UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


(Mark one)


xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011


2013

¨TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from ________ to ____________


Commission File Number: 001-33937


LiveDeal, Inc.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Nevada 85-0206668

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or

Organization)

 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
   
2490 East Sunset Road,6240 McLeod Drive, Suite 100
120, Las Vegas, Nevada
89120
 89120
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:(702) 939-0230


939-0231

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None


Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:


Common Stock, $.001 Par Value

(Title of Class)


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o   No x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x   No o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x   No ¨


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-Ko


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “ accelerated“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
  
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes oNo  x


The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates computed based on the closing sales price of such stock on March 31, 20112013 was $2,378,488.


$6,124,445.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of December 16, 2011,January 6, 2014, was 2,338,3773,787,269 shares.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the Proxy Statement relating to the Registrant’s 2012registrant’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

 



LIVEDEAL, INC.


FORM 10-K

For the year ended September 30, 2011


2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS


  Page
Part I   
    
Item 1.Business 3
Item 1A.Risk Factors 810
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments 1822
Item 2.Properties 
18
23
Item 3.Legal Proceedings 
18
23
Item 4.(Removed and Reserved)Mine Safety Disclosures 
18
23
    
Part II   
    
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 
19
24
Item 6.Selected Financial Data 
19
25
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 
19
25
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 
28
32
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
28
33
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
29
34
 Consolidated Financial Statements:  
 Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 
30
35
 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 
31
36
 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 
32
37
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 
33
38
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 
34
39
Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 
52
59
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures 
52
59
Item 9B.Other Information 59
    
Part III   
    
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 
54
62
Item 11.Executive Compensation 
54
62
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 
54
62
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 
54
62
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services 
54
62
    
Part IV   
    
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 
54
63
    
Signatures 67

58
2

2


PART I

Forward-Looking Statements


Part I of this

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includesmay include certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.”in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission , (“the SEC”), in materials delivered to our stockholders, in press releases, or in oral or written statements made by our representatives. These forward-looking statements, which are often characterized by the terms “may,” “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” “plans”, or “anticipates,” and do not reflect historical facts.facts but instead are based on our current assumptions and predictions regarding future events, such as business and financial performance. Specific forward-looking statements contained in Part I of this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, our (i) belief that local exchange carrier, or LEC, billing will continue to be a significant billing channel in the future;continued growth of internet usage, particularly via mobile devices, and demand for web-based marketing; (ii) expectation of increasing revenues through our national accounts programs, fulfillment contracts, web hosting and other arrangements; (iii) belief in the continued growth of Internet usage andin the demand for online marketing;  (iv) belief in the growth of the local search and information, market;(iii) belief that small and medium businesses will continue to outsource their online marketing efforts to third parties; (iv) belief that we can cost-effectively expand into other cities due to the scalability of the LiveDeal.com platform; (v) belief that existingthe cash on hand and additional cash generated from operations together with additionalpotential sources of cash obtained from other sourcesthrough issuance of debt or equity will provide usthe company with sufficient liquidity to meet our needs for the next 12 months, such other sources of cash possibly including stock issuancesmonths; and loans; (vi) belief that we would be able to obtain advances from our existing LEC clearing houses through their current advance programs; (vii) belief that we could obtain other formsthe outcome of financing secured bypending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on business, financial position and results of operations, cash flow or leveraged off our accounts receivable based on existing programs in place that are being offered to companies similar to ours; and (viii) belief that existing facilities are adequate for our current and anticipated future needs and that our facilities and their contents are adequately covered by insurance and (ix) belief that our gross profit margin and selling, general and administrative costs will support the company’s business plans and opportunities.


liquidity.

Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. FactorsSome factors and risks that could so affect our results and achievements andinclude the risk factors set forth below under the heading Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Readers should carefully review such risk factors as they identify certain important factors that could cause themactual results to differ materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identifiedand from historical trends. Those risk factors are not exclusive and are in Item 1A. Risk Factors, as well asaddition to other factors and risks (i) that are discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, in our filings with the SEC, and in materials incorporated therein by reference, (ii) that apply to companies generally, or (iii) that we are currently unable to identify or quantify but may exist in the future.


or that we currently deem immaterial. In addition, the foregoing factors and risks may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Any information contained on our website www.livedeal.com(www.livedeal.com) or any other websites referenced in this Annual Report are not a part of this Annual Report.


PART I

ITEM 1. Business


Our Company


LiveDeal, Inc., a Nevada corporation (thewhich, together with its subsidiaries, we refer to as the “Company”, “LiveDeal”, “we”, “us” or “our”) ,providesspecialized online marketing internet directory servicessolutions to small-to-medium sized local businesses, or SMBs, that boost customer awareness and merchant visibility. We offer affordable tools for small businesses. LiveDeal, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc., offers an affordable way for businessesSMBs to extend their marketing reach to local, relevant prospective customers via the internet. We also provide SMBs promotional marketing with the ability to offer special deals and manage theiractivities through LiveDeal.com and our online presence.


publishing partners.

Our principal offices are located at 6240 McLeod Drive, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120, our telephone number is (702) 939-0231, and our corporate website (which does not form part of this report) is located at www.livedeal.com. Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “LIVE”.

Summary Business Description


LiveDeal first started in the

We provide specialized online marketing industrysolutions that boost customer awareness and merchant visibility on the internet. In September 2013, we launched LiveDeal.com, which redefinedthe Company’s strategy and direction, centering its focus on the new LiveDeal.com platform and growing the base of restaurants utilizing the LiveDeal platform to attract new customers.LiveDeal.com is a unique, real-time “deal engine” connecting merchants with consumers. The Company believes that it has developed the first-of-its-kind web/mobile platform providing restaurants with full control and flexibility to instantly publish customized offers whenever they wish to attract customers.

We also recently launched two new business lines under new management after a period of re-evaluating our sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs. In August 2012, we commenced sourcing local deal and activities to strategic publishing partners under our LiveDeal®brand, which we refer to as YP.com. Atpromotional marketing. In November 2012, we commenced the time, YP.com was the first company to bring the print yellow pages to the Internet in 1994. From there we moved into the online classifieds business when we merged with LiveDeal in 2007.  Subsequently the company sold YP.com in March 2009 and discontinued the classifieds business in June 2009.


LiveDeal develops and marketssale of marketing tools that help local businesses manage their online presence.  These tools includepresence under our Velocity Localbrand, which we refer to as online presence marketing.

3

We continue to actively develop, revise and evaluate these products and services and our marketing strategies and procedures. We continue to generate a varietysignificant portion of cloud-based solutionsour revenue from servicing our existing customers under our legacy product offerings, primarily our InstantProfile® line of products and services. Because of the change in our business strategy and product lines, we no longer accept new customers under our legacy product offerings.

Products and Services

LiveDeal.com.

LiveDeal.com is a unique, real-time “deal engine” connecting merchants with consumers. We believe that help businesses extendthe Company has developed the first-of-its-kind web/mobile platform providing restaurants with full control and flexibility to instantly publish customized offers whenever they wish to attract customers. Highlights of the new LiveDeal.com include:

a user-friendly interface enabling restaurants to create limited-time offers and publish them immediately, or on a preset schedule that is fully customizable;
state-of-the-art scheduling technology giving restaurants the freedom to choose the days, times and duration of the offers, enabling them to create offers that entice consumers to visit their establishment during their slower periods;
advanced publishing options allowing restaurants to manage traffic by limiting the number of available vouchers to consumers;
superior geo-location technology allowing multi-location restaurants to segment offers by location, attracting customers to slower locations while eliminating potential over-crowding at busier sites; and
a user-friendly mobile and desktop web interface allowing consumers to easily browse, download, and instantly redeem “live” offers found on LiveDeal.com based on their location.

Restaurants can sign up to use the LiveDeal platform at our website (www.livedeal.com).

We believe one of the primary challenges facing the dining industry is the inefficient and limited number of ways restaurants are able to market offers and promotions to their marketing reachpotential customers. Daily deal companies typically dictate offer terms, such as the discount amount and redemption details. This not only erodes potential profits for restaurant owners but could also drive traffic during already-busy periods for the restaurants. LiveDeal’s model benefits both the restaurant and the consumer because it provides the restaurant the opportunity to local,create any offer they choose, limit the number of potential claimants of their promotion, publish the offer on days and at times of their choosing, and provides customers with relevant customersoffers they can easily and manage their online presence.


Originally founded as YP.comquickly redeem while creating a cost-effective model for LiveDeal to grow and easily scale its operations. We expect to initially derive revenues through premium placement on the site, and we are also exploring various options for monetizing the website.

The Company, best known for migrating print yellow pages to the Internet in 1994, LiveDealbegan to develop the model for LiveDeal.com after having worked closely with well-known publishers in the daily deal market. In mid-2013, we tested the beta platform in a number of cities, and the model has traditionally provided affordable, entry level, online productsbeen well received by restaurants, consumers, and various restaurant associations. We launched LiveDeal.com in the San Diego and Los Angeles, California markets in September 2013 and December 2013, respectively. The Company believes it can cost-effectively expand into other cities due to local businesses.  Today, we have adapted and adjustedthe scalability of the LiveDeal.com platform, as restaurants can curate deals through our company goals to reflect the latest online trends in internet marketingaccount managers or create specials on their own. In addition, individual customers transact directly with the aim of reachingrestaurant, eliminating the need for the Company to act as many smallan intermediary in the sale.

Velocity Local Online Presence Marketing.

We are continually developing and medium-sized businesses as possible.  In March 2010, we adopted the strategy of developing successor products to our directory business and rebuilding our customer base through mass market sales using LEC billing channels and moving away from the higher-end direct sales products offered through Local Marketing Experts, Inc. (which focused on search engine marketing and website creation services together with additional add-on advertising products.)  Since July 2010, the line of business historically known as our yellow page directory service was rebranded and upgraded to the InstantProfile ® product and marketed under our subsidiary Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc.  This new product, which is part of the InstantAgencya suite of products providesand services designed to meet the online subscription toolsmarketing needs of SMBs at affordable prices. Our target customers for our Velocity Localand our LiveDeal®brands are SMB owners who work long hours to deliver real value to their customers in their own communities that do not have the time or expertise to develop the powerful, multi-faceted, online marketing and advertising programs necessary for successful online marketing. Our offerings draw on a decade of experience servicing SMBs in the internet technology environment.

We offer our SMB customers packages of services to create and maintain an online presence. Products and services we offer include template and custom website design, either optimized for desktop or mobile devices, social media marketing, or SMM, and content marketing, or CM. In combination, these products offer a comprehensive online marketing strategy for SMBs at affordable rates. We believe that our online presence marketing products are useful to a large share of SMBs because they enable potential customers to gain awareness of and locate an SMB and to learn about and purchase its products and services.

Mobile Web Apps. We believe that SMBs which take advantage of emerging mobile internet capabilities, will have greater success in acquiring customers, and that SMB owners are recognizing that mastering marketing to mobile internet users is essential for success in today’s technological environment. Accordingly we offer our customers websites targeted to work with the most popular mobile devices, such as iPhones and Android-powered smartphones, that take on the look and feel of a mobile app, without the inconvenience and delay associated with finding, downloading and installing a mobile app.

4

We can base these “mobile web apps” on our proprietary templates at affordable prices, or design customized mobile web apps for customers with larger budgets. Our website design professionals can incorporate text and graphics they create to our customer’s specifications, or utilize text and graphics provided by our customer (such as from its traditional website or its other marketing materials). We endeavor to make these mobile web apps clean, trendy and easily usable on the smaller display area available on smart phones. Our mobile web apps can integrate key features such as click-to-call, Google Maps (providing directions and street view), service or product offerings (such as menus), and live Twitter feeds. We continue to develop and refine our templates to add common options, to serve the special needs of specific industries, and to respond to customer demand and market changes.

Traditional Website Design. We also offer custom website design services for websites targeted at traditional desktop and laptop internet users. Our website design team is composed of experienced web design and creation professionals and graphic designers who create customized websites tailored to the needs and goals of our customers. Our design team can assist with layout as well as content creation (text and images).
Content Marketing (CM). Simply having a website, even one optimized for viewing on mobile devices, does not mean potential customers will actually know about or visit the website. We provide content marketing services, including blog postings (relevant to our customer specifically or to its industry generally) and commenting, updating our client’s websites, blog commenting, social bookmarking, social media directory listing, and profile submission to the major search engines.
Social Media Marketing (SMM). We enable our customers to create an online presence which builds their customer base and enables them to keep in touch with their customers, supporters, and other businesses using popular social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and Google+. We employ dedicated research groups to find relevant information about our clients and writes posts, tweets, and comments which can be posted on relevant social networks to increase visibility to and interaction with their followers and potential customers. These activities can also serve to improve our customer’s search engine rankings.

Promotional Marketing

We also source local special deals and activities for SMBs. With the growth of special deal promotions, many SMBs are experimenting with special offers to drive new customers to their locations. We offer our clients a solution that utilizes our business channels to market our clients’ products and services to broadcast information aboutpotential customers. To use this service, an SMB will generally offer a discount for select products or services, or create a specially priced bundle. Our salespeople assist and guide the SMBs to create enticing and marketable deals. We then find an appropriate channel to publish the deal to relevant potential customers.

Potential customers can gain awareness of our clients’ businesses through these deal publications, and transact business with our SMB clients by purchasing a deal. Our SMB clients benefit from their increased visibility, additional business and the opportunity to gain loyal customers.

Prior to our launch of LiveDeal.com, our business strategy includes partnering established strategic publishing partners to publish and sell our client’s deals in exchange for a share of the top (based on popularity) Internet directories, search engines results, social media networks,revenue. We have entered into sourcing agreements with several reputable publishers who have large user bases, including Travelzoo, Google Local, and Points-of-Interest (POI) databases embeddedAmazon, and act as an intermediary to connect SMBs to our publishing partners. Our business thus relies in part on the leading navigational devices. This ensuresability of our partners to display our clients’ deals to a large, relevant audience and to sell the offers. With the launch of LiveDeal.com, we intend to focus our promotional marketing efforts and offer a substantial portion of those products and services through our own proprietary platform.

InstantProfile® (Legacy)

In addition to our current product offerings, we continue to service customers acquired under our legacy product offerings, primarily our InstantProfile® line of products and services. These services primarily consist of directory listing services. Although we currently generate a significant amount of revenue from these legacy product offerings, we are no longer acquiring customers for them.

Marketing

General. We rely on telemarketing and online lead generation to drive customer acquisition. We have created our own telemarketing sales team which works with highly automated technology and specializes in creating, deploying and managing telemarketing campaigns quickly and efficiently. We believe that our customers are distributedtelemarketing structure enables us to sites such as Google, Yahoo, Bing, Facebook, Twitterbuild and others throughscale sales programs quickly.

We have long-standing relationships with data and lead providers, which enable us to source high quality leads and to focus our distribution network. Additionally, customers receive a communication suite that allows both conference call hostingtelemarketing efforts toward the demographics we believe most likely to result in long-term customers. We primarily market our products and electronic fax services.  We are focusing our efforts on increasing our sales under Velocityservices to SMBs in lists we acquire from third party data companies.

5

Online Presence Marketing Concepts, Inc. and expanding the range of products offered to the market through this sales outlet by selling the Instant Profile and Instant Award products.  This strategy has culminated in the cessation of all new sales under the Local Marketing Experts, Inc. subsidiary (Direct Sales) on December 1, 2010.  In May 2011, the Company assigned its remaining Direct Sales customers to ReachLocal.  Also Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc. sales were paused on July 15, 2011 while the Company evaluates its sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs.


3


. Our current strategy is to market our online presence marketing services to small office/office, home office businesses as well asand local businesses across the country. Our products are affordable and useful to a large portion of the small business market.  Ourtarget customers include retail businessesSMBs, such as restaurants, home repair and services companies, as well as professional firms providing legal, accounting and medical services.  Allservices, which share the common challenges of managing and optimizing their online presence to acquire and acquiring customers online.

We rely on telemarketing and online lead generation to drive customer acquisition.  We partner with companies that are highly automated and specialize in creating, deploying and managing telemarketing campaigns quickly and efficiently.  retain customers.

Our partners have a strong ability to quickly build and scale programs tailored for small businesses.


In recent months, LiveDeal has reworked its product offerings and company structure around this mass-market business model.   In the past fiscal year, we have greatly reduced expenses and streamlined the company.  LiveDeal managed the expense of acquiring a new customer base while reducing operating losses to their lowest levels in several years.  Presently our focus is acquiring additional investment and working capital that will allow us to continue to grow our revenues.  The company stopped new sales under Velocity Marketing Concepts July 15, 2011 to improve the current Instant Profile Products and develop new products as we look for additional investments.

Industry Overview

According to BIA/Kelsey, U.S. Local online/digital advertising revenues will rise to $23.3 billion in 2011. “Local search,” that is, searches for products, services and businesses within a geographic region is an increasingly significant segment of the online advertising industry. Local search allows consumers to search for local businesses’ products or services by including geographic area, zip code, city and other geographically targeted search parameters in their search requests. According to a May 2011 study The Kelsey Group estimates that the local search marketMarket

More than 27 million SMBs operate in the United States will grow from $5.1 billion in 2010today. While a majority of SMBs have a website, most of them are not optimized for mobile devices and therefore do not effectively generate business for the SMB. SMB owners frequently lack the time, expertise or resources necessary to $8.2 billion in 2015. Consumers who conductmake their website a relevant, effective part of their marketing efforts, or to exploit the additional internet marketing channels needed for successful online marketing. Our target customers are SMBs which normally do not market their products and services nationally, but wish to utilize local searches on the Internet (“local searchers”) tend to convert into buying customers at a higher rate than other types of Internet user. As a result, advertisers often pay a significant premium to place their ads in front of local searchers on websites like Local.com or our Network partner websites. Additionally, local small and medium-sized businesses that would not normally compete at the national level for advertising opportunities are increasingly engaging in and competing for local advertisingmarketing opportunities, including local search, to promote their products and services.

Local search is still relatively new, and as a result it is difficult to determine our current market share or predict our future market share. However, we have a number of competitors that have announced an intention to increase their focus on local search with regard to U.S.

Effective online advertising, including some ofmarketing requires the leading online advertising companies in the world,  Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft, among many others with greater experience and resources than we have.


We believe that small businesses that can take advantage of emerging Internet capabilities will be able to acquire customers with greater efficiency than before and those that cannot will suffer in comparison. It is becoming widely recognized among small business owners that mastering the Internet arts is essential.

These new Internet services are inherently technological. They require a deep dedication of time, the marshaling of resources, and the development of technological, skills, language, and presentation expertise and other masteriesskills and expertise that few small business operatorsSMB owners have, or have the intention of acquiring.or realistic ability to acquire. We recognize that, to succeed, a small business person needs tomany SMB owners must remain intensely focused on the fundamentals of his/hertheir business. Small businesses therefore need a partner with

At the necessary expertise and understanding to manage emerging Internet audience acquisition services on their behalf. They need this partner to operate quickly, proactively and at the lowest possible cost.


To that end, we have strategically created and delivered a suite of products and services designed to deliver agency quality products at an affordable cost. This new suite of products delivers high end agency products and services without the costs typically associated with a high end, online, agency firm. The suite of services has a variety of online products and various price points. These products allow LiveDeal to become the small business audience acquisition partner.
LiveDeal customers are small business owners who work long hours to deliver real value to their customers in their own communities with littlesame time, left over to develop and master the powerful, multi-faceted, online marketing and advertising programs that today’s world demands. LiveDeal has stepped up to this challenge, drawing from a decade of experience as a directory provider. 
Products and Services

InstantProfile. As described above, our Internet Advertising Product (“IAP”) package was discontinued in 2010 with the launch of the InstantProfile and InstantProfile premium products. All IAP customers were moved to InstantProfile to take advantage of the new product and features.  Under this package, the advertiser pays for exposure utilizing our InstantProfile product. The advertiser enjoys the benefit of having its business distributed to top Internet destinations (based on popularity), including search engines, top directories, and social media networks. This gives the advertiser the ability to manage its business information in one location and maximize its reach to many locations, as a consumer may search broadly for local business services. InstantProfile customers also enjoy additional benefits with tools to communicate directly with their customers and employees. The InstantProfile platform includes:

4


Instant Profile Basic Package

Instant Profile gives customers the benefit of having its business distributed to top Internet destinations (based on popularity), as well as online tools allowing companies to communicate directly with their customers, employees and partners.

·
Business profile syndication – InstantProfile broadcasts information about a business to top Internet directories, search engines, and Points-of-Interest (POI) databases embedded on the leading navigational devices.  This ensures that our customers are distributed to sites such as Google, Yahoo, Bing, and others through our distribution network. Customers benefit from the ability to manage business information in one location and maximize its reach to many locations, as a consumer may search broadly for local business services.
·
Social Media Broadcast - Allows customers to use one location to broadcast their messages across their entire social media network. By leveraging this automation the advertiser eliminates the need to manage multiple logins for individual websites and duplicate submissions and decreases the time required to broadcast their messages from hours to one click of a button.
·
Electronic fax – Customers can send and receive unlimited faxes through the InstantProfile product dashboard.
·
Conference call services – Customers can host conference calls with up to 10 participants.

InstantProfile Pricing. We generally price our InstantProfile product between $27.50 and $39.95 per month, which includes all of the service benefits previously described. We believe that these prices are comparable to the prices of our competitors, and we believe that our product provides superior value to our customers when considering the many benefitsSMB owners realize that they receive,an effective internet presence – including the ease of use, broad internet distribution and communication tools.

Instant Profile Premium Pricing.  The Instant Profile Premium product is sold for $49.95 per month and includes the features mentioned above.

Instant Profile Premium - The Instant Profile premium product includes all InstantProfile Standard functionality with two additional features:

·
Virtual PBX voice messaging - Provides a professional phone tree for callers that presents any business in a professional light. Voicemails left through this service are conveniently delivered as audio files to the company email; meaning messages are never lost and remain archived as long as needed.
·
Online Data Storage – Customers can store up to 10 gigabytes of data on our cloud server and retrieve it from any computer or device with an Internet connection

Product Solutions

Small businesses that take advantage of emerging Internet capabilities will be better equipped to acquire customers and operate with greater efficiency than those that do not.  Companies widely understand that engaging with online and social tools is essential.  This creates a large market for service providers that help companies leverage this new technology efficientlyessential to their marketing efforts, and at the lowest possible cost.

In 2010, we formed Velocity Marketing, Inc. with the strategy of developing successor productsSMBs are shifting their marketing budgets from traditional media to our directory business and goal of rebuilding our customer base through mass-market sales.  This direction moved us away from the higher-end direct sales products offered through Local Marketing Experts, Inc. (search engine marketing, custom website creation, and online video products), which ceased operation in December 2010 and sold its remaining customers to ReachLocal in May 2011.  

Velocity Marketing Concepts targets monthly subscription revenue in the $30.00 to $50.00 range.  This price range, combined with the value of our offerings, results in a stable level of monthly subscription revenue without the unpredictable margin and churn issues that were associated with Local Marketing Experts.

Billing. Our billing process allows us to deliver high levels of service to our customers through convenient and timely billing and payment options.  We currently bill our customers through (i) their local exchange carrier (“LEC”), (ii) Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) billing, (iii) their credit card or (iv) direct bill invoices.

Similar to the local Regional Bell Operating Companies, we are approved to bill our products and services directly on customers’ local telephone bill through their LEC, commonly referred to as their local telephone company.  We believe that this is an efficient and cost-effective billing method as compared to direct billing methods.  

In order to bill our customers through their LECs, we are required to use one or more billing service aggregators. These aggregators have been approved by various LECs to provide billing, collection, and related services through the LECs. Under these agreements, our service aggregators bill and collect our charges to our customers through LEC billing and remit to us the proceeds, net of fees, bad debt reserves, customer returns, and unbillable accounts, typically within 90 days of submission.

We also use billing service providers to process billings via recurring direct bank account withdrawal options through ACH billings.  These service providers process direct bank withdrawals through an Automated Clearing House and remit the proceeds, net of fees and refunds to customers that cancel their service, typically within 15 days of settlement.

5


Under our contractual agreements with our LEC billing service aggregators, these third parties are entitled to withhold certain amounts from our net proceeds to serve as a security deposit or “holdbacks” or “reserves.”  Such amounts are generally remitted to us over a 12-18 month period, depending on the terms of the respective agreements.  An ACH processor maintains a fixed security deposit as a reserve.

LiveDeal Capabilities

LiveDeal has considerable capabilities in areas of online marketing and product development in addition to the features included in our current product offering.  LiveDeal is well-versed in online marketing campaign creation and management.  These areas include search engine marketing, search engine optimization, and affiliate marketing.  Our company capabilities include both mass and custom website development, as well as marketing video production.  These capabilities may be deployed at any time as part of product offerings, of our product offers or as services assisting partners or clients.
The Market - Online Local, Social and Mobile Products

LiveDeal has long offered customer acquisition services for local businesses.  Increasingly, that means offering products that make use of local, social and mobile marketing.

channels. According to BIA/Kelsey forecasts, traditional media business segments such as print advertising, Yellow Pages and newspapers are experiencing large reductionsdeclines in advertising revenues. Meanwhile, U.S. local online/digital advertising revenues, will rise to $23.3 billion in 2011, compared with $22.3 billion predicted earlier this year.

Socialwhereas social media advertising revenues will grow from $5.1 billion in 2010 to $8.2 billion in 2015, representing a compound annual growth rate of 10.0 percent, according10%. According to BIA/Kelsey’sinternet research firm ComScore, online ad spending increased to just over $30 billion in the U.S. Local Media Annual Forecast (2010-2015).

in 2011, a 20.2% increase over 2010.

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Interactive Advertising Bureau, or PWC and IAB, local online/digital advertising revenues in the United States rose 14% in the first half of 2012 and continued to rise steeply through the end of 2012. Searches for products, services or businesses constrained by geographical search parameters, such as municipality or zip code, which we refer to as local searches, are an increasingly significant segment of the online marketing industry. According to a May 2011 study, The Kelsey Group estimates that the local search market in the United States will grow from $5.7 billion in 2011 to $10.2 billion in 2016.PWC and IAB also report that revenue from search is 47% of the total internet advertising revenue.

Accordingly, many SMBs need a partner with the necessary expertise and understanding to manage evolving internet audience acquisition services. We believe that this creates a large market opportunity for nimble, reliable and reputable service providers that help companies leverage these new channels efficiently and at affordable prices.

The continued rise ofin smart phones, which now outsell traditional mobile phones, has changed the gameground rules for marketing.  Given that smart phones out-sell traditional mobile phones,online marketing, with the consumption of online advertising is quicklyrapidly moving to mobile devices.


Local mobile advertising targets users with offers or location-based marketing.   According to Borrell Associates, local advertisers are on track to spend nearly $800 million this year As of mid-2012, eMarketer anticipated that overall spending on mobile advertising in the United States, including display, search and more than $400 million onmessaging-based ads served to mobile promotions, including contests, couponsphones and deals.  Borrell’stablets, would rise to $4 billion in 2012 (a 180% increase over 2011), $7.19 billion in 2013, and nearly $21 billion by 2016. Borrell Associates’ August 2011 Mobile report projectsReport projected that the amount spent on mobile advertising will double every year for the next 5five years. That projection means thatIf borne out, in 2016, mobile advertising would exceed the amount spent on local search advertising today.

LiveDealin 2011.

We see SMBs quickly adapting to the local and mobile marketing opportunities because of the great potential to retain existing and draw in new customers at affordable prices. We anticipate that soon most online searches will be conducted using a mobile phone, which greatly increases the effectiveness of mobile marketing.

Competition

Promotional Marketing. Our promotional marketing business (including our new LiveDeal.com platform) competes for local deals with several large competitors, such as Groupon and LivingSocial, and many smaller competitors. This business is part of a new market which has operated at a substantial scale for only a limited period of time. We expect competition in this market to continue to be active inincrease because no significant barriers to entry exist. Contracts with deal publishers typically contain exclusivity provisions which restrict SMBs from offering online solutions for small and medium sizeddeals through other outlets.

We seek desirable local businesses.


Marketing

For well over 10 years, LiveDeal has had a long-standing relationship with data and lead providers.  We are able to source the highest quality leads available and are able to focus our telemarketing efforts toward the demographics we believe will result in long term customers.

LiveDeal’s products are designed and delivered online.  LiveDeal will likely expand its customer acquisition strategy to include online marketing through search engines, ad networks and affiliate relationships.
Technology and Infrastructure

We believe best of breed technology partnerships enable the company to continually evaluate and align ourselves with the best technology solutions available. In today’s high technology world, applications and tools can be outdated in weeks let alone months. Costs associated with technology development at the risk of being outdated have encouraged us to research and attain the best product available in each of our product categories.

·Moved to favor of open, best-of-breed solutions
·Lower cost approach
·Lower development costs
·Better back-up and reliability
·Able to partner with any vendor or platform
·Plug and play approach
·Greatly improved speed to market
·Increased flexibility
·We moved to virtualized computing options to replace and maintain outdated hardware

The virtualization technology we have chosen to embrace combines the power and flexibility of information technology-as-a-service with the security and availability that organizations with mission-critical computing needs demand of their technology environment.  Because it is based on resources, not large and inflexible server units, virtualization technology allows for precise and dynamic allocation of computing resources when and where they are needed.

6


The environment leverages technology from world-class infrastructure partners such as VMware, Cisco, HP and EMC2 to achieve unmatched flexibility and control. The clustered grid architecture provides complete physical redundancy to eliminate downtime due to hardware failure. In fact, the system can move applications, operating systems, and databases across physical devices live and with no service interruption. Automated resource balancing provides continuous monitoring and optimization to ensure peak performance.  Storage is delivered on a redundant, high-performance Gigabit Ethernet-attached NAS architecture.  This allows for the addition of disks to the virtual environment in almost any combination of drive type or capacity.

End user software is web-based.  The deployment of this software allows us the maximum level of flexibility to implement strategic product and marketing partners.  Using premier SaaS (software as a service) vendors, we are able to deploy products and initiatives in a fast and efficient manner.

Billing is completed through specialized billing software.  We are able to automate and manage subscription billing via credit card, checking/ACH or LEC (local exchange carrier) billing.  We are able to bill any type of recurring subscription as well as rate usage charges giving us full pricing and package flexibility.

Our technology provides a strong but flexible framework for our operation that allows us to grow and adapt with the Market.
Competition

We operate in the highly competitive, rapidly expanding and evolving business-to-business Internet services market. Our largest competitors are LECs, which are generally known as local telephone companies, and national search engines such as Yahoo! and Google that have recently expanded their presence in the local search market. We compete with other online Yellow Pages services, website operators, advertising networks, and traditional offline media, such as traditional Yellow Pages directory publishers, television, radio, and print share advertising.  Our services also compete with many directory website production businesses and Internet information service providers.  Our audience acquisition services compete with advertising agencies and other businesses providing somewhat similar services.

The principal competitive factors in the markets in which we compete include personalization of service, easy to use directories, quality and responsiveness of search results, availability of quality content, value-added products and services and accesswhich we can provide to end-users.  We compete for advertising listings with the suppliers of Internet navigational and informational services, high-traffic websites, Internet access providers, and other media.  This competition could result in significantly lower prices for advertising and reductions in advertising revenues.  Increased competition could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Many of our competitors have greater capital resources than we have.  These capital resources could allow our competitors to engage in advertising and other promotional activities that will enhance their brand name recognition at levels we cannot match.  The LECs and national search engines also have advantages in terms of brand name recognition.

publishing partners. We believe that we are in a position to successfully compete in these marketsthis market successfully due to the unique features of our LiveDeal.com platform (as described above), our experienced sales managers, our experience at sourcing, selling and servicing large numbers of small business accounts, the comprehensiveness of our database, the effectiveness of our marketing programs, and the diversity of our publisher distribution network. Our distribution partnerships allow our clients to reach large audiences and promote their products and services in innovative ways.

6

Online Presence. Our online presence business operates in the highly competitive, rapidly expanding and evolving market for internet marketing for SMBs. Our largest competitors are local exchange carriers, which are widely known as regional telephone operators, and national search engines such as Yahoo! and Google, that are actively expanding their presence in the local search market. We compete with website designers and operators, Yellow Pages services, advertising networks and outlets, and search engine optimization, CM and SMM service providers, as well as traditional offline media, such as traditional Yellow Pages directory publishers and television, radio, and print share advertising. Our services also compete with website production businesses and internet information service providers. Our audience acquisition services compete with advertising agencies and other businesses providing somewhat similar services.

The principal competitive factors in this market include personalization of service, ease of use, quality of services, availability of quality content, value-added products and services, access to consumers, effectiveness at driving business to our clients, and price.

Many boutique firms offer services similar to our online presence marketing products. Generally these small firms cannot provide all the comprehensive services we do. However, these small firms provide many options for web design, social media marketing, internet marketing, and search engine optimization.

Because of efficiencies stemming from our proprietary software and business structure, we are generally able to provide these services at a lower recurring cost and with lower upfront charges to commence a complete marketing campaign and build a client’s mobile-optimized website.

We also compete against larger companies which offer a similar or more expanded set of products. Our principal competitive advantages over these companies are our lower prices and the better quality and service of our website design, particularly our web app platform. We believe our combination of outstanding service and low cost will enable us to provide a suite of attractive packages to our clients. 

General. Many of our competitors have access to greater capital resources than we do. These resources could enable our competitors to engage in advertising and other promotional activities that will enhance their brand name recognition and market share. We believe, however, that our products provide a simple and affordable way of creatingfor our clients to create a web presence to market their products and services to local audiences. We further believe that we can compete effectively by continuing to provide quality services at competitive prices and by actively developing new products and services for customerspotential clients that enable us to become a one-stop shopsingle vendor for allthe online marketing needs of SMBs.

Intellectual Property

Our success will depend significantly on our ability to develop and maintain the small business regardlessproprietary aspects of our technology and operate without infringing upon the price point.


Employees

Asintellectual property rights of September 30, 2011,third parties. We currently rely primarily on a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions, and similar measures to protect our intellectual property.

We estimate that reliance upon trade secrets and unpatented proprietary know-how will continue to be our principal method of protecting our trade secrets and other proprietary technologies. While we had 12 full-timehave hired third-party contractors to help develop our proprietary software and no part-time employeesto provide various fulfillment services, we generally own (or have permissive licenses for) the intellectual property provided by these contractors. Our proprietary software is not substantially dependent on any third-party software, although our software does utilize open source code. Notwithstanding the use of this open source code, we do not believe our usage requires public disclosure of our own source code nor do we believe the use of open source code will have a material impact on our business.

We register some of our product names, slogans and logos in the United States. NoneIn addition, we generally require our employees, contractors and many of those with whom we have business relationships to sign non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements. Neither intellectual property laws, contractual arrangements, nor any of the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property, can ensure that third parties will not exploit our technologies or develop similar technologies.

Our proprietary publishing system provides an advanced set of integrated tools for design, service, and modifications to support our mobile web app services. Our mobile web app builder software enables easy and efficient design, end user modification and administration, and includes a variety of other tools accessible by our team members.

Employees

As of December 2, 2013, we had 21 full-time employees and one part-time employee in the United States, none of whom is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

7

Corporate History

We were originally incorporated in Nevada in 1996 as Renaissance Center, Inc. We started in the online marketing industry with YP.com, which had introduced the print yellow pages to the internet. We moved into the online classifieds business when we acquired LiveDeal, Inc., a California corporation, in June 2007, and changed our corporate name to LiveDeal, Inc. in August 2007.

On July 10, 2007, we acquired a Manila, Philippines-based call center to provide telemarketing services to support our directory services business. In February 2008, we commenced sales of higher-end direct sales products which focused on search engine marketing, website creation services and add-on advertising products. We sold the YP.com domain in March 2009, and in June 2009 discontinued our classifieds business and the operations at our Philippines-based call center.

In March 2010, we began mass market sales of a suite of internet-based, local search driven, customer acquisition services for small businesses using local exchange carrier, or LEC, billing channels, and curtailed sales of our employees are coveredhigher-end direct sales products. In July 2010, we rebranded our traditional yellow page directory service as InstantProfile® and upgraded our services to provide online subscription tools and services to broadcast information about a business to the most popular internet directories, search engines, social media networks, and Points-of-Interest (POI) databases embedded on the leading navigational devices, as well as a communication suite that enabled both conference call hosting and electronic fax services. On December 1, 2010, we ceased all new sales of our higher-end direct sales products, and in May 2011 we assigned all remaining customers in that business segment to ReachLocal, Inc. On July 15, 2011, we discontinued all new sales of our InstantProfile® product while we evaluated our sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs, but we continue to service existing customers.

In August 2012 we acquired substantially all of the assets of LiveOpenly, Inc., which sourced, published and sold discounted goods and services offered by any collective bargaining agreements.

SMBs.

In addition to our renewed marketing efforts for LiveDeal.com and our other online presence and promotional marketing product lines described above, in the past fiscal year we have continued our efforts to reduce our and streamline our operations. We also intend to seek additional investment and working capital that will enable us to continue to expand and improve our product offerings and grow our revenues.

Available Information

We regularly file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”),SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any other filings required by the SEC. We make these reports available free of charge in the investor relations section of our corporate website (http://investor.livedeal.com) our annual report on form 10-K, quarterly reports on form 10-Q, current reports on form 8-K, and all amendments to those reportsir.livedeal.com/) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. References to the Company’sour corporate website address in this report are intended to be inactive textual references only, and none of the information contained on our website is part of this report or incorporated in this report by reference.

The public may readinspect and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The publicYou may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference roomRoom by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements,You may also access these materials, and other information regarding issuers like us that file information electronically with the SEC.


SEC, from the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov/.

Recent Developments

Engagement Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (At-The-Market Offering)

On January 7, 2014, we entered into an Engagement Agreement (the “Engagement Agreement”) with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (“Chardan”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell up to a maximum aggregate amount of 660,000 shares of our common stock from time to time through Chardan as our sales agent, under our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Engagement Agreement will be sold.

Upon delivery of a placement notice by the Company, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Engagement Agreement, Chardan may sell the common stock by any method that is deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions at market prices on the NASDAQ Capital Market, in block transactions, through privately negotiated transactions, or as otherwise agreed by Chardan and us. Chardan will act as sales agent on a commercially reasonable efforts basis consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations and the rules of NASDAQ.

The offering pursuant to the Engagement Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (i) the sale of all shares of common stock subject to the Engagement Agreement, or (ii) termination of the Engagement Agreement as permitted therein. The Engagement Agreement may be terminated by Chardan or us at any time upon 15 days’ notice to the other party.

8

We will pay Chardan a commission equal to up to 3% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the common stock sold through Chardan pursuant to the Engagement Agreement and reimburse Chardan up to $15,000 in expenses. We have also provided Chardan with customary indemnification rights. No assurance can be given that we will sell any shares under the Engagement Agreement, or, if we do, as to the price or amount of shares that we will sell, or the dates on which any such sales will take place.

The foregoing description of the Engagement Agreement contained herein does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Engagement Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 1.1 and incorporated herein by reference. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also incorporates by reference the Engagement Agreement into our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Engagement Agreement will be sold.

On January 9, 2014, we delivered a placement notice to Chardan to sell 12,200 shares of our common stock as part of the at-the-market offering. The shares were sold for approximately $8.93 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $109,000. Net proceeds to us, after payment of Chardan’s 3% commission was approximately $106,000.

Convertible Note Transaction ($5 Million Line of Credit)

On January 7, 2014, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Kingston Diversified Holdings LLC (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Investor agreed to purchase for cash up to $5,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s Convertible Notes (“Notes”). The Purchase Agreement and the Notes, which are unsecured, provide that all amounts payable by the Company to the Investor under the Notes will be due and payable on the second (2nd) anniversary of the date of the Purchase Agreement (the “Maturity Date”).

The Purchase Agreement and the Notes provide that:

Either the Company or the Investor will have the right to cause the sale and issuance of Notes pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, provided that NASDAQ’s approval of the Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby is a condition precedent to each party’s right to cause any borrowings to occur under the Purchase Agreement.
Each Note must be in a principal amount of at least $100,000.
The Notes are issuable at a 5% discount and will accrue interest at an annual interest rate equal to 8%. All interest will be payable on the Maturity Date or upon the conversion of the applicable Note.
The Company has the option to prepay each Note, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty.
Either the Company or the Investor may elect at any time on or before the Maturity Date to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under any Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price applicable to any such conversion will be an amount equal to 70% of the lesser of: (i) the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of the Purchase Agreement (i.e., $9.35 per share); or (ii) the 10-day volume weighted average closing bid price for the common stock, as listed on NASDAQ for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of conversion (the “Average Price”); provided, however, that in no event will the Average Price per share be less than $1.00. For example, if the Average Price is $0.50 per share, then for purposes of calculating the conversion price, the Average Price per share would be $1.00 per share instead of $0.50 per share.
If either party elects to convert all or any portion of any Note, the Company must issue to the Investor on the date of the conversion a warrant (“Contingent Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the number of shares issuable upon conversion. This number of shares is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits or combinations, stock dividends, certainpro rata distributions, and certain fundamental transactions. Each Contingent Warrant will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years following the date of its issuance at an exercise price equal to 110% of the conversion price of the applicable Note (with the exercise price being subject to adjustment under the same conditions as the number of shares for which the warrant is exercisable.) The Contingent Warrants provide that they may be exercised in whole or in part and include a cashless exercise feature.
The Notes provide that, upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, all amounts payable to the Investor will become immediately due and payable without any demand or notice. The events of default (“Events of Default”) which trigger the acceleration of the Notes include (among other things): (i) the Company’s failure to make any payment required under the Notes when due (subject to a three-day cure period), (ii) the Company’s failure to comply with its covenants and agreements under the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and any other transaction documents, and (iii) the occurrence of a change of control with respect to the Company.

7
9


The Company (i) is required to provide certain financial and other information to the Investor from time to time, (ii) must maintain its corporate existence, business, assets, properties, insurance and records in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Purchase Agreement, (iii) with certain exceptions, must not incur or suffer to exist any liens or other encumbrances with respect to the Company’s property or assets, (iv) must not make certain loans or investments except in compliance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, and (v) must not enter into certain types of transactions, including dispositions of its assets or business.
The Company agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable, any approvals of the Company’s stockholders required under applicable law or NASDAQ Listing Rules in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement. Unless and until any such stockholder approvals are obtained, in no event will the Investor be entitled to convert any Notes and/or exercise any Contingent Warrants to the extent that any such conversion or exercise would result in the Investor acquiring in such transactions a number of shares of the Company’s common stock exceeding 19.99% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Company’s entry into the Purchase Agreement.
The Investor will be entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price for any Note(s) issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of one or more Notes, the conversion price for such Note(s) will be adjusted downward pursuant to its terms (subject to a floor of $0.70 per share). If any such dilutive issuance occurs after the conversion of one or more Notes, the Investor will be entitled to be issued additional shares of common stock for no consideration, and to an adjustment of the exercise price payable under the applicable Contingent Warrant(s). With respect to each Note actually issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Investor’s anti-dilution rights will expire two (2) years following the date of issuance.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and the Contingent Warrants contained herein does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of such documents, copies of which are attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 10.10, 10.11 and 10.12, respectively, and incorporated herein by reference

2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

On January 7, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of distribution equivalent rights, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, performance stock, performance units, restricted ordinary shares, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, tandem stock appreciation rights and unrestricted ordinary shares to our officers, employees, directors, consultants and advisors. The Company has reserved up to 600,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c), the Company intends to seek stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors


An investment in our common stock involves a substantial degree of risk. Before making an investment decision, you should give careful consideration to the following risk factors in addition to the other risks and information containeddescribed in this report. The following risk factors, however, may not reflect all of the risks associated with our business or an investment in our common stock. The trading price of our common stock could decline significantly due to any of these risks and investors may lose all or part of their investments. In assessing these risks, investors should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year that ended on September 30, 20112012 and related notes.


Risks Related to Our Business

Our management, personnel, strategic partners, and products and services are relatively new.

Our management team, many of our business and strategic partners, and a large majority of our personnel are relatively new to our company. On July 15, 2011, we discontinued all sales of our prior principal product line, InstantProfile, while we commenced an evaluation of our sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs. In December 2011, we sold a controlling interest in our company to an unaffiliated group of new investors. In January 2012, our board appointed Jon Isaac, who is the owner of one of the December 2011 investors, as President and CEO. Since that time, the company has hired a new management team, implemented a new company strategy, designed new products and services around that strategy, hired new personnel and formed new business relationships to implement that strategy.

The products and services we are currently offering, as well as our current marketing practices, are new and are still being developed and tested for market acceptance, which cannot be assured. Our management team is in the process of actively evaluating and attempting to improve our marketing efforts and our product and service offerings, as well as contracting with new partners and hiring and training personnel for management, sales and fulfillment. Any new product offering is subject to certain risks, including customer acceptance, competition, product differentiation, challenges relating to economies of scale and the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, including management and designers. Many of our contracts with third party vendors, including our strategic partnerships, permit our partners to terminate the contract, with short or no prior notice, for convenience, as well as in the event we default under the terms of the contract for failing to meet our contractual obligations.

10

The development of new products involves considerable costs and any new product may not generate sufficient consumer interest and sales to become a profitable brand or to cover the costs of its development and subsequent promotions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and grow our current offerings, or any other new offerings, to a point where they will become profitable, or generate positive cash flow. We may modify or terminate our current product and services offerings if our management determines that they are not yielding or will not yield desired results.

Our product introductions and improvements, along with our other marketplace initiatives, are designed to capitalize on customer demands and trends. In order to be successful, we must anticipate and react to changes in these demands and trends, and to modify existing products or develop new products or processes to address them.

Uncertainty in the market for our products and services.


The

Our current product and service offerings are new, and the demand and market acceptance for ourthese products and services may be subject to a high level of uncertainty.   Our existing and futureis uncertain. Potential customers may not adoptsubscribe to our current offerings or continue to use our Internet-baseother online marketing servicesproducts and other online services that we may offer in the future. Customers we acquire may not continue to use our products and services or other online marketing products and services that we may offer in the future, including because they find our Internet-based marketingthese products and services to be too costly, ineffective or less effective for meeting their business needs than other methods of advertising and marketing. Our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations will be materially and adversely affected if we do not execute our strategy or our products and services are not adopted by a sufficient number of customers.


We will incur operating losses and significant volatility in operations while we develop our new business segment.

offerings.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011,2013, we incurred substantial operating losses as we transitionedcontinued to transition our business toward our new strategic focus. We will continue to incur operating losses as we develop new business products which will be financed through existing cash on hand plus potential additional debt or equity funding received December 12, 2011.financings. While we believe our existing cash on hand, together with additional cash generated from operations or obtained from other sources, such other sources of cash possibly includingas stock issuances, loans and advances from our existing LEC clearing houses through their current advance programs or other forms of financing, secured by or leveraged off our accounts receivable based on existing programs in place that are being offered to companies similar to ours, is sufficient to finance our operations (including working capital and needed capital expenditures) for the next twelve months, there can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability or positive operating cash flows.

To the extent that we cannot achieve profitability or positive operating cash flows, our business will be materially and adversely affected. Further, thisour new business segment islines are likely to experience significant volatility in itstheir respective revenues, operating losses,results, personnel, involved, products or services for sale, and other business parameters, as management implements its strategies and responds to operating results from this new business segment.


results.

We have historically incurred losses and expect to incur losses in the future, which may impact our ability to implement our business strategystrategies and adversely affect our financial condition.

condition.

We have a history of losses. We had a net loss of $5.5$5.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011,2013, and $7.5$1.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. We2012. While we have significantly reduced our operating expenses by reviewing all expenses and improving operating efficiencies. We cannot assure you thatefficiencies, we will be profitable or generate sufficient profits from operations in the future. If our revenue does not grow, we may experience a loss in one or more future periods. We may not be able to reduce or maintain our expenses in response to any decrease in our revenue,revenues, which may impact our ability to implement our new business strategystrategies and would adversely affect our financial condition.

We are losing our LEC billing channels.  

We have historically billed a significant amount of our legacy business revenues through LEC billing channels. The largest LEC billing companies ceased billing for third parties in 2012. We anticipate that the three remaining LEC billing companies will also cease processing for third parties as of the end of 2012. If we are not able to obtain alternative billing methods for these customers, the number of customers and our revenues will decline, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.


We have sold a significant portion of our assets and customer list associated with our directory services business.

During fiscal 2009, as part of our changing business strategy, we sold our primary URL, www.yp.com, as well as a portion of our customer list.  Further, certain fulfillment contracts were terminated during the fiscal year 2009. These transactions will continue to result in a significant loss of future revenue which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

As a result of the cessation of billing of the accounts subject to these sales or terminations of billing contracts during the fiscal year 2009, the reserves held by the LEC processors, and carried by us as accounts receivable, are no longer increasing as a result of continued billing for services provided to directory business customers. Further, the LEC processors continue to deduct their expenses from these reserves. We have made reasonable estimates of these potential expenses over the expected period of collection of these reserve amounts held-back by the LEC processors. However, it is possible that the actual expenses billed by the LEC processors in the future could vary significantly from the estimates made by the Company, thereby affecting the amounts collectible from the booked accounts receivable.

The discontinuance of our classifieds and Direct Sales businesses could adversely impact our financial condition.

In fiscal year 2009 we made the strategic decision to discontinue our classifieds business and product offerings which have historically generated a majority of our revenues and in December 2010 we made the strategic decision to discontinue our Direct Sales business.  These discontinuances will continue to reduce our revenues that were generated from these product lines, particularly with respect to those customers who sought an integrated Yellow Pages and classifieds product.  

8


If we fail to maintain the number of customers purchasing our monthly subscription products, our revenue and our business could be harmed.

Our monthly subscription customers do not have long-term obligations to purchase our products or services and many will cancel their subscriptions each month. As a result of this customer churn, we must continually add new monthly subscription customers to replace customers who cancelled and to grow our business beyond our current customer base.

In addition, as the result of the discontinuation of LEC billing services in o2012 noted above, we anticipate that we will lose a material number of subscribers. If we do not add sufficient new subscribers to compensate for these lost subscribers, our operating results and our financial performance may be materially and adversely affected.

11

Our senior management lacks substantial experience implementing our business strategy and most of our personnel has been recently hired.

Our senior management’s track record and achievements in their respective prior endeavors are not necessarily indicative of future results that will be achieved by them on our behalf. Our senior management’s skills, experience and expertise may not be as well suited to our current objectives, strategies and requirements as they were in their respective prior businesses. In particular, our most senior management is relatively inexperienced in marketing services to SMBs and in providing online marketing services, and our products and services, marketing strategy, operating environment and regulatory limitations differ markedly from the other businesses which our senior management has managed and operated. In addition, the great majority of our personnel, including our management, has been hired relatively recently, and there can be no assurance that they will be able to work together effectively or provide the necessary level of services to succeed in implementing our current business strategies.

We face intense competition, including from companies with greater resources, which could adversely affect our growth and could lead to decreased revenues.


Search engine optimization

Content marketing and other online marketing services are emerging fields with a considerable amount of competitors in each field. Additionally, major InternetMajor internet companies, including Google, Microsoft, Verizon, AT&T and Yahoo!, currently market Internetinternet Yellow Pages, local search services and other products that directly compete with our legacy business as well as our new product offerings. offerings and major deal companies, like Groupon and Living Social, currently market daily deals that directly compete with our promotional marketing business. Other existing and potential competitors include website design and development service and software companies; internet service providers and application service providers; internet search engine providers; domain registrars; website hosting providers; local business directory providers; and ecommerce platform and service providers.

We may not compete effectively with existing and potential competitors for several reasons, including the following:


 §·some competitors have longer operating histories, larger and more established subscriber bases, and greater financial and other resources than we have and are in better financial condition than we are;are, enabling them to engage in more extensive research and development, more aggressive pricing policies, and more advertising and other promotional activities that will enhance their brand name recognition and increase their market share;

 §·some competitors may release free tools, including open source tools, which perform some or many of the services we offer to our customers;

·some competitors have better name recognition or reputations, as well as larger, more established, and more extensive marketing, customer service, and customer support capabilities than we have;

 §·some competitors may be able to better adapt to changing market conditions and customer demand; and

 §·barriers to entry are not significant.  As a result, other companies that are not currentlysignificant, and new competitors may enter the marketour markets or develop technologytechnologies that reduces the need for our services.

Increased competitive pressure could lead to reduced market share, as well as lower prices and reduced margins, for our services.  If we experience reductions

As a result of an anticipated increase in competition in our revenue for any reason, our margins may continue to decline, which would adversely affect our resultsmarkets, and the likelihood that some of operations.  We cannot assure you that wethis competition will be able to compete successfully in the future.

Many of our competitors have greater capitalcome from companies with more established brands and resources than us, we have.  These capital resources could allow our competitors to engage in advertising and other promotional activities that will enhance theirbelieve brand name recognition and reputation will become increasingly important. If we are not successful in quickly building brand awareness, we could be placed at levels we cannot match.  The LECs and national search engines also have advantages in terms of brand name recognition.

a competitive disadvantage to companies whose brands are more recognizable than ours.

Our business is subject to a strictan uncertain and developing regulatory environment.


Like many companies, we are subject to existing and potential government regulation. There are, however, comparatively

While relatively few laws orand regulations apply specifically applicable to Internet businesses. Accordingly,internet businesses, the application of existingother laws and regulations to Internetinternet businesses, including ours, is unclear in many instances. There remains significant legal uncertainty in a variety of areas, including but not limited to:intellectual property, user privacy, the positioning of sponsored listings on search results pages, defamation, taxation, the provision of paid-search advertising to online gaming websites, the legality of sweepstakes, promotions and gaming websites generally,product liability, and the regulation of content in various jurisdictions.


Compliance with federal laws relating to the Internetinternet and Internetinternet businesses may impose upon us significant costs and risks, or may subject us to liability if we do not successfully comply with their requirements, whether intentionally or unintentionally. Specific federal laws that impact our business include The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, The Communications Decency Act of 1996, The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (including related Federal Trade Commission regulations), The Protect Our Children Act of 2008, and The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, among others. For example, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which is in part intended to reduce the liability of online service providers for listing or linking to third-party websites that include materials that infringe the rights of others, was adopted by Congress in 1998. If we violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act we could be exposed to costly and time-consuming copyright litigation.

12

There are a growing number of legislative proposals before Congress and various state legislatures regarding privacy issues related to the Internet generally, and some of these proposals apply specifically to paid-search businesses. We are unable to determine if and when such legislation may be adopted. If certain proposals were to be adopted, our business could be harmed by increased expenses or lost revenue opportunities, and other unforeseen ways. We anticipate that new laws and regulations affecting us will be implemented in the future. Those new laws, in addition to new applications of existing laws, could expose us to substantial liabilities and compliance costs.

Our utilization of ACH billing exposes us to review by the National Automated Clearing House Association, or NACHA.Association. Future actions from these and other regulatory agencies could expose us to substantial liability in the future, including fines and criminal penalties, preclusion from offering certain products or services, and the prevention or limitation of certain marketing practices.


9

Our

Existing laws and regulations and any future resultsregulation may have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, we believe that our direct marketing programs meet existing requirements of operations may bethe Federal Trade Commission, or FTC. Any changes to FTC requirements or changes in our direct or other marketing practices, however, could result in our marketing practices failing to comply with FTC regulations, or could require us to change our marketing strategies or practices, which could adversely impact our ability to acquire new clients.

The application of certain laws and regulations to our promotional marketing business, as a new product category, is uncertain. These include federal and state laws governing considered gift cards, gift certificates, stored value cards or prepaid cards, such as the federal Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, or the CARD Act, and unclaimed and abandoned property laws. Numerous class action lawsuits that have been filed in federal and state court claiming that vouchers used in promotional marketing are subject to fluctuationthe CARD Act and various state laws governing gift cards and that the defendants have violated these laws by issuing vouchers with expiration dates and other restrictions. If we are required to alter our promotional marketing business practices as a result of seasonality.


any laws and regulations, our revenue could decrease, our costs could increase and our business could otherwise be harmed. In particular, we expectaddition, the costs and expenses associated with defending any actions related to such additional laws and regulations and any payments of related penalties, judgments or settlements could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations for the fourth quarter may demonstrate seasonal weakness because a larger portion of online consumer traffic and advertising is typically focused on holiday gift purchases and there is less advertising for locally-focused services during this quarter. Additionally, as other advertisers significantly increase their bid prices to acquire traffic for the holiday season, we generally keep our bid prices consistent throughout the year, resulting in less traffic to our websites from our SEM efforts. Online consumer traffic will also be lower due to increased holidays and vacation time during this quarter. We generally see an increase in revenue during the first quarter, when we expect to benefit from a higher volume of locally-focused traffic and a higher volume of online consumer traffic due to fewer holidays and vacation time.

operations.

Our success depends upon our ability to establish and maintain relationships with our customers.


Our ability to generate revenue depends upon our ability to maintain relationships with our existing customers, to attract new customers to sign up for revenue-generating products and services, and to generate traffic to our customers’ websites. We primarily use telemarketing efforts to attract new customers. These telemarketing efforts may not produce satisfactory results in the future. We attempt to maintain relationships with our customers through customer service and delivery of traffic to their businesses. An inability to either attract additional customers to use our service or to maintain relationships with our customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.


If we do not introduce new or enhanced offerings to our customers, we may be unable to attract and retain those customers, which would significantly impede our ability to generate revenue.


We willmay need to introduce new or enhanced products and services in order to attract and retain customers and to remain competitive. Our industry hasindustries have been characterized by rapid technological change, changes in advertiser and user requirements and preferences, and frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies.technologies and business logic. These changes could render our technology, systems, and website obsolete.services obsolete or uncompetitive. We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent us from introducing new or enhanced products and services. If we do not periodically enhance our existing products and services, develop new technologies that address our customers’ and users’ needs and preferences, or respond to emerging technological advances and industry standards and practices on a timely and cost-effective basis, our products and services may not be attractive to customers andor their users, which would significantly impede our revenue growth. In addition, our reputation and our brand could be damaged if any new or enhanced product or service introduction is not favorably received.


Our results of operations could fluctuate due to factors outside of our control.

Our operating results have historically fluctuated significantly, and we have experienced recent declines in net revenues and operating profits.  We could continue to experience fluctuations or continuedrevert to declining operating results due to factors that may or may not be within our control. Such factors include the following:

 §·fluctuating demand for our services, which may depend on a number of factors including:

 -§changes in economic conditions and our customers’ profitability,

 -§changes in technologies favored by consumers,

§customer refunds or cancellations, and

 -§our ability to continue to bill through existing means;

 §·market acceptance of new or enhanced versions of our services or products;

 §·price competition or pricing changes by us or our competitors;


13
 

§·new product offerings or other actions by our competitors;

 §·the ability of our check processing service providers to continue to process and provide billing information;

 §·the amount and timing of expenditures for expansion of our operations, including the hiring of new employees, capital expenditures, and related costs;

 §·technical difficulties or failures affecting our systems or the Internetinternet in general;

 §·a decline in Internetinternet traffic at our website; and

 §·the fixed nature of a significant amount of our operating expenses.

10


The loss of our ability to bill customers through our ACH billing channel would adversely impact our results of operations.


We bill a significant number of our Directory Services customersclients through our ACH billing channel. ACH transactions are closely regulated by NACHA – the National Automated Clearing House Association, which develops operating rules and business practices for the ACH network and for electronic payments in the areas of Internetinternet commerce and other electronic payment means. Changes in these rules and business practices could compromise our ability to bill a significant number of our customers through ACH billing, and we would have to transition these customers to other billing channels. Such changes would be disruptive and could result in lost revenue.


We depend upon our executive officersclients and key personnel.

Our performance depends substantially on the performance of our executive officers and other key personnel.  The success of our business in the future will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain, and motivate high quality personnel, especially highly qualified technical and managerial personnel.  The loss of services of any executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. While we have employment agreements with our executive officers no key man life insurance has been purchased on them.

Competition for talented personnel is intense, and there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract, train, retain or motivate other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future.  In addition, market conditions may require us to pay higher compensation to qualified management and technical personnel than we currently anticipate.  Any inability to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

We depend upon third parties to provide certain services and software, and our business may suffer if the relationships upon which we depend fail to produce the expected benefits or are terminated.

We depend upon third-party software to operate certain of our services.  The failure of this software to perform as expected would have a material adverse effect on our business.  Additionally, although we believe that several alternative sources for this software are available, any failure to obtain and maintain the rights to use such software would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.  We also depend upon third parties to provide services that allow us to connect to the Internet with sufficient capacity and bandwidth so that our business can function properly and our websites can handle current and anticipated traffic.  Any restrictions or interruption in our connection to the Internet would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not be able to secure additional capital to expand our operations.

Although we currently have no material long-term needs for capital expenditures, we will likely be required to make increased capital expenditures to fund our anticipated growth of operations, infrastructure, and personnel.  We currently anticipate that our cash on hand as of September 30, 2011, together with cash flows from operations or obtained from other sources, such other sources of cash possibly including stock issuances, loans and advances from our existing LEC clearing houses through their current advance programs or other forms of financing secured by or leveraged off our accounts receivable based on existing programs in place that are being offered to companies similar to ours will be sufficient to meet our anticipated liquidity needs for working capital and capital expenditures over the next 12 months.  In the future, however, we may seek additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity depending upon our results of operations, market conditions or unforeseen needs or opportunities.  Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the following:

§the pace of expansion of our operations;

§our need to respond to competitive pressures; and

§future acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties and actual results could vary materially as a result of the factors described above.  As we require additional capital resources, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities.  Debt financing must be repaid at maturity, regardless of whether or not we have sufficient cash resources available at that time to repay the debt.  The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders. We cannot provide assurance that any financing arrangements will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Our business is subject to a strict regulatory environment.

Existing laws and regulations and any future regulation may have a material adverse effect on our business.  For example, we believe that our direct marketing programs meet existing requirements of the United States Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”).  Any changes to FTC requirements or changes in our direct or other marketing practices, however, could result in our marketing practices failing to comply with FTC regulations.

11


There can be no absolute assurance that the other states or other parties, which were not part of the above-mentioned state consortium, would not attempt to file similar claims against us in the future.  However, we believe this risk is somewhat mitigated by the fact that those states did not join the states in filing complaints against us and the fact that we discontinued the use of our check activators.

Our utilization of ACH billing exposes us to review by NACHA.  Future actions from these and other regulatory agencies could expose us to substantial liability in the future, including fines and criminal penalties, preclusion from offering certain products or services, and the prevention or limitation of certain marketing practices.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights.

Our success depends both on our internally developed technology and our third party technology. We rely on a variety of trademarks, service marks, and designs to promote our brand names and identity.  We also rely on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures, and trademark, copyright, trade secrecy, unfair competition, and other intellectual property laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our products and services.  Legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability, and scope of the protection of certain intellectual property rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property and may not prevent our competitors from gaining access to our intellectual property and proprietary information.  In addition, we cannot provide assurance that courts will always uphold our intellectual property rights or enforce the contractual arrangements that we have entered into to protect our proprietary technology.

Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, and other proprietary rights.  Any such infringement or misappropriation could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.  In addition, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights is unclear.  We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise decrease the value of our trademarks and other proprietary rights, which may result in the dilution of the brand identity of our services.

We may decide to initiate litigation in order to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights.  Any such litigation could result in substantial expense, may reduce our profits, and may not adequately protect our intellectual property rights.  In addition, we may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that our products or services infringe their intellectual property rights.  Any such claim or litigation against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and harm our reputation.  In addition, such claims or litigation could force us to do one or more of the following:

§cease selling or using any of our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, which would adversely affect our revenue;

§obtain a license from the holder of the intellectual property right alleged to have been infringed, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; and

§redesign or, in the case of trademark claims, rename our products or services to avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may not be possible and in any event could be costly and time-consuming.
Even if we were to prevail, such claims or litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend, and could result in the diversion of our management’s time and attention.  These expenses and diversion of managerial resources could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

Capacity constraints may require us to expand our infrastructure and advertiser support capabilities.

Our ability to provide high-quality services largely depends upon the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications systems.  We may be required to expand our technology, infrastructure, and customer support capabilities in order to accommodate any significant growth in customers.  We may not be able to project accurately the rate or timing of increases, if any, in the use of our services or expand and upgrade our systems and infrastructure to accommodate these increases in a timely manner.  Our inability to upgrade and expand our infrastructure and customer support capabilities as required could impair the reputation of our brand and our services and diminish the attractiveness of our service offerings to our customers.

Any expansion of our infrastructure may require us to make significant upfront expenditures for servers, routers, computer equipment, and additional Internet and intranet equipment, as well as to increase bandwidth for Internet connectivity.  Any such expansion or enhancement will need to be completed and integrated without system disruptions.  An inability to expand our infrastructure or customer service capabilities either internally or through third parties, if and when necessary, would materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

12


Current economic conditions may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.

The U.S. and global economy is currently undergoing a gradual and extended recovery from a prolonged recession and a period of unprecedented volatility.  It is unclear how prolonged this recovery will be and how it will affect our industry in particular. Many believe that the general future economic environment may continue to be less favorable than that of recent years.  If the challenging economic conditions in the U.S. and other key countries persist or worsen, our customers may delay or reduce spending.  This could result in reductions in sales of our products and services, longer sales cycles and increased price competition.  Any of these events would likely harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may have an adverse resolution of litigation that may harm our operating results or financial condition.

At times, we are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business.  Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations.  Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural catastrophic events and to interruption by man-made problems such as computer viruses or terrorism.

Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks, acts of war, human errors, break-ins and similar events. For example, a significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition, and our insurance coverage will likely be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our servers may also be vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could lead to interruptions, delays, loss of critical data or the unauthorized disclosure of confidential intellectual property or client data. We may not have sufficient protection or recovery plans in certain circumstances, such as natural disasters affecting the Las Vegas area, and our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. As we rely heavily on our servers, computer and communications systems and the Internet to conduct our business and provide high quality customer service, such disruptions could negatively impact our ability to run our business, which could have an adverse affect on our operating results and financial condition.

We have made strategic acquisitions and divestitures in the past few years and may complete similar transactions in the future and cannot assure you that any future transactions will be successful.

We regularly look for opportunities to support our new business strategy through appropriate acquisitions, divestitures and/or strategic alliances.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying appropriate transaction partners or integrating the results of any such transactions in a way that ultimately supports our business strategy.  Any such transactions could also involve the dilutive issuance of equity securities and/or the incurrence of debt.  In addition, future strategic transactions may involve numerous other risks, including but not limited to:

§exposure to unanticipated liabilities of an acquired company (or acquired assets);

§the potential loss of key customers or key personnel in connection with, or as the result of, a transaction;

§
the recording of goodwill and intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges;

§the diversion of the attention of our management team from other business concerns, including the day-to-day management of our Company and/or the internal growth strategies that they are currently implementing; and

§the risk of entering into markets or producing products where we have limited or no experience, including the integration of the purchased technologies and products with our technologies and products.

Risks Related to the Internet

We may not be able to adapt as the Internet and customer demands continue to evolve.

Our failure to respond in a timely manner to changing market conditions or client requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. The Internet, e-commerce, and the online marketing industry are characterized by:

§rapid technological change;

§changes in customer and user requirements and preferences;

13


§
frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies; and

§the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our existing service offerings, technology, and hardware and software infrastructure obsolete.
In order to compete successfully in the future, we must:
§enhance our existing services and develop new services and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our prospective or current customers;

§license, develop or acquire technologies useful in our business on a timely basis; and

§respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis.

We may be required to keep pace with rapid technological change in the Internet industry.

In order to remain competitive, we will be required continually to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our existing services, which could require us to invest significant capital.  If our competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing services, technologies, and systems may become obsolete.  We may not have the funds or technical knowledge to upgrade our services, technologies, and systems.  If we face material delays in introducing new services, products, and enhancements, our customers and users may forego the use of our services and select those of our competitors, in which event our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Regulation of the Internet may adversely affect our business.

Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet and online services such as online Yellow Pages, federal, state, local, and foreign governments may adopt laws and regulations, or amend existing laws and regulations, with respect to the Internet and other online services.  These laws and regulations may affect issues such as user privacy, pricing, content, taxation, copyrights, distribution, and quality of products and services.  The laws governing the Internet remain largely unsettled, even in areas where legislation has been enacted.  It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws, such as those governing intellectual property, privacy, libel, and taxation apply to the Internet and Internet advertising and directory services. In addition, the growth and development of the market for electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business over the Internet.  Any new legislation could hinder the growth in use of the Internet generally or in our industry and could impose additional burdens on companies conducting business online, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our services, increase our cost of doing business, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain Internet domain names that we would like to have.

We believe that our existing Internet domain names are an extremely important part of our business.  We may desire, or it may be necessary in the future, to use these or other domain names in the United States and abroad.  Various Internet regulatory bodies regulate the acquisition and maintenance of domain names in the United States and other countries.  These regulations are subject to change. Governing bodies may establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names.  As a result, we may be unable to acquire or maintain relevant domain names in all countries in which we plan to conduct business in the future.

The extent to which laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights will be extended to protect domain names currently is not clear.  We therefore may be unable to prevent competitors from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise decrease the value of our domain names, trademarks, trade names, and other proprietary rights.  We cannot provide assurance that potential users and customers will not confuse our domain names, trademarks, and trade names with other similar names and marks.  If that confusion occurs, we may lose business to a competitor and some customers and users may have negative experiences with other companies that those customers and users erroneously associate with us.  The inability to acquire and maintain domain names that we desire to use in our business, and the use of confusingly similar domain names by our competitors, could have a material adverse affect on our business, prospects, financial conditions, and results of operations in the future.

Our business could be negatively impacted if the security of the Internet becomes compromised.

To the extent that our activities involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information about our customers or users, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability.  We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches or to minimize problems caused by security breaches.  Our security measures may not prevent security breaches. Our failure to prevent these security breaches or a misappropriation of proprietary information may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

14


Our technical systems could be vulnerable to online security risks, service interruptions or damage to our systems.

Our systems and operations may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, sabotage, computer viruses, penetration of our network by unauthorized computer users or “hackers,” natural disaster, and similar events.  Preventing, alleviating, or eliminating computer viruses and other service-related or security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service.  We may need to expend significant resources protecting against the threat of security breaches or alleviating potential or actual service interruptions.  The occurrence of such unanticipated problems or security breaches could cause material interruptions or delays in our business, loss of data, or misappropriation of proprietary or IAP advertiser-related information or could render us unable to provide services to our customers for an indeterminate length of time.  The occurrence of any or all of these events could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are sued for content distributed through, or linked to by, our website or those of our customers, we may be required to spend substantial resources to defend ourselves and could be required to pay monetary damages.

We aggregate and distribute third-party data and other content over the Internet.  In addition, third-party websites are accessible through our website or those of our customers. As a result, we could be subject to legal claims for defamation, negligence, intellectual property infringement, and product or service liability.  Other claims may be based on errors or false or misleading information provided on or through our website or websites of our directory licensees.  Other claims may be based on links to sexually explicit websites and sexually explicit advertisements.  We may need to expend substantial resources to investigate and defend these claims, regardless of whether we successfully defend against them.  While we carry general business insurance, the amount of coverage we maintain may not be adequate.  In addition, implementing measures to reduce our exposure to this liability may require us to spend substantial resources and limit the attractiveness of our content to users.
If our security measures are breached and unauthorized access is obtained to a client’s data, our service may be perceived as not being secure and clients may curtail or stop using our service.
Our service involves the storage and transmission of clients’ proprietary information, such as credit card and bank account numbers, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation and possible liability. Our payment services may be susceptible to credit card and other payment fraud schemes, including unauthorized use of credit cards, debit cards or bank account information, identity theft or merchant fraud.
If our security measures are breached in the future as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to our clients’ data, our reputation will be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and clients.
revenue.

We are subject to a number of risks related to credit card payments we accept. If we fail to be in compliance with applicable credit card rules and regulations, we may incur additional fees, fines and ultimately the revocation of the right to use the credit card company, which would havepayments.

We bill a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

A majoritylarge portion of our clients’ campaigns were paid forclients using a credit card orand debit card.cards. For credit and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating expenses and adversely affect our net income. We are also subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. We believe we are compliant with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard, which incorporates Visa’s Cardholder Information Security Program and MasterCard’s Site Data Protection standard. However, there is no guarantee that we will maintain such compliance or that compliance will prevent illegal or improper use of our payment system. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit and debit card payments from our clients. A failure to adequately control fraudulent credit card transactions would result in significantly higher credit card-related costs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We depend upon our executive officers and key personnel.

Our performance depends substantially on the performance of our executive officers and other key personnel. The success of our business in the future will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain, and motivate high quality personnel, especially highly qualified sales, technical and managerial personnel. The loss of services of any executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. We do not have term employment agreements with, or key man life insurance covering, any of our executive officers.

Competition for talented personnel is intense, and there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to attract, train, retain or motivate highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future. In addition, market conditions may require us to pay higher compensation to qualified management and technical personnel than we currently anticipate. Any inability to attract and retain qualified management and technical personnel in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

We depend upon third parties to provide certain services and software, and our business may suffer if the relationships upon which we depend fail to produce the expected benefits or are terminated.

We depend upon third-party software to operate certain of our services. The failure of this software to perform as expected could have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, although we believe that several alternative sources for this software are available, any failure to obtain and maintain the rights to use such software could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. We also depend upon third parties who provide the cloud computing services which host our customers’ websites, including the mobile web apps, to be sufficiently reliable and provide sufficient capacity and bandwidth so that our business can function properly and our customers’ websites are responsive to current and anticipated traffic. Any restrictions or interruption in those providers’ services or connection to the internet could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. If we are forced to switch hosting facilities, we may not be successful in finding an alternative service provider on acceptable terms or in hosting the required computer servers and implementing the required technology ourselves. We may also be limited in our remedies against these providers in the event of a failure of service.

14

We expect that our anticipated future growth, including through potential acquisitions, may strain our management, administrative, operational and financial infrastructure, which could adversely affect our business.

We anticipate that significant expansion of our present operations will be required to compensate for the loss of clients related to the cessation of LEC billing and to capitalize on potential growth in market opportunities, and that this expansion will place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. We expect to add a significant number of additional key personnel in the future, including key managerial, sales and technical employees who will have to be fully integrated into our operations. In order to manage our growth, we will be required to continue to implement and improve our operational, marketing and financial systems, to expand existing operations, to attract and retain superior management and personnel, and to train, manage and expand our employee base. We may not be able to expand our operations effectively, our systems, procedures and controls may be inadequate to support our expanded operations, and our management may fail to implement our business plan successfully.

We may not be able to secure additional capital to expand our operations.

Although we currently have no material long-term needs for capital expenditures, we will likely be required to make increased capital expenditures to fund our anticipated growth of operations, infrastructure, and personnel. In the future, we may need to seek additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity, depending upon our results of operations, market conditions or unforeseen needs or opportunities. Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including:

·the pace of expansion of our operations;

·our need to respond to competitive pressures; and

·future acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or businesses.

The sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders. We cannot provide assurance that any financing arrangements will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights.

Our success depends both on our internally developed technology and licensed third party technology. We rely on a variety of trademarks, service marks, and designs to promote our brand names and identity. We also rely on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures, and trademark, copyright, trade secrecy, unfair competition, and other intellectual property laws to protect the proprietary aspects of our products and services. Legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability, and scope of the protection of certain intellectual property rights in internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our intellectual property and may not prevent our competitors from gaining access to our intellectual property and proprietary information. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that courts will always uphold our intellectual property rights or enforce the contractual arrangements that we have entered into to obtain and protect our proprietary technology.

Third parties, including our partners, contractors or employees, may infringe or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, and other proprietary rights. Any such infringement or misappropriation could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, the relationship between regulations governing domain names and laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights is unclear. We may be unable to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise decrease the value of our trademarks and other proprietary rights, which may result in the dilution of the brand identity of our services.

We may decide to initiate litigation in order to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights. Any such litigation could result in substantial expense, and may not adequately protect our intellectual property rights. In addition, we may be exposed to future litigation by third parties based on claims that our products or services infringe or misappropriate their intellectual property rights. Any such claim or litigation against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and harm our reputation. In addition, such claims or litigation could force us to do one or more of the following:

·cease selling or using any of our products and services that incorporate the subject intellectual property, which would adversely affect our revenue;

·attempt to obtain a license from the holder of the intellectual property right alleged to have been infringed or misappropriated, which license may not be available on reasonable terms; and

·attempt to redesign or, in the case of trademark claims, rename our products or services to avoid infringing or misappropriating the intellectual property rights of third parties, which may be costly and time-consuming.

15

Even if we were to prevail, such claims or litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to prosecute or defend, and could result in the diversion of our management’s time and attention. These expenses and diversion of managerial resources could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be subject to intellectual property claims that create uncertainty about ownership or use of technology essential to our business and divert our managerial and other resources.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to operate without infringing the intellectual property rights of others. Third parties may, in the future, claim our current or future services, products, trademarks, technologies, business methods or processes infringe their intellectual property rights, or challenge the validity of our intellectual property rights. We may be subject to patent infringement claims or other intellectual property infringement claims that would be costly to defend and could limit our ability to use certain critical technologies or business methods. We may also become subject to interference proceedings conducted in the patent and trademark offices of various countries to determine the priority of inventions.

The defense and prosecution, if necessary, of intellectual property suits, interference proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings can become very costly and may divert our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. We may not prevail in any of these suits or proceedings. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could require us to pay substantial compensatory and exemplary damages, could restrain us from using critical technologies, business methods or processes, and could result in us losing, or not gaining, valuable intellectual property rights.

Furthermore, due to the voluminous amount of discovery frequently conducted in connection with intellectual property litigation, some of our confidential information could be disclosed to competitors during this type of litigation. In addition, public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments in the litigation could be perceived negatively by investors, and thus have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

We may be required to expand or upgrade our infrastructure.

Our ability to provide high-quality services largely depends upon the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications systems. We (or our third party service providers) may be required to expand or upgrade our (or their) technology, infrastructure, fulfillment capabilities, or customer support capabilities in order to accommodate any significant growth in customers or to replace aging or faulty equipment or technologies. We (or they) may not be able to project accurately the rate or timing of increases, if any, in the use of our services or expand and upgrade our (or their) systems and infrastructure to accommodate these increases in a timely manner.

Any expansion of our (or our third party service providers’) infrastructure may require us (or them) to make significant upfront expenditures for servers, routers, computer equipment, and additional internet and intranet equipment, as well as to increase bandwidth for internet connectivity. Any such expansion or enhancement may cause system disruptions.

Our (or our third party service providers’) inability to expand or upgrade our technology, infrastructure, fulfillment capabilities, customer support capabilities or equipment as required or without disruptions could impair the reputation of our brand and our services and diminish the attractiveness of our service offerings to our clients.

We may have an adverse resolution of litigation that may harm our operating results or financial condition.

At times, we are a party to lawsuits. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit could require us to pay substantial damages or to comply with court orders that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition.

We may fail to retain existing merchants, or add new merchants, in our promotional marketing business.

Our promotional marketing business depends in part on our strategic partners to publish discounted products and services we source from our SMB clients. We depend on our ability to attract and retain SMBs that are prepared to offer products or services on compelling terms through our strategic partners. We are a recent entrant to this market and we do not have long-term arrangements to guarantee the availability of deals that offer attractive quality, value and variety to consumers or favorable payment terms to us. We must continue to attract and retain merchants in various geographical areas to our promotional marketing business in order to increase revenue and achieve profitability. If new merchants do not find our marketing and promotional services effective, or if existing merchants do not believe that utilizing our products provides them with a long-term increase in customers, revenues or profits, they may stop making offers through us. In addition, we may experience attrition in our merchants in the ordinary course of business resulting from several factors, including losses to competitors and merchant closures or bankruptcies. If we are unable to attract new merchants in numbers sufficient to grow our promotional marketing business, or if too many merchants are unwilling to offer products or services with compelling terms through our strategic partners, or to offer favorable payment terms to us, we may sell fewer daily deals and our operating results will be adversely affected.

16

Our promotional marketing business depends heavily on our strategic partners.

Our promotional marketing business is highly dependent upon our ability to sell discounted products and services offered by our SMB clients through our strategic partners. Unlike many of our established competitors, we currently lack a significant subscriber base for selling these offers to potential customers of these SMB clients. Instead, we rely on our strategic partners, some of whom have extremely large user bases, to publish these offers to reach these potential customers. We do not have long-term relationships with these strategic partners. Our agreements with these strategic partners generally permit our partners to terminate the agreement with short or no prior notice, for convenience, and/or do not require our partners to publish the offers we source from our SMB clients.

Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fires, floods and other natural catastrophic events and to interruption by man-made problems such as computer viruses or terrorism.

Our service systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, fires, floods, power losses, telecommunications failures, terrorist attacks, acts of war, human errors, break-ins and similar events. For example, a significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition, and our insurance coverage will likely be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. Our servers may also be vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized tampering with our computer systems, which could lead to interruptions, delays, loss of critical data or the unauthorized disclosure of confidential intellectual property or client data. We may not have sufficient protection or recovery plans in certain circumstances, such as natural disasters affecting the Las Vegas or San Diego area, and our business interruption insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for losses that may occur. As we rely heavily on our servers, computer and communications systems and the internet to conduct our business and provide high quality customer service, such disruptions could negatively impact our ability to operate our business, which could have a material and adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We have made strategic acquisitions and divestitures in the past few years and may complete similar transactions in the future and cannot assure you that any future transactions will be successful.

As part of our business strategy, we have acquired a number of businesses and assets, including our recent acquisition of LiveOpenly, Inc., and we regularly look for opportunities to support our new business strategy through appropriate acquisitions, divestitures and strategic alliances. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying appropriate transaction partners or integrating the acquired businesses into our operations in a way that ultimately supports our business strategy or revenues. We may enter into additional acquisitions, business combinations or strategic alliances in the future. Acquisitions may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, use of our cash resources, incurrence of debt and amortization of expenses related to intangible assets acquired. In addition, the process of integrating an acquired company, business or technology, which requires a substantial commitment of resources and management’s attention, may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The acquisition of a company or business is accompanied by a number of risks, including:

·exposure to unanticipated liabilities of an acquired company (or acquired assets);

·difficulties integrating or developing acquired technology into our services or acquired products or services into our operations, and unanticipated expenses or disruptions related to such integration;

·the potential loss of key partners or key personnel in connection with, or as the result of, a transaction;

·the impairment of relationships with clients of the acquired business, or our own clients, partners or employees, as a result of any integration of operations or the expansion of our offerings;

·the recording of goodwill and intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges;

·the diversion of the attention of our management team from other business concerns, including the day-to-day management of our businesses or the internal growth strategies that we are currently implementing;

·the risk of entering into markets or producing products where we have limited or no experience, including the integration or removal of the acquired or disposed technologies and products with or from our existing technologies and products; and

·the inability properly to implement or remediate internal controls, procedures and policies appropriate for a public company at businesses that prior to our acquisition were not subject to federal securities laws and may have lacked appropriate controls, procedures and policies.

17

We may not be able to adapt as the internet, mobile technologies and customer demands continue to evolve.

The internet, e-commerce, the online marketing industry and mobile devices are characterized by:

·rapid technological change;

·changes in customer and user requirements and preferences;

·frequent new product and service introductions embodying new technologies and business logic; and

·the emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render our existing service offerings, technology, and hardware and software infrastructure obsolete.

In order to compete successfully in the future, we must:

·enhance our existing services and develop new services and technology that address the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our prospective or current customers;

·license, develop or acquire technologies useful in our business on a timely basis; and

·respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely basis.

Our failure to respond in a timely manner to changing market conditions or client requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business could be negatively impacted if the security of our or our partners’ equipment becomes compromised.

To the extent that our activities involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information about our customers or users, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches or to minimize problems caused by security breaches. Our (or our third party service providers’) security measures may not prevent security breaches. The failure to prevent these security breaches or a misappropriation of proprietary information may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are not able to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial results, which could cause our stock price to fall or result in our stock being delisted.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial reports. We will need to devote significant resources and time to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley with respect to internal control over financial reporting. In addition, Section 404 under Sarbanes-Oxley requires that we assess the design and operating effectiveness of our controls over financial reporting. Our ability to comply with the annual internal control report requirement will depend on the effectiveness of our financial reporting and data systems and controls across our company and our operating subsidiaries. We expect these systems and controls to become increasingly complex to the extent that we integrate acquisitions and our business grows. To effectively manage this complexity, we will need to continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation or operation of these controls, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations, which could adversely affect our business and jeopardize our listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market, either of which would harm our stock price.

Risks Related to the Internet

We may be unable to keep pace with rapid technological change in the internet industry.

In order to remain competitive, we will be required continually to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our existing products and services, which could require us to invest significant capital or make substantial changes to our personnel, technologies or equipment. If our competitors introduce new products and services embodying new technologies or if new industry standards and practices emerge, our existing services, technologies, and systems may become obsolete or uncompetitive. We may not have the funds or technical knowledge to upgrade our services, technologies, or systems. If we face material delays in introducing new or enhanced products and services, our customers and users may select those of our competitors, in which event our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

18

Regulation of the internet may adversely affect our business.

The laws governing the internet remain largely unsettled, even in areas where legislation has been enacted. It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws, such as those governing intellectual property, privacy, defamation, product liability, and taxation apply to the internet and internet services. Unfavorable resolution of these issues may substantially harm our business and operating results.

Due to the increasing popularity and use of the internet and online services such as online Yellow Pages, federal, state, local, and foreign governments may adopt laws and regulations, or amend existing laws and regulations, with respect to the internet and other online services. These laws and regulations may affect issues such as user privacy, pricing, content, taxation, copyrights, distribution, product liability and quality of products and services. In addition, the growth and development of the market for electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may impose additional burdens on companies conducting business over the internet, including those covering user privacy, data protection, spyware, “do not email” lists, “do not call” lists, access to high speed and broadband service. Other laws and regulations that have been adopted, or may be adopted in the future, that may affect our business include pricing, taxation (including sales, value-added and other transactional taxes), tariffs, patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, export of encryption technology, electronic contracting, click-fraud, acceptable content, search terms, lead generation, behavioral targeting, consumer protection, and quality of products and services. Any new legislation could hinder the growth in use of the internet generally or in our industry and could impose additional burdens on companies conducting business online, which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our products and services, increase our cost of doing business, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may not be able to obtain internet domain names that we would like to have.

We believe that our existing internet domain names are an extremely important part of our business. We may desire, or it may be necessary in the future, to use these or other domain names in the United States and internationally. Various internet regulatory bodies regulate the acquisition and maintenance of domain names in the United States and other countries. These regulations are subject to change. Governing bodies may establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names. As a result, we may be unable to acquire or maintain relevant domain names in all countries in which we plan to conduct business in the future.

The extent to which laws protecting trademarks and similar proprietary rights will be extended to protect domain names currently is not clear. We therefore may be unable to prevent competitors from acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon or otherwise decrease the value of our domain names, trademarks, trade names, and other proprietary rights. We cannot provide assurance that potential users and customers will not confuse our domain names, trademarks, and trade names with other similar names and marks. If that confusion occurs, we may lose business to a competitor and some customers and users may have negative experiences with other companies that those customers and users erroneously associate with us.

Our technical systems could be vulnerable to online security risks, service interruptions or damage to our systems.

Our (or our third party service providers’) systems and operations may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, sabotage, computer viruses, penetration of our network by unauthorized computer users or “hackers,” natural disaster, and similar events. Preventing, alleviating, or eliminating computer viruses and other service-related or security problems may require interruptions, delays or cessation of service. We may need to expend significant resources protecting against the threat of security breaches or alleviating potential or actual service interruptions. The occurrence of such unanticipated problems or security breaches could cause material interruptions or delays in our business, loss of data, or misappropriation of proprietary information or could render us unable to provide services to our customers for an indeterminate length of time. The occurrence of any or all of these events could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

If we are sued for content distributed through, or linked to by, our website or those of our customers, we may be required to spend substantial resources to defend ourselves and could be required to pay monetary damages.

We aggregate and distribute third-party data and other content over the internet. In addition, third-party websites are accessible through our website or those of our customers. As a result, we could be subject to legal claims for defamation, negligence, intellectual property infringement, product or service liability or other torts. Other claims may be based on errors or false or misleading information provided on or through our website or websites of our customers, or on links to sexually explicit or gambling websites and sexually explicit advertisements. We may need to expend substantial resources to investigate and defend these claims, regardless of whether we successfully defend against them. While we carry general business insurance, the amount of coverage we maintain may not be adequate. In addition, implementing measures to reduce our exposure to this liability may require us to spend substantial resources and limit the attractiveness of our products or services to users.

19

If our security measures are breached and unauthorized access is obtained to a client’s data, our service may be perceived as not being secure and clients may curtail or stop using our service.

Our service may involve the storage and transmission of clients’ proprietary information, such as credit card and bank account numbers, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss of this information, litigation and possible liability. Our payment services may be susceptible to credit card and other payment fraud schemes, including unauthorized use of credit cards, debit cards or bank account information, identity theft or merchant fraud.

If our security measures are breached in the future as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, and as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to our clients’ data, our reputation could be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liabilities. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and frequently are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and clients.

Our revenue may be negatively affected if we are required to charge sales tax or other transaction taxes on all or a portion of our past and future sales to customers located in jurisdictions where we are currently not collecting and reporting tax.

We generally do not charge, collect or have imposed upon us sales, value added (VAT) or other transaction taxes related to the products and services we sell, except for certain corporate level taxes and transaction level taxes outside of the United States. However, many states,the federal, state, and local jurisdictionsgovernments or one or more foreign countries may seek to impose sales or other transaction tax obligations on us in the future. A successful assertion by any state, localtax jurisdiction or country in which we do business that we should be collecting sales or other transaction taxes on the sale of our products or services, or the adoption of new laws to require us to collect such taxes, could result in substantial tax liabilities related to past sales, create increased administrative burdens or costs, discourage clientscustomers from purchasing or continuing to purchase products or services from us, decrease our ability to compete or otherwise substantially harm our business and results of operations. The imposition of new laws requiring the collection of sales or other transaction taxes on the sale of our products or services (or the introduction of new products or services that are subject to existing transaction taxes) could create increased administrative burdens or costs, discourage clients from purchasing products or services from us, decrease our ability to compete or otherwise substantially harm our business and results of operations.


15

Government regulation of the Internet is evolving, and unfavorable changes could substantially harm our business and operating results.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as regulations and laws specifically governing the Internet. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede the growth in use of the Internet and online services. The application of existing laws to the Internet and online services governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy has not yet been settled. Unfavorable resolution of these issues may substantially harm our business and operating results. Other laws and regulations that have been adopted, or may be adopted in the future, that may affect our business include those covering user privacy, data protection, spyware, “do not email” lists, access to high speed and broadband service, pricing, taxation, tariffs, patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, export of encryption technology, electronic contracting, click-fraud, acceptable content, search terms, lead generation, behavioral targeting, consumer protection, and quality of products and services. Any changes in regulations or laws that hinder growth of the Internet generally or that decrease the acceptance of the Internet as a communications, commercial and advertising medium could adversely affect our business. See also Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors— If the technology that we currently use to target the delivery of online advertisements is restricted or becomes subject to regulation, our expenses could increase and we could lose clients.”

Risks Related to Our Securities


We have experienced difficulties maintaining compliance with applicable requirements for the continued listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market, and any future failure to comply with such requirements could result in the delisting of common stock from that trading market.

During our 2011 fiscal year, we fell out of compliance with certain requirements for the continued listing of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, including the requirements that we maintain (i) at least 500,000 “publicly held” shares of common stock (i.e., shares not held by directors, officers or 10% stockholders), (ii) at least $2.5 million of stockholders’ equity, and (iii) a market value of our “publicly held” shares of at least $1.0 million. While we obtained a notice from NASDAQ on August 23, 2012 that we regained compliance with the applicable listing rules, and on November 30, 2012 that we were removed from further compliance monitoring, we can provide no assurance that we will remain in compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements, or that our common stock will continue to be traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market or any other market.

Stock prices of technology companies have declined precipitously at times in the past and the trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading price of our common stock has been highly volatile over the past few years and investors could experience losses in response to factors including the following, many of which are beyond our control:

 §·decreased demand in the Internetinternet services sector;

 §·variations in our operating results;

 §·announcements of technological innovations or new products or services by us or our competitors;

 §·changes in expectations of our future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;

 §·our failure to meet analysts’ expectations;

 §·changes in operating and stock price performance of other technology companies similar to us;


20
 

§·conditions or trends in the technology industry, the online marketing industry or the mobile device industry;

 §·additions or departures of key personnel;personnel or strategic partners; and

 §·future sales of our debt or equity securities, including common stock.

Domestic and international stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with securities trading in those markets. These fluctuations, as well as political events, terrorist attacks, threatened or actual war, and general economic conditions unrelated to our performance, may adversely affect the price of our common stock. In the past, securities holders of other companies often have initiated securities class action litigation against those companies following periods of volatility in the market price of those companies’ securities. If the market price of our stock fluctuates and our stockholders initiate this type of litigation, we could incur substantial costs and experience a diversion of our management’s attention and resources, regardless of the outcome. This could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our stock price may be volatile, and the value of an investment in our common stock may decline.

An active, liquid and orderly market for our common stock may not be developed or sustained, which could depress the trading price of our common stock.

The trading price of our common stock may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

our operating performance and the operating performance of similar companies;

the overall performance of the equity markets;

·our operating performance and the operating performance of similar companies;

·the overall performance of the equity markets;

·the number of shares of our common stock publicly owned and available for trading;

·threatened or actual litigation;

·changes in laws or regulations relating to our solutions;

·any major change in our Board of Directors or management;

·publication of research reports about us or our industry or changes in recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts;

·large volumes of sales of our shares of common stock by existing stockholders; and

·general political and economic conditions.

Due to our concentrated stock ownership, public stockholders may have no effective voice in our management and the trading price of our common stock publicly owned and available for trading;


threatened or actual litigation;

16


changes in laws or regulations relating tomay be adversely affected.

Three stockholders beneficially own approximately 60.9% of our solutions;


any major change in our board of directors or management;

publication of research reports about us or our industry or changes in recommendations or withdrawal of research coverage by securities analysts;

large volumes of sales of ouroutstanding shares of common stock, by existing stockholders; and

general political and economic conditions.
In addition,one of them, our CEO, is the beneficial owner of approximately 39.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Each of these three stockholders also has a contractual right to nominate one member of our Board of Directors. These stockholders, collectively, have the ability to determine the outcome of the election of directors at our annual meetings and to determine the outcome of many significant corporate transactions, such as mergers, consolidations, dissolutions or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, many of which only require the approval of a majority of our voting power. These stockholders may have interests that differ from other stockholders and may vote in a way with which other stockholders disagree and which may be adverse to other stockholders’ interests. Moreover, such a concentration of voting power could have the effect of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring us at a premium. This significant concentration of share ownership may also adversely affect the trading price for our common stock marketbecause investors often perceive disadvantages in general, and the market for Internet-relatedowning stock in companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatilitywith concentrated stock ownership.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the overall market andforeseeable future.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future due to our limited funds for operations. Therefore, any return on your investment would likely come only from an increase in the market pricevalue of a company’s securities. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in very substantial costs, divert our management’s attention and resources and harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the recent distress in the financial markets has also resulted in extreme volatility in security prices.common stock.

21

Certain provisions of Nevada law, in our organizational documents and in our chartercontracts to which we are party may prevent or delay a change of control of our company.


company.

We are subject to the Nevada anti-takeover laws regulating corporate takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Nevada corporations from engaging in a merger, consolidation, sales of its stock or assets, and certain other transactions with any stockholder, including all affiliates and associates of the stockholder, who owns 10% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date that the stockholder acquired 10% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, except in certain situations. In addition, our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws include a number of provisions that may deter or impede hostile takeovers or changes of control or management. These provisions include the following:


 §·the authority of our boardBoard of Directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, and privileges of these shares, without stockholder approval;

 §·stockholders must comply with advance notice requirements to transact any business at the annual meeting;

·all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and not by written consent, unless such action or proposal is first approved by our boardBoard of directors;Directors;

 §·special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, or the President of our company; and

 §·a director may be removed from office only for cause by the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power entitled to vote at an election of directors;

·our Board of Directors is expressly authorized to alter, amend or repeal our bylaws;

·newly-created directorships and vacancies on our Board of Directors may only be filled by a majority of remaining directors, and not by our stockholders; and

·cumulative voting is not allowed in the election of our directors.

These provisions of Nevada law and our articles and bylaws could prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change of control of our company and may discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to our stockholders.

In addition, provisions in a Securities Purchase Agreement we entered into in December 2011 grant each of three of our stockholders the right to nominate one member of our Board of Directors.

Our common stock may be subject to the “penny stock” rules as promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act.


Act of 1934.

In the event that no exclusion from the definition of “penny stock” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is available, then any broker engaging in a transaction in our common stock will be required to provide its customers with a risk disclosure document, disclosure of market quotations, if any, disclosure of the compensation of the broker-dealer and its sales person in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market values of our securities held in the customer’s accounts. The bid and offer quotation and compensation information must be provided prior to effecting the transaction and must be contained on the customer’s confirmation of sale. Certain brokers are less willing to engage in transactions involving “penny stocks” as a result of the additional disclosure requirements described above, which may make it more difficult for holders of our common stock to dispose of their shares.

We have experienced difficulties maintaining compliance with applicable requirements for the continued listing of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, and any future failure to comply with such requirements could result in the delisting of common stock from that trading market.

During fiscal 2011, the Company fell out of compliance with certain requirements for the continued listing of its common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market, including the requirements that the Company maintain (i) at least 500,000 “publicly held” shares of common stock (i.e., shares not held by directors, officers or 10% stockholders), (ii) at least $2.5 million of stockholders’ equity and (iii) a market value of its “publicly held” shares of at least $1.0 million.  As of the date of this filing, the Company has addressed all of those compliance issues, and on December 21, 2011, the Company received written notification from NASDAQ indicating that the Company’s securities will continue to be listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market based upon the Company’s compliance with the terms of a NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel decision, which required the Company to evidence compliance with the applicable minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 million by December 12, 2011.  Accordingly, a NASDAQ hearing process that was initiated during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 is now closed.  The Company is subject to further compliance monitoring by NASDAQ until November 30, 2012.

17


Notwithstanding the foregoing compliance issues, the Company’s common stock has been continuously listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market without interruption.  In order to preserve its listing status, the Company must remain in compliance with all applicable NASDAQ listing requirements, including but not limited to the requirements described above.  There can be no assurance that the Company will remain in compliance with such listing requirements, or that our common stock will continue to be traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market or any other market.  For more information, refer to Note 17 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements, as well as our other filings with the SEC.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments


Not applicable.

22

ITEM 2. Properties


We entered into a long-term lease, which began in November 2007, for a 12,635 square foot facility in

Our principal executive and administrative offices are located at 6240 McLeod Drive, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada, that functions aswhere we lease approximately 2,500 square feet of space in the headquarters and operating facilityMcLeod Business Park. Our current monthly rent is approximately $2,500, subject to annual increases. Our lease for LiveDeal, Inc. and our subsidiaries.  We pay rent of approximately $315,000 annually underthis space ends on November 30, 2015; however, we have the option to extend the lease for two additional lease terms of three years each. We also lease approximately 11,000 square feet of space located at 325 East Warm Springs Road, Suite 100, Las Vegas Nevada, which expires on December 31, 2012.  We believe that this facility is adequate for our current and anticipated future needs and that this facility and its contents are adequately covered by insurance. We have subleased a substantial portion of this facilitywe utilize as our requirementscall center. We currently pay approximately $13,000 in monthly rent for the call center, which is subject to annual increases. Our lease for this space ends on approximately February 29, 2016; however, we have diminished.


the option to extend the lease for two additional lease terms of three years each. Our San Diego executive office is located at 12520 High Bluff Drive, San Diego, California, where we utilize approximately 1,600 square feet of space in Plaza Del Mar. This office is currently being provided to us by a company that is a related party to the Isaac Capital Group LLC, one of our largest stockholders which is owned by Jon Isaac, our President and CEO and one of our directors.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings


Except as described below, as of September 30, 2011, we wereare not a party to, and none of our property was the subject of, any material pending material legal proceedings, other than claims that arise in the normal conduct ofordinary routine litigation incidental to our business. While we currently believe that the ultimate outcome of these routine proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If anAn unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility ofcould result in a material adverse impact on our net income and financial condition in the period in which a ruling occurs. Our estimate of the potential impact of the following legal proceedings on our financial position and our results of operationMoreover, routine litigation, even if not meritorious, could changeresult in the future.


expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources and could adversely affect our net income and financial condition.

Global Education Services, Inc. v. LiveDeal, Inc.


On June 6, 2008, Global Education Services, Inc. ("GES"), which we refer to as GES, filed a consumer class actionfraud lawsuit against us in the Company in King County (Washington) Superior Court in the State of Washington, alleging that the Company'sour use of activator checks violated the Washington Consumer Protection Act.Act and seeking class certification pursuant to Washington law. GES seekssought injunctive relief against the Company'sour use of theactivator checks, as well as judgmentdamages in an amount equal to three times the alleged damages allegedly sustained by the members of the class. LiveDealputative class, exemplary damages for the alleged violation of law and its fees and costs. We denied the allegations and iscommenced defending the litigation.

Early in 2010, the Court denied both parties’ dispositive motions, after oral argument.   Afterat which time they commenced settlement discussions faileddiscussions. The parties reached a settlement and entered into a settlement agreement on or about November 5, 2012. The settlement agreement required $150,000 to result in resolution,be paid to plaintiff’s counsel, $10,000 to be paid to GES as the parties resumed“representative plaintiff” and $70 to be paid to each eligible class member. The Court granted final approval of the settlement on April 26, 2013 and the Court’s order became final on May 27, 2013. All class member claims have been paid and the last attorneys’ fee payment was made on November 23, 2013. Accordingly, the litigation is fully resolved and the matter closed.

J3 Harmon LLC v. LiveDeal, Inc.

On February 9, 2012, J3 Harmon LLC, which we refer to as J3, filed a lawsuit against us in the fallSuperior Court for Maricopa County in the State of 2011. GES’ motionArizona, alleging breach of a commercial lease agreement. J3 sought damages for class certification is briefedalleged unpaid rents during the lease term as well as alleged damages for storage costs after the expiration of the lease term. We denied the allegations and scheduled to be heard on January 27, 2012. The parties continue to discuss settlement pending hearingasserted various affirmative defenses. In September 2012, the Maricopa County Superior Court entered a judgment in favor of J3 in the sum of $62,886.13.   We appealed this judgment.

On October 1, 2013, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part on the motion.


principal damages and remanded the matter for judgment. Subsequently, the Maricopa County Superior Court entered Judgment on Mandate against the Company in the principal sum of $46,636.31 and attorneys’ fees of $5,624.40, with post-judgment interest from October 3, 2012. There is no further basis for appeal by the Company. The Company anticipates paying the judgment during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2014 and, upon such payment, the matter will be resolved. As of September 30, 2013, we maintained an accrual of $52,261 related to this.

ITEM 4. (Removed and Reserved)


Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

23
18


PART II


ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Our Common Stock


Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “LIVE”.


The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale prices per share of our common stock during the last two fiscal years.   All prices have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split that was completed on September 7, 2010 and the forward stock split that was completed on August 10, 2011.

   Quarter Ended  High  Low 
2010  December 31, 2009  $22.61  $11.12 
   March 31, 2010  $16.15  $5.20 
   June 30, 2010  $7.98  $4.75 
   September 30, 2010  $7.04  $3.15 
2011  December 31, 2010  $21.14  $4.06 
   March 31, 2011  $6.83  $3.33 
   June 30, 2011  $4.48  $2.34 
   September 30, 2011  $3.23  $1.50 

  Quarter Ended High  Low 
         
2012 December 31, 2011 $7.37  $1.02 
  March 31, 2012 $7.19  $2.59 
  June 30, 2012 $15.57  $3.87 
  September 30, 2012 $18.58  $3.38 
           
2013 December 31, 2012 $5.34  $3.04 
  March 31, 2013 $4.10  $2.11 
  June 30, 2013 $3.43  $2.51 
  September 30, 2013 $5.19  $2.38 

Holders of Record


On December 1, 2011,January 6, 2014, there were approximately 176154 holders of record of our common stock according to our transfer agent. The Company hasWe have no record of the number of stockholders who hold their stock in “street name” with various brokers.


Dividend Policy


We have one class of authorized preferred stock (Series E Preferred Stock), of which there are currently 127,840 shares issued and outstanding. Each share of Series E Preferred Stock is entitled to and receives a dividend of $0.015 per year. At September 30, 2011,2013, we had accrued but unpaid dividends totaling approximately $12,000. $15,821.

Presently, we do not pay dividends on our common stock. The timing and amount of future dividend payments byon our Company,common stock, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors based upon our earnings, capital requirements and financial position, general economic conditions, alternative uses of capital, and other pertinent factors.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

During theour fiscal yearquarter ended September 2011 the company did not purchase30, 2013, neither we nor any “affiliated purchaser”, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 10b-18(a)(3)), repurchased any shares of LiveDeal stock and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, the Company acquired an aggregate of 1,341 shares of itsour common stock at market prices at an aggregate cost of $25,882.stock. At September 30, 2011 the Company2013, we had retired all but 4,252of our shares of treasury stock.


Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans


Reference is made to Note 1411 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for certain disclosures about the Company’sour equity compensation plans.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On August 22, 2013, the Company agreed to issue 15,773 shares of common stock to a software developer in exchange for services valued at an aggregate of $50,000. The per share valuation associated with the issuance was $3.17, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction. Pursuant to applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules, the share issuance is subject to stockholder approval of our new 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, which the Company intends to seek at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

24

On September 9, 2013, we issued 200,000 shares to Novalk Apps S.A.S. in exchange for certain customer relationship manager, or CRM, software assets acquired pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of the same date. Such assets were valued at an aggregate of $994,000. The per share purchase price for such shares was $4.97, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction.

On September 30, 2013, we issued 44,233 shares of common stock to John Kocmur, a member of our Board of Directors, in exchange for a cash payment of $152,160. The per share purchase price for such shares was $3.44, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction.

We offered and sold these shares without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance upon the exemption from the registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and, in certain cases, Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder. Such shares may not be offered or sold in the United States in the absence of an effective registration statement or exemption from the registration requirements under the Securities Act. An appropriate legend has been placed on the certificates we issued to represent these securities.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data


Not required for smaller reporting companies.


applicable.

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


For a description of our significant accounting policies and an understanding of the significant factors that influenced our performance during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011,2013, this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the related notes, appearing in Item 8 of this Annual Report.


19


Forward-Looking Statements

Executive Overview

OuThis portion of this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.”  These forward-looking statements are often characterized by the terms “may,” “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” or “anticipates,” and do not reflect historical facts.  Specific forward-looking statements contained in this portion of the Annual Report include, but are not limited to our (i) expectation that continued investment in online advertising to bring increased traffic to our websites will drive increased revenues; (ii) expectation that cost of sales will continue to be directly correlated to our use of the LEC billing channel and (iii) belief that our existing cash on hand,r Company

LiveDeal, Inc., which, together with additional cash generated from operationsits subsidiaries, we refer to as the “Company”, “LiveDeal”, “we”, “us” or obtained from other sources, such other sources of cash possibly including stock issuances, loans“our”,providesspecialized onlinemarketing solutionsto small-to-medium sized local businesses, or SMBs,that boost customerawareness and advances from our existing LEC clearing houses through their current advance programs or other forms of financing secured by or leveraged off our accounts receivable based on existing programs in place that are being offered to companies similar to ours; will provide us with sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needsmerchant visibility. We offer affordable tools for the next 12 months and (iv) belief that our gross profit margin and selling, general and administrative costs will support the company’s business plans and opportunities.

Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Factors and risks that could affect our results and achievements and cause them to materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include those identified in Item 1A. Risk Factors, as well as other factors that we are currently unable to identify or quantify, but that may exist in the future.
In addition, the foregoing factors may affect generally our business, results of operations and financial position.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made.  We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.  Any information contained on our website www.livedeal.com or any other websites referenced in this Annual Report are not a part of this Annual Report.

Executive Overview

Our Company
LiveDeal, Inc. provides local internet marketing services for small businesses. LiveDeal, through our wholly-owned subsidiary (Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc.), offers an affordable way for businessesSMBs to extend their marketing reach to local, relevant prospective customers via the Internet. 
LiveDeal first started in the onlineinternet. We also provide SMBs promotional marketing industry as YP.com. At the time, we were the first company to bring the print yellow pages to the Internet in 1994. From there we moved into the online classifieds business when we merged with LiveDeal in 2007.  The YP.com URL was sold March 2009 and the classifieds business was sold June 2009.
LiveDeal uses the latest technologies to deliver best-in-breed online marketing solutions to our small business customers.  We have online advertising solutions to help small businesses grow their company and realize online success. 
Summary Business Description

LiveDeal delivers affordable acquisition services to the small business segment through the InstantAgency Suite of products and services. These products are currently sold through Velocity Marketing Concepts which targets complimentary aspects of the small business market.

The InstantAgency® products include:

InstantProfile distributes a small business’ key contact and service information to the top Internet destinations (based on popularity), including the search engines, internet directories, and social media networks. This gives the advertiser the ability to manage theiroffer special deals and activities through LiveDeal.com and our online publishing partners.

Our principal offices are located at 6240 McLeod Drive, Suite 120, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120, our telephone number is (702) 939-0231, and our corporate website (which does not form part of this report) is located at www.livedeal.com. Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “LIVE”. 

Changes in Business Strategy; New Products and Services

Change in Business Strategy. We have been engaged in a significant re-evaluation of and adjustment to our business informationstrategy over the last several years. The focus of these efforts has been two-fold: first, to make our product offerings more appealing in one location and maximize their reach to the many destinations a consumer may searchevolving market for local business services.


InstantProfile’s social media platform, InstantBUZZ, not only creates a presence for the advertiser in select social media networks, it also allows them to use one location to broadcast their messages across their entire social media network. By leveraging this automation our customers eliminate the need to manage multiple logins for individual websites and duplicate submissions and decreases the time required to broadcast their messages from hours to one click of a button.

Additionally, InstantProfile customers enjoy a suite of communication tools that assist them in communicating directlyassisting SMBs with their customersonline marketing challenges; and employees. These communication tools include a conferencing solutionsecond, to host conference calls with up to 10 participants and an online electronic fax solution with unlimited faxes included.
The key attribute the InstantAgency® products and services all have in common is high value, low cost marketing options that service the many needs of the small business customer. The suite of products and services were strategically chosen service entry level products and services that can grow with the small business as it continues to grow. For those starting with the more customized products and services, InstantAgency® can continue to drive more online visitors, callers and in turn customers based on the customer budget.  Our strategic advantage is the ability to service the small business customer regardless of their budget or online knowledge.

20


Recent Events & Transactions

Financial Performance

We have embarked on a significant change in business strategy to re-emphasize our legacy business (directory services offering) and update it to meet current market requirements and move ahead of our competitors in this market segment. In connection with this re-evaluation, we terminated all new sales under our direct sales business line on December 1, 2010, and on July 15, 2011, we discontinued all new sales of our InstantProfile® product. As a result we haveof the cessation of our marketing efforts to acquire new customers, and the attrition of existing customers, our net revenues continued to experiencedecline, from $4.1 million in fiscal 2011 to $3.1 million in fiscal 2012 and $2.4 million in fiscal 2013.

Promotional Marketing and Online Presence Marketing (Velocity Local). We recently launched two new business lines under new management after a decline in revenues and gross profit over the last several quarters, but have also reduced our ongoing costs and expenses and reduced ongoing losses. Within fiscal year 2011, the quarterly losses have decreased from $1,730,000 in the first quarter to $314,000 in the fourth quarter.  While we have yet to achieve sufficient sales in our new InstantProfile business to allow us to achieve operating profitability, we began to achieve growth in revenues in this business segment during fiscal 2010 with sales officially launching in July 2010.  The company has not yet achieved profitability with the InstantProfile business and ceased sales in July 2011 in order to review and improveperiod of re-evaluating our sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs.


Change in Business Strategy

In March 2010,August 2012, we evaluatedcommenced sourcing local deal and activities to strategic publishing partners under our businessLiveDeal®brand, which we refer to as promotional marketing. In November 2012, we commenced the sale of marketing tools that help local businesses manage their online presence under our Velocity Localbrand, which we refer to as online presence marketing.

We offer our SMB customers packages of services to create and adoptedmaintain an online presence. Products and services we offer include template and custom website design, either optimized for desktop or mobile devices, social media marketing, or SMM, and content marketing, or CM. In combination, these products offer a new businesscomprehensive online marketing strategy for SMBs at affordable rates. We believe that addressed eachour online presence marketing products are useful to a large share of our business segments as separate entitiesSMBs because they enable potential customers to gain awareness of and re-launchedlocate an SMB and restructured our legacy line of business. This evaluation was necessitated by the challenges facing our Direct Sales business lines that provide Internet-based customer acquisition strategies for small business, as well as declining revenues from our traditional business line (i.e. directory services).  Additionally, current economicto learn about and regulatory forces, both generalpurchase its products and specific to our industry, impacted our consideration of our existing business model and strategy.  Some of these factors include the following:

services.

§The current effects of the recovery from the recent recession and general economic downturn;25
 

LiveDeal.com. In September 2013, we launched LiveDeal.com, which redefined the Company’s strategy and direction, centering its focus on the new LiveDeal.com platform and growing the base of restaurants utilizing the LiveDeal platform to attract new customers. LiveDeal.com is a unique, real-time “deal engine” connecting merchants with consumers. The Company believes that it has developed the first-of-its-kind web/mobile platform providing restaurants with full control and flexibility to instantly publish customized offers whenever they wish to attract customers.

Highlights of the new LiveDeal.com include:

§Our perceptiona user-friendly interface enabling restaurants to create limited-time offers and publish them immediately, or on a preset schedule that is fully customizable;
state-of-the-art scheduling technology giving restaurants the general economic downturn could lead our businessfreedom to choose the days, times and duration of the offers, enabling them to create offers that entice consumers to visit their establishment during their slower periods;
advanced publishing options allowing restaurants to manage traffic by limiting the number of available vouchers to consumers;
superior geo-location technology allowing multi-location restaurants to segment offers by location, attracting customers to seek lower-cost customer acquisition methods, primarilyslower locations while eliminating potential over-crowding at busier sites; and
a user-friendly mobile and desktop web interface allowing consumers to easily browse, download, and instantly redeem “live” offers found on LiveDeal.com based on their location.

Restaurants can sign up to use the LiveDeal platform at our website (www.livedeal.com).

We believe one of the primary challenges facing the dining industry is the inefficient and limited number of ways restaurants are able to market offers and promotions to their potential customers. Daily deal companies typically dictate offer terms, such as the discount amount and redemption details. This not only erodes potential profits for restaurant owners but could also drive traffic during already-busy periods for the restaurants. LiveDeal’s model benefits both the restaurant and the consumer because it provides the restaurant the opportunity to create any offer they choose, limit the number of potential claimants of their promotion, publish the offer on days and at times of their choosing, and provides customers with relevant offers they can easily and quickly redeem while creating a cost-effective model for LiveDeal to grow and easily scale its operations. We expect to initially derive revenues through premium placement on the site, and we are also exploring various options for monetizing the website.

The Company, best known for migrating print yellow pages to the Internet in 1994, began to develop the model for LiveDeal.com after having worked closely with well-known publishers in the daily deal market. In mid-2013, we tested the beta platform in a number of cities, and the model has been well received by restaurants, consumers, and various restaurant associations. We launched LiveDeal.com in the San Diego and Los Angeles, California markets in September 2013 and December 2013, respectively. The Company believes it can cost-effectively expand into other cities due to the scalability of the LiveDeal.com platform, as restaurants can curate deals through our account managers or create specials on their own. In addition, individual customers transact directly with the restaurant, eliminating the need for the Company to act as an intermediary in the sale.

Trends in Revenues. We continue to actively develop, revise and evaluate these products and services and our marketing strategies and procedures. We continue to generate a significant portion of our revenue from servicing our existing customers under our legacy product offerings, primarily our InstantProfile® line of products and services. Because of the change in our business strategy and product lines, we no longer accept new customers under our legacy product offerings.

Because of the infancy of our new lines of business, we have yet to generate significant revenue from our online presence marketing or our promotional marketing lines of business. Given that we have not been accepting new customers for our legacy product offerings since July 2011 and that we did not launch our new product offerings until August 2012, our revenues declined for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 as we continued to build a foundation for our new products and services and position the Company for future growth through our LiveDeal.com and Velocity Local offerings.

Employment Agreement with President and CEO

On January 13, 2012, our Board of Directors appointed Jon Isaac to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. At the time, the Company did not enter into a written Employment Agreement with Mr. Isaac, but he was paid an annual salary of $1 for his services and was eligible to receive bonuses in such forms and amounts as determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee.

On February 14, 2013, the Company entered into a written Employment Agreement with Jon Isaac, pursuant to which he will continue serving as our President and Chief Executive Officer for the period from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2016.  The material terms of the Employment Agreement are as follows:

·$200,000 annual base salary throughout the Internet;term of the Employment Agreement.

·Eligibility to receive performance-based bonuses in the sole discretion of the Company’s Compensation Committee.

26
 §The reconstitution of our management team;
§The termination of certain significant directory business contracts related to the traditional business; and
§Continuing losses in our Direct Sales business.
As a result, we made significant changes to our business strategy during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.  We decided to move our strategic focus towards our directory services business and bring it up to current market standards and regulatory requirements and away from our Direct Sales business line.   This strategy culminated in the termination of all new sales under the Direct Sales business line on December 1, 2010. In May 2011 we transferred the remaining Direct Sales customers to another company and will receive an immaterial portion of the revenues from these customers for the 24 months after the sale.
Our new strategic focus is on delivering a suite of Internet-based, local search driven, customer acquisition services for small businesses, sold via telemarketing using LEC billing channels as well as  other billing channels and targeting all segments of the SMB market through our Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc. subsidiary. The company paused new Velocity sales July 15, 2011 while we evaluate the current and future sales programs.

Discontinued Operations

As part of our strategy to evaluate each of our business segments as separate entities, management noted that the Direct Sales business segment had incurred operating losses and declining revenues and did not fit with our change in strategic direction.  Accordingly, in March 2011, we made the strategic decision to discontinue our Direct Sales business and product offerings. Prior year financial statements have been restated to present the Direct Sales business segment as a discontinued operation.

We initiated shutdown activities in March 2011 and completed such activities in May 2011.  In conjunction with the discontinued operations, we recorded the following charges in fiscal 2011:

 ·Employee contract termination chargesA one-time discretionary bonus of $7,083 reflecting$150,000 for services performed as President and Chief Executive Officer for the reductionprevious 12 months, to be paid in force of 7 employees;cash on or before March 31, 2013.  This bonus was approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee.

 ·Non cash impairment chargesReimbursement for reasonable housing expenses.

·Grant of $367,588 consistingoptions to purchase 150,000 shares of the write-offCompany’s common stock, subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates and the other terms and conditions summarized below:

o50,000 shares will vest on the first anniversary of net intangible assets;the date of grant and be exercisable for five years after vesting at an exercise price of $5.00 per share;

The Direct Sales business segment accounted for $1,341,430 and $3,838,479 of net revenues for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are now included as part of income (loss) from discontinued operations, including disposal costs, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Management Changes

On November 23, 2009, we and Richard F. Sommer, our then-current Chief Executive Officer, entered into an amendment to Mr. Sommer's Employment Agreement dated as of May 19, 2009.  This amendment, provided that Mr. Sommer was entitled to an option to purchase 26,316 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $18.53 per share, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.  The option was granted pursuant to our 2003 Stock Plan and was scheduled to vest according to the following schedule: 25% on October 29, 2010 (the first anniversary of the date of grant) and 1/36 of the remainder each month beginning on November 29, 2010.

21


Previously, the Employment Agreement provided that Mr. Sommer was entitled to a success fee payable in cash equal to 2% of the excess above $9,000,000 of any cash distributed to or received by our stockholders in the form of a dividend, in the event of liquidation or upon a change of control.  Pursuant to this amendment, that provision was deleted and replaced with the option grant described above.  Other than as described above, the original terms of Mr. Sommer’s Employment Agreement remained in full force and effect.

Effective January 2, 2010, Rajeev Seshadri resigned as our Chief Financial Officer and was replaced by Lawrence W. Tomsic.  Mr. Tomsic recently served as Controller for Alliance Residential Company, an apartment complex with 3,221 units and $90 million in annual sales.  Previously, he was a Controller and Chief Financial Officer for various clients of JKL Consulting (including a planned unit development and a concrete contractor) from 2006-2008 and Chief Financial Officer of John R. Wood, Inc. (a real estate brokerage focusing on luxury residential housing and commercial properties) from 1997-2006.  Mr. Tomsic worked as a financial officer and in other management positions for various companies (including U.S. Home Corporation and Collier Enterprises) from 1983-1997.  He was also a senior auditor for Deloitte &Touche for three years.  Mr. Tomsic earned a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Delaware and M.B.A. from the University of Denver.
On January 4, 2010, Richard Sommer resigned as our Chief Executive Officer.  As a result of his departure, Mr. Sommer also resigned as a member of our Board of Directors.  Following Mr. Sommer’s departure, Kevin A. Hall was appointed as our interim Chief Operating Officer (COO).  Mr. Hall had been serving as our General Counsel and Vice President of Human Resources and Business Development since April 2009.   Prior to that time, Mr. Hall was a partner in the San Francisco, California and New York, New York offices of Reed Smith LLP, an international law firm with more than 1,500 attorneys worldwide, from 2006 until 2008. Previously, he was a senior associate and later a partner in the New York, New York office of Linklaters, a London-based global law firm, from 1998 until 2006. Mr. Hall, who is admitted to practice law in California and New York, specializes in general corporate law, finance, structured finance, and other complex commercial and financial transactions (including mergers and acquisitions). He holds a B.A. in History and French Literature from Columbia College, a Master's Degree in International Affairs from Columbia University, and a law degree from Cornell School of Law.
On May 20, 2010, we appointed Kevin A. Hall as our President and Chief Operating Officer.  Mr. Hall’s compensation and benefits were not affected by his appointment as President.

On March 24, 2011 Mr. Hall was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer.  In connection with his appointment, Mr. Hall entered into an employment agreement which provides for a two-year term of employment, which may be extended upon the parties’ mutual agreement, and an annual base salary of $225,000.  Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive an annual performance bonus in the event that we reach certain performance measures established by our Board of Directors or our Compensation Committee.  The performance milestones will be weighted 75% financial and 25% personal, and Mr. Hall’s target bonus will be equal to 50% of his base salary.

The agreement further provides that Mr. Hall is entitled to an option to purchase 13,487 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.  The option was granted pursuant to our 2003 Stock Plan and will vest according to the following schedule:  25% on March 24, 2012 (the first anniversary of the grant date) and 1/36 of the remainder each month beginning on April 24, 2012.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested shares will immediately vest and become exercisable upon a change in control.

If we terminate Mr. Hall’s employment during the first year of his term of employment without cause (as defined in the agreement) and certain other conditions are met (including that Mr. Hall provide a valid release of claims in favor of the Company), Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to his then current monthly salary for three months.  After March 24, 2012 but prior to the end of his term of employment, if we terminate Mr. Hall’s employment without cause, Mr. Hall will be entitled to a severance payment equal to his then current monthly salary for six months.  The agreement also provides that we will reimburse Mr. Hall for reasonable business expenses and allows him to participate in its regular benefit programs.

On May 20, 2011, in connection with our continued employment of Mr. Tomsic as its Chief Financial Officer, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Tomsic.  The agreement provides for a one-year term of employment, which may be extended upon the parties’ mutual agreement, and an annual base salary of $220,000.  Mr. Tomsic will be entitled to receive an annual performance bonus in the event that we reach certain performance measures established by the Chief Executive Officer or the Board of Directors (or its Compensation Committee).  Mr. Tomsic’s target bonus will be equal to $80,000.

Pursuant to the employment agreement, on May 20, 2011, Mr. Tomsic was granted an option to purchase 10,526 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.77 per share, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.  The options will vest and be exercisable according to the following schedule: 3,728 options vesting immediately and the remainder shall vest 1/31 at the end of each month thereafter over the next 31 months so long as Mr. Tomsic continues to provide services to our company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested shares shall become immediately vested and exercisable upon a change of control.

Restructuring Activities
On January 4, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a reduction in force that resulted in the termination of approximately 33% of the Company's workforce, effective January 7, 2010.  On February 23, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an additional reduction in force that resulted in the termination of approximately 20% of our workforce, effective March 4, 2010.  These reductions in force were related to our ongoing restructuring and cost reduction efforts as the Board of Directors explores a variety of strategic alternatives, including the potential sale of the Company or certain of its assets and/or the acquisition of other entities or businesses.

22


We incurred charges of $143,000 in connection with the reductions in force, consisting of one-time employee termination benefits.  All amounts were paid as of September 30, 2010.

On November 30, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a reduction in force that resulted in the termination of 36 employees of the Company, or approximately 60% of the Company’s workforce, effective December 1, 2010.   The reduction in force was related to the Company’s ongoing restructuring and cost reduction efforts and strategy of focusing its resources on the development and expansion of its core InstantProfile product, the successor to the Company’s LEC-billed directory product.  All terminated employees were involved in the marketing and sale of the Company’s InstantPromote product by its subsidiary, Local Marketing Experts, Inc. 

We incurred expenses of $99,319 in connection with the reduction in force, of which $37,500 was incurred for one-time employee termination benefits payable in cash.  The remaining expenses relate to salaries and wages payable in cash to the affected employees which were paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

In May 2011, we ceased the Direct Sales business and transferred the remaining customers to Reach Local in exchange for ten and five percent of gross revenues derived from such customers during the first and second year, respectively.  We recorded $5,773 in revenues for this agreement during the year ended September 30, 2011.  In connection with the discontinued Direct Sales business, seven employees were terminated and we recorded employee contract termination charges of $7,083.

o50,000 shares will vest in 12 equal monthly installments, beginning on the date that is 13 months after the date of grant and ending on the second anniversary of the date of grant, and be exercisable for five years after vesting at an exercise price of $7.50 per share; and

o50,000 shares will vest in 12 equal monthly installments, beginning on the date that is 25 months after the date of grant and ending on the third anniversary of the date of grant, and be exercisable for five years after vesting at an exercise price of $10.00 per share

Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make certainmany estimates and assumptions that may materially affect theboth our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, such as reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  As such, in accordance withperiod, and the usecomparability of accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesinformation presented over different reporting periods. Estimates and assumptions are based on management's experience and other information available prior to the issuance of America, our financial statements. Our actual realized results may differ materially from management’s initial estimates as reported. Summaries of our significant accounting policies are detailed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, which are an integral component of this filing.


The discussion in this section of "critical" accounting estimates and assumptions is according to the disclosure guidelines of the SEC, wherein:

·the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and

·the impact of the estimates and assumptions on our  financial condition or operating performance is material.

Besides those meeting these "critical" criteria, we make many other accounting estimates and assumptions in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. Although not associated with “highly uncertain matters,” these estimates and assumptions are also subject to revision as circumstances warrant, and materially different results may sometimes occur.

The following summarizes critical“critical” estimates and assumptions made by management in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.


statements and related disclosures.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue for our services when all of the following criteria are satisfied:

·persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

·services have been performed;

·the selling price is fixed or determinable; and

·collectability is reasonably assured.

Through September 30, 2013, we have not generated significant revenue from our two new product offerings: online presence marketing and promotional marketing.

27
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
services have been performed;
the selling price is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is reasonably assured.

Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc. (formerly Directory Services).  We

With respect to our legacy businesses, we generate revenue from customer subscriptions for directory and advertising services. We recognize revenues as services are rendered. In some instances, we receive payments in advance of rendering services, whereupon such revenues are deferred until the related services are rendered. Our billing and collection procedures include significant involvement of outside parties, referred to as aggregators for LEC billing and service providers for ACH billing. We provide allowances for customer refunds, non-paying customers and fees which are estimated at the time of billing.


Local Marketing Experts, Inc. (former Direct Sales – Customer Acquisition Services).  Our direct sales contracts typically involve upfront billing for an initial payment followed by monthly billings over the contractual period.  We recognize revenue on a straight line basis over the contractual period.  Billings in excess of recognized revenue are included as deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Previously, we recognized the value of the noncancelable portion of the Direct Sales’ customer contract as a receivable and billed the customer for the amount of the contract over the period of the contract. We only recognized a portion of the contract value as revenue each month, approximately pro-rating the contract to a monthly amount, with the remainder of the noncancelable portion of the contract maintained as a deferred revenue liability. In the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we corrected our balance sheet presentation related to our direct sales contracts to include in accounts receivable only those amounts that are still outstanding receivables after having been billed in accordance with the terms of the contract.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts


We estimate allowances for doubtful accounts for accounts that are billed directly by us as well as those serviced by third party aggregators and service providers (Processors)(processors).


23


We reflect the

Included in accounts receivable are amounts held in reserve by LEC aggregators as reserves for future refunds, billing adjustments, service fees, etc.  As we have ceased billing activities with many of these service providers, there is some uncertainty as to the Processors as accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. During the period that we received settlements from our billings through these LEC channels, the level of the reserves held by the Processors changed accordingly and the Processors often calculated the holdback amounts from the settlements due to us as ‘rolling reserves’ that we believe are actuarially estimated by them based on the level of business, the expectation of future billings from which to replenish such reserves, and other factors. The costs and expenses related to such settlements and reserve holdback amounts were recorded as expenses during the period that the settlements were received. With the cessationcollectability of such settlements, the costsreceivables and expenses are now related to the maintenance of the reserves held by the Processors. The reserves now held are not changing due to the cessation of billing activities by us, and accordingly, we have now made estimates of the costs and expenses that we are likely to incur to collect the holdback amounts held as reserves. These estimates lead to an accrual of expected costs over the expected length of the collection period of theincreased our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable and, therefore, to an increase in the allowances, instead of recording such expenses as period costs as they are actually incurred as would have been the case if we continued to have regular billings through the Processors.


The allowance at September 30, 2011 included a reserve allowance of $703,732 resulting from the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing of one of our LEC aggregators, representing a reduction in the estimated collectability of our entire pre-petition outstanding receivable balance of $777,755. accordingly. 

The aggregate of accounts receivable balances from the LEC operations that do not have billing activity was $229,270 and $956,524 as of September 30, 2011 was $1,241,0972013 and 2012, respectively, and the aggregate of corresponding allowances was $1,069,048.$140,085 and $853,452, respectively. These aggregate amounts include the accounts receivable balances and allowances for the accounts held by the Chapter 11 trustee.

bankruptcy filing of one of our LEC aggregators. At September 30, 2013 and 2012 we had $0 and $777,755 of accounts receivable and reserve allowance, respectively, associated with this LEC aggregator. This was settled on April 2, 2013 and $85,550 was received for settlement.

Carrying Value of Intangible Assets


Our intangible assets consist of licenses for the use of Internetinternet domain names or Universal Resource Locators,universal resource locators, or URLs, capitalized website development costs and software, other information technology licenses and marketing and technology relatedtechnology-related intangibles acquired through the acquisition of LiveDeal, Inc.acquisitions. All suchthese assets are capitalized at their original cost (or at fair value for assets acquired through business combinations) and amortized over their estimated useful lives. We capitalize internally generated software and website development costs in accordance with the provisions of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”.


We evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of intangible assets at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be fully recoverable. In the event of such changes, impairment would be assessed if the expected undiscounted net cash flows derived for the asset are less than its carrying amount.


Goodwill

We evaluate our goodwill for potentialDuring the second quarter of fiscal 2011, $367,588 in net intangible assets were written off which were previously used in the discontinued direct sales business. A further evaluation was conducted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 due to continued operating losses; however, it was determined that no further impairment on an annual basis or wheneverexisted at that time. In 2012, due to improved financial results, there were no changes in events or circumstances which would indicate that impairment may have occurred in accordance with the provisions of ASC 350, which requires that goodwillcarrying amounts would not be tested for impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit containing our goodwill with the related carrying amount. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, the reporting unit’s goodwill is not considered to be impaired and the second step is unnecessary.

recoverable.

Income Taxes


Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method as prescribed by ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance would be provided for those deferred tax assets for which if it is more likely than not that the related benefit will not be realized.

We have estimated net deferred income tax assets (net of valuation allowances) of $0 at September 30, 20112013 and 2010.2012. A full valuation allowance has been established against all net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 based on estimates of recoverability. While we have optimistic plans for our new business strategy, we determined that such a valuation allowance was necessary given the current and expected near term losses and the uncertainty with respect to our ability to generate sufficient profits from our new business model.lines. Therefore, we established a valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets in excess of those expected to be realizable through the application of operating loss carrybacks.


We performed an analysis of uncertain tax positions and we did not identify any significant uncertainties that would affect the carrying value of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 20112013 and 2010.2012.

28

Stock-Based Compensation

From time to time, we grant restricted stock awards and options to employees, directors, executives, and consultants.  Such awards are valued based on the grant date fair-value of the instruments, net of estimated forfeitures. The value of each award is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  The impacts of changes in such estimates on unamortized deferred compensation cost are recorded as an adjustment to compensation expense in the period in which such estimates are revised.

24

We account for stock-based compensation based on fair value. We follow the attribution method that requires companies to reduce current stock-based compensation expenses by the effect of anticipated forfeitures. We estimate forfeitures based upon our historical experience, which has resulted in a small expected forfeiture rate.
The fair value of each award is estimated on the date of the grant and amortized over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.
We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date under this model requires judgment, including estimating our value per share of common stock, volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rate. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent our best estimates based on management judgment and subjective future expectations. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model significantly changes, stock-based compensation for future awards may differ materially from the awards granted previously.

Results of Operations


Note: Due to discontinued operations, the information for the year ended September 30, 2010 was restated and revised in this report.

Net Revenues


  Net Revenues 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $4,083,412  $4,238,955  $(155,543)  (4)%

  Net Revenues 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $2,351,868  $3,070,503  $(718,635)  (23%)

Net revenues in fiscal 20112013 decreased by approximately $156,000, caused by the $1,106,000 Legacy sales decline due to the slow attrition of the Legacy customer base less the $930,000 increase in Velocity sales due to new customers added by the current sales program and $20,000 increase in Web sales.  

Cost of Services
  Cost of Services 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $3,606,143  $1,127,970  $2,478,173   220%
Cost of services increased in fiscal 2011$718,635, as compared to fiscal 2010, as2012, primarily due to the end of LEC billing, which resulted in a resultdecrease of increased costs for the new Velocity program, consisting of commissions for new customers of $1,323,000, fulfillment costs of $1,140,000, and leads of $124,000approximately $1.2 million, which was partially offset by decreasesincreases in miscellaneous costsrevenue of $52,000 and internet site costsapproximately $500,000 from the Company’s online marketing product.

Cost of $57,000.


Gross Profit

  Gross Profit 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $477,269  $3,110,985  $(2,633,716)  (85)%

Gross profit decreased approximately $2,634,000Services

  Cost of Services 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $916,331  $715,457  $200,874   28% 

Cost of servicesincreased in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 2010 reflecting a decrease2012, primarily due toincreased allowances related to the end of the LEC billing, slightly offset by the increases in netfulfillment costs for the online marketing product.

  Gross Profit 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $1,435,537  $2,355,046  $(919,509)  (39)%

Gross profit decreased in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 primarily due to the decline in revenues and an increase indescribed above, which was partially offset by the decreased cost of services as described above.

fulfillment services.

General and Administrative Expenses

  General and Administrative Expenses 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $5,721,351  $11,734,123  $(6,012,772)  (51)%

  General and Administrative Expenses 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $4,114,843  $3,290,002  $824,841   25% 

General and administrative expenses decreasedincreased in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 20102012 as outlined below:


 
·
DecreasedIncreased compensation costs of approximately $3,372,000 reflecting$968,000 due to staffing of sales representatives, fulfillment and customer support for the impacts of our restructuring actions and reduction in force during 2010 and 2011 from 111 employees at September 30, 2009 to 12 employees as of September 30, 2011;revenue products;

25


 
·
Decreased professional fees of approximately $1,009,000$32,000 related to reductions into:

§Decreased legal costsfees of $248,000$172,717, due to the resolution and wind-down of certaina reduction in litigation activities, IT consultants of $305,000, investment bankerrelated expenses,
§Reductions in marketing consultant fees of $188,000, accounting fees of $83,000, marketing consultants of $78,000 ,other$15,695, partially offset by,
§Increased other miscellaneous consultant costs of  $60,000$87,076,
§Increased accounting fees of $27,354; and outside sales service costs
§Increased IT consultant fees of $47,000;$42,064

 
·
Software costs decreaseIncreased depreciation and amortization expense of $550,000 reflecting a decrease in IT infrastructureapproximately $4,000; and product development costs;

 
·Other expense decreases of $467,000,approximately $115,000, including but not limited  to, rent and utilities, services and fees, office and supplies expenses, office closure expenses, travel and entertainment and other corporate expenses associated with our office closures, reductions in force and other cost containment initiatives;initiatives.


29
 
·
A reduction of $305,000 in damages paid in a legal settlement incurred in fiscal 2010;

·
Decreased depreciation and amortization expense of $310,000;

The following table sets forth our recent operating performance for general and administrative expenses:


  Q4 2011 Q3 2011 Q2 2011 Q1 2011 Q4 2010 Q3 2010 Q2 2010 Q1 2010 
Compensation for employees, leased employees, officers and directors $340,888 $422,901 $536,269 $936,426 $1,048,094 $967,323 $1,352,109 $2,241,197 
Professional fees  360,221  378,960  539,950  453,062  551,394  677,507  1,023,582  488,994 
Depreciation and amortization  88,868  79,227  190,254  205,477  214,617  215,102  218,200  225,653 
Other general and administrative costs  174,887  291,448  344,909  377,604  462,278  497,865  544,163  1,006,045 

expenses by quarter:

  Q4 2013  Q3 2013  Q2 2013  Q1 2013  Q4 2012  Q3 2012  Q2 2012  Q1 2012 
Compensation for employees, leased employees, officers and directors  555,323   528,767   726,137   436,062   242,490   378,700   295,333   341,325 
Professional fees  212,465   147,618   248,663   234,799   254,549   110,706   226,403   143,805 
Depreciation and amortization  70,288   65,183   65,073   63,566   67,635   55,669   67,391   69,281 
Other general and administrative costs  357,204   184,090   191,658   27,947   244,740   347,278   232,301   212,403 

Sales and Marketing Expenses

  Sales and Marketing Expenses 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $57,652  $226,442  $(168,790)  (75)%

  Sales and Marketing Expenses 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $58,788  $12,310  $46,478   378% 

Sales and marketing expenses decreasedincreased in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 20102012 primarily due to reduced spending on Robo Dialerproduction of a promotional video and clicks for new customers of $219,000 partially offset by marketing of new web services of approximately $50,000.

corporate branding.

Operating Loss

  Operating Income (Loss) 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $(5,301,734) $(8,849,580) $3,547,846   (40)%

  Operating Loss 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $(2,738,094) $(947,266) $(1,790,828)  189% 

The decreaseincrease in our operating loss for fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 2010 reflect our cost containment efforts and change in strategic direction, which caused2012 was a varietyproduct of the changes in net revenues, cost of sales,services, general and administrative expenses and sales and marketing expenses, each of which areis described above.

Total Other Income (Expense)


  Total Other Income (Expense) 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $(82,159) $41,189  $(123,348)  (299)%

  Total Other Income (Expense) 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $(3,011,628) $(640,375) $(2,371,253)  370% 

Other income (expense) in fiscal 20112013 consisted of:

$279,403 due to reversal of vendor invoices due to settlement;
$1,585 of interest income on cash balances; offset by
 ($3,292,616) of interest expense including $3,291,466 of non-cash charges associated with a beneficial conversion feature associated with our convertible debt issued to ICG.

30

Other income (expense) in fiscal 2012 consisted of:

 ·($72,000)613,000) of interest expense;expense, including $489,594 of non-cash charges associated with a beneficial conversion feature associated with our convertible debt issued to ICG;
 ·($13,000)30,000) loss on disposal of fixed assets; partially offset by
 ·$3,0002,600 of interest income on cash balances.

Other income (expense) in fiscal 2010 consisted of:
·$50,000 adjustment to the gain on sale of our customer list from fiscal 2009 reflecting adjustments to certain accruals;
·$18,000 of interest income on cash balances; partially offset by
·($27,000) loss on disposal of fixed assets.

26

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)


  Income Tax Provision (Benefit) 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $-  $(230,382) $230,382   (100)%

In the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company established a valuation allowance against all deferred tax assets given the uncertainty with respect to future operations and we continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against such assets.  Accordingly, there is no tax expense or benefit for fiscal 2011.  The income tax provision during fiscal 2010 reflects true-ups to our income tax receivable based on information received during the preparation of our 2009 tax returns.  

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

  Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $(118,355) $1,121,291  $(1,239,646)  (111)%

  Income from Discontinued Operations 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $2,708  $12,433  $(9,725)  (78)%

In March 2011, the Company decided to discontinue the Direct Salesdirect sales business and, closedaccordingly, results from that business segment in May 2011 and accordingly, are reflected as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements for all periods presented  The decline in profitability between fiscal 2011presented. Our income from direct sales for the year ended September 30, 2013 and fiscal 2010 reflects our wind-down2012 consisted of this business as well as approximately $375,000the recovery of impairment and employee termination charges associated with our discontinued line of business recorded in the second fiscal quarter of 2011.


a bad debt from a previous period.

Net Loss

  Net Loss 
  2011  2010  Change  Percent 
             
Year Ended September 30, $(5,502,248) $(7,456,718) $1,954,470   (26)%

  Net Loss 
  2013  2012  Change  Percent 
                 
Year Ended September 30, $(5,747,014) $(1,575,208) $(4,171,806)  265% 

Changes in net loss are primarily attributable to changes in operating income (loss),loss, other income (expense), income tax provision (benefit), and income (loss) from discontinued operations, each of which is described above.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


Fiscal 2013 vs. Fiscal 2012 Cash Flows

Net cash used inprovided by (used in) operating activities increaseddecreased by $381,000, or 10%,$1,833,993 to ($4,321,000)1,805,009) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011,2013, compared to ($3,940,000)$28,984 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.  This change in cash flows is attributable to the following: although our2012. Our net loss decreasedincreased by approximately $1,954,000$4.1 million in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 2010, this2012, which was partially offset by a decreasean increase in non-cash charges and other adjustments of $626,000approximately $2.9 million in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 2010.2012, primarily related to interest expense associated with the beneficial feature of our convertible notes with ICG, a related party. Cash flows from operations were also impacted by a decrease of $1,709,000approximately $500,000 in changes in working capital and other assets in fiscal 20112013 as compared to fiscal 2010, primarily attributable to the collection of income taxes receivable in 2010 resulting from net operating loss carrybacks.2012. Our primary source of cash inflows has historically been net remittances from Directory Servicesour directory services customers processed in the form of ACH billings and LEC billings. As of September 30, 2011,2013, three such entities accounted for 31%44%, 25% and 20%18% of gross accounts receivable.

We discontinued the Direct Sales Services business in May 2011 as described above.  We previously received upfront payments averaging approximately one-sixth of the gross contract amount.  Subsequent payments were received on an installment basis after the application of the initial payment amounts and were billed ratably over the remaining life of the contract.

Our most significant cash outflows include payments for general operating expenses, including payroll costs, and general and administrative expenses that typically occur within close proximity of expense recognition.

Net cash used for investing activities totaled approximately $100,000$141,000 for fiscal 20112013, consisting of $101,000 from a certificate of deposit redeemed partially offset by $1,000$91,000 for expenditures for software development, .  Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2010 was approximately $286,000, consisting primarily of expenditures for intangible assets primarily made up of software development and $50,000 for purchases of equipment in supportequipment. Net cash used for investing activities totaled approximately $531,000 for fiscal 2012, consisting of our new product offerings. 

$482,000 for expenditures for intangible assets (including website investments) and $48,000 for purchases of equipment.

During fiscal 2011,2013, our cash flows from financing activities consisted of $1,238,000 receivedproceeds from the issuance of convertible debt obtainedand warrants of $1,000,000, the$1,250,000 and issuance of stock for cash of $152,160. During fiscal 2012, our cash flows from financing activities consisted of issuance of stock to investors of $300,000,$2,350,000 and proceeds for the issuance of convertible debt of $250,000, partially offset by $62,000payments on notes payable of $1,000,000 and $37,000 of payments on capital lease obligations. Net cash used for financing activities was approximately $114,000 during fiscal 2010 and consisted of $26,000 of treasury stock repurchases and $88,000 of principal repayments on capital lease obligations.  

31

We had a working capital deficit of $1,050,000$179,968 as of September 30, 20112013 compared to a working capital of $3,201,000$370,780 as of September 30, 20102012, with current assets decreasing by $3,484,000$794,762 and current liabilities increasingdecreasing by $767,000$603,950 from September 30, 20102012 to September 30, 2011. Declines in working capital are primarily attributable to our operating net loss.


27

2013.

Future Sources of Cash; New Products and Services

While our existing cash on hand is insufficient to sustain our current operating activities, we believe that we will be able to secure additional resources to fund our operations or to repay the loan facility.operations. Other sources of financing may include:include stock issuances;issuances (for example, pursuant to our Engagement Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC, under which we may issue and sell up to a maximum aggregate amount of 660,000 shares of our common stock from time to time through Chardan as our sales agent, using our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC); additional loans; advances fromloans (for example, through our existing LEC clearing houses through their current advance programs;sale and issuance of convertible notes pursuant to the $5 million line of credit that we entered into in January 2014); or other forms of financing secured by or leveraged off our accounts receivable based on existing programs in place that are being offered to companies similar to ours. There can be nofinancing. We cannot provide any assurance that we will generate sufficient revenue or will achieve profitability, positive operating cash flows, or sufficient cash flows for operations. To the extent that we cannot repay the loan when it comes due or achieve profitability or sufficient operating cash flows, our businessadditional financing arrangements will be materially and adversely affected.available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all Further, our business is likely to experience significant volatility in its revenues, operating losses, personnel involved, products or services for sale, and other business parameters, as management implements its new product and marketing strategies and responds to operating results.

Although we pausedstopped new Velocity product sales July 15, 2011, we continuecontinued to maintain the Legacy businessservice existing customers acquired under our Directory Services and InstantProfile product and service lines and we are simultaneously exploring other strategic alternatives. We cannot provide anyIn August 2012, we commenced sourcing local deals and activities to strategic publishing partners under our LiveDeal®brand, and in November 2012, we commenced the sale of marketing tools that help local businesses manage their online presence under our Velocity Local™ brand. In September 2013, we launched LiveDeal.com, which redefinedthe Company’s strategy and direction, centering its focus on the new LiveDeal.com platform and growing the base of restaurants utilizing the LiveDeal platform to attract new customers.LiveDeal.com is a unique, real-time “deal engine” connecting merchants with consumers. There can be no assurance that additional financing arrangementsthat these new product lines will be available in amountsgenerate sufficient revenue or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

that we will achieve profitability, positive operating cash flows, or sufficient cash flows for operations.

Contractual Obligations


The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 20112013 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our future liquidity and cash flows:

  Payments Due by Fiscal Year 
  Total  2012  2013  2014  2015  Thereafter 
Operating lease commitments $514,871  $375,747  $114,965  $24,159  $-  $- 
Capital lease commitments  37,417   37,417   -   -   -   - 
  $552,288  $413,164  $114,965  $24,159  $-  $- 

  Payments Due by Fiscal Year 
  Total  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  Thereafter 
  $470,680  $211,767  $201,630  $57,283  $  $  $ 
Operating lease commitments  57,000   19,000   19,000   19,000            
Noncancellable service contracts $527,680  $230,767  $220,630  $76,283  $  $  $ 

At September 30, 2011,2013, we had no other off-balance sheet arrangements, commitments or guarantees that require additional disclosure or measurement.


ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk


As of September 30, 2011,2013, we did not participate in any market risk-sensitive commodity instruments for which fair value disclosure would be required. We believe that we are not subject in any material way to other forms of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange risk or foreign customer purchases (of which there were none in fiscal 20112013 or 2010)2012) or commodity price risk.

32

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data


LIVEDEAL, INC.


INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  Page 
    
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 2934 
    
Consolidated Financial Statements:   
    
AuditedConsolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 3035 
    
Audited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 3136 
    
Audited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 3237 
    
Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 3338 
    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 3439 

33
28


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of


and Stockholders

LiveDeal, Inc. and Subsidiaries


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LiveDeal, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended September 30, 2011.2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended September 30, 2011,2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had a net loss of $5,747,014 for the year ended September 30, 2013 and had an accumulated deficit of $27,333,647 as of September 30, 2013. These factors, as discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to the matter are also described in Note 3. The statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.Kabani and Company, Inc.

Kabani and Company, Inc.

Certified Public Accountants

Los Angeles, California

January 10, 2014

34

Phoenix, Arizona
December 29, 2011

29


LIVEDEAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
       
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $244,470  $3,227,374 
Certificates of deposit  -   101,293 
Accounts receivable, net  654,856   948,439 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  113,323   219,121 
Total current assets  1,012,649   4,496,227 
Accounts receivable, long term portion, net  371,438   330,234 
Property and equipment, net  171,201   397,382 
Deposits and other assets  31,007   49,294 
Intangible assets, net  1,222,334   1,938,952 
Total assets $2,808,629  $7,212,089 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Liabilities:        
Accounts payable $600,908  $354,440 
Accrued liabilities  424,595   880,188 
Notes payable  1,000,000   - 
Current portion of capital lease obligation  36,992   60,327 
Total current liabilities  2,062,495   1,294,955 
Long term portion of capital lease obligation  -   38,283 
Total liabilities  2,062,495   1,333,238 
         
Commitments and contingencies        
         
Stockholders' equity:        
Series E convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized,        
127,840 issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $38,202  10,866   10,866 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 698,491 and 639,117        
shares issued, 694,239 and 634,865 shares outstanding at September 30, 2011        
and September 30, 2010, respectively  698   639 
Treasury stock (4,252 shares carried at cost)  (70,923)  (70,923)
Paid in capital  20,813,082   20,441,692 
Accumulated deficit  (20,007,589)  (14,503,423)
Total stockholders' equity  746,134   5,878,851 
         
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $2,808,629  $7,212,089 

See

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents $761,458  $1,305,785 
Accounts receivable, net  174,901   439,848 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  67,126   52,614 
Total current assets  1,003,485   1,798,247 
Accounts receivable, long term portion, net  44,639   374,570 
Property and equipment, net  71,162   50,526 
Deposits and other assets  25,563   35,707 
Intangible assets, net  2,848,401   1,997,671 
Total assets $3,993,250  $4,256,721 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Liabilities:        
Accounts payable $524,053  $1,017,363 
Accrued liabilities  299,464   410,104 
Total liabilities  823,517   1,427,467 
         
Stockholders' equity:        
Series E convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 127,840 issued and outstanding, liquidation preference $38,202  10,866   10,866 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 3,778,558 and 2,620,486 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively  3,779   2,620 
Paid in capital  30,488,735   24,400,483 
Accumulated deficit  (27,333,647)  (21,584,715)
Total stockholders' equity  3,169,733   2,829,254 
         
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $3,993,250  $4,256,721 

The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

35

30


LIVEDEAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


  Year Ended September 30, 
  2011  2010 
       
Net revenues $4,083,412  $4,238,955 
Cost of services  3,606,143   1,127,970 
Gross profit  477,269   3,110,985 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  5,721,351   11,734,123 
Sales and marketing expenses  57,652   226,442 
Total operating expenses  5,779,003   11,960,565 
Operating loss  (5,301,734)  (8,849,580)
Other income (expense):        
Interest income (expense), net  (69,223)  18,186 
Other income (expense)  (12,936)  23,003 
Total other income (expense)  (82,159)  41,189 
         
Loss before income taxes  (5,383,893)  (8,808,391)
Income tax provision (benefit)  -   (230,382)
Loss from continuing operations  (5,383,893)  (8,578,009)
         
Discontinued operations        
Income (loss) from discontinued component, including disposal costs  (118,355)  1,121,291 
Income tax provision (benefit)  -   - 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (118,355)  1,121,291 
         
Net loss $(5,502,248) $(7,456,718)
         
Earnings per share - basic and diluted1:
        
Loss from continuing operations $(8.11) $(13.59)
Discontinued operations  (0.18)  1.78 
Net loss $(8.29) $(11.81)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
Basic  664,167   631,503 
Diluted  664,167   631,503 

1 Certain amounts may not total due to rounding of individual components.
See

  Year Ended September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Net revenues $2,351,868  $3,070,503 
Cost of services  916,331   715,457 
Gross profit  1,435,537   2,355,046 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  4,114,843   3,290,002 
Sales and marketing expenses  58,788   12,310 
Total operating expenses  4,173,631   3,302,312 
Operating loss  (2,738,094)  (947,266)
Other expense:        
Interest expense, net  (3,291,031)  (610,485)
Other income  279,403   (29,890)
Total other expense, net  (3,011,628)  (640,375)
         
Loss from continuing operations  (5,749,722)  (1,587,641)
         
Discontinued operations        
Income from discontinued component, including disposal costs  2,708   12,433 
Income from discontinued operations  2,708   12,433 
         
Net loss $(5,747,014) $(1,575,208)
         
Earnings per share - basic and diluted:        
Loss from continuing operations $(1.84) $(0.77)
Discontinued operations  0.00   0.01 
Net loss $(1.84) $(0.76)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
Basic and diluted  3,131,420   2,068,828 

The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


statements.

36
31


LIVEDEAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY


   Common Stock Preferred Stock Treasury Paid-In Retained   
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Stock Capital Earnings Total 
                  
Balance, September 30, 2009  643,012 $643  127,840 $10,866 $(45,041)$20,285,867 $(7,044,787)$13,207,548 
                          
Series E preferred stock dividends                    (1,918) (1,918)
Stock based compensation - stock options                 38,448     38,448 
Restricted stock cancellations  (3,895) (4)          4     - 
Amortization of deferred stock compensation                 117,373     117,373 
Treasury stock purchases              (25,882)       (25,882)
Net loss                    (7,456,718) (7,456,718)
Balance, September 30, 2010  639,117 $639  127,840 $10,866 $(70,923)$20,441,692 $(14,503,423)$5,878,851 
                          
Series E preferred stock dividends                    (1,918) (1,918)
Stock based compensation - stock options                 38,231     38,231 
Issuance of common stock for cash  50,198  50           299,950     300,000 
Restricted stock cancellations  (8) -           -     - 
Amortization of deferred stock compensation                 17,885     17,885 
Issuance of common stock for services  9,184  9           15,324     15,333 
Net loss                    (5,502,248) (5,502,248)
Balance, September 30, 2011  698,491 $698  127,840 $10,866 $(70,923)$20,813,082 $(20,007,589)$746,134 

See

  Common Stock  Preferred Stock             
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Treasury Stock  Paid-In Capital  Accumulated Deficit  Total 
Balance, September 30, 2011  698,491  $698   127,840  $10,866  $(70,923) $20,813,082  $(20,007,589) $746,134 
Series E preferred stock dividends                          (1,918)  (1,918)
Stock based compensation                      16,942       16,942 
Issuance of common stock for cash  1,694,529   1,694               2,348,306       2,350,000 
Restricted stock cancellations  (25)                           
Issuance of common stock for services  47,827   48               124,718       124,766 
Issuance of common stock for intangibles  75,000   75               419,925       420,000 
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt and warrants                      489,594       489,594 
Conversion of note payable  109,139   109               258,835       258,944 
Treasury stock retired  (4,475)  (4)          70,923   (70,919)       
Net loss                          (1,575,208)  (1,575,208)
Balance, September 30, 2012  2,620,486   2,620   127,840   10,866      24,400,483   (21,584,715)  2,829,254 
Series E preferred stock dividends                          (1,918)  (1,918)
Stock based compensation                      173,073       173,073 
Issuance of common stock for services  67,476   68               227,644       227,712 
Issuance of common stock for cash  44,233   44               152,116       152,160 
Issuance of common stock for intangibles  200,000   200               993,800       994,000 
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt and warrants                      3,291,466       3,291,466 
Conversion of note payable  846,363   847               1,250,153       1,251,000 
Net loss                          (5,747,014)  (5,747,014)
Balance, September 30, 2013  3,778,558   3,779   127,840   10,866      30,488,735   (27,333,647)  3,169,733 

The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


statements.

37
32


LIVEDEAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

AUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


  Year Ended September 30, 
  2011  2010 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:      
Net loss $(5,502,248) $(7,456,718)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash        
used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  563,826   873,572 
Non-cash stock compensation expense  38,231   38,448 
Non-cash issuance of common stock for services  15,333   - 
Amortization of deferred stock compensation  17,885   117,373 
Provision for uncollectible accounts  336,929   921,804 
Non-cash impairment of goodwill and intangibles  367,588   - 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  12,936   27,647 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (84,550)  317,109 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  105,798   107,321 
Deposits and other assets  18,287   31,918 
Accounts payable  246,468   (195,241)
Accrued liabilities  (457,511)  (214,541)
Income taxes receivable  -   1,490,835 
         
Net cash used in operating activities  (4,321,028)  (3,940,473)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  -   5,000 
Expenditures for intangible assets  -   (235,012)
Redemption of (investment in) certificate of deposits  101,293   (1,293)
Purchases of property and equipment  (1,551)  (54,921)
         
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  99,742   (286,226)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Principal repayments on capital lease obligations  (61,618)  (88,075)
Issuance of common stock for cash  300,000   - 
Proceeds from notes payable  1,000,000   - 
Purchase of treasury stock  -   (25,882)
         
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  1,238,382   (113,957)
         
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (2,982,904)  (4,340,656)
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period  3,227,374   7,568,030 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $244,470  $3,227,374 
         
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:        
Noncash financing and investing activities:        
Accrued and unpaid dividends $1,918  $1,918 
         
Cash paid for interest $57,266  $5,842 
         
Cash paid for income taxes $1,600  $1,600 

See

  Year Ended September 30, 
  2013  2012 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(5,747,014) $(1,575,208)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  264,112   259,975 
Non-cash interest expense associated with convertible debt and warrants  3,291,466   489,594 
Stock based compensation expense  173,073   16,942 
Non-cash issuance of common stock for services  227,712   124,766 
Provision for uncollectible accounts  (293,876)  (81,026)
Loss on disposal of property and equipment     36,040 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  888,754   292,902 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (14,512)  60,709 
Deposits and other assets  10,144   (4,700)
Accounts payable  (493,310)  416,455 
Accrued liabilities  (111,558)  (7,465)
         
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (1,805,009)  28,984 
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Expenditures for intangible assets  (91,483)  (482,413)
Purchases of property and equipment  (49,995)  (48,264)
         
Net cash used in investing activities  (141,478)  (530,677)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Payments on notes payable     (1,000,000)
Principal repayments on capital lease obligations      (36,992)
Issuance of common stock for cash  152,160   2,350,000 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt and warrants  1,250,000   250,000 
         
Net cash provided by financing activities  1,402,160   1,563,008 
         
         
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (544,327)  1,061,315 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period  1,305,785   244,470 
         
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $761,458  $1,305,785 
         
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:        
Noncash financing and investing activities:        
Issuance of common stock in connection with the acquisition of LiveOpenly $   420,000 
Issuance of common stock for intangibles $994,000  $ 
Conversion of notes payable and accrued interest into common stock $1,251,000  $258,944 
Accrued and unpaid dividends $1,918  $1,918 
Interest paid $150  $97,895 

 The accompanying notes toare an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


statements.

33


38
1.ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

LiveDeal, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1:Organization and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LiveDeal, Inc. (formerly YP Corp.), a Nevada corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”). The Company delivers local customer acquisition services for small and medium-sized businesses combined with online listing services to deliver an affordable way for businesses to extend their marketing reach to local, relevant customers via the Internet.


The Company’s new strategic focus is on deliveringdeveloping and marketing a suite of Internet-based, local search driven, customer acquisitionaffordable products and services fordesigned to meet the online marketing needs of small and medium-sized businesses soldby boosting customer awareness and merchant visibility on the internet. The Company primarily sells this suite of products and services via telemarketing and supported by its websites and internally developed software.


telemarketing.

The following sets forth historical transactions with respect to the Company’s organizational development:


 ·Telco Billing, Inc. was formed in April 1998 to provide advertising and directory listings for businesses on its Internet website in a “Yellow Pages” format. Telco provides those services to its subscribers for a monthly fee. These services are provided primarily to businesses throughout the United States. Telco became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company after the June 1999 acquisition.

 ·At the time that the transaction was agreed to, the Company had 12,567,770 common shares issued and outstanding. As a result of the merger transaction with Telco, there were 29,567,770 common shares outstanding, and the former Telco stockholders held approximately 57% of the Company’s voting stock. For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by Telco, under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with Telco as the acquirer. Consistent with reverse acquisition accounting, (i) all of Telco’s assets, liabilities, and accumulated deficit were reflected at their combined historical cost (as the accounting acquirer) and (ii) the preexisting outstanding shares of the Company (the accounting acquiree) were reflected at their net asset value as if issued on June 16, 1999.

 ·On June 6, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of LiveDeal, Inc. (“LiveDeal”), a California corporation. LiveDeal operated an online local classifieds marketplace, www.livedeal.com, which listed millions of goods and services for sale across the United States. The technology acquired in the acquisition offered such classifieds functionality as fraud protection, identity protection, e-commerce, listing enhancements, photos, community-building, package pricing, premium stores, featured Yellow Page business listings and advanced local search capabilities. This business has since been discontinued – seediscontinued. See Note 3.4.

 ·On July 10, 2007, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of OnCall Subscriber Management Inc., a Manila, Philippines-based company that provided telemarketing services. The acquisition took place through the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, 247 Marketing LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which remains in existence but is inactive.

 ·On August 10, 2007, the Company filed amended and restated articles of incorporation with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, pursuant to which the Company’s name was changed to LiveDeal, Inc., effective August 15, 2007. The name change was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors pursuant to discretion granted to it by the Company’s stockholders at a special meeting on August 2, 2007.

·During 2009, the Company made strategic changes that impacted the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the following manner:

oImpairment charges of $16,111,494 were recorded related to the write-down of the Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets;
oThe Company commenced a plan to discontinue its classifieds business and initiated shutdown activities and has reflected the operating results of this line of business as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations;
oThe Company sold a portion of its customer list associated with its directory services business and recorded a gain of $3,040,952; and
oThe Company established a valuation allowance of $10,586,854 related to its deferred tax assets, as described in Note 12.

 ·During 2010, wethe Company evaluated ourits business and adopted a new business strategy that addressed each of ourthe Company’s business segments as separate entities and re-launched and restructured ourthe Company’s legacy line of business. This evaluation was necessitated by the challenges facing ourthe Company’s Direct Sales business lines that provide Internet-based customer acquisition strategies for small business, as well as declining revenues from ourthe Company’s traditional business line (i.e. directory services).

As a result, we made significant changes to our business strategy during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.  We decided to move our strategic focus towards our directory services business and bring it up to current market standards and regulatory requirements and away from our Direct Sales business line.   This strategy culminated in the termination of all new sales under the Direct Sales business line on December 1, 2010.

34


 ·During 2011, as part of ourthe Company’s strategy to evaluate each of ourthe Company’s business segments as separate entities, management noted that the Direct Sales business segment had incurred operating losses and declining revenues and did not fit with ourthe Company’s change in strategic direction. Accordingly, in March 2011, wethe Company made the strategic decision to discontinue our Direct Sales business and product offerings. Prior year financial statements have been restated to present the Direct Sales business segment as a discontinued operation.

We initiated shutdown activities in March 2011 and completed such activities in May 2011.  In conjunction with the discontinued operations, we recorded the following charges in fiscal 2011:

oEmployee contract termination charges of $7,083 reflecting the reduction in force of 7 employees;39
 

oNon cash impairment charges $367,588 consisting·On August 16, 2012, the Company acquired substantially all of the write-offassets of LiveOpenly, Inc., a California corporation (“LiveOpenly”), which sourced, published and sold discounted offers for goods and services through local retail merchants, in exchange for the issuance of 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $420,000 of net assets, consisting entirely of intangible assets;assets. No goodwill was recognized as the purchase price equaled the net assets received.

·During 2012, the Company also launched two new business lines under new management after a period of re-evaluating our sales program, products, distribution methods and vendor programs. First, we commenced the sale of marketing tools that help local businesses manage their online presence under our Velocity Localbrand, which we refer to as online presence marketing, in November 2012. Second, we commenced sourcing local deal and activities to strategic publishing partners under our LiveDeal® brand, which we refer to as promotional marketing, in August 2012. We continue to actively develop, revise and evaluate these products and services.

·During 2013, the Company launched LiveDeal.com, which redefined the Company’s strategy and direction, centering its focus on the new LiveDeal.com platform and growing the base of restaurants utilizing the LiveDeal platform to attract new customers.  LiveDeal.com is a unique, real-time “deal engine” connecting merchants with consumers. The Company believes that it has developed the first-of-its-kind web/mobile platform providing restaurants with full control and flexibility to instantly publish customized offers whenever they wish to attract customers.

The Company had a net loss of $5.5$5.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2011,2013 and $7.5$1.6 million for the year ended September 30, 2010.2012. The Company had a negativean operating cash flowoutflow of $4.3approximately $(1.8) million for the year ended September 30, 2011,2013 and $3.9 millionoperating cash inflow of approximately $29,000 for the year ended September 30, 2010.2012. The Company borrowed $1.0 million in May 2011 which is due May 2012 and the Company had cash of $244,470$761,458 as of September 30, 2011.  Subsequent to September 30, 2011, the Company was able to obtain $2.0 million in equity financing – see Note 17.  The Company has significantly reduced operating expenses by reviewing all expenses and improving operating efficiencies.2013. Management believes the Company’s cash on hand and additional cash generated from operations together with potential sources of cash such as obtaining advances fromthrough the Company’s LEC clearing housesissuance of debt or leveraging off of its accounts receivableequity will provide the Company with sufficient liquidity for the next 12 months.


2.Note 2:SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESSummary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements represent the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company and include the accounts and results of operations of the Company, LiveDeal, Local Marketing Experts, Inc., Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc., 247 Marketing Inc., Telco Billing, Inc. and Telco of Canada, Inc., theand Velocity Local Inc. ,the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, for the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, as applicable. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.


Use of Estimates:

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Significant estimates made in connection with the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the estimate of dilution and fees associated with LEC billings, the estimated reserve for doubtful accounts receivable, estimated forfeiture rates for stock-based compensation, fair values in connection with the analysis of goodwill and long-lived assets for impairment, valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets and estimated useful lives for intangible assets and property and equipment.


Financial Instruments:

Financial instruments consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, advances to affiliates and obligations under accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable. The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.


Cash and Cash Equivalents:  

This includes all short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less. At times, cash deposits may exceed government-insuredFDIC-insured limits.

40

Property and Equipment:  

Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to five years. Depreciation expense was $214,796$29,357 and $240,798$132,899 for the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, respectively.


Revenue Recognition:


Directory Services


Revenue is billed and recognized monthly for services subscribed in that specific month. The Company has historically utilized outside billing companies to perform billing services through two primary channels:


•      direct ACH withdrawals; and
•      inclusion on the customer’s local telephone bill provided by their Local Exchange Carriers, or LECs.

35


·direct ACH withdrawals; and
·inclusion on the customer’s local telephone bill provided by their Local Exchange Carriers, or LECs.

For billings via ACH withdrawals, revenue is recognized when such billings are accepted. For billings via LECs, the Company recognizes revenue based on net billings accepted by the LECs. Due to the periods of time for which adjustments may be reported by the LECs and the billing companies, the Company estimates and accrues for dilution and fees reported subsequent to year-end for initial billings related to services provided for periods within the fiscal year. Such dilution and fees are reported in cost of services in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Customer refunds are recorded as an offset to gross revenue.


The Company continues to service some wholesale accounts through LEC billing channels and is rebuilding its customer base billed through LECs through its Velocity Marketing Concepts, Inc. subsidiary.

Revenue for billings to certain customers that are billed directly by the Company and not through the outside billing companies is recognized based on estimated future collections. The Company continuously reviews this estimate for reasonableness based on its collection experience.


Direct Sales

The Company’s direct sales contracts typically involve upfront billing for an initial payment followed by monthly billings over the contractual period.  

Deals Revenue

The Company recognizes revenue from its sales through its strategic publishing partners of discounted goods and services offered by its merchant clients (“Deals”) when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred; the selling price is fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. These criteria are met when the number of customers who purchase the daily deal exceeds the predetermined threshold, where, if applicable, the Deal has been electronically delivered to the purchaser and a listing of Deals sold has been made available to the merchant. At that time, the Company's obligations to the merchant, for which it is serving as an agent, are substantially complete. The Company's remaining obligations, which are limited to remitting payment to the merchant, are inconsequential or perfunctory. The Company records as revenue an amount equal to the net amount it retains from the sale of Deals after paying an agreed upon percentage of the purchase price to the featured merchant excluding any applicable taxes. Revenue is recorded on a straight linenet basis overbecause the contractual period.  Billings in excessCompany is acting as an agent of recognized revenue are included as deferred revenuethe merchant in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


transaction.

Deferred Revenues


Revenue

In some instances, the Company receives payments in advance of rendering services, whereupon such revenues are deferred until the related services are rendered. Deferred revenue was $14,553$2,829 and $87,574$2,310 at September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, respectively.


Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:  

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, which includes allowances for customer refunds, dilution and fees from LEC billing aggregators and other uncollectible accounts. The Company has decreasedincreased its allowances for doubtful accounts to 61.3%82.8% of gross accounts receivable at September 30, 20112013 as compared to 63.5%65.7% of gross accounts receivable at September 30, 2010.2012. The determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts is dependent on many factors, including regulatory activity, changes in fee schedules by LEC service providers and recent historical trends.

As of September 30, 2013, approximately 57% of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is an allowance against an outstanding receivable balance that is in dispute. After excluding these reserves from the related accounts receivable balances the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable increases to 68%. As of September 30, 2012, approximately 93% of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is an allowance against accounts receivable balances and reserves held by a LEC that is in bankruptcy and an allowance against an outstanding receivable balance that is in dispute. After excluding these reserves from the related accounts receivable balances, the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable decreases to 12.6%. See Note 17.

41

Legal Costs:  

The Company expenses legal costs associated with loss contingencies as they are incurred.


Income Taxes:

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance would be provided for those deferred tax assets for which if it is more likely than not that the related benefit will not be realized. The Company classifies tax-related penalties and interest as a component of income tax expense for financial statement presentation.


Stock-Based Compensation:  

The Company from time to time grants restricted stock awards and options to employees and executives. Such awards are valued based on the grant date fair-value of the instruments, net of estimated forfeitures. The value of each award is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.


The Company accounts for stock awards issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” and FASB ASC 505, “Equity”, and accordingly, stock awards to non-employees are accounted for at fair value at their respective measurement date.

Net Income (Loss)Loss Per Share:

Net income (loss)loss per share is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. Under ASC 260 basic net income (loss)loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period except that it does not include unvested restricted stock subject to cancellation. Diluted net income (loss)loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, restricted shares and convertible preferred stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding restricted shares and warrants is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. Convertible preferred stock is reflected on an if-converted basis.


Internally Developed Software and Website Development Costs:  

The Company incurs internal and external costs to develop software and websites to support its core business functions. The Company capitalizes internally generated software and website development costs in accordance with the provisions of the FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”.


36


Impairment of Long-lived Assets:

The Company assesses long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”. A long-lived asset (asset group)(or group of assets) shall be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a long lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted net cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the net book value of the asset and its estimated fair value. For purposes of these tests, long-lived assets must be grouped with other assets and liabilities for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.  During the 2011 second fiscal quarter, $367,588 in net intangible assets were written off which were previously used in the discontinued Direct Sales business.  An independent third party valuation company performed an analysis of Intangible Assets for impairment testing under Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 360 (formerly SFAS 144 – Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets).  The report concluded that the Intangible Assets were not impaired and a write down of the Intangible Assets was not required.

42

Effects of Stock Splits: Effective on September 7, 2010, the Company implemented a 1-for-10 reverse stock split with respect to issued and outstanding shares of its common stock.  Additionally, the Company’s authorized shares of common stock were reduced to 10,000,000 shares.   

Effective August 10, 2011, the Company implemented a 20-for-19 stock split with respect to issued and outstanding shares of its common stock. The stock split was in the form of a stock dividend, with one (1) share of the Company’s common stock issued in respect of every 19 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of July 29, 2011, the record date for the stock split. Any fractional shares otherwise issuable as a result of the stock split were rounded up to the nearest whole share.

All share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated for the effects of the stock splits described above.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In October 2009,January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 605)210): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensusClarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2009-13”), which provides guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated,determined that it could make them more operable and the consideration allocated. ASU 2009-13 requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. ASU 2009-13 iscost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the first annual reporting periodmost significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after June 15, 2010 and may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. ASU 2009-13 is effective for the Company on OctoberJanuary 1, 2010.2013. The adoption of this amendment didASU 2013-01 has not had a material impact the Company’son our financial position or results of operations.


In December 2010,October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, WhenNo. 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements, (“ASU 2012-04”).” This update includes source literature amendments, guidance clarification, reference corrections and relocated guidance affecting a variety of topics in the Codification. The update also includes conforming amendments to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (Topic 350)—Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (ASU2010-28). ASU 2010-28 amends the criteria for performing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing Step 2 if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The Company will adopt ASU 2010-28 in fiscal 2012 and management does not believe it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): AmendmentsCodification to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2011-04”) in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Under ASU 2011-04, the guidance amends certain accounting and disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements to ensure that fair value has the same meaning in GAAP and in IFRS and that their respectivereflect ASC 820’s fair value measurement and disclosure requirementsrequirements. The amendments in this update that will not have transition guidance are effective upon issuance. The amendments in this update that are subject to the same. ASU 2011-04 istransition guidance will be effective for public entities during interim and annualfiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption by public entities2012. This ASU is not permitted. The Company does not believe that theeffective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Our adoption of this guidance willASU 2011-11 on January 1, 2013, did not have a material impact our financial statement.

Note 3:Going Concern

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentationrealization of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”). ASU 2011-05 requires companies to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net incomeassets and the componentssatisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company had a net loss of $5,747,014 for the year ended September 30, 2013 and had an accumulated deficit of $27,333,647 as of September 30, 2013

Because of the infancy of the Company’s new lines of business, the Company has yet to generate significant revenue from its online presence marketing or promotional marketing lines of business. Given that the Company has not been accepting new customers for its legacy product offerings since July 2011 and that it did not launch its new product offerings until August 2012, the Company’s revenues declined for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 as the Company continued to build a foundation for its new products and services and position the Company for future growth through its LiveDeal.com and Velocity Local offerings.

The Company will require additional capital to finance its planned business operations as it continues to build and market its LiveDeal.com and Velocity Localofferings and develop other comprehensive income eithernew products. In addition, the Company may require additional capital to finance acquisitions or other strategic investments in its business. Other sources of financing may include stock issuances (for example, pursuant to our Engagement Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC, under which we may issue and sell up to a maximum aggregate amount of 660,000 shares of our common stock from time to time through Chardan as our sales agent, using our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC); additional loans (for example, through our sale and issuance of convertible notes pursuant to the $5 million line of credit that we entered into in January 2014); or other forms of financing. Any financing obtained may further dilute or otherwise impair the ownership interest of the Company’s existing stockholders. If the Company is unable to generate positive cash flows or raise additional capital in a single continuous statementtimely manner or on acceptable terms, the Company may (i) not be able to make acquisitions or other strategic investments in its business, (ii) modify, delay or abandon some or all of comprehensive income its business plans, and/or in two separate but consecutive statements. (iii) be forced to cease operations.

The provisionsaccompanying Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of ASU 2011-05 are effective for fiscal years,asset carrying amounts or the amount and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Since ASU 2011-05 only amendsclassification of liabilities that might result should the disclosure requirements concerning comprehensive income, the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 allows a companyCompany be unable to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amountcontinue as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more likely than not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. The provisions of ASU 2011-08 are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-08 is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

37


going concern.

3.Note 4:DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSDiscontinued Operations

As part of the Company’s strategy to evaluate each of its business segments as separate entities, management noted that the Direct Sales business segment had incurred operating losses and declining revenues and did not fit with the Company’s change in strategic direction. Accordingly, in March 2011, the Company made the strategic decision to discontinue its Direct Sales business and product offerings. Prior year financial statements have been restated to present the Direct Sales business segment as a discontinued operation.

43

The Company initiated shutdown activities in March 2011 and closed the Direct Sales business segment in May 2011. In conjunction with the discontinued operations, the Company recorded the following charges in the year ended September 30, 2011:


· Employee contract termination charges of $7,083 reflecting the reduction in force of 7 employees;

· Non cash impairment charges of $367,588 consisting of the write-off of net intangible assets;

·Employee contract termination charges of $7,083 reflecting the reduction in force of 7 employees; and
·Non cash impairment charges of $367,588 consisting of the write-off of net intangible assets.

The Direct Salesdirect sales business segment accounted for $1,341,430 and $3,838,479 of$0 net revenues for the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 2010, respectively, which2012. Net revenues from this business segment are now included as part of income (loss) from discontinued component, including disposal costs,operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Net income for the year ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 consisted of a recovery on a bad debt from a previous period.

4.Note 5:BALANCE SHEET INFORMATIONBusiness Combination

On August 16, 2012 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all of the assets of LiveOpenly, Inc., a California corporation (“LiveOpenly”), which sourced, published and sold discounted offers for goods and services through local retail merchants. The Company acquired the assets of LiveOpenly to assist in the implementation its new business line. Under the terms of the acquisition, the Company acquired LiveOpenly’s sourcing contracts, software, customer lists, trademarks, domain names, and related assets in exchange for the issuance of 75,000 shares of our common stock. The purchase price for the assets of LiveOpenly was determined by using the value of the stock on the Acquisition Date, which was $420,000. The purchase price was allocated to a customer list and marketing related intangibles of $252,000 and $168,000, respectively. The intangibles will be amortized over their estimated useful life of seven years. No goodwill was recognized as the purchase price equaled the fair value of the net assets received.

In connection with the purchased business from LiveOpenly, the Company engaged Ejimofor Umenyiora, the former Director of Sales of LiveOpenly, and Akeem Adeteju, the former Chief Technology Officer of LiveOpenly, as independent contractors.

Note 6:Balance Sheet Information

Balance sheet information is as follows:

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Receivables, current, net:        
Accounts receivable, current $904,197  $1,863,067 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (729,296)  (1,423,219)
  $174,901  $439,848 
Receivables, long term, net:        
Accounts receivable, long term $374,708  $510,587 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (330,069)  (136,017)
  $44,639  $374,570 
Total receivables, net:        
Gross receivables $1,278,905  $2,373,654 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (1,059,365)  (1,559,236)
  $219,540  $814,418 

Long term receivables consist of reserves held by LEC processors that are not expected to be settled within 12 months.

As of September 30, 2013, approximately 57% of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was an allowance against an outstanding receivable balance that is in dispute. After excluding these reserves from the related accounts receivable balances the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable increases to 68%. As of September 30, 2012, approximately 93% of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was an allowance against accounts receivable balances and reserves held by a LEC that is in bankruptcy and an allowance against an outstanding receivable balance that is in dispute. After excluding these reserves from the related accounts receivable balances, the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable decreases to 12.6%. See Note 17.

44
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
Receivables, current, net:      
Accounts receivable, current $2,080,747  $2,750,393 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (1,425,891)  (1,801,954)
  $654,856  $948,439 
Receivables, long term, net:        
Accounts receivable, long term $569,178  $680,108 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (197,740)  (349,874)
  $371,438  $330,234 
Total receivables, net:        
Gross receivables $2,649,925  $3,430,501 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  (1,623,631)  (2,151,828)
  $1,026,294  $1,278,673 

38


Components of allowance for doubtful accounts are as follows:


  September 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
Allowance for dilution and fees on amounts due from billing aggregators $1,477,769  $2,104,826 
Allowance for customer refunds  145,862   47,002 
  $1,623,631  $2,151,828 
         
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
Property and equipment, net:        
Leasehold improvements $201,476  $239,271 
Furnishings and fixtures  233,577   319,004 
Office, computer equipment and other  426,931   704,388 
   861,984   1,262,663 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (690,783)  (865,281)
  $171,201  $397,382 
         
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
Intangible assets, net:        
Domain name and marketing related intangibles $1,509,600  $1,509,600 
Website and technology related intangibles  351,941   1,914,991 
   1,861,541   3,424,591 
Less:  Accumulated amortization  (639,207)  (1,485,639)
  $1,222,334  $1,938,952 
         
  September 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
Accrued liabilities:        
Deferred revenue $14,553  $87,574 
Accrued payroll and bonuses  63,043   124,544 
Accruals under revenue sharing agreements  86,550   133,119 
Accrued expenses - other  260,448   534,951 
  $424,594  $880,188 

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Allowance for dilution and fees on amounts due from billing aggregators $730,777  $1,525,126 
Allowance for customer refunds  6,281   34,111 
  $737,058  $1,559,237 

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Property and equipment, net:        
Furnishings and fixtures $101,611  $94,511 
Office, computer equipment and other  404,580   361,685 
   506,191   456,196 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (435,029)  (405,670)
  $71,162  $50,526 

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Intangible assets, net:        
Domain name and marketing related intangibles $1,513,708  $1,511,650 
Website and technology related intangibles  2,335,728   1,252,304 
   3,849,436   2,763,954 
Less: Accumulated amortization  (1,001,035)  (766,283)
  $2,848,401  $1,997,671 

  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Accrued liabilities:        
Deferred revenue $2,829  $2,310 
Accrued payroll and bonuses  27,330   28,968 
Accruals under revenue sharing agreements  44,167   67,601 
Accrued expenses - other  225,138   311,225 
  $299,464  $410,104 

5.Note 7:INTANGIBLE ASSETSIntangible Assets

The Company’s intangible assets consist of licenses for the use of Internet domain names, Universal Resource Locators, or URLs, capitalized website development costs, other information technology licenses and marketing and technology related intangibles acquired through the acquisition of LiveDeal, Inc. All such assets are capitalized at their original cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to 20 years.

The

Based in part on a third party appraisal of the Company’s long-lived assets, the Company performed its annual impairment analysis and determined that no impairment of its long-lived intangible assets existed at September 30, 20112013 and 2010.  In connection with the discontinued operations related to the Direct Sales business, net intangible assets of $367,588 were written off in the second fiscal quarter of 2011.2012.

45

The following summarizes estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets that have net balances as of September 30, 2011:


Years ended September 30,   
2012 $108,828 
2013  79,662 
2014  77,422 
2015  77,422 
2016  77,422 
Thereafter  801,578 
Total $1,222,334 

39


2013:

2014  416,211 
2015  406,550 
2016  362,316 
2017  358,352 
2018  324,389 
Thereafter  991,583 
  $2,859,401 

Total amortization expense related to intangible assets was $349,030$234,751 and non-cash impairment charges of $367,588 was associated with the write off of net intangible assets from discontinued operations for the year ended September 30, 2011.  Total amortization expense related to intangible assets was $632,744 for the year ended September 30, 2010.


6.CAPITAL LEASES

At September 30, 2011, the Company was a party to one capital lease for communications equipment acquired during the year ended September 30, 2008 with a cost basis of $255,603.  This lease has a term of 48 months and an imputed interest rate of 3.6%. This capital lease is secured by the underlying equipment.  Equipment acquired under this capital lease is being depreciated over their estimated lives of four years.

Future minimum lease payments due under the capital lease agreements are as follows$140,667 for the years ended September 30:

2012 $37,416 
2013  - 
2014    
2015  - 
Thereafter  - 
Total minimum lease payments  37,416 
Less imputed interest  (424)
Present value of minimum lease payments  36,992 
Less: current maturities of capital lease obligations  36,992 
Noncurrent maturities of capital lease obligations $- 

30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

7.Note 8:LONG-TERM DEBTLong-Term Debt

Everest Group Loan

On May 13, 2011, the Company, certain of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers”), and Everest Group LLC (“Lender”) entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which the Lender agreed to loan the Borrowers an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000 (the “Loan”). The Loan was funded to the Borrowers on May 16, 2011. The Borrowers used the proceeds of the Loan for working capital and other general corporate purposes.


The Loan Agreement providesprovided for a one-year term, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms or extended upon the mutual agreement of all parties. Subject to applicable law, theThe Borrowers will paypaid an annual interest rate equal to 18% on the unpaid principal balance of the Loan. Interest will be payable monthly in arrears commencing on the first day of each calendar month (unless such day is not a business day, in which case interest will be payable on the next succeeding business day) commencing June 1, 2011. Commencing on November 1, 2011, and on the first day of each subsequent calendar month, the Borrowers will bewere required to make $50,000 monthly installment payments of principal on the Loan, with the unpaid principal balance to bewas due and payable on the termination date of the Loan.


Pursuant to The Loan was paid off in May 2012.

ICG Convertible Note Transaction

On April 3, 2012 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a General SecurityNote Purchase Agreement (the “Security“ICG Purchase Agreement”) also entered intowith Isaac Capital Group, LLC (“ICG”), which is a related party, pursuant to which ICG agreed to purchase for cash up to $2,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s unsecured Subordinated Convertible Notes (“Notes”). ICG is owned by Jon Isaac, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a director on May 13, 2011, and as a conditionthe Company’s Board. Prior to closingthis transaction, Mr. Isaac owned 403,225 shares, or 16.8% of the LoanCompany’s outstanding common stock. The Purchase Agreement and the other transactions contemplatedNotes, which are unsecured, provide that all amounts payable by the Loan Agreement,Company to ICG under the Borrowers grantedNotes will be due and payable on April 3, 2013 (“Maturity Date”), provided that the Company has the option in its discretion to Lender a security interestextend the Maturity Date by up to one (1) year if no Event of Default (as defined in certain of their assets, including (without limitation) their accounts receivable, books, tort claims, deposit accounts, equipment, general intangibles, inventory, investment property, negotiable collateral, propertythe Purchase Agreement) has occurred and is continuing, and the proceeds thereof.  Certain Borrowers, includingCompany is in material compliance with its agreements and covenants under the Purchase Agreement and the Notes, as of the Maturity Date.

On January 14, 2013, the Company also entered into agreementsand ICG amended the Purchase Agreement to clarify ambiguities and correct inadvertent mistakes related to the warrant issuance timing and the conversion price of a Note, and to amend various anti-dilution features. These changes were consistent with Lender and their banking institutions to grant Lender certain rights and remedies with respect to their deposit accounts.


The Loan Agreement contains representations, warranties and covenantsthe intent of the parties thatat the time they entered into the Purchase Agreement and are customary for transactions similarconsistent with the Company’s past practices related to the Loan.  These include:

Notes and warrants. In particular, the amendment clarifies that the warrants will be issued upon conversion (rather than upon issuance) of the Notes and provides that the conversion price of a Note shall be based upon a floor price of $1.00 per share, regardless if the Company’s stock is trading below that amount at the time ICG elects to convert a Note.

The Purchase Agreement and the Notes, as amended, provide that:

 ·The Borrowers may not prepayNotes will accrue interest at an annual interest rate equal to 8%. All interest will be payable on the unpaid principal amountMaturity Date or upon the conversion of the Loan, in full or in part, without Lender’s consent, during the first six months of the term.applicable Note.

·Lender’s designated representative will have the right to observe meetings of any Borrower’s board of directors solely in a non-voting, non-contributing capacity (provided that such representative may be excluded from sensitive or confidential portions of such meetings).

 ·The Borrowers are prohibited from creating, incurringCompany has the option to prepay each Note, in whole or assuming additional indebtedness except for (among other things) (i) obligationsin part, at any time without premium or penalty.

·If ICG elects to Lender, (ii) trade debt incurredconvert all or any portion of any Note, the Company must issue to ICG on the date of the conversion a warrant (“Contingent Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the number of shares issuable upon conversion. This number of shares is subject to adjustment in the ordinary courseevent of businessstock splits or (iii) purchase money financing and/combinations, stock dividends, certain pro rata distributions, and certain fundamental transactions. Each Contingent Warrant will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years following the date of its issuance at an exercise price equal to 120% of the conversion price of the applicable Note (with the exercise price being subject to adjustment under the same conditions as the number of shares for which the warrant is exercisable.) The Contingent Warrants provide that they may be exercised in whole or equipment leases for new equipment that do not exceed $25,000 in the aggregate during any single fiscal year.part and include a cashless exercise feature.

46

 ·The Borrowers are prohibited from (i) entering into any merger, consolidation, reorganization or recapitalization with another person or entity, or (ii) acquiring all ofNotes provide that, upon the assets, or a material portion of the assets or stock,occurrence of any other personEvent of Default, all amounts payable to ICG will become immediately due and payable without any demand or entity.notice.

40



 ·The Borrowers are prohibitedCompany may issue additional Notes in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1,750,000 to ICG from makingtime to time upon notice to ICG prior to April 3, 2013, provided that each Note must be in a principal amount of at least $100,000.

·The Company (i) is required to provide certain financial and other information to ICG from time to time, (ii) must maintain its corporate existence, business, assets, properties, insurance and records in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Purchase Agreement, (iii) with certain exceptions, must not incur or declaringsuffer to exist any dividend or distribution in respect of their capital stockliens or other equity interests.encumbrances with respect to the Company’s property or assets, (iv) must not make certain loans or investments except in compliance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, and (v) must not enter into certain types of transactions, including dispositions of its assets or business.

The Loan Agreement defines certain events of default including(“Events of Default”) which trigger the acceleration of the Notes include (among other things): (i) the Borrowers’Company’s failure to make any payment required under the Loan AgreementNotes when due (subject to a five-business-daythree-day cure period), (ii) the Borrowers’Company’s failure to comply with theirits covenants and agreements under the LoanPurchase Agreement, the Notes and any other Loantransaction documents, and (iii) the occurrence of a change of control with respect to the Company.  Upon

The Company issued an event of default, Lender would be entitled to immediately accelerate all amounts due and payableinitial Note in respect of the Loan and a cash default fee of $20,000.  Prepayment may not occur in full or in part without the consent of Lender within the first six months of the term.  After November 1, 2011, upon the payment to Lender of a prepayment fee equal to the present values of prospective payments of interest without the prepayment of the Loan, the Borrowers may prepay all or any portion of the unpaid principal amount of $250,000 to ICG on the Loan priorClosing Date. Because the conversion price of $2.53 was less than the stock price, this gave rise to a beneficial conversion feature valued at $166,667. The Company recognized this beneficial conversion feature as a debt discount and additional paid in capital. The discount to the termination date.


Note is being amortized to interest expense until maturity or its earlier repayment or conversion.

On September 10, 2012, ICG elected to convert a Note with a conversion price of $2.38 per share, resulting in the issuance of 109,139 shares. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, warrants to acquire 109,139 shares were issued upon conversion with an exercise price of ($2.38 x 120%) $2.85 per share. Upon conversion of the convertible debt instrument, the remaining debt discount of $97,222 was immediately recognized as interest expense. The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with closing the Loan,debt conversion was $322,927 and was immediately recognized as interest expense.

On December 11, 2012, the Borrowers paid LenderCompany issued a $20,000 cash origination fee and also reimbursed Lender for $20,000second Note to ICG in closing costs, including attorneys’ fees and other out-of-pocket expenses relatedthe principal amount of $250,000, pursuant to the negotiationPurchase Agreement. On December 17, 2012, ICG elected to convert that Note with a conversion price of the Loan Agreement.  Both the cash origination fee and the closing costs were expensed$2.02 per share, resulting in the third fiscal quarterissuance of 2011.


8.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Issuances of Common Stock

November 2010 Equity Issuance Agreement

On November 29, 2010, the Company and Joint Corporation FeelTech Investment Unit 1 (the “Purchaser”) entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the purchase of $200,000 worth123,829 shares of the Company’s common stock $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), overand a three month period.

Under the termswarrant to acquire 123,829 additional shares of the Agreement,Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.43 per share. Upon conversion of the convertible debt instrument, the remaining debt discount was immediately recognized as interest expense so that the original amount related to the beneficial conversion feature of 200,738 was fully expensed.

On March 22, 2013 and March 25, 2013, the Company agreedissued a third and fourth Note to sell,ICG in the principal amount of $500,000 and $250,000 respectively, pursuant to the Purchaser is obligatedPurchase Agreement. Because the conversion price of $1.38 was less than the stock price, this gave rise to purchase, unregisteredbeneficial conversion features valued at $401,386. The Company recognized this beneficial conversion feature as a debt discount and additional paid in capital on March 25, 2013. On March 27, 2013, ICG elected to convert these Notes, resulting in the issuance of 543,962 shares of the Company’s common stock and a warrant to acquire 543,962 additional shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.66 per share. Upon conversion of such Notes, the remaining debt discount of $396,977 was immediately recognized as interest expense. The fair value of the warrants issued in multiple investment tranches (each,connection with the conversion of these Notes was $1,299,884 and was immediately recognized as interest expense.

On March 28, 2013, the Company issued a “Tranche”fifth Note to ICG in the principal amount of $250,000 pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. Because the conversion price of $1.40 was less than the stock price, this gave rise to a beneficial conversion feature valued at $250,000. The Company recognized this beneficial conversion feature as a debt discount and additional paid in capital on March 28, 2013. On March 28, 2013, ICG elected to convert the Note, resulting in the issuance of 178,572 additional shares of the Company’s common stock and a warrant to acquire 178,572 shares at an exercise price of $1.68 per share. Upon conversion of such Note, the debt discount of $250,000 was immediately recognized as interest expense. The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the conversion of the Note was $589,442 and was immediately recognized as interest expense.

The Company intends to use the proceeds of all Notes issued in connection with the Purchase Agreement for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

47

Note 9:Stockholder’s Equity

Issuances of Common Stock

December 2011 Equity Issuance

On December 12, 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with each of Isaac Capital Group LLC (“ICG”), which is a related party, John Kocmur (“Kocmur”), Kingston Diversified Holdings LLC (“Kingston”), Augustus Gardini, L.P. (“Augustus”) and Lausanne LLC (“Lausanne” and collectively with ICG, Kocmur, Kingston and Augustus, the “Purchasers”) pursuant to which the Company’s issued and sold an aggregate of 1,612,899 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate purchase price equal to $2.0 million. Each of ICG, Kocmur and Kingston (the “Lead Purchasers”) invested $500,000 and were issued 403,225 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, and each of Augustus and Lausanne invested $250,000 and were issued 201,612 shares of the Company’s Common Stock.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement:

·The per share purchase price was $1.24, which was the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock, as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market, on December 12, 2011, the date of the closing of the purchase and sale.

·Each Lead Purchaser was given the right, until the date that purchaser beneficially owns less than 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, to nominate one director for election by the Company’s stockholders at each meeting of the stockholders at which directors are to be elected, and to designate a replacement director to fill any vacancy if the director previously designated or nominated by that purchaser ceases for any reason to be a director.

March 2012 Equity Issuance

In March 2012, the Company issued 45,180 shares of its common stock in exchange for a cash payment of $150,000.

June 2012 Equity Issuance

In June 2012, the Company issued 36,364 shares of its common stock in exchange for a cash payment of $200,000.

August 2013 Equity Issuance

On August 22, 2013, the Company agreed to issue 15,773 shares of common stock to a software developer in exchange for professional services valued at an aggregate of $50,000. The per share price in each Tranchevaluation associated with the issuance was determined by adding (i) $0.50 and (ii)$3.17, which was equal to the average closing price for the Common Stockof our common stock as reported byon the NASDAQ Capital Market foron the 90-day period immediately preceding (but not including) the closing date of the transaction. Pursuant to applicable Tranche.NASDAQ Listing Rules, the share issuance is subject to stockholder approval of our new 2013 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, which the Company intends to seek at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

September 2013 Equity Issuance

On September 9, 2013, we issued 200,000 shares to Novalk Apps S.A.S. in exchange for certain customer relationship manager, or CRM, software assets acquired pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of the same date. Such assets were valued at an aggregate of $994,000. The Agreementper share purchase price for such shares was satisfied by$4.97, which was equal to the Purchaserclosing price of our common stock as follows:

reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction.

On September 30, 2013, we issued 44,233 shares of common stock to John Kocmur, a member of our Board of Directors, in exchange for a cash payment of $152,160. The per share purchase price for such shares was $3.44, which was equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction.

Note Conversions

In September and December 2012 and March 2013, ICG elected to convert five Notes, resulting in the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to acquire additional shares of the Company’s common stock. See Note 10.


48
 ·$50,000 was wired to the Company on December 3, 2010 in exchange for the Company’s issuance of 8,421 shares of Common Stock (determined by using the $5.94 per share purchase price applicable to the first Tranche).

·$50,000 was wired to

Form S-3 Shelf Registration Statement

On March 20, 2013, the Company’s designated account on December 22, 2010 in exchange for the issuance of 7,383 shares (determined by using the $6.77 per share purchase price applicable to the second Tranche).


·$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on January 22, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 7,057 shares (determined by using the $7.09 per share purchase price applicable to the third Tranche).

·$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on February 25, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 7,620 shares (determined by using the $6.56 per share purchase price applicable to the fourth Tranche).

The Company issued and sold the shares of Common Stock to the Purchaser in reliancefiled a Registration Statement on the exemption provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D promulgated byForm S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

March 2011 Equity Issuance Agreement

On March 22, 2011,May 6, 2013, the Company filed an amendment to such Registration Statement on Form S-3 (as amended, the “Shelf Registration Statement”). Pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement, which became effective May 16, 2013, the Company may offer and six new investors (the “March Purchasers”) entered intosell, from time to time in one or more offerings, any combination of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, or units having a maximum aggregate offering price of $10,000,000. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from any sale of securities covered by the Shelf Registration Statement and the prospectus contained therein for general corporate purposes.

Increase in Shares Under Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Purchase Agreement (the “March Agreement”), pursuantPlan

At the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved a proposal to whichincrease the March Purchasers committed to purchase an aggregatenumber of $150,000 worthshares of the Company’s common stock $0.001 par value per share, over a three month period.


Under the terms of the March Agreement, the Company agreed to sell, and each March Purchaser is obligated to purchase by a specified date, Common Stockavailable for an aggregate purchase price of $25,000.  The per share price is to be determined by adding (i) $0.50 and (ii) the average closing price for the Common Stock as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market for the 90-day period immediately preceding (but not including) the closing date of the applicable purchase.

·$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on March 28, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 9,061 shares (determined by using the $5.52 per share purchase price applicable).

·$50,000 was wired to the Company’s designated account on April 26, 2011 in exchange for the issuance of 10,656 shares (determined by using the $4.69 per share purchase price applicable).

41


·An additional $50,000 was due to be wired to the Company’s designated account on or before May 25, 2011, but such amount was never paid by the applicable March Purchasers.  On or about July 7, 2011, the Company provided written notice to the applicable March Purchasers that it considered them to be in material breach of their agreements with the Company.  Under the applicable March Agreements, the Company is entitled to, among other potential remedies; repurchase any and all shares previously issued to the March Purchasers and their affiliates for an amount equal to the applicable purchase price paid for such shares less $0.50 per share.  The March Purchasers have not responded to the Company’s notice of breach.  The Company has taken action to preserve its rights under the March Agreements while it considers the potential remedies that could be pursued.

Stock Purchase Agreements – August/September 2011

As previously disclosed, on August 29, 2011 and September 29, 2011, respectively, the Company entered into a series of Stock Purchase Agreements (the “Stock Purchase Agreements”) with four investors (the “Investors”).  Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreements, the Investors agreed to purchase an aggregate of 816,327 shares of Common Stock in a private placement transaction for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million.  Additional information regarding the Stock Purchase Agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby was set forth in a definitive proxy statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2011. Stockholder approval of the Stock Purchase Agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby was obtained at a special meeting on November 24, 2011.

On November 30, 2011, the Investors failed to perform their obligations under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Purchase Agreements by, among other things, failingPlan from 140,000 to pay the purchase price described above.  Accordingly, the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreements were never consummated, and the Company sent the Investors a notice of termination of the Stock Purchase Agreements on December 12, 2011.  The Company did not incur any penalties in connection with its termination of the Stock Purchase Agreements.

340,000 shares.

Series E Convertible Preferred Stock


During the year ended September 30, 2002, pursuant to an existing tender offer, holders of 13,184 shares of the Company’s common stock exchanged said shares for 131,840 shares of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock, at the then $0.85 market value of the common stock. The shares carry a $0.30 per share liquidation preference and accrue dividends at the rate of 5% per annum on the liquidation preference per share, payable quarterly from legally available funds. If such funds are not available, dividends shall continue to accumulate until they can be paid from legally available funds. Holders of the preferred shares are entitled, after two years from issuance, to convert them into common shares on a hundred-to-one basis together with payment of $0.45 per converted share.


Treasury Stock

The Company’s treasury stock consists of shares repurchased on the open market or shares received through various agreements with third parties.  The value of such shares is determined based on cash paid or quoted market prices.
On May 25, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors terminated its pre-existing stock repurchase plan and replaced it with a new plan authorizing repurchases of up to $1,000,000 of common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.  The repurchase plan was increased by another $500,000 on October 23, 2008.  During the year ended September 30, 2011 there were no stock repurchases. In 2010, the Company acquired an aggregate of 1,341 shares of common stock for an aggregate repurchase price of $25,882.

Dividends


During each of the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, the Company accrued dividends of $1,918, and $1,918, respectively, payable to holders of Series E preferred stock. No dividends were paid in 20112013 or 2010.

2012.

Note 10:Warrants

As discussed in Note 8, the Company issued several Notes and converted them into shares of common stock, resulting in the issuance of warrants. The following table summarizes information about the Company’s warrants at September 30, 2013:

  Number of Units  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
  Intrinsic Value 
             
Outstanding at September 30, 2012  109,139  $2.85   4.95   253,202 
Granted  846,363   1.78         
Exercised              
Outstanding at September 30, 2013  955,502  $1.90   4.39   1,471,998 
Exerciseable at September 30, 2013  955,502  $1.90   4.39   1,471,998 

The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:

Volatility 121%-127%
Risk-free interest rate .74% -.89%
Expected term 5 years
Forfeiture rate0%
Dividend yield rate0%


49
9.RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES

On January 4, 2010, our Board

Note 11:Stock Based Compensation

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company previously maintained the 2003 Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan (“2003 Plan”), which was approved by the Company’s stockholders, for the issuance of Directors approved a reduction in force that resultedstock-based compensation awards. As amended, the Company was permitted to issue an aggregate of 340,000 shares of common stock under the 2003 Plan. All Company personnel and contractors are eligible to participate in the termination of approximately 33%2003 Plan. By its terms, the 2003 Plan expired on July 21, 2013 (which was the tenth anniversary of the Company's workforce, effective January 7, 2010.  On February 23, 2010, ourdate of the 2003 Plan), and no new awards were made thereafter. The Company anticipates implementing a new equity incentive plan to replace the 2003 Plan.

In September 2011, in an effort to preserve cash, the Board, after consultation with the Compensation Committee, entered into an agreement to compensate the members of Directors approvedthe Board for their monthly retainer and other services as directors and/or members of the Board’s various standing committees through the award of shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2003 Plan. Since inception an additional reduction in force that resulted in the terminationaggregate of approximately 20%83,495 shares were issued to members of our workforce, effective March 4, 2010.  These reductions in force were related to our ongoing restructuring and cost reduction efforts as the Board of Directors explores a variety of strategic alternatives, including the potential sale of the Company or certain of its assets and/or the acquisition of other entities or businesses.

The Company incurred charges of $143,000 in connection with the reductions in force, consisting of one-time employee termination benefits.  All amounts were paid as of September 30, 2010.

On November 30, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a reduction in force that resulted in the termination of 36 employees of the Company, or approximately 60% of the Company’s workforce, effective December 1, 2010.   The reduction in force was related to the Company’s ongoing restructuring and cost reduction efforts and strategy of focusing its resources on the development and expansion of its core InstantProfile product, the successor to the Company’s LEC-billed directory product.  All terminated employees were involved in the marketing and sale of the Company’s InstantPromote product by its subsidiary, Local Marketing Experts, Inc.

42


The Company incurred expenses of $99,319 in connection with the reduction in force, of which $37,500 was incurred for one-time employee termination benefits payable in cash.  The remaining expenses relate to salaries and wages payable in cash to the affected employees which were paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

In May 2011 the Company ceased the Direct Sales business and migrated the remaining customers to Reach Local in exchange for ten and five percent of gross revenues derived from such customers during the first and second year, respectively.  The Company recorded $5,773 in revenues for this agreement duringDirectors. During the year ended September 30, 2011.  In connection2013, 26,484 shares were issued to the Board of Directors.

As of September 30, 2013, there were 134,816 shares authorized under the 2003 Plan that were granted and remain outstanding and fully vested.

The following table sets forth the activity with respect to unvested restricted stock grants (results reported in post-split amounts):

Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 20111,342
Granted
Forfeited(26)
Vested(1,053)
Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 2012263
Granted
Forfeited
Vested(263)
Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 20130

Stock Option Awards

From time to time, the Company grants stock option awards to officers and employees. Such awards are valued based on the grant date fair value of the instruments, net of estimated forfeitures, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the discontinued Direct Sales business, seven employees were terminated.   See Note 3.

following assumptions:

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  September 30, 2013  September 30, 2012 
       
Volatility  124%-127%    
Risk-free interest rate  .08%-.66%    
Expected term  1-3.77 years    
Forfeiture rate  10%    
Dividend yield rate  0%    

The volatility used was based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock, which management considers to be the best indicator of expected future volatility. The risk free interest rate was determined based on treasury securities with maturities equal to the expected term of the underlying award. The expected term was determined based on the simplified method outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110.

Stock option awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. During the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized expense of $173,073 and $16,942, respectively, associated with stock option awards. At September 30, 2013, all stock compensation expense associated with issued awards has been recognized.


50
10.NET LOSS PER SHARE

The following summarizes stock option activity for the year ended September 30, 2013:

     Weighted  Weighted    
     Average  Average    
  Number of  Exercise  Remaining    
  Shares  Price  Contractual Life  Intrinsic Value 
Outstanding at September 30, 2012               
Granted  225,000  $8.47         
Exercised               
Forfeited               
Outstanding at September 30, 2013  225,000  $8.47   5.9    
Exercisable at September 30, 2013  25,000  $10.00   0.6    

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s non-vested shares as of September 30, 2013:

     Weighted-Average 
  Number of  Grant-Date 
Non-vested Shares Shares  Fair Value 
Nonvested at September 30, 2012       
Granted  200,000  $2.18 
Nonvested at September 30, 2013  200,000  $2.18 

Note 12:Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding do not include shares of restricted stock that have not yet vested, although such shares are included as outstanding shares in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable from restricted shares, stock options, convertible debt and convertible preferred stock. Preferred stock dividends are subtracted from net loss to determine the amount available to common stockholders.


The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

  Year Ended September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Loss from continuing operations $(5,749,722) $(1,587,641)
Less: preferred stock dividends  (1,918)  (1,918)
Loss from continuing operations applicable to common stock  (5,751,640)  (1,589,559)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  2,708   12,433 
Net loss applicable to common stock $(5,748,932) $(1,577,126)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  3,131,420   2,068,828 
         
Earnings per share - basic and diluted:        
Loss from continuing operations $(1.84) $(0.77)
Discontinued operations  0.00   0.01 
Net loss $(1.84) $(0.76)

51

  Year Ended September 30, 
  2011  2010 
       
Loss from continuing operations $(5,383,893) $(8,578,009)
Less: preferred stock dividends  (1,918)  (1,918)
Loss from continuing operations        
applicable to common stock  (5,385,811)  (8,579,927)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  (118,355)  1,121,291 
Net loss applicable to common stock $(5,504,166) $(7,458,636)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding -        
basic and diluted  664,167   631,503 
         
Earnings per share - basic and diluted1:
        
Loss from continuing operations $(8.11) $(13.59)
Discontinued operations  (0.18)  1.78 
Net loss $(8.29) $(11.81)

1 Certain amounts may not total due to rounding of individual components.

The following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of net loss per share because the effects are antidilutive based on the application of the treasury stock method and/or because the Company incurred net losses during the period:


  September 30, 
  2011  2010 
       
Options to purchase shares of common stock  24,013   5,263 
Series E convertible preferred stock  127,840   127,840 
Shares of non-vested restricted stock  1,342   4,903 
   153,195   138,006 

43


  Year Ended September 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Options to purchase shares of common stock  225,000    
Warrants to purchase shares of common stock  955,502   109,139 
Series E convertible preferred stock  127,840   127,840 
Shares of non-vested restricted stock     263 
Total potentially dilutive shares  1,308,342   237,242 

11.Note 13:COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESRestructuring Activities

In May 2011 the Company ceased the Direct Sales business and migrated the remaining customers to Reach Local in exchange for 10% and 5% of gross revenues derived from such customers during the first and second year, respectively. The Company recorded $816 and $6,053 in revenues for this agreement during the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In connection with the discontinued Direct Sales business, seven employees were terminated. See Note 4.

Note 14:Related Party Transactions

Convertible Notes with ICG

As described in Note 8, during 2012 and 2013 the Company entered into a series of convertible note purchase agreements with ICG, an entity owned by Jon Isaac, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and a director on the Company’s Board group. Under these agreements, the Company received gross proceeds of $1,250,000 and $250,000 during the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Under the terms of these agreements, ICG executed its conversion option on all then-outstanding notes during the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. In exchange for the conversion of $1,250,000 of convertible notes during the year ended September 30, 2013, ICG received an aggregate of 846,363 of shares of common stock and, upon conversion, ICG also received warrants to acquire an additional 846,363 shares of common stock. In exchange for the conversion of $250,000 of convertible notes during the year ended September 30, 2012, ICG received an aggregate of 109,139 of shares of common stock and, upon conversion, ICG also received warrants to acquire an additional 109,139 shares of common stock.

Because the conversion price under ICG’s notes was less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of issuance, the Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature which was treated as a debt discount and amortized on a straight line basis as interest expense until the date of conversion, at which time all remaining debt discount was recognized as interest expense. Additionally, the fair value of the warrants that were contingently issuable to ICG upon conversion were recognized as additional interest expense.

During the years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized total interest expense of $3,291,466 and $489,594 associated with the ICG notes.

Issuance of Common Stock with ICG

As described in Note 9, during the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 403,225 shares of common stock to ICG in exchange for gross proceeds of $500,000.

Note 15:

Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases and Service Contracts


The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under long-term operating leases expiring through fiscal year 2014.2016. Rent expense under these leases was $465,811$152,372 and $519,716$350,822 for the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 2010,2012, respectively. The Company has also entered into several non-cancelable service contracts.

52

As of September 30, 2011,2013, future minimum annual lease payments under operating lease agreements and non-cancelable service contracts for fiscal years ended September 30 are as follows:


2012 $375,747 
2013  114,965 
2014  24,159 
2015    
2016  - 
Thereafter�� - 
  $514,871 

The Company is also a party to certain capital leases – see Note 6.

Change in Officers and Employment Agreements

On November 23, 2009, the Company and Richard F. Sommer, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, entered into an amendment to Mr. Sommer’s Employment Agreement.  The amendment, which was effective as of October 29, 2009, provided that Mr. Sommer was entitled to an option to purchase 26,316 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $18.53 per share, which was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The option was granted pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan and was to vest according to the following schedule:  25% on October 29, 2010 (the first anniversary of the date of grant) and 1/36 of the remainder each month beginning on November 29, 2010.  Previously, the Employment Agreement provided that Mr. Sommer was entitled to a success fee payable in cash equal to 2% of the excess above $9,000,000 of any cash distributed to or received by the Company’s stockholders in the form of a dividend, in the event of liquidation or upon a change of control.

On November 25, 2009, Rajeev Seshadri, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, entered into a Separation Agreement and Full Release of Claims with the Company in connection with his departure as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, which was agreed upon on November 19, 2009 and which took effect on January 2, 2010 (the “Resignation Date”).  Under the terms of the Separation Agreement and in accordance with his employment agreement, the Company continued to pay Mr. Seshadri his base salary for three months following the Resignation Date (less applicable taxes and other withholdings).  Mr. Seshadri could also elect to receive such payment (the gross amount of which is $53,750) in a lump sum on the Resignation Date.  The $15,000 bonus to which Mr. Seshadri was entitled under his employment agreement for the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 was paid in a lump sum on the Resignation Date.  The Company paid Mr. Seshadri’s COBRA payments for three months and reimbursed his reasonable attorneys’ fees related to the negotiation of the Separation Agreement.  The Separation Agreement also provided for Mr. Seshadri to serve as a consultant to the Company until January 31, 2010 for at least 16 hours per week at a rate of $230 per hour.   Finally, Mr. Seshadri continued to be entitled to exercise his vested stock options in accordance with the terms of the applicable stock option agreements for a period of 180 days from the date of his resignation; his unvested options thereafter would be forfeited and cancelled.

In exchange for the payments described above, Mr. Seshadri provided a full release of claims arising out of, or relating to, his employment with the Company, his termination from the position of Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and/or his resignation.  The Separation Agreement also contained customary provisions with respect to confidentiality and non-solicitation, as well as mutual covenants on the part of Mr. Seshadri and the Company regarding public statements and non-disparagement.  As of September 30, 2010, all amounts pertaining to this separation have been paid.

Also on November 19, 2009, the Company appointed Lawrence W. Tomsic to replace Mr. Seshadri as its Chief Financial Officer, effective on the Resignation Date.  In connection with Mr. Tomsic’s appointment as Chief Financial Officer, he and the Company were to enter into an employment agreement providing for a one-year employment term that could be extended upon the mutual agreement of the Company and Mr. Tomsic.

Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Tomsic was to be paid an annual salary of $215,000 and was eligible to receive a bonus of up to $60,000 per year if the Company achieves certain performance targets established by the Company’s Board of Directors and/or its Compensation Committee.  Mr. Tomsic was to be granted an option to purchase 10,526 shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan.  The Employment Agreement also provided that the Company would reimburse Mr. Tomsic for reasonable business expenses and allow him to participate in its regular benefit programs.

If the Company terminates Mr. Tomsic’s employment without Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement) and certain other conditions are met (including that Mr. Tomsic provide a valid release of claims in favor of the Company), Mr. Tomsic will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to his then current monthly salary for each full 12-month period following the date on which Mr. Tomsic first began providing services to the Company.

44


On January 4, 2010, Mr. Sommer resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  As a result of his departure, Mr. Sommer also resigned as a member of our Board of Directors.  Mr. Sommer did not receive any severance as part of his resignation.  All 25,000 options granted on November 23, 2009 were forfeited.  Given this forfeiture, the Company elected not to expense such options because the effects on the financial statements would not have been material.  Following Mr. Sommer’s departure, Kevin A. Hall was appointed as our interim Chief Operating Officer (COO).

On May 20, 2010, the Board of Directors of LiveDeal appointed Kevin A. Hall as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.  Mr. Hall’s compensation and benefits were not affected by his appointment as President of the Company.

On March 24, 2011 Mr. Hall was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  In connection with his appointment, Mr. Hall entered into an employment agreement with the Company which provides for a two-year term of employment, which may be extended upon the parties’ mutual agreement, and an annual base salary of $225,000.  Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive an annual performance bonus in the event that the Company reaches certain performance measures established by the Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee.  The performance milestones will be weighted 75% financial and 25% personal, and Mr. Hall’s target bonus will be equal to 50% of his base salary.

The agreement further provides that Mr. Hall is entitled to an option to purchase 13,487 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share, which was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The option was granted pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan and will vest according to the following schedule:  25% on March 24, 2012 (the first anniversary of the grant date) and 1/36 of the remainder each month beginning on April 24, 2012.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested shares will immediately vest and become exercisable upon a change in control.

If the Company terminates Mr. Hall’s employment during the first year of his term of employment without cause (as defined in the agreement) and certain other conditions are met (including that Mr. Hall provide a valid release of claims in favor of the Company), Mr. Hall will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance payment equal to his then current monthly salary for three months.  After March 24, 2012 but prior to the end of his term of employment, if the Company terminates Mr. Hall’s employment without cause, Mr. Hall will be entitled to a severance payment equal to his then current monthly salary for six months.  The agreement also provides that the Company will reimburse Mr. Hall for reasonable business expenses and allows him to participate in its regular benefit programs.

On May 20, 2011, in connection with the Company’s continued employment of Mr. Tomsic as its Chief Financial Officer, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Tomsic.  This agreement provides for a one-year term of employment, which may be extended upon the parties’ mutual agreement, and an annual base salary of $220,000.  Mr. Tomsic will be entitled to receive an annual performance bonus in the event that the Company reaches certain performance measures established by the Chief Executive Officer or the Board of Directors (or its Compensation Committee).  Mr. Tomsic’s target bonus will be equal to $80,000.

Pursuant to the employment agreement, on May 20, 2011, Mr. Tomsic was granted an option to purchase 10,526 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.77 per share, which was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The options will vest and be exercisable according to the following schedule: 3,728 options vesting immediately and the remainder shall vest 1/31 at the end of each month thereafter over the next 31 months so long as Mr. Tomsic continues to provide services to the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all unvested shares will immediately vest and become exercisable upon a change of control.

2014  211,767 
2015  201,630 
2016  57,283 
2017   
2018   
Thereafter   
  $470,680 

Litigation


The Company is party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. Management believes that the outcome of pending legal proceedings will not, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, and results of operations, cash flows or liquidity.


Except as described below, as of September 30, 2011,2013, the Company was not a party to any pending material legal proceedings other than claims that arise in the normal conduct of its business. While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these routine proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. If an unfavorable ruling were to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company’s net income in the period in which a ruling occurs. The Company’s estimate of the potential impact of the following legal proceedings on its financial position and its results of operation could change in the future.


45


Global Education Services, Inc. v. LiveDeal, Inc.


On June 6, 2008, Global Education Services, Inc. ("GES"), which we refer to as GES, filed a consumer class actionfraud lawsuit against us in the Company in King County (Washington) Superior Court in the State of Washington, alleging that the Company'sour use of activator checks violated the Washington Consumer Protection Act.Act and seeking class certification pursuant to Washington law. GES seekssought injunctive relief against the Company'sour use of theactivator checks, as well as judgmentdamages in an amount equal to three times the alleged damages allegedly sustained by the members of the class. LiveDealputative class, exemplary damages for the alleged violation of law, and its fees and costs. We denied the allegations of the complaint and iscommenced defending the litigation.

Early in 2010, the Court denied both parties’ dispositive motions, after oral argument.   Afterat which time they commenced settlement discussions faileddiscussions. The parties reached a settlement and entered into a settlement agreement on or about November 5, 2012.

The settlement agreement required $150,000 to result in resolution,be paid to plaintiff’s counsel, $10,000 to be paid to GES as the parties resumed“representative plaintiff,” and $70 to be paid to each eligible class member. The Court granted final approval of the settlement on April 26, 2013 and the Court’s order became final on May 27, 2013. All class member claims have been paid and the last attorneys’ fee payment was made on November 23, 2013. Accordingly, the litigation is fully resolved and the matter closed.

J3 Harmon LLC v. LiveDeal, Inc.

On February 9, 2012, J3 Harmon LLC, which we refer to as J3, filed a lawsuit against us in the fallSuperior Court for Maricopa County in the State of 2011. GES’ motionArizona, alleging breach of a commercial lease agreement. J3 sought damages for class certification is briefedalleged unpaid rents during the lease term as well as alleged damages for storage costs after the expiration of the lease term. We denied the allegations and scheduled to be heard on January 27, 2012. The parties continue to discuss settlement pending hearingasserted various affirmative defenses. In September 2012, the Maricopa County Superior Court entered a judgment in favor of J3 in the sum of $62,886.13.   We appealed this judgment.

On October 1, 2013, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part on the motion. principal damages and remanded the matter for judgment. Subsequently, the Maricopa County Superior Court entered Judgment on Mandate against the Company in the principal sum of $46,636.31 and attorneys’ fees of $5,624.40, with post-judgment interest from October 3, 2012. There is no further basis for appeal by the Company. The Company anticipates paying the judgment during the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2014 and, upon such payment, the matter will be resolved. As of September 30, 2013, the Company maintained an accrual of $52,261 related to this matter.

53

LEC Billings

The Company has historically billed a significant amount of our legacy business revenues through LEC billing channels. The largest LEC billing companies ceased billing for third parties in 2012. .If we are not able to obtain alternative billing methods for these customers, the number of legacy subscribers and our revenues will decline, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. The Company had approximately $73,000 of revenues billed through LEC billing channels for the year ended September 30, 2013. LEC billing channel costs related to those revenues equaled approximately $171,000 for the year ended September 30, 2013.

Except as referenced above, the Company has not recorded any accruals pertaining to its legal proceedings except as referenced above, as they do not meet the criteria for accrual under FASB ASC 450.


12.Note 16:PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXESProvision for Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A full valuation allowance is established against all net deferred tax assets as of September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 based on estimates of recoverability. While the Company has optimistic plans for its business strategy, it determined that such a valuation allowance was necessary given the current and expected near term losses and the uncertainty with respect to its ability to generate sufficient profits from its new business model.


Because of the impacts of the valuation allowance, there was no income tax expense or benefit for the year ended September 30, 2011.  There was a current income tax benefit of $230,382 for the year ended September 30, 2010 reflecting an adjustment to income tax receivable for net operating loss carrybacks as a result of true-ups to our final 2009 tax return that was filed during fiscal 2010.


2013.

A reconciliation of the differences between the effective and statutory income tax rates for years ended September 30, is as follows:

  2011  2010 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
             
Federal statutory rates $(1,870,764)  34% $(2,613,614)  34%
State income taxes  (184,942)  3%  (258,378)  3%
Write off of deferred tax asset                
related to stock based compensation  184,050   (3)%  50,905   (1)%
Valuation allowance against net                
deferred tax assets  1,920,862   (35)%  2,786,003   (36)%
Other  (49,206)  1%  (195,298)  3%
Effective rate $-   0% $(230,382)  3%

  2013  2012 
  Amount  Percent  Amount  Percent 
             
Federal statutory rates $(1,953,982)  34%  $(535,573)  34% 
State income taxes  (193,167)  3%   (52,946)  3% 
Write off of deferred tax asset related to vested restricted stock     0%   10,670   (1%)
Permanent differences  15,967   (0%)  3,411   (0%)
Valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets  2,131,183   (37%)  574,438   (36%)
Other      0%       0% 
Effective rate $   0%  $   0% 

At September 30, deferred income tax assets and liabilities were comprised of:

  2013  2012 
Deferred income tax asset, current:        
Book to tax differences in accounts receivable $382,218  $582,549 
Book to tax differences in prepaid assets and accrued expenses  8,425   (7,774)
Total deferred income tax asset, current  390,643   574,775 
Less: valuation allowance  (390,643)  (574,775)
Deferred income tax asset, current, net      
         
Deferred income tax asset, long-term:        
Net operating loss carryforwards  12,821,092   10,012,906 
Book to tax differences for stock based compensation  6,407   6,407 
Book to tax differences in intangible assets  6,693,536   6,961,861 
Book to tax differences in other  326   326 
Book to tax differences in depreciation  (2,297,221)  (2,072,674)
Total deferred income tax asset, long-term  17,224,140   14,908,825 
Less: valuation allowance  (17,224,140)  (14,908,825)
Deferred income tax asset, net      
         
Total deferred income tax asset $  $ 

54

  2011  2010 
Deferred income tax asset, current:      
Book to tax differences in accounts receivable $738,671  $643,209 
Book to tax differences in prepaid assets and accrued expenses  (20,502)  (43,011)
Total deferred income tax asset, current  718,169   600,198 
Less: valuation allowance  (718,169)  (600,198)
Deferred income tax asset, current, net  -   - 
         
Deferred income tax asset, long-term:        
Net operating loss carryforwards  9,060,073   7,084,995 
Book to tax differences for stock based compensation  17,706   187,614 
Book to tax differences in intangible assets  7,295,815   7,234,473 
Book to tax differences in other assets  326   326 
Book to tax differences in depreciation  (1,798,370)  (1,734,750)
Total deferred income tax asset, long-term  14,575,550   12,772,658 
Less: valuation allowance  (14,575,550)  (12,772,658)
Deferred income tax asset, net  -   - 
         
Total deferred income tax asset $-  $- 

46


The Company has recorded as of September 30, 2013 a valuation allowance of $17,224,140, as it believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realize in future years. Management has based its assessment on available historical and projected operating results.

The Company annually conducts an analysis of its tax positions and has concluded that it has no uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2011.


2013.

As part of its deferred tax assets, the Company has net operating loss carryforwardscarry-forwards resulting from its acquisition of LiveDeal, Inc. in fiscal 2007. Such amounts are subject to IRS code section 382 limitations and expire in 2027. The 2007 to 2010 tax years are still subject to audit.


13.Note 17:CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISKConcentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains cash balances at banks in California and Nevada. Accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000 per institution as of September 30, 2011.  2013. At times, balances may exceed federally insured limits.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily trade accounts receivable. The trade accounts receivable are due primarily from business customers over widespread geographical locations within the LEC billing areas across the United States. The Company historically has experienced significant dilution and customer credits due to billing difficulties and uncollectible trade accounts receivable. The Company estimates and provides an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. The handling and processing of cash receipts pertaining to trade accounts receivable is maintained primarily by three third-party billing companies. The Company is dependent upon these billing companies for collection of its accounts receivable. The billing companies and LECs charge fees for their services, which are netted against the gross accounts receivable balance. The billing companies also apply holdbacks to the remittances for potentially uncollectible accounts. These amounts will vary due to numerous factors and the Company may not be certain as to the actual amounts on any specific billing submittal until several months after that submittal. The Company estimates the amount of these charges and holdbacks based on historical experience and subsequent information received from the billing companies. The Company also estimates uncollectible account balances and provides an allowance for such estimates. The billing companies retain certain holdbacks that may not be collected by the Company for a period extending beyond one year. Additionally, certain other billings’ channels consisting of billings submitted to LEC Processors through third parties were discontinued. As such, a significant portion of the receivables at September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 pertaining to LEC service providers represent the holdbacks described above.


The Company has concentrations of receivables with respect to certain wholesale accounts and remaining holdbacks with LEC service providers. Three such entities accounted for 31%44%, 25% and 20%18% of gross receivables at September 30, 2011.  Three such entities accounted for 27%2013 as compared to 35%, 27% and 16%15% of gross receivables at September 30, 2010.


2012.

14.Note 18:STOCK-BASED COMPENSATIONSegment Reporting
Restricted Stock Awards

The Company maintains its 2003 Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan (“2003 Plan”) for the issuance of stock-based compensation awards.  As amended, the Company is permitted to issue an aggregate of 50,000 shares of common stock under the plan.  All Company personnel and contractors are eligible to participate in the plan.

In September 2011, in an effort to preserve cash, the Board, after consultation with the Compensation Committee, entered into an agreement to compensate the members of the Board for their monthly retainer and other services as directors and/or members of the Board’s various standing committees through the award of shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2003 Plan.  Under the terms of this agreement, each non-employee director receives a monthly award of fully vested shares of common stock, with the number of shares determined by dividing $3,833 by the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.  The Company granted an aggregate of 9,184 shares of common stock and recognized expense of $15,333 related to this agreement for services rendered for the month of August 2011. For services rendered for the month of September 2011, the Company recorded $15,333 in accounts payable as of September 30, 2011, which will be paid through the issuance of shares in October 2011. No share issuances for service were made during the year ended September 30, 2010.

As of September 30, 2011, there were 60,332 shares authorized under the 2003 Plan that were granted and remain outstanding, of which 58,990 have vested and 1,342 are in the form of restricted stock.  These shares of restricted stock were granted to the Company’s service providers, officers and directors.  Of the 1,342 unvested restricted shares, 1,053 shares vest on a cliff basis three years from the date of grant and 289 shares vest on a cliff basis 10 years from the date of grant.  Certain market performance criteria may accelerate the vesting of a portion of these awards if the stock price exceeds $50 per share. 

47

The following table sets forth the activity with respect to unvested restricted stock grants (results reported in post-split amounts):

Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 200911,203
Granted-
Forfeited(3,895)
Vested(2,405)
Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 20104,903
Granted-
Forfeited(8)
Vested(3,553)
Outstanding (unvested) at September 30, 20111,342

During the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 the Company recognized compensation expense of $38,231 and $100,980 respectively, under the 2003 Plan and other restricted stock issuances.  Due to the immateriality of the remaining expense, all expense associated with nonvested awards (net of forfeitures of 70% for awards vesting in 2013 and 0% for awards vesting in October 2011) was recognized during the year ended September 30, 2011.  No further expense associated with unvested awards is expected unless the Company’s actual forfeiture rate differs from its expected forfeiture rate, in which the Company could incur up to $38,917 of additional expense.

Stock Option Awards:

From time to time, the Company grants stock option awards to officers and employees.  Such awards are valued based on the grant date fair value of the instruments, net of estimated forfeitures, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  
September
30, 2011
  
September
30, 2010
 
Volatility  107-108%  97%
Risk-free interest rate  1.8-2.8%  2.2%
Expected term 5.4-6.0 years  6.0 years 
Forfeiture rate  0-50%  40%
Dividend yield rate  0%  0%

The volatility used was based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock, which management considers to be the best indicator of expected future volatility.  The risk free interest rate was determined based on treasury securities with maturities equal to the expected term of the underlying award.  The expected term was determined based on the simplified method outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110.

On November 23, 2009, the Company granted an aggregate of 26,316 options to Richard Sommer, the Company’s then-current Chief Executive Officer. In connection with Mr. Sommer’s resignation on January 4, 2010, all such options were forfeited.  Given this forfeiture, the Company elected not to expense such options because the effects on the financial statements would not have been material.  No other options were granted during the year ended September 30, 2010.

As discussed in Note 11, on March 24, 2011, Mr. Hall was granted an option to purchase 13,487 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.53 per share, which was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The option was granted pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Stock Plan and will vest according to the following schedule:  25% on March 24, 2012 (the first anniversary of the grant date) and 1/36 of the remainder each month beginning on April 24, 2012.  The grant date fair value of this award was $19,833 based on a Black-Scholes option pricing model described above and is being expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

As discussed in Note 10, on May 20, 2011, Mr. Tomsic was granted an option to purchase 10,526 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.77 per share, which was equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The options will vest and be exercisable according to the following schedule: 3,728 options vesting immediately and the remainder shall vest 1/31 at the end of each month thereafter over the next 31 months so long as Mr. Tomsic continues to provide services to the Company.  The grant date fair value of this award was $21,446 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model described above, with $11,218 expensed on grant date and the remaining amount being expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

Stock option awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.  During the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of $38,231 and $38,448, respectively, associated with stock option awards. At September 30, 2011, future stock compensation expense (net of estimated forfeitures) not yet recognized was $26,401 and will be recognized over a weighted average remaining vesting period of 3.1 years.  

48


The following summarizes stock option activity for the year ended September 30, 2011:

     Weighted  Weighted  Weighted    
     Average  Average  Average  Aggregate 
  Number of  Exercise  Fair  Remaining  Intrinsic 
  Shares  Price  Value  Contractual Life  Value 
Outstanding at September 30, 2010  5,263             
Granted at market price  24,013      n/m       
Exercised  -              
Forfeited  (5,263) $13.78           
Outstanding at September 30, 2011  24,013  $3.64       9.6  $- 
Exercisable  4,605  $3.77       9.6  $- 

The following table summarizes information about exercise prices for outstanding options at September 30, 2011:

  Exercisable  Unexercisable  Total 
     Weighted     Weighted     Weighted 
  Number  Average  Number  Average  Number  Average 
Range of Exercise Prices Outstanding  Exercise Price  Outstanding  Exercise Price  Outstanding  Exercise Price 
                   
Less than $4.00 per share  4,605  $3.77   19,408   3.61   24,013  $3.64 
Upon the exercise of stock options, the Company may issue new shares or, if circumstances permit, issue shares held as treasury stock.

15.EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

The Company maintains a 401(k) retirement plan for its employees who are eligible to participate in the plan.  The Company made contributions of $0 and $34,336 to the plan for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The company eliminated matching contributions to the 401(k) retirement plan in March 2010.

16.SEGMENT REPORTING

After discontinuing the Company’s Direct Sales business as described in Note 3,4, as of September 30, 2011,2013, the Company only operated one business segment. All of the Company’s revenues are with external customers, are derived from operations in the United States, and no single customer accounts for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues.


17.Note 19:SUBSEQUENT EVENTS DISCLOSURESubsequent Events Disclosure

NASDAQ Compliance Issues

Engagement Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (At-The-Market Offering)

On October 19, 2011, LiveDeal, Inc.January 7, 2014, we entered into an Engagement Agreement (the “Company”“Engagement Agreement”) receivedwith Chardan Capital Markets LLC (“Chardan”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell up to a maximum aggregate amount of 660,000 shares of our common stock from time to time through Chardan as our sales agent, under our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Engagement Agreement will be sold.

Upon delivery of a placement notice thatby the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications Panel (the “Panel”) determined to grant the Company’s request for continued listing on The NASDAQ Capital MarketCompany, and subject to the Company’s demonstrationterms and conditions of compliance with the applicable minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 million by November 30, 2011.


On December 12, 2011, the Company completed an equity financing with five unaffiliated investors for an aggregate cash purchase price of $2.0 million, which is described in more detail below.  The Company issued a total of 1,612,899 new shares of its common stock in connection with the transaction at a price of $1.24 per share, which was equal to the closing bid price ofEngagement Agreement, Chardan may sell the common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the date of the transaction.  As of December 12, 2011, the Company had 725,479 shares of common stock outstanding, which had a book value per share equal to approximately $1.04 based on the Company’s unaudited stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2011.  After giving pro forma effect to the transaction, the Company had 2,338,378 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on September 30, 2011, with a book value per share equal to approximately $1.18 based on the Company’s pro forma unaudited stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2011 giving effect to the equity financing.  As a result of the foregoing, the Company believesby any method that as of September 30, 2011, after giving pro forma effect to the equity financing, its stockholders’ equity exceeds the NASDAQ requirement of $2.5 million for continued listing on The NASDAQ Capital Market.

On December 21, 2011, the Company received written notification from NASDAQ indicating that the Company’s securities will continueis deemed to be listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market based upon the Company’s compliance with the terms of a Panel decision, which required the Company to evidence compliance with the applicable minimum stockholders’ equity requirement of $2.5 million by December 12, 2011.  Accordingly, the NASDAQ hearing process is now closed.
On December 28, 2011, the Company received written notification from NASDAQ that, for the preceding 10 business days (from December 13, 2011 to December 27, 2011), the Company's market value of publicly held shares had been $1.0 million or greater.  As a result, NASDAQ confirmed that the Company had regained compliance with NASDAQ Listingan “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 5550(a)(5).  The Company was previously notified that it had fallen out of compliance with such rule on September 16, 2011.

49


Termination of Stock Purchase Agreements and Related Transactions

As previously disclosed, on August 29, 2011 and September 29, 2011, respectively, the Company entered into a series of Stock Purchase Agreements (the “Stock Purchase Agreements”) with four investors (the “Investors”).  Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreements, the Investors agreed to purchase an aggregate of 816,327 shares of Common Stock in a private placement transaction for an aggregate purchase price of $2.0 million.  Additional information regarding the Stock Purchase Agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby was set forth in a definitive proxy statement filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2011.

On November 30, 2011, the Investors failed to perform their obligations under the Stock Purchase Agreements by, among other things, failing to pay the purchase price described above.  Accordingly, the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreements were never consummated, and the Company sent the Investors a notice of termination of the Stock Purchase Agreements on December 12, 2011.  The Company did not incur any penalties in connection with its termination of the Stock Purchase Agreements.

Completion of $2.0 Million Investment Transaction with Isaac Capital Group LLC and Other Investors

On December 12, 2011, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company approved, and the Company entered into, a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with each of Isaac Capital Group LLC (“ICG”), John Kocmur (“Kocmur”), Kingston Diversified Holdings LLC (“Kingston”), Augustus Gardini, L.P. (“Augustus”) and Lausanne LLC (“Lausanne” and, collectively with ICG, Kocmur, Kingston and Augustus, the “Purchasers” and each a “Purchaser”) providing for the Company’s issuance and sale of an aggregate of 1,612,889 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”), for an aggregate cash purchase price equal to $2.0 million.  Each of ICG, Kocmur and Kingston (the “Lead Purchasers”) invested $500,000 in the Company and were issued 403,225 shares of Common Stock, and each of Augustus and Lausanne invested $250,000 in the Company and were issued 201,612 shares of Common Stock.  The transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement were consummated on December 12, 2011.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, among other things:

·
The per share purchase price ($1.24, which was the closing bid price of the Common Stock, as reported by the NASDAQ Capital Market, on December 12, 2011) for the Shares was equal to the greater of the book or market value of such shares, in accordance with applicable NASDAQ rules.
·
The cash proceeds from the transactions were deposited and will be maintained in a designated account (the “Proceeds Account��), which is subject to certain restrictions pursuant to the New Bylaws (as defined and described below).

·
Each Lead Purchaser was given the right, until the date such Lead Purchaser beneficially owns less than five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding Common Stock, to (i) designate one director (a “New Director” and together, the “New Directors”) prior to the closing to serve on the Board on and after the closing, (ii) nominate one director for election by the Company’s stockholders at each meeting of the stockholders at which directors are to be elected, and (iii) designate a replacement director to fill any vacancy if the director previously designated or nominated by such Lead Purchaser ceases for any reason to be a director.

·
The Company agreed not to take certain Restricted Corporate Actions (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) prior to the completion of its next annual meeting without the approval of both (i) a majority of the Board and (ii) a majority of the New Directors.

·
The Company agreed to form the Restructuring Committee as defined and described below to evaluate a potential restructuring of the Company.

·
The Company made customary representations and warranties to the Purchasers, including (without limitation) with respect to the Company’s organization and qualification, no conflicts, capitalization matters, litigation, labor relations, regulatory permits, title to assets, intellectual property, affiliate transactions, insurance, listing requirements, tax matters, compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, independent accountants, internal controls and lack of undisclosed liabilities.  Such representations and warranties were qualified in several respects by the Company’s disclosures in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, so such representations and warranties should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they speak as of any date subsequent to December 12, 2011.

·
The Purchasers made customary representations and warranties to the Company, including (without limitation) with respect to their status as accredited investors and investment intent pertaining to the Shares.

As previously disclosed, the Company consummated the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement to regain compliance with the requirement that the Company have stockholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million for continued listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market.  As of the date of this filing, the Company believes that its stockholders’ equity exceeds $2.5 million.

In connection with their execution and delivery of the Purchase Agreement, the parties also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) on December 12, 2011, pursuant to which the Company agreed to provide the Purchasers with customary resale and piggy-back registration rights pertaining to the Shares.

50


The Company offered and sold the Shares without registration415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions at market prices on the NASDAQ Capital Market, in block transactions, through privately negotiated transactions, or as otherwise agreed by Chardan and us. Chardan will act as sales agent on a commercially reasonable efforts basis consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations and the rules of NASDAQ.

55

The offering pursuant to a limited number of accredited investors in reliancethe Engagement Agreement will terminate upon the exemptionearlier of (i) the sale of all shares of common stock subject to the Engagement Agreement, or (ii) termination of the Engagement Agreement as permitted therein. The Engagement Agreement may be terminated by Chardan or us at any time upon 15 days’ notice to the other party.

We will pay Chardan a commission equal to up to 3% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the common stock sold through Chardan pursuant to the Engagement Agreement and reimburse Chardan up to $15,000 in expenses. We have also provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the Securities and Exchange CommissionChardan with customary indemnification rights. No assurance can be given that we will sell any shares under the Securities Act.  Engagement Agreement, or, if we do, as to the price or amount of shares that we will sell, or the dates on which any such sales will take place.

The Shares mayforegoing description of the Engagement Agreement contained herein does not purport to be offered or soldcomplete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the United States incomplete text of the absenceEngagement Agreement, a copy of an effectivewhich is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 1.1 and incorporated herein by reference. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also incorporates by reference the Engagement Agreement into our shelf registration statement or exemption fromon Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the registration requirementsSEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Securities Act.  An appropriate legendEngagement Agreement will be placed onsold.

On January 9, 2014, we delivered a placement notice to Chardan to sell 12,200 shares of our common stock as part of the Shares unless registered underat-the-market offering. The shares were sold for approximately $8.93 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $109,000. Net proceeds to us, after payment of Chardan’s 3% commission was approximately $106,000.

Convertible Note Transaction ($5 Million Line of Credit)

On January 7, 2014, the Securities Act priorCompany entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Kingston Diversified Holdings LLC (the “Investor”), pursuant to issuance.


Appointmentwhich the Investor agreed to purchase for cash up to $5,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of Kevin A. Hall to Board of Directors

On December 8, 2011, the Board increasedCompany’s Convertible Notes (“Notes”). The Purchase Agreement and the number of authorized directors ofNotes, which are unsecured, provide that all amounts payable by the Company to five directorsthe Investor under the Notes will be due and appointed Kevin A. Hall,payable on the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, to fill the vacancy created by such increase in the sizesecond (2nd) anniversary of the full Board.  Mr. Hall’s appointment took effect immediately, and he was appointed for a term lasting until the next annual meetingdate of the Company’s stockholders, or until his earlier resignation or removal in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.  The Board does not anticipate that Mr. Hall will be appointed to any standing committees in light of his role as a member of the Company’s executive management team.

Appointment of Jon Isaac, Tony Isaac and John Kocmur to Board of Directors

On December 12, 2011, the Board increased the number of authorized directors of the Company to eight directors and appointed Jon Isaac, Tony Isaac and John Kocmur to fill the vacancies created by such increase in the size of the full Board.  Such New Directors were designated for appointment to the Board by the Lead Purchasers in accordance with their rights under the Purchase Agreement as described above.  Such appointments took effect immediately upon the closing of the transactions contemplated by the(the “Maturity Date”).

The Purchase Agreement and each New Director was appointed for a term lasting until the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders, or until his earlier resignation or removal in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.  The Board has not yet appointed any of the New Directors to serve on its standing committees, although it anticipates making certain appointments in the near future.

Notes provide that:

Either the Company or the Investor will have the right to cause the sale and issuance of Notes pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, provided that NASDAQ’s approval of the Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby is a condition precedent to each party’s right to cause any borrowings to occur under the Purchase Agreement.
Each Note must be in a principal amount of at least $100,000.
The Notes are issuable at a 5% discount and will accrue interest at an annual interest rate equal to 8%. All interest will be payable on the Maturity Date or upon the conversion of the applicable Note.
The Company has the option to prepay each Note, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty.
the Company or the Investor may elect at any time on or before the Maturity Date to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under any Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price applicable to any such conversion will be an amount equal to 70% of the lesser of: (i) the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of the Purchase Agreement (i.e., $9.35 per share); or (ii) the 10-day volume weighted average closing bid price for the common stock, as listed on NASDAQ for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of conversion (the “Average Price”); provided, however, that in no event will the Average Price per share be less than $1.00. For example, if the Average Price is $0.50 per share, then for purposes of calculating the conversion price, the Average Price per share would be $1.00 per share instead of $0.50 per share.
If either party elects to convert all or any portion of any Note, the Company must issue to the Investor on the date of the conversion a warrant (“Contingent Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the number of shares issuable upon conversion. This number of shares is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits or combinations, stock dividends, certainpro rata distributions, and certain fundamental transactions. Each Contingent Warrant will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years following the date of its issuance at an exercise price equal to 110% of the conversion price of the applicable Note (with the exercise price being subject to adjustment under the same conditions as the number of shares for which the warrant is exercisable.) The Contingent Warrants provide that they may be exercised in whole or in part and include a cashless exercise feature.


Formation of Restructuring Committee

In connection with the transactions described above, the Board also established an ad hoc special committee (the “Restructuring Committee”) to evaluate a potential restructuring of the Company.  The Board appointed each of the New Directors, as well as existing directors Sheryle Bolton and Thomas Clarke, to serve on the Restructuring Committee.

Amendment of Bylaws

On December 12, 2011, the Board approved and adopted, effective immediately, Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “New Bylaws”).  In addition to certain technical corrections, the amendments included the following:

56
 

·
PursuantThe Notes provide that, upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, all amounts payable to the Investor will become immediately due and payable without any demand or notice. The events of default (“Events of Default”) which trigger the acceleration of the Notes include (among other things): (i) the Company’s failure to make any payment required under the Notes when due (subject to a three-day cure period), (ii) the Company’s failure to comply with its covenants and agreements under the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and any other transaction documents, and (iii) the occurrence of a change of control with respect to the Company.
The Company (i) is required to provide certain financial and other information to the Investor from time to time, (ii) must maintain its corporate existence, business, assets, properties, insurance and records in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Purchase Agreement, (iii) with certain exceptions, must not incur or suffer to exist any liens or other encumbrances with respect to the Company’s property or assets, (iv) must not make certain loans or investments except in compliance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, and (v) must not enter into certain types of transactions, including dispositions of its assets or business.
The Company agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable, any approvals of the Company’s stockholders required under applicable law or NASDAQ Listing Rules in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement. Unless and until any such stockholder approvals are obtained, in no event will the Investor be entitled to convert any Notes and/or exercise any Contingent Warrants to the extent that any such conversion or exercise would result in the Investor acquiring in such transactions a number of shares of the Company’s common stock exceeding 19.99% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Company’s entry into the Purchase Agreement.
The Investor will be entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price for any Note(s) issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of one or more Notes, the conversion price for such Note(s) will be adjusted downward pursuant to its terms (subject to a floor of $0.70 per share). If any such dilutive issuance occurs after the conversion of one or more Notes, the Investor will be entitled to be issued additional shares of common stock for no consideration, and to an adjustment of the exercise price payable under the applicable Contingent Warrant(s). With respect to each Note actually issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the cash proceedsInvestor’s anti-dilution rights will expire two (2) years following the date of the investment transaction contemplated thereby were deposited in the Proceeds Account.  The New Bylaws provide that until the later of (i) the completion of the next annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and (ii) February 16, 2012 (such later date, the “Termination Date”), no funds may be withdrawn from the Proceeds Account, and no authorized signatory for the Proceeds Account (currently Jon Isaac) may be added, replaced or removed, in either case without such action being approved by both (A) a majority of the Board and (B) a majority of the New Directors.issuance.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and the Contingent Warrants contained herein does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of such documents, copies of which are attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 10.10, 10.11 and 10.12, respectively, and incorporated herein by reference

2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

On January 7, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of distribution equivalent rights, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, performance stock, performance units, restricted ordinary shares, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, tandem stock appreciation rights and unrestricted ordinary shares to our officers, employees, directors, consultants and advisors. The Company has reserved up to 600,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c), the Company intends to seek stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Resignation of Director

On January 9, 2014, John Kocmur informed the Board of Directors of his decision to resign as a director of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Kocmur did not resign because of any disagreement relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.


57
 

·
Note 20:
The New Bylaws provide that, until the Termination Date, the Corporation may not take or agree to take, and the Board may not authorize, approve or ratify, any Restricted Corporate Action (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) without such action being approved by both (A) a majority of the Board and (B) a majority of the New Directors.Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

·
The provisions of Sections 78.378 to 78.3793 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (pertaining to acquisitions of controlling interests in certain covered corporations) shall not apply to the Purchasers.

·
The New Bylaws also provide for certain matters pertaining to the creation of the Restructuring Committee and prevent further amendments or modifications (both to the New Bylaws and the related resolutions of the Board) without such action being approved by both (A) a majority of the Board and (B) a majority of the New Directors.
51

18.SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

Quarterly financial information for 20112013 and 20102012 follows:

  Quarter Ended 
  December 31,  March 31,  June 30,  September 30, 
  2011  2012  2012  2012 
             
Net revenues $851,413  $821,701  $777,857  $619,532 
Gross profit  615,594   595,093   669,196   475,163 
Loss from continuing operations  (195,218)  (259,222)  (289,714)  (843,487)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  3,580   229   7,944   680 
Net loss $(191,638) $(258,993) $(281,770) $(842,807)
                 
Earnings per share information- basic and diluted:                
                 
Loss from continuing operations $(0.18) $(0.11) $(0.12) $(0.36)
Discontinued operations                
Net loss $(0.18)  (0.11) $(0.12) $(0.35)
                 
                 
Weighted Avg common shares outstanding  1,043,960   2,345,253   2,402,168   2,487,911 

  Quarter Ended 
  December 31,  March 31,  June 30,  September 30, 
  2012  2013  2013  2013 
             
Net revenues $572,535  $555,084  $606,867  $617,382 
Gross profit  469,899   438,171   427,946  $99,521 
Loss from continuing operations  (1,062,472)  (3,215,467)  (511,464) $(960,319)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  1,963   450   295  $ 
Net loss $(1,060,509) $(3,215,017) $(511,169) $(960,319)
                 
Earnings per share information- basic and diluted:                
                 
Loss from continuing operations $(0.40) $(1.15) $(0.15) $(0.27)
Discontinued operations                
Net loss $(0.40)  (1.15) $(0.15) $(0.27)
                 
                 
Weighted Avg common shares outstanding  2,653,937   2,793,023   3,437,736   3,570,410 

58

  Quarter Ended 
  December 31,  March 31,  June 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2011  2011  2011 
             
Net revenues $994,622  $1,118,165  $1,124,976  $845,649 
Gross profit  100,045   (394,618)  76,747   695,095 
Loss from continuing operations  (1,884,554)  (2,029,493)  (1,150,938)  (318,908)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  154,160   (285,207)  7,561   5,131 
Net loss $(1,730,394) $(2,314,700) $(1,143,377) $(313,777)
                 
Earnings per share information - basic and diluted:                
                 
Loss from continuing operations $(2.96) $(3.08) $(1.69) $(0.48)
Discontinued operations  0.24   (0.43)  0.01   0.01 
Net loss $(2.72) $(3.51) $(1.68) $(0.47)

  Quarter Ended 
  December 31,  March 31,  June 30,  September 30, 
  2009  2010  2010  2010 
             
Net revenues $1,107,524  $1,101,816  $992,260  $1,037,355 
Gross profit  1,009,175   919,219   817,562   365,029 
Loss from continuing operations  (3,166,836)  (1,997,617)  (1,537,121)  (1,876,435)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations  641,183   224,095   197,187   58,826 
Net loss $(2,525,653) $(1,773,522) $(1,339,934) $(1,817,609)
                 
Earnings per share information - basic and diluted:                
                 
Loss from continuing operations $(5.02) $(3.17) $(2.43) $(2.97)
Discontinued operations  1.02   0.36   0.31   0.09 
Net loss $(4.00) $(2.81) $(2.12) $(2.88)

ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures


None.


ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officerprincipal financial offer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officerprincipal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer,principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2011.2013. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment using those criteria, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2011.


52


2013.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to a permanent exemption of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report. Accordingly, our management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 20112013 has not been audited by our auditors, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.Kabani & Company, or any other independent registered accounting firm.


ITEM 9B. Other Information

Engagement Agreement with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (At-The-Market Offering)

On January 7, 2014, we entered into an Engagement Agreement (the “Engagement Agreement”) with Chardan Capital Markets LLC (“Chardan”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell up to a maximum aggregate amount of 660,000 shares of our common stock from time to time through Chardan as our sales agent, under our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Engagement Agreement will be sold.

Upon delivery of a placement notice by the Company, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Engagement Agreement, Chardan may sell the common stock by any method that is deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions at market prices on the NASDAQ Capital Market, in block transactions, through privately negotiated transactions, or as otherwise agreed by Chardan and us. Chardan will act as sales agent on a commercially reasonable efforts basis consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations and the rules of NASDAQ.

The offering pursuant to the Engagement Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of (i) the sale of all shares of common stock subject to the Engagement Agreement, or (ii) termination of the Engagement Agreement as permitted therein. The Engagement Agreement may be terminated by Chardan or us at any time upon 15 days’ notice to the other party.

We will pay Chardan a commission equal to up to 3% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the common stock sold through Chardan pursuant to the Engagement Agreement and reimburse Chardan up to $15,000 in expenses. We have also provided Chardan with customary indemnification rights. No assurance can be given that we will sell any shares under the Engagement Agreement, or, if we do, as to the price or amount of shares that we will sell, or the dates on which any such sales will take place.

On January 9, 2014, we delivered a placement notice to Chardan to sell 12,200 shares of our common stock as part of the at-the-market offering. The shares were sold for approximately $8.93 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $109,000. Net proceeds to us, after payment of Chardan’s 3% commission was approximately $106,000.

59

The foregoing description of the Engagement Agreement contained herein does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Engagement Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 1.1 and incorporated herein by reference. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also incorporates by reference the Engagement Agreement into our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-187397) previously filed with the SEC, pursuant to which any shares that are issued under the Engagement Agreement will be sold.

Convertible Note Transaction ($5 Million Line of Credit)

On January 7, 2014, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) with Kingston Diversified Holdings LLC (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Investor agreed to purchase for cash up to $5,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Company’s Convertible Notes (“Notes”). The Purchase Agreement and the Notes, which are unsecured, provide that all amounts payable by the Company to the Investor under the Notes will be due and payable on the second (2nd) anniversary of the date of the Purchase Agreement (the “Maturity Date”).

The Purchase Agreement and the Notes provide that:

Either the Company or the Investor will have the right to cause the sale and issuance of Notes pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, provided that NASDAQ’s approval of the Purchase Agreement and transactions contemplated thereby is a condition precedent to each party’s right to cause any borrowings to occur under the Purchase Agreement.
Each Note must be in a principal amount of at least $100,000.
The Notes are issuable at a 5% discount and will accrue interest at an annual interest rate equal to 8%. All interest will be payable on the Maturity Date or upon the conversion of the applicable Note.
The Company has the option to prepay each Note, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty.
Either the Company or the Investor may elect at any time on or before the Maturity Date to convert the principal and accrued but unpaid interest due under any Note into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price applicable to any such conversion will be an amount equal to 70% of the lesser of: (i) the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of the Purchase Agreement (i.e., $9.35 per share); or (ii) the 10-day volume weighted average closing bid price for the common stock, as listed on NASDAQ for the 10 business days immediately preceding the date of conversion (the “Average Price”); provided, however, that in no event will the Average Price per share be less than $1.00. For example, if the Average Price is $0.50 per share, then for purposes of calculating the conversion price, the Average Price per share would be $1.00 per share instead of $0.50 per share.
If either party elects to convert all or any portion of any Note, the Company must issue to the Investor on the date of the conversion a warrant (“Contingent Warrant”) to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the number of shares issuable upon conversion. This number of shares is subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits or combinations, stock dividends, certainpro rata distributions, and certain fundamental transactions. Each Contingent Warrant will be exercisable for a period of five (5) years following the date of its issuance at an exercise price equal to 110% of the conversion price of the applicable Note (with the exercise price being subject to adjustment under the same conditions as the number of shares for which the warrant is exercisable.) The Contingent Warrants provide that they may be exercised in whole or in part and include a cashless exercise feature.
The Notes provide that, upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, all amounts payable to the Investor will become immediately due and payable without any demand or notice. The events of default (“Events of Default”) which trigger the acceleration of the Notes include (among other things): (i) the Company’s failure to make any payment required under the Notes when due (subject to a three-day cure period), (ii) the Company’s failure to comply with its covenants and agreements under the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and any other transaction documents, and (iii) the occurrence of a change of control with respect to the Company.

53
60

The Company (i) is required to provide certain financial and other information to the Investor from time to time, (ii) must maintain its corporate existence, business, assets, properties, insurance and records in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Purchase Agreement, (iii) with certain exceptions, must not incur or suffer to exist any liens or other encumbrances with respect to the Company’s property or assets, (iv) must not make certain loans or investments except in compliance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement, and (v) must not enter into certain types of transactions, including dispositions of its assets or business.
The Company agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable, any approvals of the Company’s stockholders required under applicable law or NASDAQ Listing Rules in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement. Unless and until any such stockholder approvals are obtained, in no event will the Investor be entitled to convert any Notes and/or exercise any Contingent Warrants to the extent that any such conversion or exercise would result in the Investor acquiring in such transactions a number of shares of the Company’s common stock exceeding 19.99% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Company’s entry into the Purchase Agreement.
The Investor will be entitled to certain anti-dilution adjustments if the Company issues shares of its common stock at a lower price per share than the applicable conversion price for any Note(s) issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. If any such dilutive issuance occurs prior to the conversion of one or more Notes, the conversion price for such Note(s) will be adjusted downward pursuant to its terms (subject to a floor of $0.70 per share). If any such dilutive issuance occurs after the conversion of one or more Notes, the Investor will be entitled to be issued additional shares of common stock for no consideration, and to an adjustment of the exercise price payable under the applicable Contingent Warrant(s). With respect to each Note actually issued pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Investor’s anti-dilution rights will expire two (2) years following the date of issuance.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement, the Notes and the Contingent Warrants contained herein does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of such documents, copies of which are attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 10.10, 10.11 and 10.12, respectively, and incorporated herein by reference

2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

On January 7, 2014, our Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of distribution equivalent rights, incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, performance stock, performance units, restricted ordinary shares, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, tandem stock appreciation rights and unrestricted ordinary shares to our officers, employees, directors, consultants and advisors. The Company has reserved up to 600,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2014 Plan. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(c), the Company intends to seek stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan at our 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Resignation of Director

On January 9, 2014, John Kocmur informed the Board of Directors of his decision to resign as a director of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Kocmur did not resign because of any disagreement relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.

Potential Forward Stock Split

On January 8, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with plans for a forward stock split with respect to the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The ratio for the forward stock split would be between 3:1 to 5:1. The forward stock split may be subject to stockholder and/or other approvals, and there is no assurance regarding the timing or ratio at which it will be completed or that it will be completed at all.

61

PART III


Certain

The information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K because wethe required information will filebe incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statementproxy statement for our 20122014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act (the “Proxy Statement”) not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. Certain information included in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance


The information required by this Item will be disclosed in ourthe Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


reference from the Proxy Statement.

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of its officers, directors and employees.


ITEM 11.Executive Compensation


The information required by this Item will be disclosed in ourthe Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


reference from the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


The information required by this Item will be disclosed in ourthe Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


reference from the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence


The information required by this Item will be disclosed in ourthe Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


reference from the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services


The information required by this Item will be disclosed in ourthe Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.reference from the Proxy Statement.

62

PART IV


ITEM 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules


(1)
Financial Statements are listed on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 28 of this Annual Report.
(2)The following represents financial statement schedules required to be filed with this Annual Report:

54


SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON SCHEDULE


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of


LIVEDEAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


We have audited the consolidated financial statements of LiveDeal, Inc. and Subsidiaries(theits subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 and for the years then ended and have issued our report thereon dated December 29, 2011.January 10, 2014. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The information included in the accompanying Schedule II–Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and is not a required part of the basic consolidated financial statements. Such information for the years ended September 30, 20112013 and 20102012 has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.     

Kabani & Company, Inc.

Certified Public Accountants

January 10, 2014

63
/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. 
Phoenix, Arizona
December 29, 2011

SCHEDULE II

  Balance at  Charged to  Charged to      Balance at 
  Beginning  Costs and  Other  
Deductions/
  End of 
Description
 of Period  Expenses  Accounts  Writeoffs  Period 
                
Allowance for dilution and fees on amounts due from billing aggregators          
                
Year ended September 30, 2010 $2,690,895  $(354,989) $   $(231,080) $2,104,826 
                     
Year ended September 30, 2011 $2,104,826  $877,932  $   $(1,504,989) $1,477,769 
                     
Allowance for customer refunds                    
                     
Year ended September 30, 2010 $150,431  $553,214  $   $(656,643) $47,002 
                     
Year ended September 30, 2011 $47,002  $349,463  $   $(250,603) $145,862 

55


Description Balance at
Beginning
of Period
  Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  Charged to
Other
Accounts
  Deductions/
Write-offs
  Balance at
End of
Period
 
                
Allowance for dilution and fees on amounts due from billing aggregators       
                
Year ended September 30, 2012 $1,477,769  $439,672  $  $(392,315) $1,525,126 
                     
Year ended September 30, 2013 $1,525,126  $199,577  $   $(993,926) $730,777 
                     
Allowance for customer refunds                    
                     
Year ended September 30, 2012 $145,862  $493,927  $   $(605,678) $34,111 
                     
Year ended September 30, 2013 $34,111  $133,737  $   $(161,567) $6,281 

(3) The following exhibits are filed with or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

Exhibit

Number

 Description Previously Filed as Exhibit 

Date

Previously

Filed

1.1Engagement Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2014, by and between the Registrant and Chardan Capital Markets LLCFiled herewith  
       
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 15, 2007 8/15/07
       
3.1.1 Certificate of Change Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2010 9/7/10
3.1.2Certificate of CorrectionExhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 11, 20133/11/13
       
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2011 12/15/11
       
10.1* LiveDeal, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan* Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 12/20/07

64
 

10.1.1* First Amendment to Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan* Appendix A to 2009 Proxy Statement 1/29/09
10.1.2*Second Amendment to the LiveDeal, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Plan*Appendix A to 2012 Proxy Statement1/27/12
       
10.2* Form of 2003 Stock Plan Restricted Stock Agreement* Exhibit 10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 5/16/05
       
10.3* Form of 2003 Stock Plan Stock Option Agreement* Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 12/29/08
       
10.4
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2009, by and among the Registrant, Telco Billing, Inc., and Local.com CorporationExhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 20095/15/09
10.5Settlement Agreement and Mutual release, dated as of February 3, 2010 by and among Oncall Superior Management, SM Ventures, LiveDeal, Inc. and Telco Billing, Inc.Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 20105/14/10
10.6*Employment Agreement, dated as of March 24, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Kevin Hall*Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 20115/16/11
10.7Loan Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2011, by and among the Registrant, the other borrowers party thereto, and Everest Group LLC, as lenderExhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 20118/15/11
10.8General Security Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2011, by and among the Registrant, the other debtors party thereto, and Everest Group LLC, as lenderExhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 20118/15/11
10.9*Employment Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2011, by and between the Registrant and Lawrence W. Tomsic*Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 20118/15/11
10.10 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December  12, 2011, by and among the Registrant, and the purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2011 12/15/11
       
10.1110.5 Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2011, by and among the Registrant and the purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 15, 2011 12/15/11

56


10.11.1
10.5.1 Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2011, by and among the Registrant and the purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto Exhibit 10.11.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on December 29, 201112/29/11
10.6Note Purchase Agreement, dated April 3, 2012, by and between the Registrant and Isaac Capital Group LLCExhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 20125/15/12
10.6.1First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, made and entered into as of April 3, 2012, by and between the Registrant and Isaac Capital Group LLCExhibit 10.12.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on January 15, 2013 1/15/13
10.6.2Senior Subordinated Convertible Note (under Note Purchase Agreement)Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 20125/15/12
10.6.3Subordinated Guaranty (under Note Purchase Agreement)Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 20125/15/12
10.6.4Form of Warrant (under Note Purchase Agreement)Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 20125/15/12
10.7Asset Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 2012, by and between the Registrant and LiveOpenly, Inc.Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 20128/14/1
10.8Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2013, by and between the Registrant and Jon Isaac*Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 20135/14/13

65

10.9Asset Purchase Agreement, dated September 9, 2013, by and between the Registrant and Novalk Apps S.A.S.Filed herewith
10.10Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2014, by and between the Registrant and Kingston Diversified Holdings LLCFiled herewith  
10.11Convertible Note (under 2014 Note Purchase Agreement)Filed herewith  
10.12Form of Warrant (under 2014 Note Purchase Agreement)Filed herewith    
       
14 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Adopted December 31, 2003 Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 5/13/04
       
2123 Consent of Kabani & Company, SubsidiariesInc. Filed herewith  
       
2331.1 ConsentCertification of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.Filed herewith
31Certifications pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238, as adoptedthe Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Filed herewith  
       
31.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200Filed herewith
32 CertificationsCertification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350Filed herewith
101†The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as adopted pursuantof September 30, 2013 and 2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and (iv) the Notes to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Consolidated Financial Statements Filed herewith  

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement


† Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

66
57


SIGNATURES


In accordance with

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Dated:  December 29, 2011
Dated:  January 10, 2014
/s/Kevin A. Hall Jon Isaac
 Kevin A. HallJon Isaac
 President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive, Officerand Financial Officer))
  
Dated:  December 29, 2011/s/ Lawrence Tomsic
 Lawrence W. Tomsic
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

BOARD OF DIRECTORS


Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Richard D. Butler Director December 29, 2011January 10, 2014
Richard D. Butler    
     
/s/ Sheryle BoltonDennis Gao Director December 29, 2011January 10, 2014
Sheryle BoltonDennis Gao    
     
/s/ Thomas Clarke, Jr.Jon Isaac Director December 29, 2011
Thomas Clarke, Jr
/s/ Kevin A. HallDirectorDecember 29, 2011
Kevin A. Hall
/s/ Jon IsaacDirectorDecember 29, 2011January 10, 2014
Jon Isaac    
     
/s/ Tony Isaac Director December 29, 2011January 10, 2014
Tony Isaac    
     
/s/ John KocmurGreg LeClaire Director December 29, 2011January 10, 2014
John KocmurGreg LeClaire    
     
/s/ Greg LeClaire Director December 29, 2011
Greg LeClaire    

67

58