Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FORM 10-K

xAnnual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172023

or

or

¨TransitionalTransition Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 001-36338

22nd Century Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada
98-0468420

Nevada

98-0468420

(State or other jurisdiction

(IRS Employer

of incorporation)

Identification No.)

8560 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221321 Farmington Road, Mocksville, North Carolina27028

(Address of principal executive offices)

(716) (716) 270-1523

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

9530 Main Street, Clarence, New York 14031

(Former name, former address
and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report)

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.00001 par value

NYSE American

XXII

NASDAQ Capital Market

Securities registered underpursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes¨ Nox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)

Yesx No¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ¨

Accelerated Filerx

Non-Accelerated Filer ¨

Smaller Reporting Company ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company ¨Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes No

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes¨ Nox

AsThe aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock as of June 30, 2017,2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate value of the registrant’s common stock (excludingwas approximately 6.5$84 million shares held by affiliates), based upon the $1.75closing price at whichreported for such common stock was last solddate on June 30, 2017, was approximately $158.4 million.  

As ofthe Nasdaq Capital Market. On March 6, 2018, there were 124,136,08725, 2024, the registrant had 55,722,442 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant'sregistrant’s Proxy Statement for its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2017.2023.

Table of Contents

22nd Century Group, Inc.

Table of Contents

 

PART I

Item 1.PART I

Business.

4

5

Item 1A.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors.Factor Summary

18

3

Item 1.

Business

5

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

17

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.Comments

31

32

Item 2.1C.

Properties.Cybersecurity

31

33

Item 3.2.

Legal Proceedings.Properties

31

34

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

34

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

33

34

PART II

34

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.Securities

33

34

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.[Reserved]

36

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations

37

36

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk.Risk

51

50

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Data

51

50

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Disclosure

51

50

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures.Procedures

51

Item 9B.

Other Information.Information

54

51

PART IIIItem 9C.

Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections

51

PART III

52

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Governance

54

52

Item 11.

Executive Compensation.Compensation

55

52

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Matters

55

52

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.Independence

55

52

Item 14.

Principal AccountingAccountant Fees and Services

55

52

PART IV

53

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.Schedules

53

55Item 16

Form 10-K Summary

57

SIGNATURES

58

2

2

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

and Risk Factor Summary

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning our business, operations and financial performance and condition as well as our plans, objectives and expectations for our business operations and financial performance and condition that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements by words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “could,” “due,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “positioned,” “predict,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would” and other similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and future trends. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our business and the industry in which we operate and our management'smanagement’s beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance or development and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are in some cases beyond our control. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected, including:

including the following summary of risks related to our business:

·Our abilityWe have had a history of losses and negative cash flows, and we may be unable to achieve and sustain profitability and positive cash flows;flows from operations.

·Our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to regain compliance with the NASDAQ listing requirements.
Our competitors generally have, and any future competitors may have, greater financial resources and name recognition than we do, and they may therefore develop products or other technologies similar or superior to ours, or otherwise compete more successfully than we do.
Our research and development process may not develop marketable products, which would result in loss of our investment into such process.
The timingfailure of our information systems to function as intended or their penetration by outside parties with the implementationintent to corrupt them could result in business disruption, litigation and regulatory action, and loss of revenue, assets, or personal or confidential data (cybersecurity).
We may be unsuccessful at commercializing our Very Low Nicotine “VLN” tobacco using the reduced exposure claims authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) with respect.
The manufacturing of tobacco products subjects us to regulations that will require all cigarettes sold insignificant governmental regulation and the United States to contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine;

·Our ability to obtain FDA clearance to market ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes as a Modified Risk Tobacco Product;

·Our ability to obtain significant revenue from the licensing of our technology and/or our sale or licensing of our Very Low Nicotine tobacco and/or product;

·Our ability to manage our growth effectively;

·Our ability to retain key personnel;

·Our ability to enter into additional licensing transactions;

·Our ability to gain market acceptance for our products;

·Any potential negative impact from doing business in the legal hemp and medical cannabinoid space;

·The strict enforcement of federal laws regarding state-legal cannabis/marijuana;

·Our abilityfailure to comply with government regulations;such regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and subject us to substantial fines or other regulatory actions.

·Our abilityWe may become subject to compete with competitors that may have greater resources than we have;

·The potential for our competitorslitigation related to develop products that are less expensive, safer cigarette smoking and/or more effective than ours;

·The potential exposure to productenvironmental tobacco smoke, or ETS, which could severely impair our results of operations and liquidity.
The loss of a significant customer for whom we manufacture tobacco products could have an adverse impact on our results of operation.
Product liability claims, product recalls, andor other claims; andclaims could cause us to incur losses or damage our reputation.

·The FDA could force the removal of our products from the U.S. market.

3

Our ability toCertain of our proprietary rights have expired or may expire or may not otherwise adequately protect our intellectual property, products and potential products, and if we cannot obtain adequate protection of our intellectual property, products and potential products, we may not be able to avoid infringement on rights of third parties.successfully market our products and potential products.

We license certain patent rights from third-party owners. If such owners do not properly maintain or enforce the patents underlying such licenses, our competitive position and business prospects could be harmed.
Our stock price may be highly volatile and could decline in value.
We are a named defendant in certain litigation matters, including federal securities class action lawsuits and derivative complaints; if we are unable to resolve these matters favorably, then our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Future sales of our common stock will result in dilution to our common stockholders.
We do not expect to declare any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

For the discussion of these risks and uncertainties and others that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking statements, please refer to “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company” “we” “us” and “our” refer to 22nd Century Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

3

4

PART I

Item 1.Business.

Item 1.Business.

Overview

Background

22nd Century Group, Inc. was incorporated underis a tobacco products company with sales and distribution of our own proprietary new reduced nicotine tobacco products authorized as Modified Risk Tobacco Products by the laws of the State of Nevada on September 12, 2005 under the name Touchstone Mining Limited. On January 25, 2011,FDA. Additionally, we entered into a reverse merger transaction with 22nd Century Limited, LLC, which we refer to herein as the “merger.” Upon the closing of the merger, 22nd Century Limited, LLC became our wholly-owned subsidiary. After the merger, we succeeded to the business of 22nd Century Limited, LLC as our sole line of business.provide contract manufacturing services for conventional combustible tobacco products for third-party brands.

22nd Century Limited, LLC was originally formed as a New York limited liability company on February 20, 1998 as 21st Century Limited, LLC and subsequently merged with a newly-formed Delaware limited liability company, 22nd Century Limited, LLC, on November 29, 1999. Since inception, 22nd Century Limited, LLC has sponsored research and subsequently used biotechnology to regulate the nicotine content in tobacco plants.

Overview

We are a plant biotechnology company focused on technology that allows us to increase or decrease the level of nicotine and other nicotinic alkaloids in tobacco plants and the levels of cannabinoids in hemp/cannabis plants through genetic engineering and plant breeding. Our primary mission in tobacco is dedicated to reducemitigating the harm causedharms of smoking through our proprietary reduced nicotine content (“RNC”) tobacco plants and our Very Low Nicotine, VLN® combustible cigarette products. In December 2021, we secured the first and only authorization from the FDA to market a combustible cigarette, our brand VLN® as a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (“MRTP”) using certain reduced nicotine exposure claims. In April 2022, the inaugural launch of our proprietary VLN® cigarettes commenced through a pilot program in select Circle K stores in and around Chicago, Illinois. Building on the success of the pilot, we initiated a phased rollout strategy in 2023, progressing state by smoking.state and region by region to a store footprint spanning more than 5,000 stores in 26 states. Our primary mission in hemp/cannabis is to develop proprietary hemp strains for potential important new medicines and agricultural crops. We have an extensiveVLN® tobacco products are supported by a substantial intellectual property portfolio ofcomprising issued patents and patent applications relatingrelated to tobacco plants, and in particular our reduced nicotine tobacco plants.

In addition to continued focus on VLN®, we renewed our focus on utilizing our tobacco assets to attract additional tobacco business to help fund the growth of VLN®. In addition to existing business relationships with multiple tobacco products companies, we will continue to expand the number of brands in our contract manufacturing operations (“CMO”) portfolio in 2024.

GVB Divestiture

On December 22, 2023, we completed the sale of substantially all of the GVB hemp/cannabis business (referred to as the “GVB Divestiture”). As a result, we have classified the results of operations of the hemp/cannabis segment and disposal group as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. Additionally, the associated assets and liabilities linked to the tobaccodiscontinued operations have been designated as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. All results and information presented exclude the hemp/cannabis plants.segment and disposal group unless otherwise noted. For more detailed information regarding the divestiture, please refer to Note 2, titled “Discontinued Operations and Divestiture,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which can be found in Item 15 of this report.

Tobacco Overview

In

Our unwavering commitment is centered around reducing the effects of nicotine from smoking and smoking cessation. We believe we can achieve this mission through the commercialization of our proprietary RNC tobacco we have developed uniqueplants and proprietary Very Low Nicotine (“VLN”) tobacco that grows withcigarette products, prominently featured in our VLN® brand. These products contain 95% less nicotine thancontent compared to conventional tobacco used in conventional cigarettes. Since 2011, we have provided more than 24 million researchand cigarettes, containingwhich are intended to help users smoke less. The urgency of our proprietary tobaccos for use in numerous independent clinical studies at many well-known study locations, with agencies of the United States federal government investing more than $100 million in such independent clinical studies. The results of these independent clinical studies have been published in peer-reviewed publications and demonstrate that our VLN tobacco has been associated with reductions in smoking, nicotine exposure, and nicotine dependence, with minimal evidence of nicotine withdrawal, compensatory smoking, or serious adverse events. The results of numerous completed and on-going clinical studies provide independent scientific support for the public announcement on July 28, 2017mission is underscored by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) thatalarming statistics – the FDA plans to mandate that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States will be required to contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine. Since our proprietary VLN tobacco has been the subject of numerous completed and on-going, independent clinical studies paid for by agencies of the federal government, we are investigating the potential use of our VLN tobacco in our own products that will be intended to comply with the new FDA regulations, as well as we are investigating the potential license of the use of our VLN tobacco by third-parties. We are also investigating potential opportunities relating to our VLN tobacco outside of the United States.

In hemp, we are developing proprietary hemp strains for potential important new medicines and agricultural crops. Our current activities involve only work with legal hemp in full compliance with federal and state laws. The hemp plant and the cannabis/marijuana plant are both part of the samecannabis sativa genus/species of plant, except that hemp has less than 0.3% dry weight content of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”) and is legal under federal and state laws. The same plant, with a higher THC content, is cannabis/marijuana, which is legal under certain state laws, but which is not legal under federal law. The similarities between these plants can cause confusion. Our activities with fully legal hemp have sometimes been incorrectly perceived as us being involved in federally illegal cannabis/marijuana. This is not the case. We work only with legal hemp in full compliance with federal and state laws. We have developed hemp plants with zero (-0-) amounts of THC (“ZERO-THC”). We believe that our ZERO-THC hemp plants are a potential solution to one of the biggest challenges facing the legal hemp industry because, currently, hemp crops that grow with THC levels above the legal limit of 0.3% THC are required to be destroyed and hemp farmers cannot obtain crop insurance to protect against this risk. However, our ZERO-THC plants can be a potential solution to this risk since our ZERO-THC hemp plants will not develop THC above the legal limits for hemp. In the United States, we are working with the University of Virginia (“UVA”) to (i) create unique industrial hemp plants with guaranteed levels of THC below the legal limits that define hemp for optimal growth in Virginia (thus eliminating the risk to growers of having to destroy non-conforming hemp crops), (ii) optimize other desirable hemp plant characteristics to improve the plant’s suitability for growing in Virginia and in similar legacy tobacco regions of the United States, (iii) utilize high-value medical cannabinoid hemp varieties and specialized cannabinoid extraction processes for use in human theraputics, and (iv) use our unique hemp plants for phytoremediation to clean up and reclaim polluted soils. We have also obtained a license in the State of New York to research and grow hemp in response to the numerous public announcements by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo that New York State intends to become a leading grower and producer of hemp and hemp-derived products. In Canada, we conduct sponsored research on the hemp plant with Anandia Laboratories in Vancouver, British Columbia, in full compliance with Canadian regulations.

4

We currently are primarily involved in the following activities:

·Facilitating the timely implementation of the plan by the FDA to require that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine;

·

Continuing to work on a Modified Risk Tobacco Product application to be resubmitted to the FDA to obtain a reduced exposure marketing authorization for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes to be marketed in the United States as “less addictive” and/or containing 95% less nicotine than conventional tobacco cigarettes;

·Seeking multiple, substantial licensing agreements for our tobacco technology and/or our proprietary tobaccos;

·Continuing to produceSPECTRUM® research cigarettes for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (“NIDA”), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), for use in independent clinical studies;

·Continuing to research and develop other novel tobacco plant varieties;

·

Continuing to explore opportunities outside of the United States for the use of our Very Low Nicotine tobacco in potential over-the-counter cigarettes, such asBRAND A, or in a potential prescription-based, smoking cessation aid, such asX-22, in foreign countries that may desire such products;

·Continuing to expand our legal hemp activities and development of unique plant varieties of hemp, including (i) hemp plants with other desirable agronomic traits in addition to low to no amounts of THC for the legal hemp industry, and (ii) hemp plants with high levels of cannabidiol (“CBD”) and other non-THC cannabinoids for the legal medical cannabinoid markets;

·Continuing to explore opportunities outside of the United States for the sale of our branded proprietary tobacco products, includingBRAND B, RED SUN,andMAGICcigarettes; and

·Continuing to grow our contract manufacturing business for third-party branded tobacco products.

Our future prospects depend on our ability to generate and sustain revenues from (i) licensing and/or sale of our proprietary tobacco, technology and/or products; (ii) regulatory approval by the FDA of our Modified Risk Tobacco Product application for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes, (iii) the manufacture of filtered cigar and cigarette brands of third-parties at our manufacturing facility in North Carolina; and (iv) our expanding activities in the legal hemp industry. Our ability to generate meaningful revenue from our proprietary tobacco, technology, and products in the United States depends on: (i) the implementation by the FDA of regulations that require all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States to contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine, (ii) obtaining FDA authorization to market our potential Modified Risk Tobacco Product,BRAND A, in the United States as modified risk or reduced exposure, and (iii) our ability to license our technology and/or to sell our proprietary tobacco and products in international markets. Even after we receive regulatory approvals necessary to market our products in the United States or internationally, we must still meet the challenges of successful marketing, distribution and consumer acceptance.

Tobacco

Our primary mission in tobacco is to reduce the harm caused by smoking. The FDA publicly announcedacknowledged on July 28, 2017, that tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States, causing more thanStates. The repercussions include over 480,000 deaths per yearannually and withan economic toll of nearly $300 billion in lost productivity and direct health care and lost productivity costs, totaling nearly $300 billion each year in the United States. The website ofas reported the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) states.

5

Our innovative approach involves utilizing both genetically modified organism (“GMO”) and non-GMO methods to modify and develop proprietary bright, burley, and oriental RNC tobaccos, ensuring they grow with at least 95% less nicotine content. Our SPECTRUM® research cigarettes, developed in collaboration with independent researchers, officials from the FDA, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (“NIDA”), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), the National Cancer Institute (“NCI”), and the CDC, have played and continue to play a crucial role in independent clinical studies, with more than 32.8 million variable nicotine research cigarettes provided since 2011. The extensive body of scientific evidenced derived from these studies, published in peer-reviewed journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association, supports the potential impact of our RNC tobaccos. Smokers who opt for our RNC cigarettes in clinical studies experienced reductions in smoking (measured in cigarettes per day), nicotine exposure, and dependence, coupled with minimal or no evidence of compensatory smoking or withdrawal and without serious adverse events. A list of ongoing as well as completed and published clinical studies using cigarettes made with our RNC tobaccos may be viewed at https://www.xxiicentury.com/vln-clinical-studies/published-clinical-studies-on-very-low-nicotine-content-vlnc-cigarettes. These studies showed that smokers who used for RNC cigarettes increased their frequency of smoke-free days and doubled their efforts to quit smoking. SPECTRUM® research cigarettes persist as a key component in various independent scientific studies, aimed at substantiating the public health advantage acknowledged by the FDA and other entities. This advantage is associated with the FDA’s proposal to establish a national product standard requiring that all cigarettes incorporate “minimally or nonaddictive” levels of nicotine. Notably, our SPECTRUM® variable nicotine research cigarettes serve as the precursor to our innovative VLN® cigarette products.

Our conviction in the significant global market potential of our proprietary RNC cigarettes, marketed under the brand name VLN®, is rooted in substantial data. As outlined in a 2021 report by the Foundation for a Smoke Free World, global full nicotine cigarette retail sales reached an estimated 84.1% or $612 billion of the $853 billion market for products that contain nicotine. The statistics from the CDC and the World Health Organization (“WHO”) has reported that tobacco use causes more than 6highlight a substantial market, with over 1 billion global adult smokers and 30 million deaths per year globally and direct health care and lost productivity costs of more than $1.4 trillion per year around the world. The CDC website also states that in 2015, nearly 7 in 10 (68%) adult cigarette smokers wanted to stop smoking and more than 5 in 10 (55.4%) adult cigarette smokers had made a quit attempt in the prior year.U.S.

5

Despite the prevalence of various nicotine delivery systems, including vaping, our belief is that smokers are actively seeking alternatives to traditional addictive combustible cigarettes. Our confidence is reinforced by consumer perception studies, in which 60% of adult smokers expressed a likelihood to adopt VLN® as their preferred choice. Importantly, VLN® is currently available in the market for sale, positioning itself as a viable option for smokers seeking reduced harm alternatives.

Our proprietary VLN tobacco, which grows® cigarettes are currently available in a large number of top U.S. markets and present a groundbreaking alternative with 95% less nicotine content than conventional cigarettes. Maintaining a familiar combustible product format, VLN® replicates the conventional cigarette smoking experience, encompassing sensory and experiential elements such as taste, scent, smell, and the familiar “hand-to-mouth” behavior.

The tobacco used in conventionalVLN® cigarettes has been shown in published, independentis meticulously crafted to contain a targeted 0.5 milligrams of nicotine per gram of tobacco, a threshold recognized by the FDA, based on clinical studies, as being associated with reductions in“minimally or non-addictive.” We believe the reduced nicotine content of VLN® can establish a dissociation between the act of smoking nicotine exposure, and nicotine dependence, with minimal evidencethe rapid introduction of nicotine withdrawal, compensatory smoking, or serious adverse events. Theseto the bloodstream, which extensive clinical data indicates helps smokers to smoke less and potentially quit.

The results of numerous completed studies which were conducted by independent researchers and paid for by United States federal government agencies, provide a foundation ofserve as an independent scientific supportfoundation for recentlythe FDA’s advanced notice of proposed changes in the regulatory approachrule-making (“ANPRM”) on July 28, 2017, which announced FDA’s intention to institute a new rule to require that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine, also referred to addressas the harm caused by smoking combustible tobacco cigarettes. We believe these changes will significantly benefit us in the future as discussed in greater detail below.

Our Very Low NicotineComprehensive Plan for Tobacco and Nicotine Regulation. Although this proposal has not yet been finalized or adopted by the FDA, Mandatethe announcement supported our decision to Require Minimallysubmit and seek modified risk orders under MRTP applications (“MRTPAs”) for our VLN products. On December 23, 2021, we received authorization to market our VLN® cigarettes as a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (“MRTP”) using certain modified exposure claims.

We initiated efforts to offer our proprietary VLN® cigarettes for domestic sale after receiving the modified risk granted order. Furthermore, we continue to plan to evaluate opportunities to make VLN® available for international sale or Non-Addictive Levelslicensing by third parties.

6

Proposed Government Mandates Limiting the Nicotine in all Cigarettes in the United StatesCigarettes.

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (“Tobacco Control Act”) granted theIn a press release dated June 16, 2010, Dr. David Kessler, a former FDA authority over the regulation of all tobacco products in the United States. While the Tobacco Control Act prohibits the FDA from banning cigarettes outright, it allowsCommissioner, advocated for swift action by the FDA to require the reduction of nicotine or any other compound in tobacco and cigarette smoke.

In a June 16, 2010 press release, Dr. David Kessler, the former FDA Commissioner, recommended that “the FDA should quickly move to reducedecrease nicotine levels in cigarettes to non-addictive levels. If we reduce the level ofthresholds. Dr. Kessler emphasized that lowering the stimulus we reducelevel would consequently diminish cravings, deeming it the craving. It is the ultimate“ultimate harm reduction strategy.” Shortly thereafter, in aWashington Post newspaper article, Dr. Kessler said thatproposed reducing the amount of nicotine content in a cigarette should dropcigarettes from aboutapproximately 10 milligrams to less than 1 milligram.

Since 2011, the FDA, NIDA and other federal government agencies in the United States have invested more than $100 million in independent clinical studies utilizing our proprietary tobaccos, with such studies being conducted by scientists at many well-known locations, including the Mayo Clinic, the MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas, the Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Minnesota, the University of Vermont, the University of California, and others. Since 2011, we have provided more than 24 millionSPECTRUM research Notably, VLN® cigarettes for use in these independent scientific clinical studies.

The results of these independent clinical studies utilizing our proprietary tobaccos have been published in peer-reviewed articles in well-respected publications, including the October 2015 issue ofThe New England Journal of Medicine (N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1340-1349), which published the results of a clinical trial funded by NIDA and the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (“CTP”) that was a double-blinded, parallel, randomized clinical trial involving 840 smokers at ten locations that was led by the Center for the Evaluation of Nicotine in Cigarettes. The authors of the article inThe New England Journal of Medicine concluded that the proprietary VLN cigarettes created and supplied by us for such study were “associated with reductions in smoking, nicotine exposure, and nicotine dependence, with minimal evidence of nicotine withdrawal, compensatory smoking, or serious adverse events.” A list of the completed, independent clinical studies that used our proprietary VLN tobacco can be found on our website at http://www.xxiicentury.com/published-clinical-studies/. A list of the on-going, independent clinical studies on ourSPECTRUM research cigarettes can be found on our website at http://www.xxiicentury.com/on-going-clinical-studies/. Information on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

6

contain between 0.3 to 0.7 mg/g.

In 2015, the World Health Organization (“WHO”)WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation publishedissued an advisory note onendorsing a global nicotine reduction strategy, of limitingurging limitations on the sale of cigarettes to brands with a nicotine content that is not sufficient to lead to theinsufficient for addiction development and/or maintenance of addiction. The WHO report referred to such cigarettes as “reduced-nicotine” cigarettes. The WHO report stated that conventional cigarettes – even those brands that deliver low nicotineyields as measured by machine smoking under the conditions of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) – contain addicting levels of nicotine, but the nicotineyields are reduced as a result of many cigarette design features, including ventilated filters, with the result being that users puff ISO low-nicotine-yield cigarettes more intensely (i.e. they draw larger puffs more frequently than the conditions prescribed by machines) to obtain addicting levels of nicotine. However,maintenance. Although the WHO report found that, unlike conventional cigarettes,reduced-nicotinecontent cigarettes can limit the addictiveness of the product, as the very low nicotinecontentin the tobacco cannot deliver addicting levels of nicotine. The WHO study stated that published research shows that switching from conventional cigarettes to cigarettes with a reduced-nicotine content of 0.4 mg/g of cigarette tobacco filler doesdid not significantly increase craving or withdrawal symptoms and does not result in compensatory smoking (such as more intense smoking or smoking more cigarettes per day). The WHO study further stated that no specific amount of nicotine has yet been identified by the WHO as thespecify absolute threshold for addiction; however, the WHO reported stated thataddiction, it issuggested a likely to bethreshold equal to or possibly less than 0.4 mg/g of dry cigarette tobacco filler.

The WHO report cites 22nd Century’s Our proprietarySPECTRUM® research cigarettes were cited in the WHO study as meeting such athis low nicotine level of nicotine ofcriterion at 0.4 mg/g of cigarette tobacco filler.

The WHO report concluded that the evidence indicates that settingestablishing a maximum allowable nicotine content for all cigarettes could (i) reduce the acquisitioninitiation of smoking and progression to addiction, (ii) reduce thedecrease smoking prevalence of smoking in a proportion ofamong addicted smokers as a result ofthrough behavioral extinction, and (iii) increase quit rates while reducing relapse rates. Emphasizing population-wide benefits, the rate of quitting and reducereport highlighted the number of smokers who relapse, and (iv) increase the development, availability, and use of alternative forms of nicotine, e.g. smokeless tobacco products, nicotine aerosol products, and medicinal nicotine, which have potential adverse health effects, including maintenance of addiction, but less than those of combusted products or conventional cigarettes. The WHO report stated that population benefits will result from decreased use ofdecrease in combusted tobacco byuse among current cigarette smokers and from the prevention of non-smokers, particularly young people, from developing addiction of non-smokers to cigarettes, especially among young people.

cigarettes.

On July 28, 2017, FDAin connection with the ANPRM then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., announced the FDA’s planintention to exerciseuse its authority under the Tobacco Control Act to require that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States must contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine. In that public announcement, FDA Commissioner Gottlieb stated that (i) the overwhelming amount of death and disease attributable to tobacco is caused by addiction to cigarettes – the only legal consumer product that, when used as intended, will kill half of all long-term users, (ii) unless this course is changed, 5.6 million young people alive today will die prematurely later in life from tobacco use, (iii) envisioning a world where cigarettes would no longer create or sustain addiction, and where adults who still need or want nicotine could get it from alternative and less harmful sources, needs to be the cornerstone of the FDA’s efforts, and (iv) tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States, causing more than 480,000 deaths per year and direct health care and lost productivity costs totaling nearly $300 billion each year.

On August 16, 2017,TheNew England Journal of Medicine published an article by FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. and Mitchell Zeller, J.D., the Director of the FDA/CTP, entitled “A Nicotine-Focused Framework of Public Health.” In this article, FDA Commissioner Gottlieb and FDA/CTP Director Zeller stated that the Tobacco Control Act gives the FDA a regulatory tool called a tobacco “product standard” that can be used to alter the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes, and that such standards may set requirements related to an ingredient or constituent in a tobacco product, or related to any other aspect of product composition, construction, or other property, and that the establishment of the right product standard could alter the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes by setting maximum nicotine levels in such products. The article further stated that Section 907 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act authorizes the FDA to establish tobacco product standards that the FDA has determined to be appropriate for the protection of the public health, with the statute specifically noting that such a standard may address nicotine yields, among other characteristics. Although the statute prohibits the FDA from requiring the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to zero, the FDA stated in this article that the FDA has clear authority to otherwise reduce nicotine levels. The FDA concluded in this article that a nicotine-limiting standard could make cigarettes minimally addictive or non-addictive, helping current users of combustible cigarettes to quit and allowing most future users to avoid becoming addicted and proceeding to regular use, and that disrupting that progression – from experimentation to regular use to tobacco-related disease and even death – could save millions of American lives. In this article, the FDA also stated that the FDA will consider peer-reviewed, scientific studies in proposing a maximum nicotine level, but that rigorous studies of Very Low Nicotine cigarettes have evaluated the potential effects of various nicotine levels on smoking behaviors and biomarkers, and findings from such studies could inform decision-making on a possible maximum nicotine level in tobacco filler. The FDA stated that, as in all matters of public health policy, the FDA will be led by the science in this important area.

7

On October 5, 2017, Dr. Dorothy Hatsukami, the Co-Director of the Center for the Evaluation of Nicotine in Cigarettes and a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Tobacco Research Programs at the University of Minnesota, publicly announced at the 5th Annual Conference on Tobacco Regulatory Science at the Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, partial results of a newly completed Phase III clinical study of 1,250-patients from all demographics over a 20-week study period in 10 study locations across the United States that compared smokers who were assigned to (i) an immediate reduction to Very Low Nicotine content cigarettes, (ii) a gradual reduction in reduced nicotine content cigarettes, or (iii) normal nicotine content cigarettes. Dr. Hatsukami publicly stated that the full results of this Phase III study are in peer review prior to publication, but that the results reflect that an immediate approach to nicotine reduction is most likely to lead to less harm. Dr. Hatsukami also publicly stated that the study data indicates compensatory smoking is less likely to occur with an immediate reduction in nicotine, and that there was a greater likelihood of more rapid smoking cessation with the immediate approach to nicotine reduction. Our Company provided all the research cigarettes used in this Phase III study.

Since 2011, the FDA, NIDA and other federal government agencies have invested more than $100 million in independent clinical studies utilizing our proprietary tobaccos, with such studies being conducted by scientists at many different and well-known clinical study centers. During that same time, we have provided more than 24 million proprietarySPECTRUM research cigarettes for use in such independent clinical studies. The results of these studies have been published in peer-reviewed articles and reflect the independent scientific support for the planned mandate by the FDA that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine. We believe this announcement marked a significant step towards reducing the addictive nature of cigarettes.

Following this announcement, on August 16, 2017, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., and Mitchell Zeller, J.D., the Director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products (“FDA/CTP”), authored and titled “A Nicotine-Focused Framework of Public Health,” published in The New England Journal of Medicine. The article discussed the regulatory tool provided by the Tobacco Control Act, known as a tobacco “product standard,” which could be employed to alter the addictiveness of combustible cigarettes. While the statute prohibited reducing nicotine yields to zero, the FDA asserted its clear authority to otherwise reduce nicotine levels. The conclusion drawn was that a nicotine-limiting standard could render cigarettes minimally or non-addictive, aiding current users in quitting and preventing most future users from developing addiction. The FDA emphasized its commitment to being guided by scientific principles in shaping health policy. This commitment was reiterated in the context of addressing nicotine levels in cigarettes, underlining the importance of evidence-based decision-making.

We believe that recent political changes and perceptions towards nicotine addiction have the potential to be favorable to our business prospects from a policy priority and regulatory standpoint. Under the new leadership at the FDA and Center for Tobacco Products (“CTP”), we believe that the FDA could refocus on implementing its ground-breaking Comprehensive Plan for Tobacco and Nicotine Regulation, and specifically could renew efforts to cap the amount of nicotine in combustible cigarettes to a “minimally or non-addictive” level. We believe that the MRTP authorization and the launch of our VLN® cigarettes could serve as a powerful catalyst supporting any such policies.

For example, on January 27, 2022, the FDA posted an update on its FDA Voices site stating that it “remains on track” with its plans to prohibit menthol in combustible tobacco products. The FDA published a proposed tobacco product standard to ban menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes in April 2022. The proposed FDA rule includes a process for firms to request an exemption from the standard for specific products of certain types on a case-by-case basis, indicating “reduced nicotine” as an example of such an exemption. On August 1, 2022, we submitted public comments in support of a tobacco product standard for menthol in cigarettes.

7

In June 2022, the FDA announced that the Biden-Harris Administration published plans for future regulatory action that includes the FDA’s plans to develop a proposed product standard that would establish a maximum nicotine level to reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes and certain other combusted tobacco products. On June 21, 2022, a proposed rule for a tobacco product standard for nicotine level of certain tobacco products was published in the Spring 2022 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.

In late October 2022, in coordination with the FDA, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and others, we received an order for 2.8 million variable nicotine cigarettes. We believe our research cigarettes will continue to fuel numerous independent, scientific studies that could evaluate the potential benefits suggested by the FDA and others of implementing a national standard requiring all cigarettes to contain minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine.

The FDA rule making process continued to advance throughout 2023 on both the proposed menthol ban and the proposed reduced nicotine content standard, but announcement of an FDA proposed rule was delayed multiple times for additional public comment and analysis.

We continue to advance on our reduced nicotine technology as we believe that our next generation, non-GMO plant research is the key to commercializing our reduced nicotine content tobacco and technology in international markets where non-GMO products are preferred or where GMO products are banned. Our patented, non-GMO technology can introduce very low nicotine traits into virtually any variety of tobacco, including bright, burley, and oriental. We have successfully applied our non-GMO technology to bright and burley varieties of tobacco and have initiated commercial growing activities for our non-GMO bright and burley reduced nicotine varieties. We anticipate commercial production of our American blend cigarettes featuring a mix of bright and burley VLN® tobacco varieties to begin in 2024.We believe that our RNC tobacco technology and our production and delivery of more than 24 millionmillions of proprietary variable nicotine research cigarettes since 2011 reflects thatdemonstrates the technical achievability of the FDA’s plan to dramatically reduce nicotine in cigarettes is technologically feasible. Since our proprietary VLN tobacco has been the subject of numerous completed and on-going clinical studies, we are investigating the potential use of our VLN tobacco in our own products that will be intended to comply with the new FDA regulations, as well as we are investigating the potential license of the use of our VLN tobacco by third-parties. cigarettes.

In the United States, we will focusare focused on working with the FDA on its efforts to reduce nicotine reduction mandate and on submitting a Modified Risk Tobacco Product application for ourBRAND AVery Low Nicotinein cigarettes. Outside the United States, we will focus on working with WHO-member countries that desire to utilize our proprietary VLNRNC tobacco to implement the WHO recommendation of limiting the sale of cigarettes to brands with a nicotine content that is not sufficient to lead to development and/or maintenance of addiction.

Products

BRAND A Very Low Nicotine Cigarettes

The tobacco in ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes contains approximately 95% less nicotine than conventional cigarette brands. The strategy behindBRAND A is to reduce smokers’ exposure to nicotine, which is the primary addictive component of cigarettes.

We are working to resubmit a Modified Risk Tobacco Product application toProducts (MRTP)

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (“Tobacco Control Act”) granted the FDA to obtain a reduced exposure marketing authorization for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes to be marketed as “less addictive” and/or containing 95% less nicotine than conventionalauthority over the regulation of all tobacco cigarettes.

products in the United States. The Tobacco Control Act further establishes procedures for the FDA to regulate the labeling and marketing of Modified Risk Tobacco Products,so-called MRTP, which includes, cigarettesamong other things tobacco products that may (i) reduce harm or the risk of tobacco-related disease or (ii) reduce or eliminate exposure to tobacco toxins and (ii) are reasonably likely to pose lower health risks, as compared to conventional cigarettes (“Modified Risk Cigarettes”).a substance. The Tobacco Control Act requiredalso includes provisions allowing the FDA to issue specific regulationssubmission and guidance regarding applications submitted to the FDA for the authorization to label and market Modified Risk Cigarettes. On March 30, 2012, the FDA issuedModified Risk Tobacco Product Applications Draft Guidance. We believe that ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes will qualify as Modified Risk Cigarettes.

8

On December 31, 2015, we submitted to the FDAof a Modified Risk Tobacco Product application requesting a reduced exposure marketing authorization from the FDA to marketBRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette with product labeling and advertising that states thatBRAND A has 95% less nicotine than conventional cigarettes. In December 2016, the FDA provided us with feedback on our combined Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application (“MRTPA”) and Premarket Tobacco Product Application (“PMTA”) for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine tobacco cigarettes. In response to the FDA’s requests, and in conjunction with additional clarifying guidance, we withdrew our existing application with the FDA in order to file a new MRTPA andtobacco product, where the PMTA with the FDA forBRAND A that will include additionalincludes scientific data and other information requested bythat demonstrates the FDA.new tobacco product is appropriate for the protection of public health.

In support of our expanded work on our revised MRTPA and PMTA for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes,On December 5, 2018, we have increased the depth and experience of our scientific and regulatory team. On October 31, 2017, we hired Dr. James E. Swauger to be our new Senior Vice President of Science and Regulatory Affairs. Dr. Swauger was previously the leader of the scientific and regulatory functions at Reynolds American Inc., one of the largest tobacco companies in the United States. Dr. Swauger’s primary responsibilities with us will be to lead and oversee our scientific and regulatory affairs, plant biotechnology, research and development, and external scientific activities, including the resubmissionsubmitted to the FDA ofa PMTA and on December 17, 2019, the FDA issued a marketing order in response to our MRTPA and PMTA for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes. On December 4, 2017, we hired Dr. Juan TamburrinoPMTA. While the FDA’s marketing order authorized us to be our new Vice President of Research and Development. Dr. Tamburrino was previouslymarket the head of the Plant Biotechnology Division of British American Tobacco, one of the largest tobacco companiesproducts in the world. Dr. Tamburrino will beU.S., it did not allow us to make reduced exposure claims which would indicate that the product contains 95% less nicotine. Marketing such reduced exposure claims requires the FDA to authorize an integral partMRTPA.

Because of our scientific and regulatory team workingthis, on our resubmissionDecember 27, 2018, we submitted to the FDA an MRTPA, seeking FDA authorization to market our reduced nicotine combustible cigarettes with certain reduced exposure claims. In the MRTPA, we requested authorization from the FDA to market our reduced nicotine tobacco cigarettes with certain product labeling claims under the brand name of VLN®.

8

On December 23, 2021, we secured the first and only MRTP designation for a combustible cigarette for VLN® King and VLN® Menthol King 95% reduced nicotine content cigarettes. The FDA authorized the marketing of VLN® with the following reduced exposure claims: “95% less nicotine”, “Helps reduce your nicotine consumption”, and “Greatly reduces your nicotine consumption,”. The FDA also required that any use of these claims be accompanied by the statement that the product “Helps You Smoke Less,” which we consider an evidence-based claim supporting our products.

In previous years, we contracted with farmers to grow considerable quantities of RNC tobacco in anticipation of FDA authorization of our MRTPAMRTP and PMTAsubsequent commercial launch of VLN® cigarettes. In January 2022, at our manufacturing facility in North Carolina, we produced the first cartons of our VLN® reduced nicotine cigarettes, destined for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotinecommercial sale. In April 2022, we launched VLN® cigarettes and our continuing research and development of improved Very Low Nicotine tobacco plants.

SPECTRUM® Government Research Cigarettes

NIDA, which is a part of NIH, providesin the scientific community with controlled and uncontrolled research chemicals and drug compounds through its Drug Supply Program. In 2010, NIDA included an option to develop and produce research cigarettes with various levels of nicotine (from very low to high) in its request for proposals for a five-year contract for Preparation and Distribution of Research and Drug Products. We agreed, as a subcontractor to RTI International (“RTI”), to supply cigarettes with different nicotine contents (from very low to high) to NIDA. In August 2010, we met with officials from NIDA, FDA, RTI, CDC and the National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) to finalize certain aspects of the design of these research cigarettes. These government research cigarettes produced by us under the markSPECTRUM® have been, and continue to be, distributed by RTI for NIDA to independent researchers for scientific clinical studies. TheSPECTRUM® research cigarette contract was renewed in 2015 for an additional five years.

Since 2011, the FDA, NIDA and other federal government agencies have invested more than $100 million in independent clinical studies utilizing our proprietary tobaccos, with such studies being conducted at many well-known locations, including the Mayo Clinic, the MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas, the Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Minnesota, the University of Vermont, the University of California, and others. Since 2011, we have provided more than 24 millionSPECTRUM® research cigarettes for use in these independent clinical studies, with the most recent shipment of 2.4 millionSPECTRUM® research cigarettes occurring in November 2017. TheSPECTRUM® product line consists of a series of 24 cigarette styles (11 regular and 13 menthol versions) that have 8 different levels of nicotine – from very low to high. A list of the completed, independent clinical studies on our proprietary tobaccos can be found on our website at http://www.xxiicentury.com/published-clinical-studies/. A list of the on-going, independent clinical studies on our proprietary VLN tobacco can be found on our website at http://www.xxiicentury.com/on-going-clinical-studies/. Information on our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

9

X-22 Prescription Smoking Cessation Aid

X-22 is a tobacco-based botanical medical product for use as an aid to smoking cessation. OurX-22 therapy protocol calls for patients to smoke exclusively ourX-22 cigarettes over a six-week treatment period to facilitate the goal of the patient quitting smoking by the end of the treatment period.U.S. market. We believe thatX-22 the commercialization of VLN® cigarettes made fromwill create further opportunities for us to license our proprietary VLN tobacco satisfy smokers’ cravings for cigarettes while (i) greatly reducing nicotine exposure and nicotine dependence and (ii) extinguishing the association between the act of smokingtechnology tobaccos and the rapid delivery of nicotine.X-22 involves the same smoking behavior as conventional cigarettes and, because patients are simply switching to cigarettes with a low nicotine content for 6 weeks,X-22 does not expose the smoker to any new drugs or new side effects.VLN® brand.

VLN® Commercialization Plan

Independent clinical studies have demonstrated that smokers who smoke cigarettes containing our proprietaryIn April 2022, we initiated VLN tobacco smoke fewer cigarettes per day resulting® sales in significant reductions in smoke exposure, including “tar,” nicotine, and carbon monoxide. Due to the very low nicotine levels, compensatory smoking does not occur with cigarettes containing our proprietary VLN tobacco. A list of the completed, independent clinical studies that used our proprietary VLN tobacco can be found on our webiste at http://www.xxiicentury.com/published-clinical-studies/. We do not incorporate the information on our website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As a result of the FDA’s announcement on July 28, 2017 to require the reduction of nicotine to minimally or non-addictive levels in all cigarettes soldmore than 150 Circle K stores in the United States,Chicago metro area through a pilot launch. After the pilot concluded and given the positive results, we do not believe that there will be a marketmade the decision to further deepen our reach in the United States for a prescription-based product consistingstate of Illinois and launch VLN® in Colorado to more than 3,000 potential locations across the state with our network of retailers and distribution partners, including Eagle Rock Distributing Company and Creager Mercantile.

The pilot enabled us to refine our VLN tobacco because tobacco with minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine will be mandated by the FDA in all combustible tobacco cigarettes in the United States. Accordingly, we will continue to explore opportunities outside of the United States forX-22 in markets where a prescription-based, smoking cessation product may be appropriate.

BRAND B Low-Tar-to-Nicotine Ratio Cigarettes

Using a proprietary high nicotine tobacco blend in conjunction with specialty cigarette components,BRAND B allows the smoker® rollout strategy and helped us develop our VLN® sales launch blueprint, an efficient, reproducible sales plan that focuses our resources to achieve a satisfactory amount of nicotine per cigarette while inhaling less “tar” and carbon monoxide. At the same time, we do not expect exposure to nicotine fromBRAND B to be significantly higher than commercially available full flavor cigarette brands. We believe smokers who desire to reduce smoke exposure, but are less concerned about nicotine, may findBRAND B beneficial.

greatest returns. In a 2001 report, entitledClearing the Smoke, Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction, the Institute of Medicine (the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences) notes that a low “tar”/moderate nicotine cigarette is a viable strategy for reducing the harm caused by smoking. The report states: “Retaining nicotine at pleasurable or addictive levels while reducing the more toxic components of tobacco is another general strategy for harm reduction.”

We had previously intended to submit a Modified Risk Tobacco Product application to the FDA forBRAND B. However, as a result of the FDA’s announcement on July 28, 2017 to require thereduction of nicotine to minimally or non-addictive levels in all cigarettes sold in the United States, we no longer believe that there will be a market in the United States forBRAND B. As such, we will continue to explore opportunities outside of the United States forBRAND B in markets where that product may be appropriate.

RED SUN and MAGIC Cigarettes

Our subsidiary, Goodrich Tobacco Company, LLC (“Goodrich Tobacco”), introduced in a limited capacity two super-premium priced cigarette brands,RED SUN andMAGIC, into the U.S. market in the first quarter 2011. From the year 2011 through the year 2014, there werede minimis sales of these brands since we intentionally did not expand the marketing and distribution of these brands until after we became a subsequent participating manufacturer under the Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) which occurred on August 29, 2014, when the 46 Settling States under the MSA approved our acquisition of NASCO Products, LLC (“NASCO”) and NASCO became a subsequent participating manufacturer under the MSA. During the remainder of 2014, we worked to obtain approvals from regulatory agencies in all 50 States to have ourRED SUN brand listed on the state directories of tobacco products approved for sale in each such state. During 2014, we also worked withOrion, a cigarette manufacturer in Poland, to contract manufacture our proprietary tobacco products for distribution in the European Union, starting with ourMAGIC brand. In 2015, we focused our marketing efforts forRED SUN on national and regional distributors, tobacconists, smoke shops and other tobacco outlets in the United States. In 2015, we also introduced ourMAGIC cigarettes to distributors and retailers in Spain. We ceased marketing theMAGIC brand in Spain when the European Union changed its packaging laws to no longer allow companies to print the nicotine yield on cigarette packs. In response to the planned mandate by the FDA that all cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine, we discontinued sales in the United States of ourRED SUN brand as of December 31, 2017. We will continue to explore opportunities outside of the United States for ourRED SUN andMAGIC brands in markets where such products may be appropriate.

10

Hemp

Our primary mission in hemp/cannabis is to develop proprietary hemp strains for potential important new medicines and agricultural crops. Our current activities involve work with only legal hemp in full compliance with federal and state laws. The hemp plant and the cannabis/marijuana plant are both part of the samecannabis sativa genus/species of plant, except that hemp has less than 0.3% dry weight content of THC and is legal under federal and state laws. The same plant with a higher THC content is cannabis/marijuana, which is legal under certain state laws, but which is not legal under federal law. The similarities between these plants can cause confusion. Our activities with fully legal hemp have sometimes been incorrectly perceived as us being involved in federally illegal cannabis/marijuana. This is not the case. We work only with legal hemp in full compliance with federal and state laws.

We currently sponsor hemp research in Canada and in the United States. In Canada, we conduct sponsored research on hemp through Botanical Genetics, which is our wholly-owned subsidiary and which was incorporated to facilitate an equity investment in Anandia Laboratories, Inc. (“Anandia”), a plant biotechnology company based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. On September 15, 2014, Botanical Genetics was granted a sublicense by Anandia to 2 patents and 23 patent applications relating to genes in the hemp/cannabis plant that are required for the production of cannabinoids, the “active ingredients” in the hemp/cannabis plant, with such sublicense being exclusive in the United States and co-exclusive with Anandia everywhere else in the world, except Canada where Anandia has retained exclusive rights. The Anandia sublicense continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be in 2035. Under licenses granted by the Canadian government to Anandia, we conduct research and development on unique plant varieties of hemp at Anandia, such as (i) hemp plants with low to no amounts of THC for the legal hemp industry, and (ii) hemp plants with high levels of CBD and other non-THC cannabinoids for the legal medical cannabinoid markets. Anandia and 22nd Century conduct all activities in this scientific collaboration within the parameters of all applicable licenses and permits held by Anandia for such work. The agreements with Anandia grant us exclusive rights to commercialize in the United States (and co-exclusive with Anandia everywhere else in the world outside of Canada and the United States) all results of this collaboration in consideration of royalty payments by us to Anandia.

On March 23, 2017, we publicly announced that our strategic collaboration with Anandia had resulted in new industrial hemp plants that have zero (-0-) amounts of THC (“ZERO-THC”). We believe that our ZERO-THC hemp plants are a potential solution to one of the biggest challenges facing the legal hemp industry because, currently, hemp crops that grow with THC levels above the legal limit of 0.3% THC are required to be destroyed and hemp farmers cannot obtain crop insurance to protect against this risk. However, our ZERO-THC plants offer a potential solution to this risk because our ZERO-THC hemp plants will not develop THC above the legal limits for hemp.

In the United States, we conduct sponsored research on hemp at the University of Virginia (“UVA”). In December 2016, we entered into a sponsored research agreement with UVA and an exclusive license agreement with the University of Virginia Patent Foundation d/b/a University of Virginia Licensing & Ventures Group (“UVA LVG”). Over the ensuing three years, we will invest approximately $1,000,000 in this scientific collaboration. The goals of the research agreement include: (i) creating unique industrial hemp plants with guaranteed levels of THC below the legal limits that define hemp for optimal growth in Virginia (thus eliminating the risk to growers of having to destroy non-conforming hemp crops), (ii) optimizing other desirable hemp plant characteristics to improve the plant’s suitability for growing in Virginia and in similar legacy tobacco regions of the United States, (iii) utilizing high-value medical cannabinoid hemp varieties and specialized cannabinoid extraction processes for use in human theraputics, and (iv) using our unique hemp plants for phytoremediation to clean up and reclaim polluted soils.

11

On October 19, 2017,November 2022, we announced that we had successfully completedintend to expand our hemp field trialsVLN® launch to Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah, and announced plans to expand into up to 18 U.S. states over the following 12 months. In January 2023 we announced distribution partnerships with UVA. The 22nd Century - UVA hemp field trials used multiple oilCore-Mark International and fiber varieties of hemp. The Company’s hemp harvest with UVA identified proprietary varieties of hemp that have excellent agronomic properties for growth in Virginia. We are working with UVA on expanded plantings in 2018Eby-Brown Company, two of the most promising varieties of our proprietary hemp plants to optimize plant growthlargest convenience store distributors in the legacy tobacco region of the United States. UVAU.S., providing access to retailers in virtually every key U.S. market.

By concentrating and 22nd Century conduct all activities in this scientific collaboration within the parameters of stategoing deeper into select geographies and federal licensesmarkets with high cigarette volume and permits held by UVAlarge adult smoker populations, we believe we can capture greater market share effectively. We also plan to target states where there is a tax exemption for such work. The agreements with UVA and UVA LVG grant us the exclusive rights to commercialize all results of the collaboration in consideration of royalty payments by us to UVA LVG.

We are also expanding our hemp activities in our home State of New York after the many public announcements by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo that New York State (“NYS”) intends to become a leading grower and producer of hemp and hemp-derived products. On October 30, 2017, we obtained a NYS hemp research and grower license to support our expanding hemp activities in New York.

MRTP. As of December 31, 2017, there were (i) 34March 1, 2024, we have secured regulatory authorizations to sell VLN® in 48 states in the United States and the District of Columbia that have legalized hemp, (ii) 29 states in the United StatesColumbia. At year-end 2023, our phased rollout strategy, progressing state by state and the District of Columbia that have laws and/or regulations that recognize, in one form or another, legitimate medical uses for cannabis/marijuana and consumer use of cannabis/marijuana in connection with medical treatment, and (iii) 9 states in the United States and the District of Columbia that have legalized cannabis/marijuana for adult recreational use. Many other states are considering similar legislation. Conversely, under the federal Controlled Substance Act (the “CSA”), the policies and regulations of the federal government and its agencies are that cannabis/marijuana has no medical benefit andregion by region, had placed VLN into a range of activities are prohibited, including cultivation, possession, personal use and interstate distribution of cannabis/marijuana. In the event the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) begins strict enforcement of the CSA in states that have laws legalizing medical and/or adult recreational cannabis/marijuana, there may be a direct and adverse impact to any future potential business or prospects that we may have in the cannabis/marijuana business. However, our current activities involve only work with legal hemp, which would continue since our hemp activities are permitted under applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations.

Intellectual Property

Our intellectual property enables us to decrease or increase the level of nicotine and other nicotinic alkaloids in tobacco plants and the levels of cannabinoids in hemp/cannabis plants through genetic engineering and plant breeding. The basic techniques include, but are not limited to, those that are used in the production of genetically modified (“GM”) varieties of other crops, which are also known as “biotech crops.”

We have extensive patent protection and exclusive rights covering tobacco plants with altered nicotine content produced from modifying expression of certain genes in the tobacco plant, including NBB, QTP, A622, MPO and several transcription factor genes, and tobacco products produced from these plants. With the exception of the QTP patent family that will expire in 2018, the majority of our patent families related to nicotine biosynthesis will expire between 2021 and 2034, with certain extensions of terms in the U.S. applications resulting from patent term adjustments at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (A “patent family” is a set of patents granted in various countries to protect a single invention.).

The creation and production of unique tobacco plants with agronomic traits of Very Low Nicotine levels, with sufficiently high germination rates, and sufficiently large plant yields at harvest, among many other desirable qualities, are necessary for the plants to be sufficiently reliable to be planted at commercial scale. The expiration of the QPT patent family in 2018 will provide third-parties with the freedom to target the QPT gene in the tobacco plant, but the targeting of the QPT gene alone does not mean that a third-party will be successful in creating a tobacco plant with altered levels of nicotine. The freedom to target the QPT gene means that a third-party may conduct scientific experiments to try to discover how to alter or affect the QPT gene in ways that may or may not result in a change in nicotine levels in the tobacco plant. If a third-party is subsequently able to learn, over time, how to utilize the QPT gene to alter nicotine levels in the tobacco plant, then such third-party would still need to develop and create a unique tobacco plant withvery low levels of nicotine (not just a “reduced nicotine” plant), which would involve, among many other things, multiple plantings over multiple generations of the plants to try to create stable and reliable Very Low Nicotine plants, with no assurance that any third-party could be successful in such efforts. However, if a third-party is able, over time, to develop a tobacco plant with very low levels of nicotine, then such third party would still need to develop a Very Low Nicotine plant with sufficiently high germination rates and sufficiently large plant yields at harvest for the plant to be sufficiently reliable to be planted in large quantities to support its use at commercial scale, which would again involve, among many other things, multiple plantings over multiple generations of the plants to determine the reliability and stability of the germination rates and plant yields at harvest of such plants.

While third-parties may desire to engage in experiments with the QPT gene, we already have proprietary VLN tobacco with germination rates, plant yields at harvest, and other desirable qualities that are acceptable to us for the plant to be sufficiently reliable to be planted by us at commercial scale. We have providedstore footprint spanning more than 24 million research cigarettes containing our proprietary VLN tobacco that was grown under strict contracts with our growers and then processed and finished into cigarettes at our factory. Thus, we believe that our VLN tobacco has the agronomic qualities that are sufficient to support its use5,000 stores in a commercial scale product. We are also developing our next-generation VLN tobacco to continue to maintain our competitive advantage in being a unique provider of VLN tobacco to third-parties that may desire to utilize it in their finished tobacco products.26 states.

In September 2014, we entered into a SublicenseTobacco Master Settlement Agreement with Anandia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Anandia Sublicense”). Under the terms of the Anandia Sublicense, we were granted an exclusive sublicense in the United States and a co-exclusive sublicense in the remainder of the world, excluding Canada, to 2 U.S. patents and 23 patent applications relating to genes in the hemp/cannabis plant that are required for the production of cannabinoids, the “active ingredients” in the hemp/cannabis plant. The Anandia Sublicense continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be in 2035. As a plant biotechnology company, our entry into the legal hemp markets is a natural evolution of our activities in a plant that has important research and commercial value and applications. Under licenses granted by the Canadian government to Anandia, we conduct research and development on unique plant varieties of hemp at Anandia, such as (i) plants with low to no amounts of THC for the legal hemp industry, and (ii) plants with high levels of CBD and other non-THC cannabinoids for the legal medical cannabinoid markets.

12

In December 2014, we entered into a Purchase Agreement with the National Research Council of Canada (“NRC”) to acquire certain patent rights that we had previously licensed from NRC. Under the terms of the NRC Purchase Agreement, we agreed to pay NRC a total amount of $1,213,000, of which a portion was paid in cash at the closing on December 23, 2014 and with the remaining balance of such amount being paid by us to NRC in installment payments over a three-year period. We made the final installment payment to NRC in a timely manner on December 22, 2017. We do not owe any further amounts to NRC.

We own various registered trademarks in the United States and around the world. We also have exclusive plant variety rights in the United States (plant variety protection certificates are issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“PVP”)) and Canada. A PVP certificate prevents anyone other than the owner/licensee from planting, propagating, selling, importing or exporting a plant variety for twenty (20) years in the U.S. and, generally, for twenty (20) years in other member countries of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, known as UPOV, an international treaty concerning plant breeders’ rights. There are currently more than 70 countries that are members of UPOV. Our current VLN tobacco is protected by PVP and our patent portfolio.

Licensing

We have been in negotiations with various parties in the tobacco, pharmaceutical, and hemp/cannabis industries for licensing our technology and proprietary plants and products. We believe that the FDA’s planned action to reduce nicotine in combustible cigarettes in the United States will increase opportunities for us to potentially license our VLN tobacco technology and plants to third-parties in the United States. Further, if the tobacco laws in foreign countries change in ways that are consistent with the WHO recommendation and that are similar to the FDA’s planned actions on reducing nicotine in cigarettes in the United States, we believe that international licensing opportunities relating to our VLN tobacco technology and plants will increase substantially.

On September 25, 2017, we announced that the Research License and Commercial Option Agreement, dated October 1, 2013 (the “BAT Research Agreement”), between us and British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited (“BAT”), a subsidiary of British American Tobacco plc, had ended, with BAT thereafter no longer having any rights with respect to any intellectual property or any other assets of our Company. We believe that the ending of the BAT Research Agreement was beneficial for us because we regained sole control over all rights to our intellectual property and we are no longer subject to the low monetary payments that would have resulted under the BAT Research Agreement. We believe that we have greater opportunities to negotiate significantly more favorable transactions relating to our VLN tobacco technology and plants in today’s market, especially after the FDA announcement in July 2017 of its intent to mandate nicotine reductions in combustible cigarettes, as compared to 2013 when we entered into the BAT Research Agreement. We are also now in a much stronger financial position as compared to 2013, which we believe will enable us to negotiate licensing transactions from a position of strength as compared to our much weaker financial position in 2013.

We also believe that our unique hemp plants, including our ZERO-THC hemp plants, will be highly desirable in the United States. Our ZERO-THC hemp plants can be a potential solution to one of the biggest challenges facing the legal hemp industry because, currently, hemp crops that grow with THC levels above the legal limit of 0.3% THC are required to be destroyed and hemp farmers cannot obtain crop insurance to protect against this risk. However, our ZERO-THC hemp plants can be a potential solution to this risk since our ZERO-THC hemp plants will not develop THC above legal limits for hemp. We are also developing high-value medicinal cannabinoid varieties of hemp and specialized cannabinoid extraction processes for use in human therapeutics, as well as the use of our unique hemp plants for phytoremediation to clean up and reclaim polluted soils. We believe that the many uses of legal hemp in the United States and the continued growth of the hemp industry in the United States will result in hemp business opportunities and hemp licensing opportunities for us for our unique hemp plants and the cannabinoid extracts therefrom.

13

Research and Development

Since our inception, the majority of our research and development (“R&D”) efforts have been outsourced to highly qualified groups in their respective fields. Since 1998, we have had multiple R&D agreements with North Carolina State University (“NCSU”) and others resulting in exclusive worldwide licenses to various patented technologies. We have utilized the same model employed by many public-sector research organizations, which entails obtaining an exclusive option or license agreement to any invention arising out of funded research. In all cases, we fund and control all patent filings as the exclusive licensee. This model of contracting with public-sector researchers has enabled us to control R&D costs while achieving our desired results, including obtaining exclusive intellectual property rights relating to our outsourced R&D.

In August 2016, we opened our own laboratory on the Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus in Buffalo, New York where we are conducting our own proprietary research and development activities in tobacco and hemp. On October 30, 2017, we obtained a New York State hemp research and grower license to support our expanding hemp activities in New York.

In December 2016, we entered into a sponsored research agreement with the University of Virginia (“UVA”) and an exclusive license agreement with the University of Virginia Patent Foundation d/b/a University of Virginia Licensing & Ventures Group (“UVA LVG”) pursuant to which we will invest approximately $1,000,000 over a three-year period with UVA to create unique industrial hemp plants with guaranteed levels of THC below the legal limits and to optimize other desirable hemp plant characteristics to improve the plant’s suitability for growing in Virginia and other legacy tobacco regions in the United States. This work with UVA will also involve the development and study of medically important cannabinoids to be extracted by UVA from our unique hemp plants and the use of our unique hemp plants for phytoremediation to clean up and reclaim polluted soils.

On October 19, 2017, we announced that UVA had completed its first successful harvest of our hemp plants and identified several promising hemp varieties that could form the foundation for commercial hemp production throughout the legacy tobacco regions of the United States. The 22nd Century-UVA hemp field trials used multiple oil and fiber varieties of hemp. Our hemp harvest with UVA identified proprietary varieties of hemp that have excellent agronomic properties for growth in Virginia. We intend to use the most promising hemp varieties for expanded hemp plantings with UVA in Virginia in 2018. We are also working with UVA on the development of high-value medicinal cannabinoid varieties of hemp and specialized cannabinoid extraction processes for use in human therapeutics. We incurred $297,710 of expenses for the R&D agreement at UVA for the year ended December 31, 2017. UVA and 22nd Century are conducting all activities in this scientific collaboration within the parameters of state and federal licenses and permits held by UVA for such work. The agreements with UVA and UVA LVG grant 22nd Century exclusive rights to commercialize all results of the collaboration in consideration of royalty payments by our Company to UVA LVG.

We committed to an R&D agreement with NCSU relating to nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco plants and incurred $162,408 in R&D expenses for the period from February 2014 through January 2016. We extended the agreement through January 31, 2017 at an additional cost of $85,681. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we expensed $7,140 and $78,541, respectively, relating to this extended R&D agreement. We extended and amended our R&D agreement with NCSU as of February 13, 2018 to continue our research and development activities with NCSU relating to very low nicotine tobacco plants for a cost of approximately $88,000.

14

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, we incurred total R&D expenses of $3,366,468, $2,340,958, and $1,571,365 respectively.

MSA Membership

In September 2013, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “NASCO Acquisition”) to purchase all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of NASCO, a federally licensed tobacco product manufacturer and subsequent participating manufacturer under the Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) (the “NASCO Acquisition”). The MSA is an accord reached in November 1998 between the State Attorneys General of 46 states, five U.S. territories, the District of Columbia and the five largest tobacco companies in the United States concerning the advertising, marketing and promotion of tobacco products. The MSA also set standards for, and imposes restrictions on, the sale and marketing of cigarettes by participating cigarette manufacturers. On August 29, 2014, we entered into an Amended Adherence Agreement with the 46 Settling States under the MSA pursuant to which the Company was approved to acquire NASCO and become a subsequent participating manufacturer under the MSA. On that same date, we closed the NASCO Acquisition and became a subsequent participating manufacturer under the MSA. NASCO has since been aour wholly-owned subsidiary of our Company.subsidiary.

Tobacco Manufacturing

We lease aour cigarette manufacturing facility and warehouse located in Mocksville, North Carolina. In 2013, we purchased certain (i) cigarette manufacturing equipment, and (ii) equipment parts, factory items, office furniture and fixtures, vehicles and computers from the bankruptcy estate of PTM Technologies, Inc. (“PTM”) for approximately $3.22$3.2 million.

9

The facility was primarily in a pre-manufacturing stage during 2014 as we sought approval during that time for us to become a subsequent participating manufacturer under the MSA. SinceOn August 29, 2014, the Company has beenwe became a subsequent participating manufacturemanufacturer under the MSA. Since 2015, we have manufactured and sold ourSPECTRUM® government variable nicotine research cigarettes, together with a third-party MSA cigarette brand, and severalas well as third-party filtered cigar brands and MSA-compliant cigarette brands, at our factory in North Carolina.

OurThe strategic acquisition of our factory has allowed us to become vertically integrated so that we can control production priorities/timing and maintain the required high quality of our products, including ourSPECTRUM® research cigarettes. Incigarettes and our MRTP-designated VLN® brand cigarettes featuring 95% less nicotine than the future, our factory will also allow us to produce our own VLN cigarettetop 100 leading brands sold in the event they comply with the FDA mandateUnited States. In January 2022, our cigarette manufacturing facility began production of VLN® King and VLN® Menthol King cigarettes. With high-speed manufacturing capabilities we continue to attract additional CMO business to absorb our manufacturing overhead and help keep our unit cost profile low.

In 2023, we leased additional warehouse space in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. This bonded and temperature conditioned space will further support VLN® growth and provide additional distribution opportunities for reduced nicotine in cigarettes, as well as ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes if the FDA approves our MRTPA and PMTA filings forBRAND A.customers.

Tobacco Sources of Raw Materials

We obtain a large portion of our reduced nicotine tobacco leaf from farmersthird party-growers, primarily in multiple states in the United States thatwho are under direct contracts with us. These contracts prohibit the transfer of our proprietary tobaccos, seeds and plant materials to any other parties.party. We purchase the balanceconventional tobacco destined for contract manufacturing operations through third parties.

Research & Development (R&D) & Intellectual Property (IP)

Tobacco R&D

Since our inception, most of our research and development (“R&D”) efforts have been outsourced to highly qualified groups in their respective fields. Since 1998, we have had multiple R&D agreements with North Carolina State University (“NCSU”) and others resulting in exclusive worldwide licenses to various patented technologies. We have utilized the same model employed by many public-sector research organizations, which entails obtaining an exclusive option or license agreement to any invention arising out of our funded research. In all such cases, we fund and control all patent filings as the exclusive licensee. This model of contracting with public-sector researchers has enabled us to control R&D costs while achieving our desired results, including obtaining exclusive intellectual property rights relating to our outsourced R&D.

On June 22, 2018, we entered into an amendment to our existing license agreement with NCSU under which we exclusively licensed several bright and burley tobacco plant lines with Very Low Nicotine Content that are not genetically modified (non-GMO) plants. The amendment provided for us to pay NCSU a total exclusive license fee of $1.2 million. We will also pay running royalties to NCSU based on a portion of the net sales revenue received by us from sales of products that contain any portions of the plant materials that have been received by us from NCSU.

On October 22, 2018, we entered into a license agreement with the University of Kentucky (“UK”) to license on a non-exclusive basis a next-generation very low nicotine content burley tobacco plant lines that are not genetically modified (non-GMO) plants. The UK license agreement provided for us to pay UK a total license fee of $1.2 million. We will also pay running royalties to UK based on a portion of the net sales revenue received from sales of products that contain any portions of the plant materials that have been received from UK.

On December 1, 2021, we relocated our laboratory from Buffalo, New York to Rockville, Maryland, where we were conducting our own proprietary research and development activities in tobacco. In February 2024, we relocated our laboratory activities to our Mocksville, NC manufacturing facility. This reduces the fixed cost of our research and development activities, plus provides us an advantage with the proximity to our factory and NCSU.

10

In 2022, our R&D collaboration with NCSU delivered the proof of concept and field data for a new gene combination (non-GMO) to reduce nicotine below 95%. This unique gene combination enables the production of a better-quality leaf and an increase in yield. In January 2022, a utility patent to protect the new combination was filed. Our exclusive NCSU collaboration also yielded proof of concept and field data for Oriental lines with a 90-95% nicotine reduction. These results will give us the option in the future to produce VLN cigarettes that comprise burley, oriental, and bright tobacco thus improving overall quality. In addition, this year we extended our VLN production field trial to include new burley and flue-cured VLN (non-GMO).

We are currently developing new versions of our RNC cigarettes utilizing these non-GMO tobacco lines for future commercialization in the U.S. and globally.

Tobacco IP

Our intellectual property enables us to alter the level of nicotine and other nicotinic alkaloids in tobacco plants through third parties. As we prepare forgenetic engineering and modern plant breeding. The basic techniques include, but are not limited to, those that are used in the anticipated increased need for our proprietary VLNproduction of genetically modified and gene-edited varieties of other crops, which are also known as “biotech crops.”

We have extensive patent protection and exclusive rights covering tobacco plants with altered nicotine content produced by modifying the expression of genes that control the biosynthesis of nicotine in the tobacco plant. Our patent families related to nicotine biosynthesis are expected to expire between 2026 and 2043, with certain extensions of terms in the U.S. applications resulting from patent term adjustments at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (a “patent family” is a set of patent applications and patents, filed in various countries, that relate to at least one common earlier application).

Plant variety protection (“PVP”) certificates are issued in the United States by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A PVP certificate prevents anyone other than the owner/licensee from planting, propagating, selling, importing, or exporting a plant variety for twenty (20) years in the eventU.S. and, generally, for twenty (20) years in other member countries of the FDA mandatesInternational Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, known as UPOV, an international treaty concerning plant breeders’ rights. There are currently more than 70 countries that all combustible cigarettes contain only minimally or non-addictive levelsare members of nicotine,UPOV. Our current RNC tobaccos are protected by our patent portfolio.

In addition to our patents, patent applications, and PVP certificates, we intend to increase the amount of tobacco leaf we obtain directly from farmers under contract, bothown various registered trademarks in the United States and in foreign countries.

We likewise grow hemp under contractsaround the world. In November 2023, we signed an additional reduced nicotine content technology license with farmers that prohibitNCSU, providing additional modes of efficiently producing reduced nicotine content tobacco plants and extending our IP portfolio. This license will provide exclusive rights to the transfer of our proprietary seeds and plant materials to other parties.

technology until 2042.

Government Regulation

FDA MandateThe development, testing, manufacturing, and marketing of our products and potential products are subject to Require Minimally or Non-Addictive Levels of Nicotine in all Cigarettesextensive regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and throughout the world.

11

FDA Regulation of Tobacco Products

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act which became law in June 2009, granted(“Tobacco Control Act”) amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) to provide the FDA with broad authority overto regulate the regulationmanufacture, quality control, advertising, promotion, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, recordkeeping, premarket authorization, post-authorization monitoring and post-authorization reporting of all tobacco products, inincluding our tobacco products. Among its authorities, the United States.FDA requires that manufacturers of tobacco products first introduced or modified after February 15, 2007, undergo premarket review and obtain premarket authorization prior to commercialization. While the Tobacco Control Act prohibits the FDA from banning cigarettes outright, or mandating that nicotine levels be reduced to zero, it does allow the FDA to require the reduction of nicotine or other compounds in tobacco and cigarette smoke. The FDA has authority to restrict marketing and advertising, impose regulations on packaging, mandate warnings and disclosure of flavors or other ingredients, prohibit the sale of tobacco products with certain flavors or other characteristics, limit or prohibit the sale of tobacco products by certain retail establishments and the sale of tobacco products in certain packaging sizes, and seek to hold retailers and distributors responsible for the adverse health effects associated with both smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. In 2009, the Tobacco Control Act also banned all sales in the United States of cigarettes with flavored tobacco (other than menthol). As of June 2010, all cigarette companies were required to cease usinguse of the terms “low tar,” “light” and “ultra light” in describing cigarettes sold in the United States.

On July 28, 2017, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D., announced the FDA’s plan to exercise its authority under the Tobacco Control Act to require that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine. The FDA will be engaging in a required rule-making process to enact such new nicotine reduction regulations. It is uncertain how long the FDA rule-making process will take to complete.

We believe this regulatory environment represents a paradigm shift for the tobacco industry and will create opportunities for us in marketingBRAND A and in licensing our proprietary technology and/or tobaccos to larger competitors.

15

Modified Risk Cigarettes

The Tobacco Control Act, establishes proceduresits implementing regulations and its 2016 deeming regulations establish broad FDA regulatory authority over all tobacco products and, among other provisions:

impose restrictions on the advertising, promotion, sale and distribution of tobacco products;
establish pre-market review pathways for new and modified tobacco products;
prohibit any express or implied claims that a tobacco product is or may be less harmful than other tobacco products without FDA authorization;
authorize the FDA to impose tobacco product standards that are appropriate for the protection of the public health; and
equip the FDA with a variety of investigatory and enforcement tools, including the authority to inspect product manufacturing and other facilities.

The Tobacco Control Act requires manufacturers of tobacco products to, among, other things, provide FDA with a list of ingredients added to tobacco products in the manufacturing process and register any establishment engaged in the manufacture, preparation, or processing of a tobacco product. The manufacture of products is subject to strict quality control, testing and record-keeping requirements, and continuing obligations regarding the submission of safety reports and other post-market information. The FDA has several investigatory and enforcement tools available to it, including document requests and other required information submissions, facility inspections, examinations and investigations, injunction proceedings, monetary penalties, product withdrawal and recall orders, and product seizures.

The Tobacco Control Act also authorizes FDA to promulgate regulations requiring that the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, preproduction design validation, packing, and storage of a tobacco product conform to current good manufacturing practice (“CGMP”). On March 8, 2023, FDA issued a proposed rule to promulgate such regulations. The proposed rule, if finalized, would establish requirements for manufacturers of finished and bulk tobacco products on the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, pre-production design validation, packing, and storage of tobacco product.

12

Regulation of Menthol Cigarettes

In April 2022, the FDA announced proposed product standards to prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes) and prohibit all characterizing flavors (other than tobacco) in cigars. In January 2023, the Semi-Annual Agenda for Fall 2022 was released in the US. Here, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), stated that it intended to issue a final rule on Menthol in Cigarettes. This product standard, if enacted, would prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes. Although this proposed rule was expected to be finalized in August 2023, its implementation has been delayed. There has been increasing activity on the state and local levels with respect to scrutiny of menthol and flavored tobacco products. For example, in 2022, the State of California banned tobacco retailers from selling most flavored and menthol tobacco products, including VLN® Menthol King. The state of Massachusetts has similar laws prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco sales, including menthol cigarettes.

Premarket Tobacco Product Application (PMTA)

Certain of our products, including our low nicotine cigarettes, are marketed in the United States pursuant to a PMTA. Under Section 910(b) of the FDCA, a PMTA can be submitted for any new tobacco product seeking a marketing order to enable commercialization of a new tobacco product in the United States. For FDA to grant such an order, the PMTA must enable the FDA to regulatedetermine that: (1) permitting the labeling and marketing of the new tobacco product would be appropriate for the protection of the public health; (2) the methods used in, or the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, or packing of the product conform to the requirements of Section 906(e) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 387f(e)); (3) the product labeling is not false or misleading in any particular; and (4) the product complies with any applicable product standard in effect under section 907 of the FDCA or that there is adequate information to justify a deviation from such standard. In determining whether to authorize a PMTA, FDA considers, among other things:

risks and benefits to the population as a whole, including people who would use the proposed new tobacco product as well as nonusers;
whether people who currently use any tobacco product would be more or less likely to stop using such products if the proposed new tobacco product were available;
whether people who currently do not use any tobacco products would be more or less likely to begin using tobacco products if the new product were available; and
the methods, facilities, and controls used to manufacture, process, and pack the new tobacco product.

Once a PMTA is submitted FDA conducts an initial acceptance review to determine whether the product falls under CTP jurisdiction and to confirm that the statutory and regulatory requirements of an application are met based upon the criteria set forth in the Tobacco Control Act. The FDA endeavors to complete its acceptance review within 21 to 60 days of receipt. If the application does not appear to contain the required information (except for product samples), the FDA may refuse to accept the application for review, and in either case, will notify the applicant. Once accepted for further review, the FDA makes a threshold determination of whether the application contains enough information to permit a substantive review, referred to as “filing,” and may refuse to file any application that does not include sufficient information. Once filed, the FDA intends to complete its review of a PMTA within 180 days of receipt, however the FDA’s review period may be paused or even restarted in response to new information from the applicant, and as such, FDA’s review may take significantly longer than expected. After the FDA completes its review of a PMTA, the FDA may issue a marketing denial order letter, or issue a marketing granted order letter. A marketing granted order becomes effective on the date it is issued in response to a PMTA and permits the new tobacco product to be legally marketed in the United States.

13

A marketing order may include restrictions on the sale and distribution of the product, including restrictions on the access to, and the advertising and promotion of, the tobacco product, and unique requirements for record-keeping and post market reporting, among other things. Holders of authorized PMTAs are, among other things, required to submit detailed periodic and annual reports to the FDA within specified timelines, and are further required to submit reports for serious and unexpected adverse events associated with the product. Once granted the FDA may suspend or withdraw any marketing order on various grounds, such as a determination that the continued marketing of the tobacco product is no longer appropriate for the protection of public health, or where the PMTA holder has failed to comply with applicable post-market requirements.

Modified Risk Tobacco Products which includes(MRTP)

Certain of our products, including our VLN® cigarettes, are marketed in the United States as MRTPs. MRTPs are tobacco products that are sold or distributed for use to reduce harm, or the risk of tobacco-related disease associated with commercially marketed tobacco products. Before an MRTP can be introduced or delivered into interstate commerce in the United States, the FDA must issue a either a “risk modification order” or “exposure modification order” pursuant to the Tobacco Control Act. An order permitting the sale of an MRTP, if granted by the FDA, enables the applicant to utilize certain claims with respect to a single, specific product, not an entire class of tobacco products.

To obtain a risk modification order under the FDCA, an applicant must demonstrate that the product, as it is actually used by consumers, will: (i) significantly reduce harm and the risk of tobacco-related disease to individual tobacco users; and (ii) benefit the health of the population as a whole; taking into account both users of tobacco products and persons who do not currently use tobacco products. To obtain an exposure modification order under the FDCA, an applicant must demonstrate that:

such an order would be appropriate to promote the public health;
any aspect of the label, labeling, and advertising for the product that would cause the product to be a modified risk tobacco product is limited to an explicit or implicit representation that the tobacco product or its smoke does not contain or is free of a substance or contains a reduced level of a substance, or presents a reduced exposure to a substance in tobacco smoke;
scientific evidence is not available and, using the best available scientific methods, cannot be made available without conducting long-term epidemiological studies for an application to meet the standards for obtaining a risk modification order; and
the scientific evidence that is available without conducting long-term epidemiological studies demonstrates that a measurable and substantial reduction in morbidity or mortality among individual tobacco users is reasonably likely in subsequent studies.

Furthermore, for FDA to issue an exposure modification order, FDA must find, among other things, that the applicant has demonstrated that the magnitude of overall reductions in exposure to tobacco toxinsthe substance specified in the application is substantial, that such substance is harmful, that the product as actually used exposes consumers to the specified reduced level of the substance or substances, and (ii)will not expose them to higher levels of other harmful substances similar marketed products, unless such increases are minimal and the reasonably likely to pose lower health risks as compared to conventional cigarettes (“Modified Risk Cigarettes”). On March 30, 2012,overall impact of use of the product remains a substantial and measurable reduction in overall morbidity and mortality among individual tobacco users. Notably the FDA issued Modified Riskalso requires the applicant to demonstrate, through testing of actual consumer perception, that consumers will not be misled into believing that the product is or has been demonstrated to be less harmful or presents less of a risk of disease than other commercially marketed tobacco products.

14

Similar to its review of PMTAs, once an MRTPA is submitted FDA conducts an initial acceptance review to determine whether the product falls under CTP jurisdiction and to confirm that the statutory and regulatory requirements of an application are met based upon the criteria set forth in the Tobacco Product Applications Draft Guidance.Control Act. If the application does not appear to contain the required information, the FDA may refuse to accept the application for review. If and when the MRTP is accepted for further review, the FDA conducts a preliminary scientific review to ensure the application contains the information required for MRTPAs under the FDCA, a process referred to as “filing,” and the FDA may refuse to file any application that does not include the required information. Once filed, the FDA intends to complete its review of the PMTA within 360 days of receipt, however the FDA’s review may take significantly longer. As part of its substantive review, the FDA is required to send the application to the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee (“TPSAC”) and ask the TPSAC to report its recommendations on the application to the FDA within 60 days. After the FDA completes its review of the MRTPA, including the views expressed by the TPSAC, the FDA may issue a modified risk order letter, or issue a no modified risk order letter. If the FDA grants a risk modification order, the applicant must submit protocols for required post market surveillance for FDA concurrence within 30 days after receiving notice that they are required to conduct such surveillance. If the FDA grants an exposure modification order, the applicant must agree to conduct post market surveillance and studies in accordance with a protocol approved by the FDA. In either case, an FDA order permitting marketing of an MRTP is valid only for the fixed time period specified in the order and is not permanent, and such period may not be longer than five years. To continue marketing an MRTP after the set term, the company must submit a new MRTPA for FDA to determine that the product still satisfies the requirements set forth in the Tobacco Control Act.

Environmental Regulations

We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. We have developed specific programs across our business units for ensuring high standards of environmental compliance, including, standard operating practices and procedures at our manufacturing facility as well at our research and development centers. We believe that ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes will qualify as Modified Risk Cigarettes. manufacturing facility complies with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

In addition, the Tobacco Control Act allowsany new products introduced by us are subject to a comprehensive environmental assessment by an independent third-party expert, including an assessment of how such products may create environmental risks. For our PMTA product, the FDA to mandate the use of reduced risk technologies in conventional tobacco products and cigarettes which could create opportunities for us to license our proprietary technology and/or our tobaccos to larger competitors.

We supply our proprietary cigarettes for use by independent researchers so studies can be conducted to obtain additional informationprepared a programmatic environmental assessment (PEA), based on our products. We expect this information will assist us, along with our own funded studies, in obtaining the necessary FDA authorizations to marketBRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette.

Hemp

The Agricultural Act of 2014, which became law on February 7, 2014, is also known as the Farm Bill. Section 7606 of this federal statute, titled “Legitimacy of Industrial Hemp Research,” gave authorization to state departments of agriculture and institutions of higher learning in states that have legalized hemp cultivation to grow the crop for research and pilot programs. Since the implementation of the Farm Bill, more than 30 states have passed laws regarding industrial hemp.

On August 12, 2016, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) publicly issued, with the concurrence of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) and the FDA, the followingStatement of Principles on Industrial Hemp to inform the public how federal law applies to activities associated with industrial hemp that is grown and cultivatedsubmitted data in accordance with Section 7606the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508) implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and FDA’s NEPA regulations (21 CFR 25.40). The PEA concluded that the marketing orders would have no significant impact and that environmental impact statements would not be required.

Excise Taxes

Tobacco products are subject to substantial excise taxes in the U.S. and other countries. Significant increases in tobacco-related taxes or fees have been proposed or enacted and are likely to continue to be proposed or enacted at the federal, state and local levels within the U.S. and other countries. The frequency and magnitude of excise tax increases can be influenced by various factors, including the Agricultural Actcomposition of 2014:executive and legislative bodies. Federal, state and local cigarette excise taxes have increased substantially over the past two decades. Tax increases have an adverse impact on sales of tobacco products.

Competition

Section 7606Although our products are not approved as smoking cessation aids, we believe that our RNC tobacco cigarettes may compete with FDA-approved smoking cessation aids. In the market for FDA-approved smoking cessation aids, principal competitors would include Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Perrigo Company plc, Novartis International AG, and Niconovum AB, a subsidiary of Reynolds American Inc. The industry consists of major domestic and international companies, most of which have existing relationships in the Agricultural Act of 2014 legalized the growing and cultivating of industrial hemp for research purposes in States where such growth and cultivation is legal under State law, notwithstanding existing federal statutes that would otherwise criminalize such conduct. The statutorily sanctioned conduct, however, was limitedmarkets into which we plan to growth and cultivation by an institution of higher education or State department of agriculture for purposes of agricultural or other academic research or under the auspices of a State agricultural pilot program for the growth, cultivation, or marketing of industrial hemp.

Section 7606 authorized State departments of agriculture to promulgate regulations to carry out these pilot programs but did not provide a specific delegation to the USDA or any other agency to implement the program. As well, the statute left open many questions regarding the continuing application of federal drug control statutes to the growth, cultivation, manufacture, and distribution of industrial hemp products,sell, as well as the extent to which growth by private partiesfinancial, technical, marketing, sales, manufacturing, scaling capacity, distribution and sale of industrial hemp products are permissible. Section 7606 did not remove industrial hemp from the controlled substances list. Therefore, federal law continues to restrict hemp-related activities, to the extent that those activities have not been legalized under section 7606.

USDA, having consulted withother resources, and received concurrence from the DEA and the FDA, therefore, is issuing this statement of principles to inform the public regarding how federal law applies to activities involving industrial hemp so that individuals, institutions, and States that wish to participate in industrial hemp agricultural pilot programs can do so in accordance with Federal law.

·The growth and cultivation of industrial hemp may only take place in accordance with an agricultural pilot program to study the growth, cultivation, or marketing of industrial hemp established by a State department of agriculture or State agency responsible for agriculture in a State where the production of industrial hemp is otherwise legal under State law.
·The State agricultural pilot program must provide for State registration and certification of sites used for growing or cultivating industrial hemp. Although registration and certification is not further defined, it is recommended that such registration should include the name of the authorized manufacturer, the period of licensure or other time period during which such person is authorized by the State to manufacture industrial hemp, and the location, including Global Positioning System coordinates, where such person is authorized to manufacture industrial hemp.
·Only State departments of agriculture, and persons licensed, registered, or otherwise authorized by them to conduct research under an agricultural pilot program in accordance with Section 7606, and institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)), or persons employed by or under a production contract or lease with them to conduct such research, may grow or cultivate industrial hemp as part of the agricultural pilot program.
·The term “industrial hemp” includes the plantCannabis sativa L. and any part or derivative of such plant, including seeds of such plant, whether growing or not, that is used exclusively for industrial purposes (fiber and seed) with a tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3% on a dry weight basis. The term “tetrahydrocannabinols” includes all isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers of tetrahydrocannabinols.
·For purposes of marketing research by institutions of higher education or State departments of agriculture (including distribution of marketing materials), but not for the purpose of general commercial activity, industrial hemp products may be sold in a State with an agricultural pilot program or among States with agricultural pilot programs but may not be sold in States where such sale is prohibited. Industrial hemp plants and seeds may not be transported across State lines.
·Section 7606 specifically authorized certain entities to “grow or cultivate” industrial hemp but did not eliminate the requirement under the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act that the importation of viable cannabis seeds must be carried out by persons registered with the DEA to do so. In addition, any USDA phytosanitary requirements that normally would apply to the importation of plant material will apply to the importation of industrial hemp seed.
·Section 7606 did not amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. For example, section 7606 did not alter the approval process for new drug applications, the requirements for the conduct of clinical or nonclinical research, the oversight of marketing claims, or any other authorities of the FDA as they are set forth in that Act.
·The Federal Government does not construe Section 7606 to alter the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that apply to the manufacture, distribution, and dispensing of drug products containing controlled substances. Manufacturers, distributors, dispensers of drug products derived from cannabis plants, as well as those conducting research with such drug products, must continue to adhere to the CSA requirements.
·Institutions of higher education and other participants authorized to carry out agricultural pilot programs under Section 7606 may be able to participate in USDA research or other programs to the extent otherwise eligible for participation in those programs.

16

Competition

We are not aware of any competition to our Company in the creation and provision of tobacco research cigarettes with Very Low Nicotine content for use in independent clinical studies. Since 2011, we have provided morename recognition substantially greater than 24 million research cigarettes containing our proprietary tobaccos, including our Very Low Nicotine content tobacco, for use in numerous independent clinical studies at many well-known study locations, with agencies of the United States federal government investing more than $100 million in such independent clinical studies. The results of those independent clinical studies have been published in peer-reviewed publications. We are not aware of any other independent clinical studies that have been published regarding any other tobacco research cigarette with Very Low Nicotine content.

The results of such numerous completed and on-going clinical studies provide independent scientific support for the public announcement on July 28, 2017 by the FDA that the FDA plans to mandate that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States will be required to contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine. Since our proprietary VLN tobacco has been the subject of numerous completed and on-going, independent clinical studies paid for by agencies of the federal government, we are investigating the potential use of our VLN tobacco in our own products that will be intended to comply with the new FDA regulations, as well as we are investigating the potential license of the use of our VLN tobacco by third-parties. It is possible that other companies may develop products that also comply with the new FDA regulations in ways that we do not know of at this time since the FDA is still in the rule-making process. There is also no assurance that the FDA will actually implement such regulations on a timely basis or at all.ours. We are also investigating potential opportunities relatingaware that several domestic cigarette companies and other research groups are working to our VLNresearch and grow reduced nicotine tobacco outsideand have filed patent applications.

15

Cigarette and our VLN tobacco inside or outside of the United States.

As of December 31, 2017, we no longer sell any commercial cigarettes in the United States. During the year of 2017, we had not yet ceased the selling of ourRED SUN brand and we continued manufacturing a third-party MSA cigarette brand for the third-party owner of that brand. Cigarettefiltered cigar companies compete primarily on the basis of product quality, brand recognition, brand loyalty, taste, innovation, packaging, service, marketing, advertising, retail shelf space, and price. Cigarette sales can be significantly influenced by weak economic conditions, erosion of consumer confidence, competitors’ introduction of low-price products or innovative products, higher taxes, higher absolute prices and larger gaps between price categories, and product regulation that diminishes the ability to differentiate tobacco products. Domestic cigarette competitors included Philip Morris USA Inc., Reynolds American Inc., Lorillard Inc., CommonwealthITG Brands, Inc., Liggett Group LLC, and Vector Tobacco Inc.Group Ltd. International competitors included Philip Morris International Inc., British American Tobacco, JT International SA, Imperial Tobacco Group PLCBrands plc, and regional and local tobacco companies; and in some instances, government-owned tobacco enterprises such as the China National Tobacco Corporation.

In the event the FDA approves our MRTP application forBRAND A, then it is possible that BRAND A may compete with FDA-approved smoking cessation aids. In the market for FDA-approved smoking cessation aids, our principal competitors would include Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Novartis International AG, and Niconovum AB, a subsidiary of Reynolds American Inc. The industry consists of major domestic and international companies, most of which have existing relationships in the markets into which we plan to sell, as well as financial, technical, marketing, sales, manufacturing, scaling capacity, distribution and other resources, and name recognition substantially greater than ours.

Employees

Human Capital Resources

As of February 23, 2018,December 31, 2023, we employed seventy-nine (79) peoplehad 64 employees. All employees are located in the United States. Our human capital resource objectives are designed to attract, and retain, highly motivated and well-qualified employees. We believe that we consider our employee relationsoffer a competitive compensation package and have also worked diligently to be good.

provide a flexible and safe work environment.

Corporate Information

22nd Century Group, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on September 12, 2005 under the name Touchstone Mining Limited. On January 25, 2011, we entered into a reverse merger transaction with 22nd Century Limited, LLC, which we refer to herein as the “merger.” Upon the closing of the merger, 22nd Century Limited, LLC became our wholly-owned subsidiary. After the merger, we succeeded to the business of 22nd Century Limited, LLC as our sole line of business.

22nd Century Limited, LLC was originally formed as a New York limited liability company on February 20, 1998 as 21st Century Limited, LLC and subsequently merged with a newly-formed Delaware limited liability company, 22nd Century Limited, LLC, on November 29, 1999.

We are a Nevada corporation, and our corporate headquarters is located at 8560 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221 (our former address was 9530 Main Street, Clarence, New York 14031).321 Farmington Road, Mocksville, North Carolina 27028. Our telephone number is (716) 270-1523. Our internet address is www.xxiicentury.com. All of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K can be accessed free of charge through our website promptly after filing; however, in the event that the website is inaccessible, we will provide paper copies of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, the most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Current Reports filed or furnished on Form 8-K, and all related amendments, excluding exhibits, free of charge upon request. These filings are also accessible on the SEC'sSEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We do not incorporate the information on our website into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K and our web site address is included as an inactive textual reference only.

17

16

Table of Contents

Item 1A.
Risk Factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below and in other reports that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The matters discussed in the risk factors, and additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and future growth prospects and could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.

Risks Related to Our Business and Operations

We have had a history of losses, and we may be unableexpect to achieveincur significant expenses and sustain profitability.continuing losses for the foreseeable future and there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have experienced netincurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and expect to incur additional losses until such time that we can generate significant revenue and profit in our tobacco business, which casts substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As of approximately $13.0 million, $11.6 million and $11.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. While our current balance ofMarch 25, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities is adequate to sustain operations for a number of years, generating net income in the future will depend onapproximately $2.2 million.

Doubts about our ability to successfully operatecontinue as a going concern have and could continue to negatively impact our cigarette manufacturing facility, sell and marketrelationships with our proprietary tobacco products, and generate royalty revenue from the licensing of our intellectual property. There is no guarantee that we will be able to achieve or sustain profitability in the future. An inability to successfully achieve profitability may decrease our long-term viability.

We have had a history of negative cash flow,commercial partners and our ability, as part of our cost-cutting measures, to sustain positive cash flow is uncertain.

We have had a history of negative cash flow from operating activities, before cash used in investing activities and cash provided by financing activities, including approximately $12.1 million of negative cash flow from operations during the year ended December 31, 2017. We believeobtain, maintain, restructure and/or terminate agreements with them, or negatively impact our current position of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities is adequate to sustain operations and to meet all current obligations as they come due for a number of years. Generation of positive cash flow from operations will depend on our ability to successfully implement the net income generating activities discussed in the previous risk factor discussion. An inability to successfully implement our net income producing initiatives may decrease our long-term viability.

If regulations by the FDA requiring the reduction of nicotine to minimally or non-addictive levels in all cigarettes sold in the U.S. are delayed or do not become implemented, then the demand for our proprietary Very Low Nicotine tobacco may not substantially increase in the U.S.

On July 28, 2017, the FDA publicly announced that it intends to implement new regulations that will mandate minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine in all cigarettes sold in the U.S. However, there can be no assurance that the FDA will implementnegotiating leverage with such new regulations or, if implemented, when such regulations would take effect. In the event the FDA does not implement such new regulations or implementation is delayed, then the demand for our proprietary Very Low Nicotine tobacco may not substantially increase in the U.S. and such action wouldparties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operations.

If we fail to obtain FDA and foreign regulatory approvals for authorization to market BRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette, we will be unable to commercialize this potential productresults of operations or result in and outside the U.S.

There can be no assurance thatBRAND A will be approved by the FDA and/litigation. Furthermore, any loss of key personnel, employee attrition or by foreign regulators to be marketed as a Modified Risk Cigarette. In addition, there can be no assurance that all necessary approvals will be granted for our potential products or that review or actions will not involve delays caused by requests for additional information or testing that could adversely affect the time and cost to market and sell our potential products.

18

The development, testing, manufacturing, and marketingmaterial erosion of our potential products are subject to extensive regulation by governmental authorities in the United States and throughout the world. In particular, the processemployee morale arising out of obtaining approvals by the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) and other international FDA equivalent agencies in targeted countries is costly and time consuming, and the time required for such approvals is uncertain. OurBRAND A must undergo an extensive regulatory approval process mandated by the FDA in the U.S. and any other approval processes required by FDA-equivalent agencies in foreign countries where we want to introduce our potential products.

The scope of review, including product testing and exposure studies, to be required by the FDA under the Tobacco Control Act in order for cigarettes such asBRAND A to be marketed as Modified Risk Cigarettes has not yet been fully established, even though the FDA issuedModified Risk Tobacco Product Applications Draft Guidance on March 30, 2012. Our first application forBRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette experienced delays and took a year to obtain substantial feedback from the FDA. We may be unsuccessful in establishing to the satisfaction of the FDA thatBRAND A is a Modified Risk Cigarette. Even upon demonstrating significant reduced exposure to nicotine, the FDA may decide that allowing a modified risk claim is not in the best interest of the public health, and the FDA may not allow us to market ourBRAND A cigarettes as Modified Risk Cigarettes. In addition, the time and cost involved in obtaining such approvals may be longer and more costly than anticipated.

The FDA could force the removal of our products from the U.S. market.

The FDA has broad authority over the regulation of tobacco products. The FDA could, among other things, force us to remove from the U.S. market ourBRAND A even after FDA authorization to marketBRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette, levy fines or change their regulations on advertising. Any adverse action by the FDA could have a material adverse impact on our business. 

We intend to distribute and sell our potential products outside of the U.S., which will subject us to other regulatory risks.

In addition to seeking approval from the FDA to market ourBRAND A as a Modified Risk Cigarette in the U.S., we intend to seek governmental approvals required to marketBRAND A and our other products in other countries. Marketing of our products is not permitted in certain countries until we have obtained required approvals or exemptions in these individual countries. The regulatory review process varies from country to country, and approval by foreign governmental authorities is unpredictable, uncertain, and generally expensive. Our ability to market our potential products could be substantially limited due to delays in receipt of, or failure to receive, the necessary approvals or clearances. We anticipate commencing the applications required in some or all of these countries following approval by the FDA; however, we may decide to file applications in advance of the FDA approval if we determine such filings to be both time and cost effective. If we export any of our potential products, or products that have not yet been cleared for commercial distribution in the U.S., then such products may be subject to FDA export restrictions. Failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals could impairdoubts about our ability to generate revenue from international sources.

Our studies and testing of any of our potential products may produce negative or inconclusive results and we may decide, or regulators may require us, to conduct additional studies and/or testing for these potential products or cease our studies and testing.

We do not know whether further studies and testing of our potential products will demonstrate safety and efficacy sufficient to result in marketable products. We may not be able to obtain approval or marketing authorization for these potential products or our anticipated time of bringing these potential products to the market may be substantially delayed. We may also experience significant additional development costs and be required to undertake additional studies and/or testing if we change our potential products. Any such delays or costsoperate as a going concern could have a material adverse effect on our business.

19

Our working capital requirements involve estimates basedability to effectively conduct our business, and could impair our ability to execute our business plan, thereby having a material adverse effect on demand expectationsour business, financial condition and may increase beyond those currently anticipated, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.of operations.

 

We have no experience in selling Modified Risk Cigarettes or smoking cessation products on a commercial basis. As a result, we intendneed additional funding to base our funding and inventory decisions on estimates of future demand. If demand for our products does not increase as quickly as we have estimated, our inventory and expenses could rise, andexecute our business plan and operating results could suffer. Alternatively, if we experience salesto continue operations even with the proceeds from recent warrant inducement and exchange concluded in excess of our estimates, our working capital needs may be higher than those currently anticipated. Our abilityFebruary 2024. We continue to meet any demand for our products may depend on our abilityseek and evaluate opportunities to arrange for additional financing for any ongoing working capital shortages, since it is likely that cash flow from sales will lag behind our investment requirements.

We may require additional capital before we can complete the FDA authorization process for our Modified Risk Cigarettes.

We may require additional capital in the future before we can complete the FDA authorization process for our Modified Risk Cigarettes. The cost of completing the FDA authorization process for potential Modified Risk Cigarettes is difficult to estimate since it is currently unknown exactly what the FDA will require. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equityour securities, to complete the FDA authorization process for our Modified Risk Cigarettes, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution, or the equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds through debt financings, these financings may involve significant cash payment obligationsasset sales, and covenants that restrict our ability to operate our business and make distributions to our stockholders. We could also wait for our own revenues and profits to be sufficient for us to provide such funding, which could delay our completion of the FDA authorization process for our Modified Risk Cigarettes. We also could elect to seek funds through arrangements with collaboratorsstrategic partners. If capital is not available to us when, and in the amounts needed, we could be required to liquidate our inventory and assets, cease or licensees. To the extentcurtail operations, or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or similar state proceedings. There can be no assurance that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies or our potential products or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.

If we cannot raise additional capital on acceptable terms, we may notwill be able to among other things:raise the capital we need to continue our operations. Without additional capital, we will be unable to continue our operations in the future.

·undertake the steps necessary to seek FDA authorization of our Modified Risk Cigarettes;

·develop or enhance our potential products or introduce new products;

·expand our development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative activities;

·attract tobacco growers, customers, or manufacturing and distribution partners;

·acquire complementary technologies, products, or businesses;

·expand our operations in the United States or internationally;

·hire, train, and retain employees; or

·respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements.

We have no experience in managing growth. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, we may be unable to executecomply with the covenants in our business plan or to address competitive challenges adequately.senior secured debentures.

 

From 2013Our senior secured debentures contain customary representations, warranties and covenants including among other things and subject to 2017,certain exceptions, covenants that restrict us from incurring additional indebtedness, creating or permitting liens on assets, making or holding any investments, repaying outstanding indebtedness, paying dividends or distributions and entering into transactions with affiliates. We are also required to maintain certain quarterly revenue targets.

As a result of these covenants, our ability to respond to changes in business and economic conditions and engage in beneficial transactions, including to obtain additional financing as needed, may be restricted. Furthermore, our failure to comply with the covenants could result in a default under such agreements, which could permit the debt holders to accelerate our obligation to repay the debt. Although we grew from nine (9) employeesrecently received a waiver with respect to seventy-nine (79) employees. Any growth in our businesscompliance with such covenants, there is no assurance that we will placebe able to secure a significant strain onsimilar waiver for the failure to comply with any future covenants. If any of our managerial, administrative, operational, financial, information technology and other resources. We intenddebt is accelerated, we likely would not have sufficient funds available to further expandrepay it. Substantially all of our overall business, customer base, employees and operations, which will require substantial management effort and significant additional investment in our infrastructure. We willassets, including intellectual property, are collateralized under the debentures. If such debt is accelerated, we could be required to liquidate our inventory, cease or curtail operations, or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or similar state proceedings.

17

Additionally, the senior secured debentures may be converted into shares of the Company’s common stock on the earlier of (i) June 30, 2024 and (ii) the public announcement of a Fundamental Transaction (as defined in the senior secured debentures). If the senior secured debentures are converted into common stock in whole or in part, the existing stockholders could incur significant dilution in their relative percentage ownership. The prospect of this possible dilution may also impact the price of our common stock.

We could continue to improve our operational, financialincur restructuring and management controlsimpairment charges as we continue to pursue a cost cutting initiative and our reporting procedures and we may not be able to do so effectively. As such, we may be unable to manage our growth effectively.

20

We have limited experience in operating and managing a manufacturing facility.pursue strategic alternatives.

 

We have limited experience operating and managing a manufacturing facility. The manufacture of products is subjectcontinue to strict quality control, testing, and record keeping requirements, and continuing obligations regardingevaluate opportunities to optimize the submission of safety reports and other post-market information. In addition, the manufacturingcost structure of our own products will be expensiveoperations in order to operate without sufficient production volume. If we are unableimplement a cost savings initiative. The actions driven from these opportunities could result in significant charges which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Future actions could result in restructuring and related charges, including but not limited to successfully manufacture or sell our products, we will still be liable for theimpairments and employee termination costs and costs associated with terminating contracts that could be significant. We have incurred significant impairment charges for long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible assets, which are subject to periodic impairment analysis and review, and remain subject to the potential for additional charges. Identifying and assessing whether impairment indicators exist, or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred, including market conditions, operating a manufacturing facility. Accordingly,results, competition and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment. Any of the operation of such manufacturing facilityabove future actions could result in charges that could have a materialan adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our manufacturing facility is subject The cost-cutting initiatives have led, and may continue to FDA regulations.

Manufacturers of tobacco products must comply with FDA regulations which require, among other things, compliance with the FDA’s evolving regulations on Current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP(s)”), which are enforcedlead, to legal claims by the FDA through its facilities inspection program. The manufacture of products is subject to strict quality control, testing and record keeping requirements, and continuing obligations regarding the submission of safety reportsservice providers and other post-market information. We cannot guarantee thatthird-parties. Any resulting litigation could be costly and time consuming and an unfavorable outcome could have a significant adverse effect on our current manufacturing facility will pass FDA inspections and/or similar inspections in foreign countries to produce our tobacco products, or that future changes to cGMP manufacturing standards will not also negatively affect the cost or sustainability of our manufacturing facility.business.

Our principal competitors in the smoking cessation marketgenerally have, and any future competitors may have, greater financial resources and marketing resourcesname recognition than we do, and they may therefore develop products or other technologies similar or superior to ours, or otherwise compete more successfully than we do.

We are competing with large tobacco companies and large pharmaceutical companies that have no experience in selling smoking cessation products. Competition in the smoking cessation aid products industry is intense, and we may not be able to successfully compete in the market. In the market for FDA-approved smoking cessation aids, our principal competitors include Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Perrigo Company plc and Novartis International AG.greater resources that us. The tobacco industry consists of major domestic and international companies, most of which have existing relationships in the markets in which we plan to sell, as well as financial, technical, research and development, marketing, sales, manufacturing, scaling capacity, distribution, lobbying and other resources and name recognition substantially greater than ours. In addition, we expect new competitors will enter the markets for oursimilar tobacco products in the future. future and the nature and extent of this market entrance cannot be quantified at this time.

Potential customers may choose to do business with our more established competitors because of their perception that our competitors are more stable, are more likely to complete various projects, can scale operations more quickly, have greater manufacturing capacity, are more likely to continue as a going concern,have robust marketing and sale programs and lend greater credibility to any joint venture.governmental regulators and others. In addition, large companies have the ability to provide entry-level pricing for premium products in order make us less competitive. If we are unable to compete successfully against manufacturers of other smoking cessation products,larger companies with more financial resources and name recognition, our business could suffer, and we could lose orprospects would be unable to obtain market share.materially adversely affected.

Our competitors may develop products that are less expensive, safer or otherwise more appealing, which may diminish or eliminate the commercial success of our VLN® cigarettes or any other potential productproducts that we may commercialize.

If our competitors marketdevelop very low nicotine tobacco without infringing on our intellectual property or other products that are less expensive, safer or otherwise more appealing than our RNC cigarettes or any of our other potential products, or that reach the market before our potential products,ours, we may not achieve commercial success. The market may choose to continue utilizing existingCurrently, there are numerous companies developing products for any numberwhich they may submit MRTPAs, working to develop low nicotine tobacco and other tobacco alternative products to provide products that are potentially safer for human consumption or to otherwise assist consumers to cease or begin to switch from smoking. If one of reasons, including familiarity withsuch competitors develops a cigarette that is safe for human consumption, a safer alternative for nicotine that is widely accepted, superior low nicotine tobacco or pricing

18

otherwise develops a superior quitting method, it could render our Modified Risk Tobacco Product to compete with products marketed by our competitors would impair our ability to generate revenue,RNC tobacco and cigarettes obsolete, which would have a material adverse effectimpact on our future business financial condition, results ofand operations and cash flows. Our competitors may:

·develop and market products that are less expensive, safer, or otherwise more appealing than our products;

·commercialize competing products before we or our partners can launch our products; and

21

·initiate or withstand substantial price competition more successfully than we can.

If we failour ability to stay at the forefront of technological change, we may be unable to compete effectively.

achieve profitability.

Our competitors may render our technologies obsolete by advances in existing technological approaches or the development of new or different approaches, potentially eliminating the advantages that we believe we derive from our research approach and proprietary technologies.

Our competitors may:

·develop and market similar or new products that are less expensive, safer, or otherwise more appealing than our products;
develop similar or new technologies and products that render our products obsolete;
operate larger research and development programs or have substantially greater financial resources than we do;

·have greater success in recruiting skilled technical and scientific workers from the limited pool of available talent;

·more effectively negotiate third-party licenses and strategic relationships; and

·commercialize competing products before we or our partners can launch our products;
be more effective in marketing and creating brand awareness of their products that we are;
develop tobacco with superior traits to ours;
initiate or withstand substantial price competition more successfully than we can; and/or
take advantage of acquisition or other opportunities more readily than we can.

Government mandated prices, production control programs, shiftsOur research and development process may not develop marketable products cost-effectively or at all, which would result in crops driven by economic conditions, and adverse weather patterns may increase the cost or reduce the quality of the tobacco and other agricultural products used to manufacture our products.

We depend on independent tobacco farmers to grow our specialty proprietary tobaccos with specific nicotine contents for our potential products. As with other agricultural commodities, the price of tobacco leaf can be influenced by imbalances in supply and demand, and crop quality can be influenced by variations in weather patterns, diseases, and pests. We must also compete with other tobacco companies for contract production with independent tobacco farmers. Tobacco production in certain countries is subject to a variety of controls, including government mandated prices and production control programs. Changes in the patterns of demand for agricultural products could cause farmers to plant less tobacco. Any significant change in tobacco leaf prices, quality and quantity could affect our profitability and our business.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key personnel.

Our success will depend to a significant extent on the continued servicesloss of our senior management team, and in particular Henry Sicignano III, our President and Chief Executive Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, our Chief Financial Officer, Dr. James Swauger, our Senior Vice President of Science and Regulatory Affairs, and Thomas L. James, our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. The loss or unavailability of any of these individuals may significantly delay or prevent the development of our potential products and other business objectives by diverting management’s attention to transition matters. While each of these individuals is party to employment agreements with us, they could terminate their relationships with us at any time, and we may be unable to enforce any applicable employment or non-compete agreements.investment into such process.

We also rely on consultants and advisors to assist us in formulatingdo not know whether our research and development manufacturing, distribution, marketing, and sales strategies. All of our consultants and advisors are either self-employed or employed by other organizations, and theyprocess will result in marketable products. Even if we develop marketable products, we may have conflicts of interest or other commitments, such as consulting or advisory contracts with other organizations, that may affect their ability to contribute to us.

Product liability claims, product recalls or other claims could cause us to incur losses or damage our reputation.

The risk of product liability claims or product recalls, and associated adverse publicity, is inherent in the development, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of tobacco and smoking cessation products. We do not currently have product liability insurance for our products or our potential products and do not expect to be able to obtain product liability insurance at reasonable commercial ratesthe necessary marketing authorizations for these products.potential products or our anticipated time of bringing these potential products to the market may be substantially delayed. The development of new products is costly, time-consuming, and has no guarantee of success. Any product recallsuch delays or lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages maythe inability to effectively develop new products in a cost-effective manner, or at all, would have a material adverse effect on our business and a loss of our financial resources.

We have in the past invested in other companies and may do so in the future, which may divert our management’s attention, result in additional dilution to our stockholders, and consume resources that are necessary to sustain our business or result in losses.

We may acquire or invest in complementary solutions, services, technologies, or businesses in the future. We may also enter into relationships with other businesses to expand our intellectual property portfolio, which could involve preferred or exclusive licenses or investments in other companies. Negotiating these transactions can be time-consuming, difficult and expensive, and our ability to complete these transactions may often be subject to conditions or approvals that are beyond our control. Consequently, these transactions, even if undertaken and announced, may not close or may not yield the benefits that we expect. Many of our acquisitions in the past have not yielded the results or synergies that we anticipated. In addition, we may only be able to conduct limited due diligence on an acquired company’s operations. Following an acquisition, we may be subject to liabilities arising from an acquired company’s past or present operations and these liabilities may be greater than the warranty and indemnity limitations that we negotiate. Any liability that is greater than these warranty and indemnity limitations could have a negative impact on our financial condition.

19

Acquisitions may also disrupt our business, divert our resources, and require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for the development of our business. Moreover, the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, investment, or business relationship may not be realized or we may be exposed to unknown liabilities, including litigation against the companies that we may acquire.

The failure of our information systems to function as intended or their penetration by outside parties with the intent to corrupt them could result in business disruption, litigation and regulatory action, and loss of revenue, assets, or personal or confidential data (cybersecurity).

We use information systems to help manage business processes, collect and interpret business data and communicate internally and externally with employees, suppliers, customers and others. Some of these information systems are managed by third-party service providers. We have backup systems and business continuity plans in place, and we take care to protect our systems and data from unauthorized access. However, a failure of our systems to function as intended, or penetration of our systems by outside parties intent on extracting or corrupting information or otherwise disrupting business processes, could interrupt our business and place us at a competitive disadvantage, result in a loss of revenue, assets or personal or other sensitive data, litigation and regulatory action, cause damage to our reputation and that of our brands and result in significant remediation and other costs. Any cybersecurity incident could cause substantial harm to our business and result in regulatory action, fines, and/or substantial costs.

Business interruptions, whether caused by natural disaster, terrorism, economic downturns, global pandemics or other events, could negatively impact our business.

A successful product liability claimnatural disaster (such as an earthquake, hurricane, fire, or flood), pandemics, widespread power outage or internet failure or hack, or an act of terrorism could cause substantial delays in our operations, damage or destroy our equipment or facilities, and cause us to incur additional expenses and lose revenue. The insurance we maintain against us couldnatural disasters may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case, which would require us to payexpend significant resources to replace any destroyed assets, thereby materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and prospects. Other global incidents could have a substantial monetary award. Thoughsimilar effect of disrupting our business to the extent they reach and impact the areas in which we currentlyoperate, the availability of inventory we need, the customers we serve, the partners on whom we rely for products or services or the employees who operate our businesses. For example, another pandemic or comparable heath concern could disrupt our supply chain for tobacco, as well as negatively impact employee productivity, including affecting the availability of employees reporting for work. Any business interruption caused by such unforeseen events could have no pending product liability claims against us, we cannot assure you that such claims will not be made in the future.a material adverse impact on our business and operations.

22

Negative press from beingOur prior operations in the hemp/cannabis space could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We previously operated in the cannabis space. The hemp plant and the cannabis/marijuana plant are both part of the samecannabis sativa genus/speciesgenus of plant, except that hemp, by definition, has lessnot more than 0.3% THC content and is legal under the federal 2018 Farm Bill and certain state laws, but the same plant with a higher THC content is cannabis/defined as marijuana, which is legal under certain state laws, but which is not legal under federal law. The similarities between these plants can cause confusion, and our previous activities with legal hemp may be incorrectly perceived as us beinghaving been involved in federally illegal cannabis/marijuana. Also, despite growing support for the cannabis/marijuana industry and legalization of cannabis/marijuana in certain U.S. states, many individuals and businesses remain opposed to the cannabis/marijuana industry. Any negative pressnegativity resulting from any incorrect perception that we have entered into the cannabis/marijuana spaceour prior cannabis operations could result in a loss of current or future business. It could also adversely affect the public’s perception of us and lead to reluctance by new parties to do business with us or to own our common stock. We cannot assure you that additional business partners, including but not limited to financial institutions, banking institutions and customers, will not attempt to end or curtail their relationships with us. Any such negative press or cessation of business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

20

Any business-related cannabinoid production is dependent on laws pertaining to the hemp/cannabis industry.

AsTable of December 31, 2017, there were (i) 34 states in the United States and the District of Columbia that have legalized hemp, (ii) 29 states and the District of Columbia that allow their citizens to use medical cannabis/marijuana and, (iii) 9 states and the District of Columbia that have legalized cannabis/marijuana for adult recreational use. Many other states are considering similar legislation. Conversely, under the federal Controlled Substance Act (the “CSA”), the policies and regulations of the federal government and its agencies are that cannabis/marijuana has no medical benefit and a range of activities are prohibited, including cultivation, possession, personal use, and interstate distribution of cannabis/marijuana. In the event the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) begins strict enforcement of the CSA in states that have laws legalizing medical and/or adult recreational cannabis/marijuana, there may be a direct and adverse impact to any future business or prospects that we may have in the cannabis/marijuana business. Even in those jurisdictions in which the manufacture and use of medical cannabis/marijuana has been legalized at the state level, the possession, use, and cultivation of cannabis/marijuana all remain violations of federal law that are punishable by imprisonment and substantial fines. Moreover, individuals and entities may violate federal law if they intentionally aid and abet another in violating these federal controlled substance laws, or conspire with another to violate them.Contents

We currently conduct sponsored research on hemp through Anandia Laboratories in Canada and through sponsored research on hemp in Virginia through the University of Virginia (“UVA”), in each case with Anandia and UVA possessing all necessary permits and licenses to engage legally in such activities. In order to carry out research in other countries, similar licenses are required to be issued by the relevant authority in each country.

Local, state, federal, and international hemp and cannabis/marijuana laws and regulations are broad in scope and subject to evolving interpretations, which could require us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance requirements. In addition, violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, it is possible that regulations may be enacted in the future that will be directly applicable to our proposed business regarding cannabinoid production. It is also possible that the federal government will begin strictly enforcing existing laws, which may limit the legal uses of the hemp plant and its derivatives and extracts, such as cannabinoids. However, our work in hemp would continue since hemp research, development, and commercialization activities are permitted under applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations, or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative policies and procedures, when and if promulgated, could have on our activities in the legal hemp industry.

23

Risks Related to the Tobacco Industry

The third-party tobacco products madeWe may be unsuccessful in our manufacturing business face significant governmental action aimed at increasing regulatory requirementsefforts to commercialize our RNC tobacco using the reduced exposure claims authorized by the FDA.

While the FDA issued an exposure modification order in connection with our MRTPA and we have been commercializing our VLN® cigarettes in select markets across the United States, there are no guarantees regarding the commercial viability of our RNC tobacco cigarettes. To date, there has never been a comparable product sold in the marketplace and we have only commercialized the cigarettes on a limited basis. We have obtained an exposure modification order for our VLN® cigarettes, which enables us to make certain claims regarding the reduction of nicotine within these products. Specifically, we are permitted to market the products with the goalclaims “95% less nicotine,” “helps reduce your nicotine consumption,” and “greatly reduces your nicotine consumption,” and we are required to use the claim “helps you smoke less” in connection with the other authorized claims; we may not market our VLN cigarettes for claims that have not been authorized pursuant to an FDA order. Although we believe these claims have the potential to increase our product sales, these products may never achieve consumer acceptance at levels that make the product commercially viable for profitable sales. In addition, the process of significantly restrictingcommercializing such product and creating consumer awareness could take longer and cost more than we expect.

In addition, even if we believe that certain legislative or regulatory changes may increase product demand, such as the useproposals that FDA has historically made with respect to requiring minimally or non-addictive levels of tobacco products.

We publicly announced that we discontinued U.S. sales of ourRED SUN brand cigarettes as of December 31, 2017,nicotine in preparation for the planned mandate by the FDA that all cigarettes sold in the United States willU.S., there can be required to contain only minimallyno assurance that such regulations, if implemented, would increase or non-addictive levels of nicotine. However, most of the remaining revenuescreate demand for our RNC cigarettes.

The commercial success of our RNC tobacco cigarettes will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited to our ability to:

achieve, maintain and grow market identify of, acceptance of, and demand for, such products;
successfully create consumer awareness of such products;
market the product with the phrase “Helps You Smoke Less” and any other required warnings or statements;
maintain, manage or scale the necessary sales, marketing, manufacturing and other capabilities and infrastructure that are required to successfully commercialize such products;
grow or otherwise maintain an adequate supply of RNC tobacco;
maintain and extend intellectual property protection for such products;
comply with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, including FDA and MSA regulations or requirements with respect to product advertising and our obligations in connection with our PMTAs and MRTPs;
competitively price our products;
compete with other similar products or new technologies (if any);
obtain cost-effective distribution outlets; and
effectively sell our products into established markets where there is substantial market dominance by large tobacco enterprises.

If we are unsuccessful in commercializing our RNC tobacco cigarettes, or such commercialization takes longer or costs more than we currently expect, our financial results, business and future prospects would be materially adversely effected.

21

We have limited experience marketing and selling Modified Exposure Cigarettes and our working capital and inventory estimates based on demand expectations may be incorrect, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.

While members of management and our board of directors are experienced in the selling of conventional cigarette and other consumer products, we have limited experience in introducing a new low nicotine category for selling our VLN cigarettes pursuant to an exposure modification order. As we work to commercialize one or more of our products for sale, including our VLN cigarettes, we base our working capital and inventory decisions on management’s estimates of future demand. If demand for such potential new products does not increase as quickly as we have estimated, our inventory costs, demands on working capital, expenses could increase, and our business and operating results could suffer. Alternatively, if we experience sales that exceed our estimates, our working capital and inventory needs may be higher than those currently anticipated. Since our RNC tobacco is not widely available and must be grown specifically for our potential products, any shortage in such tobacco could prevent us from increasing sales to meet demand and any surplus could result in inventory obsolescence and become a total loss.

Our inability to incorrectly estimate demand for future products could negatively harm our operating results and financial condition.

The manufacturing business are from the productionand sale of tobacco cigarettesproducts subjects us to significant governmental regulation and filtered cigars made for third-party brand owners ofthe failure to comply with such products. Cigaretteregulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and filtered cigar companiessubject us to substantial fines or other regulatory actions.

Companies that manufacture and/or sell tobacco products face significant governmental action,regulation, especially in the United States pursuant to the Tobacco Control Act, including but not limited to efforts aimed at reducing the incidence of tobacco use, restricting marketing and advertising, imposing regulations on packaging, mandating warnings and disclosure of flavors or other ingredients, prohibiting the sale of tobacco products with certain flavors or other characteristics, requiring compliance with certain environmental standards, limiting or prohibiting the sale of tobacco products by certain retail establishments and the sale of tobacco products in certain packaging sizes, and seeking to hold retailers and distributors responsible for the adverse health effects associated with both smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Governmental actions, combined

The Tobacco Control Act requires manufacturers of tobacco products to, among other things, provide the FDA with a list of ingredients added to tobacco products in the diminishing social acceptancemanufacturing process and register any establishment engaged in the manufacture, preparation, or processing of smokinga tobacco product. The manufacture of products is subject to strict quality control, testing and private actionsrecord-keeping requirements, and continuing obligations regarding the submission of safety reports and other post-market information. The Tobacco Control Act also authorizes the FDA to restrict smoking, have resultedpromulgate regulations requiring that the methods used in, reduced industry volumeand the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, preproduction design validation, packing, and storage of a tobacco product conform to current good manufacturing practice (“CGMP”). On March 8, 2023, the FDA issued a proposed rule to promulgate such CGMP regulations. The proposed rule, if finalized, would establish requirements for manufacturers of finished and bulk tobacco products on the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, pre-production design validation, packing, and storage of tobacco product.

We cannot guarantee that our current manufacturing facility or any other manufacturing will successfully complete FDA inspections and/or similar inspections in foreign, or that future CGMP regulations will not also negatively affect the cost or sustainability of our manufacturing facility. Our failure to comply with applicable manufacturing regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of marketing orders, seizures or recalls, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect our financial position. In addition, we and our customers for whom we manufacture tobacco products also face significant governmental regulation, including efforts aimed at reducing the incidence of tobacco use. We also cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. Actions by the FDA and in certain other countries,foreign, federal, state or local governments or agencies may impact the adult tobacco consumer acceptability of or access to tobacco products (for example, through product standards proposed by the FDA for nicotine and flavors including menthol), delay or prevent the launch of new or modified tobacco products or products with reduced exposure claims,

22

require the recall or other removal of tobacco products from the marketplace, impose additional manufacturing, labeling or packing requirements, interrupt manufacturing or otherwise significantly increase the cost of doing business. Any one or more of these actions may have a material adverse impact on us or the business of our customers for whom we expectmake tobacco products, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

For example, the Tobacco Control Act requires the FDA to issue new cigarette health warnings that these factors will continuewould include a color graphic component depicting the negative health consequences of smoking. In March 2020, the FDA published a final rule fulfilling this statutory requirement. The final rule, entitled “Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements,” specifies the 11 new textual warning label statements and accompanying color graphics that manufacturers would have to reduce consumption levels in these markets.include with cigarette packaging and advertisements. On December 7, 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas vacated the final rule, and the case is currently pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

SignificantIt is possible that significant regulatory developments will take place over the next few years in manyacross global markets, driven principally by the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”). The FCTC is the first international public health treaty on tobacco, and its objective is to establish a global agenda for tobacco regulation with the purpose of reducing initiation of tobacco use and encouraging cessation. In addition, the FCTC has led to increased efforts by tobacco control advocates and public health organizations to reduce the appeal of tobacco products. Partly because of some, or a combination of these efforts, unit sales of tobacco products in certain markets, principally Western Europe and Japan, have been in general decline and we expect this trend to continue. Our operating results could be significantly affected by any significant increase in the cost of complying with new regulatory requirements.

If implemented in theCompliance with current and future the FDA requirementregulations regarding graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging and in cigarette advertising is likely totobacco could have a negativematerial impact on our business and operations and could result in fines, government actions to restrict or prevent sales of our third-party customers’ products.products, as well as result in substantial costs and expenses.

In November 2010, as required by the Tobacco Control Act, the FDA issued a proposed rule to modify the required warnings that appear on cigarette packages and in cigarette advertisements. These warnings were finalized on June 21, 2011 and consisted of nine new textual warning statements accompanied by color graphics depicting the negative health consequences of smoking. The FDA selected nine images from the originally proposed 36 images after reviewing the relevant scientific literature, analyzing the results from an 18,000-person study, and considering more than 1,700 comments from a variety of groups. The graphic health warnings were to be located beneath the cellophane wrapping on cigarette packages and were to comprise the top 50 percent of the front and rear panels of cigarette packages. Although these graphic health warnings were scheduled to be implemented in September 2012, a federal judge ruled that these warnings are unconstitutional. If these graphic health warnings are implemented in the future, all cigarettes manufactured for sale or distribution in the United States will need to include these new graphic health warnings on their packages. Any reduction in the number of smokers will probably reduce the demand for the products manufactured by our factory for third-party brand owners of such products.

24

We may become subject to litigation related to cigarette smoking andand/or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, or ETS, which could severely impair our results of operations and liquidity.

Although we are not currently subject to legal proceedings related to cigarette smoking or ETS, we may become subject to litigation related to the sale upon FDA authorization, of ourBRAND A Modified Risk Cigarettes.Exposure Cigarettes or other tobacco products we sell or manufacture in the future. Legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters related to tobacco use are pending or threatened in various U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. Various types of claims are raised in these proceedings, including product liability, consumer protection, antitrust, tax, contraband shipments, patent infringement, employment matters, claims for contribution, and claims of competitors and distributors.

Litigation is subject to uncertainty, and it is possible that there could be adverse developments in pending cases. An unfavorable outcome or settlement of pending tobacco related litigation could encourage the commencement of additional litigation. The variability in pleadings, together with the actual experience of management in litigating claims, demonstrates that the monetary relief that may be specified in a lawsuit bears little relevance to the ultimate outcome.

Damages claimed in some tobacco-related litigationlitigations are significant and, in certain cases, range into the billions of dollars. We anticipate that new cases will continue to be filed. The FCTC encourages litigation against tobacco product manufacturers. It is possible that our results of operations, cash flows, or financial position could be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome or settlement of litigation.

Our production facility (NASCO) is integral to our tobacco business and adverse changes or developments affecting our facility may have an adverse impact on our business.

Our production facility is integral to our tobacco business. Adverse changes or developments affecting this facility, including, but not limited to, disease or infestation of our raw materials, a fire, an explosion, a serious injury or fatality, a power failure, a natural disaster, an epidemic, pandemic or other public health crisis, or a material failure of our security infrastructure, could reduce or require us to entirely suspend operations.

significantfailure of our site security measures and other facility requirements, including failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, could have an impact on our ability to continue operating under our facility licenses and our prospects of renewing our licenses, and could also result in a suspension or revocation of these licenses.

23

The loss of a significant customer for whom we manufacture tobacco products could have an adverse impact on our results of operation.

Currently, a significant portion of our revenues (and corresponding accounts receivable) from manufacturing tobacco products are derived from a small number of large customers, and we do not have agreements with such customers requiring them to purchase a minimum amount of products from us or guaranteeing any minimum future purchase amounts from us. Such customers may, at any time, delay or decrease their level of purchases from us or cease doing business with us altogether. Since many of our manufacturing costs are fixed, if sales to such customers cease or are reduced, we may not obtain sufficient purchase orders from other customers necessary to offset any such losses or reductions, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Product liability claims, product recalls, or other claims could cause us to incur losses or damage our reputation.

The risk of product liability claims, product recalls, and associated adverse publicity, is inherent in the development, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of tobacco products. Any product recall or lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. A successful product liability claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Though we currently have no pending product liability claims against us, we cannot assure you that such claims will not be made in the future and any such claim could cause us to incur substantial losses or damage our reputation.

Cigarettes are subject to substantial taxes. Significant increases in cigarette-related taxes have been proposed or enacted and are likely to continue to be proposed or enacted in numerous jurisdictions. These tax increases may affect the sales of our potential products and our third-parties customers’ tobacco products manufactured at our factory, which could result in decreased sales and profitability of our manufacturing business.

Tax regimes, including excise taxes, sales taxes, and import duties, can disproportionately affect the retail price of manufactured cigarettes versus other tobacco products, or disproportionately affect the relative retail price upon FDA authorization, of ourBRAND A Modified RiskExposure Cigarettes versus lower-priced cigarette brands manufactured by our competitors. Increases in cigarette taxes are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on sales of cigarettes resulting in (i) lower consumption levels, (ii) a shift in sales from manufactured cigarettes to other tobacco products or to lower-price cigarette categories, (iii) a shift from local sales to legal cross-border purchases of lower price products, and (iv) illicit products such as contraband and counterfeit.

Government mandated prices or taxes, production control programs, shifts in crops driven by economic conditions, climatic or adverse weather patterns may increase the cost or reduce the quality and/or supply of the tobacco and other agricultural products used to manufacture our products.

We depend on a small number of independent tobacco farmers to grow our specialty proprietary tobaccos with specific nicotine contents for our products. As with other agricultural commodities, the price of tobacco leaf can be influenced by imbalances in supply and demand, and crop quality can be influenced by variations in weather patterns, diseases, and pests. This risk is greater for us, as there would be no alternative supply of RNC tobacco in the event that one of our growers experiences a material adverse event with respect to a particular RNC tobacco crop or the quantity or quality was not as we anticipated, and we would not be able to supply leaf for our VLN® cigarettes.

We must also compete with other tobacco companies for contract production with independent tobacco farmers. Tobacco production in certain countries is subject to a variety of controls, including government mandated prices and production control programs. Changes in the patterns of demand for agricultural products could cause farmers to plant less tobacco. Any significant change in tobacco leaf prices or taxes, quality and quantity could affect our profitability and our business.

24

We distribute and sell our products outside of the U.S., which subjects us to other regulatory risks.

In addition to the authorization to market and sell our RNC tobacco cigarettes using modified risk claims in the U.S., we continue to seek governmental authorizations required to market our RNC tobacco cigarettes and our other products in other countries. Marketing of our products is not permitted in certain countries until we have obtained required authorizations or exemptions in these individual countries. The regulatory review process varies from country to country, and authorization by foreign governmental authorities is unpredictable, uncertain, and generally expensive. Our ability to market our potential products could be substantially limited due to delays in receipt of, or failure to receive, the necessary authorizations or exemptions. We anticipate commencing the applications required in some or all of these countries in the future. Failure to obtain necessary regulatory authorizations or exemptions could impair our ability to generate revenue from international sources.

We may become subject to governmental investigations on a range of matters.

Tobacco companies are often subject to investigations, including allegations of contraband shipments of cigarettes, allegations of unlawful pricing activities within certain markets, allegations of underpayment of custom duties and/or excise taxes, and allegations of false and misleading usage of descriptors such as “lights” and “ultra-lights.” We cannot predict the outcome of any investigations to which we may become subject, but we may be materially affected by an unfavorable outcome of potential future investigations.

Our business model inherently loses customers.

Our VLN® cigarette is designed to help people smoke less and eventually quit smoking completely.  If our product is successful, we will lose customers as a result.  A significant loss in VLN® customers, or our inability to add new VLN® customers faster than we lose customers, could prevent our VLN® business from growing and have a material negative impact on the results of our operations. 

We may be unsuccessful in anticipating changes in adult consumer preferences, responding to changes in consumer purchase behavior or managing through difficult competitive and economic conditions, which could have an adverse effect on business.

In the tobacco industry, we are subject to intense competition and changes in adult consumer preferences. To be successful, we must:

anticipate and respond to new and evolving adult consumer preferences;
develop, manufacture, market and distribute new and innovative products that appeal to adult consumers (including, where appropriate, through arrangements with, or investments in, third parties);
improve productivity; and
protect or enhance margins through cost savings and price increases.

The willingness of adult consumers to purchase premium consumer tobacco products, such as our RNC cigarettes, depends in part on economic conditions. In periods of economic uncertainty, adult consumers may purchase more discount brands and/or, in the case of tobacco products, consider lower-priced tobacco products, which could have a material adverse effect on the business and profitability.

25

We may be unsuccessful in developing and commercializing adjacent products or processes, including innovative tobacco products that may reduce the health risks associated with certain other tobacco products and that appeal to adult tobacco consumers.

Some innovative tobacco products may reduce the health risks associated with certain other tobacco products, while continuing to offer adult tobacco consumers products that meet their taste expectations and evolving preferences. Examples include tobacco-containing and nicotine-containing products that reduce or eliminate exposure to cigarette smoke and/or constituents identified by public health authorities as harmful, such as electronically heated tobacco products, oral nicotine pouches, and e-vapor products.We may not succeed in our efforts to develop and commercialize any adjacent products.

Further, we cannot predict whether regulators, including the FDA, will permit the marketing or sale of any particular innovative products (including products with claims of reduced risk to adult consumers), the speed with which they may make such determinations or whether regulators will impose an unduly burdensome regulatory framework on such products. In addition, the FDA could, for a variety of reasons, determine that innovative products currently on the market, or those that have previously received authorization, including with a claim of reduced exposure, are not appropriate for the public health and the FDA could require such products be taken off the market. We also cannot predict whether any products will appeal to adult tobacco consumers or whether adult tobacco consumers’ purchasing decisions would be affected by reduced-risk claims on such products if permitted. Adverse developments on any of these matters could negatively impact the commercial viability of such products.

If we do not succeed in our efforts to develop and commercialize innovative tobacco products or to obtain or maintain regulatory authorizations for the marketing or sale of products, including for the use of claims of reduced exposure, but one or more of our competitors does succeed, we may be at a competitive disadvantage, which could have an adverse effect on our ability to commercialize our products.

An extended disruption at a facility or in service by a supplier, distributor or distribution chain service provider could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We face risks inherent in reliance on one manufacturing facility and a small number of key suppliers, distributors and distribution chain service providers. A pandemic (including COVID-19), natural or man-made disaster or other disruption that affects the manufacturing operations, the operations of any key supplier, distributor or distribution chain service provider or any other disruption in the supply or distribution of goods or services (including a key supplier’s inability to comply with government regulations or unwillingness to supply goods or services to a tobacco company) could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The FDA could force the removal of our products from the U.S. market.

The FDA has broad authority over the regulation of tobacco products. The FDA could, among other things, force us to remove from the U.S. market our RNC tobacco cigarettes even after the FDA authorization on December 17, 2019 of our PMTA for us to market our RNC tobacco cigarettes, or the authorization of our MRTP application on December 23, 2021, to enable us to use certain modified exposure claims with respect to our VLN® cigarettes. In addition, the exposure modification order that enables us to market our VLN® cigarettes as MRTPs was granted for a period of five years, which is the maximum duration for a marketing granted order for such products under the Family Smoking Prevention & Tobacco Control Act (PUBLIC LAW 111–31—JUNE 22, 2009). Consequently, we will need to reapply to FDA under a new MRTP application to extend the FDA’s exposure modification order beyond December 23, 2026.  The MRTP authorization process is a complex, substantial and lengthy regulatory undertaking.  The FDA may or may not grant continued authorization of these product claims, including based on FDA's assessment of whether the product application(s) satisfy the statutory requirements for such an order, and whether we have adequately complied with the conditions imposed on us in connection with the FDA’s exposure modification order, such as requirements relating to recordkeeping, reporting and post-market studies. Any action by the FDA to remove our products from the U.S. market, including the termination or non-renewal of the exposure modification orders for our VLN® cigarettes would have a material adverse impact on our business.

26

A ban on menthol or flavored tobacco products could have a material adverse impact on our business.

On April 27, 2022, the FDA proposed new rules to prohibit menthol as a characterizing flavor in cigarettes and prohibit all characterizing flavors (other than tobacco) in cigars. There has been increasing activity on the state and local levels with respect to scrutiny of menthol and flavored tobacco products, including a recent law passed by the State of California prohibiting tobacco retailers from selling most flavored and menthol tobacco products, including VLN® Menthol King. If these proposed rules are finalized and implemented, if new rules are proposed or if additional states or governments pass laws similar to the State of California, we could be negatively impacted through decreased sales, a requirement to remove non-compliant tobacco products from the marketplace, associated interruptions in manufacturing or business disruptions. In addition, although we believe that our VLN® Menthol King reduced nicotine cigarettes will be exempted from FDA’s menthol ban on cigarettes, there is no guarantee that they will be exempted by the FDA or any other state or local government. Accordingly, the implementation of these proposed or new laws or rules may have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

OurCertain of our proprietary rights have expired or may expire or may not otherwise adequately protect our intellectual property, products and potential products, and if we cannot obtain adequate protection of our intellectual property, products and potential products, we may not be able to successfully market our products and potential products.

Our commercial success will depend, in part, on obtaining and maintaining intellectual property protection for our technologies, products, and potential products. We will only be able to protect our technologies, products, and potential products from unauthorized use by third parties to the extent that valid and enforceable patents cover them, or to the extent that other market exclusionary rights apply.

25

The patent positions of life sciences companies, like ours, can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in such companies’ patents has emerged to date in the United States. The general patent environment outside the United States also involves significant uncertainty. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or that the scope of these patent rights could provide a sufficient degree of future protection that could permit us to gain or keep our competitive advantage with respect to these products and technology. Additionally, life science companies like ours are often dependent on creating a pipeline of products. We may not be able to develop additional potential products or proprietary technologies that produce commercially viable products or that are themselves patentable.

Although there are currently no challenges to any portion of our intellectual property, ourOur issued patents may be subject to challenge and potential invalidation by third parties.parties and our competitors may develop processes to achieve similar results without infringing on our patents. Changes in either the patent laws or in the interpretations of patent laws in the United States, or in other countries, may diminish the value of our intellectual property. In addition, others may independently develop similar or alternative products and technologies that may be outside the scope of our intellectual property. Should third parties develop alternative methods of regulating nicotine in tobacco or obtain patent rights to similar products or technology without infringing on our intellectual property rights, this may have an adverse effect on our business.

Our patent protection relating to the QPT gene expires in 2018. The expiration of a portion of the QPT patent family will give third-partiesin 2018 may provide third parties with the freedom to target the QPT gene in the tobacco plant. This could result in experiments to try to reduce nicotine levels in tobacco plants to levels that may satisfy the planned new nicotine reduction regulations coming from the FDA. There can be no assurance about whether any third-parties will or will not be successful in such efforts, and/or how long or short in time such efforts will entail.entail and/or if such efforts will or will not infringe other genes and other intellectual property on which we have continuing patent protection that would need to be used, in combination with QPT, to result in RNC tobacco. If independent researchers or our competitors are able to successfully reduce nicotine levels in tobacco plants without violating our patent protections, our ability to license our technology would be negatively impacted and we would likely face increased competition.

27

We also rely on license agreements and trade secrets to protect our technology, products, and potential products, especially where we do not believe patent protection is appropriate or obtainable. Trade secrets, however, are difficult to protect. While we believe that we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our own, our licensees’ or our strategic partners’ employees, consultants, contractors or advisors may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. We seek to protect this information, in part, through the use of non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants, advisors, and others. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for a breach. In addition, we cannot ensure that those agreements will provide adequate protection for our trade secrets, know-how, or other proprietary information, or prevent their unauthorized use or disclosure.

To the extent that consultants or key employees apply technological information independently developed by them or by others to our products and potential products, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights of the information, which may not be resolved in our favor. Key employees are required to assign all intellectual property rights in their discoveries to us. However, these key employees may terminate their relationship with us, and we cannot preclude them indefinitely from dealing with our competitors. If our trade secrets become known to competitors with greater experience and financial resources, the competitors may copy or use our trade secrets and other proprietary information in the advancement of their products, methods, or technologies. If we were to prosecute a claim that a third party had illegally obtained and was using our trade secrets, it could be expensive and time consuming and the outcome could be unpredictable. In addition, courts outside the United States are sometimes less willing to protect trade secrets than courts in the United States. Moreover, if our competitors independently develop equivalent knowledge, we would lack any contractual claim to this information, and our business could be harmed.

The ability to commercialize our existing and potential products will depend on our ability to sell such products without infringing the patent or proprietary rights of third parties. If we are sued for infringing intellectual property rights of third parties, such litigation could be costly and time consuming and an unfavorable outcome could have a significant adverse effect on our business.

The ability to commercialize our potential products will depend on our ability to sell such products without infringing the patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. Third-party intellectual property rights in our field are complicated, and third-party intellectual property rights in these fields are continuously evolving. While we have conducted searches for such third-party intellectual property rights, we have not performed specific searches for third-party intellectual property rights that may raise freedom-to-operate issues, and we have not obtained legal opinions regarding commercialization of our potential products. As such, there may be existing patents that may affect our ability to commercialize our potential products.

In addition, because patent applications are published up to 18 months after their filing, and because patent applications can take several years to issue, there may be currently pending third-party patent applications and freedom-to-operate issues that are unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents.

If a third-party claims that we infringe on its patents or other proprietary rights, we could face a number of issues that could seriously harm our competitive position, including:

26

·infringement claims that, with or without merit, can be costly and time consuming to litigate, can delay the regulatory approval process,authorization processes, and can divert management’s attention from our core business strategy;

·substantial damages for past infringement which we may have to pay if a court determines that our products or technologies infringe upon a competitor’s patent or other proprietary rights;

·a court order prohibiting us from commercializing our potential products or technologies unless the holder licenses the patent or other proprietary rights to us, which such holder is not required to do;

·if a license is available from a holder, we may have to pay substantial royalties or grant cross licenses to our patents or other proprietary rights; and

·redesigning our process so that it does not infringe the third-party intellectual property, which may not be possible, or which may require substantial time and expense including delays in bringing our potential products to market.

28

Such actions could harm our competitive position and our ability to generate revenue and could result in increased costs.

Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours.

We own or exclusively control many issued patents and pending patent applications. We cannot be certain that these patent applications will issue, in whole or in part, as patents. Patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until the patents are published or are issued. Since publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature tends to lag behind actual discoveries by several months, we cannot be certain that we are the first creator of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on these inventions. We also cannot be certain that our pending patent applications will result in issued patents or that any of our issued patents will afford protection against a competitor. In addition, patent applications filed in foreign countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ from those of the United States, and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications related to U.S. patents will be issued. Furthermore, if these patent applications issue, some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the United States.

The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we or our licensors file will result in patents being issued, or that our patents and any patents that may be issued to us in the near future will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, patents issued to us may be infringed upon or designed around by others and others may obtain patents that we need to license or design around, either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our operations.

We license certain patent rights from third-party owners. If such owners do not properly maintain or enforce the patents underlying such licenses, our competitive position and business prospects could be harmed.

We license rights to third-party intellectual property that is necessary or useful for our business, and we may enter into additional licensing agreements in the future. Our success could depend in part on the ability of some of our licensors to obtain, maintain, and enforce patent protection for their intellectual property, in particular, those patents to which we have secured exclusive rights. Our licensors may not successfully prosecute the patent applications to which we are licensed.licensed and may in some instances retain rights to the intellectual property that allows them to compete with us. Even if patents are issued with respect to these patent applications, our licensors may fail to maintain these patents, may determine not to pursue litigation against other companies that are infringing these patents, or may pursue such litigation less aggressively than we could. Without protection for the intellectual property we license, other companies might be able to offer substantially identical products for sale, which could adversely affect our competitive business position and harm our business prospects.

27

Our worldwide exclusive licenses relating to tobacco from NCSU involvesinvolve multiple patent families.families and trade secrets. The exclusive rights under the NCSU agreements expire on the date on which the last patent or registered plant variety covered by the subject license expires in the country or countries where such patents or registered plant varieties are in effect. The NCSU licenses relate predominately to issued patents, and our exclusive rights in the NCSU licenses willare expected to expire in 2023.2042.

Our worldwide sublicenseIf any of our license agreements or other intellectual property agreements are not effective at preventing others from Anandia, a plant biotechnology company based in Vancouver, Canada, grantscompeting with us exclusive rights in the United States and co-exclusive rights with Anandia everywhere else in the world (except not in Canada where Anandia retains exclusive rights) to certain patents and patent applications relating to certain genes in the hemp/cannabis plant that are required for the production of cannabinoids, the “active ingredients” in the cannabis plant. The Anandia sublicense continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected toand/or using our intellectual property, our business could be in 2035.

adversely affected.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Nasdaq may delist our common stock from trading on its exchange which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our common stock and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“NASDAQ”). If Nasdaq delists our common stock from trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

a limited availability of market quotations for our common stock;

29

reduced liquidity with respect to our securities;
a determination that shares of our common stock are “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our shares to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our shares;
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
a decreased ability to issue additional common stock or obtain additional financing in the future.

On November 7, 2023, the Company received a deficiency letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department notifying the Company that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the closing bid price for the Company’s common stock has been below the minimum $1.00 per share required for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (“Rule 5550(a)(2)”). In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company has been given 180 calendar days, or until May 5, 2024, to regain compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2). If the Company does not regain compliance with Rule 5550(a)(2) by May 5, 2024, the Company may be afforded a second 180 calendar day period to regain compliance. To qualify, the Company would be required to meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for the Nasdaq Capital Market, except for the minimum bid price requirement. In addition, the Company would be required to provide written notice to Nasdaq of its intent to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period. The Company intends to monitor the closing bid price of its common stock and may, if appropriate, consider implementing available options to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement under the Nasdaq Listing Rules such as a reverse stock split.

On January 24, 2024, the stockholders approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to effect a reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock at a ratio between 1-for-2 and 1-for-16, to be determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors, for the purpose of complying with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, subject to the Board or Directors’ discretion to abandon such amendment. The Company has not implemented the reverse stock split as of March 25, 2024.

An active trading market for our common stock may not be sustained and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price at which you purchased them.

An active trading market for our shares may not be sustained. In the absence of an active trading market for our common stock, shares of common stock may not be able to be resold at or above the purchase price of such shares. Although there can be no assurances, we expect that our common stock will continue to be quotedlisted on the New York Stock Exchange American market (“NYSE American”).NASDAQ. However, even if our common stock continues to be quotedlisted on the NYSE American,NASDAQ, there is no assurance that an active market for our common stock will continue in the foreseeable future. There also can be no assurance that we can maintain such listing on the NYSE American.NASDAQ. If we are ever no longer listed on the NYSE AmericanNASDAQ or other national stock exchange in the future, then it would be more difficult to dispose of shares or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of our common stock compared to securities of companies whose shares are traded on national stock exchanges.

Our stock price may be highly volatile and could decline in value.

Our common stock is currently traded on the NYSE AmericanNASDAQ and the market pricesprice for our common stock havehas been volatile. Further, the market prices for securities in general have been highly volatile and may continue to be highly volatile in the future. The following factors, in addition to other risk factors described in this section, may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock:

·failure or discontinuation of any of our research programs;

·delays in establishing new strategic relationships;

·delays in the development of our potential products and commercialization of our potential products;

·market conditions in our sector and issuance of new or changed securities analysts’ reports or recommendations;

·general economic conditions, including recent adverse changes in the global financial markets;

·actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results;

28

·developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;

·introduction of technological innovations or new commercial products by us or our competitors;

30

·issues in manufacturing or distributing our products or potential products;

·market acceptance of our products or potential products;

·third-party healthcare reimbursement policies;

·FDA or other United States or foreign regulatory actions affecting us or our industry;

·litigation or public concern about the safety of our products or potential products;

·negative press or publicity regarding us or our common stock;
the announcement of litigation against us or the results of on-going litigation;
additions or departures of key personnel;

·third-party sales of large blocks of our common stock;stock or third party short-selling activity;

·third-party articles regarding us or our securities;
pending or future shareholder litigation;
sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors, or significant stockholders; and

·equity sales by us of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock to fund our operations.

These and other external factors may cause the market price and demand for our common stock to fluctuate substantially, which may limit or prevent investors from readily selling their shares of common stock and may otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our common stock. In addition, in the past, when the market price of a stock has been volatile, holders of that stock have instituted securities class action litigation against the company that issued the stock. Ifstock, such as the current class action and derivative lawsuits. Such lawsuits and any of our stockholders brought a lawsuit againstfuture related lawsuits could cause us we couldto incur substantial costs defending the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit couldand can also divert the time and attention of our management.management, which would have a negative adverse impact on our business. See the risk factor below entitled: “We are named defendant in certain litigation matters, including federal securities class action lawsuits and derivative complaints; if we are unable to resolve these matters favorably, then our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.”

We are named defendant in certain litigation matters, including federal securities class action lawsuits and derivative complaints; if we are unable to resolve these matters favorably, then our business, operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We are currently involved in certain litigation matters, including securities class action and derivative litigation. See "Item 3 – Legal Proceedings" included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We cannot at this time predict the outcome of these matters or any future litigations matters (whether related or unrelated) or reasonably determine the probability of a material adverse result or reasonably estimate range of potential exposure, if any, that these matters or any future matters might have on us, our business, our financial condition or our results of operations, although such effects, including the cost to defend, any judgements or indemnification obligations, among others, could be materially adverse to us. In addition, in the future, we may need to record litigation reserves with respect to these matters. Further, regardless of how these matters proceed, it could divert our management’s attention and other resources away from our business.

Future sales of our common stock will result in dilution to our common stockholders.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market may depress the prevailing market price for our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the future sale of our equity securities. Additionally, if any of the holders of outstanding options or warrants exercise or convert those shares, as applicable, our common stockholders will incur dilution in their relative percentage ownership. The prospect of this possible dilution may also impact the price of our common stock.

31

We do not expect to declare any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

We have not paid cash dividends to date on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Additionally, the terms of any future debt facilities may preclude us from paying dividends on the common stock. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock could be the sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

29

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our articles of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Nevada law, could impair a takeover attempt.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws currently contain provisions that, together with Nevada law, could have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Our corporate governance documents presently include the following provisions:

·providing for a “staggered” board of directors in which only one-third (1/3) of the directors can be elected in any year;

·authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights superior to our common stock; and

·limiting the liability of, and providing indemnifications to, our directors and officers.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay hostile takeovers and changes in control of our Company or changes in our management.

As a Nevada corporation, we also may become subject to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes Sections 78.378 through 78.3793, which prohibit an acquirer, under certain circumstances, from voting shares of a corporation’s stock after crossing specific threshold ownership percentages, unless the acquirer obtains the approval of the stockholders of the issuer corporation. The first such threshold is the acquisition of at least one-fifth, but less than one-third of the outstanding voting power of the issuer. We may become subject to the above referenced Statutes if we have 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom are residents of the State of Nevada and do business in the State of Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation.

As a Nevada corporation, we are subject to the provisions of Nevada Revised Statutes Sections 78.411 through 78.444, which prohibit an “interested stockholder” from entering into a combination with the corporation, unless certain conditions are met. An “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, beneficially owns (or within the prior two years did own) 10 percent or more of the corporation’s voting stock.

Any provision of our amended and restated articles of incorporation, our bylaws or Nevada law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control of our Company could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

30

Item 1BUnresolved Staff Comments.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.

32

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

The Company recognizes the critical importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, clients, business partners and employees. The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee oversight of cybersecurity and other information technology risks affecting the Company. The Audit Committee and senior management are actively involved in oversight of the Company’s risk management program, and cybersecurity represents an important component of the Company’s overall approach to enterprise risk management (“ERM”). In general, the Company seeks to address cybersecurity risks through a comprehensive, cross-functional approach that is focused on preserving the confidentiality, security and availability of the information that the Company collects and stores by identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats and effectively responding to cybersecurity incidents when they occur.

Risk Management and Strategy

As one of the critical elements of the Company’s overall ERM approach, the Company’s cybersecurity program is focused on the following key areas:

Collaborative Approach: The Company has implemented a comprehensive, cross-functional approach to identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats and incidents, while also implementing controls and procedures that provide for the prompt escalation of certain cybersecurity incidents so that decisions regarding the public disclosure and reporting of such incidents can be made by management in a timely manner.

Technical Safeguards: The Company deploys technical safeguards that are designed to protect the Company’s information systems from cybersecurity threats, including firewalls, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware functionality and access controls, which are evaluated and improved through vulnerability assessments and cybersecurity threat intelligence.

Third-Party Risk Management: The Company maintains a comprehensive, risk-based approach to identifying and overseeing cybersecurity risks presented by third parties, including vendors, service providers and other external users of the Company’s systems, as well as the systems of third parties that could adversely impact our business in the event of a cybersecurity incident affecting those third-party systems.

Education and Awareness: The Company provides regular, mandatory training for personnel regarding cybersecurity threats as a means to equip the Company’s personnel with effective tools to address cybersecurity threats, and to communicate the Company’s evolving information security policies, standards, processes and practices.

The Company engages a third-party service provider specializing in information technology, which assists with the periodic assessment and testing of the Company’s policies, standards, processes and practices that are designed to address cybersecurity threats and incidents. These efforts include a wide range of activities, including audits, assessments, tabletop exercises, threat modeling, vulnerability testing and other exercises focused on evaluating the effectiveness of our cybersecurity measures and planning.

Governance

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s ERM process, including the management of risks arising from cybersecurity threats. On an annual basis, the Audit Committee discusses with Senior Management cybersecurity risks, which address a wide range of topics including recent developments, evolving standards, vulnerability assessments, third-party and independent reviews, the threat environment, technological trends and information security considerations arising with respect to the Company’s peers and third parties. As applicable, the Audit Committee also receives prompt and timely information regarding any cybersecurity incident that meets established reporting thresholds, as well as ongoing updates regarding any such incident until it has been addressed.

33

Senior management, in coordination with the Company’s third-party service provider specializing in information technology, works collaboratively across the Company to implement a program designed to protect the Company’s information systems from cybersecurity threats and to promptly respond to any cybersecurity incidents in accordance with the Company’s incident response and recovery plans. Through ongoing communications with the third party service provider, Senior Management monitors the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity threats and incidents in real time and report such threats and incidents to the Audit Committee when appropriate.

Cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents, have not materially affected or are reasonably likely to affect the Company, including its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not be materially affected in the future by such risks or any future material incidents. For more information on our cybersecurity related risks, see Item 1A Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2.Properties.

Our principal administrative offices areexecutive office and headquarters is located in Mocksville, North Carolina, a leased facility. We previously held our principal executive office and headquarters at 8560 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221 (our former principalleased office was located at 9530 Main Street, Clarance, New York 14031). On October 4, 2017, we entered a new lease for new office space in Williamsville, New York with an initial three-year term and with a monthly lease payment of $6,375. Future minimum annual lease payments under the new office lease will be approximately $64,000, $76,000 and $76,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

 On May 1, 2016, we entered into a sublease for laboratory space in Buffalo, New York. The sublease callsYork through the end of fiscal 2023.

As of December 31, 2023, we operated four tobacco facilities located in Mocksville, North Carolina and surrounding areas. These locations are comprised of one manufacturing facility (which is also our principal executive office and headquarters) and three leased inventory storage facilities. We believe the facilities we operate and their equipment are effectively utilized, well maintained, generally are in good condition, and will be able to accommodate our capacity needs to meet current and growing levels of demand. We continuously review our anticipated requirements for a monthly paymentfacilities and, on the basis of $1,471 through April 30, 2018. Additionally, on February 1, 2017, we entered into an amendmentthat review, may from time to time acquire additional facilities, expand or dispose of existing facilities.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

See Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies – Litigation - to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for information concerning our on-going litigation. In addition to the initial sublease calling for the sublease of additional lab space at a cost of $1,219 per month, bringing the total monthly lease obligationlawsuits described in Note 12 to $2,690. On April 26, 2017, we entered into a further amendment to the sublease to extend the term of the sublease for an additional twelve (12) months, commencing on May 1, 2017 at a total cost of $2,770 per month for the total lease obligation. On February 21, 2018, we entered into a new sublease amendment that extended the sublease term through June 30, 2019, and calls for a monthly sublease payment of $5,706 beginning on March 1, 2018. Future minimum sublease payments for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 will be approximately $63,000 and $34,000, respectively.

We lease a manufacturing facility and warehouse located in North Carolina on a triple net lease basis. The manufacturing facility lease commenced on January 14, 2014 and had an initial term of twelve (12) months. The manufacturing facility lease contains four (4) additional extensions; with one lease extension being for an additional one (1) year and with the other three (3) lease extensions each being for an additional two (2) years in duration, exercisable at our option. We are currently in the second two-year lease extension term that will expire on October 31, 2019. The lease expense for our manufacturing facility for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 amounted to approximately $156,000, $146,000 and $127,000, respectively. The future minimum annual lease payments if we exercise each of the additional extensions are approximately as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2018 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2019 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2020 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2021 - $141,000 

On August 14, 2017, we entered into a lease for warehouse space in North Carolina to store and operate tobacco leaf processing equipment, to store our proprietary tobacco leaf and to store inventory used in our contract manufacturing business. The lease calls for a monthly payment of $4,665, expires on August 14, 2018 and contains twelve-month renewal options as long as we continue to lease the warehouse. Future minimum annual lease payments will be approximately $56,000 per year for each subsequent year the warehouse space is leased by us.

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.

Fromconsolidated financial statements, from time to time we may be involved in claims arising in the ordinary course of business. To our knowledge, other than the casecases described below,in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements, no material legal proceedings, governmental actions, investigations or claims are currently pending against us or involve us that, in the opinion of our management, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

31

On April 26, 2016, Crede CG III, LTD. (“Crede”) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY Court”) entitledCrede CG III, LTD. v. 22nd Century Group, Inc. On May 19, 2016, Crede filed an Amended Complaint that included seven counts, alleging among other things, that the Company allegedly breached and/or interfered with certain agreements entered into with Crede, including the joint venture agreement relating to efforts to sell the Company’s proprietary tobacco into China, the Tranche 1A warrant and the prior securities purchase agreement with Crede. The Amended Complaint sought money damages, to rescind the securities purchase agreement, to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief to require the Company to issue to Crede 2,077,555 shares of the Company’s common stock under the exchange provision of the Tranche 1A warrant, and entry of an injunction prohibiting the Company from selling tobacco into China without the joint venture’s involvement. The Amended Complaint also sought attorney’s fees and such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper. We believe that the claims are frivolous, meritless and that the Company has substantial legal and factual defenses to the claims.

On May 19, 2016, Crede filed a motion for preliminary injunction, asking the SDNY Court to require the Company to issue 2,077,555 shares of its common stock to Crede under the exchange provision of the Tranche 1A warrant. After conducting an evidentiary hearing on this motion on June 14, 2016, the SDNY Court denied Crede’s motion and held, among other things, that Crede did not prove the potential for irreparable harm or a likelihood of success on its claim for such 2,077,555 shares under the Tranche 1A warrant, and that there was a likelihood that Crede had violated the Activity Restrictions as defined and contained in the Tranche 1A warrant, which would bar Crede’s claim for such shares from the Company.

Following such ruling, on July 11, 2016, the Company filed a motion to sever the Crede lawsuit into two separate cases, requesting all claims relating to the Tranche 1A warrant and the securities purchase agreement to stay in the SDNY Court and all claims relating to the China joint venture agreement to be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the “WDNY Court”), where the Company’s headquarters are located. On January 20, 2017, the SDNY Court granted the Company’s motion.

On February 14, 2017, Crede voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against the Company in the WDNY Court.

On February 21, 2017, the SDNY Court granted the Company’s request to file a motion for summary judgment for the claims remaining in the SDNY Court, with all discovery in the case being deferred until after the SDNY Court conducts a hearing and issues its decision on the summary judgment motion of the Company. On March 20, 2017, the Company filed its motion for summary judgment for the claims remaining in the SDNY Court. The response by Crede to the Company’s summary judgment motion was filed by Crede on May 1, 2017. On May 15, 2017, the Company filed its response to Crede’s filing.

On December 28, 2017, the SDNY Court issued its decision in response to the Company’s motion for summary judgement, with such decision (i) granting the Company’s motion for summary judgement relating to Count II of the Amended Compliant, which eliminates Crede’s claim to rescind the prior securities purchase agreement, dated September 17, 2014, and denies Crede’s claim for the return of any money from the Company under that securities purchase agreement, and (ii) denying the Company’s motion for summary judgement on the remaining Counts of the Amended Compliant. In this decision, the SDNY Court also found that Crede breached the Activity Restrictions as defined and contained in the Tranche 1A warrant. As a result of this decision by the SDNY Court, the parties will now proceed with discovery in the case in preparation for a trial on the remaining Counts III, IV and V of the Amended Complaint, which relate to Crede’s claim (i) to exchange the Tranche 1A warrant for 2,077,555 shares of our common stock even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant, (ii) for an unquantified additional amount of shares of our common stock that allegedly still remains under the Tranche 1A warrant even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant; and (iii) for alleged damages for the alleged breach of the Tranche 1A warrant in an amount in excess of $18 million, plus costs and interest, even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant. On January 26, 2018, the SDNY Court entered a case management order that such discovery be completed by May 18, 2018 and scheduling a pretrial conference for May 23, 2018.

We believe that the claims are frivolous, meritless and that the Company has substantial legal and factual defenses to the claims. The Company has defended and intends to continue to defend against these claims vigorously.

32

Item 4.Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable

PART II

Item 5.

Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is quotedlisted on the NYSE AmericanNasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “XXII.” As of December 31, 2017,March 25, 2024, there were 98approximately 122 holders of record of our common stock based on the records of our transfer agent. However, because many of our shares of our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the highstock are held by brokers and low sales prices per shareother institutions on behalf of shareholders, we believe there are considerably more beneficial holders of our common stock as derived from quotations provided by the NYSE American.than record holders.

34

Quarter Ended High  Low 
       
December 31, 2017 $3.50  $1.95 
September 30, 2017 $3.34  $1.33 
June 30, 2017 $2.00  $1.13 
March 31, 2017 $1.35  $0.81 
December 31, 2016 $1.71  $0.90 
September 30, 2016 $1.48  $0.79 
June 30, 2016 $0.98  $0.73 
March 31, 2016 $1.44  $0.71 

Dividend Policy

We have not previously and do not plan to declare or pay any dividends on our common stock. Our current policy is to retain all funds and any earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors, including current financial condition, operating results and current and anticipated cash needs.

Recent issuancesSales of Unregistered Securities

DuringOn November 2, 2023, we executed a licensing agreement (“NCSU License Agreement”) with North Carolina State University (“NCSU”). Pursuant to the terms of 2017,the License Agreement, NCSU granted the Company exclusive rights to Patent Rights and Plant Materials (each as defined in the NCSU License Agreement) owned by NCSU which will allow us to develop and commercialize reduced nicotine content tobacco using the latest non-GMO technology. As partial consideration, we issued 5,250 shares of common stock to an investor that exercised 5,250 warrants for cash to purchase183,680 shares of our common stock.

Duringstock, equal in value to $100,000, to NCSU (the “Stock Consideration”) calculated using the first quartertwenty-day average closing price of 2018, we issued 426,180 shares ofthe Company’s common stock to various investorsimmediately preceding November 2, 2023. The Stock Consideration was issued in a private placement and was exempt from the cashless exercise of 700,148 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.

The shares were offered and sold pursuant to exemptions from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, andin reliance on Section 4(a)(2) thereof as a transaction not involving a public offering and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

On November 28, 2023, we commenced a warrant inducement offering with the holders of our previously outstanding 31,779,654 warrants consisting of: (i) the common stock purchase warrants issued on or about June 22, 2023; (ii) the common stock purchase warrants issued on or about July 10, 2023; (iii) the common stock purchase warrants of issued on or about July 21, 2023; and/or (iv) the common stock purchase warrants issued on or about October 19, 2023 (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”), which Existing Warrants were exercisable for an equal number of shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.525. We offer the holders of the Existing Warrants an inducement period, whereby we agreed to issue new warrants (the “Inducement Warrants”) to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock equal to 200% of the number of shares of common stock issued pursuant to the exercise by the holders of the Existing Warrants during the Inducement Period, for cash, at a reduced exercise price equal to the Nasdaq Minimum Price (as defined in the as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d)). As a result of the warrant inducement offering, 28,649,654 Existing Warrants were exercised for shares of common stock and 57,299,308 Inducement Warrants were issued. The Inducement Warrants were issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

We amended the outstanding Debentures to (i) allow the holders to voluntarily convert the Debentures, in whole or in part, into shares of our common stock (“Voluntary Conversion Option”) on the earlier of (i) June 30, 2024 and (ii) the public announcement of a Fundamental Transaction at a conversion price equal to the lower of (x) $1.00 per share and (y) the closing sale price of our common stock on June 29, 2024 (the “Conversion Price”), and (ii) include a mandatory prepayment of the outstanding principal of the Debentures in an amount equal to 20% of the net cash proceeds of any issuance by us of any of its stock, or other Equity Interests (as defined in the Debentures) or the incurrence or issuance of any indebtedness. The amended Debentures and shares issuable upon conversion of the amended Debentures were issued in a private placement and were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) thereof as a transaction not involving a public offering and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

35

Shares authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

On April 12, 2014, ourJune 16, 2023, the stockholders of 22nd Century Group, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the amendment and restatement of the 22nd Century Group, Inc. 20142021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “OIP”“Plan”) and the authorization of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock available for issuance thereunder. On April 29, 2017, our stockholders approved an amendment to the OIP to increase the number of shares available for issuance by an additional 5,000,000 shares.. The OIPPlan allows for the granting of equity and cash incentive awards to eligible individuals over the life of the OIP,Plan, including the issuance of up to an aggregate of 10,000,000566,667 shares of the Company’s common stock and any remaining shares under the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to awards under the OIP.Plan. The OIPPlan has a term of ten years and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to determine the various types of incentive awards that may be granted to recipients under this planthe Plan and the number of shares of common stock to underlie each such award under the OIP.

33

Plan. As of December 31, 2023, we had available 606,406 shares remaining for future awards under the Plan.

The following table summarizes the number of shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options granted, netand vesting of forfeituresrestricted stock units under the Plan and sales,our prior 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, the weighted-average exercise price of such stock options, and the number of securities available to be issued under the OIPPlan as of December 31, 2017:2023:

        Number of securities 
        remaining available for 
  Number of securities to  Weighted-average  issuance under equity 
  be issued upon exercise  exercise price of  compensation plans 
  of outstanding options,  outstanding options,  (excluding securities 
  warrants and rights  warrants and rights  reflected in column (a)) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
          
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  7,656,691  $1.31   2,933,956 
             
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   N/A   - 
             
Total  7,656,691       2,933,956(1)

    

    

    

Number of securities 

 

remaining available for 

 

Number of securities to 

issuance under equity 

 

be issued upon exercise

Weighted average

compensation plans 

 

 of outstanding options, 

 exercise price of 

(excluding securities 

 

and restricted stock units

outstanding options

reflected in column (a)) 

 

(a)

 (b)

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

373,831

(1)

$

26.34

 

606,406

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

N/A

 

Total

 

373,831

 

 

606,406

(2)

(1)Consists of outstanding options of 219,316 and unvested restricted stock units of 154,515.
(2)Consists of shares available for award under the OIP.Plan.

34

Stock Performance Graph

Item 6.[Reserved]

The following information in this Item of the Annual Report on Form 10-K is not deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference to any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such information into such filing.

The performance graph shown below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock, with the total return of the NYSE American Composite Index and the NASDAQ US Small Cap Biotechnology Index for the period covering December 31, 2012 through December 31, 2017. The comparison of total return assumes that a fixed investment of $100 was invested on December 31, 2012 in the Company’s common stock and in each of the foregoing indicies and further assumes the reinvestment of dividends. The stock price performance shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

35

Item 6.Selected Financial Data.

The selected consolidated financial data for each of the five years in the period ending December 31, 2017 are derived from our audited financial statements. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in Item 15, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as set forth in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
                
Consolidated Statements of  Operations data:                    
Revenue $16,600,244  $12,279,979  $8,521,998  $528,991  $7,278,383 
Gross (loss) profit $(707,912) $(429,699) $(580,562) $30,555  $6,816,712 
Operating expenses (1) $11,644,955  $10,115,968  $10,689,010  $11,302,623  $4,859,976 
Equity based compensation included in operating expenses $941,650  $911,382  $3,585,540  $4,524,468  $2,361,962 
Operating (loss) profit $(13,299,864) $(11,584,097) $(12,043,883) $(11,767,364) $1,812,447 
Warrant liability (loss) gain - net (2) $(157,809) $29,615  $144,550  $(3,827,794) $(27,339,024)
Net loss $(13,029,117) $(11,581,430) $(11,031,931) $(15,595,358) $(26,153,158)
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.13) $(0.15) $(0.16) $(0.26) $(0.60)
Common shares used in basic earnings per share calculation  101,161,380   79,842,773   68,143,284   59,993,413   43,635,182 
                     
Consolidated Balance Sheet data:                    
Working capital $63,308,249  $13,548,118  $3,991,828  $8,033,399  $6,759,781 
Total assets $79,739,406  $27,642,357  $18,370,512  $21,953,515  $12,286,744 
Total debt $-  $307,938  $616,520  $1,100,655  $174,925 
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) $75,426,200  $24,334,359  $11,728,500  $15,219,737  $7,522,888 
                     
Other data:                    
Net cash used in (provided by) operating activities $(12,068,383) $(9,887,580) $(7,321,811) $(6,582,730) $3,855,834 
Net cash used in investing activities (3) $(60,586,245) $(553,770) $(450,661) $(2,707,992) $(3,742,789)
Net cash provided by financing activities $62,845,974  $20,149,241  $5,130,082  $9,862,810  $5,717,366 
Acquisition of patents and trademarks (4) $450,208 $356,541  $413,180  $726,989  $290,336 
Depreciation $353,435  $326,124  $319,699  $230,012  $3,028 
Amortization (5) $593,562  $516,056  $454,612  $265,284  $141,261 

(1)  Operating expenses include costs for research and development, general and administrative, pre-manufacturing facility, and sales and marketing, and exclude depreciation and amortization expense.

(2)  Warrant liability (loss) gain - net also includes the warrant amendment inducement expense of $144,548 and $3,736,313 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

(3)  Includes $58,979,131 used to purchase short-term investment securities during the year ended December 31, 2017.

(4)  Includes cash paid for patent and trademark costs during the applicable year.

(5)  Includes the amortization of patent costs for all five years presented and includes the amortization of patent costs and license fees for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

36

7.

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Form 10-K, including “Risk Factors,” and the Financial Statements and notes thereto. The various sections of this discussion contain a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Forward-Looking Statements.“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factor Summary.” Our actual results may differ materially. For purposes of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, references to the “Company,” “we,” us” or “our” refer to the operations of 22nd Century Group, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries for the periods described herein.

($ in thousands, except per share data or unless otherwise specified)

36

Executive Overview

On December 23, 2021, the FDA issued modified risk granted orders for our reduced nicotine cigarettes, VLN® King and VLN® Menthol King. In addition to authorizing the Company to market VLN® cigarettes with the claim, “95% less nicotine”, to clarify the purpose of the brand, the FDA also required the use of the claim, “Helps You Smoke Less.”
Commenced pilot market sales in Chicago during the first quarter of 2022 of VLN® King and VLN® Menthol King 95% reduced nicotine content cigarettes, the first and only FDA authorized MRTP designated combustible cigarettes, and subsequently expanded sales and distribution channels throughout 2022 and 2023 to more than 5,000 stores across 26 states.
In December 2023, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the GVB hemp/cannabis business (referred to as the “GVB Divestiture”) to Specialty Acquisition Corporation, exiting the hemp/cannabis market and focusing fully on the Company’s tobacco operations.
Appointed Larry Firestone as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in November 2023, and announced plans for a turnaround in the business, including cost reductions and efforts to reposition the company’s business to focus on its VLN assets and CMO business.

Tobacco Business OverviewHighlights

Continued a multi-state VLN® rollout strategy, having launched sales in more than 5,000 locations across 26 states at year-end 2023, aimed at penetrating geographies and markets with large adult smoker populations, including those with favorable MRTP state excise tax savings, which can be used toward consumer incentives, distribution support, and additional programming to raise awareness of VLN® products.
Initiated agreements with national-scale C-store distribution partners, including Core-Mark/Eby-Brown, McLane and others pending, to facilitate state-wide or multi-state launches of VLN® at hundreds of stores within our target markets in an accelerated timeline.
Launched a private label premium cigarette brand, Pinnacle, for sale at one of the nation’s top 10 gas station convenience store chains, comprising almost 1,700 stores in 27 states.
Announced expansion into Texas, California and Florida, expected in conjunction with the largest multi-state U.S. C-store chain leveraging these new national scale distribution capabilities.
Secured additional retail point of sale placements with regional C-stores, such as Texas based CEFCO, and new regional distribution agreements with Hub, Inc., serving regional Midwestern and tribal accounts, and Chambers & Owen, Inc., serving the upper Midwest.  
Gained authorization to test VLN® sales at four United States military bases located in California, Arizona and North Carolina, beginning in the second quarter.
Launched sales at a top U.S. drugstore chain at approximately 1,200 locations across five states in the third quarter.
Poised to benefit from federal, state and international regulatory appetite for banning menthol and mandating reduced nicotine content. The Company has the only FDA-authorized combustible cigarette able to meet the stringent reduced nicotine content product standard under the FDA’s Comprehensive Plan requiring that all cigarettes be made “minimally or non-addictive.”
oProposed FDA menthol cigarette ban, in final rules status, could leave VLN® Menthol King as the only combustible menthol cigarette on the market, providing a critical off-ramp to help current menthol smokers to smoke less, a final decision is now expected in 2024.

37

Recent Business Divestiture

We are a plant biotechnology company focused on technology that allows us to increase or decrease

On December 22, 2023, we completed the levelsale of nicotine and other nicotinic alkaloids in tobacco plants andsubstantially all of the levelsassets of cannabinoids inthe GVB hemp/cannabis plants through genetic engineeringbusiness to Specialty Acquisition Corporation. As a result, we classified the results of operations of the hemp/cannabis segment and plant breeding. Our primary missiondisposal group as discontinued operations in tobacco isthe Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented and classified the related assets and liabilities associated with the discontinued operations as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. All results and information presented exclude the hemp/cannabis segment and disposal group unless otherwise noted.

Refer to reduceNote 2 “Discontinued Operations and Divestitures” of the harm caused by smoking. Our primary missionNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in hemp/cannabis is to develop proprietary hemp strainsItem 15 of this report for important potential new medicines and agricultural crops. We have an extensive intellectual property portfolioadditional information about the divestiture of issued patents and patent applications relating to the tobaccoGVB and hemp/cannabis plants.disposal group.

Financial Overview – Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results

37Net revenues for the fourth quarter of 2023 were $7,357, a decrease of 26.1% from $9,951 in 2022, primarily driven by a decrease in volumes of filtered cigars.
oFourth quarter 2023 cartons sold of 823 compared to 1,354 in the comparable prior year period.
Net revenues for the full year 2023 were $32,204, a decrease of 20.5% from $40,501 in 2022.
Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2023 was a loss of $7,829 compared to gross loss of $44 in the prior year period. 
Gross profit for the full year 2023 was a loss of $8,696, compared to a gross profit of $1,847 in 2022.
Total operating expenses for the fourth quarter 2023 decreased to $6,403 compared to $10,172 in the prior year quarter driven by:
oSales, general and administrative expenses decreased to $4,005 driven primarily by a decrease in personnel costs, strategic consulting, and sales and marketing due to our cost savings initiatives.
oResearch and development expenses decreased to $493, driven by a decrease in personnel expenses and costs associated with the Company’s research programs.
oOther operating expenses, net was $1,905, primarily reflecting restructuring costs of $1,871, including impairment and legal charges.

Operating loss for the fourth quarter 2023 was $14,232, compared to a loss of $10,216 in the prior year period.  Operating loss for the full year 2023 was $44,931, compared to a loss of $33,635 in the prior year.
Net loss in the fourth quarter of 2023 was $22,068, representing a net loss per share of $0.66 compared with net loss in the fourth quarter of 2022 of $11,114, representing a net loss per share of $0.77.  Net loss for the full year 2023 was $54,686, representing a net loss per share of $2.64 compared with net loss for the full year 2022 of $36,553, representing a net loss per share of $2.84.
As of December 31, 2023, we had $2,058 in cash and cash equivalents.

38

Our Financial Results

We currently are primarily involvedThe following table presents selected financial information derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, contained in the following activities:

·Facilitating the timely implementation of the plan by the FDA to require that all combustible cigarettes sold in the United States contain only minimally or non-addictive levels of nicotine;

·Continuing to work on a revised Modified Risk Tobacco Product application to be resubmitted to the FDA to obtain a reduced exposure marketing authorization for ourBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes to be marketed in the United States as “less addictive” and/or containing 95% less nicotine than conventional tobacco cigarettes;

·Seeking multiple, substantial licensing agreements for our tobacco technology and/or our proprietary tobaccos;

·Continuing to produceSPECTRUM® research cigarettes for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (“NIDA”), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), for use in independent clinical studies;

·Continuing to research and develop other novel tobacco plant varieties;

·Continuing to explore opportunities outside of the United States for the use of our Very Low Nicotine tobacco in potential over-the-counter cigarettes, such asBRAND A, or in a potential prescription-based, smoking cessation aid, such asX-22, in foreign countries that desire such potential products;

·Continuing to expand our legal hemp activities and development of unique plant varieties of hemp, including (i) hemp plants with low to no amounts of THC for the legal hemp industry, and (ii) hemp plants with high levels of cannabidiol (“CBD”) and other non-THC cannabinoids for the legal medical cannabinoid markets;

·Continuing to explore opportunities outside of the United States for the sale of our branded proprietary tobacco products, includingBRAND B,RED SUN andMAGIC cigarettes; and

·Continuing to grow our contract manufacturing business for third-party branded tobacco products.

Recent Developments

For the fourth quarter of 2017, our accomplishments and notable events include:

On October 6, 2017, we announced that Dr. Dorothy Hatsukami revealed preliminary findings of a 1,250-patient, 20-week study that employed ourSPECTRUM research cigarettes to compare smokers who were assigned to: (i) an immediate reduction to Very Low Nicotine cigarettes; (ii) gradual reduction in reduced nicotine content cigarettes; or (iii) normal nicotine content cigarettes. The detailsItem 15 of this Phase III study are under peer review prior to publication, but on October 5, 2017, atreport, for the 5th Annual Conference on Tobacco Science at the Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Dr. Hatsukami publicly stated that “an immediate approach [to nicotine reduction] is most likely to lead to less harm.” Dr. Hatsukami also publicly stated that the study data indicates compensatory smoking is less likely to occurperiods presented (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year Ended

December 31

December 31

Change

    

2023

    

2022

$

%

Revenues, net

$

32,204

$

40,501

(8,297)

(20.5)

Cost of goods sold

40,900

38,654

2,246

5.8

Gross (loss) profit

(8,696)

1,847

(10,543)

NM

Gross (loss) profit as a % of revenues, net

(27.0)

%

4.6

%

Operating expenses:

Sales, general and administrative ("SG&A")

31,064

32,231

(1,167)

(3.6)

SG&A as a % of revenues, net

96.5

%

79.6

%

Research and development ("R&D")

2,644

3,578

(934)

(26.1)

R&D as a % of revenues, net

8.2

%

8.8

%

Other operating expenses (income), net ("OOE")

2,527

(327)

2,854

NM

Total operating expenses

36,235

35,482

753

2.1

Operating loss from continuing operations

(44,931)

(33,635)

(11,296)

33.6

Operating loss as a % of revenues, net

(139.5)

%

(83.0)

%

Other income (expense):

Other income (expense), net

334

(366)

700

(191.3)

Realized loss on Panacea investment

-

(2,789)

2,789

NM

Loss on transfer of promissory note

(895)

-

(895)

NM

Interest income, net

219

313

(94)

(30.0)

Interest expense

(9,366)

(55)

(9,311)

NM

Total other expense

(9,708)

(2,897)

(6,811)

235.1

Loss before income taxes

(54,639)

(36,532)

(18,107)

49.6

Provision for income taxes

47

21

26

NM

Net loss from continuing operations

(54,686)

(36,553)

(18,133)

49.6

Net loss as a % of revenues, net

(169.8)

%

(90.3)

%

Net loss per common share from continuing operations (basic and diluted)*

$

(2.64)

$

(2.84)

0.20

(7.04)

NM - calculated change not meaningful

Fiscal 2023 Compared with an immediate reduction in nicotine, and that the there was a “greater likelihood of more rapid smoking cessation” with the immediate approach to nicotine reduction. We provided all the research cigarettes used in this Phase III study.Fiscal 2022

38

On October 9, 2017, we announced that we entered into an agreement with institutional investors to receive approximately $54 million in gross proceeds in a registered direct offering through the sale of 20.57 million shares of common stock at a price of $2.625 per share. This no-warrant financing was the largest capital raise in our history and increased our cash balance to more than $60 million.

On October 19, 2017, we announced that the University of Virginia (“UVA”) completed its first successful harvest of the Company’s hemp plants and identified several promising hemp varieties that could form the foundation for commercial hemp production throughout the legacy tobacco belt region of the United States. The 22nd Century-UVA hemp field trials used multiple oil and fiber varieties of hemp. Our hemp harvest with UVA identified proprietary varieties of hemp that have excellent agronomic properties for growth in Virginia. 22nd Century and UVA will use the most promising varieties for expanded hemp plantings in 2018. We are also working with UVA on the development of high-value medicinal cannabinoid varieties of hemp and specialized cannabinoid extraction processes for use in human therapeutics.

On November 2, 2017, we announced the hiring of James E. Swauger, Ph.D., as our Senior Vice President of Science and Regulatory Affairs. Dr. Swauger was previously the leader of the scientific and regulatory functions at Reynolds American Inc. (“Reynolds”). Dr. Swauger’s career with Reynolds spanned 23 years and included management positions in science and regulatory affairs. From 2008 through 2016, while serving as the Vice President of Regulatory Oversight, Dr. Swauger managed the creation, submission and oversight of numerous scientific applications and regulatory filings with the FDA and other federal, state, and local regulatory agencies. Dr. Swauger received his Ph.D. Degree in Biochemical Toxicology from The Johns Hopkins University in 1990 and his Bachelor of Science Degree in Toxicology (Magna cum laude) from Northeastern University in 1985. Dr. Swauger’s primary responsibilities are to lead and oversee our scientific and regulatory affairs, plant biotechnology, research and development, and external scientific activities, including re-submitting to the FDA our Modified Risk Tobacco Product application forBRAND A Very Low Nicotine cigarettes.

On November 30, 2017, we announced that we had shipped 2.4 millionSPECTRUM® research cigarettes for NIDA, which is part of NIH. As a subcontractor under federal government contracts, we have supplied proprietarySPECTRUM® research cigarettes for NIDA since 2011. TheSPECTRUM® product line consists of a series of 24 cigarette styles (11 regular and 13 menthol versions) that have 8 different levels of nicotine – from very low to high. 

On December 4, 2017, we announced the hiring of Juan Sanchez Tamburrino, Ph.D., as our Vice President of Research and Development. Dr. Tamburrino was previously the head of the Plant Biotechnology Division of British American Tobacco (NYSE: BTI). Dr. Tamburrino earned his Ph.D. Degree in molecular biology and genetics at the Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences at Cornell University, a partnership program with the Sloan Kettering Cancer Research Institute. After completing six years of post-doctoral research in plant biology at the Rockefeller University in New York, Dr. Tamburrino served as an Associate Professor at Universidad Tarapacá in Chile before becoming the Research Manager at Pioneer Hi-Bred International (a DuPont company now known as DuPont Pioneer). Dr. Tamburrino will be an integral part of our scientific and regulatory team working on our resubmission to the FDA of our Modified Risk Tobacco Product application forBRAND AVery Low Nicotine cigarettes, and our continuing research and development of improved Very Low Nicotine tobacco plants.

39

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016 and Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Revenue - Sale of products, net

 

Year Ended

 

December 31

December 31

    

2023

    

2022

Revenues, net

$

32,204

$

40,501

2017 vs. 2016

We realized netTobacco revenue was $32,204, a decrease of 20.5% from the sale of products$40,501 in the amount of $16,600,244 during theprior year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to net revenues of $12,279,979 during the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $4,320,265, or 35.2%. Included in net revenue wereperiod, reflecting lower unit sales ofSPECTRUM® research cigarettes in the amount of $325,320 and $328,912 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase in net revenue from the sale of products for 2017 was primarily the result of additional net sales revenue generated from a new contract to manufacture existing brands of filtered cigars that began in mid-May of 2017.

2016 vs. 2015

We realized net revenue from the sale of products in the amount of $12,279,979 during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to net revenues of $8,521,998 during the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $3,757,981, or 44.1%. Included in net revenue were sales ofSPECTRUM® research cigarettes in the amount of $328,912 and $242,658 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in net revenue from sales of products for 2016 was primarily due to the sale of products from the continued growth of our contract manufacturing operations in our North Carolina factory.

Costs of goods sold - Products

2017 vs. 2016

During the year ended December 31, 2017, cost of goods sold were $17,308,156, or 104.3% of net revenue. Excise taxes and certain regulatory fees in the approximate amount of $8,533,000 are included in the cost of goods sold. We were not operating the factory at full production capacity during 2017, but we began utilizing a portion of the excess capacity as a result of a planned reallocation in production resources during 2023 at the newCompany’s NASCO facilities away from lower margin filtered cigar contract manufacturing agreement that commenced in mid-Maycigars to higher margin VLN® and conventional cigarette products. Full year 2023 cartons sold were of 2017. As a result, the cost of goods sold, which included the cost of raw material components, direct manufacturing costs and an overhead allocation, was in excess of net sales revenue. Additionally, included3,459 compared to 5,782 in the costcomparable prior year period.

39

Gross profit

Year Ended

December 31

December 31

    

2023

2022

Gross (loss) profit

$

(8,696)

$

1,847

Percent of Revenues, net

(27.0)

%

4.6

%

The decrease in gross profit and gross profit as a net write offpercent of obsolete finished goods and raw materials inventory in the approximate amount of $257,000, resulting in an increase in the cost of goods sold by such amount.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of goods sold were $12,709,678, or 103.5% ofrevenues, net revenue. Excise taxes and certain regulatory fees in the approximate amount of $7,452,000 are included in the cost of goods sold. We were not operating the factory at full production capacity during 2016. As a result, the cost of goods sold, which included the cost of raw material components, direct manufacturing costs and an overhead allocation, was in excess of net sales revenue. Additionally, included in the cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2016 is an increase in inventory reserves in the amount of $145,000.

40

2016 vs. 2015

During the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of goods sold were $12,709,678, or 103.5% of net revenue. Excise taxes and certain regulatory fees in the approximate amount of $7,452,000 are included in the cost of goods sold. We were not operating the factory at full production capacity during 2016. As a result, the cost of goods sold, which included the cost of raw material components, direct manufacturing costs and an overhead allocation, was in excess of net sales revenue. Additionally, included in the cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2016 is an increase in inventory reserves in the amount of $145,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, cost of goods sold were $9,102,560, or 106.8% of net revenue. Excise taxes and certain regulatory fees in the approximate amount of $5,703,000 are included in the cost of goods sold. We were not operating the factory at full production capacity during 2015. As a result, the cost of goods sold, which included the cost of raw material components, direct manufacturing costs and an overhead allocation, was in excess of net sales revenue. 

Research and development expense

2017 vs. 2016

Research and development expense was $3,366,468 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $1,025,510, or 43.8%, from $2,340,958 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily the result of an increase in sponsored research costs and testing costs in the approximate amount of $441,000, a net write off of approximately $335,000 of our proprietary leaf inventory, an increase in laboratory expenses in the approximate amount of $102,000, an increase in payroll and payroll related costs of approximately $118,000, an increase in costs related to our modified risk tobacco products of approximately $59,000 and an increase in equity based compensation of approximately $46,000, partially offset by a decrease in license and royalty fees in the approximate amount of $63,000 and a decrease in legal expenses of approximately $26,000, during the year ended December 31, 2017, as2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2022, was primarily driven by lower volume due to an intentional shift during 2023 in product mix. In connection with evaluation of strategic alternatives and tobacco focused restructuring efforts, during the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company increased the reserve for excess, obsolete or expired leaf inventory by $7,720.

Sales, general and administrative expense

Changes From Prior Year

Compensation and benefits (a)

$

(2,239)

Strategic consulting (b)

(393)

Sales and marketing (c)

986

Administrative, public company and other expenses (d)

274

Legal (e)

205

Net decrease in SG&A expenses

$

(1,167)

2016 vs. 2015

(a) Decreases in compensation and benefits primarily resulted from $3,200 benefit of lower equity based compensation expense due to current year headcount reduction and forfeitures, and compared with prior year accelerated vesting of an employee’s outstanding equity awards as part of a termination severance agreement; $218 decrease in severance expenses offset by an increase of $1,179 in personnel costs due to increased headcount during the year compared to the prior year period.

(b) Decrease of strategic consulting due to restructuring efforts and implementation of cost savings initiatives.

(c) Increased sales and marketing related to expansion of VLN®.

(d) Other expenses increased due to $291 of technology expenses, $579 in public company fees, $270 of facilities expense offset by a decrease in insurance expenses of $469 and other of $397.

(e) Increased legal expenses due to regulatory compliance, business development, and contract matters.

40

Research and development expense was $2,340,958

Changes From Prior Year

Compensation and benefits (a)

$

(164)

Royalty, license and contract costs (b)

(376)

Consulting and professional services (c)

(478)

Other

84

Net decrease in R&D expenses

$

(934)

(a) Decreased compensation and benefits primarily related to personnel bonus expense of $255 in the prior year period as compared to $0 in the current year.

(b) Decreased expenses primarily due to a decrease in royalty fees due in the current year period.

(c) Decreased consulting due to an evaluation of strategic opportunities related to our tobacco patent portfolio that occurred in the period year period.

Other operating expenses (income), net

Year Ended

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Restructuring costs:

Impairment of intangible assets

$

1,375

$

35

Impairment of fixed assets

56

-

Professional services

763

-

Severance

221

-

Total Restructuring costs (a)

2,415

35

Acquisition and transaction costs (b)

223

Gain on sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment (c)

(111)

(362)

Total other operating expenses (income), net

$

2,527

$

(327)

NM - calculated change not meaningful

(a)During the second half of 2023, the Company undertook various restructuring activities in an effort to better align its internal organizational structure and costs with its strategy, as well as preserve liquidity.As a result, the Company incurred $2,415 in restructuring costs for the year ended December 31, 2023, which included costs related to employee termination, professional services and consulting, and long-lived asset impairment.  

(b)Acquisition and transaction costs primarily relate to professional fees incurred in connection with potential capital markets transactions.

(c)Reflects gain on sale resulting from sale of older manufacturing equipment.

Refer to Note 18, “Other operating expenses, net,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 15 of this report for additional information regarding these charges.

41

Other income (expense)

Changes From Prior Year

Other income (expense):

Realized loss on Panacea investment (a)

$

(2,789)

Other income (expense), net (b)

(700)

Loss on transfer of promissory note (c)

895

Interest income, net

94

Interest expense (d)

9,311

Net increase in other expense

$

6,811

(a)Realized loss on PLSH investment reflects the change in fair value and write-off of our investment in PLSH common stock during the year ended December 31, 2022 of $2,340 and extinguishment of note receivable of $500 less adjusted discount of $51.

(b)Other income (expense), net includes a decrease of $336 of realized losses on short-terms investments and $364 gain on change in fair value of warrant liability.

(c)In connection with the Senior Secured Credit Facility October Amendment, the Company assigned $3,800 PLSH promissory note less unamortized discount of $305, and corresponding pay down of indebtedness on outstanding principal of $600 and redemption of the related warrant liability of $2,000 resulting in loss on sale of financial asset of $895.

(d)Interest expense increased in 2023, as compared to the prior year period, primarily due to the cash interest of $1,104 and non-cash interest of $2,087 recognized from the Senior Secured Credit Facility (of these totals, $366 of interest was allocated to discontinued operations), and additional charges of $5,158 for extinguishment of debt and $557 of derivative liability in connection with the December Amendment. Additionally, interest expense increased as a result of PIK interest of $695 recognized from the Subordinated Note.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and expect to incur additional losses until such time that we can generate significant revenue and profit in our tobacco business. We had negative cash flow from operations of $54,987 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2023 and an increaseaccumulated deficit of $769,593, or 49.0%, from $1,571,365 for the year ended$378,707 as of December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily the result2023. As of an increase in sponsored research costs and testing costs in the approximate amount of $235,000, an increase in royalty and license fees of approximately $269,000, an increase in payroll and payroll related costs of approximately $238,000, an increase in consulting fees of approximately $74,000, an increase in R&D related travel expenses of approximately $48,000, an increase in legal fees of approximately $26,000 and an increase in expenses associated with our laboratory established in 2016 in the approximate amount of $72,000, partially offset by a decrease in equity based compensation in the approximate amount of $31,000 and a decrease in modified risk costs of approximately $174,000, during the year ended December 31, 2016,2023, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,058, and working capital of ($6,826) (compared to working capital of $22,079 at December 31, 2022). Given our projected operating requirements and existing cash and cash equivalents, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as compareda going concern through one year following the date that the Consolidated Financial Statements herein are issued.

In response to these conditions, management is currently evaluating different strategies for reducing expenses, as well as pursuing financing strategies which include raising additional funds through the issuance of securities, asset sales, and through arrangements with strategic partners. If capital is not available to the year ended December 31, 2015.

GeneralCompany when, and administrative expense

2017 vs. 2016

General and administrative expense was $7,116,535 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $923,266, or 14.9%, from $6,193,269 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in payroll and payroll related benefits of approximately $858,000, an increase in travel expenses of approximately $79,000, an increase in annual meeting costs and seminars and conference fees of approximately $84,000 and a net increase in various other general and administrative expenses of approximately $15,000, partially offset by a decrease in equity based compensation of approximately $69,000 and a decrease in legal and accounting fees of approximately $44,000, during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

41

2016 vs. 2015

 General and administrative expense was $6,193,269 for the year ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $1,566,858, or 20.2%, from $7,760,127 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in equity based compensation to third-party service providers in the approximate amount of $2,238,000 (approximately $1,979,000 of the decrease pertained to the Crede consulting fee), a decrease in employee equity based compensation of approximately $428,000, a decrease in payroll and employee related costs of approximately $237,000, a decrease in legal and accounting fees of approximately $33,000, and a decrease in NYSE American related costs of approximately $65,000, partially offset by an increase in investor relations costs of approximately $931,000, an increase in consulting fees of approximately $150,000, an increase relating to press release costs of approximately $50,000, an increase in costs relating to information technology of approximately $40,000, an increase in general business insurance of approximately $17,000, an increase in director fees of approximately $98,000 and a net increase in various other general and administrative expenses of approximately $148,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Sales and marketing costs

2017 vs. 2016

Sales and marketing costs were $1,161,952 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of 419,789, or 26.5%, from $1,581,741 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in the sales and marketing costs were primarily the result of a decrease in advertising and promotion costs of approximately $529,000 and a decrease in travel related costs of approximately $48,000, partially offset by an increase in payroll and expenses related to payroll of approximately $89,000 and an increase in equity-based compensation of approximately $78,000, during the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

2016 vs. 2015

Sales and marketing costs were $1,581,741 for the year ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $224,223, or 16.5%, from $1,357,518 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the sales and marketing costs were primarily the result of an increase of payroll and expenses related to payroll of approximately $312,000, an increase in equity based compensation of approximately $15,000, partially offset by a decrease in advertising and promotion of costs of approximately $103,000 during the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

Depreciation

2017 vs. 2016

Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $353,435, an increase of $27,311, or 8.4%, from $326,124 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase is primarily due to additional depreciation expenses on some assets acquired and placed in service during 2017 and a full year of depreciation expense taken on assets acquired during 2016. Machinery and equipment acquired during 2017 in the amount of $1,234,819 related primarily to packing equipment at our factory in North Carolina that was not placed in service during 2017 and is expected to be placed in service during the first quarter of 2018.

2016 vs. 2015

Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 amounted to $326,124, an increase of $6,425, or 2.0%, from $319,699 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase is primarily due to additional depreciation expensed on newly acquired assets during the year ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $204,994.

42

Amortization

2017 vs. 2016

Amortization expense, relating to amortization taken on capitalized patent costs and license fees, for the year ended December 31, 2017amounted to $593,562, an increase of $77,506, or 15.0%, from $516,056 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase is primarily due to amortization on additional patent costs incurred during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 in the amounts needed, it could be required to liquidate inventory or assets, cease or curtail operations, seek to negotiate new business deals with our business partners or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or similar state proceedings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the capital it needs to continue operations. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue in operations. Management’s plans do not alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through one year following the date that the Consolidated Financial Statements are issued.

42

Our cash and $541,882, respectively.

2016 vs. 2015

Amortization expense, relating to amortization taken on capitalized patent costsshort-term investments, and license fees, for the year endedworking capital as of December 31, 2016amounted to $516,056, an increase of $61,444, or 13.5%, from $454,612 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily due to amortization on additional patent costs incurred during the years ended December 31, 20162023, and 2015 in the amounts of $541,882 and $654,069, respectively.2022, are set forth below:

December 31

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,058

$

2,205

Short-term investment securities

$

 

$

18,193

Working capital

$

(6,826)

 

$

22,079

Warrant liability (loss) gain - net

2017 vs. 2016

The warrant liability loss of $157,809 for the year ended December 31, 2017 was due to the increase in the estimated fair value of the warrants during the year. The increase in the estimated fair value of the warrants was primarily attributable to an increase in our underlying stock price from $1.09 per share at December 31, 2016, as compared to $2.80 per share at December 31, 2017, and with the expiration of certain warrants during 2017.

The warrant liability gain of $29,615 for the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the decrease in the estimated fair value of certain outstanding warrants during the year. The decrease in the estimated fair value of the warrants was primarily attributable to a decrease in our underlying stock price from $1.40 per share at December 31, 2015, as compared to $1.09 per share at December 31, 2016, and with certain warrants aging closer to their expiration dates with the passage of time.

2016 vs. 2015

 The warrant liability gain of $29,615 for the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the decrease in the estimated fair value of the warrants during the year. The decrease in the estimated fair value of the warrants was primarily attributable to a decrease in our underlying stock price from $1.40 per share at December 31, 2015, as compared to $1.09 per share at December 31, 2016, and with the expiration of certain warrants during 2016.

The warrant liability gain of $144,550 for the year ended December 31, 2015 was due to the decrease in the estimated fair value of certain outstanding warrants during the year. The decrease in the estimated fair value of the warrants was primarily attributable to a decrease in our underlying stock price from $1.65 per share at December 31, 2014, as compared to $1.40 per share at December 31, 2015, and with certain warrants aging closer to their expiration dates with the passage of time.

43

Settlement proceeds

2017 vs. 2016

There were no settlement proceeds during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

2016 vs. 2015

On April 10, 2015, we entered into a settlement of legal disputes with an unrelated third-party pursuant to which the third-party became obligated to pay us a total of $1,000,000. During 2015, we received payments under the settlement in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 in full settlement of the dispute.

Gain (loss) on investment

2017 vs. 2016

On February 17, 2017, a dilutive event reduced our ownership in Anandia to 19.4%, an ownership percentage below the 20% ownership threshold for the use of the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, we discontinued applying the equity method of accounting for our equity investment in Anandia, effective on the date of the dilutive event. We recorded a gain on investment of $16,872 for year ended December 31, 2017 (the gain for the year ended December 31, 2017, reflects our proportionate gain through February 16, 2017). In addition, and as a result of the February 17, 2017 dilutive event, we recorded a gain in accordance with the derecognition provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 323 (“ASC 323”) in the amount of $336,834. We recorded a total gain on the investment in the amount of $346,180 for the year ended December 31, 2017 (pertains to the period up to February 17, 2017) by aggregating the Company’s share of Anandia’s gain, the gain recorded under ASC 323 and the amortization of the intangible asset represented by the difference between our equity investment in Anandia and our portion of the net assets of Anandia in the amount of $7,526. On July 25, 2017 another dilutive event occurred resulting in an additional reduction in our ownership in Anandia to 19%.

The loss on equity investment of $202,338 for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of (i) our 24.4% (25.0% ownership prior to a dilutive event on September 8, 2016) share of Anandia’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $144,690, and (ii) amortization of the intangible asset represented by the difference between our equity investment in Anandia and our portion of the net assets of Anandia in the amount of $57,648.

2016 vs. 2015

The loss on equity investment of $202,338 for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of (i) our 24.4% (25.0% ownership prior to a dilutive event on September 8, 2016) share of Anandia’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $144,690, and (ii) amortization of the intangible asset represented by the difference between our equity investment in Anandia and our portion of the net assets of Anandia in the amount of $57,648.

The loss on equity investment of $95,684 for the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of (i) our 25% share of Anandia’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 in the amount of $38,036, and (ii) amortization of the intangible asset represented by the difference between our equity investment in Anandia and our portion of the net assets of Anandia in the amount of $57,648.

44

Unrealized loss on short-term investment securities

2017 vs. 2016

Unrealized loss on short-term investment securities was $3,618 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. As a result of capital raised from a registered direct offering in October of 2017, we invested excess cash in various interest-bearing short-term investment securities. The unrealized loss results from the change in fair value of our investment in certain corporate and U.S. government agency bonds.

2016 vs. 2015

There was no unrealized loss on short-term investment securities during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Interest income

2017 vs. 2016

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $115,098, an increase of $98,213, or 581.7%, from interest income of $16,885 for the year ended December 31, 2016. As a result of capital raised from a registered direct offering in October of 2017, we invested excess cash in various interest-bearing short-term investment securities. Due to such additional investments, interest income was substantially greater during 2017 as compared to 2016.

2016 vs. 2015

Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $16,885, a decrease of $14,313, or 45.9%, from interest income of $31,198 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The interest income earned in both 2016 and 2015 was generated from excess cash invested in a money market account.

Interest expense

2017 vs. 2016

Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2017 to $29,104 from $37,745 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease of $8,641 was due to a decrease in the interest component of severance payments, where the severance accrual had previously been recorded on a discounted basis using our incremental borrowing rate and a decrease in interest accreted on a note payable.

2016 vs. 2015

Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $37,745 from $52,982 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease of $15,237 consisted primarily of a decrease of approximately $8,000 in the interest component of severance payments, where the severance accrual had previously been recorded on a discounted basis using our incremental borrowing rate and a decrease of approximately $7,000 on a demand bank loan that was paid off in December of 2015.

45

Net loss

2017 vs. 2016

We had a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 of $13,029,117 as compared to a net loss of $11,581,430 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in the net loss of $1,447,687, or 12.5%, was primarily the result of the increase in gross loss of approximately $278,000, an increase in operating expenses of $1,634,000, partially offset by a net decrease in other expenses of approximately $464,000.

2016 vs. 2015

We had a net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $11,581,430 as compared to a net loss of $11,031,931 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the net loss of $549,499, or 5.0%, was primarily the result of the decrease in settlement proceeds of $1,000,000 and a net increase in other expenses of approximately $206,000, offset by a decrease in our gross loss of approximately $151,000 and a net decrease in operating expenses in the amount of approximately $505,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

As of December 31, 2017,2023, we had positiveworking capital, excluding assets and liabilities held for sale, of approximately ($6,826) compared to working capital of approximately $63.3 million compared to positive working capital$22,079 as of approximately $13.5 million at December 31, 2016, an increase2022, a decrease of approximately $49.8 million.$28,905. This increasedecrease in working capital is due to anprimarily driven by the decrease in short-term investment securities resulting from cash burn, increase in current assetsportion of approximately $50.8 million, which is primarily due to a net increaselong-term debt, and other normal fluctuations from operations in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities of approximately $49.2 million, an increase in net accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Summary of approximately $0.9 million, an increase in net inventory of approximately $0.2 million and an increase of prepaid expenses and other assets of approximately $0.5 million, partially offset by a net increase in current liabilities of approximately $1.0 million. The net increase in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities is primarily the result of cash generated from a registered direct offering in October of 2017 resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $50.7 million and net proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants during 2017 of approximately $12.4 million, reduced byCash Flow

Year Ended

December 31, 

Change

    

2023

    

2022

$

Cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities

$

(54,987)

$

(51,714)

(3,273)

Investing activities

 

16,816

 

 

22,578

(5,762)

Financing activities

 

37,209

 

 

30,820

6,389

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

(962)

 

$

1,684

Net cash used in operating activities of approximately $12.1 million, cash used to acquire patents, trademarks and machinery and equipment of approximately $1.6 million, and $0.3 million used for payment on the note payable.

We must successfully execute our business plan to increase revenue in order to achieve positive cash flows from operations to sustain adequate liquidity without requiring additional funds from capital raises and other external sources to meet minimum operating requirements. On December 30, 2016, we filed a Form S-3, universal shelf registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that was declared effective by the SEC on January 17, 2017. The universal shelf registration statement will allow, but not compel, the Company to raise up to $100 million of capital over a three-year period ending January 17, 2020 through a wide array of securities at times and in amounts to be determined by the Company. Following the October 2017 registered direct offering, the universal shelf registration has approximately $46 million of remaining capacity. If required, there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all.

Cash demands on operations

We had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities at December 31, 2017 of $62,635,047. We believe this amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment securities will be adequate to sustain normal operations and meet all current obligations as they come due for a number of years. During the year ending December 31, 2017, we experienced an operating loss of approximately $13,300,000 and used cash in operations of approximately $12,068,000. Excluding discretionary expenses relating to R&D, patent and trademark costs, contract growing of our proprietary tobacco, modified risk tobacco products and certain nonrecurring expenses relating to factory capital expenses, investor relations and marketing costs, our monthly cash expenditures are approximately $925,000. 

46

Net Cash used in operating activities

2017 vs. 2016

Inoperations increased $3,273 from $51,714 in 2022 to $54,987 in 2023. The primary driver for this increase was higher net loss of $80,974, driven by increased spending in SG&A and R&D both from the year ended December 31, 2017, $12,068,383acquisition of cash was used in operating activities as compared to $9,887,580GVB and acceleration of cash used in operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2016;launch of VLN®, an increase of $2,180,803. The increase in use of cash in operations was primarily due$67,866 related to the increase in the cash portion of thenet adjustments to reconcile net loss in the amount of $1,894,341to cash, and an increase in cash used fromfor working capital components related to operations in the amount of $286,462,$9,835 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the year end December 31, 2016.

2016 vs. 2015

In the year ended December 31, 2016, $9,887,580 of cash was used in operating activities as compared to $7,321,811 of cash used in operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2015; an increase of $2,565,769. The increase in use of cash in operations was primarily due to the increase in the cash portion of the net loss in the amount of $2,881,706 offset by a decrease in cash used from working capital components related to operations in the amount of $315,937 for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to at year end December 31, 2015.

Net cash used in investing activities

2017 vs. 2016

In the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities was $60,586,245 as compared to $553,770 of cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cash used in investing activities of $60,032,474 was due to the purchase of short-term investment securities of $58,979,131, an increase in the cash used for the acquisition of machinery and equipment in the amount of $959,677 and an increase in cash used in the acquisition of patents and trademarks in the amount of $93,667, for the year ended December 31, 20172023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.2022.

43

2016 vs. 2015

In the year ended December 31, 2016, netNet cash used inprovided by investing activities was $553,770

Cash provided by investing activities amounted to $16,816 in 2023 as compared to $450,661 of cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in cash used inprovided by investing activities of $103,109 was due to an increase of $159,748$22,578 in 2022. The decrease in cash used forprovided by investing activities of $5,762 was primarily the acquisitionresult of machinery and equipment, partially offset by(i) a decrease in cash used innet proceeds from short-term investments of $10,338; (ii) $1,188 related to the acquisition of patents, trademarks and trademarksproperty, plant and equipment; and (iii) $126 of proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment. These decreased cash outflows were partially offset by an increase in cash inflows of (i) $3,500 of property, plant, and equipment casualty loss insurance proceeds collected in the amountcurrent year; (ii) $1,043 from the acquisition of $56,639, forRXP in the current year ended December 31, 2016 as compared toand GVB in the prior year ended December 31, 2015.period; (iii) $682 from the investment in Change Agronomy Ltd. in the prior year and (iv) $665 from proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations.

47

Net cash provided by financing activities

2017 vs. 2016

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we generated $62,845,974 from our2023, cash provided by financing activities as a result of net cash proceedsincreased by $6,389 resulting from the exercisenet proceeds of $16,048 from issuance of long-term debt, proceeds of $6,016 from issuance of detachable warrants, innet proceeds of $3,044 from warrant exercises, net proceeds of $2,563 from issuance of common stock related to the amountprior ATM facility, increased proceeds of $12,447,108 and net cash proceeds$198 from the October 2017 registered direct offeringissuance of notes payable, and a decrease in the amountother financing of $50,732,200, partially$29. These cash inflows were offset by a payment on adecrease in net proceeds of issuance of common stock of $9,605, payments of long-term debt of $9,700, increased note payable payments of $1,759, taxes paid related to net share settlement of RSUs of $271 and $174 of option exercises that occurred in the amount $333,334.2022.

Cash demands on operations

DuringAs of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $2,058 of cash and cash equivalents. Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from our tobacco contract manufacturing business and proceeds from debt and equity financing activities, which cash flows provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated $20,149,2412023 were $37,209.

44

As discussed above, in response to the cash demands on operations, management has implemented programs to evaluate strategic alternatives for the Company’s assets and cost cut initiatives intended to reduce our operating costs to provide additional cash runway. However, our cash, cash equivalents, potential business interruption insurance proceeds, and debt/equity financings, as well as the sustained tobacco contract manufacturing, currently are not forecasted to provide sufficient cash resources or liquidity for a period of twelve months from issuance of these consolidated financial statements.

Senior Secured Credit Facility

On March 3, 2023, the Company entered into that certain Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with JGB Partners, LP (“JGB Partners”), JGB Capital, LP (“JGB Capital”) and JGB Capital Offshore Ltd. (“JGB Offshore” and collectively with JGB Partners and JGB Capital, the “Holders”) and JGB Collateral, LLC, as collateral agent for the Holders (the “Agent”) which pursuant to the agreement, the Company sold 5% original issuance discount senior secured debentures with an aggregate principal amount of $21,053. The Debentures bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum, payable monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each month and on the maturity date. The Debentures mature on March 3, 2026. At the Company’s election, subject to certain conditions, interest can be paid in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof. The Debentures are subject to an exit payment equal to 5% of the original principal amount, or $1,053, payable on the maturity date or the date the Debentures are paid in full (the “Exit Payment”). Any time after, March 3, 2024, the Company may irrevocably elect to redeem all of the then outstanding principal amount of the Debentures for cash in an amount equal to the entire outstanding principal balance, including accrued and unpaid interest, the Exit Payment and a prepayment premium in an amount equal to 3% of the outstanding principal balance as of the prepayment date (collectively, the “Prepayment Amount”). Upon the entry into a definitive agreement that would effect a change in control (as defined in the Debentures) of the Company, the Agent may require the Company to prepay the outstanding principal balance in an amount equal to the Prepayment Amount. Commencing on May 1, 2024, at its option, the holder of a Debenture may require the Company to redeem 2% of the original principal amount of the Debentures per calendar month which amount may at the Company’s election, subject to certain exceptions, be paid in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof.

The JGB Warrants are exercisable for five years from September 3, 2023, at an exercise price of $19.125 per share, a 50% premium to the VWAP on the closing date, subject, with certain exceptions, to adjustments in the event of stock splits, dividends, subsequent dilutive offerings and certain fundamental transactions. As a result of the June 19, 2023 offering, the Company’s outstanding JGB warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share were automatically adjusted to be $12.828 exercise price for up to 496,960 shares of common stock. There are no further anti-dilution adjustments on such warrants. In connection with the JGB October Amendment, the Company and Holders agreed to exercise the outstanding put provision to redeem 166,667 Warrants for an aggregate put price equal to $2,500.

Following the JGB October and December Amendments (as further described in Note 13 “Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 15 of this report), as of December 31, 2023 the remaining principal loan balance is approximately $10,752, exit fee of $1,052 and remaining $500 of the put price will be due at maturity in March 2026 in accordance with the original terms of the debenture agreements. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has pledged to JGB the $2,000 GVB promissory note and $1,000 assignment of Needle Rock Farms to be applied as principal reduction in 2024.

Omnia Subordinated Note

On March 3, 2023, the Company executed a Subordinated Promissory Note (the “Subordinated Note”) with a principal amount of $2,865 in favor of Omnia Ventures, LP (“Omnia”). The Subordinated Note refinanced the 12% Secured Promissory Note with a principal amount of $1,000 dated as of October 29, 2021 payable to Omnia (the “October Note”) and the 12% Secured Promissory Note with a principal amount of $1,500 dated as of January 14, 2022 payable to Omnia (the “January Note”, and together with the October Note, the “Original Notes”), which were assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of GVB Biopharma.

45

Under the terms of the Subordinated Note, the Company is obligated to make interest payments in-kind (the “PIK Interest”). The PIK Interest accrues at a rate of 26.5% per annum, payable monthly. The Company is not permitted to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance on the Subordinated Note prior to maturity. The maturity date of the Subordinated Note is May 1, 2024.

In connection with the Subordinated Note, the Company issued to Omnia, warrants to purchase up to 45,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Omnia Warrants are exercisable for seven years from September 3, 2023, at an exercise price of $12.828 per share subject, with certain exceptions, to adjustments in the event of stock splits, dividends, subsequent dilutive offerings and certain fundamental transactions.

ATM Offering

On March 9, 2023 the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with Cowen and Company, LLC (the “Sales Agent”) under which the Company was previously able issue and sell in a registered offering shares of our financing activities primarilycommon stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $50,000 from time to time through or to the Sales Agent (the “ATM Offering”).  The Company paid 3.00% sales commission based on the gross proceeds of the sales price per share of common stock sold. Total net proceeds during the second quarter of 2023 were $2,563. On June 19, 2023, the Company terminated the ATM Program in connection with the June 2023 offering described below.

June 19, 2023 Registered Direct Offering  

On June 19, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of shares of approximately $5,300 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 747,974 shares of common stock and 747,974 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $7.05 per unit.  The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were approximately $4,800.

The warrants were exercisable immediately upon issuance at an exercise price of $7.05 per share of common stock, expire on June 22, 2028 and are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, including upon any subsequent equity sales at a price per share lower than the then effective exercise price of such warrants, then such exercise price shall be lowered to such price at which the shares were offered.

As part of the offering, the Company entered into a warrant reprice letter and agreed to reduce the exercise price on the previously issued 747,974 warrants owned by the investors participating in the Offering from $30.75 to $7.05 and to add a provision in the warrants that upon any subsequent equity sales at a price per share lower than the then effective exercise price of such warrants, such exercise price shall be lowered to such price at which the shares were offered. As a result of the offerings completed in July 2023, the exercise price on the 1,495,948 warrants was automatically adjusted to $2.42 per share and subsequently adjusted to $0.525 per share in October. All of the outstanding warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering.

The remaining 390,247 previously issued warrants were not repriced and remain at an exercise price of $30.75 on their original terms. On December 7, 2023, the Company was provided notice of irrevocable abandonment of 325,205 warrants.

In addition, as a result of the offering, the Company’s outstanding warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share were automatically adjusted as follows: $12.828 exercise price for up to 496,960 shares of common stock, of which 166,667 were redeemed in October 2023 (see above discussion of amendment and waiver under Senior Secured Credit Facility).

46

July 6, 2023 Registered Direct Offering.  

On July 6, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of approximately $3,000 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 778,634 shares of common stock and 1,557,268 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $3.80 per unit. The warrants are exercisable six months after issuance at an exercise price of $3.80 per share of common stock and expire on January 10, 2029. The net cash proceeds to the Company from the sale of units in three registered direct offerings in February, July and October of 2016 in the aggregate amount of $20,482,378, offset by a payment on a note payable in the amounts of $333,333.

2016 vs. 2015

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we generated $20,149,241 from our financing activities primarily asoffering were approximately $2,722. As a result of the subsequent offering completed in July 2023, the exercise price on the 1,557,268 warrants was automatically adjusted to $2.42 per share and subsequently adjusted to $0.525 per share in October. All of the outstanding warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering.

July 19, 2023 Registered Direct Offering.  

On July 19, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of approximately $11,700 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 4,373,219 shares of common stock and 8,746,438 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $2.67 per unit. The warrants are exercisable immediately at an exercise price of $2.42 per share of common stock and expire five years after issuance. The net cash proceeds to the Company from the sale of units in three registered direct offerings in February, July and October of 2016 in the aggregate amount of $20,482,378, offset by a payment on a note payable in the amounts of $333,333.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we generated $5,130,082 from our financing activities primarily asoffering were approximately $10,742. As a result of net cash proceeds from the salesubsequent offering completed in October 2023, the exercise price on the 8,746,438 warrants was automatically adjusted to $0.525 per share. 8,296,438 of unitsthe warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering.

October 2023 Public Offering

On October 17, 2023, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and issue, in a June 2015 registered directpublic offering, (i) an aggregate of 7,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, (ii) warrants to purchase 20,000,000 shares of common stock (the “Common Warrants”) and (iii) pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,400,000 shares of common stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”). The Common Warrants have an exercise price of $0.525, are immediately exercisable and have a term of exercise equal to five years following the original issuance date. The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price of $0.0001, are immediately exercisable and are exercisable at any time after their original issuance until such Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full. The shares were offered at a combined public offering price of $0.525 per share and two accompanying Common Warrants. The Pre-Funded Warrants were offered at a combined public offering price of $0.5249 per Pre-Funded Warrant and two accompanying Common Warrants.

In addition, the Company issued the placement agent warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the aggregate number of shares and Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the amountoffering) at an exercise price of $5,576,083,$0.65625, which represents 125% of the public offering price per share and accompanying Common Warrant. The placement agent agreed not to exercise the such warrants until the Company subsequently increases its authorized shares of common stock.

The offering closed on October 19, 2023 with gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $5,250, before deducting the placement agent fees of $367 and other offering expenses payable by the Company of approximately $288. As a result of the offering, the exercise price on 11,799,654 previously outstanding warrants were automatically adjusted from $2.42 per share to $0.525 per share.

The Pre-Funded Warrants were subsequently exercised on a cashless basis in October 2023, resulting in issuance of 2,399,512 shares of common stock. 17,300,000 of the October Warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering.

47

Warrant Inducement Offering

On November 28, 2023, the Company commenced a warrant inducement offering with the holders of the Company’s outstanding 31,779,654 warrants consisting of: (i) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about June 22, 2023; (ii) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about July 10, 2023; (iii) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about July 21, 2023; and/or (iv) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about October 19, 2023 (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”), which Existing Warrants are exercisable for an equal number of shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.525. The Company agreed to issue new warrants (the “Inducement Warrants”) to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock equal to 200% of the number of shares of common stock issued pursuant to the exercise by the holders of the Existing Warrants during the inducement period, for cash, providedat a reduced exercise price equal to the Nasdaq Minimum Price (as defined in the as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d)).

For the period from November 28, 2023 through February 15, 2024, the date of Stockholder Approval, the Company entered into warrant inducement agreements with certain holders of the Existing Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 28,649,654 shares of common stock at a reduced weighted average exercise price of $0.2010. Pursuant to the warrant inducement agreements, the exercising holders of the Existing Warrants received 57,299,308 Inducement Warrants at an exercise price of $0.1765 and the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $5,757 from the exercise of the Existing Warrants.

Outstanding Warrants

As of March 25, 2024, we had the following warrants inoutstanding:

# of warrants outstanding

Exercise price

Expiration date

July 2022 RDO warrants

65,042

$

30.75

July 25, 2027

Senior Secured Credit Facility - JGB

330,294

$

12.828

September 3, 2028

Subordinated Note - Omnia

45,000

$

12.828

September 3, 2030

July 19, 2023 RDO warrants

450,000

$

0.1765

July 20, 2028

October 2023 CMPO warrants

2,700,000

$

0.1765

October 19, 2028

Inducement warrants

57,299,308

$

0.1765

February 15, 2029

60,889,644

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In the amountnormal course of $50,688, andbusiness, we evaluate all new accounting pronouncements issued by the collection of an amount due from a related party inFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), SEC, or other authoritative accounting bodies to determine the amount of $46,069, offset by paymentspotential impact they may have on our demand bank loan and note payable inConsolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 1 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the amounts of $174,925 and $333,333, respectively.

48

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes by category our expected future cash outflows associated with contractual obligations in effect at December 31, 2017:

  Payments Due by Period 
     Year Ended  Years Ended  Years Ended    
     December 31,  December 31,  December 31,  More Than 
  Total  2018  2019 & 2020  2021 & 2022  Five Years 
                
Operating lease obligations (1)  974,649   295,475   525,486   153,688   - 
                     
Consulting agreements  815,000   488,000  171,000  156,000  - 
                     
License fees  2,880,000   265,000   590,000   645,000   1,380,000 
                     
Sponsored research (2)  893,188   556,191   336,997   -   - 
                     
Total $5,562,837  $1,604,666  $1,623,483  $954,688  $1,380,000 

(1) Does not include potential lease obligations due upon exercise of various lease option renewals.

(2) Does not include an additional $653,200 in sponsored research fees potentially dueNotes to Anandia under the Company's option to exercise the third-year optionConsolidated Financial Statements contained in the agreement with Anandia.Item 15 of this report for additional information about these recently issued accounting standards and their potential impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates

Management’s discussion and Estimates

Accounting principles generally acceptedanalysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, requireaccordance with GAAP. We make estimates and assumptions to be madein the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments upon historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in ourestimates or assumptions could result in a material adjustment to the consolidated financial statementsstatements.

48

We have identified several critical accounting estimates. An accounting estimate is considered critical if both: (a) the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and accompanying notes. Somejudgment involved, and (b) the impact of changes in the estimates and assumptions have had or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. This listing is not a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. For further information regarding the application of these estimates require difficult, subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and as a result, actual results could differ from those estimates. Due to the estimation processes involved, the following summarizedother accounting policies, and their application are considered to be critical to understanding our business operations, financial condition and resultssee Note 1 “Summary of operations.

Short-term Investment Securities

Our short-term investment securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and consist of money market funds, corporate bonds, U.S. government agency bonds and certificates of deposit with maturities greater than three months as the time of acquisition. Our short-term investment securities are carried at fair value within current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, with fair value based on quoted market prices. We view our available-for-sale securities as available for use in current operations regardlessSignificant Accounting Policies” of the stated maturity dateNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 15 of the security. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investment securities are reflected in other income (expense) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Net interest earned on the short-term investment securities are included in interest income,this report.

InventoryInventories

Inventories are valuedmeasured on a first-in, first-out basis at the lower of cost or net realizable value. CostNet realizable value is determined using an average cost methodthe estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The valuation of inventory requires us to estimate obsolete or excess inventory, as well as inventory that is not of saleable quality.

Historically, our adjustments or write-off charges recorded against inventory have been adequate to cover our losses. However, variations in methods or assumptions could have a material impact on our results. Additionally, if our demand forecasts for tobacco leaf inventory and raw materials inventory and standard cost is primarily used for finished goods inventory. Inventories are evaluated to determine whether any amounts are not recoverable based on slow moving or obsolete condition and are written off or reserved as appropriate.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from product sales at the point the product is shipped to a customer and title has transferred.  Revenue from the sale ofspecific products is recognized net of cash discounts, sales returnsgreater than actual demand and allowances. Cigarette and filtered cigar federal excise taxes and other regulatory fees in the approximatewe fail to reduce manufacturing output accordingly, we could be required to record additional inventory write-down or expense a greater amount of $8,533,000, $7,452,000overhead costs, which would negatively impact our gross profit and $5,703,000 are included in net sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, except on sales ofSPECTRUM® research cigarettes, exported cigarettes, exported filtered cigars and in-bond sales of filtered cigars to other federally licensed tobacco product manufactures, to which such taxes do not apply.income.

49

ImpairmentValuation of Long-Lived Assets

We reviewmake assumptions in establishing the carrying value, fair value and, if applicable, the estimated lives of our amortizingintangible and other long-lived assets. Intangible assets determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized. Instead, these assets are evaluated for impairment on an annual basis on December 1, the measurement date, and whenever events or business conditions change that could indicate that the asset is impaired. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost-carrying valuecarrying amount of an asset (asset group) may no longernot be recoverable.

Evaluation of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment

Our indefinite-lived intangible assets include the MSA, cigarette brand predicate and trademarks. We alsoperform an annual impairment review of our indefinite-lived intangible assets on December 1, the measurement date, unless events occur that trigger the need for an interim impairment review. We have the option to first assess recoverabilityqualitative factors in determining whether it is more-likely-than-not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If we elect not to use this option, or we determine that it is more-likely-than-not that the asset is impaired, we perform a quantitative assessment that requires us to estimate the fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset and compare that amount to its carrying value. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the asset by estimatingcarrying value over the fair value of these assets.

For our indefinite-lived intangible assets, we performed a qualitative evaluation and considered factors such as current and future sales projections, strategic objectives, future market and economic conditions, competition, and federal and state regulations. We determined as of December 1, 2023, it is more likely than not that that the assets are not impaired.

Evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment

When impairment indicators exist, we determine if the carrying value of the long-lived asset(s) including, but not limited to, PP&E, right-of-use lease assets, and definite-lived intangible asset(s) exceeds the related undiscounted netfuture cash flows. In cases where the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows, expectedthe carrying value is written down to result fromfair value. Fair value is generally determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. When it is determined that the useful life of an asset including eventual disposition. If(asset group) is shorter than the originally estimated future undiscounted netlife, and there are sufficient cash flows are less thanto support the carrying value of the asset an impairment loss is recorded equal(asset group), we accelerate the rate of depreciation/amortization in order to fully depreciate/amortize the difference betweenasset over its shorter useful life.

49

Estimation of the asset’s carrying valuecash flows and its fair value. Non-amortizing intangibles (e.g. trademarks) are reviewed annually for impairment. We have not recognized any impairment losses during the three-year period ended December 31, 2017.

Amortization Estimates of Intangible Assets

We generally determine amortization based on the estimated useful lives of thelong-lived assets and record amortization expensedefinite-lived intangible assets requires significant management judgment. Events could occur that would materially affect our estimates and assumptions. Unforeseen changes, such as the loss of one or more significant customers, technology obsolescence, or significant manufacturing disruption, among other factors, could substantially alter the assumptions regarding the ability to realize the return of our investment in long-lived assets, definite-lived intangible assets or their estimated useful lives.

For our long-lived assets, we determined that impairment indicators occurred during the fourth quarter of 2023 in connection with ongoing evaluation of our tobacco strategy and restructuring efforts and concluded that certain definite-lived intangible assets, including patents, were impaired due to obsolescence or abandonment in the amount of $1,375. No other long-lived assets were concluded to be non-recoverable based on undiscounted cash flow analysis performed.

Detachable Warrants

Warrants issued pursuant to debt or equity offerings that the Company may be required to redeem through payment of cash or other assets outside its control are classified as liabilities and therefore measured at fair value. The Company uses a straight-line method over such lives.Monte Carlo valuation model to estimate fair value at each issuance and period-end date. The remainingkey assumptions used in the model are the expected future volatility in the price of the Company’s shares and the expected life of the primary patent in each patent family is generally usedwarrants.

Embedded Derivatives – Conversion Option

Our December Amendment to determine the estimated useful life of the related patent costs.

Valuation of our Equity Securities

We use a fair-value based method to determine compensation for all arrangements under which Company employees and others receive shares, options or warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Equity based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period based on estimates of probability and time of achieving milestones and vesting. For accounting purposes, the shares will be considered issued and outstanding upon vesting.

Income taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for any basis differences in our assets and liabilities between tax and U.S. GAAP reporting, and for operating loss and credit carry-forwards. In light of our history of cumulative net operating losses and the uncertainty of their future utilization, we have established a valuation allowance to fully offset our net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We do not useSenior Secured Credit Facility contained an embedded derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks.conversion option. The Company evaluates all our financial instrumentseach debt agreement to determine if such instruments are derivativeswhether any embedded features require bifurcation from the debt host in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("ASC 815").If the embedded feature requires bifurcation from its debt host, the Company will account for it as either a derivative liability or contain features that qualify as a derivative in equity. The Company uses valuation models to estimate the fair value of the embedded derivatives. For the valuation to record the debt and embedded derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities,related to the derivative instrument is initially recordedconversion option at its fair market value and then is revalued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value, reported in the Consolidated StatementsCompany uses a binomial lattice model at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates inputs such as the stock price of Operations. The methodology for valuing our outstanding warrantsthe Company, risk-free interest rate, the effective debt yield and expected volatility. Certain inputs involve unobservable inputs and are classified as derivative instruments utilizes a lattice model approach which includes probability weighted estimates of future events, including volatility of our common stock.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlementlevel 3 of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve monthsfair value hierarchy (see Note 9, Fair Value Measurement to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in Item 15 of this Annual Report). The sensitivity of the balance sheet date.fair value calculation to these methods, assumptions, and estimates included could create materially different results under different conditions or using different assumptions.

Inflation

Inflation did not have a material effect on our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Arrangement

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

50

Item 7A.Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We are exposed to various market risks in the ordinary course of our business, which consist primarily of interest rate risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments and foreign exchange rate risk. Additionally, the value of our warrant liability is primarily based on the underlying price of our common stock and fluctuations in its value could impact our warrant liability expense.

QuInterest Ratealitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not believe we are exposed to material direct interest rate risk associated with changes in interest rates other than with respect to our cash equivalents and short-term investments securities. We invest excess cash in cash equivalents and short-term investment securities primarily consisting of money market funds, corporate bonds, U.S. government agency bonds and certificates of deposit that earn interest based on fluctuating interest rates. We believe changes in these interest rate will not have a material impact on our financial statements. Additionally, we have no interest rate sensitive debt, and as such, are not exposed to interest rate changes relating to debt instruments.Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Foreign Exchange RiskItem 8.

The majority of our revenues and expenses are transacted in in U.S. dollars. A small portion of our vendors are paid in foreigncurrencies. Our 19.0% investment in Anandia at December 31, 2017 has limited foreign currency risk. Anandia is a Canadian company using the Canadian dollar as its functional currency. We currently account for our investment in Anandia using the cost method, and as such, we have limited exposure to foreign currency risk. We do not believe that fluctuations in foreign currency rates associated with these non-U.S. dollar transaction will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Equity Risk

We have a warrant liability of $216,490 on our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017. This liability consists of a warrant liability associated with warrants issued by us. The fair value calculation, as discussed in Note 14 of our consolidated financial statements, of the warrants is exposed to market volatilities, changes in the price of our common stock, and interest rates. Only a small percentage of our outstanding warrants contain an anti-dilution clause that gives rise to the warrant liability (see Note 15 of our consolidated financial statements for additional details), and as such, our exposure to this risk is significantly mitigated. Additionally, the outstanding warrants associated with the warrant liability expire in August of 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we experienced a loss of $157,809 as a result of the change in the fair value of the warrant liability. A 10% increase or decrease in the volatility factor used as of December 31, 2017 would have the impact of increasing or decreasing the warrant liability by approximately $300.

Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The required financial statements and the notes thereto are contained in a separate section of this Form 10-K beginning with the page following Item 15 (Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, including Selected QuarterlySchedules) and are incorporated by reference into this Item 8.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Data).Disclosure.

None.

Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

50

Item 9A.

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K to ensure information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the SEC'sSEC’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

51

Management'sManagement’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

Freed Maxick CPA’s, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of their audit, has issued a report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

2023.

Our system of internal control over financial reporting was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a permanent exemption for smaller reporting companies.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the quarter ended December 31, 20172023 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’sour internal control over financial reporting.

52

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

22nd Century Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited 22nd Century Group Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established inInternal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows of the Company for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 of the Company and our report dated March 7, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.

Buffalo, New York

March 7, 2018

53

Item 9B.Item 9B.Other Information.

None.

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspection

Not applicable.

51

PART III

Item 10.

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Information concerning our executive officers, directors and corporate governance is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Set forth below is information regarding our directors, executive officers and key personnel as of March 6, 2018:

NameAgePosition
Henry Sicignano, III50President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
John T. Brodfuehrer60Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer
James E. Swauger, Ph. D.56Senior Vice President of Science and Regulatory Affairs
Thomas L. James, Esq.59Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Joseph Alexander Dunn, Ph.D.64Director*
James W. Cornell61Director**
Richard M. Sanders65Director***
Nora B. Sullivan60Director****

*  Dr. Dunn is currently Associate Dean for Research and Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences at D’Youville College of Pharmacy in Buffalo, New York and has served in this capacity since April 1, 2010.

** Mr. Cornell is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Praxiis, LLC, an enterprise that provides support for clients in organizational change, leadership development and transactional advisory services. Mr. Cornell is also the current Manager of Larkin Center Management, LLC, a real estate development company, and has served in this capacity since October 2010.

*** Since August 2009, Mr. Sanders has served as a General Partner of Phase One Ventures, LLC, a venture capital firm which focuses on nanotechnology and biotechnology start-up opportunities in New Mexico and surrounding states.

**** Since May 18, 2015, Ms. Sullivan is currently President of Sullivan Capital Partners, LLC, a financial services company providing investment banking and consulting services to privately held businesses and publicly traded entities. Focusing on activities and related strategic planning, due diligence and integration issues.

54

Code of Business Conduct and Corporate Ethics

In 2006, we adoptedOur Board of Directors has long maintained a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees. A copy of our Code of Ethics is available on our website at xxiicentury.com and will be providedhttp://www.xxiicentury.com. We intend to satisfy any person requesting same without charge. To request a copydisclosure requirements pursuant to Item 5.05 of our CodeForm 8-K regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, certain provisions of Ethics, please make a written request to our General Counsel, c/o 22nd Century Group, Inc., 8560 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221. Future material amendments or waivers relating to the Code of Ethics will be disclosedby posting such information on our website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.website.

Item 11.

Item 11.Executive Compensation.

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12.

Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 13.

Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 14.

Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Information is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K with respect to its 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

52

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Financial Statements

(b)
Financial Statement Schedules

55

Page

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID 0317)

F-1

Consolidated Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-2

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

F-3

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

F-4

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

F- 5

F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8–51

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not required.

(b)F- 6 - F-24Exhibits

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit Index below following the Financial Statements, which are incorporated herein by this reference.

53

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TheTo the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders

22ndof 22nd Century Group, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 22nd22nd Century Group, Inc.  and Subsidiariessubsidiaries (the "Company")Company) as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2023, and the related notes andto the schedule in item 15 (b)consolidated financial statements (collectively, referred to as the "financial statements")financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

WeGoing Concern

The accompanying financial statements have also audited,been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in accordance withNote 1 to the standards offinancial statements, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”),has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and expects to incur additional losses until such time that it can generate significant revenue and profit in its tobacco business. Further, the Company’s internal controls over financial reportingCompany has negative working capital and a shareholders’ deficit as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established2023. This raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by Committee regard to these matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Committee in 2013. Our report dated March 7, 2018 expressed an opinion that the Company had maintained effective internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based upon the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Committee in 2013.this uncertainty.  

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOBPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

 /s/ Freed Maxick, CPAs, P.C.Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-1

Debt related accounting, classification, and valuation

Critical Audit Matter description

As discussed in Note 1 and 13 of the consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2023, prior to the amendments described in Note 13, the Company entered into a senior secured credit facility, which consisted of a three-year debenture with a principal amount of $21,053 (as defined in Note 13) and a $2,865 subordinated promissory note (the “Subordinated Note). The Debentures were issued at a 5% original issuance discount and are subject to a 5% exit payment. In connection with the issuance with the Debentures and the Subordinated Note, the Company issued warrants to purchase common stock (“Detachable Warrants")  

The Debenture, Subordinated Note, and Detachable Warrants included various terms that required evaluation at the issuance date.  Further, a portion of the Detachable Warrants met the criteria for equity classification (Note 10), while a portion are treated as liabilities (Note 9) due to holder put features applicable to only a portion of the warrants issued.  The fair value of both classes of warrants was determined at the date of issuance and recorded as a debt discount.  The liability classified warrants were subsequently adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

We have servedidentified the accounting for the terms of the Debentures (prior to amendments), Subordinated Note, and Detachable Warrants as well as the Company's auditor since 2011.valuation and classification of the same as a critical audit matter. Auditing the accounting for these was especially challenging due to the inherent complexity of the agreements and the related valuation models. Auditing these elements required an increased level of audit effort, including the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Buffalo, New YorkHow the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the Audit

March 7, 2018Addressing the matter involved performing subjective procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. The primary procedures we performed include:  Inspecting the underlying agreements and ensuring appropriate application of the relevant accounting literature to the terms of the Debentures and Subordinated Note; evaluating the appropriateness of the fair value and classification of the Detachable Warrants; and utilizing personnel with specialized skill and knowledge in valuation to assist in assessing the fair value determined.

F-1

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESDebt extinguishment, conversion option and fair value measurement

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSCritical Audit Matter description

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company amended the Debentures (as defined in Note 13) with its lenders. The terms of the amendments are described in Note 13. For each amendment, the Company was required to evaluate troubled debt restructuring applicability and debt modification versus extinguishment analysis. Neither qualified as a troubled debt restructuring and the first was a modification while the second was extinguishment, primarily resulting from the addition of conversion feature.  Further, the conversion feature did require bifurcation from the debt host.  Therefore, both the conversion feature (Note 9) and the Debentures post-extinguishment were subject to fair market measurement. The derivative liability is subsequently adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.  

  2017  2016 
ASSETS      
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $3,659,534  $13,468,188 
Short-term investment securities  58,975,513   - 
Accounts receivable, net  957,066   40,992 
Inventory, net  3,282,537   3,092,686 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  746,805   195,569 
Total current assets  67,621,455   16,797,435 
         
Machinery and equipment, net  3,316,047   2,434,663 
         
Other assets:        
Intangible assets, net  7,435,411   7,389,946 
Investment  1,366,493   1,020,313 
Total other assets  8,801,904   8,410,259 
         
Total assets $79,739,406  $27,642,357 
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Current portion of note payable $-  $307,938 
Accounts payable  2,080,691   1,340,156 
Accrued expenses  1,987,675   1,401,566 
Accrued severance  -   199,657 
Deferred income  28,350   - 
Warrant liability  216,490   - 
Total current liabilities  4,313,206   3,249,317 
         
Warrant liability  -   58,681 
Total liabilities  4,313,206   3,307,998 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)  -   - 
         
Shareholders' equity        
          10,000,000 preferred shares, $.00001 par value        
          300,000,000 common shares, $.00001 par value        
   Capital stock issued and outstanding:        
          123,569,367 common shares (90,698,113 at December 31, 2016)  1,236   907 
Capital in excess of par value  166,592,536   102,471,907 
Accumulated deficit  (91,167,572)  (78,138,455)
Total shareholders' equity  75,426,200   24,334,359 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $79,739,406  $27,642,357 

We identified the accounting for the amended terms as well as the valuations related to the conversion option and Debentures post extinguishment as a critical audit matter.  Auditing the accounting for these items was especially challenging due to the inherent complexity of the agreements and the related valuation models. Auditing these elements required an increased level of audit effort, including the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

How the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the Audit

Addressing the matter involved performing subjective procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. The primary procedures we performed include:  Inspecting the underlying agreements and ensuring appropriate application of the relevant accounting literature to the terms of the amended Debentures; evaluating the appropriateness of the fair value for the bifurcated conversion option derivative and the amended Debentures post-extinguishment utilizing personnel with specialized skill and knowledge in valuation to assist in assessing the fair values determined.

F-2

Discontinued Operations

Critical Audit Matter description

As discussed in Notes 1, and 2 of the consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company divested substantially all of its assets in the GVB hemp/cannabis business and recorded impairment charges. As a result of the agreement management determined the hemp/cannabis disposal group has met the requirements to be presented as held for sale and discontinued operations for all periods presented.  The Company has not segregated the statement of cash flows.

We identified the reporting of discontinued operations and the impairment charges as a critical audit matter, which required extensive effort and a higher degree of auditor judgement.

How the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the audit

Addressing the matter involved performing subjective procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. The primary procedures we performed include: assessed management’s conclusion regarding discontinued operations treatment, obtained and read the related agreements and compared the terms of that agreement to the identification of the assets and liabilities included in the disposal group, reviewed management assumptions and judgment for determining historical numbers related to discontinued operations, reviewed and recomputed the loss on disposal of discontinued operations and related income tax benefit, and assessed the completeness and accuracy of the presentation and disclosures.

/s/ Freed Maxick, CPAs, P.C.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011.

Buffalo, New York

March 28, 2024

F-3

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data)

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

ASSETS

 

  

 

  

Current assets:

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents

$

2,058

$

2,205

Short-term investment securities

 

 

18,193

Accounts receivable, net

 

1,671

 

1,363

Inventories

 

4,346

 

7,270

Insurance recoveries

 

3,768

 

GVB promissory note

 

2,000

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

1,180

 

1,928

Current assets of discontinued operations held for sale

 

1,254

 

13,646

Total current assets

 

16,277

 

44,605

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

3,393

 

3,692

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

 

1,894

 

943

Intangible assets, net

 

5,924

 

7,212

Other assets

15

 

3,417

Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations held for sale

54,782

Total assets

$

27,503

$

114,651

 

  

 

  

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

  

 

  

Current liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Notes and loans payable - current

$

543

$

689

Current portion of long-term debt

5,848

Operating lease obligations

 

231

 

252

Accounts payable

 

4,445

 

2,051

Accrued expenses

 

1,322

 

766

Accrued litigation

 

3,768

 

Accrued payroll

 

883

 

2,662

Accrued excise taxes and fees

 

2,234

 

1,423

Deferred income

726

688

Other current liabilities

 

1,849

 

349

Current liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

 

3,185

 

4,138

Total current liabilities

 

25,034

 

13,018

Long-term liabilities:

 

  

 

  

Operating lease obligations

 

1,698

 

711

Long-term debt

8,058

Other long-term liabilities

1,123

344

Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

4,603

Total liabilities

35,914

18,676

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

 

 

Shareholders' equity (deficit)

 

  

 

  

Preferred stock, $.00001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized

 

  

 

  

Common stock, $.00001 par value, 66,666,667 shares authorized

 

  

 

  

Capital stock issued and outstanding:

 

  

 

  

43,525,862 common shares (14,349,275 at December 31, 2022)

 

 

Common stock, par value

Capital in excess of par value

 

370,297

 

333,900

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

(111)

Accumulated deficit

 

(378,707)

 

(237,814)

Total shareholders' equity (deficit)

 

(8,410)

 

95,975

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)

$

27,503

$

114,651

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(amounts in thousands, except per-share data)

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Revenues, net

$

32,204

$

40,501

Cost of goods sold

 

40,900

 

38,654

Gross (loss) profit

 

(8,696)

 

1,847

Operating expenses:

 

 

Sales, general and administrative

 

31,064

 

32,231

Research and development

 

2,644

 

3,578

Other operating expense (income), net

 

2,527

 

(327)

Total operating expenses

 

36,235

 

35,482

Operating loss from continuing operations

 

(44,931)

 

(33,635)

Other income (expense):

 

 

Realized loss on Panacea investment

(2,789)

Other income (expense), net

 

334

 

(366)

Loss on transfer of promissory note

 

(895)

 

Interest income, net

 

219

 

313

Interest expense

 

(9,366)

 

(55)

Total other expense

 

(9,708)

 

(2,897)

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(54,639)

(36,532)

Provision for income taxes

 

47

 

21

Net loss from continuing operations

$

(54,686)

$

(36,553)

Discontinued operations:

Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes

(85,634)

(23,703)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

455

(455)

Net loss from discontinued operations

$

(86,089)

$

(23,248)

Net loss

$

(140,775)

$

(59,801)

Deemed dividends

(9,992)

Net loss available to common shareholders

$

(150,767)

$

(59,801)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from continuing operations

$

(2.64)

$

(2.84)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations

$

(4.16)

$

(1.81)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from deemed dividends

$

(0.48)

$

Basic and diluted loss per common share

$

(7.28)

$

(4.65)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

20,711

12,856

Net loss

$

(140,775)

$

(59,801)

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term investment securities

 

71

 

(316)

Foreign currency translation

 

(1)

 

1

Reclassification of realized losses to net loss

 

41

 

366

Other comprehensive income

111

51

Comprehensive loss

$

(140,664)

$

(59,750)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

F-2

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(amounts in thousands, except share amounts)

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022

Common

Par Value

Capital in

Other

Shares

of Common

Excess of

Comprehensive

Accumulated

Shareholders'

    

Outstanding

    

Shares

    

Par Value

    

Income (Loss)

    

Deficit

    

Equity

Balance at January 1, 2022

 

10,858,237

$

$

244,249

$

(162)

$

(178,013)

$

66,074

Stock issued in connection with option exercises

 

10,001

 

 

174

 

 

 

174

Stock issued in connection with RSU vesting, net of shares withheld for taxes

 

149,482

 

 

(149)

 

 

 

(149)

Stock issued in connection with acquisition

 

2,193,334

 

 

51,653

 

 

 

51,653

Stock issued in connection with capital raise, net of issuance costs of 2,516

 

1,138,221

 

 

32,484

 

 

 

32,484

Equity-based compensation

 

 

 

5,489

 

 

 

5,489

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

51

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

(59,801)

 

(59,801)

Balance at December 31, 2022

 

14,349,275

$

$

333,900

$

(111)

$

(237,814)

$

95,975

Stock issued in connection with RSU vesting, net of shares withheld for taxes

 

114,786

 

 

(419)

 

 

(419)

Stock issued in connection with acquisition

31,056

 

 

503

 

 

503

Stock issued in connection with ATM, net of fees of $178

284,343

 

 

2,563

 

 

2,563

Stock issued in connection with licensing arrangement

333,334

 

3,570

 

 

3,570

Stock issued in connection with capital raises, net of issuance costs of 2,279

13,499,827

 

22,880

 

 

22,880

Stock issued in connection with warrant exercises, net of fees of $292

14,847,206

 

3,044

 

 

3,044

Equity detachable warrants

1,577

1,577

Adoption of ASU 2016-13

(118)

(118)

Fractional shares issued for reverse stock split

66,035

Equity-based compensation

 

 

2,679

 

 

2,679

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

111

 

 

111

Net loss

 

 

 

 

(140,775)

 

(140,775)

Balance at December 31, 2023

 

43,525,862

$

$

370,297

$

$

(378,707)

$

(8,410)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 
Revenue:            
    Sale of products, net $16,600,244  $12,279,979  $8,521,998 
             
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation shown separately below):            
   Products  17,308,156   12,709,678   9,102,560 
             
Gross loss  (707,912)  (429,699)  (580,562)
             
Operating expenses:            
Research and development (including equity based compensation of            
          $182,854, $136,946 and $167,837, respectively)  3,366,468   2,340,958   1,571,365 
General and administrative (including equity based compensation of            
          $625,202, $718,610 and $3,376,664, respectively)  7,116,535   6,193,269   7,760,127 
Sales and marketing (including equity based compensation of            
       $133,594, $55,826 and $41,039, respectively)  1,161,952   1,581,741   1,357,518 
Depreciation  353,435   326,124   319,699 
Amortization  593,562   516,056   454,612 
   12,591,952   10,958,148   11,463,321 
             
Operating loss  (13,299,864)  (11,387,847)  (12,043,883)
             
Other income (expense):            
    Warrant liability (loss) gain - net  (157,809)  29,615   144,550 
    Settlement Proceeds  -   -   1,000,000 
    Loss on the disposition of machinery and equipment  -   -   (15,130)
    Gain (loss) on investment  346,180   (202,338)  (95,684)
    Unrealized loss on short-term investment securities  (3,618)  -   - 
    Interest income  115,098   16,885   31,198 
    Interest expense  (29,104)  (37,745)  (52,982)
   270,747   (193,583)  1,011,952 
             
Loss before income taxes  (13,029,117)  (11,581,430)  (11,031,931)
             
Income taxes  -   -   - 
             
Net loss $(13,029,117) $(11,581,430) $(11,031,931)
             
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.13) $(0.15) $(0.16)
             
Common shares used in basic and diluted earnings per share calculation  101,161,380   79,842,773   68,143,284 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

F-3

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(amounts in thousands)

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Year Ended

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Net loss

$

(140,775)

$

(59,801)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:

 

  

 

  

Impairment of long-lived assets

3,297

1,488

Amortization and depreciation

 

3,951

 

2,858

Amortization of right-of-use asset

 

908

 

733

Amortization of inventory step-up

978

Unrealized loss on investment

 

 

5

GVB fire write-offs

 

 

4,549

Other non-cash (gains) and losses

(15)

563

Provision for credit losses

1,024

770

(Gain) loss on the sale of machinery and equipment

 

73

 

(368)

Realized loss (gain) on Panacea investment

 

2,789

Inventory write-off

 

237

Debt related charges included in interest expense

8,006

Equity-based employee compensation expense

 

2,679

 

5,489

Gain on change of contingent consideration

 

(1,138)

 

Change in fair value of warrant liabilities

(364)

Change in fair value of derivative liability

557

Loss on disposal of discontinued operations

58,521

Loss on transfer of promissory note

895

Deferred income taxes

434

(434)

Increase in inventory reserves

8,695

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition:

 

  

 

  

Accounts receivable

 

(18)

 

(2,881)

Inventory

 

(5,925)

 

(8,789)

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

451

 

(920)

Accounts payable

 

4,752

 

416

Accrued expenses

 

681

 

(582)

Accrued payroll

 

(2,153)

 

748

Accrued excise taxes and fees

 

811

 

153

Other liabilities

(334)

 

285

Net cash used in operating activities

 

(54,987)

 

(51,714)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

  

 

Acquisition of patents, trademarks, and licenses

 

(961)

 

(772)

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment

 

(4,656)

 

(3,657)

Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment

 

283

 

409

Acquisition, net of cash acquired

(254)

(1,297)

Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations

665

Investment in Change Agronomy Ltd.

(682)

Property, plant and equipment insurance proceeds

3,500

Sales and maturities of short-term investment securities

 

21,714

 

101,990

Purchase of short-term investment securities

 

(3,475)

 

(73,413)

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

16,816

 

22,578

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

  

 

Payments on notes payable

(5,581)

(3,822)

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

2,360

2,162

Other financing activities

(29)

Payments of long-term debt

(9,700)

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

16,849

Payment of debt issuance costs

(801)

Proceeds from issuance of detachable warrants

6,016

Net proceeds from option exercise

174

Net proceeds from warrant exercise

3,044

Proceeds from issuance of common stock related to the ATM

2,741

Payment of common stock issuance costs related to the ATM

(178)

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

25,158

35,000

Payment of common stock issuance costs

(2,279)

(2,516)

Taxes paid related to net share settlement of RSUs

(420)

(149)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

37,209

 

30,820

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(962)

 

1,684

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period

 

3,020

 

1,336

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

$

2,058

$

3,020

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

  

 

  

Net cash paid for:

 

  

 

  

Cash paid during the period for interest

$

1,313

$

34

Cash paid during the period for income taxes

$

40

$

14

Non-cash transactions:

 

  

 

  

Capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid

$

118

$

94

Right-of-use assets and corresponding operating lease obligations

$

5,166

$

Non-cash assignment of PLSH Promissory Note

$

2,600

$

Insurance/litigation gross up

$

3,768

$

Non-cash proceeds from sale of discontinued operations

$

2,000

$

Deemed dividends

$

9,801

$

Stock issued in connection with acquisition

$

$

51,653

Non-cash consideration RXP acquisition

$

1,641

$

Non-cash licensing arrangement

$

3,500

$

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

  Common  Par Value  Capital in       
  Shares  of Common  Excess of  Accumulated  Shareholders' 
  Outstanding  Shares  Par Value  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2014  64,085,042  641  70,744,190  (55,525,094) 15,219,737 
                     
Common stock issued in June 2015
registered direct offering, net
  6,000,000   60   5,576,023   -   5,576,083 
                     
Equity based compensation  553,896   6   1,623,417   -   1,623,423 
                     
Stock issued in connection with warrant exercise  40,000   -   50,688   -   50,688 
                     
Stock issued in connection with equity investment  377,906   4   324,996   -   325,000 
                     
Stock cancellation  (50,000)  (1)  (34,499)  -   (34,500)
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (11,031,931)  (11,031,931)
                     
Balance at December 31, 2015  71,006,844   710   78,284,815   (66,557,025) 11,728,500 
                     
Common stock issued in February 2016 registered direct offering, net  5,000,000   50   5,091,741   -   5,091,791 
                     
Common stock issued in July 2016 registered direct offering, net  6,172,840   62   4,682,702   -   4,682,764 
                     
Common stock issued in October 2016 registered direct offering, net  8,500,000   85   10,707,738   -   10,707,823 
                     
Reclassification of warrant liability to capital in excess of par  -   -   2,810,000   -   2,810,000 
                     
Equity based compensation  15,811   -   894,715   -   894,715 
                     
Stock issued in connection with warrant exercise  2,618   -   196   -   196 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (11,581,430)  (11,581,430)
                     
Balance at December 31, 2016  90,698,113  907  102,471,907  (78,138,455) 24,334,359 
                     
Equity based compensation  -   -   941,650   -   941,650 
                     
Stock issued in connection with warrant exercises  12,249,327   122   12,446,986   -   12,447,108 
                     
Stock issued in connection with stock option exercises  51,927   1   (1)  -   - 
                     
Common stock issued in October 2017 registered direct offering, net  20,570,000   206   50,731,994   -   50,732,200 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (13,029,117)  (13,029,117)
                     
Balance at December 31, 2017  123,569,367  $1,236  $166,592,536  $(91,167,572) $75,426,200 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.statements.

F-4

F-7

Table of Contents22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Years Ended December 31,

  2017  2016  2015 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net loss $(13,029,117) $(11,581,430) $(11,031,931)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:            
Amortization and depreciation  848,974   744,157   676,289 
Amortization of license fees  98,022   98,022   98,022 
(Gain) loss on investment  (346,180)  202,338   95,684 
Accretion of interest on note payable and accrued severance  29,104   37,745   45,121 
Loss on the disposition and sale of machinery and equipment  -   -   15,130 
Unrealized loss on short-term investment securities  3,618   -   - 
Warrant liability loss (gain)  157,809   (29,615)  (144,550)
Equity based employee compensation expense  941,650   880,509   1,326,393 
Equity based payments for outside services  -   30,873   2,259,147 
(Decrease) increase in allowance for doubtful accounts  (10,000)  -   10,000 
(Decrease) increase in inventory reserve  (60,623)  145,000   60,000 
(Increase) decrease in assets:            
Accounts receivable  (906,074)  10,238   (61,230)
Inventory  (129,228)  (531,356)  (701,534)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (551,236)  497,856   (478,955)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:            
Accounts payable  473,804   (136,297)  86,332 
Accrued expenses  586,109   (21,965)  649,271 
Accrued severance  (203,365)  (233,655)  (225,000)
Deferred income  28,350   -   - 
Net cash used in operating activities  (12,068,383)  (9,887,580)  (7,321,811)
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Acquisition of patents and trademarks  (450,208)  (356,541)  (413,180)
Acquisition of machinery and equipment  (1,156,906)  (197,229)  (37,481)
Purchase of short-term investment securities  (58,979,131)  -   - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (60,586,245)  (553,770)  (450,661)
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Net proceeds from exercise of warrants  12,447,108   196   50,688 
Payments on borrowings - demand bank loan  -   -   (174,925)
Payments on borrowings - note payable  (333,334)  (333,333)  (333,333)
Net proceeds from October 2017 registered direct offering  50,732,200   -   - 
Net proceeds from October 2016 registered direct offering  -   10,707,823   - 
Net proceeds from July 2016 registered direct offering  -   4,682,764   - 
Net proceeds from February 2016 registered direct offering  -   5,091,791   - 
Net proceeds from June 2015 registered direct offering  -   -   5,576,083 
Stock cancellation  -   -   (34,500)
Net payments from related party  -   -   46,069 
Net cash provided by financing activities  62,845,974   20,149,241   5,130,082 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (9,808,654)  9,707,891   (2,642,390)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period  13,468,188   3,760,297   6,402,687 
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period $3,659,534  $13,468,188  $3,760,297 
             
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:            
Net cash paid for:            
Cash paid during the period for interest $29,104  $37,745  $7,600 
Cash paid during the period for income taxes $-  $-  $- 
Non-cash transactions:            
Patent and trademark additions included in accounts payable $188,818  $185,341  $310,078 
Patent and trademark additions included in accrued expenses $-  $-  $17,715 
Machinery and equipment additions included in accounts payable $77,913  $7,765  $2,525 
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity investment $-  $-  $325,000 
Reclassification of warrant liability to capital in excess of par due to voiding            
   of exchange rights clause in Crede Tranche 1A warrant $-  $2,810,000  $- 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBERDecember 31, 20172023

Amounts in thousands, except for share and per share data

NOTE 1. - NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

22nd Century Group, Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “22nd Century Group” or the “Company”) is a publicly traded Nevada corporation on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “XXII.” 22nd Century Group is a tobacco products company with sales and distribution of the Company’s own proprietary new reduced nicotine tobacco products authorized as Modified Risk Tobacco Products by the FDA. Additionally, the Company provides contract manufacturing services for conventional combustible tobacco products for third-party brands.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation-The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and include the accounts of 22nd22nd Century Group Inc. (“22nd Century Group”),and its three wholly-owned subsidiaries, 22nd Century Limited, LLC (“22nd Century Ltd”), NASCO Products, LLC (“NASCO”), and Botanical Genetics, LLC (“Botanical Genetics”), and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of 22nd Century Ltd, Goodrich Tobacco Company, LLC (“Goodrich Tobacco”) and Heracles Pharmaceuticals, LLC (“Heracles Pharma”, formerly known as Hercules Pharmaceuticals, LLC) (collectively, the “Company”).wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accountsbalances and transactions have been eliminated.eliminated in consolidation.

As described in Note 2, on December 22, 2023, the Company divested substantially all of the assets of GVB Biopharma’s (“GVB”) business within its former hemp/cannabis segment.

NatureAs a result of Business- 22nd Century Ltd isthe divestiture of GVB and strategic shift away from hemp/cannabis, the Company has realigned its corporate and management reporting structure to focus solely on its tobacco business. As a plant biotechnology company specializingresult, during the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company reorganized its business to become a single reportable segment: (1) tobacco. This segment structure reflects the financial information and reports used by the Company’s management, specifically its Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), to make decisions regarding the Company’s business, including resource allocations and performance assessments. All assets and continuing operations of the Company are physically located or domiciled in technologythe United States.

The results of operations of the former hemp/cannabis segment are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for all periods presented and the related assets and liabilities associated with the discontinued operations are classified as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively. The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows includes cash flows related to the discontinued operations due to 22nd Century’s (parent) centralized treasury and cash management processes, and, accordingly, cash flow amounts for discontinued operations are disclosed in Note 2 “Discontinued Operations and Divestitures.” All results and information in the Consolidated Financial Statements are presented as continuing operations and exclude the former hemp/cannabis segment unless otherwise noted specifically as discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that allows (i)affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

F-8

The Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and expects to incur additional losses until such time that it can generate significant revenue and profit in its tobacco business. The Company had negative cash flow from operations of $54,987 and $51,714 for the levelyears ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and an accumulated deficit of nicotine$378,707 and other nicotinic alkaloids$237,814 as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $2,058. Subsequent to December 31, 2023, the Company completed a warrant inducement offering with gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $2,421, before deducting the placement agent fees of $165 (see Note 21 “Subsequent Events”).

Given the Company’s projected operating requirements and its existing cash and cash equivalents, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through one year following the date that the Consolidated Financial Statements are issued.

In response to these conditions, management is currently evaluating different strategies for reducing expenses, as well as pursuing financing strategies which include raising additional funds through the issuance of securities, asset sales, and through arrangements with strategic partners. If capital is not available to the Company when, and in tobacco plantsthe amounts needed, it could be required to liquidate inventory or assets, cease or curtail operations, or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or similar state proceedings. There can be decreasedno assurance that the Company will be able to raise the capital it needs to continue operations. Management’s plans do not alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern through one year following the date that the Consolidated Financial Statements are issued.

The Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or increased through genetic engineeringthe amounts and plant breedingclassification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Other Significant Risks and (ii)Uncertainties - The Company is subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the levelslack of cannabinoids in hemp plantsavailable capital; the possible delisting of its common stock from Nasdaq; future covenant non-compliance with respect to be decreasedthe Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility giving rise to an event of default; inability to identify or increased through genetic engineeringconsummate any strategic initiatives and plant breeding. Goodrich Tobaccotransactions; unsuccessful commercialization strategy and Heracles Pharma are business unitslaunch plans for the Company’s (i) potential modified risk tobacco products and premium cigarettes and (ii) smoking cessation product, respectively. The Company acquired the membership interestsor market acceptance of NASCO on August 29, 2014. NASCO is a federally licensed tobacco products manufacturer, a subsequent participating member under the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) between the tobacco industry and the settling states under the MSA and operates the Company’s cigarette manufacturing businessproducts; risks inherent in North Carolina. Botanical Genetics islitigation, including purported class actions; and protection of proprietary technology.

Reverse Stock Split – On July 5, 2023, the Company effectedwholly-owned subsidiary1-for-15 reverse stock split of 22nd Century Group and was incorporatedits common stock in order to facilitate an investment more fully described in Note 11.

Reclassifications - Certain itemsregain compliance with Nasdaq's continued listing requirements. Fractional shares resulting from the reverse stock split were rounded up to the nearest whole share, which resulted in the 2016issuance of a total of 66,035 shares of common stock to implement the reverse stock split. All share and 2015 financial statementsper share amounts, and exercise prices of stock options, and warrants in the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto have been reclassifiedretroactively adjusted for all periods presented to conformgive effect to the 2017 classification.this reverse stock split.

Preferred stock authorized-The Company is authorized to issue “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock.

Concentration of Credit Risk- Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash accounts in financial institutions. Although the cash accounts exceed the federally insured deposit amount, management does not anticipate nonperformance by the financial institutions. Management reviews the financial viability of these institutions on a periodic basis.

Cash and cash equivalents– The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents included in this category consist of a bank certificate of deposit. CashHowever, the Company has elected to classify money market mutual funds related to its short-term investment portfolio as short-term investment securities. There are no restrictions on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.equivalents.

F-9

Short-term investment securities– The Company’s short-term investment securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and consist of money market funds, corporate bonds, U.S. government agency bonds, U.S. treasury securities, and certificates of depositcommercial paper with maturities greater thanthat may extend beyond three months at the time of acquisition. The Company’s short-term investment securities are carried at fair value within current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, with fair value based on quoted market prices.Sheets. The Company views its available-for-sale securities as available for use in current operations regardless of the stated maturity date of the security. The Company’s Investmentinvestment policy states that all investment securities must have a maximum maturity of twenty-four (24) months or less and the maximum weighted maturity of the investment securities must not exceed twelve (12) months. AllSome of the Company’s short-term investment securities had a maturityare fixed-income debt instruments, and accordingly, unrealized gains and losses incurred on the short-term investment securities (the adjustment to fair value) are recorded in other comprehensive income or loss on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of less than twelve (12) months at December 31, 2017.Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on short-term investment securities are reflectedrecorded in the other income (expense) onportion of the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Net interest earnedOperations and Comprehensive Loss. Interest income is recorded on the short-termaccrual basis and presented net of investment securities are included in interest income.related fees.

Trade Accounts receivable- Receivable and Provision for Current Expected Credit Losses – The Company periodically reviews aged account balancesprovides credit, in the normal course of business, to its tobacco customers in the form of trade receivables. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and collateral is not required. The Company maintains a provision for collectability.those trade receivables that it does not expect to collect. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, the Company accrues its estimated losses from uncollectable accounts receivable to the provision based upon recent historical experience, the length of time the receivable has been outstanding, other specific information as it becomes available, and reasonable and supportable forecasts not already reflected in the historical loss information. Provisions for current expected credit losses are charged to current operating expenses. Actual losses are charged against the provision when incurred. As of December 31, 2017,2023, and 2016,2022, the Company has established an allowancerecorded a provision for doubtful accounts in the amountcredit losses of $0$8 and $10,000,$0, respectively.

F-6

Inventory-Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of historical cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using an average cost method for tobacco leaf inventory and raw materials inventory and standardinventory. Standard cost is primarily used for finished goods inventory. Inventories are evaluated to determine whether any amounts are not recoverable based on slow moving or obsolete condition and are written off or reserved as appropriate. Inventories at December 31, 2017

Property, plant and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following:

  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
       
Inventory – tobacco leaf $1,552,474  $1,936,039 
Inventory – finished goods        
Cigarettes and filtered cigars  289,004   340,523 
Inventory – raw materials        
Cigarette and filtered cigar components  1,636,059   1,071,747 
   3,477,537   3,348,309 
Less: inventory reserve  195,000   255,623 
         
  $3,282,537  $3,092,686 

equipment Machinery and equipment MachineryPlant and equipment are recorded at their acquisition cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years.lives. Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimate useful life of the asset, whichever is shorter. Depreciation commences when the asset is placed in service. The following table shows estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment:

Classification

Estimated Useful Lives

Leasehold improvements

shorter of 20 years or lease term

Manufacturing equipment

5 to 15 years

Office furniture, fixtures and equipment

3 to 10 years

Acquisitions - The Company accounts for acquisitions under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Results of operations of acquired companies are included in the Company’s results of operations as of the respective acquisition dates. The purchase price of each acquisition is allocated to the net assets acquired based on estimates of their fair values at the date of the acquisition. Any purchase price in excess of these net assets is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of purchase price in certain cases may be subject to revision based on the final determination of fair values during the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date.

F-10

Discontinued Operations - In determining whether a group of assets which has been disposed of (or is to be disposed of) should be presented as a discontinued operation, the Company analyzes whether the group of assets being disposed of represented a component of the entity; that is, whether it had historic operations and cash flows that were clearly distinguished (both operationally and for financial reporting purposes). In addition, the Company considers whether the disposal represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.

The assets and liabilities of a discontinued operation held for sale, other than goodwill, are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. The Company allocates interest to discontinued operations if the interest is directly attributable to the discontinued operations or is interest on debt that is required to be repaid as a result of the disposal transaction.

Contingent Consideration - Contingent consideration arising from a business acquisition is included as part of the purchase price and is recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the Company remeasures contingent consideration arrangements at fair value at each reporting period until the contingency is resolved. The changes in fair value are recognized within Other operating expenses (income), net in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Changes in fair values reflect new information about the likelihood of the payment of the contingent consideration and the passage of time. See Note 3 “Business Acquisitions” for the contingent consideration arising from the acquisition of RX Pharmatech Ltd.

Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable net assets of a business acquired and is assigned to one or more reporting units. The Company tests its reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment at least annually as of the measurement date year and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The Company concluded an interim impairment trigger event occurred and tested its goodwill for impairment during the quarter ended September 30, 2023 and concluded that goodwill impairment existed. No goodwill remained as of December 31, 2023. See Note 2 “Discontinued Operations and Divestitures” for additional information.

Intangible Assets - Intangible – Definite lived intangible assets are recorded at cost and consist primarily of (1) expenditures incurred with third partiesthird-parties related to the processing of patent claims and trademarks with government authorities, as well as costs to acquire patent rights from third parties,third-parties, (2) license fees paid for third-party intellectual property, (3) costs to become a signatory under the tobacco MSA, and (4) license fees paid to acquire a predicate cigarette brand.property. The amounts capitalized relate to intellectual property that the Company owns or to which it has exclusive rights.rights to use. The Company’s capitalized intellectual property capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining statutory life of the primary patent assets in each of the Company’s two primary patent families, which expire in 2018 and 2028 (the assets’have estimated lives), respectively.expiration dates ranging from 2026 to 2043. Periodic maintenance or renewal fees and any annualare expensed as incurred. Annual minimum license fees are charged to research and development expense as incurred.expense. License fees paid for third-party intellectual property are amortized on a straight-line basis over the last to expire patents, which patenthave expected expiration dates range from 2028 through 2035. 2043.

The Company believes that costs associated with becoming a signatory to the MSA and acquiringmaster settlement agreement “MSA”, costs related to the acquisition of a predicate cigarette brand, and tobacco brand related trademarks have an indefinite lifelives. At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether the nature and as such, no amortization is taken. Total intangible assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consistuse of the following: asset continue to support the indefinite-lived classification.

  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
Intangible assets, net        
Patent and trademark costs $6,327,467  $5,688,440 
Less:   accumulated amortization  2,517,465   2,021,926 
Patent and trademark costs, net  3,810,002   3,666,514 
         
License fees, net (see Note 17)  1,450,000   1,450,000 
Less:   accumulated amortization  326,591   228,568 
License fees, net  1,123,409   1,221,432 
         
MSA signatory costs  2,202,000   2,202,000 
         
License fee for predicate cigarette  brand  300,000   300,000 
         
  $7,435,411  $7,389,946 

F-7

Amortization expense relating to the above intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 amounted to $593,562, $516,056 and $454,612, respectively.

The estimated annual average amortization expense for the next five years is approximately $403,000 for patent costs and $98,000 for license fees. 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets -The Company reviews the carrying value of its amortizing long-lived assets wheneverat each reporting period to determine if impairment indicators are present in accordance with ASC 360-Property, plant, and equipment or ASC 350- Intangibles, Goodwill, and Other.

Definite lived intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for strategic importance and commercialization opportunity prior to expiration. If it is determined that the asset no longer supports the Company’s strategic objectives and/or will not be commercially viable prior to expiration, the asset is impaired. In addition, the Company will assess the expected future undiscounted cash flows for its intellectual property based on consideration of future market and economic conditions, competition, federal and state regulations, and licensing opportunities. If the carrying value of such assets are not recoverable, the carrying value will be reduced to fair value and the difference is recorded as impairment.

F-11

Indefinite-lived intangible asset carrying values are reviewed at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an impairment exists. The Company first performs a qualitative assessment and considers its current strategic objectives, future market and economic conditions, competition, and federal and state regulations to determine if an impairment is more likely than not. If it is determined that an impairment is more likely than not, a quantitative assessment is performed to compare the historical cost-carryingasset carrying value to fair value.

Leases – The Company determines if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at inception and classifies it as operating or finance. The Company has operating and finance leases for office and manufacturing facilities, machinery and vehicles. Finance lease assets and corresponding liabilities are not material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Any operating lease having a lease term greater than twelve months will be recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a right-of-use (ROU) asset with an associated lease obligation—all other leases are considered short-term in nature and will be expensed on a month-to-month basis. The ROU assets and lease obligations are recognized as of the commencement date at the net present value of the fixed minimum lease payments for the lease term. The lease term is determined based on the contractual conditions, including whether renewal options are reasonably certain to be exercised. The discount rate used is the interest rate implicit in the lease, if available, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate which is determined using a base line rate plus an asset may no longer be recoverable.applicable spread.

Refer to Note 6 “Right-of-use Assets, Lease Obligations, and Other Leases” for additional information.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments FASB ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

A financial asset’s or a financial liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company assesses recoverabilityestimates that the carrying amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, contract assets, promissory note receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and notes and loans payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements” contains additional information on assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Warrants - The Company accounts for stock warrants as either equity instruments, derivative liabilities, or liabilities in accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (ASC 480) and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815) depending on the specific terms of the asset by estimatingwarrant agreement. The assessment considers whether the future undiscountedwarrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own ordinary shares and whether the warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end date while the warrants are outstanding. 

Warrants that the Company may be required to redeem through payment of cash or other assets outside its control are classified as liabilities pursuant to ASC 480 and are initially and subsequently measured at their estimated fair values. Changes in subsequent measurement fair value are recorded in Other income (expense), net cash flows expectedof the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. For issued or modified warrants that meet all of the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of additional paid-in

F-12

capital at the time of issuance. For additional discussion on warrants, see Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 10 “Capital Raise and Warrants for Common Stock”.

Deemed dividends associated with anti-dilution or down round provisions (commonly referred to as “ratchets”) represent the economic transfer of value to holders of equity-classified freestanding financial instruments when these provisions are triggered. These deemed dividends are presented as a reduction in net income or an increase in net loss available to common stockholders and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital resulting in no change to stockholders’ equity/deficit. The incremental value of modifications to warrants as a result of the trigger of down round provisions in connection with equity financings was $3,029, the incremental value of replacement warrants was $6,596, and the incremental value of modifications to warrants as a result of the trigger of anti-dilution provisions of the JGB warrants was $367. Such amounts were determined using Monte-Carlo valuation models and are recorded as Deemed dividends for the year ended December 31, 2023 on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Debt Issued with Detachable Warrants - The Company considers guidance within ASC 470-20, Debt (ASC 470), ASC 480, and ASC 815 when accounting for the issuance of debt with detachable warrants. As described above under the caption “Warrants”, the Company classifies stock warrants as either equity instruments, derivative liabilities, or liabilities depending on the specific terms of the warrant agreement. In circumstances in which debt is issued with detachable warrants, the proceeds from the asset, including eventual disposition. Ifissuance of the debt are first allocated to the warrants at their full estimated future undiscounted net cash flowsfair value with a corresponding debt discount. The remaining proceeds, as further reduced by discounts (including those created by the bifurcation of embedded derivatives), is allocated to the debt. The Company accounts for debt as liabilities measured at amortized cost and amortizes the resulting debt discount from the allocation of proceeds, to interest expense using the effective interest method over the expected term of the debt instrument pursuant to ASC 835, Interest (ASC 835).

Embedded Derivatives - The Company considers whether there are less thanany embedded features in debt instruments that require bifurcation and separate accounting as derivative financial instruments pursuant to ASC 815. Embedded derivatives are initially and subsequently measured at fair value. With the exception of the bifurcated embedded conversion option as described in Note 13 “Debt”, the embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility and Subordinated Note are not material.

Debt Issuance Costs and Discounts - Debt issuance costs and discounts associated with the issuance of debt by the Company are deferred and amortized over the term of the related debt. Debt issuance costs and discounts related to the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facility and Subordinated Note are recorded as a reduction of the carrying value of the asset,related debt and are amortized to Interest expense using the effective interest method over the period from the date of issuance to the maturity date, whichever is earlier. The amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts are included in Debt related charges included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Note 13 “Debt” contains additional information on the Company’s debt issuance costs and discounts.

Transfers of Financial Assets – The Company accounts for transfers of financial assets as sales when it has surrendered control over the related assets. Whether control has been relinquished requires, among other things, an impairmentevaluation of relevant legal considerations and an assessment of the nature and extent of the Company’s continuing involvement with the assets transferred. Gains and losses resulting from transfers reported as sales are included as a component of Other income (expense) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Gain/Loss on Debt Extinguishment – Gain or loss on debt extinguishment is generally recorded equal toupon an extinguishment of a debt instrument. Gain or loss on extinguishment of debt is calculated as the difference between the asset’sreacquisition price and net carrying amount of the debt, which includes unamortized debt issuance costs. Gains and losses on debt extinguishment are included as a component of Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

F-13

Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control of the product to a customer. For additional discussion on revenue recognition, refer to Note 17 “Revenue Recognition”.

Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock Based Compensation – The Company’s Omnibus Incentive Plan allows for various types of equity-based incentive awards. Stock based compensation expense is based on awards that are expected to vest over the requisite service periods and are based on the fair value of the award measured on the grant date. Vesting requirements vary for directors, officers, and its fair value. There was no impairment loss recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 or 2015.employees. In general, time-based awards fully vest after one year for directors and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period for officers and employees. Performance-based awards vest upon achievement of certain milestones. Forfeitures are accounted for when they occur.

Income Taxes -The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for any basis differences in its assets and liabilities between tax and U.S. GAAP reporting, and for operating loss and credit carry-forwards.

ConsideringAs a result of the Company’s history of cumulative net operating losses and the uncertainty of their future utilization, the Company has established a valuation allowance to fully offset its net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20172023, and 2016.

December 31, 2022.

The Company’s federal and state tax returns for the years ended December 31, 20142020 through December 31, 20162022 are currently open to audit under the statutes of limitations. There are no pending audits as of December 31, 2017.2023.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system, including a Federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%. In accordance with a question and answer document issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) staff on January 18, 2018, the Company is applying the guidance in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which provides guidance on applying FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, if the accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA are incomplete by the time the financial statements are issued for a reporting period. Specifically, SAB 118 permits companies to use reasonable estimates and provisional amounts for some line items for taxes when preparing year-end 2017 financial statements. The Company has completed the accounting under the TCJA, and accordingly, has reported the effects in these financial statements. Additional disclosures required by SAB 118 are included in Note 20 – Income Taxes.

Stock Based Compensation- The Company uses a fair-value based method to determine compensation for all arrangements under which Company employees and others receive shares or options to purchase common shares of the Company. Stock based compensation expense is recorded over the requisite service period based on estimates of probability and time of achieving milestones and vesting. For accounting purposes, the shares will be considered issued and outstanding upon vesting.

Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue from product sales at the point the product is shipped to a customer and title has transferred.  Revenue from the sale of products is recognized net of cash discounts, sales returns and allowances. Cigarette and filtered cigar federal excise taxes and other regulatory fees in the approximate amount of $8,533,000, $7,452,000 and $5,703,000 are included in net sales for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, except on sales ofSPECTRUM® research cigarettes, exported cigarettes, exported filtered cigars and in-bond sales of filtered cigars to other federally licensed tobacco product manufactures, to which such taxes do not apply.

Derivatives-The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all our financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair market value and then is revalued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The methodology for valuing our outstanding warrants classified as derivative instruments utilizes a lattice model approach which includes probability weighted estimates of future events, including volatility of our common stock. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified on the balance sheet as current or non-current based on if the net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within twelve months of the balance sheet date.

F-8

Research and Development-Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Advertising- The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $75,000, $325,000 and $229,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Loss Per Common Share-Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities. Potential common shares outstanding are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. Refer to Note 16 “Loss Per Common Share” for additional information.

CommitmentGain and Contingency Accounting-Loss Contingencies The Company establishes an accrued liability for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Company does not establish an accrued liability. As a litigation or regulatory matter develops, the Company, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates each commitment and/on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. If, at the time of evaluation, the loss contingency related to a litigation or regulatory matter is not both probable and estimable, the matter will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and estimable. When a loss contingency related to a litigation or regulatory matter is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Company will establish an accrued liability with respect to such loss contingency and record a corresponding amount of related expenses. The Company will then continue to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of any such accrued liability.

The Company maintains general liability insurance policies for its facilities. Under the terms of our insurance policies, in the case of loss to a property, the Company follows the guidance in ASC 610-30, Other Income —Gains and Losses on Involuntary Conversions, for the conversion of nonmonetary assets (the properties) to monetary assets (insurance recoveries). Under ASC 610-30, once the recovery is deemed probable the Company recognizes an asset for the insurance recovery receivable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with corresponding income that is offsetting to the casualty losses recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. If the insurance recovery is less than the amount of the casualty charges recognized, the Company will recognize a loss whereas if the insurance recovery is greater than the amount of casualty loss recognized, the Company will only recognize a recovery up to the amount of the casualty loss and will account for the excess as a gain contingency in accordance with ASC 450-30, Gain Contingencies. Business interruption insurance is treated as a gain contingency. Gain contingencies are recognized when earned and realized, which typically will occur at the accounting standards, which state that if the itemtime of final settlement or when cash is more likely than notreceived.

Refer to become a direct liability, thenNote 12 “Commitments and Contingencies”.

F-14

Severance charges - From time to time, the Company will recordevaluates its resources and optimizes its business plan to align to changing needs of executing on its strategy. These actions may result in voluntary or involuntary employee termination benefits. Voluntary termination benefits are accrued when an employee accepts the liabilityrelated offer. Involuntary termination benefits are accrued upon the commitment to a termination plan and the benefit arrangement is communicated to affected employees, or when liabilities are determined to be probable and estimable, depending on the existence of a substantive plan for severance or termination. The following table summarizes the change in accrued liabilities, presented within Other current liabilities and Other long-term liabilities Consolidated Balance Sheets:

Balance at January 1, 2022

$

238

Accruals

692

Cash payments

(296)

Balance at December 31, 2022

634

Accruals

790

Reversal from settlement

(168)

Cash payments

(870)

Balance at December 31, 2023

$

386

December 31, 

    

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Current

$

386

$

349

Noncurrent

285

Total severance liability

$

386

$

634

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Sales, general, and administrative

$

401

$

692

Other operating expense, net

 

221

 

Total severance charges

$

622

$

692

Recent Accounting Pronouncement(s) –

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13, or ASC 326 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, effective January 1, 2023 under a modified retrospective approach. Under the financial statements. If not,current expected credit losses (“CECL”) model, the Company will disclose any material commitments or contingencies that may arise.

Useimmediately recognizes an estimate of Estimates-The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted incredit losses expected to occur over the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the datelife of the financial statementsasset at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. Estimated credit losses are determined by taking into consideration historical loss conditions, current conditions and the reported amounts of incomereasonable and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments- The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investment securities, receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued severance, note payable and warrant liability. Other than for cash equivalents, short-term investment securities and warrant liability, fair value is assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments, since they are short term in nature, they are receivable or payable on demand, or had stated interest rates that approximate the interest rates availablesupportable forecasts. Changes to the Company as of the reporting date.expected lifetime credit losses are recognized each period. The determination of the fair value of cash equivalents, short-term investment securities and warrant liability are discussed in Note 14.

Equity Investments -The Company accounts for investments in equity securities of other entities under the equity method of accounting ifnew guidance applies to the Company’s investment intrade receivables and contract asset balances. Due to the voting stock is greater than or equal to 20%nature of business operations and less than a majority, andcontracts with customers, the Company has historically not experienced significant bad debt expense or write-offs and as a result, the ability to have significant influence over the operating and financial policiesadoption of the investee. If the Company’s equity investment of other entities is less than 20%, and the Company has no significant influence over the operating or financial policies of the entity, and such equity investment doesASC 326 did not have a readily determinable market value,material impact to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. In connection with the adoption of ASC 326, the Company usesrecorded a provision for credit losses of $118 with an offsetting cumulative-effect adjustment to the cost methodopening balance of accountingretained earnings as of January 1, 2023.

F-15

Accounting Guidance Not Yet Elected or Adopted

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280)-Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The ASU enhances disclosure of significant segment expenses by requiring disclosure of significant segment expenses regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker, extend certain annual disclosures to interim periods, and permits more than one measure of segment profit or loss to be reported under certain conditions. The amendments are effective for the investment.Company in years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption of the ASU is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not been issued. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Pronouncements -In May 2014,December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740)-Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The core principleASU requires additional quantitative and qualitative income tax disclosures to allow readers of ASU 2014-09 isthe consolidated financial statements to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflectsassess how the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitledCompany’s operations, related tax risks and tax planning affect its tax rate and prospects for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing GAAP. The revised effective date forfuture cash flows. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Deferral of the Effective Date,” which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with earlier application permitted as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Principal versus Agent Considerations,” to clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies the identifying performance obligations and licensing implementation guidance. The Company has completed its review and assessment of all outstanding contracts and has applied the five-step model to the contracts to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative impacts the new standards will have on the Company’s business. Based on the review and assessment, the Company will recognize revenue over time on certain contracts but believes the new guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s reported revenues, results of operations, cash flows or financial position. 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This guidance changes how entities account for equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Entities will be required to measure these investments at fair value at the end of each reporting period and recognize changes in fair value in net income. A practicability exception will be available for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values, however; the exception requires the Company to adjust the carrying amount for impairment and observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. This guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and other aspects of current US GAAP. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and is applicable to the Company in fiscal 2018. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-01 on its consolidated financial statements, specifically relating to its investment in Anandia (see Note 11).  The Company expects to recognize income in the first quarter of 2018 of approximately $6,000,000 as a result of adjusting the investment to fair value based on an orderly transaction in January 2018.

F-9

  In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which supersedes existing lease guidance under GAAP. Under the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognize leases as right of use assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than twelve months. The guidance will apply for both finance and operating leases. The effective date for the ASU is for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein. 2024.The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of thethis ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

We consider the applicability and impact of all ASUs. If the ASU is not listed above, it was determined that the ASU was either not applicable or would have an immaterial impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.

NOTE 2. – OCTOBER 2017 REGISTERED DIRECT OFFERINGDISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Provision for Impairment of GVB Hemp/Cannabis Business

During the third quarter of 2023, the Company identified certain events and circumstances that could potentially be an impairment triggering event for both the tobacco and hemp/cannabis reporting units in connection with (1) the announcement of initiating a process to evaluate strategic alternatives for the Company’s assets, and (2) announcement of cost cut initiatives intended to yield significant cash savings on an annual basis. The initiation of these two processes was in response to the sustained decline in the Company's market capitalization, operating losses and negative cash flows from operations, and current liquidity position, and is intended to monetize the value or more effectively expand the market reach of our products.

Accordingly, the Company evaluated the impact on each of its reporting units to assess whether there was an impairment triggering event requiring it to perform a goodwill impairment test. The Company had no recorded goodwill in its tobacco reporting unit. For the hemp/cannabis reporting unit, as part of this impairment test, the Company considered certain qualitative factors, such as the Company’s performance, business forecasts, and strategic plans. It reviewed key assumptions, including projected cash flows and future revenues. After reviewing the qualitative assessment, the Company determined a quantitative assessment was required to be performed.

Using the income approach, with the discount rate selected considering and capturing the related risk associated with the forecast, the Company compared the fair value of the reporting unit to carrying value. Based on the results, the carrying value of the hemp/cannabis reporting unit exceeded its fair value and the goodwill was determined to be impaired and $33,360, representing the full amount of goodwill recorded to the hemp/cannabis reporting unit, was written off as impaired during the quarter ended September 30, 2023.

The impairment charge is the result of the Company's Step-1 goodwill impairment test for the former hemp/cannabis reporting unit, which reflected a decrease in the future expected cash flows related to bulk ingredient and CDMO+D product sales, along with increases in discount rates to reflect the uncertainty of future cash flows. Estimating the fair value of goodwill requires the use of estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number of factors, including unobservable level 3 inputs. These estimates and judgments may not be within the control of the Company and accordingly it is reasonably possible that the judgments and estimates could change in future periods.

F-16

The Company also evaluated the recoverability of its hemp/cannabis segment other intangible assets, net and long-lived assets to determine whether any assets or asset groups were impaired. The Company determined that the carrying value of certain tradenames, patents and license intangible assets, net were greater than their fair value, as these intangible assets related to hemp/cannabis operations. Therefore, the Company recorded additional provision for impairment in the amount of $10,879, the Cookies license acquired in the second quarter of 2023 was written-off and fully impaired in the amount of $3,037, and a loss on equity investments of $682. Additionally, through a similar analysis, the Company recorded provision for impairment of $7,418 for property, plant and equipment and $5,038 for operating lease right-of-use assets related to manufacturing and lab facilities. The undiscounted cash flow analysis and fair value determination requires the use of estimates and significant judgments that are based on a number of factors, including unobservable level 3 inputs. For the year ended December 31, 2023, total impairment charges for other intangibles and long-lived assets is $25,189.

Discontinued Operations and Divestiture of GVB Hemp/Cannabis Business

On November 20, 2023, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Specialty Acquisition Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Buyer”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell substantially all of its equity interests in its GVB hemp/cannabis business (the “Purchased Interests”) for a purchase price of $2,250 (the “Purchase Price”).

 

On October 10, 2017,December 22, 2023, the Company closedand the Buyer entered into an Amendment to Equity Purchase Agreement (the “GVB Amendment”) pursuant to which the Company and the Buyer increased the Purchase Price to $3,100 (the “New Purchase Price”) which consisted of (i) a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) with institutional investors purchasingcash payment of $1,100 to the Company’s senior lender, on behalf of and at the direction of the Company and (ii) a 12% secured promissory note issued by the Buyer to the Company’s senior lender, on behalf of and at the direction of the Company, in an aggregate principal amount of 20,570,000$2,000 (the “GVB Note”). Until repaid to the senior lender, the GVB Note is recorded as a current asset and corresponding amount is pledged as Current portion of long term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2023.

The parties previously agreed that the Company would retain any insurance proceeds received in connection with the fire at the Grass Valley manufacturing facility, if any (the “Insurance Proceeds”) and up to the first $2,000 of the Insurance Proceeds would be used to offset the Buyer’s portion of certain shared liabilities. Pursuant to the terms of the GVB Amendment, the Buyer will be entitled to offset its portion of certain shared contingent liabilities up to $1,000; provided that, the Insurance Proceeds exceed $5,000.

In connection with the closing of the transaction on December 22, 2023, but prior to any adjustments for Insurance Proceeds and certain shared liabilities, after selling expenses of $434, the Company recognized a loss on disposal of discontinued operations of $58,521 during the year ended December 31, 2023, which includes the third quarter impairment charges described above.

For disposal transactions, a component of an entity that is anticipated to be sold in the future is reported in discontinued operations after it meets the criteria for held-for-sale classification, and if the disposition represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity's operations and financial results. The Company evaluated the quantitative and qualitative factors related to the expected sale of the GVB hemp/cannabis business and exit from the hemp/cannabis space, and concluded that it met the held-for-sale criteria and that all other conditions for discontinued operations presentation were not met until November 30, 2023. Property, plant and equipment are not depreciated, and intangibles assets are not amortized once classified as held-for-sale.

As a result, the operating results of the hemp/cannabis disposal group have been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for all periods presented and the assets and liabilities of the hemp/cannabis disposal group have been classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. See additional information in Note 3, “Business Acquisitions” related to GVB And RXP, including the date of transactions and periods that operating results of the acquired business are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-17

The assets and liabilities of a discontinued operation held for sale, other than goodwill, are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Following the provision for impairment charges recorded during the third quarter of 2023 as described above, the Company concluded the carrying value of assets and liabilities of the GVB hemp/cannabis business approximated fair value when deemed held for sale based on the purchase price consideration of $3,100.

As of December 31, 2023, all assets and liabilities of the hemp/cannabis disposal group are presented as current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as management believes the remaining disposal and exit from hemp/cannabis is deemed probable and will occur within one year. The carrying amounts of the hemp/cannabis disposal group assets and liabilities that were classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale were as follows:

December 31, 

December 31, 

2023

2022

Cash and cash equivalents

$

$

815

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

4,278

Inventories

 

 

2,738

Insurance recoveries

 

 

5,000

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

9

 

815

Property, plant and equipment, net - current

 

1,207

Other current assets

38

Current assets of discontinued operations held for sale

$

1,254

$

13,646

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

9,401

Operating lease right-of-use assets, net

 

 

1,732

Goodwill

 

 

33,160

Intangible assets, net

 

 

9,641

Investments

 

 

682

Other assets

166

Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations held for sale

$

$

54,782

Notes and loans payable - current

$

2

$

219

Operating lease obligations

 

1,083

 

429

Accounts payable

 

2,013

 

2,117

Accrued expenses

 

79

 

662

Accrued payroll

 

 

537

Deferred income

8

143

Other current liabilities

 

 

31

Current liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

$

3,185

$

4,138

Notes and loans payable

 

 

3,001

Operating lease obligations

 

 

1,430

Other long-term liabilities

172

Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

$

$

4,603

Net (liabilities) assets

$

(1,931)

$

59,687

F-18

Net loss from discontinued operations for year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Revenues, net

$

42,113

$

21,610

Cost of goods sold

49,185

22,283

Gross loss

(7,072)

(673)

Operating expenses:

Sales, general and administrative

16,540

12,286

Research and development

3,010

2,983

Other operating expense, net (1)

118

7,529

Loss on disposal of discontinued operations

58,521

Total operating expenses

78,189

22,798

Operating loss from discontinued operations

(85,261)

(23,471)

Other income (expense):

Other income, net

65

66

Interest expense (2)

(438)

(298)

Total other expense

(373)

(232)

Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes

(85,634)

(23,703)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

455

(455)

Net loss from discontinued operations

$

(86,089)

$

(23,248)

(1) The Company recorded $25,189 of impairment charges in Other operating expenses, net and recorded $33,360 of Goodwill impairment from discontinued operations during the three months ended September 30, 2023, which were reclassified to Loss on disposal of discontinued operations during the three months ended December 31, 2023.

(2) The Company allocates interest to discontinued operations if the interest is directly attributable to the discontinued operations or is interest on debt that is required to be repaid as a result of the disposal transaction. Interest expense included in discontinued operations reflects an estimate of interest expense related to the $3,100 principal balance of debt that is required to be repaid with the proceeds from the sale of the GVB hemp/cannabis business.

F-19

The components of discontinued operations “Other operating expenses, net” were as follows:

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Grass Valley fire:

Fixed asset write-offs

$

$

5,550

Inventory charges

3,998

Lease obligations

20

Professional services

407

36

Compensation & benefits

195

Insurance recoveries

(5,000)

Total Grass Valley fire

407

4,799

Severance

13

Impairment of intangible assets

1,453

Gain on change in contingent consideration

(1,138)

Needlerock Farms settlement

769

Impairment of inventory

237

Gain on sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment

(64)

(6)

Acquisition costs

131

1,046

Total other operating expenses, net

$

118

$

7,529

Grass Valley fire

In November 2022, there was a fire at our Grass Valley manufacturing facility in Oregon, which manufactures bulk ingredients, primarily CBD isolate and distillate. The Company has incurred continuous expenses throughout 2023 related to consulting, legal and demolition at this facility.

Cash flow information from discontinued operations for years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was as follows:

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Cash used in operating activities

$

21,281

$

17,274

Cash used in investing activities

$

799

$

3,665

Depreciation and amortization

$

2,443

$

1,566

Capital expenditures

$

3,752

$

2,752

NOTE 3. – BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

The following acquisitions occurring during the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, are included in the Company’s former hemp/cannabis reportable segment. Accordingly, the results of operations are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for all periods presented. See Note 2 “Discontinued Operations and Divestitures” for additional information.

F-20

RX Pharmatech, Ltd.

On January 19, 2023, the Company acquired RX Pharmatech Ltd (“RXP”) pursuant to a share purchase agreement ("SPA”) a privately held distributor of cannabinoids with 1,276 novel food applications with the U.K. Food Standards Agency (“FSA”). RXP’s products include CBD isolate and numerous variations of finished products like gummies, oils, drops, candies, tinctures, sprays, capsules and others.

The initial consideration paid to acquire RXP included $200 in cash and $503 in common stock (consisting of 31,056 unregistered shares of common stock), and an initial estimate of target working capital true-up of $286. The fair value of the Company’s common stock at aissued as part of the consideration was determined based upon the opening stock price of $2.6250 perthe Company’s shares as of the acquisition date. Additionally, the contingent consideration in the transaction represents the estimated fair value of the Company’s obligation, under the share generatingpurchase agreement, to make additional equity based payments of up to $1,550 over the next three years based on specified conditions being met, which has an initial fair value of contingent consideration of $1,138. The fair value of the aggregate consideration in the transaction is $2,127.

Based on the preliminary purchase price allocation, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed principally comprise $1,744 of intangible assets, and other immaterial working capital items representing a net asset of $93 (net of cash proceeds foracquired of $290). There was no excess purchase price and therefore no goodwill recorded as part of the Companybusiness combination. The determination of $50,732,200, after deducting expensesestimated fair value required management to make significant estimates and assumptions based on information that was available at the time the Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared.

Intangible assets include the intellectual property associated with the transaction. The securities purchase agreement entered into1,276 novel food applications with the institutional investors provides that, subjectFSA, which is determined to certain exceptions, for a period of one year followingbe indefinite lived. The preliminary fair value was determined by utilizing the closingcost approach and considered market data to evaluate the replacement cost per application. The intellectual property is included in the former hemp/cannabis reportable segment.

The Company utilizes third-party valuation experts to assist in estimating the fair value of the Offering,contingent consideration and develops estimates by considering weighted-average probabilities of likely outcomes and discounted cash flow analysis. These estimates require the Company will be prohibited from effectingto make various assumptions about forecasted revenues and discount rates, which are unobservable and considered Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. A change in these inputs to a different amount might result in a significantly higher or entering into an agreement to effect any issuance bylower fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following table provides quantitative information associated with the initial fair value measurement of the Company’s liabilities for contingent consideration as of January 19, 2023:

Maximum Payout

Weighted Average

Contingency Type

(undiscounted)

Fair Value

Unobservable Inputs

or Range

Revenue-based payments

$

1,550

$

1,138

Discount rate

16

%

Projected year(s) of payment

2024-2026

During the third quarter of 2023, the Company or anyfinalized amounts recorded as purchase price allocation and recorded measurement period adjustments of its subsidiaries$53, resulting from an increase of common stock or common stock equivalents (or a combination of units thereof) involving a variable rate transaction, which generally includes any transaction in which the Company (i) issues or sells any debt or equity securities that are convertible into, exchangeable or exercisable for, or includeworking capital true-up amount based on final payment made to the right to receive additional shares of common stock either (A) at a conversion price or exchange rate that is based upon and/or variessellers.

On December 22, 2023, concurrent with the trading prices of or quotations for the shares of common stock at any time after the initial issuance of such securities, or (B) with a conversion, exercise or exchange price that is subject to being reset at some future date after the initial issuance of such debt or equity security or upon the occurrence of specified or contingent events directly or indirectly related to the business of the Company or the market for the common stock or (ii) enters into any agreement, whereby the Company may issue securities at a future determined price.

NOTE 3. – JUNE 2017 WARRANT EXERCISE AGREEMENTS

On June 19, 2017,GVB divestiture (as described in Note 2) which included RXP, the Company entered into Warrant Exercise Agreementsa binding letter agreement to terminate its’ remaining contingent consideration obligation payable in shares under the SPA with the sellers of RXP. Accordingly, for the year-ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized within discontinued operations a gain of $1,138 in Other operating expenses, net in connection with the change in fair value of the contingent consideration.

F-21

GVB Biopharma

On May 13, 2022, the Company entered into and closed the transactions contemplated by the Reorganization and Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreements”“Reorganization Agreement”) with GVB. Under the terms of the Reorganization Agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the holdersassets of GVB’s business dedicated to hemp-based cannabinoid extraction, refinement, contract manufacturing and product development (the “Holders”“Transaction”).

The aggregate consideration for the Transaction consisted of outstanding warrants(i) the assumption of approximately $4,637 of debt, (ii) the assumption and direct payment of certain third-party transaction costs incurred by GVB in connection with the Transaction totaling approximately $1,753 and (iii) the issuance to purchase up to 7,043,211GVB of 2,193,334 unregistered shares of common stock of the Company at $1.00 per share and warrants to purchase up to 4,250,000 shares(the “Shares”) with a fair value of common stock of the Company at $1.45 per share (collectively, the “Warrants”). These Warrants to purchase shares$51,653. The fair value of the Company’s common stock wereissued as part of the consideration was determined based upon the opening stock price of the Company’s shares as of the acquisition date.

The Transaction was structured as a tax-free re-organization pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 368(a)(1)(c). Accordingly, the tax basis of net assets acquired by the Holdersretain their carry over tax basis and holding period in registered direct offerings in October of 2016 and in July of 2016, respectively, as more fully described in Notes 4 and 5 below. purchase accounting.

The Company and the Holders agreed that the Holders would, subject to beneficial ownership limitations on exercise contained in the Warrants, exercise all the Warrants for cash. In June 2017, the Holders exercised 3,229,711 Warrants at $1.00 per share and 2,354,948 Warrants at $1.45 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $6,169,212, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction. In July and August of 2017, the Holders exercised 3,813,500 Warrants at $1.00 per share and 1,895,052 Warrants at $1.45 per share, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $6,167,646, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction.

In considerationrecorded provisional estimated fair values for the Holders exercising their Warrants for cash, the Company issued to each Holder a new warrant (the “New Warrants”) toassets purchased, liabilities assumed and purchase sharesconsideration as of common stock of the Company equal to the number of shares of common stock received by each Holder upon the cash exercise of the Holder’s Warrants. The terms of the New Warrants are substantially similar to the terms of the Warrants exercised, except the New Warrants (i) have an exercise price equal to $2.15 per share and (ii) are exercisable six months from the date of issuancethe acquisition during the second quarter of 2022, resulting in goodwill of $44,200. The determination of estimated fair value required management to make significant estimates and assumptions based on information that was available at the time the Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared.

Following the initial acquisition accounting, the Company recorded final measurement period adjustments, in which the preliminary fair values of the New Warrantsassets acquired and liabilities assumed as of May 13, 2022 were adjusted to reflect the ongoing acquisition valuation analysis procedures of property and equipment, intangible assets, deferred taxes, and working capital adjustments. These adjustments resulted in a combined reduction to goodwill of $10,840. The impact of depreciation and amortization to Operating loss recorded in the third quarter of 2022 as a result of completing valuation procedures for property and equipment and intangible assets, that would have been recorded in the prior period since the date of acquisition was $70.

The following table presents management’s purchase price allocation:

Cash

$

456

Accounts receivable

2,944

Inventory

3,551

Other assets

519

Property, plant & equipment

11,189

Operating leases right-of-use assets, net

1,231

Goodwill

33,360

Tradename

4,600

Customer relationships

5,800

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

(2,777)

Other current liabilities

(944)

Lease liabilities

(1,259)

Auto loans

(387)

Deferred tax liability

(627)

Bridge loan

(4,250)

Fair value of net assets acquired

$

53,406

The fair values of the assets acquired were determined using one of three valuation approaches: market, income or cost. The selection of a particular method for a periodgiven asset depended on the reliability of five (5) years. Accordingly,available data and the Company issued an aggregate of 11,293,211 New Warrants to the Holders, upon exercisenature of the Holder’s Warrants as described above. asset, among other considerations.

F-22

The New Warrants hadmarket approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on available market pricing for comparable assets. The income approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset. The projected cash flows were discounted at a required rate of return that reflects the relative risk of the asset and the time value of money. The projected cash flows for each asset considered multiple factors from the perspective of a marketplace participant including revenue projections from existing customers, attrition trends, tradename life-cycle assumptions, marginal tax rates and expected profit margins giving consideration to historical and expected margins. The cost approach estimates the value for a subject asset based on the cost to replace the asset and reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset, less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation or obsolescence, with specific consideration given to economic obsolescence if indicated. These fair value measurement approaches are based on significant unobservable inputs, including management estimates and assumptions.

Current Assets and Liabilities

The fair value of $16,049,031 at issuancecurrent assets and have been recordedliabilities, excluding inventory, was assumed to approximate their carrying value as an adjustment to capital in excess of par.

F-10

NOTE 4. – OCTOBER 2016 REGISTERED DIRECT OFFERING

On October 19, 2016, the Company closed a registered direct offering with two institutional investors of units consisting of 8,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stockacquisition date due to the short-term nature of these assets and warrants to purchase 4,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.45 per share. liabilities.

The warrants were exercisable for a period of sixty-six (66) months after issuance, were not exercisable for a period of six months immediately following the issuance and had a fair value of approximately $3,380,000 at issuance. The holdersin-process and finished goods inventory acquired was estimated by applying a version of the warrants did not haveincome approach called the right to exercise any portion ofcomparable sales method. This approach estimates the warrants if the holders, together with its respective affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock (including securities convertible into common stock) outstanding immediately after the exercise; provided, however, that the holder could increase or decrease this limitation at any time, although any increase shall not be effective until the 61st day following the notice of increase and the holder could not increase this limitation in excess of 9.99%. The common stock and warrants were sold for $1.3425 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $10,707,823, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction. All the warrants issued in the offering were exercised as described in Note 3 above.

NOTE 5. – JULY 2016 REGISTERED DIRECT OFFERING

On July 27, 2016, the Company closed a registered direct offering of common stock and warrants consisting of 6,172,840 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 7,043,211 shares of the Company’s common stock. The warrants provided for an exercise price of $1.00 per share and 1,543,210 of the warrants were exercisable immediately and had a fair value of approximately $858,000the assets by calculating the potential revenue generated from selling the inventory and subtracting from it the costs related to the completion and sale of that inventory and a reasonable profit allowance for these remaining efforts. Based upon this methodology, the Company recorded the inventory acquired at issuance and 5,500,001 of the warrants were exercisable six months from the date of issuance and had a fair value of approximately $3,058,000 at issuance. All the warrants had a term of 5.5 years. The common stock and warrants were sold for $0.81 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $4,682,764, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction. All the warrants issued in the offering were exercised as described in Note 3 above. In addition, on July 27, 2016, the Company terminated an aggregate of 5.5 million warrants with exercise prices of $1.21 and $1.25 per share previously issued in conjunction with registered direct offerings in February of 2016 and June of 2015, as further described in Note 6 and Note 7.

NOTE 6. - FEBRUARY 2016 REGISTERED DIRECT OFFERING

On February 5, 2016, the Company closed a registered direct offering of common stock and warrants consisting of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share. The warrants were exercisable for a period of sixty-six (66) months after issuance, were not exercisable for a period of six months immediately following the issuance and had a fair value of approximately $1,940,000 at issuance. The common stock and warrants were sold for $1.10 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $5,091,791, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction. The warrants associated with this transaction were terminated on July 27, 2016.

NOTE 7. - JUNE 2015 REGISTERED DIRECT OFFERING

On June 2, 2015, the Company closed a registered direct offering of units consisting of 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants to purchase 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The warrants were exercisable for a period of sixty-six (66) months after issuance, were not exercisable for a period of six months immediately following the issuance and had a fair value of approximately $2,067,000 at issuance. The common stock and warrants were sold for $1.00 per unit, resulting in net proceeds to the Company in the amount of $5,576,083, after deducting expenses associated with the transaction. The warrants associated with this transaction were terminated on July 27, 2016.

F-11

NOTE 8. - JOINT VENTURE, CONSULTING AGREEMENT AND ASSOCIATED WARRANTS

On June 22, 2015, the Company terminated its joint venture arrangement with Crede CG III, Ltd. (“Crede”) and a third-party due to non-performance and other breaches of the arrangement by Crede and its principals. The Company also notified Crede that the Company reserved and did not waive any rights that the Company may have to assert any and all claims that it may have against Crede, its employees, agents, representatives or affiliates thereof, which are allowable by law or in equity, including claims for breach of the warrant agreements entered into with Crede.

The six-month Consulting Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), entered into with Crede on September 29, 2014, expired on March 29, 2015. The value of the warrants issued in conjunction with the Consulting Agreement in the aggregate amount of $4,070,000 and initially recorded as prepaid consulting fees have been fully amortized. The final amortization of the prepaid consulting fees amounted to $1,978,785 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and were included in General and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Four tranches of warrants were issued to Crede in conjunction with the Consulting Agreement as follows: Tranche 1A warrant to purchase 1,250,000 shares of Company common stock, Tranche 1B warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock, Tranche 2 warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock and Tranche 3 warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock. The Tranche 1A warrant contained an exchange rights clause that required derivative liability treatment under FASB ASC 480 - “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” The Company valued the derivative liability associated with the Tranche 1A warrant at inception at $2,810,000 and the liability was recorded on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets in Warrant liability. In March 2016, the Company provided notice to Crede that Crede repeatedly breached the activity restrictions contained in the warrant agreements and because the terms of the Tranche 1A warrant provide that the availability of the exchange feature was subject to compliance with such activity restrictions, the exchange rights clause contained in the Tranche 1A warrant was no longer available and was thereafter void (although the remaining amount of shares underlying the warrant without the exchange feature remained fully exercisable at $3.36 per share through the warrant expiration date of September 29, 2016). Accordingly, the Company reclassified the warrant liability associated with the Tranche 1A warrant to Capital in excess of par on its Consolidated Balance Sheets during March 2016. The Tranche 1A and Tranche 1B warrants all expired without exercise on September 29, 2016.

The Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 warrants were not exercisable unless and until certain revenue milestones were attained, as defined in the prior joint venture agreement between Crede and the Company. As stated above, the Company terminated the joint venture agreement on June 22, 2015. Accordingly, such revenue milestones will never be satisfied, and the Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 warrants will never be exercisable.

NOTE 9. - MANUFACTURING FACILITY

The Company’s manufacturing operations at its North Carolina factory were not at full production capacity throughout the year ended December 31, 2017, and the Company significantly expanded capacity during the second and third quarters of 2017 in order to fulfill anticipated new manufacturing contracts. In mid-May of 2017, the Company began the first phase of a manufacturing contract for an existing brand of filtered cigars under a new contract manufacturing agreement (the “New Agreement”) with a third-party and continued manufacturing a third-party MSA cigarette brand and other filtered cigars on a contract basis. The New Agreement has increased revenue, has resulted in an increase in the utilizationinventory of production capacity, and has required the hiring of additional personnel. Raw material component costs, direct manufacturing costs, and an overhead allocation are included$978, which was fully amortized in the Costthree month period ended June 30, 2022 in the Consolidated Statement of goods soldOperations and Finished goods inventory. GeneralComprehensive Loss.

Property, Plant and administrative expensesEquipment

The fair value of PP&E acquired was estimated by applying the factory amounted to $943,185, $551,678cost approach for personal property and $607,713leasehold improvements. The cost approach was applied by developing a replacement cost and adjusting for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016economic depreciation and 2015, respectively.obsolescence.

F-12

NOTE 10. - MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

Machinery and equipment at December 31, 2017 and 2016 consists of the following:

  Useful Life  December 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
Cigarette manufacturing equipment  3 - 10 years  $4,302,299  $3,193,580 
Office furniture, fixtures and equipment  5 years   110,499   103,945 
Laboratory equipment  5 years   32,193   19,076 
Leasehold improvements  5 years   106,429   - 
       4,551,420   3,316,601 
Less: accumulated depreciation      1,235,373   881,938 
Machinery and equipment, net     $3,316,047  $2,434,663 

Depreciation expense was $353,435, $326,124 and $319,699 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 11. - INVESTMENT IN ANANDIA

Leases

The Company (through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Botanical Genetics), holds an equity investmentrecognized operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets for office and manufacturing facilities in Anandia Laboratories, Inc., a Canadian plant biotechnology company (“Anandia”)(i) Las Vegas, Nevada (ii) Grass Valley, Oregon (iii) Prineville, Oregon, and (iv) Tygh Valley, Oregon, accordance with ASC 842, Leases. At December 31, 2017All facilities were subsequently divested as part of the GVB sale discussed in Note 2 “Discontinued Operations and 2016,Divestitures.”

The following table summarizes the Company’s investment balance in Anandia was $1,366,493discount rate and $1,020,313, respectively, and is classified within Other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s ownership was originally 25% and through a series of dilutive events, the Company’s ownership percentage became approximately 19% at December 31, 2017. A specific dilutive event on February 17, 2017 (the “Dilutive Event”), reduced the Company’s ownership below the 20% threshold for useremaining lease terms as of the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, theacquisition date:

Weighted average remaining lease term in years

3.8

Weighted average discount rate

8.3

%

The Company discontinued applying the equity method of accounting for the investment in Anandia, effectiveconcluded there were no off-market lease intangibles on the date of acquisition based on an evaluation of market rents per square foot, geographic location and nature of use of the Dilutive Event. Afterunderlying asset, among other considerations.

F-23

Intangible assets

The purchase price was allocated to intangible assets as follows:

Weighted Average

Fair Value

Amortization Period

Weighted Average

Definite-lived Intangible Assets

Assigned

    

(Years)

Discount Rate

Customer relationships

$

5,800

10

23.50%

Tradename

$

4,600

Indefinite

23.50%

Customer Relationships

Customer relationships represent the Dilutive Event,estimated fair value of contractual and non-contractual customer relationships GVB had as of the acquisition date. These relationships were valued separately from goodwill at the amount that an independent third party would be willing to pay for these relationships. The fair value of customer relationships was determined using the multi-period excess-earnings method, a form of the income approach. The estimated useful life of the existing customer base was based upon the historical customer annual attrition rate of 20%, as well as management’s understanding of the industry and product life cycles.

Tradename

Tradename represents the estimated fair value of GVB’s corporate and product names. The acquired tradename was valued separately from goodwill at the amount that an independent third party would be willing to pay for use of these names. The fair value of the tradename was determined by utilizing the relief from royalty method, a form of the income approach, with a royalty rate of 1.0%. The GVB tradename was assumed to have an indefinite useful life based upon long-term management expectations and future operating plans.

Deferred Taxes

The Company determined the deferred tax position to be recorded at the time of the GVB acquisition in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, resulting in recognition of deferred tax liabilities for future reversing of taxable temporary differences primarily for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. This resulted in a preliminary net deferred tax liability of $627, which includes the carryover basis of historical recognized deferred tax assets, liabilities and valuation allowance.

The net deferred tax liabilities recorded as a result of the acquisition of GVB was determined by the Company accounts for its investment in Anandia under the cost method.

The Company’s gain (loss) on the investment was $346,180, ($202,338) and ($95,684)to also provide future taxable temporary differences that allow for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The gain (loss) consistsCompany to utilize certain previously fully reserved deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company recognized a reduction to its valuation allowance resulting in a net tax benefit of (i) the Company’s pro-rata share of Anandia’s income (loss) in the amount of $16,872, ($144,690) and ($38,036) for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, (the gainapproximately $434 for the year ended December 31, 2017, reflects the Company’s proportionate gain only through the Dilutive Event) and, (ii) the amortization of an intangible asset of $1,199,000 represented by the2022.

Goodwill

The excess of the Company’s carryingpurchase price over the fair value of its investmentnet tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. A variety of factors contributed to the goodwill recognized, including the value of GVB’s assembled work force, the incremental value resulting from GVB’s capabilities in Anandiahemp/cannabis, operational synergies across the plant science platform, and the expected revenue growth over time that is attributable to increased market share from future products and customers. Goodwill recorded in the transaction will be non-deductible. 

F-24

Acquisition costs

During the year ended December 31, 2023, direct costs incurred as a result of the acquisition of RXP were $130, compared to direct costs incurred as a result of the acquisition of GVB of $1,046 during the year ended December 31, 2022. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred and included in Other operating expenses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

NOTE 4. – INVENTORIES

Inventories at December 31, 2023 and 2022 consisted of the following:

    

December 31, 

    

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Raw materials

$

3,580

$

7,090

Work in process

3

Finished goods

 

766

177

$

4,346

$

7,270

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company reserved certain leaf inventory totaling $7,720 resulting from restructuring initiatives implemented, as described in Note 18 “Other Operating Expenses, Net”. Inventory charges are included within Cost of goods sold on the Company’s shareConsolidated Statement of Anandia’s books valueOperations and Comprehensive Loss.

NOTE 5. – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property, plant and equipment, net at December 31, 2023 and 2022 consisted of the following:

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Leasehold improvements

$

262

$

232

Manufacturing equipment

7,254

6,780

Office furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

254

 

414

 

7,770

 

7,426

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

(4,377)

 

(3,734)

Property, plant and equipment, net

$

3,393

$

3,692

Depreciation expense was $852 and $673 for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

NOTE 6. – RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS, LEASE OBLIGATIONS, AND OTHER LEASES

The Company leases a manufacturing facility in Mocksville, North Carolina and an inventory storage facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

F-25

On January 1, 2023, the Company signed the lease agreement for the inventory storage facility. The lease has an initial monthly base rent of $15 (escalating 3.0% annually after the first year), an initial term of 36 months – with two twenty-four-month optional renewal options at the Company’s discretion.

On March 31, 2023, the Company extended the lease terms for its manufacturing facility. As a result of this lease modification, the Company re-measured the lease liability and adjusted the ROU asset on the modification dates.

The following table summarizes the Company’s discount rate and remaining lease terms as of September 15, 2014December 31, 2023:

Weighted average remaining lease term in years

5.9

Weighted average discount rate

9.0

%

Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2023 are as follows:

2024

$

396

2025

 

403

2026

422

2027

430

2028

449

Thereafter

414

Total lease payments

 

2,514

Less: imputed interest

 

(585)

Present value of lease liabilities

1,929

Less: current portion of lease liabilities

(231)

Total long-term lease liabilities

$

1,698

Operating lease costs for the amountyear ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, were $475 and $288, respectively.

Supplemental cash flow information for leases for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 are comprised of $7,526, $57,648the following:

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Cash paid for operating leases

$

436

$

276

Assets acquired under operating leases

$

1,602

$

NOTE 7. – INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Our intangible assets at December 31, 2023 and $57,648 for2022 consisted of the following:

Gross

Accumulated

 

Net Carrying

December 31, 2023

    

Carrying Amount

    

Amortization

 

Impairment

Amount

Definite-lived:

Patent

$

2,913

$

(1,622)

$

(487)

$

804

License fees

 

4,165

(1,666)

(65)

2,434

Total amortizing intangible assets

$

7,078

$

(3,288)

$

(552)

$

3,238

Indefinite-lived:

 

Trademarks

$

134

NA

$

-

$

134

MSA signatory costs

2,202

NA

-

2,202

License fee for predicate cigarette brand

350

NA

-

350

Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

$

2,686

NA

$

-

$

2,686

Total intangible assets, net

$

9,764

$

(3,288)

$

(552)

$

5,924

F-26

Gross

Accumulated

 

Net Carrying

December 31, 2022

    

Carrying Amount

    

Amortization

 

Amount

Definite-lived:

Patent

$

5,723

$

(3,588)

$

2,135

License fees

 

3,801

(1,417)

2,384

Total amortizing intangible assets

$

9,524

$

(5,005)

$

4,519

Indefinite-lived:

 

Trademarks

 

$

141

MSA signatory costs

2,202

License fee for predicate cigarette brand

 

350

Total indefinite-lived intangible assets

$

2,693

Total intangible assets, net

$

7,212

Aggregate intangible asset amortization expense comprises of the following:

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

    

2022

Cost of goods sold

$

11

$

10

Research and development

 

644

 

609

Total amortization expense

$

655

$

619

During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015, respectively. After the Dilutive Event,2022, the Company discontinued amortizing this intangible asset. In addition,incurred impairment charges of $1,375 and $35, respectively, related to write-downs and disposals of patents, licenses and trademarks as a result of a shift in strategy related to the Dilutive Event,nature and use of the related assets. Impairment charges during the year-ended December 31, 2023 consisted of $552 for patents and trademarks the Company recordedcontinues to hold but does not align with its current strategy, $772 was related to disposals of patents abandoned from future maintenance and renewal and $51 was related to disposals of trademarks abandoned. The Company also disposed of $1,501 of patents that had a gainnet book value of $0.

The impairment charges are included in accordance with the derecognition provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 323 (“ASC 323”). ASC 323 states that an investor (the Company) shall account for an issuance by an investee (Anandia) as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment in the investee and the investor will record a gain or loss resulting from the investee share issuance. As such, the Company recorded a gain of $336,834 during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as a result of the Dilutive Event.

See the Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies relating to ASU 2016-01 and Note 22 – Subsequent Events for additional information relating toOther operating expenses, net on the Company’s investment in Anandia.Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Estimated future intangible asset amortization expense based on the carrying value as of December 31, 2023 is as follows:

 

2024

 

2025

 

2026

2027

2028

Thereafter

Amortization expense

$

422

$

410

$

351

$

365

$

321

$

1,369

F-27

NOTE 12. - NOTES PAYABLE AND PATENT ACQUISITION8. – INVESTMENTS & OTHER ASSETS

Panacea Investment – Promissory Note:

On December 22, 2014,June 30, 2021, the Company entered into a PurchasePromissory Note Exchange Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”with Panacea Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. (“PLSH”) as a component of various investment transactions with the National Research Council of Canada (“NRC”) to acquire certain patent rights that the Company had previously licensed from NRC under a license agreement between the parties.PLSH. The Purchase Agreement provided for payment by the Company to NRC for the NRC patent rights a total amount of $1,213,000, of which $213,000promissory note was paid in cash at the closing on December 23, 2014, and with the remaining $1,000,000 balance to be paid in three equal installments of $333,333 in December of 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively, with no interest on the installment payments unless the Company defaults on any such installment payments. As such, the Company computed the present value of the note payable using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The resulting present value of the note payable amounted to $925,730 at December 31, 2014. After all scheduled installment payments made by the Company to NRC and the accretion of interest, the remaining present value of the note payable amounted to $0 and $307,938, respectively, at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The cost of the acquired patentsissued in the amount of $1,138,730 (cash$4,300 (the “Promissory note receivable”) with a maturity date of $213,000 plusJune 30, 2026 and a 0% interest rate. The Promissory note receivable is with J&N Real Estate Company, L.L.C., a related party of Panacea and is fully secured by a first priority lien on Panacea’s headquarters located in Golden, Colorado.

The Promissory note receivable was originally valued at $3,684 ($4,300 face value less $616 discount) and is included within the original discounted notes payableConsolidated Balance Sheets as “Other Assets.” Subsequently, on December 31, 2022 the Company and PLSH entered into a settlement agreement in which the amountCompany agreed to a reduction to the face value of $925,730) are includedthe Promissory note receivable of $500, in Intangible assets, netexchange for resolution to all contractual requirements surrounding the investment and business relationship. Accordingly, the Company recognized an extinguishment charge of note receivable of $500 less adjusted discount of $51 during the year-ended December 31, 2022.

As of October 16, 2023, the $3,800 Promissory note receivable was fully assigned in connection with the Senior Secured Credit Facility Amendment and Waiver. The remaining discount of $305 was extinguished and after recognizing consideration of $2,600, resulted in a loss on transfer of financial asset of $895 recorded as a component of Other income (expense) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. All previous license agreements between NRCStatement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Refer to Note 13 “Debt.” Through the date of assignment, the Company intended to hold the remaining outstanding Promissory note receivable to maturity and the Company were terminated as a conditionassociated discount will be amortized into interest income over the term of the Purchase Agreement.  note.

F-13

NOTE 13. - SEVERANCE LIABILITY

 The Company recorded an accrual for severance during the fourth quarter of 2014 in the initial amount of $624,320 in accordance with FASB ASC 712 - “Compensation - Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits.” The severance accrual relates to the October 25, 2014 termination of Joseph Pandolfino, the Company’s former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The prior Employment Agreement with Mr. Pandolfino provided that in certain circumstances Mr. Pandolfino would receive severance payments in the gross amount of $18,750 per month, subject to customary withholdings, over a term of 36 months. Amounts owed to Mr. Pandolfino have been discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. As a result of the severance benefit payments made during 2017 and 2016, the discounted current balance of the severance liability amounted to $0 and $199,657, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

NOTE 14.9. – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

FASB ASC 820 - “Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurement standards apply to certain financial assets and Disclosures” establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

·Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

·Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

·Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value.

A financial asset’s or a financial liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

on a recurring basis (each reporting period). For the Company, these financial assets and liabilities include its short-term investment securities and equity investments. The Company does not have any nonfinancial assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following table presents information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value:

Fair Value

December 31, 2023

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Liabilities

Detachable warrants

$

$

$

1,350

$

1,350

Derivative liability

557

557

Total liabilities

$

$

$

1,907

$

1,907

Fair Value

December 31, 2022

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Assets

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Money market funds

$

10,163

$

$

$

10,163

Corporate bonds

 

 

7,031

 

 

7,031

U.S. treasury securities

 

 

999

 

 

999

Total assets

$

10,163

$

8,030

$

$

18,193

F-28

Money market mutual funds are valued at their daily closing price as reported by the fund. Money market mutual funds held by the Company are open-end mutual funds that are registered with the SEC that generally transact at a stable $1.00 Net Asset Value (“NAV”) representing its estimated fair value. On a daily basis the fund’s NAV is determined by the fund based on the amortized cost of the funds underlying investments. The Company classifies its money market funds within Level 1 because it uses quoted market prices to determine their fair value. The Company classifies its commercial paper, corporate notes, certificates of deposit, and U.S. government bonds within Level 2 because it uses quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and each has a specified term and all level 2 inputs are observable for substantially the full term of each instrument.

  Asset and Liabilities at Fair Value 
  As of December 31, 2017 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
             
Assets                
Cash equivalents:                
Certificate of deposit $-  $3,000,000  $-  $3,000,000 
Short-term investment securities:                
Certificates of deposit  -   6,000,000   -   6,000,000 
Money market funds  41,526,540   -   -   41,526,540 
Corporate bonds      9,450,933   -   9,450,933 
U.S. government agency bonds  -   1,998,040   -   1,998,040 
Total cash equivalents and short-term investment securities $41,526,540  $20,448,973  $-  $61,975,513 
Liabilities                
Warrant liability (current) $-  $-  $216,490  $216,490 

Corporate bonds are valued using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities.

  Asset and Liabilities at Fair Value 
  As of December 31, 2016 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total 
             
Assets                
Cash equivalents:                
Certificate of deposit $-  $-  $-  $- 
Short-term investment securities:                
Certificates of deposit  -   -   -   - 
Money market funds  -   -   -   - 
Corporate bonds      -   -   - 
U.S. government agency bonds  -   -   -   - 
Total cash equivalents and short-term investment securities $-  $-  $-  $- 
Liabilities                
Warrant liability $-  $-  $58,681  $58,681 

The warrant liability isfollowing tables set forth a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale debt securities from amortized cost basis to fair value as of December 31, 2022:

Available for Sale Debt Securities

December 31, 2022

Amortized

Gross

Gross

Cost

Unrealized 

Unrealized 

Fair

    

Basis

    

Gains

    

Losses

    

Value

Corporate bonds

$

7,143

$

$

(112)

$

7,031

The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s available-for-sale debt securities at amortized cost basis and fair value by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2022:

December 31, 2022

Amortized

    

Cost Basis

    

Fair Value

Due in one year or less

$

7,143

$

7,031

The Company recognized interest income on short-term investment securities recorded in Interest income, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 of $52 and $546, respectively.

Detachable Warrants

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in fair value of the Company’s stock warrants accounted for as liabilities (Level 3 asset) for the period ended December 31, 2023:

Fair value measurement at January 1, 2023

$

Initial measurement (see Note 1 and 10)

4,214

Fair value measurement adjustment

(364)

JGB redemption of 166,667 warrants

(2,500)

Fair value measurement at December 31, 2023

$

1,350

F-29

The Omnia detachable warrants were measured at December 31, 2023 using a Monte Carlo valuation model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate per year

 

4.6

%

Expected volatility per year

 

90.9

%

Expected dividend yield

 

%

Contractual expiration

 

6.6

years

Exercise price

$

12.828

Stock price

$

0.19

The detachable warrants are measured at fair value using certain estimated factors such aswhich are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant unobservable inputs that are used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s detachable warrants include the volatility factor, anti-dilution provisions, and contingent put option. Significant increases or decreases in the volatility factor would have resulted in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Additionally, a change in probability regarding the anti-dilution provision or put option would have resulted in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

Derivative Liability

The derivative liability related to the debentures and embedded conversion option using was measured at December 31, 2023 using a binomial lattice valuation model under a “with and without” approach and contained the following assumptions:

Stock price volatility

 

104.1

%

Expected term

 

2.2

years

Stock price as of measurement date (per share)

$

0.19

Risk-free rate

 

4.3

%

Credit rating

CCC

Market yield (credit risk)

13.8

%

The debentures and derivative liability are measured at fair value using certain estimated factors which are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant unobservable inputs that are used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s derivative warrant liabilitiesliability include volatility. Significant increases (decreases)a decrease/increase in theour stock price, stock price volatility, input would result in acredit rating, and simulated stock price upon conversion could significantly higher (lower)change the fair value measurement.measurement as either an increase or decrease.

F-14

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Fair value standards also apply to certain assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

F-30

NOTE 15. -10. – CAPITAL RAISES AND WARRANTS FOR COMMON STOCK

The following tables summarize the Company’s warrant activity:

At December 31, 2017,

Warrants outstanding at January 1, 2022

Exercised

Issued

1,138,212

Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2022

1,138,212

Exercised

(18,084,052)

Abandoned

(325,205)

Issued

65,028,421

Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2023

47,757,376

# of warrants outstanding

Exercise price

Expiration date

July 2022 RDO warrants

65,042

$

30.75

July 25, 2027

Senior Secured Credit Facility - JGB

330,294

$

12.828

September 3, 2028

Subordinated Note - Omnia

45,000

$

12.828

September 3, 2030

July 6, 2023 RDO warrants

1,557,268

$

0.2042

January 10, 2029

July 19, 2023 RDO warrants

1,225,000

$

0.2042

July 20, 2028

October 2023 CMPO warrants

13,500,000

$

0.2042

October 19, 2028

Inducement warrants

31,034,772

$

0.2042

February 15, 2029

47,757,376

2022 Registered Direct Offering & Warrant Repricing

On July 21, 2022, the Company had outstanding warrantsand certain institutional investors (the “July 2022 Investors”) entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “July 2022 Securities Purchase Agreement”) relating to purchase 12,088,080the issuance and sale of shares of common stock pursuant to a registered direct offering (the “July 2022 Registered Offering” and, together with the July 2022 Private Placement (as defined below), the “July 2022 Offerings”). The July 2022 Investors purchased approximately $35,000 of shares, consisting of an aggregate of 1,138,221 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $30.75 per share, subject to certain restrictions. The net proceeds to the Company of which warrantsfrom the July 2022 Offerings, after deducting the fees and the Company’s offering expenses, were $32,484.

Pursuant to purchase 94,721 shares contain an anti-dilution feature and excluding 2,000,000 Tranche 2 and 3 warrants that will never become exercisable, as discussedthe July 2022 Securities Purchase Agreement, in Note 8.

During the year ended December 31, 2017,a concurrent private placement, the Company issued 11,293,211and sold to the July 2022 Investors warrants in conjunction with June 2017 Warrant Exchange Agreements. These warrants have an exercise price equal(the “July 2022 Warrants”) to $2.15 per share and arepurchase up to 1,138,221 shares of common stock (the “July 2022 Private Placement”). The July 2022 Warrants were exercisable for a period of six months from the date ofimmediately upon issuance for a period of five (5) years. See Note 3 for additional details.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, warrant holders exercised 12,763,238 warrants with 1,286,277 of such warrants exercised on a cashless basis. Additionally, 223,814 warrants expired unexercised during the year ended December 31, 2017.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,793,211 warrants in conjunction with three registered direct offerings, of which 2,500,000 warrants hadat an exercise price of $1.21 $30.75 per share 7,043,211 had an exercise price of $1.00 per sharecommon stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, and 4,250,000 had an exercise price of $1.45 per share. These warrants had a term of sixty-six (66) months. Additionally, the Company cancelled warrants totaling 5,500,000 previously issued in registered direct offerings in February of 2016 and June of 2015. See Notes 4, 5, 6 and 7 for additional details.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, warrant holders exercised 67,042 warrants, primarilyexpire on a cashless basis, and 6,831,115 warrants expired unexercised.

Outstanding warrants at December 31, 2017 consist of the following:

Warrant Description Number of
Warrants
  Exercise
Price
  Expiration 
          
December 2011 convertible NP warrants(3)  700,148  $1.3816   February 6, 2018 
August 2012 convertible NP warrants(1)  94,721  $0.9310   August 8, 2018 
June 2017 warrants pursuant to warrant exercise agreements  11,293,211  $2.1500   December 20, 2022 
             
Total warrants outstanding(2)  12,088,080         

(1)Includes anti-dilution features.
(2)Excludes 2,000,000 Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 warrants that will never become execrable, as discussed in Note 8.
(3)Warrants were exercised on a cashless basis prior to February 6, 2018.

The Company estimates the value of warrant liability upon issuance of the warrants and at each balance sheet date using the binomial lattice model to allocate total enterprise value to the warrants and other securities in the Company’s capital structure. Volatility was estimated based on historical observed equity volatilities and implied (forward) or expected volatilities for a sample group of guideline companies and consideration of recent market trends.

July 25, 2027.

As a result of the June 19, 2023 offering described below, certain of the July 2022 Investors and the Company entered a warrant reprice letter (the “Warrant Repricing”) and agreed to reduce the exercise price on the previously exercisable exchange rights containedissued 747,974 warrants owned by the investors participating in the Tranche 1AJune 19, 2023 offering from $30.75 to $7.05 and to add a provision in the warrants that upon any subsequent equity sales at a price per share lower than the financial instrument was previously considered a liability in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 480 - “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”). More specifically, ASC 480 requires a financial instrumentthen effective exercise price of such warrants, such exercise price shall be lowered to be classifiedsuch price at which the shares were offered. The Warrant Repricing is accounted for as a liability if such financial instrument containsmodification of a conditional obligation thatfreestanding equity-classified written call option, and therefore resulted in an immediate and incremental increase of approximately $2,025 in the issuer must or may settle by issuing a variable number of its equity securities if, at inception, the monetaryestimated fair value of the obligation is basedrelated 747,974 warrants, recorded as a component of Capital in excess of par value, with an offsetting equal amount recorded as equity issuance costs.

F-31

As a result of subsequent offerings, the exercise price on 747,974 warrants was automatically adjusted triggering non-cash deemed dividends as a known fixed monetary amount. result of the down-round adjustments. In July 2023 the exercise price was adjusted to $3.80 and $2.42, respectively, and further in October 2023 was adjusted to $0.525. All of the outstanding warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering.

The remaining 390,247 previously issued July 2022 Warrants were not repriced and on December 7, 2023, the Company was provided notice of irrevocable abandonment of 325,205 warrants. Accordingly, the Company has 65,042 remaining July 2022 Warrants with an exercise price of $30.75 and an expiration date of July 25, 2027.

June 19, 2023 Registered Direct Offering  

On June 19, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of shares of approximately $5,300 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 747,974 shares of common stock and 747,974 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $7.05 per unit.  The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were approximately $4,800.

The warrants were exercisable immediately upon issuance at an exercise price of $7.05 per share of common stock, expire on June 22, 2028 and are subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, including upon any subsequent equity sales at a price per share lower than the then effective exercise price of such warrants, then such exercise price shall be lowered to such price at which the shares were offered.

As a result of the actions by Crede that causedsubsequent offerings, the exchange rights feature to be voided (see Note 8 - Joint Venture, Consulting Agreement and Associated Warrants for additional information),exercise price on the Company reclassified the Tranche 1A warrant liability to Capital in excess of par. The Tranche 1A warrant expired in September 2016 unexercised.

The following table is a roll-forward summary of the warrant liability:

Fair value at December 31, 2014 $3,042,846 
Gain as a result of change in fair value  (144,550)
Fair value at December 31, 2015 $2,898,296 
Reclassification of warrant liability to capital in excess of par  (2,810,000)
Gain as a result of change in fair value  (29,615)
Fair value at December 31, 2016 $58,681 
Loss as a result of change in fair value  157,809 
Fair value at December 31, 2017 $216,490 

The aggregate net (loss) gain747,974 warrants was automatically adjusted triggering non-cash deemed dividends as a result of the down-round adjustments. In July 2023, the exercise price was adjusted to $3.80 and $2.42, respectively, and further in October 2023 was adjusted to $0.525. All of the outstanding warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering and no warrants issued in the June 2023 registered direct offering remain outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

July 6, 2023 Registered Direct Offering.  

On July 6, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of approximately $3,000 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 778,634 shares of common stock and 1,557,268 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $3.80 per unit. The warrants became exercisable six months after issuance at an exercise price of $3.80 per share of common stock and expire on January 10, 2029. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were approximately $2,722.

As a result of subsequent offerings, the exercise price on 1,557,268 warrants was automatically adjusted triggering non-cash deemed dividends as a result of the down-round adjustments. In July 2023, the exercise price was adjusted to $2.42 and further in October 2023 was adjusted to $0.525. 1,557,368 warrants that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2023 were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering in January 2024 (see Note 21 “Subsequent Events.”)

F-32

July 19, 2023 Registered Direct Offering.  

On July 19, 2023, the Company and certain investors entered into a securities purchase agreement relating to the issuance and sale of approximately $11,700 of shares and warrants, consisting of an aggregate of 4,373,219 shares of common stock and 8,746,438 warrants to purchase an equal number of shares, at a purchase price of $2.67 per unit. The warrants were exercisable immediately at an exercise price of $2.42 per share of common stock and expire five years after issuance. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering were approximately $10,742.

As a result of a subsequent offering, the exercise price on 8,746,438 warrants was automatically adjusted triggering non-cash deemed dividends as a result of the down-round adjustment. In October 2023 the exercise price was adjusted to $0.525. 7,521,438 of the warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering through December 31, 2023. 1,225,000 warrants remained outstanding with an exercise price of $0.1765 and an expiration date of July 19, 2028, of which 775,000 were subsequently exercised in January 2024 (see Note 21 “Subsequent Events.”).

.

October 2023- Public Equity Offering

On October 17, 2023, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and issue, in a registered public offering, (i) an aggregate of 7,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, (ii) warrants to purchase 20,000,000 shares of common stock (the “October Warrants”) and (iii) pre-funded warrants to purchase 2,400,000 shares of common stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”). The Common Warrants had an exercise price of $0.525, are immediately exercisable and have a term of exercise equal to five years following the original issuance date. The Pre-Funded Warrants have an exercise price of $0.0001, are immediately exercisable and will be able to be exercised at any time after their original issuance until such Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full. The shares were offered at a combined public offering price of $0.525 per share and two accompanying October Warrants. The Pre-Funded Warrants were offered at a combined public offering price of $0.5249 per Pre-Funded Warrant and two accompanying October Warrants.

In addition, the Company issued the placement agent warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the aggregate number of shares and Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering) at an exercise price of $0.65625, which represents 125% of the public offering price per share and accompanying October Warrant. The placement agent agreed not to exercise the such warrants until the Company subsequently increases its authorized shares of common stock.

The offering closed on October 19, 2023 with gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $5,250, before deducting the placement agent fees of $367 and other offering expenses payable by the Company of approximately $288. As a result of the offering, the exercise price on 11,799,654 previously outstanding warrants were automatically adjusted from $2.42 per share to $0.525 per share.

The Pre-Funded Warrants were subsequently exercised on a cashless basis in October 2023, resulting in issuance of 2,399,512 shares of common stock. 3,800,000 of the warrants were subsequently exercised in connection with the Warrant Inducement Offering through December 31, 2023. 13,500,000 warrants remained outstanding with an exercise price of $0.1765 and an expiration date of October 19, 2028, of which 10,800,000 were subsequently exercised in January 2024 (see Note 21 “Subsequent Events.”).

F-33

Warrant Inducement Offering

On November 28, 2023, the Company commenced a warrant inducement offering with the holders of the Company’s outstanding 31,779,654 warrants consisting of: (i) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about June 22, 2023; (ii) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about July 10, 2023; (iii) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about July 21, 2023; and/or (iv) the common stock purchase warrants of the Company issued on or about October 19, 2023 (collectively, the “Existing Warrants”), which Existing Warrants were exercisable for an equal number of shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.525. The Company agreed to issue new warrants (the “Inducement Warrants”) to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock equal to 200% of the number of shares of common stock issued pursuant to the exercise by the holders of the Existing Warrants during the inducement period, for cash, at a reduced exercise price equal to the Nasdaq Minimum Price (as defined in the as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d)).  

For the period from November 28, 2023 to December 31, 2023, the Company entered into warrant inducement agreements with certain holders of the Existing Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 15,517,386 shares of common stock at a reduced exercise price of $0.215. Pursuant to the warrant inducement agreements, the exercising holders of the Existing Warrants received 31,034,772 Inducement Warrants and the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $3,336 from the exercise of the Existing Warrants before deducting the placement agent fees of $234 and other offering expenses payable by the Company of approximately $58. As a result of the inducement and subsequent exercise, the Company determined the incremental fair value provided to the holders using Black Scholes and Monte Carlo models as (i) $883 increase in fair value due to the adjustment in exercise price of Existing Warrants attributable to down round pricing protection (ii) $6,596 fair value of Inducement Warrants issued to the holders that exercised Existing Warrants. The incremental fair value is recorded as non-cash deemed dividend. The proceeds of the warrant inducement and issuance of common stock are recorded as Capital in excess of par value. Refer to Note 21 “Subsequent Events.”

March 2023 JGB Warrants

In connection with the sale of the Debentures as described in Note 13 “Debt”, the Company issued the JGB Warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share. The JGB Warrants are exercisable for five years from September 3, 2023, at an exercise price of $19.125 per share, determined as a 50% premium to the VWAP on the closing date, subject, with certain exceptions, to adjustments in the event of stock splits, dividends, subsequent dilutive offerings and certain fundamental transactions. The JGB warrants initial fair value of $4,475 net of issuance costs of $139 (see Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements”), of which half of the warrants meet the criteria for liability classification due to a contingent put option which allows the holder to require that the Company redeem the warrants in cash for a purchase price equal to $15.00 upon certain conditional events such as change in control or event of default. Accordingly, at issuance half of the warrants with the put provision are classified as Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the amount of $2,898 whereas the remainder of the warrants without the put provision are equity classified and recorded as a component of Capital in excess of par value in the amount of $1,577. The valuation assumptions of the warrants at issuance, as detailed below, are the same for all warrants except for the put provision which derives a greater fair value.

As a result of the June 19, 2023 offering, the Company’s outstanding JGB warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share were automatically adjusted to be $12.828 exercise price for up to 496,960 shares of common stock. As a result of the anti-dilution provision being triggered, the Company recognized a non-cash deemed dividend of $367 in connection with these adjustments, recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and within Capital in excess of par value (as the Company has an accumulated deficit and therefore the deemed dividend is treated as paid out of Capital in excess of par value). There are no further anti-dilution adjustments on such warrants.

In connection with the Senior Secured Credit Facility Amendment and Waiver, the Company redeemed 166,667 of such warrants for an aggregate put price equal to $2,500.  See Note 13 “Debt.”  

F-34

The JGB detachable warrants were valued at the closing dates of the Senior Secured Credit Facility using a Monte Carlo valuation model with the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate per year

 

4.2

%

Expected volatility per year

 

88.1

%

Expected dividend yield

 

%

Contractual expiration

 

5.5

years

Exercise price

$

19.125

Stock price

$

13.65

March 2023 Omnia Warrants

In connection with the Subordinated Note as described in Note 13 “Debt”, the Company issued to Omnia, the Omnia Warrants to purchase up to 45,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Omnia Warrants”). The Omnia Warrants are exercisable for seven years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 amountedfrom September 3, 2023, at an exercise price of $12.828 per share, subject, with certain exceptions, to ($157,809), $29,615 and $144,550, respectively, which are included in Other income (expense) under Warrant liability (loss) gain - netadjustments in the accompanyingevent of stock splits, dividends, subsequent dilutive offerings and certain fundamental transactions. The Omnia warrants initial fair value was $1,316 (see Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements”), and meet the criteria for liability classification due to contingent put option which allows the holder to require that the Company redeem the warrants in cash for a purchase price equal to $30.00 upon certain conditional events such as change in control or event of default. The Omnia warrants are classified as Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated StatementsBalance Sheets.

The Omnia detachable warrants were valued at the closing dates of Operations. the Subordinated Note using a Monte Carlo valuation model with the following assumptions:

F-15

Risk-free interest rate per year

 

4.1

%

Expected volatility per year

 

83.8

%

Expected dividend yield

 

%

Contractual expiration

 

7.5

years

Exercise price

$

12.828

Stock price

$

13.65

ATM Offering

On March 31, 2023, the Company established an at-the-market common equity offering program (“ATM Program”), through which it may, through which it had the ability to offer and sell shares of common stock having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $50,000. The Company paid a 3.00% sales commission based on the gross proceeds of the sales price per share of common stock sold. On June 19, 2023, the Company terminated the ATM Program in connection with the June 2023 Capital Raise. The following table summarizesshows the Company’s warrant activity since December 31, 2015:number of shares sold under the ATM Program prior to its termination:

Number of
Warrants
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 201516,634,778
Warrants issued in conjunction with registered direct offering2,500,000
Unexercisable warrants(1)(2,000,000)
Warrants exercised during January 2016(67,042)
Warrants expired during January 2016(6,831,115)
June 2015 registered direct offering warrants cancelled(3,000,000)
February 2016 registered direct offering warrants cancelled(2,500,000)
Warrants issued in conjunction with July 2016 registered direct offering7,043,211
Additional warrants due to anti-dilution provisions2,089
Warrants expired during September 2016(2)(2,250,000)
Warrants issued in conjunction with October 2016 registered direct offering4,250,000
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 201613,781,921
Warrants expired during February 2017(172,730)
Warrants exercised during March 2017(202,500)
Warrants exercised during April 2017(162,000)
Warrants exercised during May 2017(221,366)
Warrants expired during May 2017(45,834)
Warrants exercised during June 2017(532,244)
Warrants issued pursuant to June 2017 warrant exercise agreements11,293,211
Warrants exercised pursuant to June 2017 warrant exercise agreements(11,293,211)
Warrants exercised during August 2017(240,667)
Warrants exercised during October 2017(85,000)
Warrants exercised during November 2017(26,250)
Warrants expired in November 2017(5,250)
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 201712,088,080
Composition of outstanding warrants:
Warrants containing anti-dilution feature94,721
Warrants without anti-dilution feature11,993,359
12,088,080

Year Ended

December 31, 

(in thousands, except for per-share data)

    

2023

Number of common shares issued

284

Weighted average sale price per share

$

9.65

Gross proceeds

$

2,741

Net proceeds

$

2,563

(1)Tranche 2 and Tranche 3 warrants that will never become exercisable, as discussed in Note 8.
(2)Tranche 1A and Tranche 1B warrants expired unexercised on September 29, 2016.

F-16

F-35

NOTE 16. -11. – RETIREMENT PLAN

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan under IRC Section 401(k). The plan covers all employees who meet the minimum eligibility requirements. Under the 401(k) plan eligible employees are allowed to make voluntary deferred salary contribution to the plan, subject to statutory limits. The Company has elected to make Safe Harbor Non-electiveNon-Elective Contributions to the plan for eligible employees in the amount of three percent (3%) of the employee’s compensation. Total employer contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 20152022 amounted to $98,368, $84,499$231 and $56,208,$198, respectively.

NOTE 17. -12. – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

License Agreements -and growing agreements Under its exclusive worldwide license agreement with North Carolina State University (“NCSU”), the Company is required to pay minimum annual royalty payments, which are credited against running royalties on sales of licensed products. The minimum annual royalty is $225,000. The license agreement continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be 2022. The license agreement also requires a milestone payment of $150,000 upon FDA approval or clearance of a product that uses the NCSU licensed technology. The Company is also responsible for reimbursing NCSU for actual third-party patent costs incurred. These costs vary from year to year and the Company has certain rights to direct the activities that result in these costs. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 the aggregate costs incurred related to capitalized patent costs and patent maintenance expense amounted to $71,596, $84,191 and $103,641, respectively.

On December 8, 2015, the Company entered into an additionalvarious license agreementand tobacco growing agreements (the “License”“Agreements”) with NCSU. Undervarious counter parties in connection with the terms ofCompany’s plant biotechnology business relating to tobacco. The schedule below summarizes the License,Company’s commitments, both financial and other, associated with each Agreement. Costs incurred under the Company paid NCSU a non-refundable, non-creditable lump sum license fee of $150,000. Additionally, the License calls for the Company to pay NCSU a non-refundable, non-creditable minimum annual royalties beginning on December 31, 2018 in the amount of $10,000. The minimum annual royalty payment increases to $15,000 in 2019, $25,000 in 2020 and 2021, and $50,000 per year thereafter for the remaining term of the License. The Company is also responsible for reimbursing NCSU for actual third-party patent costs incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the aggregate costs incurred related to capitalized patent costs and patent maintenance expense amounted to $31,947, $6,075 and $0, respectively. This License continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, expected to be in 2035.

On February 10, 2014, the Company entered into a sponsoredAgreements are generally recorded as research and development agreement (the “Agreement”) with NCSU. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company paid NCSU $162,408 over the two-year term of the Agreement, which grants certain licensed rights to the Company. The Company had extended the Agreement through January 31, 2017 at an additional cost of $85,681. In February 2018, the Company finalized an additional extension to this Agreement that obligates the Company to approximately $88,000 of additional sponsored research costs.

All payments made under the above referenced license agreement and the sponsored research and development agreement are initially recorded as a Prepaid expense on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently expensed on a straight-line basis over the applicable period and included in Research and development costsexpenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amounts expensed during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016Operations and 2015 were $232,140, $447,808 and $156,204, respectively.Comprehensive Loss.

Future Commitments

Commitment

 

Counter Party

 

Commitment Type

 

2024

 

2025

 

2026

 

2027

2028 & After

Total

    

License Agreement

NCSU

Minimum annual royalty

$

100

$

100

$

100

$

100

$

3,575

$

3,975

(1)

License Agreement

NCSU

Contract fee

150

250

250

650

(2)

Consulting Agreements

Various

Contract fee

214

24

238

(3)

Growing Agreements

Various

Contract fee

225

225

(4)

$

689

$

374

$

350

$

100

$

3,575

$

5,088

(1)F-17The minimum annual royalty fee is credited against running royalties on sales of licensed products. The Company is also responsible for reimbursing NCSU for actual third-party patent costs incurred, including capitalized patent costs and patent maintenance costs. These costs vary from year to year and the Company has certain rights to direct the activities that result in these costs.
(2)On November 1, 2023, the Company entered into a license agreement with NCSU for an exclusive sublicensable right and license under specific patent rights and plant variety rights for the field of use in specific licensed territories. Additional milestone fees could be required pending achievement of events pursuant to the agreement.
(3)As a requirement for a modified risk tobacco product and a condition of the marketing authorization by the FDA, the Company engaged various consultants to conduct post-market studies and research.
(4)Various R&D tobacco growing agreements.

F-36

On August 22, 2014, the Company entered into a Commercial License Agreement with Precision PlantSciences, Inc. (the “Precision License”). The Precision License grants the Company a non-exclusive, but fully paid up right and license to use technology and materials owned by Precision PlantSciences for a license feeTable of $1,250,000. The Precision License continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be in 2028. Contents

On August 27, 2014, the Company entered into an additional exclusive License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with NCSU. Under the License Agreement, the Company paid NCSU a non-refundable, non-creditable lump sum license fee of $125,000, and the Company must pay to NCSU an additional non-refundable, non-creditable lump sum fee of $75,000 upon issuance of a U.S. utility patent included in the patent rights. A patent was issued during the first quarter of 2017 under this clause, and accordingly, the $75,000 was due and payable to NCSU. The $75,000 cost is included in Research and development costs on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally, the License Agreement calls for the Company to pay NCSU three non-refundable, non-creditable license maintenance fees in the amount of $15,000 per annum in each of December 2015, 2016 and 2017. Beginning in calendar year 2018, the Company is obligated to pay to NCSU an annual minimum royalty fee of $20,000 in 2018, $30,000 in 2019, and $50,000 per year thereafter for the remaining term of the License Agreement.Litigation- The Company is also responsible for reimbursing NCSU for actual third-party patent costs incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the aggregated costs incurred relatedsubject to capitalized patent costs and patent maintenance expense amountedlitigation arising from time to $41,033, $43,740 and $75,351, respectively. The License Agreement continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be in 2034.

On September 15, 2014, the Company entered into a Sublicense Agreement with Anandia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Anandia Sublicense”). Under the terms of the Anandia Sublicense, the Company was granted an exclusive sublicensetime in the United States andordinary course of its business. The Company does not expect that the ultimate resolution of any pending legal actions will have a co-exclusive sublicense in the remaindermaterial effect on its consolidated results of the world, excluding Canada,operations, financial position, or cash flows. However, litigation is subject to the licensed Intellectual Property (more fully discussed in Note 11). The Anandia Sublicense calls for an up-front fee of $75,000, an annual license fee of $10,000, the payment of patent filing and maintenance costs, and a running royalty on future net sales. The Anandia Sublicense continues through the life of the last-to-expire patent, which is expected to be in 2035.

The Precision License, the License Agreement with NCSU and the Anandia Sublicense are included in Intangible assets, net in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and the applicable license fees will be amortized over the term of the agreements based on their last-to-expire patent date. Amortization expense during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 amounted to $98,022, $98,022 and $98,022, respectively, and was included in Research and development costs on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On September 28, 2015, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Botanical Genetics, entered into a Sponsored Research Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Anandia Laboratories Inc. (“Anandia”). Pursuant to the Agreement, Anandia is conducting research on behalf of the Company relating to the cannabis/hemp plant. The Agreement had an initial term of twelve (12) months from the date of the Agreement andinherent uncertainties. As such, there can be extended at the sole option of the Company for two (2) additional periods of twelve (12) months each (of which the option on the first twelve (12) month period has been extended). The Company paid Anandia $379,800 over the initial term of the Agreement. On March 13, 2017, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (the “Amendment”). The Amendment has a term of twelve (12) months and calls for the Company to pay Anandia a total of $785,100 in equal monthly installments of $65,425. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 expenses related to the Agreement amounted to $654,250, $263,400 and $116,400, respectively, and are included in Research and development costs on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company is evaluating the final twelve (12) month option which calls for the Company to pay Anandia $653,200 under the Agreement. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will have co-exclusive worldwide rights with Anandia to all the intellectual property resulting from the sponsored research between the Company and Anandia. The partyno assurance that commercializes such intellectual property in the future will pay royalties in varying amounts to the other party, with the amount of such royalties being dependent upon the type of products that are commercialized in the future. If either party sublicenses such intellectual property to a third-party, then the Company and Anandia will share equally in such sublicensing consideration.

F-18

 The Company had an R&D agreement with the University of Virginia (“UVA”) relating to nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco plants. The extended term of the R&D agreement with UVA expired on October 31, 2016. In December 2016, the Company entered into a new sponsored research agreement with UVA and an exclusive license agreement with the University of Virginia Patent Foundation d/b/a University of Virginia Licensing & Ventures Group (“UVA LVG”) pursuant toany pending legal action, which the Company will invest approximately $1,000,000 over a three-year period with UVA to create unique industrial hemp plants with guaranteed levels of THC below the legal limits and optimize other desirable hemp plant characteristics to improve the plant’s suitability for growing in Virginia and other legacy tobacco regions of the United States. This work with UVA will also involve the development and study of medically important cannabinoidscurrently believes to be extracted by UVA from the Company’s hemp plants. UVA and the Companyimmaterial, will conduct all activities in this scientific collaboration within the parameters of state and federal licenses and permits held by UVA for such work. The agreements with UVA and UVA LVG grant the Company exclusive rights to commercialize all results of the collaboration in consideration of royalty payments by the Company to UVA LVG. The Company incurred expenses under the agreementnot become material in the amount $296,710, $224,560 and $224,428 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. and are included in Research and development costs on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

future.Lease Agreements- The Company leases a manufacturing facility and warehouse located in North Carolina on a triple net lease basis. The lease commenced on January 14, 2014, and had an initial term of twelve (12) months. The lease contains four (4) additional extensions; with one lease extension being for an additional one (1) year and with the other three (3) lease extensions each being for an additional two (2) years in duration, exercisable at the option of the Company. The Company is currently in the second two-year lease extension term that will expire on October 31, 2019. The lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 amounted to approximately $156,000, $146,000 and $127,000, respectively. The future minimum annual lease payments if the Company exercises each of the additional extensions are approximately as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2018 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2019 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2020 - $169,000 
Year ended December 31, 2021 - $141,000 

 On August 14, 2017, the Company entered into a lease for warehouse space in North Carolina to store and operate tobacco leaf processing equipment, to store the Company’s proprietary tobacco leaf and to store inventory used in the Company’s contract manufacturing business. The lease calls for a monthly payment of $4,665, expires on August 14, 2018 and contains twelve-month renewal options as long as the Company continues to lease the warehouse. Future minimum lease payments will be approximately $56,000 per year for each subsequent year the warehouse space is leased by the Company.

During 2017 and 2016, the Company entered into three separate leases for warehouse space in North Carolina to accommodate its contract manufacturing business. As of December 31, 2017, each of these leases have been terminated with no future lease obligations.

The Company previously had a lease for its office space in Clarence, New York that was extended for an additional one-year renewal period that expired on August 31, 2017 and was subsequently leased on a month-to-month basis at a monthly lease payment of $5,267. On October 4, 2017, the Company entered a new lease for new office space at a new location with an initial three-year term and with a monthly lease payment of $6,375. The Company moved into the new lease space in February of 2018. Future minimum lease payments under the new office lease will be approximately $64,000, $76,000 and $76,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively.

 On May 1, 2016, the Company entered into a sublease for laboratory space in Buffalo, New York. The sublease calls for a monthly payment of $1,471 through April 30, 2018. Additionally, on February 1, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the initial sublease calling for the sublease of additional lab space at a cost of $1,219 per month, bringing the total monthly sublease obligation to $2,690. On April 26, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the sublease to extend the term of the sublease for an additional twelve (12) months, commencing on May 1, 2017 at a total cost of $2,770 per month for the total lease obligation. On February 21, 2018, the Company entered into a new sublease amendment that extended the sublease term through June 30, 2019, and calls for a monthly sublease payment of $5,706 beginning on March 1, 2018. Future minimum sublease payments for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019 will be approximately $63,000 and $34,000, respectively.

F-19

Litigation - In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes an accrued liability for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. In such cases, there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. When a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Company does not establish an accrued liability. As a litigation or regulatory matter develops, the Company, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluates on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. If, at the time of evaluation, the loss contingency related to a litigation or regulatory matter is not both probable and estimable, the matter will continue to be monitored for further developments that would make such loss contingency both probable and estimable. When a loss contingency related to a litigation or regulatory matter is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Company will establish an accrued liability with respect to such loss contingency and record a corresponding amount of litigation-related expense.related expenses. The Company will then continue to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of any such accrued liability.

In connection with ongoing restructuring efforts and the hemp/cannabis disposal group (see Note 2 “Divestitures and discontinued operations,” the Company has received unasserted claims related to disputed contracts, which could result in accrual of an additional amount up to $1,314 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company is vigorously defending its position against these claims.

Class Action

On April 26, 2016, Crede CG III, LTD. (“Crede”)January 21, 2019, Matthew Jackson Bull, a resident of Denver, Colorado, filed a complaintComplaint against the Company, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, and the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, in the United States District Court for the SouthernEastern District of New York (the “SDNY Court”) entitledCrede CG III, LTD.entitled: Matthew Bull, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. 22nd Century Group, Inc. Inc., Henry Sicignano III, and John T. Brodfuehrer, Case No. 1:19 cv 00409.

On January 29, 2019, Ian M. Fitch, a resident of Essex County Massachusetts, filed a Complaint against the Company, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, and the Company’s then Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entitled: Ian Fitch, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. 22nd Century Group, Inc., Henry Sicignano III, and John T. Brodfuehrer, Case No. 2:19 cv 00553.

On May 19, 2016, Crede28, 2019, the plaintiff in the Fitch case voluntarily dismissed that action. On August 1, 2019, the Court in the Bull case issued an order designating Joseph Noto, Garden State Tire Corp, and Stephens Johnson as lead plaintiffs.

On September 16, 2019, pursuant to a joint motion by the parties, the Court in the Bull case transferred the class action to federal district court in the Western District of New York, where it remains pending as Case No. 1:19-cv-01285.

Plaintiffs in the Bull case filed an Amended Complaint on November 19, 2019 that included seven counts, alleging among other things,alleges three counts: Count I sues the Company and Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer and alleges that the CompanyCompany's quarterly and annual reports, SEC filings, press releases and other public statements and documents contained false statements in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5; Count II sues Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b5(a) and (c); and Count III sues Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer for the allegedly breached and/or interfered with certain agreements entered into with Crede, includingfalse statements pursuant to Section 20(a) of the joint venture agreement relating to efforts to sell the Company’s proprietary tobacco into China, the Tranche 1A warrant and the prior securities purchase agreement with Crede.Securities Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint seeks moneyto certify a class, and unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorney's fees and costs.

F-37

On January 29, 2020, the Company and Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer filed a Motion to rescindDismiss the securities purchase agreement,Amended Complaint. On January 14, 2021, the Court granted the motion, dismissing all claims with prejudice. The Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on February 12, 2021 to obtain declaratorythe Second Circuit Court of Appeals. On May 24, 2022, after briefing and injunctive relieforal argument, the Second Circuit issued an order affirming in part, and reversing in part, the District Court’s dismissal order. The Second Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of the claims relating to requirethe non-disclosure of stock promotion articles, but reversed the District Court’s dismissal order of the claims alleging the non-disclosure of an SEC investigation.  The Second Circuit noted in its opinion, however, that the District Court had not addressed certain arguments raised by the Company and Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer in the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint as to these remaining claims, and remanded the case to the District Court to address these arguments for the dismissal of the remaining claims. On August 8, 2022, the Company and Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer filed a renewed motion to dismiss the remaining claims in the Amended Complaint to address the arguments not previously addressed by the District Court. On September 22, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition to the motion. On October 12, 2022, the Company and Messrs. Sicignano and Brodfuehrer filed a reply brief in further support of the motion. On January 6, 2023, the District Court denied the motion to dismiss.

The parties participated in a mediation on March 21, 2023 and reached an initial memorandum of understanding for settlement in principle to resolve the litigation and release all claims against the Company. On April 25, 2023, the parties filed with the Court the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement, which includes the final terms of the proposed settlement. The Court preliminarily approved the settlement on June 30, 2023, and scheduled a further settlement hearing for October 3, 2023. The Court entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice of the action on October 23, 2023. The settlement amount that the defendants paid is $3,000 and is fully covered by the Company’s insurance, which has been funded by the Company’s insurance carrier in an escrow account and anticipated to be disbursed in the first or second quarter of 2024. Accordingly, the Company has recorded an accrual for litigation settlement and corresponding indemnification receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023.

Shareholder Derivative Cases

On February 6, 2019, Melvyn Klein, a resident of Nassau County New York, filed a shareholder derivative claim against the Company, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and each member of the Company’s Board of Directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entitled: Melvyn Klein, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group v. Henry Sicignano, III, Richard M. Sanders, Joseph Alexander Dunn, Nora B. Sullivan, James W. Cornell, John T. Brodfuehrer and 22nd Century Group, Inc., Case No. 1:19 cv 00748. Mr. Klein brings this action derivatively alleging that (i) the director defendants supposedly breached their fiduciary duties for allegedly allowing the Company to issuemake false statements; (ii) the director defendants supposedly wasted corporate assets to Crede 2,077,555 sharesdefend this lawsuit and the other related lawsuits; (iii) the defendants allegedly violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b 5 promulgated thereunder for allegedly approving or allowing false statements regarding the Company to be made; and (iv) the director defendants allegedly violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 14a 9 promulgated thereunder for allegedly approving or allowing false statements regarding the Company to be made in the Company’s proxy statement.

On February 11, 2019, Stephen Mathew filed a shareholder derivative claim against the Company, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and each member of the Company’s common stock underBoard of Directors in the exchange provisionSupreme Court of the Tranche 1A warrant,State of New York, County of Erie, entitled: Stephen Mathew, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group, Inc. v. Henry Sicignano, III, John T. Brodfuehrer, Richard M. Sanders, Joseph Alexander Dunn, James W. Cornell, Nora B. Sullivan and entry of an injunction prohibiting22nd Century Group, Inc., Index No. 801786/2019. Mr. Mathew brings this action derivatively generally alleging the Company from selling tobacco into China withoutsame allegations as in the joint venture’s involvement.Klein case. The Amended Complaint also seeks declaratory relief, unspecified monetary damages, corrective corporate governance actions, and attorney’s fees and such other relief ascosts.

On August 15, 2019, the Court may deem justconsolidated the Mathew and proper.Klein actions pursuant to a stipulation by the parties (Western District of New York, Case No. 1-19-cv-0513). On May 3, 2019, the Court ordered the Mathew case stayed. This stay was applied to the Consolidated Action pursuant to the Court’s August 15, 2019 Order Consolidated Related Shareholder Derivative Actions and Establishing a Leadership Structure. As a result of the Court’s denial of the renewed Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, the May 3, 2019 stay will be lifted. No trial date has been set. We

F-38

believe that the claims are frivolous, meritless and that the Company and the individual defendants have substantial legal and factual defenses to the claims. We intend to vigorously defend the Company and the individual defendants against such claims.

On June 10, 2019, Judy Rowley filed a shareholder derivative claim against the Company, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and each member of the Company’s Board of Directors in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Erie, entitled: Judy Rowley, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group, Inc. v. Henry Sicignano, III, Richard M. Sanders, Joseph Alexander Dunn, Nora B. Sullivan, James W. Cornell, John T. Brodfuehrer, and 22nd Century Group, Inc., Index No. 807214/2019. Ms. Rowley brought the action derivatively alleging that the director defendants supposedly breached their fiduciary duties by allegedly allowing the Company to make false statements. The Complaint sought declaratory relief, unspecified monetary damages, corrective corporate governance actions, and attorney’s fees and costs. We believe that the claims are frivolous, meritless and that the Company hasand the individual defendants have substantial legal and factual defenses to the claims.

We intend to vigorously defend the Company and the individual defendants against such claims. On September 13, 2019, the Court ordered the litigation stayed pursuant to a joint stipulation by the parties. On August 3, 2022, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice by filing a stipulation of discontinuance with the Court. This dismissal was not pursuant to a settlement.

On May 19, 2016, CredeJanuary 15, 2020, Kevin Broccuto filed a shareholder derivative claim against the Company, the Company's then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and certain members of the Company's prior Board of Directors in the District Court of the State of Nevada, County of Clark, entitled: Kevin Broccuto, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group, Inc. v. James W. Cornell, Richard M. Sanders, Nora B. Sullivan, Henry Sicignano, III, and John T. Brodfuehrer, Case No. A-20-808599. Mr. Broccuto brings this action derivatively alleging three counts: Count I alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties; Count II alleges they committed corporate waste; and Count III that they were unjustly enriched, by allegedly allowing the Company to make false statements.

On February 11, 2020, Jerry Wayne filed a shareholder derivative claim against the Company, the Company's then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and certain members of the Company's prior Board of Directors in the District Court of the State of Nevada, County of Clark, entitled: Jerry Wayne, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group, Inc. v. James W. Cornell, Richard M. Sanders, Nora B. Sullivan, Henry Sicignano, III, and John T. Brodfuehrer, Case No. A-20-808599. Mr. Wayne brings this action derivatively alleging generally the same allegations as the Broccuto case. The Complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages, corrective corporate governance actions, disgorgement of alleged profits and imposition of constructive trusts, and attorney's fees and costs. The Complaint also seeks to declare as unenforceable the Company's Bylaw requiring derivative lawsuits to be filed in Erie County, New York, where the Company is headquartered.

On March 25, 2020, the Court ordered the Broccuto and Wayne cases consolidated and stayed pursuant to a joint stipulation from the parties. On June 27, 2022, the Court ordered that the stay continue until thirty (30) days after the District Court rules on the renewed Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint in the Noto Class Action case. As a result of the Court’s denial of the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, the June 27, 2022 stay will be lifted if the case is not resolved. No trial date has been set.

The parties participated in a mediation on March 21, 2023, and a subsequent mediation on October 17, 2023. On December 5, 2023, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Settlement to fully resolve all claims pending the Court’s approval of a motion for preliminary injunction, askingapproval of settlement. The settlement amount is $768 related to plaintiffs attorney and legal fees and is fully covered by the SDNY Court to requireCompany’s insurance. Accordingly, the Company to issue 2,077,555 shareshas recorded an accrual for litigation settlement and corresponding indemnification receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of its common stock to Crede underDecember 31, 2023.

On September 1, 2023, Kenneth Troup filed a shareholder derivative claim against the exchange provisionCompany, the Company's then Chief Executive Officer, Henry Sicignano III, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, John T. Brodfuehrer, and certain members of the Tranche 1A warrant. After conducting an evidentiary hearing on this motion on June 14, 2016, the SDNY Court denied Crede’s motion and held, among other things, that Crede did not prove the potential for irreparable harm or a likelihoodCompany's Board of success on its claim for such 2,077,555 shares under the Tranche 1A warrant, and that there was a likelihood that Crede had violated the Activity Restrictions as defined and containedDirectors in the Tranche 1A warrant, which would bar Crede’s claim for such shares from the Company.

Following such ruling, on July 11, 2016, the Company filed a motion to sever the Crede lawsuit into two separate cases, requesting all claims relating to the Tranche 1A warrant and the securities purchase agreement to stay in the SDNY Court and all claims relating to the China joint venture agreement to be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (the “WDNY Court”)entitled: Kenneth Troup, derivatively on behalf of 22nd Century Group v. Nora Sullivan, James Mish, Michael Koganov, Anthony Johnson, Richard Sanders, Lucille Salhany, Andy Arno, James W. Cornell,

F-39

Henry Sicignano, III, and John T. Brodfuehrer, and 22nd Century Group, Inc., whereCase No. 1:23-cv-00916. Mr. Troup brings this action derivatively generally alleging the Company’s headquarters are located. On January 20, 2017,same allegations as in the SDNY Court granted the Company’s motion.

Klein case. The Complaint seeks declaratory relief, unspecified monetary damages, corrective corporate governance actions, and attorney’s fees and costs. On February 14, 2017, Crede voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit against9, 2024, defendants filed an unopposed Motion to Consolidate the CompanyTroup action with the consolidated derivative cases, which would include the Troup case in the WDNY Court.

On February 21, 2017, the SDNY Court granted the Company’s request to file a motion for summary judgment for the claims remaining in the SDNY Court, with all discovery in the case being deferred until after the SDNY Court conducts a hearing and issues its decision on the summary judgment motion of the Company.

On March 20, 2017, the Company filed its motion for summary judgment for the claims remaining in the SDNY Court. The response by Crede to the Company’s summary judgment motion was filed by Crede on May 1, 2017. On May 15, 2017, the Company filed its response to Crede’s filing.

On December 28, 2017, the SDNY Court issued its decision in response to the Company’s motion for summary judgement, with such decision (i) granting the Company’s motion for summary judgement relating to Count II of the Amended Compliant, which eliminates Crede’s claim to rescind the prior securities purchase agreement, dated September 17, 2014, and denies Crede’s claim for the return of any money from the Company under that securities purchase agreement, and (ii) denying the Company’s motion for summary judgement on the remaining Counts of the Amended Compliant. In this decision, the SDNY Court also found that Crede breached the Activity Restrictions as defined and contained in the Tranche 1A warrant. As a result of this decision by the SDNY Court, the parties will now proceed with discovery in the case in preparation for a trial on the remaining Counts III, IV and V of the Amended Complaint, which relate to Crede’s claim (i) to exchange the Tranche 1A warrant for 2,077,555 shares of our common stock even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant, (ii) for an unquantified additional amount of shares of our common stock that allegedly still remains under the Tranche 1A warrant even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant; and (iii) for alleged damages for the alleged breach of the Tranche 1A warrant in an amount in excess of $18 million, plus costs and interest, even though Crede breached the Activity Restrictions contained in the Tranche 1A warrant. On January 26, 2018, the SDNY Court entered a case management order that such discovery be completed by May 18, 2018 and scheduling a pretrial conference for May 23, 2018.

preliminary settlement described above.

We believe that the claims are frivolous, meritless and that the Company hasand the individual defendants have substantial legal and factual defenses to the claims. We intend to vigorously defend the Company and the individual defendants against such claims.

Insurance Litigation

In November 2022, there was a fire at the Company’s Grass Valley manufacturing facility in Oregon, which resulted in a total loss of the facility. The Company submitted an insurance claim with Dorchester Insurance Company, Ltd. (“Dorchester”) for casualty loss and business interruption coverage which was acknowledged on November 23, 2022. Dorchester funded $5,000 of casualty loss insurance but has failed to issue any payments in connection with the Company’s business interruption claim.

      On July 19, 2023, the Company filed a Complaint against Dorchester in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Pendleton Division, Case No. 2:23-cv-01057-HL. The Company is alleging breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing and negligence per se. The Company is seeking full recovery of its business interruption claim under the policy plus direct, indirect and consequential damages resulting from Dorchester’s continued delay in issuing coverage payments. Discovery is ongoing. No trial date has been set.

Needle Rock Farms – Settlement Agreement

During March 2023, the Company negotiated and entered into a settlement agreement related to water rights dispute with the adjacent property owner for Needle Rock Farms in which the Company agreed to pay $250 in cash upon execution of the settlement, transferred certain farm equipment with net book value of $272, and accrued an additional payment of $225 that is contingent on either the sale of the farm or will be paid within one year. The total charges of $747 recorded in connection with the settlement agreement is included in discontinued operations within Other operating expenses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

KeyGene Dispute

On April 3, 2019, the Company entered into the Framework Collaborative Research Agreement with KeyGene in the field of hemp/cannabis. On April 30, 2021, the Company and KeyGene entered into a First Amended and Restated Framework Collaborative Research Agreement which extended the agreement term, from first quarter 2024 to first quarter 2027, and preserves the Company’s option for an additional 2-year extension, through first quarter of 2029. On March 30, 2022, the Company and KeyGene entered into a new Framework Collaborative Research Agreement for a term of three years in the field related to the hops plant. On January 8, 2024, the Company formally terminated the new Framework Collaborative Agreement, as amended, related to hemp/cannabis and hops. KeyGene is seeking payment in the amount of $1,885 for current and future services under the Framework Collaborative Agreement and has invoiced the Company $881 for services performed. The parties anticipate mediating the dispute although no mediation date has been set.


Maison Dispute

On January 23, 2024, the Company received a Notice of Intent to Arbitrate from Maison Placements Canada Inc. (“Maison”) in connection with the Company’s March 2023 Senior Secured Credit Facility transaction (infra).  Maison claims it is owed fees for closure of the Senior Secured Credit Facility transaction as a result of discussions with former Company personnel and a purported letter of engagement dating from 2021.  The Company believes it has substantial defenses to Maison’s claims and intends to defend itself vigorously.

F-40

NOTE 13. – DEBT

The Company has defendeda senior secured credit facility (the “Senior Secured Credit Facility”), which consists of three-year $21,053 Debentures (as defined below) and intends$2,865 subordinated promissory note (the “Subordinated Note). The Debentures were issued at a 5% original issuance discount and are subject to continuea 5% exit payment.

Debt related to defend against these claims vigorously.the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Subordinate Note as of December 31, 2023, consists of the following:

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Senior Secured Credit Facility

 

$

11,805

 

$

Subordinated Note

3,554

Unamortized discount on loan and deferred debt issuance costs

(1,453)

Total debt

$

13,906

$

Current portion of long-term debt

(5,848)

Total long-term debt

$

8,058

$

F-20

Debentures

NOTE 18. - EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

On March 3, 2023, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with JGB Partners, LP (“JGB Partners”), JGB Capital, LP (“JGB Capital”) and JGB Capital Offshore Ltd. (“JGB Offshore” and collectively with JGB Partners and JGB Capital, the “Holders”) and JGB Collateral, LLC, as collateral agent for the Holders (the “Agent”) which pursuant to the agreement, the Company sold 5% original issuance discount senior secured debentures with an aggregate principal amount of $21,053. The Debentures bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum, payable monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each month and on the maturity date. The Debentures mature on March 3, 2026. At the Company’s election, subject to certain conditions, interest can be paid in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof. The Debentures are subject to an exit payment equal to 5% of the original principal amount, or $1,053, payable on the maturity date or the date the Debentures are paid in full (the “Exit Payment”). Any time after, March 3, 2024, the Company may irrevocably elect to redeem all of the then outstanding principal amount of the Debentures for cash in an amount equal to the entire outstanding principal balance, including accrued and unpaid interest, the Exit Payment and a prepayment premium in an amount equal to 3% of the outstanding principal balance as of the prepayment date (collectively, the “Prepayment Amount”). Upon the entry into a definitive agreement that would effect a change in control (as defined in the Debentures) of the Company, the Agent may require the Company to prepay the outstanding principal balance in an amount equal to the Prepayment Amount. Commencing on May 1, 2024, at its option, the holder of a Debenture may require the Company to redeem 2% of the original principal amount of the Debentures per calendar month which amount may at the Company’s election, subject to certain exceptions, be paid in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination thereof.

 

The following table sets forthCompany’s obligations under the computationDebentures can be accelerated upon the occurrence of basiccertain customary events of default. In the event of a default and diluted earningsacceleration of the Company’s obligations, the Company would be required to pay the Prepayment Amount, liquidated damages and other amounts owing in respect thereof through the date of acceleration.

The Debentures contain customary representations, warranties and covenants including among other things and subject to certain exceptions, covenants that restrict the Company from incurring additional indebtedness, creating or permitting liens on assets, making or holding any investments, repaying outstanding indebtedness, paying dividends or distributions and entering into transactions with affiliates. Substantially all of the company’s assets, including intellectual property, are collateralized and at risk if Debenture obligation is not satisfied. In addition, the Company is required to maintain at least $7,500 on its balance sheet as restricted cash in a separate account and has financial covenants to maintain certain quarterly revenue targets.

F-41

In connection with the sale of the Debentures, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share (the “JGB Warrants”), which had an initial fair value of $4,475 net of issuance costs of $139 (see Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 10 “Capital Raise and Warrants for Common Stock”). On June 22, 2023, as a result of the June 19, 2023 offering, the Company’s outstanding JGB warrants to purchase up to 333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock for an exercise price of $19.125 per share were automatically adjusted to be $12.828 exercise price for up to 496,960 shares of common stock. There are no further anti-dilution adjustments on such warrants.

On October 16, 2023, the Company entered into a Waiver and Amendment Agreement (the “October Amendment”) with each of the subsidiaries of the Company executing the Debentures, the Holders and the Agent, pursuant to which, among other things, (a) the Holders waived an event of default under Section 7(d) of the Debentures which required the Company to achieve revenue of at least $18,500 for the yearsquarter ended September 30, 2023 (the “waiver”), (b) the parties agreed to amend Schedule E of the Debentures to reduce the Revenue Target (as such term is defined in the Debentures), for the quarter ended December 31, 2017, 20162023, to $15,500, and 2015:(c) the Company agreed to release to the Purchasers the $7,500 that the Company was required to maintain in a separate account (the “Escrow Funds”) which Escrow Funds were be applied to, and reduce, the outstanding principal amount of the Debentures on a dollar-for-dollar basis.

 

  December 31,  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
          
Net loss attributed to common shareholders $(13,029,117) $(11,581,430) $(11,031,931)
             
Denominator for basic earnings per share-weighted average shares outstanding  101,161,380   79,842,773   68,143,284 
             
Effect of dilutive securities:            
Warrants, restricted stock and options outstanding  -   -   - 
             
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share-weighted average shares adjusted for dilutive securities  101,161,380   79,842,773   68,143,284 
             
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.13) $(0.15) $(0.16)

As additional consideration for the waiver, the Company agreed to assign, transfer and convey to the Agent, the Company’s entire right, title and interest in and to (i) the Promissory Note made by J&N Real Estate Company, L.L.C. (“J&N”) payable to the Company in the principal amount of $3,800 and (ii) the Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing dated June 30, 2021, between J&N, as borrower, for the benefit of the Company, as lender (collectively, the “Pledged Indebtedness”). Upon assignment of the Pledged Indebtedness, the Company recognized the $2,600 of consideration in exchange to be applied as a $2,000 reduction of the Put Price (as defined below), $600 reduction of the outstanding principal amount of Debentures and $895 loss on sale of financial asset.

 

SecuritiesIn connection with the waiver, the Company and Holders agreed to exercise the outstanding put provision to redeem 166,667 Warrants for an aggregate put price equal to $2,500 (the “Put Price”), which was concurrently reduced by $2,000, as described above, with the remaining $500 payable by the Company on the Maturity Date recorded as Other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. No cash was exchanged as a result of executing the October Amendment.

Subsequently, on December 22, 2023, the Company, the Holders and the Agent entered into an Amendment Agreement (the “December Amendment”) pursuant to which the Holders and the Agent consented to the Purchase Agreement, as amended by the GVB Amendment (see Note 2 “Discontinued Operations and Divestitures”). In consideration of the Holders and the Agents’ consent, the Company agreed to (i) pay to the Agent, a cash payment of $2,200 to reduce the outstanding principal of the Debentures (which includes the cash portion of the New Purchase Price paid directly to Agent by Buyer which consists of a cash payment of $1,100 and an additional $1,100 paid by the Company), (ii) a 12% secured promissory note issued to the Company’s senior lender, on behalf of and at the direction of the Company, in an aggregate principal amount of $2,000 (the “GVB Promissory Note”), (iii) assign the GVB Insurance Proceeds to the Agent until the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest, has been repaid in full; provided that the first $1,000 of Insurance Proceeds in excess of $5,000 shall be applied as stated above, and (iv) post-closing enter into a deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement with respect to 224 acres of real property in Delta County, Colorado commonly known as Needle Rock Farms, resulting in a non-monetary exchange yielding additional debt reduction of $1,000.  As of December 31, 2023, the $2,000 GVB Promissory Note and $1,000 real estate farm asset are pledged to the senior lender for principal reduction and accordingly $3,000 of the Senior Secured Credit Facility is recorded as Current portion of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

F-42

Additionally, the Company, the Holders and the Agent agreed to amend the Debentures to (i) allow the Holders to voluntarily convert the Debentures, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s common stock (“Voluntary Conversion Option”) on the earlier of (i) June 30, 2024 and (ii) the public announcement of a Fundamental Transaction at a conversion price equal to the lower of (x) $1.00 per share and (y) the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on June 29, 2024 (the “Conversion Price”), and (ii) include a mandatory prepayment of the outstanding principal of the Debentures in an amount equal to 20% of the net cash proceeds of any issuance by the Company of any of its stock, or other Equity Interests (as defined in the Debentures) or the incurrence or issuance of any indebtedness. The Voluntary Conversion Option remains subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders and the Company is required pursuant to the December Amendment to use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such approval.

Additional terms of the December Amendment include a financial covenant holiday through the third quarter of 2024 and revised certain covenants thereafter to reflect the sale of the Purchased Interests, including lowering the Company’s quarterly revenue targets.

In accordance with ASC 470-60 Troubled Debt Restructurings by Debtors and ASC 470-50, Debt Modifications and Extinguishment, the Company performed an assessment of whether the transaction was deemed to be a troubled debt restructuring, and if no, whether the transaction was deemed modification of existing debt, or an extinguishment of existing debt and new debt.

The October Amendment was concluded to be a modification, and not an extinguishment, based on an analysis of the present value of future cash flows. A new effective interest rate was determined, and the debt continued to be amortized. The December Amendment was concluded to be an extinguishment, due to the addition of a substantive conversion option. As a result, the pre-amended debt carrying value was extinguished and the new debt was recorded at fair value, which is subsequently amortized using the effective interest method. Extinguishment charges were excluded$5,158 and recorded in Interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

The Company analyzed the conversion feature of the December Amendment for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 and determined that the embedded conversion features should be classified as a bifurcated derivative because the exercise price of these convertible notes are subject to a variable conversion rate. The Company has determined that the conversion feature is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and is therefore not afforded equity treatment. In accordance with AC 815, the Company has bifurcated the conversion feature of the note and recorded a derivative liability at fair value in the amount of $557 as a component of Other Long-Term Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 9 “Fair Value Measurement” for additional information related to measurement of the debentures and derivative liability.

Subordinated Note

On March 3, 2023, the Company executed a Subordinated Promissory Note (the “Subordinated Note”) with a principal amount of $2,865 in favor of Omnia Ventures, LP (“Omnia”). The Subordinated Note refinanced the 12% Secured Promissory Note with a principal amount of $1,000 dated as of October 29, 2021 payable to Omnia (the “October Note”) and the 12% Secured Promissory Note with a principal amount of $1,500 dated as of January 14, 2022 payable to Omnia (the “January Note”, and together with the October Note, the “Original Notes”), which were assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of GVB Biopharma (see Note 3 “Business Acquisitions”). The accrued PIK interest refinanced from the computationOriginal Notes was $365.

Under the terms of earningsthe Subordinated Note, the Company is obligated to make interest payments in-kind (the “PIK Interest”). The PIK Interest accrues monthly at a compounding rate of 26.5% per share forannum. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 the PIK Interest accrual amounts were $695. The Company is not permitted to prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance on the Subordinated Note prior to maturity. The maturity date of the Subordinated Note is May 1, 2024. The Subordinated Note includes customary event of default provisions. The Subordinated Note is subordinated to the Debenture pursuant to a Subordination Agreement between the Company, the Agent and 2015 because they would have been anti-dilutiveOmnia.

F-43

In connection with the Subordinated Note, the Company issued to Omnia, warrants to purchase up to 45,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Omnia Warrants”). The Omnia Warrants are exercisable for seven years from September 3, 2023, at an exercise price of $12.828 per share, subject, with certain exceptions, to adjustments in the event of stock splits, dividends, subsequent dilutive offerings and certain fundamental transactions, as more fully described in the Omnia Warrants.  The Omnia warrants initial fair value was $1,316 (see Note 9 “Fair Value Measurements” and 10 “Capital Raise and Warrants for Common Stock”).

Contractual maturities under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Subordinate Note through maturity, excluding any discounts or premiums, as of December 31, 2023 is as follows:

  December 31,  December 31,  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Warrants  12,088,080   13,781,921   16,634,778 
Options  8,156,691   5,650,679   3,161,642 
   20,244,771   19,432,600   19,796,420 

 

2024

 

2025

 

2026

 

2027

2028

Thereafter

Future minimum principal payments

$

5,848

$

$

8,058

$

$

$

The fair values of the warrants at issuance of $5,791, together with the Debentures original issuance discount of $1,053, Debentures exit payment of $1,053, and third-party debt issuance costs of $801, are being amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the respective debt instrument, recorded as Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The components and activity of unamortized discount and deferred debt issuance costs related to the Senior Secured Credit Facility and Subordinated Note is as follows:

Total

Issuance

$

8,698

Amortization during the year

(2,087)

Debt extinguishment charges

(5,158)

December 31, 2023

$

1,453

NOTE 19. -14. – NOTES AND LOANS PAYABLE

The table below outlines our notes payable balances as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Insurance loans payable

$

543

$

689

Total current notes and loans payable

$

543

$

689

Insurance loans payable

During the second quarter of 2023, the Company renewed its Director and Officer (“D&O”) insurance for a one-year policy premium totaling $1,626. The Company paid $285 as a premium down payment and financed the remaining $1,341 of policy premiums over ten months at a 7.88% annual percentage rate. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2023, the Company expanded its D&O coverage, resulting in additional financing of $143, at 9.38% annual percentage rate over six months.

During the second quarter of 2022, the Company renewed its Director and Officer (“D&O”) insurance for a one-year policy premium totaling $2,394. The Company paid $400 as a premium down payment and financed the remaining $1,994 of policy premiums over ten months at a 3.25% annual percentage rate. Additionally, during the third quarter of 2022, the Company expanded its D&O coverage as a result of the acquisition of GVB, resulting in an additional premium down payment of $90 and financing of $168, under the same terms as the original one-year policy.

The Company also has other insurance loans payables related to pollution, property, and general liability across the Company.

F-44

As of December 31, 2023, all estimated future principal payments to be made under the above notes and loans payable will be paid in 2024.

NOTE 15. – EQUITY BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Compensation Plan

On April 12, 2014,May 20, 2021, the stockholders of the Company22nd Century Group, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the 22nd Century Group, Inc. 20142021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “OIP”“2021 Plan”) and the authorization of 5,000,000 shares thereunder. On April 29, 2017, the stockholders approved an amendment to the OIP to increase the number of shares available for issuance by 5,000,000 shares.. The OIP2021 Plan allows for the granting of equity and cash incentive awards to eligible individuals over the life of the OIP,2021 Plan, including the issuance of up to an aggregate of 10,000,000333,334 shares of the Company’s common stock, in addition to any remaining shares under the Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to awards under the OIP.2021 Plan. The OIP2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan was amended on June 16, 2023, increasing the authorized shares by 233,334. The 2021 Plan has a term of ten years and is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to determine the various types of incentive awards that may be granted to recipients under this planthe 2021 Plan and the number of shares of common stock to underlie each such award under the OIP.2021 Plan. As of December 31, 2017,2023, the Company had available 2,933,956606,406 shares remaining for future awards under the OIP.2021 Plan.

Compensation Expense

The Company recognized the following compensation costs, net of actual forfeitures, related to RSUs and stock options:

Year Ended

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Sales, general, and administrative

$

2,052

$

5,252

Research and development

 

179

 

182

Total equity based compensation - continuing operations

2,231

 

5,434

Total equity based compensation - discontinued operations

448

 

55

Total equity based compensation

$

2,679

$

5,489

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2023, and 2022, equity-based compensation expense reversals due to employee termination forfeitures amounted to $1,960 and $84, respectively. Additionally, the Company issued stock optionrecorded $523 and $1,237 of accelerated equity compensation expense, respectively, in connection with the vesting of an employees’ outstanding equity awards as part of termination severance agreements. Amounts are recorded as Selling, general and administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

F-45

Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). We typically grant RSUs to employees and non-employee directors. The following table summarizes the changes in unvested RSUs from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2023.

Unvested RSUs

Weighted

Average

Number of

Grant-date

    

Shares

    

Fair Value

in thousands

$ per share

Unvested at January 1, 2022

 

211

$

37.50

Granted

 

236

29.40

Vested

(154)

31.65

Forfeited

(24)

35.85

Unvested at December 31, 2022

269

$

31.88

Granted

293

12.44

Vested

(147)

29.67

Forfeited

(260)

20.86

Unvested at December 31, 2023

155

$

15.69

The fair value of RSUs that vested during the OIP for 2,692,000 shares to eligible individuals having vesting periods ranging from one to three years from the date of the award. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2023 and 2022 was approximately $1,838 and $4,505, respectively, based on the Company issued stock option awards fromprice at the OIPtime of vesting. As of December 31, 2023, unrecognized compensation expense for 2,389,037 sharesRSUs amounted to eligible individuals having vesting periods ranging from six months$823 which is expected to three and one-half years frombe recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.7 years. In addition, there is approximately $786 of unrecognized compensation expense that requires the dateachievement of the awards. Allcertain milestones which are not yet probable.

Stock Options. Our outstanding stock option awardsoptions were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of the award, and all restricted stock awards were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE American on the date of the award.

For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded compensation expense related toThere was no stock option grant activity during 2023 and restricted stock awards of $941,650, $880,509 and $1,326,393, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no issuances of stock or stock options to third-party service providers. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued restricted stock in the amount of 15,811 shares and issued stock options in the amount of 100,000 shares to a third-party service provider. The Company recorded equity-based compensation expense related to the third-party providers for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 in the amount of $0, $30,873 and $280,362, respectively, and does not include equity-based compensation under the Crede Consulting Agreement in the amount of $0, $0, and $1,978,785 for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

F-21

As of December 31, 2017, unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted shares and stock options amounted to approximately $3,886,000 which is expected to be recognized approximately as follows: $1,595,000, $951,000 and $569,000 during 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively. Approximately $771,000 of the unrecognized compensation expense relates to previously issued stock options, with the vesting of such stock options being based on the achievement of a certain milestone, and the attainment of such milestone cannot be determined at this time.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following assumptions were used for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

  2017  2016  2015 
Risk-free interest rate (weighted average)  2.05%  1.31%  1.60%
Expected dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
Expected stock price volatility  90%  90%  90%
Expected life of options (weighted average)  5.56 years   4.87 years   8.96 years 

The Company estimated the expected volatility based on data used by a peer group of public companies. The expected term was estimated using the contract life of the option. The risk-free interest rate assumption was determined using yield of the equivalent U.S. Treasury bonds over the expected term. The Company has never paid any cash dividends and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the Company assumed an expected dividend yield of zero.

2022. A summary of all stock option activity since December 31, 2015January 1, 2022 is as follows:

     Weighted  Weighted
Average
Remaining
  Aggregate 
  Number of
Options
  Average
 Exercise Price
  Contractual
Term
  Intrinsic
Value
 
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  3,161,642  $1.10         
Granted 2016  2,489,037  $0.97         
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  5,650,679  $1.04         
Granted in 2017  2,692,000  $1.76         
Exercised in 2017  (85,988) $0.79         
Expired in 2017  (100,000) $1.43         
Outstanding at December 31, 2017  8,156,691  $1.28   7.3 years  $11,533,400 
                 
Exercisable at December 31, 2017  3,617,670  $1.10   5.8 years  $6,151,390 

Weighted

Weighted

Average

Average

Remaining

Aggregate

Number of

Exercise

Contractual

Intrinsic

    

Options

    

Price

    

Term

    

Value

in thousands

$ per share

Outstanding at January 1, 2022

 

345

$

24.75

 

  

 

 

Exercised

 

(10)

17.40

 

  

 

 

  

Forfeited

 

(7)

20.85

 

  

 

 

  

Expired

(1)

41.40

Outstanding at December 31, 2022

 

327

24.82

 

  

 

 

  

Forfeited

(101)

21.29

Expired

(7)

41.40

Outstanding at December 31, 2023

219

$

26.34

1.9

years

$

Exercisable at December 31, 2023

213

$

25.95

1.8

years

$

There wereThe intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the current market value or the market value upon exercise of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. In addition, there is approximately $190 of unrecognized compensation expense for stock options granted duringthat requires the achievement of certain milestones which are not yet probable.

F-46

NOTE 16. – LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 2016,2022, respectively. Outstanding warrants, options, and restricted stock units were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as the effect was antidilutive.

Year Ended

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Net loss from continuing operations

$

(54,686)

$

(36,553)

Net loss from discontinued operations

(86,089)

(23,248)

Net loss

$

(140,775)

$

(59,801)

Deemed dividends

(9,992)

Net loss available to common shareholders

$

(150,767)

$

(59,801)

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

20,711

12,856

Basic and diluted loss per common share from continuing operations

$

(2.64)

$

(2.84)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from discontinued operations

(4.16)

(1.81)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from deemed dividends

(0.48)

Basic and diluted loss per common share

$

(7.28)

$

(4.65)

Anti-dilutive shares are as follows as of December 31 (in thousands):

Warrants

47,757

1,138

Options

219

327

Restricted stock units

155

269

48,131

1,734

NOTE 17. – REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from contract manufacturing organization (“CMO”) customer contracts that consist of obligations to purchasemanufacture the customers’ branded filtered cigars and cigarettes. Additional revenues are generated from sale of the Company’s proprietary low nicotine content cigarettes, sold under the brand name VLN®, or research cigarettes sold under the brand name SPECTRUM®.

The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a totalperformance obligation by transferring control of 2,692,000the product to a customer. For certain CMO contracts, the performance obligation is satisfied over time as the Company determines, due to contract restrictions, it does not have an alternative use of the product and 2,489,037 shares, respectively.it has an enforceable right to payment as the product is manufactured. The weighted average grant date fair valueCompany recognizes revenue under those contracts at the unit price stated in the contract based on the units manufactured. Revenue from the sale of options issued duringthe Company’s products, which include excise taxes and shipping and handling charges billed to customers, is recognized net of cash discounts, sales returns and allowances. There was no allowance for discounts or returns and allowances at December 31,  2023 and December 31,  2022. Excise taxes recorded in Cost of Goods Sold on the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 20172023 and 20162022 was $1.28$10,413 and $0.66,$12,619, respectively.

F-47

Disaggregation of Revenue

The total fair valueCompany’s net revenue is derived from customers located primarily in the United States and is disaggregated by the timing of options that vested during years ended December 31, 2017revenue. Revenue recognized from Tobacco products transferred to customers over time represented 63% and 2016 amounted to $750,265 and $1,242,110, respectively. During74%, for the year ended December 31, 2017, 85,988 options were exercised2023 and 2022, respectively.

The following table presents net revenues by significant customers, which are defined as any customer who individually represents 10% or more of disaggregated product line net revenues:

Year Ended

December 31, 

2023

2022

Customer A

31.49

%

23.61

%

Customer B

23.92

%

23.22

%

Customer C

21.70

%

35.20

%

All other customers

22.89

%

17.97

%

Contract Assets and Liabilities

Unbilled receivables (contract assets) represent revenues recognized for performance obligations that have been satisfied but have not been billed. These receivables are included as Accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Customer payment terms vary depending on the terms of each customer contract, but payment is generally due prior to product shipment or within extended credit terms up to twenty-one (21) days after shipment. Deferred Revenue (contract liabilities) relate to down payments received from customers in advance of satisfying a cashless basis resultingperformance obligation. This deferred revenue is included as Deferred income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Total contract assets and contract liabilities are as follows:

December 31, 

December 31, 

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

    

2021

Unbilled receivables

 

$

1,053

 

$

354

 

$

178

Deferred income

(726)

(688)

(119)

Net contract assets (liabilities)

$

327

$

(334)

$

59

During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recognized $688 and $119 of revenue that was included in the issuancecontract asset balance as of 51,927 sharesDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 respectively.

F-48

NOTE 18. – OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES (INCOME), NET

The components of “Other operating expenses (income), net” were as follows:

Year Ended

December 31, 

    

2023

    

2022

Restructuring costs:

Impairment of intangible assets (see Note 7)

$

1,375

$

35

Impairment of fixed assets

56

Professional services

763

Severance (see Note 1)

221

Total Restructuring costs

2,415

35

Acquisition and transaction costs

223

-

Gain on sale or disposal of property, plant and equipment

(111)

(362)

Total other operating expenses (income), net

$

2,527

$

(327)

Restructuring costs

During the third quarter of 2023, the Company undertook various restructuring activities in an effort to better align its internal organizational structure and costs with its strategy, as well as preserve liquidity. As a component of the restructuring, the Company has initiated a process to evaluate strategic alternatives with respect to the Company’s common stock. No options were exercised duringtobacco assets. The process will include consideration of a range of strategic, operational and financial transactions and alternatives, such as business combinations, asset sales, licensing agreements, alternate financing strategies and other options.

As a result, the Company incurred $2,415 in restructuring costs for the year ended December 31, 2016.2023, which included costs related to employee termination, professional services and consulting, and long-lived asset impairment.

F-22

NOTE 20. -19. – INCOME TAXES

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system, including a Federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%. The Company’s income tax provision (benefit) reflects the effect of this change in Federal corporate tax rates, primarily from the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, including prior net operating loss carry-forwards. The effect of the rate change attributable to the TCJA on the Company’s effective tax rate was a decrease of approximately 46% in the net deferred tax assets before the valuation allowance. Since the Company is in a full valuation allowance situation, the change in the Federal corporate rate had no effect on the calculation of the Company’s tax provision, which remained at zero.

The following is a summary of the components giving rise to the (benefit) provision for income tax provision (benefit)taxes from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162023 and 2015:2022:

 2017  2016  2015 
       

    

2023

    

2022

Current:            

 

  

 

  

Federal $-  $-  $- 

$

$

State  -   -   - 

 

40

 

14

Total current  -   -   - 
            

Foreign

 

 

Total current provision

$

40

$

14

Deferred:            

 

  

 

  

Federal  1,263,677   (2,424,497)  (3,372,964)

(11,351)

 

(6,610)

State  214,628   21,452   (155,352)

 

(736)

 

(4,404)

Total deferred  1,478,305   (2,403,045)  (3,528,316)

Foreign

 

 

Total deferred benefit

 

(12,087)

 

(11,014)

Change in valuation allowance  (1,478,305)  2,403,045   3,528,316 

 

12,094

 

11,021

 $-�� $-  $- 

Total income tax provision

$

47

$

21

F-49

The (benefit) provision (benefit) for income tax from continuing operations varies from that which would be expected based on applying the statutory federal rate to pre-tax accountingbook loss, including the effect of the change in the U.S. corporate income tax rates, as follows:

 2017 2016 2015 
        

    

2023

    

2022

    

Statutory federal rate (34.0)% (34.0)% (34.0)%

 

21.0

%  

21.0

%  

Other items (2.4) (0.2) 0.0 

 

0.2

 

(0.8)

 

Derivative liability 0.4 11.9  (0.5)
Stock based compensation 2.0 1.5  3.1 

 

(0.8)

 

(1.3)

 

Research and development credit carryforward (1.8) - - 

 

0.4

 

 

State tax provision, net of federal benefit 1.1 0.1  (0.9)
Federal tax rate change 46.1 -  - 

State tax, net of federal benefit

 

1.3

 

12.0

 

162(m) limitation

 

(0.2)

 

(0.9)

 

Valuation allowance  (11.4)  20.7   32.3 

 

(22.0)

 

(30.1)

 

        
Effective tax rate (benefit) provision  0.0%  0.0%  0.0%

Effective tax rate

 

(0.1)

%  

(0.1)

%  

Individual components of deferred taxes consist of the following as of December 31:

 2017 2016 2015 
       

    

2023

    

2022

Deferred tax assets:       

 

  

 

  

Net operating loss carry-forward $9,917,641 $11,626,143 $7,745,734 

$

54,453

$

34,029

Accounts receivable reserve - 3,499 3,499 
Inventory 48,011 96,934 38,707 

 

2,020

 

220

Stock-based compensation 388,925 282,850 1,599,916 

 

862

 

1,144

Start-up expenditures 279,709 477,917 514,680 

 

155

 

175

Research and development credit carryforward 232,198 - - 

 

1,424

 

1,205

Loss on equity investment 11,760 139,676 68,877 

Accrued bonus

 

133

 

458

Severance liability - 69,860 147,070 

 

95

 

151

Credit loss reserves

2

Research and development costs

1,617

813

Operating lease obligations

 

476

 

229

Capital loss on investment

2,449

2,209

Note payable and warrant liability

581

Other  4,272  21,423  9,272 

 

1,758

 

50

  10,882,516  12,718,302  10,127,755 

$

66,025

$

40,683

Deferred tax liabilities:       

 

  

 

  

Machinery and equipment (220,888) (316,232) (227,186)

 

(283)

 

(221)

Patents and trademarks (558,760) (807,137) (767,044)

 

(193)

 

(203)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 

(467)

 

(225)

Other intangible assets  (124,953)  (138,713)  (80,349)

 

(385)

 

(334)

 (904,601) (1,262,082) (1,074,579)

 

(1,328)

 

(983)

Valuation allowance  (9,977,915)  (11,456,220)  (9,053,176)

 

(64,763)

 

(39,759)

       

Net deferred taxes $- $- $- 

$

(66)

$

(59)

F-23

The Company has incurred a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $47,000,000$193,322 as of December 31, 2023 that do not expire. The Company had accumulated an NOL carryforward of approximately $46,920 through December 31, 2017 and this amount is being carried forward to future years andNOL carryforward begins to expire in 2031.2030. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has a research and development credit carryforward of approximately $1,424 that begins to expire in 2030. The Company generated a capital loss carryover of approximately $9,932 as of December 31, 2023, that begins to expire in 2026. Utilization of these NOL carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation in the case of equity ownership changes, as defined by law. Due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the future, before they expire, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce the net deferred tax asset to zero. This NOL isThese carryforwards are included in the net deferred tax asset that has been fully offset by the valuation allowance. UtilizationThe valuation allowance increased for continuing operations by $12,094 and $11,021 for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, and increased an additional $12,910 due to tax attributes that were generated as a part of discontinued

F-50

operations but remain on a prospective basis with continuing operations due to the NOL carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation (orCompany filing a consolidated US Federal return for the NOL’s may expire unutilized) in the case of equity ownership changes, as defined by tax law.

year ended December 31, 2023.

ASC 740 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement for uncertain income tax positions that are taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return. The Company has evaluated its tax positions and believes there are no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2017.   2023.

NOTE 20. – QUARTERLY REVENUE AND EARNINGS DATA – UNAUDITED

    

Three Months Ended

December 31, 

September 30, 

June 30, 

March 31, 

    

2023

    

2023

    

2023

    

2023

Revenues, net

$

7,357

$

7,871

$

8,050

$

8,926

Gross profit (loss)

$

(7,829)

$

77

$

(961)

$

17

Net loss from continuing operations (2)

$

(22,068)

$

(8,081)

$

(13,707)

$

(10,830)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from continuing operations (1)

$

(0.66)

$

(0.41)

$

(0.92)

$

(0.75)

Three Months Ended

December 31, 

September 30, 

June 30, 

March 31, 

2022

    

2022

    

2022

    

2022

Revenues, net

$

9,951

$

11,535

$

9,970

$

9,045

Gross profit

$

(44)

$

636

$

928

$

328

Net loss from continuing operations (3)

$

(11,114)

$

(10,490)

$

(7,699)

$

(7,250)

Basic and diluted loss per common share from continuing operations (1)

$

(0.77)

$

(0.75)

$

(0.63)

$

(0.67)

(1)The quarterly per share data in this table has been rounded and therefore may not sum to total year-to-date EPS.
(2)For the quarter ended December 31, 2023, net loss from continuing operations increased from the previous current year quarters, mainly due to an inventory leaf reserve charge of $7,720 and loss on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $5,158.
(3)For the quarter ended December 31, 2022, net loss from continuing operations increased from the previous current year quarters, mainly due to higher personnel and strategic consulting costs.

NOTE 21. – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

NOTE 21. - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited)Increase in Authorized Shares

 

Below is selected quarterly financial data forOn February 15, 2024, our stockholders approved an amendment (the “Articles Amendment”) to our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, to increase the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31, 
  2017  2017  2017  2017 
             
Revenue, net $2,231,517  $3,897,206  $4,530,865  $5,940,656 
                 
Gross (loss) profit $(273,897) $(165,055) $(340,369) $71,409
                 
Loss from operations $(2,969,949) $(3,282,525) $(3,274,081) $(3,773,309)
                 
Net loss $(2,621,277) $(3,355,624) $(3,316,634) $(3,735,582)
                 
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.03) $(0.04) $(0.03) $(0.03)

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31,  June 30,  September 30,  December 31, 
  2016  2016  2016  2016 
             
Revenue, net $3,019,056  $2,827,658  $3,097,648  $3,335,617 
                 
Gross profit (loss) $123,646  $(140,913) $(184,618) $(227,814)
                 
Loss from operations $(3,228,404) $(2,830,830) $(2,595,812) $(2,732,801)
                 
Net loss $(3,252,452) $(2,902,354) $(2,679,988) $(2,746,636)
                 
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.04) $(0.04) $(0.03) $(0.03)

NOTE 22. - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company (through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Botonical Genetics) has an equity investment in Anandia (see Note 11 for a discussionnumber of the investment). On January 16, 2018, Anandia closed a private placement financing of common shares raising approximately $10.8 million. Subsequent to this financing, the Company’s ownership in Anandia was reduced to approximately 15%.

In January and February of 2018, the Company issued 426,180authorized shares of common stock sixty-six million, six hundred sixty-six thousand six hundred and sixty-seven (66,666,667) to various investorstwo hundred fifty million (250,000,000), which Articles Amendment was filed and effective with the Secretary of the State of Nevada on February 15, 2024.

F-51

Warrant Inducement

For the period from January 1, 2024 to February 15, 2024, the date of Stockholder Approval, the Company entered into warrant inducement agreements with certain holders of the Existing Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 13,132,268 shares of common stock at a reduced weighted average exercise price of approximately $0.1844. Pursuant to the warrant inducement agreements, the exercising holders of the Existing Warrants received 26,264,536 Inducement Warrants and the Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $2,421 from the cashless exercise of 700,148 warrants to purchase sharesthe Existing Warrants. Additionally, on the date of Stockholder Approval, the exercise price of the Company’s common stock.57,299,308 outstanding Inducement Warrants, was reduced to $0.1765 based on the lowest Nasdaq Minimum Price (as defined in the as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d)) during the inducement period.

F-24

F-52

Table of Contents

Item 15(b).Financial Statement Schedules

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

The following table summarizes the Company’s valuation and qualifying accounts from December 31, 2014:

  Allowance  Reserve for  Deferred tax 
  for doubtful  inventory  valuation 
  Accounts  valuation  allowance 
Qualifying account valuation at December 31, 2014 $-  $50,623  $5,524,860 
Additions charged to costs and expenses during 2015  10,000   60,000   3,528,316 
Deductions during 2015  -   -   - 
Qualifying account valuation at December 31, 2015  10,000   110,623   9,053,176 
Additions charged to costs and expenses during 2016  -   145,000   2,403,044 
Deductions during 2016  -   -   - 
Qualifying account valuation at December 31, 2016  10,000   255,623   11,456,220 
Additions charged to costs and expenses during 2017  -   95,000   - 
Deductions during 2017  (10,000)  (155,623)  (1,478,305)
Qualifying account valuation at December 31, 2017 $-  $195,000  $9,977,915 

Item 15(c).Item 15(b).Exhibits

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this report, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company, its subsidiaries or other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

·

·

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

·

·

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

·

·

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

·

·Were

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. We acknowledge that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, we are responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this report not misleading. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this report and the Company’s other public files, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov.

54

Exhibit No.

Description

2.13.1

Investment Agreement, dated April 11, 2014, by and between 22nd Century Group, Inc. and Anandia Laboratories Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 18, 2014).

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Commission on December 1, 2010).

3.1.1

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 4, 2014).

3.23.1.2

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on December 11, 2023).

3.2

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Commission on January 30, 2014).

3.2.1

Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 28, 2015).

4.14.1*

Description of Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12

4.2

Form of Tranche 1AWarrant (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 25, 2022).

4.3

Form of Amended Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Debentures dated March 3, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 28, 2023).

4.4

Form of JGB Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2023).

4.5

Form of Omnia Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2023).

4.6

Form of Inducement Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 30, 2014)November 29, 2023).

56

4.24.7

Form of WarrantWaiver and Amendment Agreement (incorporated(Incorporated by reference tofrom Exhibit 4.110.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 19, 2017)October 16, 2023).

10.1†4.8

2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated hereinForm of Common Warrant (Incorporated by reference tofrom Exhibit 4.34.1 to the Company’s Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 30, 2011).

10.2†Employment Agreement dated as of January 25, 2011, by and between the Company and Henry Sicignano III (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 1, 2011)October 18, 2023).

10.3††4.9

Form of Placement Agent Warrant (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 18, 2023).

10.1††

License Agreement dated March 6, 2009 between North Carolina State University and 22nd Century Limited, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form S-1 registration statement filed with the Commission on August 26, 2011).

10.3.110.1.1

Amendment dated August 9, 2012 to License Agreement dated March 6, 2009 between North Carolina State University and 22nd Century Limited, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 20, 2012).

55

10.410.2

Letter Agreement between the Company and North Carolina State University dated November 22, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 23, 2011).

10.5†10.3†

Employment Agreement between John BrodfuehrerAmended and the Company dated March 19, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed on March 25, 2013).

10.6†Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2013).
10.7†Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2013).
10.8†Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement underRestated 22nd Century Group, Inc. 20142021 Omnibus Incentive Plan as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2from Appendix B to the Company’s Form 8-Kdefinitive proxy statement filed with the Commission on April 14, 2014).25, 2023)

10.9†10.4†

Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under 22nd Century Group, Inc. 20142021 Omnibus Incentive Plan as amended and restated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 toexhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the CommissionCurrent Report on April 14, 2014).

10.10†Employment Agreement dated May 12, 2014 by and between the Company and Thomas James (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 14, 2014)21, 2021).

57

10.11  *††10.5†

Research FundingForm of Executive RSU Award Agreement dated December 14, 2016 with The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, a not-for-profit Virginia educational institutional of the Commonwealth of Virginiaunder 22nd Century Group, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 toexhibit 10.3 of the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20178-K filed with the Commission on March 8, 2017)May 21, 2021).

10.12  *††10.6†

Exclusive LicenseForm of Director RSU Award Agreement dated December 14, 2016 with the University of Virginia Patent Foundation d/b/a University of Virginia Licensing & Venturesunder 22nd Century Group, a Virginia non-profit corporationInc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 toexhibit 10.4 of the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20178-K filed with the Commission on March 8, 2017)May 21, 2021).

10.13†10.7†

22nd Century Group, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (incorporated by reference from Appendix A to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed on March 17, 2017)22, 2019).

10.14†10.8

EmploymentSecurities Purchase Agreement dated October 31, 2017 between Dr. James E. SwaugerMarch 3, 2023 with each of the purchasers party thereto and JGB Collateral, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as collateral agent for the CompanyPurchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2023)

10.8.1

Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated March 3, 2023 with each of the purchasers party thereto and JGB Collateral, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as collateral agent for the Purchasers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 28, 2023)

10.9

Subordinated Promissory Noted dated March 3, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 9, 2023)

10.10

Equity Purchase Agreement dated November 20, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 2, 2017).27, 2023)

21.1*10.10.1

Subsidiaries.Amendment to Equity Purchase Agreement dated December 22, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 28, 2023)

23.1*10.11

Form of Inducement Letter (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 29, 2023)

10.12

License Agreement with NCSU dated November 2, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 8, 2023)

19.1*

Insider Trading Policy

21.1*

Subsidiaries

23.1*

Consent of Freed Maxick CPAs, P.C.

31.1*

Section 302 Certification.

56

31.2*

31.2*

Section 302 Certification.

32.1*

Written Statement of Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18.U.S.C §1350.

101*

97.1*

Compensation Recovery Policy

101*

Interactive data files formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

101.INS XBRLInstance Document*

101.INS XBRL

Instance Document*

101.SCH XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Schema ocument*Document*

101.CAL XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*

101.DEF XBRL

Taxonomy

Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*

101.LAB XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*

101.PRE XBRL

Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

Exhibit 104

Cover Page Interactive Data File – The cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document*

* Filed herewith.

† Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

†† Certain portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment order. An unredacted copy of the exhibit has been filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the request for confidential treatment.

58

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

57

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

22nd CENTURY GROUP, INC.

Date:

March 7, 201828, 2024

By: 

/s/ Henry Sicignano IIILawrence D. Firestone

Henry Sicignano III

Lawrence D. Firestone

President,

Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:

March 7, 201828, 2024

By: 

/s/ John T. BrodfuehrerR. Hugh Kinsman

John T. Brodfuehrer

R. Hugh Kinsman

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:
March 7, 2018
By:
/s/ Henry Sicignano III

Date:

March 28, 2024

By:

Henry Sicignano III

/s/ Nora B. Sullivan

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Nora B. Sullivan
Director

Date:

March 7, 201828, 2024

By:

/s/ Joseph Alexander Dunn, Ph.D.Richard M. Sanders

Joseph Alexander Dunn, Ph.D.

Richard M. Sanders
Director

Date:

March 7, 201828, 2024

By:

/s/ James W. CornellA. Mish

James W. CornellA. Mish
Director

Date:

March 28, 2024

By:

/s/ Andrew Arno

Andrew Arno
Director

Date:

March 28, 2024

By:

/s/ Dr. Michael Koganov

Dr. Michael Koganov

Director

nthony

Date:

March 7, 201828, 2024

By:

/s/ Richard M. SandersAnthony Johnson

Richard M. Sanders
Director
Date:March 7, 2018By:/s/ Nora B. Sullivan

Nora B. Sullivan

Anthony Johnson

Director

59

Date:

March 28, 2024

By:

/s/ Lucille S. Salhany

Lucille S. Salhany

Director

58