UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



 

FORM 10-K



 

 
(Mark One)   
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20072009

OR

 
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the Transition Period from  to 

Commission File Number: 2-81353000-11486



 

CENTER BANCORP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 
New Jersey 52-1273725
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)		 (IRS Employer
Identification Number)

2455 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ 07083-0007

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(908) 688-9500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)



 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:None

Common Stock, No Par Value

(Title of Class)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common stock, no par value None

(Title of class)



 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.YesAct.
Yeso NONox

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.Yeso NOAct. Yes or Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesdays. Yesx NONoo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Regulation S-T (232,405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant has required to submit and post such files.)Yeso Noo Not applicable

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to the Form 10-K.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smallsmaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “small“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).1934.

   
Large accelerated filerAccelerated Filero Accelerated filerFilerx Non-accelerated filerNon-Acceleratedo Small Reporting Companyo

(Do not check if a small reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)Yeso NOor Nox

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter — $170.9$78.3 million

Shares outstandingOutstanding on February 29, 2008March 1, 2010

Common stock,Stock, no par value: 13,127,96014,574,872 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Definitive proxy statement in connection with the 20082010 Annual Stockholders Meeting to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A will be incorporated by reference in Part III.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page
PART I
 

Item 1.

Business

  1 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

  1014 

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

  1220 

Item 2.

Properties

  1220 

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

  1321 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

13

Item 4A.3A.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

  1322

Item 4.

Reserved

23 
PART II
 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  1423 

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

  1726 

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  1828 

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  4961 

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:

  F-1 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Center Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2 - F-4
Consolidated Statements of Condition  F-6F-3 
Consolidated Statements of Income  F-7F-4 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity  F-8F-5 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  F-9F-6 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  F-10F-8 

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  5165 

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

  5165 

Item 9B.

Other Information

  5367 
PART III
 

Item 10.

Directors and Corporate Governance

  5368 

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

  5368 

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  5368 

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  5368 

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  5368 
PART IV
 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statements and Schedules

  5469 
Signatures
  72 

Information included in or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Corporation’s press releases or other public statements, contain or may contain forward looking statements. Please refer to a discussion of the Corporation’s forward looking statements and associated risks in “Item 1 — Business — Historical Development of Business” and “Item 1A — Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-K
  
FORM 10-K

PART I

Item 1. Business

A) Historical Development of Business

This report, in Item 1, Item 7 and elsewhere, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Center Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including statements preceded by, followed by or that include words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” “pattern” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may” or similar expressions. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (1) competitive pressures among depository institutions may increase significantly; (2) changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins; (3) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions may vary substantially from period to period; (4) general economic conditions may be less favorable than expected; (5) political developments, wars or other hostilities may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions; (6) legislative or regulatory changes or actions may adversely affect the businesses in which Center Bancorp, Inc. is engaged; (7) changes and trends in the securities markets may adversely impact Center Bancorp;Bancorp, Inc; (8) a delayed or incomplete resolution of regulatory issues could adversely impact our planning; (9) the impact onof reputation risk created by the developments discussed above on such matters as business generation and retention, funding and liquidity could be significant; and (10) the outcome of regulatory and legal investigations and proceedings may not be anticipated. Further information on other factors that could affect the financial results of Center Bancorp, Inc. are included in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Center Bancorp’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available free of charge at the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov and/or from Center Bancorp.Bancorp, Inc. Center Bancorp, Inc. assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements at any time.

Center Bancorp, Inc., a one-bank holding company, was incorporated in the state of New Jersey on November 12, 1982. Center Bancorp, Inc., commenced operations on May 1, 1983, upon the acquisition of all outstanding shares of Thecapital stock of Union Center National Bank (the “Bank”), its principal subsidiary. The holding company’s sole activity, at this time, is to act as a holding company for the Bank and itsother subsidiaries. As used herein, the term “Corporation” shall refer to Center Bancorp, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries and the term “Parent Corporation” shall refer to Center Bancorp, Inc. on an unconsolidated basis. In addition to its principal subsidiary, Center Bancorp, Inc. owns 100 percent of the voting shares of Center Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust II, through which it issued trust preferred securities. Center Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust II is not a consolidated subsidiary. See Note 1410 of the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Corporation’s wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries are all included in the consolidated financial statements of Center Bancorp, Inc. These subsidiaries include an advertising subsidiary; an insurance subsidiary offering annuity products, property and casualty, life and health insurance, and various investment subsidiaries which hold, maintain and manage investment assets for the Corporation. TheIn the past, the Corporation’s subsidiaries have also includeincluded real estate investment trust subsidiaries (the “REIT” subsidiaries) which own real estate related investments and a REIT subsidiary that owns some of the real estate loanstwo title insurance partnerships. The title insurance partnerships were liquidated and related real estate investments. All subsidiaries mentioned above are directly or indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation, except that the Corporation owns less than 100 percent of the preferred stock of the REIT subsidiaries. Each REIT must have 100 or more shareholders to qualify as a REIT, and therefore, each REIT has issued less than 20 percent of their outstanding non-voting preferred stock to individuals, most of whom are non-senior management Union Center National Bank employees.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ceased operations in December 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Corporation effected an internal entity reorganization and adopted a plan of liquidation for its one remaining REIT subsidiary, which was completed on November 16, 2007.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2001 and 2003, the Corporation formed statutory business trusts, which exist for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of a trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trusts are not consolidated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) FASB ASC 810-10 (previously FASB interpretation No. 4646(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Corporation issued $10.3 million of subordinated debentures in 2001 and $5.2 million in 2003 of subordinated debentures.debentures in 2003. On December 18, 2006, the Corporation redeemed $10.3 million of subordinated debentures and dissolved Center Bancorp, Inc. Statutory Trust I. At December 31, 2007,2009, the $5.2 million still outstanding of these securities still outstanding are included as a component of Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes. The Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 8.137.80 percent at December 31, 2007.2009.

During 2002, the Bank established two investment subsidiaries to hold portions of its securities portfolio. At December 2007, under a plan of liquidation adopted by the Bank, one of the investment companies had been liquidated. During 2008, the Corporation formed a new investment company. In January of 2003, the Corporation established an insurance subsidiary for the sale of insurance and annuity products. The Corporation also formed a title insurance partnership during the later part of 2007 to bethat was fully operational in 2008.

The Corporation completed During the acquisitionearly part of Red Oak Bank as of the close of business on May 20, 2005. Red Oak Bank was a State chartered commercial bank and operated one full service branch location in Hanover Township, Morris County, New Jersey.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, 50% of Red Oak Bank’s common stock was converted into the Parent’s Common Stock at an exchange rate of .9227 of the Parent’s shares per each Red Oak Bank share and 50% was converted into $12.06 in cash for each Red Oak Bank share. The aggregate consideration paid in the merger consisted of $13.3 million in cash and 1,015,816 shares of the Parent’s common stock. The cash portion of the merger consideration was funded through the sale of securities available for sale and cash from continuing operations. The Corporation additionally converted remaining stock options covering 56,266 shares of Red Oak Bank common stock outstanding at the time of the merger, these options were exchanged for options covering 54,514 shares of Center Bancorp, Inc. common stock.

As a result of the Red Oak Bank acquisition,2008, the Corporation acquired assets havingformed a fair valuesecond title partnership that was fully operational during the second half of $115.3 million, including $89.6 million of net loans, $5.4 million of investment securities and $2.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, and assumed $70.7 million of deposits, $17.1 million of borrowings, and $792,000 of other liabilities.

The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase2008. Both title insurance partnerships were liquidated during December, 2009 and the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) in the transaction was $14.7 million. Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, goodwill is not being amortized in connection with this transaction and the goodwill will not be deductible for income tax purposes. The Corporation also recorded a core deposit intangible of $702,617 in connection with the acquisition, which is being amortized on a 10-year sum of the digits method.Bank no longer provides title insurance.

SEC Reports and Corporate Governance

The Parent Corporation makes its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments thereto available on its website atwww.centerbancorp.com without charge as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing them to the SEC. Also available on the website are Center Bancorp’sthe Corporation’s corporate code of ethics that applies to all of Center Bancorp’sthe Corporation’s employees, including principal officers and directors, and charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Center Bancorp, Inc.The Parent Corporation has filed the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 with respect to Center Bancorp’sthe Parent Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as exhibits to this Report. Center Bancorp’s CEO submitted the required annual CEO’s Certification regarding the NASDAQ’s corporate governance listing standards, Section 12(a) CEO Certification, to the NASDAQ within the required timeframetime frame after the 20072009 annual shareholders’ meeting.

Additionally, the Parent Corporation will provide without charge, a copy of its Annual Report on Form 10-K to any shareholder by mail. Requests should be sent to Center Bancorp, Inc, Attention: Shareholder Relations, 2455 Morris Avenue, Union, New Jersey, 07083.

B) Narrative Description of the Business

The Bank offers a broad range of lending, depository and related financial services to commercial, industrial and governmental customers. In 1999, the Bank obtained full trust powers, enabling it to offer a variety of trust services to its customers. In the lending area, the Bank’s services include short and medium term loans, lines of credit, letters of credit, working capital loans, real estate construction loans and mortgage loans. In the depository area, the Bank offers demand deposits, savings accounts and time deposits. In addition, the Bank offers collection services, wire transfers, night depository and lock box services.

The Bank offers a broad range of consumer banking services, including interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, IRA accounts, Automated Teller Machine (“ATM”) accessibility using Star Systems, Inc. service, secured and unsecured loans, mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, safe deposit boxes, Christmas club accounts, vacation club accounts, money orders and traveler’stravelers’ checks.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Bank, through its subsidiary, Center Financial Group LLC, provides financial services, including brokerage services, insurance and annuities, mutual funds and financial planning. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Corporation formed a title insurance partnership, Center Title LLC, with Progressive Title Company in Parsippany, New Jersey to provide title services in connection with the closing of real estate transactions. In January 2008, the Corporation formed a title insurance partnership, Union Title LLC, with Elite Title Abstract of West Caldwell, New Jersey to provide title services in connection with the closing of real estate loan transactions. Our partnerships with both title companies were liquidated during December, 2009.

The Bank offers various money market services. It deals in U.S. Treasury and U.S. Governmental agency securities, certificates of deposits,deposit, commercial paper and repurchase agreements.

The Bank entered into a limited liability company operating agreement with Morris Property Company, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company, during the fourth quarter of 2008. The purpose of Morris Property Company, LLC is to hold foreclosed assets.

Competitive pressures affect the Corporation’s manner of conducting business. Competition stems not only from other commercial banks but also from other financial institutions such as savings banks, savings and loan associations, mortgage companies, leasing companies and various other financial service and advisory companies. Many of the financial institutions operating in the Corporation’s primary market are substantially larger and offer a wider variety of products and services than the Corporation.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

Supervision and Regulation

The banking industry is highly regulated. Statutory and regulatory controls increase a bank holding company’s cost of doing business and limit the options of its management to deploy assets and maximize income. The following discussion is not intended to be a complete list of all the activities regulated by the banking laws or of the impact of such laws and regulations on the Corporation or its Bank subsidiary. It is intended only to briefly summarize some material provisions.

Bank Holding Company Regulation

Center Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “Holding Company Act”). As a bank holding company, the Parent Corporation is supervised by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) and is required to file reports with the FRB and provide such additional information as the FRB may require. The Parent Corporation and it subsidiaries are subject to examination by the FRB.

On November 9, 2007, the FRB approved the Parent Corporation’s application to become a Financial Holding Company. A Financial Holding Company may perform the following activities: insurance underwriting, securities dealing and underwriting, financial and investment advisory services, merchant banking and issuing or selling securitiessecurity interests in bank-eligible assets and generally engagingassets. Financial Holding Companies may also engage in any non-bankingother activity authorized bythat the FRB determines to be financial in nature or incidental to financial activities after consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury. A Financial Holding Company Act.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTSmay also engage in any non-financial activity that the FRB determines is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety or soundness of depository institutions or the financial system. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation officially rescinded its status as a financial services holding company as a result of the discontinuation of the title insurance activities.

The Holding Company Act prohibits the Corporation, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank and from engaging in any business other than that of banking, managing and controlling banks or furnishing services to subsidiary banks, except that it may, upon application, engage in, and may own shares of companies engaged in, certain businesses found by the FRB to be so closely related to banking “as to be a proper incident thereto.” The Holding Company Act requires prior approval by the FRB of the acquisition by Center Bancorp, Inc. of more than five percent of the voting stock of any other bank. Satisfactory capital ratios and Community Reinvestment Act ratings and anti-money laundering policies are generally prerequisites to obtaining federal regulatory approval to make acquisitions. The policy of the FRB provides that a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support the subsidiary bank in circumstances in which it might not do so absent that policy.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acquisitions through Union Center National Bank require approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the United States (“OCC”). The Holding Company Act does not place territorial restrictions on the activities of non-bank subsidiaries of bank holding companies. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, discussed below, allows the Corporation to expand into insurance, securities, merchant banking activities, and other activities that are financial in nature.

The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Interstate Banking and Branching Act”) enables bank holding companies to acquire banks in states other than itstheir home state, regardless of applicable state law. The Interstate Banking and Branching Act also authorizes banks to merge across state lines, thereby creating interstate banks with branches in more than one state. Under the legislation, each state had the opportunity to “opt-out” of this provision. Furthermore, a state may “opt-in” with respect tode novo branching, thereby permitting a bank to open new branches in a state in which the bank does not already have a branch. Withoutde novo branching, an out-of-state commercial bank can enter the state only by acquiring an existing bank or branch. The vast majority of states have allowed interstate banking by merger but have not authorizedde novo branching.

New Jersey enacted legislation to authorize interstate banking and branching and the entry into New Jersey of foreign country banks. New Jersey did not authorizede novo branching into the state. However, under federal law, federal savings banks which meet certain conditions may branchde novo into a state, regardless of state law.

The Parent Corporation is required to file with the FRB an annual report and such additional information as the FRB may require pursuant to the Holding Company Act. In addition, the FRB makes periodic examinations of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. The Holding Company Act requires each bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before it may acquire substantially all of the assets of any bank, or before it may acquire ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank, if, after such acquisition, it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5 percent of the voting shares of such bank. The Holding Company Act limits the activities which may be engaged in by the Corporation and its subsidiaries to those of banking, the ownership and acquisition of assets and securities of banking organizations, and the management of banking organizations, and to certain non-banking activities which the FRB finds, by order or regulation, to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling a bank as to be a proper incident thereto.

The FRB is empowered to differentiate between activities by a bank holding company or a subsidiary thereof and activities commenced by acquisition of a going concern. With respect to non-banking activities, the FRB has by regulation determined that several non-banking activities are closely related to banking within the meaning of the Holding Company Act and thus may be performed by bank holding companies.

Regulation of Bank Subsidiary

The operations of the Bank are subject to requirements and restrictions under federal law, including requirements to maintain reserves against deposits, restrictions on the types and amounts of loans that may be granted, and limitations on the types of investments that may be made and the types of services which may be offered. Various consumer laws and regulations also affect the operations of the Bank. Approval of the Comptroller of the Currency is required for branching, bank mergers in which the continuing bank is a national bank and in connection with certain fundamental corporate changes affecting the Bank. There are

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

various legal limitations, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which govern the extent to which a bank subsidiary may finance or otherwise supply funds to its holding company or its holding company’s non-bank subsidiaries. Under federal law, no bank subsidiary may, subject to certain limited exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or investments in the securities of, its parent or the non-bank subsidiaries of its parent (other than direct subsidiaries of such bank which are not financial subsidiaries) or take their securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. Each bank subsidiary is also subject to collateral security requirements for any loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.

The Bank and the OCC have entered into an informal Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU. A memorandum of understanding is characterized by the regulatory authorities as an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action. Among other things, under the MOU, the Bank has agreed to develop a three year capital program, which will include specific plans for the maintenance of adequate capital and the strengthening of the Bank’s capital structure to meet the Bank’s current and future needs, a profit plan that includes the identification of the major areas and means by which the Board will seek to improve the Bank’s operating performance, and a dividend policy that permits the declaration of a dividend by the Bank only with the prior approval of the OCC. Management is committed to addressing and resolving the issues raised by the OCC and has substantially completed corrective actions to comply with the MOU. In addition, the OCC has established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank than the regulatory minimums. See “FDICIA.”


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Regulation W

The Federal Reserve Board has issued Regulation W, which codifies prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and interpretative guidance with respect to affiliate transactions. Regulation W incorporates the exemption from the affiliate transaction rules but expands the exemption to cover the purchase of any type of loan or extension of credit from an affiliate. Affiliates of a bank include, among other entities, the bank’s holding company and companies that are under common control with the bank. The Parent Corporation is considered to be an affiliate of the Bank. In general, subject to certain specified exemptions, a bank or its subsidiaries are limited in their ability to engage in “covered transactions” with affiliates:

to an amount equal to 10% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with any one affiliate; and
to an amount equal to 20% of the bank’s capital and surplus, in the case of covered transactions with all affiliates.

In addition, a bank and its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions and other specified transactions only on terms and under circumstances that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank or its subsidiary, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. A “covered transaction” includes:

a loan or extension of credit to an affiliate;
a purchase of, or an investment in, securities issued by an affiliate;
a purchase of assets from an affiliate, with some exceptions;
the acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as collateral for a loan or extension of credit to any party; and
the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate.

In addition, under Regulation W:

a bank and its subsidiaries may not purchase a low-quality asset from an affiliate;
covered transactions and other specified transactions between a bank or its subsidiaries and an affiliate must be on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices; and
with some exceptions, each loan or extension of credit by a bank to an affiliate must be secured by certain types of collateral with a market value ranging from 100% to 130%, depending on the type of collateral, of the amount of the loan or extension of credit.

Regulation W generally excludes all non-bank and non-savings association subsidiaries of banks from treatment as affiliates, except to the extent that the Federal Reserve Board decides to treat these subsidiaries as affiliates.

FIRREA

Under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”), a depository institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (“FDIC”) can be held liable for any loss incurred by, or reasonably expected to be incurred by, the FDIC in connection with (i) the default of a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution or (ii) any assistance provided by the FDIC to a commonly controlled FDIC-insured depository institution in danger of default. These provisions have commonly been referred to as FIRREA’s “cross guarantee” provisions. Further, under FIRREA, the failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank to a variety of enforcement remedies available to federal regulatory authorities.

FIRREA also imposes certain independent appraisal requirements upon a bank’s real estate lending activities and further imposes certain loan-to-value restrictions on a bank’s real estate lending activities. The bank regulators have promulgated regulations in these areas.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FDICIA

ThePursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) among other things requires, each federal banking agencies to broadenagency has promulgated regulations, specifying the scope of regulatory corrective action taken with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirementslevels at which a financial institution would be considered “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized,” and to take suchcertain mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions promptlybased on the capital level of the institution. To qualify to engage in orderfinancial activities under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, all depository institutions must be “well capitalized.” The financial holding company of a national bank will be put under directives to minimize losses toraise its capital levels or divest its activities if the FDIC. Under FDICIA, federal banking agencies have established five capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, and “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized”.depository institution falls from that level.

UnderThe OCC’s regulations adopted pursuant toimplementing these provisions forof FDICIA provide that an institution towill be well capitalizedclassified as “well capitalized” if it must have(i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 1010.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier I1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 66.0 percent, and(iii) has a Tier I1 leverage ratio of at least 55.0 percent, and not(iv) meets certain other requirements. An institution will be subject to any specific capital order or directive. For an institution to be adequately capitalized,classified as “adequately capitalized” if it must have(i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 88.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier I1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 44.0 percent, and(iii) has a Tier I1 leverage ratio of (a) at least 44.0 percent (oror (b) at least 3.0 percent if the institution was rated 1 in some cases 3 percent). Underits most recent examination, and (iv) does not meet the regulations, andefinition of “well capitalized.” An institution will be deemed to be undercapitalizedclassified as “undercapitalized” if the bankit (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio that isof less than 88.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier I1 risk-based capital ratio that is less than 4 percent or a Tier I leverage ratio of less than 44.0 percent, (oror (iii) has a Tier 1 leverage ratio of (a) less than 4.0 percent or (b) less than 3.0 percent if the institution was rated 1 in some cases 3 percent).

its most recent examination. An institution will be deemed to be significantly undercapitalizedclassified as “significantly undercapitalized” if the bankit (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio that isof less than 66.0 percent, (ii) has a Tier I1 risk-based capital ratio that isof less than 33.0 percent, or (iii) has a Tier I1 leverage ratio of less than 3 percent and3.0 percent. An institution will be deemed to be critically undercapitalizedclassified as “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets ratio that is equal to or less than 22.0 percent. An insured depository institution may be deemed to be in a lower capitalization category if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating. The OCC has established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank effective as of December 31, 2009: Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital of 10.0 percent, Total Risk-Based Capital of 12.0 percent and Tier 1 Leverage Capital of 8.0 percent. Similar categories apply to bank holding companies. At December 31, 2009, the Bank’s capital ratios were all above the minimum levels required, other than the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio, which was slightly below the 8.0 percent established by the OCC for the Bank.

In addition, significant provisions of FDICIA also directs that eachrequired federal banking agency prescriberegulators to impose standards for depository institutionsin a number of other important areas to assure bank safety and depository institution holding companies relating tosoundness, including internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, credit underwriting, asset growth, compensation, loan documentation credit underwriting,and interest rate exposure, asset growth,exposure. Under the MOU between the Bank and the OCC, the bank has agreed to develop a maximum ratiothree year capital program, which will include specific plans for the maintenance of classified assets toadequate capital a minimum ratio of market value to book value for publicly traded shares (if feasible) and such other standards as the agency deems appropriate.

FDICIA also contains a variety of other provisions that could affect the operationsstrengthening of the Corporation, including reporting requirements, regulatory standardsBank’s capital structure to meet current and future needs.

Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

On November 21, 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule relating to the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (the “TLG Program”). The TLG Program was announced by the FDIC on October 14, 2008, to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system. Under the original TLG Program the FDIC would guarantee, through the earlier of maturity or June 30, 2012, certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by participating institutions on or after October 14, 2008, and before June 30, 2009 (the “Debt Guarantee Program”). The Debt Guarantee Program was extended for real estate lending, “truth in savings” provisions,senior unsecured debt issued after April 1, 2009 and before October 31, 2009, and maturing on or after December 31, 2012. On October 20, 2009, the requirement that depositoryFDIC established a limited, six-month emergency guarantee facility upon expiration of the Debt Guarantee Program. Under this emergency guarantee facility, certain participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period starting October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had no senior unsecured debt scheduled to mature on or before April 30, 2010.

The other provision of the TLG Program provided full FDIC deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, NOW accounts paying less than 0.5 percent interest per annum and certain types of interest paying attorney trust accounts held at participating FDIC-insured institutions give 90 days notice to customers and regulatory authorities before closing any branch, limitations on credit exposure between banks, restrictions on loans to a bank’s insiders and guidelines governing regulatory examinations.originally

5


TABLE OF CONTENTS

through December 31, 2009 (the “Transaction Account Guarantee Program”). The Transaction Account Guarantee Program has been extended to June 30, 2010. Entities that wish to continue their participation in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program during the extension need not take any additional action. After December 31, 2009, those institutions that have not opted out of the extension will be charged an annualized rate according to the institutions risk category. The assessments will be paid each quarter and will be based on amounts over $250,000 for the portion of the quarter that the institution is assigned to the risk category. The Bank has elected to continue participation in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program.

Deposit Insurance Fundsand Premiums

The Corporation is a memberSubstantially all of the deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“BIF”DIF”) of the FDIC.FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The FDIC also maintains anotherutilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance fund,premiums based upon a risk matrix that takes into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating, known as a “CAMEL rating”. On December 16, 2008, the Savings Association Insurance FundFDIC adopted a final rule increasing risk-based assessment rates uniformly by 7 basis points (7 cents for every $100 of deposits), on an annual basis, for the first quarter of 2009. Subsequently on April 1, 2009, the FDIC issued rules which attempted to improve the methodology of the assessment system by differentiating risk among insured institutions.

On May 22, 2009, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a special assessment on the entire banking industry. The special assessment was calculated as 5 basis points times each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier I capital as reported in the report of condition of June 30, 2009 and would not exceed ten times the institutions assessment base for the second quarter 2009 risk-based assessment. This special assessment, which totaled $1.2 million, was collected on September 30, 2009. Including this special assessment, the Bank paid a total of $2.1 million in FDIC assessments in 2009.

On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted the final rule which required insured depository institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 through the fourth quarter of 2012. An institution’s prepaid assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010 will be determined by multiplying the total base assessment rate that the institution would have paid for the third quarter of 2009 times the corresponding prepaid assessment base for each quarter. For each quarter of the prepayment period, an institution’s prepaid assessment base will be calculated by increasing its third quarter 2009 assessment base at an annual rate of 5 percent. An institution’s prepaid assessment for each quarter of 2011 and 2012 will be determined by multiplying its prepaid assessment rate plus .75 basis points times the corresponding prepaid assessment base for each quarter. On December 30, 2009, the Corporation remitted an FDIC prepayment in the amount of $5.7 million.

The enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“SAIF”EESA”), which primarily covers temporarily raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. The temporary increase in deposit insurance coverage became effective on October 3, 2008. On May 20, 2009, the temporary increase to $250,000 per depositor was extended through December 31, 2013. On January 1, 2014, deposit insurance coverage will return to $100,000.

In addition to deposit insurance assessments, the FDIC is required to continue to collect from institutions payments for the servicing of obligations of the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) that were issued in connection with the resolution of savings and loan association deposits but also covers deposits that are acquired byassociations, so long as such obligations remain outstanding. The Corporation paid a BIF-insured institution from a savings and loan association. AsFICO premium of the most recent quarterly assessment preformed by the FDIC, the Corporation had approximately $699.0 million of deposits subject to assessment at December 31, 2007, with respect to which it pays SAIF FICO assessments.$82,000 in 2009.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 became effective in early 2000. The Modernization Act:

allows bank holding companies meeting management, capital, and Community Reinvestment Act standards to engage in a substantially broader range of non-banking activities than previously was permissible, including insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies; if a bank holding company elects to become a financial holding company, it files a certification, effective in 30 days, and thereafter may engage in certain financial activities without further approvals;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

allows insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks;
removes various restrictions that previously applied to bank holding company ownership of securities firms and mutual fund advisory companies; and
establishes the overall regulatory structure applicable to bank holding companies that also engage in insurance and securities operations.

The Modernization Act also modified other financial laws, including laws related to financial privacy and community reinvestment.

Community Reinvestment Act

Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), as implemented by OCC regulations, a national bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the OCC, in connection with its examination of a national bank, to assess the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such bank.

USA PatriotPATRIOT Act

In response to the events of September 11, 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”), was signed into law on October 26, 2001. The USA PATRIOT Act gives the federal government powers to address terrorist threats through domestic security measures, surveillance powers, information sharing, and anti-money laundering requirements. By way of amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA PATRIOT Act encourages information sharing among bank regulatory agencies and law enforcement bodies. Further, certain provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial institutions, including banks, thrifts, brokers, dealers, credit unions, money transfer agents and parties registered under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Among other requirements, the USA PATRIOT Act imposes the following requirements with respect to financial institutions:

All financial institutions must establish anti-money laundering programs that include, at a minimum: (i) internal policies, procedures, and controls; (ii) specific designation of an anti-money laundering compliance officer; (iii) ongoing employee training programs; and (iv) an independent audit function to test the anti-money laundering program.

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Secretary of the Department of Treasury, in conjunction with other bank regulators, is authorized to issue regulations that provide for minimum standards with respect to customer identification at the time new accounts are opened.
Financial institutions that establish, maintain, administer, or manage private banking accounts or correspondence accounts in the United States for non-United States persons or their representatives (including foreign individuals visiting the United States) are required to establish appropriate, specific and, where necessary, enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls designed to detect and report money laundering.
Financial institutions are prohibited from establishing, maintaining, administering or managing correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks (foreign banks that do not have a physical presence in any country), and will be subject to certain record keeping obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign banks.
Bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company’s effectiveness in combating money laundering when ruling on Federal Reserve Act and Bank Merger Act applications.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The stated goals of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOA”) are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties by publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.

The SOA generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

The SOA includes specific disclosure requirements and corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC. The SOA addresses, among other matters:

Audit committees for all reporting companies;
Certification of certain publicly filed documents by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer;
The forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuer’s securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve month period following initial publication of financial statements that later require restatement;
A prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black out periods;
Disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions;
A prohibition on personal loans to directors and officers (subject to certain exceptions, including exceptions which permit under certain circumstances described below, loans by financial institutions to their directors and officers);
Expedited filing requirements for Form 4’s;
Disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for a change in or waiver of such code;
“Real time” filing of periodic reports;
The formation of a public accounting oversight board;
Auditor independence; and
Various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws.

Legislation Implemented in Response to Recent Periods of Economic Turmoil

In response to recent unprecedented market turmoil, EESA was enacted on October 3, 2008. EESA authorizes the U.S. Treasury Department (the “treasury”) to provide up to $700 billion in funding for the financial services industry. Pursuant to the EESA, the Treasury was initially authorized to use $350 billion for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”). Of this amount, the Treasury allocated $250 billion to the TARP Capital Purchase Program. On January 15, 2009, the second $350 billion of TARP monies was released to the Treasury. As described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Treasury purchased $10,000,000 of the Parent Corporation’s non-convertible preferred stock (the “Preferred Shares”) under the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

7


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Participants in the TARP Capital Purchase Program were required to accept several compensation-related limitations associated with this Program. In January 2009, five executive officers of the Corporation (Messrs. Weagley, Abrahamian, Shapiro and Boylan and Ms. Wunder) agreed in writing to accept the compensation standards in existence at that time under the Capital Purchase Program and thereby cap or eliminate some of their contractual or legal rights. The provisions agreed to were as follows:

•No Golden Parachute Payments.  The term “golden parachute payment” under the TARP Capital Purchase Program (as distinguished from the definition under the Stimulus Act referred to below) refers to a severance payment resulting from involuntary termination of employment, or from bankruptcy of the employer, that exceeds three times the terminated employee’s average annual base salary over the five years prior to termination. The Corporation’s senior executive officers have agreed to forego all golden parachute payments for as long as they remain “senior executive officers” (the CEO, the CFO and the next three highest-paid executive officers) of the Corporation and the Treasury continues to hold the equity or debt securities that the Parent Corporation issued to it under the TARP Capital Purchase Program (the period during which the Treasury holds those securities is referred to herein as the “CPP Covered Period.”).
•Clawback of Bonus and Incentive Compensation if Based on Certain Material Inaccuracies.  Our senior executive officers agreed to a “clawback provision”. Any bonus or incentive compensation paid to them during the CPP Covered Period is subject to recovery or “clawback” by the Corporation if the payments were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria. The senior executive officers acknowledged that each of the Corporation’s compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including golden parachute, severance and employment agreements) (collectively, “Benefit Plans”) with respect to them was deemed amended to the extent necessary to give effect to such clawback and the restriction on golden parachute payments.
•No Compensation Arrangements That Encourage Excessive Risks.  The Corporation is required to review its Benefit Plans to ensure that they do not encourage senior executive officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Corporation. To the extent any such review requires revisions to any Benefit Plan with respect to the senior executive officers, they agreed to negotiate such changes promptly and in good faith.

During the CPP Covered Period, the Corporation is not permitted to take federal income tax deductions for compensation paid to the senior executive officers in excess of $500,000 per year, subject to certain exceptions.

On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Stimulus Act”) was enacted. The Stimulus Act contains several provisions designed to establish executive compensation and governance standards for financial institutions (such as the Corporation) that received or will receive financial assistance under TARP. In certain instances, the Stimulus Act modified the compensation-related limitations contained in the TARP Capital Purchase Program; in addition, the Stimulus Act created additional compensation-related limitations and directed the Treasury to establish standards for executive compensation applicable to participants in TARP. In their January 2009 agreements, the Corporation’s executives did not waive their rights with respect to the provisions implemented by the Stimulus Act; other employees now covered by these provisions were not asked and did not agree to waive their rights. The compensation-related limitations applicable to the Corporation which have been added or modified by the Stimulus Act are as follows, which provisions are expected to be included in standards established by the Treasury:

•No Severance Payments.  Under the Stimulus Act, the term “golden parachutes” is defined to include any severance payment resulting from involuntary termination of employment, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued. Under the Stimulus Act, the Corporation is prohibited from making any severance payment to its “senior executive officers” (defined in the Stimulus Act as the five highest paid senior executive officers) and the Corporation’s next five most highly compensated employees during the period that the Preferred Shares are outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•Recovery of Incentive Compensation if Based on Certain Material Inaccuracies.  The Stimulus Act contains the “clawback provision” discussed above but extends its application to any bonus awards and other incentive compensation paid to any of the Corporation’s senior executive officers and the next 20 most highly compensated employees during the period that the Preferred Shares are outstanding that is later found to have been based on materially inaccurate financial statements or other materially inaccurate measurements of performance.
•No Compensation Arrangements That Encourage Earnings Manipulation.  Under the Stimulus Act, during the period that the Preferred Shares are outstanding, the Corporation is prohibited from entering into compensation arrangements that encourage manipulation of the reported earnings of the Corporation to enhance the compensation of any of the Corporation’s employees.
•Limit on Incentive Compensation.  The Stimulus Act contains a provision that prohibits the payment or accrual of any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation to the Corporation’s highest paid employee while the Preferred Shares are outstanding other than awards of long-term restricted stock that (i) do not fully vest while the Preferred Shares are outstanding, (ii) have a value not greater than one-third of the total annual compensation of such employee and (iii) are subject to such other restrictions as will be determined by the Treasury. The prohibition on bonuses does not preclude payments required under written employment contracts entered into on or prior to February 11, 2009.
•Compensation Committee Functions.  The Stimulus Act requires that the Parent Corporation’s Compensation Committee be comprised solely of independent directors and that it meet at least semiannually to discuss and evaluate the Corporation’s employee compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed to the Corporation from such compensation plans.
•Compliance Certifications.  The Stimulus Act requires an annual written certification by the Parent Corporation’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer with respect to the Corporation’s compliance with the provisions of the Stimulus Act.
•Treasury Review of Excessive Bonuses Previously Paid.  The Stimulus Act directs the Treasury to review all compensation paid to the Corporation’s senior executive officers and its next 20 most highly compensated employees to determine whether any such payments were inconsistent with the purposes of the Stimulus Act or were otherwise contrary to the public interest. If the Treasury makes such a finding, the Treasury is directed to negotiate with the Parent Corporation and the applicable employee for appropriate reimbursements to the federal government with respect to the compensation and bonuses.
•Say on Pay.  Under the Stimulus Act, the Corporation is required to have an advisory “say on pay vote” by the shareholders on executive compensation at the Corporation’s shareholder meetings during the period that the Preferred Shares are outstanding. This requirement applied to the Corporation’s 2009 annual meeting of shareholders and will apply to the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders.

Proposed Legislation

From time to time proposals are made in the U.S. Congress and before various bank regulatory authorities, which would alter the policies of and place restrictions on different types of banking operations. It is impossible to predict the impact, if any, of potential legislative trends on the business of the Corporation and the Bank.

Loans to Related Parties

The Corporation’s authority to extend credit to its directors and executive officers, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the requirements of the National Bank Act, the SOASarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Regulation O of the FRB.Federal Reserve Bank. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders (i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other


TABLE OF CONTENTS

unfavorable features and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the amount of the Corporation’s capital. In addition, the Corporation’s Board of Directors must approve extensions of credit in excess of certain limits. Under the SOA, the Corporation and its subsidiaries, other than Union Center National Bank, may not extend or arrange for any personal loans to its directors and executive officers.

Dividend Restrictions

MostThe Parent Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. Virtually all of the revenue of the Parent Corporation available for payment of dividends on its capital stock will result from amounts paid to the Parent Corporation by the Bank. ThereAll such dividends are subject to various limitations imposed by federal laws and by regulations and policies adopted by federal regulatory agencies. As a number of statutory and regulatory restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends by national banks and bank, holding companies. First, the Bank must obtainmay not pay a dividend if it would impair the approvalcapital of the OCCBank. Furthermore, prior approval by the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the total of dividends declared by the Bank in anya calendar year will exceedexceeds the total of the Bank’s net profits (as defined and interpreted by regulation) for that year andcombined with the retained profits (as defined) for the two preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus. Second,years. The Company’s current MOU provides that the Bank cannot pay dividends unless, afterdeclare a dividend without the prior approval of the OCC.

On January 9, 2009, as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Parent Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) and a Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms attached thereto (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with the Treasury, pursuant to which (i) the Parent Corporation issued and sold, and the Treasury purchased, 10,000 shares of the Parent Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000,000 in cash, and (ii) the Parent Corporation issued to the Treasury a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 173,410 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. The Securities Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of such dividends capital would be unimpaired and remaining surplus would equal 100%on the common stock. Specifically, the Parent Corporation is unable to declare dividend payments on the common stock (and certain preferred stock if the Corporation issues additional series of capital. Third,preferred stock) if the authorityParent Corporation is in arrears in the payment of Federal regulatorsdividends on the Preferred Shares. Further, until the third anniversary of the investment or when all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred, the Parent Corporation is not permitted to monitorincrease the levelsamount of capital maintainedthe quarterly cash dividend above $0.09 per share, which was the amount of the last regular dividend declared by the Parent Corporation andprior to October 14, 2008.

If, in the Bank (see Item 7opinion of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the discussion of FDICIA above), as well as the authority of such regulatorsOCC, a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to prohibitengage in an unsafe or unsound practices,practice (which could include the payment of dividends), the OCC may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from such practice or, as a result of an unrelated practice, require the bank to limit dividends in the amount of dividends whichfuture. The FRB has similar authority with respect to bank holding companies. In addition, the Parent CorporationFRB and the Bank may pay.OCC have issued policy statements which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Regulatory pressures to reclassify and charge-offcharge off loans and to establish additional loan loss reserves also can have the effect of reducing current operating earnings and thus impacting an institution’s ability to pay dividends. RegulatoryFurther, as described herein, the regulatory authorities have indicated thatestablished guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by a bank or bank holding companies,company under their jurisdiction. Compliance with the standards set forth in these policy statements and guidelines could limit the amount of dividends which the Parent Corporation and the Bank may pay. Under FDICIA, banking institutions which are experiencing high levels of non-performing loans and loan charge-offs, should review their dividend policies. Reference is also madedeemed to Note 18 of the Notes to the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements and to Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.be “undercapitalized” will, in most instances, be prohibited from paying dividends.

Lending Guidelines; Real Estate Credit Management

Credit risks are an inherent part of the lending function. The Corporation has set in place specific policies and guidelines to limit credit risks. The following describes the Corporation’s credit management policy and describesidentifies certain risk elements in its earning assets portfolio.

Credit Management

The maintenance of comprehensive and effective credit policies is a paramount objective of the Corporation. Credit procedures are enforced by the department heads of the different lending units and are maintained at the senior administrative level as well as through internal control procedures.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Prior to extending credit, the Corporation’s credit policy generally requires a review of the borrower’s credit history, repayment capacity, collateral and purpose of each loan. Requests for most commercial and consumer loans are to be accompanied by financial statements and other relevant financial data for evaluation. After the granting of a loan or lending commitment, this financial data is typically updated and evaluated by the credit staff on a periodic basis for the purpose of identifying potential problems. Construction financing requires a periodic submission by the borrowers of sales/leasing status reports regarding their projects, as well

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

as, in somemost cases, inspections of the project sites by independent engineering firms and/or independent consultants. Advances are normally made only upon the satisfactory completion of periodic phases of construction.

Certain lending authorities are granted to loan officers based upon each officer’s position and experience. However, large dollar loans and lending lines are reported to and are subject to the approval of the Bank’s loan committees and/or board of directors. Either the president or another senior officerChairman of the BankBoard or President chairs the loan committees.

The Corporation has established its own internal loan-to-value (“LTV”) limits for real estate loans. In general, except as described below, these internal limits are not permitted to exceed the following supervisory limits:

 
Loan Category Loan-to-Value
Limit
Raw Land  65 %% 
Land Development  75 %% 
Commercial, Multifamily and Other Non-residential construction  80 %% 
Construction: One to Four Family Residential  85 %% 
Improved Property (excluding One to Four Family Residential)  85 %% 
Owner-Occupied One to Four Family and Home Equity *Equity*  90 %% 

*For a permanent mortgage or home equity loan on owner occupied one to four family residential property with an LTV that exceeds 90 percent at origination, private mortgage insurance or readily marketable collateral is to be obtained. “Readily marketable collateral” means insured deposits, financial instruments and bullion in which the bank has a perfected interest. Financial instruments and bullion are to be salable under ordinary circumstances with reasonable promptness at a fair market value.

It may be appropriate in individual cases to originate loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of the supervisory LTV limits, based on support provided by other credit factors. The President of the Bank must approve such non-conforming loans. The Bank must identify all non-conforming loans and their aggregate amount must be reported at least quarterly to the Directors’ Loan Committee. Non-conforming loans should not exceed 100% of capital, or 30% with respect to non one to four family residential loans. At present, management is unaware of any exceptions to supervisory LTV limits.

Collateral margin guidelines are based on cost, market or other appraised value to maintain a reasonable amount of collateral protection in relation to the inherent risk in the loan. This does not mitigate the fundamental analysis of cash flow from the conversion of assets in the normal course of business or from operations to repay the loan. It is merely designed to provide a cushion to minimize the risk of loss if the ultimate collection of the loan becomes dependent on the liquidation of security pledged.

The Corporation also seeks to minimize lending risk through loan diversification. The composition of the Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio reflects and is highly dependent upon the economy and industrial make-up of the region it serves. Effective loan diversification spreads risk to many different industries, thereby reducing the impact of downturns in any specific industry on overall loan profitability.

Credit quality is monitored through an internal review process, which includes a credit Risk Grading System that facilitates the early detection of problem loans. Under this grading system, all commercial loans and commercial mortgage loans are graded in accordance with the risk characteristics inherent in each loan. Problem loans include non-accrual loans, and loans which conform to the regulatory definitions of criticized and classified loans.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

A Problem Asset Report is prepared monthly and is examined by the senior management of the Bank, the Corporation’s Loan and Discount Committee and Board of Directors. This review is designed to enable management to take such actions as are considered necessary to identify and remedy problems on a timely basis.

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Bank’s internal loan review process is complimentedcomplemented by an independent loan review conducted throughout the year, under the mandate and approval of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. In addition, regularly scheduled audits performed by the Bank’s internal audit function are designed to ensure the integrity of the credit and risk monitoring systems currently in place.

Risk Elements

RiskThe risk elements identified by the Corporation include non-performing loans, loans past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments but not placed on a non-accrual status, potential problem loans, other real estate owned, net, and other non-performing interest-earning assets.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in Center Bancorp’sour common stock involves risks. Stockholders should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, before making any purchase or sale decisions regarding Center Bancorp’sour common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or operating results may be harmed. In that case, the trading price of Center Bancorp’sour common stock may decline, and stockholders may lose part or all of their investment in Center Bancorp’sour common stock.

We are required to take certain actions pursuant to our current MOU with the OCC, and lack of compliance could result in additional regulatory actions.

As described under “Item 1 — Business — Regulation of Bank Subsidiary,” the Bank is subject to a MOU with the OCC, pursuant to which it has agreed to take various actions to improve the Bank’s capital position and profitability. The OCC has also established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank than the regulatory minimums. While management is committed to addressing and resolving the issues raised by the OCC and has already initiated corrective actions to comply with various requirements of the MOU, no assurances can be given that the OCC will find the Bank’s compliance plan satisfactory, or that the Bank will not be subject to further supervisory action by the OCC. We may at some point need to raise additional capital to assure compliance with mandated capital ratios and to support our continued growth. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets at that time, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to comply with applicable capital requirements and to further expand our operations through internal growth or acquisitions could be materially impaired.

Recent negative developments in the financial services industry and U.S. and global credit markets may continue to adversely impact our operations and results.

The general economic downturn continued throughout 2009 and is continuing into 2010. Loan portfolio performances have deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. The competition for our deposits has increased significantly due to liquidity concerns at many of these same institutions. Stock prices of bank holding companies, like ours, have been negatively affected by the current condition of the financial markets, as has our ability, if needed, to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets compared to recent years. As a result, there is a potential for new federal or state laws and regulations regarding lending and funding practices and liquidity standards, and financial institution regulatory agencies are expected to be very aggressive in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including the expected issuance of many formal enforcement actions. Negative developments in the financial services industry and the impact of new legislation in response to those developments could negatively impact our operations by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and adversely impact our financial performance. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on us and others in the financial institutions industry. In particular, we may face the following risks in connection with these events:

we potentially face increased regulation of our industry and compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

customer demand for loans secured by real estate could be reduced due to weaker economic conditions, an increase in unemployment, a decrease in real estate values or an increase in interest rates;
the process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic conditions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans; the level of uncertainty concerning economic conditions may adversely affect the accuracy of our estimates which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the process;
the value of the portfolio of investment securities that we hold may be adversely affected; and
we may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums because market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits

We are subject to interest rate risk and variations in interest rates may negatively impact our financial performance.

We are unable to predict actual fluctuations of market interest rates with complete accuracy. Rate fluctuations are affected by many factors, including:

Inflation;inflation;
Recession;recession;
Aa rise in unemployment;
Tighteningtightening money supply; and
Domesticdomestic and international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets.

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce profits. We expect that we will continue to realize income from the differential or “spread” between the interest we earn on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and the interest we pay on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. At present, we are somewhat vulnerable to increases in interest rates because if rates increase significantly, our interest-earning assets may not reprice as rapidly as our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect our net interest spread, asset quality, levels of prepayments and cash flows as well as the market value of our securities portfolio and overall profitability.

External factors, many of which we cannot control, may result in liquidity concerns for us.

Liquidity risk is the potential that Union Center National Bank may be unable to meet its obligations as they come due, capitalize on growth opportunities as they arise, or pay regular dividends because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding in a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances.

Liquidity is required to fund various obligations, including credit commitments to borrowers, mortgage and other loan originations, withdrawals by depositors, repayment of borrowings, operating expenses, capital expenditures and dividend payments to shareholders.

Liquidity is derived primarily from deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; principal and interest payments on investment securities; sale, maturity and prepayment of investment securities; net cash provided from operations, and access to other funding sources.

Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity due to market factors or an adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole as the turmoil faced by banking organizations in the domestic and worldwide credit markets continues. Over the last several years, the financial services industry and the credit markets generally have been materially and adversely affected by significant declines in


TABLE OF CONTENTS

asset values and by a lack of liquidity. The liquidity issues have been particularly acute for regional and community banks, as many of the larger financial institutions have significantly curtailed their lending to regional and community banks to reduce their exposure to the risks of other banks. In addition, many of the larger correspondent lenders have reduced or even eliminated federal funds lines for their correspondent customers. Furthermore, regional and community banks generally have less access to the capital markets than do the national and super-regional banks because of their smaller size and limited analyst coverage. Any decline in available funding could adversely impact our ability to originate loans, invest in securities, meet our expenses, or fulfill obligations such as repaying our borrowings or meeting deposit withdrawal demands, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition.

The extensive regulation and supervision to which we are subject impose substantial restrictions on our business.

Center Bancorp Inc., primarily through its principal subsidiary, Union Center National Bank, and certain non-bank subsidiaries, are subject to extensive regulation and supervision. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. Such laws are not designed to protect our shareholders. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Union Center National Bank is also subject to a number of federal laws, which, among other things, require it to lend to various sectors of the economy and population, and establish and maintain comprehensive programs relating to anti-money laundering and customer identification. The United States Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes, especially for the TARP Capital Purchase Program (in which the Parent Corporation is a participant). Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputational damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because of our participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, we are subject to several restrictions, including restrictions on our ability to declare or pay dividends and repurchase our shares, as well as restrictions on our executive compensation.

As a result of our participation in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, our ability to declare or pay dividends on any of our capital stock is subject to restrictions. Specifically, we are unable to declare dividend payments on common, junior preferred orpari passu preferred shares if we are in arrears in the payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares. Further, until the third anniversary of the investment or when all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred, we are not permitted to increase the cash dividends on our common stock without the U.S. Treasury’s approval. Additionally, our ability to repurchase our shares of outstanding common stock is restricted. The U.S. Treasury’s consent generally is required for us to make any stock repurchase until the third anniversary of the investment by the U.S. Treasury unless all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred. Further, common, junior preferred orpari passu preferred shares may not be repurchased if we are in arrears in the payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares. These restrictions, as well as the dilutive effect of the warrants that we issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Capital Purchase Program, may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

Pursuant to the terms by which we participated in the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Agreement and the terms of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, we and several of our senior employees are subject to substantial limitations on executive compensation and are subject to relatively new corporate governance standards. Such requirements may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain senior officers and employees who are critical to the operation of our business.

The documents that we executed with the U.S. Treasury when it purchased our Preferred Shares allow it to unilaterally change the terms of the Preferred Shares or impose additional requirements on the Corporation if there is a change in law. These changes or additional requirements could restrict our ability to conduct


TABLE OF CONTENTS

business, could subject us to additional cost and expense or could change the terms of the Preferred Shares to the detriment of our common shareholders. While it may be possible for us to redeem the Preferred Shares in the event that the U.S. Treasury imposes any changes or additional requirements that we believe are detrimental, there can be no assurances that our federal regulator will approve such redemption or that we will have the ability to implement such redemption, especially in light of regulatory requirements imposed upon financial institutions seeking to redeem TARP securities.

Current levels of volatility in the capital markets are unprecedented and may adversely impact our operations and results.

The capital markets have been experiencing unprecedented volatility for more than two years. Such negative developments and disruptions have resulted in uncertainty in the financial market in general with the expectation of a continuing general economic downturn which is continuing in 2010. Bank and bank holding company stock prices have been negatively affected, as has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets compared to recent years. If current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not experience an adverse effect, which may be material, on our business, financial condition and results of operations or our ability to access capital.

We must effectively manage our credit risk.

There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks inherent in dealing with particular borrowers, risks of nonpayment, risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions. We attempt to minimize our credit risk through prudent loan application approval procedures, careful monitoring of the concentration of our loans within specific industries, a centralized credit administration department and periodic independent reviews of outstanding loans by our loan review department. However, we cannot assure you that such approval and monitoring procedures will reduce these credit risks.

Our loan portfolio includes commercial real estate loans, which involve risks specific to real estate value.

Commercial real estate loans were $405.9 million, or approximately 56.7 percent of our total loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2009. Many of these loans are extended to small and medium-sized businesses. The market value of real estate can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Although many such loans are secured by real estate as a secondary form of collateral, continued adverse developments affecting real estate values in our market area could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the control of the borrower or lender could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties. If the loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled and the value of the real estate has been significantly impaired, then we may not be able to recover the full contractual amount of principal and interest that we anticipated at the time of originating the loan, which could cause us to increase our provision for loan losses and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

We may incur impairments to goodwill.

We review our goodwill at least annually. Significant negative industry or economic trends, reduced estimates of future cash flows or disruptions to our business, could indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Our valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and to rely on projections of future operating performance. We operate in a competitive environment and projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from actual results. Additionally, if our analysis results in an impairment to its goodwill, we would be required to record a non-cash charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which such impairment is determined to exist. Any such change could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our stock price.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Union Center National Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to regulatory limitations, which, to the extent that our holding company requires such dividends in the future, may affect our holding company’s ability to honor its obligations and pay dividends.

As a bank holding company, we areCenter Bancorp, Inc. is a separate legal entity from Union Center National Bank and its subsidiaries and dodoes not have significant operations of our own.operations. We currently depend on Union Center National Bank’s cash and liquidity to pay our operating expenses and dividends to shareholders. We cannot assure you that in the future Union Center National Bank will have the capacity to pay the necessary dividends and that we will not require dividends from Union Center National Bank to satisfy our obligations. Various statutes and regulations limit the availability of dividends from Union Center National Bank. It is possible, depending upon our and Union Center National Bank’s financial condition and other factors, that bank regulators could assert that payment of dividends or other payments by Union Center National Bank are an unsafe or unsound practice. In the event that Union Center National Bank is unable to pay dividends, we may not be able to service our obligations, as they become due, or pay dividends on our commoncapital stock. Consequently, the inability to receive dividends from Union Center National Bank could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects.

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS Pursuant to the MOU between Union Center National Bank and the OCC, the Bank may not declare dividends without the prior approval of the OCC.

Union Center National Bank’s allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

Like all financial institutions, Union Center National Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. If Union Center National Bank’s allowance for loan losses is not adequate to cover actual loan losses;losses, future provisions for loan losses could materially and adversely affect our operating results. Union Center National Bank’s allowance for loan losses is determined by analyzing historical loan losses, current trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, plans for problem loan resolution, the opinions of its regulators, changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio and industry information. Union Center National Bank also considers the impact of economic events, the outcome of which is uncertain. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond our control and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review Union Center National Bank’s loans and allowance for loan losses. While we believe that Union Center National Bank’s allowance for loan losses in relation to its current loan portfolio is adequate to cover current losses, we cannot assure you that Union Center National Bank will not need to increase its allowance for loan losses or that regulators will not require it to increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect our earnings and profitability.

Union Center National Bank is subject to various lending and other economic risks that could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Changes in economic conditions, particularly ana significant worsening of the current economic slowdown,environment, could hurt Union Center National Bank’s business. Union Center National Bank’s business is directly affected by political and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond our control. Deterioration in economic conditions, particularly within New Jersey, could result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt our business materially:

Loanloan delinquencies may increase;
Problemproblem assets and foreclosures may increase;
Demanddemand for our products and services may decline; and
Collateralcollateral for loans made by Union Center National Bank may decline in value, in turn reducing Union Center National Bank’s clients’ borrowing power.

A downturnFurther deterioration in the real estate market, particularly in New Jersey, could hurt our business. If there is a significant decline inAs real estate values in New Jersey the collateral for Union Center National Bank’s loans will provide less security. As a result, Union Center National Bank’sdecline, our ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate would be diminished, and Union Center National Bank would be more likely tois reduced, which increases the possibility that we may suffer losses on defaulted loans.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Union Center National Bank may suffer losses in its loan portfolio despite its underwriting practices.

Union Center National Bank seeks to mitigate the risks inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to specific underwriting practices. Although we believe that Union Center National Bank’s underwriting criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans that it makes, Union Center National Bank may incur losses on loans that meet its underwriting criteria, and these losses may exceed the amounts set aside as reserves in its allowance for loan losses.

Union Center National Bank faces strong competition from other financial institutions, financial service companies and other organizations offering services similar to the services that Union Center National Bank provides.

Many competitors offer the same types of loans and banking services that Union Center National Bank offers or similar types of such services. These competitors include other national banks, savings associations, regional banks and other community banks. Union Center National Bank also faces competition from many other types of financial institutions, including finance companies, brokerage firms, insurance companies, credit

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

unions, mortgage banks and other financial intermediaries. In this regard, Union Center National Bank’s competitors include other state and national banks and major financial companies whose greater resources may afford them a marketplace advantage by enabling them to maintain numerous banking locations, offer a broader suite of services and mount extensive promotional and advertising campaigns. Our inability to compete effectively wouldmay adversely affect our business.

If we do not successfully integrate any entitiespursue acquisitions, we may heighten the risks to our operations and financial condition.

To the extent that we undertake acquisitions or new branch openings, we may acquireexperience the effects of higher operating expenses relative to operating income from the new operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our levels of reported net income, return on average equity and return on average assets. Other effects of engaging in such growth strategies may include potential diversion of our management’s time and attention and general disruption to our business. To the extent that we grow through acquisitions and branch openings, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately and profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks and businesses involve similar risks to those commonly associated with branching, but may also involve additional risks, including:

potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of banks and businesses we acquire;
exposure to potential asset quality issues of the acquired bank or related business;
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and personnel of banks and businesses we acquire; and
the possible loss of key employees and customers of the banks and businesses we acquire.

Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future.

We expect that other banking and financial service companies, many of which have significantly greater resources than us, will compete with us in acquiring other financial institutions if we pursue such acquisitions. This competition could increase prices for potential acquisitions that we believe are attractive. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators will consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance and levels of goodwill when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and shareholders’ equity per share of our common stock.

Further increases in FDIC premiums could have a material adverse effect on our future earnings.

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including Union Center National Bank. The FDIC charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund at an adequate level. In light of current economic conditions, the FDIC has increased its assessment rates and imposed special assessments. The FDIC may further increase these rates and impose additional special assessments in the future, the combined companywhich could have a material adverse effect on future earnings.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Declines in value may adversely impact our investment portfolio.

As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $298.1 million in available for sale investment securities. We may be required to record impairment charges on our investment securities if they suffer a decline in value that is considered other-than-temporary. Numerous factors, including lack of liquidity for re-sales of certain investment securities, absence of reliable pricing information for investment securities, adverse changes in business climate, adverse actions by regulators, or unanticipated changes in the competitive environment could have a negative effect on our investment portfolio in future periods. If an impairment charge is significant enough, it could affect the ability of Union Center National Bank to upstream dividends to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to pay dividends to shareholders and could also negatively impact our regulatory capital ratios.

Concern of customers over deposit insurance may cause a decrease in deposits.

With recent increased concerns about bank failures, customers increasingly are concerned about the extent to which their deposits are insured by the FDIC. Customers may withdraw deposits in an effort to ensure that the amount they have on deposit with their bank is fully insured. Decreases in deposits may adversely affected.affect our funding costs and net income.

We have a continuing need for technological change and we may not have the resources to effectively implement new technology.

The successfinancial services industry is constantly undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of our enterprise after acquisitions that we may consummate innew technology-driven products and services. In addition to better serving customers, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to reduce costs. Our future success will depend in part onupon our ability to integrateaddress the acquired entities intoneeds of our existing franchise, including,customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience as well as to create additional efficiencies in certain circumstances,our operations as we grow. We cannot provide you with assurance that we will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing such products and services to our customers.

System failure or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to unforeseen problems. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to centralize certain administrative functionsprotect our computer equipment against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and eliminate unnecessary duplicationother disruptive problems caused by hackers. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Computer break-ins, phishing and other functions. Wedisruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may experience difficultiesresult in accomplishing this integration or in effectively managingsignificant liability to us and may cause existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with us. A failure of the combined company. Any actual cost savings or revenue enhancements thatsecurity measures we may anticipate will dependuse could have a material adverse effect on future expense levelsour financial condition and operating results the timing of certain events and general industry, regulatory and business conditions. Many of these events will be beyond our control, and we cannot provide assurances that the integration of businesses that we may acquire will be successful.operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

NoneNone.

Item 2. Properties

The Bank’s operations are located at nine sites in Union County, New Jersey, consisting of five sites in Union Township, one in Springfield Township, one in Berkeley Heights, one in Vauxhall and one in Summit, New Jersey. The Bank also has fourthree sites in Morris County, New Jersey, consisting of one site in Madison, one site in Boonton/Mountain Lakes, and two sitesone site in Morristown, New Jersey. The principal office is located at 2455 Morris Avenue, Union, New Jersey. The principal office is a two story building constructed in 1993. On October 9, 2004, the Bank opened a 19,555 square foot office facility on Springfield Road in Union, New Jersey, which serves as the Bank’s Operations and Data Center. On October 1, 2004 the Corporation signed an agreement to purchase premises at 44 North Avenue, Cranford, New Jersey to be used to construct a full service branch facility. Subsequently, the Corporation exercised its option to cancel that contract on January 12, 2007. On February 27, 2008, the Corporation


TABLE OF CONTENTS

signed an agreement to lease premises at 105 North Avenue, Cranford, New Jersey to be used to construct a full service branch facility. Subsequently, the Corporation has notified the landlord that it wantswanted to terminate the commitment and expects that to be completed the termination in the first quarter of 2008. On October 28, 2005, the Corporation signed an agreement to lease a branch facility to be constructed at 209 Ridgedale Avenue, Florham Park, New Jersey. In September 2007, the Corporation reclassified the Florham Park office as held for sale real estate and has entered into a contract to sell that property. 2009.

The Corporation completed the sale of the property on February 29, 2008.

Six of the locations are owned by the Bank and seven of the locations are leased by the Bank. The lease of the Five Points Branch located at 356 Chestnut Street, Union, New Jersey, which was set to expire on November 30, 2007 under the original lease which expires in 2017, was renegotiated into a new lease on May 25, 2007 for a 20 year term with renewal options to commence upon completion of the office renovation. The Corporation is currently enlarging the building on that site and expects construction to be completed at the end of the second quarter of 2008, at which time the new lease would be effective. . The lease of the Career Center Branch located in Union High School expires October 31, 2008. The lease of the Madison office located at 300 Main Street, Madison, New Jersey expires June 6, 2010 and is subject to renewal atfollowing table sets forth certain information regarding the Bank’s option. The lease of the Millburn Mall Branch located at 2933 Vauxhall Road, Vauxhall, New Jersey expires January 31, 2013 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease on the Red Oak Banking Center located at 190 Park Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey expires November 1, 2008 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option for a renewal period of five years.. The Corporation has exercised its option to not renew this lease effective November 1, 2008 and has announced the closure of this location effective March 19, 2008. The lease of the Summit branch located at 392 Springfield Avenue, Summit, New Jersey expires March 31, 2021 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option. The lease for the Boonton/Mountain Lakes office located at Ely Place, Boonton, New Jersey expires August 29, 2021, and is subject to renewal at the Bank’sleased locations.

Branch LocationTerm
356 Chestnut Street, Union, New JerseyTerm expires in 2028 with renewal options
Career Center Branch located in
Union High School, Union, New Jersey		Term expired in October 2008, currently on month to month lease
300 Main Street, Madison, New JerseyTerm expires June 6, 2010 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option
2933 Vauxhall Road, Vauxhall,
New Jersey		Term expires January 31, 2013 and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option
392 Springfield Avenue, Summit,
New Jersey		Term expired March 31, 2009 and was subject to renewal at the Bank’s option; however, the Bank advised the landlord that it did not intend to renew this lease.
545 Morris Avenue, Summit, New JerseyTerm expires February 1, 2024, subject to renewal at the Bank’s option
Ely Place, Boonton, New JerseyTerm expires August 29, 2021, and is subject to renewal at the Bank’s option

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

option. The Bank operates a Drive In/Walk Up located at 2022 Stowe Street, Union, New Jersey, adjacent to a part of the Center Office facility. The Bank has fivethree off-site ATM locations. One at is located at Union Hospital, 100 Galloping Hill Road, Union, New Jersey, threeTwo are located at New Jersey Transit stations;stations and one is located at the Boys and Girls Club of Union, 1050 Jeanette Avenue, Union, New Jersey.

On January 12, 2010, the Bank entered into a sale/purchase agreement for its 1180 Springfield Road facility. Under the terms of the agreement the premises will be leased with an option to buy. The agreement is expected to be fully consummated in the second quarter of 2010.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In December 2009, the Corporation took steps to terminate a participation agreement with another New Jersey bank at December 31, 2009. Under the terms of the agreement, the participation ended on December 31, 2009, and, in the Corporation’s view, the lead bank is required to repurchase the remaining balance. The lead bank questioned our enforcement of the participation agreement. Therefore, the Corporation filed suit in Superior Court of New Jersey Chancery Division in Morris County, New Jersey, for the return of the outstanding principal and has reclassified the outstanding loan into other assets on its balance sheet.

Union Center has instituted a suit against Highlands State Bank (“Highlands”) in the Superior Court of New Jersey (Docket No. MRS-C-189-09). This litigation relates to a participating interest in a construction loan originated by Highlands. This loan was closed, and the participating interest (85%) was acquired, in 2007. Various causes of action are pleaded in this litigation by both parties, including claims for recovery of damages. The primary claim prosecuted by Union Center seeks a judicial determination that the Participation Agreement executed with Highlands was properly terminated in accordance with its terms on December 31, 2009 and that Highlands is obligated to return the unpaid balance of the loan funds advanced by Union Center during its participation in the loan. The primary claim presented by Highlands is that Union Center’s participation in the loan must continue until it is ultimately retired, which will probably result in a substantial loss that it is claimed must be shared by Union Center. This litigation is in its early stages. The initial pleadings have been filed and the discovery phase will now begin.

There are no other significant pending legal proceedings involving the Parent Corporation or the Bank other than those arising out of routine operations. Management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of such litigation will have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Parent Corporation and Bank on a consolidated basis. Such statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from this statement as a result of various factors, including the uncertainties arising in proving facts within the judicial process.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Corporation had no matter submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

Item 4A.3A. Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth the name and age of each executive officer of the Parent Corporation, the period during which each such person has served as an officer of the Parent Corporation or the Bank and each such person’s business experience (including all positions with the Parent Corporation and the Bank) for the past five years:

  
Name and Age Officer Since Business Experience
Anthony C. Weagley
Age – 4648		 1996 the Parent Corporation
1985 the Bank		 President and Chief Executive Officer of the Parent Corporation (April 2008 – Present); President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Parent Corporation (August 2007 – March 2008); President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank (March 2008 – Present); President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank (August 2007 – February 2008); Vice President & Treasurer of the Parent Corporation (1996 – August 2007); Senior Vice President & Cashier of the Bank (1996 – August 2007),; Vice President & Cashier of the Bank (1991 – 1996) and Assistant
William Boylan
Age – 45		2008 the Parent Corporation 2007 the BankVice President (1991of the Parent Corporation (July 2008 – 1997)Present); Senior Vice President of the Bank (January 2008 – Present); Vice President of the Bank (December 2007 – January 2008); Senior Vice President, Northern State Bank (August 2006 – November 2007); and Senior Vice President, NVE Bank (1997 – July 2006)
Mark S. Cardone
Age – 47		2001 the Parent Corporation
2001 the Bank		Vice President of the Parent Corporation and Senior Vice President & Branch Administrator of the Bank (2001 – Present)
Julie D’Aloia
Age – 48		1999 the Parent Corporation
1998 the Bank		Vice President of the Parent Corporation (2001 – Present); Secretary of the Parent Corporation (1998 – Present); Corporate Secretary of the Parent Corporation (1998 – August 2007); Senior Vice President of the Bank (2001 – Present); Secretary of the Bank (1998 – Present); Assistant-To-The-President of the Bank (1995 – August 2007); Corporate Secretary of the Bank (1998 – August 2007)
Joseph D. Gangemi
Age – 29		2008 the Parent Corporation
2004 the Bank		Executive Assistant to Chief Executive Officer, Investor Relations Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Parent Corporation and the Bank (June 2008 – Present); Executive Assistant to Chief Executive Officer and Investor Relations Officer of the Bank (January 2008 – June 2008); Executive Assistant to Chief Executive Officer of the Bank (August 2007 – January 2008); Executive Assistant to Chief Financial Officer of the Bank (August 2005 – August 2007); Finance Assistant of the Bank (November 2004 – August 2005); Teller of the Bank (February 2004 – November 2004)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name and AgeOfficer SinceBusiness Experience
Ronald Shapiro
Age – 58		2008 the Parent Corporation
2007 the Bank		Vice President and Senior Lending Officer of the Parent Corporation (July 2008 – Present); Senior Vice President and Senior Lending Officer of the Bank (July 2008 – Present); Vice President of the Bank (October 2007 – July 2008); Director of Lender Services, The Schonbraun McCann Group (real estate finance consulting firm) (February 2006 – August 2007); and Director and Mid Atlantic Regional Manager of Artesia Mortgage Capital Corporation (August 2004 – December 2005)
Lori A. Wunder
Age – 4346		 1998 the Parent Corporation
1995 the Bank		 Vice President of the Parent Corporation Senior Vice President (1998 – Present) Vice President (1997 – 1998) Assistant Vice President (1996 – 1997) and Assistant Cashier (1995 – 1996) of the Bank
Julie D’Aloia
Age – 46		1999 the Parent Corporation 1998 the BankVice President & Secretary (2001 – Present) and Corporate Secretary (1998–2000) of the Parent Corporation Senior Vice President & Secretary (2001– Present); Assistant-To-The-President of the Bank and Corporate Secretary (1995 – 1998) of the Bank
Mark S. Cardone
Age – 44		2001 the Parent Corporation 2001 the BankVice President of the Parent Corporation Senior Vice President & Branch Administrator Of the Bank (2001 – Present) Vice President of Fleet Bank (1996 – 2001)
Christopher M. Gorey Age – 522006 the Parent Corporation 2006 the BankVice President of the Parent Corporation Senior Vice President and Senior Credit Officer Of the Bank (2006 – Present) Vice President of the Bank (1999(1998 – 2006)Present); Vice President of the Bank (1997 – 1998); Assistant Vice President of the Bank (1996 – 1997); and Assistant Cashier of the Bank (1995 – 1996)

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 4. Reserved

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Security Market Information

The common stock of the Parent Corporation is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The Corporation’s symbol is CNBC. As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation had 679605 stockholders of record. This does not include beneficial owners for whom CEDE & Company or others act as nominees. On December 31, 2007,2009, the closing low market bid and asked price was $11.05–$11.14,were $8.92 and $9.07, respectively.

The following table sets forth the high and low bid price, and the dividends declared, on a share of the Corporation’s common stock for the periods presented.years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. All amounts are adjusted for prior stock splits and stock dividends.

            
 Common Stock Price Common Dividends Declared Common Stock Price Common Dividends Declared
 2007 2006 2009 2008  
 High Bid Low Bid High Bid Low Bid 2007 2006 High Bid Low Bid High Bid Low Bid 2009 2008
Fourth Quarter $12.01  $11.05  $16.22  $15.60  $0.0900  $0.0857  $9.20  $7.36  $10.15  $7.45  $0.0300  $0.0900 
Third Quarter $14.99  $10.80  $16.39  $14.10  $0.0900  $0.0857   10.16   7.53   10.96   8.44   0.0300   0.0900 
Second Quarter $15.85  $13.86  $14.25  $11.70  $0.0900  $0.0857   9.15   6.88   10.38   8.45   0.0300   0.0900 
First Quarter $15.21  $14.51  $12.17  $10.85  $0.0900  $0.0857   8.50   6.43   11.32   9.95   0.0900   0.0900 
             $0.3600  $0.3400 
Total             $0.1800  $0.3600 

Share Repurchase Program

Repurchases may beHistorically, repurchases have been made from time to time as, in the opinion of management, market conditions warrant,warranted, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Shares repurchased will be added to the corporate treasury and will bewere used for future stock dividends and other issuances. As of December 31, 2007,2009, Center Bancorp had 13.214.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Parent Corporation had purchased 1,193,7801,386,863 common shares at an average cost per share of $11.68$11.44 under stock buyback programs announced in 2006, 2007 and 2007.2008. No repurchases were made during 2009. The repurchased shares were recorded as Treasury Stock, which resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ equity.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Information concerning the stock repurchases for the twelvethree months ended December 31, 20072009 is set forth below (1).below.

    
Period Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Balance at December 31, 2006  343,253  $11.38   343,253   362,139 
January 1, through March 31, 2007  —   —   343,253   362,139 
April 1, through June 30, 2007  —   —   343,253   362,139 
July 1, through September 30, 2007  292,174  $12.20   635,427   754,592 
October 1, through December 31, 2007  558,353  $11.59   1,193,780   196,239 
Balance at December 31, 2007  1,193,780  $11.68   1,193,780   196,239 
    
Period Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased		 Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit)		 Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs		 Maximum
Number of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs
October 1, through October 31, 2009    —  $  —   1,386,863   652,868 
November 1, through November 30, 2009  —   —   1,386,863   652,868 
December 1, through December 31, 2009  —   —   1,386,863   652,868 
Total  —  $—   1,386,863   652,868 

(1)Share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5 percent stock dividend declared on March 29, 2007 and paid on June 1, 2007.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock Compensation Plan Information

For information related to stock based compensation, see Note 2As noted elsewhere herein, on January 9, 2009, as part of the NotesU.S. Department of the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”), the Parent Corporation entered into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table gives information aboutwhich (i) the Parent Corporation issued and sold, and the U.S. Treasury purchased, 10,000 shares (the “Preferred Shares”) of the Company’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $10 million in cash, and (ii) the Parent Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 173,410 shares of the Parent Corporation’s Common Stock that maycommon stock at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. As a result of the successful completion of the Rights Offering in October 2009, the number of shares underlying the warrant held by the U.S. Treasury was reduced to 86,705 shares or 50 percent of the original 173,410 shares. Until the third anniversary of the issuance of the Preferred Shares, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be issued uponrequired for any increase in the exercise of options, warrants and rights underdividends on the Parent Corporation’s 1999 Incentive Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan and 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan ascommon stock or for any stock repurchases unless the Preferred Shares have been redeemed in their entirety or the U.S. Treasury has transferred the Preferred Shares to third parties. See “Dividends” below for additional restrictions on the payment of December 31, 2007. These plans were the Corporation’s only equity compensation plans in existence as of December 31, 2007.dividends.

   
Plan Category Number of Securities to Be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
(a)		 Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders  264,255  $6.07 – $15.73   685,159 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders  —   —   — 
Total  264,255  $6.07 – $15.73   685,159 

Dividends

Federal laws and regulations contain restrictions on the ability of the Parent Corporation and Union Center National Bank to pay dividends. For information regarding restrictions on dividends, see Part I, Item 1, “Business — Dividend Limitations” and Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Dividend Restrictions, Note 1817 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” Pursuant to the MOU between Union Center National Bank and the OCC, the Bank may not declare dividends without the prior approval of the OCC. In addition, under the terms of the trust preferred securities issued by Center Bancorp, Inc,Inc. Statutory Trust II, the Parent Corporation can not pay dividends on its common stock if the Corporation defers payments on the junior subordinated debentures which provide the cash flow for the payments on the trust preferred securities. Further, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Parent Corporation is unable to declare dividend payments on the Parent Corporation’s common stock (and certain preferred stock if the Parent Corporation issues additional series of preferred stock) if the Parent Corporation is in arrears in the payment of dividends on the Preferred Shares issued to the U.S. Treasury. Further, until the third anniversary of the U.S. Treasury’s investment or when all of the Preferred Shares have been redeemed or transferred, the Parent Corporation is not permitted to increase the amount of the quarterly cash dividend above $0.09 per share, which was the amount of the last regular dividend declared by the Parent Corporation prior to October 14, 2008.

15


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stockholders Return Comparison

Set forth below is a line graph presentation comparing the cumulative stockholder return on the Parent Corporation’s Common Stock,common stock, on a dividend reinvested basis, against the cumulative total returns of the Standard & Poor’s Composite and the SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index for the period from January 1, 20032005 through December 31, 2007.2009.

COMPARE 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG CENTER BANCORP INC.,
S&P COMPOSITE AND SNL MID-ATLANTIC BANK INDEX

Assumes $100 invested on January 1, 20032005
Assumes dividends reinvested
Fiscal year endingYear ended December 31, 2007.2009

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN OF ONE OR MORE
COMPANIES, PEER GROUPS, INDUSTRY INDEXES AND/OR BROAD MARKETS

            
 Fiscal Year Ending Fiscal Year Ending
Company/Index/Market 12/31/2002 12/31/2003 12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009
Center Bancorp, Inc  100.00   170.05   121.56   110.01   163.24   122.86 
Center Bancorp, Inc.  100.0   90.5   134.3   101.1   77.6   87.3 
S&P Composite  100.00   129.59   144.85   153.04   176.51   186.17   100.0   105.7   121.9   128.5   81.3   109.8 
SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index  100.00   142.18   150.59   153.26   183.94   139.10   100.0   101.8   122.1   92.4   50.9   53.6 

16


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

SUMMARY OF SELECTED STATISTICAL INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL DATA

          
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005(3)
 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data) (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Summary of Income
                                                  
Interest income $52,129  $53,325  $50,503  $40,049  $35,919  $51,110  $49,894  $52,129  $53,325  $50,503 
Interest expense  30,630   28,974   23,296   13,968   12,726   22,645   24,095   30,630   28,974   23,296 
Net interest income  21,499   24,351   27,207   26,081   23,193   28,465   25,799   21,499   24,351   27,207 
Provision for loan losses  350   57   —   752   522   3,261   1,561   350   57   — 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  21,149   24,294   27,207   25,329   22,671   25,204   24,238   21,149   24,294   27,207 
Other income  4,372   633   3,836   3,388   3,247   3,906   2,644   4,372   633   3,836 
Other expense  24,598   24,358   22,213   19,471   18,336   23,057   19,473   24,598   24,358   22,213 
Income before income tax expense  923   569   8,830   9,246   7,582   6,053   7,409   923   569   8,830 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2,933)   (3,329)   1,184   1,624   1,163 
Income tax expense (benefit)  1,480   1,567   (2,933)   (3,329)   1,184 
Net income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646  $7,622  $6,419  $4,573  $5,842  $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 
Net income available to common stockholders $4,006  $5,842  $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 
Statement of Financial Condition Data
                                                  
Investments $314,194  $381,733  $517,730  $571,127  $512,875  $298,124  $242,714  $314,194  $381,733  $517,730 
Total loans  551,669   550,414   505,826   377,304   349,525   715,453   676,203   551,669   550,414   505,826 
Goodwill and other intangibles  17,204   17,312   17,437   2,091   2,091   17,028   17,110   17,204   17,312   17,437 
Total assets  1,017,645   1,051,384   1,114,829   1,009,015   922,289   1,196,824   1,023,293   1,017,645   1,051,384   1,114,829 
Deposits  699,070   726,771   700,601   702,272   632,921   813,705   659,537   699,070   726,771   700,601 
Borrowings  218,109   206,434   293,963   216,357   214,724   269,253   268,440   218,109   206,434   293,963 
Stockholders’ equity $85,278  $97,613  $99,489  $68,643  $54,180   102,551   81,713   85,278   97,613   99,489 
Dividends
                                                  
Cash dividends $4,885  $4,808  $4,518  $3,238  $3,014  $2,434  $4,675  $4,885  $4,808  $4,518 
Dividend payout ratio  126.69%   123.35%   59.09%   42.48%   46.95%   60.76%   80.02%   126.69%   123.35%   59.09% 
Cash Dividends Per Share(1)
                                                  
Cash dividends $0.36  $0.34  $0.34  $0.32  $0.30  $0.18  $0.36  $0.36  $0.34  $0.34 
Earnings Per Share(1)
                                                  
Basic $0.28  $0.28  $0.60  $0.75  $0.65  $0.30  $0.45  $0.28  $0.28  $0.60 
Diluted $0.28  $0.28  $0.60  $0.75  $0.65  $0.30  $0.45  $0.28  $0.28  $0.60 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding(1)
                                                  
Basic  13,780,504   13,959,684   12,678,614   10,163,874   9,811,328   13,382,614   13,048,518   13,780,504   13,959,684   12,678,614 
Diluted  13,840,756   14,040,338   12,725,256   10,224,591   9,914,071   13,385,416   13,061,410   13,840,756   14,040,338   12,725,256 
Operating Ratios
                                                  
Return on average assets  0.38%   0.37%   0.69%   0.81%   0.74%   0.37%   0.58%   0.38%   0.37%   0.69% 
Average stockholders’ equity to average assets  9.33%   9.21%   7.79%   6.14%   5.96%   7.67%   8.28%   9.33%   9.21%   7.79% 
Return on average stockholders’ equity  4.09%   4.04%   8.91%   13.17%   12.35%   4.87%   7.03%   4.09%   4.04%   8.91% 
Return on tangible average stockholders’ equity(2)  5.00%   4.93%   10.34%   13.67%   12.87% 
Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity(2)  5.96%   8.86%   5.00%   4.93%   10.34% 
Book Value
                                                  
Book value per common share(1) $6.48  $7.02  $7.05  $6.27  $5.49  $6.38  $6.29  $6.48  $7.02  $7.05 
Tangible book value per common share(1)(2) $5.17  $5.77  $5.82  $6.08  $5.28  $5.21  $4.97  $5.17  $5.77  $5.82 
Non-Financial Information
                                                  
Common stockholders of record  679   717   767   529   527   605   640   679   717   767 
Staff-Full time equivalent  172   214   202   192   191 
Full-time equivalent staff  160   160   172   214   202 

Notes to Selected Financial Data

(1)All common share and per common share amounts have been adjusted for prior stock splits and stock dividends.

17


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)Tangible book value per common share, which is a non-Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (“GAAP”)non-GAAP financial measure, is computed by dividing stockholders’ equity less preferred stock, goodwill and other intangible assets by common shares outstanding. The following table provides certain related reconciliation’sreconciliations between GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)measures (stockholders’ equity and book value per common share) and the related non-GAAP measures:financial measures (tangible stockholders’ equity and tangible book value per common share):

          
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data) (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Common shares outstanding  13,155,784   13,910,450   14,103,209   10,939,398   9,861,247   14,572,029   12,991,312   13,155,784   13,910,450   14,103,209 
Stockholders’ equity $85,278  $97,613  $99,489  $68,643  $54,180  $102,551  $81,713  $85,278  $97,613  $99,489 
Less: Preferred Stock  9,619   —   —   —   — 
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets  17,204   17,312   17,437   2,091   2,091   17,028   17,110   17,204   17,312   17,437 
Tangible Stockholders’ Equity $68,074  $80,301  $82,052  $66,552  $52,089  $75,904  $64,603  $68,074  $80,301  $82,052 
Book value per share $6.48  $7.02  $7.05  $6.27  $5.49 
Book value per common share $6.38  $6.29  $6.48  $7.02  $7.05 
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets  1.31   1.25   1.23   0.19   0.21   1.17   1.32   1.31   1.25   1.23 
Tangible Book Value per Share $5.17  $5.77  $5.82  $6.08  $5.28 
Tangible Book Value per Common Share $5.21  $4.97  $5.17  $5.77  $5.82 

All per common share amounts reflect all prior stock splits and dividends.

Return on average tangible stockholders’ equity, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is computed by dividing net income by average stockholders’ equity less average goodwill and average other intangible assets, as follows:assets. The following table reflects a reconciliation between average stockholders’ equity and average tangible stockholders’ equity and a reconciliation between return on stockholders’ equity and return on average tangible stockholders’ equity.

          
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data) (Dollars in Thousands)
Net income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646  $7,622  $6,419  $4,573  $5,842  $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 
Average stockholders’ equity $94,345  $96,505  $85,772  $57,854  $51,959  $93,853  $83,123  $94,345  $96,505  $85,772 
Less: Average goodwill and other intangible assets  17,259   17,378   11,814   2,091   2,091   17,069   17,158   17,259   17,378   11,814 
Average Tangible Stockholders’ Equity $77,086  $79,127  $73,958  $55,763  $49,868  $76,784  $65,965  $77,086  $79,127  $73,958 
Return on average stockholders’ equity  4.09%   4.04%   8.91%   13.17%   12.35%   4.87%   7.03%   4.09%   4.04%   8.91% 
Add: Average goodwill and other intangible assets  0.91   0.89   1.43   0.50   0.52   1.09   1.83   0.91   0.89   1.43 
Return on Average Tangible Stockholders’ Equity  5.00%   4.93%   10.34%   13.67%   12.87%   5.96%   8.86%   5.00%   4.93%   10.34% 

The Corporation believes that in comparing financial institutions, investors desire to analyze tangible book valuestockholders’ equity rather than book value.stockholders’ equity, as they discount the significance of goodwill and other intangible assets.

(3)The Corporation completed the acquisition of Red Oak Bank as of the close of business on May 20, 2005. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and the excess cost over the fair value of net assets acquired (“goodwill”) in the transaction was $14.7 million. The Corporation also recorded a core deposit intangible of $702,617 in connection with the acquisition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The purpose of this analysis is to provide the reader with information relevant to understanding and assessing Thethe Corporation’s results of operations for each of the past three years and financial condition for each of the past two years. In order to fully appreciate this analysis, the reader is encouraged to review the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto appearing under Item 8 of this report, and statistical data presented in this document.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

See Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding forward lookingforward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The accounting and reporting policies followed by Center Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”)the Corporation conform, in all material respects, to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.GAAP. In

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

The Corporation’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“this MD&A”) of financial condition and results of operations.&A. The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Corporation has identified its policies on the allowance for loan losses, other than temporary impairment of securities, income tax liabilities and goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets to be critical because management must make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Additional information on these policies can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable creditloan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Condition.

The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses includes, among other factors, an analysis of historical loss rates by loan category applied to current loan totals. However, actual loan losses may be higher or lower than historical trends, which vary. Actual losses on specified problem loans, which also are provided for in the evaluation, may vary from estimated loss percentages, which are established based upon a limited number of potential loss classifications.

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses will be adequate to absorb loan losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on the evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The evaluation takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, and specific problem loans and current economic conditions which may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. The evaluation also details historical losses by loan category and the resulting loan loss rates which are projected for current loan total amounts. Loss estimates for specified problem loans are also detailed. All of the factors considered in the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses may be subject to change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required that could materially adversely impact earnings in future periods. Additional information can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities

Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. FASB ASC 320-10-65 (previously FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Investments”), clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.

In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FASB ASC 320-10-65 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. Impairment charges on certain investment securities of approximately $4.2 million were recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively. Of this amount, $3.4 million related to charges taken on two pooled trust preferred securities owned by the Corporation, $188,000 related to three private label collateralized mortgage obligations, $140,000 on its Lehman bond holding and $113,000 on an equity holding. Additionally, the Corporation recorded a $364,000 charge related to a court order for the liquidation of the Reserve Primary Fund. It is expected that 99 percent of Fund assets will be returned to the Corporation. The Corporation’s approach to determining whether or not other-than-temporary impairment exists for any of these investments was consistent with the accounting guidance in effect at that time. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation primarily relied upon the guidance in FASB ASC 320-10-65 (previously FAS 115-2 and 124-2), FASB ASC 820-10-65 (previously FASB FAS 157-4) and FASB ASC 310-10-35 (previously FAS 114). Additional information can be found in Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impairment charges on certain investment securities of approximately $1.8 million were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008. As a result of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008, the Corporation incurred an impairment charge of $1.2 million in its investment securities portfolio during the third quarter of 2008 and an additional $100,000 during the fourth quarter of 2008. These charges were based on the Corporation’s expectation at December 31, 2008 of what the Corporation believed it would receive from the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings as opposed to an attempted sale into an illiquid market. Additionally, the Corporation recorded impairment charges of $461,000 relating to three equity security holdings. This determination was made after certain events during 2008 relating to the financial condition of the issuers caused concern that recovery of the carrying value would not occur in the near term. As such, it was deemed appropriate to mark each applicable security down to fair value. The Corporation’s approach to determining whether or not other-than-temporary impairment exists for any of these investments was consistent with the accounting guidance in effect at that time. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Corporation primarily relied upon the guidance in FASB ASC 320-10-35 (previously FSP FAS 115-1 and 124-1), FASB ASC 820-10-35 (previously FASB FAS 157-3) and FASB ASC 325-40 (previously EITF 99-20). No impairment charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Income Taxes

The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns.

Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Notes 1 and 1211 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include additional discussion on the accounting for income taxes.

Goodwill

The Corporation accounts for goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets in accordance withadopted the provisions of FASB ASC 350-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and intangible assets.” SFAS No. 142 includes requirements to testOther Intangible Assets”), which requires that goodwill and indefinite livedbe reported separate from other intangible assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition and not be amortized but tested for impairment rather than amortize them.annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise for impairment. No impairment charge was deemed necessary for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Fair Value of Investment Securities

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10-35 (previously FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The Market for That Asset Is Not Active”), to clarify the application of the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. FASB ASC 820-10-35 was applied to the Corporation’s December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements. Changes in the Corporation’s methodology occurred for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as new accounting guidance was released in April of 2009 with mandatory adoption required in the second quarter. The Corporation has testedrelied upon the goodwillguidance in FASB ASC 820-10-65 (previously FASB FAS 157-4) when determining fair value for the Corporation’s pooled trust preferred securities and at December 31, 2007, there was no goodwill impairment.private issue corporate bond. See Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments, for further discussion.

Introduction

The following introduction to Management’s Discussion and Analysis highlights the principal factors that contributed to the Corporation’s earnings performance in 2007.

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS2009.

The year of 20072009 was a challenging one for the banking industry and for the Corporation. The current global financial crisis and difficult economic climate has created challenges to financial institutions both domestically and abroad. Interest rates for most of 2007in 2009 were reflective of highersignificantly lower short-term interest rates andin an effort to stimulate the sustained flatness of the yield curve. This, coupled with intense competitioneconomy. Competition for deposits in the Corporation’s marketplace continued to place pressure on funding costs.remained intense while customers’ preference in seeking safety through full FDIC insured products and more liquidity became paramount in light of the financial crisis. Market conditions became moreremained volatile at the end of the third quarter,during 2009, related to global instability in the markets in connection with the sub primesub-prime crises. While we continue to see an improvement in balance sheet strength and core earnings performance, we are still concerned with the credit stability of the broader markets. As a result, the Federal Reserve decreased short-termkept overnight borrowing rates at zero to 25 basis points throughout the course of 2009. Short-term interest rates 100 basis points by December 31, 2007. Short term interest rates declined moreremained lower than longer term ones and market driven longer-term interest rates remained mostly unchanged at relatively lower levels resulting in a somewhat flatan improved steepening of the yield curve. This resulted in a compressionan expansion of the Corporation’s net interest margin,income, which is the Corporation’s primary source of income. The Corporation also took action throughout the year to stem the decline in margin and to reduce further exposure to interest rates through a reduction in higher cost funding and non-core balances in the deposit mix and improvement in the earning-assetearning asset mix. Should the yield curve remain flat or inverted, we expect that our net interest margin would continueThe Corporation’s continued progress in growing and improving its balance sheet earning asset mix has helped to sustain pressure, therefore limiting the growth of net interest incomeexpand its spread and net income. However, the Corporation does expect its earning- assets to grow and for the mix to improve substantially in 2008, which should help to mitigate the effects on its margin. We intend to continue to use a substantial portion of the proceeds of maturing investments to help fund new loan growth.

The Corporation’s net income in 20072009 was $3.9$4.6 million or $0.28$0.30 per fully diluted common share, compared with net income of $3.9$5.8 million or $0.28$0.45 per fully diluted common share in 2006.2008. A substantial portion of our earnings in 20072009 and 2006 arose2008 was from tax benefits.core operations.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Earnings for 20072009 were positively impacted by net interest rate compression, increased operating overheadincome and spread expansion through both balance sheet improvements and a reduced effective tax benefit, whichlower cost of funds as well as net securities gains as compared to net securities losses in 2008. These improvements were partiallymore than offset by increases in non-interest income, primarily from an increase in net gains on securities sold, higher service charge feesloan loss provisions as well as substantially higher FDIC insurance, higher other real estate owned expenses and other fee income.higher pension expense. Other expense for the twelve-months ended December 31, 20072009 totaled $24.6$23.1 million, an increase of $0.2$3.6 million, or 0.99%, over18.4 percent, from the comparable period in 2006.twelve-months ended December 31, 2008 due principally to the above mentioned items.

Higher operating expenses during the twelve-monthtwelve month period resulted primarily from increases in occupancysalaries and premise expense and other general and administrative expenses. Other general and administrative expense increased $0.7 million associated with increases in professional consulting, legal, other real estate owned (“OREO”) expense,employee benefits, FDIC insurance and customer corporate analysis chargesOREO expense, offset in part by a decrease in net occupancy expenses, premises and the charge-off of the Beacon Trust acquisition.equipment and marketing expenses. The Corporation previously announced a numberstrategic outsourcing agreement with Fiserv to provide core account processing services, which is consistent with the Corporation’s other strategic initiatives to streamline operations, reduce operating overhead and allow the Corporation to focus on core competencies of customer service and product development. This coupled with previously initiated cost cutting initiativesreduction plans are intended to improve operating efficiencies, business and expanded those initiatives intechnical operations. The core processing transition was consummated during the fourth quarter to includeof 2009. Additionally, the closingconsolidation of the Corporation’s branch office on 392 Springfield Avenue in Summit, New Jersey during the first quarter of 2009 into its Red Oak Banking Center and its branchnew office on 84 South Street545 Morris Avenue in Morristown. These facilities have been combined with the Morristown Town Hall office and are expected to improveSummit, New Jersey resulted in improved efficiency and increaseincreased customer service. We have additionally signed an agreement to outsource certain telecommunication service with the Atlantic Central Banker BITS program; that is expected to reduce telephone expense by approximately $235,000 in 2008. Additional similar outsourcing arrangements are currently being reviewed. Such anticipated cost savings constitute “forward-looking statements”. Actual results could differ substantially depending in part upon competition with our markets and unanticipated costs we may incur.

For the twelve-monthstwelve months ended December 31, 2007,2009, total salaries and benefits decreasedincreased by $854,000$1.4 million, or 6.95%16.6 percent to $11.4$9.9 million. The reductionincrease in expense was attributableprimarily due to a reduction$755,000 benefit recognized in staff, pension curtailment and elimination2008 relating to the termination of certaintwo benefit plans offsetcoupled with increased pension expense in part by one-time charges related2009 due to severance paymentsboth lower asset valuations and the expected rate of return on the Corporation’s defined pension plan, which was frozen back in the third quarter of 2007.

The decreasedincreased tax rate resulted in part from changes in the Corporation’s business entity structure during 2007 and into 2008 coupled with a higher proportion of taxable income tax reductions, tax planning benefits and an internal entity reorganization of its subsidiaries undertaken by the Corporationversus tax-exempt income in 2006 and 2007 with its subsidiary companies.2009.

Total non-interest revenueincome increased as a percentage of total revenue, which is the sum of interest income and non-interest income, in 20072009 largely due to a $3.5 million increase$491,000 in net securities gains onas compared to $1.1 million in net securities sold forlosses in 2008. For the period.twelve months ended December 31, 2009, total other income increased $1.3 million as compared with the twelve months ended December 31, 2008, from $2.6 million to $3.9 million. Excluding net securities gains and losses in the respective periods, the Corporation recorded total other income of $3.5$3.4 million in the twelve-monthstwelve months ended December 31, 2007,2009, compared to $3.2$3.8 million in the twelve-monthstwelve months ended December 31, 2006.2008, representing a decrease of $335,000 or 8.9 percent. This revenue, exclusive of gains on securities sold, increased $274,000 or 8.57 percent in 2007 as compared with 2006. For the twelve-months ended December 31, 2007, total other income increased $3.7 million as compared with the twelve-months of 2006. This increasedecrease was primarily attributable to a $206,000 increase$180,000 decrease in service charges, commissions from

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sales of mutual funds and annuitiesfees as well as increases in bank owned lifelower other income, resulting primarily from lower letters of credit fee income and title insurance income, overdraft fees and service charge income on deposit accounts.income.

Total assets at December 31, 2007,2009 were $1.018$1.197 billion, a decreasean increase of 3.2117.0 percent from assets of $1.051$1.023 billion at December 31, 2006.2008. The reductionincrease in assets in part, reflects the declinegrowth in our loan and investment securities portfolios as well as a higher level of uninvested excess cash, which reflects inflows in core savings deposits and Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) Reciprocal deposits, as customers desire for safety and liquidity became paramount in light of the investment portfoliofinancial crisis. The Corporation has made a concerted effort to reduce non-core balances and, reduction inaccordingly, its uninvested cash position was reduced by an average of $35 million during the fourth quarter of 2009. Additionally, there has been a concerted effort to reduce higher costing retail deposits. The Corporation utilized a portion of the cash flows generated from the sales of securities to help fund loan growth and to reduce high cost deposits and, where possible, short-term borrowings.

Loan growth was stagnant during the first two quarters of 2007 due to increased pay downs on existing loans and a slowing of new loan generation. During the third and fourth quarter, loan growth wasremained strong in 2009, spurred by business development efforts. Overall, the portfolio grew year over year by approximately $19.0$70.0 million on average or a 3.63an 11.2 percent increase from 2006. A strong2008. Strong demand for commercial real estate marketloans prevailed throughout the year in ourthe Corporation’s market in New Jersey, despite the economic climate at both the state and national levels and market turmoil from the sub primesub-prime markets. The Corporation is encouraged by the strength of loan demand and positive momentum gained this past year in growing that segment of earning-assets.earning assets. However, the Corporation continues to remain concerned with the credit stability of the broader markets due to the weakened economic climate.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Asset quality continues to remain high and credit culture conservative. During 2007,Even so, the stability of the economy and credit markets remains uncertain and as such, has had an impact on certain credits within our portfolio. The Corporation did not experience any substantial problems within itscontinued to make provisions to the allowance for loan portfolio.losses as efforts are made to stabilize credit quality issues. At December 31, 2007,2009, non-performing assets totaled $4.4$8.1 million or 0.430.68 percent of total assets, as compared with $700,000$13.9 million, or 0.071.03 percent, at September 30, 2009 and $4.7 million or 0.46 percent at December 31, 2006.2008. The increase in non-accrualnon-performing loans from December 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to the addition of three large commercial loans and an increase in troubled debt restructurings. In March of 2009, one commercial mortgage inreal estate construction project of industrial warehouses was downgraded to non-accrual status, which was a participation loan with another New Jersey bank. In December of 2009, the amount of $2.5 million. However, subsequentCorporation took steps to terminate this participation agreement, as the participation ended on December 31, 2007, the2009. The Corporation received full payment of this commercial mortgage, including principal of $2.5 million and interest of $83,277, all of which will be reflected in resultshas filed for the first quarterreturn of 2008. The Corporation continuesthe outstanding principal and has reclassified this $5.1 million outstanding loan into other assets on the Corporation’s balance sheet. Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) decreased by $3.9 million due solely to aggressively pursue the sale of OREO and currently has a contractresidential condominium construction project in Union County, New Jersey during the third quarter of sale on one of the properties in the amount of $360,000. These actions support the Corporation’s strong credit quality and would bring total non-performing assets to $1.5 million or .14 percent of total assets.2009.

At December 31, 2007,2009, the total allowance for loan losses amounted to approximately $5.2$8.3 million, or 0.94%1.16 percent of total loans. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total non-performing assets, exclusive of OREO,loans amounted to 132.15102.2 percent at December 31, 20072009 as compared with 509.2351.4 percent at September 30, 20072009 and 708.6809.1 percent at December 31, 2006.2008. This declinedecrease in the ratio from December 31, 20062008 to December 31, 20072009 was due to a $3.2 millionthe previously mentioned increase in non-performing assets.loans.

Deposit experiencegrowth was mixedstrong in 20072009, reflective of customers’ desire for safety and liquidity and flight to quality in light of the changes in short-term interest rates. A modest decline in average deposits included a shift to more costly interest-bearing accounts, principally money market deposits.financial crisis. At December 31, 2007,2009, total deposits for the Corporation were $699.1$813.7 million. Non-interest-bearing core deposits, a low-costlow cost source of funding, continue to be a key-fundingkey funding source. At December 31, 2007,2009, this source of funding amounted to $111.4$130.5 million or 12.112.0 percent of total funding sources and 15.916.0 percent of total deposits.

More volatile rate sensitive deposits, principally certificatesCertificates of depositsdeposit $100,000 and greater decreasedincreased to 9.217.8 percent of total deposits at December 31, 20072009 from 11.515.2 percent one year earlier. The geographic expansionWith the current turmoil in the financial markets, some of the Corporation’s depositors have become sensitive to obtaining full FDIC insurance for their time deposits. To accommodate its customers, the Corporation into desirable markets (suchbegan offering Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) in 2008. As a result of that offering and the temporary increase in insurance coverage by the FDIC to $250,000, the Corporation reported an increase of $44.3 million in certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 at December 31, 2009 as Morristown and Boonton in Morris County, New Jersey) over the past several years has contributedcompared to the growth in market share, as well as increased loan demand and change in deposit mix.year-end 2008.

Total stockholders’ equity decreased 12.64increased 25.5 percent from 20062008 to $85.3$102.6 million, and represented 8.388.57 percent of total assets at year-end. Book value per common share (total common stockholders’ equity divided by the number of shares outstanding) decreasedincreased to $6.48$6.38 as compared with $7.02$6.29 a year ago, primarily as a result of a changethe $11 million capital raise from the Corporation’s rights offering consummated in other comprehensive income coupled with the repurchase of shares by the Corporation during 2006 and 2007 under its buyback program.October 2009. Tangible book value per common share (which excludes goodwill and other intangibles from common stockholders’ equity) decreasedincreased to $5.17$5.21 from $5.77$4.97 a year ago; see itemItem 6 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of tangible book value (which is a non-GAAP financial measure) to book value. Return on average stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 20072009 was 4.094.87 percent compared to 4.047.03 percent for 2006.2008. This returndecrease was attributable to in part to lower earnings in 2006 and 2007

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2009 compared with 20052008 coupled with higher average equity due primarily to both the capital raise from the rights offering and capital received under the additional shares issued in June 2005 and May 2005.U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program. The Tier I Leverage capital ratio decreasedincreased to 8.137.80 percent of total assets at December 31, 2007,2009, as compared with 8.647.71 percent at December 31, 2006.2008.

A key element of theThe Corporation’s performance is its strong capital base whichincludes the $11 million capital raise from the rights offering as well as the $10 million of capital received from the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program. It also includes $5.2 million in subordinated debentures at December 31, 20072009 and December 31, 2006. The Statutory Trust I subsidiary redeemed $10.3 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities due December 18, 2031 on December 18, 2006. The most recent2008. This issuance of $5.0 million in floating rate MMCapS(SM) Securities occurred on December 19, 2003. The Corporation used the net proceeds of this issuance for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including capital contributions to the Corporation’s banking subsidiary to support its growth strategies. These securities presently are included as a component of Tier I capital for regulatory capital purposes. In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46, these securities are classified as subordinated debentures on the Consolidated Statements of Condition.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Corporation’s risk-based capital ratios at December 31, 20072009 were 11.6511.51 percent for Tier I capital and 12.4112.46 percent for total risk-based capital. These ratios substantially exceed the regulatory minimum of 4 percent for Tier I risk-based capital and 8 percent for total risk-based capital under regulatory guidelines. Total Tier I capital decreasedincreased to approximately $79.1$99.3 million at December 31, 20072009 from $88.0$78.2 million at December 31, 2006.2008. The decreaseincrease in Tier I capital primarily reflects stock repurchases described below.

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation’s return on average stockholders’ equity (“ROE”) was 4.09 percent and its return on average assets (“ROA”) was 0.38 percent. ROA includes intangible assets arising from the Red Oak Bank acquisitionnew capital received during 2005. The Corporation’s return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (“ROATE”) was 5.00 percent for 2007. The comparable ratios for the year ended December 31, 2006, were ROE of 4.04 percent, ROA of 0.37 percent, and ROATE of 4.93 percent. See the discussion and reconciliation of ROATE, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, under Item 6 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.2009.

The Corporation announced an increase in its common stock buyback program on September 28, 2007 and June 26, 2008, under which the Parent Corporation was authorized to purchase up to 1,390,0192,039,731 shares of Center Bancorp’s outstanding common stock. Under the program, repurchases may be made from time to time as, in the opinion of management, market conditions warrant, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation hashad repurchased 1,193,7801,386,863 shares under the program at an average cost of $11.68$11.44 per share. Repurchases are now restricted pursuant to the Parent Corporation’s participation in TARP and as such, there were no repurchases during 2009. See Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10K.

The following sections discuss the Corporation’s Results of Operations, Asset and Liability Management, Liquidity and Capital Resource.Resources.

Results of Operations

Net income for the year ended December 31, 20072009 was $3,856,000$4,573,000 as compared to $3,898,000$5,842,000 earned in 20062008 and $7,646,000$3,856,000 earned in 2005. Net income decreased by 1.082007, a decrease of 21.7 percent while basicfrom 2008 to 2009. Basic and fully diluted earnings per common share remained the same atwas $0.30 per share in 2009 as compared with $0.45 per share in 2008 and $0.28 per share for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Corporation restructured its statement of condition in March 2006. This resulted in the sale of $86.3 million of available for sale securities and the recording of a charge of $3.6 million ($2.4 million net of tax). This led to a decrease of 49.02 percent in net income and decreases in basic and diluted earnings per share of 53.33 percent for the year ended December 31, 2006, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005.2007. All common share and per share information for all periods presented have been retroactively restated for common stock splits and common stock dividends distributed to common stockholders during the periods presented.

TheFor the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s return on average stockholders’ equity (“ROE”) was 4.87 percent and its return on average assets (“ROA”) was 0.380.37 percent. The Corporation’s return on average tangible stockholders’ equity (“ROATE”) was 5.96 percent for 2009. The comparable ratios for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared with 0.372008, were ROE of 7.03 percent, for 2006ROA of 0.58 percent, and 0.69 percent for 2005, whileROATE of 8.86 percent. See the return on tangible average stockholders’ equity (adiscussion and reconciliation of ROATE, which is a non-GAAP financial measure) was 5.00 percent, 4.93 percent and 10.34 percent, respectively. Seemeasure, under Item 6 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation to return on average stockholders’ equity.10-K.

Earnings performance for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflected continued adherence to the Corporation’s strategic initiatives. These initiatives are designed to sharpen our business focus and strengthen our financial performance, emphasizing the importance of core relationship business and a conservative credit

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

culture. Earnings for the year2009 were negatively impacted by a decline in interest income, due to a decline in the volume of interest-earning assets, as well as an increase in interestother expense, associated with the rise in interest-bearing liabilities, an increase in thedue primarily to a higher provision for loan losses a modest increasecoupled with increases in non-interestFDIC insurance, pension and OREO expense, and a reduction in income tax benefits, offset in part by an increaseimprovement in non-interest income.net interest income, due primarily to a lower cost of funds, and higher other income, due to net securities gains in 2009 as compared to losses in 2008.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net Interest Income

The following table presents the components of net interest income (onon a tax-equivalent basis)basis for the past three years.

                  
                  
 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior
Year		 Percent
Change		 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior
Year		 Percent
Change		 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior
Year		 Percent
Change		 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior Year		 Percent
Change		 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior Year		 Percent
Change		 Amount Increase
(Decrease)
from
Prior Year		 Percent
Change
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Interest income:
                                                                                          
Investments $19,255  $(3,215)   (14.31)  $22,470  $(4,823)   (17.67)  $27,293  $3,981   17.08  $14,226  $(179)   (1.24)  $14,405  $(4,850)   (25.19)  $19,255  $(3,215)   (14.31) 
Loans, including fees  33,527   1,528   4.78   31,999   6,670   26.33   25,329   6,800   36.70   36,751   641   1.78   36,110   2,583   7.70   33,527   1,528   4.78 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement
to resell		  604   57   10.42   547   518   1786.21   29   29   100.00 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell  0   (113)   (100.00)   113   (491)   (81.29)   604   57   10.42 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  549   42   8.28   507   110   27.71   397   225   130.81   643   49   8.25   594   45   8.20   549   42   8.28 
Total interest income  53,935   (1,588)   (2.86)   55,523   2,475   4.67   53,048   11,035   26.27   51,620   398   0.78   51,222   (2,713)   (5.03)   53,935   (1,588)   (2.86) 
Interest expense:
                                                                                          
Certificates $100 or more  3,964   (966)   (19.59)   4,930   1,102   28.79   3,828   2,550   199.53 
Deposits  16,871   3,796   29.03   13,075   5,304   68.25   7,771   1,634   26.63   12,308   (979)   (7.37)   13,287   (7,548)   (36.23)   20,835   2,830   15.72 
Borrowings  9,795   (1,174)   (10.70)   10,969   (728)   (6.22)   11,697   5,144   78.50   10,337   (471)   (4.36)   10,808   1,013   10.34   9,795   (1,174)   (10.70) 
Total interest expense  30,630   1,656   5.72   28,974   5,678   24.37   23,296   9,328   66.78   22,645   (1,450)   (6.02)   24,095   (6,535)   (21.34)   30,630   1,656   5.72 
Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis  23,305   (3,244)   (12.22)   26,549   (3,203)   (10.77)   29,752   1,707   6.09   28,975   1,848   6.81   27,127   3,822   16.40   23,305   (3,244)   (12.22) 
Tax-equivalent adjustment  (1,806)   392   (17.83)   (2,198)   347   (13.63)   (2,545)   (581)   29.58   (510)   818   (61.60)   (1,328)   478   (26.47)   (1,806)   392   (17.83) 
Net interest income $21,499  $(2,852)   (11.71)  $24,351  $(2,856)   (10.50)  $27,207  $1,126   4.32  $28,465  $2,666   10.33  $25,799  $4,300   20.00  $21,499  $(2,852)   (11.71) 

Note: The tax-equivalent adjustment was computed based on an assumed statutory Federal income tax rate of 34 percent. Adjustments were made for interest earned on tax-advantaged instruments.

Historically, the most significant component of the Corporation’s earnings has been net interest income, which is the difference between the interest earned inon the portfolio of earning-assetsearning assets (principally loans and investments) and the interest paid for deposits and borrowings, which support these assets. There were several factors that affected net interest income during 2007,2009, including the volume, pricing, mix and maturity of earninginterest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest rate fluctuations.

Net interest income is directly affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which support those assets, as well as changes in the rates earned and paid. Net interest income is presented in this financial review on a tax equivalent basis by adjusting tax-exempt income (primarily interest earned on various obligations of state and political subdivisions) by the amount of income tax which would have been paid had the assets been invested in taxable issues, and then in accordance with the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the net interest income data presented in this financial review differ from the Corporation’s net interest income components of the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere in this report.

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased $3.22009 increased $1.9 million, or 12.226.8 percent, to $29.0 million, from $26.5$27.1 million for 2006.2008. The Corporation’s net interest margin decreased 2311 basis points to 2.522.85 percent from 2.752.96 percent. From 20052007 to 2006,2008, net interest income on a tax equivalent basis decreasedincreased by $3.2$3.8 million and the net interest margin decreasedincreased by 1444 basis points. Our net interest margin has been adversely impacted by the high level of uninvested cash, which accumulated due to the strong deposit growth experienced throughout 2009.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The change in net interest income from 20062008 to 20072009 was primarily attributable in part to the changereduction in short-term interest rates that occurred in 2008 and have remained at historic low levels throughout 2009 coupled with a sustained steepening of the interest rate yield curve that impactedcurve. Steps were taken during 2009 to improve the Corporation’s net interest margin by continuing to lower rates in concert with the decline in market benchmark rates. However, in light of the financial institutionscrisis, the Corporation experienced significant growth during 2007.2009 in core savings deposits and CDARS Reciprocal deposits, as customers’ desire for safety and liquidity became paramount in light of the investment concerns. During the fourth quarter of 2009, a concerted effort was made to reduce non-core, single service deposits, and accordingly its uninvested cash position, which had an adverse impact on the Corporation’s net interest margin during 2009. However, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation’s net interest spread improved by 21 basis points as a 3352 basis point increasedecrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets was more than offset by a 73 basis point decrease in the average interest rates paid on total interest-bearing liabilities was offset only in part by an 8 basis point increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets from 5.75 percent in 2006 to 5.83 percent for 2007. The change in average yield on both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities reflected the increase in interest rates that occurred in 2007 as opposed to the lower interest rate environment in 2006 coupled with the impact of the sustained flatness of the yield curve and other volatile market conditions that affected rates in 2007.liabilities.

For the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, average interest-earning assets increased by $102.4 million to $1.018 billion, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2008. The 2009 change in average interest-earning asset volume was primarily due to increased loan and investment volume, which is consistent with the balance sheet strategies of changing and improving the mix of average earning assets. Increased average loan volume in 2009 was funded primarily by deposit growth. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $193.9 million, due primarily to increases in core savings deposits and CDARS Reciprocal deposits.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, average interest-earning assets decreased by $41.4$8.8 million to $924.5$915.8 million, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006.2007. The 20072008 change in average interest-earning asset volume was primarily due to decreased volumes of investment securities in the mix of average earning assetsand lower short-term investments offset in part by increased loan volume. Increased average loan volume in 2007 was funded with cash flow from the investment portfolio. The change in interest-bearing liabilities was principally from higher rate money market and interest-bearing transaction accounts, which offset declines in time deposits and short term borrowings.

For the year ended December 31, 2006, average interest-earning assets decreased by $62.2 million to $965.9 million, as compared with the year ended December 31, 2005. The 2006 change in average interest-earning asset volume was primarily due to decreased volumes of investment securities which is consistent with the balance sheet strategies implemented by management in the first quarter of 2006, offset in part by increased loans which were funded in part with more expensive interest-bearing liabilities, principally higher rate time deposit products such as certificates of deposit and money market accounts.

The factors underlying the year-to-year changes in net interest income are reflected in the tables presented belowon pages 36 and on page 23,38, each of which have been presented on a tax-equivalent basis (assuming a 34 percent tax rate). The table on page 2738 (Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates) shows the Corporation’s consolidated average balance of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity, the amount of income produced from interest-earning assets and the amount of expense incurred from interest-bearing liabilities, and net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net Interest Margin

The following table quantifies the impact on net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) resulting from changes in average balances and average rates over the past three years. Any change in interest income or expense attributable to both changes in volume and changes in rate has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of change in each category

24

TABLE OF CONTENTScategory.

Analysis of Variance in Net Interest Income Due to Volume and Rates

            
 2007/2006
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:		 2006/2005
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:		 2009/2008
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:		 2008/2007
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
 Average
Volume		 Average
Rate		 Net
Change		 Average
Volume		 Average
Rate		 Net
Change		 Average
Volume		 Average
Rate		 Net
Change		 Average
Volume		 Average
Rate		 Net
Change
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
                                                            
Investment securities:
                                                            
Taxable $(2,258)  $234  $(2,024)  $(5,000)  $1,553  $(3,447)  $3,553  $(1,355)  $2,198  $(2,835)  $(364)  $(3,199) 
Non-Taxable  (1,007)   (184)   (1,191)   (2,160)   784   (1,376)   (2,463)   86   (2,377)   (1,577)   (74)   (1,651) 
Loans, net of unearned discounts  1,170   358   1,528   4,015   2,655   6,670 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell  76   (19)   57   467   51   518 
Loans, net of unearned discount  3,864   (3,223)   641   4,807   (2,224)   2,583 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell  (56)   (57)   (113)   (294)   (197)   (491) 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  (23)   65   42   (70)   180   110   25   24   49   145   (100)   45 
Total interest-earning assets  (2,042)   454   (1,588)   (2,748)   5,223   2,475   4,923   (4,525)   398   246   (2,959)   (2,713) 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                            
Money market deposits  617   1,576   2,193   875   1,546   2,421   (545)   (1,298)   (1,843)   332   (3,431)   (3,099) 
Savings deposits  (455)   146   (309)   (377)   574   197   1,017   483   1,500   (53)   (14)   (67) 
Time deposits  (2,047)   929   (1,118)   169   3,015   3,184   3,648   (3,050)   598   (410)   (2,170)   (2,580) 
Other interest-bearing deposits  1,033   1,031   2,064   4   600   604   204   (1,438)   (1,234)   (1,039)   (763)   (1,802) 
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  (1,701)   527   (1,174)   (3,091)   2,363   (728)   (463)   (8)   (471)   2,654   (1,641)   1,013 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  (2,553)   4,209   1,656   (2,420)   8,098   5,678   3,861   (5,311)   (1,450)   1,484   (8,019)   (6,535) 
Change in net interest income $511  $(3,755)  $(3,244)  $(328)  $(2,875)  $(3,203)  $1,062  $786  $1,848  $(1,238)  $5,060  $3,822 

Interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the year ended December 31, 2007 decreased2009 increased by approximately $1.6 million$398,000 or 2.860.8 percent as compared with the year ended December 31, 2006.2008. This decreaseincrease was due primarily reflects a reductionto an increase in balances of the volume ofCorporation’s loan and investment securities portfolios offset in part by improved yield on certain components of earning assets.a decline in rates due to the actions taken by the Federal Reserve to lower market interest rates. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased on average $19.0$70.1 million to $541.3$692.6 million from $522.3$622.5 million in 2006,2008, primarily driven by growth in commercial loans and commercial real estate.

The loan portfolio represented approximately 58.568.0 percent of the Corporation’s interest earninginterest-earning assets (on average) during the twelve-months of 2007both 2009 and 54.1 percent in 2006.2008. Average investment securities volume decreasedincreased during 20072009 by $61.4$36.0 million compared to 2006;2008 as the declineCorporation has continued to reduce its concentration in volume was used to fund loan growthtax-exempt securities and the decline in interest- bearing liabilities.focused on purchases of lower risk-based mortgage backed securities. The average yield on interest-earning assets increaseddecreased from 5.755.59 percent in 20062008 to 5.835.07 percent in 2007.2009. The volume of Federal Funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell increaseddecreased by $1.5$4.0 million on average as compared with 2006. The average yield on such assets decreased to 5.01% as compared to 5.19% in 2006.2008.

The increase in the volume of loans in 20072009 primarily reflected increases in commercial loans and mortgages and residential mortgagecommercial real estate loans. The changeincrease in interest–bearing liabilities was principallythe average volume on total interest-earning assets created an increase in increased levelsinterest income of high$4.9 million, as compared with a decline of $4.5 million attributable to rate decreases in most interest-earning assets.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Interest income (fully tax-equivalent) decreased by $2.7 million from 2007 to 2008 primarily due to a decline in yield interest-bearing money market deposits offset in part with declinesby an increase in savings and time deposits.loan volume. The increasedecrease in average yield on total interest-earning assets contributed $0.4created a $3.0 million reduction to the increase in interest income as compared with a $2.0contribution of $0.2 million reduction attributable to volume decreases in certain interest-earning assets.increases, principally loans.

Interest income (fully tax-equivalent) increasedThe Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) kept the Federal Funds target rate at zero to 0.25 percent throughout 2009. This action by $2.5 million from 2005the FOMC allowed the Corporation to 2006 primarily due to an increase in the rates earned on average interest-earning assets. The increase in average yield on total

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

interest-earning assets contributed $5.2 million to the increase in interest income as compared with a $2.7 million reduction attributed to volume decreases in certain interest-earning assets, predominantly investment securities.reduce liability costs throughout 2009.

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 20072009 was principally impacted by rate related factors. The rate related changes reflected increaseddecreased expense on most interest-bearing demand, money market deposits and short-term borrowings in 2007 offset in part by the2009 coupled with a decline in average volume of savings deposits, timemoney market deposits and borrowings during 2007.2009. For the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, interest expense increased $1.7decreased $1.5 million or 5.726.0 percent as compared with 2006. Interest-bearing2008. During 2009, the Corporation continued to lower rates in concert with the decline in market benchmark rates. The result was an improvement in the Corporation’s cost of funds and net interest spread. Average interest-bearing liabilities in total decreased on average $26.5increased $193.9 million, primarily in CDARS Reciprocal deposits, our Max Plus savings deposits, time depositsproduct and short-termin borrowings.

For the year ended December 31, 2006,2008, interest expense increased $5.7decreased $6.5 million or 24.421.3 percent as compared with 2005.2007. Total interest-bearing liabilities decreasedincreased on average $62.8$15.4 million, primarily in savingsmoney market deposits and short-termin borrowings.

The Corporation’s net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis (i.e., the average yield on average interest-earning assets, calculated on a tax equivalent basis, minus the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities) decreased 25increased 21 basis points to 1.922.79 percent in 20072009 from 2.172.58 percent for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008. The decreaseincrease in 20072009 reflected a compressionan expansion of spreads between yields earned on loans and investments and rates paid for supporting funds. During 2007,2009, spreads narrowedimproved due in part to monetary policy promulgatedmaintained by the FOMC keeping the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) decreasing the target Federal Fundsfunds rate 100 basis points from 5.25at zero to 0.25 percent at December 31, 2006 to 4.25 percent at December 31, 2007throughout 2009 coupled with the resultant flattening and inversiona steepening of the yield curve that occurred during 2007.2009.

The FOMC reduced rates three times during 2007 for a total of 100 basis points and increased rates four times in 2006 for a total of 100 basis points. The net interest spread decreased 32increased 66 basis points in 20062008 as compared with 2005,2007, primarily as a result of an expansion of spreads between yields earned on loans and investments and rates paid for supporting funds. During 2008, spreads improved due in part to the monetary policy promulgated by the FOMC decreasing the target Federal Fundsfunds rate increase during the period400 basis points from a 44-year low of 1.004.25 percent at June 29, 2004.December 31, 2007 to 0.25 percent at December 31, 2008 coupled with a steepening of the yield curve during 2008.

The cost of total average interest-bearing liabilities increaseddecreased to 3.912.28 percent, a changedecrease of 3373 basis points, for the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, from 3.583.01 percent for the year ended December 31, 2006,2008, which followed a changedecrease of 9190 basis points from 2.673.91 percent for the year ended December 31, 2005.2007.

The contribution of non-interest-bearing sources (i.e., the differential between the average rate paid on all sources of funds and the average rate paid on interest-bearing sources) increaseddecreased to 5526 basis points, an increasea decrease of 311 basis points from 20062008 to 2007.2009. Comparing 20062008 and 2005,2007, there was an increasea decrease of 1518 basis pointpoints to 5237 basis points on average from 3755 basis points on average during the year ended December 31, 2005.2007.

The following table, “Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates”, presents for the years ended December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, the Corporation’s average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity. The Corporation’s net interest income, net interest spreads and net interest income as a percentage of interest-earningsinterest-earning assets (net interest margin) are also reflected.

26


TABLE OF CONTENTS

AVERAGE STATEMENTS OF CONDITION WITH INTEREST AND AVERAGE RATES

                  
                  
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
(Tax-Equivalent Basis) Average Balance Income/
Expense		 Yield/
Rate		 Average
Balance		 Income/
Expense		 Yield/Rate Average
Balance		 Income/
Expense		 Yield/
Rate		 Average
Balance		 Income/
Expense		 Yield/
Rate		 Average
Balance		 Income/
Expense		 Yield/
Rate		 Average
Balance		 Income/
Expense		 Yield/
Rate
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
ASSETS
                                                                                          
Interest-earning assets:
                                                                                          
Investment securities:(1)
                                              
Taxable $267,884  $13,728   5.12%  $312,001  $15,752   5.05%  $412,427  $19,199   4.66%  $289,414  $12,727   4.40%  $211,185  $10,529   4.99%  $267,884  $13,728   5.12% 
Non-taxable  95,501   5,527   5.79%   112,831   6,718   5.95%   150,149   8,094   5.39%   25,677   1,499   5.84%   67,890   3,876   5.71%   95,501   5,527   5.79% 
Loans, net of unearned income:(2)  541,297   33,527   6.19%   522,352   31,999   6.13%   454,372   25,329   5.57%   692,562   36,751   5.31%   622,533   36,110   5.80%   541,297   33,527   6.19% 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell  12,050   604   5.01%   10,539   547   5.19%   1,091   29   2.66% 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell  —   —   —   4,047   113   2.79%   12,050   604   5.01% 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  7,806   549   7.03%   8,167   507   6.21%   10,080   397   3.94%   10,526   643   6.11%   10,104   594   5.88%   7,806   549   7.03% 
Total interest-earning assets  924,538   53,935   5.83%   965,890   55,523   5.75%   1,028,119   53,048   5.16%   1,018,179   51,620   5.07%   915,759   51,222   5.59%   924,538   53,935   5.83% 
Non-interest-earning assets:
                                                                                          
Cash and due from banks  18,586             20,711             19,418             128,156             16,063             18,586           
Bank owned life insurance  21,801             20,225             18,200             24,941             22,627             21,801           
Intangible assets  17,259             17,378             11,814             17,069             17,158             17,259           
Other assets  34,547             28,405             28,620             42,980             37,602             34,547           
Allowance for loan losses  (5,002)         (4,932)         (4,534)         (6,916)         (5,681)         (5,002)       
Total non-interest earning assets  87,191         81,787         73,518         206,230         87,769         87,191       
Total assets $1,011,729        $1,047,677        $1,101,637        $1,224,409        $1,003,528        $1,011,729       
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                                                                          
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                                          
Money market deposits $142,805  $6,577   4.61%  $126,502  $4,384   3.47%  $92,875   1,963   2.11%  $123,427  $1,635   1.32%  $150,373  $3,478   2.31%  $142,805  $6,577   4.61% 
Savings deposits  69,289   1,498   2.16%   90,768   1,807   1.99%   114,305   1,610   1.41%   145,536   2,050   1.41%   63,192   550   0.87%   69,289   617   0.89% 
Time deposits  187,860   8,832   4.70%   232,803   9,950   4.27%   227,249   6,766   2.98%   319,639   6,850   2.14%   178,761   6,252   3.50%   187,860   8,832   4.70% 
Other interest-bearing deposits  173,123   3,928   2.27%   119,231   1,864   1.56%   118,881   1,260   1.06%   140,890   1,773   1.26%   131,452   3,007   2.29%   173,123   4,809   2.78% 
Short term borrowings and FHLB advances  205,681   9,384   4.56%   226,004   9,655   4.27%   304,364   10,624   3.49% 
Short-term and long-term borrowings  258,607   10,146   3.92%   270,390   10,501   3.88%   205,681   9,384   4.56% 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   411   7.97%   15,070   1,314   8.72%   15,465   1,073   6.94%   5,155   191   3.71%   5,155   307   5.96%   5,155   411   7.97% 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  783,913   30,630   3.91%   810,378   28,974   3.58%   873,139   23,296   2.67%   993,254   22,645   2.28%   799,323   24,095   3.01%   783,913   30,630   3.91% 
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
                                                                                          
Demand deposits  127,107             135,761             134,837             124,966             114,400             127,107           
Other non-interest-bearing deposits  385             1,470             2,813             333             368             385           
Other liabilities  5,979         3,563         5,076         12,003         6,314         5,979       
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities  133,471         140,794         142,726         137,302         121,082         133,471       
Stockholders’ equity  94,345         96,505         85,772         93,853         83,123         94,345       
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,011,729        $1,047,677        $1,101,637        $1,224,409        $1,003,528        $1,011,729       
Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)    $23,305        $26,549        $29,752         28,975         27,127         23,305    
Net interest spread        1.92%         2.17%         2.49%         2.79%         2.58%         1.92% 
Net interest income as percent of earning assets (margin)        2.52%         2.75%         2.89%         2.85%         2.96%         2.52% 
Tax-equivalent adjustment(3)     (1,806)         (2,198)         (2,545)         (510)         (1,328)         (1,806)    
Net interest income    $21,499        $24,351        $27,207        $28,465        $25,799        $21,499    

(1)Average balances for available-for-sale securities are based on amortized cost.
(2)Average balances for loans include loans on non-accrual status.
(3)The tax-equivalent adjustment was computed based on a statutory Federal income tax rate of 34 percent.

27


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investment Portfolio

For the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, the average volume of investment securities decreasedincreased by $61.4$36.0 million to approximately $363.4$315.1 million or 39.330.9 percent of average earning assets.assets, from $279.1 million on average, or 30.5 percent of average earning assets, in the comparable period in 2008. At December 31, 2007,2009, the total investment portfolio amounted to $314.2$298.1 million, a decreasean increase of $67.5$55.4 million from December 31, 2006.2008. The decreaseincrease in the average volume of investment securities was used in partcontinues to fund loan growth and a decline in funding sources. The decreasemaintain pace with the rise in the average volumeoverall level of earning assets. With the strong deposit growth experienced during 2009 and large buildup of liquidity, the Corporation began to prudently expand the size of its investment securities during 2006 largely reflects a repositioning of the Corporation’s balance sheetportfolio in the first quarter of 2006 coupled with a continued decline in the volume ofan effort to deploy excess cash flow from the portfolio that was reinvested into the portfolioearning assets. At December 31, 2007,2009, the principal components of the investment portfolio are U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government Agency Obligations, Federal Agency Obligations including Mortgage-backedmortgage-backed securities, Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivision, corporate bonds and notes, and other debt and equity securities.

The Corporation’s investment portfolio also consists of overnight investments that were made in the Reserve Primary Fund (the “Fund”), a money market fund registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. On September 22, 2008, the Fund announced that redemptions of shares of the Fund were suspended pursuant to an SEC order so that an orderly liquidation could be effected for the protection of the Fund’s investors. Through December 31, 2009, the Corporation received five distributions from the Fund, totaling approximately 92 percent of its outstanding balance, leaving a remaining outstanding balance in the Fund of $2.943 million. On January 29, 2010, as part of the court ordered liquidation of the Fund, the Corporation received a sixth distribution or $2.446 million, bringing total distributions to date to approximately 99 percent. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $364,000, or approximately 1 percent, other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings relating to this court ordered liquidation of the Fund. The Corporation’s outstanding carrying balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2010 totaled $133,000.

The volume related factors during the twelve-monthtwelve month period ended December 31, 2007 decreased2009 increased investment revenue by $3.3$1.1 million, while rate related changes resulted in an increasea decrease in revenue of $50,000.$1.3 million from December 31, 2008. The tax-equivalent yield on investments remained relatively unchanged increasingdecreased by 165 basis pointpoints to 5.304.51 percent from a yield of 5.295.16 percent during the year ended December 31, 2006. There was some2008. The reductions in the investment portfolio, extension where risk is relatively minimal withinprimarily in the tax-exempt sector, were made to reduce exposure to these particular sectors of the portfolio resulting in wider spreads in certain sectors during 2007, specifically with corporate bondswhile continuing to provide cash flow for loan funding and tax-free municipal securities added to the portfolio during 2007. This favorably impacted the portfolio yield, as compared with 2006.forecasted liability outflows. The yield on the portfolio benefited fromdeclined compared to 2008 due primarily to sales as well as the impact ofthat the higherlower interest rate environment had on purchases made to replacehigher yielding securities whichthat had either matured, were prepaid, or were called andcalled. Improvement in yield has been limited by reinvesting opportunities. Cash flow from the cash flowsecurities was subsequently reinvested, in part, back into the portfolio and used primarily to help fund loan growth.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $140,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge on its Lehman Brothers bond holding. Through June 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment charges taken on this bond amounted to $1,440,000. As part of the Corporation’s tax strategies, management elected to sell the Lehman bond holding during the third quarter of 2009.

The impactCorporation owns two pooled trust preferred securities (“Pooled TRUPS”), which consists of repricing activity on investment yields was also favorably impactedsecurities issued by financial institutions and insurance companies and the change in rates during 2007, dueCorporation holds the mezzanine tranche of such securities. Senior tranches generally are protected from defaults by over-collateralization and cash flow default protection provided by subordinated tranches, with senior tranches having the greatest protection and mezzanine tranches subordinated to the factsenior tranches. One of the Pooled TRUPS has incurred its third interruption of cash flow payments to date. Management reviewed the expected cash flow analysis and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid, and recorded a $1.1 million other-than-temporary impairment charge for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and $2.5 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, which represents 78.7 percent of the par amount of $3.1 million. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $665,000. The other Pooled TRUP incurred its first interruption of cash flow payments in the fourth quarter of 2009. Management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment exists on this security as well and recorded a $1.0 million charge during the fourth quarter of 2009, which represents 32.3 percent of the par amount of $3.0 million. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $2.0 million.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Corporation owns three variable rate private label collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), which were also evaluated for impairment. Management had applied aggressive default rates to identify if any credit impairment exists, as these bonds were downgraded to below investment grade. These bonds are currently paying with no interruption of cash flow. As such, management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment charge exists and recorded a $188,000 writedown to the bonds, which represents 3.4 percent of the par amount of $5.6 million. The new cost basis for these securities has been written down to $5.4 million.

During 2009, the Corporation recorded $113,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to one equity holding in bank stocks. Due to the deterioration in that bank’s financial condition and that near term prospects in market value recovery appear remote, management determined that the increased volume on average during 2007expectation to recover its cost is not temporary. As such, this equity was invested into securities,written down to fair market value at the time of evaluation, which carried a higher rate in comparison to the prior year. The cash flow from the sale of investment securities was in part invested back into the portfolio.December 31, 2009.

Securities available-for-sale isare a part of the Corporation’s interest rate risk management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, liquidity management and other factors. During 2007, approximately $56.3 million in securities were sold fromThe Corporation continues to reposition the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio, a portion of which funded increases in loan volume and a portion of which reduced the volume of short-term borrowings. On November 16, 2007 the Corporation transferred $113.4 million in securities classified as held-to-maturity to its available for sale portfolio resulting in a $459,000 change in value to the book value and $272,000 net of tax adjustment to other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2007, as a result of this action in the fourth quarter of 2007, the entire securities portfolio was available for sale. During 2006, approximately $188.0 million in securities were sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio, a portion of which funded increases in loan volume and a portion of which reduced the volume of short-term borrowings related to the repositioning of the Corporation’s balance sheet in March of 2006. At that time, the Corporation sold from its available for saleinvestment portfolio as part of the restructuring, $86.3 million of available-for-sale securities, which were yielding less than 4 percent. The sale resultedan overall corporate-wide strategy to produce reasonable and consistent margins where feasible, while attempting to limit risks inherent in an after-tax charge of approximately $2.4 million. The proceeds from the sale of securities were utilized to reduce the Corporation’s short-term borrowings and wholesale funding sources by $85.0 million. As a result of this de-leveraging, short-term borrowings were reduced to $98.5 million at March 23, 2006. The Corporation’s sales from its available-for-sale portfolio were made in the ordinary course of business.balance sheet.

At December 31, 2007,2009, the net unrealized loss carried as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in stockholders’ equity, net of tax, amounted to a net unrealized loss of $5.1$8.4 million as compared with a net unrealized loss of $2.5$6.5 million at December 31, 2006,2008, resulting from changes in market conditions and interest rates at period endperiod-end December 31, 2007.2009. As a result of the inactive condition of the markets amidst the financial crisis, the Corporation elected to treat certain securities under a permissible alternate valuation approach at December 31, 2009 and 2008. For additional information regarding the Corporation’s investment portfolio, see Note 74 and Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table illustrates the maturity distribution and weighted average yield on a tax-equivalent basis for investment securities at December 31, 2007,2009, on a contractual maturity basis.

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

          
 U.S.
Treasury
& Agency
Securities		 Federal
Agency
Obligations		 Obligations
of U.S.
States &
Political
Subdivisions		 Other Debt
and Equity
Securities		 Total U.S.
Treasury &
Agency
Securities		 Federal
Agency
Obligations		 Obligations of
U.S. States &
Political
Subdivisions		 Other Debt
and Equity
Securities		 Total
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Due in 1 year or less
                                                  
Amortized Cost $—  $—  $—  $21,014  $21,014  $150  $—  $979  $723  $1,852 
Market Value  —   —   —   20,851   20,851   150   —   981   726   1,857 
Weighted Average Yield  —%   —%   —%   1.98%   1.98%   0.16%   —   2.69%   3.48%   2.79% 
Due after one year through five years
                                                  
Amortized Cost $100  $5,224  $19,697  $9,280  $34,301  $—  $—  $4,103  $3,000  $7,103 
Market Value  101   5,194   19,664   9,237   34,196   —   —   4,132   2,100   6,232 
Weighted Average Yield  4.74%   4.31%   3.42%   5.84%   4.21%   —   —   3.57%   2.80%   3.24% 
Due after five years through ten years
                                                  
Amortized Cost $—  $58,381  $32,241  $17,794  $108,416  $1,939  $23,506  $4,253  $22,957  $52,655 
Market Value  —   57,954   32,239   17,794   107,987   1,939   23,226   4,255   21,930   51,350 
Weighted Average Yield  —%   4.35%   3.75%   5.74%   4.40%   3.72%   3.13%   3.89%   4.70%   3.90% 
Due after ten years
                                                  
Amortized Cost $—  $46,370  $31,308  $80,744  $158,422  $—  $193,134  $10,353  $46,977  $250,464 
Market Value  —   45,843   31,434   73,883   151,160   —   191,359   9,913   37,413   238,685 
Weighted Average Yield  —%   4.71%   4.09%   6.39%   5.44%   —   4.06%   4.10%   4.57%   4.16% 
Total
                                                  
Amortized Cost $100  $109,975  $83,246  $128,832  $322,153  $2,089  $216,640  $19,688  $73,657  $312,074 
Market Value  101   108,991   83,337   121,765   314,194   2,089   214,585   19,281   62,169   298,124 
Weighted Average Yield  4.74%   4.46%   3.80%   5.86%   4.52%   3.46%   3.96%   3.87%   4.53%   4.08% 

For information regarding the carrying value of the investment portfolio, see Note 74 and Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The securities listed in the table above are either rated investment grade by Moody’s and/or Standard and Poor’s or have shadow credit ratings from a credit agency supporting investment grade and conform to the Corporation’s investment policy guidelines. There were no municipal securities of any single issuer exceeding 10 percent of stockholders’ equity at the end of 2007.2009.

Equity securities included in other debt and equity securities do not have a contractual maturity and are included in the Due after ten years maturity in the table above.

The following table sets forth the carrying value of the Corporation’s investment securities, both available for sale and held to maturity, as of December 31 for each of the last three years.

      
 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                              
U.S. Treasury & Agency Securities $101  $100  $582  $2,089  $100  $101 
Federal Agency Obligations  108,991   103,649   209,379   214,585   82,797   108,991 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions  83,337   27,656   44,805   19,281   52,094   83,337 
Trust Preferred Securities  26,715   31,771   30,468 
Other debt securities  113,946   97,839   107,552   29,921   59,362   83,478 
Other equity securities  7,819   21,359   14,898   5,533   16,590   7,819 
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale $314,194  $250,603  $377,216  $298,124  $242,714  $314,194 
Securities Held-to-Maturity:
               
U.S. Treasury & Agency Securities $—  $511  $1,122 
Federal Agency Obligations  —   30,056   33,577 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions  —   58,780   60,004 
Other debt securities  —   41,783   45,811 
Total Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity $—  $131,130  $140,514 
Total Investment Securities $314,194  $381,733  $517,730 

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For other information regarding the Corporation’s investment securities portfolio, see Note 74 and Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Loan Portfolio

Lending is one of the Corporation’s primary business activities. The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of both retail and commercial loans, serving the diverse customer base in its market area. The composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio continues to change due to the local economy. Factors such as the economic climate, interest rates, real estate values and employment all contribute to these changes. Loan growth has been generated through business development efforts via repeat customer business and entry, through branching, into new markets.borrower requests.

At December 31, 2007,2009, total loans amounted to $551.7$715.5 million, an increase of 0.235.8 percent or $1.3$39.3 million as compared to December 31, 2006.2008. The $0.6 million or 1.8 percent increase in interest income on loans for the twelve months ended December 31, 20072009 was the result of the increase in volume during 2009, offset in part by a lower interest ratesrate environment as compared with 2006, lessened to some extent by the competitive rate pricing structure maintained by2008. Even though the Corporation continues to attract new loans and further by thebe challenged with heightened competition for lending relationships that exists in the Corporation’s market.within its market, strong growth has been achieved through successful lending sales efforts to build on continued customer relationships while striving to maintain asset quality and underwriting standards. The FOMC decreased the target Federal Funds Rate threerate seven times during 20072008 to 4.25zero to 0.25 percent from 5.25 percentand the target rate has remained at December 31, 2006. Average loan growth during the year ended December 31, 2006 occurred primarily in the commercial related categories of the loan portfolio. The Red Oak Bank merger in May 2005 contributed to the average mix and net growth of the loan portfolio in 2006 over 2005.this level throughout 2009.

Total average loan volume increased $19.0$70.1 million or 3.6311.2 percent in 2007,2009, while the portfolio yield increaseddecreased by 649 basis points as compared with 2006.2008. The increased total average loan volume was due primarily to increased repeat customer activity and new lending relationships. The volume related factors during the period contributed increased revenue of $1.2$3.9 million, while the rate related changes contributed $358,000.decreased revenue by $3.2 million. Total average loan volume increased to $541.3$692.6 million with a net interest yield of 6.195.31 percent, as compared to $522.4$622.5 million with a yield of 6.135.80 percent for the year ended December 31, 2006.2008. The Corporation seeks to create growth in commercial lending by offering products and competitive pricing and by capitalizing on the positive trendsnew and existing relationships in its market area. Products are offered to meet the financial requirements of the Corporation’s clients. It is the objective of the Corporation’s credit policies to diversify the commercial loan portfolio to limit concentrations in any single industry.

The following table presents information regarding the components of the Corporation’s loan portfolio on the dates indicated.

     
 December 31,
   2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial $284,849  $280,223  $243,847  $150,281  $127,307 
Real estate residential mortgage  266,251   269,486   261,028   221,893   214,482 
Installment  569   705   951   5,130   7,736 
Total  551,669   550,414   505,826   377,304   349,525 
Less:
                         
Allowance for loan losses  5,163   4,960   4,937   3,781   3,002 
Net total $546,506  $545,454  $500,889  $373,523  $346,523 
     
 December 31,
   2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Real estate – residential mortgage $191,199  $240,885  $266,251  $269,486  $261,028 
Real estate – commercial mortgage  405,903   358,394   219,356   206,044   164,841 
Commercial and industrial  117,912   75,415   65,493   74,179   79,006 
Installment  439   1,509   569   705   951 
Total loans  715,453   676,203   551,669   550,414   505,826 
Less:
                         
Allowance for loan losses  8,275   6,254   5,163   4,960   4,937 
Net loans $707,178  $669,949  $546,506  $545,454  $500,889 

Since 2003,Included in the loan balances above are net deferred loan costs of $391,000, $572,000 and $579,000 at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Over the past five years, demand for the Bank’s commercial loan,and commercial real estate and real estate mortgageloan products has improved.increased.

The increase in commercial loans in 20072009 was a result of the expansion of the Corporation’s customer base, which provided access to new markets, aggressive business development and marketing programs coupled with positive market trends for the Corporation. While certain sectors of the markets, such as consumer real estate products, lagged as the market conditions changed andduring most of 2008, the refinancing boom, which startedCorporation experienced an increase in 2005, peaked and startedits lending sales efforts during 2009 as it continued to wane in 2007, the commercial sectors of the portfolio benefitedbenefit from the Corporation’s primary core customer base.

30


TABLE OF CONTENTS

In 2005, increases in commercial loans were also as a result of continued business demand coupled with the loans acquired from the merger with Red Oak Bank. In 2006, the increase in residential mortgage loans is attributable to the prevailing interest rate environment that spurred increased refinancing activity in the market.

Average commercial loans, which include commercial real estate and construction, increased to $275.9$476.1 million or by approximately $15.2$110.6 million or 5.830.1 percent in 2007 as2009 compared with 2006.2008. The Corporation seeks to create growth in the commercial lending sector by offering competitive products and pricing and by capitalizing on the positive trendsnew relationships in its market area. Over the last several years, the expansion of the Bank’s marketplace has aided in this growth. Products are offered to meet the financial requirements of the Corporation’s clients. It is an objective of the Corporation’s credit policies to diversify the commercial loan portfolio to limit concentrations in any single industry.

The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio includes, in addition to real estate development, loans to the manufacturing, services, automobile, professional and retail trade sectors, and to specialized borrowers, such as operators of private educational facilities, for example. A large proportion of the Corporation’s commercial loans have interest rates which reprice with changes in short-term market interest rates or mature in one year or less.

Average commercial real estate loans, which amounted to $136.8$269.3 million in 2007,2009, increased $7.8$58.0 million or 6.027.5 percent as compared with average commercial real estate loans of $129.0$211.3 million in 20062008 (which reflected a 20.654.5 percent increase over 2005)2007). The Corporation’s long-term mortgage portfolio includes both residential and commercial financing. Growth during the past two years largely reflected brisk activity in new lending activity and mortgage financing. The interest rates on a portion of the Corporation’s commercial mortgages adjust to changes in indices such as the 5 and 10-year Treasury Notes, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York 5 and 10-year advance rate. Interest rate changes usually occur at each five-year anniversary of the loan.

The average volume of residential mortgage loans, including home equity loans, in 2007 remained stable2009 declined $39.8 million or 15.6 percent as compared to 2006. The stability in average volume2008. During 2009, residential loan growth was attributable toaffected by the slowdown in the housing market, in 2006 and 2007 and, to some extent, the origination and sale of loans carrying more unusual terms and conditions that the Corporation did not want to retain in its portfolio, such as forty year terms and interest only loans. During 2003 through 2004, residential loan growth was affected bybrisk refinancing activity into fixed rate loans due principally to the current historic low rate environment and competition among lenders and lower interest rates. In 2004 and 2005, this was mitigated to some extent, by the promotion of variable interest rate products including a 10-year amortizing mortgage, 7/1 adjustable rate mortgage and an aggressive promotional campaign for home equity lines of credit, which resulted in increased volumes in these categories of loans. The momentum of 2004 carried over into the beginning of 2005 as more variable rate products were promoted, including 3/1 and 5/1 adjustable rate mortgages.lenders. Fixed rate residential and home equity loans becamehave recently become a popular choice foramong homeowners, during 2005either through refinancing or new loans, as interest rates began to rise and consumers lookedwish to lock in historically low fixed rates. However, that enthusiasm diminished in 2006 and 2007, contributing to some of the slowing of growth.

Average construction loans and other temporary mortgage financing decreasedincreased from 20062008 to 20072009 by $1.9$1.4 million to $54.3$49.4 million. The average volume of such loans increaseddecreased by $30.5$6.3 million from 20052007 to 2006.2008. The change in construction and other temporary mortgage lending in 20062009 was generated by thea slowdown in market activity of the Corporation’s customers, several of whom engage in residential and commercial development throughout New Jersey. Interest rates on such mortgages are generally tied to key short-term market interest rates. Funds are typically advanced to the builder or developer during various stages of construction and upon completion of the project, itproject. It is contemplated that the loans will be repaid by cash flows derived from sales within the project or, where appropriate, conversion to permanent financing.

Loans to individuals include personal loans, student loans, and home improvement loans, as well as financing for automobiles and other vehicles. Such loans averaged $881,000$773,000 in 2007, as2009, compared with $927,000$973,000 in 20062008 and $1.5$881,000 million in 2005.2007. The decrease in loans to individuals during 2007 and 20062009 was due in part to decreases in volumes of new personal loans (single-pay), and in part by declines in volumes of new automobile loans, as a result of aggressive marketing campaigns by automobile manufacturers and other market providers of such loans to consumers..

Home equity loans, inclusive of home equity lines, as well as traditional secondary mortgage loans, have become popular with consumers due to their tax advantages over other forms of consumer borrowing. Home

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

equity loans and secondary mortgages averaged $28.0$82.2 million in 2007,2009, a decrease of $5.3$27.4 million or 16.025.0 percent as compared withto an average home equity loans of $33.4$109.6 million in 20062008 and $45.4$111.4 million in 2005.2007. Interest rates on floating rate home equity lines are generally tied to the prime rate while most other loans to individuals, including fixed rate home equity loans, are medium-term (ranging between one-to-ten years) and carry fixed interest rates. The decrease in home equity linesloans outstanding during 20072009 was due in part to prime rate increases totaling 2.00 percentage points since the beginning of 2005recent slowdown in reaction to the FOMC increasing the Federal Funds target rate eight times in 2005housing market and four times in 2006, a quarter point each time, while decreasing the rate three times by 1.00 percentage point since September 2007, which prompted consumers to seek fixed rate loans. Thelower consumer spending. Additionally, floating rate home equity lines and close-end fixed rate home equity loans became less attractive andduring 2009 as consumers were pronetook advantage of historically low interest rates or opted to converttake advantage of converting these loan balances into fixed rate loan products, or to simply pay them off.products.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

At December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation had total lendingloan commitments outstanding of $175.9$167.5 million, of which approximately 55.063.7 percent were for commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and construction loans.

The maturities of loans at December 31, 20072009 are listed below.

        
 At December 31, 2007, Maturing At December 31, 2009, Maturing
 In One Year
Or Less		 After One Year
Through
Five Years		 After
Five Years		 Total In
One Year
or Less		 After
One Year
through
Five Years		 After
Five Years		 Total
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Construction loans $46,789  $4,570  $—  $51,359  $25,918  $14,028  $7,000  $46,946 
Commercial real estate loans  28,776   84,244   24,453   137,473   47,241   168,302   143,414   358,957 
Commercial loans  42,385   33,035   20,468   95,888   59,927   48,644   9,341   117,912 
All other loans  28,541   38,809   199,599   266,949   42,013   24,488   125,137   191,638 
Total $146,491  $160,658  $244,520  $551,669  $175,099  $255,462  $284,892  $715,453 
Loans with:
                                        
Fixed rates  31,571   47,139   218,255   296,965  $47,258  $98,739  $258,834  $404,831 
Variable rates  114,920   113,519   26,265   254,704   127,841   156,723   26,058   310,622 
Total $146,491  $160,658  $244,520  $551,669  $175,099  $255,462  $284,892  $715,453 

For additional information regarding loans, see Note 85 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The purpose of the allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is to absorb the impact of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through provisions charged against current operations and through recoveries made on loans previously charged-off. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount considered adequate by management to provide for potential credit losses based upon a periodic evaluation of the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. In establishing an appropriate allowance, an assessment of the individual borrowers, a determination of the value of the underlying collateral, a review of historical loss experience and an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories, delinquencies and problem loans are considered. Such factors as the level and trend of interest rates, and current economic conditions and peer group statistics are also reviewed. At year-end 2007,2009, the level of the allowance was $5,163,000$8,275,000 as compared to a level of $4,960,000$6,254,000 at December 31, 2006.2008. The Corporation made loan loss provisions of $3,261,000 in 2009 compared with $1,561,000 in 2008 and $350,000 in 2007 compared with $57,000 in 2006 and none in 2005.2007. The level of the allowance during the respective annual periods of 20072009 and 20062008 reflects the change in average volume, credit quality within the loan portfolio, the level of charge-offs, loan volume recorded during the periods and the Corporation’s focus on the changing composition of the commercial and residential real estate loan portfolios.

At December 31, 2007,2009, the allowance for loan losses amounted to 0.941.16 percent of total loans. In management’s view, the level of the allowance at December 31, 2007,2009 is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment regarding the adequacy of the allowance constitutes a “Forward

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Looking Statement” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from management’s analysis, based principally upon the factors considered by management in establishing the allowance.

Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate, which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to increase the allowance based on their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the majority of the Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate in the State of New Jersey. Future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic factors impacting New Jersey real estate and further deterioration of the economic climate as


TABLE OF CONTENTS

well as operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans amounted to 0.941.16 percent, 0.900.92 percent and 0.980.94 percent at December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, respectively.

Net charge-offs were $1,240,000 in 2009, $470,000 in 2008 and $147,000 in 2007, $34,000 in 2006 and $54,000 in 2005.2007. During 2007,2009, the Corporation experienced an increase in the volume of charge-offs incompared to 2008, principally related to charge-offs taken on four commercial and commercial real estate credits during the fourth quarter of 2009 totaling $1.1 million, coupled with a $900,000 charge-off in connection with a $5.1 million commercial real estate construction project of industrial loanswarehouses, which was placed in non-accrual status during the first quarter of 2009. As previously disclosed, during the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation took steps to terminate a participation agreement with another New Jersey bank, as the participation ended on December 31, 2009. The other bank objected to the Corporation’s interpretation of the agreement and write downs on residential loans prior to their transfersubsequent actions. Accordingly, the Corporation filed suit for the return of the outstanding principal and reclassified the outstanding loan into other real estate owned compared to 2006 and 2005 levels, which were attributable toassets on its balance sheet. As such, a $900,000 recovery was recorded during the increase in interest rates and a higher levelfourth quarter of personal bankruptcies.2009 associated with this termination of the participation agreement.

Five-Year Statistical Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table reflects the relationship of loan volume, the provision and allowance for loan losses and net charge-offs (recoveries) for the past five years.

          
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Average loans outstanding $541,297  $522,352  $454,372  $365,104  $276,457  $692,562  $622,533  $541,297  $522,352  $454,372 
Total loans at end of period $551,669  $550,414  $505,826  $377,304  $349,525  $715,453  $676,203  $551,669  $550,414  $505,826 
Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses
                                                  
Balance at the beginning of year $4,960  $4,937  $3,781  $3,002  $2,498  $6,254  $5,163  $4,960  $4,937  $3,781 
Charge-offs:
                                                  
Commercial  45   —   49   —   —   2,122   50   45   —   49 
Residential  80   —   —   —   —   4   414   80   —   — 
Installment loans  31   79   33   11   39   26   35   31   79   33 
Total charge-offs  156   79   82   11   39   2,152   499   156   79   82 
Recoveries:
                                                  
Commercial  2   19   —   —   —   902   10   2   19   — 
Residential  4   —   —   —   — 
Installment loans  7   26   28   38   21   6   19   7   26   28 
Total recoveries  9   45   28   38   21   912   29   9   45   28 
Net charge-offs (recoveries)  147   34   54   (27)   18   1,240   470   147   34   54 
Addition of Red Oak Bank’s allowance – May 20, 2005  —   —   1,210   —   — 
Addition of Red Oak Bank’s allowance  —   —   —   —   1,210 
Provision for loan losses  350   57   —   752   522   3,261   1,561   350   57   — 
Balance at end of year $5,163  $4,960  $4,937  $3,781  $3,002  $8,275  $6,254  $5,163  $4,960  $4,937 
Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average loans outstanding during the year  0.03%   0.01%   0.01%   N/M   0.01%   0.18%   0.08%   0.03%   0.01%   0.01% 
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans at end of year  0.94%   0.90%   0.98%   1.00%   0.86%   1.16%   0.92%   0.94%   0.90%   0.98% 

33


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Implicit in the lending function is the fact that loan losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower and prevailing economic conditions. The allowance for loan losses has been allocated in the table below according to the estimated amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to provide for the possibility of losses being incurred within the following categories of loans at December 31, for each of the past five years.

The table below shows, for three types of loans, the amounts of the allowance allocable to such loans and the percentage of such loans to total loans. The percentage of loans to total loans is based upon the classification of loans shown on page 30 of this report.

                
 Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Installment Unallocated Commercial Real Estate
Residential Mortgage		 Installment Unallocated
 Amount of Allowance Loans to Total Loans % Amount of Allowance Loans to Total Loans % Amount of
Allowance		 Loans to Total Loans % Amount of Allowance Total Amount of
Allowance		 Loans to
Total Loans
%		 Amount of
Allowance		 Loans to
Total Loans
%		 Amount of
Allowance		 Loans to
Total Loans
%		 Amount of
Allowance		 Total
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
2009 $6,532   73.2  $1,312   26.6  $56   0.2  $375  $8,275 
2008  5,473   64.2   651   35.6   60   0.2   70   6,254 
2007 $4,167   51.6  $727   48.3  $49   0.1  $220  $5,163   4,167   51.6   727   48.3   49   0.1   220   5,163 
2006 $3,972   50.9  $707   49.0  $45   0.1  $236  $4,960   3,972   50.9   707   49.0   45   0.1   236   4,960 
2005 $3,453   48.2  $594   51.6  $55   0.2  $835  $4,937   3,453   48.2   594   51.6   55   0.2   835   4,937 
2004 $2,561   39.8  $744   58.8  $8   1.4  $468  $3,781 
2003 $1,763   38.6  $986   59.2  $80   2.2  $173  $3,002 

Asset Quality

The Corporation manages asset quality and credit risk by maintaining diversification in its loan portfolio and through review processes that include analysis of credit requests and ongoing examination of outstanding loans and delinquencies, with particular attention to portfolio dynamics and mix. The Corporation strives to identify loans experiencing difficulty early enough to correct the problems, to record charge-offs promptly based on realistic assessments of current collateral values, and to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at all times. These practices have protected the Corporation during economic downturns and periods of uncertainty.

It is generally the Corporation’s policy to discontinue interest accruals once a loan is past due as to interest or principal payments for a period of ninety days. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected and a satisfactory period of ongoing repayment.repayment exists. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are generally well secured and in the process of collection.

Non-Performing and Past Due Loans and OREO

Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans, accruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more and troubled debt restructuring.restructurings. Non-accrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been suspended. It is the Corporation’s general policy to consider the charge-off of loans when they become contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments or when other internal or external factors indicate that collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Troubled debt restructurings represent loans on which a concession was granted to a borrower, such as a reduction in interest rate which is lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risks. At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had approximately $501,000 in OREO. The Corporation did not have any OREO at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The OREO at December 31, 2007 consisted of two residential properties.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth, as of the dates indicated, the amount of the Corporation’s non-accrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more, troubled debt restructurings and OREO. The Corporation had no restructured loans on any of such dates.

34

TABLE OF CONTENTSother real estate owned (“OREO”).

          
 At December 31, At December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Non-accrual loans $3,907  $475  $387  $—  $26  $7,092  $541  $3,907  $475  $387 
Accruing loans past due
90 days or more		  39   139   —   225   179 
Troubled debt restructuring  —   —   —   —   —   966   93   —   —   — 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more  —   225   179   —   — 
Total non-performing loans  8,097   773   3,907   700   566 
OREO  501   —   —   —   —   —   3,949   501   —   — 
Total non-performing assets $4,408  $700  $566  $—  $26  $8,097  $4,722  $4,408  $700  $566 

The increase in non-accrual loans of $3.4$6.6 million in 20072009 from 2008 was primarily relatedattributable to the addition of three large commercial credits. In March of 2009, one commercial real estate construction project of industrial warehouses was downgraded to non-accrual status. The loan was a participation loan with another New Jersey bank. In December of 2009, the Corporation took steps to terminate this participation agreement, as the participation ended on December 31, 2009. The Corporation filed suit for the return of the outstanding principal and has reclassified this $5.1 million outstanding loan into other assets on the Corporation’s balance sheet. The $966,000 carried as a troubled debt restructuring represents the total modified amount required to be paid by two different one-to-four family residential developers and four one-to-four family residential mortgage and one commercial loan. All of thesehomeowners. The repayment terms are restructured to meet each borrower’s financial circumstances. These loans are secured by real estate secured. located in New Jersey.

The Corporation has received full paymentcomponents of the commercial mortgage, including principal of $2.5 million and interest of $83,277, all of which will be reflected in the results for the first quarter of 2008. In 2006, non-accrual loans increased $88,000 from $387,000 reported at December 31, 2005, which were comprised of two business loans and three consumer loans. The Corporation continues to aggressively pursue the sale of other real estate owned and currently has a contract of sale on one of the properties in the amount of $360,000. These actions support our strong credit quality and would bring total non-performing loans to $1.5 million or .14% of total assets.

Accruingaccruing loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest payments are as follows:

          
 December 31, December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial $   —  $225  $179  $   —  $   —  $  —  $—  $  —  $225  $179 
Residential  39   139   —   —   — 
Installment  —   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   — 
Total accruing loans 90 days or more past due $—  $225  $179  $—  $—  $39  $139  $—  $225  $179 

Other known “potential problem loans” (as defined by SEC regulations) as of December 31, 20072009 have been identified and internally risk rated as other assets especially mentioned or substandard. Such loans which include non-accrual loans, amounted to $9,683,000, $2,089,000$20,048,000, $9,401,000 and $4,923,000$5,776,000 at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively. The increase at December 31, 2009 reflects continued deterioration in the quality of certain loans. The risk rating of assets is a dynamic environment wherein through on-going examination certain assets may be downgraded or upgraded as circumstances warrant. The Corporation’s construction portfolio experienced a decline in potential problem loans from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 as the addition of one new relationship of $3.6 million was offset by the removal of another relationship amounting to $4.7 million. The Corporation’s commercial portfolio experienced an increase in potential problem loans with the addition of six lending relationships while shedding two for a net increase of $12.7 million in this segment. This increase was mitigated somewhat by principal payments made on many of these accounts. All such loans are currently performing. The Corporation has no foreign loans. The change in internally risk rated assets at December 31, 2007 was attributable to weakness in certain construction projects and with an automobile dealership as well as the relationship described above that was paid in full early in

During the first quarter of 2008.2010, the Corporation reevaluated several loans which resulted in the downgrade of two lending relationships totaling $4.8 million into risk rating categories associated with “potential problem loans” that had not previously been characterized as such by the Corporation. Further, $725,000 was placed on non-accrual status.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

At December 31, 2007,2009, other than the loans set forth above, the Corporation is not aware of any loans which present serious doubts as to the ability of its borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which are expected to fall into one of the categories set forth in the tables or description above.

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had no OREO, as compared with approximately $3.9 million at December 31, 2008 and approximately $501,000 at December 31, 2007. The decrease in the OREO balance from December 31, 2008 represented a writedown of the carrying value and the subsequent sale of a residential condominium project during the third quarter of 2009.

In general, it is the policy of management to consider the charge-off of loans at the point that they become past due in excess of 90 days, with the exception of loans that are secured by cash, or marketable securities or mortgagereal estate loans, which are well secured and in the process of foreclosure.collection.

With respect to concentrations of credit within the Corporation’s loan portfolio of credits at December 31, 2007, $43.62009, $22.6 million of the commercial loan portfolio or 15.35.2 percent of $284.8$430.3 million, represented outstanding working capital loans to various real estate developers. All but $16.3$8.0 million of these loans are secured by mortgages on land and on buildings under construction.

For additional information regarding risk elements in the Corporation’s loan portfolio, see Note 85 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Income

The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS2009.

      
 Years Ended December 31,
   2007 2006 % Change 2006 2005 % Change
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Service charges, commissions and fees $1,824  $1,759   3.70  $1,759  $1,922   (8.48) 
Other income  457   454   0.66   454   631   (28.05) 
Annuity & insurance commissions  298   205   45.37   205   193   6.22 
Bank Owned Life Insurance  893   780   14.49   780   740   5.41 
Net gains (losses) on securities sold  900   (2,565)   135.09   (2,565)   350   (832.86) 
Total other non-interest income $4,372  $633   590.68  $633  $3,836   (83.50) 
      
 Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 %
Change		 2008 2007 %
Change
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Service charges, commissions and fees $ 1,835  $2,015   (8.93)  $2,015  $ 1,824   10.47 
Annuity & insurance commissions  126   112   12.50   112   298   (62.42) 
Bank-owned life insurance  1,156   1,203   (3.91)   1,203   893   34.71 
Net securities gains (losses)  491   (1,106)   144.39   (1,106)   900   (222.89) 
Other  298   420   (29.05)   420   457   (8.10) 
Total other income $3,906  $2,644   47.73  $2,644  $4,372   (39.52) 

For the twelve-monthsyear ended December 31, 2007,2009, total non-interestother income increased $3.7$1.3 million as compared with the twelve-months of 2006,to 2008, primarily as a result of increasesnet securities gains compared to net securities losses in gains on securities sold.2008. Excluding net securities gains and losses in the respective periods, the Corporation recorded other income of $3.5$3.4 million in the twelve-monthsyear ended December 31, 2007,2009, compared to $3.2$3.8 million in the twelve-months ended December 31, 2006.2008, a decrease of 8.9 percent. This increasedecrease was primarily attributable to a $206,000 increase$180,000 decrease in service charges, commissions from sales of mutual funds and annuitiesfees as well as an increaselower other income, resulting primarily from lower letters of credit fee income and title insurance income. Additionally, in bank owned2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $136,000 and $230,000, respectively, in tax-free proceeds in excess of contract value on the Corporation’s bank-owned life insurance income. The $65,000 or 3.70 percent, increase in service charges is relateddue to higher overdraft fees and service charge income on deposit accounts as compared with 2006.the death of insured participants.

During 2007,2009, the Corporation recorded net securities gains of $491,000 compared to net securities losses of $1.1 million in 2008 and net gains of $900,000 recorded in 2007. In 2009, total other-than-temporary impairment charges of $4.2 million were more than offset by net gains on securities sold fromof $4.7 million. These impairment charges consisted of $3.4 million relating to two pooled trust preferred securities, $364,000 relating to the available-for-saleCorporation’s investment in the Reserve Primary Fund, $188,000 relating to three variable rate private label CMOs, a $140,000 charge relating to the Corporation’s Lehman Brothers bond and held-to-maturity investment portfolio compareda $113,000 writedown relating to one equity holding in bank stocks. In 2008, total other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.8 million were partially offset by net lossesgains on securities sold of $2.6$655,000. During 2008, the Corporation recorded a $1.3 million other-than-temporary impairment charge related to its Lehman Brothers corporate bond and $461,000 of writedowns related to three equity holdings in 2006 and gains of $350,000 recorded in 2005.bank stocks. In 2007 and 2005,2009, the sales of securities were made in the normal course of business and proceeds were primarily reinvested into the loan portfolio


TABLE OF CONTENTS

and used to reduce short-term borrowings. Theinvestment portfolios. In 2008 and 2007, the sales in 2006of securities were made as partin the normal course of business and proceeds were primarily reinvested into the Corporation’s decision to reposition its statement of condition to improve the Corporation’s interest rate profile as the proceeds from the sales were used principally to reduce borrowings.loan portfolio.

Other Expense

Total non-interestother expense includes salarysalaries and employee benefits, net occupancy expense, premises and equipment expense, professional and consulting expense, stationery and printing expense, marketing and advertising expense, computer expense and other operating expense. Other operating expense includes such expenses as telephone, insurance, audit, bank correspondent fees and the amortization of core deposit intangibles.

The following table presents the principal categories of other expense for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009.

      
 Year Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 %
Change		 2008 2007 %
Change
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits $9,915  $8,505   16.58  $8,505  $11,436   (25.63) 
Occupancy, net  2,536   3,279   (22.66)   3,279   2,843   15.34 
Premises and equipment  1,263   1,436   (12.05)   1,436   1,777   (19.19) 
FDIC Insurance  2,055   217   847.00   217   86   152.33 
Professional and consulting  811   703   15.36   703   2,139   (67.13) 
Stationery and printing  339   397   (14.61)   397   465   (14.62) 
Marketing and advertising  366   637   (42.54)   637   603   5.64 
Computer expense  964   834   15.59   834   614   35.83 
OREO Expense, net  1,438   31   4538.71   31   110   (71.82) 
Other  3,370   3,434   (1.86)   3,434   4,525   (24.11) 
Total other expense $23,057  $19,473   18.40  $19,473  $24,598   (20.84) 

Total other expense increased $3.6 million, or 18.4 percent, in 2009 from 2008 as compared with a decrease of $5.1 million, or 20.8 percent, from 2007 to 2008. The level of operating expenses during 2009 increased in three major expense categories, with the largest increases occurring in FDIC insurance, up $1.8 million, OREO expenses, up $1.4 million and salaries and employee benefits, up $1.4 million. Total other expense decreased in 2008 from 2007 across several expense categories, with the largest decrease occurring in salaries and benefit expense.

On October 25, 2007, the Corporation announced that the Boards of Directors of the Corporation and Beacon Trust Company mutually agreed to terminate their Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 15, 2007. Concurrently, the parties agreed to a dismissal of litigation commenced by Beacon Trust Company in October 2007 to compel consummation of the merger. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Corporation recognized merger-related expenses, reflecting the cost of the transaction from the outset of negotiations, in an amount of approximately $600,000.

Non-interest expense in 2005 includes a partial year of the operating expenses of Red Oak Bank since its acquisition on May 20, 2005. These expenses include the costs related to the operation of one branch acquired, which was also Red Oak Bank’s administration building. Other costs resulting from the acquisition include occupancy and bank premises expense, increased audit, marketing and advertising expenses and increased computer related expenses related to the integration of Red Oak Bank into Union Center National Bank.

The following table presents the principal categories of non-interest expense for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.

36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

      
 Year Ended December 31,
   2007 2006 % Change 2006 2005 % Change
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits $11,436  $12,290   (6.95)  $12,290  $12,108   1.50 
Occupancy, net  2,843   2,309   23.13   2,309   2,165   6.65 
Premises and equipment  1,777   1,940   (8.40)   1,940   1,990   (2.51) 
Professional and consulting  2,139   1,179   81.42   1,179   555   112.43 
Stationery and printing  465   692   (32.80)   692   628   10.19 
Marketing and advertising  603   731   (17.51)   731   644   13.51 
Computer  614   741   (17.14)   741   594   24.75 
Other  4,721   4,476   5.47   4,476   3,529   26.83 
Total non-interest expense $24,598  $24,358   0.99  $24,358  $22,213   9.66 

Total non-interest expense increased $240,000 or 0.99 percent in 2007 from 2006 as compared with an increase of $2.15 million or 9.66 percent from 2005 to 2006. The level of operating expenses during 2007 increased in several expense categories, although the principal increase of $960,000 involved professional and consulting expenses that were primarily related to the legal, professional and consulting fees associated with the termination of the Beacon Trust acquisition and the 2007 annual meeting and proxy contest. Expenses were limited by a decline in staffing levels and pension curtailment, including a $1.2 million benefit resulting from the Corporation freezing its defined benefit pension plan. This was offset by one-time charges for salary and benefit expense amounting to $1.6 million related to severance payments.

Prudent management of operating expenses has and will continue to be a key objective of management in an effort to improve earnings performance. The Corporation’s ratio of other expenses to average assets increaseddecreased to 1.88 percent in 2009 compared to 1.94 percent in 2008 and 2.43 percent in 2007 compared to 2.32 percent in 2006 and 2.02 percent in 2005.2007.

Salaries and employee benefits decreased $854,000increased $1.4 million or 6.9516.6 percent in 20072009 compared to 20062008 and increased $182,000decreased $2.9 million or 1.5025.6 percent from 20052007 to 2006.2008. The decreaseincrease in 20072009 was primarily attributable to a $755,000 benefit recognized in 2008 relating to the reductiontermination of two benefit plans. During the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation recognized a $272,000 benefit relating to the lump-sum payment and termination of the directors retirement plan. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Corporation recognized a $483,000 benefit relating to a lump-sum payment and termination of a benefit equalization plan. These benefits represented the difference between the actuarial present value of the lump-sum payment and the accrued liability previously recorded on the Corporation’s statement of condition. Additionally, pension plan expense increased $514,000 in workforce completed during2009 from 2008 due to both lower asset valuations and a lower expected rate of return on the year.Corporation’s defined pension plan, which was frozen back in 2007. On August 9, 2007, the Corporation announced that as


TABLE OF CONTENTS

part of its ongoing effort to reduce operating expense, it had frozen its defined benefit pension plan and that it redesigned its 401(k) savings plan, effective September 30, 2007. The changes were consistent with cost reduction strategies and a shift in the focus of future savings of retirement benefits toward the more predictable cost structure of a 401(k) plan and away from the legacy costs of a defined benefit pension plan. The changes included stopping the accrual of future benefits in the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan, and fully preserving all retirement benefits that employees will have earned as of September 30, 2007; and redesigning itsthe Corporation’s 401(k) plan by granting current pension plan participants an annual company-funded matching contribution of as much as 6 percent of their pay, which is an increase from the existing 3 percent match. As a result, the Corporation recorded a one-time pre-tax benefit related to these pension plan changes of approximately $1.161$1.2 million in the third quarter of 2007, reflecting the curtailment of the defined benefit plan. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the plan changes resulted in retirement-related expense savings of $1.227$1.2 million.

Salaries and employee benefits accounted for 46.4943.0 percent of total non-interest expense in 2007,2009, as compared to 50.4643.7 percent and 54.5146.5 percent in 20062008 and 2005,2007, respectively.

Staffing levels overall decreasedIn 2009, the Corporation announced a strategic outsourcing agreement with Fiserv to 172 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2007 comparedprovide core account processing services, which is consistent with the Corporation’s other strategic initiatives to 214 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2006streamline operations, reduce operating overhead and 202 at December 31, 2005.allow the Corporation to focus on core competencies of customer service and product development. The core processing transition was consummated during the fourth quarter of 2009. In 2008, the Corporation announced a series of strategic outsourcing agreements to aid in the realization of its goal to reduce operating overhead and shrink the infrastructure of the Corporation. The cost reduction plans resulted in the reduction of workforce by 12 staff positions, which in turn resulted in a one-time pre-tax charge of $145,000 in the second quarter of 2008 for severance and termination benefits. In March 2007, the Corporation reduced its overall staffing level by approximately 10 percent through attrition, layoffs and voluntary resignations, and took a one-time, pre-tax charge of approximately $140,000 in the first quarter of 2007 and $1.6 million in the third quarter of 2007 related to termination benefits.

Occupancy and bank premises and equipment expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased $371,000,2009 decreased $916,000, or 8.7319.4 percent, over 2006.from 2008. The increasedecrease in occupancy and bank premises and equipment expense in 2007 is2009 was due primarily attributable to higherlower operating costs (utilities, rent, real estate taxes, general repair and maintenance) of the Corporation’s expanded facilities, due in part to branch closures and consolidations coupled with higher equipment maintenance and repair and depreciation expenses. Rental payments associated witha $200,000 charge taken during the fourth quarter of 2008 relating to the termination of the Corporation’s Florham Park location will

37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

cease upon sale of the location in 2008. The Florham Park office has been reclassified as held for sale real estate and will not open aslease obligation to build a branch location. The $2.4 million carrying amount for this asset is included in other assets as of December 31, 2007.Cranford, New Jersey. The increase in such expenses of $94,000,$95,000, or 2.262.1 percent, in 20062008 over 20052007 was alsoprimarily attributable to the $200,000 lease termination charge.

In May 2009, the FDIC adopted a final special assessment rule that assessed the banking industry 5 basis points on total assets less Tier I capital. The Corporation was required to accrue the charge during the second quarter of 2009, which amounted to approximately $630,000, even though the FDIC collected the fee at the end of the third quarter when the regular quarterly assessments for the second were collected. Additionally, in December 2008, the FDIC adopted a final rule increasing the risk-based assessment rates beginning in the first quarter of 2009. As a result of these changes coupled with the one-time assessment credits recognized in 2008, FDIC insurance expense increased $1.8 million for 2009 compared to 2008.

Professional and consulting expense for 2009 increased $108,000 due to higher legal costs in 2009, principally related to the rights offering capital raise and the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Expenses decreased in 2008 from 2007 primarily due to $960,000 of expanded bank facilities, includingprofessional and consulting expenses in 2007 associated with the additiontermination of Red Oak Bank.the Beacon Trust acquisition coupled with the 2007 annual meeting and proxy contest.

Stationery and printing expenses for the year2009 decreased $227,000,$58,000, or 32.814.6 percent, compared to 2006,2008, due primarily to a decline in expense relatedbetter cost containment measures relating to marketingstationery and advertising printing materials. These costs increased $64,000The decrease in such expenses of $68,000 or 10.214.6 percent in 20062008 from 2005, reflecting primarily2007 reflected improved cost containment in the merger with Red Oak Bank and increased business activity.purchasing of supplies.

Marketing and advertising expenses for the year ended December 31, 20072009 decreased $128,000,$271,000, or 17.5142.5 percent, overfrom the comparable twelve-month period in 2006.2008. The decrease in 2007 as2009 compared with 2006 2008


TABLE OF CONTENTS

was primarily due to decreasedreduced spending in media and advertising. These expenses increased $87,000$34,000 or 13.515.6 percent in 2006 when2008 compared with 2005 levels, reflecting2007.

Computer expense increased $130,000 during 2009 compared to 2008 and increased $220,000 in 2008 compared to 2007, due primarily to fees paid to the acquisition of Red Oak BankCorporation’s outsourced information technology service provider. This previously announced strategic outsourcing agreement has significantly improved operating efficiencies and reduced overhead, primarily in 2005.salaries and benefits.

The decrease of $127,000 in computer expense during 2007 was due to a decrease in fees for ADP payroll and other technology related services. The increase of $147,000 in computer expense during 2006 was related to increases in expanded customer service platforms and relatedOREO expense for software and service fees2009 increased by $1.4 million over 2008 due primarily to vendor providersthe recognition of a $926,000 writedown coupled with expanded business activity.the continued build out costs relating to the residential real estate condominium project in Union County, New Jersey. The Corporation sold the project during the third quarter of 2009.

Other non-interest expenses increasedexpense decreased in 2009 by approximately $245,000$64,000 or 5.471.9 percent compared to 2006. Higher operating expenses during the twelve-month period resulted2008. Other expense decreased in 2008 by $1.1 million, or 24.1 percent, compared to 2007. This decrease in 2008 was primarily from an increase in other general and administrative expenses as well as OREO expense,due to the charge-off of the Beacon Trust transaction and certain specific customer-related expenses. Other expense items which increased during the period included increases in director fees, telephone expense and insurance expense for the twelve-month period.2007. Amortization of core deposit intangibles accounted for $108,000$82,000 and $120,000$95,000 of other expense for the years 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

The Corporation’sCorporation recorded income tax benefit decreased from 2006 to 2007, primarily as a resultexpense of an increase of $354,000$1.5 million in pre-tax income as2009 compared to 2006, the recognition$1.6 million in March 2006,2008 and a tax benefit of a pre-tax net loss on securities sales of $3.7$2.9 million coupled within 2007. The recorded tax benefits in 2007 resulted largely from a change in the Corporation’s business entity structure, which resulted inled to the recognition of a $1.3 million tax benefit in 2007 and a $1.4 million tax benefit in the fourth quarter of 2006. These tax benefits were attributable to a plan of liquidation adopted by the Corporation for its REIT subsidiary, which was completed on November 30, 2007. TheAs a result of the further liquidation of certain other subsidiaries relating to the business entity restructuring, the Corporation recorded anbegan to provide for income tax benefit of $2.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 as compared with an income tax benefit of $3.3 million for the comparable twelve-month periodexpense in 2006.2008. The effective tax rates for the Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 2006 and 2005 were (317.77)24.5 percent, (585.06)21.1 percent and 13.41(317.8) percent, respectively. The effective tax rate continues to be less than the combined statutory Federal tax rate of 34 percent and the New Jersey State tax rate of 9 percent. The Corporation adjusts its expected annual tax rate on a quarterly basis based on the current projections of non-deductible expenses, tax-exempt interest income, increase in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance and pre-tax net earnings.

Tax-exempt interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis decreased by $1.2$2.4 million, or 17.761.3 percent, from 20062008 to 2007,2009, and decreased by $1.4$1.7 million, or 17.029.9 percent, from 20052007 to 2006.2008. The Corporation recorded income related to the cash surrender value of bank ownedbank-owned life insurance as a component of other income in the amount of $1,156,000, $1,203,000 and $893,000 $780,000for 2009, 2008 and $740,000 for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Note 42 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting policies adopted by the Corporation during 2007 and the expected impact of accounting policies recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable sections of the financial review and notes to the consolidated financial statements.

On June 29, 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 105-10-65 (previously SFAS No. 168, “Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“Codification”)). This Codification is the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. The Corporation adopted the Codification for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as required, and there was not a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements taken as a whole. In order to ease the transition to the Codification, the Corporation has provided the Codification cross-reference along side the references to the standards issued and adopted prior to the adoption of the Codification.

38


TABLE OF CONTENTS

In April 2009, the FASB issued three amendments to the fair value measurement, disclosure and other-than-temporary impairment standards:

FASB ASC 820-10-65 (previously SFAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly”).
FASB ASC 320-10-65 (previously SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”).
FASB ASC 825-10-65 (previously SFAS 107 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”).

FASB ASC 820-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 155

157, “Fair Value Measurements”) defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FASB ASC 820-10-05 provides additional guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10-05.

FASB ASC 820-10-65 clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In February 2006,those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. It also provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

FASB ASC 320-10-65 amends other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities and expands disclosure requirements for other-than-temporarily impaired debt and equity securities. FASB ASC 320-10-65 requires companies to record other-than-temporary impairment charges, through earnings, if they have the intent to sell, or will more likely than not be required to sell, an impaired debt security before a recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, FASB ASC 320-10-65 requires companies to record other-than-temporary impairment charges through earnings for the amount of credit losses, regardless of the intent or requirement to sell. Credit loss is measured as the difference between the present value of an impaired debt security’s cash flows and its amortized cost basis. Non-credit related write-downs to fair value must be recorded as decreases to accumulated other comprehensive income as long as a company has no intent or requirement to sell an impaired security before a recovery of amortized cost basis. Finally, FASB ASC 320-10-65 requires companies to record all previously recorded non-credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges for debt securities as cumulative effect adjustments to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.

FASB ASC 825-10-65 (previously SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1) requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FASB ASC 825-10-65 also requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

All three FASB ASC’s discussed herein include substantial additional disclosure requirements. The effective date for these new ASC’s is the same: interim and annual reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted these ASC’s at June 30, 2009 and there was not a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On May 28, 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 855-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”). Under FASB ASC 855-10-05, companies are required to evaluate events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of non-public entities. FASB ASC 855-10-05 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements


TABLE OF CONTENTS

the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. FASB ASC 855-10-05 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. FASB ASC 855-10-05 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 855-10-05 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard had no material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

On June 12, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,166, “Accounting for Certain HybridTransfers of Financial Instruments, an amendment ofAssets” (“FAS 166”), and SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB StatementsInterpretation No. 133 and 140”46(R)” (“SFAS 155”FAS 167”), which amends Statement No. 133change the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose entities.

FAS 166 is a revision to simplify the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments (hybrid financial instruments) by permitting fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise required bifurcation, provided that the entire hybrid financial instrument is accounted for on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also establishes the requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, which replaces the interim guidance in Derivative Instrument Group Issue D1, Recognition and Measurement of Derivatives: Application of Statement No. 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. SFAS 155 amendsFASB ASC 860-10-05 (previously SFAS 140, Accounting“Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and ExtinguishmentExtinguishments of Liabilities —Liabilities”) and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. FAS 166 also eliminates the concept of a replacement“qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.

FAS 167 changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of FASB Statement No. 125 (“SFAS 140”),whether a company is required to allowconsolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a qualifying special-purposecompany’s ability to direct the activities of the entity to hold a derivative financial instrument that pertains to beneficial interests other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 ismost significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.

Both FAS 166 and FAS 167 will be effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued afteras of the beginning of theeach reporting entity’s first fiscal yearannual reporting period that begins after SeptemberNovember 15, 2006, with earlier adoption allowed.2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of FAS 166 shall be applied to transfers that occur on or after the effective date. The Corporation adopted SFAS 155 effectiveboth FAS 166 and FAS 167 on January 1, 2007 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

SFAS No. 156

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets: an amendment of SFAS No. 140” (“SFAS 156”). This statement requires all separately recognized servicing rights to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. For each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities, this statement permits the Corporation to choose either to report servicing assets and liabilities at fair value or at amortized cost. Under the fair value approach, servicing assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value recorded in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. Under the amortized cost method, servicing assets and liabilities are amortized in proportion to and over the period of net servicing income or net servicing loss and are assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. Adoption of this statement is required for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted SFAS 156 effective January 1, 2007 and is applying the requirements for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and liabilities prospectively to all transactions.2010, as required. The Corporation is using the amortized cost method for subsequent measurement of servicing rights. Adoption of SFAS 156 did not have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FIN 48

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that companies recognize in their financial statementscurrently assessing the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Corporation adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.

Thethis adoption of FIN 48 did not impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. At January 1, 2007, the Corporation had unrecognized tax benefits of $1.1 million, which primarily related to uncertainty regarding the sustainability of certain deductions to be taken in 2007 and future U.S. Federal income tax returns related to the liquidation of the Corporation’s New Jersey REIT subsidiaries. To the extent these unrecognized tax benefits are ultimately recognized, they will impact the effective tax rate in a future period. At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had recorded as a component of tax expense approximately $61,131 in interest expense related to the unrecognized tax benefit.

FSP FIN 48-1

In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48” (“FSP FIN 48-1”). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively to January 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard did notmay have a material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 157

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to US GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, the FASB issued proposed FSP 157-b, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” that would permit a one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of Statement No. 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities (non-financial items) that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Therefore, if the change in fair value of a non-financial item is not required to be recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on an annual basis or more frequently, the effective date of application of Statement 157 to that item is deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. This deferral does not apply, however, to an entity that applies Statement 157 in interim or annual financial statements before proposed FSP 157-b is finalized. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of FSP 157-b will have on the Company’s operating income or net earnings.

EITF 06-4

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements”, was ratified. This EITF Issue addresses accounting for separate agreements which split life insurance policy benefits between an employer and employee. The Issue requires the employer to recognize a liability for future benefits payable to the employee under these agreements. The effects of applying this Issue must be recognized through either a change in accounting principle through an adjustment to equity or through the retrospective application to all prior periods. For calendar year companies, the Issue is effective beginning January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of the Issue to have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

EITF 06-5

In September 2006, EITF Issue No. 06-5, “Accounting for PurchasesNovember 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of Life Insurance — Determiningfinancial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the Amount That Could Be RealizedInternational Accounting Standards Board. Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to prepare financial statements in Accordanceaccordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance,” was issued.IFRS as early as 2014. The Task Force reachedSEC will make a consensus that a policyholder should consider any additional amounts includeddetermination in 2011 regarding the contractual terms of the policy in determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract.

The Task Force also reached a consensus that a policyholder should determine the amount that could be realized under the life insurance contract assuming the surrender of an individual-life by individual-life policy (or certificate by certificate in a group policy). Furthermore, the Task Force reached a consensus that the cash surrender value should not be discounted when contractual limitations on the ability to surrender a policy exist if the policy continues to operate under its normal terms (continues to earn interest) during the restriction period. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation has adopted the Issue as of January 1, 2007 and themandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently assessing the Issue has had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements, results of operations or cash flows of the Corporation.

FSP FAS 158-1

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 158-1, “Conforming Amendments to the Illustrations in FASB Statements No. 87, No. 88, and No 106 and to the Related Staff Implementation Guides.” This FSP makes conforming amendments to other FASB statements and staff implementation guides and provides technical corrections to SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Postretirement Plans.” The conforming amendments inthat this FSP shall be applied upon adoption of SFAS No. 158. The Corporation believes its adoption of FSP FAS 158-1 will notpotential change would have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, or disclosures.

SFAS No. 159

In February 2007,and it will continue to monitor the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS159”). SFAS 159 provides all entities with the option of reporting selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing opportunities to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Mostdevelopment of the provisions in this statement apply only to entities which elect SFAS 159. However the amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to entities with available for sale and trading securities, and requires an entity to present separately fair value and non-fair value securities. SFAS159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect thepotential implementation of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

EITF 06-10

In March 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-10 “Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements” (“EITF 06-10”). EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment agreement. EITF 06-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation currently does not expect the impact of EITF 06-10 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

EITF 06-11

In June 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 states that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional paid in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid in capital should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 should be applied prospectively to income tax benefits of dividends on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation expects that EITF 06-11 will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 141(R)

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R)’s objective is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 31, 2008. This new pronouncement will impact the Corporation’s accounting for business combinations completed beginning January 1, 2009.

SFAS No. 160

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS 160’s objective is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 shall be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

SAB 109

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109 (“SAB 109”), “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings” expresses the views of the staff regarding written loan commitments that are accounted for

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

at fair value through earnings under generally accepted accounting principles. To make the staff’s views consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance, the SAB revises and rescinds portions of SAB No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.” Specifically, the SAB revises the SEC staff’s views on incorporating expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment. The SAB retains the staff’s views on incorporating expected net future cash flows related to internally-developed intangible assets in the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment. The staff expects registrants to apply the views in Question 1 of SAB 109 on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect SAB 109 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

SAB 110

SAB No. 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment,” of the Staff Accounting Bulletin series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 is effective January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect SAB 110 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.IFRS.

Asset and Liability Management

Asset and liability management encompasses an analysis of market risk, the control of interest rate risk (interest sensitivity management) and the ongoing maintenance and planning of liquidity and capital. The composition of the Corporation’s statement of condition is planned and monitored by the Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). In general, management’s objective is to optimize net interest income and minimize market risk and interest rate risk by monitoring these components of the statement of condition.

Short-term interest rate exposure analysis is supplemented with an interest sensitivity gap model. The Corporation utilizes interest sensitivity analysis to measure the responsiveness of net interest income to changes in interest rate levels. Interest rate risk arises when an earning-assetearning asset matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different than that of a supporting interest-bearing liability, or when an interest-bearing liability matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different than that of an earning-assetearning asset that it supports. While the Corporation matches only a small portion of specific assets and liabilities, total earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are grouped to determine the overall interest rate risk within


TABLE OF CONTENTS

a number of specific time frames. The difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities is referred to as the interest sensitivity gap. At any given point in time, the Corporation may be in an asset-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive assets exceed its interest-sensitive liabilities, or in a liability-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive liabilities exceed its interest-sensitive assets, depending in part on management’s judgment as to projected interest rate trends.

The Corporation’s rate sensitivity position in each time frame may be expressed as assets less liabilities, as liabilities less assets, or as the ratio between rate sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate sensitive liabilities (“RSL”). For example, a short funded position (liabilities repricing before assets) would be expressed as a net negative position, when period gaps are computed by subtracting repricing liabilities from repricing assets. When using the ratio method, a RSA/RSL ratio of 1 indicates a balanced position, a ratio greater than 1 indicates an asset sensitive position and a ratio less than 1 indicates a liability sensitive position.

A negative gap and/or a rate sensitivity ratio less than 1, tends to expand net interest margins in a falling rate environment and to reduce net interest margins in a rising rate environment. Conversely, when a positive gap occurs, generally margins expand in a rising rate environment and contract in a falling rate environment. From time to time, the Corporation may elect to deliberately mismatch liabilities and assets in a strategic gap position.

At December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation reflectsreflected a positive interest sensitivity gap (or an interest sensitivity ratio of 1.10:1:09:1.00) at the cumulative one-year position. During all of 2007 and 2006, the

42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Corporation had a negative interest sensitivity gap. The rising rates during 2006 and most of 2007 and a flattening of the yield curve during 2006 affected net interest margins. Based on management’s perception that interest rates will continue to be volatile, projected increased levels of prepayments on the earning-assetearning asset portfolio and the current level of interest rates, emphasis has been, and is expected to continue to be, placed on interest-sensitivity matching with the objective of stabilizingcontinuing to stabilize the net interest spread and margin during 2008.2010. However, no assurance can be given that this objective will be met.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table depicts the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity position at December 31, 2007:2009:

                  
                  
 Expected Maturity/Principal Repayment December 31, Expected Maturity/Principal Repayment December 31,
 Average
Interest
Rate		 Year
End
2008		 Year
End
2009		 Year
End
2010		 Year
End
2011		 Year
End
2012		 2013
and
Thereafter		 Total
Balance		 Estimated
Fair
Value		 Average
Interest
Rate		 Year
End
2010		 Year
End
2011		 Year
End
2012		 Year
End
2013		 Year
End
2014		 2015
and
Thereafter		 Total
Balance		 Estimated
Fair
Value
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-Earning Assets:
                                                                                          
Loans  6.12%  $266,578  $115,497  $78,748  $42,440  $21,790  $21,453  $546,506  $550,978 
Fed funds sold  4.63%   49,490   0   0   0   0   0   49,490   49,490 
Loans, net  5.33%  $340,977  $90,254  $74,772  $90,302  $54,959  $55,914  $707,178  $713,474 
Investments  4.84%   71,219   32,170   29,436   27,703   23,833   129,833   314,194   314,194   4.10%   54,407   40,772   37,460   20,014   14,566   130,905   298,124   298,124 
Total interest-earning assets    $387,287  $147,667  $108,184  $70,143  $45,623  $151,286  $910,190  $914,662     $395,384  $131,026  $112,232  $110,316  $69,525  $186,819  $1,005,302  $1,011,598 
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
                                                                                          
Time certificates of deposit of $100 or greater  4.80%  $60,821  $2,231  $462  $254  $229  $0  $63,997  $64,123   1.38%  $141,827  $2,119  $753  $103  $—  $—  $144,802  $145,219 
Time certificates of deposit of less than $100  4.60%   76,409   6,343   1,682   548   321   0   85,303   85,470   1.75%   69,688   6,836   3,391   258   —   —   80,173   80,543 
Other interest-bearing deposits  2.82%   53,399   170,367   24.379   21,611   111,296   57,296   438,348   438,348   0.84%   60,770   60,770   68,842   59,256   100,302   108,272   458,212   458,212 
Subordinated debentures  7.83%   5,155   0   0   0   0   0   5,155   5,155   3.23%   5,155   —   —   —   —   —   5,155   5,155 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Fed Funds Purchased  4.28%   79,541   0   0   12,000   0   0   91,541   93,271   3.35%   46,109   12,000   —   —   —   41,000   99,109   101,555 
Term borrowings  4.42%   76,276   157   40,135   10,000   0   0   126,568   128,960   4.09%   40,144   10,000   —   5,000   —   115,000   170,144   177,664 
Total interest-bearing liabilities    $351,601  $179,098  $66,658  $44,413  $111,846  $57,296  $810,912  $815,327     $363,693  $91,725  $72,986  $64,617  $100,302  $264,272  $957,595  $968,348 
Cumulative interest-earning assets     387,287   534,954   643,138   713,281   758,904   910,190   910,190          $395,384  $526,410  $638,642  $748,958  $818,483  $1,005,302  $1,005,302      
Cumulative interest-bearing liabilities     351,601   530,699   597,357   641,770   753,616   810,912   810,912           363,693   455,418   528,404   593,021   693,323   957,595   957,595      
Rate sensitivity gap     35,686   (31,431)   41,526   25,730   (66,223)   93,990   99,278           31,691   39,301   39,246   45,699   (30,777)   (77,453)   47,707      
Cumulative rate sensitivity gap    $35,686  $4,255  $45,781  $71,511  $5,288  $99,278  $99,278           31,691   70,992   110,238   155,937   125,160   47,707   47,707      
Cumulative gap ratio     1.10%   1.01%   1.08%   1.11%   1.01%   1.12%   1.12%           1.09%   1.16%   1.21%   1.26%   1.18%   1.05%   1.05%      

Estimates of Fair Value

The estimation of fair value is significant to a number of the Corporation’s assets, including loans held for sale, and available for saleavailable-for-sale investment securities. These are all recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors. Circumstances that could cause estimates of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities to change include a change in prepayment speeds, expected cash flows, credit quality, discount rates, or market interest rates. Fair values for most available for sale investment securities are based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic condition risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. See Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the operations; unlike most industrial companies, nearly all of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities are monetary. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Liquidity

The liquidity position of the Corporation is dependent on successful management of its assets and liabilities so as to meet the needs of both deposit and credit customers. Liquidity needs arise principally to accommodate possible deposit outflows and to meet customers’ requests for loans. Scheduled principal loan repayments, maturing investments, short-term liquid assets and deposit in-flows, can satisfy such needs. The objective of liquidity management is to enable the Corporation to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner.

Management monitors current and projected cash flows, and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. By using a variety of potential funding sources and staggering maturities, the risk of potential funding pressure is reduced. Management also maintains a detailed liquidity contingency plan designed to respond adequately to situations which could lead to liquidity concerns.

Management believes that the Corporation has the funding capacity to meet the liquidity needs arising from potential events. In addition to pledgeable securities, the Corporation also maintains borrowing capacity through the Federal Discount Window and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York secured with loans and marketable securities.

Liquidity is measured and monitored for the Corporation’s bank subsidiary, Union Center National Bank (the “Bank”). The Corporation reviews its net short-term mismatch. This measures the ability of the Corporation to meet obligations should access to Bank dividends be constrained. At December 31, 2007,2009, the Parent Corporation had $2.1$3.2 million in cash and short-term investments compared to $5.3$2.2 million at December 31, 2006. The change in cash at the Parent Corporation level was due in part to the use of funds for the Corporation’s common stock buyback program.2008. Expenses at the Parent Corporation are moderate and management believes that the Parent Corporation has adequate liquidity to fund its obligations.

Certain provisions of long-term debt agreements, primarily subordinated debt, prevent the Corporation from creating liens on, disposing of or issuing voting stock of subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation was in compliance with all covenants and provisions of these agreements.

Management monitors current and projected cash flows, and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. By using a variety of potential funding sources and staggering maturities, the risk of potential funding pressure is somewhat reduced. Management also maintains a detailed liquidity contingency plan designed to adequately respond to situations which could lead to liquidity concerns.

Anticipated cash-flowsBased on anticipated cash flows at December 31, 2007,2009 projected to December 31, 2008, indicates2010, the Corporation believes that the Bank’s liquidity should remain strong, with an approximate projection of $341.3$367.1 million in anticipated cash flows over the next twelve months. This projection represents a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from this projection depending upon a number of factors, including the liquidity needs of the Bank’s customers, the availability of sources of liquidity and general economic conditions.

On September 30, 2009, the FDIC proposed a rule that required insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly assessments through December 31, 2012 to strengthen the cash position of the Deposit Insurance Fund. The cash prepayment was made on December 30, 2009 and amounted to approximately $5.7 million, which included the 2009 fourth quarter assessment. The prepayment did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s future cash position or operations.

Deposits

Total deposits decreasedincreased to $699.1$813.7 million on December 31, 20072009 from $726.8$659.5 million at December 31, 2006, a decrease2008, an increase of $27.7$154.2 million, or 3.8123.4 percent.

Total non-interest-bearing deposits decreasedincreased from $136.4$113.3 million at December 31, 2008 to $111.4$130.5 million a decreaseat December 31, 2009, an increase of $25.0$17.2 million or 18.3415.2 percent. Time, savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts increased from $506.7$546.2 million on December 31, 20062008 to $523.7$683.2 million at December 31, 2007,2009, an increase of $17.0$137.0 million or 3.3525.1 percent. During 2007,The increase in deposits was reflective of customers’ desire for safety and liquidity and flight to quality in light of the Corporation experienced a shift in its deposit mix to more costly interest-bearing deposits, driven by the changes that occurred in interest rates. In 2005, the Corporationfinancial crisis.

44


TABLE OF CONTENTS

acquired $62.7 million in interest-bearing transaction accounts from the Red Oak Bank acquisition. In 2007, time depositsCertificates of deposit $100,000 and over decreased $19.6 millionincreased to $64.0 million from17.8 percent of total deposits at December 31, 2006.2009 from 15.2 percent one year earlier. With the current turmoil in the financial markets, some of the Corporation’s depositors have become sensitive to obtaining full FDIC insurance for their time deposits. To accommodate its customers, the Corporation began offering Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) in 2008. As a result of this offering and the temporary increase in insurance coverage by the FDIC to $250,000, the Corporation reported an increase of $44.3 million in certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 at December 31, 2009 compared to year-end 2008.

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had a total of $111.3 million with a weighted average rate of 1.24 percent in CDARS Reciprocal deposits compared to $87.9 million with a weighted average rate of 2.52 percent at December 31, 2008. Based on the Bank’s participation in Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC., customers who are FDIC insurance sensitive are able to place large dollar deposits with the Corporation and the Corporation uses CDARS to place those funds into certificates of deposit issued by other banks in the Network. This occurs in increments of less than the FDIC insurance limits so that both the principal and interest are eligible for complete FDIC protection. The FDIC currently considers these funds as brokered deposits. All brokered deposits are classified in time deposits. It became apparent during the latter half of 2008 that customers’ preference in seeking safety and more liquidity became paramount in light of the financial crisis, as customers sought full FDIC insured bank products as a safe haven.

The Corporation derives a significant proportion of its liquidity from its core deposit base. For the twelve-month periodyear ended December 31, 2007,2009, core deposits, comprised of total demand deposits, savings and money market accounts, increaseddecreased by $22.2$166.4 million or 4.2138.7 percent from December 31, 20062008 to $549.8$596.7 million. At December 31, 2007,2009, core deposits were 78.673.3 percent of total deposits compared to 72.666.6 percent at year-end 2006.2008. Alternatively, the Corporation uses a more stringent calculation for the management of its liquidity positions internally which consists of total demand and savings accounts (excluding money market accounts greater than $100,000) and excludes time deposits as part of core deposits as a percentage of total deposits. This number represented 51.1846.6 percent of total deposits at December 31, 20072009 as compared with 49.5853.0 percent at December 31, 2006.

More volatile rate sensitive deposits, concentrated2008. The Corporation expects its deposit gathering efforts to remain strong, supported in certificates ofpart by the recent actions by the FDIC in temporarily raising the deposit $100,000 and greater, decreased to 9.15 percent of total deposits from 11.51 percent at December 31, 2006. This change was due primarily to increased rates and enhanced market competition for certificates of deposit $100,000 and greater in 2007 compared to 2006. As such, theinsurance limits. The Corporation elected to reduce its reliance on this segment of depositsis a participant in the current rate environment.FDIC’s Transaction Account Guarantee Program. Under this program, all non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts are fully guaranteed by the FDIC, regardless of dollar amount, through June 30, 2010.

Core Deposit Mix

The following table depicts the Corporation’s core deposit mix at December 31, 20072009 and 2006.2008.

          
 December 31, Net Change Volume 2007 vs. 2006 December 31, Net Change
Volume
2009 vs. 2008
 2007 2006 2009 2008
 Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Percentage
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Demand Deposits $111,262   31.1  $136,284   37.8  $(25,022)  $130,518   34.4  $113,319   32.4  $17,199 
Interest-Bearing Demand  155,406   43.4   107,359   29.8   48,047   156,738   41.3   139,349   39.9   17,389 
Regular Savings  48,127   13.5   58,389   16.2   (10,262)   58,240   15.4   56,431   16.2   1,809 
Money Market Deposits under $100  42,990   12.0   58,290   16.2   (15,300)   33,795   8.9   40,419   11.5   (6,624) 
Total core deposits $357,785   100.0  $360,322   100.0  $(2,537)  $379,291   100.0  $349,518   100.0  $29,773 
Total deposits $699,070  $726,771  $(27,701)        $813,705     $659,537     $154,168 
Core deposits to total deposits  51.18%      49.58%         46.61%      52.99%       

Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings can be used to satisfy daily funding needs. Balances in those accounts fluctuate on a day-to-day basis. The Corporation’s principal short-term funding sources are Federal fundsFunds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Average short-termShort-term borrowings, including federal fundsFederal Funds purchased during 2007and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, amounted to approximately $48.7$46.1 million a decreaseat year-end 2009, an increase of $8.9 million$966,000 or 15.52.1 percent from 2006.year-end 2008.

45


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table is a summary of short-term securities sold under repurchase agreements for each of the last three years.

   
 December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Short-term securities sold under repurchase agreements:
               
Average interest rate:
               
At year end  0.97%   1.98%   3.85% 
For the year  1.38%   2.39%   3.60% 
Average amount outstanding during the year $35,392  $43,973  $33,683 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end $58,515  $52,992  $48,541 
Amount outstanding at year end $46,109  $30,143  $48,541 

Long-Term Borrowings

Long-term borrowings consist of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase that have contractual maturities over one year. Average long-termLong-term borrowings during 2007 amounted to approximately $157.0$223.1 million at December 31, 2009, a decrease of $11.4 million or 6.8 percent$153,000 from 2006.year-end 2008.

The following table is a summary of securities sold under repurchase agreements for each of the last three years.

   
 December 31,
   2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities sold under repurchase agreements:
               
Average interest rate:
               
At year end  4.04%   4.20%   2.44% 
For the year  4.23%   3.78%   0.82% 
Average amount outstanding during the year: $87,997  $96,381  $119,079 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end: $107,278  $103,447  $160,842 
Amount outstanding at year end: $91,541  $97,443  $75,693 

Cash Flows

The consolidated statements of cash flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. During 2009, cash and cash equivalents (which increased overall by $74.1 million) were provided on a net basis by operating activities and financing activities and used on a net basis by investing activities. Cash flows from financing activities, primarily due to a net increase in deposits, were partially offset by an increase in financing activities, primarily resulting from an increase in securities and loans.

During 2008, cash and cash equivalents (which decreased overall by $55.0 million) were used on a net basis by operating activities and investing activities and provided on a net basis by financing activities. Cash flows from investing activities, primarily due to a net decrease in securities, were partially offset by an increase in financing activities, primarily resulting from an increase in borrowings.

During 2007, cash and cash equivalents (which increased overall by $25.7 million) were provided on a net basis by operating activities and investing activities and used on a net basis by financing activities. Cash flows from investing activities, primarily due to a net decrease in securities, were partially offset by a decrease in financing activities, primarily resulting from a reduction in deposits, as well as funding dividends paid and the purchase of treasury stock.

During 2006, cash and cash equivalents (which increased overall by $25.0 million) were provided on a net basis by operating and investing activities and used on a net basis by financing activities. Cash flows from operating activities, primarily net income and cash flow resulting from an increase in other liabilities, and investing activities, primarily a net decrease in securities, offset in part by a net increase in loans, were used in financing activities, reflecting a reduction in borrowings, redemption of subordinated debentures and payment of dividends.

During 2005, cash and cash equivalents (which increased overall by $7.3 million) were provided on a net basis by operating and financing activities and used on a net basis by investing activities. Cash flows from operating activities, primarily net income, and financing activities, primarily a net increase in borrowings and proceeds from the issuance of Parent Corporation’s common stock, were used in investing activities, primarily the increased volume of loans and property and equipment.

46


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 20072009 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

          
 Total Less Than
1 Year		 1 – 3 Years 4 – 5 Years After 5
Years		 Total Less Than
1 Year		 1 – 3 Years 4 – 5 Years After
5 Years
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Contractual Obligations
                                                  
Operating lease obligations $8,176  $769  $1,264  $1,340  $4,803  $7,714  $592  $1,232  $1,033  $4,857 
Total contracted cost obligations $8,176  $769  $1,264  $1,340  $4,803  $7,714  $592  $1,232  $1,033  $4,857 
Other Long-term Liabilities/Long-term Debt
                                                  
Time Deposits  149,300   137,230   10,718   1,352   —  $224,974  $213,400  $11,213  $361  $— 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements  218,109   49,665   40,444   37,000   91,000   269,253   86,253   22,000   5,000   156,000 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   —   5,155   —   —   5,155   5,155   —   —   — 
Total Other Long-term Liabilities/Long-term Debt $372,564  $186,895  $56,317  $38,352  $91,000  $499,382  $304,808  $33,213  $5,361  $156,000 
Other Commercial Commitments – Off Balance Sheet
                                                  
Commitments under commercial loans and lines of credit  27,488   27,488   —   —   —  $70,076  $70,076  $—  $—  $— 
Home equity and other revolving lines of credit  71,810   71,810   —   —   —   54,572   54,572   —   —   — 
Outstanding commercial mortgage loan commitments  70,110   45,417   24,693   —   —   33,659   20,596   13,063   —   — 
Standby letters of credit  2,407   2,407   —   —   —   1,676   1,676   —   —   — 
Performance letters of credit  12,977   12,690   287   —   —   11,466   11,466   —   —   — 
Outstanding residential mortgage loan commitments  605   605   —   —   —   4,153   4,153   —   —   — 
Overdraft protection lines  5,891   5,891   —   —   —   5,058   5,058   —   —   — 
Other consumer  11   11   —   —   — 
Total off balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations $191,288  $166,308  $24,980  $—  $—  $180,671  $167,608  $13,063  $—  $— 
Total contractual obligations and other commitments $572,028  $353,972  $82,561  $39,692  $95,803  $687,767  $473,008  $47,508  $6,394  $160,857 

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity averaged $94.3amounted to $102.6 million during 2007,at December 31, 2009, an increase of $20.9 million or 25.5 percent, compared to year-end 2008. At December 31, 2008, stockholders’ equity totaled $81.7 million, a decrease of $2.2 million or 2.24 percent, as compared to 2006. At December 31, 2006, stockholders’ equity totaled $96.5 million, an increase of $10.7$3.6 million from December 31, 2005.2007.

On January 12, 2009, the Corporation issued $10 million in nonvoting senior preferred stock to the U.S. Department of Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program. As part of the transaction, the Corporation also issued warrants to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 173,410 shares of common stock of the Corporation at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. As previously announced, the Corporation’s voluntary participation in the Capital Purchase Program amounted to approximately 50 percent of what the Corporation had qualified for under the U.S. Treasury program. The Corporation’s dividend reinvestmentfunding was used to support the balance sheet. As a result of the successful completion of the Rights Offering in October 2009, the number of shares underlying the warrant held by the U.S. Treasury was reduced to 86,705 shares or 50 percent of the original 173,410 shares.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

In July 2009, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a rights offering of up to approximately $11 million of common stock to its existing stockholders. In October, the Corporation successfully raised total gross proceeds of approximately $11 million in its rights offering and optional stock purchase plan coupleda private placement with option activity contributed $829,000 in new capital during 2007. its standby purchaser.

Book value per share at year-end 20072009 was $6.48$6.38 compared to $7.02$6.29 at year-end 2006.2008. Tangible book value at year-end 20072009 was $5.17$5.21 compared to $5.77$4.97 at year end 2006;2008; see Item 6 for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to book value. The decline in 2007 as compared to 2006 reflects

During the change in goodwill and other intangible assets,year of 2009, the reduction in capital as a resultCorporation made no purchases of the repurchase of shares and changes in other comprehensive income.

As ofcommon stock. At December 31, 2007, the Corporation has purchased 1,193,780 common2009, there were 652,868 shares at an average cost per share of $11.68available for repurchase under the Corporation’s stock buyback program announced on January 24, 2002, as amended on March 27, 2006 and October 1, 2007, for the repurchase of up to 1,390,019 shares of the Corporation’s outstanding common stock. The repurchased shares were recorded as Treasury Stock, which resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ equity.

47

TABLE OF CONTENTSprogram.

Capital

The maintenance of a solid capital foundation continues to be a primary goal for the Corporation. Accordingly, capital plans and dividend policies are monitored on an ongoing basis. The most important objective of the capital planning process is to balance effectively the retention of capital to support future growth and the goal of providing stockholders with an attractive long-term return on their investment.

Risk-Based Capital/Leverage

The Tier I leverage capital at December 31, 20072009 (defined as tangible stockholders’ equity for common stock and Trust Preferred Capital Securities) amounted to $79.1$99.3 million or 7.777.80 percent of average total assets. At December 31, 2007,2008, the Corporation’s Tier I risk-basedleverage capital amounted to $79.1$78.2 million or 8.137.71 percent of total assets. Tier I capital excludes the effect of SFAS No. 115,FASB ASC 320-10-05, which amounted to $5.1$8.4 million of net unrealized losses, after tax, on securities available-for-sale (reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income which is included in stockholders’ equity), and is reduced by goodwill and intangible assets of $17.2$17.0 million as of December 31, 2007.2009. For information on goodwill and intangible assets, see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

United States bank regulators have issued guidelines establishing minimum capital standards related to the level of assets and off balance-sheet exposures adjusted for credit risk. Specifically, these guidelines categorize assets and off balance-sheet items into four risk-weightings and require banking institutions to maintain a minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets. At December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation’s Tier I and total risk-based capital ratios were 11.6511.51 percent and 12.4112.46 percent, respectively. These ratios are well above the minimum guidelines of capital to risk-adjusted assets in effect as of December 31, 2007. For information on risk-based capital and regulatory guidelines for the Parent Corporation and its bank subsidiary, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the bank regulators regarding capital components, risk weightings and other factors. The OCC has established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank effective as of December 31, 2009: Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital of 10 percent, Total Risk-Based Capital of 12 percent and Tier 1 Leverage Capital of 8 percent. As of December 31, 2007,2009, management believes that each of the Bank and the Parent Corporation meet all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.subject, other than the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio, which at 7.62 percent was slightly below the 8 percent established by the OCC for the Bank. Under the MOU between the Bank and the OCC, the Bank has agreed to develop a three year capital program, which will include specific plans for the maintenance of adequate capital and the strengthening of the Bank’s capital structure to meet current and future needs.

Subordinated Debentures

On December 19, 2003, Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Center Bancorp, Inc., issued $5.0 million of, MMCapS capital securities to investors due on January 23, 2034. The capital securities presently qualify as Tier I capital. The trust loaned the proceeds of this offering to the Corporation and received in exchange $5.2 million of the Parent Corporation’s subordinated debentures. The subordinatesubordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or in part, prior to maturity but after January 23, 2009. The floating interest rate on the subordinate debentures is three-month LIBOR plus 2.85 percent and reprices quarterly. The rate at December 31, 20072009 was 7.833.13 percent.


On December 18, 2001, Center Bancorp Statutory Trust I, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Center Bancorp, Inc., issued $10.0 million of floating rate capital trust pass through securities to investors due on December 18, 2031. The trust loaned the proceeds of this offering to the Corporation and received in exchange $10.3 million of the Parent Corporation’s subordinated debentures. The subordinated debentures were redeemed in whole on December 18, 2006. Prior to redemption on December 18, 2006, the floating interest rate on the subordinated debentures was three-month LIBOR plus 3.85 percent and repriced quarterly. The rate at redemption was 8.99 percent.TABLE OF CONTENTS

The additional capital raised with respect to the issuance of the floating rate capital pass throughpass-through securities was used to bolster the Corporation’s capital and for general corporate purposes, including capital contributions to Union Center National Bank. Additional information regarding the capital treatment of these securities is contained by reference toin Note 1410 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Looking Forward

One of the Corporation’s primary objectives is to achieve balanced asset and revenue growth, and at the same time expand market presence and diversify its financial products. However, it is recognized that

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

objectives, no matter how focused, are subject to factors beyond the control of the Corporation, which can impede its ability to achieve these goals. The following factors should be considered when evaluating the Corporation’s ability to achieve its objectives:

The financial market place is rapidly changing. Banks are no longer the only place to obtain loans, nor the only place to keep financial assets. The banking industry has lost market share to other financial service providers. The future is predicated on the Corporation’s ability to adapt its products, provide superior customer service and compete in an ever-changing marketplace.

Net interest income, the primary source of earnings, is impacted favorably or unfavorably by changes in interest rates. Although the impact of interest rate fluctuations is mitigated by ALCO strategies, significant changes in interest rates can have a material adverse impact on profitability.

The ability of customers to repay their obligations is often impacted by changes in the regional and local economy. Although the Corporation sets aside loan loss provisions toward the allowance for loan losses when the Boardmanagement determines such action to be appropriate, significant unfavorable changes in the economy could impact the assumptions used in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance.

Technological changes will have a material impact on how financial service companies compete for and deliver services. It is recognized that these changes will have a direct impact on how the marketplace is approached and ultimately on profitability. The Corporation has taken steps to improve its traditional delivery channels. However, continued success will likely be measured by the ability to anticipate and react to future technological changes.

This “Looking Forward” description constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the Corporation’s forward-looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the factors referred to above, in Item 1A ifof this Annual Report on Form 10K and in other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10K.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Sensitivity

Market Risk

The Corporation’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial increase or decrease in interest rates may adversely affect the Corporation’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not similarly adjust. The Corporation’s primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and capital, while structuring the Corporation’s asset-liability structure to obtain the maximum yield-cost spread on that structure. The Corporation relies primarily on its asset-liability structure to control interest rate risk. The Corporation continually evaluates interest rate risk management opportunities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. The management of the Corporation believes that hedging instruments currently available are not cost-effective, and, therefore, has focused its efforts on increasing the Corporation’s yield-cost spread through wholesale and retail growth opportunities.

The Corporation monitors the impact of changes in interest rates on its net interest income using several tools. One measure of the Corporation’s exposure to differential changes in interest rates between assets and liabilities is the Corporation’s analysis of its interest rate sensitivity. This test measures the impact on net


TABLE OF CONTENTS

interest income and on net portfolio value of an immediate change in interest rates in 100 basis point increments. Net portfolio value is defined as the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.

The primary tool used by management to measure and manage interest rate exposure is a simulation model. Use of the model to perform simulations reflecting changes in interest rates over one and two-year time horizons has enabled management to develop and initiate strategies for managing exposure to interest rate risk. In its simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income of various changes in interest rates. Projected net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates is modeled based on both

49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

an immediate rise and fall in interest rates (“rate shock”), as well as gradual changes in interest rates over a 12-monthtwelve-month time period. The model is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The model incorporates assumptions regarding earning-assetearning asset and deposit growth, prepayments, interest rates and other factors.

Management believes that both individually and taken together, these assumptions are reasonable, but the complexity of the simulation modeling process results in a sophisticated estimate, not an absolutely precise calculation of exposure. For example, estimates of future cash flows must be made for instruments without contractual maturity or payment schedules.

In prior years, the low level of interest rates had necessitated a modification of the Corporation’s standard rate scenario of a movement down 200 basis points over 12 months to down 100 basis points over a 12-month period. However, given the recent rise in rates for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation has returned to a -200 basis point change down over a 12-month period. Based on the results of the interest simulation model as of December 31, 2007,2009, and assuming that management does not take action to alter the outcome, the Corporation would expect an increase of 3.27 percent in net interest income if interest rates decreased 200 basis points from the current rates in an immediate and parallel shock over a 12-month period. In a rising rate environment, based on the results of the model as of December 31, 2007, the Corporation would expect a decrease of 3.120.52 and 1.66 percent in net interest income if interest rates increased by 200 and 300 basis points, respectively, from current rates in an immediatea gradual and parallel shockrate ramp over a twelve month period. As market rates declined to historic lows at December 31, 2009, the Corporation did not feel that modeling a down rate scenario was realistic in the current environment.

The risingdeclining rates and a flatteningsteepening of the yield curve during 20072009 affected net interest margins. Based on management’s perception that interest rates will continue to be volatile, projected increased levels of prepayments on the earning-asset portfolio and the current level of interest rates, emphasis has been, and is expected to continue to be, placed on interest-sensitivity matching with the objective of stabilizing the net interest spread during 2008.2010. However, no assurance can be given that this objective will be met.

Equity Price Risk

We areThe Corporation is also exposed to equity price risk inherent in ourits portfolio of publicly traded equity securities, which had an estimated fair value of $1.7$0.3 million at December 31, 20072009 and $4.1$0.7 million at December 31, 2006. We monitor our2008. The Corporation monitors its equity investments for impairment on a periodic basis. In the event that the carrying value of the equity investment exceeds its fair value, and we determinethe Corporation determines the decline in value to be other than temporary, we reducethe Corporation reduces the carrying value to its current fair value. During 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recorded $113,000 and $461,000, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to equity holdings in bank stocks. These equities were written down to fair value.

50


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

All Financial Statements:

The following financial statements are filed as part of this report under Item 8 — “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

 
 Page
ReportsReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  F-2 - F-4
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial ReportingF-5 
Consolidated Statements of Condition  F-6F-3 
Consolidated Statements of Income  F-7F-4 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity  F-8F-5 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  F-9F-6 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  F-10F-8 

F-1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Center Bancorp, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) as of December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.2009. Center Bancorp, Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. The consolidated financial statements of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors whose report thereon, dated March 8, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20072009 and 20062008, and the consolidated results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the two years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and 20062009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2006 the Corporation changed its method of accounting for share-based payments and its method of accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Center Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 12, 200816, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ Beard Miller Company LLPParenteBeard LLC

Beard Miller Company LLPParenteBeard LLC
Reading, Pennsylvania
March 12, 200816, 2010

F-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders Center Bancorp, Inc.:

We have audited Center Bancorp, Inc.’s (the Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Center Bancorp, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries and the related consolidated statement of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007 and our report dated March 12,2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Beard Miller Company LLP

Beard Miller Company LLP
Reading, Pennsylvania
March 12, 2008

F-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Center Bancorp, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 8, 2006

F-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Corporation’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management, Board of Directors and shareholders regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As part of the Corporation’s program to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission published in its report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee.

Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2007, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Beard Miller Company LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an audit report on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. The report, which expresses an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, is included in this item under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

CENTER BANCORP, INC.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Anthony C. Weagley

Anthony C. Weagley		President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 12, 2008

F-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

    
 December 31, December 31,
 2007 2006 2009 2008
 (Dollars in Thousands) (In Thousands,
Except Share Data)
ASSETS
                    
Cash and due from banks $20,541  $34,088  $89,168  $15,031 
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell  49,490   10,275 
Total cash and cash equivalents  70,031   44,363 
Investment securities available-for-sale  314,194   250,603   298,124   242,714 
Investment securities held to maturity (approximate fair market value of $0 in 2007 and $130,900 in 2006)  —   131,130 
Total investment securities  314,194   381,733 
Loans, net of unearned income  551,669   550,414 
Less — Allowance for loan losses  5,163   4,960 
Loans  715,453   676,203 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  8,275   6,254 
Net loans  546,506   545,454   707,178   669,949 
Restricted investment in bank stocks, at cost  8,467   7,805   10,672   10,230 
Premises and equipment, net  17,419   18,829   17,860   18,488 
Accrued interest receivable  4,535   4,932   4,033   4,154 
Bank owned life insurance  22,261   21,368   26,304   22,938 
Other real estate owned  —   3,949 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  17,028   17,110 
Prepaid FDIC assessment  5,374   — 
Other assets  17,028   9,588   21,083   18,730 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  17,204   17,312 
Total assets $1,017,645  $1,051,384  $1,196,824  $1,023,293 
LIABILITIES
                    
Deposits:
                    
Non-interest-bearing $111,422  $136,453  $130,518  $113,319 
Interest-bearing:
                    
Time deposits $100 and over  63,997   83,623   144,802   100,493 
Interest-bearing transaction, savings and time deposits $100 and less  523,651   506,695   538,385   445,725 
Total deposits  699,070   726,771   813,705   659,537 
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase  48,541   29,443 
Short-term borrowings  1,123   2,000   46,109   45,143 
Long-term borrowings  168,445   174,991   223,144   223,297 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,155   5,155   5,155 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  10,033   15,411   6,160   8,448 
Total liabilities  932,367   953,771   1,094,273   941,580 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          
Preferred Stock, no par value:
          
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; none issued  —   — 
Stockholders’ Equity
          
Preferred Stock, $1,000 liquidation value per share:
          
Authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 10,000 shares in 2009 and none in 2008  9,619   — 
Common stock, no par value:
                    
Authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 15,190,984 shares at December 31, 2007 and 2006; outstanding 13,155,784 and 13,910,450 shares at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively		  86,908   77,130 
Authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 16,762,412 shares in 2009 and 15,190,984 in 2008; outstanding 14,572,029 shares in 2009 and 12,991,312 in 2008  97,908   86,908 
Additional paid-in capital  5,133   4,535   5,650   5,204 
Retained earnings  15,161   25,989   17,870   16,309 
Treasury stock, at cost (2,035,200 and 1,280,534 shares in 2007 and 2006, respectively)  (16,100)   (6,631) 
Treasury stock, at cost (2,190,383 in 2009 and 2,199,672 shares in 2008)  (17,720)   (17,796) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,824)   (3,410)   (10,776)   (8,912) 
Total stockholders’ equity  85,278   97,613   102,551   81,713 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,017,645  $1,051,384  $1,196,824  $1,023,293 

 
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statementsstatements..

F-6


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

   
 Years Ended December 31,
   2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Interest income:
               
Interest and fees on loans $33,527  $31,999  $25,329 
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
               
Taxable interest income  13,585   15,521   18,849 
Non-taxable interest income  3,171   3,874   4,001 
Dividends  1,242   1,384   2,295 
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreement to resell  604   547   29 
Total interest income  52,129   53,325   50,503 
Interest expense:
               
Interest on certificates of deposit $100 and over  3,964   4,930   3,828 
Interest on other deposits  16,871   13,075   7,771 
Interest on short-term borrowings  1,948   2,063   2,454 
Interest on long-term borrowings  7,847   8,906   9,243 
Total interest expense  30,630   28,974   23,296 
Net interest income  21,499   24,351   27,207 
Provision for loan losses  350   57   — 
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses  21,149   24,294   27,207 
Other income:
               
Service charges, commissions and fees  1,824   1,759   1,922 
Other income  457   454   631 
Annuity and insurance  298   205   193 
Bank owned life insurance  893   780   740 
Net gain (loss) on securities sold  900   (2,565)   350 
Total other income  4,372   633   3,836 
Other expense:
               
Salaries and employee benefits  11,436   12,290   12,108 
Occupancy, net  2,843   2,309   2,165 
Premises and equipment  1,777   1,940   1,990 
Professional and consulting  2,139   1,179   555 
Stationery and printing  465   692   628 
Marketing and advertising  603   731   644 
Computer expense  614   741   594 
Other  4,721   4,476   3,529 
Total other expense  24,598   24,358   22,213 
Income before income tax expense (benefit)  923   569   8,830 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2,933)   (3,329)   1,184 
Net income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 
Earnings per share:
               
Basic $.28  $.28  $.60 
Diluted $.28  $.28  $.60 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
               
Basic  13,780,504   13,959,684   12,678,614 
Diluted  13,840,756   14,040,338   12,725,256 

All common share and per common share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5 percent stock dividend declared on March 29, 2007 and paid on June 1, 2007



See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

      
      
 Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
   Common Stock Amount Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)		 Total
Stockholders’ Equity
   (In Thousands, Except Share Data)
Balance, December 31, 2004 $35,450  $4,477  $31,964  $(3,775)  $527  $68,643 
Comprehensive income:
                              
Net income            7,646             7,646 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes                      (5,169)   (5,169) 
Total comprehensive income                           2,477 
Cash dividends declared ($0.34 per share)            (4,518)             (4,518) 
5 percent stock dividend  6,529        (6,529)             — 
Private placement: Common stock  21,619   (1,120)   (1,621)             18,878 
Issuance of common stock  255        (27)             228 
Exercise of stock option       355        44        399 
Common stock issued in Red Oak Bank acquisition  13,277                       13,277 
Restricted stock award       75        30        105 
Balance, December 31, 2005 $77,130  $3,787  $26,915  $(3,701)  $(4,642)  $99,489 
Comprehensive income:
                              
Net income            3,898             3,898 
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes                      2,047   2,047 
Total comprehensive income                           5,945 
Cash dividends declared ($0.34 per share)            (4,808)             (4,808) 
Issuance of common stock            (16)             (16) 
Exercise of stock option       238        436        674 
Net impact to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of income tax of ($543)                      (815)   (815) 
Stock based compensation expense       160                  160 
Tax benefit related to stock based
compensation		       350                  350 
Treasury stock purchased                 (3,366)        (3,366) 
Balance, December 31, 2006 $77,130  $4,535  $25,989  $(6,631)  $(3,410)  $97,613 
Comprehensive income:
                              
Net income            3,856             3,856 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes                      (2,414)   (2,414) 
Total comprehensive income                           1,442 
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)            (4,885)             (4,885) 
5 percent stock dividend  9,778        (9,778)             — 
Issuance of common stock            (21)             (21) 
Exercise of stock option       292        558        850 
Stock based compensation expense       151                  151 
Tax benefit related to stock based
compensation		       155                  155 
Treasury stock purchased                 (10,027)        (10,027) 
Balance, December 31, 2007 $86,908  $5,133  $15,161  $(16,100)  $(5,824)  $85,278 

Per common share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5 percent stock dividenddeclared on March 29, 2007 and paid on June 1, 2007



See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
 Years Ended December 31,
   20072009 20062008 20052007
   (Dollars in Thousands)Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income$3,856$3,898$7,646
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,7001,8521,827
Provision for loan losses35057—
Provision for deferred taxes(4,939) (5,280) (1,995) 
Stock-based compensation expense151160—
Net (gains) losses on sale of investment securities available-for-sale(312) 2,660(350) 
Net gains on sale of investment securities held-to-maturity(588) (95) —
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable397943(1,342) 
(Increase) decrease in other assets(2,055) 1,0413,526
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities4,057881(1,758) 
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance(893) (780) (740) 
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on
investment securities, net		162210452
Net cash provided by operating activities1,8865,5477,266
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available-for-sale186,371220,415300,541
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities held to maturity9,20610,79332,315
Net (purchases) proceeds from restricted investment in bank stock(662) 3,149(3,589) 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale56,331188,01859,427
Proceeds from sales of investment securities held to maturity10,312517—
Purchase of securities available-for-sale(204,238) (273,744) (297,133) 
Purchase of securities held to maturity(2,000) (2,000) (44,089) 
Net increase in loans(1,402) (44,622) (37,741) 
Property and equipment expenditures, net(182) (2,218) (1,997) 
Cash consideration paid to acquire Red Oak Bank——(13,279) 
Cash and cash equivalents acquired from Red Oak Bank——2,433
Purchase of bank owned life insurance—(2,000) —
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities53,73698,308(3,112) 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits(27,701) 26,170(72,346) 
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings(8,325) (13,102) 26,735
Proceeds from FHLB advances55,00020,000192,439
Payment on FHLB advances(35,000) (94,427) (158,659) 
Redemption of subordinated debentures—(10,310) —
Cash dividends paid(4,885) (4,808) (4,518) 
(Redemption)/issuance of common stock(21) (16) 19,106
Tax benefits from stock based compensation155350—
Exercise of stock options850674399
Purchase of treasury stock(10,027) (3,366) —
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(29,954) (78,835) 3,156
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents25,66825,0207,310
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year44,36319,34312,033
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$70,031$44,363$19,343
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Noncash activities:
Trade date accounting settlement for investments$—$8,083$—
Reclassification of held-to-maturity investment securities to available-for-sale
$113,413$—$—
Reclassification of office building from premises to other assets$2,398$—$—
Cash paid during year for:Interest income:
               
Interest paidand fees on deposits and borrowingsloans $30,72636,751  $28,59436,110  $23,22833,527 
Income taxes$515Interest and dividends on investment securities:  $297  $1,221 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information at Date of Acquisition:Taxable interest income12,72710,35313,585
Non-taxable interest income9892,5473,171
Dividends6437711,242
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell—113604
Total interest income51,11049,89452,129
Interest expense:
               
Fair valueInterest on certificates of assets acquireddeposit $100 and over $3,5512,4113,964
Interest on other deposits8,75710,87616,871
Interest on short-term borrowings4491,2951,948
Interest on long-term borrowings9,8889,5137,847
Total interest expense22,64524,09530,630
Net interest income28,46525,79921,499
Provision for loan losses3,2611,561350
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses25,20424,23821,149
Other income:
Service charges, commissions and fees1,8352,0151,824
Annuity and insurance126112298
Bank-owned life insurance1,1561,203893
Other298420457
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses(9,066) (1,761) —
Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)4,828—  $—
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses(4,238) (1,761) —
Net gains on sale on investment securities4,729655900
Net investment securities gains (losses)491(1,106) 900
Total other income3,9062,6444,372
Other expense:
Salaries and employee benefits9,9158,50511,436
Occupancy, net2,5363,2792,843
Premises and equipment1,2631,4361,777
FDIC Insurance2,05521786
Professional and consulting8117032,139
Stationery and printing339397465
Marketing and advertising366637603
Computer expense964834614
OREO expense, net1,43831110
Other3,3703,4344,525
Total other expense23,05719,47324,598
Income before income tax expense (benefit)6,0537,409923
Income tax expense (benefit)1,4801,567(2,933) 
Net income4,5735,8423,856
Preferred stock dividends and accretion567—  $115,307— 
Goodwill and deposit intangibleNet income available to common stockholders $—4,006  $—5,842  $15,4163,856 
Liabilities assumedEarnings per common share:
Basic $—0.30  $—0.45  $88,5560.28 
Common stock issued for the Red Oak Bank acquisition, netDiluted $—0.30  $—0.45  $13,2770.28
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic13,382,61413,048,51813,780,504
Diluted13,385,41613,061,41013,840,756 

 
 
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statementsstatements..


F-9TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

       
       
 Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
   Preferred
Stock		 Common
Stock		 Additional
Paid In
Capital		 Retained
Earnings		 Treasury
Stock		 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss		 Total
Stockholders’
Equity
   (In Thousands, Except Share and per Share Data)
Balance, December 31, 2006 $—  $77,130  $4,535  $25,989  $(6,631)  $(3,410)  $97,613 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income                 3,856            ��3,856 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes                 (2,414)   (2,414) 
Total comprehensive income                                1,442 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.36 per share)                 (4,885)             (4,885) 
5 percent stock dividend       9,778        (9,778)             — 
Issuance cost of common stock                 (21)             (21) 
Exercise of stock options (95,861 shares)            292        558        850 
Stock-based compensation expense            151                  151 
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation            155                  155 
Treasury stock purchased (850,527 shares)                      (10,027)        (10,027) 
Balance, December 31, 2007 $—  $86,908  $5,133  $15,161  $(16,100)  $(5,824)  $85,278 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income                 5,842             5,842 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes                 (3,088)   (3,088) 
Total comprehensive income                                2,754 
Cash dividends declared on common stock of ($0.36 per share)                 (4,675)             (4,675) 
Issuance cost of common stock                 (19)             (19) 
Restricted stock award (3,028 shares)                      25        25 
Exercise of stock options (25,583 shares)            21        203        224 
Stock-based compensation expense            128                  128 
Taxes related to stock-based compensation            (78)                  (78) 
Treasury stock purchased (193,083 shares)                      (1,924)        (1,924) 
Balance, December 31, 2008 $—  $86,908  $5,204  $16,309  $(17,796)  $(8,912)  $81,713 
Comprehensive income:
                                   
Net income                 4,573             4,573 
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes                 (1,864)   (1,864) 
Total comprehensive income                                2,709 
Issuance of preferred stock (10,000 shares) and warrants (86,705 shares)  9,539        461                  10,000 
Accretion of discount on preferred stock  80             (80)             — 
Dividends on preferred stock                 (487)             (487) 
Proceeds from rights offering (1,571,428 shares)       11,000                       11,000 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.18 per share)                 (2,434)             (2,434) 
Issuance cost of common stock                 (11)             (11) 
Exercise of stock options (9,289 shares)            (19)        76        57 
Stock-based compensation expense            77                  77 
Taxes related to stock-based compensation            (73)                  (73) 
Balance, December 31, 2009 $9,619  $97,908  $5,650  $17,870  $(17,720)  $(10,776)  $102,551 



See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
 Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income $4,573  $5,842  $3,856 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Operating Activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization  1,451   1,832   1,700 
Provision for loan losses  3,261   1,561   350 
Provision (benefit) for deferred taxes  1,353   1,221   (4,939) 
Stock-based compensation expense  77   128   151 
Proceeds from restricted stock  —   25   — 
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses  4,238   1,761   — 
Net gains on available-for-sale securities  (4,729)   (655)   (312) 
Net gains on sale of held-to-maturity securities  —   —   (588) 
Net loss on premises and equipment  —   51   — 
Net loss on OREO  905   26      
Life insurance death benefit  (136)   (230)   — 
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance  (1,020)   (973)   (893) 
Net amortization of securities  793   90   162 
Decrease in accrued interest receivable  121   381   397 
Increase in other assets  (7,319)   (7,332)   (2,055) 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities  54   (4,432)   4,057 
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities  3,622   (704)   1,886 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available-for-sale  58,206   52,702   186,371 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities held to maturity  —   —   9,206 
Net purchases of restricted investment in bank stock  (442)   (1,763)   (662) 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale  665,828   330,808   56,331 
Proceeds from sales of investment securities held to maturity  —   —   10,312 
Purchase of securities available-for-sale  (785,044)   (315,899)   (204,238) 
Purchase of securities held to maturity  —   —   (2,000) 
Net increase in loans  (40,490)   (125,004)   (1,402) 
Purchases of premises and equipment  (742)   (2,882)   (182) 
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance  (2,475)   —   — 
Proceeds from life insurance death benefits  266   526   — 
Capital expenditure addition to OREO  (476)   —   — 
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment  1   24   — 
Proceeds from sale of branch facility  —   2,414   — 
Proceeds from sale of OREO  3,520   452   — 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (101,848)   (58,622)   53,736 



See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – (continued)

   
 Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net increase (decrease) in deposits  154,168   (39,533)   (27,701) 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings  966   (4,521)   (8,325) 
Proceeds from long-term borrowings  —   55,000   55,000 
Payments on long-term borrowings  (153)   (148)   (35,000) 
Cash dividends on common stock  (3,166)   (4,675)   (4,885) 
Cash dividends on preferred stock  (425)   —   — 
Issuance cost of common stock  (11)   (19)   (21) 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants  10,000   —   — 
Proceeds from issuance of shares from rights offering  11,000   —   — 
Tax (expense) benefit from stock based compensation  (73)   (78)   155 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  57   224   850 
Purchase of treasury stock  —   (1,924)   (10,027) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  172,363   4,326   (29,954) 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  74,137   (55,000)   25,668 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  15,031   70,031   44,363 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $89,168  $15,031  $70,031 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Noncash activities:
               
Trade date accounting settlement for investments $1,979  $3,514  $— 
Transfer of loans to real estate owned  —   3,949   — 
Transfer of loan participation to other receivables  5,054   —   — 
Reclassification of held-to-maturity investment securities to available-for-sale  —   —   113,413 
Reclassification of office building from premises to other assets  —   —   2,398 
Cash paid during year for:
               
Interest paid on deposits and borrowings $23,021  $23,615  $30,726 
Income taxes  344   2,370   515 



See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Corporation”) are prepared on the accrual basis and include the accounts of the Parent Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank (the “Bank” and collectively with the Parent Corporation and the Parent Corporation’s other direct and indirect subsidiaries, the “Corporation”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Business

The Parent Corporation is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of Union Center National Bank as mentioned above. The Bank provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers through branch locations in Union and Morris counties, New Jersey. Additionally, the Bank originates residential mortgage loans and services such loans for others. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions and the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of condition and revenues and expenses for the reported periods. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment evaluation of securities, the evaluation of the impairment of goodwill and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Cash and Cash EquivalentsDue From Banks

Cash and cash equivalents includeDue From Banks includes cash on hand and balances due from correspondent banks federal funds sold, and securities purchased under agreement to resell which are generally available within one day.including the Federal Reserve Bank.

Investment Securities

The Corporation accounts for its investment securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“SFAS”FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities.”Securities”). Investments are classified into the following categories: (1) held to maturity securities, for which the Corporation has both the positive intent and ability to hold until maturity, which are reported at amortized cost; (2) trading securities, which are purchased and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings; and (3) available-for-sale securities, which do not meet the criteria of the other two categories and which management believes may be sold prior to maturity due to changes in interest rates, prepayment, risk, liquidity or other factors, and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of applicable income taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, which is included in stockholders’ equity and excluded from earnings.

Investment securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, which are recognized on a level yield method, as adjustments to interest income. Investment securities gains or losses are determined using the specific identification method.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Corporation reclassified all of its held-to-maturity investment securities to available-for-sale. The transfer of these securities to available-for-sale will allowallowed the Corporation

F-10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

greater flexibility in managing its investment portfolio. Investment securities with a total of $113.4 million and a fair value of $112.9 million were transferred to available-for-sale during the fourth quarter.quarter of 2007. The unrealized loss on these securities was recorded, net of tax, as accumulated other comprehensive income, an adjustment to stockholders’ equity. As

Securities are evaluated on at least a result,quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 320-10-65 (previously SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Investments”), which was adopted as of June 30, 2009. The accounting standard clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other–than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Prior to the June 30, 2009 adoption, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.

In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FASB ASC 320-10-65 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized through earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized through other comprehensive income. Impairment charges on certain investment securities of approximately $4.2 million and $1.8 million were recognized in earnings during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No impairment charges were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of costs or estimated fair value or fair value under the fair value option accounting guidance for financial instruments. For loans carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, gains and losses on loan sales (sale proceeds minus carrying value) are recorded in other income and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in other income upon sale of the loan. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation will not classify any future purchases of investment securities as held-to-maturityheld no loans for at least two years.sale.

Loans

Loans are stated at their principal amounts less net deferred loan origination fees. Interest income is credited as earned except when a loan becomes past due 90 days or more and doubt exists as to the ultimate collection of interest or principal; in those cases the recognition of income is discontinued. Loans that are past due 90 days or more that are both well secured and in the process of collection will remain on an accruing basis. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to the loan’s yield using the level yield method.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is maintained at a level determined adequate to provide for potentialprobable loan losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. The allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions, the volume and nature of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience and individual credit situations.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

The ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in the real estate market and economic conditions in the State of New Jersey and the impact of such conditions on the creditworthiness of the borrowers.

Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. While management uses available information to recognize loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

The Corporation accounts for impaired loans in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35 (previously SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, as amended by SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosures.”Disclosures”). The value of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The Corporation has defined its population of impaired loans to include at a minimum,all non-accrual loans and troubled debt restructuring loans. As part of the evaluation, the Corporation reviews for impairment all non-homogeneous loans internally classified as substandard or below, in each instance above an established dollar threshold of $200,000. All$200,000, as well as all non-homogeneous loans below the established dollar thresholdgreater than $1.0 million. Smaller impaired non-homogeneous loans and impaired homogeneous loans are considered homogenousnot measured for specific reserves and are collectively evaluated for impairment.covered under the Corporation’s general reserve.

F-11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Reserve for Unfunded Commitments

The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience, and credit risk. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other non-interest expense.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost and bank premises and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation based on estimated useful lives of assets, computed principally on a straight-line basis. Expenditures for maintenanceandmaintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred; major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Gains and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

losses on sales or other dispositions are recorded as a component of other income or other expenses. In September 2007, the Corporation reclassified its Florham Park office building from premises to held for sale, which iswas included in other assets, and entered into a contract to sell that property. On February 29, 2008, the Corporation completed the sale of the property for $2.4 million, which approximated the carrying value.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned (“OREO”), representing property acquired through foreclosure and held for sale, are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosures,Subsequently, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Costs relating to holding the assets are charged to expenses.

During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation sold the residential condominium project in Union County, New Jersey, which was carried as OREO. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had no OREO. The decrease from December 31, 2008 represented a writedown of $926,000 of the carrying value and subsequent sale of the project in the third quarter of 2009.

Mortgage Servicing

The Corporation performs various servicing functions on loans owned by others. A fee, usually based on a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loan, is received for those services. At December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, the Corporation was servicing approximately $12.1$7.6 million and $13.4$10.0 million, respectively, of loans for others.

The Corporation accounts for its transfers and servicing of financial assets in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”FASB ASC 860-50. The Corporation originates mortgages under plans to sell those loans and service the loans owned by the investor. The Corporation records mortgage servicing rights and the loans based on relative fair values at the date of sale. The balance of mortgage servicing rights at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 are immaterial to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of aggregated costs or estimated fair value. Gains and losses on sales of loans are also accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 134 “Accounting for Mortgage Securities retained after Securitizations or Mortgage Loans Held for Sale by a Mortgage Banking Enterprise.” At December 31, 2007, the Corporation held no loans for sale and at December 31, 2006, had approximately $1.5 million in loans held for sale.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Corporation has a non-contributory pension plan covering all eligible employees.employees up until September 30, 2007, at which time the Corporation froze its defined benefit pension plan. As such, all future benefit accruals in this pension plan were discontinued and all retirement benefits that employees would have earned as of September 30, 2007 were preserved. The Corporation’s policy is to fund at least the minimum contribution required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The costs associated with the plan are accrued based on actuarial assumptions and included in non-interestother expense.

F-12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The Corporation follows the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 132 “Employer’s Disclosures about Pensions and Other Post Retirement Benefits” which was revisedaccounts for its defined benefit pension plan in December 2004. SFAS No. 132, as revised SFAS No. 132(R), required additional employers’ disclosures about pension and other post retirement benefit plans after December 31, 2004. Certain disclosures related to estimated future benefit payments are effective for fiscal years ended after June 15, 2005. Net pension expense consists of service costs, interest cost, return on pension assets and amortization of unrecognized initial net assets.

SFAS No. 158

In September 2006, theaccordance with FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An Amendment ofASC 715-30. FASB No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158ASC 715-30 requires that the funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans be recognized on the Corporation’s statement of condition and changes in the funded status be reflected in other comprehensive income, effective for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2006. SFAS 158income. FASB ASC 715-30 also requires companies to measure the funded status of the plan as of the date of its fiscal year-end, effective for fiscal years endingended after December 15, 2008. Early adoption was encouraged. The Corporation expects to adopthad early adopted this statement and the measurement provisions of SFAS 158 effective December 31, 2008. Based uponadoption did not have a material effect on the December 31, 2006 statement of condition and pension disclosures, the impact of adopting SFAS 158 resulted in an after-tax increase in the accumulated other comprehensive loss of $815,000.Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006,Stock compensation accounting guidance (FASB ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”) requires that the Corporation adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method and therefore has not restated results for prior periods. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2006 includes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted, but not yet vested, as of December 31, 2005,cost related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance withof the original provisionsequity or liability instruments issued. The stock compensation accounting guidance covers a wide range of SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. The stock-basedshare-based compensation expensearrangements including stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Stock compensation accounting guidance requires that compensation cost for all stock-basedstock awards be calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation awards granted after that datecost is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). The Corporation will recognize these expensesrecognized on a straight-line methodbasis over the requisite service period offor the stock award, whichentire award. A Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the vesting term. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Corporation recognized stock-based compensation expense in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Corporation presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercisefair value of stock options orwhile the issuance of shares under other stock based compensation programs as operating cash flows in the statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 123 requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits of deductions in excessmarket price of the compensation cost be recognizedCorporation’s common stock at the date of grant is used for stock-based awards to be classified as financing cash flows. In March of 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) regarding the SEC’s interpretation of SFAS No. 123(R) and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Corporation has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). SAB No. 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment,”restricted stock awards. See Note 16 of the Staff Accounting Bulletin series. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experienceNotes to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 is effective January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect SAB 1000 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 of the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion.

Earnings per Share

Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes any additional common shares as if all potentially dilutive common shares were issued (e.g. stock options). The Corporation’s

F-13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted EPS include the effect of stock options outstanding using the Treasury Stock Method, which are not included in the calculation of basic EPS.

Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:

      
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
 (In Thousands, Except per Share Amounts) (In Thousands, Except per Share Amounts)
Net income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646  $4,573  $5,842  $3,856 
Preferred stock dividends and accretion  567   —   — 
Net income available to common stockholders $4,006  $5,842  $3,856 
Average number of common shares outstanding  13,781   13,960   12,679   13,382   13,049   13,781 
Effect of dilutive options  60   80   46   3   12   60 
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share  13,841   14,040   12,725   13,385   13,061   13,841 
Earnings per share
               
Earnings per common share:
               
Basic $.28  $.28  $.60  $0.30  $0.45  $0.28 
Diluted $.28  $.28  $.60  $0.30  $0.45  $0.28 

Treasury Stock

The Corporation announced on March 27, 2006 that its Board of Directors approved an increase in its then current share buyback program to 5 percent of outstanding shares, enhancing its then current authorization by 425,825 shares to 684,965 shares. The Corporation announced on October 1, 2007 that its Board of Directors approved an additional increase in its current share buyback program to 5 percent of outstanding shares, enhancing its current authorization by 684,627 shares. On June 26, 2008, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors approved an additional buyback of 649,712 shares. The total buyback authorization has been increased to 1,390,0192,039,731 shares. RepurchasesSubject to limitations applicable to the Corporation, purchases may be made from time to time as, in the opinion of management, market conditions warrant, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Shares repurchased will be added to the corporate treasury and will be used for future stock dividends and other issuances. As of December 31, 2007,2009, Center Bancorp had 13.214.6 million shares of common stock outstanding. As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation had purchased 1,193,7801,386,863 common shares at an average cost per share of $11.68$11.44 under the stock buyback program as amended on October 1, 2007.2007 and June 26, 2008. The repurchased shares were recorded as Treasury Stock, which resulted in a decrease in stockholders’ equity. Treasury stock is recorded using the cost method and accordingly is presented as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation did not purchase any of its shares.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Goodwill

Goodwill representsThe Corporation adopted the excessprovisions of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill isFASB ASC 350-10 (previously SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), which requires that goodwill to be tested at leastfor impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise for impairment. No impairment of goodwillcharge was recordeddeemed necessary for the twelve-monthsyears ended December 31, 20072009, 2008 and 2006.2007.

Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Corporation’s other comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and an adjustment to reflect the curtailmentunrecognized actuarial gains and losses of the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan, net of taxes.

Disclosure of comprehensive income for the years ended 2007, 2006December 31, 2009, 2008 and 20052007 is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and presented in detail in Note 5.14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Bank OwnedBank-Owned Life Insurance

During 2001, the Corporation invested $12.5 million in Bank OwnedBank-Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) to help offset the rising cost of employee benefits, and made subsequent investments in 2004 of $2.5 million and in 2006 of $2.0 million. During 2009, the Corporation invested $2.5 million in additional BOLI policies. The change in the cash surrender value of the BOLI was recorded as a component of other income and amounted to $1,020,000, $973,000 and $893,000 $780,000in 2009, 2008 and $740,0002007, respectively. During 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $136,000 and $230,000, respectively, in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

F-14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summarytax-free proceeds in excess of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

contract value on its BOLI due to the death of insured participants.

Income Taxes

The Corporation recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which the differences are expected to be settled. Income tax-related interest and penalties are classified as a component of income tax expense.

Advertising Costs

The Corporation recognizes its marketing and advertising cost as incurred. Advertising costs were $603,000, $731,000$366,000, $637,000 and $644,000$603,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Stock Dividends

All common share and per common share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 5 percent stock dividend declared on March 29, 2007 and paid on June 1, 2007.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in the consolidated financial statements for 20062008 and 20052007 to conform to the classifications presented in 2007.

Note 2 — Stock Based Compensation

At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had four stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully below. Through December 31, 2005, the Corporation accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations.”

Stock Option Plans

At December 31, 2007, the Corporation maintained two stock-based compensation plans from which new grants could be issued. The Corporation’s Stock Option Plans permit Parent Corporation common stock to be issued to key employees and directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The options granted under the plans are intended to be either Incentive Stock Options or Non-qualified Options. Under the 1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, an aggregate of 228,151 shares remain available under the plan and are authorized for issuance. Under the 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, an aggregate total of 457,007 shares remain. Such shares may be treasury shares, newly issued shares or a combination thereof.

Options have been granted to purchase common stock principally at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options are exercisable over a three year vesting period starting one year after the date of grant and generally expire ten years from the date of grant.

The total compensation expense related to these plans was $151,000 and $160,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Prior to December 31, 2005, the Corporation accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB 25. Accordingly, the Corporation generally recognized compensation expense only when it granted options with a discounted exercise price. As a result during that period, no stock-based employee compensation expense or any resulting compensation expense was recognized ratably over the associated service period, which was generally the option vesting term.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Corporation adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the modified prospective transition method and therefore has not restated prior period results. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense for fiscal 2006 included compensation expense for all2009.

F-15


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2 — Stock Based Compensation  – (continued)Recent Accounting Pronouncements

stock-based compensation awards grantedOn June 29, 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 105-10-65 (previously SFAS No. 168, “Accounting Standards CodificationTMand the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”(“Codification”)). This Codification is the sole source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, for most entities. On the effective date, all non-SEC accounting and reporting standards will be superseded. The Corporation adopted the Codification for the quarterly period ended. September 30, 2009, as required, and there was not a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements taken as a whole. In order to ease the transition to the Codification, the Corporation has provided the Codification cross-reference along side the references to the standards issued and adopted prior to but not yet vested asthe adoption of December 31, 2005, based on the grant dateCodification.

In April 2009, the FASB issued three amendments to the fair value estimatedmeasurement, disclosure and other-than-temporary impairment standards:

FASB ASC 820-10-65 (previously SFAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions that are Not Orderly”).
FASB ASC 320-10-65 (previously SFAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”).
FASB ASC 825-10 (previously SFAS 107 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”).

FASB ASC 820-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FASB ASC 820-10-05 provides additional guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.

FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10-05.

FASB ASC 820-10-65 clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the original provisionsvolume and level of SFAS 123. Stock-based compensation expenseactivity for all share-based payment awards granted after December 31, 2005the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of evidence to determine whether the transaction is based onorderly. It also provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.

FASB ASC 320-10-65 amends other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities and expands disclosure requirements for other-than-temporarily impaired debt and equity securities. FASB ASC 320-10-65 requires companies to record other-than-temporary impairment charges, through earnings, if they have the grant-dateintent to sell, or will more likely than not be required to sell, an impaired debt security before a recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, FASB ASC 320-10-65 requires companies to record other-than-temporary impairment charges through earnings for the amount of credit losses, regardless of the intent or requirement to sell. Credit loss is measured as the difference between the present value of an impaired debt security’s cash flows and its amortized cost basis. Non-credit related write-downs to fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. The Corporation recognizes these compensation costs net of a forfeiture rate and recognizes the compensation costs for only those shares expectedmust be recorded as decreases to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of 3 years. The Corporation estimated the forfeiture rate for fiscal 2006 based on its historical experience during the preceding seven fiscal years.

For the twelve-months ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation’saccumulated other comprehensive income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $151,000 and $100,000, respectively,as long as a result of the compensation expense relatedcompany has no intent or requirement to stock options. For the twelve-months ended December 31, 2006, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $160,000 and $105,000, respectively.sell an

Under the principal option plans, the Corporation may grant restricted stock awards to certain employees. Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards. Restricted stock awards are independent of option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the release of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest within 30 days to five years from the date of grant. During that period, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and is considered to be currently issued and outstanding. The Corporation expenses the cost of the restricted stock awards, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. There were no restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006. There were no restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006.

There were 38,203 and 34,730 shares granted at June 1, 2007, and at June 1, 2006, respectively. The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted average fair values:

   
 December 31, 2007 December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005
Weighted average fair value of grants $6.48  $5.25  $3.87 
Risk-free interest rate  4.92%   5.03%   3.90% 
Dividend yield  2.51%   2.70%   3.08% 
Expected volatility  47.4%   49.5%   30.1% 
Expected life in months  72   72   72 

Option activity under the principal option plans as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the twelve-months ended December 31, 2007, as adjusted for the 5 percent stock dividend, were as follows:

    
 Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate Intrinsic Value
     (In Years) 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006  340,850  $10.15           
Granted  38,203   15.73           
Exercised  (95,761)   8.88           
Forfeited/cancelled/expired  (18,937)   12.25           
Outstanding at December 31, 2007  264,355  $11.27   6.32  $309,818 
Exercisable at December 31, 2007  188,273  $10.38   5.43  $300,554 

F-16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 2 — Stock Based CompensationRecent Accounting Pronouncements  – (continued)

The aggregate intrinsic valueimpaired security before a recovery of options above represents the total pretax intrinsic value (the difference between the Corporation’s closing stock price on the last trading dayamortized cost basis. Finally, FASB 320-10-65 requires companies to record all previously recorded non-credit related other-than-temporary impairment charges for debt securities as cumulative effect adjustments to retained earnings as of the twelve-months of fiscal 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2007. This amount changes based on the fair market valuebeginning of the Parent Corporation’s stock.

As of December 31, 2007, $543,160 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years. Changes in options outstanding during the past three years, as adjusted for the 5 percent stock dividend, were as follows:adoption.

  
Stock Option Plan Shares Exercise Price Range per Share
Outstanding, December 31, 2004 (178,562 shares
exercisable)		  249,042  $4.30 to $15.12 
Granted during 2005  160,497  $6.11 to $10.66 
Exercised during 2005  (12,745)  $4.30 to $6.08 
Expired or canceled during 2005  (5)  $6.07 
Outstanding, December 31, 2005 (323,946 shares
exercisable)		  396,789  $5.15 to $15.12 
Granted during 2006  34,730  $12.54 
Exercised during 2006  (90,669)  $5.15 to $10.66 
Expired or canceled during 2006  —   — 
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 (262,527 shares
exercisable)		  340,850  $6.07 to $15.12 
Granted during 2007  38,203  $15.73 
Exercised during 2007  (95,761)  $6.07 to $10.66 
Expired or canceled during 2007  (18,937)  $10.50 to $15.73 
Outstanding, December 31, 2007 (188,273 shares
exercisable)		  264,355  $6.07 to $15.73 

The following table summarizes theFASB ASC 825-10-65 (previously SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1) requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FASB ASC 825-10 also requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.

All three FASB ASC’s discussed herein include substantial additional disclosure requirements. The effective date for these new ASC’s is the stock options granted duringsame: interim and annual reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted these ASC’s at June 30, 2009 and there was not a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On May 28, 2009, the three years ended December 31, 2007, 2006FASB issued FASB ASC 855-10 (previously SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events”). Under FASB ASC 855-10-05, companies are required to evaluate events and 2005, as adjustedtransactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued, or available to be issued in the case of non-public entities. FASB ASC 855-10-05 requires entities to recognize in the financial statements the effect of all events or transactions that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date, including the estimates inherent in the financial preparation process. Entities shall not recognize the impact of events or transactions that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the balance sheet date but arose after that date. FASB ASC 855-10 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. FASB ASC 855-10 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 855-10-05 for the 5 percent stock dividend.quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard had no material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

      
 2007 2006 2005
   Options Granted Weighted Average Fair Value Options Granted Weighted Average Fair Value Options Granted Weighted Average
Fair Value
Incentive stock options  —  $—   —  $—   57,240  $4.73 
Non-qualifying stock options  —  $—   —  $—   68,523  $3.12 
Director’s plan  38,203  $6.48   34,730  $5.25   34,734  $3.12 
Total  38,203  $6.48   34,730  $5.25   160,497  $3.87 

Note 3 — GoodwillOn June 12, 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets” (“FAS 166”), which was incorporated into ASC 860 “Transfers and Other IntangibleServicing”, and SFAS No.167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(Revised), which was incorporated into ASC 810 “Consolidation” (“FAS 167”), which change the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose entities.

FAS 166 is a revision to FASB ASC 860-10 (previously SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill allocated and Extinguishments of Liabilities”) and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing exposure to the Corporationrisks related to transferred financial assets. FAS 166 also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures.

FAS 167 changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.

Both FAS 166 and FAS 167 will be effective as of December 31, 2007the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period and 2006 was $16,804,000. There were no changes infor interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of FAS 166 shall be applied to transfers that occur on or after the carrying amount of goodwill duringeffective date. The Corporation will adopt both FAS 166 and FAS 167 on January 1, 2010, as required. The Corporation is currently assessing the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

The current year and estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was $120,000 and $108,000 forimpact this adoption may have on the years 2006 and 2007, respectively, and $94,747, $81,972, $69,197, $56,422 and $43,647, respectively, for the subsequent five year period 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

F-17


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 3 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets  – (continued)

   
 Gross Carrying
Amount		 Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount
   (Dollars in Thousands)
As of December 31, 2007:
               
Core deposits $703  $(303)  $400 
Total intangible assets  703   (303)   400 
As of December 31, 2006:
               
Core deposits $703  $(195)  $508 
Other  5   (5)   0 
Total intangible assets  708   (200)   508 
As of December 31, 2005:
               
Core deposits  703   (75)   628 
Other  24   (19)   5 
Total intangible assets $727  $(94)  $633 

Note 4 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SFAS No. 155

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140” (“SFAS 155”), which amends Statement No. 133 to simplify the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments (hybrid financial instruments) by permitting fair value re-measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise required bifurcation, provided that the entire hybrid financial instrument is accounted for on a fair value basis. SFAS 155 also establishes the requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, which replaces the interim guidance in Derivative Instrument Group Issue D1, Recognition and Measurement of Derivatives: Application of Statement No. 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. SFAS 155 amends SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 (“SFAS 140”), to allow a qualifying special-purpose entity to hold a derivative financial instrument that pertains to beneficial interests other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption allowed. The Corporation adopted SFAS 155 effective January 1, 2007 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

SFAS No. 156

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets: an amendment of SFAS No. 140” (“SFAS 156”). This statement requires all separately recognized servicing rights to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. For each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities, this statement permits the Corporation to choose either to report servicing assets and liabilities at fair value or at amortized cost. Under the fair value approach, servicing assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value recorded in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. Under the amortized cost method, servicing assets and liabilities are amortized in proportion to and over the period of net servicing income or net servicing loss and are assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. Adoption of this statement is required for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Corporation adopted SFAS 156 effective January 1, 2007 and is applying the requirements for recognition and initial measurement of servicing assets and liabilities prospectively to all transactions. The Corporation is using the amortized cost method for subsequent

F-18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 42 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements  – (continued)

measurementIn November 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of servicing rights. Adoptionfinancial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). IFRS is a comprehensive series of SFAS 156 did notaccounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board. Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as 2014. The SEC will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have a material effect on the Corporation’sits consolidated financial condition, resultsstatements, and it will continue to monitor the development of operations or cash flows.the potential implementation of IFRS.

FIN 48

In July 2006,December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes —ASC 715-20-65-2 (previously FSP FAS 132(R)-1 “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”). This ASC amends FASB ASC 715-20-65-2 (previously SFAS 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”) to provide guidance on an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that companies recognize in their financial statements the impactemployer’s disclosures about plan assets of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The provisions of FIN 48 are effectivedisclosures about plan assets required by this ASC shall be provided for fiscal years beginningending after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings.2009. The Corporation has adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.

The adoption of FIN 48 did not impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. At January 1, 2007, the Corporation had unrecognized tax benefits of $1.1 million, which primarily related to uncertainty regarding the sustainability of certain deductions to be taken in 2007 and future U.S. Federal income tax returns related to the liquidation of the Corporation’s New Jersey REIT subsidiaries. To the extent these unrecognized tax benefits are ultimately recognized, they will impact the effective tax rate in a future period. At December 31, 2007, the Corporation had recorded as a component of tax expense approximately $61,131 in interest expense related to the unrecognized tax benefit.

FSP FIN 48-1

In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 “Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48” (“FSP FIN 48-1”). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively to January 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not have aand the adoption had no material impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

SFAS No. 157

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to US GAAP guidance requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements

In December 2007, the FASB issued proposed FSP 157-b, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” that would permit a one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of Statement No. 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities (non-financial items) that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Therefore, if the change in fair value of a non-financial item is not required to be recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on an annual basis or more frequently, the effective date of application of Statement 157 to that item is deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. This deferral does not apply, however, to an entity that applies Statement 157 in interim or annual financial statements before proposed FSP 157-b is finalized. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of FSP 157-b will have on the Company’s operating income or net earnings.

EITF 06-4

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements”, was ratified. This EITF Issue addresses accounting for separate agreements which split life insurance policy

F-19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements  – (continued)

benefits between an employer and employee. The Issue requires the employer to recognize a liability for future benefits payable to the employee under these agreements. The effects of applying this Issue must be recognized through either a change in accounting principle through an adjustment to equity or through the retrospective application to all prior periods. For calendar year companies, the Issue is effective beginning January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of the Issue to have a material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

EITF 06-5

In September 2006, EITF Issue No. 06-5, “Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance — Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4, Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance,” was issued. The Task Force reached a consensus that a policyholder should consider any additional amounts included in the contractual terms of the policy in determining the amount that could be realized under the insurance contract.

The Task Force also reached a consensus that a policyholder should determine the amount that could be realized under the life insurance contract assuming the surrender of an individual-life by individual-life policy (or certificate by certificate in a group policy). Furthermore, the Task Force reached a consensus that the cash surrender value should not be discounted when contractual limitations on the ability to surrender a policy exist if the policy continues to operate under its normal terms (continues to earn interest) during the restriction period. The consensus is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Corporation has adopted the Issue as of January 1, 2007 and the adoption of the Issue has had no material impact on the consolidated financial statements, results of operations or cash flows of the Corporation.

FSP FAS 158-1

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 158-1, “Conforming Amendments to the Illustrations in FASB Statements No. 87, No. 88, and No. 106 and to the Related Staff Implementation Guides.” This FSP makes conforming amendments to other FASB statements and staff implementation guides and provides technical corrections to SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.” The conforming amendments in this FSP shall be applied upon adoption of SFAS No. 158. The Corporation believes its adoption of FSP FAS 158-1 will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

SFAS No. 159

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS159”). SFAS 159 provides all entities with the option of reporting selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve financial reporting by providing opportunities to mitigate volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. Most of the provisions in this statement apply only to entities which elect SFAS 159. However the amendment to FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, applies to entities with available for sale and trading securities, and requires an entity to present separately fair value and non-fair value securities. SFAS159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

EITF 06-10

In March 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-10 “Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements” (“EITF 06-10”). EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment agreement. EITF 06-10 is effective for fiscal years

F-20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements  – (continued)

beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation currently does not expect the impact of EITF 06-10 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

EITF 06-11

In June 2007, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 states that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on nonvested equity shares, nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional paid in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid in capital should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 should be applied prospectively to income tax benefits of dividends on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are declared in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation expects that EITF 06-11 will not have an impact on its consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 141(R)

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R)’s objective is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 31, 2008. This new pronouncement will impact the Corporation’s accounting for business combinations completed beginning January 1, 2009.

SFAS No. 160

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160’s objective is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 shall be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Corporation does not expect the implementation of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

SAB 109

Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109 (“SAB 109”), “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings” expresses the views of the staff regarding written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings under generally accepted accounting principles. To make the staff’s views consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance, the SAB revises and rescinds portions of SAB No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.” Specifically, the SAB revises the SEC staff’s views on incorporating expected net future cash flows related to loan servicing activities in the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment. The SAB retains the staff’s views on incorporating expected net future cash flows related to internally-developed intangible assets in the fair value measurement of a written loan commitment. The staff expects registrants to apply the views in Question 1 of SAB 109 on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. The Corporation does not expect SAB 109 to have a material impact on its financial statements.

SAB 110

SAB No. 110 amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based Payment,” of the Staff Accounting Bulletin series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain vanilla”

F-21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements  – (continued)

share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 is effective January 1, 2008. The Corporation does not expect SAB 1000 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 5 — Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Corporation’s other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and an adjustment to reflect the curtailment of the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan, net of taxes.

Disclosure of comprehensive income for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity. The table below provides a reconciliation of the components of other comprehensive income to the disclosure provided in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.

The components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, were as follows for the following fiscal years ended December 31:

   
 Before Tax Amount Tax Benefit (Expense) Net of Tax Amount
   (Dollars in Thousands)
For the year ended 2007:
               
Net unrealized losses on available for sale securities
               
Net unrealized holding losses arising during period
 $(3,455)  $1,054  $(2,401) 
Less reclassification adjustment for net gains arising during the period  312   (109)   203 
Net unrealized losses  (3,767)   1,163   (2,604) 
Market value adjustment on securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale  (459)   187   (272) 
Other changes in pension plan recognized in other comprehensive income:
 
Net actuarial loss  (583)   233   (350) 
Curtailment  1,353   (541)   812 
Other comprehensive loss, net $(3,456)  $1,042  $(2,414) 
For the year ended 2006:
                         
Net unrealized losses on available for sale securities
               
Net unrealized holding losses arising during period
 $(16)  $6  $(10) 
Less reclassification adjustment for net losses arising during the period  (2,565)   640   (1,925) 
Net unrealized gains  2,549  $(634)   1,915 
Change in minimum pension liability  219   (87)   132 
Other comprehensive income, net $2,768  $(721)  $2,047 
For the year ended 2005:
               
Net unrealized losses on available for sale securities
 
Net unrealized holding losses arising during period
 $(7,981)  $2,752  $(5,229) 
Less reclassification adjustment for net gains arising during the period  350   (119)   231 
Net unrealized losses  (7,631)   2,633   (4,998) 
Change in minimum pension liability  (171)   —   (171) 
Other comprehensive loss, net $(7,802)  $2,633  $(5,169) 

F-22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 63 — Cash and Due from Banks

The subsidiary bank, Union Center National Bank, maintained cash balances reserved to meet regulatory requirements of the Federal Reserve Board of approximately $779,000$4,050,000 and $249,000$2,900,000 at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively.

Note 74 — Investment Securities

The following table’stables present information related to the Corporation’s portfolio of securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale at December 31, 20072009 and 2006.2008.

     
     December 31, 2009
 December 31, 2007 Amortized
Cost		 Gross
Unrealized
Gains		 Gross Unrealized Losses Estimated
Fair Value
 Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized Gains		 Gross
Unrealized Losses		 Estimated Fair Value Non-Credit
OTTI		 Other
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                                             
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities $100  $1  $—  $101 
Federal Agency Obligations  109,975   242   (1,226)   108,991 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions  83,246   428   (337)   83,337 
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $2,089  $—  $—  $—  $2,089 
Federal agency obligations  216,640   592   —   (2,647)   214,585 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  19,688   77   —   (484)   19,281 
Trust preferred securities  34,404   113   (2,457)   (5,345)   26,715 
Other debt securities  120,859   224   (7,137)   113,946   33,317   76   (2,371)   (1,101)   29,921 
Equity securities  7,973   462   (616)   7,819   5,936   42   —   (445)   5,533 
 $322,153  $1,357  $(9,316)  $314,194 
Total $312,074  $900  $(4,828)  $(10,022)  $298,124 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

    
 December 31, 2006
   Amortized Cost Gross
Unrealized Gains		 Gross
Unrealized Losses		 Estimated Fair Value
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities Held-to-Maturity:
                    
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities $511  $18  $—  $529 
Federal Agency Obligations  30,056   17   (531)   29,542 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions  58,780   549   (348)   58,981 
Other debt securities  41,783   815   (750)   41,848 
   $131,130  $1,399  $(1,629)  $130,900 
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                    
U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities $100  $—  $—  $100 
Federal Agency Obligations  107,343   —   (3,694)   103,649 
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions  28,202   32   (578)   27,656 
Other debt securities  98,502   253   (916)   97,839 
Equity securities  20,648   711   —   21,359 
   $254,795  $996  $(5,188)  $250,603 
    
 December 31, 2008
   Amortized
Cost		 Gross
Unrealized
Gains		 Gross
Unrealized
Losses		 Estimated Fair
Value
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale:
                    
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $100  $—  $—  $100 
Federal agency obligations  81,919   1,087   (209)   82,797 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  51,926   436   (268)   52,094 
Trust preferred securities  39,050   —   (7,279)   31,771 
Other debt securities  63,104   82   (3,824)   59,362 
Equity securities  17,247   —   (657)   16,590 
Total $253,346  $1,605  $(12,237)  $242,714 

All of the Corporation’s investment securities are classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2007.2009 and 2008. The available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in equity, net of taxes. Accordingly, the carrying value of such securities reflects their fair value at the balance sheet date. Fair value is based onupon either quoted market prices.

F-23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

prices, or in certain cases where there is limited activity in the market for a particular instrument, assumptions are made to determine their fair value. See Note 7 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion.

The following table presents information for investments in securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2007,2009, based on scheduled maturities. Actual maturities can be expected to differ from scheduled maturities due to prepayment or early call options of the issuer.

    
 Available-for-Sale Available-for-Sale
 Amortized Cost Estimated Fair Value Amortized
Cost		 Estimated
Fair Value
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Due in one year or less $13,041  $13,032  $1,852  $1,857 
Due after one year through five years  34,301   34,196   7,103   6,232 
Due after five years through ten years  108,416   107,987   52,655   51,350 
Due after ten years  158,422   151,160   244,528   233,153 
Equity securities  7,973   7,819   5,936   5,532 
Total $322,153  $314,194 
Total investment securities $312,074  $298,124 

During 2007,2009, securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio amounted to approximately $56.3$665.8 million. The gross realized gains on securities sold amounted to approximately $578,000,$5,897,000, while the gross realized losses amounted to approximately $266,000$1,168,000 in 2007. Calls and sales from2009. During 2009, the Corporation’s held-to-maturity portfolio resulted inCorporation recorded a gain of $588,000 and$140,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge on its Lehman Brothers corporate bond, $3,433,000 on two pooled trust preferred securities, $188,000 on three variable rate private label CMOs, $364,000 on charge to earnings relating to the securities which had been sold from the held-to-maturity portfolio were sold in anticipation of imminent callscourt ordered liquidation of the securities permissibleReserve Primary Fund, and $113,000 of write-downs relating to one equity holding in accordance with SFAS No. 115. Securitiesbank stocks. During 2008, securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio during 2006 amounted to $188.0 million withapproximately $330.8 million. The gross realized gains of $1.7 million andon securities sold amounted to approximately $818,000, while the gross realized losses of $4.3 million. Call and sales from the Corporation’s held-to-maturity portfolio in 2006 resulted in a gain of $95,000 and the securities which had been sold from the held-to-maturity portfolio were sold in anticipation of imminent calls of the securities permissible in accordance with SFAS No. 115. Securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio during 2005 amounted to $59.4 million with gross realized gains of $672,702 and gross realized losses of $322,508.

As part of a restructuringapproximately $163,000 in 2006,2008. During 2008, the Corporation sold $86.3incurred a $1.3 million charge relating to a Lehman Brothers corporate bond and $461,000 of available-for-sale securities, which were yielding less than 4 percent. The sale resultedwrite-downs relating to three equity holdings in an after-tax charge of approximately $2.4 million, which resulted in the Corporation’s recording a loss for the first quarter of 2006. The proceeds from the sale of securities were utilized to reduce the Corporation’s short-term borrowings and wholesale funding sources by $85.0 million. As a result of this deleveraging, short-term borrowings were reduced to $98.5 million at March 23, 2006. Of this remaining amount, approximately $41 million of short-term borrowings constitute commercial sweep accounts and were considered core deposits of the Bank.

Temporarily Impaired Investments

Investments whose value is considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value as a charge to realized losses. The cost basis of these written down investments is adjusted to fair value at the date the determination of impairment is made. The new cost basis is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in value. At December 31, 2007, there were no securities that reflected other-than-temporary impairment and no such write-downs occurred during 2007. The Corporation does not believe that the unrealized losses, which comprised of 173 investment securities, as of December 31, 2007, represent an other than temporary impairment. The gross unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and Agency securities and Federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other taxable securities and tax-exempt securities are not considered to be other-than-temporary because their unrealized losses are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer. The Corporation has the intent and ability to hold the investment securities for a period of time necessary to recover the amortized cost.bank stocks.

F-24


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 74 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

Other-than-Temporarily Impaired Investments

Summary of Other-than-Temporary Impairment Charges

  
 Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Equity securities $113  $461 
Debt securities  4,125   1,300 
Total other-than-temporary impairment charges $4,238  $1,761 

The Corporation performs regular analysis on the available-for-sale securities portfolio to determine whether a decline in fair value indicates that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired in accordance with FASB ASC 320-10. FASB ASC 320-10 requires companies to record other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges, through earnings, if they have the intent to sell, or more likely than not be required to sell, an impaired debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the Corporation intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss, the OTTI is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its estimated fair value at the balance sheet date. If the Corporation does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, and as such, it determines that a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the OTTI is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

The Corporation reviews all securities for potential recognition of other-than-temporary impairment. The Corporation maintains a watch list for the identification and monitoring of securities experiencing problems that requiredrequire a heightened level of review. This could include credit rating downgrades.

The Corporation’s assessment of whether an investment in the portfolio of assets is other-than-temporaryother than temporary includes factors such as whether the issuer has defaulted on scheduled payments, announced restructuring and/or filed for bankruptcy, has disclosed severe liquidity problems that cannot be resolved, disclosed deteriorating financial condition or sustained significant losses.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

The following table presents detailed information for each trust preferred security held by the Corporation which has at least one rating below investment grade.

         
         
Deal Name Single
Issuer
or
Pooled		 Class/
Tranche		 Book
Value		 Estimated
Fair
Value		 Gross
Unrealized
Gain
(Loss)		 Lowest
Credit
Rating
Assigned		 Number of
Banks
Currently
Performing		 Deferrals
and
Defaults
as % of
Original
Collateral		 Expected
Deferral/Defaults
as % of
Remaining
Performing
Collateral
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Countrywide Capital IV  Single   —  $1,769  $1,519  $(250)   BB   1   None   None 
Countrywide Capital V  Single   —   2,747   2,366   (381)   BB   1   None   None 
Countrywide Capital V  Single   —   250   215   (35)   BB   1   None   None 
NPB Capital Trust II  Single   —   898   754   (144)   NR   1   None   None 
Citigroup Cap IX  Single   —   991   736   (255)   B+   1   None   None 
Citigroup Cap IX  Single   —   1,901   1,420   (481)   B+   1   None   None 
Citigroup Cap XI  Single   —   245   184   (61)   B+   1   None   None 
IBC Cap Fin II  Single   —   667   333   (334)   NR   1   None   None 
BFC Capital Trust  Single   —   1,348   1,461   113   NR   1   None   None 
BAC Capital Trust X  Single   —   2,496   2,004   (492)   BB   1   None   None 
Nationsbank Cap Trust III  Single   —   1,568   1,095   (473)   BB   1   None   None 
Bank of Florida Junior Sub Debt  Single   —   3,000   2,100   (900)   NR   1   None   None 
ALESCO Preferred Funding VI  Pooled   C2   665   34   (631)   Ca   68   31.4%   62.4% 
ALESCO Preferred Funding VII  Pooled   C1   2,041   215   (1,826)   Ca   69   22.9%   53.2% 

At December 31, 2009, excess subordination as a percentage of remaining performing collateral for the ALESCO Preferred Funding VI and VII investments were -31.1 percent and -21.0 percent, respectively. Excess subordination is the amount of performing collateral above the amount of outstanding collateral underlying each class of the security. The Excess Subordination as a Percent of Remaining Performing Collateral reflects the difference between the performing collateral and the collateral underlying each security divided by the performing collateral. A negative number results when the paying collateral is less than the collateral underlying each class of the security. A low or negative number decreases the likelihood of full repayment of principal and interest accordingly to original contractual terms.

The Corporation owns two pooled trust preferred securities (“Pooled TRUPS”), which consists of securities issued by financial institutions and insurances companies and the Corporation holds the mezzanine tranche of such securities. Senior tranches generally are protected from defaults by over-collateralization and cash flow default protection provided by subordinated tranches, with senior tranches having the greatest protection and mezzanine tranches subordinated to the senior tranches. Our analysis of these Pooled TRUPS falls within the scope of EITF 99-20 and uses a discounted cash flow model to determine the total OTTI loss. The model


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

considers the structure and term and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers and the allocation of the payments to the note classes according to a priority of payments specified in the offering circular and indenture. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include defaults rates, default rate timing profile and recovery rates. We assume no prepayments as these Pooled TRUPS were issued at comparatively tight spreads and as such, there is little incentive if any to prepay.

One of the Pooled TRUPS has incurred its third interruption of cash flow payments to date. Management reviewed the expected cash flow analysis and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid, and recorded a $1.060 million other-than-temporary impairment charge for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and $2.460 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, which represents 79.7 percent of the par amount of $3.1 million. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $665,000. The other Pooled TRUP incurred its first interruption of cash flow payment in the fourth quarter of 2009. Management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment exists on this security as well and recorded a $973,000 charge during the fourth quarter of 2009, which represents 32.3 percent of the par amount of $3.0 million. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $2.0 million.

During the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $140,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge on its Lehman Brothers bond holding. Through June 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment charges taken on this bond amounted to $1,440,000. As part of the Corporation’s tax strategies, management elected to sell the Lehman bond holding during the third quarter of 2009.

Credit Loss Portion of OTTI Recognized in Earning on Debt Securities

 
 (Dollars in Thousands)
Balance of credit-related OTTI at January 1, 2009 $— 
Addition:
     
Credit losses for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized  3,761 
Reduction:
     
Credit losses for securities sold during the period  (140) 
Balance of credit-related OTTI at December 31, 2009 $3,621 

The Corporation owns three variable rate private label collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), which were also evaluated for impairment. The Variable Rate Collateralized Mortgage Obligations were originally issued in 2006 and are 30 year Adjustable Rate Mortgage loans secured by a first lien, fully amortizing one-to-four residential mortgage loans. The tranche purchased was a Super Senior with an original credit rating of AAA/AAA. The top five states geographic concentration comprised in the deal were California 18.2 percent, Arizona 10.5 percent, Virginia 6.1 percent, Florida 6.5 percent and Nevada 6.3 percent. No one state exceeded a 25 percent concentration. These states have been heavily impacted by the financial crises and as such have sustained heavy delinquencies affecting the credit rating of the security. Management had applied aggressive default rates to identify if any credit impairment exists, as these bonds were downgraded to below investment grade. These bonds are currently paying with no interruption of cash flow. As such, management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment charge exists and recorded a $188,000 writedown to the bonds, which represents 3.4 percent of the par amount of $5.6 million. The new cost basis for these securities has been written down to $5.4 million.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

During 2009, the Corporation recorded $113,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to one equity holding in bank stocks. Due to the deterioration in the bank’s financial condition and that near term prospects in market value recovery appear remote, management determined that the expectation to recover its cost is not temporary. As such, this equity was written down to fair market value at the time of evaluation, which was December 31, 2009.

The Corporation’s investment portfolio also consists of overnight investments that were made into the Reserve Primary Fund (the “Fund”), a money market fund registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. On September 22, 2008, the Fund announced that redemptions of shares of the Fund were suspended pursuant to an SEC order so that an orderly liquidation could be effected for the protection of the Fund’s investors. Through December 31, 2009, the Corporation has received five distributions from the Fund, totaling approximately 92 percent of its outstanding balance, leaving a remaining outstanding balance in the Fund of $2.943 million. On January 29, 2010, as part of the court order liquidation of the Fund, the Corporation received a sixth distribution or $2.446 million, bringing total distributions to date to approximately 99 percent. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $364,000, or approximately 1 percent, other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings relating to this court order liquidation of the Fund. The Corporation’s outstanding carrying balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2010 totaled $133,000.

During the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation recognized a $1.2 million other-than-temporary impairment charge on a Lehman Brothers corporate bond as a result of Lehman Brothers’ September bankruptcy filing. The Corporation deemed it prudent to mark the security down to what the Corporation believes it would receive from the bankruptcy proceedings as opposed to an attempted sale into an illiquid market. During the fourth quarter, the Corporation took an additional impairment charge of $100,000 on the same bond. The Corporation filed its claims under the Bankruptcy and received notification that Lehman will be afforded a longer time for liquidation than originally announced in order to maximize value returns on the sold assets. Management will continue to monitor the liquidation process, re-test values during that period and adjust carrying value if necessary.

During 2008, the Corporation recorded $461,000 of other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to three equity holdings in bank stocks. These equities were written down to fair value.

Temporarily Impaired Investments

For all other securities, the Corporation does not believe that the unrealized losses, which were comprised of eighty investment securities as of December 31, 2009, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. The gross unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and Agency securities and Federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and tax-exempt securities are not considered to be other than temporary because their unrealized losses are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer.

Factors affecting the market price include credit risk, market risk, interest rates, economic cycles, and liquidity risk. The magnitude of any unrealized loss may be affected by the relative concentration of the Corporation’s investmentsinvestment in any one issuer or industry. The Corporation has established policies to reduce exposure through diversification of concentration of the investment portfolio including limits on concentrations to any one issuer. The Corporation believes the investment portfolio is prudently diversified.

The decline in value is related to a change in interest rates and subsequent change in credit spreads required for these issues affecting market price. All issues are performing and are expected to continue to perform in accordance with their respective contractual terms and conditions. Short to intermediate average durations and in certain cases monthly principal payments should reduce further market value exposure to increases in rates.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 — Investment Securities ��– (continued)

The Corporation evaluates all securities with unrealized losses quarterly to determine whether the loss is other than temporary. Unrealized losses in the mortgage-backed securities category consist primarily of U.S. agency and private issue collateralized mortgage obligations. Unrealized losses in the corporate debt securities category consist of single name corporate trust preferred securities, pooled trust preferred securities and corporate debt securities issued by large financial institutions. The decline in fair value is due in large part to the lack of an active trading market for these securities, changes in market credit spreads and rating agency downgrades. For collateralized mortgage obligations, management reviewed expected cash flows and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid. None of the corporate issuers have defaulted on interest payments. Management concluded that these securities, other than the previously mentioned two Pooled TRUPS, two private label CMOs, one equity holding and its investment in the Primary Reserve Funds, were not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009. Future deterioration in the cash flow on collateralized mortgage obligations or the credit quality of these large financial institution issuers of corporate debt securities could result in impairment charges in the future.

In determining that the securities giving rise to the previously mentioned unrealized losses were not other than temporary, the Corporation evaluated the factors cited above, which the Corporation considers when assessing whether a security is other than temporarilyother-than-temporarily impaired. In making these evaluations the Corporation must exercise considerable judgment. Accordingly there can be no assurance that the actual results will not differ from the Corporation’s judgments and that such differences may not require the future recognition of other-than-temporary impairment charges that could have a material affect on the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations. In addition, the value of, and the realization of any loss on, an investment security is subject to numerous risks as cited above.

The following tables indicatesindicate gross unrealized losses not recognized in income and fair value, aggregated by investment category and the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 20072009 and 2006:December 31, 2008:

      
      
 December 31, 2007
   Total Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer
   Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-Sale:
                              
U.S. agency obligations and direct
obligations of US government		 $11,832  $(137)  $—  $—  $11,832  $(137) 
Federal agency CMO’s  59,210   (1,052)   —   —   59,210   (1,052) 
Federal agency MBS’s  5,655   (37)   65        5,590   (37) 
Corporate bonds  91,596   (7,137)   52,161   (6,392)   39,435   (745) 
Municipal tax exempt obligations  31,377   (337)   9,002   (88)   22,375   (249) 
Equity securities  1,370   (616)   1,370   (616)   —   — 
Total temporarily impaired securities $201,040  $(9,316)  $62,598  $(7,096)  $138,442  $(2,220) 
      
 December 31, 2009
   Total Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer
   Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses		 Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses		 Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-Sale:
                              
Federal Agency Obligations $120,504  $(2,647)  $120,402  $(2,646)  $102  $(1) 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  7,181   (484)   6,297   (458)   884   (26) 
Trust preferred securities  25,253   (7,802)   3,717   (1,234)   21,536   (6,568) 
Other debt securities  22,815   (3,472)   11,864   (55)   10,951   (3,417) 
Equity securities  1,317   (445)   —   —   1,317   (445) 
Total temporarily impaired securities $177,070  $(14,850)  $142,280  $(4,393)  $34,790  $(10,457) 

F-25


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 74 — Investment Securities  – (continued)

      
 December 31, 2006
   Total Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer
   Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Held-to-Maturity
                              
U.S. Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of US government		 $15,223  $(375)  $—  $—  $15,223  $(375) 
Federal agency CMO’s  29,993   (770)   6,959   (4)   23,034   (766) 
Federal agency MBS’s  539   (2)   539   (2)   —   — 
Corporate bonds  5,899   (135)   —   —   5,899   (135) 
Municipal tax exempt obligations  23,627   (347)   4,231   (16)   19,396   (331) 
Equity securities  —   —   —   —   —   — 
Total temporarily impaired securities $75,281  $(1,629)  $11,729  $(22)  $63,552  $(1,607) 

      
      
 December 31, 2006
   Total Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer
   Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-Sale
 
U.S. Treasury obligations and direct
obligations of US government		 $8,863  $(406)  $100  $—  $8,763  $(406) 
Federal agency CMO’s  101,331   (3,512)   1,751   (40)   99,580   (3,472) 
Federal agency MBS’s  15,578   (505)   —   —   15,578   (505) 
Corporate bonds  12,081   (187)   7,137   (74)   4,944   (113) 
Municipal tax exempt obligations  23,019   (578)   2,565   (4)   20,454   (574) 
Equity securities  —   —   —   —   —   — 
Total temporarily impaired securities $160,872  $(5,188)  $11,553  $(118)  $149,319  $(5,070) 
      
 December 31, 2008
   Total Less than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer
   Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses		 Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses		 Fair
Value		 Unrealized
Losses
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Available-for-Sale:
                              
Federal Agency Obligations $16,118  $(209)  $2,477  $(1)  $13,641  $(208) 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  9,542   (268)   8,740   (155)   802   (113) 
Trust preferred securities  28,103   (7,279)   1,485   (16)   26,618   (7,263) 
Other debt securities  48,208   (3,824)   16,358   (1,540)   31,850   (2,284) 
Equity securities  500   (657)   —   —   500   (657) 
Total temporarily impaired securities $102,471  $(12,237)  $29,060  $(1,712)  $73,411  $(10,525) 

Investment securities having a carrying value of approximately $175.4$185.9 million and $179.5$149.8 million at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, short-term borrowings, and FHLB advances and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

Note 85 — Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table sets forth the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, net of deferred fees and costs, at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively:

    
 2007 2006 2009 2008
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Real estate – residential mortgage $266,251  $269,486  $191,199  $240,885 
Real estate – commercial  219,356   206,044   405,903   358,394 
Commercial and industrial  65,493   74,179   117,912   75,415 
Installment  569   705   439   1,509 
Total $551,669  $550,414 
Total loans $715,453  $676,203 

Included in the loan balances above are net deferred loan costs of $579,000$391,000 and $494,000$572,000 at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively.

F-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 8 — Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses  – (continued)

At December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, loans to officers and directors aggregated approximately $2,083,000$9,006,000 and $5,065,000,$3,893,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation made new loans to officers and directors in the amount of $1,355,000;$6,075,000; payments by such persons during 20072009 aggregated $4,337,000.$962,000.

Management is of the opinion that the above loans were made on the same terms and conditions as those prevailing for comparable transactions with non-related borrowers.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5 — Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses  – (continued)

A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

   
 2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at the beginning of year $4,960  $4,937  $3,781 
Provision for loan losses  350   57   — 
Addition of Red Oak Bank’s Allowance – May 20, 2005  —   —   1,210 
Loans charged-off  (156)   (79)   (82) 
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off  9   45   28 
Balance at the end of year $5,163  $4,960  $4,937 

Total non-performing assets are comprised of the outstanding balances of accruing loans, which are 90 days, or more past due as to principal or interest payments, non-accrual loans and other real estate owned. Total non-performing assets at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

   
 2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Loans past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing $—  $225  $179 
Non-accrual loans  3,907   475   387 
Other real estate owned  501   —   — 
Total non-performing assets $4,408  $700  $566 
   
 2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at the beginning of year $6,254  $5,163  $4,960 
Provision for loan losses  3,261   1,561   350 
Loans charged-off  (2,152)   (499)   (156) 
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off  912   29   9 
Balance at the end of year $8,275  $6,254  $5,163 

The amount of interest income that would have been recorded on non-accrual loans in 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 had payments remained in accordance with the original contractual terms was $160,000, $28,000$276,000, $37,000 and $29,000,$160,000, respectively.

At December 31, 2007,2009, total impaired loans were approximately $3,827,000$8,058,000 as compared to $470,000 and $300,000$634,000 at December 31, 20062008. The amount of related valuation allowances was $662,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2005, respectively. The reserves allocatednone at December 31, 2008. Impaired loans with a specific reserve of $662,000 amounted to such$3,639,000 while $4,419,000 of impaired loans in 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $0, $0, and $44,000, respectively.had no specific reserves. The Corporation’s total average impaired loans were $6,249,000 during 2009, $525,000 during 2008, and $1,548,000 during 2007, $189,000 during 2006, and $197,000 during 2005.2007.

At December 31, 2007,2009, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were non-accrual or contractually past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing interest.

The policy of the Corporation is to generally grant commercial, mortgage and installment loans to New Jersey residents and businesses within its tradingmarket area. The borrowers’ abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors including the borrowers’ income and net worth, cash flows generated by the borrowers’ underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral, and priority of the Bank’s lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the control of the Corporation. The Corporation is therefore subject to risk of loss. The Corporation believes its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent risks. Collateral and/or personal guarantees are required for virtually all loans.

F-27During the fourth quarter of 2009 the Corporation took steps to terminate a participation agreement with another New Jersey bank, as the participation ended on December 31, 2009. Accordingly the Corporation reclassified the outstanding loan of $5.1 million into other assets on its balance sheet.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 96 — Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:

      
 Estimated Useful Life (Years) 2007 2006 Estimated
Useful Life
(Years)		 2009 2008
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Land      $3,447  $3,447       $3,447  $3,447 
Buildings  5 – 40   13,981   14,208   5 – 40   16,200   16,182 
Furniture, fixtures and equipment  2 – 20   15,718   15,406   2 – 20   16,222   15,933 
Leasehold improvements  5 – 30   2,177   2,130   5 – 30   1,839   1,735 
Subtotal       35,323   35,191        37,708   37,297 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     17,904   16,362 
Total    $17,419  $18,829 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization     19,848   18,809 
Total premises and equipment, net    $17,860  $18,488 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 6 — Premises and Equipment  – (continued)

Depreciation and amortization expense of premises and equipment for the three years ended December 31, 20072009 amounted to $1,369,000 in 2009, $1,738,000 in 2008 and $1,592,000 in 2007, $1,732,000 in 2006 and $1,752,000 in 2005, respectively.

Note 107 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill allocated to the Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $16,804,000. There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

The table below provides information regarding the carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of amortized intangible assets as of the noted periods ended.

   
 Gross
Carrying
Amount		 Accumulated
Amortization		 Net
Carrying
Amount
   (Dollars in Thousands)
As of December 31, 2009:
               
Core deposits $703  $(479)  $224 
Total intangible assets  703   (479)   224 
As of December 31, 2008:
               
Core deposits $703  $(397)  $306 
Total intangible assets  703   (397)   306 
As of December 31, 2007:
               
Core deposits $703  $(303)  $400 
Total intangible assets $703  $(303)  $400 

The current year and estimated future amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was $82,000 for 2009 and $69,000, $56,000, $44,000, $31,000 and $18,000, respectively, for the subsequent five-year periods of 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.

Note 8 — Deposits

The table below provides information regarding the aggregate amount and maturity of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2009.

 
 Amount
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Due in one year or less $141,827 
Due in 2011  2,119 
Due in 2012  753 
Due in 2013  103 
Total certificates of deposit $100 or more $144,802 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9 — Borrowed Funds

Short-term borrowings at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 consisted of the following:

  
 2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase $48,541  $29,443 
Federal Home Loan Bank short-term and overnight advances  1,123   2,000 
Total Short-Term Borrowings $49,664  $31,443 
  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase $46,109  $30,143 
Federal funds purchased and FHLB short-term advances  —   15,000 
Total short-term borrowings $46,109  $45,143 

The weighted average interest rate for short-term borrowings at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 was 3.601.38 percent and 3.461.51 percent, respectively.

Long-term borrowings at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 consisted of the following:

  
 2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances $125,445  $106,991 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  43,000   68,000 
Total Long-Term Borrowings $168,445  $174,991 
  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
FHLB long-term advances $170,144  $170,297 
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase  53,000   53,000 
Total long-term borrowings $223,144  $223,297 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase had average balances of $88.0$87.9 million and $96.4$94.9 million for the years ended December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding at any month end during 20072009 and 20062008 was $107.3$111.5 million and $103.4$106.0 million, respectively. The average interest rate paid on securities sold under agreements to repurchase were 4.233.52 percent and 3.783.70 percent for the years ended December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively. Overnight federal funds purchased averaged $12.9$0.5 million during 20072009 as compared to $12.7$14.1 million during 2006.2008.

The weighted average interest rates on long term borrowings at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 were 4.454.36 percent and 4.614.34 percent, respectively. The maximum amount outstanding at any month endmonth-end during 20072009 and 20062008 was $179.7$223.3 million and $206.9$223.3 million, respectively. The average interest rates paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances were 4.784.09 percent and 4.634.18 percent for the years ended December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively.

F-28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 10 — Borrowed Funds  – (continued)

At December 31, 20072009 and 2006, the2008, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) amounted to $126.6$170.1 million and $109.0$170.3 million, respectively. The FHLB advances had a weighted average interest rate of 4.424.09 percent and 4.654.09 percent at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, respectively. These advances are secured by pledges of FHLB stock, 1 – 1–4 family residential mortgages, commercial real estate mortgages and U.S. Government and Federal Agency obligations. The advances are subject to quarterly call provisions at the discretion of the FHLB and at December 31, 20072009 and 2006,2008, are contractually scheduled for repayment as follows:

    
 2007 2006 2009 2008
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
2007 $—  $2,000 
2008  1,124   1,422 
2009  —   — 
2010  40,444   50,569  $40,144  $40,297 
2011  10,000   10,000   10,000   10,000 
2012  —   5,000 
2013  —   —   5,000   5,000 
2014  —   — 
2015  —   20,000 
2016  20,000   20,000   20,000   20,000 
2017  55,000   —   55,000   55,000 
2018  40,000   40,000 
Total $126,568  $108,991  $170,144  $170,297 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 9 — Borrowed Funds  – (continued)

The securities sold under repurchase agreements to other counterparties included in long-term debt totaled $43.0$53.0 million at December 31, 20072009 and $68.0$53.0 million at December 31, 2006.2008. The weighted average rate at December 31, 20072009 and 20062008 was 4.545.23 percent and 4.514.54 percent, respectively. The schedule for contractual repayment is as follows:

  
 2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
2008 $—  $— 
2011  12,000   27,000 
2013  16,000   41,000 
2017  15,000   ��� 
Total: $43,000  $68,000 
  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
2011 $12,000  $12,000 
2015  10,000   10,000 
2017  15,000   15,000 
2018  16,000   16,000 
Total $53,000  $53,000 

Note 10 — Subordinated Debentures

During 2003, the Corporation formed a statutory business trust, which exists for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing Trust Securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trust is not consolidated in accordance with FASB ASC 810-10 (previously FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”). Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts below have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the mandatory redeemable trust preferred securities of the Corporation’s Statutory Trust II at December 31, 2009.

     
Issuance Date Securities
Issued		 Liquidation
Value		 Coupon Rate Maturity Redeemable by
Issuer Beginning
12/19/03 $5,000,000  $1,000 per
Capital Security		   Floating 3-month
LIBOR + 285
Basis Points		   01/23/2034   01/23/2009 

Note 11 — Income Taxes

The current and deferred amounts of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are as follows:

   
 2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Current:
               
Federal $(19)  $104  $1,693 
State  146   242   313 
Subtotal  127   346   2,006 
Deferred:
               
Federal  1,238   1,184   (3,731) 
State  115   37   (1,208) 
Subtotal  1,353   1,221   (4,939) 
Income tax expense (benefit) $1,480  $1,567  $(2,933) 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11 — Income Taxes  – (continued)

During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Corporation effected an internal entity structure reorganization of its subsidiary companies to streamline and consolidate the various subsidiary companies. We simplified our structure by reducing the number of operating subsidiary entities. Plans of liquidation were adopted and affected for 2006 and this resulted in a $2.6 million federal tax benefit of which $1.4 million is reflected in the 2006 current net tax benefit. The liquidation was completed in November of 2007 and as a result for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation recognized an additional $2.4 million federal tax benefit of which $1.3 million is reflected in the 2007 current net tax benefit.

Reconciliation between the amount of reported income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate is as follows:

   
 2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Income before income tax expense $6,053  $7,409  $923 
Federal statutory rate  34%   34%   34% 
Computed “expected” Federal income tax expense  2,058   2,519   314 
State tax, net of Federal tax benefit  173   184   (591) 
Bank owned life insurance  (393)   (409)   (313) 
Tax-exempt interest and dividends  (334)   (798)   (1,080) 
Internal entity reorganization of subsidiaries  —   —   (1,285) 
Other, net  (24)   71   22 
Income tax expense (benefit) $1,480  $1,567  $(2,933) 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:

  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
          
Impaired assets $1,661  $676 
Allowance for loan losses  3,121   2,314 
Employee benefit plans  54   165 
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale and tax benefits related to adoption of FASB ASC 715-10 (previously known as FASB No 158)  7,088   5,800 
Other  507   406 
Federal NOL and AMT Credits  4,471   7,426 
NJ NOL and AMA credits  1,813   2,152 
Total deferred tax assets $18,715  $18,939 
Deferred tax liabilities:
          
Depreciation $243  $235 
Market discount accretion  61   108 
Deferred loan costs, net of fees  502   581 
Purchase accounting  89   130 
Total deferred tax liabilities  895   1,054 
Net deferred tax asset $17,820  $17,885 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11 — Income Taxes  – (continued)

Based on the Corporation’s historical and current taxable income and the projected future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not that the Corporation will realize the benefit of the net deductible temporary differences existing at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation has federal income tax loss carry forwards of approximately $7.1 million, which have expirations beginning in the year 2020 and has state income tax loss carry forwards of approximately $26.9 million, which have expirations beginning in the year 2011.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependant upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible, Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. During 2009 and 2008, based on the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, the Corporation believes the net deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.

The Corporation’s federal income tax returns are open and subject to examination from the 2006 tax return year and forward. The Corporation’s state income tax returns are generally open from the 2006 and later tax return years based on individual state statute of limitations.

Note 12 — Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations of Credit Risk

In the normal course of business, the Corporation has outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as standby and commercial letters of credit, unused portions of lines of credit and commitments to extend various types of credit. Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit generally do not exceed one year.

These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The commitment or contract amount of these financial instruments is an indicator of the Corporation’s level of involvement in each type of instrument as well as the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument.

The Corporation controls the credit risk of these financial instruments through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To minimize potential credit risk, the Corporation generally requires collateral and other credit-related terms and conditions from the customer. In the opinion of management, the financial condition of the Corporation will not be materially affected by the final outcome of these commitments and contingent liabilities.

A substantial portion of the Bank’s loans is secured by real estate located in New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio of the Bank is susceptible to changes in the real estate market.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 12 — Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations of Credit Risk  – (continued)

The following table provides a summary of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Commitments under commercial loans and lines of credit $70,076  $71,271 
Home equity and other revolving lines of credit  54,572   61,886 
Outstanding commercial mortgage loan commitments  33,659   31,831 
Standby letters of credit  1,676   2,357 
Performance letters of credit  11,466   13,745 
Outstanding residential mortgage loan commitments  4,153   1,588 
Overdraft protection lines  5,058   4,480 
Other consumer  11   36 
Total $180,671  $187,194 

Other expenses include rentals for premises and equipment of $704,000 in 2009, $1,092,000 in 2008 and $1,004,000 in 2007. At December 31, 2006, the Corporation was obligated under a number of non-cancelable leases for premises and equipment, many of which provide for increased rentals based upon increases in real estate taxes and the cost of living index. These leases, most of which have renewal provisions, are principally operating leases. Minimum rentals under the terms of these leases for the years 2010 through 2014 are $592,000, $607,000, $625,000, $500,000 and $533,000, respectively. Minimum rentals due 2015 and after are $4,857,000.

The Corporation is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business. Based upon the information currently available in connection with such claims, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Corporation.

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity, Regulatory Requirements and Subsequent Event

On January 12, 2009, the Corporation issued $10 million in nonvoting senior preferred stock to the U.S. Department of Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program. As part of the transaction, the Corporation also issued warrants to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 173,410 shares of common stock of the Corporation at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. As previously announced, the Corporation’s voluntary participation in the Capital Purchase Program amounted to approximately 50 percent of what the Corporation had qualified for under the U.S. Treasury program. The Corporation believes that its participation in this program will strengthen its current well-capitalized position. The funding will be used to support future loan growth. As a result of the successful completion of the rights offering in October 2009, the number of shares underlying the warrants held by the U.S. Treasury was reduced to 86,705 shares, or 50 percent of the original 173,410 shares as outlined by the provisions of the Capital Purchase Program.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“FRB”) regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2009, the Bank was required to maintain (i) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier I capital to total adjusted assets of 4.00 percent, and (ii) minimum ratios of Tier I and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.00 percent and 8.00 percent, respectively.

Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the regulators are required to take certain supervisory actions with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution’s financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of financial


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity, Regulatory Requirements and Subsequent Event  – (continued)

institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage (Tier I) capital ratio of at least 5.00 percent; a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.00 percent; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00 percent.

The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about capital components, risk weightings and other factors. The Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) has established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank effective as of December 31, 2009: Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital of 10.0 percent, Total Risk-Based Capital of 12.0 percent and Tier 1 Leverage Capital of 8.0 percent. Similar categories apply to bank holding companies. At December 31, 2009, the Bank’s capital ratios were all above the minimum levels required, other than the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio, which was slightly below the 8.0 percent established by the OCC for the Bank.

At December 31, 2009, management believes that the Bank and the Parent Corporation met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject, other than the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio, which was slightly below the 8.0 percent established by the OCC for the Bank.

The following is a summary of the Bank’s and the Parent Corporation’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, compared to the FRB and FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FRB and FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.

      
 Union Center
National
Bank Actual		 Minimum Capital
Adequacy		 For Classification
Under Corrective
Action Plan
as Well Capitalized
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
   (Dollars in Thousands)
December 31, 2009 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $97,116   7.62%  $52,131   4.00%  $64,313   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1 $97,116   11.25%  $34,521   4.00%  $51,781   6.00% 
Total  105,402   12.21%   69,042   8.00%   86,302   10.00% 
December 31, 2008 Leverage (Tier 1) capital  76,598   7.54%   41,655   4.00%   51,214   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1 $76,598   9.99%  $30,672   4.00%  $46,008   6.00% 
Total  82,852   10.80%   61,344   8.00%   76,680   10.00% 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity, Regulatory Requirements and Subsequent Event  – (continued)

      
 Parent Corporation
Actual		 Minimum Capital
Adequacy		 For Classification
as Well Capitalized
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
   (Dollars in Thousands)
December 31, 2009 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $99,338   7.80%  $52,141   4.00%  $64,325   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1 $99,338   11.51%  $34,534   4.00%  $51,801   6.00% 
Total  107,613   12.46%   69,067   8.00%   N/A   N/A 
December 31, 2008 Leverage (Tier 1) capital  78,237   7.71%   41,619   4.00%   51,618   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1 $78,237   10.20%  $30,675   4.00%  $46,013   6.00% 
Total  84,491   11.02%   61,350   8.00%   N/A   N/A 

The Corporation issued $5.2 million of subordinated debentures in 2003. These securities are included as a component of Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes.

On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule that allows the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in the Tier I Capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter quantitative limits and qualitative standards. The new quantitative limits became effective after a five-year transition period ending March 31, 2009. Under the final rules, trust preferred securities and other restricted core capital elements are limited to 25% of all core capital elements. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of these limits may be included in Tier II Capital. Based on a review of the final rule, the Corporation believes that its trust preferred issues qualify as Tier I Capital. However, in the event that the trust preferred issues do not qualify as Tier I Capital, the Corporation would remain well-capitalized.

Note 14 — Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Corporation’s other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of unrealized holding gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, obligations for defined benefit pension plan and an adjustment to reflect the curtailment of the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan, net of taxes.

Disclosure of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity. The table below provides a reconciliation of the components of other comprehensive income to the disclosure provided in the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 14 — Comprehensive Income  – (continued)

The components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes, were as follows for the following fiscal years ended December 31:

   
 Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Unrealized losses on debt securities for which a portion of the impairment has been recognized in income $(1,830)  $—  $— 
Reclassification adjustments of OTTI losses included in income  (4,238)   —   — 
Unrealized losses on other available for sale securities  (1,979)   (3,328)   (4,079) 
Reclassification adjustment for net gain/(loss) arising during this period  4,729   655   312 
Net unrealized losses  (3,318)   (2,673)   (3,767) 
Tax effect  1,354   1,584   1,163 
Net of tax amount  (1,964)   (1,089)   (2,604) 
Change in minimum pension liability  25   —   — 
Tax effect  (10)   —   — 
Net of tax amount  15   —   — 
Net actuarial gains (losses)  142   (3,332)   (583) 
Tax effect  (57)   1,333   233 
Net of tax amount  85   (1,999)   (350) 
Change in pension plan – curtailment  —   —   1,353 
Tax effect  —   —   (541) 
Net of tax amount  —   —   812 
Market value adjustment on securities transferred from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale  —   —   (459) 
Tax effect  —   —   187 
Net of tax amount  —   —   (272) 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax $(1,864)  $(3,088)  $(2,414) 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:

  
 2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Investment securities available for sale, net of tax $(8,428)  $(6,464) 
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans, net of tax  (2,348)   (2,448) 
Total $(10,776)  $(8,912) 

Note 15 — Pension and Other Benefits

Defined Benefit Plans

The Corporation maintainsmaintained a non-contributory pension plan for substantially all of its employees.employees until September 30, 2007, at which time the Corporation froze its defined benefit pension plan. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation over the prior five-year period. The plan’s benefits are payable in form of a ten year certain and life annuity. The plan is intended to be a tax-qualified defined benefit plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Pension Plan, which has been in effect since March 15, 1950, generally covers employees of Union Center National Bank and the Parent Corporation


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

who have attained age 21 and completed one year of service. The normal retirement (age 65) pension payablePayments may be made under the Pension Plan once attaining the normal retirement age of 65 and is generally equal to 44%44 percent of a participant’s highest average compensation over a 5-year period.

In addition, the Corporation has a non-qualified retirement plan that is designed to supplement the pension plan for key employees. The plan is known as the Union Center National Bank Benefit Equalization

F-29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

Plan, or “BEP”. The BEP is a nonqualified, unfunded supplemental retirement plan, which is designed to replace the benefits that cannot be provided under the terms of the Pension Plan solely due to certain compensation and benefit limits placed on tax-qualified pension plans under the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits under the BEP Plan were paid out in 2009.

On August 9, 2007, the CompanyCorporation froze its defined benefit pension plan and redesigned its 401(k) savings plan, effective September 30, 2007. The changes are consistent with ongoing cost reduction strategies and shift the focus of future savings of retirement benefits toward the more predictable cost structure of a 401(k) plan and away from the legacy costs of a defined benefit pension plan. The changes included a discontinuation of the accrual of future benefits in the Corporation’s defined benefit pension plan and fully preserving all retirement benefits that employees will have earned as of September 30, 2007, and the redesigning of the Corporation’s 401(k) plan to provide a dollar-for-dollar matching contribution up to six percent of salary deferrals. The Corporation also froze all other defined benefit plans. As a result, the Corporation recorded a one-time pre-tax benefit related to these pension plan changes of approximately $1.2 million in 2007 as a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan.

In 1999, the Corporation adopted a Director’s Retirement Plan, which is designed to provide retirement benefits for members of the Board of Directors. TheThere was no recorded expense associated with the plan amountedin 2009, 2008 and 2007. During the third quarter of 2008, the Corporation recognized a $272,000 benefit relating to none in 2007, $79,000 in 2006a lump-sum payment and $76,000 for 2005,termination of the Directors Retirement Plan. This benefit represented the difference between the actuarial present value of the lump-sum payments and is included in other expense.the accrued liability previously recorded on the Corporation’s balance sheet.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

The following table sets forth changes in projected benefit obligation, changes in fair value of plan assets, funded status, and amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of condition for the Corporation’s pension plans at December 31, 20072009 and 2006.2008.

    
 2007 2006 2009 2008
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Change in Benefit Obligation:
                    
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $12,903  $10,797  $9,923  $11,497 
Service cost  627   976   —   — 
Interest cost  707   621   606   676 
Actuarial (gain) loss  (361)   875 
Actuarial loss  617   107 
Benefits paid  (345)   (366)   (486)   (663) 
Curtailments  (2,034)   —   —   (719) 
Settlement  —   (975) 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year $11,497  $12,903  $10,660  $9,923 
Change in Plan Assets 
Change in Plan Assets:
          
Fair value of plan assets at beginning year $8,800  $7,332  $5,734  $9,008 
Actual return on plan assets  145   1,084   930   (2,728) 
Employer contributions  408   750   474   1,092 
Benefits paid  (345)   (366)   (486)   (663) 
Settlement  —   (975) 
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $9,008  $8,800  $6,652  $5,734 
Funded status $(2,489)  $(4,103)  $(4,008)  $(4,189) 
Unrecognized net asset  —   — 
Unrecognized prior service cost  —   27 
Unrecognized net actuarial loss  795   1,493 
Accrued benefit cost $(1,694)  $(2,583) 

F-30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11 — PensionAmounts related to unrecognized actuarial losses for the plan, on a pre-tax basis, that have been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2009 and Other Benefits  – (continued)

2008 amounted to $3,914,000 and $4,082,000, respectively.

The net periodic pension cost for 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 includes the following components:

      
 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Service cost $627  $1,000  $796  $—  $—  $627 
Interest cost  707   621   599   606   701   707 
Expected return on plan assets  (674)   (592)   (533)   (288)   (658)   (674) 
Net amortization and deferral  13   124   91   —   —   13 
Recognized curtailment gain  (1,155)   —   —   —   —   (1,155) 
Net periodic pension (benefit) expense $(482)  $1,153  $953 
Net periodic pension expense (benefit) $318  $43  $(482) 

The following table presents the assumptions used to calculate the projected benefit obligation in each of the last three years.

   
 2007 2006 2005   
 (Dollars in Thousands) 2009 2008 2007
Discount rate  5.75%   5.75%   5.75%   5.75%   6.25%   5.75% 
Rate of compensation increase  4.25%   4.25%   4.25%   N/A   N/A   4.25% 
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  7.50%   7.50%   7.50%   5.00%   7.50%   7.50% 

The Corporation implemented SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined BenefitTABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Pension and Other Postretirement PlansBenefits  – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” at December 31, 2006. SFAS No. 158 requires the funded status of pension plans to be recorded in the statement of condition as an asset for plans with an over funded status and a liability for plans with an under funded status. The Corporation recognized the under funded status of its pension plans as a liability in the statement of condition as of December 31, 2007.

(continued)

The following information is provided at December 31:

     
 2007 2006 2009 2008 2007
 (Dollars in Thousands) (Dollars in Thousands)
Information for Plans with a Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
          
Information for Plans With a Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
               
Projected benefit obligation $11,497  $12,903  $10,660  $9,923  $11,497 
Accumulated benefit obligation  11,497   10,684   10,660   9,923   11,497 
Fair value of plan assets  9,008   8,800   6,652   5,734   9,008 
Assumptions
                         
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31
                         
Discount rate  6.25%   5.75%   6.25%   6.25%   6.25% 
Rate of compensation increase  N/A   4.25%   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Weighted average assumptions used to determine Net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31
          
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for years ended December 31
               
Discount rate  5.75%   5.75%   6.25%   6.25%   5.75% 
Expected long-term return on plan assets  7.50%   7.50%   5.00%   7.50%   7.50% 
Rate of compensation increase  4.25%   4.25%   N/A   N/A   4.25% 

The process of determining the overall expected long-term rate of return on plan assets begins with a review of appropriate investment data, including current yields on fixed income securities, historical investment data, historical plan performance and forecasts of inflation and future total returns for the various

F-31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 11 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

asset classes. This data forms the basis for the construction of a best-estimate range of real investment return for each asset class. An average, weighted real-return range is computed reflecting the Plan’s expected asset mix, and that range, when combined with an expected inflation range, produces an overall best-estimate expected return range. Specific factors such as the Plan’s investment policy, reinvestment risk and investment volatility are taken into consideration during the construction of the best estimate real return range, as well as in the selection of the final return assumption from within the range.

Plan Assets

The Union Center National Bank Pension Trust’s weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, by asset category, is as follows:

      
Asset Category 2007 2006 2005 2009 2008 2007
Equity securities  80%   79%   76%   44%   48%   80% 
Debt and/or fixed income securities  20%   21%   23%   46%   34%   20% 
Other  0%   0%   1% 
Alternative investments, including commodities, foreign currency and real estate  5%   9%   — 
Cash and other alternative investments, including hedge funds, equity structured notes  5%   9%   — 
Total  100%   100%   100%   100%   100%   100% 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

The general investment policy of the Pension Trust is for the fund to experience growth in assets that will allow the market value to exceed the value of benefit obligations over time. Appropriate diversification on a total fund basis is achieved by following an allowable range of commitment within asset category, as follows:

  
 Range Target
Equity securities  1536 – 8052%   7544% 
Debt and/or fixed income securities  2038 – 6554%   2546% 
International equity  0 – 10% N/A  0%N/A 
Short term  10N/AN/A
Other7 – 4014%   0 – 510% 

The fair value of the Corporation’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2009, by asset category, are as follows:

    
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
   December 31,
2009		 Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)		 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Cash $1,020  $1,020  $—  $— 
Equity Securities:
                    
U.S. companies  1,327   1,327   —   — 
International companies  1,163   1,163   —   — 
U.S. Treasury securities  2,301   2,301   —   — 
Corporate bonds  340   340   —   — 
Commodities  170   170   —   — 
Hedge funds  331   —   —   331 
Total $6,652  $6,321  $—  $331 

The following table presents the changes in pension plan asset with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31:

 
 2009
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, $663 
Actual return on plan assets:
     
Relating to assets still held at the reporting date  88 
Relating to assets sold during the period  — 
Purchases, sales and settlements  — 
Transfers out of Level 3  (420) 
Ending balance, December 31, $331 

The investment manager is not authorized to purchase, acquire or otherwise hold certain types of market securities (subordinated bonds, commodities, real estate investment trusts, limited partnerships, naked puts, naked calls, stock index futures, oil, gas or mineral exploration ventures or unregistered securities) or to employ certain types of market techniques (margin purchases or short sales) or to mortgage, pledge, hypothecate, or in any manner transfer as security for indebtedness, any security owned or held by the Plan.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Pension and Other Benefits  – (continued)

Cash Flows

Contributions

The Bank expects to contribute $250,000$646,000 to its Pension Trust in 2008.2010.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, that are expected to be paid in each year 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and years 2013-2017, respectively are $630,472, $694,013, $687,356, $701,124, $788,9642015-2019, respectively: $641,464, $655,491, $740,493, $768,895, $803,473 and $4,301,112.$4,124,112.

401(k) Benefit Plan

The Corporation maintains a 401(k) employee savings plan to provide for defined contributions which covers substantially all employees of the Corporation. Prior to October 1, 2007, the Corporation’s contributions to the plan were limited to fifty percent of a matching percentage of each employee’s contribution up to six percent of the employee’s salary. Effective October 1, 2007, the Corporation redesigned its 401(k) plan to provide a dollar-for-dollar matching contribution up to six percent of salary deferrals. For 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, employer contributions amounted to $192,659, $152,450$266,000, $281,000 and $134,367,$193,000, respectively.

Note 16 — Stock Based Compensation

Stock Option Plans

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation maintained two stock-based compensation plans from which new grants could be issued. The 2009 Equity Incentive Plan permits the grant of “incentive stock options” as defined under the Internal Revenue Code, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards to employees, including officers, and consultants of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan permits the grant of non-qualified stock options to the Corporation’s non-employee directors. An aggregate of 400,000 shares remain available for grant under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and an aggregate of 452,874 shares remain available for grant under the 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. Such shares may be treasury shares, newly issued shares or a combination thereof.

Options have been granted to purchase common stock principally at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options are exercisable over a three year vesting period starting one year after the date of grant and generally expire ten years from the date of grant.

The total compensation expense related to these plans was $77,000, $128,000 and $151,000 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $77,000 and $51,000, respectively, as a result of the compensation expense related to stock options. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $128,000 and $84,000, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income was reduced by $151,000 and $100,000, respectively.

Under the principal option plans, the Corporation may grant restricted stock awards to certain employees. Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards. Restricted stock awards are independent of option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the release of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest during a period specified at the date of grant. During that period, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and is considered to be currently issued and outstanding. The Corporation expenses the cost of the restricted stock awards, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant,

F-32


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1216 — Income TaxesStock Based Compensation  – (continued)

ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. During 2009, no shares were awarded while in 2008, there were 3,028 shares awarded. During 2007, no shares were awarded. All shares were issued from Treasury shares. In 2009, there were no compensation costs related to restricted stock awards included in salary expense. The currentamount of compensation cost related to restricted stock awards included in salary expense was approximately $25,000 in 2008 and deferred amountsnone in 2007. As of income tax expense (benefit) forDecember 31, 2009, all shares of restricted stock awards were vested. Thus, there were no restricted stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Options covering 38,203, 38,203 and 38,203 shares were granted on March 1, 2009, March 1, 2008 and June 1, 2007, respectively. The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the yearsBlack-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted average fair values:

   
 2009 2008 2007
Weighted average fair value of grants $1.48  $3.10  $6.48 
Risk-free interest rate  1.90%   3.03%   4.92% 
Dividend yield  4.69%   2.43%   2.51% 
Expected volatility  33.0%   30.2%   47.4% 
Expected life in months  69   88   72 

Option activity under the principal option plans as of December 31, 2009 and changes during the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, are2009 were as follows:

   
 2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Current:
               
Federal $1,693  $1,627  $3,057 
State  313   324   122 
    2,006   1,951   3,179 
Deferred:
               
Federal  (3,731)   (4,090)   (1,545) 
State  (1,208)   (1,190)   (450) 
    (4,939)   (5,280)   (1,995) 
Income tax (benefit) expense $(2,933)  $(3,329)  $1,184 
    
 Shares Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price		 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(In Years)		 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008  185,164  $10.45           
Granted  38,203   7.67           
Exercised  (9,289)   6.07           
Forfeited/cancelled/expired  (22,076)   11.04           
Outstanding at December 31, 2009  192,002  $10.04   5.82  $91,679 
Exercisable at December 31, 2009  124,271  $10.05   4.36  $48,267 

DuringThe aggregate intrinsic value of options above represents the fourth quartertotal pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Corporation’s closing stock price on the last trading day of 2006, the Corporation effected an internal entity structure reorganizationtwelve-months of its subsidiary companies to streamlinefiscal 2009 and consolidate the various subsidiary companies. We simplified our structureexercise price, multiplied by reducing the number of operating subsidiary entities. Plans of liquidation were adopted and affected for 2006 and this resulted in a $2.6 million federal tax benefit of which $1.4 million is reflected inin-the-money options) that would have been received by the 2006 current net tax benefit. The liquidation was completed in November of 2007 and as a result for the year endedoption holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31, 2007,2009. This amount changes based on the Corporation recognized an additional $2.4 million federal tax benefit of which $1.3 million is reflected in the 2007 current net tax benefit.

Reconciliation between the amount of reported income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate is as follows:

   
 2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Income before income tax expense $923  $569  $8,830 
Federal statutory rate  34%   34%   34% 
Computed “expected” Federal income tax expense  314   193   3,002 
State tax net of Federal tax benefit  (591)   (572)   (216) 
Bank owned life insurance  (313)   (265)   (252) 
Tax-exempt interest and dividends  (1,080)   (1,332)   (1,206) 
Internal entity reorganization of subsidiaries  (1,285)   (1,400)   — 
Other, net  22   47   (144) 
Income tax (benefit) expense $(2,933)  $(3,329)  $1,184 

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portionsfair market value of the deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are presented below:Parent Corporation’s stock.

F-33


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1216 — Income TaxesStock Based Compensation  – (continued)

  
 2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
          
Allowance for loan losses $1,740  $1,600 
Employee benefit plans  921   1,394 
Unrealized loss on securities available-for-sale and tax benefits related to adoption of SFAS 158 and other comprehensive income  3,335   2,293 
Other  381   518 
Federal NOL and AMT Credits  9,080   5,258 
NJ NOL and AMA credits  2,272   1,479 
Total deferred tax asset $17,729  $12,542 
Deferred tax liabilities:
          
Depreciation $289  $287 
Market discount accretion  41   510 
Deferred loan costs, net of fees  546   547 
Purchase accounting  180   292 
Other  33   67 
Total deferred tax liabilities  1,089   1,703 
Net deferred tax asset $16,640  $10,839 

Based on the Corporation’s historical and current pre-tax earnings and the availability of net operating loss carry-backs on a Federal basis, management believes it is more likely than not that the Corporation will realize the benefit of the net deductible temporary differences existing at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

At December 31, 2007, the Corporation has federal income tax loss carryforwards of approximately $21.1 million, which have expirations beginning in the year 2023 and has state income tax loss carryforwards of approximately $34.7 million which have expirations beginning in the year 2011.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependant upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible, Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. During 2007 and 2006, based on the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, the Corporation believes the net deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.

The Corporation's federal income tax returns are open and subject to examination from the 2004 tax return year and forward. The Corporation's state income tax returns are generally open from the 2004 and later tax return years based on individual state statute of limitations.

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Requirements

On June 30, 2005, the Parent Corporation issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock to a limited number of accredited investors in a private placement of its securities. The shares were issued at a purchase price of $10.00 per share. Net proceeds to the Parent Corporation were approximately $18.9 million, after commissions and expenses.

F-34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Requirements  – (continued)

Regulatory Capital

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and FRB regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2007, the Bank was required to maintain (i) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier I capital to total adjusted assets of 4.00%, and (ii) minimum ratios of Tier I and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively.

Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the regulators are required to take certain supervisory actions with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution’s financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of financial institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage (Tier I) capital ratio of at least 5.00%; a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.00%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.00%.

The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about capital components, risk weightings and other factors.

As of December 31, 2007, management believes that2009, $143,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years. Changes in options outstanding during the Bank and the Parent Corporation meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject and is a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective action regulations.

The following is a summary of the Bank’s and the Parent Corporation’s actual capital amounts and ratiospast three years were as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, compared to the FRB and FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FRB and FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.follows:

      
 FDIC Requirements
   Union Center
National Bank
Actual		 Minimum Capital
Adequacy		 For Classification
as Well Capitalized
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
   (Dollars in Thousands)
December 31, 2007 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $78,064   8.02%  $39,842   4.00%  $48,943   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1  78,064   11.48%   27,211   4.00%   40,817   6.00% 
Total  83,227   12.23%   54,422   8.00%   68,028   10.00% 
December 31, 2006 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $82,113   8.12%  $41,250   4.00%  $50,697   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1  82,113   12.37%   26,558   4.00%   39,837   6.00% 
Total  87,073   13.11%   53,116   8.00%   66,396   10.00% 
  
Stock Option Plan Shares Exercise Price
Range per Share
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 (262,527 shares exercisable)  340,850  $6.07 to $15.12 
Granted during 2007  38,203  $15.73 
Exercised during 2007  (95,861)  $6.07 to $10.66 
Expired or canceled during 2007  (18,937)  $10.50 to $15.73 
Outstanding, December 31, 2007 (188,273 shares exercisable)  264,255  $6.07 to $15.73 
Granted during 2008  38,203  $11.15 
Exercised during 2008  (25,583)  $6.07 to $10.66 
Expired or canceled during 2008  (91,711)  $6.07 to $15.73 
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 (125,468 shares exercisable)  185,164  $6.07 to $15.73 
Granted during 2009  38,203  $7.67 
Exercised during 2009  (9,289)  $6.07 
Expired or canceled during 2009  (22,076)  $6.07 to $15.73 
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 (124,271 shares exercisable)  192,002  $7.67 to $15.73 

F-35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 13 — Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Requirements  – (continued)

      
 Parent Corporation
Actual		 Minimum Capital
Adequacy		 For Classification
as Well Capitalized
   Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
   (Dollars in Thousands)
December 31, 2007 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $79,054   8.13%  $39,823   4.00%  $48,919   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1  79,054   11.65%   27,142   4.00%   40,714   6.00% 
Total  84,217   12.41%   54,285   8.00%   N/A   N/A 
December 31, 2006 Leverage (Tier 1) capital $87,955   8.64%  $41,524   4.00%  $51,040   5.00% 
Risk-Based Capital:
                              
Tier 1  87,955   13.14%   26,699   4.00%   40,048   6.00% 
Total  92,915   13.88%   53,398   8.00%   N/A   N/A 

The Corporation issued $5.2 million of subordinated debentures in 2003. These securities are included as a component of Tier 1 Capital for regulatory purposes.

On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule that allows the continued inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred securities in the Tier I Capital of bank holding companies, subject to stricter quantitative limits and qualitative standards. The new quantitative limits become effective after a five-year transition period ending March 31, 2009. Under the final rules, trust preferred securities and other restricted core capital elements are limited to 25% of all core capital elements. Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of these limits may be included in Tier II Capital. At December 31, 2005, the only restricted core capital element owned by the Corporation is trust preferred securities. Based onDirector Stock Option Plan, there were stock options granted with a preliminary review of the final rule, the Corporation believes that its trust preferred issues qualify as Tier I Capital. However, in the event that the trust preferred issues do not qualify as Tier I Capital, the Corporation would remain well capitalized.

Note 14 — Subordinated Debentures

During 2001 and 2003, the Corporation formed statutory business trusts, which exist for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing Trust Securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trusts are not consolidated in accordance with FASB interpretation No. 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts below have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities of the Corporation’s Statutory Trust II at December 31, 2007.

Issuance DateSecurities IssuedLiquidation ValueCoupon RateMaturityRedeemable by Issuer Beginning
12/19/03$5,000,000$1,000 per
Capital Security		Floating 3-month
LIBOR + 285
Basis Points		01/23/203401/23/2009

On December 18, 2006 the Corporation dissolved its Statutory Trust I, in connection with the redemption of $10.3 million of subordinated debentures.

F-36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (SFAS 107), requires that the Corporation disclose estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Corporation’s financial instruments:

The carrying amounts for cash and cash-equivalents approximate fair value because they mature in 90 days or less and do not present unanticipated credit concerns. Theweighted average fair value of investment securities is estimated based on quoted market prices received from securities dealers. Stock of38,203 and $1.48, 38,203 and $3.10 and 38,203 and $6.48 during the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank is carried at cost.

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, real estate-mortgage, and installment loans.

The fair value of performing loans, except residential mortgages, is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the historical experience of the Bank with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. For performing residential mortgage loans, fair value is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates using discount rates based on secondary market sources adjusted to reflect differences in servicing and credit costs.

The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable approximate fair value.

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings and interest-bearing checking accounts, and money market and checking accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as ofyears ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and 2006. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based onrespectively. There were no stock options granted under the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated usingEmployee Stock Incentive Plan during the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-term borrowings that mature within six months and securities sold under agreements to repurchase have fair values which approximate carrying value.

The fair value of FHLB advances is based on the discounted value of estimated cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances.

The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using market discount rates of financial instruments with similar characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

The fair value of commitments to extend credits is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rate and the committed rates. The fair value of financial standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties.

The fair values related to commitment and letters of credit are deemed immaterial and omitted from the disclosure below.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Corporation’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.

Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature,

F-37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on-and-off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include deferred tax assets and liabilities, goodwill, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered.

The estimated fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments is as follows:

    
 December 31,
   2007 2006
   Carrying
Amount		 Fair
Value		 Carrying
Amount		 Fair
Value
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Financial Assets:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $70,031  $70,031  $44,363  $44,363 
Investments available-for-sale  314,194   314,194   250,603   250,603 
Investments held to maturity  —   —   131,130   130,900 
Net loans  546,506   550,978   545,454   541,672 
Accrued interest receivable  4,535   4,535   4,932   4,932 
Financial Liabilities:
                    
Non-interest-bearing deposits  111,422   111,422   136,453   136,453 
Interest-bearing deposits  587,648   587,941   590,318   589,941 
Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase and FHLB advances  218,109   222,231   206,434   207,549 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,014   5,155   5,040 
Accrued interest payable  1,721   1,721   1,817   1,817 

Note 16 — Deposits

The table below provides information regarding the aggregate of amount and maturity of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as ofyears ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 
 Amount
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Due in 0 to 3 Months $28,017 
Due in 4 to 6 Months  15,669 
Due in 7 to 12 Months  17,135 
Due in 2009  2,231 
Due in 2010  462 
Due in 2011  254 
Due in 2012  229 
Total $63,997 

F-38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 — Parent Corporation Only Financial Statements

The Parent Corporation operates its wholly owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank. The earnings of this subsidiary are recognized by the Corporation using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, earnings are recorded as increases in the Corporation’s investment in the subsidiaries and dividends paid reduce the investment in the subsidiaries. The ability of the Parent Corporation to pay dividends will largely depend upon the dividends paid to it by the Bank. Dividends payable by the Bank to the Corporation are restricted under supervisory regulations (see Note 18).

Condensed financial statements of the Parent Corporation only are as follows:

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

  
 At December 31,
   2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
ASSETS
          
Cash and cash equivalents $106  $529 
Investment in subsidiary  89,851   96,732 
Securities available for sale  2,066   4,698 
Other assets  1,235   1,320 
Total assets $93,258  $103,279 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          
Other liabilities $825  $511 
Securities sold under repurchase agreement  2,000   — 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,155 
Stockholders’ equity  85,278   97,613 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $93,258  $103,279 

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

   
 For Years Ended December 31,
   2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Income:
               
Dividend income from subsidiary $7,074  $4,770  $6,055 
Other income  153   684   334 
Management fees  221   266   315 
Total Income  7,448   5,720   6,704 
Expenses  (1,718)   (1,866)   (1,357) 
Income before equity in undistributed (loss) earnings of subsidiary  5,730   3,854   5,347 
Equity in undistributed (loss) earnings of subsidiary  (1,874)   44   2,299 
Net Income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 

F-39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 17 — Parent Corporation Only Financial Statements  – (continued)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
 For Years Ended December 31
   2007 2006 2005
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Operating Activities:
               
Net income $3,856  $3,898  $7,646 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Gain on securities sold  (95)   (315)   0 
Equity in undistributed loss (earnings) of subsidiary  1,874   (44)   (2,299) 
Decrease (increase) in other assets  1,516   291   (439) 
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities  (1,114)   (892)   459 
Stock based compensation  151   160   0 
Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on investment securities, net  0   39   0 
Net cash provided by operating activities  6,188   3,137   5,367 
Investing Activities:
               
Purchases of available-for-sale securities  (5,070)   (13,300)   (46,635) 
Maturity of available-for-sale securities  6,887   24,838   42,585 
Cash consideration paid to acquire Red Oak Bank  0   0   (13,279) 
Investments in subsidiary  3,500   0   0 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  5,317   11,538   (17,329) 
Financing Activities:
               
Net increase in borrowings  2,000   0   0 
Cash dividends paid  (4,885)   (4,808)   (4,518) 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  850   674   399 
Repurchase of treasury stock  (10,027)   (3,366)   0 
(Redemption)/issuance of common stock  (21)   (16)   19,105 
Redemption of subordinated debentures  0   (10,310)   0 
Tax benefits from stock based compensation  155   350   0 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (11,928)   (17,476)   14,986 
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (423)   (2,801)   3,024 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  529   3,330   306 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year $106  $529  $3,330 

Note 18 — Dividends and Other Restrictions

Certain restrictions, including capital requirements, exist on the availability of undistributed net profits of the Bank for the future payment of dividends to the Parent Corporation. A dividend may not be paid if it would impair the capital of the Bank. Furthermore, prior approval by the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the total of dividends declared in a calendar year exceeds the total of the Bank’s net profits for that year combined with the retained profits for the two preceding years. During 2007,Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the Bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Bank may not declare dividends without prior approval of the OCC. At December 31, 2009, approximately $7.1$5.2 million was paid by the bank inavailable for payment of dividends to the Corporation based on the preceding guidelines.

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporation’s financial and non-financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial and non-financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial and non-financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10-05 (previously SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”). FASB ASC 820-10-05 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure

F-40


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10-15 (previously FASB Statement Position 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”). FASB ASC 820-10-15 delays the effective date of FASB ASC 820-10-05 for all non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. As such, the Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05 relating to non-financial assets and liabilities in 2009. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10-35 (previously FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for that Asset is Not Active”), to clarify the application of the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. FASB ASC 820-10-35 was applied to the Corporation’s December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10-05 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This ASC also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. This ASC is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. FASB ASC 820-10-65 was applied to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, effective June 30, 2009.

FASB ASC 820-10-05 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The Hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820-10-05 are as follows:

•Level 1:  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
•Level 2:  Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
•Level 3:  Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (for example, supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair value.

Securities Available-for-Sale

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified with Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 inputs include securities that have quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Examples of instruments, which would generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include municipal bonds and certain agency collateralized mortgage obligations. In certain cases where there is limited activity in the market for a particular instrument, assumptions must be made to determine their fair value and are classified as Level 3. Due to the inactive condition of the markets amidst the financial crisis, the Corporation treated certain securities as Level 3 securities in order to provide more appropriate valuations. For assets in an inactive market, the infrequent trades that do occur are not a true indication of fair value. When measuring fair value, the valuation techniques available under the market approach, income approach and/or cost approach are used. The Corporation’s evaluations are based on market data and the Corporation employs combinations of these approaches for its valuation methods depending on the asset class.

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation’s two pooled trust preferred securities and one private issue single name trust preferred security were classified as Level 3. During 2009, there was a marked improvement in the pricing of financial institutions debt securities. As a result, all private label collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and all but one of the single issuer trust preferred securities, were transferred back to Level 2 pricing. Market pricing for these Level 3 securities varied widely from one pricing service to another based on the lack of trading. As such, these securities were considered to no longer have readily observable market data that was accurate to support a fair value as prescribed by FASB ASC 820-10-05. The fair value measurement objective remained the same in that the price received by the Corporation would result from an orderly transaction (an exit price notion) and that the observable transactions considered in fair value were not forced liquidations or distressed sales at the measurement date.

In regards to the pooled trust preferred securities (“pooled TRUPS”) and the private issue single name trust preferred security (“single name TRUP”), or collectively (“TRUPS”), the Corporation was able to determine fair value of the TRUPS using a market approach validation technique based on Level 2 inputs that did not require significant adjustments. The Level 2 inputs included:

(a)Quoted prices in active markets for similar TRUPS with insignificant adjustments for differences between the TRUPS that the Corporation holds and similar TRUPS.
(b)Quoted prices in markets that are not active that represent current transactions for the same or similar TRUPS that do not require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs.

Since June 30, 2008, the market for these TRUPS has become increasingly inactive. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which these TRUPS trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels as well as other relevant factors. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation determined that the market for similar TRUPS had stabilized. That determination was made considering that there are more observable transactions for similar TRUPS, the prices for those transactions that have occurred are current and or represent fair value, and the observable prices for those transactions have stabilized over time, thus increasing the potential relevance of those observations. However, the Corporation’s three TRUPS at December 31, 2009 have been classified within Level 3 because the Corporation determined that significant adjustments using unobservable inputs are required to determine a true fair value at the measurement date.

The Corporation determined that an income approach valuation technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs will be equally or more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used at the prior measurement dates. As a result, the Corporation used the discount rate adjustment technique to determine fair value.

The fair value as of December 31, 2009 was determined by discounting the expected cash flows over the life of the security. The discount rate was determined by deriving a discount rate when the markets were considered more active for this type of security. To this estimated discount rate, additions were made for more liquid markets and increased credit risk as well as assessing the risks in the security, such as default risk and


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

severity risk. With the exception of the two pooled trust preferred securities, for which $3.4 million of impairment charges were taken to earnings during 2009, the securities continue to make scheduled cash flows and no material cash flow payment defaults have occurred to date.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are required to be measured at the lower of cost or fair value. Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, market value is to represent fair value. Management obtains quotes or bids on all or part of these loans directly from the purchasing financial institutions.

Loans Receivable

The fair value of performing loans, except residential mortgages, is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the historical experience of the Bank with prepayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. For performing residential mortgage loans, fair value is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows adjusted for prepayment estimates using discount rates based on secondary market sources adjusted to reflect differences in servicing and credit costs.

Restricted Stocks

The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stocks, which includes stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank, approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

The carrying value of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.

Deposits

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings and interest-bearing checking accounts, and money market and checking accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Short-Term Borrowings

Short-term borrowings that mature within six months and securities sold under agreements to repurchase have fair values which approximate carrying value.

Long-Term Borrowings

Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.

Subordinated Debt

The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows, using market discount rates of financial instruments with similar characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credits is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

current levels of interest rate and the committed rates. The fair value of financial standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

For financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

    
  Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
   December 31,
2009		 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)		 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
                    
U.S. Treasury & Agency Securities $2,089  $2,089  $—  $— 
Federal Agency Obligations  214,585   55,470   159,115   — 
Obligations of U.S. States and Political Subdivision  19,281   —   19,281   — 
Trust preferred securities  26,715   —   24,366   2,349 
Other debt securities  29,921   7,248   22,673   — 
Equity securities  5,533   5,533   —   — 
Securities available-for-sale $298,124  $70,340  $225,435  $2,349 

    
  Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
   December 31,
2008		 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)		 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
                    
U.S. Treasury & Agency Securities $100  $100  $—  $— 
Federal Agency Obligations  82,797   —   82,797   — 
Obligations of U.S. States and Political Subdivision  52,094   2,190   49,904   — 
Trust preferred securities  31,771   —   14,713   17,058 
Other debt securities  59,362   3,816   49,050   6,496 
Equity securities  16,590   16,590   —   — 
Securities available-for-sale $242,714  $22,696  $196,464  $23,554 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

The following table presents the changes in securities available-for-sale with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

 
 2009
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, $23,554 
Transfers out of Level 3  (19,855) 
Principal interest deferrals  139 
Total net losses included in net income  (4,403) 
Total net unrealized gains  2,914 
Ending balance, December 31, $2,349 

 
 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Beginning balance, January 1, $— 
Transfers in (out) of Level 3  27,629 
Principal paydowns  (309) 
Total net unrealized losses  (3,766) 
Ending balance, December 31, $23,554 

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements at December 31, 2009 are as follows:

    
  Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
   December 31,
2009		 Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)		 Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)		 Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis:
                    
Impaired loans $8,058  $—  $—  $8,058 

At December 31, 2009 and 2008, impaired loans totaled $8,058,000 and $634,000, respectively. The amount of related valuation allowances was $662,000 at December 31, 2009 and none at December 31, 2008.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2009 and 2008:

Impaired Loans

The value of an impaired loan is measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, such as residential mortgage loans and installment loans, are specifically excluded from the impaired loan portfolio. The Corporation’s impaired loans are primarily collateral dependent. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

Other Real Estate Owned

Certain assets such as other real estate owned (“OREO”) are measured at fair value less cost to sell. The Corporation believes that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05. Fair value of OREO is determined by sales agreements or appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers approved and hired by the Corporation. Costs to sell associated with OREO is based on estimation per the terms and conditions of the sales agreements or appraisal. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation held no OREO as the residential real estate condominium project was sold during the third quarter of 2009.

FASB ASC 825-10 requires all entities to disclose the estimated fair value of their financial instrument assets and liabilities. For the Corporation, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments as defined in FASB ASC 825-10. Many of the Corporation’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. It is also the Corporation’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity and to not engage in trading or sales activities except for loans held-for-sale and available-for-sale securities. Therefore, significant estimations and assumptions, as well as present value calculations, were used by the Corporation for the purposes of this disclosure.

Estimated fair values have been determined by the Corporation using the best available data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. For those loans and deposits with floating interest rates, it is presumed that estimated fair values generally approximate the recorded book balances. The estimation methodologies used, the estimated fair values, and the recorded book balances at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were as follows:

    
 December 31,
   2009 2008
   Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value
   (Dollars in Thousands)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents $89,168  $89,168  $15,031  $15,031 
Investment securities available-for-sale  298,124   298,124   242,714   242,714 
Net loans  707,178   713,474   669,949   673,976 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  10,672   10,672   10,230   10,230 
Accrued interest receivable  4,033   4,033   4,154   4,154 
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
                    
Non-interest-bearing deposits  130,518   130,518   113,319   113,319 
Interest-bearing deposits  683,187   683,974   546,218   548,747 
Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreement to repurchase and FHLB advances  269,253   279,219   268,440   296,144 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,155   5,155   4,875 
Accrued interest payable  1,825   1,825   2,201   2,201 

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values.

The Corporation’s remaining assets and liabilities, which are not considered financial instruments, have not been valued differently than has been customary with historical cost accounting. No disclosure of the relationship value of the Corporation’s core deposit base is required by FASB ASC 825-10.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments, without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. For example, there are certain significant assets and liabilities that are not considered


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 18 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments  – (continued)

financial assets or liabilities, such as the brokerage network, deferred taxes, premises and equipment, and goodwill. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

Management believes that reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely, due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made, given the absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies also introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.

Note 19 — Parent Corporation Only Financial Statements

The Parent Corporation operates its wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank. The earnings of this subsidiary are recognized by the Corporation using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, earnings are recorded as increases in the Corporation’s investment in the subsidiaries and dividends paid reduce the investment in the subsidiaries. The ability of the Parent Corporation to pay dividends will largely depend upon the dividends paid to it by the Bank. Dividends payable by the Bank to the Corporation are restricted under supervisory regulations (see Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Condensed financial statements of the Parent Corporation only are as follows:

Condensed Statements of Condition

  
 At December 31,
   2009 2008
   (Dollars in Thousands)
ASSETS
          
Cash and cash equivalents $2,683  $922 
Investment in subsidiaries  104,946   85,229 
Securities available for sale  501   1,255 
Other assets  248   1,306 
Total assets $108,378  $88,712 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          
Other liabilities $280  $1,041 
Securities sold under repurchase agreement  392   803 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,155 
Stockholders’ equity  102,551   81,713 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $108,378  $88,712 

Condensed Statements of Income

   
 For Years Ended December 31,
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Income:
               
Dividend income from subsidiaries $2,474  $4,675  $7,074 
Other income  3   37   58 
Net securities gains (losses)  (325)   (413)   95 
Management fees  298   275   221 
Total Income  2,450   4,574   7,448 
Expenses  (604)   (623)   (1,718) 
Income before equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries  1,846   3,951   5,730 
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries  2,727   1,891   (1,874) 
Net Income $4,573  $5,842  $3,856 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 19 — Commitments, Contingencies and ConcentrationsParent Corporation Only Financial Statements  – (continued)

Condensed Statements of Credit Risk

In the normal course of business, the Corporation has outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as standby and commercial letters of credit, unused portions of lines of credit and commitments to extend various types of credit. Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit generally do not exceed one year. These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The commitment or contract amount of these financial instruments is an indicator of the Corporation’s level of involvement in each type of instrument as well as the exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument.

The Corporation controls the credit risk of these financial instruments through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. To minimize potential credit risk, the Corporation generally requires collateral and other credit-related terms and conditions from the customer. In the opinion of management, the financial condition of the Corporation will not be materially affected by the final outcome of these commitments and contingent liabilities.

A substantial portion of the Bank’s loans is represented by one to four family residential first mortgage loans secured by real estate located in New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio of the Bank is susceptible to changes in the real estate market.

The following table provides a summary of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at December 31, 2007 and 2006:

Cash Flows

  
 2007 2006
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Commitments under commercial loans and lines of credit $27,488  $41,670 
Home equity and other revolving lines of credit  71,810   73,111 
Outstanding commercial mortgage loan commitments  70,110   26,279 
Standby letters of credit  2,407   7,396 
Performance letters of credit  12,977   10,984 
Outstanding residential mortgage loan commitments  605   608 
Overdraft protection lines  5,891   5,037 
Other consumer  0   9 
Total $191,288  $165,094 

Other expenses include rentals for premises and equipment of $1,003,715 in 2007, $680,702 in 2006 and $534,537 in 2005. At December 31, 2006, the Corporation was obligated under a number of non-cancelable leases for premises and equipment, many of which provide for increased rentals based upon increases in real estate taxes and the cost of living index. These leases, most of which have renewal provisions, are principally operating leases. Minimum rentals under the terms of these leases for the years 2008 through 2012 are $768,685, $635,424, $628,706, $699,933 and $690,621 respectively. Minimum rentals due 2013 and after are $5,579,815.

The Corporation is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business. Based upon the information currently available in connection with such claims, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such claims will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Corporation.

F-41

   
 For Years Ended December 31
   2009 2008 2007
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income $4,573  $5,842  $3,856 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Net securities losses (gains)  325   413   (95) 
Equity in undistributed loss (earnings) of subsidiary  (2,727)   (1,891)   1,874 
Change in deferred tax asset  (111)   (1,542)   — 
Decrease (increase) in other assets  1,838   41   1,516 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities  (844)   1,610   (1,114) 
Stock based compensation  77   128   151 
Net cash provided by operating activities  3,131   4,601   6,188 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of available-for-sale securities  —   (579)   (5,070) 
Maturity of available-for-sale securities  659   938   6,887 
(Investments in subsidiaries) and return of capital from subsidiaries  (19,000)   3,500   3,500 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (18,341)   3,859   5,317 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings  (411)   (1,197)   2,000 
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (3,166)   (4,675)   (4,885) 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  57   224   850 
Proceeds from restricted stock  —   25   — 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and warrants  10,000   —   — 
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock  (425)   —   — 
Proceeds from issuance of shares from rights offering  11,000   —   — 
Purchase of treasury stock  —   (1,924)   (10,027) 
Issuance cost of common stock  (11)   (19)   (21) 
Tax (expense) benefit from stock based compensation  (73)   (78)   155 
Net cash provided (used in) financing activities  16,971   (7,644)   (11,928) 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  1,761   816   (423) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  922   106   529 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year $2,683  $922  $106 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INCINC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
  
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 20 — Quarterly Financial Information of Center Baucorp,Bancorp, Inc. (Unaudited)

        
 2007 2009
 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data) (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Total interest income $12,797  $12,936  $12,944  $13,452  $12,971  $13,491  $12,706  $11,942 
Total interest expense  7,625   7,455   7,719   7,831   4,953   6,050   6,079   5,563 
Net interest income  5,172   5,481   5,225   5,621   8,018   7,441   6,627   6,379 
Provision for loan losses  150   100   100   0   1,404   280   156   1,421 
Total other income net of gains (losses) on securities sold  917   897   836   822 
Net gains (losses) on securities sold  (43)   14   341   588 
Total other income, net of securities gains  968   822   841   784 
Net securities gains (losses)  (1,308)   (511)   1,710   600 
Other expense  6,034   6,080   6,056   6,428   5,238   5,186   7,314   5,319 
Income (loss) before income taxes (benefit)  (138)   212   246   603 
Provision for income taxes (benefit)  (670)   (786)   (771)   (706) 
Income before income taxes  1,036   2,286   1,708   1,023 
Provision for income taxes  (2)   751   507   224 
Net income  532   998   1,017   1,309  $1,038  $1,535  $1,201  $799 
Net income available to common stockholders $896  $1,387  $1,053  $670 
Earnings per share:
                                        
Basic $0.04  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09  $0.06  $0.11  $0.08  $0.05 
Diluted $0.04  $0.07  $0.07  $0.09  $0.06  $0.11  $0.08  $0.05 
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
                                        
Basic  13,441,082   13,864,272   13,910,450   13,910,450   14,531,387   13,000,601   12,994,429   12,991,312 
Diluted  13,543,486   13,938,892   13,962,934   13,986,333   14,534,255   13,005,101   12,996,544   12,993,185 

        
 2006 2008
 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
 (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data) (Dollars in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
Total interest income $13,408  $13,632  $13,054  $13,231  $12,615  $12,689  $12,230  $12,360 
Total interest expense  7,717   7,680   6,746   6,831   5,792   5,829   5,801   6,673 
Net interest income  5,691   5,952   6,308   6,400   6,823   6,860   6,429   5,687 
Provision for loan losses  57   0   0   0   425   465   521   150 
Total other income net of gains (losses) on securities sold  817   795   796   790 
Net gains (losses) on securities sold  801   212   77   (3,655)(1) 
Total other income, net of securities gains  871   1,122   891   866 
Net securities gains (losses)  (256)   (1,075)   225   0 
Other expense  6,656   5,735   5,766   6,201   4,754   4,578   5,188   4,953 
Income (loss) before income taxes (benefit)  596   1,224   1,415   (2,666) 
Provision for income taxes (benefit)  (1,695)   (78)   43   (1,599) 
Net income (loss)  2,291   1,302   1,372   (1,067) 
Income before income taxes  2,259   1,864   1,836   1,450 
Provision for income taxes  560   346   428   233 
Net income $1,699  $1,518  $1,408  $1,217 
Earnings per share:
                                        
Basic $0.16  $0.09  $0.10  $(0.08)  $0.13  $0.12  $0.11  $0.09 
Diluted $0.16  $0.09  $0.10  $(0.08)  $0.13  $0.12  $0.11  $0.09 
Weighted average common shares
outstanding:
                                        
Basic  13,898,178   13,896,165   13,940,396   14,106,987   12,989,304   12,990,441   13,070,868   13,144,747 
Diluted  13,980,270   13,989,262   14,020,835   14,106,987   12,995,134   13,003,954   13,083,558   13,163,586 

Note: Due to rounding, quarterly earnings per share may not add upsum to reported annual earnings per share.

(1)On March 23, 2006, as part of the restructuring, the Corporation sold approximately $86.3 million of available-for-sale securities, which were yielding less than 4 percent from its securities portfolio. The sale resulted in an after-tax charge of approximately $2.4 million in the first quarter period ended March 31, 2006 or $(.17) per common share.

F-42


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9. Changes Inin and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

NoneNone.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports filed or submitted pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in its Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Corporation evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of December 31, 2007.2009. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date as described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)).

There have been no significant changes in the Corporation’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

(b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Corporation’s internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporation’s management, Board of Directors and shareholders regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As part of the Corporation’s program to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.2009 (the “Assessment”). In making this assessment,Assessment, management used the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission published in its report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Management’s assessmentAssessment included an evaluation of the design of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessmentAssessment with the Audit Committee.

Based on this assessment,Assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2007,2009, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Beard Miller Company LLP,TABLE OF CONTENTS

ParenteBeard LLC, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

audit report on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.2009. The report, which expresses an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, is included in this item under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

(c) Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Center Bancorp, Inc.

We have audited Center Bancorp, Inc.’s (the Corporation)“Corporation”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’sCenter Bancorp, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’scorporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’scorporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the companycorporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’scorporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Center Bancorp, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Center Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries and the related consolidated statement of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two yearthree-year period ended December 31, 20072009 and our report dated March 12,200816, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
opinion.

/s/ Beard Miller Company LLPParenteBeard LLC

Beard Miller Company LLPParenteBeard LLC
Reading, Pennsylvania
March 12, 200816, 2010

52


TABLE OF CONTENTS

(d) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There werehave been no changes in the Corporation’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as such term is definedidentified in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act,Assessment that occurred during the last fiscal quarter of the period covered byto which this reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting, subsequent to December 31, 2007.reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Corporate Governance

The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Certain information on Executive Officers of the registrant is included in Part I, Item 4A3A of this report, which is also incorporated herein by reference.

The Corporation maintains a code of ethics applicable to the Corporation’s chief executive officer, senior financial professional personnel (including the Corporation’s chief financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar transactions), all other executive officers and all directors. The Corporation also maintains a code of conduct applicable to all other employees. Copies of both codes were filed as exhibits to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Corporation will provide copies of such codes to any person without charge, upon request to Anthony C. Weagley, President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer, Center Bancorp, Inc., 2455 Morris Avenue, Union, NJ 07083.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Stock Compensation Plan Information

For information related to stock based compensation, see Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table gives information about the Corporation’s common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Corporation’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Incentive Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan, 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan and 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan as of December 31, 2009. These plans were the Corporation’s only equity compensation plans in existence as of December 31, 2009.

   
Plan Category Number of Securities
to Be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)		 Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)		 Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders  192,002  $7.67 – $15.73   1,079,622 
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders  —   —   — 
Total  192,002  $7.67 – $15.73   1,079,622 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The Corporation responds to this item by incorporating herein by reference the material responsive to such item in the Corporation’s definitive proxy statement for its 20082010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

53


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

a.(a)(1) Financial Statements and Schedules:

The following Financial Statements and Supplementary Data are filed as part of this annual report:

Consolidated Statements of Condition
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Statements of Condition

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

b.(b)Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K) filed herewith incorporated by reference as part of this annual report.

 
Exhibit
No.		 Description
3.1 The Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation, including the Registrant’s Certificate of the RegistrantAmendment, dated January 8, 2009, is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s QuarterlyCurrent Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.8-K dated January 13, 2010.
3.2 By-Laws of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
10.14.1 Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John F. McGowan, effective asWarrant to Purchase up to 173,410 shares of Common Stock, dated January 1, 2007,9, 2009, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.2Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John J. Davis effective January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.dated January 13, 2010.
10.310.1 Letter Agreement, dated January 9, 2010, including the Securities Purchase Agreement  — Standard Terms attached thereto, between the Registrant and the United States Department of the Treasury is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2010.
10.2  The Registrant’s 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
10.410.3  The Registrant’s 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
10.5 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPS”) areThe Registrant’s Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.2006.
10.6The Registrant’s Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.7 Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Anthony C. Weagley, effective as of January 1, 20072008 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.April 22, 2008.
10.810.7  Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Lori A. Wunder, effective as of January 1, 2007 is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007. See also Exhibit 10.27.
10.910.8  A change in control agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Charles E. Nunn, Jr.,A. Richard Abrahamian, effective as of January 1, 2007,February 19, 2008, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5Exhibit 10.2 to the RegistrantsRegistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.April 22, 2008.
10.1010.9  Directors’ Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.11
Exhibit
No.		Description
10.10 Center Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
10.1210.11 Registrant’s Placement Agreement dated December 12, 2003 with Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. to issue and sell $5 million aggregate liquidation amount of floating rate MMCapS(SM) Securities is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.1310.12 Indenture dated as of December 19, 2003, between the Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company relating to $5.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate debentures is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.1410.13 Amended and restated Declaration of Trust of Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.1510.14 Guarantee agreementAgreement between Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.16 Senior Officer Protection PlanForm of Waiver, executed by each of Lori A. Wunder, A. Richard Abrahamian, Ronald M. Shapiro, William J. Boylan and Anthony C. Weagley is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of10.2 to the Registrant’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.8-K dated January 13, 2009.
10.17 Intentionally omitted.Form of Executive Waiver Agreement, executed by each of Lori A. Wunder, A. Richard Abrahamian, Ronald M. Shapiro, William J. Boylan and Anthony C. Weagley is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2009
10.18 Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 29, 2004, relating to securities issued in a
September 2004 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2004.
10.19 The Registrant’s Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, is
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 5, 2008.
10.20 Amended and restated Employment Agreementemployment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Julie D’Aloia, effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibitExhibit 10.20 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. See also Exhibit 10.25.
10.21 Amended and restated employmentEmployment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Mark S. Cardone, effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants currentRegistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007. See also Exhibit 10.26.
10.22Intentionally omitted.
10.23 Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, relating to securities issued in a June 2005 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2005.
10.24Change in control agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Christopher M. Gorey, dated as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.2510.23 Open Market Share Purchase Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to
registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2006.
10.2610.24 Deferred Compensation Plan. IsPlan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.2710.25 Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Julie D’Aloia, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

10.28
Exhibit
No.		Description
10.26 Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Mark Cardone, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.

55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
10.2910.27 Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John F. McGowan, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.30Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Lori A. Wunder, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.3110.28 Amendment to Change in Control Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary Bank, and ChristopherRonald M. Gorey, dated December 3, 2007,Shapiro is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.510.28 to the Registrant’s CurrentAnnual Report on Form 8-K dated10-K for the year ended December 20, 2007.31, 2008.
11.1 Statement regarding computation of per share earnings is omitted because the computation can be clearly determined from the material incorporated by reference in this Report.
12.1 Statement of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
14.1 Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
16.1Letter from KPMG LLP dated May 16, 2006 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
23.2Consent of KPMG LLP
24.1Power of Attorney.
31.1 Personal certification of the chief executive officer andpursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Personal certification of the acting chief financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Personal certification of the chief executive officer andpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Personal certification of the acting chief financial officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 111 (b) (4) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
99.3  Code of conductConduct is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
c.(c)Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are either inapplicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

56


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Center Bancorp, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
 CENTER BANCORP, INC.
March 14, 200816, 2010 

By: /s/

/s/ Anthony C. Weagley

Anthony C. Weagley
President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the Registrant, in the capacities described below on March 14, 2008,16, 2010, have signed this report below.

 
/s/ Alexander A. Bol*

Alexander A. Bol
Director and 		Chairman of the Board/s/ Hugo Barth, III*

Hugo Barth, III
Director
/s/ Brenda Curtis*

Brenda Curtis
Director		 Director
/s/ John Delaney*J. DeLaney, Jr.*

John J. DeLaney,
Jr.		Director
/s/ James J. Kennedy*

James J. Kennedy
Director		 Director
/s/ Paul Lomakin, Jr.*Howard Kent*

Paul Lomakin, Jr.Howard Kent		Director
/s/ Elliot I. Kramer*

Elliot I. Kramer		Director
/s/ Nicolas Minoia*

Nicholas Minoia		Director
/s/ Harold Schechter*

Harold Schechter		Director
/s/ Lawrence B. Seidman*

Lawrence B. Seidman
Director		 /s/ Herbert Schiller*

Herbert Schiller
Director
/s/ Harold Schechter*

Harold Schechter
Director		/s/ William A. Thompson*

William A. Thompson
Director
/s/ Raymond Vanaria*

Raymond Vanaria
Director		 Director
/s/ Anthony C. Weagley

Anthony C. Weagley		President and Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

* /s/ Anthony C. Weagley

Anthony C. Weagley
Attorney-in-Fact

By:

/s/ Anthony C. Weagley

Anthony C. Weagley
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting and Financial Officer)Attorney-in-fact

72

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CENTER BANCORP, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.Description
 3.1Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.
 3.2By-Laws of the Registrant is incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
10.1Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John F. McGowan, effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.2Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John J. Davis effective January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.
10.3The Registrant’s 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
10.4The Registrant’s 1993 Outside Director Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
10.5Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (“SERPS”) are incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994.
10.6The Registrant’s Annual Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.7Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Anthony C. Weagley, effective as of January 1, 2007 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.
10.8Amended and restated employment agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Lori A. Wunder, effective as of January 1, 2007 is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.
10.9A change in control agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Charles E. Nunn, Jr., effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.5 the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.
10.10Directors’ Retirement Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
10.11Center Bancorp, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1999.
10.12Registrant’s Placement Agreement dated December 12, 2003 with Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. to issue and sell $5 million aggregate liquidation amount of floating rate MMCapS(SM) Securities is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.13Indenture dated as of December 19, 2003, between the Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company relating to $5.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating rate debentures is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.14Amended and restated Declaration of Trust of Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
10.15Guarantee agreement between Registrant and Wilmington Trust Company dated as of December 19, 2003 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.16Senior Officer Protection Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
10.17Intentionally omitted.
10.18Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 29, 2004, relating to securities issued in a
September 2004 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2004.
10.19The Registrant’s Amended and Restated 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 5, 2008.
10.20Amended and restated Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Julie D’Aloia, effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 to the
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.21Amended and restated employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Mark S. Cardone, effective as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007.
10.22Intentionally omitted.
10.23Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, relating to securities issued in a June 2005 private placement of securities, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2005.
10.24Change in control agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Christopher M. Gorey, dated as of January 1, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.25Open Market Share Purchase Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to
registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2006.
10.26Deferred Compensation Plan. Is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
10.27Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and Julie D’Aloia, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.28Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Mark Cardone, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.29Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
John F. McGowan, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.30Amendment to Employment Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary and
Lori A. Wunder, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.
10.31Amendment to Change in Control Agreement among the Registrant, its bank subsidiary Bank, and Christopher M. Gorey, dated December 3, 2007, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2007.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
11.1Statement regarding computation of per share earnings is omitted because the computation can be clearly determined from the material incorporated by reference in this Report.
14.1Code of Ethics is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
16.1Letter from KPMG LLP dated May 16, 2006 is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Registrant’s current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006.
21.1Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
23.2Consent of KPMG LLP
24.1Power of Attorney.
31.1Personal certification of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Personal certification of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1Code of conduct is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.