sales returns, trade discounts and allowances. The Company is subject to VAT which is levied on the majority of the products of Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK ElectronicsTianjin at the rate of 17% on the invoiced value of sales. Output VAT is borne by customers in addition to the invoiced value of sales and input VAT is borne by the Company in addition to the invoiced value of purchases to the extent not refunded for export sales. Provision for sales returns are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period that revenue is recognized. The provision for sales returns, which is based on historical sales returns data, is the Company’s best estimate of the amounts of goods that will be returned from its customers.


    (l)
    Cost of Revenues

    (l)

    Cost of Revenues

    Cost of revenues consists primarily of material costs, employee compensation, depreciation and related expenses, which are directly attributable to the production of products. Write-down of inventory to lower of cost or market is also recorded in cost of revenues.


    (m)
    Income Taxes

    (m)

    Income Taxes

    Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statement of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss) in the period that includes the enactment date.

    (n)
    Research and Development and Advertising Costs

    (n)

    Research and Development and Advertising Expenses

    Research and development and advertising costsexpenses are expensed as incurred. Research and development costsexpenses consist primarily of remuneration for research and development staff, depreciation and maintenance expenses of research and development equipment and material costs for research and development. Advertising cost,expenses, included in sales and marketing expenses, amounted to US$297,998,138,639, US$234,37922,232 and US$138,63932,205 for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 respectively.

    (o)
    Bills Payable

    (o)

    Bills Payable

    Bills payable represent bills issued by financial institutions to the Company’s vendors. The Company’s vendors receive payments from the financial institutions directly upon maturity of the bills and the Company is obliged to repay the face value of the bills to the financial institutions.

    F-15

    F-14



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (p)
    Government Grants

    (p)

    Government Grants

    Receipts of government grants to encourage research and development activities which are non-refundable are credited to deferred income upon receipt. Government grants are used either for purchases of assets, or to subsidize the research and development expenses incurred.


    For purchases of assets, government grants are deducted from the carrying amountincurred, for compensation expenses already incurred or for good performance of the assets.Company.

    Grants applicable to land are amortized over the life of the depreciable facilities constructed on it. For the research and development expenses, the Company matches and offsets the government grants with the expenses of the research and development activities as specified in the grant approval document in the corresponding period when such expenses are incurred.


    Government For government grants received as compensation for expenses already incurred are recognisedrecognized as income in the period they become recognizable.

    Government grants of US$60,670794,635 and US$62,278614,107 were offset against the research and developmentfinance costs for the years ended September 30, 20052008 and 20062009, respectively. No government grants were offset against the research and developmentfinance costs for the year ended September 30, 2007. Government grants recorded as deferred income (Note 14(b)) amounted to US$777,625637,989 and US$579,166673,864 as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009, respectively.


    During the year ended September 30, 2007, the Company received grantsrecorded government grant income of US$1,034,685. US$777,289 of the grant was received to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior years for research and development activities and US$257,396 represents refund of value-added tax paid by Shenzhen BAK in prior years since Shenzhen BAK qualifies as a new and high technology enterprise.

    (q)
    Share-based Compensation
    Prior to October 1, 2005,

    During the year ended September 30, 2008, the Company appliedrecorded government grant income of US$1,774,375. US$1,000,338 of the intrinsic-value-based methodgrant was received to subsidize the interest expenses incurred by the Company in prior years for research and development activities, US$492,251 was received to reward the Company’s contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and US$281,786 represented amortization of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinions No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issuedgovernment subsidies received in relation to Employees” (“APB 25”)the additional cost of land use rights of BAK Industrial Park (Note 15).

    During the year ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded government grant income of US$636,468. US$402,344 of the grant was received to reward the Company’s contributions to the Shenzhen area’s economy and related interpretations includingUS$234,124 represented amortization of government subsidies received in relation to the additional cost of land use rights of BAK Industrial Park (Note 15).

    (q)

    Share-based Compensation

    In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB 25” to account for its fixed-plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded only if on the date of grant, the market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price.issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by the accounting standards, the Company elected to apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, as amended.

    In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (Revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”)., now included in ASC Topic 718. SFAS No. 123R requires the Company to measure and recognize compensation expenses for an award of equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value. The cost is recognized over the vesting period (or the requisite service period). SFAS No. 123R also requires the Company to measure the cost of a liability-classified award based on its current fair value. The fair value of the award will be remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the settlement date. Changes in farfair value during the requisite service period will beare recognized as compensation cost over that period. Further, SFAS No. 123R requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense related to stock-based compensation.
    This statement replaces SFAS 123 and supersedes APB 25.

    The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R commencing from October 1, 2005.

    The Company has used the “modified prospective method” for recognizing the expense over the remaining vesting period for awards that were outstanding but unvested as of October 1, 2005. Under the modified prospective method, the Company has not adjusted the financial statements for periods ended on or prior to September 30, 2005. Under the modified prospective method, the adoption of SFAS No. 123R applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after September 30, 2005, as well as to the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of October 1, 2005.
    F-16


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net income per share for the year ended September 30, 2005 as if the Company’s stock-based compensation had been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates:

      
    September 30,
    2005
     
        
    Net income, as reported $13,496,548 
    Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation    
    expenses determined under the    
    fair value, net of related tax effects  (1,068,243)
         
    Pro forma net income $12,428,305 
         
    Net income per share    
    As reported - Basic $0.35 
         
    - Diluted $0.35 
         
    Pro-forma - Basic $0.32 
         
    - Diluted $0.32 

    The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table.Model. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatilities of the Company’s listed common stock in the United States and other relevant market information. The Company uses historical data to estimate share option exercises and employee departure behaviourbehavior used in the valuation model. The expected terms of share options granted is derived from the output of the option pricing model and represents the period of time that share options granted are expected to be outstanding. Since the share options once exercised will primarily trade in the U.S. capital market, the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the share option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

    (r)
    Retirement and Other Postretirement Benefits

    F-15


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    (r)

    Retirement and Other Postretirement Benefits

    Contributions to retirement schemes (which are defined contribution plans) are charged to cost of revenues, research and development costs,expenses, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses in the statement of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss) as and when the related employee service is provided.


    (s)
    Earnings per share

    (s)

    Earnings / (loss) per share

    Basic earnings / (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income / (loss) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings / (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income / (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding and dilutive potential ordinary shares during the period. In fiscal year 2007, dilutive potential ordinary shares consist

    (t)

    Use of restricted stock granted to employees and non-employee directors.

    F-17


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    (t)
    Use of Estimates

    Estimates

    The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the recoverability of the carrying amount of long-lived assets; provisions for inventories; valuation allowances for receivables; and provision for sales returns.returns; valuation of share-based compensation expense; and fair value assessment of financial guarantees. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


    (u)
    Segment Reporting

    (u)

    Segment Reporting

    The Company uses the “management approach” in determining reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for determining the Company’s reportable segments. Management, including the chief operating decision maker, reviews operating results solely by monthly revenue of Li-ion rechargeable batteries (but not by sub-product type or geographic area) and operating results of the Company and, as such, the Company has determined that the Company has one operating segment as defined by SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”.


    (v)
    Commitments and Contingencies

    , now included in ASC Topic 280.

    (v)

    Commitments and Contingencies

    Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.


    (w)
    Recently Issued Accounting Standards

    (w)

    Recently Issued Accounting Standards

    In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.168 “The FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an InterpretationAccounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 109”


    In July 2006,162.” The Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. Following this Statement, which is now included in ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”, the FASB issued FIN 48 “Accounting for Uncertaintywill not issue new standards in Income Taxes-an Interpretationthe form of Statements, FASB Statement No. 109”which clarifiesStaff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) to update the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires thatASC. Since the Company recognizes in its consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical meritslaunch of the position. The provisionsASC on July 1, 2009, only one level of FIN 48 becomeauthoritative U.S. GAAP for non-governmental entities exists, other than guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This Statement became effective for the Company on October 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle, if any, recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The management is in the process of evaluating this interpretation and therefore hasCompany’s annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009, but did not yet determined thehave a material impact that FIN 48 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

    F-16


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

    SFAS 157 “Fair Value Measurements”

    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    (w)

    Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)

    In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”, or SFAS No. 157, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value,, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, where fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. The standard does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The management is in the processadoption of evaluating theSFAS No. 157 has no material impact SFAS 157 will have on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

    F-18


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    SFAS 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”

    statements.

    In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”, or SFAS No. 159, now included in ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with a few exceptions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The requirements of SFAS No. 159 are effective forapply to the Company’s financial statements starting in its fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2008. The management is in the processadoption of evaluating this guidance and thereforeSFAS No. 159 has not yet determined theno material impact that SFAS 159 will have on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.


    SFAS 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51”

    statements.

    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51”, or SFAS No. 160, now included in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidarysubsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective forapply to the Company’s financial statements starting in its fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The managementon October 1, 2009. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is in the process of evaluating thenot expected to have a material impact SFAS 160 will have on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.


    SFAS 141(Revised) “Business Combinations”

    statements.

    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised) “Business Combinations”., or SFAS No. 141 (Revised), now included in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”, SFAS No. 141 (Revised) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141 (Revised) is required to be adopted by the Company for business acquisitions for which the acquisition date is on or after October 1, 2009.

    In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-1 “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13”, or FSP FAS No. 157-1, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. FSP FAS No. 157-1 provides a scope exception from Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) for the evaluation criteria on lease classification and capital lease measurement under SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and other related accounting pronouncements. The guidanceCompany adopted FSP FAS No. 157-1 effective October 1, 2008. Accordingly, the provisions of SFAS No. 157 will not be applied to lease transactions under SFAS No.13 except when applying SFAS No. 157 to business combinations recorded by the Company.

    F-17


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    (w)

    Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)

    In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, or FSP FAS No. 157-2, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which delays the effective date of SFAS

    No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. FSP FAS No. 157-2 will become effective for the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008.Company on October 1, 2009. The managementCompany is in the process of evaluating the impact of applying FSP FAS No. 157-2 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis. Examples of items to which the deferral would apply include, but are not limited to:

    • nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are measured at fair value in a business combination or other new basis event, except those that are remeasured at fair value in subsequent periods;

    • reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test as described in SFAS 141 (Revised) willNo. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No.142”), and nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities measured at fair value in the SFAS No. 142 goodwill impairment test, if applicable; and

    • nonfinancial liabilities for exit or disposal activities initially measured at fair value under SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“SFAS No. 146”).

    As a result of the issuance of FSP FAS No. 157-2, the Company did not apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities within the scope of FSP FAS No. 157-2 in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.

    In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, or SFAS No. 161, now included in ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. Adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.


    SAB 108 “Consideringstatements.

    In April 2008, the EffectsFASB issued FSP FAS No. 142-3 “Determination of Prior Year Misstatements when quantifying Misstatementsthe Useful Life of Intangible Assets”, or FSP FAS No. 142-3, now included in Current YearASC Topic 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”. FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement of Financial Statements”

    In September 2006,Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”). FSP FAS No. 142-3 is intended to improve the Securitiesconsistency between the useful life of an intangible asset determined under SFAS No. 142 and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”)the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 108,141(Revised) and other U.S. GAAP. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 which provides guidancemeans that it will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning on October 1, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited. Adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material impact on the processCompany’s financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of quantifying financial statement misstatements. In SABFinancial Instruments”, or FSP FAS No. 108, the SEC staff establishes an approach that requires quantification107-1 and APB No. 28-1, now included in ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments”. FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require disclosures about fair value of financial statement errors, under bothinstruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. In addition, the iron-curtain and the roll-over methods, based on the effects of the error on each of ourFSP amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial statements and the related financial statement disclosures. SAB No. 108information at interim reporting periods. The FSP is generally effective for annual financial statements in the first fiscal year endedinterim periods ending after NovemberJune 15, 2006. The transition provisions of SAB No. 108 permits existing public companies to record the cumulative effect in the first year ended2009, with earlier adoption permitted for periods ending after NovemberMarch 15, 2006 by recording correcting adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of that year with the offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings.2009. The adoption of SABFSP FAS No. 108107-1 and APB No. 28-1 have no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    F-18


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    (w)

    Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 “Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”, or FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, now included in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, for debt securities and the presentation and disclosure requirements of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2 has no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4 “Determining Whether a Market is Not Active and a Transaction Is Not Distressed”, or FSP No. 157-4, now included in ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. FSP No. 157-4 clarifies when markets are illiquid or that market pricing may not actually reflect the “real” value of an asset. If a market is determined to be inactive and market price is reflective of a distressed price then an alternative method of pricing can be used, such as a present value technique to estimate fair value. FSP No. 157-4 identifies factors to be considered when determining whether or not a market is inactive. FSP No. 157-4 would be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009 and shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of FSP No. 157-4 has no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies”, or FSP No. 141R-1, now included in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations”. FSP No. 141R-1 amends the provisions in SFAS No. 141 (Revised) for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP No. 141R-1 eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in SFAS No. 141 (Revised) and instead carries forward most of the provisions in SFAS No. 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP No. 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 141 (Revised). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP No. 141R-1 on its financial statements.

    In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events”, or SFAS No. 165, now included in ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events”, which sets forth general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No.165 is effective after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 has no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”, or SFAS No. 166, now included in ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing”. SFAS No. 166 improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on its financial statements.

    F-19



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)
    3
    Pledged Deposits

    (w)

    Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)

    In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, or SFAS No. 167, now included in ASC Topic 810, “Consolidation”, which amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) to address the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. SFAS No. 167 also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Additionally, SFAS No. 167 provides more timely and useful information about an enterprise’s involvement with a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on its financial statements.

    In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, or ASU 2009-05. ASU 2009-05 provides additional guidance for measuring the fair value of liabilities and clarifies that the quoted price for the identical liability, when traded as an asset in an active market, is a Level 1 measurement, providing there are no adjustments to the quoted price. Alternatively, when no quoted price is available, ASU 2009-05 affirms the use of other valuation techniques outlined in SFAS No. 157. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after its issuance. Adoption of ASU 2009-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) – Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, or ASU 2009-12. ASU 2009-12 amends SFAS No. 157 to permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). ASU 2009-12 also requires new disclosures, by major category of investments, about the attributes includes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the Codification. ASU 2009-12 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2009-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) – Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements”, or ASU 2009-13. AUS 2009-13 requires companies to allocate revenue in multiple-element arrangements based on an element’s estimated selling price if vendor-specific or other third party evidence of value is not available. AUS 2009-13 is to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2009-13 on its financial statements.

    In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985) – Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements”, or ASU 2009-14. ASU 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under ASU 2009-14, tangible products containing software and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in ASC Topic 985-605, “Software – Revenue Recognition”. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software component are always excluded from the software revenue guidance. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangement entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2009-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

    3

    Pledged Deposits

    Pledged deposits as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Pledged deposits with banks for bills payable $12,971,989 $4,594,727 

    4
    Trade Accounts Receivable, net

       2008  2009 
            
     Pledged deposits with banks for:      
        Construction payable$ 931,317 $ 893,603 
        Short-term bank loans -  7,137,307 
        Bills payable 3,517,927  23,084,199 
            
      $ 4,449,244 $ 31,115,109 

    Deposits pledged for construction payable are generally released when the relevant constructions are completed.

    4

    Trade Accounts Receivable, net

    Trade accounts receivable as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:


     
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Trade accounts receivable $56,197,229 $57,928,281 
    Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (1,063,285) (3,021,617)
            
       55,133,944  54,906,664 
    Bills receivable  9,198,227  8,244,208 
            
      $64,332,171 $63,150,872 

       2008  2009 
     Trade accounts receivable$ 87,974,185 $ 84,133,865 
     Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts (5,351,244) (13,081,331)
            
       82,622,941  71,052,534 
     Bills receivable 117,347  12,239,164 
            
      $ 82,740,288 $ 83,291,698 

    An analysis of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 is as follows:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Balance at beginning of year $764,362 $1,593,538 $1,063,285 
    Addition / (reversal) of          
    bad debt expense, net  796,987  (558,719) 1,852,213 
    Foreign exchange adjustment  32,189  28,466  106,119 
               
    Balance at end of year $1,593,538 $1,063,285 $3,021,617 

       2007  2008  2009 
               
     Balance at beginning of year$ 1,063,285 $ 3,021,617 $ 5,351,244 
     Addition of bad debt expense, net 1,852,213  1,943,139  7,727,643 
     Foreign exchange adjustment 106,119  386,488  2,444 
               
     Balance at end of year$ 3,021,617 $ 5,351,244 $ 13,081,331 

    F-20


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    5
    Inventories

    5

    Inventories

    Inventories as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Raw materials $20,693,915 $15,245,732 
    Work-in-progress  5,686,328  5,698,017 
    Finished goods  21,008,693  40,776,958 
            
       47,388,936  61,720,707 
    Provision for obsolete inventories  -  (1,893,475)
            
      $47,388,936 $59,827,232 

       2008  2009 
            
     Raw materials$ 16,671,505 $ 18,476,929 
     Work-in-progress        12,993,897         10,488,114 
     Finished goods        40,638,380         40,217,837 
            
              70,303,782         69,182,880 
     Provision for obsolete inventories        (2,720,722)        (3,647,496)
            
      $ 67,583,060 $ 65,535,384 

    Part of the Company’s inventories with carrying value of US$10,115,44221,999,619 and US$19,971,24121,973,836 as of September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, respectively, was pledged as collateral under certain loan agreements (see Note 11)12).


    6
    Prepayments and Other Receivables

    6

    Prepayments and Other Receivables

    Prepayments and other receivables as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:



     
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Prepayments for raw materials and others $905,933 $925,187 
    Other receivables  263,569  740,088 
    Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (34,732) (8,781)
            
      $1,134,770 $1,656,494 

    7
    Income Taxes

       2008  2009 
            
     Prepayments for raw materials and others$ 866,561 $ 1,437,115 
     Other receivables 3,605,465  3,202,149 
     Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts (9,534) (6,840)
            
      $ 4,462,492 $ 4,632,424 

    7

    Income Taxes

    United States Tax


    China BAK is subject to United States of America tax law. No provision for income taxes in the United States or elsewhere has been made as China BAK had no taxable income for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007.2009. The statutory tax rate for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 is 35%.

    Canada States Tax


    BAK Canada is subject to Canada tax law. No provision for income taxes in the Canada has been made as BAK Canada had no taxable income for the yearyears ended September 30, 2007.2007, 2008 and 2009. The statutory tax rate for the yearyears ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 is 36.1%38%.

    German States Tax

    BAK Europe is subject to Germany tax law. No provision for income taxes in German has been made as BAK Europe had no taxable income for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The statutory tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 is 25%.

    India Tax

    BAK India is subject to India tax law. No provision for income taxes in India has been made as BAK India had no taxable income for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. The statutory tax rate for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 is 30%.

    F-21


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    7

    Income Taxes (continued)

    Hong Kong Tax


    BAK International is subject to Hong Kong profits tax rate of 17.5%16.5% . Management of BAK International has determined that all income and expenses are offshore and not subject to Hong Kong profits tax. As a result, BAK International did not incur any Hong Kong profits tax during the years presented.


    F-21


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    PRC Tax


    Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics are both registered and operate in Shenzhen, the PRC, and are each recognized as “Manufacturing Enterprise Located in Special Economic Zone”. As a result, they arehave been entitled to a preferential enterprise income tax rate of 15%. In accordance with the relevant income tax laws, the profits of Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics arewere fully exempted from income tax for two years from the first profit makingprofitable calendar year of operations after offset of accumulated taxable losses, followed by a 50% exemption for the immediate next three calendar years ("(“tax holiday"holiday”).


    The tax holiday of Shenzhen BAK commenced in 2002, the first calendar year in which Shenzhen BAK had assessable profit, and ended on December 31, 2006. In addition, due to the additional capital invested incontributed by BAK International to Shenzhen BAK in both 2005 and 2006 and Shenzhen BAK’s qualification as an advanced technology enterprise in 2007 and 2008, Shenzhen BAK was granted a lowerpreferential income tax rate of 3.309%7.5%, 3.82%11.8% and 6.12%12.6% for calendar years 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively. In accordance with the transition period of the new corporate income tax law (the “New CIT Law”) and before considering the above-mentioned tax concessions, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rate for calendar years 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2005, 20062012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, Shenzhen BAK’s income tax rates after consideration of its tax concessions are expected to be 15% for both calendar years 2010 and 2007, respectively.


    2011and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%.

    BAK Electronics, is currentlyestablished in August 2005, has been eligible for the same preferential tax treatment previously applicable to Shenzhen BAK and was in the tax holiday and fully exempt from any enterprise income tax.


    tax for calendar years 2006 and 2007 followed by a three-year 50% reduction in its enterprise income tax rate. In addition, pursuant to the transition period of the New CIT Law and before considering the above-mentioned 50% reduction, BAK Electronics’ income tax rates for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011 are expected to be 20%, 22% and 24%, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. Therefore, BAK Electronics’ income tax rate after consideration of its tax holiday are expected to be 10%, 11% and 24% for calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and starting in calendar year 2012, it is expected to be subject to an income tax rate of 25%. BAK Electronics did not incur any enterprise income tax for the current year due to the current tax losses carried forward from the calendar year 2008.

    BAK Tianjin is currently exempted from anypaying no enterprise income tax due to cumulative tax losses.


    PRC’s legislative body,

    On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress adoptedof the unified Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”)PRC determined to adopt the New CIT Law. The New CIT Law on March 16, 2007. This newunifies the application scope, tax law will replace the existing separate incomerate, tax lawsdeduction and preferential policy for both domestic enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises and will becomeFIEs. The New CIT Law became effective on January 1, 2008. UnderAccording to the new tax law, a unifiedNew CIT Law, the applicable income tax rate is set at 25% for both domestic enterprisesShenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and foreign-invested enterprises. However, thereBAK Tianjin will be a25% after their preferential tax holidays and the transition period have ended. During the transition period, tax rates for enterprises, whether foreign-invested or domestic, that are currently receiving preferential tax treatments granted by relevant tax authorities. Enterprises that are subject to an enterprise income tax rate lower than 25% may continue to enjoyentities was 18% for the lower ratecalendar year 2008, and will transit into the new tax rate over a five year period beginning on the effective date of the EIT Law. Enterprises that are currently entitled to exemptions for a fixed term may continue to enjoy such treatment until the exemption term expires. Preferential tax treatments may continueis expected to be granted to industries20%, 22% and projects that qualify24% for such preferential treatments under the new law.

    (a)
    Income taxes in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income
    calendar years 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively, before the application of applicable tax holidays or other tax preferences.

    (a) Income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income / (loss)

    Income taxes consist of:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Current tax $553,650 $520,082 $414,163 
    Deferred tax  98,288  72,810  (609,684)
      $651,938 $592,892 $(195,521)

       2007  2008  2009 
     Current tax$ 414,163 $ 107,166 $ 771,632 
     Deferred tax (609,684) (1,152,379) (2,024,214)
               
     Income tax benefit$ (195,521)$ (1,045,213)$ (1,252,582)

    Substantially all of the Group’sCompany’s income / (loss) before income taxes and related tax expenses / (benefit)benefit are from PRC sources. Actual income tax expenses / (benefit)benefit reported in the consolidated statements of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss) differ from the amounts computed by applying the US statutory income tax rate of 35% to income / (loss) before income taxes for the three years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 for the following reasons:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Income before income taxes $14,148,486 $20,757,458 $287,807 
               
    Computed “expected” income          
    tax expense at 35%  4,951,970  7,265,110  100,732 
    Change in the balance of the valuation          
    allowance for deferred tax assets  -  1,072,296  691,540 
    Foreign tax rate differential  (2,742,422) (4,765,560) (730,303)
    Non-taxable income  (40,630) (184,713) (624,936)
    Non-deductible expenses          
    - Share-based compensation  -  630,759  867,746 
    - Other non-deductible expenses  121,686  51,772  361,189 
    Tax holiday  (1,638,666) (3,476,772) (861,489)
               
     $651,938 $592,892 $(195,521)

    F-22


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    7

    Income Taxes (continued)

       2007  2008  2009 
               
     Income / (loss) before income taxes$ 287,807 $ (8,985,813)$ (15,244,075)
               
     Computed “expected” income tax expense at 35% 100,732  (3,145,034) (5,335,426)
     Change in the balance of the valuation allowance for deferred tax 691,540  464,569  802,066 
     Deferred tax due to the enacted tax rate change -  (697,928) - 
     Loss of tax credit due to change of tax law -  224,804  - 
     Foreign tax rate differential (730,303) (204,968) (147,896)
     Non-taxable income (624,936) (800,440) (1,070,181)
     Non-deductible expenses         
        - Share-based compensation 867,746  1,323,026  1,303,715 
        - Other non-deductible expenses 361,189  1,984,161  3,053,752 
     Under-provision in previous year -  -  244,417 
     Preferential tax rate and tax holiday (861,489) (193,403) (103,029)
               
     Actual income tax benefit$ (195,521)$ (1,045,213)$ (1,252,582)

    Shenzhen BAK and BAK Electronics received in aggregate tax benefit of US$861,489, US$193,403 and US$103,029, or US$0.02, US$0.04 and US$0.007 per basic share pursuant to their tax holiday and preferential tax rate for the three years ended September 30, 2007, (continued)

    2008 and 2009 respectively.

    The significant components of deferred income tax expensebenefits for the three years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 are as follows:

       2007  2008  2009 
     Deferred tax income$ (1,299,227)$ (1,616,948)$ (2,826,280)
     Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets 689,543  464,569  802,066 
               
      $ (609,684)$ (1,152,379)$ (2,024,214)

    F-23


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
    Deferred tax expenses / (income) $98,288 $(999,486)$(1,299,227)
    Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets  -  1,072,296  689,543 
               
      $98,288 $72,810 $(609,684)
    (b)
    Deferred taxation
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    7

    Income Taxes (continued)

    (b) Deferred taxation

    The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 are presented below:


     
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Deferred tax assets
         
          
    Trade accounts receivable $20,779 $123,673 
    Inventories  7,168  76,675 
    Accrued expenses and other payables  50,841  90,132 
    Intangible assets  -  171,774 
    Property, plant and equipment  6,810  - 
    Tax credit carried forward  -  212,436 
    Net operating loss carried forward  1,072,296  1,761,839 
            
    Total gross deferred tax assets  1,157,894  2,436,529 
    Less: valuation allowance  (1,072,296) (1,761,839)
            
    Net deferred tax assets $85,598 $674,690 
            
    Deferred tax liabilities
           
            
    Property, plant and equipment $304,957 $279,597 
            
    Net deferred tax liabilities $304,957 $279,597 

       2008  2009 
     Deferred tax assets      
            
        Short-term      
              Trade accounts receivable$ 973,311 $ 2,862,981 
              Inventories 461,097  627,422 
              Accrued expenses and other payables 285,254  404,300 
            
        Short-term deferred tax assets 1,719,662  3,894,703 
            
        Long-term      
              Property, plant and equipment 6,543  42,911 
              Net operating loss carried forward 581,525  1,383,591 
              Valuation allowance (581,525) (1,383,591)
            
        Long-term deferred tax assets 6,543  42,911 
            
     Total net deferred tax assets$ 1,726,205 $ 3,937,614 
            
     Deferred tax assets / (liabilities):      
            
        Long-term      
              Intangible assets$ 294,680 $ 147,686 
              Property, plant and equipment (386,080) (425,913)
            
        Long-term deferred tax liabilities$ (91,400)$ (278,227)
            
     Net deferred tax assets$ 1,634,805 $ 3,659,387 

    In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible or are utilized. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon an assessment of the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are tested whether they are deductible or can be utilized, management believes that the deferred tax assets as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 are more likely than not to be realized, except for the deferred tax assets relating to the net operating loss carried forward incurred by the Company itself.

    and its subsidiaries.

    In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset of US$1,761,83935,803 arising from the net operating loss carried forward of approximately US$5,034,000102,293 incurred by the Company itself, the Company will need to generate sufficient future taxable income to cover the above net operating loss carried forward before its expiration in fiscal year 2026 through 2027. As the Company is a non-operating holding company and currently does not expect those unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries to reverse and become taxable to the Company, it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of its net operating loss carried forward. Therefore, full valuation allowance of US$1,761,83935,803 was provided for the deferred tax assets in this respect.

    F-24


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    7

    Income Taxes (continued)

    (b) Deferred taxation (continued)

    In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset of US$172,307 arising from the net operating loss carried forward of US$1,723,072 incurred by BAK Electronics, BAK Electronics will need to generate sufficient future taxable income to cover the above net operating loss carried forward before its expiration in fiscal year 2013 through 2014.

    In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset of US$1,175,481 arising from the net operating loss carried forward of US$4,701,925 incurred by BAK Tianjin, BAK Tianjin will need to generate sufficient future taxable income to cover the above net operating loss carried forward before its expiration in fiscal year 2012 through 2014.

    The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if future taxable income decreases.

    F-23

    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability for the undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries of approximately US$52,733,52259,897,132 and US$37,567,665 as of September 30, 20072008 and 2009 because the Company currently does not expect those unremitted earnings to reverse and become taxable to the Company in the foreseeable future. A deferred tax liability will be recognized when the Company no longer plans to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings. Calculation of related unrecognized deferred tax liability is not practicable.


    8
    Property, Plant and Equipment, net

    8

    Assets Held for Sale

    In fiscal year 2009, the Company decided to dispose of its machinery and equipment relating to steel-case cell production line. The Company expects that the final sale and disposal of the assets will be completed in the fiscal year 2010. In connection with the disposal, the Company determined that the carrying value of the assets that are held for sale is separately presented in the consolidated balance sheets in the caption “Assets held for sale”, and these assets are no longer depreciated.

    9

    Property, Plant and Equipment, net

    Property, plant and equipment as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:

       2008  2009 
     Buildings$ 94,062,610 $ 100,280,425 
     Machinery and equipment 89,999,435  123,796,485 
     Office equipment 1,590,015  1,802,825 
     Motor vehicles 1,083,278  1,168,575 
            
       186,735,338  227,048,310 
     Accumulated depreciation (33,033,996) (42,709,026)
     Construction in progress 36,116,818  27,959,855 
     Prepayment for acquisition of property, plant and equipment 5,617,052  7,385,855 
            
      $ 195,435,212 $ 219,684,994 

    (i) Depreciation expense is included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income / (loss) as follows:

       2007  2008  2009 
     Cost of revenues$ 6,274,424 $ 9,757,827 $ 9,291,825 
     Research and development expenses 296,199  468,556  479,980 
     Sales and marketing expenses 591,583  636,301  444,060 
     General and administrative expenses 1,455,911  1,652,456  1,896,383 
               
      $8,618,117 $12,515,140 $ 12,112,248 

    Property, plant and equipment with net book value of US$575,240 was sold in the current year for US$568,706, of which US$557,990 was included in prepayments and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets.

    F-25


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

      
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Buildings $63,508,910 $70,380,985 
    Machinery and equipment  30,658,968  59,405,092 
    Office equipment  750,115  1,088,032 
    Motor vehicles  1,018,042  1,135,616 
       95,936,035  132,009,725 
    Accumulated depreciation  (9,925,557) (19,301,165)
    Construction in progress  23,395,638  12,578,715 
    Prepayment for acquisition of property, plant and equipment  -  19,835,747 
      $109,406,116 $145,123,022 
    (i)
    Depreciation expense is included inNotes to the consolidated financial statements of income and comprehensive income as follows:
      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Cost of revenues $2,906,335 $4,468,704 $6,274,424 
    Research and development costs  78,581  259,721  296,199 
    Sales and marketing expenses  416,701  539,412  591,583 
    General and administrative expenses  106,636  466,861  1,455,911 
      $3,508,253 $5,734,698 $8,618,117 
    (ii)
    Construction in Progress

    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    9

    Property, Plant and Equipment, net (continued)

    (ii) Construction in Progress

    Construction in progress mainly comprises capital expenditures for construction of the Company’s new corporate campus, including offices, factories and staff dormitories.

    For the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007,2009, the Company capitalized interest of approximately US$1,088,000,451,226, US$460,486300,805 and US$451,226,723,527, respectively, to the cost of construction in progress.

    (iii)
    Pledged Property, Plant and Equipment

    (iii) Pledged Property, Plant and Equipment

    As of September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, machinery and equipment with net book value of US$6,253,30242,582,851 and US$34,090,26767,873,955 of the Company were pledged as collateral under certain loan arrangements (see Notes 1112 and 12)13).

    F-24


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    9
    Lease Prepayments, net

    10

    Lease Prepayments, net

    Lease prepayments as of September 30, 20062008 and 2007 consist2009 consisted of the following:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Lease prepayments $3,322,042 $18,335,267 
    Accumulated amortization  (160,565) (450,831)
      $3,161,477 $17,884,436 

       2008  2009 
     Lease prepayments$ 33,009,123 $ 34,048,996 
     Accumulated amortization (1,226,994) (1,883,367)
            
     $ 31,782,129 $ 32,165,629 

    During the year ended September 30, 2007, the Company acquired and fully paid the lease prepayment of US$717,344 in relation to the right to use the land in Shenzhen for the Company’srelating to its new Research and Development Test Centre. The Company obtained the related property ownership and land use rights certificate already.during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The Company also acquired and fully paid the lease prepayment of US$14,119,888 for the right to use the land inrelating to its Tianjin andfacility. As of September 30, 2008, the application forCompany had obtained related land use rights certificate was in process.of the land relating to the Tianjin facility, but the Tianjin government had requested that the Company complete the construction of the facility on the land before September 30, 2008, which the Company had not done. As of September 30, 2007,2009, the Company was in the processcourse of evaluatingnegotiating with the development plansrelevant government bureau for these two plotsan extension of land.


    Leasethe completion date.

    The lease prepayment with a cost of US$3,498,035 represents the right to use the land on which the Company’s corporate campus had been constructed and is owned by the PRC government. According to the agreement with the local government of Kuichong Township of Longgang District of Shenzhen, the Company is obligated to pay approximately US$13.613.60 per square meter to the local government to obtain the right to use the land for a period of 50 years. According to thea preliminary measurement conducted in 2004, total consideration payable by the Company in respect of the land use rights amounted to US$4,029,038, which was reduced to US$3,246,791 in accordance with the results of the final measurement by the local government in 2005. The balance of US$528,976 iswas still outstanding as of September 30, 2007. The local government granted permission to the Company to commence the construction of thea new production plant. On June 20, 2007, the Company obtained the approvals for project planning and construction from the government of Shenzhen.


    Under the agreement with the local government of Shenzhen for the acquisition of land use rights for BAK Industrial Park entered into on June 29, 2007, the Company was required to pay an additional US$11,819,841 to acquire the land for BAK Industrial Park. Additionally, according to a notice received from the local government of Shenzhen on June 6, 2008, the Company obtained government grants totaling US$7,889,991 to subsidize such additional cost of the land use rights. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had fully paid the remaining cost of US$3,929,850 and had obtained the land use rights certificate. On July 3, 2009, the Company had obtained the approval for project-planning and construction from the local government of Shenzhen. As of September 30, 2009, the application for the related property ownership certificate was in process.

    Amortization expenses for the above lease prepayments were approximately US$66,000,274,000, US$69,000702,000 and US$274,000657,000 for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is approximately US$367,000682,000 each year.

    year, respectively.

    The Company has committed to pledge its property ownership and land use rights certificate relating to the Company’s Research and Development Test Centre (Note 13) to China Development Bank. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in the process of negotiating with the relevant government for the requisite approval. The aggregate net book value of the related land use rights as of September 30, 2008 and 2009 were US$769,261 and US$1,232,651.

    F-26


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    10
    Intangible Assets, net
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    11

    Intangible Assets, net

    Intangible assets as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Trademarks, computer software and technology $99,657 $165,826 
    Less: Accumulated amortization  (24,975) (44,788)
      $74,682 $121,038 

       2008  2009 
     Trademarks, computer software and technology$ 244,314 $ 385,593 
     Less: Accumulated amortization (82,896) (146,106)
            
      $ 161,418 $ 239,487 

    Intangible assets represent the trademarks, computer software and technology used for battery production.


    production and research.

    Amortization expenses for these intangible assets were approximately US$7,000,19,000, US$12,00033,000 and US$19,00063,000 for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is approximately US$24,00070,000 each year.

    F-25


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    11
    Short-term Bank Loans

    12

    Short-term Bank Loans

    The Company obtained several short-term loan facilities from financial institutions in the PRC. These facilities were secured by the Company’s assets with the following carrying values:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Inventories (Note 5) $10,115,442 $19,971,241 
    Machinery and equipment, net (Note 8)  6,253,302  18,299,368 
      $16,368,744 $38,270,609 

       2008  2009 
     Pledged deposits (Note 3)$ - $ 7,137,307 
     Inventories (Note 5) 21,999,619  21,973,836 
     Machinery and equipment, net (Note 9) 14,058,213  33,174,263 
            
     $ 36,057,832 $ 62,285,406 

    As of September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, the Company had several short-term bank loans with aggregate outstanding balances of US$67,899,908105,598,170 and US$89,870,586139,159,380, respectively. The loans were primarily obtained for general working capital, carried interest rates ranging from 5.508%0.30% to 7.722%5.58% per annum, and had maturity dates ranging from 6 to 12 months. Each loan is guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li, who did not receive any compensation for acting as guarantor.


    The

    As of September 30, 2009, the Company also committed to pledgehad pledged the property ownership and land use rights certificate to be obtained in relation to the land on which the Company’sShenzhen BAK’s corporate campus had been constructed for short-term bank loans amounting to US$23,965,49058,596,897 borrowed from Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China. TheAs of September 30, 2009, the aggregate net book value of the buildings and land use rightrights in relation to the property ownership and land use rights certificate as of September 30, 2007 was US$81,150,903.


    The Company is subject to certain covenants, which require the Company to comply with certain financial ratio, for its loan facilities which are tested on a monthly basis. If the Company fails to meet the requirements, the outstanding bank loans, including interest and penalties due thereunder, will accelerate and become immediately due and payable.
    F-26


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    104,461,858.

    13

    Long-term Bank Loans

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062008 and 2007 (continued)

    12
    Long-term Bank Loans

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, the Company had long-term bank loans of US$29,291,154. The amount64,532,214 and US$55,667,052 respectively. As of September 30, 2009, US$13,314,16110,254,457 was borrowed under a four-year long-term loan credit facility from China Development Bank, bearing interest at the benchmark rate of the PBOCPeople’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) for three-year to five-year long-term loans, which is currently 6.48%5.76% per annum. TheThis long-term bank loan is repayable in three instalmentstwo installments of US$3,994,248 on November 20, 2008, US$3,994,2484,394,767 on November 20, 2009 and US$5,325,6655,859,690 on December 26, 2010.

    The

    Three other twolong-term loans withtotaled an aggregate borrowed amount of US$15,976,99321,973,835 as of September 30, 2009. These loans were borrowed under a five-year long-term loan credit facility from Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China, and carry interest at 90% of the benchmark rate of the PBOC for three-year to five-year long-term loans. The first loan of US$5,325,6645,859,689 currently carries interest at 5.832%5.184% per annum and is repayable on January 25, 2012. The othersecond loan of US$10,651,329 with current11,719,379 currently carries annual interest rate of 6.237%5.184% and is repayable in three instalmentsinstallments of US$2,662,8322,929,845 on January 25, 2010, US$6,657,0807,324,612 on January 25, 2011 and US$1,331,4171,464,922 on January 25, 2012, respectively.

    The third loan of US$4,394,767 currently carries annual interest of 5.76% and is repayable on January 25, 2010.

    Another loan of US$23,438,760 as of September 30, 2009 was borrowed under a four-year long-term loan credit facility from Tianjin Branch, Agricultural Bank of China and carries interest at the benchmark rate of the PBOC for three-year to five-year long-term loans, which is currently 5.76% per annum. This loan is repayable in four installments of US$4,394,767 on December 26, 2009, US$4,394,767 on December 26, 2010, US$7,324,613 on December 26, 2011, and US$7,324,613 on May 26, 2012.

    F-27


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    13

    Long-term Bank Loans (continued)

    The long-term bank loan with China Development Bank is: (i) guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li; (ii) secured by certain shares of the Company owned by Mr. Xiangqian Li; and (iii) to be secured by the property ownership and land use rights certificate ofrelating to the land on which the Company’s Research and Development Test Centre is to be constructed and the future facilities to be constructed thereon.


    As of September 30, 2009, the Company had obtained the relevant land use rights certificate and was in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the requisite approval to pledge it as described.

    The long-term bank loan with Shenzhen Branch, Agricultural Bank of China is: (i) guaranteed by Mr. Xiangqian Li; (ii) secured by the Company’s machinery and equipment with carrying values of US$15,790,89928,524,638 and US$34,699,692 as of September 30, 2007 (Note 8)2008 and 2009 (see Note 9); and (iii) secured by the property ownership certificate and land use rights certificate to be obtained in relation to the land on which the Company’sShenzhen BAK’s corporate campus had been constructed and the futureany machinery and equipment to be purchased and used in the campus.


    campus subsequent to such construction.

    The long-term bank loan with Tianjin Branch, Agricultural Bank of China is secured by the machinery and equipment purchased for the automated high-power lithium-phosphate cells production line in Tianjin. As of September 30, 2009, construction of the automated high-power lithium-phosphate cells production line was in progress.

    Mr. Xiangqian Li did not receive any compensation for pledging his shares in the Company to the bank andor acting as guarantor for the above long-term bank loans.


    13
    Accrued Expenses and Other Payables

    The aggregate maturities of long-term bank loans as of September 30, 2009 are as follows:

     Fiscal years ending on September 30,   
                    2010$ 16,114,146 
                    2011 17,579,070 
                    2012 21,973,836 
         
      $ 55,667,052 

    14

    Accrued Expenses and Other Payables

    Accrued expenses and other payables as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 consist of the following:

       2008  2009 
     Construction costs payable$ 1,995,060 $ 3,068,008 
     Equipment purchases payable 9,310,546  6,938,873 
     Customer deposits (Note 14(a)) 1,916,412  2,343,334 
     Other payables and accruals (Note 14(b)) 7,859,769  5,576,246 
     Staff and workers’ welfare and bonus fund 499,395  498,810 
            
      $ 21,581,182 $ 18,425,271 



     
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Land use rights payable $3,031,223 $528,976 
    Construction costs payable  9,815,947  3,062,469 
    Equipment purchases payable  6,243,100  4,682,908 
    Customer deposits (Note 13(a))  342,579  1,647,489 
    Other payables and accruals (Note 13(b))  5,568,961  4,896,538 
    Staff and workers’ welfare and       
    bonus fund  879,175  648,812 
      $25,880,985 $15,467,192 

    (a)

    Customer deposits were received from customers in connection with orders of products to be delivered in future periods.

    (b)

    Other payables and accruals included deferred income from receipts of government grants amounting to US$777,625637,989 and US$579,166673,864 as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 respectively.

    Other payables and accruals as of September 30, 2008 and 2009 also included payable for liquidated damage of US$1,210,213 and US$1,208,795 respectively (Note 16).

    Other payables and accruals as

    15

    Deferred Revenue

    Deferred revenue represents a government grant of September 30, 2006 and 2007 also include payablesubsidy for liquidated damageadditional cost of US$290,575 and US$1,051,000 respectively (Note 14).

    F-27
    land use rights relating to BAK Industrial Park, which is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable facilities constructed thereon of 35 years.

    F-28



    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)
    14
    Shareholders’ Equity

    On January 20, 2005, the Company completed a share swap transaction with the shareholders of BAK International, as more fully described in Note 1. Prior to and in connection with the completion of the share swap transaction with BAK International, China BAK sold 8,600,433 shares of its ordinary shares to new investors in a private placement, as more fully described in Note 1.

    16

    Shareholders’ Equity

    On September 16, 2005, the Company sold 7,899,863 shares of its common stock to new investors for US$43,449,247. The Company granted certain registration rights to such purchasers, including a covenant to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement covering their shares. Pursuant to the terms of the registration rights agreement, among other things, (a) if a registration statement filed pursuant thereto ceases to be effective after its effective date to cover the resale of the shares for more than 30 trading days or (b) if for any reason the Company is required to file an additional registration statement covering such shares, and it does not file such additional registration statement within 45 days after the time it first knew, or reasonably should have known, that such registration statement would be required to be filed, then, while the relevant shares could not be put back to the Company, it would be liable to pay partial liquidated damages to those selling shareholders equal to 1.0% of the aggregate investment amount paid by those selling shareholders for the shares, and on each monthly anniversary thereafter, unless the event is cured by such date, an additional 1.5% on (except with respect to the first such event) a daily pro-rata basis. The Company also issued warrants to purchase 631,989 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of US$7.92 per share, being 110% of the share price as of the grant date, exercisable for three years after the date of issuance, as a fee to its financial advisors and other external parties in connection with this transaction. The grant date fair value of the warrants amounted to US$1,630,532 and has been recorded within additional paid-in-capital as a cost of the offering, and therefore, the issuance of the share warrants does not have any impact on the net income.


    On August 15, 2006, the SEC declared effective a post-effective amendment that the Company had filed on August 4, 2006, terminating the effectiveness of a resale registration statement on Form SB-2 that had been filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement with certain shareholders to register the resale of shares held by those shareholders. The Company subsequently filed Form S-1 for these shareholders. On December 8, 2006, the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 (the “2006 Form 10-K”). After the filing of the 2006 Form 10-K, the Company’s previously filed registration statement on Form S-1 was no longer available for resales by the selling shareholders whose shares were included in such Form S-1. Under the registration rights agreement, those selling shareholders became eligible for liquidated damages relating to the above two events totallingtotaling approximately US$1,051,000 from the Company. The Company therefore recognized in general and administrative expenses an amount of approximately US$760,000 as liquidated damages for the year ended September 30, 2007.

    F-28
    As of September 30, 2009, no liquidated damages relating to both events have been paid.

    On November 9, 2007, the Company completed a private placement for the gross proceeds to the Company of US$13,650,000 by selling 3,500,000 shares of common stock at the price of $3.90 per share. Roth Capital Partners, LLC acted as the Company's exclusive financial advisor and placement agent in connection with the private placement and received a cash fee of US$819,000. The Company may have become liable for liquidated damages to certain shareholders whose shares were included in a resale registration statement on Form S-3 that the Company filed pursuant to a registration rights agreement that the Company entered into with such shareholders in November 2007. Under the registration rights agreement, among other things, if a registration statement filed pursuant thereto was not declared effective by the SEC by the 100th calendar day after the closing of the Company’s private placement on November 9, 2007, or the “Effectiveness Deadline”, then the Company would be liable to pay partial liquidated damages to each such investor of (a) 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such investor for the shares it purchased on the one month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline; (b) an additional 1.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such investor every thirtieth day thereafter (pro rated for periods totaling less than thirty days) until the earliest of the effectiveness of the registration statement, the ten-month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline and the time that the Company are no longer required to keep such resale registration statement effective because either such shareholders have sold all of their shares or such shareholders may sell their shares pursuant to Rule 144 without volume limitations; and (c) 0.5% of the aggregate purchase price paid by such investor for the shares it purchased in our November 2007 private placement on each of the following dates: the ten-month anniversary of the Effectiveness Deadline and every thirtieth day thereafter (pro rated for periods totaling less than thirty days), until the earlier of the effectiveness of the registration statement and the time that the Company no longer is required to keep such resale registration statement effective because either such shareholders have sold all of their shares or such shareholders may sell their shares pursuant to Rule 144 without volume limitations. Such liquidated damages would bear interest at the rate of 1% per month (prorated for partial months) until paid in full.

    On December 21, 2007, pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 7, 2008. As a result, the Company estimated liquidated damages amounting to US$561,174 for the November 2007 registration rights agreement. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had settled the liquidated damages with all the investors and the remaining provision of approximately $159,000 was included in other payables and accruals (note 14(b)).

    F-29


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)
    15
    Net Income per Share

    16

    Shareholders’ Equity (continued)

    On August 26, 2008, the Company completed a registered direct offering in the amount of 4,102,564 units at a price of $3.90 for gross proceeds to the Company of $16,000,000. Each unit is comprised of one common share and one share purchase warrant of the Company. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase an additional common share of the Company for a period of 60 days beginning on the date of the initial issuance of warrants on August 26, 2008 at an exercise price of $3.90 per share. Brean Murray, Carret & Co., LLC, acted as the Company's exclusive investment banker and agent in connection with the registered direct offering and received a cash fee of US$800,000, representing 5% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of the Shares and warrants. Pursuant to an amendment to the placement agency agreement, the Company also agreed to pay Brean Murray, Carret & Co., LLC an aggregate commission equal to 5% of the gross exercise price of received from investors for the exercise of the warrants in the offering. The placement agent had no obligation to buy any of the shares from the Company. As of September 30, 2009, 4,102,564 shares had been issued and no warrants had been exercised.

    17

    Net Income / (Loss) per Share

    The calculation of basic net incomeloss per share is based on the net loss for the year ended September 30, 2009 attributable to equity shareholders of US$13,991,493 (Net income for the year ended September 30, 2007 attributable to equity shareholders of2007: US$483,328 (2005:and net loss for the year ended September 30, 2008: US$13,496,548; 2006: US$20,164,566)7,940,600) and the weighted average number of ordinary shares of 48,979,115 in issue56,964,129 outstanding during the year (2005: 38,288,874; 2006: 48,879,608)ended September 30, 2009 (2007: 48,979,115 shares and 2008: 52,313,768 shares).


    The effects of 3,110,000 shares of stock options and 11,250 shares of restricted stock outstanding during the year ended or as of September 30, 2008 were all anti-dilutive and the effects of 4,883,700 shares of stock options, 511,250 shares of restricted stock and 4,102,564 warrants outstanding during the year ended or as of September 30, 2009 were all anti-dilutive. As such, basic and diluted net loss per share for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 are the same.

    The calculation of diluted net income per share is based on the net income for the year ended September 30, 2007 is based on the net income attributable to equity shareholders of US$483,328 (2005: US$13,496,548; 2006: US$20,164,566) and the weighted average number of ordinary shares of 49,442,285 in issue during the year ended September 30, 2007 (2005: 38,408,625; 2006: 48,912,963) after adjusting for the number of 463,170 dilutive potential ordinary shares. Restricted stock granted to employees and to non-employee directors are included in the computation of diluted net income per share for the year ended September 30, 2007. The number of 631,989 (2006: 631,989) share warrants granted to external financial advisors and 1,818,500 (2006: 1,400,000) stock options granted to employees are excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share as the warrantwarrants and stock options were both anti-dilutive. There were no shares with anti-dilutive effect for the year ended September 30, 2005.


    16
    Finance Costs, net

    18

    Finance Costs, net

    Details of finance costs are summarized as follows:

       2007  2008  2009 
     Total interest cost incurred$ 5,404,305 $ 10,007,094 $ 9,769,680 
     Less: Interest capitalized (451,226) (300,805) (723,527)
     Interest income (283,264) (87,949) (300,895)
     Bank charges 186,715  779,054  441,603 
     Exchange loss 368,270  623,414  169,122 
               
      $ 5,224,800 $ 11,020,808 $ 9,355,983 

    F-30


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Total interest cost incurred $1,930,054 $2,750,102 $5,404,305 
    Less: Interest capitalized  (1,087,909) (460,486) (451,226)
    Interest income  (60,624) (523,135) (283,264)
    Bank charges  63,806  121,510  186,715 
    Exchange loss  -  322  368,270 
      $845,327 $1,888,313 $5,224,800 
    17
    Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    19

    Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

    Pursuant to the relevant PRC regulations, the Company is required to make contributions at a rate of 8% to 11% of employees’ salaries and wages to a defined contribution retirement scheme organized by a state-sponsored social insurance plan in respect of the retirement benefits for the Company’s employees in the PRC. The total amount of contributions charged to expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of incomeoperations and comprehensive income / (loss) are presented as follows:

      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Cost of revenues $421,975 $844,182 $279,191 
    Research and development costs  12,705  42,456  57,575 
    Sales and marketing expenses  144,977  115,557  142,739 
    General and administrative expenses  115,020  107,076  160,627 
      $694,677 $1,109,271 $640,132 

       2007  2008  2009 
     Cost of revenues$ 279,191 $ 717,353 $ 608,260 
     Research and development expenses 57,575  85,227  135,443 
     Sales and marketing expenses 142,739  86,551  91,284 
     General and administrative expenses 160,627  200,315  316,311 
               
      $ 640,132 $ 1,089,446 $ 1,151,298 

    The Company has no other obligation to make payments in respect of retirement benefits of the employees. The state-sponsored retirement plan is responsible for the entire pension obligations payable to all employees.

    F-29


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    18
    Share-based Compensation

    20

    Share-based Compensation

    The Company grants share options to officers and employees and restricted ordinary shares to its non-employee directors to rewardas rewards for their services.


    Stock Option Plan

    In May 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the China BAK Battery, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The exercise price of the options granted, pursuant to the Plan, must be at least equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant. The Plan will terminate on May 16, 2055.


    On July 28, 2008, the Company’s stockholders approved certain amendments to the Plan, including increasing the total number of shares available for issuance under the Plan to 8,000,000.

    Pursuant to the Plan, the Company issued 2,000,000 options with an exercise price of US$6.25 per share on May 16, 2005. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will becomebecame vested and exercisable under the following schedule:


    Numbers of Share 
    Percentage of
    Options Issued
     
    Initial
    Vesting Date
    800,000 40% July 1, 2007
    600,000 30% January 1, 2008
    600,000 30% July 1, 2008
    2,000,000 100%  
    F-30


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

       Percentage of Initial
     Numbers of Share Options Issued Vesting Date
     800,000 40% July 1, 2007
     600,000 30% January 1, 2008
     600,000  30% July 1, 2008
     2,000,000 100%  

    Subsequent to the grant date, options to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock were forfeited because the optionees terminated their employment with the Company. In addition, on September 28, 2006, options to purchase a total of 1,400,000 shares of common stock were cancelled pursuant to the Termination and Release Agreements signed on that day. Details of the cancellation of stock options and the relevant replacement awards are set out below under “Employee Restricted Stock Awards.”

    Awards”.

    F-31


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 20072009 is presented below:

             Weighted    
          Weighted  average    
          average  remaining  Aggregate 
       Number of  exercise price  contractual  intrinsic 
       shares  per share  term  value (1)
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 200,000 $ 6.25       
     Exercised -  -       
     Forfeited -  -       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 200,000 $ 6.25         1.6 years $ - 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 200,000 $ 6.25         1.6 years $ - 


      Number of shares Weighted average exercise price per share Weighted average remaining contractual term 
    Aggregate
    Intrinsic
    Value (1)
     
    Outstanding as of October 1, 2006  400,000 $6.25       
    Granted  -  -       
    Exercised  -  -       
    Forfeited  -  -       
    Cancelled  -  -       
                  
    Outstanding as of September 30, 2007  400,000 $6.25  4 years $612,000 
                  
    Exercisable as of September 30, 2007  280,000 $6.25  4 years $428,400 

    (1)Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 20072009 (US$7.78)4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2005 was US$3.67 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$2,625,269588,716 and US$588,71673,935 for the years ended September 30, 20062007 and 2007 respectively2008 in respect of these share options granted in 2005. The expense of 2007 was allocated to general and administrative expenses and research and development costsexpenses respectively and that of 20062008 was allocated to cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development costs respectively.


    expenses. No non-cash share-based compensation expense was recognized in respect of these share options for the year ended September 30, 2009.

    The fair value of the above option awards was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model together with the following assumptions.

    Expected volatility 59.85%59.85%
    Expected dividends Nil 
    Expected life 6 years 
    Risk-free interest rate 4.13%4.13
    %

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, there were no unrecognized compensation costs of approximately US$74,000 related to non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 years.

    F-31


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    Pursuant to the Plan, the Company also issued 1,501,500 options with a weighted-averageweighted average exercise price of US$3.28 per share on June 25, 2007. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable during the period from June 30, 2007 to February 9, 2012 according to each employee’s respective agreement.

    F-32


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of the employee’s agreement respectively.


    September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 20072009 is presented below:

          Weighted  Weighted average    
       Number of  average exercise  remaining  Aggregate intrinsic 
          shares  price per share  contractual term  value (1)
                  
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 1,300,000 $ 3.29       
     Exercised 46,000  3.27       
     Forfeited 183,500  3.27       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 1,070,500 $ 3.29  3.7 years $ 1,777,030 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 730,500 $ 3.29  3.2 years $ 1,212,630 


      
    Number of Shares
     
    Weighted average exercise price per share
     
    Weighted average remaining contractual term
     
    Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
     
              
    Outstanding as of October 1, 2006
      
    -
     
    $
    -
           
    Granted on June 25, 2007
      
    1,501,500
      
    3.28
           
    Exercised
      
    -
      
    -
           
    Forfeited
      
    83,000
      
    3.27
           
    Cancelled
      
    -
      
    -
           
                  
    Outstanding as of September 30, 2007
      
    1,418,500
     
    $
    3.28
      
    6 years
     
    $
    6,383,250
     
                  
    Exercisable as of September 30, 2007
      
    20,000
     
    $
    3.35
      
    5 years
     
    $
    88,600
     

    (1)Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 20072009 (US$7.78)4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted-averageweighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2007 was US$2.15 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$545,749, US$1,580,205 and US$660,821 for the yearyears ended September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 in respect of share options granted in June 2007, which was allocated to cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development costsexpenses respectively.


    The fair value of the above option awards granted on June 25, 2007 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses following assumptions.

    Expected volatility 69.44%69.44%
    Expected dividends Nil 
    Expected life 4 - 10 years 
    Risk-free interest rate 5.09%5.09%

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, there were unrecognized compensation costs of US$2,511,849270,823 related to the above non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.


    1.4 year.

    Pursuant to the Plan, the Company also issued 360,000 options with an exercise price of US$4.30 per share on January 28, 2008. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable during the period from April 28, 2008 to January 28, 2011 according to each employee’s respective agreement.

    F-33


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:

             Weighted    
          Weighted  average    
          average  remaining  Aggregate 
       Number of  exercise price  contractual  intrinsic 
       shares  per share  term  value (1)
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 360,000 $ 4.30       
     Exercised -  -       
     Forfeited -  -       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 360,000 $ 4.30         3.3 years $ 234,000 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 180,000 $ 4.30         3.3 years��$ 117,000 

    (1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2009 (US$4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted on January 28, 2008 was US$3.59 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$681,363 and US$436,965 for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 respectively in respect of share options granted on January 28, 2008, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses respectively.

    The fair value of the above option awards granted on January 28, 2008 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses the following assumptions.

    Expected volatility120.23%
    Expected dividendsNil
    Expected life5 years
    Risk-free interest rate3.59%

    As of September 30, 2009, there were unrecognized compensation costs of US$175,504 related to the above non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.6 year.

    On May 29, 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors recommended and approved the grant of options to purchase 1,080,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Xiangqian Li and options to purchase 170,000 shares to five other employees, with an exercise price of US$4.18 per share. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable during the period from September 30, 2008 to May 29, 2012 according to each employee’s respective agreement.

    F-34


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:

             Weighted    
          Weighted  average    
          average  remaining  Aggregate 
       Number of  exercise price  contractual  intrinsic 
          shares  per share  term  value (1)
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 1,250,000 $ 4.18       
     Exercised -  -       
     Forfeited -  -       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 1,250,000 $ 4.18         3.6 years $ 962,500 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 492,500 $ 4.18         3.6 years $ 379,225 

    (1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2009 (US$4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted on May 29, 2008 was US$2.36 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$840,789 and US$1,358,988 for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 respectively in respect of share options granted on May 29, 2008, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses respectively.

    The fair value of the above option awards granted on May 29, 2008 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses the following assumptions.

    Expected volatility59.48%
    Expected dividendsNil
    Expected life5 years
    Risk-free interest rate4.01%

    As of September 30, 2009, there were unrecognized compensation costs of US$746,571 related to the above non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 year.

    On June 22, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors recommended and approved the grant of options to purchase 1,928,200 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain key employees, officers and consultants with an exercise price of US$2.81 per share. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable over five years in twenty equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter beginning on October 1, 2009.

    F-35


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:

             Weighted    
          Weighted  average    
          average  remaining  Aggregate 
       Number of  exercise price  contractual  intrinsic 
          shares  per share  term  value (1)
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 - $ -       
     Granted on June 22, 2009 1,928,200  2.81       
     Exercised -  -       
     Forfeited -  -       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 1,928,200 $ 2.81     6.7 years $ 4,126,348 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 - $ -  - $ - 

    (1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2009 (US$4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted on June 22, 2009 was US$2.46 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$892,295 for the year ended September 30, 2009 in respect of share options granted on June 22, 2009, which was allocated to cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses respectively.

    The fair value of the above option awards granted on June 22, 2009 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses the following assumptions.

    Expected volatility111.03%
    Expected dividendsNil
    Expected life7 years
    Risk-free interest rate3.69%

    As of September 30, 2009, there were unrecognized compensation costs of US$3,843,730 related to the above non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.

    On June 26, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors recommended and approved the grant of options to purchase 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain key management with an exercise price of US$3.24 per share. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the options will become vested and exercisable over five years in twenty equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter beginning on October 1, 2009.

    F-36


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    A summary of share option plan activity for these options during the year ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:

             Weighted    
          Weighted  average    
          average  remaining  Aggregate 
       Number of  exercise price  contractual  intrinsic 
       shares  per share  term  value (1)
     Outstanding as of October 1, 2008 - $ -       
     Granted on June 26, 2009 75,000  3.24       
     Exercised -  -       
     Forfeited -  -       
     Cancelled -  -       
                  
     Outstanding as of September 30, 2009 75,000 $ 3.24     6.7 years $ 128,250 
                  
     Exercisable as of September 30, 2009 - $ -  - $ - 

    (1) Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2009 (US$4.95) in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding or exercisable.

    The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted on June 26, 2009 was US$2.86 per share. The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$38,976 for the year ended September 30, 2009 in respect of share options granted on June 26, 2009, which was allocated to research and development expenses.

    The fair value of the above option awards granted on June 26, 2009 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model that uses the following assumptions.

    Expected volatility113.58%
    Expected dividendsNil
    Expected life7 years
    Risk-free interest rate3.51%

    As of September 30, 2009, there were unrecognized compensation costs of US$175,200 related to the above non-vested share options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 years.

    Pursuant to the Plan, and in accordance with the China BAK Battery, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the Company also granted 5,000 restricted shares to each of the two newlyexisting elected independent directors with a fair value of US$3.354.56 per share on June 25, 2007 and granted 5,000 restricted shares to one of the existing independent directors with a fair value of US$4.33 per share on July 17, 2007.August 6, 2008. The eligible directors shall vest in their rights under the restricted shares according to the following schedule:

    (i)25% of the restricted shares granted will immediately vest on the grant date; and

    (ii)The remaining 75% of the restricted shares will vest in three equal quarterly instalmentsinstallments on the last day of each subsequent quarter or in three equal quarterly instalmentsinstallments on the last day of each calendar quarter beginning on the last day of the first full calendar quarter after the grant date.


    The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expensesexpense of US$38,56830,504 and US$37,896 for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, in respect of the restricted shares granted in August 2008, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses.

    As of September 30, 2009, there were no unrecognized stock-based compensation costs associated with these restricted shares granted to non-employee directors. All of the restricted shares were issued as fully paid shares of common stock to the Company’s three independent directors on August 6, 2008, October 20, 2008, March 2, 2009 and April 2, 2009, respectively.

    F-37


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    Pursuant to the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors recommended and approved the grant of 500,000 restricted shares to Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Xiangqian Li with a fair value of US$2.81 per share on June 22, 2009. In accordance with the vesting schedule of the grant, the restricted shares will vest in twenty equal quarterly installments on the first day of each fiscal quarter beginning on October 1, 2009.

    The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$264,200 for the year ended September 30, 2009, in respect of the restricted shares granted in June and July 2007,22, 2009, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses.


    As of September 30, 2007, the Company had2009, there were unrecognized stock-based compensation costs of US$16,5821,140,800 associated with these restricted shares granted to Mr. Xiangqian Li. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.

    Pursuant to the Plan, and in accordance with the China BAK Battery, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the Company also granted 5,000 restricted shares to each of the existing elected independent directors with a fair value of US$3.24 per share on June 26, 2009. The eligible directors shall vest in their rights under the restricted shares according to the following schedule:

    (i) 25% of the restricted shares granted will immediately vest on the grant date; and

    (ii) The remaining 75% of the restricted shares will vest in three equal quarterly installments on the last day of each subsequent quarter or in three equal quarterly installments on the last day of each calendar quarter beginning on the last day of the first full calendar quarter after the grant date.

    The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expense of US$34,760 for the year ended September 30, 2009, in respect of the restricted shares granted in June 2009, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses.

    As of September 30, 2009, there were unrecognized stock-based compensation costs of US$13,840 for the year ended September 30, 2009 associated with these restricted shares granted to non-employee directors. These costs are expected to be recognised over a weighted average period of 0.3 years. As of September 30, 2007, theThe first 25% of the restricted shares were already issued as fully paid ordinary shares of common stock to the Company’s three independent directors on August 23, 2007. The next 25% of the restricted shares had not been issued to the three independent directors yet.


    July 24, 2009.

    As the Company itself is an investment holding company which is not expected to generate operating profits to realize the tax benefits arising from its net operating loss carried forward, no income tax benefits were recognized for such stock-based compensation cost under stock option plan for the years ended September 30, 20062008 and 2007.


    F-32

    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    2009.

    Employee Restricted Stock Award


    On September 22, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved the form of Termination and Release Agreement covering the cancellation of 1,400,000 shares of stock options granted to the optionees who arewere residents of the PRC. The Compensation Committee also consented to adopt the terms and provisions for the Restricted Stock Grant Agreement covering the issuance of restricted shares, and committed to determine an appropriate number of shares of restricted stock that would be granted to these optionees under the Plan (the “Replacement Awards”) during the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. In addition, the Compensation Committee also approved the officer of the Company to authorize delivery of the restricted shares to the employees. On September 28, 2006, options to purchase a total of 1,400,000 shares of common stock were cancelled pursuant to the Termination and Release Agreements signed on that day. The Replacement Awards were classified as liability-classified awards as of September 30, 2006.


    The Company has estimated the fair value of the Replacement Awards to be US$4.27 per share as of December 26, 2006, based on the estimated fair value of the cancelled options using the Black-Scholes Option Valuation Model together with the following assumptions.


    Expected volatility 89.51%89.51%
    Expected dividends Nil 
    Expected life 4.4 years 
    Risk-free interest rate 4.61%4.61%

    F-38


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    20

    Share-based Compensation (continued)

    On December 26, 2006, pursuant to the restricted stock grant agreements signed between the Company’s officers and the relevant optionees and based on the closing market price of the Company’s listed common stock on that date, i.e. US$6.25 per share, a total of 914,994 shares of restricted stock were granted as Replacement Awards to the employees who gave up their stock options and continued to be employed by the Company on that date. Fair value of the Replacement Awards granted to each optionee approximated that of the employee’s terminated stock options. The Compensation Committee ratified the grants on January 15, 2007.


    Prior to vesting, the shares of restricted stock granted to each employee pursuant to the Replacement Awards are subject to restrictions on transferability and will be forfeited if the grantee’s employment with the Company is terminated. In accordance with the vesting provisions of the grants, the shares of restricted stock will becomebecame vested and shall no longer bewere not subject to forfeiture under the following schedule:


     Number of SharesPercentage of Options IssuedInitial Vesting Date
        
     365,99840%July 1, 2007
     274,49830%January 1, 2008
     274,49830%July 1, 2008
        
     914,994100% 

    F-33


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    Upon the grant of restricted stock, the Company has reclassified share-based payment liabilities of US$3,679,934 to shareholders’ equity. The restricted stock grant is treated as equity-classified awards and the unrecognized compensation costs will bewere recognized over the vesting period. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of US$54,770556,696 for the period from October 1, 2006 to December 26, 2006 in respect of the liability-classified award, and US$1,290,040 for the period from December 26, 2006 toyear ended September 30, 20072008 in respect of the equity-classified award. These share-based compensation costs were allocated to cost of revenues, sales and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses and research and development costsexpenses respectively.


    A summary All shares of the restricted stock grant activitygranted as of September 30, 2009 vested before September 30, 2008 and no non-cash share-based compensation expense was recognized for the year ended September 30, 2007 is presented below:

        
    Weighted average
     
      
    Number of
     
    exercise price
     
      
    shares
     
    per share
     
          
    Non-vested as of October 1, 2006  - $- 
    Granted on December 26, 2006  914,994  6.25 
    Vested  353,707  6.25 
    Forfeited  30,727  6.25 
            
    Non-vested as of September 30, 2007  530,560 $6.25 

    As such share-based compensation is not deductible for income tax purpose in the PRC, no income tax benefits were recognized in this respect for the year ended September 30, 2007.

    2009.

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, there were no unrecognized compensation costs of US$556,696 related to the restricted stock granted. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average periodgrants.

    21

    Fair Value of 0.6 years.


    F-34


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors
    On May 12, 2006, the Board of Directors adopted the China BAK Battery, Inc. Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors (the “Plan 2006”). The Plan 2006 authorizes the issuance of 5,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to each of the three eligible directors in addition to their annual retainer fee. Such restricted shares entitle the relevant non-employee directors to all rights of ordinary share ownership except that the shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, exchanged or otherwise disposed of during the vesting period.

    On May 12, 2006, the Company granted 5,000 restricted shares to each of the three newly elected independent directors with a fair value of US$11.5 per share pursuant to the Plan 2006. The eligible directors shall vest in their rights under the restricted shares according to the following schedule:
    (i)25% of the restricted shares granted will immediately vest on the grant date; and
    (ii)The remaining 75% of the restricted shares will vest in three equal quarterly instalments on the last day of each subsequent quarter or in three equal quarterly instalments on the last day of each calendar quarter beginning on the last day of the first full calendar quarter after the grant date.

    The Company recorded non-cash share-based compensation expenses of US$131,320 and US$41,178 for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 respectively in respect of the above restricted shares granted to non-employee directors, which was allocated to general and administrative expenses.

    As the Company itself is an investment holding company which is not expected to generate operating profits to realize the tax benefits arising from its net operating loss carried forward, no income tax benefits were recognised for such share-based compensation cost for the years ended September 30, 2006 and 2007.

    As of September 30, 2007, there was no unrecognized stock-based compensation associated with these restricted shares granted to non-employee directors. Each of the 25% of the restricted shares were issued as fully paid ordinary shares to the three independent directors on July 19, 2006, August 16, 2006, January 8, 2007 and March 28, 2007, respectively.

    F-35


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    19
    Fair Value of Financial Instruments

    Financial Instruments

    The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and cash equivalents, pledged deposits, trade accounts receivable, other receivables, property, plant and equipment held for sale, short-term bank loans, long-term bank loans, accounts and bills payable and other payables, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments and market rates of interest.


    20
    Commitments and Contingencies

    (i)
    Capital Commitments

    22

    Commitments and Contingencies

    (i) Capital Commitments

    As of September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, the Company had the following contracted capital commitments:

       2008  2009 
            
     For construction of buildings$ 5,957,292 $ 5,950,310 
     For purchases of equipment 4,313,237  3,590,812 
            
      $10,270,529 $9,541,122 

    F-39


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    For construction of buildings $557,883 $- 
    For purchases of equipment  12,184,346  12,312,763 
            
      $12,742,229 $12,312,763 
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, BAK Tianjin had plans to construct manufacturing facilities of US$14,385,9512008 and to purchase equipment of US$6,439,034.

    (ii)
    Land Use Rights and Property Ownership Certificate

    2009 (continued)

    22

    Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

    (ii) Land Use Rights and Property Ownership Certificate

    According to the relevant PRC laws and regulations, a land use rights certificate, along with government approvals for land planning, project planning and construction, needs to be obtained before construction of a building is commenced. A property ownership certificate shall be granted by the government upon application under the condition that the aforementioned certificate and government approvals have been obtained.

    F-36


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    The Company hasdid not yet obtainedobtain the land use rightsright certificate and approvals for project-planning and construction relating to the premises occupied by the Company, BAK Industrial Park. However,Park, before construction of the buildings was commenced. On July 3, 2009, the Company had obtained approvalsthe approval for project-planning and construction from the local government of Shenzhen on June 20, 2007Shenzhen. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has obtained the aforementioned land use rights certificate and isgovernment approvals and was in the process of applyingnegotiating with the relevant government for the land use rightsapplication and acquisition of the appropriate property ownership certificate.


    Management believes that the Company will ultimately be granted a land use rightsproperty ownership certificate, and that there should be no legal barriers for the Company to obtain a property ownership certificate for the premises presently occupied by the Company in BAK Industrial Park. However, in the event that the Company fails to obtain the land use rightsproperty ownership certificate relating to BAK Industrial Park, there is a risk that the buildingsbuilding constructed will need to be vacated as illegitimate constructions and the Company might be subject to penalties and fines. However, management believes that this possibility, while present, is remote.


    Pursuant to the land use rights certificate relating to the Company’s Tianjin facility, the Tianjin government had requested that the Company complete the construction of the Tianjin facility before September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in the process of negotiating with the relevant government bureau for the extension of the completion date. If the Company fails to obtain the approval for the extension of the completion date from the relevant government bureau, there is a risk that the land use rights certificate relating to the Company’s Tianjin facility will become invalid. However, management believes that this possibility, while present, is remote.

    Pursuant to the property ownership and land use rights certificate that the Company obtained relating to the Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, the Company must complete at least 25% of the construction of the new Research and Development Test Centre by September 30, 2008. On November 11, 2008 and May 27, 2009, the Company has signed two supplement agreements with Shenzhen government to increase the dimensions of the Research and Development Test Centre. According to the supplement agreements, the Company is required to complete the construction by May 6, 2011. According to the property ownership and land use rights certificate, such rights may not be pledged without the approval of the relevant government office. The Company is required to pledge its property ownership and land use rights certificate in relation to the new Research and Development Test Centre to China Development Bank according to the loan agreement entered into with it. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in the process of negotiating with the relevant government for the requisite approval.

    The Company is not able to insure its manufacturing facilities since it has not yet received its land use rights certificate.property ownership certificates for these facilities. The Company intends to procure such insurance once it has received the certificate.

    certificates.

    On December 15, 2008, the Company purchased insurance for its manufacturing facilities at BAK Industrial Park in Shenzhen, China. Under the insurance policy entered into with Ping An Property & Casualty Insurance Company of China, Ltd, the insured amount for our manufacturing facilities at BAK Industrial Park is RMB585,373,070 (approximately $85.8 million) for the period from November 26, 2008 to August 25, 2010.

    The Company is not able to insure its new Research and Development Test Centre to be constructed in Shenzhen, China, until it receives the required property ownership and land use rights certificates. Upon receipt of such certificates, the Company intends to procure such insurance. As discussed above, the Company has obtained the land use rights certificate to the land relating to these facilities. The application for a property ownership certificate is in process with respect to the Company’s facilities in Tianjin.

    F-40


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    (iii)
    Guarantees
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    22

    Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

    (iii) Guarantees

    In order to secure the supplies of certain raw materials and equipment and upon the request of suppliers, the Company has given guaranteeguarantees to certain suppliers which are summarized as follows:


      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Guaranteed for Shenzhen Tongli Hi-tech Co. Ltd. -       
    a non-related party $2,528,861 $- 
    Guaranteed for Hunan Reshine New Material Ltd. -       
    a non-related party  -  5,325,664 
    Guaranteed for Nanjing Special Metal       
    Equipment Co. Ltd. - a non-related party  -  1,331,416 
    Guaranteed for Shenzhen Kuichong Zhenda       
    Industrial Co. Ltd. - a non-related party  1,264,430  - 
            
      $3,793,291 $6,657,080 

       2008  2009 
            
     Guaranteed for Shenzhen Tongli Hi-tech Co. Ltd. - a non-related party$ 2,933,282 $ 2,197,384 
     Guaranteed for Hunan Reshine New Material Ltd. - a non-related party 5,866,565  5,859,690 
     Guaranteed for Nanjing Special Metal Equipment Co. Ltd. - a non-related party 1,466,641  7,324,612 
     Guaranteed for Siping Juyuan Hanyang Plate Heat Exchanger Co. Ltd. - a non-related party 2,933,282  4,394,767 
     Guaranteed for Shenzhen B&G Technology Development Co. Ltd. - a non-related party 3,666,603  8,789,535 
            
      $ 16,866,373 $ 28,565,988 

    Management has assessed the fair value of the obligation arising from the above financial guarantees and considered it is immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, no obligations in respect of the above guarantees were recognized as of September 30, 2007.

    (iv)
    Outstanding Discounted Bills and Transferred Bills

    2009.

    (iv) Outstanding Discounted Bills and Transferred Bills

    From time to time, the Company factors bills receivable to banks and endorses the bank acceptance bills received to its suppliers, vendors or other parties for settlement of its liabilities to these creditors. At the time of the factoring and transfer, all rights and privileges of holding the receivables are transferred to the banks and the creditors. The Company removes the assets from its books and records a corresponding expense for the amount of the discount. The Company remains contingently liable on the amount outstanding in the event the bill issuer defaults.


    The Company's outstanding discounted and transferred bills as of September 30, 20062008 and 20072009 are summarized as follows:

      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Bank acceptance bills $1,972,303 $17,851,850 
    Commercial acceptance bills  5,013,466  - 
            
      $6,985,769 $17,851,850 
    F-37

       2008  2009 
            
     Commercial bills$ - $ 439,477 
     Bank acceptance bills 34,721,831  13,469,235 
            
      $ 34,721,831 $ 13,908,712 

    F-41


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries


    Notes to the consolidated financial statements

    As of September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (continued)

    (v)
    Litigation and claims

    22

    Commitments and Contingencies (continued)

    (v) Litigation and claims

    On September 12, 2006, Hydro-Quebec, a Canadian company, and the Board of Regents of the University of Texas System brought a federal patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas against the Company. The Company has an agreement with A123Systems, Inc., under which the Company agrees to manufacture products for A123Systems, Inc. according to the specifications furnished by, and using the finished electrodes and other materials consigned by, A123Systems, Inc. to the Company. The plaintiffs alleged that by manufacturing rechargeable lithium cells for one of the Company’s customers, A123Systems Inc., for use in DeWalt 36-volt cordless power tools manufactured by Black & Decker, Corporation, the Company has infringed two U.S. patents owned by and exclusively licensed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and damages in an unspecified amount. A123Systems, Black & Decker Corporation and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. have also been named as co-defendants in this lawsuit. The court has not ruled on this lawsuit. The Company understands that this lawsuit is a countersuit against A123Systems, which filed a claim against Hydro-Quebec in the United States District Court of Massachusetts in April 2006. In that suit, A123Systems sought declaratory relief that the two said U.S. patents are invalid and that A123Systems is not infringing either of these two patents.

    Following the filing of the lawsuit, the United States Patent and Trademark Office reexamined the patents. The patents were re-issued with substantial modification of the patent claims. The plaintiffs have advised that, in their view, the lawsuit continues to be viable against the defendants, including China BAK. The plaintiffs' position has not been tested. Currently pending is the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to take the USPTO action into account.

    If the court issueswere to issue an adverse decision, the Company could face a substantial monetary damages award. While such an adverse decision could also prohibit the Company from future production of rechargeable lithium cells manufactured for A123Systems or may be requiredrequire the Company to pay royalties to engage in any such production, the plaintiffs substantial monetary damages.Company has no plans to pursue production of batteries for A123. The court has not yet issued any substantive decisions in the litigation and there has been no substantive pretrial discovery. As a decision onresult, at this matter andtime, the Company is unable to quantifyexpress a view on the extent of any possible award of damages that might become payable by the Company.


    The agreement with A123Systems, Inc., under which the Company agrees to manufacture products for A123Systems, Inc. according to the specifications furnished by, and using the finished electrodes and other materials consigned by, A123Systems, Inc. to the Company, had terminated on August 30, 2007.

    21
    Related Party Transactions

    (i)In October 2003, the Company acquired intangible assets from an entity controlled by Mr. Xianqian Li, the Chairman and the then controlling shareholder of the Company, for US$3,866,088, and paid in cash. The consideration paid by the Company in excess of the Chairman's carrying cost of the intangible assets, which was nil, was charged to retained earnings as a distribution to the Chairman, resulting in the acquired intangible assets being recorded by the Company at the Chairman's original cost basis.
    (ii)Amounts due from related parties in the consolidated balance sheets consist of short term advances made by the Company to a former shareholder. The advances bore no interest, had no formal repayment terms and had been fully repaid on December 14, 2005.

    (iii)On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with HFG International Ltd. (“HFG”), of which HFG provided financial consulting services to the Company, as described below, for a period of one year for a fee of US$400,000. HFG is controlled by a shareholder of the Company.
    Under the agreement, HFG provided the Company with, among other things, advice on the development and implementation of a restructuring plan, resulting in an organizational structure that would facilitate the registration of the Company's securities, assistance to the Company in engaging qualified professionals to facilitate the Company's plan, assistance in identifying potential merger candidates, assistingbe rendered in the preparation of the necessary documentationlitigation.

    23

    Significant Concentrations

    (a) Customers and assistance with solicitation of equity financing.


    The fee was paid from the proceeds of the equity capital raised by HFG on behalf of the Company. The fee to HFG was offset against the proceeds from the offerings as a cost of raising capital in 2005. The principal stockholder in HFG was also the former Chief Executive Officer of Medina Coffee, Inc. Credit Concentrations

    The Company believed that the fee charged to the Company for the services of HFG was on essentially the same terms as those charged by HFG for financial consulting services performed for HFG's other clients.


    F-38

    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
    22
    Significant Concentrations

    (a)
    Customers and Credit Concentrations

    The Group had only one customer that individually comprised 10% or more of net revenue for the year ended September 30, 2007, as follows:

                                  2007                                2008                                2009    
            %           
                        
     A123System, Inc.$ 20,586,775  14 $ -  - $ -  - 

    No customer individually comprised 10% or more of net revenue for the years ended September 30, 20062008 and 2007, as follows:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
        %
     
     
     
    %
     
     
     
    % 
                  
    A123System, Inc. $-  - $18,537,334  13 $20,586,775  14 

    2009.

    As of September 30, 2005, the Company did not have balance of gross trade accounts receivable due from A123System, Inc. As of September 30, 2006 and 2007, approximately 1% and 3% of gross trade accounts receivable was due from this customer respectively.A123Systems Inc.. On August 30, 2007, the Company’s agreement with this customer terminated in accordance with its terms. The Company is undertaking to negotiate withdid not have a balance of gross trade accounts receivables due from this customer regarding the foregoingas of September 30, 2008 and believes the termination of business relationship has no material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.


    (b)
    Credit Risk

    2009.

    (b) Credit Risk

    Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and pledged deposits. As of September 30, 20062008 and 2007,2009, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and pledged deposits were held by major financial institutions located in the PRC, which management believes are of high credit quality.

    F-42


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    24

    Segment Information

    23

    Segment Information

    The Company currently engages in the manufacture, commercialization and distribution of a wide variety of standard and customized lithium ion rechargeable batteries for use in a wide array of applications. TheDuring the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company manufacturesmanufactured six types of Li-ion rechargeable batteries: steel-case cell, aluminium-casealuminum-case cell, battery pack, cylindrical cell, polymer cell and high-power lithium-phosphate cell.The Company's products are sold to packing plants operated by third parties primarily for use in mobile phones and other electronic devices. Net revenues for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 were as follows:

    Net revenues by product:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
     
     
     
     
    %
     
     
     
    %
     
     
     
    % 
                  
    Steel-case Cell $56,964,711  55.89 $64,299,407  44.71 $34,868,786  23.91 
    Aluminium-case cell  23,721,464  23.27  49,514,304  34.43  69,916,244  47.93 
    High-power lithium-                   
    phosphate cell  -  -  18,537,334  12.89  20,561,865  14.10 
    Battery pack  20,168,147  19.79  9,842,539  6.84  11,797,560  8.09 
    Cylindrical cell  1,050,900  1.03  607,608  0.42  3,421,901  2.34 
    Polymer cell  16,361  0.02  1,027,824  0.71  5,294,543  3.63 
                        
      $101,921,583  100.00 $143,829,016  100.00 $145,860,899  100.00 
    F-39

    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As

       2007     2008     2009    
          %     %     % 
                        
     Steel-case cell$ 34,868,786  23.91 $ 29,299,493  11.94 $ 4,979,548  2.36 
     Aluminum-case cell 69,916,244  47.93  130,109,946  53.03  111,700,018  52.90 
     High-power lithium- phosphate cell 20,561,865  14.10  -  -  179,389  0.09 
     Battery pack 11,797,560  8.09  25,500,658  10.40  24,705,154  11.70 
     Cylindrical cell 3,421,901  2.34  42,566,664  17.35  55,348,867  26.21 
     Polymer cell 5,294,543  3.63  17,870,808  7.28  14,230,995  6.74 
                        
      $ 145,860,899  100.00 $ 245,347,569  100.00 $ 211,143,971  100.00 

    The manufacturing of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    23
    Segment Information (continued)

    steel-case cells was discontinued in January 2009.

    Net revenues by geographic area:


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
     
     
     
     
    %
     
     
     
    %
     
     
     
    % 
                  
    PRC Mainland $72,352,373  70.99 $96,669,615  67.21 $105,567,176  72.38 
    United States of America  -  -  18,641,035  12.96  20,740,356  14.22 
    Hong Kong, China  17,534,684  17.20  17,220,619  11.98  6,417,931  4.40 
    The Republic of Turkey  7,650,144  7.51  4,622,618  3.21  -  - 
    Others  4,384,382  4.30  6,675,129  4.64  13,135,436  9.00 
                        
      $101,921,583  100.00 $143,829,016  100.00 $145,860,899  100.00 

       2007     2008     2009    
          %     %     % 
                        
     PRC Mainland$ 105,567,176  72.38 $ 175,302,425  71.45 $ 132,709,688  62.85 
     PRC Taiwan 7,025,209  4.82  41,904,752  17.08  47,663,572  22.57 
     India 4,299,314  2.95  5,660,586  2.31  10,525,872  4.99 
     United States of America 20,740,356  14.22  75,030  0.03  1,412,803  0.67 
     Hong Kong, China 6,417,931  4.40  19,955,673  8.13  16,086,222  7.62 
     Others 1,810,913  1.23  2,449,103  1.00  2,745,814  1.30 
                        
      $ 145,860,899  100.00 $ 245,347,569  100.00 $ 211,143,971  100.00 

    Substantially all of the Company’s long-lived assets are located in the PRC.

    F-43


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    24
    China BAK Battery, Inc. (Parent Company)
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    25

    China BAK Battery, Inc. (Parent Company)

    Under PRC regulations, Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC GAAP. In addition, Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin are required to set aside at least 10% of their after-tax net profits each year, if any, to fund the statutory general reserve until the balance of the reserves reaches 50% of their registered capital. The statutory general reserves are not distributable in the form of cash dividends to the Company and can be used to make up cumulative prior year losses, if any, and may be converted into share capital by the issue of new shares to shareholders in proportion to their existing shareholdings, or by increasing the par value of the shares currently held by them, provided that the reserve balance after such issue is not less than 25% of the registered capital. As of September 30, 2007,2009, additional transfers of US$88,309,292 are82,207,805 were required before the statutory general reserve reached 50% of the registered capital of Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin. As of September 30, 2007,2009, US$6,426,9777,227,195 has been appropriated from retained earnings and set aside for statutory general reserves by Shenzhen BAK BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin.


    Electronics. BAK Tianjin did not have after-tax net profits since its incorporation and therefore no appropriation was made to fund its statutory general reserve as of September 30, 2009.

    As of September 30, 2007,2009, the amount of restricted net assets of Shenzhen BAK, BAK Electronics and BAK Tianjin, which may not be transferred to the Company in the forms of loans, advances or cash dividends by the subsidiaries without the consent of a third party, was approximately 5% of the Company’s consolidated net assets as discussed above. In addition, the current foreign exchange control policies applicable in the PRC also restrict the transfer of assets on dividends outside the PRC.


    F-40

    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)

    The following presents unconsolidated financial information of the parent company only:

    Condensed Balance SheetSheets as of September 30, 20062008 and 2009

       2008  2009 
     Cash and cash equivalents$ 34 $ 34 
     Other receivables  86,709   114,034 
     Investments in subsidiaries  173,854,017   164,326,246 
            
              Total assets$ 173,940,760 $ 164,440,314 
            
     Other current liabilities$ 6,868,760 $ 7,839,444 
            
              Total liabilities$ 6,868,760 $ 7,839,444 
            
     Total shareholders’ equity$ 167,072,000 $ 156,600,870 
            
              Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$ 173,940,760 $ 164,440,314 

    F-44


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2007,

      
    2006
     
    2007
     
          
    Cash and cash equivalents $19,889 $19,114 
    Investments in subsidiaries $116,595,727 $131,589,986 
           
    Total assets $116,615,616 $131,609,100 
            
    Other current liabilities $2,987,587 $4,877,188 
           
    Total liabilities $2,987,587 $4,877,188 
          
            
    Total shareholders’ equity $113,628,029 $126,731,912 
            
    Total liabilities and       
    shareholders’ equity $116,615,616 $131,609,100 
    2008 and 2009 (continued)

    25

    China BAK Battery, Inc. (Parent Company) (continued)

    Condensed Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
            
            
    General and administrative expenses $(31,374)$(3,063,704)$(1,970,123)
    Investment income  13,527,922  23,228,270  2,453,451 
               
    Income before income taxes  13,496,548  20,164,566  483,328 
    Income taxes  -  -  - 
               
    Net income $13,496,548 $20,164,566 $483,328 
    2009

       2007  2008  2009 
     General and administrative expenses$ (1,970,123)$ (2,664,359)$ (1,043,339)
     Investment income / (loss) 2,453,451  (5,276,241) (12,948,154)
               
     Income / (loss) before income taxes 483,328  (7,940,600) (13,991,493)
     Income taxes -  -  - 
               
     Net income / (loss)$ 483,328 $ (7,940,600)$ (13,991,493)

    Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 2007


      
    2005
     
    2006
     
    2007
     
    Cash flow from operating activities
           
            
    Net income $13,496,548 $20,164,566 $483,328 
    Adjustment to reconcile net income          
    to net cash (used in) / provided by operating activities:          
    Share-based compensation  -  131,320  79,747 
    Investment income  (13,527,922) (23,228,270) (2,453,451)
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
    Other liabilities  (35,605) 2,952,273  1,889,601 
               
    Net cash (used in) / provided by operating activities  (66,979) 19,889  (775)
    F-41


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    As of September 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 (continued)
           
    Capital contribution to a          
    wholly owned subsidiary  (55,312,177) -  - 
               
    Net cash used in investing activities  (55,312,177) -  - 
            
               
    Cash flow from financing activities
              
    Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net  55,379,156  -  - 
               
    Net cash provided by financing activities  55,379,156  -  - 
            
    Net increase / (decrease) in cash and
              
    cash equivalents
      
    -
      
    19,889
      
    (775
    )
               
    Cash and cash equivalents
              
    at the beginning of year
      -  -  19,889 
               
    Cash and cash equivalents
              
     $- $19,889 $19,114 

    2009

       2007  2008  2009 
     Cash flow from operating activities         
               
     Net income / (loss)$ 483,328 $ (7,940,600)$ (13,991,493)
     Adjustment to reconcile net income / (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:      
              Share-based compensation 79,747  47,086  72,656 
              Investment (income) / loss (2,453,451) 5,276,241  12,948,154 
     Changes in operating assets and liabilities:         
              Other receivables -  (86,709) (27,325)
              Other liabilities 1,889,601  1,991,572  970,682 
               
     Net cash used in operating activities (775) (712,410) (27,326)
               
     Cash flow from investing activities         
     Advances to subsidiaries -  (28,545,878) (123,003)
               
     Net cash used in investing activities -  (28,545,878) (123,003)
               
     Cash flow from financing activities         
     Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net -  29,239,208  150,329 
               
     Net cash provided by financing activities -  29,239,208  150,329 
               
     Net decrease in cash andcash equivalents (775) (19,080) - 
               
     Cash and cash equivalentsat the beginning of year 19,889  19,114  34 
               
     Cash and cash equivalentsat the end of year$ 19,114 $ 34 $ 34 

    The details of the Company’s investment in subsidiaries and the net proceeds from issuance of its capital stock are fully described in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity, Note 1 and Note 1416 to the consolidated financial statements.

    F-45


    China BAK Battery, Inc. and subsidiaries

    25
    Subsequent Events
    Notes to the consolidated financial statements
    (i)On October 9, 2007, Shenzhen BAK obtained the Approval Certificate of Overseas Investments of Chinese Enterprises to invest in a wholly owned subsidiary in Germany, BAK Europe GmbH, with registered capital of US$275,300.

    (ii)On November 5, 2007, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (collectively, the “Investors”). Under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors 3,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”) at a price per share of US$3.90, which represents approximately 6.6% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Company as of and immediately after consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Securities Purchase Agreement, for an aggregate purchase price of US$13.7 million.

    As of September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 (continued)

    26

    Subsequent Events

    On October 28, 2009, the Company completed a registered direct offering of 5,790,000 units, each unit consisting of a share of common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.25 of a share of common stock. The Private Placement closed on November 9, 2007. Allprice of the 3,500,000securities sold was $3.55 per unit, for an aggregate purchase price of US$20,554,500. Pursuant to subscription agreements between the Company and the investors in this offering, the warrants may be exercised to purchase an aggregate of 1,447,500 shares were sold. Roth Capital Partners,of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $3.90 per share. The warrants are exercisable for 24 months beginning on the date of the initial issuance of the warrants. Cowen and Company, LLC, ("Roth")a subsidiary of Cowen Group, Inc., acted as the Company's placementexclusive investment agent in connection with the Private Placement. As compensation for its services, Rothregistered direct offering and received a cash fee equal toof US$819,000,1,027,725, representing 6%5% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of the shares.

    (iii)As disclosed in Note 1, on October 22, 2007, the Company entered into the Settlement Agreement with Mr. Xiangqian Li, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and BAK International. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Mr. Xiangqian Li agreed to deliver the 1,089,775 shares related to the 2005 performance threshold to BAK International; BAK International in turn agreed to deliver the shares to the Company. Upon receipt of these shares, the Company agreed to release all claims and causes of action against Mr. Xiangqian Li and certain other persons regarding the shares. On October 25, 2007, the 1,089,775 shares were delivered to the Company, and such shares are now held as treasury shares. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company is obligated to commence negotiations with the investors who participated in the Company’s January 2005 private placement in order to achieve a complete settlement of BAK International’s obligations (and the Company’s obligations to the extent it has any) under the applicable agreements with such investors.


    F-42
    Shares and warrants. Pursuant to an amendment to the placement agency agreement, the Company also agreed to pay Cowen and Company, LLC, an aggregate commission equal to 5% of the gross exercise price of received from investors for the exercise of the warrants in the offering. The placement agent had no obligation to buy any of the shares from the Company. As of October 28, 2009, 5,790,000 shares had been issued and no warrants had been exercised.

    On November 16, 2009, BAK International contributed approximately US$9,000,000 capital to BAK Tianjin and the Capital Injection Verification Report of BAK Tianjin has been obtained.

    Apart from the aforementioned, the Company has evaluated all other subsequent events through December 14, 2009, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued, and determined that there were no other subsequent events or transactions that require recognition or disclosures in the financial statements.

    F-46



    SIGNATURES


    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China, on December 18, 2007.

    14, 2009.

     CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC.
      
     
    CHINA BAK BATTERY, INC.



    By: /s//s/ Xiangqian Li
     
    Xiangqian Li
     
    Director, Chairman of the Board,
    President and Chief Executive Officer

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on December 18, 2007.


    14, 2009.

    Each person whose signature appears below hereby authorizes Xiangqian Li and Tony Shen, or any of them, as attorneys-in-fact to sign on his or her behalf, individually, and in each capacity stated below, and to file all amendments and/or supplements to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     
    Title
       
    /s/ Xiangqian Li  
    Name: Xiangqian Li
     Director, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)  
       (Principal Executive Officer)
    /s/ Tony Shen  
    Name: Tony Shen
     Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial
    Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
       (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
    /s/ Huanyu Mao  
    Name: Huanyu Mao
     Director, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technical Officer
       
    /s/ Charlene Spoede Budd  
    Name: Charlene Spoede Budd
     Director
       
    /s/ Chunzhi Zhang  
    Name: Chunzhi Zhang
     Director
       
    /s/ Richard B. Goodner  
    Name: Richard B. Goodner
     Director