UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K



(Mark One)

(Mark One)
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2013

January 30, 2016

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from   to 

Commission File No. 1-10299

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

(Exact name of Registrantregistrant as specified in its charter)

 
New York 13-3513936
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 
112 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10120
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 720-3700

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YesAct.Yeso Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes.Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.xo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

   
Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yeso Nox

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at March 18, 2013:150,129,128
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant computed by reference to the closing price as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, July 27, 2012, was approximately:$4,025,401,193*
 
The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of March 21, 2016:  136,094,471 
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant computed by reference to the closing price as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, August 1, 2015, was approximately: $7,523,772,438

*For purposes of this calculation only (a) all directors plus three executive officers and owners of five percent or more of the Registrant are deemed to be affiliates of the Registrant and (b) shares deemed to be “held” by such persons include only outstanding shares of the Registrant’s voting stock with respect to which such persons had, on such date, voting or investment power.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 15, 2013:18, 2016: Parts III and IV.


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
PART I
 

Item 11.

Business

  1 

Item 1A1A.

Risk Factors

  2 

Item 1B1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

  9 

Item 22.

Properties

  9 

Item 33.

Legal Proceedings

  9 

Item 44.

Mine Safety Disclosures

  9 
PART II
 

Item 55.

Market for the Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  11 

Item 66.

Selected Financial Data

  13 

Item 77.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  14 

Item 7A7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  3334 

Item 88.

Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  3334 

Item 99.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  73 

Item 9A9A.

Controls and Procedures

  73 

Item 9B9B.

Other Information

  75 
PART III
 

Item 1010.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  75 

Item 1111.

Executive Compensation

  75 

Item 1212.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  75 

Item 1313.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  75 

Item 1414.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

  75 
PART IV
 

Item 1515.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  76 
SIGNATURES77
INDEX OF EXHIBITS78


 
 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.Business

Item 1.  Business

General

Foot Locker, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of New York in 1989, is a leading global retailer of athletically inspired shoes and apparel, operating 3,3353,383 primarily mall-based stores in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand as of February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. Foot Locker, Inc. and its subsidiaries hereafter are referred to as the “Registrant,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us.” Information regarding the business is contained under the “Business Overview” section in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

The Company maintains a website on the Internet atwww.footlocker-inc.com. The Company’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge through this website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC by clicking on the “SEC Filings” link. The Corporate Governance section of the Company’s corporate website contains the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Committee Charters, and the Company’s Code of Business Conduct for directors, officers and employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer. Copies of these documents may also be obtained free of charge upon written request to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at 112 West 34th Street, New York, N.Y. 10120. Effective May 1, 2016 the address to use will be 330 West 34th Street, New York, N.Y. 10001. The Company intends to promptly disclose amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and waivers of the Code for directors and executive officers on the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s corporate website.

Information Regarding Business Segments and Geographic Areas

The financial information concerning business segments, divisions, and geographic areas is contained under the “Business Overview” and “Segment Information” sections in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Information regarding sales, operating results, and identifiable assets of the Company by business segment and by geographic area is contained under theSegment Information note in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The service marks, trade names, and trademarks appearing in this report (except for Nike, Inc. and Alshaya Trading Co. W.L.L.) are owned by Foot Locker, Inc. or its subsidiaries.

Employees

The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries had 13,35614,944 full-time and 27,28332,081 part-time employees at February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. The Company considers employee relations to be satisfactory.

Competition

Financial information concerning competition is contained under the “Business Risk” section in theFinancial Instruments and Risk Management note in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Merchandise Purchases

Financial information concerning merchandise purchases is contained under the “Liquidity” section in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and under the “Business Risk” section in theFinancial Instruments and Risk Management note in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1A.Risk Factors

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) that are not historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements regarding our expected financial position, business and financing plans found in “Item 1. Business” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Please also see “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially due to the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Annual Report, including those discussed below. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know about or that we currently consider to be insignificant may also affect our business operations and financial performance.

Our inability to implement our strategic long range plan may adversely affect our future results.

Our ability to successfully implement and execute our long rangelong-range plan is dependent on many factors. Our strategies may require significant capital investment and management attention, which may result in the diversion of these resources from our core business and other business issues and opportunities. Additionally, any new initiative is subject to certain risks including customer acceptance of our products and renovated store design,designs, competition, product differentiation, and the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel. If we cannot successfully execute our strategic growth initiatives or if the long rangelong-range plan does not adequately address the challenges or opportunities we face, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, failure to meet market expectations, particularly with respect to sales, operating margins, and earnings per share, would likely result in volatility in the market value of our stock.

The businesses in which we operate are highly competitive.

The retail athletic footwear and apparel business is highly competitive with relatively low barriers to entry. competitive.

Our athletic footwear and apparel operations compete primarily with athletic footwear specialty stores, sporting goods stores, and superstores, department stores, discount stores, traditional shoe stores, and mass merchandisers, and Internet retailers, many of which are units of national or regional chains that have significant financial and marketing resources. The principal competitive factors in our markets are selection of merchandise, reputation, store location, price, quality, advertising, price, and customer service. Our success also depends on our ability to differentiate ourselves from our competitors with respect to shopping convenience, a quality merchandise assortment of available merchandise and superior customer service. We cannot assure that we will continue to be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Our expansion into markets served by our competitors, and entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Although we sell merchandise via the Internet, a significant shift in customer buying patterns to purchasing athletic footwear, athletic apparel, and sporting goods via the Internet could have a material adverse effect on our business results. In addition, all of our significant vendorssuppliers operate retail stores and distribute products directly through the Internet and others may follow. Some vendors operate retail stores and some have indicated that further retail stores and venues will open. Should this continue to occur, and if our customers decide to purchase directly from our vendors,suppliers, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The industry in which we operate is dependent upon fashion trends, customer preferences, product innovations, and other fashion-related factors.

The athletic footwear and apparel industry is subject to changing fashion trends and customer preferences. In addition, retailers in the athletic industry rely on their suppliers to maintain innovation in the products they develop. We cannot guarantee that our merchandise selection will accurately reflect customer preferences when it is offered for sale or that we will be able to identify and respond quickly to fashion changes, particularly given the long lead times for ordering much of our merchandise from vendors.suppliers. A substantial portion of our highest margin sales are to young males (ages 12 – 25), many of whom we believe purchase athletic footwear and athletic and licensed apparel as a fashion statement and are frequent purchasers. Any shiftOur failure to anticipate, identify or react appropriately in a timely manner to changes in fashion trends that would make athletic footwear or athletic and licensed apparel less attractive to these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we do not successfully manage our inventory levels, our operating results will be adversely affected.

We must maintain sufficient inventory levels to operate our business successfully. However, we also must guard against accumulating excess inventory. For example, we order the bulkmost of our athletic footwear four to six months prior to delivery to our stores. If we fail to anticipate accurately either the market for the merchandise in our stores or our customers’ purchasing habits, we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of excess or slow moving inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

A change in the relationship with any of our key vendorssuppliers or the unavailability of our key products at competitive prices could affect our financial health.

Our business is dependent to a significant degree upon our ability to obtain exclusive product and the ability to purchase brand-name merchandise at competitive prices from a limited number of vendors.suppliers. In addition, our vendorssuppliers provide volume discounts, cooperative advertising, and markdown allowances, as well as the ability to negotiate returns of excess or unneeded merchandise. We cannot be certain that such assistance fromterms with our vendorssuppliers will continue in the future.

The Company purchased approximately 8690 percent of its merchandise in 20122015 from its top five vendorssuppliers and expects to continue to obtain a significant percentage of its athletic product from these vendorssuppliers in future periods. Approximately 6572 percent of all merchandise purchased in 2015 was purchased from one vendorsupplier — Nike, Inc. (“Nike”). Each of our operating divisions is highly dependent on Nike; they individually purchased 4855 to 7782 percent of their merchandise from Nike. Merchandise that is high profile and in high demand is allocated by our vendorssuppliers based upon their internal criteria. Although we have generally been able to purchase sufficient quantities of this merchandise in the past, we cannot be certain that our vendorssuppliers will continue to allocate sufficient amounts of such merchandise to us in the future. Our inability to obtain merchandise in a timely manner from major suppliers (particularly Nike) as a result of business decisions by our suppliers or any disruption in the supply chain could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Because of our strong dependence on Nike, any adverse development in Nike’s reputation, financial condition or results of operations or the inability of Nike to develop and manufacture products that appeal to our target customers could also have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We cannot be certain that we will be able to acquire merchandise at competitive prices or on competitive terms in the future.

These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We depend on mall traffic and our ability to secure suitable store locations.

Our stores in the United States and Canada are located primarily in enclosed regional and neighborhood malls. Our sales are dependent, in part, on the volume of mall traffic. Mall traffic may be adversely affected by, among other factors, economic downturns, the closing of anchor department stores and/or specialty stores, and a decline in the popularity of mall shopping among our target customers. Further, any terrorist act, natural disaster, or public health or safety concern that decreases the level of mall traffic, or that affects our ability to open and operate stores in affected areas, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

To take advantage of customer traffic and the shopping preferences of our customers, we need to maintain or acquire stores in desirable locations such as in regional and neighborhood malls anchored by major department stores. We cannot be certain that desirable mall locations will continue to be available.available at favorable rates. Some traditional enclosed malls are experiencing significantly lower levels of customer traffic, driven by the overall poor economic conditions as well as the closure of certain mall anchor tenants.

Several large landlords dominate the ownership of prime malls, particularly in the United States, Canada, and Canada,Australia, and because of our dependence upon these landlords for a substantial number of our locations, any significant erosion of their financial condition or our relationships with these landlords would negatively affect our ability to obtain and retain store locations. Additionally, further landlord consolidation may negatively affect our ability to negotiate favorable lease terms.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We may experience fluctuations in and cyclicality of our comparable-store sales results.

Our comparable-store sales have fluctuated significantly in the past, on both an annual and a quarterly basis, and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future. A variety of factors affect our comparable-store sales results, including, among others, fashion trends, product innovation, the highly competitive retail store sales environment, economic conditions, timing of promotional events, changes in our merchandise mix, calendar shifts of holiday periods, supply chain disruptions, and weather conditions. Many of our products particularly high-end athletic footwear and athletic and licensed apparel, represent discretionary purchases. Accordingly, customer demand for these products could decline in a recession or if our customers develop other priorities for their discretionary spending. These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our operations may be adversely affected by economicEconomic or political conditions in other countries.countries, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and tax rates may adversely affect our operations.

A significant portion of our sales and operating income for 20122015 was attributable to our operations in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. As a result, our business is subject to the risks associated with doing business outside of the United States such as foreignlocal customer product preferences, political unrest, disruptions or delays in shipments, changes in economic conditions in countries in which we operate, foreign currency fluctuations, real estate costs, and labor and employment practices in non-U.S. jurisdictions that may differ significantly from those that prevail in the United States.

In addition, because we and our suppliers have a substantial amount of our products manufactured in foreign countries, our ability to obtain sufficient quantities of merchandise on favorable terms may be affected by governmental regulations, trade restrictions, and economic, labor, and other conditions in the countries from which our suppliers obtain their product.

Fluctuations in the value of the euro may affect the value of our European earnings when translated into U.S. dollars. Similarly our earnings in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand may be affected by the value of currencies when translated into U.S. dollars. Our operating results may be adversely affected by significant changes in these foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar. For the most part, our international subsidiaries transact in their functional currency, other than in the U.K., whose inventory purchases are denominated in euro, which could result in foreign currency transaction gains or losses.

Our products are subject to import and excise duties and/or sales or value-added taxes in many jurisdictions. Fluctuations in tax rates and duties and changes in tax legislation or regulation could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in the value of the euro may affect the value of our European earnings when translated into U.S. dollars. Although we enter into forward foreign exchange contracts and option contracts to reduce the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, our operations may be adversely affected by significant changes in the foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.

Macroeconomic developments may adversely affect our business.

Our performance is subject to global economic conditions and the related impact on consumer spending levels. Continued uncertainty about global economic conditions poses a risk as consumers and businesses postpone spending in response to tighter credit, unemployment, negative financial news, and/or declines in income or asset values, which could have a material negative effect on demand for our products.

As a retailer that is dependent upon consumer discretionary spending, our results of operations are sensitive to changes in macroeconomic conditions. Our customers may have less money for discretionary purchases as a result of job losses, foreclosures, bankruptcies, increased fuel and energy costs, higher interest rates, higher taxes, reduced access to credit, and lower home prices.values. There is also a risk that if negative economic conditions persist for a long period of time or worsen, consumers may make long-lasting reductions to their discretionary purchasing behavior. These and other economic factors could adversely affect demand for our products, and services andwhich could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Instability in the financial markets may adversely affect our business.

Past disruptionsAny instability in the U.S. and global financial markets could result in diminished credit and equity markets made it difficult for many businesses to obtain financing on acceptable terms.availability. Although we currently have a revolving credit agreement in place until January 27, 2017, and do not have any borrowings under it (otherother than amounts used for standby letters of credit),credit, we do not have any borrowings under it, tightening of credit markets could make it more difficult for us to access funds, refinance our existing indebtedness, enter into agreements for new indebtedness or obtain funding through the issuance of the Company’s securities. Additionally, our borrowing costs can be affected by independent rating agencies’ ratings, which are based largely on our performance as measured by credit metrics, including lease-adjusted leverage ratios.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

We rely on a few key vendorssuppliers for a majority of our merchandise purchases (including a significant portion from one key vendor)supplier). The inability of key suppliers to access liquidity, or the insolvency of key suppliers, could lead to their failure to deliver merchandise to us. Our inability to obtain merchandise in a timely manner from major suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Material changes in the market value of the securities we hold may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

At February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $928$1,021 million. The majority of our investments were short-term deposits in highly-rated banking institutions. As of February 2, 2013, we had $543January 30, 2016, $608 million of our cash and cash equivalents were held in foreign jurisdictions. We regularly monitor our counterparty credit risk and mitigate our exposure by making short-term investments only in highly-rated institutions and by limiting the amount we invest in any one institution. We continually monitor the creditworthiness of our counterparties. At February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, almost all of the investments were in institutions rated A or better from a major credit rating agency. Despite those ratings, it is possible that the value or liquidity of our investments may decline due to any number of factors, including general market conditions and bank-specific credit issues.

Our U.S. pension plan trust holds assets totaling $585$544 million at February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. The fair values of these assets held in the trust are compared to the plan’s projected benefit obligation to determine the pension funding liability. We attempt to mitigate funding risk through asset diversification, and we regularly monitor investment risk of our portfolio through quarterly investment portfolio reviews and periodic asset and liability studies. Despite these measures, it is possible that the value of our portfolio may decline in the future due to any number of factors, including general market conditions and credit issues. Such declines could have an impact on the funded status of our pension plansplan and future funding requirements.

If our long-lived assets, goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we may need to record significant non-cash impairment charges.

We review our long-lived assets, goodwill and other intangible assets when events indicate that the carrying value of such assets may be impaired. Goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. We determine fair value basedAs of January 30, 2016, we had $156 million of goodwill; this asset is not amortized but is subject to an impairment test, which consists of either a qualitative assessment on a combinationreporting unit level, or a two-step impairment test, if necessary. The determination of a discounted cash flow approach and market-based approach. If an impairment triggercharges is identified, the carrying value is compared to its estimated fair value and provisions for impairment are recorded as appropriate. Impairment losses are significantly affected by estimates of future operating cash flows and estimates of fair value. Our estimates of future operating cash flows are identified from our strategic long-range plans, which are based upon our experience, knowledge, and expectations; however, these estimates can be affected by factors such factors as our future operating results, future store profitability, and future economic conditions, all of which can be difficult to predict accurately. Any significant deterioration in macroeconomic conditions could affect the fair value of our long-lived assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets and could result in future impairment charges, which would adversely affect our results of operations.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our financial results may be adversely affected by tax rates or exposure to additional tax liabilities.

We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. Our provision for income taxes is based on a jurisdictional mix of earnings, statutory rates, and enacted tax rules, including transfer pricing. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in evaluating our tax positions on a worldwide basis. Our effective tax rate could be adversely affected by a number of factors, including shifts in the mix of pretax results by tax jurisdiction, changes in tax laws or related interpretations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and tax assessments and related interest and penalties resulting from income tax audits.

A substantial portion of our cash and investments is invested outside of the U.S.United States. As we plan to permanently reinvest our foreign earnings outside the U.S.,United States, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have not provided for U.S. federal and state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes that may result from future remittances of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Recent proposals to reform U.S. tax rules may result in a reduction or elimination of the deferral of U.S. income tax on our foreign earnings, which could adversely affect our effective tax rate. Any of these changes could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The effects of natural disasters, terrorism, acts of war, and public health issues may adversely affect our business.

Natural disasters, including earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and tornados may affect store and distribution center operations. In addition, acts of terrorism, acts of war, and military action both in the United States and abroad can have a significant effect on economic conditions and may negatively affect our ability to purchase merchandise from vendorssuppliers for sale to our customers. Public health issues, such as flu or other pandemics, whether occurring in the United States or abroad, could disrupt our operations and result in a significant part of our workforce being unable to operate or maintain our infrastructure or perform other tasks necessary to conduct our business. Additionally, public health issues may disrupt, the operations of our suppliers, our operations, our customers, or have an adverse effect on, our suppliers’ operations, our operations, our customers, or customer demand. Our ability to mitigate the adverse impact of these events depends, in part, upon the effectiveness of our disaster preparedness and response planning as well as business continuity planning. However, we cannot be certain that our plans will be adequate or implemented properly in the event of an actual disaster. We may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our locations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any significant declines in public safety or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects that affect customer spending habits could have a material adverse effect on customer purchases of our products.

Manufacturer compliance with our social compliance program requirements.

We require our independent manufacturers to comply with our policies and procedures, which cover many areas including labor, health and safety, and environmental standards. We monitor compliance with our policies and procedures using internal resources, as well as third-party monitoring firms. Although we monitor their compliance with these policies and procedures, we do not control the manufacturers or their practices. Any failure of our independent manufacturers to comply with our policies and procedures or local laws in the country of manufacture could disrupt the shipment of merchandise to us, force us to locate alternate manufacturing sources, reduce demand for our merchandise, or damage our reputation.

Complications in our distribution centers and other factors affecting the distribution of merchandise may affect our business.

We operate fourmultiple distribution centers worldwide to support our businesses. In addition to the distribution centers that we operate, we have third-party arrangements to support our operations in the U.S.,United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. If complications arise with any facility or if any facility is severely damaged or destroyed, our other distribution centers may not be ableunable to support the resulting additional distribution demands. ThisWe may be affected by disruptions in the global transportation network such as a port strike, weather conditions, work stoppages or other labor unrest. These factors may adversely affect our ability to deliver inventory on a timely basis. We depend upon third-party carriers for shipment of a significant amount of merchandise. An interruption in service by these carriers for any reason could cause temporary disruptions in our business, a loss of sales and profits, and other material adverse effects.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our freight cost is affected by changes in fuel prices through surcharges. Increases in fuel prices and surcharges, andamong other factors, may increase freight costs and thereby increase our cost of sales. We enter into diesel fuel forward and option contracts to mitigate a portion of the risk associated with the variability caused by these surcharges.

Disruptions,We are subject to technology risks including failures, or security breaches, of our information technology infrastructureand cybersecurity risks which could harm our business.business, damage our reputation, and increase our costs in an effort to protect against such risks.

Information technology is a critically important part of our business operations. We depend on information systems to process transactions, make operational decisions, manage inventory, operate our websites, purchase, sell and ship goods on a timely basis, and maintain cost-efficient operations. There is a risk that we could experience a business interruption, theft of information, or reputational damage as a result of a cyber-attack, such as an infiltration of a data center or data leakage of confidential information, either internally or at our third-party providers. We may experience operational problems with our information systems as a result of system failures, system implementation issues, viruses, malicious hackers, sabotage, or other causes.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our business involves the storage and transmission of customers’ personal information, such asincluding consumer preferences and credit card information. In an effort to enhance the security of our customers’ credit card information, during 2015 we implemented an encryption and tokenization platform for certain credit card transactions, whereby no credit card data is stored in our internal systems, with plans to expand this platform to the entire Company. We invest in industry-standard security technology to protect the Company’sdata stored by the Company, including our data and business processes, against the risk of data security breaches and cyber-attacks. Our data security management program includes identity, trust, vulnerability and threat management business processes, as well as enforcement of standard data protection policies such as Payment Card Industry compliance. We measure our data security effectiveness through industry accepted methods and remediate critical findings. Additionally, we certify our major technology suppliers and any outsourced services through accepted security certification measures. We maintain and routinely test backup systems and disaster recovery, along with external network security penetration testing by an independent third party as part of our business continuity preparedness. We also maintain an IT Security Incident Response Plan and routinely perform a table-top exercise with key IT and business stakeholders.

While we believe that our security technology and processes are adequatefollow leading practices in preventingthe prevention of security breaches and in reducing cyber securitythe mitigation of cybersecurity risks, given the ever-increasing abilities of those intent on breaching cyber securitycybersecurity measures and given the necessity of our reliance on the security and other effortsprocedures of third-party vendors, the total security effort at any point in time may not be completely effective, and anyeffective. Any such security breaches and cyber incidents could adversely affect our business. Failure of our systems, including failures due to cyber-attacks that would prevent the ability of systems to function as intended, could cause transaction errors, loss of customers and sales, and could have negative consequences to us, our employees, and those with whom we do business. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss, or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information by us could also severely damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and liability, increase operating costs associated with remediation, and harm our business. While we carry insurance that would mitigate the losses, to an extent, such insurance may be insufficient to compensate us for potentially significant losses.

Risks associated with digital operations.

Our digital operations are subject to numerous risks, including risks related to the failure of the computer systems that operate our websites and mobile sites and their related support systems, computer viruses, telecommunications failures, denial of service attacks, and similar disruptions. Also, we may require additional capital in the future to sustain or grow our digital commerce. Business risks related to digital commerce include risks associated with the need to keep pace with rapid technological change, Internet securitycybersecurity risks, risks of system failure or inadequacy, governmental regulation, and legal uncertainties with respect to the Internet regulatory compliance, and collection of sales or other taxes by additional states or foreign jurisdictions. If any of these risks materializes, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.


The technology enablement of omni-channel in our business is complex and involves the development of a new digital platform and a new order management system in order to enhance the complete customer experience.

TABLE OF CONTENTSWe continue to invest in initiatives geared towards delivering a high-quality, coordinated shopping experience online, in-stores, and on mobile, which requires substantial investment in technology, information systems, employees, and management time and resources. Our omni-channel retailing efforts include the integration and implementation of new technology, software and processes to be able to fulfill orders from any point within our system of stores and distribution centers, which is extremely complex and may not meet customer expectations for timely and accurate deliveries. These efforts involve substantial risk, including risk of implementation delays, cost overruns, technology interruptions, supply and distribution delays, and other issues that can affect the successful implementation and operation of our omni-channel initiatives. If our omni-channel initiatives are not successful, or we do not realize the return on our omni-channel investments that we anticipate, our financial performance and future growth could be materially adversely affected.

Our reliance on key management, store and field associates.management.

Future performance will depend upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate our executive and senior management team, as well as store personnelteam. Our executive and field management.senior management teams have substantial experience and expertise in our business and have made significant contributions to our recent growth and success. Our success future performance


TABLE OF CONTENTS

depends to a significant extent both upon the continued services of our current executive and senior management team, as well as our ability to attract, hire, motivate, and retain additional qualified management in the future. Competition

While we feel that we have adequate succession planning and executive development programs, competition for key executives in the retail industry is intense, and our operations could be adversely affected if we cannot retain and attract qualified executives.

Risks associated with attracting and retain qualifiedretaining store and field associates.

Many of the store and field associates are in entry level or part-time positions withwhich, historically, have had high rates of turnover. Our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation, and changing demographics. If we are unable to attract and retain quality associates, our ability to meet our growth goals or to sustain expected levels of profitability may be compromised. In addition, a largeOur ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation, overtime regulations, and changing demographics.

Changes in employment laws or regulation could harm our performance.

Various foreign and domestic labor laws govern our relationship with our employees and affect our operating costs. These laws include minimum wage requirements, overtime pay, paid time off, work scheduling, healthcare reform and the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, works council requirements, and union membership. A number of our retail employees are paid the prevailing minimum wage, which if increased would negativelyfactors could adversely affect our profitability.

We face risks arisingoperating results, including additional government-imposed increases in minimum wages, overtime pay, paid leaves of absence and mandated health benefits, and changing regulations from recent activity by the National Labor Relations Board in the United States.

The National Labor Relations Board continually considers changes to labor regulations, many of which could significantly affect the nature of labor relations in the U.S. and how union elections and contract negotiations are conducted. In 2011, the National Labor Relations Board’s definition of a bargaining unit changed, making it possible for smaller groups of employees to organize labor unions. Furthermore, recent regulations may streamline the election process, shortening the time between the filing of a petition and an election being held. These regulations and recent decisions could impose more labor relations requirements and union activity on our business conducted in the United States, thereby potentially increasing our costs, which could negatively affect our profitability.

Health care reform could adversely affect our business.

In 2010, Congress enacted comprehensive health care reform legislation which, amongor other things, includes guaranteed coverage requirements, eliminates pre-existing condition exclusions and annual and lifetime maximum limits, restricts the extent to which policies can be rescinded, and imposes new and significant taxes on health insurers and health care benefits. Due to the breadth and complexity of the health reform legislation and the large number of eligible employees who currently choose not to participate in our plans, it is difficult to predict the overall effect of the statute and related regulations on our business over the coming years. Eligible employees who currently choose not to participate in our healthcare plans may find it more advantageous to do so when recent changes to healthcare laws in the United States become effective in 2014. Such changes include tax penalties to persons for not obtaining healthcare coverage and being ineligible for certain healthcare subsidies if an employee is eligible for healthcare coverage under an employer's plan. If a large number of current eligible employees, who currently choose not to participate in our plans, choose to enroll when, or after, the law becomes effective, it may significantly increase our healthcare coverage costs and negatively affect our financial results.agencies.

Legislative or regulatory initiatives related to global warming/climate change concerns may negatively affect our business.

There has been an increasing focus and significant debate on global climate change, recently, including increased attention from regulatory agencies and legislative bodies globally.bodies. This increased focus may lead to new initiatives directed at regulating an as-yet unspecified array of environmental matters. Legislative, regulatory, or other efforts in the United States to combat climate change could result in future increases in taxes or in the cost of transportation and utilities, which could decrease our operating profits and could necessitate future additional investments in facilities and equipment. We are unable to predict the potential effects that any such future environmental initiatives may have on our business.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

We may be adversely affected by regulatory and litigation developments.

We are exposed to the risk that federal or state legislation may negatively impact our operations. Changes in federal or state wage requirements, employee rights, health care, social welfare or entitlement programs, such as health insurance, paid leave programs, or other changes in workplace regulation could increase our cost of doing business or otherwise adversely affect our operations. Additionally, we are regularly involved in various litigation matters, including class actions and patent infringement claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business. Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.

We operate in many different jurisdictions and we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, which is broader in scope than the FCPA, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws. Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot be assured that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our continued expansion outside the U.S.,United States, including in developing countries, could increase the risk of suchFCPA violations in the future. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Failure to fully comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could negatively affect our business, the price of our common stock and market confidence in our reported financial information.information, and the price of our common stock.

We continue to document, test, and monitor our internal controls over financial reporting in order to satisfy all of the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; however, we cannot be assured that our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting will prove to be completely adequate in the future. Failure to fully comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could negatively affect our business, the price of our common stock, and market confidence in our reported financial information.information, and the price of our common stock.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.Properties

Item 2.  Properties

The properties of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries consist of land, leased stores, administrative facilities, and distribution centers. Gross square footage and total selling area for the Athletic Stores segment at the end of 20122015 were approximately 12.3212.92 and 7.267.58 million square feet, respectively. These properties, which are primarily leased, are located in the United States and its territories, Canada, various European countries, Australia, and New Zealand.

The Company currently operates fourfive distribution centers, of which two are owned and twothree are leased, occupying an aggregate of 2.52.9 million square feet. Three of the four distribution centers are located in the United States, one in Germany, and one is in the Netherlands. The location in Germany relates to the central warehouse distribution centers for the Runners Point Group store locations, as well as a distribution center for its direct-to-customer business. During 2014, we opened a new distribution center in Germany which provides us with increased capacity that will enable us to support the planned growth of both the store and direct-to-customer businesses. This larger distribution center also allowed us to consolidate the previous two locations in Germany during 2015.

We also own a cross-dock and manufacturing facility and operate a leased manufacturing facilitywarehouse in the U.S.,United States, both of which we operate in support of our Team Edition apparel business.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

Information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings is contained in theLegal Proceedings note under “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Information with respect to Executive Officers of the Company, as of April 1, 2013,March 24, 2016, is set forth below:

 
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Ken C. HicksRichard A. Johnson
Executive Vice President and Chief OperatingExecutive Officer North America Richard A. JohnsonStephen D. Jacobs
Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer InternationalLewis P. Kimble
Executive Vice President — Operations Support Robert W. McHugh
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Lauren B. Peters
Senior Vice President General Counsel and SecretaryChief Human Resources Officer Gary M. BahlerPaulette R. Alviti
Senior Vice President — Real Estate Jeffrey L. Berk
Senior Vice President and Chief Information OfficerPeter D. Brown
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer Giovanna Cipriano
Senior Vice President, — Human ResourcesGeneral Counsel and Secretary Laurie J. PetrucciSheilagh M. Clarke
Senior Vice President and Chief Information OfficerPawan Verma
Vice President, Treasurer and Investor Relations John A. Maurer

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ken C. Hicks,Richard A. Johnson, age 60,58, has served as Chairman of the Board since January 31, 2010 and President and Chief Executive Officer since August 17, 2009.December 1, 2014. Mr. Hicks served as President and Chief Merchandising Officer of J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (“JC Penney”) from 2005 through 2009. He was President and Chief Operating Officer of Stores and Merchandise Operations of JC Penney from 2002 through 2004, and he served as President of Payless ShoeSource, Inc. from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Hicks is also a director of Avery Dennison Corporation.

Richard A. Johnson age 55, has previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer sincefrom May 16, 2012.2012 through November 30, 2014. He served as Executive Vice President and Group President from July 2011 to May 15, 2012; President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker U.S., Lady Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, and Footaction from January 2010 to July 2011; President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker Europe from August 2007 to January 2010; and President and Chief Executive Officer of Footlocker.com/Eastbay from April 2003 to August 2007.

Stephen D. Jacobs, age 53, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer North America since February 29, 2016. Mr. Johnson is a directorJacobs has been with the Company for 18 years in positions of Maidenform Brands, Inc.increasing responsibility. Mr. Jacobs previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Foot Locker North America from December 1, 2014 through February 28, 2016. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker U.S., Lady Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, and Footaction from July 2011 to November 2014 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Champs Sports from January 2009 to June 2011.

Lewis P. Kimble, age 57,has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer International since February 29, 2016. Mr. Kimble previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Foot Locker Europe from February 1, 2010 to February 28, 2016. Prior to that role Mr. Kimble led our business in Australia and New Zealand as Managing Director of Foot Locker Asia Pacific. Over his almost 40 years with the Company, Mr. Kimble has also held Vice President positions across multiple functions within the United States and Europe.

Robert W. McHugh, age 54,57, has served as Executive Vice President — Operations Support since July 2011. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 2009 to July 2011; and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2005 through April 2009.2011.

Lauren B. Peters, age 51,54, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2011. She served as Senior Vice President — Strategic Planning from April 2002 to July 2011.

Gary M. Bahler,Paulette R. Alviti,age 61,45, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since August 1998, General Counsel sinceJune 2013. From March 2010 to May 2013, Ms. Alviti served in various roles at PepsiCo, Inc.: SVP and Chief Human Resources Officer Asia, Middle East, Africa (February to May 2013); SVP Global Talent Acquisition and Deployment (July 2012 to February 19932013); and Secretary since February 1990.SVP — Human Resources (March 2010 to July 2012). From March 2008 to March 2010, she served as VP — Human Resources of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

Jeffrey L. Berk, age 57,60, has served as Senior Vice President — Real Estate since February 2000.

Peter D. Brown, age 58, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since February 2011. He served as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Investor Relations from September 2006 to February 2011; and as Vice President — Investor Relations and Treasurer from October 2001 to September 2006.

Giovanna Cipriano, age 43,46, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since May 2009. Ms. Cipriano served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from November 2005 through April 2009.

Laurie J. Petrucci,Sheilagh M. Clarke, age 54,56, has served as Senior Vice President, — Human ResourcesGeneral Counsel and Secretary since June 1, 2014. She previously served as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from May 2001.2007 to May 2014.

Pawan Verma, age 39, has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer since August 10, 2015. From February 2013 to July 2015, Mr. Verma served in various technology leadership roles at Target Corporation ranging from enterprise architecture, eCommerce, Mobile and digital, with his most recent role as Vice President-Digital Technology and API Platforms. From March 2011 to January 2013, he served as Sr. Director, eCommerce, Digital and Mobile of Convergys Corporation. He also served in various technology leadership roles at Verizon Wireless between October 2003 and February 2011.

John A. Maurer, age 53,56, has served as Vice President, Treasurer and Investor Relations since February 2011. Mr. Maurer served as Vice President and Treasurer from September 2006 to February 2011. He served as Divisional Vice President and Assistant Treasurer from April 2006 to September 2006.

There are no family relationships among the executive officers or directors of the Company.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Item 5.Market for the Company’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Foot Locker, Inc. common stock (ticker symbol “FL”) is listed on The New York Stock Exchange as well as on the Börse Stuttgart stock exchange in Germany. As of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, the Company had 17,04714,237 shareholders of record owning 150,069,929136,976,809 common shares.

The following table provides for the period indicated, the intra-day high and low sales prices for the Company’s common stock:stock for the periods indicated below:

        
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 High Low High Low High Low High Low
1st Quarter $32.27  $26.00  $22.03  $17.21  $63.66  $52.12  $48.71  $36.65 
2nd Quarter  34.00   27.86   25.50   21.00   71.07   60.14   52.07   46.20 
3rd Quarter  37.65   32.51   23.02   16.66   77.25   63.02   58.40   47.90 
4th Quarter  36.09   31.07   26.82   20.82   69.99   57.23   59.19   51.12 

During each of the quarters of 20122015, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18$0.25 per share. The Board of Directors reviews the dividend policy and rate, taking into consideration the overall financial and strategic outlook for our earnings, liquidity, and cash flow projections.flow. On February 20, 2013,17, 2016, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20$0.275 per share to be paid on May 3, 2013.April 29, 2016. This dividend represents an 11a 10 percent increase over the Company’s previous quarterly per share amount.

The following table is a summary of our fourth quarter share repurchases:

    
Date Purchased Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased(1)
 Average
Price Paid
per Share(1)
 Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program(2)
 Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that may
yet be Purchased
Under the
Program(2)
Oct. 28, 2012 – Nov. 24, 2012          $305,735,784 
Nov. 25, 2012 – Dec. 29, 2012  1,039,000  $33.68   1,039,000  $270,737,739 
Dec. 30, 2012 – Feb. 2, 2013          $270,737,739 
    1,039,000  $33.68   1,039,000  $270,739,739 
    
Date Purchased Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased(1)
 Average
Price Paid
Per Share(1)
 Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Program(2)
 Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that may
yet be Purchased
Under the
Program(2)
Nov. 1, 2015 – Nov. 28, 2015  1,305,157  $62.63   1,300,000  $658,881,376 
Nov. 29, 2015 – Jan. 2, 2016  219,484   64.76   219,484   644,668,097 
Jan. 3, 2016 – Jan. 30, 2016  124,418   63.20   123,616   636,854,327 
    1,649,059   62.96   1,643,100      

(1)These columns also reflect shares purchasedacquired in connection withsatisfaction of the tax withholding obligation of holders of restricted stock swaps.awards which vested during the quarter, stock swaps, and shares repurchased pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The calculation of the average price paid per share includes all fees, commissions, and other costs associated with the repurchase of such shares.
(2)On February 14, 2012,17, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a 3-year, $400 million$1 billion share repurchase program extending through January 2015.2018. Through February 2, 2013, 4.0January 30, 2016, 5.6 million shares of common stock were purchased under this program, for an aggregate cost of $129$363 million.

On February 20, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a new 3-year, $600 million share repurchase program extending through January 2016, replacing the Company’s previous $400 million program which terminated on that date.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Graph

The following graph below compares the cumulative five-year total return to shareholders (common stock price appreciation plus dividends, on a reinvested basis) on Foot Locker, Inc.’s common stock relative to the total returns of the S&P 400 Retailing Index and the Russell Midcap Index.

The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be filed with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing.

Indexed Share Price Performance

      
  1/29/2011 1/28/2012 2/2/2013 2/1/2014 1/31/2015 1/30/2016
Foot Locker, Inc. $100.00  $153.23  $204.76  $233.92  $328.29  $423.20 
S&P 400 Retailing Index $100.00  $121.84  $150.82  $170.21  $206.94  $181.10 
Russell Midcap Index $100.00  $103.82  $123.03  $150.86  $171.46  $158.80 
      
 2/2/2008 1/31/2009 1/30/2010 1/29/2011 1/28/2012 2/2/2013
Foot Locker, Inc. $100.00  $52.80  $80.99  $127.47  $189.67  $247.92 
S&P 400 Retailing Index $100.00  $58.94  $102.23  $144.76  $174.61  $213.90 
Russell Midcap Index $100.00  $55.58  $79.89  $103.28  $105.52  $122.85 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and other information contained elsewhere in this report.

          
($ in millions, except per share amounts) 2012(1) 2011 2010 2009 2008
Summary of Continuing Operations
                         
 2015 2014 2013 2012(1) 2011
  (in millions, except per share amounts) 
Summary of Operations
                         
Sales $6,182   5,623   5,049   4,854   5,237  $7,412   7,151   6,505   6,182   5,623 
Gross margin  2,034   1,796   1,516   1,332   1,460   2,505   2,374   2,133   2,034   1,796 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,294   1,244   1,138   1,099   1,174   1,415   1,426   1,334   1,294   1,244 
Impairment and other charges  12   5   10   41   259 
Litigation, impairment and other charges  105   4   2   12   5 
Depreciation and amortization  118   110   106   112   130   148   139   133   118   110 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9   10   5   4   5   5   5   6 
Other income  (2  (4  (4  (3  (8  (4)   (9  (4  (2  (4
Income (loss) from continuing operations, after-tax  397   278   169   47   (79
Net income  541   520   429   397   278 
Per Common Share Data
                                                  
Basic earnings  2.62   1.81   1.08   0.30   (0.52  3.89   3.61   2.89   2.62   1.81 
Diluted earnings  2.58   1.80   1.07   0.30   (0.52  3.84   3.56   2.85   2.58   1.80 
Common stock dividends declared per share  0.72   0.66   0.60   0.60   0.60   1.00   0.88   0.80   0.72   0.66 
Weighted-average Common Shares Outstanding
                                                  
Basic earnings  151.2   153.0   155.7   156.0   154.0   139.1   143.9   148.4   151.2   153.0 
Diluted earnings  154.0   154.4   156.7   156.3   154.0   140.8   146.0   150.5   154.0   154.4 
Financial Condition
                                                  
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments $928   851   696   589   408  $1,021   967   867   928   851 
Merchandise inventories  1,167   1,069   1,059   1,037   1,120   1,285   1,250   1,220   1,167   1,069 
Property and equipment, net  490   427   386   387   432   661   620   590   490   427 
Total assets  3,367   3,050   2,896   2,816   2,877   3,775   3,577   3,487   3,367   3,050 
Long-term debt  133   135   137   138   142 
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases  130   134   139   133   135 
Total shareholders’ equity  2,377   2,110   2,025   1,948   1,924   2,553   2,496   2,496   2,377   2,110 
Financial Ratios
                                                  
Sales per average gross square foot(2) $443   406   360   333   350  $504   490   460   443   406 
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)(3)  612   441   266   83   (95
EBIT margin(3)  9.9  7.8   5.3   1.7   (1.8
Net income margin(3)  6.4  4.9   3.3   1.0   (1.5
SG&A as a percentage of sales  19.1%   19.9   20.5   20.9   22.1 
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) $841   814   668   612   441 
EBIT margin  11.3%   11.4   10.3   9.9   7.8 
EBIT margin (non-GAAP)(3)  12.8%   11.4   10.4   9.9   7.9 
Net income margin  7.3%   7.3   6.6   6.4   4.9 
Net income margin (non-GAAP)(3)  8.2%   7.3   6.6   6.2   5.0 
Return on assets (ROA)  12.4  9.4   5.9   1.7   (2.6  14.7%   14.7   12.5   12.4   9.4 
Return on invested capital (ROIC)(4)  14.2  11.8   8.3   5.3   5.4 
Net debt capitalization percent(5)  37.2  36.0   39.0   43.0   46.7 
Return on invested capital (ROIC)(3)  15.8%   15.0   14.1   14.2   11.8 
Net debt capitalization percent(3),(4)  47.4%   43.4   42.5   37.2   36.0 
Current ratio  3.7   3.8   4.0   4.1   4.2   3.7   3.5   3.8   3.7   3.8 
Other Data
                                                  
Capital expenditures $163   152   97   89   146  $228   190   206   163   152 
Number of stores at year end  3,335   3,369   3,426   3,500   3,641   3,383   3,423   3,473   3,335   3,369 
Total selling square footage at year end (in millions)  7.26   7.38   7.54   7.74   8.09   7.58   7.48   7.47   7.26   7.38 
Total gross square footage at year end (in millions)  12.32   12.45   12.64   12.96   13.50   12.92   12.73   12.71   12.32   12.45 

(1)2012 represents the 53 weeks ended February 2, 2013.
(2)Calculated as Athletic Store sales divided by the average monthly ending gross square footage of the last thirteen months. The computation for each of the years presented reflects the foreign exchange rate in affecteffect for such year. The 2012 amount has been calculated excluding the sales of the 53rd week.
(3)Calculated using results from continuing operations.
(4)See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”Operations” for additional information and calculation.
(5)(4)Represents total debt and obligations under capital leases, net of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Additionally, this calculation includes the present value of operating leases, and accordingly is considered a non-GAAP measure.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Business Overview

Foot Locker, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates in two reportable segments — Athletic Stores and Direct-to-Customers. The Athletic Stores segment is one of the largest athletic footwear and apparel retailers in the world, whosewith formats that include Foot Locker, Lady Foot Locker, SIX:02, Kids Foot Locker, Champs Sports, Footaction, Runners Point and CCS.Sidestep. The Direct-to-Customers segment includes Footlocker.com, Inc. and other affiliates, including Eastbay, Inc., and CCS,our international ecommerce businesses, which sell to customers through their Internet websites,and mobile devices,sites and catalogs.

The Foot Locker brand is one of the most widely recognized names in the markets in which the Company operates, epitomizing highpremium quality for the active lifestyle customer. This brand equity has aided the Company’s ability to successfully develop and increase its portfolio of complementary retail store formats, such as Lady Foot Locker, Footaction and Kids Foot Locker, as well as Footlocker.com, its direct-to-customersdirect-to-customer business. Through various marketing channels, including broadcast, digital, social, print, and various sports sponsorships and events, the Company reinforces its image with a consistent message-message — namely, that it is the destination for athletically inspired shoes and apparel with a wide selection of merchandise in a full-service environment.

Store Profile

              
      Square Footage      Square Footage
 January 28, 2012 Opened Closed February 2, 2013 Relocations/Remodels (in thousands)      (in thousands)
 Selling Gross January 31, 2015 Opened Closed January 30,
2016
 Relocations/
Remodels
 Selling Gross
Foot Locker US  1,118   9   55   1,072   58   2,515   4,311   1,015   8   52   971   54   2,451   4,234 
Foot Locker Europe  561   39   10   590   41   808   1,770   603   16   13   606   34   863   1,884 
Foot Locker Canada  129   2   2   129   9   264   406   126   1   2   125   8   279   435 
Foot Locker Asia Pacific  91   3   2   92   5   128   206   91   4   1   94   6   128   210 
Lady Foot Locker  331   1   29   303   17   398   685   198      42   156      208   352 
SIX:02  15   15      30      62   101 
Kids Foot Locker  291   18   4   305   13   421   727   357   27   10   374   44   602   1,029 
Footaction  292   1   10   283   18   817   1,299   272   13   17   268   20   800   1,303 
Champs Sports  534   12   7   539   37   1,876   2,861   547   10   7   550   41   1,947   2,972 
CCS  22         22      34   51 
Runners Point  116   10   5   121   2   158   259 
Sidestep  83   7   2   88      82   139 
Total  3,369   85   119   3,335   198   7,261   12,316   3,423   111   151   3,383   209   7,580   12,918 

Athletic Stores

The Company operates 3,3353,383 stores in the Athletic Stores segment. The following is a brief description of the Athletic Stores segment’s operating businesses:businesses and their respective taglines:

Foot Locker — “Sneaker Central”“Approved” — Foot Locker is a leading global athletic footwear and apparel retailer.retailer, which caters to the sneaker enthusiast — If it’s at Foot Locker, it’s Approved. Its stores offer the latest in athletically-inspired performance products,footwear and apparel, manufactured primarily by the leading athletic brands. Foot Locker offersprovides the best selection of premium products for a wide variety of activities, including basketball, running, and training. Additionally, we operate 65199 House of Hoops, primarily a shop-in-shop concept, which sells premier basketball inspired products.basketball-inspired footwear and apparel. Foot Locker’s 1,8831,796 stores are located in 23 countries including 1,072971 in the United States, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam, 129125 in Canada, 590606 in Europe, and a combined 9294 in Australia and New Zealand. The domestic stores have an average of 2,3002,500 selling square feet and the international stores have an average of 1,500 selling square feet.

Lady Foot Locker  — “The Place for Her” — Lady Foot Locker is a leading U.S. retailer of athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories fordedicated to active women. Its stores carry major athletic footwear, apparel, and apparelaccessories brands as well as casual wear and an assortment of apparel designed for a variety of activities, including running, walking, training, and fitness. In November 2012, the Company announced the introduction of a new banner named “SIX:02.” This new banner is an elevated retail concept featuring top brands in fitness apparel and athletic footwear for women. Lady Foot Locker and SIX:02 operate 300 and 3operates 156 stores respectively, andthat are located in the United States and Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.Rico. These stores have an average of 1,300 selling square feet.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIX:02 — “It’s Your Time — SIX:02 is an elevated retail concept designed for the modern woman, featuring top brands in athletic-inspired style. The apparel, footwear, and accessories assortments are carefully curated to inspire her best self-expression — in the gym and out of it. This banner has unique local fitness and fashion partners in each market and also leverages top celebrity and social influencers to connect meaningfully to all aspects of a woman’s life. SIX:02 operates 30 stores in the United States and have an average of 2,100 selling square feet.

Kids Foot Locker — “Where Kids Come First”“Go Big” — Kids Foot Locker is a national children’syouth athletic retailer that offers the largest selection of brand-name athletic footwear, apparel and accessories for children.young athletes. Its stores feature an environment geared to appeal to both parents and children. Its 305Of its 374 stores, 349 are located in the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, 18 in Europe, and 7 in Canada. These stores have an average of 1,4001,600 selling square feet.

Footaction — “Head-to-Toe Sport Inspired Style”“Own It” — Footaction is a national athletic footwear and apparel retailer.retailer that offers the freshest, best edited selection of athletic lifestyle brands and looks. This banner is uniquely positioned at the intersection of sport and style. The primary customer is a style-obsessed, confident, influential young male who is driven by style and is always thoughtful about his look.dressed to impress. Its 283268 stores are located throughout the United States and Puerto Rico and focus on marquee footwear and branded apparel.authentic, premium product. The Footaction stores have an average of 2,9003,000 selling square feet.

Champs Sports — “We Know Game” — Champs Sports is one of the largest mall-based specialty athletic footwear and apparel retailers in North America. Its product categories include athletic footwear and apparel, and sport-lifestyle inspired accessories. This assortment allows Champs Sports to differentiate itself from other mall-based stores by presenting complete head-to-toe merchandising stories representing the most powerful athletic brands, sports teams, and athletes in North America. Its 539Of its 550 stores, 519 are located throughout the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.Islands and 31 in Canada. The Champs Sports stores have an average of 3,500 selling square feet.

CCSRunners Point — “Your Way, Our Passion” — AsRunners Point specializes in running footwear, apparel, and equipment for performance and lifestyle purposes. Its 121 stores are located in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. This banner caters to local running communities providing technical products, training tips and access to local running and group events. The Runners Point stores have an average of February 2, 2013, we operated 221,300 selling square feet.

Sidestep — “Sneaker Lifestyle” — Sidestep is a predominantly sports fashion footwear banner. Its 88 stores are located in Germany, Austria, the United States. During the first quarterNetherlands, and Switzerland. Sidestep caters to a more discerning, fashion consumer. Sidestep stores have an average of 2013, we expect to close all the locations. The CCS brand will be operated solely as an ecommerce business.900 selling square feet.

Direct-to-Customers

The Company’s Direct-to-Customers segment is multi-branded and multi-channeled. This segment sells through its affiliates, directly to customers through its Internet websites,and mobile devices,sites and catalogs. The Direct-to-Customers segment operates the websites for eastbay.com, final-score.com, eastbayteamservices.com, ccs.com, as well aseastbayteamsales.com, and sp24.com. Additionally, this segment includes the websites aligned with the brand names of its store banners (footlocker.com, ladyfootlocker.com, six02.com kidsfootlocker.com, champssports.com, footaction.com, footlocker.ca, footlocker.eu, runnerspoint.com, and champssports.com)sidestep-shoes.com). These sites offer some of the largest online selections of athletically inspired shoes and apparel, while providing a seamless link between ecommerce and store banners.

Eastbay — “First“First Choice forFor Athletes” — Eastbay is among the largest direct marketers in the United States, providing theserious high school athleteand other athletes with a complete sports solution including athletic footwear, apparel, equipment, team licensed, and private-label merchandise.merchandise for a broad range of sports.

CCS — “We are Board Culture” — In 2008, the Company purchased CCS, an Internet and catalog retailer of skateboard equipment, apparel, footwear, and accessories. CCS serves the needs of the 12-20 year old seeking an authentic board lifestyle shop. CCS is anchored in skate but appealing to the surrounding board culture. The CCS format offers board lifestyle merchandise that will fit the needs of the customer all year long and stocks the best selection of both core and lifestyle brands. The retail store operations of CCS are included in the Athletic Stores segment.

Franchise Operations

In 2006, theThe Company entered into ahas two separate ten-year area development agreementagreements with the Alshaya Trading Co. W.L.L.,third parties for the operation of Foot Locker stores located within the Middle East subject to certain restrictions. Additionally,and the Republic of Korea. The franchised stores located in 2007,Germany operate under the Company entered into a ten-year agreement with another third party forRunners Point banner. A total of 64 franchised stores were operating at January 30, 2016, of which 40 were operating in the exclusive right to openMiddle East, 16 in Germany, and operate Foot Locker stores8 in the Republic of Korea.

A total During 2015, the Company completed an acquisition from Futura Sport AG of 42 franchised10 Runners Point and Sidestep stores, which were operating at February 2, 2013.previously franchise stores. Royalty income from the franchised stores was not significant for any of the periods presented. These stores are not included in the Company’s operating store count above.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures

In the following tables, the Company has presented certain financial measures and ratios identified as non-GAAP. The Company believes this non-GAAP information is a useful measure to investors because it allows for a more direct comparison of the Company’s performance for 20122015 as compared with prior years and is useful in assessing the Company’s progress in achieving its long-term financial objectives.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The 2012 results represent the 53 weeks ended February 2, 2013 as compared with 52 weeks in the 2011 and 2010 reporting years.

The following represents a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures discussed throughout the Overview of Consolidated Results:

   
  2015 2014 2013
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Pre-tax income:
               
Income before income taxes $837  $809  $663 
Pre-tax amounts excluded from GAAP:
               
Pension litigation charge  100       
Impairment and other charges  5   4   2 
Runners Point Group integration and acquisition costs     2   6 
Gain on sale of real estate     (4   
Total pre-tax amounts excluded  105   2   8 
Income before income taxes (non-GAAP) $942  $811  $671 
Calculation of Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT):
               
Income before income taxes $837  $809  $663 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
EBIT $841  $814  $668 
Income before income taxes (non-GAAP) $942  $811  $671 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
EBIT (non-GAAP) $946  $816  $676 
EBIT margin %  11.3%   11.4  10.3
EBIT margin % (non-GAAP)  12.8%   11.4  10.4
After-tax income:
               
Net income $541  $520  $429 
After-tax amounts excluded from GAAP:
               
Pension litigation charge  61       
Impairment and other charges  4   3   1 
Runners Point Group acquisition and integration costs     2   5 
Gain on sale of property     (3   
Settlement of foreign tax audits        (3
Net income (non-GAAP) $606  $522  $432 
Net income margin %  7.3%   7.3  6.6
Net income margin % (non-GAAP)  8.2%   7.3  6.6
Diluted earnings per share:
               
Net income $3.84  $3.56  $2.85 
Pension litigation charge  0.43       
Impairment and other charges  0.02   0.02   0.01 
Runners Point Group acquisition and integration costs     0.01   0.03 
Gain on sale of property     (0.01   
Settlement of foreign tax audits        (0.02
Net income (non-GAAP) $4.29  $3.58  $2.87 
   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales:
               
Sales $6,182  $5,623  $5,049 
53rd week  81       
Sales excluding 53rd week (non-GAAP) $6,101  $5,623  $5,049 
Pre-tax income:
               
Income before income taxes $607  $435  $257 
Pre-tax amounts excluded from GAAP:
               
53rd week  (22      
Impairment charges  12   5   10 
Money market realized gain – recorded within other income        (2
Total pre-tax amounts excluded  (10  5   8 
Income before income taxes (non-GAAP) $597  $440  $265 
Calculation of Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT):
               
Income before income taxes $607  $435  $257 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9 
EBIT $612  $441  $266 
Income before income taxes (non-GAAP) $597  $440  $265 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9 
EBIT (non-GAAP) $602  $446  $274 
EBIT margin %  9.9  7.8  5.3
EBIT margin % (non-GAAP)  9.9  7.9  5.4
After-tax income:
               
Net income $397  $278  $169 
After-tax amounts excluded from GAAP:               
53rd week  (14      
Impairment charges  7   3   4 
Settlement of a foreign tax audit  (9      
Canadian tax rate changes  (1      
Net income (non-GAAP) $380  $281  $173 
Net income margin %  6.4  4.9  3.3
Net income margin % (non-GAAP)  6.2  5.0  3.4
Diluted earnings per share:
               
Net income $2.58  $1.80  $1.07 
53rd week  (0.09      
Impairment charges  0.05   0.02   0.04 
Settlement of a foreign tax audit  (0.06      
Canadian tax rate changes  (0.01      
Money-market realized gain        (0.01
Net income (non-GAAP) $2.47  $1.82  $1.10 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Company estimates the tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments by applying its effectivemarginal tax rate to each of the respective items. The money-market gainDuring 2013, the Company recorded a benefit of $3 million, or $0.02 per diluted share, to reflect the settlement of foreign tax audits, which resulted in 2010 with respect to The Reserve International Liquidity Fund, Ltd. was recorded with noa reduction in tax expense due to the fact that the entity that held the investment has a zero statutory tax rate.reserves established in prior periods.

When assessing Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”), the Company adjusts its results to reflect its operating leases as if they qualified for capital lease treatment. Operating leases are the primary financing vehicle used to fund store expansion and, therefore, we believe that the presentation of these leases as if they were capital


TABLE OF CONTENTS

leases is appropriate. Accordingly, the asset base and net income amounts are adjusted to reflect this in the calculation of ROIC. ROIC, subject to certain adjustments, is also used as a measure in executive long-term incentive compensation.

The closest U.S. GAAP measure is Return on Assets (“ROA”) and is also represented below. ROA increased to 12.4 percent asremained unchanged compared with 9.4 percent in the prior year reflectingyear. Our ROIC improvement is due to an increase in our non-GAAP earnings before interest and income taxes, partially offset by an increase in our average invested capital, primarily related to an increase in capitalized operating leases. This reflected the Company’s overall performance in 2012.inclusion of the new headquarters lease and the effect of opening larger stores supporting the various shop-in-shop initiatives.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
ROA(1)  12.4  9.4  5.9  14.7%   14.7  12.5
ROIC % (non-GAAP)(2)  14.2  11.8  8.3  15.8%   15.0  14.1

(1)Represents net income of $397$541 million, $278$520 million, and $169$429 million divided by average total assets of $3,209$3,676 million, $2,973$3,532 million, and $2,856$3,427 million for 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively.
(2)See below for the calculation of ROIC.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
EBIT (non-GAAP) $602  $446  $274  $946  $816  $676 
+ Rent expense  560   544   522   640   635   600 
- Estimated depreciation on capitalized operating leases(3)  (409  (389  (366  (498)   (482  (443
Net operating profit  753   601   430   1,088   969   833 
- Adjusted income tax expense(4)  (274  (218  (153  (391)   (347  (298
= Adjusted return after taxes $479  $383  $277  $697  $622  $535 
Average total assets $3,209  $2,973  $2,856  $3,676  $3,532  $3,427 
- Average cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments
  (890  (774  (642  (994)   (917  (898
- Average non-interest bearing current liabilities  (592  (519  (461  (697)   (659  (630
- Average merchandise inventories  (1,118  (1,064  (1,048  (1,268)   (1,235  (1,194
+ Average estimated asset base of capitalized operating leases(3)  1,552   1,429   1,443   2,346   2,093   1,829 
+ 13-month average merchandise inventories  1,200   1,192   1,177   1,337   1,325   1,269 
= Average invested capital $3,361  $3,237  $3,325  $4,400  $4,139  $3,803 
ROIC %  14.2  11.8  8.3  15.8%   15.0  14.1
(3)The determination of the capitalized operating leases and the adjustments to income have been calculated on a lease-by-lease basis and have been consistently calculated in each of the years presented above. Capitalized operating leases represent the best estimate of the asset base that would be recorded for operating leases as if they had been classified as capital or as if the property were purchased. The present value of operating leases is discounted using various interest rates ranging from 2.5 percent to 14.5 percent, which represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at inception of the lease. The capitalized operating leases and related income statements amounts disclosed above do not reflect the requirements of the recently issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02,Leases.
(4)The adjusted income tax expense represents the marginal tax rate applied to net operating profit for each of the periods presented.

Overview of Consolidated Results

In March 2015, the Company updated its long-range plan and long-term financial objectives as presented below. The following represents our results and our progress towards meeting the updated objectives. Non-GAAP results are presented for all the periods.

    
  Long-term
Objectives
 2015 2014 2013
Sales ($ in millions) $10,000  $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Sales per gross square foot $600  $504  $490  $460 
EBIT margin  12.5%   12.8%   11.4  10.4
Net income margin  8.5%   8.2%   7.3  6.6
ROIC  17.0%   15.8%   15.0  14.1

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Overview of Consolidated Results

In March 2012, the Company updated its long-range plan and updated the long-term financial objectives in lightHighlights of our progress in achieving the original objectives established in 2010. Our results and long-term objectives are presented below:

    
 2012 2011 2010 Long-term Objectives
Sales (in millions)(1) $6,101  $5,623  $5,049  $7,500 
Sales per gross square foot $443  $406   360  $500 
EBIT margin(1)  9.9  7.9  5.4  11.0
Net income margin(1)  6.2  5.0  3.4  7.0
ROIC(1)  14.2  11.8  8.3  14.0

(1)Represents non-GAAP results for all periods presented.

Excluding the results of the 53rd week, highlights of our 20122015 financial performance include:

Sales and comparable-store sales, as noted in the table below, both increased reflecting the continued success of our strategic plan, coupled with the favorable athletic trend. Salesand continued to benefit from new exciting assortments and enhanced store formats across our various product lines.banners, as well as improved performance of the Company’s store banner.com websites.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
Sales increase  8.5  11.4  4.0  3.6%   9.9  6.6
Comparable-store sales increase  9.4  9.8  5.8  8.5%   8.0  4.2
The following represents the percentage of sales from each of the major product categories:

   
  2015 2014 2013
Footwear sales  82%   79  77
Apparel and accessories sales  18%   21  23
Sales from the Direct-to-Customers segment increased 9.1 percent to $944 million, compared with $865 million in 2014 and increased 60 basis points as a percentage of total sales to 12.7 percent. The direct business has been steadily increasing over the last several years, led by the growth in the store banners’ ecommerce sales.
Gross margin, as a percentage of sales, increased 90by 60 basis points to 32.833.8 percent in 2012. Our2015. The improvement was driven by a decrease in the occupancy and buyers’ compensation expenses improved by 90 basis points forexpense rate coupled with an increase in the same period reflecting improvedmerchandise margin rate. These reflect effective leverage on higher sales. In addition, our merchandise margin rate improved by 10 basis points. These improvements were offset bysales and a 10 basis point reduction associated with shipping and handling.lower markdown rate.
SG&A expenses on a constant currency basis were 21.019.2 percent of sales, an improvementa decrease of 11070 basis points as compared with the prior year, as we carefully managedcontinued to diligently manage expenses.
EBIT margin was 12.8 percent, surpassing the long-term financial objective and reflecting the strong earnings generated during 2015.
Net income on a non-GAAP basis was $380$606 million, or $2.47$4.29 diluted earnings per share, an increase of 35.719.8 percent from the prior-year period.

The following representsCompany ended the year in a summarystrong financial position. At year end, the Company had $891 million of the activity for the 53 week period ended February 2, 2013:

Cash,cash and cash equivalents, net of debt and short-term investmentsobligations under capital leases. Cash and cash equivalents at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 were $928$1,021 million, representing an increase of $77 million.
Cash flow provided from operations was $416 million, representing a decrease of $81$54 million as compared with the priorlast year. This decreaseimprovement reflects earnings strength and the successful execution of various key initiatives noted in the items below.
Net cash provided by operating activities was primarily driven by an$745 million, representing a $33 million increase in merchandise inventories, which was planned in order to support sales for early February, which is typically a strong period for us.over last year.
CapitalCash capital expenditures during 20122015 totaled $163$228 million and were primarily directed to the remodeling or relocation of 198209 stores, the build-out of 85approximately 100 new stores, as well as other technology and continued improvementsinfrastructure projects.
During 2015 we returned significant value to the features and functionality of our websites, enhancing the cross-channel experience.
shareholders. Dividends totaling $109$139 million were declared and paid during 2012, returning significant value to our shareholders.
A2015, and a total of $129 million, or 4.06.7 million shares were repurchased as part ofunder our previously-announced share repurchase program. On February 20, 2013, we announced a new 3-year, $600 million share repurchase program extending through January 2016.at a cost of $419 million.
ROIC increased to 14.215.8 percent as compared to the prior year result of 15.0 percent, reflecting productivityprofitability improvements and a disciplined approach to capital spending.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table represents a summary

Summary of sales and operating results, reconciled to income before income taxes:

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Sales
               
Athletic Stores $5,568  $5,110  $4,617 
Direct-to-Customers  614   513   432 
   $6,182  $5,623  $5,049 
Operating Results
               
Athletic Stores(1) $653  $495  $329 
Direct-to-Customers(2)  65   45   30 
    718   540   359 
Restructuring charge(3)     (1   
Division profit  718   539   359 
Less: Corporate expense  108   102   97 
Operating profit  610   437   262 
Other income(4)  2   4   4 
Earnings before interest expense and income taxes  612   441   266 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9 
Income before income taxes $607  $435  $257 
   
  2015 2014 2013
   (in millions, except per share data)
Sales $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Gross margin  2,505   2,374   2,133 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,415   1,426   1,334 
Depreciation and amortization  148   139   133 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
Net income $541  $520  $429 
Diluted earnings per share $3.84  $3.56  $2.85 

(1)The results for 2012 include a non-cash impairment charge of $5 million to write down long-lived assets of the CCS stores as a result of the Company’s decision to close the stores during the first quarter of 2013.
(2)Included in the results for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are non-cash impairment charges of $7 million, $5 million, and $10 million, respectively, to write down the CCS tradename intangible asset.
(3)In 2011, the Company increased its 1993 Repositioning and 1991 Restructuring reserve by $1 million for repairs necessary to one of the locations comprising this reserve. This amount is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
(4)Other income includes non-operating items such as: gains from insurance recoveries; discounts/premiums paid on the repurchase and retirement of bonds; royalty income; and the changes in fair value, premiums paid, and realized gains associated with foreign currency option contracts. Included in the year ended January 29, 2011 is a $2 million gain to reflect the Company’s settlement of its money-market investment in The Reserve International Liquidity Fund.

Sales

All references to comparable-store sales for a given period relate to sales from stores (including sales fromof stores that have been relocated or remodeled during the relevant periods) that arewere open at the period-end that haveand had been open for more than one year, andyear. The computation of comparable-store sales fromalso includes the sales of the Direct-to-Customers segment. Stores opened or closed during the period are not included in the comparable-store base; however, stores closed temporarily for relocation or remodeling are included. Computations exclude the effect of foreign currency fluctuations. Stores opened and closed during the period are not included. Comparable-store sales for 2012 do not include the sales from the 53rd week of 2012.

Sales of $6,182$7,412 million in 20122015 increased by 9.93.6 percent from sales of $5,623$7,151 million in 2011. Results for 2012 include the effect2014, this represented a comparable-store sales increase of the 53rd week, which represented sales of $81 million.8.5 percent. Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, sales increased 11.48.9 percent as compared with 2011. Comparable-store sales2014. Sales of $7,151 million in 2014 increased by 9.49.9 percent which was primarily driven by higher footwear sales. Footwearfrom sales of $6,505 million in 2013, this represented 76 percenta comparable-store sales increase of total sales. Apparel and accessories sales, also increased during 2012 and represented 24 percent of total sales.

Sales in 2011 increased to $5,623 million, or by 11.4 percent as compared with 2010.8.0 percent. Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations and sales of Runners Point Group, sales increased 9.78.5 percent as compared with 2010. Comparable-store sales increased2013.

Gross Margin

   
  2015 2014 2013
Gross margin rate  33.8%   33.2  32.8
Basis point increase in the gross margin rate  60   40      
Components of the increase-
               
Merchandise margin rate improvement/(decline)  30   (30     
Lower occupancy and buyers’ compensation expense rate  30   70      

The gross margin rate improved by 9.8 percent. This increase primarily reflected higher footwear sales. Apparel and accessories sales also increased, which represented approximately 24 percent of sales, reflecting a modest increase over60 basis points during 2015 as compared with the corresponding prior-year periodperiod. Excluding the effect of 23 percent.foreign currency fluctuations, the gross margin rate improved by 70 basis points in 2015. The improvement was driven by both an improved merchandise margin rate and a decrease in the occupancy and buyers’ compensation rate reflecting improved sales leverage. The improvement in the merchandise margin rate primarily reflected an enhanced ability to achieve full-priced selling, as fewer markdowns were needed due to the freshness of inventory.

Gross margin in 2014 improved 40 basis points to 33.2 percent as compared with 2013. This improvement reflected a decrease in the occupancy and buyers’ compensation rate, which reflected improved leverage of primarily fixed costs. Merchandise margin declined by 30 basis points in 2014 as the cost of merchandise increased as compared with 2013. This primarily reflected the effect of lower initial markups driven by supplier and category mix, and lower shipping and handling margin, partially offset by lower markdowns.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
SG&A $1,415  $1,426  $1,334 
$ Change $(11)  $92      
% Change  (0.8)%   6.9     
SG&A as a percentage of sales  19.1%   19.9  20.5

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Gross Margin

Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 32.9 percent in 2012, representing an increase of 100 basis points as compared with the prior year. The increase in the gross margin rate included a decrease of 110 basis points in the occupancy and buyers’ compensation expense rate reflecting improved leverage on largely fixed costs, offset by an increase in the cost of merchandise of 10 basis points. The decline in the merchandise margin rate primarily reflects the effect of lower initial markups, higher markdowns in Europe, and the effect of lower shipping and handling income. The markdowns in Europe were necessary to ensure that merchandise inventories remained current and in line with sales trend. The Direct-to-Customers segment continued to provide free shipping offers to remain competitive with other Internet retailers. Vendor allowances had no effect on the gross margin rate, as compared with the prior year. Excluding the effect of the 53rd week in 2012, gross margin increased by 90 basis points as compared with 2011.

Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 31.9 percent in 2011, increasing by 190 basis points as compared with 2010. This increase reflected a decrease of 120 basis points in the occupancy and buyers’ compensation expense rate reflecting improved leverage on largely fixed costs and a 70 basis points improvement in the merchandise margin rate as the Company was less promotional during 2011. Our inventory position had improved in 2011, both in terms of the overall levels of inventory and its quality. This improvement, along with better merchandise allocations, is primarily the result of ongoing initiatives to improve our inventory productivity, which contributes to our ability to be less promotional. The effect of vendor allowances, as compared with the prior year, contributed 10 basis points to this improvement.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased by $50 million, or 4.0 percent, to $1,294 million in 2012, as compared with 2011. SG&A as a percentage of sales decreased to 20.9 percent as compared with 22.1 percent in 2011. Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, SG&A increased by $69 million. This$72 million for 2015 as compared with 2014. The increase reflects the effect of the 53rd week, which contributed $13 million in additional expenses, as well aswas driven by higher variable expenses to support sales, such as store wages and banking expenses. The Company also increased its marketing and advertising spending by $8 million during 2012 in order to support the Company’s strategic objective of differentiating its formats.

SG&A expenses increased by $106 million, or 9.3 percent, to $1,244 million in 2011, as compared with prior year. SG&A asAs a percentage of sales, decreasedSG&A improved 80 basis points representing improved leverage on our sales increase. Consistent with the prior year, this improvement reflects effective expense management, specifically store wage improvements due to 22.1 percent as compared with 22.5 percent in 2010. productivity gains reflecting the continued utilization of hiring and scheduling tools.

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, in 2011, SG&A increased by $86 million. This$101 million for 2014 as compared with 2013. Runners Point Group, which was acquired in early July 2013, represented an incremental $39 million in expenses in 2014. Additionally, the Company incurred $2 million in integration costs during 2014. Excluding these items, the increase primarily reflectedwas driven by higher variable expenses to support sales, such as store wages and banking expenses. As a percentage of sales, SG&A improved 60 basis points representing improved leverage on our sales increase. This improvement reflected continued effective expense management, including store wages, which benefitted from the utilization of hiring and scheduling tools, as well as enhanced associate training.

Depreciation and Amortization

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Depreciation and Amortization $148  $139  $133 
$ Change  9   6      
% Change  6.5%   4.5     

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, depreciation and amortization increased $17 million in 2015. On a constant currency basis, the increases in each year presented reflect increased capital spending on store improvements, our digital sites and other various technologies. In addition, the 2014 amount included $2 million of capital accrual adjustments made during the third quarter of 2014, which reduced depreciation and amortization.

Pension Litigation Charge

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company recorded a $100 million pension litigation charge ($61 million after-tax or $0.43 per diluted share). This charge relates to a class action in which the plaintiffs alleged that the Company failed to properly disclose the effects of the 1996 conversion of the retirement plan to a defined benefit plan with a cash balance formula. In September 2015, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and issued a decision ordering that the pension plan be reformed. The Company is appealing the court’s decision, and the judgment has been stayed pending the outcome of the appeal. The Company’s reasonable estimate of this liability is a range between $100 million and $200 million, with no amount within that range more probable than any other amount. Therefore, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $100 million. Please see Item 8. “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” Note 23,Legal Proceedings for further information.

Interest Expense, Net

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Interest expense $11  $11  $11 
Interest income  (7)   (6  (6
Interest expense, net $4  $5  $5 
Weighted-average interest rate (excluding fees)  7.2%   7.2  7.1

Net interest expense decreased by $1 million in 2015 as compared with 2014, reflecting increased income due to higher interest rates. Net interest expense in 2014 was essentially unchanged from 2013. The Company did not have any short-term borrowings, other than amounts outstanding in connection with capital leases, for any of the periods presented.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for 2015 was 35.4 percent, as compared with 35.7 percent in 2014. The Company regularly assesses the adequacy of the provisions for income tax contingencies in accordance with the applicable authoritative guidance on accounting for income taxes. As a result, the reserves for unrecognized tax benefits may be adjusted due to new facts and developments, such as changes to interpretations of relevant tax law, assessments from taxing authorities, settlements with taxing authorities, and lapses of statutes of limitations. The effective tax rate for 2015 and 2014 includes reserve releases totaling $4 million and $5 million, respectively, due to audit settlements and lapses of statutes of limitations.

In 2015, the Company recorded a pension-related litigation charge of $100 million with a related tax benefit of $39 million. This litigation charge reduced the overall effective rate because it reduced the proportion of the Company’s worldwide income taxed in the United States, where the tax rates are the highest.

Excluding the reserve releases in 2015 and in 2014 and the effect of the pension litigation charge, the effective tax rate for 2015 was essentially unchanged as compared with 2014.

The effective tax rate for 2014 was 35.7 percent, as compared with 35.3 percent in 2013. Excluding the reserve releases, the effective tax rate for 2014 increased as compared with 2013 primarily due to the higher proportion of income earned in the United States, which is a higher tax jurisdiction.

Segment Information

The Company’s two reportable segments, Athletic Stores and Direct-to-Customers, are based on its method of internal reporting. The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, the primary financial measure of which is division results. Division profit reflects income before income taxes, pension litigation charge, corporate expense, non-operating income, and net interest expense.

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Sales
               
Athletic Stores $6,468  $6,286  $5,790 
Direct-to-Customers  944   865   715 
   $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Operating Results
               
Athletic Stores $872  $777  $656 
Direct-to-Customers  142   109   84 
Division profit  1,014   886   740 
Less: Pension litigation charge  100       
Less: Corporate expense  77   81   76 
Operating profit  837   805   664 
Other income  4   9   4 
Earnings before interest expense and income taxes  841   814   668 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
Income before income taxes $837  $809  $663 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Athletic Stores

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Sales $6,468  $6,286  $5,790 
$ Change $182  $496      
% Change  2.9%   8.6     
Division profit $872  $777  $656 
Division profit margin  13.5%   12.4  11.3

2015 compared with 2014

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, sales from the Athletic Stores segment increased 8.6 percent. Comparable-store sales increased by 7.6 percent. Foot Locker Europe and Foot Locker Asia Pacific led the comparable-stores sales increase. Foot Locker Europe generated double digit comparable-store gains in footwear, apparel, and accessories. The increase in footwear was primarily related to sales of classic court styles, lifestyle running, and men’s basketball. Apparel sales experienced gains in both the branded and private label categories.

The strong performance internationally was partially offset by the underperformance of the Runners Point and Sidestep stores. The sales decline at our Runners Point and Sidestep stores reflected the continued segmentation process and the overreliance on a few key running styles. Our segmentation process includes better defining product offerings and executing upon our multi-banner strategy in the European market. We are broadening the assortment in the Runners Point stores beyond performance running to include more lifestyle running products, while the Sidestep stores are being shifted to lifestyle and casual footwear. We continue to refine this segmentation strategy, which we believe will position these banners to contribute to our further success in Europe.

Domestically, sales increases were led by Foot Locker and Kids Foot Locker with all formats generating a comparable-store sales increase. Running and basketball were the strongest drivers of footwear sales. The Jordan brand, as well as the rise of new marquee styles contributed to the growth in the basketball category. Children’s footwear sales also performed well across all of the divisions. Sales continue to benefit from the expansion of shop-in-shop partnerships with our key vendors. The Company opened more than 40 shop-in-shops during the year, including 21 House of Hoops shops in partnership with Nike.

While Lady Foot Locker/SIX:02’s overall sales declined slightly in 2015, the combined banners produced a mid-single digit comparable-store sales gain, the seventh consecutive quarter with a comparable-store sales gain. The comparable-store gain was led by both footwear and apparel, partially offset by a decline in accessories. The overall sales decline reflects 42 Lady Foot Locker store closures, partially offset by the opening of 15 SIX:02 stores during the year. The SIX:02 banner provides the female customer with elevated, athletic-inspired product assortments featuring top brands. During 2015, we continued to work with our vendors to refine this assortment to include more fashion styles. This initiative, as well other actions to promote brand development, will continue into 2016.

Champs Sports generated a low single digit comparable-store sales increase driven by gains in footwear sales partially offset by declines in apparel and accessories. The decline in apparel primarily reflects the continuation of the customer’s shift away from licensed apparel.

Division profit increased by $95 million to $872 million in 2015 as compared with last year reflecting higher sales and an improved gross margin rate. Variable expenses, such as store wages, were also diligently managed, resulting in an improved SG&A rate. Due to the underperformance of the Runners Point and Sidestep stores during 2015, an impairment review was performed. The review resulted in an impairment charge totaling $4 million, which was recorded to write down long-lived assets such as store fixtures and leasehold improvements for 61 stores.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

2014 compared with 2013

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, primarily related to the euro and Canadian dollar, sales from the Athletic Stores segment increased by 9.4 percent in 2014. Comparable-store sales increased by 6.7 percent. This segment included $133 million of incremental sales related to the Runners Point stores, which were acquired in early July 2013. Excluding the sales of the Runners Point stores, the comparable-store gain was primarily driven by Kids Foot Locker, Foot Locker U.S., Footaction, and Foot Locker Europe. While Lady Foot Locker’s overall sales declined in 2014, the banner generated a comparable-store gain for the year. The shift into more performance oriented assortments has resonated with our customers, as both footwear and apparel grew on a comparable-store basis. The overall Lady Foot Locker sales decrease in 2014 primarily reflected a net decline of 44 stores.

Basketball, running, and children’s footwear were strong drivers of sales increases. Sales of basketball footwear were driven by Jordan and key marquee player styles, while running shoes from Nike and Adidas had strong results. Additionally, children’s footwear continued to perform well across multiple divisions. Apparel sales were challenging primarily in Foot Locker Europe and Champs Sports, as customers have shifted away from certain lifestyle and licensed apparel programs, which had previously driven strong results. This segment benefitted from strong banner differentiation, which has created unique store designs and product assortments which have resonated with customers and enhanced the shopping experience.

Included in 2014 division profit was a $1 million impairment charge related to the write-down of a trade name for our stores operating in the Republic of Ireland, reflecting historical and projected underperformance. Additionally, a $1 million charge was recorded to fully write down the value of a private-label brand acquired as part of the Runners Point Group acquisition, as a result of exiting the product line. The overall division profit improvement in 2014 primarily reflected higher sales, an improved gross margin rate, and effective control over variable expenses, such as store wages.

Direct-to-Customers

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Sales $944  $865  $715 
$ Change $79  $150      
% Change  9.1%   21.0     
Division profit $142  $109  $84 
Division profit margin  15.0%   12.6  11.7

2015 compared with 2014

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, sales of the Direct-to-Customers segment increased 10.6 percent as compared with the prior year, while comparable sales increased by 14.4 percent. The increase was primarily a result of continued strong sales performance of the Company’s domestic store-banner websites, as well as growth in our international ecommerce business, particularly in Europe. Of the total increase, sales from our U.S. store-banner websites comprised the majority of the increase. The growth in ecommerce reflects the continued elevation of the connection between the in-store experience and the banner websites, as well as the development of features and functionality to deliver an enhanced digital experience. These increases were partially offset by the 2014 closure of the CCS direct business. The strongest category for this segment was footwear, led by basketball and casual styles. Apparel increased slightly as compared with the prior year, which primarily reflected gains in the branded apparel category.

This segment generated a division profit increase of $33 million as compared with 2014, which represented a division profit margin improvement of 240 basis points. The increase was the result of strong flow-through of sales to profit, resulting from improved gross margins due to more full-price selling and effective expense management. The improvement in gross margin was due, in part, to the fact that 2014 was negatively affected by the liquidation of the CCS merchandise. Division profit in 2015 included a $1 million impairment charge to write down the value of the SP24.com ecommerce trade name, which was acquired with the Runners Point Group. SP24.com is a clearance website that has been deemphasized as we focus on full-priced selling on the websites aligned with the stores banners.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

2014 compared with 2013

Comparable sales increased 17.8 percent as compared to 2013, led by basketball and running footwear. The Direct-to-Customers segment included $18 million of incremental sales related to the ecommerce division of Runners Point Group, which the Company acquired during the second quarter of 2013. Excluding those sales, the increase was primarily a result of continued strong sales performance related to the Company’s store-banner websites both in the U.S. and in Europe, as well as increased Eastbay sales. Of the total increase, sales from our U.S. store-banner websites comprised the majority of the increase, which reflected the continued success of several initiatives, including the improvement of connectivity of the store banners to the ecommerce sites, enhancements to the mobile ecommerce sites, investments in technology to improve the shopping experience, and investments in making the sites more engaging. These increases were offset, in part, by a decline in the CCS business, which transitioned to the Eastbay banner during the third quarter of 2014.

Division profit increased by $25 million as compared to 2013, representing a division profit margin improvement of increased marketing90 basis points. The 2014 results included a $2 million impairment charge related to the CCS business, which was triggered by the Company’s decision to transition the skate business to the Eastbay banner. Gross margin was negatively affected by the liquidation of the CCS merchandise and advertising spending.the effects of providing additional free shipping offers. Notwithstanding this, the increase in division profit was the result of strong flow-through of sales to profit and good expense management.

Corporate Expense

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Corporate expense $77  $81  $76 
$ Change $(4)  $5      

Corporate expense consists of unallocated general and administrative expenses as well as depreciation and amortization related to the Company’s corporate headquarters, centrally managed departments, unallocated insurance and benefit programs, certain foreign exchange transaction gains and losses, and other items. Depreciation and amortization included in corporate expense was $13$11 million, $11$13 million, and $12 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively.

Corporate expense increaseddecreased by $6 million to $108$4 million in 20122015 as compared with 2011. The increase represents increased depreciationthe prior year. Depreciation and amortization included in corporate expense decreased by $2 million. The annual adjustment of $2 million, $2the allocation of corporate expense to the operating divisions reduced corporate expense by $5 million. These decreases were offset by $3 million of increased share-based compensation expense, and a chargecosts incurred in late 2015 relating to the spring 2016 relocation of $4 million related to litigation, offset, in part, by expense savings in otherour corporate areas. The effect of the 53rd week on corporate expense was not significant.headquarters within New York City.

Corporate expense increased by $5 million to $102 million in 20112014 as compared with 2010. The2013. This increase was primarily represents higher share-basedrelated to incentive compensation expense and miscellaneous professional fees.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Depreciationlegal costs, which increased $8 million and Amortization

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Depreciation expense $118  $110  $106 
Percentage increase (decrease)  7.3  3.8  (5.4)% 

Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations,$2 million, respectively. Additionally, depreciation and amortization included in corporate expense for 2012 increased by $10 million or by 9.1 percent as compared with 2011. The$1 million. These increases in both 2012 and 2011 reflect increased capital spending.

Interest Expense, Net

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Interest expense $11  $13  $14 
Interest income  (6  (7  (5
Interest expense, net $5  $6  $9 
Weighted-average interest rate (excluding fees)  7.6  7.6  7.6

The overall reduction in net interest expense in 2012 as compared with 2011 primarily reflected lower expenses associated with the Company’s revolving credit facility, which was amended at the end of 2011 with lower annual fees.

The overall reduction in net interest expense in 2011 as compared with 2010 primarily reflected increased income earned on higher cash and cash equivalent balances.

The Company did not have any short-term borrowings for any of the periods presented.

Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for 2012 was 34.6 percent, as compared with 36.0 percent in 2011. The Company regularly assesses the adequacy of the provisions for income tax contingencies in accordance with the applicable authoritative guidance on accounting for income taxes. As a result, the reserves for unrecognized tax benefits may be adjusted as a result of new facts and developments, such as changes to interpretations of relevant tax law, assessments from taxing authorities, settlements with taxing authorities, and lapses of statutes of limitation. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company settled one of its foreign tax audits resulting in a reserve release of $9 million. The effective tax rate for 2012 also includes other reserve releases totaling $4 million due to audit settlements and lapses of statutes of limitations primarily in foreign jurisdictions. Additionally, included in 2012 are one-time benefits totaling $4 million, representing foreign tax law changes of $2 million, additional U.S. tax credits of $1 million, and a $1 million benefit related to a Canadian provincial tax rate change that increased the value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets. Excluding these items, as well as the prior-year adjustments discussed below, the effective tax rate increased primarily due to the higher proportion of income earned in the United States, which bears a higher tax rate.

The effective tax rate for 2011 was 36.0 percent, as compared with 34.3 percent in 2010. The effective tax rate for 2011 includes reserve releases of $3 million due to audit settlements and lapses of statutes of limitations, as well as other true-up adjustments. Also, the 2010 effective rate included a benefit of $7 million from a favorable tax settlement offset, in part, by a $4 million charge to correct the taxes included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Excluding these items, the effective tax rate increased primarily due to the higher proportion of income earned in higher tax jurisdictions in 2011.

Segment Information

The Company’s two reportable segments, Athletic Stores and Direct-to-Customers, are based on its method of internal reporting. The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, the primary financial measure of which is division results. Division profit reflects income before income taxes, corporate expense, non-operating income, and net interest expense.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Athletic Stores

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Sales $5,568  $5,110  $4,617 
Division profit $653  $495  $329 
Division profit margin  11.7  9.7  7.1

2012 compared with 2011

Athletic Stores sales of $5,568 million increased 9.0 percent in 2012. Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, primarily related to the euro, sales from the Athletic Stores segment increased by 10.6 percent in 2012. Comparable-store sales increased by 8.5 percent. Most divisions within this segment experienced strong increases as compared with the prior year, led by Champs Sports and domestic Foot Locker. Foot Locker Europe had a modest comparable-store sales decline for the year reflecting the macroeconomic conditions in that region. Lady Foot Locker’s sales declined in 2012 reflecting losses from certain classic and lifestyle footwear,were partially offset by an increase in performance footwear. Additionally, Lady Foot Locker operated 29 fewer stores as management has continuedthe annual adjustment to focus on closing underperforming stores. Comparable-store sales for the division were down slightly forallocation of corporate expense to the year. Management has continued to review the women’s businessoperating divisions, which reduced corporate expense by $4 million. In addition, acquisition and has implemented various initiatives intended to improve future performance, such as transitioning merchandise assortments to target the active, performance-oriented woman and a new store design, which is currently being tested in 14 Lady Foot Locker locations. During 2012, the Company introduced a new banner, SIX:02, an elevated retail concept featuring top brands in fitness apparel and athletic footwear for women. The Company opened 3 SIX:02 stores during the fourth quarter of 2012 and plans to open 4 additional stores in 2013. Management currently believes that these initiatives will improve the performance of the women’s category over time, as the tests are studied and the actions are refined across all stores. In total, all categories, footwear, apparel and accessories, increased during 2012. Within the footwear, the highest percentage increase came from our kids’ category, which had strong gains across all banners, supported by the “Go Big” marketing campaign. Footwear sales increased in our largest category, basketball, which benefitted from key marquee player shoes. Despite the overall decline in Lady Foot Locker sales, our overall women’s business modestly increased, as some of those customers found appealing product in our other banners. Apparel sales reflected strength in domestic sales, partially offset by a slight decline in Europe’s apparel sales.

Athletic Stores reported a division profit of $653 million in 2012 as compared with $495 million in 2011, an increase of $158 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012 an impairment charge of $5 million was recorded to write down long-lived assets of the CCS stores, as a result of the Company’s decision to close these stores during the first quarter of 2013. Foreign currency fluctuations negatively affected division profit by approximately $9 million as compared with the corresponding prior-year period. Division profit increased primarily as a result of strong sales and an improved gross margin rate driven by improved leverage of the fixed expenses within gross margin, contributing to an overall profit flow-through of 34.5 percent.

2011 compared with 2010

Athletic Stores sales of $5,110 million increased 10.7 percent in 2011, as compared with $4,617 million in 2010. Excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, primarilyintegration costs related to the euro, sales from the Athletic Stores segment increased by 8.9 percentRunners Point Group were $4 million less in 2011. Comparable-store sales also increased 8.9 percent as compared with the prior year. The majority of the increase represented increased footwear sales reflecting the continued success of key styles of technical, light-weight running, and basketball footwear. Apparel sales continued to benefit from offerings that coordinated with key footwear styles. All formats within this segment experienced significant increases2014 than in sales as compared with the prior year, except for Lady Foot Locker. While Foot Locker Europe’s comparable-stores sales were positive for the fourth quarter and full-year of 2011, sales were negatively affected by the economic conditions. Lady Foot Locker’s sales declined in 2011, principally due to operating 47 fewer stores. This was coupled with a decline in toning footwear sales, which negatively affected the results in the first part of the year.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Athletic Stores reported a division profit of $495 million in 2011 as compared with $329 million in 2010, an increase of $166 million as compared with the corresponding prior-year period. Foreign currency fluctuations positively affected division profit by approximately $8 million as compared with the corresponding prior-year period. The increase primarily reflects the strong U.S. performance, led by Foot Locker and Champs Sports, however all international locations also increased. Strong sales and improved gross margin contributed to an overall profit flow-through of 33.7 percent.

Direct-to-Customers

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Sales $614  $513  $432 
Division profit $65  $45  $30 
Division profit margin  10.6  8.8  6.9

2012 compared with 2011

Direct-to-Customers sales increased 19.7 percent to $614 million in 2012, as compared with $513 million in 2011. On a comparable 52 week basis, sales increased 17.7 percent. The increase was primarily a result of continued strong sales performance for the Company’s store-banner websites, as well as increased Eastbay sales. Of the total increase, sales from our store-banner websites comprised approximately 60 percent of the increase. We continue to invest in our websites in order to provide excellent service in our digital channels, including easy navigation, timely shipping, helpful call center assistance, and entertaining and engaging content.

The Direct-to-Customers business generated division profit of $65 million in 2012, as compared with $45 million in 2011. Division profit, as a percentage of sales, was 10.6 percent in 2012 and 8.8 percent in 2011. During the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011, impairment charges of $7 million and $5 million, respectively, were recorded to write down CCS intangible assets, specifically the non-amortizing tradename. The 2012 impairment was primarily the result of continued reductions in revenue projections, coupled with a decrease in the assumed royalty rate as a result of lower profitability. Excluding the impairment charges in each of the periods, division profit increased by $22 million reflecting the strong sales performance and a lower expense rate.

2011 compared with 2010

Direct-to-Customers sales increased 18.8 percent to $513 million in 2011, as compared with $432 million in 2010. Sales primarily reflected the strong performance of the Eastbay website, coupled with improved sales from the store-banner websites.

The Direct-to-Customers business generated division profit of $45 million in 2011, as compared with $30 million in 2010. Division profit, as a percentage of sales, was 8.8 percent in 2011 and 6.9 percent in 2010. During the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2010, impairment charges of $5 million and $10 million, respectively, were recorded to write down the CCS non-amortizing tradename. The impairments were primarily the result of reduced revenue projections. Excluding the impairment charges in each of the periods, division profit increased by $10 million reflecting the strong sales performance, partially offset by higher variable costs.2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

The Company’s primary source of liquidity has been cash flow from operations,earnings, while the principal uses of cash have been to:been: to fund inventory and other working capital requirements; to finance capital expenditures related to store openings, store remodelings, Internet and mobile sites, information systems, and other support facilities; to make retirement plan contributions, quarterly dividend payments, and interest payments; and to fund other cash requirements to support the development of its short-term and long-term operating strategies.

The Company generally finances real estate with operating leases. Management believes its cash, cash equivalents, and future cash flow from operations and the Company’s current revolving credit facility will be adequate to fund these requirements.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, the Company had $543$1,021 million of cash and cash equivalents, of which $608 million was held in foreign jurisdictions. Because we plan to permanently reinvest our foreign earnings, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we have not provided for U.S. federal and state income taxes or foreign withholding taxes that may result from potential future remittances of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. Depending on the source, amount, and timing of a repatriation, some tax may be payable. The Company believes that its cash invested domestically and future domestic cash flows and its current revolving credit agreement are sufficient to satisfy domestic requirements.

The Company may also from time to time repurchase its common stock or seek to retire or purchase outstanding debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise. Such repurchases and retirement of debt, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors. The amounts involved may be material. As of January 30, 2016, approximately $637 million remained available under the Company’s current $1 billion share repurchase program.

On February 20, 2013,17, 2016, the Board of Directors approveddeclared a new 3-year, $600 millionquarterly dividend of $0.275 per share repurchase program extending through Januaryto be paid on April 29, 2016, replacingrepresenting a 10 percent increase over the Company’s previous $400quarterly per share amount.

As discussed further in theLegal Proceedings note under “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $100 million program which terminated($61 million after-tax) in 2015. In light of the uncertainties involved in this matter, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution will not differ from the amount currently accrued by the Company. The $100 million charge has been classified as a long-term liability due to the uncertainty involved with the resolution of this litigation, as the appeals process can be lengthy. The pension plan is sufficiently funded to absorb a $100 million liability and, accordingly, we do not anticipate the need to make any additional pension contributions in the near term in connection with this matter. The timing and the amount of any future contributions to the pension plan are dependent on that date.the funded status of the plan and various other factors, such as interest rates and the performance of the plan’s assets.

Any material adverse change in customer demand, fashion trends, competitive market forces, or customer acceptance of the Company’s merchandise mix and retail locations, uncertainties related to the effect of competitive products and pricing, the Company’s reliance on a few key vendorssuppliers for a significant portion of its merchandise purchases and risks associated with global product sourcing, economic conditions worldwide, the effects of currency fluctuations, as well as other factors listed under the heading “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” could affect the ability of the Company to continue to fund its needs from business operations.

Maintaining access to merchandise that the Company considers appropriate for its business may be subject to the policies and practices of its key vendors.suppliers. Therefore, the Company believes that it is critical to continue to maintain satisfactory relationships with its key vendors.suppliers. In 20122015 and 2011,2014, the Company purchased approximately 8690 percent and 8289 percent, respectively, of its merchandise from its top five vendorssuppliers and expects to continue to obtain a significant percentage of its athletic product from these vendorssuppliers in future periods. Approximately 6572 percent in 20122015 and 6173 percent in 20112014 was purchased from one vendorsupplier — Nike, Inc.

The Company’s 20132016 planned capital expenditures and lease acquisition costs are approximately $220$297 million. Planned capital expenditures are $217$292 million and planned lease acquisition costs related to the Company’s operations in Europe are $3$5 million. The Company’s planned capital expenditures include $173reflect $210 million related to modernizationsfocused on elevating the customer’s in-store experience. It also includes the remodeling and expansion of over 250 existing stores, and the planned opening of 73 newapproximately 90 stores primarily related to Kids Foot Locker in the U.S. and Europe, as well as $44the continued expansion of the Foot Locker banner in Europe. Planned spending for 2016 also includes $82 million for the development of information systems, including a new ecommerce order management system, websites, infrastructure, and infrastructure.costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters within New York City. The Company has the ability to revise and reschedule much of the anticipated capital expenditure program, should the Company’s financial position require it.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP measure)

In addition to net cash provided by operating activities, the Company uses free cash flow as a useful measure of performance and as an indication of the strength of the Company and its ability to generate cash. The Company defines free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures (which is classified as an investing activity). The Company believes the presentation of free cash flow is relevant and useful for investors because it allows investors to evaluate the cash generated from the Company'sCompany’s underlying operations in a manner similar to the method used by management.

Free cash flow is not defined under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, it should not be considered a substitute for income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. It should not be inferred that the entire free cash flow amount is available for discretionary expenditures.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company'sCompany’s net cash flow provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, to free cash flow.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities $416  $497  $326  $745  $712  $530 
Capital expenditures  (163  (152  (97  (228)   (190  (206
Free cash flow (non-GAAP) $253  $345  $229  $517  $522  $324 

Operating Activities

Operating

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities $745  $712  $530 
$ Change $33  $182      

The amount provided by operating activities provided cash of $416 million in 2012, compared with $497 million in 2011. These amounts reflectreflects income adjusted for non-cash items and working capital changes. Non-cash impairment and other charges were $12 million, $5 million, and $10 millionAdjustments to net income for the years ending February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, respectively. Thesenon-cash items include non-cash impairment charges, weredepreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, share-based compensation expense and related totax benefits.

The improvements in both 2015 and 2014 represented the CCS business.Company’s earnings strength and working capital improvements. During 2012,2015, the Company contributed $26$4 million to its U.S. and Canadian qualified pension plans as compared with $28$6 million contributed in 2011. The increase in merchandise inventories for 2012 was due to the shift caused by the 53rd week, which was planned in order to support sales for February, which is typically a strong period.

Operating activities provided cash of $497 million in 2011 as compared with $326 million in 2010. Non-cash impairment and other charges were $5 million and $10 million for the years ending January 28, 2012 and January 29, 2011, respectively, reflecting the CCS tradename impairment charges. During 2011, the Company contributed $28 million to its U.S. and Canadian qualified pension plans as compared with $32plan in 2014. Pension contributions were $2 million contributed in 2010.2013. The changeamounts and timing of pension contributions are dependent on several factors, including asset performance. Cash paid for income taxes was $283 million, $251 million, and $175 million for 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

Investing Activities

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Net cash used in investing activities $230  $176  $248 
$ Change $54  $(72     

Capital expenditures in merchandise inventories, net2015 were $228 million, an increase of the change in accounts payable, as$38 million compared with the prior-year period, reflects the continued improvement in flowing merchandise. The change in income tax receivables and payablesprior year. Current year capital expenditures primarily reflects the receipt of a $46 million IRS refund resulting from a loss carryback.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $212 million in 2012 as compared with $149 million in 2011. The increase was primarily duerelated to the Company’s net purchasesremodeling of $49 million209 stores, the build-out of short-term investments as well as higher capital expenditures.111 new stores, preparing for our corporate headquarters relocation within New York City, and other corporate technology projects. Capital expenditures in 2014 were $163$190 million, primarily related to the remodeling of 198319 stores, the build-out of 8586 new stores, and various corporate technology upgrades and ecommerce website enhancements, representing an increaseupgrades. This was a decrease of $11$16 million as compared with 2013, as the prior year.timing of certain projects shifted to 2015. As of the end of fiscal 2015, approximately 30 percent of our domestic Foot Locker and Champs Sports stores and approximately 20 percent of the Footaction stores have been remodeled to the current store format.

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company completed an asset acquisition for $2 million involving 10 previously franchised Runners Point and Sidestep stores in Switzerland.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2014, the Company sold real estate for proceeds of $5 million and recorded a gain on sale of $4 million. In 2011, net cash used in investing activities was $149 million as compared with $87addition, maturities of short-term investments totaled $9 million in 2010. Capital expenditures were $1522014. This compares with net sales and maturities of short-term investments of $37 million primarily related toduring 2013. The activity during 2013 included the remodelingpurchase of 182 stores, the build-outRunners Point Group for $81 million, net of 70 new stores, and various corporate technology upgrades and ecommerce website enhancements, representing an increase of $55 million as compared with the prior year. During 2010, the Company received $9 million from The Reserve International Liquidity Fund representing the final distribution.cash acquired.

Financing Activities

Net cash

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Net cash used in financing activities $456  $401  $309 
$ Change $55  $92      

Cash used in financing activities was $181 million in 2012consists primarily of the Company’s return to shareholders initiatives, including its share repurchase program and cash dividend payments, as compared with $178 million in 2011. follows:

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Share repurchases $419  $305  $229 
Dividends paid on common stock  139   127   118 
Total returned to shareholders $558  $432  $347 

During 2012,2015, 2014, and 2013, the Company repurchased 4,000,1616,693,100 shares, 5,888,698 shares, and 6,424,286 shares of its common stock under its common share repurchase program for $129 million.programs, respectively. Additionally, the Company declared and paid dividends totaling $109 million and $101 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, representing a quarterly rate of $0.18$0.25, $0.22, and $0.165$0.20 per share in 20122015, 2014, and 2011,2013, respectively. During 2012 and 2011,

Offsetting the Companyamounts above were proceeds received proceeds from the issuance of common stock and treasury stock in connection with the employee stock programs of $48$69 million, $22 million, and $22$30 million for 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. In connection with stock option exercises, the Company recorded excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation of $11$35 million, $12 million, and $5$9 million for 20122015, 2014, and 2011,2013, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net cash used inThe financing activities was $178activity also includes payments on capital lease obligations of $2 million, in 2011 as compared with $127 million in 2010. During 2011, the Company repurchased 4,904,100 shares of its common stock under its common share repurchase program for $104 million. Additionally, the Company declared and paid dividends totaling $101$3 million, and $93$1 million in 2011for 2015, 2014, and 2010, respectively, representing a quarterly rate of $0.165 and $0.15 per share in 2011 and 2010,2013, respectively. During 2011 and 2010, the Company received proceeds from the issuance of common stock and treasury stockThese obligations were recorded in connection with the employee stock programsacquisition of $22 million and $13 million, respectively. In connection with stock option exercises, the Company recorded excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation of $5 million and $3 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively.Runners Point Group.

Capital Structure

On January 27, 2012, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2011 Restated Credit Agreement”) with its banks. The 2011 Restated Credit Agreement provides for a $200 million asset based revolving credit facility maturing on January 27, 2017. In addition, during the term of the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement, the Company may make up to four requests for additional credit commitments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $200 million. Interest is based on the LIBOR rate in effect at the time of the borrowing plus a 1.25 to 1.50 percent margin depending on certain provisions as defined in the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement.

The 2011 Restated Credit Agreement provides for a security interest in certain of the Company’s domestic assets, including certain inventory assets, but excluding intellectual property. The Company is not required to comply with any financial covenants as long as there are no outstanding borrowings. With regard to the payment of dividends and share repurchases, there are no restrictions if the Company is not borrowing and the payments are funded through cash on hand. If the Company is borrowing, Availability as of the end of each fiscal month during the subsequent projected six fiscal months following the payment must be at least 20 percent of the lesser of the Aggregate Commitments and the Borrowing Base (all terms as defined in the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement). The Company’s management currently does not currently expect to borrow under the facility in 2013,2016, other than amounts used to support standby letters of credit.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Credit Rating

As of April 1, 2013,March 24, 2016, the Company’s corporate credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service are BB+ and Ba2,Ba1, respectively. In addition, Moody’s Investors Service has rated the Company’s senior unsecured notes Ba3.Ba2.

Debt Capitalization and Equity (non-GAAP Measure)

For purposes of calculating debt to total capitalization, the Company includes the present value of operating lease commitments in total net debt. Total net debt including the present value of operating leases is considered a non-GAAP financial measure. The present value of operating leases is discounted using various interest rates ranging from 4.02.5 percent to 14.5 percent, which represent the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at inception of the lease. Operating leases are the primary financing vehicle used to fund store expansion and, therefore, we believe that the inclusion of the present value of operating leases in total debt is useful to our investors, credit constituencies, and rating agencies.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth the components of the Company’s capitalization, both with and without the present value of operating leases:

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Long-term debt $133  $135 
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases $130  $134 
Present value of operating leases  2,202   1,905   3,192   2,745 
Total debt including the present value of operating leases  2,335   2,040   3,322   2,879 
Less:
                    
Cash and cash equivalents  880   851   1,021   967 
Short-term investments  48    
Total net debt including the present value of operating leases  1,407   1,189   2,301   1,912 
Shareholders’ equity  2,377   2,110   2,553   2,496 
Total capitalization $3,784  $3,299  $4,854  $4,408 
Total net debt capitalization percent      —%   
Total net debt capitalization percent including the present value of operating leases (non-GAAP)  37.2  36.0  47.4%   43.4

The Company increasedCompany’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investmentsincreased by $77$54 million during 2012,2015, which was the result of strong cash flow generation from operating activities. The change in total debt including the present value of the operating leases, as compared with the prior-year period, primarily reflects the effect of lease renewals and the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, offset, in part, by store closures. Including the present value of operating leases, the Company’s net debt capitalization percent increased 120400 basis points in 2012.2015, reflecting the effect of lease renewals and the obligation associated with the New York City office headquarters, partially offset by foreign exchange fluctuations.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following tables represent the scheduled maturities of the Company’s contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments at February 2, 2013:January 30, 2016:

          
  Payments Due by Fiscal Period Payments Due by Fiscal Period
Contractual Cash Obligations Total 2013 2014 – 2015 2016 – 2017 2018 and Beyond Total 2016 2017 – 2018 2019 – 2020 2021 and Beyond
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Long-term debt(1) $217  $11  $22  $22  $162  $184  $11  $22  $22  $129 
Operating leases(2)  2,913   513   880   640   880   4,105   574   1,032   851   1,648 
Capital leases  1   1          
Other long-term liabilities(3)                 25   25          
Total contractual cash obligations $3,130  $524  $902  $662  $1,042  $4,315  $611  $1,054  $873  $1,777 
Other Commercial Commitments
                         
Purchase commitments(4)  2,524   2,524          
Other(5)  34   22   10   2    
Total commercial commitments $2,558  $2,546  $10  $2  $ 

(1)The amounts presented above represent the contractual maturities of the Company’s long-term debt, including interest; however, it excludes the unamortized gain of the interest rate swap of $15$11 million. Additional information is included in theLong-Term Debtand Obligations Under Capital Leasesnote under “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
(2)The amounts presented represent the future minimum lease payments under non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating leases. In addition to minimum rent, certain of the Company’s leases require the payment of additional costs for insurance, maintenance, and other costs. These costs have historically represented approximately 2520 to 30 percent of the minimum rent amount. These additional amounts are not included in the table of contractual commitments as the timing and/or amounts of such payments are unknown.
(3)The Company’s other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 primarily comprise pension and postretirement benefits, deferred rent liability, income taxes, workers’ compensation and general liability reserves, and various other accruals. In addition,The amount presented in the table represents the Company’s 2016 U.S. qualified pension contribution of $25 million. Other than this liability, other amounts (including the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits of $54$36 million, as well as penalties and interest of $3$2 million) have been excluded from the above table as the timing and/or amount of any cash payment is uncertain. The timing of the remaining amounts that are known has not been included as they are minimal and not useful to the presentation. Additional information is included in theOther Liabilities, Financial Instruments and Risk Management, andRetirement Plans and Other Benefits notes under “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

     
 Total Amounts Committed Payments Due by Fiscal Period
Other Commercial Commitments 2013 2014 – 2015 2016 – 2017 2018 and Beyond
   (in millions)
Unused line of credit(4) $199  $  $  $199  $ 
Standby letters of credit  1         1    
Purchase commitments(5)  2,042   2,042          
Other(6)  18   12   5   1    
Total commercial commitments $2,260  $2,054  $5  $201  $ 

(4)Represents the unused domestic lines of credit pursuant to the Company’s $200 million revolving credit agreement. The Company’s management currently does not expect to borrow under the facility in 2013, other than amounts used to support standby letters of credit.
(5)Represents open purchase orders, as well as other commitments for merchandise purchases, at February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. The Company is obligated under the terms of purchase orders; however, the Company is generally able to renegotiate the timing and quantity of these orders with certain vendorssuppliers in response to shifts in consumer preferences.
(6)(5)Represents payments required by non-merchandise purchase agreements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing (other thanmajority of the Company’s contractual obligations relate to operating leases entered intofor our stores. Future scheduled lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of January 30, 2016 are described in the normal course of business as disclosed above) or unconsolidated special purpose entities. table underContractual Obligations and Commitmentsabove and with additional information in theLeasesnote in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

The Company does not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including variable interest entities. The Company’sOur policy prohibits the use of derivatives for which there is no underlying exposure.

In connection with the sale of various businesses and assets, the Company may be obligated for certain lease commitments transferred to third parties and pursuant to certain normal representations, warranties, or indemnifications entered into with the purchasers of such businesses or assets. Although the maximum potential amounts for such obligations cannot be readily determined, management believes that the resolution of such contingencies will not significantly affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations. The Company is also operating certain stores for which lease agreements are in the process of being negotiated with landlords. Although there is no contractual commitment to make these payments, it is likely that leases will be executed.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s responsibility for integrity and objectivity in the preparation and presentation of the Company’s financial statements requires diligent application of appropriate accounting policies. Generally, the Company’s accounting policies and methods are those specifically required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Included in theSummary of Significant Accounting Policiesnote in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”Data�� is a summary of the Company’s most significant accounting policies.

In some cases, management is required to calculate amounts based on estimates for matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes the following to be the most critical of those accounting policies that necessitate subjective judgments.

Merchandise Inventories and Cost of Sales

Merchandise inventories for the Company’s Athletic Stores are valued at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method (“RIM”). The RIM is commonly used by retail companies to value inventories at cost and calculate gross margins due to its practicality. Under the retail method, cost is determined by applying a cost-to-retail percentage across groupings of similar items, known as departments. The cost-to-retail percentage is applied to ending inventory at its current owned retail valuation to determine the cost of ending inventory on a department basis. The RIM is a system of averages that requires management’s estimates and assumptions regarding markups, markdowns and shrink, among others, and as such, could result in distortions of inventory amounts.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Significant judgmentJudgment is required for these estimates and assumptions, as well as to differentiate between promotional and other markdowns that may be required to correctly reflect merchandise inventories at the lower of cost or market. The Company provides reserves based on current selling prices when the inventory has not been marked down to market. The failure to take permanent markdowns on a timely basis may result in an overstatement of cost under the retail inventory method. The decision to take permanent markdowns includes many factors, including the current retail environment, inventory levels, and the age of the item. Management believes this method and its related assumptions, which have been consistently applied, to be reasonable.

Vendor Reimbursements

In the normal course of business, the Company receives allowances from its vendors for markdowns taken. Vendor allowances are recognized as a reduction in cost of sales in the period in which the markdowns are taken. Vendor allowances contributed 30 basis points to the 2012 gross margin rate. The Company also has volume-related agreements with certain vendors, under which it receives rebates based on fixed percentages of cost purchases. These volume-related rebates are recorded in cost of sales when the product is sold and were not significant to the 2012 gross margin rate.

The Company receives support from some of its vendors in the form of reimbursements for cooperative advertising and catalog costs for the launch and promotion of certain products. The reimbursements are agreed upon with vendors for specific advertising campaigns and catalogs. Cooperative income, to the extent that it reimburses specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to date, is recorded in SG&A in the same period as the associated expenses are incurred. Cooperative reimbursements amounted to approximately 19 percent and 13 percent of total advertising and catalog costs, respectively, in 2012. Reimbursements received that are in excess of specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to date are recognized as a reduction to the cost of merchandise and are reflected in cost of sales as the merchandise is sold. Such amounts were not significant in 2012.

Impairment of Long-Lived Tangible Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company recognizesperforms an impairment lossreview when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of long-lived tangible and intangible assets with finite lives may not be recoverable. Management’s policy in determining whether an impairment indicator exists, a triggering event, comprises measurable operating performance criteria at the division level as well as qualitative measures. If an analysis is necessitated by the occurrence of a triggering event, the Company uses assumptions, which are predominately identified from the Company’s strategic long-range plans, in determining theperforming an impairment amount.review. In the calculation of the fair value of long-lived assets, the Company compares the carrying amount of the asset with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company measures the amount of the impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset with its estimated fair value. The estimation of fair value is measured by discounting expected future cash flows at the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital. Management believes its policy is reasonable and is consistently applied. Future expected cash flows are based upon estimates that, if not achieved, may result in significantly different results.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

The During 2015, the Company performsconducted an impairment review of the Runners Point and Sidestep store-level assets, which resulted in an impairment charge of $4 million.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment annually during the first quarter of its goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite livesfiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise and, atarise. The review of impairment consists of either using a minimum, annually. We considerqualitative approach to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the assets is less than their respective carrying values or a two-step impairment test, if necessary.

In performing the qualitative assessment, management considers many factors in evaluating whether the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable, including declines in stock price and market capitalization in relation to the book value of the Company and macroeconomic conditions affecting retail. The Company has chosen to perform this review atIf, based on the beginningresults of each fiscal year, andthe qualitative assessment, it is done inconcluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, additional quantitative impairment testing is performed using a


TABLE OF CONTENTS

two-step approach.test. The initial step requires that the carrying value of each reporting unit be compared with its estimated fair value. The second step — to evaluate goodwill of a reporting unit for impairment — is only required if the carrying value of that reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company useduses a combination of a discounted cash flow approach and a market-based approach to determine the fair value of a reporting unit. The determination of discounted cash flows of the reporting units and assets and liabilities within the reporting units requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, the discount rate, terminal growth rates, earnings before depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures forecasts. The market approach requires judgment and uses one or more methods to compare the reporting unit with similar businesses, business ownership interests, or securities that have been sold. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company evaluatedevaluates the merits of each significant assumption, both individually and in the aggregate, used to determine the fair value of the reporting units, as well as the fair values of the corresponding assets and liabilities within the reporting units.

In 2015, the Company elected to perform its review of goodwill using a qualitative approach, and no reporting units were evaluated using the two-step impairment method. Based on the qualitative assessment performed, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the fair values of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values and that there are no reporting units at risk of impairment. In 2014, the Company elected to perform the first step of the two-step impairment analysis in connection with its annual review. This analysis concluded they are reasonable and are consistent with prior valuations.that the fair value of all the reporting units substantially exceeded their carrying values.

Owned trademarks and tradenamestrade names that have been determined to have indefinite lives are not subject to amortization but are reviewed at least annually for potential impairment. The fair values of purchasedOur impairment evaluation for indefinite-lived intangible assets are estimated and comparedconsists of either a qualitative or quantitative assessment, similar to their carrying values. We estimatethe process for goodwill.

If the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of thesethe indefinite lived intangible assetsis less than its carrying amount, or if we elect to proceed directly to a quantitative assessment, we calculate the fair value using a discounted cash flow method, based on an income approach using the relief-from-royalty method.concept, and compare the fair value to the carrying value to determine if the asset is impaired. This methodology assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a third party would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these types of assets. This approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth and trends, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates, and other variables. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the intangible asset is less than the carrying value.

The Company’s review of goodwill Our 2015 annual assessment using the quantitative method did not result in anyan impairment charges forcharge. However, during the years ended February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, as the fair valuefourth quarter of each of the reporting units substantially exceeds its carrying value.

Related to the CCS tradename, the Company recorded impairment charges of $7 million and $5 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily2015, as a result of reduced revenue projections for this business, coupled with a decrease in the assumed royalty rate as a result of lower profitability. Additionally in 2012, the Companytriggering event, we recorded a long-lived assetan impairment charge for indefinite-lived intangibles of $5 million related to the CCS stores, as a result of the decision to close these stores during the first quarter of 2013.$1 million.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Share-Based Compensation

The Company estimates the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company estimatesBlack-Scholes option pricing valuation model requires the use of subjective assumptions. Changes in these assumptions, listed below, can materially affect the fair value of the options.

Risk-free Interest Rate — The risk-free interest rate is determined using the Federal Reserve nominal rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of options granted using its historical exercise and post-vesting employment termination patterns, which the Company believes are representative of future behavior. Changing the expected term by one year changes the fair value by 8 to 10 percent depending if the change was an increase or decrease to the expected term.award being valued.

Expected Volatility — The Company estimates the expected volatility of its common stock at the grant date using a weighted-average of the Company’s historical volatility and implied volatility from traded options on the Company’s common stock. A 50 basis point change in volatility would havecause a 12 percent change to the fair value.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Expected Term — The risk-free interest rate assumptionexpected term of options granted is determinedestimated using historical exercise and post-vesting employment termination patterns, which the Federal Reserve nominal rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to thoseCompany believes are representative of future behavior. Changing the expected term ofby one year changes the award being valued.fair value by 8 to 9 percent depending on if the change was an increase or decrease, respectively.

Dividend Yield — The expected dividend yield is derived from the Company’s historical experience. A 50 basis point change to the dividend yield would change the fair value by approximately 46 percent. The Company records stock-based

Share-based compensation expense onlyis recorded for those awards expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate based on itsthe Company’s historical pre-vesting forfeiture data, which it believes are representative of future behavior, and periodically will revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

Legal Contingencies

The Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model requiresCompany is exposed to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the useordinary course of subjective assumptions. Changesbusiness. The Company records a liability when a loss is probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The accrual is recorded based on the reasonably estimable loss or range of loss. When no point of loss is more likely than another, we record the lowest amount in the estimated range of loss and disclose the estimated range. In 2015, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $100 million related to its pension plan litigation.

There is significant judgment required in both the probability determination and as to whether an exposure can be reasonably estimated. Management believes the accruals recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements properly reflect loss exposures that are both probable and reasonably estimable. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these assumptions can materially affect the fair value of the options.estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Pension and Postretirement Liabilities

The Company determinesManagement reviews all assumptions used to determine its obligations for pension and postretirement liabilities based upon assumptions related to discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on invested plan assets, salary increases, age, and mortality, among others. Management reviews all assumptions annually with its independent actuaries, taking into consideration existing and future economic conditions and the Company’s intentions with regard to the plans. The assumptions used are:

Long-Term Rate of Return Assumption — The expected rate of return on plan assets is the long-term rate of return expected to be earned on the plans’ assets and is recognized as a component of pension expense. The rate is based on the plans’ weighted-average target asset allocation, as well as historical and future expected performance of those assets. The target asset allocation is selected to obtain an investment return that is sufficient to cover the expected benefit payments and to reduce future contributions by the Company. The expected rate of return on plan assets is reviewed annually and revised, as necessary, to reflect changes in the financial markets and our investment strategy. The weighted-average long-term rate of return used to determine 20122015 pension expense was 6.636.25 percent.

A decrease of 50 basis points in the weighted-average expected long-term rate of return would have increased 20122015 pension expense by approximately $3 million. The actual return on plan assets in a given year typically differs from the expected long-term rate of return, and the resulting gain or loss is deferred and amortized into expense over the average life expectancy of itsthe inactive participants.

Discount Rate — An assumed discount rate is used to measure the present value of future cash flow obligations of the plans and the interest cost component of pension expense and postretirement income. The cash flows are then discounted to their present value and an overall discount rate is determined. In 2011, the Company changed how the discount rate was selected to measure the present value of U.S. benefit obligations from the Citibank Pension Discount curve to Towers Watson’s Bond:Link model. The current discount rate is determined by reference to the Bond:Link interest rate model based upon a portfolio of highly rated U.S. corporate bonds with individual bonds that are theoretically purchased to settle the plan’s anticipated cash outflows. The discount rate selected to measure the present value of the Company’s Canadian benefit obligations was developed by using the plan’s bond portfolio indices, which match the benefit obligations. The weighted-average discount rates used to determine the 20122015 benefit obligations related to the Company’s pension and postretirement plans were 3.79was 4.1 percent for both.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Changing the weighted-average discount rate by 50 basis points would have changed the accumulated benefit obligation of the pension plans at January 30, 2016 by approximately $30 million and 3.70 percent,$33 million, depending on if the change was an increase or decrease, respectively. A decrease of 50 basis points in the weighted-average discount rate would have increased the accumulated benefit obligation of the pension plans at February 2, 2013 by approximately $33 million, and would have increased the accumulated benefit obligation on the postretirement plan by approximately $1 million. Such a decrease would not have significantly changed 20122015 pension expense or postretirement income.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Trend Rate — The Company maintains two postretirement medical plans, one covering certain executive officers and key employees of the Company (“SERP Medical Plan”), and the other covering all other associates. With respect to the SERP Medical Plan, a one percent change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would change this plan’s accumulated benefit obligation by approximately $2 million.

With respect to the postretirement medical plan covering all other associates, there is limited risk to the Company for increases in health care costs since, beginning in 2001, new retirees have assumed the full expected costs and then-existing retirees have assumed all increases in such costs.

Mortality Assumptions — The mortality table used to determine the pension obligation in 2015 and 2014 was the RP 2000 mortality table with generational projection using scale AA for both males and females. This mortality table was chosen after considering alternative tables including the RP 2014 table. We chose the RP 2000 table because it resulted in the closest match to the Company’s actual experience. For the SERP Medical Plan, the mortality assumption was updated to the RPH 2015 table with generational projection using MP 2015, which represents the most recent study from the Society of Actuaries. The RPH 2015 table with generational projection using MP 2014 was used in the prior year.

The Company expects to record postretirement income of approximately $2$1 million and pension expense of approximately $17$20 million in 2013.2016.

Income Taxes

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, deferred tax assets are recognized for tax credit and net operating loss carryforwards, reduced by a valuation allowance, which is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management is required to estimate taxable income for future years by taxing jurisdiction and to use its judgment to determine whether or not to record a valuation allowance for part or all of a deferred tax asset. Estimates of taxable income are based upon the Company’s strategic long-range plans. A one percent change in the Company’s overall statutory tax rate for 20122015 would have resulted in a $7change of $5 million change into the carrying value of the net deferred tax asset and a corresponding charge or credit to income tax expense depending on whether the tax rate change was a decrease or an increase.

The Company has operations in multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. Tax audits by their nature are often complex and can require several years to resolve. Accruals of tax contingencies require management to make estimates and judgments with respect to the ultimate outcome of tax audits. Actual results could vary from these estimates.

The Company expects its 20132016 effective tax rate to approximate 3736.5 percent, excluding the effect of any nonrecurring items that may occur. The actual tax rate will vary depending primarily on the percentagelevel and mix of the Company’s income earned in the United States as compared with its international operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

During 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-08,Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexityDescriptions of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Also during 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income,which requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The implementation of the amended reporting guidance had no effect on our disclosures.

Additionally in 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02,Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset, other than goodwill, is impaired. If an entity concludes, based on an evaluation of all relevant qualitative factors, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, it will not be required to perform a quantitative impairment test for that asset. Entities are required to test indefinite-lived assets for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. This ASU was effective for the Company on February 3, 2013. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Other recently issued accounting pronouncements did not, orprinciples, and the accounting principles adopted by the Company during the year ended January 30, 2016, if any, are not believed by management to, have a material effect onincluded in the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.Summary of Significant Accounting Policiesnote in “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Other than statements of historical facts, all statements which address activities, events, or developments that the Company anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, but not limited to, such things as future capital expenditures, expansion, strategic plans, financial objectives, dividend payments, stock repurchases, growth of the Company’s business and operations, including future cash flows, revenues, and earnings, and other such matters, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and factors which are detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the effects of currency fluctuations, customer demand, fashion trends, competitive market forces, uncertainties related to the effect of competitive products and pricing, customer acceptance of the Company’s merchandise mix and retail locations, the Company’s reliance on a few key vendorssuppliers for a majority of its merchandise purchases (including a significant portion from one key vendor)supplier), cybersecurity breaches, pandemics and similar major health concerns, unseasonable weather, further deterioration of global financial markets, economic conditions worldwide, further deterioration of business and economic conditions, any changes in business, political and economic conditions due to the threat of future terrorist activities in the United States or in other parts of the world and related U.S. military action overseas, the ability of the Company to execute its business and strategic plans effectively with regard to each of its business units, and risks associated with global product sourcing, including political instability, changes in import regulations, and disruptions to transportation services and distribution.

For additional discussion on risks and uncertainties that may affect forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A. Any changes in such assumptions or factors could produce significantly different results. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Information regarding foreign exchange risk management is included in theFinancial Instruments and Risk Managementnote under “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Item 8.Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 8.  Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company for the years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014 are included as part of this Report:

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal Years January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Fiscal Years January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Fiscal Years January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal Years January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Foot Locker, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Foot Locker, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Foot Locker, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Foot Locker, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated April 1, 2013March 24, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 1, 2013March 24, 2016


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales $6,182  $5,623  $5,049 
Cost of sales  4,148   3,827   3,533 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,294   1,244   1,138 
Depreciation and amortization  118   110   106 
Impairment charges  12   5   10 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9 
Other income  (2  (4  (4
    5,575   5,188   4,792 
Income before income taxes  607   435   257 
Income tax expense  210   157   88 
Net income $397  $278  $169 
Basic earnings per share $2.62  $1.81  $1.08 
Weighted-average shares outstanding  151.2   153.0   155.7 
Diluted earnings per share $2.58  $1.80  $1.07 
Weighted-average shares outstanding, assuming dilution  154.0   154.4   156.7 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Net income $397  $278  $169 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
               
Foreign currency translation adjustment:
               
Translation adjustment arising during the period, net of tax  19   (23  11 
Cash flow hedges:
               
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of income tax  4   (2  1 
Pension and postretirement adjustments:
               
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost arising during the year, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $2, ($11), and ($1) million, respectively  1   (16  7 
Amortization of net actuarial gain/loss and prior service cost included in net periodic benefit costs, net of income tax expense of $5, $3, and $3 million, respectively  8   6   8 
Available for sale securities:
               
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities  1       
Comprehensive income $430  $243  $196 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  
 2012 2011
   (in millions)
ASSETS
          
Current assets
          
Cash and cash equivalents $880  $851 
Short-term investments  48    
Merchandise inventories  1,167   1,069 
Other current assets  268   159 
    2,363   2,079 
Property and equipment, net  490   427 
Deferred taxes  257   284 
Goodwill  145   144 
Other intangible assets, net  40   54 
Other assets  72   62 
   $3,367  $3,050 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          
Current liabilities
          
Accounts payable $298  $240 
Accrued and other liabilities  338   308 
    636   548 
Long-term debt  133   135 
Other liabilities  221   257 
Total liabilities  990   940 
Shareholders’ equity  2,377   2,110 
   $3,367  $3,050 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

       
 Additional Paid-In
Capital &
Common Stock
 Treasury Stock Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
Shareholders’
Equity
   Shares Amount Shares Amount
   (shares in thousands, amounts in millions)
Balance at January 30, 2010  161,267  $709   (4,726)  $(103)  $1,535  $(193)  $1,948 
Restricted stock issued  205                       
Issued under director and stock plans  1,187   10                   10 
Share-based compensation expense     13                   13 
Total tax benefit from exercise of options     2                       2 
Forfeitures of restricted stock     1   (50               1 
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (292  (4            (4
Acquired in exchange of stock options        (34  (1            (1
Share repurchases        (3,215  (50            (50
Reissued under employee stock purchase plan        278   6             6 
Net income                      169        169 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.60 per share)                      (93       (93
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           11   11 
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           1   1 
Pension and post-retirement adjustments, net of tax                           12   12 
Balance at January 29, 2011  162,659  $735   (8,039)  $(152)  $1,611  $(169)  $2,025 
Restricted stock issued  242                       
Issued under director and stock plans  1,559   19                   19 
Share-based compensation expense     18                   18 
Total tax benefit from exercise of options     6                       6 
Forfeitures of restricted stock     1   (60               1 
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (140  (3            (3
Acquired in exchange of stock options        (34  (1            (1
Share repurchases        (4,904  (104            (104
Reissued under employee stock purchase plan        336   7             7 
Net income                      278        278 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.66 per share)                      (101       (101
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           (23  (23
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           (2  (2
Pension and post-retirement adjustments, net of tax                           (10  (10
Balance at January 28, 2012  164,460  $779   (12,841)  $(253)  $1,788  $(204)  $2,110 
Restricted stock issued  99                       
Issued under director and stock plans  2,350   46                   46 
Share-based compensation expense     20                   20 
Total tax benefit from exercise of options     11                       11 
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (214  (7            (7
Acquired in exchange of stock options        (2                
Share repurchases        (4,000  (129            (129
Reissued under employee stock purchase plan        218   5             5 
Net income                      397        397 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.72 per share)                      (109       (109
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           19   19 
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           4   4 
Pension and post-retirement adjustments, net of tax                           9   9 
Unrealized gain on available-for-securities, with no tax expense                           1   1 
Balance at February 2, 2013  166,909  $856   (16,839)  $(384)  $2,076  $(171)  $2,377 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
From Operating Activities
               
Net income $397  $278  $169 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Non-cash impairment charges  12   5   10 
Depreciation and amortization  118   110   106 
Share-based compensation expense  20   18   13 
Deferred tax provision  20   29   84 
Qualified pension plan contributions  (26  (28  (32
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation  9   5   1 
Change in assets and liabilities:               
Merchandise inventories  (91  (17  (19
Accounts payable  57   19   7 
Accrued and other liabilities  (4  38   35 
Income tax receivables and payables  (34  24   (33
Payment on the settlement of the net investment hedge        (24
Other, net  (62  16   9 
Net cash provided by operating activities  416   497   326 
From Investing Activities               
Gain from lease terminations     2   1 
Gain from insurance recoveries     1    
Purchases of short-term investments  (88      
Sales of short-term investments  39      9 
Capital expenditures  (163  (152  (97
Net cash used in investing activities  (212  (149  (87
From Financing Activities               
Reduction in long-term debt  (2      
Dividends paid on common stock  (109  (101  (93
Issuance of common stock  43   18   10 
Purchase of treasury shares  (129  (104  (50
Treasury stock reissued under employee stock plan  5   4   3 
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation  11   5   3 
Net cash used in financing activities  (181  (178  (127
Effect of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Cash and Cash Equivalents  6   (15  2 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents  29   155   114 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  851   696   582 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $880  $851  $696 
Cash Paid During the Year:               
Interest $11  $12  $12 
Income taxes $230  $143  $53 
   
  2015 2014 2013
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Cost of sales  4,907   4,777   4,372 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  1,415   1,426   1,334 
Depreciation and amortization  148   139   133 
Litigation, impairment and other charges  105   4   2 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
Other income  (4)   (9  (4
    6,575   6,342   5,842 
Income before income taxes  837   809   663 
Income tax expense  296   289   234 
Net income $541  $520  $429 
Basic earnings per share $3.89  $3.61  $2.89 
Weighted-average shares outstanding  139.1   143.9   148.4 
Diluted earnings per share $3.84  $3.56  $2.85 
Weighted-average shares outstanding, assuming dilution  140.8   146.0   150.5 

 
 
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Net income $541  $520  $429 
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax
               
Foreign currency translation adjustment:
               
Translation adjustment arising during the period, net of income tax  (44)   (132  (25
Cash flow hedges:
               
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of income tax  5   (1  (5
Pension and postretirement adjustments:
               
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost and foreign currency fluctuations arising during the year, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $(10), $(7) and $2 million, respectively  (16)   (8  6 
Amortization of net actuarial gain/loss and prior service cost included in net periodic benefit costs, net of income tax expense of $5, $4, and $5 million, respectively  8   8   9 
Comprehensive income $494  $387  $414 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  
  2015 2014
   ($ in millions)
ASSETS
          
Current assets
          
Cash and cash equivalents $1,021  $967 
Merchandise inventories  1,285   1,250 
Other current assets  300   239 
    2,606   2,456 
Property and equipment, net  661   620 
Deferred taxes  234   221 
Goodwill  156   157 
Other intangible assets, net  45   49 
Other assets  73   74 
   $3,775  $3,577 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          
Current liabilities
          
Accounts payable $279  $301 
Accrued and other liabilities  420   393 
Current portion of capital lease obligations  1   2 
    700   696 
Long-term debt and obligations under capital leases  129   132 
Other liabilities  393   253 
Total liabilities  1,222   1,081 
Shareholders’ equity  2,553   2,496 
   $3,775  $3,577 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

       
 Additional Paid-In
Capital &
Common Stock
 Treasury Stock Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Total
Shareholders’
Equity
   Shares Amount Shares Amount
   (shares in thousands, amounts in millions)
Balance at February 2, 2013  166,909  $856   (16,839)  $(384)  $2,076  $(171)  $2,377 
Restricted stock issued  665                       
Issued under director and stock plans  1,465   31                   31 
Share-based compensation expense     25                   25 
Excess tax benefits from equity awards     9                       9 
Forfeitures of restricted stock        (2                    
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (479  (16            (16
Acquired in exchange of stock options        (1                
Share repurchases        (6,424  (229            (229
Reissued – employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”)        133   3             3 
Net income                      429        429 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.80 per share)                      (118       (118
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           (25  (25
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           (5  (5
Pension and postretirement adjustments, net of tax                           15   15 
Balance at February 1, 2014  169,039  $921   (23,612)  $(626)  $2,387  $(186)  $2,496 
Restricted stock issued  578                       
Issued under director and stock plans  912   22                   22 
Share-based compensation expense     24                   24 
Excess tax benefits from equity awards     12                       12 
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (324  (16            (16
Share repurchases        (5,889  (305            (305
Reissued – ESPP        160   3             3 
Net income                      520        520 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.88 per share)                      (127       (127
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           (132  (132
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           (1  (1
Balance at January 31, 2015  170,529  $979   (29,665)  $(944)  $2,780  $(319)  $2,496 
Restricted stock issued  299                       
Issued under director and stock plans  2,570   70                   70 
Share-based compensation expense     22                   22 
Excess tax benefits from equity awards     35                       35 
Forfeitures of restricted stock     2   (45  (2             
Shares of common stock used to satisfy tax withholding obligations        (142  (9            (9
Share repurchases        (6,693  (419            (419
Reissued – ESPP        124   3             3 
Net income                      541        541 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($1.00 per share)                      (139       (139
Translation adjustment, net of tax                           (44  (44
Change in cash flow hedges, net of tax                           5   5 
Pension and postretirement adjustments, net of tax                           (8  (8
Balance at January 30, 2016  173,398  $1,108   (36,421)  $(1,371)  $3,182  $(366)  $2,553 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
From Operating Activities
               
Net income $541  $520  $429 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Non-cash impairment charges  5   4    
Depreciation and amortization  148   139   133 
Deferred income taxes  (6)   20   19 
Share-based compensation expense  22   24   25 
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation  (35)   (12  (8
Gain on sale of real estate     (4   
Qualified pension plan contributions  (4)   (6  (2
Change in assets and liabilities:
               
Merchandise inventories  (49)   (81  (20
Accounts payable  (17)   51   (48
Accrued and other liabilities     33   (10
Pension litigation accrual  100       
Other, net  40   24   12 
Net cash provided by operating activities  745   712   530 
From Investing Activities
               
Capital expenditures  (228)   (190  (206
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired  (2)      (81
Proceeds from sale of real estate     5    
Sales and maturities of short-term investments     9   60 
Purchases of short-term investments        (23
Gain from lease terminations        2 
Net cash used in investing activities  (230)   (176  (248
From Financing Activities
               
Purchase of treasury shares  (419)   (305  (229
Dividends paid on common stock  (139)   (127  (118
Issuance of common stock  64   17   27 
Treasury stock reissued under employee stock plan  5   5   3 
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation  35   12   9 
Reduction in long-term debt and obligations under capital leases  (2)   (3  (1
Net cash used in financing activities  (456)   (401  (309
Effect of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on Cash and Cash Equivalents  (5)   (26  5 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents  54   109   (22
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year  967   858   880 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $1,021  $967  $858 
Cash Paid During the Year:
               
Interest $11  $11  $11 
Income taxes $283  $251  $175 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Foot Locker, Inc. and its domestic and international subsidiaries (the “Company”), all of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.

Reporting Year

The 2012 fiscal year end for the Company is the Saturday closest to the last day in January. Fiscal year 2012 represents the 53 weeks ending February 2, 2013. Fiscal years 20112015, 2014, and 2010 represent2013 represented the 52 week periods endingweeks ended January 28, 2012,30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and January 29, 2011,February 1, 2014, respectively. References to years in this annual report relate to fiscal years rather than calendar years.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from retail stores is recognized at the point of sale when the product is delivered to customers. Internet and catalog sales revenue is recognized upon estimated receipt by the customer. Sales include shipping and handling fees for all periods presented. Sales include merchandise, net of returns, and exclude taxes. The Company provides for estimated returns based on return history and sales levels. Revenue from layaway sales is recognized when the customer receives the product, rather than when the initial deposit is paid.

Gift Cards

The Company sells gift cards to its customers, which do not have expiration dates. Revenue from gift card sales is recorded when the gift cards are redeemed or when the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote and there is no legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions, referred to as breakage. The Company has determined its gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns. Historical experience indicates that after 12 months, the likelihood of redemption is deemed to be remote. Gift card breakage income is included in selling, general and administrative expenses and totaled $3 million, $4 million, and $2 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. Unredeemedunredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current liability. Gift card breakage was $5 million for 2015 and 2014, and $4 million for 2013.

Store Pre-Opening and Closing Costs

Store pre-opening costs are charged to expense as incurred. In the event a store is closed before its lease has expired, the estimated post-closing lease exit costs, less theany sublease rental income, is provided for once the store ceases to be used.

Advertising Costs and Sales Promotion

Advertising and sales promotion costs are expensed at the time the advertising or promotion takes place, net of reimbursements for cooperative advertising. Advertising expenses also include advertising costs as required by some of the Company’s mall-based leases. Cooperative advertising reimbursements earned for the launch and promotion of certain products agreed upon with vendors isare recorded in the same period as the associated expenses are incurred.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Reimbursement received in excess of expenses incurred related to specific, incremental, and identifiable advertising costs, is accounted for as a reduction to the cost of merchandise, which is reflected in cost of sales as the merchandise is sold.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Advertising costs, which are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, were as follows:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Advertising expenses $132  $121  $97  $119  $125  $124 
Cooperative advertising reimbursements  (25  (22  (23  (19)   (21  (22
Net advertising expense $107  $99  $74  $100  $104  $102 

Catalog Costs

Catalog costs, which are primarily comprisecomprised of paper, printing, and postage, are capitalized and amortized over the expected customer response period related to each catalog, which is generally 90 days. Cooperative reimbursements earned for the promotion of certain products are agreed upon with vendors and are recorded in the same period as the associated catalog expenses are amortized. Prepaid catalog costs totaled $4were $2 million and $3 million at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, respectively.

Catalog costs, which are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, were as follows:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Catalog costs $  45  $  44  $  45  $28  $32  $36 
Cooperative reimbursements  (6  (5  (5  (7)   (7  (5
Net catalog expense $39  $39  $40  $21  $25  $31 

Earnings Per Share

The Company accounts for and discloses earnings per share using the treasury stock method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing reported net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding at the end of the period. Restricted stock awards, which contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, are considered participating securities and are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share reflects the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period used in the basic earnings per share computation plus dilutive common stock equivalents.

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions, except per share data) (in millions, except per share data)
Net income $397  $278  $169 
Net Income $541  $520  $429 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  151.2   153.0   155.7   139.1   143.9   148.4 
Basic Earnings per share $2.62  $1.81  $1.08 
Basic earnings per share $3.89  $3.61  $2.89 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  151.2   153.0   155.7   139.1   143.9   148.4 
Dilutive effect of potential common shares  2.8   1.4   1.0   1.7   2.1   2.1 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution
  154.0   154.4   156.7   140.8   146.0   150.5 
Diluted earnings per share $2.58  $1.80  $1.07  $3.84  $3.56  $2.85 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Potential common shares include the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units. Options to purchase 0.8 million, 3.8 million, and 4.50.6 million shares of common stock for both January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, and 1.0 million shares at February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 2011, respectively,1, 2014, were not included in the computations primarily because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect of their inclusion would be antidilutive. Contingently issuable shares of 0.10.2 million, 0.3 million, and 0.2 million at January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 1, 2014, respectively, have not been included as the vesting conditions have not been satisfied.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes compensation expense in the financial statements for share-based awards based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Additionally, stock-based compensation expense includes an estimate for pre-vesting forfeitures and expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periodsperiod for each vesting tranche of the awards.award. See Note 21,22,Share-Based Compensation, for information on the assumptions the Company used to calculate the fair value of share-based compensation.

Upon exercise of stock options, issuance of restricted stock or units, or issuance of shares under the employees stock purchase plan, the Company will issue authorized but unissued common stock or use common stock held in treasury. The Company may make repurchases of its common stock from time to time, subject to legal and contractual restrictions, market conditions, and other factors.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 201231, 2015 were $841$983 million and $830$930 million, respectively. Included in theseCash equivalents include amounts are $187 millionon demand with banks and $191 million of short-term deposits as of February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, including commercial paper and money market funds, to be cash equivalents.funds. Additionally, amounts due from third-party credit card processors for the settlement of debit and credit card transactions are included as cash equivalents as they are generally collected within three business days.

Investments

Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and are not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations until a sale transaction occurs or when declines in fair value are deemed to be other-than-temporary. The Company routinely reviews available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value below the cost basis, and when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of a security may not be recoverable, the security is written down to fair value. As of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, the Company held $54$6 million of available-for-sale securities, which was comprised of $48 million in short-term investments and a $6 millionrepresented the Company’s auction rate security. See Note 1920, Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion of these investments.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Merchandise Inventories and Cost of Sales

Merchandise inventories for the Company’s Athletic Stores are valued at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Cost for retail stores is determined on the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) basis for domestic inventories and on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis for international inventories. Merchandise inventories of the Direct-to-Customers business are valued at the lower of cost or market using weighted-average cost, which approximates FIFO.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

The retail inventory method is commonly used by retail companies to value inventories at cost and calculate gross margins due to its practicality. Under the retail inventory method, cost is determined by applying a cost-to-retail percentage across groupings of similar items, known as departments. The cost-to-retail percentage is applied to ending inventory at its current owned retail valuation to determine the cost of ending inventory on a department basis. The Company provides reserves based on current selling prices when the inventory has not been marked down to market. Merchandise inventories of the Direct-to-Customers business are valued at the lower of cost or market using weighted-average cost, which approximates FIFO. Transportation, distribution center, and sourcing costs are capitalized in merchandise inventories. The Company expenses the freight associated with transfers between its store locations in the period incurred. The Company maintains an accrual for shrinkage based on historical rates.

Cost of sales is comprised of the cost of merchandise, as well as occupancy, buyers’ compensation, and shipping and handling costs. The cost of merchandise is recorded net of amounts received from vendorssuppliers for damaged product returns, markdown allowances, and volume rebates, as well as cooperative advertising reimbursements received in excess of specific, incremental advertising expenses. Occupancy includescosts include the amortization of amounts received from landlords for tenant improvements.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Significant additions and improvements to property and equipment are capitalized. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:

 
Buildings Maximum of 50 years
Leasehold improvements 10 years or term of lease, if shorter
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 3 – 10 years
Software 2 – 7 years

Maintenance and repairs are charged to current operations as incurred. Major renewals or replacements that substantially extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized and depreciated.

Internal-Use Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes certain external and internal computer software and software development costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage generally includes software design and configuration, coding, testing, and installation activities. Capitalized costs include only external direct cost of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software, and payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and devote time to the internal-use software project. Capitalization of such costs ceases no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Training and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. Capitalized software, net of accumulated amortization, is included as a component of property and equipment and was $29$46 million and $27$39 million at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Recoverability of Long-Lived Tangible Assets

The Company recognizesperforms an impairment losses whenever events or changes inreview when circumstances indicate that the carrying amountsvalue of long-lived tangible and intangible assets with finite lives may not be recoverable. Management’s policy in determining whether an impairment indicator exists, a triggering event, comprises measurable operating performance criteria at the division level, as well as qualitative measures. The Company considers historical performance and future estimated results, which are predominately identified from the Company’s strategic long-range plans, in its evaluation of potential store-level impairment and then compares the carrying amount of the asset with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows, the Company measures the amount of the impairment by comparing the carrying amount of the asset with its estimated fair value. The estimation of fair value is measured by


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

discounting expected future cash flows at the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital. The Company estimates fair value based on the best information available using estimates, judgments, and projections as considered necessary.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company reviews goodwillGoodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment annually during the first quarter of itseach fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

The review of goodwill impairment consists of either using a qualitative approach to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the assets is less than their respective carrying values or a two-step impairment test, if necessary. If, based on the results of the qualitative assessment, it is concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is greater than its carrying value, the two-step test is performed to identify potential impairment. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, it is unnecessary to perform the two-step impairment test.

Based on certain circumstances, we may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the first step of the two-step impairment test. The first step of the two-step goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The second step includes hypothetically valuing all the tangible and intangible assets of the reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. Then, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount of the excess. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined using a combination of market and discounted cash flow approaches.

Intangible assets that are determined to have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives and are measured for impairment only when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. The impairment review for intangible assets with indefinite lives consists of either performing a qualitative or a quantitative assessment. If the results of the qualitative assessment indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible is less than its carrying amount, or if we elect to proceed directly to a quantitative assessment, we calculate the fair value using a discounted cash flow method, based on the relief from royalty concept, and compare the fair value to the carrying value to determine if the asset is impaired.

Derivative Financial Instruments

All derivative financial instruments are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. For derivatives designated as a hedge, and effective as part of a hedge transaction, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income/loss or as a basis adjustment to the underlying hedged item and reclassified to earnings in the period in which the hedged item affects earnings. The effective portion of the gain or loss on hedges of foreign net investments is generally not reclassified to earnings unless the net investment is disposed of.

To the extent derivatives do not qualify or are not designated as hedges, or are ineffective, their changes in fair value are recorded in earnings immediately, which may subject the Company to increased earnings volatility.

Fair Value

The Company categorizes its financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. Fair value is determined based upon the exit price that would be received to


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants exclusive of any transaction costs.

The Company’s financial assets recorded at fair value are categorized as follows:

Level 1  Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2  Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in active markets.

Level 3  Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value-drivers are unobservable.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for its income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Deferred tax assets are recognized for tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards, reduced by a valuation allowance, which is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company recognizes net deferred tax assets to the extent that it believes these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If the Company determines that it would be able to realize theirits deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

A taxing authority may challenge positions that the Company adopted in its income tax filings. Accordingly, the Company may apply different tax treatments for transactions in filing its income tax returns than for income tax financial reporting. The Company regularly assesses its tax positions for such transactions and records reserves for those differences when considered necessary. Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the positions will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon settlement. Whether the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is met for a tax position is a matter of judgment based on the individual facts and circumstances of that position evaluated in light of all available evidence. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statementConsolidated Statement of operations.Operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability line in the consolidated balance sheet.Consolidated Balance Sheet. Provision for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries is made only on those amounts in excess of the funds considered to be permanently reinvested.

Pension and Postretirement Obligations

The discount rate for the U.S. plans is determined by reference to the Bond:Link interest rate model based upon a portfolio of highly rated U.S. corporate bonds with individual bonds that are theoretically purchased to settle the plan’s anticipated cash outflows. The cash flows are discounted to their present value and an overall discount rate is determined. The discount rate selected to measure the present value of the Company’s


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Canadian benefit obligations was developed by using the plan’s bond portfolio indices, which match the benefit obligations. The Company measures its plan assets and benefit obligations using the month-end date that is closest to our fiscal year end.

Insurance Liabilities

The Company is primarily self-insured for health care, workers’ compensation, and general liability costs. Accordingly, provisions are made for the Company’s actuarially determined estimates of discounted future claim costs for such risks, for the aggregate of claims reported and claims incurred but not yet reported. Self-insured liabilities totaled $14$13 million at both February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012.31, 2015. The Company discounts its workers’ compensation and general liability reserves using a risk-free interest rate. Imputed interest expense related to these liabilities was not significant for 2012, 2011, and 2010.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summaryany of Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

the periods presented.

Accounting for Leases

The Company recognizes rent expense for operating leases as of the possession date for store leases or the commencement of the agreement for a non-store lease. Rental expense, inclusive of rent holidays, concessions, and tenant allowances are recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis. Contingent payments based upon sales and future increases determined by inflation related indices cannot be estimated at the inception of the lease and accordingly, are charged to operations as incurred.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company’s international operations is the applicable local currency. The translation of the applicable foreign currency into U.S. dollars is performed for balance sheet accounts using current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using the weighted-average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The unearned gains and losses resulting from such translation are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss within shareholders’ equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

During 2012,In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-17,Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.This amendment changes how deferred taxes are recognized by eliminating the requirement of presenting deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent on the balance sheet. Instead, the requirement will be to classify all deferred tax liabilities and assets as noncurrent. ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period, with earlier adoption permitted. ASU 2015-17 can be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company adoptedplans on early adopting ASU No. 2011-08,Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The revised standard is intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary.2015-17 prospectively during fiscal year 2016. The adoption of this ASU didguidance is not expected to have a significantan effect on our results of operations or financial position.cash flows, as this represents only a change in balance sheet classification.

Also during 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income,which requires presentation of total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The implementation of the amended reporting guidance had no effect on our disclosures.

Additionally in 2012,In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02,2016-02,Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for ImpairmentLeases, which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset, other than goodwill, is impaired. If an entity concludes, based on an evaluation of all relevant qualitative factors, that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying amount, it will not be required to perform a quantitative impairment test for that asset. Entities are required to test indefinite-lived assets for impairment at least annually, and more frequently if indicators of impairment exist.. This ASU wasrevises the existing guidance related to leases by requiring lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases. This ASU also requires additional disclosure regarding leasing arrangements. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the Company on February 3, 2013. Theimpact of the adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on our resultsits consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  Summary of operations or financial position.

Significant Accounting Policies  – (continued)

Other recently issued accounting pronouncements did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material effect on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  Acquisitions

On August 3, 2015, the Company completed an insignificant asset acquisition from Futura Sport AG for total consideration of $2 million. The assets acquired include store fixtures, lease agreements, and inventory for 10 Runners Point and Sidestep franchise stores in Switzerland. The purchase price allocation has been completed as of January 30, 2016.

3.  Segment Information

The Company has determined that its reportable segments are those that are based on its method of internal reporting. As of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, the Company has two reportable segments, Athletic Stores and Direct-to-Customers. The accounting policies of both segments are the same as those described in theSummary of Significant Accounting Policiesnote. The Company evaluates performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is division results. Division profit reflects income before income taxes, pension litigation charge, corporate expense, non-operating income, and net interest expense.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Sales                              
Athletic Stores $5,568  $5,110  $4,617  $6,468  $6,286  $5,790 
Direct-to-Customers  614   513   432   944   865   715 
Total sales $6,182  $5,623  $5,049  $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 
Operating Results                              
Athletic Stores(1) $653  $495  $329  $872  $777  $656 
Direct-to-Customers(2)  65   45   30   142   109   84 
  718   540   359 
Restructuring charge(3)     (1   
Division profit  718   539   359   1,014   886   740 
Less: Corporate expense  108   102   97 
Less: Pension litigation charge  100       
Less: Corporate expense(3)  77   81   76 
Operating profit  610   437   262   837   805   664 
Interest expense, net  4   5   5 
Other income  2   4   4   4   9   4 
Interest expense, net  5   6   9 
Income before income taxes $607  $435  $257  $837  $809  $663 

(1)Included in the results for 2015, 2014, and 2013 are impairment and other charges of $4 million, $2 million, and $2 million, respectively. The results 2012 include a non-cash impairment charge of $5 million2015 amount reflects charges to write downwrite-down long-lived store assets of Runners Point. The 2014 amount reflected impairment charges to fully write-down the value of certain trade names. The 2013 amounts were incurred in connection with the closure of CCS stores as a result of the Company’s decision to close the stores during the first quarter of 2013.stores. See Note 4,Litigation, Impairment and Other Charges for additional information.
(2)Included in the results for 2012, 2011, and 2010 are2015 is a $1 million non-cash impairment charge relating to an ecommerce trade name. The 2014 amount reflected non-cash impairment charges of $7$2 million $5 million, and $10 million, respectively, related to the CCS business.trade name. See Note 3,4,Litigation, Impairment and Other Charges for additional information.
(3)In 2011,Corporate expense for all years presented reflects the Companyreallocation of expense between corporate and the operating divisions. Based upon annual internal studies of corporate expense, the allocation of such expenses to the operating divisions was increased its 1993 Repositioning and 1991 Restructuring reserve by $1$5 million for repairs necessary to one of the locations comprising this reserve. This amount is included in selling, general2015, $4 million for 2014, and administrative expenses.$27 million for 2013 thereby reducing corporate expense.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

3.  Segment Information  – (continued)

                  
 Depreciation and Amortization Capital Expenditures Total Assets Depreciation
and Amortization
 Capital Expenditures(1) Total Assets
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Athletic Stores $96  $90  $85  $128  $117  $72  $2,310  $2,065  $1,993  $130  $119  $112  $181  $151  $163  $2,612  $2,499  $2,398 
Direct-to-Customers  9   9   9   5   6   4   290   284   280   7   7   9   7   9   5   330   315   320 
  105   99   94   133   123   76   2,600   2,349   2,273   137   126   121   188   160   168   2,942   2,814   2,718 
Corporate  13   11   12   30   29   21   767   701   623   11   13   12   40   30   38   833   763   769 
Total Company $118  $110  $106  $163  $152  $97  $3,367  $3,050  $2,896  $148  $139  $133  $228  $190  $206  $3,775  $3,577  $3,487 

(1)Reflects cash capital expenditures for all years presented.

Sales and long-lived asset information by geographic area as of and for the fiscal years ended January 30, 2016, January 31, 2015, and February 2, 2013, January 28, 2012, and January 29, 20111, 2014 are presented in the following tables. Sales are attributed to the country in which the sales originate, whichtransaction is where the legal subsidiary is domiciled.fulfilled. Long-lived assets reflect property and equipment.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Sales                              
United States $4,495  $3,959  $3,568  $5,305  $4,976  $4,567 
International  1,687   1,664   1,481   2,107   2,175   1,938 
Total sales $6,182  $5,623  $5,049  $7,412  $7,151  $6,505 

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Long-Lived Assets               
United States $486  $446  $394 
International  175   174   196 
Total long-lived assets $661  $620  $590 

For the year ended January 30, 2016, the countries that comprised the majority of the sales and long-lived assets for the international category were Germany, Italy, Canada, and France. No other individual country included in the international category is significant.

4.  Litigation, Impairment and Other Charges

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Pension litigation charge $100  $ —  $ — 
Impairment of long-lived assets  4       
Other intangible asset impairments  1   4    
CCS store closure costs        2 
Total litigation, impairment and other charges $105  $4  $2 

During the third quarter of 2015, the Company recorded a $100 million pension litigation charge. Please see Note 23,Legal Proceedings for further information.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2.  Segment Information4.  Litigation, Impairment and Other Charges  – (continued)

The Company’s sales in Italy, Canada,During 2015, the Company evaluated the long-lived assets of Runners Point and France represent approximately 22, 19, and 15 percent, respectively, of the International category’s sales for the period ended February 2, 2013. No other individual country included in the International category is significant.

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Long-Lived Assets               
United States $321  $285  $257 
International  169   142   129 
Total long-lived assets $490  $427  $386 

3.  Impairment Charges

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Impairment of intangible assets $  7  $  5  $  10 
Impairment of long-lived assets  5       
Total impairment charges $12  $5  $10 

Impairment of Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that are determined to have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives and are measuredSidestep for impairment only when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are testedand recorded a non-cash charge of $4 million to write-down store fixtures and leasehold improvements for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. We estimate the fair value based on an income approach using the relief-from-royalty method. During the fourth quarters of each of the years presented, the Company determined that triggering events had occurred related to its CCS intangible assets, which is part of the Direct-to-Customers segment, reflecting decreases in projected revenues. The 2012 charge also reflected a decrease in the assumed royalty rate as61 stores. As a result of lower profitability.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

During 2012,the impairment review related to long-lived assets, the Company performed a review of other intangible assets and recorded a non-cash impairment charges totaling $5charge of $1 million, to write-down long-lived assets at its CCS division. This impairment chargewhich was recorded to fully impairwrite down the value of an ecommerce trade name reflecting a decline in sales as the Company has shifted away from the use of this website.

In connection with the Company’s former CCS ecommerce business, the Company recorded charges of $2 million in each of 2014 and 2013. The 2014 charge represented impairment of the CCS stores net booktrade name to its fair value, as a result of the Company’s decision to close these locationswhich was realized upon sale during 2013. Some of the locations will be converted to other formats. Additional2014. The 2013 charge represented costs associated with this shutdown are not expected to be significant. Nothe closure of CCS stores. Also during 2014, the Company recorded additional intangible asset impairment charges totaling $2 million related to long-lived assets were recorded during 2011 or 2010.the full write down of the trade name related to stores in the Republic of Ireland and a full write down of the value of a private-label brand acquired as part of the Runners Point Group acquisition, to reflect the exit of this product line.

4.5.  Other Income

Other income includes non-operating items, such as: gains from insurance recoveries; discounts/premiums paid on the repurchase and retirement of bonds; royalty income; and the changes in fair value, premiums paid, and realized gains associated with foreign currency option contracts.contracts and property sales. Other income was $2$4 million in 20122015, $9 million in 2014, and $4 million in both 2011 and 2010.2013.

For 2012,2015, other income primarily includes a $2 million insurance recovery related to a business interruption claim and $2 million of royalty income. For 2011, other2014, it included a $4 million gain on a sale of property, $2 million of royalty income, primarily includes $2 million of realized gain associated with foreign currency option contracts, and $1 million of lease termination gains related to the sales of leasehold interests, $1 million for insurance recoveries, as well as royalty income. For 2010, otherinterests. Other income includes ain 2013 represented $2 million gain on its money-market investment, as well asof royalty income and gains on lease terminations$2 million related to certain lease interests in Europe.termination gains.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5.6.  Merchandise Inventories

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
LIFO inventories $752  $688  $847  $821 
FIFO inventories  415   381   438   429 
Total merchandise inventories $1,167  $1,069  $1,285  $1,250 

The value of the Company’s LIFO inventories, as calculated on a LIFO basis, approximates their value as calculated on a FIFO basis.

6.7.  Other Current Assets

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Net receivables $94  $78 
Prepaid rent  81   77 
Prepaid income taxes $72  $36   66   34 
Prepaid rent  70   27 
Net receivables  68   49 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  38   33   33   32 
Deferred taxes and costs  14   13   22   17 
Fair value of derivative contracts  6      3    
Income tax receivable     1   1   1 
 $268  $159  $300  $239 

7.  Property and Equipment, Net

  
 2012 2011
   (in millions)
Land $6  $3 
Buildings:          
Owned  41   31 
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software development costs:          
Owned  832   799 
    879   833 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (622  (615
    257   218 
Alterations to leased and owned buildings          
Cost  772   729 
Less: accumulated amortization  (539  (520
    233   209 
   $490  $427 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

8.  Property and Equipment, Net

  
  2015 2014
   ($ in millions)
Land $4  $4 
Buildings:
          
Owned  43   44 
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software development costs:
          
Owned  954   900 
Assets under capital leases  8   9 
    1,009   957 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (640)   (606
    369   351 
Alterations to leased and owned buildings
          
Cost  804   779 
Less: accumulated amortization  (512)   (510
    292   269 
   $661  $620 

9.  Goodwill

The Athletic Stores segment’s goodwill is net of accumulated impairment charges of $167 million for all periods presented. The 20122015 and 20112014 annual goodwill impairment tests did not result in an impairment charge as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded the carrying values of each respective reporting unit.charge.

   
 Athletic
Stores
 Direct-to-
Customers
 Total
   (in millions)
Goodwill at January 29, 2011 $  18  $127  $145 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (1     (1
Goodwill at January 28, 2012 $17  $127  $144 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  1      1 
Goodwill at February 2, 2013 $18  $127  $145 
   
  Athletic
Stores
 Direct-to-
Customers
 Total
   ($ in millions)
Goodwill at February 1, 2014 $21  $142  $163 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (4  (2  (6
Goodwill at January 31, 2015 $17  $140  $157 
Foreign currency translation adjustment     (1  (1
Goodwill at January 30, 2016 $17  $139  $156 

9.10.  Other Intangible Assets, net

       
 February 2, 2013 Wtd. Avg.
Life in
Years
 January 28, 2012
(in millions) Gross
value
 Accum.
amort.
 Net
Value
 Gross
value
 Accum.
amort.
 Net
Value
Amortized intangible assets:(1),(2)                                   
Lease acquisition costs $158  $(137 $  21   12.4  $171  $(149 $  22 
Trademarks  21   (9  12   19.7   21   (8  13 
Favorable leases  5   (5     10.1   7   (7   
CCS customer relationships  21   (18  3   5.0   21   (13  8 
   $205  $(169 $36   12.4  $220  $(177 $43 
Indefinite life intangible assets:          
Republic of Ireland trademark (1)            1                  1 
CCS tradename (3)        3            10 
         $4           $11 
Other intangible assets, net       $40           $54 
       
 January 30, 2016 Wtd. Avg.
Life in
Years(2)
 January 31, 2015
($ in millions) Gross
value
 Accum.
amort.
 Net
Value
 Gross
value
 Accum.
amort.
 Net
Value
Amortized intangible assets:(1)
                                   
Lease acquisition costs $119  $(107)  $12   10.0  $128  $(116 $12 
Trademarks/trade names  20   (12)   8   20.0   21   (12  9 
Favorable leases  7   (5)   2   7.8   7   (4  3 
  $146  $(124)  $22   13.8  $156  $(132 $24 
Indefinite life intangible assets:(1)
                                   
Runners Point Group trademarks/trade names(3)            23                  25 
             $23                 $25 
Other intangible assets, net           $45                 $49 

(1)IncludesThe movements in the ending balances also reflect the effect of foreign currency translation relatedfluctuations due primarily to the movements of the euro in relation to the U.S. dollar. Additionally, the amounts presented for each of the periods reflects accumulated impairment charges of $2 million.
(2)The weighted-average useful life disclosedis as of January 30, 2016 and excludes those assets that are fully amortized.
(3)The net value of the CCS tradename at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 includesIncludes non-cash impairment charges of $7$1 million recorded in both 2015 and $5 million, respectively, as2014. These impairment charges are described more fully in Note 3,4, Litigation, Impairment and Other Charges. The accumulated impairment charge related to the CCS tradename is $22 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.  Other Intangible Assets, net  – (continued)

Amortizing intangible assets primarily represent lease acquisition costs, which are amounts that are required to secure prime lease locations and other lease rights, primarily in Europe. During 2012,Amortizing intangible assets decreased by $2 million in 2015, which reflects additions of $7$3 million were recorded primarily fromrelated to new leases in Europe.Europe and the United States, partially offset by $1 million in foreign currency fluctuations. Amortization expense for intangibles subject to amortization was $14$4 million, $16$6 million, and $17$11 million for 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively.

Estimated future amortization expense for finite lived intangibles for the next five years is as follows:

 
 (in millions)
2013 $  11 
2014  5 
2015  4 
2016  3 
2017  3 
 
  ($ in millions)
2016 $4 
2017  3 
2018  3 
2019  3 
2020  3 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

10.11.  Other Assets

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Funds deposited in insurance trust(1) $  9  $  9 
Restricted cash(1) $22  $22 
Deferred tax costs  12   5 
Pension asset  7   8   8   13 
Auction rate security  6   5   6   6 
Deferred tax costs  5   1 
Income tax receivables  3    
Income tax asset  2   1 
Prepaid income taxes     4 
Funds deposited in insurance trust(2)  4   4 
Other  40   34   21   24 
 $72  $62  $73  $74 

(1)Restricted cash is comprised of amounts held in escrow in connection with various leasing arrangements in Europe.
(2)The Company is required by its insurers to collateralize part of the self-insured workers’ compensation and liability claims. The Company has chosen to satisfy these collateral requirements by depositing funds in an insurance trust.trusts.

11.12.  Accrued and Other Liabilities

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Current deferred tax liabilities $62  $48 
Taxes other than income taxes  56   56 
Other payroll and payroll related costs, excluding taxes $60  $61   54   54 
Customer deposits(1)  46   44 
Incentive bonuses  48   55   46   51 
Taxes other than income taxes  45   45 
Customer deposits(1)  34   30 
Income taxes payable  39   10 
Property and equipment(2)  33   22   27   49 
Current deferred tax liabilities  31   24 
Pension and postretirement benefits  4   4 
Sales return reserve  4   4 
Income taxes payable  3   3 
Fair value of derivatives     2 
Other  76   58   90   81 
 $338  $308  $420  $393 

(1)Customer deposits include unredeemed gift cards and certificates, merchandise credits, and deferred revenue related to undelivered merchandise, including layaway sales.
(2)Accruals for property and equipment are properly excluded from the statements of cash flows for all years presented.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.13.  Revolving Credit Facility

On January 27, 2012, the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “2011 Restated Credit Agreement”) with its banks. The 2011 Restated Credit Agreement provides for a $200 million asset based revolving credit facility maturing on January 27, 2017. In addition, during the term of the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement, the Company may make up to four requests for additional credit commitments in an aggregate amount not to exceed $200 million. Interest is based on the LIBOR rate in effect at the time of the borrowing plus a 1.25 to 1.50 percent margin depending on certain provisions as defined in the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

12.  Revolving Credit Facility  – (continued)

The 2011 Restated Credit Agreement provides for a security interest in certain of the Company’s domestic assets, including certain inventory assets, but excluding intellectual property. The Company is not required to comply with any financial covenants as long as there are no outstanding borrowings. With regard to the payment of dividends and share repurchases, there are no restrictions if the Company is not borrowing and the payments are funded through cash on hand. If the Company is borrowing, Availability as of the end of each fiscal month during the subsequent projected six fiscal months following the payment must be at least 20 percent of the lesser of the Aggregate Commitments and the Borrowing Base (all terms as defined in the 2011 Restated Credit Agreement).

The Company’s management does not currently expect to borrow underCompany uses the credit facility in 2013, other than amounts used to support standby letters of credit.

At February 2, 2013, the Company had unused domestic lines of credit of $199 million, while $1 million was committed to support standby letters of credit.in connection with insurance programs. The letters of credit are primarily used for insurance programs.

outstanding as of January 30, 2016 were not significant. Deferred financing fees are amortized over the life of the facility on a straight-line basis, which is comparable to the interest method. The unamortized balance at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 is $3$1 million.

The quarterly facility fees paid on the unused portion was 0.25 percent for both 2015 and 0.75 percent for 2012 and 2011, respectively.2014. There were no short-term borrowings during 20122015 or 2011.2014. Interest expense, including facility fees, related to the revolving credit facility was $1 million for 2012all years presented.

14.  Long-Term Debt and $4 million for both 2011 and 2010.

13.  Long-Term DebtObligations Under Capital Leases

The Company’s long-term debt reflects the Company’s 8.50 percent debentures payable in 2022, and was $133 million and $135 million for the years ended February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012, respectively. Excluding the unamortized gain of the interest rate swaps of $15 million, the principal outstanding is $118 million. The gain is being amortized as part of interest expense over the remaining term of the debt, using the effective-yield method.

  
  2015 2014
   ($ in millions)
8.5% debentures payable 2022 $118  $118 
Unamortized gain related to interest rate swaps(1)  11   12 
Obligations under capital leases  1   4 
   $130  $134 
Less: current portion of obligations under capital leases  1   2 
   $129  $132 
(1)In 2009, the Company terminated an interest rate swap at a gain. This gain is being amortized as part of interest expense over the remaining term of the debt using the effective-yield method.

Interest expense related to long-term debt including the effect of the interest rate swaps and the amortization of the associated debt issuance costs was $9 million for all years presented.

14.  Other Liabilities

Maturities of long-term debt and minimum rent payments under capital leases in future periods are:

  
 2012 2011
   (in millions)
Straight-line rent liability $  109  $  103 
Pension benefits  37   70 
Income taxes  21   31 
Postretirement benefits  14   14 
Workers’ compensation and general liability reserves  10   11 
Deferred taxes  5   5 
Other  25   23 
   $221  $257 
   
  Long-Term
Debt
 Capital
Leases
 Total
   ($ in millions)
2016 $  $1  $1 
2017 – 2020         
Thereafter  118      118 
   $118  $1  $119 
Less: Imputed interest         
 Current portion     1   1 
   $118  $ —  $118 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

15.  Other Liabilities

  
  2015 2014
   ($ in millions)
Straight-line rent liability $155  $124 
Pension litigation liability  100    
Pension benefits  69   46 
Income taxes  22   24 
Postretirement benefits  13   18 
Deferred taxes  13   14 
Workers’ compensation and general liability reserves  8   9 
Other  13   18 
   $393  $253 

16.  Leases

The Company is obligated under operating leases for almost all of its store properties. Some of the store leases contain renewal options with varying terms and conditions. Management expects that in the normal course of business, expiring leases will generally be renewed or, upon making a decision to relocate, replaced by leases on other premises. Operating lease periods generally range from 5 to 10 years.

Certain leases provide for additional rent payments based on a percentage of store sales. MostAlso, most of the Company’s leases require the payment of certain executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and other costs in addition to the future minimum lease payments. These costs, including the amortization of lease rights, totaled $137 million in 2015, $132 million in 2014, and $128 million $130 million, and $131 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. 2013.

Included in the amounts below, are non-store expenses that totaled $18 million in 2015, $17 million in 2014, and $16 million $17 million, and $15 million in 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.2013.

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Minimum rent $537  $525  $507  $618  $615  $580 
Contingent rent based on sales  24   20   16   27   25   22 
Sublease income  (1  (1  (1  (5)   (5  (2
 $560  $544  $522  $640  $635  $600 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating leases, net of future non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating sublease payments, are:

  
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
2013 $513 
2014  465 
2015  415 
2016  353  $574 
2017  287   542 
2018  490 
2019  445 
2020  406 
Thereafter  880   1,648 
Total operating lease commitments $2,913  $4,105 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

16.17.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, is comprised of the following:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Foreign currency translation adjustments $82  $63  $86  $(119)  $(75 $57 
Cash flow hedges  3   (1  1   2   (3  (2
Unrecognized pension cost and postretirement benefit  (255  (264  (254  (248)   (240  (240
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale security  (1  (2  (2  (1)   (1  (1
 $(171 $(204 $(169 $(366)  $(319 $(186

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the period ended January 30, 2016 were as follows:

     
($ in millions) Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 Cash Flow
Hedges
 Items Related
to Pension and
Postretirement Benefits
 Unrealized
Loss on
Available-For-
Sale Security
 Total
Balance as of January 31, 2015 $(75 $(3 $(240 $(1 $(319
OCI before reclassification  (44  5   (16     (55
Reclassified from AOCI        8      8 
Other comprehensive income/(loss)  (44  5   (8     (47
Balance as of January 30, 2016 $(119 $2  $(248 $(1 $(366

Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss for the period ended January 30, 2016 were as follows:

 
  ($ in millions)
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss:
     
Pension benefits – amortization of actuarial loss $14 
Postretirement benefits – amortization of actuarial gain  (1) 
Net periodic benefit cost (see Note 21)  13 
Income tax benefit  5 
Net of tax $8 

18.  Income Taxes

The domestic and international components of pre-tax income are as follows:

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Domestic $668  $654  $558 
International  169   155   105 
Total pre-tax income $837  $809  $663 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17.18.  Income Taxes  – (continued)

Following are the domestic and international components of pre-tax income:

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Domestic $508  $321  $158 
International  99   114   99 
Total pre-tax income $607  $435  $257 

The income tax provision consists of the following:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Current:                                   
Federal $152  $93  $(28 $212  $195  $164 
State and local  22   11   4   37   34   26 
International  16   24   28   53   40   25 
Total current tax provision  190   128   4   302   269   215 
Deferred:                              
Federal  13   16   79   (8)   16   13 
State and local  5   6   4   (1)   3   5 
International  2   7   1   3   1   1 
Total deferred tax provision  20   29   84   (6)   20   19 
Total income tax provision $210  $157  $88  $296  $289  $234 

Provision has been made in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for additional income taxes applicable to dividends received or expected to be received, if any, from international subsidiaries. The amount of unremitted earnings of international subsidiaries for which no such tax is provided and which is considered to be permanently reinvested in the subsidiaries totaled $835$1,087 million and $771$999 million at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, respectively. The determination of the amount of the deferred tax liability related to permanently reinvested earnings is not practicable.

A reconciliation of the significant differences between the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate on pre-tax income is as follows:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
Federal statutory income tax rate  35.0  35.0  35.0  35.0%   35.0  35.0
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  3.2   3.1   2.3   2.8   3.2   3.5 
International income taxed at varying rates  (0.4  (0.3  1.0   (2.1)   (1.9  (1.6
Foreign tax credits  (1.8  (1.3  (2.0  (2.8)   (2.5  (2.5
Decrease in valuation allowance        (0.4
Domestic/foreign tax settlements  (2.2  0.3   (2.3  (0.1)   (0.6  (1.1
Federal tax credits  (0.2  (0.6  (0.7  (0.2)   (0.2  (0.2
Other, net  1.0   (0.2  1.4   2.8   2.7   2.2 
Effective income tax rate  34.6  36.0  34.3  35.4%   35.7  35.3


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17.18.  Income Taxes  – (continued)

Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for income tax purposes. Items that give rise to significant portions of the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
                    
Tax loss/credit carryforwards and capital loss $13  $18  $8  $9 
Employee benefits  63   77   97   65 
Property and equipment  160   166   121   137 
Straight-line rent  28   27   39   33 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  20   21 
Other  36   32   34   38 
Total deferred tax assets  320   341   299   282 
Valuation allowance  (4  (5  (5)   (6
Total deferred tax assets, net  316   336  $294  $276 
Deferred tax liabilities:
                    
Merchandise inventories  76   71   104   96 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  20   17 
Other  15   8   6   1 
Total deferred tax liabilities  91   79  $130  $114 
Net deferred tax asset $225  $257  $164  $162 
Balance Sheet caption reported in:                    
Deferred taxes $257  $284  $234  $221 
Other current assets  4   2   5   3 
Accrued and other current liabilities  (31  (24  (62)   (48
Other liabilities  (5  (5  (13)   (14
 $225  $257  $164  $162 

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income, which are based upon the Company’s strategic long-range plans, over the periods in which the temporary differences are anticipated to reverse, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the valuation allowances at January 30, 2016. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted in the future if estimates of taxable income are revised.

As of January 30, 2016, the Company has a valuation allowance of $5 million to reduce its deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. A valuation allowance of $3 million relates to the deferred tax assets arising from a capital loss associated with an impairment of the Northern Group note receivable in 2008. The Company does not anticipate realizing capital gains to utilize the capital loss associated with the note receivable impairment. A valuation allowance of $2 million was recorded against tax loss carryforwards of certain foreign entities. Based on the history of losses and the absence of prudent and feasible business plans for generating future taxable income in certain foreign entities, the Company believes it is more likely than not that the benefit of these loss carryforwards will not be realized.

At January 30, 2016, the Company has state operating loss carryforwards with a potential tax benefit of $2 million that expire between 2021 and 2035. The Company will have, when realized, a capital loss with a potential benefit of $3 million arising from a note receivable. This loss will carryforward for 5 years after realization. The Company has U.S. state credits of $1 million that expire in 2024. The Company has international operating loss carryforwards with a potential tax benefit of $2 million, a portion of which will expire between 2016 and 2034 and a portion of which will never expire. The state and international operating loss carryforwards do not include unrecognized tax benefits.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18.  Income Taxes  – (continued)

The Company operates in multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit. Audits can involve complex issues that may require an extended period of time to resolve. A taxing authority may challenge positions that the Company has adopted in its income tax filings. Accordingly, the Company may apply different tax treatments for transactions in filing its income tax returns than for income tax financial reporting. The Company regularly assesses its tax positions for such transactions and records reserves for those differences.

The Company’s U.S. Federal income tax filings have been examined by the Internal Revenue Service through 2011.2014. The Company is participating in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Process (“CAP”) for 2012,2015, which is expected to conclude during 2013.2016. The Company has started the CAP for 2012.2016. Due to the recent utilization of net operating loss carryforwards, the Company is subject to state and local tax examinations effectively including years from 1996 to the present. To date, no adjustments have been proposed in any audits that will have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

As of February 2, 2013, the Company has a valuation allowance of $4 million to reduce its deferred tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The valuation allowance primarily relates to the deferred tax assets arising from a capital loss associated with the 2008 impairment of the Northern Group note receivable. A full valuation allowance is required for the capital loss because the Company does not anticipate realizing capital gains to utilize this loss. The valuation allowance for state tax loss and credit carryforwards decreased to a nominal amount in 2012 principally due to anticipated expirations of those attributes.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

17.  Income Taxes  – (continued)

Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income, which are based upon the Company’s strategic long-range plans, over the periods in which the temporary differences are anticipated to reverse, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences, net of the valuation allowances at February 2, 2013. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted in the future if estimates of taxable income are revised.

At February 2, 2013, the Company has state operating loss carryforwards with a potential tax benefit of $5 million that expire between 2014 and 2032. The Company will have, when realized, a capital loss with a potential benefit of $3 million arising from a note receivable. This loss will carryforward for 5 years after realization. The Company has U.S. state credits of $2 million that can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company has Canadian provincial credit carryforwards of $1 million expiring betweenJanuary 30, 2016 and 2017. The Company has international operating loss carryforwards with a potential tax benefit of $2 million, expiring between 2013 and 2032.

At February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, the Company had $54$38 million and $65$40 million, respectively of gross unrecognized tax benefits, and $52$37 million and $64$39 million, respectively, of net unrecognized tax benefits that would, if recognized, affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate. The Company has classified certain income tax liabilities as current or noncurrent based on management’s estimate of when these liabilities will be settled. Interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense. Interest was not significant for any of the periods presented. The Company recognized $1 million of interest expenseincome in each of 2012, 2011, and 2010.2013. The total amount of accrued interest and penalties was $3 million, $4 million, and $3$2 million in 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010, respectively.2013.

The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized tax benefits:

      
 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year $  65  $  62  $  70  $40  $48  $54 
Foreign currency translation adjustments  1   (1  3   (2)   (6  (4
Increases related to current year tax positions  4   7   4   4   3   3 
Increases related to prior period tax positions  3   1   3   2   1   4 
Decreases related to prior period tax positions  (3     (7     (1  (2
Settlements  (15  (3  (9  (1)   (1  (7
Lapse of statute of limitations  (1  (1  (2  (5)   (4   
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year $54  $65  $62  $38  $40  $48 

It is reasonably possible that the liability associated with the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within the next twelve months. These changes may be the result of foreign currency fluctuations, ongoing audits or the expiration of statutes of limitations. Settlements could increase earnings in an amount ranging from $0 to $7$5 million based on current estimates. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty. Although management believes that adequate provision has been made for such issues, the ultimate resolution of these issues could have an adverse effect on the earnings of the Company. Conversely, if these issues are resolved favorably in the future, the related provision would be reduced, generating a positive effect on earnings. Due to the uncertainty of amounts and in accordance with its accounting policies, the Company has not recorded any potential impact of these settlements.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18.19.  Financial Instruments and Risk Management

The Company operates internationally and utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to mitigate its foreign currency exposures, primarily related to third-party and intercompany forecasted transactions. As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate this counterparty credit risk, the Company has a practice of entering into contracts only with major financial institutions selected based upon their credit ratings and other financial factors. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties throughout the duration of the derivative instrument.

Additional information is contained within Note 19,20,Fair Value Measurements.

Derivative Holdings Designated as Hedges

For a derivative to qualify as a hedge at inception and throughout the hedged period, the Company formally documents the nature of the hedged items and the relationships between the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk-management objectives, strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions, and the methods of assessing hedge effectiveness and hedge ineffectiveness. In addition, for hedges of forecasted transactions, the significant characteristics and expected terms of a forecasted transaction must be specifically identified, and it must be probable that each forecasted transaction would occur. If it were deemed probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument would be recognized in earnings immediately. No such gains or losses were recognized in earnings for any of the periods presented. Derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged, both at inception and throughout the hedged period, which management evaluates periodically.

The primary currencies to which the Company is exposed are the euro, British pound, Canadian dollar, and Australian dollar. For the most part, merchandise inventories are purchased by each geographic area in their respective local currency. The exception to this is the United Kingdom, whose merchandise inventory purchases are denominated in euros.

For option and forward foreign exchange forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges of the purchase of inventory, the effective portion of gains and losses is deferred as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCL”) and is recognized as a component of cost of sales when the related inventory is sold. The amount reclassified to cost of sales andrelated to such contracts was not significant for any of the periods presented.

The effective portion of gains or losses associated with other forward contracts is deferred as a component of AOCL until the underlying transaction is reported in earnings. The ineffective portion of gains and losses related to such contractscash flow hedges recorded to earnings was not significant for any of the periods presented. When using a forward contract as a hedging instrument, the Company excludes the time value of the contract from the assessment of effectiveness. At each quarter-end,As of January 30, 2016, all of the Company had notCompany’s hedged forecasted transactions for moreare less than the next twelve months, and the Company expects all derivative-related amounts reported in AOCL to be reclassified to earnings within twelve months. During 2012,2015, the net changeschange in the fair value of the contractsforeign exchange derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges of the purchase of inventory resulted in a gain of $4$5 million and therefore decreased AOCL, this resulted in a gain of $2 million included in AOCL as of January 30, 2016.

The notional value of the contracts outstanding at January 30, 2016 was $72 million and these contracts mature at various dates through January 2017.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19.  Financial Instruments and Risk Management  – (continued)

Derivative Holdings Not Designated as Hedges

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts that are not designated as hedges in order to manage the costs of foreign currency-denominated merchandise purchases and intercompany transactions. Changes in the fair value of these foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded in earnings immediately within selling, general and administrative expenses. The net change in fair value was $1 million in 2015, was not significant for the year ended February 2,2014, and was $1 million for 2013. The notional value of the contracts outstanding at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 was $66$13 million, and these contracts extendmature at various dates through January 2014.March 2016.

Derivative Holdings Designated as Non-Hedges

The Company mitigates the effect of fluctuating foreign exchange rates on the reporting of foreign-currency denominatedforeign currency-denominated earnings by entering into currency option contracts. Changes in the fair value of these foreign currency option contracts, which are not designated as non-hedges,hedges, are recorded in earnings immediately within other income. The realized gains, premiums paid, and changes in the fair market value recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were not significant for any of the periods presented.2015, and was $1 million for 2014. There were no contracts outstanding at February 2, 2013.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18.  Financial Instruments and Risk Management  – (continued)

The Company also enters into forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge foreign-currency denominated merchandise purchases and intercompany transactions that are not designated as hedges. In addition, the Company enters into spot contracts to hedge non-euro foreign currency denominated transactions that are not designated as hedges. Net changes in the fair value of foreign exchange derivative financial instruments designated as non-hedges were substantially offset by the changes in value of the underlying transactions, which were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. The net change in fair value was not significant for any of the periods presented. The notional value of the contracts outstanding at February 2, 2013 was $33 million and these contracts extend through June 2013.January 30, 2016.

Additionally, the Company enters into diesel fuel forward and option contracts to mitigate a portion of the Company’s freight expense due to the variability caused by fuel surcharges imposed by our third-party freight carriers. Changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in earnings immediately. The effect was not significant for any of the periods presented. The notional value of the diesel fuel forward contracts outstanding at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 was $2$1 million and these contracts extendmature at various dates through May 2013.2016.

Fair Value of Derivative Contracts

The following represents the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts. Many of the Company’s agreements allow for a netting arrangement. The following is presented on a gross basis, by type of contract:

   
(in millions) Balance Sheet Caption 2012 2011
Hedging Instruments:               
Forward foreign exchange contracts  Current asset  $  4  $  — 
Forward foreign exchange contracts  Current liability  $  $2 
Non-hedging Instruments:               
Forward foreign exchange contracts  Current asset  $2  $ 
   
($ in millions) Balance Sheet Caption 2015 2014
Hedging Instruments:
               
Foreign exchange forward contracts  Current assets  $3  $ — 
Foreign exchange forward contracts  Current liabilities  $  $4 
Non-hedging Instruments:
               
Foreign exchange forward contracts  Current liabilities  $ —  $1 

Notional Values and Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

The table below presents the notional amounts for all outstanding derivatives and the weighted-average exchange rates of foreign exchange forward contracts at February 2, 2013:January 30, 2016:

    
 Contract Value (U.S. in millions) Weighted-Average Exchange Rate Contract Value
($ in millions)
 Weighted-Average
Exchange Rate
Inventory                    
Buy €/Sell British £ $  66   .8060  $72   0.7359 
Buy US/Sell €  4   .7652 
Intercompany
                    
Buy €/Sell British £ $26   .8144  $11   0.7298 
Buy US/Sell CAD $3   .9888  $2   1.4080 
Diesel fuel forwards $2     $1    

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

18.  Financial Instruments and Risk Management  – (continued)

Business Risk

The retailing business is highly competitive. Price, quality, selection of merchandise, reputation, store location, advertising, and customer service are important competitive factors in the Company’s business. The Company operates in 23 countries and purchased approximately 8690 percent of its merchandise in 20122015 from its top 5 vendors.suppliers. In 2012,2015, the Company purchased approximately 6572 percent of its athletic merchandise from one


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19.  Financial Instruments and Risk Management  – (continued)

major vendor,supplier, Nike, Inc. (“Nike”), and approximately 1711 percent from another major vendor.supplier. Each of our operating divisions is highly dependent on Nike; they individually purchased 4855 to 7782 percent of their merchandise from Nike. The Company generally considers all vendor relations to be satisfactory.

Included in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, are the net assets of the Company’s European operations, which total $909$904 million and which are located in 19 countries, 11 of which have adopted the euro as their functional currency.

19.20.  Fair Value Measurements

The following table provides a summary of the recognized assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

            
 As of February 2, 2013 As of January 28, 2012 As of January 30, 2016 As of January 31, 2015
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Assets                                                            
Short-term investments $  —  $  48  $  —  $  —  $  —  $  — 
Auction rate security     6         5    
Forward foreign exchange contracts     6             
Available-for-sale securities $ —  $6  $ —  $ —  $6  $ — 
Foreign exchange forward contracts     3             
Total Assets $  $60  $  $  $5  $  $  $9  $  $  $6  $ 
Liabilities                                                            
Forward foreign exchange contracts              2    
Foreign exchange forward contracts              5    
Total Liabilities $  $  $  $  $2  $  $  $ —  $  $  $5  $ 

Available-for-sale securitiesSecurities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, in other comprehensive income, unless unrealized losses are determined to be other than temporary. As of February 2, 2013, the Company held $54 million of available-for-sale securities, which was comprised of $48 million in short-term investments and a $6 million auction rate security.

Short-term investments represent corporate bonds with maturity dates within one year from the purchase date. These securities are valued using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and therefore are classified as Level 2 instruments. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments.

The fair value of the auction rate security is determined by review of the underlying security at each reporting period.using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets and accordingly is classified as a Level 2 instrument.

The Company’s derivative financial instruments are valued using market-based inputs to valuation models. These valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, and measures of volatility.

Interest income related to the short-term investments included within interest expense was not significant for 2012.volatility and therefore are classified as Level 2 instruments.

There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 assets and liabilities for any of the periods presented.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

19.  Fair Value Measurements  – (continued)

The following table provides a summary of recognized assets that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. See Note 3,Impairment Charges, for further discussion and additional disclosures.

    
(in millions) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Loss
Recognized
Year ended February 2, 2013:
                    
Intangible assets $  —  $  —  $  3  $  7 
Long-lived assets held and used $  $  $  $5 
Year ended January 28, 2012: 
Intangible assets $  $  $10  $5 

The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases were as follows:

  
 2012 2011
   (in millions)
Carrying Value $133  $135 
Fair Value $152  $140 
  
  2015 2014
   ($ in millions)
Carrying value $130  $134 
Fair value $156  $163 

The fair value of long-term debt is determined by using quoted pricesmodel-derived valuations in which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in active markets and therefore isare classified as Level 2.

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and other current receivables and payables approximate their fair value.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits

Pension and Other Postretirement Plans

The Company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain of its North American employees, which are funded in accordance with the provisions of the laws where the plans are in effect. In addition, to providing pension benefits, the Company has a defined benefit plan for certain individuals of Runners Point Group. The Company also sponsors postretirement medical and life insurance plans, which are available to most of its retired U.S. employees. These plans are contributory and are not funded. The measurement date of the assets and liabilities is the last day of themonth-end date that is closest to our fiscal year.

year end. The following tables set forth the plans’ changes in benefit obligations and plan assets, funded status, and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, measured at February 2, 2013as of January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012:31, 2015:

    
 Pension
Benefits
 Postretirement
Benefits
   2012 2011 2012 2011
   (in millions)
Change in benefit obligation                    
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $704  $669  $15  $12 
Service cost  13   12       
Interest cost  28   32      1 
Plan participants’ contributions        2   3 
Actuarial loss  15   47   1   2 
Foreign currency translation adjustments     (1      
Plan amendment           1 
Benefits paid  (54  (55  (3  (4
Benefit obligation at end of year $706  $704  $15  $15 
Pension BenefitsPostretirement Benefits
2015201420152014
($ in millions)
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$722$674$19$15
Service cost1715
Interest cost242811
Plan participants’ contributions12
Actuarial (gain) loss(39)67(5)4
Foreign currency translation adjustments(6)(9
Benefits paid(51)(53(2)(3
Benefit obligation at end of year$667$722$14$19
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year$686$650
Actual (loss) return on plan assets(34)90
Employer contributions89
Foreign currency translation adjustments(7)(10
Benefits paid(51)(53
Fair value of plan assets at end of year$602$686
Funded status$(65)$(36$(14)$(19
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet:
Other assets$8$13$ —$ —
Accrued and other liabilities(4)(3(1)(1
Other liabilities(69)(46(13)(18
$(65)$(36$(14)$(19
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax:
Net loss (gain)$410$394$(10)$(6
Prior service cost11
$411$395$(10)$(6


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

    
 Pension
Benefits
 Postretirement
Benefits
   2012 2011 2012 2011
   (in millions)
Change in plan assets                    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $639  $601           
Actual return on plan assets  59   63           
Employer contributions  29   31           
Foreign currency translation adjustments     (1          
Benefits paid  (54  (55      
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $673  $639       
Funded status $(33 $(65 $(15 $(15
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet:                    
Other assets $7  $8  $  $ 
Accrued and other liabilities  (3  (3  (1  (1
Other liabilities  (37  (70  (14  (14
   $(33 $(65 $(15 $(15
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax:                    
Net loss (gain) $426  $446  $(16 $(21
Prior service cost (credit)  1   1       
   $427  $447  $(16 $(21

As of February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, the Canadian qualified pension plan’s assets exceeded its accumulated benefit obligation. Information for those pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows:

    
 2012 2011 2015 2014
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Projected benefit obligation $625  $619  $617  $662 
Accumulated benefit obligation  625   619   617   662 
Fair value of plan assets  585   546   544   613 

The following tables set forth the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) at February 2, 2013:January 30, 2016:

    
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits Pension
Benefits
 Postretirement
Benefits
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Net actuarial loss (gain) at beginning of year $446  $(21 $394  $(6
Amortization of net (loss) gain  (17  4   (14  1 
(Gain) loss arising during the year  (3  1 
Loss (gain) arising during the year  34   (5
Foreign currency fluctuations  (4   
Net actuarial loss (gain) at end of year(1) $426  $(16 $410  $(10
Net prior service cost at end of year(1) $1  $ 
Net prior service cost at end of year (2)  1    
Total amount recognized $427  $(16 $411  $(10

(1)The net prior service cost did not change during the year. The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (income) during the next year are approximately $17$14 million and $(3)$(2) million related to the pension and postretirement plans, respectively.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

(2)The net prior service cost did not change during the year and is not expected to change significantly during the next year.

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the benefit obligations under the plans:

        
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
 2012 2011 2012 2011 2015 2014 2015 2014
Discount rate  3.79  4.16  3.70  4.00  4.1%   3.4  4.1%   3.4
Rate of compensation increase  3.68  3.69            3.7%   3.7          

Pension expense is actuarially calculated annually based on data available at the beginning of each year. The expected return on plan assets is determined by multiplying the expected long-term rate of return on assets by the market-related value of plan assets for the U.S. qualified pension plan and market value for the Canadian qualified pension plan. The market-related value of plan assets is a calculated value that recognizes investment gains and losses in fair value related to equities over three or five years, depending on which computation results in a market-related value closer to market value. Market-related value for the U.S. qualified plan was $550$604 million and $476$557 million for 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

Assumptions used in the calculation of net benefit cost include the discount rate selected and disclosed at the end of the previous year as well as other assumptions detailed in the table below:

            
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Discount rate  4.16  4.99  5.25  4.00  4.60  4.90  3.4%   4.3  3.8  3.4%   4.2  3.7
Rate of compensation increase  3.68  3.69  3.68                 3.7%   3.7  3.7               
Expected long-term rate of return on assets  6.63  6.59  7.22                 6.1%   6.3  6.2               

The expected long-term rate of return on invested plan assets is based on the plans’ weighted-average target asset allocation, as well as historical and future expected performance of those assets. The target asset allocation is selected to obtain an investment return that is sufficient to cover the expected benefit payments and to reduce future contributions by the Company.

The components of net benefit expense (income) are:

            
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Service cost $  13  $  12  $  13  $  —  $  —  $  —  $17  $15  $14  $ —  $ —  $ — 
Interest cost  28   32   33      1      24   28   25   1   1   1 
Expected return on plan assets  (40  (40  (40           (39)   (38  (39         
Amortization of prior service cost              (1   
Amortization of net loss (gain)  17   15   17   (4  (5  (6  14   15   17   (1)   (3  (3
Net benefit expense (income) $18  $19  $23  $(4 $(5 $(6 $16  $20  $17  $  $(2 $(2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

Beginning with 2001, new retirees were charged the expected full cost of the medical plan and then-existing retirees will incur 100 percent of the expected future increases in medical plan costs. Any changes in the health care cost trend rates assumed would not affect the accumulated benefit obligation or net benefit income, since retirees will incur 100 percent of such expected future increase.increases.

The Company maintains a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which is an unfunded plan that includes provisions for the continuation of medical and dental insurance benefits to certain executive officers and other key employees of the Company (“SERP Medical Plan”). The SERP Medical Plan’s accumulated projected benefit obligation at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 was approximately $10$11 million.

The following weighted-average initial and ultimate cost trend rate assumptions were used to determine the benefit obligations under the SERP Medical Plan:

            
 Medical Trend Rate Dental Trend Rate Medical Trend Rate Dental Trend Rate
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Initial cost trend rate  7.50  8.00  8.50  5.00  5.50  5.50  7.0%   7.0  7.0  5.0%   5.0  5.0
Ultimate cost trend rate  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.0%   5.0  5.0  5.0%   5.0  5.0
Year that the ultimate cost trend rate is reached  2018   2018   2016   2013   2013   2012   2021   2019   2018   2016   2015   2014 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

The following weighted-average initial and ultimate cost trend rate assumptions were used to determine the net periodic cost under the SERP Medical Plan:

         ��  
 Medical Trend Rate Dental Trend Rate Medical Trend Rate Dental Trend Rate
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Initial cost trend rate  8.00  8.50  9.00  5.50  5.50  6.00  7.0%   7.0  7.5  5.0%   5.0  5.0
Ultimate cost trend rate  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  5.0%   5.0  5.0  5.0%   5.0  5.0
Year that the ultimate cost trend rate is reached  2018   2016   2016   2013   2012   2012   2019   2018   2018   2015   2014   2013 

A one percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects on the SERP Medical Plan:

    
 1% Increase 1% (Decrease) 1% Increase 1% (Decrease)
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Effect on total service and interest cost components $  —  $  —  $ —  $ — 
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation  2   (2  2   (2

In 2014 and 2015, the Company used the RP 2000 mortality table with generational projection using scale AA for both males and females. The RP 2000 table was selected because it resulted in the closest match to the Company’s actual experience. For the SERP Medical Plan, the mortality assumption was updated in 2015 to the RPH 2015 table with generational projection using MP 2015, while in the prior year period we used the RP 2014 table with generational projection using MP 2014.

Plan Assets

During 2012,The target composition of the Company’s Canadian qualified pension plan assets is 95 percent fixed-income securities and 5 percent equity. The Company believes that plan assets are invested in a prudent manner with the same overall objective and investment strategy as noted below for the U.S. pension plan. The bond portfolio is comprised of government and corporate bonds chosen to match the duration of the pension plan’s benefit payment obligations. This current asset allocation will limit future volatility with regard to the funded status of the plan. This allocation has resulted in higher pension expense due to the lower long-term rate of return associated with fixed-income securities.

The target composition of the Company’s U.S. qualified pension plan assets was 4560 percent fixed-income securities, 36.5 percent equity, and 553.5 percent fixed-income securities.real estate investment trust. The Company may alter the targets from time to time depending on market conditions and the funding requirements of the pension plan. This current asset allocation willis expected to limit volatility with regard to the funded status of the plan, but will result in higher pension expense due to the lower long-term rate of return associated with fixed-income securities. Due to market conditions and other factors, actual asset allocations may vary from the target allocation outlined above.

The Company believes that plan assets are invested in a prudent manner with an objective of providing a total return that, over the long term, provides sufficient assets to fund benefit obligations, taking into account the Company’s expected contributions and the level of risk deemed appropriate. The Company’s investment strategy seeks to utilize asset classes with differing rates of return, volatility, and correlation in order to reduce risk by providing diversification relative to equities. Diversification within asset classes is also utilized to ensure that there are no significant concentrations of risk in plan assets and to reduce the effect that the return on any single investment may have on the entire portfolio.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

The target composition of the Company’s Canadian plan assets is 95 percent debt securities and 5 percent equity. The Company believes that plan assets are invested in a prudent manner with the same overall objective and investment strategy as noted above for the U.S. pension plan. The bond portfolio is comprised of government and corporate bonds chosen to match the duration of the pension plan’s benefit payment obligations. This current asset allocation will limit future volatility with regard to the funded status of the plan. This allocation has resulted in higher pension expense due to the lower long-term rate of return associated with fixed-income securities.

Valuation of Investments

Significant portions of plan assets are invested in commingled trust funds. These funds are valued at the net asset value of units held by the plan at year end. Stocks traded on U.S. and Canadian security exchanges are valued at closing market prices on the measurement date.

The fair values of the Company’s U.S.Canadian pension plan assets at February 2, 2013January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012 are31, 2015 were as follows:

Level 1Level 2Level 32012
Total
2011
Total*
(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents$  —$4$  —$4$13
Equity securities:
U.S. large-cap(1)123123120
U.S. mid-cap(1)373742
International(2)808072
Corporate stock(3)141411
Fixed-income securities:
Long duration corporate and government bonds(4)231231221
Intermediate duration corporate and government bonds(5)727258
Other types of investments:
Real estate(6)8
Real estate securities(7)2323
Insurance contracts111
Total assets at fair value$14$571$$585$546
     
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 2015
Total
 2014
Total*
   ($ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents $ —  $2  $ —  $2  $3 
Equity securities:
                         
Canadian and international(1)  4         4   5 
Fixed-income securities:
                         
Cash matched bonds(2)     52      52   65 
Total assets at fair value $4  $54  $  $58  $73 

*Each category of plan assets is classified within the same level of the fair value hierarchy for 20122015 and 2011.
(1)These categories consist of various managed funds that invest primarily in common stocks, as well as other equity securities and a combination of other funds.
(2)This category comprises three managed funds that invest primarily in international common stocks, as well as other equity securities and a combination of other funds.
(3)This category consists of the Company’s common stock.
(4)This category consists of various fixed-income funds that invest primarily in long-term bonds, as well as a combination of other funds, that together are designed to exceed the performance of related long-term market indices.
(5)This category consists of a fixed-income fund that invests primarily in intermediate duration bonds, as well as a combination of other funds, that together are designed to track the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Credit Index.
(6)This category in 2011 consisted of two real estate properties, which were subsequently sold to a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company during 2012.
(7)This category in 2012 consists of one fund that invests in global real estate securities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of the U.S. pension plan’s real estate investments classified as Level 3:

 
(in millions) Level 3
Balance at January 29, 2011 $  9 
Unrealized loss on appraised value of real estate  (1
Balance at January 28, 2012 $8 
Sale of real estate  (8
Balance at February 2, 2013 $ 

The fair values of the Company’s Canadian pension plan assets at February 2, 2013 and January 28, 2012 are as follows:

     
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 2012
Total
 2011
Total*
   (in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents $  —  $  2  $  —  $  2  $  5 
Equity securities:                         
Canadian and international(1)  5         5   5 
Debt securities:                         
Cash matched bonds(2)     81      81   83 
Total assets at fair value $5  $83  $  $88  $93 

*Each category of plan assets is classified within the same level of the fair value hierarchy for 2012 and 2011.2014.
(1)This category comprises one mutual fund that invests primarily in a diverse portfolio of Canadian securities.
(2)This category consists of fixed-income securities, including strips and coupons, issued or guaranteed by the Government of Canada, provinces or municipalities of Canada including their agencies and crown corporations, as well as other governmental bonds and corporate bonds.

No Level 3 assets were held by the Canadian pension plan during 20122015 and 2011.2014.

The fair values of the Company’s U.S. pension plan assets at January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 were as follows:

     
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 2015
Total
 2014
Total*
   ($ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents $ —  $1  $ —  $1  $1 
Equity securities:
                         
U.S. large-cap(1)     93      93   102 
U.S. mid-cap(1)     26      26   31 
International(2)     61      61   71 
Corporate stock(3)  27         27   21 
Fixed-income securities:
                         
Long duration corporate and government bonds(4)     217      217   254 
Intermediate duration corporate and government bonds(5)     99      99   110 
Other types of investments:
                         
Real estate securities(6)     17      17   20 
Insurance contracts     1      1   1 
Other(7)     2      2   2 
Total assets at fair value $27  $517  $  $544  $613 
*Each category of plan assets is classified within the same level of the fair value hierarchy for 2015 and 2014.
(1)These categories consist of various managed funds that invest primarily in common stocks, as well as other equity securities and a combination of other funds.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

(2)This category comprises three managed funds that invest primarily in international common stocks, as well as other equity securities and a combination of other funds.
(3)This category consists of the Company’s common stock. The increase from the prior year is due to price appreciation. No additional stock was contributed during the year.
(4)This category consists of various fixed-income funds that invest primarily in long-term bonds, as well as a combination of other funds, that together are designed to exceed the performance of related long-term market indices.
(5)This category consists of two fixed-income funds that invest primarily in intermediate duration bonds, as well as a combination of other funds, that together are designed to exceed the performance of related indices.
(6)This category consists of one fund that invests in global real estate securities.
(7)This category consists primarily of cash related to net pending trade purchases and sales.

No Level 3 assets were held by the U.S. pension plan during 2015 and 2014.

During 2012,2015, the Company made contributionsa contribution of $25 million and $1$4 million to its U.S. and Canadian qualified pension plans, respectively.plan. Subsequent to year end, in February 2016, the Company contributed $25 million to its U.S. qualified pension plan. The Company continuously evaluates the amount and timing of any future contributions. The Company expects to contribute $2 million in 2013 toFuture contributions are dependent on several factors, including the Canadian qualified plan. Additional contributions will depend onoutcome of the plan asset performance and other factors.ongoing U.S. pension litigation. See Note 23,Legal Proceedings, for further information. During 2012,2015, the Company also paid $3$4 million in pension benefits related to its non-qualified pension plans.

Estimated future benefit payments for each of the next five years and the five years thereafter are as follows:

  
 Pension Benefits Postretirement Benefits
   (in millions)
2013 $73  $  1 
2014  58   1 
2015  55   1 
2016  53   1 
2017  50   1 
2018 – 2022  221   4 
  
  Pension
Benefits
 Postretirement Benefits
   ($ in millions)
2016 $71  $1 
2017  54   1 
2018  52   1 
2019  51   1 
2020  50   1 
2021 – 2025  231   3 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20.  Retirement Plans and Other Benefits  – (continued)

Savings Plans

The Company has two qualified savings plans, a 401(k) Planplan that is available to employees whose primary place of employment is the U.S., and an 1165(e) Plananother plan that is available to employees whose primary place of employment is in Puerto Rico. Both plans require that thelimit participation to employees who have attained at least the age of twenty-one and have completed one year of service consisting of at least 1,000 hours in order to participate.hours. As of January 1, 2013,2016, the savings plans allow eligible employees to contribute up to 40 percent (maximum of $17,500)their compensation on a pre-tax basis, subject to a maximum of $18,000 for the U.S. plan and $15,000 for the Puerto Rico plan of their compensation on a pre-tax basis.plan. The Company matches 25 percent of employees’ pre-tax contributions on up to the first 4 percent of the employees’ compensation (subject to certain limitations). Matching contributions made before January 1, 2016 were made with Company stock and suchstock. Matching contributions made after January 1, 2016 will be made in cash. Such matching Company contributions are vested incrementally over the first 5 years of participation for both plans. The charge to operations for the Company’s matching contribution was $3 million in 2012 and $2 million in each of 2011 and 2010.for all years presented.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.22.  Share-Based Compensation

Stock Awards

Under the Company’s 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Stock Plan”), stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, (SARs), or other stock-based awards may be granted to officers and other employees of the Company, including its subsidiaries and operating divisions worldwide. Nonemployee directors are also eligible to receive awards under this plan. Options for employees become exercisable in substantially equal annual installments over a three-year period, beginning with the first anniversary of the date of grant of the option, unless a shorter or longer duration is established at the time of the option grant. Options for nonemployee directors become exercisable one year from the date of grant. On May 19, 2010, the 2007 Stock Plan was amended to increase the maximum number of shares of stock reserved for all awards to 12,000,000. The options terminate up to ten years from the date of grant. On May 21, 2014, the 2007 Stock Plan was amended to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for all awards to 14 million shares. As of January 30, 2016, there were 13,038,597 shares available for issuance under this plan.

Employees Stock Purchase Plan

Under the Company’s 20032013 Foot Locker Employees Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”(“ESPP”), participating employees are able to contribute up to 10 percent of their annual compensation, not to exceed $25,000 in any plan year, through payroll deductions to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock at 85 percent of the lower market price on one of two specified dates in each plan year. Under the ESPP, 3,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for purchase beginning June 2005. Of the 3,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for purchase under this plan, 943996 participating employees purchased 218,362124,494 shares in 2012,2015, and 919958 participating employees purchased 336,116160,859 shares in 2011. To date, a total2014. As of 1,496,407January 30, 2016, there were 2,714,647 shares have been purchasedavailable for purchase under this plan.

Share-Based Compensation Expense

Total compensation expense included in SG&A and the associated tax benefits recognized related to the Company’s share-based compensation plans was $20 million, $18 million, and $13 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The associated tax benefits recognized for 2012, 2011, and 2010 were $6 million, $6 million, and $4 million, respectively. Tax deductions in excess of the cumulative compensation cost recognized for share-based compensation arrangements were $11 million, $5 million, and $3 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively, and are classified as financing activities within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.follows:

   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Options and shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan $11  $13  $12 
Restricted stock and restricted stock units  11   11   13 
Total share-based compensation expense $22  $24  $25 
Tax benefit recognized $8  $7  $8 
Excess income tax benefit from settled equity-classified share-based awards reported as a cash flow from financing activities $35  $12  $9 

Valuation Model and Assumptions

The Company uses a Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model incorporates various and highly subjective assumptions, including expected term and expected volatility.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

The Company estimates the expected term of share-based awards granted using the Company’s historical exercise and post-vesting employment termination patterns, which it believes are representative of future behavior. The expected term for the employee stock purchase plan valuation is based on the length of each purchase period as measured at the beginning of the offering period, which is one year.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

The Company estimates the expected volatility of its common stock at the grant date using a weighted-average of the Company’s historical volatility and implied volatility from traded options on the Company’s common stock. The Company believes that the combination of historical volatility and implied volatility provides a better estimate of future stock price volatility.

The risk-free interest rate assumption is determined using the Federal Reserve nominal rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award being valued. The expected dividend yield is derived from the Company’s historical experience.

The Company records stock-basedshare-based compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate based on its historical pre-vesting forfeiture data. The Company estimates pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and periodically revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The following table shows the Company’s assumptions used to compute the share-based compensation expense:

            
 Stock Option Plans Stock Purchase Plan Stock Option Plans Stock Purchase Plan
 2012 2011 2010 2012 2011 2010 2015 2014 2013 2015 2014 2013
Weighted-average risk free rate of interest  1.49  2.07  2.34  0.22  0.31  0.85  1.5%   2.1  1.0  0.2%   0.1  0.2
Expected volatility  43  45  45  38  37  39  30%   39  42  25%   24  40
Weighted-average expected award life- in years  5.5   5.0   5.0   1.0   1.0   1.0 
Weighted-average expected award life (in years)  6.0   6.1   6.0   1.0   1.0   1.0 
Dividend yield  2.3  3.5  4.0  2.5  3.4  4.8  1.6%   1.9  2.3  1.6%   2.0  2.3
Weighted-average
fair value
 $10.13  $5.86  $4.47  $6.11  $3.91  $2.54  $16.07  $15.30  $10.98  $10.47  $7.35  $5.79 

Compensation expense related to the Company’s stock options and employee stock purchase plan was $10 million, $8 million, and $5 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. As of February 2, 2013, there was $5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of approximately 1 year.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

The information set forth in the following table covers options granted under the Company’s stock option plans:

         
 2012 2011 2010 Number of Shares Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life Weighted- Average Exercise
Price
 Number of Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price Number of Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price Number of Shares Weighted- Average Exercise Price (in thousands) (in years) (per share)
 (in thousands, except prices per share)
Options outstanding at beginning of year  7,227  $18.44   7,220  $17.17   7,002  $16.88 
Options outstanding at January 31, 2015  5,569       $25.89 
Granted  940  $30.96   1,612  $19.13   1,311  $15.10   694        62.29 
Exercised  (2,213 $19.67   (1,454 $13.02   (942 $11.65   (2,511       25.50 
Expired or cancelled  (47 $23.74   (151 $17.38   (151 $20.41   (58       49.17 
Options outstanding at end of year  5,907  $19.93   7,227  $18.44   7,220  $17.17 
Options outstanding at January 30, 2016  3,694   5.6  $32.62 
Options exercisable at end of year  3,593  $17.83   4,598  $19.35   5,088  $18.81   2,495   4.1  $22.56 
Options available for future grant at end of year  5,518      7,155      10,339    
Options vested and expected to vest  3,662   5.5  $32.40 

The total fair value of options vested during 2015, 2014, and 2013 was $15 million, $9 million, and $8 million, respectively.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

The Company received $64 million in cash from option exercises for the year ended January 30, 2016. The total intrinsic value of options exercised (the difference between the market price of the Company’s common stock on the exercise date and the price paid by the optionee to exercise the option) is presented below:

   
 2012 2011 2010
   (in millions)
Exercised $  29  $  15  $  5 
   
  2015 2014 2013
   ($ in millions)
Exercised $99  $22  $21 

The tax benefit realized from option exercises was $38 million, $8 million, and $7 million for 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively.

The aggregate intrinsic value for stock options outstanding, outstanding and for stock options exercisable, and vested and expected to vest (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options) is presented below:

    
 2012 2011 2010 2015
 (in millions) ($ in millions)
Outstanding $  86  $  59  $  23  $129 
Outstanding and exercisable $60  $33  $13  $112 
Vested and expected to vest $129 

The Company received $43As of January 30, 2016, there was $7 million in cash from option exercises for the year ended February 2, 2013. The tax benefit realized from option exercises was $11 million, $6 million, and $2 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010 respectively.of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of 1.4 years.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 2, 2013:January 30, 2016:

     
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices Number Outstanding Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual
Life
 Weighted- Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable Weighted- Average
Exercise Price
   (in thousands, except prices per share and contractual life)
$ 9.85 to $15.10  2,157   6.30  $12.62   1,763  $12.07 
$15.74 to $23.92  2,127   6.39  $20.38   1,180  $21.61 
$24.04 to $35.50  1,623   6.21  $29.03   650  $26.62 
    5,907   6.31  $19.93   3,593  $17.83 

Changes in the Company’s nonvested options at February 2, 2013 are summarized as follows:

  
 Number of Shares Weighted- Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
per share
   (in thousands, except
prices per share)
Nonvested at January 28, 2012  2,629  $16.84 
Granted  940   30.96 
Vested  (1,208  15.42 
Expired or cancelled  (47  23.74 
Nonvested at February 2, 2013  2,314  $23.18 
     
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices Number
Outstanding
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 Number
Exercisable
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
   (in thousands, except prices per share and contractual life)
$9.85 to $18.80  858   2.7  $13.32   858  $13.32 
$18.84 to $24.75  855   3.3   19.80   855   19.80 
$30.92 to $36.59  784   6.5   32.84   611   32.44 
$45.08 to $73.21  1,197   8.7   55.48   171   47.42 
    3,694   5.6  $32.62   2,495  $22.56 

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

Restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and restricted stock units have been(“RSU”) may be awarded to certain officers and key employees of the Company. AwardsRSU awards are made to executives outside of the United States and to nonemployee directors are made in the form of restricted stock units.directors. Each restricted stock unitRSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock provided that the vesting conditions are satisfied. In 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, there were 1,254,876, 1,098,177,588,308, 755,936, and 653,535 restricted stock units1,027,542 RSU awards outstanding, respectively.

Generally, awards fully vest after the passage of time, typically three years. However, restricted stock unit grantsRSU awards made in connection with the Company’s long-term incentive program vest after the attainment of certain performance metrics and the passage of time. Restricted stock is considered outstanding at the time of grant and the holders have voting rights. Dividends are paid to holders of restricted stock that vest with the passage of time; fortime. With


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

regards to performance-based restricted stock, dividends will be accumulated and paid after the performance criteria are met. No dividends are paid or accumulated on restricted stock units.RSU awards.

Compensation expense is recognized using the fair market value at the date of grant and is amortized over the vesting period, provided the recipient continues to be employed by the Company.

Restricted share and RSU activity is summarized as follows:

   
  Number of
Shares
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
 Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
   (in thousands) (in years) (per share)
Nonvested at beginning of year  1,038       $37.96 
Granted  155        63.73 
Vested  (322       32.34 
Expired or cancelled  (68       37.97 
Nonvested at end of year  803   0.8  $45.19 
Aggregate value ($ in millions) $36           

The Company recorded compensation expense related to restricted shares, nettotal fair value of estimated forfeitures, ofawards for which restrictions lapsed was $10 million, $10$14 million, and $8$9 million for 2012, 2011,2015, 2014, and 2010,2013, respectively. At February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, there was $10 million of total unrecognized compensation cost net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested restricted stock awards.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

21.  Share-Based Compensation  – (continued)

Restricted share and unit activity is summarized as follows:

   
 Number of Shares and Units
   2012 2011 2010
   (in thousands)
Outstanding at beginning of year  2,068   1,759   1,680 
Granted  278   686   651 
Vested  (782  (327  (492
Cancelled or forfeited     (50  (80
Outstanding at end of year  1,564   2,068   1,759 
Aggregate value (in millions) $30  $30  $20 
Weighted-average remaining contractual life  0.84 years   1.19 years   1.44 years 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share was $30.89, $20.18, and $13.75 for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The total fair value of awards for which restrictions lapsed was $8 million, $4 million, and $10 million for 2012, 2011, and 2010 respectively.

22.23.  Legal Proceedings

Legal proceedings pending against the Company or its consolidated subsidiaries consist of ordinary, routine litigation, including administrative proceedings, incidental to the business of the Company or businesses that have been sold or disposed of by the Company in past years. These legal proceedings include commercial, intellectual property, customer, environmental, and labor-and-employment-relatedemployment-related claims.

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are defendants in a number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts containing various class action allegations under federal or state wage and hour laws, including allegations concerning unpaid overtime, meal and rest breaks, and uniforms.

The Company is a defendant in one such case in which plaintiff alleges that the Company permitted unpaid off-the-clock hours in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and state labor laws. The case,Pereira v. Foot Locker, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in 2007. In his complaint, in addition to unpaid wage and overtime allegations, plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. In 2009, the Court conditionally certified a nationwide collective action. During the course of 2010, notices were sent to approximately 81,888 current and former employees of the Company offering them the opportunity to participate in the class action, and approximately 5,027 have opted in.

The Company is a defendant in additional purported wage and hour class actions that assert claims similar to those asserted inPereira and seek similar remedies. With the exception ofHill v. Foot Locker filed in state court in Illinois in 2011,Echeverria filed in state court of California,Ghattas filed in state court of California, andCortes v. Foot Locker filed in federal court of New York, all of these actions were consolidated by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation withPereiraunder the captionIn re Foot Locker, Inc. Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation.The consolidated cases are in the discovery stages of proceedings. InHill v. Foot Locker, in May 2011, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion for certification of an opt-out class covering certain Illinois employees only. The Company's motion for leave to appeal was denied. The Company has had and continues to have discussions with plaintiff’s counsel in an attempt to determine whether it will be possible to resolve the consolidated cases andHill. Meanwhile, the Company is vigorously defending these class actions. Due to the inherent uncertainties of such matters, and because fact and expert discovery have not been completed, the Company is currently unable to make an estimate of the range of loss.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

22.  Legal Proceedings  – (continued)

The Company and the Company’s U.S. retirement plan are defendants in a purported class action (Osberg v. Foot Locker Inc.et ano., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) in which the plaintiff alleges that, in connection with the 1996 conversion of the retirement plan to a defined benefit plan with a cash balance formula, the Company and the retirement plan failed to properly advise plan participants of the “wear-away” effect of the conversion. Plaintiff assertsPlaintiff’s claims were for breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (ERISA)as amended, and violation of the statutory provisions governing the content of the Summary Plan Description. Claims for alleged violationsThe trial was held in July 2015 and the court issued a decision in September 2015 in favor of the notice provisionclass on the foregoing claims. The court ordered that the Plan be reformed. The Company is appealing the court’s decision, and the judgment has been stayed pending the outcome of Section 204(h)the appeal. As a result of ERISAthis development, the Company has determined that it is probable a liability exists. The Company’s reasonable estimate of this liability is a range between $100 million and ERISA’s age discrimination provisions were dismissed$200 million, with no amount within that range more probable than any other amount. Therefore, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company recorded a charge of $100 million pre-tax ($61 million after-tax) in the third quarter of 2015. This amount has been classified as a long-term liability. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself in this case. In light of the uncertainties involved in this matter, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution will not differ from the amount currently accrued by the court.Company.

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries were defendants in a number of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts containing various class action allegations under federal or state wage and hour laws, including allegations concerning unpaid overtime, meal and rest breaks, and uniforms. In December 2012,Pereira v. Foot Locker, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the plaintiff alleged that the Company permitted


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

23.  Legal Proceedings  – (continued)

unpaid off-the-clock hours in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and state labor laws and sought compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Additional purported wage and hour class actions were filed against the Company that asserted claims similar to those asserted inPereira and sought similar remedies. With the exception ofHillv. Foot Locker filed in state court in Illinois,Kissinger v. Foot Locker filed in state court in California, andCortes v. Foot Locker filed in federal court in New York, all of these actions were consolidated by the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation withPereira under the captionIn re Foot Locker, Inc.Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation,(“Consolidated Cases”).

The Company and plaintiffs entered into a settlement agreement resolving the Consolidated Cases andHill that was approved by the court grantedduring the Company’s motion for summary judgment, dismissingsecond quarter of 2015. Additionally, during the action. Plaintiff has appealed to the U.S. Courtthird quarter of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. Because of the inherent uncertainties of such matters and the current status of this case,2015, the Company is currently unable to make an estimate of loss or range of loss for this case.and plaintiffs inCortesand Kissinger entered into settlement agreements that have also been approved by the respective courts.

Management does not believe that the outcome of any such legal proceedings pending against the Company or its consolidated subsidiaries, includingIn re Foot Locker, Inc. Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation,Hill, Cortes, Echeverria, Ghattas,andOsberg,as described above, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity, or results of operations, taken as a whole.

23.  Commitments

In connection with the sale of various businesseswhole, based upon current knowledge and assets, the Company maytaking into consideration current accruals. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and judgments could be obligated for certain lease commitments transferred to third parties and pursuant to certain normal representations, warranties,rendered or indemnificationssettlements entered into with the purchasers of such businesses or assets. Although the maximum potential amounts for such obligations cannot be readily determined, management believes that the resolution of such contingencies will not have a material effect oncould adversely affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, liquidity,operating results or results of operations. The Company is also operating certain stores and making rental payments for which lease agreements arecash flows in the process of being negotiated with landlords. Although there is no contractual commitment to make these payments, it is likely that a lease will be executed.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

23.  Commitments  – (continued)

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet financing (other than operating leases entered into in the normal course of business and disclosed above) or unconsolidated special purpose entities. The Company does not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including variable interest entities.particular period.

24.  Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

     
 1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q(1) Year
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales
                         
2012  1,578   1,367   1,524   1,713  $6,182 
2011  1,452   1,275   1,394   1,502  $5,623 
Gross margin(2)                         
2012  537   428   505   564  $2,034 
2011  475   388   453   480  $1,796 
Operating profit(3)                         
2012  202   93   156   159  $610 
2011  150   59   106   122  $437 
Net income                         
2012  128   59   106   104(4)(5)  $397 
2011  94   37   66   81(4)  $278 
Basic earnings per share:
                         
2012  0.84   0.39   0.70   0.69  $2.62 
2011  0.61   0.24   0.43   0.53  $1.81 
Diluted earnings per share:
                         
2012  0.83   0.39   0.69   0.68  $2.58 
2011  0.60   0.24   0.43   0.53  $1.80 
     
  1st Q 2nd Q 3rd Q(3) 4th Q(4) Year
   (in millions, except per share amounts)
Sales
                         
2015  1,916   1,695   1,794   2,007  $7,412 
2014  1,868   1,641   1,731   1,911  $7,151 
Gross margin(1)
                         
2015  670   553   607   675  $2,505 
2014  646   525   574   629  $2,374 
Operating profit(2)                         
2015  290   186   117   244  $837 
2014  254   144   187   220  $805 
Net income
                         
2015  184   119   80   158  $541 
2014  162   92   120   146  $520 
Basic earnings per share:
                         
2015  1.31   0.85   0.57   1.15  $3.89 
2014  1.12   0.63   0.84   1.03  $3.61 
Diluted earnings per share:
                         
2015  1.29   0.84   0.57   1.14  $3.84 
2014  1.10   0.63   0.82   1.01  $3.56 

(1)The fourth quarter of 2012 represents the 14 weeks ended February 2, 2013.
(2)Gross margin represents sales less cost of sales.
(3)(2)Operating profit represents income before income taxes, interest expense, net, and non-operating income.
(4)(3)During the fourth quartersthird quarter of 2012 and 2011,2015, the Company recorded impairment chargesa pre-tax charge of $7$100 million, and $5 million, respectively, related to its CCS tradename.see Note 23,Legal Proceedings for further information.
(5)(4)During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company recorded an2015 impairment charge ofcharges totaling $5 million related to CCS long-lived assets, representing a full impairment of the stores net book value as the Company has determined that all the stores will close in the first quarter of 2013.were recorded, see Note 4,Litigation, Impairment and Other Chargesfor further information.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There were no disagreements between the Company and its independent registered public accounting firm on matters of accounting principles or practices.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

(a)Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and completed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). To evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Company uses the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO“2013 COSO Framework”). Using the 2013 COSO Framework, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, evaluated the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 2, 2013.January 30, 2016. KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audits the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which is included in Item 9A(d).

(c)Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the Company’s last fiscal quarter there were no changes in internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

(d)Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting- the report appears on the following page.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and StockholdersShareholders of
Foot Locker, Inc.:

We have audited Foot Locker, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Foot Locker, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (Item 9A(b)). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Foot Locker, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, based on the criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Foot Locker, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016 and January 28, 2012,31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February 2, 2013,January 30, 2016, and our report dated April 1, 2013,March 24, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion on these consolidated financial statements.

/ss/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 1, 2013March 24, 2016


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 9B.Other Information

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

(a)Directors of the Company

Information relative to directors of the Company iswill be set forth under the section captioned “Proposal 1 — Election1-Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

(b)Executive Officers of the Company

Information with respect to executive officers of the Company iswill be set forth immediately following Item 4 in Part I.

(c)Information with respect to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 iswill be set forth under the section captioned “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
(d)Information on our audit committee and the audit committee financial expert iswill be contained in the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Committees of the Board of Directors” and is incorporated herein by reference.
(e)Information about the Code of Business Conduct governing our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and the Board of Directors, iswill be set forth under the heading “Code of Business Conduct” under the Corporate Governance Information section of the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.

Executive Compensation

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Information set forth in the Proxy Statement beginning with the section captioned “Directors“Directors’ Compensation and Benefits” through and including the section captioned “Pension Benefits” is incorporated herein by reference, and information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the heading “Compensation and Management Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the sections captioned “Equity Compensation Plan Information” and “Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s Stock” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information set forth in the Proxy Statement under the section captioned “Related Person Transactions” and under the section captioned “Directors’ Independence” is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Information about the principal accounting fees and services is set forth under the section captioned “Audit“Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Audit and Non-Audit Fees” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Information about the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures is set forth in the section captioned “Audit“Proposal 2: Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15.

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)(a)(2) Financial Statements

The list of financial statements required by this item is set forth in Item 8. “Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” All other schedules specified under Regulation S-X have been omitted because they are not applicable, because they are not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(a)(3) and (c) Exhibits

An index of the exhibits which are required by this item and which are included or incorporated herein by reference in this report appears on pages 78 through 8180.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  
 FOOT LOCKER, INC.
   By: /s/ KEN C. HICKSRICHARD A. JOHNSON  

Ken C. HicksRichard A. Johnson
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
      Date: April 1, 2013March 24, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on April 1, 2013,March 24, 2016, by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated.

 
/s/ KEN C. HICKSRICHARD A. JOHNSON    

Ken C. Hicks
Chairman of the Board,Richard A. Johnson
President, and
Chief Executive Officer, and Director
 /s/ LAUREN B. PETERS

Lauren B. Peters
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
/s/ GIOVANNA CIPRIANO

Giovanna Cipriano
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
 /s/ MATTHEW M. MCKENNANICHOLAS DIPAOLO
Matthew M. McKenna
DirectorNicholas DiPaolo
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
/s/ MAXINE CLARK

Maxine Clark
Director
 /s/ JAMES E. PRESTONMATTHEW M. MCKENNA
James E. Preston
Director
/s/ NICHOLAS DIPAOLO
Nicholas DiPaolo
Director
/s/ ALLEN QUESTROM
Allen QuestromMatthew M. McKenna
Director
/s/ ALAN D. FELDMAN

Alan D. Feldman
Director
/s/ DAVID Y. SCHWARTZ
David Y. Schwartz
Director
/s/ JAROBIN GILBERT JR.
Jarobin Gilbert Jr.
Director
 /s/ CHERYL NIDO TURPIN

Cheryl Nido Turpin
Director
/s/ JAROBIN GILBERT JR.

Jarobin Gilbert Jr.
Director
/s/ STEVEN OAKLAND

Steven Oakland
Director
/s/ GUILLERMO G. MARMOL

Guillermo G. Marmol
Director
 /s/ DONA D. YOUNG

Dona D. Young
Director

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOOT LOCKER, INC.

INDEX OF EXHIBITS REQUIRED BY ITEM 15 OF FORM 10-K
AND FURNISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 601 OF REGULATION S-K

 
Exhibit No.
in Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
 Description
3(i)(a) Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as filed by the Department of State of the State of New York on April 7, 1989 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(a) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 26, 1997 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 4, 1997 (the “July 26, 1997 Form 10-Q”)).
3(i)(b) Certificates of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as filed by the Department of State of the State of New York on (a) July 20, 1989, (b) July 24, 1990, (c) July 9, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(b) to the July 26, 1997 Form 10-Q), (d) June 11, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2(a) ofto the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-62425) (the “1998 Form S-8”)), and (e) November 1, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-74688) previously(the “2001 Form S-8”)), and (f) May 28, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2014 filed by the Registrant with the SEC)on May 28, 2014).
3(ii) By-laws of the Registrant, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 20, 2009 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on May 27, 2009).
4.1 The rights of holders of the Registrant’s equity securities are defined in the Registrant’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to (a) Exhibits 3(i)(a) and 3(i)(b) to the July 26, 1997 Form 10-Q, Exhibit 4.2(a) to the Registration Statement on1998 Form S-8, (Registration No. 333-62425) previously filed by the Registrant with the SEC, and Exhibit 4.2 to the Registration Statement on2001 Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-74688) previously filed by the Registrant with the SEC).S-8.
4.2 Indenture, dated as of October 10, 1991 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-43334) previously filed by the Registrant with the SEC)).
4.3 Form of 8-1/2% Debentures due 2022 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K dated January 16, 1992).
 10.1Foot Locker 1995 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 28, 1995 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on April 24, 1995 (the “1994 Form 10-K”)).
 10.210.1† Foot Locker 1998 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1998 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on April 21, 1998).
 10.310.2† Amendment to the Foot Locker 1998 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 29, 2000 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 7, 2000 (the “July 29, 2000 Form 10-Q”))2000).
 10.410.3† Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Registration Statement on Form 8-B filed by the Registrant with the SEC on August 7, 1989 (Registration No. 1-10299) (the “8-B Registration Statement”)).
 10.510.4† Amendment to the Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c)(i) to the 1994Annual Report on Form 10-K)10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 1995 filed on April 24, 1995).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.
in Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
Description
 10.610.5† Amendment to the Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d)(ii) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 27, 1996 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on April 26, 1996 (the “1995 Form 10-K”))1996).
 10.710.6† Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as Amended and Restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 2007 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on August 17, 2007).
 10.810.7† Amendment to the Foot Locker Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on formForm 8-K dated May 25, 2011 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on May 27, 2011).
 10.910.8†Amendment Number Two to the Foot Locker Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 26, 2014 filed on April 1, 2014 (the “March 26, 2014 Form 8-K”)).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
10.9†  Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 28, 2013 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on April 1, 2013 (the “March 28, 2013 Form 8-K”)).
 10.1010.10†  Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the March 28, 2013 Form 8-K).
10.11 Form of indemnification agreement, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(g) to the 8-B Registration Statement).
10.12 Amendment to form of indemnification agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 5, 2001 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on June 13, 2001 (the “May 5, 2001 Form 10-Q”)).
10.13Foot Locker Directors Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the July 29, 2000 Form 10-Q).
 10.14 Trust Agreement dated as of November 12, 1987 (“Trust Agreement”), between F.W. Woolworth Co. and The Bank of New York, as amended and assumed by the Registrant (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the 8-B Registration Statement).
 10.1510.14  Amendment to Trust Agreement made as of April 11, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the May 5, 2001 Form 10-Q).
 10.1610.15† Foot Locker Directors’ Retirement Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the 8-B Registration Statement).
 10.1710.16† Amendments to the Foot Locker Directors’ Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 28, 1995 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on December 11, 1995).
 10.1810.17† Employment Agreement, with Ken C. Hicks dated June 25, 2009November 6, 2014, by and between Richard A. Johnson and the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the June 26, 2009Current Report on Form 8-K)8-K dated November 3, 2014 filed on November 7, 2014).
 10.1910.18† Form of Senior Executive Employment Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.210.1 to the Registrant’s December 12, 2008Current Report on Form 8-K)8-K dated April 20, 2015 filed on April 20, 2015).
  10.2010.19†* Form of Executive Employment Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the 2008 Form 10-K).Agreement.
 10.2110.20† Foot Locker, Inc. Excess Cash Balance Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the 2008Annual Report on Form 10-K)10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 filed on March 30, 2009 (the “2008 Form 10-K”)).
 10.2210.21† Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 30, 1999 filed by the Registrant on April 30, 19991999).
10.22†From of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the March 26, 2014 Form 8-K).
10.23†Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 23, 2014 filed on December 30, 2014 (the “1998“December 23, 2014 Form 10-K”8-K”)).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.
in Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
Description
 10.2310.24† Foot Locker 2002 Directors Stock Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the 2008 Form 10-K).
 10.24Foot Locker 2003 Stock Option and Award Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 2, 2003 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on September 15, 2003).
 10.2510.25† Automobile Expense Reimbursement Program for Senior Executives (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the 2008 Form 10-K).
 10.2610.26† Executive Medical Expense Allowance Program for Senior Executives (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the 2008 Form 10-K).
 10.2710.27† Financial Planning Allowance Program for Senior Executives (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the 2008 Form 10-K).
 10.2810.28† Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 27, 2006 (the “2005 Form 10-K”)).
 10.2910.29†Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the March 26, 2014 Form 8-K).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.Description
10.30† Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement for Executive Officers (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the 2005 Form 10-K).
 10.3010.31† Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Award Agreement for Non-employeeNon-Employee Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004 Form 10-Q)filed on September 8, 2004).
 10.3110.32† Long-Term Disability Program for Senior Executives (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the 2008 Form 10-K).
 10.3210.33† Foot Locker 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of May 19, 201021, 2014 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report onDecember 23, 2014 Form 8-K dated May 19, 2010 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on May 25, 2010)8-K).
 10.3310.34  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 27, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 27, 2012 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on February 2, 2012).
 10.3410.35  Guaranty dated as of March 20, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2009 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 24, 2009).
 10.3510.36  Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated as of January 27, 2012 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 27, 2012 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on February 2, 2012).
 10.3610.37† Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 5, 2010 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on November 12, 2010).
 10.3710.38† Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the March 28, 2013 Form 8-K).
 10.3810.39† Bonus Waiver Letter for 2009 signed by Ken C. HicksForm of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.110.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report onDecember 23, 2014 Form 8-K dated March 23, 2010 filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 29, 2010)8-K).
 1212*    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.*
 2121*   Subsidiaries of the Registrant.*
 2323*   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.*
 31.131.1*  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit No.
in Item 601 of
Regulation S-K
Description
 31.231.2*  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 3232**   Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101101.INS*  Interactive Data Files *XBRL Instance Document.
 101.SCH*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
 101.CAL*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
 101.DEF*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
 101.LAB*XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
 101.PRE*  XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
*Exhibits filed with this Form 10-KFiled herewith.
**Furnished herewith.

8180