U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 20082010
OR
o | ¨TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________ |
Commission file number: 000-16665
For the transition period from _______________ to _______________
| Commission file number: | 000─16665 | |
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
(Exact(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
| Utah | | 87-0426358 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | | |
533-535 West 27th Street New York, NY | | 10001 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number: (212) 864-4900
| Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: | None |
| Name of each Exchange on Which Registered: | None |
| Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: | Common Stock, $0.001 par value |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of the “large accelerated filer,” “accelerate filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer ¨ | Accelerated Filer ¨ |
| |
Non-Accelerated Filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Non-Accelerated Filer o Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o¨ No x
As of March 31, 2009,2011, there were 165,186,124 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding. Of these, 76,285,914
On June 30, 2010, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, 76,285,894 shares areof its common stock, $0.001 par value per share (its only class of voting or non-voting common equity), were held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The market value of securities held by non-affiliates is $228,857,those shares was $19,071,473, based on the closinglast sale price of $0.003 for$0.25 per share of the registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2008.that date. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each shareowner affiliated with a director have been excluded from this calculation because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of officer or affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Not Applicable
| Item Number and Caption | Page |
| | |
| 3 |
| | |
| 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 9 |
| | 9 |
| | 9 |
| | 13 |
| | |
| 13 |
| | 13 |
| | 14 |
| | 14 |
| | 19 |
| | 19 |
| | 20 |
| | 21 |
| | |
| 21 |
| | 21 |
| | 22 |
| | 24 |
| | 25 |
| | 27 |
| | |
| 28 |
| | 28 |
| Item Number and Caption | | Page |
| Forward-Looking Statements | | 3 |
| | | | |
| PART I | | 3 |
| 1. | Business | | 3 |
| 1A. | Risk Factors | | 9 |
| 1B | Unresolved Staff Comments | | 9 |
| 2. | Properties | | 9 |
| 3. | Legal Proceedings | | 9 |
| 4. | (Removed and Reserved) | | 13 |
| | | | |
| PART II | | 13 |
| 5. | Market For Common Equity And Related Stockholder Matters | | 13 |
| 6. | Selected Financial Data | | 14 |
| 7. | Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations | | 14 |
| 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | 18 |
| 8. | Financial Statements And Supplemental Data | | 18 |
| 9. | Changes In And Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting And Financial Disclosure | | 18 |
| 9A. | Controls And Procedures | | 18 |
| 9B. | Other Information | | 20 |
| | | | |
| PART III | | 20 |
| 10. | Directors, Executive Officers And Corporate Governance | | 20 |
| 11. | Executive Compensation | | 22 |
| 12. | Security Ownership Of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management | | 23 |
| 13. | Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence | | 25 |
| 14. | Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees And Services | | 26 |
| | | | |
| PART IV | | 27 |
| 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules | | 27 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).statements. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, statements regarding our business strategy, future revenues and anticipated costs and expenses. Such forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements including the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar language. Our actual results may differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the sections “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business”. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances taking place after the date of this document.
Overview
Scores Holding Company, Inc. (‘(“Scores,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was incorporated in Utah on September 21, 1981 under the name Adonis Energy, Inc. Since 2003, we have been in the business of licensing the “Scores” trademarks and other intellectual property to fine gentlemen’s nightclubs with adult entertainment in the United States. These clubs feature topless female entertainers together with opportunities for watching sporting events celebrating business transactionsand corporate and private parties. There are threefour such clubs currently operating under the Scores name, in New York City, Baltimore, Chicago, and New Orleans.
Our trademarks and copyrights surrounding the Scores trade name are critical to the success and potential growth of our business. Our trademarks are held by our wholly owned subsidiary, Scores Licensing Corp. (“SLC”).
History and Development of our Business
On March 31, 2003, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Master License Agreement (the “MLA”) by and between us and our former affiliate, Entertainment Management Services, Inc. ("EMS"), an entity owned by two of our former directors and employees, we granted EMS an exclusive, worldwide renewable 20 year license in our property to sublicense the Scores trade name to nightclubs (the “Licensing Rights”). Under the MLA, EMS was required to pay us 100% of the royalties EMS received from the formerly affiliated clubs (defined below) and 50% of the royalties received from non-affiliated clubs (the “Royalty Rights”). These clubs had license agreements with EMS pursuant to which they typically paid EMS approximately 4.99% of their gross revenues from operations, including the sale of merchandise. We depended on these royalties to operate our business and as our principal source of revenue.
On January 27, 2009 (as further discussed below), we terminated the MLA with EMS and EMS transferred to us all of the Licensing Rights and Royalty Rights. Since termination of the MLA, our property is licensed directly by us to the three remaining clubs that previously had been sublicensing our property from EMS, and, thus, as of January 27, 2009, we are receiving 100% of the royalty payments made by these clubs rather than the 50% we were entitled to under the MLA.
WeUntil January 27, 2009, we were under common control with two previously existing nightclubs in New York, New York (“Scores East” and “Scores West”) which were owned, respectively, by 333 East 60th Street, Inc. (“333”), and Go West Entertainment, Inc. (“Go West”). EMS is also owned by 333. Through EMS, we had sublicense agreements with each of Scores East and Scores West pursuant to which they were entitled to use the Scores intellectual property. (Throughout this report, we refer to Scores East and Scores West as our “formerly affiliated clubs.” All other clubs with the exception of our newly opened club in New York, Scores New York (see discussion below), are referred to as non-affiliated clubs or as licensees (or sublicensees, as applicable), a term that may include the formerly affiliated clubs when the context requires.)
On January 27, 2009, Mitchell’s East LLC, wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, acquired a majority interest in our outstanding capital stock1. Mr. Gans is the majority owner of I.M. Operating LLC (“IMO”). IMO has a licensing agreement with us and has commenced operations in New York, New York under the club name Scores New York. (Throughout this report, we refer to Scores New York as our “affiliated club.”)
Termination of our Contract with EMS
On January 27, 2009, following the execution of a transfer agreement dated December 9, 2008, the Company and EMS completed the transfer (the “Transfer”) from EMS to us of all licensing and royalty rights originally granted to EMS under MLA1 and the MLA was cancelled. Pursuant to the terms of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among EMS, 333 and us dated January 27, 2009 (the “Assignment Agreement”), EMS assigned to us the Licensing Rights and the Royalty Rights relating to the existing sublicensees, free and clear of any charges, liens or other encumbrances. In consideration of these assignments, we credited 333 with a $600,000 payment against a $1,220,475 unpaid royalty debt owed by 333 to us (the “Debt”) and provided 333 with an acknowledgement that the Debt was satisfied to the extent of the $600,000 payment. Additionally, as part of the Transfer, we, EMS and 333 cancelled the MLA and terminated all of the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder.
| 1. | As further discussed in our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 2, 2009. |
Change in our Ownership
On January 27, 2009, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (the “SPA”), Mitchell’s East LLC (“Buyer”), a New York limited liability company wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, purchased an aggregate of 88,900,230 shares (the “Owned Shares”) of our common stock beneficially owned by Richard Goldring and Elliot Osher (collectively the “Share Sellers”), as well as any rights Harvey Osher (the Share Sellers and Harvey Osher, together, the “Sellers”) may have in 13,886,059 shares of our common stock (the “Decedent Owned Shares”) currently held of record by the estate of William Osher, deceased, and any rights the Sellers may have in an additional 2,400,001 shares of our common stock (the “Expectancy Shares”)1. Under the terms of the SPA, Harvey Osher is to deliver to the Buyer the Decedent Owned Shares that he may receive and the Sellers are to deliver to the Buyer any shares of the Company underlying the Expectancy Shares that any such Seller may receive. Additionally, pursuant to the SPA, each of the Sellers granted to Buyer
1. | As further discussed in our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 2, 2009. |
an irrevocable proxy enabling Buyer to act as his proxy with respect to any shares underlying the Decedent Owned Shares and the Expectancy Shares, as applicable.
The Owned Shares represent approximately fifty four percent (54%) of our outstanding capital stock and the Owned Shares together with the Decedent Owned Shares represent approximately sixty two percent (62%) of our outstanding capital stock.
Changes in our Management
On August 6, 2010, we appointed Robert M. Gans as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board. Robert Gans and Martin Gans, one of our existing Board members, are brothers. Also on August 6, 2010, we appointed Howard Rosenbluth as our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Rosenbluth is also a director.
Nightclubs Currently Licensing our Scores Brand
In 2003, EMS licensed the use of the "Scores Chicago" name to Stone Park Entertainment, Inc. for its club in Chicago, Illinois. Royalties payable to EMS wereunder this license are the greater of $2,500 per week or 4.99% of the the Chicago club’s gross revenues (less $25,000 per week) earned at that location. This nightclubThe Chicago club accounted for 33%21% and 18%23% of our total royalty revenues during 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.
In 2004, EMS licensed the use of "Scores Baltimore" to Club 2000 Eastern Avenue, Inc. for its nightclub in Baltimore, Maryland. Royalties payable to EMS wereunder this license are the greater of $1,000 per week or 4.99% of gross revenues. ThisThe Baltimore club accounted for 25%26% and 15%27% of our total royalty revenues in 20082010 and 2007,2009, respectively.
In April 2007, EMS licensed the use of the Scores brand name to Silver Bourbon, Inc. for a night club in New Orleans, Louisiana.Louisiana “Score New Orleans”. Royalties payable under this license are capped at the greater of $4,000 per month or 4.99% of gross revenues. ThisThe New Orleans club commenced operations in April 2007 and accounted for 10%12% and 3%10% of our total royalty revenues during 2008each of 2010 and 2007,2009, respectively.
The agreementAssignment Agreement between us and EMS dated January 27, 2009, terminated the MLA and, since that date, we have begun to retain 100% of the royalty payments received from each of these clubs whichclubs. This percentage includes the 50% which was previously retained by EMS under the MLA.
On January 27, 2009, we entered into a licensing agreement with I.M. Operating LLC (“IMO”)IMO for the use of the Scores brand name.name “Scores New York”. IMO is also owned in the majority by Robert M. Gans.Gans who is also our majority shareholder. The address where IMO’s plans to open an adult nightclub under the Scores trade namenew club is located is the same address as that of the former Scores West nightclub, 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY (the “West 27th Street Building”). Royalties payable to us under this license agreement have been set at 3% of gross revenues.revenues of Scores New York. Scores New York commenced operations in May 2009 and has accounted for 30% of our total royalty revenue during 2010 and 40% of our total royalty revenue during 2009. The West 27th Street Building is owned by Westside Realty of New York of which(“WSR”). Robert M. Gans is the majority owner is Robert M. Gans. IMO has applied for andof WSR.
On September 30, 2010, we entered into a licensing agreement with Tampa Food & Entertainment, Inc. Upon signing the contract, we received a liquornon-refundable fee. For the first twelve months of the contract we will receive a flat fee of per month with an advance payment to be made at the signing of the contract. After the first twelve months, royalties payable to us under this license for its proposed club andwill be capped at the club location is currently under renovation. We believegreater of a certain dollar amount per month or a percentage of net revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded $43,000 in revenue from this club will commence operations in April 2009.club.
Nightclubs Formerly Licensing our Scores Brand
Scores East was the first nightclub to sublicense our Scores brand through EMS. This nightclub surrendered its liquor license in December 2008 and closed its operations. Scores East accounted for 0% of our royalty revenue in 2008 and 2007.2009. Our second sublicensed nightclub, Scores West, had its liquor license revoked in 2008 and ceased operations. Scores West accounted for 0% of our royalty revenue in 2008 and 2007.2009. On April 18, 2008, Go West, the owner of Scores
West, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy. In 2008, we collected $14,788 and $35,928 in cash from Scores East and Scores West, respectively. (See Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Bad Debt Expense.)
In September 2004, EMS licensed our brand name to an adult nightclub in Lake Geneva, Wisconsin. That agreement was terminated as of May 30, 2007. As of December 31, 2008, we were owed $16,892 of unpaid royalties from that club, which amount we have reserved as a bad debt at December 31, 2006.
In January 2005, EMS licensed our Scores brand name to a former affiliate2, SMG Entertainment, Inc. (“SMG”), for SMG’s nightclub in North Miami, Florida. SMG terminated its agreement with EMS in December 2006 after it filed for bankruptcy. As of December 31, 2008, we were owed by EMS $16,661 of unpaid royalties from SMG. We reserved this amount as a bad debt as of December 31, 2006.
In July 2005, EMS licensed our Scores brand name to D.I. Food and Beverage (“DIF&B”) for DIF&B’s nightclub in Las Vegas, Nevada. Under this EMS sublicense agreement, DIF&B paid EMS $9,000 per week in royalties and $1,500 per month in related fees. This club accounted for 29% and 58% of our total royalty revenues in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Following notice to EMS, DIF&B canceled its sublicense with EMS effective May 6, 2008. This club accounted for 0% of our royalty revenue in 2009. DIF&B failed to make its final royalty payments to EMS and we and EMS have begun legal action against EMS to collect our fees due and related damages, as more fully discussed below.
In November 2005, EMS licensed the Scores brand name for a nightclub in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The ownership of that club did not receive local zoning approval and has opted to abandon its plans to open the club. In November 2006, EMS licensed the Scores brand name for a nightclub in Los Angeles, California. The ownership of that club could not obtain a liquor license and has opted to abandon its plans to open the club.
Scoreslive.com
On January 24, 2006, we entered into a licensing agreement with AYA International, Inc. (“AYA”) granting AYA the right to use our trademarks in connection with its online video chat website, “Scoreslive.com.” EMS was not a party to this license agreement. Our agreement with AYA provides for royalty payments to be made directly to us at the rate of 4.99% of weekly gross revenues from all revenue sources within the AYA website. The license continues for as long as the website is operational. Scoreslive.com debutedpiloted in January 2007. Because the ScoresliveScoreslive.com website is still in the development stage, it has accounted for a minimal amount of our total royalty revenues in 2009 and 2008. On December 21, 2009, AYA transferred all of its rights in Scoreslive.com and in its licensing agreement with us to date.Swan Media Group, Inc. (“SWG”), a newly formed New York corporation whose majority owner is Robert M. Gans.
2. | Richard Goldring owns, indirectly, 90% of SMG. |
Obligation to Richard GoldringBurhill LLC
On February 28, 2007,August 5, 2010, we entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Burhill LLC (the “Licensee”) pursuant to which the Licensee will license the Scores trademarks and create, distribute, advertise and promote programming content in all forms of media using the Scores trademarks and conducting business under the name “Scores.” The Licensee has agreed to pay us a non-refundable royalty equal to five percent (5%) of the revenues of the Licensee earned in connection with the Licensee’s use of the Scores trademarks, net of actual local sales taxes paid and including any and all licensing fees charged to third parties for the use of the programming content owned and/or distributed by the Licensee. The Licensee is wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, our then President and Chief Executive Officer Director and stockholder, Richard Goldring resigned from eachowner of his positions, and terminated his employment with us. Under the terms of his employment agreement dated March 31, 2003, we are obligated to pay Mr. Goldring a $1 million termination fee. Because ofMitchell’s East LLC, our lack of cash and other business related reasons, we have not paid Mr. Goldring this fee. We were negotiating a settlement with Mr. Goldring but we did not reach an agreement with him on the amount and terms of payment to be made to him and these negotiations are currently on hold.majority stockholder.
Competition
The adult nightclub entertainment business is highly competitive with respect to price, service, location and professionalism of its entertainment. Sublicensed clubs will compete with many locally-owned adult nightclubs. It is our belief, however, that only a few of these nightclubs have names that enjoy recognition and status that equal or approach that of Scores.to the Scores brand. For example, there are approximately 25twenty five (25) adult entertainment cabaret night clubs within the five boroughs of New York City; approximately six upscale located in New York City and approximately six located inthe borough of Manhattan. We believe that only three of these other venues in Manhattan, Ricks(Ricks Cabaret, Hustler and Penthouse, directly competed with our formerly affiliated clubs. Of the 25, these three providedPenthouse) provide the most comparablecompetitive adult entertainment experience to that of our formerly affiliated clubs. We expect this competitive analysis to remain the same with respect to the new Scores club that will open inbrand and our New York in the near future.affiliate. Other localeslocalities where our Scores’“Scores” brand is licensed clubs are situated have their ownsimilar competitive environments.
We believe that the combination of our name recognition and our distinctive entertainment environment allows our licensed clubslicensees to effectively compete within the industry, although we cannot assure youanyone that this will prove to be the case. The abilitysuccess of our licensed clubs to compete and succeed will also dependlicensees depends upon their ability to employ and retain top quality entertainers and employees. Competition for adult entertainers is intense. The failure of a Scores’ licensed club to retain quality entertainers, or superior restaurantemployees and barto provide customer service to their customers. The inability to sustain quality entertainers, employees and customer service could have a material or adverse impact on the ability of such clubour licensees to compete within the industry.
Competition among online adult entertainment providers is intense forin respect to both content and viewer spending. AYA’ssubscribers’ capital. SWG’s competition for its Scoreslive.com internet site varies in both the type and quality of offerings, but consists primarily of other premium pay services. The availability of, and price pressure from, more explicit content on the Internet, frequently offered for free, also presents a significant competitive challenge to AYA.SWG. The Internet is highly competitive, and Scoreslive.com will compete for visitors, subscribers, shoppers and advertisers. We believe that the primary competitive factors affecting AYA’sSWG’s Internet operations include brand recognition, the quality of content and products, pricing, ease of use and sales and marketing efforts. We believe that AYASWG and Scoreslive.com have the advantage of leveraging the power of our Scores brand across multiple media platforms.
Employees
At the present time, we have one (1) employeetwo (2) employees, who is not covered by any collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relationship with our current employee is satisfactory.
Government Regulation
Our licensees are subject to a variety of governmental regulations depending upon the laws of the jurisdictions in which they operate. The most significant governmental regulations are described below.
Liquor Licenses
Our licensees are subject to state and local licensing regulation of the sale of alcoholic beverages. We expect licensees to obtain and maintain appropriate licenses allowing them to sell liquor, beer and wine. Obtaining a liquor license may be a time consuming procedure. In New York, for example, a licensee must make an application to the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) for a liquor license regarding its proposed nightclub. The NYSLA has the authority, in its discretion, to issue or deny such a license request. The NYSLA typically requires local community board approval in connection with such grants. Approval is usually granted or denied within 90-120 days from the initial application date, but can take longer in certain circumstances. Other jurisdictions have their own procedures.
Present law in Los Angeles, California prohibits all adult entertainment cabaret venues with topless dancing from obtaining liquor licenses.
The liquor license for Scores West was suspended by the NYSLA in February 2007 and revoked in March 2008. The New York Appellate Court for the County of New York (the “Appellate Court”) confirmed the revocation in November 2008. Because of the common ownership between Scores West and Scores East, the NYSLA began proceedings to revoke the liquor license of Scores East. Scores East surrendered its liquor license in December 2008 and that club is no longer operating. The termination of both the Scores West and Scores East liquor licenses and the related closing of those clubs has had a material adverse effect on our business.
We cannot assure youoffer any assurance that our licensees will obtain liquor licenses or that, once obtained, they will be able to maintain their liquor licenses or be able to assign or transfer them if necessary. LicensesA license to sell alcoholic beverages must typically be renewed annuallyin many cases requires annual renewal and may be revoked or suspended for cause, including any regulatory violation by the nightclub operating the license or its employees. IfRoyalties for our business could decrease, if one or more of our current licensees failedfails to maintain aits liquor license, this would have a material adverse effect on our business and that of the licensee.license.
"Cabaret" Licenses
OurAlthough not a requirement, our licensees typically request although it may not be a requirement, a cabaret license in regards toconnection with the operationsoperation of their nightclubs. AlthoughCabaret licenses are not a requirement in all states; however, some states some mandate that
adult entertainment such licenses be obtained prior to the operation of an adult nightclub. For example, one of our formerly affiliated clubs requested andlicensees, was granted a cabaret license for itsa nightclub by the City of New York’s’York’s Department of Consumer Affairs (the "DCA"). In making its decision,response, the DCA determined that the proposed use met all zoning requirements and that the building was fit to operate the nightclub businessqualified for operations in accordance with the codes and standards. Although we expectstandards for a nightclub. We believe our licensees to havecomply with all regulatory laws regarding cabaret or an adult entertainment licenses in place as may be required by local law,license; however, there is no assurance that any suchof their licenses will remain effective or that they could be assigned or transferred if necessary. If one or more of our licensees failed to maintain a required license, this wouldcould have a material or adverse effect on our business.cash flow and profitability.
Zoning Restrictions
Adult entertainment establishments must comply with local zoning restrictions and these restrictionswhich can often be stringent. OneFor example, of stringent zoning regulations is thatin the City of New York City, which requiresmandate that an adult entertainment business that operatesmay operate in an area zoned as residential, or in areas that are commercially zoned, commercial that prohibits adult entertainment establishments not devoteand devotes more than either 40% or more of its space available to customers or 10,000 square feet for adult entertainment activities. Although we expect our licensees to operate within "zoned" areas, we cannot assure youmake any assurances that local zoning regulations will remain constant, or that if changed, our licensees will be able to continue operations under our Scores brand name trademark. If zoning regulations were to restrict the operations of one or more of our licensees, this could have a material or adverse effect on our business.cash flow and profitability.
Not applicable.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
In July 2007, we began to lease from Go West, on a temporary, month-to-month basis, approximately 700 square feet of office space located at the West 27th Street Building. As of July 1, 2008, we lease this space directly from Westside Realty of New York,WSR, the owner of the West 27th Street Building. The majority ownerBuilding, became the new lessor of Westside Realty is Robert M. Gans. We pay $5,000 per month, including overhead costs, for our office space.
As of July, 2007, we terminated our lease of approximately 500700 square feet of office space in White Plains, New York.occupancy at that location. On April 1, 2009, the monthly rent, which includes overhead cost, was reduced from $5,000 to $2,500.
On March 22, 2010, Russell Whelchel, who performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at the Scores West nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street, New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint on July 30, 2010. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal and New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with Scores West between May 2009 and February 13, 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages and injunctive relief. We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff, we contend that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather an independent contractor of Scores West and we deny all allegations seeking damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s complaint. We are currently engaged with the plaintiff in the exchange of discovery.
On March 16, 2010, Charles Braden, who claims he performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at the Scores New York nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street, New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal and New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with Scores New York between approximately January 2005 and September 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of the action and other relief as the S.D.N.Y. deems just and reasonable. We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff, we contend that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather an independent contractor of Scores West and we deny all allegations seeking damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s complaint.
In mid March 2010, we were named by Nichole Hughes in a complaint filed with the SCNY. Ms Hughes is suing us for an unspecified amount of damages in connection with an alleged unauthorized use of her image in our advertising materials. On June 20, 2010, we filed a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint, which was denied on December 17, 2010. We then filed an answer and affirmative defenses and a third party complaint against IMO, owner and operator of the club where Ms. Hughes was employed. The case is now in discovery. We will vigorously defend ourselves in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be material.
On January 14, 2010, we were named in a complaint filed with the SCNY in connection with an alleged assault on the plaintiff by an agent of our New York affiliated club. We filed a motion to dismiss this complaint and, on December 15, 2010, the plaintiff stipulated to discontinue the case against us.
On June 23, 2009, we filed a complaint with the SCNY against Silver Bourbon, Inc., our licensee in New Orleans and operator of Scores New Orleans, for breach of contract. At the time of the filing, Silber Bourbon, Inc. owed us $70,000 in unpaid royalties. We have settled this matter with Silver Bourbon, Inc. and the court action has been discontinued.
On September 5, 2008, Ruth Fowler, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West, filed a civil lawsuit against us in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for alleged illegal deductions take from her salary and monies due her and for sexual harassment under the New York City and New York State Human Rights Laws. On May 7, 2009, we filed a motion to dismiss the action against us but that motion was denied by the S.D.N.Y. with possible leave to renew the motion at a future date after the completion of discovery proceedings. In the meanwhile, counsel for plaintiff filed an amended complaint on February 26, 2010 to add as additional parties to the action Go West and EMS. On March 1, 2010, we filed affirmative defenses and an amended response asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS. On September 13, 2010, the SDNY denied plaintiff’s application for further discovery and on October 18, 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss, which has yet to be decided on. Although the outcome of this action is uncertain, we believe that any outcome will not have a material effect on us, since the plaintiff was only employed by Scores West for less than four months.
In early March 2008, we received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club, would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008. We were notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008, EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”), SCNY, on July 23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to EMS. This amount must be confirmedEMS and a default judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the SCNY in a final judgment. If such a judgment is rendered byClerk of the SCNY, weSCNY. We will attempt to collect on thethis judgment. We will be entitled to all monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement with EMS and 333.
On December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against us and Go West in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York,SCNY, alleging violations of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York City Administrative Code, based upon allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The lawsuit further alleges that at all material times both we and Go West were employers of Ms. Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages for plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future earnings and benefits, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of reputation. We dispute that we were an employer of the plaintiff and categorically deny all allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. We filed our verified answer in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12, 2008 to contest and defend against these accusations and we are currently engaged in discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy and the case iswas stayed. On July 23, 2009, the bankruptcy petition was dismissed and, as a result, the automatic stay was lifted. We subsequently filed an amended response asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS and a motion to compel discovery, which was approved. We are currently stayed.preparing for the plaintiff’s deposition and a compliance conference which are scheduled for the end of April.
On October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against us and other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M. Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws. On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint allegesalleged that we and the other defendants are “an integrated enterprise” and that we jointly employ the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the alleged wage/hour violations. We dispute that we violated the federal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously contest the claimed liability as well as the violations alleged. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf of ourselves and the other defendants we filed a motion to dismiss that portion of the Complaint that asserted State law class action allegations; we also moved to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; we opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the
motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers, cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On May 29, 2008, we filed an answer to plaintiffs’plaintiff's’ second amended complaint. Discovery into bothOn or about September 5, 2009, plaintiffs served their third amended complaint adding in two individual defendants who are alleged to be employers under the proceduralstate and substantive issues is ongoing, asfederal wage claims. We dispute that we are settlement negotiations.
In February 2007,a proper defendant in this action and we dispute that we violated the City of New York (the “City”) soughtfederal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the dancers are “employees” subject to close Scores West claiming that it presented a public nuisance. The City alleged that this nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution; the case was dismissed by the City of New Yorkfederal and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a reviewstate wage and hour laws. Two of the license held by Scores Westdefendants have been dismissed without prejudice and issued an Emergency Summary Orderwe have agreed upon a settlement amount of Suspension$450,000 that will be contributed among and between all of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West. After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed.remaining defendants. The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3, 2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go West.
On April 18, 2008, Go West filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followed the April 15, 2008 Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. As of the date hereof, an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has not been formed nor has a Trustee or Examiner been appointed in this case. Go West’s bankruptcy case is pendingsettlement documents are currently in the Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 08-11420. The United States Trustee in this case filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversionprocess of Go West’s Chapter 11 case as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the Bankruptcy Court and an order will be entered once Go West completes its stipulations with the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the payment of unpaid federal taxes) and the New York State Department of Taxation (regarding a payment plan for state taxes due).
Scores West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive any revenue from Scores West in 2008 or in 2007. Because Scores West has closed, the ability of Go West to
make payments under the Note (defined below) has been severely impaired. The Note is currently in default. See Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Bad Debt Expense.
On May 2, 2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was adjourned. 333 has since surrendered its liquor license for Scores East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not receive any revenue from Scores East in 2008 or in 2007.
On March 30, 2007, we, along with several of our affiliates, were named in a suit in connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of our stockholders and former officer and director. We have recently answered a third amended complaint and participated incompleted discovery. We have filed a Preliminary Conference to establishnote of issue with the discovery schedule. Examinations beforecourt and are waiting for a court date on which the trial of the parties have been completed and non-party depositions are now being taken. The plaintiff has not yet undergone the required physical examination.will begin. We will vigorously defend ourselves in this litigation and do not expect that the outcome will be material.
On December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise, which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in September 2008 under a plan or reorganization pursuant to which all general, unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to us.
On March 31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all "control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies, including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a “control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than 9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other securities of a company. The plea agreement resolved the DA's investigation against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his 76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr. Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as further discussed above.
In June 2005, we, together with several of our affiliates, commenced litigation regarding title to certain of our intellectual property. In February 2006, counterclaims were asserted and other persons brought third party complaints. In September 2006, we and our affiliates reached a settlement resolving all claims against us for a payment of $175,000 made in monthly installments. In return, the other parties in the litigation disclaimed any right to our intellectual property.
There are no other material legal proceedings pending to which we or any of our property are subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings threatened.
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders.PART II
Market Information.
Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “SCRH” since 2004. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal quarters indicated, the high and low closing bid prices per share of our common stock, as derived from quotations provided by Bloomberg L.P.OTC Markets Inc. Such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
| Quarter Ended | | High Bid | | | Low Bid | |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2007 | | | .027 | | | | .01 | |
| June 30, 2007 | | | .023 | | | | .009 | |
| September 30, 2007 | | | .011 | | | | .005 | |
| December 31, 2007 | | | .00981 | | | | .004 | |
| March 31, 2008 | | | .011 | | | | .002 | |
| June 30, 2008 | | | .01 | | | | .003 | |
| September 30, 2008 | | | .0045 | | | | .001 | |
| December 31, 2008 | | | .003 | | | | .0011 | |
| Quarter Ended | | High Bid | | Low Bid |
| March 31, 2009 | | .0035 | | .0005 |
| June 30, 2009 | | .025 | | .0011 |
| September 30, 2009 | | .035 | | .019 |
| December 31, 2009 | | .057 | | .0125 |
| March 31, 2010 | | .17 | | .044 |
| June 30, 2010 | | .081 | | .05 |
| September 30, 2010 | | .10 | | .056 |
| December 31, 2010 | | .07 | | .06 |
Holders
As of March 31, 2009,2011, there were approximately 579580 record holders of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared any cash dividends with respect to our common stock. Future payment of dividends is within the discretion of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. Although there are no material restrictions limiting, or that are likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our common stock, we presently intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our business and have no present intention to pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Securities Authorized For Issuance Underunder Equity Compensation Plans
None.On August 6, 2010, our Board of Directors and stockholders adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of both non-statutory and incentive stock options and other awards to acquire up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. If an incentive award granted under the 2010 Plan expires, terminates, is unexercised or is forfeited, or if any shares are surrendered to us in connection with an incentive award, the shares subject to such award and the surrendered shares will become available for further awards under the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2010, we have not issued any shares and there are no outstanding grants under the 2008 Plan.
Not applicable
Results of Operations:
For the year ended December 31, 20082010 (the “2008“2010 period”) compared to the year ended December 21, 20072009 (the “2007“2009 period”).
Revenues:
Revenues decreased 62%increased to $187,255$514,155 for the 20082010 period from $487,542$387,425 for the 20072009 period. This decreaseincrease was attributable primarily due to the following factors: The Las Vegas nightIn September 2010, our newly established Tampa club was sold in August 2008commenced operations and ceased licensing the Scores brand name. As a result, revenues from thatthis club declined 80%amounted to $54,000$43,000 during the 2010 period and $-0- during the 2009 period. Our operations are dependent upon royalties from our New York affiliated club which, in 2010, represented 30% of our total revenue. We license our brand to innovative and experienced operators who help sustain our brand by providing quality service to customers. We believe the combination of the club services provided by our existing operators and the opening of our newly established Tampa club contributed to the increase in the 20082010 and 2009 period revenues from our Chicago, Baltimore and New Orleans licensees. Revenues increased 23% to $106,987 in the 2010 period from $269,000$87,320 in the 2007 period. Additionally, the Chicago and Baltimore nightclubs experienced decreases in revenues due to the present unstable economic conditions - revenues decreased 27% to $62,118 in the 2008 period from $84,765 in the 20072009 period for the Chicago club, and 34%27% to $45,830$133,751 in the 20082010 period from $69,252$105,358 in the 20072009 period for the Baltimore club. Revenuesclub and 62% to $60,000 in the 2010 period from our$37,000 in the 2009 period for the New Orleans nightclub increased 13% in the 2008 period from the 2007 period. Our Lake Geneva, Wisconsin club ceased its operations in mid 2007. Revenues from the Lake Geneva club amounted to $0 and $22,500 for the 2008 and 2007 periods, respectively.club.
During the 2008 period, we did not record any royalty revenue from our formerly affiliated clubs (see Bad Debt Expense below). Royalty revenues for the 2008 period from our non-affiliate clubs in Las Vegas, Chicago, Baltimore and New Orleans accounted for 29%, 33%, 25% and 10% of those revenues, respectively.
In January 2007, AYA’sthe website, Scoreslive.com, began a developmental test launch of its operations and, for the 20072010 and 20082009 periods, generated gross revenues of more thanapproximately $5,000 per month resulting in minimal royalties to us. We believe that the Scoreslive.com website will remain in development mode during 2009,2011, continuing to generate minimal revenues for us.
We recognize revenues as they are earned, not as they are collected.
Bad Debt Expense
As of December 31, 2008, Scores East and Scores West2010, our New Orleans licensees owed us (indirectly, through EMS) $615,476 and $184,768, respectively,$14,000 in accrued and unpaid royalties. We have decidedDuring the 2010 period, management agreed to write off these amounts based on the NYSLA’s revocation of the Scores West liquor license and the subsequent permanent closing of that club and the related Scores East surrender of its liquor license and the permanent closing of that club. Additionally, in connection with Go West’s construction of the Scores West club, we loaned Go West $1,636,264 in exchange for a promissory note from Go West (the “Note”). The Note has not been repaid and, as of December 31, 2008, $1,867,310 (including accrued interest) remained due under the Note. As of December 31, 2006, we reserved the entire $1,867,310, of the Note plus interest, as a bad debt expense. As of the 2007 period, we began forgoing interest on the Note.
Any cash received from the owners of our formerly affiliated clubs (Scores East and Scores West) has been applied as a reversal of the bad debt expense when received. In 2008, we reversed bad debt expense incontinue to reserve the amount of $35,928 for cash collected from Scores West and $614,788 for cash collected from Scores East. This later amount included $14,788 in cash and
$600,000 deemed paid to EMS (owner of Scores East) in consideration ofowed by our repurchase from EMS of all Licensing Rights and Royalty Rights under the MLA.New Orleans licensee.
Operating Expenses:
Operating expenses decreasedfor the 2010 period and the 2009 period were $1,165,503 and $547,223, respectively. These expenses were directly related to the maintenance of the corporate entity and regulatory filing of periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) To comply with the requirements of Sarbanes Oxley, we expect these regulatory costs to increase in future years. Virtually all or 87% of the increase in operating expenses can be attributed to legal fees which increased $526,109, largely attributed to the class action lawsuit initiated under the prior management of the Company (S.Diaz, et al. v. Scores Holding Company Inc.) and the accrual of $450,000 for the estimated settlement of this case. Our business development and other executive administrative costs changed modestly during the 2008 period to $422,873 from $773,025 during the 2007 period. Because of the termination in 2008 of the sublicense between EMS and DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club, and the significant reduction in royalties received from our other licensees, we had to reduce our administrative costs significantly to match the related short fall in our revenue for the year. Our revenues from the Las Vegas club as a percentage of our total royalty revenues decreased to 29% in the 2008 period from 58% in the 2007 period and, as a result, we reduced our rent, salaries, legal, public relations and business development costs by approximately $350,000 in the 20082010 period from the 2007 period.2009 period, but is expected to increase in future periods due to expansion of our brand into emerging markets. Our current year amortization of the intangible assets of $116,703 will decrease next year to $88,000 as next year is the final year of such asset being amortized.
Provision for Income Taxes:
The provision for state income taxes relates primarily to the greater of average assets and capital taxable income. The average assets and capital arewhich were not impacted by nextnet operating losses.
Net Income (Loss) (per share):
Our net incomeloss for the 2008 period2010 year end was $131,122$(651,348) or $0.00$(0.00) per share versus a net (loss)loss of $(356,429)$(158,362) or $(0.00) per share for the 2007 period.2009 year end. During the 2010 period, our $126,730 increase in revenues was offset by costs primarily by the potential settlement of the S.Diaz, et al. v. Scores Holding Company Inc. and ongoing legal costs aggregating to $5 and secondarily related to business development, regulatory report preparation and filing, salaries, legal, amortization and taxes, which approximated to $521,000. This material change from a net (loss) to a net income from the 20072009 period to the 20082010 period can be attributed, primarily, to the reduction by $350,000 in our administrative costs in the 2008 period, as a result of our decrease in revenue from the Las Vegas club, and the reversal of bad debt for Scores East in the amount of $600,000, as a result of our repurchase from EMS of rights under the MLA. Additionally, as a result of our belief that the carrying amount of the Scores trademark exceeded its fair or net present value for the 2008 period, we recognized and recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $281,216 for the 2008 period. We based this impairment loss on the various adverse implications resulting from the permanent closing of the Scores East and Scores West clubs.
Net income per share data for both the 2008 and 2007 periods is based on net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average of the common shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2008,2010, we had $173$23,748 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $173$31,694 in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2007.2009.
On February 28, 2007, our then President, Chief Executive Officer, Director and majority stockholder, Richard Goldring resigned from each of his positions, and terminated his employment with us. Under the terms of his employment agreement dated March 31, 2003, we arewere obligated to pay Mr. Goldring a $1 million termination fee.fee (the “Termination Fee”). Because of our lack of cash and other business related reasons, we havedid not paidpay Mr. Goldring this fee We were negotiating a
settlement withthe Termination Fee. On May 10, 2009 Mr. Goldring butassigned his right, title and interest in and to the Termination Fee to Robert M. Gans. As further discussed below, we diddo not reach an agreement with him on the amount and terms ofexpect Mr. Gans to require from us payment to be made to him and these negotiations are currently on hold.
In 2006, we reserved a bad debt expense of approximately $3.4 million in recognition of the impaired ability of Go West and 333 to pay royalties due us with respect to Scores West and Scores East, respectively, and of Go West to make payments to us under the Note. See - Bad Debt Expense.Termination Fee.
Scores West accounted for 0% of our royalty revenue in both 2008 and 2007. As of December 31, 2008, Scores West owed us $184,768 in unpaid royalties that will not be paid because that club lost its liquor license and has permanently closed.
In connection with our divestiture of stock of Go West, we loaned Go West $1,636,264 in return for the Note secured by Go West’s leasehold interest on the West 27th Street Building. The Note bore interest at 7% and was scheduled for maturity on October 1, 2008. Go West is currently in default under the Note, and as at December 31, 2008 owed us $1,867,310 which includes accrued interest of $355,189. We did not receive any interest payments on the Note during the 2008 period. Since April 18, 2008, Scores West has been in bankruptcy and its ability to make payments under the Note has ceased.
Scores East, accounted for 0% of our royalty revenue in both 2008 and 2007 respectively. As of December 31, 2008, Scores East owed us $615,476 in royalties. This balance is net of (i) approximately $14,788 in cash received from Scores East and applied against royalty payments due and (ii) $600,000 in credits that were offset against royalties due from Scores East. This offset was the result of our purchase of the Royalty Rights and Licensing Rights under the MLA from EMS. During the 2008 period, we retained approximately $146,682 in cash royalties received directly from our Chicago non-affiliated club but due to EMS under the terms of the MLA. We retained that amount rather than remitting it to EMS to help cover our shortfalls in cash flow. As a result of the Transfer and the related Assignment Agreement, we applied the $146,682 against the outstanding royalties we owed to EMS as of December 31, 2008.
We have incurred losses since the inception of our business. Since our inception, we have been dependent on funding from private lenders and investors to conduct operations. As of December 31, 20082010 we had an accumulated deficit of $(5,971,761)$(6,781,471). As of December 31, 2008,2010, we had total current assets of $14,018$117,821 and total current liabilities of $155,808$824,714 or negative working capital of $(141,790)$(706,893). As of December 31, 2007,2009, we had total current assets of $47,213$58,426 and total current liabilities of $207,743$230,674 or negative working capital of $(160,530)$(172,248). The increase in the amount of ournegative working capital has been primarily attributable to our inability to collect on the outstanding receivables due from our formerly affiliated clubs, Score East and Scores West. As of December 31, 2008, both of these clubs have permanently closed and cash to extinguish the outstanding royalties due from these clubs will not be available for payment to us from them or their owners, 333 and Go West, respectively. Given our lack of cash, we were able to control our outstanding debt during the 2008 period by making significant reductionsincrease in our administrative costs.
related party activity and additional litigation related to our settlement case. During the 2010 period, the Company decreased its cash position due to additional litigation which was offset due to our increase in royalty revenue. We presently do not have any available credit, bank financing or other external sources of liquidity to fund our operations. We will need to obtain additional capital in order to meet our working needs and to continue to execute our business plan, build our operations and become profitable. In order to obtain capital, we may need to sell additional shares of our Common Stockcommon stock or debt securities, or borrow funds from private or institutional lenders. Because of recent problems in the credit markets, steep stock market declines, financial institution failures and government bail-outs, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional funding as necessary, we may have to suspend our operations temporarily or cease operations entirely.
We will continue to evaluate possible acquisitions of or investments in businesses, products and technologies that are complimentary to ours. These may require the use of cash, which would also require us to seek financing. We may sell equity or debt securities or seek credit facilities to fund acquisition-related or other business costs. Sales of equity or convertible debt securities would result in additional dilution to our stockholders. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our adult entertainment licensing business.
Compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley
The amount of royalties owed to us from our formerly affiliated nightclubs, Scores East and Scores West, and including our formerly affiliated nightclub in North Miami, Florida, during 2008 totaled $816,905. The amount owed at December 31, 2007 was $1,467,226. Cash received as partial payment on these receivables during the 2008 period and the 2007 period totaled $50,715 and $73,250, respectively.amounted to $50,715. We received no payments of principal or interest on the Note during these periods.
As we and our formerly affiliated clubs and the North Miami club were under common control until January 27, 2009, we are mindful that those royalties’ receivables could have taken on the appearance of prohibited loans under Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We do not believe, however, that these receivables were prohibited loans as we exercised our best commercial efforts to reduce the amount due under these receivables.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure on contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are limited to those described below. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies see note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues for the 20082010 period and the 20072009 period were derived predominately from royalties. We apply judgment to ensure that the criteria for recognizing revenues are consistently applied and achieved for all recognized sales transactions.
Long-Lived Assets (including Tangible and Intangible Assets)
We acquired the “Scores” trademark to market and conduct a global business strategy. Such costs affected the amount of future period amortization expense and impairment expense that we incur and record as cost of sales. The determination of the value of such intangible assets requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. We assess potential impairment to the intangible and tangible assets on a quarterly basis or when evidence, events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recovered. Related costs affect the amount of future period amortization expense and impairment expense that we incur and record as cost of sales. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators and future cash flows related to these assets are based on operational performance of our business, market conditions and other factors. Future events could cause us conclude that impairment indicators exist and that other tangible or intangible assets is impaired.
Accounting for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes. ManagementProfessional judgment is required by management in determining ourestimating a provision offor our deferred tax asset. We recordedBecause the Company consistently incurred net losses in prior years, a valuation for the full deferred tax asset from ourwas recorded based on carry forwards of such net operating losses carried forwardlosses. This was due to the Company not demonstrating any consistent profitable operations. In the event that the actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods we may need to adjust such valuation recorded.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not Aapplicable.
Our audited consolidated financial statements as of, and for the years ended, December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 are included beginning immediately following the signature page to this report. See Item 15 for a list of the financial statements included herein.
Not applicable.
(a) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. The managementManagement of Scores Holding Company, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)). Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, consisting of Curtis Smith,Robert M. Gans, our acting chief executive officer, and Howard Rosenbluth, our chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our acting chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded, as of the Evaluation Date, that our disclosure controls and procedures arewere not sufficiently effective suchto ensure that the information relating to us required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our acting chief executive officer and chief financial officer and secretary, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In particular, we concluded that internal control weaknesses in our accounting policies and procedures relating to our segregation of duties were material weaknesses.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, our management used the criteria set forth in the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework and the Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies both issued by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Our management has identified the following material weaknesses.
| 1. | As of December 31, 2010, we did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting. For one, we did not have a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent directors on our board of directors. This lack of a functioning audit committee resulted in our having ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, and management concluded that it constituted a material weakness in our system of financial reporting. |
| 2. | As of December 31, 2010, we did not adequately segregate, or mitigate the risks associated with, incompatible functions among personnel to reduce the risk that a potential material misstatement of the financial statements would occur without being prevented or detected. Accordingly, management concluded that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness. |
Based on this evaluation ourand the material weaknesses identified, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2008,2010 our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective, based on the criteria established in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the COSO. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting wasmay not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective based on those criteria. The following material weaknesses were identified from our evaluation:can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Due to the small size and limited financial resources, the Company’s CFO and Acting CEO has been the only individual involved in the accounting and financial reporting functions for the Company. As a result, there is no segregation of duties within the accounting function, leaving all aspects of financial reporting and physical control of cash in the hands of the same individual. Usually, this lack of segregation of duties represents a material weakness; however, to remedy the matter, the Company retained accounting personnel who perform high end monthly accounting services. The CFO and members of the Board examine and approve all cash transactions and make inquiries to variances with respects to our new accounting personnel. We will continue to periodically review our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and make modifications from time to time considered necessary or desirable.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
PART III
On April 14th 2008, Elda Auerbach resigned from our Board of Directors. Ms. Auerbach’s esignation did not result from any disagreement between her and us.
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information, as of April 13, 2009,March 31, 2011, with respect to our sole directordirectors and executive officer.officers.
Directors serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders; until their successors are elected or appointed and qualified, or until their prior resignation or removal. Officers serve for such terms as determined by our boardBoard of directors.Directors. Each officer holds office until such officer’s successor is elected or appointed and qualified or until such officer’s earlier resignation or removal. No family relationships exist between any of our present directors and officers.
| Name | | Positions Held | | Age | | Date of Election or Appointment as Director |
| | | | | | | |
Curtis R. SmithRobert M. Gans | | Chief Financial Officer, ActingPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | 4067 | | September 26, 2006August 6, 2010 |
| | | | | | | |
| Martin Gans | | Director | | 75 | | June 23, 2009 |
| | | | | | |
| Howard Rosenbluth | | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director | | 64 | | April 21, 2009 |
The following is a brief account of the business experience during the past five years or more of our sole directors and executive officer.
Robert M. Gans: For the past forty two years Robert M. Gans has owned and operated companies in the building materials business, as well as gentlemens' clubs, restaurants, and several commercial and residential real estate properties. Mr. SmithGans has served as our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) since September 2006. Mr. Smitheither been the President, Managing Member, or sole owner of all of the companies in which he has been our Acting Chiefinvolved. None of the companies was or is a public company.
Martin Gans: Martin Gans has been retired since 2002. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gans held managerial positions with The Nassau County Board of Elections, from 1994 to 2002, and with the Metropolitan New York hospitals, from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Gans has an MBA in Health Care Administration from George Washington University and a Bachelor’s degree in Economics from Hunter College. Mr. Gans served in the United States Army where he reached the rank of SP4.
Robert Gans and Martin Gans are brothers.
Howard Rosenbluth: Over the past five years, Mr. Rosenbluth has been an executive officer overseeing the financial operations for Metropolitan Lumber Hardware and Building Supplies, Inc., and The Executive Officer since June 2007.Club LLC, a company operating in the Gentlemen’s' club industry. Mr. SmithRosenbluth received an MBA in Finance in 1975 from the University of Connecticut and has owned a consulting firm, a manufacturing company and a restaurant and has worked in public accounting and consulting for over 10 years and has a background in performing SEC audits and assisting in mergers and acquisitions for many public companies. Prior to serving as our CFO, he served as our controller for a year. He has served many years working with various public accounting firms performing high level audits of many public companies and offers a variety of solid SEC experience within the licensing industry. Mr. Smith earned his Bachelors degree in Science from Syracuse University and has been licensed as a public accountant since 1996.more than 35 years.
Board of Directors
None of our directors receivereceives any remuneration for acting as such. Directors may, however, be reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses, if any, for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees. No such committees have been appointedestablished to date. Accordingly, we do not have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert. Similarly, we do not have a nominating committee or a committee performing similar functions. We have not implemented procedures by which our security holders may recommend board nominees to us, but expect to do so in the future.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership on Form 3, reports of changes in ownership on Form 4 and annual reports concerning their ownership on Form 5. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
To the best of our knowledge, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,2010, none of our officers or directors failed to file a required report in a timely manner.on Form 3, Form 4 or Form 5.
Director Independence
We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors be “independent” and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our Board of Directors comprised of a majority of “Independent Directors.” Our current director who is also our sole officer is not independent.
Code of Ethics
Due to the scope of our current operations, as of December 31, 2008,2010, we have not adopted a code of ethics for financial executives, which include our principal executive officer, Chief Financial Officer or persons performing similar functions. Our decision to not adopt such a code of ethics results from our having only a limited number of officers and directors operating as management. We believe that as a result of the limited interaction which occurs having such a small management structure eliminates the current need for such a code.
The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid or accrued by us during the two fiscal years ended December 31, 20082010 to (i) all individuals that served as our
chief executive officer or acted in a similar capacity for us at any time during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010 and (ii) all individuals that served as executive officers of ours at any time during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010 that received annual compensation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20082010 in excess of $100,000.
Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compen- sation ($) | | | Change in Pension Value and Non- qualified Deferred Compen- sation Earnings ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | | Total ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | | | (i) | | | (j) | |
Robert M. Gans, Chief Executive Officer | | 2010 | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Curtis Smith, Acting | | 2010 | | | 93,880 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 93,880 | |
| Chief Executive | | 2009 | | | 105,731 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 105,731 | |
| Officer, Chief | | 2008 | | | 79,015 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 79,015 | |
| Financial Officer (2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | Salary ($) | | | Bonus ($) | | | Stock Awards ($) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compen-sation ($) | | | Change in Pension Value and Non-qualified Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($) | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | | Total ($) | |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | | | (i) | | | (j) | |
| Curtis Smith | | 2008 | | | 79,015 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 79,015 | |
| Acting Chief Executive Officer | | 2007 | | | 120,000 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 120,000 | |
| Chief Financial Officer (1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Robert M. Gans became our Chief Executive Officer on August 6, 2010. |
| (2) | Curtis Smith became our Chief Financial Officer on September 26, 2006 and Acting Chief Executive Officer on June 25, 2007. Mr. Smith resigned from both of these positions on June 15, 2010. |
The terms of Mr. Smith’s employment agreement with us are contractor based and are reviewed every year subject to Board approval.22
In October 2002, we granted non-incentive
We have not issued any stock options to two of our then officers and employees exercisable for 85,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
To present, we have notor maintained any stock option or other incentive plans sinceother than our inception.2010 Plan. (See “Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters – Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” above.) We have no other plans in place and have never maintained any plans that provide for the payment of retirement benefits or benefits that will be paid primarily following retirement including, but not limited to, tax qualified deferred benefit plans, supplemental executive retirement plans, tax-qualified deferred contribution plans and nonqualified deferred contribution plans.
Similarly, we have no contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements, whether written or unwritten, that provide for payments to the named executive officers or any other persons following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control of us or a change in a named executive officer’s responsibilities following a change in control.
Compensation of Directors
None of our directors receivereceives any compensation for serving as such, for serving on committees of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or for special assignments. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 there were no other arrangements between us and our directors that resulted in our making payments to any of our directors for any services provided to us by them as directors.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock known by us as of March 31, 20092011 by
· each person or entity known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock,
· each of our directors,
· each of our executive officers, and
· all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
The percentages in the table have been calculated on the basis of treating as outstanding for a particular person, all shares of our common stock outstanding on such date and all shares of our common stock issuable to such holder in the event of exercise of outstanding options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges owned by such person at said date which are exercisable within 60 days of such date. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent such power may be shared with a spouse. The addresses for our executive officers and directors are c/o Scores Holding Company, Inc., 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY 10001.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Title of Class | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | | | Percent of Class (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Curtis Smith | | Common Stock | | | - 0 - | | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Elda Auerbach | | Common Stock | | | - 0 - | | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (2 persons) | | Common Stock | | | - 0 - | | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Mitchell’s East LLC (2) 617 Eleventh Avenue New York, NY 10036 | | Common Stock | | | 88,900,230 | | | | 53.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Estate of William Osher (3) 2955 Shell Road Broklyn, NY | | Common Stock | | | 13,886,059 | | | | 8.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | | Title of Class | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | | | Percent of Class (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Robert M. Gans (2) | | Common Stock | | | 88,900,230 | | | | 53.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Howard Rosenbluth | | Common Stock | | | - 0 - | | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Martin Gans | | Common Stock | | | - 0 - | | | | 0.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| All directors and executive officers as a group (3 persons) | | Common Stock | | | 88,900,230 | | | | 53.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Mitchell’s East LLC (2) 617 Eleventh Avenue New York, NY 10036 | | Common Stock | | | 88,900,230 | | | | 53.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Estate of William Osher (3) 2955 Shell Road Broklyn, NY | | Common Stock | | | 13,886,059 | | | | 8.4 | % |
| (1) | Based upon 165,186,124 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as at March 31, 2009.2011. |
| (2) | Robert M. Gans is the sole owner of Mitchells East LLC. The principal business address of Mr. Gans is 617 Eleventh Avenue, New York, NY 10036. Does not include 13,886,059 shares of Common Stock currently held of record by William Osher, deceased, of which Harvey Osher (“H. Osher”) claims title and which. H. Osher has agreed to transfer to Mitchell’s East LLC pursuant to the SPA. |
| (3) | William Osher passed away in August, 2007. H. Osher claims all right and title to and interest in these shares of Common Stock and has agreed to transfer them to Mitchell’s East LLC pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. |
Changes in Control
Not Applicable.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Underunder Equity Compensation Plans
We do not presently maintain any equity compensation plansOn August 6, 2010, our Board of Directors and stockholders adopted the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan provides for the issuance of both non-statutory and incentive stock options and other awards to acquire up to 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2010, we have not maintainedissued any such plans since our inception.shares and there are no outstanding grants under the 2008 Plan.
Until January 27, 2009, Richard Goldring owned approximately 46% of our outstanding common stock untilstock. On January 27, 2009, when he sold all of his shares to Buyer, pursuant to the SPA. He resigned as our President, Chief Executive Officer and director on February 28, 2007.owned by Robert M. Gans. Elliot Osher owned approximately 8.8% of our common stock until January 27, 2009 when he sold all of his shares to Buyer pursuant to the SPA.Buyer. The estate of William Osher currently owns approximately 8.8% of our common stock. Harvey Osher claims ownership of those Decedent Owned Sharesshares and, pursuant to the SPA,as discussed above, has agreed to transfer them to Buyer (as discussed above).
Agreement with EMS
EMS is one third owned by each of Richard Goldring, Elliot Osher and Harvey Osher. On March 13, 2003, we entered into the MLA with EMS. Under the MLA, EMS was required to pay us 100% of the royalties received from the formerly affiliated clubs and 50% of the royalties received from non-affiliated clubs. The MLA had been amended in late 2006 to add a provision which stated that so long as a shareholder, officer or director of EMS served at the same time as an officer or director of ours, EMS would pay us 100% of the royalties it received from non-affiliated clubs. The revised MLA stated that this provision had always been the intention and practice of the parties. On February 28, 2007, this condition ceased to be fulfilled as Richard Goldring resigned as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director and, as a result, as of that date our receipt of royalties generated from non-affiliated clubs reverted to the 50% level.
Transactions with 333
333, the owner and operator of Scores East, is two thirds owned by Richard Goldring and one third owned by Elliot Osher. Both Richard Goldring and Elliot Osher were our stockholders until January 27, 2009. Richard Goldring was our President, Chief Executive Officer and director until his resignation on February 28, 2007. On October 1, 2003, EMS sublicensed our Scores trade name to 333 for the Scores East club. Royalties earned during the 2008 period and the 2007 period were foregone by us due to matters resulting in the Scores East surrender of its liquor license and related the closing of the Scores East club. Royalties owed to us by EMS relating to the Scores East sublicense at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were $615,478 and $1,230,263, respectively.
During the 2008 period, we retained approximately $146,682 in cash royalties received from our Chicago non-affiliated club. Pursuant to the MLA, we were obligated to remit this amount to EMS but we retained it to help cover our shortfalls in cash flow. As a result of the Transfer and related Assignment Agreement, we applied the $146,682 against the outstanding royalties balance we owed to EMS as of December 31, 2008.
Transactions with Go West
Two thirds of Go West is owned by Richard Goldring and one third by Elliot Osher.
On March 11, 2002, we entered into an acquisition agreement with Go West whereby it became our wholly owned subsidiary in exchange for common stock paid to its then stockholders, Richard Goldring, William Osher and Elliot Osher. On March 31, 2003, we engaged in a series of transactions designed to reverse this acquisition (the “Unwinding”). We transferred all of the capital stock of Go West to its former shareholders, who returned our stock to us. Immediately thereafter, Richard Goldring and William Osher entered into an agreement with EMS whereby they each exchanged their shares of Go West for shares of EMS (the “EMS Acquisition Agreement”). As a result, EMS owned 66.7% and Elliot Osher owned 33.3% of Go West's outstanding common stock. Richard Goldring and William Osher each owned 50% of EMS's outstanding common stock. On April 7, 2003 the EMS Acquisition Agreement was undone. EMS transferred 2,500,000 shares of Go West to Mr. Richard Goldring and 2,500,000 shares of Go West to William Osher.
Also, on March 31, 2003, EMS sublicensed the Scores trade name to Go West for its Scores West nightclub. Royalties earned during the 2008 period and the 2007 period were foregone by management due to matters which led to the revocation in 2008 of the Scores West liquor license by the NYSLA. Royalties owned to us by EMS relating to the Scores West sublicense at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 were $184,768 and $220,302, respectively.Buyer.
Obligations to Richard Goldring and Robert M. Gans
On February 28, 2007, our then President, Chief Executive Officer, Director and majority stockholder, Richard Goldring, resigned from each of his positions, and terminated his employment with us. Under the terms of his employment agreement dated March 31, 2003, we arewere obligated to pay Mr. Goldring a $1 million termination fee.Termination Fee. Because of our lack of cash and other business related reasons, we havedid not paidpay Mr. Goldring this fee We were negotiating a settlement withthe Termination Fee. On May 10, 2009 Mr. Goldring butassigned his right, title and interest in and to the Termination Fee to Robert M. Gans. On August 3, 2009, we did not reachfiled with the SCNY an Affidavit of Confession of Judgment acknowledging that we owe Mr. Gans the Termination Fee along with prejudgment interest at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum running from February 28, 2009 through August 3, 2009 (this interest together with the Termination Fee, the “Settlement Amount”). Also on August 3, 2009, we, SLC and Mr. Gans entered into a trademark security agreement with him onpursuant to which we and SLC granted Mr. Gans a first priority security interest in all of our trademark rights as security for the amounttimely and terms ofcomplete payment to be madeMr. Gans of the Settlement Amount. We do not expect, however, Mr. Gans to him and these negotiations are currently on hold.require from us payment of the Settlement Amount.
Executive Offices
Beginning July 1, 2004, we leased 2,400 square feet of office space in New York, New York, from Go West for our executive offices, paying $20,000 per month and offsetting this amount against royalties owed to us by Go West. On March 1, 2007, we terminated this lease. As of July 2007, we began to apply a monthly credit of $5,000 to the outstanding royalties owed to us by Go West relating to our occupancy, including overhead costs, on a temporary, month-to-month basis, of approximately 700 square feet of office space located at the West 27th Street Building.
As of July 1, 2008, we lease our 700 square feet of office space from Westside Realty of New York,WSR, the owner of the West 27th Street Building. The majority ownerBuilding, became the new lessor of Westside Realty is Robert M. Gans who purchasedour 700 square feet office occupancy at that location. On April 1, 2009, the stock of Westside Realtymonthly rent, which includes overhead cost, was reduced from Richard Goldring and Elliot Osher. We pay $5,000 on a month to month basis, including overhead costs, for this office space.$2,500.
Go West Construction LoanDirector Independence
Our Board of Directors has considered the independence of its directors in reference to the definition of “independent director” established by the Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2). In doing so, the Board has reviewed all commercial and other relationships of each director in making its determination as to the independence of its directors. After such review, the Board has determined that none of our directors qualifies as independent under the requirements of the Nasdaq listing standards.
In consideration of payments made by us on behalf of Go West for construction of Scores West, on March 31, 2003, Go West issued to us the Note. The Note was a five year promissory note for $1,636,264.08 which bore simple interest at a rate of 7% per year and was scheduled for maturity on October 1, 2008. Go West is in default under the Note. As of December 31, 2008, Go West owed us $1,867,310 under the Note, which includes $355,189 in accrued and unpaid interest. During the 2008 period and the 2007 period, $0 and $0 were paid in principal and interest on the Note, respectively. At the time, Go West’s primary asset was a 20-year lease on the West 27th Street Building where it built its nightclub, Scores West. The Note was secured by Go West’s leasehold interest in the West 27th Street Building. Go West has since relinquished its leasehold in the West 27th Street Building to Westside Realty of New York and we do not expect to collect on the Loan.
Audit Fees.
The aggregate fees billed to us by our principal accountant for services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 are set forth in the table below:
| Fee Category | | Fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 | | | Fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 | | | Fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 | | | Fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 | |
| Audit fees (1) | | $ | 20,000 | | | $ | 25,000 | | | $ | 18,000 | | | $ | 20,000 | |
| Audit-related fees (2) | | | 12,000 | | | | 15,000 | | | | 12,000 | | | | 12,000 | |
| Tax fees (3) | | | 3,000 | | | | 4,000 | | | | 3,000 | | | | 3,000 | |
| All other fees (4) | | | — | | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Total fees | | $ | 35,000 | | | $ | 44,000 | | | $ | 33,000 | | | $ | 35,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | Audit fees consists of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of consolidated financial statements, for reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements. |
| (2) | Audit-related fees consistsconsist of fees billed for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit fees.” |
| (3) | Tax fees consistsconsist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. |
| (4) | All other fees consistsconsist of fees billed for all other services. |
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Practice.
Inasmuch as we do not have an audit committee, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors performs the functions of an audit committee. Section 10A(i) of the Exchange prohibits our auditors from performing audit services for us as well as any services not considered to be “audit services” unless such services are pre-approved by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors (in lieu of the audit committee) or unless the services meet certain de minimisde-minims standards.
All audit services were approved by our Board of Directors.
PART IV
Financial Statement Schedules
The consolidated financial statements of Scores Holding Company, Inc. are listed on the Index to Financial Statements on this annual report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1.
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits
The following Exhibits are being filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
| | SEC Report Reference Number | | |
| 2.1 | | 2 | | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated June 22, 1998 between Olympus M.T.M. Corporation and The Internet Advisory Corporation (1) |
| 2.2 | | 10 | | Reorganization Agreement dated December 30, 1999 between The Internet Advisory Corporation and Richard Goldring (2) |
| 2.3 | | 99 | | Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement dated November 14, 2001 filed in Bankruptcy Court (3) |
| 2.4 | | 2.1 | | Acquisition Agreement dated March 11, 2002 among the Registrant Go West Entertainment, Inc., Richard Goldring, William Osher, and Elliott Osher (4) |
| 2.5 | | 2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 7, 2002 among HEIR Holding Company, Inc., Scores Acquisition Corp. and the Registrant (5) |
| 2.6 | | 2.1 | | Acquisition Agreement, dated March 31, 2003 among the Registrant, Go West Entertainment, Inc., Richard Goldring, William Osher, and Elliott Osher (6) |
| 2.7 | | 2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 12, 2004, among the Registrant, SCRH Acquisition Corp. and Aciem Management, Inc (7) |
| 2.8 | | 2.2 | | Amendment No. 1 to Acquisition Agreement, dated August 12, 2004, among the Registrant, Go West Entertainment, Inc., Richard Goldring, William Osher, and Elliott Osher (7) |
Exhibit No | | SEC Report Reference Number | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 10.1 | | 10.20 | | Stock Option Agreement dated October 22, 2002 between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (1) |
| | | | | |
| 10.2 | | 10.21 | | Stock Option Agreement dated October 22, 2002 between the Registrant and Elda Auerback (1) |
| | | | | |
| 10.3 | | 10.28 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated June 13, 2003, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Stone Park Entertainment (2) |
| | | | | |
| 10.4 | | 10.29 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated February 27, 2004, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Club 2000 Eastern Avenue, Inc. (2) |
| | | | | |
| 10.5 | | 10.38 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated January 24, 2006, between the Registrant and AYA Entertainment, Inc. (3) |
| | | | | |
| 10.6 | | 10.42 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Silver Bourbon, Inc. (3) |
| | | | | |
| 10.7 | | 10.1 | | Transfer Agreement by and among the Registrant, 333 East 60th Street Inc. (“333”) and Entertainment Management Services, Inc. (“EMS”) dated as of December 9, 2008 (4) |
| | | | | |
| 10.8 | | 10.2 | | Cancellation Agreement by and among the Registrant and EMS dated as of January 27, 2009 (4) |
| | | | | |
| 10.9 | | 10.3 | | Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among the Registrant, 333 and EMS dated as of January 27, 2009 (4) |
| | | | | |
| 10.10 | | 10.47 | | License Agreement, dated January 27, 2009, between the Registrant and I.M. Operating LLC (5) |
| 10.11 | | 10.1 | | License Agreement by and between the Registrant and Burhill LLC (6) |
| | | | | |
| 10.12 | | 10.2 | | Scores Holding Company, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (6) |
| | | | | |
| 10.13 | | 10.3 | | Form of Option Agreement for the 2010 Plan (6) |
| | | | | |
| 10.14 | | 10.4 | | Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement (6) |
| | | | | |
| 21 | | 21 | | Subsidiaries - As of December 31, 2010, we had one subsidiary: Scores Licensing Corp. |
| | | | | |
| 31.1 | | * | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | | |
| 31.2 | | * | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | | |
| 32.1 | | * | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** |
| | | | | |
| 32.2 | | * | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** |
| | SEC Report Reference Number | | |
| 10.1 | | | | License Agreement between HEIR Holding Company, Inc. and Go West Entertainment, Inc.* |
| 10.2 | | | | Amendment to License Agreement dated August 15, 2001* |
| 10.3 | | 10.1 | | Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreement dated August 7, 2002 between HEIR Holding Company, Inc. and HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd (8) |
| 10.4 | | 10.1 | | $1,000,000 Convertible Debenture Issued to HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd by HEIR Holding Company, Inc. (8) |
| 10.5 | | 10.3 | | Loan Agreement and Promissory Note dated August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd (8) |
| 10.6 | | 10.3 | | Promissory Note dated August 7, 2002 issued to HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd by the Registrant (8) |
| 10.7 | | 10.2 | | Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreement dated August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and HEM Mutual Assurance, LLC (8) |
| 10.8 | | 10.2 | | Termination Warrant dated August 7, 2002 issued to HEM Mutual Assurance, LLC by the Registrant, dated March 31, 2003 (8) |
| 10.9 | | 10.2 | | Special Registration Rights Agreement dated August 7, 2002 between the Registrant and HEM Mutual Assurance, LLC (8) |
| 10.10 | | 10.2 | | Modification of Loan and Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreements and Related Transaction Documents dated November 14, 2002 among the Registrant, HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd and HEM Mutual Assurance, LLC. (9) |
| 10.11 | | 10.3 | | Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement dated July 1, 2002 between the Registrant and Scores Entertainment, Inc. (9) |
| 10.12 | | 10.4 | | Warrant dated July 1, 2002 to Purchase 70,000 Shares of Common Stock of the Registrant(9) |
| 10.13 | | 10.1 | | Second Modification of Loan and Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreements and Related Transaction Documents, dated February 25, 2003, among the Registrant, HEM Mutual Assurance Fund, Ltd and HEM Mutual Assurance, LLC.(10) |
| 10.14 | | 10.1 | | Collateral Loan Agreement dated April 1, 2002 between the Registrant and Interauditing, Srl (11) |
| | SEC Report Reference Number | | |
| 10.15 | | 10.18 | | Advisory Agreement dated March 2003 among Maximum Ventures, Inc., Jackson Steinem, Inc. and the Registrant (12) |
| 10.16 | | 10.1 | | Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2002 between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (9) |
| 10.17 | | 10.20 | | Stock Option Agreement dated October 22, 2002 between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (12) |
| 10.18 | | 10.21 | | Stock Option Agreement dated October 22, 2002 between the Registrant and Elda Auerback (12) |
| 10.19 | | | | Promissory Note for $250,000 issued by the Registrant to Arnold Feldman * |
| 10.20 | | 10.1 | | Secured Promissory Note issued by Go West Entertainment, Inc. to the Registrant (6) |
| 10.21 | | 10.2 | | Master License Agreement, dated March 31, 2003 between the Registrant and Entertainment Management Services, Inc. (6) |
| 10.22 | | 10.3 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Go West Entertainment, Inc. (6) |
| 10.23 | | 10.4 | | Employment Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (6) |
| 10.24 | | 10.5 | | Amendment to Intellectual Property Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between the Registrant and Scores Entertainment, Inc. (6) |
| 10.25 | | 10.28 | | Loan Modification Agreement, dated December 16, 2003, between the Registrant and HEM Mutual Assurance Fund Limited (13) |
| 10.26 | | 2.1 | | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 12, 2004, between the Registrant, SCRH Acquisition Corp. and Aciem Management, Inc. (14) |
| 10.27 | | 10.32 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated March 31, 2003, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Go West Entertainment, Inc. (15) |
| 10.28 | | 10.28 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated June 13, 2003, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Stone Park Entertainment (15) |
| | SEC Report Reference Number | | |
| 10.29 | | 10.29 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated February 27, 2004, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Club 2000 Eastern Avenue, Inc. (15) |
| 10.30 | | 10.31 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated July 27, 2004, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and DBD Management, Inc. (15) |
| 10.31 | | 10.30 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated January 3, 2005, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and SMG Entertainment, Inc. (15) |
| 10.32 | | | | Sublicense Agreement, dated July 28, 2005, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and DDII, LLC. (22) |
| 10.33 | | 10.33 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated October 27, 2005, between the Registrant and D.I. Food & Beverage of Las Vegas (16) |
| 10.34 | | 10.34 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated November 16, 2005, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and DDL of Los Angeles LLC (16) |
| 10.35 | | 10.35 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated November 16, 2005, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Bash Entertainment, LLC (16) |
| 10.36 | | 10.1 | | Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2006, between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (17) |
| 10.37 | | 10.1 | | Recission Agreement, dated September 25, 2006, between the Registrant and Richard Goldring (18) |
| 10.38 | | 10.38 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated January 24, 2006, between the Registrant and AYA Entertainment, Inc. (16) |
| 10.39 | | 10.1 | | Amended and Restated Master License Agreement, dated November 13, 2006, between the Registrant and Entertainment Services, Inc. (19) |
| 10.40 | | 10.1 | | Employment Agreement, dated March 1, 2007, with Alex Amoriello (20) |
| 10.41 | | 10.41 | | Lease, dated March 6, 2007, between the Registrant and HQ Global Work Places (16) |
| 10.42 | | 10.42 | | Sublicense Agreement, dated April 2, 2007, between Entertainment Management Services, Inc. and Silver Bourbon, Inc. (16) |
| | SEC Report Reference Number | | |
| 10.43 | | 10.43 | | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 7, 2007, between the Registrant and Alex Amoriello (16) |
| 10.44 | | 10.1 | | Transfer Agreement by and among the Registrant, 333 East 60th Street Inc. (“333”) and Entertainment Management Services, Inc. (“EMS”) dated as of December 9, 2008 |
| 10.45 | | 10.2 | | Cancellation Agreement by and among the Registrant and EMS dated as of January 27, 2009 |
| 10.46 | | 10.3 | | Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and among the Registrant, 333 and EMS dated as of January 27, 2009 |
| 10.47 | | * | | License Agreement, dated January 27, 2009, between the Registrant and I.M. Operating LLC |
| 16 | | 16.1 | | Letter, dated February 28, 2005, from Radin, Glass &Co., LLP (21) |
| 21 | | 21 | | Subsidiaries - As of March 31, 2009, we had one subsidiary: Scores Licensing Corp. |
| 31.1/31.2 | | * | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1/32.2 | | * | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** |
| | | | | |
* filed herewith.
** This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 1998 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 22, 1998, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(2) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2000 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 30, 1999, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(3) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 29, 2001 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2001, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(4) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2002 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 11, 2002, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(5) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2002 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 2002, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(6) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2003 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(7) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2004 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2004, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(8) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 28, 2002 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 2002, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(9) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2002 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(10) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2003 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 25, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(11) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2002 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(12) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 23, 2003 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(13) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2004 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(14) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2004 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2004, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(15) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2005 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(16) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2007 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(17) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on SeptemberFebruary 2, 2008 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference |
(18) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 12, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(19) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2006 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(20) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2006 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(21) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 20072009 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2007,2, 2009, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(22) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2005April 15, 2009 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
| (6) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2010 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2005,August 5, 2010, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(23) | Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 17, 2007 as an exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(24) | Included in Exhibit 31.1. |
(25) | Included in Exhibit 32.1. |
In reviewing the agreements included or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember that they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the
applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the applicable agreement and:
| • | should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; |
should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;
| • | have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; |
have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;
| • | may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and |
may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and
| • | were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments. |
were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: April 15, 2009
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Curtis R. Smith
Acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer| Date: April 12, 2011 | SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. |
| | | |
| By: | /s/Robert M. Gans | |
| | Robert M. Gans | |
| | Chief Executive Officer | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/Howard Rosenbluth | |
| | Howard Rosenbluth | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| SIGNATURE | | TITLE | | DATE |
| | | | | |
/s/ Curtis R. SmithRobert M. Gans | | Acting Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial and Accounting OfficerDirector | | April 15, 200912, 2011 |
Curtis R. SmithRobert M. Gans | | | | |
| | | | | |
| /s/ Howard Rosenbluth | | Director | | April 12, 2011 |
| Howard Rosenbluth | | | | |
| | | | |
| /s/ | | Director | | April 12, 2011 |
| Martin Gans | | | | |
PART IV – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements | Page |
| |
| Firm. | | F-2 |
| | | |
| December 31, 2009 | | F-3 |
| | | |
| 2009 | | F-4 |
| | | |
| 2009 | | F-5 |
| | | |
| 2009 | | F-6 |
| | | |
| | F-7 |
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Scores Holding Company, Inc. and subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Scores Holding Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit,equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007.2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Scores Holding Company, Inc. as of December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 and the results of its operations, stockholders’ deficitequity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Scores Holding Company, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 2, the Company has a working capital deficit as of December 31, 2008.2010. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants
New York, New York
April 9, 200912, 2011
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | |
| Cash | | $ | 173 | | | $ | 173 | |
| Licensee receivable – including affiliates – net | | | 13,845 | | | | 25,217 | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | — | | | | 1,123 | |
| Inventory | | | — | | | | 20,700 | |
| Total Current Assets | | | 14,018 | | | | 47,213 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET | | | 333,332 | | | | 220,950 | |
| | | $ | 347,350 | | | $ | 268,163 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 128,826 | | | $ | 126,965 | |
| Bank overdraft | | | 20,982 | | | | — | |
| Notes payable | | | — | | | | 20,000 | |
| Due to EMS – Related party | | | — | | | | 44,978 | |
| Related party payable | | | 6,000 | | | | 15,800 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | | | 155,808 | | | | 207,743 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
| Common stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 165,186,124 and 165,186,124 issued and outstanding,respectively | | | 165,186 | | | | 165,186 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 5,998,117 | | | | 5,998,117 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (5,971,761 | ) | | | (6,102,883 | ) |
| Total Stockholders’ equity | | | 191,542 | | | | 60,420 | |
| | | $ | 347,350 | | | | 268,163 | |
| | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | |
| Cash | | $ | 23,748 | | | $ | 31,694 | |
| Licensee receivable - including affiliates- net | | | 87,731 | | | | 26,732 | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | 6,342 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Curent Assets | | | 117,821 | | | | 58,426 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| INTANGIBLE ASSETS,NET | | | 88,725 | | | | 205,428 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 206,546 | | | $ | 263,854 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY( DEFICIT) | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | $ | 502,353 | | | $ | 22,091 | |
| Related party payable | | | 304,361 | | | | 208,583 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 18,000 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Current Liabilities | | | 824,714 | | | | 230,674 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- issued and outsatanding | | | - | | | | - | |
| Common stock, $.001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized, 165,186,124 issued and 165,186,124 outstanding, respectively | | | 165,186 | | | | 165,186 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 5,998,117 | | | | 5,998,117 | |
| Accumulated deficit | | | (6,781,471 | ) | | | (6,130,123 | ) |
| Total stockholder's equity (Deficit) | | | (618,168 | ) | | | 33,180 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | $ | 206,546 | | | $ | 263,854 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
| REVENUE | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Royalty | | $ | 186,880 | | | $ | 464,686 | |
| Merchandise | | | 375 | | | | 14,856 | |
| Public relations | | | — | | | | 8,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 187,255 | | | | 487,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| COST OF MERCHANDISE SOLD | | | 21,559 | | | | 54,054 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| GROSS PROFIT | | | 165,696 | | | | 433,488 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | | | 422,873 | | | | 773,025 | |
| LOSS ON IMPAIRMENT OF INTANGIBLE | | | 281,216 | | | | — | |
| BAD DEBT EXPENSE (RECOVERY) | | | (669,515 | ) | | | 16,892 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS | | | 131,122 | | | | (356,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 131,122 | | | | (356,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET INCOME (LOSS) | | $ | 131,122 | | | $ | (356,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE BASIC and DILUTED | | $ | 0.00 | | | $ | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC and DILUTED | | | 165,186,124 | | | | 165,186,124 | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
| REVENUES | | | | | | |
| Royalty Revenue | | $ | 514,155 | | | $ | 387,425 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| EXPENSES | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| General and Administrative Expenses | | | 1,165,503 | | | | 547,223 | |
| Debt Forgiveness ( Related Party ) | | | - | | | | (6,000 | ) |
| Debt Forgiveness ( Unrelated Party ) | | | - | | | | (25,436 | ) |
| Bad Debt Expenses | | | - | | | | 30,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS | | | (651,348 | ) | | | (158,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | (651,348 | ) | | | (158,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) | | $ | (651,348 | ) | | $ | (158,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (LOSS) PER SHARE-Basic and Diluted | | $ | (0.00 | ) | | $ | (0.00 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF COMMOM SHARES OUTSTANDING-Basic and Diluted | | | 165,186,124 | | | | 165,186,124 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 and 2009
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | |
| | | Common Stock | | | | | | Paid in | | | Accumulated | | | Stockholders (Deficit) | |
| | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | Equity | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2008 | | | 165,186,124 | | | $ | 165,186 | | | $ | 5,998,117 | | | $ | (5,971,761 | ) | | $ | 191,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (158,362 | ) | | | (158,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2009 | | | 165,186,124 | | | | 165,186 | | | | 5,998,117 | | | | (6,130,123 | ) | | | 33,180 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (651,348 | ) | | | (651,348 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | | 165,186,124 | | | $ | 165,186 | | | $ | 5,998,117 | | | $ | (6,781,471 | ) | | $ | (618,168 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | Additional | | | | | | Total | |
| | | Common Stock | | | Paid in | | | Accu Accumulated | | | Stockholders | |
| | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Capital | | | Deficit | | | (Deficit) Equity | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2006 | | | 165,186,124 | | | $ | 165,186 | | | $ | 5,998,117 | | | $ | (5,746,455 | ) | | $ | 416,848 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (356,429 | ) | | | (356,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2007 | | | 165,186,124 | | | $ | 165,186 | | | $ | 5,998,117 | | | $ | (6,102,883 | ) | | $ | 60,420 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 131,122 | | | | 131,122 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2008 | | | 165,186,124 | | | $ | 165,186 | | | $ | 5,998,117 | | | $ | (5,971,761 | ) | | $ | 191,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
| Net loss | | $ | (651,348 | ) | | $ | (158,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used) in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization | | | 116,703 | | | | 127,904 | |
| Bad debt expense | | | - | | | | 30,000 | |
| Debt Forgiveness | | | - | | | | (31,436 | ) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
| Licensee receivable | | | (60,999 | ) | | | (42,887 | ) |
| Prepaid expenses | | | (6,342 | ) | | | - | |
| Deferred revenue | | | 18,000 | | | | - | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 480,262 | | | | (51,299 | ) |
| NET CASH (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | (103,724 | ) | | | (126,080 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
| Related party payables | | | 95,778 | | | | 178,583 | |
| Bank overdraft | | | - | | | | (20,982 | ) |
| NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | 95,778 | | | | 157,601 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH | | | (7,946 | ) | | | 31,521 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year | | | 31,694 | | | | 173 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents - end of year | | $ | 23,748 | | | $ | 31,694 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for interest | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | 809 | | | $ | - | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) | | $ | 131,122 | | | $ | (356,429 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used) in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization | | | 59,720 | | | | 59,720 | |
| Loss on impairment of intangible | | | 281,216 | | | | — | |
| Bad debt recovery | | | (453,318 | ) | | | — | |
| Changes in Assets and Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
| Royalty receivable | | | 11,372 | | | | 5,572 | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | 1,123 | | | | 62,504 | |
| Inventory | | | 20,700 | | | | 48,090 | |
| Due to EMS | | | (44,978 | ) | | | 44,978 | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 1,861 | | | | 15,705 | |
| NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED) IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | 8,818 | | | | (119,860 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
| Related party payable | | | (9,800 | ) | | | 6,200 | |
| Repayment of notes payable | | | (20,000 | ) | | | (117,500 | ) |
| Bank overdraft | | | 20,982 | | | | — | |
| NET CASH (USED) IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | (8,818 | ) | | | (111,300 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| NET (DECREASE) IN CASH | | | — | | | | (231,159 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year | | | 173 | | | | 231,332 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year | | $ | 173 | | | $ | 173 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the year for interest | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Cash paid during the year for taxes | | $ | 3,625 | | | $ | 9,354 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082010
Note 1. Organization
Scores Holding Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a Utah corporation, formed in September 1981 and is located in New York, NY. Formerly, Internet Advisory Corporation, the Company is a licensing company that exploits the “Scores” name and trademark for franchising and other licensing options.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Scores Licensing Corp.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
BASIS OF PRESENTATION - Going Concern
Scores HoldingThe Company Inc. and Subsidiaries (“SCRH”) has incurred cumulative losses totaling $(5,971,761) through December 31, 2008 and has$(6,781,471) a working capital deficit of $(141,790)$(618,168) and a net operating loss of ($651,348) at December 31, 2008.2010. Because of these conditions, SCRHthe Company will require additional working capital to develop business operations. SCRHThe Company intends to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of the brand with its current and new operators and to take on operations in larger cities with greater demand for our product through acquisitions. There are no assurances that SCRHthe Company will be able to achieve the level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support SCRHs’the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any future use of licensing, are insufficient, SCHthe Company will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to SCRH.the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, SCRHthe Company may not increase its operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about SCRHs’the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should SCRHs’the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidationconsolidation.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents. There are times wherewhen cash may exceed $250,000, the FDIC insured limit.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Inventory
Inventory consists primarily of finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market on a first-in first-out “FIFO” basis. In performing our cost valuation, we consider the condition and salability of our inventory and may adjust the valuation due to anticipated changes that may materially affect its basis. Management believes that due to the lack of movement in our inventory which has since become obsolete, was written down in the amount of $20,700 and $0 for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively.
Accounting for Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets, certain identifiable assets and any goodwill related to those assets for impairment whenever circumstances and situations change such that there is an indication that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company believes that the carrying amount of the Scores” trademark exceeds its fair or net present value and has recognized anthere is no impairment loss in the amount of $281,216to record for the yearyears ended December 31, 2008. This impairment was based on the various adverse chains2010 and 2009, hence such long-lived assets are fairly stated as of eventsDecember 31, 2010 and circumstances regarding the loss of our Scores East “Marquee” and Scores West clubs.2009.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported inCompany follows the balance sheetprovisions of ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements which defines fair values, establishes a framework for cash,measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company's financial instruments include licensee receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable approximaterelated party payable. The fair value, based on the short-term maturityvalues of these instruments.all financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values.
Royalty and NotesLicensee receivable and reserves
Accounts deemed uncollectible are applied against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance of allowanceAllowance for doubtful accounts had a balance of $2,745,084$14,000 and $3,339,800$14,000 for the December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 periods. In reviewing any delinquent royalty or note receivable, we considerthe Company considers many factors in estimating ourits reserve, including historical data, experience, customer types, credit worthiness, financial distress and economic trends. From time to time, wethe Company may adjust ourits assumptions for anticipated changes in any of theseabove or other factors expected to affect collectibility. Subsequent to year end 2006, we were informed through common ownership, that our former East and Westside affiliates were undergoing financial distress and that the pending matters with the State Liquor License Authority would have a material impact on cash flow and operations. As a result, a collection for royalties and notes receivable amounting to $1,540,870 and $1,867,310 were deemed impaired as of December 31, 2006. Cash collected on these impaired royalties amounted to $35,928 and $73,250 from Scores West and $14,788 and $0 from Scores East for the period ended 2008 and 2007. During the 2008 period the Company purchased the Master License from EMS for $600,000 and issued a credit for $600,000 to Scores East which was applied as a reversal to bad debt expense.collectability.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Advertising Costs
The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. The advertising expenses for the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 are $10,184$31,846 and $16,731$346 respectively.
Stock Based Compensation
We accountThe Company accounts for the grantplans under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation. The standard requires entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for stock options and restricted stock awards in accordance with SFAS 123R, “Share-Based Payment, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize in the statement of operationsbased on the grant-date fair value of stock optionsthe award, and other equity based compensation.to recognize the cost over the period the employee is required to provide services for the award.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
There were no stock options or warrants issued during the year. Weyears ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, hence we have recorded no compensation expense. If the Company were to issue equity rights for compensation, then the Company would recognize compensation expense for stock options granted to employees duringunder Topic 718 over the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.In accordance with SFAS 123, the fair value of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of the grantrequisite service period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:for equity rights granted.
Assumptions utilized computing fair value under the Black Scholes model are as follows:
| | | For the year ended | |
| | | December 31, | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Risk free interest rate | | | .37 | % | | | 3.34 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Expected life | | 4.5 years | | | 5.5 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Dividend rate | | | 0.00 | % | | | 0.00 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Expected volatility | | | .37 | % | | | 17 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Company records revenues from its license agreements on a straight line basis over the term of the license agreements. If a license agreement is terminated then the remaining unearned balance of the deferred revenues are recorded as earned if applicable. Revenue is recognized when earned, as products are completed and delivered or services are provided to customers.
Revenues earned under its royalty agreements are recorded as they are earned.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accountingaccounts for income taxes as set forth in SFAS 109,accordance with ASC 740-10-25, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” UnderTaxes”. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the differencefuture tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement and tax basescarrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effectexpected to apply to taxable income in the years in which thethose temporary differences are expected to reverse. be recovered or settled.
The Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $5,985,000,$6,107,000, which expire in the years 2015 and 2018.2018 through 2030. The related deferred tax asset of approximately $2,650,000$2,910,000 has been offset by a valuation allowance. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards may have been limited, pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382, as to the utilization of such net operating loss carryforwards due to changes in ownership of the Company over the years.
| | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 2,710,000 | | | $ | 2,664,000 | |
| Temporary – legal accrual | | | 200,000 | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Less valuation allowance | | | (2,910,000 | ) | | | (2,664,000 | ) |
| Net deferred tax asset | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | |
| Net operating loss carryforward | | $ | 2,650,000 | | | $ | 1,130,000 | |
| Receivable allowance | | | — | | | | 1,471,000 | |
| Less valuation allowance | | | (2,650,000 | ) | | | (2,601,000 | ) |
| Net deferred tax asset | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate differs from the Federal income tax rate of 34% for the years ended December 31, 20082010 and 2007,2009, as a result of the following:
| | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| Tax (benefit) at statutory rate | | $ | 46,000 | | | $ | (112,000 | ) | | $ | (221,000 | ) | | $ | (54,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| State and local taxes | | | 14,000 | | | | (34,000 | ) | | | (67,000 | ) | | | (16,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Permanent differences | | | (109,000 | ) | | | — | | | | 42,000 | | | | 37,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Change in valuation allowance | | | 49,000 | | | | 146,000 | | | | 246,000 | | | | 33,000 | |
| Tax due | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
Loss Perper Share
The Company has adopted SFAS 128, "Earnings per Share." LossUnder ASC 260-10-45, “Earnings Per Share”, basic loss per common share is computed by dividing income availablethe loss applicable to common shareholdersstockholders by the weighted average number of common shares assumed to be outstanding during the period.period of computation. Diluted earningsloss per common share areis computed using the weighted average number of common shares plusand, if dilutive, potential common share equivalentsshares outstanding during the period usingperiod. There were 85,000 options outstanding or potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the treasury stock method. Commonyears ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Since there was net losses during such years all common stock equivalents (common stock warrants) inhave been excluded as they would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the amountweighted average number of 85,000 options were not included incommon shares outstanding for the computationyears ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, is the same for purposes of losscomputing both basic and diluted net income per share for the periods presented because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.such years.
Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Included in Accrued Liabilities is a $450,000 estimate to settle some pending litigation discussed hereinafter.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company earned royalties and merchandise revenues from fourfive licensees who are unrelated from management of the Company. During the December 31, 20082010 period, end, revenues earned from royalties and merchandise sales from these unrelated licensees amounted to $187,255$358,758 and there is $13,845was $46,836 due and outstanding as of December 31, 2008. Our2010. The Company’s New York affiliate commenced operations in May 2009 and revenue amounted to $155,416 during the 2010 period. The Company’s Baltimore club had revenues increased to 27% from $133,751 in the 2010 period to $105,358 in the 2009 period and Chicago licensees account forrevenues increased to 23% to $106,987 in the majority or our revenues;2010 period from $87,320 in 2008 Baltimore and Chicago accounted for 25% and 33% andthe 2009 period Chicago. In addition, revenues from the Company’s New Orleans nightclub increased 62% to $60,000 in 2007 they accounted for 15% and 18%, respectively. Ourthe 2010 period from $37,000 in the 2009. The Company’s AYA, Scoreslive.com licensee website is still in the development stage since 2007, it has accounted for a minimal amount of our total royalty revenues to date fordate. On September 30, 2010, we entered into a licensing agreement with Tampa Food & Entertainment, Inc. Upon signing the 2008 period.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007,contract, we received a non-refundable fee. For the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141”) and Statement No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“FAS 160”). FAS No. 141 (revised 2007) requiresnext twelve months we will receive a flat fee of per month with an acquirer to measure the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at their fair values on the acquisition date, with goodwill being the excess value over the net identifiable assets acquired. This standard also requires the fair value measurement of certain other assets and liabilities related to the acquisition such as contingencies. FAS 141 (revised 2007) applies prospectively to business combinations and is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
FAS 160 require that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and the non-controlling interest with disclosure of both amounts on the consolidated statement of income. The calculation of earnings per share will continueadvance payment to be based on income amounts attributable tomade at the parent. The presentation provisions of FAS 160 are to be applied retrospectively, and FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2, “Partial Deferralsigning of the Effective Datecontract. After the first twelve months, royalties payable to us under this license will be capped at the greater of Statement 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 delaysa certain dollar amount per month or a percentage of net revenues. During the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of FSP 157-2 on nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, but do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.year ended 2010 $43,000 was recorded as revenue.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082010
In March 2008,
All newly issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements have been deemed to either be irrelevant or immaterial to the FASB issued FAS 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instrumentsoperations and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requirereporting disclosures of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of FAS 161, but do not expect the adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.Company.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” The FSP will require us to allocate the liability and equity components of the convertible debt and reflect our non-convertible debt borrowing rate for the interest component of the convertible debt. The FSP will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. Upon the retrospective implementation of this FSP, we will record an unamortized debt discount of approximately $32.6 million, which will be amortized over a period of six years from the date our convertible debt was issued. This will result in recording additional annual interest expense of approximately $5.3 million pre-tax (or approximately $3.4 million after-tax, which approximates $0.04 per share).
In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-5”). EITF 07-5 provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and the instruments settlement provisions. EITF 07-5 clarifies the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of EITF 07-5 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” This FSP applies to financial assets within the scope of accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements in accordance with SFAS 157. This FSP clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in determining the fair values of assets or liabilities in a market that is not active. This FSP is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Note 3. Related-Party Transactions
a. Transactions with Common ownership affiliates
On January 27, 2009, which became effective on December 9, 2008, the Company and Entertainment Management Services, Inc.entered into a licensing agreement with its affiliate through common ownership I.M. Operating LLC (“EMS”IMO”) completedfor the closing (the “Closing”)use of the transfer from EMSScores brand name “Scores New York”. IMO is also owned by Robert M. Gans who is the Company’s majority shareholder. During the years 2010 and 2009, IMO paid $236,866 and $146,082 respectively in administrative costs related to accounting, business development, insurance and legal services for the Company, which a portion thereof remains a payable to this related party. The Company also leases office space directly from Westside Realty of all licensing and royalty rights granted to EMS byNew York (WSR), the Company under that certain Amended and Restated Master License Agreement by and between EMS and the Company (the “MLA”). Under the MLA, the Company had granted EMS the exclusive worldwide license for twenty years plus six five-year renewals at the option of EMS to sublicense the Company’s trademarks and related properties (the “Licensing Rights”). Additionally, under the MLA, EMS was entitled to receive 50%owner of the licensing fees paid by various non-affiliated nightclubs (the Existing Sublicensees”) to EMS (the “EMS Royalty Rights”).
EMS is owned by 333 East 60West 27th Street Inc. (“333”)Building. The majority owner of WSR is Robert M. Gans. Between January 1, and 333 is owned byMarch 31, 2009, the Share Sellers who are Richard Goldring and Elliot Osher.
Atmonthly rent including overhead was $5,000. Since April 1, 2009, the Closing and pursuantmonthly rent was reduced to the terms of the transfer agreement by and between the Company and EMS dated December 9, 2008, EMS assigned to the Company the Licensing Rights and the EMS Royalty Rights relating to the Existing Sublicensees, free and clear of any charges, liens or other encumbrances. In consideration of these assignments, the Company credited 333 with a $600,000 payment against a $1,220,475 debt owed by 333 to the Company (the “Debt”) and provided 333 with an acknowledgement that the Debt was satisfied to the extent of the $600,000 payment. As of December 31, 2008, the remaining balance was written off. Additionally, at the Closing, EMS and the Company executed a cancellation and mutual release agreement canceling the MLA and terminating all of the rights and obligations of the parties thereunder.
b. Go West Entertainment, Inc.
During 2008 and 2007, the Company had a temporary$2,500 per month to month occupancy with Go West Entertainment, Inc., “Go West”. The former President, Chief Executive Officer Director of the Company is also one of the two shareholders of Go West.
c. "Unwinding" transaction and Master License Agreement
Immediately after the closing of our transfer of Go West in 2002, we entered into a Master License Agreement (the "Master License") with Entertainment Management Services, Inc. ("EMS"). The Master License grants to EMS the exclusive worldwide license to use and to grant sublicenses to use the "SCORES" trademarks in connection with the ownership and operation of upscale, adult-entertainment cabaret night clubs/restaurants and for the sale of merchandise by such establishments. Merchandise must relate to the nightclub that sells it, and may be sold at the nightclub, on an internet site maintained by the nightclub, by mail order and by catalogue. The term of the Master License is twenty years. EMS has the option to renew the Master License for six consecutive five-year terms. We will receive royalties equal to 4.99% of the gross revenues of all sublicensed clubs that are controlled by EMS. We will also receive royalties generated by sublicensing use of the SCORES name to adult entertainment nightclubs that are not controlled by EMS.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
In consideration of all payments made by us on behalf of Go West for the construction of the club, Go West has given to us its Secured Promissory Note in the amount of $1,636,264. The principal of the Note is payable in sixty monthly installments commencing on November 1, 2003 and ending on October 1, 2008. The first twelve monthly installments are $10,000 each. The next forty-eight installments of principal are $31,289 each. Interest at the rate of 7% per annum will accrue on the unpaid balance of principal until maturity. Interest payments are due monthly with each installment of principal commencing November 1, 2003. The Note is secured by Go West's leased interest in its New York nightclub. Interest receivable of $355,188 was due at December 31, 2008. Due to the matter regarding the State liquor Authority and our affiliate Go West as discussed in Note 7 below. Legal Proceedings,including overhead costs. The Company believes that collection of the $1,867,310 which includes accrued interest of $355,189 balances have been impaired and hence, reserved for the full amount outstanding of $1,867,310owed WSR approximately $52,500 in unpaid rents as of December 31, 2008.2010.
The total amounts due to the various related parties as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $304,361 and $208,583, respectively.
Note 4. Intangible Assets
Trademark
In connection with the acquisition of HEIR (also known as, Scores Licensing Company) as discussed above, the Company acquired the trademark to the name "SCORES". This trademark had a gross recorded value at December 31, 2008 of $878,318 which was derived fromhad been increased for the initial purchase from HEIR for $250,000 $175,000 of trademark as a result of the settlement agreement entered into in September 2006 between the Company and affiliated parties and Scores Entertainment Inc. ("SEI") and Irving Bilzinsky ("Bilzinsky") and $453,318 from the result of our purchase of the Royalty Rights and Licensing Rights under the MLA from EMS in December 2008.. This trademark has been registered in the United States, Canada, Japan, Mexico and the European Community. The trademark is being amortized by straight line method over an estimated useful life of ten years. The Company's trademark having an infinite useful life by its definition is being amortized over ten years due to the difficult New York legal environment for which the related showcase adult club is operating. The Company recorded $59,720$91,703 in 20082010 and $59,720$102,904 of amortization expense, in 2007.2009. The Company estimates that amortization expense will be approximately $50,000 per year over$88,000 for the next five years.
The Company believes that the carrying amount of the Scores” trademark exceeds its fair or net present value and has recognized an impairment loss in the amount of $281,216 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This impairment was based on the various adverse chains of events and circumstances regarding the closing of our Scores East “Marquee” and Scores West clubs which management believes may have materially impacted our brand.
before being completely amortized.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082010
The Company believes that the carrying amount of the “Scores” trademark exceeds its fair or net present value as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Note 5. NotesAccounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
As a result of the settlement agreement entered into in September 2006 between the CompanyAccounts Payable and affiliated parties and Scores Entertainment Inc. ("SEI") and Irving Bilzinsky ("Bilzinsky"), the Company is obligated to pay Bilzinsky,accrued expenses as sole shareholder of SEI, $175,000 in 18 monthly installments, which commenced on September 24, 2006, of $9,375 for each of the first 8 months and $10,000 for each of the remaining 10 months. As of December 31, 20082010 is comprised of $450,000 for estimated settlement costs attributed to one of the Company paid the remaining $20,000 due on the settlement.lawsuits discussed hereafter, professional fees $18,000 and miscellaneous accruals and payables of $34,353. Accounts Payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2009 is comprised of miscellaneous accruals and payables of $22,091.
Note 6. Stock Option
Stock-Based Compensation Describe theStock option planIn 2002, two former employeesplan: The below options are unsubscribed and were granted stockto our former President, CEO, Director and Secretary in consideration with their employment with the Company. These options were granted by the Board whichfor the optionee to purchase shares of our common stock. These stock options are not “incentive stock options” under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The granted options fully vested upon issuance on October 22, 2002 and expire on March 31, 2013.
Stock option activity for the two years ended December 31, 20082010 is summarized as follows:
| | | | | | Weighted | | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | Average | | | | | | Average | |
| | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | | | Shares | | | Exercise Price | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2006 | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2008 | | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | | — | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Exercised | | — | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Expired or cancelled | | | — | | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2007 | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2009 | | | | 85,000 | | | | 2.80 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | | — | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Exercised | | — | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Expired or cancelled | | | — | | | | — | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2008 | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at December 31, 2010 | | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options $2.80.
All such options are vested and exercisable
The weighted average remaining contractual life and weighted averagefair value of these options outstanding is $0.037 per option. The intrinsic value of a stock option/SSAR is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of options outstanding at December 31, 2008 for selected exercise price ranges, are follows:
Range of Exercise prices | | | Number of options outstanding | | | Weighted Average remaining contractual life | | | Weighted Average exercise price | | | Options Exercisable | | | Weighted average exercise price of options exercisable | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| $ | 2.80 | | | | 80,000 | | | | 4.75 | | | $ | 2.80 | | | | 80,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | |
| | 2.80 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 4.75 | | | | 2.80 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 2.80 | |
| $ | 2.80 | | | | 85,000 | | | | 4.75 | | | $ | 2.80 | | | | 85,000 | | | $ | 2.80 | |
the options/SSAR. The aggregate intrinsic value of the Company's outstanding and exercisable options atoptions/SSAR as of December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 was $0 and $0 respectively.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082010
Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies
Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 20082010 and 20072009 was $56,000$30,000 and $101,163$32,500 respectively. In June 2007, the Company voluntarily terminated its one year lease agreement with HQ Global services, Inc. to occupy an office in White Plains and a satellite office on Park Ave in New York. Security deposits in the amount of $7,000 were offset by the July and August rents in 2007.
In July 2007, we occupiedThe Company currently leases office space from Go West, on a temporary, month-to-month basis, approximately 700 square feet of office space located at 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY. On July 1, 2008 we cancelled our occupancy with Go West and currently pay $5,000 per month, including overhead costs, for this office space withthe Westside Realty of New York which is owned and operated by Bob Gans.Robert Gans our majority shareholder, for $2,500 a month.
On March 22, 2010, Russell Whelchel, who performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at the Scores West nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street, New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint on July 30, 2010. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal and New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with Scores West between May 2009 and February 13, 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages and injunctive relief. The Company disputes that it was an employer of the plaintiff; contends that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather an independent contractor of Scores West and denies all allegations seeking damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. The Company intends to vigorously defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s complaint. The Company is currently engaged with the plaintiff in the exchange of discovery.
On March 16, 2010, Charles Braden, who claims he performed work as a hair and makeup stylist at the Scores New York nightclub located at 536 West 28th Street, New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the S.D.N.Y. The plaintiff is seeking to recover under federal and New York labor laws minimum wages, unlawful deductions, misappropriated gratuities and other wages for the period of his “employment” with “Scores New York” between approximately January 2005 and September 2010. Additionally, the plaintiff is seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, liquidated damages, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs of the action and other relief as the S.D.N.Y. deems just and reasonable. The Company disputes that it was an employer of the plaintiff, contends that the plaintiff was not an “employee” but rather an independent contractor of Scores West and denies all allegations seeking damages under federal and state wage and hour laws. The Company intends to vigorously defend against all claims in the plaintiff’s complaint.
In mid March 2010, the Company was named by Nichole Hughes in a complaint filed with the SCNY. Ms Hughes is suing the Company for an unspecified amount of damages in connection with an alleged unauthorized use of her image in the Company’s advertising materials. On June 20, 2010, the Company filed a pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint, which was denied on December 17, 2010. The Company then filed an answer and affirmative defenses and a third party complaint against IMO, owner and operator of the club where Ms. Hughes was employed. The case is now in discovery. The Company will vigorously defend itself in this litigation and does not expect that the outcome will be material.
On January 14, 2010, the Company was named in a complaint filed with the SCNY in connection with an alleged assault on the plaintiff by an agent of the Company’s New York affiliated club. The Company filed a motion to dismiss this complaint and, on December 15, 2010, the plaintiff stipulated to discontinue the case against the Company.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
On June 23, 2009, the Company filed a complaint with the SCNY against Silver Bourbon, Inc., its licensee in New Orleans and operator of Scores New Orleans, for breach of contract. At the time of the filing, Silber Bourbon, Inc. owed the Company $70,000 in unpaid royaltiesWe have settled this matter with Silver Bourban, Inc. and the court action has been discontinued..
On September 5, 2008, Ruth Fowler, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West, filed a civil lawsuit against the Company in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”). The plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for alleged illegal deductions take from her salary and monies due her and for sexual harassment under the New York City and New York State Human Rights Laws. On May 7, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the action against it but that motion was denied by the Court with possible leave to renew the motion at a future date after the completion of discovery proceedings. In the meanwhile, counsel for plaintiff filed an amended complaint on February 26, 2010 to add as additional parties to the action Go West and EMS. On March 1, 2010, the Company filed affirmative defenses and an amended response asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS. On September 13, 2010, the SDNY denied plaintiff’s application for further discovery and on October 18, 2010, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which has yet to be decided on. Although the outcome of this action is uncertain, the Company believes that any outcome will not have a material effect on it, since the plaintiff was only employed by Scores West for less than four months.
In early March 2008, wethe Company received notice that DIF&B, owner of the Las Vegas club, would be canceling its sublicense with EMS effective on or before May 6, 2008. We wereThe Company was notified that DIF&B would be making final royalty payments to EMS totaling $60,000 at the rate of $10,000 per week starting the first week of March 2008. The Las Vegas club ceased operating and, as of December 31, 2008, EMS had received only one such $10,000 payment from DIF&B. EMS commenced an action against DIF&B and filed a complaint and affidavit of service with the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (the “SCNY”),SCNY, on July 23, 2008. DIF&B was required to file an answer by August 23, 2008, but did not do so. As a result, EMS filed an application for a default judgment and the SCNY appointed a referee to determine damages. The referee determined that damages in the amount of $216,000, with interest, should be paid to EMS. This amount must be confirmedEMS and a default judgment totaling $230,557 was entered by the SCNY in a final judgment. If such a judgment is rendered byClerk of the SCNY, weSCNY. The Company will attempt to collect on thethis judgment. WeThe Company will be entitled to all monies so collected, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement with EMS and 333.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
On December 11, 2007, Francis Vargas, a former cocktail waitress at Scores West located in New York, NY, filed a civil lawsuit against usthe Company and Go West in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York,SCNY, alleging violations of the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law, New York City Human Rights Law, and the New York City Administrative Code, based upon allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. The lawsuit further alleges that at all material times both wethe Company and Go West were employers of Ms. Vargas, the plaintiff. The law suit seeks unspecified compensatory damages for plaintiff’s alleged loss of past and future earnings and benefits, emotional distress, humiliation and loss of reputation. We disputeThe Company disputes that we wereit was an employer of the plaintiff and categorically denydenies all allegations of sexual discrimination and sexual harassment. WeThe Company filed ourits verified answer in the Supreme Court of the State of New York on February 12, 2008 to contest and defend against these accusations and we areit is currently engaged in discovery. On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy and the case was stayed. On July 23, 2009, the bankruptcy petition was dismissed and, as a result, the automatic stay was lifted. The Company subsequently filed an amended response asserting cross-claims for judgment against both Go West and EMS and a motion to compel discovery, which was approved. The Company is currently stayed.preparing for the plaintiff’s deposition and a compliance conference which are scheduled for the end of April.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
On October 9, 2007, former Go West bartender Siri Diaz filed a purported class action and collective action on behalf of all tipped employees against usthe Company and other defendants alleging violations of federal and state wage/hour laws (Siri Diaz et al. v. Scores Holding Company, Inc.; Go West Entertainment, Inc. a/k/a Scores West Side; and Scores Entertainment, Inc., a/k/a Scores East Side, Case No. 07 Civ. 8718 (Southern District of New York (the “Court”), Judge Richard M. Berman)). On November 6, 2007, plaintiffs served an amended purported class action and collective action complaint, naming dancers and servers as additional plaintiffs and alleging the same violations of federal and state wage/hour laws. On or about February 21, 2008, plaintiffs served a second amended complaint adding two additional party defendants, but limiting the action to persons employed in the New York Scores’ clubs. The amended complaint allegesalleged that wethe Company and the other defendants arewere “an integrated enterprise” and that wethe Company jointly employemployed the plaintiffs, subjecting all of the defendants to liability for the alleged wage/hour violations. We dispute that we violated the federal and state labor laws, and further dispute that the dancers are “employees” subject to the federal and state wage and hour laws. We intend to vigorously contest the claimed liability as well as the violations alleged.
On April 18, 2008, co-defendant Go West filed for bankruptcy.
On behalf of ourselvesthe Company and the other defendants wethe Company filed a motion to dismiss that portion of the Complaint that asserted State law class action allegations; wethe Company also moved to dismiss the claims of two of the named plaintiffs for failure to appear for depositions. At the same time plaintiffs moved for conditional certification under the federal law for a class of the servers, bartenders and dancers; wethe Company opposed that motion. On May 9, 2008, the Court issued its decision, denying the motion to dismiss and granting conditional certification for a class of servers, cocktail waitresses, bartenders and dancers who have worked at Scores East since October 2004. The case is stayed as against Go West pursuant to the bankruptcy law. The Court directed that notice be sent to all potential class members. On May 29, 2008, wethe Company filed an answer to plaintiffs’plaintiff's’ second amended complaint. Discovery into bothOn or about September 5, 2009, plaintiffs served their third amended complaint adding in two individual defendants who are alleged to be employers under the proceduralstate and substantive issues is ongoing, as are settlement negotiations.
In February 2007, the City of New York (the “City”) sought to close Scores West claimingfederal wage claims. The Company disputes that it presentedis a public nuisance. The City allegedproper defendant in this action and it disputes that this nightclub was used for purposes of prostitution;it violated the case was dismissed byfederal and state labor laws, and further disputes that the City of New York and no charges were sought against Scores West or us. In February, 2007, the New York State Liquor Authority (the “NYSLA”) began a review of the license held by Scores West and issued an Emergency Summary Order of Suspension of the Scores West liquor license on February 21, 2007. Go West, the owner of Scores West, filed a pleading with the NYSLA on behalf of Scores West. After a temporary adjournment and a series of hearings in front of an administrative law judge, on February 4, 2008, this judge sustained all charges against Scores West. A NYSLA hearing was held on March 6, 2008 and the NYSLA revoked the Scores West Liquor license. On March 18, 2008, the New York State Appellate Division, First Department (the “Appellate Court”) granted an interim stay of the liquor license revocation pending a review by the full bench of the Appellate Court. On April 15, 2008 the Appellate Court decided to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. Go West filed with the Appellate Court for a reconsideration of its decision, which was denied. As a result of this outcome, Scores West has closed. The Appellate Court decided to hear this case on the merits and, on October 3, 2008, found in favor of the NYSLA, upholding the NYSLA’s revocation of the Scores West Liquor License. Go West subsequently filed a motion for re-argument before the Appellate Court and/or leave to appealdancers are “employees” subject to the New York Court of Appeals. This further motion was withdrawn by Go West.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC.federal and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
On April 18, 2008, Go West filedstate wage and hour laws. The Company has recorded a voluntary petition for bankruptcy with$450,000 estimate to settle this lawsuit, as the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), under Chapter 11 oflegal fees defending the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This filing followedCompany’s position during the April 15, 2008 Appellate Court decision to deny a further stay of the March 2008 revocation by the NYSLA of the Scores West liquor license. [As of the date hereof, an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditorsyear has not been formed nor has a Trustee or Examiner been appointed in this case. Go West’s bankruptcy case is pending in the Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 08-11420. The United States Trustee in this case filed a motion seeking the dismissal or conversion of Go West’s Chapter 11 case as Go West is no longer operating. That motion was granted by the Bankruptcy Court and an order will be entered once Go West completes its stipulations with the Internal Revenue Service (regarding the payment of unpaid federal taxes) and the New York State Department of Taxation (regarding a payment plan for state taxes due).
Scores West has permanently lost its liquor license and has closed its business. As a result, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Go West, owner of that club. In 2006, royalty revenues from Scores West amounted to 31% of our royalties. We did not receive any revenue from Scores West in 2008 or in 2007. Because Scores West has closed, the ability of Go West to make payments under the Note (defined below) has been severely impaired. The Note is currently in default.
On May 2, 2008, the NYSLA gave notice of its pleading to 333, the owner of Scores East, in connection with its proceeding to cancel or revoke the liquor license of Scores East, based on its revocation of the Scores West liquor license. (Scores West and Scores East were related by common ownership.) On July 2, 2008, the NYSLA gave 333 a notice of hearing set for August 19, 2008. Based on the filing with the NYSLA of a conditional no-contest plea, this hearing was adjourned. 333 has since surrendered its liquor license for Scores East and that club has permanently closed. Because of these developments, we are no longer able to receive royalty revenues from Scores East, which in 2006, amounted to 28% of our royalties. We did not receive any revenue from Scores East in 2008 or in 2007.approximately $80,000.
On March 30, 2007, we,the Company, along with several of ourits affiliates, were named in a suit in connection with an alleged assault by an employee of an affiliate and one of ourthe Company’s stockholders and former officer and director. We have recentlyThe Company has answered a third amended complaint and participated incompleted discovery. The Company has filed a Preliminary Conference to establishnote of issue with the discovery schedule. Examinations beforecourt and is waiting for a court date on which the trial of the parties have been completed and non-party depositions are now being taken.will begin. The plaintiff has not yet undergone the required physical examination. WeCompany will vigorously defend ourselvesitself in this litigation and dodoes not expect that the outcome will be material.
On December 11, 2006, SMG, our former affiliate and owner of the club in North Miami, Florida, filed for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. In connection therewith, it terminated its license agreement with EMS whereby it was authorized to use our intellectual property. At the time of its filing, SMG owed us $16,661 for unpaid merchandise, which we subsequently reserved as bad debt. SMG emerged from bankruptcy in September 2008 under a plan or reorganization pursuant to which all general, unsecured debt was discharged, including the $16,661 owed to us.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20082010
On March 31, 2006, Richard K. Goldring, our former president, chief executive officer and principal shareholder pled guilty to one count of offering a False Instrument for Filing in the First Degree pursuant to a plea agreement with the District Attorney of the County of New York (the "DA"). In the event that within one year of the date of the entry of the guilty plea, Mr. Goldring resigns from all "control management positions" that he holds in publicly traded companies, including ours, and divests himself of all "control ownership positions" in publicly traded companies, including ours, and satisfies certain other conditions, the DA will recommend a sentence of probation. In this context, a “control management position” is a role, official or unofficial, by which he substantially directs the decisions of a company, and a “control ownership position” is a position in which he controls, directly or indirectly more than 9% of the voting stock or other securities of a company, or stock or securities that have the capability of being converted into voting stock or other securities of a company. The plea agreement resolved the DA's investigation against Mr. Goldring and us. No charges were brought against us.
To comply with the plea agreement between Richard Goldring and the District Attorney of the County of New York, on September 4, 2008, Mr. Goldring transferred his 76,080,958 shares of our common stock (the “Goldring Shares”) to Ira Altchek as trustee (the “Trustee”). According to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement by and between Mr. Goldring and the Trustee dated September 4, 2008, the Trustee had the right to exercise all rights and powers of a shareholder of the Company with respect to the Goldring Shares, including, without limitation, the sole and exclusive right to vote the Goldring Shares, while Mr. Goldring maintained the right to sell the Goldring Shares at any time. The Goldring Shares represented approximately forty six percent (46%) of the outstanding capital stock of the Company as of the December 31, 2008. On January 27, 2009, Mr. Goldring sold all of the Goldring Shares in a private transaction with Buyer, as further discussed above.
In June 2005, we, together with several of our affiliates, commenced litigation regarding title to certain of our intellectual property. In February 2006, counterclaims were asserted and other persons brought third party complaints. In September 2006, we and our affiliates reached a settlement resolving all claims against us for a payment of $175,000 made in monthly installments. In return, the other parties in the litigation disclaimed any right to our intellectual property.
There are no other material legal proceedings pending to which wethe Company or any of ourits property areis subject, nor to our knowledge are any such proceedings threatened.
SCORES HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
Note 8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2009, Mitchell’s East LLC (“Buyer”), a New York limited liability company wholly owned by Robert M. Gans, purchased an aggregate of 88,900,230 shares (the “Owned Shares”) of common stock of Scores Holding Company, Inc. (the “Company”) beneficially owned by Richard Goldring1 and Elliot Osher (collectively the “Share Sellers”), as well as any rights Harvey Osher (the Share Sellers and Harvey Osher, together, the “Sellers”) mayWe have in 13,886,059 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Decedent Owned Shares”) currently held of record by William Osher, deceased, and any rights the Sellers may have in an additional 2,400,001 shares of the common stock of the Company (the “Expectancy Shares”). Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, Harvey Osher is to deliver to the Buyer the Decedent Owned Shares that he may receive and the Sellers are to deliver to the Buyer any shares of the Company underlying the Expectancy Shares that any such Seller may receive. Additionally, pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, each of the Sellers granted to Buyer an irrevocable proxy enabling Buyer to act as his proxy with respect to any shares underlying the Decedent Owned Shares and the Expectancy Shares, as applicable.evaluated for disclosure purposes, subsequent events.
The aggregate purchase price for all such shares and interests in the Company was $400,000. The source of funds for such acquisition was working capital of Mitchell’s East LLC.
The Owned Shares represent approximately fifty four percent (54%) of the outstanding capital stock of the Company and the Owned Shares together with the Decedent Owned Shares represent approximately sixty two percent (62%) of the outstanding capital stock of the Company,
On January 27, 2009, we entered into a licensing agreement with I.M. Operating LLC (“IMO”)for the use of the Scores brand name with I.M. Operating LLC (“IMO”) The address for IMOs’ operations will be at the location of the former Scores West nightclub, 533-535 West 27th Street, New York, NY (the “West 27th Street Building”)., which is also owned by Robert M. Gans. . Royalties payable to us under this license have been set at 3% of gross revenues. The West 27th Street Building is owned by Westside Realty of New York, of which the majority owner is Robert M. Gans. IMO has applied for and received a liquor license and is currently renovating the club. We believe the club will commence operations in April 2009.
On April 14th 2008, Elda Auerbach resigned from our Board of Directors. Ms. Auerbach’s esignation did not result from any disagreement between her and the Company.