UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 20132016

OR

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _________________________.

Commission file number: 0-16084

CITIZENS & NORTHERN CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

90-92 MAIN STREET, WELLSBORO, PA 16901

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

570-724-3411

(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes¨Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes¨Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YesxNo¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YesxNo¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer “and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

(Check one:)   Large accelerated filer¨   Accelerated filerx  Non-accelerated filer¨   Smaller reporting company¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes¨   Nox

The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2013,2016, the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $232,640,563.$237,079,156.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding at February 13, 20149, 2017 was 12,409,748.

12,143,776.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for the annual meeting of its shareholders to be held April 17, 201420, 2017 are incorporated by reference into Parts III and IV of this report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Citizens & Northern Corporation (“Corporation”) is a holding company whose principal activity is community banking. The Corporation’s principal office is located in Wellsboro, Pennsylvania. The largest subsidiary is Citizens & Northern Bank (“C&N Bank” or the “Bank”). The Corporation’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries are Citizens & Northern Investment Corporation and Bucktail Life Insurance Company (“Bucktail”). Citizens & Northern Investment Corporation was formed in 1999 to engage in investment activities. Bucktail reinsures credit and mortgage life and accident and health insurance on behalf of C&N Bank.

C&N Bank is a Pennsylvania banking institution that was formed by the consolidation of Northern National Bank of Wellsboro and Citizens National Bank of Towanda on October 1, 1971. Subsequent mergers included: First National Bank of Ralston in May 1972; Sullivan County National Bank in October 1977; Farmers National Bank of Athens in January 1984; and First National Bank of East Smithfield in May 1990. In 2005, the Corporation acquired Canisteo Valley Corporation and its subsidiary, First State Bank, a New York State chartered commercial bank with offices in Canisteo and South Hornell, NY. In 2010, the First State Bank operations were merged into C&N Bank and Canisteo Valley Corporation was merged into the Corporation. On May 1, 2007, the Corporation acquired Citizens Bancorp, Inc. (“Citizens”), with banking offices in Coudersport, Emporium and Port Allegany, Pennsylvania. Citizens Trust Company, the banking subsidiary of Citizens, was merged with and into C&N Bank as part of the transaction. C&N Bank has held its current name since May 6, 1975, at which time C&N Bank changed its charter from a national bank to a Pennsylvania bank.

C&N Bank provides an extensive range of banking services, including deposit and loan products for personal and commercial customers. The Bank also maintains a trust division that provides a wide range of financial services, such as 401(k) plans, retirement planning, estate planning, estate settlements and asset management. In January 2000, C&N Bank formed a subsidiary, C&N Financial Services Corporation (“C&NFSC”). C&NFSC is a licensed insurance agency that provides insurance products to individuals and businesses. In 2001, C&NFSC added a broker-dealer division, which offers mutual funds, annuities, educational savings accounts and other investment products through registered agents. C&NFSC’s operations are not significant in relation to the total operations of the Corporation.

All phases of the Bank’s business are competitive. The Bank primarily competes in Tioga, Bradford, Sullivan, Lycoming, Potter, Cameron and McKean counties in Pennsylvania, and Steuben and Allegany counties in New York. The Bank competes with local commercial banks headquartered in our market area as well as other commercial banks with branches in our market area. Some of the banks that have branches in our market area are larger in overall size. With respect to lending activities and attracting deposits, the Bank also competes with savings banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, regulated small loan companies and credit unions. Also, the Bank competes with mutual funds for deposits. C&N Bank competes with insurance companies, investment counseling firms, mutual funds and other business firms and individuals for trust, investment management, brokerage and insurance services. The Bank is generally competitive with all financial institutions in our service area with respect to interest rates paid on time and savings deposits, service charges on deposit accounts and interest rates charged on loans. The Bank serves a diverse customer base, and is not economically dependent on any small group of customers or on any individual industry.

Major initiatives within the last 5 years included the following:

Virtually all of the Corporation’s banking offices are located in the “Marcellus Shale,” an area extending across portions of New York State, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland, West Virginia and Virginia. In recent years, most of the Pennsylvania counties in which the Corporation operates have beenwere significantly affected by an upsurge in natural gas exploration, as technological developments have made exploration of the Marcellus Shale commercially feasible. FromAfter a surge of activity in 2009 through approximately the first halfmost of 2012, a significant portion of the Corporation’s new business opportunities in lending, Trust and other services arose either directly or indirectly from Marcellus Shale-related activity. Due in large part to a decline in2011, the market price of natural gas declined, causing Marcellus Shale natural gas exploration activity slowed overto slow, though some activity has continued to occur throughout the course of 2012 and further slowed in 2013, though itCorporation’s market area. Through December 31, 2016, the Corporation has not completely stalled. Due to its pervasive nature, it is virtually impossible to quantifyexperienced significant credit issues as a result of the aggregate impact ofexpansion and subsequent reduction in Marcellus Shale-related activity on the Corporation’s financial position at December 31, 2013 and results of operations in 2009 through 2013.activity.

At December 31, 2013,2016, C&N Bank had total assets of $1,224,369,000,$1,228,026,000, total deposits of $956,981,000,$990,241,000, net loans outstanding of $635,640,000$743,362,000 and 287full-time291 full-time equivalent employees.

Most activities of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are regulated by federal or state agencies. The primary regulatory relationships are described as follows:

A copy of the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current events reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, will be furnished without charge upon written request to the Corporation’s Treasurer at P.O. Box 58, Wellsboro, PA 16901. Copies of these reports will be furnished as soon as reasonably possible, after they are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information is also available through the Corporation’s web site at www.cnbankpa.com.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The Corporation is subject to the many risks and uncertainties applicable to all banking companies, as well as risks specific to the Corporation’s geographic locations. Although the Corporation seeks to effectively manage risks, and maintains a level of equity that exceeds the banking regulatory agencies’ thresholds for being considered “well capitalized” (see Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements), management cannot predict the future and cannot eliminate the possibility of credit, operational or other losses. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from management's expectations. Some of the Corporation’s significant risks and uncertainties are discussed below.

Credit Risk from Lending Activities -A significant source of risk is the possibility that losses will be sustained because borrowers, guarantors and related parties may fail to perform in accordance with the terms of their loan agreements. Most of the Corporation’s loans are secured, but some loans are unsecured. With respect to secured loans, the collateral securing the repayment of these loans may be insufficient to cover the obligations owed under such loans. Collateral values may be adversely affected by changes in economic, environmental and other conditions, including declines in the value of real estate, changes in interest rates, changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government, wide-spread disease, terrorist activity, environmental contamination and other external events. In addition, collateral appraisals that are out of date or that do not meet industry recognized standards may create the impression that a loan is adequately collateralized when it is not. The Corporation has adopted underwriting and credit monitoring procedures and policies, including regular reviews of appraisals and borrower financial statements, that management believes are appropriate to mitigate the risk of loss. Also, as discussed further in the “Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the Corporation attempts to estimate the amount of losses that may be inherent in the portfolio through a quarterly evaluation process that includes several members of management and that addresses specifically identified problem loans, as well as other quantitative data and qualitative factors. Such risk management and accounting policies and procedures, however, may not prevent unexpected losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Act –In 2012, the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Act (the “Act”) became law. The Act was designed to strengthen the National Flood Insurance Program by phasing out the federal government’s subsidization of portions of the cost of flood insurance policies. Recent changes resulting from the Act have included: (1) phase-in of increased flood insurance rates for some properties, generally with an increase of 25% per year for 4 years until full-risk rates are reached, and (2) elimination of grandfathering of original flood-risk ratings, so that effective in 2014, all buildings will be rated using the latest flood zone maps. For primary residences that have never flooded and whose insurance policy has never lapsed, the government-funded subsidy will continue; however, the full-risk rate will apply immediately if a flood insurance policy lapses or if a property located in a flood zone is newly purchased.

Interest Rate Risk - Business risk arising from changes in interest rates is an inherent factor in operating a banking organization. The Corporation’s assets are predominantly long-term, fixed-rate loans and debt securities. Funding for these assets comes principally from shorter-term deposits and borrowed funds. Accordingly, there is an inherent risk of lower future earnings or decline in fair value of the Corporation’s financial instruments when interest rates change. Significant fluctuations in interest rates could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding interest rate risk, see Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

Breach of Information Security and Technology Dependence -The Corporation relies on software, communication, and information exchange on a variety of computing platforms and networks and over the Internet. Despite numerous safeguards, the Corporation cannot be certain that all of its systems are entirely free from vulnerability to attack or other technological difficulties or failures. The Corporation relies on the services of a variety of vendors to meet its data processing and communication needs. If information security is breached or other technology difficulties or failures occur, information may be lost or misappropriated, services and operations may be interrupted and the Corporation could be exposed to claims from customers. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Limited Geographic Diversification -The Corporation grants commercial, residential and personal loans to customers primarily in the Pennsylvania counties of Tioga, Bradford, Sullivan, Lycoming, Potter, Cameron and McKean, and in Steuben and Allegany Counties in New York State. Although the Corporation has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the local economic conditions within the region. As described in the “Business” section of Form 10-K, in recent years the Corporation’s market area has been significantly impacted by natural gas development activities associated with exploration of the Marcellus Shale. While Marcellus Shale-related development has created economic opportunities for business and individuals throughout much of our market area, natural gas exploration activity slowed in 2012 and further slowed in 2013, and the possibility exists that this activity could be further reduced or cease as a result of changes in economic conditions, environmental concerns or other factors.

Deterioration in economic conditions including possible effects if Marcellus Shale-related activity were to further diminish or cease, could adversely affect the quality of the Corporation's loan portfolio and the demand for its products and services, and accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Competition -All phases of the Corporation’s business are competitive. Some competitors are much larger in total assets and capitalization than the Corporation, have greater access to capital markets and can offer a broader array of financial services. There can be no assurance that the Corporation will be able to compete effectively in its markets. Furthermore, developments increasing the nature or level of competition could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Government Regulation and Monetary Policy -The Corporation and the banking industry are subject to extensive regulation and supervision under federal and state laws and regulations. The requirements and limitations imposed by such laws and regulations limit the manner in which the Corporation conducts its business, undertakes new investments and activities and obtains financing. These regulations are designed primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance funds and consumers and not to benefit the Corporation's shareholders. Financial institution regulation has been the subject of significant legislation in recent years and may be the subject of further significant legislation in the future, none of which is in the control of the Corporation. Significant new laws or changes in, or repeals of, existing laws could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Further, federal monetary policy, particularly as implemented through the Federal Reserve System, significantly affects short-term interest rates and credit conditions, and any unfavorable change in these conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Mortgage Banking – In September 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement to originate and sell residential mortgage loans to the secondary market through the MPF Xtra program administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago. The Corporation’s mortgage sales activity under this program was not significant in 2009, but has subsequently increased. In 2014, the Corporation entered into an agreement and in June 2014 began to originate and sell residential mortgage loans to the secondary market through the MPFX Original program, which is also administered by the Federal Home Loan Banks of Pittsburgh and Chicago. At December 31, 2013,2016, total residential mortgages sold and serviced through the two programs amounted to $145,954,000.$163,296,000. The Corporation must strictly adhere to the MPF Xtra and MPFX Original program guidelines for origination, underwriting and servicing loans, and failure to do so may result in the Corporation being forced to repurchase loans or being dropped from the program. As of December 31, 2013,2016, the total outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans the Corporation has repurchased as a result of identified instances of noncompliance amounted to $1,420,000.$1,852,000. If the volume of such forced repurchases of loans were to increase significantly, or if the Corporation were to be dropped from the program,programs, it could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Equity Securities RiskMarkets -– The fair value of the Corporation's available-for-sale securities, as well as the revenues the Corporation earns from its Trust and Financial Management and brokerage services, are sensitive to price fluctuations and market events.

Declines in the values of the Corporation’s equitysecurities holdings, combined with adverse changes in the expected cash flows from these investments, could result in other-than-temporary impairment charges.

A portion of the Corporation's securities portfolio consists of investments in stocks of banks and bank holding companies. Investments in bank stocks are subject to the risk factors affecting the banking industry, and that could cause a general market decline in the value of bank stocks. Also, losses could occur in individual stocks held by the Corporation because of specific circumstances related to each bank. These factors could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For additional information regarding equity securities risk, see Part II, Item 7A, "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."

Debt Securities Risk– In 2009, the Corporation’s earnings were materially impaired by securities losses. Much of the Corporation’s 2009 losses from trust-preferred securities and other securities stem from the much-publicized economic problems affecting the national and international economy, which particularly hurt the banking industry. The Corporation has exposure to the possibility of future losses from investments in obligations of states and political subdivisions (also known as municipal bonds). As discussed in more detail in the “Income Taxes” section of Management’s Discussion and other debt securities. Analysis, the Trump Administration and the U.S. Congress have recently been discussing the possibility of lowering corporate income tax rates. If corporate income tax rates were lowered, fully taxable-equivalent yields on tax-exempt securities (municipal bonds) would decrease from their recent levels, which may result in a reduction in the fair value of such securities held at December 31, 2016.

For additional information regarding debt securities, see the “Securities” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporation's Trust and Financial Management revenue is determined, in part, from the value of the underlying investment portfolios. Accordingly, if the values of those investment portfolios decrease, whether due to factors influencing U.S. or international securities markets, in general, or otherwise, the Corporation's revenue could be negatively impacted. In addition, the Corporation's ability to sell its brokerage services is dependent, in part, upon consumers' level of confidence in securities markets.

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh- Through its subsidiary (C&N Bank), the Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB-Pittsburgh), which is one of 1211 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Corporation has a line of credit with the FHLB-Pittsburgh that is secured by a blanket lien on its loan portfolio. Access to this line of credit is critical if a funding need arises. However, there can be no assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will be able to provide funding when needed, nor can there be assurance that the FHLB-Pittsburgh will provide funds specifically to the Corporation should its financial condition deteriorate and/or regulators prevent that access. The inability to access this source of funds could have a materially adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial flexibility if alternate financing is not available at acceptable interest rates. The failure of the FHLB-Pittsburgh or the FHLB system in general, may materially impair the Corporation’s ability to meet short- and long-term liquidity needs or to meet growth plans.

The Corporation owns common stock of the FHLB-Pittsburgh in order to qualify for membership in the FHLB system and access services from the FHLB-Pittsburgh. The FHLB-Pittsburgh faces a variety of risks in its operations including interest rate risk, counterparty credit risk, and adverse changes in its regulatory framework. In addition, the 1211 Federal Home Loan Banks are jointly liable for the consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. To the extent that one FHLB cannot meet its obligations, other FHLBs can be called upon to make required payments. Such risks affecting the FHLB-Pittsburgh could adversely impact the value of the Corporation’s investment in the common stock of the FHLB-Pittsburgh and/or affect its access to credit.

Soundness of Other Financial Institutions- In addition to the FHLB-Pittsburgh, the Corporation maintains other credit facilities that provide it with additional liquidity. These facilities include secured and unsecured borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and third-party commercial banks. The Corporation believes that it maintains a strong liquidity position and that it is well positioned to withstand foreseeable market conditions. However, legal agreements with counterparties typically include provisions allowing them to restrict or terminate the Corporation’s access to these credit facilities with or without advance notice and at their sole discretion.

Financial institutions are interconnected as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. Financial market conditions have been negatively impacted in the past and such disruptions or adverse changes in the Corporation's results of operations or financial condition could, in the future, have a negative impact on available sources of liquidity. Such a situation may arise due to circumstances that are outside the Corporation’s control, such as general market disruptions or operational problems affecting the Corporation or third parties. The Corporation’s efforts to monitor and manage liquidity risk may not be successful or sufficient to deal with dramatic or unanticipated reductions in available liquidity. In such events, the Corporation’s cost of funds may increase, thereby reducing net interest income, or the Corporation may need to sell a portion of its securities and/or loan portfolio, which, depending upon market conditions, could necessitate realizing a loss.

FDIC Insurance Assessments -In 2008 and 2009, higher levels of bank failures dramatically increased the resolution costs of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC, and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the FDIC and the U.S. Congress have taken action to increaseincreased federal deposit insurance coverage, placing additional stress on the deposit insurance fund. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, in 2009 the FDIC increased assessment rates and imposedrates. As a specialresult of lowering assessment on all insured institutions. In December 2009, we paid a pre-payment of the FDIC’s estimated assessment totallevels for the next three years, totaling approximately $5.5 million. The pre-payment amount was includedCorporation and other US banks, the Corporation’s 2016 FDIC assessment expense decreased to $488,000 from $603,000 in Other Assets in2015. Although the consolidated balance sheet, with amounts amortized in 2010 through the first six months of 2013 based on current assessments. In June 2013, as the FDIC’s funding position was strengthened in comparison to its position in 2009, the FDIC refunded the unamortized portions of the pre-payments from banks, including a refund of $2.7 million to the Corporation.

Although ourCorporation’s total expenses from FDIC assessments have steadily decreased - to $604,000 in 2013, $633,000 in 2012, $832,000 in 2011 and $1,450,000 in 2010 - from $2,092,000 in 2009, we arethe Corporation is generally unable to control the amountcost of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance.the premiums. If a significant number of bank or financial institution failures occur, wethe Corporation may be required to pay higher FDIC premiums. Future increases in FDIC insurance premiums or additional special assessments may materially adversely affect ourthe Corporation’s results of operations.

Bank Secrecy Act and Related Laws and Regulations -These laws and regulations have significant implications for all financial institutions. They increase due diligence requirements and reporting obligations for financial institutions, create new crimes and penalties, and require the federal banking agencies, in reviewing merger and other acquisition transactions, to consider the effectiveness of the parties to such transactions in combating money laundering activities. Even innocent noncompliance and inconsequential failure to follow the regulations could result in significant fines or other penalties, which could have a material adverse impact on the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Bank owns each of its properties, except for the branch facilities located at 130 Court Street, Williamsport, PA, and at 2 East Mountain Avenue, South Williamsport, PA, which are leased. In September 2011, the Athens, PA office was damaged by flooding and reopened in April 2012. The Bank did not incur a significant financial loss associated with the flooding, as almost all of the cost of replacement was covered by insurance. All of the other properties are in good condition. None of the owned properties are subject to encumbrance.

A listing of properties is as follows:

Main administrative offices:

Branch offices – Citizens & Northern Bank:

Loan production office of Citizens & Northern Bank (opening first quarter 2017):

250 East Water Street

Elmira, NY 14901

Facilities management office:

13 Water Street

Wellsboro, PA 16901

** designates leased branch facility

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Corporation and the Bank are involved in various legal proceedings incidental to their business. Management believes the aggregate liability, if any, resulting from such pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

QUARTERLY SHARE DATA

Trades of the Corporation’s stock are executed through various brokers who maintain a market in the Corporation’s stock. The Corporation’s stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market with the trading symbol CZNC. As of December 31, 2013,2016, there were 2,4652,260 shareholders of record of the Corporation’s common stock.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock during 20132016 and 2012.2015.

Future dividend payments will depend upon maintenance of a strong financial condition, future earnings and capital and regulatory requirements. Also, the Corporation and C&N Bank are subject to restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be paid without approval of banking regulatory authorities. These restrictions are described in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.

On May 19, 2011,Effective July 17, 2014, the Corporation authorizedestablished a plan for repurchasestreasury stock repurchase program authorizing repurchase of outstandingup to 622,500 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, upor approximately 5% of the Corporation’s issued and outstanding shares at July 16, 2014. As permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements and subject to market conditions and other factors, purchases under the program could be made from time to time in the open market at prevailing prices, or through privately negotiated transactions. In the first four months of 2016, the Corporation repurchased the remainder of the shares authorized under the program. In total, 622,500 shares were repurchased for a total cost of $1 million. On September 22, 2011,$12,140,000, at an average price of $19.50 per share.

Effective April 21, 2016, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized additional repurchases of outstanding common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions, up toapproved a total of $1 million, as an addition to the May 2011new treasury stock repurchase program. TheUnder the newly approved stock repurchase program, the Corporation is authorized to repurchase up to 600,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock or slightly less than 5% of the Corporation's issued and outstanding shares at April 19, 2016. Consistent with the previous program, the Board of Directors’ authorizations provideApril 21, 2016 authorization provides that: (1) the new treasury stock repurchase programs becameprogram shall be effective when publicly announced and shall continue thereafter until suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion; and (2) all shares of common stock repurchased pursuant to the programsnew program shall be held as treasury shares and be available for use and reissuance for purposes as and when determined by the Board of Directors including, without limitation, pursuant to the Corporation’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan and its equity compensation program. As of December 31, 2013, the maximum additional value available forTo date, no purchases have been made under this program was $980,694.repurchase program.

The following table sets forth a summary of purchases by the Corporation, in the open market, of its equity securities during the fourth quarter 2013, the Corporation made no purchases of its equity securities.2016:

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

Set forth below is a chart comparing the Corporation’s cumulative return to stockholders against the cumulative return of the Russell 2000 and a Peer Group Index of similar banking organizations selected by the Corporation for the five-year period commencing December 31, 20082011 and ended December 31, 2013.2016. The index values are market-weighted dividend-reinvestment numbers, which measure the total return for investing $100.00 five years ago. This meets Securities & Exchange Commission requirements for showing dividend reinvestment share performance over a five-year period and measures the return to an investor for placing $100.00 into a group of bank stocks and reinvesting any and all dividends into the purchase of more of the same stock for which dividends were paid.

The Corporation’s peer group consists of all publicly traded (who file financial statements with the Securities & Exchange Commission) commercial banks headquartered inand thrifts within New Jersey, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania with total assets of $700between $750 million to $2and $3.5 billion as of September 30, 2013. This peer group consists of ACNB Corporation, Gettysburg; AmeriServ Financial, Inc., Johnstown; Citizens Financial Services, Inc., Mansfield; CNB Financial Corporation, Clearfield; Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc., York; ENB Financial Corp., Ephrata; ESB Financial Corporation, Ellwood; ESSA Bancorp, Inc., Stroudsburg; First Keystone Corporation, Berwick; First National Community Bancorp, Inc., Dunmore; FNB Bancorp, Inc., Newtown; Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc., Hatboro; Franklin Financial Services Corporation, Chambersburg; Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation, Harleysville; Integrity Bancshares, Inc., Camp Hill; Norwood Financial Corp., Honesdale; Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Shippensburg; Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc., Williamsport; Peoples Financial Services Corp., Scranton; QNB Corp., Quakertown; Republic First Bancorp, Inc., Philadelphia; Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc., Narberth; Somerset Trust Holding Company, Somerset; TF Financial Corporation, Newtown.2016.

The data for this graph was obtained from SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the Stock Incentive Plan and Independent Directors Stock Incentive Plan, both of which have been approved by the Corporation’s shareholders. The figures shown in the table below are as of December 31, 2013.2016.

More details related to the Corporation’s equity compensation plans are provided in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements.

NM = Not a meaningful ratio.ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)

(1) Rates of return on tax-exempt securities and loans are calculated on a fully-taxable equivalent basis.

(2) The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing: (a) total noninterest expense excluding losses from prepayment of debt, by (b) the sum of net interest income (including income from tax-exempt securities and loans on a fully-taxable equivalent basis) and noninterest income excluding securities gains or losses.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements in this section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Citizens & Northern Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Corporation) intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts, are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, business objectives and expectations, and are generally identifiable by the use of words such as, "should", “likely”, "expect", “plan”, "anticipate", “target”, “forecast”, and “goal”. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, may be beyond management’s control and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors which could have a material, adverse impact on the operations and future prospects of the Corporation include, but are not limited to, the following:

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

EARNINGS OVERVIEW

In 2013,2016, net income totaled $18,594,000,$15,762,000, or $1.51$1.30 per common share - basic and $1.50 per share – diluted, as compared to $1.86$1.35 per share – basic and $1.85diluted in 2015 and $1.38 per share – diluted in 2012 and $1.92 per- basic and diluted share in 2011.2014. The results for 20132016 represented a return on average assets of 1.50%1.28% and a return on average equity of 10.25%8.37%.

20132016 vs. 20122015

Net income per share – diluted for 2013 of $18,594,0002016 was $4,111,000 (18.1%)3.7% lower than 2012 net income.in 2015. Some of the more significant highlights related to annual earnings in 2016 as compared to 2015 are as follows:

2015 vs. 2014

Basic and diluted net income of $1.35 per share for 2015 was 2.2% lower than in 2014. Some of the more significant highlights related to annual earnings in 2015 as compared to 2014 are as follows:

2012 vs. 2011

In 2012, net income of $22,705,000 was $663,000 (2.8%) lower than 2011 net income. Some of the more significant highlights are as follows:

More detailed information concerning fluctuations in the Corporation’s earnings results are provided in other sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect many of the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates

A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change is the determination of the allowance for loan losses. The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s estimate of the losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and recorded as a reduction of the investment in loans. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate and reasonable. Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements provide an overview of the process management uses for evaluating and determining the allowance for loan losses, and additional discussion of the allowance for loan losses is provided in a separate section later in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Given the very subjective nature of identifying and valuing loan losses, it is likely that well-informed individuals could make materially different assumptions, and could, therefore calculate a materially different allowance value. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, changes in economic conditions may necessitate revisions in future years. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

Another material estimate is the calculation of fair values of the Corporation’s debt securities. For most of the Corporation’s debt securities, the Corporation receives estimated fair values of debt securities from an independent valuation service, or from brokers. In developing fair values, the valuation service and the brokers use estimates of cash flows, based on historical performance of similar instruments in similar interest rate environments. Based on experience, management is aware that estimated fair values of debt securities tend to vary among brokers and other valuation services.

As described in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). In making that evaluation, consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) whether the Corporation intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. Management’s assessments of the likelihood and potential for recovery in value of securities are subjective and based on sensitive assumptions.

NET INTEREST INCOME

The Corporation’s primary source of operating income is net interest income, which is equal to the difference between the amounts of interest income and interest expense. Tables I, II and III include information regarding the Corporation’s net interest income in 2013, 2012,2016, 2015, and 2011.2014. In each of these tables, the amounts of interest income earned on tax-exempt securities and loans have been adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Accordingly, the net interest income amounts reflected in these tables exceed the amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements. The discussion that follows is based on amounts in the tables.

In 2009The calculations of fully taxable-equivalent yields on tax-exempt loans and the first quarter 2010, the Corporation recorded OTTI on its holding of a trust preferred security issued by Carolina First Mortgage Loan Trust, a subsidiary of The South Financial Group, Inc. In the fourth quarter 2010, The Toronto-Dominion Bank acquired The South Financial Group, Inc., made a payment for the full amount of previously deferred interest, and resumed quarterly payments on the security. The Corporation recognized a material changesecurities in the expected cash flows and recorded accretion income (included in interest income) to offset the previous OTTI charges as an adjustment to the security’s yield over its remaining life. Accretion income from this security totaled $855,000 in 2012 and $825,000 in 2011. The security had a face amount of $2,000,000 and matured in May 2012.

Excluding interest income (including accretion) and the average balance of this security from the calculations used to determine Tables I, II and III reflect inherent tax benefit based on the interestCorporation’s marginal federal income tax rate spreadof 35% for all periods presented. As discussed in more detail in the “Income Taxes” section of Management’s Discussion and interest margin (fully taxable equivalent net interestAnalysis, the Trump Administration and the U.S. Congress have recently been discussing the possibility of lowering corporate income divided by average total earning assets)tax rates. If corporate income tax rates were lowered, fully taxable-equivalent yields on tax-exempt loans and securities held at December 31, 2016 would be as follows:decrease from their recent levels.

20132016 vs. 20122015

Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was $46,384,000$43,157,000 in 2013, $4,657,000 (9.1%2016, which was $338,000 (0.8%) lowerhigher than in 2012.2015. As shown in Table III, in 20132016 compared to 2012,2015, net changes in volume had the effect of increasing net interest income $2,754,000, and interest rate changes had the effect of decreasing net interest income $3,743,000, and net changes in volume had the effect of decreasing net interest income $914,000.$2,416,000. The most significant components of the ratevolume-related increase in net interest income in 2016 was an increase in interest income of $3,255,000 attributable to an increase in the balance of loans receivable and a decrease in interest expense of $991,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of borrowed funds, partially offset by a volume-related decrease in interest income on available-for-securities of $1,542,000. The most significant components of the rate-related change in net interest income in 20132016 were a decrease in interest income of $2,615,000$1,560,000 attributable to lower rates earned on loans receivable and a decrease of $758,000 in interest income of $2,554,000 attributable to lower rates earned on available-for-sale securities, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense of $1,413,000 due to lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. The most significant components of the volume change in net interest income in 2013 were a decrease in interest income of $2,588,000 attributable to a decline in the balance of loans receivable, a decrease in interest expense of $1,180,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of borrowed funds, and a decrease in interest expense of $691,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of interest-bearing deposits (primarily certificates of deposit).securities. As presented in Table II, the “Interest Rate Spread” (excess of average rate of return on earning assets over average cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.88%3.63% in 2013,2016 as compared to 4.04%3.54% in 2012.2015.

INTEREST INCOME AND EARNING ASSETS

Interest income totaled $52,149,000$46,850,000 in 2013,2016, a decrease of 13.2%1.2% from 2012.2015. Although yields on securities and loans fell, overall yield on earning assets dropped only 0.01% due to a change in mix of earning assets to increase loans and decrease securities. Interest and fees on loans receivable increased $1,695,000, or 5.0%, while interest on available-for-sale securities decreased $5,203,000,$2,300,000, or 12.2%17.1%. The average balance of gross loans receivable increased 9.9% to $723,076,000 in 2016 from $657,727,000 in 2015. The Corporation experienced significant growth in all loan categories, particularly in participation loans purchased of $19,664,000, residential mortgages of $16,405,000, commercial real estate loans of $13,452,000, and tax free municipal loans of $6,351,000. The Corporation’s average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 4.92% in 2016 from 5.15% in 2015 as average interest rates on new loans are lower, reflecting recent market conditions.

As indicated in Table II, average available-for-sale securities (at amortized cost) totaled $461,564,000$404,979,000 in 2013,2016, a decrease of $2,785,000 (0.6%$74,169,000 (15.5%) from 2012. Net contraction2015. Funds generated from the net decrease in the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio was primarily made up of U.S. Government agency mortgage-backed securities and trust preferred securities. This contraction was partially offset by increaseswere used, in part, to fund the balances of U.S. Government agency bonds, municipal securities, and U.S. Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations.loan growth described above. The Corporation’s yield on securities fellwas lower in 2012 and 2013 because of low market interest rates,2016 than in 2015, primarily due to higher-yielding securities maturing as the maturity of the Carolina First security noted above, calls on municipal bonds and trust preferred securities, and prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.portfolio size was reduced. The average rate of return on available-for-sale securities was 3.12% for 20132.75% in 2016 and 3.67%2.81% in 2012.

The average balance of gross loans receivable decreased 6.2% to $656,495,000 in 2013 from $700,241,000 in 2012. The Corporation experienced contraction in the balance of loans receivable due to borrowers prepaying or refinancing existing loans combined with modest demand for new loans. The decline in the balance of the residential mortgage portfolio was also affected by management’s decision to sell a significant portion of newly originated residential mortgages on the secondary market. The Corporation’s average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 5.73% in 2013 from 6.11% in 2012.2015.

The average balance of interest-bearing due from banks decreased to $26,159,000$19,022,000 in 20132016 from $32,337,000$22,201,000 in 2012.2015. This has consisted primarily of balances held by the Federal Reserve and also includes other overnight deposits and FDIC-insured certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions.

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

Interest expense fell $3,266,000,$909,000, or 36.2%19.8%, to $5,765,000$3,693,000 in 20132016 from $9,031,000$4,602,000 in 2012.2015. Table II shows that the overall cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.67%0.45% in 20132016 from 0.97%0.55% in 2012.2015.

Total average deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing) increased slightly (0.2%) to $970,447,000 in 2016 from $968,201,000 in 2015. Decreases in the average balances of certificates of deposit and Individual Retirement Accounts were offset by increases in average balances of interest checking, money market accounts, savings accounts and noninterest-bearing demand deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased slightly to 0.28% in 2016 from 0.26% in 2015.

Total average borrowed funds decreased 4.4%$15,126,000 to $62,516,000 in 2016 from $77,642,000 in 2015. The average rate on borrowed funds was 2.57% in 2016 compared to 3.45% in 2015, reflecting a $27,604,000 reduction in the average balance of higher-rate, long-term borrowings resulting from prepayment in the second and fourth quarters of 2015 of a long-term repurchase agreement borrowing with an interest rate of 4.265%. The average balance of short-term borrowings increased $12,478,000 in 2016 over 2015, as average overnight borrowings were higher in 2016 and the Corporation funded the pay-off of the long-term repurchase agreement with a series of short-term advances from the FHLB-Pittsburgh that matured over the course of 2016.

2015 vs. 2014

Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was $42,819,000 in 2015, which was $1,074,000 (2.4%) lower than in 2014. As shown in Table III, in 2015 compared to 2014, interest rate changes had the effect of decreasing net interest income $2,283,000, and net changes in volume had the effect of increasing net interest income $1,209,000. The most significant components of the rate-related change in net interest income in 2015 were a decrease in interest income of $1,957,000 attributable to lower rates earned on loans receivable and a decrease of $468,000 in interest income on available-for-sale securities. The most significant components of the volume-related increase in net interest income in 2015 was an increase in interest income of $1,544,000 attributable to an increase in the balance of loans receivable, a decrease in interest expense of $270,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of borrowed funds, and a decrease in interest expense of $117,000 attributable to a reduction in the balance of interest-bearing deposits (primarily certificates of deposit), partially offset by a volume-related decrease in interest income on available-for-securities of $681,000. As presented in Table II, the “Interest Rate Spread” (excess of average rate of return on earning assets over average cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities) was 3.54% in 2015 as compared to 3.63% in 2014.

INTEREST INCOME AND EARNING ASSETS

Interest income totaled $47,421,000 in 2015, a decrease of 3.2% from 2014. Interest and fees on loans receivable decreased $413,000, or 1.2%. As indicated in Table II, average available-for-sale securities (at amortized cost) totaled $479,148,000 in 2015, a decrease of $15,786,000 (3.2%) from 2014. The net decrease in the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio consisted of decreases in tax-exempt municipal securities, U.S. Government mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency bonds, and equity securities. These decreases were partially offset by increases in the balances of collateralized mortgage obligations and taxable municipal securities. The Corporation’s yield on securities was lower in 2015 than in 2014, primarily because of low market interest rates on new investments combined with higher-yielding securities maturing. The average rate of return on available-for-sale securities was 2.81% for 2015 and 2.95% in 2014.

The average balance of gross loans receivable increased 4.8% to $657,727,000 in 2015 from $627,753,000 in 2014. The Corporation experienced growth in the balances of tax free municipal loans, residential mortgages and participation loans purchased. These increases were partially offset by decreases in balances of commercial real estate loans. The Corporation’s average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 5.15% in 2015 from 5.46% in 2014.

The average balance of interest-bearing due from banks decreased to $22,201,000 in 2015 from $32,510,000 in 2014. This has consisted primarily of balances held by the Federal Reserve and also includes other overnight deposits and FDIC-insured certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions.

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

Interest expense fell $520,000, or 10.2%, to $964,031,000$4,602,000 in 20132015 from $1,008,469,000$5,122,000 in 2012.2014. Table II shows that the overall cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.55% in 2015 from 0.61% in 2014.

Total average deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing) increased 0.3%, to $968,201,000 in 2015 from $965,418,000 in 2014. Decreases in the average balances of certificates of deposit, Individual Retirement Accounts, and money market accounts were partially offset by increases in average balances of interest checking, savings accounts and savings accounts. Consistent with continuing low short-term market interest rates, thenon-interest bearing demand deposits. The average rates incurredrate paid on certificates of deposit and Individual Retirement Accounts have decreased significantlyinterest-bearing deposits fell slightly to 0.26% in 2013 as compared to 2012.2015 from 0.28% in 2014.

Total average borrowed funds decreased $29,723,000$2,298,000 to $82,328,000$77,642,000 in 20132015 from $112,051,000$79,940,000 in 2012. During 2012 and 2013, the Corporation has paid off long-term borrowings as they matured using the cash flow received from loans and investment securities. In 2012, the Corporation prepaid principal totaling $17,000,000 on long-term borrowings (repurchase agreements); the Corporation incurred losses from the prepayments totaling $2,333,000. In March 2013, the Corporation prepaid principal of $7,000,000 on a long-term borrowing (repurchase agreement) with a rate of 3.60%; the Corporation incurred a loss from the prepayment totaling $1,023,000, which is reported in Other Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Management expects that the prepayments will have a favorable effect on the net interest margin in the future. After the effect of the prepayments, the remaining balance of long-term borrowings under repurchase agreements was $61,000,000 at December 31, 2013.2014. The average rate on borrowed funds was 3.72%3.45% in 2013,2015 compared to 3.77%3.70% in 2012.

2012 vs. 2011

Fully taxable equivalent net interest income was $51,041,000 in 2012, $86,000 (0.2%) higher than in 2011. As shown in Table III, net changes in volume had the effect of increasing net interest income $961,000 in 2012 compared to 2011, and interest rate changes had the effect of decreasing net interest income $875,000. The most significant components of the volume change in net interest income in 2012 were2014, reflecting a decrease in interest expense of $1,203,000 attributable to a$6,982,000 reduction in the average balance of borrowed funds,higher-rate, long-term borrowings resulting from pre-payment of a decreaselong-term repurchase agreement borrowing with an interest rate of 4.265%. The Corporation paid off $10 million of principal on this borrowing in interest expenseMay 2015, and $24 million in December 2015, leaving no remaining balance outstanding at December 31, 2015. (The pre-payment of $411,000 attributable to a reductionlong-term borrowings is described in the balance of interest-bearing deposits (primarily certificates of deposit and Individual Retirement Accounts), and a decrease in interest income of $887,000 attributable to a decline in the balance of loans receivable. The most significant components of the rate change in net interest income in 2012 were a decrease in interest expense of $2,894,000 due to lower rates paid on interest-bearing deposits, a decrease in interest income of $2,072,000 attributable to lower rates earned on available-for-sale securities and a decrease in interest income of $1,733,000 attributable to lower rates earned on loans receivable. As presented in Table II, the “Interest Rate Spread” (excess of average rate of return on earning assets over average cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities) was 4.04% in 2012, as compared to 3.96% in 2011.

INTEREST INCOME AND EARNING ASSETS

Interest income totaled $60,072,000 in 2012, a decrease of 6.9% from 2011. Interest and fees on loans receivable decreased $2,620,000, or 5.8% while income from available-for-sale securities decreased $1,914,000, or 10.1%. As indicated in Table II, average available-for-sale securities (at amortized cost) totaled $464,349,000 in 2012, an increase of $2,445,000 (0.5%Earnings Overview section.) from 2011. Net growth in the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities portfolio was primarily made up of U.S. Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations and municipal securities. This growth was partially offset by reductions in the balances of mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government agency bonds, and trust preferred securities. The Corporation’s yield on taxable securities fell in 2011 and 2012 because of rapid prepayments on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations as well as low market interest rates. The average rate of return on available-for-sale securities was 3.67% for 2012 and 4.11% in 2011.

The average balance of gross loans receivable decreased 2.0% to $700,241,000short-term borrowings increased $4,684,000 in 2012 from $714,421,0002015 over 2014, as average overnight borrowings were higher in 2011. The2015 and the Corporation experienced contraction infunded the balance of loans receivable due to borrowers prepaying or refinancing existing loans combined with modest demand for new loans. The decline in the balancepay-off of the residential mortgage portfolio was also affected by management’s decision to selllong-term repurchase agreement in December 2015 with funds from a significant portionseries of newly originated residential mortgages onshort-term advances from the secondary market. The Corporation’sFHLB-Pittsburgh totaling $25,072,000 at an average rate of return on loans receivable declined to 6.11% in 2012 from 6.36% in 2011.0.86%.

TABLE I - ANALYSIS OF INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE

INTEREST EXPENSE AND INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

Interest expense fell $4,525,000, or 33.4%, to $9,031,000 in 2012 from $13,556,000 in 2011. Table II shows that the overall cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities fell to 0.97% in 2012 from 1.38% in 2011.

Total average deposits (interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing) increased 0.7%, to $1,008,469,000 in 2012 from $1,001,125,000 in 2011. Increases in the average balances of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts were partially offset by decreases in Individual Retirement Accounts and certificates of deposit. Consistent with continuing low short-term market interest rates, the average rates incurred on deposit accounts decreased significantly in 2012 as compared to 2011.

Variable-rate accounts made up $130,833,000 of the average balance in Individual Retirement Accounts in 2012 and $144,008,000 in 2011. Prior to May 2011, substantially all of these accounts were paid interest at a rate that could change quarterly at management’s discretion with a contractual floor of 3.00%. Effective in May 2011, the rate floor was removed; following this change, the rate paid on these accounts was lowered several times. As shown in Table II, the average rate on Individual Retirement Accounts decreased to 0.80% in 2012 from 2.04% in 2011.

Total average borrowed funds decreased $40,059,000 to $112,051,000 in 2012 from $152,110,000 in 2011. During 2011 and 2012, the Corporation paid off long-term borrowings as they matured using the cash flow received from loans and investment securities. In May and September 2012, the Corporation prepaid principal totaling $17,000,000 on long-term borrowings (repurchase agreements); the Corporation incurred losses from the prepayments totaling $2,333,000. The average rate on borrowed funds was 3.77% in 2012, compared to 3.58% in 2011.

The average balance of “RepoSweep” arrangements, which are used by the Corporation to borrow funds from commercial banking customers on an overnight basis and included within short-term borrowings, declined to $4,454,000 in 2012 from $17,216,000 in 2011 primarily as a result of changes to service charges assessed on related business checking accounts. During 2012, the Corporation took several short-term and overnight advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB-Pittsburgh) to offset seasonal declines in deposit balances and meet other liquidity needs. Short-term and overnight advances averaged $2,377,000 in 2012 with no such advances outstanding during 2011.

TABLE II - ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE DAILY BALANCES AND RATES

(Dollars in Thousands)

TABLE III - ANALYSIS OF VOLUME AND RATE CHANGES

(In Thousands)