UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

or

For the Transition Period from              to             .

Commission file number 000-54376

TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(949) 798-6201

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Securities Exchange Act of 1934:  

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x¨    No  ¨x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

There is no established trading market for the registrant’s common stock and therefore the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates cannot be determined. There were approximately 10,430,623 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates at June 29, 2012, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of March 22, 2013, there were 10,969,714 outstanding shares of common stock of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference (solely to the extent explicitly indicated) from the TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

TNP STRATEGIC RETAIL TRUST, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statementsEXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING THIS FORM 10-K/A

On April 1, 2013, TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Original Form 10-K”). In accordance with Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the Original Form 10-K incorporated by reference, from the Company’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, the information required by Part III of Form 10-K. This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (“Amendment No. 1”) is being filed solely to amend the Original Form 10-K to set forth the information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of Form 10-K, as required by Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, due to the fact that the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders will not be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

The information included in this annual report onAmendment No. 1 has not been updated to reflect other events occurring after the filing of the Original Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”) that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance,to modify or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements withinupdate those disclosures in the meaning of Section 27AOriginal Form 10-K affected by subsequent events. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K. In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SecuritiesSEC, this Amendment No. 1 contains currently-dated certifications from the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 1933,2002.

PART III

ITEM 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors

Our current directors and executive officers and their respective ages and positions are listed below:

Anthony W. Thompsonhas served as amended,the chairman of our board of directors since September 2008, as our Co-Chief Executive Officer since November 2012 and as our President since February 2012. Mr. Thompson served as our Chief Executive Officer from September 2008 to November 2012. Mr. Thompson also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Thompson National Properties, LLC (our “sponsor” or “TNP LLC”), TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, our “advisor,” and TNP Securities, LLC (“TNP Securities”) the dealer manager for our initial public offering. Prior to founding TNP LLC in 2008, Mr. Thompson founded Triple Net Properties, LLC (“Triple Net”), in 1998 and served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until 2006, when he was named Chairman of the Board for NNN Realty Advisors, Inc.(“Realty Advisors”) the holding company for Triple Net. In December 2007, Realty Advisors merged with Grubb & Ellis Company and Mr. Thompson was named Chairman of the combined company, a position from which he resigned effective February 8, 2008. During his tenure, Mr. Thompson oversaw operations of two non-listed REITS sponsored by these companies, NNN Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc. (now Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.) and NNN Apartment REIT, Inc. (now Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT, Inc.) which at the time of his departure had acquired in excess of $600 million in commercial real estate properties. Mr. Thompson’s responsibilities included participating in (1) the oversight of day-to-day operations of the non-listed REITs, (2) the selection of real property and real estate related securities acquisitions and dispositions, (3) the structuring and negotiating of the terms of asset acquisitions and dispositions, (4) the selection of joint venture partners and monitoring these relationships, and (5) the oversight of the property managers, including the review and analysis of the operating budgets and leasing plans. Mr. Thompson is a member of the Sterling College Board of Trustees and various other community and charitable organizations. Mr. Thompson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Sterling College in Sterling, Kansas. Mr. Thompson is a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Series 1 and 24 registered representative of TNP Securities.

Our board of directors, excluding Mr. Thompson, has determined that Mr. Thompson is qualified to serve as one of our directors due to his extensive experience overseeing similar non-listed REITs, including the selection, negotiation, and management of investments in real estate and real estate related properties, as well as his status as a FINRA Series 1 and 24 registered representative.

K. Timothy O’Brien has served as our Co-Chief Executive Officer since November 2012. Mr. O’Brien has served as the Executive Vice President, Real Estate of TNP LLC, our sponsor, since June 2011. His roles at TNP LLC have included positioning and managing the sale of investment parcels in the Company’s portfolio, acquiring and selling single tenant properties under its Delaware Statutory Trust program and related corporate real estate functions. Mr. O’Brien was a founding shareholder of TNP LLC and has served on its Advisory Committee since 2008. Mr. O’Brien was a founding shareholder of Triple Net Properties, Inc. (“NNN”) in 1998 and served on its Advisory Committee. Mr. O’Brien served on the board of directors of one of the NNN real estate investment trust programs, A REIT, until NNN elected not to consummate its registration. Prior to NNN, Mr. O’Brien was the Co-founder and Executive Vice President of Econo Lube N’ Tune, Inc., from 1977 to 2006, a national specialty automotive service franchise company with over three hundred franchised and company centers. He ran the real estate development, finance and franchising arm of Econo Lube N’ Tune, Inc., financed its new store development through a number of credit facilities including two public real estate investment trusts. Prior to Econo Lube N’ Tune, Inc., Mr. O’Brien held several real estate development industry positions, notably Director of Operations at the 95,000 acre Rancho California master-planned community in Riverside, California from 1970 to 1972. Mr. O’Brien has been a member of the Board of Trustees of Sterling College since 2000 and currently serves as its co-chair. Mr. O’Brien holds a Masters of Business Administration from the University of California, Los Angeles and Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Dee R. Balch has served as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary since August 2012 and as a member of our board of directors since July 2012. Ms. Balch is a Certified Public Accountant with more than 20 years of accounting, reporting and real estate experience. Prior to joiningTNP LLC in April 2012, Ms. Balch served from January 2010 to February 2012 as Senior Vice President, Finance and Accounting for Buchanan Street Partners, a real estate investment management company. Ms. Balch’s career also includes 14 years with Ernst and Young LLP, a major international public accounting firm, from 1996 to 2010 with her last position there as Executive Director overseeing the assurance practice. Ms. Balch’s past experience also includes serving as the internal auditor for Florida Power & Light Company, a large publicly-traded Florida utility company, as a senior auditor for KPMG Peat Marwick, and as a financial analyst for Citicorp Savings based in Miami, Florida. Ms. Balch earned a Bachelor of Science in Systems Analysis and a Master of Business of Administration from the University of Miami. Additionally, Ms. Balch holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Florida Atlantic University. Ms. Balch is a Certified Public Accountant with an active license in California and Florida, and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the California Society of CPAs.

Our board of directors, excluding Ms. Balch, has determined that Ms. Balch is qualified to serve as one of our directors due to her experience serving as a Chief Financial Officer and her over20 years of real estate, accounting and SEC reporting experience.

John B. Maier II, has served as one of our independent directors since October 2012. Mr. Maier is Head of Investment Banking at Headwaters|MB LLC. He joined Headwaters when Headwaters acquired Legacy Ptrs. & Co, LLC, an investment bank focused on the middle market. Prior to re-forming Legacy in 2010, Mr. Maier was Co-Head of Mergers and Acquisitions and Financial Sponsors at FBR Capital Markets, where he was part of the successful 144A offering of Triple Net. He joined FBR in 2007 when FBR acquired Legacy Partners Group, LLC founded by Mr. Maier in 2003. Prior to launching Legacy, Mr. Maier was Global Co-Head of Middle Market M&A at Credit Suisse First Boston. He joined Credit Suisse when it acquired Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (“DLJ”) where Mr. Maier was a partner. At DLJ he helped build and then led the firm’s Exclusive Sales Group, which became one of the most successful middle market sell-side advisory practices on Wall Street. Prior to joining DLJ, Mr. Maier was with Wasserstein Perella & Co. in their Los Angeles office, where he launched that firm’s Global Logistics and Outsourcing Practice. He subsequently helped start Wasserstein’s San Francisco banking effort and its West Coast Technology Practice. Mr. Maier graduated from Wake Forest University. He received his MBA with the distinction University Fellow from Georgetown University.

Our board of directors, excluding Mr. Maier, has determined that Mr. Maier is qualified to serve as one of our directors due to his experience as an officer of various investment banking firms.

Phillip I. Levinhas served as one of our independent directors since April 2011. Mr. Levin has served since 1991 as President of Levin Development Company, a real estate development and consulting firm. Prior to founding Levin Development Company in 1991, Mr. Levin served for approximately 16 years with Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P. (now PricewaterhouseCoopers), where he became the Managing Partner of the firm’s consulting practice in Michigan. From 1970 to 1974, Mr. Levin served as Manager of the Consulting Services Division of Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young) in Toledo, Ohio.Prior to joining Arthur Young & Company, Mr. Levin served as a Financial Analyst for Ford Motor Company for approximately 8 years. Mr. Levin holds a Master of Business Administration in Finance and a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Pittsburgh.

Our board of directors, excluding Mr. Levin, has determined that Mr. Levin is qualified to serve as one of our directors due to his experience as an officer of a real estate development and consulting firm and his professional experience as a certified public accountant. In addition, our board of directors believes that Mr. Levin is qualified to serve as the financial expert and chairperson of the Audit Committee due to his extensive experience as a certified public accountant.

Jeffrey S. Rogershas served as one of our independent directors since March 2009. Mr. Rogers is currently the head of Zazma, Inc., an online payment services company. Prior to joining Zazma, Mr. Rogers served as President, and Chief Operating Officer from February 2005 until September 2012 and as Chief Operating Officer between February 2004 and February 2005 of Integra Realty Resources, Inc., a commercial real estate valuation and counseling firm, where he oversaw corporate operations, technology and software initiatives, and all aspects of financial reporting and audit procedures. Prior to joining Integra Realty Resources, Inc. in February 2004, Mr. Rogers worked from November 2002 to February 2004 as a consultant for Regeneration, LLC, a management consulting firm. Between September 1999 and November 2002, Mr. Rogers held various positions at ReturnBuy, Inc., a technology and software solutions company, including President of ReturnBuy Ventures, a division of ReturnBuy, Inc., between August 2001 and November 2002, Chief Financial Officer between September 1999 and August 2001 and member of the Board of Directors between September 1999 and August 2001. In January 2003, ReturnBuy, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy as part of a restructuring transaction in which it was acquired by Jabil Circuit, Inc. Mr. Rogers currently serves on the board of directors of Presidential Realty Corp., a public REIT. Mr. Rogers has also served on the Finance Committee of the Young Presidents Organization since March 2009 and as Audit Committee Chairman from July 2010 to July 2012. Mr. Rogers earned a Master of Business Administration degree from The Darden School, University of Virginia in Charlottesville, Virginia, a Juris Doctorate degree from Washington and Lee University School of Law in Lexington, Virginia and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from the Washington and Lee University.

Our board of directors, excluding Mr. Rogers, has determined that Mr. Rogers is qualified to serve as one of our directors due to his previous leadership position with a commercial real estate valuation and counseling firm and his professional experience as an attorney. In addition, our board of directors believes that Mr. Rogers is qualified to serve as a member of the Audit Committee due to his extensive experience with financial reporting as a former Chief Financial Officer.

Section 21E16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or(the “Exchange Act”) requires our investmentsdirectors and resultsexecutive officers, and any persons beneficially owning more than 10% of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified byour outstanding shares of common stock, to file with the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgmentsSEC reports with respect to among other things, future economic, competitivetheir initial ownership of our common stock and market conditionsreports of changes in their ownership of our common stock. As a matter of practice, our administrative staff and future business decisions, alloutside counsel assists our directors and executive officers in preparing these reports, and typically file those reports on behalf of which are difficult or impossible to predict accuratelyour directors and manyexecutive officers. Based solely on a review of which are beyondthe copies of such forms filed with the SEC during fiscal year 2012 and on written representations from our control. Althoughdirectors and executive officers, we believe that during fiscal year 2012 all of our directors and executive officers filed the expectations reflectedrequired reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a), except as follows:

In 2012, no person held more than 10% of our actual resultsoutstanding shares of common stock.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and performance could differ materially from those set forthEthics, or the Code of Ethics, which contains general guidelines for conducting our business and is designed to help directors, employees and independent consultants resolve ethical issues in an increasingly complex business environment. The Code of Ethics applies to all of our officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and persons performing similar functions and all members of our board of directors. The Code of Ethics covers topics including, but not limited to, conflicts of interest, record keeping and reporting, payments to foreign and U.S. government personnel and compliance with laws, rules and regulations. We will provide to any person without charge a copy of our Code of Ethics, including any amendments or waivers thereto, upon written request delivered to our principal executive office at the forward-looking statements. The following are someaddress listed on the cover page of this amendment to our annual report.

Audit Committee

Our board of directors has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the risksExchange Act. The Audit Committee meets on a regular basis, at least quarterly and uncertainties, although not allmore frequently as necessary. The Audit Committee’s primary function is to assist our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information to be provided to the stockholders and others, the system of internal controls which management has established and the audit and financial reporting process. The current members of the risksAudit Committee are Phillip I. Levin, Jeffrey S. Rogers and uncertainties, that couldJohn B. Maier II, each of whom is an independent director. Mr. Levin is the designated Audit Committee financial expert and the chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, which was adopted by our board of directors on April 14, 2009.

Special Committee

Our board of directors has established a Special Committee comprised of our three independent directors. The Special Committee has the maximum power delegable to a committee of our board of directors under Maryland law and has the authority to (1) engage its own financial and legal advisors, (2) execute, deliver and file or to cause our actual results to differ materially from those presentedbe executed, delivered and filed all agreements, documents and instruments in our forward-looking statements:name and on our behalf as the special committee may deem necessary, convenient or appropriate, (3) expend money on our behalf, and (4) to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, keep private from our board of directors and our officers the minutes of its meetings and other matters.

ITEM 11.Executive Compensation

Executive Officer Compensation

Historically, none of our executive officers have been employed by us or received any compensation from us in exchange for their service as our executive officers. However, effective August 29, 2012, Peter K. Kompaniez resigned from his position as a member of our board of directors and was appointed as our Co-Chief Executive Officer in a consulting capacity. Mr. Kompaniez received compensation from us for performing his duties as an executive officer until he resigned his position effective October 9, 2012.

In addition, effective November 3, 2012, we entered into an employment arrangement with Dee R. Balch as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Prior to this time, beginning on August 15, 2012, Ms. Balch was employed by our advisor and was not compensated by us for serving as our Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Balch receives an annual base salary of $190,000. As discussed below, Ms. Balch is also eligible to receive a retention bonus and an individual performance bonus based upon her service through April 30, 2013. Ms. Balch’s employment is at will and she is not entitled to any severance or other special payments or benefits in the event of her termination or a change in control of our company.

We did not employ or pay compensation to any other of our executive officers in 2012.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation paid to our Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Executive Officer for the year ended December 31, 2012. We had no employees and paid no compensation to any of our executive officers during any prior year.

All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included herein could be inaccurate, and undue reliance should not be placed upon on any forward-looking statements included herein. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Annual Report, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed herein will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made after the date of this Annual Report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward looking statements included in this Annual Report, including, without limitation, the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Annual Report will be achieved.

PART IDirector Compensation

ITEM 1. BUSINESSIf a director is also one of our executive officers or an affiliate of our advisor, we do not pay any compensation to that person for services rendered to us as a director. The amount and form of compensation payable to our independent directors for their service to us is determined by our board of directors, based upon recommendations from our advisor.

OverviewThe following table sets forth the compensation paid to our directors in 2012:

Cash Compensation

TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. isWe pay our independent directors an annual fee of $30,000, plus $2,500 per in-person board meeting attended, $2,000 per in-person committee meeting attended (excluding in-person meetings of the Special Committee, as discussed below), and $1,000 for each telephonic board meeting attended. The Audit Committee and the Special Committee Chairperson receive an additional $10,000 annual retainer. Each member of the Special Committee also receives (1) $1,000 per telephonic meeting of less than one hour in which they participate (2) $1,500 per telephonic meeting of an hour or more in duration in which they participate, and (3) $2,500 per in-person meeting which they attend. The Special Committee will receive the foregoing fees in addition to any fees to which they may be entitled associated with meetings of the full board of directors. If directors attend more than one meeting on any day, we will pay such person a Maryland corporation formedmaximum of $2,500 for all board and committee meetings attended on September 18, 2008 to investsuch day.

We reimburse our independent directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in and manage a portfolio of income producing retail properties, located primarily in the Western United States, and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. connection with attending board meetings.

Equity Plan Compensation

We have electedreserved 2,000,000 shares of common stock for stock grants pursuant to be taxed as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc., and, as required by context, TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership,our long-term incentive plan, which we refer to as the “incentive plan.” We have approved and adopted an independent directors’ compensation plan, which operates as a sub-plan of our “operating partnership,”incentive plan. Under the independent directors’ compensation plan and subject to their respective subsidiaries. Referencessuch plan’s conditions and restrictions, each independent director that joins our board of directors will receive an initial grant of 5,000 shares of restricted common stock on the date he or she joins the board of directors. In addition, on the date of each of our annual stockholders meetings at which an independent director is re-elected to “shares” and “our common stock” referthe board of directors, he or she will receive 2,500 shares of restricted stock. Pursuant to our independent directors’ compensation plan, one-third of the shares of restricted stock become non-forfeitable on the date of grant and one-third become non-forfeitable on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant. The restricted stock will become fully non-forfeitable in the event of an independent director’s termination of service due to his or her death or disability, or upon the occurrence of a change in our control. On July 18, 2012, we granted 2,500 shares of restricted common stock to each of our three independent directors pursuant to our independent directors’ compensation plan in connection with their reelection to our board of directors, resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 7,500 shares of restricted common stock. We own substantially allOn October 2, 2012, we granted 5,000 shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Maier pursuant to our assets and conduct our operations through our operating partnership, of which we are the sole general partner.independent directors’ compensation plan in connection with his appointment as an independent director.

On November 4, 2008, we filedAugust 29, 2012, upon the appointment of Mr. Kompaniez as our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Kompaniez’s resignation from our board of directors, our board of directors amended the terms of the restricted stock previously granted to Mr. Kompaniez pursuant to the independent directors’ compensation plan such that the unvested shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Kompaniez were not forfeited upon his resignation as a registration statement on Form S-11 withdirector and continued to vest pursuant to the Securitiesterms of the plan. Effective October 9, 2012, Mr. Kompaniez resigned from his position as our Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Exchange Commission,the remainder of his unvested shares of restricted stock fully vested as of that date.

ITEM 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under our incentive award plan, as of December 31, 2012.

Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 25, 2013 for each person or SEC,group that holds more than 5% of our common stock, for each of our current directors and executive officers and for our initial public offeringcurrent directors and executive officers as a group. To our knowledge, each person that beneficially owns our shares has sole voting and disposition power with regard to such shares.

Unless otherwise indicated below, each person or entity has an address in care of upour principal executive offices at 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1100, Newport Beach, California 92660.

ITEM 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

The following describes all transactions during the period from January 1, 2011 to $1,000,000,000December 31, 2012 involving us, our directors, our advisor, our sponsor and any affiliate thereof in which more than $120,000 was or will be involved and in which such related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest and all such proposed transactions. Our independent directors are specifically charged with and have examined the fairness of such transactions to our stockholders, and have determined that all such transactions are fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions not less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.

Ownership Interests

On October 16, 2008, our sponsor, TNP LLC purchased 22,222 shares of our common stock to the public at $10.00 per share in our primary offeringfor an aggregate purchase price of $200,000 and up to $100,000,000 shares of our common stock to our stockholders at $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. On August 7, 2009, the SEC declared our registration statement effective and we commencedwas admitted as our initial public offering. On February 7, 2013, we terminatedstockholder.In connection with our initial public offeringacquisition of the Waianae Mall onMay 28, 2010, Anthony W. Thompson, our current Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and ceased offeringPresident, acquired 111,111 shares of our common stock in our primarypublic offering and underat $9.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000,000 through our distribution reinvestment plan. Assponsor. Mr. Thompson’s acquisition of December 31, 2012, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,893,227the shares of our common stock in our initial public offering (net of share redemptions), including 365,242 shareswas a condition to the final approval by the servicer of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in gross offering proceedsassumption of $107,609,000. From the commencementexisting indebtedness on the Waianae Mall. See also “Security Ownership of our initial public offering through the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we accepted subscriptions for,Certain Beneficial Owners and issued, 10,969,714 shares of our common stock (net of share redemptions), including 391,182 shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in aggregate gross offering proceeds of $108,357,000. TNP Securities, LLC, an affiliate of our advisor, served as dealer manager for our initial public offering. We refer to TNP Securities, LLC as “TNP Securities” or our “dealer manager.Management.”

As of December 31, 2012, we had redeemed 160,409 shares pursuant toowned 96.2% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in our share redemption program for an aggregate redemption amountoperating partnership, TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, L.P., (our “OP”), and our advisor owned 0.02% of approximately $1,604,000. Due to short-term liquidity issues and defaults under certainthe outstanding limited partnership interest in our OP. As of December 31, 2012, TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC (“TNP OP Holdings”) owned 100% of the special units issued by our OP. We are the sole general partner of our loan agreements, we suspended our share redemption program, including with respect to redemptions upon death and disability, effective as of January 15, 2013. For more information regarding our share redemption program, see Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer of Equity Securities—Share Redemption Program.”OP.

On June 15, 2012, we filedTNP OP Holdings’ ownership interest of the special units entitles it to a registration statement on Form S-11 withsubordinated participation and it will be entitled to receive (1) 15% of specified distributions made upon the SEC to registerdisposition of our OP’s assets, and (2) a following-on public offeringone-time payment, in the form of up to $900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. However, we subsequently determined not to proceedstock or a promissory note, in conjunction with the redemption of the special units upon the occurrence of certain liquidity events or upon the occurrence of certain events that result in a termination or non-renewal of our advisory agreement with our contemplated follow-on public offering andadvisor, (the “Advisory Agreement”), but in each case only after the other holders of our OP’s units, including us, have received (or have been deemed to have received), in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on March 1, 2013 we requested thattheir net contributions. As the SEC withdraw the registration statement for our contemplated follow-on public offering, effective immediately. We currently doholder of special units, TNP OP Holdings will not expectbe entitled to commence a follow-on offering.receive any other distributions.

SubjectWe have not paid any distributions to certain restrictionsTNP OP Holdings pursuant to its subordinated participation interest.

Our Relationships with our Advisor and limitations, our business is currently managed by Sponsor

TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC our external advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement. We refer to TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLCwas formed in September 2008 and has served as our “advisor.”advisor since our inception. Our advisor is indirectly owned by our sponsor, and TNP Property Manager, LLC, which we refer toMr. Thompson, our current Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President, serves as our “property manager,” manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. Our advisor and property manager are affiliatesthe Chief Executive Officer of our sponsor Thompson National Properties, LLC. Our advisor and property manager depend on the capital from our sponsoradvisor. Dee R. Balch, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and feesSecretary and other compensation that they receive from us in connection with the purchase, management and salea member of our assets to conduct their operations.

Our sponsor has a limited operating history and, since its inception, has operated at a significant net loss. In addition, our sponsor and its subsidiaries also have substantial secured and unsecured debt obligations coming due in the next several years. As a result of our sponsor’s financial condition, our board of directors, is actively negotiatingwas previously employed by our sponsor and advisor. In November 2012, Ms. Balch’s employment with our sponsor and advisor was terminated and she became our employee. Subject to the oversight by our board of directors, our advisor currently provides certain limited services to us pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, including services related to the management of the daily operations of our investment portfolio and certain general and administrative responsibilities. The current Advisory Agreement, as amended, has a one-year term expiring August 7, 2013, subject to an unlimited number of successive one-year renewals upon mutual consent of the parties. We may terminate the Advisory Agreement without cause or penalty upon 60 days written notice to our advisor and immediately upon the fraud, criminal conduct, willful misconduct or gross negligence of our advisor, the material breach of the advisory agreement by our advisor or our advisor’s bankruptcy. If we terminate the Advisory Agreement, we will pay our advisor all unpaid advances for operating expenses and all earned but unpaid fees.

We are currently engaged in negotiations to replace our current advisor with Glenborough, LLC and its affiliates, which we refer to as herein as “Glenborough,“Glenborough.” to replace our current advisor. Glenborough is a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of high quality commercial properties. Glenborough and its predecessor entities have over three decades of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Our board of directors is engaged in ongoing negotiations regarding the transition to Glenborough as our external advisor and the termination of our current advisory agreement and the property management agreements with respect to our properties. However, any change to our advisor or our property manager will require the consent of a number of our significant lenders, which we are still in the process of negotiating. We can give no assurance that we will be able to secure such lender consents or come to terms with Glenborough with respect to the transition. In December 2012, we entered into a consulting agreement with Glenborough to assist us through the advisor change process. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, we pay Glenborough a monthly consulting fee of $75,000 and reimburse Glenborough for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The consulting agreement is terminable by either party upon 10 business days’ written notice.

Our office is located at 4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1100, Newport Beach, California 92660, and our main telephone number is (949) 798-6201.

Investment Objectives

Our investment objectives are to:

Business Strategy

On February 7, 2013, as a result of the expiration of our initial public offering, we ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan. Additionally, on March 1, 2013, we filed an application with the SEC to withdraw our registration statement on Form S-11 for our contemplated follow-on public offering of our common stock. Prior to the termination of our initial public offering, we funded our investments in real properties and other real-estate related assets primarily with the proceeds from our initial public offering and debt financing. Following the termination of our initial public offering, we intend to fund our future cash needs, including any future investments, with debt financing, cash from operations, proceeds to us from asset sales and the proceeds from any offerings of our securities we conduct in the future. As a result of the termination of our public offering and the resulting decrease in our capital resources, we expect our investment activity to be reduced until we are able to engage in an offering of our securities or are able to identify other significant sources of financing.

To the extent we acquire additional real estate investments in the future, we intend to continue to focus on investments in income-producing retail properties, primarily located in large metropolitan areas in the Western United States, including neighborhood, community, power and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties, with a focus on properties located in or near residential areas that have, or have the ability to attract, strong anchor tenants. In addition to direct investments in retail properties, we also may originate or acquire real estate-related loans that meet our underlying criteria for direct investment. The specific number and mix of real estate-related loans in which we invest will depend upon real estate market conditions, particularly with respect to retail properties, other circumstances existing at the time we are investing, and compliance with the terms of certain agreements, including, without limitation, our revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, which contains certain restrictions on our investments. We may also invest in other real estate assets or real estate related assets that we believe meet our investment objectives.

Investment Portfolio

As of December 31, 2012, our portfolio included the 21 properties listed below (20 real estate investments and one property held for sale at December 31, 2012), which we refer to as “our properties” or “our portfolio,” comprising an aggregate of approximately 2,210,000 square feet of single and multi-tenant commercial retail space located in 14 states, which we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $289,686,000.

(1) The Waianae Mall property was sold to an unaffiliated buyer on January 22, 2013.

See Item 2, “Properties” for additional information on our portfolio.

Borrowing Policies

We use, and may continue to use in the future, secured and unsecured debt as a means of providing additional funds for the acquisition of real property, real estate-related loans, and other real estate related assets. Our long-term targeted property portfolio debt level is 50% of the fair market value of our assets. We have borrowed in the past, and may borrow in the future, in excess of our long-term targeted debt level. Our use of leverage increases the risk of default on loan payments and the resulting foreclosure on a particular asset. In addition, lenders may have recourse to assets other than those specifically securing the repayment of our indebtedness. If we do not obtain loans on our properties, however, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted. As of December 31, 2012, our aggregate outstanding indebtedness totaled approximately $210,148,000 (including debt related to Waianae Mall which is classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2012),or 69.7% of the book value of our total assets.

Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, are reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. Under our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended, which we refer to as our “charter,” we are prohibited from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets. Net assets for purposes of this calculation is defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. The preceding calculation is generally expected to approximate 75% of the aggregate cost of our assets before non-cash reserves and depreciation. However, we may temporarily borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with an explanation for such excess.As of December 31, 2012, our borrowings exceeded 300% of the value of our net assets due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were acquired with the acquisition of our properties. Because these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and because our overall indebtedness was less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2012, the excess over the borrowing limitation has been approved by our independent directors. As of December 31, 2011, our borrowings exceeded the 300% limit due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were acquired with the acquisition of our properties. Because these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and because our overall indebtedness was less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2011, this excess borrowing has been approved by our independent directors.

Our advisor uses its best efforts to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us and will seek to refinance assets during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of any such refinancing may include increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing and an increase in diversification and assets owned if all or a portion of the refinancing proceeds are reinvested.

Our charter restricts us from obtaining loans from any of our directors, our advisor and any of our affiliates unless such loan is approved by a majority of our directors, including a majority of the independent directors, not otherwise interested in the transaction as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to us than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.

On January 14, 2013, we received a letter of default from DOF IV REIT Holdings, LLC, or DOF, in connection with the Guaranty of Recourse Obligations dated as of November 9, 2012 by us and Anthony W. Thompson, our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, for the benefit of DOF, pursuant to which we and Mr. Thompson guaranteed the obligations of TNP SRT Lahaina Gateway, LLC, or TNP SRT Lahaina, an indirect subsidiary of our operating partnership, under the loan from DOF to TNP SRT Lahaina in the aggregate principal amount of $29,000,000, which we refer to as the “Lahaina loan.” The letter of default from DOF stated that two events of default existed under the Lahaina loan as a result of the failure of TNP SRT Lahaina to (1) pay a deposit into a rollover account, and (2) pay two mandatory principal payments. DOF requested payment of the missed deposit into the rollover account, the two overdue mandatory principal payments, and late payment charges and default interest in the aggregate amount of $1,280,516 by January 18, 2013. On January 22, 2013, we used a portion of the proceeds from our sale of the Waianae Mall in Waianae, Hawaii to pay the entire amount requested by DOF, which we believe cured the events of default under the Lahaina loan.

In January 2013, we became aware of a number of events of default underthe KeyBank credit facility relating to our failure to use the net proceeds from our sale of our shares in our public offering and the sale of our assets to repay our borrowings under the KeyBank credit facility and our failure to satisfy certain financial covenants under the KeyBank credit facility, which we collectively refer to as the “existing events of default.” Due to the existing events of default, which have not been cured or waived by KeyBank or the other lenders, KeyBank and the other lenders became entitled to exercise all of their rights and remedies under the KeyBank credit facility and applicable law. We, our operating partnership, certain subsidiaries of our operating partnership which are borrowers under the KeyBank credit facility and KeyBank are in the process of finalizing a forbearance agreement which will amend the terms of the KeyBank credit facility and provide for certain additional agreements with respect to the existing events of default. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 7 (Notes Payable) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information on the terms of the forbearance agreement and our outstanding indebtedness.

Economic Dependency

Our advisor and its affiliates currently provide certain services to us pursuant to the advisory agreement and the property management agreements with respect to our properties, including services related to the management of the daily operations of our investment portfolio and certain general and administrative responsibilities. These services are currently relatively limited due to the fact that we are not currently actively engaged in acquisitions and we have hired a number of employees of our own. As disclosed above, we are currently engaged in negotiations to replace our advisor with Glenborough. In the event that we are successful in transitioning to Glenborough as our external advisor and property manager, we will become dependent upon Glenborough and its affiliates to provide similaradvisory and property management services to us pursuant to an advisory agreement and property management agreements. In the event that our advisor, or Glenborough or any other successor advisor, is unable to provide the respectivesuch services to us, we will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Competitive Market Factors

Fees and Expense Reimbursements Paid to our Advisor

To the extent that we acquire additional real estate investments in the future, we will be subject to significant competition in seeking real estate investments and tenants. We compete with many third parties engaged in real estate investment activities, including other REITs, other real estate limited partnerships, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, lenders, hedge funds, governmental bodies, and other entities. Some of our competitors may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have and may have substantially more operating experience than us. Additionally, since 2009, disruptions and dislocations in the credit markets materially impacted the cost and availability of debt to finance real estate acquisitions. More recently, debt financing has become easier to obtain. However, there is no guarantee this trend will continue or that we will be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. Lack of available financing could result in a further reduction of suitable investment opportunities and create a competitive advantage for other entities that have greater financial resources than we do.

Tax Status

We elected to be taxed as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. We believe we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on our taxable income that is currently distributed to our stockholders, provided that distributions to our stockholders equal at least 90% of our taxable income, subject to certain adjustments. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year without the benefit of certain relief provisions, we will be subject to federal income taxes on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates. We may also be subject to certain state or local income taxes, or franchise taxes.

Environmental Matters

All real property investments and the operations conducted in connection with such investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations, relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on a real property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such real property as collateral for future borrowings. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which real property may be used or businesses may be operated. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures or may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our real properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our real properties. There are also various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of real properties, we may be exposed to such costs in connection with such regulations. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of any damages or fines we must pay, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated real property could materially and adversely affect our business, lower the value of our assets or results of operations and, consequently, lower the amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.

We do not believe that compliance with existing environmental laws will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on properties in which we hold an interest, or on properties that may be acquired directly or indirectly in the future.

Employees

As of December 31, 2012, we hadsixemployees, all of whom are former employees of our advisor. Effective November 3, 2012, we entered into an employment arrangement with Dee R. Balch, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Prior to November 3, 2012, Ms. Balch was employed by our advisor and compensated by our advisor for her services as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary.

In addition, certain employees of our advisor or its affiliates provide acquisition, advisory and certain administrative services for us.

Financial Information About Segments

Our current business consists of owning, managing, operating, leasing, acquiring, developing, investing in, and disposing of real estate assets. We internally evaluate all of our real estate assets as one industry segment, and, accordingly, we do not report segment information.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and, as a result, file our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains our annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information we file electronically with the SEC. Access to these filings is free of charge on the SEC’s website as well as on our website (www.tnpsrtreit.com).

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following are some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face but do represent those risks and uncertainties that we believe are material to us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also harm our business.

We may be forced to find another advisor or property manager (or become self-managed) if the financial health of our sponsor does not improve significantly. Even if we could find substitute service providers or become self-managed, such changes would disrupt our business and could cause the value of your investment in us to decline.

TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, our advisor, and TNP Property Manager, LLC, our property manager, assist us in managing our operations and our portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. Our advisor and property manager depend on the capital from our sponsor and fees and other compensation that they receive from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of assets to conduct their operations. Our sponsor has a limited operating history and, since inception, has operated at a significant net loss. Our sponsor and its subsidiaries also have substantial secured and unsecured debt obligations coming due in the next several years. During 2012, three programs sponsored by our sponsor failed to make interest payments on their privately issued notes. In April and May 2012, each of TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC and TNP Profit Participation Program, LLC failed to timely make monthly interest payments to investors (such payments were subsequently made in May and June 2012, respectively). If these programs (each of which is a subsidiary of our sponsor) continue to fail to timely make the required payments to investors, the programs may be in default pursuant to the terms of such programs and the payment of the outstanding indebtedness on these programs may be accelerated. In addition, during 2012, TNP 12% Notes Program, LLC defaulted on its notes program and suspended all interest payments to investors. However, effective November 7, 2012, the majority of the TNP 12% Notes Program, LLC note holders affirmatively voted to waive any prior defaults and modify certain terms of the notes, including a significant reduction in the interest rate and an extension of the maturity date until June 2016. These programs are subsidiaries of our sponsor, and the proceeds of such borrowings were used, in part, to fund our sponsor’s operations. The audit committee of our board of directors recently engaged an independent financial advisor to evaluate the financial health of our sponsor. We estimated that our sponsor’s liabilities exceeded its assets by approximately $45 million as of September 30, 2012 (the latest available financial information) and that, as the date of this annual report, our sponsor has a negative working capital position.

If our sponsor is unable to both negotiate a modification to its debt obligations and improve its financial performance, the ability of our advisor and our property manager to perform their duties to us could be compromised. Moreover, attending to these adverse conditions could require a significant amount of time on the part of our advisor and its affiliates, thereby decreasing the amount of time they spend actively managing our investments. We believe that there is a significant risk that our sponsor’s financial condition could prompt us to seek alternative service providers or become self-managed. It may be very difficult to engage alternative service providers (which would require the consent of some of our significant lenders and certain regulatory approvals) or become self-managed. If we determine that we need to seek alternative service providers or become self-managed and are unable to successfully do so, such failure would result in a substantial disruption to our business and would adversely affect the value of an investment in us. Even if we were successful in doing so, such efforts would involve significant disruption to our business, which may adversely affect the value of your investment in us.

We are actively negotiating with a new advisor and negotiating a termination of the advisory agreement with our advisor. If we change advisors, such changes would disrupt our business and could cause the value of your investment in us to decline.

We are actively negotiating with Glenborough to become our advisor and take over property management of our properties. We are also negotiating a termination of the advisory agreement and the property management agreement with our advisor. Changes to our advisor and property manager may cause disruption with our operations and may impact our results. Payments to our existing advisor relating to the termination of the advisory agreement and property management agreement could adversely impact our liquidity and/or operations.

Many of our debt obligations will need to be modified to provide for a change in advisor and property manager. If we are unable to negotiate a modification to our debt obligations our ability to change advisor and property manager without greater disruption would be compromised. We may also not be successful in negotiating a new advisory agreement and/or property management agreements with Glenborough. If we are unable to reach agreement with a successor advisor and/or property manager, such failure would likely result in a substantial disruption to our business and would likely adversely affect the value of an investment in us. Even if we were successful in transitioning to a new advisor and property manager, such efforts are causing a significant disruption to our business, which may adversely affect the value of your investment in us.

We raised substantially less than 50% of the maximum amount we sought to raise in our initial public offering, which terminated on February 7, 2013. As a result, we will not be able to invest in as diverse a portfolio of properties as we otherwise would, which may cause the value of your investment to vary more widely with the performance of specific assets, and our general and administrative expenses are likely to constitute a greater percentage of our revenue. Our inability to raise greater proceeds in our completed initial public offering, therefore, could increase the risk that you will lose money on your investment.

Our initial public offering terminated on February 7, 2013. Our initial public offering was made on a “best efforts” basis, whereby the brokers participating in the offering had no firm commitment to purchase any shares. The proceeds we raised in our initial public offering were lower than our sponsor and dealer manager originally expected. As a result, we have not been able to make the number of investments than originally intended, resulting in less diversification in terms of the number of investments owned, the geographic regions in which our investments are located, the industries in which our tenants operate and the length of lease terms with our tenants. In addition, we will be limited in the number of investments we are able to make in the future. Finally, adverse developments with respect to a single property, a geographic region, a small number of tenants, a tenant industry or rental rates when we renew or release a property may have a greater adverse impact than they otherwise would.

Our property management agreements are long-term agreements, which we generally cannot terminate except for “cause.” Such long-term contracts may hinder our ability to obtain property management services at lower rates in the future or to locate an alternative advisor because any replacement advisor may also desire to serve as our property manager.

Our property management agreements expire between 2030 and 2032. Generally, we may only terminate these agreements for “cause,” as defined in the agreements. As a result, should property management services be available on better terms in the future, we may not be able to change property managers and realize the benefits of such improved terms. Furthermore, should we need to find an alternative advisor, long-term property management agreements may frustrate our efforts because any alternative advisor may desire to serve as our property manager as well. Therefore, the long-term, non-terminable nature of our property management agreements may adversely affect the value of your investment in us.

Our board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.60 for our shares of common stock as of November 9, 2012. You should not rely on the estimated value per share as being an accurate measure of the current value of our shares of common stock.

On November 9, 2012, our board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.60 for our common stock as of November 9, 2012. We did not, however, change the price per share in our initial public offering, under our distribution reinvestment program or under our share redemption program, except in the case of redemptions upon the death or disability of a stockholder, in which case we will use the higher of the most recently determined estimated share value and the purchase price paid. We disclose in our filings with the SEC the methodology used to determine the estimated value per share and numerous limitations related to the estimated value per share. Please see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 13, 2012 for a detailed description of the estimated share valuation methodology and limitations.

Our board of directors’ objective in determining the estimated per share value was to arrive at a value, based on the most recent data available, that it believed was reasonable based on methodologies that it deemed appropriate after consultation with our advisor and after reviewing, among other factors, appraisal reports of our properties prepared by third parties. However, the market for commercial real estate can fluctuate quickly and substantially and values are expected to change in the future and may decrease. Also, our board of directors did not consider certain other factors, such as a liquidity discount.

As with any valuation methodology, the methodologies used to determine the estimated value per share were based upon a number of assumptions, estimates and judgments that may not be accurate or complete. Further, different parties using different property-specific and general real estate and capital market assumptions, estimates, judgments and standards could derive a different estimated value per share, which could be significantly different from the estimated value per share determined by our board of directors. The estimated value per share does not represent the fair value of our assets less liabilities in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The estimated value per share is not a representation or indication that: a stockholder would be able to realize the estimated share value if he or she attempts to sell shares; a stockholder would ultimately realize distributions per share equal to the estimated value per share upon liquidation of assets and settlement of our liabilities or upon a sale of our company; shares of our common stock would trade at the estimated value per share on a national securities exchange; a third party would offer the estimated value per share in an arms-length transaction to purchase all or substantially all of our shares of common stock; or the methodologies used to estimate the value per share would be acceptable to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, or under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA, with respect to their respective requirements. Our board of directors believes that certain events subsequent to the determination of the estimated per share value may have an adverse impact on the estimated value per share. As a result, stockholders should not rely on the historical estimated value per share as being an accurate measure of the current value of our shares of common stock.

Failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting could have an adverse effect on our operations.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports, our reputation and operating results could be harmed. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we identified a significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting related to our making certain prepayments of acquisition fees and financing fees to our advisor prior to the closing of the transaction. In each case, the fees were ultimately earned by the advisor. We have taken steps to develop additional controls and procedures to remediate this significant deficiency including: (a) an appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer who is independent from the advisor and has no involvement with the advisor’s affairs; (b) dual approval for payments of non-operating expenditures including payments to advisor for transactions, for which one of the approvers must be an independent director; and (c) the formation of a special committee of the board of directors comprised entirely of our independent directors. The special committee has the maximum power delegable to a committee of the board of directors under Maryland law and has the authority to (1) engage its own financial and legal advisors; (2) execute, deliver and file or to cause to be executed, delivered and filed all agreements, documents and instruments in our name and on our behalf as the special committee may deem necessary, convenient or appropriate; (3) expend money on our behalf; and (4) to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, keep private from our board of directors and our officers the minutes of its meetings and other matters. However, the foregoing changes may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future, including compliance with the obligations under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we are unable to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting we may not be able to provide reliable financial reports, which, in turn could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could limit our ability to access the capital markets and require us to incur additional costs to improve our internal control systems and procedures.

We have a limited operating history and there is no assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve our investment objectives.

We commenced operations on November 19, 2009 with the acquisition of our first real estate asset. As a result, we have a limited operating history and may not be able to successfully operate our business or achieve our investment objectives. An investment in our shares of common stock may therefore entail more risk than an investment in the shares of common stock of a REIT with a substantial operating history. In addition, you should not rely on the past performance of prior programs managed or sponsored by Thompson National Properties, LLC, or TNP, or our sponsor, or its affiliates to predict our future results. Our investment strategy and key employees differ from the investment strategies and key employees of these prior programs.

There is no trading market for shares of our common stock and we are not required to effectuate a liquidity event by a certain date. As a result, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares of common stock and, if you are able to sell your shares, you are likely to sell them at a substantial discount.

There is no current public market for the shares of our common stock and we have no obligation to list our shares on any public securities market or provide any other type of liquidity to our stockholders. It will therefore be difficult for you to sell your shares of common stock promptly or at all. Even if you are able to sell your shares of common stock, the absence of a public market may cause the price received for any shares of our common stock sold to be less than what you paid or less than your proportionate value of the assets we own. We have adopted a share redemption program but it is limited in terms of the amount of shares that may be purchased each quarter, and effective as of January 15, 2013 we have suspended our share redemption program indefinitely. Additionally, our charter does not require that we consummate a transaction to provide liquidity to stockholders on any date certain or at all. As a result, you should be prepared to hold your shares for an indefinite length of time.

Our sponsor has operated at a significant loss since inception and because we are dependent upon our advisor and its affiliates, including our sponsor, to conduct our operations, any adverse changes in the financial health of our advisor or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and the return on our stockholders’ investment.

We are dependent on our advisor to manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. Our advisor depends on the capital from our sponsor and fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of assets and on our sponsor to conduct its operations. Our sponsor has a limited operating history and, since inception, has operated at a significant loss. Our sponsor also has substantial secured and unsecured debt obligations coming due over the next four years. To the extent that our sponsor is unable to negotiate a modification to its debt obligations or our sponsor’s financial condition does not improve or deteriorates, it may adversely impact our advisor’s ability to perform its duties to us or could have an adverse effect on our operations and cause the value of your investment to decrease. Moreover, such adverse conditions could require a substantial amount of time on the part of our advisor and its affiliates, thereby decreasing the amount of time they spend actively managing our investments. Any adverse changes in the financial condition of our advisor or our sponsor or our relationship with them could hinder our advisor’s ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. If our sponsor and its affiliates, including our advisor, are unable to provide services to us we may spend substantial resources in identifying non-affiliated service providers to provide advisory and dealer manager functions.

All of our cash distributions to date have been made from proceeds from our public offering. Distributions are not guaranteed, may fluctuate, and may constitute a return of capital or taxable gain from the sale or exchange of property.

From August 2009 to December 2012, our board of directors declared monthly cash distributions of $0.05833 per share of common stock, which represents an annualized distribution of $0.70 per share if paid each day over a 365-day period. Effective January 15, 2013, we announced that we will no longer be making monthly distributions. Quarterly distributions will be considered by our board of directors for 2013. As of March 19, 2013, we announced that we will not be making a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. There is no guarantee that we will resume paying distributions in the short term or at all, or that we will resume paying distributions at the previous rate.

The actual amount and timing of any future distributions will be determined by our board of directors and typically will depend upon, among other things, the amount of funds available for distribution, which will depend on items such as current and projected cash requirements and tax considerations. As a result, our distribution rate and payment frequency may vary from time to time. Our long-term strategy is to fund the payment of monthly distributions to our stockholders entirely from our funds from operations. However, during the early stages of our operations and until our financial condition improves substantially (if ever), we may need to borrow funds, request that our advisor, in its discretion, defer its receipt of fees and reimbursement of expenses or utilize offering proceeds in order to make cash distributions. All of our cash distributions since our inception have been made from proceeds from our initial public offering. Accordingly, the amount of distributions paid at any given time may not reflect current cash flow from operations.

To the extent that we are unable to consistently fund distributions to our stockholders entirely from our funds from operations, the value of your shares upon a listing of our common stock, the sale of our assets or any other liquidity event will likely be reduced. Further, if the aggregate amount of cash distributed in any given year exceeds the amount of our “REIT taxable income” generated during the year, the excess amount will either be (1) a return of capital or (2) gain from the sale or exchange of property to the extent that a stockholder’s basis in our common stock equals or is reduced to zero as the result of our current or prior year distributions. In addition, to the extent we make distributions to stockholders with sources other than funds from operations, the amount of cash that is distributed from such sources will limit the amount of investments that we can make, which will in turn negatively impact our ability to achieve our investment objectives and limit our ability to make future distributions.

To date, all of our cash distributions paid have been made from offering proceeds and constituted a return of capital.

Because the funds from the operation of our business have not been sufficient to cover our distributions, to date, we have paid all of our cash distributions from the proceeds of our public offering. Therefore, you should not consider our distribution as a measure of the cash flow generated by our business and you should not consider the distributions as a reflection of the quality of our investments. Generally, distributions paid using offering proceeds will constitute a return of capital, which means a return of all or a portion of your original investment. Additionally, distributions that are treated as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes generally will not be taxable as a dividend to a stockholder, but will reduce the stockholder’s basis in its shares (but not below zero) and therefore can result in the stockholder having a higher gain upon a subsequent sale of such shares. Return of capital distributions in excess of a stockholder’s basis generally will be treated as gain from the sale of such shares.

We may suffer from delays in locating suitable investments, which could adversely affect the return on your investment.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to make distributions to our stockholders is dependent upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition of our investments and the determination of any financing arrangements as well as the performance of our property manager in the selection of tenants and the negotiation of leases. The current market for properties that meet our investment objectives is highly competitive, as is the leasing market for such properties.

You must rely entirely on the oversight of our board of directors, the management ability of our advisor and the performance of the property manager. We cannot be sure that our advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms. Additionally, we could suffer from delays in locating suitable investments as a result of our reliance on our advisor at times when management of our advisor is simultaneously seeking to locate suitable investments for other programs sponsored by our sponsor and its affiliates, some of which have investment objectives and employ investment strategies that are similar to ours.

As a public company, we are subject to the ongoing reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the Exchange Act, we may be required to file with the SEC financial statements of properties we acquire or, in certain cases, financial statements of the tenants of the acquired properties. To the extent any required financial statements are not available or cannot be obtained, we will not be able to acquire the property. As a result, we may not be able to acquire certain properties that otherwise would be a suitable investment. We could suffer delays in our property acquisitions due to these reporting requirements.

We may have to make decisions on whether to invest in certain properties without detailed information on the property.

To effectively compete for the acquisition of properties and other investments, our advisor and board of directors may be required to make decisions or post substantial non-refundable deposits prior to the completion of our analysis and due diligence on property acquisitions. In such cases, the information available to our advisor and board of directors at the time of making any particular investment decision, including the decision to pay any non-refundable deposit and the decision to consummate any particular acquisition, may be limited, and our advisor and board of directors may not have access to detailed information regarding any particular investment property, such as physical characteristics, environmental matters, zoning regulations or other local conditions affecting the investment property. Therefore, no assurance can be given that our advisor and board of directors will have knowledge of all circumstances that may adversely affect an investment. In addition, our advisor and board of directors rely upon independent consultants in connection with their evaluation of proposed investment properties, and no assurance can be given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information provided by such independent consultants.

Payment of fees to our advisor and its affiliates reduces cash available for investment, which may result in our stockholders not receiving a full return of their invested capital.

Because a portion of the offering price from the sale of our shares in our now completed initial public offering has been and will continue to be used to pay expenses and fees, the full offering price paid by stockholders will not be invested in real properties and other real estate-related assets. As a result, stockholders will only receive a full return of their invested capital if either (1) we sell our assets or our company for a sufficient amount in excess of the original purchase price of our assets or (2) the market value of our company after we list our shares of common stock on a national securities exchange is substantially in excess of the original purchase price of our assets.

If we internalize our management functions, your interest in us could be diluted and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed.

Our board of directors may decide in the future to internalize our management functions. If we do so, we may elect to negotiate to acquire our advisor’s assets and personnel. At this time, we cannot anticipate the form or amount of consideration or other terms relating to any such acquisition. Such consideration could take many forms, including cash payments, promissory notes and shares of our common stock. The payment of such consideration could result in dilution of your interests as a stockholder and could reduce the earnings per share and funds from operations per share attributable to your investment.

Additionally, while we would no longer bear the costs of the various fees and expenses we pay to our advisor under the advisory agreement, our direct expenses would include general and administrative costs, including legal, accounting and other expenses related to corporate governance, SEC reporting and compliance. We would also be required to employ personnel and would be subject to potential liabilities commonly faced by employers, such as workers disability and compensation claims, potential labor disputes and other employee-related liabilities and grievances as well as incur the compensation and benefits costs of our officers and other employees and consultants that were being paid by our advisor or its affiliates. We may issue equity awards to officers, employees and consultants, which awards would decrease net income and funds from operations and may further dilute your investment. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of fees to our advisor we would save or the costs we would incur if we became self-managed. If the expenses we assume as a result of an internalization are higher than the expenses we avoid paying to our advisor, our earnings per share and funds from operations per share would be lower as a result of the internalization than it otherwise would have been, potentially decreasing the amount of funds available to distribute to our stockholders and the value of our shares.

Internalization transactions involving the acquisition of advisors or property managers affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in properties or other investments or to pay distributions.

If we internalize our management functions, we could have difficulty integrating these functions as a stand-alone entity. Currently, our advisor and its affiliates perform asset management and certain general and administrative functions. These personnel have substantial know-how and experience which provides us with economies of scale. We may fail to properly identify the appropriate mix of personnel and capital needs to operate as a stand-alone entity. An inability to manage an internalization transaction effectively could thus result in our incurring excess costs and suffering potential deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting. Such deficiencies could cause us to incur additional costs, and our management’s attention could be diverted from most effectively managing our real properties and other real estate-related assets.

You are limited in your ability to sell your shares of common stock pursuant to our share redemption program. You may not be able to sell any of your shares of our common stock back to us, and if you do sell your shares, you may not receive the price you paid upon subscription.

Our share redemption program may provide you with an opportunity to have your shares of common stock redeemed by us. We anticipate that shares of our common stock may be redeemed on a quarterly basis. However, our share redemption program contains certain restrictions and limitations, including those relating to the number of shares of our common stock that we can redeem at any given time and limiting the redemption price. Specifically, we limit the number of shares to be redeemed during any calendar year to no more than (1) 5% of the weighted average of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year and (2) those that could be funded from the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan in the prior calendar year plus such additional funds as may be borrowed or reserved for that purpose by our board of directors. In addition, our board of directors reserves the right to reject any redemption request for any reason or no reason or to amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time. Therefore, you may not have the opportunity to make a redemption request prior to a potential termination of the share redemption program and you may not be able to sell any of your shares of common stock back to us pursuant to our share redemption program. Moreover, if you do sell your shares of common stock back to us pursuant to the share redemption program, you may not receive the same price you paid for any shares of our common stock being redeemed.

Due to liquidity issues and defaults under certain of our loan agreements, effective January 15, 2013, we suspended our share redemption program, including with respect to redemptions upon death and disability. We intend to revisit our capacity to resume share redemptions after transitioning to a new advisor and addressing our liquidity issues. However, there is no guarantee that we will resume share redemptions in the short term or at all. Our ability to resume share redemptions will be determined by our board of directors based upon our liquidity and cash needs.

Payments to the holder of the special units may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of our shares of common stock upon consummation of a liquidity event.

As the holder of the special units of our operating partnership, TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our sponsor, may be entitled to receive a cash payment upon dispositions of our operating partnership’s assets and a promissory note, cash or shares of our common stock upon the occurrence of specified events, including, among other events, a listing of our shares on an exchange or the termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement. Payments to the holder of the special units upon dispositions of our operating partnership’s assets and redemptions of the special units may reduce cash available for distribution to our stockholders and the value of shares of our common stock upon consummation of a liquidity event.

Changes in the composition of our board of directors could constitute events of default under certain of our loan agreements.

In November 2012, we financed the acquisition of the Lahaina Gateway with a loan from DOF IV REIT Holdings, LLC, or the Lahaina lender. The loan agreement with the Lahaina lender provides that changes in the composition of our board of directors without the Lahaina lender’s prior consent will constitute an event of default under the loan agreement. As a result, we may not be able to change the composition of our board of directors without risking a default under the loan agreement if the Lahaina lender does not consent to such changes. These provisions may limit our ability to change the composition of our board even if such changes may be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

Risks Related To Our Business

Changing laws and regulations have resulted in increased compliance costs for us, which could affect our operating results.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and newly enacted SEC regulations, have created, and may create in the future, additional compliance requirements for companies such as ours. For instance, our advisor may be required to register as an investment advisor under federal or state regulations which will subject it to additional compliance procedures and reporting obligations as well as potential penalties for non-compliance. As a result of such additional regulation, we intend to invest appropriate resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment has resulted and will likely continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Events in U.S. and global financial markets have had, and may continue to have, a negative impact on the terms and availability of credit in the United States and the state of the national economy generally which could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

The failure of large U.S. financial institutions in 2008 and 2009 and the resulting turmoil in the global financial sector has had, and will likely continue to have, a negative impact on the terms and availability of credit and the state of the economy generally within the United States. The tightening of the U.S. credit markets has resulted in a lack of adequate credit and the risk of a further economic downturn. Some lenders continue to impose more stringent restrictions on the terms of credit and there may be a general reduction in the amount of credit available in the markets in which we conduct business. The negative impact of the tightening of the credit markets may result in an inability to finance the acquisition of real properties and other real estate-related assets on favorable terms, if at all, increased financing costs or financing with increasingly restrictive covenants. If the credit markets remain constricted, it may result in our inability to obtain adequate financing or to refinance debt obligations as they come due on favorable terms, or at all.

Additionally, decreasing home prices and mortgage defaults have resulted in uncertainty in the real estate and real estate securities and debt markets. As a result, the valuation of real estate-related assets has been volatile and is likely to continue to be volatile in the future. The volatility in markets may make it more difficult for us to obtain adequate financing or realize gains on our investments which could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

We are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire real properties or other real estate-related assets, fund or expand our operations and pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

The net proceeds from our initial public offering, which was terminated on February 7, 2013, have been used primarily to fund our investment in real properties and other real estate-related assets, for payment of operating expenses, for payment of various fees and expenses such as acquisition fees and management fees and for payment of our distributions to our stockholders. Proceeds from our public offering are no longer available as a source of funding for our capital needs and as discussed below, our cash and cash equivalents are currently limited. In addition, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for investments, the improvement of our real properties or for any other reason, sources of funding may not be available to us. If we cannot establish reserves out of cash flow generated by our investments or out of net sale proceeds in non-liquidating sale transactions, or obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire real properties and other real estate-related assets, to expand our operations and make distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

On August 2, 2012, we, our operating partnership and our advisor entered into an amendment to our advisory agreement, effective as of August 7, 2012, which, among other things, establishes a requirement that we maintain at all times a cash reserve of at least $4.0 million and provides that our advisor may deploy any cash proceeds in excess of the cash reserve for our business pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement. As a result of the significant cash requirement in completing the acquisition of Lahaina Gateway and the cash required by the lender following the acquisition for a mandatory principal repayment and the establishment of cash reserves, our cash position has fallen to less than $4.0 million and is likely to fall further and remain below our $4.0 million target until we find other sources of cash, such as from borrowings, sales of assets or sales of equity capital. Any delay in securing additional debt or equity capital could adversely affect our ability to declare additional distributions or to meet our obligations as they become due.

Risks Relating to Our Organizational Structure

Maryland law and our organizational documents limit your right to bring claims against our officers and directors.

Maryland law provides that a director will not have any liability as a director so long as he or she performs his or her duties in accordance with the applicable standard of conduct. Our charter provides that, subject to the applicable limitations set forth therein or under Maryland law, no director or officer will be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages. Our charter also provides that we will generally indemnify our directors, our officers, our advisor and its affiliates for losses they may incur by reason of their service in those capacities unless their act or omission was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, they actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services or, in the case of any criminal proceeding, they had reasonable cause to believe the act or omission was unlawful. Moreover, we have entered into separate indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. As a result, we and our stockholders may have more limited rights against these persons than might otherwise exist under common law. In addition, we may be obligated to fund the defense costs incurred by these persons in some cases. However, our charter does provide that we may not indemnify our directors, our advisor and its affiliates for loss or liability suffered by them or hold our directors or our advisor and its affiliates harmless for loss or liability suffered by us unless they have determined that the course of conduct that caused the loss or liability was in our best interests, they were acting on our behalf or performing services for us, the liability was not the result of negligence or misconduct by our non-independent directors, our advisor and its affiliates or gross negligence or willful misconduct by our independent directors, and the indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our net assets, including the proceeds of insurance, and not from the stockholders.

The limit on the percentage of shares of our common stock that any person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination that may benefit our stockholders.

Our charter restricts the direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the value of our then outstanding capital stock (which includes common stock and any preferred stock we may issue) and no more than 9.8% of the value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of our then outstanding common stock unless exempted by our board of directors. This restriction may discourage a change of control of us and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for shares of our common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to stockholders or which may cause a change in our management. In addition to deterring potential transactions that may be favorable to our stockholders, these provisions may also decrease your ability to sell your shares of our common stock.

We may issue preferred stock or other classes of common stock, which issuance could adversely affect the holders of our common stock issued pursuant to our initial public offering.

Our stockholders do not have preemptive rights to any shares issued by us in the future. We may issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock or other classes of common stock with rights that could dilute the value of your shares of common stock. However, the issuance of preferred stock must also be approved by a majority of our independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, who will have access, at our expense, to our legal counsel or to independent legal counsel. In some instances, the issuance of preferred stock or other classes of common stock would increase the number of stockholders entitled to distributions without simultaneously increasing the size of our asset base.

Our charter authorizes us to issue 450,000,000 shares of capital stock, of which 400,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as common stock and 50,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as preferred stock. Our board of directors may amend our charter to increase the aggregate number of authorized shares of capital stock or the number of authorized shares of capital stock of any class or series without stockholder approval. If we ever create and issue preferred stock with a distribution preference over common stock, payment of any distribution preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of distributions on our common stock. Further, holders of preferred stock are normally entitled to receive a preference payment in the event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up before any payment is made to our common stockholders, likely reducing the amount common stockholders would otherwise receive upon such an occurrence. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or a separate class or series of common stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage:

Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest with limited partners in our operating partnership whose interests may not be aligned with those of our stockholders.

We have in the past, and may in the future, issue limited partner interests of our operating partnership in connection with certain transactions. Limited partners in our operating partnership have the right to vote on certain amendments to the operating partnership agreement, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. As general partner of our operating partnership, we are obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of our operating partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interests of limited partners in our operating partnership may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. These conflicts may be resolved in a manner stockholders do not believe are in their best interest.

In addition, TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC, the holder of special units in our operating partnership, may be entitled to (1) certain cash payments upon the disposition of certain of our operating partnership’s assets or (2) a one-time payment in the form of cash, a promissory note or shares of our common stock in conjunction with the redemption of the special units upon the occurrence of a listing of our shares on a national stock exchange or certain events that result in the termination or non-renewal of our advisory agreement. This potential obligation to make substantial payments to the holder of the special units may reduce our cash available for distribution to stockholders and limit the amount that stockholders will receive upon the consummation of a liquidity event.

Your investment return may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act; if we are subject to registration under the Investment Company Act, we will not be able to continue our business.

Neither we, nor our operating partnership, nor any of our subsidiaries intend to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act. As of the date of this Annual Report, we, through our subsidiaries, own twenty commercial retail, single and multi-tenant properties. In order for us not to be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act, we engage, through our operating partnership and subsidiaries, primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year of the termination of our initial public offering, which occurred on February 7, 2013. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of our initial public offering in properties within one year of the termination of our initial public offering, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns, which would reduce the cash available for distribution to investors and possibly lower your returns.

We expect that most of our assets will be held through wholly owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership. We expect that most of these subsidiaries will be outside the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act as they are generally expected to hold at least 60% of their assets in real property. Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act defines an investment company as any issuer that is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of the issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which we refer to as the “40% test.” Excluded from the term “investment securities,” among other things, are U.S. government securities and securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act. We also expect that we and our operating partnership, as holding companies that conduct their businesses through our subsidiaries, will not meet the definition of an investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act.

In the event that the value of investment securities held by the subsidiaries of our operating partnership were to exceed 40%, we expect our subsidiaries to be able to rely on the exclusion from the definition of “investment company” provided by Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act. Section 3(c)(5)(C), as interpreted by the staff of the SEC, requires each of our subsidiaries relying on this exception to invest at least 55% of its portfolio in “mortgage and other liens on and interests in real estate,” which we refer to as “qualifying real estate investments” and maintain an additional 25% of its assets in qualifying real estate investments or other real estate-related assets, or the 25% basket. The remaining 20% of the portfolio can consist of miscellaneous assets. What we buy and sell is therefore limited to these criteria. How we determine to classify our assets for purposes of the Investment Company Act will be based in large measure upon no-action letters issued by the SEC staff in the past and other SEC interpretive guidance. These no-action positions were issued in accordance with factual situations that may be substantially different from the factual situations we may face, and a number of these no-action positions were issued more than ten years ago. Pursuant to this guidance, and depending on the characteristics of the specific investments, certain mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities, mezzanine loans, joint venture investments and the equity securities of other entities may not constitute qualifying real estate investments and therefore investments in these types of assets may be limited. No assurance can be given that the SEC will concur with our classification of our assets. Future revisions to the Investment Company Act or further guidance from the SEC may cause us to lose our exclusion from registration or force us to re-evaluate our portfolio and our investment strategy. Such changes may prevent us from operating our business successfully.

In the event that we, or our operating partnership, were to acquire assets that could make either entity fall within the definition of investment company under Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act, we believe that we would still qualify for an exclusion from registration pursuant to Section 3(c)(6). Although the SEC staff has issued little interpretive guidance with respect to Section 3(c)(6), we believe that we and our operating partnership may rely on Section 3(c)(6) if 55% of the assets of our operating partnership consist of, and at least 55% of the income of our operating partnership is derived from, qualifying real estate investments owned by wholly owned or majority-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership.

To ensure that neither we, nor our operating partnership nor subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company, each entity may be unable to sell assets they would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets they would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we, our operating company or our subsidiaries may be required to acquire additional income- or loss-generating assets that we might not otherwise acquire or forego opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire. Although we, our operating partnership and our subsidiaries intend to monitor our portfolio periodically and prior to each acquisition, any of these entities may not be able to maintain an exclusion from registration as an investment company. If we, our operating partnership or our subsidiaries are required to register as an investment company but fail to do so, the unregistered entity would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against such entity. In addition, the contracts of such entity would be unenforceable unless a court required enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of the entity and liquidate its business.

Risks Related To Conflicts of Interest

We may compete with other affiliates of our advisor for opportunities to acquire or sell investments, which may have an adverse impact on our operations.

We may compete with other affiliates of our advisor for opportunities to acquire or sell real properties and other real estate-related assets. We may also buy or sell real properties and other real estate-related assets at the same time as other affiliates are considering buying or selling similar assets. In this regard, there is a risk that our advisor will select for us investments that provide lower returns to us than investments purchased by another affiliate. Certain of our affiliates own or manage real properties in geographical areas in which we expect to own real properties. As a result of our potential competition with other affiliates of our advisor, certain investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to us may not in fact be available. This competition may also result in conflicts of interest that are not resolved in our favor.

The time and resources that our advisor and some of its affiliates, including our officers and directors, devote to us may be diverted, and we may face additional competition due to the fact that affiliates of our advisor are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another entity that makes the same types of investments that we target.

Our advisor and some of its affiliates, including our officers and directors, are not prohibited from raising money for, or managing, another investment entity that makes the same types of investments as those we target. For example, our advisor’s management currently manages several privately offered real estate programs sponsored by affiliates of our advisor. As a result, the time and resources they could devote to us may be diverted. In addition, we may compete with any such investment entity for the same investors and investment opportunities. We may also co-invest with any such investment entity. Even though all such co-investments will be subject to approval by our independent directors, they could be on terms not as favorable to us as those we could achieve co-investing with a third party.

Our advisor and its affiliates, including certain of our officers and one of our directors, face conflicts of interest caused by compensation arrangements with us and other affiliates, which could result in actions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our advisor and its affiliates receive substantial fees from us in return for their services and these fees could influence the advice provided to us. Among other matters, the compensation arrangements could affect their judgment with respect to:

Further, our advisor may recommend that we invest in a particular asset or pay a higher purchase price for the asset than it would otherwise recommend if it did not receive an acquisition fee. Certain acquisition fees and asset management fees payable to our advisor and property management fees payable to the property manager are payable irrespective of the quality of the underlying real estate or property management services during the term of the related agreement. These fees may influence our advisor to recommend transactions with respect to the sale of a property or properties that may not be in our best interest at the time. Investments with higher net operating income growth potential are generally riskier or more speculative. In addition, the premature sale of an asset may add concentration risk to the portfolio or may be at a price lower than if we held on to the asset. Moreover, our advisor has considerable discretion with respect to the terms and timing of acquisition, disposition, refinancing and leasing transactions. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn these fees may lead our advisor to place undue emphasis on criteria relating to its compensation at the expense of other criteria, such as the preservation of capital, to achieve higher short-term compensation. Considerations relating to our affiliates’ compensation from us and other affiliates of our advisor could result in decisions that are not in the best interests of our stockholders, which could hurt our ability to pay you distributions or result in a decline in the value of your investment.

The conflicts of interest faced by our officers may cause us not to be managed solely in the best interests of our stockholders, which may adversely affect our results of operations and the value of your investment.

Some of our officers are officers and employees of our sponsor, our advisor and other affiliated entities which receive fees in connection with our operations. Anthony W. Thompson is our Chairman of the Board, Co-Chief Executive Officer and President and also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of our sponsor. Mr. Thompson controls our sponsor and indirectly controls our advisor and dealer manager. Certain of our officers also own an economic interest in TNP SRT Management, LLC, which owns a 25% interest in our advisor. The ownership interest in our advisor and sponsor by certain of our officers may create conflicts of interest and cause us not to be managed solely in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our advisor may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire assets from its affiliates or enter into joint ventures with its affiliates. As a result, in any such transaction we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

Our advisor may cause us to invest in a property owned by, or make an investment in equity securities in or real estate-related loans to, one of its affiliates or through a joint venture with its affiliates. In these circumstances, our advisor will have a conflict of interest when fulfilling its fiduciary obligation to us. In any such transaction, we would not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The fees we pay to affiliates in connection with the acquisition and management of our investments were not determined on an arm’s-length basis; therefore, we do not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

The fees paid to our advisor and our property manager and other affiliates for services they provide for us were not determined on an arm’s-length basis. As a result, the fees have been determined without the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties and may be in excess of amounts that we would otherwise pay to third parties for such services.

We may purchase real property and other real estate-related assets from third parties who have existing or previous business relationships with affiliates of our advisor, and, as a result, in any such transaction, we may not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties.

We may purchase real property and other real estate-related assets from third parties that have existing or previous business relationships with affiliates of our advisor. The officers, directors or employees of our advisor and its affiliates and the principals of our advisor who also perform services for other affiliates of our advisor may have a conflict in representing our interests in these transactions on the one hand and the interests of such affiliates in preserving or furthering their respective relationships on the other hand. In any such transaction, we will not have the benefit of arm’s-length negotiations of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties, and the purchase price or fees paid by us may be in excess of amounts that we would otherwise pay to third parties.

Risks Related To Investments In Real Estate Generally

Changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

We are subject to risks generally attributable to the ownership of real estate assets, including: changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions; changes in supply of or demand for similar properties in an area; increased competition for real estate assets targeted by our investment strategy; bankruptcies, financial difficulties or lease defaults by our tenants; changes in interest rates and availability of financing; and changes in government rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws.

We are unable to predict future changes in national, regional or local economic, demographic or real estate market conditions. For example, a recession or rise in interest rates could make it more difficult for us to lease real properties or dispose of them. In addition, rising interest rates could also make alternative interest-bearing and other investments more attractive and therefore potentially lower the relative value of the real estate assets we acquire. These conditions, or others we cannot predict, may adversely affect our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

Changes in supply of or demand for similar real properties in a particular area may increase the price of real properties we seek to purchase and decrease the price of real properties when we seek to sell them.

The real estate industry is subject to market forces. We are unable to predict certain market changes including changes in supply of, or demand for, similar real properties in a particular area. Any potential purchase of an overpriced asset could decrease our rate of return on these investments and result in lower operating results and overall returns to our stockholders.

Our operating expenses may increase in the future and, to the extent such increases cannot be passed on to tenants, our cash flow and our operating results would decrease.

Operating expenses at our properties, such as expenses for fuel, utilities, labor and insurance, are not fixed and may increase in the future. There is no guarantee that we will be able to pass such increases on to our tenants. To the extent such increases cannot be passed on to tenants, any such increase would cause our cash flow and our operating results to decrease.

Increasing vacancy rates for certain classes of real estate assets resulting from an economic downturn and disruption in the financial markets could adversely affect the value of assets we acquire.

We depend upon tenants for a majority of our revenue from real property investments. An economic downturn and disruption in the financial markets may result in a trend toward increasing vacancy rates for certain classes of commercial property, particularly in large metropolitan areas, due to increased tenant delinquencies and/or defaults under leases, generally lower demand for rentable space and potential oversupply of rentable space. Business failures and downsizings may lead to reduced consumer demand for retail products and services and reduced demand for retail space. Reduced demand for retail properties could require us to grant rent concessions, make tenant improvement expenditures or reduce rental rates to maintain occupancies beyond those anticipated at the time we acquire a property. A prolonged recovery or a future economic downturn could impact certain of the real estate assets we may acquire and such real estate assets could experience higher levels of vacancy than anticipated at the time of our acquisition of such real estate assets. The value of our real estate assets could decrease below the amounts we paid for them. Revenues from properties could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and potential increases in uncollectible rent. Additionally, we will incur expenses, such as for maintenance costs, insurances costs and property taxes, even though a property is vacant. The longer the period of significant vacancies for a property, the greater the potential negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. An economic downturn resulting in increased tenant delinquencies and/or defaults and decreases in demand could have a material adverse effect on our operations and the value of our real estate assets.

Our real properties are subject to property taxes that may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our cash flow.

Our real properties are subject to real and personal property taxes that may increase as tax rates change and as the real properties are assessed or reassessed by taxing authorities. Certain of our leases provide that the property taxes, or increases therein, are charged to the lessees as an expense related to the real properties that they occupy, while other leases provide that we are responsible for such taxes. In any case, as the owner of the properties, we are ultimately responsible for payment of the taxes to the applicable government authorities. If real property taxes increase, our tenants may be unable to make the required tax payments, ultimately requiring us to pay the taxes even if otherwise stated under the terms of the lease. If we fail to pay any such taxes, the applicable taxing authority may place a lien on the real property and the real property may be subject to a tax sale. In addition, we will generally be responsible for real property taxes related to any vacant space.

Uninsured losses or premiums for insurance coverage relating to real property may adversely affect your returns.

We attempt to adequately insure all of our real properties against casualty losses. There are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Risks associated with potential terrorist acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. Additionally, mortgage lenders sometimes require commercial property owners to purchase specific coverage against terrorism as a condition for providing mortgage loans. These policies may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all, which could inhibit our ability to finance or refinance our real properties. In such instances, we may be required to provide other financial support, either through financial assurances or self-insurance, to cover potential losses. Changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. In the event that any of our real properties incurs a casualty loss which is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, we cannot assure you that funding will be available to us for repair or reconstruction of damaged real property in the future.

We compete with numerous other parties or entities for real estate assets and tenants and may not compete successfully.

We compete with numerous other persons or entities seeking to buy real estate assets or to attract tenants. These persons or entities may have greater experience and financial strength than us. There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire real estate assets or attract tenants on favorable terms, if at all. For example, our competitors may be willing to offer space at rental rates below our rates, causing us to lose existing or potential tenants and pressuring us to reduce our rental rates to retain existing tenants or convince new tenants to lease space at our properties. Each of these factors could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, value of our investments and ability to pay distributions to you.

Delays in the acquisition, development and construction of real properties may have adverse effects on our results of operations and returns to our stockholders.

Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of real properties could adversely affect your returns. Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction or during the early stages of construction, it will typically take several months to complete construction and rent available space. Therefore, you could suffer delays in receiving cash distributions attributable to those particular real properties. Delays in completion of construction could give tenants the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders prior to completion of construction. Each of those factors could result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. Furthermore, the price we agree to pay for a real property will be based on our projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of the fair market value of real property upon completion of construction. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property.

Actions of joint venture partners could negatively impact our performance.

We may enter into joint ventures with third parties, including with entities that are affiliated with our advisor. We may also purchase and develop properties in joint ventures or in partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, affiliates of the sellers, developers or other persons. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with a direct investment in real estate, including, for example:

Under certain joint venture arrangements, neither venture partner may have the power to control the venture and an impasse could be reached, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In addition, to the extent that our venture partner or co-tenant is an affiliate of our advisor, certain conflicts of interest
will exist.

Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations related to environmental protection and human health and safety may be high.

All real property investments and the operations conducted in connection with such investments are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on such real property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such real property as collateral for future borrowings. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which real property may be used or businesses may be operated. Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our real properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our real properties. There are also various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our real properties, we may be exposed to such costs in connection with such regulations. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of any damages or fines we must pay, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated real property could materially and adversely affect our business, lower the value of our assets or results of operations and, consequently, lower the amounts available for distribution to you.

The costs associated with complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act may reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Investment in real properties may also be subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or ADA. Under the ADA, all places of public accommodation are required to comply with federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. We are committed to complying with the act to the extent to which it applies. The ADA has separate compliance requirements for “public accommodations” and “commercial facilities” that generally require that buildings and services be made accessible and available to people with disabilities. With respect to the properties we acquire, the ADA’s requirements could require us to remove access barriers and could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, monetary penalties or, in some cases, an award of damages. We will attempt to acquire properties that comply with the ADA or place the burden on the seller or other third party, such as a tenant, to ensure compliance with the ADA. We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire properties or allocate responsibilities in this manner. Any monies we use to comply with the ADA will reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Real properties are illiquid investments, and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions or sell a property if or when we decide to do so.

Real properties are illiquid investments. We may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and supply and demand that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any real property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a real property. Also, we may acquire real properties that are subject to contractual “lock-out” provisions that could restrict our ability to dispose of the real property for a period of time. We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.

In acquiring a real property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that real property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that real property. Our real properties may also be subject to resale restrictions. All these provisions would restrict our ability to sell a property, which could reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to our stockholders.

Risks Associated with Retail Property

The recent economic downturn in the United States has had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on the retail industry generally. Slow or negative growth in the retail industry will result in defaults by retail tenants which could have an adverse impact on our financial operations.

The recent economic downturn in the United States has had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the retail industry generally. As a result, the retail industry may continue to face reductions in sales revenues and increased bankruptcies. Adverse economic conditions may result in an increase in distressed or bankrupt retail companies, which in turn could result in an increase in defaults by tenants at our commercial properties. Additionally, slow economic growth is likely to hinder new entrants into the retail market which may make it difficult for us to fully lease our properties. Tenant defaults and decreased demand for retail space would have an adverse impact on the value of our retail properties and our results of operations.

We anticipate that our properties will consist primarily of retail properties. Our performance, therefore, is linked to the market for retail space generally.

As of December 31, 2012, we owned 21 properties, each of which is a retail center and the majority of which have multiple tenants. The market for retail space has been and in the future could be adversely affected by weaknesses in the national, regional and local economies, the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies, consolidation in the retail sector, excess amounts of retail space in a number of markets and competition for tenants with other shopping centers in our markets. Customer traffic to these shopping areas may be adversely affected by the closing of stores in the same shopping center, or by a reduction in traffic to such stores resulting from a regional economic downturn, a general downturn in the local area where our store is located, or a decline in the desirability of the shopping environment of a particular shopping center. Such a reduction in customer traffic could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our retail tenants face competition from numerous retail channels, which may reduce our profitability and ability to pay distributions.

Retailers at our current retail properties and at any retail property we may acquire in the future face continued competition from discount or value retailers, factory outlet centers, wholesale clubs, mail order catalogues and operators, television shopping networks and shopping via the Internet. Such competition could adversely affect our tenants and, consequently, our revenues and funds available for distribution.

Retail conditions may adversely affect our base rent and subsequently, our income.

Some of our leases may provide for base rent plus contractual base rent increases. A number of our retail leases may also include a percentage rent clause for additional rent above the base amount based upon a specified percentage of the sales our tenants generate. Under those leases which contain percentage rent clauses, our revenue from tenants may increase as the sales of our tenants increase. Generally, retailers face declining revenues during downturns in the economy. As a result, the portion of our revenue which we may derive from percentage rent leases could decline upon a general economic downturn.

Our revenue will be impacted by the success and economic viability of our anchor retail tenants. Our reliance on single or significant tenants in certain buildings may decrease our ability to lease vacated space and adversely affect the returns on your investment.

In the retail sector, a tenant occupying all or a large portion of the gross leasable area of a retail center, commonly referred to as an “anchor tenant,” may become insolvent, may suffer a downturn in business, or may decide not to renew its lease. Any of these events at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future would result in a reduction or cessation in rental payments to us and would adversely affect our financial condition. A lease termination by an anchor tenant at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future could result in lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants whose leases may permit cancellation or rent reduction if another tenant’s lease is terminated. In such event, we may be unable to re-lease the vacated space. Similarly, the leases of some anchor tenants may permit the anchor tenant to transfer its lease to another retailer. The transfer of a lease to a new anchor tenant could cause customer traffic in the retail center to decrease and thereby reduce the income generated by that retail center. A lease transfer to a new anchor tenant could also allow other tenants to make reduced rental payments or to terminate their leases. In the event that we are unable to re-lease vacated space at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future to a new anchor tenant, we may incur additional expenses in order to re-model the space to be able to re-lease the space to more than one tenant.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant may adversely impact our operations and our ability to pay distributions.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a number of smaller tenants at one of our properties or any retail property we may acquire in the future may have an adverse impact on our income and our ability to pay distributions. Generally, under bankruptcy law, a debtor tenant has 120 days to exercise the option of assuming or rejecting the obligations under any unexpired lease for nonresidential real property, which period may be extended once by the bankruptcy court. If the tenant assumes its lease, the tenant must cure all defaults under the lease and may be required to provide adequate assurance of its future performance under the lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, we will have a claim against the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. Although rent owing for the period between filing for bankruptcy and rejection of the lease may be afforded administrative expense priority and paid in full, pre-bankruptcy arrears and amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be afforded general unsecured claim status (absent collateral securing the claim). Moreover, amounts owing under the remaining term of the lease will be capped. Other than equity and subordinated claims, general unsecured claims are the last claims paid in a bankruptcy and therefore funds may not be available to pay such claims in full.

Risks Associated with Real Estate-Related Loans and Other Real Estate-Related Assets

Disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could adversely impact the commercial mortgage market as well as the market for debt-related investments generally, which could hinder our ability to implement our business strategy and generate returns for our stockholders.

As part of our investment strategy, we may invest in real estate-related loans, real estate-related debt securities and other real estate-related investments. The returns available to investors in these investments are determined by: (1) the supply and demand for such investments and (2) the existence of a market for such investments, which includes the ability to sell or finance such investments. During periods of volatility, the number of investors participating in the market may change at an accelerated pace. As liquidity or “demand” increases, the returns available to investors will decrease. Conversely, a lack of liquidity will cause the returns available to investors to increase. In recent years, concerns pertaining to the deterioration of credit in the residential mortgage market have expanded to almost all areas of the debt capital markets including corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and commercial real estate mortgages and loans. Future instability may interfere with the successful implementation of our business strategy.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, our mortgage loans may be affected by unfavorable real estate market conditions, which could decrease the value of those loans and the return on your investment.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, we will be at risk of defaults by the borrowers on those mortgage loans. These defaults may be caused by many conditions beyond our control, including interest rate levels and local and other economic conditions affecting real estate values. We will not know whether the values of the properties securing our mortgage loans will remain at the levels existing on the dates of origination of those mortgage loans. If the values of the underlying properties drop, our risk will increase because of the lower value of the security associated with such loans.

If we make or invest in mortgage loans, our mortgage loans will be subject to interest rate fluctuations that could reduce our returns as compared to market interest rates and reduce the value of the mortgage loans in the event we sell them; accordingly, the value of your investment would be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.

If we invest in fixed-rate, long-term mortgage loans and interest rates rise, the mortgage loans could yield a return that is lower than then-current market rates. If interest rates decrease, we will be adversely affected to the extent that mortgage loans are prepaid because we may not be able to make new loans at the higher interest rate. If we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates decrease, our revenues will also decrease. Finally, if we invest in variable-rate loans and interest rates increase, the value of the loans we own at such time would decrease. For these reasons, if we invest in mortgage loans, our returns on those loans and the value of your investment will be subject to fluctuations in interest rates.

The CMBS and CDOs in which we may invest are subject to several types of risks.

We may invest in commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, which are bonds which evidence interests in, or are secured by, a single commercial mortgage loan or a pool of commercial mortgage loans. Collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs, are a type of debt obligation that are backed by commercial real estate assets, such as CMBS, commercial mortgage loans, B-notes, or mezzanine paper. Accordingly, the mortgage backed securities we invest in are subject to all the risks of the underlying mortgage loans.

In a rising interest rate environment, the value of CMBS and CDOs may be adversely affected when payments on underlying mortgages do not occur as anticipated, resulting in the extension of the security’s effective maturity and the related increase in interest rate sensitivity of a longer-term instrument. The value of CMBS and CDOs may also change due to shifts in the market’s perception of issuers and regulatory or tax changes adversely affecting the mortgage securities markets as a whole. In addition, CMBS and CDOs are subject to the credit risk associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties. In certain instances, third party guarantees or other forms of credit support can reduce the credit risk.

CMBS and CDOs are also subject to several risks created through the securitization process. Subordinate CMBS and CDOs are paid interest only to the extent that there are funds available to make payments. To the extent the collateral pool includes a large percentage of delinquent loans, there is a risk that interest payment on subordinate CMBS and CDOs will not be fully paid. Subordinate securities of CMBS and CDOs are also subject to greater credit risk than those CMBS and CDOs that are more highly rated.

The mezzanine loans in which we may invest would involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income-producing real properties.

We may invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying real property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity owning the real property, the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the real property or other assets. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long-term senior mortgage lending secured by income-producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan-to-value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the real property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

Risks Associated With Debt Financing

We are currently in default under our credit facility with KeyBank National Association.

On December 17, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with KeyBank and certain other lenders, which we collectively refer to as the “lenders,” to establish a revolving credit facility, or the KeyBank credit facility. As of December 31, 2012, we had approximately $38,438,000 of outstanding indebtedness under the Key Bank credit facility. In January 2013, we became aware of a number of events of default under the KeyBank credit facility relating to our failure to use the net proceeds from our sale of our shares in our public offering and the sale of our assets to repay our borrowings under the KeyBank credit facility as required by the KeyBank credit facility and our failure to satisfy certain financial covenants under the KeyBank credit facility, which we collectively refer to as the “existing events of default.” Due to the existing events of default, which have not been cured or waived by KeyBank or the other lenders, KeyBank and the other lenders became entitled to exercise all of their rights and remedies as creditors under the KeyBank credit facility and applicable law. We, our operating partnership, certain subsidiaries of our operating partnership which are borrowers under the KeyBank credit facility, which we collectively refer to as the “borrowers,” and KeyBank, as lender and agent for the other lenders, are in the process of finalizing a forbearance agreement which will amend the terms of the the KeyBank credit facility and provide for certain additional agreements with respect to the existing events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the proposed forbearance agreement, KeyBank and the other lenders will agree to forbear the exercise of their rights and remedies with respect to the existing events of default until the earliest to occur of (1) July 31, 2013, (2) our default under or breach of any of the representations or covenants under the forbearance agreement or (3) the date any additional events of defaults (other than the existing events of default) under the KeyBank credit facility occurs or becomes known to KeyBank or any other lender, which we refer to as the “forbearance expiration date.” Upon the forbearance expiration date, all forbearances, deferrals and indulgences granted by the lenders pursuant to the forbearance agreement will automatically terminate. We expect to execute the forbearance agreement in April 2013; however, there is no guarantee that we will enter into the forbearance agreement on the terms currently contemplated, or at all.

In the event that we breach any term of the forbearance agreement or the KeyBank credit facility, KeyBank and the other lenders will be entitled to enforce, without further notice of any kind, any and all remedies available to them as creditors at law, in equity, or pursuant to the KeyBank credit facility or any other agreement. These remedies include, but are not limited to (1) declaring all amounts outstanding under the KeyBank credit facility immediately due and payable in full and (2) commencing actions to foreclose upon the lenders’ liens and security interests in the properties which secure our obligations under the KeyBank credit facility. If the lenders exercise any of their available remedies upon our breach of the forbearance agreement, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to acquire additional properties and other real estate-related assets and make distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

Restrictions imposed by our loan agreements may limit our ability to execute our business strategy and increase the risk of default under our debt obligations.

We are a party to loan agreements that contain a variety of restrictive covenants. These covenants include requirements to maintain certain financial ratios, requirements to maintain compliance with applicable laws and regulations and significant restrictions on our ability (and the ability of our subsidiaries) to, among other things:

These covenants increase the risk that we will default under our loan agreements. As discussed above, we are currently in default under our credit facility with KeyBank as a result of our failure to comply with certain covenants. If an event of default occurs under any of our loan agreements, all amounts outstanding under those agreements could be declared immediately due and payable. If all or a portion of our debt were accelerated, we may not have access to sufficient funds or other assets to pay the amounts due. In addition, our default on indebtedness secured by our properties may result in foreclosure actions initiated by lenders and our loss of the property securing the loan that is in default. Any acceleration of our outstanding indebtedness or foreclosure actions on our properties due to an event of default would adversely impact our financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

Disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could also adversely affect our ability to secure debt financing on attractive terms and the values of investments we make.

The capital and credit markets experienced extreme volatility and disruption in recent years. Liquidity in the global credit market has been severely contracted by these market disruptions, making it costly to obtain new lines of credit or refinance existing debt. We have, and expect to continue to, finance our investments in part with debt. As a result of the recent turmoil in the credit markets, we may not be able to obtain debt financing on attractive terms or at all. If the current debt market environment persists, we may be required to modify our investment strategy in order to optimize our portfolio performance.

We will incur mortgage indebtedness and other borrowings, which may increase our business risks, could hinder our ability to make distributions and could decrease the value of your investment.

We have, and may in the future, obtain lines of credit and long-term financing that may be secured by our real properties and other assets. Under our charter, we are prohibited from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets. Net assets for purposes of this calculation are defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts or other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. Generally speaking, the preceding calculation is expected to approximate 75% of the aggregate cost of our investments before non-cash reserves and depreciation. Our charter allows us to borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with justification for such excess. As of December 31, 2011, we exceeded the 300% limit due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were acquired with the acquisition of our properties. Because these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and because our overall indebtedness was less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2011, this excess borrowing has been approved by our independent directors. As of December 31, 2012, our aggregate borrowings exceeded 300% of the value of our net assets due to the exclusion from total assets of intangible assets that were acquired with the acquisition of our properties. Because these intangible assets were part of the purchase price and because our overall indebtedness was less than 75% of the book value of our assets at December 31, 2012, the excess over the borrowing limitation has been approved by our independent directors. Also, we may incur mortgage debt and pledge some or all of our investments as security for that debt to obtain funds to acquire additional investments or for working capital. We may also borrow funds as necessary or advisable to ensure we maintain our REIT tax qualification, including the requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to our stockholders (computed without regard to the distribution paid deduction and excluding net capital gains). Furthermore, we may borrow if we otherwise deem it necessary or advisable to ensure that we maintain our qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

High debt levels will cause us to incur higher interest charges, which would result in higher debt service payments and could be accompanied by restrictive covenants. If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from a property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to stockholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default, thus reducing the value of your investment. For tax purposes, a foreclosure on any of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage. If the outstanding balance of the debt secured by the mortgage exceeds our tax basis in the property, we will recognize taxable income on foreclosure, but we would not receive any cash proceeds. If any mortgage contains cross collateralization or cross default provisions, a default on a single property could affect multiple properties. If any of our properties are foreclosed upon due to a default, our ability to pay cash distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

Instability in the debt markets may make it more difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make to our stockholders.

If mortgage debt is unavailable on reasonable terms as a result of increased interest rates or other factors, we may not be able to finance the initial purchase of properties. In addition, if we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us, or could result in the foreclosure of such properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing securities or by borrowing more money.

Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and negatively impact our operating results.

InterestAdvisory Agreement, we pay on our debt obligations will reduce cash available for distributions. If we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. If we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments at times which may not permit realization ofadvisor the maximum return on such investments.

Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage a property, discontinue insurance coverage, or replace our advisor. In addition, loan documents may limit our ability to replace a property’s property manager or terminate certain operating or lease agreements related to a property. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

Our derivative financial instruments that we may use to hedge against interest rate fluctuations may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates and could reduce the overall returns on your investment.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging transactions will not result in losses. In addition, the use of such instruments may reduce the overall return on our investments. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income test.

Federal Income Tax Risks

Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.

We made an election to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009. Our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. The complexity of these provisions and of the applicable income tax regulations that have been promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code is greater in the case of a REIT that holds its assets through a partnership, as we do. Moreover, no assurance can be given that legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification.

If we were to fail to qualify as a REIT for any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we lose our REIT status. Losing our REIT status would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders because of the additional tax liability. In addition, distributions to stockholders would no longer be deductible in computing our taxable income and we would no longer be required to make distributions. To the extent that distributions had been made in anticipation of our qualifying as a REIT, we might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments to pay the applicable corporate income tax. In addition, although we intend to operate in a manner intended to qualify as a REIT, it is possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause our board of directors to recommend that we revoke our REIT election.

We believe that our operating partnership will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a partnership and not as an association or a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation. To minimize the risk that our operating partnership will be considered a “publicly traded partnership” as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, we have placed certain transfer restrictions on the transfer or redemption of the partnership units in our operating partnership. If the Internal Revenue Service were successfully to determine that our operating partnership should properly be treated as a corporation, our operating partnership would be required to pay federal income tax at corporate rates on its net income, its partners would be treated as stockholders of our operating partnership and distributions to partners would constitute distributions that would not be deductible in computing our operating partnership’s taxable income. In addition, we could fail to qualify as a REIT, with the resulting consequencesfees described above.

To qualify as a REIT we must meet annual distribution requirements, which may result in us distributing amounts that may otherwise be used for our operations.

To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our real estate investment income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions we pay with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of (1) 85% of our ordinary income, (2) 95% of our capital gain net income and (3) 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on investments in real estate assets and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds or sell assets to fund these distributions. If we fund distributions through borrowings, then we will have to repay debt using money we could have otherwise used to acquire properties resulting in our ownership of fewer real estate assets. If we sell assets or use offering proceeds to pay distributions, we also will have fewer investments. Fewer investments may impact our ability to generate future cash flows from operations and, therefore, reduce your overall return. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income taxation on the earnings that we distribute, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.

Recharacterization of sale-leaseback transactions may cause us to lose our REIT status.

We may purchase real properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties. We cannot guarantee that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge our characterization of any sale-leaseback transactions. In the event that any such sale-leaseback transaction is challenged and recharacterized as a financing transaction or loan for federal income tax purposes, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the REIT qualification “asset tests” or the “income tests” and, consequently, lose our REIT status effective with the year of recharacterization. Alternatively, the amount of our REIT taxable income could be recalculated which might also cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement for a taxable year.

You may have current tax liability on distributions if you elect to reinvest in shares of our common stock.

If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received a cash distribution equal to the fair market value of the stock received pursuant to the plan. For Federal income tax purposes, you will be taxed on this amount in the same manner as if you have received cash; namely, to the extent that we have current or accumulated earnings and profits, you will have ordinary taxable income. As a result, unless you are a tax-exempt entity, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the common stock received.

Sales of our properties at gains are potentially subject to the prohibited transaction tax, which could reduce the return on your investment.

Our ability to dispose of property during the first few years following acquisition is restricted to a substantial extent as a result of our REIT status. Under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding prohibited transactions by REITs, we may be subject to a 100% tax on any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of any property (other than foreclosure property) we own, directly or through any subsidiary entity, including our operating partnership, but excluding our taxable REIT subsidiaries, that is deemed to be inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business. Whether property is inventory or otherwise held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business depends on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each property. We intend to avoid the 100% prohibited transaction tax by (1) conducting activities that may otherwise be considered prohibited transactions through a taxable REIT subsidiary, (2) conducting our operations in such a manner so that no sale or other disposition of an asset we own, directly or through any subsidiary other than a taxable REIT subsidiary, will be treated as a prohibited transaction, or (3) structuring certain dispositions of our properties to comply with certain safe harbors available under the Internal Revenue Code for properties held at least two years. However, no assurance can be given that any particular property will not be treated as inventory or property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. In the event the Internal Revenue Service challenges our treatment of any sale or disposition of property as not being a prohibited transaction and prevails, the 100% prohibited transaction tax could be assessed against the gain from such transaction which may be significant.

In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Even if we maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal and state taxes. For example, net income from a “prohibited transaction” will be subject to a 100% tax. We may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes applicable to REITs. We may also decide to retain income we earn from the sale or other disposition of our real estate assets and pay income tax directly on such income. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of the companies through which we indirectly own our assets. In addition, our TRSs will be subject to federal income tax and applicable state and local taxes on their net income. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.

Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income.

Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock nor gain from the sale of common stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:below.

Complying with the REIT requirements may cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must continually satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of shares of our common stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at disadvantageous times or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

To qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets, including shares of stock in other REITs, certain mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than governmental securities and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10.0% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10.0% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5.0% of the value of our assets (other than government securities and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer and no more than 20.0% of the value of our total securities can be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we must correct such failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments.

Liquidation of assets may jeopardize our REIT status.

To qualify as a REIT, we must comply with requirements regarding our assets and our sources of income. If we are compelled to liquidate our investments to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, we may be unable to comply with these requirements, ultimately jeopardizing our status as a REIT, or we may be subject to a 100% tax on any resultant gain if we sell assets that are treated as dealer property or inventory.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the federal income tax laws applicable to REITs. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a stockholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in shares of our common stock. We urge you to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in shares of our common stock.

The failure of a mezzanine loan to qualify as a real estate asset could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

We may acquire mezzanine loans. If a mezzanine loan satisfies an Internal Revenue Service safe harbor, it will be treated as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests and interest derived from the mezzanine loan will be treated as qualifying mortgage interest for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test. Although Revenue Procedure 2003-65 provides a safe harbor on which taxpayers may rely, it does not prescribe rules of substantive tax law. We intend to make investments in loans that comply with the various requirements applicable to our qualification as a REIT. We may, however, acquire mezzanine loans that do not meet all of the requirements of this safe harbor. In the event we own a mezzanine loan that does not meet the safe harbor, the Internal Revenue Service could challenge such loan’s treatment as a real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests and could challenge treatment of interest on such loan as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test, and, if such a challenge were sustained, we could fail to qualify as a REIT.

Non U.S. investors may be subject to U.S. federal income taxes on the sale of shares of our common stock if we are unable to qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT.

A non-U.S. person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax on the gain recognized on such disposition. A non-U.S. stockholder generally would not be subject to U.S. federal income tax however, on gain from the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is a “domestically controlled REIT.” A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by a non-U.S. investor on a sale of our common stock would be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the non-U.S. investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5.0% of the value of our outstanding common stock.

If we were considered to actually or constructively pay a “preferential dividend” to certain of our stockholders, our status as a REIT could be adversely affected.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gain), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid. In order for distributions to be counted as satisfying the annual distribution requirements for REITs, and to provide us with a REIT-level tax deduction, the distributions must not be “preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if the distribution is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in our organizational documents. If the IRS were to take the position that we paid a preferential dividend, we may be deemed to have failed the 90% distribution test, and our status as a REIT could be terminated if we were unable to cure such failure.

Retirement Plan Risks

If you fail to meet the fiduciary and other standards under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code as a result of an investment in our stock, you could be subject to criminal and civil penalties.

There are special considerations that apply to employee benefit plans subject to ERISA (such as pension, profit-sharing or 401(k) plans), and other retirement plans or accounts subject to Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code (such as an IRA or Keogh plan) whose assets are being invested in our common stock. If you are investing the assets of such a plan (including assets of an insurance company general account or entity whose assets are considered plan assets under ERISA) or account in our common stock, you should satisfy yourself that:

Failure to satisfy the fiduciary standards of conduct and other applicable requirements of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code may result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties and could subject the fiduciary to equitable remedies. In addition, if an investment in our common stock constitutes a prohibited transaction under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, the fiduciary who authorized or directed the investment may be subject to the imposition of excise taxes with respect to the amount invested.

ITEM  1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Property Portfolio

As of December 31, 2012, our portfolio included 21 retail properties (20 real estate investments and one property held for sale) comprising an aggregate of approximately 2,210,000 leasable square feet of commercial retail space located in 14 states. The total cost of our properties was approximately $289,686,000, exclusive of closing costs. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 there was $210,327,000 and $112,395,000 of indebtedness on our properties, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, approximately 86.7% and 81.4% of our portfolio was leased (based on rentable square footage), with an average remaining lease term of approximately 9.1 and 8.4 years, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, we had invested in 21 retail properties (20 real estate investments and one property held for sale at December 31, 2012) and incurred debt with respect to such properties as set forth below:

Lease Expirations

The following table reflects the timing of tenant lease expirations at our properties2011. There were no asset management fees incurred for leases in effect as of December 31, 2012:

Concentration of Credit Risk

A concentration of credit risk arises in our business when a national or regionally based tenant occupies a substantial amount of space in multiple properties owned by us. In that event, if the tenant suffers a significant downturn in its business, it may become unable to make its contractual rent payments to us, exposing us to potential losses in rental revenue, expense recoveries, and percentage rent. Further, the impact may be magnified if the tenant is renting space in multiple locations. Generally, we do not obtain security from nationally-based or regionally-based tenants in support of their lease obligations to us. We regularly monitor our tenant base to assess potential concentrations of our credit risk. As of December 31, 2012, Publix is our largest tenant and accounted for approximately 99,979 square feet, or approximately 5% of gross leasable area, and approximately $1,040,000, or 4% of our annual minimum rent. No other tenant accounted for over 5% of our annual minimum rent.

2012 Property Acquisitions

Morningside Marketplace

On January 9, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Fontana, California, commonly known as Morningside Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $18,050,000, exclusive of closing costs. The acquisition was financed with (1) proceeds from our initial public offering, (2) approximately $11,953,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility, (3) approximately $1,200,000 in funds borrowed from SMB Equity, LLC, a third party lender, and (4) approximately $1,355,000 in funds borrowed from our sponsor and other affiliates. For more information on the terms of loans from affiliates, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements contain in this Annual Report.

Woodland West Marketplace

On February 3, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Woodland West Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $13,950,000, excluding closing costs. We financed a portion of the purchase price for the Woodland West Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our initial public offering, (2) a loan in the amount of $10,200,000 from JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, or JPM, and (3) a mezzanine loan in the amount of $1,300,000 from JPM.

Ensenada Square

On February 27, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Ensenada Square for an aggregate purchase price of $5,175,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Ensenada Square with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $3,266,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Shops at Turkey Creek

On March 12, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Knoxville, Tennessee, commonly known as the Shops at Turkey Creek, or Turkey Creek, in an UPREIT transaction with our operating partnership, for an aggregate purchase price of $4,300,000 excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for Turkey Creek through the issuance of 144,324 common units in our operating partnership to the sellers of Turkey Creek and approximately $2,520,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Aurora Commons

On March 20, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Aurora, Ohio, commonly known as the Aurora Commons, for an aggregate purchase price of $7,000,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Aurora Commons with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $4,550,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Florissant Marketplace

On May 16, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Florissant, Missouri, commonly known as Florissant Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $15,250,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for the Florissant Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $11,437,500 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Willow Run Shopping Center

On May 18, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Westminster, Colorado, commonly known as Willow Run Shopping Center, for an aggregate purchase price of $11,550,000, excluding closing costs. The acquisition was financed with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $8,662,500 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Bloomingdale Hills

On June 18, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Riverview, Florida, commonly known as Bloomingdale Hills, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,300,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Bloomingdale Hills with cash and subsequently obtained a loan secured by this property from ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company in the amount of $5,600,000.

Visalia Marketplace

On June 25, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Visalia, California, commonly known as Visalia Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $19,000,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for Visalia Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $14,250,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Lahaina Gateway Shopping Center

On November 9, 2012, we acquired a ground lease interest in Lahaina Gateway Shopping Center in Maui, Hawaii for $31,000,000, exclusive of closing cost, or $226.80 per square foot. We financed the purchase with a $29,000,000 loan from DOF IV REIT Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Torchlight Investors. We incurred an acquisition fee to our advisor of $775,000 in this acquisition and third party broker commissions of $1,530,000.

2012 Property Dispositions

ITEM  3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business we may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material pending legal proceedings or proceedings known to be contemplated against us or any of our subsidiaries.

ITEM  4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM  5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Stockholder Information

As of March 22, 2013, we had approximately 10,969,714 shares of our common stock outstanding held by a total of approximately 3,208 stockholders. The number of stockholders is based on the records of our transfer agent, an affiliate of our advisor.

Market Information

Our shares of common stock are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or traded on any over-the-counter market and as a result there is no established public trading market for our common stock. Therefore, there is a risk that a stockholder may not be able to sell our shares of stock at a time or price acceptable to the stockholder. Unless and until our shares are listed on a national securities exchange, it is not expected that a public market for the shares will develop. We do not expect our shares to become listed in the near future, and they may not become listed at all. Our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a transaction to provide liquidity for our stockholders through a listing on an exchange or through any other means until 2015. Our charter does not require our board of directors to pursue a liquidity event by a specific date. Due to the uncertainties of market conditions in the future, we believe setting finite dates for possible, but uncertain, liquidity events may result in actions not necessarily in the best interests or within the expectations of our stockholders. We expect that our board of directors, in the exercise of its fiduciary duty to our stockholders, will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that then-current market conditions are favorable for a liquidity event, and that such a transaction is in the best interests of our stockholders. A liquidity event could include (1) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets either on a portfolio basis or individually followed by a liquidation, in which the net proceeds are distributed to stockholders, (2) a merger or another transaction approved by our board of directors in which our stockholders will receive cash and/or shares of a publicly traded company or (3) a listing of our shares on a national securities exchange. There can be no assurance as to when a suitable transaction will be available.

In order to assist members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, and their associated persons which participated in the offering and sale of our common stock or which may participate in any future offering of our shares of common stock, pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110, we disclose in each Annual Report distributed to our stockholders a per share estimated value of our common stock, the method by which it was developed and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, our advisor must prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our shares of common stock. Although our board of directors has voluntarily determined an estimated value per share of $10.60 as of NovemberOn June 9, 2012, we have determined that for these purposes, the estimated value of our shares shall be deemed to be $10.00 per share as of December 31, 2012. The basis for this valuation is the fact that as of December 31, 2012 we continued to sell shares of our common stock in our initial public offering at the price of $10.00 per share (not taking into consideration purchase price discounts for certain categories of purchasers), and had not changed the price at which shares are acquired under our distribution reinvestment plan or our share redemption program (except with respect to shares redeemed upon death or disability of a stockholder).

Distributions

To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP). Our board of directors may authorize distributions in excess of those required for us to maintain REIT status depending on our financial condition and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

On August 13, 2009, our board of directors approved a monthly cash distribution of $0.05625 per share of common stock. The monthly distribution was contingent upon the closing of our first asset acquisition, which occurred on November 19, 2009, and represented an annualized distribution of $0.675 per share. On May 11, 2010, our board of directors approved an increase in our monthly cash distribution to $0.05833 per share of common stock contingent upon the closing of our acquisition of Waianae Mall, which occurred on June 4, 2010. That monthly distribution amount represents an annualized distribution of $0.70 per share if paid each day over a 365-day period.

Distributions for the month of December 2012 were not approved by our board of directors until January 2013. Effective January 15, 2013, we announced that we will no longer be making monthly distributions. Quarterly distributions will be considered by our board of directors for 2013. As of March 19, 2013, we announced that we will not be making a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

The following table sets forth the distributions declared and paid to our common stockholders and holders of common units in our operating partnership for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

The tax composition of our distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, all cash amounts distributed to stockholders were funded from proceeds from our initial public offering and represented a 100% return of capital to stockholders.

For additional information on our distributions, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Distributions.”

Share Redemption Program

We have adopted a share redemption program that may provide limited liquidity to our stockholders. As discussed below, our share redemption program was suspended effective January 15, 2013. Under the share redemption program, unless shares are redeemed due to the death or disability of a stockholder, we may not redeem shares under the share redemption program unless the holder has held the shares for at least one year. Additionally, the number of shares that may be redeemed during any calendar year is limited to (1) 5.0% of the weighted average of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year and (2) those that could be funded from the net proceeds from the sale of shares under the distribution reinvestment plan in the prior calendar year plus such additional funds as may be reserved for that purpose by our board of directors. Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, amend, suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time if it determines that the funds available to fund the share redemption program are needed for other business or operational purposes or that amendment, suspension or termination of the share redemption program is in the best interest of our stockholders. The share redemption program will terminate if the shares of our common stock are listed on a national securities exchange. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we redeemed approximately 16,279 shares pursuant to our share redemption program, at an average redemption price of $10.00 per share for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $163,000. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we redeemed 113,929 shares pursuant to our share redemption program, at an average redemption price of $9.99 per share for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $1,138,000.

The following table summarizes our share redemptions during the three months ended December 31, 2012:

______________

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Offering Proceeds

On October 16, 2008,In addition to the fees we were initially capitalized with the sale of 22,222 shares of common stockpay to our sponsor for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000 in a private transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.

On November 12, 2009, we granted 5,000 shares of restricted stock to each of our three independent directors, or 15,000 shares of restricted stock in the aggregate,advisor pursuant to our amended and restated independent directors’ compensation plan. On July 22, 2010,Advisory Agreement, we granted 2,500 shares of restricted stock to each of our independent directors, or 7,500 shares of restricted stock in the aggregate, pursuant to our amended and restated independent directors’ compensation plan in connection with the directors’ reelection to our board of directors. On June 9, 2011, we granted, pursuant to our amended and restated independent directors compensation plan in connection with the directors’ reelection to our board of directors, (1) 2,500 shares of restricted stock each to two of our independent directors in connection with their reelection to our board of directors and (2) 5,000 shares of restricted stock to one of our independent director in connection with his initial election to our board of directors. On July 18, 2012, we granted 2,500 shares of restricted stock to each of our three independent directors, or 7,500 shares of restricted stock in the aggregate, pursuant to our amended and restated independent directors’ compensation plan in connection with the directors’ reelection to our board of directors. On October 2, 2012, we granted 5,000 shares of restricted stock to one of our independent directors upon his initial appointment as an independent director pursuant to our amended and restated independent directors’ compensation plan. All of the foregoing shares of restricted stock were issued in transactions exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On August 29, 2012, upon the appointment of Peter K. Kompaniez as our Co-Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Kompaniez’s resignation as a director, our board of directors amended the terms of the restricted stock previously granted to Mr. Kompaniez such that the unvested shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Kompaniez would not be forfeited upon his resignation as a director. The unvested shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Kompaniez will continue to vest pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated independent directors compensation plan. Effective October 9, 2012, Mr. Kompaniez resigned from his position as our Co-Chief Executive Officer and the remainder of his unvested shares of restricted stock was fully vested as of that date.

On October 2, 2012, our board of directors, including all the independent directors, appointed John B. Maier II as an independent director to fill the vacancy on the board of directors created by the resignation of Mr. Kompaniez. On October 2, 2012, we issued 5,000 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Maier, upon his appointment as an independent director by our board of directors.

On October 23, 2008, our operating partnership issued 100 common units at $10.00 per unit toalso reimburse our advisor for a total of $1,000the costs and issued 100 special units at $10.00 per unit to TNP Strategic Retail OP Holdings, LLC for a total of $1,000. Our operating partnership relied on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for the exemption from the registration requirements of these issuances.

On May 26, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of Pinehurst Square, our operating partnership issued 287,472 common units with an aggregate value of approximately $2,587,249 to certain of the sellers of Pinehurst Square pursuant to a private transaction exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. On March 12, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Turkey Creek, our operating partnership issued 144,324 common units with an aggregate value of approximately $1,371,000 to certain of the sellers of Turkey Creek pursuant to a private transaction exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

On August 7, 2009, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-154975) registering our initial public offering of up to $1,100,000,000 in shares of our common stock was declared effective under the Securities Act and we commenced our initial public offering. In our initial public offering, we offered up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock to the public at $10.00 per share and up to $100,000,000 in shares of our common stock to our stockholders pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.50 per share. On February 7, 2013, we terminated our initial public offering and ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan. As of December 31, 2012, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,893,227 shares of our common stock (net of share redemptions), including 365,242 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in aggregate gross offering proceeds of $107,609,000. From the commencement of our initial public offering through the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,969,714shares of our common stock (net of share redemptions), including 391,182 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in aggregate gross offering proceeds of $108,357,000. As of the termination of our initial public offering, we had not sold all of the shares registered for sale in the offering and on February 20, 2013 we deregistered the 88,966,650 shares of our common stock that remainded unsold under the registration statement for our initial public offering, including all shares issuable under our distribution reinvestment plan.

As of December 31, 2012, we had incurred selling commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and other offering costs in our initial public offering in the amounts set forth in the tablesexpenses described below:

From the commencement of our initial public offering through December 31, 2012, the net offering proceeds to us, after deducting the total expenses incurred as described above, were approximately $95,124,000, including net offering proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan of $3,470,000.For the year ended December 31, 2012, the ratio of the cost of raising capital to net proceeds was approximately 12.0%.

As of December 31, 2012, we had used $95,124,000 in net proceeds from our initial public offering, together with debt financing, to invest in 21 retail properties with a total purchase price of $289,686,000. As of December 31, 2012, we had used net offering proceeds to pay $13,032,000 in acquisition expenses.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years then ended should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Annual Report.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Selected Financial Data” above and our accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this Annual Report. Also see “Forward Looking Statements” preceding Part I.

Overview

We were formed as a Maryland corporation on September 18, 2008 to invest in and manage a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located primarily in the Western United States, and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate.

We were initially capitalized with $200,000 which was contributed to us in cash on October 16, 2008, from the sale of 22,222 shares in the aggregate to our sponsor, Thompson National Properties, LLC. Our sponsor, or any affiliate of our sponsor, must maintain this investment while it remains our sponsor.

On November 4, 2008, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, to offer a maximum of up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock to the public at $10.00 per share in our primary offering and up to $100,000,000 in shares of our common stock to our stockholders at $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. On August 7, 2009, the SEC declared our registration statement effective and we commenced our initial public offering. On February 7, 2013 we terminated our initial public offering and ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan.

As of December 31, 2012, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,893,227 shares of our common stock in our initial public offering (net of share redemptions), including 365,242 shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in gross offering proceeds of $107,609,000. From the commencement of our initial public offering through the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we accepted subscriptions for, and issued 10,969,714 shares of our common stock (net of share redemptions), including 391,182 shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in aggregate gross offering proceeds of $108,357,000. As of December 31, 2012, we had redeemed  160,409 shares pursuant to our share redemption program for an aggregate redemption amount of approximately $1,604,000. Due to short-term liquidity issues and defaults under certain of our loan agreements, we suspended our share redemption program, including with respect to redemptions upon death and disability, effective as of January 15, 2013. For more information regarding our share redemption program, see Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer of Equity Securities—Share Redemption Program.”

On June 15, 2012, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a following-on public offering of up to $900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. However, we subsequently determined not to proceed with our contemplated follow-on public offering and on March 1, 2013 we requested that the SEC withdraw the registration statement for our contemplated follow-on public offering, effective immediately. We currently do not expect to commence a follow-on offering.

On November 9, 2012, our board of directors determined an estimated value per share of our common stock of $10.60 as of November 9, 2012. In determining an estimated value of a share of our common stock, our board of directors relied upon information provided by our advisor, appraisal reports prepared by third parties on certain of our properties and other factors our board of directors deemed relevant. Our board of directors also took into account the estimated value of our other assets and liabilities, including a reasonable estimate of the value of our debt obligations. However, our board of directors did not consider certain other factors, such as a liquidity discount, because they did not believe such factors were appropriate or necessary under the circumstances. The estimated value per share determined by our board of directors does not represent the fair value of our assets less liabilities in accordance with GAAP, and such estimated value per share is not a representation, warranty or guarantee that a stockholder would receive this amount if he sold his shares or we consummated a liquidity event. See also, “Risk Factors—Our board of directors determined an estimated per share value of $10.60 for our shares of common stock as of November 9, 2012. You should not rely on the estimated value per share as being an accurate measure of the current value of our shares of common stock.”

To the extent that we acquire additional real estate investments in the future, we intend to continue to focus on investments in income-producing retail properties, primarily located in the Western United States, including neighborhood, community and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties. In addition to investments in real estate directly or through joint ventures, we may also acquire or originate first mortgages or second mortgages, mezzanine loans or other real estate-related loans, which we refer to collectively as “real estate-related loans,” in each case provided that the underlying real estate meets our criteria for direct investment. We may also invest in any other real property or other real estate-related assets that, in the opinion of our board of directors, meets our investment objectives and is in the best interests of our stockholders.

Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, our external advisor, pursuant to an advisory agreement. Our advisor and our property manager, TNP Property Manager, LLC, manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate and real estate-related assets. Our advisor and property manager depend on the capital from our sponsor and fees and other compensation that they receive from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of our assets to conduct their operations. Our sponsor has a limited operating history and, since its inception, has operated at a significant net loss. In addition, our sponsor and its subsidiaries also have substantial secured and unsecured debt obligations coming due in the near term. As a result of our sponsor’s financial condition, our board of directors is actively negotiating with Glenborough, LLC and its affiliates, which we refer to herein as “Glenborough,” to replace our current advisor. Glenborough is a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management, and leasing of high quality commercial properties. Glenborough and its predecessor entities have over three decades of experience in the commercial real estate industry. Our board of directors is engaged in ongoing negotiations regarding the transition to Glenborough as our external advisor and the termination of our current advisory agreement and the property management agreements with respect to our properties. However, any change to our advisor or our property managers will require the consent of a number of our significant lenders. We can give no assurance that we will be able to secure such lender consents or come to terms with Glenborough with respect to the transition.

Effective January 15, 2013, we announced that we will no longer be making monthly distributions. Quarterly distributions will be considered by our board of directors for 2013. As of March 19, 2013, we announced that we will not be making a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

We have elected to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with the year ended December 31, 2009, and therefore we generally are not subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year in which qualification is denied. Failing to qualify as a REIT could materially and adversely affect our net income. As of December 31, 2012, we believe we were in compliance with the REIT requirements.

Market Outlook – Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets

Since 2007 and the emergence of the global economic crisis, there have been persistent concerns regarding the creditworthiness and refinancing capabilities of both corporations and sovereign governments. Economies throughout the world have experienced lingering levels of high unemployment and low levels of consumer and business confidence due to a global downturn in economic activity. While some markets have shown some signs of recovery, concerns remain regarding job growth, income growth and the overall economic health of consumers, businesses and governments. Recent global economic events remain centered on the potential for the default of several European sovereign debt issuers and the impact that such an event would have on the European Union and the rest of the world’s financial markets. During 2011, S&P downgraded the credit rating of the United States to AA+ from AAA. In November 2012, Moody’s downgraded France’s sovereign debt rating to Aa1 from AAA and, in February 2013, Moody’s downgraded the U.K. government debt to Aa1 from AAA as well. The global ratings agencies continue to have a number of western sovereign issuers on negative watch as governments have struggled to resolve their fiscal obligations. These events have led to continued volatility in the capital markets.

2012 Highlights

2012 Property Acquisitions

Morningside Marketplace

On January 9, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Fontana, California, commonly known as Morningside Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $18,050,000, excluding closing costs. The acquisition was financed with (1) proceeds from our public offering, (2) approximately $11,953,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility, (3) approximately $1,200,000 in funds borrowed from SMB Equity, LLC, a third party lender, and (4) approximately $1,355,000 in funds borrowed from our sponsor and other affiliates.

Woodland West Marketplace

On February 3, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Woodland West Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $13,950,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for the Woodland West Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our public offering, (2) a loan in the amount of $10,200,000 from JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, or JPM, and (3) a mezzanine loan in the amount of $1,300,000 from JPM.

Ensenada Square

On February 27, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Arlington, Texas, commonly known as Ensenada Square, for an aggregate purchase price of $5,025,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Ensenada Square with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $3,266,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Shops at Turkey Creek

On March 12, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Knoxville, Tennessee, commonly known as the Shops at Turkey Creek, or Turkey Creek, in an UPREIT transaction with our operating partnership, for an aggregate purchase price of $4,300,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for Turkey Creek through (1) the issuance of 144,324 common units of our operating partnership to the sellers of Turkey Creek and (2) approximately $2,520,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Aurora Commons

On March 20, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Aurora, Ohio, commonly known as the Aurora Commons, for an aggregate purchase price of $7,000,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Aurora Commons with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $4,550,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Florissant Marketplace

On May 16, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Florissant, Missouri, commonly known as Florissant Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $15,250,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for the Florissant Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $11,437,500 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Willow Run Shopping Center

On May 18, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Westminster, Colorado, commonly known as Willow Run Shopping Center, for an aggregate purchase price of $11,550,000, excluding closing costs. The acquisition was financed with (1) proceeds from our public offering and (2) approximately $8,662,500 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Bloomingdale Hills

On June 18, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Riverview, Florida, commonly known as Bloomingdale Hills, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,300,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price of Bloomingdale Hills with cash and subsequently obtained a loan secured by this property from ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company in the amount of $5,600,000.

Visalia Marketplace

On June 25, 2012, we acquired a fee simple interest in a multitenant retail center located in Visalia, California, commonly known as Visalia Marketplace, for an aggregate purchase price of $19,000,000, excluding closing costs. We financed the purchase price for Visalia Marketplace with proceeds from (1) our public offering and (2) approximately $14,250,000 in funds borrowed under our KeyBank credit facility.

Lahaina Gateway Shopping Center

On November 9, 2012, we acquired a ground lease interest in Lahaina Gateway Shopping Center in Maui, Hawaii for $31,000,000, exclusive of closing cost, or $226.80 per square foot. We financed the purchase with a $29,000,000 loan from DOF IV REIT Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Torchlight Investors. We incurred an acquisition fee to our advisor of $775,000 in this acquisition and third party broker commissions of $1,530,000.

2012 Property Dispositions

Review of our Policies2%/25% Guidelines

Our boardAs described above, our advisor and its affiliates are entitled to reimbursement of directors, including our independent directors, has reviewed our policies described in this Annual Reportactual expenses incurred for administrative and determined thatother services provided to us for which they are in the best interest of our stockholders because: (1) they increase the likelihood thatdo not otherwise receive a fee. However, we will be able to successfully maintain and manage our current portfolio of investments and acquire additional income producing properties and other real estate-related investments in the future; (2) our executive officers, directors and affiliates ofnot reimburse our advisor have expertise with the type of properties in our current portfolio; and (3) to the extent that we acquire additional real properties or other real estate related investments in the future, the use of leverage should enable us to acquire assets and earn rental income more quickly, thereby increasing the likelihood of generating income for our stockholders and preserving stockholder capital.

Critical Accounting Policies

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments and assumptions, require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain and because they are important for understanding and evaluating our reported financial results. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues include minimum rents, expense recoveries and percentage rental payments. Minimum rents are recognized on an accrual basis over the terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis when collectability is reasonably assured and the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased property. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, we determine whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or us. When we are the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance that is funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:

For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, we recognize income on a straight-line basis overperiod. Our “net income” for any period is equal to our total revenue less total expenses other than additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves for such period. Operating expenses include all costs and expenses incurred by us under generally accepted accounting principles (including the lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases resultsasset management fee), but excluding organization and offering expenses, selling commissions and dealer manager fees, interest payments, taxes, non-cash expenditures such as depreciation, amortization and bad debt reserves, the subordinated disposition fee, acquisition and advisory fees and expenses and distributions pursuant to our advisor’s subordinated participation interest in reported revenue amounts which differ from those that are contractually due from tenants. If we determine the collectability of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, we limit future recognition to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, establishes an allowance for estimated losses.  our OP.

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an ongoing basis. For straight-line rent amounts, our assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease.

Certain leases contain provisions that require the payment of additional rents based on the respective tenants’ sales volume (contingent or percentage rent) and substantially all contain provisions that require reimbursement of the tenants’ allocable real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs (“CAM”). Revenue based on percentage of tenants’ sales is recognized only after the tenant exceeds its sales breakpoint. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, CAM and insurance is recognized in the period that the applicable costs are incurred in accordance with the lease agreement.

We recognize gains or losses on sales of real estate in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360. Profits are not recognized until (1) a sale has been consummated; (2) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; (3) our receivable, if any, is not subject to future subordination; and (4) we have transferred to the buyer the usual risks and reward of ownership, and we do not have a substantial continuing involvement with the property. The results of operations of income producing properties where we do not have a continuing involvement are presented in the discontinued operations section of our consolidated statements of operations when the property has been classified as held-for-sale or sold.

Real Estate

Real property is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs include those related to acquisition, development and construction, including tenant improvements, interest incurred during development, costs of predevelopment and certain direct and indirect costs of development. Costs related to business combinations are expensed as incurred, and are included in transaction expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

Depreciation and amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Tenant improvement costs recorded as capital assets are depreciated over the shorter of (1) the tenant’s remaining lease term or (2) the life of the improvement.

Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as they are incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized.

Business Combinations

We record the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured at their acquisition-date fair values. The balance of the purchase price is allocated to tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements represent the tangible assets associated with the existing leases valued on a fair value basis at the acquisition date, are classified as an asset under investments in real estate and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms: (1) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with “cost avoidance” of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms generally experienced in markets in which we operate; (2) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurred for the period required to lease the “assumed vacant” property to the occupancy level when purchased; and (3) above or below market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. The value of in-place leases are recorded in acquired lease intangibles, and amortized over the remaining lease term. Above or below market leases are classified in acquired lease intangibles, or in acquired below market lease intangibles, depending on whether the contractual terms are above or below market. Above market leases are amortized as a decrease to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases and below market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining initial lease term and any fixed rate renewal periods, if applicable.

Transaction costs are expensed as incurred and costs that do not meet the definition of a liability at the acquisition date are expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date.Costs incurred in pursuit of targeted properties for acquisitions not yet closed or those determined to no longer be viable have been expensed and are included in transaction expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities require us to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, property-operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions would result in an incorrect valuation of our acquired tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities which would impact the amount of our net income. These allocations also impact the amount of revenue we recognize, depreciation expense and gains or losses recorded on future sales of properties.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of our investments in real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying value of real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability by estimating whether we will recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets through its undiscounted future cash flows and its eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, we do not believe that we will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, we would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the investments in real estate and related intangible assets. Key inputs that we estimate in this analysis include projected rental rates, capital expenditures and property sales capitalization rates. We did not record any impairment loss on our investments in real estate and related intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Assets Held-for-Sale and Discontinued Operations

When certain criteria are met, long-lived assets are classified as held-for-sale and are reported at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value less costs to sell and are no longer depreciated. Discontinued operations is a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held-for-sale and (1) the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction and (2) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, we are required to measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, we are required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

When available, we utilize quoted market prices from independent third-party sources to determine fair value and classify such items as Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require us to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When we determine the market for a financial instrument owned by us to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, we use several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establish a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, we measure fair value using (1) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets or (2) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement, such as the income approach or the market approach.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

We consider the following factors to be indicators of an inactive market: (1) there are few recent transactions, (2) price quotations are not based on current information, (3) price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), (4) indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability, (5) there is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with our estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability, (6) there is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread, (7) there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities, and (8) little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market).

We consider the following factors to be indicators of non-orderly transactions: (1) there was not adequate exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities under current market conditions, (2) there was a usual and customary marketing period, but the seller marketed the asset or liability to a single market participant, (3) the seller is in or near bankruptcy or receivership (that is, distressed), or the seller was required to sell to meet regulatory or legal requirements (that is, forced), and (4) the transaction price is an outlier when compared with other recent transactions for the same or similar assets or liabilities.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes as dividends to its stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially and adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, we believe that we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT. We may also be subject to certain state or local income taxes, or franchise taxes.

We evaluate tax positions taken in the financial statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.

When necessary, deferred income taxes are recognized in certain taxable entities. Deferred income tax is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes). A valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets is provided if all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance is generally included in deferred income tax expense.

Our tax returns remain subject to examination and consequently, the taxability of the distributions is subject to change.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment." ASU No. 2012-02 is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of testing indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, for impairment. It allows companies to perform a "qualitative" assessment to determine whether further impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets is necessary, similar in approach to the goodwill impairment test. ASU No. 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, and earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-10, “Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate.” The amendments in ASU 2011-10 resolve the diversity in practice about whether the guidance in Subtopic 360-20 applies to the derecognition of in substance real estate when the parent ceases to have a controlling financial interest (as described in Subtopic 810-10) in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate because of a default by the subsidiary on its nonrecourse debt. The guidance emphasizes that the accounting for such transactions is based on their substance rather than their form. The amendments in the ASU should be applied on a prospective basis to deconsolidation events occurring after the effective date. Prior periods should not be adjusted even if the reporting entity has continuing involvement with previously derecognized in substance real estate entities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. The adoption and implementation of ASU No. 2011-10 is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU No. 2011-04”). ASU No. 2011-04 updates and further clarifies requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurements. ASU No. 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied prospectively. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 did not have a material impact to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Results of Operations

Our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are not indicative of those expected in future periods as we acquired properties throughout both periods and results for individual years do not reflect a full period of operations for the properties acquired in those years.

As of December 31, 2012, our real estate portfolio included 21 properties acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $289,686,000, plus closing costs. The occupancy rate for our property portfolio was 87% based on 2,209,893 rentable square feet as of December 31, 2012 compared to occupancy of 81% based on 1,131,117 rentable square feet as of December 31, 2011. We funded the acquisition of these properties primarily with a combination of debt and proceeds from our initial public offering. We acquired ten properties during 2012, including five in the first quarter, four in the second quarter and one in the fourth quarter. As these property acquisitions were made throughout the year, our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2012 do not reflect a full year of operations for these properties. In addition, in the fourth quarter of 2012 we entered into an agreement for the sale of the Waianae Mall and the sale of the office building at Aurora Commons. In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets, the operating results for the Waianae Mall and the office building at Aurora Commons are presented within discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations for all periods presented. We expect that all income and expenses related to our continuing operations portfolio will increase in future years as a result of owning the properties acquired in 2012 for a full year.

As of December 31, 2011, our real estate portfolio included 11 properties acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $155,261,000, plus closing costs. We funded the acquisition of these properties primarily with a combination of debt and proceeds from our initial public offering.During 2011, we acquired seven properties. Due to the fact that the first of these properties was acquired on March 20, 2011, our financial statements for the 2011 fiscal year do not reflect a full period of operations for these properties during 2011. Certain amounts within results from operations for 2011 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in 2012. Results of operations for the Waianae Mall and five land parcels sold during 2012 representing portions of the Morningside Marketplace and Osceola Village properties are presented within discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2012 to the year ended December 31, 2011

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Revenue

Revenues increased by $16,851,000 to $23,378,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to revenues of $6,527,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of ten properties during 2012 and having a full year of operating results for properties acquired in 2011. We expect rental income to increase in 2013 as we will have full period operations from existing real estate investments.

Interest income

Interest income decreased by $598,000 to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2012. This decrease was due to the fact that 2011 included interest earned on a mortgage loan acquired on June 29, 2011, which was extinguished in connection with a consent foreclosure in October 2011 that resulted in us owning the underlying property, Constitution Trail, upon the October 2011 foreclosure date.

Operating and maintenance expenses

Operating and maintenance expense increased by $6,063,000 to $8,248,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to operating and maintenance expense of $2,185,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of ten properties since December 31, 2011 and having a full year of operating results for properties acquired in 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2011, our total operating and maintenance expenses reflected a non-recurring reversalexceeded the 2%/25% Guidelines by $268,000. On February 24, 2012, the independent directors unanimously determined the excess amount of asset management fee expense of approximately $213,000 related to the amendment of our advisory agreement to terminate our contingent contractual obligation to pay asset management fees to our advisor. Included intotal operating and maintenance expenses are property management fees paid to an affiliate of our advisor of $1,174,000 and $492,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $1,582,000 to $3,745,000 during thefiscal year ended December 31, 2012 compared to general and administrative2011 was justified because (1) the amounts reflected legitimate operating expenses of $2,163,000necessary for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to the increase in the leveloperation of our investment activitybusiness, (2) we were then in our acquisition and development stage, (3) certain of our properties had not yet stabilized, and (4) we were then continuing to raise capital in our initial public offering but the expenses incurred as a result of our property acquisitions during the year. Generalbeing a public company (including for audit and administrative expenses consisted primarily of corporate level legal fees, audit fees, tax, accounting fees, consulting fees, restricted stock compensation, directors’ fees, directorsservices, director and officersofficer liability insurance and operating expense reimbursementsfees for directors) were disproportionate to our average invested assets and net income and such expenses would benefit us and our stockholders in future periods. The independent directors further resolved, however, that the advisor for salaries and corporate overhead. Operating expenses reimbursementwould be required to our advisor were $958,000 and $459,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $7,585,000 to $10,229,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to depreciation and amortization expenserepay us any portion of $2,644,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily duesuch excess amount to the ten additional properties owned during 2012 plus a full year of depreciation and amortization for properties acquired in 2011. We expect depreciation and amortization expense to increase in 2013extent that, as a result of owning certain of the properties acquired in 2012 for a full year.

Transaction expenses

Transaction expense increased by $3,020,000 to $7,163,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to acquisition expense of $4,143,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was primarily due to the expenses associated with the ten additional property acquisitions since December 31, 2011, compared to seven property acquisitions during 2011. Transaction expenses also included non-refundable deposits, due diligence costs and expenses incurred for acquisitions that we did not complete in the year. There were no pending acquisitions at December 31, 2012.

Interest expense

Interest expense increased by $7,669,000 to $11,856,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to interest expense of $4,187,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in interest expense was attributed to the following: (1) increase in interest expense associated with new acquisition financings completed during 2012; (2) increase in the amortization of deferred financing costs as a result of increased debt levels as a result of acquisitions completed in 2012; (3) a write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $930,000 as a result of certain refinancing of the KeyBank credit facility completed in January and June 2012 into securitized term loans; and (4) payment of prepayment premium and exit fee totaling $238,000 associated with the early payoff of certain debt. We expect our interest expense to increase in 2013 based on our increased average borrowing rates for acquisitions completed in 2012 and the expectation that our refinancing of the maturing debt will likely be at a higher interest rate.

Discontinued operations

Income from discontinued operations decreased by $845,000 to $45,000 during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to income from discontinued operations of $890,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Income from discontinued operations for 2012 included the operating results of Waianae Mall and the office building at Aurora Commons (both were classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012) and operating results of pads at the Morningside Marketplace that were sold in 2012 and the gain on sale of the Wienerschnitzel pad at Morningside Marketplace, offset by a net loss on the sale of the Osceola land parcel. Income from discontinued operations for 2011 included gains on sale of $963,000 related to the sale of three leased real estate pads, including the Popeye pad and the Carl’s Jr. pad at Craig Promenade and the Jack-In-The Box pad at the San Jacinto Esplanade. Included in the sale of the Jack-In-The Box pad at the San Jacinto Esplanade was one unleased land parcel.

Bargain purchase gain

In June, 2011, we acquired three distressed notes secured by the Constitution Trail property and subsequently completed a consent foreclosure on October 21, 2011 and obtained fee simple title to the property. We determined the fair value of the property exceeded its acquisition cost (our basis in the distressed notes) and recorded a bargain purchase gain of $9,617,000. We had no bargain purchase gain during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Net (loss) income

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $17,818,000 compared to a net income of $2,310,000 for the same period in 2011. The net loss is attributed to: (1) an increase in interest expense as a result of the increased level of financing related to acquired properties; (2) non-recurring interest expense associated with the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the refinancing of properties from the line of credit to the term loan entered into in January and June 2012; (3) non-recurring acquisition expense related to the ten acquisitions completed during the year; and (4) an increase in non-cash depreciation and amortization expense as a result of an increase in number of properties. We expect our net loss to decrease in 2013 as certain of the non-recurring expenses would not recur with the reduced acquisition activities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal demand for funds has been for the acquisition of real estate assets, the payment of operating expenses and interest on our outstanding indebtedness and the payment of distributions to our stockholders. On February 7, 2013, as a result of the expiration of our initial public offering, we ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan. Additionally, we filed an application on March 1, 2013 with the SEC to withdraw the registration statement on Form S-11 for our follow-on offering that was initially filed with the SEC on June 15, 2012. As a result of the termination of our initial public offering andAdvisory Agreement, our withdrawalaggregate operating expenses as of such date exceed the registration statement2%/25% Guidelines for our follow-on offering, offering proceeds are not currently available to fund our cash needs, and will not be available until we are able to successfully engage in an offering of our securities. We expect our future cash needs will be funded using cash from operations, future asset sales, debt financing and the proceeds to us from any offering of our securities that we conduct in the future. We also expect our investment activity will be reduced until we are able to engage in an offering of our securities or are able to identify other significant sources of financing. Due to the decrease in capital resources, we have suspended our share redemption program, including redemptions for death and disability, effective January 15, 2013. We intend to reevaluate our ability to resume share redemptions pursuant to our share redemption program after transitioning to a new advisor and addressing our liquidity issues. Our ability to resume share redemptions will be determined by our board of directors based on our liquidity and cash needs.all prior periods.

On August 2, 2012, we, our operating partnership and our advisor entered into an amendment to our amended and restated advisory agreement, effective as of August 7, 2012, which, among other things, establishes a requirement that we maintain at all times a cash reserve of at least $4,000,000 and provides that our advisor may deploy any cash proceeds in excess of the cash reserve for our business pursuant to the terms of the advisory agreement. As a result of the significant cash required to complete the acquisition of Lahaina Gateway on November 9, 2012 and the additional cash required by the mortgage lender for the Lahaina Gateway acquisition for reserves and mandatory principal payments, our cash and cash equivalents have fallen to approximately $1,700,000 at December 31, 2012. Our restricted cash (funds held by the lenders for property taxes, insurance, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capital expenditures, rollover reserves and other financing needs) has increased to $4,283,000 at December 31, 2012. For properties with such lender reserves, we may draw upon such reserves to fund the specific needs for which the funds were established.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

As of December 31, 2012, we owned 21 real estate properties, including one property (Waianae Mall) under contract of sale included in assets held for sale at December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations decreased to $1,527,000 compared to net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations of $4,056,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash used in operating activities consisted primarily of the following:

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Our most significant component of cash used in investing activities involves our expenditures for real estate acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $135,609,000 compared to $95,276,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributed to the acquisition of ten properties during 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $134,155,000 compared to the acquisition of seven properties and three mortgage notes during 2011 for an aggregate purchase price of $93,224,000. In 2012 and 2011, we expended $799,000 and $483,000, respectively, toward improvements, capital expenditures, and leasing costs on our properties. Additionally, we funded $632,000 and $19,000 into the restricted cash accounts held by our lenders for capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Our cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of proceeds from our initial public offering, debt financings and distributions paid to our stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations increased to $130,011,000, compared to net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations of $97,075,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011. The primary components of net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal short-term demand for funds will be for the payment of operating expenses, principal and interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness and the payment of distributions to our stockholders. To date, our cash needs for operations have been covered from cash provided by property operations and the sale of shares of our common stock. Due to the termination of our initial public offering, we intend to fund our short-term operating cash needs from operations. Operating cash flows are expected to increase as operations in our existing portfolio stabilize and efficiencies are gained. Additionally, offering and organization costs associated with our initial public offering will be eliminated due to the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013. Effective January 15, 2013, our monthly distributions have been suspended and our board of directors will evaluate our ability to make quarterly distributions on a quarterly basis based on our other operational cash needs. Our board of directors has determined that quarterly distributions for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 will not be made based on our current liquidity and operational cash needs.

KeyBank Credit Facility

On December 17, 2010, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, TNP SRT Secured Holdings, LLC, or TNP SRT Holdings, entered into a credit agreement with KeyBank and certain other lenders, which we collectively refer to as the “lenders,” to establish a revolving credit facility with an initial maximum aggregate commitment of $35,000,000, or the KeyBank credit facility. The KeyBank credit facility initially consisted of an A tranche, or “Tranche A,” with an initial aggregate commitment of $25 million, and a B tranche, or “Tranche B,” with an initial aggregate commitment of $10 million. Tranche B under the KeyBank credit facility terminated as of June 30, 2011. The aggregate commitment under Tranche A was subsequently increased on multiple occasions and as of December 31, 2012 the aggregate commitment was $45 million. As discussed below, due to our default under the KeyBank credit facility, we expect to enter into a Forbearance Agreement with KeyBank which, among other things, will convert the entire outstanding principal amount under Tranche A into a term loan which is due and payable in full on July 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the KeyBank credit facility had an outstanding balance of $38,438,000. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, we paid down $1,983,000 on the KeyBank credit facility from the net proceeds from the sales of the Waianae Mall in January 2013 and the McDonalds pad at Willow Run in February 2013.

Borrowings under the KeyBank credit facility are secured by (1) pledges by us, our operating partnership, TNP SRT Holdings, and certain subsidiaries of TNP SRT Holdings, of their respective direct and indirect equity ownership interests in, as applicable, any subsidiary of TNP SRT Holdings or us which directly or indirectly owns real property, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, (2) guarantees, granted by us and our operating partnership on a joint and several basis, of the prompt and full payment of all of the obligations under the KeyBank credit facility, (3) a security interest granted in favor of KeyBank with respect to all operating, depository (including, without limitation, a deposit account used to receive subscription payments for the sale of shares in our initial public offering), escrow and security deposit accounts and all cash management services of us, our operating partnership, TNP SRT Holdings and any other borrower under the KeyBank credit facility, and (4) a deed of trust, assignment agreement, security agreement and fixture filing in favor of KeyBank with respect to the San Jacinto Esplanade, Craig Promenade, Willow Run Shopping Center, Visalia Marketplace and Aurora Commons properties.

Under the KeyBank credit facility, we are required to comply with certain restrictive and financial covenants. In January 2013, we became aware of a number of events of default under the KeyBank credit facility relating to, among other things, our failure to use the net proceeds from our sale of our shares in our public offering and the sale of our assets to repay our borrowings under the Keybank credit facility and our failure to satisfy certain financial covenants under the KeyBank credit facility, which we collectively refer to as the “existing events of default.” Due to the existing events of default, which have not been cured or waived by KeyBank or the other lenders, KeyBank and the other lenders became entitled to exercise all of their rights and remedies under the KeyBank credit facility and applicable law.

We, our operating partnership, certain subsidiaries of our operating partnership which are borrowers under the KeyBank credit facility, which we refer to as the “borrowers,” and KeyBank, as lender and agent for the other lenders, are in the process of finalizing a forbearance agreement which will amend the terms of the KeyBank credit facility and provide for certain additional agreements with respect to the existing events of default. Pursuant to the terms of the proposed forbearance agreement, KeyBank and the other lenders will agree to forbear the exercise of their rights and remedies with respect to the existing events of default until the earliest to occur of (1) July 31, 2013, (2) our default under or breach of any of the representations or covenants under the forbearance agreement or (3) the date any additional events of defaults (other than the existing events of default) under the KeyBank credit facility occur or become known to KeyBank or any other lender, which we refer to as the “forbearance expiration date.” Upon the forbearance expiration date, all forbearances, deferrals and indulgences granted by the lenders pursuant to the forbearance agreement will automatically terminate and the lenders will be entitled to enforce, without further notice of any kind, any and all rights and remedies available to them as creditors at law, in equity, or pursuant to the KeyBank credit facility or any other agreement as a result of the existing events of default or any additional events of default which occur or come to light following the date of the forbearance agreement.

The forbearance agreement will convert the entire outstanding principal balance under the KeyBank credit facility, and all interest and other amounts payable under the KeyBank credit facility, which we refer to as the “outstanding loan,” into a term loan which is due and payable in full on July 31, 2013. Pursuant to the forbearance agreement, we, our operating partnership and every other borrower under the KeyBank credit facility must apply 100% of the net proceeds from, among other things, (1) the sale of our shares in our completed public offering or any other sale of securities by us, our operating partnership or any other borrower, (2) the sale or refinancing of any of our properties or other assets, and (3) the collection of insurance or condemnation proceeds due to any damage or destruction of our properties or any condemnation for public use of any of our properties, to the repayment of the outstanding loans. The forbearance agreement provides that all commitments under the KeyBank credit facility will terminate of July 31, 2013 and that, effective as of the date of the forbearance agreement, the lenders have no further obligation whatsoever to advance any additional loans or amounts under the KeyBank credit facility. The forbearance agreement also provides that neither we, our operating partnership or any other borrower under the KeyBank credit facility may, without KeyBank’s prior written consent, incur, assume, guarantee or be or remain liable, contingently or otherwise, with respect to any indebtedness other than the existing indebtedness specified in the forbearance agreement and any refinancing of such existing indebtedness which do not materially modify the terms of such existing indebtedness in a manner adverse to us or the lenders.

Pursuant to the proposed terms of the forbearance agreement we, our operating partnership and all of the borrowers under the KeyBank credit facility will jointly and severally agree to pay to KeyBank (1) any and all out-of-pocket costs or expenses (including legal fees and disbursements) incurred or sustained by the lenders in connection with the preparation of the forbearance agreement and all related matters and (2) from time to time after the occurrence of any default under the forbearance agreement any out-of-pocket costs or expenses (including legal fees and consulting and other similar professional fees and expenses) incurred by the lenders in connection with the preservation of or enforcement of any rights of the lenders under the forbearance agreement and the KeyBank credit facility. In connection with the execution of the forbearance agreement, we also agreed to pay a forbearance fee of $192,000 to KeyBank, with 50% of such fee paid upon the execution of the forbearance agreement and the remaining 50% to be paid upon the earlier of the forbearance expiration date or the date the outstanding loans are repaid in full.

Under the forebearance agreement, we are not permitted to make, without the lender’s consent, certain restricted payments (as defined in the KeyBank credit facility) which includes the payment of distributions that are not required to maintain our REIT status.

We expect to execute the forbearance agreement in April 2013; however, there is no guarantee that we will enter into the forbearance agreement on the terms described above, or at all.

Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a long-term basis, our principal demand for funds will be for real estate and real estate-related investments and the payment of acquisition-related expenses, operating expenses, distributions to stockholders, future redemptions of shares (currently suspended) and interest and principal payments on current and future indebtedness. Generally, we intend to meet cash needs for items other than acquisitions and acquisition-related expenses from our cash flow from operations. Until the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, our cash needs for acquisitions were satisfied from the net proceeds of the public offering and from debt financings. We expect that substantially all cash generated from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after satisfying the operating expenses including interest and principal payments. When market conditions improve, we may consider future public offerings or private placements of equity, as well as additional borrowings. See Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 7 (Notes Payable) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information on the maturity dates and terms of our outstanding indebtedness.

Contractual Commitments and Contingencies

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:

Osceola Village ContingenciesGuaranty Fees

In connection with certain acquisition financings, Anthony W. Thompson, our current Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer and/or our sponsor has executed guaranty agreements to certain parties. As part of the acquisition financing on Osceola Village, we through our subsidiary, granted a lender a profit participation in the property equal to 25% of the net profits received by us uponWaianae Mall, Mr. Thompson guaranteed the sale of the property (the “Profit Participation Payment”). Net profits is calculated as (1) the gross proceeds received by us upon a sale of the property in an arms-length transaction at market rates to third parties less (2) the sum of: (a) principal repaid to the lender out of such sales proceeds at the time of such sale; (b) all bona fide closing costs and similar expenses provided that all such closing costs and similar expenses are paid to third parties, unaffiliated with us including, without limitation, reasonable brokerage fees and reasonable attorneys’ fees paid to third parties, unaffiliated with us and incurredmortgage loan assumed by us in connection with the sale; and (c) a stipulated amount of $3,200,000. If for any reason consummation of such sale has not occurred on or before the scheduled maturity date or any earlier foreclosureacquisition of the underlyingWaianae Mall. In connection with the acquisition of the mortgage loanloans secured by the property,Constitution Trail, we shall be deemedand Mr. Thompson agreed to have sold the property as of the business day immediately preceding the mortgage loan maturity date or the filing date of the foreclosure action, whichever is applicable, for an amount equaljointly and severally guaranty to a stipulated sales price and shall pay the lender the Profit Participation Payment. In the event the underlying mortgage loan is prepaid, we shall also be required to immediately pay the Profit Participation Payment based upon a deemed salefull and prompt payment and performance of the property for a stipulated sales price. Based on the estimated sale price as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we have recorded an accrual for the estimated liabilitycertain obligations under the Profit Participation Payment.  

acquisition loan.

Additionally, in connection with the acquisition financing on Osceola Village, we entered into a Master Lease Agreement (the “Master Lease”) with TNP SRT Osceola Village Master Lessee, LLC, a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (the Master Lessee).OP. Pursuant to the Master Lease TNP SRT Osceola Village leased to Master Lessee the approximately 23,000 square foot portion of Osceola Village which was not leased to third-party tenants as of the closing date (the “Premises”). The Master Lease provides that the Master Lessee will pay TNP SRT Osceola Village a monthly rent in an amount equal to $36,425, provided that such monthly amount will be reduced proportionally for each square foot of space at the premises subsequently leased to third-party tenants pursuant to leases which are reasonably acceptable to the lender and which satisfyAgreement, our sponsor has made certain criteria set forth in the Master Lease (“Approved Leases”). The Master Lease has a seven-year term, subject to earlier expiration upon the earlier to occur of (1) the date on which all available rentable space at the Premises is leased to third-party tenants pursuant to Approved Leases and (2) the date on which the mortgage loan is repaid in full in cash (other than as a result of a credit bid by the lender at a foreclosure sale). The Master Lessee has no right to assign or pledge the Master Lease or to sublet any part of the premises without the prior written consent of TNP SRT Osceola Village and the lender. In connectionguarantees with the acquisition of Osceola Village, TNP SRT Osceola Village obtained a mortgage (the “Osceola Loan”) from American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”). The Master Lease was assigned to ANICO pursuant to the assignment of leases and rents in favor of ANICO entered into by TNP SRT Osceola Village in connection with the Osceola Loan. Pursuantrespect to the Master Lease Agreement.

As consideration for the Master Lessee acknowledgesguaranties outlined above, we entered into reimbursement and agrees that upon any default by TNP SRT Osceola Village under anyfee agreements to provide for up-front payments and annual guaranty fee payments for the duration of the loan documents related to the Osceola Loan, ANICO will be entitled to enforce the assignment of the Master Lease to ANICO and replace TNP SRT Osceola Village under the Master Lease for all purposes.

Constitution Trail Contingency

In connection with the Constitution Trail financing, TNP SRT Constitution Trail, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership (“TNP SRT Constitution Trail”), TNP SRT Constitution Trail Master Lessee, LLC (the “Starplex Master Lessee”), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, and our sponsor, entered into a Master Lease Agreement with respect to a portion of Constitution Trail (the “Starplex Master Lease”). Pursuant to the Starplex Master Lease, TNP SRT Constitution Trail leased to the Starplex Master Lessee an approximately 7.78 acre parcel of land included in the Constitution Trail property, and the approximately 44,064 square foot Starplex Cinemas building located thereon (the “Starplex Premises”). The Starplex Master Lease provides that, in the event that the annual gross sales from the Starplex premises are less than $2,800,000, then thereafter the Starplex Master Lessee will pay TNP SRT Constitution Trail a monthly rent in an amount equal to approximately $62,000 ($749,000 annually), subject to an offset based on any minimum annual rent for the Starplex premises received by TNP SRT Constitution Trail. The Starplex Master Lease will expire upon the earlier to occur of (1) December 31, 2018 and (2) the date on which the Constitution Trail mortgage loan is repaid in full in cash (other than as a result of a credit bid by the lender at a foreclosure sale or refinancing of the Constitution Trail Loan). The Starplex Master Lessee has no right to assign or pledge the Starplex Master Lease or to sublet any part of the Starplex premises without the prior written consent of TNP SRT Constitution Trail and the lender of the mortgage loan.

Limitation on Total Operating Expenses

We reimburse our advisor for all expenses paid or incurred by our advisor in connection with the services provided to us, except that we will not reimburse our advisor for any amount by which our total operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceed the greater of: (1) 2% of our average invested assets, as defined in our charter, and (2) 25% of our net income, as defined in our charter, or the 2/25% Limit, unless a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, our total operating expenses represented approximately 1.6% of our average invested assets, as defined in our charter. Total operating expenses as a ratio of net income is not applicable for the purpose of the 2/25% Limit test as we incurred a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2012, our total operating expenses did not exceed the 2/25% Limit.

Inflation

The majority of our leases at our properties contain inflation protection provisions applicable to reimbursement billings for common area maintenance charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per square foot allowance. We expect to include similar provisions in our future tenant leases designed to protect us from the impact of inflation. Due to the generally long-term nature of these leases, annual rent increases, as well as rents received from acquired leases, may not be sufficient to cover inflation and rent may be below market.

REIT Compliance

To qualify as a REIT for tax purposes, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. We must also meet certain asset and income tests, as well as other requirements. We will monitor the business and transactions that may potentially impact our REIT status. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which our REIT qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders. As of December 31, 2012, we believe we are in compliance with the REIT qualification requirements.

Distributions

Prior to the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we funded all of our cash distributions from proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock. Following the termination of our initial public offering, we may not be able to pay distributions from our cash from operations, in which case distributions may be paid in part from debt financing or from other sources. Distributions declared and distributions paid to our common stockholders and holders of common units in our operating partnership for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

The tax composition of our distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

On January 18, 2013, we declared and paid a distribution for December 2012 in the aggregate amount of $636,000, of which $390,000 was paid in cash and $246,000 was paid through our distribution reinvestment plan in the form of additional shares issued on or about January 18, 2013.guarantee periods. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, cash amounts distributed to stockholders were funded from proceeds from our initial public offering and represented a 100% return of capital to stockholders.

Effective January 15, 2013, we announced that we will no longer be making monthly distributions. Quarterly distributions will be considered by our board of directors for 2013. As of March 19, 2013, we announced that we will not be making a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations

Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as funds from operations, or FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a real estate investment trust, or REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property but including asset impairment writedowns, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s policy described above.

The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or as requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. However, FFO, and MFFO as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.

Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start-up entities may also experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that public, non-listed REITs, like us, are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after acquisition activity ceases. Our board of directors will determine to pursue a liquidity event when it believes that the then-current market conditions are favorable. However, our board of directors does not anticipate evaluating a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national exchange, a merger or sale of our company or another similar transaction) until 2015. Thus, as a limited life REIT we will not continuously purchase assets and will have a limited life.

Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association, or IPA, an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a public, non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.

We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA’s Guideline 2010-01,Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations, or the Practice Guideline, issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; nonrecurring impairments of real estate-related investments (i.e., infrequent or unusual, not reasonably likely to recur in the ordinary course of business); mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; nonrecurring gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, nonrecurring unrealized gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized. While we rely on our advisor for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, we do not retain an outside consultant to review all our hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such non-recurring gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of on-going operations.

Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA’s Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to noncontrolling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by us. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. In the event that proceeds from our initial public offering are not available to fund our reimbursement of acquisition fees and expenses incurred by our advisor, such fees and expenses will need to be reimbursed to our advisor from other sources, including debt, operational earnings or cash flow, net proceeds from the sale of properties, or from ancillary cash flows. The acquisition of properties, and the corresponding acquisition fees and expenses, is the key operational feature of our business plan to generate operational income and cash flow to fund distributions to our stockholders. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives, impairment charges and gains and losses from dispositions of assets as non-recurring items or items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, and which are not reflective of on-going operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance. In particular, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indications exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of MFFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges.

Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO in order to evaluate our performance against other public, non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate MFFO allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to public, non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.

Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance to that of other public, non-listed REITs, although it should be noted that not all public, non-listed REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way, so comparisons with other public, non-listed REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as our initial public offering where the price of a share of common stock was a stated value and there was no regular net asset value determinations during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. MFFO is not a useful measure in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining MFFO.

We also present MFFO, calculated as discussed above, adjusted for the non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs and non-recurring non-cash allocations of organizational costs, or adjusted MFFO. We opted to use substantial short-term and medium-term borrowings to acquire properties in advance of raising equity proceeds under our initial public offering in order to more quickly build a larger and more diversified portfolio. Noncash interest expense represents amortization of financing costs paid to secure short-term and medium-term borrowings. GAAP requires these items to be recognized over the remaining term of the respective debt instrument, which may not correlate with the ongoing operations of our real estate portfolio. Management believes that the measure resulting from an adjustment to MFFO for noncash interest expense, provides supplemental information that allows for better comparability of reporting periods. We also believe that adjusted MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering and acquisition stages are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in significant acquisition and short-term borrowing activities. Like FFO and MFFO, adjusted MFFO is not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. Further, adjusted MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance.

Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO, MFFO or Adjusted MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and in response to such standardization we may have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO, MFFO or Adjusted MFFO accordingly.

Our calculation of FFO, MFFO and Adjusted MFFO and the reconciliation to net income (loss) is presented in the following table for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial conditions, changes in financial conditions, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Subsequent Events

Termination of Initial Public Offering

We commenced our initial public offering of up to $1,100,000,000 in shares of common stock on August 7, 2009. On February 7, 2013, we terminated our initial public offering and ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan. On February 20, 2013, we deregistered the 88,966,650 shares of our common stock that remained unsold under the registration statement on Form S-11(File No. 333-154975) for our initial public offering, including all shares registered for issuance under our distribution reinvestment plan. As of the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,969,714 shares of our common stock (net of share redemptions), including 391,182 shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, resulting in aggregate gross offering proceeds of $108,357,000.

Withdrawal of Follow-on Offering

On June 15, 2012, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the SEC to register a following-on public offering of up to $900,000,000 in shares of our common stock. However, we subsequently determined not to proceed with the registration and sale of our common stock in our follow-on public offering. On March 1, 2013, we requested that the SEC withdraw the registration statement for our contemplated follow-on public offering, effective immediately. The registration statement for our follow-on public offering was never declared effective by the SEC and we sold no shares pursuant to the registration statement. We currently do not expect to commence a follow-on public offering.

Property Dispositions

On January 22, 2013, we sold the Waianae Mall in Waianae, Hawaii to an unaffiliated buyer for a sales price of $29,763,000. The final sales price of $29,763,000 represented a reduction of approximately $737,000 from the original sales price of $30,500,000 related to buyer credits for tenant improvement and repair allowances and property conditions. We originally acquired the Waianae Mall in June 2010 for $25,688,000. The mortgage on the Waianae Mall with an outstanding balance of $19,716,933 was assumed by the buyer in connection with the sale. We utilized a portion of the sale proceeds to repay unpaid broker commissions of $1,530,000 related to the Lahaina Gateway acquisition and to pay broker commissions of $595,000 related to the sale of Waianae Mall. Net sale proceeds received by us were $7,089,000. We incurred a disposition fee to our advisor of $893,000 in connection with the sale, which was paid outside of closing.

On February 19, 2013, we completed the sale of the McDonalds pad at the Willow Run property to the lessee, McDonalds Real Estate Company, for a sale price of $1,050,000. Net proceeds from the sale of $983,000 were used to pay down the outstanding balance under our KeyBank credit facility. A disposition fee of $31,500 was paid at closing to our advisor in connection with the sale.

Loan Defaults

Under the KeyBank credit facility, we are required to comply with certain restrictive and financial covenants. In January 2013, we became aware of a number of events of default under the KeyBank credit facility relating to, among other things, our failure to use the net proceeds from our sale of our shares in our public offering and the sale of our assets to repay our borrowings under the KeyBank credit facility as required by the KeyBank credit facility and our failure to satisfy certain financial covenants under the KeyBank credit facility. We, our operating partnership, certain subsidiaries of our operating partnership which are borrowers under the KeyBank credit facility and KeyBank are in the progress of finalizing a forbearance agreement which will amend the terms of the KeyBank credit facility and provide for certain additional agreements with respect to the existing events of default. We expect to execute the forbearance agreement in April 2013; however, there is no guarantee that we will enter into the forbearance agreement on the terms currently contemplated, or at all. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 7 (Notes Payable) to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information on the terms of the forbearance agreement.

On January 14, 2013, we received a letter of default from DOF IV REIT Holdings, LLC, or DOF, in connection with the certain Guaranty of Recourse Obligations by us and Anthony W. Thompson, our Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, for the benefit of DOF, pursuant to which we and Mr. Thompson guaranteed the obligations of TNP SRT Lahaina Gateway, LLC, or TNP SRT Lahaina, an indirect subsidiary of our operating partnership, under the loan from DOF to TNP SRT Lahaina in the aggregate principal amount of $29,000,000, which we refer to as the “Lahaina loan.” The letter of default from DOF stated that two events of default existed under the Lahaina loan as a result of the failure of TNP SRT Lahaina to (1) pay a deposit into a rollover account, and (2) pay two mandatory principal payments. DOF requested payment of the missed deposit into the rollover account, the two overdue mandatory principal payments, and late payment charges and default interest in the aggregate amount of $1,280,516 by January 18, 2013. On January 22, 2013, we used a portion of the proceeds from our sale of the Waianae Mall (discussed above) to pay the entire amount requested by DOF and cure the events of default under the Lahaina loan.

Distributions

On January 18, 2013, we declared and paid distributions for the month of December 2012 in the aggregate amount of $636,000, of which $390,000 was paid in cash and $246,000 was paid through our distribution reinvestment plan in the form of additional shares issued on or about January 18, 2013. Total dividends paid to holders of common units of our operating partnership for the same period were $25,000.

Effective January 15, 2013, we announced that we will no longer be making monthly distributions. Quarterly distributions will be considered by our board of directors for 2013. As of March 19, 2013, we announced that we will not be making a quarterly distribution for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

Suspension of Share Redemption Program

Due to short-term liquidity issues and defaults under certain of our loan agreements, we suspended our share redemption program, including with respect to redemptions upon death and disability, effective as of January 15, 2013. We intend to reevaluate our capacity to resume share redemptions after transitioning to a new advisor and addressing our liquidity issues. However, there is no guarantee that we will resume share redemptions in the short term or at all. 

In February 2013, we made an arrangement with the estate of a deceased stockholder, whose shares of common stock were accepted for redemption in the fourth quarter of 2012, to redeem all such stockholder’s shares for an aggregate purchase price of $636,000, payable in three equal installments during 2013.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a change in interest rates. We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of long-term debt used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and expand our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Market fluctuations in real estate financing may affect the availability and cost of funds needed to expand our investment portfolio. In addition, restrictions upon the availability of real estate financing or high interest rates for real estate loans could adversely affect our ability to dispose of real estate in the future. We will seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our assets. The market risk associated with interest-rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. With regard to variable rate financing, our advisor will assess our interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities. Our advisor maintains risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow risk attributable to both our outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as our potential offsetting hedge positions. While this hedging strategy will be designed to minimize the impact on our net income and funds from operations from changes in interest rates, the overall returns on your investment may be reduced.

The table below summarizes the book values and the weighted-average interest rates of our notes payable and KeyBank credit facility for each category as of December 31, 2012 based on the maturity dates and the notional amounts and average pay rates as of December 31, 2012 based on maturity dates:

We borrow funds and make investments at a combination of fixed and variable rates. Interest rate fluctuations will generally not affect our future cash flows on our fixed rate debt unless such instruments mature or are otherwise terminated. However, interest rate changes will affect the fair value of our fixed rate instruments. At December 31, 2012, the fair value of our fixed rate debt was $152,882,000 and the carrying value of our fixed rate debt was $152,139,000. The fair value estimate of our fixed rate debt was estimated using present value techniques utilizing contractual cash outflows and observable interest rates we would expect to pay for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity if the loans were originated at December 31, 2012. As we expect to hold our fixed rate instruments to maturity and the amounts due under such instruments would be limited to the outstanding principal balance and any accrued and unpaid interest, we do not expect that fluctuations in interest rates, and the resulting change in fair value of our fixed rate instruments, would have a significant impact on our operations.

At December 31, 2012, the fair value and carrying value of our variable rate debt was $38,438,000. Movements in interest rates on our variable rate debt would change our cash flows, but would not significantly affect the fair value of our debt. At December 31, 2012, we were exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on $38,438,000 of variable rate debt outstanding. Our variable rate debt outstanding bears interest at the lesser of (1) the Adjusted LIBOR Rate (Index) as defined in the KeyBank credit facility plus 3.50% per annum, or (2) the maximum rate of interest permitted by applicable law. The Index is further subject to a floor rate of 2.00%, resulting in a fully indexed floor rate of 5.50%. We estimate that a hypothetical increase or decrease in interest rates of 100 basis points would have no impact on future earnings as the floor rate would continue to be in effect. The one month LIBOR rate was 0.21% at December 31, 2012.

The weighted-average interest rates of our fixed rate debt and variable rate debt at December 31, 2012 were 6.78% and 5.50%, respectively. The weighted-average interest rate represents the actual interest rate in effect at December 31, 2012 (consisting of the contractual interest rate).

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and supplementary data can be found beginning on Page F-1 of this Annual Report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM  9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report, our management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

In assessing our internal control over financial reporting, our management considered that during the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we identified a significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting related to our making certain prepayments of acquisition fees and financing fees to our advisor prior to the closing of the transactions. In each case, the fees were ultimately earned by the advisor. We have taken steps to develop additional internal controls and procedures to remediate this significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting, including: (a) the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer who is independent from the advisor and has no involvement with the advisor’s affairs; (b) dual approval for payments of non-operating expenditures, including payments to our advisor for transactions, for which one of the approvers must be an independent director; and (c) the formation of a special committee of the board of directors comprised entirely of our independent directors. The special committee has the maximum power delegable to a committee of the board of directors under Maryland law and has the authority to (1) engage its own financial and legal advisors; (2) execute, deliver and file or to cause to be executed, delivered and filed all agreements, documents and instruments in our name and on our behalf as the special committee may deem necessary, convenient or appropriate; (3) expend money on our behalf; and (4) to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, keep private from our board of directors and our officers the minutes of its meetings and other matters.

Based on its assessment, our management concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursurant to the rules of the SEC applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Except as discussed above, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM  9B. OTHER INFORMATION

On October 30, 2012, and effective as of November 3, 2012, we entered into an employment arrangement with Dee R. Balch, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Pursuant to the employment arrangement, we will pay Ms. Balch an annual base salary of $190,000. On April 30, 2013, Ms. Balch will receive (1) a retention bonus equal to 20% of her base annual salary provided she remains employed by us as of that date, and (2) a performance bonus equal to up to 30% of her base annual salary based upon her individual performance as assessed by our Audit Committee. Ms. Balch will also be entitled to receive additional bonus compensation in the future, subject to the terms of a separate employment agreement with us. Ms. Balch will accrue five weeks of paid time off per year and effective December 1, 2012 will be eligible to participate in our employee benefits plan. The terms of Ms. Balch’s employment arrangement is at-will and may be terminated at any time and for any reason.

Prior to her employment by us, Ms. Balch was compensated by our sponsor for the services she provided to us as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Effective November 2, 2012, Ms. Balch’s employment with our sponsor was terminated.

PART III

ITEM  10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

ITEM  11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

ITEM  12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER                     MATTERS

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

ITEM  13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

ITEM  14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC with respect to our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

PART IV

ITEM  15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) List of Documents Filed.

Schedule III—Real Estate Assets and Accumulated Depreciation is set forth beginning on page S-1 hereof.

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and therefore have been omitted.

(b) See (a) 3 above.

(c) See (a) 2 above.

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc.: 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule III listed in Item 15(a). These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ McGladrey LLP

Irvine, California

March 29, 2012